alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit No. 32.1**

Form 10-Q

SMSA El Paso 1 Acquisition Corp.

File No. 0-53132

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SMSA El Paso 1 Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard Crimmins, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  | (1)      | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)      | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: October 28, 2008                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | By: /s/ Richard Crimmins    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
|                                                | Richard Crimmins            |
|                                           | Chief Executive Officer     |
|                                                | and Chief Financial Officer |

----

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SMSA El Paso 1 Acquisition Corp. and will be retained by SMSA El Paso 1 Acquisition Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010301EN.01000101.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/1

---

2010/C 301/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 288, 23.10.2010

OJ C 288, 23.10.2010

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 274, 9.10.2010

OJ C 260, 25.9.2010

OJ C 246, 11.9.2010

OJ C 234, 28.8.2010

OJ C 221, 14.8.2010

OJ C 209, 31.7.2010

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

STANLEY N TAVORN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00225-RH -GRJ

S BEARDEN, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, an inmate of the Florida penal system proceeding pro se, has filed a

civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1). He also seeks to proceed

in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2).

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), which was enacted on April

26, 1996, provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action in forma pauperis under

28 U.S.C. § 1915:

if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained

in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States

that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is

under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Plaintiff has had two prior prisoner actions dismissed in the Middle and Southern

Districts of Florida on the grounds that they failed to state a claim, and he has had one

appeal dismissed as frivolous. The cases previously dismissed for failure to state a

claim are: Middle District case no. 2:06cv363-UA-SPC and Southern District case
Page 2 of 2

no.1:06cv20485-DLG. Further, in case No. 2:03cv14292-DLG, the Eleventh Circuit

dismissed the appeal as frivolous. 

The instant complaint alleges that personal property, including unspecified legal

materials, were confiscated when Plaintiff arrived at Madison CI, as well as a variety of

other complaints, none of which involves the "imminent danger" exception. 

Because Plaintiff has had at least three prior dismissals and is not under

imminent danger of serious physical injury, his request to proceed in forma pauperis

should be denied and this action should be dismissed. The dismissal should be without

prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to file a complaint with the full $350.00 filing fee.

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED

That Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) be DENIED and that

this cause be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

At Gainesville, Florida, this 28 day of October, 2010. th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), a party may file specific, written objections to

the proposed findings and recommendations within 14 days after being served with a

copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s

objections within 14 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific

objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and

recommendations.

Case No: 4:10-cv-00225-RH -GRJ
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-135076, No. 333-116930, No. 333-107525, No. 333-90045, No. 333-77943, No. 333-33038, No. 333-39396, No. 333-67692, No. 333-70334 and No. 333-145280) of Autobytel Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) of our reports dated March 17, 2008 related to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Our report, dated March 17, 2008, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2007, expressed an opinion that the Company had maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).



|                           
|---------------------------
|                           
|/s/ MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
|                           
|Irvine, California         
|March 17, 2008
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of National Holdings Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Mark Goldwasser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Mark
Goldwasser


Mark
Goldwasser


Chief
Executive Officer


December
29, 2009
# C_2011236EN.01000801.xml

| 12.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6264 — Rhone Capital/Triton/Evonik carbon black business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 236/06

On 19 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6264. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6264. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RITA BETY GARCIA-PEREZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-73099 

Agency No. A095-723-208 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 18, 2019**

Before: FARRIS, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. 

Rita Bety Garcia-Perez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to 

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v.

Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-73099 

petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Garcia-Perez’s motion to 

reopen as untimely where it was filed more than three years after the order of 

removal became final, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and where Garcia-Perez failed 

to establish materially changed country conditions in El Salvador to qualify for the 

regulatory exception to the time limitation for filing a motion to reopen, see 8 

C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); see also Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-90 (evidence must 

be “qualitatively different” to warrant reopening); Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 

988, 996 (9th Cir. 2008) (requiring movant to produce material evidence with 

motion to reopen that conditions in country of nationality had changed). GarciaPerez’s argument that the BIA failed to properly consider the evidence is 

unpersuasive. 

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to reopen proceedings 

sua sponte because Garcia-Perez has not raised a claim of legal or constitutional 

error. See Bonilla v. Lynch, 840 F.3d 575, 588 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[T]his court has 

jurisdiction to review Board decisions denying sua sponte reopening for the limited 
3 18-73099 

purpose of reviewing the reasoning behind the decisions for legal or constitutional 

error.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Advisory Group on Electron Devices

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The DoD Advisory Group on Electron Devices (AGED) announces a closed session meeting.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held at 9 a.m., Tuesday, February 27, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at ITS Noesis Business Unit, 4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Vicki Schneider, ITS Noesis Business Unit, 4100 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22203, 703-741-0300.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The mission of the Advisory Group is to provide advice to the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics to the Director of Defense Research and Engineering (DDR&E), and through the DDR&E to the Director, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Military Departments in planning and managing an effective and economical research and development program in the area of electron devices.

The AGED meeting will be limited to review of research and development efforts in electronics and photonics with a focus on benefits to national defense. These reviews may form the basis for research and development programs initiated by the Military Departments and Defense Agencies to be conducted by industry, universities or in government laboratories. The agenda for this meeting will include programs on molecular electronics, microelectronics, electro-optics, and electronic materials. In accordance with Section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2), it has been determined that this Advisory Group meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), and that accordingly, this meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: February 6, 2007.

Patricia L. Toppings,

Alternate, OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-611 Filed 2-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RONALD BROOKS,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv397/LAC/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated August 30, 2011 (doc. 27). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 18) is GRANTED.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice as

untimely. 

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30 day of September, 2011. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00397-LC-EMT Document 29 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2010045EN.01000101.xml

| 23.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5714 — Scholz/Scholz Austria/Kovosrot)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 45/01

On 4 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5714. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5714. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011060EN.01000902.xml

| 25.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5978 — GDF Suez/International Power)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 60/05

On 26 January 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M5978. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M5978. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of National Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan B. Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Alan B. LevinAlan B. LevinChief Financial Officer

December 29, 2010
# C_2011129EN.01000201.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 April 2011

2011/C 129/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4860 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4576 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89170 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9140 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2867 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7820 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,223 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9356 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0780 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2580 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3560 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4102 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,5427 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8414 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8205 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 588,61 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7994 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6456 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3615 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 728,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4015 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,475 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6463 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,387 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3464 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1186 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,7030 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4860

JPY

Japanese yen

120,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4576

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89170

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9140

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2867

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7820

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,223

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9356

RON

Romanian leu

4,0780

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2580

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3560

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4102

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,5427

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8414

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8205

KRW

South Korean won

1 588,61

ZAR

South African rand

9,7994

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6456

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3615

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 728,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4015

PHP

Philippine peso

63,475

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6463

THB

Thai baht

44,387

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3464

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1186

INR

Indian rupee

65,7030

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---