alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.0

SUBSIDIARIES



|                                                                            |  |                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|Incorporation/Organization                                                  |  | Jurisdiction of
|iGATE Mastech, Inc. (f/k/a Mastech Emplifi, Inc.)                           |  | Pennsylvania   
|itiliti, LLC (f/k/a Ex-tra-Net Applications, Inc.)                          |  | Pennsylvania   
|Global Financial Services of Nevada                                         |  | Nevada         
|iGATE Capital Management, Inc.                                              |  | Pennsylvania   
|RedBrigade Limited                                                          |  | United Kingdom 
|RPO Worldwide, Inc. (f/k/a RedBrigade, Inc.)                                |  | Pennsylvania   
|iGATE Holding Corporation                                                   |  | Delaware       
|iGATE Management, Inc.                                                      |  | Pennsylvania   
|Highgate Venture Partners I, L.P. (f/k/a iGATE Venture Partners I, L.P.)    |  | Delaware       
|Highgate Ventures I, L.P. (f/k/a iGATE Ventures I, L.P.)                    |  | Delaware       
|Pure Pay Partners, Inc. (f/k/a Mastech Application Services, Inc.)          |  | Pennsylvania   
|iGATE, Inc. (f/k/a Mastech Systems Corporation)                             |  | Pennsylvania   
|iGATE Global Solutions Ltd. (f/k/a Mascot Systems Limited)                  |  | India          
|Mastech Trademark Systems, Inc.                                             |  | Delaware       
|Synerge Holding, Inc.                                                       |  | Delaware       
|iGATE Clinical Research International Inc.                                  |  | Pennsylvania   
|iGATE Clinical Research International PVT Ltd (f/k/a Diagno Search Ltd.)    |  | India          
|iGATE Infrastructure Management Services Limited (f/k/a IT&T Services Ltd.) |  | India          
|Mascot Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.                                                   |  | Malaysia       
|Mascot Systems GmbH                                                         |  | Germany        
|Air2Web                                                                     |  | Georgia        
|LoanPro LLC                                                                 |  | Delaware       
|Emplifi Technologies (India) Private Limited                                |  | India
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Johnny Lee Childress, Jr. v . The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 6

- 00 4 1 6

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 5

- DCR

- 0 70013A

Trial court: 400 th District Court of Fort Bend County

On September 15, 2016, this Court ordered Michael C. Diaz, the court

- appointed counsel for appellant, Johnny Lee Childress, Jr., to file a motion to withdraw with an

amended Anders brief and a Kelly notice within 10 days of that order. See Anders v. Calif ornia , 386 U.S. 738, 7 44, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 1400 (1967); Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d

313

, 319

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). On September 22, 2016, this Court’s order granted the motion for access to the appellate record filed by the pro se appellant and grant ed him

a 45

- day extension of time to file any response to the Anders brief.

However, also on September 22, 2016, th e Clerk of thi s Court received a letter, submitted by the pro se a ppellant on September 20, 2016, giving notice that appellant wants to withdraw this appeal in response to the Anders brief, but it was not signed by

counsel. The Clerk of this Court is directed to file appellant’s letter as a pro se letter

motion to dismiss. Under Rule 42.2(a), any voluntary motion to dismiss in a criminal appeal must contain both the signature of appellant’s counsel and the appellant, and it must be filed in duplicate with the Clerk of this Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

Accordingly, t he Court DEN IES appellant’s pro se letter

- motion to dismiss this appeal without prejudice to refiling by appellant’s counsel because it was neither signed by counsel nor filed in duplicate. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). The Court w ithdraw s both the September 15 and 22 , 2016 Order s and will consider a motion to dismiss filed by appellant’s counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a)

.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Lau ra C. Higley

 Acting individually

Date: September 27, 2016
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 December 4, 2015 
 Dear Jeff,

 Outerwall is pleased to offer you the position of Interim Chief Accounting Officer with the company. Effective December 9, 2015 you will assume the
title, authority and responsibilities of Chief Accounting Officer reporting directly to the Chief Financial Officer. This is an interim assignment and will conclude upon appointment of the Chief Accounting Officer position. This letter will serve to
confirm our understanding of your acceptance of this position. 
 Salary 

Effective for the period of the interim assignment, your compensation will be based on an annualized salary of $185,500, less all required withholding for
taxes and social security. You will be paid bi-weekly (26 times per year). 
 Incentive Plans: 

You are eligible to continue to participate in Outerwall’s incentive plans. Your target bonus opportunity will continue at 20% of your base compensation
and eligible earnings during the interim assignment will apply in the calculation of your target bonus. You will continue to participate in the bonus plan for shared service employees and/or similar plan in 2016. 

As part of this interim assignment, your total 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) will be targeted at $60,000. The final amount of the award will be
determined in conjunction with our annual review process and may vary based on performance. This award is administered by the Outerwall Compensation Committee and will be subject to the terms of the Company’s 2011 Incentive Plan and the
respective grant and award agreements. This equity award will be processed with the annual equity grants of other employees in February, 2016. 

1800114th Avenue SE, Bellevue, WA 98004 
 P.O. Box
91258 Bellevue, WA 98009 
 outerwall.com 







 Filing Bonus 

Following the successful completion and timely filing of the 2015 10-K and other Q1 filings, you will be eligible for one-time bonus of $20,000. This bonus
will be paid as soon as administratively feasible following the filing in 2016. 
 Benefits 

You will continue to be eligible for your current Outerwall benefits. 

Jeff, if you agree with and accept the terms of this interim assignment, please sign and return one copy of this letter to me by December 7, 2015.
Congratulations, I look forward to working more closely together. 
  

									
	Sincerely,	 		  	Accepted by:	  		  	
					
	



	 		  	



	  	Date	  	12/3/15
	Galen C. Smith	 		  	Jeffrey W. Kist	  		  	
	Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

Board of Directors and Stockholders Heuristic Development Group, Inc. Manhattan
Beach, California

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Heuristic Development Group,
Inc. (a development stage company) as of December 31, 1998, and the related
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity (capital deficiency)
and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period then ended and for
the period from July 20, 1994 (inception) through December 31, 1998. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards required that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements enumerated above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Heuristic Development Group, Inc.
at December 31, 1998 and the results of its operations and cash flows for each
of the years in the two-year period then ended and for the period from July 20,
1994 (inception) through December 31, 1998 in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles.

As described in Note A the Company has decided to pursue a strategy of an
investment in, or acquisition of, an existing company. However, there can be no
assurances that an appropriate investment or acquisition will be identified.

Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York March 23 1999

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------

(C) Copyright 1995-1998 Cybernet Data Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7830

FRANK O'NEAL JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FLOYD R. FRAZIER, Major; JEFFREY W. FRAZIER,

Captain; RAYMOND ROSSENER, Lieutenant; CRIT

BARTLEY, Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-94-499-R)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank O'Neal Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. George Harrison Gilliam,

GILLIAM, SCOTT & KRONER, P.C., Charlottesville, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The magistrate judge conducted the proceedings pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988).

2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint.* We have reviewed

the record and the magistrate judge's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Johnson v. Frazier, No. CA-94-499-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 30,

1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 4:11-cv-00124-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 03/28/11 Page 1 of 9
Case 4:11-cv-00124-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 03/28/11 Page 2 of 9
Case 4:11-cv-00124-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 03/28/11 Page 3 of 9
Case 4:11-cv-00124-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 03/28/11 Page 4 of 9
Case 4:11-cv-00124-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 03/28/11 Page 5 of 9
Case 4:11-cv-00124-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 03/28/11 Page 6 of 9
Case 4:11-cv-00124-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 03/28/11 Page 7 of 9
Case 4:11-cv-00124-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 03/28/11 Page 8 of 9
Case 4:11-cv-00124-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 03/28/11 Page 9 of 9
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40064

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CESAR ESTUARDO HERNANDEZ-CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-72-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar Estuardo 

Hernandez-Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez-Cruz has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 16, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40064 Document: 00513639879 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
No. 16-40064

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40064 Document: 00513639879 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001029023
<NAME> SLH CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       33
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,529
<PP&E>                                           2,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,155
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,165
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0<F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,813<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,474
<SALES>                                         15,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,365
<CGS>                                           15,250
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,142)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        56
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,198)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,400)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,598)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.45)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>The historical financial information presented reflects periods during
which SLH Corporation did not exist but rather reflects the financial
information of the Transfer Assets and Transfer Liabilities which relate
directly to the businesses transferred to SLH Corporation from Seafield
Capital Corporation.
<F2>Computation not applicable
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of iGATE Corporation:



| | 1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-20033) pertaining to the Mastech Corporation 1996 Stock Incentive Plan of iGATE Corporation,
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-71057) pertaining to the Mastech Corporation Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan of iGATE Corporation,
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-134689) pertaining to the iGATE Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of iGATE Corporation, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-162606) of iGATE Corporation;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated February 25, 2010, with respect to the 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements of iGATE Corporation and the 2009 effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of iGATE Corporation, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.



/s/ Ernst & Young


New Delhi, India

February 25, 2010
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of AGY Holding Corp. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Douglas J. Mattscheck            
|Douglas J. Mattscheck                
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|(Principal Executive Officer)        

Dated: August 19, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AGY Holding Corp. and will be retained by AGY Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10040

IN THE MATTER OF: 

ROBERT DOUGLAS MCCAFFITY,

Debtor,

ROBERT DOUGLAS MCCAFFITY,

Appellant,

versus

JENNIFER D. HERRIN,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:96-CV-673-A)

January 8, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, HIGGINBOTHAM and DEMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This matter is before the court on appeal of the district court’s affirmance of

the orders of the bankruptcy court dismissing the bankruptcy petition of Robert

Douglas McCaffity and imposing sanctions. Having considered the record and

briefs, and finding no reversible error, the judgment appealed is AFFIRMED.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Xin Qiu, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Heli Electronics
      Corp. for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Heli Electronics Corp.                                                                     

Dated: November ____, 2010

| | /s/
      Xin Qiu                                      
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | Xin Qiu                                                
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director        
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)              
| | Heli Electronics Corp.                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Heli Electronics
Corp. and will be retained by Heli Electronics Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
DOSE RECONSTRUCTION 

REVIEW METHODS

UPDATE 

NOVEMBER 18, 2015
CONTINUE CURRENT REVIEWS

MODIFY % REVIEWED?

MODIFY CASE SELECTION?

MODIFY RESOLUTION PROCESS?

COLLECT MORE DATA ON CASE 

REVIEWS?
CONTINUE BLIND REVIEWS

BOARD PRESENTATION ON RESULTS

MODIFY NUMBER OF REVIEWS?

MODIFY CASE SELECTION?

MODIFY METHODS?
ADD TARGETED REVIEWS

CURRENTLY DON’T EVALUATE 

CONSISTENCY OF DR PROCESS

MORE IMPORTANT FOR DR METHODS 

THAT ARE NOT DOCUMENTED/REVIEWED 

AND REQUIRE MORE INDIVIDUAL 

JUDGMENT 

DEVELOP METHOD TO SELECT CASES 

AND EVALUATE CONSISTENCY
DOCUMENTATION

RECENT DR REVIEW RESULTS REPORTS

SC&A REPORT ON SEC AND SITE PROFILE 

CHANGES FOR RECENT REVIEWS

MAPPING OF DR PROCESS FOR A SITE