alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.02



Certification of Robert M. Kline, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended



I, Robert M. Kline, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



October 29, 2008

/s/Robert M. Kline__________________

Robert M. Kline, Treasurer

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
Review of External Exposures of Administrative Workers -1- SC&A –June 4, 2013 

NOTICE: This report has been reviewed for Privacy Act information and has been cleared for distribution. 

However, this report is pre-decisional and has not been reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker 

Health for factual accuracy or applicability within the requirements of 42 CFR 82. 

MEMO 

TO: Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health Work Group on TBD-6000 

FROM: John Mauro and Robert Anigstein, SC&A 

SUBJECT: Review of NIOSH Approach to Estimating Doses to GSI Employees Not Routinely 

Working in Production Areas at GSI 

DATE: June 4, 2013 

In May 2013, David Allen transmitted a white paper providing details on the method NIOSH 

plans to use to reconstruct doses to GSI workers who were present at GSI during the radium era, 

but were not routinely present in the operational areas. The white paper was prepared in 

response to a request by the TBD-6000 Work Group during a work group meeting held on April 

26, 2013. This memo presents SC&A’s review of that white paper.

NIOSH has adopted a fundamental strategy that we believe is reasonable and claimant favorable 

for reconstructing external doses to GSI workers who were not directly involved in radiological 

operations during the radium era, but might have entered the radiological areas periodically as 

part of their responsibilities at GSI. The model assumes that such workers spent 25% of their 

time at the 2 mR/hr radiation protection boundary, and that these workers crossed that boundary 

once each shift. The assumptions used by NIOSH to estimate the annual doses associated with 

periodically visiting the operational areas are as follows: 

 3,250 hours per year working at GSI 

 30% load factor for radiography activities 

 25% of the time present at the 2 mR/hr boundary 

Based on these assumptions, NIOSH derived the following annual external dose to penetrating 

radiation: 

3,250 hrs/yr × 0.25 × 0.30 × 2 mR/hr = 487.5 mR/yr 

In addition to these exposures, NIOSH assumed that the worker crossed the 2 mR/hr boundary 

once per shift and received 0.206 mR/shift, or 84 mR/yr assuming 406.25 shifts per year. The 

total external dose is therefore estimated to be 487.5 + 84 = 571.5 mR/yr. 

SC&A agrees with these assumptions and the resulting annual doses for workers who were 

assigned administrative functions that did not require routine presence in operational areas 

during the radium era.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene NEDD, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 78-5226

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Oct. 26, 1978.

*966Frank M. Garza, Corpus Christi, Tex. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.

J. A. Canales, U. S. Atty., Anna E. Stool, George A. Kelt, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., Robert A. Berg, Asst. U. S. Atty., Corpus Christi, Tex., James R. Gough, Asst. U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before RONEY, GEE and FAY, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir.; *see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.*. *Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al.,*5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

Defendant, a previously convicted felon, was found guilty by the court of possession of a firearm which had been shipped in interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 922(h) and 924(a).

The district court denied a motion to suppress the firearm, the product of a search of defendant’s apartment. Although the search was made pursuant to a warrant, the firearm was not described in the search warrant, obtained to search for heroin. Although they had no success in finding heroin, the police found a pistol under a mattress while looking for heroin.

The officer who obtained the warrant knew that defendant was a convicted felon and had heard that he sometimes carried a pistol.

If the police knew of the firearm and its location and intended to seize it without describing it particularly in the warrant, a Fourth Amendment violation would have occurred. *Coolidge v. New Hampshire,*403 U.S. 443, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971).

The district court, however, found that police were searching for heroin, not a firearm. Neither of the policemen conducting the search knew that defendant actually possessed the firearm at the time the warrant was obtained or that it was located at the apartment. The firearm was not the object of the search. The findings of the district court are not clearly erroneous.

The pistol is admissible under the plain view doctrine when discovered in a place where the police could properly be looking in execution of the warrant. *United States v. Bills,*555 F.2d 1250, 1251 (5th Cir. 1977).

AFFIRMED.
Operational Guidelines
 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health
 

The Board has considered and has adopted the following official procedures: 

1. The Board shall implement the HHS/GSA definition of a quorum regarding the minimum 

number of members required to conduct a formal meeting (physical or teleconferenced) i.e., a 

quorum shall be comprised of one half the membership, plus one. Every reasonable effort shall 

be made to ensure all Board meetings are scheduled as to allow highest level of attendance by 

members. 

2. The Board shall issue formal recommendations on specific matters to HHS/NIOSH only after 

a majority opinion has been reached through voting by Aeligible members.@ Eligible members 

are defined as those whom; 

a) have not been required to recuse themselves from participating in discussions 

regarding the issue at hand, 

b) those who have not abstained from a specific vote or, 

c) those who may not be available to participate in a given vote. 

All reasonable efforts shall be made by NIOSH/OCAS to obtain the vote (or notification of 

recusal or abstention from a vote) from any member that may not be able to either be 

telephonically or physically present for that vote. 

3. The Board can form subcommittees and working groups, at the discretion of the Chair and 

Executive Secretary with the advice of the Board. This may include outside technical experts 

(consultants) to the extent permitted by HHS/CDC. The Department Committee Management 

Officer will be notified upon establishment of each subcommittee, and will be provided with its 

name, membership, functions, and estimated frequency of meetings; subcommittees fall under 

the same FACA guidelines as the full, or parent, committee. Working groups may be formed for 

a specific task or purpose. 

01/2002
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 4881]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-298]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, February 20, 
2008, 8 a.m. to February 21, 2008, 1 p.m., Courtyard Marriott, 2899 
Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202 which was published in the 
Federal Register on January 9, 2008, FR08-41.
    The panel name was changed from Patient Oriented and Career 
Enhancement Awards for Stem Cell Research to NHLBI-Patient Oriented 
Research (K23, 24, and 25's) Career Enhancement Awards. The rest of the 
information remains the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: January 18, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-298 Filed 1-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOSEPH SENTORE COLEMAN, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 573 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

VICTOR MANUEL CELORIO,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv79-SPM/GRJ

GOOGLE INC., 

AND JOHN DOES 1-3.

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge’s report

and recommendation (doc. 42) dated May 23, 2012. The parties were given an

opportunity to file objections. No objections were filed. 

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I find that the

report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The report and recommendation (doc. 42) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (doc. 23) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of June, 2012.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00079-RV-GRJ Document 43 Filed 06/26/12 Page 1 of 1
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 115

Teleconference Meeting

January 25, 2017 

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537 

Participant Code: 9933701 

11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) Start

• Roll-call – Mr. Katz, DFO

• Welcome – Dr. Melius, Chair

• November Board Meeting Final Vote Tallies – Mr. Katz, DFO

• Scheduling October Board teleconference: weeks of October 16, 23, or 30, 2017 - Mr. 

Katz, DFO

• Hooker Electrochemical Site Profile Review – Dr. Anderson, URAWE WG Chair

• Tasking SC&A reviews of recent NIOSH Procedure Updates – Mr. Katz, DFO

• Pantex SEC class expanded by HHS to include 1951-1957 – Dr. Neton, NIOSH

• Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition Status Update – Mr. Rutherford, DCAS

• Updates from Work Groups and Subcommittees (as necessary) – WG/SC Chairs

• Plans for the March 2017 Board Meeting – All Members

Adjourn
UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934

       Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): November 7, 2002

                            PRO-FAC COOPERATIVE, INC.
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)


<TABLE>
<S>                                            <C>                          <C>
                 New York                              0-20539                          16-6036816
------------------------------------------     --------------------------   ------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) (Commission File Number)         (IRS Employer Identification Number)
</TABLE>


                    90 Linden Oaks, Rochester, New York      14625
                 ---------------------------------------    -------
                 (Address of Principal Executive Offices)  (Zip Code)


        Registrant's Telephone Number Including Area Code: (585) 383-1850



<PAGE>



Item 4. Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant

On November 7, 2002, Pro-Fac Cooperative,  Inc. (the "Company") engaged Deloitte
& Touche LLP  ("Deloitte  & Touche") as its  independent  auditor for the fiscal
year ending June 28, 2003.

During fiscal years ending June 29, 2002 and June 30, 2001, and through the date
of the engagement of Deloitte & Touche,  the Company did not consult  Deloitte &
Touche with respect to the  application of accounting  principles to a specified
transaction,  either  completed or proposed,  or the type of audit  opinion that
might  be  rendered  on the  Company's  consolidated  financial  statements,  or
regarding any other matters or reportable  events  described  under Item 304 (a)
(2) (i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.



<PAGE>











                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                               PRO-FAC COOPERATIVE, INC.



Date:    November 8, 2002         By:   /s/        Stephen R. Wright
         ----------------               ----------------------------------------
                                                   STEPHEN R. WRIGHT
                                             GENERAL MANAGER AND SECRETARY
                                            (Principal Executive Officer and
                                               Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.02



Certifying Statement of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert M. Kline, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. and will be retained by Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





August 17, 2009

/s/Robert M. Kline__________________

Robert M. Kline, Treasurer

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 571 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 571

   To permit members of the House of Representatives to donate used 
     computer equipment to public elementary and secondary schools 
                       designated by the members.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2017

 Mr. Serrano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permit members of the House of Representatives to donate used 
     computer equipment to public elementary and secondary schools 
                       designated by the members.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO DONATE 
              USED COMPUTER EQUIPMENT TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

    (a) In General.--Section 104(a)(3) of the Legislative Branch 
Appropriations Act, 1987 (as incorporated by reference in section 
101(j) of Public Law 99-500 and Public Law 99-591) (2 U.S.C. 5540(3)) 
is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3)(A) At the request of a member of the House of 
        Representatives, in the case of equipment consisting of 
        computers and related peripheral tools previously used by the 
        member, the Clerk may donate the equipment to a public 
        elementary or secondary school (as defined in section 9101 of 
        the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
        7801)) without regard to whether the donation meets the 
        requirements of the second sentence of paragraph (2).
            ``(B) At the request of the member who previously used the 
        equipment, if the Clerk donates equipment under this paragraph, 
        the Clerk shall donate the equipment to a school designated by 
        the member.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect upon the expiration of the 120-day period which begins on 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1





SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION





I, John Jenkins certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Nasus Consulting, Inc.





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 
 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.








Date:  August 16, 2010
/s/ John JenkinsJohn JenkinsChief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 13 (Friday, January 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 3455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-195]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, February 22, 2008.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance matters.

Contact Person for more Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 08-195 Filed 1-16-08; 10:06 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P