MATTER OF D 

In DEPORTATION Proceedings 

A-10976326 

Decided by Board May 25, 1960 

Deportability—Section 241(a)(1)—Petty offense exemption not applicable. 

Petty offense exemption in section 4 of Act of September 3, 1954 held inapplicable to deportation charge under section 241 (a) (4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

CHARGE • 

Order: Act of 1952—Section 241 (a) (4) [8 U.S.C. 1251(a) (4) J—Convicted 

and sentenced for a year or more for a crime involving moral turpitude committed within five years after entry, to wit, forgery, in violation of section 470 of the Penal Code of California. 

BEFORE THE BOARD 

Discussion: The case is before us by certification. The special 

inquiry officer ordered the respondent deported upon the ground 

stated above and certified the case. 

The respondent, a native and last a national of Hungary, was 

admitted to the United States for permanent residence on January 

16, 1957, and last entered the United States after a visit of 2 days 

to Canada in the spring of 1959. On August 13, 1959, the respondent was convicted on a plea of guilty of the crime of forgery (section 470, Penal Code of California) and for an offence committed 

on or about July 2, 1959. He was sentenced to imprisonment in the 

county jail for a term of one year, and he was placed on probation 

for -2 years. The sentence was suspended on the condition that the 

respondent spend the first 3 months in the county jail. Where 

confinement is to be in the county jail, forgery is punishable by 

imprisonment for not more than one year (section 473, California 

Penal Code). 

One convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude who has received a suspended sentence to a year or more comes within the 

terms of section 241(a) (4) and is deportable (Matter of V 7 

I. & N. Dec. 577). The examining officer and the special inquiry 

officer believe that section 4 of the Act of September 3, 1954 can 

658 
be used to remove such an alien from the deportable class. We do 

not agree. We believe that section 4 may be used where the charge 

is based on excludability under section 212(a) (9) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, but not where the charge is based on 

section 241(a) (4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Broadly speaking, section 4 provides that if the "punishment 

actually imposed" upon a convicted person is to imprisonment of 

no more than six months, that person is not inadmissible to the 

United States despite the provisions of section 212(a) (9) relating 

to the exclusion of aliens convicted of crime (Matter of 

6 I. & N. Dec. 331). The special inquiry officer attempted to determine if a suspended sentence to one year's imprisonment or the 3 

months' imprisonment actually served was the punishment actually 

imposed in the instant case. We do not believe his inquiry was 

pertinent. The provisions of section 4 were not meant to have any 

relation to a charge based on section 241(a) (4). We find no alternative to this conclusion in view of the fact that a sentence to 

imprisonment for one year which is suspended is a proper ground 

for the deportation under section 241(a) (4) even though the alien 

has never been confined. Thus, if the alien in the instant ease had 

not been 'required to spend 3 months in jail as part of the suspended 

sentence he received, he would clearly be deportable. It would be 

illogical to say that because he is required to serve part of his suspended sentence, he should be in a better position than the alien 

whose suspended sentence does not call for some confinement. 

Decisions of this Board relating to the application of section 4 

must be viewed in light of the fact that either the charge dealt with 

section 212(a) (9) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

U.S.C. 1182(a) (9)), or the case dealt with questions of good moral 

character. 

After the respondent's entry in the spring of 1959, and within 

five years after that entry, he committed a crime and was sentenced 

to confinement for a year. He is deportable under section 241 

(a) (4). 

Order: It is ordered that the respondent be deported from the 

United States in the manner provided by law on the charge contained in the order to show cause. 

659