alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and entered into as of this 15th day of September 2014, by and between UNILIFE CORPORATION (“Unilife”) and Alan D. Shortall. (“Shortall”). 

WHEREAS, Unilife and Shortall have entered into an employment agreement, dated as of September 30, 2011 (the
“Agreement”) in connection with Shortall’s employment by Unilife; and 
 WHEREAS, Unilife and Shortall desire
to amend the term of the Agreement. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and covenants set forth herein, and intending
to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The first sentence of Section 1 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following. Other than this first sentence of Section 1, Section 1 shall remain unchanged:


 “This Agreement shall be effective as of October 1, 2011 and shall expire on December 31,
2019.” 
  

	 	2.	Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. 

  

	 	3.	All other provisions of the Agreement not amended by this Amendment shall continue in full force and effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on the date first set forth above. 

 

							
	UNILIFE CORPORATION:	 		 	Alan D. Shortall:
				
	By:	 	 /s/ John Ryan
	 		 	 /s/ Alan D. Shortall

		 	John Ryan	 		 	
		 	SVP, General Counsel & Secretary
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LEWIS JERNIGAN,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No: 5:11-cv-113-RH-GRJ

C ATKINS, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This case is before the Court on Doc. 50, Defendant C. Atkins’ motion for

summary judgment. On June 12, 2012, the Court issued a Summary Judgment Notice

to Plaintiff advising him of the consequences of failing to respond to the summary

judgment motion. Specifically, the Court advised Plaintiff that: (1) failing to respond to

the summary judgment motion will indicate that the motion is not opposed; (2) all

material facts asserted in the motion will be considered admitted unless controverted by

proper evidentiary materials (counter-affidavits, depositions, exhibits, etc.); and (3)

Plaintiff may not rely solely on the allegations of the issue pleadings (e.g., complaint,

answer, etc.) in opposing the summary judgment motion. See Griffith v. Wainwright,

772 F.2d 822,825 (11th Cir. 1985). Plaintiff was ordered to respond to the summary

judgment motion on or before July 12, 2012. Doc. 51.

Plaintiff failed to oppose the summary judgment motion, and the Court therefore

ordered him to show cause on or before December 11, 2012, as to why the motion

should not be granted. Plaintiff was advised that failure to respond to the Court’s order
would result in a recommendation that the case be dismissed. As of the date of this

Report, Plaintiff has failed to respond to the show cause order. Doc. 59.

In view of Plaintiff’s inaction in the face of the Court’s orders, the Court

concludes that Defendant C. Atkins’ summary judgment motion is unopposed and

should be granted. The U.S. Marshal has been unable to effect service of process

upon the only remaining Defendant, L. Olson. In view of Plaintiff’s failure to respond to

the Court’s orders, the case should also be dismissed as to L. Olson for failure to

prosecute. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the motion for summary

judgment, Doc. 50, be GRANTED, that judgment be entered in Defendant C. Atkins’

favor and the claims against C. Atkins dismissed, and that Plaintiff’s claims against L.

Olson be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

IN CHAMBERS this 14 day of December 2012. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Poker Magic, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas Polinsky,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph A. Geraci, II, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





May
      15, 2009
                    /s/ Douglas PolinskyDouglas
      PolinskyChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      15, 2009
                    /s/ Joseph A. Geraci, IIJoseph
      A. Geraci, IIChief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 28 (Monday, February 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 6536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-611]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a 
closed session meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held at 9 a.m., Tuesday, February 27, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at ITS Noesis Business Unit, 4100 
N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Vicki Schneider, ITS Noesis 
Business Unit, 4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203, 
703-741-0300.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The mission of the Advisory Group is to 
provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, 
Technology and Logistics to the Director of Defense Research and 
Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense 
Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in 
planning and managing an effective and economical research and 
development program in the area of electron devices.
    The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and 
development efforts in electronics and photonics with a focus on 
benefits to national defense. These reviews may form the basis for 
research and development programs initiated by the Military Departments 
and Defense Agencies to be conducted by industry, universities or in 
government laboratories. The agenda for this meeting will include 
programs on molecular electronics, microelectronics, electro-optics, 
and electronic materials. In accordance with Section 10(d) of Public 
Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2), it has been determined that 
this Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(1), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the 
public.

    Dated: February 6, 2007.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-611 Filed 2-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 563 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain individuals 

from the individual health insurance mandate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2017 

Mr. MESSER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

certain individuals from the individual health insurance 

mandate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Unaffordable Care 

5 Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 563 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FROM THE INDIVIDUAL HEALTH IN2 SURANCE MANDATE FOR CERTAIN INDIVID3 UALS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5000A(e) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new paragraphs: 

7 ‘‘(6) INDIVIDUALS RESIDING IN LOCATIONS

8 WITH LESS THAN TWO EXCHANGE PLANS.—Any ap9 plicable individual who for any month resides in a lo10 cation with respect to which there are less than two 

11 qualified health plans offered to such individual 

12 through an Exchange established under title I of the 

13 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 

14 ‘‘(7) INDIVIDUALS SUBJECT TO CERTAIN PRE15 MIUM INCREASES.—Any applicable individual for 

16 any month beginning in a calendar year (hereafter 

17 in this paragraph referred to as the ‘exemption 

18 month’) if— 

19 ‘‘(A) such individual was covered under 

20 minimum essential coverage for the last month 

21 of the preceding calendar year, and 

22 ‘‘(B) the premium for such minimum es23 sential coverage for the exemption month is at 

24 least 125 percent of the premium for such cov25 erage for the month described in subparagraph 

26 (A).’’. 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 563 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to months beginning after the date 

3 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ALBERT JEFFERSON,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:11cv48-WS

JAY FLOYD, DANICA POLLOCK,

and AMBER VARGAS,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

February 9, 2011. See Doc. 5. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's

complaint and this case be dismissed as an abuse of the judicial process. The plaintiff

has filed no objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. 

This court having considered the record, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 5) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is

DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) because he has had more than three "strikes"

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). 

3. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED as an abuse of the
Page 2 of 2

judicial process.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall note on the docket that

this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and as barred by §

1915(g).

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of March , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 4:11cv48-WS
Exhibit 31.2  Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer   I, Reid Stone, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: February 16, 2010   /s/ Reid Stone Reid Stone Title: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2011043EN.01000201.xml

| 11.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6079 — BBVA/Dogus Holdings/Turkiye Garanti Bankasi JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 43/03

On 3 February 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6079. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6079. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
2014.7.31 Exhibit 10.1






Exhibit 10.1


Resolution of Board of Directors, June 6, 2014, establishing compensation for non-management directors 
    
*************    


NOW, THEREFORE, LET IT BE RESOLVED, That the Board member compensation structure set forth in Exhibit A is hereby approved, effective November 1, 2014; and   


EXHIBIT A




	
		
	Piedmont Director Compensation Structure

	Pay Component
	Amount

	Annual Board Retainer
	$60,000*

	Board Meeting Fee
	$1,000* per meeting

	Committee Meeting Fee
	$1,000* per meeting

	Annual Independent Lead Director Retainer
	$17,500*

	Annual Committee Chair Retainers
	Audit:                               $15,000*
Compensation:                 $9,375*
Directors & Corporate                                                                     Governance:                     $9,375*
Benefits:                           $5,000*
Finance:                            $5,000*

	Annual Equity Grant
	$90,000

	Initial Election Equity Grant 
	Eliminated






*Inclusive of the 25% stock match assuming the Director takes all of his or her retainers and attendance fees in the Company’s Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday April 4, 2008. 

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. 

# Status:

Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters. 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084. 

David A. Stawick,

 Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 08-1050 Filed 3-14-08; 11:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-27]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-27 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: December 27, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 853)          ( print page 854)          ( print page 855)          ( print page 856)          ( print page 857)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-6285 Filed 1-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
No. 1357, Misc.

#### Cipolla *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


      In connection with the Annual Report of CanWest Petroleum Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A No. 1 for the annual period ended April 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 11, 2005             By /s/ Thornton J. Donaldson
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Thornton J. Donaldson,
                                      President, Chief Financial Officer and
                                      Director
# CA2011068EN.01000201.xml

| 3.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 68/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 68/2

---

Corrigendum to the notice of open competition EPSO/AST/111/10 — Secretaries (AST 1) — DA/DE/EN/ES/FR/MT/NL/PT/SV

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 312 A of 17 November 2010
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 312 A of 17 November 2010

(2011/C 68 A/02)

On page 3, in Section IV.2:

for:

| ‘Test (d) | Professional capability:


  accuracy and precision | Marking: 0-20


  Pass mark: 10 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Test (e) | Professional capability:


  prioritising and organising | Marking: 0-20


  Pass mark: 10’ |

‘Test (d)

Professional capability:

accuracy and precision

Marking: 0-20

Pass mark: 10

Test (e)

Professional capability:

prioritising and organising

Marking: 0-20

Pass mark: 10’

read:

| ‘Test (d) | Professional capability:


  accuracy and precision | Marking: 0-20 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Test (e) | Professional capability:


  prioritising and organising | Marking: 0-20 |
| | The aggregate pass mark for tests (d) and (e) is 20’ |

‘Test (d)

Professional capability:

accuracy and precision

Marking: 0-20

Test (e)

Professional capability:

prioritising and organising

Marking: 0-20

The aggregate pass mark for tests (d) and (e) is 20’

---