Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Notices 8347 

1Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse 

and the President, through Executive Order 13222 

of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), 

as extended by the Notice of August 3, 2006 (71 FR 

44551, Aug. 7, 2006), has continued the Regulations 

in effect under the International Emergency 

Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706 (2000)) 

(‘‘IEEPA’’). 

2The Regulations are currently codified at 15 CFR 

Parts 730–774 (2006). 

Any party having a substantial 

interest in these proceedings may 

request a public hearing on the matter. 

A written request for a hearing must be 

submitted to the Office of Performance 

Evaluation, Room 7009, Economic 

Development Administration, U.S. 

Department of Commerce, Washington, 

DC 20230, no later than ten (10) 

calendar days following publication of 

this notice. Please follow the procedures 

set forth in Section 315.9 of EDA’s final 

rule (71 FR 56704) for procedures for 

requesting a public hearing. The Catalog 

of Federal Domestic Assistance official 

program number and title of the 

program under which these petitions are 

submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

Dated: February 20, 2007. 

William P. Kittredge, 

Program Officer for TAA. 

[FR Doc. E7–3174 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–24–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Action Affecting Export Privileges; 

Erika P. Jardine, aka Eriklynn Pattie 

Jardine, aka Erika Pattie Jardine; In the 

Matter of: Erika P. Jardine, aka 

Eriklynn Pattie Jardine, aka Erika 

Pattie Jardine, P.O. Box 3633, Vista, 

CA 92085; Order Denying Export 

Privileges 

A. Denial of Export Privileges of Erika 

P. Jardine 

On February 22, 2006, in the U.S. 

District Court in the Eastern District of 

Pennsylvania, following a plea of guilty, 

Erika P. Jardine (‘‘Jardine’’) was 

convicted of violating Section 38 of the 

Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

2778 (2000)) (‘‘AECA’’), Jardine pled 

guilty of willfully exporting and 

attempting to export and causing to 

export, from the United States to 

European Countries, defense articles, 

that is small arm protective inserts 

(SAPIs), which were designated as 

defense articles on the United States 

Munitions List, without having first 

obtained from the Department of State a 

license for such export or written 

authorization for such export. 

In addition to the violation of the 

AECA, Jardine was convicted of theft 

and selling of U.S. property, in violation 

of 18 U.S.C. 641(2000). Jardine was 

sentenced to six months imprisonment 

followed by three years of supervised 

release and fined $6,500. Her scheduled 

release date is February 28, 2007. 

Section 11(h) of the Export 

Administration Act of 1979, as amended 

(currently codified at 50 U.S.C. app. 

2401–2420 (2000))(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Section 

766.25 of the Export Administration 

Regulations 2 provide, in pertinent part, 

that ‘‘[t]he Director of Exporter Services, 

in consultation with the Director of the 

Office of Export Enforcement, may deny 

export privileges of any person who has 

been convicted of a violation of * * * 

Section 38 of the Arms Export Control 

Act,’’ for a period not to exceed 10 years 

from the date of conviction. 15 CFR 

766.25(a) and (d). In addition, Section 

750.8 of the Regulations states that BIS’s 

Office of Exporter Services may revoke 

any BIS licenses previously issued in 

which the person had an interest in at 

the time of his conviction. 

I have received notice of Jardine’s 

conviction for violating the AECA, and 

have provided notice and an 

opportunity for Jardine to make a 

written submission to the Bureau of 

Industry and Security as provided in 

Section 766.25 of the Regulations. I have 

also received a written submission from 

Jardine explaining why she does not 

believe a 10 year denial is appropriate 

and have decided, following 

consideration of her submission and 

consultations with the Office of Export 

Enforcement, including the Director, 

Office of Export Enforcement, to deny 

Jardine’s export privileges under the 

Regulations for a period of seven years 

from the date of Jardine’s conviction. 

Accordingly, it is hereby Ordered: 

1. Until February 22, 2013, Erika 

Jardine, aka Eriklynn Pattie Jardine, aka 

Erika Pattie Jardine, P.O. Box 3633, 

Vista, CA 92085, and when acting for or 

on behalf of Jardine, her representatives, 

assigns, agents, or employees, 

(collectively referred to hereinafter as 

the ‘‘Denied Person’’) may not, directly 

or indirectly, participate in any way in 

any transaction involving any 

commodity, software or technology 

(hereinafter collectively referred to as 

‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from 

the United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, or in any other activity 

subject to the Regulations, including, 

but not limited to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

II. No person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

III. After notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Erika Jardine by 

affiliation, ownership, control, or 

position of responsibility in the conduct 

of trade or related services may also be 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
8348 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Notices 

1A public version of the Initiation Checklist is 

available on the public record in the Department’s 

Central Records Unit (≥CRU≥) (room B-099). 

made subject to the provisions of this 

Order. 

IV. This Order does not prohibit any 

export, reexport, or other transaction 

subject to the Regulations where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin 

technology. 

V. This Order is effective immediately 

and shall remain in effect until February 

22, 2013. 

VI. In accordance with Part 756 of the 

Regulations, Jardine may file an appeal 

of this Order with the Under Secretary 

of Commerce for Industry and Security. 

The appeal must be filed within 45 days 

from the date of this Order and must 

comply with the provisions of Part 756 

of the Regulations. 

VII. A copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to Jardine. This Order shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Dated: February 9, 2007. 

Eileen M. Albanese, 

Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 07–842 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–485–806] 

Notice of Extension of Time Limit for 

the Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Certain Hot–

Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from 

Romania 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 26, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Dirstine, AD/CVD Operations 

Office 5, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 

482–4033. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 23, 2006, the Department 

of Commerce (the Department) 

published its preliminary results of 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain hot–

rolled carbon steel flat products from 

Romania. See Cetain Hot–Rolled Carbon 

Steel Flat Products from Romania: 

Preliminary Results of the Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 

62082 (October 23, 2006). The period of 

review is November 1, 2004, through 

October 31, 2005. The final results of 

review are currently due no later than 

February 20, 2007. 

Extension of Time Limit for Final 

Results 

The Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), provides at section 

751(a)(3)(A) that the Department will 

issue the final results of an 

administrative review of an 

antidumping duty order within 120 

days after the date on which the 

preliminary determination is published. 

Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act provides 

further that, if the Department 

determines that it is not practicable to 

complete the review within this time 

period, the Department may extend the 

120-day period to 180 days. 

The Department has determined that 

it is not practicable to complete the 

preliminary results by the current 

deadline of February 20, 2007, because 

it has extended the briefing schedule for 

interested parties and needs additional 

time to consider the issues raised in 

case and rebuttal briefs. 

Therefore, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2), the Department is 

extending the time limit for the 

preliminary results by 45 days to April 

6, 2007. 

We are issuing this notice in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Act. 

Dated: February 16, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–3235 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–489–502] 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing 

Duty New Shipper Review: Certain 

Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe 

from Turkey 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is conducting a new 

shipper review of the countervailing 

duty (‘‘CVD’’) order on certain welded 

carbon steel standard pipe from Turkey 

for the period January 1, 2005, through 

December 31, 2005. We preliminarily 

find that the net subsidy rate for the 

company under review is de minimis. 

See the ‘‘Preliminary Results of Review’’

section of this notice, infra. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. See the ‘‘Public 

Comment’’ section, infra. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 26, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kristen Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 3, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4793. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 7, 1986, the Department 

published in the Federal Register the 

CVD order on certain welded carbon 

steel pipe and tube products from 

Turkey. See Countervailing Duty Order: 

Certain Welded Carbon Steel Pipe and 

Tube Products from Turkey, 51 FR 7984 

(March 7, 1986). On March 30, 2006, the 

Department received a request from 

Toscelik Profil ve Sac Endustrisi A.S. 

and its affiliated export trading 

company, Tosyali Dis Ticaret A.S. 

(collectively referred to as ‘‘Toscelik’’), 

a producer and exporter of subject 

merchandise, to initiate a new shipper 

review. On May 2, 2006, the Department 

initiated a CVD new shipper review 

covering the period January 1, 2005, 

through December 31, 2005. See Certain 

Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe 

from Turkey: Notice of Initiation of 

Countervailing Duty New Shipper 

Review, 71 FR 25814 (May 2, 2006); see 

also, Memorandum to the File, ‘‘Request 

for CVD New Shipper Review: Certain 

Welded Carbon Steel Standard Pipe 

from Turkey,’’ (April 26, 2006) 

(‘‘Initiation Checklist’’).1

On May 8, 2006, the Department 

issued a questionnaire to Toscelik and 

the Government of the Republic of 

Turkey (‘‘the GOT’’); we received the 

GOT’s questionnaire response on July 6, 

2006, and Toscelik’s response on July 

10, 2006. On September 6, 2006, we 

issued supplemental questionnaires to 

Toscelik and the GOT. We received 

Toscelik’s and the GOT’s supplemental 

questionnaire responses on October 13, 

2006. 

On September 20, 2006, the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register an extension of the deadline for 

the preliminary results of this new 

shipper review. See Certain Welded 

Carbon Steel Standard Pipe from 

Turkey: Extension of Time Limit for 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES