alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5783 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5783

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To provide a safe harbor for financial institutions that maintain a 
 customer account at the request of a Federal or State law enforcement 
                                agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cooperate with Law Enforcement 
Agencies and Watch Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. SAFE HARBOR WITH RESPECT TO KEEP OPEN LETTERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 53 of title 31, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 5333. Safe harbor with respect to keep open letters
    ``(a) In General.--With respect to a customer account of a 
financial institution, if a Federal, State, Tribal, or local law 
enforcement agency requests, in writing, the financial institution to 
keep such account open--
            ``(1) the financial institution shall not be liable under 
        this subchapter for maintaining such account consistent with 
        the parameters of the request; and
            ``(2) no Federal or State department or agency may take any 
        adverse supervisory action under this subchapter with respect 
        to the financial institution for maintaining such account 
        consistent with the parameters of the request.
    ``(b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section may be 
construed--
            ``(1) from preventing a Federal or State department or 
        agency from verifying the validity of a written request 
        described under subsection (a) with the Federal, State, Tribal, 
        or local law enforcement agency making the written request; or
            ``(2) to relieve a financial institution from complying 
        with any reporting requirements, including the reporting of 
        suspicious transactions under section 5318(g).
    ``(c) Letter Termination Date.--For purposes of this section, any 
written request described under subsection (a) shall include a 
termination date after which such request shall no longer apply.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of contents for chapter 53 of 
title 31, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item 
relating to section 5332 the following:

``5333. Safe harbor with respect to keep open letters.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 15**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-104171, 333-52016, 333-114797, and 333-142421 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 23, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of CNHGlobal N.V. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption on January 1, 2007 of a new standard of accounting for income tax uncertainties, as well as the adoption on January 1, 2009 ofa new standard of accounting and reporting for noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements), and the effectiveness of CNH Global N.V.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F ofCNH Global N.V. for the year ended December 31, 2009. 

*DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP*

Chicago, Illinois 

February 23, 2010
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Teleconference of the

Oak Ridge National Laboratory (X-10)

June 30, 2021

Videoconference:

Join ZoomGov Meeting 

https://cdc.zoomgov.com/j/16067633819?pwd=RUdiYXlZZHFKanpJOHZrcGJIbTlaZz09

Meeting ID: 160 6763 3819 

Passcode: ABRWH#01

Teleconference:

Phone: +1 (646) 828-7666 (U.S. East Coast) 

Phone: +1 (669) 254-5252 (U.S. West Coast) 

Meeting ID: 160 6763 3819 

Meeting Passcode: 98685439 

10:30 a.m. (Eastern Time) Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

1. Overview of ORNL (X-10) efforts

2. NIOSH/ORAU RPRT-0090 (March 2018): Monitoring Feasibility Evaluation for Exotic 

Radionuclides Produced by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Isotopes Division

a. NIOSH presentation of RPRT-0090

b. SC&A presentation of key review and response documents to date:

i. SC&A Review of RPRT-0090 (October 2019): SC&A’s Evaluation of 

RPRT-0090, “Monitoring Feasibility Evaluation for Exotic Radionuclides 

Produced by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Isotopes Division,” 

Revision 00 

ii. NIOSH Response to SC&A Review (June 2020): NIOSH Response to 

SC&A Evaluation of SEC-00189 ORNL X-10 ORAUT-RPRT-009 

iii. SC&A Response to NIOSH Response to SC&A’s Review of RPRT-0090 

(January 2021): “Review of NIOSH Response to SC&A Comments on 

ORAUT-RPRT-0090 re Monitoring Feasibility Evaluation for Exotic 

Radionuclides Produced by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Isotopes 

Division” 

c. Workgroup discussion 

3. Petitioner comments (optional to petitioner) 

4. WG discussion: 

a. August board meeting session plans 

b. Follow-up actions 

Adjourn
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
October 3, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60287 Summary Calendar

GHEREZGIHER TECLE EMBEYE,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A78 881 262

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Gherezgiher Tecle Embeye, a native of Ethiopia and citizen of

Eritria, petitions for review of an order issued by the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the

immigration ju dge’s (IJ) decision to deny his applications for

asylum, withholdi ng of removal, and relief under the Convention

Against Torture (CAT). Embeye challenges the finding of both the

IJ and BIA that he lacked credibility. Embeye also argues that he

has established his eligibility for as ylum or withholding of

removal. Embeye has abandoned any argument he might have raisedNo. 04-60287 -2-
regarding the denial of his motion for protection under the CAT by

failing to challenge the decision in his petition for review. S ee

Witter v. INS , 113 F.3d 549, 554 (5th Cir. 1997).

Both issues raised by Embeye would require this court to

review and overturn a determination by the IJ and BIA as to his

credibility as a witness. We may not “substitute our judgment for

that of the BIA or IJ with respect to the credibility of the

witnesses or ultimate factual findings based on credibility

determinations.” S ee Chun v. INS , 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994).

Accordingly, Embeye’s petition for review is DENIED.
10‐Year Program Review Upd

Stuart L. Hinnefeld, CHP

Director

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

December 2012

Knoxville, TN
Concerning Dose Reconstructi

 DCAS continues to work with the Subcommittee o

Reconstruction Reviews on Dose Reconstruction (

Quality Assurance/Quality Control issues

 DCAS has implemented a blind review process to 

for routine evaluation of DR quality

 DCAS is evaluating selected DR review findings to

attempt to determine reasons for findings

 DCAS has eliminated certain overestimating techn

when it could be accomplished in a cost‐effective

manner
Concerning Quality of Servic

 DCAS has revised communication products

(letters and Fact Sheets) to make them mo

readily understandable (Plain Language)

 White Papers and other supporting docum

are posted on the DCAS Web site in time fo

Work Group meetings when they are discu

 DCAS has modified the Board page of the W

site to facilitate navigation
Concerning Timeliness

 DCAS provides incentives for its dose

reconstruction contractor to complete 90% 

initial claims within 5 months of receiving 

claim data (down from 6 months in previo

period)

 DCAS provides incentives for its dose

reconstruction contractor to complete 90% 

rework claims within 60 days of receipt whadditional data is not needed
Concerning SEC Petitions

 DCAS is reviewing recent HHS decisions in 

to draft a common understanding of “suffi

accuracy”

 DCAS has not been able to sort SEC decisio

into “scientific” and “policy” decisions, but 

drafting documents that make SEC Evaluat

Report decisions more transparent
Concerning Quality of Scienc

 DCAS and ORAU are developing a process for

minimizing inconsistencies between documents

 DCAS is using Savannah River Site claim data to 

a validation exercise for our approach to cowor

modeling

 In order to better characterize “claimant favora

DCAS is evaluating the impact of claimant favorpractices described in the special edition of the 

Physics Journal
10‐Year Review Progress Repor

DCAS will implement a 10‐Year Review page 

DCAS Web site that includes the reports from 

10‐year review, the follow up action items fr

review, and periodic progress reports on thoaction items in response to those

recommendations
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00696-CV

In the Matter of D. M.

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF BELL COUNTY

NO. 62,606, HONORABLE EDWARD S. JOHNSON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

We grant appellant D.M.’s motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)(1). The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: August 20, 2009
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health - Meeting 154

October 12, 2023

Teleconference Phone: +1 866 659 0537

Participant Code: 9933701

11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) Start

• Roll call - Dr. Rashaun Roberts, DFO

• Welcome - Dr. Henry Anderson, ABRWH Chair

• Update on Cybersecurity Modernization Initiative - Mr. Grady Calhoun, DCAS

• Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Status Update - Mr. Chuck Nelson, DCAS

• Updates from Workgroups and Subcommittees - WG/SC Chairs

• Plans for the December 2023 Board Meeting - All Members

1:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) Adjourn
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form
10-Q of EcoEmissions Solutions Inc. for the Quarter Ended August 31, 2009, I,
Thomas Crom, Chief Financial Officer of Resource Group, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended
      August 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-Q for the Period Ended August 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      EcoEmissions Solutions Inc.

|By: | /s/ Thomas Crom        
|--- | -----------------------
|    | Thomas Crom            
|    | Chief Financial Officer

Dated: October 20, 2009

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Adelphia Recovery Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey A. Brodsky, a memberof Quest Turnaround Advisors, LLC, Trust Administrator of the Trust, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

By:  Quest Turnaround Advisors, LLC

as Trust Administrator ofthe Adelphia Recovery Trust

 
| /s/ Jeffrey A. Brodsky |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Jeffrey A. Brodsky     |   |
| Member                 |   |
|                   |   |
|                   |   |
| Date:  August 9, 2010  |   |

 

----
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 D0 40 9 . W I HLY HARPO v . I NTERMARK MANAGEMENT.

W i h l y Harp o , p ro ceed i ng p ro s e, fi l ed t h i s ap p l icat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary rev i ew,

s e e k i n g t o ap p eal an o rd er en t ered b y t h e Ri ch m o n d Co u nt y M ag i s t rat e Co u rt i n a d i s p o s s es s o ry

act i o n

. W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

“ Th e o n l y av en ue o f ap p eal a v a i l ab l e fro m [a] m ag i st rat e co u rt ju d g m en t i s
p ro v id ed b y OCGA § 1 5 -1 0 -4 1 (b ) (1 ), wh ich al l o ws fo r a d e n o v o ap p eal to t h e s t at e

o r s u peri o r co u rt .” Ha n d ler v. Hu l s ey , 1 9 9 G a. Ap p. 75 1
, 7 5 1 (4 0 6 SE2 d 2 25 ) (1 9 9 1 ).
Th u s, t h i s Co u rt m ay ad d res s m ag i st rat e co urt m at t ers on l y i f t h ey h av e al read y b een

rev i ewed b y t h e st at e o r s u p eri o r co u rt

. See W es t wi n d Co r

p. v. W as h i n g t on Fed

. S &

L As sn

. , 19 5 Ga. Ap p

. 4 1 1
, 4 1 1 (1 ) ( 3 9 3 S E 2 d 4 79 ) (1 9 9 0 ). Ab s en t an ap p eal ab l e

s t at e o r s u p eri o r co urt o rd er, we are u n ab l e t o o b tai n ju ri s d i ct i o n ov er t h i s ap p l i cat i o n, wh i ch i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. July 27, 2021

07/27/2021
**Exhibit 32.01**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of iGATE Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Phaneesh Murthy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: February 17, 2011 

 

*This certification accompanies and is being “furnished” with this Periodic Report, shall not be deemed “filed” by iGATECorporation (the “Company”) for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that Section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Periodic Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Teleconference Meeting of the

Pinellas Work Group

March 10, 2016

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

11:00 a.m. (Eastern Standard Time)

Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

Work Group Discussion 

1. Response to SC&A Memorandum on Matrix Issue #5: Problems with personnel dosimetry: 

Gamma Limit of Detection (LOD) for RTG Pu-238 Generators (see DCAS white paper and 

technical call notes)

2. Response to SC&A Memorandum on Matrix Issue #6: Decontamination and Decommissioning

Era of Pinellas (see DCAS white paper)

3. Public questions/comments

March Board Meeting Plans

Adjourn
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding The Meeting:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 

## Sunshine Act Meetings 

# Time and Date:

12 p.m., Wednesday, January 16, 2008. 

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. 

# Status:

 Closed. 

# Matters To Be Considered:

                         The notice previously published on Friday, December 28, 2007 (72 FR 73777) is corrected under the heading “                        *Matters to be Considered*                        ” to read “Enforcement Matters”.                     

      ( print page 1866)    

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084. 

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 08-78 Filed 1-8-08; 12:13 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Resources Public 18-2009 (B) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      16, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.02

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



As Adopted Pursuant to



Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of iGate Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael Zugay, Senior Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 6, 2005



/s/    MICHAEL ZUGAY

Michael Zugay

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Randy Gottfried, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Inktomi Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Inktomi Corporation.

Dated: February 3, 2003                 By: /s/ RANDY GOTTFRIED
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Randy Gottfried