Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / Notices 9733 

2006) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). In our 

Preliminary Results, we determined that 

revocation of the order would likely 

result in continuation or recurrence of 

dumping with a margin of 41.69 percent 

for the all others rate, including Mittal 

Steel Kryviy Rih and Krivorozhstal Steel 

Works. We did not receive a case brief 

on behalf of either domestic or 

respondent interested parties within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(1)(i). 

Scope of the Order 

The product covered by this order is 

all steel concrete reinforcing bars sold in 

straight lengths, currently classifiable in 

the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) under item 

numbers 7214.20.00, 7228.30.8050, 

7222.11.0050, 7222.30.0000, 

7228.60.6000, 7228.20.1000, or any 

other tariff item number. Specifically 

excluded are plain rounds (i.e., non–

deformed or smooth bars) and rebar that 

has been further processed through 

bending or coating. 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes. The 

written description of the scope of the 

order is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

The Department did not receive case 

briefs from either domestic or 

respondent interested parties. Therefore, 

we have not made any changes to our 

Preliminary Results. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on rebar from 

Ukraine would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the following weighted–average 

margin: 

Manufacturers/Producers/Exporters Weighted–Average Margin 

(Percent) 

All Others Rate, including Mittal Steel Kryviy Rih and ‘‘Krivorozhstal’’ Steel Works1 .............................................. 41.69 

1As of February 1, 2006, Ukraine graduated to market economy status. See Final Results of Inquiry Into Ukraine’s Status as a Non-Market 

Economy Country, 71 FR 9520 (February 24, 2006). As a result, the Ukraine wide rate is now the All Others rate. Mittal Steel is considered part 

of the all others rate because a successor-in-interest determination has not been made. See, e.g., Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate from Belgium, Brazil, Finland, Germany, Mexico, Poland, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom and Carbon Steel Plate from Taiwan; Second Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders and Antidumping Finding; Final Results, 71 FR 11577, 11579 (March 8, 2006) (explaining that Duferco is subject to the all others rate because the Department had not yet conducted a changed circumstances review to determine the successor-in-interest to Forges de Clabecq, S.A.). 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: February 27, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–3799 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

[Docket No.990813222–0035–03] 

RIN 0625–AA55 

Allocation of Duty–Exemptions for 

Calendar Year 2007Among Watch 

Producers Located in the United States 

Virgin Islands 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce; Office of 

Insular Affairs, Department of the 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This action allocates calendar 

year 2007 duty exemptions for watch 

producers located in the Virgin Islands 

pursuant to Pub. L. 97–446, as amended 

by Pub. L. 103–465, Pub. L 106–36 and 

Pub. L. 108–429 (‘‘the Act’’). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Faye 

Robinson, (202) 482–3526. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to the Act, the Departments of the 

Interior and Commerce (the 

Departments) share responsibility for 

the allocation of duty exemptions 

among watch assembly firms in the 

United States insular possessions and 

the Northern Mariana Islands. In 

accordance with Section 303.3(a) of the 

regulations (15 CFR 303.3(a)), the total 

quantity of duty- free insular watches 

and watch movements for calendar year 

2007 is 1,866,000 units for the Virgin 

Islands (65 F.R. 8048, February 17, 

2000). 

The criteria for the calculation of the 

calendar year 2007 duty–exemption 

allocations among insular watch 

producers are set forth in Section 303.14 

of the regulations (15 CFR 303.14). 

The Departments have verified and 

adjusted the data submitted on 

application form ITA–334P by Virgin 

Islands producers and inspected their 

current operations in accordance with 

Section 303.5 of the regulations (15 CFR 

303.5). 

In calendar year 2006 the Virgin 

Islands watch assembly firms shipped 

268,430 watches and watch movements 

into the customs territory of the United 

States under the Act. The dollar amount 

of creditable corporate income taxes 

paid by Virgin Islands producers during 

calendar year 2006 plus the creditable 

wages paid by the industry during 

calendar year 2006 to residents of the 

territory was $2,071,548. 

There are no producers in Guam, 

American Samoa or the Northern 

Mariana Islands. 

The calendar year 2007 Virgin Islands 

annual allocations, based on the data 

verified by the Departments, are as 

follows: 

Name of Firm Annual Allocation 

Belair Quartz, Inc. ......... 500,000 

Hampden Watch Co., 

Inc. ............................ 200,000 

Goldex Inc. ................... 50,000 

Tropex, Inc. ................... 300,000 

The balance of the units allocated to 

the Virgin Islands is available for new 

entrants into the program or producers 

who request a supplement to their 

allocation. 

Joseph A. Spetrini, 

DAS for Policy and Negotiations, Import 

Administration, Department of Commerce. 

Nikolao Pula, 

Director, Office of Insular Affairs, Department 

of the Interior. 

[FR Doc. 07–994 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P and 4310–93–S 


erjones on PRODPC74 with NOTICES