alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Metals and Controls Claims with POC > 50% 

and Employment During the Residual Period

Brant Ulsh, Ph.D., CHP

NIOSH, Research Health Physicist

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Metals and Controls Work Group Meeting

July 13, 2023
Overview

 Introduction

 Case Characteristics

 Conclusion

7/13/2023 2
Introduction 
Introduction (1 of 2)

 At the 2023-05-12 Metals and Controls work group 

meeting, a request was made to provide information 

to the work group concerning residual period claims 

that had received a dose reconstruction that resulted 

in a greater than 50% POC. 

 On 2023-06-07, DCAS provided information in a memo 

dated 2023-05-23.

– Provided in NECP because of PII information

7/13/2023 4
Introduction (2 of 2)

 M&C residual period is 1968-01-01 through 1997-12-

31

 Work Group currently considering SEC Petition 236

7/13/2023 5
Case Characteristics
Overall Characteristics

 There are currently 502 claims with M&C employment

 There are currently 447 claims with M&C employment 

during the residual period.

 There are 308 claims with M&C employment only 

during the residual period.

 Length of employment ranges from 3.5 to 30 years.

7/13/2023 7
Claims with Residual Period Employment Only (1 of 2)

 There were 14 claims with POC>50 and employment 

only during the residual period.

 Cancers included: skin [SCC, BCC, MM] - (10 cases), 

thyroid (3 cases), other (4 cases)

 11 claims with multiple primary cancers

– 7 claims with multiple skin cancers only

– 4 claims with skin + other cancers

7/13/2023 8
Claims with Residual Period Employment Only (2 of 2)

 Reconstructed doses: external only (13 of 14 cases) or 

external + internal (1 of 14 cases)

 Total organ doses ranged from 2.020 to 11.622 rem

7/13/2023 9
Claims with Residual + Operational Period Employment 

(1 of 2)

 There were 10 claims with POC>50 and employment 

during both the operational and residual periods.

 Cancers included: skin [SCC, BCC, MM] - (10 cases), 

thyroid (1 case), other (2 cases)

 10 claims with multiple primary cancers

– 7 claims with multiple skin cancers only

– 3 claims with skin + other cancers

7/13/2023 10
Claims with Residual + Operational Period Employment

(2 of 2)

 Reconstructed doses: external only (10 of 10 cases)

 Total organ doses ranged from 3.377 to 11.792 rem

7/13/2023 11
Conclusion
Conclusions

 For 24 claims with POC>50 and employment during 

the residual period:

– 14 had only non-SEC cancers

– 6 had both non-SEC and SEC cancers

– 4 had only SEC cancers

7/13/2023 13
For more information, contact CDC

1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)

TTY: 1-888-232-6348 www.cdc.gov

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the 

official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Harold Hartley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Arrin Background, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Arrin Background, Inc.


Date: 5/11/09                               By: /s/ Harold Hartley
                                                --------------------------------
                                            Name:  Harold Hartley
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00344-CR

Antonio Leonard Brown

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 89th District Court

of Wichita County (53,525-C)

June 18, 2015

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
EXHIBIT 32.01

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of iGATE Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Sunil Wadhwani, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2006                  
|                                      
|/s/    SUNIL WADHWANI                 
|Sunil Wadhwani                        
|Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors,
|Chief Executive Officer, and Director
EXHIBIT 32.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT



I, James D. Constantine, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Factory Card & Party Outlet Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended January 29, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
or 78o(d)); and



(2)  the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: April 22, 2005



/s/    JAMES D.
CONSTANTINEJames D. Constantine Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer
# C_2011172EN.01001502.xml

| 11.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6155 — Gem/Deme/Electrawinds Offshore/SRIWE/Z-KRACHT/Power@Sea/Rent a Port Energy/Socofe/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 172/05

On 6 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6155. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6155. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Resources Public 18-2008 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      14, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, SGS North America, Inc., 2 Avenue J, Bayonne, NJ 07002, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products, organic chemicals and vegetable oils for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of SGS North America, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on September 20, 2007. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for September 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Commercial Gauger Laboratory Program Manager, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: January 31, 2008.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 08-589 Filed 2-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-M
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO SECTION 13a-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
AND 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report
of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned, Michael W. Levin, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Michael W. Levin 
Michael W. Levin
Chief Executive OfficerJuly 22, 2005

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                               INKTOMI CORPORATION

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

C2B Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, doing business under the name
"Inktomi Corporation."

EScene Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation, doing business under the name
"Inktomi Corporation."

FastForward Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation, doing business under the
name "Inktomi Corporation."

Impulse! Buy Network, Inc., a California corporation, doing business under the
name "Inktomi Corporation."

Inktomi Australia Pty Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of
Australia, doing business as "Inktomi Australia Pty Limited."

Inktomi Canada Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of New
Brunswick, Canada, doing business as "Inktomi Canada Corporation."

Inktomi Japan KK, a corporation organized under the laws of Japan, doing
business as "Inktomi Japan KK."

Inktomi Korea Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Korea, doing
business as "Inktomi Korea Inc."

Inktomi Limited, a corporation organized under the laws of the United Kingdom,
doing business as "Inktomi Limited."

Inktomi SAS, a corporation organized under the laws of France, doing business as
"Inktomi SAS".

Inktomi SRL, a corporation organized under the laws of Italy, doing business as
"Inktomi SRL".

Ultraseek, Inc., a California corporation, doing business under the name
"Inktomi Corporation."

WebSpective Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation, doing business under the
name "Inktomi Corporation."

Inktomi Quiver Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, doing business under the
name "Inktomi Corporation."

Quiver Ltd., an Israeli corporation, doing business under the name "Inktomi
Corporation."
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 13 - 00226 - CR TERRELL EUGENE HICKS A/K/A TERRELL HICKS, APPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 297th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 1294857D, Honorable Everett Young, Presiding



### March 31 , 2014 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appellant, Terrell Eugene Hicks, entered a plea of guilty to the offense of burglary of a habitation 1 and was placed on two years deferred adjudication community service. The State subsequently filed a motion to adjudicate. After hearing the evidence and appellant’s plea, the trial court adjudicated appe llant guilty of the burglary of a habitation offense and, subsequently, sentenced appellant to a term of four years

1 See T EX . P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 30.02(a)(1) (West 2011).2

confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant gave notice of appeal. We will affirm. Ap pellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967). In support of his motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in h is opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated. Id

. at 744 - 45. In compliance with High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the trial court’s judgment. Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to wit hdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response in this matter. Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (en banc). The Court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response. Appell ant has not filed a response. By his Anders brief, counsel reviewed all grounds that could possibly support an appeal, but concludes the appeal is frivolous. We have reviewed the grounds suggested by counsel and made an independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any arguable grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We have found no such arguable grou nds and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.3

Accordingly, counsel = s motion to withdraw is hereby granted, and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed. 2 Mackey K. Hancock Justice
Do n ot publish.

2 Counsel shall, within five days after this opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of appellant = s right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 48.4.
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
345 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10154


Independent Auditors Consent






To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Lexington Tax Free Money Fund, Inc.:


We consent to the use of our report dated February 14, 1997 included in the
Registration Statement on Form N-1A and to the references to our firm under
the headings Financial Highlights and Counsel and Independent Auditors in
the Prospectus.




        /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

								KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
April 30, 1997
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the 

Subcommittee on Dose Reconstruction Reviews 

June 27, 2017 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

10:30 a.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll-call 

DISCUSSION

1. Review of outstanding cases from Sets 14-18 (26 issues; SRS, INL, BNL, 

WNFD, WR Grace, Bethlehem Steel, BONUS Reactor, Uranium Mill in 

Monticello and Ventron Corp.) 

2. Continuing review of backlog of Category 1 and 2 cases from Sets

19-21 (roughly 120 issues; Hanford, SRS, K-25, X-10, Y-12, Paducah, 

Portsmouth, FMPC, LANL, NTS, RFP, Pantex, PPG and Weldon Springs 

Plant). 

5:00 p.m. Adjourn
Uranium Energy Corp.: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com











	August 13, 2015 	Delivered and via e-mail 



Amir Adnani Corp. 

  c/o Suite
320, 1111 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, British
Columbia, Canada, V6E 2J3 Dear Amir: 

	Re: 
	Uranium Energy Corp. (the “Company”) 
	Amendment to Executive Services Agreement with the
Company 


As Chairman of the Company’s Compensation
Committee I am very pleased to report to you on the
recent determination of the Company’s Compensation
Committee, effective on August 1, 2015 (the “Effective
Date”), and with your prior concurrence, to increase
your current monthly “Fee” to U.S. $34,000.00 (from its current level of U.S. $30,000.00) under your
existing “Further Amended and Restated Executive
Services Agreement” with the Company, which is dated
for reference as fully executed on July 24, 2013
(collectively, the “Executive Services Agreement”); with
this letter agreement being an “Amendment” to
your Executive Services Agreement. 

I confirm that this Amendment is being
made in recognition of the considerable time and effort
that you have expended over the last several years in
guiding the Company through various stages of its
development and its corresponding funding
requirements and, in particular, the extensive travel schedule
that has been imposed on you personally as a
result. 

Correspondingly, and in order to hereby
formalize the referenced Amendment, we confirm
that the figure, “U.S. $30,000.00”, is hereby
deleted and replaced with the figure, “U.S.
$34,000.00”, in section 4.1 of your current Executive
Services Agreement. It is hereby recognized and
agreed that, other than for the Amendment set forth herein,
all other provisions of the e Executive Services Agreement
remain in full force and effect as of the Effective
Date hereof and, furthermore, that the Executive
Services Agreement, together with the within Amendment,
constitutes the entire agreement to date between the
parties hereto and supersede every previous agreement,
communication, expectation, negotiation, representation or
understanding, whether oral or written, express or implied,
statutory or otherwise, between the parties hereto with
respect to the subject matter of the Executive
Services Agreement. 

We kindly ask that you now acknowledge
your receipt and approval of the within Amendment to
your Executive Services Agreement by simply executing
and returning to the attention of the writer via facsimile
the duplicate copy of this letter which has been
enclosed for that purpose at your earliest
convenience hereafter. In the interim we remain,
always, Yours very truly, 


	/s/ Vincent Della Volpe 
	Vincent Della Volpe, Chairman of the
      Compensation Committee, 
	for
      Uranium Energy Corp. 



Receipt and approval of the within
Amendment is hereby acknowledged on this 13 day of
August, 2015, by: 


	/s/ Amir Adnani 
	Amir Adnani, President, 
	for
      Amir Adnani Corp.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 of Flurida Group, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 16, 2011
By:
/s/ Yaru HangYaru HangChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Flurida Group, Inc. and will be retained by Flurida Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.