alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNICARE LIFE & HEALTH

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:11-cv-61-SPM/GRJ

CONNIE GALVAN and CHERYL

ANN MORGAN,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 10). Defendants have been

afforded an opportunity to file objections. No objections were filed. Upon

consideration, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation is correct

and should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 10) is

adopted and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion For Default Judgment Against

Defendant Connie Galvan And Motion To Deposit Funds And Be

Case 1:11-cv-00061-SPM-GRJ Document 11 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 3
Discharged From Case (Doc. 8) is GRANTED.

4. The Clerk is hereby directed to enter a default judgment against

Connie Galvan foreclosing any claim she may have to the

remaining proceeds to be deposited into the Court’s registry.

5. Unicare is hereby ordered to deposit the remaining proceeds of

$22,000.00, plus any applicable interest, into the Court’s registry

within fourteen (14) days of the date of the Court’s Order adopting

this report and recommendation.

6. The Defendants, Connie Galvan and Cheryl Ann Morgan, their

officers, agents, servants, and attorneys and those in active

concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the

Court’s Order are hereby enjoined from instituting any action or

actions in any court against Unicare arising out of or relating to any

claim or claims with respect to the rights to and proceeds under

group policy no. GI-17-GCC, which insured the Decedent, Terry

Morgan.

7. Unicare is fully and finally discharged from all further liability as to

any and all claims for the remaining proceeds under group policy

no. GI-17-GCC and interest thereon and is dismissed from this

action upon depositing the remaining proceeds of $22,000.00, plus

applicable interest, into the Court’s registry.

-2-

Case 1:11-cv-00061-SPM-GRJ Document 11 Filed 12/15/11 Page 2 of 3
8. The Clerk is hereby directed to disburse the remaining proceeds of

$22,000.00, plus applicable interest, to Defendant Cheryl Ann

Morgan after the funds are deposited into the Court’s registry and

upon the filing of a motion by Defendant Cheryl Ann Morgan

requesting disbursement to her of the funds in the Court’s registry.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2011.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

-3-

Case 1:11-cv-00061-SPM-GRJ Document 11 Filed 12/15/11 Page 3 of 3
[No. 1735.]

#### L. C. VAN RIPER, and JOSEPH H. HUTCHINSON, Appellants, *v.*CHARLES H. BOTSFORD, et al., Respondents.

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Esmeralda County; *Frank P. Langan,*Judge.

Action by L. C. Van Riper and Joseph H. Hutchinson against Charles H. Botsford, and Frank P. Langan, District Judge.. From an order- setting aside a default, plaintiffs appeal.

Dismissed.

The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

*Letch, Oarney & Stevens,*for Appellants.

*Rail, Thayer & Steele,*and *C. L. Harwood,*for Respondents.

By the Court,

Sweeney, J.:

Upon the authority of, and for the reasons stated in, the opinion rendered in the case entitled *Charles H. Botsford, Relator,*v. *Frank P. Langan, District Judge of the First Judicial District, State of Nevada, Respondent*(29 Nev. 459, 91 Pac. 737), the motion to dismiss the appeal in the present case is hereby granted.
# C_2011082EN.01000101.xml

| 16.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 March 2011

2011/C 82/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3884 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,39 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4587 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86740 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9790 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2756 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9140 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,394 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,04 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7069 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0584 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1808 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2034 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4105 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3779 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8267 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9086 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7844 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 577,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7478 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1255 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3835 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 254,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2596 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,818 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,1025 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,291 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3259 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7628 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,8200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3884

JPY

Japanese yen

112,39

DKK

Danish krone

7,4587

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86740

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9790

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2756

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9140

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,394

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,04

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7069

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0584

RON

Romanian leu

4,1808

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2034

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4105

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3779

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8267

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9086

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7844

KRW

South Korean won

1 577,24

ZAR

South African rand

9,7478

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1255

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3835

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 254,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2596

PHP

Philippine peso

60,818

RUB

Russian rouble

40,1025

THB

Thai baht

42,291

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3259

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7628

INR

Indian rupee

62,8200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 1 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 2 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 3 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 4 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 5 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 6 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 7 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 8 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 9 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 10 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 11 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 12 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 13 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 14 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 15 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 16 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 17 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 18 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 19 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 20 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 21 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 22 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 23 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 24 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 25 of 26
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 26 of 26
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RBC BANK (USA), a North Carolina

banking corporation,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-204-RS-EMT

JAMES D. HOLSOMBAKE,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested in Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment 

(Doc. 25) is GRANTED. Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7(C)(1), “[f]ailure to file a 

responsive memorandum may be sufficient cause to grant the motion.” No 

response was filed in this case. 

ORDERED on December 28, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00204-RS-EMT Document 28 Filed 12/28/11 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21.1

We currently conduct some of our operations through four wholly owned-subsidiaries and one partially owned subsidiary. The following chart provides some
information about those subsidiaries:

Name and Headquarters

Place of
FormationChemotrade GmbH
Dusseldorf, Germany

GermanyIUT Detection Technologies, Inc.

Colorado, USAIsonics Homeland Security and
Defense Corporation

Delaware, USAIsonics Vancouver, Inc.

Washington, USAProtection Plus Security
Consultants, Inc.

New York, USAInstitut fur
Umwelttechnologien GmbH

GermanyInterpro Zinc, LLC*

Colorado


---



Each
of the subsidiaries does business under its own name.



QuickLinks
# C_2010140EN.01002401.xml

| 29.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 140/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 140/24

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 May 2010

2010/C 140/08

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2384 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,06 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4411 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84995 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6580 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4258 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9615 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,780 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7080 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0615 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1646 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9299 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4534 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2954 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6470 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8165 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7312 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 479,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4046 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4599 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2665 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 387,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0781 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,118 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 37,9200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,328 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2492 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,8205 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 57,4347 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2384

JPY

Japanese yen

113,06

DKK

Danish krone

7,4411

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84995

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6580

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4258

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9615

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,780

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7080

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0615

RON

Romanian leu

4,1646

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9299

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4534

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2954

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6470

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8165

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7312

KRW

South Korean won

1 479,69

ZAR

South African rand

9,4046

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4599

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2665

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 387,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0781

PHP

Philippine peso

57,118

RUB

Russian rouble

37,9200

THB

Thai baht

40,328

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2492

MXN

Mexican peso

15,8205

INR

Indian rupee

57,4347

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5400 

To prohibit the Secretary of Education and the Attorney General from encouraging certain policies or agreements between elementary and secondary 

schools and local law enforcement agencies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2018 

Mr. GROTHMAN (for himself, Mr. ROKITA, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. DESANTIS, Mr. 

CONAWAY, Ms. STEFANIK, Mr. PERRY, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. KING

of Iowa, Mr. FLORES, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. SANFORD, and 

Mr. GOSAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Education and the Attorney 

General from encouraging certain policies or agreements 

between elementary and secondary schools and local law 

enforcement agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Make Schools Safe 

5 Again Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5400 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN POLICIES OR AGREE2 MENTS WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES. 

3 Neither the Secretary of Education nor the Attorney 

4 General shall authorize or otherwise encourage a State 

5 educational agency, local educational agency, or an ele6 mentary school or secondary school to have a policy or 

7 agreement with local law enforcement agencies to not refer 

8 a student suspected of committing any criminal activity 

9 (including a misdemeanor or felony under State or Federal 

10 law) to such an agency. 

11 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

12 In this Act, the terms ‘‘elementary school’’, ‘‘local 

13 educational agency’’, ‘‘secondary school’’, and ‘‘State edu14 cational agency’’ have the meanings given the terms in 

15 section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education 

16 Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801). 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

EUGENE LONG,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv365/RV/EMT

T.M. REYES, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated November 2, 2010 (Doc. 6). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

3. The plaintiff is hereby warned that false responses or representations in the future may

result in more severe and long term sanctions.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of December, 2010.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2011045EN.01000401.xml

| 12.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 February 2011

2011/C 45/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3524 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,01 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4566 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84570 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8022 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3163 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9300 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,250 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,67 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7040 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9193 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2583 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1575 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3544 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3464 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5411 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7869 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7358 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 525,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8878 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,9164 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4110 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 107,49 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1413 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,354 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,6880 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,722 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2586 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3513 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,7880 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3524

JPY

Japanese yen

113,01

DKK

Danish krone

7,4566

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84570

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8022

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3163

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9300

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,250

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,67

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7040

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9193

RON

Romanian leu

4,2583

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1575

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3544

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3464

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5411

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7869

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7358

KRW

South Korean won

1 525,88

ZAR

South African rand

9,8878

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,9164

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4110

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 107,49

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1413

PHP

Philippine peso

59,354

RUB

Russian rouble

39,6880

THB

Thai baht

41,722

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2586

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3513

INR

Indian rupee

61,7880

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5323 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5323

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
    to establish an exemption from the credit valuation adjustment 
 calculation for uncleared derivatives transactions with end-users so 
   that United States companies are not disadvantaged, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2018

 Mr. Davidson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 
    to establish an exemption from the credit valuation adjustment 
 calculation for uncleared derivatives transactions with end-users so 
   that United States companies are not disadvantaged, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Derivatives Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. CREDIT VALUATION ADJUSTMENT RELIEF.

    (a) In General.--The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer 
Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5361 et seq.), is amended by inserting after 
section 176 the following new section:

``SEC. 177. CREDIT VALUATION ADJUSTMENT.

    ``Prudential risk-based capital requirements and generally 
applicable risk-based capital requirements established by the 
appropriate Federal banking agencies shall not apply a fair value 
adjustment to reflect counterparty credit risk in valuation of over-
the-counter derivative contracts with respect to transactions with a 
counterparty that--
            ``(1) is described under section 2(h)(7)(A) of the 
        Commodity Exchange Act;
            ``(2) is a person or class of persons that meets any 
        qualifications required by a regulation issued by the Commodity 
        Futures Trading Commission with respect to such person or class 
        of persons qualifying for an exemption under section 4(c)(1) of 
        the Commodity Exchange Act from the requirements of section 
        2(h)(1)(A) of such Act; or
            ``(3) is an affiliate that meets the requirements for an 
        exception under section 2(h)(7)(D) of the Commodity Exchange 
        Act.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents in section 1(b) of 
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 
U.S.C. 5301 note) is amended by inserting after the item relating to 
section 176 the following new item:

``Sec. 177. Credit valuation adjustment.''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

NYKA O’CONNOR,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv354/MCR/MD

SECURITY OFFICER GRACE, et al.,

Defendants.

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon plaintiff filing a civil rights complaint under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff has neither paid the $350.00 filing fee nor applied for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff’s case cannot proceed until he either pays the

filing fee or files a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. A complete

application includes a motion with supporting affidavit, a prisoner consent form and a

financial certificate with account attachments (a printout of the transactions in plaintiff’s

inmate trust account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the

complaint). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk is directed to send plaintiff a form application for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on the form.

2. Within twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall either

pay the $350.00 filing fee in full, or file a complete application for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed for

failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2010.

/s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
#### Frank K. Robinson, Appellant, *v.*Esther A. Avery et al., Respondents.

*Robinson*v. *Anery,*182 App. Div. 912, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted October 7, 1918;

decided October 15, 1918.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 30, Í918, *unanimously*affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to foreclose a mortgage. . .

The motion was made upon the ground that an appeal *619did not lie as of right to the Court of Appeals and that permission to appeal had not been obtained.

*Glenn W. Fox*for motion.

*Frank Miller*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-22-00292-CR

David CASTILLO, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 365th Judicial District Court, Zavala County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-01-003847-ZCRAJA

Honorable Amado J. Abascal III, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED August 9, 2023.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice