alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

September 1, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00112-CV

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant

V.

ELIZABETH PHILLIPS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE 

OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES ALSANDOR (DECEASED); TEDDIE 

PHILLIPS; TERRY PHILLIPS, JR.; DEBRA PHILLIPS; OLIVIA PINEDA; 

LINDA PITRA; JUNE POLK, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF GLORIA FLUCKER 

(DECEASED); DAVID PORTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DONNA PORTER 

(DECEASED); MARL HOLLIMON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CLARENCE HOLLIMON 

(DECEASED); LERA HOLMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES HOLMAN 

(DECEASED); LESSIE MAE HUGHES, RUTH HULETT, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BYRON HULETT, JR. 

(DECEASED); JOSEPH HUMAN; CAROLYN JAMES; DEBORAH 

JONES-CULMER; DEXTER JOSEPH, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF HAROLD HUGHES, SR. 

(DECEASED); URAN JUSTICE; JOHN JUSTICE; MELVIN KINDS; 
JACQUELINE KNOTTS; DOROTHY LACKEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CHARLES LACKEY 

(DECEASED); GLORIA LAFNETTE; TERRELL LANDRY, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

VIOLA M. LANDRY (DECEASED); MICAHEL R. LANCASTER, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

MARY HELEN LANCASTER (DECEASED); DANIEL LASTRAPE; 

MICHAEL LEWIS; RUTH LOCKETT; LINDA LOPEZ; SAN JUANA 

LOREDO; NICOLE LYNN; DELMA MAGANA; CARL MAJOR; RAY 

CHARLES MARSHALL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE 

OF ORA MAE MARSHALL (DECEASED); ULISES MARTIN; KAREN 

MARTIN; CORINE MAYERS; EMMA MCCLELLAN; DELORES 

MCGRUDER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE

ESTATES OF LOIS D. TYLER WARD (DECEASED) AND MURRY 

ALLEN MCCLAIR (DECEASED); DMITRI MELENDEZ, INDIVIDUALLY 

AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF ROSA MELENDEZ 

(DECEASED); MICHAEL MELENDEZ; RUTH C. MELENDEZ, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF 

ROSA MELENDEZ (DECEASED); GLORIA MIER-CARRENO; SAMUEL 

MILAZZO, JR., INDIVIDUALLY AND A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF SAMUEL MILAZZO, SR. (DECEASED); RHONDA MILLER; 

SHARON MITCHELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF 

JOYCE JACKSON TAYLOR (DECEASED); RALPH MITCHELL, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF

THEO P. MITCHELL (DECEASED); IRENE MONTGOMERY; SALENA 

MORALES REGINA MORGAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATES OF LAWRENCE MARTIN, SR., 

(DECEASED) AND PAULINE MARTIN (DECEASED); EDWARD 

MOSLEY; AND JOE DOUGLAS HARRISON, Appellees

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-50604

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is a statutory interlocutory appeal from an order signed February 23, 

2021. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 27.003, 51.015(12). On August 
23, 2022, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(1). The motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Spain, Poissant, and Wilson.

2
**Exhibit 13.1**

 
| BASF  Aktiengesellschaft |   |  |
|--------------------------|--------|--|

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

In connection with the Annual Report onForm 20-F of BASF Aktiengesellschaft, a German corporation (“the Company”)for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on March 14, 2007 (the “Report”) theundersigned, Dr. Jürgen Hambrecht, Chairman of the Board of ExecutiveDirectors of BASF Aktiengesellschaft, hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to his knowledge:

1.               The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: March 6, 2007 |   |   |   |                               |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                      |   |   |   |                               |
|                      |   |        |   |                                    |
|                      |   |   | Name:  | Dr. Jürgen Hambrecht     |
|                      |   |   | Title: | Chairman of the Board of Executive |
|                      |   |   |   | Directors                          |

 

 

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-10809

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DERRICK JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CR-70-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Derrick Johnson

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Johnson has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-10809 Document: 00513472384 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-10809

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-10809 Document: 00513472384 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 4:11cv299-RH/WCS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ERIC SEYMOUR WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv299-RH/WCS

BRAD JOHNSON, OFFICER J. LEMAIR,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 6. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is DISMISSED 

without prejudice for failure to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.” 

The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on September 30, 2011.

Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00299-RH-WCS Document 8 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 1
#### James J. HAZEL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16086.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

July 23, 1965.

Gene I. Mesh (Court-Appointed), Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Boyce F. Martin, Jr., U. S. Atty., Louisville, Ky., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS and EDWARDS, Circuit Judges, and BOYD, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James J. Hazel, appeals from the District Court’s denial of his petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to have vacated a sentence imposed upon him following his conviction under Section 4742(a) and 4744(a) of Title 26 U.S.C.A. for illegal possession and sale of marijuana. On the trial date the appellant, represented by Court appointed counsel, entered a guilty plea and, having been formerly convicted for the same offense, was given a ten year sentence under the mandatory provisions of Title 26, Section 7237(a) U.S.C.A. Thereafter appellant filed a motion under Section 2255 to have vacated this sentence, his contentions being that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at the time of his arraignment and the entry of the guilty plea aforesaid, and that his plea was not entered voluntarily and understandingly following a determination by the Court in accordance with the mandate of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The Court has reviewed the entire record of these proceedings and finds no conduct on the part of Court appointed counsel at any stage of the same which could be construed as ineffective assistance. Defense counsel was a well qualified and experienced member of the Kentucky Bar and his services in appellant’s behalf were at all times quite adequate. O’Malley v. United States, 285 F.2d 733, 734 (C.A. 6, 1961); United States v. Shields, 291 F.2d 798 (C.A. 6), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 933, 82 S.Ct. 371, 7 L.Ed. 2d 196; Perry v. United States, 292 F.2d 476 (C.A. 6), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 906, 82 S.Ct. 187, 7 L.Ed.2d 100; Scott v. United States, 334 F.2d 72 (C.A. 6, 1964), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 879, 82 S.Ct. 128, 7 L.Ed.2d 79. The appellant’s contention that the District Judge did not adhere to the mandate of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure is also clearly refuted by the record.

There being no reversible error, it follows the judgment of the District Court dismissing the appellant’s petition under Section 2255 herein is affirmed.
# C_2009075EN.01001301.xml

| 31.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 March 2009

(2009/C 75/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3193 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4488 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,92910 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9662 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5159 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9510 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,469 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7096 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7260 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2238 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2352 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9386 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6533 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2250 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3448 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0055 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 848,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,8433 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0893 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4850 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 244,51 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8560 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,980 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,8913 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,257 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0608 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,1611 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,9640 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3193

JPY

Japanese yen

127,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4488

GBP

Pound sterling

0,92910

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9662

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5159

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9510

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,469

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7096

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7260

RON

Romanian leu

4,2238

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2352

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9386

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6533

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2250

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3448

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0055

KRW

South Korean won

1 848,04

ZAR

South African rand

12,8433

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0893

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4850

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 244,51

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8560

PHP

Philippine peso

63,980

RUB

Russian rouble

44,8913

THB

Thai baht

47,257

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0608

MXN

Mexican peso

19,1611

INR

Indian rupee

67,9640

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Golf Trust of America, Inc.

|Date: March 29, 2004 |  |                                                                                    
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/W. BRADLEY BLAIR, IIW. Bradley Blair, II President and Chief Executive Officer  
|Date: March 29, 2004 |  |                                                                                    
|                     |  | /s/SCOTT D. PETERSScott D. Peters Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

---

QuickLinks
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior National Park Service
 AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Public notice.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to the terms of existing concession contracts, public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service intends to request a continuation of visitor services for a period not to exceed 1 year from the date of contract expiration.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         January 1, 2007.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The contracts listed below have been extended to the maximum allowable under 36 CFR 51.23. Under the provisions of current concession contracts and pending the completion of the public solicitation of a prospectus for a new concession contract, the National Park Service authorizes continuation of visitor services for a period not to exceed 1 year under the terms and conditions of the current contract as amended. The continuation of operations does not affect any rights with respect to selection for award of a new concession contract. CONCID No.
Concessioner name
ParkBLRI002-83
Northwest Trading Post, Inc.
Blue Ridge Parkway.BLRI001-93
Southern Highland Handicraft Guild
Blue Ridge Parkway.BLRI007-82
Forever NPC Resorts, LLC
Blue Ridge Parkway.BUIS015-98
MileMark, Inc.
Buck Island Reef National Monument.CAHA001-98
Avon-Thornton Limited Partnership
Cape Hatteras National Seashore.CAHA002-98
Cape Hatteras Fishing Pier, Inc.
Cape Hatteras National Seashore.CAHA003-84
Hatteras Island Motel Limited Partnership
Cape Hatteras National Seashore.CAHA004-98
Oregon Inlet Fishing Center, Inc.
Cape Hatteras National Seashore.CALO003-98
Morris Marina, Kabin Kamps & Ferry Service, Inc.
Cape Lookout National Seashore.EVER001-80
Xanterra Parks and Resorts, Inc.
Everglades National Park.EVER002-82
Everglades National Park Boat Tours, Inc.
Everglades National Park.EVER005-89
Florida National Parks & Monuments Assoc.
Everglades National Park.FOSU001-86
Fort Sumter Tours, Inc.
Fort Sumter National Monument.GRSM002-83
Leconte Lodge Limited Partnership
Great Smoky Mountains National Park.MACA002-82
Forever Resorts, LLC/Forever Resorts, Inc.
Mammoth Cave National Park.VIIS001-71
Caneel Bay, Inc.
Virgin Islands National Park.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         January 1, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo A. Pendry, Concession Program Manager, National Park Service, Washington, DC 20240, Telephone, 202/513-7156. Dated: December 16, 2006. John Wessels, Acting Assistant Director, Business Services.


[FR Doc. 07-662  Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-53-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 41 (Friday, March 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9543]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-958]



[[Page 9543]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Amended Notice of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, March 6, 2007, 
1 p.m. to March 6, 2007, 3 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal 
Register on February 21, 2007, FR 07-761.
    The meeting date was changed from March 6, 2007 to March 29, 2007 
and the Panel name was changed from Research Demonstration and 
Dissemination Projects (R18) to Demonstration and Education Research 
(R18). The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: February 26, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-958 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

NANCY CUSSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:11cv87-SPM/GRJ

ILLUMINATIONS I, INC.,

a Florida corporation,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER APPROVING CONSENT DECREE

AND REFERENCE TO U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This cause comes before the Court upon the Joint Request for Entry of

Consent Decree and Reference to U.S. Magistrate Judge (doc. 46). The parties

jointly move the Court to approve the Consent Decree and retain jurisdiction over

this matter for the enforcement of the Consent Decree. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636, the parties also jointly move that this matter be referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge for the issue of determining the amount of attorney’s fees,

litigation expenses, and costs to be awarded to Plaintiff’s counsel, as set forth in

the Consent Decree, and for entry of final judgment thereon. The parties have

agreed on the issue of entitlement in the Consent Decree and respectfully

request the Court determine the amount of attorney’s fees, litigation expenses,

and costs to be awarded to Plaintiff’s counsel. Accordingly, it is

Case 1:11-cv-00087-GRJ Document 47 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Consent Decree (doc. 46-1) is approved. The Court retains

jurisdiction over this matter for the enforcement of the Consent

Decree.

2. The Clerk is directed to refer this matter to a United States

Magistrate Judge for determination of the amount of attorney’s

fees, litigation expenses, and costs to be awarded to Plaintiff’s

counsel and for entry of final judgment thereon.

3. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

4. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

-2-

Case 1:11-cv-00087-GRJ Document 47 Filed 07/19/12 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5401 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5401

To amend title 41, United States Code, to require executive agencies to 
  give priority to entities with on-site child care for employees in 
          awarding certain contracts, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2018

 Mr. Krishnamoorthi (for himself, Ms. Lofgren, Ms. Norton, Mr. Johnson 
of Georgia, Mr. DeSaulnier, Ms. Moore, Mr. Heck, Ms. Velazquez, and Ms. 
Wilson of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 41, United States Code, to require executive agencies to 
  give priority to entities with on-site child care for employees in 
          awarding certain contracts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Child Care at Responsible Employers 
Act'' or the ``Child CARE Act''.

SEC. 2. PRIORITY TO ENTITIES WITH ON-SITE CHILD CARE FOR EMPLOYEES.

    (a) Priority to Entities With On-Site Child Care for Employees.--
            (1) In general.--Chapter 63 of title 41, United States 
        Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 
        section:
``Sec. 6310. Priority to entities with on-site child care for employees
    ``(a) In General.--In awarding a contract for an amount exceeding 
$4,000,000, an executive agency shall give priority to any entity with 
on-site child care for the employees of the entity.
    ``(b) Relationship to Other Contracting Preferences.--In awarding a 
contract described in subsection (a), an executive agency may not give 
priority to an offer from an entity described in such subsection over 
an offer from a small business concern (as defined in section 3 of the 
Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)).
    ``(c) Executive Agency Defined.--In this section, the term 
`executive agency' has the meaning given that term in section 102 of 
title 40.''.
            (2) Clerical amendment.--The table of sections at the 
        beginning of such chapter is amended by adding at the end the 
        following new item:

``6310. Priority to entities with on-site child care for employees.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a)(1) shall 
apply with respect to contracts awarded on or after December 31, 2019.
                                 <all>
```