alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of IX Energy Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven Hoffmann, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.





|                      |     |                                                                              
|--------------------- | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 19, 2009 | By: | /                                                                            
|                      |     | Steven Hoffmann
Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
PANTEX SEC PETITION REVIEW:

1951‐1958, 1984‐1991

Joseph E. Fitzgerald

SC&A Team

September 2012

Denver, Colorado
SC&A Recommendation: W‐28 DU Exposure

• SC&A found that 1990 urinalysis results from W‐28 disassemb

contamination event would not be necessarily bounding of al

worker exposure, as indicated in NIOSH’s ER for SEC petition 0

– No objective evidence available from air sampling, contamination surve– No approach presented to normalize operational differences over 32 yea– Reliance on purportedly strong contamination control program not back

DOE audit findings

– Exposures not necessarily confined to W‐28 handlers due to contaminat

• Advisory Board agreed and recommended SEC class for all Pa

workers for 1958‐1983 (meeting standard SEC criteria)

• Action was deferred on earlier (1951‐1957) and later (1984‐19

periods, pending further review by SC&A and NIOSH, respecti
SC&A Review, 1951‐1957

• Work group tasked SC&A with reviewing time period prior to 

handling at Pantex to ascertain any analogous exposure potendepleted uranium

• SC&A conducted classified documents review at DOE headqu

focused on earlier operations and systems containing DU

• SC&A conducted classified interviews with former Pantex wor

tenure to the early 1960s

• Some evidence of DU present after 1955, but no definitive inf

regarding exposure potential

• No evidence of gross contamination similar to W‐28; interview

not have recollections of 1955‐1957 period

• Further confirmation will require onsite research at Pantex
Background for SC&A Review, 1984‐1991

• Work Group deferred action for 1984‐1991 pending further N

assessment of whether 1989 bioassay data would be boundin

specific W‐28 “campaign” period

• 1984‐1989 represented peak years of W‐28 disassembly

• Interviewee from that period noted that 1989 contamination 

not the worst one; just one that finally garnered managemen

attention

• Bioassays for DU not routinely done until 1989 event; contam

control was lacking

• NIOSH claimed operations, exposure pathways, and controls 

more consistent and representative over 5 year campaign tha

previous years

• SC&A awaits results of NIOSH’s review to begin its detailed as
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated November 24, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-206742) of Smart Trust,
High 20 Dividend Strategy Trust, Series 12.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


November 24, 2015
EX-10.23



 Exhibit 10.23 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (“FIRST Amendment”) is made by and between the Regents of the University of New Mexico, a body corporate of the
State of New Mexico, as Landlord, and Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., as Tenant. 
 WHEREAS, in May 2013, Tenant entered into a Lease with
Landlord for space at 800 Bradbury Dr.SE known as Suite 108 (the “Lease”); and, 
 WHEREAS, Tenant desires, and Landlord agrees,
to Tenant’s First Option to Extend Initial Term and, 
 NOW THEREFORE, Tenant and Landlord mutually agree and covenant as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Landlord and Tenant agree to extend the Lease Term for six (6) months by exercising Tenant’s First Option to Extend Initial Term, pursuant to paragraph 3.02 of the Lease. The parties agree that the First
Option term shall be reduced from one (1) year to six (6) months to commence June 1, 2014 and expire on November 30, 2014. 

  

	 	2.	All capitalized terms used, but not defined, in this First Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Lease. 

  

	 	3.	Except as amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Lease shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this First Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. 

 

					
	LANDLORD:    The Regents of the University of New Mexico
		
		 	




		 	By:	 	David W. Harris
		 	Its:	 	EVP for Administration, COO & CFO
		
		 	




		 	By:	 	Bruce Cherrin
		 	Its:	 	Chief Procurement Officer
	
	TENANT:    Exagen Diagnostics, Inc.,
		
		 	




		 	By:	 	Wendy Swedick
		 	Its:	 	Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operations Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                             YEAR         YEAR         YEAR
                                            ENDED        ENDED        ENDED
                                         DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31, DECEMBER 31,
                                             1996         1995         1994
                                         ------------ ------------ ------------
                                                 (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                      <C>          <C>          <C>
Net Income (Loss):
  Net Income (Loss).....................  $   4,967    $     592     $(1,252)
  Redeemable Preferred
  Stock Dividends.......................          0            0           0
                                          ---------    ---------     -------
                                          $   4,967    $     592     $(1,252)
                                          ---------    ---------     -------
Weighted Average number of Shares:
  Average common shares outstanding.....  4,638,926    1,300,863     496,873
  Common share equivalents resulting
   from assumed exercise of stock
   options..............................      8,142            0           0
                                          ---------    ---------     -------
                                          4,647,068    1,300,863     496,873
Earnings (Loss) per common share........  $    1.07    $    0.46     $ (2.52)
</TABLE>
Exhibit
32

PARADISE
MUSIC & ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Paradise Music & Entertainment, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB/Afor the period ending December
31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard P. Rifenburgh, the Chairman of the
Board (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer), hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|               |  | /s/ Richard P. Rifenburgh    
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------
|               |  | Richard P. Rifenburgh        
|               |  | Chairman of the Board        
|               |  | (Principal Executive Officer,
|               |  | Principal Financial Officer, 
|               |  | Principal Accounting Officer)
|               |  |                              
|Date:8/27/2009 |  |
EXHIBIT 32.2




Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002







In connection with the accompanying Form 10-K of ZAP for the year ended December 31, 2009, William Hartman, Chief Financial Officer of ZAP, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:




(1)           such Form 10-K of ZAP for the year ended December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange of 1934; and




(2)           the information contained in such Form 10-K of ZAP for the year ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ZAP .


Date:  November 12, 2010
By:
/s/ William HartmanWilliam HartmanChief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ADRIAN JAMES WOOD,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 5:10cv200/RS/EMT

WALT McNEIL,

Respondent.

______________________________/

O R D E R

Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc.

1). The filing fee has been paid.

The court notes that Petitioner failed to file his petition on the court-approved forms for use

in section 2254 cases. Local Rule 5.1(J) for the Northern District of Florida states that the court will

not accept for consideration an application for writ of habeas corpus under section 2254 unless the

appropriate petition form is properly completed and filed. Thus, Petitioner must file an amended

petition on the form for use in section 2254 cases. Petitioner is advised that the amended petition

must contain all of his allegations, and it should not in any way refer to the original pleading. The

amended petition completely replaces all previous petitions; when an amended petition is filed, all

earlier petitions are disregarded. Local Rule 15.1, Northern District of Florida. 

Additionally, Petitioner must submit a complete copy for each named Respondent and for

the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Therefore, Petitioner must submit two (2) complete

copies of the amended petition.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk shall send Petitioner a copy of the form for use in Section 2254 cases. This

case number should be written on the form. 
Page 2 of 2

2. Petitioner shall have THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order

in which to file an amended habeas petition, which shall be typed or clearly written, submitted on

the court form, and marked “Amended Petition.” Additionally, Petitioner shall provide two (2)

service copies of the amended petition.

3. Petitioner’s failure to submit the amended petition and service copies within

THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order may result in a recommendation that

this case be dismissed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of July 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No.: 5:10cv200/RS/EMT
EXHIBIT 31.1  Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification  I, Ronald Mumford, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 of Pacific Edge Publishing, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e) and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions after the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  May 13, 2008          By: /s/ Ronald Mumford Ronald Mumford, President, Principal Executive Officer and Director
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1256 CA 11-02245 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP TAYLOR, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
ANDREA W. EVANS, CHAIRWOMAN, NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH RENE NOWOTARSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARLENE O. TUCZINSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark H. Dadd, A.J.), entered July 14, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment denied the petition. It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot ( see Matter of Ansari v Travis , 9 AD3d 901, lv denied 3 NY3d 610)

.

Entered: November 9, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Presidential Documents 31925 

Proclamation 8266 of May 30, 2008 

Italian Independence Day, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On Italian Independence Day, we recognize our friendship with the nation 

of Italy, and we celebrate the generations of Italian Americans who have 

made significant contributions to our national character. 

June 2, 1946, marks the birth of the Italian Republic, the long-awaited 

triumph of liberty and democracy in an ancient land. Today, Italy is a 

friend of the United States and an ally of freedom and peace. Italians 

and Americans join together on Italian Independence Day to commemorate 

Italy’s independence and celebrate its rich history. 

The people of our two countries share special ties rooted in history, friendship, and family. Millions of American citizens have Italian ancestry, and 

they and their forebears have helped shape our way of life. Americans 

are grateful for the many contributions Italians and Italian Americans have 

made to our history and our culture, and we are proud that our nations 

are allies in the cause of peace and security around the world. 

In celebrating Italian Independence Day, we commemorate the freedoms 

our countries hold dear, and we honor the generations of Italian Americans 

who came to our shores seeking opportunity. They have helped to shape 

our great Nation and influenced American life for the better. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2, 2008, as Italian 

Independence Day. I call upon all Americans to observe this day by celebrating the contributions of Italians and Italian Americans to our Nation. 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES2
31926 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day 

of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 08–1324 

Filed 6–3–08; 8:59 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES2GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT 23.1

GOLF TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No. 333-46657, No. 333-39628 and No. 333-46659 on
Form S-8 and Registration Statements No. 333-56251, No. 333-39624 and No. 333-39622 on Form S-3 of our
reports dated March 22, 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golf Trust of America, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001. Our report
contains an explanatory paragraph regarding a change in accounting principal from a going-concern basis to a liquidation basis.

|Charlotte, North Carolina |  | BDO Seidman, LLP
|------------------------- |  | ----------------
|March 28, 2001            |  |                 

---

QuickLinks
|   | (1) | The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: August 12, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Joshua Bleak                                     |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   | Joshua Bleak                                         |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2006-25943; Airspace Docket No. 06-ACE-13]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Phillipsburg, KS.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0901 UTC, May 10, 2007.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Grant Nichols, System Support, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106;                         *telephone:*                         (816) 329-2522.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 18, 2007 (72 FR 2181). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on May 10, 2007. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

Issued in Forth Worth, Texas on February 16, 2007.

Walter Tweedy,

Manager, System Support Group, ATO Central Service Area.

[FR Doc. 07-902  Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M