alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Advisory Committee on Former Prisoners of War (FPOW) has scheduled a meeting for April 16-18, 2007, at the Department of Veterans Affairs Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will be held in room 630 on April 16 and room 830 on April 17-18, from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. each day. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on the administration of benefits under title 38, United States Code, for veterans who are former prisoners of war, and to make recommendations on the needs of such veterans for compensation, health care, and rehabilitation.

The agenda for April 16 will begin with an introduction of Committee members, remarks from dignitaries, a review of Committee reports, an update of activities since the last meeting, and a period for FPOW veterans and/or the public to address the Committee. On April 17, the Committee will hear reports from the Veterans Health Administration and Veterans Benefits Administration. The Committee will also hear an update on Robert E. Mitchell Center for Prisoners of War studies. On April 18, the Committee's medical and administrative work groups will meet to discuss their activities and report back to the Committee. Additionally, the Committee will review and analyze comments presented during the meeting to compile a report to be sent to the Secretary.

Members of the public may direct questions or submit written statements for review by the Committee in advance of the meeting to Mr. Bradley G. Mayes, Director, Compensation and Pension Service (21), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420. Submitted materials must be received by April 1, 2007.

Dated: February 14, 2007.

By Direction of the Secretary.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-784 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
CERTIFICATIONS

99-2





, Allan C. Thorne, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Aspen Group Resources Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I, are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I, have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (and persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and

6.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I, have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 29, 2003

/s/ Allan C. Thorne



Allan C. Thorne

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quartlery report on Form 10-Q of Soy Energy, LLC (the
Company) for the quarter ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Sand,
President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Charles
 Sand                                   
| |                                                     
| | Charles
 Sand, President and Chief Executive Officer
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                       
| |                                                     
| | Dated: March
 17, 2009                              

---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 22-13948

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

SYLVESTER JOHNSON, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Respondents-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 8:19-cv-02297-CEH-TGW

USCA11 Case: 22-13948 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 05/15/2024 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 22-13948

____________________

Before WILSON, BRASHER, and ABUDU, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Sylvester Johnson, pro se, appeals the district court’s final 

judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Upon review of 

the record and the State’s response to the jurisdictional questions,

we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal. 

Johnson’s November 17, 2022 notice of appeal is untimely 

to appeal from the district court’s July 27, 2022 final judgment. See

28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Following a limited 

remand, the district court denied Johnson’s construed motion for

relief under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(6). Johnson 

has not challenged that decision. Thus, we lack jurisdiction over 

this appeal. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300-01 

(11th Cir. 2010) (noting that the timely filing of a notice of appeal 

in a civil action is a jurisdictional requirement).

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are DENIED as MOOT. 

USCA11 Case: 22-13948 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 05/15/2024 Page: 2 of 2
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00286

- CR

D ALPHINES C HIDIEBERE

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County ( 1747260 )

July 25, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment s . It is ordered that the judgment s of the trial

court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mike Wallach

___________________ Justice Mike Wallach
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Media Sciences International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the “Report”), I, Michael W. Levin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

 

| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: September 25, 2008

 

|   | /s/ Michael W. Levin    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Michael W. Levin        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31(b)

CERTIFICATIONS

** 
I, Jay A. Lewis, certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Entergy Texas, Inc.;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

		/s/ Jay A. Lewis			

**
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JEREMY RYAN HAGAN, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-2132

LT Case Nos. 2014-CF-02973-A-O 

2014-CF-03173-A-O 

2014-CF-010624-A-O

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed November 1, 2022

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Orange County, 

Luis Fernando Calderon, Judge. 

Jeremy Ryan Hagan, Monticello, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee,

and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney

General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, EDWARDS and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5546 

To authorize the use of certain Department of Defense funds for combating 

opioid trafficking and abuse in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 18, 2018 

Mr. KNIGHT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the use of certain Department of Defense funds 

for combating opioid trafficking and abuse in the United 

States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS; SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

4 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find5 ings: 

6 (1) Over the past 15 years, the rise in opioid 

7 use in the United States has grown exponentially. 

8 (2) According to the Office of National Drug 

9 Control Policy, the number of deaths related to 

10 opioids in the United States in 2016 was 42,269. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5546 IH

1 (3) Addiction and misuse of prescription opioids 

2 continues to rise. According to the Office of National 

3 Drug Control Policy, in 2016, 11.5 million people 

4 misused prescription opioids. 

5 (4) The predominant amount of precursors for 

6 fentanyl production are illicit trafficked from China. 

7 (5) The Office of National Drug Control Policy 

8 is the lead agency for confronting the epidemic of 

9 opioid addiction and trafficking in the United 

10 States. 

11 (6) The Department of Homeland Security is 

12 the lead agency in securing United States borders 

13 from illicit trafficking. 

14 (7) The Department of Defense plays a vital 

15 supporting role in addressing the illicit nature of the 

16 opioid epidemic through intelligence analysis, edu17 cation, and assistance to other departments and 

18 agencies in dealing with this challenge. 

19 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con20 gress that— 

21 (1) the Department of Defense should provide 

22 support for interagency efforts to combat the na23 tional opioid epidemic; and 

24 (2) the role of the Department of Defense is 

25 critical to identifying transnational criminal organiVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:43 Apr 20, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5546.IH H5546

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5546 IH

1 zations that allow illicit opioids to enter the United 

2 States. 

3 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE SUPPORT FOR COM4 BATING OPIOID TRAFFICKING AND ABUSE. 

5 Of the amounts authorized to be appropriated for the 

6 Department of Defense for National Guard counterdrug 

7 programs for fiscal year 2019, $20,000,000 may be used 

8 to provide support for United States interagency efforts 

9 to combat opioid trafficking and abuse in the United 

10 States. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1232-1233]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6294]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Meeting

Agenda

    Time and Date: 9:30 a.m., Thursday, January 10, 2008.
    Place: NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, 
DC 20594.
    Status: The one item is open to the public.

[[Page 1233]]

    Matter To Be Considered:

7963 Marine Accident Report--Heeling Accident on M/V Crown Princess, 
Atlantic Ocean Off POrt Canaveral, Florida, July 18, 2006.
    News Media Contact: Telephone: (202) 314-6100.
    Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris 
Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, January 4, 2008.
    The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by 
accessing a link under ``News & Events'' on the NTSB home page at 
www.ntsb.gov.
    For Further Information Contact: Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

    Dated: December 28, 2007.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-6294 Filed 01-04-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-PM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CARRIE JEAN JEFFERSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-151-RS-CAS

FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY,

BOARD OF TRUSTEES

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31).

No objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved 

and incorporated in this Order.

2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 27) is GRANTED. 

3. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 23) is DISMISSED 

for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on May 17, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00151-RS-CAS Document 32 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RAY CHRIS MOBLEY,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv268/LAC/CJK

CAREEM HAMILTON, 

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated April 25, 2012. (Doc. 13). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation,I have determined that the

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure

to comply with an order of the court. 

Case 3:11-cv-00268-LC-CJK Document 14 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29 day of May, 2012.

th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:11cv268/LAC/CJK

Case 3:11-cv-00268-LC-CJK Document 14 Filed 05/29/12 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7544

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAMON EMANUEL ELLIOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:97-cr-00053-PJM-1; 8:16-cv-03419-PJM)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damon Emanuel Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsay Eyler Kaplan, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Damon Emanuel Elliott seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as 

successive and unauthorized. The order is not appealable unless 

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Elliott has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED