alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Spectrum Brands, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kent J. Hussey, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/    Kent J. Hussey  
|Name:  |  | Kent J. Hussey         
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer



Date:
December 14, 2007



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. This certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Enc.

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D.

 Madison, Wisconsin

Josie Beach

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson

 Rexburg, Idaho

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa

Michael H. Gibson

 Franklin, Ohio

Mark A. Griffon

 Salem, New Hampshire

David Kotelchuck, Ph.D.

 New York, New York

Richard Lemen, Ph.D.

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D.

 Cincinnati, Ohio

Wanda I. Munn

 Richland, Washington

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D.

 College Station, Texas

David B. Richardson, Ph.D.

Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D.

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico

Loretta R. Valerio

 Santa Fe, New Mexico

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

January 31, 2013

The Honorable Kathleen Sebelius

Secretary 

Department of Health and Human Services

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Madam Secretary:

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has 

evaluated Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 00155 concerning 

workers at the Hanford site, under the statutory requirements established 

by the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program 

Act of 2000 and incorporated into 42 C.F.R. § 83.13.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has 

recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for:

“All personnel who were internally monitored (urine or fecal), who 

worked at the Plutonium Finishing Plant in the 200 Area at the 

Hanford Site, from January 1, 1987, to December 31, 1989.”

NIOSH found no evidence that the integrity of the bioassay data being 

used for dose reconstruction for this proposed class was affected by the 

environmental data falsification problem at the laboratory doing the 

bioassay analysis. Consequently, NIOSH has concluded that it has 

access to adequate exposure monitoring and other information necessary 

to do individual dose reconstructions with sufficient accuracy for members 

of the class covered by Petition 00155. Therefore, the class of workers 

covered by Petition 00155 should not be added to the SEC. The Board 

concurs with this determination.

Based on these considerations and the discussion at the December 11 

and 12, 2012, Board meeting held in Knoxville, Tennessee, the Board 

recommends that this class not be added to the SEC.

Enclosed is the documentation from the Board meeting(s) where this SEC 

class was discussed. The documentation includes copies of the petition, 

the NIOSH review thereof, and related materials. If any of these items are 

unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly. 

Sincerely,

[Signature on file]

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH

Chairman, ABRWH

Enclosure
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5667 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to reauthorize the Acer Access 

and Development Program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2018 

Mr. WELCH (for himself and Mr. COURTNEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to reauthorize the 

Acer Access and Development Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Acer Access and Devel5 opment Program Reauthorization Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5667 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACER ACCESS AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM REAU2 THORIZED. 

3 Section 12306(f) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 

4 U.S.C. 1632c(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘2014 through 

5 2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2018 through 2023’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.27


                  DESCRIPTION OF DAVID B. BARTON'S COMPENSATION


      David B. Barton is serving as Senior Vice President of Worldwide Sales of
Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the "Company") pursuant to an offer from the
Company which includes the following principle terms:

o    Starting annual salary: $225,000 paid in semi-monthly installments.

o    Annual incentive compensation: an annual total of up to $250,000, paid
     during the year if certain corporate and individual objectives are met in
     accordance with the Company's executive compensation incentive plan.

o    Stock options: 100,000 options in the Company's common stock, (subject to
     approval of the Company's Board of Directors) to be granted in accordance
     with the Company's options program. These options are ISO qualified and
     non-qualified options (depending on applicable laws and regulations) and
     vest over five years as follows: 20% at the end of the first year and 5%
     each quarter thereafter while Mr. Barton is employed by the Company.

o    Transition pay: $40,000 lump sum payment, to be made with the first payroll
     after Mr. Barton's start date. If Mr. Barton were to voluntarily terminate
     employment with the Company during his first six months of employment, Mr.
     Barton would be required to pay back this transition pay to the Company in
     full on his last day of employment.

o    Severance pay: If during Mr. Barton's first six months of employment, the
     Company terminates employment without cause, the Company agrees to pay six
     months of base salary upon termination. If during Mr. Barton's seventh to
     twelfth months of employment, the Company terminates employment without
     cause, the Company agrees to pay three months of base salary upon
     termination. After one year of employment with the Company, no severance
     plan will be in effect.

      Mr. Barton will participate in the Company's benefits program generally
available to the Company's employees.

      Employment and compensation with the Company are "at will" in that they
can be terminated with or without cause, and with or without notice, at any
time, at the option of either the Company or Mr. Barton. There is no express
and/or implied contract of employment with Mobius.


Dated: June 22,2005
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Joint meeting of SRS and SEC Issues Work Groups 

Teleconference: August 16, 2017 

10:30 a.m. Eastern Time

Conference Phone: 1-866-659-0537; Participant Code: 9933701#

*Please note: The Work Group might not have time to discuss all items on the agenda. 

The technical items are organized roughly in the order they will be discussed. 

Welcome and roll call

1. SC&A Review of SRS Subcontractor Bioassay Data Completeness

2. NIOSH Evaluation of Construction Worker Monitoring in High Level Cave Job 

Plans

3. NIOSH SRS Internal Coworker Dosimetry Data Report and SC&A Review

4. NIOSH Report on Evaluation of SRS Neptunium Operations, SC&A Review and 

Memo, and NIOSH responses; NIOSH Report on Coding to Identify Neptunium 

Workers and SC&A Review. 

5. NIOSH Report on Assessing Exposures to Thorium 232 from 1972-1989.

6. NIOSH Report on Bounding Thoron Intakes at SRS H-Area Tank Farm

7. NIOSH Report on Location of Use of Stable Metal Tritides at SRS

8. Petitioner Comments (optional)

9. WG SEC Recommendations and/or Path Forward on Discussion Items; Plans for 

August Board Meeting. 

Adjourn
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-2134

CHRISTOPHER A. BURKE, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus G. T. WILLIAMS; L. A. CORNER, Court and Legal Services; E.M.G., Court and Legal Services;MS. MORTON, Records Dept., Lunenburg Correctional Center; E. PRESTON GRISSOM, Judge, First Judicial Circuit of Virginia; RANNIE C. BROWN, Secretary of Judge, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-99-863) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 27, 1999Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher A. Burke, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Christopher Burke seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint alleging violations of due process and equal protection. Burke has filed a motion in this court to enjoin the Virginia Department of Corrections and the Circuit Courts of Chesapeake from executing Burke’s plea agreement. We deny his motion and dismiss the appeal.The district court dismissed Burke’s complaint without prejudice because Burke failed to comply with the court’s order to file answers to interrogatories designed to particularize his complaint. Such dismissal without prejudice is not generally appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Furthermore, we lack jurisdiction because Burke’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. The district court’s order was entered on its docket on July 19, 1999. Burke’s notice of appeal was filed on August 19, 1999. Parties are accorded thirty days after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Because Burke3 failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we lack jurisdiction over the appeal.For these reasons, we dismiss Burke’s appeal and deny his motion for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

 Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

 This notice announces the 13th meeting of the American Health Information Community Personalized Healthcare Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

# DATES:

 March 17, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern Time].

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

 The Workgroup will discuss possible common data standards to incorporate interoperable, clinically useful genetic/genomic information and analytical tools into Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to support clinical decision-making for clinician and consumer.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​phc_​instruct.html*.                

Dated: January 30, 2008.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 08-624 Filed 2-12-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-45-M
Exhbit 4.(i)

Exhibit 4(i) Specimen Certificate of Common Stock


Number                                                                    SHARES

              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE


                          NEW GENERATION PLASTIC, INC.

                             TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE
                     50,000,000 SHARES PAR VALUE $.001 EACH
                                  COMMON STOCK
                                                                 See Reverse for
                                                             Certain definitions
                                                                    and transfer
                                                                    restrictions


This is to Certify that ________________________________________ is the owner of
___________________________________________________________ fully paid and
non-assesable shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the books of
the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney
upon surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed.

Witness, the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized
officers.

Dated _______________



/s/ Thomas R. Marshall                      Seal    /s/ Jacques Mot
----------------------------                        ---------------------------
Thomas R. Marshall Secretary                        Jacques Mot        Chairman


<PAGE>


         The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face
of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations:


TEN COM  -as tenants in common                 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- ____
TEN ENT  -as tenants by the entireties         Custodian ________ under Uniform
JT TEN   -as joint tenants with right of       Gifts to Minor Act______________


         Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

For value received _____ hereby sell, assign and transfer and transfer unto
Please insert social security or other
 Identifying number of assignee

________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________Shares
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint ______________________________________________________________ Attorney
to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises.


         Dated ______________________     __________

                                          ______________________________________
_____________________________________
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Meeting of the 

Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) Working Group (WG) 

October 4, 2022 

11:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time)

Videoconference:

Join ZoomGov Meeting

https://cdc.zoomgov.com/j/16067633819?pwd=RUdiYXlZZHFKanpJOHZrcGJIbTlaZz09 

Meeting ID: 160 6763 3819 

Passcode: ABRWH#01

Teleconference:

Phone: (646) 828-7666 

Meeting ID: 160 6763 3819 

Participants ID: #

Meeting Password: 98685439 

Welcome and roll-call

1. DCAS Overview of Rocky Flats Plant (RFP) technical basis documents (TBDs) revised as 

of January 2021:

• Site description (TBD-2): ORAUT-TKBS-0011-2, revision 02, “Rocky Flats Plant – 

Site Description” (NIOSH, 2020a) 

• Occupational medical dose (TBD-3): ORAUT-TKBS-0011-3, revision 03, “Rocky 

Flats Plant – Occupational Medical Dose” (NIOSH, 2019a) 

• Occupational environmental dose (TBD-4): ORAUT-TKBS-0011-4, revision 03, 

“Rocky Flats Plant – Occupational Environmental Dose” (NIOSH, 2020b) 

• Occupational internal dose (TBD-5): ORAUT-TKBS-0011-5, revision 04, “Rocky 

Flats Plant – Occupational Internal Dose” (NIOSH, 2020c) 

• Occupational external dose (TBD-6): ORAUT-TKBS-0011-6, revision 03, “Rocky 

Flats Plant – Occupational External Dose” (NIOSH, 2019b) •

2. SC&A Presentation: SCA-TR-2021-SP001, “Review of 2019–2020 Revisions to Rocky 

Flat

•

s Plant Technical Basis Documents” 

3. WG Discussion and Path Forward

Adjourn
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 19, 2021

Order 

Clerk

July 19, 2021 

163301(3) 

SC: 163301 

Plaintiff, 

v 

WAYNE CIRCUIT COURT, 

Defendant. 

______________________________________/ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is DENIED because MCL 

600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be liable for filing fees. The Clerk 

of the Court is directed to provide two copies of this order and one copy of the application 

filed with the Court to appellant. 

Within 21 days of the date of this order, appellant send to the Court:

1. the initial partial filing fee of $140.00;

2. one copy of this order; and

3. the application that was returned to appellant. 

By doing this, appellant becomes responsible to pay the full $375 filing fee, plus 

the $25 original action fee, for a total of $400. If appellant fails to timely comply with this 

order, the application will be administratively dismissed and the case closed. If appellant 

timely complies with this order, the Department of Corrections shall retain 50% of 

future monthly deposits made to appellant’s account until the $260.00 balance is paid. 

Upon collecting the balance, the department shall remit the amount to this Court. 

Under MCL 600.2963(8), appellant may not file a new civil action or appeal in this 

Court until the filing fee in this case is paid in full. 

In re JERMAINE STEVENSON 

______________________________________

JERMAINE STEVENSON,
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 130 (Monday, July 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 38471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1416]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


July 17, 2008 Board of Directors Meeting

Time and Date: Thursday, July 17, 2008, 10 a.m. (Open Portion). 10:15 
a.m. (Closed Portion).

Place: Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New 
York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: Meeting Open to the Public from 10 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. Closed 
portion will commence at 10:15 a.m. (approx.)

Matters to be Considered: 
1. President's Report.
2. Approval of April 17, 2008 Minutes (Open Portion).

Further Matters to be Considered: (Closed to the Public 10:15 a.m.)

1. Report from Audit Committee.
2. Finance Project--Jordan.
3. Finance Project--Egypt.
4. Finance and Insurance Project-- The Republic of Togo.
5. Finance Project--Russia.
6. Finance Project--Global.
7. Insurance Project--Jordan.
8. Finance Project--Africa.
9. Finance Project--Sub-Saharan Africa.
10. Finance Project--Mexico/Latin America.
11. Finance Project--Asia and the Pacific Islands.
12. Approval of March 21, 2008 Minutes (Closed Portion).
13. Approval of April 17, 2008 Minutes (Closed Portion).
14. Pending Major Projects.
15. Reports.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438.

    Dated: July 2, 2008.
Connie M. Downs,
Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private Investment Corporation.
[FR Doc. 08-1416 Filed 7-2-08; 12:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1159

HENRY HUDSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WESTINGHOUSE SAVANNAH RIVER COMPANY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

SAVANNAH RIVER SITE,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Aiken. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge.

(CA-99-1510-1-22BD)

Submitted: April 17, 2001 Decided: May 2, 2001

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Henry Hudson, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Franklin Thompson, Jr.,

Timothy James O’Rourke, MALONE & THOMPSON, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Henry Hudson appeals the district court’s order that granted

summary judgment to Westinghouse in Hudson’s civil action in which

he alleged mistreatment by his former employer due to his disability and his race. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Hudson v. Westinghouse Savannah

River Co., No. CA-99-1510-1-22BD (D.S.C. Jan. 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED