alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.8


 


Summary Translation of Agreement with
Hangzhou Zaochuan Tech. Co., Ltd.


 


Note: Zhejiang Tantech Bamboo Technology Co.,
Ltd contracts from time to time with Hangzhou Zaochuan Tech Ltd. The summary below is from one of a series of agreements that the
companies use that constitute separate agreements, yet all such agreements are identical in all material respects.


 


Party A: Zhejiang Tantech Bamboo Technology
Co., Ltd


 


Party B: Hangzhou Zaochuan Tech Ltd.


 


Contract Expiration: 2012-01-01
till 2012-12-31


 


Sales
scope: Zhejiang Tantech Bamboo Technology Co., Ltd (“Company”) authorizes Hangzhou Zaochuan Tech Ltd. (“Party
B”) as a sales agent of “Charcoal Doctor” products; the distribution channel is circulation; Party B shall follow
the pricing offered by the Company; products shall be shipped upon receipt of funds/cash; minimum first order is 5000 yuan; before
the 8th day of each month, the Company shall mail the accounts receivable statement for the previous month to Party B. Party B
shall confirm and stamp the statement within three days upon receipt and mail it back to the Company for filing; Party B promises
its sales price won’t be lower than its purchase price from the Company. If there are no business transactions after 15
days of the effective date of the Agreement, the Agreement is terminated automatically.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-80,998-01

EX PARTE TYRELL A. JACKSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. C-371-009751-1041767-A IN THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault and sentenced to fourteen years’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Jackson v. State, No. 02-09-00258-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2010, no pet.). 

Applicant contends, among other things, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective

assistance. Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial

court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we grant Applicant

an out-of-time petition for discretionary review. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App.
2

1997). 

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Second Court of Appeals in case number 02-09-

00258-CR that affirmed his conviction in cause number 1041767D from the 371st District Court of

Tarrant County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30

days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1997).

Delivered: March 19, 2014

Do not publish
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, J. Bryant Kirkland III, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CDSI Holdings Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)  [intentionally omitted]  (c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d)  disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
 (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2005              /s/ J. Bryant Kirkland III   J. Bryant Kirkland III   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CITIZENS STATE BANK,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:10-CV-224-SPM/GRJ

DIXIE COUNTY,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Plaintiff’s Unopposed

Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

(doc. 7), filed December 3, 2010. The Court finds this request to be reasonable.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motion (doc. 7) is granted.

2. The Plaintiff shall have until December 17, 2010, to respond to the

Motion to Dismiss (doc. 5).

DONE AND ORDERED this seventh day of December, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 196 (Thursday, October 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 57946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Quality Workgroup 
Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 13th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Quality Workgroup in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

DATES: October 31, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern Time].

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue its discussion 
on how health information technology can provide the data needed for 
the development of quality measures that are useful to patients and 
others in the health care industry, automate the measurement and 
reporting of a comprehensive current and future set of quality 
measures, and accelerate the use of clinical decision support that can 
improve performance on those quality measures.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information; go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality/quality_instruct.html.

    Dated: October 1, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-5011 Filed 10-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
# C_2011121EN.01003701.xml

| 19.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/37

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 April 2011

2011/C 121/11

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4275 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,25 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4583 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87750 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9352 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2821 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7880 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,188 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,34 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9683 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0900 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1788 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3575 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3771 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1026 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8130 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7827 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 559,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8048 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3199 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3593 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 383,47 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3160 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,758 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3950 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,968 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2632 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7160 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,4520 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4275

JPY

Japanese yen

118,25

DKK

Danish krone

7,4583

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87750

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9352

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2821

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7880

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,188

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,34

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9683

RON

Romanian leu

4,0900

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1788

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3575

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3771

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1026

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8130

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7827

KRW

South Korean won

1 559,03

ZAR

South African rand

9,8048

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3199

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3593

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 383,47

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3160

PHP

Philippine peso

61,758

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3950

THB

Thai baht

42,968

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2632

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7160

INR

Indian rupee

63,4520

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 10.8

 

PROTEON THERAPEUTICS, INC.

200 West Street

Waltham, MA 02451

 

Dr. F. Nicholas Franano

1010 W. 69th Terrace

Kansas City, MO 64113

 

August 22, 2014

 

Re:                             Hourly Consulting Services

 

Dear Nick:

 

This letter sets forth the terms and conditions by which you agree to provide to Proteon Therapeutics, Inc. (“Proteon”) consulting services of a type and of such a scope as may be requested by Proteon from time to time having first given reasonable notice prior to the performance of the requested service; provided,  however,  that you shall not be obligated to provide more than ten (10) hours of consulting services to Proteon during any calendar week nor more than twenty five (25) hours of consulting services to Proteon during any calendar month. You shall be paid as an independent contractor, and not employee, for such services at a rate of $350 per hour, payable monthly in arrears within ten (10) calendar days after delivery by you to Proteon of a written invoice detailing such services on a daily basis.

 

This letter agreement may be terminated by either you or Proteon on thirty (30) days’ prior written notice.  You shall perform the consulting services at such location or locations and at such times as Proteon shall reasonably request; provided,  however,  that: (i) no travel outside of the Kansas City metropolitan area shall be required without at least three (3) business days’ prior written notice from Proteon, including the details of such travel, and then shall be subject to your prior commitments; (ii) Proteon shall pay the costs of all such travel, including payment or reimbursement of reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by you in connection therewith; (iii) travel arrangements for the you shall be made by Proteon at the same level of air service and hotel and other facilities as were provided to you during your employment with Proteon; (iv) you shall be paid the hourly rate for travel time and for a minimum of eight (8) working hours during each day you spend outside of the Kansas City metropolitan area at the request of Proteon pursuant hereto (or such greater number of hours as you actually work).

 

This letter agreement may not be modified or amended, and no breach shall be deemed to be waived, unless agreed to in writing by you and Proteon. This letter agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Missouri, without regard to the conflict of laws principles thereof.

 

[signature page follows]

 











 

	
Yours sincerely,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
PROTEON   THERAPEUTICS, INC.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Timothy P.   Noyes
    	
 
    
	
Name: Timothy P.   Noyes
    	
 
    
	
Title:   President & Chief Executive Officer
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Dr. F.   Nicholas Franano
    	
 
    
	
Dr. F.   Nicholas Franano
FY14 Q4 - EX 10.83






Exhibit 10.83
To:    Sasan Goodarzi, SVP and GM, Consumer Tax
From:    Brad Smith, President and CEO, Intuit Inc.
Date:    August 14, 2014
Re:     Commuting Allowance
__________________________________________________________________
In your continuing role as SVP and GM of the Consumer Tax group based in San Diego, California, we appreciate that you will be required to incur additional expenses for travel and accommodations.  We understand that it is inconvenient to relocate your family at this time and therefore you will maintain your home in Los Gatos, California while performing this job.  In order to offset those additional costs, the company will provide you with an expense allowance for those costs that you incur during the company’s 2015 fiscal year.  This amount will be $218,304.
This amount will be paid to you in four installments during the course of the year.   A payment in the amount of $54,576 will be made in each of the months of August 2014, November 2014, February 2015 and May 2015, provided that you are continuing to act in this role at the time of payment.  These amounts will be treated as taxable income to you.  The company will expect you to cover the costs of transportation between your home and your primary job location as well as accommodations and local transportation close to your primary job location while you are away from home out of this amount.  Other than this amount, the company will not reimburse you for any expenses of this type that you incur during the company’s 2015 fiscal year, except that if for any reason you cease to act in this role during the fiscal year (other than on account of your voluntary departure), the company will pay for the cost of any housing lease for any period for which you have not yet received an installment through July 31, 2015.  The company will evaluate during the 2015 fiscal year whether or not to continue this allowance in a future fiscal year.
We wish to reiterate how much the company appreciates your willingness to take on these new responsibilities despite the personal sacrifices that they require from you and your family.  We hope that assisting you financially with these additional expenses makes those sacrifices easier to shoulder.
# C_2011075EN.01000102.xml

| 9.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6135 — Carlyle/Administratiekantoor Alpinvest/Alpinvest)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 75/02

On 2 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6135. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6135. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6751

SAMUEL DEWITT MCCOTTER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIE SCOTT,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-76-5-BO)

Submitted: November 10, 1998 Decided: November 30, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Dewitt McCotter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Dewitt McCotter seeks to appeal the district court’s

order properly construing his motion as one filed under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and dismissing it. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. McCotter also seeks review of the transfer of his motion

from the Northern District of Georgia to the Eastern District of

North Carolina. We are without jurisdiction to consider a transfer

order entered by a district court not within our territorial jurisdiction. See Linnell v. Sloan, 636 F.2d 65, 67 (4th Cir. 1980);

Preston Corp. v. Raese, 335 F.2d 827, 828 (4th Cir. 1964). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. McCotter v. Scott,

No. CA-98-76-5-BO (E.D.N.C. May 8, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 of Auburn Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rachel A. Haines, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




The foregoing certification shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.




Date: May 14, 2010

/s/ Rachel A. HainesName: Rachel A. HainesTitle:   Senior Vice President and Treasurer

(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORP., 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-32/RS-CJK

FAYE JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

UORDER

From the pleadings, it appears that common questions of law or fact are involved 

in the five trademark infringement suits filed in this Court: Slep-Tone Entertainment 

Corp. v. David Morgan, et al., Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. Kara-O-King Inc., et 

al., Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. Faye Johnson, et al., Slep-Tone Entertainment 

Corp. v. Arther Allen, et al., and Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. Tequila Mexico of 

Pensacola Inc., et al. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42 (a) (2), and with the consent of Chief 

Judge Casey Rodgers and Senior Judge Stephan Mickle, the five cases shall be 

consolidated and assigned to me. In addition, pursuant to Fla. N.D. Loc. R. 3.1(C), the 

venue for the Pensacola and Gainesville cases shall be transferred to the Panama City 

division. 

Case 5:11-cv-00069-RS-EMT Document 57 Filed 08/29/11 Page 1 of 2
IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Clerk shall consolidate cases 1:10cv27-SPM/GRJ, 5:10cv71-RS/CJK, 

5:11cv32-RS/CJK, 5:11cv69-RS/EMT, and 3:11cv191-MCR/EMT. 

2. The Clerk shall file a copy of this Order in each of these cases. 

3. All future pleadings should be filed only in case 5:11cv32-RS/CJK. 

4. The Motion to Set Aside the Scheduling Order (Doc. 29) in 5:11cv69 is 

GRANTED. A new scheduling order will be forthcoming for the consolidated 

cases. 

ORDERED on August 29, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00069-RS-EMT Document 57 Filed 08/29/11 Page 2 of 2