alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued November 27, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 8
- 00 7 8 2
- CV

——————————— OSCAR LEE HARRISON , Appellant

V. CITYCHASE LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1 115051

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant , Oscar Lee Harrison , proceeding pro se , has failed to timely file his appellate brief

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38. 6 (a), (d), 38.8(a)(1)

. A fter th is Court’s September 13, 2018 Order had directed the county clerk to mail the clerk’s record to appellant, that Order was returned on October 16, 2018, marked : “RETURN TO2

SENDER[,] NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED[,] UNABLE TO FORWARD.” The Clerk of this Cour t’s November 2, 2018 notice and November 6, 2018 notice warned appellant that his appeal was subject to dismissal if he failed to timely f ile h is appellate brief or update his mailing address within 10 days of those notices.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.1(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3 (b), (c). A ppellant neither timely filed his brief nor provided the Clerk of this Court with a ny other address

. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 9.1(b) (“A party not represented by counsel must sign any document . . . and give the party’s mailing addr ess, telephone number, fax number, if any, and email address.”); 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(c). Accordingly, w e dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution for failure to timely file a brief

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c). PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley , Lloyd, and Caughey

.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 1 9

- 0 167

STATE OF MONTANA,
Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ALAN TODD RUFF
, Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and
good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension
of time to and including July 29 , 20 20 , within which to prepare, file,
and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 24 2020

06/24/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0167
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 22, 2012

t1015

Order 

October 22, 2012

145124

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145124

COA: 307697

Kent CC: 08-011617-FC

ELLIS MILLS, III,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 3, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 57 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 57

   To require the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to 
report to the Congress semiannually on the number of firearms transfers 
  resulting from the failure to complete a background check within 3 
business days, and the procedures followed after it is discovered that 
 a firearm transfer has been made to a transferee who is ineligible to 
                           receive a firearm.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 3, 2017

 Ms. Jackson Lee introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to 
report to the Congress semiannually on the number of firearms transfers 
  resulting from the failure to complete a background check within 3 
business days, and the procedures followed after it is discovered that 
 a firearm transfer has been made to a transferee who is ineligible to 
                           receive a firearm.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accidental Firearms Transfers 
Reporting Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. FBI REPORT ON FIREARMS TRANSFERS RESULTING FROM THE FAILURE TO 
              COMPLETE A BACKGROUND CHECK WITHIN 3 BUSINESS DAYS, AND 
              THE PROCEDURES FOLLOWED AFTER IT IS DISCOVERED THAT A 
              FIREARM TRANSFER HAS BEEN MADE TO A TRANSFEREE WHO IS 
              INELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE A FIREARM.

    Within 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and 
every 6 months thereafter, the Director of the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on the Judiciary of the 
Senate a written report on--
            (1) the number of proposed firearm transfers--
                    (A) about which a person licensed under chapter 44 
                of title 18, United States Code, contacted the national 
                instant criminal background check system established 
                under section 103 of the Brady Handgun Violence 
                Prevention Act;
                    (B) with respect to which the system failed to 
                respond to the licensee within 3 business days; and
                    (C) which were completed in the period covered by 
                the report; and
            (2) the procedures followed after it is discovered that a 
        firearm transfer has been made to a transferee who is 
        ineligible to receive a firearm.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7623** 

TEON JAMELL WILLIAMS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Frank D. Whitney , Chief District Judge. ( 5:16

- cv - 00061

- FDW )

Submitted : January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN , and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Teon Jamell Williams , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Teon Jamell Williams seeks to appeal the district co urt’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue abse nt “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the distri ct court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the 

Subcommittee on Dose Reconstruction Review (SDRR)

April 20, 2022 

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537, Participant Code: 9933701# 

11:00 a.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll-call 

DISCUSSION

– Blinds Review Cases from Set 30

Facilities that may be covered: Hanford 

– Discussion of changes in SDRR selection criteria based on 

SC&A document “Summary Dose Reconstruction Information” 3/18/22 (rev. 1) 

4:00 p.m. Adjourn
EXHIBIT 31.02



Certification of Robert M. Kline, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended



I, Robert M. Kline, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



November 12, 2009

/s/Robert M. Kline__________________

Robert M. Kline, Treasurer

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
#### Don V. STINSON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 76-2363.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 23, 1978.

Opinion After Reconsideration Dec. 7, 1978.

See 585 F.2d 748.

*378Don V. Stinson, pro se.

William J. Baxley, Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., Barry V. Hutner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Birmingham, Ala., for respondent-appellee.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORN-BERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.*

*

 Judges RUBIN and VANCE were not members of the court at the time of the submission of this case to the court en banc, and did not participate in the consideration of this decision.

PER CURIAM:

This case is remanded to the panel for consideration in light of *Galtieri v. Wainwright,*582 F.2d 348 (5th Cir. 1978), decided today by the court en banc.

THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge,

specially concurring:

I agree that this case should be remanded to the panel for consideration of the merits of petitioner’s claims. *See*my dissenting opinion in *Galtieri v. Wainwright,*582 F.2d at 366.

GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge,

dissenting:

For the reasons stated in my dissent in *Galtieri v. Wainwright*and *Matera v. Wainwright,*No. 75-4169 and 76-1006, 582 F.2d 366-367, decided today, I dissent.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 10.6

                          SCHEDULE TO FORM OF OPEN-END
                      MORTGAGE, ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS, LEASES
                                  AND SECURITY


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Mortgager                  Mortgager's               Real Property
                           Mailing Address           Location

<S>                        <C>                       <C>
Balanced Care at           164 Schiebel Road         164 Schiebel Road
Butler, Inc. d/b/a         Clearfield Township       Butler, PA  16001
Outlook Pointe             Butler, PA 16001          Clearfield Township
Keepsakes at Butler                                  Butler County


BCC at Darlington,         498 Lisbon Road           498 Lisbon Road
Inc. d/b/a Outlook         Darlington, PA 16115      Darlington, PA 16115
Pointe Commons at                                    Beaver County
South Beaver

Balanced Care at           120 Elliot Road           120 Elliot Road
Sarver, Inc. d/b/a         Sarver, PA  16055         Sarver, PA  16055
Outlook Pointe                                       Butler County
Commons at Sarver

Balanced Care at           Box 340, Route 1          Box 340, Route 1
Eyers Grove, Inc.          Millville, PA  17846      Eyersgrove
                                                     Millville, PA  17846
                                                     Butler County
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5784 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5784

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 2650 North Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Milwaukee, 
Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the ``Vel R. Phillips Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VEL R. PHILLIPS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2650 North Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Milwaukee, 
Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the ``Vel R. Phillips Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Vel R. 
Phillips Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5784

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
    at 2650 North Doctor Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Milwaukee, 
Wisconsin, shall be known and designated as the ``Vel R. Phillips Post 
                           Office Building''.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, as acting chief financial officer of GigOptix, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 5, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended April 5, 2009 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This certification has not been and
shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                   |  |                               
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------
|Date: May 20, 2009 |  | /S/ DAWN CASTERSON            
|                   |  | Dawn Casterson                
|                   |  | Acting Chief Financial Officer
----

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Signatures                   |   | Title                           |   | Date        |
|------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|-------------|
|                         |   |                            |   |        |
| /s/ James WinsorJames Winsor |   | Chief Executive OfficerDirector |   | May 4, 2011 |

----
**Exhibit 15**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-104171, 333-52016, 333-114797 and 333-142421 on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 27, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of CNH Global N.V. (which report expressesan unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption on January 1, 2007, of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in IncomeTaxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109* and the adoption as of December 31, 2006 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employer’s Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and OtherPostretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)*), and the effectiveness of CNH Global N.V.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for theyear ended December 31, 2008. 

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 

February 27, 2009
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2010 of
Flurida Group, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Flurida
      Group, Inc.Dated:
      12/02/2010
              By:
              /s/ Jianfeng
      DingJianfeng
      DingChief
      Executive Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Flurida Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Flurida Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,575
<SECURITIES>                                    74,846
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,986
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,474
<PP&E>                                          30,698
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,438
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 277,434
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,595
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           505
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,657
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   277,434
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               471,450
<CGS>                                          317,645
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  415,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,986
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,197
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,211
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,211
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71


</TABLE>