alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, March 2, 2007.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

      ( print page 7958)    

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-820  Filed 2-20-07; 11:34 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JOSEPH FRANK LEE,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00027-MP -GRJ

ALACHUA COUNTY, ALACHUA COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SADIE DARNELL,

PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, ROBERT WOODY,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 16, Motion to Extend Time by Joseph Frank Lee. 

Plaintiff, moves the Court for a fourteen day extension of time to file objections to the

Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation. Plaintiff states that he has limited access to the

law library. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The motion to extend time to file objections, Doc. 16, is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff may file objections to the report and recommendation on or before June

17, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00027-MP-GRJ Document 17 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 1
<page>
					  EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Managed
Futures HV, L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management LLC,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		May 15, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Dror Svorai, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Onteco Corporation, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Onteco Corporation for quarter ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Onteco Corporation.








DATE: August 22, 2011
By:
/s/Dror SvoraiName: Dror SvoraiTitle: Chief Executive Officer





By:
/s/Dror SvoraiName: Dror SvoraiTitle: Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Onteco Corporation. and will be retained by Onteco Corporation. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

GARNET SHORTRIDGE,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-71-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’ Motion for Second Extension of Time to File

Memorandum of Law. (Doc. 16.) Plaintiff requests a one day extension of time to file

her memorandum. Defendant’s counsel does not object to the requested relief. 

Accordingly, upon due consideration, Plaintiff’s Motion for Second Extension of

Time to File Memorandum of Law (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his

memorandum by September 16, 2011. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 16 day of September, 2011. 

th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00071-MP-GRJ Document 17 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10913

Conference Calendar

 

TERRY JAMES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BEN CLICK; TOBY SHOOK; 

PAUL JOHNSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:98-CV-1153-H

--------------------

October 19, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Terry James, Texas prisoner No. 337449, appeals the district

court’s dismissal, as frivolous, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil

rights claim. The district court did not abuse its discretion in

holding that James’ claim for damages against defendant Toby

Shook was barred by the doctrine of prosecutorial immunity. See

Boyd v. Biggers, 31 F.3d 279, 285 (5th Cir. 1994). James’

remaining claims are barred by the doctrine articulated in Heck

v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). See Hudson v. Hughes, 98 F.3d

868, 872 (5th Cir. 1996).
No. 98-10913

-2-

AFFIRMED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART ON OTHER GROUNDS.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 9, 2015

p1202

Order 

Clerk

December 9, 2015

150624

FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150624

COA: 314652

Iosco CC: 12-007036-CK

FREDERICK J. HOLSTINE,

Defendant,

and

TIMOTHY BIALEK, as Conservator for the

Estate of JOSEPH BIALEK, a Protected 

Individual,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 2, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment

analyzing the coverage issue under the subject policy’s Property Coverage section. That 

section of the policy was irrelevant to the issue of liability coverage in this case. In all 

other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 234 (Thursday, December 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 68896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5948]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


California Bay-Delta Public Advisory Committee Public Meeting 
Cancellation; Federal Register: November 9, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 
217) [Notices] Page 63628-63629] [DOCID:fr09no07-94] [FR Doc. 07-5597 
Filed 11-8-07; 8:45 am]

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Joint meeting of the California Bay-Delta Public Advisory 
Committee and the California Bay-Delta Authority meeting noticed in the 
Federal Register on November 8, 2007, Volume 72, Number 217, Page 
63628-63629, has been cancelled. The subject meeting will be 
rescheduled at a later date which is yet to be determined.

DATES: The meeting was scheduled for Thursday, December 13, 2007, from 
9 a.m. to 4 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Buzzard, U.S. Bureau of 
Reclamation, at 916-978-5022 or Julie Alvis, California Bay-Delta 
Program, at 916-445-5551.

    Dated: November 26, 2007.
Diane A. Buzzard,
Acting Special Projects Officer, Mid-Pacific Region, U.S. Bureau of 
Reclamation.
[FR Doc. 07-5948 Filed 12-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-M
Exhibit 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Marshall Chadwell, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.


/s/   Marshall Chadwell
-------------------------------
Marshall Chadwell
Chief Financial Officer
December 16, 2002




1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

346 

KA 13-00555 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

MARTIN L. WOODWARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

SETH M. AZRIA, SYRACUSE, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MARTIN L. WOODWARD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.

GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (AMY L. HALLENBECK OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Oswego County Court (Walter W.

Hafner, Jr., J.), rendered January 4, 2013. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon a jury verdict, of sexual abuse in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Clinical and Treatment Subcommittee, March 1, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to March 2, 2007, 5 p.m., Double Tree Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 7, 2006, 71 FR 75262.                

New meeting location will be at Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: February 7, 2007.

Anna Snouffer

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-647 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 11.1

                        RDO EQUIPMENT CO. AND SUBSIDIARY
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS




                                                   FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31,
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                     1997                1996
                                                     ----                ----
Pro forma net income                                $  6,483           $  4,841
                                                    --------           --------
                                                    --------           --------

Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding                                            8,400              8,370

Dilutive effect of shares for which proceeds were
necessary to fund the $15 million distribution of
accumulated S corporation earnings                     1,059              1,059

                                                    --------           --------



Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding                                            9,459              9,429
                                                    --------           --------
                                                    --------           --------

Pro forma net income per common share              $    0.68           $   0.51
                                                    --------           --------
                                                    --------           --------


                                       34
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RUDOLPH CHURCHILL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 27 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RUDOLPH CHURCHILL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 28 EAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of September, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 06, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 06, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A22D0055. IMERYS KAOLIN, INC. v. MCDUFFIE COUNTY COMMISSION, et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

20CV303
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sungro Minerals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended May 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

|                    |        |                              
|------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------
|Date:
July 18, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Frederick J. Pucillo, Jr.
|                    | Name:  | Frederick J. Pucillo, Jr.    
|                    | Title: | Chief Executive Officer      



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided Sherb & Co., LP and will be retained by Sungro Minerals, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-2774

___________

Collin Myrlie, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Countrywide Bank; Countrywide Home *

Loans, a subsidiary of Bank of America * [UNPUBLISHED]

(f/k/a Countrywide Financial *

Corporation) Headquarters in Calabasas *

CA, USA, a New York Corporation, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: March 22, 2012

Filed: March 27, 2012

___________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Collin Myrlie appeals from the order of the District Court1

 denying his motion

filed under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking relief from the

adverse grant of summary judgment on his complaint against the mortgage company

and bank involved in the foreclosure sale of his home. Following careful review, we

1

The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota. 
see no abuse of discretion in the District Court’s conclusion that Myrlie did not

present newly discovered evidence or exceptional circumstances warranting relief. 

See Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied,

534 U.S. 975 (2001); see also Harley v. Zoesch, 413 F.3d 866, 871 (8th Cir. 2005)

(“Relief is available under Rule 60(b)(6) only where exceptional circumstances have

denied the moving party a full and fair opportunity to litigate his claim and have

prevented the moving party from receiving adequate redress.”); Alpern v. UtiliCorp

United, Inc., 84 F.3d 1525, 1536–37 (8th Cir. 1996) (noting that where Rule 60(b)(2)

relief was sought based on evidence discovered after a hearing on a summary

judgment motion but before the court granted the motion, a party must have a

justifiable excuse for not timely opposing the motion for summary judgment and must

show that the evidence probably would have produced a different result). 

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________

-2-
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MICHAEL CLEMENTE JOHNSON, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00202-MP-CAS

EDWIN G BUSS, KENNETH S TUCKER, 

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 32, in which the Clerk construes petitioner's

notice of appeal to include a request for Certificate of Appealability. For the reasons stated in

the order at Doc. 28, petitioner's claims are completely foreclosed by the Eleventh Circuit's

decision in Shelton v. Sec'y, Dept. of Corrections, 2012 WL 3641008 (August 24, 2012). 

Therefore, the Court finds that Petitioner fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right and the issues are not adequate enough to deserve encouragement to proceed

further. Accordingly, no certificate of appealability is appropriate in this case. The court also

certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith and proceeding in forma pauperis on appeal is

inappropriate under Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4).

 

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of December, 2012

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Profile MV, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer of Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




























By:
/s/  Jennifer MagroName:
Jennifer MagroTitle:
Chief Financial Officer ofCeres Managed Futures LLC,General Partner of the registrantDate:
May 16, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arrin Background, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harold
Hartley, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

     1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three month
          period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Dated: May 8, 2008
                                       /s/ Harold Hartley
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Harold Hartley
                                       President and Principal Executive Officer