alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06

- 11

- 00 009

- CV

______________________________

IN RE :

JAMIE LEE BLEDSOE

Original Proceeding

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice M orriss2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jamie Lee Bledsoe has filed an or iginal petition seeking a writ of injunction from this

Court. He asks us to enjoin the Harrison County Court (Fine Collections) from collecting money

from his inmate trust fund based on a garnishment order entered in connection with his criminal

convictio n.

This C ourt has authority to issue a writ of mandamus, “and all other writs necessary to

enforce the jurisdiction of the court.” T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221(a) (Vernon 2004)

. We

have no statutory authority allowing us to issue a writ of injunction, and the matters raised by

Bledsoe in this petition do not implicate the jurisdiction of this Court in any respect.

We deny t he petition.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: January 2 6 , 2011

Date Decided: January 2 7 , 2011
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except under the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50570 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA, P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. P A U L J A S O N A L VA R E Z , a ls o k n o w n a s J a s o n A lv a r e z , D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e W est ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 7: 08- C R

- 219- 1 B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , C L E M E N T an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Pur s uantt o a pl e a ag r e e m e nt , Pau lJ as o n Al va r e z pl e ad e d g ui l t y t o o ne c ountof

c ons pi r i ng t o di st r ibut e a nd pos se ss w i t h t he i nt entt o di st r ibut e 5 0 gram s orm ore o f m et h am ph et am i n e. H e w as sentenced to 210 m on t h s of i m pr i s o nm e nta nd f

ive y e ar s o f

sup e r vi s e d r e l e as e . M o r e t han 40 da ys a f t e rt he en t ry of j u dg m en t , A l varez f

i l ed a n ot i ce of ap pea l an d a m ot i on f or an ext en si on of t i m e t o f

i l e an ap pea l . Th e di st ri ctcourtden i ed the m ot i on per F ED . R. A PP . P. 4 (b )(4). United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Janua ry 19, 2010 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk Case: 09-50570 Document: 00511007513 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/19/2010N o. 09- 50570

2 Co u n s e la p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n tA l v a r e z h a s fi l e d a mo t i o n t o wi t h d r a w. In his res pon se t o coun sel ’ s m ot i on , A l varez m oves f or t h e ap poi n t m en t of new c o u n s e l. T h i s court can di sm i ss an ap pea l du ri n g consi derati on of an i n t erl ocutory m oti on i f th e ap p ea l “i s frivo l ou s a n d en ti rely w i th ou t m erit. ” 5 T H C IR . R . 42. 2. Al va r e z di d no tf

i l e a no t i c e o f

a ppe alw i t hi n 1 0 da ys a f t e rt he e nt r y o f

t he c r im in a l ju d g m e n t. S eeF ED . R. A PP . P . 4 (b) ( 1) (A) (i) . H i s m ot i on foran ext en si on o f t i m e t o f

i l e a n a ppe alw as f

i l e d b e yo nd t he 3 0- da y t i m e l i m i tf o re xt e ndi ng t he ap pea lperi od u n der F ED . R. A PP . P . 4 (b) ( 4) . T h u s, t h e di st ri ctcourtdi d n oterr i n e nf o r c i ng t he t i m e l i m i t at i o ns s e tf o r t h i n F ED . R. A PP . P . 4(b) , an d thi s c ou rt m a yn o t r e v e r s e it s d e c is io n t o d o s o . Se eUni t e d St at e s v . Le i j ano - Cruz , 473 F. 3d 5 7 1 , 57 4 ( 5 th C i r. 2 0 0 6 ). B eca u se t h e i n stan t a p p ea l i s w i th ou t arg u a b l e m erit, t he a ppe ali s di s m i s s e d a s f r ivo l o us , c o uns e l ’ s m o t i o n t o w i t hdr aw i s g r ant e d, a n d A lv a r e z ’ s m o tio n fo rth e a p p o in tm e n t o f n e w co u n s e l is d e n ie d . S ee5 T H C IR . R . 42. 2. AP PE AL DI S M I S S ED; M OTI ONS GRANT ED I N PAR T AND DENI ED I N PART. Case: 09-50570 Document: 00511007513 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/19/2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 19, 2009 

1112 

Order 

 

November 19, 2009 

139206 

TERESA THEODORE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139206 

 COA: 285153 

Oakland CC: 2007-083096-NI 

RAYMOND HORENSTEIN, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., and HATHAWAY, J., would grant leave to appeal.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 42 (Monday, March 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.
    A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related to 
health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct on 
an as needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period of 
time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below will 
be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications for ``Consumer Assessment of Healthcare 
Providers and Systems (CAHPS)'' are to be reviewed and discussed at 
this meeting. These discussions are likely to reveal personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the applications. 
This information is exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-
cited statutes.

    SEP Meeting on: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and 
Systems (CAHPS).
    Date: March 20, 2007 (Open on March 20 from 9 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. 
and closed for the remainder of the meeting).
    Place: John M. Eisenberg Building, AHRQ Conference Center, 540 
Gaither Road, Rockville, Maryland 20850.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the non-confidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: February 20, 2007.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 07-979 Filed 3-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
ABRWH

Special Exposure Cohort Issues Work Group

Agenda

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537; Participant Code: 9933701

November 12, 2010; 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time

1. Welcome/ participants roll call

2. Review of Dow Madison Issues (SC&A)

3. Revised SC&A Dow Surrogate Data Report (SC&A)

4. Board questions and comments

5. Questions and comments from petitioners

6. Work Group Recommendations to Board 

7. Other issues
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000571

06-MAR-2018

12:34 PM
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A0 04 6 . DOUGLAS THOMPSON v

. THE STATE.

Fo l l owi n g a ju ry t ri al i n 2 0 1 1

, Do u g l as Th o m p s on was co n v i ct ed o f fo u r

co u nt s o f ag g rav at ed as s au l t, t h ree co u n t s o f fal s e im p ri so n m en t, an d o n e co u n t each

o f arm ed ro b b ery , b urg lary

, p o s s es s i o n o f m ari ju an a wi th i n t en t t o d i s t ri b u t e, an d

p o s s es s i o n o f a fi rearm d uri ng co m m i s s i o n o f a f

e l o n y

. W e affi rm ed Th o m p s o n ’ s

co n vi c t i o n s on d i rect ap p eal

. Cas e No

. A1 2 A2 0 0 0 (M ar. 7

, 2 01 3 ). In 2 0 1 9,

Th o m p s o n fi l ed a p ro s e “ m o t i o n t o v acat e/ d i s ch arg e al l o ffen s es ,” i n wh i ch h e rai s ed

n u m ero u s at t ack s t o t he v al i d it y o f h i s co n vi ct i o n s. Th e t ri al co u rt den i ed t h e m o t i o n,

an d Th o m

p s o n fi l ed t h i s ap p eal . Th e St at e h as fi l ed a m ot i o n t o d i s m i s s t h e ap p eal

,
arg u i n g t h at Th o m

p s on m ay n o t ap peal t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er. W e ag ree.

As t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as m ad e cl ear, a p os t -co n v i ct i o n m o t i o n s eek i n g to

v acat e o r s et as i d e an al l eg ed l y v o id cri m i n al co n v i ct i on i s n ot o ne o f t h e es t ab l i s h ed

p ro ced ures fo r ch al l en g i n g t h e v al i d i t y o f a ju d g m en t i n a c r i m i n a l c as e, an d an

ap p eal fro m t he tri al co urt ’ s ru l i n g o n s u ch a m o t io n s h o ul d b e d i s m is sed

. See Ro b er t s

v. S ta t e , 2 8 6 Ga. 5 3 2

, 53 2 (6 9 0 SE2 d 1 5 0 ) (2 0 1 0 ). Acco rd i n g l y , t h e St at e’ s m o t i o n

t o d i s m i s s i s h ereb y

GRANTED, an d Th o m

p s on ’ s ap p eal i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t if y t h a t th e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. August 26, 2020

08/26/2020
EXHIBIT
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of PRECISION PETROLEUM CORPORATION (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sharon
Farris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
February 19, 2010
 
 By:           /s/
Richard Porterfield
 Richard
Porterfield
 President,
Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1256 

CA 11-02245 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP TAYLOR, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

ANDREA W. EVANS, CHAIRWOMAN, NEW YORK STATE 

DIVISION OF PAROLE, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH RENE NOWOTARSKI

OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARLENE O. TUCZINSKI

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark

H. Dadd, A.J.), entered July 14, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR

article 78. The judgment denied the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs as moot (see Matter of Ansari v Travis, 9 AD3d 901, lv

denied 3 NY3d 610).

Entered: November 9, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ActiveCare, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), James Dalton, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer, and Michael G. Acton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
      James DaltonJames
      DaltonChairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive Officer/s/
      Michael G. ActonMichael
      G. ActonChief
      Financial Officer
 
 
 
 Dated:
August 11, 2009
 
 This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 32(a)

                                   TXU CORP.
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                              CERTIFICATION OF CEO




         The undersigned, C. John Wilder, President and Chief Executive
of TXU Corp. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

    1.   The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
         31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

    2.   Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
         respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
         Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 12th day of March, 2004.




                              /s/ C. John Wilder
                           --------------------------------------------------
                           Name:  C. John Wilder
                           Title: President and Chief Executive






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TXU Corp. and will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-31270 

Conference Calendar

 

WOODY VOINCHE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-1708

- - - - - - - - - -

June 18, 1997

Before SMITH, STEWART, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Woody Voinche appeals the district court’s dismissal of his

civil suit in which he challenged the adequacy of the CIA’s

response to his request made under the Freedom of Information Act

(FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552. The district court dismissed the suit

upon motion of the CIA, concluding that the FOIA requires the

exhaustion of administrative remedies prior to seeking judicial

review and that Voinche failed to meet the exhaustion requirement
No. 96-31270

- 2 -

when he failed to timely file an administrative appeal

challenging the adequacy of the CIA’s response to his request. 

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties

and find no reversible error. Voinche’s appeal is frivolous and

thus is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.; Howard v. King, 707

F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). We caution Voinche that future

frivolous appeals will invite the imposition of sanctions. To

avoid sanctions, Voinche should review any pending appeals to

ensure that they do not raise frivolous arguments.

 APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT

CORPORATION 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-207-SPM-GRJ

DAVID MORGAN et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________ /

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike. (Doc. 52.) Plaintiff

requests that the Court strike the letter motion filed by Defendant Bernard Ravelo (Doc.

46) because the motion fails to comply with the Local Rules and fails to raise a valid

grounds for dismissal. 

On April 25, 2011 Defendant Bernard Ravelo filed a letter advising the Court that

the letter should be considered as the Defendant’s answer to the Complaint. In the

letter Defendant denies all allegations in the complaint but concludes with the remark “I

ask that this case be dismissed.” Defendant does not offer any legal argument in

support of dismissal other than his objection to the unfairness of settlement demands

offered to him. As Plaintiff points out this comment is not a valid basis for dismissal.

Accordingly, Defendant’s Ravelo’s letter shall be deemed to be his answer to the

complaint but shall not be construed as a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is, therefore not

required to file any further response to the motion to dismiss. The clerk will be directed

to strike the notation on the docket that the letter is also a motion to dismiss. (Doc. 46.)

Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that:

Case 1:10-cv-00207-RS-GRJ Document 55 Filed 05/31/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike (Doc. 52) is GRANTED. 

2. The clerk is directed to terminate the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 47) as a

pending motion.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31 day of May, 2011. st

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-207-SPM-GRJ

Case 1:10-cv-00207-RS-GRJ Document 55 Filed 05/31/11 Page 2 of 2
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTI AL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PR ECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(D)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
The State, Respondent,

v. Demetrius Goodwin, Petitioner. Appellate Case No. 2013-001083

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Appeal from Richland County The Honorable W. Jeffrey You ng, Circuit Court Judge

Opinion No. 2015-MO-012 Heard February 18, 2015 – Filed March 18, 2015

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Appellate Defender La Nelle C. DuRant, of Columbia, for Petitioner. Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, and Assistant Attorney General Jennifer E. Roberts, both of Columbia, for Respondent.PER CURIAM: We granted certiorari to revi ew the court of appeals' decision in State v. Goodwin , Op. No. 2013-UP-110 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Mar. 13, 2013). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY , KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 2558]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-117]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


January 31, 2008 Board of Directors Meeting

    Time and Date: Thursday, January 31, 2008, 10 a.m. (Open Portion) 
10:15 a.m. (Closed Portion).
    Place: Offices of the Corporation, Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 
New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
    Status: Meeting Open to the Public from 10 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. 
Closed portion will commence at 10:15 a.m. (approx.).
    Matters To Be Considered:

1. President's Report.
2. Tribute--Ambassador Karan K. Bhatia.
3. Tribute--Ambassador Ned L. Siegel.
4. Tribute--Edith P. Quintrell.
5. Approval of September 20, 2007 Minutes (Open Portion).

    Further Matters To Be Considered: (Closed to the Public 10:15 a.m.)

1. Report from Audit Committee.
2. Report from Office of Chief Financial Officer.
3. Finance Project--Lebanon.
4. Finance Project--Global.
5. Finance Project--Mexico.
6. Finance Project--Nicaragua.
7. Finance Project--Sub-Saharan and North Africa.
8. Finance Project--Sub-Saharan Africa.
9. Finance Project--East Africa.
10. Finance Project--Africa.
11. Finance Project--Sub-Saharan Africa.
12. Finance Project--Middle East, North Africa.
13. Pending Major Projects.
14. Approval of September 20, 2007 Minutes (Closed Portion).

    Contact Person for Information: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438.

    Dated: January 11, 2008.
Connie M. Downs,
Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private Investment Corporation.
[FR Doc. 08-117 Filed 1-11-08; 1:17 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-M
**EXHIBIT 4.3.6**

**Amendment No. 6****To License No. 14708 (series A 014121)****dated April 7, 2000**

Legal address on the title page of the License shall read as follows:

“127083, Moscow, Ul. Vosmogo Marta, 10, bldg. 14.”

 

| **First Deputy Minister****of the Russian Federation for****Communications and Information** |   | [Signature] |   | Yu.A. Pavlenko |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------|--------|----------------|
|                                                                                         |   |        |   |           |
|                                                                                         |   |        |   | June 13, 2002  |

 

| **Head of the Department****of the Organization****of Licensing Activity** |   | [Signature][Seal] |   | B.V. Vorobiev |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|--------------------|
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5585 

To extend the authorization for the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 

Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2018 

Mr. KEATING introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization for the Cape Cod National 

Seashore Advisory Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE ADVISORY 

4 COMMISSION. 

5 Effective September 26, 2018, section 8(a) of Public 

6 Law 87–126 (16 U.S.C. 459b–7(a)) is amended in the sec7 ond sentence by striking ‘‘2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2028’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS