alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 130 (Monday, July 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 38474]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1415]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of WarpRadio.com, Inc., Wireless Frontier Internet, 
Inc., and World Associates, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

July 2, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
WarpRadio.com, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since 
the period ended September 30, 2000.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Wireless Frontier Internet, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since September 30, 2004.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
World Associates, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports 
since the period ended September 30, 2004.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on July 2, 
2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on July 16, 2008.

    By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 08-1415 Filed 7-2-08; 11:14 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form F-3 (Nos. 333-109876, 333-111512 and  333-119750 ),on Form S-3 (No. 333-128377) and on Form S-8 (No. 333-133258) ofWorld Heart Corporation of our report dated March 3, 2006 relating to thefinancial statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A.

 

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Ottawa, Canada 

April 26, 2006

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
  SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reach Messaging Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shane Gau, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
  Date: August 19, 2011
By:
/s/ Shane GauShane GauChief Executive Officer
  A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    A notice is hereby given that, on December 21, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Santa Barbara Infrared, Santa Barbara, CA has withdrawn as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of ther group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all ahcanges in membership.

                    On May 29, 2001,  Interchangeable Virtual Instruments Foundation, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 30, 2001 (66 FR 39336).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 10, 2007. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 7, 2007 (72 FR 6265).                

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 08-561 Filed 2-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARIE SCHWARTZ,

Appellant,

v.

GARY SCHWARTZ,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2795

[November 17, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Laura C. Burkhart, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

50202020DR003224XXXXSB.

Michael D. Cirullo, Jr., of Goren, Cherof, Doody & Ezrol, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Jaclyn R. Soroka and B. Niklas Brihammar of Rudolph & Associates, 

LLC, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Summary – OCAS-TIB-006, Rev. 1 1 SC&A – January 20, 2011

Overview of

INTERPRETATION OF EXTERNAL DOSIMETRY RECORDS

AT THE SAVANNAH RIVER SITE (SRS)

(OCAS-TIB-006, Rev. 1) 

Workers have the potential to receive a radiation dose to their bodies from external sources of 

radiation due to the nature of work at many Department of Energy and Atomic Weapons 

Employer facilities. Technical Information Bulletin (TIB) Interpretation of External Dosimetry 

Records at the Savannah River Site (OCAS-TIB-006), provides guidance on how to assign 

external doses to workers at the Savannah River Site (SRS), who have no or limited radiation 

monitoring data; assignment is based on site coworker data. 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS RESULTING FROM THE TECHNICAL REVIEW

The technical contractor for the Advisory Board of Radiation and Worker Health (the Board) 

reviewed the TIB and produced the three findings summarized below: 

Finding #1: Guidance regarding the need to apply corrections to data from a certain type of 

dosimeter used to measure radiation exposure to personnel at SRS between 1954 and 1981 is 

complex, confusing, and does not clearly indicate which dosimetry data require modification. 

Finding #2: It is unclear whether guidance supplied by the TIB replaces instruction contained in 

the SRS Site Profile, also referred to as the SRS Technical Basis Document. 

Finding #3: Guidance is not clear on which timeframes require interpretation of shallow dose 

data. 

RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS

In response to the findings identified above, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and 

Health (NIOSH) initially proposed to review the TIB and the related guidance in the SRS Site 

Profile to clarify guidance about what information should appear in which document. After 

further discussion, NIOSH decided to revise the TIB to address the findings; Revision 2 was 

issued on October 4, 2007. 

All issues were resolved to the satisfaction of the Board.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

171 

CAF 14-00159 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY DEPARTMENT 

OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ON BEHALF OF 

JODIE L. SUBER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

WALTER J. MORSE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 16.) 

JULIE B. HEWITT, MAYVILLE, FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County

(Judith S. Claire, J.), entered October 17, 2013 in a proceeding

pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order dismissed the

objection of the Chautauqua County Department of Health and Human

Services and affirmed the order of the Support Magistrate. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs (see Matter of Chautauqua County

Dept. of Health & Human Servs. v Matteson, ___ AD3d ___ [Mar. 20,

2015]).

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 23 / Monday, February 4, 2008 / Presidential Documents 6569 

Presidential Determination No. 2008–10 of January 29, 2008 

Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs Related to 

Africa and the Middle East 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the 

United States, including sections 2 and 4(a)(1) of the Migration and Refugee 

Assistance Act of 1962 (the ‘‘Act’’), as amended (22 U.S.C. 2601 and 2603), 

and section 301 of title 3, United States Code: 

(1) I hereby determine, pursuant to 2(c)(1) of the Act, that it is important 

to the national interest to furnish assistance under the Act in an amount 

not to exceed $32 million from the United States Emergency Refugee and 

Migration Assistance Fund for the purpose of meeting unexpected and urgent 

refugee and migration needs, including by contributions to international, 

governmental, and nongovernmental organizations and payment of administrative expenses of the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of 

the Department of State, related to humanitarian needs in Africa and in 

the West Bank and Gaza; and 

(2) the functions of the President in relation to this memorandum under 

2(d) of the Act, and of establishing terms and conditions under section 

2(c)(1) of the Act, are assigned to you. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, January 29, 2008. 

[FR Doc. 08–495 

Filed 2–1–08; 8:58 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


ebenthall on PRODPC61 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Linde Work Group Report

ABRWH June 2012 Meeting

Gen Roessler, Chair

Josie Beach

Jim Lockey

Mike Gibson
Background

• SECs granted:

October 1, 1942 – October 31, 1947

November 1, 1947 – December 31, 1953

January 1, 1954 – December 31, 1969

Requirements:

– At least one of the 22 “specified cancers”

– Worked for at least 250 days at the site.

• Dose Reconstruction:

January 1, 1970 - July 31, 2006
Work Group Activities

• TBD Review Began in March 2007

• Completed SEC Petition Evaluations

• TBD Issues

– All resolved except for two issues related to utility 

tunnels and how dose reconstruction is done for 

workers who do not qualify for compensation under 

SECs

1. When were certain sections of the tunnels built, 

and

2. How much time was spent in tunnels.
Recent Meetings

NIOSH, work group, and SC&A had agreement, but 

worker statements needed clarification and we 

needed input on tunnel occupancy.

• Information Meeting

Buffalo: 30 April 2012

• Teleconference Call

 30 May 2012
Buffalo Meeting

• Present

– 5 Linde workers

– 3 WG members

– Jim Neton, NIOSH

– Steve Ostrow, SC&A

– 2 ATL members, one took notes

– Ted Katz
Agenda

• Background and needs of work group

• Viewing of Linde “maps”

– 1957 pre-construction diagrams

– 1961 pre-construction diagrams

• Discussions

– One on one

– Group

• Wrap Up

• Plan Forward
Teleconference Call Summary

1. When tunnels were built:

NIOSH will use dose information for these areas 

during these time periods.
Teleconference Call Summary

2. Time spent in tunnels:

– All “crafts” workers: 50%

– All other workers: 5%

• Conclusion

Workgroup and SC&A agree that all TBD 

issues are resolved.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5912 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5912

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to delay the reduction in 
   Federal medical assistance percentage for Medicaid personal care 
services and home health services furnished without an electronic visit 
              verification system, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2018

 Mr. Langevin (for himself, Ms. DeGette, Mr. Young of Alaska, and Mr. 
   Stivers) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to delay the reduction in 
   Federal medical assistance percentage for Medicaid personal care 
services and home health services furnished without an electronic visit 
              verification system, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELAY IN REDUCTION OF FMAP FOR MEDICAID PERSONAL CARE 
              SERVICES AND HOME HEALTH SERVICES FURNISHED WITHOUT AN 
              ELECTRONIC VISIT VERIFICATION SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1903(l) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1396b(l)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``January 1, 2019'' and inserting 
                ``January 1, 2020''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (A)(i), by striking ``2019 
                and''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(A)(i), by striking ``calendar quarters 
        in 2019'' and inserting ``calendar quarters in 2020''.
    (b) Revised Regulations.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human Services 
shall issue, using formal rulemaking procedures including notice and an 
opportunity for an agency hearing on the record in accordance with 
section 556 of title 5, United States Code, revised regulations 
relating to the requirement under section 1903(l) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(l)) that States establish electronic 
visit verification systems for personal care services or home health 
services requiring an in-home visit by a provider that are provided 
under a State Medicaid plan.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-30324 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. KENYOUN GILYARD, also known as PopDefendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:06-CR-50110-1
Before KING, DAVIS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Kenyoun Gilyard appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of c ocaine base. He argues that the district court clearly erred by applying a two-level enhancement for his possessing a firearm during a drug crime under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1). We review the district court’s firearm adjustment under United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-30324

2 § 2D1.1(b)(1) for clear error. United States v. Eastland, 989 F.2d 760, 770 (5th Cir. 1993). While there was no evidence that Gilyard carried a firearm when he sold drugs, the evidence showed that Gilyard carried firearms and used them in confrontations and gun battles relating to the drug conspiracy. Accordingly, the district court’s application of the enhancement was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Wilson, 116 F.3d 1066, 1094 (5th Cir. 1997), vacated in part on other grounds, 161 F.3d 256, 256 n.1 (5th Cir. 1998) (en banc). Gilyard argues that the district court clearly erred by applying the fourl evel enhancement for his being an organizer or leader of a criminal activity involving four or more partici pants pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a). He assumes without admitting that the Government proved that he was a leader or organizer of a criminal activity involving himself and his three co-defendants. He maintains that the Government did not prove the existence ofa fifth participant in the criminal activity by a preponderance of the evidence. The evidence before the district court showed that Ronald K ing and Shelby King, as well as Gilyard and his three co-defendants, were participants in the criminal activity. While there was no evidence that Gilyard organized or led Ronald or Shelby King, this is immaterial as the enhancement was proper if there were five or more participants in the cri minal activity, and Gilyard organized or led at least one other participant. See United States v. Okoli , 20 F.3d 615, 616 (5th Cir. 1994). The district court’s application of the enhancement was not clearly erroneous. See id. G ilyard argues that the district courtviolated hisSixth Amendment rights by enhancing his advisory guidelines sentence range and sentence based upon facts not admitted by him or found by a jury. As he concedes, this argument is foreclosed. See United Statesv. Mares, 402 F.3d 511, 519 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 31.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification

I,
Wendy A. Nieto, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Technology and Operations of Intraware, Inc. certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Intraware, Inc. (the "registrant");

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):



Dated:
May 4, 2004

|/s/WENDY A. NIETOWendy A. Nieto                                                                                 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Technology and Operations
(Principal Financial Officer)

---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5636 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5636

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
   To designate additions to the Flatside Wilderness on the Ouachita 
                National Forest, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Flatside Wilderness Enhancement 
Act''.
SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO FLATSIDE WILDERNESS.
    Section 3(d) of Arkansas Wilderness Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-508; 
98 Stat. 2349) is amended by inserting ``and certain land in the 
Ouachita National Forest, which comprise approximately 640 acres, as 
generally depicted as `Recommended Wilderness Area' on the map titled 
`Flatside Wilderness, Recommended Wilderness Area', dated September 6, 
2018'' after ``1984''.
SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS ADDITION.
    The wilderness addition created under section 2 shall be known as 
the Bethune Woods-Flatside Wilderness. Any reference in a law, map, 
regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to 
such portion of the Flatside Wilderness shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the Bethune Woods-Flatside Wilderness.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```