alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011187EN.01001101.xml

| 28.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 June 2011

2011/C 187/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4205 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4580 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88970 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1929 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1849 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7845 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,442 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,96 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0024 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2220 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3352 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3605 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4056 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0621 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7677 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7641 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 541,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8039 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2038 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3703 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 249,99 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3439 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,935 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2441 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,893 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2750 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9253 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,9760 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4205

JPY

Japanese yen

114,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4580

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88970

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1929

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1849

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7845

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,442

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,96

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0024

RON

Romanian leu

4,2220

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3352

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3605

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4056

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0621

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7677

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7641

KRW

South Korean won

1 541,88

ZAR

South African rand

9,8039

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2038

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3703

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 249,99

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3439

PHP

Philippine peso

61,935

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2441

THB

Thai baht

43,893

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2750

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9253

INR

Indian rupee

63,9760

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0551 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JADE HUNTER KERR,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 1 2 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 5 2023

06/05/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0551
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JAMES BIRDSONG and KATHY

BIRDSONG,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv196/RS-MD

THOMAS EHLKE and OCEAN TERRACE

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. OF

PANAMA CITY,

Defendants.

____________________________________

THOMAS EHLKE,

Third-Party Plaintiff,

vs.

PEOPLES FIRST INSURANCE

SERVICES, LLC,

Third-Party Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Joint Agreed Motion To Bifurcate Third-Party Complaint And To

Extend Discovery Deadlines As To Original Complaint (Doc. 42).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. All discovery for Defendant’sThird-Party claim against Third-Party Defendant

shall be completed not later than February 14, 2011. 

2. Motions for summary judgment as to Defendant’s Third-PartyComplaint shall
be filed not later than February 24, 2011. Responses to those motions for

summary judgment shall be filed no later than March 7, 2011.

3. Jury trial of Defendant’s Third-Party Complaint against Third-PartyDefendant

is scheduled for April 18, 2011, in Panama City, Florida. 

4. All other schedules and deadlines in the Scheduling and Mediation Order 

(Doc. 26) remain unchanged.

ORDERED on December 17, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Alcantara Brands Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carlos
Alcantara, President and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
      Carlos AlcantaraCarlos
      AlcantaraPresident
      andPrincipal
      Financial OfficerAugust
      13, 2008
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 30, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60697 Summary Calendar

SI SOUNDONE, Petitioner, versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A70 455 171

-------------------- Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Si Soundone, a native and citizen of Laos, petitions this court for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. In rejecting Soundone’s appeal, the BIA adopted the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) findings that Soundone lacked credibility. We hold that the IJ’s credibility findings were reasonable and supported by substantial evidence. See Chun v.
INS , 40 F.3d 76, 79 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, Soundone’s petition for review is DENIED.
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sungro Minerals Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Mal Bains, President and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

| Date: July 15, 2008
 
/s/ Mal Bains
 
 
Mal Bains		President and Treasurer 		(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sungro Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Sungro Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.] |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jordan Michael Barton , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00006

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 336th District Court of

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR

- 17

- 26358 ). Memor andum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Stevens

, Justice van Cleef

and Justice Rambin participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We fur ther order that the appellant, Jordan Michael Barton , pay all costs incurred by

reason of this appeal.

RENDERED MAY 17, 2023
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
'

Exhibit 32

ISONICS CORPORATION

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350  Principal Executive Officer

To my knowledge: the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2004, containing financial statements for the year then
ended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Isonics Corporation for the periods presented.

|July 28, 2004                                                                 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/JAMES E. ALEXANDERJames E. Alexander
Chief Executive Officer and President |  | 

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350  Principal Financial Officer

To my knowledge: the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 2004, containing financial statements for the year then
ended, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934; and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Isonics Corporation for the periods presented.

|July 28, 2004                                   |  | 
|----------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/JOHN SAKYSJohn Sakys
Chief Financial Officer |  | 



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.
Bryant Kirkland III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.










March 31, 2003                    /s/ J. BRYANT KIRKLAND III
                                  ---------------------------------------------
                                  J. Bryant Kirkland III
                                  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ETHAN R GORDON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00111-WS-GRJ

LEMON, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Defendant Woods’ Motion for Enlargement of Time. 

(Doc. 36.) Counsel for Defendant Woods seeks an additional forty-five days to respond

to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint in order to obtain and review documents

relevant to this case before drafting an appropriate response. Counsel represents that

she was unable to confer with Plaintiff, who is no longer incarcerated, as required by

Local Rule 7.1(B)(1) because Plaintiff has not provided his phone number. Because

there are a number of defendants, who have not been served, no undue delay or

prejudice will result from the extension. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Defendant Woods’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (Doc. 36) is GRANTED.

Defendant Woods shall file his response to the Complaint by March 25, 2011. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 8 day of February, 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
Texas State Board of Pharmacy 

Gunter Hotel 

San Antonio, Texas 

Gentlemen: ATTRRTIOR: W. Ii. Coualns 

Opinion Ro. O-3109 

Re: Whether Pharmacy' Board may 

confiscate certificate from 

foreign state oft pharmacist 

not registered In Texas. 

This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of 

January 30, 1941, requesting the opinion of this department 

upon the following matter: 

"Does the Texas State Board of Pharmacy 

have the power or right to confiscate any certificate held by a person not registered as a 

pharmacist'ln Texas, but who is registered by 

some other state, and who is using his certlficate issued by that state to practice pharmacy 

In Texas, displaying and exhibiting same as a 

subterfuge to the public?" 

We have carefully examined the provisions of Chapter 

8 of Title 71 of the Revised Civil Statutes relating to the 

practice of pharmacy In this State and the powers and duties 

of the State Board of Pharmacy; yet, we have been unable to discover that the Legislature has authorized the Board or Its 

agents to confiscate a certificate to practice pharmacy issued 

by a foreign state and used by a pharmacist in Texas as a subterfuge to practice pharmacy In this State without registration. 

Of course, as we pointed out in Opinion No. O-2321, 

if a pharmacist registered in another state practices in this 

state without license from the State Board of Pharmacy, or does 

not operate under the direct supervision of one so registered, he 

will be committing a misdemeanor in violation of Article 758a of 

Vernon's Annotated Penal Code. 
Texas State Board of Pharmacy, Page 2 

However, It is the opinion of this Department and 

you are advised that the State Board of Pharmacy has no power 

or authority to confiscate a certificate to practice pharmacy 

Issued by another state used as a subterfuge by a pharmacist 

to practice in this State without registration. 

Yours very truly, 

JDS:JS:hep 

APPROVED FEB 4, 1941 

Gerald C. Mann 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

APPROVED 

OPINION 

COMMITTEE 

BY BWB 

CHAIRMAN 

By a/ James D. Smullen 

James D. Smullen 

Assistant
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8425]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-845]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-10: OTS Nos. 19027, H-4310, and H-4359]


People's Bank, People's Mutual Holdings, and Peoples' United 
Financial, Inc., Bridgeport, CT; Approval of Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on February 14, 2007, the Assistant 
Managing Director, Examinations and Supervision--Operations, Office of 
Thrift Supervision (OTS), or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated 
authority, approved the application of People's Mutual Holdings and 
People's Bank, Bridgeport, Connecticut, to convert to the stock form of 
organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by 
appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81d1f4e3ede8e2afc8efe7eec1ced5d2afd5f3e4e0f2afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ffaf8a9d93969cd1b6919990bfb0abacd1ab8d9a9e8cd1989089">[email protected]</span></a>) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, 
NW, Washington, DC 20552, and OTS Northeast Regional Office,. 
Harborside Financial Center Plaza Five, Suite 1600, Jersey City, NJ 
07311.

    Dated: February 21, 2007.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision,
Sandra E. Evans,
Legal Information Assistant.
[FR Doc. 07-845 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-07-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Understanding and Selecting 

Respiratory Protection Devices 

While it is your employer's responsibility to provide 

policies, programs, training, and guidance on respirator 

use, it is the healthcare workers who implement these 

procedures. Do you know when to use respiratory 

protection? If so, do you understand what type of 

protection to choose and how to use it properly? 

or 

N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator Surgical Mask 

Seasonal Influenza 

Patient with suspected or confirmed seasonal influenza. 

Close contact 

Surgical mask 

equivalent or higher 

Aerosol-generating procedure 

N95 Filtering Facepiece 

Respirator (FFR) equivalent or 

higher 

Airborne Precautions 

Patient with suspected or confirmed infectious 

disease requiring airborne precautions (e.g., measles, 

tu bercu Iasis) 

Close contact 

N95 FFR equivalent 

or higher 

Aerosol-generating procedure 

N95 FFR equivalent or higher 

Droplet Precautions 

Patient with suspected or confirmed infectious disease 

requiring droplet precautions (e.g., pertussis) 

Close contact 

Surgical mask 

equivalent or higher 

Aerosol-generating procedure 

Surgical mask equivalent 

or higher 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
**Exhibit 15.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-13008) pertaining tothe VimpelCom 2000 Stock Option Plan of our report dated March 31, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Open Joint Stock Company Vimpel-Communications, included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) of Open Joint Stock CompanyVimpel-Communications, for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

Ernst & Young LLC 

Moscow, Russia 

May 6, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5547 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5547

  To amend the Violence Against Women Act of 2000 to reauthorize the 
  grant program for education, training, and enhanced services to end 
         violence against and abuse of women with disabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 18, 2018

 Mr. Calvert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Violence Against Women Act of 2000 to reauthorize the 
  grant program for education, training, and enhanced services to end 
         violence against and abuse of women with disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Certainty, Assistance, and Relief 
for Everyone Act'' or the ``CARE Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF GRANT PROGRAM FOR EDUCATION, TRAINING, AND 
              ENHANCED SERVICES TO END VIOLENCE AGAINST AND ABUSE OF 
              WOMEN WITH DISABILITIES.

    Section 1402 of the Violence Against Women Act of 2000 (34 U.S.C. 
20122) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e), by striking ``2018'' and inserting 
        ``2023''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(f) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
the Certainty, Assistance, and Relief for Everyone Act, the Attorney 
General shall issue a report identifying and describing best practices 
for State, local, and tribal law enforcement officers and prosecutors 
in investigating and prosecuting sexual assault cases involving the 
victimization of individuals with disabilities.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12
 
                        AMENDMENT 1 TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
 
    Amendment 1 as of November 20, 1998 by and between Axel Johnson Inc., a
Delaware corporation ("Axel Johnson"), and Larscom Incorporated, a Delaware
corporation ("Larscom").
 
                                  WITNESSETH:
 
    WHEREAS, Axel Johnson and Larscom are parties to a certain Credit Agreement
dated December 24, 1996 (the "Credit Agreement"); and
 
    WHEREAS, the Credit Agreement will, by its terms, terminate on December 24,
1998; and
 
    WHEREAS, Axel Johnson and Larscom desire to extend the term of the Credit
Agreement and to make such other amendments thereto as are deemed necessary.
 
    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
 
    1.  The Term shall terminate on December 24, 2000.
 
    2.  All notices to Larscom pursuant to Section 13 of the Agreement shall be
addressed as follows:
 
       Larscom Incorporated
 
       1845 McCandless Drive
 
       Milpitas, CA 95035
 
    Attention: Vice President--Finance / Chief Financial Officer
 
    3.  Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the
meanings attributed to them in the Credit Agreement.
 
    4.  Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions in the
Credit Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
 
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment 1 to be
duly executed and delivered by their respective duly authorized officers as of
the date first above written.
 
                                     LARSCOM INCORPORATED
 
                                     By: /s/ Bruce D. Horn
                                     Its: V.P Finance, CFO
 
                                     AXEL JOHNSON INC.
 
                                     By: /s/ Signe S. Gates
                                     Its: Vice President, General Counsel and
                                        Corporate Secretary