alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Matter of the Marriage of Allan Ray Comstock and 

Mindy Lee Comstock 

Appellate case number: 01-19-00722-CV

Trial court case number: 15-FD-3019

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County

Appellant, Mindy Lee Comstock, has filed an unopposed motion for leave to file a 

supplement to her appellant’s brief. Appellant timely filed her brief on April 1, 2020. On 

July 2, 2020, a supplemental reporter’s record was filed. According to appellant’s motion, 

there are two trial court hearing transcripts which were not included in the originally filed 

reporter’s record, available at the time appellant submitted her brief. Appellant has 

requested that this Court allow her to file a supplement to her appellant’s brief to make 

certain clarifications to factual assertions included in her appellant’s brief. 

Appellant’s unopposed motion to file a supplement to her appellant’s brief is 

granted, and the “Supplement to Appellant’s Brief” filed by appellant on July 29, 2020 

shall be considered accepted and filed as of that date.

Appellee’s deadline to file his appellee’s brief is August 3, 2020. Because we grant 

appellant’s motion to file a supplement to her appellant’s brief, we also extend appellee’s 

deadline to file his appellee’s brief for a period of 14 days. Accordingly, appellee’s brief 

is due to be filed on or before August 17, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes____________

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __August 4, 2020____
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JEREMY GODWIN,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 5:10cv291/RH/CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause was filed by plaintiff, through counsel, on November 10, 2010. 

Plaintiff has now filed a motion to dismiss complaint (doc. 17) asking for dismissal

of his complaint. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That plaintiff’s motion to dismiss complaint (doc. 17) be granted, that this case

be dismissed without prejudice, and the clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida this 30th day of June, 2011.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00291-RH-CJK Document 18 Filed 06/30/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon the magistrate judge and all

other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual

findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 5:10cv291/RH/CJK

Case 5:10-cv-00291-RH-CJK Document 18 Filed 06/30/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SYLVIA SHARP,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv374-RH/WCS

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS 

et al., 

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 26. No objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is dismissed

without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) for failing to exhaust

administrative remedies.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on June 7, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00374-RH-WCS Document 27 Filed 06/08/11 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 72681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Board of Regents of the Uniformed Services University of the 
Health Sciences

AGENCY: Department of Defense; Uniformed Services University of the 
Health Sciences (USU)

ACTION: Quarterly meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the Federaql Advisory Committee Act of 
1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended) and the Sunshine in the 
Government Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended) announcement of the 
following meeting:

Name of Committee: Board of Regents of the Uniformed Services 
University of the Health Sciences.

Date of Meeting: Tuesday, February 5, 2008.

Location: Board of Regents Conference Room (D3001), Uniformed Services 
University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20814.

Times: 8 a.m. to 12 noon.

Proposed Agenda: The actions that will take place include the approval 
of minutes from the Board of Regents Meeting held November 6, 2007; 
acceptance of administrative reports; approval of faculty appointments 
and promotions; and the awarding of post-baccalaureate masters and 
doctoral degrees in the biomedical sciences and public health. The 
President, USU; Dean, USU School of Medicine; Acting Dean, USU Graduate 
School of Nursing; Commander, USU Brigade; and the Associate Dean, 
Graduate Medical Education, will also present reports. These actions 
are necessary for the University to remain an accredited medical school 
and to pursue its mission, which is to provide outstanding health care 
practitioners and scientists to the uniformed services.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Federal statute and regulations 
(5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended, and 41 CFR 102-3.140 through 102-3.165) and 
the availability of space, this meeting is open to the public. 
Interested persons may submit a written statement for consideration by 
the Board of Regents. Individuals submitting a written statement must 
submit their statement to the Designated Federal Officer at the address 
detailed above. If such statement is not received at least 10 calendar 
days prior to the meeting, it may not be provided to or considered by 
the Board of Regents until its next open meeting. The Designated 
Federal Officer will review all timely submissions with the Board of 
Regents Chair and ensure such submissions are provided to Board of 
Regents Members before the meeting. After reviewing the written 
comments, submitters may be invited to orally present their issues 
during the February 2008 meeting or at a future meeting.

For Further Information and Base Access Procedures Contact: Janet S. 
Taylor, Designated Federal Officer.

    Dated: December 18, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 07-6178 Filed 12-19-07; 12:06 pm
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
#### THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent, *v.*JOHN R. DARLING, Appellant.

Manner, of Carrying up alleged Errors on Appeal. Alleged errors in a charge or instruction can only be brought to the attention of the Supreme Court in one of three ways: either by being embodied in a bill of exceptions, or in a settled statement, or endorsed by the judge as provided by Section 42G of the Practice Act; and unless presented in one of these ways, the Supreme Court will not notice them.

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, Storey County.

The defendant was indicted in June, 1866, for the crime of robbery committed against Patrick McCauley, at Virginia City, on May 25, 1866; and upon his trial was convicted, and afterwards sentenced to imprisonment at hard labor in the State Prison for the term of fourteen years.

The appeal was taken from the judgment. The transcript contained what purported tó have been the charge of the Court below to the jury; but there was nothing to authenticate it except the endorsement of the clerk that it had been filed, and the certificate of the clerk to the transcript that it contained among other things full and correct copies of the *“*Instructions of Court ” in the cause on file in his office.

*Aldrich and De Long*and *David L. Bailey,*for Appellant,

urged that the defendant had been put upon his trial without proper preparation, and defended solely by counsel appointed by the Court, and that so little attention had been paid to the case that no bill of exceptions or statement had been made. They claimed, however, that there were flagrant errors in the charge of the Court below to the jury, and that a new trial should be awarded on account of them.

*Robert M. Clarice,*Attorney General, for Respondent.

There is nothing to show that the instructions contained in the record were ever given by the Court below to the jury. They are *414authenticated not at all; neither marked “ given,” signed or endorsed by the Judge, nor contained in a bill of exceptions or statement.

*“*The appellate Court will not reverse alleged errors in instructions of the Court, unless embodied in a bill of exceptions, or there is an endorsement thereon signed by the Judge, showing the action of the Court thereon.” (Practice Act, Sec. 426; *People*v. *Thompson,*28 Cal. 215.)

By the Court,

Lewis, C. J.

The errors assigned in this ease are confined to what is claimed to be the charge given by the Court below to the jury. But this Court has no authentic information that such charge was in fact given, as it is not embodied in a bill of exceptions, settled statement, nor endorsed by the Judge as required by Section 426 of the Practice Act. Errors in the charge or instructions can only be brought to the attention of the appellate Court in one of these ways.

No error which this Court can notice appearing in the record, the judgment must be affirmed.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5238 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1234 Saint Johns Place in Brooklyn, New York, as the ‘‘Major Robert 

Odell Owens Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2018 

Ms. CLARKE of New York (for herself, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. KING of New York, 

Mr. SUOZZI, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MENG, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. JEFFRIES, Mr. NADLER, Mr. DONOVAN, Mrs. CAROLYN

B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. 

SERRANO, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of 

New York, Mr. FASO, Mr. TONKO, Ms. STEFANIK, Ms. TENNEY, Mr. 

REED, Mr. KATKO, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, and Mr. 

COLLINS of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1234 Saint Johns Place in Brooklyn, New 

York, as the ‘‘Major Robert Odell Owens Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAJOR ROBERT ODELL OWENS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1234 Saint Johns Place in 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5238 IH

1 Brooklyn, New York, shall be known and designated as 

2 the ‘‘Major Robert Odell Owens Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Major Robert Odell 

7 Owens Post Office’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5475 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 108 North Macon Street in Bevier, Missouri, 

as the ‘‘SO2 Navy SEAL Adam Olin Smith Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5475 EH

1 SECTION 1. SO2 NAVY SEAL ADAM OLIN SMITH POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 108 North Macon Street in 

5 Bevier, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘SO2 Navy SEAL Adam Olin Smith Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘SO2 Navy SEAL 

11 Adam Olin Smith Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5475 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOlin Smith Post Office’’. Bevier, Missouri, as the ‘‘SO2 Navy SEAL Adam al Service located at 108 North Macon Street in
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

THEODORE CHAIRES,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00167-MP -WCS

LARRY CAMPBELL, STATE OF FLORIDA,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 5, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, which recommends that plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim

upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Plaintiff has not

objected to the recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it

is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 5, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint, Doc. 1, is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of June, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00167-MP-WCS Document 6 Filed 06/01/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011124EN.01000901.xml

| 27.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 124/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124/9

---

Special Report No 2/2011 ‘Follow-up of Special Report No 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office?’

2011/C 124/05

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 2/2011 ‘Follow-up of Special Report No 1/2005 concerning the management of the European Anti-Fraud Office?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of B.P. and B.P., children, * From the 35th District Court

 of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. CV2001036.

No. 11-21-00156-CV * September 9, 2021

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal and 

concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5439 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5439

   To provide for a single point of contact at the Internal Revenue 
   Service for the taxpayers who are victims of tax-related identity 
                                 theft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2018

   Mr. Renacci (for himself and Mr. Lewis of Georgia) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for a single point of contact at the Internal Revenue 
   Service for the taxpayers who are victims of tax-related identity 
                                 theft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT FOR TAX-RELATED IDENTITY THEFT 
              VICTIMS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Treasury (or the Secretary's 
delegate) shall establish and implement procedures to ensure that any 
taxpayer whose return has been delayed or otherwise adversely affected 
due to tax-related identity theft has a single point of contact at the 
Internal Revenue Service throughout the processing of the taxpayer's 
case. The single point of contact shall track the taxpayer's case to 
completion and coordinate with other specialized units to resolve case 
issues as quickly as possible.
    (b) Single Point of Contact.--
            (1) In general.--For purposes of subsection (a), the single 
        point of contact shall consist of a team or subset of specially 
        trained employees who--
                    (A) have the ability to work across functions to 
                resolve the issues involved in the taxpayer's case; and
                    (B) shall be accountable for handling the case 
                until its resolution.
            (2) Team or subset.--The employees included within the team 
        or subset described in paragraph (1) may change as required to 
        meet the needs of the Internal Revenue Service, provided that 
        procedures have been established to--
                    (A) ensure continuity of records and case history; 
                and
                    (B) notify the taxpayer when appropriate.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 73033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6160]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel, MTA Followup.
    Date: January 16, 2008.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: David I. Sommers, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute 
of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, 6001 Executive 
Blvd., Room 6154, MSC 9609, Bethesda, MD 20892-9606, 301-443-7861, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c687f636161697e7f4c616d656022626564226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99fdeaf6f4f4fcebead9f4f8f0f5b7f7f0f1b7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.242, 
Mental Health Research Grants; 93.281; Scientist Development Award, 
Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, and Research Scientist 
Award; 93.282, Mental Health National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 17, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-6160 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2011180EN.01002501.xml

| 21.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/25

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — EAC/13/11

European Policy Network on the Implementation of Key Competences in School Education

2011/C 180/15

1.   Objectives and description

Objectives and description

The overall aim of this call is to establish a Europe-wide network of relevant organisations in countries participating in the Lifelong Learning Programme. The aim of the network is to develop policy advice for the implementation of the 2006 Recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning in schools. It should address the issues raised by the November 2009 Communication ‘Key Competences for a Changing World’ (1) and stimulate high-level cooperation between Member States’ policymakers responsible for the essential areas of school development.

1

The network should therefore bring together those organisations, researchers and stakeholder groups whose area of interest and expertise is on school curriculum development, teacher education, assessment and evaluation, learning support and any other area that is seen as crucial for the development of a coherent policy for the promotion of key competences.

The network should examine and bring forward recommendations on what policies can help schools better ensure that all students develop the key competences as set out by the above mentioned Recommendation.

2.   Eligible applicants

Eligible applicants

This call for proposal is open to ministries of education and other public bodies, such as those responsible for curricula, teacher education, assessment and evaluation, research centres and universities, foundations and associations with legal personality and a registered office in one of the countries taking part in the Lifelong Learning Programme (2).

2

3.   Budget and duration

Budget and duration

The framework agreement will last from 2012 until 2014.

The total budget earmarked for the co-financing of this network amounts to EUR 500 000 for 2012. Financial assistance from the Commission cannot exceed 75 % of the total eligible costs.

The maximum duration of projects is 36 months.

4.   Deadline

Deadline

Applications must be sent to the Commission no later than 30 September 2011.

30 September 2011.

5.   Further information

Further information

The full text of this call for proposals and the application forms are available in English on the following website:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/calls/index_en.html

Applications must comply with the requirements set out in the full text and be submitted using the form provided.

---

(1)  COM(2009) 640 final.

1

(2)  Decision No 1720/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 establishing an action programme in the field of lifelong learning.

2

---