alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EMMANUEL CLARK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-1094

[December 1, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; William L. Roby, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 2016CF002736A.

Emmanuel Clark, Live Oak, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
5, ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

by
4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46
Cincinnati, Ohio 45226
(513) 533-6825

November 8, 2005

The Honorable Michael O. Leavitt
Secretary of Health and Human Services

eR PhD. Department of Health and Human Services
Lafayette, Indiana 200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Washington, DC 20201
MEMBERS:
Henry A. Anderson, M.D. Dear Mr. Secretary:
Madison, Wisconsin
Roy L. DeHart, M.D., M.P.H. The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has
ESI) VereneneS evaluated SEC Petition -00034 concerning workers in Building #2 at the
Richard L, Espinosa National Bureau of Standards in Washington, D.C. under the statutory
Eapariolgy Hew Moxon requirements established by EEOICPA and incorporated into 42 CFR Sec.
Michael H. Gibson 83.13 (c) (1) and 42 CFR Sec. 83.13 (c) (3). The Board respectfully
Erankiin: Onis recommends that a Special Exposure Cohort be accorded to all National
Mark A. Griffon Bureau of Standards employees who worked in Building #2 at this facility
Salem, New Hampahirs from 1943 to 1952 and whom were employed for a number of work days
James M, Melius, M.D., Ph.D. aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring under this employment or in
salteeny, Newt ork combination with work days of employment occurring within the parameters
Wanda |. Munn (excluding aggregate work day requirements) established for other classes of
einen eng employees included in the SEC. This recommendation is based on the
Charles L. Owens following factors:
Paducah, Kentucky
Robert W. Presley e These workers were employed at a facility that handled substantial
Clinton Tennessee amounts of radioactive materials during the early time period for the
Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D. production of nuclear weapons.

Elysian, Minnesota

e NIOSH was unable to find any personal or area monitoring data or

STAFF: other data that would be useful for individual dose reconstruction for
these workers. However, available data indicates that these workers
may have accumulated substantial chronic exposures through episodic
have ve wage BD intakes of radionuclides, combined with external exposures to gamma,

Ben beta, and neutron radiation. Furthermore, radiological contamination
in the building extended beyond the laboratories in which the
physicists worked.

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY:

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT :

LaShawn D. Shields

Atlanta, Georgia © NIOSH has determined that the health of employees at this facility

may have been endangered by their radiation exposures. The Board
concurs.


The Honorable Michael O. Leavitt November 8, 2005

Based on these considerations, the Board recommends that this Special Exposure Cohort petition be
granted.

Enclosed is supporting documentation from the Advisory Board Meeting held October 19. 2005 in
Knoxville, Tennessee. This documentation includes transcripts of public comments on the petition,
copies of the petition and the NIOSH review thereof, and related documents distributed by NIOSH
and the petitioners. If any of these items are unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly.

Sincerely,

LE ZY

Paul L. Ziemer, Chairman
Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Enc.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Vita Food Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in thecapacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2006 | By:                                             | /s/  Clifford K. Bolen |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                 |                                            | Clifford K. Bolen,               |   |
|                 | Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, |
|                 |                                            | Chief Financial Officer          |   |
|                 | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)    |
|                      |                                                 |                                  |        |  |  |  |  |

 

1

----
----

----

| Principal Executive Officer        | Principal Financial Officer |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                               |                        |
| CLIPPER FUND, INC.                 | CLIPPER FUND, INC.          |
|                               |                        |
| /s/ Kenneth C. Eich                | /s/ Douglas A. Haines       |
|                               |                        |
| Kenneth C. Eich                    | Douglas A. Haines           |
| Principal Executive Officer        | Principal Financial Officer |
| Date:  February 24, 2014 | Date: February 24, 2014     |

----

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Tri-Mark MFG, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Barry Sytner
                                 ----------------------
                                 Barry Sytner
                                 Chief Executive Officer

May 20, 2009


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Tri-Mark MFG, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Betty Soumekh
                                 ----------------------
                                 Betty Soumekh
                                 Chief Financial Officer

May 20, 2009
```

                                  EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002,  I,  the  undersigned  officer  of  the Greenrock
Ventures, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 of  the Company
fully  complies,  in  all  material  respects, with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act  of  1934,  and  the information
contained  in  the  Report  fairly  represents,  in all material respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required  by  Section  906 has been
provided  to  the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished  to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                               By:   /s/ Andriy Zinchuk
                                               --------------------------------
                                               President and Director and
                                               Chief Executive Officer,
                                               Chief Financial Officer and
                                               Principal Accounting Officer

Date: October 5, 2010
```
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LINDSAY JENKINS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv1-RH/WCS

PETER BLANC et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER OF TRANSFER

The plaintiff complains of state-court foreclosure proceedings originating in

Palm Beach County. Palm Beach County is in the Southern District of Florida. 

The plaintiff names a number of defendants including the chief justice of the

Florida Supreme Court. That court sits in Tallahassee, in the Northern District of

Florida. The plaintiff filed the case in the Northern District of Florida.

The magistrate judgment entered a report and recommendation, ECF No. 4, 

that concluded the case should be transferred to the Southern District under 28

U.S.C. § 1404(a). The plaintiff filed objections, ECF No. 5, a request for an

evidentiary hearing, ECF No. 6, and a letter, ECF No. 7. The letter asserted illegal

conduct by the magistrate judge and by me, even though at that time I had taken no
Page 2 of 3

action in the case at all. 

The plaintiff asserted in his objections that a court cannot properly transfer a

case on its own motion. The assertion is unfounded under settled law, as the

Eleventh Circuit held again just last month. See Tazoe v. Airbus S.A.S., 631 F.3d

1321, 1336 (11th Cir. 2011) (noting that a court may transfer a case under

§ 1404(a) on its own motion so long as the plaintiff is given notice and an

opportunity to be heard). 

The plaintiff also asserted that he was given no notice or opportunity to be

heard on the propriety of transfer, but that was not true. He was given the

opportunity to be heard by objecting to the report and recommendation, and in fact

he took advantage of the opportunity. I nonetheless entered an order providing the

plaintiff yet another opportunity to be heard on the propriety of transfer. The order

also set a deadline for the plaintiff to do so. He chose to file nothing further. 

I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the plaintiff’s objections,

hearing request, and letter. Upon consideration, 

IT IS ORDERED: 

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court’s

further opinion. The case is transferred to the United States District Court for the 

Case No: 4:11cv1-RH/WCS
Page 3 of 3

Southern District of Florida. The clerk must take all steps necessary to effect the

transfer.

SO ORDERED on March 17, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case No: 4:11cv1-RH/WCS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosures of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel, Tissue Engineering.                    

*Date:*                         March 11, 2008.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Head Marriott, One Hotel Circle, Hilton Head Island, SC 29928.                    

*Contact Person:*                         John K. Hayes, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 959, Democracy Two, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-3398,                         *hayesj@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: January 4, 2008.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 08-66 Filed 1-10-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

INL/ANL-W Work Group

Teleconference: August 14, 2017 

10:30 a.m. Eastern Time

Conference Phone: 1-866-659-0537; Participant Code: 9933701#

Welcome and roll call

1. NIOSH SEC Petition Evaluation for CPP recommended class extension: 1975-

1980 and other CPP-related NIOSH activities

2. SC&A Review of CPP internal exposure to alpha radiation prior to 1963

3. Petitioner Comments (optional)

4. Plans for August Board Meeting and status/path forward on ongoing issues 

resolution for INL/ANL-W. 

Adjourn
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4836

_____________________________

STAR POINTE CAPITAL, LLC, as 

Trustee of the 3057 Haley Lane 

Land Trust,

Appellant,

v.

ROBERT M. SCHVEY, et al.,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tyrie Boyer, Judge.

March 29, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Bryant H. Dunivan of Owen & Dunivan, PLLC, Tampa, for 

Appellant.

Seth L. Rothstein of Adams Rothstein & Siegel, Jacksonville; 

Daniel M. Copeland of Daniel M. Copeland, Attorney at Law, P.A., 

Jacksonville, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In connection with this Quarterly Report of Energy and Technology, Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,  George M. Sfeir, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.
Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Energy and Technology, Corp.
  By: /s/George M. Sfeir,
 George M. Sfeir
 President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
  November 15, 2010
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-1293

___________

Thomas H. Bray, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of North Dakota.

Bank of America; MERS Inc. *

(Mortgage Electronic Registration * [UNPUBLISHED]

Systems); Countrywide Home Loans, *

*

Appellees. *

____________________________ *

*

Countrywide Home Loans; Bank of *

America; and MERS Inc., as a *

nominee of America’s Home Loans *

LLC, its successors and assigns, *

*

Counter Claimants, *

*

v. *

*

Thomas H. Bray, individually and as *

alleged Trustee of Multigrain CPT a/k/a *

Multigrains CPT; Michael D. Harris, *

Trustee of Bray 10 Family Trust; Ken *

Campbell, also known as Kenneth *

Campbell; Sharenda Bray Wiebe; *
Devin Bray; and Portfolio Recovery *

Associates, *

*

Counter Defendants. *

___________

Submitted: September 28, 2011

Filed: October 4, 2011 

___________

Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Bray appeals the district court’s adverse summary judgment decision 1

in this action involving Bray’s complaint seeking to quiet title to his property, and

defendants’ counterclaim seeking foreclosure on that property and several other

specific forms of relief. Because the district court’s judgment did not fully dispose

of all of the claims in this action, and in particular did not address all of the relief

requested and all of the counterclaim defendants, we lack jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 (courts of appeals shall have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions

of district courts); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) (any order that adjudicates fewer than all

claims does not end action as to any claims or parties); Thomas v. Basham, 931 F.2d

521, 522-23 (8thCir. 1991) (jurisdictional issues will be raised sua sponte when there

is indication that jurisdiction is lacking). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

______________________________

The Honorable Daniel L. Hovland, United StatesDistrictJudge for the District 1

of North Dakota. 

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SYNTROLEUM'S
CONSOLIDATED  STATEMENT  OF  INCOME  FOR  THE  YEAR  ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS  OF  DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN IT'S
ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO  SUCH  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       20316
<SECURITIES>                                  3565
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1193
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             25439
<PP&E>                                        7536
<DEPRECIATION>                               (1094)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               39591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2641
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       347
<OTHER-SE>                                   24832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 39591
<SALES>                                       1219
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              3855
<CGS>                                          824
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                12468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (17158)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (17158)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (17158)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.64)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Ralph J Takala, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisreport for the period ended September 30, 2009 on Form 10-Q ofAdelphia Recovery Trust;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e))****for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,****the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 6,  2009 |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
| /s/ Ralph J. Takala          |   |
| Ralph J. Takala              |
| Trustee                      |

 

----