alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00450- CV

In re Edw in Darnell Will iam s, Jr.

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM B ASTROP CO UNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator Edwin Dar

nell Wil liams, J r. filed a documen t i n t h e trial court titled,

“ Pl a in ti f f ’ s O r ig in a l A

p p li c a ti o n f o r Wr it o f M a

n d a mu s . ” T h a

t d o c u me n t, w h ic h h e s ty

le d a s in te n d e d for the Texas Court of Criminal Appea ls, c omplains tha t the sentenc e imposed by the trial court in its 2009 criminal proce eding ag ainst him was void, that his g uilty plea was involuntary , and that his trial counsel did not file a notice of a

ppeal a s he requested. The trial court did not take a ny action

on the document, and the trial court cler k forwa rded it to this Cour t , wh ere it was dockete d as a petition for writ of manda mus. We have revie wed the document and all the claims raised. The complaints asser ted by rela tor are the sort of claims that must be raised by way of a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07; see also Olivo v. State , 918 S.W .2d 519, 525 n.8 (“the exclusive post-conviction reme dy in final felony convictions in Texas courts is throug h

a writ of habea s corpus pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. ar t
. 1 1

. 0 7 ”) ; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals , 802 S.W .2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (cour t of appea ls may not enter mandamus order in criminal proce eding unless there is no adequate reme dy at law and soug ht act is minist eria l,not discretionar y ; in post-conviction felony proce eding , adequate reme dy at law is available by way of appl i ca t ion for writ of habeas corpus); In re Bradley , No. 03-12-00744-CV, 2013 WL 150284, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin J an. 9, 2013, orig

. proce eding ) (inmate filed petition for writ of mandamus seeking to have conviction set aside as void; this Court held that relief s o u gh t “a m o u nts to relief that is availa b l e t hroug h a writ of habea s corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the code of criminal proce dure” and that “this Court is without jurisdi ction to gr ant re lief in such ca ses”)

. 1

We dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction. See Bradley , 2013 WL 150284, at *1.

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Filed: Aug ust 26, 2015

Relator states in his petition that he soug ht habea s relief and was denied, but that does not 1 mean that we somehow now have jurisdiction and may g rant relief that the court of criminal appea ls has alre ady

denied. 2
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 51 (Friday, March 14, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 13829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1031]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting; (Canceled)

Date and Time:  Wednesday, March 12, 2008 3 p.m.-3:45 p.m.

Place:  Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

Closed Meeting:  The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international 
broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and 
personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating 
to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This 
meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose 
matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the 
interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 
U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) 
In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal 
personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International 
Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6)).

Contact Person for More Information:  Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Timi Nickerson Kenealy at (202) 203-
4545.

    Dated: March 11, 2008.
Timi Nickerson Kenealy,
Acting Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 08-1031 Filed 3-11-08; 4:36 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date: 

1 p.m., Monday, May 19, 2008. 

# Place: 

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. 

# Status:

 Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

Rule Enforcement Review. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084. 

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 08-1164 Filed 4-16-08; 4:02 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SCOTT CARSWELL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cv486-SPM/WCS

LISA ECHEVERRI, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________/

ORDER REMANDING CLAIMS AGAINST LISA ECHEVERRI AS EXECUTIVE

DIRECTOR OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Florida Department of

Revenue’s motions to expedite and to dismiss or remand. Docs. 26 and 27. The

Florida Department of Revenue maintains that it has not expressly consented to

the removal of this case and has not waived its Eleventh Amendment Immunity. 

Plaintiff agrees and states that any feature or claim relating to the Florida

Department of Revenue should be remanded to the state court. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant Florida Department of Revenue’s motion to expedite and

alternative motion to remand (docs. 26 and 27) are granted. The motion to

dismiss (doc. 26) is denied as moot.
Page 2 of 2

2. Plaintiffs’ claims against Lisa Echeverri, as Executive Director of the

Florida Department of Revenue, acting in her official capacity, are remanded to

the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, Florida.

3. The Court retains jurisdiction of the claims against the other

defendants subject to Plaintiffs’ motion to remand (doc. 23).

DONE ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:10cv486-SPM/WCS
Exhibit 4.26.2





Amendment Agreement



to General Agreement (Agreement # 1605) dated May 16, 1997



|       |  |                  
|------ |  | -----------------
|Moscow |  | December 23, 2004



The Parties to the General Agreement
(Agreement # 1605) dated May 16, 1997 (the Agreement) have entered into this Amendment Agreement as follows:



1. Amend Clause 2.1 of the Agreement to read as follows:



2.1 In the capacity of Impuls agent conclude and terminate agreements on provision of Bee Line Services both in the name of Impuls and in its own name.



2. Add new sub-clause 2.13 to the Agreement to read as follows:



2.13 Perform any other agency functions to fulfill its obligations hereunder.



3. Add the following sentence to sub-clause 4.4 of the Agreement:



The difference between the proceeds received from subscribers and the amounts paid
to Impuls shall be owned by VimpelCom as of the moment the same is credited to VimpelComs settlement account.



4. Add sub-clause 10.9 to clause 10 of the Agreement to read as follows:



10.9 This Agreement is a mixed contract and comprises both the elements of agency relations and the elements of other civil law transactions, and by virtue of
clause 3 Art. 421 of the Russian Civil Code the parties relations hereunder shall be governed, respectively, by the rules applicable to agreements the elements of which this Agreement comprises.



This Amendment Agreement shall come into force upon approval by the Boards of Directors of
OAO VimpelCom and OAO KB Impuls and shall govern the parties relations arising from the date of the Agreement to December 31, 2003.



|                 |  |                           
|---------------- |  | --------------------------
|KB Impuls        |  | VimpelCom                 
|                 | 
|/signed/         |  | /signed/                  
|                 | 
|A.V. Izosimov    |  | Ye.A. Shmatova            
|General Director |  | Vice President for Finance
|OAO KB Impuls    |  | OAO VimpelCom             
|                 | 
|/SEAL/           |  | /SEAL/
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 4279

JOHN GRAY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN OF JESSUP CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. Ellen L. Hollander , District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv - 01976

- ELH )

Submitted : October 19, 2021 Decided: October 21, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE , Circuit Judge , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. John Gray, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Gray seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 148 & n.9 (2012) (explaining that § 2254 petitions are subject to one

- year statute of li mitations, running from latest of four commencement dates enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealabili ty will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When, as here, the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ru ling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez , 565 U.S. at 140

- 41 (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gray h as not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
----

| 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 , fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report for the period ending March 31, 2011 , fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spartan Gold Ltd. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 13, 2011                                                                                 |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                               |   |
| /s/ William H. Whitmore, Jr.                                                                       |   |
| William H. Whitmore, Jr.President and Interim Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |   |
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




In connection with Quarterly Report of Reach Messaging Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




Date: August 23, 2010
By:
/s/  David R. WellsDavid R. WellsChief Financial Officer




A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday April 18, 2008.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 08-1048  Filed 3-14-08; 11:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Presidential Documents

27719 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 94 

Wednesday, May 14, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Presidential Determination No. 2008–19 of May 5, 2008 

Proposed Agreement Between the Government of the United 

States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation for Cooperation in the Field of Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of Energy 

I have considered the proposed Agreement Between the Government of 

the United States of America and the Government of the Russian Federation 

for Cooperation in the Field of Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy, along 

with the views, recommendations, and statements of interested agencies. 

I have determined that the performance of the Agreement will promote, 

and will not constitute an unreasonable risk to, the common defense and 

security. Pursuant to section 123 b. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 

as amended (42 U.S.C. 2153(b)), I hereby approve the proposed Agreement 

and authorize the Secretary of State to arrange for its execution. 

The Secretary of State is authorized to publish this determination in the 

Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, May 5, 2008. 

[FR Doc. 08–1263 

Filed 5–13–08; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES5GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# Time and Date:

10 a.m. (Eastern Time), July 21, 2008. 

# Place:

4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

# Status:

Parts will be open to the public and parts closed to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

## Parts Open to the Public 

1. Approval of the minutes of the June 30, 2008, Board member meeting. 

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director. 

a. Monthly Participant Activity Report. 

b. Legislative Report. 

3. Quarterly Reports. 

a. Investment Performance and Policy Review. 

b. Vendor Financial Reports. 

4. Report on Potential Risk of Loss to TSP Assets as a result of the Theoretical Insolvency of Barclays Global Investors. 

## Parts Closed to the Public 

5. Confidential Vendor Financial Data. 

# Contact Person For More Information:

Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640. 

Dated: July 14, 2008. 

Thomas K. Emswiler, 

Secretary,  Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. 

[FR Doc. 08-1443 Filed 7-15-08; 9:58 am] 

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN ;’

. . a-c.blAm ~-oP(EAb . . ;

EonorableH. D. Stringer CountyAttorney Hall County mzphis, Texas DearSir:

tsx .0olleo-

"1 amof course familiar with 1prt.7332, R. S. whioh says the.fee for the County Attorney in delinquent tax suits shall only be that prcsoribsd by da Article. However, Art. 7345b being a later enaotment,and Sec. 13 providing that in case or oonfliot the provisions of said Article should oontrol, it oo-HocorableE. D. Stringer, Page 2

OUrr0a to roethat I w0Uia be entitled to the fee set out in Seo. 0. "Itwould‘setxh

that this oonstruotion xould be a logioal one because the fee prescribedby Art. 7332 is wholly inadequate." T?is departmenthas heretofore ruled on a question very similar to that presented in your inquiry in opinion x0. C-1695. In that opinion it was held that Seotion 6 ofArticle 7345b did not apply to county or district attornsys'rezardingfees in delinquent tax suits. The county or districtattorney is entitled to only those fees as are pro*?iaed

by Article 7332, Vernon's Annotated Civil StatUtsS. Ye are enolosing a copy 0r said opinion for your in;'omation.

In view of the statutesmentioned 15 opinion MO. O-1595,you are respectfullyadvised that it is the opinion ofthis aepartnent that the county attorney is not entitled totan per cent of delinquent tax collectionsas mentioned inpour inq*uiry,

or any other compensation,but is entitled toonly such fees as are provided by Article 7332, Vernon's annotatedCivil Statutes. Our opinionNo. O-836 is hereby 3verri:led

in so far as it ccnfliotswith this opinion and Qinion No. O-159S.

Trusting that the foregoing fully answers your knquiry,

we are

;SISTAKT IGZNERAL Yours very truly ATTOFUEY GK?ERAL OF TZXAS

BY Araell W.lliam3

Assistant



### COMMn-rPL
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 4:11cv314-RH/GRJ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GARY RESIL,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv314-RH/GRJ

JARED MILLER et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 21. No objections have been filed. Upon 

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is DISMISSED 

without prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on March 4, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00314-RH-GRJ Document 22 Filed 03/04/12 Page 1 of 1