Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 13 / Friday, January 18, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 3387 

3. SC 23.1199—Add the requirements 

of § 23.1199 while deleting the phrase, 

‘‘For commuter category airplanes.’’

23.1199, Extinguishing Agent 

Containers 

The following applies: 

(a) Each extinguishing agent container 

must have a pressure relief to prevent 

bursting of the container by excessive 

internal pressures. 

(b) The discharge end of each 

discharge line from a pressure relief 

connection must be located so that 

discharge of the fire-extinguishing agent 

would not damage the airplane. The line 

must also be located or protected to 

prevent clogging caused by ice or other 

foreign matter. 

(c) A means must be provided for 

each fire extinguishing agent container 

to indicate that the container has 

discharged or that the charging pressure 

is below the established minimum 

necessary for proper functioning. 

(d) The temperature of each container 

must be maintained, under intended 

operating conditions, to prevent the 

pressure in the container from—

(1) Falling below that necessary to 

provide an adequate rate of discharge; or 

(2) Rising high enough to cause 

premature discharge. 

(e) If a pyrotechnic capsule is used to 

discharge the fire extinguishing agent, 

each container must be installed so that 

temperature conditions will not cause 

hazardous deterioration of the 

pyrotechnic capsule. 

4. SC 23.1201—Add the requirements 

of § 23.1201 while deleting the phrase, 

‘‘For commuter category airplanes.’’

23.1201, Fire Extinguishing System 

Materials 

The following apply: 

(a) No material in any fire 

extinguishing system may react 

chemically with any extinguishing agent 

so as to create a hazard. 

(b) Each system component in an 

engine compartment must be fireproof. 

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on January 

7, 2008. 

John Colomy, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E8–849 Filed 1–17–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Food and Drug Administration 

21 CFR Part 1271 

Human Cells, Tissues, and Cellular and 

Tissue-Based Products 

CFR Correction 

In Title 21 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, Parts 800 to 1299, revised 

as of April 1, 2007, in part 1271, on page 

718, § 1271.22 is reinstated to read as 

follows: 

§ 1271.22 How and where do I register and 

submit an HCT/P list? 

(a) You must use Form FDA 3356 for: 

(1) Establishment registration, 

(2) HCT/P listings, and 

(3) Updates of registration and HCT/ 

P listing. 

(b) You may obtain Form FDA 3356: 

(1) By writing to the Center for 

Biologics Evaluation and Research 

(HFM–775), Food and Drug 

Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, 

Rockville, MD 20852–1448, Attention: 

Tissue Establishment Registration 

Coordinator; 

(2) By contacting any Food and Drug 

Administration district office; 

(3) By calling the CBER Voice 

Information System at 1–800–835–4709 

or 301–827–1800; or 

(4) By connecting to http:// 

www.fda.gov/opacom/morechoices/ 

fdaforms/cber.html on the Internet. 

(c)(1) You may submit Form FDA 

3356 to the Center for Biologics 

Evaluation and Research (HFM–775), 

Food and Drug Administration, 1401 

Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852–

1448, Attention: Tissue Establishment 

Registration Coordinator; or 

(2) You may submit Form FDA 3356 

electronically through a secure web 

server at http://www.fda.gov/cber/ 

tissue/tisreg.htm. 

[69 FR 68681, Nov. 24, 2004] 

[FR Doc. 08–55500 Filed 1–17–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1505–01–D 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION 

29 CFR Part 1601 

RIN 3046–AA83 

Procedural Regulations Under Title VII 

and ADA 

AGENCY: Equal Employment 

Opportunity Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Equal Employment 

Opportunity Commission is eliminating 

three bases for dismissal of charges in 

its procedural regulations because they 

are no longer needed to accomplish the 

Commission’s case management goals. 

DATES: Effective Date: February 19, 2008 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas J. Schlageter, Assistant Legal 

Counsel, or Mona Papillon, Senior 

General Attorney, at (202) 663–4640 

(voice) or (202) 663–7026 (TTY). Copies 

of this final rule are also available in the 

following alternate formats: Large print, 

braille, audiotape and electronic file on 

computer disk. Requests for this notice 

in an alternative format should be made 

to EEOC’s Publication Center at 1–800–

669–3362 (voice) or 1–800–800–3302 

(TTY). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Prior to 

1977, the Commission’s procedural 

regulations only authorized dismissal 

when the Commission issued a no cause 

determination, a charge was untimely, 

or a charge failed to state a claim. In 

1977, the Commission adopted three 

additional bases for dismissal in order 

to resolve charges that were timely and 

stated a claim, but where the 

Commission was unable to issue a 

determination on the merits for various 

reasons. These three bases are currently 

set out in § 1601.18(b) through (d). 

Paragraph (b) permits dismissal when 

the charging party fails to cooperate. 

Paragraph (c) permits dismissal when 

the charging party cannot be located. 

Paragraph (d) permits dismissal when 

the charging party refuses to accept an 

offer of full relief for the harm alleged 

in the charge. 

In 1995, the Commission adopted 

Priority Charge Handling Procedures 

(PCHP) to facilitate flexibility and 

permit more strategic use of resources. 

Among other things, PCHP authorized 

field offices to issue final 

determinations when further 

investigation was not likely to lead to 

evidence establishing a violation of the 

employment discrimination statutes. 

Thus, § 1601.18(b) through (d) are no 

longer needed to accomplish the 

Commission’s case management goals. 

Their elimination is also consistent with 

EEOC’s procedural regulations 

governing the Age Discrimination in 

Employment Act and the Equal Pay Act 

which do not contain the dismissal 

bases of failure to cooperate, to locate, 

and to accept full relief. 

In addition, the continued inclusion 

of these dismissal bases in the 

regulations is causing unnecessary 

confusion. There is a split in the courts 

regarding the proper interpretation of 

paragraphs (b) through (d). Compare 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with RULES