alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010066EN.01001101.xml

| 17.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 March 2010

2010/C 66/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3723 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4407 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90690 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7242 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4516 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0145 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,504 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,19 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7077 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8865 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0893 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0944 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5005 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3944 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6493 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9477 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9155 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 555,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,1320 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3672 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2570 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 581,48 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5538 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,740 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2510 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,497 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4197 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1894 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,4650 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3723

JPY

Japanese yen

124,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4407

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90690

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7242

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4516

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0145

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,504

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,19

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7077

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8865

RON

Romanian leu

4,0893

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0944

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5005

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3944

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6493

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9477

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9155

KRW

South Korean won

1 555,03

ZAR

South African rand

10,1320

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3672

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2570

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 581,48

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5538

PHP

Philippine peso

62,740

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2510

THB

Thai baht

44,497

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4197

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1894

INR

Indian rupee

62,4650

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is not citable as precedent. It is a public record. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

05-3240

LINDA M. OLLADO, Petitioner,

v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

__________ ________________ DECIDED: December 9, 2005

__________________________ Before NEWMAN, MAYER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM. Linda M. Ollado appeals the final decision of the Meri t Systems Protection Board that dismissed her petition for review as untimely filed without a showing of good cause for the delay. Ollado v. Office of Pers. Mgmt. , SE0831030274-I-3 (MSPB June 1, 2005). Because the board did not abuse its discretion or misapply the law, we affirm

. A petition for review by the board must be filed within thirty-five days of the administrative judge’s initia l decision unless good cause is shown for the delay. 5 C.F.R. §§ 1201.114(d), (f) (2004) . In this case, the admin istrative judge issued aninitial dec is ion on August 18, 2004. Ollado, however, did not file a petition for review until November 17, 2004, whic h was bey ond the thirty-five day deadline. As such, the initial decis ion becam e the final decisi on of the board on Septem ber 22, 2004. See id

. § 1201.113. “To establish good cause for a filing delay, an appellant must show that the delay

was excus able under the circumstances and that the appellant ex ercised due dilig enc e in attempting to meet the filin g d eadline.” Zamot v. Me rit Sys. Prot. Bd. , 332 F.3d 1374, 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2003) (citing Phillips v. United States Postal Serv. , 695 F.2d 1389, 1391 (Fed. Cir. 1982)). In addition, “the waiver of a regulatory time limit based on a showing of good cause ‘is a matter committed to the Boar d’s dis c retion and . . . this court will not substitute its own judgment for that of the Board.’” Id. (quoting Mendoza v

. Merit Sys.
Prot. Bd. , 966 F.2d 650, 653 (Fed. Cir. 1992) (en banc )). Ollado did not set forth any
evidenc e establishing good caus e for the delay; therefore, the boar d did not abuse its discretion.

05-3240 2
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,      2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Sonasoft Corp. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 15, 2009                                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                   |
| /s/Paresh Mehta                                                        |
| Paresh      MehtaPrincipal      Financial and Accounting Officer  |
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alcantara Brands Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robertson J. Orr, President and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/S/ Robertson J. OrrRobertson J. OrrPresident andPrincipal Financial OfficerMay 21, 2010
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

March 22, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129861 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

YVONNE TROST, Next Robert P. Young, Jr. Friend of MEGAN ARP, 

Minor, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 129861 

 COA: 261715 

Wayne CC: 03-321303-NO

FRED MILZ,

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

MICHAEL SCHUSTER and GARDEN CITY 

PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 

 Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 29, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0315 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 22, 2006 

Clerk
Case 3:11-cr-00041-MCR   Document 32   Filed 10/21/11   Page 1 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00041-MCR   Document 32   Filed 10/21/11   Page 2 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00041-MCR   Document 32   Filed 10/21/11   Page 3 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00041-MCR   Document 32   Filed 10/21/11   Page 4 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00041-MCR   Document 32   Filed 10/21/11   Page 5 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00041-MCR   Document 32   Filed 10/21/11   Page 6 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00041-MCR   Document 32   Filed 10/21/11   Page 7 of 7
Presidential Documents

31745 

Federal Register 

Vol. 73, No. 107 

Tuesday, June 3, 2008 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8262 of May 29, 2008 

Caribbean-American Heritage Month, 2008 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Caribbean-American Heritage Month is an opportunity to show our appreciation for the many ways Caribbean Americans have contributed to our country. 

Caribbean Americans have helped to shape our national fabric with their 

vibrant traditions and their unique history. They have brightened our lives 

with the spirit and vitality of their culture. Through strong leadership and 

pride in their heritage, they have enriched America. In all walks of life, 

they have contributed their many talents and added to our Nation’s development and prosperity. 

We especially show our gratitude for the men and women of Caribbean 

descent who have served bravely in our Armed Forces and those still serving 

today. These heroes have answered a call greater than self, and we keep 

them in our thoughts and prayers. 

During June, we celebrate and recognize the Caribbean Americans whose 

determination and hard work have helped make our country a better place. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim June 2008 as CaribbeanAmerican Heritage Month. I encourage all Americans to learn more about 

the history and culture of Caribbean Americans and their contributions 

to our Nation. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-ninth 

day of May, in the year of our Lord two thousand eight, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 08–1319 

Filed 6–2–08; 10:13 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


ebenthall on PRODPC60 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-1968

EDDIE L. ALLEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security Administration,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-98-1015-3-22BC)

Submitted: January 25, 2000 Decided: March 1, 2000

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

W. Daniel Mayes, Aiken, South Carolina, for Appellant. Frank W.

Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, J. Rene Josey, United States

Attorney, John Berkley Grimball, Assistant United States Attorney,

Deana R. Ertl-Lombardi, Chief Counsel, Region VIII, Yvette G.

Keesee, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of the General Counsel,

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Denver, Colorado, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Eddie Allen appeals the district court’s order upholding the

final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying

Allen’s application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income. We have reviewed the record, the briefs,

and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of

the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Allen v. Apfel,

No. CA-98-1015-3-22BC (D.S.C. May 11, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2011189EN.01001201.xml

| 29.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 189/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 189/12

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

2011/C 189/04

OJ C 140 of 11.5.2011

History of previous publications:

History of previous publications:

| | OJ C 121 of 19.4.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 121 of 19.4.2011

| | OJ C 94 of 26.3.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 94 of 26.3.2011

| | OJ C 88 of 19.3.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 88 of 19.3.2011

| | OJ C 26 of 28.1.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 26 of 28.1.2011

| | OJ C 296 of 30.10.2010 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 296 of 30.10.2010

| | OJ C 76 of 25.3.2010 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 76 of 25.3.2010

---
# C_2010013EN.01001201.xml

| 20.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5731 — AXA LBO FUND IV/Home Shopping Europe)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 13/04

On 14 January 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5731. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5731. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00359

- CV

Lone Star National Bank

v. Armando Gamboa and Gamboa Construction, LLC

On a ppeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 2472

- 15

- G

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APP EALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified bel ow for observance. October 1, 2015
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40180

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN JAIME GONZALEZ HUITRON, also known as Jaime Espinoza

Guiterrez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:00-CR-91-ALL

--------------------

October 29, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan Jaime Gonzalez Huitron appeals the 57-month sentence

imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found

in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in

his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element

of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.

Huitron acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the

Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
No. 01-40180

-2-

523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for

Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Huitron’s

argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
---

EXHIBIT 10.1

Amendment to Share Purchase Agreement between Bark Group
Inc. (Purchaser) and shareholders of Tre Kronor Media AB (Sellers) made
April 9, 2010

|1) | The parties agree to annul section 2,5 in the Share
      Purchase Agreement under which the Sellers are entitled to reverse the
      Share Purchase Agreement if the buyer, in 2010, is unable to raise a total
      of $3,000,000 in share capital injections or external financing via
      convertible notes.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2) | The transaction between the Purchaser and the Sellers is
      considered fully executed by the signature of this
  document                                                                                                                                                                                        

|Stockholm, August 9, 2010 |                  |                     
|------------------------- | ---------------- | --------------------
|                          |                  |                     
|For the Purchaser:        | For the Sellers: |                     
|                          |                  |                     
|Bent Helvang              | Niclas Fröberg   | Carl Johan Grandison
|                          |                  |                     
|Klaus Aamann              | Jacob de Geer    | Filip Scheja        
|                          |                  |                     
|                          | Malin Johansson  | Linda Kokovic       
|                          |                  |                     
|                          | Helena Westin    |                     

---
# C_2011081EN.01000501.xml

| 15.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6110 — Aegon/Unnim/Caixasabadell Vida)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 81/02

On 2 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6110. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6110. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2010219EN.01000601.xml

| 13.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 August 2010

2010/C 219/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2790 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 109,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4507 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82060 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4780 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3492 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9645 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,890 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,43 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7084 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0243 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2375 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9504 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4321 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3398 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9344 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8060 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7431 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 523,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3832 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6781 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2313 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 534,29 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0736 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,150 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,1906 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,864 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2744 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3596 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,8250 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2790

JPY

Japanese yen

109,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4507

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82060

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4780

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3492

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9645

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,890

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,43

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7084

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0243

RON

Romanian leu

4,2375

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9504

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4321

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3398

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9344

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8060

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7431

KRW

South Korean won

1 523,00

ZAR

South African rand

9,3832

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6781

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2313

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 534,29

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0736

PHP

Philippine peso

58,150

RUB

Russian rouble

39,1906

THB

Thai baht

40,864

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2744

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3596

INR

Indian rupee

59,8250

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 23.2 Independent
Auditors Consent The Board of Directors
EFJ, Inc.: We consent to incorporation by reference in the
registration statements (Numbers 333-30673, 333-48880, 333-48840, 333-48836,
and 333-48834) on Form S-8 of EFJ, Inc. (formerly Transcrpyt
International, Inc.) (the Company) of our report dated February 16,
2001, relating to the consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders equity, and cash flows of the Company and its subsidiaries for
the year ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the 2002 Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company. Our report dated February 16, 2001 contains an
explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has suffered recurring
losses from operations which raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of that uncertainty. /s/ KPMG LLP February 28, 2003
Omaha, Nebraska


---