alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 9, 2006 

Order 

 

October 9, 2006 

132100 

TROY TOD TROSTLE, #234647 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 132100 

 CoA: 272141 

CRAIG R. AVERY, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

___________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for reconsideration of the order of 

September 9, 2006 is considered and it is DENIED because it does not appear the order 

was entered erroneously. Plaintiff-apppellant may pay the partial entry fee within 21 

days. Should he fail to pay, the Clerk is directed to close this file without further order of 

the Court.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

The Board ofDirectors

Access AnytimeBancorp, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements (No. 333-28217, No. 333-104906, and No. 333-28215) on Forms S-8 ofAccess Anytime Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary of our report dated February 11,2005, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition ofAccess Anytime Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form10-KSB of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc.

 

**KPMGLLP**

 

Albuquerque,New Mexico

March 1,2005

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             170
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        136
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,669
<PP&E>                                          13,742
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,572
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,412
<BONDS>                                          6,254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        134
<COMMON>                                         4,224
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,422
<SALES>                                         18,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,273
<CGS>                                           17,311
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,258
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (550)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     15
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (90)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                105
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       105
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32




</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 22, 2008)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 3849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-240]



[[Page 3847]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2008-6 of December 12, 2007--Suspension 
of Limitations Under the Jerusalem Embassy Act



Presidential Determination No. 2008-7 of December 14, 2007--Waiver of 
Reimbursement Under the U.N. Participation Act To Support UNAMID 
Efforts in Darfur


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 14 / Tuesday, January 22, 2008 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 3849]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2008-6 of December 12, 
                2007

                
Suspension of Limitations Under the Jerusalem 
                Embassy Act

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by 
                the Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 7(a) of the Jerusalem Embassy Act of 
                1995 (Public Law 104-45) (the ``Act''), I hereby 
                determine that it is necessary to protect the national 
                security interests of the United States to suspend for 
                a period of 6 months the limitations set forth in 
                sections 3(b) and 7(b) of the Act. My Administration 
                remains committed to beginning the process of moving 
                our Embassy to Jerusalem.

                You are hereby authorized and directed to transmit this 
                determination to the Congress, accompanied by a report 
                in accordance with section 7(a) of the Act, and to 
                publish the determination in the Federal Register.

                This suspension shall take effect after transmission of 
                this determination and report to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, December 12, 2007.

[FR Doc. 08-240
Filed 1-18-08; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00133

- CR

ELLEN YOUNG APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 2 OF DENTO N COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CR

- 2013

- 08214

- B

------------



### MEMORANDUM O PINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered “ Applican t ’ s Motion t o Withdraw Appeal ” filed by

Appellant. The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate

procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). No decision of this court having been

1 Se e Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

del ivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

/s/ Sue Walker

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: August 13 , 2015
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5693 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to enter into contracts and agreements for the placement of 

veterans in non-Department medical foster homes for certain veterans 

who are unable to live independently. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2018 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to enter into contracts 

and agreements for the placement of veterans in nonDepartment medical foster homes for certain veterans 

who are unable to live independently. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Long-Term Care Vet5 erans Choice Act’’. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5693 IH

1 SEC. 2. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS CONTRACT AU2 THORITY FOR PLACEMENT OF VETERANS IN 

3 NON-DEPARTMENT MEDICAL FOSTER HOMES. 

4 (a) AUTHORITY.—Section 1720 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new subsection: 

7 ‘‘(h)(1) During the three-year period beginning on 

8 October 1, 2019, and subject to paragraph (2), at the re9 quest of a veteran for whom the Secretary is required to 

10 provide nursing home care under section 1710A of this 

11 title, the Secretary may place the veteran in a medical fos12 ter home that meets Department standards, at the ex13 pense of the United States, pursuant to a contract or 

14 agreement entered into between the Secretary and the 

15 medical foster home for such purpose. A veteran who is 

16 placed in a medical foster home under this subsection shall 

17 agree, as a condition of such placement, to accept home 

18 health services furnished by the Secretary under section 

19 1717 of this title. 

20 ‘‘(2) Not more than 900 veterans placed in a medical 

21 foster home, whether placed before or after the date of 

22 the enactment of this subsection, may have their care cov23 ered at the expense of the United States under subsection 

24 (a). 

25 ‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘medical foster 

26 home’ means a home designed to provide non-institutional, 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5693 IH

1 long-term, supportive care for veterans who are unable to 

2 live independently and prefer a family setting.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (h) of title 38, 

4 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take 

5 effect on October 1, 2019. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.0

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

3692116 Canada Inc.
Incorporated in Canada

Audio Visual Systems, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Ohio

Central Audio Visual, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Florida

C & G Marketing, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Alabama

Compass Consumables Inc.
Incorporated in Canada

Compass Export Marketing (Overseas) Limited
Incorporated in the British Virgin Islands (Inactive)

Computer Showcase, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Georgia

Consolidated Media Systems, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Tennessee

Digital Networks, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Maryland

Diversified Data Products, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Michigan

Diversified Data Products (U.K.) Limited
Incorporated in England

Dreher Business Products, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Ohio

Duo-Communications of Canada Ltd.
Incorporated in Canada

Electronic Image Systems, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Washington

Fairview - AFX, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Oklahoma


<PAGE>

Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Page 2


MCSi-California, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Maryland

MCSi  Canada Inc.
Incorporated in the province of Ontario, Canada

MCSi Purchasing L.L.C.
a Maryland limited liability company

MCSi-Texas, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Texas

Midwest Visual Equipment Co., Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Illinois

Technical Industries, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Georgia

Video Images, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Wisconsin

Westek Presentation Systems, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of California

Zengine, Inc.
Incorporated in the state of Delaware
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 8 Filed 03/07/11 Page 1 of 4
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 8 Filed 03/07/11 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 8 Filed 03/07/11 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 8 Filed 03/07/11 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-60177

Summary Calendar

SHERMAN OBY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

OFFICER COREY SANDER,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:14-CV-45

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sherman Oby, Mississippi prisoner #45397, appeals the damages 

awarded by the district court following the entry of a default judgment against 

Officer Corey Sanders in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceeding. After Oby testified 

at a hearing, the district court awarded him $100 in nominal damages, but it 

declined to award either compensatory or punitive damages.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 1, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-60177 Document: 00515140329 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/01/2019
No. 17-60177

2

Oby first argues that the district court erred in declining to award 

compensatory damages. He argues that, if he failed to provide sufficient 

evidence for such damages, he should have been allowed to supplement or 

amend his complaint. However, the record establishes that Oby received 

multiple opportunities to set forth his claims and evidence in the district court. 

Next, Oby correctly argues that compensatory damages may be awarded for 

more than out-of-pocket expenses, including for impairment of reputation, 

humiliation, or mental anguish. See, e.g., Memphis Cmty. Sch. Dist. v. 

Stachura, 477 U.S. 299, 307 (1986). However, Oby did not assert a claim for 

damages on these grounds in the district court.

The primary issue Oby raises is the district court’s conclusion that 

punitive damages were not warranted. “Punitive damages may be awarded in 

§ 1983 cases ‘when the defendant’s conduct is shown to be motivated by evil 

motive or intent, or when it involves reckless or callous indifference to the 

federally protected rights of others.’” Heaney v. Roberts, 846 F.3d 795, 803 (5th 

Cir. 2017) (quoting Smith v. Wade, 461 U.S. 30, 56 (1983)). We review a district 

court’s determination on punitive damages deferentially; reversal of the 

district court’s decision is not required even where a party has made a showing 

justifying punitive damages. Heaney, 846 F.3d at 803. Even if the district 

court’s conclusion that Officer Sanders used constitutionally excessive force 

equates to a threshold finding of evil intent or callous indifference, see Smith,

461 U.S. at 53-54 & n.17, the court did no abuse its discretion by ultimately 

concluding that punitive damages were unwarranted in this case, see Heaney, 

846 F.3d at 803.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-60177 Document: 00515140329 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/01/2019
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Profile LV, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer of Ceres Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




























By:
/s/  Jennifer MagroName:
Jennifer MagroTitle:
Chief Financial Officer ofCeres Managed Futures LLC,General Partner of the registrantDate:
May 16, 2011
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grant Hartford Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we, Eric Sauve, President/Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and
David Gilmer, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 20, 2010



/s/Eric SauveEric SauvePresident/Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Office

Dated: August 20, 2010



/s/David GilmerDavid GilmerSecretary/Treasurer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2006-25942; Airspace Docket No. 06-ACE-12]

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

This document confirms the effective date of the direct final rule which revises Class E airspace at Thedford, NE.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         0901 UTC, May 10, 2007.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Grant Nichols, System Support, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106;                         *telephone:*                         (816) 329-2522.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FAA published this direct final rule with a request for comments in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 11, 2007 (72 FR 1278). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the regulation would become effective on May 10, 2007. No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.                

      ( print page 9239)    
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on February 16, 2007.

Walter Tweedy,

Manager, System Support Group, ATO Central Service Area.

[FR Doc. 07-903  Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

AYOKUNIE O. KWANZOA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv85-RH/WCS

DR. ANTHONY McCOY,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 16. The plaintiff moved for reconsideration, ECF No.

17. The magistrate judge denied the motion for reconsideration, see ECF No. 18,

but I treat the motion as also constituting objections to the report and

recommendation. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. 

Some of the plaintiff’s allegations are fanciful and removed from reality. 

Others are unsupported by factual allegations. The plaintiff has alleged no facts

supporting any claim against this defendant. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

Case 4:11-cv-00085-RH-WCS Document 20 Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is dismissed with

prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on July 18, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case No: 4:11cv85-RH/WCS

Case 4:11-cv-00085-RH-WCS Document 20 Filed 07/19/11 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of C. Richard Lyttle and B. Nicholas Harvey hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), respectively of Radius Health, Inc. (the “Company”), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   September 30, 2011 | By:        |
|---------------------------------|------------|
|                            | ** ** | /s/ C. Richard Lyttle |
|                            |       | **C. Richard Lyttle** |
|                            |       | ***President and Chief Executive   Officer*** |
|                            |       |
|                            |       |
| Date:   September 30, 2011 | By:        |
|                            | ** ** | /s/ B. Nicholas Harvey |
|                            |       | **B. Nicholas Harvey** |
|                            |       | ***Chief Financial Officer*** |

 

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report, and “accompanies” such Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report to which it relates), notwithstanding any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----