alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

          BEFORE THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                        WASHINGTON, D.C.


-----------------------------------------
                                        :
          In the Matter of              :     CERTIFICATE PURSUANT
                                        :              TO
     SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.      :            RULE 24
                                        :
          File No. 70-8511              :
                                        :
 (Public Utility Holding Company        :
            Act of 1935)                :
-----------------------------------------


      This  is  to certify, pursuant to Rule 24 under the  Public
Utility  Holding  Company  Act of  1935,  as  amended,  that  the
transactions  described  below, which  were  proposed  by  System
Energy   Resources,   Inc.  ("Company")   in   its   Application-
Declaration, as amended, in the above file, have been carried out
in  accordance  with  the terms and conditions  of  and  for  the
purposes represented by said Application-Declaration, as amended,
and  pursuant  to  the  orders  of the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission with respect thereto dated May 9, 1995 (Release No. 35-
26287),  August 18, 1995 (Release No. 35-26358), August 27,  1996
(Release No. 35-26561) and April 9, 1999 (Release No. 35-27003).

      On May 28, 1999, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement,
dated  as  of  May  15, 1999, with Mississippi  Business  Finance
Corporation ("MBFC"), pursuant to which MBFC issued and sold,  by
negotiated    public    offering,   to   Prudential    Securities
Incorporated,  Lehman  Brothers Inc. and J.P.  Morgan  Securities
Inc.  as underwriters, $102,975,000 in aggregate principal amount
of  its  5.90% Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds  (System
Energy Resources, Inc. Project) Series 1999.

     Attached hereto and incorporated by reference are:

          Exhibit B-4(c)    -     Conformed  copy  of  the  Trust
                         Indenture between MBFC and the Trustee.

          Exhibit B-6(c)    -     Conformed  Copy  of  the   Loan
                         Agreement between the Company and MBFC.

          Exhibit F-1(g)   -    Post-effective opinion of Ann  G.
                         Roy,  Senior  Counsel  -  Corporate  and
                         Securities  of  Entergy Services,  Inc.,
                         counsel for the Company.

          Exhibit F-2(g)   -    Post-effective opinion of  Thelen
                         Reid  &  Priest  LLP,  counsel  for  the
                         Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, System Energy Resources, Inc. has caused
this certificate to be executed this 8th day of June 1999.


                                 SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC.



                                 By:  /s/ Steven C. McNeal
                                         Steven C. McNeal
                                   Vice President and Treasurer
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement



 Exhibit 10.13 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED SERVICING AGREEMENT 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SERVICING AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made effective as of
March 1, 2015 by and between Hennessy Funds Trust, a Delaware statutory trust (the “Trust”), on behalf of each of its investment series set forth on Schedule A hereto as it may be amended from time to time (hereinafter
referred to each as a “Fund” and together as the “Funds”), and Hennessy Advisors, Inc., a California corporation (“HNNA”). 

RECITALS 
 WHEREAS,
the Trust is engaged in business as a diversified open-end management investment company and HNNA serves as investment adviser to the Funds pursuant to one or more investment advisory agreements with the Trust (the “Advisory
Agreements”); 
 WHEREAS, the Trust and HNNA previously entered into an Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated as
of February 28, 2014, pursuant to which the Trust retained HNNA to perform services to certain of the Funds that are in addition to the services that HNNA performs for such Funds pursuant to the Advisory Agreements (the “A&R
Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the A&R Agreement to replace Schedule A with an
updated schedule. 
 AGREEMENT 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and covenants hereinafter contained, the Trust on behalf of the Funds and HNNA do
mutually promise and agree as follows: 
 1. Schedule A to the A&R Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with Schedule A to
this Amendment. 
 2. Except as herein modified or amended, the terms and conditions of the A&R Agreement shall remain unchanged and in
full force and effect. 
 (Signature page follows.) 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed on the
day first above written. 
  

			
	HENNESSY ADVISORS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Neil J. Hennessy
		 	Neil J. Hennessy
		 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	
	HENNESSY FUNDS TRUST
		
	By:	 	/s/ Neil J. Hennessy
		 	Neil J. Hennessy
		 	President



  
 Signature Page to
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement 








 SCHEDULE A 

(as of March 1, 2015) 
  

			
	 Name of Fund – Investor Class Shares Only
	 	 Servicing Fee per Annum

(as a % of average daily net assets)

		
	 Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Focus Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Cornerstone Large Growth Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Large Value Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Total Return Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Equity and Income Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Balanced Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Core Bond Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Gas Utility Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Small Cap Financial Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Large Cap Financial Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Technology Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Japan Fund
	 	0.10%
		
	 Hennessy Japan Small Cap Fund
	 	0.10%


  
 Schedule A
Exhibit 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of H & H Imports, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Francis A. Rebello, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: January 8, 2010                   By: /s/ Francis A. Rebello
                                            ----------------------
                                            Francis A. Rebello, President
                                            (Principal Executive and Financial
                                            and Accounting Officer)
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 01-2443

JOHN GARRETT,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

TANDY CORPORATION D/B/A RADIO SHACK,

Defendant, Appellee.

_____________________

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on July 9, 2002, should be

amended as follows:

On page 28, line 3 of 2nd paragraph, replace "then" with

"than".
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5695 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5695

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to annually notify 
  health care providers regarding permitted disclosures under Federal 
  health care privacy law during emergencies, including overdoses, of 
  certain health information to families, caregivers, and health care 
                               providers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2018

 Mr. McKinley (for himself, Mr. Walberg, and Mrs. Dingell) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                                Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to annually notify 
  health care providers regarding permitted disclosures under Federal 
  health care privacy law during emergencies, including overdoses, of 
  certain health information to families, caregivers, and health care 
                               providers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emmett's Law''.

SEC. 2. COMMUNICATION WITH FAMILIES DURING EMERGENCIES.

    (a)  Promoting Awareness of Authorized Disclosures During 
Emergencies.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting 
through the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 
Services and the Administration of the Health Resources and Services 
Administration, shall annually develop and disseminate written 
materials (electronically or by other means) to health care providers 
regarding permitted disclosures under Federal health care privacy law 
during emergencies, including overdoses, of certain health information 
to families, caregivers, and health care providers.
    (b) Use of Material.--For the purposes of carrying out subsection 
(a), the Secretary of Health and Human Services may use material 
produced under section 11004 of the 21st Century Cures Act (42 U.S.C. 
1320d-2 note).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Risk Management & Investigative Solutions (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kyle Edwards, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Kyle Edwards


Kyle Edwards


Principal Executive Officer




November 24, 2010
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Kristen Paul, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wolfe Creek Mining,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
23rd day of April, 2008.


/s/ Kristen Paul
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1
 
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 16, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident and Principal Executive Officer E-2
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Eran Gronich, Secretary and Director (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) of The Mobile Star Corp.  (the “Company”),
certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
for the quarter ended June 30 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      July 29, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Eran
  GronichName: Eran
      GronichTitle: Secretary
      and Director(Principal
      Internal  Accounting
Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

Miller, Diane M.

From:

Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 6:30 PM
To: niocindocket@cdc.gov

Subject: special cohort
The following are my comments:

Iam the wife of a sick worker from Y-12 Plant in Oak Ridge, TN. I worked for the
Federal Government for 25 years and I know B.S. when I see it.

First, dose reconstruction is just a way to deny claims. DOE has admitted to making
the workers sick at their facilities, and it has also come to light that records were kept
in a fraudulent manner and, in some cases, missing. Certain plants (gaseous diffusion
plants) are put in a special cohort, and if the sick workers qualify, their payment is
automatic. Not so at other facilities. Do you think these other facilities kept accurate
records? I say NO. All the facilities were subject to DOE regulations and
recordkeeping. Therefore, dose reconstruction is a joke.

Second, the title to this program should be changed to "Energy Employees Death
Benefit" because most of the payments of $150,000 have gone to dead employees'
spouses and families. The very few SICK WORKERS paid have been in the "special
cohort" status where they automatically qualify.

Third, in the bill that Congress passed, it was stated "that if the workers had known
what they were working in, they would have demanded hazardous duty pay." These
workers have sacrificed their lives for this country during the “Cold War" and many are
sick and dying everyday. They are not asking for hazardous duty pay--only what
Congress has said they deserve. Also, I feel compelled to say that in Oak Ridge, TN,
our Congressman has not helped us at all and does not seem concerned enough even
to sign on to a letter to Spencer Abraham from other Congressmen to give us support.
Also the news media in Oak Ridge and Knoxville have also been "gagged" I suppose
because of the November election.

Fourth, as the wife of a sick worker who has been sick since 1994 with a numerous
amount of problems, such as Major Depression, sleep apnea, Ministroke, three heart
attacks, 7 heart bypasses, and now 4th stage prostate cancer which has spread to his
bones and lymph nodes, I have had to stand by and watch this patriotic man's health
deteriorate. This is a travesty of justice of the worst kind. And do not think that DOE
and the Government did not know that what they were working in could cause all this.
Otherwise, why did DOE keep mortality tables of workers and what they died from. I
believe these people were used as guinea pigs. You can pull up the MSDS on the
chemicals at these facilities and you will see what they cause--nevermind what
exposure to radiation causes.

Fifth, if you are going to use "Scientific Assumptions" to do dose reconstruction where
no records exist, then this is a contradiction in terms. I do not believe science is based
on "assumptions."

In summary, I am begging you to do as Congress asked--to pay the sick and dying
workers now--not next year and not ten years down the road. I would at least like my
husband to know that he has been paid what he deserved for his sacrifices before he

8/22/2002


Page 2 of 2

dies.

P.S. If I sound angry, I AM.

http://communities.msn.com/sickworkers

8/22/2002
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5827 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5827

 To extend the authorization for the National Dam Safety Program, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2018

  Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the authorization for the National Dam Safety Program, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dam Safety Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF DAM SAFETY PROGRAMS.

    Section 14 of the National Dam Safety Program Act (33 U.S.C. 467j) 
is amended by striking ``2015 through 2019'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``2015 through 2024''.
                                 <all>
```
Opinion issued August 18, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00537-CR

———————————

IN RE LAWRENCE FLOYD MILLER III, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Lawrence Floyd Miller III, has filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus, seeking to have the trial court rule on relator’s request to obtain a copy 

of the appellate record.1

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Lawrence Floyd Miller III, cause 

number 74039, pending in the 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County, 

Texas, the Honorable Justin R. Gilbert presiding.
2

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Lloyd and Countiss.

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
The Board of Directors
Rayovac Corporation


         We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-39239, 333-42443, 333-41815) on Form S-8 of Rayovac Corporation of our
reports dated October 28, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of
Rayovac Corporation and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' deficit, and cash flows for
the year ended September 30, 1997, and related schedule, which reports appear in
the September 30, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Rayovac Corporation.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
December 19, 1997
EXHIBIT 23.1

                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-26067) pertaining to the Special Metals Corporation
1997 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan of our report dated February 22, 1999,
except for Note 6, as to which the date is March 31, 1999, with respect to the
financial statements and schedule of Special Metals Corporation included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
---------------------
Buffalo, New York
March 31, 1999

                                      -72-