alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 of the SABANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



I, James D. Constantine, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial and Administrative Officer of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | the quarterly Report, as amended, on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period ended May 4, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report, as amended, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: May 2, 2003



/s/ James D. Constantine

James D. Constantine

Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families 

Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Director of the Anti-Trafficking in Persons Division, the following authority vested in the Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, Public Law No. 106-386, 114 Stat. 1464 (2000). 

                    (a)                     *Authority Delegated.*

Authority to conduct certification activities under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000, Public Law No. 106-386, 107(b)(1), 114 Stat. 1464, 1475 (2000). In exercising this authority, personnel in the Office of Refugee Resettlement will consult with the Attorney General. 

                    (b)                     *Limitations and Conditions.*

1. This delegation shall be exercised under the Department's existing delegation of authority and policy on regulations. 

2. This delegation shall be exercised under financial and administrative requirements applicable to all Administration for Children and Families' authorities. 

3. This authority may not be re-delegated. 

(c) Effective Date. 

This delegation of authority is effective upon the date of signature. 

                    (d)                     *Effect on Existing Delegations.*

None. 

In addition, I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the Director, Anti-Trafficking in Persons Division, which, in effect, involved the exercise of these authorities prior to the effective date of this delegation. 

Dated: January 23, 2008. 

Brent Orrell, 

Acting Director, Office of Refugee Resettlement. 

[FR Doc. 08-355 Filed 1-28-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 23-12157

____________________

WILLIAM HAROLD WRIGHT, JR., 

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Respondent-Appellee.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:21-cv-02691-KKM-SPF

____________________

Before BRASHER and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.

USCA11 Case: 23-12157 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 04/12/2024 Page: 1 of 3
2 Order of the Court 23-12157

BY THE COURT:

Upon review of the record and the responses to the jurisdictional question, this appeal is DISMISSED IN PART for lack of jurisdiction as untimely. William Wright filed a notice of appeal, 

deemed filed on June 15, 2023, challenging the final order denying 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, interlocutory orders that merged into 

that final judgment, and multiple post-judgment orders.

Wright’s June 15, 2023 notice of appeal is not timely to appeal from the February 15, 2023 final order and judgment or the 

interlocutory orders that merged into that judgment because it was 

not filed within 60 days of entry of that judgment. See Fed. R. App. 

P. 4(a)(1)(B); 28 U.S.C. § 2107(b). Only one of Wright’s post-judgment filings could serve as a timely tolling motion filed within 28 

days of the entry of judgment, but that March 14, 2023 filing was 

denied on March 22, 2023, more than 60 days before Wright filed 

his June 15 notice of appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), 4(A); 

28 U.S.C. § 2107(b). Wright’s subsequent filings could not toll the 

time to appeal from the final order and judgment for a second time. 

See Wansor v. George Hantscho Co., 570 F.2d 1202, 1206 & n.5 (5th 

Cir. 1978); Wright v. Preferred Research, Inc., 891 F.2d 886, 889 (11th 

Cir. 1990). 

Furthermore, the notice of appeal was not filed within 60 

days of the entry of the April 10 and 15, 2023 post-judgment orders 

Wright challenges, and he did not file any timely tolling motions as 

to those orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), (4)(A); 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2107(b); Williams v. Bolger, 633 F.2d 410, 413 (5th Cir. 1980). We 

USCA11 Case: 23-12157 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 04/12/2024 Page: 2 of 3
23-12157 Order of the Court 3

conclude that the district court was not required to enter judgment 

as to the April 10 and 15, 2023 orders in a separate document because the April 10 and 15 orders fall within Rule 58(a)’s exception 

to the separate document requirement for orders denying Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 52(b), 59, and 60 motions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a). 

Finally, Wright’s June 15, 2023 notice of appeal is timely to 

appeal from the May 11, 16, and 25, and June 3, 2023 post judgment 

orders he challenges because his notice was filed within 60 days of 

the entry of those orders. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2107(b). Thus, this appeal may proceed as to only those postjudgment orders. 

USCA11 Case: 23-12157 Document: 36-1 Date Filed: 04/12/2024 Page: 3 of 3
Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) 

Updates

LaVon B. Rutherford, CHP

SEC Health Physics Team Leader

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Purpose

 Update the Advisory Board

• SEC Summary

• Petitions in qualification

• Petitions under evaluation

• Petitions currently under Board review

• Potential SEC petitions (83.14)

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
SEC Summary Table

 Petitions received 229

 Petitions in qualification process 2

 Petitions qualified for evaluation 140 

• NIOSH evaluation in progress 2

• NIOSH evaluation completed 138

• Reports with the Advisory Board 11

• Petitions not qualifying for evaluation 87

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Petitions in Qualification

 SEC 0227 Rocky Flats Plant

• All employees

• Time period 1/01/1984 through 10/13/2005

 SEC 0228 Y-12 Plant

• All machinist in a number of bldgs

• Time period 1/01/1962 through 12/31/1991

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Petitions under Evaluation

 SEC-0221, Lawrence Livermore National 

Laboratory, Livermore, CA (1974-2014) 

• Expected Completion: Feb. 2016 

 SEC-0224, Argonne National Lab (West), 

Scoville, ID (1951-1979)

• Expected Completion: Feb. 2016

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Currently under Board Review

 Awaiting initial Board action:

• SEC-210, Kansas City Plant

• SEC-219, Idaho National Lab.

• SEC-223, Carborundum

• SEC-225, Blockson Chemical residual period 

(Presented to Advisory Board this meeting)

• SEC-229, Battelle King Ave (83.14, Presented to 

Advisory Board this meeting) 

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Sites with remaining evaluation periods awaiting action

Fernald 

(SEC-0046)

1984-1989 Sandia National

Laboratories -

Albuquerque 

(SEC-0188)

1995-2011

Los Alamos 

National 

Laboratory 

(SEC-0109)

1996-2005 Santa Susana Field

Laboratory 

(SEC-0093)

1965

Rocky Flats Plant

(SEC-0192)

1984-1989 Savannah River 

Site

(SEC-0103)

1973-2007

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

Currently under Board Review cont.
Potential SEC Petitions (83.14)

 Sandia National Laboratories – Albuquerque (1945-48)

 Dayton Project Monsanto (modify based on 

change in facility designation)

 Changed to a Department of Energy facility

 Add the 9-month period when operations 

were being shifted from “The Dayton Project” 

to Mound

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
Questions?

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Mayquest Ventures, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010
of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                 /s/ Roman Zherdytskyi
                                 ----------------------------
                                 Roman Zherdytskyi
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer

Date: July 26, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5585 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5585

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2018

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To extend the authorization for the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
                              Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE ADVISORY COMMISSION.

    Effective September 26, 2018, section 8(a) of Public Law 87-126 (16 
U.S.C. 459b-7(a)) is amended in the second sentence by striking 
``2018'' and inserting ``2028''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 25, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11


                              AMSCAN HOLDINGS, INC.
                       RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIO DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                           FOUR MONTHS  EIGHT MONTHS
                                                            YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,           ENDED        ENDED        YEAR ENDED
                                                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                            APRIL 30,   DECEMBER 31,    DECEMBER 31,
                                                     2000      2001      2002      2003       2004          2004            2005
                                                   --------  --------  --------  --------   --------    ------------    ------------
<S>                                                <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>        <C>         <C>             <C>
Earnings:
Income (loss) before taxes and minority interests  $ 13,539  $ 18,793  $ 27,234  $ 27,327   $ (1,395)     $ 14,380       $ 17,221
Add:  fixed charges                                  29,847    28,355    26,205    31,031      9,800        21,674         36,230
Deduct: interest capitalized                           (223)     (981)
                                                   --------  --------  --------  --------   --------      --------       --------

Earnings, as adjusted                              $ 43,163  $ 46,167  $ 53,439  $ 58,358   $  8,405      $ 36,054       $ 53,541
                                                   ========  ========  ========  ========   ========      ========       ========

Computation of fixed charges:
   Interest, expensed and capitalized              $ 26,834  $ 25,205  $ 21,970  $ 26,609   $  8,494      $ 19,137       $ 31,989
   Interest portion of rent expense                   3,013     3,150     4,235     4,422      1,306         2,537          4,241
                                                   --------  --------  --------  --------   --------      --------       --------
    Total fixed charges                            $ 29,847  $ 28,355  $ 26,205  $ 31,031   $  9,800      $ 21,674       $ 36,230
                                                   ========  ========  ========  ========   ========      ========       ========


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                     1.4x      1.6x      2.0x      1.9x       0.9x          1.7x           1.5x
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of iGate Corporation: 

 

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report dated February 27, 2004, appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of iGate Corporation also included an audit of the financial statement schedules for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this Form 10-K. In our opinion, the financial statement schedules for the yearsended December 31, 2003 and 2002 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. The financial statement schedule of iGate Corporation for theyear ended December 31, 2001 was audited by other independent accountants who have ceased operations. Those independent accountants expressed an unqualified opinion on that financial statement schedule in their report dated February 5, 2002, exceptwith respect to the matters discussed in Notes 6 and 16, as to which the date is March 15, 2002. 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

Pittsburgh, PA 

February 27, 2004
Exhibit
32.02





Section
906, Certification of the CFO





CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ServisFirst Bancshares,
Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





Date:
      October 30, 2009
              By:
      /s/ William M.
      FosheeWilliam
      M. FosheeChief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the registrant and will
be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5817 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric 

project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2018 

Mr. COOK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 13123, the 

8 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the 

9 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with 

10 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requireVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:06 May 31, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5817.IH H5817

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5817 IH

1 ments of that section and the Commission’s procedures 

2 under that section, extend the time period during which 

3 the licensee is required to commence the construction of 

4 the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 

5 the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued 

6 by the Commission. 

7 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

8 period required for commencement of construction of the 

9 project described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission may 

11 reinstate the license for the project effective as of the date 

12 of its expiration and the first extension authorized under 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of such expira14 tion. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 7842** 

TAVO GLENN, a/k/a Tavo T. Glenn, a/k/a Tavo Tarrell Glenn , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN, LIEBER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee , and
J ON OZMINT , Respondent
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson
. Patrick Michael Duffy , Senior District Judge. ( 8:08

- cv - 03078

- PMD )

Submitted : April 15, 2010 Decided: June 8 , 2010

Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tavo Glenn, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tavo Glenn seeks to appeal the district court’s ord er accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006) . A

cer tificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006) . A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683

- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Glenn has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral ar gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of iGATE Corporation:



| | 1. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-20033) pertaining to the Mastech Corporation 1996 Stock Incentive Plan of iGATE Corporation;
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-71057) pertaining to the Mastech Corporation Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan of iGATE Corporation;
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-134689) pertaining to the iGATE Corporation 2006 Stock Incentive Plan of iGATE Corporation; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4. | Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-170042) of iGATE Corporation.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

of our reports dated February 17, 2011, with respect to the 2010 consolidated financial statements of iGATE Corporation and the 2010 effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
iGATE Corporation, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/ Ernst & Young

New Delhi, India

February 17, 2011