alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 2 (Thursday, January 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 471-475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 08-21]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 08-21 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: December 26, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 472]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03JA08.021


[[Page 473]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03JA08.022


[[Page 474]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03JA08.023


[[Page 475]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN03JA08.024

[FR Doc. 07-6263 Filed 1-2-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 90 (Thursday, May 8, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26084-26085]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1237]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Wednesday, May 21, 2008.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Rule Enforcement Review.

[[Page 26085]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 08-1237 Filed 5-6-08; 12:38 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5413 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to permit Members of Congress 

to use facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs for the purposes 

of meeting with constituents, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2018 

Mr. MAST (for himself and Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to permit Members of Congress to use facilities of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs for the purposes of meeting with 

constituents, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Veterans 

5 Access to Congressional Services Act of 2018’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5413 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF FACILITIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VET2 ERANS AFFAIRS BY MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Upon request of a Member of 

4 Congress and subject to regulations prescribed under sub5 section (b), the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall permit 

6 the Member to use a facility of the Department of Vet7 erans Affairs for the purposes of meeting with constitu8 ents of the Member. 

9 (b) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 90 days after the 

10 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans 

11 Affairs shall prescribe regulations regarding the use of fa12 cilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs by Members 

13 of Congress. Regulations prescribed under this sub14 section— 

15 (1) shall require that a space within a facility 

16 of the Department provided to a Member under sub17 section (a) is— 

18 (A) available during normal business 

19 hours; and 

20 (B) located in an area that is visible and 

21 accessible to constituents of the Member; and 

22 (2) may not prohibit a Member from adver23 tising the use by the Member of a space within a fa24 cility of the Department under subsection (a). 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Alex
Brecher, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of VOIP Talk, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report of VOIP Talk, Inc. on Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operation of VOIP Talk, Inc.
  Date: May
      15, 2008
                By:
                /s/ Alex
      BrecherAlex
      Brecher
                  Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
                    and
      Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
      Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9304]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-980]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Notice of Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

DATE AND TIME: Friday, March 9, 2007, 9 a.m.

PLACE: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, 
Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Approval of Minutes of March 1, Meeting.
III. Announcements.
IV. Staff Director's Report.
V. Management and Operations.
    <bullet> Procedures for Briefing Reports.
    <bullet> Strategic Planning.
VI. Program Planning.
    <bullet> Affirmative Action in Law Schools Briefing Report.
VII. State Advisory Committee Issues.
    <bullet> Fair Housing Initiative.
    <bullet> Tennessee SAC.
VIII. Future Agenda Items.
IX. Adjourn.

Briefing Agenda

Domestic Wiretapping in the War on Terror.
    <bullet> Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
    <bullet> Speakers' Presentation.
    <bullet> Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Manuel Alba, Press and Communications, 
(202) 376-8582.

David P. Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-980 Filed 2-27-07; 2:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                           GOLF TRUST OF AMERICA, INC.
                    CALCULATION OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED
                      CHARGES AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS
                                DECEMBER 31, 1999
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                 Period from
                                                                                                 February 12
                                                      Year ended             Year ended             though
                                                     December 31,           December 31,         December 31,
                                                     ------------           ------------         ------------

                                                         1999                  1998                 1997
                                                         ----                  ----                 ----
<S>                                                     <C>                   <C>                  <C>
Pre-tax Income before Minority Interest                 18,257                17,736               11,767
Fixed charges
     Interest expense                                   15,603                 9,673                1,879
     Loan Cost Amortization                                958                   588                  280
                                                       -------               -------              -------
Total fixed charges before preferred stock
dividends                                               16,561                10,261                2,159

     Preferred stock dividends                           1,382

Total fixed charges                                     17,943                10,261                2,159

Earnings available for fixed charges:
     Earnings                                           18,257                17,736               11,767
     Add: Fixed charges before preferred stock
       dividends                                        16,561                10,261                2,159
                                                       -------               -------              -------

     Total earnings available for
       fixed charges                                    34,818                27,997               13,926
                                                       =======               =======              =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (1)                    1.94                  2.73                 6.45
</TABLE>

(1)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed based on the
     Company's continuing operations by dividing total earnings available for
     fixed charges, excluding preferred stock dividends, by total fixed charges.
     Fixed charges consist of interest expense and preferred stock dividends.

                                      F-1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

VICTOR M. GONZALEZ VAZQUEZ, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-30164 

D.C. No. 2:10-cr-00324-RAJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Richard A. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 19, 2019**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges. 

Victor M. Gonzalez Vazquez appeals from the district court’s order granting 

in part, and denying in part, his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence 

reduction. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gonzalez 

Vazquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 21 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-30164 

along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided 

Gonzalez Vazquez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se 

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 14

- 00 186

- CV

Style: Lloyd Gilliam, Carolyn Gilliam, Martha Hollan, Charlie Beaird, Karen

Beaird , Lila Rose Anderson, Michael Sanders, Raquel Sanders,

Richard Lon, Priscilla Lon, Donna H. Johnson, Jerome M. Bradke,

Nancy Bradke, Mr. and Mrs. E.E. Ewing, Jr., Ricky Leggett, Kenny

Bear, Dana Bear, Regina Brueggeman, Steven Brueggeman, Marlo

Porras, Dav id Connell, Jr., Jason Bronas, and Barbara McGuire

v Santa Fe Independent School District

Date motion filed * : April 21, 2015

Type of motion: M otion to substitute counsel

Part y filing motion: Appellants

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

Ordered that motion is :

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________

The Clerk of this Court is ordered to substitute Rachaelle Reynolds for Anthony

P. Griffin as the appellants’ counsel of record. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 6.5( d ).

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: April 28, 2015
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT LEE HINSON, JR., 

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv480/RV/MD

EDWIN G. BUSS,

Respondent.

ORDER

Before the court is petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (doc. 29). 

Petitioner argues summary judgment is appropriate because respondent failed to

comply with this court’s order granting respondent an extension of time to file its

response until May 25, 2011 (doc. 18). Petitioner filed this motion by mailbox rule on

June 6, 2011. The court issued an order on June 7, 2011, directing respondent to file

an answer to the petition by June 27, 2011 (doc. 26). In light of this order,

petitioner’s motion for summary judgment is premature. 

Petitioner is also advised that to receive the relief he requests—namely

immediate discharge from custody based on respondent’s failure to comply with an

order of the court (doc. 29, p.3)—the proper motion is one for default judgment. Fed.

R. Civ. P. 55(a). However, the Eleventh Circuit has held that granting default

judgment based upon a respondent’s tardiness or failure to answer a petition is not

appropriate in habeas corpus cases. Aziz v. Leferve, 830 F.2d 184, 187 (11th Cir.

1987) (“The district court should have proceeded as if it had received a return from

the state authorities.”); Goodman v. Keohane, 663 F.2d 1044, 1048 n.4 (11th Cir. 1981)

Case 3:10-cv-00480-RV-MD Document 31 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

(adhering to prior Fifth Circuit decisions1 rejecting default judgment based on the

government’s tardiness in responding to the petition); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2243

(“The court shall summarily hear and determine the facts, and dispose of the matter

as law and justice require.”). Instead, the court should treat the respondent’s

procedural default defenses as waived and proceed to address the petition on the

merits. Shukwit v. United States, 973 F.2d 903, 904 (11th Cir. 1992) (§ 2255 context). 

But see 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(3) (state must expressly waive nonexhaustion defense).

Accordingly it is ORDERED:

1. Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment (doc. 29) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of June, 2011.

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

 Former Fifth Circuit decisions issued before October 1, 1981, are binding precedent on the Eleventh

Circuit. Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981).

Case No. 3:10cv480/RV/MD

Case 3:10-cv-00480-RV-MD Document 31 Filed 06/15/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of HPC POS System, Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Melvin Coles, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Dated:  August 22, 2011  /s/ Melvin W. Coles Melvin W. Coles Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior National Park Service
 AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Public notice.
 SUMMARY: Purusant to 36 CFR 51.23, public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service propses to extend the following expiring concession contracts for a period of up to 1 year, or until such time as a new contract is executed, whichever occurs sooner.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All of the listed concession authorizations will expire by their terms on or before December 31, 2006. The National Park Service has determined that the proposed short-term extensions are necessary in order to avoid interruption of visitor services and has taken all reasonable and appropriate steps to consider alternatives to avoid such interruption. These extensions will allow the National Park Service to complete and issue prospectuses leading to the competitive selection of concessioners for new long-term concession contracts covering these operations. Conc ID No.
Concessioner name
ParkGRBA001-98
Raven's Roost
Great Basin National Park.LARO001-92
Dakota Columbia Rentals
Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area.YOSE003-88
Vaughn, Vaughn & Carter (El Portal Market)
Yosemite National Park.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         January 1, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo A. Pendry, Concession Program Manager, National Park Service, Washington, DC 20240, Telephone 202/513-7156. Dated: December 16, 2006. John Wessels, Acting Assistant Director, Business Services.


[FR Doc. 07-667  Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-53-M
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 10

- 00 822

- CR
IN RE Kevin P. BONNER Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 15, 2010
PETI TION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On November 12, 2010, relator Kevin Bonner filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on his pro se motion to withdraw from plea
bar gain agreement and motion to enter judgment and sentence nunc pro tunc. However, counsel has been appointed to represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitle d to hybrid representation.
See Robinson v. State , 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with regard to a cri minal proceeding in which the defendant is

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 20 09

- CR

- 12380 , styled State of Te xas v. Kevin P. Bonner , pending in the 227 th Jud icial District Court , Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip Kazen presiding.04

- 10

- 00 822

- CR

- 2

- represented by counsel. See Robinson , 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule on relator’s pro se motions filed in the criminal proceeding pending in th e trial court. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8( a).
PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 23, 2009 

1116 

Order 

 

November 23, 2009 

139530 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139530 

 COA: 292210 

Muskegon CC: 08-056127-FH 

DARIUS JAJUAN CHILDREY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 1, 2009 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### HASSELL v. MEANS

No. 41 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 524.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1979.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DEXTER W WHITE, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00173-MP-CAS

KENNETH S. TUCKER, Secretary,

Florida Department of Corrections

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated October 18, 2012. (Doc. 40). The parties have been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(doc. 26) is DENIED.
Page 2 of 2

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules

Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of December, 2012

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 4:11-cv-00173-MP-CAS
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of MoneyLogix Group, Inc. for the Year Ending December 31, 2010, I, Binnay Sethi,Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director of MoneyLogix Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.   Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MoneyLogix Group, Inc.





Dated: April 15, 2011





MONEYLOGIX GROUP, INC.By:
/s/ Binnay SethiBinnay SethiVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Director