alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07

- 12

- 0466

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

DECEMBER 28 , 2012

JACQUELINE A. BAILEY

,
Appellant

v.

TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION

,
Appellee

_____________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY;

NO. C

- 1

- CV

- 11

- 009239; HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS , PRESIDING

**On Motion to Dismiss**

Before QUINN , C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE , JJ.

App ellant Jacqueline A. Bailey h as filed a motion to dismiss her appeal , signed by

appellant’s attorney, based on the Texas Supreme Court’s holding in Pra i rie View A&M

Univ. v. Chatha, 381 S.W.3d 500 (Tex. 2012)

, that compliance with mandatory statutory

requirements for filing a lawsuit against governmental entities is a jurisdictional m atter.

Dismissal of appellant’s appeal will not prevent her from seeking relief to which she is

entitled.

Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss with

prejudice pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and di smiss the appeal.2 Having dismissed the appeal at appellant = s request, no motion for rehearing will be

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

Per Curiam
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5662 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5662

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize the charitable 
              mileage rate with the business travel rate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2018

Mr. Nolan (for himself and Mr. Peterson) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to equalize the charitable 
              mileage rate with the business travel rate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Volunteer Driver Tax Appreciation 
Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CHARITABLE MILEAGE RATE.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (i) of section 170 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``14 cents per mile'' and 
inserting ``the rate determined by the Secretary, which rate shall not 
be less than the standard mileage rate used for purposes of sections 
162 and 212''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.1


 


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


September 25, 2014


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Argus Select 30 Equity Total
Return Trust, Series 2


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Argus Select 30 Equity Total Return Trust, Series 2 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on September 25, 2014, in accordance with the valuation method set forth
in the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-198086) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO_______________ 


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7173

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STANLEY HOBEREK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-99-13) Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 7, 2005 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stanley Hoberek, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Stanley Hoberek, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000 & Supp. 2005) motion, construed by the court as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any di spositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hoberek has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00647-CV

In the Interest of J.D.H. and D.M.D.C., Children

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA01776

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Irene Rios, Justice

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 6, 2019

AFFIRMED

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights to her 

two children, J.D.H. and D.M.D.C. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief 

containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating there are no arguable grounds 

to be advanced. Counsel concluded the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief met the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); see In re R.R., No. 04–03–00096–CV, 

2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders

procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights).1 Counsel provided appellant with a copy 

of the brief. Appellant was informed of her right to review the record and advised of her right to 

 1

The brief in this case was filed prior to this court’s opinion in In re N.F.M., No. 04-18-00475-CV, 2018 WL 6624409, 

at *2-4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio December 19, 2018) (denying motion for en banc reconsideration of order striking

Anders brief).
04-18-00247-CV

- 2 -

file a pro se brief. The State waived its right to file an appellee’s brief unless appellant filed a pro 

se brief. Appellant has not filed a brief. After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree 

the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Therefore, the trial court’s termination order is affirmed.

Irene Rios, Justice
January 24, 2006 31-06 Atteog
. IN

Larry Elliott, Director

Office of Compensation Analysis & Support
National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health
4676 Columbia Parkway, C-46

Cincinnati, OH 45226

Re: Changes in Hanford Claim Rules
File Number:

Dear Mr. Elliott:

Your office has tentatively denied our claim for our father’s death which is directly
related to his employment at the Hanford Nuclear Site. Our father was exposed many
times to different radiation leaks and exposure to radiation during his employment at the
Hanford Nuclear Site. He died a very slow and painful death. If the Federal Government
wants to change to rules to make it easier for survivors and family members to claim
benefits due them, then by all means let it happen. It shouldn’t have to take two to three
years to compensate claimants. The fact of employment and job type is enough to make
a decision knowing full well the extent of the radiation leaks and releases that have gone
on at Hanford over the years. The monitoring badges were inadequate and probably still
are in determining radiation doses. The exposure effects of radiation on the human body
are never the same twice, as you well know.

The compensation amounts were allocated by Congress. The money allocated by
Congress is taxpayer’s money, i.e., our money! This money does not belong to your
office or any other office in this long drawn out claim process.

This letter is my formal comment regarding the changes in the Hanford Claim rules.

Sincerélv. -

Ce: Senator Maria Cantwell
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by N i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2).

T he H onor abl e M orr i s on C . E ngl a nd, J r . , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge ** * f orthe E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof C a l i f orni a , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GE OR GE Q. C HE N, A p p e lla n t, v. E . L Y N N S C H O E N M A N N , a s T rus t e e of the C hapt e r7 E s t a t e of

G e or ge Q . C he n, A pp el l ee . N o. 10- 17371 D . C. N o . 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 1 4 6 - J SW ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o r th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J e f f r e y S . W hi t e , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r7, 2011 ** S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: O ’ S C A N N L A IN and B E R Z O N , C i rc ui tJudg es , and E N G L A N D , D i stri ct Judg e. *** 

# FI LED DE C 13 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSG e or ge C he n c ont e nds tha tthe ba nkrupt c y c our te rr e d w he n i tf ound tha the r e c e iv e d $ 7 2 9 ,0 4 4 .1 9 in p o s t- p e titio n p a y m e n ts o n a c c o u n t o f ap r e - p e titio n lo a n . W e r e v ie w th e b a n k ru p tc y c o u rt’s f a c tu a l f in d in g s f o rc le a re rr o r . Se e , e . g. , In re Int ’l Fi berc om , Inc. , 5 0 3 F . 3 d 9 3 3 , 9 4 0 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 7 ). T h e co u rth eard tw o d ays of t e s t i m ony , e xa m i ne d the pa rt i e s ’ e xhi bi t s , a nd r e vi e w e d a n e xpe r tr e por t . T he re cord prov i des m ore than adequ at e s up po rtfor the fa ctual det erm i nat i on s m ade, in c lu d in g th e c o u rt’s r e

je c tio n o f

C h e n ’s e x p la n a tio n f

o rth e c h e c k s m a d e p a y ab le t o c a s h orde nom i na t e d a s r e pa y m e ntof l oa ns . W e thus c onc l ude tha tthe bank rupt cycourtdi d n otcl earl y e rr . C hen al so cont ends thatthe courterre d w hen i tfoun d thathi s c on du ct w a rr a nt e d r e voc a t i on of hi s di s c ha r ge unde r11 U . S . C . § 727( d) . C he n di d not d is c lo s e to th e T ru s te e h is e n title m e n t to r e p a y m e n t o n th e lo a n o rth e e q u ity d is tr ib u tio n s h e r e c e iv e d a s p a rt- o w n e ro f ar e s tau r a n t. T h e r e c o r d th u s s u p p o r ts the c our t ’ s f

i ndi ng tha tC he n “ know i ngl y and f r audul e nt l y f

a i l e d t o r e por tthe a c qui s i t i on of

ore nt i t l e m e ntt o” pr ope r ty of the e s t a t e , 11 U . S . C . § 727( d) ( 2) , a nd th e r e w a s n o c le a re rr o r . A F F I R M E D .
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10204

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Rocky Daniel Flick, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:22-CR-53-1

______________________________

Before Smith, Higginson, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rocky Daniel 

Flick has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Flick has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 16, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10204 Document: 00516932575 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/16/2023
No. 23-10204

2

Flick’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th 

Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 23-10204 Document: 00516932575 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/16/2023
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1




              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of CDSI Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard J. Lampen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

         1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.











February 6, 2004                       /s/ Richard J. Lampen
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Richard J. Lampen
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
Miller, Diane M.

From:

Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:40 AM

To: niocindocket@cdc.gov

Subject: procedures for filing form for my deseased husband doe employee

good morning

i just read on a healthweb page inteli-health as a matter of fact about

the emloyees of the the department of defense or dept of energy ......

my husband hugh r herrick jr retired from the naval weapons station
goose creek sc also called pomflant nucter missle base. hugh was an
isnpector while the missles were being built exposed to everything there
for 18 years then he retired... he first retired from the navy after 21

years service an e-8 fire cotrol tech.

hugh passed away from real cell carcinoma sept 27th 1999....... after a

5 year struggle fighting the disease ..
is there any advise you could send me concerning this situation...... no
one in his family had cancer .......... i feel it was due to the

exposure of all the chemicals & radiation he was exposed to for so
long...

thanking you for any help you maybe to inform me furher on..........
lauretta herrick

GOD BLESS AMERICA ....& MY FAMILY & FRIENDS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WESLEY ODOM,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:11-cv-75-RS-EMT

CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS

INC., and CITIGROUP INC.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Notice of Settlement (Doc. 162). Pursuant to N.D. Fla. 

Loc. R. 16.2(D), IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed with prejudice from the active docket of the 

court.

2. In the event that the settlement between these parties is not 

consummated, the Court reserves jurisdiction, upon motion filed 

by any party within 60 days of the date of this Order, to amend or 

vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file for administrative purposes, 

and upon the expiration of 60 days without activity, the clerk is 

directed to close the case in its entirety for all purposes.

Case 3:11-cv-00075-RS-EMT Document 163 Filed 11/26/14 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED on November 26, 2014.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00075-RS-EMT Document 163 Filed 11/26/14 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Thursday, April 10, 2008.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Enforcement Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 08-1051  Filed 3-14-08; 11:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5708 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5708

To convey a parcel of land in Quincy, Illinois, to the American Legion 
                   Post #37, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2018

  Mr. LaHood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To convey a parcel of land in Quincy, Illinois, to the American Legion 
                   Post #37, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Legion Post #37 Federal 
Land Conveyance Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE REQUIRED.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Administrator of General Services shall convey, 
without consideration, to the American Legion Post #37 (in this Act 
referred to as the ``recipient''), all right, title, and interest of 
the United States in and to the parcel of land described in subsection 
(b).
    (b) Description of Land.--The parcel of land is a part of a 5.00 
acre tract described in Book 385 Deeds at page 252, being a part of the 
Southeast Quarter of Section 31 in Township 1 South of the Base Line, 
Range 8 West of the Fourth Principal Meridian, City of Quincy, Adams 
County, Illinois, being described as follows: Beginning at the 
northwest corner of said 5.00 acre tract; thence South 89 degrees 55 
minutes 00 seconds East on the north line of said 5.00 acre tract 
454.67 feet to a point on the westerly right of way line of North 36th 
Street; thence South 00 degrees 07 minutes 26 seconds East on said 
westerly right of way line 95.81 feet; thence North 89 degrees 55 
minutes 00 seconds West leaving said westerly right of way line and 
parallel with said north line 454.79 feet to a point on the west line 
of said 5.00 acre tract; thence North 00 degrees 03 minutes 02 seconds 
on said west line 95.81 feet to the point of beginning, containing 1.00 
acre, more or less, and being subject to easements of record.

SEC. 3. CONDITION OF CONVEYANCE.

    The conveyance under section 2 shall be subject to the condition 
that the recipient accept the real property described in such section 
in its condition at the time of the conveyance, commonly known as 
conveyance ``as is''.

SEC. 4. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

    The Administrator of General Services may require such additional 
terms and conditions in connection with the conveyance under section 2 
as the Administrator considers appropriate to protect the interests of 
the United States.
                                 <all>
```
18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SLAP, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Wehrhahn,
President and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      April 7, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/ David
      WehrhahnName:
      David WehrhahnTitle:
      President (Principal Executive Officer)