alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7903
DEBORAH GILL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-01158-JCC) Submitted: April 4, 2007 Decided: June 14, 2007 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Deborah Gill, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Deborah Gill, a state prisoner , seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gill has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                     OLYMPIC CASCADE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                     Basic

                                                              September 24, September 25,  September 26,
                                                                   1999         1998           1997
                                                              -----------   -----------    -----------
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>            <C>
Net income (loss) .........................................   $   118,000   ($4,666,000)   $   101,000
                                                              ===========   ===========    ===========
Weighted average number of common
      shares outstanding during the year ..................     1,563,499     1,496,634      1,195,403
                                                              ===========   ===========    ===========
Basic earnings per share ..................................   $      0.08   ($     3.12)   $      0.08
                                                              ===========   ===========    ===========
                                    Diluted

Weighted average number of common
     shares outstanding during the year ...................     1,563,499     1,496,634      1,195,403

Add common equivalent shares upon exercise of stock options             *             *        229,716
                                                              -----------   -----------    -----------
Weighted average number of shares used
     in calculation of primary earnings per share .........     1,563,499     1,496,634      1,425,119
                                                              ===========   ===========    ===========
Diluted earnings per share ................................   $      0.08   ($     3.12)   $      0.07
                                                              ===========   ===========    ===========
*    No effect  given to common  stock  equivalents,  as their  effect  would be
     anti-dilutive.
</TABLE>
**Exhibit23.10**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-46542, 333-112952, 333-114521, 333-115194, 333-126231, 333-132012 and 333-132737 on Form S-3, and Nos. 333-52514, 333-74339 and 333-128592 on Form S-8 of our report, dated July 19, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Isonics Corporation for the year ended April 30, 2006.

/s/ Hein & Associates LLP

Denver, Colorado

July 24, 2006

 

----
Exhibit 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the filing by Ametrine  Capital,  Inc. (the "Company") of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Lior Ostashinsky,  President and Treasurer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, that to my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 17 2009          By:   /s/ Lior Ostashinsky
                                    ---------------------------
                                        Lior Ostashinsky
                                        President and Treasurer (Principal
                                        Executive and Financial Officer)
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting of the 

Blockson Work Group 

June 28, 2016 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537
 

Participant Pass Code: 9933701
 

11:00 a.m. Eastern Time 

Welcome and roll-call

DISCUSSION 

	 Review and discuss all Findings (1-5) of the SC&A Review of the DCAS SEC 

Petition 00225 Evaluation Report addressing the residual contamination 

period (1960-1991) at the Blockson Chemical Company in Joliet Illinois. 

[See DCAS (1) and SC&A Reports (2)] 

	 Plans for any additional work and/or presentation at Advisory Board 

meeting in August. 

Adjourn
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RAY CHRIS MOBLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-203-RS-GRJ

BAY COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7). 

No objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. The case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief 

may be granted.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on January 27, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00203-RS-GRJ Document 8 Filed 01/27/12 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Tracy S. Clifford, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golf Trust of America, Inc.(the “Registrant”);

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)         Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| March 30, 2007 | /s/ TRACY S.  CLIFFORD         |
|---------------------|--------------------------------|
|                | **Tracy S. Clifford**          |
|                | *Principal Accounting Officer* |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5665 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5665

 To amend the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 to 
                  clarify the term labor organization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2018

Mr. Francis Rooney of Florida introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959 to 
                  clarify the term labor organization.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accountability for Represented 
Workers Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF THE TERM LABOR ORGANIZATION.

    Section 3 of the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 
1959 (29 U.S.C. 402) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (i)--
                    (A) by inserting ``(including any effort to discuss 
                or communicate with an employer the establishment of, 
                or changes to, particular terms and conditions of 
                employment, or to take any action to pressure an 
                employer into accepting the establishment of, or 
                changes to, such terms and conditions of employment)'' 
                after ``conditions of employment''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``(who may include any individual 
                who is an employee without regard to whether the labor 
                organization deals with the employer of such 
                individual)'' after ``employees''; and
            (2) in subsection (j)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (5) as 
                subparagraphs (A) through (E), respectively, and 
                indenting appropriately;
                    (B) by striking ``(j)'' and inserting ``(j) (1)''; 
                and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not be considered an exhaustive 
        list of the labor organizations that shall be deemed to be 
        engaged in an industry affecting commerce.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofNeohydro Technologies Corp.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Venugopal Rao Balla, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 13thday of August, 2008.

VENUGOPAL RAO BALLAVenugopal Rao BallaChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer














---
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1619-1630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-30]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[FDA No. 225-07-8004]


Memorandum of Understanding Between the Food and Drug 
Administration and Regents of the University of California

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of 
a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between FDA and

[[Page 1620]]

the University of California, Davis campus (UC Davis). The purpose of 
this MOU is to establish terms of collaboration between FDA and UC 
Davis, focused primarily but not exclusively, in the areas of the 
safety and security of foods and cosmetics, animal feeds and veterinary 
products. Beyond the collaborations in the traditional academic 
programs for training, research and outreach, this MOU will also 
include UC Davis extended partnerships such as the Western Institute 
for Food Safety and Security, and the Center for Produce Safety.

DATES: The agreement became effective December 7, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary I. Poos, Officeof the 
Commissioner, Office of the Chief Medical Officer (HF-40), Food and 
Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-
2825.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which 
states that all written agreements and MOUs between FDA and others 
shall be published in the Federal Register, the agency is publishing 
notice of this MOU.

    Dated: December 26, 2007.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S

[[Page 1621]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA08.005


[[Page 1622]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA08.006


[[Page 1623]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA08.007


[[Page 1624]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA08.008


[[Page 1625]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA08.009


[[Page 1626]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA08.010


[[Page 1627]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA08.011


[[Page 1628]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA08.012


[[Page 1629]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA08.013


[[Page 1630]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09JA08.014

[FR Doc. 08-30 Filed 1-8-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-C
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DO NALD OTIS WILLIAMS , A ppellant ,
v. Cas e No

. 5D 22

- 1199 LT Cas e No. 2 011- CF

- 105

STAT E OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decisio n filed December 6 , 2 022 3.850 A ppeal f rom th e Circuit Court for Lake County , H eidi D avis , Judge. D onald Otis Williams, Raiford , p ro se

. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, an d Douglas T

. S quire , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for

A ppellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, EDWARDS a nd EISNAUGLE , JJ. , c oncur.
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________
NO

. 09

- 1 4

- 00 077

- C R NO. 09

- 14

- 00078

- CR



### ____________________

CALVIN BERNARD JOHNSON , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 410 th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No s
. 12

- 04

- 04038 CR and 13

- 02

- 01314 CR

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 20, 2014, Calvin Bernard Johnson filed a notice of appeal of

two matters: the trial court order dated February 20, 2013, which granted the

State’s motion to dismiss his trial in cause number 12

- 04

- 04038 CR, and the trial

court’s judgment in cause number 13

- 02

- 01314 CR, for a sentence imposed on

February 20, 2013. The notice of appeal was filed too late to perfect the appeals

.

See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). W e notified the parties that the notice of appeal did2 not appear to have been timely filed, and we warned the parties that the appeals

would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless grounds were shown for

continuing the appeals. A response was due March 21, 2014, but no response has

been filed. We dismiss the appeals for lack o f jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P.

43.2(f).

APPEALS DISMISS ED.

________________________________ L EANNE JOHNSON Justice

Opinion Delivered March 26, 2014 Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE 
U.S. SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Leonardo Porciúncula Gomes Pereira, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, as amended by this Form 20-F/A, of Net Serviços de Comunicação S.A. (the Company); and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

| |        |  |                                       
| | ------ |  | --------------------------------------
| |        |  | Date: September 26, 2006              
| |        |  |                                       
| |        |  | /s/ Leonardo Porciúncula Gomes Pereira
| |        |  |                                       
| |        |  |                                       
| | Name:  |  | Leonardo Porciúncula Gomes Pereira    
| | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer               

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-5,496-17

IN RE RAYMOND L. CAVITT, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 1342490-D IN THE 174 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 174 District Court of Harris County, more than 35 days have elapsed, and the application has th

not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Harris

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order which designates issues to be

investigated (see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that
2

Relator has not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Harris County. Should the

response include an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was

served with the habeas application and that the 180-day time frame set out in TEX. R. APP. P.

73.4(b)(5) has not expired shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to

file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate

response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: December 11, 2019

Do not publish
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Roland C. Redd, the Chief Financial Officer of REMUDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 10th day of May, 2011.




/s/ Roland C. Redd

_________________________

Roland C. Redd

Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to REMUDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION and will be retained by REMUDA INVESTMENT CORPORATION and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 3:11-cr-00002-MCR Document 49 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 6Case 3:11-cr-00002-MCR Document 49 Filed 08/03/11 Page 2 of 6Case 3:11-cr-00002-MCR Document 49 Filed 08/03/11 Page 3 of 6Case 3:11-cr-00002-MCR Document 49 Filed 08/03/11 Page 4 of 6Case 3:11-cr-00002-MCR Document 49 Filed 08/03/11 Page 5 of 6Case 3:11-cr-00002-MCR Document 49 Filed 08/03/11 Page 6 of 6