alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A96A0594.

#### DURFEE v. THE STATE.

(471 SE2d 32)

Judge Harold R. Banke.

After a bench trial, Vickie Hailey Durfee was convicted of one count of trafficking in cocaine and one count of criminal attempt to traffic in cocaine. On appeal, she argues that her convictions exposed her to double jeopardy and challenges the sufficiency of the evidence on the attempt charge.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the State’s evidence showed that Durfee entered into a drug transaction with a confidential informant which involved the transfer of approximately two ounces of cocaine. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307, 319-320 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). The transaction which provided the basis for the second count occurred when the confidential Informant delivered several ounces of “sham” cocaine to Durfee, who was arrested several moments later.

Prior to her convictions, federal authorities initiated a civil forfeiture proceeding against Durfee’s residence arising out of the same activity. After Durfee’s state court convictions, the forfeiture case culminated in a consent judgment requiring Durfee to pay $18,000 in lieu of forfeiting her property. *Held:*

*1.*The trial court properly rejected Durfee’s double jeopardy argument. Although the federal prohibition against double jeopardy may reach civil proceedings in “rare” instances when civil penalties may constitute punishments for double jeopardy purposes, it does not apply here because the double jeopardy clause reaches only subse*212quent punishments, not the initial punishment imposed for a criminal act. *United States v. Halper,*490 U. S. 435, 448-449 (109 SC 1892, 104 LE2d 487) (1989); *Moser v. Richmond County Bd. of Commrs.,*263 Ga. 63 (1) (428 SE2d 71) (1993).

Decided May 1, 1996

*Spruell & Dubuc, Billy L. Spruell, Melinda D. Taylor,*for appellant.

*Daniel J. Porter, District Attorney, Dan W. Mayfield, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Although the issue is one of first impression in this State, we believe jeopardy attached in the federal civil forfeiture action when the judgment was entered and the sanction actually meted out, which occurred after Durfee’s criminal convictions. Accord *United States v. Stanwood,*872 FSupp. 791 (D. Or. 1994). Because no other judgment had been rendered at the time of Durfee’s convictions, double jeopardy analysis has no application to this case.

This finding precludes Durfee’s arguments under state constitutional and statutory law. Moreover, Georgia’s statutory protections against double jeopardy have no application to civil proceedings. *Murphy v. State,*219 Ga. App. 474 (465 SE2d 497) (1995).

2. We reject Durfee’s argument that, because the informant supplied her with “sham” cocaine, the evidence of attempted trafficking was insufficient. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. at 319-320. The fact that Durfee attempted to traffic imitation cocaine does not relieve her of culpability absent evidence that she knew the substance was not cocaine. *Guzman v. State,*206 Ga. App. 170, 171-172 (2) (424 SE2d 849) (1992); OCGA § 16-4-4. No such evidence was presented.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Pope, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.*
| 1. | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended May 31,      2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      as amended; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:           November      19, 2009 | By:    | /s/      Erwin Vahlsing, Jr. |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                          | Name:  | Erwin      Vahlsing, Jr.     |   |
|                                                                                          | Title: | Chief      Financial Officer |   |
|                                                                                          |   |                         |
|                                                                                          |   |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JAMES W. DAVIS,

Plaintiff, CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00107-RH-WCS

vs.

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Defendant.

_______________________________/

PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL’S NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY ON APRIL 23, 2012

Plaintiff, JAMES DAVIS, through his counsel, hereby gives notice that the undersigned

is available on April 23, 2012 to try this case. Her conflict for that trial period has resolved.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Marie A. Mattox

Marie A. Mattox [FBN 0739685]

MARIE A. MATTOX, P.A.

310 East Bradford Road

Tallahassee, Florida 32303

(850) 383-4800 (telephone)

(850) 383-4801 (facsimile)

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing notice has been

furnished by CM/ECF to all counsel of record this 27th day of March, 2012.

 /s/ Marie A. Mattox 

Marie A. Mattox

Case 4:11-cv-00107-RH-CAS Document 60 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.1 - Letter Agreement with James Connor






Exhibit 10.1


June 10, 2014




James B. Connor
333 N. Massachusetts Avenue, #1001
Indianapolis, IN  46204


Dear Jim,


The Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has approved a $225,000 reimbursement to you in connection with your relocation to Indianapolis.  This reimbursement is intended to offset allowable costs (as defined in the Duke Realty Corporation Relocation Policy Tier 1 (“Relocation Policy”)) for the following items relating to the sale of your Chicago, IL residence:


		
	1)
	Home Marketing and Home Sale Assistance


		
	2)
	Brokerage Commission


		
	3)
	Duplicate Housing


		
	4)
	Loss-on-Sale Assistance (if any)


		
	5)
	Movement of Household Goods




The payment of $225,000 will be taxable to you so withholding taxes will be deducted from the payment as required by law.  This payment will constitute the company’s complete and final financial assistance related to the sale of your Chicago home now or in the future.  This payment will be paid to you as part of your regular pay as soon as practical following the execution of this agreement.  


Duke Realty will reimburse you for other direct relocation costs, other than those items listed above, including costs related to the acquisition of your residence in Indianapolis, in accordance with the company’s Relocation Policy.


Agreed to by:


	
			
	/s/ JAMES B. CONNOR


	 
	September 17, 2014

	James B. Connor
	 
	Date

	Chief Operating Officer, Duke Realty Corporation
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	On Behalf of Duke Realty Corporation:


	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ DENISE K. DANK


	 
	September 17, 2014

	Denise K. Dank
	 
	Date

	Chief Human Resources Officer
Articles of Incorporation
                              (Pursuant to NRS 78)

                                 STATE OF NEVADA
                               Secretary of State

1.       NAME OF CORPORATION: Eventemp Corporation

2.       RESIDENT  AGENT:  Sierra Nevada  Management  Corp., 1201 Foothill Road,
         Reno, NV 89511 (Name and address where process may be served)

3.       SHARES: The corporation is authorized to issue 3,000,000 shares of no
         par value common stock, with identical rights and privileges, transfer
         of which is restricted according to the Corporation Bylaws. Preemptive
         rights to acquire additional shares are neither limited or denied.

4.       GOVERNING BOARD: The Governing Board shall be styled as Directors. No
         Director shall be held liable to the corporation or its shareholders
         for monetary damages due to a breach of fiduciary duty, unless the
         breach is a result of self-dealing, intentional misconduct, fraud, or
         illegal actions. The first BOARD OF DIRECTORS shall consist of three
         members and their names and addresses are as follows:

         Bradley S. Schroeder  7900 E. Princess Dr.  Scottsdale,   Arizona 85255
                               #2026
         (Name)                 (Street Address)      (City)       (State) (Zip)

         Galen S. Schroeder    1900 E Winged Foot Dr.Chandler,     Arizona 85255
         (Name)                 (Street Address)      (City)       (State) (Zip)

         Jeffrey D. Hensley    8175 S. Virginia      Reno,         Nevada  89511
                               #850-259
         (Name)                 (Street Address)     (City)        (State) (Zip)

5.       PURPOSE (optional): Not Applicable.

6.       OTHER MATTERS: Not Applicable.

7.       SIGNATURE OF INCORPORATOR: In witness whereof, the undersigned
         incorporator has executed these Articles of Incorporation on the date
         below:

         Sierra Nevada Management Corp., 1201 Foothill Road, Reno,  NV     89511
         (Name)                          (Street Address)    (City)(State) (Zip)

         /s/ James M. Hensley, President             November 30, 1995
         Signature of Incorporator                   Date

         This  instrument  was  acknowledged  before me November 30, 1995, by
James M. Hensley,  President,  Sierra Nevada  Management  Corp.,  in the  state
of  Nevada,  County  of  Washoe,  as the  incorporator  of the  Eventemp
Corporation.

         /s/ Gary B. Carter
         Notary Public Signature

8. CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT OF RESIDENT AGENT:

I, Sierra Nevada Management Corp., hereby accept appointment as Resident Agent
for the above name corporation.

         /s/ James M. Hensley, President                      November 30, 1995
         Signature of Resident Agent                                   Date
EXHIBIT 32.2


                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Monarch Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending October 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Marshall Chadwell, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

    (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

Date: December 15, 2006

/s/   Marshall Chadwell
----------------------------
Marshall Chadwell
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Texas Gulf Energy, Incorporated, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), David Mathews, does hereby certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:



1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
of the Company.



|/s/   David Mathews                                                                                          | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|David Mathews
        Chief Executive Officer,
        Principal Executive Officer
        December 18, 2012 |
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of ecoSolutions Intl (the “Company”) hereby
      certifies that, to the best of her knowledge:




(iii)  The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,
      2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and




(iv)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August
              14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ JANE
              EMKESJane
              EmkesChief
                  Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5654 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5654

 To amend the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 to include the rural 
development voucher program as a covered housing program, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2018

  Mr. Gonzalez of Texas (for himself and Mr. Poliquin) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 to include the rural 
development voucher program as a covered housing program, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VAWA Protections for Rural Women Act 
of 2018''.

SEC. 2. COVERED HOUSING PROGRAMS.

    Paragraph (3) of section 41411(a) of the Violence Against Women Act 
of 1994 (34 U.S.C. 12491(a)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (I), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (J) as subparagraph (K); 
        and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (I) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(J) rural development housing voucher assistance 
                provided by the Secretary of Agriculture pursuant to 
                section 542 of the Housing Act of 1949 (42 U.S.C. 
                1490r), without regard to subsection (b) of such 
                section, and applicable appropriation Acts; and''.
                                 <all>
```
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 2923 Lower Tribunal No. CF20

- 008001

- XX

_____________________________ T EVIN J AMAR D AVIS , Appellant ,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County

. Wm. Bruce Smith , Judge. April 30, 2024
PER CURIAM

. AFFIRMED

. TRAVER , C

. J. , and STARGEL, J., and LAMBERT, B.D. , Associate Judge , c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kimberly Nolen Hopkins , Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Wendy Buffington , Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTI L TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - File No. 500-1 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of ABS Group, Inc. (n/k/a The Motion Picture Group, Inc.), because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended June 30, 1998. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Accrue Software, Inc., because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 28, 2002. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of iAsiaworks, Inc., because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2001. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Premier Laser Systems, Inc., because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 1999. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Siskon Gold Corp., because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 1997. 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Syquest Technology, Inc. (n/k/a SYQT, Inc.), because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended June 30, 1998. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on May 7, 2008, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on May 20, 2008. 

By the Commission. 

Jill M. Peterson, 

Assistant Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 08-1241 Filed 5-7-08; 10:47 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ERVIN JAMES HORTON, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv219-MP-CJK

SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated July 11, 2011. (Doc. 7). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. Plaintiff’s Complaint (doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as

malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), for abuse of the judicial process.

3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Supplement Objections (doc. 14) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of November, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00219-MP-CJK Document 15 Filed 11/07/11 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5613 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5613

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2018

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To designate the Quindaro Townsite in Kansas City, Kansas, as a 
                      National Commemorative Site.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. QUINDARO TOWNSITE NATIONAL COMMEMORATIVE SITE ACT.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Quindaro Townsite 
National Commemorative Site Act''.
    (b) Definition.--In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the 
Secretary of the Interior.
    (c) Designation.--The Quindaro Townsite in Kansas City, Kansas, as 
listed on the National Register of Historic Places, is hereby 
designated as the Quindaro Townsite National Commemorative Site. The 
Site shall not be considered a unit of the National Park System.
    (d) Administration.--Nothing in this section shall affect the 
administration of the Quindaro Townsite by Kansas City or the State of 
Kansas.
    (e) Cooperative Agreements.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
the State of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, and affected subdivisions, 
may enter into cooperative agreements with appropriate public or 
private entities, for the purposes of protecting historic resources at 
Quindaro Townsite and providing educational and interpretive programs 
for the public.
    (f) Technical Assistance.--The Secretary may provide technical 
assistance to any entity with which the Secretary has entered into a 
cooperative agreement under subsection (e).
    (g) Effect on Private Property, Local Land Use, and Land 
Acquisition Authority.--Nothing in this Act authorizes the Secretary 
to--
            (1) interfere with private property rights, or any local 
        zoning ordinance or land use plan of the State or any political 
        subdivision of the State; or
            (2) acquire land or interests in land through condemnation 
        or otherwise.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```