alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6507

MAURICE CORTEZ PROCTOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND; STUART SIMMS,

State’s Attorney for Baltimore City; TIMOTHY

DOORY, Assistant State’s Attorney for Baltimore City; PATRICIA JESSEMY, State’s Attorney

for Baltimore City; STEPHANIE LANE-WEBER,

State Attorney General for Maryland; J. JOSEPH

CURRAN, JR., Attorney General for Maryland,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01-

317-L)

Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Cortez Proctor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Maurice C. Proctor appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Proctor’s motion for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. Proctor v. City of Baltimore, MD, No. CA-01-

317-L (D. Md. filed Mar. 6, 2001; entered Mar. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Miller, Diane M. _

Se _ - —— —
From: _ .

Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 4:37 PM

To: NIOCINDOCKET@CDC.gov

Subject: special COHORT statis for nevada test site workers
Dear sir

Because most former nucelair weapons workers have been far less than
informed about the procedures and standards of the energy workers
compensation plan .--THE ACT-- we have only reasonently found out of what
rules apply.

l only yesterday diiscover the sec 3626 of --THE ACT--where as it states
that groups may apply for special COHORT statis.

lalso noticed that the cut off date is aug 26th 2002. monday.

| would like to request that you extend this dead line so that my attorney
has time to explore such oppinions of oppertunity,.If you will not do this
then please consider this email as a request by the nevada test site workers
to be covered by SEC 3626 of the ACT.

'am requesting this on behalf of all nevada test site workers not just
myself. | feel we should qualify because The Dept of Energy kept very poor
if any radation exposure records. the Dept of energy has also admitted in
public and in the news that they had been less than honest in keeping such
records and as of this time can not produce any records for thr majority of
the people who worked their.

As to the NIOSH reconstruction of DOSE.from what i have read , although
their is no concesouse as to how it should be done most so called experst
agree that we should get nothing. that is hardly the fair and understanding
and compasionate review we were promised by the president the congress and
senate.and it is contradictory to the entire format of this entire
program.

i would like an acknowledgement of this email.and i would also like to know
if #1 you would consider extending the date of aug 26th 2002 or if you would
consider this email as a legal request that has conformed to your aug thew
26th dead line.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

______________________

STATON TECHIYA, LLC, 

Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG 

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., 

Appellees

______________________

2024-1548

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2022-

01106.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 24-1548 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 06/18/2024
2 STATON TECHIYA, LLC V. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

June 18, 2024

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: June 18, 2024

Case: 24-1548 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 06/18/2024
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aden Solutions Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Silvia Soltan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 23rd day of April, 2009.



| | SILVIA SOLTAN                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Silvia Soltan,                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Aden Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Aden Solutions Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5391 

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees furloughed during 

a Government shutdown. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2018 

Mr. BEYER (for himself, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. 

DESAULNIER, Mr. POCAN, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Ms. NORTON, 

Mrs. COMSTOCK, Mr. KILMER, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Ms. 

SHEA-PORTER, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. MENG, Mr. 

LOWENTHAL, Ms. PINGREE, Mr. TAKANO, Mr. BROWN of Maryland, Mr. 

HOYER, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. DELANEY, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. VARGAS, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, Ms. DELAURO, Mr. 

PAYNE, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. KUSTER of New Hampshire, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N

of New Mexico, Mr. COLE, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Mr. LANGEVIN, 

Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mrs. LOWEY, Mrs. 

BUSTOS, Ms. MOORE, Mr. SOTO, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. CLAY, Ms. 

ESHOO, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. MCEACHIN, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE

of Pennsylvania, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. FOSTER, Mr. O’HALLERAN, Mrs. 

WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. COURTNEY, Ms. LEE, Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. 

WELCH, Mr. COOPER, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. 

ADAMS, Mr. COHEN, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, 

Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Ms. HANABUSA, Ms. 

STEFANIK, Mr. VELA, Mr. MICHAEL F. DOYLE of Pennsylvania, Ms. 

PLASKETT, Mr. GRIFFITH, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. 

LAWSON of Florida, Mr. MCNERNEY, Ms. ESTY of Connecticut, Mr. 

EVANS, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Mr. COSTA, Ms. BLUNT

ROCHESTER, Mr. PANETTA, Mr. JONES, Mr. CORREA, Mr. CRIST, Ms. 

BORDALLO, Mrs. DEMINGS, Mr. PETERSON, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. NORCROSS, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. SMITH of Washington, and Mr. SIRES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5391 IH

A BILL 

To provide for the compensation of Federal employees 

furloughed during a Government shutdown. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Employee Ret5 roactive Pay Fairness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES FUR7 LOUGHED DURING A GOVERNMENT SHUT8 DOWN. 

9 Federal employees furloughed as a result of any lapse 

10 in appropriations that begins on or about March 23, 2018, 

11 shall be compensated at their standard rate of compensa12 tion, for the period of such lapse in appropriations, as soon 

13 as practicable after such lapse in appropriations ends. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
#### Lawrence Edward Brown, II, *etc., et al. v.*Town of Montgomery, *etc., et al.*

(No. 14029)

Decided March 28, 1978.

*Louis R. Tabit, George A. Daugherty*for appellants.

*Charles M. Vickers, George L. Vickers*for appellees.

Per Curiam:

This is an appeal by an infant plaintiff and his father whose personal injury action was dismissed by the Circuit Court of Fayette County on February 4, 1977, because plaintiffs did not comply with W.Va. Code, 8-12-20, which then required that notice of a claim against municipalities be filed within thirty days after a cause of action accrues.

*371This Court, in the consolidated cases of *O’Neil and Hendrickson v. City of Parkersburg,*W.Va., 237 S.E.2d 504 (1977), held that this statute violated the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions. Syllabus Point 2 reads:

> “The notice of a claim provision provided for in W. Va. Code, 8-12-20, as enacted by the Legislature in 1969, is violative of the equal protection and due process clauses of our state and federal constitutions and is unconstitutional.”

Appellees, however, first urge that we reconsider our ruling declaring the statute unconstitutional. This we decline to do.

Appellees also argue that, in any event, the rule announced in the *O’Neil and Hendrickson*case should not be applied retroactively.

The instant case had not become final at the time of this Court’s decision in *O’Neil and Hendrickson.*In fact, the appeal was filed in this Court on September 22, 1977, two days after our *O’Neil and Hendrickson*decision. Moreover, plaintiffs unsuccessfully urged the trial court to consider the validity of the notice provision of W.Va. Code, 8-12-20. These facts, without more, require rejection of appellee’s contention respecting non-retroactivity.

The judgment of the Circuit Court of Fayette County is therefore reversed and the case is remanded for trial.

*Reversed and remanded.*
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION of
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of EF Johnson Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael E. Jalbert, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ MICHAEL E. JALBERT Michael E. Jalbert Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 31, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                  5 



         

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF PRIME SUCCESSION,  INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES,
FOR THE YEAR  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               1,147 
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                       17,803 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         2,087 
<INVENTORY>                                          4,761 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    22,820 
<PP&E>                                              75,420 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       5,907 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     391,122 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               15,952 
<BONDS>                                            221,426 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                                 0 
<OTHER-SE>                                         128,888 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       391,122 
<SALES>                                             98,005 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    98,005 
<CGS>                                               65,713 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       65,713 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    14,698 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5,811 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  24,195 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (6,600) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                           364 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (6,964) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
                                                   
                                                         
<NET-INCOME>                                        (6,964) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        





</TABLE>
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 5:11cv176-RH/GRJ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RAY CHARLES MOBLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv176-RH/GRJ

BAY COUNTY et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 6. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is dismissed 

without prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on December 19, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-00176-RH-GRJ Document 9 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-8279-2] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The EPA's EFAB will hold an open meeting of the full board in Atlanta, GA on March 19-20, 2007. EFAB is an EPA advisory committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) to provide advice and recommendations to EPA on creative approaches to funding environmental programs, projects, and activities.

                        The purpose of this meeting is to hear from informed speakers on environmental finance issues, proposed legislation, Agency priorities, and to discuss progress with work products                               ( print page 7872)                            under EFAB's current Strategic Action Agenda.                    

Environmental financing topics expected to be discussed include: Financial Assurance Mechanisms, Environmental Management Systems, Smartway Transport Program, and Water Infrastructure Financing.

This meeting is open to the public, however, seating is limited. All members of the public who wish to attend the  must register in advance, no later than Friday, March 2, 2007.

# DATES:

Full Board Meeting is scheduled for March 19, 2007 from 1 p.m.-5 p.m. and March 20, 2007 from 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Hilton Atlanta Hotel, 255 Courtland Street, NE., Atlanta, GA 30303.

# REGISTRATION AND INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        To register for this meeting or get further information please contact Alecia Crichlow, U.S. EPA, at (202) 564-5188 or                         *crichlow.alecia@epa.gov*. For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Alecia Crichlow. To request accommodations of a disability, contact Alecia Crichlow, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.                    

Dated: February 8, 2007.

Joseph L. Dillon,

Director, Office of Enterprise Technology and Innovation.

[FR Doc. 07-748 Filed 2-20-07; 8:45am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Aampro Group, Inc. (“Aampro”) because of questions regarding the adequacy and accuracy of information in Aampro's public filings concerning, among other things: (1) The company's business operations, (2) the company's business combinations, and (3) the company's current financial condition. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST January 10, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EST on January 24, 2008. 

By the Commission. 

Nancy M. Morris, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 08-104 Filed 1-11-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

____________ No. 23

- 30087

____________ Fucich Contracting, Incorporated; Kathleen Fucich; Clayton Fucich,
Plaintiffs

— Appellants ,

versus

Shread

- Kuyrkendall & Associates, Incorporated; St. Bernard Parish; XL Specialty Insurance Company; Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America,
Defendants

— Appellees

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:18

- CV

- 2885

______________________________ Before Higginbotham , Smith , and Higginson , Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *

AFFIRMED . Appellant s have not identified any reversible error of law in either the district court’s denial of partial summary judgment or the court’s judgment following the bench trial

. See 5th Cir. R. 47.6

.

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir

. R

. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 28, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-30087 Document: 152-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/28/2024
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 23, 2008)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 22047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1182]



[[Page 22045]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Executive Order 13463--Amending Executive Orders 13389 and 13390


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 79 / Wednesday, April 23, 2008 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 22047]]

                Executive Order 13463 of April 18, 2008

                
Amending Executive Orders 13389 and 13390

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 
                Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended (42 
                U.S.C. 5121-5206), it is hereby ordered as follows:

                Section 1. Executive Order 13389 of November 1, 2005, 
                as amended, is further amended:

                (a) in subsection 2(a), by striking ``Economic Policy'' 
                and inserting in lieu thereof ``Homeland Security and 
                Counterterrorism''; and

                (b) in section 5, by striking ``3 years from the date 
                of this order'' and inserting in lieu thereof 
                ``February 28, 2009''.

                Sec. 2. Subsection 5(b) of Executive Order 13390 of 
                November 1, 2005, is amended:

                (a) by striking the comma after ``applicable law'' and 
                inserting ``and''; and

                (b) striking ``3 years from the date of this order'' 
                and inserting in lieu thereof ``February 28, 2009''.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    April 18, 2008.

[FR Doc. 08-1182
Filed 4-22-08; 8:34 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P