alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report
of Voice Assist, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donna Moore, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Donna Moore                                                      | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Donna Moore                                                          | 
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | 
|August 20, 2012                                                      |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

STEVEN WALSBERG,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11cv06/RS-GRJ

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14). 

Plaintiff has not filed objections.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. The Amended Complaint (Doc. 6) is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§1915 (e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted and for failure to exhaust available administrative remedies.

3. Plaintiff’s Amended Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 7) is

denied.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

Case 5:11-cv-00006-RS-GRJ Document 15 Filed 06/13/11 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED on June 13, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00006-RS-GRJ Document 15 Filed 06/13/11 Page 2 of 2
67 

- - 

OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

'8 Annotatab Clrll Statuta8, a8 
I

_Son. 6. X. Filler, pa60 2 

‘;. 68 

per nanth. Prorl484 that in oountlor h8ring 8 

r 

pul8tlon of not lo** than thirty-fir8 thouwind 

35,000) ~4 not aOr8 tb A l i&htr thousand (60,000) 

an4 0ontaM.n~ a oity oi aor than Want -nine 

thouund (29,000) population, oa* jur8nl i 8 olfloer 

may b0 appoint06 br th* Commie8lonar8~ Court, rhea 

in thdr opinion tha 8~~;008 or ruoh orrioor 18 

n*o484, who88 mmla~ shmU not oxowl Two Hundred 

DolL8r8 ($200) per month an4 a x nr er no t to l x o 884 

TWO Xuadr84 ad lfrtf Dollars ( r 250) per year, Ur4 

aa In ruoh oouatl~* thr Comdrdonora~ court uy 

l ppolnt an l **l*tant to tha mid jur*nilr orrioor, 

whoa in thrlr opinion 8uoh 88818t8nt ir n808888rFJ 

Who80 aalarp l h811 not l roood Oao Hun4re4 8n4 tifty 

Dollar8 (31501 per month. Prort484 further that, 

in oouutler hsring 8 pa ulation OS not la** th8a 

twenty thouran (20,000 P 8n4 not iarm* thsn l lghty 

thou*snb (gO,OOO), as 8houn by the 1940 todora 

Canrur or any future Foboral Conrur an4 whloh 

ham an ar*rr*r& valuation of taubi* proprrtr of 

not 1808 than Yourtwm bAllion Five iiunilred Thourand 

Dollar8 (jU,,500 000) and not nor0 than Slxtarn 

mr,llllon Dollar0 $16,OOO,OOO), on0 juvrr~llr ofrioer t a ey bo l ppolntod by the COmal8alaner8' COUrt, when 

in their judgcwnt l uah oifloer la n*odob, who *hall 

reoeivo a 8alary nd to *x0084 Two XunfArob Dollar8 

(b200) per month. 

wS81ar18* 0r pia jursnllr orfioerr an4 thalr 

l 88l*tant* *hall be rixe4 by the coaml88lonor** 

Court, not to *x0884 th8 8um8 horrln mentioned, ma 

any bill tor th0 l xpmir0a not l xo00ding the 8u.w 

haroln prorid* ior, l hall,~bo oortlfled by the 

oounty judga l * bolng neoerury in th* perforaanor 

or thr duties 0r a 5uronl18 orriarr. Tha cammiealoner** Court of the oounty 8hall prorid* tha 

neooraary fun48 for the pa$moLit OS ularlor an4 

l ~p 0n808 or the 5~~8n110 orrloorr pwt48a ror ln 

thin Aot.+ * +" 
Hon. 9. Mb Plller, pa40 3 

Th8 rboro guoto4 prrtr 0s 8814 Artlol* 

prorl8lon8 48sling with ths qu88tlon8 wk84 

opir~lon Tsflor County la thonbr ruthorirrd 

jurOnli8 orriorr not to l xoe04 tru sum 0s on8 mmu-ou mm 

honty-fire DOU8rS ($125) pr math. 

NO protl8lon is ma48 than&a for t&o ppMt or .sR~@@@ 

to or rot th8 bsn8rit 0s juruu8 0rri00r8 to l wntios 8itorto4 

88 Taylor count 18 th0nrore, Tlfkr Gout7 ournot py ta or 

for thr b0mit 0s i t8 JUTS~~ 0mnr uiy 8u8 a8 l ~pn808~ 

Tours mrf tsar, 

ATToluGcr 0mswI CR TNXM 

Br 0, 

8 

2z4FL-z 

fas,‘n. B00#8tt 

mrirtant 

.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5454 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5454

 To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide that individuals in 
prison shall, for the purposes of a decennial census, be attributed to 
    the last place of residence before incarceration, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2018

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide that individuals in 
prison shall, for the purposes of a decennial census, be attributed to 
    the last place of residence before incarceration, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Correct the Census Count Act''.

SEC. 2. RESIDENCE OF INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS.

    Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (h); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:
    ``(g)(1) Effective beginning with the 2020 decennial census of 
population, in taking any tabulation of total population by States 
under subsection (a) for purposes of the apportionment of 
Representatives in Congress among the several States, the Secretary 
shall, with respect to an individual incarcerated in a State, Federal, 
county, or municipal correctional center as of the date on which such 
census is taken, attribute such individual to such individual's last 
place of residence before incarceration.
    ``(2) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary shall consult 
with each State department of corrections to collect the information 
necessary to make the determination required under paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011234EN.01000101.xml

| 10.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6297 — Sealed Air/DHI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 234/01

On 2 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6297. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6297. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion person privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group, Reproduction, Andrology, and Gynecology Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         March 19-20, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Residence Inn by Marriott—Pentagon City, 550 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dennis Leszczynski, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health, and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-2717,                         *leszczyd@mail.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 21, 2007.

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-932 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EX-10.40



 Exhibit 10.40 
 September 4, 2014 
 Electronic Cigarettes International Group 

Attention: Brent Willis 
 1135 Apple Drive

 Nunica, MI 49448 
  

	Re:	Termination of Buy-side Advisory Agreement between Fields Texas Limited LLC. and Electronic 


	Cigarettes	International Group Ltd. (f/k/a Victory Electronic Cigarettes Corporation) 

 Dear Brent, 
 This letter is to confirm the mutual decision to terminate the buy-side advisory
agreement entered into between Fields Texas Limited LLC. and Electronic Cigarettes International Group Ltd. (“ECIG”) on April 28, 2014 (the “BSAG”). In addition to terminating the BSAG, Fields Texas Limited LLC has agreed to
surrender 69,000 warrants issued as a result of the Must Have Ltd. acquisition, 90,000 warrants issued as a result of the asset purchase from Hardwire Interactive Ltd., and any and all warrants resulting from the pending acquisition of Ten Motives
Ltd. ECIG will honor the outstanding cash payments related to its advisory work for both Must Have Ltd. and Ten Motives Ltd., both of which are due at the time of closing the offering. 
 Our joint execution below will confirm this agreement. 
 Best regards. 

 

			
	FIELDS TEXAS LIMITED LLC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ William Fields
	Its:	 	Chairman

 Agreed and acknowledged: 
  

			
	 ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES INTERNATIONAL
 GROUP LTD.

		
	By:	 	/s/ Brent Willis
	Its:	 	Chairman And CEO
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### APR 1 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MARSHALL LOUIS WASHINGTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-8047 (D.C. No. 95-CR-57-4-J) (D. Wyo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before BRORBY, EBEL, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ** Mr. Washington pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of various controlled substances and was sentenced to 90 months imprisonment and four years supervised release. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) & 846. Prior to sentencing, he sought leave to withdraw his guilty plea on the grounds of newly discovered evidence. He contended that his arrest, which led to a search incident- 2 -

to arrest and discovery of contraband, was the result of execution of an invalid state bench warrant. The bench warrant was issued after Mr. Washington failed to respond to an order to show cause, however, the order was not served upon Mr. Washington, although one attempt was made. We review the denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea for an abuse of discretion, reversing only if the district court’s decision was unjust or unfair. United States v. Carr , 80 F.3d 413, 419 (10th Cir. 1996). Had the district court determined that Mr. Washington’s position on the bench warrant had merit, it would have allowed withdrawal. R. Vol. Six, Tr. 58 (3/28/96 hearing). We need not discuss all of the factors normally attendant to withdrawal of a guilty plea, see United States v. Guthrie , 64 F.3d 1510, 1513 (10th Cir. 1995), because the district court was correct that the bench warrant was valid even though the underlying show cause order indicated only one unsuccessful attempt at service. See Wyo. R. Cr. P. 42(c)(3). Having stopped Mr. Washington on suspicion of driving under the influence, the arresting officer’s reliance on the bench warrant was objectively reasonable. See Arizona v. Evans , 115 S. Ct. 1185, 1193-94 (1995). Thus, the arrest and search incident to arrest are not deficient and the district- 3 -

court did not abuse its discretion in holding Mr. Washington to his plea. AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated September 6, 2000, included in the Thousand
Trails, Inc. (the "Company") Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2000, into
previously filed registration statements covering the Company's 1991 Employee
Stock Incentive Plan, 1993 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan, 1993
Director Stock Option Plan, 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1999 Stock Option
and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan and the Stock Option Agreement dated as of
August 1, 1996, between the Company and William J. Shaw.



/s/  Arthur Andersen LLP
-------------------------------



Dallas, Texas,
    September 6, 2000
# C_2011003EN.01000101.xml

| 6.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6056 — DnB NOR Bank/Bank DnB NORD)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 3/01

On 15 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6056. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6056. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ERIC JERELL WILSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CR-01-983; CA-04-22509-2)

Submitted: October 17, 2005 Decided: November 14, 2005

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Jerell Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Brent Alan Gray, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

For the purpose of this appeal, we assume the date appearing

on the envelope containing the notice of appeal is the earliest

date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for

mailing to the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack,

487 U.S. 266 (1988). The earliest date on the certificate of

service was not attested to by a declaration under penalty of

perjury or a notarized statement, and the evidence of the date of

mailing and receipt by the district court suggests a date of

delivery to the prison mailbox later than the date on the document.

See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1746 (2000). 

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Eric Jerell Wilson seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the

notice of appeal was not timely filed.

When the United States or its officer or agency is a

party, the notice of appeal must be filed no more than sixty days

after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order,

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the district court extends the

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is

“mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr.,

434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361

U.S. 220, 229 (1960)).

The district court’s judgment was entered on the docket

on April 7, 2005. The notice of appeal, postmarked June 21, 2005,

was received by the district court on June 24, 2005.* Because

Wilson failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an
- 3 -

extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2010304EN.01000102.xml

| 10.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6008 — IK/GHD)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 304/02

On 29 October 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6008. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6008. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SHARON HIERS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-306/RS-MD

MURPHY OIL USA, INC. 

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice (Doc. 40). 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this case is dismissed without prejudice. 

ORDERED on August 15, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00306-RS-CJK Document 41 Filed 08/15/11 Page 1 of 1