alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judge McClanahan, Senior Judges Coleman and Annunziata 

SAMUEL SHIPKOVITZ 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1468-05-4 PER CURIAM 

 MARCH 21, 2006 

H. JAMES HANSEN 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Samuel Shipkovitz, pro se, on brief). Appellant submitting on 

brief. 

 No brief for appellee. 

 Samuel Shipkovitz, Esq. appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission 

awarding attorneys’ fees as follows: (1) $500 to Shipkovitz; (2) $500 to Raymond W. Konan, 

Esq.; and (3) $4,000 to H. James Hansen, Esq. Shipkovitz contends the commission abused its 

discretion in dividing the attorneys’ fees, which had been held in escrow by the commission 

pursuant to a compromise settlement approved by the commission. 

 By order dated January 11, 2006, we directed the parties to file briefs with this Court 

within twenty-five (25) days of the date of that order addressing whether we have appellate 

jurisdiction to hear an appeal filed by one attorney subject to the commission’s award dividing 

attorneys’ fees against another attorney subject to that award, where neither the employer nor the 

employee is a party to the appeal. On February 1, 2006, Said Chahmoune, the claimant, and 

Shipkovitz filed a “Joint Motion for Clarification of Order Requesting Brief as to Jurisdiction 

and For Extension of Time To Respond.” We hereby deny that motion. 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 -

 We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is 

without merit. We find no abuse of discretion in the commission’s division of attorneys’ fees 

and affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Chahmoune v. KD 

Electricals, VWC File No. 212-25-19 (May 19, 2005). 

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Alcantara Brands Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carlos
Alcantara, President and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/S/
      Carlos AlcantaraCarlos
      AlcantaraPresident
      andPrincipal
      Financial OfficerMay
      20, 2009
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A1 05 5 . MI CHAEL R. BARBOUR, J R. v . SUMANDEEP SANGHA et a l

.

In t h i s m ed i cal m al p ract i ce, t h e t ri al co urt d en ied pl ai n t i ff M i ch ael Barb o u r’ s

m o ti o n fo r en t ry o f d efau l t ju d gm en t ag ai n s t d efen d an t Dr. Su m an d eep San g h a an d

fo u n d t h at t h e m o t i o n l ack ed s u b s tan t i al ju st i fi cat i o n s uch t h at an award of at t o rn ey

fees u n d er OCGA § 9 -1 5 -1 4 (b ) was warran t ed

. B a rb o u r ap p eal ed

, an d t h i s Co u rt

affi rm ed t h e d en i al o f h is m o t i o n fo r en t ry o f d efau l t ju dg m en t b u t v acat ed t h e t ri al

co u rt ’ s fi n d in g t h a t Barb o u r was l i ab l e fo r fees u n d er OCGA § 9 -1 5 -1 4 (b ) an d

rem an ded fo r fu rt her p ro ceed i n g s

. Ba r b o u r v. S a n g h a , 34 6 Ga. Ap p

. 1 3 (8 1 5 SE2 d

2 2 8 ) (2 0 1 8 ). On rem an d an d aft er an ev i d en t i ary heari n g , t he tri al c o u rt award ed

San gh a at t o rn ey fees p u rs uan t to OCGA § 9 -1 5 -1 4 (b ). Barb o u r t h en fi l ed t h i s d i rect

ap p eal . W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Ap p eal s fro m o rd ers g ran t i n g o r d en y i n g at t orn ey fees an d l i ti g at i o n ex p en s es

u n d er OCGA § 9 -1 5-1 4 m u s t b e m ad e b y d i s cret i o n ary ap p li cat i o n , no t d i rect ap p eal

. See OCGA § 5-6 -3 5 (a) (1 0 ). Barb o ur’ s fai l u r e t o c o m p l y wi t h t h e d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew p ro ced u re d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct io n o v er t h i s ap p eal . See Jo n es v. Pa d g et t

, 1 8 6 Ga. Ap p

. 3 6 2

, 3 6 3 (2 ) (3 67 SE2 d 8 8 ) (1 9 8 8 ); s ee al s o Ca p r i co rn S ys t ems v.

Go d a va rt h y , 2 53 Ga. A p p. 84 0, 8 4 1 (5 6 0 SE2 d 7 3 0 ) (2 00 2 ). Acco rd in g l y , t h i s ap p eal

i s h ereb y DISM ISSED. April 27, 2021C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/27/2021
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6275]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Notice of Meeting: Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, 
Health, and Society

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
fifteenth meeting of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, 
Health, and Society (SACGHS), U.S. Public Health Service. The meeting 
will be held from 8:30 a.m. to approximately 5:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
February 12, 2008 and 8 a.m. to approximately 5 p.m. on Wednesday, 
February 13, 2008, at the Hubert H. Humphrey Building--200 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20201. The meeting will be open to the 
public with attendance limited to space available. The meeting also 
will be Web cast.
    The main agenda item will involve deliberations on the oversight of 
genetic testing, including an overview of public comments received on 
the Committee's draft report U.S. System of Oversight of Genetic 
Testing: A Response to the Charge of the Secretary of HHS and the 
formulation of final recommendations to the Secretary.
    As always, the Committee welcomes hearing from anyone wishing to 
provide public comment on any issue related to genetics, health and 
society. Individuals who would like to provide public comment should 
notify the SACGHS Executive Secretary, Ms. Sarah Carr, by telephone at 
301-496-9838 or e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#67040615151427080349090e0f49000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f1c1e0d0d0c3f101b5111161751181009">[email protected]</span></a>. The SACGHS office is 
located at 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 750, Bethesda, MD 20892. Anyone 
planning to attend the meeting who is in need of special assistance, 
such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, is also asked to contact the Executive Secretary.
    Under authority of 42 U.S.C. 217a, section 222 of the Public Health 
Service Act, as amended, the Department of Health and Human Services 
established SACGHS to serve as a public forum for deliberations on the 
broad range of human health and societal issues raised by the 
development and use of genetic and genomic technologies and, as 
warranted, to provided advice on these issues. The draft meeting agenda 
and other information about SACGHS, including information about access 
to the Web cast, will be available at the following Web site: http://www4.od.nih.gov/oba/sacghs.htm.

    Dated: December 21, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, NIH Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-6275 Filed 1-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 20, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 20, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20I0134. TAUHEED EPPS P/K/A 2 CHAINZ et al. v. ROCKMO ENTERTAINMENT, LLC.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 2015CV258187
Opinion issued December 15, 2022

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

——————————— — NO. 01

- 22

- 00876

- CR

——————————

— IN RE NKRUMAH LAMUMBA VALIER, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of

Mandamus

Relator, Nkrumah Lamumba Valier, incarcerated and proceeding pro se,

has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. 1 Relator seeks issuance of a writ to
compel respondent, the Honorable Abigail Anastasio, to rule on a post

conviction motion seeking an out

- of

- time appeal.

1 The underlying conviction was in The State of Texas v. Nkrumah Lamumba Valier
, Cause No. 1030025, in the 184th District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Jan Krocker presiding. According to his petition, relator’s post

- conviction motion was filed in the same court with the Honorable Abigail Anastasio presiding.2

Relator’s petition reflects that he seeks relief from a final felony

conviction. Because his petition involves a final post

- conviction felony
proceeding, article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs and
provides the exclusive means to challenge the conviction. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

.

P ROC

. A NN . art. 11.07 (Vernon 2015); Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth

Dist. , 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (citations omitted); Bd. of

Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dis t. , 910
S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (citation omitted). Only the Texas
Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction in final post

- conviction proceedings.

In re McAfee
, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig.
proceeding) (citation omitted); see In re Briscoe
, 230 S.W.3d 196, 196

– 97 (Tex.

App.

– Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) (“Article 11.07 contains no

role for the courts of appeals.”) In such cases, a petitioner files an application for

writ of hab eas corpus with the clerk of the court in which the conviction being
challenged was obtained, and the clerk shall assign the application to that court.

See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P. art. 11.07, sec. 3(b). When the application is received by
that court, a writ of habeas corpus, returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals,
shall issue by operation of law. Id.3

Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction over relator’s mandamus
petition, and we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Countiss and Rivas

- Molloy.
Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000202932
<NAME> PRO-FAC COOPERATIVE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-23-1995
<CASH>                                            6188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    71974
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     211590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                309738
<PP&E>                                          277035
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  719686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           192953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           255
<PREFERRED>                                        76083
<COMMON>                                         9441
<OTHER-SE>                                       46298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     71986
<SALES>                                         373364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                373364
<CGS>                                           279141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    83023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               21005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2711)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7094)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5593 

To render certain military spouses eligible for adjustment of status. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2018 

Mr. SOTO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To render certain military spouses eligible for adjustment 

of status. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Patriot 

5 Spouses Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS FOR CERTAIN MILITARY 

7 SPOUSES. 

8 Section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

9 (8 U.S.C. 1255) is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5593 IH

1 ‘‘(n)(1) In applying this section to an alien described 

2 in paragraph (2)— 

3 ‘‘(A) such alien shall be deemed, for purposes 

4 of subsection (a), to have been inspected and admit5 ted into the United States; and 

6 ‘‘(B) in determining the alien’s admissibility as 

7 an immigrant, paragraphs (6)(A), (7)(A), and 

8 (9)(B) of section 212(a) shall not apply. 

9 ‘‘(2) An alien is described in this paragraph if the 

10 alien— 

11 ‘‘(A) is or was the spouse of a United States 

12 citizen who— 

13 ‘‘(i) is or was serving on active duty in the 

14 United States Armed Forces or in a reserve 

15 component of the United States Armed Forces; 

16 and 

17 ‘‘(ii) if discharged or released from service 

18 in the Armed Forces, was discharged or re19 leased under honorable conditions; and 

20 ‘‘(B) is the beneficiary of a petition for classi21 fication under section 204(a)(1)(A) as an immediate 

22 relative (as defined in section 201(b)) by reason of 

23 the marriage to such citizen.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 14, 2008)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 27717]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1264]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 14, 2008 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 27717]]

                Memorandum of May 6, 2008

                
Assignment of Reporting Function Under Subsection 
                1225(a) of the John Warner National Defense 
                Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of title 3, United 
                States Code, I hereby assign to you the function of the 
                President under subsection 1225(a) of the John Warner 
                National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 
                (Public Law 109-364).

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, May 6, 2008.

[FR Doc. 08-1264
Filed 5-13-08; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
|   | (i) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company, for the period ended June 30, 2011, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:        | /s/ E. G. Marchi               |   |
|--------|------------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name  | E. G. Marchi                   |   |
|   | Title:     | Chief Financial Officer        |   |
|   |       | (Principal Accounting Officer) |   |
|   |       |                           |   |
|   | Date:      | September 2, 2011              |   |

----
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MELVIN LEWIS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-50239

D.C. No. 2:03-cr-01281-DDP

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Melvin Lewis appeals from the district court’s order granting in part and

denying in part his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. We

have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

APR 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-50239

 Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lewis’ counsel has

filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a

pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has

been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT LEE MILHOUSE,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:11cv107-WS

HERMAN ATKINS, JR.,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 19)

docketed October 8, 2013. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's case

be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The plaintiff

has filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

 The court has reviewed the record and has determined that the magistrate

judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 19) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The plaintiff's complaint, and this action, are hereby DISMISSED for failure

to state a claim.
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)."

4. The clerk shall note on the docket that the case was dismissed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of November , 2013.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE