alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5970 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 11, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to carry 

out a cost benefit analysis of the use of Form 10-Q 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5970 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Modernizing Disclo3 sures for Investors Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FORM 10–Q ANALYSIS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Securities and Exchange 

6 Commission shall conduct an analysis of the costs and 

7 benefits of requiring reporting companies to use Form 10– 

8 Q for submitting quarterly financial reports. Such analysis 

9 shall consider— 

10 (1) the costs and benefits of Form 10–Q to 

11 emerging growth companies; 

12 (2) the costs and benefits of Form 10–Q to the 

13 Commission in terms of its ability to protect inves14 tors, maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets, 

15 and facilitate capital formation; 

16 (3) the costs and benefits of Form 10–Q to 

17 other reporting companies, investors, market re18 searchers, and other market participants, including 

19 the costs and benefits associated with— 

20 (A) the public availability of the informa21 tion required to be filed on Form 10–Q; 

22 (B) the use of a standardized reporting 

23 format across all classes of reporting compa24 nies; and 

25 (C) the quarterly disclosure by some com26 panies of financial information in formats other 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 5970 RFS 

1 than Form 10–Q, such as a quarterly earnings 

2 press release; 

3 (4) the costs and benefits of alternative formats 

4 for quarterly reporting for emerging growth compa5 nies to emerging growth companies, the Commission, 

6 other reporting companies, investors, market re7 searchers, and other market participants; and 

8 (5) the expected impact of the use of alternative 

9 formats of quarterly reporting by emerging growth 

10 companies on overall market transparency and effi11 ciency. 

12 (b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 

13 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission 

14 shall issue a report to Congress that includes— 

15 (1) the results of the analysis required by sub16 section (a); and 

17 (2) recommendations for decreasing costs, in18 creasing transparency, and increasing efficiency of 

19 quarterly financial reporting by emerging growth 

20 companies. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 10, 2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of  Innovative Wireless Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:




The Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Pavel AlpatovBy:
Pavel AlpatovTitle:
President and Director andChief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officer andPrincipal Accounting OfficerDate:  March 8, 2011
Enc. 

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN:

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D. 

 Lafayette, Indiana 

MEMBERS:

Josie Beach 

 Richland, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson 

 Rexburg, Idaho 

Michael H. Gibson 

 Franklin, Ohio 

Mark A. Griffon 

 Salem, New Hampshire 

James E. Lockey, M.D. 

 Cincinnati, Ohio 

James M. Melius, M.D., Ph.D. 

 Albany, New York 

Wanda I. Munn 

 Richland, Washington 

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D. 

 College Station, Texas 

Robert W. Presley 

 Seymour, Tennessee 

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D. 

 Elysian, Minnesota 

Phillip Schofield 

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico 

STAFF:

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY:

Theodore M. Katz, MPA 

 Atlanta, Georgia 

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT :

Zaida Burgos 

 Atlanta, Georgia 

August 30, 2009 

The Honorable Brian Higgins 

United States House of Representatives 

431 Cannon House Office Building 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Congressman Higgins: 

This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of June 4, 2009 concerning the Special 

Exposure Cohort petition from the Bethlehem Steel Claimants Action Group. Copies of 

the letter have been distributed to all of the members of the Advisory Board on 

Radiation and Worker Health, and the letter was also read into the public record during 

the Board’s recent meeting on July 27, 2009 in Cincinnati, Ohio. 

You specifically requested that the Board consider having one of its upcoming meetings 

in Buffalo, New York so that members of the Claimants Action group would have an 

opportunity to interact with the Board and convey their concerns about the Energy 

Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA). We 

appreciate the invitation to return to Buffalo for a meeting, and we will seriously 

consider it as a meeting site for one of our meetings in the year ahead. 

We are aware of the fact that many claimants have experienced frustration with regard 

to both the time that has been required to evaluate claims and petitions as well as the 

processes involved in evaluating and completing actions on claims. As you know, 

NIOSH and the Board have reviewed a number of issues relating to the Bethlehem Steel 

claims over the past few years. Also, during this time, a large number of the Bethlehem 

Steel claims have been processed. As of July 29, 2009, some 824 cases were sent to 

NIOSH by the Department of Labor for dose reconstruction and 795 of these cases have 

had dose reconstructions completed. We note that 382 (48 %) of the Bethlehem Steel 

claimants who have undergone dose reconstruction have been compensated through the 

EEOICPA program. 

The Board also approved sending copies of this letter to your colleagues who cosigned 

the letter of June 4. 

Thank you for your continued interest in the EEOICPA program and the activities of 

this Board. 

 Sincerely, 

 [Signature on file.] 

 Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D. 

 Chairman, ABRWH
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,490

EX PARTE RICARDO RAMOS, JR. , Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 07-03-06016-MCRAJA IN THE 365TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MAVERICK COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a

habitation and sentenced to nine years’ of community supervision. Applicant subsequently pleaded

true to a motion to revoke and was sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his

conviction. 

Applicant contends that his plea of “true” to the motion to revoke was involuntary because

it was predicated on the possibility of “shock probation,” and he was not brought back to Maverick
2

County while the trial court still had jurisdiction to consider “shock probation.” Counsel did not file

necessary motions to have applicant considered for “shock probation” while the trial court still had

jurisdiction under Section 6 of Article 42.12 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. We remanded this

application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Trial counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

determined that plea of true to motion to revoke was rendered involuntary by counsel’s

ineffectiveness. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Huerta, 692 S.W.2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App.

1985).

Reliefis granted. The judgment revoking communitysupervision in CauseNo. 07-03-06016-

MCRAJA in the 365 Judicial District Court of Maverick County is set aside, and Applicant is th

remanded to the custody of the sheriff of Maverick County to answer the allegations as set out in

State’s Application to Revoke Community Supervision.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: February 2, 2011

Do Not Publish
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0016 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. DONALD GARZA,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 25 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 20 2021

09/20/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0016
<TABLE> <S> <C>
             
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                1,097,245
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         5,392,078
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                           1,273,281
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      7,832,094
<PP&E>                                  933,050
<DEPRECIATION>                          223,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        8,550,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 1,019,472
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 11,670
<OTHER-SE>                            7,504,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          8,550,443
<SALES>                               4,827,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      5,254,578
<CGS>                                 1,964,954
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         1,964,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      2,135,721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        5,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       1,148,452
<INCOME-TAX>                            377,484
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     770,968
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            770,968
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0.066
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.055
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# Previous Announcement:

73 FR 3760, January 22, 2008.

# Previously Announced Date Of Meeting:

January 30, 2008.

# Status:

Open Meeting.

# Change In Meeting Time:

Change Start time to 8 a.m.

# Contact Person For More Information:

Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Wendy A. Hocking,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 08-357 Filed 1-23-08; 4:37 pm]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-M
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5949 

To exempt certain motor carriers engaged in agricultural business from the 

electronic logging device requirements, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2018 

Mr. PETERSON (for himself, Mr. GIANFORTE, and Mr. KING of Iowa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To exempt certain motor carriers engaged in agricultural 

business from the electronic logging device requirements, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agricultural Business 

5 Electronic Logging Device Exemption Act of 2018’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5949 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO THE ELECTRONIC LOGGING DEVICE 

2 REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN MOTOR CAR3 RIERS ENGAGED IN AGRICULTURAL BUSI4 NESS. 

5 Section 31137(b)(3) of title 49, United States Code, 

6 is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTION.— 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—An excepted motor 

9 carrier may comply with the hours of service re10 quirements by requiring each driver to use— 

11 ‘‘(i) a paper record of duty status 

12 form; or 

13 ‘‘(ii) an electronic logging device. 

14 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTED MOTOR CARRIER DE15 FINED.—In this paragraph, the term ‘excepted 

16 motor carrier’ means— 

17 ‘‘(i) a motor carrier when transporting 

18 a motor home or recreation vehicle trailer 

19 within the definition of the term 

20 ‘driveaway-towaway operation’ (as defined 

21 in section 390.5 of title 49, Code of Fed22 eral Regulations); 

23 ‘‘(ii) a motor carrier when— 

24 ‘‘(I) transporting an agricultural 

25 product (as defined in section 207 of 

26 the Agricultural Marketing Act of 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5949 IH

1 1946 (7 U.S.C. 1626)) from the 

2 source of such product; or 

3 ‘‘(II) returning empty to such 

4 source; and 

5 ‘‘(iii) a motor carrier when— 

6 ‘‘(I) transporting farm supplies 

7 for agricultural purposes (as defined 

8 in section 395.2 of title 49, Code of 

9 Federal Regulations) from the dis10 tribution point for such farm supplies; 

11 or 

12 ‘‘(II) returning empty to such 

13 distribution point.’’. 

14 SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT TO PRESCRIBE REGULATIONS. 

15 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

16 of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall promul17 gate such regulations as are necessary to carry out the 

18 amendment made by section 2 of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form
10-Q of EcoEmissions Solutions Inc. for the Quarter Ended August 31, 2010, I,
Larry Lorenz, President and Chief Executive Officer of EcoEmissions Solutions,
Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

|1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Period Ended
      August 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                    
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-Q for the Period Ended August 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      EcoEmissions Solutions Inc.

|By: | /s/ Larry Lorenz                            | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Larry Lorenz                                | 
|    | President and Chief Executive
      Officer | 

Dated: November 29, 2010

---
In the Senate of the United States, 

July 23, 2018. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 589) entitled ‘‘An Act to establish Department of 

Energy policy for science and energy research and development programs, and reform National Laboratory management and technology transfer programs, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

Strike title IV. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 589 

AMENDMENT
Enc. 

ADVISORY BOARD ON RADIATION AND WORKER HEALTH

4676 Columbia Parkway, MS: C-46 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45226

(513) 533-6825

CHAIRMAN:

Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D. 

 Lafayette, Indiana 

MEMBERS:

Josie Beach 

 Richland, Washington 

Bradley P. Clawson 

 Rexburg, Idaho 

Michael H. Gibson 

 Franklin, Ohio 

Mark A. Griffon 

 Salem, New Hampshire 

James E. Lockey, M.D. 

 Cincinnati, Ohio 

James M. Melius, M.D., Ph.D. 

 Albany, New York 

Wanda I. Munn 

 Richland, Washington 

John W. Poston, Sr., Ph.D. 

 College Station, Texas 

Robert W. Presley 

 Seymour, Tennessee 

Genevieve S. Roessler, Ph.D. 

 Elysian, Minnesota 

Phillip Schofield 

 Bosque Farm, New Mexico 

STAFF:

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY:

Theodore M. Katz, MPA 

 Atlanta, Georgia 

COMMITTEE MANAGEMENT :

Zaida Burgos 

 Atlanta, Georgia 

August 30, 2009 

The Honorable Louise M. Slaughter 

United States House of Representatives 

2469 Rayburn House Office Building 

Washington, DC 20515 

Dear Congresswoman Slaughter: 

This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of June 4, 2009 concerning the Special 

Exposure Cohort petition from the Bethlehem Steel Claimants Action Group. Copies of 

the letter have been distributed to all of the members of the Advisory Board on 

Radiation and Worker Health, and the letter was also read into the public record during 

the Board’s recent meeting on July 27, 2009 in Cincinnati, Ohio. 

You specifically requested that the Board consider having one of its upcoming meetings 

in Buffalo, New York so that members of the Claimants Action group would have an 

opportunity to interact with the Board and convey their concerns about the Energy 

Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act (EEOICPA). We 

appreciate the invitation to return to Buffalo for a meeting, and we will seriously 

consider it as a meeting site for one of our meetings in the year ahead. 

We are aware of the fact that many claimants have experienced frustration with regard 

to both the time that has been required to evaluate claims and petitions as well as the 

processes involved in evaluating and completing actions on claims. As you know, 

NIOSH and the Board have reviewed a number of issues relating to the Bethlehem Steel 

claims over the past few years. Also, during this time, a large number of the Bethlehem 

Steel claims have been processed. As of July 29, 2009, some 824 cases were sent to 

NIOSH by the Department of Labor for dose reconstruction and 795 of these cases have 

had dose reconstructions completed. We note that 382 (48 %) of the Bethlehem Steel 

claimants who have undergone dose reconstruction have been compensated through the 

EEOICPA program. 

The Board also approved sending copies of this letter to your colleagues who cosigned 

the letter of June 4. 

Thank you for your continued interest in the EEOICPA program and the activities of 

this Board. 

 Sincerely, 

 [Signature on file.] 

 Paul L. Ziemer, Ph.D. 

 Chairman, ABRWH
AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
 ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 
 This Amendment No. 1 to the Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of July 22, 2011, is entered into to be effective as of this 15th day of August 2012, by and among Pershing Gold Corporation f/k/aSagebrush Gold Ltd (“Pershing”), Continental Resources Acquisition Sub, Inc. (“Acquisition Sub”) and Continental Resources Group, Inc. (“Continental”).
 
 WHEREAS, Pershing, Continental and Acquisition Sub entered into the Agreement whereby Pershing and Acquisition Sub purchased substantially all of the assets of Continental in consideration for, among other things, shares of Pershing’s common stock (the “Pershing Shares”), which were subject to certain registration rights obligations by Pershing;
 
 WHEREAS, Pershing, Continental and Acquisition Sub have agreed to amend the Agreement to remove Section 8.4(a) (ii) of the Agreement which will have the effect of removing any liquidated damages associated with the registration of the Pershing Shares.
 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
 
 1.
Section 8.4(a)(ii) shall be removed in its entirety.
 
 2.
All other terms and provisions of the Agreement in direct conflict with the amendments specifically set forth herein are hereby amended to conform to these amendments; and except for these amendments, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain un-amended hereby and in full force and effect.
  3.
This Amendment, together with the Agreement, embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the Pershing, Acquisition Sub and Continental relating to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings relating to such subject matter.
  4.
If any provision of this Amendment, or the application of such provisions to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this Amendment, or the application of such provision to Persons or circumstances other than those to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby.
  5.
This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, and by the different parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when executed shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.  A facsimile transmission of this signed Amendment shall be legal and binding on all parties hereto.
 
 [Signature Page Follows]
 
 
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered on the date first written above.
  
 PERSHING GOLD CORPORATION
 
 /s/ Stephen Alfers________________________
 By: Stephen Alfers
 Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 CONTINENTAL RESOURCES ACQUISITION SUB, INC.
 
 /s/ John Stetson________________________
 By: John Stetson
 Title: Chief Executive Officer
 
 CONTINENTAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC.
 
 /s/ Joshua Bleak________________________
 By: Joshua Bleak
 Title: Chief Executive Officer