alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 5





L3Harris Technologies, Inc.


1025 West NASA Boulevard


Melbourne, Florida 32919





L3Harris Technologies, Inc.


1025 West NASA Boulevard


Melbourne, Florida 32919





RE: L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 2024 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN — REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8


Ladies and Gentlemen:


I am Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of L3Harris Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“L3Harris”), and in such capacity I, together with lawyers over whom I exercise supervision, have acted as counsel for L3Harris in connection with the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (the “Registration Statement”), filed or to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), to register 20,986,458 shares of L3Harris’ common stock, par value $1.00 per share (the “Shares”), which may be offered and sold under the L3Harris Technologies, Inc. 2024 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), as specified in the Registration Statement.


In connection therewith, I have examined such corporate records and other documents and instruments, including the Registration Statement, as I have deemed relevant and necessary to express the opinions contained herein. In the examination of such documents and instruments, I have assumed the genuineness of all signatures, the legal capacity of natural persons, the authenticity of all documents submitted to me as originals and the conformity to those original documents of all documents submitted to me as certified or photostatic copies.


I am admitted to practice only in the States of New York and Florida. The opinions expressed herein are limited in all respects to the Federal laws of the United States of America and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, insofar as such laws apply, and I express no opinion as to conflicts of law rules, or the laws of any states or jurisdictions, including Federal laws regulating securities or the rules or regulations of stock exchanges or any other regulatory body, other than as specified above.


Based upon and subject to the foregoing, I am of the opinion that:


1. L3Harris is a corporation duly incorporated and validly existing under the laws of the State of Delaware.





2. The Shares have been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action on the part of L3Harris and, when issued and sold pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Plan, will be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.





The opinions expressed herein are rendered only to L3Harris in connection with the matters addressed herein and may not be relied upon by any person or entity for any purpose without my prior written consent.


I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion with the Commission as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. In giving this consent, I do not admit that I am in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act or the rules and regulations of the Commission thereunder.





Very truly yours,


/s/ Scott T. Mikuen, Esq.


Scott T. Mikuen, Esq.


Senior Vice President, General Counsel


and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 1615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-61]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 9 a.m. (Eastern Time), January 22, 2008.

Place: 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.

Status: Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the 
public.

Matters to be Considered: 

Parts Open to the Public

1. Approval of the minutes of the December 17, 2007 Board member 
meeting.
2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director.
    a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.
    b. Legislative Report.
3. Quarterly Reports.
    a. Investment Performance and Policy Review.
    b. Vendor Financial Reports.
4. Audit Status Report.
5. Review of 2008 Board Meeting Calendar.

Parts Closed to the Public

6. Personnel.

Contact Person for More Information: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: January 7, 2008.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 08-61 Filed 1-7-08; 12:08 pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



Intraware, Inc.
                   Orinda, Ca

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-109969, 333-107881,
333-90442, 333-89566, 333-65112 and 333-53858) and Form S-8 (No. 333-53902, 333-93823, 333-74209 and 333-138270) of
Intraware, Inc. of our report dated April 24, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule,
which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                   San Francisco, Ca

April 24, 2008

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF DURWOOD, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,250
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,250
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,250
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              251
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,999
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,250
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,001
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,001
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,001)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,001)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Richard E. Gathright                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| Richard E. Gathright                                         |
| Chief Executive Officer and President                        |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                                |
| October 28, 2011                                             |
|                                                         |
| /s/ Michael S. Shore                                         |
| Michael S. Shore                                             |
| Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior Vice President |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                                |
| October 28, 2011                                             |

----
Superior Court

of the

State of Delaware

Jan R. Jurden Leonard L. Williams Justice Center

President Judge 500 North King Street, Suite 10400

Wilmington, Delaware 19801

- 3733

Telephone (302) 255

- 0665

March 9 , 202 1

Adria B. Martinelli , Esquire Frank Minor

Lauren E.M. Russell , Esquire 210 Abbey Lane

Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP Logan Township, NJ 08085

Rodney Square

1000 N. King St. Daniel C. Mulveny , Esquire

Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Department of Justice

820 North French Street, 6th Fl.

Wilmington, Delaware 19801

RE: Delaware River & Bay Authority

v.

Frank Minor and Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board

C.A. No. N19A

- 10

- 004 JRJ

Dear Counsel and Mr. Minor :

The Court has received t wo letters filed on March 3, 202 1

— one filed

by Appellee Frank Minor and the other filed by counsel for Appellant

Delaware River & Bay Authority

. 1

In his letter, Mr. Minor asks the Court to strike Appellant’s Reply Brief

because it was filed later than 10 days after Appellant’s counsel received his

Responding Brief

. 2 Mr. Minor notes that this deadline was established in the

briefing schedule that the Court issued on November 19, 2020. 3

1 Trans. ID. 66388073 ; Trans. ID. 66388192

. 2 Trans. ID. 66388073

. 3 Trans. ID. 66388192; Trans. ID. 66126992.2

Appellant ’s counsel respond that , due to COVID

- 19, they had been

working remotely when the Responding Brief was delivered

. 4 They also

explain that their law firm’s “ normal protocols for logging and emailing mail

to the recipient were for some reason not followed in this instance ,” so they

did not receive notice of the Responding Brief until it was filed electronically. 5

After they received notice

, Appellant’s counsel filed the Reply Brief within

10 days pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 6(a). 6

Recognizing that we are in the midst of a global pandemic , which has

sown much logistical confusion, t he Court declines to strike Appellant’s

Reply Brief for untimeliness

.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Jan R. Jurden

Jan R. Jurden

P resident Judge

JRJ:mls

cc: Prothonotary

4 Trans. ID. 66388192

. 5 Id.

6 Id.
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.4


December 3, 2015


Pam Ahrens
East Greenville, PA


Dear Pam:
It is my pleasure to inform you that you will be a participant in the 2016 Knoll, Inc. Incentive Compensation Program.
We are counting on you to help us build on the positive momentum we created in 2015 across each of our business segments.  We must strive to continue to gain share, improve our profitability, target under-penetrated markets, expand our reach into consumer and decorator channels and build a responsible and technologically efficient infrastructure across all our businesses to position Knoll for success in 2016 and beyond.
If Knoll makes its 2016 operating profit target, Knoll’s Office segment exceeds its segment operating profit plan, and meets the NAO orders and price plan and you achieve your individual objectives you can qualify for a total target incentive payout of one hundred percent (100%) of your base salary.
This award is subject to my approval and that of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors), which may exercise discretion in adjusting your award up or down based on factors the Board of Directors (or appropriate committee of the Knoll, Inc. Board of Directors) deems appropriate, including Knoll’s performance relative to the industry, other macroeconomic factors and your individual performance.  You must be employed by Knoll on the date this award is distributed in order to receive this incentive.
I have great confidence in your ability to contribute to our success in 2016 and look forward to being able to present you with your award in early 2017.
Thank you for all that you do for Knoll.
Sincerely,
/s/ Andrew Cogan                    
Andrew Cogan                        
CEO
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form
10-QSB of Resource Group Inc. for the Quarter Ended August 31, 2008, I, James P.
Geiskopf, President and Chief Executive Officer of Resource Group, Inc.hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the Period Ended
      August 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-QSB for the Period Ended August 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Resource Group, Inc.



|By: | /s/ James P.
      Geiskopf                
|--- | -------------------------------------------
|    | James Geiskopf                             
|    | President and Chief Executive
      Officer



Dated: September 30, 2008

---
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned,Roland C.
Redd, the ChiefFinancialOfficerofREMUDA INVESTMENT
CORPORATION(the “Company”), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned
has executed this statement this12thday of May, 2010.





/s/ Roland C. ReddRoland C. ReddChief Financial
  Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided toREMUDA
INVESTMENT CORPORATIONand will be retained byREMUDA INVESTMENT CORPORATIONand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.4

Asteriko Corp.

616 Corporate Way, Suite 2-6834
Valley Cottage, NY 10989
Phone: (845) 512-5020


This  letter  is to  confirm  the terms of an  agreement  made on August 5, 2014
between Asteriko Corp. and Ilia Tomski.

Mr. Tomski has verbally agreed to loan Asteriko Corp. funds at his discretion to
complete the registration process in the event that the company does not raise
sufficient funds.


September 2nd, 2014                      Treasurer /s/ KSENIA TOMSKI
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Ksenia Tomskaia
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1897** 

LOLITO DELA CRUZ BANANO, a/k/a Lolito De La Cruz Banano , Petitioner ,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of a n Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : March 16, 2016 Decided: March 18, 2016

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Lourdes Santos Tancinco, TANCINCO LAW OFFICES, San Francisco, California, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Stephen J. Flynn, Assistant Director, James A. Hurley, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lolito Dela Cruz Banano, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of an order of the Board of

Imm igration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his motion for a continuance. An Immigration Judge “may grant a continuance for good cause shown.” 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (2015). We review the denial of a motion for a con tinuance for abuse of discretion. Lendo v. Gonzales , 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir. 2007); Onyeme v. INS , 146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir. 1998). We will uphold the denial of a continuance “unless it was made without a rational explanation, it inexplicably depar ted from established policies, or it rested on an impermissible basis, e.g., invidious discrimination against a particular race or group.” Lendo , 493 F.3d at 441 (internal quotation marks omitted). Upon review of the record and Banano’s claims , we find n o abuse of discretion in the denial of his motion for a continuance. See In re Hashmi , 24 I. & N. Dec. 785, 79 0

- 9 2 (B.I.A. 2009). Banano also contends that his due process rights were violated during the proceeding s because the agency disregarded his e vidence and would not allow him to adequately develop the record with respect to the bona fides of his marriage. We review due process claims de novo. See Lin v. Mukasey , 517 F.3d 685, 691

- 92 (4th Cir. 2008). We have review ed the record in3 light of Bana no’s specific contentions and conclude that Banano cannot succeed on his due process claim because he fails to demonstrate that any alleged defects prejudiced the outcome of his case

. See Anim v. Mukasey , 535 F.3d 243, 256 (4th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, w e deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 1, 2019

No. 04-18-00822-CR

Jake Eric ALVARADO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-05-11980-CR

Honorable Camile Glasscock Dubose, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The State’s brief was originally due to be filed on March 28, 2019. On April 1, 2019, the 

State filed a motion for extension of time to file its brief requesting a 90-day extension of the 

deadline. By order dated April 3, 2019, this court granted the motion; however, our order stated, 

“Given the length of the extension, THIS IS THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT 

THE STATE WILL BE GRANTED.”

On June 26, 2019, the State filed a second motion for extension of time to file its brief

based on two recent deaths in the immediate family of the attorney representing the State. The 

motion is GRANTED; however, given the length of the extensions granted to date, THIS IS 

THE FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME THAT THE STATE WILL BE GRANTED. The 

State’s brief must be filed no later than July 26, 2019.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of July, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 6341** 

IVEY WALKER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

– Appellee, and N. L. CONNOR, Warden, Respondent

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Max O. Cogburn, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:02

- cv - 00066

- MOC )

Submitted : July 17, 2012 Decided: August 1, 2012

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Ivey Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bin ding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ivey Walker seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to amend his previously d eni ed 28
U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the dist rict court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2 000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Walker has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.01

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of iGATE Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Sunil Wadhwani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 17, 2008

/s/     SUNIL
WADHWANISunil WadhwaniCo-Chairman of the Board of Directors,Chief Executive Officer, and Director