DISCLAIMER: This is a working document provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 

technical support contractor, SC&A, for use in discussions with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and 

Health (NIOSH) and the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (ABRWH), including its Working Groups 

or Subcommittees. Documents produced by SC&A, such as memorandum, white paper, draft or working documents 

are not final NIOSH or ABRWH products or positions, unless specifically marked as such. This document prepared 

by SC&A represents its preliminary evaluation on technical issues.

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution.

MEMORANDUM

TO: INL/ANL-W Work Group 

FROM: SC&A, Inc.

DATE: February 25, 2019 

SUBJECT: Verification and Validation Proposal for the SEC-00238 83.14 Period at the 

Chemical Processing Plant (1975–1980) 

Introduction and Background

On July 20, 2017, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) released its 

evaluation report for Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition-00238, which covers the Chemical 

Processing Plant (CPP) at Idaho National Laboratory (INL) under the 83.14 process for the years 

1975–19801

 (NIOSH 2017). NIOSH presented its evaluation report for SEC-00238 to the 

INL/Argonne National Laboratory – West (ANL-W) Work Group on August 14, 2017, and to 

the full Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health on August 23, 2017. 

1 This memorandum refers to this SEC-00238 period as the “83.14 period.”

The proposed class definition is as follows (NIOSH 2017, page 1): 

All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor agencies, and their 

contractors and subcontractors who worked at the Idaho National Laboratory 

(INL) in Scoville, Idaho, and who were monitored for external radiation at the 

Idaho Chemical Processing Plant (CPP) (e.g., at least one film badge or TLD 

dosimeter from CPP) between January 1, 1975 and December 31, 1980 for a 

number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring solely under 

this employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters 

established for one or more other classes of employees in the Special Exposure 

Cohort. [Emphasis added.]

SEC-00238 shares an important similarity with the first portion of SEC-00219, which covers 

CPP for the period January 1963–February 1970. Namely, the class definition requires evidence 

of external monitoring at CPP to be considered part of the class. For SEC-00219, the 

INL/ANL-W Work Group voiced concerns that such an external monitoring requirement might 

inadvertently exclude workers from the SEC class if the dosimetry indexing system in place at 

INL did not correctly identify claimants with their appropriate external dosimetry records. Of 

particular import, concerns were raised over temporary badges, which were often a handwritten 

record that was not always migrated to INL’s dosimetry indexing system (for an example of a 

temporary badge record, refer to Figure 1 in the next section). Such handwritten records could 

 
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 2 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

pose a variety of potential issues, including name misspellings, name variations, use of 

nicknames, legibility issues, and/or human error in the actual coding of these temporary badges 

into the INL dosimetry indexing system. For SEC-00219, SC&A was tasked with developing 

and performing a verification and validation (V&V) study to assure that temporary badges were 

correctly associated with the appropriate energy employee (EE). 

The concerns expressed by the INL/ANL-W Work Group for SEC-00219 were also expressed 

for SEC-00238. Therefore, SC&A was tasked with performing a V&V study similar to the 

evaluation completed for SEC-00219 (SC&A 2019). In February 2018, SC&A produced its 

initial review of available external dosimetry records during the 83.14 period (SC&A 2018). 

Among the conclusions of that report was the finding that temporary badges available in the Site 

Research Database (SRDB) for review by SC&A were severely limited (SC&A 2018, Finding 2, 

page 19). Thus, development of a V&V study of those badges would not likely result in any 

meaningful conclusions. 

As a result, the INL/ANL-W Work Group tasked NIOSH, in conjunction with SC&A, to perform 

an onsite data capture at the INL records facility to ascertain if additional badges existed and to 

capture those badges so that a more comprehensive V&V proposal could be developed. This data 

capture occurred in September 2018, with the documents cleared and made available for use by 

SC&A in late November 2018. This memorandum presents SC&A’s initial review of those

captured temporary badges as well as SC&A’s V&V proposal for the 83.14 period. 

Overview and Characterization of Temporary Badges during the 83.14 Period 

Temporary badges were used at INL for workers who were not on a routine monitoring program 

for a given facility but entered the facility to perform a given task. Figure 1 shows an example of 

a temporary badge for CPP. One thing to note from Figure 1 is that a unique security number 

(known at INL as an “S#”) is included along with the EE’s name and employer. SC&A observed 

that S#s were included on nearly all temporary badges reviewed during the 83.14 period. This is 

in contrast to temporary badges that were reviewed for SEC-00219 (January 1963–February 

1970), which rarely included the S#. Inclusion of the S# during the 83.14 period partially 

mitigates some of the main concerns, such as name variations/misspellings, since the S# provides 

another identifier that can be used to correctly identify the badge with the appropriate EE. 
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 3 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

Figure 1. Example of a Temporary Badge at CPP from 1975 

As noted in the introduction of this memorandum, NIOSH and SC&A performed an onsite data 

capture during September 2018 to identify and capture temporary badges during the 83.14 

period. The captured badges were cleared and made available for review by late November 2018 

and are contained in 705 separate PDF files that generally contained approximately 160 pages on 

average. In order to assess whether any significant temporal gaps existed in the set of captured 

temporary badges, SC&A examined each file to get a rough count of the number of badges per 

month during the 83.14 period. The results of this rough tally are shown in Figure 2 (by month) 

and Figure 3 (by year). 

As seen in the figures, the approximate number of temporary badges issued by month varied 

from a minimum of 375 in August 1975 to a maximum of 1,336 in September of 1978. The 

average over all months was 674 temporary badges issued. Approximate month-to-month totals 

could vary by hundreds of issued badges per month with a maximum difference of 352 badges, 

which occurred between September and August 1978. The average difference in issued badges 

by month was approximately 100 badges. Although the number of issued badges can vary 

significantly, this could be explained by the startup of larger-scale construction and modification 

operations, which were often monitored by temporary badges rather than the routine badging 

system. The general trend by year (Figure 3) shows that the number of badges increased from 

1975 to 1978 and decreased in the subsequent two years. Based on this manual tabulation, 

SC&A does not believe there is compelling evidence of significant temporal gaps in the recently 

captured temporary badges. 

However, unlike the available documentation covering the SEC-00219 period (January 1963–

February 1970), no summary documents have yet been identified for the 83.14 period that 
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 4 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

provide the actual number of temporary badges that were documented to have been issued during 

each monthly badging cycle. Therefore, there is no currently feasible way to definitively evaluate 

the completeness of the set of captured temporary badges for the 83.14 period. 

Figure 2. Approximate Number of Temporary Badges Issued by Month (1975–1980) 

Figure 3. Approximate Total Number of Temporary Badges Issued by Year (1975–1980) 
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 5 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

Suggested Claims for New Records Requests and V&V Evaluation

Selection of claimants for this V&V study followed a similar method that was proposed for the 

SEC-00219 V&V evaluation as described in SC&A (2016) and SC&A (2017). Specifically, a set 

of claimants would be selected with known temporary badges during the period of interest. Once 

that subset of claimants was selected, a full set of dosimetry records would be requested from 

INL/U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to determine if those identified temporary badges were 

correctly being included in the EE’s monitoring file. In order to select an appropriate subset of 

claimants with known temporary badges, SC&A examined the claimant population for workers 

who fit two additional criteria:

1. The current dose reconstruction for the claimant derived a probability of causation that 

was less than 50%.

2. The covered illness for the claimant included at least one non-SEC cancer.

The purpose of the selection criteria is to identify cases that would eventually require a revised 

dose reconstruction regardless of the final SEC adjudication. Therefore, any requests for updated 

dosimetry records from INL/DOE would already be required in the future, and undue effort and 

resources would not be wasted in researching the records for these individuals. 

As of the writing of this memorandum, a total of 1,100 claims have covered employment during 

the 83.14 period. Of those claims, 407 (37%) fit the above two criteria and formed the pool of 

EEs for potential V&V selection. SC&A then randomly selected 240 of the 705 temporary badge 

PDF files for the 83.14 period described in the previous section. SC&A reviewed those files and

visually matched claimant names in the pool of potential V&V candidates to the captured 

temporary badges. Surprisingly, almost 50% of the 407 claimants in the potential V&V pool 

appear to have at least 1 temporary badge in the files reviewed.

2

2 It should be noted that since the matches are based solely on the EE names, there are likely several false positives 

included in this initial estimate.

SC&A then began the selection process to identify a group of 30 claimants for updated 

dosimetry requests. Initially, SC&A targeted claims that had significant covered employment 

under SEC-00219 but still less than 250 days. These claims were targeted, as they are 

representative of the worst-case example in which an EE could potentially be inadvertently left 

out of the SEC if the EE’s temporary badges were missed. Four claims fit this characteristic. For 

the remaining 26 of 30 claims, SC&A simply selected the claims with the most identified 

temporary badges. Once the 30 claimants for V&V review were selected, SC&A reviewed the 

remainder of the 705 temporary badge documents (465 in total) for additional matches. 

In total, SC&A identified 639 captured temporary badges with the subset of 30 claimants. Table 

1 describes all 30 claims suggested for new records requests and V&V evaluation. 

 
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 6 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

Table 1. Overview of Suggested Claims for V&V Evaluation

Case 

ID* 

Total # of 

Temporary 

Badges 

Identified by 

SC&A

Case Notes and Comments

1 45

• Name: 

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment: 

• Employer(s): Aerojet Nuclear Company (ANC)

• Other Comments: EE had several routine CPP badges both during and after the 

83.14 period. Computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) with the EE indicates 

the main job duties were to transport to 

different areas of the site.

2 18

• Name: 

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment: 

• Employer(s): Allied Chemical Corporation (ACC), Exxon Nuclear Idaho Company, 

Inc. (ENIC), Westinghouse Idaho Nuclear Corporation

• Other Comments: EE was routinely badged at CPP during the 83.14 period with no 

other work areas identified. CATI with the survivor does not contain any specific 

information about job duties.

3 9 

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): ANC, Edgerton, Germeshausen, and Grier (EG&G) 

• Other Comments: Current dosimetry records indicate the EE did not require 

radiation monitoring during the 83.14 period. CATI with the EE indicates work 

inside CPP for several hours a day but does not provide the exact time frame.

4 22

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Idaho Supreme

• Other Comments: EE was routinely badged at CPP with occasional badging at Test 

Area North (TAN). CATI with the EE notes there were contamination incidents in 

the EE’s work area, and on at least one occasion the EE had contamination detected 

as they were exiting CPP.

5 23

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): EG&G

• Other Comments: The EE only had one routine badge at CPP during the 83.14 

period; most other badging was associated with the Test Reactor Area (TRA) and 

Power Burst Facility (PBF). CATI with the EE indicates the main job duties 

included the electrical systems and equipment in the 

vicinity of radioactive material.
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 7 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

Case 

ID* 

Total # of 

Temporary 

Badges 

Identified by 

SC&A

Case Notes and Comments

6 78

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Don Reid Pest Control, Pest Control Services

• Other Comments: Current dosimetry records indicate the EE was not monitored 

externally until 1981. CATI with the EE indicates they were monitored externally at 

all times during employment.

7 4 

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): miscellaneous contractors

• Other Comments: The Location File Card (LFC) indicates assignment to CPP 

construction (CX) during the 83.14 period. CATI with the survivor does not mention 

CPP.

8 28

• Name:

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Arrington Construction Company, other miscellaneous contractors

• Other Comments: The EE had regular external dosimetry associated with CX, 

Material Test Reactor construction (MTX), and the Experimental Breeder Reactor II 

(EBR-II) during the 83.14 period. CATI with the survivor does not mention CPP.

9 13

• Name:

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): C&L Electric, Jones/Boecon

• Other Comments: Current dosimetry records indicate the EE was not monitored 

during the 83.14 period.

10 19

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Idaho Nuclear Corporation, ANC

• Other Comments: The EE was monitored externally at the Technical Support 

Facility (TSF), TAN, and the Auxiliary Reactor Area I (ARA-I). The CATI was 

declined by the claimant/survivor.

11 13

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Mountain Bell

• Other Comments: The EE was monitored externally at EBR-II during the 83.14 

period. The CATI with the EE notes that were 

sometimes utilized at CPP. The EE also notes an incident occurring at CPP where 

the EE entered an area they were not supposed to enter. Although the EE wore a 

“full protective suit that was taped...hood, gloves and shoe covers,” the EE was sent 

to Central Facilities Area (CFA) where provided a urine sample. The date of the 

incident was not provided.
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 8 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

Case 

ID* 

Total # of 

Temporary 

Badges 

Identified by 

SC&A

Case Notes and Comments

12 11

• Name: 

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment: 

• Employer(s): Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)

• Other Comments: The current monitoring record indicates the EE was only 

monitored in 1963. CATI with the claimant survivor did not mention CPP, nor did 

they have any knowledge of radiological conditions experienced by the EE.

13 38

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Biggers Construction Company, Morrison/Knudsen-Ferguson

Company

• Other Comments: The EE was externally badged routinely as part of 

operations at CPP (CX) and MTX. CATI with the EE mentions working in hot cells 

and high-radiation vaults but does not mention CPP specifically.

14# 13

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Morrison/Knudsen-Ferguson Company

• Other Comments: The EE had routine external dosimetry from CPP CX. All CATIs 

with the survivors were declined.

15 26

• Name:

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Morrison/Knudsen-Ferguson Company

• Other Comments: The EE had routine external dosimetry from CPP CX. The CATI 

with the EE describes several jobs involving high-radiation areas at CPP but does 

not provide specific dates.

16 7 

• Name:

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): ANC

• Other Comments: The EE was monitored routinely at PBF, EBR-II, and TRA during 

the 83.14 period. The CATI with the EE does not mention CPP specifically but 

describes their work as occurring in the “reactor building.”

17 23

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Morrison/Knudsen-Ferguson Company, Ormond Construction 

Company, Waters Building and Supply, Atlas Mechanical Inc., Bingham 

Mechanical and Metal Works Inc.

• Other Comments: The EE had routine external dosimetry from CPP CX. The CATI 

with the survivor did not mention CPP.
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 9 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

Case 

ID* 

Total # of 

Temporary 

Badges 

Identified by 

SC&A

Case Notes and Comments

18 22

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Eastern Idaho Technical College

• Other Comments: Current dosimetry records indicate the EE was not monitored 

during the 83.14 period. CATI with the EE states that they worked in almost every 

area of CPP. 

19 18

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): EG&G, ENIC

• Other Comments: Only annual summaries of external dosimetry results are provided 

during the 83.14 period. The LFC for the EE indicates assignment to CFA, TRA, 

and CPP. The CATI with the EE states that their job duties included modification of 

all facilities within the “Chem. Plant.” The EE also noted that they were evacuated 

from CPP due to a spill and not allowed back for a full week; however, the time

frame was not provided.

20 24

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Miscellaneous contractors

• Other Comments: The EE had routine external dosimetry from CPP CX. The CATI 

with the claimant survivor mentions CPP as a work location but does not provide a 

time frame or further information.

21 34

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph

• Other Comments: Current dosimetry files indicate that there were intermittent 

visitor badges at INL from and that no external dose was 

accrued. CATI with the EE indicates work performed at EBR, TRA, TAN, CPP, 

Storage Areas, Waste Processing Areas, and the Naval Reactor Facility but does not 

provide specific dates. The EE mentions an incident at CPP; however, it occurred 

outside the 83.14 period.

22 18

• Name: 

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment: 

• Employer(s): Ormond Construction Company, Atlas Mechanical Inc., 

Morrison/Knudsen-Ferguson Company

• Other Comments: The current dosimetry record for the EE only contains annual 

summaries. The CATI with the EE notes work in CPP, TRA, TAN, CFA, and 

“ABR2” (assumed by SC&A to mean EBR-II). Routine duties included 

.
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 10 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

Case 

ID* 

Total # of 

Temporary 

Badges 

Identified by 

SC&A

Case Notes and Comments

23 4 

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): EG&G

• Other Comments: The EE was routinely monitored at TAN during the 83.14 period. 

The CATI with the EE only discusses work that occurred at TAN.

24 59

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Arrington Construction Company, Bingham Mechanical & Metal 

Works Inc.

• Other Comments: The EE had routine external monitoring at TAN, TRA, EBR-II, 

and CX. The CATI with the claimant survivor does not mention CPP specifically but 

indicates the EE worked all over the INL site.

25 17

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): ANC, EG&G, ENIC, ACC

• Other Comments: The current dosimetry file for the EE contains visitor badges at 

EBR-II during the 83.14 period. The CATI with the claimant survivor notes that the 

EE primarily performed inspections at CPP.

26 10

• Name: 

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment: 

• Employer(s): ENIC

• Other Comments: CATI with the EE mentions an incident in CPP in 1978 that 

involved a criticality event. 

27 17

• Name:

• Job Title:

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): EG&G

• Other Comments: The LFC for the EE indicates assignment to TRA, ARA, and 

TAN. The EE also had routine external monitoring for these locations. In addition, 

the dosimetry file contains temporary badges for EBR-II. No CATI is available for 

this claimant.

28 9 

• Name: 

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment: 

• Employer(s): ANC, EG&G

• Other Comments: The CATI indicates that regular duties included of 

hot shops and glove boxes, hot waste areas, reactors, and burial grounds. The EE 

further stated that they worked in “all areas, especially Chemical Processing Plant 

(653, 609, 601).”
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 11 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

Case 

ID* 

Total # of 

Temporary 

Badges 

Identified by 

SC&A

Case Notes and Comments

29 14

• Name:

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): EG&G

• Other Comments: The EE’s LFC indicates assignment to TAN, PBF, and TRA. The 

EE’s dosimetry file also has numerous visitor badges for TRA, CPP, and Special 

Power Excursion Reactor Test. Three CATIs with the EE lists numerous facilities at 

INL but does not mention CPP.

30 3 

• Name:

• Job Title: 

• Relevant Covered Employment:

• Employer(s): Morrison/Knudsen-Ferguson Company

• Other Comments: The EE’s dosimetry file contains routine badges for EBR-II and 

CX. The CATI with the EE noted job assignments inside CPP, including 

.

* Case ID is an arbitrary designation that does not have any direct connection to the claimant. Attachment A 

provides the actual NIOSH/Office of Compensation Analysis and Support Claims Tracking System (NOCTS) 

claim numbers associated with each case ID designation for reference.

In addition to the suggested cases for new dosimetry requests shown in Table 1, SC&A has 

identified temporary badges for seven of the original cases from the SEC-00219 V&V evaluation

(SC&A 2019). These cases would not require new records requests and could be used to 

augment the 30 new cases suggested above. SC&A identified 105 temporary badges with the 

previously researched SEC-00219 V&V cases. If accepted by the INL//ANL-W Work Group, the 

combined V&V evaluation for the 83.14 period would involve a total of 37 claimants and 744 

individual badges. 

Summary Conclusions 

SC&A’s V&V proposal evaluation identified the following summary conclusions: 

• The overwhelming majority of reviewed temporary badges for the 83.14 period (1975–

1980) contain a unique security number for the worker. These unique identifiers provide 

another method to correctly identify the EE with the badge. Such identifiers were rarely 

observed for temporary badges during the previous SEC-00219 period V&V evaluation 

(January 1963–February 1970). 

• SC&A’s review and rough tally of recently captured temporary badges during the 83.14 

period did not identify any temporal gaps that directly indicate a significant portion of 

badges may be missing or unavailable during a given time period. 

• No documentation, in the form of dosimetry branch summary reports, is currently 

available that identifies how many temporary badges were issued during the 83.14 period. 
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 12 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

Therefore, a more definitive completeness analysis of the captured temporary badges is 

not currently feasible. 

• SC&A identified 200 claimants that appear to have been temporarily badged at CPP

based on a match in the name. This represents just under 50% of the claims that fit 

SC&A’s V&V pool criteria.

• SC&A recommends the 30 claims described in the previous section for updated 

dosimetry records requests from INL/DOE for the purpose of V&V evaluation. A total of 

639 temporary badges are associated with these 30 claims. 

• An additional seven claims (representing 105 temporary badges) were identified during 

the 83.14 period that were part of the previous SEC-00219 V&V evaluation (SC&A 

2019). These claims could be used to augment the 30 suggested claims for updated 

dosimetry requests and would not require any additional research from DOE/INL.

References

NIOSH 2017. SEC Petition Evaluation Report – Petition SEC-00238 – Idaho National 

Laboratory, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH. July 20, 

2017. 

SC&A 2016. Memorandum: Verification and Validation (V&V) Plan for Temporary Badges at 

CPP (1963–1970), SC&A, Inc., Vienna, VA. September 29, 2016. 

SC&A 2017. Memorandum: Update on Validation and Verification of INL CPP Temporary 

Badge Database – Expansion of Claimant Pool (1963–1970), SC&A, Inc., Arlington, VA. 

August 3, 2017. 

SC&A 2018. Review of External Dosimetry Records for the Chemical Processing Plant 83.14 

SEC Period (1975–1980), SCA-TR-2018-SEC002, Revision 0, SC&A, Inc., Arlington, VA. 

February 20, 2018. 

SC&A 2019. Verification and Validation of Temporary Badges at the Chemical Processing 

Plant (1963–1970), SCA-TR-2019-SEC-001, Revision 0, SC&A, Inc., Arlington, VA. 

February 25, 2019. 
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 13 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

Attachment A: NOCTS Claim Numbers Associated with 30 Cases Suggested for Updated 

Monitoring Records Requests 

Case ID NOCTS Claim #

1 [redacted]

2 [redacted]

3 [redacted]

4 [redacted]

5 [redacted]

6 [redacted]

7 [redacted]

8 [redacted]

9 [redacted]

10 [redacted]

11 [redacted]

12 [redacted]

13 [redacted]

14 [redacted]

15 [redacted]

16 [redacted]

17 [redacted]

18 [redacted]

19 [redacted]

20 [redacted]

21 [redacted]

22 [redacted]

23 [redacted]

24 [redacted]

25 [redacted]

26 [redacted]

27 [redacted]

28 [redacted]

29 [redacted]

30 [redacted]
Memo – CPP 83.14 V&V 14 SC&A – February 25, 2019

NOTICE: This document has been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the 

Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and has been cleared for distribution. 

Attachment B: NOCTS Claim Numbers Associated with 10 Relevant Claims Identified 

from Previous SEC-00219 V&V Evaluation (SC&A 2019) 

Case ID NOCTS Claim #

P [redacted]

Q [redacted]

B [redacted]

L [redacted]

S [redacted]

W [redacted]

X [redacted]

AA [redacted]

AD [redacted]

G [redacted]