alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.1.4**

**Exhibit ASCHEDULE OF PARTNERS,ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP UNITS, PERCENTAGE INTERESTSAND THE AGREED UPON VALUE OF NON-CASH INTERCOMPANY ADVANCES**
| Date Admitted     | ** ** | ** **                                                              | ** ** | **Name and address of partners** | ** ** | **Value of  non-cash  intercompany  advance** | ** ** | **Partnership  units issued** | ** ** | **Approx.  Percentage  Interests** | ** ** | **Federal ID #** | ** ** |
|------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|------------|
| 02/04/1997             |       | GTA  LP, Inc. 14 North   Adger’s Wharf Charleston,   SC 29401 |       | $                                                    |       |                                               |       | 7,302,479                          |       |                               |       | 99.31                      | %          |   | 58-2290326 |   |
| 02/04/1997             |       | GTA  GP, Inc. 14 North   Adger’s Wharf Charleston,   SC 29401 |       | $                                                    |       |                                               |       | 14,684                             |       |                               |       | 0.20                       | %          |   | 58-2290217 |   |
| Total Common OP  Units |       |                                                                    |       |                                                 |       |                                               | 7,317,163  |                               |       |                               | 100.00     | %                          |       |   |   |
|                   |       | GTA LP, Inc. 10  North   Adger’s Wharf Charleston,   SC 29401 |       | $                                                    | 20,000,000 |                                               |       | 800,000                            |       |                               |       | 100                        | %          |   |   |   |

 

----
Why does workplace motor vehicle safety matter? 

Millions of workers drive or ride in a vehicle as part of their jobs, and 

crashes are the leading cause of work-related deaths in the United States. 

Keep workers safe on the road. 

All workers are at risk of 

crashes, whether they 

drive light or heavy 

vehicles, or whether 

driving is a main or 

incidental job duty. 

From 2003-2014 there were 22,000 

work-related motor vehicle deaths 

in the United States. 

The goal of the Center for Motor Vehicle Safety 

is to make sure that those who work in or near vehicles 

come home safely at the end of their workday. 

$671,000 

per death 

$25 billion 

total cost to U.S. employers for 

motor vehicle crashes at work 

Motor vehicle 

crashes impact 

workers, their 

families, businesses, 

and communities. 

$65,000 

per nonfatal 

injury 

*Data from 2013 

Source: NETS, Cost of Motor Vehicle 

Crashes to Employers – 2015 

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Table A-2, 2014 

Learn how to keep your workers safe: 

www.cdc.gov/niosh/motorvehicle

 @NIOSH_MVSafety 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 

NIOSH Center for 

Motor Vehicle Safety 

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Table A-2, 2003-2014
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ulrik Gerdes, Chief Financial Officer of Bark Group Inc.
(the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date this 28thday of January, 2010

|By: | /s/ Ulrik Gerdes                            | 
|--- | ------------------------------------------- | 
|    | Ulrik Gerdes, Chief
      Financial Officer | 
|    | (Principal
      Financial Officer)         | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, John Lackland, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Power Efficiency Corporation;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the smallbusiness issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 14, 2007 /s/  John Lackland   John Lackland        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER(PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER)
Exhibit 21.1

GOLF TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

GTA
GP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

GTA
LP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

Golf
Trust of America, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership in which GTA GP, Inc. is the sole general partner.

GTATierra
Del Sol, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAPalm
Desert, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company (dissolved effective December 31, 2004)

GTAManagement,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company (dissolved effective December 31, 2004)

GTAWekiva,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company (sold 8/26/04)

GTACypress
Creek, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company (dissolved effective December 31, 2004)

GTABlack
Bear, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company (sold 9/24/04)

GTAPete
Dye, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAMystic
Creek, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company (dissolved effective December 31, 2004)

GTAStonehenge,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTAInnisbrook,
LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company (dissolved effective December 31, 2004)

GTAIB,
LLC, a Florida limited liability company

GTAIB
Operations, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

GTAIB
Management, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

GTAIB
Condominium, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

GTAIB
Golf Resort, LLC, a Florida limited liability company

---



QuickLinks
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41323 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MARTIN LORENZO ARGETA

- JIRON , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 538

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Martin Lorenzo Argeta

- Jiron has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States
v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Argeta

- Jiron has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Argeta

- Jiron ’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 21 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41323 Document: 00513557266 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016No. 15

- 41323

2 to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Argeta

- Jiron ’ s response . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous is sue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-41323 Document: 00513557266 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Moody National REIT I, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Robert W. EngelRobert W. EngelChief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                          GOLF TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

GTA GP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

GTA LP, Inc., a Maryland corporation

Golf Trust of America, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership in which GTA
GP, Inc. is the sole general partner.

Sandpiper-Golf Trust, LLC, a California limited liability company

GTA Tierra Del Sol, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTA Osage, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTA Palm Desert, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTA Brentwood, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

GTA Management, LLC, a South Carolina limited liability company

Sandpiper GTA Development, Inc. (DISSOLVED EFFECTIVE 12/31/99)
NO. 12-23-00262-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

RONNIE LYNN GILBERT, 

APPELLANT

V.

BOB YORK, 

APPELLEE

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 7TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). 

Ronnie Lynn Gilbert, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal on October 10, 2023. On 

October 11, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the notice of appeal failed to contain 

the information specifically required by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and Section 

51.017(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5 (service); see 

also TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.017(a) (West Supp. 2019) (notice of appeal must 

be served on each court reporter responsible for preparing reporter’s record). The notice warned 

that, unless Appellant filed a proper notice of appeal on or before October 23, the appeal would 

be referred to the Court for dismissal. On October 19, Appellant filed a motion for extension of 

time, which failed to comply with appellate Rules 9.5 and 10.1. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1 

(contents of motions). Thus, this Court gave Appellant until October 30 to comply with the 

1

 Pro se litigants are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply with all 

applicable rules of procedure; otherwise, pro se litigants would benefit from an unfair advantage over parties 

represented by counsel. Muhammed v. Plains Pipeline, L.P., No. 12-16-00189-CV, 2017 WL 2665180, at *2 n.3 

(Tex. App.—Tyler June 21, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op.). 
2 

rules. This deadline passed and Appellant has not filed a compliant motion for extension of time, 

a compliant notice of appeal, or other response to this Court’s notices. 

Because Appellant failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 9.5 and Section 51.017(a), 

the appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (on its own initiative after giving ten days’ 

notice to all parties, appellate court may dismiss appeal if appeal is subject to dismissal because 

appellant failed to comply with a requirement of these rules, a court order, or a notice from the 

clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time). 

Opinion delivered November 8, 2023. 

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT 

NOVEMBER 8, 2023 

NO. 12-23-00262-CV

RONNIE LYNN GILBERT, 

Appellant 

V.

BOB YORK, 

Appellee

Appeal from the 7th District Court 

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 22-2185-A) 

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed. 

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance. 

By per curiam opinion. 

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Title Starts Online Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen S. Burns, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1)           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:  May 20, 2010
/s/ Stephen S. BurnsStephen S. Burns,Chief Executive and Financial Officer

(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 21.1**

Subsidiaries of Autobytel Inc. 

Autobytel Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

Auto-By-Tel Acceptance Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

Auto-By-TelInsurance Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

e~autosdirect.com inc., a Delaware corporation, doing business as “autobyteldirect.com”

Autoweb.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

A.I.N.Corporation, a California corporation, doing business as “CarSmart.com” 

Autobytel Information Services Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Autobytel Acquisition Corp., a California corporation 

AVV, Inc., aDelaware corporation 

Retention Performance Marketing, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Car.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

Autobytel Columbia Corp., a Delaware corporation 

Stoneage Financial Corporation, a Michigan corporation
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WINDSOR E. COOKS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv326-SPM/GRJ

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS and

EDWIN BUSS,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated July 12, 2011. Doc. 3. Plaintiff has been furnished a

copy and has filed objections, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). Doc. 4. Despite the objections, I have determined that the report and

recommendation is correct and should be adopted. 

In his objections, Plaintiff acknowledges that his case is subject to

dismissal under the three strikes provision of Title 28, United States Code,

Section 1915(g). But instead of dismissal, he asks for 60 days to pay the filing

fee. 

Because the dismissal is without prejudice, Plaintiff may refile his case

Case 4:11-cv-00326-SPM-GRJ Document 5 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

with full payment of the filing fees. There is no need for this case to remain open. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 3) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(g).

3. The clerk shall note on the docket that this case was dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of August, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:11cv326-SPM/GRJ

Case 4:11-cv-00326-SPM-GRJ Document 5 Filed 08/19/11 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

**GOLF TRUST OFAMERICA, INC.**

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No. 333-46657,No. 333-39628 and No. 333-46659 on Form S-8and Registration Statements No. 333-56251, No. 333-39624and No. 333-39622 on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 30,2007, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Golf Trust ofAmerica, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006.
|                           | /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP |
|---------------------------|----------------------|
| Charlotte, North Carolina |                 |
| March 30, 2007       | BDO Seidman, LLP     |

 

----
Exhibit 10.9


 


Summary Translation of Agreement with
Shanghai Hengguan New Materials Co.


 


Note: Zhejiang Tantech Bamboo Technology Co.,
Ltd contracts from time to time with Shanghai Hengguan New Materials Co. The summary below is from one of a series of agreements
that the companies use that constitute separate agreements, yet all such agreements are identical in all material respects.


 


Party A: Zhejiang Tantech Bamboo Technology
Co., Ltd 


 


Party B: Shanghai Hengguan New Materials
Co.


 


Contract Term: 2012-01-05 till 2012-12-31


 


Sales
scope: Zhejiang Tantech Bamboo Technology Co., Ltd (“Company”) authorizes Shanghai Hengguan New Materials Co.
(“Party B”) as sales agent of “Charcoal Doctor” products; the distribution channel is circulation; Party
B shall follow the pricing offered by the Company; products shall be shipped upon receipt of funds/cash; minimum first order is
5000 yuan; before the 8th day of each month, the Company shall mail the accounts receivable statement for the previous
month to Party B. Party B shall confirm and stamp the statement within three days upon receipt and mail it back to the Company
for filing; Party B promises its sales price won’t be lower than its purchase price from the Company. If there are no business
transactions after 15 days of the effective date of the Agreement, the Agreement is terminated automatically.