alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-981]



FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE & TIME: Tuesday, March 6, 2007 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-981 Filed 2-27-07; 3:07 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO . A

- 0589

- 18T2

MAURO IASPARRI, II,

Plaintiff

- Respondent,

v.

CITY OF JERSEY CITY and

its employees, agents, or servant s

, LA FESTA ITALIANA, INC. and

its employees, agents or servants,

HOLY ROSARY CHURCH and

it s employees, agents or servants

, and

J. FLETCHER CREAMER & SONS

and its employees, agents or

servants,

Defendants

,

and

JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL

UTILITIES AUTHORITY, and

its employees, agents, or servants,

Defendants

- Appellants.

_______________________________

Submitted December 19, 2019

– Decided

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the

internet

, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36

- 3.

December 31, 20192 A

- 0589

- 18T2 Before Judges Nugent and DeAlmeida.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law

Division, Hudson County, Docket No. L

- 2191

- 18.

Mindas & Morris, attorneys for appellant (Brendan H.

Morris, on the brief s ).

J ohn J. Smith, Jr., attorney for respondent.

PER CURIAM

The parties have advised us that this matter has been amicably settled

between them and stipulated to the dismissal of this appeal. Accordingly, the

appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

Dismissed.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5695 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to annually notify 

health care providers regarding permitted disclosures under Federal 

health care privacy law during emergencies, including overdoses, of certain health information to families, caregivers, and health care providers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2018 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself, Mr. WALBERG, and Mrs. DINGELL) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

annually notify health care providers regarding permitted 

disclosures under Federal health care privacy law during 

emergencies, including overdoses, of certain health information to families, caregivers, and health care providers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emmett’s Law’’. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5695 IH

1 SEC. 2. COMMUNICATION WITH FAMILIES DURING EMER2 GENCIES. 

3 (a) PROMOTING AWARENESS OF AUTHORIZED DIS4 CLOSURES DURING EMERGENCIES.—The Secretary of 

5 Health and Human Services, acting through the Adminis6 trator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 

7 and the Administration of the Health Resources and Serv8 ices Administration, shall annually develop and dissemi9 nate written materials (electronically or by other means) 

10 to health care providers regarding permitted disclosures 

11 under Federal health care privacy law during emergencies, 

12 including overdoses, of certain health information to fami13 lies, caregivers, and health care providers. 

14 (b) USE OF MATERIAL.—For the purposes of car15 rying out subsection (a), the Secretary of Health and 

16 Human Services may use material produced under section 

17 11004 of the 21st Century Cures Act (42 U.S.C. 1320d– 

18 2 note). 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 of
Flurida Group, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      August 10, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Yaru HangYaru
      HangChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Flurida Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Flurida Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending July 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marshall Chadwell, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


/s/   Marshall Chadwell
-------------------------------
Marshall Chadwell
Chief Financial Officer
September 15, 2003
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Pansoft Company Limited (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on September 25, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Hugh Wang,
      Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




September
                25, 2008
            /s/
                Hugh WangHugh
                WangChairman
                (Principal Executive
              Officer)
Epcylon Technologies, Inc.: Exhibit 10.1 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.1 

LOAN AGREEMENT 

THIS AGREEMENT dated as of May 21, 2014, between
Epcylon Technologies Inc. (the "Borrower") and Peter George (the
“Lender"). 

IN CONSIDERATION of the advancement of funds under the
terms and conditions of this Agreement and other good and valuable
consideration, the Parties agree as follows: 

On the execution of this Agreement the Lender accepts to lend
to the Borrower the sum of Fifty Thousand United States Dollars $50
000.00 (“the Loan”) on the terms and conditions set out in this Agreement.


1. Promise to Pay. For value received, Fifty Thousand
Dollars ($50 000.00) Borrower promises to pay Lender $50 000.00 and interest at
the yearly rate of 5% on the unpaid balance as specified below. 

2. Installments. Borrower will pay interest and
principal 13 months from the execution date of this agreement. 

3. Application of Payments. Payments will be applied
first to interest and then to principal. 

4. Security. This is an unsecured note

5. REDEMPTION. The Borrower may at any time during the
term and duration of the Loan Agreement redeem the Loan by providing a five day
notice to the Lender that the Borrower intends to redeem the Loan Agreement.
Payment of principal and interest will be calculated from date of execution to
date of redemption notice.

6. Convertible. The Lender may convert all or part of
the loan including principal and interest due into Series B Preferred Shares
as per the Board Resolution planned to be passed in a formal Board Meeting
on 28 August, 2014 creating the Series B Preferred Shares. Notice of the Series
B Preferred Shares will be filed with the State of Nevada. The company
undertakes to file the Series B registration immediately after the Corporate
Annual Filing is completed which is due August 31/2014.

At termination date of loan, if the Borrower has not converted
his Loan Agreement to shares of Series B Preferred OR if the Lender has
not redeemed the Loan, the Borrower will automatically convert his loan to the
Series B Preferred Shares. Such price per share shall be the lowest trading
price of the Company's shares on the Stock Exchange which its’ Common Shares
trade, by using the lowest share price of the preceding five business days prior
to the termination date of the loan with a minimum price of $0.20. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on
the date set forth above. 

	The “LENDER” 	 	The “BORROWER” 
	 	 	 
	Signature /s/ Peter George 	 	Signature /s/ Cato Kemmler 
	 	 	 
	Name: Peter George 	 	Name: Cato Kemmler 
	 	 	 
	Title: CEO 	 	Title: President 
	 	 	 
	Date: May 21/2014 	 	Date: May 21/2014
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008,      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ended June 30, 2008, fairly represents in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of New      Image Concepts, Inc. |

| Date:      August 11, 2008                                                                                                                                     |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                           |
| NEW      IMAGE CONCEPTS, INC.                                                                                                                                  |
|                                                                                                                                                           |
| By: /s/      Belen      Flores                                                                                                                                 |
| Belen      Flores Chairman      of the Board of Directors, Chief      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Controller,      Principal AccountingOfficer |
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the 

Subcommittee on Dose Reconstruction Review

September 28, 2017 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

10:30 a.m. Eastern Time

Welcome and roll-call 

DISCUSSION

1. Review of PER 61 (Bridgeport Brass)

2. Review Set 23 blind dose reconstruction cases (3: Sandia, Nevada Test 

Site, Sandia National Laboratory)

3. Review outstanding Type 2 cases from Sets 14-18 DOE Sites matrix: 

Brookhaven National Laboratory. 

4. Review Type 1 cases (as time permits) from Sets 19-21: Iowa Ordinance 

Plant, Sandia-Albuquerque, Pacific Proving Grounds, Nevada Test Site, Los 

Alamos National Laboratory, Feeds Material Production Center (Fernald), 

Pantex, Weldon Spring and Rocky Flats Plant 

4:30 p.m. Adjourn
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7208** 

RYAN RANDALL RAMEY , Defendant

– Appellant ,

versus
CHIEF JUSTICE WILLIAM B. TRAXLER, JR.; JUDGE DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ; JUDGE G. STEVEN AGEE; JUDGE CLYDE H. HAMILTON; RICHARD SEWELL, Case Manager; SAMUEL W. PHILLIPS, Secretary; JOHN DOE, c/o Secretary; JANE DOE, c/o Secretary , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. William B. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. ( 1:14

- cv
- 02390

- WMN )

Submitted : December 16, 2014 Decided: December 19, 2014

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Ryan Randall Ramey, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ryan Randall Ramey appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915 (e)(2)(B) (20 12 ). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Ramey v. Chief Justice Wm. B. Traxler , No. 1:14

- cv
- 02390

- WMN (D. Md. Aug. 18, 2014) . We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

 

Vita Food Products, Inc.

Chicago, Illinois

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-52261 and 333-116465) of Vita Food Products, Inc. and Subsidiary of ourreport dated February 15, 2006, except for certain matters described in Note 4,as to which the date is March 24, 2006, relating to the consolidated financialstatements which appear in this Form 10-K.

 

 
| Chicago, Illinois | /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP |   |
|-------------------|----------------------|--------|
| March 29, 2006    |                 |

 

----
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000759

18-JUN-2019

07:59 AM


NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HA WAI'I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER 

written judgment or written order. 

For example, in a premature appeal from an underlying 

proceeding for a criminal defendant's HRPP Rule 40 petition for 

post-conviction relief, the Supreme Court of Hawai'i held that, 

where a party filed his notice of appeal before the trial court's 

announcement of its final decision, that premature notice of 

appeal was a legal nullity that had no legal effect with respect 

to the written appealable final order that the trial court later 

entered. Grattafiori v. State, 79 Hawai'i 10, 13-14, 897 P.2d 

937, 940-41 (1995). 

In the instant case, Pai filed his October 4, 2018 

notice of appeal before the district court orally announced any 

final decision that could be appealable. Six months later, when 

the district court entered an appealable final judgment, namely 

the April 15, 2019 judgment dismissing this case without 

prejudice, Pai failed to file a notice of appeal from the April 

15, 2019 judgment. Therefore, we are without jurisdiction to 

address the merits of Pai's appeal. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that appellate court case number 

CAAP-18-0000759 is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, June 18, 2018.

Presiding Judge 

Associate Judge 

Associate Judge 

4
Agenda

Linde Ceramics WG Meeting

Thursday, 14 October 2010, 9 a.m. Eastern

Conference Call Number: (866)-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

Work Group Members: Chair Gen Roessler; Josie Beach, Mike Gibson, Jim Lockey

DCAS : Chris Crawford, David Allen, and Jim Neton

SC&A: Steve Ostrow, John Mauro, Bill Thurber

Welcome and Roll Call: Ted Katz

Background Information: Gen Roessler

Presentation by DCAS

“Evaluation of Radon Concentrations in the Utility Tunnels at Linde Ceramics

Response by SC&A to DCAS:

Discussion by WG

• Recommendation on SEC-00107 for possible presentation to ABRWH at November meeting 

in Santa Fe, NM
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Timothy J. Neher, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS I, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY
      that:





1.
      The
      Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008
      (the
“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
      this **** 13th
      day
      of August, 2008.


*/s/
              Timothy J. Neher*Timothy
              J. NeherChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
              Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS I, INC. and will be retained by ACCELERATED
      ACQUISITIONS I, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health

Los Alamos National Laboratory Work Group 

Teleconference: August 15, 2017 

11:00 a.m. Eastern Time

Conference Phone: 1-866-659-0537; Participant Code: 9933701#

Welcome and roll call

1. NIOSH SEC Petition Evaluation Addendum (1996-2005)

2. SC&A Review of Addendum

3. Petitioner Comments (optional)

4. Items for Soliciting Additional Worker Interviews/Input at August Board 

Meeting/Other Actions Items for Path Forward on SEC petition

5. Status of remaining Site Profile Issues (if time allows)

Adjourn
ABRWH

Surrogate Data Work Group

Agenda

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537; Participant Code: 9933701

November 5, 2010; 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time

1. Welcome/ participants roll call

2. Revised NIOSH Texas City Chemicals SEC Petition Evaluation Report – Tom Tomes 

(NIOSH)

3. Board questions and comments

4. Questions and comments from petitioners

5. Work Group Recommendations to Board
EXHIBIT 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jackson Y. Dott, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Date: December 15, 2006

/s/   Jackson Y. Dott
------------------------
Jackson Y. Dott
Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

p0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

141036 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141036 

 COA: 287620 

Washtenaw CC: 07-002291-FC 

DANIEL LEE HEMPHILL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 13, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
A94A2108.

#### METROPOLITAN PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. WHITE.

(470 SE2d 524)

Decided April 11, 1996.

*Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers,, Jonathan M. Engram, Eric D. Miller,*for appellant.

*Van C. Wilks,*for appellee.

Ruffin, Judge.

In *Metropolitan*&c. *Ins. Co. v. White,*217 Ga. App. 108 (456 SE2d 511) (1995), we reversed the trial court’s denial of Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and reversed our decision in *White v. Metropolitan*&c. *Ins. Co.,*266 Ga. 371 (467 SE2d 332) (1996). Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is hereby made the judgment of this Court.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Birdsong, P. J., and Blackburn, J., concur.*
AGENDA

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the 

Pantex Work Group

August 10, 2011

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537

Participant Pass Code: 9933701

9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

Work Group Discussion

• Summary of activities since last WG meeting

• NIOSH white paper: Pantex Bounding Uranium and Thorium 

• NIOSH Responses to “SC&A Draft Data Completeness and Adequacy Review for the 

Pantex Plant” 

• SC&A Summary of Pantex Onsite Review (memorandum) 

• Resolution of remaining SEC Issues

• Work Group conclusions and recommendation to full Board 

Adjourn