alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hanford

Special Exposure Cohort 

Update

Samuel Glover, PhD

Research Health Scientist

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

August 2011

Richland, WA
Petitions and Classes

 One current SEC petition remains before the Advisory Board 

• Addresses the U.S. testing data for plutonium finishing plant 

employees for the petitioner requested timeframe 1987 thru 1989

 Three existing SEC classes previously enacted at Hanford:

1. October 1, 1943 through August 31, 1946, for selected areas of 

Hanford (SEC-00057-1)

2. September 1, 1946 through December 31, 1968, for selected areas 

of Hanford (SEC-00057-2)

3. October 1, 1943 through June 30, 1972, for all areas of Hanford 

(this class subsumed previous two classes; SEC-00152) and went 

into affect in January 2010
Hanford Claims at NIOSH

 Total claims: 4,156 

 Active claims: 160

 Pulled claims: 742

 Completed claims: 3,254 

• 1,058 >50% POC
Compensation from EEOICPA
Activities

 NIOSH has continued to evaluate the source-term 

data and availability of data to support dose 

reconstruction for a number of activities and 

facilities since 2009.

 The Advisory Board and/or its contractor SC&A 

have participated in all of these activities.

 NIOSH will include the reports issued by SC&A as 

it further develops a series of white papers to 

address various radionuclides, activities, and 

facilities at Hanford.
Work Completed

 We have submitted 53 official requests to Hanford (Data 

Capture Activity 53 will be submitted this week)

• These include other EEOICPA facilities

 We have reviewed 424 boxes of data (including boxes we 

are reviewing this week)

 We have visited Hanford 41 times (includes trips made to 

scan documents after reviews have been complete or 

Hanford has requested documents)

 We have received 8,974 documents from Hanford

 Many classified and unclassified interviews have been 

conducted by NIOSH and SC&A
| 1. | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 13, 2009 | By:   /s/ Lior      Ostashinsky                            |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Lior      Ostashinsky                                                     |
|                         | President      and Treasurer (Principal Executive and Financial  Officer) |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

1 p.m., Wednesday, March 5, 2008. 

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. 

# Status:

Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

Rule Enforcement Review. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084. 

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 08-456 Filed 1-29-08; 1:03 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pansoft Company Limited (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”), I, Hugh Wang, Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





November 13, 2009
/s/ Hugh WangHugh WangChairman (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 3.2





CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT





TO THE





BY-LAWS





OF





L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.








L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (the “ Corporation ”), a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as amended, does hereby certify that Section 1 of ARTICLE III of the By-Laws of the Corporation shall hereby be amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:





“ Section 1 . Number .  Subject to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Board of Directors shall consist of not less than eight nor more than fifteen members as may be determined by the Board of Directors.  After any such determination, the number so determined shall continue as the authorized number of members of the Board until the same shall be changed as aforesaid.  Directors need not be shareholders.”








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be executed and acknowledged on its behalf by its duly authorized officer as of this 22nd day of April, 2022.


L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.





By:  /s/ Scott T. Mikuen





Name:        Scott T. Mikuen


Title:        Senior Vice President,        General Counsel and Secretary
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned,Robert M. Dunn, the
Chief Executive OfficerofREMUDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION(the “Company”), DOES
HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed
this statement this12thday of May,
2010.





/s/ Robert M. DunnRobert M. DunnChief Executive
  Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided toREMUDA
INVESTMENT CORPORATIONand will be retained
byREMUDA INVESTMENT CORPORATIONand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2008 of Auburn Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rachel
A. Haines, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:


(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




The
foregoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability
under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act
except to the extent this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.


Date:
      November 14, 2008
            /s/
      Rachel A. HainesName:
            Rachel
      A. HainesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

NANCY CUSSON,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:11-CV-86-SPM/GRJ

NEWBERRY SC COMPANY LTD.,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Plaintiff’s Third Unopposed

Motion for Extension of Time to Respond (doc. 20) to Defendant’s Motion for More

Definite Statement (doc. 12). The Court finds this request to be reasonable.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motion (doc. 20) is granted.

2. The Plaintiff shall have until August 1, 2011, to respond to the

Motion for More Definite Statement.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-ninth day of July, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00086-SPM-GRJ Document 22 Filed 07/29/11 Page 1 of 1
Pantex Plant

Special Exposure Cohort -

Bounding Uranium Intakes

Mark R. Rolfes, M.S.

Health Physicist

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Division of Compensation Analysis and Support

August 2011

Richland, WA
Pantex Plant Mission

 Develop and fabricate high explosives

 Assemble finished parts into nuclear weapons

 Conduct surveillance testing and evaluation

 Retrofits and modifications

 Dismantlement of retired weapons
Uranium Exposure Potential

 Assembly operations involve handling of clean, 

new depleted uranium components

• Memorandum to Y-12 dated 1959 explicitly pronounced Pantex’s “Commitment to allow no 

detectable removable contamination into the weapon 

assembly area.”

 Potential for internal exposure from the handling 

of new uranium parts is low

• Review of >5,000 Pantex workplace air monitoring 

results (1960s-1990s), >200,000 contamination swipes (1980s – 2010), and source term information (all years) all support the low exposure potential 
Uranium Exposure Potential–cont.

 Higher potential for intake during dismantlement 

• Early Pantex operations focused on assembly 

• Majority of dismantlement work occurred after 1973

 W28 dismantlement operations from 1984-1989 

had the highest potential for uranium internal 

exposure

• Supported by observed contamination levels, 

documented interviews, and site expert discussions
Reasons Why the W-28 Campaign 

Bounds Uranium Intakes

 W28 series weapons were stockpiled up to 30 years 

which maximized the potential for age related oxidation

• Corrosion of uranium is a function of composition, age, 

temperature, and humidity

 Depleted uranium metal in the W28 was not alloyed or 

encased (alloying of uranium inhibits corrosion)

 W28 had one of the largest uranium surface areas of all 

weapons, hence more metal was exposed to corrosive 

environments 

 Disassembly operations far exceeded those conducted in 

previous years
Bounding Uranium Intakes-cont.

 Approximately 300 uranium urinalyses collected 

from weapon assembly and disassembly workers 

at Pantex shortly after the campaign ended

• Samples can be used to bound the maximum chronic 

intakes that could have occurred over the 6-year 

period

 The 95th percentile uranium intake value of the 

distribution of measured urine samples bounds 

potential intakes for all assembly and 

disassembly operations at Pantex 
Uranium Intake Plausibility

 The uranium intakes proposed by NIOSH are 

bounding under plausible circumstances

• For type S material this results in a daily intake of 135 

pCi (~30 U dpm/m3)

 In Vivo results from the worker population supports that the chronic 95th percentile uranium intakes proposed by NIOSH are bounding

 NIOSH airborne levels are consistent with 

empirically derived values from similar 

operations involving uranium
Summary

 NIOSH has developed a scientific, quantitative 

methodology to bound potential uranium intakes 

incurred by Pantex assembly and disassembly 

workers
JAMIE MINOR

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 0867

______________ ___________/

Opinion filed July 5, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Russell L. Healey , Judge

.

Jamie Minor, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. T HOMAS, C.J., OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jackson Y. Dott, certify that:


1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Monarch Services,
    Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
        material information relating to the registrant, including its
        consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
        those entities, particularly during the period in which this
        quarterly report is being prepared;

    b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
        and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
        effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
        end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
        and

    c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
        most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
        the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
        reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

    a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
        or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
        are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information.

    b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting.



/s/    JACKSON Y. DOTT

Jackson Y. Dott
Chief Executive Officer
Date:  December 12, 2003
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5781 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to ensure that certain educational benefits administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs are 

treated as income by landlords evaluating the ability of a servicemember, 

veteran, or a spouse or child of a servicemember or veteran, to pay 

rent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2018 

Mr. CROWLEY (for himself, Mr. BANKS of Indiana, Mr. MEEKS, and Mr. 

ESPAILLAT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act to ensure 

that certain educational benefits administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs are treated as income by landlords evaluating the ability of a servicemember, veteran, 

or a spouse or child of a servicemember or veteran, 

to pay rent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5781 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Students Living Irre3 spective of Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2018’’ 

4 or the ‘‘Students LIVE Act of 2018’’. 

5 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF VET6 ERANS AFFAIRS BENEFITS IN DETERMINING 

7 INCOME FOR PURPOSES OF ENTERING INTO 

8 RESIDENTIAL LEASES. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Servicemembers 

10 Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3951 et seq.) is amended by 

11 adding at the end the following new section: 

12 ‘‘SEC. 309. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF VET13 ERANS AFFAIRS BENEFITS IN DETERMINING 

14 INCOME FOR PURPOSES OF ENTERING INTO 

15 RESIDENTIAL LEASES. 

16 ‘‘(a) PROTECTION.—In determining whether a cov17 ered individual has an income sufficient to enter into a 

18 lease of premises for a residential purpose, the landlord 

19 (or other person with paramount title) of the premises 

20 shall treat any benefits received by the covered individual 

21 under any of chapters 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, or 36 of 

22 title 38, United States Code, or chapters 1606 or 1607 

23 of title 10, United States Code, as income. 

24 ‘‘(b) MISDEMEANOR.—A person who knowingly takes 

25 an action contrary to this section, or attempts to do so, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5781 IH

1 shall be fined as provided in title 18, United States Code, 

2 or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both. 

3 ‘‘(c) COVERED INDIVIDUAL DEFINED.—In this sec4 tion, the term ‘covered individual’ means a servicemember, 

5 veteran, or a spouse or child of a servicemember or vet6 eran.’’. 

7 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

8 at the beginning of such Act is amended by inserting after 

9 the item relating to section 308 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 309. Treatment of certain Department of Veterans Affairs benefits in determining income for purposes of entering into residential 

leases.’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 126 

Crowne Plaza 

300 North Harbor Drive, Redondo Beach California 90272 

(310) 318-8888; Fax: (310) 376-1930

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537, Participant Code: 9933701# 

Skype Link: https://webconf.cdc.gov/zab6/yzdq02pl?sl=1 

Wednesday, December 12, 2018 

NOTE: All times in Pacific Time 

8:30 a.m. – 8:45 a.m. Welcome (POTUS designate), Chair 

8:45 a.m. – 8:55 a.m. NIOSH Program Update Mr. Stuart Hinnefeld, NIOSH 

8:55 a.m. – 9:05 a.m. DOL Program Update Mr. Frank (Chris) Crawford, 

DOL 

9:05 a.m. –9:15 a.m. DOE Program Update Dr. Patricia Worthington, DOE 

Mr. Greg Lewis, DOE 

9:15 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. Carborundum Company 

(Niagara Falls, NY) Site 

Profile Review (PV) 

Dr. Genevieve Roessler, WG 

Chair 

10:15 a.m. – 10:30 a.m. Break 

10:30 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Y-12 Plant SEC Petition (Oak

Ridge Tennessee; 1958-1976;

83.14) (PV)

Dr. Lara Hughes, NIOSH 

Petitioner: 

12:00 p.m. – 1:30 p.m. Lunch 

1:30 p.m. – 1:45 p.m. SEC Petitions Status Update Mr. LaVon Rutherford, 

NIOSH 

1: 45 p.m. – 2:45 p.m. Board Work Session 

- Scheduling meetings

Location for April. 17-18:

Tele: week of October 14

Meet: week of December 9

- WG/SC reports

- August public comments

(POTUS Designate), Chair 

1 
 

 

 

 

 

8:15 a.m. – 8:30 a.m. Welcome and Introduction (POTUS designate), Chair 

8:30 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. Superior Steel Company SEC 

Petition #247 (Carnegie 

Pennsylvania; 1952-1957) 

Dr. Megan Lobaugh, NIOSH 

Petitioner: 

10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. Break 

10:15 a.m. – 11:45 a.m. Metals and Controls Corp. 

SEC Petition #236 (Attleboro 

MA, 1968-1997) 

Ms. Josie Beach, WG Chair 

John Mauro, SC&A 

Petitioners: 

11:45 a.m. – 1:15 p.m. Lunch 

1:15 p.m. – 2:30 p.m. Los Alamos National 

Laboratory SEC Petition #109 

(Los Alamos, New Mexico 

1996-2005) 

Ms. Josie Beach, WG Chair 

Mr. Lavon Rutherford, NIOSH 

Mr. Joe Fitzgerald, SC&A 

Petitioner: 

2:30 p.m. Adjourn 

2:45 p.m. – 3:45 p.m. Area IV Santa Susanna Field 

Laboratory SEC Petition #235 

(Ventura County, CA; 1991-

1993) 

Dr. Lara Hughes, NIOSH 

Mr. Philip Schofield, WG 

Chair 

Petitioner: 

3:45 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Break 

4:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. DeSoto Avenue Facility SEC 

Petition #246 (Los Angeles 

County, CA; 1965-1995) 

Mr. Philip Schofield, WG 

Chair 

Mr. John Stiver, SC&A 

Petitioner: 

5:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m.* Public Comment 

Adjourn 

* Public comment period will conclude at 6:00 p.m. or following the final call for public comment, 

whichever comes first. If you plan to comment, please be prepared to comment at 5:00 p.m. 

Thursday, December 13, 2018 

NOTE: All times in Pacific Time 

2
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Program Update

Grady Calhoun, CHP

Director

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health, 130th Meeting

Oak Ridge, TN | August 21, 2019
Contracts, staffing

 Dose Reconstruction (DR) contract awarded to Oak Ridge Associated 

University Team (1-year base, 4 option years)

 Worker outreach contract awarded soon

 Backfilling 3 positions due to retirements
Workshops, Town Halls and Outreach activities

Since April 2019

 Department of Labor (DOL) ombudsman outreach for Fernald workers 

Cincinnati, OH and Columbus, OH in June 

 Workshop for authorized representatives in Las Vegas, NV

 Town Hall April in Oak Ridge, TN for Y-12 workers

Upcoming outreach, workshop

 NIOSH to attend September 5 DOL outreach – Bolingbrook, IL (Argonne 

National Laboratory- East)

 Dose reconstruction workshop in Cincinnati, OH in September
Case status report (current as of August 14, 2019)

 51,048 cases to NIOSH from DOL with 48,491 returned to DOL

– 1,070 at NIOSH for DR

– 901 administratively closed

 49,077 submitted with DR to DOL

– 1,605 pulled from DR by DOL

– 3,523 pulled for Special Exposure Cohort (SEC)
Records to Department of Energy

 146 outstanding

 3 more than 60 days
Probability of Causation Summary

 43,949 DRs sent for final adjudication

– 12,074 greater than 50 percent

– 31,875 less than 50 percent
Active Cases

 1,070 active at NIOSH for DR

– 330 in the DR process

– 207 initial draft DR reports with claimants

– 533 cases preparing for DR