alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>				       			    	                     EXHIBIT 31.01
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Walter Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan
Stanley Managed Futures HV, L.P.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

    b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant?s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant?s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant?s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant?s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant?s internal
control over financial reporting; and


<page>
5.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant?s auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant?s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant?s ability to record, process, summarize, and
report financial information; and

   b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant?s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  November 20, 2008   By: /s/	Walter Davis
		Walter Davis
                                  	President,
	 	Demeter Management Corporation,
                                 	general partner of the registrant
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 12, 2016

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ALEXANDER K. CARNEY

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County

No. 14

- 620 Donald H. Allen

, Judge

No. W2015

- 01265

- CCA

- R3

- CD

- Filed April 29, 2016

T HOMAS T. W OODALL

, P.J., dissenting.

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the appeal should be

dismissed. However, when the issue is addressed on its merits, the convictions should be

affirmed. The trial c ourt found that Defendant was not wearing his seatbelt, which was a violation of the law, and that fact gave the trooper legal grounds to stop Defendant. By the limited issue in the certified question of law, Defendant (who presumabl y drafted the certified question) challenged only the stop and seizure of his vehicle on the ground that he was driving without wearing his seatbelt. The State could have insisted that the certified question include the issue relied upon by the majority i n order to justify the seizure of the drug evidence, b u t did not. Thus, neither the State nor this court can go beyond the precise issue presented. The appellate court is “limited to consideration of the question preserved.” State v. Day , 263 S.W.3d 891

, 900 (Tenn. 2008)

.

When crafting a certified question, both the defendant and the state would be prudent to review the Rule, craft the certified question to insure that it meets each of the requirements delineated in subsection (b)(2)(A)(i)

- (iv) of the Rule, and analyze whether the issue as stated in the judgment order is broad enough to mee t the intent of both parties. Although the burden is on the defendant/appellant to see that these prerequisites are in the final order [citation omitted], the state/ appellee would be prudent to review the certified question as well because, as it did in this case, a certified question too narrow in scope may work to the

state’s detriment.

Id . at fn 8.2

Accordingly, I would address the issue on its merits

, find that Defendant is not entitled to relief, and affirm the judgments.

___________________________________________ THOMAS T. WOODALL, PRESIDING JUDGE
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

**Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of DirectorsBPZ Energy, Inc.Houston, Texas

 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-126934 and 333-147463) and Form S-8 (No. 333-116508, 333-126388, and333-147462) of BPZ Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our report dated March12, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and theeffectiveness of BPZ Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control overfinancial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K/A. 

 
| /s/ Johnson Miller &  Co., CPA’s PC |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Midland, Texas                                    |   |   |
|                                              |   |   |
| August 29, 2008                                   |   |   |

 

----
## NO. 12

- 14

- 00115

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

JASON WAYNE BELCHER, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 115T H

JUDICIAL DISTRICT CO URT

UPSHUR COUNTY, TEXAS

OPINION Appellant, Jason Wayne Belcher, appeals his conviction of the offense of aggravated assault of a child, enhanced by a prior conviction for the same type of conduct. Appellant raises three issues on appeal. We affirm.

B ACKGROUND Appellant was accused of putting his finger inside the female sex organ of H.C., a child, on or about January 17, 2012. At trial, H.C. testified that Appellant had done this on two occasion s. In February 2014, two months before trial, Appellant’s daughter S. told her second grade teacher, Alicia Collier, that her father had been doing “sex things” with her. S. was taken to the Northeast Texas Child Advocacy Center where she was interviewed by Mary Spurlin. S. told Mary Spurlin that Appellant had anal and vaginal intercourse with her starting when she was four years of age and ending around Christmas 2013 when she was eight. S. also told Spurlin that Appellant had sexually abused her younge r sister, R., who is severely disabled and cannot communicate verbally. Immediately prior to trial, the trial court conducted a hearing out of the presence of the jury to determine if the evidence of the extraneous sexual offenses alleged to have been
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 12 (Thursday, January 17, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 3269]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-145]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


 Meeting of the Judicial Conference Advisory Committee on Rules 
of Appellate Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on 
Rules of Appellate Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure will 
hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation 
but not participation.

Dates: April 10-11, 2008.

Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Monterey Plaza Hotel, 400 Cannery Row, Monterey, CA 93940.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee 
Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, 
Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: January 11, 2008.
John K. Rabiej,
Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 08-145 Filed 1-16-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs CASE NO: 3:01cr82-005

TAVARIS ANDERSON,

Defendant.

__________________________________________________/

ORDER REDUCING SENTENCE

Defendant's sentence of confinement is hereby reduced from 211 months to 105

months. In all other respects, the original sentence imposed in the Judgment and

Commitment Order filed 4 December 2001 shall remain unchanged.

ORDERED this 21st day of May 2007.

 s/L.A. Collier 

 LACEY A. COLLIER

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:01-cr-00082-LC Document 197 Filed 05/21/07 Page 1 of 1
Miller, Diane M.

From:
Sent:
To:

Ce:
Subject:

TomFoulds2.doc

Please see attachment.

Alexandre Klementiev [aklementiev@tpchd.org]
Monday, October 29, 2001 4:31 PM
niocindocket@cdc.gov

ocas@cdc.gov

PC



gcas@cdc.gov
niocindocket@cdc.gov

October 29, 2001
Dear Sir/Madam,

Itis stated in [FR66, page 50968] that

“...a member of the Special Cohort seeking compensation for a specified cancer, is eligible for
compensation only if DOL determines that the cancer was “at least as likely as not” (a 50% or greater
probability) caused by radiation doses. ...”

To calculate the probability of causation (PC), the following formula is offered:
*) PC = 100% X RadRisk/(RadRisk + BasRisk),

where RadRisk is defined in [FR66, page 50968] as

“... risk of cancer attributable to radiation exposure”
and BasRisk is

“the baseline risk of cancer to the general population”.

Ihave the following questions relating to the definition of the terms in formula *).

1) Is the risk of cancer attributable to radiation exposure defined as

**)  RadRisk =(RR-1)/RR

where RR stands for the relative risk defined as the ratio of the incidence rate for exposed IR, to
unexposed TRunex:

*e*)  RR=IRo/TRunex

2) If the answer to 1) is YES, does the IRya-x account for the background radiation?
2a) If the answer to 1) is NO, can you give me the correct definition of RadRisk.
3) Is BasRisk is also defined as attributable risk?
4) If the answer to 3) is YES, please explain what risk the BasRisk is attributable for?
5) If the answer to 3) is NO please give the formal definition of BasRisk.

. 6) Please give me any example of calculating PC with the use of *).

7) Can you give me a reference to any publication where the concept of PC as it is used in [FR66] is
explained in details.

Thank you in advance

Alex Klementiev
Consultant
Klement@nwesthost.com

References

[FR66] Federal Register/ Vol. 66, No. 194/Friday, October 5, 2001/Proposed Rules. 42 CRF Part 81 RIN
0920-ZA01 Guidelines for determining the probability of causation under the energy employees
occupational illness compensation program act of 2000; Notice of proposed rulemaking.
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas/8 1cfrtxt.html
AGENDA 

Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 

Teleconference Meeting 

Linde Ceramics Work Group 

May 30, 2012 

2:30 p.m. Eastern 

Conference Call Number: 1-866-659-0537, Participant Pass Code: 933701 

 Welcome/Roll Call and Introductions

 Work Group Discussion

o Presentation of draft PowerPoint presentation for ABRWH meeting in June in 

Santa Fe, New Mexico

o Discussion of presentation

 Motion and Vote

 Adjourn
|   | a) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Webdigs, Inc. for the quarter ended April      30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | b) | information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Webdigs,    Inc. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| June      14, 2010 |   | /s/ Robert A. Buntz, Jr.     |
|--------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|               |   | Robert      A. Buntz, Jr.    |
|               |   | Chief      Executive Officer |
|               |   |                         |
| June      14, 2010 |   | /s/ Edward Wicker            |
|               |   | Edward      Wicker           |
|               |   | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
# C_2011003EN.01000301.xml

| 6.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 January 2011

2011/C 3/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3213 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 108,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4527 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84830 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9295 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2617 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7895 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,875 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7063 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8973 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2700 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0490 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3215 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3218 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2692 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7281 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7066 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 489,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,9071 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7457 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3980 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 862,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0565 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,896 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,4227 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,877 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2000 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1978 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,9800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3213

JPY

Japanese yen

108,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4527

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84830

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9295

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2617

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7895

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,875

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7063

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8973

RON

Romanian leu

4,2700

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0490

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3215

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3218

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2692

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7281

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7066

KRW

South Korean won

1 489,33

ZAR

South African rand

8,9071

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7457

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3980

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 862,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0565

PHP

Philippine peso

57,896

RUB

Russian rouble

40,4227

THB

Thai baht

39,877

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2000

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1978

INR

Indian rupee

59,9800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 24, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35687-35688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1386]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the

[[Page 35688]]

Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

Date and Time:  The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on July 
10, 2008, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its 
business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> June 12, 2008.

B. New Business

    <bullet> Merger of First AgCredit, FCS and its subsidiaries with 
and into Capital Farm Credit, ACA.

C. Reports

    <bullet> OE Quarterly Report.

Closed Session *
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    * Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> Update on OE Oversight Activities.

    Dated: June 19, 2008.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 08-1386 Filed 6-20-08; 12:58 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION





Each of
the undersigned officers of CFO Consultants, Inc. (the "Company") hereby
certifies that, to their knowledge, the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q/A to which this certification is attached (the "Report"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      December 21, 2010
              /s/  Joanny
      KwokJoanny
      Kwok, Chief Executive Officer
                (the
      Principal Executive Officer)




Date:
      December 21, 2010
              /s/  Ken
      TsangKen
      Tsang, Chief Financial Officer
                (the
      Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
                Officer)




This
certification is being furnished and not filed, and shall not be incorporated
into any document for any purpose, under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
the Securities Act of 1933.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen H. Liu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Arrin Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Arrin Corporation.


Date: 06/18/10                       By: /s/ Stephen H. Liu
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                     Name:  Stephen H. Liu
                                     Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 4.16.1



Ministry of the Russian Federation for Telecommunications and Information Technologies



Amendment No. 1

to License No. 23072 (registration series A 022575)

dated August 1, 2002



To amend clause 8 of the Conditions For Carrying Out Activities Under
License No. 23072 to read as follows:



8. Telematic services shall be
provided to the users of the cellular mobile communications network and of the telematic services of OJSC Vimpelcom-Region.



|                                                                                                    |  |             |  |                  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | -----------------
|First Deputy Minister of the Russian
Federation for Telecommunications and Information
Technologies |  | /Signature/ |  | B.D. Antonyuk    
|                                                                                                    |  |            
|                                                                                                    |  | /seal/      |  | December 30, 2003
|                                                                                                    |  |            
|Deputy Head of the Department of the
Organization of Licensing Activity                             |  | /Signature/ |  | B.V. Vorobyev
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00551

- CV

James Brent MANSFIELD

, Appellant

v.

Stormie Rae MANSFIELD

, Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 17710

Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

On our own motion, this court’s opinion and judgment dated October 9, 2019 are WITHDRAWN. In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgm ent of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee Stormie Rae Mansfield recover her costs of this appeal from appellant James Brent Mansfield.

SIGNED November 20, 2019.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
<page>
  EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Managed
Futures MV, L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter
Davis, President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:    /s/Walter Davis

Name:		Walter Davis
Title:	President of Demeter Management Corporation,
			the general partner of the Partnership

Date:		November 20, 2008