alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5729 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5729

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
 To restrict the department in which the Coast Guard is operating from 
    implementing any rule requiring the use of biometric readers for 
   biometric transportation security cards until after submission to 
  Congress of the results of an assessment of the effectiveness of the 
                  transportation security card program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Transportation Worker Identification 
Credential Accountability Act of 2018''.
SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF TRANSPORTATION WORKER 
IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIAL BIOMETRIC READER RULE.
    The department in which the Coast Guard is operating may not 
implement the rule entitled ``Transportation Worker Identification 
Credential (TWIC)-Reader Requirements'' (81 Fed. Reg. 57651), and may 
not propose or issue a notice of proposed rulemaking for any revision 
to such rule except to extend its effective date, or for any other rule 
requiring the use of biometric readers for biometric transportation 
security cards under section 70105(k)(3) of title 46, United States 
Code, before the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date of the 
submission under paragraph (5) of section 1(b) of Public Law 114-278 
(130 Stat. 1411 to 1412) of the results of the assessment required by 
that section.
SEC. 3. PROGRESS UPDATES.
    Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
and every 90 days thereafter until the submission under paragraph (5) 
of section 1(b) of Public Law 114-278 (130 Stat. 1411 et seq.) of the 
results of the assessment required by that section, the Secretary of 
Homeland Security shall report to the Committee on Homeland Security 
and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation of the Senate regarding the implementation of that 
section.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### STATE v. COLTRANE

No. 459PA82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 210.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 21 September 1982.
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2009 of Auburn Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rachel
A. Haines, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
              
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
              
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




The
foregoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability
under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act
except to the extent this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.


Date:
      May 14, 2009
                  /s/
      Rachel A. HainesName:  Rachel
      A. HainesTitle:    Principal
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 131 

Teleconference Meeting 

October 16, 2019 

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537 

Participant Code: 9933701 

11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) Start 

• Roll-call – Mr. Katz, DFO 

• Welcome – POTUS Chair Designee 

• Recording August 2019 Meeting Absentee Votes – Mr. Katz, DFO 

• Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition Status Update – Mr. Rutherford, DCAS 

• Updates from Work Groups and Subcommittees (as necessary) – WG/SC Chairs 

• Plans for the December 2019 Board Meeting – All Members 

Adjourn
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PERRY GENE VANDERFORD,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv117/RV/EMT

WALTER A. McNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On March 10, 2011, this court

entered an order giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to pay the filing fee or submit a complete

motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 3). Plaintiff failed to respond to the order; therefore, on

April 19, 2011, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty-one (21)

days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc.

4). The time for compliance with the show cause order has now elapsed, and Plaintiff has not paid

the filing fee or submitted a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 16th day of May 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00117-RV-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/16/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:11cv117/RV/EMT

Case 3:11-cv-00117-RV-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/16/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.3 Description of Infoblox Fiscal Year 2015 World Wide Sales Compensation Plan






Description of Infoblox Fiscal Year 2015 World Wide Sales Compensation Plan


In September 2014, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Infoblox Inc. (the “Company”) approved the Infoblox Fiscal Year 2015 World Wide Sales Compensation Plan (“Commission Plan”). In addition, the Committee also approved target bonus amount for Christopher Andrews, the Company's Executive Vice President, Worldwide Operations of $300,000. Of this target bonus amount, Mr. Andrews is eligible to earn an annual bonus targeted at $60,000 based on achievement of Company business objectives under the Infoblox Fiscal Year 2015 Bonus Plan and the remainder of his targeted bonus amount shall be earned under the Commission Plan. 


The Commission Plan is designed to reward sales personnel for attainment of quarterly sales goals that are established by the Committee each quarter. Under the Commission Plan, Mr. Andrews will be eligible to receive up to four quarterly bonuses, each targeted at an amount equal to $60,000, in each case based on attainment of the quarterly total net revenue goals, with no maximum cap on the amount of bonus that could be earned. Actual quarterly awards are payable at amounts equal to the on-target bonus amount for the quarter multiplied by a percentage, which may be less than or more than 100%, that is obtained by dividing the actual amount of revenue for the quarter by the revenue goal for that quarter. Subject to the foregoing constraint, for the first two months of each quarter, Mr. Andrews will receive monthly advances against the amount payable for that quarter under the Commission Plan based on revenue recognized through the end of the applicable month. Under the Commission Plan, Mr. Andrews is also eligible to receive an additional award for any quarter in which the actual amount of revenue for the quarter exceeded the related goal for the quarter equal to the product of the on-target bonus amount for the quarter multiplied by four times the number of whole and fractional percentage points representing achievement in excess of the goal for that quarter. The Commission Plan does not contain a minimum achievement threshold requirement.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1469

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Markeith Deshun Thomas

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: August 2, 2016

Filed: August 8, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Markeith Deshun Thomas directly appeals the sentence imposed by the district

court1

 after he pled guilty to possessing and selling stolen firearms in violation of 18

1

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.
U.S.C. §§ 922(j) and 924(a)(2). His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief

under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, this court dismisses the appeal. 

Thomas’s appeal waiver should be enforced and prevents consideration of his

claim. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review

of validity and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886,

889-90 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (court should enforce appeal waiver and dismiss

appeal where it falls within scope of waiver, plea agreement and waiver were entered

into knowingly and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice would result). An

independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), reveals

no non-frivolous issues for appeal.

The appeal is dismissed and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

-2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer                           ( print page 4881)                        Advisory Board, February 5, 2008, 8:30 a.m. to February 6, 2008, 12 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 31, 2007, 72 FR 74318.                

This notice is amended to change the starting time on February 5, 2008 to 8 a.m. This notice is amended to add the NCAB Subcommittee on Planning and Budget meeting on February 4, 2008 from 6 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. and the Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Communications meeting on February 4, 2008 from 7:30 p.m. to 9 p.m. at the Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Metro Center, Bethesda, MD 20814. The meetings are open to the public.

Dated: January 17, 2008.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 08-318 Filed 1-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Signatures                         |   | Title                                                                |   | Date               |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|
|                               |   |                                                                 |   |               |
| /s/ Natalie RussellNatalie Russell |   | Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting OfficerSecretaryDirector |   | September 24, 2010 |

----
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TERRANCE A. BARGNARE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv43/MCR/MD

COUNTY OF SANTA ROSA,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on June 9, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after reviewing

objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is adopted as the

opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and

failure to comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of July, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010
of Flurida Group, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      November 20, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Yaru HangYaru
      HangChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Flurida Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Flurida Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cannabis Science,
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond C. Dabney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:  April 12, 2019



/s/ Raymond C. Dabney
Raymond C. Dabney
Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting Roundtable Discussion. 

# Date & Time:

 Friday, February 29, 2008, 9 a.m.-2 p.m. (EST).

# Place:

 United State Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW., Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005.

## Agenda

The Commission will host a voting systems manufacturer roundtable discussion regarding the Technical Guidelines Development Committee's (TGDC) recommended voluntary voting system guidelines (VVSG). The discussion will be focused upon the following topics: (1) The dominant business model for voting system manufacturers and their role as innovators; (2) How to evaluate innovative systems, for which there are no standards for purposes of certification; (3) The value and risks associated with Open Ended Vulnerability Testing; (4) The processes associated with testing to the VVSG and possible modifications; (5) Whether the recommend TGDC standards create appropriate functional standards that promote innovation; (6) The cost implications of the proposed VVSG; (7) Development of systems to the proposed VVSG and possible time frames.

This meeting will be open to the public.

# Person to Contact for Information:

 Matthew Masterson, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey, 

Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 08-565  Filed 2-5-08; 10:57 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and that information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pernix Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. for the periods covered by this annual report.





Date: March 30, 2011

/s/ Cooper C. CollinsCooper C. CollinsChief Executive Officer and PresidentDate: March 30, 2011

/s/ Tracy S. CliffordTracy S. CliffordChief Financial Officer and Secretary
Enc.

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH. 

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D.

 Madison, Wisconsin

Josie Beach

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson

 Rexburg, Idaho

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa

Michael H. Gibson

 Franklin, Ohio

Mark A. Griffon

 Salem, New Hampshire

Richard Lemen, Ph.D.

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D.

 Cincinnati, Ohio

Wanda I. Munn

 Richland, Washington

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D.

 College Station, Texas

Robert W. Presley

 Seymour, Tennessee

David B. Richardson, Ph.D.

 Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D.

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

February 26, 2010

Mr. Andrew Evaskovich

# 27 Camino Cerrado Apt. 131

Santa Fe, NM 87506

Dear Mr. Evaskovich: 

Thank you for your letter of February 1, 2010, to the Advisory Board on 

Radiation and Worker Health (the Board) regarding Special Exposure Cohort 

(SEC) Petition 109 for Los Alamos Laboratory Support Services Workers. 

In response to your letter as well as the petition’s request that the Board meet in 

or near Los Alamos when we deliberate on this SEC petition, the Board has 

decided to hold our November 16 to 18, 2010, meeting in the Los Alamos, NM.

We look forward to seeing you and others concerned about this issue at the 

November, 2010 meeting. Thank you for your continued interest in the Energy 

Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA) and 

the activities of this Board.

 Sincerely, 

 

 [Signature on file]

 

 James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. Ph.

 Chairman, ABRWH