] K 1d r nf ma and
1 +f at have t be 1uq 1 t
e career, T } W what’s
a est r 5 Ara dut | an
ioes a e ad Amp 1 1 a x C =
uestion of adequacy and completenes \nd
, the == Mc £ the tai pd of a
is ay

of x I we
t i some arificati a ° ) w
se do ~ vt 1 3 1 S 1





DR.

DR.

DR.

DR.

DR.

DR.

MAURO:

MELIUS: Can

ZIEMER:

MELIUS: Can

MELIUS: But

whe
at
s why

r ste
do have

lat

rda and
1 e
on

or

ing & S



there. And based on that, then the Board an say
well, there some issue here. And certainly even
that audit procedure do to be
100 per udi 1 select i
j so on, start pt ng tt t gs
where -- 2 t’s appropri

DR. MAURO: But you

DR. ZIEMER: And I assume your plan will
1 r be to what you

see h this is an

DR. MAURO: And we'll keep

we're going t run i ) st and

h tak
we oO we're

you

know -- and we‘ll give you our reasons why we’re

we’

re going and and I but

appr
as

app ’
you



work correctly. Here‘s the RAC numbers, h

the source we're going
to check t jard quaiit

probi

is, do we believe that source term Se

that’ our plan. I’m h that you agree with
that ‘cause t the o t tt
Finally
DR. ZIEMER: Let's again allow a mo
comments D at Jim has I ave one
ere Oh, you don’t
Well, what you've described for us is in fact

an audit pr -dure.

DR. MAURO:

DR. ZIEMER: And it’s not

necessarily have to approve today. 1 think your

plan will ie nething lines f
j i to us And in an audit

procedure, a certain amount of

results are and report

DR. ZIEMER: You know, we pro

NANCY LEE & ASSOCIAT



DR.

DR.

DR.

DR.

DR.

MAURO:

ZIEMER:

MAURO:

ZIEMER:



r have been designed for

on; another group -- Jo¢

e profile review while I'm doing my

advar i re ew f e moving togethe i
ok tep with t ious m 1ica , the
ff . c w k credibl If .
we’re going to lose a lot f eff er and S
joi t have s and hedule implicati So
r It it
1 yas ¢ Boa view and ew
groups vi that ¢t e f asks are ir S sé
i ated that yo talk about At
sa t ° that in tt sampl |
pr s I dor k a pr ri e ould
that a ios truction would
g rev c rom a site that has t
elected = si f f review, so
DR. MAURO: I ie tand that but sa
- blen
DR. ZIEMER: Right
DR. MAURO: t we’l m
“ ; oe

DR. ZIEMER: Yeah, but let’s there's

NANCY I



DR.

ZIEMER:



H



wha

helper,

that’



appr

>pri



DR.

some

sort

e ce inly idedly
forays into this So t
nly bservat
T in covered
tactica but
evel hat's --
biggest chal
jeliver that £ y A
f you So you
DR. ZIEMER: Thank
MR. FITZGERALD:
DR. ZIEMER: Let’s
yuesti Jim

f on
t b
it
e

th

any

ar
that
r
t



10
ii
12
i3
14
15
16
17
18
i9
20
21
22
23
24

25

257

assuming optimum efficiency, okay? So bear -- I'm
already being a project manager, recognize that we
-- there are some, you know, loop -- places where
we could run at these kinds of problems.

Another observation -- I have two more
observations, then I’m going to turn it over to
Joe. Okay?

When TIT reviewed the Savannah River site
profile, I presumed that the -- all of the site
profiles will have the same fundamental
organization. Let me just reiterate it to you.
One is that you first look at the medical expo--
in this case, after the introduction there’s the
medical exposure records, review that carefully.
That’s, in my opinion, fairly straightforward.
Once you understand the time and the type of
equipment that was used, the protocols are pretty
clear, in my mind, as a health physicist. And we
have the staff -- medical health physicist --
we're okay. We're okay.

Environ-- now here -- the second one is the
occu-- environmental occupational exposures. That
is releases that occur from a facility that may
expose some of the construction workers that we

heard from yesterday. I noticed that what -- what

NANCY LEE & ASSOCIATES



DR. MELIUS: Yeah

i ne t =
1 Ss a e pa g
t E e E he ir la se

me or thec in e a es e e a
DR. MAURO: Therein m x xr
- ae pr 11
e Fos ffi jes ’ |



wi

but 1 want

2 e
chat
j ably 1
tal ar
nstructior 1

u Well
stions ¢



10

il

12

Bb

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

270

narrow down where to get started. In your
planning and sort of to do that efficiently, I
guess sort of how many does it make sense to be
assigned initially or is it -- make sense to say
here's the -- whatever it is, ten, 12, whatever;

go get started and, you know, they'll! be done

under this task order under the -- a year, or is
it, you know, let’s wait three -- you know, do
five now, five in three months, what -- I guess

I'm trying to get some sense of what your
expectations are at this point.

MR. FITZGERALD: Well, you know, I think --
we haven't chatted about the specifics of this,
but certainly my expectations, we would certainly
want to know what the so-called menu would look
like for the year. And I think there’s some merit
-- and again, this is the Board’s purview and
decision, but some merits perhaps in ramping into
it with perhaps somewhat less complex sites
because, again, we’re establishing on the ground
the procedures that we're establishing on paper,
and it certainly would perhaps facilitate things.

Nonetheless, the people that we intend to put
into these reviews are not coming into it as

neophytes. They have the operational experience

NANCY LEE & ASSOCIATES