alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of SportsNuts, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, Kenneth I. Denos, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2004
                              By       /s/ Kenneth I. Denos
                              ------------------------------------------------
                                       Kenneth I. Denos
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY TO REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,026                  45,997
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,646                  23,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500                     675
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,623                  73,759
<PP&E>                                           1,695                   4,668
<DEPRECIATION>                                     564                     918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,754                  77,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,029                  24,067
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           182                     217
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,489                  50,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,754                  77,509
<SALES>                                        103,676                 123,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,676                 123,400
<CGS>                                           72,414                  89,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,417                 109,651
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    27                     878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   302                     299
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (164)                      43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,396                  12,828
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                   4,136
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,396                   8,692
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,396                   8,692
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.60                    0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60                    0.20
        

</TABLE>
Lawrence Berkeley 

National Laboratory 

Work Group Report 

Advisory Board on Radiation 

and Worker Health 

Oakland , California 

February 28, 2012 
Work Group Members and Staff

 BOARD

 Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair

 Dr. David Richardson

 Dr. Richard Lemen

 NIOSH/DCAS

 Dr. Laura Hughes

 SC&A

 Joseph Fitzgerald
LBNL Site History

 1931: LBNL founded on Berkeley Campus

 1941: E.O. Lawrence started defense contract with 

National Defense Research Committee

 August 13, 1942: Start of Manhattan Engineer 

District (MED) and covered period for LBNL

 1945: LBNL started to migrate operations to Hill 

east of Berkeley campus

 Numerous buildings on campus and on “the Hill” 

involved in LBNL and MED/Atomic Energy 

Commission (AEC) sponsored research activities

 LBNL is still operating today

Courtesy of Dr. Laura Hughes
LBNL Site Operations

 Particle accelerator development for 

radioisotope generation: 

 Cyclotons, 4-inch to 184-inch 

 300 MeV Synchrotron

 Van de Graaff generator

 Bevatron

 Heavy Ion Linear Accelerator (HILAC)

 Radiochemistry and isolation of new 

elements

 Pu and many more

Courtesy of Dr. Laura Hughes
LBNL Site Operations (continued)

 Study of fundamental particles

 Uranium enrichment research

 Calutron technology used at Y-12

 Radiation operations took place in all 

laboratories and buildings affiliated with 

LBNL (campus and “the Hill”)

Courtesy of Dr. Laura Hughes
Existing SEC Class for LBNL

 SEC Petition 00160 approval recommended by 

NIOSH January 5, 2010

 Board accepted NIOSH recommendation on 

March 5, 2010

 On April 5, 2010, the Secretary of HHS 

designated the SEC Class for the period 1942 –

1961 primarily based on inability to reconstruct 

internal doses with sufficient accuracy 
Definition of SEC Class at LBNL

 All employees of the Department of Energy, its 

predecessor agencies, and their contractors and 

subcontractors who worked at the Lawrence Berkeley 

National Laboratory in Berkeley, California, from 

August 13, 1942 through December 31, 1961, for a 

number of work days aggregating at least 250 work 

days, occurring either solely under this employment or 

in combination with work days within the parameters 

established for one or more other classes of employees 

included in the Special Exposure Cohort.
Current focus of Work Group

 Reviewed findings of SC&A on initial Site 

Profile and on revision (May 10, 2010 version)

 Summary of findings to be presented by Joseph 

Fitzgerald of SC&A

 Reviewed initial responses to findings provided 

by NIOSH

 Next meeting planned for mid-September. Will 

follow up on all issues in the findings matrix.
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I,  Andre Benard the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Calibert Explorations Ltd.. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the Quarter  ended February 28, 2009, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/  Andre BenardName:Andre BenardTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:April 13, 2009 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Pacific  Bepure  Industry Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q,  for the fiscal  quarter  ended  September 30, 2010, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Haiting Li,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: November 15, 2010
                                                   /s/ Haiting Li
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Haiting Li
                                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 12

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                            YEAR ENDED      YEAR ENDED      YEAR ENDED
                                                                           DECEMBER 31,    DECEMBER 31,    DECEMBER 31,
                                                                              1999             1998           1997
                                                                           ------------    ------------    ------------
                                                                                      (Dollars in thousands)
<S>                                                                         <C>              <C>              <C>

Earnings:
     Pre-tax (loss) income before reorganization items
        and extraordinary item ..........................................   $ (29,013)       $(205,715)       $  25,801
     Add:
          Interest and fixed charges ....................................      44,395          125,458           86,836
          Portion of rent under long-term operating leases representative
             of an interest factor ......................................           0                0                0
                                                                            ---------        ---------        ---------
     Total earnings available for fixed charges .........................      15,382          (80,257)         112,637
                                                                            ---------        ---------        ---------
Fixed charges:
          Interest and fixed charges ....................................      44,395          125,458           86,836
          Portion of rent under long-term leases representative of
             an interest factor .........................................           0                0                0
                                                                            ---------        ---------        ---------
     Total fixed charges ................................................      44,395          125,458           86,836
                                                                            ---------        ---------        ---------
     Deficiency in earnings to cover fixed charges ......................      29,013           80,257             --
     Ratio of earnings to fixed charges .................................        0.35             --               1.30
</TABLE>
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 5, 2014

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-1511

Lower Tribunal No. 13-39670

________________



### Regents Park Investments, LLC., a Florida Limited Liability

Company

, Appellant,

vs.



### KAI Properties, LTD, a Florida Limited Partnership

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ronald

Dresnick

, Judge.

Arnaldo Velez

, for appellant.

Duane Morris, Lida Rodriguez-Taseff, Nicole L. Levy and Charles C. Papy,

III ; Joel S. Perwin, for appellee.

Before WELLS, EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.

WELLS, Judge.Contract purchaser Regents Park Investments, LLC, appeals from a final

summary judgment following dismissal of its single-count complaint for specific

performance of a real estate sales transaction. Because the default provision

detailed in the contract for purchase and sale does not limit the remedies available

to the purchaser in the event of a default by the seller, the court below erred in

concluding that an action for specific performance could not be asserted. See

Coastal Computer Corp. v. Team Mgmt. Sys., Inc.

, 624 So. 2d 352, 352-53 (Fla.

2d DCA 1993) (finding that the appellant could “pursue any remedy that the law

affords” where the parties’ contract set out one remedy for its breach, but did not

also provide that this was an exclusive remedy); Dillard Homes, Inc. v. Carroll

,

152 So. 2d 738, 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963) (confirming that where contract language

“discloses that the parties intended to limit [a non-breaching party’s] remedy in the

event” of default, remedies other than that provided in the contract, to include

specific performance, are precluded).

Accordingly, the judgment entered below is reversed and this matter

remanded for further proceedings.

2
Dose Reconstruction Audits – 18th Set 1 January 17, 2014 

NOTICE: This report has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82. 

M E M O 

DATE: January 17, 2014

TO: R.W. Field, PhD and R.A. Lemen, PhD 

CC: John Stiver, CHP, Project Manager; John Mauro, PhD, CHP; Doug Farver, CHP; 

Rose Gogliotti; Nicole Briggs; Dose Reconstruction Subcommittee; Ted Katz 

FROM: U. Hans Behling, PhD, MPH 

SUBJECT: Westinghouse Nuclear Fuels Division Dose Reconstruction Case from 18th set

On January 9, 2014, SC&A conducted its one-on-one conference call with Drs. Field and Lemen. 

One of the dose reconstruction (DR) cases reviewed concerned an energy employee (EE) who 

worked at the Westinghouse Nuclear Fuels Division (WNFD) during the time when the 

Westinghouse facility received shipments of nuclear materials that included plutonium from the 

West Valley facility. 

For guidance in the reconstruction of dose, NIOSH employed a document titled, Dose 

Reconstruction Methodology for Westinghouse Nuclear Fuels Division, Cheswick, PA, which 

was issued on June 8, 2012. 

As part of the one-on-one discussion of the audit for this case, SC&A identified the following 

issues/findings related to said WNFD document: 

 This document was not referenced in NIOSH’s DR Report.

 This document has not been acknowledged/identified to SC&A for use in DR. 

(Correspondingly, this document has not been formally reviewed for use in DR.) 

 As part of SC&A’s audit of this case, SC&A’s limited review of this document identified 

concerns regarding cited activity ratios defined for 12%, 10-year-old fuel grade 

plutonium. 

On the assumption that cited activity ratios may be in error and may have affected other DRs, 

both Board members requested SC&A to identify the number of potential DRs that may have 

been based on data/guidance contained in the WNFD document. 

SC&A’s review of the NOCTS database identified the following: 

 To date, a total of 98 WNFD cases have been completed. 

 Of the 98 completed cases, completion of 19 cases post-date the document’s issue date of 

June 8, 2012, and may, therefore, reflect guidance cited in said document. 

 The balance of 79 WNFD cases was completed prior to June 8, 2012. Without further 

investigation, it is uncertain what guidance documents (if any) were used in behalf of the 

79 DRs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7920

CURTIS RICHARDSON, a/k/a Curtis D. Richardson, a/k/a Curtis 

Dale Richardson,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

PHILLIP THOMPSON, Sheriff of Horry County,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. 

(4:15-cv-02638-RBH)

Submitted: February 25, 2016 Decided: March 2, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Curtis Richardson, a federal prisoner, appeals the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge 

and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Richardson v. Thompson, No. 4:15-cv-02638-RBH (D.S.C. Nov. 

20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5689 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide for the inclusion of the names 

of the crew members of the USS Frank E. Evans killed on June 

3, 1969 on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2018 

Mr. CRAMER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide for the inclusion of the names of the crew members of the USS 

Frank E. Evans killed on June 3, 1969 on the Vietnam 

Veterans Memorial. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF CERTAIN NAMES ON THE VIET4 NAM VETERANS MEMORIAL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

6 provide for the inclusion on the Vietnam Veterans Memo7 rial in the District of Columbia the names of the seventyVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:18 May 14, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5689.IH H5689

amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5689 IH

1 four crew members of the USS Frank E. Evans killed on 

2 June 3, 1969. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 21.1**

**GOLF TRUST OFAMERICA, INC.LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

GTA GP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

GTA LP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

Golf Trust of America, L.P., a Delaware limitedpartnership in which GTA GP, Inc. is the sole general partner.

GTA—Tierra Del Sol, LLC, a South Carolina limitedliability company

GTA—Black Bear, LLC, a South Carolina limitedliability company

GTA—Stonehenge, LLC, a South Carolina limitedliability company

GTA—IB, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

GTA—IB Operations, LLC, a Florida limited liabilitycompany

GTA—IB Management, LLC, a Florida limited liabilitycompany

GTA—IB Condominium, LLC, a Florida limited liabilitycompany

GTA—IB Golf Resort, LLC, a Florida limited liabilitycompany

Golf Host Securities, Inc., a Florida corporation

----
Exhibit 10.11
                     SIXTH AMENDMENT TO
               ENRON CORP. 1988 DEFERRAL PLAN


     WHEREAS, Enron Corp. (the "Company") has heretofore
adopted the Enron Corp. 1988 Deferral Plan (the "Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended effective as of
July 1, 1999:

     The second paragraph of Section 7.2 of the Plan is
deleted and replaced with the following paragraph:

     "For purposes of this Plan, the divestiture by Enron
     Corp. of a subsidiary, division or other unit, whether
     by way of a sale of stock or assets, shall not be
     deemed to be a termination of employment under this
     Plan, and a Participant affected by such divestiture
     shall continue to participate in the Plan as long such
     Participant continues to be employed by either the
     divested entity or the purchaser of assets (a
     "Successor Employer"), or a controlled group of
     corporations within the meaning of section 414(b) of
     the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, of which
     the Successor Employer is a member ("Controlled
     Group").  When such Participant is no longer employed
     by a Successor Employer or a member of such Controlled
     Group, then for purposes of this Plan, such termination
     of employment shall be deemed to be a voluntary
     termination of employment under this paragraph 7.2
     unless such termination of employment is for a reason
     described in paragraph 7.1 or paragraphs 7.3 through
     7.6.  If the reason such Participant is no longer
     employed by a Successor Employer or a member of such
     Controlled Group is because of a divestiture by such
     Successor Employer a member of such Controlled Group,
     then such Participant will be deemed to have been
     Involuntarily Terminated pursuant to paragraph 7.4.
     Upon such termination of employment for any reason, a
     Participant shall give immediate written notice to
     Enron Corp."

     As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified
and reaffirmed.

     Date:  August 11, 1999.

                              ENRON CORP.

                              By: /s/ MARY K. JOYCE
                                   Mary K. Joyce
                                   Vice-President,
                                   Compensation & Benefits

ATTEST:

/s/ REBECCA C. CARTER