Skip directly to site content Skip directly to search


Español  Other Languages


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting People
 Search
		×
			NIOSH
			NIOSH
				All CDC
				Submit
			For a full list of topics:A-Z Index
			Advanced Search
		Advanced Search


NIOSH Radiation Dose Reconstruction Program


Section Navigation
			
			CDC Home








alert icon
            Cybersecurity Modernization Initiative
                We are taking steps to continue to modernize and secure our data, applications, and systems. We completed the first phase and restored many of the functions put on pause in May 2021. Now that the first phase is complete, work will resume at a slower pace but will speed up as new systems and applications are brought online. For more information and updates, please visit our Cybersecurity Modernization Initiative web page.
								

				Norton Co.						Print
																Related Pages
										On This Page
			Special Exposure CohortAdvisory Board and NIOSH DiscussionsProgram Evaluation Plans and Reports (PEPs and PERs)Public Comments
		
(Site Profile/Docket Number 169)
Location: Worcester, Massachusetts
Special Exposure Cohort Petition Information
The Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) is a unique category of employees established by the Act (42 CFR Part 83). Claims compensated under the SEC do not have to go through the dose reconstruction process. To qualify for compensation under the SEC, a covered employee must meet specific requirements (e.g., must have at least one of 22 “specified cancers,” and have worked for a specified time period at one of the SEC sites). Classes of employees and work sites can be considered for addition to the SEC through a NIOSH petition process. More information about the Special Exposure Cohort can be found on our Frequently Asked Questions page.
Open/Active SEC Petitions
To date, there are no open/active SEC petitions from Norton Co.
Class(es) Added to the SEC
All AWE employees who worked at Norton Company in Worcester, Massachusetts, from January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment, or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort.
**Note:** This class was established by Petition 148
All atomic weapons employees who worked in any building or area at the facility owned by the Norton Co. (or a subsequent owner) in Worcester, Massachusetts, during the period from January 1, 1958 through October 10, 1962, for a number of work days aggregating at least 250 work days, occurring either solely under this employment or in combination with work days within the parameters established for one or more other classes of employees included in the Special Exposure Cohort
**Note:** This class was established by Petition 173Classes Not Added to the SEC
All Atomic Weapons Employees who worked in any building or area at the facility owned by Norton Co. (or a subsequent owner) in Worcester, Massachusetts, from October 11, 1962, through October 31, 2009
**Note:** This class was established by Petition 173Petitions Qualified for Evaluation
Below is a list of the petitions that qualified for evaluation. Select a petition on the list to view the table for that particular petition.
Petition 148 (Jan 1, 1945 to Dec 31, 1957)
	Petition 148
Steps in Petition Process:
Petition Details:Date Received
May 28, 2009Date Qualified for Evaluation
June 1, 2009Summary of Information in Petition
**Job Titles and/or Job Duties:** All Atomic Weapons Employer employees
**Period of Employment:** January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957
**Note:** The information above is what qualified for evaluation. During our evaluation of whether dose reconstructions can adequately be completed for the above job titles and period of employment, information may cause NIOSH to change some the dates or job titles/duties. Therefore, as this petition proceeds through the SEC petition process and if an SEC class is proposed, the proposed class may not exactly match the above information.Copy of the Petition Received
May 28, 2009 [198 KB (4 pages)]
                    (January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957)Federal Register Notice Announcing that a Norton Co. SEC Petition has met the Minimum Qualifications for Review and Evaluation
June 10, 2009 [53 KB (2 pages)]
                   (January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957)SEC Petition Evaluation Report
July 7, 2009 [126 KB (27 pages)]
                    (January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957)Evaluation Report Sent to the Advisory Board
July 7, 2009
                   (January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957)Petition Discussed by the Advisory Board
The Advisory Board discussed the petition on July 28 and September 8, 2009, during its regular meetings.
**Note:** Agendas and transcripts for Board meetings will be posted on the Advisory Board and Public Meetings page as soon as they become available.Advisory Board Recommendation on SEC Petition
August 28, 2009 [30 KB (2 pages)]
                   (January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957)HHS Letters to Congress Regarding the SEC Petition
September 29, 2009 [36 KB (5 pages)]
                    (January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957)HHS Designation/Determination of Additional Members to the SEC
**Designation:**
September 29, 2009 [28 KB (4 pages)]
                   (January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957)
**Note:** A “designation” means that HHS is recommending a class be added to the SEC. A “determination” means that HHS is recommending a class **not** be added to the SEC.Federal Register Notice: Designation/Determination of a Class of Employees for Addition to the Special Exposure Cohort
**Designation:**
November 5, 2009 [83 KB (2 pages)]
                    (January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957)
**Note:** A “designation” will be published if there is a recommendation to add a class to the SEC. A “determination” will be published if there is a recommendation **not** to add a class to the SEC.Effective Date for the SEC Class
October 29, 2009
                   (January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957)
**Note:** This only applies if the class is added to the SEC.Federal Register Notice: Final Effect of Determination of a Class of Employees for Addition to the Special Exposure Cohort
November 5, 2009 [83 KB (2 pages)]
                   (January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957)
**Note:** This only applies if the class is added to the SEC.Letter to DOL Regarding the Addition of a New Class of Employees to the SEC
October 29, 2009 [19 KB (1 page)]
                    (January 1, 1945 through December 31, 1957)
**Note:** This only applies if the class is added to the SEC.Petition 173 (Jan 1, 1958 to Oct 31, 2009)
	Petition 173
Steps in Petition Process:
Petition Details:Date Received
May 17, 2010Date Qualified for Evaluation
July 22, 2010Summary of Information in Petition
**Job Titles and/or Job Duties:** All atomic weapons employees who worked in any building or area
**Period of Employment:** January 1, 1960 through December 31, 1972
**Note:** The information above is what qualified for evaluation. During our evaluation of whether dose reconstructions can adequately be completed for the above job titles and period of employment, information may cause NIOSH to change some the dates or job titles/duties. Therefore, as this petition proceeds through the SEC petition process and if an SEC class is proposed, the proposed class may not exactly match the above information.Copy of the Petition Received
May 17, 2010 [1.2 MB (31 pages)]
                    (January 1, 1960 through December 31, 1972)Federal Register Notice Announcing that a Norton Co. SEC Petition has met the Minimum Qualifications for Review and Evaluation
August 23, 2010 [49 KB (2 pages)]
                     (January 1, 1960 through December 31, 1972)SEC Petition Evaluation Report
January 26, 2011 [224 KB (44 pages)]
                   (January 1, 1958 through October 10, 1962)
Addendum August 8, 2011 [100 KB (11 pages)]
                    (October 11, 1962 through October 31, 2009)Evaluation Report Sent to the Advisory Board
February 3, 2011
                     (January 1, 1958 through October 10, 1962)
August 15, 2011 (Addendum)
                    (October 11, 1962 through October 31, 2009)Petition Discussed by the Advisory Board
The Advisory Board discussed the petition on February 24, 2011, and again on August 24, 2011, during its regular meetings.
**Note:** Agendas and transcripts for Board meetings will be posted on the Advisory Board and Public Meetings page as soon as they become available.Advisory Board Recommendation on SEC Petition
March 28, 2011 [29 KB (2 pages)]
                    (January 1, 1958 through October 10, 1962)
September 14, 2011 [27 KB (2 pages)]
                     (October 11, 1962 through October 31, 2009)HHS Letters to Congress Regarding the SEC Petition
April 29, 2011 [107 KB (10 pages)]
                     (January 1, 1958 through October 10, 1962)
October 26, 2011 [70 KB (9 pages)]
                    (October 11, 1962 through October 31, 2009)HHS Designation/Determination of Additional Members to the SEC
**Designation:**
April 29, 2011 [36 KB (5 pages)]
                     (January 1, 1958 through October 10, 1962)
**Determination:**
October 26, 2011 [33 KB (4 pages)]
                     (October 11, 1962 through October 31, 2009)
**Note:** A “designation” means that HHS is recommending a class be added to the SEC. A “determination” means that HHS is recommending a class **not** be added to the SEC.Federal Register Notice: Designation/Determination of a Class of Employees for Addition to the Special Exposure Cohort
**Designation:**
May 17, 2011 [39 KB (1 page)]
                        (January 1, 1958 through October 10, 1962)
**Determination:**
November 10, 2011 [76 KB (1 page)]
                           (October 11, 1962 through October 31, 2009)
**Note:** A “designation” will be published if there is a recommendation to add a class to the SEC. A “determination” will be published if there is a recommendation **not** to add a class to the SEC.Effective Date for the SEC Class
May 29, 2011
                     (January 1, 1958 through October 10, 1962)
**Note:** This only applies if the class is added to the SEC.Federal Register Notice: Final Effect of Designation of a Class of Employees for Addition to the Special Exposure Cohort
June 9, 2011 [45 KB (1 page)]
                    (January 1, 1958 through October 10, 1962)
**Note:** This only applies if the class is added to the SEC.Letter to DOL Regarding the Addition of a New Class of Employees to the SEC
June 6, 2011 [17 KB (1 page)]
                    (January 1, 1958 through October 10, 1962)
**Note:** This only applies if the class is added to the SEC.
SEC Petitions Not Qualifying for Evaluation
In addition to the petition listed below, two additional petitions were received but did not qualify for evaluation. One did not meet the minimum petition requirements and the class defined in the other petition was already included in the SEC.
Advisory Board and NIOSH Discussions on Norton Co.
The Norton Co. discussion papers listed below are working documents prepared by NIOSH or its contractor for use in discussions with the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health or its Working Groups or Subcommittees. Draft, preliminary, interim, and white paper documents are not final NIOSH or Advisory Board (or their technical support and review contractors) positions unless specifically marked as such. These documents represent preliminary positions taken on technical issues prepared by NIOSH or its contractor.
The discussion papers have been reviewed to identify and redact any information that is protected by the Privacy Act 5 USC §552a and have been cleared for distribution.
SC&A Presentation: Summary of Five Document Reviews Approved by the Subcommittee for Procedure Reviews [1 MB (95 pages)]
            Presentation at the April 19-20, 2023, Teleconference Meeting of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health
SC&A Presentation: Review of One Advisory Board-Selected Case Reworked for the Evaluation of Norton Dose Reconstruction Template Revisions (DCAS-PER-059, Subtask 4) [228 KB (15 pages)]
            Presentation at the May 25, 2022, Teleconference Meeting of the Subcommittee for Procedure Reviews
SC&A Presentation: Review of One Advisory Board-Selected Case Reworked for the Evaluation of Norton Dose Reconstruction Template Revisions (DCAS-PER-059, Subtask 4) [333 KB (15 pages)]
            Presentation at the February 15, 2022, Teleconference Meeting of the Subcommittee for Procedure Reviews
SC&A Draft: A Review of NIOSH’s Program Evaluation Report DCAS-PER-059, “Norton Company” [887 KB (24 pages)]
            Contract No. 211-2014-58081
            SCA-TR-2017-PR002, Rev. 0
            May 22, 2017
Draft: A Focused Review of the Norton Company SEC Petition Evaluation Report SEC-00173 Concerning the Use of ORAUT-OTIB-0070 for the Reconstruction of Doses from Residual/Post-Operational Contamination [648 KB (14 pages)]
            Contract No. 200-2009-28555
            July 2011Program Evaluation Plans (PEPs) and Program Evaluation Reports (PERs)
NIOSH is committed to applying the best available science in dose reconstructions. In keeping with this commitment, completed cases with probabilities of causation less than 50% are reviewed as relevant new information becomes available. The results of these reviews are described in a Program Evaluation Report (PER). The PER details the effect, if any, of the new information on the completed dose reconstruction. If it appears that the new information may result in an increase in dose for a completed dose reconstruction with a probability of causation of less than 50%, NIOSH is committed to working with the Department of Labor to reopen and rework the dose reconstruction, as appropriate. A Program Evaluation Plan (PEP) describes plans for evaluating specific program details or issues.
DCAS-PER-059: Norton Company [59 KB 2 pages)]
            April 24, 2015
**About this Document:** Determines the effect of the revision to dose reconstruction methods for the Norton Company, including revision to residual period contamination depletion rate, on previously completed claims.
**Summary:** All claims that had previously been completed with a probability of causation (POC) less than 50% were reviewed. This population included 54 claims. Nine of these claims had employment only prior to 1962 and were removed from further evaluation. One claim had been completed using the new template and was also removed from further evaluation. One of the remaining claims was returned to NIOSH by the Department of Labor (DOL) for a new dose estimate during the evaluation. This claim was completed with the new template and was removed from further evaluation under this PER.
The dose for the remaining 43 claims was recalculated using the template and all applicable approved dose reconstruction methods. As a result, all 43 claims resulted in a probability of causation below 45%. NIOSH will provide DOL with the list of all the claims evaluated under this PER.Public Comments on Norton Co. Documents
How to Submit Comments
Comments on Norton Co. Documents can be submitted to the NIOSH Docket Officer electronically by email at nioshdocket@cdc.gov or printed comments can be mailed to:
NIOSH Docket Office
    Robert A. Taft Laboratories, MS-C34
    1090 Tusculum Avenue
    Cincinnati, OH 45226
    Please include the Site Profile/Docket Number (169) on all comments.
Comments Received
At this time, no comments have been submitted on Norton Co. documents.
							
					
							Last Reviewed:  June 30, 2022						Source: 	National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
					Facebook
        Twitter
        LinkedIn
        Syndicate homeRadiation Dose ReconstructionAbout DCASThe Act/EEOICPADose Reconstruction (DR)plus iconDataplus iconSourcesFormats & TypesSensitive DataWork History                            Phone CallData Search and Capture EffortsMethodsProductionTechnical Documents Used in Dose ReconstructionsProgram Evaluation Reports and PlansQuality Assurance and Quality ControlSupport ContractorSoftware (IMBA)RECA ClaimsProbability of Causationplus iconCalculating PCNews & UpdatesNIOSH-IREP SoftwareSpecial Exposure Cohortplus iconSubmit a PetitionCheck Petition Statusplus iconSEC Status TableGet HelpResidual ContaminationAdvisory Boardplus iconPublic MeetingsSubcommittee and Work GroupsSEC Petition RecommendationsTechnical Support for the Review of NIOSH Dose Reconstruction ProgramReports from the Advisory Board's Technical Support ContractorTechnical Review Summaries from the Technical Support ContractorProceduresCorrespondenceWork Site InformationPublications & ProductsProgram ReviewsReports to CongressPolicies, Procedures, and GuidelinesNIOSH Public DocketRelated Program LinksContact UsHELPplus iconHelp A – ZAccessibilityAcronymsFrequently Asked Questions (FAQs)plus iconThe ActCase ConcernsClaimant CorrespondenceConflict or BiasDose ReconstructionFreedom of Information Act (FOIA)National Defense Authorization ActNIOSH-IREPProbability of CausationResidual Contamination ReportResponsibilities under Subtitle B of EEOICPA (The Act)Special Exposure CohortTechnical DocumentsWork History Phone CallGlossary Follow NIOSH Facebook
Pinterest
Twitter
YouTube
 NIOSH Homepage NIOSH A-Z
Workplace Safety & Health Topics
Publications and Products
Programs
Contact NIOSH


About CDC
					Contact Us
					800-232-4636
 Facebook Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Youtube Pinterest Snapchat
 CONTACT CDC
				Contact Us
							Call 800-232-4636
							Email Us
			ABOUT CDC
				About CDC
							Jobs
							Funding
			POLICIES
				Accessibility
							External Links
							Privacy
							Policies
							No Fear Act
							FOIA
							OIG
							Nondiscrimination
							Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			CONNECT WITH US
				Facebook
								Twitter
								Instagram
								LinkedIn
							Youtube
								Pinterest
								Snapchat
								Email
			LANGUAGES
				Español
							繁體中文
							Tiếng Việt
							한국어
							Tagalog
							Русский
							العربية
							Kreyòl Ayisyen
							Français
							Polski
							Português
							Italiano
							Deutsch
							日本語
							فارسی
							English


U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
			Accessibility
			External Links
			Privacy
			Policies
			No Fear Act
			FOIA
			Nondiscrimination
			OIG
			Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
			USA.gov


Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy Close
 Links with this icon  indicate that you are leaving the CDC website. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
				Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
				You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
				CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website. Website Disclaimers
 Cancel Continue