alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4(a)

INSTRUMENT OF CORRECTION

This Instrument of Correction is entered into by Entergy Texas, Inc. ("ETI")and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C. ("EGSL") to correct a mutual mistakein the Debt Assumption Agreement entered into by ETI and the predecessor to EGSLon December 31, 2007 ("DAA"). All initially capitalized terms used herein thatare not defined herein shall have the meaning specified in the DAA.

WHEREAS, pursuant to the DAA, on December 31, 2007 ETI assumed theobligations of EGSL to pay to the Trustees the Assumed Amounts specified withrespect to each series of Outstanding Debt on Schedule 1 of the DAA and onSchedule 1 to each Instrument of Assumption executed on December 31, 2007;

WHEREAS, the Assumed Amounts in such Schedules 1 were calculated based on theSeptember 30, 2007 balance sheet of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. ("EGSI");

WHEREAS, it was the intention of the parties to the DAA that the DAA and theInstruments of Assumption would provide for the adjustment of ETI'sresponsibilities to pay the Assumed Debt based on the December 31, 2007 balancesheet of EGSI following the same methodology used to calculate the AssumedAmounts from the September 30, 2007 balance sheet of EGSI;

WHEREAS, by mutual mistake, neither the DAA nor the Instruments of Assumptionprovided for such adjustment; 

WHEREAS, EGSL and ETI desire to correct the DAA to reflect the intention ofthe parties on December 31, 2007;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:

The DAA is hereby corrected as of December 31, 2007 to require adjustment ofETI's obligations under the DAA to conform to the December 31, 2007 balancesheet of EGSI using the same methodology that was used to calculate the AssumedDebt. EGSL and ETI will make payments to the applicable Trustees in accordancewith the corrected DAA. Exhibit A describes the methodology used to calculateETI's obligations under the DAA, including the payment responsibilities of EGSLand ETI with respect to each series of Assumed Debt.

The execution of this instrument shall not affect the rights of the Trustees,the parishes or governmental entities that issued any of the Assumed PCRB Debtor the holders of the Assumed Debt to enforce the obligations of EGSL and ETI tothe Trustees as provided in the Instruments of Assumption if either EGSL or ETIfail to make the payments required by the corrected DAA.

This Instrument of Correction has been executed by the duly authorizedrepresentatives of the parties hereto.

Dated: March 20, 2008
# C_2010034EN.01000201.xml

| 11.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/2

---

Public holidays in 2010: EEA EFTA States and EEA institutions

2010/C 34/02

| 2010 | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway | EFTA Surveillance Authority | EFTA Court |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 January | X | X | X | X | X |
| 2 January | | X | | | |
| 6 January | | X | | | |
| 2 February | | X | | | |
| 19 March | | X | | | |
| 1 April | X | | X | | |
| 2 April | X | X | X | X | |
| 5 April | X | X | X | X | X |
| 22 April | X | | | | |
| 1 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 13 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 14 May | | | | X | |
| 17 May | | | X | | |
| 24 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 3 June | | X | | | |
| 17 June | X | | | | |
| 23 June | | | | | X |
| 2 August | X | | | | |
| 8 September | | X | | | |
| 1 November | | X | | X | X |
| 8 December | | X | | | |
| 25 December | X | X | X | X | X |
| 26 December | X | X | X | X | X |
| 31 December | | X | | | |

2010

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

EFTA Surveillance Authority

EFTA Court

1 January

X

X

X

X

X

2 January

X

6 January

X

2 February

X

19 March

X

1 April

X

X

2 April

X

X

X

X

5 April

X

X

X

X

X

22 April

X

1 May

X

X

X

X

X

13 May

X

X

X

X

X

14 May

X

17 May

X

24 May

X

X

X

X

X

3 June

X

17 June

X

23 June

X

2 August

X

8 September

X

1 November

X

X

X

8 December

X

25 December

X

X

X

X

X

26 December

X

X

X

X

X

31 December

X

---
## NO. 12-08-00254-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTR ICT

TYLER, TEXA S
CHRI STO PH ER BEA N, § APP EAL FRO

M T HE T HIR D APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRI CT COURT OF TH E ST ATEOFTEX

AS, APP ELL EE § AN DE RSON C OU

NT Y, TEX

AS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM This appea l is being dismi ssed for w ant of jurisdiction. Appellant wa s convicted of the offe nse of aggra vated assault with a deadly we apon, and punishment wa s imposed in open court on April 9, 2008. Consequently, Appellant’s notice of appe al was dueon May 9, 2008. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26. 2(a) (2)
. How e ve r, Ap pe llant f ile d h is n oti c e of

app e a l onJu ne 9, 20 08 . T hu s, Appellant’s notice of appe al is untimely, which leave s us without jurisdi ction over the appeal. On June 12, 2008, this c ourt notified Appellant that the information rec eived in this appe al does not show the jurisdiction of this c ourt in that the notice of appeal is unti mely and ther e wa s no timel y m o t ion for an e xtension of time to file the notice of appeal as permitted by Te xas Rule of Appellat e Pr o c e d u r e 2 6
. 3
. A p p e ll a n t w a s f u rth e r in f o r me dth a t th e ap p e a l w o u ldb e d is mi s sed unless, on or bef

ore June 23, 2008, the i nformation was amende d to show this court's jurisdiction. Ap pe llant r e sp on de d to thec ou rt 's Ju ne 12 , 2 00 8 n ot ice , bu t di d not s a tis fy its c on c e rn s a bo ut i ts jurisdiction. Furthermore, this court ha s no authority to al l o w t h e l at e filing of a noticeof appe al exce pt as provided by Rule 26.3. See Sla ton v . St ate , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (p e r c uria m) ; Ol

iv o v . St ate , 9 18 S.W .2 d 5 19 , 5 23 (T e x. Crim. Ap p. 19 96 ). Con se qu e ntl y, thi s2

app e a l is dismiss ed for want of jurisdiction
. Opinion delivere d June 25, 2008. P an el consi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(DO N OT PUBLISH)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LOUIS REED, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.5:10-cv-264-MW/CJK

MICHAEL D. CREWS,

Respondent.

________________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION

The Court has considered the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation, 

ECF No. 70, filed March 7, 2013. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The Second Amended Petition 

for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice. A certificate of 

appealability is DENIED with prejudice.” The Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED on March 25, 2013.

s/Mark E. Walker

United States District Judge
# C_2010320EN.01000201.xml

| 25.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 November 2010

2010/C 320/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3339 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,28 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4548 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84380 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2923 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3276 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1445 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,688 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7094 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9743 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3060 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9755 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3632 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3556 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3485 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7546 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7476 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 532,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4755 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8762 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4110 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 959,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1881 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,800 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,8130 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,076 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3070 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5844 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,9700 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3339

JPY

Japanese yen

111,28

DKK

Danish krone

7,4548

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84380

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2923

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3276

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1445

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,688

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7094

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9743

RON

Romanian leu

4,3060

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9755

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3632

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3556

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3485

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7546

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7476

KRW

South Korean won

1 532,62

ZAR

South African rand

9,4755

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8762

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4110

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 959,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1881

PHP

Philippine peso

58,800

RUB

Russian rouble

41,8130

THB

Thai baht

40,076

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3070

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5844

INR

Indian rupee

60,9700

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RYAN THOMAS, STEVEN DAVIS,

TIFANIE MOSELEY, and RUBEN VAUGHN

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00226-SPM-GRJ

PRODUCERS AGRICULTURE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiffs’ Motion For Extension Of Time To

File Response To Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, Motion To

Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiffs request a fourteen (14)

day extension of time until January 19, 2011 to respond to Defendant’s Motion To

Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings (Doc. 10). 

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(B), Plaintiffs represent that Defendant’s counsel has been

contacted and does not object to the relief requested.

Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiffs’ Motion For Extension Of Time To File Response To Defendant’s

Motion To Dismiss Or, In The Alternative, Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay

Proceedings (Doc. 12) is GRANTED. 

(2) Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss Or, In The
Page 2 of 2

Alternative, Motion To Compel Arbitration And Stay Proceedings (Doc. 10) on or before

January 19, 2011.

 DONE AND ORDERED this 3 day of January, 2011. rd

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00226-SPM -GRJ
# C_2011091EN.01001401.xml

| 23.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/14

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2011/C 91/04

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Republic of San Marino

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Republic of San Marino

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), the Member States of the euro area and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national side features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Republic of San Marino

Subject of commemoration: The 500th anniversary of the birth of the Italian painter Giorgio Vasari (30 July 1511-27 June 1574). Vasari was also a writer, historian and architect, famous for his biographies of Italian artists, and he is now considered the ideological founder of art-historical writing.

Description of the design: The inner part of the coin shows a detail from the painting ‘Judith and Holofernes’ by Giorgio Vasari. At the bottom are the dates ‘1511-2011’, with ‘G. Vasari’ and the mint mark ‘R’ on the left. On the right are the inscriptions ‘San Marino’ and ‘C.M.’, the initials of the mint maker Claudia Momoni.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 130 000 coins

Date of issue: June 2011

---

(1)  For other national faces of euro coins intended for circulation, see http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/cash/coins/index_en.htm

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IVAN RENE MOORE, 

Appellant, 

 v. 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; ASSET 

RELIANCE, INC.; CRAIG HANSEN; 

EDWARD D. TESTO; GEORGE 

BARBOUR; KIMBERLY MARTINBRAGG; THOMASINA REED; LAW 

OFFICE OF THOMASINA REED; ALLEN 

KING; LAW OFFICE OF ALLEN KING; 

DOES, 1 through 50, 

Appellees.

No. 21-55121 

D.C. No. 2:20-cv-05733-FMO 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 17, 2022**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Moore’s request for oral 

argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. 

FILED

MAY 27 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 21-55121

Chapter 7 debtor Ivan Rene Moore appeals pro se from the district court’s 

judgment dismissing his bankruptcy appeal for failure to prosecute. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d) and 1291. We review for an abuse of 

discretion. Ash v. Cvetkov, 739 F.2d 493, 495 (9th Cir. 1984). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Moore’s appeal 

after Moore failed to file the documents required by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy 

Procedure 8009 in a timely manner. See Fed. Bankr. R. 8003(a)(2) (an appellant’s 

failure to take steps required to prosecute an appeal, other than the timely filing of 

a notice of appeal, may be grounds for sanctions, including dismissal); Pagtalunan 

v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 640-43 (9th Cir. 2002) (discussing factors to be 

considered before dismissing a case for failure to prosecute; a district court’s 

dismissal should not be disturbed absent “a definite and firm conviction” that it 

“committed a clear error of judgment” (citations and internal quotation marks 

omitted)); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1261 (9th Cir. 1992) (this court may 

review the record independently if the district court does not make explicit findings 

to show its consideration of the factors).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments or allegations raised for the first time on appeal. 

See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-116930, 333-107525, 333-90045, 333-77943, 333-33038, 333-39396, 333-67692, 333-70334, 333-135076 and 333-145280) of Autobytel Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2006relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Irvine, CA 

March 12, 2008
# C_2011172EN.01001501.xml

| 11.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6209 — PAI/Kiloutou)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 172/04

On 1 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6209. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6209. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011240EN.01000801.xml

| 18.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 August 2011

2011/C 240/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4477 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4499 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87760 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1685 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1402 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7985 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,430 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1338 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2466 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5566 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3687 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4167 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2802 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7264 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7391 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 547,43 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2735 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2466 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4610 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 329,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3040 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,448 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,4744 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,243 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2880 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5897 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,6800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4477

JPY

Japanese yen

110,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4499

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87760

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1685

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1402

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7985

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,430

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1338

RON

Romanian leu

4,2466

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5566

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3687

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4167

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2802

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7264

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7391

KRW

South Korean won

1 547,43

ZAR

South African rand

10,2735

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2466

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4610

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 329,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3040

PHP

Philippine peso

61,448

RUB

Russian rouble

41,4744

THB

Thai baht

43,243

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2880

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5897

INR

Indian rupee

65,6800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WILLIAM NORKUNAS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00064-MP-GRJ

THIRTY-NINTH AVENUE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 19, Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File

Answer. The motion is granted, and Defendant shall have until August 15, 2011, to respond to

the complaint.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of July, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00064-MP-GRJ Document 20 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RONALD M. MAXEY,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-106-RS-GRJ

SECRETARY, FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15)

and Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. 16). I have considered Petitioner’s objections de 

novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved 

and incorporated in this Order.

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 10) is GRANTED. 

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED 

with prejudice as untimely.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on July 23, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00106-RS-GRJ Document 17 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 1