alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OCT 52009 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON, CLERK 

U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

GREGORY T. HOWARD, 

Plaintiff, 

CivilActionNo. 09 1891 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT : 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT 

OF OHIO, et al., 

Defendants. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

~ This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiffs application to proceed in 

I 

forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application, and will dismiss the 

complaint with prejudice. 

Plaintiff purports to bring this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), see 28 

U.S.C. 5 2671 et seq., against the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, 

the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Ohio, the United States Attorney General, 

the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, and the United States Department of the 

Treasury. Generally, he objects to the decisions of The Hon. Algenon L. Marbley, United States 

District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, in a civil action filed in that district. See Compl. 

77 4-5. Because of Judge Marbley's alleged inappropriate conduct, plaintiff demands damages 

totalling $27,5 19,203.43. See id. 77 5-6. 

Notwithstanding plaintiffs reliance on the FTCA as a basis for this Court's jurisdiction, 

it is clear that plaintiff demands damages in connection with Judge Marbley7s unfavorable 

decisions in cases filed by plaintiff in the Southern District of Ohio. A federal judge is absolutely 
immune from a lawsuit arising from actions taken in his judicial capacity. Forrester v. White, 

484 U.S. 219,225 (1988); Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 355-57 (1978); Sindram v. Suda, 

986 F.2d 1459, 1460 (D.C. Cir. 1993). Accordingly, the Court dismisses the complaint with 

prejudice because it seeks monetary damages against a defendant who is immune from such 

relief. 28 U.S.C. 5 191 5(e)(2)(B)(iii); see Howard v. United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Ohio, No. 09-0531 (CKK), 2009 WL 837642 (D.D.C. Mar. 30, 2009) 

(dismissing sua sponte under 28 U.S.C. 5 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii) a complaint "seek[ing] damages in 

connection with various rulings made by Judge Algenon L. Marbley in a case involving Plaintiff 

in the Federal District Court of the Southern District of Ohio" on the ground that "ljludges are 

absolutely immune from lawsuits predicated on acts taken, as alleged here, in their judicial 

capacities"), aff'd, No. 09-5139,2009 WL 2981979 (D.C. Cir. July 10,2009). 

An Order consistent with this Memorandum is issued separately on this same date. 

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000202932
<NAME> PRO-FAC COOPERATIVE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-23-1995
<CASH>                                            6188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    71974
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     211590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                309738
<PP&E>                                          277035
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  719686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           192953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              255
<PREFERRED>                                      76083
<COMMON>                                          9441
<OTHER-SE>                                       46298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     71986
<SALES>                                         373364
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                373364
<CGS>                                           279141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    83023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               21005
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (9805)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2711)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7094)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (7094)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
# Italian Independence Day, 2008

On Italian Independence Day, we recognize our friendship with the nation of Italy, and we celebrate the generations of Italian Americans who have made significant contributions to our national character. 

June 2, 1946, marks the birth of the Italian Republic, the long-awaited triumph of liberty and democracy in an ancient land. Today, Italy is a friend of the United States and an ally of freedom and peace. Italians and Americans join together on Italian Independence Day to commemorate Italy's independence and celebrate its rich history. 

The people of our two countries share special ties rooted in history, friendship, and family. Millions of American citizens have Italian ancestry, and they and their forebears have helped shape our way of life. Americans are grateful for the many contributions Italians and Italian Americans have made to our history and our culture, and we are proud that our nations are allies in the cause of peace and security around the world. 

In celebrating Italian Independence Day, we commemorate the freedoms our countries hold dear, and we honor the generations of Italian Americans who came to our shores seeking opportunity. They have helped to shape our great Nation and influenced American life for the better. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2, 2008, as Italian Independence Day. I call upon all Americans to observe this day by celebrating the contributions of Italians and Italian Americans to our Nation. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 08-1324

Billing code 3195-01-P
Order filed May 31, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00330-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF C.J.S. and S.G.B., JR., Children

On Appeal from the 315th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2009-09041J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of 

the parent-child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”). Appellant=s brief 

was due May 28, 2012. No brief has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with the clerk of this court within 10 days of the date 

of this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
#### State of West Virginia *v.*R. A. W.

(No. 14263)

Decided July 8, 1980.

*265
      *Mark C. Campbell*for plaintiff-in-error.

*Chauncey H. Browning,*Attorney General, *Gray Silver, III,*Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-in-error.

Per Curiam:

After finding that R. A. W., the appellant, a juvenile, had participated in the grand larceny of a Ford Van, the Circuit Court of Logan County sentenced her to the Industrial School for Girls at Salem. On appeal she contends that there was insufficient evidence adduced at her trial to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that she was guilty of grand larceny. We disagree.

The evidence in this case shows that a Ford Van was stolen from Estelle Murray by two hitchhikers. Mr. Murray identified the appellant as one of the hitchhikers. When the van was located by the police, the appellant was found present in it, asleep. The appellant admitted that she was one of the two hitchhikers, and although she testified that her partner had actually driven the van away, her testimony indicated that she had assented to the act.

In Syllabus Point 3 of *State v. Franklin,*139 W.Va. 43, 79 S.E.2d 692 (1953), we said:

> “A person who is present, aiding and abetting another in the commission of an offense, is a principal in the second degree within the meaning of Code, 61-11-1, which provides, in part: Tn the case of every felony, every principal in the second degree, and every accessory before the fact, shall be punishable as if he were the principal in the first degree.’ *”*

After carefully examining the record we conclude that it shows beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant was present, aiding and abetting in the theft of the Ford Van.

The judgment of the Circuit Court of Logan County is, therefore, affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

# TIME AND DATE:

11:30 a.m., Monday, April 14, 2008.

# PLACE:

Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C Streets, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20551.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1.  Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, reassignments, and salary actions) involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.

2.  Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-2955.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                        You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at                         *http://www.federalreserve.gov*                         for an electronic announcement that not only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other information about the meeting.                    

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, April 4, 2008.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 08-1117 Filed 4-7-08; 11:41 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,322
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,614,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,616,336
<INVENTORY>                                  4,653,480
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,678,835
<PP&E>                                       2,040,389
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,067,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,055,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,912,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,540
<OTHER-SE>                                   (481,392)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,055,848
<SALES>                                     16,545,159
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,545,159
<CGS>                                       13,908,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,394,235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,483
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,587,861
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             752,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,768,785)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,768,785)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,768,785)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.08)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 12 (Thursday, January 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 3260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-132]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Statistical Data Coordinating 
Center.
    Date: February 4, 2008.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Paul A. Amstad, PhD., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, DHHS/
National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-402-7098, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5525343826213431153b3c343c317b3b3c3d7b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96e6f7fbe5e2f7f2d6f8fff7fff2b8f8fffeb8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 9, 2008.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 08-132 Filed 1-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Hanover Insurance Company ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912QR-09-D-0045 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61481 

Eric J. Hughes, Esq. 

Rory M. Farrell, Esq. 

Kyle H. Cassidy, Esq. 

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & 

Carpenter, LLP 

Morristown, NJ 

Michael P. Goodman, Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Deena G. Braunstein, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The appeal has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: October 4, 2018 

rative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61481, Appeal of Hanover Insurance Company, 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

 11 a.m., Friday, May 30, 2008. 

# Place:

 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. 

# Status:

 Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084. 

David A. Stawick, 

Secretary of the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 08-1160 Filed 4-16-08; 4:02 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7404

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TYRONE IGNATIUS GREENFIELD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-123-A)

Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 22, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Ignatius Greenfield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Ignatius Greenfield seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Greenfield’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss

the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United

States v. Greenfield, No. CR-93-123-A (E.D. Va. June 12, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2011234EN.01000201.xml

| 10.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6322 — Carlyle/RAC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 234/03

On 3 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6322. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6322. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Vita Food Products, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in thecapacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2006 |   | By:    | /s/    Stephen D. Rubin |   |
|----------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                 |   |   | Stephen  D. Rubin,                |   |
|                 |   |   | President                         |   |
|                 |   |   | (Principal Executive  Officer)    |   |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Westside Energy Corporation (the Company) on Form 10 KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |     |  |                        
|-------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|April 29, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Sean J. Austin     
|               |  |     |  | Sean J. Austin,        
|               |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer