alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State v. Grantz, 2014-Ohio-4127.]

 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

 TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO 

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION

 Plaintiff-Appellee, :

 -vs- : CASE NO. 2014-T-0046 

 

JOHN C. GRANTZ, :

 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

Criminal Appeal from the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2013 

CR 00665. 

Judgment: Appeal dismissed. 

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, and LuWayne Annos, Assistant 

Prosecutor, Administration Building, Fourth Floor, 160 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH 

44481-1092 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). 

Michael A. Partlow, 112 South Water Street, Suite C., Kent, OH 44240 (For 

Defendant-Appellant). 

COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J., 

{¶1} On June 11, 2014, appellant, John C. Grantz, filed his notice of appeal, 

pro se, from a January 2, 2014 judgment entry issued by the Trumbull County Court of 

Common Pleas. On July 18, 2014, the trial court appointed Attorney Michael A. Partlow 

to represent appellant in this appeal. 

{¶2} On June 12, 2014, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant 

to Loc.R. 3(D)(3) for failure to attach a copy of the judgment entry being appealed and, 

pursuant to App.R. 4(A), for the notice of appeal being untimely filed. 
2

{¶3} No brief or response in opposition to the motion has been filed 

{¶4} App.R. 4(A) states in part: 

{¶5} “A party shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within thirty 

days of the later of entry of the judgment or order appealed. * * *” 

{¶6} In this case, appellant’s notice of appeal was due by February 3, 2014, 

which was not a holiday or a weekend. Since appellant’s notice of appeal was not filed 

until June 11, 2014, the appeal is untimely by approximately four months. 

{¶7} App.R. 5(A) states, in relevant part: 

{¶8} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for 

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with 

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases: 

{¶9} “(a) Criminal proceedings; 

{¶10} “(b) Delinquency proceedings; and 

{¶11} “(c) Serious youthful offender proceedings. 

{¶12} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals 

and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of 

right. Concurrently with the filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the 

trial court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of 

the notice of the appeal in the court of appeals. * * *” 

{¶13} In the present case, appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule 

set forth in App.R. 4(A) nor sought leave to appeal. Thus, this court is without 

jurisdiction to consider the appeal. Appellant has a remedy under App.R. 5(A) to file an 

untimely appeal from a criminal judgment. 
3

{¶14} Based upon the foregoing analysis, appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby 

granted, and the appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed as being untimely. 

{¶15} Appeal dismissed. 

DIANE V. GRENDELL, J., 

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J., concur.
Exhibit 23. Consents of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement No.
001-12233 on Form 10-KSB/A of our report dated June 14, 2005, (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to the emphasis of matter described in Note 2) relating to the financial
statements of Bexil Corporation, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A
of Bexil Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, NJ
June 14, 2005
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 5:11cv184-RH/EMT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

APRILLE VANICK,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv184-RH/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 31. No objections have been filed. Upon 

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees, ECF No. 25, is GRANTED. 

The Secretary must pay $4,000 as attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice 

Act.

SO ORDERED on November 12, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Reid Stone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Reid Stone Reid Stone Title: Chief Financial Officer   February 16, 2010
#### Elizabeth Jane Anderson *v.*City of Hinton, W. Va., *etc.*

(No. 14063)

Decided April 7, 1978.

*David L. Ziegler*for appellant

No appearance for appellee.

Per Curiam:

By order entered December 21, 1976, the Circuit Court of Summers County dismissed the plaintiff’s personal injury action because the plaintiff had failed to comply with the provisions of *W.Va. Code,*8-12-20, requiring that notice of a claim against a municipality be filed within thirty days after a cause of action accrues.

The plaintiff, Elizabeth Jane Anderson, filed this appeal contending, among other points, that *W.Va. Code,*8-12-20, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

This Court, before the maturation of this appeal, announced its decision in the consolidated cases of *O’Neil and Hendrickson v. City of*Parkersburg,_W. Va._, *506237 S.E.2d 504 (1977). Syllabus Point 2 of the *O’Neil*case states:

> “The notice of claim provision provided for in *W.Va. Code,*8-12-20, as enacted by the legislature in 1969, is violative of the equal protection and due process clauses of our state and federal constitutions and is unconstitutional.”

The *O’Neil*decision governs the resolution of the issue raised by the plaintiff in this appeal.

The judgment of the Circuit Court of Summers County is, therefore, reversed, and the case is remanded for trial.

*Reversed and remanded.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

NANCY CUSSON,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:11-CV-86-SPM/GRJ

NEWBERRY SC COMPANY LTD.,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Plaintiff’s Second

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond (doc. 16) to Defendant’s

Motion for More Definite Statement (doc. 12). The Court finds this request to be

reasonable. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motion (doc. 14) is granted.

2. The Plaintiff shall have until July 25, 2011, to respond to the Motion

for More Definite Statement.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-second day of July, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00086-SPM-GRJ Document 19 Filed 07/22/11 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, January 30, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, January 30, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0269. MICHAEL MARKSBERRY v. MARIANN MARKSBERRY. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 15A08390
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JUDY BAGGETT,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv447/MCR/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This action was initiated under the Social Security Act to obtain judicial review of

Defendant’s final decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits (Doc. 1). Now before the

court is Defendant’s Motion to Remand pursuant to sentence four of Title 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc.

16). Defendant has certified that Plaintiff has no objection to this motion (id. at 1).

Sentence four of section 405(g) states that “[t]he court shall have power to enter, upon the

pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision

of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” 42

U.S.C. § 405(g). In the instant case, the Commissioner states that remand is appropriate to enable

an Administrative Law Judge to “obtain [a] missing exhibit” and “offer Plaintiff a supplemental

hearing, take any further action necessary to complete the administrative record, and issue a new

decision.” (Doc. 16-1 at 1). Based upon the foregoing, this court concludes that good cause has been

shown for remand.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That Defendant’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 16) be GRANTED and the

Commissioner’s decision denying benefits be REVERSED.

Case 3:10-cv-00447-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 05/03/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. That this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. That Defendant be ordered to conduct proceedings in accordance with this Report

and Recommendation.

4. That the clerk be directed to enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure.

5. That the clerk be directed to close this file. 

At Pensacola, Florida, this 3rd day of May 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

 ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A copy of

objections shall be served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object

may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States

v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No.: 3:10cv447/'MCR/EMT

Case 3:10-cv-00447-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 05/03/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011004EN.01000201.xml

| 7.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.5969 — SCJ/Sara Lee)

(COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 4/02

On 22 December 2010, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301 / 2967244) or by post, under reference COMP/M.5969 — SCJ/Sara Lee, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report
of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date therein specified (the Report), the undersigned, Michael W. Levin, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Michael W. Levin 
Michael W. Levin
Chief Executive OfficerSeptember 28, 2006

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Presidential Documents

9431 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 40 

Thursday, March 1, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8107 of February 26, 2007 

Irish-American Heritage Month, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

The friendship between Ireland and the United States has deep roots, and 

Irish Americans have played an integral role in making our country a place 

of hope and opportunity. During Irish-American Heritage Month, we recognize the vital contributions of Irish Americans to our Nation. 

Since our founding, Irish immigrants have come to America’s shores in 

search of better lives. Today, millions of American citizens are of Irish 

descent, and they and their forbearers have helped shape our way of life, 

strengthened our economy, and contributed to the arts, and protected our 

Nation. Irish Americans have shown their devotion to our country by serving 

in our Armed Forces. America is especially grateful to these brave men 

and women for the sacrifices that have helped preserve the ideals of our 

country and made the world a safer place. 

During the month of March, we reflect on our Nation’s past and how 

Irish Americans helped create the country we live in today. America is 

a melting pot of cultures, and Irish-American Heritage Month is an opportunity to celebrate the accomplishments of Irish-American citizens and remind our people we are blessed to be a Nation of immigrants. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 2007 as IrishAmerican Heritage Month. I call upon all Americans to observe this month 

by celebrating the contributions of Irish Americans to our Nation. 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with MISCELLANEOUS
9432 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-sixth 

day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtyfirst. 

[FR Doc. 07–984 

Filed 2–28–07; 9:35 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
# Irish-American Heritage Month, 2007

The friendship between Ireland and the United States has deep roots, and Irish Americans have played an integral role in making our country a place of hope and opportunity. During Irish-American Heritage Month, we recognize the vital contributions of Irish Americans to our Nation.

Since our founding, Irish immigrants have come to America's shores in search of better lives.  Today, millions of American citizens are of Irish descent, and they and their forbearers have helped shape our way of life, strengthened our economy, and contributed to the arts, and protected our Nation.  Irish Americans have shown their devotion to our country by serving in our Armed Forces.  America is especially grateful to these brave men and women for the sacrifices that have helped preserve the ideals of our country and made the world a safer place.

During the month of March, we reflect on our Nation's past and how Irish Americans helped create the country we live in today.  America is a melting pot of cultures, and Irish-American Heritage Month is an opportunity to celebrate the accomplishments of Irish-American citizens and remind our people we are blessed to be a Nation of immigrants.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim March 2007 as Irish-American Heritage Month.  I call upon all Americans to observe this month by celebrating the contributions of Irish Americans to our Nation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-sixth day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first.

[FR Doc. 07-984

Billing code 3195-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolfe Creek Mining, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kristen Paul, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
3rd day of November, 2009.


/s/ Kristen Paul
-----------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
1

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-4031

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Alberto Torres, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 5, 2006

Filed: January 20, 2006 

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Alberto Torres pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with

intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court1

 sentenced him to 210 months’ imprisonment and

5 years’ supervised release. Torres did not appeal. The government later filed a

motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) to reduce the sentence.

The district court granted the motion and reduced Torres’s sentence to 120 months’

imprisonment and 5 years’ supervised release.
-2-

On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In pro se submissions, Torres claims ineffective

assistance of counsel, but any such claim should be raised in a motion pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v. Lee, 374 F.3d 637, 654 (8th Cir. 2004), cert.

denied, 125 S. Ct. 2962 (2005). Having reviewed the record independently under

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and deny

Torres’s request for new appellate counsel. 

______________________________
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 12, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13229-13230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1023]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

[[Page 13230]]


Date and Time: Monday, March 17, 2008, 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

Place: Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of 
the EEOC Office Building, 1801 ``L'' Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.

Status: The meeting will be open to the public.

Matters To Be Considered: Open Session
    1. Announcement of Notation Votes.
    2. Proposed Renewal of UGESP Authorization under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act.

    Note: In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be 
open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and 
voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission 
meetings in the Federal Register, the Commission also provides a 
recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission 
sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing 
impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by 
using the voice and TTY numbers listed above.

Contact Person for More Information: Stephen Llewellyn, Executive 
Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: This Notice Issued March 10, 2008.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 08-1023 Filed 3-10-08; 2:45 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cr69-SPM

CARL WAYNE ZEIDERS,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER OF REFERENCE

The court has been informed that the defendant in the above styled case

wishes to enter a guilty plea and consents to having the guilty plea proceedings

conducted by a United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to the provisions of 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(3) and Loc. R. 72.3, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above captioned criminal case be referred to the

Honorable William C. Sherrill, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct all

of the proceedings required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal

Procedure incident to a guilty plea and to make a recommendation to the District

Judge concerning acceptance or rejection of the guilty plea.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of October, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge