alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Michael R. Kulcheski, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Neohydro
      Technologies Corp. for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Neohydro Technologies Corp.                                                                 

Dated: May 17, 2011

| | /s/ Michael R. Kulcheski                                            
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Michael R. Kulcheski                                                
| | President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director                        
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer, and
| | Principal Accounting Officer)                                       
| | Neohydro Technologies Corp.                                         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Neohydro
Technologies Corp. and will be retained by Neohydro Technologies Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

             CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-91453 of Quintus Corporation on Form S-8 our reports dated April 18, 2000
(May 18, 2000 as to Note 14) on the consolidated financial statements of Quintus
Corporation for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2000 and 1999, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quintus Corporation for the year ended March
31, 2000.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

San Jose, California
May 31, 2000
1

AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 98

Augusta Marriott

2-10th Street, Augusta, GA 30901

Phone: (706) 722-8900; Fax: (706)-724-0044

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537, Participant Code: 9933701#

LiveMeeting Link:

https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/cdc/join?id=7CSBK8&role=attend&pw=ABRWH;

Meeting ID: 7CSBK8 Entry Code: ABRWH

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

NOTE: All times in Eastern Time

8:15 a.m. – 8:30 a.m. Welcome and Introduction Dr. James Melius, Chair

8:30 a.m. – 8:50 a.m. NIOSH Program Update Mr. Stuart Hinnefeld, NIOSH 

8:50 a.m. – 9:10 a.m. DOE Program Update Dr. Patricia Worthington, 

Mr. Greg Lewis, DOE

9:10 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. DOL Program Update Mr. Jeff Kotsch, DOL

9:30 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. SEC Petitions Status Update Mr. LaVon Rutherford, 

NIOSH 

9:45 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Sufficient Accuracy/Coworker 

Dose Modeling

Dr. James Melius, SEC Issues 

Work Group (WG) Chair

Dr. James Neton, NIOSH

10:30 a.m. – 10:45 a.m. Break

10:45 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Nuclear Metals Inc. SEC 

Petition (1980-1990)

Dr. Samuel Glover, NIOSH

Petitioner(s):

12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m. Lunch

1:30 p.m. –2:30 p.m. Joslyn Manuf. & Supply Co. 

SEC Petition (August 1948-

1952)

Dr. Samuel Glover, NIOSH

Dr. Paul Ziemer, TBD 6000 

WG Chair

Petitioner(s):
2

2:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Board Work Session Dr. James Melius, Chair 

4:00 p.m. – 4:15 p.m. Break

4:15 p.m. – 5:15 p.m. Savannah River Site SEC 

Petition WG Update

Dr. Tim Taulbee, NIOSH

Mr. Mark Griffon, WG Chair

Petitioner(s):

5:15 p.m. – 6:15 p.m.* Public Comment

6:15 p.m. Adjourn

*Note: The public comment period may end before 6:15 p.m., following the last call for

comments.
Exhibit 32
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of E-Dispatch Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Roderick Macutay, Chief
Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |  |                                             
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: November 11, 2008 |  | By: /s/ Roderick Macutay                    
|                        |  | Roderick Macutay                            
|                        |  | Chief Executive and Chief
 Financial Officer

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 24, 2017

No. 04-12-00294-CR

Vanessa CAMERON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010CR4286C

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

State’s first motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. The State’s brief is 

due on February 21, 2017. 

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of January, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FSP 303 East Wacker Drive Corp. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, George J. Carter, President and principal
executive officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to his knowledge:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: November 6, 2009
/s/ George J. Carter
George J. Carter
President
(Principal Executive Officer)
V

-r^TT.T. C3rPif- ft^k/K.

,Moli RECEIVEDJH

&&L&A32&- COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Itaccgsc-C-CoLetp^JbLTS**0 MAY 06 2015

sf

^£^^k^_Cc^^a^-/L^; 6k-/*/ -coH&jUL

CloJSSA^kteJ^

Tf^C^nai^i Ar^/^Y ^vicg./^yl

|>a\U |0^p6A5 (^Wv^^ 4o4Vo<; rv^sr J^£D_/.^k<x,e //ife^

aMes\4^ -fo^rU,V KVi^J^r,^..

_W___' • ^kCg/v^ ty

fe£=^ Dvs-S /^C^on/g-'J
VS. '

fx %$$>{* 1 §M*i 4V OolsAt e>£ %&Jr W-lhp

&V|m fij^r;^'pVte*as ai'Ta^rl?*^

Afpt\i£&d^^

/ ^—- —•

Lovyu ckiU h, dgv4^c4- cA Cc^y. «v6: CS01907 s)y/ed\.

7lW,5j^c a^l^s^s a CW^/a/isr fW(. ^cfe^igcv/-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF THE COMPANY
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-01-1998
<CASH>                                             610
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,276
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,912
<PP&E>                                         312,451
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 341,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,215
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           405
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,949
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   341,022
<SALES>                                         72,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,876
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,172)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (52,598)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,381)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,217)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,217)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.22)
        

</TABLE>
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** The Honorable Wesley E. Brown, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### DEC 3 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES ROSS MANGRUM and ALAN MONTIERTH, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. No. 96-4164 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, a Colorado Corporation; COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, a labor organization; COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA DISTRICT 7, an administrative unit of a labor organization; and COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA LOCAL NO. 7704, a unit of a labor organization, Defendants-Appellees. (D.C. No. 95-CV-587) (UTAH) (961 F. Supp. 1510)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BALDOCK and BRORBY, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, Senior District Judge. **

Plaintiffs Charles Mangrum and Alan Montierth brought consolidated actions2

against Defendants U.S. West Communications and Communications Workers of America, alleging violations of § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act. Plaintiffs, both union members and employees of U.S. West, claimed that U.S. West breached the collective bargaining agreement and the Union breached its duty of fair representation in a dispute over Plaintiffs “primary reporting place.” Plaintiffs also claimed intentional infliction of emotional distress. In a thorough opinion, the district court granted both Defendants summary judgment on all claims. Mangrum v. U.S. West Communications,
Inc. , 961 F. Supp. 1510 (D. Utah, 1996). Plaintiffs appeal. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo and apply the same standard as the district court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). Taken v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm’n , 125 F.3d 1366, 1368 (10th Cir. 1997). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, pleadings, affidavits, and the entire record before us. We believe the district court properly granted summary judgment to Defendants, and affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in its Memorandum Decision and Order Granting Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment.
AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court, Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 137

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537, Participant Code: 9933701# 

Skype Link: https://webconf.cdc.gov/zab6/yzdq02pl?sl=1 

Tuesday, December 8, 2020

NOTE: All times in Eastern Time

1:15 p.m. – 1:30 p.m. Welcome (Designate), Chair

1:30 p.m. – 1:45 p.m. NIOSH Program Update Mr. Grady Calhoun, NIOSH

1:45 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. DOL Program Update Mr. Frank (Chris) Crawford, 

DOL

2:00 p.m. – 2:15 p.m. DOE Program Update Mr. Greg Lewis, DOE

2:15 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. Update on Y-12 Plant SEC 

Petition 250 (Oak Ridge, 

Tennessee; 1987 - 1994)

Dr. Bill Field, WG Chair

Mr. Bob Barton, SC&A 

3:15 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Break

3:30 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Board Work Session (Designate), Chair

4:30 p.m. – 5:30 p.m. Update on Area IV Santa 

Susanna Field Laboratory 

SEC Petition 235 (Ventura 

County, California; 1991-

1993) & Desoto Avenue SEC 

Petition 246

Mr. Phil Schofield, Chair, 

SSFL Work Group, Mr. Bob 

Barton, SC&A 

5:30 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.* Public Comment

Adjourn
Wednesday, December 9, 2020 

1:15 p.m. – 1:30 p.m. Welcome (Designate), Chair

1:30 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. SEC Petitions Status Update 

& SEC Qualifications 

Process

Mr. LaVon Rutherford, 

NIOSH

2:00 p.m. – 3:15 p.m. Savannah River Site SEC 

Petition 103 (Aiken, South 

Carolina; October 1972 – 

2007) 

Mr. Brad Clawson, Chair, 

SRS Work Group 

Dr. Tim Taulbee, NIOSH

Mr. Joe Fitzgerald, SC&A 

SEC Petitioner(s): ***

3:15 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Break

3:30 p.m. – 5:30 p.m. Savannah River Site SEC 

Petition 103 (Aiken, South 

Carolina; October 1972 – 

2007) 

Mr. Brad Clawson, Chair, 

SRS Work Group 

Dr. Tim Taulbee, NIOSH

Mr. Joe Fitzgerald, SC&A 

SEC Petitioner(s): ***

Adjourn

* Public comment period will conclude at 6:30 p.m. or following the final call for public comment, 

whichever comes first. If you plan to comment, please be prepared to comment at 5:30 p.m.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 United States Code Section 1350, 
As adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the 
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to such officers knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006 of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. (the Company) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such annual report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |        |                                
| | ------ | -------------------------------
| |        | /s/ Francisco Tosta Valim Filho
| |        |                                
| | Name:  | Francisco Tosta Valim Filho    
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer        
| | Date:  | March 8, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 06-7506 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO GERMAINE JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District

Judge. (4:02-cr-00579-CWH; 4:06-cv-00606-CWH)

Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 3, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Germaine Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. William Earl Day, II,

Rose Mary Parham, Assistant United States Attorneys, Florence,

South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Germaine Johnson seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Johnson’s motion

for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
April 12, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JONAS SMITH, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00037-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 10.10

 

 

 

Limitation of Director Compensation

 

Due to restrictions on the amount of outside compensation permitted as a condition of Janice M.  Hamby’s employment with the National Defense University, she agrees that the maximum annual compensation she will receive as a member of the Board of Directors of Cubic Corporation will be $27,225.

 

This limit will remain in effect so long as she is an employee of the U.S. Government or until she and Cubic Corporation have been notified that the limit has changed, or no longer applies.

 

Cubic Corporation agrees to take such necessary actions to ensure that the compensation paid to Admiral Hamby does not exceed the above limitation, or such other limitation which may be applicable from time to time.

 

	
Dated:  September 1, 2015
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Cubic   Corporation
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:   
    	
/s/   James R. Edwards
    	
 
    	
/s/   Janice M. Hamby
    
	
James   R. Edwards
    	
Janice   M. Hamby
    
	
Senior   Vice President,
    	
Director
    
	
 General   Counsel & Secretary
    	
 
    
				


 

 

9333 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, CA 92123 · P.O. Box 85587, San Diego, CA 92186-5587

858-277-6780 · Fax 858-277-1876

www.cubic.com · NYSE: CUB
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
 AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT.
 ACTION: List of Applications Delayed more than 180 days.
 SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c), PHMSA is publishing the following list of special permit applications that have been in process for 180 days or more. The reason(s) for delay and the expected completion date for action on each application is provided in association with each identified application.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Delmer F. Billings, Director, Office of Hazardous Materials Special Permits and Approvals, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-4535.
                        ( print page 3803) Key to “Reason for Delay” 1. Awaiting additional information from applicant. 2. Extensive public comment under review. 3. Application is technically complex and is of significant impact or precedent-setting and requires extensive analysis. 4. Staff review delayed by other priority issues or volume of special permit applications. Meaning of Application Number Suffixes N—New application. M—Modification request. PM—Party to application with modification request. Issued in Washington, DC, on January 16, 2008. Delmer F. Billings Director, Office of Hazardous Materials, Special Permits and Approvals.
 Modification to Special Permits
Application No.
Applicant
Reason for 
                                 delay
Estimated 
                                 date of  
                                 completion11579-M
Austin Powder Company, Cleveland, OH
3, 4
02-29-2008.10964-M
Kidde Aerospace & Defense, Wilson, NC
4
02-29-2008.
 New Special Permit Applications
Application No.
Applicant
Reason for 
                                 delay
Estimated 
                                 date of  
                                 completion14385-N
Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Kansas City, MO
4
02-29-2008.14546-N
BOC Gases, Murray Hill, NJ
4
02-29-2008.14402-N
Lincoln Composites, Lincoln, NE
1, 3
01-31-2008.14436-N
BNSF Railway Company, Topeka, KS
4
02-29-2008.


[FR Doc. 08-202  Filed 1-18-08; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-60-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

SHANE BOZEMAN, SR., DOC #577318, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4675 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed August 16, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Thomas Krug, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Dane K. Chase, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeffrey H. Siegal, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.