alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DONALD PERRY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv105-RH/GRJ

KAREN ROBERTS et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 6, and the objections, ECF Nos. 7 & 8. I have reviewed

de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration, 

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on May 14, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:11-cv-00105-RH-GRJ Document 9 Filed 05/14/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2010294EN.01000601.xml

| 29.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 October 2010

2010/C 294/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3857 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4584 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87040 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3164 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3668 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1500 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,630 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7098 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9646 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2698 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9869 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4158 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4195 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7501 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8459 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7994 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 557,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7451 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2667 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3422 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 382,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3088 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,726 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,5500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,516 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3742 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1935 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,6700 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3857

JPY

Japanese yen

112,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4584

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87040

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3164

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3668

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1500

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,630

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7098

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9646

RON

Romanian leu

4,2698

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9869

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4158

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4195

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7501

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8459

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7994

KRW

South Korean won

1 557,32

ZAR

South African rand

9,7451

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2667

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3422

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 382,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3088

PHP

Philippine peso

59,726

RUB

Russian rouble

42,5500

THB

Thai baht

41,516

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3742

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1935

INR

Indian rupee

61,6700

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5729 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5729

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To restrict the department in which the Coast Guard is operating from 
   implementing any rule requiring the use of biometric readers for 
   biometric transportation security cards until after submission to 
 Congress of the results of an assessment of the effectiveness of the 
                 transportation security card program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transportation Worker Identification 
Credential Accountability Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF TRANSPORTATION WORKER 
              IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIAL BIOMETRIC READER RULE.

    The department in which the Coast Guard is operating may not 
implement the rule entitled ``Transportation Worker Identification 
Credential (TWIC)-Reader Requirements'' (81 Fed. Reg. 57651), and may 
not propose or issue a notice of proposed rulemaking for any revision 
to such rule except to extend its effective date, or for any other rule 
requiring the use of biometric readers for biometric transportation 
security cards under section 70105(k)(3) of title 46, United States 
Code, before the end of the 60-day period beginning on the date of the 
submission under paragraph (5) of section 1(b) of Public Law 114-278 
(130 Stat. 1411 to 1412) of the results of the assessment required by 
that section.

SEC. 3. PROGRESS UPDATES.

    Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
and every 90 days thereafter until the submission under paragraph (5) 
of section 1(b) of Public Law 114-278 (130 Stat. 1411 et seq.) of the 
results of the assessment required by that section, the Secretary of 
Homeland Security shall report to the Committee on Homeland Security 
and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
Representatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
Transportation of the Senate regarding the implementation of that 
section.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 10, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5729

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To restrict the department in which the Coast Guard is operating from 
   implementing any rule requiring the use of biometric readers for 
   biometric transportation security cards until after submission to 
 Congress of the results of an assessment of the effectiveness of the 
                 transportation security card program.
```
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Meeting of the Fernald Work Group

December 4, 2014

Cincinnati Airport Marriot

2395 Progress Dr., Hebron, KY 41048

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537 Participant Pass Code: 9933701

9:00 a.m. Eastern Time: Welcome and roll-call/introductions

Work Group Discussion

• Summary of post-SEC thorium methodology and in vivo coworker model for the 1979 – 1988 timeframe

• SC&A presentation of new white paper: Review of Proposed NIOSH Methods for Reconstructing 

Thorium Doses at Fernald (1979–2006)

• Continued issues resolution for SC&A site profile review findings

• Work Group plans for the future

Adjourn
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 00-4007



#  H ASAN R ICHARD M ILLER , a/k/a Jamaican Rick, Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge.

(CR-99-43-1) Submitted: September 29, 2000 Decided: November 21, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Andrew G. Schopler, RUDOLF, MAHER, WIDENHOUSE &FIALKO, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellant. Walter C. Holton, Jr., United States Attorney, Sandra J. Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Appellant Hasan Miller was convicted pursuant to his guilty plea of one count of conspiracy to distribute in excess of fifty grams of cocaine base. On appeal, Miller alleges the district court erred in assessing a two-level enhancement, pursuant to U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 2D1.1(b)(1) (1998), for possession of a firearm and a three-level enhancement, pursuant to USSG § 3B1.1, for his role as supervisor or manager in the offense. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. Miller challenges his three level role enhancement as a manager or supervisor under § 3B1.1. The determination that the defendantplayed an aggravating role in the offense is essentially a factual question reviewable for clear error. See United States v. Sheffer , 896 F.2d 842, 846 (4th Cir. 1990). We find no clear error in the district court’s conclusion that Miller supervised or managed certain members of the conspiracy and that there were at least five individuals involved in the offense. Miller also assigns error to the district court’s enhancement of his sentence for possession of a firearm during the commission of theoffense. A defendant may be held liable for the possession of a firearm by a co-conspirator during the conspiracy if the possession was reasonably foreseeable by the defendant. See United States v. Kimberlin , 18 F.3d 1156, 1159-60 (4th Cir. 1994). Further, this court hasdetermined that possession of a firearm is a foreseeable event in matters involving the exchange of drugs for large amounts of cash. See id. at 1160. We find possession of a firearm by Miller’s coconspirator Anthony Mark was reasonably foreseeable to Miller. Having considered each of Appellants’ claims and finding them to be without merit, we affirm the convictions and sentences imposed by 2 U NITED S TATES v. M ILLERthe district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3 U NITED S TATES v. M ILLER
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Meeting of the 

Los Alamos Work Group 

May 14, 2012 

Cincinnati Airport Marriott 

2395 Progress Dr. 

Hebron, KY 41048 

859-586-0166 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

9:00 a.m. Eastern Time Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

I. Discussion Items (cites are matrix finding numbers) 

1. Dose reconstructability of Mixed Fission and Activation Products by 1976 

2. Dose reconstructability of “exotic” radionuclides by 1976 

3. Completeness and reliability of LANL in vitro and in vivo data, and adequacy of 

co-worker model 

4. Feasibility of Dose Estimation for Neutron Exposure at LANL by 1976 

5. Feasibility of Dose Estimation for radiological exposures at LAMPF/LANSCE 

6. Feasibility of Dose Estimation for Special Tritium Compounds 

7. Unmonitored Exposure of Support Service Personnel (no actions) 

8. Petitioner Issues: 

a. Firing Site (1.2) 

b. Badge access (1.3) 

c. Occupational environmental exposures (1.5) 

d. Cerro Grande fire (1.7) 

e. Comparison of LANL to NTS operations (1.8) 

II. WG Recommendations, Plans for June Board Meeting, and Review of Action Items 

Adjourn.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131994 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131994 COA: 259532 Saginaw CC: 04-024226-FC TRUMON DONTAE CANNON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 25, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Saginaw County Prosecuting Attorney to answer Issue IV of th e application for leav e to appeal (answer whether OV 10 was correc tly scored) within 28 days after the date of this order. The prosecutor shall particularly address how the circumstances of the case justify assessing points for predatory conduct, and address ho w, under the hierarchical scoring of OV 10 from 5 to 15 points, the egreg iousness of the conduct in this case exceeds, for example, the exploitation of a victim’s size or mental disability.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

p0130 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 2, 2007

Clerk
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

3:01cr97LAC - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. GERALD PHARIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs

GERALD PHARIS

Case No.3:01cr97LAC

ORDER

Your document, MOTION BY LETTER, was referred to the undersigned with the

following deficiencies:

The document does not have a Certificate of Service as required by Rule

5(b) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, showing proper

service.

The body of your pleading should state the nature of your request and what you

want the court to do for you.

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the document shall remain in the electronic

file, but the court will not consider it until you have corrected the above deficiencies

through the filing of a corrected document.

DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of January, 2006.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:01-cr-00097-LC-MD Document 181 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.1


 




	
  

  	
  COMMON
  INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR
  CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP TO COME THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of FULLY
  PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF SMART & FINAL
  STORES, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder
  hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly
  endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned and registered by
  the Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation
  has caused this certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its duly
  authorized officers. Dated: PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SENIOR VICE
  PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: WELLS FARGO BANK,
  N.A. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AMERICAN FINANCIAL
  PRINTING INCORPORATED – MINNEAPOLIS 

  






 















	
  

  	
  The following
  abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate,
  shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to
  applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM – as tenants in common UTMA –
  Custodian  (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT – as
  tenants by entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors JT TEN – as joint
  tenants with right of survivorship Act 
  and not as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may also
  be used though not in the above list. For value received hereby sell, assign,
  and transfer unto (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING
  POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the
  within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney
  to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with
  full power of substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO
  THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE
  CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY
  CHANGE WHATEVER. SIGNATURE GUARANTEED ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A
  FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN
  THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK
  STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK
  EXCHANGES MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A
  NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
  IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
EXHIBIT
32.02








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Profile MV, L.P. (the
“Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.




























By:
            /s/
      Christian AngstadtName:
            Christian
      AngstadtTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer ofDemeter
      Management LLC,general
      partner of the registrantDate:
            November
      16, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The  undersigned, Jag Sandhu, President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Financial & Accounting Officer and a Director of Nava Resources, Inc. (the  “Company”), certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes  of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  of the Company for the Quarter ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   October 25, 2010

By: /s/ Jag Sandhu

Name:  Jag Sandhu  Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal  Financial & Accounting Officer) 

A  signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
Case 3:11-cr-00042-MCR   Document 19   Filed 09/26/11   Page 1 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00042-MCR   Document 19   Filed 09/26/11   Page 2 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00042-MCR   Document 19   Filed 09/26/11   Page 3 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00042-MCR   Document 19   Filed 09/26/11   Page 4 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00042-MCR   Document 19   Filed 09/26/11   Page 5 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00042-MCR   Document 19   Filed 09/26/11   Page 6 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00042-MCR   Document 19   Filed 09/26/11   Page 7 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00042-MCR   Document 19   Filed 09/26/11   Page 8 of 8
Pantex Work Group Meeting Agenda

Date: May 4, 2010

Cincinnati Airport Marriott 

2395 Progress Dr. 

Hebron, KY 41048 

859-586-0166

Conference Call Number: (866)-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

Start Time: 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time

1. Roll-call 

2. Discussion of the Pantex SEC Petition Evaluation Review Issues

• Overview of SC&A Review by SC&A (see attached issues matrix)

• Issue-by-issue discussion between SC&A, DCAS, and Work Group

• Petitioner questions

3. Discussion of Petitioner’s Comments (submitted by Mr. Samuels and Ms. Ray) 

• Discussion of Petitioner’s issues

• Petitioner clarifications, questions, additional input

4. Action Items and Future Meeting

• Action items for DCAS

• Action items for SC&A

• Timeframe for future meeting
Sub Item 77Q1(a)


(i)  Certificate  of  Correction to the Articles of Amendment to the Articles of
     Amendment and Restatement of the Articles of  Incorporation of INVESCO Bond
     Funds, Inc. dated May 17, 2000, filed with Post-Effective  Amendment No. 49
     to INVESCO Bond Funds, Inc. Registration Statement on February 14, 2002 and
     incorporated  herein by reference.

(ii) Certificate  of  Correction  to the  Articles of  Amendment  to Articles of
     Incorporation  of INVESCO Income Funds,  Inc. dated October 29, 1998, filed
     with   Post-Effective   Amendment  No.  49  to  INVESCO  Bond  Funds,  Inc.
     Registration  Statement  on February  14, 2002 and  incorporated  herein by
     reference.

(iii)Certificate  of  Correction  to the  Articles of  Amendment  of Articles of
     Incorporation of INVESCO Bond Funds, Inc. dated August 13, 1999, filed with
     Post-Effective  Amendment No. 49 to INVESCO Bond Funds,  Inc.  Registration
     Statement on February 14, 2002 and incorporated herein by reference.

(iv) Articles  Supplementary to the Articles of Amendment and Restatement of the
     Articles of  Incorporation  of INVESCO Bond Funds,  Inc. dated February 13,
     2002,  filed with  Post-Effective  Amendment  No. 49 to INVESCO Bond Funds,
     Inc. Registration Statement on February 14, 2002 and incorporated herein by
     reference.
# C_2009173EN.01000601.xml

| 25.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 173/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 173/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 July 2009

2009/C 173/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4227 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4447 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86700 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5995 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5217 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,472 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,59 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7030 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1880 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2150 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7413 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5407 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0259 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1663 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0487 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 775,37 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0494 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7185 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3320 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 226,34 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0214 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,387 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,0990 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,322 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6904 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7555 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,6170 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4227

JPY

Japanese yen

134,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4447

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86700

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5995

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5217

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,472

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,59

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7030

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1880

RON

Romanian leu

4,2150

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7413

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5407

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0259

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1663

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0487

KRW

South Korean won

1 775,37

ZAR

South African rand

11,0494

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7185

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3320

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 226,34

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0214

PHP

Philippine peso

68,387

RUB

Russian rouble

44,0990

THB

Thai baht

48,322

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6904

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7555

INR

Indian rupee

68,6170

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---