alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011228EN.01000402.xml

| 3.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6257 — Blackstone/Valad Property)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 228/04

On 29 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6257. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6257. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Friday, February 23, 2007.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Closed.

Matter to be Considered: 1. Personnel Matter. Closed pursuant to 
Exemptions (2) and (6).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-890 Filed 2-22-07; 3:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
Exhibit 23.2









                        INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-54792 (effective February 1, 2001 and amended on February 13, 2001) of
Avenue Entertainment Group, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-3 of our report,
dated March 28, 2002, which includes an emphasis paragraph relating to an
uncertainty as to the Company's ability to continue as a going concern,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Avenue Entertainment Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2001.




SINGER LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP

Los Angeles, California
April 12, 2002
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WARNDELLA JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 1:11-cv-94-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion To Correct Scrivener’s Error In The

Case Style Regarding The Spelling of the Plaintiff’s First Name. (Doc. 6.) Plaintiff

advises that her first name was spelled incorrectly in the case style. 

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED: 

1. Plaintiff’s Motion To Correct Scrivener’s Error In The Case Style Regarding

The Spelling of the Plaintiff’s First Name (Doc. 6) is GRANTED.

2. The Clerk is directed to correct the style of the case to reflect the Plaintiff’s

name as Warndella Johnson. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 17 day of May 2011. 

th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00094-MP-GRJ Document 7 Filed 05/17/11 Page 1 of 1
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

|CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
|------------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350              
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                          
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Bar Group Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Ulrik Gerdes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: May 13, 2011

| | /s/
      Ulrik Gerdes       
| | -----------------------------
| | Ulrik Gerdes                 
| | Chief Financial Officer      
| | (Principal Financial Officer)

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolfe Creek Mining, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Kristen Paul, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
13th day of October, 2008.


/s/ Kristen Paul
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Jeptha Van Vliet et al., as Executors of Anna Van Vliet, Deceased.

Appeal — modification by Appellate Division as to costs — appeal may be taken of right to Court of Appeals.

An order of the Appellate Division modifying a surrogate’s decree in respect of the award of costs is one of modification within the meaning of subdivision 1 of section 190 of the Code of Civil Procedure and an appeal to the Court of Appeals may be taken of right.

Reported below, 181 App. Div. 879.

(Submitted April 22, 1918;

dccided June 4, 1918,)

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 21, 1918, modifying and affirming as modified a decree of the Queens County Surrogate’s Court overruling objections to the accounts of the executors of Anna Van Vliet, deceased.

*Selden Bacon*for motion.

*John Ewen*and *R. W. Kellogg*opposed.

*Per Curiam.*

The Appellate Division modified the surrogate’s decree in respect of the award of costs. The order was, therefore, one of modification within the meaning of section 190, subdivision 1, of the Code of Civil Procedure, and an appeal to this court may be taken of right. The appellant is not required to show that the modification resulted to her prejudice. The statute contemplates an appeal to this court whenever the Appellate Division has found error in the whole of in any part of the judgment or final order before it for review. On the ground that leave to appeal is unnecessary the motion is denied, without costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 29, 2007, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its                           ( print page 72389)                        membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, AIM—USA, LLC, Omaha, NE has been added as a party to this venture. Also, Data Design Corporation, Gaithersburg, MD has withdrawn as a party to this venture. In addition, ASCOR has changes its name to Gigatronics, Fremont, CA.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. the Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on march 8, 2001 (66 FR  13971).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 7, 2007. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on November 7, 2007 (72 FR 62867).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-6124 Filed 12-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RAYL LYNN KELLAR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00059-MP-GRJ

L CARRERO, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL AUTHORITY, J GONZALEZ, C L WEST, JR, R

WOLF,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 8, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, which recommends that plaintiff’s complaint, Doc. 1, be dismissed without prejudice,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, for abuse of the judicial process. Plaintiff has not objected to the

recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 5, is ACCEPTED

and incorporated herein.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint, Doc. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28

U.S.C § 1915A.

3. The dismissal of this case shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(g).

Case 1:11-cv-00059-MP-GRJ Document 9 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

4. The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, Doc. 3, and motion to amend complaint and demand for jury

trial, Doc. 6.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of September, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:11-cv-00059-MP-GRJ

Case 1:11-cv-00059-MP-GRJ Document 9 Filed 09/27/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Autobytel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the
Report), we, Richard A. Post, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael F. Schmidt, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    RICHARD A. POSTRichard A. Post Chief Executive Officer May 31, 2005/s/    MICHAEL F.
SCHMIDTMichael F. Schmidt Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer May 31, 2005




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

IVORY LEE ROBINSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-0043-MP-AK

SECRETARY, DEPT. OF

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

 AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner seeks habeas corpus relief in connection with

his 2002 Alachua County convictions for attempted second degree murder and

possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, for which he received a mandatory

minimum sentence of 25 years imprisonment. Petitioner previously sought habeas

corpus relief from the same convictions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court

denied that petition on the merits and denied Petitioner’s request for a certificate of

appealability. Robinson v. McDonough, case no. 1:06-cv-0061-MP-AK, Docs. 23, 29

(N.D. Fla. June 16, 2008). The Eleventh Circuit also denied Petitioner’s request for a

certificate of appealability. Id. Doc. 37.

When a state prisoner is “in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court,”

his petition for a writ of habeas corpus is governed by both § 2241 and the restrictions

set forth in § 2254. Medberry v. Crosby, 351 F.3d 1049, 1062 (11th Cir.2003). In order

to file a second or successive § 2254 petition, the petitioner must first obtain an order
Page 2 of 2

from the court of appeals authorizing the district court to consider it. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(b)(3)(A). Absent authorization, the district court lacks jurisdiction to consider a

second or successive petition. See Farris v. United States, 333 F.3d 1211, 1216 (11th

Cir.2003) (addressing a successive motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255).

 There is nothing in the record that reflects that Petitioner has been granted leave

by the Eleventh Circuit to file a second or successive habeas corpus petition, and thus

this Court lacks the authority to entertain Petitioner’s claims.

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the petition for a

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Doc. 1, be DISMISSED.

IN CHAMBERS this 11th day of March 2011. 

áBZtÜç eA ]ÉÇxá 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), a party may file specific, w ritten

objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 14 days after

being served w ith a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may

respond to another party’s objections within 14 days after being served with

a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No: 1:11-cv-0043-MP-AK
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report
of Voice Assist, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Metcalf, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Michael Metcalf                                   | 
|----------------------------------------------------- | 
|Michael Metcalf                                       | 
|Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | 
|August20, 2012                                        |
<Page>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc. on form S-8 (file numbers 333-28217 and 333-28219)
of our report dated January 31, 2001, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc, and Subsidiary as of
December 31, 2000, and for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, which
report is included in this Annual Report on form 10-KSB.

                              Robinson Burdette Martin Seright & Burrows, L.L.P.

Lubbock, Texas
March 4, 2002
Exhibit 23.10

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-86860, 333-46542, 333-112952,
333-114521, and 333-115194 on Form S-3, and Nos. 333-52514, and 333-74339 on Form S-8 of our report, dated
June 24, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Isonics Corporation for the year ended April 30, 2005.

/s/HEIN & ASSOCIATESLLP

Denver,
Colorado
June 24, 2005



QuickLinks
ex42.htm












CLEANER YOGA MAT, INC.


 SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT







The Investor named below, by payment of the purchase price for such Common Shares, by the delivery of a check payable to CLEANER YOGA MAT, INC., hereby subscribes for the purchase of the number of Common Shares indicated below of CLEANER YOGA MAT, INC., at a purchase of $0.10 per Share as set forth in the Prospectus.







By such payment, the named Investor further acknowledges receipt of the Prospectus and the Subscription Agreement, the terms of which govern the investment in the Common Shares


being subscribed for hereby.







A. INVESTMENT:               (1) Number of Shares ___________________________












(2) Date of Investor's check _______________________







B. REGISTRATION:







(3) Registered owner: __________________________







Co-Owner: __________________________________







(4) Mailing address: ___________________________







City, State & zip: _________________________







(5) Residence Address (if different from above):







=================================================







(6) Birth Date: ______/______/______







(7) Employee or Affiliate: Yes ______ No ______







(8) Social Security: #: ______/______/______







U.S. Citizen [ ] Other [ ]







Co-Owner Social Security:







#: ______/______/______







U.S. Citizen [ ] Other [ ]







Corporate or Custodial:







Taxpayer ID #: ______/______/______







U.S. Citizen [ ] Other [ ]







(9) Telephone (H) ( ) ______________________







(10) *email address:__________________________


*Please note that by providing your email address, you accept that all further communications between you and the Company shall be by email, unless otherwise required by law and/or the rules and regulations of any governing body of traded securities.














  





1











  






C. OWNERSHIP







[ ] Individual Ownership                        [ ] IRA or Keogh







[ ] Joint Tenants with Rights of Survivorship







[ ] Trust/Date Trust Established_______________







[ ] Pension/Trust (S.E.P.)







[ ] Tenants in Common                                           [ ] Tenants by the Entirety







[ ] Corporate Ownership                                         [ ] Partnership







[ ] Other_____________________







D. SIGNATURES


Registered Owner: _____________________________







Co-Owner: _____________________________







Print Name of Custodian or Trustee: _____________________________







Authorized Signature: _____________________________







Date: _____________________







Signature: ___________________________________







MAIL TO:                                Cleaner Yoga Mat, Inc.


1370 Sawleaf Ct.


San Luis Obispo, CA 93401


____________________________________________________________________


FOR OFFICE USE ONLY:


Date Received: ________________________________________________


Date Accepted/Rejected ________________________________________


Subscriber's Check Amount: _______________________


Check No. ___________________ Date Check ________________


 






  





2
Exhibit 10.33

GRAPHIC

March 30,
2005

Mr. Scott
D. Peters
c/o Golf Trust of America, Inc.
10 N. Adger's Wharf
Charleston, SC 29401

RE:
Golf Trust of America, Inc.: Amendment to Employment Agreement

Dear
Scott:

With
reference to that certain (i) Fourth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") dated August 29, 2003, by and between you and Golf Trust of
America, Inc. (the "Company"), executed by you for the benefit of the Company, (ii) Master Pledge Agreement dated February 26, 2001, by and between you and the Company (the
"Pledge Agreement"), and (iii) the non-recourse Master Promissory Note dated February 26, 2001 executed by you for the benefit of the Company (the "Note" and together with
the Employment Agreement and Pledge Agreement, the "Agreements"), and in consideration of the modified obligations of the respective parties hereto, you (the "Executive") and the Company hereby agree
as follows:



---





---





If
the foregoing correctly reflects our understandings, please execute this letter agreement and return a duly executed copy thereof to the undersigned.

Thank
you.



|AGREED TO AND APPROVED BY:                              |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|                                                        |  | 
|Scott D. Peters Date: March 30, 2005 ("Effective Date") |  | 

---



QuickLinks