alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5582 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct a study 

and submit a report on barriers to accessing abuse-deterrent opioid 

formulations for individuals enrolled in a plan under part C or D of 

the Medicare program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2018 

Mr. CARTER of Georgia (for himself, Mr. LOEBSACK, and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

conduct a study and submit a report on barriers to 

accessing abuse-deterrent opioid formulations for individuals enrolled in a plan under part C or D of the Medicare program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited at the ‘‘Abuse Deterrent Ac5 cess Act of 2018’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5582 IH

1 SEC. 2. STUDY ON ABUSE-DETERRENT OPIOID FORMULA2 TIONS ACCESS BARRIERS UNDER MEDICARE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Health 

5 and Human Services shall conduct a study and submit to 

6 Congress a report on the adequacy of access to abuse-de7 terrent opioid formulations for individuals with chronic 

8 pain enrolled in an MA–PD plan under part C of title 

9 XVIII of the Social Security Act or a prescription drug 

10 plan under part D of such title of such Act, taking into 

11 account any barriers preventing such individuals from ac12 cessing such formulations under such MA–PD or part D 

13 plans, such as cost-sharing tiers, fail-first requirements, 

14 and prior authorization requirements. 

15 (b) DEFINITION OF ABUSE-DETERRENT OPIOID FOR16 MULATION.—In this section, the term ‘‘abuse-deterrent 

17 opioid formulation’’ means an opioid with certain abuse18 deterrent properties, such as physical or chemical barriers, 

19 agonist or antagonist combinations, aversion properties, 

20 delivery system mechanisms, or other features designed to 

21 prevent abuse of such opioid. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20278

Conference Calendar

 

ROLAND H. RUDD,

also known as Elisha Aziz Muhammed,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

AMY H. SCUDDER; SAMUEL ROGERS;

T. CASCIATO; T. DRAPER; WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-94-CV-169

- - - - - - - - - -

October 20, 1998

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Roland H. Rudd, TDCJ-ID # #283539, appeals the

district court’s judgment in favor of the defendants in this

civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He

challenges several rulings made by the district court during his

jury trial.

 An appellant, even one pro se, who wishes to challenge

findings or conclusions that are based on proceedings at a 
No. 97-20278

-2-

trial has the responsibility to order a transcript. Fed. R. App.

P. 10(b); Powell v. Estelle, 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992). 

This court does not consider the merits of an issue when an

appellant fails in that responsibility. Powell, 959 F.2d at 26. 

 Rudd has not provided a trial transcript. All issues raised

on appeal require examination of the transcript. We must

therefore decline to consider all issues Rudd raises. See

Alizadeh v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 910 F.2d 234, 237 (5th Cir.

1990). 

 Because there is no issue before us of arguable merit, the

appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983). Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 28, 2010 

s0525 

Order 

 

May 28, 2010 

141094 & (3) 

EMILY CONWAY, 

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 141094 

BOARD OF LAW EXAMINERS, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because 

the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.
CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 To
        the
        Stockholders and Board of Directors
 Westside
        Energy Corporation
 Houston,
        Texas
 
 We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
 Statements
        on Form S-8 (No. 333-124890 and No. 333-114686) our report dated
 April
        16,
        2007, with respect to the financial statements of Westside Energy
 Corporation
        included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB as of December 31,
 2006
        and
        each of the two years then ended.
 
 
 Malone
        & Bailey, PC
 www.malone-bailey.com
 Houston,
        Texas
 
 April
        17,
        2007
# r--6--6f

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23
- 0570 CHRISTOPHER BEADLES and HEATHER BEADLES,

Plaintiffs and Appellees,
v. JARED MECHAM, et al.

Defendant and Appellant. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Michael Alan Ferrington,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring app ointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this October 18, 2 023.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court
c: Joanna Nell Galbraith, Laura Jean Brammer Webb, Douglas Scotti, Michael Alan Ferrington 10/18/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0570
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Independent Auditors’ Consent**

 

 

The Board of Directors 

Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the registration statement (No. 333-104906 and No. 333-28217) on Forms S-8of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary of our report dated January 30,2004, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial condition ofAccess Anytime Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2003 and 2002,and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity,and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form10-KSB of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc.

 

 

**KPMG LLP**

 

 

Albuquerque, New Mexico

February 26, 2004

 

----
| Total                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| ~ http://xbrl.sec.gov/rr/role/RiskReturnDetail column period compact * row primary compact * ~ |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Contains a command for the SEC Viewer for the role corresponding to RiskReturnDetailData
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**rr_RiskReturnDetailTableTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**rr_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Meeting of the

Subcommittee on Dose Reconstruction Review

November 27, 2012 

Cincinnati Airport Marriott 

2395 Progress Dr. 

Hebron, KY 41048 

859-586-0166

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

8:30 a.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll-call 

Discussion

• Items related to NIOSH 10-year review

- Presentation of current findings from DCAS “blind” dose reconstruction quality 

control case reviews 

- Presentation of ORAU test plan for validating dose reconstruction tools

(workbooks)

- Presentation of historical-to-current ORAU peer-review procedures and results 

tracking 

- Presentation of categorical statistics on errors detected and/or corrected 

through current peer-review procedure

• Issue resolution and lessons learned for SC&A blind case reviews (2)

• Issue resolution (and consideration of review efficacy) for Rocky Flats Plant cases, 

review sets 10-13 

• Revisiting Board’s dose reconstruction case review process; 

Identification of options for path forward 

• Continuation of issue resolution for sets 8 – 9 

• Identification of next sites for issue resolution of review sets 10-13

5:00 p.m. Adjourn
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 121 (Monday, June 23, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 35432]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1376]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]In the Matter of:


Kafus Industries, Ltd., Kevco, Inc., andKings Road Entertainment, 
Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

June 19, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Kafus Industries, Ltd. because it has not filed any periodic reports 
since the period ended December 31, 1999.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Kevco, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the 
period ended September 30, 2000.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Kings Road Entertainment, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended April 30, 2005.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on June 19, 
2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on July 2, 2008.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 08-1376 Filed 6-19-08; 9:53 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Robert M. Dunn, the Chief Executive Officer of REMUDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 10th day of May, 2011.




/s/ Robert M. Dunn

_________________________

Robert M. Dunn

Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to REMUDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION and will be retained by REMUDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending January 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jackson Y. Dott, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Date: March 19, 2007

/s/   Jackson Y. Dott
------------------------
Jackson Y. Dott
Chief Executive Officer
<page>	  				        EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Christian Angstadt, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan
Stanley Managed Futures LV, L.P.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this  report is being
prepared;

    c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant?s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant?s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant?s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant?s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant?s internal control over
financial reporting; and




<page>
5.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant?s auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant?s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant?s ability to record, process, summarize, and
report financial information; and

    b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant?s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  August 14, 2009     By: /s/Christian Angstadt
                                  Christian Angstadt
                                  Chief Financial Officer,
                                  Demeter Management LLC,
                                  general partner of the registrant
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350
  1.
    
    The periodic report containing financial statements to which this certificate is an exhibit
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
 2.
    
    The information contained in the periodic report to which this certificate is an exhibit
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
   By:
    /s/ JEFFREY S. CARBIENERJeffrey S. CarbienerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUSA DOMINGO-GONZALEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-71919 

Agency No. A206-799-754 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2020**

Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Jesusa Domingo-Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying her application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 21 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 19-71919 

agency’s factual findings. Garcia-Milian v. Holder, 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 

2014). We deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that DomingoGonzalez failed to establish she was or would be persecuted in Guatemala on 

account of a protected ground. See Ayala v. Holder, 640 F.3d 1095, 1097 (9th Cir. 

2011) (even if membership in a particular social group is established, an applicant 

must still show that “persecution was or will be on account of his membership in 

such group”); Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (an 

applicant’s “desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or 

random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground.”). 

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that DomingoGonzalez failed to establish an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution as 

a member of a disfavored group. See Halim v. Holder, 590 F.3d 971, 979 (9th Cir. 

2009) (petitioner must demonstrate a “unique risk of persecution upon return that 

was distinct from the petitioner’s mere membership in a disfavored group.” 

(citation omitted)). Thus, Domingo-Gonzalez’s asylum claim fails. 

In this case, because Domingo-Gonzalez failed to establish eligibility for 

asylum, she failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye 

v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because 
 3 19-71919 

Domingo-Gonzalez failed to show it is more likely than not she would be tortured 

by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Guatemala. 

See Garcia-Milian, 755 F.3d at 1033-35 (concluding that petitioner did not 

establish the necessary “state action” for CAT relief).

Domingo-Gonzalez’s opposed motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry 

No. 1) is denied as moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 2 under Form N-1A
                                            Exhibit 3(ii) under Item 601/Reg. SK


                    Federated Municipal Securities Fund, Inc.

                                  Amendment #12
                                 to the By-Laws

                          (effective February 27, 1998)


Delete Section 7 Proxies of Article I, Meetings of Shareholders, and replace
with the following:


      Section 7. PROXIES. Any Shareholder entitled to vote at any meeting of
      Shareholders may vote either in person or by proxy, but no proxy which is
      dated more than eleven months before the meeting named therein shall be
      accepted unless otherwise provided in the proxy. Every proxy shall be in
      writing and signed by the Shareholder or his duly authorized agent or be
      in such other form as may be permitted by the Maryland General Corporation
      Law, including electronic transmissions from the shareholder or his
      authorized agent. Authorization may be given orally, in writing, by
      telephone, or by other means of communication. A copy, facsimile
      transmission or other reproduction of the writing or transmission may be
      substituted for the original writing or transmission for any purpose for
      which the original transmission could be used. Every proxy shall be dated,
      but need not be sealed, witnessed or acknowledged. Where Shares are held
      of record by more than one person, any co-owner or co-fiduciary may
      appoint a proxy holder, unless the Secretary of the Corporation is
      notified in writing by any co-owner or co-fiduciary that the joinder of
      more than one is to be required. All proxies shall be filed with and
      verified by the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary of the Corporation, or
      the person acting as Secretary of the Meeting. Unless otherwise
      specifically limited by their term, all proxies shall entitle the holders
      thereof to vote at any adjournment of such meeting but shall not be valid
      after the final adjournment of such meeting.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Diamond Information Institute, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Berge Abajian, President and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/S/ Berge AbajianBerge Abajian,President andPrincipal Accounting OfficerAugust 18, 2009