UNITED STATES
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington D. C. 20549
 
 FORM 10-Q
 
 x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
 
 o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from ___ to _____
 
 Commission File Number 333-152023
 
 CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  Delaware

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

26-1657084

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
 3266 W. Galveston Drive #101
 Apache Junction, AZ 95120
 (Address of principal executive offices)
 
 480-288-6530
 (Issuer's telephone number)
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YESx   NOo
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).o Yeso No
 
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):
  Large accelerated filero
Accelerated fileroNon-accelerated filero
Smaller reporting companyx(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YESo NOx
   Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 95,119,018 shares as of August 22, 2011
  1
  Tableof Contents
 
 PagePart I –
Financial InformationItem 1. Consolidated Financial Statements
3Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
28Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
35Item 4. Controls and Procedures
35Part II –
Other InformationItem 1. Legal Proceedings
36Item 1A. Risk Factors
36Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
36Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
36Item 4. [Removed and Reserved]
36Item 5. Other Information
36Item 6. Exhibits
36
  2
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTALRESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES(FORMERLY AMERICAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSJune 30,


March 31,2011


2011(UNAUDITED)ASSETSCurrent assets:Cash

$
13,275,207


$
14,383,452Prepaid expenses - current portion


2,315,911



3,280,863Deposit


50,000



50,000Total current assets


15,641,118



17,714,315Other assets:Prepaid expenses - long term portion


42,742



45,234Property and equipment, net


41,137



31,728Mining rights


-



-Total Assets

$
15,724,997


$
17,791,277LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$
200,989


$
165,648Note payable


50,000



50,000Total liabilities


250,989



215,648Stockholders' Equity:Preferred stock, $.0001 par value, 25,000,000 sharesauthorized: no shares issued and outstanding


-



-Common stock, $.0001 par value, 200,000,000 sharesauthorized: 94,869,018 issued and outstandingat June 30, 2011 and 93,519,018 issued andoutstanding at March 31, 2011


9,487



9,352Additional paid-in capital


25,527,709



24,267,544Common stock, $.0001 par value, 250,000 shares tobe issued at June 30, 2011 and 850,000 shares tobe issued at March 31, 2011


211,000



955,000Accumulated  deficit


(10,260,255
)


(7,643,273
)Total Continental Resources Group, Inc. deficit


15,487,941



17,588,623Non-controlling interest in subsidiary


(13,933
)


(12,994
)Total stockholders' equity


15,474,008



17,575,629Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$
15,724,997


$
17,791,277
  See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
  3
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES(FORMERLY AMERICAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSFOR THE THREE MONTHS


FOR THE THREE MONTHS


PERIOD FROM INCEPTIONENDED


ENDED


NOVEMBER 23, 2009 TOJUNE 30, 2011


JUNE 30, 2010


JUNE 30, 2011(UNAUDITED)


(UNAUDITED)


(UNAUDITED)Revenues

$
-


$
-


$
-ExpensesExploration costs


22,371



26,693



246,466Impairment of mining rights


15,000



-



459,200Impairment of goodwill


-



-



3,065,014Depreciation


3,312



1,325



10,250Compensation and related taxes


202,575



90,976



837,574Professional and consulting


2,095,907



100,620



4,994,986General and administrative


285,506



101,922



1,322,886Total operating expenses


2,624,671



321,536



10,936,376Loss from operations


(2,624,671
)


(321,536
)


(10,936,376
)Other income (expenses)Interest expense


(1,500
)


-



(85,923
)Interest income


8,250



719



13,646Total other income (expenses)


6,750



719



(72,277
)Net loss

$
(2,617,921
)

$
(320,817
)

$
(11,008,653
)Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest


939



-



748,398Net loss attributable to Continental Resources Group, Inc.

$
(2,616,982
)

$
(320,817
)

$
(10,260,255
)NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:Basic and Diluted

$
(0.03
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.17
)WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARESOUTSTANDING - Basic and Diluted


94,737,351



50,528,255



60,548,162
  See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
  4
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES(FORMERLY AMERICAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSFOR THE THREE MONTHS


FOR THE THREE MONTHS


PERIOD FROM INCEPTIONENDED


ENDED


NOVEMBER 23, 2009 TOJUNE 30, 2011


JUNE 30, 2010


JUNE 30, 2011(UNAUDITED)


(UNAUDITED)


(UNAUDITED)Cash flows from operating activities:Net loss attributable to Continental Resources Group, Inc.

$
(2,616,982
)

$
(320,817
)

$
(10,260,255
)Adjustments to reconcile net loss attributable to Continental ResourcesGroup, Inc. to net cash used in operating activities:Depreciation


3,312



1,325



10,250Amortization of prepaid expenses


367,053



-



367,053Stock based compensation on options granted


73,800



-



310,400Amortization of prepaid expense in connectionwith the issuance of warrants issued for prepaid services


739,809



-



1,233,015Amortization of prepaid expense in connectionwith the issuance of common stock issued for prepaid services


656,083



-



904,083Consulting fees paid by issuance of common stock


-



-



36,000Common stock issued for directors' compensation


-



-



49,000Impairment of goodwill


-



-



3,065,014Non-controlling interest


(939
)


-



(748,398
)Amortization of debt discount


-



-



76,000Common stock issued for services


-



-



1,400,000Impairment of mining rights


15,000



-



459,200Changes in operating assets and liabilities(Increase) in accounts receivable


-



(7,000
)


-(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses - current portion


(353,001
)


18,000



(908,471
)(Increase) in deposits


-



-



(50,000
)Decrease in prepaid expenses - long term portion


-



-



417Increase in accounts payable & liabilities


35,341



529



150,732Net cash used in operating activities


(1,080,524
)


(307,963
)


(3,905,960
)Cash flows from investing activities:Acquisition of mining rights


(15,000
)


(65,000
)


(289,200
)Acquisition of Secure Energy LLC (cash portion)


-



-



(59,959
)Purchase of office equipment and vehicle


(12,721
)


(19,330
)


(51,387
)Net cash used in investing activities


(27,721
)


(84,330
)


(400,546
)Cash flows from financing activities:Proceeds from convertible promissory notes


-



-



100,000Payment of convertible promissory note


-



-



(50,000
)Proceeds from sale of common stock, net of issuance cost


-



-



17,531,713Net cash provided by financing activities


-



-



17,581,713Net  increase in cash


(1,108,245
)


(392,293
)


13,275,207Cash at beginning of year


14,383,452



962,392



-Cash at end of period

$
13,275,207


$
570,099


$
13,275,207SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW  INFORMATION:Cash paid for:Interest

$
-


$
-


$
2,250Income taxes

$
-


$
-


$
-SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Beneficial conversion feature and debt discount in connection with theissuance of convertible promissory notes

$
-


$
-


$
41,000Debt discount in connection with the conversionof convertible promissory notes into a qualified financing

$
-


$
-


$
35,000Issuance of common stock for conversionof convertible promissory notes and accrued interest

$
-


$
-


$
50,416Stock warrants issued for prepaid services

$
-


$
-


$
2,712,632Issuance of common stock in connection with theacquisition of Secure Energy, LLC

$
-


$
-


$
2,960,000Assumption of note payable in connection with theacquisition of Secure Energy, LLC

$
-


$
-


$
50,000Common stock to be issued for prepaid services

$
-


$
-


$
744,000Issuance of common stock for purchaseof mining rights

$
-


$
-


$
170,000
  See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
  5
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
  NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
 
 The unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  The consolidated financial statements and notes are presented as permitted on Form 10-Q and do not contain information included in the Company’s annual statements and notes.  Certain information and footnote disclosure normally included in consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.  It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the March 31, 2011 Form 10-K filed with the SEC, including the audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes thereto.  While management believes the procedures followed in preparing these financial statements are reasonable, the accuracy of the amounts are in some respects dependent upon the facts that will exist, and procedures that will be accomplished by the Company later in the year.
 
 These unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
 
 Continental Resources Group, Inc. (the "Company"), formerly American Energy Fields, Inc. was incorporated as Sienna Resources, Inc. in the State of Delaware on July 20, 2007 to engage in the acquisition, exploration and development of natural resource properties.  On December 21, 2009 we had filed an Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware in order to change our name to “American Energy Fields, Inc.”, change our authorized capital to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share and create “blank check” preferred stock. On June 28, 2011, the Company changed its name to Continental Resources Group, Inc. from “American Energy Fields, Inc.
 
 On December 24, 2009, the Company entered into a Share Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange Agreement”) with Green Energy Fields, Inc., a privately-held Nevada corporation (“Green Energy”), and the shareholders of Green Energy.  Upon closing of the transaction contemplated under the Exchange Agreement, on December 24, 2009, the shareholders of Green Energy transferred all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Green Energy to the Company in exchange for shares of the Company’s common stock (the “Exchange”).  Such Exchange caused Green Energy to become our wholly-owned subsidiary.  Immediately following the closing of the Exchange, under an Agreement of Conveyance, Transfer and Assignment of Assets and Assumption of Obligations (the “Conveyance Agreement”),the Company transferred all of its pre-Exchange assets and liabilities (“Split-off”) to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sienna Resources Holdings, Inc. (“SplitCo”).  Thereafter, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement, the Company transferred all of the outstanding capital stock of SplitCo to Julie Carter, its former officer and director, in exchange for the cancellation of shares of the Company’s common stock that she owned.  Following the Exchange and the Split-off, the Company’s sole line of business is the business of Green Energy.
 
 The Company is now primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of properties that may contain uranium mineralization in the United States.  Our target properties are those that have been the subject of historical exploration.  The Company has acquired State Leases and federal unpatented mining claims in the states of Arizona and California for the purpose of exploration and potential development of uranium minerals on a total of approximately 7,200 acres.
 
 Since the Company had no assets of substance prior to the Exchange, for accounting purposes the Exchange has been treated as a merger of both companies and recapitalization of the shares of Green Energy with the Company.  The accounting rules for reverse acquisitions require that, beginning with the date of the acquisition (December 24, 2009), the balance sheet include the assets and liabilities of Green Energy and the equity accounts be recapitalized to reflect the net equity of Green Energy.  Accordingly, the historical operating results of Green Energy are now the operating results of the Company. Green Energy was formed on November 23, 2009.
  6
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
  NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS (continued)
 
 Effective November 23, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105-10, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – Overall (“ASC 105-10”). ASC 105-10 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority. The Codification superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification is non-authoritative. The FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Positions or Emerging Issue Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”).
 
 The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. References made to FASB guidance throughout this document have been updated for the Codification.
 
 Going Concern
 
 Future issuances of the Company's equity or debt securities will be required in order for the Company to continue to finance its operations and continue as a going concern. The Company's present revenues are insufficient to meet operating expenses.
 
 The consolidated financial statement of the Company have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates, among other things, the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business over a reasonable period of time. The Company has incurred a net loss attributable to Continental Resources Group, Inc. of $2,616,982 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and cumulative net losses of $10,260,255 since its inception and requires capital for its contemplated operational and marketing activities to take place. The Company's ability to raise additional capital through the future issuances of common stock is unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development of the Company's contemplated plan of operations, and its transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. The ability to successfully resolve these factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of these aforementioned uncertainties.
 
 NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
 PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
 
 The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("US GAAP") and present the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, three wholly-owned subsidiaries, and a subsidiary with a majority voting interest of   75.68% (24.32% is owned by non-controlling interests) as of June 30, 2011. In the preparation of consolidated financial statements of the Company, intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated and net earnings are reduced by the portion of the net earnings of subsidiaries applicable to non-controlling interests.
 
 EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY
 
 The Company has been in the exploration stage since its formation and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations. The Company was formed for the purpose of acquiring exploration and development stage natural resource properties. The Company has not commenced business operations. The Company is an exploration stage company as defined in ASC 915 “Development Stage Entities”.
  7
 Table of Contents
 CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
  NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
 
 NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS IN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810-10-65, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51,” (“SFAS No. 160”).  This statement clarifies that a non-controlling (minority) interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. It also requires consolidated net income to include the amounts attributable to both the parent and non-controlling interest, with disclosure on the face of the consolidated income statement of the amounts attributed to the parent and to the non-controlling interest. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with presentation and disclosure requirements applied retrospectively to comparative financial statements. In accordance with ASC 810-10-45-21, those losses attributable to the parent and the non-controlling interest in subsidiary may exceed their interests in the subsidiary’s equity. The excess and any further losses attributable to the parent and the non-controlling interest shall be attributed to those interests even if that attribution results in a deficit non-controlling interest balance. As of June 30, 2011, the Company recorded a deficit non-controlling interest balance of $13,933 in connection with our majority-owned subsidiary, Secure Energy LLC as reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
 
 USE OF ESTIMATES
 
 The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to investment tax credits, bad debts, income taxes and contingencies. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Significant estimates made by management include, but are not limited to, the useful life of property and equipment, the assumptions used to calculate stock-based compensation, and debt discount, valuation of goodwill, and common stock issued for services. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
 RECLASSIFICATION
 
 Certain amounts in the 2010 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2011 presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on the reported net loss.
 
 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 
 The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments and other short-term investments with maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents.  The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent balances at one financial institution that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company’s account at this institution is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC") up to $250,000. In addition to the basic insurance deposit coverage, the FDIC is providing temporary unlimited coverage for non-interest bearing transaction accounts through December 31, 2012. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company has reached bank balances exceeding the FDIC insurance limit by approximately $9,219,000. The Company has not incurred any losses on bank balances exceeding the FDIC insurance limit. To reduce its risk associated with the failure of such financial institution, the Company evaluates at least annually the rating of the financial institution in which it holds deposits.
 
 MINERAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION AND EXPLORATION COSTS
 
 Costs of lease, acquisition, exploration, carrying and retaining unproven mineral lease properties are expensed as incurred. The Company has chosen to expense all mineral acquisition and exploration costs as incurred given that it is still in the exploration stage. Once the Company has identified proven and probable reserves in its investigation of its properties and upon development of a plan for operating a mine, it would enter the development stage and capitalize future costs until production is established. When a property reaches the production stage, the related capitalized costs will be amortized, using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable-proven reserves. When the Company has capitalized mineral properties, these properties will be periodically assessed for impairment of value and any diminution in value. To date, the Company has not established the commercial feasibility of any exploration prospects; therefore, all costs are being expensed. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred exploration cost of $22,371.
  8
 Table of Contents
 CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
  NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
 
 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
 Property and equipment are carried at cost. The cost of repairs and maintenance is expensed as incurred; major replacements and improvements are capitalized.  When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gains or losses are included in income in the year of disposition.  Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets, generally three to seven  years.
 
 INCOME TAXES
 
 Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method in accordance with ASC 740,Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases as well as operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent that the recoverability of the asset is unlikely to be recognized.
 
 The Company follows ASC 740 rules governing uncertain tax positions, which provides guidance for recognition and measurement. This prescribes a threshold condition that a tax position must meet for any of the benefits of the uncertain tax position to be recognized in the financial statements. It also provides accounting guidance on derecognization, classification and disclosure of these uncertain tax positions.
 
 FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
 The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC 820 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing US GAAP that require the use of fair value measurements which establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements.
 
 ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, ASC 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized below:
 
 Level 1:
Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilitiesLevel 2:
Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market dataLevel 3:
Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity’s own assumptions.
 
 The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate their estimated fair market value based on the short-term maturity of this instrument. The carrying amount of the convertible promissory note at June 30, 2011, approximate their respective fair value based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate.
 
 In addition, FASB ASC 825-10-25 “Fair Value Option” was effective for January 1, 2008. ASC 825-10-25 expands opportunities to use fair value measurements in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.
  9
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
  NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
 
 NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
 
 Net loss per common share is calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 260: Earnings Per Share (“ASC 260”). Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. The computation of diluted net loss per share does not include dilutive common stock equivalents in the weighted average shares outstanding as they would be anti-dilutive. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted loss per share:
  Three months endedJune 30, 2011


Three months endedJune 30, 2010


Period from Inception November 23, 2009 to June 30, 2011Numerator:

Net loss attributable to Continental Resources Group, Inc.

$
(2,616,982
)

$
(320,817
)

$
(10,260,255
)Denominator:Denominator for basic loss per share

(weighted-average shares)


94,737,351



50,528,255



60,548,162Denominator for dilutive loss per share

(weighted-average shares)


149,506,100



55,928,255



115,316,911Basic and diluted loss per share

$
(0.03
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.17
)
 
 The following sets forth the computation of weighted-average common shares outstanding basic and diluted:
  Three months endedJune 30, 2011


Three months endedJune 30, 2010


Period from Inception November 23, 2009 to June 30, 2011Weighted-average common shares outstanding (Basic)


94,737,351



50,528,255



60,548,162EquivalentsStock options


2,810,000



750,000



2,810,000Warrants


51,958,749



4,650,000



51,958,749Weighted-average common shares outstanding (Diluted)


149,506,100



55,928,255



115,316,911
  10
 Table of Contents
 CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 
 NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
 
 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
 
 In accordance with ASC 350- 30-65 (formerly SFAS 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”), the Company assesses the impairment of identifiable intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:
 
 1.
Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
  2.
Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and3.
Significant negative industry or economic trends.
  When the Company determines that the carrying value of intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and the carrying value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge. The Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an indicator of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows. During fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded an impairment of goodwillof $3,065,014 associated with the acquisition of Secure Energy. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Secure Energy has not generated future cash flows and has not generated revenues since its inception, has incurred losses and cash used in operations, management deemed the acquired goodwill to be impaired and wrote-off the goodwill on the acquisition date.
 
 IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
 
 The Company accounts for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets according to the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment”. ASC 360 clarifies the accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of, including the disposal of business segments and major lines of business. Long-lived assets are reviewed when facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. When necessary, impaired assets are written down to estimate fair value based on the best information available. Estimated fair value is generally based on either appraised value or measured by discounting estimated future cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to estimate discounted future cash flows. Accordingly, actual results could vary significantly from such estimates.During the year ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded impairment of mining rights of $444,200.The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Such cost were impaired during theyear ended March 31, 2011as the associated mining properties do not currently have any identified proven and probablereserves. Additionally, the Company recorded impairment charges of $15,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2011.
 
 STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
 
 Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the consolidated financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.
 
 Pursuant to ASC Topic 505-50, for share-based payments to consultants and other third-parties, compensation expense is determined at the “measurement date.” The expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date.
  11
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
 
 PREPAID EXPENSES
 
 Prepaid expenses – current portion of $2,315,911 and $3,280,863 at June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively, consist primarily of costs paid for future services which will occur within a year. Prepaid expenses include prepayments (in cash, common stocks and warrants) of public relation services, consulting and business advisory services and prepaid mineral lease which are being amortized over the terms of their respective agreements. Prepaid expenses – long term portion of $42,742 and $45,234 at June 30, 2011 and March 31, 2011, respectively, consist primarily of costs paid for future mineral lease payments after one year.
 
 RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
 
 In January 2010, the Company adopted FASB ASU No. 2010-06,Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). These standards require new disclosures on the amount and reason for transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements. The standards also require new disclosures of activities, including purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within the Level 3 fair value measurements. The standard also clarifies existing disclosure requirements on levels of disaggregation and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. These new disclosures are effective beginning with the first interim filing in 2010.  The disclosures about the roll-forward of information in Level 3 are required for the Company with its first interim filing in 2011. The adoption of ASU No. 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the results of operations and financial condition.
 
 In February 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for, and disclosure of, subsequent events in an entity’s consolidated financial statements. This standard amends the authoritative guidance for subsequent events that was previously issued and among other things exempts Securities and Exchange Commission registrants from the requirement to disclose the date through which it has evaluated subsequent events for either original or restated financial statements. This standard does not apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the scope of other applicable GAAP that provides different guidance on the accounting treatment for subsequent events or transactions. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
 In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20,Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.    ASU 2010-20 requires additional disclosures about the credit quality of a company’s loans and the allowance for loan losses held against those loans.  Companies will need to disaggregate new and existing disclosures based on how it develops its allowance for loan losses and how it manages credit exposures.  Additional disclosure is also required about the credit quality indicators of loans by class at the end of the reporting period, the aging of past due loans, information about troubled debt restructurings, and significant purchases and sales of loans during the reporting period by class.  The new guidance is effective for interim- and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010.  The Company anticipates that adoption of these additional disclosures will not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
 
 Other ASU’s that have been issued or proposed by the FASB ASC that do not require adoption until a future date and are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption.
  12
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 NOTE 3 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
 
 Property and equipment are made up of the following as of:
 
 Estimated Life

June 30, 2011 
(Unaudited)


March 31, 2011Office equipment
7 years

$
5,760


$
2,330Machinery and equipment
5 years


13,530



4,239Vehicle
3 years


32,097



32,097Total



51,377



38,666Less accumulated depreciation



10,250



6,938$
41,137


$
31,728
 
 Depreciation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was $3,312 and $1,325, respectively.
 
 NOTE 4 - MINERAL CLAIMS
 
 ARTILLERY PEAK
 
 The Artillery Peak Property is located in western north-central Arizona near the southern edge of Mohave County. The Company’s claim group is composed of a total of 86 unpatented contiguous mining claims in Sections 22, 26, 27, 35, and 36 of Township 12 North, Range 13 West, Gila & Salt River Base & Meridian covering 1,720 acres of land managed by the BLM.
 
 On April 26, 2010, the Company acquired a 100% interest (minus a 3% net smelter royalty interest) in 86 unpatented lode mining claims, located in Mohave county, Arizona for $65,000 in cash and 200,000 shares of common stock.
 
 To maintain the Artillery Peak mining claims in good standing, we must make annual maintenance fee payments to the BLM, in lieu of annual assessment work. These claim fees are $140.00 per claim per year, plus minimal per claims cost of approximately $10 to $15 per claim recording fees to Mohave County where the claims are located.
 
 The Artillery Peak Property is subject to an agreement to pay a net smelter return royalty interest of 3%. To date, there has been no production on the Property, and no royalties are owed. The claims are not subject to any other royalties or encumbrances.
 
 The Artillery Peak Property lies within the Date Creek Basin, which is a region well known for significant uranium occurrence.  Uranium exploration has been occurring in the Artillery Peak region since the 1950’s by a number of exploration and mining entities. Radioactivity was first discovered in the Date Creek Basin area by the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission in 1955 when a regional airborne radiometric survey was flown over the area. The Artillery Peak Property was first acquired by Jacquays Mining and first drilled in 1957. Subsequently the Property was acquired by Hecla Mining (1967), Getty Oil (1976) with a joint venture with Public Service Co of Oklahoma, Hometake Mining (1976) on adjacent properties to the south, Santa Fe Minerals (also around 1976), and Universal Uranium Limited in 2007.  As of 2007, a total of 443 exploration holes were drilled into the Artillery Peak Property area.
 
 The Artillery Peak uranium occurrences lie in the northwest part of the Miocene-age Date Creek Basin, which extends from the east to the west in a west-southwest direction, and includes the Anderson Uranium Mine.  The uranium anomalies are found primarily within a lacustrine rock unit known as the Artillery Peak Formation.  The uranium bearing sediments are typically greenish in color and are thin-bedded to laminated, well-sorted, sandstone, siltstone and limestone.
  13
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 NOTE 4 - MINERAL CLAIMS (continued)
 
 The Company released a technical report on October 12, 2010 formatted according to Canadian National Instrument 43-101 standards prepared by Dr. Karen Wenrich, an expert on uranium mineralization in the southwestern United States, and Allen Wells, who performed a mineral resource estimate (as defined by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum) based on historical data and the recent 2007 data.  As recommended in the technical report, the Company expects to develop plans to conduct exploration drilling to further delineate the extent and nature of the uranium mineralization at the Artillery Peak Property.  We are currently developing a detailed exploration plan for the Artillery Peak Property, together with budgets and timetables.
 
 Access to the property is either southeast from Kingman or northwest from Wickenburg along U.S. Highway 93, then following the Signal Mountain Road (dirt) for 30 miles toward Artillery Peak. Road access within the claim block is on unimproved dirt roads that currently are in good condition.  The property is undeveloped, and there are no facilities or structures.
 
 A power line runs northeast to southwest approximately 2 miles to the northwest of the Artillery Peak Property, and power for the Property will be tied to the national power grid. Other than that, no utilities exist on or near the Artillery Peak Project area. The transmission power line runs northwest to southeast along U.S. Highway 93, approximately 30 miles to the east.  The water supply may be provided by drilling in the thick alluvial fill and located only 2-7 miles from the perennial Big Sandy River.
 
 The Artillery Peak Property does not currently have any reserves.  All activities undertaken and currently proposed at the Artillery Peak Property are exploratory in nature.
 
 COSO
 
 The Coso property is located in Inyo County, California near the town of Lone Pine on the western margin of Coso Mountains, 32 miles (51km) south by road of Lone Pine in Inyo County, California, 150 miles (241km) northeast by road to Bakersfield, CA, 187 miles (300km) north by road of Los Angeles, CA and 283 miles (455km) west by road of Las Vegas.  The Coso Project is accessible from U.S. Highway 395 by taking the Cactus Flat road, an unimproved rod for about 3 to 4 miles east of the highway, and climbing approximately 500 to 1200 feet above the floor of Owens Valley.
 
 On December 24, 2009, as a result of the Exchange, the Company acquired a 100% working interest and 97% net revenue interest in the Coso property.  Prior to our acquisition, Green Energy Fields acquired the Coso Project on November 30, 2009 from NPX Metals, Inc., a Nevada Corporation.  The 97% net revenue interest is the result of the Agreement of Conveyance.  Transfer and Assignment of Assets and Assumption of Obligations dated as of November 30, 2010.  Under the terms of the agreement, NPX Metals, Inc. retained a 3% net smelter return royalty interest in the Coso Property, leaving a 97% net revenue interest to Green Energy Fields, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.
 
 The Coso property consists of 169 Federal unpatented lode mineral claims on Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) land totaling   3,380 acres, and 800 State leased acres, in Inyo County, CA.  The unpatented mining claims overlie portions of section 12, 13, 24, 25, 26, 35 and 36 of Township 20 South, Range 37 East (Mount Diablo Base and Meridian), sections 13, 24 and 25 of Township 20 South, Range 37 1⁄2 East (Mount Diablo Base & Meridian), sections 1 and 12 of Township 21, South Range 37 East (mount Diablo Base & Meridian), and sections 6 and 7 of Township 21 South, Range 37 1⁄2 East (Mount Diablo Base & Meridian).  The state lease covers portions of section 6 of Township 20 South, Range 37 East (Mount Diablo Base & Meridian) and section 36 of Township 20 South, Range 37 1⁄2 East (Mount Diablo Base & Meridian).  To maintain the Coso mining claims in good standing, the Company must make annual maintenance fee payments to the BLM, in lieu of annual assessment work.  These claim fees are $140.00 per claim per year, plus a recording cost of approximately $50 to Inyo County where the claims are located.  With regard to the unpatented lode mining claims, future exploration drilling at the Coso Project will require the Company to either file a Notice of Intent or a Plan of Operations with the Bureau of Land Management, depending upon the amount of new surface disturbance that is planned.  A Notice of Intent is for planned surface activities that anticipate less than 5.0 acres of surface disturbance, and usually can be obtained within a 30 to 60-day time period.  A Plan of Operations will be required if there is greater than 5.0 acres of new surface disturbance involved with the planned exploration work.  A Plan of Operations can take several months to be approved, depending on the nature of the intended work, the level of reclamation bonding required, the need for archeological surveys, and other factors as may be determined by the BLM.  With regard to the state mineral prospecting permit, The Company is authorized to locate on the ground past drill holes, adits, trenches and pits, complete a scintilometer survey, and conduct a sampling program including a bulk sample of 1,000 pounds for leach test.  The Company is not currently authorized to conduct exploration drilling on the state lease.  Any future drilling on the state mineral prospecting permit will require the Company to file environmental documentation under the California Environmental Quality Act.
  14
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 NOTE 4 - MINERAL CLAIMS (continued)
 
 The Coso property and the surrounding region is located in an arid environment in the rain shadow of the Sierra Nevada mountains.  The property is located near the western margin of the Basin and Range province, a large geologic province in western North America characterized by generally north-south trending fault block mountain ranges separated by broad alluvial basins.  The geology of the area includes late Jurassic granite bedrock overlain by the Coso Formation, which consists of interfingered gravels, arkosic sandstone, and rhyolitic tuff.  The Coso Formation is overlain by a series of lakebed deposits and volcanic tuffs.
 
 Uranium mineralization at the Coso Property occurs primarily as disseminated deposits in the lower arkosic sandstone/fanglomerate member of the Coso Formation and along silicified fractures and faults within the granite.  Uranium mineralization appears to have been deposited by hudrpthermal fluids moving along fractures in the granite and the overlying Coso Formation.  Mineralization is often accompanied by hermatite staining, silicification, and dark staining from sulfides.  Autinite is the only positively identified uranium mineral in the area.  The main uranium anomalies are found within the basal arkose of the lower Coso Formation and the immediately adjacent granitic rocks.
 
 Uranium exploration has been occurring in the area since the 1950s by a number of mining companies, including Coso Uranium, Inc., Ontario Minerals Company, Western Nuclear, Pioneer Nuclear, Federal Resources Corp., and Union Pacific/RockyMountain Energy Corp.  Previous uranium exploration and prospecting on the Coso property includes geologic mapping, pitting, adits, radon cup surveys, airbone geophysics and drilling.  Our preliminary field observations of the geology and historical working appear to corroborate the historical literature.  These historical exploration programs have identified specific exploration targets on the property.  All previous work has been exploratory in nature and no mineral extraction or processing facilities have been constructed.  The exploration activities have resulted in over 400 known exploration holes, downhole gamma log data on the drill holes, chemical assay data, and airborne radiometric surveys, and metallurgical testing to determine amenability to leaching.
 
 The property is undeveloped, and there are no facilities or structures.  There are a number of adits and trenches from previous exploration activities as well as more than 400 exploration drill holes.
 
 The last major exploration activities on the Coso Property occurred during a drilling campaign in the mid-1970s.  As of June 30, 2011, the Company had conducted field reconnaissance and mineral sampling on the property, but has not conducted any drilling of geophysical surveys.  The Company plans to locate and identify the uranium anomalies targeted by previous exploration for further evaluation.  If feasible old drill holes in prospective areas will e re-entered and logged by down-hole radiometric probes to identify zones and grades of subsurface uranium mineralization.
 
 Power is available from the Mono Power Company transmission lines, which parallel U.S. highway 395.  As of June 30, 2011the water source had not yet been determined.
 
 As of June 30, 2011, an exploration timetable and budget had not yet been developed and there were no current detailed plans to conduct exploration on the property.
 
 As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not have a sample collection.
 
 With regard to the state mineral prospecting permit, the Company is currently authorized to locate on the ground past drill holes, adits trenches and pits, complete a scintilometer survey, and conduct a sampling program including a bulk sample of 1000 pounds for leach test.  The Company is not currently authorized to conduct exploration drilling on the state lease.  Any future drilling on the state mineral prospecting permit will require the Company to file environmental documentation under the California Environmental Quality Act.
 
 The Coso Property does not currently have any known reserves.  All activities undertaken and currently proposed at the Coso Property are exploratory in mature.
  15
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 NOTE 4 - MINERAL CLAIMS (continued)
 
 BLYTHE
 
 The Blythe project is located in the southern McCoy Mountains in Riverside County, California approximately 15 miles west of the community of Blythe.  It consists of 66 lode mining claims (the NPG Claims) covering 1320 acres of BLM land.
 
 On December 24, 2009, as a result of the Exchange, the Company acquired a 100% interest (minus a 3% Net Smelter Return Royalty) in the Blythe Property.  Prior to our acquisition, Green Energy acquired the project on November 30, 2009.
 
 The Blythe property is located in an arid environment within the Basin and Range Province.  The southern McCoy Mountains are composed of Precambrian metasediments, including meta-conglomerates, grits, quartzities and minor interbedded shales.
 
 A number of companies have worked on the Blythe uranium property during the 1950s through the 1980s.  Several shipments of ore were reportedly shipped from the property.
 
 The Blythe Prospect occurs in the southern McCoy Mountains, which are composed of Precambrian metasediments, including meta-conglomerates, grits, quartzites and minor interbedded shales.
 
 Uranium mineralization occurs along fractures, in meta-conglomerates and in breccia zones. Secondary uranium minerals occur on fracture surfaces and foliation planes adjacent to fine veinlets of pitchblende. Uranium minerals include uraninite (pitchblende), uranophane, gummite and boltwoodite. It has been reported that the uranium mineralization tends to occur in areas where finely disseminated hematite is present.
 
 Although there are no known intrusive bodies near the property, it is believed that the uranium mineralization could be hydrothermal in origin and genetically related to an intrusive source.  If such a deep-seated intrusive body underlies the property it is possible that larger concentrations of primary uranium ore may exist at depth.
 
 A number of companies have worked on the Blythe uranium property during the 1950s through the 1980s. Several shipments of ore were reportedly shipped from the property.
 
 As of June 30, 2011, the Company was still in the process of assessing the Blythe Property.
 
 The Blythe Property does not currently have any known reserves.  All activities undertaken and currently proposed at the Coso Property are exploratory in nature.
 
 BRECCIA PIPE PROJECT
 
 On February 15, 2011, the Company, its wholly owned subsidiary, Green Energy, and Dr. Karen Wenrich entered into an asset purchase agreement pursuant to which Green Energy has agreed to purchase certain unpatented mining claims commonly known as the “Arizona Breccia Pipes Project” located in the Coconino and Mohave counties of Arizona only upon the occurrence of certain conditions precedent.  The consummation of the mining purchase will occur only in the event that certain actions taken by the BLM on July 20, 2009, which had the effect of withdrawing certain lands in the vicinity of the property from mineral location and entry, are terminated within five (5) years from the date of the Agreement leaving more than 50% of the total unpatented mining claims that comprise the property open to mineral location and entry.  In the event the withdrawal termination occurs that results in fewer than 50% of the total unpatented mining claims that comprise the property opened to mineral location and entry, Green Energy will have an unrestricted option to purchase the property pursuant to the terms of the agreement (the “Purchase Option”).  The Purchase Option expires 120 days from the date of the withdrawal termination.
 
 The withdrawal is currently being studied in an Environmental Impact Statement prepared by the BLM.  The withdrawal at any time may be extended in duration and scope and there can be no assurance that the withdrawal termination will occur and that the Mining Purchase will occur.
 
 Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, in the event of the closing, Green Energy has agreed to spend an aggregate of at least $1,500,000 in exploration and related work commitments on the Property over the course of three (3) years from the date of closing with, a promised expenditure of $250,000 within the first year of closing.  Green Energy will retain a right of first refusal for the sale of any additional properties, of which Dr. Wenrich becomes a majority owner, within a 30-mile radius of the property.
  16
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 NOTE 4 - MINERAL CLAIMS (continued)
 
 These breccia pipes are vertical pipe-like columns of broken rock (breccia) that formed when layers of sandstone, shale and limestone collapsed downward into underlying caverns. A typical pipe is approximately 300 feet in diameter and extends vertically as much as 3,000 feet.
 
 The uranium-bearing breccia pipes of the northern Arizona breccia pipe district are among the highest grade uranium deposits in the United States.  In addition to uranium, the breccia pipes are also known to contain rare earth metals, including neodymium, and a variety of other valuable metals, including zinc, vanadium, cadmium, copper, silver, molybdenum, cobalt, nickel, gallium, and germanium.
 
 The Breccia Pipe Property does not currently have any reserves.  All activities undertaken and currently proposed at the Breccia Pipe Property are exploratory in nature.  Currently, we are still in the process of assessing the Breccia Pipe Property.
 
 PROSPECT URANIUM
 
 On March 17, 2011, the Company entered into Membership Interests Sale Agreements with Prospect Uranium Inc., a Nevada corporation and Gordon R. Haworth for the purchase of 51.35549% and 24.32225% respectively of the membership interests of Secure Energy LLC, a North Dakota limited liability company.
 
 Secure Energy’s current assets include the following:
 
 1.
Data package including historical exploration data including drill logs, surface samples, maps, reports and other information on various uranium prospects in North Dakota.2.
Uranium Lease Agreement with Robert Petri, Jr. and Michelle Petri dated June 28, 2007.  Location: Township 134 North, Range 100 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian.  Sec. 30: Lots 1 (37.99), 2 (38.13), 3 (38.27), 4 (38.41) and E1/2 W1/2 and SE 1/4.3.
Uranium Lease Agreement with Robert W. Petri and Dorothy Petri dated June 28, 2007.  Location: Township 134 North, Range 100 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian.  Sec. 30: Lots 1 (37.99), 2 (38.13), 3 (38.27), 4 (38.41) and E1/2 W1/2 and SE 1/4.4.
Uranium Lease Agreement with Mark E. Schmidt dated November 23, 2007.  Location: Township 134 North, Range 100 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian.  Sec. 31: Lots 1 (38.50), 2 (38.54), 3 (38.58), 4 (38.62) and E1/2 W1/2, W1/2NE1/4, SE 1/4.
 
 The uranium lease agreements include the rights to conduct exploration for and mine uranium, thorium, vanadium, other fissionable source materials, and all other mineral substances contained on or under the leased premises.   The leased premises consist of a total of 1,027 acres located in Slope County, North Dakota.
 
 Drill logs from the uranium leases show uranium mineralized roll fronts in sandstone, with uranium mineralization occurring within 350 feet of the surface.  Additional layers of sandstone exist at deeper intervals but have not been cored or logged.
 
 The Prospect Uranium Property does not currently have any reserves.  All activities undertaken and currently proposed at the Prospect Uranium Property are exploratory in nature.  Currently, we are still in the process of assessing the Prospect Uranium Property.
  17
 Table of Contents
 CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
  NOTE 4 - MINERAL CLAIMS (continued)
 
 ABSAROKA STONE
 
 On May 27, 2011, the Company entered into purchase and sale agreement (the “Agreement”) with Absaroka Stone LLC (“Absaroka”) pursuant to which the Company has agreed to purchase certain unpatented mining claims commonly known as the “Uinta County (Carnotite) Uranium Prospect” located in the Uinta County of Wyoming (the “Property” and the transaction, the “Mining Purchase”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Absaroka agreed not to stake for its own account any additional mining claims within a fifteen mile radius of the Property.  Any additional mining claims to be located within the fifteen (15) mile radius of the Property (the “Claim Body”) shall be located, staked and filed by the Company, at the Company’s expense and held in the Company’s name.  In consideration for the purchase of the Property, the Company paid Absaroka $15,000 upon execution of the Agreement.  Additionally, the Company agreed to spend a minimum of $200,000 relating to location, maintenance, exploration, development or equipping any one or more of the mining claims that comprise the Claim Body for commercial production within 24 months from the date of the Agreement.  If the Company fails to incur a minimum of $200,000 in expenses related to the foregoing within 24 months, the Company shall pay an aggregate sum of $50,000 to Absaroka. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company agrees to pay a 1% gross royalty (the “Royalty Payment”) to Absaroka on any revenues derived from the sale of all uranium-vanadium, gold, silver, copper and rare earth ores or concentrates produced from the Claim Body, up to an aggregate of $1,000,000.  The Company has the option to eliminate the obligation of the Royalty Payment by paying Absaroka an aggregate payment of $1,000,000.
 
 The Absaroka Property does not currently have any reserves.  All activities undertaken and currently proposed at the Absaroka Property are exploratory in nature.
 
 NOTE 5 – NOTE PAYABLE
 
 Note Payable
 
 On March 17, 2011, in connection with the execution of Membership Interests Sale Agreements of Secure Energy, the Company assumed a 12% $50,000 due on demand note from Prospect Uranium Inc. (see Note 2). As of June 30, 2011, the Company accrued interest of $9,500.
 
 Convertible Promissory Notes
 
 Between October 15, 2010 and December 3, 2010, the Company issued secured convertible promissory notes in theaggregate principal amount of $100,000. The convertible promissory notes mature onthe sixth month anniversary of the date of issuance and accrue interest at an annual rate of ten percent (10%).  The convertible promissory notesare payable in full on the maturity date unless previously converted into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion price of $1.00 per share.  In connection with these convertible promissory notes, the Company granted 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant.
 
 Additionally, based on the promissory note agreement, the holders of the convertible promissory notesshall have the right to convert the principal and any interest due under the convertible promissory notes into the shares of the Company issued and sold to investors in a Qualified Financing as defined in the convertible promissory note agreement, at a conversion price equal/similar to purchase price per share of the Qualified Financing securities paid by the investors in such financing.
 
 In December 2010, the Company had a private placement qualified as Qualified Financing (discussed above) and thus a holder of $50,000 worth of convertible promissory note exercised its right under the agreement to have the outstanding principal of and accrued interest on such note converted into similar securities offered in the private placement/qualified financing. Convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 (plus $416 in accrued interest) converted into 100,833 units in the private placement on December 29, 2010. Such units include 100,833 shares of the Company’s common stock and a five year warrant to purchase 100,833 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
  18
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 NOTE 5 – NOTE PAYABLE (continued)
 
 In January 2011, the Company paid $50,000 plus interest of $2,250 in connection with the convertible promissory note issued in October 2010.
 
 At the date of issuance,the Company allocated the proceeds received from such financing transaction to the convertible promissory note and the detached 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock on a relative fair value basis in accordance with ASC 470 -20 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options”. Therefore the portion of proceeds allocated to the convertible debentures and the detached common stock amounted to $100,000 and was determined based on the relative fair values of each instruments at the time of issuance.  Consequently the Company recorded a debt discount of $41,000 and is being amortized over the term of the convertible promissory notes. Additionally, in December 2010, the Company recognized additional debt discount of $35,000 from the conversion of $50,000 into similar securities offered in the private placement/qualified financing and such debt discount was amortized in December 2010.
 
 The Company evaluated whether or not the convertible promissory notes contain embedded conversion features, which meet thedefinition of derivatives under ASC 815-15 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and related interpretations. The Company concluded that since the convertible promissorynotes have a fixed conversion price of $1.00, the convertible promissory notes are not considered derivatives. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, amortization of debt discount amounted to $76,000.
 
 As of June 30, 2011, convertible promissory notes including accrued interest amounted to $0.
 
 NOTE 6 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
 The stockholders' equity section of the Company contains the following classes of capital stock as of June 30, 2011:
 
 Common stock, $ 0.0001 par value: 200,000,000 shares authorized; 94,869,018 shares issued and outstanding.
 
 Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value: 25,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding.
 
 Common Stock
 
 On December 21, 2009, the board of directors declared a dividend of an additional 11.2 shares of its common stock on each share of its common stock outstanding on December 21, 2009.
 
 On December 24, 2009, the Company entered into the Exchange with Green Energy and the shareholders of Green Energy.  The shareholders of Green Energy transferred all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Green Energy in exchange for the right to receive one share of American Energy common stock for each share of Green Energy common stock.  Accordingly, an aggregate of 28,788,252 shares of American Energy common stock were issued to the shareholders of Green Energy.
 
 On December 24, 2009, the Company sold in a private placement a total of 9,300,000 shares of common stock to 16 individuals for cash in the amount of $0.15 per share for a total $1,395,000.
 
 On December 24, 2009, Julie Carter resigned as sole officer and director of the company and the Company transferred all of the outstanding capital stock of SplitCo to Julie Carter in exchange for the cancellation of 15,250,000 shares of American Energy common stock that she owned.
 
 On March 19, 2010, the Company granted 350,000 shares of our common stock to Randall Reneau in consideration for his services as the Company's then-Chairman of the Board of Directors.  During the quarter ended September 30, 2010 these shares were issued.Randall Reneau served as Chairman from March 19, 2010 until his resignation on November 9, 2010.
 
 On April 26, 2010, the Company entered into a purchase and royalty agreement whereby the Company purchased a 100% interest in certain 86 unpatented lode mining claims located in Mohave County, Arizona.  The purchase price of these mining claims was $65,000 in cash and 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.85 per share or $170,000, and as of March 31, 2011, these shares have not been issued. These shares were issued in July 2011.
  19
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 NOTE 6 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (continued)
 
 The Company executed an investor relations agreement in July 2010 pursuant to which it is required to issue 2,000,000 shares of common stock to the consultant in consideration for certain investor relation services. The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.46 per share or $920,000. Accordingly, the Company recognized stock based consulting expense of $920,000.
 
 On September 1, 2010, the Company entered into consulting agreements with four consultants whereby the Company agreed to issue an aggregate of 800,000 shares of its common stock (200,000 shares per consultant) in consideration for certain services related to business development, financial management and communications. The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.60 per share or $480,000. Accordingly, the Company recognized stock based consulting expense of $480,000.
 
 Between October 15, 2010 and December 3, 2010, the Company issued secured convertible promissory notes in theaggregate principal amount of $100,000. In connection with these convertible promissory notes, the Company granted 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant of $41,000(see Note 5). As of June 30, 2011, these shares have not been issued. These shares were issued in August 2011.
 
 On December 29, 2010 the holder of $50,000 worth of convertible promissory note exercised its right under the note agreement to have the outstanding principal of and accrued interest on such note converted into similar securities offered in the private placement held in December 2010. Convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 (plus $416 in accrued interest) converted into 100,833 Units in the private placement on December 29, 2010. Such units include 100,833 shares of the Company’s common stock and five year warrant to purchase 100,833 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. Additionally, the Company recognized additional debt discount of $35,000 from the conversion of $50,000 into similar securities offered in the private placement/qualified financing and such debt discount was amortized in December 2010.
 
 On December 3, 2010, the Company sold an aggregate of 200,000 units for $0.50 per unit pursuant to a private placement for net proceeds of $100,000. In connection with this private placement, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock and 200,000 warrants exercisable at a price of $0.50 per share underlying the units. The purchase warrants expire in five years from the date of the warrant.The units were sold to Joshua Bleak, the Company’s President and Daniel Bleak, the Company’s director.
 
 As further consideration for the sale of the 4,000,000 Units above, the Company and the Investors entered into a registration rights agreement pursuant to which the Company has agreed to file a “resale” registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) covering all shares of the Company’s common stock included within the Units sold in the Offering and underlying any Warrants as well as the shares underlying the warrants issued to the placement agent.  The Company will maintain the effectiveness of the “resale” registration statement from the effective date until the later of; (i) the expiration date of the Warrants; (ii) the date on which the Warrants may be exercised on a "cashless" or "net exercise" basis; or (iii) the Cancellation Date (as defined in the Warrants), unless all securities registered under the registration statement have been sold or are otherwise able to be sold pursuant to Rule 144. The Company has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to have the registration statement declared effective within 180 days.The Company is obligated to pay to investors in the Offering a fee of 1% per month of the investors’ investment, payable in cash, up to a maximum of 6%, for each month in excess of the Effectiveness Deadline that the registration statement has not been declared effective; provided, however, that the Company shall not be obligated to pay any such liquidated damages if the Company is unable to fulfill its registration obligations as a result of rules, regulations, positions or releases issued or actions taken by the SEC pursuant to its authority with respect to “Rule 415”, provided the Company registers at such time the maximum number of shares of common stock permissible upon consultation with the staff of the SEC.
 
 Between February 18, 2011 to March 7, 2011, the Company sold in a private placement a total of 31,839,930 units to certain investors at a purchase price of $0.50 per unit, with each unit consisting of (i) one share of the Company’s common stock per value $0.0001 per share and (ii) a five (5) year warrant to purchase one share of the Company’s common stock at a per share exercise price of $0.50. The Company sold units consisting of an aggregate of 31,839,930shares of common stock and granted 31,839,930warrants to investors exercisable at a price of $0.50 per share for net proceeds of $14,332,600. The purchase warrants expire in five years from the date of the warrant. In connection with these private placements, the Company paid in cash private placement commissions and broker fees of approximately $1,452,365 and legal fees of $135,000.The placement agent also received 6,367,986 warrants as compensation for serving as placement agent which are exercisable at a price of $.50 per share and expire in five years from the date of the warrant.
  20
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
  NOTE 6 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (continued)
 
 As further consideration for the sale of the 31,839,930Units above, the Company and the Investors entered into a registration rights agreement, pursuant to which the Company has agreed to file a “resale” registration statement with the SEC covering all shares of the Common Stock sold in the Offering and underlying any Warrants, as well as Common Stock underlying the warrants issued to the placement agent(s) within 60 days.  The Company has agreed to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement from the effective date until all securities have been sold or are otherwise able to be sold pursuant to Rule 144. The Company has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to have the registration statement declared effective within 120 days. The Company is obligated to pay to Investors a fee of 1% per month of the Investors’ investment, payable in cash, for every thirty (30) day period up to a maximum of 6%, (i) following the Filing Date that the registration statement has not been filed and (ii) following the Effectiveness Deadline that the registration statement has not been declared effective; provided, however, that the Company shall not be obligated to pay any such liquidated damages if the Company is unable to fulfill its registration obligations as a result of rules, regulations, positions or releases issued or actions taken by the SEC pursuant to its authority with respect to “Rule 415”, provided the Company registers at such time the maximum number of shares of common stock permissible upon consultation with the staff of the SEC
 
 On March 17, 2011, the Company entered into Membership Interests Sale Agreements with Prospect Uranium Inc., a Nevada corporation and Gordon R. Haworth for the purchase of 51.35549% and 24.32225% of the membership interests of Secure Energy LLC, a North Dakota limited liability company.The Company paid $60,000 cash and issued 2,725,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Prospect and assumed certain obligations and liabilities of Prospect in the approximate amount of $80,000, and issued 975,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Haworth.Upon closing of this transaction on March 17, 2011, Secure Energy became a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company.The purchase consideration included $60,000 in cash and 3.7 million shares of the Company’s stock valued at the fair market value on the date of grant of $0.80 per share or $2,960,000 thus a total purchase price of $3,020,000.
 
 On December 28, 2010, the Company and an affiliated consulting company entered into a 9 month investor and public relations consulting agreement in consideration for a consulting fee of $200,000. In March 2011, this agreement was amended pursuant to which the consulting fee was amended to 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and a cash payment of $275,000 from $200,000. On June 14, 2011, the Company appointed to the board of directors of the Company, Jonathan Braun, who is the President of the affiliated consulting company. The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $1.24 per share or $744,000. The Company has recognized stock based consulting expense of $248,000 during fiscal year ended March 31, 2011. Additionally, the Company recognized stock based consulting expense of $248,000 and prepaid expense of $248,000 in connection with the 600,000 shares during the three months ended June 30, 2011. These shares were issued in April 2011.
 
 On April 8, 2011, the Company entered into a 90 day consulting agreement whereby the Company agreed to issue 750,000 shares of its common stock in consideration for certain services related to investor relations. The Company valued these common shares at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.59 per share or $442,500.The Company recognized stock based consulting expense of $408,083 and prepaid expense of $34,417 during the three months ended June 30, 2011.
 
 As of June 30, 2011, the Company had 94,869,018 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and 250,000 shares of common stock to be issued.
 
 Common Stock Options
 
 On April 1, 2010, shareholders representing a majority of the voting shares of the Company approved the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) and reserved 7,500,000 shares of Common stock for issuance pursuant to awards under the Plan. The Plan is intended as an incentive, to retain in the employ of, and as directors, officers, consultants, advisors and employees of the Company, persons of training, experience and ability, to attract new directors, officers, consultants, advisors and employees whose services are considered valuable, to encourage the sense of proprietorship and to stimulate the active interest of such persons in the development and financial success of the Company and its subsidiaries
 
 On March 19, 2010, the Company granted 750,000 10-year options to purchase shares of common stock at $0.25 per share to a former officer of the Company which was subject to a vesting schedule based on the recipient's continued employment. The 750,000 options were valued on the grant date at $0.15 per option or a total of $112,500 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.15 per share (based on recent sales of the Company’s common stock in a private placement), volatility of 237% (estimated using volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 3.70%.
  21
 Table of Contents
 CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
  NOTE 6 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (continued)
 
 On April 1, 2010, the Company granted an aggregate of 2,350,000 10-year options to purchase shares of common stock at $0.25 per share to three officers and one employee of the Company which are subject to a vesting schedule based on the recipient's continued employment. The 2,350,000 options were valued on the grant date at $0.15 per option or a total of $352,500 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.15 per share (based on recent sales of the Company’s common stock in a private placement), volatility of 236% (estimated using volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 3.89%.
 
 On October 6, 2010, the Company granted 150,000 10-year options to purchase shares of common stock at $0.25 per share to a director of the Company which is subject to a vesting schedule based on the recipient's continued employment. The 150,000 options were valued on the grant date at $0.77 per option or a total of $115,500 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.77 per share, volatility of 239% (estimated using volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 2.41%.
 
 For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $46,800. At June 30, 2011, there was $268,850 of total unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested option-based compensation arrangements under the 2010 Plan.
 
 On April 1, 2010, the Company granted an aggregate of 1,000,000 10-year options to purchase shares of common stock at $0.25 per share to three consultants which are subject to a vesting schedule based on the recipient's continued service. The 1,000,000 options were valued on the grant date at $0.15 per option or a total of $150,000 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.15 per share (based on recent sales of the Company’s common stock in a private placement), volatility of 236% (estimated using volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 3.89%.
 
 On October 1, 2010, the Company granted 60,000 10-year options to purchase shares of common stock at $0.25 per share to a consultant which is subject to a vesting schedule based on the recipient's continued service. The 60,000 options were valued on the grant date at $0.75 per option or a total of $45,000 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.77 per share, volatility of 239% (estimated using volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 10 years, and a risk free interest rate of 2.54%.
 
 For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded stock-based consulting expense of $27,000 on options granted.
 
 During the three months ended June 30, 2011, 375,000 options were forfeited in accordance with the termination of employee and consultant relationships. A summary of the stock options as of June 30, 2011 and changes during the period are presented below:
 Number of Options


Weighted Average Exercise Price


Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)Balance at June 30, 2010


3,185,000


$
0.25



9.50Granted


-



-



-Exercised


-



-



-Forfeited


(375,000
)


-



-Balance outstanding at June 30, 2011


2,810,000


$
0.25



9.25Options vested and exercisable at June 30, 2011


1,082,000


$
0.25Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period





$
-
 
 Stock options outstanding at June 30, 2011as disclosed in the above table have no intrinsic value due to the exercise price is higher than the trading price of the Company’s common stock.
  22
 Table of Contents
 CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
  NOTE 6 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (continued)
 
 Common Stock Warrants
 
 In December 2009, in connection with the sale of the Company’s common shares, the Company granted 4,650,000 warrants to investors exercisable at a price of $0.40 per share. The purchase warrants expire in two years from the date of the warrant.
 
 In December 2010, in connection with the sale of the Company’s common shares, the Company granted 4,200,000 warrants to investors exercisable at a price of $0.50 per share. The purchase warrants expire in five years from the date of the warrant. The placement agent also received 800,000 warrants as compensation for serving as placement agent which are exercisable at a price of $.50 per share and expire in five years from the date of the warrant.
 
 On December 29, 2010 the holder of $50,000 worth of convertible promissory note elected to have the outstanding principal of and accrued interest on such note, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, exchanged into the private placement held in December 2010. Convertible promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $50,000 (plus $416 in accrued interest) converted into 100,833 Units in the private placement on December 29, 2010. Such units include 100,833 shares of the Company’s common stock and a five year warrant to purchase 100,833 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.
 
 Between February 2011 and March 2011, in connection with the sale of the Company’s common shares, the Company granted 31,839,930 warrants to investors exercisable at a price of $0.50 per share. The purchase warrants expire in five years from the date of the warrant. The placement agent also received 6,367,986 warrants as compensation for serving as placement agent which are exercisable at a price of $.50 per share and expire in five years from the date of the warrant.
 
 On February 1, 2011, the Company granted 4,000,000 5-year warrants to purchase shares of common stock at $0.50 per share to a consultant in connection with an 11 month consulting agreement. The 4,000,000 warrants were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.68 per warrant or a total of approximately $2,713,000 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.69 per share, volatility of 206% (estimated using volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 5 years, and a risk free interest rate of 2.02%. The Company has recognized stock based consulting expense of $493,206 during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011. Additionally, the Company recognized stock based consulting expense of $739,809 and prepaid expense of $1,479,617 during the three months ended June 30, 2011.
 
 A summary of the status of the Company's outstanding stock warrants as of June 30, 2011 and changes during the period then ended is as follows:
  Number of Warrants


Weighted Average Exercise PriceBalance at March 31, 2011


51,958,749


$
0.49Granted


-



-Exercised/Forfeited


-



-Balance at June 30, 2011


51,958,749


$
0.49Warrants exercisable at June 30, 2011


51,958,749


$
0.49Weighted average fair value of options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2011





$
-
  23
 Table of Contents
 CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 
 NOTE 6 - STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (continued)
 
 The following table summarizes information about stock warrants outstanding at June 30, 2011:
 
 Warrants Outstanding and ExercisableRange of Exercise Price


Number Outstanding at June 30, 2011


Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life

Weighted Average Exercise Price$
0.40



4,650,000


0.50 Year

$
0.400.50



47,308,749


4.64 Years


0.5051,958,749




$
0.49
 
 NOTE 7 - ACQUISITION OF SECURE ENERGY LLC
 
 On March 17, 2011, the Company entered into Membership Interests Sale Agreements with Prospect Uranium Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Prospect”) and Gordon R. Haworth (“Haworth”) for the purchase of 51.35549% and 24.32225% of the membership interests of Secure Energy LLC, a North Dakota limited liability company (“Secure Energy”). The Company paid $60,000 cash and issued 2,725,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Prospect and assumed certain obligations and liabilities of Prospect in the approximate amount of $80,000, and issued 975,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Haworth. Upon closing of this transaction on March 17, 2011, Secure Energy became a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company.
 
 The purchase consideration included $60,000 in cash and 3.7 million shares of the Company’s stock valued at the fair market value on the date of grant at $0.80 per share thus a total purchase price of $3,020,000.
 
 The Company accounted for the acquisition utilizing the purchase method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805 “Business Combinations”. The Company is the acquirer for accounting purposes and Secure Energy is the acquired company.  Accordingly, the Company applied push–down accounting and adjusted to fair value all of the assets and liabilities directly on the financial statements of the subsidiary, Secure Energy. The net purchase price paid by the Company, was allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the records of the Company as follows:
 
 Current assets (including cash of $41)

$
10,008Prepaid expenses – long term portion


45,651Goodwill


3,065,014Liabilities assumed (including a 12% note payable of $50,000)


(100,673
)Net purchase price

$
3,020,000
 
 Prepaid expenses – long term portion acquired consist primarily of costs paid for future mineral lease payments after one year in connection with three Uranium lease agreements dated in year 2007. Such prepaid cost is associated with lease payments for year 2013 to 2017.
 
 During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded an impairment of goodwill of $3,065,014 associated with the acquisition of Secure Energy. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Secure Energy has not generated future cash flows and has not generated revenues since its inception, has incurred losses and cash used in operations, management deemed the acquired goodwill to be impaired and wrote-off the goodwill on the acquisition date.
  24
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
  NOTE 7 - ACQUISITION OF SECURE ENERGY LLC (continued)
 
 Unaudited pro forma results of operations data as if the Company and Secure Energy had occurred are as follows:
 
 The Company and Secure Energy for the three months endedJune 30, 2011


The Company and Secure Energy for the three months endedJune 30, 2010


The Company and Secure Energy from November 23, 2009 (Inception date) to June 30, 2011Pro forma revenues

$
-


$
-


$
-Pro forma loss from operations


(2,623,732
)


(323,081
)


(10,967,159
)Pro forma net loss


(2,616,982
)


(322,362
)


(11,039,436
)Pro forma loss per share

$
(0.03
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.18
)Pro forma diluted loss per share

$
(0.03
)

$
(0.01
)

$
(0.18
)
  Pro forma data does not purport to be indicative of the results that would have been obtained had these events actually occurred and is not intended to be a projection of future results.
 
 NOTE 8 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
 On December 3, 2010, the Company sold an aggregate of 200,000 units for $0.50 per unit pursuant to a private placement for net proceeds of $100,000 to Joshua Bleak, the Company’s President and Daniel Bleak, the Company’s director.In connection with this private placement, the Company issued 200,000 shares of common stock and 200,000 warrants exercisable at a price of $0.50 per share underlying the units.
 
 During the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company paid rent of $7,500 on a facility lease by an affiliated company for which our CEO/director, is the President. In April 2010, the Company entered into a month to month lease agreement whereby the rent for this office space is $1,500 per month.  In June 2010, the rent was increased to $2,500 per month due to the lease of additional space.
 
 On April 26, 2010, the Company entered into a purchase and royalty agreement with an affiliated company for which our Director, Daniel Bleak is the President. The Company purchased a 100% interest in certain 86 unpatented lode mining claims located in Mohave County, Arizona.  The purchase price of these mining claims was $65,000 in cash and 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued on the date of grant at $0.85 per share or $170,000.The Company will pay a 3% net smelter returns royalty on all uranium sales. The Company shall have the right to reduce the royalty from 3% to 0% by paying the aggregate sum of $1,500,000 ($500,000 for each 1%).
 
 On December 28, 2010, the Company and an affiliated consulting company entered into a 9 month investor and public relations consulting agreement in consideration for a consulting fee of $200,000. In March 2011, this agreement was amended pursuant to which the consulting fee was amended to 600,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued on the date of grant at $1.24 per share or $744,000 and a cash payment of $275,000 from $200,000. On June 14, 2011, the Company appointed to the board of directors of the Company, Jonathan Braun, who is the President of the affiliated consulting company.
 
 For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $9,000 in accounting fees to a director of the Company, Bill Allred, which has been included in professional and consulting expenses on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
 
 For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company incurred $30,000 in consulting fees to a director of the Company, Danny Bleak, which has been included in professional and consulting expenses on the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
  25
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 NOTE 8 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
 
 On March 1, 2011, in connection with a consulting agreement, the Company agreed to issue 4,000,000 10-year options to purchase shares of common stock to an affiliated company for which our Director, Daniel Bleak is the President, and advance $50,000 in cash based on the consulting agreement. On March 31, 2011, the Company entered into a termination agreement, whereby both parties agreed, that the Company has no obligation to pay any portion of the consulting fee of $50,000 and 4,000,000 options and that immediately upon execution of this termination agreement, the affiliated company shall return the advance of $50,000 to the Company.
 
 NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS
 
 Uranium Lease Agreements
 
 In connection with the execution of the Membership Interests Sale Agreements of Secure Energy LLC, the Company acquired the following Uranium lease agreements:
 
 1)
Slope County, North Dakota, Lease 1 and 2
 
 On June 28, 2007, the Company’s majority owned subsidiary, Secure Energy, LLC, signed a 20 year mining lease to develop and operate 472.8 acres of uranium mining properties in the Slope County, North Dakota. The Company prepaid the annual payment of $10 per net acre for eight years amounting to $36,717 at the date of signing. The Company will pay a production royalty of $0.75 per pound of all uranium sales.
 
 2)
Slope County, North Dakota, Lease 3
 
 On November 23, 2007, the Company’s majority owned subsidiary, Secure Energy, LLC signed a 10 year mining lease, with right to extend an additional 10 years to develop and operate 554.24 acres of uranium mining properties in the Slope County, North Dakota. The Company prepaid the annual payment of $10 per net acre for ten years amounting to $53,775 at the date of signing. The Company will pay a production royalty of $0.75 per pound of all uranium sales or 5% of net proceeds from the sale of uranium bearing ores.
 
 Royalty agreements
 
 On April 26, 2010, the Company entered into a purchase and royalty agreement with an affiliated company for which our Director, Daniel Bleak is the President. The Company purchased a 100% interest in certain 86 unpatented lode mining claims located in Mohave County, Arizona.  The purchase price of these mining claims was $65,000 in cash and 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company will pay a 3% net smelter returns royalty on all uranium sales. The Company shall have the right to reduce the royalty from 3% to 0% by paying the aggregate sum of $1,500,000 ($500,000 for each 1%).
 
 On May 27, 2011, the Company entered into purchase and sale agreement (the “Agreement”) with Absaroka Stone LLC (“Absaroka”) pursuant to which the Company has agreed to purchase certain unpatented mining claims commonly known as the “Uinta County (Carnotite) Uranium Prospect” located in the Uinta County of Wyoming (the “Property” and the transaction, the “Mining Purchase”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Absaroka agreed not to stake for its own account any additional mining claims within a fifteen mile radius of the Property.  Any additional mining claims to be located within the fifteen (15) mile radius of the Property (the “Claim Body”) shall be located, staked and filed by the Company, at the Company’s expense and held in the Company’s name.  In consideration for the purchase of the Property, the Company paid Absaroka $15,000 upon execution of the Agreement.  Additionally, the Company agreed to spend a minimum of $200,000 relating to location, maintenance, exploration, development or equipping any one or more of the mining claims that comprise the Claim Body for commercial production within 24 months from the date of the Agreement.  If the Company fails to incur a minimum of $200,000 in expenses related to the foregoing within 24 months, the Company shall pay an aggregate sum of $50,000 to Absaroka. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company agrees to pay a 1% gross royalty (the “Royalty Payment”) to Absaroka on any revenues derived from the sale of all uranium-vanadium, gold, silver, copper and rare earth ores or concentrates produced from the Claim Body, up to an aggregate of $1,000,000.  The Company has the option to eliminate the obligation of the Royalty Payment by paying Absaroka an aggregate payment of $1,000,000.
  26
 Table of Contents
  CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 (FORMERLY AMERCAN ENERGY FIELDS, INC.)
 (AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)
 NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 June 30, 2011
 NOTE 10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
 As of June 30, 2011, the Company had 250,000 shares of common stock to be issued. These shares were issued between July 2011 and August 2011.
 
 On July 22, 2011, the Company, Sagebrush Gold Ltd (“Sage”) and Continental Resources Acquisition Sub, Inc., Sage’s wholly owned subsidiary (“Acquisition Sub”), entered into an asset purchase agreement (the “Agreement”) pursuant to which Acquisition Sub purchased substantially all of the assets of the Company (the “Asset Sale”) in consideration for (i) shares of Sage’s common stock (the “Shares”) which shall be equal to eight (8) Shares for every ten (10) shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding; (ii) the assumption of the outstanding warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock such that Sage shall deliver to the holders of the Company’s warrants, warrants to purchase shares of Sage’s common stock (the “Warrants”) which shall be equal to one  Warrant to purchase eight (8) shares of Sage’s common stock for every warrant to purchase ten (10) shares the Company’s common stock outstanding at an exercise price equal to such amount as is required pursuant to the terms of the outstanding warrants, and (iii)  the assumption of the Company’s  2010 Equity Incentive Plan and all options granted and issued thereunder such that Sage shall deliver to the Company’s option holders, options (the “Options”) to purchase an aggregate of such number of shares of Sage’s common stock issuable under Sage’s equity incentive plan which shall be equal to one  option to purchase eight (8) shares of Sage’s common stock for every option to purchase ten (10) shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding with a strike price equal to such amount as is required pursuant to the terms of the outstanding option.  The exercise price of the Warrants and the strike price and Options shall be determined and certified by an officer of Sage.  Upon the closing of the Asset Sale, Acquisition Sub will assume the Assumed Liabilities (as defined in the Agreement) of the Company.  As of August 22, 2011, the Shares discussed above have not been issued.
 
 Under the terms of the Agreement, Sage purchased from the Company substantially all of the Company’s assets, including, but not limited to, 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (CPX Uranium, Inc., Green Energy Fields, Inc., and ND Energy, Inc.) as defined in the agreement.  The acquired assets include approximately $13 million of cash.
 
 A majority of the stockholders of the Company approved the Agreement by written consent on or about July 21, 2011. There can be no assurance that the transaction will be tax free to any particular stockholder or the ability or timing of receipt of all approvals necessary to liquidate.  The Agreement constitutes a plan of reorganization within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.368-2(g) and constitutes a plan of liquidation of the Company.  The Company is expected to liquidate on or prior to July 1, 2012.  Sage has agreed to file a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) in connection with liquidation of the Company no later than thirty (30) days following the later of the closing date of the Asset Sale or such date that the Company delivers to Sage its audited financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2011.  The Company will subsequently distribute the registered Shares to its shareholders as part of its liquidation.  Sage agreed to use its best efforts to cause such registration to be declared effective within twelve months following the closing date of the Asset Sale.  Sage has agreed to pay liquidated damages of 1% per month, up to a maximum of 5%, in the event that Sage fails to file or is unable to cause the registration statement to be declared effective.
 
 On July 18, 2011, the Company purchased an unsecured 6% promissory note (the “Note”) from Sage for an aggregate purchase price of $2,000,000. The Note matures six (6) months from the date of issuance.
  27
 Table of Contents
  ITEM2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
 
 FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
 Some of the statements contained in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are "forward-looking statements" which can be identified by the use of terminology such as "estimates," "projects," "plans," "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," or the negative or other variations, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. We urge you to be cautious of the forward-looking statements, that such statements, which are contained in this Form 10-Q, reflect our current beliefs with respect to future events and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors affecting our operations, market growth, services, products and licenses. No assurances can be given regarding the achievement of future results, as actual results may differ materially as a result of the risks we face, and actual events may differ from the assumptions underlying the statements that have been made regarding anticipated events.
 
 All written forward-looking statements made in connection with this Form 10-Q that are attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Given the uncertainties that surround such statements, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
 
 The safe harbors of forward-looking statements provided by the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 are unavailable to issuers not subject to the reporting requirements set forth under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As we have not registered our securities pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act, such safe harbors set forth under the Reform Act are unavailable to us.
 
 OVERVIEW
 
 Continental Resources Group, Inc. (“we” or the “Company”) formerly American Energy Fields, Inc. was incorporated as Sienna Resources, Inc. in the State of Delaware on July 20, 2007 to engage in the acquisition, exploration and development of natural resource properties.  On December 21, 2009, we had filed an Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware in order to change our name to “American Energy Fields, Inc.”, change our authorized capital to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 25,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share and create “blank check” preferred stock. On June 28, 2011, the Company changed its name to Continental Resources Group, Inc. from “American Energy Fields, Inc.
 
 On December 24, 2009, we entered into the Exchange with Green Energy and the shareholders of Green Energy, which caused Green Energy to become our wholly-owned subsidiary. Green Energy was formed on November 23, 2009.
 
 We are primarily engaged, through our operating subsidiary, Green Energy, in the acquisition and exploration of properties that may contain uranium mineralization in the United States. Our target properties are those that have been the subject of historical exploration.  We have acquired State Leases and Federal unpatented mining claims in the states of Arizona and California for the purpose of exploration and potential development of uranium minerals on a total of approximately 7,200 acres.  Our properties do not have any reserves.
 
 On April 26, 2010, we acquired a 100% interest (minus a 3% net smelter royalty interest) in 86 unpatented lode mining claims, located in Mohave County, Arizona, known as the Artillery Peak Property.  The Artillery Peak Property lies within the Date Creek Basin, which is a region well known for significant uranium occurrence.  A number of companies performed exploration drilling at the Artillery Peak Property in the 1950s through 1970s, and most recently in 2007, indicating substantial uranium mineralization and identifying targets for future exploration.  The uranium anomalies are found primarily within the Artillery Peak Formation, a lacustrine sandstone rock unit.
 
 The Company released a technical report on October 12, 2010 formatted according to Canadian National Instrument 43-101 standards prepared by Dr. Karen Wenrich, an expert on uranium mineralization in the southwestern United States, and Allen Wells, who performed a mineral resource estimate (as defined by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum) based on historical data and the recent 2007 data.  As recommended in the technical report, the Company expects to develop plans to conduct exploration drilling to further delineate the extent and nature of the uranium mineralization at the Artillery Peak Property.  At the Coso Property, uranium anomalies targeted by previous exploration will be relocated and re-identified by the Company for further evaluation. If feasible, old drill holes in prospective areas will be re-entered and logged by down-hole radiometric probes to identify zones and grades or subsurface uranium mineralization.
  28
 Table of Contents
  At the Blythe uranium property, the Company proposes to locate and re-enter as many old drill holes as possible. These holes will be probed with Geophysical instruments to determine radioactivity and uranium mineralization in the surfaces. If these results are positive, then additional drilling and down hole probing will be proposed.
 
 Our principal executive offices are located at 3266 W. Galveston Drive, Suite 101 Apache Junction, Arizona 95120. Our telephone number is 480-288-6530.
 
 Recent Developments
 
 On July 22, 2011, the Company, Sagebrush Gold Ltd (“Sage”) and Continental Resources Acquisition Sub, Inc., Sage’s wholly owned subsidiary (“Acquisition Sub”), entered into an asset purchase agreement the (“Agreement”) pursuant to which Acquisition Sub purchased substantially all of the assets of the Company (the “Asset Sale”) in consideration for (i) shares of Sage’s common stock (the “Shares”) which shall be equal to eight (8) Shares for every ten (10) shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding; (ii) the assumption of the outstanding warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock such that Sage shall deliver to the holders of the Company’s warrants, warrants to purchase shares of Sage’s common stock (the “Warrants”) which shall be equal to one  Warrant to purchase eight (8) shares of Sage’s common stock for every warrant to purchase ten (10) shares the Company’s common stock outstanding at an exercise price equal to such amount as is required pursuant to the terms of the outstanding warrants, and (iii)  the assumption of the Company’s  2010 Equity Incentive Plan and all options granted and issued thereunder such that Sage shall deliver to the Company’s option holders, options (the “Options”) to purchase an aggregate of such number of shares of Sage’s common stock issuable under Sage’s equity incentive plan which shall be equal to one  option to purchase eight (8) shares of Sage’s common stock for every option to purchase ten (10) shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding with a strike price equal to such amount as is required pursuant to the terms of the outstanding option.  The exercise price of the Warrants and the strike price and Options shall be determined and certified by an officer of Sage.  Upon the closing of the Asset Sale, Acquisition Sub assumed certain liabilities of the Company.  The Asset Sale is intended to be tax-free for federal income tax purposes and constitutes a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder.
 
 Under the terms of the Agreement, Sage purchased from the Company substantially all of the Company’s assets, including, but not limited to, 100% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries (CPX Uranium, Inc., Green Energy Fields, Inc., and ND Energy, Inc.).  The acquired assets include approximately $13 million of cash.  Under the terms of the Agreement Sage acquired:
 
 (i)
state leases and federal unpatented mining claims and other rights to exploration, as owned as of the date hereof; all stock in subsidiaries, membership, joint venture, partnership and similar interests and claims, all royalty rights and claims, and all deposits, prepayments and refunds;
 
 (ii)
all contracts;
 
 (iii)
all cash and cash equivalents;
 
 (iv)
all accounts or notes receivable held by the Company;
 
 (v)
all books and records, including, but not limited to, books of account, ledgers and general, financial and accounting records, price lists, distribution lists, supplier lists, sales material and records;
 
 (vi)
all furniture, fixtures, equipment, machinery, tools, office equipment, supplies, computers and other tangible personal property;
 
 (vii)
all rights, claims and causes of action against third parties resulting from or relating to the operation of the Company’s business and the assets purchased under the Agreement prior to the date of closing, including without limitation, any rights, claims and causes of actions arising under warranties from vendors, patent or trademark infringement claims, insurance and other third parties and the proceeds thereof; and
 
 (viii)
all Intellectual Property, goodwill associated therewith, licenses and sublicenses granted and obtained with respect thereto, and rights thereunder, remedies against past, present, and future infringements thereof, and rights to protection of past, present, and future interests therein under the laws of all jurisdictions
  29
 Table of Contents
  A majority of the stockholders of the Company approved the Agreement by written consent on or about July 21, 2011. There can be no assurance that the transaction will be tax free to any particular stockholder or the ability or timing of receipt of all approvals necessary to liquidate. The Agreement constitutes a plan of reorganization within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.368-2(g) and constitutes a plan of liquidation of the Company. The Company is expected to liquidate on or prior to July 1, 2012. Sage has agreed to file a registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) in connection with liquidation of the Company no later than thirty (30) days following the later of the closing date of the Asset Sale or such date that the Company delivers to Sage its audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011. The Company will subsequently distribute the registered Shares to its shareholders as part of its liquidation. Sage agreed to use its best efforts to cause such registration to be declared effective within twelve months following the closing date of the Asset Sale. Sage has agree to pay liquidated damages of 1% per month, up to a maximum of 5%, in the event that Sage fails to file or is unable to cause the registration statement to be declared effective.
 
 Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
 The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Significant estimates made by management include, but are not limited to, the useful life of property and equipment, the fair values of certain promotional contracts and the assumptions used to calculate fair value of options granted and common stock issued for services.
 
 Management believes the following critical accounting policies affect the significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements.
 
 Principles of Consolidation
 
 The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and present the financial statements of the Company, our wholly-owned subsidiaries and a majority owned subsidiary. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
 
 Use of Estimates
 
 The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including, but not limited to, those related to investment tax credits, bad debts, income taxes and contingencies. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates made by management include, but are not limited to, the useful life of property and equipment, the assumptions used to calculate stock-based compensation, and debt discount and common stock issued for services.
 
 Stock-Based Compensation
 
 Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the consolidated financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award.
 
 Pursuant to ASC Topic 505-50, for share-based payments to consultants and other third-parties, compensation expense is determined at the “measurement date.” The expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date.
  30
 Table of Contents
  Property and Equipment
 
 Property and equipment are carried at cost. The cost of repairs and maintenance is expensed as incurred; major replacements and improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gains or losses are included in income in the year of disposition. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets, generally three to seven years.
 
 Mineral Property Acquisition and Exploration Costs
 
 Costs of lease, acquisition, exploration, carrying and retaining unproven mineral lease properties are expensed as incurred. The Company has chosen to expense all mineral acquisition and exploration costs as incurred given that it is still in the exploration stage. Once the Company has identified proven and probable reserves in its investigation of its properties and upon development of a plan for operating a mine, it would enter the development stage and capitalize future costs until production is established. When a property reaches the production stage, the related capitalized costs will be amortized, using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable-proven reserves. When the Company has capitalized mineral properties, these properties will be periodically assessed for impairment of value and any diminution in value.To date, the Company has not established the commercial feasibility of any exploration prospects; therefore, all costs are being expensed.
 
 Long-Lived Assets
 
 We review for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable, pursuant to guidance established in ASC 360-10-35-15, “Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. We recognize an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of impairment is measured as the difference between the asset’s estimated fair value and its book value.
 
 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
 In January 2010, the Company adopted FASB ASU No. 2010-06,Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures (Topic 820) - Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). These standards require new disclosures on the amount and reason for transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 fair value measurements. The standards also require new disclosures of activities, including purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements within the Level 3 fair value measurements. The standard also clarifies existing disclosure requirements on levels of disaggregation and disclosures about inputs and valuation techniques. These new disclosures are effective beginning with the first interim filing in 2010.  The disclosures about the roll-forward of information in Level 3 are required for the Company with its first interim filing in 2011. The adoption of ASU No. 2010-06 did not have a material impact on the results of operations and financial condition.
 
 In February 2010, the FASB issued an amendment to the accounting standards related to the accounting for, and disclosure of, subsequent events in an entity’s consolidated financial statements. This standard amends the authoritative guidance for subsequent events that was previously issued and among other things exempts Securities and Exchange Commission registrants from the requirement to disclose the date through which it has evaluated subsequent events for either original or restated financial statements. This standard does not apply to subsequent events or transactions that are within the scope of other applicable GAAP that provides different guidance on the accounting treatment for subsequent events or transactions. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
 
 In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20,Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.   ASU 2010-20 requires additional disclosures about the credit quality of a company’s loans and the allowance for loan losses held against those loans.  Companies will need to disaggregate new and existing disclosures based on how it develops its allowance for loan losses and how it manages credit exposures.  Additional disclosure is also required about the credit quality indicators of loans by class at the end of the reporting period, the aging of past due loans, information about troubled debt restructurings, and significant purchases and sales of loans during the reporting period by class.  The new guidance is effective for interim- and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010.  The Company anticipates that adoption of these additional disclosures will not have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
 
 Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption.
  31
 Table of Contents
  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
 Our business began on November 23, 2009.We are still in our exploration stage and have generated no revenues to date.
 
 We incurred operating expenses of $2,624,671 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to $321,536 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.  The overall increase of $2,303,135 in operating expenses is primarily attributable to the fact that we were in our early stages of our operations during the prior period. These expenses primarily consisted of general expenses, compensation, consulting and professional fees incurred in connection with the day to day operation of our business and the preparation and filing of our financial disclosure reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The operating expenses consisted of the following:
 
 For the Three 
Months Ended

June 30, 2011


For the Three 
Months Ended

June 30, 2010Exploration costs

$
22,371


$
26,693Professional fees


95,657



18,503Advertising and marketing


20,673



14,405Compensation expense and related taxes


202,575



90,976Consulting fees


2,000,250



82,117Rent


7,500



17,848Travel  and related expenses


75,244



9,444Other general and administrative


200,401



61,550Total

$
2,624,671


$
321,536
 
 •
Explorations costs:  For the three months ended June 30, 2011, exploration costs were $22,371, a decrease of $4,322, which includes costs of lease, acquisition, exploration, carrying and retaining unproven mineral lease properties. The Company has chosen to expense all mineral acquisition and exploration costs as incurred given that it is still in the exploration stage.•
Professional fees: For the three months ended June 30, 2011, professional fees were $95,657 which includes fees incurred for audits and legal fees related to public company filing requirements compared to $18,503 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The overall increase of $77,154 in professional fees is primarily attributable to an increase in legal fees related to public company filing requirements  and  due to the fact that we were in our early stages of our operations during the prior period. Additionally, we paid management fee of $15,000 in June 2011 to MJI Resource Management Corp.for the purpose of performing management, operations, legal, accounting, and resource location services.•
Compensation expense and related taxes: Compensation expense includes salaries and stock-based compensation to our employees. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, compensation expense and related taxes were $202,575 which includes the recognition of stock-based compensation expense of $46,800 which is attributable to stock options granted to our officers and employees compared to $90,976 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The overall increase in compensation of $111,599 is primarily attributableto the increase in full time employees and dueto the fact that we were in our early stages of our operations during the prior period.•
Consulting fees: For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we incurred consulting fees of $2,000,250, which were primarily attributable to the issuance of our common stock and stock warrants for services rendered to consultants for investor relations and advisory services of $1,395,892 and stock-based compensation expense of $27,000 which is attributable to stock options granted to consultants.   For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred consulting fees of $82,117.  The overall increase in consulting fees of $1,918,133 is primarily attributable to the amortization of cash prepayments of $364,561 in connection with consulting and investor relation agreements which were amortized over the term of its respective agreements.•
Rent: For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we incurred rent of $7,500, which were primarily attributable to rental fees of our principal executive offices in Apache Junction, Arizona. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we incurred rent of $17,848.  The decrease in rent expense of $10,348 is primarily attributable to a previous office space we rented in California during the three months ended June 30, 2010.  32
 Table of Contents
  •
Travel and related expenses: Travel expenses increased to $75,244 during the three months period June 30, 2011 from $9,444 during the three months ended June 30, 2010, due to increased conference campaign and business development related travel. Additionally, the overall increase in travel is primarily attributable to the fact that we were in our early stages of our operations during the prior period.•
Other general and administrative expenses: For the three months ended June 30, 2011 other general and administrative expenses were $200,401 which includes postage, general insurance, automobile, office supplies, utilities and office expenses. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, other general and administrative expenses were $61,550. The overall increase in general and administrative expenses of $138,851 is primarily attributable due to an increase in operations.
 Loss from operations
 
 We reported a loss from operations of $2,624,671 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to a loss from operations of $321,536 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
 
 Other Income (Expenses)
 
 Total other (expense) income was $6,750 and $719 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively and is primarily attributable to interest income of $8,250 in connection with bank balance of our savings account.
 
 Net loss
 
 We reported a net loss attributable to Continental Resources Group, Inc. of $2,617,921 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $320,817 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
 
 LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
 Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate funds to support its current and future operations, satisfy its obligations, and otherwise operate on an ongoing basis. At June 30, 2011, we had a cash balance of $13,275,207 and working capital of $15,390,129. We have been funding our operations though the issuance of notes payable and sale of units consisting of shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase shares of our common stock for operating capital purposes.  Our balance sheet at June 30, 2011 reflects note payable amounting to $50,000, which bears interest at 12% per annum.
 
 Our consolidated financial statements from inception (November 23, 2009) through the three months ended June 30, 2011 reported no revenues which is not sufficient to fund our operating expenses. At June 30, 2011, we had a cash balance of $13,275,207 and working capital of $15,390,129.   We estimate that based on current plans and assumptions, that our available cash will be sufficient to satisfy our cash requirements under our present operating expectations, without further financing, for up to 12 months. Other than our current working capital, we presently have no other alternative source of working capital. We do not have revenues to support our daily operations. We have raised significant additional capital to fund our future operating expenses, pay our obligations, and grow our Company. We do not anticipate we will be profitable in 2011.  We have met our liquidity and capital requirements for up to 12 months primarily through the private placement of equity securities that occurred between December 2010 and March 2011.
 
 Operating activities
 
 Net cash flows used in operating activities for the for the three months ended June 30, 2011 amounted to $1,080,524 and was primarily attributable to our net loss of $2,616,982, offset by depreciation of $3,312, amortization of prepaid services of $1,762,945, stock-based compensation of $73,800, impairment of mining rights of $15,000 and add back total changes in assets and liabilities of $317,660 and non-controlling interest of $939. This change in assets and liabilities is primarily attributable to an increase in prepaid expenses of $353,001.
 
 Net cash flows used in operating activities for the for the three months ended June 30, 2010 amounted to $307,963 and was primarily attributable to our net loss of $320,817, offset by depreciation of $1,325, and total changes in assets and liabilities of $11,529.
 
 Investing activities
 
 Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $27,721 and represented an acquisition of mining rights of $15,000 and the purchase of property and equipment of $12,721.
  33
 Table of Contents
  Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $84,330 and represented an acquisition of mining rights of $65,000 and the purchase of property and equipment of $19,330.
 
 Financing activities
 
 Net cash flows provided by financing activities was $0 for both the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
 
 Contractual Obligations
 
 We have certain fixed contractual obligations and commitments that include future estimated payments. Changes in our business needs, cancellation provisions, changing interest rates, and other factors may result in actual payments differing from the estimates. We cannot provide certainty regarding the timing and amounts of payments. We have presented below a summary of the most significant assumptions used in our determination of amounts presented in the tables, in order to assist in the review of this information within the context of our consolidated financial position, results of operation, and cash flows.
 
 The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2011, and the effect these obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods:
 
 Payments Due by PeriodTotal


Less than 1

year


1-3 Years


4-5

Years


5 Years

+Contractual Obligations:Note payable

$
50,000


$
50,000


$
-


$
-


$
-Uranium lease agreements


55,076



-



-



-



55,076Total Contractual Obligations

$
105,076


$
50,000


$
-


$
-


$
55,076
 
 Uranium Lease Agreements
 
 In connection with the execution of the Membership Interests Sale Agreements of Secure Energy LLC, we acquired the following Uranium lease agreements:
 
 1)
Slope County, North Dakota, Lease 1 and 2
 
 On June 28, 2007, our majority owned subsidiary, Secure Energy, LLC, signed a 20 year mining lease to develop and operate 472.8 acres of uranium mining properties in the Slope County, North Dakota. We prepaid the annual payment of $10 per net acre for eight years amounting to $36,717 at the date of signing. We will pay a production royalty of $0.75 per pound of all uranium sales.
 
 2)
Slope County, North Dakota, Lease 3
 
 On November 23, 2007, our majority owned subsidiary, Secure Energy, LLC signed a 10 year mining lease, with right to extend an additional 10 years to develop and operate 554.24 acres of uranium mining properties in the Slope County, North Dakota. We prepaid the annual payment of $10 per net acre for ten years amounting to $53,775 at the date of signing. We will pay a production royalty of $0.75 per pound of all uranium sales or 5% of net proceeds from the sale of uranium bearing ores.
 
 Royalty agreements
 
 On April 26, 2010, the Company entered into a purchase and royalty agreement with an affiliated company for which our Director, Daniel Bleak is the President. The Company purchased a 100% interest in certain 86 unpatented lode mining claims located in Mohave County, Arizona.  The purchase price of these mining claims was $65,000 in cash and 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company will pay a 3% net smelter returns royalty on all uranium sales. The Company shall have the right to reduce the royalty from 3% to 0% by paying the aggregate sum of $1,500,000 ($500,000 for each 1%).
  34
 Table of Contents
  On May 27, 2011, the Company entered into purchase and sale agreement (the “Agreement”) with Absaroka Stone LLC (“Absaroka”) pursuant to which the Company has agreed to purchase certain unpatented mining claims commonly known as the “Uinta County (Carnotite) Uranium Prospect” located in the Uinta County of Wyoming (the “Property” and the transaction, the “Mining Purchase”).  Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Absaroka agreed not to stake for its own account any additional mining claims within a fifteen mile radius of the Property.  Any additional mining claims to be located within the fifteen (15) mile radius of the Property (the “Claim Body”) shall be located, staked and filed by the Company, at the Company’s expense and held in the Company’s name.  In consideration for the purchase of the Property, the Company paid Absaroka $15,000 upon execution of the Agreement.  Additionally, the Company agreed to spend a minimum of $200,000 relating to location, maintenance, exploration, development or equipping any one or more of the mining claims that comprise the Claim Body for commercial production within 24 months from the date of the Agreement.  If the Company fails to incur a minimum of $200,000 in expenses related to the foregoing within 24 months, the Company shall pay an aggregate sum of $50,000 to Absaroka. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company agrees to pay a 1% gross royalty (the “Royalty Payment”) to Absaroka on any revenues derived from the sale of all uranium-vanadium, gold, silver, copper and rare earth ores or concentrates produced from the Claim Body, up to an aggregate of $1,000,000.  The Company has the option to eliminate the obligation of the Royalty Payment by paying Absaroka an aggregate payment of $1,000,000.
 
 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
 Since our inception, we have not engaged in any off-balance sheet arrangements, including the use of structured finance, special purpose entities or variable interest entities.
 
 ITEM3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
 Not Applicable
 
 ITEM4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
 
 EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
 We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.
 
 With respect to the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon this evaluation, the Company’s management has concluded that certain disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2011 due to the Company’s limited internal resources and lack of ability to have multiple levels of transaction review.
 
 Management is in the process of determining how best to change our current system and implement a more effective system to insure that information required to be disclosed in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported accurately. Our management acknowledges the existence of this problem, and intends to developed procedures to address them to the extent possible given limitations in financial and manpower resources. While management is working on a plan, no assurance can be made at this point that the implementation of such controls and procedures will be completed in a timely manner or that they will be adequate once implemented.
  35
 Table of Contents
  CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS
 
 Our management, with the participation our CEO and CFO, performed an evaluation to determine whether any change in our internal controls over financial reporting occurred during the three month period ended June 30, 2011. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and our CFO concluded that no change occurred in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2011, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 PARTII--OTHER INFORMATION
 
 ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
 None
 
 ITEM1A. RISK FACTORS
 
 Not Applicable
 
 ITEM2 - UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
 On April 8, 2011, we issued an aggregate of 750,000 shares of our common stock to a consultant in consideration for services pursuant to a consulting agreement.  The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
 
 On December 28, 2010, we issued 600,000 shares of our common stock in consideration for consulting services pursuant to an amended consulting agreement between the Company and Marinex Media, Inc.  On June 14, 2011, we appointed to the board of directors  Jonathan Braun, who is the President of Marinex Media, Inc.  The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
 
 The above transactions did not involve any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering. The issuance of these securities was deemed to be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering.
 
 ITEM3 - DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
 
 NONE
 
 ITEM4 - [REMOVED AND RESERVED.]
 
 ITEM5 - OTHER INFORMATION
 
 None.
 
 ITEM6 - EXHIBITS.
 
 31.1
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
  36
 Table of Contents
  SIGNATURES
 
 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
   Dated: August 22, 2011
Continental Resources Group, Inc.

By: /s/ Joshua BleakJoshua Bleak, President andChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)By: /s/ David P. LiebermanActing Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
  37
 Table of Contents
  EXHIBIT INDEX
 
 Exhibit No.                                Description
 
 31.1
Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.31.2
Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002.32.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.32.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
 
 38