alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Soy Energy, LLC (the
Company) for the quarter ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Sand,
President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

| |                                                     
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Charles Sand                                    
| |                                                     
| |                                                     
| | Charles
 Sand, President and Chief Executive Officer
| | (Principal
 Executive Officer)                      
| |                                                     
| | Dated:
 September 14, 2009                          

---
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT L. RINKE, individually and

on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v. 3:10cv206-WS-EMT

BP, P.L.C., et al.,

 

ORDER OF DISQUALIFICATION

I hereby disqualify myself from participation as a judge in this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of June , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 3 Filed 06/15/10 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011115EN.01000102.xml

| 13.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6173 — Ageas/Sabanci Holding/Aksigorta)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 115/02

On 4 April 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6173. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6173. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011237EN.01000901.xml

| 13.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 August 2011

2011/C 237/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4250 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 109,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4491 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87635 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2376 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0984 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8260 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,186 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,68 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1518 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2835 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5346 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3780 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4063 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1099 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7223 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7271 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 539,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2383 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1129 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4543 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 200,31 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2779 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,621 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,5525 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,679 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3037 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5140 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,6170 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4250

JPY

Japanese yen

109,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4491

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87635

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2376

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0984

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8260

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,186

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,68

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1518

RON

Romanian leu

4,2835

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5346

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3780

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4063

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1099

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7223

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7271

KRW

South Korean won

1 539,62

ZAR

South African rand

10,2383

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1129

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4543

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 200,31

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2779

PHP

Philippine peso

60,621

RUB

Russian rouble

41,5525

THB

Thai baht

42,679

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3037

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5140

INR

Indian rupee

64,6170

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel, MLSCN HTS ASSAY.                    

*Date:*                         December 14, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         St. Gregory Hotel, 2033 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Yong Yao, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Room 6149, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, (301) 443-6102,                         *yyao@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281, Scientist Development Award, Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: November 16, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5809  Filed 11-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Aden Solutions Inc.(the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A-2 for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,
Silvia Soltan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 2nd day of July, 2008.



| | SILVIA SOLTAN                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Silvia Soltan                                      
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer











---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CEO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Ronald J. Buschur, Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended January 2, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                       |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 8, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ RONALD J. BUSCHUR
|                    |  |     |  |                       |  | Ronald J. Buschur                    
|                    |  |     |  |                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |     |  |                       |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
# C_2009170EN.01001202.xml

| 22.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5532 — Carphone Warehouse/Tiscali UK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 170/04

On 29 June 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5532. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5532. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DAVID McCISKILL,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv211/MCR/MD

COL. CHAD E. THOMPSON,

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

By order dated August 9, 2010, the court granted plaintiff’s Motion to Amend,

allowing thirty days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended

complaint within the prescribed period, and this matter is brought before the court

on the pending Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed June 28,

2010. Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B), and after reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the

Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of October, 2010.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global MobileTech, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Aik Fun Chong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  February 10, 2011

By:  /s/ Aik Fun Chong

 

       Aik Fun Chong

 

       President and Chief   

       Executive Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1
 EXHIBIT 4.94
 
 
 
 SHARE SALE AGREEMENT
     Business Venture Investments 750 (Pty) Ltd
       DRDGOLD (South African Operations) (Pty) Ltd


2
 WHEREAS:
 
  
 
 NOW THEREFOR
  SALE AND PURCHASE
      CLOSING AND IMPLEMENTATION


3
  WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS
             WHOLE AGREEMENT, NO AMENDMENT


4
  DOMICILIUM CITANDI ET EXECUTANDI
  domicilia citandi et executandi
       domicilium citandi et
 executandi vis-à-vis
 vis-à-vis
  th
      domicilium citandi et executandi
    domicilium citandi et executandi
          domicilium citandi et executandi


5
  NO CESSION OR ASSIGNMENT
     COSTS
        /s/ MP Ncholo MP Ncholo Chairman For: DRDSA
         /s/ JH Dissel JH Dissel Group Financial Manager For: BVI750 Name: _________________________
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RAY CHRIS MOBLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:11cv147/MCR/EMT

WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated January 11, 2012 (doc. 23). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute

or failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of February, 2012.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00147-MCR-EMT Document 24 Filed 02/17/12 Page 1 of 1
# CA2010254EN.01000901.xml

| 22.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 254/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 254/9

---

RESERVE LISTS (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITIONS EPSO/AD/163/09 (AD 6-AD 9) AND EPSO/AST/90/09 (AST 3)

IN THE FIELD OF DATA PROTECTION

(2010/C 254 A/02)

EPSO/AD/163/09 — Administrators (AD 6)

| AGNEW | Rosita |
| --- | --- |
| ARENAS | Pedro |
| BOSCH | Alba |
| CHRISTOVA | Alina |
| DE SCHUITENEER | Bart |
| GLORIOSO | Andrea |
| GODDIN | Gaetane |
| IATROU | Alexandros |
| JOHANSSON | Per |
| POZZATO | Vera |
| VELASCO | Luis |
| WILMAN | Folkert |

AGNEW

Rosita

ARENAS

Pedro

BOSCH

Alba

CHRISTOVA

Alina

DE SCHUITENEER

Bart

GLORIOSO

Andrea

GODDIN

Gaetane

IATROU

Alexandros

JOHANSSON

Per

POZZATO

Vera

VELASCO

Luis

WILMAN

Folkert

EPSO/AD/163/09 — Administrators (AD 9)

| BILLI | Carlo |
| --- | --- |
| DE MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ | Francisco Javier |
| HAVELANGE | Benedicte |
| PRISKER | Antje |
| STUER | Jan |

BILLI

Carlo

DE MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ

Francisco Javier

HAVELANGE

Benedicte

PRISKER

Antje

STUER

Jan

EPSO/AST/90/09 — Assistants (AST 3)

| ALEKSANDROV | Zdravko |
| --- | --- |
| DUDAS | Elod Ajtony |
| ENEV | Ivan |
| GALIATSOU | Afroditi |
| ISERENTANT | Marc |
| MONTENEGRO WARREN | Manuel |
| NIEDERER | Stefan |
| PALLA | Luisa |
| ROSSI | Dario |

ALEKSANDROV

Zdravko

DUDAS

Elod Ajtony

ENEV

Ivan

GALIATSOU

Afroditi

ISERENTANT

Marc

MONTENEGRO WARREN

Manuel

NIEDERER

Stefan

PALLA

Luisa

ROSSI

Dario

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2011 and may be extended.

31 December 2011

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

TERRANCE LORENZO SIM, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv415-RH/WCS

LT. SCOTT WELCH,

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

In an order entered on January 3, 2011, the pro se Plaintiff was directed to file a

second amended civil rights complaint. Doc. 19. Plaintiff was to have filed the pleading

by February 3, 2011. He has not done so. Furthermore, the prior court orders

instructed Plaintiff to "immediately file a notice to the Clerk's Office in the event that his

address changes or he is transferred or released from custody." Docs. 17, 19. Plaintiff

has not complied and that last order that was entered, doc. 18, has been returned to the

Court as undeliverable. Doc. 19. The website for the Georgia Department of

Corrections reveals that Plaintiff has been released from prison in Georgia, and no

forwarding address is available. In light of the mail return, doc. 19, and Plaintiff's failure
Page 2 of 2

to keep the Court informed as to his current address, this case should be dismissed for

failure to prosecute. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S. Ct. 1386, 8 L. Ed. 2d 734 (1962);

Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 44, 111 S. Ct. 2123, 2132, 115 L. Ed. 2d 27

(1991). Plaintiff has not demonstrated a desire to prosecute this case and the Court is

unable to locate Plaintiff. This case should now be dismissed.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on February 15, 2011.

 S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv415-RH/WCS