alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Inter-American Foundation

# Time and Date:

January 28, 2008 9 a.m.-2:30 p.m. 

# Place:

901 N. Stuart Street, Tenth Floor, Arlington, Virginia 22203. 

# Status:

Open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered: 

      - Approval of the Minutes of the October 1, 2007, Meeting of the Board of Directors
      - President's Report
      - Program Update
      - Operations Update
      - Congressional Affairs
      - External Affairs
      - Advisory Council

# Portions to be Open to the Public: 

      - Approval of the Minutes of the October 1, 2007, Meeting of the Board of Directors
      - President's Report
      - Program Update
      - Operations Update
      - Congressional Affairs
      - External Affairs
      - Advisory Council

# Contact Person for more Information:

Jennifer R. Hodges, General Counsel, (703) 306-4320. 

Dated: January 14, 2008. 

Jennifer R. Hodges, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 08-197 Filed 1-16-08; 11:03 am] 

BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David C. Peterschmidt, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Inktomi Corporation on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Intkomi Corporation.


Dated: March 5, 2003                By: /s/ DAVID C. PETERSCHMIDT
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            David C. Peterschmidt
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# Time and Date:

Thursday, January 24, 2008; 2 p.m.

# Place:

Room 410, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland. 

# Status:

Closed to the Public.

# Matters to be Considered:

## Compliance Status Report

The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of compliance matters.

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

Dated: January 15, 2008.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 08-245  Filed 1-17-08; 2:08 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
<PAGE>  

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO. 125 DATED                       Filed Pursuant to
SEPTEMBER 3, 1998 TO PROSPECTUS DATED                  Rule 424(b)(5)
SEPTEMBER 17, 1997, AS SUPPLEMENTED BY                 File No. 333-34087
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENTS DATED OCTOBER 1, 1997

                          CMS ENERGY CORPORATION

    General Term Notes (servicemark of J.W. Korth & Company), Series D
                Due 9 Months to 25 Years from date of issue

     Pursuant to the terms of a Distribution Agreement as supplemented by
certain letter agreements, the Company has appointed the Agents referred
to below as agents through which General Term Notes (servicemark of J.W.
Korth & Company) (the "Notes") may be offered by the Company on a
continuous basis.  Additional Agents may be designated under the
Distribution Agreement from time to time.  Except as set forth herein, the
Notes offered hereby have such terms as are described in the accompanying
Prospectus dated September 17, 1997, as supplemented by the Prospectus
Supplements dated October 1, 1997.

Aggregate Principal Amount:             $ 361,000.00
Original Issue Date 
  (Settlement Date):                    September 9, 1998
Stated Maturity Date:                   August 15, 2005
Issue Price to Public:                  100.00% of Principal Amount
Interest Rate:                          6.500% Per Annum
Interest Payment Dates:                 August 15 and February 15 and
                                        semi-annually thereafter
                                        Commencing February 15, 1999
Survivor's Option:                      [ X ] Yes    [   ] No
Optional Redemption:                    [ X ] Yes    [   ] No

Initial Redemption Date:                August 15, 2000
Redemption Price:                       Initially 101.00% of Principal
                                        Amount and 100% after the first
                                        anniversary of the Initial
                                        Redemption Date.

                                        Principal Amount of Notes
           Agent                        Solicited by Each Agent

Prudential Securities Incorporated      $  76,000.00
First of Michigan Corporation           $  15,000.00
J.W. Korth & Company                    $ 270,000.00
           Total                        $ 361,000.00

                                        Per Note Sold by
                                        Agents To Public         Total

Issue Price:                            $   1,000.00        $ 361,000.00
Agent's Discount or Commission:         $       7.00        $   2,527.00
Maximum Dealer's Discount or            
  Selling Concession:                   $      18.50        $   6,678.50
Proceeds to the Company:                $     974.50        $ 351,794.50

CUSIP Number:  12589QZL3
<page>
	  				        EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Christian Angstadt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan
Stanley Managed Futures MV, L.P.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

    b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant?s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant?s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant?s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant?s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant?s internal
control over financial reporting; and


<page>
5.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant?s auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant?s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant?s ability to record, process, summarize, and
report financial information; and

    b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant?s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  November 20, 2008   By: /s/Christian Angstadt
                                  Christian Angstadt
                                  Chief Financial Officer,
                                  Demeter Management Corporation,
                                  general partner of the registrant
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRIANNA ALBANO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 619 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
----

----

|  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February 21, 2018 | By:    |   /s/ David Gasparine                            |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               | Name:  | David Gasparine                                       |
|                               | Title: | Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer |
Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Dose Reconstruction Review Methods Work Group Teleconference

November 5, 2015

Conference Phone: 1-866-659-0537; Participant Code: 9933701#

AGENDA

10:00 a.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll call

1. Dose reconstruction findings statistics (SC&A report)

2. Possible paths forward for individual case reviews

3. Plans for November Board meeting discussion

Adjourn
1 No. 14-15-00586-CV 

# In the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth Judicial District Houston, Texas

F AIRFIELD I NDUSTRIES , I NC

. D / B / A F AIRFIELD N ODAL , Appellant

, v.

EP E NERGY E&P C OMPANY , L.P. F / K / A E L P ASO E&P C OMPANY , L.P., Appellee.

On Appeal from the 157th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014-11062



### A PPELLANT 

### ’ S 

### N OTICE OF 

### A PPEARANCE OF 

### C OUNSEL AND 

### D ESIGNATION OF 

### L EAD 

### C OUNSEL

T O T HE H ONORABLE F OURTEENTH C OURT OF A PPEALS :

Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6, Appellant, Appellant Fairfield Industries, Inc.

d/b/a FairfieldNodal, files this Notice of Appearance of Counsel and Designation of

Lead Counsel on appeal as follows:

1. Appellant designates the followi ng attorneys of the law firm of

Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, as counsel on appeal: ACCEPTED 14-15-00586-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 7/17/2015 5:10:23 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2 Sean D. Jordan State Bar No. 00790988 sean.jordan@sutherland.com Kent C. Sullivan State Bar No. 19487300 kent.sullivan@sutherland.com Danica L. Milios State Bar No. 00791261 danica.milios@sutherland.com Peter C. Hansen State Bar No. 24066668 peter.hansen@sutherland.com S UTHERLAND A SBILL & B RENNAN LLP 600 Congress Ave., Suite 2000 Austin, Texas 78701 [Tel.] (512) 721-2679 [Fax] (512) 721-2656

2. Pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 6.1, Appellant here by designates Sean D.

Jordan as lead counsel on appeal.

3. Appellant respectfully requests that the Court and other counsel in this

case note this designation and send all fu rther correspondence, orders, or other

communications to the undersigned.3 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Sean D. Jordan Sean D. Jordan State Bar No. 00790988 sean.jordan@sutherland.com Kent C. Sullivan State Bar No. 19487300 kent.sullivan@sutherland.com Danica L. Milios State Bar No. 00791261 danica.milios@sutherland.com Peter C. Hansen State Bar No. 24066668 peter.hansen@sutherland.com S UTHERLAND A SBILL & B RENNAN LLP 600 Congress Ave., Suite 2000 Austin, Texas 78701 [Tel.] (512) 721-2679 [Fax] (512) 721-2656

C OUNSEL FOR A PPELLANT4 C ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 17, 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing

document was served via eFile.TXCourts. gov, U.S. Certified Mail, return receipt

requested, or by FedEx on the following:

Mr. Thomas W. Paterson Mr. Robert S. Safi Ms. Abigail C. Noebels S USMAN G ODFREY L.L.P. 1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100 Houston, Texas 77002-5096 tpaterson@susmangodfrey.com rsafi@susmangodfrey.com anoebels@susmangodfrey.com

Mr. James A. Porter Ms. S. Pilar Gravitt Grantham EP E NERGY 1001 Louisiana Street Houston, Texas 77002 james.porter@epenergy.com pilar.grantham@epenergy.com

C OUNSEL FOR A PPELLEE

/s/ Sean D. Jordan Sean D. Jordan
#### Edward Myers *v.*Charles J. Whiston, *Sheriff*Of Monongalia County

(No. 13674)

Decided October 25, 1977.

*Richard E. Rowe, Wilson, Frame, Rowe & Jolliffe,*for petitioner.

S. *J. Angotti,*for respondent.

Harshbarger, Justice:

Edward Myers seeks release from the Monongalia County jail, where he reposes at the order of Circuit Judge Marvin Kiger for contempt of Kiger’s order to him to pay $400.00 per month child support.

Beverly Myers obtained divorce from Edward in 1973. Edward, then a nonresident, was served by publication and did not appear. The divorce decree awarded Mrs. Myers custody of the couple’s four children, and support and maintenance for them. The court, because it did not have personal service on Mr. Myers, could not set an amount for support and maintenance.

Myers paid periodic voluntary support payments to his wife amounting to $1240 between October 1974 and August 1975, when he petitioned for change of custody of his children.

*738Mrs. Myers then moved to amend the original decree to require Myers to pay $400 per month child support.

A hearing was held September 5, 1975. Evidence was introduced by both parties on the custody issue, during which Myers, supporting his financial ability to care for the children, testified that he earned about $9,000 in 1974. There was no other evidence about his debts and expenses and none about her income, except that there was implication that another man helped with her expenses.

After the hearing the Court ordered him to pay the $400 she asked for; but he paid only $200 per month. In December, 1975, after a hearing on a rule to show cause why he should not be held in contempt, he was sent to jail.

Our law is clear. *W. Va. Code,*48-12-16 states:

> “All judges and courts of this State, called upon to fix, ascertain and determine an amount as alimony, support or maintenance to be paid by a spouse or to modify any order pertaining thereto, shall take into consideration, among other things, the financial needs of the parties, the earnings and earning ability of the husband and wife, the estate, real and personal, and the extent thereof as well as the income derived therefrom of both the husband and wife and shall allow, or deny, alimony or maintenance or modify any former order with relation thereto, in accordance with the principles of justice.” (1933, c. 27; 1969, c. 49.)

*See, Nield v. Nield,*126 W. Va. 430, 28 S.E.2d 825 (1944) which provides that in an action for modification of a decree of divorce relating to the amount to be paid for support of children of divorced parents, facts and circumstances should be alleged and established by proof, from which the necessity and legality of the modification of the former decree may be made to appear.

*State ex rel. Trembly v. Whiston,*_ W. Va. _, 220 S.E.2d 690 (1975), has set the rule that when a court *739finds contempt of an order that is clearly wrong, or not supported by the evidence, the contempt order will be reversed.

The basic order was wrong. There was insufficient evidence upon which to charge $400 per month and *no*evidence to the points required by statute to be considered by the court.

*Writ awarded.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CITIZENS STATE BANK,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 1:10cv224-SPM/GRJ

DIXIE COUNTY,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT

After Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint (doc. 5), Plaintiff

filed a First Amended Complaint (doc. 11). Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND

ADJUDGED that Defendant’s motion to dismiss the original complaint (doc. 5) is

DENIED AS MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-eighth day of December, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case No. OP 23
-0331 MATTHEW G. MONFORTON , Petitioner v. AUSTIN KNUDSEN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MONTANA ATTORNEY GENERAL; CHRISTI JACOBSEN, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF STATE Respondent s. **ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS**  **AMICUS CURIAE** Upon consideration of the motion filed the Montana League of Cities and Towns , the Montana Association of Counties , and the Montana Quality Education Coalition for leave to file an am icus curiae brief in support of Respondents , IT IS ORDERED that the motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amicus brief shall be prepared, filed, and served by July 14 , 202 3 .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2023

07/12/2023

Case Number: OP 23-0331
EXHIBIT 32





Neohydro Technologies Corp.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neohydro Technologies Corp.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Gasparine, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  November 19, 2013
By:
/s/ David GasparineName:
David GasparineTitle:
Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00277-CR

Antonio Colin a/k/a Antonio Miguel Caballero

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

226th District Court of Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-CR-12855

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 4, 2021