alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Status of AWE Work Group 

Activities Related to Electro Met

Presented by Henry Anderson

Chairman of AWE Work Group

ABRWH Meeting

February 28-29, 2010
Work Group Focus

• Focus has been on review of original and 

revised NIOSH Evaluation Reports (ER) for 

Petition SEC-00136 

• Only incidental review of 2007 Site Profile: 

Appendix C Electro Metallurgical Company 

(TBD-6001)and 2011 Technical Basis 

Document for the Electro Metallurgical 

Company has been performed 
AWE Work Group 

Electro Metallurgical Corporation SEC Petition Review

• 7/ 21/ 2009 NIOSH issues original SEC ER

• 10/2009 - SEC ER presented to Full Board and review assigned to AWE (6001)

• 4/ 2010 SC&A provides report reviewing ER

• 7/7/10 AWE workgroup meeting - begins discussion using matrix approach

• 5/2/11 SC&A issues revision to review report adding interview results

• 5/16/2011 AWE Work Group meeting - NIOSH update report

• 8/16/2011 AWE Work Group meeting – Most matrix issues resolved ; NIOSH 

indicates they are revising ER recommendations; further discussion on hold

• 2/7/2012 NIOSH publishes revised ER – proposing to accept early years as SEC 

• 2/21/2012 AWE workgroup meets - SC&A provides comments based on 

time-limited review of revised ER – Dose reconstruction can be done on all

• 2/21/2012 AWE Work Group votes to provisionally accept NIOSH’s SEC 

recommendations; 

• 2/22/2012 – 2/28/2012 NIOSH and SC&A to discuss differences

• Unresolved issues on SEC to be discussed at Oakland full Board Meeting 
AWE Work Group 

Electro Metallurgical Corporation 2011 TBD and 2007 

6001 Appendix Review

• 12/2006 NIOSH publishes TBD-6001 

• 12/2007 NIOSH adds Appendix C (Electro Metallurgical) 

to TBD-6001 

• 2/2011 NIOSH replaces Appendix C with stand-alone TBD 

for Electro Met

• 2011 AWE Workgroup matrix identifies TBD clarifications 

needed, most are resolved

• Awaiting Process for TBD changes
Current Status

• Most of SC&A findings related to review of 

NIOSH 2009 ER have been resolved in an SEC 

context except those relating to ability to 

reconstruct bounding internal doses for early 

operations and definition of proposed SEC 

class 
Resolution of SC&A Findings on 

Original ER 

See SCA-TR-SEC2012-0010 (2/21/2012)

• Open Issues – 2

• Related to dose reconstruction not SEC issues 

– 6

• Not relevant to ElectroMet – 2

• Addressed in Revised ER of 2/7/2012 - 7 
Current Status – Discussed by SC&A

• SC&A believes that internal bounding doses can 

be calculated for early operations (prior to 1948) 

based on extensive air sampling data (1948/1949) 

and the fact that bioassay sampling in 1944 is not 

statistically different from that in 1949 

• If an SEC is granted, SC&A believes that 

consideration should be given to limiting 

proposed class to workers in the Area Plant 

where MED/AEC operations were conducted and 

not those who worked in all areas at Electro Met
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolfe Creek Mining, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kristen
Paul, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
4th day of August, 2008.


/s/ Kristen Paul
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 11

Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC

Schedule of Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per
Common Unit

For the Periods



|                                             |  |                                         |           |   |                                         |   |           |                                         |  |   |           |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- | --------- | - | --------------------------------------- | - | --------- | --------------------------------------- |  | - | --------- | -
|                                             |  | January 1, 2007ThroughDecember 31, 2007 |           |   | January 1, 2006ThroughDecember 31, 2006 |   |           | January 1, 2005ThroughDecember 31, 2005 | 
|Net Income (Loss)                            |  | $                                       | (360,901  | ) |                                         | $ | (171,661  | )                                       |  | $ | (743,000  | )
|                                             |  |                                         |           |   |                                         |   |           |                                         |  |   |           |  
|Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding |  |                                         | 4,222,870 |   |                                         |   | 4,222,870 |                                         |  |   | 4,222,870 |  
|                                             |  |                                         |           |   |                                         |   |           |                                         |  |   |           |  
|Earnings (Loss) per Unit                     |  | $                                       | (0.09     | ) |                                         | $ | (0.04     | )                                       |  | $ | (0.18     | )
|                                             |  |                                         |           |   |                                         |   |           |                                         |  |   |           |
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 6070

SOLOMON NIMROD BUTLER , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. JAMIE L. BULLARD , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:21

- hc

- 02045

- BO )

Submitted : July 13, 2022 Decided: August 1, 2022

Before THACKER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Solomon Nimrod Butler , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6070 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/01/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Solomon Nimrod Butler seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue ab sent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debat able and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude tha t Butler has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argumen t would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6070 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/01/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)

SC&A Review of the 

NIOSH Site Profile Review 

(ORAUT-TKBS-0049, rev. 01, April 2007)

Joseph Fitzgerald

SC&A

February 2012

Oakland, CA
BACKGROUND

• Site profile of LBNL issued by NIOSH on April 2, 2007 (revised 

version issued on May 10, 2010).

• SC&A tasked by Advisory Board to review site profile; 

conducted Jan-Oct 2009, and included onsite data capture 

and site expert interviews.

• SC&A draft report issued on January 22, 2010; contained 13 

primary findings and 8 secondary findings.

• NIOSH issued SEC evaluation report for SEC-00160 on Jan 20, 

2010; SEC subsequently approved for period 1942-1961.

• Advisory Board working group for LBNL met on Feb. 3, 2012 to 

begin review of SC&A site profile findings and NIOSH 

response.
FINDINGS

1. Inadequate documentation of historical operations and rad 

sources

2. Insufficient information to support internal dose 

reconstruction (e.g., MDA’s)

3. Special forms of tritium and plutonium not addressed

4. External and internal dose records – legacy, completeness, 

accuracy not addressed adequately 

5. Insufficient justification for selection of IREP energy range 

fractions for photon exposures (Table 6-2)

6. Insufficiency of neutron dosimetry treatment

7. Failure to justify the shallow dose: Deep dose assumption
FINDINGS (cont’d)

 8. Uncertainty in beta-gamma dosimeter response to radiation

 types and energies

 9. Medical x-ray exposures are uncertain.

10. Uncertainty of calculating internal doses prior to 1961.

11. Inadequacy of bioassay analyses presentation.

12. Failure to provide sufficient guidance for unmonitored 

 workers.

13. Inadequate coverage of occupational environmental dose.
SC&A actions

• LBNL work group identified actions for both NIOSH and SC&A

• SC&A will be reviewing revised NIOSH site profile and other 

added technical documents, addressing:

– Further review of LBNL dosimetry records regarding miminum

detectable thresholds (MDA’s) for specific radionuclides prior to 1961

– How non-uniform exposures addressed 

– How shallow dose addressed 

– How tritides and high-fired Pu addressed 

– Further review of dose reconstruction approach for neutron exposures
Draft Agenda
 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health
 

The Westin Cincinnati
 

21 East Fifth Street
 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
 

(513) 621-7700
 

January 7-8, 2003
 

Tuesday - January 7, 2003 

8:00 a.m. - 8:30 a.m.	 Registration and Welcome Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary 

8:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Review and Approval of 	 Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair

 Draft Minutes,

 Meetings 8 & 9 

9:00 a.m. - 9:15 a.m. Program Status Report	 Mr. Dave Sundin, NIOSH 

9:15 a.m. - 9:30 a.m.	 Status of Dose Reconstruction Dr. James Neton, NIOSH 

 and Contract Support 

9:30 a.m. - 10:00 a..m.	 AWE Site Profile Development Dr. James Neton, NIOSH 

ORAU Team 

10:00 a.m. - 10:15 a.m.	 Break 

10:15 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Dose Reconstruction Workgroup	 Mr. Mark Griffon, Workgroup Chair 

12:00 p.m. - 1:30 p.m.	 Lunch 

1:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.	 Board Discussion/Working Session 

Draft Attachments A, C, D, & E 

2:30 p.m. - 2:45 p.m.	 Break 

2:45 p.m. - 4:00 p.m.	 Board Discussion/Working Session 

4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.	 Public Comment Period 

5:00 p.m.	 Adjourn 

***Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.*** 
Draft Agenda
 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health
 

The Westin Cincinnati
 

21 East Fifth Street
 

Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
 

(513) 621-7700
 

January 7-8, 2003
 

Wednesday - January 8, 2003 

8:00 a.m. - 8:30 a.m. Registration and Welcome Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary 

8:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Administrative Housekeeping Ms. Cori Homer, NIOSH

 and Board Work Schedule Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 

Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary 

9:00 a.m. - 9:45 a.m. Public Comment Period 

9:45 a.m. Adjourn Public Session 

10:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. Closed Session for development, review, and discussion 

of the proposed Independent Government Cost Estimate (IGCE) 

for a contract. 

***Agenda Items are subject to change as priorities dictate.*** 

Page 2
V 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5668 

For the relief of Mykhaylo Gnatyuk and Melnik Gnatyuk. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2018 

Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Mykhaylo Gnatyuk and Melnik Gnatyuk. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR 

4 MYKHAYLO GNATYUK AND MELNIK 

5 GNATYUK. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Mykhaylo Gnatyuk and Melnik Gnatyuk shall each 

9 be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjust10 ment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 

11 permanent residence upon filing an application for 

12 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5668 IH

1 Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resi2 dent. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Mykhaylo Gnatyuk 

4 or Melnik Gnatyuk enters the United States before the 

5 filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he or she shall 

6 be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 

7 shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of 

8 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation9 ality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap12 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica13 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

14 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

15 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

16 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res17 idence to Mykhaylo Gnatyuk and Melnik Gnatyuk, the 

18 Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to re19 duce by 2, during the current or next following fiscal year, 

20 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail21 able to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under 

22 section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 

23 if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are 

24 made available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth 

25 under section 202(e) of such Act. 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5668 IH

1 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

2 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

3 parents, brothers, and sisters of Mykhaylo Gnatyuk and 

4 Melnik Gnatyuk shall not, by virtue of such relationship, 

5 be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi6 gration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference of the

Pantex Work Group

August 4, 2016

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

10:30 a.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll-call 

DISCUSSION

Status of site profile issues: 2014 TBD Matrix, last WG meeting (9/4/2014), recent TBD reviews

Remaining site profile issues:

1. Site profile issue #11 (SEC Issue #6-12): Interpretation of external dosimetry data

• SC&A review (March 7, 2016) 

• NIOSH response (May 24, 2016)

2. Site profile issue #2 (SEC Issue #7, 6-22

): Data do not support assumption that 95th percentile 

neutron-to-photon ratio is bounding for all exposure scenarios

• SC&A review (March 7, 2016)

• NIOSH response (Mary 24, 2016)

• Additional clarification item: OTIB-086, Table 7-2: Mark R. to check why 1975 CW neutron 

dose is 10x that for other years (3/18/2016 email).

Next Steps

Adjourn

 

1 Numbering for site profile issues based that contained in SC&A report, SC&A’s Evaluation of Revisions to Pantex 

Technical Basis Documents Relevant to Site Profile and SEC Issues, February 2016. 2 Numbering used in NIOSH response to SC&A’s review, May 24, 2016.
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the 

Linde Ceramics Work Group 

February 15, 2012 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537 

Participant Pass Code: 9933701 

10:00 a.m. Eastern Time 

 Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

 SC&A Report 

o	 Results of evaluation of tunnel maps and worker statements/interviews to 

help resolve the issue of when utility tunnels were built. 

o Input on issue of occupancy factors for worker exposures in tunnels. 

 Linde Ceramics Worker Representative Letter &/or Comments 

o	 Review of tunnel maps 

o Worker input 

 Linde Ceramics Worker Comments 

 WG Discussion and Recommendations 

 DCAS TBD Revision/Implementation Plans 

 Adjourn
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the 

Savannah River Site Work Group 

December 2, 2011 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537 Participant Pass Code: 9933701 

10:00 a.m. Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

Work Group Discussion 

1. SC&A review of SRS cases for thorium class definition 

2. Petitioner questions/comments 

3. Work group recommendations or action items (path forward) for thorium class definition 

4. Status of DCAS work on matrix issues: 

• Post 1972 thorium 

• Trivalent actinides (Am, Cm, Cf) 

• Np-237 

• Fission and activation products 

• Co-60 

• Exotics 

5. Plans for report to the Board 

Adjourn
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 19 (Tuesday, January 29, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 5194]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-364]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Personalized 
Healthcare Workgroup Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 12th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Personalized Healthcare Workgroup in accordance 
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., 
App.)

DATES: February 14, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. [Eastern Time].

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/healthcare/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will discuss possible common 
data standards to incorporate interoperable, clinically useful genetic/
genomic information and analytical tools into Electronic Health Records 
(EHRs) to support clinical decision-making for the clinician and 
consumer.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/healthcare/phc_instruct.html.

    Dated: January 17, 2008.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 08-364 Filed 1-28-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-45-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

          - 42 CFR Part 5 and 51c 
          - RIN 0906-AA44 

# AGENCY:

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of public comment period. 

# SUMMARY:

On April 21, 2008, HHS published a 30-day extension to the public comment period and provided clarification on the notice of proposed rulemaking, “Designation of Medically Underserved Populations and Health Professional Shortage Areas” (73 FR 21300). HHS and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) have received requests for a further extension to the comment period. In consideration of these requests, HHS is extending the comment period an additional 30 days, with a new closing date of June 30, 2008. 

# DATES:

                        Written comments on this proposed rule must be submitted on or before June 30, 2008. Please refer to                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         for additional information.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Andy Jordan, 301-594-0197. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

During the public comment period, HRSA has encouraged State Primary Care Offices (PCOs) to apply the proposed methodology using their own State and local data to see how well it works in identifying areas in need in their States. HRSA has provided assistance, tools, and data to support States in their efforts and will continue to do so. In order to facilitate a better understanding of the proposed rule, HRSA provided PCOs with a calculator that applies the formulas proposed in the rule to determine designation, with data files, as well as with technical assistance in using the calculator. HRSA has also provided the names of PCOs who, with their expertise with different data sources, may be able to offer some technical assistance to their colleagues. 

Dated: May 29, 2008. 

Elizabeth M. Duke, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 08-1314 Filed 5-29-08; 2:55 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4152-01-P
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SAM J. PEARSON IV,

 Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:11cv70/MCR/EMT

JUDGE DAVID RIMMER,

 Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated March 25, 2011. (Doc. 7). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of May, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00070-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 05/02/11 Page 1 of 1