alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of New  Generation  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.


                                        /s/ Jacques Mot
                                        -------------------------------
                                        Jacques Mot
                                        Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                        Financial Officer
                                        New Generation Holdings, Inc.

March 16, 2005

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to New Generation Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by New Generation
Holdings,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2134

CHRISTOPHER A. BURKE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

G. T. WILLIAMS; L. A. CORNER, Court and Legal

Services; E.M.G., Court and Legal Services;

MS. MORTON, Records Dept., Lunenburg Correctional Center; E. PRESTON GRISSOM, Judge,

First Judicial Circuit of Virginia; RANNIE C.

BROWN, Secretary of Judge,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-99-863)

Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 27, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher A. Burke, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Burke seeks to appeal the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his complaint alleging violations of

due process and equal protection. Burke has filed a motion in this

court to enjoin the Virginia Department of Corrections and the

Circuit Courts of Chesapeake from executing Burke’s plea agreement.

We deny his motion and dismiss the appeal.

The district court dismissed Burke’s complaint without prejudice because Burke failed to comply with the court’s order to file

answers to interrogatories designed to particularize his complaint.

Such dismissal without prejudice is not generally appealable. See

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064,

1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Furthermore, we lack jurisdiction because Burke’s notice of

appeal was not timely filed. The district court’s order was

entered on its docket on July 19, 1999. Burke’s notice of appeal

was filed on August 19, 1999. Parties are accorded thirty days

after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note

an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1), unless the district court

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal

period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director,

Dep’t of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United

States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Because Burke
3

failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension

or reopening of the appeal period, we lack jurisdiction over the

appeal.

For these reasons, we dismiss Burke’s appeal and deny his motion for injunctive relief. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 4) PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 I, Paul Gerard Turner, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 4) PLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement. By: /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName: Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:   DirectorDate:   June 30, 2005
ABRWH

Agenda

Subcommittee on Procedures Review

Teleconference Meeting

April 25, 2013

Conference Call Number 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code 9933701

10:30 a.m. Welcome and Roll Call

10:40 BRS status re addition of Neton info NIOSH-Neton

10:50 PERs 0011 and 0030 follow up actions NIOSH

11:00 PERs – Case reviews for 0014 and 0017 SC&A –K. Behling

11:30 PROC 0044 response to findings NIOSH

12:00 Break

12:15p.m. PER-0020 - Status update SC&A – K.Behling

12:45 PER 0031 – review SC&A

1:15 Lunch

2:00 Draft review of RPRT 0053 SC&A

2:15 Review status –

PROC 031, 061, OTIB 0020, OTIB 005 SC&A

3:00 OCAS-PER 005 and PER 029 [Ziemer chairing] SC&A

3:20 OTIB 0055 responses NIOSH

3:45 Break

3:55 Status reports

PERs 0033, 0025, 0037, 0038 SC&A

4:15 OTIB 0037 – 02, 03, 04 – TBD revision status NIOSH

4:45 OTIB 0054 status report on revision NIOSH

5:10 IG-003 Rev.1 and PER 0027 record check Munn

5:15 Administrative detail All 

5:20 Adjourn
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as chief financial officer of AGY Holding Corp. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2009 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Wayne T. Byrne           
|Wayne T. Byrne               
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: May 14, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AGY Holding Corp. and will be retained by AGY Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ORAUT-OTIB-0088

External Dose Reconstruction

Report from the Subcommittee for Procedure Reviews (SCPR)

Presented to the

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Oakland, California

December 11, 2019

1
ORAUT-OTIB-0088, “External Dose Reconstruction”

ORAUT-OTIB-0088 outlines external dose reconstructions (DRs) under Part B of the 

Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000. This 

document incorporates direction from NIOSH on the performance of external DRs 

as contained in OCAS-IG-001, “External Dose Reconstruction Implementation 

Guideline,” technical information bulletins, approved site profiles, and Oak Ridge 

Associated Universities Team procedures.

• Revision 00: Issued September 14, 2018, to convert ORAUT-PROC-0006, “External 

Dose Reconstruction,” to an OTIB and incorporate guidance on the assignment of 

onsite ambient dose to facilitate the cancelation of ORAUT-PROC-0060.

• Revision 01: Issued October 21, 2019, to correct error in Attachment A, “Method 

for Assigning Missed Dose when the Number of Null Results is Unknown,” and 

add a new attachment providing dates when DOE sites incorporated ICRP 

Publication 60 recommendations for neutron weighting factors.

• SC&A was tasked to review Revision 00. The review was submitted January 8, 

2019, and contained two observations.

2
Observation 1: OTIB-0088 does not incorporate informative guidance in 

ORAUT-PROC-0060, Attachment A, “External Onsite Ambient Dose 

Assignment for Monitored Site Employees”; Attachment B, “Maximizing 

Dose Summary”; and Attachment C, “Methods for Assigning Site-Specific 

Best Estimates of External Onsite Ambient Doses.” These attachments help 

to ensure the DR process is conducted in a consistent manner.

• NIOSH response:

• The information provided in the PROC-0060 attachments will not be lost; it will 

be incorporated into other procedures or site-specific TBDs.

• NIOSH did question whether this approach would make the information less 

useful or less easy to find. They stated that they would like to consider whether it 

is better to consolidate it in one place or incorporate it into individual TBDs.

• Resolution as of February 13, 2019: The SCPR found NIOSH’s response acceptable 

and closed this finding. However, the SCPR requested that NIOSH inform the 

Subcommittee of their decision on where the PROC-0060 guidance would be 

placed. NIOSH subsequently determined that the PROC-0060 guidance would be 

incorporated into the site-specific TBDs.

3
Observation 2: Attachment A of OTIB-0088 provides instructions that 

state the 95th percentile missed dose is calculated by multiplying the 

number of zeros by the LOD value. However, the example calculation 

shows the dose was calculated using the LOD/2.

• NIOSH agreed that the Attachment A example calculation was in error 

and the document would be corrected in the next revision.

• NIOSH published Revision 01 of OTIB-0088 on October 21, 2019, 

which corrects the Attachment A error. 

• Resolution as of February 13, 2019: The SCPR agreed with NIOSH’s 

resolution to the document error and closed the observation.

4
Questions?

5
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of First China
Pharmaceutical Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Zhen Jiang Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | i.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                               
| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results
  of                             

Date: August 20, 2012

|/s/ Zhen Jiang
      Wang                                          | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|Name: Zhen Jiang Wang                                              | 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
      Officer) | 

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Algoil, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Kovalenko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  November 12, 2009                                                    | By:  /s/ Andrew Kovalenko
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------
|                                                                           
|Andrew Kovalenko                                                           
|Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer 
(Principle Executive Officer)
Exhibit
32.01





Section
906, Certification of the CEO





CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ServisFirst Bancshares,
Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





Date:
      July 30, 2009
                By:
                /s/  Thomas A. Broughton,
      IIIThomas A. Broughton, IIIPresident and Chief Executive
Officer





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the registrant and will
be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-12-00210- CV

Jeff rey ( Tre) Krueger , Appellan t

v. CRU Energy, Inc.; Michael Torr es; Jor ge Z uni ga; and Gre en Alt. Cor poration, App ellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 201 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 1-0 0168 0, H ONO RAB LE AMY CLARK MEACH UM, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The cler k’s rec ord in this appea l is overdue to be filed. This Court’s cler k sent a letter dated May 5, 2012, to appellant J eff ery (Tre ) Krue g er reque sting that he make arr ang ements to pay for the cler

k’s rec ord and that he file a status repor t r eg arding this a

ppeal with this Court. Krue g er
was re quested to file a

status report on or

befor e May

15, 2012, or risk dismissal of his appeal. May 15, 2012, has passed. The cler k’s rec ord has not been filed, and Krue g er has not filed a status r eport with this Court. Acc ording ly , we dismiss this a ppeal for want of prosec ution. SeeTex. R. App. P . 37.3(b), 42.3( b)._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: Jul y

20, 2012

2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5720 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5720

  To deauthorize a portion of a project in California, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2018

Mr. Calvert (for himself, Mrs. Torres, and Mr. Aguilar) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To deauthorize a portion of a project in California, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LYTLE AND CAJON CREEKS, CALIFORNIA.

    That portion of the channel improvement project, Lytle and Cajon 
Creeks, California, authorized to be carried out as a part of the Santa 
Ana River, California Project, that consists of five earth-filled 
groins commonly referred to as ``the Riverside Avenue groins'' shall no 
longer be authorized as a Federal project as of the date of enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee will hold a meeting on February 15, 2008 at the U.S. Forest Service Office, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150. This Committee, established by the Secretary of Agriculture on December 15, 1998 (64 FR 2876), is chartered to provide advice to the Secretary on implementing the terms of the Federal Interagency Partnership on the Lake Tahoe Region and other matters raised by the Secretary.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held February 15, 2008, beginning at 8:30 a.m. and ending at 10:30 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the U.S. Forest Service Office, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Arla Hains, Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit, Forest Service, 35 College Drive, South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150, (530) 543-2773.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Items to be covered on the agenda include: (1) Aquatic Invasive Species update; (2) SNPLMA Round 9; and, (3) Public Comment. All Lake Tahoe Basin Federal Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend at the above address. Issues may be brought to the attention of the Committee during the open public comment period at the meeting or by filing written statements with the secretary for the Committee before or after the meeting. Please refer any written comments to the Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit at the contact address stated above.

Dated: January 25, 2008.

Terri Marceron,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 08-462  Filed 2-1-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 16.1





March 20, 1998



Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We were previously the principal accountants for Core-Mark International, 
Inc. and, under the date of February 20, 1998, we reported on the 
consolidated financial statements of Core-Mark International, Inc. and 
subsidiaries (the Company) as of and for the years ended December 31, 1997 
and 1996.  On January 27, 1998, the Company determined not to engage KPMG 
Peat Marwick LLP as the independent public accountants for its 1998 fiscal 
year.  We have read the Company's statements included in Item 9 of its Form 
10-K dated March 20, 1998, and we agree with such statements, except that we 
are not in a position to agree or disagree with the Company's statements that 
the change was approved by the Board of Directors or the Company's statements 
in the seventh paragraph of Item 9 of the aforementioned Form 10-K.

                                       Very truly yours,

                                       /s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
ex-10.1

 PROMISSORY NOTE
 

 

  April 28, 2014
 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Nogales Resources Corp., a Nevada Corporation, promises to pay Misael Velasco Aguirre, on or before December 31, 2018, the amount of Twenty Three Thousand Dollars ($23,000.00) in the currency of the United States, plus simple interest on the principal amount of this Promissory Note accrued at a rate of 6% per annum.
 

 Time shall be the essence of this Promissory Note.
 

 This Promissory Note shall be governed by and constituted in accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada.
 

 

 NOGALES RESOURCES CORP.
 

 

 Per /s/ Misael Velasco Aguirre
      Misael Velasco Aguirre, Pres., CEO, CFO