alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with this Quarterly Report of INDEPENDENT FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth Eade, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated:  May 23 2011 | /s/ Kenneth Eade
Kenneth Eade
Chief Financial Officer and Director
|------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 67 (Monday, April 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 18799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1108]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting Notice; Announcing a Partially Open Meeting 
of the Board of Directors

Time and Date: The open meeting of the Board of Directors is scheduled 
to begin at 10 a.m. on Wednesday, April 9, 2008. The closed portion of 
the meeting will follow immediately the open portion of the meeting.

Place: Board Room, First Floor, Federal Housing Finance Board, 1625 Eye 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20006.

Status: The first portion of the meeting will be open to the public. 
The final portion of the meeting will be closed to the public.

Matter To Be Considered At The Open Portion: Affordable Housing Program 
Amendments.

Matter To Be Considered At The Closed Portion: Periodic Update of 
Examination Program Development and Supervisory Findings.

Contact Person For More Information: Shelia Willis, Paralegal 
Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3a4babfbfbaa0a093b5bbb5b1fdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4037292c2c29333300262826226e272f36">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: April 2, 2008.

    By the Federal Housing Finance Board.
Neil R. Crowley,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 08-1108 Filed 4-3-08 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6725-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-644]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, NRSA Training Grants.
    Date: March 6, 2007.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Serena P. Chu, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 6154, MSC 9609, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-0004, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#126177717a67527f737b7e3c7c7b7a3c757d64"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bac9dfd9d2cffad7dbd3d694d4d3d294ddd5cc">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 7, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-644 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ANTHONY J. FAILS,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:10cv401–WS/EMT

G.R. BYRD, 

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc.

10) docketed May 21, 2018. The magistrate judge recommends that Plaintiff’s

Motion to Reopen (doc. 9) be denied. Plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 11) to the

report and recommendation. Like the magistrate judge, this court finds that

Plaintiff has failed to establish a basis under Rule 60(b)(4) for reopening a case

that he voluntarily dismissed in 2010.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 10) is
Page 2 of 2

ADOPTED and incorporated into this order by reference.

2. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Reopen Rule 60(b)4" (doc. 9) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of June , 2018.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 19-0587

Filed May 13, 2020

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

MICHAEL PAUL KURNES,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Appanoose County, Rose Anne 

Mefford, District Associate Judge.

Michael Kurnes appeals from his sentence after pleading guilty to operating 

while intoxicated, third offense. AFFIRMED.

Steven E. Goodlow of Goodlow Law Firm, Albia, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Sharon K. Hall, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J., and Doyle and May, JJ.
2

MAY, Judge.

Michael Kurnes pled guilty1to operating while intoxicated, third offense, in 

violation of Iowa Code section 321J.2 (2018). The district court sentenced Kurnes 

to prison.

On appeal, Kurnes contends his trial counsel was ineffective.2 To obtain 

relief, Kurnes must prove “by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) counsel 

failed to perform an essential duty, and (2) prejudice resulted.” State v. Cromer, 

765 N.W.2d 1, 7 (Iowa 2009). “Ordinarily, ineffective assistance of counsel claims 

are best resolved by postconviction proceedings to enable a complete record to 

be developed and afford trial counsel an opportunity to respond to the claim.” State 

v. Truesdell, 679 N.W.2d 611, 616 (Iowa 2004). 

Kurnes’s brief suggests several ways in which he believes counsel was 

ineffective. But we do not find his claims are sufficiently developed for our review. 

So we must preserve his claims for a future postconviction-relief proceeding. See

State v. Harris, 919 N.W.2d 753, 754 (Iowa 2018) (“If the development of the 

ineffective-assistance claim in the appellate brief was insufficient to allow its 

 

1

Iowa Code section 814.6 (2019) was recently amended to prohibit most appeals 

from guilty pleas. See 2019 Iowa Acts ch. 140 § 28. In State v. Macke, however, 

our supreme court held these amendments “apply only prospectively and do not 

apply to cases pending on July 1, 2019.” 933 N.W.2d 226, 228 (Iowa 2019). We 

are bound by our supreme court’s holding. We conclude, therefore, the 

amendments “do not apply” to this case, which was pending on July 1, 2019. See 

id.

2 We recognize Iowa Code section 814.7 (2019) was also recently amended to 

provide in pertinent part: “An ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a criminal 

case shall be determined by filing an application for postconviction relief” and “shall 

not be decided on direct appeal from the criminal proceedings.” See 2019 Iowa 

Acts ch. 140, § 31. But because this appeal was pending on July 1, 2019, the 

amendment “do[es] not apply” to this case. See Macke, 933 N.W.2d at 235.
3

consideration, the court of appeals should not consider the claim, but it should not 

outright reject it.”).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 216 (Thursday, November 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5574]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activity Seeking OMB Approval

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA invites public comments about our intention to request 
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) revision of a current 
information collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day 
comment period soliciting comments on the following collection of 
information was published on August 15, 2007, vol. 72, no. 157, pages 
45861-45862. The FAA collects information from airport sponsors and 
planning agencies in order to administer the Airports Grants Program.

DATES: Please submit comments by December 10, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Mauney at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Airports Grants Program.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0569.
    Form(s): Forms 5100-100, 5100-101, 5100-108, 5100-126, 5100-127, 
5370-1.
    Affected Public: An estimated 1,950 Respondents.
    Frequency: This information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: Approximately 8.6 hours per 
response.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 78,017 hours annually.
    Abstract: The FAA collects information from airport sponsors and 
planning agencies in order to administer the Airports Grants Program. 
Data is used to determine eligibility, ensure proper use of Federal 
Funds, and ensure project accomplishments.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on 
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be 
addressed to Nathan Lesser, Desk Officer, Department of Transportation/
FAA, and sent via electronic mail to [email protected] or 
faxed to (202) 395-6974.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of 
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to 
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, 
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 2, 2007.
Carla Mauney,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business 
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 07-5574 Filed 11-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6349

ENRIQUE FACUNDO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MARK A. HENRY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-98-

3385-MJG)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 25, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Enrique Facundo, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United

States Attorney, George Levi Russell, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Enrique Facundo appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and motion to

reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Facundo v. Henry, No. CA98-3385-MJG (D. Md. Feb. 10 & Mar. 5, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HARRY MICHAEL WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-474-SPM-GRJ

MORRIS YOUNG, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________ /

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion To Dismiss Defendant Kevin

Peterson. (Doc. 19.) Plaintiff requests that the Court dismiss Defendant Kevin

Peterson from this action. In support of his request, Plaintiff advises that the process

server determined Defendant Kevin Peterson is no longer employed by the Gadsden

County Sheriff’s Office. Plaintiff further informs the Court that the process server has

been unable to locate Defendant Kevin Peterson. 

Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), a plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss an action

without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves

either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The effect of such a voluntary

dismissal by a plaintiff is that the dismissal is without prejudice, unless the plaintiff has

previously dismissed any federal or state court action based on or including the same

claim. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(B). 

In this instance, Defendant Kevin Peterson was never served and therefore has

not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. In addition, there is no indication

Plaintiff previously dismissed a federal or state court action based upon or including the

Case 4:10-cv-00474-SPM-GRJ Document 20 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

same claim. Indeed, Plaintiff states in his First Amended Complaint he has not filed

any actions in federal or state court dealing with the same or similar facts or issues

involved in this action. (Doc. 9 at 4.) 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request to dismiss the claims against Defendant Kevin

Peterson without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(I) is due to be granted. 

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion To Dismiss Defendant Kevin Peterson (Doc. 19) is

GRANTED. 

(2) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Kevin Peterson are hereby

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

(3) The Clerk is instructed to make the appropriate notation on the docket. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 5 day of December, 2011. th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00474-SPM-GRJ Document 20 Filed 12/05/11 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 21st meeting of the American Health Information Community Chronic Care Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

January 17, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Eastern Time.

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​chroniccare/​*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will hear testimony on ways to use information technology to better coordinate care for patients with chronic conditions and will discuss this information in light of opportunities to better facilitate patient care coordination.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​chrnoccare/​cc_​instruct.html.*

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-6136  Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-45-M
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TAMPA DIVISION

ROBERT V. ANDERSON, pro se,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 8:10-CV-2235-T-30AEP

FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

Before the Court is plaintiff's civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1983

(Dkt. 1). With his complaint, plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §1915 (Dkt. 2). Plaintiff claims that the Florida Parole Commission violated

his due process and equal protection rights when it overruled a parole examiner’s

recommendation of September 27, 2008, as Plaintiff’s presumed parole release date, and set

Plaintiff’s presumed parole release date as September 27, 2078. Plaintiff’s complaint also

alleges that the statutes “that empower the Commissioner’s actions are constitutionally

infirm[.]” For relief, he essentially asks this Court to find that the Florida Parole

Commission’s actions were unconstitutional, and instruct the Florida Parole Commission to

set a “reasonable” presumed parole release date. 

The appropriate venue provision in this case is 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) which states:

A civil action wherein jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of

citizenship may, except as otherwise provided by law, be brought only in (1)
a judicial district where any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the

same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or

omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property

that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any

defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may

otherwise be brought.

Because Defendant, the Florida Parole Commission, resides in Tallahassee, Florida, and it

appears that the events giving rise to the Plaintiff’s claims occurred there, venue is proper in

the Northern District of Florida. 

ACCORDINGLY, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), this case is transferred to the

United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division, for

all further proceedings, and the Clerk shall immediately terminate any pending motions, close

this case, and forward the file to that District.

DONE and ORDERED in Tampa, Florida on October 7, 2010.

SA:sfc

Copy to: Plaintiff pro se

2
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5583 

AN ACT 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to require 

States to annually report on certain adult health quality 

measures, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5583 EH

1 SECTION 1. MANDATORY REPORTING WITH RESPECT TO 

2 ADULT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH MEASURES. 

3 Section 1139B of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

4 1320b–9b) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (b)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (3)— 

7 (i) by striking ‘‘Not later than Janu8 ary 1, 2013’’ and inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘(A) VOLUNTARY REPORTING.—Not later 

10 than January 1, 2013’’; and 

11 (ii) by adding at the end the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(B) MANDATORY REPORTING WITH RE14 SPECT TO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH MEASURES.— 

15 Beginning with the State report required under 

16 subsection (d)(1) for 2024, the Secretary shall 

17 require States to use all behavioral health meas18 ures included in the core set of adult health 

19 quality measures and any updates or changes to 

20 such measures to report information, using the 

21 standardized format for reporting information 

22 and procedures developed under subparagraph 

23 (A), regarding the quality of behavioral health 

24 care for Medicaid eligible adults.’’; and 

25 (B) in paragraph (5), by adding at the end 

26 the following new subparagraph: 
3 

•HR 5583 EH

1 ‘‘(C) BEHAVIORAL HEALTH MEASURES.— 

2 Beginning with respect to State reports re3 quired under subsection (d)(1) for 2024, the 

4 core set of adult health quality measures main5 tained under this paragraph (and any updates 

6 or changes to such measures) shall include be7 havioral health measures.’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection (d)(1)(A)— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘the such plan’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘such plan’’; and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘subsection (a)(5)’’ and in12 serting ‘‘subsection (b)(5) and, beginning with 

13 the report for 2024, all behavioral health meas14 ures included in the core set of adult health 

15 quality measures maintained under such sub16 section (b)(5) and any updates or changes to 

17 such measures (as required under subsection 

18 (b)(3))’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5583 

AN ACT 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to rehealth quality measures, and for other purposes. quire States to annually report on certain adult