alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5589 

To consolidate certain small diplomatic and consular posts, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2018 

Mr. MCCAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To consolidate certain small diplomatic and consular posts, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Examine Overseas 

5 Diplomatic Footprint Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONSOLIDATION OF SMALL DIPLOMATIC AND CON7 SULAR POSTS. 

8 (a) NEW EMBASSIES AND CONSULATES.—Prior to 

9 initiating site selection for a diplomatic or consular post 

10 that is expected to employ ten or fewer direct hire United 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5589 IH

1 States Government employees on average for at least three 

2 years after opening, the Secretary of State shall conduct 

3 an analysis of options, including consolidating such pro4 posed post with other nearby diplomatic or consular posts. 

5 (b) NOTIFICATION.—Not later than 30 days after 

6 conducting an analysis of options pursuant to subsection 

7 (a), the Secretary of State shall notify the appropriate 

8 congressional committees of the results of such analysis. 

9 (c) EXISTING SMALL DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR

10 POSTS.—The Secretary of State shall complete a cost-ben11 efit analysis for maintaining each diplomatic and consular 

12 post that has employed ten or fewer direct hire United 

13 States Government employees on average over the three 

14 years prior to the date of the enactment of this Act. Each 

15 such analysis shall include, at minimum, the following: 

16 (1) The full cost of maintaining each such post. 

17 (2) Any policy value or other value that United 

18 States Government tenants derive from each such 

19 post. 

20 (3) Whether regular consular services, including 

21 United States citizen services, are provided at each 

22 such post. 

23 (4) The nearest alternative location at which 

24 regular consular services, including United States 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5589 IH

1 citizen services, are available with respect to each 

2 such post. 

3 (5) Input from each such post regarding any 

4 unique operational or policy value such post pro5 vides. 

6 (d) REPORT.—Not later than one year after the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall 

8 submit to the appropriate congressional committees a re9 port on the results of the analyses under subsections (a) 

10 and (c). 

11 (e) APPROPRIATE CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEES DE12 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate congres13 sional committees’’ means— 

14 (1) in the House of Representatives— 

15 (A) the Committee on Foreign Affairs; and 

16 (B) the Committee on Appropriations; and 

17 (2) in the Senate— 

18 (A) the Committee on Foreign Relations; 

19 and 

20 (B) the Committee on Appropriations. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00060-MP-GRJ

WILLIAM J DICKERT,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Pursuant to the Court’s October 31, 2012 Order, doc. 33, a final pretrial

conference was scheduled for April 9, 2012. Because there is a motion for summary

judgment pending before the Court as well as other motions relating to discovery the

final pretrial conference on April 9, 2012 is cancelled and will be reset, if necessary, by

separate notice after the pending motions are resolved. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 30 day of March, 2012. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00060-MP-GRJ Document 62 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011141EN.01000901.xml

| 12.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/9 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to open winding-up proceedings in respect of Western International Insurance Company (Europe) Limited

(Publication made in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

2011/C 141/09

| Insurance undertaking | Western International Insurance Company (Europe) Limited c/o McStay Luby Chartered Accountants Dargan House 21-23 Fenian Street Dublin 2 IRELAND | Western International Insurance Company (Europe) Limited | c/o McStay Luby Chartered Accountants | Dargan House | 21-23 Fenian Street | Dublin 2 | IRELAND |
| -------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------- | ------------ | ------------------- | -------- | ------- |
| Western International Insurance Company (Europe) Limited | | | | | | | |
| c/o McStay Luby Chartered Accountants | | | | | | | |
| Dargan House | | | | | | | |
| 21-23 Fenian Street | | | | | | | |
| Dublin 2 | | | | | | | |
| IRELAND | | | | | | | |
| Date, entry into force and nature of the decision | Date of commencement of liquidation is 5 October 2006.
The liquidator was appointed following a resolution passed at an extraordinary general meeting of the member of the Company on 5 October 2006. | | | | | | |
| Competent authorities | This is a members voluntary liquidation. All admitted creditors have been or will be paid in full.
There is no competent authority as defined by Section 2(1) of S.I. No 168/2003 European Communities (reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings) Regulations 2003 | | | | | | |
| Supervisory authority | The Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Innovation 23 Kildare Street Dublin 2 IRELAND | The Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Innovation | 23 Kildare Street | Dublin 2 | IRELAND | | |
| The Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Innovation | | | | | | | |
| 23 Kildare Street | | | | | | | |
| Dublin 2 | | | | | | | |
| IRELAND | | | | | | | |
| Liquidator appointed | Tom Rogers, Liquidator McStay Luby Chartered Accountants Dargan House 21-23 Fenian Street Dublin 2 IRELAND | Tom Rogers, Liquidator | McStay Luby Chartered Accountants | Dargan House | 21-23 Fenian Street | Dublin 2 | IRELAND |
| Tom Rogers, Liquidator | | | | | | | |
| McStay Luby Chartered Accountants | | | | | | | |
| Dargan House | | | | | | | |
| 21-23 Fenian Street | | | | | | | |
| Dublin 2 | | | | | | | |
| IRELAND | | | | | | | |
| Applicable law | Companies Acts 1963-2001 | | | | | | |

---
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


ECHO GLOBAL LOGISTICS, INC.


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 Of THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Douglas R. Waggoner, certify that:


1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Echo Global Logistics, Inc.;


2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;


3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:


a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and


c)   disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and


b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date:November 8, 2010/s/ DOUGLAS R. WAGGONERDouglas R. WaggonerChief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

GARY W. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:11-cv-100-RS-EMT

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Report of Mediator (Doc. 17). Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 16.2(D), 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed from the active docket of the court.

2. In the event that the settlement between these parties is not consummated, the 

Court reserves jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within 60 days of 

the date of this Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and 

reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file for administrative purposes, and upon the 

expiration of 60 days without activity, the clerk is directed to close the case in 

its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on August 18, 2011.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00100-RS-EMT Document 18 Filed 08/18/11 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 26, 2018

d0419

Order 

Clerk

April 26, 2018

155582

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 155582

COA: 336132

Kent CC: 01-008625-FC

RAMON LEE BRYANT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 17, 2017 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          13,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,181
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,453
<PP&E>                                          21,879
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,262
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,948
<BONDS>                                         32,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,130
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,754
<SALES>                                          3,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                76,509
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   60,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,194
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,599
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,716
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,163)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,879
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,879
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.96
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending July 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jackson Y. Dott, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Date: September 8, 2006

/s/   Jackson Y. Dott
------------------------
Jackson Y. Dott
Chief Executive Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 22, 2015

p0519

Order 

Clerk

May 22, 2015

149671

_________________________________________

In re FILIBECK Estate.

_________________________________________

HEIDI J. FILIBECK, Personal Representative of 

the ESTATE of STEPHEN J. FILIBECK,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149671

COA: 315107

Menominee PC: 2011-000065-CZ

LAURA J. BEAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this appeal is considered, and the appeal is DISMISSED with 

prejudice and without costs. The request for a ruling notwithstanding the stipulation to 

dismiss is DENIED.
EXHIBIT 31.1
     RULE 13a-14(a)
CERTIFICATION
    I, Louis O. Davis, Jr.,
certify that:
    1.        
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunshine Financial, Inc
(the “Company”);
 2.        
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.        
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
 4.        
The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:
  (a)  designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)  evaluated the
effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluations; and
  (c)  disclosed in
this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.        
The Company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s
auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)  all significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
  (b)  any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.








September
      25, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Louis
      O. Davis, Jr.Louis
      O. Davis, Jr.President
      and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Change in meeting location to California. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 12th meeting of the American Health Information Community in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.). The American Health Information Community will advise the Secretary and recommend specific actions to achieve a common interoperability framework for health information technology (IT).

# DATES:

March 13, 2007, from 8 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. (Pacific time).

# New Address:

Computer History Museum, 1401 N. Shoreline Boulevard, Mountain View, California 94043.

# For Further Information:

                        Visit                         *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic.html*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting will include presentations by the Quality Workgroup; Population Health/Clinical Care Connections Workgroup; Consumer Empowerment Workgroup; and Confidentiality, Privacy and Security Workgroup. It will also feature a panel presentation on Privacy and Security issues.

                    The general public is invited to participate in person at the Computer History Museum in Mountain View, CA. Alternatively, the public may participate remotely via the Web. The Community meeting will be available on the NIH Web site at:                     *http://www.videocast.nih.gov/​*.                

If you have special needs for the meeting, please contact (202) 690-7151.

Dated: February 21, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-914 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
NUMBER 13-15-00373-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

CUPERTINO RESENDEZ ZUNIGA, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 430th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, the State of Texas, by and through its Criminal District Attorney, the 

Honorable Ricardo Rodriguez Jr., has filed a motion for dismissal of its appeal on grounds 

that the appeal has been rendered moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). No decision of 

this Court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 
2

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

2nd day of September, 2015.