alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ERIC SEYMOUR WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:11cv299-RH/WCS

BRAD JOHNSON, 

OFFICER J. LEMAIR,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On June 20, 2011, the pro se Plaintiff initiated this case by filing an in forma

pauperis motion, doc. 2, and civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, doc. 1. On

June 22, 2011, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, doc. 4. An order was entered on

June 29th, granting Plaintiff's in forma pauperis motion and directing Plaintiff to file a

second amended complaint, doc. 5. That order was not returned to the Court as

undeliverable. It must be assumed that Plaintiff received the order. 

Plaintiff was directed to submit the amended complaint, and provide a response

clarifying his income no later than July 22, 2011. Doc. 5. Plaintiff was warned that

failure to comply might result in a recommendation of dismissal of this case. Id. Plaintiff

has not responded by the deadline provided.

Case 4:11-cv-00299-RH-WCS Document 6 Filed 08/10/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Plaintiff has failed to comply with a court order and

appears to have abandoned this litigation. This case should be dismissed without

prejudice. 

Plaintiff shall have a 15 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file a motion for reconsideration. This will also afford

Plaintiff a final opportunity to show good cause for his failure to respond and

demonstrate his intent to proceed. 

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this action be

DISMISSED for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute. 

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on August 10, 2011.

 S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:11cv299-RH/WCS

Case 4:11-cv-00299-RH-WCS Document 6 Filed 08/10/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as
chief executive officer of GigOptix, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) The Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10- Q for the three months ended July 5, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) The information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended July 5, 2009 fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This certification has not been and shall not
be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 18, 2009 |  | /S/ AVISHAY S. KATZ    
|                      |  | Dr. Avi (Avishay) Katz 
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
# C_2011222EN.01000201.xml

| 28.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 July 2011

2011/C 222/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4446 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4525 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88310 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0632 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1586 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7615 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,285 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0058 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2308 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4399 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3087 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3625 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2550 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6530 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7366 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 517,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6111 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3080 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4600 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 252,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2601 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,902 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,6750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,962 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2453 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8134 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,6850 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4446

JPY

Japanese yen

112,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4525

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88310

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0632

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1586

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7615

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,285

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0058

RON

Romanian leu

4,2308

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4399

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3087

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3625

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2550

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6530

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7366

KRW

South Korean won

1 517,64

ZAR

South African rand

9,6111

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3080

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4600

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 252,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2601

PHP

Philippine peso

60,902

RUB

Russian rouble

39,6750

THB

Thai baht

42,962

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2453

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8134

INR

Indian rupee

63,6850

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
SUFFICIENT ACCURACY

COWORKER DOSE MODELING

Jim Melius, Jim Neton
REGULATION

– Per 42 CFR § 83.13 (c)(1)(i), Radiation doses can be 

reconstructed with sufficient accuracy if NIOSH has 

established that it has access to sufficient information 

to estimate the maximum radiation dose, for every 

type of cancer for which radiation doses are 

reconstructed, that could have been incurred in 

plausible circumstances by any member of the class 

or if NIOSH has established that it has access to 

sufficient information to estimate the radiation doses 

of members of the class more precisely than an 

estimate of the maximum radiation dose. 


CONSIDERATION OF EXPOSURE 

POTENTIAL

WHAT ACCURACY IS SUFFICIENT?

FOR LOW EXPOSURE POTENTIAL – IS LESS 

ACCURACY SUFFICIENT? 

EXAMPLE – RESIDUAL PERIOD. 

PROBLEM WITH EVALUATING 

COWORKER MODELS FOR 

STRATIFICATION
Co Worker Models – General Issues

NOT INDIVIDUAL DOSE 

RECONSTRUCTION – USING ONE GROUP’S 

EXPOSURE TO PREDICT THAT OF OTHER 

PEOPLE

LOTS OF STATISTICAL ISSUES

HOW COMPLETE IS DATA SET BEING 

USED 

HOW MUCH DATA ARE BEING MODELED
ISSUES CONT.

OPERATIONAL STABILITY DURING TIME 

PERIODS IN QUESTIONS

SAMPLE SIZE (S)

RANGE OF EXPOSURES BEING MODELED

USUAL DATA ROBUSTNESS ISSUE

STRATIFICATION
POTENTIAL ISSUES WITH 

STRATIFICATION EVALUATION

REPRESENTATIVENESS AND 

COMPLETENESS OF DATA

SIMILAR SAMPLING PROTOCOLS

SIMILAR OPERATIONS

USE OF OPOS (ONE PERSON ONE VALUE)

CONFIDENCE LEVELS USED

SMALL SAMPLE SIZES /POWER (RULE OF 

30)
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three-month period ending March 31, 2010 of Secure Window Blinds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Anthony Pizzacalla, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








/s/ Anthony Pizzacalla


Anthony Pizzacalla


President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,


Principal Financial Officer and Director








Date:  March 3, 2011
Exhibit
32.01 and Exhibit 32.02





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002





I, Denny
W. Nestripke, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that the Quarterly Report of
Millstream Ventures, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008:





1.
            Fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, and





2.
            The
      information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of Millstream
      Ventures, Inc.











By:
            
            /s/  Denny
      W. NestripkeName:
            
            Denny
      W. NestripkeTitle:
            
            Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:
            
            October
      27, 2008











A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained
by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0427 RISE MAY COOLEY, Co - Petit io ner AND Appellee, vs. HARVEY LYNN COOLEY Co - Petit io ner and Appellant. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT
This appeal being subj ect to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parti es having failed to j oint ly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Anita Roessmann,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appo int me nt a s mediators fo r Domesti c Relati ons appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to co nduct th e mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e time peri ods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the dat e of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s September 17, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood , Cl erk o f th e Supreme Court c: Rise May Cooley, Brad Lee Belke, Anita Roessmann 09/17/2020
Case Number: DA 20-0427
|   | a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Webdigs, Inc. for the quarter ended April 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Webdigs, Inc. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| June 20, 2011 |   | /s/ Robert A. Buntz, Jr. |
|---------------|--------|--------------------------|
|          |   | Robert A. Buntz, Jr.     |
|          |   | Chief Executive Officer  |

| June 20, 2011 |   | /s/ Edward Wicker       |
|---------------|--------|-------------------------|
|          |   | Edward Wicker           |
|          |   | Chief Financial Officer |

----
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 111
 

Teleconference Meeting
 

May 25, 2016 

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537 

Participant Code: 9933701 

11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) Start 

• Roll-call – Mr. Katz, DFO 

• Welcome – Dr. Melius, Chair 

• March Board Meeting Final Vote Tallies – Mr. Katz, DFO 

• Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition Status Update – Mr. Rutherford, DCAS 

• Updates from Work Groups and Subcommittees (as necessary) – WG/SC Chairs 

• Plans for the August 2016 Board Meeting – All Members 

Adjourn
| (1)   | the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tupper, Inc. for the quarter      ended August 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended August 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Tupper,    Inc. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Zandra Grace      Hernandez                                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                           |
| Name:  | Zandra      Grace Hernandez                                                    |
|   |                                                                           |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer,Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                           |
| Date:  | September      24, 2008                                                        |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Credex Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: August 24, 2011

By: /s/ Denise Leonardo
    _____________________

    Denise Leonardo
    President (CEO)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Credex Corporation and
will be retained by Credex Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32**

**ISONICS CORPORATION**

**Certificationpursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 of theChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K/A-1 (the “Report”) of IsonicsCorporation (the “Company”) for the year ended April 30, 2007, each of theundersigned John Sakys, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and KennethJ. Deane, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledgeand belief:

1.     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| August 28, 2007 | /s/ JOHN SAKYS                          |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------|
|            | John Sakys,*Chief Executive Officer*    |
| August 28, 2007 | /s/  KENNETH DEANE                      |
|            | Kenneth Deane,*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Special Exposure Cohort 

Updates 

LaVon B. Rutherford, CHP

NIOSH

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

March 2015

Richland, WA 
Purpose

 Update the Advisory Board

 Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) summary 

 Petitions in qualification

 Petitions under Evaluation

 Petitions currently under Board review

 Potential SEC petitions (83.14)

 Provide updates for future Board work group 

sessions and meeting preparations 
SEC Summary Table

(as of March 16, 2015)

 Petitions received 226

 Petitions in qualification process 3 

 Petitions qualified for evaluation 138

• NIOSH evaluation in progress 3 

• NIOSH evaluation completed 135

– SEC Evaluation Reports 

 with the Advisory Board 

 for recommendation 12 

 Petitions not qualifying for evaluation 85

Note: Petitions not qualifying include five petitions received prior to the 

rule becoming final and Petition 34 where the site was de-listed. 
Petitions in Qualification

• SEC-0222, Grand Junction Operations Office 

Grand junction, CO (1986-1990)

• SEC-0223, Carborundum Company, Niagara 

Falls, NY (1943-1976)

• SEC-0225, Blockson Chemical Co, Joliet, IL 

(1959-1985, Residual Period)
Petitions under Evaluation

• SEC-0217, Westinghouse Electric Corp., 

Bloomfield, NJ (1950-2001, Residual Period) 

• Expected Completion: April 2015

• SEC-0221, Lawrence Livermore National 

Laboratory, Livermore, CA (1974-2014) 

• Expected Completion: Nov. 2015 

• SEC-0224, Argonne National Lab (West), 

Scoville, ID (1951-1979)

• Expected Completion: Nov. 2015
Currently under Board Review 

 Awaiting initial Board action:

• SEC-0210, Kansas City Plant

• SEC-0175, Grand Junction (Presented to Advisory 

Board this meeting)

• SEC-0216, Dow Chemical Co, Pittsburgh 

(Presented to Advisory Board this meeting) 
Currently under Board Review cont.. 

 Awaiting initial Board action:

• SEC-0219, Idaho National Lab (Presented to 

Advisory Board this meeting) 

• SEC-0226, Hanford (83.14) (Presented to Advisory 

Board this meeting)
Sites with remaining evaluation periods awaiting action

Fernald 

(SEC-0046)

1984-1989 Sandia National Laboratories - 

Albuquerque 

(SEC-0188)

1995-2011

Hanford 

(SEC-0057)

1984-1990 Santa Susana Field Laboratory 

(SEC-0093)

1965

Los Alamos National 

Laboratory (SEC-0109)

1996-2005 Savannah River Site

(SEC-0103)

1973-2007

Rocky Flats Plant 

(SEC-0192)

1984-1989
Potential SEC Petitions (83.14) 

 Sandia National Laboratories – Albuquerque (1945-48)

 Dayton Project Monsanto (modify based on change in 

facility designation)

• Changed to a Department of Energy facility

• Add the 9-month period when operations were being shifted 

from “The Dayton Project” to Mound
Questions?
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

NIOSH Program Update

Stuart Hinnefeld, CHP

Director

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support 

Meeting of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

December 13, 2017 | Albuquerque, NM
Updates

— OTIB-049, ICRP, and Super S solubility class

— JOTG Annual Meeting (October, phone) 

— ATL sponsored DR and SEC Workshop in Cincinnati 

(September)

— Public meeting in conjunction with Advisory Board on Toxic 

Substances and Worker Health meeting in Santa Fe 

(November)

— Authorized representative workshop in Jacksonville, FL 

(December)
Cases

— 48,247 cases to NIOSH from Department of 

Labor (DOL)

– 1,248 at NIOSH for dose reconstruction (DR)

– 827 administratively closed

— 46,172 returned to DOL
Cases cont.

—41,193 submitted with DR to DOL

—1,529 pulled from DR by DOL

—3,450 pulled for SEC
Cases cont.

— 1,248 active cases at NIOSH for DR

– 372 in DR process

– 274 initial draft DR reports with claimants

– 602 cases in DR development
PC Summary

—41,193 DRs sent back for final adjudication

—11,492 PC ≥ 50%

—29,701 PC < 50%
DOE records Requests

—155 outstanding

— 0 more than 60 days
Summary of first 20,000 DRs cont.

—19,564 claims at DOL

– 770 pulled for DOL issues 

– 2,062 pulled for SEC 

—16,732 submitted with DR
Summary of first 20,000 DRs cont.

—403 claims at NIOSH

– 357 administratively closed 

– 19 with claimants (2 initial, 17 DOL returns) 

– 27 DRs in process (1 initial, 26 DOL returns)

— 33 claim numbers deleted
Questions
|   | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 12, 2011 | By:    | /s/ David P. Lieberman                                                                       |
|------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | David P. Lieberman                                                                           |
|                   |   | Acting Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
Summary – ORAUT-OTIB-0022, Rev. 00 1 SC&A – January 20, 2011

Overview of

GUIDANCE ON WOUND MODELING FOR

INTERNAL DOSE RECONSTRUCTION

(ORAUT-OTIB-0022, Rev. 0) 

Workers at many Department of Energy and Atomic Weapons Employer facilities have the 

potential to receive a radiation dose to their internal organs through exposure to radioactive 

material. Radioactive material may enter the body through any of three pathways: inhalation, 

ingestion, and skin contact. The latter pathway is the subject of the Technical Information 

Bulletin (TIB) Guidance on Wound Modeling for Internal Dose Reconstruction (ORAUT-OTIB0022). 

Dose reconstructors use a computer code, or specialized computer program, called IMBA 

(Integrated Modules for Bioassay Analysis) to facilitate calculation of internal doses to the body 

or specific organs using the methods and assumptions recommended by the International 

Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). This Technical Information Bulletin provides 

guidance in calculating internal doses resulting from radioactive material contamination of a 

wound. 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS RESULTING FROM THE TECHNICAL REVIEW

The technical contractor for the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (the Board) 

reviewed the TIB and produced no findings or comments. 

RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS

The Board finds the TIB acceptable.