alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5740 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5740

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to permit the State agency 
to disclose personal identifying information of a household member to a 
law enforcement officer who provides such member's household electronic 
   benefit transfer card number for the purpose of apprehending such 
 member who is fleeing to avoid prosecution, or custody or confinement 
                     after conviction, for a crime.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2018

Mr. Joyce of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                      the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to permit the State agency 
to disclose personal identifying information of a household member to a 
law enforcement officer who provides such member's household electronic 
   benefit transfer card number for the purpose of apprehending such 
 member who is fleeing to avoid prosecution, or custody or confinement 
                     after conviction, for a crime.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enhancing Law Enforcement Resources 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 11(e)(8)(E) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 
2020(e)(8)(E)) is amended by inserting ``(or the number of the member's 
household electronic benefit transfer card)'' after ``the member'' the 
first place it appears.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 10.11**

**SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

**THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**(the “Amendment”) is entered into as of the 24th day of February 2009 (the “Effective Date”), by and betweenSpectrum Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) and John A. Heil (the “Executive”). 

**WHEREAS**, the Company andthe Executive previously entered into that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated January 16, 2007 (the “Agreement”); and 

**WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive wish to amend certain provisions of the Agreement in recognition of the Executive’s past services to the Company and the importance to the future successof the Company of the Executive’s continued services; and 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, in consideration of the premises andmutual agreements contained herein (promises that include benefits to which the Executive would not otherwise be entitled), and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and theExecutive hereby agree as follows: 

1. Capitalized Terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given those terms in the Agreement.

2. As of the Effective Date, Executive’s Base Salary was Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) per annum (the “Existing BaseSalary Amount”). For the period from March 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 (the “Temporary Reduction Period”), Executive’s Base Salary shall be Four Hundred and Seventy-Five Thousand, Fifty Dollars ($475,000) perannum. As of January 1, 2010, Executive’s Base Salary shall return to the Existing Base Salary Amount. Notwithstanding this temporary reduction in Base Salary, for purposes of calculating any Bonus or other incentive plan amounts or anyother benefit specified in the Employment Agreement or any other agreement between the Company and the Executive, including, without limitation, any severance benefits included therein, earned during the Temporary Reduction Period the Existing BaseSalary Amount shall be used as the Base Salary. 

3. Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect, andthe execution of this Amendment shall not affect the rights of the Company or the Executive under the terms of the Agreement as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Date with respect to events occurring before the Effective Date. 

**[Signature Page Follows]**

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date firstabove written. 

 
SPECTRUM BRANDS, INC
/s/ Kent J. Hussey

By:
 Kent J. Hussey, Chief Executive Officer
 
EXECUTIVE:
/s/ John A. Heil

Name:
 John A. Heil
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2016 

# Order

January 22 , 2016

1529 76 ( 67 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

CHRISTOPHER ALLEN PERRIEN

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 1529 76

COA: 3 17405

Eaton CC: 201 2

- 020053

- FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant to file an

application for leave to appeal in excess of the page limit restriction is GRANTED. The

60

- page application submitted on January 11 , 2016, is accepted for filing.
Exhibit
      32.2







CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond
      F. Kunzmann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


(1)
                The
                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                    or 15(d) of
                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                    and





(2)
                The
                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                    the
                    Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







/s/
      Raymond F.
      Kunzmann


Raymond
      F. Kunzmann


Chief
      Financial Officer


September
      11, 2006
ABRWH

Work Group on TBD-6000 

November 2, 2011 

9:00 a.m. EDT 

Cincinnati Airport Marriott Hotel

 Conference Phone: 866-659-0537 

Participant Code: 9933701 

AGENDA

Note: Lunch break at 12:00 noon. Adjournment no later than 3:00 pm. 

1. Roll Call and Call to Order (Ted Katz and Paul Ziemer)

2. Introductory remarks and review of Agenda (Paul Ziemer)

3. Consideration of questions regarding what sources were in use and what radiation safety 

practices were used in the early years

a. Summary of recent SC&A interviews with former workers concerning 

radiography sources and practices

b. Summary of information obtained regarding early radiography sources and 

cameras

4. Consideration of questions regarding the reliability of film badge data

a. NIOSH White Paper on film badge response 

b. SC&A review of NIOSH White Paper on film badge response 

c. Petitioner’s concerns regarding film badge response 

5. Consideration of question of whether or not the NIOSH model will bound dose with 

sufficient accuracy for the early years (1953-63) 

a. NIOSH position and comments

b. SC&A position and comments on NIOSH model 

c. Work Group position on bounding doses for the early years 

6. Next steps and plans for upcoming Work Group activities 

7. Adjourn
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 15, 2017

p1212

Order 

Clerk

December 15, 2017

154489 & (86)

TERI WALTERS and KIM WALTERS,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 154489

COA: 319016

Eaton CC: 12-000658-NH

DONALD S. FALIK, D.D.S., d/b/a FALIK

FAMILY DENTISTRY, ROBERT C.

FALIK, D.D.S., and JANE DOE,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/

On December 6, 2017, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave 

to appeal the August 16, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, 

the application is again considered. MCR 7.305(H)(1). In lieu of granting leave to 

appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and REINSTATE the order 

of the Eaton Circuit Court granting the defendants’ motion in limine to exclude the 

plaintiffs’ expert’s testimony on causation. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in 

finding that the plaintiffs’ proposed expert witness’s opinion was unreliable, especially 

since the scientific articles presented by the plaintiffs indicated that the etiology of 

Wegener’s granulomatosis (“Wegener’s”) is unknown and that no study has referred to 

an association between phosphoric acid and Wegener’s. Further, the plaintiff’s proposed 

expert failed to explain why phosphoric acid was analogous to other environmental 

factors potentially associated with Wegener’s. The trial court thus did not abuse its 

discretion when it held that his testimony was not sufficiently reliable to proceed to the 

jury because it amounted to speculation. See Elher v Misra, 499 Mich 11 (2016); Edry v 

Adelman, 486 Mich 634, 639 (2010). Defendants’ motion for leave to file a response to 

amicus curiae brief of the Michigan Association for Justice is GRANTED. 

BERNSTEIN, J. (dissenting). 

I would affirm for the reasons stated in the Court of Appeals majority opinion. I 

believe the Court of Appeals majority reached the right result for the right reasons.
##### 



Exhibit 11
  AMSCAN
    HOLDINGS, INC.
  RATIO OF
    EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
  Four


EightMonths


MonthsEnded


EndedApril 30,


December 31,


Years Ended December 31,2004


2004


2005


2006


2007Earnings:Income (loss) before taxes and minority interests

$
(1,395
)

$
14,380


$
17,221


$
10,818


$
32,953Add: fixed charges


9,800



21,674



36,230



82,362



91,462Deduct: interest capitalizedEarnings as adjusted:

$
8,405


$
36,054


$
53,451


$
93,180


$
124,415Computation of Fixed Charges:Interest, expensed and capitalized

$
8,494


$
19,137


$
31,989


$
55,007


$
54,900Interest portion of rent expense


1,306


$
2,537



4,241



27,355



36,562Total Fixed Charges

$
9,800


$
21,674


$
36,230


$
82,362


$
91,462Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


0.9
x


1.7
x


1.5
x


1.1
x


1.4x  F-51
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5653 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5653

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that any alien 
who has been convicted of a felony or two misdemeanors, is deportable, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2018

Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mr. Abraham, Mr. Babin, Mr. Blum, Mr. Budd, Mr. 
Cramer, Mr. Crawford, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mr. 
 Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. Garrett, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Gohmert, Mr. Harris, 
 Mr. Jody B. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Jones, Mr. King 
 of Iowa, Mr. Marino, Mr. Norman, Mr. Perry, Mr. Posey, Mr. Yoho, Mr. 
 Buck, Mr. Arrington, Mr. Biggs, Mr. McClintock, Mr. Barletta, and Mr. 
    Brat) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that any alien 
who has been convicted of a felony or two misdemeanors, is deportable, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Criminal Alien Removal Clarification 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL GROUNDS FOR DEPORTABILITY.

    Section 237(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1227(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Criminal grounds.--Any alien who, at any time after 
        admission, has been convicted of a felony or two misdemeanors, 
        whether under State or Federal law, is deportable.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.02

                  DeGolyer and MacNaughton
                      One Energy Square
                    Dallas, Texas  75206

                       March 25, 1998



Enron Corp.
1400 Smith Street
Houston, Texas 77002

Gentlemen:

     We hereby consent to the references to our firm and to
our opinions delivered to Enron Oil & Gas Company (the
Company) regarding our comparison of estimates prepared by
us with those furnished to us by the Company of the proved
oil, condensate, natural gas liquids, and natural gas
reserves of certain selected properties owned by the
Company. The opinions are contained in our letter reports
dated January 22, 1996, January 17, 1997, and January 13,
1998, for estimates as of December 31, 1995, December 31,
1996, and December 31, 1997, respectively. The opinions are
referred to in the section "Oil and Gas Exploration and
Production Properties and Reserves-Reserve Information" and
Note 18 to Enron Corp.'s Consolidated Financial Statements
entitled "Oil and Gas Producing Activities-Oil and Gas
Reserves Information" in Enron Corp.'s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 27,
1998. DeGolyer and MacNaughton also consents to the
inclusion of our letter report, dated January 13, 1998,
addressed to the Company as an Exhibit (23.03) to Enron
Corp.'s Form 10-K. Additionally, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of such references to our firm
and to our opinions included in Enron Corp.'s Form 10-K in
Enron Corp.'s previously filed Registration Statement Nos.
33-13397, 33-13498, 33-27893, 33-34796, 33-52768, 33-52261,
33-52143, 33-60821, 333-22739, 333-19253, 333-42645,
333-44133, and 333-38253.

                              Very truly yours,


                              /s/ DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
                              DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Work Group on Mound

Cincinnati Airport Marriott 

2395 Progress Dr. 

Hebron, KY 41048 

859-586-0166 

Conference Call Number: 

Participant Pass Code: 

5/27/09 (page 1 of 2) 

9:30 Welcome 

 SC&A - Adequacy of internal dose records issue 11 

11:00 Break 

SC&A - Integrity/Completeness of internal dose 

records issue 12 & 13 

12:30 Lunch 

SC&A - Adequacy and completeness of external dose 

records issue 18 & 19 

SC&A - Stable tritium compounds issue 6 

2:30 Break 

SC&A - Price-Anderson related bioassay issues # 21 
 AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Work Group on Mound

Cincinnati Airport Marriott 

2395 Progress Dr. 

Hebron, KY 41048 

859-586-0166 

Conference Call Number: 

Participant Pass Code: 

5/28/09 (page 2 of 2) 

9:30 Welcome 

 NIOSH - Neutron doses reconstruction issue 14&15 

11:00 Break 

 NIOSH - High-Fired PU-238 issue 9 

12:30 Lunch 

 SC&A - Radon issue 2 

 NIOSH - Exposure in non rad buildings issue 17 

2:30 Break 

 NIOSH - “Road Map” Integrated issues 1,3,4,7 & 8 

NIOSH - D&D years 

 WG - Assigned Action Items, future meeting plans
No. 04-15-00480-CV

__________________________________________ 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS

FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

__________________________________________ 

LIBERTY SPORT AVIATION, L.P., 

Appellant, 

vs.

TEXAS HILL COUNTRY BANK, 

Appellee.

__________________________________________ 

FROM THE 216TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, KENDALL COUNTY, 

CAUSE NO. 14-314/14-314A, HON. KEITH WILLIAMS, PRESIDING

__________________________________________ 

APPELLANTS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE 

APPEALS

To the Honorable Court: 

This appeal arises from the entry of a summary judgment 

motion that was then severed into a separate cause of action. The 

original cause of action was numbered 14-314. After the severance 

order was entered and motion for new trial was filed, the trial court 

assigned a new cause number to the severed cause of action (14-

314A). In an abundance of caution, Appellant Liberty Sport Aviation 

L.P. filed a notice of appeal in both causes and, as a result, this 

ACCEPTED

04-15-00480-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

8/7/2015 7:32:00 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 08/07/15 7:32:00 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
2

Court docketed two appeals, not one (04-15-00479-CV and 04-15-

480-CV). Although two appellate numbers were docketed, there will 

be only one appeal: a challenge to the trial court’s summary 

judgment order that was later severed into a separate cause. Thus, 

for purposes of judicial efficiency and to remedy the error, Appellant 

requests this Court consolidate the appeals. Appellee is unopposed 

to this Motion.

Respectfully submitted,

KELLER STOLARCZYK, PLLC

234 West Bandera Road #120

Boerne, Texas 78006

Tele: 830.981.5000

Facs: 888.293.8580

/s/Kimberly S. Keller

Kimberly S. Keller

SBN: 24014182

kim@kellsto.com

COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT
3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE & SERVICE

 I certify that on August 6, 2015, co-counsel Jonathan Cluck 

conferred with counsel for Appellee (Mr. Maguire) and was informed 

Appellee is unopposed to this Motion. On August 7, 2015, this 

Motion to Consolidate was served on those individuals listed below 

via this Court’s e-filing system, facsimile, and/or email:

M. Patrick Maguire

945 Barnett Street

Kerrville, Texas 78028

William Michael Childers

222 Sidney Baker South, Suite 630

Kerrville, Texas 78028

/s/Kimberly S. Keller

Kimberly S. Keller
Exhibit 32.1 and 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the quarterly report of Millstream Ventures, Inc. (Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (Report), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  February 8, 2010   /s/ Steven L. White Steven L. White, President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIt 23.1











            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Streicher Mobile Fueling, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-84275, 333-79801, 333-61764, and 333-113622) and
Forms S-3 (File Nos. 333-30950, 333-30952, 333-84273, 333-61762, and 333-113682)
of Streicher Mobile Fueling, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our report dated
September 13, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets as of
June 30, 2004 and 2003, the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended June 30, 2004, which report appears in the June 30, 2004 annual
report on Form 10K of Streicher Mobile Fueling, Inc.

KPMG LLP

Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
September 28, 2004
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1968

EDDIE L. ALLEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusKENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-98-1015-3-22BC) Submitted: January 25, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. W. Daniel Mayes, Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellant. Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, John Berkley Grimball, Assistant United States Attorney, Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Chief Counsel, Region VIII, Yvette G. Keesee, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Eddie Allen appeals the district court’s order upholding the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denyingAllen’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record, the briefs, and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Apfel , No. CA-98-1015-3-22BC (D.S.C. May 11, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 23.1



To the Board of Directors
ELTEK LTD.


As independent auditors we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference, in
the Registration Statement on Form S-8, (Registration No. 333-12012) of Eltek
Ltd. (the "Company"), of our report dated July 10, 2003, relating to the balance
sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related
statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, for the nine month period ended December
31, 2000 and the year ended March 31, 2000 which report appears in the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/ Somekh Chaikin
Somekh Chaikin

Tel Aviv, Israel
July 10, 2003


<PAGE>