Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Notices 8401 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: SemiAnnual Progress Report for Grantees of 

the Legal Assistance for Victims Grant 

Program. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form Number: 1122–0007. 

U.S. Department of Justice, Office on 

Violence Against Women. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: The affected public includes 

the approximately 200 grantees of the 

Legal Assistance for Victims Grant 

Program (LAV Program) whose 

eligibility is determined by statute. In 

1998, Congress appropriated funding to 

provide civil legal assistance to 

domestic violence victims through a setaside under the Grants to Combat 

Violence Against Women, Public Law 

105–277. In the Violence Against 

Women Act of 2000 and again in 2005, 

Congress statutorily authorized the LAV 

Program. 42 U.S.C. 3796gg–6. The LAV 

Program is intended to increase the 

availability of legal assistance necessary 

to provide effective aid to victims of 

domestic violence, stalking, or sexual 

assault who are seeking relief in legal 

matters arising as a consequence of that 

abuse or violence. The LAV Program 

awards grants to law school legal 

clinics, legal aid or legal services 

programs, domestic violence victims’

shelters, bar associations, sexual assault 

programs, private nonprofit entities, and 

Indian tribal governments. These grants 

are for providing direct legal services to 

victims of domestic violence, sexual 

assault, and stalking in matters arising 

from the abuse or violence and for 

providing enhanced training for lawyers 

representing these victims. The goal of 

the Program is to develop innovative, 

collaborative projects that provide 

quality representation to victims of 

domestic violence, sexual assault, and 

stalking. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond/reply: It is estimated that it will 

take the approximately 200 respondents 

(LAV Program grantees) approximately 

one hour to complete a semi-annual 

progress report. The semi-annual 

progress report is divided into sections 

that pertain to the different types of 

activities that grantees may engage in 

and the different types of grantees that 

receive funds. An LAV Program grantee 

will only be required to complete the 

sections of the form that pertain to its 

own specific activities. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The total annual hour burden 

to complete the data collection forms is 

400 hours, that is 200 grantees 

completing a form twice a year with an 

estimated completion time for the form 

being one hour. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Bryant, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Suite 1600, Patrick 

Henry Building, 601 D Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: February 21, 2007. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. E7–3183 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FX–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Open Mobile Alliance 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

January 18, 2007, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the 

Open Mobile Alliance (‘‘OMA’’) filed 

written notification simultaneously with 

the Attorney General and the Federal 

Trade Commission disclosing changes 

in its membership. The notifications 

were filed for the purpose of extending 

the Act’s provisions limiting the 

recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 

damages under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, 2–800 Mobiles Inc., New 

York, NY; Ad Vitam, Olivet, FRANCE; 

Advanced Strategies Corp., Garden City, 

NY; Along Mobile Technologies, Inc., 

Xi’an City, Shaanxi Province, PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Alox Co., Ltd., 

Kangnam-gu, Seoul REPUBLIC OF 

KOREA; Anyka (Guangzhou) Software 

Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, 

Guangdong, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

CHINA; ATIO Corporation, Coombe 

Place, Rivonia, SOUTH AFRICA; CA 

Inc., Islandia, NY; Calton Hill, 

Edinburgh, UNITED KINGDOM; Cell 

Guide, Rehorot, ISRAEL; Ceno 

Technologies, Ltd., Shanghai, PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA; China 

Telecommunications Corporation, 

Beijing, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

CHINA; Cyberlink Corporation, HsinTien City, Taipei Hsien, TAIWAN; 

Datang Mobile Communication 

Equipment Co. Ltd., Beijing, PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA; DGIST, DeoksanDong, Daegu, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; 

Digital Connect PTE Ltd., Singapore, 

SINGAPORE; DKI Technology Inc., 

Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Elcoteq 

SE, Salo, FINLAND; Estacado Systems, 

LLC, Dallas, TX; Frost & Sullivan China, 

Beijing, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

CHINA; GaeaSoft Corporation, Seoul, 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Gemalto N.V., 

Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS; GMV 

Soluciones Globales Internet, S.A., 

Madrid, SPAIN; Hanmaro Co. Ltd., 

Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; IfEN 

GmbH, Poing, GERMANY; Marvell 

International Ltd., Hamilton, 

BERMUDA; Miyowa, Marseille, 

FRANCE; Mobiletop Co., Ltd. Seoul, 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Monotype 

Imaging Inc., Woburn, MA; MOSSEC—

Mobile Security Software, Madrid, 

SPAIN; Motive, Inc., Austin, TX; Movell 

Software, Santa Clara, CA; MStar 

Semiconductor, Inc., Hsinchu Hsien, 

TAIWAN; NineOne Co., Ltd., Kyongsan, 

Kyong-Buk, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; 

NOW Wireless Ltd., Croydon, UNITED 

KINGDOM; NXP Semiconductors, 

Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS; Perlego 

Systems, Inc., Gig Harbor, WA; Pointsec 

Wireless Solutions, Stockholm, 

SWEDEN; Protect Software GmbH, 

Dortmund, GERMANY; Purple Labs 

S.A., Le Bourget Du Lac, FRANCE; SIRF 

Technologies, San Joe, CA; Smith Micro 

Software, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sonus 

Networks, Inc., Chelmsford, MA; Square 

Enix, Inc., El Segundo, CA; Synkia Sp. 

z.o.o., Krolewska, NORWAY; 

TechnoCom Corporation, Carlsbad, CA; 

Telefonica S.A., Madrid, SPAIN; 

TeleworX Group, Inc., McLean, VA; 

Trademobile Limited, Wakatipu, New 

Zealand; Trango Systems, Grenoble, 

FRANCE; U-blox AG, Thalwil, 

SWITZERLAND; Unichal Inc., Seoul, 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA Virtual Logix, 

Monigny-le-Bretonneux, FRANCE; Visa 

International Services Association, 

Foster City, CA; Vodaphone IT 

Hizmetleri A.S., Istanbul, Turkey; W2bi, 

Inc., Union, NJ; Webmessenger Inc., 

Tujunga, Ca; WINIT, Daejeon, 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA; and 

WISEWIRES Inc., Seoul, REPUBLIC OF 

KOREA, have been added as parties to 

this venture. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
8402 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Notices 

Also, Axalto S.A., Meudon Cedex, 

FRANCE; BDR Customer Management 

Ltd., Wooburn Green, Buckinghamshire, 

UNITED KINGDOM; Cognizant 

Technology Solutions Ltd., London, 

UNITED KINGDOM; Gemplus S.A., 

Cedex, La Ciotat, FRANCE; and JRD 

Communication Inc., Shanghai, 

PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, have 

withdrawn as parties to this venture. 

Also, Vantrix Corporation has 

changed its name to VoiceAge 

Networks, Montreal, Quebec, CANADA. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and OMA intends 

to file additional written notifications 

disclosing all changes in membership. 

On March 18, 1998, OMA filed its 

original notification pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the Act. The Department of 

Justice published a notice in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on December 31, 1998 (63 FR 

72333). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on July 13, 2006. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on August 9, 2006 (71 FR 45580). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 07–837 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—VSI Alliance 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

January 12, 2007, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), VSI 

Alliance has filed written notifications 

simultaneously with the Attorney 

General and the Federal Trade 

Commission disclosing changes in its 

membership. The notifications were 

filed for the purpose of extending the 

Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of 

antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages 

under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, Synplicity, Inc., 

Sunnyvale, CA; and Altera Corp., San 

Jose, CA have been added as parties to 

this venture. Also, Toshiba Corp., 

Kawasaki, JAPAN; FZI—

Forschungszentrum Informatick and der 

University, Karlsruhe, GERMANY; 

LTRIM Technologies, Inc., Laval, 

Quebec, CANADA; and Hewlett-Packard 

Company, Palo Alto, CA have 

withdrawn as parties to this venture. 

No other changes have been made in 

either the membership or planned 

activity of the group research project. 

Membership in this group research 

project remains open, and VSI Alliance 

intends to file additional written 

notifications disclosing all changes in 

membership. 

On November 29, 1996, VSI Alliance 

filed its original notification pursuant to 

Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department 

of Justice published a notice in the 

Federal Register pursuant to Section 

6(b) of the Act on March 4, 1997 (62 FR 

9812). 

The last notification was filed with 

the Department on October 23, 2006. A 

notice was published in the Federal 

Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the 

Act on November 22, 2006 (71 FR 

67643). 

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 07–836 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Submission for OMB Review: 

Comment Request 

February 20, 2007. 

The Department of Labor (DOL) has 

submitted the following public 

information collection requests (ICR) to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 

44 U.S.C. chapter 35). A copy of each 

ICR, with applicable supporting 

documentation, may be obtained from 

RegInfo.gov at http://www.reginfo.gov/ 

public/do/PRAMain or by contacting 

Darrin King on 202–693–4129 (this is 

not toll-free number) / e-mail: 

king.darrin@dol.gov. 

Comments should be sent to Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attn: OMB Desk Officer for the Mine 

Safety and Health Administration 

(MSHA), Office of Management and 

Budget, Room 10235, Washington, DC 

20503, Telephone: 202–395–7316 / Fax: 

202–395–6974 (these are not toll-free 

numbers), within 30 days from the date 

of this publication in the Federal 

Register. 

The OMB is particularly interested in 

comments which: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Agency: Mine Safety and Health 

Administration. 

Type of Review: Extension without 

change of currently approved collection. 

Title: Ventilation Plans, Tests and 

Examinations in Underground Coal 

Mines. 

OMB Number: 1219–0088. 

Type of Response: Recordkeeping and 

Reporting. 

Affected Public: Private Sector: 

Business or other for-profit. 

Number of Respondents: 612. 

Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 1,848,393. 

Average Response Time: varies by 

task and size of mine. 

Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 

1,824,456. 

Total Annualized capital/startup 

costs: $0. 

Total Annual Costs (operating/ 

maintaining systems or purchasing 

services): $160,203. 

Description: Section 303 of the 

Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 

1977 requires that all coal mines shall 

be ventilated by mechanical ventilation 

equipment installed and operated in a 

manner approved by an authorized 

representative of the Secretary and such 

equipment shall be examined daily and 

a record shall be kept of such 

examination. 

Underground coal mines usually 

present harsh and hostile working 

environments. The ventilation system is 

the most vital life support system in 

underground mining and a properly 

operating ventilation system is essential 

for maintaining a safe and healthful 

working environment. Lack of adequate 

ventilation in underground mines has 

resulted in fatalities from asphyxiation 

and explosions. 

An underground mine is a maze of 

tunnels that must be adequately 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES