alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IB 

Union Calendar No. 576 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5684 

[Report No. 115–742, Part I] 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand eligibility for 

medication therapy management programs established under part D of 

the Medicare program to include certain individuals who are at risk 

for prescription drug abuse. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2018 

Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mrs. 

MCMORRIS RODGERS, and Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and 

Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

JUNE 12, 2018 

Additional sponsors: Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. WALDEN, Ms. HERRERA

BEUTLER, Mr. POSEY, and Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois 

JUNE 12, 2018 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JUNE 12, 2018 

The Committee on Ways and Means discharged; committed to the Committee 

of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5684 RH

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to expand 

eligibility for medication therapy management programs 

established under part D of the Medicare program to 

include certain individuals who are at risk for prescription drug abuse. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5684 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Seniors 

5 From Opioid Abuse Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANDING ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICATION THER7 APY MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS UNDER PART 

8 D. 

9 Section 1860D–4(c)(2)(A)(ii) of the Social Security 

10 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–104(c)(2)(A)(ii)) is amended— 

11 (1) by redesignating subclauses (I) through 

12 (III) as items (aa) through (cc), respectively, and 

13 adjusting the margins accordingly; 

14 (2) by striking ‘‘are part D eligible individuals 

15 who—’’ and inserting ‘‘are the following: 

16 ‘‘(I) Part D eligible individuals 

17 who—’’; and 

18 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub19 clause: 

20 ‘‘(II) Beginning January 1, 

21 2021, at-risk beneficiaries for pre22 scription drug abuse (as defined in 

23 paragraph (5)(C)).’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 576 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5684 

[Report No. 115–742, Part I] 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to 

who are at risk for prescription drug abuse. Medicare program to include certain individuals ment programs established under part D of the expand eligibility for medication therapy manageJUNE 12, 2018 

Reported from the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JUNE 12, 2018 

The Committee on Ways and Means discharged; comState of the Union and ordered to be printed mitted to the Committee of the Whole House on the 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED




PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE




SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reach Messaging Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shane Gau, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




Date: May 20, 2011
By:
/s/ Shane GauShane GauChief Executive Officer




A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
Agenda 

Teleconference Meeting of the Advisory Board's Work Group 

on the Use of Surrogate Data 

May 8, 2009 

1:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) 

Ted Katz – preliminaries 

NIOSH – update on Texas City SEC 

SC&A – update of their Texas City review 

Dan McKeel/petitioners – comments 

Discussion of key concerns and future activities.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-1663

___________

Paul Castonguay, Sr., *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Jack Taff; Cathy Taff, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: August 20, 2010

Filed: August 25, 2010

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Paul Castonguay appeals the district court’s1

 preservice dismissal without

prejudice of his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Upon careful de novo review, we

conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in abstaining under

Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), because Castonguay’s complaint sought

intervention in state-court adoption proceedings. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170,

1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (standard of review for dismissal); Norwood v.

1

The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska.
Dickey, 409 F.3d 901, 903 (8th Cir. 2005) (abstention holding reviewed for abuse of

discretion). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7113 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MARY ELLEN GRAVELY, Defendant - Appellant. No. 98-7131 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JETAUN O. GRAVELY, Defendant - Appellant.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-27-R, CA-98-348-R, CA-98-347-R) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 19992 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary Ellen Gravely, Jetaun O. Gravely, Appellants Pro Se. AnthonyPaul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellants seek to appeal the district court’s orders denying their motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp.1998). We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Gravely v. United States , Nos. CR-95-27-R; CA98-348-R; CA-98-347-R (W.D. Va. May 28, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
NO. 07-04-0583-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 16, 2005

______________________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLANT

V.

MARY FRANCIS APPIO, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 48,994-A; HONORABLE H. BRYAN POFF, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, The State of Texas, filed a Motion to Dismiss Appeal on February 9, 2005. 

Without passing on the merits of the case, appellant’s motion for voluntary dismissal is

granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Having dismissed the appeal

at appellant’s personal request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will

issue forthwith. 

Phil Johnson

 Chief Justice

Do not publish.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration 

# AGENCY:

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. 

# Time and Date:

April 10, 2008, 11 a.m. to 2 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time. 

# Place:

This meeting will take place telephonically. Any interested person may call Mr. Avelino Gutierrez at (505) 827-4565 to receive the toll free numbers and pass codes needed to participate in these meetings by telephone. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to that end, may consider matters properly before the Board. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565. 

Dated: March 12, 2008. 

William A. Quade, 

Associate Administrator for Enforcement and Program Delivery. 

[FR Doc. 08-1054 Filed 3-14-08; 2:25 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Richard E. Gathright                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|
| Richard E. Gathright                                         |
| Chief Executive Officer and President                        |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                                |
| September 28, 2011                                           |
|                                                         |
| /s/ Michael S. Shore                                         |
| Michael S. Shore                                             |
| Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Senior Vice President |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                                |
| September 28, 2011                                           |

----
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)








In connection with the annual report One eCommerce Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harry Nass, Principal Financial Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. Date: August 12, 2010/s/ Harry NassHarry NassPrincipal Financial Officer






A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
# C_2011025EN.01000101.xml

| 27.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 25/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 January 2011

2011/C 25/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3681 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4523 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86325 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8585 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2922 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8665 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,219 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7040 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8730 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2700 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1589 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3725 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3630 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6511 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7834 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7523 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 528,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7168 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0062 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4115 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 365,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1748 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,606 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,7000 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,146 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2821 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4896 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,5308 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3681

JPY

Japanese yen

112,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4523

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86325

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8585

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2922

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8665

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,219

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7040

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8730

RON

Romanian leu

4,2700

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1589

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3725

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3630

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6511

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7834

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7523

KRW

South Korean won

1 528,28

ZAR

South African rand

9,7168

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0062

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4115

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 365,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1748

PHP

Philippine peso

60,606

RUB

Russian rouble

40,7000

THB

Thai baht

42,146

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2821

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4896

INR

Indian rupee

62,5308

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The  undersigned, Jag Sandhu, President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Financial & Accounting Officer and a Director of Nava Resources, Inc. (the  “Company”), certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes  of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  of the Company for the Quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   April 19, 2011

By: /s/ Jag SandhuName:Jag SandhuTitle:  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer, PrincipalFinancial & Accounting Officer) 

A  signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the  Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

___________________

NO. 09-14-00431-CR

NO. 09-14-00432-CR

___________________

CALVIN JOSEPH PETE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. 13-18177, 14-20434

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 9, 2014, the trial court sentenced Calvin Pete on convictions 

for possession of a controlled substance. Pete filed a notice of appeal in each case

on September 25, 2014. The district clerk has provided the trial court’s 

certifications to the Court of Appeals. The trial court certified that these are pleabargain cases and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(a)(2).
2

On September 30, 2014, we notified the parties that we would dismiss the 

appeals unless the appellant established grounds for continuing the appeals. The 

appellant filed a response but failed to establish that the trial court’s certifications 

should be amended. Because the records do not contain certifications that show the 

defendant has the right of appeal, we must dismiss the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 

25.2(d). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals.

APPEALS DISMISSED.

______________________________

 LEANNE JOHNSON

 Justice

Submitted on October 28, 2014

Opinion Delivered October 29, 2014

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
<PAGE>   1


                            EXHIBIT 23

          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-37151) pertaining to the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan and the
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-25969) pertaining to the 1996 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan and the 1996 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan of Credit
Management Solutions, Inc. of our report dated January 23, 1998, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Credit Management Solutions, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.

                                                   /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Baltimore, Maryland
March 23, 1998
# EUR-Lex - - EN

*|*

#

**Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6189 — Imerys/Rio Tinto Talc Business) Text with EEA relevance **

*
Official Journal C 168 , 08/06/2011 P. 0015 - 0015 *

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.6189 — Imerys/Rio Tinto Talc Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 168/06

1. On 30 May 2011, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] by which the undertaking Imerys SA (France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the Talc Business of Rio Tinto Plc (United Kingdom) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Imerys: extraction and processing of industrial minerals,

- for Rio Tinto Talc Business: extraction, processing and marketing of talc.

3. On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4. The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6189 — Imerys/Rio Tinto Talc Business, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "EC Merger Regulation").

--------------------------------------------------
1

AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 102

Hilton Garden Inn Los Angeles/Redondo Beach, 2410 Marine Avenue, Redondo Beach, CA 90278

Phone: (310) 727-9999 Fax: (310) 727-9998

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537, Participant Code: 9933701#

LiveMeeting Link: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/cdc/join?id=

ZN5GQZ&role=attend&pw=ABRWH;

Meeting ID: ZN5GQZ Entry Code: ABRWH

Thursday, November 6, 2014

NOTE: All times in Pacific Time

8:15 a.m. – 8:30 a.m. Welcome and Introduction Dr. James Melius, Chair

8:30 a.m. – 8:50 a.m. NIOSH Program Update Mr. Stuart Hinnefeld, NIOSH 

8:50 a.m. – 9:10 a.m. DOL Program Update Mr. Frank Crawford, DOL

9:10 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. DOE Program Update Mr. Greg Lewis, DOE

9:30 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. Procedures Subcommittee 

Report on Completed Review 

of Program Evaluation Report 

14: “Construction Trades 

Workers”

Ms. Wanda Munn, Chair

10:15 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Break

10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Sufficient Accuracy/Coworker 

Dose Modeling

Dr. James Melius, SEC Issues 

Work Group (WG) Chair

Dr. James Neton, NIOSH

12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m. Lunch

1:30 p.m. – 1:45 p.m. SEC Petitions Status Update Mr. LaVon Rutherford, 

NIOSH

1:45 p.m. – 3:30 p.m. Board Work Session Dr. James Melius, Chair 
2

3:30 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Break

4:00 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. Santa Susana SEC

Petition/Site Profile Update

Mr. Phil Schofield, WG Chair

Dr. Lara Hughes, NIOSH

Mr. John Stiver, SC&A

4:30 p.m. – 5:30 p.m.* Public Comment

5:30 p.m. Adjourn

*Note: The public comment period may end before 5:30 p.m., following the last call for 

comments.