alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SC&A Tasking:

Review of 

Savannah River Site (SRS) 

Subcontractor Records 

Joseph Fitzgerald, SC&A

Status Briefing to the 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Santa Fe, New Mexico

November 30, 2016
Issue

• SRS subcontractor records not yet validated and verified (V&V) for 

adequacy and completeness.

• In 2014, learned that subcontractor records kept separately in 

“company files” and migrated to electronic databases in mid/late 

1980s.

• NIOSH has not been able to V&V these records via NOCTS and DOL 

databases.

• SC&A’s concerns are two-fold:

• How complete are company files, particularly beyond the 1980s, when more work 

was outsourced? 

• To what extent was external dose information for subcontractors migrated to SRS 

databases being used by NIOSH, and can complete bioassay results be found for 

subcontractor where indicated?
NIOSH Current Approach

• Some 3,000 pages of construction job plans found for 773A for 1981–

1985.

• As briefed in July, NIOSH intends to identify subcontractors from 

these job plans, select a suitable sample, and ascertain whether 

matching bioassay records exist.

• Advisory Board members expressed concern over scope of sampling 

review and whether this level of V&V would suffice, given the broad 

scope of operations and time periods at SRS.
SC&A Tasking

• SC&A tasked with expanding scope of V&V sampling to encompass 

additional time periods and facilities/operations at SRS.

• Preliminary plan provided to SRS work group and NIOSH, with 

conference call held September 26, 2016, to discuss approach and 

coordinate path forward.

• Plan calls for:

• Using SRS online secure document search system (EDWS) to identify safe 

work permits, construction job plans, and any rosters including 

subcontractors for 1972–2007, with expanded focus on D&D, tank farms, 

canyons, etc.

• Submit data capture request based on search results to SRS for box pulls; 

schedule onsite visit.

• Screen boxes and select relevant records containing subcontractor ID 

information.

• Match subcontractor personnel with both electronic databases (HPRED 

and HPAREH for external dose) and bioassay cards (on microfiche).
Remaining Question

Agreement on plan reached with one outstanding question:

What is an appropriate measure of adequacy for V&V “matching” –

e.g., for what percentage of subcontractor workers should 

corresponding external dose and bioassay records be found?
Status

• Access to EDWS online document search system renewed and access 

granted to SC&A by SRS.

• EDWS search commenced and to be completed by Board meeting in 

Santa Fe; results to be coordinated with work group and NIOSH.

• Next steps – Submit data capture request to SRS for box pull based on 

records identified and coordinate onsite review date.

• Likely visit windows are first half of December 2016 and January 2017.

• Two-step process: (1) pull subcontractor identifiers for specified time 

periods and facility/operations, and (2) match identifiers with 

corresponding SRS dose records.

• Onsite review to be done in conjunction with NIOSH and work group.
# Continuation of the National Emergency Relating to Cuba and of the Emergency Authority Relating to the Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels

                        On March 1, 1996, by Proclamation 6867, a national emergency was declared to address the disturbance or threatened disturbance of international relations caused by the February 24, 1996, destruction by the Cuban government of two unarmed U.S.-registered civilian aircraft in international airspace north of Cuba. In July 1996 and on subsequent occasions, the Cuban government stated its intent to forcefully defend its sovereignty against any U.S.- registered vessels or aircraft that might enter Cuban territorial waters or airspace while involved in a flotilla or peaceful protest. Since these events, the Cuban government has not demonstrated that it will refrain from the future use of reckless and excessive force against U.S. vessels or aircraft that may engage in memorial activities or peaceful protest north of Cuba. On February 26, 2004, by Proclamation 7757, the scope of the national emergency was expanded in order to deny monetary and material support to the repressive Cuban government, which had taken a series of steps to destabilize relations with the United States, including threatening to abrogate the Migration Accords with the United States and to close the United States Interests Section. Further, Cuba's most senior officials repeatedly asserted that the United States intended to invade Cuba, despite explicit denials from the U.S. Secretaries of State and Defense that such action is planned. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect to Cuba and the emergency authority relating to the regulation of the anchorage and movement of vessels set out in Proclamation 6867 as amended and expanded by Proclamation 7757.                               ( print page 7460)    

                        This notice shall be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 08-595

Billing code 3195-01-P
Dear Madam Secretary:

Enclosed for your information is a report prepared by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health (the Board). The Board conducts independent reviews of selected radiation dose reconstructions 

completed by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in accordance with the 

requirements of the Energy Employees Occupational illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. The 

purpose of the Board’s review process as mandated by the Act is to advise you on the “scientific validity 

and quality of dose estimation and reconstruction efforts being performed for purposes of the 

compensation program.”

This report was initially prepared by the Board’s Subcommittee for Dose Reconstruction Reviews with 

input from the full Board and approved by the Board on........ This report covers the Board’s review of 

232 dose reconstructions conducted since the last report to the Secretary in 2009. The reviews 

represent over one percent of the dose reconstructions performed by NIOSH during this time period. 

These reviews are generally representative of the overall population and work locations covered by the 

program but were prioritized to focus on dose reconstructions that involved more comprehensive dose 

reconstruction procedures and on results that were close to the level where errors in dose 

reconstruction could have a greater impact on compensation decisions. 

The Board’s review of the 232 individual dose reconstructions found only 626 findings and of these 

findings only 22 (4%) were judged to have the potential for a significant impact on the dose 

reconstruction. Given the greater complexity of the cases reviewed compared to the first set, the Board 

believes that the NIOSH dose reconstruction process has improved since our last report. Many of the 

findings result from the limited availability of relevant technical and work information from facilities that 

were first in operation over 50 years ago. Our review of these dose reconstructions and our ongoing 

review of dose reconstruction procedures provides the Board with a high level of confidence that the 

dose reconstruction process is scientifically sound. Finally, the Board has made several 

recommendations to modify and improve our review process.

We hope that you will find this information useful and informative.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

No. 83851 

FILED 

FEB 2 3 2022 

IZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK Oz

E SUPREME: COURT 

BY _D v' 

DEPUIlcctiYR; - 61-4)1" 

ENERGY ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY 

COMPANY, A UTAH CORPORATION, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

ENVIRONMENTAL APPLIED 

TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, F/K/A 

ENERGY ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY 

COMPANY, F/K/A ENERGY ALLIANCE 

TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, A NEVADA 

CORPORATION, 

Res • ondent. 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

Cause appearing, appellant's motion for a voluntary dismissal 

of this appeal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. NRAP 42(b). 

It is so ORDERED. 

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

ELIZABEB A. BiROWN 

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge 

Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlement Judge 

Maningo Law 

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas 

Snell & Wilmer LLP/Costa Mesa 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5829 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5829

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to inform each physician of 
 the Veterans Health Administration of the opioid prescribing rate of 
     the physician and to require pain management training for the 
         physicians with the highest opioid prescribing rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2018

  Mr. Mullin introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to inform each physician of 
 the Veterans Health Administration of the opioid prescribing rate of 
     the physician and to require pain management training for the 
         physicians with the highest opioid prescribing rates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Opioid Prescribing Rates 
Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORTS ON VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION PHYSICIAN 
              OPIOID PRESCRIBING RATES AND MANDATORY PAIN MANAGEMENT 
              TRAINING FOR HIGHEST PRESCRIBERS.

    (a) Annual Reports.--Not less frequently than once each year, the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall transmit to each individual 
employed by the Veterans Health Administration as a physician a report 
on the opioid prescribing rates of the individual.
    (b) Pain Management Training.--Each fiscal year, the Secretary 
shall ensure that each of the individuals employed by the Veterans 
Health Administration as physicians who were among the 10 percent of 
individuals employed by the Administration as physicians who had the 
highest opioid prescribing rates in the most recently completed fiscal 
year receive pain management training.
                                 <all>
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 19, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 134770(46) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. FRED BURGESS, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 134770 COA: 268569 Otsego CC: 04-010786-CK DONALD BERN HARDT and MICHAEL BERNHARDT, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s November 29, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it doe s not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

p0211 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 19, 2008

Clerk
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Blue Ribbon Panel on VA-Medical School Affiliations has scheduled a meeting for March 27, 2007, in Room 542 at 1800 G Street NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. and will end at 3 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Panel is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, through the Under Secretary for Health, in issues related to a comprehensive philosophical framework to enhance VA's partnerships with medical schools and affiliated institutions.

The panelists will review VA's current affiliations with medical schools and establish the future directions of the Panel. The Panel will receive background presentations and issue papers on various topics that are relevant to the Panel's deliberations.

                    Interested persons may attend and present oral statements to the Panel. Oral presentations will be limited to five minutes or less, depending on the number of participants. Interested parties may also provide written comments for review by the Panel prior to the meeting or at any time, by e-mail to                     *Gloria.Holland@va.gov*                     or by mail to Gloria J. Holland, PhD Special Assistant for Policy and Planning to the Chief Academic Affiliations Officer, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., (14), Washington, DC 20420.                

Dated: February 15, 2007.

By Direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-785 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1


I, Raymond J. Skiptunis, Chief Executive Officer of Power Efficiency
Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

   1. the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m
      or 78o(d)); and

   2. the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date:  March 25, 2003

      BY:  /s/ Raymond J. Skiptunis
           -------------------------
           Raymond. J. Skiptunis
           Chief Executive Officer

I, Raymond J. Skiptunis, Chief Financial Officer of Power Efficiency
Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

   3. the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
      December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m
      or 78o(d)); and

   4. the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Date:  March 25, 2003

      BY: /s/ Raymond J. Skiptunis
          -------------------------
          Raymond. J. Skiptunis
          Chief Financial Officer
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00410

- CV

IN RE GO INTERESTS, LLC ; GREGORY OBERT ; GWENDOLYN M. OBERT ; GO HELICOPTERS, INC.; HELITRANS COMP ANY; HILLTOP COMMERCIAL HOLDINGS, INC. ; AND GO COLORADO 2007 REVOCA BLE TRUST R ELATOR S

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------
The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of

man damus is denied.

Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let

execution issue.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4

, 52.8 (d).2 PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, DAUPHINOT, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: November 16, 201 0
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5792 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 90 North 4th Avenue in Brighton, Colorado, 

as the ‘‘Detective Heath McDonald Gumm Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5792 EH

1 SECTION 1. DETECTIVE HEATH MCDONALD GUMM POST 

2 OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 90 North 4th Avenue in Brigh5 ton, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘De6 tective Heath McDonald Gumm Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Detective Heath 

11 McDonald Gumm Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5792 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostMcDonald Gumm Post Office’’. Brighton, Colorado, as the ‘‘Detective Heath al Service located at 90 North 4th Avenue in
Enc.

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH. 

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D.

 Madison, Wisconsin

Josie Beach

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson

 Rexburg, Idaho

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa

Michael H. Gibson

 Franklin, Ohio

Mark A. Griffon

 Salem, New Hampshire

Richard Lemen, Ph.D.

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D.

 Cincinnati, Ohio

Wanda I. Munn

 Richland, Washington

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D.

 College Station, Texas

Robert W. Presley

 Seymour, Tennessee

David B. Richardson, Ph.D.

 Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D.

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

February 26, 2010

The Honorable Richard Durbin

309 Hart Senate Office Building

Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Durbin:

This is in response to your letter of December 3, 2009, to the Advisory Board on 

Radiation and Worker Health (the Board) regarding the former employees at 

General Steel Industries in Granite City, Illinois. 

The Board is currently reviewing the National Institute for Occupational Safety 

and Health (NIOSH) Evaluation Report for General Steel Industries (GSI) in 

response to the petition received under the Energy Employees Occupational 

Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA) to add a class of GSI 

employees to the Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) for the years covering 1951 

to 1973. The Board’s contractor, Sanford Cohen and Associates (SC&A), and 

the GSI Work Group are also reviewing additional new information about the 

site. Although we are not sure when our review will be complete, we expect 

that it will be ready for discussion at one of our upcoming Board meetings.

Thank you for your continued interest in the EEOICPA and the activities of this 

Board.

 Sincerely, 

 

 [Signature on file]

 

 James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. Ph.

 Chairman, ABRWH
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Richard E. Gathright, certify that:

   1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Streicher Mobile
Fueling, Inc.;

   2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

   4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end the
      period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

   5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: September 28, 2004


/s/ RICHARD E. GATHRIGHT
---------------------------------------
Richard E. Gathright
President and Chief Executive Officer
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5461 

To require records of the national instant criminal background check system 

to be retained for at least 90 days. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2018 

Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York (for herself, Mr. SUOZZI, Ms. 

MENG, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. ESPAILLAT, and Mr. ENGEL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require records of the national instant criminal background check system to be retained for at least 90 days. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘NICS Review Act of 

5 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT NICS RECORDS BE RETAINED 

7 FOR AT LEAST 90 DAYS. 

8 Section 511 of division B of the Consolidated and 

9 Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2012 (34 U.S.C. 

10 40901 note; Public Law 112–55; 125 Stat. 632) is amendVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:43 Apr 11, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5461.IH H5461

dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5461 IH

1 ed by striking ‘‘no more than 24 hours’’ and inserting ‘‘no 

2 fewer than 90 days’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS