alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1633-1634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-50]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.


[[Page 1634]]


    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel, Animal Resource.
    Date: February 11, 2008.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Wilbur C. Hadden, PhD., Health Science 
Administrator, National Institute On Aging, Gateway Building, Room 
2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#442c252020212a330429252d286a2a2d2c6a232b32"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="deb6bfbababbb0a99eb3bfb7b2f0b0b7b6f0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 3, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-50 Filed 1-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of International Development and Environmental Holdings (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: October 19, 2009/s/ Ronald HardestyRonald Hardesty, Interim CFO





October 19, 2009





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to International Development and Environmental Holdings and will be retained by International Development and Environmental Holdings and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2371

MIMMI KIFLE SHEWAGA, Petitioner,
versus JOHN ASHCROFT, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A78-610-711) Submitted: April 30, 2004 Decided: May 17, 2004 Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aragaw Mehari, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Norah Ascoli Schwartz, Senior Litigation Counsel, John S. Hogan, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).*The immigration judge and the BIA denied relief under the United Nations’ Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) in their respective decisions. However, as the Government correctly notes, Shewaga never applied for protection under CAT during her litigation below, nor does she raise any substantive claim on appeal. Accordingly, we consider only the denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Mimmi Kifle Shewaga, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s denial of her applications for asylum and withholding of removal. * On appeal, Shewaga raises challenges to the immigration judge’s determination that she failed to establish her eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence [s]he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the evidence of record and conclude that Shewaga fails to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant the relief that Shewaga seeks. Additionally, we uphold the immigration judge’s denial of Shewaga’s request for withholding of removal. The standard for withholding of removal is more stringent than that for granting asylum. Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999). To qualify for withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate- 3 - “a clear probability of persecution.” INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Because Shewaga fails to show that she is eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for withholding of removal. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5719 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5719

   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to revise certain 
  measures used under the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare 
       Providers and Systems survey relating to pain management.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2018

 Mrs. Black (for herself and Mr. O'Halleran) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to revise certain 
  measures used under the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare 
       Providers and Systems survey relating to pain management.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reduce Overprescribing Opioids in 
Treatment Act of 2018'' or the ``ROOT Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. REVISING MEASURES USED UNDER THE HOSPITAL CONSUMER ASSESSMENT 
              OF HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS AND SYSTEMS SURVEY RELATING TO 
              PAIN MANAGEMENT.

    Section 1886(b)(3)(B)(viii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395ww(b)(3)(B)(viii)) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new subclause:
    ``(XII) With respect to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of 
Healthcare Providers and Systems survey (or a successor survey), 
beginning not later than January 1, 2020, such survey may not include 
questions about communication by hospital staff with an individual 
about such individual's pain unless such questions take into account, 
as applicable, whether an individual experiencing pain was informed 
about risks associated with the use of opioids and about non-opioid 
alternatives for the treatment of pain.''.
                                 <all>
```
NIOSH Conformity Assessment

Interpretation Notice

NIOSH CA 2019-1013 

February 2019 

NIOSH labeling requirements for air-purifying and powered air-purifying 

respirators, effective March 1, 2019

Supersedes the July 19, 1995 Letter to All Respirator Manufacturers 
Document Number

NIOSH CA 2019-1013

Page 2 of 2

1 SUMMARY

NIOSH is revising the requirement for respirator labels for air-purifying and powered air-purifying

respirator configurations. Beginning March 1, 2019 NIOSH will no longer require applicants to 

provide separate full filter and cartridge labels, as stated in the July 19, 1995 Letter to All 

Respirator Manufacturers (question 38) and Standard Application Procedures. 

NIOSH is not changing the requirements for the full respirator label or the abbreviated filter and

cartridge labels.

2 AUTHORITY

Approval of Respiratory Protective Devices, 42 C.F.R, Part 84

3 REFERENCES

NIOSH LETTER TO ALL RESPIRATOR MANUFACTURERS dated July 19, 1995 included a question and 

answer format. Information about filter labels was included in question 38: Which label goes on the 

filter and which label goes on the filter box?

The letter stated, in response to question 38: This policy has not changed. An abbreviated label goes 

on each filter and the complete approval label goes on the outside of the box. However, if the label 

will not fit on the outside of the box in can be included as an insert inside the box. If the label is 

inserted, the box should say "NIOSH-approved - See Insert."

Standard Application Procedure for the Approval of Air-purifying Respirators and 

Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Air-Purifying Respirators Under 42 CFR 

Part 84, revised March 12, 2018, Section 6.1 Checklist item 26

Standard Application Procedure for the Approval of Powered Air-purifying Respirators 

and Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Powered Air-Purifying Respirators 

Under 42 CFR Part 84, revised March 12, 2018, Section 6.1 Checklist item 26

Subject: NIOSH labeling requirements for air-purifying and powered air-purifying 

respirators, effective March 1, 2019

Supersedes the July 19, 1995 Letter to All Respirator Manufacturers
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 6190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Initial Review Group, Research Centers in Minority Institutions and 
Institutional Development Award Review Committee. RCMI and C.O.B.R.E 
Type I/Parent Mtg.
    Date: March 25-26, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Linda C. Duffy, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., 1 Democracy Plaza, Rm. 
1082, MSC 4874, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874, (301) 435-0810, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85e1f0e3e3fcc5e8e4ece9abebecedabe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0b6f7e6d6d724b666a626725656263256c647d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 25, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-442 Filed 1-31-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6410

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TOMMY PABELLON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-97-487, CA-00-1392-6)

Submitted: August 3, 2001 Decided: August 21, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tommy Pabellon, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant

United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this Circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tommy Pabellon seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Pabellon, Nos. CR-97-487; CA00-1392-6 (D.S.C. filed Jan. 3, 2001; entered Jan. 4, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

0120 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139574 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139574 

 COA: 291391 

Washtenaw CC: 08-000456-FH 

RONALD ALLEN NICKERT, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., and HATHAWAY, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals 

for consideration as on leave granted.
Exhibit 10.12


 


Second Amendment to Employment Agreement


 


This Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement
(this “Second Amendment”) is entered into as of this 17st day of July 2013, by and between Yifat Zommer,
an individual residing at Rehovot, Israel (the “Executive”), and ORAMED Ltd., a company incorporated
under the laws of the State of Israel, with an address at Hi-Tech Park 2/5 Givat Ram, Jerusalem, Israel 91390 (the ”Company”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of April 19, 2009 (the “Original Agreement”),
which was amended on August 31st, 2009 (the "First Amendment" and together - the “Employment
Agreement”); and


 


WHEREAS, Company
and the Executive desire to amend some of terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Company and the Executive agree as follows:


 


1.            In Section 2.1(a) - Salary of the Original Agreement the following paragraph is hereby added:


 


As of July 1st, 2013, the Executive shall be
entitled to a gross monthly salary of NIS 31,460 (the “Salary”).



 







2.            Except for the changes and/or additions stated herein, all the other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain valid
and bind the parties without any change. In the case of a contradiction between the provisions of this Second Amendment and the
provisions of the Employment Agreement, the provisions of this Second Amendment shall prevail. Without limiting the generality
of the foregoing, the term “Agreement” as used in the Employment Agreement shall be deemed to be the Employment Agreement
as amended by this Amendment.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first written above.


  


	 	Oramed Ltd.
	 	 
	 	/s/ Nadav Kidron
	 	Nadav Kidron, CEO
	 	 
	 	/s/ Yifat Zommer
	 	Yifat Zommer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Report of Credex Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: May 9, 2011

By: /s/ Denise Leonardo
    _____________________

    Denise Leonardo
    President (CEO)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Credex Corporation and
will be retained by Credex Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5847 

To amend title IV–A of the Social Security Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2018 

Mr. CURBELO of Florida (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Nebraska) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title IV–A of the Social Security Act, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Family Re5 sources and Training Options Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING PROGRAM INTEGRITY THROUGH 

7 IMPROPER PAYMENTS REVIEW. 

8 Section 404 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 604) is amended by adding at the end the following: 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5847 IH

1 ‘‘(l) APPLICABILITY OF IMPROPER PAYMENTS

2 LAWS.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Improper Payments 

4 Information Act of 2002 and the Improper Pay5 ments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010 shall 

6 apply to a State in respect of the State program 

7 funded under this part in the same manner in which 

8 such Acts apply to a Federal agency. 

9 ‘‘(2) REGULATIONS.—Within 2 years after the 

10 date of the enactment of this subsection, the Sec11 retary shall prescribe regulations governing how a 

12 State reviews and reports improper payments under 

13 the State program funded under this part.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. SUPPORTING WORK THROUGH CAREER AND TECH15 NICAL EDUCATION. 

16 Section 407(d)(8) of the Social Security Act (42 

17 U.S.C. 607(d)(8)) is amended by striking ‘‘(not to exceed 

18 12 months with respect to any individual)’’ inserting ‘‘and 

19 career and technical education’’. 

20 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

21 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

22 on October 1, 2018. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5493 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from income 

discharge of medical indebtedness. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 12, 2018 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself and Mr. LARSON of Connecticut) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from income discharge of medical indebtedness. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Debt Tax Re5 lief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF DISCHARGE OF MEDICAL INDEBT7 EDNESS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 108 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5493 IH

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘or’’ in 

2 subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end 

3 of subparagraph (E) and inserting ‘‘, or’’ , and by 

4 adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

5 ‘‘(F) the indebtedness discharged is quali6 fied medical indebtedness.’’, and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub8 section: 

9 ‘‘(j) QUALIFIED MEDICAL INDEBTEDNESS.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this sec11 tion, the term ‘qualified medical indebtedness’ means 

12 indebtedness which was incurred by an individual 

13 for— 

14 ‘‘(A) diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treat15 ment, or prevention of disease of the taxpayer 

16 or the spouse or a dependent of the taxpayer, 

17 or for the purpose of affecting any structure or 

18 function of the body of the taxpayer or the 

19 spouse or a dependent of the taxpayer, 

20 ‘‘(B) for transportation primarily for and 

21 essential to medical care referred to in subpara22 graph (A), or 

23 ‘‘(C) for qualified long-term care services 

24 for the taxpayer or the spouse or a dependent 

25 of the taxpayer. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5493 IH

1 ‘‘(2) ADDITIONAL RULES.—Rules similar to the 

2 rules of paragraphs (2), (5), (8), (9), and (11) of 

3 section 213(d) shall apply for purposes of this sub4 section. 

5 ‘‘(3) TERMS USED IN SECTION 213.—For pur6 poses of this subsection, any term also used in sec7 tion 213(d)(1) shall have the same meaning as when 

8 used in such section.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall apply with respect to indebtedness dis11 charged after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS