alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5636 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 772
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5636

                          [Report No. 115-989]

   To designate additions to the Flatside Wilderness on the Ouachita 
                National Forest, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2018

  Mr. Hill (for himself and Mr. Beyer) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

                            October 23, 2018

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
 [Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed 
                               in italic]
 [For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on April 
                               26, 2018]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate additions to the Flatside Wilderness on the Ouachita 
                National Forest, and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flatside Wilderness Enhancement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO FLATSIDE WILDERNESS.

    Section 3(d) of Arkansas Wilderness Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-508; 
98 Stat. 2349) is amended by inserting ``and certain land in the 
Ouachita National Forest, which comprise approximately 640 acres, as 
generally depicted as `Recommended Wilderness Area' on the map titled 
`Flatside Wilderness, Recommended Wilderness Area', dated September 6, 
2018'' after ``1984''.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS ADDITION.

    The wilderness addition created under section 2 shall be known as 
the Bethune Woods-Flatside Wilderness. Any reference in a law, map, 
regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United States to 
such portion of the Flatside Wilderness shall be deemed to be a 
reference to the Bethune Woods-Flatside Wilderness.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 772

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5636

                          [Report No. 115-989]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To designate additions to the Flatside Wilderness on the Ouachita 
                National Forest, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 23, 2018

  Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 
       House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed
```
## I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-40937 Summary Calendar
MELVIN C. KEEL, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant v. WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:11-CV-248
Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### The judgment of the district cou r t i s affirmed for the reason, as the magistrate j u d g e has explained in careful detail, the plaintiff has failed to present evidence to raise a fact issue to support his complaints. The plaintiff has
not p o inted to any legal error in the ruling of the magistrate judge or judgment of the district judge. AFFIRMED. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D October 15, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5, the court has determ ined that this op inion s hould not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. 

### Case: 12-40937 Document: 00512406923 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/15/2013
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 7, 2021

No. 04-21-00412-CR

EX PARTE KEVIN OWENS,

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-CR-1906

Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due on December 6, 2021. Before the due date, Appellant filed a 

motion for an extension of time to file the brief.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on January 5, 2022.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of December, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
|                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                        |  |  |  |  |
| (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
| Delaware                                               |   | 1-3863 |   | 34-0276860 |
| (State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation)          |   | (Commission File Number) |   | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |

|                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                    |  |  |  |  |
| 1025 West NASA Blvd., Melbourne, Florida                           |   | 329l9 |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                           |   | (Zip Code) |
|                                                               |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (321) 727-9l00 |
|                                                               |
|                                                               | No change |   |
|                                                               | (Former name or former address, if changed since last report) |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |

----

----

|      |
|------|
|      |  |  |
| 99.1 |   | Press Release, issued by Harris Corporation on February 2, 2017 (furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 and Item 7.01). |

----

|                        |
|------------------------|
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                   |   |   |   | HARRIS CORPORATION |
|                   |   |   |   |
|                   |   |   |   | By: |   | /s/ Rahul Ghai |
|                   |   |   |   | Name: |   | Rahul Ghai |
|                   |   |   |   | Title: |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| Date: February 2, 2017 |   |   |   |   |   |   |

----

|                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |  |  |
| Exhibit No.Under Reg. S-K,Item 601 |    | Description |
|                                              |   |   |
| 99.1                                              |    | Press Release, issued by Harris Corporation on February 2, 2017 (furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 and Item 7.01). |
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 31 01

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ LaRo nd a Ph ox
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Geo rg e E. Fern Co ., an Oh io co rp or at io n; Int ern at io na l Al li an ce o f The at ric al St at e Em pl oyees, Lo cal 31

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i - Kan sa s C it y

__ __ __ __ __ __ Su bm it te d: May 1, 20 13 Fil ed : M ay

6, 2 01 3 [Un pu bl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.LaRo nd a Ph ox se ek s to ap pe al va rio us or de rs en te red by th e di st ric t co ur t th at 1
gr an te d su m

m ary jud gm en t to de fen da nt In t e r n at io na l All ia nc e of The at ric al St ag e Em pl oyees Loc al 31 , de ni ed he r m ot io ns fo r a de fau lt jud gm en t ag ai ns t de f e n d a n t Geo rg e E. Fern Co

. (GFC), an d de ni ed di sc ov ery m ot io ns an d he r m ot io ns to am en d he r co m pl ai nt

.

W e co nc lu de th is co ur t la ck s juri sd ic ti on o v e r t h is ap pe al , be cau se Ph ox ’s cl ai m s ag ai ns t de fen da nt GFC rem ai n p en di ng be fo re t he di st ric t co ur t. Thu s th ere is no fin al jud gm en t for us to rev ie w. See 28 U.S.C. § 12 91 (co ur ts of ap pe al s sh al l ha ve juri sd ic ti on ov er ap pe a l s f r o m al l fin al de ci si on s an d sp eci fie d in te rlo cu to ry
or de rs ); Tho m as v. Bas ha m , 93 1 F.2 d 52 1, 52 3 (8 th Ci r. 19 91 ) (juri sd ic ti on al is su es
are rai se d su a sp on te ; or de r di sm is si ng fewer th an al l cl ai m s in pe nd in g act io n is no t fin al ap pe al ab le or de r un de r § 12 91 ); se e al so Ten kk u v. Nor m an dy Ban k, 21 8 F.3 d 92 6, 92 7 (8 th Ci r. 20 00 ) (“ [p ]retri al di sc ov ery or de rs are no t im m ed ia te ly ap pe al ab le ”); Bea n v. Dor m ire , 10 F.3 d 53 8, 53 9 (8 th Ci r. 1 9 93 ) (d is tri ct co ur t’s de ni al of de fau lt jud gm en t is no t fin al ap pe al ab le o r de r); ; Lid de ll v. Bd

. of Edu c., 69 3 F.2 d 72 1, 72 6 (8 th Ci r. 19 81 ) (o rd er) (s am e fo r de ni al of m ot io n to am en d)

. W e th eref or e di sm is s th e ap pe al fo r la ck of juri sd ic ti on

. W e de ny as m oo t Ph ox ’s pe nd in g m ot io ns

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le Dean W hi pp le , Un it ed St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e We s t e r n 1 Dis tri ct of M is so ur i.
-2

-
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 17th day of September 2014, by and between UNILIFE CORPORATION (“Unilife”) and Ramin Mojdehbakhsh, Ph.D. (“Mojdeh”). 

WHEREAS, Unilife and Mojdeh have entered into an employment agreement, dated as of July 1, 2012 (the
“Agreement”), as amended by agreements dated September 12, 2013 and September 15, 2014, in connection with Mojdeh’s employment by Unilife; and 

WHEREAS, Unilife and Mojdeh desire to amend certain provisions of the Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and covenants set forth herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties
agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The first sentence of Section 2(a) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following. Other than this first sentence of Section 2(a), Section 2(a) shall remain unchanged:


 “Unilife will employ Mojdeh as President and Chief Operating Officer and Mojdeh agrees to serve in such
capacity for Unilife with responsibility for Unilife’s operating functions and such other duties as are assigned to him by the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of Unilife, and shall have vested in him the authority and duties typically
held by an employee in such position.” 
  

	 	2.	The first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following. Other than this second sentence of Section 3(a), Section 3(a) shall remain unchanged:


 “Mojdeh shall be paid an annual base salary of Four Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars ($420,000) payable in accordance
with Unilife’s standard payroll practices.” 
  

	 	3.	The second sentence of Section 3(b) of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following. Other than this second sentence of Section 3(b), Section 3(b) shall remain unchanged:


 “Mojdeh’s annual target cash bonus shall be Eighty percent (80%) of his base salary.” 

 

	 	4.	Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. All other provisions of the Agreement not amended by this Amendment shall continue in full force and effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above. 

 

							
	UNILIFE CORPORATION:	 		 	Ramin Mojdehbakhsh, Ph.D.:
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Alan D. Shortall
	 		 	 /s/ Ramin Mojdehbakhsh

		 	Alan D. Shortall	 		 	
		 	Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cr-23-RS-GRJ

FRANK EBEN GULLETT, JR.,

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant filed a motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2255 on February 28,

2012. Doc. 496. On March 5, 2012, the Court ordered Defendant to file an amended

motion on or before April 6, 2011. Defendant was warned that failure to comply would

result in a recommendation that his pending motion to vacate be denied. Doc. 497. 

Defendant did not file an amended motion. On April 11, 2012, the Court ordered

Defendant to show cause on or before April 25, 2012, as to why his motion to vacate

should not be denied for failure to comply with an Order of the Court. Defendant was

warned that if he failed to respond, any subsequently-filed motion to vacate may be

barred by the one-year limitations period. See 28 U.S.C § 2255(f). Doc. 514. As of

the date of this Order, Defendant has neither responded to the show cause order nor

filed an amended motion to vacate.1

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the pending motion to

On April 12, 2012, the Clerk docketed a letter from Defendant addressed to the 1

district judge, seeking relief from his sentence. This letter is dated March 31, 2012,

prior to issuance of the show cause order, and therefore is not construed as a response

to the show cause order. Doc. 515.

Case 5:11-cr-00023-MW-GRJ Document 520 Filed 04/30/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

vacate, Doc. 496, be denied without prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the

court, and that the accompanying civil case be closed.

IN CHAMBERS this 30 day of April 2012.

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within

14 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to another

party’s objections within 14 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections

limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No: 5:11-cr-23-RS-GRJ

Case 5:11-cr-00023-MW-GRJ Document 520 Filed 04/30/12 Page 2 of 2
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Bar Group Inc., (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ulrik Gerdes, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: May 20, 2010

| | /s/
      Ulrik Gerdes       
| | -----------------------------
| | Ulrik Gerdes                 
| | Chief Financial Officer      
| | (Principal Financial Officer)

---
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated November 24, 2015, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-207087) of Smart Trust,
Zacks Diversified Equity & Corporate Bond Trust, Series 10.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


November 24, 2015
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:01cr91-02/RV

LEROY ALEXANDER MINOTT 

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on February 19, 2009

Motion/Pleadings: Motion to Dismiss Indictment 

Filed by United States on 2/18/2009 Doc.# 63

RESPONSES:

 on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 19th day of

February, 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is GRANTED, without prejudice.

(b) 

/s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:01-cr-00091-RV Document 64 Filed 02/20/09 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard Porterfield, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Precision Petroleum
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)  presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

Date:  May 19, 2010

By:  /s/ Richard Porterfield
     ------------------------------------------
         Richard Porterfield
         President, Chief Executive Officer and
         principal executive officer

<PAGE>
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 17, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00241-CV 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant 

V. 

ENERGY TRANSFER FUEL, LP, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 006-00600-2016 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

We reinstate this appeal. The appeal was abated pending the Court’s determination of the 

State of Texas’s mandamus petition concerning the same subject matter of this appeal. By opinion 

dated November 14, 2018, we conditionally granted mandamus relief and concluded this appeal 

was moot. See In re State of Tex., No. 05-18-00685-CV, 2018 WL 5961734 *3, 4 (Tex. App.—

Dallas Nov. 14, 2018, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Because we do not have jurisdiction over 

moot controversies, we dismiss the appeal. See 42.3(a)(1); Matthews v. Kountze Indep. Sch. Dist., 

484 S.W.3d 416, 418 (Tex. 2016). 

180241F.P05 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant 

No. 05-18-00241-CV V. 

ENERGY TRANSFER FUEL, LP, 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 6, Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 006-00600-2016. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Evans and Brown participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 We ORDER appellee Energy Transfer Fuel, LP recover its costs, if any, of this appeal 

from appellant the State of Texas. 

Judgment entered December 17, 2018.