alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5882 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5882

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to provide for the 
 termination by a spouse of a lessee of certain leases when the lessee 
                    dies while in military service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gold Star Spouses Leasing Relief 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF LEASES OF PREMISES OF DECEASED SERVICEMEMBERS 
              WHO DIE WHILE IN MILITARY SERVICE.

    Section 305(a) of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 
3955) is amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ``by Lessee'';
            (2) in the heading for paragraph (1), by striking ``In 
        general'' and inserting ``Termination by lessee''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Death of lessee.--The spouse of the lessee on a lease 
        described in subsection (b)(1) may terminate the lease during 
        the one-year period beginning on the date of the death of the 
        lessee, if the lessee dies while in military service or while 
        performing full-time National Guard duty, active Guard and 
        Reserve duty, or inactive-duty training (as such terms are 
        defined in section 101(d) of title 10, United States Code).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 24, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5882

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to provide for the 
 termination by a spouse of a lessee of certain leases when the lessee 
                    dies while in military service.
```
Enc.

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH. 

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D.

 Madison, Wisconsin

Josie Beach

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson

 Rexburg, Idaho

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa

Mark A. Griffon

 Salem, New Hampshire

David Kotelchuck, Ph.D. 

 New York, New York

Richard Lemen, Ph.D.

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D.

 Cincinnati, Ohio

Wanda I. Munn

 Richland, Washington

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D.

 College Station, Texas

David B. Richardson, Ph.D.

Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D.

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico

Loretta R. Valerio

 Santa Fe, New Mexico

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

May 6, 2013

The Honorable Kathleen Sebelius

Secretary 

Department of Health and Human Services

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Madam Secretary:

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has 

completed its evaluation of Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 00113 

concerning workers at Brookhaven National Laboratory, in Upton, New 

York, under the statutory requirements established by the Energy 

Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 and 

incorporated into 42 CFR Sec. 83.13. 

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has 

recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for:

“All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor 

agencies, and its contractors and subcontractors who worked at 

Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York, from 

January 1, 1994, to December 31, 2007.”

NIOSH found that it has access to adequate exposure monitoring and 

other information necessary to do individual dose reconstructions with 

sufficient accuracy for members of this group, and therefore a class 

covering this group should not be added to the SEC. The Board concurs 

with this determination.

Based on these considerations and the discussion at the March 12, 2013, 

Board meeting held in Augusta, Georgia, the Board recommends that this 

class not be added to the SEC.

Enclosed is the documentation from the Board meeting(s) where this SEC 

class was discussed. The documentation includes copies of the petition, 

the NIOSH review thereof, and related materials. If any of these items are 

unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly. 

Sincerely,

[Signature on File]

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

Chairman, ABRWH

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



I, James D. Constantine, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and



(2)  the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 14, 2004



/s/    JAMES D. CONSTANTINEJames D. Constantine Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard J. Lampen, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CDSI Holdings Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) [intentionally omitted]     (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     (d) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 31, 2006              /s/ Richard J. Lampen   Richard J. Lampen   President and Chief Executive Officer
SUFFICIENT ACCURACY

Jim Melius, Jim Neton
REGULATION

– Per 42 CFR § 83.13 (c)(1)(i), Radiation doses can be 

reconstructed with sufficient accuracy if NIOSH has 

established that it has access to sufficient information 

to estimate the maximum radiation dose, for every 

type of cancer for which radiation doses are 

reconstructed, that could have been incurred in 

plausible circumstances by any member of the class 

or if NIOSH has established that it has access to 

sufficient information to estimate the radiation doses 

of members of the class more precisely than an 

estimate of the maximum radiation dose. 


PRELIMINARY STEPS

REVIEW WORK PROCESS – SOURCES, 

POTENTIAL TYPES OF EXPOSURES

IDENTIFY EXPOSED POPULATIONS – WHO 

WAS EXPOSED, VARIABILITY

APPLY HIERARCHICAL REVIEW TO 

EXPOSED POPULATION(S)
PERSONAL MONITORING DATA

DEMONSTRATE THAT HIGHEST EXPOSED 

WORKERS WERE COVERED

EVERYONE MONITORED OR MONITORED 

GROUP INCLUDED HIGHEST EXPOSED

MONITORING METHOD MUST BE SOUND

COWORKER MODELS MUST BE 

INCLUSIVE AND ACCOUNT FOR 

STRATIFICATION
OTHER DATA

AIR MONITORING, SOURCE TERM, AND 

SURROGATE DATA ARE MORE 

PROBLEMATIC

NEED TO SHOW THAT MONITORING OR 

MODEL ACCOUNTS FOR THE HIGHEST 

EXPOSED BUT IS PLAUSIBLE (E.G., NOT 

UNREALISTICALLY HIGH)
CONSIDERATION OF EXPOSURE 

POTENTIAL

HOW MUCH ACCURACY IS SUFFICIENT?

FOR LOW EXPOSURE POTENTIAL – IS LESS 

ACCURACY SUFFICIENT? 

EXAMPLE – RESIDUAL PERIOD. 

PROBLEM WITH EVALUATING 

COWORKER MODELS FOR 

STRATIFICATION
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the

Science Issues Work Group

January 19, 2018 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

3:00 p.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll-call 

DISCUSSION

Initial discussion to organize a review of “Dose and Dose-Rate Effectiveness 

Factors for Low-LET Radiation for Application to NIOSH-IREP” by Trabalka et al.

(Oak Ridge Center for Risk Analysis Inc.) 

Adjourn
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         1024605
<NAME>                        New Generation Plastic, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                             1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-15-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           3,708
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,262
<PP&E>                                         443,929
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 607,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,337,984
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,843
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,730,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   607,191
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,473,218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (3,547,326)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (3,547,326)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,547,326)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.30)


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 27, 2020

No. 04-19-00793-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellant

v.

Tanya WALKER and Adrian Segovia,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI23121

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s unopposed first motion for an extension of time to file the appellant’s brief is 

granted. We order appellant to file its brief by February 11, 2020.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 27, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00793

- CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO

, Appellant

v.

Tanya WALKER and Adrian Segovia,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar Co unty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI23121

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s unopposed first motion for an ext ension of time to file the appellant’s brief is

granted. We order appellant to file its brief by February 11, 2020.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of January, 2020

.

___________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
207
gor statics

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH
4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46

Cincinnati, Obie 45226
(513) 333-0825

January 30, 2008
CHAIRMAN:
Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

eee ae The Honorable Michael O. Leavitt
Secretary of Health and Human Services
MEMBERS: Department of Health and Human Services
200 Independence Avenue, S.W.
Beac! i
"Richland, Washington Washington, DC 20201
Bradley P. Cl
Rexburg, persed Dear Mr. Secretary:
weenie One The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has
deriv AGattica evaluated SEC Petition-00099 concerning workers at the Combustion
Salem, New Hampshire Engineering facility in Windsor, Connecticut under the statutory
James E. Lockey, M.D. requirements established by EEOICPA and incorporated into 42 CFR Sec.
Cincinnati, Ohio 83.13 and 83.14. The Board respectfully recommends Special Exposure
7 Cohort (SEC) status be accorded to all Atomic Weapons Employees
“aitany, New York Pas (AWE) who worked at the Combustion Engineering site in Windsor,
Z Connecticut from January 1, 1965 through December 31, 1972 for a
fanda |. Munn 4 rY
Richland, Washington number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, or in
jonni kcxiga’ Sec combination with work days within the parameters established for one or
College Station, Texas more other classes of employees in the SEC. The Board notes that
Robert W. Presley although NIOSH found that they were unable to completely reconstruct
Clinton, Tennessee radiation doses for these employees, NIOSH believes that they are able to
Genevieve S. Rosesier, Ph.D. reconstruct external doses from medical exposures for workers at the
Elysian, Minnesota facility.
Philip Schofield This recommendation is based on the following factors:

Bosque Farm, New Mexico

e People working at the Combustion Engineering facility during this
time period worked on research and production activities related to

STAFF: 2
nuclear fuel and nuclear weapons production.

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY:

Lewis V. Wade, Ph.D e The NIOSH review of the available monitoring data as well as the

Washington, DC available source term and other information found that they lacked
adequate information necessary to conduct accurate individual dose
COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT : reconstructions for internal doses and external doses (other than
Zaida Burgos medical) at the Combustion Engineering facility during the time

Atlanta, Georgia period in question.


The Honorable Michael O. Leavitt January 30, 2008

e NIOSH determined that health may have been endangered for these Combustion
Engineering facility workers. The Board concurs with this determination.

Enclosed is supporting documentation from the recent Advisory Board Meeting held in Las Vegas,
Nevada where this class of the special exposure cohort was discussed. If any of these items are
unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly.

Sincerely,
Se nae.

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.
Chairman

Enc.
Exhibit 99.1

                                                             NEWS RELEASE
                                                                  Contact:
                                                                  Bea Slizewski
                                                                  585-264-3189


     PRO-FAC COOPERATIVE TO RESTATE FIRST QUARTER 2003 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Rochester, New York, January 30, 2003 -- Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc. (NASDAQ:
PFACP), an agricultural cooperative, reported today that subsequent to the
issuance of its financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended September 28,
2002, it determined that the previously reported gain on the transaction with
Agrilink Foods, Inc. and its share of the net losses of Agrilink Holdings LLC
had been determined incorrectly. The effect of the error was to overstate the
gain recognized on the transaction with Agrilink Foods, Inc. by $2.1 million and
to overstate its share of its losses of Agrilink Holdings LLC by $.2 million.
The total effect of the aforementioned items was to reduce net income for the
quarter by $1.9 million, with a corresponding reduction in Pro-Fac's investment
in Agrilink Holdings LLC. However, the impact of these adjustments do not impact
Pro-Fac's cash position.

To adjust for these items, Pro-Fac will restate its quarterly financial
information for its fiscal quarter ended September 28, 2002. The restated
financial statements are expected to be filed next week under cover of a Form
10-Q/A.

This press release contains predictions, estimates, and other "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of section 21E of the Exchange Act and section
27A of the Securities Act. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as of the date of this
press release. These risks include, but are not limited to, the impact of
weather on the volume and quality of raw products, the impact of strong
competition in the food industry, including competitive pricing, the impact of
changes in consumer demand and Pro-Fac's ability to service debt. Please refer
to Pro-Fac's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 29, 2002,
and the risk factors section of Pro-Fac Cooperative's prospectus dated October
26, 2001, as well as other reports and information filed by Pro-Fac with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, for more information on factors that could
cause actual results to differ.
                                      -30-
Exhibit
      32


Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of BNH Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nehemya Hesin, Chief
      Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:
              November 12, 2008
              
              /s/ Nehemya HesinNehemya HesinChief Executive and Financial Officer
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00442-CR

TERRY LYNN NUNN,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 264th District Court

Bell County, Texas

Trial Court No. 65,098

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Terry Lynn Nunn attempts to appeal from his conviction in a Bell County district 

court. By letter dated December 20, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified Nunn that the 

proceeding was subject to dismissal because this Court did not have jurisdiction of 

cases arising from Bell County. TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.201(k) 

(West Supp. 2012). Further, the notice of appeal appeared to be very untimely. TEX. R.

APP. P. 26.2(a)(1).
Nunn v. State Page 2

Nunn was further warned that the Court would dismiss the appeal unless, 

within 21 days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for 

continuing the appeal. Nunn filed a response but it does not show grounds for 

continuing the appeal. 

This appeal is dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 24, 2013

Do not publish

[CRPM]