alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 17 (Friday, January 25, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 4449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-206]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 17 / Friday, January 25, 2008 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 4449]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2005-22489; Airspace Docket No. 05-AEA-017


Amendment to Class E Airspace; Du Bois, PA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date of a direct final rule 
that amends a Class E airspace area to support Area Navigation (RNAV) 
Global Positioning System (GPS) Special Instrument Approach Procedures 
(IAPs) that serve the Du Bois Regional Medical Center, Du Bois, PA.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December 20, 2007. The Director of the 
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 
Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual 
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daryl Daniels, Airspace Specialist, 
System Support, AJO2-E2B.12, FAA Eastern Service Center, 1701 Columbia 
Ave., College Park, GA 30337; telephone (404) 305-5881; fax (404) 305-
5572.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Confirmation of Effective Date

    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for 
comments in the Federal Register on October 30, 2007 (72 FR 61298-
61300). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non 
controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse 
public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no 
adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse 
comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse 
comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would 
become effective on December 20, 2007. No adverse comments were 
received, and thus this notice confirms that effective date.

    Issued in College Park, GA on December 17, 2007.
Mark D. Ward,
Manager, System Support Group, Eastern Service Center.
[FR Doc. 08-206 Filed 1-24-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
<PAGE>  

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO. 123 DATED                        Filed Pursuant to
SEPTEMBER 3, 1998 TO PROSPECTUS DATED                   Rule 424(b)(5)
SEPTEMBER 17, 1997, AS SUPPLEMENTED BY                  File No. 333-34087
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENTS DATED OCTOBER 1, 1997

                          CMS ENERGY CORPORATION

    General Term Notes (servicemark of J.W. Korth & Company), Series D
                Due 9 Months to 25 Years from date of issue

     Pursuant to the terms of a Distribution Agreement as supplemented by
certain letter agreements, the Company has appointed the Agents referred
to below as agents through which General Term Notes (servicemark of J.W.
Korth & Company) (the "Notes") may be offered by the Company on a
continuous basis.  Additional Agents may be designated under the
Distribution Agreement from time to time.  Except as set forth herein, the
Notes offered hereby have such terms as are described in the accompanying
Prospectus dated September 17, 1997, as supplemented by the Prospectus
Supplements dated October 1, 1997.

Aggregate Principal Amount:             $ 226,000.00
Original Issue Date 
  (Settlement Date):                    September 9, 1998
Stated Maturity Date:                   August 15, 2001
Issue Price to Public:                  100.00% of Principal Amount
Interest Rate:                          6.000% Per Annum
Interest Payment Dates:                 August 15 and February 15 and
                                        semi-annually thereafter
                                        Commencing February 15, 1999
Survivor's Option:                      [ X ] Yes    [   ] No
Optional Redemption:                    [    ] Yes   [X ] No


                                        Principal Amount of Notes
           Agent                        Solicited by Each Agent

Prudential Securities Incorporated      $  92,000.00
First of Michigan Corporation           $  15,000.00
J.W. Korth & Company                    $ 119,000.00
           Total                        $ 226,000.00


                                        Per Note Sold by
                                        Agents To Public        Total

Issue Price:                            $   1,000.00        $ 226,000.00
Agent's Discount or Commission:         $       5.00        $   1,130.00
Maximum Dealer's Discount or
  Selling Concession:                   $       7.50        $   1,695.00
Proceeds to the Company:                $     987.50        $ 223,175.00

CUSIP Number:  12589QZJ8
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 5499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-381]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Mendocino Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mendocino County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will 
meet February 15, 2008 in Willits, California. Agenda items to be 
covered include: (1) Approval of minutes, (2) Public Comment, (3) Sub-
committees, (4) Discussion--items of interest, (5) Discussion/approval 
of projects, (6) next agenda items and meeting date.

DATES: The meeting will be held on February 15, 2008, from 9 a.m. to 12 
noon.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Mendocino County Museum, 
located at 400 E. Commercial St., Willits, California.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo 
Road, Covelo, CA 95428. (707) 983-8503; e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d3f25383f390d2b3e632b282963383e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92e0fae7e0e6d2f4e1bcf4f7f6bce7e1">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Persons 
who wish to bring matters to the attention of the Committee may file 
written statements with the Committee staff by February 10, 2008. 
Public will have the opportunity to address the committee at the 
meeting.

    Dated: January 23, 2008.
Lee Johnson,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 08-381 Filed 1-29-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 

AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 124

Hilton Providence

21 Atwells Avenue, Providence, RI 02903

Hotel Phone: (401)-831-3900, Fax: (401)-274-1562

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537, Participant Code: 9933701# 

Skype Link: https://webconf.cdc.gov/zab6/yzdq02pl?sl=1 

Wednesday, August 22, 2018 

NOTE: All times in Eastern Time

8:30 a.m. – 8:45 a.m. Welcome, Introduction (POTUS designate), Chair

8:45 a.m. – 8:55 a.m. NIOSH Program Update Mr. Stuart Hinnefeld, NIOSH 

8:55 a.m. – 9:05 a.m. DOL Program Update Mr. Frank (Chris) Crawford, 

DOL 

9:05 a.m. –9:15 a.m. DOE Program Update Mr. Greg Lewis, DOE

9:15 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. Feed Materials Production 

Center (Fernald, OH) Site 

Profile Review

Mr. Brad Clawson, WG Chair

Mr. John Stiver, SC&A 

10:15 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Break

10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Sandia National Laboratory

Petition #188 (Albuquerque 

New Mexico; 1995-2011)

Mr. Chuck Nelson, NIOSH

Dr. Henry Anderson, WG

Chair

12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m. Lunch

1:30 p.m. – 1:45 p.m. SEC Petitions Status Update Mr. LaVon Rutherford, 

NIOSH

1: 45 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Board Work Session (POTUS Designate), Chair
2 

2:45 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. Procedure Reviews

(Estimating Skin Doses): 

OTIB 17 (Findings 7 & 15) & 

Overarching Issue 9 – 

(continued)

Dr. James Neton, NIOSH

3:15 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Break

3:30 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. Metals and Controls Corp. 

SEC Petition #236 (Attleboro 

MA, 1968-1997) Update

Ms. Josie Beach, WG Chair

Mr. Pete Darnell, NIOSH

Petitioner: 

5:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.* Public Comment

Adjourn 

* Public comment period will conclude at 6:00 p.m. or following the final call for public comment, 

whichever comes first. If you plan to comment, please be prepared to comment at 5:00 p.m. 

Thursday, August 23, 2018 

NOTE: All times in Eastern Time 

8:30 a.m. – 8:45 a.m. Welcome and Introduction (POTUS designate), Chair

8:45 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. INL SEC Petition #219 

(Scoville Idaho; 1963-1970) 

Mr. Philip Schofield, WG 

Chair

Dr. Timothy Taulbee, NIOSH 

Mr. Robert Barton, SC&A

Petitioners:

9:45 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. Pacific Proving Grounds 

(Marshall Islands) Site Profile 

Review (continued)

Dr. Jim Lockey, WG Chair

Dr. James Neton, NIOSH

10:15 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Break

10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. DeSoto Facility SEC Petition 

#246 (Los Angeles County, 

California; 1965-1995) 

Dr. Lara Hughes, NIOSH

Mr. Philip Scofield, WG Chair 

Petitioner:

12:00 p.m. Adjourn
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 58 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to submit 

a study on the circumstances which may impact the 

effectiveness and availability of first responders before, 

during, or after a terrorist threat or event, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 58 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Responder Iden3 tification of Emergency Needs in Disaster Situations’’ or 

4 the ‘‘FRIENDS Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH MAY IMPACT FIRST RE6 SPONDERS DURING A TERRORIST EVENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 1 year after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

9 of the United States shall submit to the Committees on 

10 Homeland Security and Transportation and Infrastruc11 ture of the House of Representatives and the Committee 

12 on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the 

13 Senate a report that describes select State and local pro14 grams and policies, as appropriate, related to the pre15 paredness and protection of first responders. The report 

16 may include information on— 

17 (1) the degree to which such programs and poli18 cies include consideration of the presence of a first 

19 responder’s family in an area impacted by a terrorist 

20 attack; 

21 (2) the availability of personal protective equip22 ment for first responders; 

23 (3) the availability of home Medkits for first re24 sponders and their families for biological incident re25 sponse; and 

26 (4) other related factors. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 58 RFS

1 (b) CONTEXT.—In preparing the report required 

2 under subsection (a), the Comptroller General of the 

3 United States may, as appropriate, provide information— 

4 (1) in a format that delineates high risk urban 

5 areas from rural communities; and 

6 (2) on the degree to which the selected State 

7 and local programs and policies included in such re8 port were developed or are being executed with fund9 ing from the Department of Homeland Security, in10 cluding grant funding from the State Homeland Se11 curity Grant Program or the Urban Area Security 

12 Initiative under sections 2002 and 2003, respec13 tively, of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 

14 U.S.C. 603 and 604). 

15 (c) HOMELAND SECURITY CONSIDERATION.—After 

16 issuance of the report required under subsection (a), the 

17 Secretary of Homeland Security shall consider such re18 port’s findings and assess its applicability for Federal first 

19 responders. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 31, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 APRIL 29, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-13295

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 07-22901-CV-MGC

ROBERT STEWART,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Jorge L. Pastrana, Warden,

ANTHONY RICHARDSON,

Unit Manager,

WENDALL CARR,

Case Manager,

MARK JONES,

Unit Counselor,

AUSA US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,

Respondents-Appellees.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(April 29, 2010)
Before MARCUS, PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Stewart, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the denial of his petition

for a writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Stewart argues that the district

court in its order of restitution allegedly delegated its authority to establish

restitution payments to the Bureau of Prisons and that the Bureau collected that

restitution illegally. Stewart is not entitled to relief. We vacate and remand for the

district court to dismiss Stewart’s petition.

After the district court denied Stewart’s petition, we held that an inmate

cannot attack collaterally an order of restitution using section 2241. Arnaiz v.

Warden, Fed. Satellite Low, 594 F.3d 1326 (11th Cir. 2010). Arnaiz was

convicted of conspiracy to launder money and sentenced to imprisonment and

restitution in excess of 24 million dollars. Id. at 1327. Arnaiz later filed a petition

for a writ of habeas corpus to challenge his order of restitution, and the district

court dismissed the petition on the ground that Arnaiz failed to satisfy the “savings

clause” of the statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, that ordinarily governs collateral attacks

of federal convictions. Id. at 1327–28. We agreed that a dismissal was

2
appropriate, but for another reason. Id. at 1328. We examined the historical

purpose of habeas corpus, and we recognized that its remedy “remains tied to some

form of relief from the petitioner’s custody.” Id. at 1328–29; see Preiser v.

Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484–85, 93 S. Ct. 1827, 1833 (1973). We held that

Arnaiz could not pursue habeas relief because “a successful challenge to the

restitution part of his sentence would, in no way, provide relief for the physical

confinement supplying the custody necessary for federal habeas jurisdiction.”

Arnaiz, 594 F.3d at 1329.

Based on Arnaiz, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider Stewart’s

petition. Stewart could not use a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “to challenge

just the restitution part of a sentence when the custody supporting our jurisdiction

is actual imprisonment.” Id. at 1330. We VACATE the order that denied

Stewart’s petition and REMAND for the district court to dismiss Stewart’s

petition.

VACATED and REMANDED.

3
**Exhibit 10.17**

**SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

**THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT** (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of the 24th day of February, 2009 (the “Effective Date”), by and betweenSpectrum Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) and David R. Lumley (the “Executive”). 

**WHEREAS**, the Companyand the Executive previously entered into that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated January 16, 2007 (the “Agreement”); and 

**WHEREAS**, the Company and the Executive wish to amend certain provisions of the Agreement in recognition of the Executive’s past services to the Company, new responsibilities and the importanceto the future success of the Company of the Executive’s continued services; and 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, in considerationof the premises and mutual agreements contained herein (promises that include benefits to which the Executive would not otherwise be entitled), and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,the Company and the Executive hereby agree as follows: 

1. Capitalized Terms not defined herein shall have the meanings given those terms inthe Agreement. 

2. As of the Effective Date, Executive’s Base Salary was Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000) per annum (the“Existing Base Salary Amount”). For the period from March 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 (the “Temporary Reduction Period”), Executive’s Base Salary shall be Five Hundred and Seventy Thousand Dollars ($570,000)per annum. As of January 1, 2010, Executive’s Base Salary shall return to the Existing Base Salary Amount. Notwithstanding this temporary reduction in Base Salary, for purposes of calculating any Bonus or other incentive plan amounts orany other benefit specified in the Employment Agreement or any other agreement between the Company and the Executive, including, without limitation, any severance benefits included therein, earned during the Temporary Reduction Period the ExistingBase Salary Amount shall be used as the Base Salary. 

3. Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and effect,and the execution of this Amendment shall not affect the rights of the Company or the Executive under the terms of the Agreement as in effect immediately prior to the Effective Date with respect to events occurring before the Effective Date.

**[Signature Page Follows]**

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the date firstabove written. 

 
SPECTRUM BRANDS, INC
/s/ Kent J. Hussey

By:
 Kent J. Hussey, Chief Executive Officer
 
EXECUTIVE:
/s/ David R. Lumley

Name:
 David R. Lumley
Order entered November 13 , 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01284
- CV KENNETH LEO BUHOLTZ, Appellant

V. STATE OF TEXAS, ET A L., Appellee s On Appeal from th e County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006
- 02337
- 2018



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s November 8, 2018 motion for extension of time to pay this Court’s filing fee and his November 9, 2018 affidavit of indigence

. App ellant is entitled to
pro ceed without costs in this Court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 20.1(b)(1). Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion TO THE EXTENT that the Court retracts its October 25, 2018 postcard
notice requesting payment of the $205 filing fee and i ts November 9, 2018 postcard notice requesting the $10 fee for filing the motion. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to designate appellant as indigent for purposes of this appeal.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period
ending March 31, 2009 of Lifestyle Choice Meals, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Andrea Worsley, Chairman, President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operation of the Company.



/s/ ANDREA WORSLEY
________________________________________
Andrea Worsley
President, Secretary Treasurer,
Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Director


Date: April 29, 2009
Status of Upcoming SEC Petiti

LaVon B. Rutherford, CHP

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

March 2013

Augusta, GA
Purpose

 Provide an update to the Advisory Board on 

current number of qualified petitions under

evaluation and sites being evaluated throug

83.14 process

 Provide SEC information to the Advisory Boa

support of its preparations for future Work G

sessions and Advisory Board meetings
SEC Summary Table

(as of February 25, 2013)

 Petitions received  Petitions in qualification process  Petitions qualified for evaluation 

• NIOSH evaluation in progress 0

• NIOSH evaluation completed 128

– SEC Evaluation Reports

with the Advisory Board

for recommendation 5

 Petitions not qualifying for evaluation Note: Petitions not qualifying include five petitions received prio

rule becoming final and Petition 34 where the site was de‐
SEC Petition Currently under Adv

Board Review

 Petition Evaluations the Advisory Board has 

action on, but are under continued evaluatio

• Feed Materials Production Center (Fernald)• Hanford• Pantex Plant

• Los Alamos National Laboratory

• Savannah River Site

• Brookhaven National Laboratory

• Baker Brothers

• Joslyn Manufacturing and Supply Co.
SEC Petition Currently under Adv

Board Review—cont.

 Petition Evaluations with the Advisory Board 

initial action:

• Rocky Flats Plant
Potential SEC Petitions (83.1

 Sandia National Laboratory – Albuquerque (

1948)

 General Atomics (modify existing class defin

 Dayton Project Monsanto (modify based on 

in facility designation)

• Modify based on change in facility designation t

facility

• Modify to add the 9 month period when operati

being shifted from “The Dayton Project” to Mou