alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>        5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                                 651
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       32,283
<ALLOWANCES>                                        24,922
<INVENTORY>                                         11,650
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    47,579
<PP&E>                                           1,429,617
<DEPRECIATION>                                     652,429
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     824,767
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,307,293
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            356
<COMMON>                                             6,794
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,489,676)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       824,767
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    10,017
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,608,003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    36,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    24,922
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 109,764
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,710,477)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,710,477)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (546,577)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,257,054)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (4.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (4.35)


</TABLE>
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. C AR L OS GO NZ AL E Z - AL VA R AD O, a. k. a. Jose A l cara z A l vara do , a. k. a. C a r a l os G onz a l e z - A l var a do, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 12- 10268 D . C. N o . 4 : 1 1 - c r - 0 0 4 4 3 - RCC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona R ane rC . C ol l i ns , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 16, 2013 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , I K U T A , an dW A T F O R D , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . C a r l os G onz a l e z - A l var a do appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd c ha l l e nge s the 41- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f or r e e ntrya f

t e rde port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. P ur s uantt o A nder s v . 

# FI LED APR22 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 10268 2 Ca lifo rn ia , 38 6 U . S . 73 8 (19 67 ), G on za l ez -A l vara do ’ s c ou nselhas f i l ed a bri ef st at i ng thatthere ar e no g roun ds for r el i ef , al on g w i th a m ot i on t o w i thd raw as coun se l of re cord. W e have provi ded G on za l ez -A l vara do the op po rtun i ty t o fi l e a pro se s up pl em ent albri ef . N o p ro se supp l em ent albri ef or answ er i ng bri ef

has b e e n f ile d . G onz a l e z - A l var a do ha s w a i ve d hi s r i ghtt o appe a l hi s s e nt e nc e . O ur i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of

the r e c or d pur s uantt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 488 U . S . 75, 80 ( 1 9 8 8 ) , d is c lo s e s n o a r g u ab le is s u e a s to th e v a lid ityo f th e w a iv e r . See U

ni ted States v . W

at s on , 5 8 2 F . 3 d9 7 4 , 9 8 6 -8 8 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ). W e acco rd i n g l y d i sm i ss th e ap p e a l. Se e i d. a t 9 8 8 . C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s GR AN T E D. DI S MI S S E D.
Pantex Plant

Special Exposure Cohort -

Bounding Uranium Intakes

Mark R. Rolfes, M.S.

Health Physicist

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

August 2011

Richland, WA
• Conduct surveillance testi and evaluati

Pantex Plant Mission

• Develop and fabricate high explosives • Assemble finished parts into nuclear wea

• Conduct surveillance testing and evaluati

ng 

• Retrofits and modifications • Dismantlement of retired weapons 
Uranium Exposure Potentia

• Assembly operations involve handling of 

new depleted uranium components 

• Memorandum to Y-12 dated 1959 explicitly pronounced Pantex’s “Commitment to allow 

detectable removable contamination into the assembly area.” 

• Potential for internal exposure from the h

of new uranium parts is low 

• Review of >5,000 Pantex workplace air monit

results (1960s-1990s), >200,000 contaminatio(1980s – 2010), and source term information years) all support the low exposure potential 
W28 dismantlement operations from 198

Uranium Exposure Potential–

• Higher potential for intake during disman

• Early Pantex operations focused on assembly • Majority of dismantlement work occurred aft

• W28 dismantlement operations from 198

had the highest potential for uranium intexposure 

• Supported by observed contamination levels

documented interviews, and site expert discu
• De leted uranium metal in the W28 was not allo 

Reasons Why the W-28 Campa

Bounds Uranium Intakes

• W28 series weapons were stockpiled up to 30 ye

which maximized the potential for age related o

• Corrosion of uranium is a function of composition

temperature, and humidity 

• Depleted uranium metal in the W28 was not allo

p 

encased (alloying of uranium inhibits corrosion)

• W28 had one of the largest uranium surface are

weapons, hence more metal was exposed to corenvironments 

• Disassembly operations far exceeded those cond

previous years 
pe o

Bounding Uranium Intakes-co

• Approximately 300 uranium urinalyses co

from weapon assembly and disassembly at Pantex shortly after the campaign ende

• Samples can be used to bound the maximum 

intakes that could have occurred over the 6-y

period 

• The 95th percentile uranium intake value 

distribution of measured urine samples bpotential intakes for all assembly and disassembly operations at Pantex 
supports that the chronic 95 percentile 

In Vivo results from the worker populatio

Uranium Intake Plausibility

• The uranium intakes proposed by NIOSH 

bounding under plausible circumstances 

• For type S material this results in a daily intak

pCi (~30 U dpm/m

3) 

• In Vivo results from the worker populatio

supports that the chronic 95 th percentile intakes proposed by NIOSH are bounding 

• NIOSH airborne levels are consistent with 

empirically derived values from similar operations involving uranium 
Summary

• NIOSH has developed a scientific, quantit

methodology to bound potential uranium incurred by Pantex assembly and disassemworkers
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-30571

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARMARCION HENDERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

No. 5:09-CR-111-1

ON REMAND FROM

THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

May 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 10-30571 Document: 00512246020 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/17/2013
No. 11-60272

Before SMITH, SOUTHWICK, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This court affirmed the judgment of sentence. United States v. Henderson,

646 F.3d 223 (5th Cir. 2011). The Supreme Court reversed and remanded. Henderson v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 1121 (2013).

On remand, we directed the parties to file letter briefs stating what action

this court should take on remand. Both the government and the defendant

request that we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. We therefore

VACATE the judgment of sentence and REMAND for resentencing. We express

no view on what decisions the district court should make on remand.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

2

 Case: 10-30571 Document: 00512246020 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/17/2013
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 13 (Friday, January 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3471-3472]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-160]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Human Genome Research Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice

[[Page 3472]]

is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Initial Review Group, Genome Research Review Committee.
    Date: March 6, 2008.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: NIH/NHGRI Twinbrook Conference Room, 5635 Fisher's Lane, 
Suite 4076, MSC 9306, Bethesda, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Rudy Pozzatti, PhD., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Human Genome Research 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
402-0838.

    Name of Committee: National Human Genome Research Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, SEP ZHG1 HGR-P (M1).
    Date: March 7, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hilton Washington/Rockville, Double Tree Name Changed, 
1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Rudy O. Pozzatti, PhD., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Human Genome Research 
Institute, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4076, MSC 9306, Rockville, MD 
20852, (301) 402-0838, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1a1beababb0a5a5a391bcb0b8bdffbfb8b9ffb6bea7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="70001f0a0a11040402301d11191c5e1e19185e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human 
Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: January 11, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-160 Filed 1-17-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5783 

AN ACT 

To provide a safe harbor for financial institutions that maintain a customer account at the request of a Federal 

or State law enforcement agency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5783 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cooperate with Law 

3 Enforcement Agencies and Watch Act of 2018’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SAFE HARBOR WITH RESPECT TO KEEP OPEN LET5 TERS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 53 of 

7 title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 

9 ‘‘§ 5333. Safe harbor with respect to keep open letters 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—With respect to a customer ac11 count of a financial institution, if a Federal, State, Tribal, 

12 or local law enforcement agency requests, in writing, the 

13 financial institution to keep such account open— 

14 ‘‘(1) the financial institution shall not be liable 

15 under this subchapter for maintaining such account 

16 consistent with the parameters of the request; and 

17 ‘‘(2) no Federal or State department or agency 

18 may take any adverse supervisory action under this 

19 subchapter with respect to the financial institution 

20 for maintaining such account consistent with the pa21 rameters of the request. 

22 ‘‘(b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec23 tion may be construed— 

24 ‘‘(1) from preventing a Federal or State depart25 ment or agency from verifying the validity of a writ26 ten request described under subsection (a) with the 
3 

•HR 5783 EH

1 Federal, State, Tribal, or local law enforcement 

2 agency making the written request; or 

3 ‘‘(2) to relieve a financial institution from com4 plying with any reporting requirements, including 

5 the reporting of suspicious transactions under sec6 tion 5318(g). 

7 ‘‘(c) LETTER TERMINATION DATE.—For purposes of 

8 this section, any written request described under sub9 section (a) shall include a termination date after which 

10 such request shall no longer apply.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

12 for chapter 53 of title 31, United States Code, is amended 

13 by inserting after the item relating to section 5332 the 

14 following: 

‘‘5333. Safe harbor with respect to keep open letters.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5783 

AN ACT 

To provide a safe harbor for financial institutions 

of a Federal or State law enforcement agency. that maintain a customer account at the request
Exhibit 3.3.1 

**AMENDMENT**

**to the**

**BYLAWS**

**of**

**SYNTROLEUM CORPORATION**

Incorporated under the Laws of the State of Delaware 

Section 3.12. Emeritus Directors. The Board of Directors may, from time to time, by majority vote, elect one or more of its former directorsto serve as Emeritus Directors for one or more consecutive one-year terms or until earlier resignation or removal by a majority of the Board of Directors. Emeritus Directors may be asked to serve as consultants to the Board of Directors and may beappointed by the Board of Directors to serve as consultants to committees of the Board of Directors. Emeritus Directors may be invited to attend meetings of the Board of Directors or any committee of the Board of Directors for which they have beenappointed to serve as consultants. Emeritus Directors shall not be permitted to vote on matters brought before the Board of Directors or any committee thereof and shall not be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum of the Board orDirectors or the committee is present. Emeritus Directors will be entitled to receive reimbursement for expenses of meeting attendance, fees or other compensation, as approved by the Board of Directors. Emeritus Directors may be removed at any timeby the Board of Directors. An Emeritus Director shall not have any of the responsibilities or liabilities of a director, nor any of a director’s rights, powers or privileges. Reference in the Certificate of Incorporation and these Bylaws to“directors” shall not mean or include Emeritus Directors; provided, however, that references to “directors” in (A) Article IX of the Certificate of Incorporation and Section 6.7 of these Bylaws relating toindemnification of directors and (B) Article X of the Certificate of Incorporation relating to the limitation of liability of directors shall mean and include Emeritus Directors.
Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

TBD 6000 Work Group Teleconference

November 3, 2015

Conference Phone: 1-866-659-0537; Participant Code: 9933701#

AGENDA

1:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll call

1. NIOSH July 10, 2015 Responses to SC&A Review of Appendix BB, Rev 01

2. SC&A September 11 Review of NIOSH July 10 Responses

3. Public comments

4. Review of GSI issues matrix

5. Path forward/Plans for November Board meeting 

Adjourn
TONY SCOTT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1898

_____________ ________________/

Opinion filed July 8, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Ross Goodman , Judge

.

Tony Scott , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jillian H. Reding, Assistant Attorney

General, Ta llahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, THOMAS, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SolarWinds, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin B. Thompson, as
Principal Executive Officer of SolarWinds, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SolarWinds, Inc.



|                  |  |     |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kevin B. Thompson                
|                  |  |     |  | Kevin B. Thompson                    
|                  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SolarWinds, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Berry, as
Principal Financial Officer of SolarWinds, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SolarWinds, Inc.



|                  |  |     |  |                                                  
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael J. Berry                             
|                  |  |     |  | Michael J. Berry                                 
|                  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three-month period ending June 30, 2010, of Secure Window Blinds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Anthony Pizzacalla, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








/s/ Anthony Pizzacalla


Anthony Pizzacalla


President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,


Principal Financial Officer and Director








Date:  March 3, 2011
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of National Healthcare Technology, Inc. on
Form 10-KSB/A for the period from January 27, 2005 (Inception) through December
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


                              /s/ JON CARLSON
                              ---------------------------
                              Jon Carlson
                              CEO, CFO

                              Dated: February 20, 2007

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.