T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

Th e H o n o r ab l e Ti mo th y M . Bu r g e s s , D i s tr i c tJ u d g e f o rth e U . S. ** D i s tr i c tC our tf

orthe D i s tr i c tof

A l a s ka , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T SE AN BARNET T, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. S A L M A R T I N E Z , # 7 8 2 , e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 11- 16797 D . C. N o . 4 : 0 9 - c v - 0 5 6 0 5 - CW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o r th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C l a udi a W i l ke n, C hi e f

D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry 15, 2013 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: F A R R IS and N . R . S M IT H , C i rc ui tJudg es , and B U R G E S S , D i stri ct Judg e. ** Se a n Ba rn e ttap p e a l s th e d i s tr i c tc o u r t ’ s s u mma ry j u d g me n ti n h i s 4 2 U . S. C. § 1983 a c t i on. B a rne tta l l e ge s tha tof f i c e r s G e bb, A nde r s on, a nd M a r t i ne z of the 

# FI LED MA Y07 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

C a l i f orni a D e pa r tm e ntof

A l c ohol i c B e ve r a ge C ontr ol a rr e s t e d hi m w i thout p r o b ab le c a u s e d u r in g th e c o u r s e o f a n in v e s tig a tio n f

o rlic e n s in g v io la tio n s a t h is p la c e o f b u s in e s s . B a rn e tt w a s a rr e s te d f o rp o s s e s s in g a c o n c e a le d f ir e a rm in vi ol at i on of C al i forni a P enal C od e s ec t i on 25 40 0(a) (2), bu tthe di stri ctatt orney d e c lin e d to c h a r g e h im . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u a n t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e a f f irm . W e r e v ie w th e d is tr ic t c o u r t’s g r a n t o f s u m m a ry ju d g m e n t d e n o v o . Szaj er v . Ci t y o f L. A. , 632 F . 3d 607, 610 ( 9th C i r . 2011) . “ [ R ] e vi e w i s gove rne d by the s a m e s ta n d a r d u s e d b y th e tr ia l c o u r t u n d e rF e d e r a l R u le o f C iv il P r o c e d u r e 5 6 ( c ) .” A dc oc k v . Chr ys l e rC or p. , 1 6 6 F . 3 d 1 2 9 0 , 1 2 9 2 (9 th C i r. 1 9 9 9 ). “ T h i s C o u rtm u st de t e r m i ne , vi e w i ng the e vi de nc e i n the l i ghtm os tf a vor abl e t o the nonm ovi ng party, w hether there ar e a ny genu i ne i ss ues of m at er i al fa ctand w hether the di stri ct courtcorr ec t l y app l i ed the re l evantsubst ant i ve l aw . ” Szaj er , 632 F . 3d a t610 ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n a n d c ita tio n o m itte d ) . “W h e n th e u n d e r ly in g f a c ts a r e n o t in d is p u te , th e c o u r t's o n ly f u n c tio n is to d e te rm in e w h e th e rth e d is tr ic t c o u r t c o rr e c tly appl i ed the l aw . ” I

d. T he un di sput ed fa ct s kno w n b y the offi ce rs pri or t o B arnett ’ s a rr es tw er e s u f f ic ie n t to e s tab lis h p r o b ab le c a u s e . Se e L a c e y v . M a r ic o p a C o u n ty , 693 F . 3d 896, 918 ( 9th C i r . 2012) . B e f or e a rr e s t i ng B a rne tt , the of f i c e r s kne w : ( 1) the gun3

w as re gi st er ed t o B arnett ; (2) the gu n w as i n an ank l e hol st er , w hi ch m ade i tea si er t o c onc e a l ( e ve n i f

B a rne ttha d be e n f

r i s ke d) ; ( 3) a f

t e rf i r s tbe i ng appr oa c he d on th e s id e w a lk a n d b e f

o r e e n te r in g th e r o o m w h e r e h e a w a ite d h is in te rv ie w , B a rn e tt w a s n e v e ro u ts id e th e p r e s e n c e o f th e o f f ic e r s ; ( 4 ) th e o f

f ic e r s le f t B a rn e tt una tt e nde d i n the w a i t i ng r oom ; ( 5) the gun w a s c onc e a l e d unde rthe c ouc h, a dj a c e ntt o w he r e B a rne ttw a s s e a t e d w hi l e w a i t i ng f orhi s i nt e rvi e w ; a nd ( 6) do orm en, hand l i ng m on eyfor a du l t -ori ent ed event s, ar e oft ent i m es arm ed. O nce the of f i c e r s ha d c ol l e c t e d e vi de nc e s uf f i c i e ntf orpr obabl e c a us e , the y ha d no ob l i gat i on t o ensure thatthere w as no tsom e i nn ocentexpl anat i on for thi s e vi dence b e f o r e a rr e s tin g B a rn e tt. U ni te d State s v . T

hom as , 86 3 F . 2d 62 2, 62 7 (9th C i r. 1 9 8 8 ) ( “[ t]h e te s t is n o t w h e th e rth e c o n d u c t u n d e rq u e s tio n is c o n s is te n t w ith in n o c e n t b e h a v io r ; la w e n f o r c e m e n t o f

f ic e r s d o n o t h a v e to ru le o u t th e p o s s ib ility of i nn ocentbehavi or, ” i nt ernal ci t at i on om i tt ed). S i nc e the of

f i c e r s ha d pr obabl e c a us e t o a rr e s tB a rne tt , w e do notr e a c h the i ssu e o f q u al i fi ed i m m u n i ty. A F F I R M E D .