alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2



Certification Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Kenneth Eade, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Independent Film Development Corporation;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:  September 23, 2009



/s/  Kenenth G. Eade

Kenneth G. Eade

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Man Shing Agricultural
Holdings, Inc, (the "Company") for the three and six months ended December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Eddie Cheung, Chief Executive Officer, of the Company,
certify that:
  
 *   the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 *   information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, our
consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
 
 
 /s/ Eddie
Cheung
 Eddie
Cheung
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 Date:
February 11, 2010
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by us for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2010023EN.01000201.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 January 2010

2010/C 23/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3966 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4443 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86655 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2388 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4662 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2120 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,223 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,15 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7087 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0463 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1055 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0793 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5639 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4924 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8470 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9771 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9609 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 622,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5704 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5343 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3150 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 071,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7638 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,922 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,3400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,332 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6006 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1907 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,5160 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3966

JPY

Japanese yen

126,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4443

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86655

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2388

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4662

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2120

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,223

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,15

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7087

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0463

RON

Romanian leu

4,1055

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0793

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5639

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4924

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8470

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9771

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9609

KRW

South Korean won

1 622,00

ZAR

South African rand

10,5704

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5343

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3150

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 071,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7638

PHP

Philippine peso

64,922

RUB

Russian rouble

42,3400

THB

Thai baht

46,332

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6006

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1907

INR

Indian rupee

64,5160

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Dismissed; Opinion Filed April 9, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00203-CV

HARRISON LEWIS, Appellant

V.

TROIX CRAIG WATKINS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-00345-2019

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Nowell

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard 

dated February 15, 2019, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant 

to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would 

result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated February 15, 2019, we informed appellant 

the docketing statement in this case was due. We cautioned appellant that failure to file the 

docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further 

notice. By letter dated February 25, 2019, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been 

filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide 

verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or to provide written 

documentation appellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs within ten 
–2–

days. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal 

without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, provided the required 

documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

190203F.P05

/Erin A. Nowell/

ERIN A. NOWELL

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

HARRISON LEWIS, Appellant

No. 05-19-00203-CV V.

TROIX CRAIG WATKINS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District 

Court, Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-00345-2019.

Opinion delivered by Justice Nowell. 

Justices Bridges and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee TROIX CRAIG WATKINS recover his costs of this 

appeal from appellant HARRISON LEWIS.

Judgment entered this 9th day of April, 2019.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [AA-11157; AK-964-1410-KC-P]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of decision approving lands for conveyance. 

# SUMMARY:

As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an appealable decision approving the surface estate in certain lands for conveyance pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act will be issued to Tanalian, Incorporated. The lands are in the vicinity of Port Alsworth, Alaska, and located in:

U.S. Survey No. 12170, Alaska.

Containing 159.96 acres.

## Seward Meridian, Alaska

T. 1 N., R. 29 W.,

Sec. 19.

Containing approximately 39 acres.

Aggregating approximately 199 acres.

Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the Anchorage Daily News.

# DATES:

The time limits for filing an appeal are:

                        1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by                               ( print page 3263)                            the decision shall have until February 19, 2008 to file an appeal.                    

2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal.

Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights.

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7504.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Bureau of Land Management by phone at 907-271-5960, or by e-mail at                         *ak.blm.conveyance@ak.blm.gov*. Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to contact the Bureau of Land Management.                    

John Leaf,

Land Law Examiner, Branch of Land Transfer Adjudication I.

[FR Doc. 08-150 Filed 1-16-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-M
*This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. §

46(d).

 

** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20317

Conference Calendar

 

TIMOTHY AGUILAR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ALICE MASON ABBOTT; DAVID TURNER,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CV-1654

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

Timothy Aguilar, a Texas prisoner (# 647166), appeals from

the dismissal of his pro se civil rights action as frivolous

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). The district court

sua sponte dismissed the complaint because it was barred by the

applicable two-year Texas statute of limitations. A district court may

sua sponte dismiss a complaint as frivolous on statute-of-limitations grounds where “it is clear
No. 98-20317

-2-

from the face of a 

complaint that the claims asserted are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.” Moore v.

McDonald, 30 F.3d 616, 620 (5th Cir. 1994). For § 1983 claims, federal courts

apply the general personal injury statute of limitations of the

forum state, Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50 (1989), which

is two years in Texas. Cooper v. Brookshire, 70 F.3d 377, 380

n.20 (5th Cir. 1995); see TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §

16.003(a) (West). 

Aguilar’s assertions that his claims were not discoverable until

June 1995 are meritless, because his own allegations reflected

that in 1993 he was aware of the injury he alleges and of

circumstances that would have led a reasonable person to

investigate further at that time. See Piotrowski v. City of

Houston, 51 F.3d 512, 516 (5th Cir. 1995). The district court

did not abuse its discretion in applying the limitations

provision.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of Green EnviroTech Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 9, 2010/s/ Wayne Leggett


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)
----**---.--------~:--·--------**
DISMISS; Opinion Filed January 16, 2013.

In The 

## Qiourt ofAppeals llift}f 

## ili.strid of Wexa.s at ilalla.s No. 05-11-01339-CV IN THE INTEREST OFJ.B.T., M.H.T., AND P.L.T., CillLDREN On Appeal from the I99th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. l99-5469S:.07 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Lang Before the Court is thejointmotion to dismiss the appeal filed by the parties. The parties have reached a settlement and request the appeal be dismissed. We GRANTthe motion. Pursuant to the agreement ofthe parties, we DISMISS the appeal. Costs are taxed against appellant Joseph B. Taylor. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a), (d). We DIRECT the Clerk to issue the-mandate forthwith.

PER CURIAM

lll339F.P05

## Qiourt of 1\.pp.eal.s lf.ift}! ji)i.strict of w.exa.s at ji)alla.s JUDGMENT IN THE INTEREST OF J.B.T., M.H.T., AND P.L.T., CHILDREN No. 05-11-01339-CV Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court ofCollin County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 199-54695-07). Opinion delivered byJustice Moseley, Justices Francis and Lang participating. In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. It is ORDERED that appellee Monica M. Taylorrecoverhercosts ofthis appeal from appellantJoseph B. Taylor. .Judgment**enter~d** January 16, 2013.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Realbiz Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Adam Friedman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Adam FriedmanAdam FriedmanChief Financial OfficerSeptember 23, 2013
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSEPH L. STRICKLAND,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv310/RS/EMT

PAIGE AUGUSTINE, Warden,

FCI MARIANNA,

Respondent.

______________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s third amended petition for writ of habeas

corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Docs. 12). The proper respondent in a habeas case is

generally the petitioner's “immediate custodian,” that is, the warden of the facility in which the

petitioner is incarcerated at the time he files the habeas petition. Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426,

439 (2004). Therefore, Warden Paige Augustine shall be substituted as the proper Respondent in

this action and shall be required to respond to the amended petition.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk of court is directed to amend the docket to reflect that Paige Augustine,

Warden at FCI Marianna, in the proper Respondent in this action. 

2. The clerk shall furnish a copy of the third amended petition (Doc. 12) to Respondent

and to the United States Attorney for this District. 

3. Respondent shall have SIXTY (60) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order

to show cause, if any, why the requested relief should not be granted.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of April 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ JEFFREY S. CARBIENERJeffrey S. CarbienerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.8


 





Catherine B Hall: Offer Agreement


 


		·	Position: Chief Marketing Officer



		·	Reports to: Chief Executive Officer



		·	Base Salary : $195,000 to be reviewed on first fiscal anniversary following the IPO in conjunction with normal pay
                                                                                                                      practices and reviews. ( on or about January 2015)



		·	Bonus : 40% of base salary based on measurable objectives –prorated for first year (x/12 eg., in FY 2014 8/12 of
                                                                                                               40% = 26.6% ) paid at end of fiscal year in accordance with normal pay practices.



		·	Stock Options : 40,000 pre IPO incentive stock options at a $2.10 strike price subject to board approval and terms and conditions
of the company stock option plan. Includes acceleration of vesting if terminated without “cause” or resign for “good
reason”, or change of control.



		·	Benefits in event employment if terminated other than for cause subject to company policy as follows :









		°	2 weeks severance for each year of service prorated on a straight line basis consistent with company policy.





		·	4 weeks vacation, annually after 8 months of service.



		·	Paid health care



		·	Start date 4/28/2014



 


	Agreed	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ John B. Richards	5/1/2014	 	/s/ Catherine B. Hall	4/24/14
	John B. Richards (date)	 	Catherine B. Hall (date)
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 562 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to flatline the individual 

mandate penalty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2017 

Mr. MESSER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to flatline 

the individual mandate penalty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Obamacare Regressive 

5 Tax Relief Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FLATLINING THE INDIVIDUAL MANDATE PENALTY. 

7 (a) PERCENTAGE OF INCOME.—Section 

8 5000A(c)(2)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

9 amended to read as follows: 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 562 IH

1 ‘‘(B) PERCENTAGE OF INCOME.—An 

2 amount equal to 1 percent of the excess of the 

3 taxpayer’s household income for the taxable 

4 year over the amount of gross income specified 

5 in section 6012(a)(1) with respect to the tax6 payer for the taxable year.’’. 

7 (b) APPLICABLE DOLLAR AMOUNT.—Section 

8 5000A(c)(3) of such Code is amended— 

9 (1) by striking subparagraphs (B) and (D), 

10 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as sub11 paragraph (B), and 

12 (3) by amending subparagraph (A) to read as 

13 follows: 

14 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

15 subparagraph (B), the applicable dollar amount 

16 is $95.’’. 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after the 

19 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS