alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

20521 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 73 

Tuesday, April 15, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8237 of April 11, 2008 

National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During National Crime Victims’ Rights Week we highlight our dedication 

to protecting and strengthening the rights of crime victims and their families. 

My Administration is committed to providing services and resources for 

victims of crime so that they can find justice, hope, and healing in their 

lives. To assist victims of domestic violence and their children, my Family 

Justice Center Initiative established comprehensive support centers in communities across the country. Through the Justice for All Act of 2004, we 

expanded DNA testing and enhanced the scope and enforceability of crime 

victims’ rights. In 2006, I signed into law the Adam Walsh Child Protection 

and Safety Act to expand the National Sex Offender Registry, increase Federal 

penalties for crimes against children, and protect our children while on 

the Internet. I also support a Crime Victims’ Rights Amendment to the 

Constitution. Through these and other efforts, we can better protect our 

citizens and our communities. 

During National Crime Victims’ Rights Week, we recognize the advocates, 

counselors, and others who assist victims in their time of need, and the 

law enforcement personnel who work to bring offenders to justice. To learn 

more about victims’ rights, Americans can visit www.crimevictims.gov. By 

working together, we can help protect crime victims and build a society 

that respects the life and value of every person. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 13 through April 

19, 2008, as National Crime Victims’ Rights Week. I encourage all Americans 

to promote 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PRESDOC

20522 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 73 / Tuesday, April 15, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eleventh day 

of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 08–1137 

Filed 4–14–08; 8:52 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PRESDOCGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:11-cr-21-SPM/WCS

HAYWARD LAMAR GRIFFIN,

 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation (doc. 42) of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of

the Defendant, HAYWARD LAMAR GRIFFIN, to Counts Four, Five, and Six of the

Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. The plea agreement is REJECTED as to Count One.

All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this thirteenth day of May, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

LORRAINE L. DAVIS, EXECUTRIX OF 

THE ESTATE OF: JOHN J. HUDSON, 

DECEASED

v.

HCR MANORCARE, LLC; MANOR CARE 

OF LANCASTER PA, LLC D/B/A 

MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES -

LANCASTER; MANORCARE HEALTH 

SERVICES, INC. A/K/A MANORCARE 

HEALTH SERVICES, LLC; MANOR 

CARE, INC.; HCR MANORCARE, INC.; 

HCR IV HEALTHCARE, LLC.; HCR III 

HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCR II 

HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCR 

HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCRMC 

OPERATIONS, LLC; HEARTLAND 

EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLC; THE 

LANCASTER GENERAL HOSPITAL AND 

LANCASTER GENERAL HEALTH

PETITION OF: HCR MANORCARE, LLC; 

MANOR CARE OF LANCASTER PA, LLC 

D/B/A MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES 

- LANCASTER; MANORCARE HEALTH 

SERVICES, INC. A/K/A MANORCARE 

HEALTH SERVICES, LLC; MANOR 

CARE, INC.; HCR MANORCARE, INC.; 

HCR IV HEALTHCARE, LLC.; HCR III 

HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCR II 

HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCR 

HEALTHCARE, LLC; HCRMC 

OPERATIONS, LLC; HEARTLAND 

EMPLOYMENT SERVICES, LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 210 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Unpublished Judgment Order and 

Order of the Superior Court at No. 507 

MDA 2015 entered on February 23, 

2016, affirming the Order Entered of 

the Lancaster County Court of Common 

Pleas at No. CI-14-06658 entered on 

February 25, 2015

ORDER
[210 MAL 2016] - 2 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 15th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and this matter is 

REMANDED to the Superior Court for further proceedings in light of Taylor v. 

Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc., et al., ___ A.3d ___, 2016 WL 5630669 (Pa. filed 

Sept. 28, 2016). 

DECIDED: November 15, 2016
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of ecoSolutions Intl (the “Company”) hereby
certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:




(i)
  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and




(ii)
  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
      May 14, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/
      Jane EmkesJane
      Emkes
                      Chief
      Financial
Officer
exhibit101.htm





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





A - 1











  






 





 




  





A - 2











  






 





 




  





A - 3











  






 





 




  





A - 4











  






 





 




  





B - 1
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the

Subcommittee on Dose Reconstruction Review

February 6, 2014

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

10:00 a.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll-call

DISCUSSION

Progress report on NIOSH and SC&A Blind Reviews

DR method for Westinghouse Nuclear Fuels

Case Reviews Issue Resolution

• Set 9

• Sets 10-13, remaining cases

Plans for completing review of Sets 10-13

Summarizing review results for Board report

Selection criteria for new DR case reviews (Set 19)

4:30 p.m. Adjourn
Exhibit 23

          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our reports dated March 13, 2000 included
in this Form 10-K, into Enron Corp.'s previously filed
Registration Statement File Nos. 33-13397 (Savings Plan), 33-
34796 (Savings Plan), 33-52261 (Savings Plan), 33-27893
(1988 Stock Option Plan), 33-52768 (1991 Stock Plan), 33-
60821 (1994 Stock Plan), 333-70465 (Debt Securities, Common
Stock, Preferred Stock and Depositary Shares), 333-48193
(1994 Deferral Plan), 333-75703 (3,825,921 Shares of Common
Stock), 333-82225 (1994 Stock Plan), 333-85001 (1994 Stock
Plan), 333-82227 (1991 Stock Plan) and 333-84999 (1991 Stock
Plan).




ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP





Houston, Texas
March 28, 2000
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00277

- CR

Antonio Colin a/k/a Antonio Miguel Caballero v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 226th District Court of Bexar County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017

- CR

- 12855

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF A PPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 4, 2021
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WILLIAM NORKUNAS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00064-MP-GRJ

THIRTY-NINTH AVENUE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 42, a notice of settlement submitted by the

parties. In the notice, the parties indicate that a settlement has been reached as to all claims and

that the parties wish the case to be dismissed with prejudice and with each side to bear its costs

and attorney’s fees except as set out in the settlement. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice and this case is

closed. 

2. The Court will retain jurisdiction for 60 days, however, to ensure that

settlement is effected.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00064-MP-GRJ Document 43 Filed 10/03/11 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5546 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5546

    To authorize the use of certain Department of Defense funds for 
      combating opioid trafficking and abuse in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2018

  Mr. Knight introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the use of certain Department of Defense funds for 
      combating opioid trafficking and abuse in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) Over the past 15 years, the rise in opioid use in the 
        United States has grown exponentially.
            (2) According to the Office of National Drug Control 
        Policy, the number of deaths related to opioids in the United 
        States in 2016 was 42,269.
            (3) Addiction and misuse of prescription opioids continues 
        to rise. According to the Office of National Drug Control 
        Policy, in 2016, 11.5 million people misused prescription 
        opioids.
            (4) The predominant amount of precursors for fentanyl 
        production are illicit trafficked from China.
            (5) The Office of National Drug Control Policy is the lead 
        agency for confronting the epidemic of opioid addiction and 
        trafficking in the United States.
            (6) The Department of Homeland Security is the lead agency 
        in securing United States borders from illicit trafficking.
            (7) The Department of Defense plays a vital supporting role 
        in addressing the illicit nature of the opioid epidemic through 
        intelligence analysis, education, and assistance to other 
        departments and agencies in dealing with this challenge.
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) the Department of Defense should provide support for 
        interagency efforts to combat the national opioid epidemic; and
            (2) the role of the Department of Defense is critical to 
        identifying transnational criminal organizations that allow 
        illicit opioids to enter the United States.

SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SUPPORT FOR COMBATING OPIOID TRAFFICKING 
              AND ABUSE.

    Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for the Department of 
Defense for National Guard counterdrug programs for fiscal year 2019, 
$20,000,000 may be used to provide support for United States 
interagency efforts to combat opioid trafficking and abuse in the 
United States.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 13 (Friday, January 18, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 3455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-190]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, February 1, 2008.

Place:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status:  Closed.

Matters To Be Considered:  Surveillance matters.

Contact Person for More Information:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 08-190 Filed 1-16-08; 10:06 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00456-CV

Carrie Scruggs

v.

Rockport Terminals, LLC

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas

Trial Cause No. A-19-0171-CV-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are taxed against the 

party incurring same. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 1, 2020
1 The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-3738

___________ Dwight F. Johnson, Sr., * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Schnucks Markets, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: July 2, 2003 Filed: July 9, 2003

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Dwight F. Johnson appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in his action alleging his employer violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions on appeal, we conclude the district court’s decision was correct for the reasons stated therein. We do not address the claims Johnson raises for the first time on appeal. See Spear v. Dayton’s , 771 F.2d 1140, 1144 (8th Cir. 1985) (refusing to consider claim not presented to district court).-2- Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
RALPHAEL R. CALDWELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-4038

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 22, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Ross Goodman, Judge.

Ralphael R. Caldwell, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 27, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 30382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1291]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Wednesday, June 11, 2008.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Risk Surveillance.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 08-1291 Filed 5-22-08; 11:35 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-60441 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY LEROY RUSSELL, also known as Tony Wilson, also

known as Stone Russell, also known as Anthony Russell,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:99-CR-119-ALL-LS

--------------------

March 9, 2001

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Anthony Leroy Russell appeals from his guilty-plea

conviction, for being a convicted felon in possession of a

firearm, and sentence, which was enhanced under the Armed Career

Criminal Act of 1984 (ACCA). See 18 U.S.C. §§ 921(g), 924(e).

Russell argues that the district court erred by enhancing

his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) because one of the

three required prior convictions is constitutionally infirm. He

asserts that the evidence supporting his prior conviction for
No. 00-60441

-2-

possession with the intent to distribute cocaine is sufficient to

support only a conviction for simple possession of cocaine. With

the exception of a claim concerning a conviction obtained in

violation of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, see Gideon v.

Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), a defendant subject to a 

18 U.S.C. § 924(e) sentence cannot challenge at the federal

sentencing hearing the validity of the prior convictions upon

which the 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) sentence rests. United States v.

Custis, 511 U.S. 484, 493-96 (1994).

Russell’s reliance on United States v. Clark, 203 F.3d 358,

363 (5th Cir. 2000), petition for cert. filed, (July 21, 2000)

(No. 00-122), is misplaced. Clark was an appeal from the

dismissal of a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. 203 F.3d at 362. This

court held that a defendant “who wishes to challenge a federal

sentence that has been enhanced under the ACCA by allegedly

unconstitutional prior state convictions, for which the prisoner

is no longer ‘in custody,’ may do so through a section 2255

motion.” Pack v. Yusuff, 218 F.3d 448, 454 (5th Cir. 2000)

(footnote omitted) (stating the holding of Clark). Collateral

relief from the prior Mississippi conviction is unavailable to

Russell on direct appeal from his federal conviction and

sentence. See Clark, 203 F.3d at 365-67 (interpreting Custis).

We express no opinion on the appropriate disposition if

Russell seeks relief through a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.

AFFIRMED.
RODERICK CLARK

,

Petitioner,

v.

NICHOLS M. N. P.

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1682

Opinion filed September 5, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Roderick Clark, pro se , Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has not demonstrated that the trial court has failed to timely consider

and rule upon any motion after having that matter called up for hearing and disposition.

Petitioner has therefore failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. SeeMoore v. Corr. Med. Servs. , 817 So. 2d 963, 964 (F la. 1st DCA 2002) (“Absent a

showing that the trial court has failed to take action on some pending matter he has

noticed for hearing, [the petitioner] has failed to establish an en titlement to mandamus

relief.”); Smartt v. First Union Nat’l Bank , 771 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). We

DENY the petition accordingly.

LEWIS, RAY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
#### Everett Summers *and*Lula Summers *v.*Maggie Summers Brown *and*Robert Brown

(No. 13742)

Decided July 15, 1977.

*J. M. Tully*for appellants.

*James H. Wolverton*for appellees.

Per Curiam:

Plaintiffs sought to eject Maggie Summers Brown from property which she alleged she had occupied for fourteen years and upon which, with plaintiffs’ acquiescence, she had constructed a $12,000 house. Maggie Summers Brown’s answer raised the issue of whether *680plaintiffs, by their acquiescence, were estopped under the rule in *Despard v. Despard,*53 W. Va. 443, 43 S.E. 448 (1903), from asserting their right to possession of the property.

Summary judgement cannot be granted in a case where a genuine issue of material fact is raised. *Oakes v. Monongahela Power*Co., _ W. Va. _, 207 S.E.2d 191 (1974). Since the question of whether or not plaintiffs were estopped was material to their right of recovery, and since Maggie Summers Brown raised questions of fact, which if proved, could possibly establish estoppel, the trial court erred in awarding summary judgment for plaintiffs and in denying Maggie Summers Brown an opportunity to introduce evidence on her allegations.

*Reversed and remanded.*
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-50557

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Raul Perez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:22-CR-557-1

______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Raul Perez was convicted of conspiring to transport illegal aliens in 

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 and sentenced to a 30-month prison term and 

three years of supervised release. On appeal, Perez argues that the district 

court erroneously applied an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6)

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 22, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-50557 Document: 63-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/22/2024
No. 23-50557

2

because the evidence did not establish that he created a substantial risk of 

death or serious bodily injury. 

Given the record as a whole, including the presentence report and 

addendum findings of fact, not rebutted with evidence by Perez at the 

sentencing hearing, see United States v. Alaniz, 726 F.3d 586, 619 (5th Cir. 

2013), the stipulation of facts offered in support of Perez’s plea, and the 

district court’s extensive inquiry and determination at sentencing concerning 

Perez’s speech, which we will not disturb, see United States v. Goncalves, 613 

F.3d 601, 609 (5th Cir. 2010), it was plausible for the district court to infer 

that Perez was driving while intoxicated, see United States v. Ramos-Delgado, 

763 F.3d 398, 400 (5th Cir. 2014). We cannot say on the facts of this case

that the court erred by imposing the enhancement. See United States v. RuizHernandez, 890 F.3d 202, 212 (5th Cir. 2018).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 23-50557 Document: 63-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/22/2024
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the 

Mound Work Group 

August 31, 2012 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537 

Participant Pass Code: 9933701 

1:30 p.m. Eastern Time 

 Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

 Tritides – NIOSH/SC&A 

 83.14 status update – NIOSH 

 Status update from NIOSH on site profile issues 

 WG recommendations 

Adjourn – 3:30pm