alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Actions and Policies of Certain Members of the Government of Belarus and Other Persons Undermining Democratic Processes or Institutions in Belarus

On June 16, 2006, by Executive Order 13405, I declared a national emergency and ordered related measures blocking the property of certain persons undermining democratic processes or institutions in Belarus, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706). I took this action to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Belarus and other persons that have undermined democratic processes or institutions; committed human rights abuses related to political repression, including detentions and disappearances; and engaged in public corruption, including by diverting or misusing Belarusian public assets or by misusing public authority. 

Because these actions and policies continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on June 16, 2006, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond June 16, 2008. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13405. 

                        This notice shall be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 08-1345

Billing code 3195-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         346,107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,507
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     34,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               422,433
<PP&E>                                         100,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 538,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          131,287
<BONDS>                                          9,755
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,200
<OTHER-SE>                                     366,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   538,442
<SALES>                                        431,587
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               431,587
<CGS>                                          593,273
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  593,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,054,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,673,239)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,673,239)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,673,239)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.86)


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv117-MP-GRJ

CONTENTS OF A BANK OF AMERICA

ACCOUNT #898042713732, UNDER THE

NAME OF ON TIME TAX SERVICE INC.

FT. LAUDERDALE ESCROW ACCOUNT,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

O R D E R

On January 17, 2012, the court entered a decree of forfeiture which erroneously

contained account information from a related forfeiture case. (Doc. 7). Under Rule 60(a)

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “[t]he court may correct a clerical mistake or a

mistake arising from oversight or omission whenever one is found in a judgment, order, or

other part of the record.”

Accordingly, the court’s Decree of Forfeiture (doc. 7) is hereby VACATED and a

corrected decree of forfeiture will issue separately.

DONE and ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00117-MP-GRJ Document 8 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 1
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 21

- 00205

- CV

___________________________

Original Procee din g

415th District Court of Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV

- 18

- 1452

Before Kerr, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### R.W. , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and real party

in interest ’ s response and is of the opi nion that relief should be denied. Accordingly,

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : August 31, 2021
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sungro Minerals, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.
            The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
      August 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.






Date:           November
      20, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/
      Malkeet BainsName:
                    Malkeet
      BainsTitle:
                    Chief
      Executive Officer







A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 18 (Monday, January 28, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 4879]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-300]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice if hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Integrative and Clinical Endocrinology and Reproduction Study Section, 
February 4, 2008, 8 a.m. to February 5, 2008, 3 p.m., Bethesda 
Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814 which was published 
in the Federal Register on January 15, 2008, 73 FR 2513-2516.
    The meeting will be held at the Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One 
Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814. The 
meeting dates and time remain the same. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: January 18, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-300 Filed 1-25-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meetings.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, RFA AA-08-001/002: The Role of Mitochondria in Alcohol-Induced Tissue Injury.                    

*Date:*                         March 17-18, 2008.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Philippe Marmillot, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3045, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-443-2861,                         *marmillotp@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: January 14, 2008.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 08-183 Filed 1-18-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PRECISION PETROLEUM CORPORATION (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Porterfield, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: May 12, 2009
|------------------



|By:/s/Richard PorterfieldRichard PorterfieldPresident and principal executive officer
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2010 of
Flurida Group, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      12/02/2010
              By:
              /s/ Yaru
      HangYaru
      HangChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Flurida Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Flurida Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
8:15 a.m. – 8:30 a.m. Welcome and Introduction Dr. James Melius, Chair 

8:30 a.m. – 8:50 a.m. NIOSH Program Update Mr. Stuart Hinnefeld, NIOSH 

8:50 a.m. – 9:10 a.m. DOL Program Update Mr. Frank Crawford, DOL 

9:10 a.m. – 9:30 a.m. DOE Program Update Dr. Patricia Worthington, DOE 

9:30 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. Coworker Dose Modeling 

Guidelines 

Dr. James Melius, SEC Issues 

Work Group (WG) Chair 

Dr. James Neton, NIOSH 

9:45 a.m. – 10:45 a.m. Dose Reconstruction Reviews Dr. James Melius, Dose 

Reconstruction Review
 

Methods WG Chair
 

10:45 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Break 

11:00 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. Carborundum Co. (Niagara 

Falls, New York) SEC 

Petition: 1943-1976 

Mr. Tom Tomes, NIOSH
 

Petitioner(s)
 

12:30 p.m. – 2:00 p.m. Lunch 

2:00 p.m. – 2:15 p.m. SEC Petitions Status Update Mr. LaVon Rutherford, 

NIOSH 

2:15 p.m. – 3:45 p.m. Board Work Session Dr. James Melius, Chair 

3:45 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. Break 


 

AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health – Meeting 106 

Residence Inn by Marriott, 635 West Broadway
 

Idaho Falls, Idaho 83402, Phone: 208-542-0000; Fax: 208-542-0021
 
 

Teleconference Phone: 866-659-0537, Participant Code: 9933701#
 

LiveMeeting Link: https://www.livemeeting.com/cc/cdc/join?id=
 

9RTB4M&role=attend&pw=ABRWH
 
 

Meeting ID: 9RTB4M Entry Code: ABRWH
 
 

Thursday, July 23, 2015 

NOTE: All times in Mountain Time 

1
 
4:00 p.m. – 5:30 p.m. Idaho National Laboratory Mr. Phil Schofield, WG Chair 

(Scoville, Idaho) SEC Dr. Tim Taulbee, NIOSH 

Petition: 1949-1970 Mr. Robert Barton, SC&A 

Mr. John Stiver, SC&A 

Petitioner(s): 

5:30 p.m. – 6:30 p.m.* Public Comment 

6:30 p.m. Adjourn 


 

*Public comment period will conclude at 6:30 p.m. or following the final call for public 

comment, whichever comes first. If you plan to comment, please be prepared to comment at 

5:30 p.m. 

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

# Time and Date: 

A closed meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, July 23, 2008. 

# Place:

Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006. 

# Status:

The meeting will be closed to the public. 

# Matter to be Considered at the Meeting:

Periodic Update of Examination Program Development and Supervisory Findings. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

                        Shelia Willis, Paralegal Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or                         *williss@fhfb.gov*.                     

By the Federal Housing Finance Board. 

Dated: July 16, 2008. 

Neil R. Crowley, 

Deputy General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 08-1453 Filed 7-17-08; 11:06 am] 

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
01-30-06 P03:05 IN

January 18, 2006

Mr. Larry Elliott

Director, Office of Compensation
Analysis and Support

National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health

4676 Columbia Parkway, C-46
Cincinnati, OH 45226

RE: HANFORD WORKERS BENEFITS: $150,000
JAN/2006 - TRI-CITY HERALD ARTICLE - COPY ENCLOSED
Dear Mr. Elliott:

My name is . I worked at the Hanford Area
from thru ~ and have developed a very serious and
debilitating lung disease from my exposure at the Hanford Area.
In fact, because of my exposure I am on Social Security
Disability and unable to work. My out of pocket medical costs
for 2004 were $15,000. My out of pocket medical costs for 2005
were $15,000. My personal savings from a lifetime of working
are being decimated.

Over the past several years I have gone to the meetings
regarding Hanford Employee Compensation and listened to all of
the wonderful hype. I have filled out form after form only to
be misidentified, misinformed, delayed and told I do not meet
the requirements set out by LAW. The answer to my pleas for
help, are precluded because it is the LAW. The DOE does not
deny that they caused the injury to my lungs, the DOE only
denies me compensation and medical care.

WOULD YOU PLEASE INVESTIGATE THIS AND GE ME SOME HELP?

Very truly yours

Enclosure: Tri-City Herald Article Titled:
Feds Eye Change in Hanford Claim Rules


Feds eye changes in
Hanford claim rules

The federal government is
considering new rules that may
make it easier for former Han-
ford workers with lyraphoma
cancers or their survivors to
receive benefits that include a
$150,000 payment.

If the rules are adopted, previ-
ously decided claims could be
reconsidered. The proposed
change was published Thursday
in the Federal Register, Public
comment will be accepted for
two weeks.

Comments may be mailed to
Larry Elliott, director, Office of
Compensation Analysis and
Support, National Institute for
Occupational Safety and
Health, 4676 Columbia
Parkway, C-46, Cincinnati,
Ohio 45226,
mune --

//200 é
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

February 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131994 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131994 

 COA: 259532 

Saginaw CC: 04-024226-FC 

TRUMON DONTAE CANNON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 25, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Saginaw County 

Prosecuting Attorney to answer Issue IV of the application for leave to appeal (answer 

whether OV 10 was correctly scored) within 28 days after the date of this order. The 

prosecutor shall particularly address how the circumstances of the case justify assessing 

points for predatory conduct, and address how, under the hierarchical scoring of OV 10 

from 5 to 15 points, the egregiousness of the conduct in this case exceeds, for example, 

the exploitation of a victim’s size or mental disability. 

The application for leave to appeal remains pending. 

p0130 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

February 2, 2007 

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7349

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAWAAD NASH, a/k/a Wad,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, 

Chief District Judge. (3:09-cr-00039-FDW-2; 3:12-cv-00283-FDW)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 23, 2015

Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jawaad Nash, Appellant Pro Se. William A. Brafford, Kelli Hamby 

Ferry, Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, North 

Carolina; Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jawaad Nash seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Nash has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.
3

Additionally, we construe Nash’s notice of appeal and 

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive 

§ 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 

(4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a 

successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on 

either:

(1) newly discovered evidence that . . . would be 

sufficient to establish by clear and convincing 

evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have 

found the movant guilty of the offense; or

(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive 

to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, 

that was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(h) (2012). Nash’s claims do not satisfy either 

of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a 

successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED