alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SMG Indium Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Richard T. Morena, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: June 20, 2011

/s/ Richard T. MorenaName:
Richard T. MorenaTitle:
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
NIOSH CENTER FOR MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY

STRATEGIC PLAN HIGHLIGHTS, 2020–2029

STRATEGY 1

Strengthen understanding of how 

risk factors contribute to work-related 

motor vehicle crashes and injuries, 

and communicate this information to 

employers, workers, and others.

STRATEGY 3

Evaluate the effectiveness of motor 

vehicle safety management programs 

and practices and promote their 

adoption.

STRATEGY 2

Develop and evaluate the 

effectiveness of engineering and 

technology-based interventions to 

prevent work-related motor vehicle 

crashes and injuries, and advance 

adoption of these interventions.

INDUSTRY SECTORS

The plan identifies needed research for four priority 

industry sectors and target actions for stakeholders. 

Its purpose is to guide NIOSH-funded research and 

encourage collaboration between the Center for 

Motor Vehicle Safety and external partners.

Oil and Gas Extraction Public Safety Transportation, 

Warehousing, and 

Utilities

Wholesale and 

Retail Trade

ACCESS THE NIOSH CMVS STRATEGIC PLAN, 2020-2029

SCAN HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION

www.cdc.gov/niosh/motorvehicle/ncmvs/research

MAY 2020
Exhibit 10.19


 


Summary
Translation of Maximum Mortgage Contract


 


Parties:


 


Zhejiang Tantech Energy Technology
Co. Ltd. (“Mortgagor”; as to loan agreements, “Borrower”)


 


Shanghai Pudong Development
Bank Co. Ltd. Lishui Branch (“Mortgagee”)


 


Effective Date:


 


June 25, 2012


 


Guarantee Method:


 


Mortgagor has granted Mortgage
a first priority mortgage to the collateral property.


 


Insurance:


 


Mortgagor is required, according
to the requirement of the mortgagee, to purchase specified insurance policy for the collateral property from the insurance company
specified by the Mortgagee within five days after the signature date of this agreement, and list the mortgagee as the beneficiary
or the insured.


 


Guaranteed Debt:


 


All the debts existing as of
June 25, 2012 or arising between June 25, 2012 and 2015 in connection with financing services. The amount of debt covered by the
mortgage shall be no more than RMB 62,370,000.


 


Description of Property:


 


The collateral property is a
32,776.34 square meters building in Lishui city, owned by Zhejiang Tantech Energy Technology Co. Ltd. and used for industry and
dorms. Stated value is RMB 62,370,000.


 






    	1
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth Deane, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for Isonics Corporation (the “Registrant”) for the year ended April 30, 2007;

2.                 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a)            Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b)           intentionally omitted per SEC Rel. 33-8238;

(c)            Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d)           Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 The Registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(a)                   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)                  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| July 30, 2007            |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|  /s/ Kenneth Deane  |   |
| Kenneth Deane            |
| Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

,

Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 7 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk August 7 , 2020

158663 (11 9 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 158663

v COA: 336058

Macomb CC: 2015

- 002617

- FC

TROY ANTONIO BROWN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the third motion of defendant

- appellant to extend the

time for filing his supplemental reply is GRANTED

. The reply will be accepted as timely

filed if submitted on or before August 10 , 2020

.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

                            CRAGAR Industries, Inc.
                   SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

PRIMARY LOSS PER COMMON SHARE                                     YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                 --------------------------
                                                                    1996           1995
                                                                    ----           ----

<S>                                                              <C>             <C>
Net loss                                                         $(1,128,844)    $ (693,756)
                                                                 ===========     ==========
Weighted average number of common shares equivalent:
  Weighted average common shares outstanding(1)                      979,668        910,830

    Common equivalent shares using the Treasury Stock Method(2)      176,019        247,370
                                                                 -----------     ----------
Average common shares outstanding                                  1,155,687      1,158,200
                                                                 ===========     ==========
Net loss per common share and common
  equivalent share                                               $     (0.98)    $    (0.60)
                                                                 ===========     ==========
</TABLE>

(1) Gives effect to the weighted average number of actual common shares
    outstanding during each period presented.

(2) Gives effect to the exercise of Class A, Class B and Class C Warrants,
    exercise of the Non-Employee Director Options, and exercise of the stock
    option and restricted stock plan options using the treasury stock method.
Luke v. Fireco, LLC, No. 1244-12-14 Cncv (Toor, J., May 12, 2015).

[The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy 

of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.]

VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT

CHITTENDEN UNIT

CIVIL DIVISION

│

VICTORIA LUKE, et al., │

 Plaintiffs │

│

 v. │ Docket No. 1244-12-14 Cncv

│

│

FIRECO, LLC, et al., │

 Defendants │

│

RULING ON MOTION TO COMPEL

This is an employment discrimination case involving allegations of sexual harassment, 

race discrimination, and wrongful termination. Plaintiffs seek financial discovery related to their 

claims for punitive damages; Defendants object.

Plaintiffs’ position is that because their complaint seeks punitive damages, they are 

entitled to discovery at the get-go. The problem with this approach is that a plaintiff could make 

an entirely frivolous claim for punitive damages and then be entitled to sensitive financial 

information from a defendant. The court concludes that the more equitable approach is to allow a 

defendant to move for summary judgment, at least on the punitive damages claim, before such 

discovery is mandated. Thus, other discovery can be completed and a dispositive motion filed 

before a defendant is required to disclose its financials. The court is not, however, inclined to 

delay discovery until after the initial phase of trial as some courts appear to have done (although 

it might consider bifurcating the order of trial so that the jury would address the merits first and 

damages immediately thereafter). If defendant chooses not to seek summary judgment on this 

issue by the September 7 motion deadline, the discovery may proceed. 
2

Order

The motion to compel is denied. The motion may be renewed at a later date if necessary.

Dated at Burlington this 12th day of May, 2015.

_____________________________

Helen M. Toor

Superior Court Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5379 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5379

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
update the Biotechnology and Agricultural Trade Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2018

 Mr. Dunn (for himself and Mr. Panetta) introduced the following bill; 
           which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
update the Biotechnology and Agricultural Trade Program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Growing American Food Exports Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. BIOTECHNOLOGY AND AGRICULTURAL TRADE PROGRAM.

    Section 1543A of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act 
of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5679) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 1543A. BIOTECHNOLOGY AND AGRICULTURAL TRADE PROGRAM.

    ``(a) Establishment.--There is established in the Department of 
Agriculture a program to be known as the `Biotechnology and 
Agricultural Trade Program'.
    ``(b) Purpose.--The purpose of the program established under this 
section shall be to remove, resolve, or mitigate significant regulatory 
nontariff barriers to the export of United States agricultural 
commodities into foreign markets through policy advocacy and targeted 
projects that address--
            ``(1) issues relating to United States agricultural 
        commodities produced with the use of new biotechnology or 
        agricultural production technologies;
            ``(2) advocacy for science-based regulation in foreign 
        markets of new biotechnology or agricultural production 
        technologies; or
            ``(3) quick-response intervention regarding non-tariff 
        barriers to United States exports produced through new 
        biotechnology or agricultural production technologies.
    ``(c) Eligible Programs.--Depending on need, as determined by the 
Secretary, activities authorized under this section may be carried out 
through--
            ``(1) this section;
            ``(2) the emerging markets program under section 1542; or
            ``(3) the Cochran Fellowship Program under section 1543.
    ``(d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2019 through 2023.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Robert
Papiri, President, Secretary and Treasurer of Narayan Capital Corp. (the
“Company”), hereby certify to my knowledge that:





(1)
            
            The
      Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
      2008  (the “Form 10-Q”)fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
            
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial conditionand
      results of operations of the Company.








NARAYAN
CAPITAL
CORP.                                           /s/ Robert
Papiri


(Registrant)                                                                          
Robert Papiri


President, Secretary and
Treasurer


(Principal Accounting
Officer)





Dated:                      August
13, 2008
|   | 1. | Amendment      No.2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended      December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m      or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| BY:    | /s/      John Lackland             |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   | John      Lackland                 |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer       |
|   | (principal      financial officer) |

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED N ATAVIS BAYNARD , A ppellant , v. Case No. 5D 22 - 2573 LT Case No s. 2020 - CF
- 001378 2016 - CF
- 00 0675 S TATE OF FLORIDA , A ppellee

.

_

_______________________________/ D ecision filed February 17, 2023 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Putnam County , Howard O. McGillin, Jr. , Judge. Natavis Baynard, Lake Butler, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.
P ER CURIAM. A FFIRMED.
MAKAR and BOATWRIGHT , JJ., concur. EDWARDS, J ., concur s s pecially, with o pinion.2 C ase No. 5D 22 - 2573 LT Case No s . 2016 - CF
- 000675, 2020 - CF
- 001378 ED WARDS, J., specially concurring

. I note that a ffirming the order denying Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3. 80 0(a) motion will not prevent Appellant from pursuing any other post - conviction relief if he can do so in good faith.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WELLS FARGO BANK NA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:11-cv-127-MP-GRJ

BBMJ LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

 Pending before the Court are: (1) Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct

Mediation To Allow For Personal Appearance of Defendant Keith Brooking (Doc. 110),

and (2) Notice of Availability For The Personal Appearance of Defendant, Keith

Brooking at Settlement Conference. (Doc. 111.)

Defendant advises that he is currently on the roster of the Denver Broncos

professional football team. Due to Defendant’s participation with the Denver Broncos’

training camp and regular football season practice schedule he is unable to personally

travel to Gainesville, Florida form Colorado to attend mediation until October 19, 2012,

during a bye-week in the Broncos’ football schedule. At the recent telephone

conference held by the Court the undersigned advised the parties that the personal

attendance of Mr. Brooking was essential to the conduct of the settlement conference

and therefore his participation by videoconference would not be an available option.

Defendant says that none of the parties object and all of the parties are available to

attend the settlement conference on October 19, 2012.

Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

Case 1:11-cv-00127-GRJ Document 112 Filed 08/29/12 Page 1 of 2
1. The Motion for Extension of Time to Conduct Mediation To Allow For

Personal Appearance of Defendant Keith Brooking (Doc. 110) is GRANTED.

2. The settlement conference is rescheduled before the undersigned on

October 19, 2012 at 10:00 a.m.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29 day of August, 2012 th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

2

Case 1:11-cv-00127-GRJ Document 112 Filed 08/29/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TERRY L ROBINSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-99-RH-GRJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

__________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 8, an amended pro se petition for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has been granted leave to

proceed as a pauper, and has filed sufficient copies of the Petition for service.

Pursuant to § 2243, the United States Attorney will be required to file an answer

or other appropriate response. Petitioner shall be afforded an opportunity to file a reply. 

Upon receipt and review of the Respondent’s response, any exhibits, and Petitioner’s

reply, the Court will determine whether an evidentiary hearing is warranted. See Rule

8, Habeas Rules. If the Court determines that an evidentiary hearing is not warranted

under Rule 8 and the record is sufficient to resolve the petition, then the Court will

recommend disposition of the Petition on the basis of the record presented. See id. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Clerk shall furnish by certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the

Amended Petition, Doc. 8, and this order to the Respondent, the United States

Attorney General, and the United States Attorney for this district, who shall file an

answer on or before November 12, 2011. 

Case 5:11-cv-00099-MW-GRJ Document 12 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2.. Petitioner shall have until December 12, 2011, to file a reply, if desired.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13 day of September 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 5:11-cv-99-RH-GRJ

Case 5:11-cv-00099-MW-GRJ Document 12 Filed 09/13/11 Page 2 of 2
Styles de poils faciaux et masques respiratoires filtrants

Destiné aux professionnels qui portent des masques respiratoires hermétiques

Surface d’étanchéité du 

masque respiratoire

RASÉ DE PRÈS BARBE DE 

QUELQUES JOURS

BARBE DE 

PLUSIEURS JOURS

BARBE 

COMPLÈTE

FOURCHETTE 

FRANÇAISE

QUEUE DE 

CANARD

COLLIER DE 

BARBE

BARBE EN 

CERCLE

CÔTELETTES DE 

MOUTON

EN GUIDON BARBICHE ANCRE BALBO

Attention! Les poils de menton peuvent facilement dépasser le joint du masque

VERDI BARBICHE ÉTENDUE GARIBALDI VAN DYKE IMPÉRIALE

FAVORIS BANDHOLZ HULIHEE ABAT-JOUR ZAPPA MORSE PINCEAU CHEVRON ZORRO

EN TRAIT DE CRAYON BARBE 

MOUCHE

FER À CHEVAL ANTAGONISTE

Attention à ne pas dépasser le joint du masque

SPAGHETTI 

MOUILLÉ

ANGLAISE DALI

*

Si votre masque respiratoire dispose d’une soupape d’expiration, certains de ces styles peuvent empêcher la soupape de fonctionner correctement si des poils de visages entrent en contact avec elle.

†

Cette image peut ne pas comprendre tous les types de styles de poils faciaux. Pour tous les styles, les poils ne doivent pas passer sous la surface d’étanchéité du masque respiratoire.

Source: Normes de l’OSHA relatives aux protections respiratoires

https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=standards&p_id=12716

Pour en savoir plus: Page Web de source fiable sur les masques respiratoires du NIOSH.

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/disp_part/respsource3fittest.html

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

2023
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of 5to1 Holding Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Heckman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 10, 2011





/s/ James HeckmanJames Heckman

Chief Executive Officer,

(Principal Executive Officer)