alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010053EN.01000701.xml

| 3.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/7

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

1,00 % on 1 March 2010

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

2 March 2010

2010/C 53/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3548 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4423 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90635 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7316 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4628 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0485 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,770 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9147 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1066 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0793 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4994 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4029 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5180 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9442 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9015 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 558,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2774 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2485 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2700 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 600,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5796 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,435 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,5145 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,346 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4253 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2100 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,2460 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3548

JPY

Japanese yen

120,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4423

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90635

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7316

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4628

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0485

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,770

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9147

RON

Romanian leu

4,1066

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0793

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4994

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4029

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5180

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9442

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9015

KRW

South Korean won

1 558,38

ZAR

South African rand

10,2774

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2485

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2700

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 600,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5796

PHP

Philippine peso

62,435

RUB

Russian rouble

40,5145

THB

Thai baht

44,346

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4253

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2100

INR

Indian rupee

62,2460

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ventrus Biosciences, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J. Barrett, Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.





/s/ David J. BarrettDavid J. BarrettChief Financial OfficerMay 16, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

 Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 3 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2007 Revision, published July 2, 2007, at 72 FR 36192.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The underwriting limitation for Swiss Reinsurance America Corporation, which was listed in the Treasury Department Circular 570, published on July 2, 2007, is hereby amended to read $364,914,000. Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Department Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2007 Revision, to reflect this change.

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*

Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: October 31, 2007.

Vivian L. Cooper,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.

[FR Doc. 07-5640 Filed 11-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

HENRY JAMES WIMBERLY,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv301/RS-MD

NORTHWEST FLORIDA RECEPTION

CENTER ANNEX; HOLMES

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION;

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION;

M. E. VARNUM; and WARDEN, NORTHWEST

FLORIDA RECEPTION CENTER ANNEX;

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17) and

Plaintiff’s Motion For Reconcideration [Sic] (Doc. 25). I have considered Plaintiff’‘s

objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim because of Plaintiff’s failure to

exhaust his administrative remedies.

3. Plaintiff’s Motion For Appointment Of Counsel (Doc. 3) is denied.

4. Plaintiff’s Motion For Injunctive Relief (Doc. 4) is denied.
5. Plaintiff’s Motion For Emergency Order (Doc. 5) is denied.

6. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on January 28, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2010131EN.01000101.xml

| 20.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5812 — Société Lyonnaise des Eaux/Sociétés de distribution d'eau et d'assainissement (II))

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 131/01

On 18 March 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5812. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5812. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 2 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 3 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 4 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 5 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 6 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 7 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 8 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 9 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 10 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 11 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00152-RS-EMT Document 38 Filed 06/02/11 Page 12 of 12
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 246 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 246

   To block the implementation of certain presidential actions that 
 restrict individuals from certain countries from entering the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 2019

Mr. Murphy (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mrs. Murray, Ms. Harris, Mrs. 
    Gillibrand, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Markey, Mr. Coons, Ms. Warren, Mr. 
Whitehouse, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Duckworth, Mr. Carper, Mr. 
   Udall, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Bennet, Mr. 
Cardin, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Booker, Mr. Reed, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
 Brown, Ms. Klobuchar, and Ms. Hassan) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To block the implementation of certain presidential actions that 
 restrict individuals from certain countries from entering the United 
                                States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that Executive Order 13780 and the presidential 
proclamation issued on September 24, 2017--
            (1) contravene the intent of Congress in enacting section 
        202(a)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
        1152(a)(1)), which states, ``no person shall receive any 
        preference or priority or be discriminated against in the 
        issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person's race, 
        sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence''; and
            (2) violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment 
        to the United States Constitution and the equal protection 
        component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to 
        the United States Constitution.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FUNDS.

    No funds, resources, or fees made available to the Secretary of 
Homeland Security, or to any other official of a Federal agency by any 
Act of Congress for any fiscal year, may be used to implement or 
enforce--
            (1) Executive Order 13780, signed on March 6, 2017; or
            (2) Presidential Proclamation 9645, issued on September 24, 
        2017.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1996 COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BODY BILT SEATING INC. AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          56,499
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,013,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,696,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,995,379
<PP&E>                                       2,967,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                 541,957
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,486,949
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,302,321
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,438,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,486,949
<SALES>                                     17,578,210
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,578,210
<CGS>                                        9,325,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,002,350
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,498
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             139,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,433,929
<INCOME-TAX>                                    56,677
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,377,252
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,377,252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KURTIS ROY JETER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-18-RS-CJK

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16). 

The Report and Recommendation recommends that the action be dismissed 

without prejudice because of Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an order of the 

court, namely an order requiring plaintiff to file a printout of the transactions in his 

inmate trust account for the period December 31, 2011, to May 16, 2012. (Doc. 

14). Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the order would result in a 

recommendation that this case be dismissed. To date, Plaintiff has not complied 

with the order, and has not responded to the Court’s June 26, 2012, order (Doc. 15) 

requiring him to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, nor the Court’s 

August 23, 2012, order (Doc. 19) giving Plaintiff an extension of time to show 

cause because of his recent change of address. 

Case 5:11-cv-00018-RS-CJK Document 20 Filed 09/19/12 Page 1 of 2
IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court.

2. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on September 19, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00018-RS-CJK Document 20 Filed 09/19/12 Page 2 of 2
GK INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual Report of GK Intelligent  Systems,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary F.
Kimmons,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and Chief  Financial  Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: March 25, 2003                   /S/ Gary F. Kimmons
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        By: Gary F. Kimmons
                                        Its: President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sungro Minerals Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Mal Bains, President and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 

| Date: October 15, 2008
 
/s/ Mal Bains
 
 
Mal Bains		President and Treasurer 		(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
 

[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sungro Minerals Inc. and will be retained by Sungro Minerals Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.] |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ANTHONY EVANS

vs

C.O. OATES, et al.

Case No. 3:11cv103/RV/CJK

ORDER

Plaintiff’s MOTION TO DISTRICT JUDGE REQUESTING THAT A

RECONSIDERATION BE MADE ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL WHICH HAS BEEN DENIED BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE and

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, received on May 17, 2011,were

referred to the undersigned with the following deficiencies:

The documents do not have proper signature blocks. The typed or

printed name and address (including the inmate identification number)

of the party filing the document must be included in the signature block.

An original signature must be affixed to any document which is filed in

paper form. N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.1(B)(5).

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

The submitted hard copies of the documents shall be returned to you by

the Clerk without electronic filing. They may be resubmitted after the

above noted deficiencies are corrected.

DONE and ORDERED this 20th day of May 2011.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00103-RV -CJK Document 17 Filed 05/20/11 Page 1 of 1
SCEC-24-0000545

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

________________________________________________________________

KHISTINA DEJEAN, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

STATE OF HAWAIʻI, OFFICE OF ELECTIONS; 

and SCOTT NAGO, Chief Election Officer, State of Hawaiʻi,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

On August 9, 2024, Plaintiff Khistina DeJean’s “Motion To 

Have Paper Ballots” was filed with this court as an election 

contest. DeJean seeks permission “to be a write in” candidate 

for President and Vice President in the general election

(complaint). Here, because no election results are challenged 

the complaint fails to state a claim as an election contest 

under Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes (HRS) § 11-172 (Supp. 2021). In 

addition, to the extent the complaint could be construed as a 

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCEC-24-0000545

12-AUG-2024

11:28 AM

Dkt. 4 ORD
2

petition seeking mandamus relief, the petition is denied because 

DeJean failed to establish a clear and indisputable right to the 

relief requested and a lack of other means to redress adequately 

the alleged wrong or to obtain the requested action. See Womble

Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 

1154, 1166 (2023); see also HRS § 12-2 (Supp. 2011) (“No person 

shall be a candidate for any general or special general election 

unless the person has been nominated in the immediately 

preceding primary or special primary.”); Burdick v. Takushi, 504 

U.S. 428 (1992) (reviewing Hawaiʻi’s elections laws and upholding

the write-in voting prohibition).

Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, August 12, 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

SHARLEEN M. RELLICK-SMITH,

Petitioner

v.

BETTY J. RELLICK AND KIMBERLY V. 

VASIL,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 119 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all 

remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:

a. Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the Trial Court’s decision to 

allow the Respondents to file an amended answer to include the 

[affirmative] defense that the action was barred by the statute of limitations 

due to the issue having already been determined to be waived by the Trial 

Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHARLES LEE McCOY,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09cv281/RS-MD

WARDEN KENNY ATKINSON,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) and

Petitioner’s A Motion Of Objection (Doc. 10). I have considered Petitioner’s objections

de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and is

incorporated in this Order.

2. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. §2241

(Doc. 1) is denied.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

 ORDERED on September 22, 2009.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE