alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HAKAM SUELIMAN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00150-MP-WCS

WAKULLA COUNTY JAIL,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 6, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, which recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 

The Magistrate filed the Report on June 28, 2011. Plaintiff has filed no objection, and the time

to do so has passed. Upon consideration, the Court agrees with the Magistrate that the case

should be dismissed. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 6) is ACCEPTED and

incorporated herein, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

 

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of July, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00150-MP-WCS Document 7 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.2  Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification  I, Jamie Horner, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 of Pacific Edge Publishing, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e) and have:  a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions after the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  May 13, 2008 By: /s/ Jamie Horner Jamie Horner, Secretary/Treasurer, Principal Financial Officer and Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Government Accountability Office

          - 4 CFR Part 22 

# AGENCY:

Government Accountability Office. 

# ACTION:

Interim rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

On June 26, 2008, the Government Accountability Office Contract Appeals Board published an interim rule, but inadvertently omitted the effective date. This document adds an effective date to the published interim rule. 

# DATES:

The interim rule published on June 26, 2008,  at 73 FR 36257 is effective on June 26, 2008, and is applicable to all appeals filed on or after October 1, 2007. Comments must be submitted on or before August 25, 2008. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        Comments may be submitted by e-mail at                         *cab@gao.gov*                         or by facsimile at 202-512-9749. Due to delivery delays, submission by regular mail is discouraged. Comments may be sent by Federal Express (FedEx) or United Parcel Service (UPS) addressed to: James A. Spangenberg, Chairman, Government Accountability Office Contract Appeals Board, 441 G Street, NW., Room 7182, Washington, DC 20548.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        James A. Spangenberg (Chairman), David Ashen (Vice Chairman), or Sharon L. Larkin (Member), 202-512-3342,                         *cab@gao.gov*. Hearing or speech impaired individuals may contact the Board via TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-8339.                     

Dated: June 26, 2008. 

James A. Spangenberg, 

Chairman,  Government Accountability Contract Appeals Board. 

[FR Doc. 08-1400 Filed 6-26-08; 1:23 pm] 

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BOBBIE EDELEN,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

BOARD OF PRISON TERMS,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 08-55246

D.C. No. CV-07-02862-R

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges 

FILED

JAN 19 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
We certify for appeal, on our own motion, the issue of whether the 1

2005 decision of the California Board of Prison Terms to deny parole violated due

process. We decline to issue a certificate of appealability as to Edelen’s remaining

claims.

2 08-55246

California state prisoner Bobbie Edelen appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm. 

1

Edelen contends that the Board of Prison Terms’s 2005 decision to deny him

parole was not supported by “some evidence” and therefore violated his due

process rights. The state court did not unreasonably conclude that some evidence

supports the Board’s decision. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); see also Hayward v.

Marshall, 603 F.3d 546, 562-63 (9th Cir. 2010). 

AFFIRMED.
# Peace Officers' Memorial Day and Police Week, 2008

Across our Nation, law enforcement officers carry the great responsibility of protecting their fellow citizens. On Peace Officers' Memorial Day and during Police Week, we honor these brave public servants who fight crime, violence, and terrorism, and we pay homage to the heroes who have fallen in the line of duty. 

With valor and devotion, our country's law enforcement officers stand watch on the front lines and help make our communities safer and more secure. Fulfilling their duties with courage and commitment, they work tirelessly and put themselves in harm's way, exemplifying the good and decent character of America. 

As we observe Peace Officers' Memorial Day and Police Week, we pause to pay tribute to those who serve in law enforcement. On this occasion, we especially remember those who have made the ultimate sacrifice, and we pray for the families and friends they have left behind. We thank all the extraordinary American men and women who have answered the call to serve in law enforcement for their commitment to justice and to their communities. 

By a joint resolution approved October 1, 1962, as amended (76 Stat. 676), and by Public Law 103-322, as amended (36 U.S.C. 136-137), the President has been authorized and requested to designate May 15 of each year as “Peace Officers' Memorial Day” and the week in which it falls as “Police Week,” and to direct that the flag be flown at half staff on Peace Officers' Memorial Day. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim May 15, 2008, as Peace Officers' Memorial Day and May 11 through May 17, 2008, as Police Week. I call on all Americans to observe these events with appropriate ceremonies and activities. I also call on Governors of the United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, officials of the other territories subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, as well as appropriate officials of all units of government, to direct that the flag be flown at half staff on Peace Officers' Memorial Day. I further encourage all Americans to display the flag at half staff from their homes and businesses on that day. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ninth day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 08-1266

Billing code 3195-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 226 (Monday, November 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 65972]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5809]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, MLSCN HTS ASSAY.
    Date: December 14, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: St. Gregory Hotel, 2033 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20036.
    Contact Person: Yong Yao, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6149, 
MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, (301) 443-6102, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f28b8b939db29f939b9edc9c9b9adc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="add4d4ccc2edc0ccc4c183c3c4c583cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: November 16, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5809 Filed 11-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This 30thday of March, 2006.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Emory B. Lewis           
|Emory B. Lewis               
|Chief Executive Officer      
|First Georgia Community Corp.
|                             
|/s/ Elaine Kendrick          
|Elaine Kendrick              
|Chief Financial Officer      
|First Georgia Community Corp.
# C_2011096EN.01000501.xml

| 29.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 March 2011

2011/C 96/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4032 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4574 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87825 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9729 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2908 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8745 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,543 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0007 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1110 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1869 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3678 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3733 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9433 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8707 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7721 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 563,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6642 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2089 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3880 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 231,91 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2482 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,002 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,8420 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,531 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3282 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8284 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,9190 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4032

JPY

Japanese yen

114,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4574

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87825

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9729

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2908

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8745

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,543

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0007

RON

Romanian leu

4,1110

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1869

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3678

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3733

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9433

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8707

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7721

KRW

South Korean won

1 563,17

ZAR

South African rand

9,6642

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2089

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3880

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 231,91

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2482

PHP

Philippine peso

61,002

RUB

Russian rouble

39,8420

THB

Thai baht

42,531

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3282

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8284

INR

Indian rupee

62,9190

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of IVT Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period ending January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin Schwartz Chairman and
Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 By: /s/ Martin
Schwartz
 Martin
Schwartz
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
 (Principal
Accounting Officer)
 
 March 10,
 2009
Exhibit 12(a)Entergy Texas, Inc.Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges andRatios of Earnings to Fixed ChargesTwelve Months EndedDecember 31,
March 31,2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008Fixed charges, as defined:Total Interest
$76,812
$65,220
$59,882
$70,479
$85,250
$86,284Interest applicable to rentals
5,183
4,255
2,299
2,356
3,572
2,894Total fixed charges, as defined
81,995
69,475
62,181
72,835
88,822
$89,178Earnings as defined:Net Income
$12,038
$51,136
$48,916
$54,137
$58,921
$70,030Add:Provision for income taxes:Total
5,489
23,318
17,192
27,325
36,249
43,025Fixed charges as above
81,995
69,475
62,181
72,835
88,822
89,178Total earnings, as defined
$99,522
$143,929
$128,289
$154,297
$183,992
$202,233Ratio of earnings to fixed charges, as defined
1.21
2.07
2.06
2.12
2.07
2.27
April 17, 1998
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

Attention:  Division of Investment Management
	       
       Re:  Merrill Lynch Pacific Fund, Inc.
	    Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to the 
	    Registration Statement on Form N-1A
	    (Securities Act File No. 2-56978
	    Investment Company Act File No. 811-2661)
	   
Ladies and Gentlemen:

   Pursuant to Rule 497 (j) under the Securities Act of 
1933, as amended (the "1933 Act"), Merrill Lynch Pacific
Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") hereby certifies that:

   (1) the form of prospectus and statement of additional 
       information that would have been filed pursuant to 
       Rule 497 (c) under the 1933 Act would not have 
       differed from that contained in Post-Effective 
       Amendment No. 29 to the Fund's Registration Statement
       on Form N-1A, constituting the most recent amendment 
       to the Fund's Registration Statement on Form N-1A; 
       and
	
   (2) the text of Post-Effective Amendment No. 29 to the 
       Fund's Registration Statement on Form N-1A was filed 
       electronically with the Securities and Exchange 
       Commission on April 6, 1998.

				 Very truly yours,
					
		       Merrill Lynch Pacific Fund, Inc.

			By:    /s/ Robert Harris
			     _________________________
				  Robert Harris               
				    Secretary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MOISES DARIO ARIAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-70614

Agency No. A075-714-114

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 13, 2014** 

Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Moises Dario Arias, a native and citizen of Bolivia, petitions for review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § § §

1252. We review de novo constitutional claims and questions of law.

FILED

AUG 15 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Hamazaspyan v. Holder, 590 F.3d 744, 747 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and

dismiss in part the petition for review. 

The BIA correctly determined that Arias made a knowing and intelligent

waiver of his right to appeal. See United States v. Estrada-Torres, 179 F.3d 776,

781 (9th Cir. 1999) (“Because the immigration judge explained the right to appeal

to [petitioner] (with the other deportees) and individually asked him specifically if

he wanted to appeal his deportation order, his waiver of his right to appeal was

‘considered and intelligent.’”) (citation omitted), overruled on other grounds by

United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 247 F.3d 905 (9th Cir. 2001). As the appeal

waiver was effective, the BIA properly dismissed Arias’ appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. See Matter of Rodriguez-Diaz, 22 I. & N. Dec. 1320, 1322 (BIA

2000) (“By waiving appeal, an alien relinquishes the opportunity to obtain review

of the Immigration Judge’s ruling.”).

We lack jurisdiction to review Arias’ remaining unexhausted contentions. 

See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 13-70614
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5647 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5647

 To include Hungary in the list of foreign states whose nationals are 
      eligible for admission into the United States as E1 and E2 
 nonimmigrants if United States nationals are treated similarly by the 
                         Government of Hungary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2018

Mr. King of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Harris, and Mr. Ross) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To include Hungary in the list of foreign states whose nationals are 
      eligible for admission into the United States as E1 and E2 
 nonimmigrants if United States nationals are treated similarly by the 
                         Government of Hungary.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as--
            (1) the ``Hungary-United States Supporting Advanced 
        Relations Act''; or
            (2) the ``HUSSAR Act''.

SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT TRADERS AND INVESTORS.

    For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 101(a)(15)(E) of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)), Hungary 
shall be considered to be a foreign state described in such section if 
the Government of Hungary provides similar nonimmigrant status to 
nationals of the United States.
                                 <all>
```