alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with Quarterly Report of Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,  Owen Gibson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented.





By:
            /s/Owen GibsonName:
            Owen
      GibsonTitle:
            Principal
      Executive Officer,Principal
      Financial Officer and DirectorDate:
            May
      15, 2009





This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Alba Mineral Exploration,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Merchants Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul W.
Pence, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 30, 2004

                             /s/ Paul W. Pence, Jr.

                             Paul W. Pence, Jr.
                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

                                       43
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit

No. 01-2443 JOHN GARRETT, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. TANDY CORPORATION D/B/A RADIO SHACK,

Defendant, Appellee.

_____________________ ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court, issued on July 9, 2002, should be amended as follows: On page 28, line 3 of 2nd paragraph, replace "then" with "than".
Exhibit32

 

 

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Sino-American Investment Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the periodended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

 

1.The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

 

                           Date:November 26,  2016                                           /s/ Zhong Fang

                                                                                     -------------------------------

                                                                                         ZhongFang, CEO & CFO
A96A0868.

#### NORTH FULTON FEED, INC. v. PURINA MILLS, INC.

(472 SE2d 122)

McMURRAY, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff North Fulton Feed, Inc. (“North Fulton”) brought this contract action against defendant Purina Mills, Inc. (“Purina Mills”), alleging breach of an oral promise to deliver feed (Count 1), promissory estoppel (Count 2), and deceptive and unfair trade practices (Count 3). Defendant denied the material allegations and defended in part on the ground that North Fulton’s claims are “barred by the Statute of Frauds. . . .” The trial court, “having carefully considered all matters of record in the case including all depositions and affidavits on file as well as the briefs and arguments of counsel,” granted summary judgment in favor of defendant, and this appeal followed. *Held:*

*577Decided May 29, 1996.

*Mark P. Ellis, Guy J. Camuso, Jr.,*for appellant.

*Sell & Melton, Joseph W. Popper, Jr., Robert D. McCullers,*for appellee.

In three related enumerations of error, plaintiff maintains that he has presented “evidence creating questions of fact to be determined by a jury regarding the damages suffered as a result of [defendant’s alleged] breach of contract [and plaintiff’s detrimental reliance].”

Plaintiff’s notice of appeal directed the Clerk of the Superior Court of Fulton County only to “prepare the record for appeal to the Court of Appeals,” and fails to specify whether the evidence adduced in support of and in opposition to summary judgment will be included with the record. See OCGA § 5-6-51. As transmitted to the Court of Appeals of Georgia from the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia, the record does not contain any of the depositions or affidavits referred to by the superior court in its order granting summary judgment to defendant. “In order for the appellate court to determine whether the judgment appealed from was erroneous, it is the duty of the appellant to include in the record those items which will enable the appellate court to perform an objective review of the evidence and proceedings.” *Deen v. United Dominion Realty Trust,*218 Ga. App. 443 (1), 444 (462 SE2d 384). “ ‘Where the appellant fails to bring up a transcript or otherwise meet his burden of affirmatively showing error by the record, the judgment will not be disturbed. (I)t is well established that (a) brief cannot be used in lieu of the record or transcript for adding evidence to the record.’ . . . *Brown v. Thomas,*191 Ga. App. 679, 680 (1) (382 SE2d 656) (1989). Accordingly, as [plaintiff in the case sub judice] presented no evidence in support of these enumerations other than [undocumented] arguments in its briefs and references to [matters not supported by the record as transmitted to this Court], we must assume that the trial court’s ruling [granting summary judgment] was correct. Id.; see *Akridge v. Patillo,*44 Ga. 585 (1872).” *Trend-Pak of Atlanta v. Arbor Commercial Div.,*197 Ga. App. 137, 138 (1) (397 SE2d 592).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Johnson and Ruffin, JJ., concur.*
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5737 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 108 West D Street in Alpha, Illinois, as the 

‘‘Captain Joshua E. Steele Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5737 EH

1 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN JOSHUA E. STEELE POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 108 West D Street in Alpha, Illi4 nois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Captain Josh5 ua E. Steele Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Joshua E. 

10 Steele Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5737 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Alpha, Illinois, as the ‘‘Captain Joshua E. Steele al Service located at 108 West D Street in
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 129281 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129281 

 COA: 259494 

Muskegon CC: 99-044125-FC

MELVIN WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1121 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2005 

Clerk
TKP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0326

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LAWRENCE MATTHEW BRASDA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for an extension of time, and 

good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time

to and including January 25, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file the 

State’s response.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 5 2021

01/05/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0326
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 19, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9127-9132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-685]



[[Page 9127]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[FDA No. 225-07-3002]


Memorandum of Understanding Between the Walter Reed Army 
Institute for Research, the Food and Drug Administration, and the F. 
Edward Herbert School of Medicine of the Uniformed Services University 
of the Health Sciences

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of 
a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Walter Reed Army 
Institute of Research, FDA, and the F. Edward Herbert School of 
Medicine of the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. 
This MOU identifies the terms of collaboration between the three 
Federal entities in the coordination of the established Clinical 
Pharmacology Fellowship Training Program. Specifically, this 
collaboration provides for active duty Army, Air Force, Navy, and 
Public Health Service Medical Corps officers in the fellowship program 
to arrange a 2 to 4 month internship within FDA's Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research (CDER) through CDER's Office of Clinical 
Pharmacology.

DATES: The agreement became effective January 8, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shiew Mei Huang, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 21, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-1541.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which 
states that all written agreements and MOUs between FDA and others 
shall be published in the Federal Register, the agency is publishing 
notice of this MOU.

    Dated: February 8, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S

[[Page 9128]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19FE08.004


[[Page 9129]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19FE08.005


[[Page 9130]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19FE08.006


[[Page 9131]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19FE08.007


[[Page 9132]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN19FE08.008

[FR Doc. 08-685 Filed 2-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-C?>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00310-CV

Gray, Ritter & Graham, PC; Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLC; Neblett 

Beard & Arsenault, LLP; Don M. Downing; and Adam J. Levitt

v.

Goldman Phipps PLLC f/k/a Goldman Pennebaker & Phipps, PC; Mikal C. Watts, PC; 

and Murray Law Firm

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No 3 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2012-CCV-62122-3

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 8, 2015
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 568 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require certain Federal 

officials to make requisite financial disclosures within 30 days of assuming office, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2017 

Ms. SA ́NCHEZ (for herself, Ms. JAYAPAL, and Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require 

certain Federal officials to make requisite financial disclosures within 30 days of assuming office, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Account5 ability in Reporting Act’’ or the ‘‘FAIR Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 568 IH

1 SEC. 2. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES WITHIN 30 DAYS OF AS2 SUMING OFFICE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 101(a) of the Ethics in 

4 Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. 101) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘or as a candidate for the posi7 tion’’; and 

8 (2) by adding after the period at the end the 

9 following: ‘‘An individual who assumes any such po10 sition and who filed a report as a candidate for such 

11 position under subsection (c) shall file a report con12 taining the information described in section 102(b) 

13 by May 15 of the year in which the individual as14 sumed the position or within 30 days of assuming 

15 the position, whichever is later.’’. 

16 (b) APPLICATION.—The amendments made by sub17 section (a) shall apply to any individual assuming the posi18 tion of an officer or employee described in subsection (f) 

19 of section 101 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 

20 (5 U.S.C. App. 101(f)) on or after the date of enactment 

21 of this section. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
The HONORABLE HOWARD F. SACHS, United States Distri ct Judge for the 1 Western District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1438

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Eric Lashon Jiles, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 6, 1997 Filed: September 2, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. While serving a t

en-year term in the Missouri correctional system, Eric Lashon Jiles appeared in federal court under a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum an d pleaded gu ilty to aiding and abetting the attempted possession of cocaine base with intentto dis tribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The distric t court se ntenced Jiles to 188 months in prison and five years supervised release , 1 recommending to the United States Bureau of Prisons that his federal sentence run-2-

co ncurrently with his state sentence. Jiles returned to state custody, where he wa s reclassified as a more serious offender due to the federal conviction. Jiles appeals his sentence, arguing that he has lost rights and privi leges in state prison in violation of the Double Jeopardy Cl ause, and asking us to direct the district court to order the Bureau of Prisons to take him into custody so he may serve his concurrent sentences at a federal prison. We affirm.

“As a gene ral rule, the first sovereign to arrest a defendant has priority o f jur isdictionfor trial, sentencing, and incarceration.” Thomas v. Brewer , 923 F.2 d 1361, 1365 (9th Cir. 1991). A writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum affords only tempor ary custody of a prisoner confined within another jurisdiction for purposes o f indicting, prosecuting, and sentencing the prisoner. See Flick v. Blevins , 887 F.2d 778, 781 (7th C ir. 1989) (per curiam), cert. denied , 495 U.S. 934 (1990). Jiles has no t shown that the State of Missouri waived its prior right of custody or agreed that he may
ser ve his concurrent sentences within the federal correctional system. Therefore, h e gives us no basis to order the Bureau of Prisons or the St ate of Missouri to transfer him to federal custody.

Jiles concedes that his federal conviction and senten ce do not violate the Double Jeopard y Clause. Whether his loss of privileges in state prison raises a legitimat e double jeopardy concern is not within our jurisdi ction on this appeal. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

1150 Tusculum Ave 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

January 15, 2016

The Honorable Sylvia M. Burwell

Secretary 

Department of Health and Human Services

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Madam Secretary:

 

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has 

completed its evaluation of Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 

00210 concerning workers at the Kansas City Plant Site in Kansas City, 

Missouri, under the statutory requirements established by the Energy 

Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 and 

incorporated into 42 C.F.R. § 83.13.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has 

recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for:

“All employees who worked in any area of the Kansas City Plant 

site in Kansas City, Missouri, from January 1, 1949, through 

December 31, 1993.” 

NIOSH found that it has access to adequate exposure monitoring and 

other information necessary to do individual dose reconstructions with 

sufficient accuracy for members of this group, and therefore a class 

covering this group should not be added to the SEC. The Board concurs 

with this determination.

Based on these considerations and the discussion at the November 18 

and 19, 2015, Board meeting held in Oakland, California, the Board 

recommends that this class not be added to the SEC. 

Enclosed is the documentation from the Board meeting(s) where this SEC 

class was discussed. The documentation includes copies of the petition, 

the NIOSH review thereof, and related materials. If any of these items are

unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly.

Sincerely,

 

[Signature on File]

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

Chairman, ABRWH

Enclosure

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D.

 Madison, WiE

scnons c. in

Josie Beach

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson

 Rexburg, Idaho

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa

David Kotelchuck, Ph.D.

 New York, New York

Richard Lemen, Ph.D.

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D.

 Cincinnati, Ohio

Wanda I. Munn

 Richland, Washington

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D.

 College Station, Texas

David B. Richardson, Ph.D.

Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D.

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico

Loretta R. Valerio

 Santa Fe, New Mexico

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia
EXHIBIT 21.1



                         Mobius Management Systems, Inc.
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant



                                                   State or Other Jurisdiction
Registrant                                         of Incorporation
----------                                         ----------------
Mobius Management Systems, Inc.                    Delaware


Subsidiaries of the Registrant
------------------------------
MMS Acquisition I LLC                              Delaware
Mobius Management Systems (Canada) LLC             Delaware
Mobius Management Systems (UK) Ltd.                United Kingdom
Mobius Management Systems (Canada), Inc.           Canada
Mobius Management Systems (France) S.a.r.l.        France
Mobius Management Systems (Deutschland) GmbH       Germany
Mobius Management Systems (Italy) S.r.l.           Italy
Mobi Management Systems Sweden AB                  Sweden
Mobius Management Systems (Australia) PTY LTD      Australia
Mobius Management Systems (Switzerland) GmbH       Switzerland
Mobius Management Systems (Japan) K.K.             Japan
Mobius Management Systems (Benelux) B.V.           Netherlands