alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned certifies that
this periodic report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Golf Trust of America, Inc.

|Date: March 31, 2008 |  | /s/MICHAEL C. PEARCEMichael C. Pearce President and Chief Executive
Officer
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |                                                                            
|Date: March 31, 2008 |  | /s/TRACY S. CLIFFORDTracy S. Clifford Chief Financial
Officer              

---



QuickLinks
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON 

STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) 

) DIVISION ONE 

r•-) 

--.-- 

..,-.J 

.__ 

cr) `r,:-. 

fr. 

Respondent, ) 70 CD --.1 _ 

) No. 74246-9-1 I

-11,.........., 

0-, 

V. ) (PSI .... . 

) UNPUBLISHED OPINION -4- rSTEVE THOMAS YOUNG, ) 9? , tr) 

Appellant. 

) 

) FILED: March 6, 2017 CJI 

) 

DWYER, J. — Steve Young was charged and convicted of arson in the first 

degree. The sentencing court imposed a standard range sentence of 23 months 

imprisonment. On appeal, Young contends that the trial court erred in instructing 

the jury on the concept of reasonable doubt. This is so, he avers, because the 

court gave as its instruction the jury instruction defining "reasonable doubt" set 

forth at 11 Washington Practice: Washington Pattern Jury Instructions: Criminal 

4.01, at 85 (3d ed. 2008) (WPIC). Young contends that this instruction 

unconstitutionally undermines the presumption of innocence and shifts the 

burden of proof to the defendant. We disagree and affirm. 

1 

Young contends that WPIC 4.01, which states "[a] reasonable doubt is 

one for which a reason exists and may arise from the evidence or lack of 
No.74246-9-1/2 

evidence," unconstitutionally undermines the presumption of innocence and 

shifts the burden of proof to the defendant. This is so, he asserts, because 

WPIC 4.01 instructs jurors that they must be able to articulate a reason for 

having a reasonable doubt. The trial court did not err in so instructing the jury. 

Our Supreme Court has mandated that an instruction in the words of 

WPIC 4.01 be given in all cases. State v. Bennett, 161 Wn.2d 303, 318, 165 

P.3d 1241 (2007). The constitutionality of the challenged instruction has been 

reaffirmed. State v. Kalebaugh, 183 Wn.2d 578, 586-87, 355 P.3d 253 (2015). 

We have recognized this controlling authority. State v. Lizarraga, 191 Wn. App. 

530, 567, 364 P.3d 810 (2015), review denied, 185 Wn.2d 1022 (2016). The trial 

court did not err by doing the same. 

In any event, WPIC 4.01 does not require jurors to articulate a reason. 

"[A] doubt for which a reason exists" is not the same as "a doubt for which a 

reason can be given." Kalebaugh, 183 Wn.2d at 584. Young's argument is 

meritless. 

II 

Young requests that no costs associated with his appeal be assessed 

against him, as he was found indigent by the trial court. Pursuant to RAP 14.2, 

we may exercise our discretion not to impose appellate costs. State v. Sinclair, 

192 Wn. App. 380, 393, 367 P.3d 612, review denied, 185 Wn.2d 1034 (2016). 

The State does not contest his claim. Accordingly, we exercise our discretion 

and will not impose appellate costs against Young. 

2 
No.74246-9-1 /3 

Affirmed. 

3 

We concur:
<PAGE>

                                       
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc. on Form S-8 (file numbers 333-28217 and 
333-28215) of our report dated February 12, 1999, on our audits of the 
consolidated financial statements of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc. and 
Subsidiary as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the years ended December 
31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is included in this annual Report on 
Form 10-KSB.

                                       Robinson Burdette Martin & Cowan, L.L.P.

Lubbock, Texas 
March 11, 1999
Opinion issued October 13, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-20-00643-CV

———————————

IN RE STUART GOSCH AND BRENDA GOSCH, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Stuart Gosch and Brenda Gosch, have filed a petition for a writ of 

mandamus challenging the trial court’s August 24, 2020 order denying their

motion to compel real party in interest, O’Malley Construction, Inc., “to produce 

documents, namely bank statements for accounts utilized for the receipt and 

expenditure of funds related to the construction of [relators’] home, which are 
2

relevant and essential to the prosecution of [relators’] claims for alter ego and 

misapplication of trust funds.”

1

We deny the petition. All pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Goodman, and Countiss.

1 The underlying case is Stuart Gosch and Brenda Gosch v. O’Malley Construction, 

Inc., Robert O’Malley and Patricia O’Malley, Individually, Cause No.

17-04-24250, pending in the 506th District Court of Waller County, Texas, the 

Honorable Albert M. McCaig, Jr. presiding.
# C_2010286EN.01001001.xml

| 22.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/10

---

Recruitment notice PE/128/S

2010/C 286/06

The European Parliament is organising the following selection procedure:

| — | PE/128/S — Head of Unit (AD 9) — European Parliament Information Office in Budapest |
| --- | --- |

—

PE/128/S — Head of Unit (AD 9) — European Parliament Information Office in Budapest

PE/128/S

This selection procedure requires a level of education which corresponds to completed university studies attested by a diploma which is officially recognised in an EU Member State.

By the closing date for the submission of applications, and after gaining the qualifications referred to above, candidates must have acquired professional experience of at least 10 years relevant to the job description, including three years in a managerial position.

The recruitment notice has been published in Hungarian only. The full text is available in that language in Official Journal C 286 A.

---
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Explore Anywhere Holding Corp.  ("Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Khris Thetsy, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 14, 2012
/s/ Khris ThetsyKhris ThetsyCFO (Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
Occupational Respiratory Protection Authority by Federal Agency

Approval Requirements

NIOSH

1

NIOSH tests and approves respirators to general construction, quality assurance, and performance requirements for 

use in U.S. workplaces. This includes evaluating respirators on the market to ensure that they continue to meet 

requirements and issuing notices2 to clarify requirements, retract approvals, and provide other guidance. 

Healthcare NIOSH and the FDA have a collaborative and streamlined process3 to ensure that surgical N95 respirators meet the 

requirements of both agencies. 

Mining NIOSH and MSHA jointly determine whether a respirator intended for mine rescue or other mine emergencies meets 

the requirements of both agencies. MSHA species the amount of time that the respirators must provide breathable air. 

Workplace Use Requirements

OSHA When respirators are needed, OSHA requires employers to have a respiratory protection program that includes the use 

of NIOSH-approved respirators, employee medical evaluations, t testing, training, respirator maintenance, and hazard 

evaluations for proper respirator selection. Additional industry-specic requirements may be imposed by other federal 

agencies. 

MSHA Workplace use requirements within the mining industry are established by MSHA rather than OSHA.

FDA FDA may issue Emergency Use Authorizations during public health emergencies to increase the supply of respirators 

for healthcare personnel, such as authorizing the use of respirators that are not NIOSH approved. 

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Occupational Safety and Health Administration 

 (OSHA), Mine Safety Health Administration (MSHA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

2. NIOSH Conformity Assessment Notices: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/resources/pressrel/letters/default.html

3. FDA/CDC NIOSH MOU: https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/domestic-mous/mou-225-18-006 

 September 2021
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Work Group on Mound

Cincinnati Airport Marriott 

2395 Progress Dr. 

Hebron, KY 41048 

859-586-0166 

Conference Call Number: 

Participant Pass Code: 

1/05/10 (page 1 of 2) 

9:30 Welcome 

 NIOSH - Neutron doses reconstruction: issues 14&15 

 11:00 Break 

NIOSH - Radon: issue 2 

12:30 Lunch 

1:30 NIOSH - Stable tritium compounds: issue 6 

2:30 Break 

NIOSH - Adequacy/completeness of internal dose 

 records: issues 11, 12, 13 
 AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Work Group on Mound

Cincinnati Airport Marriott 

2395 Progress Dr. 

Hebron, KY 41048 

859-586-0166 

Conference Call Number: 

Participant Pass Code: 

1/06/10 (page 2 of 2) 

9:30 Welcome 

 NIOSH - High-Fired PU-238: issue 9 

11:00 Break 

 SC&A - “Road Map” Integrated: issues 1,3,4,7 & 8 

12:00 Lunch 

 NIOSH/SC&A - Remaining closure issues: 

 Beta/shallow dose: issue 16 

 PAAA violations: issue 21 

 D&D: issue 10 

2:30 Break 

 Wrap up discussion by Work Group/remaining discussion
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5432 

To deauthorize a water resources project at Bridgeport Harbor, Connecticut. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2018 

Mr. HIMES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To deauthorize a water resources project at Bridgeport 

Harbor, Connecticut. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BRIDGEPORT HARBOR, CONNECTICUT. 

4 Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, that 

5 portion of the project for navigation, Bridgeport Harbor, 

6 Connecticut, authorized by the Rivers and Harbors Act 

7 of June 18, 1878 (20 Stat. 158), and as modified by the 

8 Rivers and Harbors Acts of August 11, 1888 (25 Stat. 

9 401), March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1122), June 25, 1910 (36 

10 Stat. 633), and July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 919), and lying 

11 upstream of a line commencing at point 627942.09 N, 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5432 IH

1 879709.18 E thence running southwesterly about 125 feet 

2 to a point 627832.03 N, 879649.91 E is no longer author3 ized. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 50 (Thursday, March 13, 2008)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 13727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1032]



[[Page 13725]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part V





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of March 11, 2008--Continuation of the National Emergency With 
Respect to Iran


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 50 / Thursday, March 13, 2008 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 13727]]

                Notice of March 11, 2008

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Iran

                On March 15, 1995, by Executive Order 12957, the 
                President declared a national emergency with respect to 
                Iran pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 
                Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the 
                unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 
                States constituted by the actions and policies of the 
                Government of Iran. On May 6, 1995, the President 
                issued Executive Order 12959 imposing more 
                comprehensive sanctions to further respond to this 
                threat, and on August 19, 1997, the President issued 
                Executive Order 13059 consolidating and clarifying the 
                previous orders.

                Because the actions and policies of the Government of 
                Iran continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary 
                threat to the national security, foreign policy, and 
                economy of the United States, the national emergency 
                declared on March 15, 1995, must continue in effect 
                beyond March 15, 2008. Therefore, in accordance with 
                section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 
                U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the 
                national emergency with respect to Iran. Because the 
                emergency declared by Executive Order 12957 constitutes 
                an emergency separate from that declared on November 
                14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, this renewal is 
                distinct from the emergency renewal of November 2007. 
                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    March 11, 2008.

[FR Doc. 08-1032
Filed 3-12-08; 9:14 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
# C_2011255EN.01000102.xml

| 31.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6304 — Carlyle/Gores Broadband)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 255/02

On 10 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6304. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6304. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
01-27-06 P12:45 IN

pom P?, deeb
dear Die. ;

SA ngnec att Lhe federcl gerecrment Caentel,
newbie Lhat (gp a — fee frm han
cwerbas Bc Canee HF beatin. Bevefe ’

The saspthel tube sohire Jeict aeppleiaid apyoloid
Awe - the Aud) Canter ho here effort
A taditnc would be ped,

Atesntaig & Latrir p, peechuee ihe hoe
the mes Dh ae fled . wt

Lbav Dee ee a ep acten oye LO COreece Carece
awe Ad fent pe chon ehpecerd ar hh fund tag fae .
eee pac facend aed Le hha fia prarine forefel wdc
ttt Aevckl ,

limyene ole Aweded AedaLier, eapeccally he
atl Aabtigle Ceneetae dthecll be etepe bergpbu:
Case 3:11-cr-00034-LC   Document 3   Filed 04/19/11   Page 1 of 10

Case 3:11-cr-00034-LC   Document 3   Filed 04/19/11   Page 2 of 10

Case 3:11-cr-00034-LC   Document 3   Filed 04/19/11   Page 3 of 10

Case 3:11-cr-00034-LC   Document 3   Filed 04/19/11   Page 4 of 10

Case 3:11-cr-00034-LC   Document 3   Filed 04/19/11   Page 5 of 10

Case 3:11-cr-00034-LC   Document 3   Filed 04/19/11   Page 6 of 10

Case 3:11-cr-00034-LC   Document 3   Filed 04/19/11   Page 7 of 10

Case 3:11-cr-00034-LC   Document 3   Filed 04/19/11   Page 8 of 10

Case 3:11-cr-00034-LC   Document 3   Filed 04/19/11   Page 9 of 10

Case 3:11-cr-00034-LC   Document 3   Filed 04/19/11   Page 10 of 10
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

YANCEY JACK GARRINGER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO.: 3:11cv174/MCR/CJK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

____________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated June 16, 2011. The petitioner previously has been furnished a

copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made

a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely

filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 13) is DISMISSED with prejudice, as petitioner has not demonstrated

entitlement to proceed under that section.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2011.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00174-MCR-CJK Document 16 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 1
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00062 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JEREMIAH FIELDS , Appellant ,
v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

On appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County , Texas. 

## O R D E R
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Longoria Order Per Curia m
Appellant, Jeremiah Fields, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his
conviction in trial court cause number S

- 13

- 3297

- CR . The trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant d oes not have the right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4.2

Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, L. Chris Iles , is hereby ORDERED to: 1) re view the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counse l is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of receipt of this notice, identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 44.3, 44.4; see also, e.g., Carroll v. State, No. 0 4

- 03

- 00473

- CR, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7317 (San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (designated for publication) (certification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case law, and any factual allegations therein must be true and supported by the record. Cf. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25. 2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1, 10.2. PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b). Delivered and filed the 4th day of February 2014

.
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


September 18, 2014


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, New Jersey Municipal Portfolio
of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 5


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, New Jersey Municipal Portfolio of Closed-End Funds Trust, Series 5 set forth above
(the “Trust”). We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices
indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on September 18, 2014, in accordance with the
valuation method set forth in the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as
the party performing the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-197825) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an
exhibit thereto.


 




 







	 	Very truly yours,

	 	/s/
GERARDO CIPRIANO

	 	

Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President