alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5418 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5418

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out the Medical 
      Surgical Prime Vendor program using multiple prime vendors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Affairs Medical-Surgical 
Purchasing Stabilization Act''.

SEC. 2. MEDICAL SURGICAL PRIME VENDOR PROGRAM.

    (a) Vendors.--In procuring certain medical, surgical, and dental 
supplies or laboratory supplies for medical centers of the Department 
of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall carry out 
the Medical Surgical Prime Vendor program, or successor program, in a 
manner that--
            (1) requires the Secretary to award contracts to multiple 
        regional prime vendors instead of a single nationwide prime 
        vendor; and
            (2) prohibits a prime vendor from solely designing the 
        formulary of such supplies.
    (b) Clinically Driven Sourcing.--
            (1) Expertise.--In carrying out the formulary of supplies 
        under the Medical Surgical Prime Vendor program, or successor 
        program, the Secretary shall ensure that each employee of the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs who conducts formulary analyses 
        or makes decisions with respect to including items on the 
        formulary has medical expertise relevant to the items for which 
        the employee conducts such analyses or makes such decisions.
            (2) Lists.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, and quarterly thereafter with respect to 
        any updates, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on 
        Veterans' Affairs of the House of Representatives and the 
        Senate a list of each employee described in paragraph (1) and 
        the relevant medical expertise of the employee, listed by the 
        categories of items in the formulary described in such 
        paragraph.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2010231EN.01000701.xml

| 27.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 August 2010

2010/C 231/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2693 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 107,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4469 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81745 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4297 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3027 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0040 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,858 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 283,63 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7085 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9907 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2520 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9345 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4318 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3425 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8722 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8060 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7223 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 510,80 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2917 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6310 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2755 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 402,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9880 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,330 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,0890 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,796 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2340 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4679 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,4652 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2693

JPY

Japanese yen

107,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4469

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81745

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4297

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3027

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0040

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,858

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

283,63

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7085

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9907

RON

Romanian leu

4,2520

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9345

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4318

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3425

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8722

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8060

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7223

KRW

South Korean won

1 510,80

ZAR

South African rand

9,2917

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6310

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2755

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 402,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9880

PHP

Philippine peso

57,330

RUB

Russian rouble

39,0890

THB

Thai baht

39,796

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2340

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4679

INR

Indian rupee

59,4652

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2011229EN.01000702.xml

| 4.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6290 — PORR/Teerag-Asdag)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 229/03

On 20 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6290. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6290. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B OB B I E E DE L E N, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. BO A RD O F PRI SO N TERM S, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 55246 D . C . N o. C V -07-02 86 2-R ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M a nue l L . R e a l , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry10, 2011 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T A L L M A N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es 

# FI LED JAN 19 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSW e c e rt i f yf orappe a l , on ourow n m ot i on, the i s s ue of w he the rthe 1 2005 de c i s i on of

the C a l i f

orni aB oa r d of

P r i s on T e rm s t o de nypa r ol e vi ol a t e d due pr oc e s s . W e de c l i ne t o i s s ue ac e rt i f i c a t e of appe a l abi l i tya s t o E de l e n’ s r e m a i ni ng cl ai m s. 08- 55246 2 C al i forni a s t at e pri soner B ob bi e E del en appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f irm . 1 E d e le n c o n te n d s th a t th e B o a r do f P r is o n T e rm s ’s 2 0 0 5 d e c is io n to d e n yh im pa r ol e w a s nots upport e d by“ s om e e vi de nc e ” a nd the r e f or e vi ol a t e d hi s due proces s r i gh t s. T he st at e c ou rtdi d n otun re as on abl y c on cl ud e thatsom e e vi dence s up p o rts th e B o ar d ’s d e c is io n . See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 ( d ) ; see a l so H ayw ard v. M a rs h a ll , 6 0 3 F .3 d5 4 6 , 5 6 2 - 6 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 0 ) . A FFI R M ED .
No. 1413, Misc.

#### Jackson *v.*Michigan.

Supreme Court of Michigan. Certiorari denied.
#### STATE v. WESTRY

No. 157 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 1.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1972.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, this notice announces a meeting of the Department of Defense Historical Advisory Committee. The meeting will be open to the public.

# DATES:

Tuesday, March 13th at 10 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held on the 5th Floor, Suite 5000, 1777 North Kent Street, Arlington, Virginia 22209.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mrs. Pamela Bennett at 703-588-7889 or Ms. Carolyn Thorne at 703-588-7890 for information, and or upon arrival at the building in order to be admitted.

Dated: February 12, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-893 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5000-06-M
NIOSH Conformity Assessment Letter to

Manufacturers

NIOSH CA 2019-1022

September 2019

 

Interim Resolution to Issue Affecting Chemical Warfare Agent (CWA) Testing 

for NIOSH CBRN Respirator Approvals, supplements CA-2019-1018 and 1021
Document Number

NIOSH CA 2019-1022

Page 2 of 2

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) employs the U.S. 

Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center (CCDC 

CBC) to conduct Chemical Warfare Agent (CWA) testing. These services support the 

NIOSH Respirator Approval Program by completing CWA testing for chemical, biological, 

radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) respiratory protection conformance.

On September 11, 2019, CCDC CBC informed NIOSH the safety stand-down was lifted for 

distilled sulfur mustard (HD) testing. Based on CCDC CBC data, NIOSH decided to pursue 

high concentration HD testing and accepted CCDC CBC corrective actions developed to 

resolve the June 10, 2019 CCDC CBC Simulant Agent Resistant Test Manikin 

(SMARTMAN) Laboratory safety stand-down for high concentration distilled sulfur 

mustard vapor and liquid testing. 

High concentration HD testing to support the NIOSH CBRN approval program resumed 

on September 12, 2019.

Subject: Interim Resolution to Issue Affecting Chemical Warfare Agent (CWA) 

Testing for NIOSH CBRN Respirator Approvals, supplements CA-2019-1018 and 1021
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Josh Levine, certify that:

 

1.  I havereviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (the “Company”);

 

2.  Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report;

 

3.  Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;

 

4.  The Company’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:

 

(a)  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)  Designedsuch internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)  Disclosedin this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period coveredby this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.  The Company’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

 

(b)  Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: April 2, 2014
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7485

JIMMY BOWMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

J. T. MANN, individually and in official capacity, Detective, Prince George Police 

Department; DET. BRYANT, individually and in official capacity, Detective, 

Prince George Police Department,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00521-REP-RCY)

Submitted: March 30, 2017 Decided: April 3, 2017

Before TRAXLER and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Bowman, Appellant Pro Se. Jim H. Guynn, Jr., GUYNN & WADDELL P.C., 

Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Bowman appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) complaint. Bowen’s claims are not cognizable under § 1983 because a judgment 

in his favor would necessarily imply that his subsequent criminal conviction was invalid 

and Bowen has not shown that his conviction has been reversed, expunged, declared 

invalid, or otherwise called into question. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 

(2006). Because Bowman may refile his claims should his conviction ever be overturned 

or called into question by the appropriate court, we modify the dismissal to be without 

prejudice and affirm as modified.*

 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

 * In the district court, Bowman included a state constitutional claim. The district 

court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over this claim and dismissed it 

without prejudice. Bowen does not challenge this ruling in his informal brief. See 4th 

Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”).
N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 1:11-CR-6-SPM/GRJ

JAMES R. ABERNATHY,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER

For good cause shown, the “Motion to Seal Notice of Filing and Exhibits

Thereto (Doc 46)” (doc. 48) is granted. The clerk is directed to seal doc. 46.

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of March, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00006-SPM-GRJ Document 50 Filed 03/02/12 Page 1 of 1
NIOSH Respiratory Protective Device Information

 NIOSH CA 2023-1071

 November 2023

 

Effective Immediately: Voluntary Rescission of 48 Honeywell International 

Inc. Approvals
Document Number

NIOSH CA 2023 – 1071

Page 2 of 2

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has honored a request by Honeywell 

International Inc. to voluntarily rescind 48 NIOSH respirator approvals issued to Honeywell 

International Inc.

As of November 29, 2023, any respirator marked with a NIOSH approval label with the below 

approval numbers are no longer NIOSH approved. The NIOSH Certified Equipment List no longer 

includes these approval numbers:

23C-3483 23C-3510 23C-3511 23C-3512 23C-3513 23C-3528

23C-3529 23C-3534 23C-3535 23C-3536 23C-3537 23C-3580

23C-3581 23C-3582 23C-3583 23C-3584 23C-3590 23C-3591

23C-3592 23C-3593 23C-3596 23C-3597 23C-3598 23C-3600

23C-3602 23C-3603 23C-3604 23C-3605 23C-3610 23C-3611

23C-3612 23C-3613 23C-3618 23C-3620 23C-3622 23C-3624

23C-3630 23C-3631 23C-3632 23C-3633 23C-3638 23C-3639

23C-3640 23C-3641 23C-3644 23C-3645 23C-3648 23C-3649

Due to the voluntary rescission of these NIOSH approvals, respirators bearing these NIOSH approval 

numbers may no longer be used, manufactured, assembled, sold, or distributed.

Please reach out to Honeywell International Inc. for additional details related to their decision to 

voluntarily rescind 48 approvals issued to Honeywell International Inc. identified in this notice. The 

Certified Equipment List can be used to locate other NIOSH Approved® respirators.

NIOSH Approved® is a certification mark of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) registered in the 

United States and several international jurisdictions

Effective Immediately: Voluntary Rescission of 48 Honeywell International Inc. 

Approvals
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Pacific  Bepure  Industry Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q,  for the fiscal  quarter  ended  September 30, 2011, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, Haiting Li,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2011
                                             By: /s/ Haiting Li
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Haiting Li
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-82]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE BOARD OF GOVERNORS


Sunshine Act Meeting

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, January 9, 2007, at 2 p.m.; and Wednesday, 
January 10, 2007, at 8:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m.

PLACE: Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 
L'Enfant Plaza, SW., in the Benjamin Franklin Room.

STATUS: January 9--2 p.m.--Closed; January 10-8:30 a.m.--Open; January 
10--10:30 a.m.--Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Tuesday, January 9 at 2 p.m. (Closed)

    1. Strategic Planning.
    2. Rate Case Update.
    3. Financial Update.
    4. Labor Negotiations Update.
    5. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.
    6. Governors' Executive Session--Discussion of prior agenda items 
and Board Governance.

Wednesday, January 10 at 8:30 a.m. (Open)

    1. Minutes of the Previous Meeting, December 5-6, 2006.
    2. Remarks of the Postmaster General and CEO Jack Potter.
    3. Committee Reports.
    4. Consideration of Board Resolution on Capital Funding.
    5. Consideration of Annual Report on Government in the Sunshine Act 
Compliance.
    6. Consideration of Fiscal Year 2006 Comprehensive Statement on 
Postal Operations, including the Preliminary Fiscal Year 2008 Annual 
Performance Plan--GPRA.
    7. Briefing on Mail Visibility, Seamless Acceptance and Payment.
    8. Consideration of the Price of Semipostal Stamps.
    9. Capital Investment--5,856 Carrier Route Vehicles.
    10. Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Board of 
Governors.
    11. Tentative Agenda for the March 28-29, 2007, meeting in 
Washington, DC.

Wednesday, January 10 at 10:30 a.m. (Closed)--If Needed.

    1. Continuation of Tuesday's closed session agenda.

Contact Person for More Information: Wendy A. Hocking, Secretary of the 
Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 
20260-1000. Telephone (202) 268-4800.

Wendy A. Hocking,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-82 Filed 1-8-07; 3:19 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-M