alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP, INC.



We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form
S-8 of FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP, INC. of our report dated April 24, 2002, of
FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP, INC. and subsidiaries, ("FIRSTFED") with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of FIRSTFED as of March 31, 2002 and 2001, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
March 31, 2002, which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended March 31, 2002.

                                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
June 20, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,086,118
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       52,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,793,541
<PP&E>                                             146,754
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,954,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,246,721
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            22,283
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,954,367
<SALES>                                          5,568,286
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,568,286
<CGS>                                            3,447,005
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,447,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,199,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (984,520)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         9,432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (993,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (993,952)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.65)
        


</TABLE>
|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|  ̈ |   | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|  ̈ |   | Confidential, For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|  ̈ |   | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| x      |   | Definitive Additional Materials |
|  ̈ |   | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
| x      |   | No fee required |
|   |   |   |
|  ̈ |   | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|   |   | 1) |   | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|   |   | 2) |   | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|   |   | 3) |   | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|   |   | 4) |   | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|   |   | 5) |   | Total fee paid: |
|   |   |   |   |   |
|  ̈ |   | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials: |
|   |   |   |
|  ̈ |   | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   | 1) |   | Amount Previously Paid: |
|   |   | 2) |   | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|   |   | 3) |   | Filing Party: |
|   |   | 4) |   | Date Filed: |

|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

----

----

----

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5475 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5475

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 108 North Macon Street in Bevier, Missouri, as the ``SO2 Navy SEAL 
                     Adam Olin Smith Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SO2 NAVY SEAL ADAM OLIN SMITH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 108 North Macon Street in Bevier, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``SO2 Navy SEAL Adam Olin Smith Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``SO2 Navy 
SEAL Adam Olin Smith Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5475

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 108 North Macon Street in Bevier, Missouri, as the ``SO2 Navy SEAL 
                     Adam Olin Smith Post Office''.
```
Order entered May 15 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00973
- CV RIGGS & RAY, P.C., Appellant

V. STATE FAIR OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Jud icial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 16
- 16070



### O RDER The Motion of State Fair of Texas to Order an Equal Division of the Rejoinder Time During May 14, 2019 Oral Argument is DENIED as moot

.
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL PRESIDING JUSTIC E
ACTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF





Exhibit 10.10










AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE
















The promissory note from Pocket Games to Elliott Polatoff date May 7, 2014 for the principal amount of $7,500 is amended as follows:




Sum due shall be amended to $9,500.00 (Nine Thousand Five Hundred Dollars) to reflect an additional $2,000 (Two Thousand Dollars) loan to the company on June 2, 2014.




Signed this 24th day of June 2014
















Borrower: Pocket Games, Inc.













Signature













David Lovatt, Pres.










David Lovatt

Printed Name















1
Exhibit 10.1

 

September 29, 2014

 

Dr. Charles Morris

16 William Beaser Drive

Garnet Valley, PA 19060

 

Dear Charlie:

 

In recognition of the financial hardship you are incurring in maintaining a second residence in Massachusetts as a result of having your primary place of employment at our Waltham, Massachusetts headquarters, the Compensation Committee has authorized the payment to you of a housing allowance to defray that cost for the next 18 months.

 

Subject to the terms and conditions of this letter, you will be entitled to receive a housing allowance in the aggregate amount of $125,000, payable in three equal installments as follows: the first installment will be paid in conjunction with our normal payroll cycle following your countersignature of this letter (the “Effective Date”); the next two installments will be paid in conjunction with our normal payroll cycle following the 182nd day after the Effective Date (the “First Installment End Date”) and the 364th day after the Effective Date (the “Second Installment End Date”).  Each payment is contingent on your being actively employed by ImmunoGen on the payment date, and is subject to reimbursement as described below.

 

If, within 18 months of the Effective Date, you terminate your employment with the Company (other than by reason of death or disability), or your employment is terminated by the Company for Cause (as such term is defined in the your Employment Agreement, if in effect; otherwise, as defined in the Severance Pay Plan for Vice Presidents and Higher), you will promptly reimburse ImmunoGen for a portion of most recent installment received equal to the product of (a) the amount of such installment, multiplied by (b) a fraction, (i) the numerator of which is 182 minus the number of days from (A) the Effective Date to the effective date of termination of your employment, in the case of the first installment, (B) the First Installment End Date to the effective date of termination of your employment, in the case of the second installment, and (C) the Second Installment End Date to the effective date of termination of your employment, in the case of the third installment, and (ii) the denominator of which is 182.

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Sincerely,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/   Daniel M. Junius
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Daniel   M. Junius
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
President   and Chief Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Acknowledged   and Agreed to:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Charles Q. Morris
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Charles   Q. Morris
    	
Date:   9/29/2014
363 S.E.2d 749

#### Sandra WITT v. CLENDENIN LUMBER and Ray Nicholes.

No. 17279.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Dec. 9, 1987.

Belinda S. Morton, Fayetteville, for plaintiff.

Charles E. Hurt, Charleston, for defendants. .

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff, Sandra Witt, appeals from a summary judgment of the Circuit Court of Fayette County entered on April 16, 1986, in favor of the defendant, Clendenin Lumber. The plaintiff asserts that there were sufficient disputed facts to avoid the summary judgment. The key issue is one of agency, and we affirm the summary judgment.

The gist of the plaintiff’s cause of action was that she had in June of 1983 noticed advertisements placed in the Charleston newspapers by Clendenin Lumber giving prices of Heil air conditioning units as installed by “professional Heil dealers.” Another advertisement identified mobile home air conditioning “installed by Ray Nicholes Heating and Air Conditioning Heil Dealer.” She alleged in her complaint that she contacted Ray Nicholes who, after checking her home, gave her an estimated price and then installed an air conditioning unit which she claimed came from Clendenin Lumber. After the unit was installed, she was informed by a local maintenance technician that the unit was not properly installed. She claimed that Clendenin was *673liable because its advertisement suggested Nicholes was its agent.

In its motion for summary judgment, Clendenin, through its president, filed an affidavit denying any agency with Ni-choles. The affidavit pointed out that Clendenin was an authorized distributor of Heil units and that Nicholes was simply one of several authorized dealers to whom it sold Heil units. It also noted that the complaint contained no allegation that Ni-choles represented, either expressly or impliedly, that he was an agent of Clendenin.

The plaintiff filed no counter affidavits, but took the position in her brief as she does here that the advertisements alone created an implied agency. We agree with the lower court that advertisements do not imply an agency relationship. In *Thompson v. Stuckey,*171 W.Va. 483, 487, 300 S.E.2d 295, 299 (1983), we addressed the concept of implied agency and indicated the acts must be “within the apparent authority that the principal has knowingly permitted the agent to assume. *General Elec. Credit Corp. v. Fields,*148 W.Va. 176, 133 S.E.2d 780 (1963).” Here the advertisements spoke only to installation by “professional Heil dealers.” There is nothing to suggest that they were Clendenin’s agents.

In the face of the affidavits of Clendenin and the failure of the plaintiff to file any counter affidavit to raise an issue of knowing permission, we find no genuine issue of material fact and apply the traditional test found in Syllabus Point 4 of *Aetna Cas. and Surety Co. v. Federal Ins. Co.,*148 W.Va. 160, 133 S.E.2d 770 (1963):

> “If there is no genuine issue as to any material fact summary judgment should be granted but such judgment must be denied if there is a genuine issue as to a material fact.”

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Fayette County is affirmed.

Affirmed.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2411

___________

Marie Grace Gordon, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Proctor & Gamble, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: October 7, 1998

 Filed: November 2, 1998

___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Marie Grace Gordon alleged that she fell at a PharMor pharmacy store after

liquid from a Dawn dishwashing detergent bottle, which had been placed upside down

in a grocery bag by a cashier, leaked onto the floor. Gordon brought a products

liability suit against Proctor & Gamble Distributing Company, the manufacturers of

Dawn dishwashing liquid. Gordon then sought to disqualify Proctor & Gamble&s

attorney because she practiced at the same firm as an attorney whom Gordon had

initially contacted about her suit, who had said at the outset that he could not take the
The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.

-2-

case. The district court granted Proctor & Gamble&s motion to dismiss under Federal 1

Rule Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and denied as moot Gordon&s motion to disqualify

Proctor & Gamble&s attorney. Gordon appeals.

Upon a review of the record and the parties& briefs, we conclude that the

dismissal of Gordon&s complaint was warranted. We also affirm the denial of Gordon&s

motion to disqualify Proctor & Gamble&s attorney.

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL ANTHONY CARTER,

Appellant,

v.

CANDACE DENISE MOORE

AND KEN PAXTON, ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 16

- 00014

- CV

Appeal from

353rd District Court

of Travis County, Texas

(TC # D

- 1

- FM

- 15

- 001246)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be

dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant, Michael Anthony Carter

, ha s failed

to file his brief or a motion for extension of time to file the brief, we dis miss the appeal for want

of prosecution.

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed on May 23 , 2016. When Appellant did not file his

brief, t he Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that his brief was past due and no motion for

extension of time had been fil ed. The letter advised Appellant that the Court intended to dismiss

the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellant responded within ten days and showed

grounds for continuing the appeal. See T EX .R.A PP .P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant has not filed any- 2

-

resp onse to the inquiry. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See

T EX .R.A PP .P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).

August 17, 2016

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rod riguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 15, 2022

No. 04-22-00071-CR

Eric Daniel AULD,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B16861

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due on May 12, 2022. After the due date, Appellant filed 

a first motion for a sixty-day extension of time to file the brief, which we granted. In doing so, 

we set the brief due on July 11, 2022, and we expressly cautioned Appellant that “any further 

motion for extension of time to file the brief may be disfavored.” 

On July 14, 2022, Appellant filed a second motion for a sixty-day extension of time to 

file the brief. 

Appellant’s motion is granted in part. Appellant’s brief is due on August 10, 2022. We 

strongly caution Appellant that any further motion for an extension of time to file the brief 

will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of July, 2022.

_________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The corporations listed below in bold type are the direct wholly owned
subsidiaries of the Registrant as of the date of this filing. Listed below
National American Corporation in regular type are its wholly owned subsidiaries.

         COAST FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

         LEISURE TIME RESORTS OF AMERICA, INC.

         NATIONAL AMERICAN CORPORATION
                  Beech Mountain Lakes Corporation
                  Carolina Landing Corporation
                  Carriage Manor Corporation
                  Cherokee Landing Corporation
                  Chief Creek Corporation
                  Dixie Resort Corporation
                  Foxwood Corporation
                  G.L. Land Development Corporation
                  Lake Royale Corporation
                  Lake Tansi Village, Inc.
                  LML Resort Corporation
                  Natchez Trace Wilderness Preserve Corporation
                  Quail Hollow Plantation Corporation
                  Quail Hollow Village, Inc.
                  Recreation Land Corporations
                  Recreation Properties, Inc.
                  Resort Land Corporation
                  Tansi Resort, Inc.
                  The Kinston Corporation
                  The Villas of Hickory Hills, Inc.
                  Western Fun Corporation
                  Wolf Run Corporation

         RESORT PARKS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

         THOUSAND TRAILS (CANADA), INC.

         THOUSAND TRAILS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.

         YUBA INVESTMENT COMPANY
----

----

| Principal Executive Officer        | Principal Financial Officer |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                               |                        |
| DAVIS SERIES, INC.                 | DAVIS SERIES, INC.          |
|                               |                        |
| /s/ Kenneth C. Eich                | /s/ Douglas A. Haines       |
|                               |                        |
| Kenneth C. Eich                    | Douglas A. Haines           |
| Principal Executive Officer        | Principal Financial Officer |
| Date:  February 28, 2014 | Date: February 28, 2014     |

----

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Legal Services Corporation

# Time and Date:

The Board of Directors of the Legal Services Corporation will meet on May 27, 2008 via conference call. The meeting will begin at 2 p.m. (EST), and continue until conclusion of the Board's agenda. 

# Location:

3333 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20007, 3rd Floor Conference Center. 

# Status of Meeting:

Open. Directors will participate by telephone conference in such a manner as to enable interested members of the public to hear and identify all persons participating in the meeting. Members of the public wishing to observe the meeting may do so by joining participating staff at the location indicated above. Members of the public wishing to listen to the meeting by telephone should call toll-free 1-877-319-7301 and enter 9368278 on the key pad when prompted. To enhance the quality of your listening experience as well as that of others and to eliminate background noises that interfere with the audio recording of the proceeding, please mute your telephone during the meeting. 

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Approval of the agenda. 

2. Consider and act on Board of Directors' response to the Inspector General's Semiannual Report to Congress for the period of October 1, 2007 through March 31, 2008. 

3. Consider and act on adoption of a resolution on the selection of a new 403(b) plan administrator for LSC. 

4. Public comment. 

5. Consider and act on other business. 

# Contact Person for Information:

Patricia Batie, Manager of Board Operations, at (202) 295-1500. 

# Special Needs:

Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend the meeting may notify Patricia Batie at (202) 295-1500. 

Dated: May 19, 2008. 

Victor M. Fortuno, 

Vice President & General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 08-1275 Filed 5-15-08; 1:00 pm] 

BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
Page 1 of 1

Miller, Diane M.

From: MARILYN LOVE,

Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 5:30 PM

To: NIOCINDOCKET@CDC.GOV:

Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT ON INTERIM FINAL RULE ON DOSE RECONSTRUCTION

TO Docket Officer:

My ‘comment on the interim final rule is that I feel people have different tolerances to radiation
exposure. Some may be able to tolerate a higher dose, and others may not be able to tolerate
that dose. They may develop cancer from whatever the exposure may be. A dose limit may be
fine for some but not for others. For example, I feel that if someone develops cancerous tumors
or leukemia from radiation exposure they should be compensated regardless of their exposure.

I urge you to compensate radiation workers who have developed cancer.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Marguerite and Marilyn Love

10/29/2001