alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powergae, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew Kovalenko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |     |  |                        
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Andrew Kovalenko   
|                   |  |     |  | Andrew Kovalenko       
|                   |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Tian Q Chen, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS I, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
that:





1.  The
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the
“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 20th
day of August, 2010.





/s/Tian Q
      ChenTian
      Q ChenChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
                Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS I, INC. and will be retained by ACCELERATED
ACQUISITIONS I, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) of ASA Holdings, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 1998, except
for the last paragraph of Note G, as to which the date is March 12, 1998,
included in the 1997 Annual Report to Shareholders of ASA Holdings, Inc.

         Our audit also included the financial statement schedules of ASA
Holdings, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). These schedules are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

         We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 2-94852-99) pertaining to the Atlantic Southeast
Airlines, Inc. Investment Savings Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-29503), pertaining to the ASA Holdings, Inc. 1997 Nonqualified Stock
Option Plan of our report dated January 30, 1998, except for the last paragraph
of Note G, as to which the date is March 12, 1998, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedules included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of ASA Holdings,
Inc.


                                           /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                                ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
March 30, 1998
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:11cr36/MCR

ROBERT THAYER

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, the plea of guilty of

the Defendant, ROBERT THAYER to Count I of the Superseding Indictment is hereby

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of May, 2012. 

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cr-00036-MCR Document 35 Filed 05/04/12 Page 1 of 1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

OSCAR SOLIS-JARAMILLO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-50603

D.C. No. 3:07-cr-01547-WQH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 21, 2015**

Before: CANBY, GOULD, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Oscar Solis-Jaramillo appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the seven-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised 

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Solis-Jaramillo contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to 

 

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 27 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 13-50603

respond to his sentencing arguments and by failing to explain adequately the

sentence and why it was imposed to run consecutively to the sentence imposed for 

Solis-Jaramillo’s new criminal conviction. We review for plain error, see United 

States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), and find none. The record 

reflects that the court considered Solis-Jaramillo’s arguments and sufficiently 

explained the sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 

2008) (en banc).

Solis-Jaramillo next contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable 

in light of his history and characteristics. The district court did not abuse its 

discretion in imposing Solis-Jaramillo’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 

U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 

U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including 

the need to afford adequate deterrence and to protect the public. See Gall, 552 U.S. 

at 51. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Anshu Bhatnagar, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that the Quarterly Report of Verus International, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended January 31, 2020 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Verus International, Inc.



Date:
May 22, 2020



| | By:    | /s/
    Anshu Bhatnagar                                  
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | Anshu Bhatnagar                                          
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
    Officer)
<PAGE>   1


                                                                 Exhibit 10.25

        SCHEDULE TO FORM OF NHP FIRST SERIES SHORTFALL FUNDING AGREEMENT
        FILED PURSUANT TO INSTRUCTION 2 TO ITEM 601(a) OF REGULATION S-K

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Facility                                                                                                   Collateral
Location                     Lessee                          Management Firm                               Account Deposits
--------                     ------                          ----------------                              ------------------ 
<S>                          <C>                             <C>                                            <C>
Akron, OH                    Elder Care Operators            Balanced Care at Akron, Inc.                   $110,000/$700,000
                             of Akron, LLC

Hilliard, OH                 Elder Care Operators            Balanced Care at Hilliard, Inc.                $110,000/$1,265,000
                             of Hilliard, LLC

Lakemont Farms, PA*          Elder Care Operators            Balanced Care at Lakemont Farms, Inc.          $110,000/$970,000
                             of Lakemont Farms, LLC

York, PA*                    Elder Care Operators            Balanced Care at York, Inc.                    $110,000/$660,000
                             of York, LLC

Bristol, TN                  Elder Care Operators            Balanced Care at Bristol, Inc.                 $110,000/$600,000
                             of Bristol, LLC

Murfreesboro, TN             Elder Care Operators            Balanced Care at Murfreesboro, Inc.            $110,000/$660,000
                             of Murfreesboro, LLC
<FN>
--------------
* Lessor is MLD Delaware Trust; in all others, it is Nationwide Health Properties, Inc. 
</TABLE>
# National D.A.R.E. Day, 2008

For 25 years, Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.E.) has given school children across America an opportunity to gain the skills they need to avoid involvement in drugs, gangs, and violence. On National D.A.R.E. Day, we recognize those individuals who teach America's children how to resist peer pressure and live productive, drug-free, and violence-free lives. 

Millions of our Nation's young people have learned about the dangerous effects of drug abuse with the help of the D.A.R.E. program. Parents, law enforcement officials, teachers, and counselors are on the front lines of this effort and are sending our kids a clear message that drug use is dangerous and unacceptable. In classrooms across the country, police officers are answering students' tough questions about drugs and crime and encouraging an open line of communication between students and law enforcement. 

My Administration is committed to reducing drug use among young people, and we are working to cut the supply of drugs coming into our country and fight demand here at home. Additionally, we are helping spread the message of drug prevention through the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign and the Partnership for a Drug-Free America. The Helping America's Youth initiative, led by First Lady Laura Bush, is working with community leaders to address challenges facing young people on a daily basis. These and other efforts are helping to combat the destructive cycle of drug addiction. 

All Americans have a responsibility to encourage others to turn away from drug abuse and to make good choices in life. During National D.A.R.E. Day, we renew our commitment to providing our youth the knowledge and encouragement they need to resist the pressures that can lead them to experiment with drugs and violent activities. By working together, we can help our children build lives of purpose and strengthen our communities, one heart and one soul at a time. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim April 10, 2008, as National D.A.R.E. Day. I urge all young people to make right choices and call upon all Americans to recognize our collective responsibility to combat every form of drug abuse and to support all those who work to help our children avoid drug use and violence. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ninth day of April, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 08-1124

Billing code 3195-01-P
310 S.E.2d 206

#### STATE of West Virginia ex rel. Barbara Ella ADKINS v. Thomas Edward HOSEY, Jr.

No. 15630.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Dec. 13, 1983.

S. Clark Woodroe, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charleston, for appellant.

No counsel for appellee.

PER CURIAM:

The State, at the relation of Barbara Ella Adkins, appeals the Cabell County Circuit Court’s dismissal of a complaint and warrant charging Thomas Edward Hosey, Jr. with being the father of an illegitimate female child. We conclude that the case should be reinstated, and reverse the circuit court.

.. The child in. question was bom on February 29, 1976. On June 6, 1978 a warrant was issued by a Cabell County magistrate charging that the respondent fathered the child. The relator was permitted to withdraw the complaint and warrant on March 19, 1981, after the respondent promised to pay support for the child. The respondent did not keep his promise, however, and the relator moved to revive the warrant in *690magistrate court on August 28, 1981. The magistrate held that the magistrate court lacked jurisdiction to compromise or dismiss a paternity action, and remanded the original warrant to the sheriff for execution. The respondent was served with this warrant on September 10, 1981.

On October 2, 1981 the respondent appeared in circuit court, pled not guilty, and moved to dismiss the warrant, contending that it was reinstituted after the three-year statute of limitations for bastardy proceedings had run, and was improperly reopened in magistrate court. The circuit judge dismissed the case, without stating his reasons for so doing. The State now seeks to reopen the proceedings to establish support and paternity for the child.

In syllabus point 1 of *State ex rel. S.M.B. v. D.A.P.,*168 W.Va. 455, 284 S.E.2d 912 (1981), we held:

> “The arbitrary imposition of a three year limitation of actions to establish paternity established by *W.Va.Code,*48-7-1 [1969] is unconstitutional under *W.Va. Const,*art. Ill, §§ 10 and 17.”

Therefore, any decision by the circuit court based upon this statute of limitations constituted reversible error.

We are also of the opinion that the magistrate court was without jurisdiction to compromise or dismiss a bastardy proceeding. *Dent v. McDougle,*75 W.Va. 588, 590, 84 S.E. 382, 383 (1915); *Holmes v. Clegg,*131 W.Va. 449, 452, 48 S.E.2d 438, 440 (1948), *rev’d on other grounds,*292 S.E.2d 654, 656 (1981). Thus, the original warrant was still of legal force and effect at the time of the circuit court’s action, and the State was entitled to proceed upon it to the merits of the case.

For the foregoing reasons, the October 26, 1981 decision of the Circuit Court of Cabell County is hereby reversed, and the case is remanded with directions that the proceedings In Bastardy, No. 81-2911, be returned to the docket of the court.

Reversed and remanded.
**Exhibit 4.18.3**

**Amendment No. 3****to License No. 17951 (registration series A 017215)****dated April 26, 2001**

To amend clause 8 of the Conditions For Carrying Out Activities Under License No. 17951 to read as follows:

“8.

Telematic services shall be provided to the users of the cellular mobile communications network and of the telematic services of OJSC “KB Impuls”.

 

| **First Deputy Minister****of the Russian Federation for****Telecommunications and****Informatization** |   | /Signature/ |   | B.D. Antoniouk |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------|--------|----------------|
|                                                                                                    |   |        |   |           |
|                                                                                                    |   | /seal/      |   | April 11, 2003 |
|                                                                                                    |   |        |   |           |
| **Head of the Department****of the Organization****of Licensing Activity**                              |   | /Signature/ |   | N.M.Popov      |
- page1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 08-1080 Filed 3-25-08; 1:23 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 117

Teleconference Meeting

June 6, 2017 

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537 

Participant Code: 9933701

11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) Start

• Roll-call – Mr. Katz, DFO

• Welcome – Dr. Melius, Chair

• March Board Meeting Final Vote Tallies – Mr. Katz, DFO

• GSI Site Profile Review Follow-up – Dr. Melius

• Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition Status Update – Mr. Rutherford, DCAS

• Updates from Work Groups and Subcommittees (as necessary) – WG/SC Chairs

• Plans for the August 2017 Board Meeting – All Members

Adjourn
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RODNEY DEAN JACKSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 18

- 17442

D.C. No. 1:17

- cv

- 00165

- GSA

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California Gary S. Austin, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 6, 2021 * *

Before: SILVERMAN, GRABER, and CLIFTON , Circuit Judges.

Rodney Jackson appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability insurance

benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social

Security Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for de cision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 8 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

§ 405(g). We review the district court’s affirmance of the administrative law

judge’s (“ALJ”) decision de novo and will reverse only if the ALJ’s decision is not

supported by substantial evidence or if the ALJ applied the wrong legal standard.

Molina v. Astrue , 674 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir. 2012)

, superseded by regulation

on other grounds . We affirm the district court’s judgment.

Substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s finding that Jackson’s testimony

regarding his physical symptoms and limitations was “not entirely credible.” The

ALJ performed the required two

- step analysis and provided “ specific, clear and

convincing reasons ” for her finding

. Tommasetti v. Astrue , 53 3 F.3d 1035, 1039

(9th Cir. 2008) (quoting Smolen v. Chater , 80 F.3d 1273, 1281 (9th Cir. 1996))

.

The ALJ properly relied on contradictions between the medical record , including

an examining doctor’s opinion

, and Jackson’s testimony about his back pain an d

limitations. See Rollins v. Massanari , 261 F.3d 853, 857 (9th Cir. 2001). The ALJ

also properly considered Jackson’s course of treatment and failure to follow up

with prescribed treatment

. See Molina , 674 F.3d at 1113

– 14 (ALJ may consider

claimant’s failure to seek treatment or to follow a prescribed course of treatment);

Meanel v. Apfel , 172 F.3d 1111, 111 4 (9th Cir. 1999) (subjective pain complaints

properly discredited where claimant received “minimal” and “conservat ive”

treatment).

AFFIRMED.
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 136 

Teleconference Meeting

October 27, 2020 

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537 

Participant Code: 9933701

11:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) Start

• Roll-call/Welcome – Dr. Roberts, DFO

• Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) Petition Status Update – Mr. Rutherford, DCAS

• Updates from Work Groups and Subcommittees (as necessary) – WG/SC Chairs

• Plans for the December 2020 Board Meeting – All Members

Adjourn
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the 

Subcommittee on Dose Reconstruction Review

Sept. 13, 2016

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

10:30 a.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll-call 

DISCUSSION

1. Three Blind Case Reviews from Set 22

2. Final Case Review Issue Resolution for Sets 10-13; Hooker 

Electrochemical Case.

3. Case Reviews Issue Resolution for Sets 14-18 (Oak Ridge, Paducah 

GDP, SRS, RFP, INL, NTS, AOO, and other facilities) 

5:00 p.m. Adjourn