alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010030EN.01001301.xml

| 6.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 February 2010

2010/C 30/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3691 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4449 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87325 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2405 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4682 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2195 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,185 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,10 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7087 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0875 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1435 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0785 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5822 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4698 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6395 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9862 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9475 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 601,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5544 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3470 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3200 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 938,22 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7152 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,750 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,7350 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,468 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5758 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0367 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,0700 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3691

JPY

Japanese yen

122,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4449

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87325

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2405

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4682

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2195

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,185

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,10

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7087

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0875

RON

Romanian leu

4,1435

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0785

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5822

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4698

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6395

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9862

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9475

KRW

South Korean won

1 601,26

ZAR

South African rand

10,5544

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3470

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3200

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 938,22

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7152

PHP

Philippine peso

63,750

RUB

Russian rouble

41,7350

THB

Thai baht

45,468

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5758

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0367

INR

Indian rupee

64,0700

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
NUMBER 13-19-00626-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

JOSE LUIS GARCIA JR., Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 398th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant's third motion for extension of time to 

file the brief. Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on June 3, 2020, and appellant 

was previously granted two extensions.

The Court, having fully examined and considered appellant's third motion for 

extension of time to file the brief and the extensions previously granted in this cause, is 
2

of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, appellant's third motion for extension of time 

to file the brief should be granted with order. The Court looks with disfavor upon the delay 

caused by counsel's failure to have filed a brief in this matter and further motions for 

extension of time will not be granted absent exigent circumstances.

Appellant's third motion for extension of time to file the brief is hereby GRANTED

in part and DENIED in part, and the Honorable O. Rene Flores, counsel for 

appellant, is hereby ORDERED to file the appellate brief with this Court on or 

before February 1, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

23rd day of December, 2020.
# CA2011208EN.01000101.xml

| 14.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 208/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 208/1

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION

EPSO/AD/188/10 (GRADE AD 5)

| — | INTERPRETERS FOR BULGARIAN (BG) |
| --- | --- |

—

INTERPRETERS FOR BULGARIAN (BG)

| — | ENGLISH-LANGUAGE (EN) INTERPRETERS |
| --- | --- |

—

ENGLISH-LANGUAGE (EN) INTERPRETERS

| — | DUTCH-LANGUAGE (NL) INTERPRETERS |
| --- | --- |

—

DUTCH-LANGUAGE (NL) INTERPRETERS

| — | INTERPRETERS FOR ROMANIAN (RO) |
| --- | --- |

—

INTERPRETERS FOR ROMANIAN (RO)

| — | INTERPRETERS FOR SLOVENIAN (SL) |
| --- | --- |

—

INTERPRETERS FOR SLOVENIAN (SL)

(2011/C 208 A/01)

| ANGELOVA | Temenouga |
| --- | --- |
| ASHCROFT HEMPSALL | Susan |
| BOSTAN | Ioana |
| DANEELS | Inne |
| DIMCHEVA | Krasmira |
| DRAGANOVA-TCHORBANOVA | Ekaterina |
| FIREA | Cristina |
| FRIJLINK | Jan Ferdinand Daniël |
| GAFTEA | Gabriela |
| HART | Emma Louise |
| ILCHEVA | Elena |
| JAKHEL | Ziva |
| JAYES | Thomas |
| KOLEVSKA | Denitsa |
| KUIPERS | Anne Maria |
| MANOV | Andrey |
| MARINOVA-VASSILEVA | Maya |
| PACHITANU | Irina-Roxana |
| POPA | Madalina Maria |
| SADOC | Latifa |
| SHOPOVA | Hristina |
| SIJS | Margo Annic Maria |
| SMREKAR | Gasper |
| STANEV | Ilko |
| STOEVA | Dimka |
| TEHOVA GRIGOROVA | Ada |
| TINDON | Jose Armando |
| TODASCA | Oana-Andreea |
| TUDORAS | Anca |
| VAN HAUWERMEIREN | Tim |
| WEINMANN | Iulia Angela |
| ZAITZEVA | Vesselina |

ANGELOVA

Temenouga

ASHCROFT HEMPSALL

Susan

BOSTAN

Ioana

DANEELS

Inne

DIMCHEVA

Krasmira

DRAGANOVA-TCHORBANOVA

Ekaterina

FIREA

Cristina

FRIJLINK

Jan Ferdinand Daniël

GAFTEA

Gabriela

HART

Emma Louise

ILCHEVA

Elena

JAKHEL

Ziva

JAYES

Thomas

KOLEVSKA

Denitsa

KUIPERS

Anne Maria

MANOV

Andrey

MARINOVA-VASSILEVA

Maya

PACHITANU

Irina-Roxana

POPA

Madalina Maria

SADOC

Latifa

SHOPOVA

Hristina

SIJS

Margo Annic Maria

SMREKAR

Gasper

STANEV

Ilko

STOEVA

Dimka

TEHOVA GRIGOROVA

Ada

TINDON

Jose Armando

TODASCA

Oana-Andreea

TUDORAS

Anca

VAN HAUWERMEIREN

Tim

WEINMANN

Iulia Angela

ZAITZEVA

Vesselina

The reserve list will be valid until 13 May 2012 and may be extended.

13 May 2012

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00207-SPM-GRJ

DAVID MORGAN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is a letter from Defendant Bernard Ravelo (Doc. 17),

which the Court construes as a motion for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s

Complaint. (Doc. 1.) Mr. Ravelo requests an extension of time to file an answer to the

complaint so that he will have more time to seek legal counsel regarding this case. Mr.

Ravelo also requests a similar extension to file an answer on behalf of Defendants

Holleman’s Restaurant & Lounge, Inc., Hume Enterprises, LLC and Rod Seafood, Inc. 

Because Mr. Ravelo is not an attorney, he cannot represent or appear on behalf

of any other Defendant, including a corporation or other juridical entity. Specifically with

regard to corporations and other business entities they do not have a right to represent

themselves in court. Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11 Cir. th

1985)(“The rule is well established that a corporation is an artificial entity that can act

only through agents, cannot appear pro se, and must be represented by counsel.”).

Accordingly, Defendant Bernard Ravelo’s request for an extension of time to

respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 17) is GRANTED only as it applies to Bernard
Page 2 of 2

Ravelo and is DENIED to the extent that the request applies to Defendants Holleman’s

Restaurant & Lounge, Inc., Hume Enterprises, LLC and Rod Seafood, Inc. Defendant

Bernard Ravelo shall respond to the Complaint (Doc. 1) on or before March 30, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2011. 

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00207-SPM -GRJ
[No. 822.]

#### S. BUCKLEY, Appellant, *v.*ARMENIA BUCKLEY, Administratrix, etc., Respondent.

Cposs-Examination oi? Witness. — The testimony of a witness upon cross-examination should be confined to matters testified to upon his examination in chief.

Petition for rehearing.

This ease is reported in 12 Nev. 424.

*Lewis & Deal, W. Webster & W. L. Knox,*for Appellant.

*W. Gain,*for Respondent.

Response to petition for rehearing.

By the Court,

Leonard, J.:

After a careful re-examination of this case, we are satisfied that appellant is entitled to a new trial, and particularly on account of one error in the court below, to wit: In allowing witness Short on cross-examination by respondent, to testify that H. A. Buckley told him that he (Henry) had traded his sheep in California for his father’s sheep in this state. It was in no sense proper cross-examination, and it was certainly injurious to appellant’s case.

And although we are unable to *perceive*how the error in permitting Irwin J. Buckley to answer on cross-examination as to the value of the sheep left behind at the “ boneyard” was *injurious,*still it was error.

The petition for a modification of the judgment, and an affirmance as modified, must be and is denied.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Soy Energy, LLC (the
Company) for the quarter ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dallas Thompson,
Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

| |                                
| | -------------------------------
| | /s/ Dallas
 Thompson           
| |                                
| | Dallas
 Thompson, Treasurer and
| | Chief
 Financial Officer       
| |                                
| | Dated: March
 17, 2009         

---
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jesse Lucas Wilson, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00076

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 173rd District Court of Henderson County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR16

- 0937

- 173 ). Memorandum Opinion deli vered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify both of the trial court ’ s judgment s by deleting the

assessment s of $900.00 for attorney fees

. As modified, the judgment s of the trial court are
affirmed. We note that the appellant, Jesse Lucas Wilson, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DERRICK COX, SR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:11cv192/MCR/EMT

SHAWN THOMPSON, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 14, 2012 (doc. 33). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to serve

Defendants as instructed by the court. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of July, 2012.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00192-MCR-EMT Document 34 Filed 07/20/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ending December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Josh Levine, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and David Kestenbaum, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Josh Levine        
| | -----------------------
| | Josh Levine            
| | Chief Executive Officer
| |                        
| | /s/ David Kestenbaum   
| | David Kestenbaum       
| | Chief Financial Officer



Date: April 3, 2017
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 72367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6087]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, MIDARP.
    Date: January 10, 2008.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 11 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Nadine Rogers, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on 
Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, 
Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, 301-402-2105, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2e5c41494b5c5d401c6e40474a4f0040474600494158"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66140901031415085426080f020748080f0e48010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 11, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-6087 Filed 12-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# EUR-Lex - - EN

*|*

#

**Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6317 — BNP Paribas/Fortis Luxembourg-Vie) — Candidate case for simplified procedure Text with EEA relevance **

*
Official Journal C 243 , 20/08/2011 P. 0019 - 0019 *

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.6317 — BNP Paribas/Fortis Luxembourg-Vie)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 243/09

1. On 11 August 2011, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1], by which the undertaking Cardif Lux International SA, controlled by BNP Paribas Cardif of the BNP Paribas SA Group (all in France) acquires, within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation, control of the whole of Fortis Luxembourg-Vie SA (Luxembourg) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Cardif Lux International SA: life insurance products,

- Fortis Luxembourg-Vie SA: life insurance products.

3. On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation [2] it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4. The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6317 — BNP Paribas/Fortis Luxembourg-Vie, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "EC Merger Regulation").

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 ("Notice on a simplified procedure").

--------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SAM J. PEARSON, IV ,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv76/MCR/EMT

DARRELL McMANN, et al.,

 Defendants.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On February 23, 2011, this court

entered an order giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to pay the filing fee or submit a properly

completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 5). Plaintiff failed to respond to the order;

therefore, on March 30, 2011, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within

twenty-one (21) days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order

of the court (Doc. 6). The time for compliance with the show cause order has now elapsed, and

Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or submitted a properly completed motion to proceed in forma

pauperis.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 22nd day of April 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00076-MCR-EMT Document 7 Filed 04/22/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:11cv76/MCR/EMT

Case 3:11-cv-00076-MCR-EMT Document 7 Filed 04/22/11 Page 2 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 10-1484

DOWNING/SALT POND PARTNERS, L.P.,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on May 23, 2011, is amended

as follows.

On page 3, line 3, "well-plead" is deleted and replaced with

"well-pled".

On page 5, line 23, "cease and desist" is deleted and

replaced with "cease-and-desist".

On page 6, line 4, "cease and desist" is deleted and

replaced with "cease-and-desist".

On page 8, line 15, "Downing/Salt Pond Partners, 698 F.

Supp. 2d 278" is deleted and replaced with "Downing/Salt Pond

Partners, L.P. v. Rhode Island, 698 F. Supp. 2d 278 (D.R.I.

2010)".

On page 8, line 20, "F.Supp.2d" is deleted and replaced with

"F. Supp. 2d".

On page 28, line 11, "plaintiffs" is deleted and replaced

with "a plaintiff".