alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

I, Steven Strasser, Chief Executive Officer of Power Efficiency Corporation, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                        
|----- |  | -----------------------
|Date: |  | March 31, 2007         
|      | 
|BY:   |  | /s/ Steven Strasser    
|      |  | Steven Strasser        
|      |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of MoneyLogix Group, Inc. for the Year Ending December 31, 2010, I, Mahmood Moshiri, Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Medical Officer and Director of MoneyLogix Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.   Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MoneyLogix Group, Inc.





Dated: April 15, 2011





MONEYLOGIX GROUP, INC.By:
/s/ Mahmood MoshiriMahmood MoshiriChief Executive Officer, President

Chief Medical Officer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 74 (Wednesday, April 16, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 20527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 08-1130]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0023; Airspace Docket No. 08-AGL-1]


Establishment of Class E Airspace; Long Prairie, MN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action confirms the effective date and makes a correction 
to the direct final rule that establishes Class E airspace at Todd 
Field, Long Prairie, MN, published in the Federal Register February 4, 
2008 (73 FR 6425) Docket No. FAA-2008-0023. In the airspace description 
of that rule, the reference to Notice to Airmen and Airport/Facility 
Directory should be removed. This action corrects that error.

DATES: Effective Dates: 0901 UTC April 10, 2008. The Director of the 
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 
Title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual 
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Mallett, Central Service Center, 
System Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest 
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76193-0530; telephone (817) 
222-4949.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    The FAA published a direct final rule with request for comments in 
the Federal Register February 4, 2008, (73 FR 6425), Docket No. FAA-
2008-0023. The sentence referencing Notice to Airmen and Airport/
Facility Directory in the airport description should not have been 
included in this action.
    The FAA uses the direct final rule procedure for non-controversial 
rules where the FAA believes that there will be no adverse public 
comment. This direct final rule advised the public that no adverse 
comments were anticipated, and that unless a written adverse comment, 
or a written notice of intent to submit an adverse comment, was 
received within the comment period, the regulation would become 
effective on April 10, 2008. No adverse comments were received; thus, 
this notice confirms that the direct final rule will become effective 
on this date.

Correction

0
In the Federal Register dated February 4, 2008, in Federal Register 
Docket No. FAA-2008-0023, on page 6426, column 3, line 15, remove the 
following:

    ``This Class E5 airspace is effective during specific dates and 
times established in advance by Notice to Airmen. The effective date 
and time will thereafter be continuously published in the Airport/
Facility Directory.''
* * * * *

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX on April 8, 2008.
Donald R. Smith,
Manager, System Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 08-1130 Filed 4-10-08; 4:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
# C_2010262EN.01000201.xml

| 29.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 September 2010

2010/C 262/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3460 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4515 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84985 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2240 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3272 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9670 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,618 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7098 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9761 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2685 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9830 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4012 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3897 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4430 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8337 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7778 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 545,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4482 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0055 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2953 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 054,77 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1570 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,260 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,1500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,162 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3049 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8842 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,7850 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3460

JPY

Japanese yen

113,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4515

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84985

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2240

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3272

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9670

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,618

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7098

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9761

RON

Romanian leu

4,2685

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9830

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4012

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3897

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4430

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8337

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7778

KRW

South Korean won

1 545,00

ZAR

South African rand

9,4482

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0055

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2953

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 054,77

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1570

PHP

Philippine peso

59,260

RUB

Russian rouble

41,1500

THB

Thai baht

41,162

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3049

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8842

INR

Indian rupee

60,7850

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Task 

Number 

Initial 

Review Start 

Initial 

Review 

Complete Days 

Testing 

Start 

Testing 

Complete Days 

QA 

Review 

Start 

QA 

Review 

Complete Days 

Final 

Review 

Start 

Final 

Review 

Complete Days 

Letter 

Mailed Days Status 

26752 8/28/2023 9/15/2023 18 12/27/2023 1/12/2024 2/2/2024 21 2/5/2024 

26762 9/7/2023 9/18/2023 11 1/19/2024 1/25/2024 6 1/26/2024 1/30/2024 4 1/30/2024 0 Granted 

26798 10/10/2023 10/17/2023 7 

26841 11/9/2023 11/21/2023 12 

26845 11/17/2023 11/21/2023 4 

26930 12/21/2023 1/2/2024 12 

Data current as of: 2/12/2024 7:50 AM ET 

Total Number of Records: 6 

Revised: 9 March 2018 

Note: Blank dates in Testing columns may indicate that testing is not required or was performed under a prior associated project. 

Page 1 of 1
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 4278

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DAMARLO JAMON PERRY , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. William L. Osteen, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 1:15

- cr - 00389

- WO

- 1 )

Submitted : August 15, 2017 Decided: August 17, 2017

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Mark Everette Edwards, EDWARDS & TRENKLE, PLLC, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant. Sandra J

. Hairston, Acting United States Attorney, Robert A.J. Lang, Assistant United States Attorney, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Damarlo Jamon Perry appeals the sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) (1), 924(a) (2) (2012)

. On appeal, Perry challenges the application of the base offense level in U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) (2015), arguing that his predicate conviction for North Carolina conspiracy to commit armed robbery no longe r qualifies as crime of violence following Johnson v. United States , 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). We affirm.
R ecent decision s by the Supreme Court and this court foreclose Perry’s argument

. See Beckles v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 886, 892 (2017) (holding that Sentencing Guidelines, including residual clause that § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A) cross

- references , “are not subject to a vagueness challenge under the Due Process Clause” ); United States v. Burns

Johnson , __ F.3d __, __, 2017 WL 3027872 (4th Cir. July 18, 2017) (holding that North Carolina conviction for robbery with dangerous weapon categorically qualifies as violent felony under Armed Career Criminal Act’s force clause ); United States v. Mack , 855 F.3d 581, 585 (4th Cir. 2017) (concluding that conspiracies and attempts to commit enumerated crime qualify as crimes of violence)

. W e therefore reject Perry’s argument that his conviction for North Carolina conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous
weapon is not a crime of violence under the force clause set for th in USSG § 4B1.2(a)(1).3 Accordingly, we affirm the district c ourt’ s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional pr ocess.

AFFIRMED
NUMBER 13-21-00115-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

ARTHUR KELVIN LOVELL, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 183rd District Court

of Harris County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on March 25, 2022, following appellant’s 

motion requesting appointment of new counsel. In our order of abatement, the trial court 

was instructed to determine whether appellant is entitled to newly appointed counsel after 

his current appointed counsel filed an Anders brief in this matter. Pursuant to our order, 

the trial court held a hearing and filed a reporter’s record and a supplemental clerk’s 
2

record containing the trial court’s findings of fact. Accordingly, this case is hereby 

reinstated.

Upon review of the supplemental reporter’s record and clerk’s record in this matter, 

appellant was present remotely from the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice for his hearing, however, before the trial court called his case, appellant 

voluntarily signed a document indicating he did not wish to attend the hearing. According 

to the testimony of Andreya Bagley, the law librarian where appellant was being held, 

appellant indicated he “was hungry” and became impatient, causing him to sign his refusal 

to participate. After appellant failed to appear before the trial court, the trial court 

determined that appellant “has abandoned this appeal and new counsel is not being 

appointed in his case.” Upon our review of the documents on file, we are of the opinion 

that appellant’s motion to appoint new counsel should be denied. 

In a separate motion, appellant requested a second extension of time to file his pro 

se response. We hereby grant appellant’s second motion for extension of time and order 

appellant to file his pro se response, if any, no later than Monday, August 8, 2022. 

PER CURIAM 

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

23rd day of June, 2022.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

THEODORE BROWN,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-122/RS-EMT

PAIGE AUGUSTINE,

Respondent.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) and 

Petitioners’ objections (Doc. 20). I have considered the objections de novo. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated 

by reference in this Order. 

2. Petitioner’s motion to amend petition (Doc. 18) is GRANTED. 

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Doc. 1) 

is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. 

ORDERED on May 15, 2012.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00122-RS-EMT Document 21 Filed 05/15/12 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Risk Management &
Investigative Solutions (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kyle Edwards, Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
      Kyle EdwardsKyle
      EdwardsPrincipal
      Executive OfficerDecember
      3, 2008
# C_2011209EN.01001601.xml

| 15.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/16

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6253 — Talis International Holding/Raphael Valves Industries)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 209/08

On 12 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6253. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6253. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CertificatePursuant to

18U.S.C. Section 1350

asAdopted Pursuant to

Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Access Anytime Bancorp, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”), I, Ken Huey, Jr., ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  February 26, 2004 | /s/  Ken Huey, Jr. |
|-------------------------------|--------------------|
|                          |               | Ken Huey, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, |
|                          |               | *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 2 (Thursday, January 3, 2008)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 411-412]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6289]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 061109296-7009-02]
RIN 0648-XE43

Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Bluefish 
Fishery; Quota Transfer

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Temporary rule; inseason quota transfer.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the State of Florida is transferring 
commercial bluefish quota to the State of New York from its 2007 quota. 
By this action, NMFS adjusts the quotas and announces the revised 
commercial quota for each state involved.

DATES: Effective December 28, 2007 through December 31, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Bryant, Fishery Management 
Specialist, (978) 281-9244, fax (978) 281-9135.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations governing the Atlantic bluefish 
fishery are found at 50 CFR part 648. The regulations require annual 
specification of a commercial quota that is apportioned among the 
coastal states from Florida through Maine. The process to set the 
annual commercial quota and the percent allocated to each state is 
described in Sec.  648.160.
    Two or more states, under mutual agreement and with the concurrence 
of the Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), 
can transfer or combine bluefish commercial quota under Sec.  
648.160(f). The Regional Administrator is required to consider the 
criteria set forth in Sec.  648.160(f)(1) in the evaluation of requests 
for quota transfers or combinations.
    Florida has agreed to transfer 100,000 lb (45,359 kg) of its 2007 
commercial quota to New York. The Regional Administrator has determined 
that the criteria set forth in Sec.  648.160(f)(1) have been met. The 
revised bluefish quotas for calendar year 2007 are: New York, 1,334,278 
lb (605,218 kg); and Florida, 453,488 lb (205,699 kg).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR part 648 and is exempt from 
review under Executive Order 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

[[Page 412]]

    Dated: December 28, 2007.
Alan D. Risenhoover
Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. 07-6289 Filed 12-28-07; 2:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
```
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 ***

 

I, Mercer Cauley, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Tryon Alpha, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Tryon Alpha, Inc.

 	 	 

Date: August 17, 2011	

 

By:*	/s/ Mercer Cauley*

Mercer Cauley, President

Principal Executive Officer and Principal FinancialOfficer

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.