alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSEPH RAMANDA JONES,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11cv78/RS-EMT

RANDY KENT and MARK MALLORY,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11). 

Plaintiff has not filed objections. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order. 

2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), this case is dismissed without

prejudice because of failure to state a claim.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on June 22, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00078-RS-EMT Document 14 Filed 06/22/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ALBENO SCELETZ CARMICHAEL,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv87/RV/MD

JUDGE MICHAEL G. ALLEN,

Defendant.

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated February 24, 2011. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii) and due to this court’s lack of jurisdiction to review orders

entered in the state court proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of March, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:01-cr-00073-RV   Document 51   Filed 11/29/06   Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. THOMPSON

No. 268 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 629.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
**EXHIBIT 10.43**

**BASE SALARIES FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS**

As of March 1, 2005, the CompensationCommittee of the Board of Directors of EFJ, Inc. has not modified the salaries of any named Executive Officer. The annual base salaries of Michael E. Jalbert, Jana Ahlfinger Bell, R. Michael B. Gamble, Andrew Massey, Ellen O’Hara, and MassoudSafavi, each of whom were EFJ, Inc. executive officers during all or part of 2005, at the same levels as the 2004 annual base salaries, or $370,000, $210,000, $135,000, $134,000, 260,000, and $218,360, respectively.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Indian Gaming Commission

# AGENCY:

National Indian Gaming Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

      ( print page 73045)    

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to 25 CFR 514.1(a)(3), that the National Indian Gaming Commission has adopted final annual fee rates of 0.00% for tier 1 and 0.059% (.00059) for tier 2 for calendar year 2007.  These rates shall apply to all assessable gross revenues from each gaming operation under the jurisdiction of the Commission.  If a tribe has a certificate of self-regulation under 25 CFR part 518, the final fee rate on class II revenues for calendar year 2007 shall be one-half of the annual fee rate, which is 0.0295% (.000295).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kwame Mainoo, National Indian Gaming Commission, 1441 L Street, NW., Suite 9100, Washington, DC 20005; telephone (202) 632-7003; fax (202) 632-7066 (these are not toll-free numbers).

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) established the National Indian Gaming Commission which is charged with, among other things, regulating gaming on Indian lands. 

The regulations of the Commission (25 CFR part 514), as amended, provide for a system of fee assessment and payment that is self-administered by gaming operations.  Pursuant to those regulations, the Commission is required to adopt and communicate assessment rates, the gaming operations are required to apply those rates to their revenues, compute the fees to be paid, report the revenues, and remit the fees to the Commission on a quarterly basis.

The regulations of the Commission and the final rate being adopted today are effective for calendar year 2007.  Therefore, all gaming operations within the jurisdiction of the Commission are required to self administer the provisions of these regulations, and report and pay any fees that are due to the Commission by December 31, 2007.

Dated: December 18, 2007.

Philip N. Hogen,

Chairman, National Indian Gaming Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-6182 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7565-01-M
Case 3:11-cr-00048-MCR-EMT   Document 36   Filed 11/18/11   Page 1 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00048-MCR-EMT   Document 36   Filed 11/18/11   Page 2 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00048-MCR-EMT   Document 36   Filed 11/18/11   Page 3 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00048-MCR-EMT   Document 36   Filed 11/18/11   Page 4 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00048-MCR-EMT   Document 36   Filed 11/18/11   Page 5 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00048-MCR-EMT   Document 36   Filed 11/18/11   Page 6 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00048-MCR-EMT   Document 36   Filed 11/18/11   Page 7 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00048-MCR-EMT   Document 36   Filed 11/18/11   Page 8 of 8
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 1, 2015

d0325 

# Order

Clerk April 1, 2015

150055

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150055

COA: 315031

Wayne CC: 12

- 009043

- FC

XAVIER ERIC SMITH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 29, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because w e are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Partition Design, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Korsinsky, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  PARTITION DESIGN, INC.Date:  August 7, 2008By:/s/  Michael KorsinskyMichael KorsinskyPresident and Chief ExecutiveOfficer & Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 216TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF GILLESPIE COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on August 19, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Marisela G. Salas, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Martin Suarez and as Next Friend of

Keyla Marizel Salas Suares, Minor, Appellant

V.

Allen Keller Co. I, L.L.C. d/b/a Allen Keller Co., Appellee

No. 04-14-00622-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 13410

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the

trial court is AFFIRMED. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant

Marisela G. Salas, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Martin

Suarez and as Next Friend of Keyla Marizel Salas Suarez, Minor.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on October 28, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00622-CV

Marisela G. Salas, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Martin Suarez and as

Next Friend of Keyla Marizel Salas Suares, Minor

v.

Allen Keller Co. I, L.L.C. d/b/a Allen Keller Co.

(NO. 13410 IN 216TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF GILLESPIE COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51

FEE

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

INDIGENT

FILING

$10.00

$250.00

$50.00

$20.00

$25.00

$100.00

E-PAID

PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

ELLEN TAGTMEIER

MICHAEL G. SAWICKI

MICHAEL SAWICKI

MICHAEL SAWICKI

MICHAEL SAWICKI

MICHAEL SAWICKI

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this October 28, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SolarWinds, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Kevin B. Thompson, as
Principal Executive Officer of SolarWinds, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SolarWinds, Inc.



|                       |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 29, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kevin B. Thompson                
|                       |  |     |  | Kevin B. Thompson                    
|                       |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SolarWinds, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Michael J. Berry, as
Principal Financial Officer of SolarWinds, Inc., hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SolarWinds, Inc.



|                       |  |     |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 29, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael J. Berry                             
|                       |  |     |  | Michael J. Berry                                 
|                       |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                       |  |     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
<page>
	  				        EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Christian Angstadt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan
Stanley Managed Futures HV, L.P.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this  report is being
prepared;

    c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant?s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant?s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant?s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant?s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant?s internal control over
financial reporting; and


<page>
5.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant?s auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant?s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant?s ability to record, process, summarize, and
report financial information; and

    b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant?s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  August 13, 2009     By: /s/Christian Angstadt
                                  Christian Angstadt
                                  Chief Financial Officer,
                                  Demeter Management LLC,
                                  general partner of the registrant
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6281]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Meeting

ACTION:  Amendment of Meeting Announcement, dated December 26, 2007.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the meeting date for the 19th meeting of 
the American Health Information Community in accordance with the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.) The 
American Health Information Community will advise the Secretary and 
recommend specific actions to achieve a common interoperability 
framework for health information technology (IT).
    Revised Meeting Date: January 22, 2008, from 8:30 to 12:00 p.m. 
(previously scheduled on January 15, 2008).

ADDRESSES: Hubert H. Humphrey building (200 Independence Avenue, SW., 
Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 800.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will include presentations by 
the Population Health/Clinical Care Connections Workgroup and 
Electronic Health Records Workgroup on Recommendations to the 
Community; an update on the Health IT Physician Adoption Survey 
results; an update on the Healthcare Information Technology Standards 
Panel (HITSP) Interoperability Specifications; and an update on the 
findings from the Enhancing Data Quality in EHRs Report.
    For further information, visit http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic.html. A Web cast of the Community meeting will be available on the 
NIH Web site at: http://www.videocast.nih.gov/.
    If you have special needs for the meeting, please contact (202) 
690-7151.

    Dated: December 27, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-6281 Filed 1-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-45-M
**EXHIBIT21**

 

**Subsidiariesof the Registrant**

 

 
| **Subsidiary**                                         |   | **Jurisdiction of  Organization** |   | **Names Under Which  Subsidiary Does Business** |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |   |                              |   |                                            |
| FirstBank (formerly named First Savings Bank,  F.S.B.) |   | Federal Savings and Loan Charter  |   | FirstBank                                       |
|                                                   |   |                              |   |                                            |
| First Equity Development Corporation                   |   | New Mexico                        |   | Inactive                                        |

 

----
# C_2010302EN.01000501.xml

| 9.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/5

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5913 — CEZ/EPH/MIBRAG Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 302/05

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 25 October 2010, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration between CEZ, EPH and MIBRAG Group. On 3 November 2010, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ELVIS PRESLEY

ENTERPRISES, INC. et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv50-RH/WCS

BUD GLASS PRODUCTIONS et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Based on the order noting entry of consent order ( ECF No. 32), the consent

order (ECF No. 33), and the stipulation of dismissal (ECF No. 34),

 IT IS ORDERED:

The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The parties are ordered to comply

with the consent order. The court reserves jurisdiction to enforce the consent

order. All claims in this case are dismissed with prejudice.” The clerk must close

the file.

SO ORDERED on July 11, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:11-cv-00050-RH-WCS Document 36 Filed 07/11/11 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>  0001024125
<NAME> CRAGAR INDUSTRIES
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         863,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,590,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,475
<INVENTORY>                                  6,302,612
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,766,517
<PP&E>                                       1,590,444
<DEPRECIATION>                                 764,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,755,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,149,670
<BONDS>                                      3,069,251
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,103
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,776,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,755,144
<SALES>                                     18,625,497
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,625,497
<CGS>                                       17,067,698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,317,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (259,842)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,027,135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,459,333)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,459,333)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                330,489
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,128,844)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.98)


</TABLE>