alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORP., 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-32/RS-CJK

FAYE JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Show Cause Order (Doc. 26) and Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. 

38). 

Permissive joinder allows multiple defendants to be joined in one action if the 

right to relief arises “out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or 

occurrences” and “any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise in the 

action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). 

Here, it is clear that common questions of law predominate. Plaintiff represents 

that common questions of fact will also be at issue with only “time and place” 

differences. However, these “time and place” differences make inappropriate the joinder 

of parties who reside throughout the state’s three districts. Permissive joinder is a 

doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right. Its justification lies in considerations of 

judicial economy, convenience and fairness to litigants. Alexander v. Fulton County, 207

F.3d 1303, 1323 (11th Cir. 2000) (Citing United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 

Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 51 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 2
726 (1966). Quite simply, it is unfair to require defendants who reside in the Southern 

District and the Middle District to be hailed to court in the Northern District. I intend to 

sever those defendants who reside in a different district and/or those defendant where

Plaintiff has alleged that a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred 

in a different district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 

Plaintiff shall file a particularized report which (1) identifies the district in which 

each defendant resides and (2) identifies the district(s) where a substantial part of the 

events giving rise to the claim occurred for each of the Defendants – i.e., the location(s) 

where the defendants have allegedly used the trademark infringing products. 

This report shall be filed not later than July 21, 2011. 

ORDERED on July 7, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 51 Filed 07/07/11 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7320

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

STEVEN DONEWAN CARR, a/k/a Steven D. Carr,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. 

Voorhees, District Judge. (5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2)

Submitted: October 11, 2012 Decided: October 16, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Donewan Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Steven Donewan Carr appeals the district court’s order 

granting his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006).* We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Carr, 

No. 5:98-cr-00246-RLV-2 (W.D.N.C. July 17, 2012). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Although the district court granted Carr’s § 3582(c)(2) 

motion, it did not reduce Carr’s sentence to the full extent he 

requested.
| (1)   | the      quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Wishart Enterprises      Limited for the quarter ended February 28, 2007 fully complies with      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the      quarter ended February 29, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of Wishart Enterprises      Limited. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/      Barbara Lamb                                                    |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Barbara      Lamb                                                              |
|  Title:    |  Principal      Executive Officer,Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  March      31, 2008                                                            |
|    |                                                                                                                                                                    |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2018 of ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc. (the “registrant”); |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|                       |
|-----------------------|
|                       |  |  |  |
| Date: August 24, 2018 |   |   |   |
|                  | ARMOUR RESIDENTIAL REIT, INC. |
|                  |   |   |   |
|                  |   | By: | /s/ Scott J. Ulm |
|                  |   |   | Scott J. Ulm |
|                  |   |   | Co-Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolfe Creek Mining, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kristen
Paul, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
23rd day of April, 2008.


/s/ Kristen Paul
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Stabilization of Iraq

On May 22, 2003, by Executive Order 13303, I declared a national emergency protecting the Development Fund for Iraq and certain other property in which Iraq has an interest, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) (IEEPA). I took this action to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by obstacles to the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in the country, and the development of political, administrative, and economic institutions in Iraq.

In Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13438 of July 17, 2007, I modified the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and amended the steps taken pursuant to it.

Because the obstacles to the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace and security in the country, and the development of political, administrative, and economic institutions in Iraq continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on May 22, 2003, and the measures adopted on that date, August 28, 2003, July 29, 2004, November 29, 2004, and July 17, 2007, to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond May 22, 2008. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the stabilization of Iraq.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         **Federal Register**                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 08-1288

Billing code 3195-01-P
# C_2011164EN.01001101.xml

| 2.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6063 — Itochu/Speedy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 164/07

On 12 May 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6063. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6063. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Filed: July 3, 1997 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7285 (CA-96-608-AM) Michael Edward Cooper, Petitioner - Appellant, versus Ronald J. Angelone, Respondent - Appellee.

ORDER The Court amends its opinion filed June 5, 1997, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 4 -- the decided date is corrected to read June 5 , 1997. For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7285 MICHAEL EDWARD COOPER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-608-AM) Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Edward Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: Michael Edward Cooper seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cooper v. Angelone , No. CA-96-608- AM (E.D. Va. July 9, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19

- 0490

_________________ GRIZ ONE FIREFIGHTING,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. STATE OF MONTANA, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY, EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS DIVISION AND MATTHEW SEA N WEST, Defendants and Appellees. O R D E R

_________________ This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellee Department of Labor and Industry , Employment Relation Division ’ s response brief filed ele ctronically
on June 9, 2020 , this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the below

referenced Rule and must be resubmitted. M. R. App. P. 12(1)(i) requires an appendix to include its own table of contents. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the Appellee Department of Labor and Industry , Employment Relation Division shall electronically file with the Clerk o f this Court a revised brief containing the revisions
necessary to comply with the specifi ed R ule and that the Appellee Department of Labor and Industry , Employment Relation Division shall serve copies of the revised brief on all parties of record ; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions , or de letions other than those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief. 06/12/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0490The Cl erk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to the Appellee

Department of Labor and Industry , Employment Relation Division and to all parties of record.

Electronically signed by: James Jeremiah Shea Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 12 2020
FILED

February 18, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

JANUARY 1998 SESSION

DOYLE HART, )

) NO. 02C01-9703-CC-00102

Appellant, )

) LAKE COUNTY

VS. )

) HON. J. STEVEN STAFFORD,

BILLY COMPTON, WARDEN, ) JUDGE

)

Appellee. ) (Writ of Habeas Corpus)

FOR THE APPELLANT:

DOYLE HART, Pro Se

Register Number 201666

Route 1, Box 330

Tiptonville, TN 38079-9775

FOR THE APPELLEE:

JOHN KNOX WALKUP

Attorney General and Reporter

ELIZABETH T. RYAN

Assistant Attorney General

Cordell Hull Building, 2nd Floor

425 Fifth Avenue North

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

C. PHILLIP BIVENS

District Attorney General

P.O. Drawer E

Dyersburg, TN 38025-2005

OPINION FILED: 

AFFIRMED - RULE 20

JOE G. RILEY,

JUDGE
2

ORDER

The petitioner, Doyle Hart, appeals the order of the Lake County Circuit Court

dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He brought this petition claiming

that the indictment charging him with aggravated rape and incest did not allege the

appropriate mens rea. We affirm the judgment of the trial court pursuant to Rule 20,

Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.

Petitioner asserts that the indictment charging him with aggravated rape and

incest was fatally defective in that it did not allege the specific mens rea. The

indictment reads, in pertinent part, “that [petitioner] . . . unlawfully and feloniously

did have unlawful sexual penetration of another,” in Count One; and petitioner “did

unlawfully and feloniously have carnal knowledge of [victim],” in Count Two. He

argues that the failure to allege the specific mens rea in the indictment constituted

the failure to allege an offense. Therefore, he claims that the judgment is void on

its face.

We find that the language of this indictment provided adequate notice to both

the defendant and the trial court and is not deficient. See State v. Hill, 954 S.W.2d

725 (Tenn. 1997).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 20,

Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals.

 

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

CONCUR:

 

JOE B. JONES, PRESIDING JUDGE

 

PAUL G. SUMMERS, JUDGE
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: May 16, 2011 | By:    |  /s/ Gary Delaurentiis   |   |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|           |   | Gary DeLaurentiis             |
|                |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|                |   | (principal executive officer) |
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 41 (Friday, March 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9529-9530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-995]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTIONS COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission

DATE AND TIME: Thursday, March 8, 2007, at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor)

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Advisory Opinion 2007-01: Senator Claire McCaskill and McCaskill 
for Auditor by counsel, Marc E. Elias and Caroline P. Goodson.
    Advisory Opinion 2007-02: The Arizona Libertarian Party, Inc. by 
Warren Severin, Treasurer.

[[Page 9530]]

    Demonstration of Advisory Opinion Search System.
    Management and Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-995 Filed 2-28-07; 2:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 16, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00611-CV

TONY'S BBQ AND STEAKHOUSE, Appellant

V.

CARNES ENGINEERING, Appellee

On Appeal from the 344th District Court

Chambers County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV23075

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This appeal is from a judgment signed June 11, 2014. No clerk’s record has 

been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed 

the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. 

On August 12, 2014, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 
2

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

Appellant has not provided this court with proof of payment for the record. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Busby.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of HomeLife  Inc.'s (the "Company")  Annual Report
on Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending May 31,  2006 with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Andrew Cimerman,  the
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        / s / Andrew Cimerman
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Andrew Cimerman
                                        President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
Date:  September 11, 2006