alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 5737 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 108 West 

D Street in Alpha, Illinois, as the ‘‘Captain Joshua E. Steele Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN JOSHUA E. STEELE POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 108 West D Street in Alpha, Illinois, shall be 

known and designated as the ‘‘Captain Joshua E. Steele Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Captain Joshua E. Steele Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KELVIN FRAZIER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv98-SPM/WCS

EDWIN BUSS, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Second

Report and Recommendation dated June 30, 2011. Doc. 32. Plaintiff has been

furnished a copy and has filed objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). Doc. 33. Despite the objections, I have determined

that the report and recommendation is correct and should be adopted. 

Plaintiff claims that he was issued a false disciplinary report by Officer

P.E. Tucker in retaliation after Plaintiff told Tucker that he was going to file

grievances against him. As correctly noted by the Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s

claim cannot go forward under Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and

Edwards v. Balisok, 504 U.S. 641 (1997), because a judgment in Plaintiff’s favor 

would necessarily imply the invalidity of a disciplinary action that deprived him of

Case 4:11-cv-00098-SPM-WCS Document 34 Filed 07/15/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

good-time credits. Richards v. Dickens, 411 Fed.Appx. 276 (11th Cir. 2011). 

Plaintiff’s case is distinguishable from Muhammad v. Close, 540 U.S. 749, 754-

55 (2004), which was limited to a challenge of the prisoner’s prehearing

confinement and did not involve the elimination of good-time credits. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Second Report and Recommendation 

(doc. 32) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted.

3. The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket that the dismissal is

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of July, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:11cv98-SPMWCS

Case 4:11-cv-00098-SPM-WCS Document 34 Filed 07/15/11 Page 2 of 2
ARUN-EX 10.60-2014.7.31




Exhibit 10.60
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED
CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND HAVE BEEN SEPARATELY FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


 Amendment No. 1 To
Qualcomm Atheros Technology Ltd., Volume Purchase Agreement
This Amendment No. 1 to the Qualcomm Atheros Technology Ltd., Volume Purchase Agreement (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of June 17, 2014 (the “Effective Date”) by and between and Qualcomm Atheros Technology Ltd. (formerly Atheros Technology Ltd., “QATL”), with principal business address at Belvedere Building, 69, Pitts Bay Road, Ground Floor, Pembroke, HM 08, Bermuda, and Aruba Networks, Inc., (“Buyer”) with principal business address at 1344 Crossman Ave., Sunnyvale, CA 94089.
Whereas, QATL and Buyer entered into the Qualcomm Atheros Technology Ltd., Volume Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) effective February 28, 2011, and
Whereas, the parties wish to amend the Agreement as set forth herein.
Therefore, the parties agree as follows:
1.Section 3.1 Delivery is hereby amended and restated in full as follows:
Components will be delivered FCA (Incoterms 2010), QATL’s’ designated factory dock or distribution center dock.  Buyer will pay all costs relating to transportation, delivery, duties and insurance.  [***] will provide QATL with shipping instructions on its order and if it fails to do so, QATL will determine the carrier and means of transportation and will ship the Components freight collect.  Buyer shall notify QATL in writing of any shortage in any shipment within thirty (30) days after Buyer’s receipt of such shipment.  All shipments shall be directed to a Buyer operated receiving location.
2.    Section 9.  [***];
3.    Section 12.9 is hereby amended and restated in full as follows:
12.9 Survival.  The following provisions shall survive the termination of this Agreement or the relationship between QATL and Buyer: Articles: 3.3 Title, 3.4 Exporter and Importer of Record; 4. Returns; 5. Prices; Payment; Taxes, 6. Reservation of Rights; No License; markings, 8. Limited Warranty, 10. Limitation of Liability, 11. Export Compliance and 12. General.
4.    Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

*** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment by persons duly authorized, to be effective as of the Effective Date above written.
	
			
	QUALCOMM ATHEROS TECHNOLOGY LTD.
	 
	Aruba Networks, Inc.

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ James A. F. Watlington    
	 
	/s/ Joshua Cash

	Authorized Signature
	 
	Authorized Signature

	 
	 
	 

	QCA Confidential
	 
	 

	James A. F. Watlington    
	 
	Joshua Cash

	Name
	 
	Name

	 
	 
	 

	Secretary    
	 
	Director, Commercial Counsel

	Title    
	 
	Title    

	 
	 
	 

	18th June 2014
	 
	June 17, 2014

	Date    
	 
	Date
ABRWH

Agenda

Subcommittee on Procedures Review

April 28, 2015

Conference Call Number 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code 9933701

11:00 a.m. EDT Welcome and Roll Call

11:10 Review BRS status All

11:20 OTIB 0054 – Finding 5 – Release fraction wording NIOSH 

- Finding 9 – workbook review - closure SC&A

11:30 PROC 0090 presentation NIOSH

11:40 PROC 0092 presentation NIOSH

12:00 p.m. PER 0031- Report review - carryover NIOSH*

12:30 PER 0045 - proposed resolution to responses SC&A

1:00 Lunch

1:30 PER 0043 – Findings 1, 2, 3 NIOSH

PER 0052 – Findings 1, 2 response NIOSH

PER 047 - Findings 1, 2, 3, 4 NIOSH

2:45 Administrative detail -

Routine note of abeyance items ready for closing NIOSH

Status of case selection recommendations SC&A

Determination of tasking for PER 55, 56, 58 All

Next meeting

3:15 Adjourn

*carryover
# C_2009231EN.01000201.xml

| 25.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 September 2009

2009/C 231/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4768 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4420 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,91065 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1105 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5117 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5100 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,159 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,15 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7075 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1686 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2090 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1860 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6880 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5843 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4457 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0391 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0849 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 766,10 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,9090 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0824 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2740 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 257,22 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1149 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,859 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,2590 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,539 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6401 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7197 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,8490 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4768

JPY

Japanese yen

133,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4420

GBP

Pound sterling

0,91065

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1105

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5117

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5100

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,159

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,15

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7075

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1686

RON

Romanian leu

4,2090

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1860

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6880

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5843

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4457

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0391

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0849

KRW

South Korean won

1 766,10

ZAR

South African rand

10,9090

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0824

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2740

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 257,22

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1149

PHP

Philippine peso

69,859

RUB

Russian rouble

44,2590

THB

Thai baht

49,539

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6401

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7197

INR

Indian rupee

70,8490

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HARRY MICHAEL WRIGHT,

Petitioner, 

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-4-RS-CAS

MICHAEL D. CREWS, Secretary, 

Florida Department of Corrections,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 39) and

Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. 40). I have reviewed the objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and 

incorporated in this Order.

2. The Petitioner’s amended § 2254 petition (Doc. 7) is DENIED.

3. The Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 33) is DENIED. 

4. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner did not 

make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

5. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on October 16, 2013.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MICHAEL G. PROTOS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 561 WAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed March 16, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21

- 1422 Lower Tribunal No. 20

- 6338

________________



### Barry Schneer , Appellant,

vs. 

### Alice Llaurado , Appellee.

A n ap peal from a non - final order from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Jason E. Dimitris , Judge. Barry A. Schneer, in proper person

. Bresky Law , and Robin Bresky, and Jonathan Mann (Boca Raton) , for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.
MILLER , J

.2 In this high

- conflict paternity case, appellant, the father, appeals from orde rs denying his request to modify custody and awarding attorney’s fees

. 1 After the child was injured in Mexico, the father purportedly failed to promptly seek appropriate medical treatment. Appellee, the mother, then sought sole custody. Ostensibly due to a history of domestic violence involving the parents, the trial court temporarily placed the child in the care of a maternal uncle, with both parties subject to supervised timesharing. Se e § 751.05 ( 3) , Fla. Stat. (202 2 )

. Thereafter, the mother renewed her emergency motion for sole custody , and t he father countered with a request to relocate the child into his care or that of the paternal grandmother

. By way of a carefully detailed order, the trial court declined to further modify custody and ordered the father to relinquish the child’s passport . All findings were predicated upon the best interests of the child , and none are contravened by any evidence of record. See § 61. 13 (2)(c) , Fla. Stat. As we lack a transcript, we are deprived of any ability to further review the propriety of the decision

. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So. 2d 1150 , 1152 (Fla. 1979)

. Accordingly, we affirm the order in all respec ts. Affirmed.

1 We dismiss that portion of the appeal from an order imposing attorney’s fees because the notice of appeal was filed more than thirty days after rendition of the order to be reviewed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 (b).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights

# ACTION:

Notice of briefing and meeting.

# Date and Time:

Friday, July 11, 2008; 9:30 a.m.

# Place:

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, Washington, DC 20425.

## Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Approval of Minutes
    - June 6, 2008 Meeting.

III. Staff Director's Report

IV. Motion for Executive Session

                    V. Management and Operations                          ( print page 38173)    
    - Status of FY 2008 Budget.
    - FY 2009 Budget Submission to Congress.

VI. Program Planning
    - 2010 Program Planning.
    - Briefing Report on Racial Categorization in the Census.
    - Briefing Report on the Deliberate Creation of Racially Identifiable School Districts in Omaha, Nebraska.

VII. State Advisory Committee Issues  
    - Arkansas SAC.
    - Wisconsin SAC.

VIII. Other Business
    - DOT Guidance Regarding Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (“DBE”) Program.

IX. Future Agenda Items

X. Adjourn

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8582.

Dated: July 1, 2008.

Emma Monroig, 

Solicitor.

[FR Doc. 08-1410 Filed 7-1-08; 1:29 pm]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 2 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 3 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 4 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 5 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 6 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 7 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 8 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 9 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 10 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 11 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 12 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 13 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 14 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 15 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 16 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 17 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 18 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 19 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 20 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 21 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 22 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 23 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 24 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 25 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 26 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 27 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 28 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 29 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 30 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 31 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 32 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 33 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 34 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 35 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 36 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 37 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 38 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 39 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 40 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 41 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 42 of 43
Case 4:11-cv-00088-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 01/25/12 Page 43 of 43
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Laufer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Carol Laufer Carol Laufer Title: Chief Financial Officer   May 19, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5659 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5659

 To amend the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to provide relief from 
                 the Volcker Rule for community banks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2018

Mrs. Love (for herself and Mr. Huizenga) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 to provide relief from 
                 the Volcker Rule for community banks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Volcker Rule Relief Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. COMMUNITY BANK RELIEF.

    Section 13(h)(1) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1851(h)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (D), by redesignating clauses (i) and 
        (ii) as subclauses (I) and (II), respectively, and adjusting 
        the margins accordingly;
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) through (D) as 
        clauses (i) through (iv), respectively, and adjusting the 
        margins accordingly;
            (3) in the matter preceding clause (i), as so redesignated, 
        in the second sentence, by striking ``institution that 
        functions solely in a trust or fiduciary capacity, if--'' and 
        inserting the following: ``institution--
                    ``(A) that functions solely in a trust or fiduciary 
                capacity, if--'';
            (4) in clause (iv)(II), as so redesignated, by striking the 
        period at the end and inserting ``; or''; and
            (5) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) that does not have, and is not controlled by 
                a covered fund or a bank holding company that has--
                            ``(i) more than $10,000,000,000 in total 
                        consolidated assets; and
                            ``(ii) total trading assets and trading 
                        liabilities, as reported on the most recent 
                        applicable regulatory filing filed by the 
                        institution, that are more than 5 percent of 
                        total consolidated assets.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 14 (Tuesday, January 22, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3735-3736]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-173]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group, Subcommittee H--Clinical Groups, Subcommittee H
    Date: February 25-26, 2008.
    Time: 2:30 p.m. to 4:45 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Timothy C. Meeker, MD, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Resources and Training Review Branch,

[[Page 3736]]

Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 
Executive Boulevard, Room 8103, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594-1279, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#305d55555b554244705d51595c1e5e59581e575f46"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dbb6bebeb0bea9af9bb6bab2b7f5b5b2b3f5bcb4ad">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 14, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-173 Filed 1-18-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>