alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
** Exhibit 32.1**

**PRINCIPALEXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Vita FoodProducts, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the dateindicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| Date:  April 17, 2007 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Clifford K.  Bolen                       |
|---------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                            |   |   |   | Clifford K. Bolen,                           |
|                            |   |   |   | President and  Chief Executive Officer       |
|                            |   |   |   | (Principal  Executive and Financial Officer) |
|                            |   |   |   |                                         |
|                            |   |   |   |                                         |

 

 

57

----
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 5, 2014
. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00 546

- CV
TEXAS COMMUNITY DEVE LOPMENT CORP. F/K/A WOODLAND DEVEL OPMENT CORP. , Appellant V. FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI , LLP, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. C C

- 12

- 06695

- E



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang

- Miers, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chi ef Justice Wright The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. In a letter dated June 2 6 , 2014, we notified appellant that the Dallas County Clerk informed the Court that the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid or made arrangem ents to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to file, within ten days of the date of our letter, written verification that it had paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record

. We cautioned appellant that if we did

not received the required documentation within ten days, we might dismiss the appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not provided the required documentation regarding the

status of the clerk’s record nor has it otherwise corresponded with the Court regardi ng this appeal.– 2

– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3 (b),
42.3(b), (c).

140546F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

TEXAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION f/k/a WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant

No. 05

- 14

- 00546

- CV V.

FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP, ET AL., Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. CC

- 12

- 06695

- E. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright, Justices Lang

- Miers and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI, LLP, ET AL. recover its costs of this appeal, if any, from appellant TEXAS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION f/k/a WOODLAND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.

Judgment entered this 5th day of August, 2014.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

VICTOR M

. GONZALEZ VAZQUEZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 30164

D.C. No. 2:10

- cr

- 00324

- RAJ

MEM ORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 19, 2019 **

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Victor M. Gonzalez Vazquez appeals from the district court’s order granting

in part, and denying in part, his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence

reduction. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gonzalez

Vazquez’s counsel has fil ed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 30164

along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided

Gonzalez Vazquez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24
- 6108

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TYRONE MAURICE WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. ( 4:14

- cr - 00043

- FL

- 1 ; 4:18

- cv - 00203

- FL )

Submitted : June 25 , 2024 Decided: June 28, 2024

Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER , Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tyrone Maurice Williams , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6108 Doc: 6 Filed: 06/28/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Maurice Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this stan dard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitution al right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

ar e adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 24-6108 Doc: 6 Filed: 06/28/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the period ended
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacob Hendrik Dissel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/JACOB HENDRIK DISSELJacob Hendrik Dissel
Chief Financial Officer
May 2, 2003


---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Olympic Cascade Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert H. Daskal, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

            (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                 amended; and

            (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                 material respects, the financial condition and results of
                 operations of the Company.




                                                 /s/ Robert H. Daskal
                                                 --------------------
                                                 Robert H. Daskal
                                                 Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                                 December 28, 2004
|   | 1. | Amendment      No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the quarter      ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m      or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| BY:  | /s/      Steven Strasser          |
|-----------|-----------------------------------|
|      | Steven      Strasser              |
|      | Chief      Executive Officer      |
|      | (principal      executiveofficer) |

----
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 8.1

                            SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

As of June 30, 2005, our principal subsidiaries were:

      -     Randfontein Estates Limited,

      -     Evander Gold Mines Limited,

      -     ARMgold/Harmony Freegold Joint Venture Company (Pty) Ltd,

      -     ARMgold Limited,

      -     Avgold Limited,

      -     Kalahari Goldridge Mining Company Limited and

      -     Harmony Gold (Australia) (Pty) Limited.

All are wholly-owned direct subsidiaries incorporated in South Africa, save for
Harmony Gold (Australia) (Pty) Limited, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary
incorporated in Australia.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5458 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require Members of 

Congress to file the reports on transactions in stocks, bonds, commodities 

futures, and other forms of securities which are required under such 

Act not later than 7 days after the transactions are completed, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2018 

Mr. GROTHMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to require 

Members of Congress to file the reports on transactions 

in stocks, bonds, commodities futures, and other forms 

of securities which are required under such Act not later 

than 7 days after the transactions are completed, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Member Financial 

5 Transparency Act’’. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5458 IH

1 SEC. 2. 7-DAY DEADLINE FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO 

2 FILE REPORTS ON TRANSACTIONS IN SECU3 RITIES. 

4 (a) MODIFICATION OF DEADLINE FOR MEMBERS TO

5 FILE REPORTS.—Section 103(l) of the Ethics in Govern6 ment Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App. 103(l)) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘in no case later than 45 days after such trans8 action’’ and inserting ‘‘in no case later than 45 days after 

9 such transaction (or, in the case of a Member of Congress, 

10 in no case later than 7 days after such transaction)’’. 

11 (b) MODIFICATION OF DEADLINE FOR CLERK OF

12 THE HOUSE AND SECRETARY OF THE SENATE TO MAKE

13 REPORTS PUBLIC.—Section 105(b)(1) of such Act (5 

14 U.S.C. App. 105(b)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘within 

15 thirty days’’ and inserting ‘‘within 30 days (or, in the case 

16 of a report of a transaction required to be reported under 

17 section 102(a)(5)(B) which is filed by a Member of Con18 gress, within 10 days)’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply with respect to transactions occur21 ring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
### FEB 17 2015 

# pE.^ot\^/ ^m4sff AS^Aeosfe Nf. 

## TH£ $>4i*te of Tty^e,



# ItateMy -i^W -lofted* -iiond^,^"' -luftiTl -'3 1... 11.t.«.1 rlo.'&1 / Mmli<i%] -i sufeJ" - teo^ ... 

# \woV^SifilfY •*^'M «^«1 ft • T. a . iU(*Rrf-]UHJ t>Rp &^ W -u*ch1-XuoMia"-i wdiuit] -ita' -x^„i +ke* /U<* of" t+HE«fMi+"'om&R*... ;*i -&1 TmW"-tmsowrtlin vwwtt: -So -LTi'iw

# InoT' -UM] ,$^' ?\OT4ifW ilfcitehmtinfj ttftx+l'-. of'" - Jur] i 

# 81 , 35Z-0'#« \ TU'vftll e,*o£-V] d,iuss. Mo .1 :T)| -en -3$r? -&f

fir '
Z\o\ TW\ 3Gfl Al. 

# IJX. M<L\i£V»oft^ .

mtvU on; 1^-oiis. /^ 2(»&'^U loWft 0flftK.TF.XlAC -7&3C.1(17) Beginning on page 6, state concisely every legal ground for your claim that you are being unlawfully restrained, and then briefly summarize the facts supporting each ground. You must present each ground on the form application and a brief summary of the facts. If your grounds and briefsummary ofthefacts have not been presented on theform application, the Court willnot consideryour grounds. If you have more than four grounds, use pages 14 and 15 of the form, which you may copy as many times as needed to give you a separate page for each ground, with each ground numbered in sequence. The recitation of the facts supporting each ground must be no longer than the two pages provided for the ground in the form. You mayinclude with the form a memorandum of law if you want to presentlegal authorities, but the Court will not consider grounds for relief set out in a memorandum of law that were not raised on the form. The citations and argument must be in a memorandum that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 73 and does hot exceed 15,000 words if computer-generated or 50 pages if not. If you 

### are challenging the validity ofyour conviction, please include a summary ofthe facts pertaining to your offense and trial in your memorandum.

%mMl\MH
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Presidential Documents 31923 

Proclamation 8265 of May 30, 2008 

Great Outdoors Month, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

From the Appalachian Mountains to the Grand Canyon, America is blessed 

with places of natural beauty where our citizens can discover the full splendor of this great Nation. During Great Outdoors Month, our Nation celebrates 

the grandeur of our open spaces, strengthens our commitment to preserving 

this heritage, and reaffirms our dedication to protecting our air, water, and 

lands. 

My Administration remains dedicated to wise stewardship of the environment, and we will continue to protect our Nation’s natural wonders. This 

past year, we have made great strides in helping wildlife thrive and in 

restoring habitat for migratory birds through cooperative conservation. Working with State and tribal officials, we are preserving important wildlife 

habitats and expanding the National Wildlife Refuge system. Citizens can 

visit takepride.gov to learn more about opportunities to care for our environment. 

Great Outdoors Month is an opportunity to honor those who work to keep 

our natural places beautiful and to celebrate some of our country’s favorite 

outdoor pastimes. These activities encourage a healthy lifestyle and give 

Americans pride in the great American landscape. As responsible stewards 

of our natural resources, we can help ensure that the great outdoors will 

be available for enjoyment by generations to come. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2008 as Great 

Outdoors Month. I call on all Americans to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities, and to take time to visit and enjoy the 

great outdoors. 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES2
31924 Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 108 / Wednesday, June 4, 2008 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day 

of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence 

of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 08–1323 

Filed 6–3–08; 8:59 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


dwashington3 on PROD1PC69 with NOTICES2GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32(m)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,



|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





|/s/ Joseph F. DominoJoseph F. Domino
Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer 
of Entergy Texas, Inc.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	August 7, 2008
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MIMEDX GROUP, INC. , Petitioner

,

v.

FRASER JOHN PERRING, GABRIEL BERNARDE, AIDAN LAU and

PARKER H. PETIT
, Respondents

.

No. 4D 20

- 573

[ July 1, 2020 ]

Writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No.

CACE 19

- 012805

.

Kathryn Lee Ender and David M. Hawthorne of Lewis Brisbois Bigaard & Smith LLP, Fort Lauderdale, Grace Mead of Sterns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A., Miami, and Isaac Adams and Daniel J. Hay of Sidney Austin LLP, Washington, DC, pro hac vice for petitioner.

Richard M. Elias and Todd Friedman of Elias LLC, St. Louis, M issouri

, for respond ents.

P ER C URIAM

.

MiMedx Group, Inc. (MiMedx) seeks certiorari review of a circuit court order compelling it to produce a report authored by an outside law firm that MiMedx’s audit committee retained to investigate and advise regarding claims of corpora te misconduct. The court departed from the essential requirements of law in overruling its attorney

- client privilege and work product objections without first conducting in camera review. See Am. Airlines, Inc. v. Cimino , 279 So. 3d 200, 202

- 03 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019); Old Holdings, Ltd. v. Taplin, Howard, Shaw & Miller, P.A. , 584 So. 2d 1128, 1128

- 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). We grant this petition, quash the
order

, and remand for further proceedings.

On remand, the court should carefully reconsider its analys is of Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Deason , 632 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1994), as that decision addressed multiple classifications of documents,2 some of which the court ruled were protected from discovery.

Petition granted, order quashed and remanded for further proceedings.

C ONNER
, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              5
                       1,000

<S>                             <C>
Period type                     9 mos                      
Fiscal year end                 12/31/98
Period start                    1/1/98
Period end                      09/30/98
Cash                            23,195
Securities                      693
Receivables                     80,464
Allowances                      (4,585)
Inventory                       7,475
Current assets                  121,986
PP&E                            93,758
Depreciation                    (47,627)
Total assets                    251,166
Current liabilities             74,615
Bonds                           0
Preferred mandatory             0
Preferred                       0
Common                          618
Other SE                        104,425
Total Liability and Equity      251,166
Sales                           330,071
Total Revenue                   330,071
CGS                             233,458
Total costs                     233,458
Other expenses                  77,357
Loss provision                  0
Interest expense                (2,134)
Income pre tax                  18,267
Income tax                      7,788 
Income continuing               10,479
Discontinued                    0    
Extraordinary                   0
Changes                         0
Net income                      10,479
EPS basic                       .99
EPS diluted                     .94


</TABLE>