alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of XTL Biopharmaceuticals
Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, David Grossman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Ronen Twito, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | /s/ David Grossman     
| | -----------------------
| | David Grossman         
| | Chief Executive Officer
| |                        
| | /s/ Ronen Twito        
| | Ronen Twito            
| | Chief Financial Officer
| |                        



Date: April 25, 2013
Exhibit 3.4

                             Name Change Amendment

DEAN HELLER
Secretary of State
204 North Carson Street, Suite 1
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4299
(775) 684-5708
Website: secretaryofstate.biz

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                      (PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 AND 78.390)

         Important: Read attached instructions before completing form.

                      ABOVE SPACE IS FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

             Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
                        For Nevada Profit Corporations
         (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)

1. Name of corporation:   Nasus Consulting, Inc.

2. The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if
available):

Article 1 of the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation is hereby
amended to change the name of the corporation from Nasus Consulting, Inc. to
National Asset Recovery Corp.

3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
greater proportion of the voting power as maybe required in the case of a vote
by classes or series, or as maybe required by the provisions of the articles
of incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 70.04%

4. Effective date of filing (optional):  10/01/10

5. Officer Signature (required):	/s/ William G. Forhan, Chief Executive
 						Officer and Chief Financial Officer

*If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference of any
relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares,
then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the
affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a
majority of the voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment
required regardless of limitations or restrictions on the voting power
thereof.

IMPORTANT:  Failure to include any of the above information and submit the
proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.

              This form must be accompanied by appropriate fees.
                          See attached fee schedule.

Nevada Secretary of State AM 78.385 Amend 2003
Revised on 11/03/03

<page>
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wollemi Mining Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher
Coldicutt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of May, 2008.


/s/ Christopher Coldicutt
--------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Donald W. Morgan, certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Larscom
Incorporated;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:

                  a)       Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

                  b)       Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c)       Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

         5.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

                  a)       All significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

                  b)       Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2004

By:  /s/ Donald W. Morgan
     ---------------------
Chief Financial Officer
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Rocky Flats Work Group 

Teleconference: February 9, 2017 

10:30a.m. Eastern Time

Conference Phone: 1-866-659-0537; Participant Code: 9933701#

Welcome and roll call

1. DCAS/SC&A – Discussion of SEC192 Rocky Flats CML White Paper (issued 

12/13/16) and of SC&A’s Review (issued 1/24/17), followed by the Working 

Group’s Decision on Closing the issue

2. DCAS – Brief overview of the status of SEC Petition 192 Rocky Flats Plant 

3. Discussion by Working Group members of the five issues mandated for 

investigation at RF by the Board (10/17/13) for the time period after 12/31/83

4. Petitioner comments

5. Further WG discussion as needed of any other issues related to the SEC Petition 

192

6. Working Group decision on path forward and/or recommendations on SEC 

Petition 192 for the March ABRWH meeting.

Adjourn
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5658 

To amend the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to clarify the definition of 

competitive integrated employment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2018 

Mr. GROTHMAN (for himself, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. ESTES of Kansas, and Mr. 

KING of Iowa) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 to clarify the 

definition of competitive integrated employment. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Workplace Choice and 

5 Flexibility for Individuals with Disabilities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF DEFINITION OF COMPETITIVE 

7 INTEGRATED EMPLOYMENT. 

8 Section 7(5) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 

9 U.S.C. 705) is amended— 

10 (1) in subparagraph (B)— 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5658 IH

1 (A) by striking ‘‘not including’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘including social and interpersonal inter3 actions with colleagues, vendors, customers, su4 periors, or other such persons who the employee 

5 may come into contact with during the work 

6 day and across workplace settings, other than’’; 

7 (B) by inserting before the semicolon at 

8 the end the following: ‘‘, except that such inter9 actions shall not be considered solely at the 

10 work unit level’’; and 

11 (C) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

12 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub13 paragraph (C) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(D) for which an individual may have 

16 been hired through— 

17 ‘‘(i) contracts and subcontracts 

18 awarded pursuant to chapter 85 of title 

19 41, United States Code; 

20 ‘‘(ii) State set-aside contracts in21 tended to support employment for individ22 uals with disabilities; or 

23 ‘‘(iii) other contracts subject to man24 dated direct labor-hour ratio of persons 

25 with disabilities.’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5658 IH

1 SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

2 Nothing in the amendments made by this Act shall 

3 be construed to reduce the number of jobs available for 

4 referral by a State agency or other entity. 

5 SEC. 4. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

6 It is the sense of Congress that individuals who are 

7 hired pursuant to community rehabilitation programs, 

8 chapter 85 of title 41, United States Code, State set-aside 

9 contracts, or mandated direct-labor hour ratio programs, 

10 should be considered— 

11 (1) part of the competitive labor market; and 

12 (2) an employment outcome for State vocational 

13 rehabilitation purposes. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Work Group on Worker Outreach

Cincinnati Airport Marriott 

2395 Progress Dr. 

Hebron, KY 41048 

859-586-0166 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

December 2, 2009

9:30 a.m. ― 9:45 a.m. Welcome and Introductions 

9:45 a.m.― 10:45 a.m. Implementation Plan Discussion and Approval 

10:45 a.m. ―12:00 p.m. Documentation and Tracking of Advisory Board Public Comments 

12:00 p.m. ―1:00 p.m. Lunch 

1:00 p.m. ―2:00 p.m. Workers, Worker Representatives/Advocate Comments* 

2:00 p.m. ―3:00 p.m. Protocol for Authorization and Attendance at Worker Outreach 

Meetings 

 

3:00 p.m. ―3:30 p.m. Action Items and Assignments 

3:30 p.m. Adjourn
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 18-2285

___________________________ Michael Paul Shelton lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v. McLeod County; McLeod County Jail; Sher iff Scott Rehmann, in his official capacity as Sheriff of McLeod County; J ohn Doe; Jane Doe, #1; Jane Doe, #2; Various Unknown Corrections Officers, Do ctors, and Nurses, assigned to the McLeod County Jail lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis

____________ Submitted: May 7, 2019 Filed: May 10, 2019 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Michael Shelton appeals after the district court 1 adversely granted summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint claiming that jail officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal , we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper. See Odom v. Kaizer , 864 F.3d 920, 921 (8th Cir. 2017) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo); see also Saylor v. Nebraska , 812 F.3d 637, 644 (8th Cir. 2016) (discussing medical deliberate-indifference standard; the plaintiff must prove, inter alia, that the defendants actually knew of but deliberately disregarded his serious medical need); Meuir v. Greene Cty. Jail Emps. , 487 F.3d 1115, 1118–19 (8th Cir. 2007) (i nmates have no constitutional right to receive a particular or requested course of treatment , and prison doctors remain free to exercise their independent medical judgment). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       
<S>                           <C>

<ARTICLE>                     6
<SERIES>
     <NUMBER>                 003
     <NAME>
                              Federated Municipal Securities
                              Fund, Inc.
                              C Shares
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Mar-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  Mar-31-1998
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>         694,344,458
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>        724,749,481
<RECEIVABLES>                 13,226,554
<ASSETS-OTHER>                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                737,976,035
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>      39,478,519
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>     2,267,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>           41,745,959
<SENIOR-EQUITY>               0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>      672,001,933
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>         1,615,215
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>         1,993,037
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>     0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>        (3,851,364)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>       (2,325,516)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>      0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>      30,405,023
<NET-ASSETS>                  17,615,691
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>             0
<INTEREST-INCOME>             39,150,357
<OTHER-INCOME>                0
<EXPENSES-NET>                7,004,385
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>       32,145,972
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>      (664,845)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>     42,415,663
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>         73,896,790
<EQUALIZATION>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>     712,253
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>      39,946
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>         12,628
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>       176,581
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>   598,603
<SHARES-REINVESTED>           44,200
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>        2,635,228
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>       0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>     (34,795)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>       (3,325,545)
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>    0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>         3,872,458
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>               7,845,975
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>          702,466,607
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>         10.310
<PER-SHARE-NII>               0.370
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>       0.650
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>          0.370
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>     0.030
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>          0.020
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>           10.910
<EXPENSE-RATIO>               1.74
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>        0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>          0.000
        



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 16, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2976-2977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-142]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Committee Management; Notice of Renewal

    The Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) 
has determined that the renewal of the National Small Business 
Development Center Advisory Board is necessary and in the public 
interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the 
Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration by 15 U.S.C. 633. 
This determination follows consultation with the Management 
Secretariat, General Services Administration.
    Name of Committee: National Small Business Development Center 
Advisory Board.
    Purpose and Objective: The goals and objectives of the Board are to 
advise, counsel, and confer with the Associate Administrator, Office of 
Small Business Development Centers (SBDCs) in carrying out her/his 
duties. The scope of the Board's activities covers the entire SBDC 
program.
    Balanced Membership Plans: The board consists of nine members. 
Every effort is made to select board members who are known to be 
familiar and sympathetic with small business needs and problems.
    Duration: Continuing.
    Responsible SBA Officials: Wilma Goldstein, Acting Associate

[[Page 2977]]

Administrator, Office of Small Business Development Centers, U.S. Small 
Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Meredith Davis,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 08-142 Filed 1-15-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
Exhibit 10.23

 

RETENTION PAYMENT AND SEPARATION BENEFITS

ATTACHMENT

 

a.              Retention Payment. Oxy will pay you an amount equal to 2 times your then yearly base salary in one lump sum cash payment at the date that is one year after the new CEO commences employment.

 

b.              Separation Benefits. If, prior to December 31, 2014, Oxy terminates you without cause, then, subject to your timely execution of waivers and releases of the type required by Oxy’s Notice and Severance Pay Plan, you will receive in addition to your Retention Payment, at your separation date or the time otherwise provided below:

 

	
1.
    	
Separation   pay at your then current base salary for 24 months;
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
2.
    	
Your   target annual bonus amount for the year of separation; and
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
3.
    	
The same medical and other benefits (other than Notice and Severance   Pay) as are received by employees terminated pursuant to Oxy’s Notice and   Severance Pay Plan.
    


 

Payments of your separation pay under Paragraph b.1 shall be made monthly beginning the month after separation; provided, however, that to the extent required by Section 409A of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder (“Section 409A”), the payment of certain amounts will be delayed until the seventh month that begins after your separation date. Payment under Paragraph b.2 will be made as soon as practicable after the date you become entitled to the payment under this provision or at the time provided for in any underlying compensation arrangement or plan if required for compliance with Section 409A. Although not guaranteed by the Company, payments under this attachment are intended to be exempt or compliant with Section 409A, and the attachment will be interpreted accordingly. Payments under this attachment will be subject to all applicable tax and tax-related items withholding requirements. In addition, the separation payments to be paid pursuant to this attachment will not exceed the amount permitted under Oxy’s Golden Parachute Policy unless such separation payments are approved by a vote of Oxy’s stockholders.

 

c.               Other Benefits. The foregoing is not intended to be a comprehensive listing of the benefits to which you may be entitled at the time of your separation, including your rights under any outstanding incentive awards. In addition, the Executive Compensation and Human Resources Committee may, in its sole discretion, decide to provide additional separation benefits.
## NO. 12

- 09

- 00326

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

AARON RAY WILLIAMS, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Aaron Williams appeals his conviction of burglary of a habitation. In his sole issue,

Appellant argues that the trial court’s judgment should be reformed to accurately reflect the

proceedings below. We modify the judgment and affirm as modified.

B ACKGROUND

Appellant was charged by indictment with burglary of a habitation und er Texas Penal

Code section 30.02 , a second degree felony. Appellant pleaded guilty to the charged offense.

The trial court subsequently found Appellant guilty of the charged offense. The trial court’s

written judgment reflects that Appellant pleaded “true” to an enhancement and that the court

found the enhancement to be “true.” The trial court assessed Appellant’s punishment at twenty

ye ars of imprisonment. This appeal followed.

J UDGMENT

In his sole issue, Appellant asks that we reform the trial court’s judgment to accurately

reflect the proceedings at trial. The State has joined Appellant in this request.The written judgment in the case at bar reflects that Appellant entered a plea of “true” to

an alleged enhancement paragraph and that the trial court found that allegation to be “true.”

However, the indictment on which this case is based does not contain an enhancement paragraph.

M oreover, Appellant was not asked to enter a plea to any enhancement paragraph in this case.

Finally, when pronouncing Appellant’s sentence, the trial court neither made a n enhancement

finding nor mention ed the existence of an enhancement paragraph

.

As a general rule, when an oral pronouncement of sentence and a written judgment differ,

t he oral pronouncement controls. Ex parte Madding , 70 S.W.3d 131 , 135 (Tex. Crim. App.

2002)

. Further, when it has the necessary information before it, an appellate court may correct a

trial court’s written judgment to reflect its oral pronouncement. Thompson v. State , 108 S.W.3d

287 , 290 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) ; Ingram v. State , 261 S.W.3d 749, 754 (Tex. App.

– Tyler 2008,

no pet.)

. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure expressly authorize us to modify the judgment

of the trial court. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.2.

Under the circumstances presented in this case , the record is clear that the written

reference to a plea and finding of “true” o n an enhancement to Appellant’s burglary of a

habitation convict ion is erroneous. Therefore, we sustain Appellant’s sole issue.

D ISPOSITION

We have sustained Appellant’s sole issue. Accordingly, we modify the trial court’s

judgment by deleting the plea and finding of “true” to the nonexistent enhancement paragraph.

As modified , we affirm the judgment of the trial court.



### S AM 

### G RIFFITH

Justice

Opinion delivered May 19 , 2010.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)