alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
300 S.E.2d 108

#### STATE ex rel. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the COUNTY OF WYOMING v. The STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS, INC.

No. 15643A.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Jan. 28, 1983.

*467D. Grove Moler, Mullens, for appellee.

Marianne Hoover, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charleston, for appellants.

John Everett Roush, Legal Services, School Service Personnel Ass’n, Charleston, for employee Juanita Gibson.

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from a ruling by the Circuit Court of Kanawha County that the State Superintendent of Schools has no authority or jurisdiction to review a decision by a county board of education in a grievance matter. We reverse and remand.

Juanita Gibson was employed under a continuing contract as a school bus driver by the Wyoming County Board of Education. After the county board of education made changes involving her position resulting in a decrease in salary, Gibson filed a grievance. After a hearing, the board denied the grievance. Gibson then appealed to the State Superintendent of Schools, who, upon rehearing, concluded that Gibson’s statutory rights had been violated and ordered that she be returned to her former position and paid a supplemental salary. The board of education then petitioned the circuit Court of Kana-wha County for a writ of certiorari. The circuit court granted the writ and voided the State Superintendent’s ruling on the ground that he lacked authority to review grievance decisions by county boards of education on an appeal by an employee. Gibson and the State Superintendent appealed here, and we granted review.

After the circuit court rendered its decision finding against the State Superintendent, we reached an opposite conclusion in *Jones v. The Board of Education, County of Lincoln,*170 W.Va. 310, 294 S.E.2d 113 (1982). We held in the syllabus:

> “The State Superintendent of Schools may review a decision by a county board of education on appeal by an employee. Certiorari will lie to a circuit court from the State Superintendent’s decision.”

Our decision in *Jones*is controlling. Recognizing this fact, the parties have filed a joint motion urging us to reverse and set aside the judgment appealed from and remand the case for further proceedings. In view of *Jones,*we grant the joint motion, reverse and set aside the order appealed from, and remand the case to the Circuit Court of Kanawha County for further proceedings in certiorari.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following registration statements of Harris Corporation and in the related Prospectuses of our reports dated August 29, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Harris Corporation, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Harris Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended July 1, 2016:





Form S-4No. 333-202539Harris Corporation Shares of Common StockForm S-8No. 333-192735Harris Corporation Retirement PlanForm S-8No. 333-130124Harris Corporation 2005 Equity Incentive PlanForm S-8No. 333-207774Harris Corporation 2015 Equity Incentive Plan





/s/        ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Orlando, Florida


August 29, 2016
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE:

9:30 a.m. Wednesday, January 23, 2008.

# PLACE:

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# STATUS:

The one item is open to the public.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

 

                    7968—                    *Railroad Accident Briefs and Safety Recommendation Letter*                    —(1) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Train Strikes Wayside Worker Near the Dupont Circle Station, Washington, DC., May 14, 2006 (DCA-06-FR-005), and (2) WMATA Train Strikes Wayside Workers Near the Eisenhower Avenue Station, Alexandria, Virginia, November 30, 2006.                

# NEWS MEDIA CONTACT:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, January 18, 2008.

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *http://www.ntsb.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: January 11, 2008.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 08-120 Filed 1-11-08; 1:35 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Bar Group Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Ulrik Gerdes, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: November 16, 2009

| | /s/
      Ulrik Gerdes       
| | -----------------------------
| | Ulrik Gerdes                 
| | Chief Financial Officer      
| | (Principal Financial Officer)

---
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
ECHO GLOBAL LOGISTICS, INC.
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 Of THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Douglas R. Waggoner, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Echo Global Logistics, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date: May 14, 2010

/s/ DOUGLAS R. WAGGONER Douglas R. Waggoner Chief Executive Officer


29

---
HEATHER HEITGER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 0 909

________ _____________________/

Opinion filed November 10, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. Michael A. Flowers , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public

Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pa mela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen H. Liu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Arrin Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Arrin Corporation.


Date: 2/18/11                             By: /s/ Stephen H. Liu
                                             ----------------------------------
                                          Name:  Stephen H. Liu
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *
 
 I, Mercer Cauley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tryon Alpha, Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tryon Alpha, Inc.
 
 Date: February 10, 2011                                                               By:           /s/Mercer Cauley
 Mercer Cauley, President
 Principal Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer
 
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of MPM Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven St. Peter, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Steven St. PeterSteven
      St. PeterPrincipal
      Financial OfficerNovember
      12, 2009
EXHIBIT
31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, James
Kirby, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Precision Petroleum
Corporation;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I
have:
 
 a)
            designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
      prepared;
 
 b)
            evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
      as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this
      annual report (the "Evaluation Date");
and
 
 c)
            presented
      in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
      controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
      Date;
 
 5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 
 a)
            all
      significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
      which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
      summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
      registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;
      and
 
 b)
            any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls; and
 
 6. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 
 Date:
February 19, 2010
 
 
 By:           /s/
James Kirby
 James
Kirby
 Chief
Financial Officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting
officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7544** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Peter J. Messitte , Senior District Judge. ( 8:97

- cr - 00053

- PJM

- 1; 8:16

- cv - 03419

- PJM )

Submitted : January 31 , 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON , KEENAN , and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Damon Emanuel Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Eyler Kaplan, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Damon Eman uel Elliott seeks to appeal the district court’s order d ismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion as successive and unauthorized . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)( 1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Elliott has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 10, 2018

No. 04-17-00405-CR

The State of TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

Callie Mae MERRITT,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 6014

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After we granted Appellee’s first, second, and third motions for extensions of time to file 

the brief, Appellee’s brief was due on April 2, 2018. On April 9, 2018, Appellee filed a fourth

motion for an extension of time to file the brief and the brief. 

Appellee’s fourth motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is deemed timely filed.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of April, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 11, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 13000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1005]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Sunshine Act Meeting

ACTION:  Notice of a partially open meeting of the Board of Directors 
of the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Time and Place:  Thursday, March 13, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will 
be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20571.

Open Agenda Items:  Item No. 1: Local Cost Policy, OECD Rule Change.

Public Participation:  The meeting will be open to public participation 
for Item No. 1 only.

Further Information:  For further information, contact: Office of the 
Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Tele. No. 
202-565-3957).

Howard A. Schweitzer,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 08-1005 Filed 3-6-08; 4:17 pm]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
Miller, Diane M.

From: Alan Fellman PhD CHP [afellman@radtrain.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 3:12 PM

To: NIOCINDOCKET@CDC.GOV

Subject: comment on 42 CFR Part 82

RevComment on 42

CFR Part 82.4...
Please see attached file. Thank you.

Alan Fellman
Radiation Safety Academy


Comments on 42 CFR Part 82, Methods for Radiation Dose Reconstruction Under the
Energy Employees Occupational IlIness Compensation Program Act of 2000; Interim
Final Rule With Request for Comments

Alan Fellman, Ph.D., C.H.P.
Radiation Safety Academy
481 N. Frederick Ave.

Suite 302

Gaithersburg, MD 20877
301-990-6006

Claimants filing for compensation under the EEOICPA consist of persons with
potentially fatal cancers. When faced with this type of knowledge, most persons respond
with feelings related to two questions: 1) why me?, and 2) how long do I have left before
I die? A common human response when a person is confronted with cancer is to look for
someone or something to blame for their condition, since clearly they deserve better. In
short, these individuals may require counseling that addresses their feelings and fears as
much their need to understand the technical aspects of the dose reconstruction and
probability of causation process. Most importantly, they will need counseling that helps
them address their emotions associated with becoming stricken with cancer and whether
their disease is related to occupational radiation exposure.

These needs will not be met under the protocols described in the interim final rule, which
call for an average 60-minute initial interview and 5-minute closing interview.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) has determined that the renewal of the Washington, DC District Advisory Council is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Administrator, U.S. Small Business Administration by 15 U.S.C. 633. This determination follows consultation with the Office of Management and Budget and with the Management Secretariat, General Services Administration. 

*Name of Committee:*                     Washington, DC District Advisory Council.                 

*Purpose and Objective:*                     The Council provides advice and opinions regarding the effectiveness of and need for SBA programs, particularly within the local districts which members represent. Its members provide an essential connection between SBA, SBA program participants, and the local small business community.                 

*Balanced Membership Plans:*                     The required minimum membership is 9 members. SBA selects members predominantely from the private sector, including people from such industries as retail, manufacturing, and financial services. Members also include representatives from academia, the media, and appropriate Federal, State and local agencies.                 

*Duration:*                     Continuing.                 

*Responsible SBA Officials:*                     Antonio Doss, Acting District Director, Washington, DC District Office, U.S. Small Business Administration, 740 15th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.                 

Meredith Davis, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 08-111 Filed 1-15-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M