alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; The NIDDK Central Data Repository Contract Review.                    

*Date:*                         January 22, 2008.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m.to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Xiaodu Guo, MD, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 761, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-4719,                         *guox@extra.niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 14, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-6139  Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### MANUFACTURING CO. v. MANUFACTURING CO.

No. 12 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 347.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 April 1980.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 91 (Friday, May 9, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 26451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1241]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

File No. 500-1


In the Matter of: ABS Group, Inc. (n/k/a The Motion Picture 
Group, Inc.), Accrue Software, Inc., iAsiaworks, Inc., Premier Laser 
Systems, Inc., Siskon Gold Corp., and Syquest Technology, Inc. (n/k/a 
SYQT, Inc.); Order of Suspension of Trading

May 7, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
ABS Group, Inc. (n/k/a The Motion Picture Group, Inc.), because it has 
not filed any periodic reports since the period ended June 30, 1998.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Accrue Software, Inc., because it has not filed any periodic reports 
since the period ended December 28, 2002.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
iAsiaworks, Inc., because it has not filed any periodic reports since 
the period ended September 30, 2001.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Premier Laser Systems, Inc., because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since the period ended December 31, 1999.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Siskon Gold Corp., because it has not filed any periodic reports since 
the period ended December 31, 1997.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Syquest Technology, Inc. (n/k/a SYQT, Inc.), because it has not filed 
any periodic reports since the period ended June 30, 1998.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the 
above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT 
on May 7, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 20, 2008.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 08-1241 Filed 5-7-08; 10:47 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
EXHIBIT
32





SLAP,
INC.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SLAP, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kelly Warrack, CFO and
Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      June 17, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/
      Kelly WarrackName:
      Kelly WarrackTitle:
      Secretary/Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial
      Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the
United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.)
<PAGE>   1


EXHIBIT  21. SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

The following is a list of the active subsidiaries of the Company as of April 7,
2000, indicating the jurisdiction of incorporation of each and the names under
which such subsidiaries conduct business.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

         NAME OF BUSINESS (% ownership)                   JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
         ------------------------------                   -----------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>
         Controlled Distribution Systems Inc.             Delaware
</TABLE>

Not included above are other subsidiaries which, if considered in the aggregate
as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary, as such
term is defined by Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
# C_2011361EN.01001501.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 361/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 361/15

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 361/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 21.11.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 21.11.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | The Netherlands |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SRX/07D. |
| Species | Skates and rays (Rajidae) |
| Zone | EU waters of VIId |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

21.11.2011

Duration

21.11.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

The Netherlands

Stock or Group of stocks

SRX/07D.

Species

Skates and rays (Rajidae)

Rajidae

Zone

EU waters of VIId

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 10809 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

DERRICK JOHNSON

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:13

- CR

- 70

- 1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Derrick Johnson

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Johnson h a s not filed a response. W e have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 20 , 2016
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-10809 Document: 00513472384 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016No. 15

- 10809

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw

is GRA NTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-10809 Document: 00513472384 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY P.X. BOTHWELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

JOHN O. BRENNAN, Director, Central 

Intelligence Agency, United States of 

America; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE 

AGENCY,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-17323

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-05439-JSC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jacqueline Scott Corley, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted January 18, 2017***

Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Anthony P.X. Bothwell, an attorney, appeals pro se from the district court’s

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See

28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-17323 

summary judgment in his action alleging violations of the Freedom of Information 

Act (“FOIA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo,

Animal Legal Def. Fund v. U.S. Food & Drug Admin., 836 F.3d 987, 990 (9th Cir. 

2016), and we affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Bothwell’s FOIA 

requests for records pertaining to Jean Souetre because, even if the articles 

Bothwell submitted were admissible, they did not establish a genuine dispute of 

material fact as to whether the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”) waived the 

application of FOIA Exemption 3. See Pickard v. Dep’t of Justice, 653 F.3d 782, 

786 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth criteria for determining whether a fact is deemed 

“officially acknowledged”). We reject as without merit Bothwell’s contentions

regarding redaction of records and the CIA’s alleged error in failing to consider the

public interest before invoking Exemption 3. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Bothwell’s FOIA 

requests for records pertaining to David Morales because Bothwell did not raise a 

genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the CIA’s search for responsive 

records was inadequate. See Lahr v. Nat’l Transp. Safety Bd., 569 F.3d 964, 987-

89 (9th Cir. 2009) (concluding that agency’s declarations established that it 
3 15-17323 

conducted searches reasonably calculated to uncover responsive records and the 

agency’s failure to produce or identify a few isolated documents was insufficient to 

show its searches were inadequate). Bothwell’s contentions regarding the CIA’s 

prior disclosure of certain records and alleged error in failing to consider the public 

interest are inapposite because the CIA did not invoke an exemption in response to 

Bothwell’s FOIA request pertaining to Morales.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Glenn C. Worman, certify that:

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of National Holdings Corporation; and  |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: January 28, 2020 | By:    | /s/ Glenn C. Worman         |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                   |   | **Glenn C. Worman**         |
|                   |   | **Chief Financial Officer** |
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 60177 Summary Calendar

SHERMAN OBY , Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
OFFICER COREY SANDER , Defendant

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:14

- CV

- 45

Before 

### HIGGINBOTHAM, HO, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sherman Oby, Mississippi prisoner #45397 , appeals the damages awarded by the district court following the entry of a default judgment against Officer Corey Sander s in t his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 proceeding. After Oby testified
at a hearing, the district court awarded him $100 in nominal damages , but it declined to award either compensatory or punitive damages.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 1, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-60177 Document: 00515140329 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/01/2019No. 17

- 60177

2 Oby first argues that the district court erred in declining to award compensatory damages. He argues that, if he failed to provide sufficient
evidence for such damages, he should have be en all owed to supplement or amend his complaint. However, the record establishes that Oby received multiple opportunities to set forth his claims and evidence in the district court. Next, Oby correctly argues that compensatory damages may be awarded for
more t han out

- of

- pocket expenses, including for impairment of reputation, humiliation, or mental anguish. See, e.g. , Memphis Cmty. Sch. Dist. v. Stachura , 477 U.S. 299 , 307 (1986). However, Oby did not assert a claim for damages on these grounds in the district court. The primary issue Oby raises is the district court’s conclusion that punitive damages were not warranted. “Punitive damages may be awarded in § 1983 cases ‘when the defendant’s conduct is shown to be motivated by evil motive or intent, or when it involves reckless or callous indifference to the federally protected rights of others.’” Heaney v. Roberts , 846 F.3d 795, 803 (5th Cir. 2017) (quoting Smith v. Wade , 461 U.S. 30, 56 (1983)). We review a district court’s determination on punitive damages deferentially; reversal of the district court’s decision is not required even where a party has made a showing justifying punitive damages. Heaney , 846 F.3d at 803. Even if the district court’s conclusion that Officer Sander s used constitutional ly excessive force equates to a threshold finding of evil intent or callous indifference, see Smith, 461 U.S. at 53

- 54 & n.17 , the court did no abuse its discretion by ultimately conclud ing that punitive damages were unwarranted in this case , s ee Heaney , 8 46 F.3d at 803. AFFIRMED. Case: 17-60177 Document: 00515140329 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/01/2019
# Designation of Officers of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

# Memorandum for the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation

                        By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345,                         *et seq*., it is hereby ordered that:                    

**Section 1.***Order of Succession*. During any period when the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (Director) has died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of the Director, the following officials of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in the order listed, shall perform the functions and duties of the office of the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, until such time as the Director is able to perform the functions and duties of the office of Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation:                    

(a) Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

(b) Associate Deputy Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation;

(c)Executive Assistant Director of the National Security Branch;

(d) Executive Assistant Director for Criminal, Cyber, Response and Services; and

(e) The Assistant Directors of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in the order listed:

(1) Assistant Director, Counterterrorism Division;

(2) Assistant Director, Criminal Investigative Division;

(3) Assistant Director, Counterintelligence Division;

(4) Assistant Director, Washington Field Office;

(5) Assistant Director, New York Field Office; and

(6) Assistant Director, Los Angeles Field Office.

**Sec. 2.***Exceptions*.                     

(a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as the Director pursuant to this memorandum.

(b) No individual shall act as Director unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998.

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this memorandum, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this memorandum in designating an acting Director.

**Sec. 3.***Judicial Review*. This memorandum is intended to improve the internal management of the executive branch and is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.                              ( print page 7344)    

**Sec. 4.**                         The Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

[FR Doc. 07-714

Billing code 44-1002-M
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Risk Management &
Investigative Solutions (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter Maheu, Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/Peter
      MaheuPeter
      MaheuPrincipal
      Financial OfficerNovember
      13, 2008