T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J EFFREY FO RTER, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. R A N D Y G E E R ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 12- 35470 D . C . N o . 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 6 0 6 5 - MO ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

O r e gon M i c ha e l W . M os m a n, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d Jul y24, 2013 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , C L IF T O N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. O re g o n state p riso n erJe ff re y F o rterap p ea ls p ro se fr o m th e d istrict co u rt’s ju d g m e n t in h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g th a t d e f e n d a n ts v io la te dh is const i tut i on alri gh t s and the R el i gi ou s L and U se and Inst i tut i on al i ze d P er sons A ct ( “R L U I P A ” ) in c o n n e c tio n w ith C h r is tian I d e n titym a te r ia ls th a t d e f e n d a n ts 

# FI LED AU G 02 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 35470 2 deem ed i nfl am m at ory. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 1 29 1. W e r evi ew d e n o v o th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s s u m m a ryju d g m e n t, J ones v . B lanas , 393 F . 3d 918, 926 ( 9th C i r . 2004) , a nd de t e rm i na t i on tha tapr i s one rf a i l e d t o e xhaus ta dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e d ie s u n d e rth e P r is o n L itig a tio n R e f o rm A c t, W

y at t v . T e rhune , 315 F . 3d 1 1 0 8 , 1 1 1 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d istrict co u rt p ro p er ly g ra n tedsu m m ary ju d g m en t o n F o rter ’s const i tut i on alcl ai m s r el at ed t o the pri son’ s r ef usalt o p rovi de F ort erw i th C hri st i an I de nt i tym a t e r i a l s he ha d or de r e d be c aus e F ort e rf a i l e d t o r a i s e age nui ne di s put e of m a t e r i a l f

a c ta s t o w he the rthe r e gul a t i on j us t i f y i ng w i thhol di ng the m a t e r i a l s i s not r e a s o n ab lyr e la te dto le g itim a te p e n o lo g ic a l in te r e s ts . See T urner v . Sa

f ley , 482 U . S . 7 8 , 8 9 (1 9 8 7 ) (“ [W ] h en a p ri so n reg u l at i o n i m p i n g es o n i n m at es’ c o n s titu tio n a l r ig h ts , th e r e g u la tio n is v a lidif it is r e a s o n ab lyr e la te dto le g itim a te p e n o lo g ic a l in te r e s ts .” ) ; s e e al s o C ut te rv . W

i lki ns on , 544 U . S . 709, 725 n. 13 ( 2 0 0 5 ) ( “[ P ]r is o n s e c u r ityis ac o m p e llin g s ta te in te r e s t, a n d. . . d e f e r e n c e is du e to i nst i tut i on aloffi ci al s’ expert i se i n thi s are a. ”) . Th e d i s tr i c tc o u rtp r o p e r l yg r a n t e ds u mmaryj u d g me n to n Fo rt e r ’ s RLU I PA c l a i m r e ga r di ng the C hr i s t i a n I de nt i tym a t e r i a l s tha tw e r e w i thhe l d, a s w e l l a s the m a t e r i a l s tha tw e r e l a t e rgi ve n t o hi m , be c aus e F ort e rf a i l e d t o r a i s e age nui ne d is p u te a s to m a te r ia l f

a c t a s to w h e th e rth e c h a lle n g e dp o lic ys u b s ta n tia lly12- 35470 3 b u r d e n e dth e e x e r c is e o f h is r e lig io u s b e lie f

s . See W a rso ld i er v. W

o o d f o rd , 418 F . 3d 98 9, 99 4 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). M oreover, defe nd ant s w er e e nt i t l ed t o q ual i fi ed i m m un i ty and , as t o the m at er i al s he e ventual l y r ec ei ved, any i nj un ct i ve re l i ef w o u ldb e m o o t. See P e ars on v . Cal lahan , 55 5 U . S . 22 3, 24 3 (20 09 ) ( st at e off i ce rs ent i t l ed t o q ual i fi ed i m m un i ty i f thei r a ct i on s di d n otvi ol at e c l earl y e st abl i shed la w ) ; W arsoldi er , 4 1 8 a t 9 9 7 n .7 ( “T h e r e e x is ts little N in th C ir c u it au th o r ity c o n s tru in g R L U I P A .” ) ; cf . 42 U . S . C . § 2000c c - 3( e ) ( “ A gove rnm e ntm a ya voi d the pr e e m pt i ve f

or c e of a nypr ovi s i on of

[ R L U I P A ] . . . bypr ovi di ng e xe m pt i ons f r om the po l i cyor prac t i ce for app l i ca t i on s thatsubst ant i al l y burden rel i gi ou s e xerc i se , or by any other m eans thatel i m i nat es the subst ant i albu rden. ”) . T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ydi s m i s s e d F ort e r ’ s r e m a i ni ng c l a i m s w i thout p rej u d i ce b ecau se F o rt er fai l edt o ex h au sth i s ad m i n i strat i v e rem ed i es. See W oodf ord v . N go , 5 4 8 U .S . 8 1 , 9 3 - 9 5 ( 2 0 0 6 ) ( r e q u ir in g p r o p e ra n dtim e ly exhaust i on of pri soner c l ai m s) . T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otcl earl y e rri n fi nd i ng that F o rte rf a ile dto p u r s u e a ll le v e ls o f a d m in is tr a tiv e g r ie v a n c e s a v a ilab le to h im . C f. Sa p p v . Kim b r e ll , 62 3 F . 3d 81 3, 82 2-23 (9th C i r. 20 10 ) ( exhaust i on i s notre qu i re d w here adm i ni strat i ve re m edi es ar e r endered “ ef fe ct i vel y unavai l abl e” ). F ort e r ’ s c ont e nt i ons r e ga r di ng a l l e ge d pe ndi ng di s c ove ry , j udi c i a l bi a s , a nd th e c o u rt’s f

a ilu r e to a d d r e s s h is e q u a l p r o te c tio n c la im a r e u n p e r s u a s iv e . H is12- 35470 4 r e l i a nc e on McCab e v . A rave , 827 F . 2d 634 ( 9th C i r . 1987) , i s m i s pl a c e d. AF F I RME D.