alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cr101/MCR

DENNIS M. CARONI; GERARD M. 

DILEO; and JOSEPH GEORGE

PASTOREK, II,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

The defendants have been charged with conspiracy to dispense controlled

substances through prescriptions, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(C) and

(b)(1)(D), and 21 U.S.C. § 846; and conspiracy to engage in money laundering, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) and 21 U.S.C. § 846. The government has rested its case.

The defendants each moved orally for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that the evidence

presented is insufficient to sustain a conviction on either count of the indictment. See Fed.

R. Crim. P. 29(a). 

A motion for judgment of acquittal under Rule 29(a) at the conclusion of the

government's case may only be granted if “the evidence is insufficient to sustain a

conviction.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 29(a). The court views the evidence in the light most

favorable to the government and draws all reasonable inferences in favor of the

government. See United States v. Gari, 572 F.3d 1352, 1359 (11th Cir. 2009), cert.

denied, 130 S. Ct. 1560 (2010). The trial court's inquiry is whether a reasonable fact finder

could find the evidence sufficient to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. 

Id.

The court ruled on the motions from the bench on November 14, 2011, and this

Case No. 3:10cr101/MCR
Page 2 of 2

order memorializes those rulings. Applying the standards articulated above, the court

denied each motion for judgment of acquittal with reasons articulated in full on the record.

Accordingly, for reasons stated on the record at trial, it is hereby ORDERED that the

defendants’ oral motions for judgment of acquittal (noted on the court’s docket as docs.

418, 419, 420) are DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of November, 2011.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cr101/MCR
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANDREW ROMEO JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00513-MP -WCS

BRYANT, WALTER A MCNEIL, PIPPEN,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 10, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that Plaintiff's motion for injunction and restraining order,

Doc. 8, be denied, and this case be remanded for further proceedings. Plaintiff has not objected

to the recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is

accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 10, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein.

2. The Motion for Injunction and Restraining Order, Doc. 8, is DENIED and the 

case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of March, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 13, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 6917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-697]



[[Page 6915]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part VI





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Memorandum of February 5, 2007--Assignment of Functions Under Section 
556 of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2007


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 29 / Tuesday, February 13, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 6917]]

                Memorandum of February 5, 2007

                
Assignment of Functions Under Section 556 of the 
                John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for 
                Fiscal Year 2007

                Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and laws of the United States, including 
                section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby 
                assign to you the functions of the President under 
                section 556 of the John Warner National Defense 
                Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-
                364).

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, February 5, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-697
Filed 2-12-07; 11:11 am]
Billing code 5000-04-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00796-CR

John Domingo Perez, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 2042564, HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

John Domingo Perez seeks to appeal from a judgment of conviction for aggravated

assault. Sentence was imposed on August 14, 2006. There was no motion for new trial. The

deadline for perfecting appeal was therefore September 13, 2006. Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). The

pro se notice of appeal was filed on December 21, 2006. Under the circumstances, we lack

jurisdiction to dispose of the purported appeal in any manner other than by dismissing it for want of

jurisdiction. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State,

918 S.W.2d 519, 522-23 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).
2

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: January 11, 2007

Do Not Publish
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5451 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

10926 Quality Drive in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Julius L. 

Chambers Civil Rights Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2018 

Ms. ADAMS (for herself, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. JONES, Mr. PRICE of North 

Carolina, Mr. WALKER, Mr. HUDSON, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. MCHENRY, 

and Mr. BUDD) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10926 Quality Drive in Charlotte, North Carolina, as the ‘‘Julius L. Chambers Civil Rights Memorial 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JULIUS L. CHAMBERS CIVIL RIGHTS MEMORIAL 

4 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 10926 Quality Drive in Char7 lotte, North Carolina, shall be known and designated as 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5451 IH

1 the ‘‘Julius L. Chambers Civil Rights Memorial Post Of2 fice Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Julius L. Chambers 

7 Civil Rights Memorial Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Harold Hartley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
InfoSpi, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of InfoSpi, Inc.


Date: 11/12/08                        By: /s/ Harold Hartley
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Harold Hartley
                                      Title: Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

HIAWATHA TIBBS,

Petitioner,

v. 3:10cv404-WS/EMT

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

October 19, 2010. See Doc. 11. The magistrate judge recommends that the

petitioner's petition for writ of error coram nobis be denied. The petitioner has filed no

objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

This court having determined that the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation should be adopted, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 11) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The petitioner's petition for writ of error coram nobis (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of November , 2010.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:10cv404-WS

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

INVESTORSHUB, COM, INC., etc.,

et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv9-RH/WCS

MINA MAR GROUP, INC., etc.,

et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER

The defendants’ unopposed motion, ECF No. 10, for leave to amend their

answer is GRANTED. The amended answer, ECF No. 10-1, is deemed filed this

date.

SO ORDERED on April 18, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 11 Filed 04/18/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DAVID RHODEN, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 1:11-cv-26-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion For 2-Day Extension Of Time To

File Memorandum Of Law. (Doc. 15.) Plaintiff requests an extension of time until July

20, 2011 to file his memorandum. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(B), Plaintiff’s counsel

certifies that Defendant’s counsel has been contacted and that Defendant does not

object to the requested relief. 

Accordingly, upon due consideration, Plaintiff’s Motion For 2-Day Extension Of

Time To File Memorandum Of Law (Doc. 15) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his

memorandum on or before July 20, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19 day of July, 2011. th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00026-MP-GRJ Document 16 Filed 07/19/11 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 28 (Monday, February 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 6517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-630]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 28 / Monday, February 12, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 6517]]

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS

Sunshine Act Meeting

Date and Time: Wednesday, February 14, 2007, 1:30-2 p.m.

Place: Middle East Broadcasting Networks, Inc., 7600 Boston Blvd., 
Suite D, Springfield, VA 22153.

Closed Meeting: The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors 
(BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of 
issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international 
broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and 
personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating 
to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This 
meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose 
matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the 
interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 
U.S.C. 52b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature 
disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate 
implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)). 
In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal 
personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International 
Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6)).

Contact Person for More Information: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Carol Booker at (202) 203-4545.

    Dated: February 7, 2007
Carol Booker,
Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-630 Filed 2-8-07; 10:57 am]
BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
```
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2354 

To direct the Director of the National Science Foundation to support research 

on opioid addiction, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2019 

Mr. COONS (for himself and Mr. GARDNER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Director of the National Science Foundation 

to support research on opioid addiction, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Expanding Findings for Federal Opioid Research and 

6 Treatment Act’’ or the ‘‘EFFORT Act’’. 

7 (b) FINDINGS.—The Congress finds that— 

8 (1) research gaps currently exist in the preven9 tion and treatment of opioid addiction; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2354 IS

1 (2) the National Science Foundation’s research 

2 on opioid addiction has increased understanding of 

3 the neuroscience of addiction, substance abuse inter4 vention, the role of illicit supply networks, the sec5 ondary effects on families, the use of technology to 

6 address the opioid epidemic, and options for alter7 native, non-addictive therapeutics for pain; and 

8 (3) the National Science Foundation and the 

9 National Institutes of Health have recognized that 

10 fundamental questions in basic, clinical, and 

11 translational research would benefit greatly from 

12 multidisciplinary approaches and collaboration. 

13 SEC. 2. NSF SUPPORT OF RESEARCH ON OPIOID ADDIC14 TION. 

15 The Director of the National Science Foundation, in 

16 consultation with the Director of the National Institutes 

17 of Health, shall support merit-reviewed and competitively 

18 awarded research on the science of opioid addiction. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                            
|2. | The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|Date: Feb 15, 2020 | By: | /s/ Saskya Bedoya        | 
|------------------ | --- | ------------------------ | 
|                   |     | Saskya Bedoya, President |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LEIKEISHA L. LEMON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:11cv214/RS-WCS

CHATTAHOOCHEE SECURITY

GUARDS and FRANKLIN COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Order and Report and Recommendation

(Doc. 12). Plaintiff has not filed objections.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and is

incorporated in this Order.

2. Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Doc. 8) is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted

and because the claims are barred by the statute of limitations.

3. The clerk is directed to note on the docket that this case was dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and to close the file.

 ORDERED on July 8, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00214-RS-WCS Document 13 Filed 07/08/11 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Real Goods Solar, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Schaeffer,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 10, 2011



/s/ John SchaefferJohn SchaefferPresident (principal executive
officer)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 249 (Monday, December 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 74288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6228]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL


Appraisal Subcommittee; Information Collection Submitted for OMB 
Review and Comment Request

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee, Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial 
Institutions Examination Council (``ASC'') will submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (``OMB'') for clearance the following information 
collection, without change from a previously approved collection.

DATES: Comments on this information collection must be received on or 
before January 30, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Marc L. Weinberg, Acting Executive Director 
and General Counsel, Appraisal Subcommittee, 2000 K Street, NW., Suite 
310, Washington, DC 20006; and Mark D. Menchik, Clearance Officer, 
Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10236, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marc L. Weinberg, Acting Executive 
Director and General Counsel, Appraisal Subcommittee, 2000 K NW., Suite 
310, Washington, DC 20006, from whom copies of the information 
collection and supporting documents are available.

Summary of Revision

    Title: Description of Office, Procedures, Public Information, 12 
CFR part 1102, subpart D.
    Type of Review: Regular submission.
    Description: The information collection enables the ASC to comply 
with the Freedom of Information Act, as amended, (``FOIA'' 5 U.S.C. 
552. It will be used by the ASC and its staff in determining whether 
requests for access to ASC records should be provided and whether 
appeals from adverse agency decisions regarding access should be 
granted under FOIA.
    Form Number: None.
    OMB Number: 3139-0004.
    Affected Public: All members of the public.
    Number of Respondents: 11 respondents.
    Total Annual Responses: 11 responses.
    Average Hours per Response: 20 minutes.
    Total Annual Burden Hours: 3.67 hours.

    By the Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial 
Institutions Examination Council.

    Dated: December 21, 2007.
Marc L. Weinberg,
Acting Executive Director & General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-6228 Filed 12-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-M
NUMBER 13-14-00258-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

THE CITY OF ALAMO, TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

PRO-MEDIC EMS, LLC, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on October 1, 2014, pending resolution of 

an issue with the final judgment. This cause is now before the Court on appellant’s 

unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds this interlocutory appeal is now moot 

and appellant elects to dismiss this appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss 

the appeal. Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed 

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and the appeal is 

hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) 

("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be 

entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

12th day of February, 2015.