7526 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices 

1From August 21, 1994 through November 12, 

2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the 

President, through Executive Order 12924, which 

had been extended by successive Presidential 

Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3 

CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the 

Regulations in effect under the Internal Emergency 

Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706 (2000)) 

(IEEPA). On November 13, 2000, the Act was 

reauthorized by Pub. L. No. 106–508 (114 Stat. 2360 

(2000)) and remained in effect through August 20, 

2001. Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in 

lapse. Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 

CFR 2001 Comp 783 (2002)), which has been 

extended by successive Presidential Notices, the 

most recent of which was August 15, 2007 (72 FR 

46137 (August 16, 2007)), continues the Regulations 

in effect under IEEPA. 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession or control of any item subject 

to the Regulations that has been or will 

be exported from the United States to 

the Territory, including financing or 

other support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States to the Territory; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States to the Territory; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States to the Territory, and 

which is owned, possessed or controlled 

by the Denied Person or service any 

item, of whatever origin, that is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person if such service involves the use 

of any item subject to the Regulations 

that has been or will be exported from 

the United States to the Territory. For 

the purposes of this paragraph, service 

means installation, maintenance, repair, 

modification or testing. 

Fourth, after notice and opportunity 

for comment as provided in Section 

766.23 of the Regulations, any person, 

firm, corporation or business 

organization related to the Denied 

Person by affiliation, ownership, control 

or position of responsibility in the 

conduct or trade or related services may 

also be made subject to the provisions 

of this Order. 

Fifth, this Order does not prohibit any 

export, reexport, or other transaction 

subject to the Regulations where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of the U.S.- 

origin technology. 

Sixth, the Proposed Charging Letter, 

the Settlement Agreement and this 

Order shall be made available to the 

public, and a copy of this Order shall be 

served on the Denied Person and on 

BIS, and shall be published in the 

Federal Register. 

This Order, which constitutes the 

final agency action in this matter, is 

effective immediately. 

Entered this 14th day of January, 2008. 

Darryl W. Jackson, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 08–522 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Action Affecting Export Privileges: 

DMA Med-Chem Corporation; In the 

Matter of DMA Med-Chem Corporation, 

Case No. 02–10 

Order 

The Office of Antiboycott 

Compliance, Bureau of Industry and 

Security, U.S. Department of Commerce 

(‘‘BIS’’), having determined to initiate 

an administrative proceeding pursuant 

to Section 11(c) of the Export 

Administration Act of 1979, as amended 

(50 U.S.C. 2401–2420 (2000)) (the 

‘‘Act’’) 1 and the Export Administration 

Regulations (currently codified as 15 

CFR Parts 730–774 (2007)) (the 

‘‘Regulations’’), against DMA Med-Chem 

Corporation (‘‘DMA’’), a domestic 

concern, based on allegations set forth 

in the Proposed Charging Letter, dated 

April 17, 2006, that alleged that DMA 

committed one violation of the 

Regulations; 

Specifically, the charge is: 

1. One Violation of 15 CFR 760.2(d)—

Furnishing Information about Business 

Relationships with Boycotted Countries 

or Blacklisted Persons: During the year 

2001, DMA engaged in a transaction 

involving the sale and/or transfer of 

goods or services (including 

information) from the United States to 

Syria. In connection with these 

activities, on one occasion, DMA, with 

intent to comply with, further or 

support an unsanctioned foreign 

boycott, furnished information 

concerning its or another person’s 

business relationships with or in a 

boycotted country, an activity 

prohibited by Section 760.2(d) of the 

Regulations, and not excepted. 

BIS and DMA having entered into a 

Settlement Agreement pursuant to 

Section 766.18(a) of the Regulations 

whereby the parties have agreed to settle 

this matter in accordance with the terms 

and conditions set forth therein and the 

terms of the Settlement Agreement 

having been approved by me; 

It is therefore ordered that: 

First, a civil penalty of $2,400 is 

assessed against DMA. Payment shall be 

suspended for a period of two years 

from the date of entry of this Order and 

thereafter shall be waived, provided 

that, during the period of suspension, 

DMA has committed no violation of the 

Act and Regulations or any order issued 

thereunder. 

Second, for a period of two years from 

the date of entry of this Order, DMA 

Med-Chem Corporation (Great Neck, 

New York) (‘‘Denied Person’’) may not 

participate, directly or indirectly, in any 

way in any transaction involving any 

commodity, software or technology 

(collectively, ‘‘item’’) exported or to be 

exported from the United States to 

Bahrain, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, 

Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, the 

United Arab Emirates or the Republic of 

Yemen (collectively, the ‘‘Territory’’) 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity relating to the 

Territory that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document, relating to the 

Territory. 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, other otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States to the 

Territory that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

relating to the Territory subject to the 

Regulations; or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

to the Territory that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

relating to the Territory subject to the 

Regulations. 

Third, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations from the United States 

to the Territory; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 27 / Friday, February 8, 2008 / Notices 7527 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession or control of any item subject 

to the Regulations that has been or will 

be exported from the United States to 

the Territory, including financing or 

other support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States to the Territory; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the Untied States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States to the Territory; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States to the Territory, and 

which is owned, possessed or controlled 

by the Denied Person or service any 

item, of whatever origin, that is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person if such service involves the use 

of any item subject to the Regulations 

that has been or will be exported from 

the United States to the Territory. For 

purposes of this paragraph, service 

means installation, maintenance, repair, 

modification or testing. 

Fourth, after notice and opportunity 

for comment as provided in Section 

766.23 of the Regulations, any person, 

firm, corporation or business 

organization related to the Denied 

person by affiliation, ownership, control 

or position of responsibility in the 

conduct of trade or related services may 

also be made subject to the provisions 

of this Order. 

Fifth, this Order does not prohibit any 

export, reexport, or other transaction 

subject to the Regulations where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the regulations are the foreign-produced 

direct product of U.S.-origin technology. 

Sixth, the Proposed Charging Letter, 

the Settlement Agreement and this order 

shall be made available to the public, 

and a a copy of this Order shall be 

served on the Denied Person and on 

BIS, and shall be published in the 

Federal Register. 

This Order, which constitutes the 

final agency action in this matter, is 

effective immediately. 

Entered this 14th day of January, 2008. 

Darryl W. Jackson, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 08–521 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Materials Technical Advisory 

Committee; Notice of Partially Closed 

Meeting 

The Materials Technical Advisory 

Committee will meet on February 21, 

2008, 10 a.m., Herbert C. Hoover 

Building, Room 3884, 14th Street 

between Constitution & Pennsylvania 

Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The 

Committee advises the Office of the 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration with respect to technical 

questions that affect the level of export 

controls applicable to materials and 

related technology. 

Agenda 

Public Session 

1. Opening Remarks and Introduction. 

2. Report of Composite Working group 

and ECCN review subgroup. 

3. Change of date of Australia Group 

Plenary to mid April 2008. 

4. Export Control Directive issued by 

President George W. Bush on January 

22, 2008. 

5. Public comments from 

teleconference and physical attendees. 

6. Any other business. 

7. Comments from Teleconferences. 

Closed Session 

8. Discussion of matters determined to 

be exempt from the provisions relating 

to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. 

app. 2 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). 

The open session will be accessible 

via teleconference to 20 participants on 

a first come, first serve basis. To join the 

conference, submit inquiries to 

Ms. Yvette Springer at 

Yspringer@bis.doc.gov no later than 

February 14, 2008. 

A limited number of seats will be 

available during the public session of 

the meeting. Reservations are not 

accepted. To the extent time permits, 

members of the public may present oral 

statements to the Committee. Written 

statements may be submitted at any 

time before or after the meeting. 

However, to facilitate distribution of 

public presentation materials to 

Committee members, the materials 

should be forwarded prior to the 

meeting to Ms. Springer via e-mail. 

The Assistant Secretary for 

Administration, with the concurrence of 

the delegate of the General Counsel, 

formally determined on January 22, 

2008, pursuant to section 10(d) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 

amended, that the portion of the 

meeting dealing with matters the 

premature disclosure of which would 

likely frustrate the implementation of a 

proposed agency action as described in 

5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall be exempt 

from the provisions relating to public 

meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 

10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The remaining 

portions of the meeting will be open to 

the public. 

For more information, call Yvette 

Springer at (202) 482–2813. 

Dated: February 5, 2008. 

Yvette Springer, 

Committee Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. E8–2370 Filed 2–7–08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[FA–437–804, A–471–806, C–437–805] 

Sulfanilic Acid From Hungary and 

Portugal: Final Results of Sunset 

Reviews and Revocation of Orders 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On October 1, 2007, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published in the Federal 

Register the notice of initiation of the 

five-year sunset reviews of the 

antidumping duty orders on sulfanilic 

acid from Hungary and Portugal and the 

countervailing duty order on sulfanilic 

acid from Hungary, pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’). Because the 

domestic interested party has 

withdrawn its participation and 

substantive responses in these sunset 

reviews, the Department is revoking 

these antidumping and countervailing 

duty orders. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 8, 

2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Devta Ohri or Brandon Farlander, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3853 or 

(202) 482–0182, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 8, 2002, the Department 

issued antidumping duty orders on 

sulfanilic acid from Hungary and 

Portugal (67 FR 68100) and a 

countervailing duty order on sulfanilic 

acid from Hungary (67 FR 68101). On 

October 1, 2007, the Department 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES