alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011023EN.01000601.xml

| 25.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 January 2011

2011/C 23/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3571 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4530 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85160 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9530 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2989 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8830 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,219 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,02 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7030 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8770 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2665 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1262 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3690 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3498 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5810 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7871 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7417 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 523,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5862 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,9315 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3950 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 319,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1513 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,531 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,5200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,019 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2697 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3505 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,9200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3571

JPY

Japanese yen

112,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4530

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85160

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9530

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2989

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8830

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,219

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,02

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7030

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8770

RON

Romanian leu

4,2665

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1262

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3690

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3498

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5810

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7871

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7417

KRW

South Korean won

1 523,05

ZAR

South African rand

9,5862

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,9315

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3950

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 319,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1513

PHP

Philippine peso

60,531

RUB

Russian rouble

40,5200

THB

Thai baht

42,019

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2697

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3505

INR

Indian rupee

61,9200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2010312EN.01001001.xml

| 17.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5936 — EADS DS/ATLAS/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 312/05

On 28 October 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5936. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5936. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report onForm 10-KSB of BPZ Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year endedDecember 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I Edward G. Caminos, as Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| */s/**Edward G. Caminos* |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Edward G. Caminos        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer  |   |
|                     |   |
| October 16, 2006         |   |
|                          |        |  |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5420 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5420

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 2018

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To authorize the acquisition of land for addition to the Home of 
Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site in the State of New York, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FDR Historic Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. HOME OF FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE.

    (a) Land Acquisition.--The Secretary of the Interior is authorized 
to acquire by donation, purchase from a willing seller using donated 
funds, or exchange, the approximately 89 acres of land identified as 
the ``Morgan Property'' and generally depicted on the map titled ``Home 
of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site, Proposed Park 
Addition'', numbered 384/138,461 and dated May 2017.
    (b) Availability of Map.--The map referred to in subsection (a) 
shall be available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of 
the National Park Service.
    (c) Boundary Adjustment; Administration.--Upon acquisition of the 
land referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior 
shall--
            (1) adjust the boundary of the Home of Franklin D. 
        Roosevelt National Historic Site to reflect the acquisition; 
        and
            (2) administer such land as part of the Home of Franklin D. 
        Roosevelt National Historic Site in accordance with applicable 
        laws.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 26, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Order entered December 8, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-17-00775-CV
MARCANTONIO ENTERPRIS ES, LLC, Appellant
V. STELLAR RESTORATION SERVICES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-05272-2016 

### ORDER Before the Court are (1) appellee’s December 6, 2017 unopposed motion to reinstate the appeal, which was abated due to bankruptcy; (2) John S. Morgan’ s October 24, 2017 unopposed motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant; and (3) appellee’s response to the motion to withdraw. Appellee recites in its motion to reinstate that the bankruptcy court entered an order on October 11, 2017 modifying the automatic stay to permit the par ties to pursue and defend the appeal. Attached to the motion is a copy of the bankruptcy cou rt’s order. We GRANT appellee’s motion and REINSTATE the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.3(a).Because the motion to withdraw as counsel does not comply with the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5, we DENY that motion. See id. 6.5. The denial is without prejudice to refiling a m otion that complies with rule 6.5. We note both the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record have been filed. Accordingly,

we ORDER appellant to file its brie f no later than January 8, 2018. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

FREEMAN W. STONE, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv13-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated January 19, 2012. (Doc. 18). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections.

In his objection to the Report and Recommendation, the plaintiff argues that it is

inappropriate for an administrative law judge (ALJ) to rely on the Medical Vocational

Guidelines or Grids where, like the plaintiff, a claimant has non-exertional limitations

brought about by their mental health impairment. However, as the magistrate judge noted,

“[b]efore reaching the conclusion that the Grids will not be applied because the claimant

alleges non-exertional limitations, those non-exertional limitations must be severe enough

to restrict a full range of gainful employment at the designated level.” Kirk v. Secretary of

HHS, 667 F.2d 635, 647 (6th Cir. 1981). Thus, once the ALJ determined, based upon

substantial evidence, that the plaintiff’s mental impairment did not significantly limit his

ability to perform basic work activities, it was appropriate for the ALJ to use the Grids to

determine the availability of jobs that the plaintiff could perform with his exertional

limitations.

Case 1:11-cv-00013-MP-GRJ Document 20 Filed 02/24/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, denying plaintiff’s

applications for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits, is

AFFIRMED.

DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 1:11-cv-13-MP-GRJ

Case 1:11-cv-00013-MP-GRJ Document 20 Filed 02/24/12 Page 2 of 2
# C_2010353EN.01000701.xml

| 28.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 353/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 353/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5971 — PPC/Urbaser/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 353/02

On 17 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5971. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5971. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5385 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5385

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the program of 
payments to children's hospitals that operate graduate medical education 
                    programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Dr. Benjy Frances Brooks Children's 
Hospital GME Support Reauthorization Act of 2018''.
SEC. 2. PROGRAM OF PAYMENTS TO CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS THAT OPERATE 
GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
    Section 340E of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 256e) is 
amended--
        (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``and each of fiscal years 
    2014 through 2018,'' and inserting ``each of fiscal years 2014 
    through 2018, and each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023,'';
        (2) in subsection (b)(3)(D), by inserting ``and the end of 
    fiscal year 2022,'' after ``fiscal year 2018,''; and
        (3) in subsection (f)--
            (A) in paragraph (1)(A)--
                (i) in clause (iv), by striking ``; and'' and inserting 
            a semicolon;
                (ii) in clause (v), by striking the period at the end 
            and inserting ``; and''; and
                (iii) by adding at the end the following:
                ``(vi) for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023, 
            $105,000,000.''; and
            (B) in paragraph (2)--
                (i) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``; and'' and 
            inserting a semicolon;
                (ii) in subparagraph (E), by striking the period at the 
            end and inserting ``; and''; and
                (iii) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(F) for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023, 
        $220,000,000.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 32 (Friday, February 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7611-7617]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-728]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 07-13]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 604-
6575.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittal 07-13 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: February 12, 2007.
C.R. Choate,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 7612]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16FE07.000


[[Page 7613]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16FE07.001


[[Page 7614]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16FE07.002


[[Page 7615]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16FE07.003


[[Page 7616]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16FE07.004


[[Page 7617]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16FE07.005

[FR Doc. 07-728 Filed 2-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of GeoTel Communications Corporation on Form S-8 (File No. 33-21525) of our
report dated January 17, 1997, except as to the second paragraph in Note I for
which the date is March 20, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of GeoTel Communications Corporation as of December 31, 1996 and
1995, and for the two years then ended, which report is included in this 
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
        
        



                                                    /s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 1997
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT MEYER, Individually

and On Behalf of All Others 

Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-452/RS-EMT

THE ST. JOE COMPANY, 

ET AL., 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Motions for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff (Docs. 20 and 21) 

filed by Gerald L. Hess and Richard L. Kneisel and City of Southfield Fire & Police 

Retirement System. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The clerk shall ensure that counsel for Gerald L. Hess and Richard L. Kneisel, 

City of Southfield Fire & Police Retirement System, and Steven L. Weissmann are 

listed on CM/ECF as plaintiffs to ensure adequate electronic notice of all 

pleadings.

2. The prospective lead plaintiffs shall file a memorandum, not later than January 

24, 2011, why City of Southfield Fire & Police Retirement System is not entitled 

to be designated as lead plaintiff for having satisfied the requirements of 15 

U.S.C. § 78u-4(a)(3)(B)(iii). 
3. Specifically, responses shall address why their client’s (a) financial interest in the 

relief sought by the class; and (b) characteristics in reference to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23

make them more suited for the role of lead plaintiff. In addition, responses shall 

include whether City of Southfield Fire & Police Retirement System (a) will not 

fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class; and (b) is subject to unique 

defenses that render such plaintiff incapable of adequately representing the class. 

 

ORDERED on January 11, 2011

/S/ Richard Smoak

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00359-CV

GK GROUP, LLC, NOW KNOWN

AS DOWNTOWN M&M PROPERTIES, LLC,

Appellant

v.

MITCHELL RUDDER PROPERTIES, 

LP SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO 

KARBROOKE, INC., AND CITIBANK TEXAS N.A.,

Appellee

From the 85th District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 09-001441-CV-85

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants have filed an “Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). It states that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement and 

that Appellants seek dismissal of this appeal with costs to be assessed against the party 

incurring them.

Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it 
GK Group, LLC v. Mitchell Rudder Properties, LP Page 2

would otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed with 

each party to pay the costs in this behalf expended as they have been incurred.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed May 30, 2012

[CV06]
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ISHMAEL CASH ROLLE, III,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:11cv21-MCR/CJK

SIMMON, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated September 17, 2013 (doc. 31). Plaintiff has been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No timely

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, the court has determined that

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 27) is GRANTED.

3. Consistent with this order, the clerk is directed to enter summary final judgment

in favor of all defendants.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of November, 2013.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### OWENS v. MINERAL CO.

No. 65 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 84.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 February 1971.
# C_2011008EN.01002001.xml

| 13.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/20

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.5907 — Votorantim/Fischer/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 8/08

On 7 January 2011, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301 / 2967244) or by post, under reference COMP/M.5907 — Votorantim/Fischer/JV, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---