alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

EXHIBIT 21.0

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

3692116 CANADA INC.
Incorporated in Canada

C & G MARKETING, INC.
Incorporated in the state of Alabama

COMPASS CONSUMABLES INC.
Incorporated in Canada

COMPASS EXPORT MARKETING (OVERSEAS) LIMITED
Incorporated in the British Virgin Islands (Inactive)

COMPUTER SHOWCASE, INC.
Incorporated in the state of Georgia

CONSOLIDATED MEDIA SYSTEMS, INC.
Incorporated in the state of Tennessee

DIGITAL NETWORKS, INC.
Incorporated in the state of Maryland

DIVERSIFIED DATA PRODUCTS, INC.
Incorporated in the state of Michigan

DIVERSIFIED DATA PRODUCTS (U.K.) LIMITED
Incorporated in England

DUO-COMMUNICATIONS OF CANADA LTD.
Incorporated in Canada

FAIRVIEW - AFX, INC.
Incorporated in the state of Oklahoma

MCSi  CANADA INC.
Incorporated in the province of Ontario, Canada

MCSi-FLORIDA, INC.
Incorporated in the State of Florida

MCSi PURCHASING L.L.C.
A Maryland limited liability company

MCSi-TEXAS, INC.
Incorporated in the state of Texas

MIDWEST VISUAL EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
Incorporated in the state of Illinois

<Page>

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT PAGE 2

TECHNICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.
Incorporated in the state of Georgia

VIDEO IMAGES, INC.
Incorporated in the state of Wisconsin
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) DIVISION ONE r•-)

--.-- ..,-.J .__ 

### cr) `r,:
- .
fr. Respondent, ) 70 CD --.1 _

) No. 74246-9-1 I -11
,.........., 0-, V. ) (PSI

.... .

) UNPUBLISHED OPINION 

### -4- rSTEVE THOMAS YOUNG, ) 

### 9? , tr)

Appellant. )

) FILED: March 6, 2017 CJI ) DWYER, J. — Steve Young was charged and convicted of arson in the first degree. The sentencing court imposed a standard range sentence of 23 months imprisonment. On appeal, Young contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the concept of reasonable doubt. This is so, he avers, because the court gave as its instruction the jury instruction defining "reasonable doubt" set forth at 11 Washington Practice: Washington Pattern Jury Instructions: Criminal 4.01, at 85 (3d ed. 2008) (WPIC). Young contends that this instruction unconstitutionally undermines the presumption of innocence and shifts the burden of proof to the defendant. We disagree and affirm. 1 Young contends that WPIC 4.01, which states "[a] reasonable doubt is one for which a reason exists and may arise from the evidence or lack ofNo.74246-9-1/2

evidence," unconstitutionally undermines the presumption of innocence and shifts the burden of proof to the defendant. This is so, he asserts, because WPIC 4.01 instructs jurors that they must be able to articulate a reason for having a reasonable doubt. The trial court did not err in so instructing the jury. Our Supreme Court has mandated that an instruction in the words of WPIC 4.01 be given in all cases. State v. Bennett, 161 Wn.2d 303, 318, 165 P.3d 1241 (2007). The constitutionality of the challenged instruction has been reaffirmed. State v. Kalebaugh, 183 Wn.2d 578, 586-87, 355 P.3d 253 (2015). We have recognized this controlling authority. State v. Lizarraga, 191 Wn. App. 530, 567, 364 P.3d 810 (2015), review denied, 185 Wn.2d 1022 (2016). The trial court did not err by doing the same. In any event, WPIC 4.01 does not require jurors to articulate a reason. "[A] doubt for which a reason exists" is not the same as "a doubt for which a reason can be given." Kalebaugh, 183 Wn.2d at 584. Young's argument is meritless. II Young requests that no costs associated with his appeal be assessed against him, as he was found indigent by the trial court. Pursuant to RAP 14.2, we may exercise our discretion not to impose appellate costs. State v. Sinclair, 192 Wn. App. 380, 393, 367 P.3d 612, review denied, 185 Wn.2d 1034 (2016). The State does not contest his claim. Accordingly, we exercise our discretion and will not impose appellate costs against Young.

2No.74246-9- 1 / 3

Affirmed.

3 We concur:
**CH** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 2 - 0 567 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee , v. LESLIE DEAN ERNST ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 23 , 2024 , within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s response brie f.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 2 2024

08/02/2024

Case Number: DA 22-0567
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

133 

KA 12-01360 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, FAHEY, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JUAN ESTEVEZ-SANTOS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

JASON L. COOK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, PENN YAN (PATRICK T. CHAMBERLAIN OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Yates County Court (W. Patrick

Falvey, J.), rendered September, 20, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal use of a firearm in

the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is 

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of criminal use of a firearm in the second

degree (Penal Law § 265.08 [2]). “Defendant did not move to withdraw

the plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction and thus his

contention that the plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and

intelligently entered is not preserved for our review” (People v

Anderson, 34 AD3d 1318, 1318, lv denied 8 NY3d 843). Contrary to

defendant’s further contention, the record establishes that he

knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal

(see generally People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver

forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence

(see id. at 255; see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v

Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: February 7, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 10.17


 


Written Description
of Consulting Arrangement with John Leonesio.


 


Effective January 1, 2014,
John Leonesio resigned as chief executive officer of The Joint Corp. and became non-executive chairman of The Joint Corp.’s
board of directors. The Joint Corp. agreed to pay Mr. Leonesio a consulting fee in connection with his service as non-executive
chairman of the board and his ongoing provision of consulting services on an “as needed” basis. The consulting fee
was established at the rate of $90,000 annually, payable in monthly installments.


 


This arrangement may be
terminated by either party without notice and without penalty.
# C_2010243EN.01000201.xml

| 10.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 September 2010

2010/C 243/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2715 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4461 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82580 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2488 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2859 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8725 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,683 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 285,76 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7088 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9380 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2820 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9230 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3750 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3131 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8789 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7516 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7060 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 484,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,1964 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6248 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2863 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 390,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9550 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,095 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,2763 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,240 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,1914 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5217 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,0894 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2715

JPY

Japanese yen

106,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4461

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82580

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2488

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2859

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8725

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,683

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

285,76

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7088

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9380

RON

Romanian leu

4,2820

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9230

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3750

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3131

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8789

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7516

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7060

KRW

South Korean won

1 484,64

ZAR

South African rand

9,1964

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6248

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2863

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 390,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9550

PHP

Philippine peso

56,095

RUB

Russian rouble

39,2763

THB

Thai baht

39,240

BRL

Brazilian real

2,1914

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5217

INR

Indian rupee

59,0894

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
LEAF Equipment Finance Fund 4, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Moskovitz, Chief
Financial Officer of the General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                                
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 23, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert K. Moskovitz                                                        
|                        |  |  |  | Name: Robert K. Moskovitz Title: Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### APR 13 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
MICHELLE GLOVER,a natural person and citizen of the United Kingdom, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. VAIL CORPORATION, doing business as Vail Associates, Inc., a Colorado corporation; VAIL ASSOCIATES, INC., a Colorado corporation; VAIL ASSOCIATES HOLDINGS, LTD., a Colorado corporation; VAIL HOLDINGS, INC., a Colorado corporation,

Defendants - Appellees. No. 97-1100

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

(D. Ct. No. 96-B-394)
Michael J. Roche (John B. Moorhead with him on the briefs), of Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Denver, Colorado, for Plaintiff-App ellant. David H. Yun (Stephen Hopkins with him on the brief ), of Long & Jaudon, P.C., Denver, Colorado, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before TACHA , McKAY , and EBEL , Circuit Judges.- 2 -

TACHA , Circuit Judge.
We AFFIRM the holding of the district court for sub stantially the same reasons discussed by the district court in its publ ished opinion. SeeGlover v. Vail Corp. , 955 F. Supp. 105 (D. Colo. 1997).
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pansoft Company Limited (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”), I,
Hugh Wang, Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August
      14, 2009
            /s/
      Hugh WangHugh
      WangChairman
      (Principal Executive Officer)
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-93,612-01

EX P ARTE P AUL G OVEA, Appl icant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR16-0180- 01 IN THE 415T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM P ARK

ER COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Applicant was convicted of evading arr est/detention with a motor vehicle and sentenc ed to forty y ear s’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Gove a v. State , No. 02-16-00368- CR (Tex. App.—For t Worth Aug

. 10, 2017) (not desig nated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk f

orwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends t h at appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his conviction had been affir med and advise him of hi s rig ht to file a pro se petition for discretionary revie w. Ba sed on the rec ord, the trial court has deter mined that appellate counsel’s perf ormanc e was defic ient and that Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discretionar y revie w but for2

counsel’s de ficient pe rfor mance . Relief is g rante d. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow , 180 S.W

. 3 d 135 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Applicant may file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the Second Court of Appea ls in cause number 02-16-00368- CR. Sho uld Applicant decide to file a petition for discretionar y revie w, he must file it with this Court within thi rty

day s from the da te of this Court’s mandate. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Te xa s D e p a r tm e n t o f Cr im in al J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and the Boa rd of Par dons and Paroles.

Deliver ed: April 6, 2022 Do not publish
EXHIBIT 10.3
                                                               ------------

                         SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


In connection with the Annual Report of  Instrumentation  Laboratory S.p.A.
(the  "Company")  on Form 20-F for the period  ended  November  30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jose Manent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.



Dated: May 29, 2003



/s/ Jose Manent
-----------------------
Jose Manent
Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>


                         SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


In connection  with the Annual Report of Gallaher Group plc (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the  period  ended  December  30,  2002 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Jose Luis Martin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.



Dated: May 29, 2003



/s/ Jose Luis Martin
-----------------------
Jose Luis Martin
Chief Financial Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-21-00205-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

415th District Court of Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-18-1452

Before Kerr, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE R.W., Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and real party 

in interest’s response and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, 

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: August 31, 2021
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Rongfu
Aquaculture, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of his or her knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March
      31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and








(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
August 13, 2010




/s/
      Keith HorKeith
      HorChief Financial
      Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Rongfu Aquaculture, Inc. and will be retained by Rongfu Aquaculture, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 Of THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
David B. Menzel, Chief Financial Officer of Echo Global Logistics, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, that:

(1)   The
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the "Form 10-Q") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 13, 2009

/s/ DAVID B. MENZEL David B. Menzel Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Miller, Diane M.

From: Montgomery, Cheryl C [ccmont@solutia.com]

Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 3:48 PM

To: NIOCINDOCKET@CDC.GOV

Subject: COMMENT RE 42 CFR PART 83 PROPOSED RULE

Untitled Attachment 42CFRPart83,doc
(29 KB)


Cheryl C. Montgomery
86 Fox Drive
St. Peters, MO 63376
636-240-8386
April 7, 2003

NIOSH Docket Officer
NIOCINDOCKET@CDC.GOV

Re: Department of Health and Human Services
42 CFR Part 83
Procedure for Designating Classes of Employees as
Members of the Special Exposure Occupational Illness
Compensation Program Act of 2000; Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking; Proposed Rule

To: HHS Representative

I have studied the very lengthy publication of March 7, 2003 in the Federal Register on
the proposal noted above. I believe that many of the critical issues have been addressed
by public comments to date. However, I have several comments to reinforce those
published as well as to add a point that I did not see as directly addressed.

The proposal to authorized NIOSH to identify “if applicable” “a set of one or more types
of cancers to which NIOSH’s finding that it was not feasible to estimate dose with
sufficient accuracy” would serve to fragment a potential class. The original authorization
speaks to “exposure cohorts”; the rule does not address “disease cohorts”. Inclusion of
this change/addition to the original rule will significantly change the intent and
applicability.

In addition to the concerns already recorded about the length of time required by NIOSH
to complete dose reconstruction or to determine that “dose reconstruction is not feasible”
and then the additional time to add a class, I have concerns about the influence or control
that NIOSH may be given to the outcome of petitions. NIOSH is controlling the decision
(and timing for the decision) that “dose reconstruction is not feasible” thus controlling
one of the major factors necessary for petitions to add classes.

While I fully recognize that sufficiently detailed regulations must be maintained for
programs affecting so many people and such potentially large amounts of public monies,
we must all realize that people are dying while waiting for funds that are fully mandated
by law.

Cheryl Montgomery
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Rongfu
Aquaculture, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of his or her knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March
      31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and








(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
August 13, 2010




/s/
      Kelvin ChanKelvin
      ChanChief
      Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Rongfu Aquaculture, Inc. and will be retained by Rongfu Aquaculture, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED




PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE




SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Reach Messaging Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shane Gau, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




Date: June 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Shane GauShane GauChief Executive Officer




A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.