alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 20 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 13

- 00965

- CV

DONNA LYNN MORALE , Appellant

V.

ELIZABETH WILLIAMS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1036556

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed October 14, 2013 . No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On January 10, 2014 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’ s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days,2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this cou rt with proof of payment for the record. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Brown.
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-41363

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DWAYNE CHANDLER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-246-16

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Dwayne Chandler has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Chandler has filed a response. The record is insufficiently

developed to allow consideration at this time of Chandler’s claims of ineffective

assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal

when they have not been raised before the district court since no opportunity

existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-41363

2

Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and

Chandler’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Chandler’s motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.
FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/4/2015 1:54:01 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Report to which this schedule
relates and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>     0001028965
<NAME>                          SPECIAL METALS CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          9,064
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 123,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,894)
<INVENTORY>                                   262,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              430,456
<PP&E>                                        352,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                (74,254)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                811,287
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         146,734
<BONDS>                                       259,035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         104,494
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          155
<OTHER-SE>                                     76,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  811,287
<SALES>                                       602,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              602,249
<CGS>                                         562,486
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 562,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             25,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,442)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (16,132)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,310)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,310)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      2.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.05


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wollemi Mining Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher
Coldicutt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
28th day of July, 2008.


/s/ Christopher Coldicutt
-------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sienna Resources, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Julie Carter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
21st day of October, 2008.


/s/ Julie Carter
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JEAN BAPTISTE JEAN VANUS,

Petitioner,

v. 4:11cv208-WS

ERIC H. HOLDER, et al.,

Respondent.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 6)

docketed May 31, 2011. The magistrate judge recommends that the petitioner's §

2241petition be denied as moot in light of the fact that the petitioner no longer appears

to be custody and because the petitioner has not kept the court advised as to his

current whereabouts.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED as moot.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "The petition is DENIED as moot."

Case 4:11-cv-00208-WS-WCS Document 8 Filed 06/20/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of June , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00208-WS-WCS Document 8 Filed 06/20/11 Page 2 of 2
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

TBD 6000 Work Group Meeting

February 14, 2024

Videoconference:

Join ZoomGov Meeting

https://cdc.zoomgov.com/j/16067633819?pwd=RUdiYXlZZHFKanpJOHZrcGJIbTlaZz09

Teleconference:

Phone: +1 (646) 828-7666 (U.S. East)

Phone: +1 (669) 254-5252 (U.S. West)

Meeting ID: 160 6763 3819

Passcode: 98685439

1:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) Start

Welcome and Roll Call

1. Introductory Remarks on Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Co. (Work Group Chair)

2. Evaluation of uranium working days for Joslyn Manufacturing: SCA-TR-SP2015-0050, 

Rev. 0, “Review of Site Profiles for Atomic Weapons Employers That Worked Uranium 

Metals: Appendix J-Joslyn” (SC&A Presentation)

3. Responses to SCA-TR-SP2015-0050, Rev. 0, “Review of Site Profiles for Atomic 

Weapons Employers That Worked Uranium Metals: Appendix J-Joslyn” (Rev. 0; NIOSH 

Presentation

4. Workgroup Discussion

5. Workgroup Discussion of Path Forward

Adjourn
Exhibit 4.3







Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated December 3, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-207273) of Smart Trust, Tax
Free Income Trust, Series 21.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


December 3, 2015
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136727 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices

v SC: 136727 COA: 285117 Kent CC: 07-008371-FH IDRIS QUENTILL WILKES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for le ave to appeal the June 5, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY
, J., would grant leave to appeal for th e reasons set forth in her dissenting statement in People v Conway , 474 Mich 1140 (2006).

p0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

iGATE
Corporation

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 333-162606 and Form S-8 (No. 333-20033, 333-71057 and 333-134689) of iGATE Corporation of our report dated March 17, 2008 except for Note 4
dated February 16, 2009 (February 22, 2010 as to the effects of the retrospective adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 as described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements), relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.



|                    
|--------------------
|/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

February 25, 2010
Ameritas
Life
Insurance
Corp.


 


RETURN
OF PREMIUM
DEATH
BENEFIT
RIDER


 


This
rider
is made
a part
of the
policy
and is
based
on the
application
and payment
of the
premium.
 This
rider
is subject
to the
terms
and provisions
of the
policy
and this
rider.
 If
there
is a
conflict
between
the
terms
of the
policy
and the
terms
of this
rider,
the
rider language
controls.
 This
rider
may
not be
cancelled
and will
terminate
based
on the
‘Termination’
provision
below.


 


BENEFITS.
 This
rider
provides
that
we will
pay a
guaranteed
minimum
death
benefit
(GMDB)
that
is equal
to the
greater
of the
policy
death
benefit
as described
in the
‘Death
Benefit’
provision
of the
policy
and an
amount
described
below.


 


The
amount
of the
GMDB
depends on
the
date
that
proof
of death
is received.
 If
you
die
prior
to this
rider
being
terminated,
the
death
benefit
is payable
under this
rider.
 The
GMDB
amount
cannot
be withdrawn.
 If
the policy
to which
this
rider
is attached
is jointly
owned,
then
the
death
benefit
is payable
upon the
death
of the
first
owner.


 


The
amount
of the
death
benefit
will
be included
in the
annual report.


 


CALCULATION
OF THE
GUARANTEED
MINIMUM
DEATH
BENEFIT.
 The
GMDB
equals
the
greater
of policy
accumulation
value and
the
adjusted
guaranteed
premium
as described
below.


 


ADJUSTED
GUARANTEED
PREMIUM.
 The
adjusted
guaranteed
premium
is the
total
premium
paid
into
the policy
less
an adjustment
for
each
withdrawal
based
on the
proportion
that
the
withdrawal
amount
has to
the policy
accumulation
value prior
to the
withdrawal.
 The
adjusted
guaranteed
premium
after
a withdrawal
will
be equal to
(A) minus
the
result
of multiplying
(A) by
the
quotient
of (B)
divided
by (C)
as shown
in the
formula:


 


A
- (A
* (B /
C))


 


where:


 


(A)
= the
adjusted
guaranteed
premium
prior
to the
withdrawal;


(B)
= withdrawal
amount
(including
any applicable
surrender
charges);


(C)
= policy’s
accumulation
value prior
to the
withdrawal.


 


RIDER CHARGE.  Beginning with the policy date, each month until the rider terminates, we will deduct
a rider charge pro-rata from your fixed account and subaccounts. The current and maximum charges are shown on the rider
schedule.  When your rider is issued, the current charge applies.  After the
first policy year, we reserve the right to
change the
current charge at any time; however, your charge will never exceed the maximum charge.
 If the rider charge rate increases, we will notify you at least 30 days prior to the policy anniversary.


 


TERMINATION.
 This
rider
terminates
on the
earliest
of the
following:


(1)
 the
death
of an
owner;
or


(2)
 the
policy
maturity
date;
or


(3)  the date that the policy’s accumulation
value reduces to
zero; or


(4)  the date the policy is terminated.


 


 


AMERITAS
LIFE
INSURANCE
CORP.


 


 


 


	[	SPECIMEN	SPECIMEN	]
	   President	Secretary   


 


 


 


ICC15 ROP 8-15
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5904 

To amend the Sherman Act to make oil-producing and exporting cartels 

illegal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2018 

Mr. CHABOT (for himself, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. NADLER, Mr. 

MARINO, and Mrs. HANDEL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Sherman Act to make oil-producing and 

exporting cartels illegal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Oil Producing and 

5 Exporting Cartels Act of 2018’’ or ‘‘NOPEC’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SHERMAN ACT. 

7 The Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) is amended 

8 by adding after section 7 the following: 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5904 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 7A. OIL PRODUCING CARTELS. 

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be illegal and a violation 

3 of this Act for any foreign state, or any instrumentality 

4 or agent of any foreign state, to act collectively or in com5 bination with any other foreign state, any instrumentality 

6 or agent of any other foreign state, or any other person, 

7 whether by cartel or any other association or form of co8 operation or joint action— 

9 ‘‘(1) to limit the production or distribution of 

10 oil, natural gas, or any other petroleum product; 

11 ‘‘(2) to set or maintain the price of oil, natural 

12 gas, or any petroleum product; or 

13 ‘‘(3) to otherwise take any action in restraint of 

14 trade for oil, natural gas, or any petroleum product; 

15 when such action, combination, or collective action has a 

16 direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect on 

17 the market, supply, price, or distribution of oil, natural 

18 gas, or other petroleum product in the United States. 

19 ‘‘(b) SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.—A foreign state en20 gaged in conduct in violation of subsection (a) shall not 

21 be immune under the doctrine of sovereign immunity from 

22 the jurisdiction or judgments of the courts of the United 

23 States in any action brought to enforce this section. 

24 ‘‘(c) INAPPLICABILITY OF ACT OF STATE DOC25 TRINE.—No court of the United States shall decline, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5904 IH

1 based on the act of state doctrine, to make a determina2 tion on the merits in an action brought under this section. 

3 ‘‘(d) ENFORCEMENT.—The Attorney General of the 

4 United States may bring an action to enforce this section 

5 in any district court of the United States as provided 

6 under the antitrust laws.’’. 

7 SEC. 3. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY. 

8 Section 1605(a) of title 28 of the United States Code 

9 is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (5) by striking ‘‘or’’ after the 

11 semicolon, 

12 (2) in paragraph (6) by striking the period and 

13 inserting ‘‘; or’’, and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(7) in an action brought under section 7A of 

16 the Sherman Act.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 14, 2008)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 27719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1263]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 14, 2008 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 27719]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2008-19 of May 5, 2008

                
Proposed Agreement Between the Government of the 
                United States of America and the Government of the 
                Russian Federation for Cooperation in the Field of 
                Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the 
                Secretary of Energy

                I have considered the proposed Agreement Between the 
                Government of the United States of America and the 
                Government of the Russian Federation for Cooperation in 
                the Field of Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, along 
                with the views, recommendations, and statements of 
                interested agencies.

                I have determined that the performance of the Agreement 
                will promote, and will not constitute an unreasonable 
                risk to, the common defense and security. Pursuant to 
                section 123 b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
                amended (42 U.S.C. 2153(b)), I hereby approve the 
                proposed Agreement and authorize the Secretary of State 
                to arrange for its execution.

                The Secretary of State is authorized to publish this 
                determination in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 5, 2008.

[FR Doc. 08-1263
Filed 5-13-08; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
Exhibit
32




Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BNH Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nehemya Hesin,
Chief  Executive and Financial Officer of
the  Company,  certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
      May 4, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Nehemya
      HesinNehemya
      HesinPresident,
      Treasurer and DirectorPrincipal
      Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial
      and Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-4033

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KEVIN MILLER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR02-133-DWS) Submitted: June 30, 2003 Decided: September 2, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Allen B. Burnside, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., United States Attorney, William K. Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Kevin Alexander Miller was convicted by a jury of being a felon in possession of ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (2000) and sentenced, under 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(e) (West Supp. 2003), to 236 months imprisonment. On appeal, he raises one issue: whether the district court erred by declining his proferred jury instruction regarding whether he knowingly possessed the ammunition. We do not find that the district court abused its discretion by declining to issue the disputed instruction. United States v. Abbas , 74 F.3d 506, 513 (4th Cir. 1996). The instruction the district court used was adequate and accurate, United States v. Pupo, 841 F.2d 1235, 1240 (4th Cir. 1988), and its decision to deny the instruction did not constitute reversible error. United States v. Lewis , 53 F.3d 29, 32-33 (4th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of First China Pharmaceutical Group, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Yi Jia Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




i.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
      and




ii.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
November 17, 2010





/s/ Yi Jia LiName:
              Yi
      Jia LiTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer andPrincipal
      Accounting Officer)