alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex107.htm


Exhibit 10.7


 



CONSULTING AGREEMENT EXTENSION


 


The Consulting Agreement (the “Agreement”) made and entered into on 28th day of April 2014, by and between G2 International, Inc, a Texas corporation (“G2”) and Tiger Trade Technologies, Inc. a Texas corporation (the “Client”).


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


WHEREIN said agreement expires on the 28th day of April, 2015, and the parties desire to extend and continue said Agreement; it is provided that said Agreement shall be extended for an additional term of twelve months, commencing upon the expiration of the original term and expiring on the 28th day of April 2016.


 


IN WITNESS WHERE OF, the parties have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first above written notwithstanding the actual date of signatures.


 


 




 



	G2 International, Inc. 	Tiger Trade Technologies, Inc. 
	 	 
	By: /s/ Gust Kepler	By: /s/ Gust Kepler
	Gust Kepler, President 	Gust Kepler, President
# Official Journal L 90/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 90 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 596 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 90

English edition

Legislation

Volume 596 April 2016

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/486 of 29 March 2016 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for cyazofamid, cycloxydim, difluoroacetic acid, fenoxycarb, flumetralin, fluopicolide, flupyradifurone, fluxapyroxad, kresoxim-methyl, mandestrobin, mepanipyrim, metalaxyl-M, pendimethalin and tefluthrin in or on certain products (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/486 of 29 March 2016 amending Annexes II and III to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards maximum residue levels for cyazofamid, cycloxydim, difluoroacetic acid, fenoxycarb, flumetralin, fluopicolide, flupyradifurone, fluxapyroxad, kresoxim-methyl, mandestrobin, mepanipyrim, metalaxyl-M, pendimethalin and tefluthrin in or on certain products (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit
32


Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BNH Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nehemya Hesin,
Chief  Executive and Financial Officer of
the  Company,  certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 12, 2009
                    
                    /s/ Nehemya HesinNehemya
      HesinChief
      Executive and Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mobius Management Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mitchell Gross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/ Mitchell Gross
----------------------
Mitchell Gross
Chief Executive Officer
September 9, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of HALL TEES, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  May 13, 3011





/s/ William Lewis





Name: William Lewis


Title:  Chief Executive Officer











Dated:  May 13, 2011





/s/ William Lewis





Name: William Lewis


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3978

_____________________________

J.C., Mother of I.M. and S.R., 

Minor Children, 

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND 

FAMILIES,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Jonathan Sjostrom, Judge.

April 5, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, RAY, AND WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Crystal M. Frusciante, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil 

Regional Counsel, Region One, Sunrise, for Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Department of Children and Families, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Joanna Summers Brunell, Thomasina F. Moore, and Sara 

Goldfarb, Guardian Ad Litem Program, Tallahassee, for Guardian 

Ad Litem Program.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 113 (Wednesday, June 11, 2008)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 33289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1349]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 113 / Wednesday, June 11, 2008 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 33289]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2008-20 of June 4, 2008

                
Suspension of Limitations Under the Jerusalem 
                Embassy Act

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by 
                the Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 7(a) of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 
                1995 (Public Law 104-45) (the ``Act''), I hereby 
                determine that it is necessary, in order to protect the 
                national security interests of the United States, to 
                suspend for a period of 6 months the limitations set 
                forth in sections 3(b) and 7(b) of the Act. My 
                Administration remains committed to beginning the 
                process of moving our Embassy to Jerusalem.

                You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this 
                determination to the Congress, accompanied by a report 
                in accordance with section 7(a) of the Act, and to 
                publish the determination in the Federal Register.

                This suspension shall take effect after transmission of 
                this determination and report to the Congress. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 4, 2008.

[FR Doc. 08-1349
Filed 6-10-08; 11:02 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, James H. Welch, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2011



/s/ James H. WelchJames H. WelchChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Enc.

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

1150 Tusculum Ave

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH. 

 Albany, New York

MEMBERS

Henry Anderson, M.D. 

 Madison, Wisconsin 

Josie Beach 

 Kennewick, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson 

 Rexburg, Idaho 

R. William Field, Ph.D. 

 Iowa City, Iowa 

David Kotelchuck, Ph.D. 

 New York, New York 

Richard Lemen, Ph.D. 

 Canton, Georgia

James E. Lockey, M.D. 

 Cincinnati, Ohio 

Wanda I. Munn 

 Richland, Washington 

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D. 

 College Station, Texas 

David B. Richardson, Ph.D. 

 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D. 

 Elysian, Minnesota

Phillip Schofield

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico 

Loretta R. Valerio 

 Santa Fe, New Mexico 

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D.

 Lafayette, Indiana

STAFF

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Theodore M. Katz, MPA

 Atlanta, Georgia

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT 

Zaida Burgos

 Atlanta, Georgia

October 25, 2017

The Honorable Eric D. Hargan

Acting Secretary 

D epartment of Health and Human Services

200 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20201

Dear Acting Secretary Hargan:

The Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (The Board) has 

evaluated Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition 00175 concerning 

workers at the Grand Junction Facilities site in Grand Junction, Colorado, 

under the statutory requirements established by the Energy Employees 

Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 and 

incorporated into 42 C.F.R. § 83.13.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has 

recommended that individual dose reconstructions are feasible for:

“All employees of the Department of Energy, its predecessor 

agencies, and its contractors and subcontractors who worked at the 

Grand Junction Facilities site in Grand Junction, Colorado, during the 

period from January 1, 1986, through July 31, 2010.”

NIOSH found that it has access to adequate exposure monitoring and 

other information necessary to do individual dose reconstructions with 

sufficient accuracy for members of this group, and therefore a class 

covering this group should not be added to the SEC. The Board concurs 

with this determination.

Based on these considerations and the discussion at the August 23 and 

24, 2017, Board meeting held in Santa Fe, New Mexico, the Board agrees 

with the NIOSH recommendation that this class not be added to the SEC.

Enclosed is the documentation from the Board meeting(s) where this SEC 

class was discussed. The documentation includes copies of the petition, 

the NIOSH review thereof, and related materials. If any of these items are 

unavailable at this time, they will follow shortly.

Sincerely,

[Signature on File]

James M. Melius, M.D., Dr. PH.

Chairman, ABRWH

Enclosure
#### State Of West Virginia *v.*Kenneth Alan Dotson

(No. 14132)

Decided September 23, 1980.

*David M. Finnerin*for plaintiff-in-error.

*Chauncey H. Browning,*Attorney General, *Howard E. Kraukoph,*Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-in-error.

Per Curiam:

The appellant, Kenneth Alan Dotson, is appealing from a final judgment of the Circuit Court of Wood County committing him to the custody of the West Virginia Commissioner of Corrections pursuant to *W.Va. Code,*25-4-1, *et seq.,*upon his plea of guilty to an indictment charging him with breaking and entering. In entering this order, the Circuit Court of Wood County denied Dotson’s motion for probation. Dotson contends, among other things, that he was denied due process of law and effective assistance of counsel by the refusal of the trial *731court to permit his attorney to inspect the presentence investigation report prior to the pronouncement of sentence.

In *State v. Byrd,*163 W.Va. 248, 256 S.E.2d 323 (1979), this Court, under its inherent supervisory and rule-making powers, in the interest of fundamental fairness adopted, where applicable, Rule 32 (c)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Basically, that rule permits a criminal defendant or his attorney, in the discretion of the trial court, to read and comment on the presentence investigation report prior to the imposition of sentence.

On August 18, 1980, the State through its assistant attorney general and the defendant’s attorney filed a joint motion to dismiss based upon Rule 25(a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure on the ground that the parties had agreed that Dotson should be resentenced and afforded an opportunity to review the presentence investigation report prior to sentencing. In connection with the motion, counsel for the State represented that the Judge of the Circuit Court of Wood County had agreed to such resentencing and review.

In light of the foregoing motion and agreement, we are of the opinion that the judgment below should be reversed and the case remanded in accordance with the agreement. Where the parties in an appeal of a criminal case agree to afford the relief sought by the appeal and jointly move this Court to dismiss the appeal pursuant to Rule 25(a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, this Court will treat such motion as a confession of error and will reverse the case in accordance with the agreement of the parties and remand for further proceedings consistent with that agreement.

*Reversed and remanded.*
# C_2010326EN.01001601.xml

| 3.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/16

---

Special Report No 8/2010 ‘Improving transport performance on trans-European rail axes: Have EU rail infrastructure investments been effective?’

2010/C 326/08

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 8/2010 ‘Improving transport performance on trans-European rail axes: Have EU rail infrastructure investments been effective?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of IX Energy Holdings, Inc.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Steven Hoffmann, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








May 24,
      2010
            /s/Steven HoffmanSteven
      HoffmannChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP 303 East Wacker Drive Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended September30, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, George J. Carter, President and principal executive officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:


(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: November 12, 2010
/s/ George J. Carter

President

(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit




Exhibit 10.24


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
2010 Restatement


WHEREAS, Energizer Holdings, Inc., a corporation duly organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Missouri (“Company”), previously established the Energizer Holdings, Inc.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“Plan”); and


WHEREAS, the Energizer Plans Administrative Committee (“EPAC”) has authority pursuant to Section 4.4 of the Plan to amend the Plan and desires to amend the Plan to reflect that
all benefit accruals are frozen as of December 31, 2013;


NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the close of December 31, 2013, the Plan is amended as follows:


1.    A new paragraph is added at the end of the introduction to read as follows:


“Effective January 1, 2014, eligibility and benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan were frozen. Therefore, service and Compensation earned after December 31, 2013 do not
provide for additional benefit accruals under the Retirement Plan. By operation of the terms
of this Plan, since no benefits shall accrue under the Retirement Plan after December 31,
2013, no service or Compensation earned after December 31, 2013 shall increase the benefit
of an Employee eligible to participate in this Plan after such date or allow any Employee to gain eligibility for this Plan after such date. The Plan is frozen as of January 1, 2014.”


2.    Section 1.7 is amended by adding the following to the end thereof:


“Since no compensation earned after December 31, 2013 shall count for any purpose under the Retirement Plan, compensation earned after that date shall not count for any purpose
under this Plan.  The Plan is frozen as of January 1, 2014.”


3.    Section 3.1(a) is amended by adding the following to the end thereof:


“Since no compensation or service earned after December 31, 2013 shall count for any purpose under the Retirement Plan, compensation and service earned after that date shall
not count for any purpose under this Plan.  The Plan is frozen as of January 1, 2014.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by a duly authorized executive of the
Company as of the date below.


ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC.


By      


Title     


Date
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6384
SAMUEL DAVID JOHNSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA STATE PAROLE BOARD, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-96-210-R) Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 5, 1996 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel David Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Virginia State Parole Bd. , No. CA-96-210-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED