alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A96A0749, A96A0750.

#### BROWN et al. v. JACKSON et al.; and vice versa.

(470 SE2d 786)

Johnson, Judge.

Representatives of the estate of Etheridge Brown filed this *201wrongful death suit against Deputy Sheriffs Cordel Jackson and Richard Vi rung and Peach County. The three defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted the motion with regard to the claims against Jackson and Vining, finding that the officers are entitled to official immunity for the allegedly negligent performance of their discretionary duties as law enforcement officers. The motion was denied as to Peach County.

*Case No. A96A0749*

1. Appellants’ appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the two deputy sheriffs was docketed on December 15,1995. Appellants’ brief and enumerations of error were due on January 4, 1996. Appellants did not request an extension of time to file enumerations of error and brief before the expiration of the time permitted for filing. See Court of Appeals Rules 13 and 26. No brief or enumerations of error have been filed as of this date. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed as abandoned.

*Case No. A96A0750*

*2.*Peach County asserts in this appeal that the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment because deputy sheriffs are employees of the sheriff rather than the county, and therefore the county cannot be liable for their actions as their principal. We agree. In *Gilbert v. Richardson*264 Ga. 744 (452 SE2d 476) (1994), the Georgia Supreme Court held that “[s]ince deputy sheriffs are employed by the sheriff rather than the county, sheriffs may be liable in their official capacity for a deputy’s negligence in performing an official function.” Id. at 754 (7). This Court has addressed the issue as well. “Deputy sheriffs and deputy jailors are employees of the sheriff, whom the sheriffs alone are entitled to appoint or discharge. [Cit.j They have no duties save alone duties of the sheriff, which as his deputy and his agent they are by law authorized to perform. The sheriff, and not the county, is liable for the misconduct of his deputies.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) *Wayne County v. Herrin,*210 Ga. App. 747, 751 (3) (437 SE2d 793) (1993). Deputy Sheriffs Jackson and Vining, at all times relevant to this case, were employees of the sheriff and not Peach County. Therefore, the Peach County Sheriff, and not Peach County, would have been the proper party to have sued under a theory of respondeat superior. The trial court’s denial of Peach County’s motion for summary judgment was error and must be reversed.

3. Because of our holding in Division 2 above, we need not address Peach County’s additional allegations of error.

*Appeal dismissed in Case No. A96A0749; judgment reversed in*
      *202
      *Case No. A96A0750.*

Decided April 29, 1996.

*Gordon L. Joyner,*for appellants.

*Chambless, Higdon & Carson, Thomas F. Richardson, Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers, Christopher D. Balch,*for appellees.

*McMurray, P. J., and Ruffin, J., concur.*
# C_2010187EN.01000401.xml

| 10.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 July 2010

2010/C 187/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2637 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4553 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83600 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4767 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3331 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0420 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,360 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 280,24 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7088 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0699 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2373 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9628 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4452 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3072 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8283 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7854 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7449 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 513,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5681 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5597 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2056 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 429,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0382 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,359 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,0275 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,868 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2266 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1465 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 58,9710 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2637

JPY

Japanese yen

111,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4553

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83600

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4767

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3331

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0420

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,360

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

280,24

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7088

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0699

RON

Romanian leu

4,2373

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9628

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4452

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3072

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8283

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7854

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7449

KRW

South Korean won

1 513,12

ZAR

South African rand

9,5681

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5597

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2056

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 429,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0382

PHP

Philippine peso

58,359

RUB

Russian rouble

39,0275

THB

Thai baht

40,868

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2266

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1465

INR

Indian rupee

58,9710

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Credex Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: February 18, 2011

By: /s/ Denise Leonardo
    _____________________

    Denise Leonardo
    President (CEO)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Credex Corporation and
will be retained by Credex Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Partnership. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/Walter      Davis                                                               |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Walter      Davis                                                                  |   |
|   | Title: | President      of                                                                  |   |
|   |   | Demeter      Management LLC,                                                       |   |
|   |   | general      partner of the registrant                                             |   |
|   | Date:  | November      16, 2009           |   |
|   |   |                                                                               |   |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0427

RISE MAY COOLEY,

 Co-Petitioner AND Appellee, 

 vs.

HARVEY LYNN COOLEY

 Co-Petitioner and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Anita Roessmann, whose name appears next on the list

of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is 

maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this September 17, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Rise May Cooley, Brad Lee Belke, Anita Roessmann

09/17/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0427
| 1. | Voltage Vehicles, a Nevada company, wholly owned. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | ZAP Rental Outlet, a Nevada company, wholly owned. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | ZAP Stores, Inc., a California company, wholly owned. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | ZAP Manufacturing, Inc., a Nevada company, wholly owned. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | ZAP World Outlet, Inc., a California company, wholly owned. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------|

| 6. | RAP Group, Inc. a California company, wholly owned. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------|

| 7. | Portable Energy LLC, a California limited liability company, wholly owned. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 8. | Zhejiang Jonway Automobile Co., Ltd., ZAP owns 51% of its equity shares. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 9. | Portable Energy LLC, a Nevada Company, wholly owned. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------|
I 

★

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5494 

To amend the Small Business Act to include contracts awarded under section 

8127 of title 38, United States Code, in the limitations relating to 

subcontracting, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2018 

Mr. KELLY of Mississippi (for himself, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. BERGMAN, and 

Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Small Business 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to include contracts 

awarded under section 8127 of title 38, United States 

Code, in the limitations relating to subcontracting, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Business 

5 Opportunities for Veterans Adjustment Act of 2018’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5494 IH1S 

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO SUBCONTRACTING LIMITATIONS 

2 IN THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT. 

3 Section 46 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

4 657s) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘or under 

6 section 8127 of title 38, United States Code,’’ after 

7 ‘‘36,’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection (e)(1)— 

9 (A) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

10 at the end; 

11 (B) in subparagraph (E), by striking the 

12 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

13 (C) by adding at the end the following new 

14 subparagraph: 

15 ‘‘(F) with respect to a contract awarded 

16 under section 8127 of title 38, United States 

17 Code, is a small business concern owned and 

18 controlled by veterans (as defined in such sec19 tion).’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5338 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5338

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to repeal authority to make 
             bonus payments to States based on performance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2018

 Mrs. Handel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to repeal authority to make 
             bonus payments to States based on performance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Needless Award Payments Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT.

    Section 16 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2025) is 
amended by striking subsection (d).

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect on the first day 
of the first fiscal year that begins after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Ori Goore, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Dynamic
Applications Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30 , 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.




Date:  November
      5, 2009By:
              /s/
      Ori GooreName:
              Ori
      GooreTitle:
              Chief
      Executive Officer andDirector
      (Principal Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Overview of

CONDUCT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS

(ORAUT-PROC-0080)

The Oak Ridge Associated Universities Team (ORAUT), a contractor to the National Institute

for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), has a quality assurance (QA) system to oversee

and maintain the overall quality of its work products and processes called the Quality 

Management System (QMS). The procedure being reviewed, Conduct of Quality Assurance 

Audits, (ORAUT-PROC-0080), provides ORAUT personnel with guidance and instruction to 

administer and conduct independent quality audits and assessments of its work. Included in the is 

procedure is guidance on planning, scheduling, and conduct of audits; development, review, and 

approval of QA Audit Reports; and the maintenance of audit records. It also describes the 

responsibilities and interactions of various ORAUT personnel as they implement the different 

steps of the procedure. 

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS RESULTING FROM THE TECHNICAL REVIEW

SC&A’s review of the procedure produced two findings, both of which were in the form of 

suggestions on how the procedure could be improved in future revisions: 

Finding #1: SC&A felt that this procedure inadequately describes how it fits into the overall 

ORAUT quality assurance program, with its several, inter-related procedures. Because of this, the 

reader sees only the one piece of the QA program discussed in the procedure and may not see how 

it relates to the other pieces. 

Finding #2: SC&A felt that since the steps in the procedure were frequently difficult to follow, 

the reader would benefit from inclusion of a flowchart showing the work flow and decision 

points. 

RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS

NIOSH responded to the first finding by stating that this procedure is one of a number of 

“implementing procedures” under the project’s Quality Management System, and by 

outlining the overall system and describing how the subject procedure fits into it. The response 

also noted that the overall Quality Management System and its several procedures are described in 

other documents, which are available for review. Finally, NIOSH concluded by stating that it 

would consider whether SC&A’s comments would be included in future revisions of the 

procedure. 

NIOSH responded to the second finding by acknowledging that inclusion of a flowchart would 

make it easier to understand the procedure and that it would consider including one in a future 

revision. 

Both issues were resolved to the satisfaction of the Advisory Board. 

Summary – ORAUT-PROC-0080, Rev. 00 2 SC&A – September 13, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Guangwen He, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HQ Global Education Inc. for the quarter ended November 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HQ Global Education Inc.





Dated: January 17, 2012/s/ Guangwen HeChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to HQ Global Education Inc. and will be retained by HQ Global Education Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 
 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Car Charging Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Farkas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Car Charging Group, Inc.
 
 By: /s/ Michael D. Farkas
 Michael D. Farkas
 Chief Executive Officer
 Principal Executive Officer
 
 June 13, 2011
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, III 

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 4:11cv311-SPM/WCS

H. LONG, et al., 

Defendants. 

_________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an order filed August

June 28, 2011, Plaintiff was directed to either (1) file a motion for leave to file in forma

pauperis, or (2) pay the $350.00 filing fee, or (3) file a notice of voluntary dismissal of

this action by July 29, 2011. Plaintiff was specifically warned that a recommendation

would be made that this case be dismissed if he failed to comply with that order. Doc.

3. To date, no response has been received from the Plaintiff. 

Case 4:11-cv-00311-SPM-WCS Document 4 Filed 08/24/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, his complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

The Plaintiff shall have a 15 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for his failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice and Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be

DENIED as moot.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on August 24, 2011. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:11cv311-SPM/WCS

Case 4:11-cv-00311-SPM-WCS Document 4 Filed 08/24/11 Page 2 of 2
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed

August 13 , 2019.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00597- CV

IN RE MENAT SALEM, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 311th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017-67310



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On July 31, 2019, relator Menat Salem filed a petition for writ of mandamus
in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Germaine J. Tanner, presiding judge of the 311th District Court of Harris County
, to set aside her May 24, 2019 interim order granting attorney’s fees to the rea l party in interest in the underlying case for annulment or divorce.2

Relator has not established that she is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny relator’s emergency motion to stay.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Hassan.