Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search
		×
			NIOSH
			NIOSH
				All CDC
				Submit
			For a full list of topics:A-Z Index
			Advanced Search
		Advanced Search


The National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL)








Respirator Evaluation in Acute Care Hospitals Study (REACH)										Related Pages
										REACH I (2009 – 2010)
This project assessed the usage of respiratory protection for influenza exposure among healthcare workers (HCWs) in 16 California hospitals during the H1N1 influenza. 204 HCWs participated in this study representing a variety of clinical specialties (i.e., ER, ICU, Peds) and roles including unit managers, respiratory protection administrators, and direct care providers. Observational methods were also employed to better understand donning and doffing practices.
***Relevance to worker safety and health*** – Findings from REACH I serve as a ‘snap shot’ of: 1) the extent to which hospitals in California have implemented required elements of a respiratory protection program for influenza; and 2) the usage of personal respiratory protection for influenza exposure among California healthcare workers.
***Key Findings***
50% of the hospital managers reported that their facility had experienced a shortage of respirators between April 2009 and the survey period (January 20 – February 23, 2010).
The observational data indicates improper use of respiratory protective equipment as evidenced by donning and doffing practices.
Not performing a seal check
Improper strap placementTouching the face piece upon doffing
In response to the question what healthcare workers believe, 65% felt that they were at a high risk of becoming ill with influenza due to their work, 96% felt that wearing an N95 or better respirator could help protect them from on-the-job exposures to influenza and 94% indicated that N95 respirators are more effective at protecting them from influenza than surgical masks.
Inresponse to a question related to how respondents knew that they needed to wear a respirator, the top two responses indicated that they waited to be “cued” by signage on the door or to be told during shift report.***Reference*** -A paper summarizing this work has been published in the *American Journal of Infection Control*:
Beckman S, Materna B, Goldmacher S, Zipprich J, D’Alessandro M, Novak D, Harrison R [2013]. Evaluation of respiratory protection programs and practices in California hospitals during the 2009-2010 H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Infect Control *41*(11):1024-1031.
***Status*** – Completed.
**REACH Intervention and Evaluation**
The objective of this project is to extend and build upon the work previously completed under REACH I by examining the effectiveness of various interventions for improving respiratory protection programs in California acute care facilities.***Relevance to worker safety and health***– Findings from REACH I suggest that N95 respirators are being widely used, although gaps in training, appropriate donning and evaluation have been identified. This project identified and evaluated effective interventions and best practices to strengthen California hospitals’ respiratory protection programs and reinforce healthcare workers’ proper use of respiratory protection.***Key Findings***– A toolkit of effective strategies was developed and tested in 14 California hospitals. The California Respirator Program Administrators toolkit can be accessed at: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DEODC/OHB/Pages/RespToolkit.aspx
***Status***– Completed
REACH II (2011 – 2012)
Expanded upon REACH I to evaluate hospitals’ written respiratory protection programs and assess healthcare workers’ usage of respiratory protection for influenza (droplet) and aerosol-transmissible exposures in five regions of the United States (Northeast, Southeast, Midwest, Southwest, and West).
***Relevance to worker safety and health***– Findings from REACH II serve as a ‘snap shot’ of: 1) the extent to which hospitals across the United States have implemented required elements of a respiratory protection program for influenza and 2) the usage of personal respiratory protection for seasonal influenza exposure among healthcare workers.
View the Required Labeling of NIOSH-Approved N95 Filter Facepiece Respirator.
***Key Findings***
Data collection completed in five regions and six sates of the U.S. The final data set included 98 hospitals, over 1500 participants (i.e., HCWs, Hospital and Unit Managers) as well as over 300 demonstrations of respirator donning and doffing.
Over 80% of participating hospitals reported adherence to many of the OSHA required respiratory protection program elements, such as:
Medical evaluations and fit testing prior to initial respirator use
Employee training on how and when to use respiratory protection
Respiratory protection guidelines regarding close contact with a patient with suspected or confirmed infectious disease or seasonal influenza
The lowest levels of adherence concerned factors, such as:
Frequency of medical evaluations
Informing staff about the model and size of respirator they have been fit tested for
Formal evaluations of respiratory protection programs
Similarly to REACH I findings, HCWs demonstrated improper donning and doffing procedures:
46% used incorrect strap placement
85% did not perform a seal check
57% did not use straps during doffing
45% used improper respirator disposal methods
Hospital and Unit Managers reported overall higher adherence rates to respiratory protection guidelines than HCWs. In other words, those closest to the “bedside” (i.e., more contact with patients) were less likely to provide correct survey responses with regards to respiratory protection recommendations or requirements for selected diseases.***Reference*** – A paper summarizing findings from New York State has been published in the *American Journal of Infection Control*
REACH II Published Manuscripts
Peterson K, Roger B, Brosseau L ,Payne J, Cooney J, Joe L, & Novak D. (2016). Differences in Hospital Managers’, Unit Managers’, and Health Care Workers’ Perceptions of the Safety Climate for Respiratory Protection. Workplace Health and Safety 64 (7), 326-336.
Peterson K, Novak D, Stradtman L, Wilson D, & Couzens L (2015). Hospital respiratory protection practices in 6 U.S. states: A public health evaluation study. AJIC 43(1),63-71.
Brosseau LM, Conroy LM, Sietsema M, Cline K, & Durski K. (2015). Evaluation of Minnesota and Illinois hospital respiratory protection programs and health care worker respirator use. JOEH 12(1), 1-15.
Sietsema M, Conroy LM, & Brosseau LM. (2015). Comparing Written Programs and Self-Reported Respiratory Protection Practices in Acute Care Hospitals. JOEH 12(3),189-198.
Hines L, Rees E, & Pavlechak N (2014). Respiratory protection policies and practices among the health care workforce exposed to influenza in New York State: Evaluating emergency preparedness for the next pandemic. AJIC 42(3), 240-45.
The Joint Commission. Implementing Hospital Respiratory Protection Programs: Strategies from the Field. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission, Dec 2014.
OSHA, NIOSH. Hospital Respiratory Protection Toolkit: Resources for Respiratory Protection Administrators, May 2015.***Status***– Completed
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  January 12, 2018						Source: 	National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeNPPTL
What’s New on the NPPTL Websiteplus icon
NPPTL What’s New Archives
A to Z Index
Respiratory Protection Videos
Resources for Mine Workers
Resources for Emergency Responders
Respirator Approval Programplus icon
Respirator Approval Information
Respirator Standards
Respirator User Notices
Resources and Technical Support
Post-market Evaluationsplus icon
PPE CASE Reports
PPE CASE Notes
Respirator Assessments to Support COVID-19 Responseplus icon
Beyond Shelf Life/Stockpiled Assessment Results
International Assessment Results
Decontaminated Assessment Results
Non-NIOSH Approved Innovative Filtering Facepiece Respirator Assessment Results
Protective Clothing and Ensembles
Personal Protective Technology Program
NIOSH Respiratory Protection Week 2023
NPPTL Infographics
NPPTL Fact Sheets
Healthcare Respiratory Protection Resourceplus icon
Policies and Procedures
Program Administrator
Evaluation and Selection
Medical Evaluation
Fit Testing
Proper Use and Storage
Training
Program Evaluation
Recordkeeping
Support for Firefighter Personal Protective Equipmentplus icon
Self-Contained Breathing Apparatusplus icon
Program Overview
Evaluation Process
Completed Reports
Resources
Firefighter Turnout Gearplus icon
Current Projects
Completed Projects
Participation on Standards Setting Organizations
Resources
Considerations for Selecting Protective Clothing
NPPTL Participation in Standard Development Committees
Respiratory Protection Information Trusted Sourceplus icon
Types of Respiratory Protection
Use of NIOSH-approved Respirators
Frequently Asked Questionsplus icon
Respirator FAQs
Fit Test FAQs
NIOSH Approval FAQs
Healthcare Setting Specific FAQs
Approved Particulate Filtering Facepiece Respirators
Certified Equipment List (CEL)
PPE CASE Reports
Respirator User Notices
Meetings, Webinars, & Conferencesplus icon
Archived Meetings and Conferences
Conformity Assessment Notices and Letters to Respirator Manufacturers and Interested Parties
About NPPTL
Contact NPPTL Connect with NPPTL Subscribe to Listserv
PPE concerns? Contact Us
 Follow NIOSH Facebook
Pinterest
Twitter
YouTube
 NIOSH Homepage NIOSH A-Z
Workplace Safety & Health Topics
Publications and Products
Programs
Contact NIOSH


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue