alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 5527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-394]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee will meet in 
closed session on March 6, 2008 from 0800 hrs until 2030 and March 7, 
2008 from 0900 hrs until 1330 at the Pentagon.
    The purpose of the meeting is to provide the Secretary of Defense, 
Deputy Secretary of Defense and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy 
with independent, informed advice on major matters of defense policy. 
The Board will hold classified discussions on national security 
matters.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law No. 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App II (1982)], it has 
been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552B(c)(1) (1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to 
the public.

    Dated: January 24, 2008.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 08-394 Filed 1-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5000-06-M
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5784 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5784

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 2650 North Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Milwaukee, 
Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the ``Vel R. Phillips Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VEL R. PHILLIPS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2650 North Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Milwaukee, 
Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the ``Vel R. Phillips Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Vel R. 
Phillips Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Meeting of the 

Workgroup on Science Issues 

April 17, 2012 

Cincinnati Airport Marriott 

2395 Progress Dr. 

Hebron, KY 41048 

859-586-0166 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

9:00 a.m. Eastern Time 

Welcome and roll-call 

Presentation 

SENES: Presentation on Dose and Dose Rate Effectiveness Factors 

Discussion 

 Discussion of SENES findings 

 Framing topic in the context of the EEOICPA and probability distributions 

for DDREF for the following scenarios: 

o Low-LET radiation 

 Acute dose 

 Solid cancers 

 Leukemia 

 Chronic dose 

 Solid cancer 

 Leukemia 

o High-LET radiation 

 Acute dose 

 Solid cancers 

 Leukemia 

 Chronic dose 

 Solid cancers 

 Leukemia 

 SENES recommendations 

 WG – Summary of issues regarding DDREF for high- and low-LET radiation 

Adjourn
Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) 

Updates

LaVon B. Rutherford, CHP

SEC Health Physics Team Leader

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Purpose

 Update the Advisory Board

• SEC Summary

• Petitions in qualification

• Petitions under evaluation

• Petitions currently under Board review

• Potential SEC petitions (83.14)

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
SEC Summary Table

 Petitions received 231

 Petitions in qualification process 3

 Petitions qualified for evaluation 140 

• NIOSH evaluation in progress 0

• NIOSH evaluation completed 140

• Reports with the Advisory Board 12

• Petitions not qualifying for evaluation 88

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Petitions in Qualification

 SEC 0228 Y-12 Plant

• All machinist in a number of bldgs.

• Time period 1/01/1962 through 12/31/1991

 SEC 0230 Bliss and Laughlin

• All medart operators, foremen, and special 

finish employees

• Time period 1/01/1981 through 1/31/1999

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Petitions in Qualification cont.

 SEC 0231 Pinellas Plant

• All employees

• Time period 1/01/1956 through 12/22/1997

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Currently under Board Review

 Awaiting initial Board action:

• SEC-219, Idaho National Lab.

• SEC-221, Lawrence Livermore National Lab. 

(Presented to Advisory Board this meeting)

• SEC-223, Carborundum

• SEC-224, Argonne National Lab. -West

(Presented to Advisory Board this meeting)

• SEC-225, Blockson Chemical residual period

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Sites with remaining evaluation periods awaiting action

Fernald 

(SEC-0046)

1984-1989 Sandia National

Laboratories -

Albuquerque 

(SEC-0188)

1995-2011

Los Alamos National 

Laboratory 

(SEC-0109)

1996-2005 Santa Susana Field

Laboratory 

(SEC-0093)

1965

Rocky Flats Plant

(SEC-0192)

1984-1989 Savannah River Site 

(SEC-0103)

1973-2007

Grand Junction 

Facilities

(SEC-0175)

1986-2010 

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

Currently under Board Review cont.
Potential SEC Petitions (83.14)

 Sandia National Laboratories –

Albuquerque (1945-48)

 Dayton Project Monsanto (modify based on 

change in facility designation)

 Changed to a Department of Energy facility

 Add the 9-month period when operations 

were being shifted from “The Dayton Project” 

to Mound

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Questions?

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Locan, Inc., for the quarter ending June 30, 2011, I, Ronald D. Long, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1. Such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Locan, Inc.  Dated:  August 11, 2011   LOCAN, INC.  By:/s/  Ronald D. Long
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Ronald C. Martin,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Oak ValleyBancorp on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Oak Valley Bancorp.

 
| Date: August 13,  2009 | By:    | /s/    RONALD  C. MARTIN |
|-----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                        | Name:  | **Ronald  C. Martin**                        |
|                        | Title: | **Chief  Executive Officer**                 |

 

I, Richard A. McCarty,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Oak ValleyBancorp on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of Oak Valley Bancorp.

 
| Date: August 13,  2009 | By:    | /s/    RICHARD  A. MCCARTY |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Name:  | **Richard  A. McCarty**                        |
|                        | Title: | **Chief  Financial Officer**                   |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 19, 2016

No. 04-15-00820-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN EVERETT KOONTZ, DECEASED,

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-14-0000048

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on April 15, 20126. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). On April 14, 

2016, Appellant filed an unopposed first motion for a thirty-two day extension of time to file his

brief until May 16, 2016. 

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on May 16, 2016.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of April, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

     **18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PRECISION PETROLEUM CORPORATION (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sharon Farris, Treasurer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 12, 2009

By: ***/s/******Sharon Farris***

Sharon Farris

Treasurer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer

----
AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
                               SERVICING AGREEMENT


            THIS AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SERVICING
AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into as of the 6th day of September,
1995, by and among World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation ("WOFC")
and National Auto Finance Company, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (the
"Company").

            WHEREAS, WOFC and Company entered into an Amended and Restated
Servicing Agreement dated the 5th day of December, 1994 ("Servicing Agreement");
and

            WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Servicing Agreement as set
forth herein below:

            1. Article IV, paragraph 4, shall be amended as follows:

                  The second sentence of such paragraph shall be deleted in its
entirety.

            2. Article V, paragraph 1, line 2 shall be amended as follows:

                  "$12.30" shall be replaced with "$12.70."

            3. Except as herein specifically amended and modified, the Servicing
Agreement is unchanged and continues in full force and effect, and the parties
hereby confirm and ratify the existence of each and every term, condition, and
covenant contained therein, to the same extent as though the same were set out
herein in full.

            4. This Agreement may be executed in a number of identical
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. In making proof of this
instrument, it shall not be necessary for any party to account for all
counterparts, and it shall be sufficient for a party to produce one such
counterpart.

            5. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the
benefit of WOFC and Company and their permitted successors and/or assigns.



DAFS03...:\97\64897\0001\2058\AMD4168W.290
<PAGE>
            This Amendment is due to be effective as of October 1, 1995.


                                    WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.


WITNESS:                            By:

                                    Its:


                                    NATIONAL AUTO FINANCE COMPANY,
                                    L.P.


WITNESS:                            By:

                                    Its:






                                     2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APP EAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

WESLEY B. LUCAS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-2051

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 8, 2016

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Renee A. Roche, Judge.

Wesley B. Lucas, Monticello, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, A ssistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Wesley B. Lucas, appeals the summary denial of his motion for

postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Crimina l Procedure 3.850, which

contains several numbered claims. We conclude that the record conclusively refutes

claims two, three, and five. Accordingly, we affirm as to thos e claims. However, the

record attachments do not conclusively refute claims one and fo ur. As to those two2 claims, we reverse the order under review and remand this case to the trial court to

attach portions of the record conclusively refuting those claim s or to hold an evidentiary

hearing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVER SED in part; REMANDED.

SAWAYA, BERGER and LA MBERT, JJ., concur.
Status of Upcoming SEC

Petitions

LaVon B. Rutherford, CHP

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

August 2011

Richland, WA
Purpose

 Provide an update to the Advisory Boa

the current current number of qualified qualified petitio

petitio

under evaluation and sites being evalu

through through the 83.14 process. process.

 Provide Provide SEC information information to the Adviso

Adviso

Board in support of its preparations fo

future Work Group sessions sessions and Advis

Advis

Board meetings.
SEC Summary Table

(as of August 1, 2011)

 Petitions received  Petitions Petitions in qualification qualification process process  Petitions qualified for evaluation 

• NIOSH evaluation evaluation in progress progress 1• NIOSH evaluation completed 112

– SEC Evaluation Reports

with the Advisory Board

for recommendation 15

 Petitions Petitions not qualifying qualifying for evaluation evaluation Note: Petitions not qualifying include five petitions received prio

rule becoming final and Petition 34 where the site was de‐
SEC Petition Currently in the

Evaluation Process

 Clinton Engineering Works (CEW)

• All guards and service workers who worked in o

the warehouses at the Elza Gate area of Clinton

Engineering Works from January 1, 1943 through 

1947

• Date received: July 8, 2010

• Expected completion: NIOSH is waiting for a faci

designation determination from DOL
SEC Petition Evaluation Contin

 The following sites have evaluations that we

partially partially completed completed and NIOSH has committe

committe

continue evaluation

• Grand Junction Operations Office

—February 1, 1975 through July 31, 2010

—Expected completion: October 2011

• Sandia National Laboratory, Albuquerque, NM

—Post 1960 period—Expect de compl ti e on: March 2012
Oa e at o a abo ato

SEC Petitions in Qualificatio

 The following sites have petitions unde

qualification

• Pinellas Plant (Clearwater, Florida)• Hanford (Richland, Washington)• Sandia National Laboratory (Albuquerque

• Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Oak Ridg

• Titanium Alloys Manufacturing (Niagara F
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, J. Bryant Kirkland III, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CDSI Holdings Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) [intentionally omitted]     (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (d) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:March 31, 2006              /s/ J. Bryant Kirkland III   J. Bryant Kirkland III   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
--------------------------
                           KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP
                           --------------------------
                         1800 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
                                   2ND FLOOR
                          WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036-1800

                            TELEPHONE (202) 778-9000
                            FACSIMILE (202) 778-9100
                                   www.kl.com

                                 August 9, 1999

INVESCO Bond Funds, Inc.
7800 East Union Avenue
Denver, Colorado  80236

Dear Sir or Madam:

      You have  requested  our opinion,  as counsel to INVESCO Bond Funds,  Inc.
(the "Company"), a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland
on April 2, 1993, as to certain matters  regarding the issuance of Shares of the
Company in connection with the  reorganization  of INVESCO Tax-Free Bond Fund, a
series of a Maryland  corporation;  (the "Acquired  Fund") into the Company,  as
provided  for in the  Agreement  and Plan of  Conversion  and  Termination  (the
"Plan") between the Company and INVESCO Tax-Free Income Funds, Inc. on behalf of
the Acquired  Fund.  The Plan  provides for the Acquired Fund to transfer all of
its assets to a new series of the  Company  (the  "Acquiring  Fund") in exchange
solely for the issuance of Shares and the  Acquiring  Fund's  assumption  of the
liabilities  of the Acquired  Fund.  (As used in this letter,  the term "Shares"
means  the  shares  of  common  stock  of the  Acquiring  Fund to be  issued  in
connection with the Plan.)

      We have, as counsel,  participated in various  corporate and other matters
relating to the Company. We have examined copies,  either certified or otherwise
proved to be genuine, of its Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws,  the minutes
of  meetings  of its Board of  Directors  and other  documents  relating  to the
organization  and operation of the Company,  and we are generally  familiar with
its  business  affairs.  Based upon the  foregoing,  it is our opinion  that the
Shares of the Company may be legally and validly  issued in accordance  with the
Company's  Articles of Incorporation  and By-Laws and subject to compliance with
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  the Investment  Company Act of 1940, as
amended,  and applicable state laws regulating the offer and sale of securities,
and  when so  issued,  the  Shares  will  be  legally  issued,  fully  paid  and
non-assessable.

      We  hereby  consent  to the  filing of this  opinion  in  connection  with
Post-Effective  Amendment No. 39 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form
N-1A  (File  No.  002-57151)  to be  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.  We also  consent to the  reference  to our firm  under the  caption
"Legal Counsel" in the Statement of Additional  Information filed as part of the
Registration Statement.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   /s/Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP
                                   -----------------------------
                                   Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP