alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>  



PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO. 207 DATED                      Filed Pursuant to
March 7, 1996 TO PROSPECTUS DATED                     Rule 424(b)(5)
March 29, 1994 AS AMENDED BY PROSPECTUS               File No. 33-51877
DATED October 14, 1995


                          CMS ENERGY CORPORATION

    General Term Notes (servicemark of J.W. Korth & Company), Series A
                Due 9 Months to 25 Years from date of issue

       Except as set forth herein, the General Term Notes (servicemark of
J.W. Korth & Company) offered hereby (the "Notes") have such terms as are
described in the accompanying Prospectus dated October 14, 1995.

Aggregate Principal Amount:               $ 43,000.00       
Original Issue Date (Settlement Date)      March 12, 1996   
Stated Maturity Date:                      December 15, 1998
Issue Price to Public:                    100.00% of Principal Amount
Interest Rate:                            6.250% Per Annum
Interest Payment Dates:                   June 15 and December 15 and
                                          semi-annually thereafter
                                          Commencing June 15, 1996
Survivor's Option:                        [ X ] Yes   [   ] No
Optional Redemption:                      [   ] Yes   [ X ] No

       Agent                              Principal Amount of Notes
                                           Solicited by Each Agent
Prudential Securities Incorporated        $ 40,000.00       
EVEREN Securities, Inc.                   $      0.00       
First of Michigan Corporation             $      0.00       
Roney & Co.                               $  3,000.00       
J.W. Korth & Company                      $      0.00       
       Total                              $ 43,000.00       

                                            Per Note
                                          Sold by Agents
                                           To Public          Total

Issue Price:                              $1,000.00         $ 43,000.00  
Agent's Discount or Commission:           $    5.00         $    215.00  
Maximum Dealer's Discount or
  Selling Concession:                     $   10.50         $    451.50  
Proceeds to the Company:                  $  984.50         $ 42,333.50  

CUSIP Number:   12589QJV9   
<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted**

**pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Kathy Ordoñez, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the quarterlyreport of Celera Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 25, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Celera Corporation. 

Date: November 4, 2010 

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Presidential Documents

26311 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 90 

Thursday, May 8, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8252 of May 5, 2008 

Military Spouse Day, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Military spouses embody the courage, nobility of duty, and love of country 

that inspire every American. On Military Spouse Day, we pay tribute to 

the husbands and wives who support their spouses in America’s Armed 

Forces during times of war and peace. 

The legacy of military spouses began when colonial Americans were fighting 

for independence. Martha Washington boosted the morale of her husband’s 

troops by visiting battlefields and tending to the wounded. Since then, 

members of our Armed Forces have served our Nation accompanied by 

the steadfast love and support of their spouses and families. 

While our men and women in uniform are protecting our country’s founding 

ideals of liberty, democracy, and justice, their spouses live with uncommon 

challenges, endure sleepless nights, and spend long periods raising children 

alone. Many military spouses are also committed volunteers, serving other 

military families and local communities. Our Nation benefits from the sacrifices of our military families, and we are inspired by their courage, strength, 

and leadership. 

On Military Spouse Day and throughout the year, we honor the commitment 

spouses have made to freedom’s cause. To learn about ways to support 

our troops and their spouses and families, I encourage all Americans to 

visit www.americasupportsyou.mil. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim May 9, 2008, as Military 

Spouse Day. I call upon the people of the United States to observe this 

day with appropriate ceremonies and activities and by expressing their 

gratitude to the husbands and wives of those serving in the United States 

Armed Forces. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with MISCELLANEOUS
26312 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 90 / Thursday, May 8, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fifth day of 

May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 08–1240 

Filed 5–7–08; 9:13 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT (10)(xi)




LEASE ADDENDUM




PARKWAY CENTER









This is an Addendum to the Lease as of November 12th, 2010, between REEF PARKWAY, LLC a Washington limited liability company, as Landlord, and ACTIVECARE, INC. as Tenant for premises located at 4897 Lake Park Blvd, Salt Lake City, Utah.






The following terms are hereby incorporated as part of the Lease, and to the extent these terms modify or conflict with any provisions of the Lease, these terms shall control.  All other terms of the Lease not modified shall remain the same:






Tenant shall be permitted early access to the space for set-up purposes upon Landlords receipt of a signed lease, insurance certificate that meets the requirements of the lease, pre-paid rent and security deposit checks equal to the amounts specified in the lease.  Once these items are received by Landlord’s agent, Tenant will be granted a key to the space.  Landlord retains the right of access to the premises during the early access period.  Tenant understands that all furniture in the space is not owned by the Landlord but the Landlord is making its best efforts (has extended a cash offer) to purchase from the Tenant who formerly occupied the space.  In the event that Landlord is not able to purchase the furniture it shall be removed from the space before the premises are officially delivered to Tenant in the condition required by the lease.






Agreed and Accepted:




TENANT: ACTIVECARE, INC.




BY Michael Acton




ITSCFO




Date:  November 15th, 2010









Landlord: REEF PARKWAY, LLC




By: Washington Capital Management, Inc.




Its: Manager




BYJenny Gage




ITSAsset Manager




DATE       November 16th, 2010
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1900

___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Jason Lee Kirtley,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph

 ____________

 Submitted: April 25, 2019 

Filed: May 3, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, WOLLMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Jason Kirtley directly appeals the sentence the district court imposed after he 1

pleaded guilty to a drug offense, pursuant to plea agreement containing an appeal

The Honorable Greg Kays, United States District Judge for the Western

1

District of Missouri.
waiver. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the sentence as substantively

unreasonable. Kirtley has moved for appointment of new counsel.

We will enforce the appeal waiver in this case because Kirtley entered into the

plea agreement and the appeal waiver knowingly and voluntarily, his challenge to the

sentence falls within the scope of the appeal waiver, and no miscarriage of justice

would result fromenforcing the waiver. See United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704

(8th Cir. 2010); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en

banc). Further, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal outside the

scope of the appeal waiver. 

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, deny as moot Kirtley’s

pending motion, and dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This 23rdday of March, 2005.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ John L. Coleman          
|Chief Executive Officer      
|First Georgia Community Corp.
|                             
|/s/ Elaine Kendrick          
|Chief Financial Officer      
|First Georgia Community Corp.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION 

BERNARD PARKS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No.: 5:11-cv-117-SPM-GRJ

FRANK MCKEITHEN, et al,

Defendants. 

____________________________/ 

O R D E R 

Plaintiff, an inmate confined in the Bay County Jail, initiated this case by filing a

pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1983 (Doc. 1) and a motion for leave

to proceed as a pauper (Doc. 2). The Complaint is deficient in that Plaintiff failed to

fully complete all pages of the Court’s civil rights complaint form. Further, Plaintiff failed

to provide a complete financial certificate and inmate account statement in support of

his motion for leave to proceed as a pauper. Plaintiff states that he requires the Court’s

assistance in obtaining complete financial information from jail officials. The Court will

defer further review of Plaintiff’s claims pending correction of these deficiencies. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint, completing the complaint form in

full. The Clerk has provided Plaintiff with additional blank complaint forms.

Plaintiff shall file the Amended Complaint, with a service copy for each

Defendant, on or before June 16, 2011.

2. A ruling on Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed as a pauper, Doc. 2, is

DEFERRED pending receipt of completed financial information, which must be

filed with the Court on or before June 16, 2011. The Clerk is directed to mail a

copy of this Order to the Custodian of Inmate Accounts, Bay County Jail, 5700

Star Lane, Panama City, Florida 32404. However, Plaintiff bears the ultimate

Case 5:11-cv-00117-SPM-GRJ Document 5 Filed 05/17/11 Page 1 of 2
responsibility of complying with the requirements of 28 U.S.C § 1915.

3. Failure to comply with this Order as directed will result in a recommendation

that this case be dismissed without further notice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17 day of May 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:11-cv-00117-SPM-GRJ Document 5 Filed 05/17/11 Page 2 of 2
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

HILLCREST LABORATORIES, INC.,

Appellant

v.

MOVEA, INC.,

Appellee

______________________ 

2016-1738

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,036.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JAMES R. BARNEY, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, 

Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for 

appellant. Also represented by RAJEEV GUPTA, KARTHIK 

KUMAR.

PIERRE YANNEY, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, 

New York, NY, argued for appellee. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (REYNA, MAYER, and HUGHES, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 April 6, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5349 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1325 Autumn Avenue in Memphis, Tennessee, 

as the ‘‘Judge Russell B. Sugarmon Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5349 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. JUDGE RUSSELL B. SUGARMON POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1325 Autumn Avenue in Mem5 phis, Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Judge Russell B. Sugarmon Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Judge Russell B. 

11 Sugarmon Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.2

                     CONTRACT FOR THE SALE OF GOODS JV2 1\1

Nicosia, Cyprus                                                December, 1, 2013

     BETWEEN: BETAFOX CORP, represented by Director Giorgos Kallides (the
"Seller")

     AND: HOME AND BEYOND (the "Buyer"), represented by Director Mark Kostandi
(the "Buyer") have concluded the present Contract as follows:

1. SALE OF GOODS
Seller shall sell, to buyer the following goods:

MULTI-COLORED CANDLES WITH COLORED FLAMES IN ASSORTMENT

No party under the agreement is obligated to purchase or sell a certain minimum
number of goods or dollar amount.

The range of products for delivery of each batch is defined in the invoice.

2. CONSIDERATION
Buyer shall accept the goods and pay the sum for the goods.

3. IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
Identification of the goods to this agreement shall not be deemed to have been
made until both buyer and seller have specified that the goods in question are
to be appropriated to the performance of this agreement.

4. PAYMENT ON RECEIPT
Buyer shall make payment for the goods at the time when, and at the place where,
the goods are received by buyer.

5. RISK OF LOSS
The risk of loss from any casualty to the goods, regardless of the cause, shall
be on seller until the goods have been accepted by buyer.

6. WARRANTY OF NO ENCUMBRANCES
Seller warrants that the goods are now free, and that at the time of delivery
shall be free from any security interest or other lien or encumbrance.

7. WARRANTY OF TITLE
Furthermore, seller warrants that at the time of signing this agreement seller
neither knows, nor has reason to know, of the existence of any outstanding title
or claim of title hostile to the rights of seller in the goods.
<PAGE>
8. RIGHT OF INSPECTION
Buyer shall have the right to inspect the goods on arrival and, within 10
business days after delivery, buyer must give notice to seller of any claim for
damages on account of condition, quality or grade of the goods, and buyer must
specify the basis of the claim of buyer in detail. The failure of buyer to
comply with these conditions shall constitute irrevocable acceptance of the
goods by buyer.

The parties have executed this agreement at Cyprus, December, 01, 2013 year This
Contract is concluded and enters into force upon signature by the Parties.

SELLER


Director Giorgos Kallides              /s/ Giorgos Kallides
                                       -----------------------------------

BUYER


Director Mark Kostandi                 /s/ Mark Kostandi
                                       -----------------------------------
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Meeting of the SEC Issues Work Group

September 26, 2013

9:00 a.m. EDT

Taft Building, DCAS Conference Rm.

4676 Columbia Parkway,

Cincinnati, OH 45226

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537 Participant Pass Code: 9933701 

Welcome and roll-call/introductions 

Work Group Discussion 

• NIOSH Response (8/21/2013) to SC&A Review of Co-worker Dose Modeling (ORAUT Rpt 0053)

• WG Discussion

• WG & October ABRWH Meeting Session Plans

Adjourn
EXHIBIT 4.8.1



Amendment No. 1

to License No. 20385 (registration series A 019757)

dated January 10, 2002



To amend clause 2 of the Conditions For Carrying Out Activities Under License No. 20385 to
read as follows:



2. The aggregate installed capacity of
the network and the percentage of territory covered hereunder, provided that sufficient frequency resources are allocated, must constitute as of December 31 of each year, respectively, no less than:



|     |  |   |  |                |  |   |  |    
|---- |  | - |  | -------------- |  | - |  | ---
|2004 |  | - |  | 5,000 numbers  |  | - |  | 30%
|2011 |  | - |  | 30,000 numbers |  | - |  | 70%



|                                                                                                    |  |             |  |               
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | --------------
|First Deputy Minister of the Russian
Federation for Telecommunications and Information Technologies |  | [Signature] |  | Yu.A. Pavlenko
|                                                                                                    |  |            
|                                                                                                    |  |             |  | April 17, 2002
|                                                                                                    |  |            
|Deputy Head of the Department of the
Organization of Licensing Activity                             |  | [Signature] |  | N.M. Popov    
|                                                                                                    |  | [Seal]      |  |
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5656 

To clarify the meaning of the term ‘‘prevailing party’’ with regard to the 

recovery of attorneys’ fees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2018 

Mr. CARTWRIGHT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify the meaning of the term ‘‘prevailing party’’ with 

regard to the recovery of attorneys’ fees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Catalyst Theory Res5 toration Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IN GENERAL. 

7 (a) MEANING OF PREVAILING PARTY.—In deter8 mining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any 

9 ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various depart10 ments and agencies of the United States, or of any judicial 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5656 IH

1 or administrative rule, which provides for recovery of at2 torneys’ fees, the term ‘‘prevailing party’’ shall include a 

3 party whose pursuit of a nonfrivolous claim or defense was 

4 a catalyst for a voluntary or unilateral change in position 

5 by the opposing party that provides any significant part 

6 of the relief sought. 

7 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—This section shall not 

8 alter special eligibility criteria established for prevailing 

9 defendants nor alter any specific eligibility criteria con10 tained in any statute that expressly limits or qualifies who 

11 may be considered a prevailing party for purposes of that 

12 statute. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
JWN-Q2.2014-Ex 10.6




Exhibit 10.6




AMENDMENT 2014-4
NORDSTROM 401(k) PLAN & PROFIT SHARING
(2014 Restatement)


The Nordstrom 401(k) Plan & Profit Sharing (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, pursuant to Plan Sections 15.2 and 15.5-1, to simplify the allocation of matching contributions by eliminating a provision that requires elective deferral contributions to remain in the Plan through the end of each Plan Year in order to be matched, effective for Plan Years beginning on and after January 1, 2014: 


1.    Section 5.4-1(Description of Matching Contributions) is amended effective January 1, 2014 by deleting in its entirety the sentence within that section that reads “Only Elective Deferral Contributions that remain in the Plan through the Anniversary Date shall be eligible to be matched by Employer Matching Contributions.”


*    *    *    *    *


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to proper authority, this Amendment 2014-4 has been executed on behalf of the Company this ________ day of ________________, 2014.




NORDSTROM, INC.








By:                            
Delena M. Sunday
Title:    Executive Vice President Human Resources
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 
 In connection with this Quarterly Report of Car Charging Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Farkas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Car Charging Group, Inc.
 
 By: /s/ Michael D. Farkas
 Michael D. Farkas
 Chief Executive Officer
 Principal Executive Officer
 
 August 23,  2010