alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the accompanying Form 10-KSB of ZAP for the year ended
December 31, 2004, Steven M. Schneider, Director and Chief Executive Officer of
ZAP, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)  such Form Type of ZAP for the year ended December 31, 2004,fully complies
     with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities
     Exchange of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in such Form 10-QSB of ZAP for the year ended
     December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
     condition and results of operations of ZAP.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to ZAP and will be retained by ZAP
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


/s/  Steven M. Schneider
------------------------
Steven M. Schneider
Director and Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2005
Exhibit 31.2

I, Sujit Sircar, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of IGATE Corporation; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
by this report.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                     |  |  |  | IGATE CORPORATION      
|                     |  | 
|Date: April 29, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/    SUJIT
SIRCAR    
|                     |  |  |  | Sujit Sircar           
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health Teleconference of the

Santa Susanna Field Laboratory Work Group & DeSoto Working Group

October 15, 2020

Video Conference Call Information: 

Join ZoomGov Meeting 

https://cdc.zoomgov.com/j/16067633819?pwd=RUdiYXlZZHFKanpJOHZrcGJIbTlaZz09

Meeting ID: 160 6763 3819

Passcode: ABRWH#01

Dial by your location 

 +1 669 254 5252 US (West Coast)

 +1 646 828 7666 US (East Coast) 

Meeting ID: 160 6763 3819

Participants ID: #

Passcode: 98685439 

10:30 a.m. (Eastern Time) Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

Area IV SEC Petition #235 

Update 

• NIOSH/DCAS Presentation: Summary of Discussion Points and Document Review in 

Support of SEC-00235 for Area IV of the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (White paper dated 

February 6, 2020). 

• SC&A response 

• Workgroup discussion 

EPA and TRUMP-S documents

• SC&A document review (SC&A Memorandum: Evaluation of Petitioner Specific Concerns 

Regarding SEC-00235 Dated July 25, 2019) 

• NIOSH response

• Workgroup discussion

Desoto Avenue SEC Petition #246 

NIOSH/DCAS responses to SC&A December 7 Review of DCAS SEC Evaluation Report 

Site workers interviews (SC&A Memorandum: Summary of Worker Interviews Conducted in 2018 

and 2019 in Support of the SEC-00246 Evaluation. Dated: July 14, 2020) 

Discussion of Petitioner Submissions

Petitioner Presentation (optional)

SC&A White paper: Review of Documentation Provided by CORE Advocacy Related to the 

Evaluation of SEC-00235 at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory (Report dated November 25, 2019) 

Review of records from Boeing incident database (SC&A Memorandum: Review and

Characterization of Boeing Incident Database for SEC-00246 Dated: June 10, 2019) 

SC&A 2020 White Paper (tentative) 
Work Group discussion and recommendation for follow-up 

December Board Meeting session plans

Petitioner Comments (optional) 

Adjourn
EX-10.13


 Exhibit 10.13 

AMENDMENT I TO THE 
 FMSA
HOLDINGS INC. LONG TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
 STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT 

This Amendment to the outstanding and unexercised Stock Option Award Agreement (the “Award Agreements”) used by FMSA
Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) to grant stock option awards under the FMSA Holdings Inc. Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2006 Plan”) is effective as of September 11, 2014.

 WHEREAS, the Company previously made grants of stock option awards under the 2006 Plan to certain individuals; 

WHEREAS, the Company changed its name from FML Holdings, Inc. to FMSA Holdings Inc. and wishes to reflect that name change in the Award
Agreements; 
 WHEREAS, holders of vested stock options of the Company (“Optionees”), including holders of
stock options granted under the 2006 Plan, are allowed to exercise such stock options upon pricing of the initial public offering of the Company (the “Offering”) (the stock options so exercised on pricing, the
“Exercised Options”) in order to sell shares received on such exercise (the “Underlying Shares”) in the Offering; 

WHEREAS, Section 11.1, Section 3.2(b) and Section 3.2(c) of the 2006 Plan, as well as the opening recital of the Award
Agreements, provide the board of directors of the Company (the “Board”) with the power to amend the 2006 Plan and the Award Agreements issued thereunder; and 

WHEREAS, the Board has determined it would be in the best interest of the Company to allow Optionees to pay the exercise price for the
Exercised Options granted under the 2006 Plan out of proceeds from the sale of the Underlying Shares in the Company’s Offering (also referred to as a “cashless exercise”). 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Award Agreement shall be deemed to be amended such that (i) all references to the title of
the 2006 Plan shall be changed from the “FML Holdings, Inc. Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan” to the “FMSA Holdings Inc. Long Term Incentive Compensation Plan” and (ii) all other references within such award agreements
to “FML Holdings, Inc.” shall now be references to “FMSA Holdings Inc.”; and 
 FURTHER RESOLVED, that
Section 5 of all Award Agreements issued under the 2006 Plan be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

5. Exercise of Option. The Option may be exercised by delivering to the Chairman of the Board or the President of the
Company at its principal office, 8834 Mayfield Road Chesterland, Ohio 44026, (1) a completed Notice of Exercise of Option setting forth the number of shares with respect to which the Option is being exercised, (2) an executed Counterpart
Signature Page to Stockholders Agreement and (3) either (a) a cash payment in full for the exercise of the Options, or (b) in the Committee’s discretion, payment pursuant to a “cashless exercise” procedure. Such payment
in 3(a) shall be made by certified or cashier’s check payable to the Company in the amount of the aggregate purchase price for such shares. 

  
 1 








			
	FMSA HOLDINGS INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David J. Crandall

		
	Name:	 	 David J. Crandall

		
	Title:	 	 VP, General Counsel, Secretary




  
 2
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant
to
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as
Adopted Pursuant to
 Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Liberty Lane Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), Paul M. Meister, as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Kevin P. Clark, as Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Paul M.
Meister
 Name:
Paul M. Meister
 Title:   Chief
Executive Officer and President
 Date:   July 3,
2008
 
 /s/ Kevin P.
Clark
 Name:
Kevin P. Clark
 Title:   Vice
President, Secretary and Treasurer
 Date:   July 3,
2008
 
 This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-4246EM

_____________ Tommie Powell; Dorothy Powell, * * Appellees, *

* v. * * State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, * * Appellant. *

_____________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern No. 97-4247EM District of Missouri.

_____________ [UNPUBLISHED] Tommie Powell; Dorothy Powell, * * Appellants, *

* v. * * State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, * * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: September 22, 1998

Filed: September 30, 1998

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, HEANEY, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.-2- _____________ PER CURIAM.
After a fire destroyed the home of Tommie and Dorothy Powell, the Powell s brought this diversity action in Missouri torecover under their homeowner’s insurance policy issued by State Farm Fire & Casualty Company. During the trial, State Farm asserted the policy did not cover the loss because the Powells intentionally caused the fire. Alth ough State Farm did not stipulate to the amount of the Powells’ damages , State Farm never contested the Powells’ evidence that their da mages recoverable under the policy equaled $124,364.91. The undisputed testimony showed the Powells ’ property los s far exceeded the policy limits of $121,364.91, and the Powells also had to pay $3000 for temporary housing expenses. Instead of questioning the Powells ’ damages, State Farm sought a set-off of $40,615.38, the amount State Farm had paid on the Pow ells’ mortgages. Rejecting State Farm’s arson defense, the jury found i n favor of the Powells’ claim for policy coverage and awarded damages in the amount of $83,614 . Although the jury denied State Farm’s separate counterclaim fo r reimbursement of the mortgage payments, the amount awarded was almost the precise da mages sustained by the Powells less the amount State Farm paid on the Powells ’ mortgages. Unsatisfied with the result, State Farm filed a motion to amend th e judgm ent asking the district court to subtract the amount of the mortgage payment s from the verdict. In response, the Powells filed a motion to amend the judgment asking for an increase in the verdict to the amount of the uncontested damages. The district court denied both motions to amend. State Farm appeals, and the Powells cross appeal.
We conclude the district court abused its discretion in denying the motions

. Once the jury found State Farm liable for payment under th e policy, the policy required State Farm

to pay $124,364.91, the full amount of the Powells’ uncontested damages up to policy limits, less $40,615.38, the amount of State Farm’s mortgage payments. Thus, the policy requires State Farm to pay the Powells $83,749.53. Missouri law-3-

perm its correction of the verdict in the circumstances of this case. See Bishop v

. Cummine s , 870 S.W.2d 922, 925 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994); Campbell v. Kelley , 71 9 S.W.2d 769, 771-72 (Mo. 1986). We thus reverse and remand for entry of a judgment for the Powells in the amount of $83,749.53. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Miller, Diane M.

From: Francis_M_Roddy@RL.gov

Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 5:39 PM
To: NIOCINDOCKET@CDC.GOV

Subject: Comments on 42CFR83

Attached.

Frank Roddy

8/22/2002

Page 1 of 1


Comments on 42CFR83

This proposed rule would permit the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health
(NIOSH) to establish new special exposure cohorts which would not be subject to the regular
dose reconstruction process in the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation
Program Act (EEOICPA). It would no longer be necessary for DOE to supply the dosimetry
information to NIOSH nor for NIOSH to calculate the workers’ doses and the probability that
these doses had caused their cancer. NIOSH would accept petitions with claims containing a
NIOSH letter stating that the information supplied by DOE was insufficient to permit NIOSH to
perform a dose reconstruction as sufficient proof of the need to establish the special exposure
cohort. NIOSH has already sent out such letters.

The gamma radiation dosimetry used by DOE is energy independent. NIOSH has recently
established special radiation weighting factors, including those for gamma radiation, which are
energy dependent and is requesting that DOE provide energy dependent dosimetry information.
These new weighting factors have not been approved by the various scientific bodies which
normally review and approve such scientific parameters prior to implementation into regulations.
Since DOE cannot supply energy dependent dosimetry, especially for historical dosimetry data,
NIOSH has determined that the dosimetry information supplied by DOE is inadequate to permit
NIOSH to perform dose reconstructions. These letters point to the impending establishment of
additional special exposure cohorts by NIOSH for the EEOICPA, and in the process, avoid the
dose reconstruction process.
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ending March31, 2010 of Secure Window Blinds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Anthony Pizzacalla, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as            adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

 /s/ Anthony Pizzacalla

Anthony Pizzacalla

 

 President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,

 Principal Financial Officer and Director

 

Date: June 14, 2010
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

I, Mark Klok, Principal Executive Officer ofAlto Group Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form10-Q of the Company;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report; and

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annual report.

 

Date: July 20, 2011

 

/s/ Mark Klok	

Mark Klok

Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Ori Goore, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Dynamic
Applications Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:  May
      6 ,2009By:
                /s/ Ori GooreName:
                Ori
      GooreTitle:
                Chief
      Executive Officer andDirector
      (Principal ExecutiveOfficer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7329

TYRONE LAMAR ROBERSON,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ANTHONY J. PADULA, Warden Lee Corrections Institution; 

LIEUTENANT A. DAVIS; MS. FULTON, Medical Health Care 

Provider RN; RN MS. JUDY RABON; RN MS. MCDONALD; J. MCREE, 

MD, KCI Pharmacy; JUANITA MOSS, Food Service Supervisor; 

MS. BELL, Food Service Supervisor; MS. NORMAN, Food Service 

Supervisor; MS. ANDERSON, Food Service Supervisor,

 Defendants – Appellees,

and

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MAJOR JAMES DEAN; 

LIEUTENANT ERNEST MIMS; SERGEANT B. COOK; SERGEANT K. 

ARENS; MS. KELA E. THOMAS, Commission of Probation Parole 

and Pardon Services Director; WILLIAM BYARS, JR., SCDC 

Director, et al; SOUTH CAROLINA STATE BUDGET AND CONTROL 

BOARD COMMITTEE; WILLIAM F. MARSCHER, III, SC Commission on 

Indigent Defense; FREDERICK M. CORLEY, Esquire; RANDOLPH 

MURDAUGH, III, Solicitor Attorney for the State; WILLIAM T. 

HOWELL, Judge of the 14th Judicial Circuit Court of SC,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (2:13-cv-01872-RMG)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016
2

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Lamar Roberson, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Parker McLean, 

CLARKE, JOHNSON, PETERSON & MCLEAN, PA, Florence, South 

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Lamar Roberson appeals the district court’s order 

adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge 

and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Roberson v. Padula, No. 2:13-cv-01872-RMG (D.S.C. 

July 22, 2015). In addition, we decline to address claims 

raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 

1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference of the

Hanford WG

October 26, 2018

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

2:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

Work Group (WG) Discussion

(1) The WG will review the current status of SEC petition and site profile issues (see 

document titled: “Suggested Updates to the Outstanding Dose Reconstruction and Special 

Exposure Cohort Issues for Consideration by the Work Group on Hanford Site Profile 

and SEC”)

(2) Plans for completing SEC petition review

Adjourn
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-760]



[[Page 7900]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, Metabolomics in Drug Abuse Research.
    Date: February 21, 2007.
    Time: 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Eric Zatman, Contract Review Specialist, Office 
of Extramural Affairs, National Institute of Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 
Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-
8401, (301) 435-1438.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 9, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-760 Filed 2-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Locan, Inc., for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, I, Ronald D. Long, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1. Such quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Locan, Inc.  Dated:  October 25, 2010   LOCAN, INC.  By:/s/  Ronald D. Long
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Gulf Onshore, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Cowen, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





By: /s/ Richard
Cowen


Richard
Cowen


Chief
Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer


May 14,
2009