alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.01

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,



As Adopted Pursuant to



Section
906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of iGate Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sunil Wadhwani, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 6, 2005



/s/    SUNIL WADHWANI

Sunil Wadhwani

Co-Chairman of the Board of Directors,

Chief Executive Officer, and Director
|   | (1) | To      my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      | SportsNuts, Inc. |                          |
|---------------------------|------------------|-------------------------------|
|                      |             |                          |   |
| Date:      March 31, 2009 | By:              | /s/       John D. Thomas |   |
|                      |             | John      D. Thomas      |   |
|                      |             | Chief      Executive Officer  |   |
|                      |             |                          |   |
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Mayquest Ventures, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                 /s/ William Tay
                                 ----------------------------
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: October 20, 2009
## NO. 12

- 23

- 00216

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

STATE AUTO MO BILE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY ,

RELATOR §

§

§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM

State Auto mobile Mutual Insurance Company f iled this original proceeding to challenge

Re spondent ’ s order denying i ts motion to qua sh the depos it ion of a cor po rate representative. 1
Relator filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this proceeding on grounds that the parties reached an agreement concerni ng the sub ject of the mandamus petitio n . Acc ordingly, we grant the

mot ion and dismiss the petition for writ of m an damus. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1. In ac cor dance with the agreement, costs are taxed against the party incurr ing same. We lif t our sta y of A ugust 23, 2023. Opinion delivered September 29, 2023

. Panel cons isted of W orthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

1 Respondent is the Honorable Steven Kirkl and, sitting by assignment in the 145th Judicial District Court of Nacogdoches County, Tex as. Kyle Doss is the Real Party in In terest.2 

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

SEPTEMBER 2 9 , 2023

NO. 12

- 23

- 0021 6

- CV

STATE AUTOMOBILE MUTU AL INSURAN CE COMPANY , Re lator V. HO N . JUDGE STEVEN KIR KLAND , Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the unopposed motion to dismiss th e petition for writ of

mandamus filed by State Automobile Mutual Insurance C o mpan y ; who is the rela tor in appellate

cause number 12

- 23

- 00 216

- CV and the defendant in trial c ourt cause number C2237672
, pending on the d ocket of the 1 45 th Judi cial District Court of Nacogdoches County , Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been filed herein o n August 22
, 2023 , and the same having been duly considered, because it is th e opin ion of this Court that the writ shoul d not issue
, it is

therefore C ONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said unopposed motion to

dismiss the petition for writ of mandamu s be, and the same is, gran ted and this proceeding is

dismissed

. Costs are t axed against the party incurring same.

B y p er curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J

.
EXHIBIT 5






September 10, 1997



Pro-Fac Cooperative, Inc.
90 Linden Oaks Officer Park
Post Office Box 682
Rochester, New York 14603

                     Re: Registration Statement on Form S-2

Ladies and Gentlemen:

       We have acted as your counsel in connection with a Registration Statement
on Form S-2 to be filed by you with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the
"Commission")   pursuant  to  the  Securities  Act  of  1933  as  amended.  Such
Registration  Statement  may be  amended,  from  time  to  time,  by one or more
amendments at the request of the Commission,  or on your own initiative,  either
before or after its effective date. The Registration  Statement as so amended or
to be amended,  covers the retains (the  "Retains")  and the shares of preferred
stock,  liquidation  preference $25 (the "Preferred Stock"), of Pro-Fac referred
to therein.

       We have examined originals or copies, identified to our satisfaction,  of
such documents and records of Pro-Fac,  and such other  documents and records as
we have deemed necessary, as a basis for the opinions hereinafter expressed.

       Based on the foregoing,  and having regard for such legal  considerations
as we have deemed relevant,  we are of the opinion that,  subject to an order or
other appropriate action by the Commission declaring the Registration  Statement
effective, the Retains and Preferred Stock of Pro-Fac, when issued in accordance
with the terms and conditions  set forth in the  prospectus  forming part of the
Registration Statement to be filed with the Commission (the "Prospectus"),  will
be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable, except that under the New York
Cooperative  Corporations  Law each  member and each  director of Pro-Fac may be
personally liable, jointly and severally,  for certain amounts owed to employees
for  services  rendered to Pro-Fac,  as described  in the  Prospectus  under the
caption  "Description of Pro-Fac Securities - Common Stock," and except that the
amount  of  outstanding  Non-Qualified  Retains  may be  subject  to  adjustment
subsequent  to  issuance,  as  described  in the  Prospectus  under the  caption
"Description of Pro-Fac Securities - Retains."

       We hereby  consent  to the  filing of this  opinion  as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement.

                                Very truly yours,

                                HARRIS BEACH & WILCOX LLP



                           By:  /s/ Richard D. Mathewson
                                    Richard D. Mathewson
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Spectrum Brands, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall J. Steward, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                          
|------ |  | -------------------------
|       |  | /s/    RANDALL J.
STEWARD
|Name:  |  | Randall J. Steward       
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer  



Date:
December 14, 2006



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. This certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 12

- 00135

- CV

In re Matinee Media Corporation, Magnolia Radio Corporation,

Rick Deitrick, and Greg Shapiro

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 9, 2012

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND MOTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF ARE

DENIED

On March 2, 2012, r elators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has

considered r elators’ petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that r elators are not

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relators’ motion for temporary relief and the petition

for writ of mandamus are DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. DC 11

- 322 , styled Eugenio Falcon, Antonio Falcon, Eloy Vera, Juan D.

Posada, Jose Vasques, Karina Mas corro, and William Smith v. Matinee Media Corp., Magnolia Radio Corp., Rick

Deitrick, and Greg Shapiro , pending in the 229th Judicial District Court

, Starr County, Texas, the The Honorable

Ana Lisa Garza presiding.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5884 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5884

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish unlawful obstruction 
of the enforcement of the laws of the United States by State officials, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 18, 2018

 Mr. King of Iowa (for himself and Mr. Gosar) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to punish unlawful obstruction 
of the enforcement of the laws of the United States by State officials, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mayor Libby Schaaf Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. OBSTRUCTION OF THE ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAWS OF THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    (a) Obstruction of the Enforcement of the Laws of the United 
States.--Chapter 73 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after section 1510 the following:
``Sec. 1510A. Obstruction of the enforcement of the laws of the United 
              States
    ``(a) It shall be unlawful for any officer, employee, or agent of a 
State or political subdivision thereof to obstruct, hinder, delay, or 
otherwise impede the enforcement of the laws of the United States, or 
to attempt to do so. Whoever violates this section shall be fined under 
this title or imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.
    ``(b) As used in this section--
            ``(1) the term `obstruct, hinder, delay, or otherwise 
        impede the enforcement of the laws of the United States' shall 
        include the purposeful broadcast by an officer, employee, or 
        agent of a State or political subdivision thereof of 
        information relating to any imminent action by a Federal law 
        enforcement officer or agent without regard to the manner in 
        which the broadcaster became aware of the imminent action; and
            ``(2) the term `State' means any of the several States, the 
        District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any 
        other territory or possession of the United States.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for such chapter is 
amended by inserting after the item relating to section 1510 the 
following:

``1510A. Obstruction of the enforcement of the laws of the United 
                            States.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Green Star Mining Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nan
E. Weaver, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
5th day of January, 2009.


/s/ Nan E. Weaver
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Daniel W. McKeel, Jr., MD

General Steel Industries (GSI)

SEC-00105 Co-petitioner

September 19, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of withdrawal of the Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

# SUMMARY:

The Forest Supervisor of the Caribou-Targhee National Forest gives notice of the agency's intent to withdraw the Centennial Salvage Timber Sale Environmental Impact Statement. The project is being withdrawn because the trees proposed for harvest are no longer marketable and the project, as originally proposed, no longer meets resource objectives.

                        The original NOI was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 9, 2004 (54627-54628). A revised NOI was published on December 1, 2004 (69883).                    

# DATES:

                        Effective upon the date of publication of this notice in the                         **Federal Register**                        , this project is withdrawn.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cathey Hardin, Forester, Ashton-Island Park Ranger District, P.O. Box 865, Ashton, ID 83420 Telephone: (208) 558-7301.

Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, Monday through Friday.

Dated: January 23, 2008.

Lawrence A. Timchak,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 08-514 Filed 2-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

my 9, 1939 

MS-S. Bays m3wwt, ?rosldsnt Stat8 LEaard of Coslletolo~ 

,LMit lxl , ;"exoa 
other prasoribed requirements. It the applicant 

was uhable to subait the nemtive teat althln o&e 

3ea.r after the date of the expiration 0r his or 

her lioense we think that he or she should stand 

in the sfme ;msition an a lwrson who ialla for 

8om other rsasm to rutairy r0r their liceme 

dthin that prlod of tirm. 

Your applloant .dght have waited 3aae 

iour, rive or sore yetis bercm being able to 

aub&t a negative test alow with the application 

r0lr a lioense fad in that event, itwoula hare 

been easier for the applicant to have ,%id the 

regular ten dollar I'@ pmsoiibed for an ariglnel 

nppliaent. Th+t leavss the choice wltbthe ap 

plioant as to the rmhner of ~uallrfoatlon r0r li08AS8. 7;~ do not think that such dlsoretion should 

rest ;rith the applioaht nor ilo :m ihlnk that the 

board may grant a liceme to suoh aapllaant by 

pernitting the appllioant to pap the past roes. 

IA acdltian to the reasms above ;;iven, it Is possible tht the applioitnt i;i&t, after waiting 

ror a period or yeera, in order to seaure e negatlve test be unfamlliur trith the xodexn nethods 

0r 0080a0i06~. 

t3eotion IB‘ or artiole 734b or the Pen&l 

COda #MksO PO pxOtilpiOn for a xen6Wti 1iCe~ 

after the expiratiou or one year iron the d&J or 

thbe cupikatioa 0r ths old lloen5e. Ir the applionnt doss not or oanriot qualify r0r a new lloonae 

within 010 yetlr rrf~~~ date or expir~~tioa 0r old 

lloense, We find no authority for lseuing what 

you tam a ourreht liaenss. 

Ih out opinion, an applloant ror a licenne th&..+33 unable to Avnish a negative Jasuerx.za.n teat along with the application d'urlng the 

year follawlng the expfrbiion of iils or her lioense but thereafter mas :~p?licatton mnt do 
i.253. aye :;tewart, ILay 9, 1939, pqe 3 

so 38 any othm now appUcant for n license as 

a22 operator.
Review of NIOSH’s Program 

Evaluation Report DCAS-PER-093, 

“Texas City Chemicals”

Kathy Behling, SC&A, Inc.

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health, 

Subcommittee for Procedure Reviews

September 29, 2022
2

DCAS-PER-093 purpose

Address the impacts of issuing revision 01 to the technical basis 

document (TBD) for Texas City Chemicals, DCAS-TKBS-0011, 

on previously completed cases 
3

Relevant historical TCC documents

Document issue date Document

January 18, 2008 SEC Petition ER SEC-0088, revision 00

July 18, 2008 SC&A’s draft review of SEC Petition SEC-0088 ER

October 19, 2010 SEC Petition ER SEC-0088, revision 01

November 17, 2010 SEC granted for SEC Petition SEC-0088

November 2, 2017 DCAS-TKBS-0011, revision 00

May 18, 2018 SC&A’s draft review of DCAS-TKBS-0011, revision 00

April 27, 2020 DCAS-TKBS-0011, revision 01

September 21, 2020 SC&A’s draft review of DCAS-TKBS-0011, revision 01
4

TCC timeline
5

Changes necessitating PER

 Revision 01 of the TBD provides updated residual ingestion 

intake rates that assume the initial residual ingestion intake 

rate is equal to the ingestion intake rate during uranium 

recovery operations

– Ingestion intakes increased from 1955 through 1977

– No other dose or intake values changed
6

PER selection criteria

Employment 

during 

residual 

period

POC 

below 50%

Targeted 

claims
7

PER selection criteria: Employment dates

Employment 

during 

residual 

period:

18 claims
8

PER selection criteria: POC

POC 

below 50%:

15 claims
9

PER selection criteria: Targeted claims

Targeted 

claims = 

14 total
10

NIOSH’s evaluation of impacted claims

 14 claims reevaluated

– 13 claims had new POC <45%

– 1 claim had a POC between 45% and 50%

– None found to increase POC above 50%

 No claims requested back from the Department of Labor (DOL)
11

Subtask 4 recommendation

 No cases were returned to DOL

 SC&A recommends a single case from the 14 impacted cases 

be selected for review

– Since one case is specifically called out as having a higher POC than 

the others, SC&A believes the case with a POC between 45 and 50% 

is the ideal choice for evaluation
12

Questions?
Exhibit 99.1(a)
                                                                 
ADVANTA                                 Advanta Mortgage
                                         Suite 400
                                         Fort Washington, PA 19034
                                         215-283-4200




     Report of Management on Compliance with Minimum Servicing Standards
                                

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1995, Advanta Mortgage
Corp. USA has complied in all material respects with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers. As of and for the same period, Advanta Mortgage Corp.
USA had in effect fidelity bond coverage in the amount of $10
million and mortgage contingent liability protection coverage in
the amount of $2 million.


\s\ William P. Garland         \s\ James L. Shreero
William P. Garland             James L. Shreero
Senior Vice President          Vice President
Loan Servicing                 Finance and Accounting