8788 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 27, 2007 / Notices 

term agreement for power interference 

in the Colorado-Big Thompson Project. 

35. Frenchman-Cambridge ID; 

Meeker-Driftwood, Red Willow, and 

Cambridge Units; Frenchman Division; 

P–SMBP; Cambridge, Nebraska: Amend 

the repayment contract for equalization 

of the construction obligation payments 

over the remaining years of the water 

supply repayment obligation period, 

and to delay the increase in the reserve 

fund payments pursuant to Pub. L. 109–

386, which was enacted on December 

12, 2006. 

36. Kansas-Bostwick ID No. 2; 

Courtland Unit, Bostwick Division, P–

SMBP; Courtland, Kansas: Amend the 

repayment contract for equalization of 

the construction obligation payments 

over the remaining years of the water 

supply repayment obligation period, 

and to delay the increase in the reserve 

fund payments pursuant to Pub. L. 109–

386, which was enacted on December 

12, 2006. 

37. Bostwick ID in Nebraska; 

Superior-Courtland and Franklin Units, 

Bostwick Division, P–SMBP; Red Cloud, 

Nebraska: Amend the repayment 

contract for equalization of the 

construction obligation payments over 

the remaining years of the water supply 

repayment obligation period, and to 

delay the increase in the reserve fund 

payments pursuant to Pub. L. 109–386, 

which was enacted on December 12, 

2006. 

38. Webster ID; Webster Unit, 

Solomon Division, P-SMBP; Gaylord, 

Kansas: Amend the repayment contract 

for equalization of the construction 

obligation payments over the remaining 

years of the water supply repayment 

obligation period, and to delay the 

increase in the reserve fund payments 

pursuant to Pub. L. 109–386, which was 

enacted on December 12, 2006. 

39. City of Grand Junction, City of 

Fruita, and Town of Palisade (Municipal 

Recreation Agreement), Colorado-Big 

Thompson Project; Colorado: 

Negotiation of renewal of the Municipal 

Recreation Agreement to provide 

historic users pool surplus water from 

Green Mountain Reservoir for 

nonconsumptive municipal recreation 

uses. 

40. Colorado River Water 

Conservation District, Ruedi Reservoir, 

Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, Colorado: 

Consideration of a request for a second 

round water sales or repayment contract 

from the regulatory capacity of Ruedi 

Reservoir for up to 5,000 acre-feet 

annually for M&I uses and also 

providing water to the endangered fish 

and supplementing in-stream flows. 

41. Colorado River Water 

Conservation District, Colorado-Big 

Thompson Project, Colorado: Long-term 

exchange, conveyance, and storage 

contract to implement the Exhibit B 

Agreement of the Settlement Agreement 

on Operating Procedures for Green 

Mountain Reservoir Concerning 

Operating Limitations and in Resolution 

of the Petition Filed August 7, 2003, in 

Case No. 49–CV–2782 (The United 

States v Northern Colorado Water 

Conservancy District, et al., U.S. District 

Court for the District of Colorado, Case 

No. 2782 and Consolidated Case Nos. 

5016 and 5017). 

42. Colorado River Water 

Conservation District, Colorado-Big 

Thompson Project, Colorado: 

Consideration of a request for a longterm contract for the use of excess 

capacity for storage and exchange in 

Green Mountain Reservoir in the 

Colorado-Big Thompson Project. 

43. Greenfields ID, Sun River Project, 

Montana: Modification of Gibson Dam 

will be required depending on the 

outcome of the Corrective Action Study, 

and will require a contract for 

repayment of allocable SOD costs. 

44. Glendo Unit, P–SMBP, Wyoming: 

Contract renewal for long-term water 

service contracts with Burbank Ditch, 

New Grattan Ditch Company, 

Torrington ID, Lucernce Canal and 

Power Company, and Wright and 

Murphy Ditch Company. 

45. Glendo Unit, P–SMBP, Nebraska: 

Contract renewal for long-term water 

service contracts with Bridgeport, 

Enterprise, and Mitchell IDs, and 

Central Nebraska Public Power and ID. 

46. Glendo Unit, P–SMBP, Wyoming: 

Contract renewal for long-term water 

storage contract with Pacificorp. 

47. Roger W. Evans (Individual), 

Boysen Unit, P–SMBP, Wyoming: 

Renewal of long-term water service 

contracts. 

48. City of Beloit, P–SMBP, Kansas: 

Execution of a contract amendment to 

the original contract to add a renewal 

provision in accordance with Section 1 

of the Act of June 21, 1963. 

The following actions have been 

reported as completed since the last 

publication of this notice on November 

20, 2006: 

1. (19) Clark Canyon Water Supply 

Company, East Bench Unit, P–SMBP, 

Montana: Negotiating renewal of 

contract No. 14–06–600–3592 which 

was amended to expire December 31, 

2006. Current contract may be amended 

again to extend the term not to exceed 

an additional 1 year pursuant to Section 

208 of the 2005 Consolidated 

Appropriations Act if necessary and 

agreed to by both parties. Contract 

executed November 9, 2006. 

2. (20) East Bench ID, East Bench 

Unit, P–SMBP, Montana: Negotiating 

renewal of contract No. 14–06–600–

3593 which was amended to expire 

December 31, 2006. Current contract 

may be amended again to extend the 

term not to exceed an additional 1 year 

pursuant to Section 208 of the 2005 

Consolidated Appropriations Act if 

necessary and agreed to by both parties. 

Contract executed November 9, 2006. 

Dated: January 26, 2007. 

Roseann Gonzales, 

Director, Office of Program and Policy 

Services. 

[FR Doc. E7–3376 Filed 2–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation 

and Enforcement 

Notice of Proposed Information 

Collection for 1029–0039 

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining 

Reclamation and Enforcement. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: In compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the 

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation 

and Enforcement (OSM) is announcing 

its intention to request renewed 

approval for the collection of 

information on 30 CFR Part 784, 

Underground Mining Permit 

Applications—Minimum Requirements 

for Reclamation and Operation Plans. 

DATES: Comments on the proposed 

information collection must be received 

by April 30, 2007, to be assured of 

consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to 

John A. Trelease, Office of Surface 

Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 

1951 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 

202—SIB, Washington, DC 20240. 

Comments may also be submitted 

electronically to jtrelease@osmre.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To 

request a copy of the information 

collection request and explanatory 

information, contact John A. Trelease, at 

(202) 208–2783, or electronically at 

jtrelease@osmre.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) 

regulations at 5 CFR part 1320, which 

implement provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13), 

require that interested members of the 

public and affected agencies have an 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection and recordkeeping activities 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 27, 2007 / Notices 8789 

(see 5 CFR 1320.8(d)). This notice 

identifies information collections that 

OSM will be submitting to OMB for 

extension. These collections are 

contained in 30 CFR part 784. 

OSM has revised burden estimates, 

where appropriate, to reflect current 

reporting levels or adjustments based on 

reestimates of burden or respondents 

and costs. OSM will request a 3-year 

term of approval for this information 

collection activity. 

Comments are invited on: (1) The 

need for the collection of information 

for the performance of the functions of 

the agency; (2) the accuracy of the 

agency’s burden estimates; (3) ways to 

enhance the quality, utility and clarity 

of the information collection; and (4) 

ways to minimize the information 

collection burden on respondents, such 

as use of automated means of collection 

of the information. A summary of the 

public comments will accompany 

OSM’s submission of the information 

collection request to OMB. 

This notice provides the public with 

60 days in which to comment on the 

following information collection 

activity: 

Title: 30 CFR Part 784, Underground 

Mining Permit Applications—Minimum 

requirements for Reclamation and 

Operation Plans. 

OMB Control Number: 1029–0039. 

Summary: Sections 507(b), 508(a) and 

516(b) of Public Law 95–87 require 

underground coal mine permit 

applicants to submit an operations and 

reclamation plan and establish 

performance standards for the mining 

operation. Information submitted is 

used by the regulatory authority to 

determine if the applicant can comply 

with the applicable performance and 

environmental standards required by 

the law. 

Bureau Form Number: None. 

Frequency of Collection: Once. 

Description of Respondents: 63 

underground coal mining permit 

applicants and 24 State regulatory 

authorities. 

Total Annual Responses: 790. 

Total Annual Burden Hours: 65,159. 

Total Annual Cost Burden: $537,105. 

Dated: February 21, 2007. 

John R. Craynon, 

Chief, Division of Regulatory Support. 

[FR Doc. 07–871 Filed 2–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–05–M 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–559] 

In the Matter of Certain Digital 

Processors and Digital Processing 

Systems, Components Thereof, and 

Products Containing Same; Notice of 

Commission Decision Not To Review 

an Initial Determination Granting 

Complainant’s Motion To Amend the 

Complaint and Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 19) issued by the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting complainant’s motion to amend 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michelle Walters, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5468. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

investigation was instituted on January 

9, 2006, based on a complaint filed by 

Biax Corporation (‘‘Biax’’) of Boulder, 

Colorado. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain digital processors or digital 

processing systems, components 

thereof, or products containing the same 

by reason of infringement of various 

claims of United States Patent Nos. 

5,021,945 (‘‘the ‘945 patent’’), 5,517,628 

(‘‘the ‘628 patent’’), and 6,253,313 (‘‘the 

‘313 patent’’). The complaint originally 

named four respondents: Philips 

Semiconductors B.V. of the 

Netherlands; Philips Consumer 

Electronics Services B.V. of the 

Netherlands; Philips Consumer 

Electronics North America Corp. of 

Atlanta, Georgia; and 2Wire, Inc. of San 

Jose, California. Biax previously 

amended the complaint and notice of 

investigation to remove Philips 

Consumer Electronics North America 

Corp. and Philips Consumer Electronics 

Services B.V. and to add Philips 

Electronics North America Corp., 

Philips Semiconductors, Inc., and 

Philips Consumer Electronics B.V. as 

respondents. 

On January 23, 2007, Biax moved to 

amend the complaint and notice of 

investigation to remove respondent 

Philips Semiconductors B.V. and to add 

NXP B.V. of the Netherlands as a 

respondent. Biax stated that it had 

recently learned that Philips 

Semiconductors B.V. was spun off into 

a new business entity NXP B.V. Biax 

also moved to withdraw claims 3, 4, 8, 

and 12 of the ‘945 patent and all of the 

asserted claims of the ‘628 patent and 

the ‘313 patent from the investigation to 

reduce the number of issues. None of 

the current respondents or the 

Commission investigative attorney 

opposed Biax’s motion. 

On February 2, 2007, the ALJ issued 

an ID (Order No. 19) granting Biax’s 

motion to amend the complaint and 

notice of investigation. The ALJ found 

that, pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.14(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.14(b)(1)), there 

was good cause to remove respondent 

Philips Semiconductors B.V. and to add 

NXP B.V. as a respondent and to 

withdraw claims 3, 4, 8, and 12 of the 

‘945 patent and the asserted claims of 

the ‘628 patent and the ‘313 patent from 

the investigation. No petitions for 

review of the ID were filed. 

Having examined the record of this 

investigation, the Commission has 

determined not to review the ALJ’s ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 22, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–3386 Filed 2–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES