alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

 2 p.m., Wednesday, May 21, 2008. 

# Place:

 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. 

# Status:

 Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

Enforcement Matters. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084. 

David A. Stawick,

 Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 08-1159 Filed 4-16-08; 4:02 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
<page>				       			    	                     EXHIBIT 31.01
CERTIFICATIONS
I,  Walter Davis, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan
Stanley Managed Futures LV, L.P.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

    b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant?s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant?s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant?s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant?s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant?s internal
control over financial reporting; and
<page>
5.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant?s auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant?s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant?s ability to record, process, summarize, and
report financial information; and

   b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant?s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   November 20, 2008  By: /s/	Walter Davis
		Walter Davis
                                  	President,
	 	Demeter Management Corporation,
                                 	general partner of the registrant
EXHIBIT  32.02

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Colony  Energy, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"), the
undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  his  knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  June  ____,  2008
 /s/  Kent  E.  Lovelace,  Jr.
 -----------------------------
 Kent  E.  Lovelace,  Jr.,
 Chief  Financial  Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

      ( print page 34061)    
It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Harbour Intermodal, Ltd. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2002.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on June 12, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on June 25, 2008.

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson, 

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 08-1361 Filed 6-12-08; 12:18pm]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 35 (Thursday, February 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7964]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-809]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

Agency: United States Election Assistance Commission.
* * * * *

Action: Notice of Public Meeting.

Date & Time: Wednesday, February 21, 2007, 8 a.m.-8:30 a.m.

Place: Ritz-Carlton Atlanta, 191 Peachtree Street, NE., Ballroom Pre-
Function III/IV, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 659-0400.

Agenda: The Commission will consider accrediting iBeta Quality 
Assurance and SysTest Labs LLC. to receive federal approval to test 
voting systems against federal voting system standards and guidelines 
based upon the recommendations of the National Institute of Standards 
and Technology (NIST) as required by the Help America Vote Act (HAVA).
    This meeting will be open to the public.

Statement of Exception Circumstances: This notice of a meeting will not 
be published in the Federal Register 7 days prior to the meeting date. 
Late notice was unavoidable due to the combination of two factors: (1) 
The time required for EAC to properly evaluate the January 18, 2007 
recommendations EAC received from NIST to federally accredit two voting 
system test laboratories and (2) to serve the public interest by having 
the two federally accredited labs in place immediately in order to 
begin testing voting systems against federal voting system standards 
and guidelines. With the 2008 elections schedule fast approaching, it 
is most critical that the federal voting system testing process begin 
at the earliest possible date.

Person to Contact for Information: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.
* * * * *

Gracia M. Hillman,
Commissioner, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-809 Filed 2-16-07; 4:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 41 (Friday, March 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-992]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Cancellation of Agency Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the previously 
announced closed meeting of the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation scheduled to be held at 10 a.m. on 
Thursday, March 1, 2007, has been cancelled.
    No earlier notice of this cancellation was practicable.

    Dated: February 28, 2007.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-992 Filed 2-28-07; 12:35 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-3470

___________ Delta Remanufacturing of Mariana, * LLC, * * Plaintiff, * * Carlos Crisp, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern Bobby Mott, * District of Arkansas. * Plaintiff, * [UNPUBLISHED] * v. * * Jim O’Connor; Gary Lynch, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: May 3, 2001 Filed: May 15, 2001

___________ Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2- Carlos Crisp appeals from the district court’s 1 order awarding attorneys’ fees to defendants under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-308 in this diversity-jurisdiction action for breach of contract. Upon de novo review of the application of state law, see Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. Edwards , 243 F.3d 457, 461 (8th Cir. 2001) (per curiam) , we agree with the district court that defendants were prevailing parties when Crisp voluntarily dismissed his complaint with prejudice. Furthermore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in the extent of the award or in denying Crisp’s motion for reconsideration. See Jarrett v. ERC Properties, Inc. , 211 F.3d 1078, 1084-85 (8th Cir. 2000) (attorneys’ fees); Sanders v. Clemco Indus. , 862 F.2d 161, 169-70 (8th Cir. 1988) (motion for reconsideration). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### GARDNER v. BRADY

No. 52 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 647.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 April 1972.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 08-29]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-29 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

      ( print page 73000)    
Dated: December 18, 2007

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 73001)          ( print page 73002)          ( print page 73003)          ( print page 73004)    

BILLING CODE 5001-01-M

[FR Doc. 07-6150 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mireya Patino Garcia v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00939-CR

Trial court case number: 1952529

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 9, Harris County, Texas

A jury convicted appellant of the misdemeanor offense of theft and appellant timely 

appealed. The clerk’s record has been filed. The reporter’s record was originally due on

December 19, 2014. We were advised by the court reporter on February 4, 2015, that appellant 

had not made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record. Appellant was notified on April 14, 

2015 of nonpayment for the reporter’s record, and that, unless appellant responded by May 15, 

2015, we would consider the appeal on the briefs without the benefit of a reporter’s record. No 

response was filed and on May 21, 2015, we issued an order, directing appellant to file his brief 

on or before June 22, 2015. No brief was filed.

Notice of late brief issued on July 3, 2015. On July 27, 2015, appellant’s new, retained 

counsel filed a motion to substitute and a motion for extension of time to file the record. We 

granted the motion to substitute and granted an extension until September 23, 2015, to file the 

reporter’s record. No record was filed. On October 8, 2015, the court reporter again advised this 

court that she had not received payment for the record. 

The clerk’s record reflects that the trial court determined that appellant is not indigent. In 

addition, the record reflects that appellant retained counsel to represent him in the trial court and 

that he posted an appeal bond. We may consider an appeal without a reporter’s record if a 

reporter’s record is not filed because an appellant, who is not indigent, fails to request and pay 

the fee for preparation of a reporter’s record. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

Accordingly, this appeal will be considered without a reporter’s record unless the 

reporter’s record is filed within 14 days of the date of this order, or unless by that date appellant 

provides this Court with proof that he has paid, or made arrangements to pay, the court reporter

for preparation of the record. No further extensions of time to file the reporter’s record will be 

granted. 

It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: October 22, 2015
NIOSH Respiratory Protective Device Information

 NIOSH CA 2023-1070

 November 2023

 

Effective Immediately: Voluntary Rescission of 26 Honeywell International 

Inc. Approvals
Document Number

NIOSH CA 2023 – 1070

Page 2 of 2

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has honored a request by Honeywell 

International Inc. to voluntarily rescind 26 NIOSH respirator approvals issued to Honeywell 

International Inc.

As of November 13, 2023, any respirator marked with a NIOSH approval label with the below 

approval numbers are no longer NIOSH approved. The NIOSH Certified Equipment List no longer 

includes these approval numbers:

84A-0593 84A-0594 84A-0595 84A-0596 84A-0597

84A-0598 84A-0599 84A-0600 84A-0601 84A-0602

84A-0603 84A-0604 84A-0605 84A-0606 84A-0607

84A-0608 84A-0609 84A-0610 84A-0612 84A-0613

84A-0614 84A-0615 84A-0616 84A-0901 84A-0902

84A-0903

Due to the voluntary rescission of these NIOSH approvals, respirators bearing these NIOSH approval 

numbers may no longer be used, manufactured, assembled, sold, or distributed.

Please reach out to Honeywell International Inc. for additional details related to their decision to 

voluntarily rescind 26 approvals issued to Honeywell International Inc. identified in this notice. The 

Certified Equipment List can be used to locate other NIOSH Approved® respirators.

NIOSH Approved® is a certification mark of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) registered in the 

United States and several international jurisdictions

Effective Immediately: Voluntary Rescission of 26 Honeywell International Inc. 

Approvals
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30937

IN RE: AARON GENTRAS,

Movant

Motion for an order authorizing

the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Louisiana to consider

a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Gentras, Louisiana prisoner #129938, has requested authorization

to file a second 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application in federal district court. Gentras was

convicted of cocaine possession and was sentenced to 50 years of imprisonment

at hard labor without the benefit of probation or suspension of sentence. He

seeks to argue that his constitutional rights were violated when the Louisiana

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal used flawed procedures to review his state petitions

for postconviction review. He also wishes to challenge the ruling by the

Louisiana Supreme Court, made after his first § 2254 application was decided,

transferring his case to the state Fifth Circuit for review by a panel of that court. 

Finally, he suggests that he wants to reurge the claims he raised in his first

§ 2254 application. He seeks to raise these claims now based on new facts

regarding purportedly improper procedures the state Fifth Circuit used to decide

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 4, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 11-30937 Document: 00511714523 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/04/2012
No. 11-30937

pro se postconviction petitions and the remedial procedures the Louisiana

Supreme Court adopted in response.

Infirmities in state postconviction proceedings are not grounds for relief

under § 2254. See Moore v. Dretke, 369 F.3d 844, 846 (5th Cir. 2004). Thus,

none of Gentras’s proposed challenges to the Louisiana courts’ procedures for

addressing postconviction petitions states a claim that is cognizable on federal

habeas review. Additionally, to the extent that Gentras wishes to raise the same

claims that he brought in his previous § 2254 application, he may not do so. See

§ 2244(b)(1). 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Gentras’s motion for authorization to

file a successive § 2254 application is DENIED.

2

Case: 11-30937 Document: 00511714523 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/04/2012
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5424 

To authorize the Society of the First Infantry Division to make modifications 

to the First Division Monument located on Federal land in Presidential 

Park, District of Columbia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2018 

Mr. MARSHALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Society of the First Infantry Division to 

make modifications to the First Division Monument located on Federal land in Presidential Park, District of 

Columbia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘First Division Monu5 ment Modification Act’’. 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5424 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OR AUGMENTATION TO FIRST DIVI2 SION MONUMENT. 

3 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The Society of the First In4 fantry Division (an organization described in section 

5 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and ex6 empt from taxation under section 501(a) of that code), 

7 may make modifications (including construction of addi8 tional plaques and stone plinths on which to put the 

9 plaques) to the First Division Monument located on Fed10 eral land in Presidential Park, District of Columbia that 

11 was set aside for memorial purposes of the First Infantry 

12 Division. The additions will honor the members of the 

13 First Infantry Division who paid the ultimate sacrifice 

14 during United States operations including, but not limited 

15 to, Operation Desert Storm, Operation Iraqi Freedom and 

16 New Dawn, and Operation Enduring Freedom. It is esti17 mated that not more than 5,000 names shall be added 

18 to the memorial. The First Infantry Division at the De19 partment of the Army shall collaborate with the Depart20 ment of Defense to provide the list of names to be added. 

21 (b) APPLICATION OF COMMEMORATIVE WORKS

22 ACT.—Subsections (b) and (c) of section 8903 of title 40, 

23 United States Code (commonly known as the ‘‘Commemo24 rative Works Act’’), shall not apply to actions taken under 

25 subsection (a) of this section. 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5424 IH

1 (c) FUNDING.—Federal funds may not be used to pay 

2 any expense of the activities authorized by this section. 

Æ 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Thomas
      H. Hanna, Jr., Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
      of
      Eastern Resources, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
      Company for the
      fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company .





Date:
                September 26, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Thomas H. Hanna, Jr.Thomas
                H. Hanna, Jr.Principal
                Executive Officer andPrincipal
                Financial Officer