alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,481
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,630
<ALLOWANCES>                                       916
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,648
<PP&E>                                          27,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,266
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,842
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,972
<SALES>                                         90,681
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,681
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,798 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,255
<INCOME-TAX>                                       680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,575
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOAO MAXIMIANO DE OLIVEIRA,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv41-RH/WCS

ICE IMMIGRATION,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

This petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenges

a removal order. The petition is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation, ECF No. 4. No objections have been filed. 

The report and recommendation correctly concludes that a challenge to a

removal order is within the original jurisdiction of the appropriate court of

appeals—here the Eleventh Circuit—and is not within a district court’s

jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(5). But this does not mean that the case

should be transferred to the Eleventh Circuit. Transfer is appropriate for a case

that was pending in the district court as of May 11, 2005, the effective date of the

REAL ID Act, which vested jurisdiction of such cases in the courts of appeals. See

Case 4:11-cv-00041-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 04/22/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Pub. L. No. 109-13, § 106(c), 119 Stat. 231, 311 (2005). But a case that was filed

in a district court after that date should be dismissed, not transferred. See Chen v.

Gonzales, 435 F.3d 788, 790 (7th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (holding that when a

habeas petition challenging a removal order was not pending in the district court as

of May 11, 2005, it should not have been transferred to the court of appeals: “A

petition under § 2241 filed in a district court after that date (as this petition was)

must be dismissed; it can be neither entertained nor transferred.”). See also Utoh v.

U.S. Attorney Gen., 192 F. App’x 928, 932-33 (11th Cir. 2006) (recognizing that a

§ 2241 petition that was pending in the district court on the REAL ID Act’s

effective date was properly transferred to the circuit court). 

For these reasons, 

IT IS ORDERED:

The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The petition is dismissed without

prejudice for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 22, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case No: 4:11cv41-RH/WCS

Case 4:11-cv-00041-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 04/22/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Wollemi Mining Corp. (the "Company")
on Form  10-Q  for the  period  ended  September  30,  2009 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Zhong
Zhao,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section  13(a)or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

Date: November 16, 2009
                                          By: /s/ Zhong Zhao
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Zhong Zhao
                                              Chief Financial Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ARIEON GASQUE

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 23

- 1752

LT Case No. 2022

- DR

- 001648

DANNY KISWANI

,

Appellee

. _______________________________/

Opinion filed August 18, 2023

Non f inal Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Seminole County

, Michael J. Rudisill , Judge.

Arieon Gasque, Orlando, pro se.

Mark A. Skipper, of Law Office of

Mark A. Skipper, P

. A

. , Orlando, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Arieon Gasque appeals a pre

- final

- j udgment order entered by the trial

court denying her motion for civil contempt in the pending paternity action

between the parties. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure2 9.040(c), we treat Gasque’s appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari and

dismiss the petition for failing to esta blish the requisite irreparable harm.

DISMISSED.

EDWARDS, C.J., LAMBERT and PRATT , JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-15]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sale notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-15 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

      ( print page 455)    
Dated: December 26, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 456)          ( print page 457)          ( print page 458)          ( print page 459)          ( print page 460)          ( print page 461)          ( print page 462)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-6261 Filed 1-2-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
---

Exhibit 99.6


EXHIBIT 99.6 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm We consent to the use in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of our report dated February 17, 2017, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Richmont Mines Inc. (the Corporation) as at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, the consolidated statements of changes in equity and the consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of the Corporation as at December 31, 2016. /s/ Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton LLP1 Montreal, Canada March 28, 2017 1CPA auditor, CA, public accountancy permit No. A121855


---
EXHIBIT 32.1





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Form 10-Q of Islet Sciences, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in his capacity as an officer of the company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 14, 2012
By:
/s/ John SteelJohn SteelPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)By:
/s/ Richard EganRichard EganChief Financial Officer(principal financial and accounting officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>  

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  58  DATED                  Filed Pursuant to
AUGUST 14, 1997 TO PROSPECTUS DATED                Rule 424(b)(5)
MARCH 17, 1997, AS SUPPLEMENTED BY                 File No. 333-16793
PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENTS DATED
MARCH 27, 1997

                        CMS ENERGY CORPORATION

  General Term Notes (servicemark of J.W. Korth & Company), Series C
              Due 9 Months to 25 Years from date of issue

      Pursuant to the terms of a Distribution Agreement as supplemented
by certain letter agreements, the Company has appointed the Agents
referred to below as agents through which General Term Notes (servicemark
of J.W. Korth & Company) (the "Notes") may be offered by the Company on a
continuous basis.  Additional Agents may be designated under the
Distribution Agreement from time to time.  Except as set forth herein, the
Notes offered hereby have such terms as are described in the accompanying
Prospectus dated March 17, 1997, as supplemented by the Prospectus
Supplements dated March 27, 1997.

Aggregate Principal Amount:          $ 777,000.00
Original Issue Date (Settlement Date)August 19, 1997
Stated Maturity Date:                August 15, 2000
Issue Price to Public:               100.00% of Principal Amount
Interest Rate:                       6.625% Per Annum
Interest Payment Dates:              September 15 and monthly thereafter
                                     Commencing September 15, 1997
Survivor's Option:                   [ X ] Yes     [   ] No
Optional Redemption:                 [   ] Yes     [ X ] No

      Agent                          Principal Amount of Notes
                                      Solicited by Each Agent

Prudential Securities Incorporated   $   56,000.00
First of Michigan Corporation        $  143,000.00
Roney & Co.                          $  320,000.00
J.W. Korth & Company                 $  258,000.00
      Total                          $  777,000.00

                                       Per Note
                                     Sold by Agents
                                      To Public          Total   

Issue Price:                         $    1,000.00   $ 777,000.00
Agent's Discount or Commission:      $        5.00   $   3,885.00
Maximum Dealer's Discount or
  Selling Concession:                $        9.00   $   6,993.00
Proceeds to the Company:             $      986.00   $ 766,122.00


CUSIP Number:   12589QTL0
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of BioNeutral Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen Browand, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





March  22, 2011

/s/ Stephen BrowandName:
Stephen BrowandTitle:
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
CERTIFICATIONS
99-1

I, Robert L. Calentine, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Aspen Group Resources Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The registrants other certifying officer and I, are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the Evaluation Date); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrants other certifying officer and I, have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (and persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6.     The registrants other certifying officer and I, have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: ___, 2003

/s/ Robert L. Calentine



Robert L. Calentine

Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

VICTOR MANUEL CELORIO,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 1:11cv79/RV/GRJ

GOOGLE, INC., et al.,

Defendants. 

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated September 29, 2013 (doc. 158). The parties have been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo review of the timely filed

objection (doc. 165).

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the objection, I have determined

that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 158) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (doc. 104) is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s

Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 109) is DENIED.

3. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of defendant Google, Inc.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of October, 2013.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000201815
<NAME> INVESCO BOND FUNDS, INC.
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 4
   <NAME> TAX-FREE BOND FUND

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   2-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                        192538941
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                       191304643
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2575149
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                   73790
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                             60953
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               194014535
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                      2178731
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                            2178731
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                     192620858
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                         13199414
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                         13714659
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                        15741
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                         433503
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                     (1234298)
<NET-ASSETS>                                 191835804
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                    0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                              1675372
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                  302948
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        1372424
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                      (224714)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                    (2213390)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        (2438104)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                      1372389
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                         306314
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                     890035
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                              68476
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                       (9955106)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                          15706
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                       658217
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                           185151
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                 384657
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                         197795099
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            14.71
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                   0.10
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (0.18)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                              0.10
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              14.53
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   0.01


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. ELAM

No. 55 PC.

No. 131 (Spring Term).

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 731.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 1 April 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 1 April 1980.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Soy Energy, LLC (the
Company) for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dallas Thompson,
Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

| |                                 | 
| | ------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Dallas
 Thompson            | 
| |                                 | 
| | Dallas
 Thompson, Treasurer and | 
| | Chief
 Financial Officer        | 
| |                                 | 
| | Dated:
 September 14, 2010      | 

---