alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 567 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 567

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the application of the 
   restriction on the appointment of relatives to a position in the 
              Federal Government, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2017

 Ms. Sanchez (for herself, Ms. Shea-Porter, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Kaptur, 
     Mr. Blumenauer, Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico, Mr. 
O'Halleran, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Butterfield, 
Mr. Langevin, Mr. Ellison, Ms. Jayapal, Ms. Pingree, and Mr. Sarbanes) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the application of the 
   restriction on the appointment of relatives to a position in the 
              Federal Government, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Relatives in Government Getting 
Employment Dishonorably Act'' or the ``RIGGED Act''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYMENT OF RELATIVES; RESTRICTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3110 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(A) by inserting ``, including 
                the White House Office and the Executive Office of the 
                President'' after ``Executive agency'';
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as 
                paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and
                    (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) `civilian position' means any existing or newly 
        created position in an agency, including a position acting in a 
        professional or official capacity as a consultant or advisor, 
        regardless of whether such position is voluntary, gratuitous, 
        or authorized by law to be compensated;'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``A public official may 
        not'' and inserting ``Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, a public official may not''; and
            (3) in subsection (c)--
                    (A) by inserting ``shall be removed immediately 
                and'' after ``in violation of this section''; and
                    (B) by striking ``as pay'' and inserting ``as 
                salary or expenses''.
    (b) Application of Prohibited Personnel Practices.--Section 
2302(a)(2)(C) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting 
``, including the White House Office,'' after ``Executive agency''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 67 (Monday, April 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 18795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1110]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

Date and Time: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on April 
10, 2008, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its 
business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> March 13, 2008

B. New Business--Regulations

    <bullet> Farmer Mac Risk-Based Capital Stress Test Revisions 
(Version 3.0)--Final Rule
    <bullet> Financing for Processing or Marketing Operations--Final 
Rule

C. Reports

    <bullet> Auditors' Report on FCSBA FY 2007 Financial Statements

Closed Session \*\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \*\ Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and 
(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> OSMO Supervisory and Oversight Activities

    Dated: April 1, 2008.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 08-1110 Filed 4-3-08; 2:19 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CALLIE JEROME JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:11cv84/RS-WCS

WACHOVIA BANK,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) and

Plaintiff’s Motion For Specific Objection (Doc. 10). I have considered Plaintiff’s

objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and is

incorporated in this Order.

2. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 7) is dismissed because of

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and because of

lack of jurisdiction.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

 ORDERED on June 21, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00084-RS-WCS Document 11 Filed 06/21/11 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:11-cv-00084-RS-WCS Document 11 Filed 06/21/11 Page 2 of 2
AVID-12.31.2013-Ex 10.40






EXHIBIT 10.40




SUMMARY OF AVID TECHNOLOGY, INC.’S 
2013 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM




		
	•
	On October 28, 2013, the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Avid Technology, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted a 2013 Annual Incentive Program (the “2013 Program”). 




		
	•
	All of the Company’s executive officers and certain other officers designated by the Committee are eligible to participate in the Program. 




		
	•
	The Committee administers and has final authority on all matters relating to the 2013 Program and all decisions under the 2014 Program with respect to the Company’s executive officers, including payouts, are subject to prior approval by the Committee and are made in the Committee's sole discretion.




		
	•
	Incentive amounts, if any, will be determined and paid by March 15, 2014. In order to receive an incentive payout, if any, under the 2013 Program, a participant must be employed by the Company as of the day incentive amounts are paid unless otherwise provided in such participant’s employment agreement, offer letter or other agreement. 




		
	•
	The Committee approved three metrics for purposes of determining performance goals and payouts under the 2013 Program, each measured separately and weighted as follows: 


		
	◦
	Cost-related strategic initiatives (60% of payout) focused on achieving pro forma cost savings through savings in indirect procurement, product profitability/cost refinement and service profitability;


		
	◦
	Completion of ten non-cost-related strategic initiatives (20% of payout), with each initiative assessed independently,  with a weighting of 12.5% each; and


		
	◦
	Bookings (20% of payout).




		
	•
	Payouts under the 2013 Program are contingent on the company achieving a free cash flow threshold with free cash flow defined as operating cash flow (excluding restructuring, management change and certain one-time charges).  




		
	•
	Each participant’s target incentive opportunity (based on a percentage of base salary paid in 2013) is the same target opportunity as set forth in the participant's employment agreement or offer letter. 




		
	•
	Each of the performance objectives has a threshold, target and maximum level of payment opportunity. Upon achievement of the thresholds, participant is eligible to receive 50% of the portion of his or her target bonus relating to that metric.  Upon the achievement of the targets, each participant is eligible to receive 100% of the portion of his or her target bonus relating to that metric, up to a maximum of 125% for achievement in excess of the target results.  Results that fall between the threshold and maximum are paid out on a linear basis between 50% and 125% of the portion of a participant’s target bonus relating to each metric.  




		
	•
	For executive officers whose employment agreements provide for maximum payouts of in excess of 125% of their respective base payouts in excess of the maximum of 125% under the 2013 Program also require that the Committee assess their individual performance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week of February 20, 2007: 

A closed meeting will be held on Thursday, February 22, 2007 at 2 p.m. 

Commissioners, Counsels to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be present. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting. 

Commissioner Campos, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the closed meeting in a closed session. 

The subject matter of the closed meeting scheduled for Thursday, February 22, 2007 will be: 

Formal orders of investigation; 

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; 

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an enforcement nature; 

Other matters relating to enforcement proceeding; and 

Resolution of a litigation claim. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. 

                    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been                           ( print page 7487)                        added, deleted or postponed, please contact:                 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: February 13, 2007. 

Nancy M. Morris, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 07-726 Filed 2-13-07; 11:05 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Order entered June 12, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01543-CR

MIGUEL ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-82782-2012

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On May 9, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the reporter’s 

record had not been filed. On June 9, 2014, we received the reporter’s record. Therefore, in the 

interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the May 9, 2014 order requiring findings.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order.

/s/ DAVID EVANS

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wollemi Mining Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher
Coldicutt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of May, 2008.


/s/ Christopher Coldicutt
---------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>  

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  60  DATED                    Filed Pursuant to
AUGUST 14, 1997 TO PROSPECTUS DATED                  Rule 424(b)(5)
MARCH 17, 1997, AS SUPPLEMENTED BY                   File No. 333-16793
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENTS DATED
MARCH 27, 1997

                         CMS ENERGY CORPORATION

   General Term Notes (servicemark of J.W. Korth & Company), Series C
               Due 9 Months to 25 Years from date of issue

       Pursuant to the terms of a Distribution Agreement as supplemented
by certain letter agreements, the Company has appointed the Agents
referred to below as agents through which General Term Notes (servicemark
of J.W. Korth & Company) (the "Notes") may be offered by the Company on a
continuous basis.  Additional Agents may be designated under the
Distribution Agreement from time to time.  Except as set forth herein, the
Notes offered hereby have such terms as are described in the accompanying
Prospectus dated March 17, 1997, as supplemented by the Prospectus
Supplements dated March 27, 1997.

Aggregate Principal Amount:           $ 1,783,000.00
Original Issue Date (Settlement Date) August 19, 1997
Stated Maturity Date:                 August 15, 2004
Issue Price to Public:                100.00% of Principal Amount
Interest Rate:                        7.500% Per Annum
Interest Payment Dates:               September 15 and monthly thereafter
                                      Commencing September 15, 1997
Survivor's Option:                    [ X ] Yes      [   ] No
Optional Redemption:                  [ X ] Yes      [   ] No
Initial Redemption Date:              August 15, 1999
Redemption Price:                     Initially 101.00% of Principal
                                      Amount and 100% after the first
                                      anniversary of the Initial
                                      Redemption Date.

       Agent                          Principal Amount of Notes
                                       Solicited by Each Agent

Prudential Securities Incorporated    $  359,000.00
First of Michigan Corporation         $  165,000.00
Roney & Co.                           $  310,000.00
J.W. Korth & Company                  $  949,000.00
       Total                          $1,783,000.00

                                        Per Note
                                      Sold by Agents
                                       To Public           Total   

Issue Price:                          $    1,000.00  $ 1,783,000.00
Agent's Discount or Commission:       $        7.00  $    12,481.00
Maximum Dealer's Discount or
  Selling Concession:                 $       19.00  $    33,877.00
Proceeds to the Company:              $      974.00  $ 1,736,642.00

CUSIP Number:   12589QTN6
<PAGE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A2048. ROGER DALE WHITE v. DEBRA BURKE WHITE.

Roger Dale White filed an action seeking to modify the amount of alimony he

was ordered to pay his former wife. The trial court entered summary judgment in his

former wife’s favor, and White filed this direct appeal. This appeal, however, is

barred by res judicata.

OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2) provides that “[a]ppeals from judgments or orders in

divorce, alimony, and other domestic relations cases” must be brought by application

for discretionary appeal. See Massey v. Massey, 294 Ga. 163, 165 (2) (751 SE2d 330)

(2013). White filed an application for discretionary appeal, and it was denied on July

10, 2017. See Case No. A17D0514. Because that denial was an adjudication on the

merits, the doctrine of res judicata also bars this direct appeal. See Northwest Social

& Civic Club, Inc. v. Franklin, 276 Ga. 859, 860 (583 SE2d 858) (2003); Hook v.

Bergen, 286 Ga. App. 258, 260-261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007). Therefore, this appeal

is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

February 20, 2018

02/20/2018
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) has determined that the renewal of the Advisory Committee on Veterans Affairs is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the Administration, U.S. Small Business Administration by 15 U.S.C. 633. This determination follows consultation with the Management Secretariat, General Services Administration. 

*Name of Committee:*                     Advisory Committee on Veterans Business Affairs.                 

*Purpose and Objective:*                     The committee provides recommendations and advice regarding the Agency's financial management, including the financial reporting process, systems of internal controls, audit process and process for monitoring compliance with relevant laws and regulations.                 

*Balanced Membership Plans:*                     The committee consists of at least three (3) members including one Chairperson. Committee membership must be fairly balanced and diverse in terms of occupational backgroup and type of financial expertise.                 

*Duration:*                     Continuing.                 

*Responsible SBA Officials:*                     William Elmore, Assistant Administrator, Office of Veterans Business Development, U.S.                           ( print page 2978)                        Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.                 

Meredith Davis, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 08-141  Filed 1-15-08; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00410

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF GUARDIANSHIP OF DORO THY LUCK, AN INCAPACITAT ED PERSON

----------

FROM PROBATE COURT N O. 1 OF TARRANT COUN TY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMEN T

----------

We have considered “ Appellant’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal

. ”

Th e motion complies with rule 42.1 (a) of the rules of appellate procedure ;

therefore, we dismiss the appeal as requested by Appellant . Tex. R. App. P.

42.1 (a) ; 43.2(f).

PE R CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 DELIVERED: March 20, 2014
**Exhibit 15.3**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-13008, 333-125027 and 333-137105) pertaining to the VimpelCom 2000 Stock Option Plan and the Amended and Restated VimpelCom 2000 Stock Option Plan of our reports dated April4, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Open Joint StockCompany Vimpel-Communications included in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) of Open Joint Stock Company Vimpel-Communications for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLC 

Moscow, Russia 

May 11, 2007
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 4:11cv314-RH/GRJ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GARY RESIL,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv314-RH/GRJ

JARED MILLER et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 21. No objections have been filed. Upon 

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is DISMISSED 

without prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on March 4, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00314-RH-GRJ Document 22 Filed 03/06/12 Page 1 of 1