alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 10 (Tuesday, January 15, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 2546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-120]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: 9:30 a.m. Wednesday, January 23, 2008.

PLACE: NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 
20594.

STATUS: The one item is open to the public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: 
7968--Railroad Accident Briefs and Safety Recommendation Letter--(1) 
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Train Strikes Wayside 
Worker Near the Dupont Circle Station, Washington, DC., May 14, 2006 
(DCA-06-FR-005), and (2) WMATA Train Strikes Wayside Workers Near the 
Eisenhower Avenue Station, Alexandria, Virginia, November 30, 2006.

NEWS MEDIA CONTACT: Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris 
Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, January 18, 2008.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
http://www.ntsb.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: January 11, 2008.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 08-120 Filed 1-11-08; 1:35 pm]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11 - 7014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. WILLIAM PENN REAVIS, SR., a/k/a William Penn Reavis , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News . Jerome B. Friedman, Senior District Judge. ( 4:07

- cr - 00075

- JBF
- DEM
- 1; 4:09

- cv - 00157

- JBF )

Submitted : March 29, 2012 Decided: April 2, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. William Penn Reavis, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Richard Murphy, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2

PER CURIAM:

William Penn Reavis, Sr., seeks to appeal the district
court ’ s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge . We d ismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court ’ s f inal judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case i s a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court ’ s order was entered on the docket

on April 20, 2011 . The notice of appeal was filed on June 22 , 2011
. * Because Reavis failed to file a timely notice of appe al or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

* For the purposes of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4 (c); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988).3

materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisio nal process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



I, Brian Wasserman, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of SG Blocks, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2014; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|March 31, 2015 | /s/ Brian Wasserman            
|-------------- | -------------------------------
|               | Name: Brian Wasserman          
|               | Title:  Chief Financial Officer
GK INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual Report of GK Intelligent  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary F.
Kimmons,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Chief  Financial  Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: May 5, 2003                      /S/ Gary F. Kimmons
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        By: Gary F. Kimmons
                                        Its: President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7967

TOBIN J. JONES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE JOHNSON, Director, Department of

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-03-466-3)

Submitted: July 29, 2005 Decided: October 5, 2005

Before KING and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Barbara Lynn Hartung, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Virginia

Bidwell Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tobin J. Jones appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

Jones alleged the following claims:

(1) The magistrate judge applied the wrong standard of

review when he held a hearing on Jones’s claim that

he received ineffective assistance of counsel when

counsel did not pursue a “not guilty by reason of

insanity” defense;

(2) Defense counsel was ineffective when he withdrew

notice of a “not guilty by reason of insanity”

defense and proceeded to a jury trial;

(3) Defense counsel was ineffective in preparing for or

countering trial testimony from a jail house

informant that Jones confessed;

(4) The prosecution violated Brady v. Maryland, 373

U.S. 83 (1963), when it failed to disclose Jones’s

confession to the expert who evaluated Jones’s

sanity.

By order, we granted a certificate of appealability as to Claims

(1), (2), and (4). The Respondent has filed an informal

preliminary brief as to those claims, and Jones has filed a reply

brief. 

After reviewing the parties’ filings and the record on

appeal, we conclude Claim (1) is meritless, and we affirm the

magistrate judge’s actions as to that claim. As for Claims (2) and

(4), we affirm the magistrate judge’s disposition of those claims

based upon the reasoning of the magistrate judge. We deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss as to Claim (3) based upon

the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Jones v. Johnson, No.
- 3 -

CA-03-466-3 (E.D. Va. Nov. 8, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal issues are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

 AFFIRMED IN PART;

 DISMISSED IN PART
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Of**

**Principal Executive Officer**

**Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trevena, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Maxine Gowen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

1)                                     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)                                     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 
| Date:   May 9, 2014 | /s/   MAXINE GOWEN                      |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| * *                 | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
| * *                 | *(Principal Executive Officer)*         |

 

This certification accompanies the Report and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----
Exhibit 8

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

Below is a list of our subsidiaries and their jurisdiction of incorporation as
of December 31, 2007.



|                                                          |  |  |  |                         
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|Subsidiary                                                |  |  |  | Country of Incorporation
|Closed Joint Stock Company Sakhalin Telecom Mobile      |  |  |  | Russia                  
|Closed Joint Stock Company Karachaevo-Cherkessk Telesot |  |  |  | Russia                  
|Closed Joint Stock Company Kabardino-Balkarskiy GSM     |  |  |  | Russia                  
|Closed Joint Stock Company Impuls KB                    |  |  |  | Russia                  
|Closed Joint Stock Company MSS-Start                    |  |  |  | Russia                  
|Closed Joint Stock Company RTI Service-Svyaz            |  |  |  | Russia                  
|Limited Liability Company Dominanta                     |  |  |  | Russia                  
|Closed Joint Stock Company Corporation Severnaya Korona |  |  |  | Russia                  
|Limited Liability Company KaR-Tel                       |  |  |  | Kazakhstan              
|Limited Liability Company Tacom                         |  |  |  | Tajikistan              
|Closed Joint Stock Company Ukrainian Radio Systems      |  |  |  | Ukraine                 
|Limited Liability Company Unitel                        |  |  |  | Uzbekistan              
|Limited Liability Company Mobitel                       |  |  |  | Georgia                 
|Closed Joint Stock Company Armenia Telephone Company    |  |  |  | Armenia                 
|VimpelCom Finance B.V.                                    |  |  |  | Netherlands             
|VC ESOP N.V.                                              |  |  |  | Netherlands             
|Silkway Holding B.V.                                      |  |  |  | Netherlands             
|Limnotex Developments Limited                             |  |  |  | Cyprus                  
|Crisden Holdings Limited                                  |  |  |  | Cyprus                  
|Cellcroft Holdings Limited                                |  |  |  | Cyprus                  
|Cradel Investments Limited                                |  |  |  | Cyprus                  
|Wintop Management Limited                                 |  |  |  | Cyprus                  
|Crayola Properties Limited                                |  |  |  | Cyprus                  
|VimpelCom (BVI) Ltd.                                      |  |  |  | British Virgin Islands  
|Watertrail Industries Ltd. (BVI)                          |  |  |  | British Virgin Islands  
|Freevale Enterprises, Inc. (BVI)                          |  |  |  | British Virgin Islands
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FREDDIE BENNETT, 

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:11cv274-MP/WCS 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This case is before the court upon Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss

Complaint filed September 27, 2011. Doc. 16. While Defendant does not oppose, there

is no written stipulation for dismissal. A court order is needed. Rule 41. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the motion, doc. 16, be

GRANTED and this case closed.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on September 28, 2011. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case 4:11-cv-00274-MP-WCS Document 17 Filed 09/28/11 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains restated summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operation for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 1997 and the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September
30, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             108,994
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                            39
<INVENTORY>                                            155
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   113,966
<PP&E>                                              28,359
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,532
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     174,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                6,180
<BONDS>                                                512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                7,000
<PREFERRED>                                              1<F1>
<COMMON>                                                 7
<OTHER-SE>                                         154,594
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       174,049
<SALES>                                              4,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    27,736
<CGS>                                                  968
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       17,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6,730
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4,454
<INCOME-TAX>                                           699
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3,755
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         3,755
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.07

<FN>
<F1> Represents par value of Reading Entertainment Series B Preferred Stock
</FN>

</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.01





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE


SARBANES
      OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Westside Energy Corporation (the "Company")
      on Form 10 KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
      undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





April
      17,
      2007      By: /s/
      Douglas G. Manner


Douglas
      G. Manner


Chief
      Executive Officer








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE


SARBANES
      OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Westside Energy Corporation (the "Company")
      on Form 10 KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
      undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





April
      17,
      2007        By: /s/
      Sean J. Austin


Sean
      J.
      Austin,


Chief
      Financial Officer
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 2 Filed 01/03/01 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 2 Filed 01/03/01 Page 2 of 2
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 2202 Lower Tribunal No. GC2021

- 126

_____________________________
S HARON B OVEE and M ICHAEL B OVEE , Appellant s ,

v.

C APTAIN D’ S , LLC
, M OSAIC RBFL, LLC
, G AND G R EALTY , GP, and M ICHAEL E. H AUPT as Trustee of the H AUPT F AMILY T RUST , Appellee s

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands County

. Peter F. Estrada
, Judge.

May 7, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

STARGEL
, WHITE and MIZE , JJ., c oncur.

Thomas A. Burns and Shannon C. Reese , of Burns, P.A.
, Tampa , for Appellants

. Carol M. Rooney , of Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP
, Tampa , for Appellees, M os aic RBFL, LLC, and G and G Realty GP

. No Appearance for Appellee s , Captain D’s LLC , and Michael E. Haupt as Trustee of the Haupt Family Trust

.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 8 2002

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

VAN STAFFORD; LOIS STAFFORD,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

CIMARRON ELEVATOR, INC., an

Oklahoma corporation,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 02-6143

(D.C. No. 01-CV-1586-W)

(W.D. Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, HENRY and BRISCOE, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiffs Van and Lois Stafford, appearing pro se, seek to appeal the district

court’s dismissal of their complaint. Because the Staffords have failed to comply with
2

our previously-imposed restrictions on their appellate filings, we dismiss the appeal.

In Stafford v. United States, 208 F.3d 1177 (10th Cir. 2000), we recounted the

Staffords’ history of filing legally frivolous complaints and appeals in an attempt to avoid

paying federal income taxes, and noted we repeatedly had sanctioned them for their

conduct. Because we concluded that our sanctions had not reduced their “frivolous and

vexatious litigation” efforts, we found it necessary to “impose . . . filing restrictions using

our inherent power to regulate federal dockets, promote judicial efficiency, and deter

frivolous filings.” Id. at 1179. In particular, we “enjoined [the Staffords] from filing any

further appeals or original actions in this court involving related tax matters until all

previously-imposed sanctions have been paid in full.” Id.

The Staffords now seek to appeal the dismissal of a complaint they filed in the

Western District of Oklahoma collaterally attacking a 1987 judgment entered against

them in a tax-related matter. Because the Staffords have not fully paid the sanctions

previously imposed against them by this court, they are enjoined from pursuing this

appeal.

The appeal is DISMISSED.

Entered for the Court

Mary Beck Briscoe

Circuit Judge