alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00011-MP-GRJ-1

RAUL PAGAN RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 84, Motion to Continue Change of Plea by Raul

Pagan Rodriguez. The parties have been unable to come to an agreement concerning the

Statement of Facts, primarily due to the language barrier between the Defendant and his counsel. 

As such, defendant requests the Court continue his change of plea hearing until October 26,

2011. The government does not oppose the requested relief. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant’s motion to continue change of plea hearing, Doc. 84, is GRANTED.

2. The change of plea hearing is CONTINUED until Wednesday, October 26, 2011

at 11:00 a.m.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00011-MP-GRJ Document 85 Filed 10/12/11 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Jesse Lucas Wilson, Appellant

No. 06-19-00076-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 173rd District Court of 

Henderson County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

CR16-0937-173). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Justice Stevens, Chief Justice 

Morriss and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify both of the trial court’s judgments by deleting the 

assessments of $900.00 for attorney fees. As modified, the judgments of the trial court are

affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Jesse Lucas Wilson, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 30, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EX-10.22



 Exhibit 10.22 

Civitas Therapeutics, Inc. 

September 12, 2014 
 Dear Bob: 

This letter confirms the termination of the Consulting Agreement dated December 16, 2011, as amended January 1, 2013 (the “Consulting
Agreement”), regarding your service as a member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Civitas Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”). Accordingly, pursuant to Section 7.3(b) of the Consulting Agreement and effective as of
the day immediately preceding the day on which the initial public offering of the Company’s common stock is consummated, the Company hereby terminates the Consulting Agreement and, by signing below, you hereby acknowledge and agree to such
termination of the Consulting Agreement. Upon termination of the Consulting Agreement, you shall be entitled to compensation as a member of the Board pursuant to the Company’s non-employee director compensation policies, as in effect from time
to time. For the avoidance of doubt, the terms of sections 1, 5, 6 and 8 of the Consulting Agreement shall survive its termination and the termination of the Consulting Agreement will not terminate your service as a member of the Board. 

 

			
	 Sincerely,

	
	 Civitas Therapeutics, Inc.

	
	  /s/ Mark Iwicki
	 Name:
	 	Mark Iwicki
	 Title:
	 	President and Chief Executive Officer


  

	
	Acknowledged and Agreed
	
	  /s/ Robert Roche
	Robert Roche
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNDERWRITERS OF LLOYDS OF

LONDON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:11cv175/RS-CJK

THOMAS L. McKINNIE and UNITED

STATES OF AMERICA, acting through

its agency, THE INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Motion For Remand (Doc. 5).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion For Remand is denied.

2. Plaintiff is directed to deposit the contested policy proceeds into the registry

of this court not later than May 26, 2011. Upon making that deposit, Plaintiff

is discharged.

ORDERED on May 12, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00175-RS-CJK Document 7 Filed 05/12/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2010277EN.01000201.xml

| 14.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 October 2010

2010/C 277/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3958 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4565 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88120 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2662 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3352 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1350 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,470 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7095 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9545 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2773 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9723 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4128 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3999 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8317 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8407 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8181 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 564,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5766 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3018 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3308 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 461,72 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3172 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,733 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,0055 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,790 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3240 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2900 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,0800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3958

JPY

Japanese yen

114,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4565

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88120

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2662

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3352

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1350

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,470

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7095

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9545

RON

Romanian leu

4,2773

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9723

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4128

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3999

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8317

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8407

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8181

KRW

South Korean won

1 564,83

ZAR

South African rand

9,5766

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3018

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3308

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 461,72

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3172

PHP

Philippine peso

60,733

RUB

Russian rouble

42,0055

THB

Thai baht

41,790

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3240

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2900

INR

Indian rupee

62,0800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 224

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I

No. CR-13-654

JAMES T. PIPER

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered April 9, 2014

APPEAL FROM THE DREW

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT 

[NO. CR-12-94]

HONORABLE SAM POPE, JUDGE

REMANDED TO SETTLE AND

SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD;

REBRIEFING ORDERED

DAVID M. GLOVER, Judge

James Piper was tried by a jury and found guilty of the offenses of breaking or entering,

theft of property, and theft by receiving. His sole point of appeal challenges only the

sufficiency of the evidence supporting the breaking-or-entering conviction. We remand to

the circuit court to settle and supplement the record, and, once that has been done, we direct

Piper to file a substituted abstract, brief, and addendum.

Piper was Mirandized and then interviewed at the Monticello Police Department by

Greg Johnson. In his statement, among other things, Piper denied breaking or entering into

the victim’s car and taking her purse, claiming instead that he found it in a dumpster near his

residence. The interview was recorded on a DVD. During Johnson’s testimony at trial, the

State introduced the DVD as an exhibit, and it was shown to the jury. In moving for a

directed verdict, Piper referenced his recorded statement.
Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 224

Although the recorded interview was admitted into evidence and shown to the jury,

there is no transcript of the taped statement in the record. Moreover, while the digital

recording is attached to the record with other exhibits, it is not included in the addendum.

Arkansas Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 4(a) imposes upon the trial court

a duty to require that a verbatim record be made of all proceedings pertaining to any

contested matter before the court or the jury unless the parties waive that requirement on the

record. See also Patton v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 131. We have not been directed to such a

waiver in the record to explain the failure to provide a transcript. 

We therefore remand this case to the circuit court for it to settle the record by

requiring that a verbatim transcription be made of the custodial statement that was played for

the jury at trial and to supplement the record with the addition of this transcription within

thirty (30) days of this opinion. Patton, supra. 

Once that has been done, we direct Piper to file a substituted abstract, brief, and

addendum that incorporates both the transcript of the custodial statement and the DVD of the

statement as required by Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i), and to do so within

fifteen (15) days after the supplemental record has been filed with this court.

Remanded to settle and supplement the record; rebriefing ordered.

PITTMAN and VAUGHT, JJ., agree. 

Gary W. Potts, for appellant.

Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Brad Newman, Ass’t Att’y Gen., and Drew Aylesworth,

Law Student Admitted to Practice Pursuant to Rule XV of the Rules Governing Admission

to the Bar of the Supreme Court under the supervision of Darnisa Evans Johnson, Deputy Att’y

Gen., for appellee.

2
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.3

                         FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP, INC.

                  CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS

         In my role as a senior financial officer of FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP,
INC., I agree that I will adhere to and advocate the following principles and
responsibilities governing my professional and ethical conduct. To the best of
my knowledge and ability, I will:

1.       act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts
of interest between personal and professional relationships;

2.       provide constituents with information that is accurate, complete,
objective, relevant, timely and understandable;

3.       comply with rules and regulations of federal, state and local
governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies;

4.       act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and
diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing my independent
judgment to be subordinated;

5.       respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of my
work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose;

6.       share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to my
constituents' needs;

7.       proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among
peers in my work environment; and

8.       responsibly use and control all assets and resources employed or
entrusted to me.

_______________________________            ______________________________
[Signature]                                [Date]
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 35 (Thursday, February 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-823]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, March 23, 2007.

Place:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

 Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-823 Filed 2-20-07; 11:34 am]
BILLING CODE 61351-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 36 (Friday, February 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-812]



[[Page 8164]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Quality Workgroup 
Meeting

ACTION:  Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 6th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Quality Workgroup in accordance with the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

DATES: March 27, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will continue its discussion 
on how health information technology can provide the data needed for 
the development of quality measures that are useful to patients and 
others in the health care industry, automate the measurement and 
reporting of a comprehensive current and future set of quality 
measures, and accelerate the use of clinical decision support that can 
improve performance on those quality measures.
    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional 
information, go to: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/quality/quality_instruct.html.

    Dated: February 12, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-812 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

USMAN KHAN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-415

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed August 23, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, 

Judge.

Alex R. Stavrou, Tampa, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Linsey SimsBohnenstiehl, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, ATKINSON, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

900 

CAF 12-01218 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF ALAZAYA I.B., JAVONTE W.G., 

MAREYAH A.B. AND NORMAN J.B. 

----------------------------------------------- 

JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ORDER

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

MATTHEW J.B., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

DEBORAH R. GARDINER, WATERTOWN, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

ASHLEY N. LYON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, ADAMS. 

LISA WELDON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, WATERTOWN.

SCOTT A. OTIS, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, WATERTOWN.

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Jefferson County

(Richard V. Hunt, J.), entered May 25, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant

to Family Court Act article 10. The order, among other things,

adjudged that respondent neglected the subject children. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
exh10-1_3274942.htm


EXHIBIT 10.1




 


AMENDMENT NO. 7


TO


SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED


CINEDIGM CORP. 2000 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN







AMENDMENT NO. 7, dated as of September 16, 2014 (this “Amendment”), to the Second Amended and Restated 2000 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Plan”) of Cinedigm Corp. (f/k/a Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corp. and f/k/a Access Integrated Technologies, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”).


 


WHEREAS, the Corporation maintains the Plan, effective as of June 1, 2000; and


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Corporation deems it to be in the best interest of the Corporation and its stockholders to amend the Plan in order to increase the maximum number of shares of the Corporation’s Class A Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, which may be issued and sold under the Plan from 9,300,000 shares to 14,300,000 shares.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.           The first sentence of Section 5.2 shall be revised and amended to read as follows:


 


“The total number of shares of Stock (including Restricted Stock, if any) optioned or granted under this Plan during the term of the Plan shall not exceed 14,300,000 shares.”


 


2.           This Amendment shall be effective as of the date first set forth above.


 


3.           In all respects not amended, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed and remains in full force and effect.


 


 


 


 











	 	 	
CINEDIGM CORP.


 


 


 


	 	 	
By: 

	/s/ Christopher J. McGurk
	 	 	
Name:

	
Christopher J. McGurk


	 	 	
Title:

	
Chairman & CEO
Exhibit 10.13


 


Summary Translation of Agreement with
Harbin Ding Xin Trading Co., Ltd.


 


Contract term: 2011-01-01 till 2011-12-31;
can be renewed with written consent; Zhejiang Tantech Bamboo Technology Co., Ltd (“Company”) can terminate the Agreement
giving Harbin Ding Xin Trading Co., Ltd. (“Supplier”) 30 days’ notice.


 


Price:
the purchase price is fixed within the first 12 months of the Agreement; both parties have the right to negotiate price after the
initial 12-month period.


 


Both parties agree that the annual cost reduction
is 5%; the Supplier will supply the products on time, ideally 100% on time; the product packaging shall meet the Company’s
requirements; Before the 20th day of each month, the Supplier will provide the account clearing list in written form
to the Company and the Company shall confirm within 5 days upon receipt for the Supplier to invoice; the Supplier is fully responsible
for the quality of the products; cost of returning of goods and related issues are the full responsibility of the Supplier; if
there are any changes in the design of the products, the Supplier shall provide written information to the Company of such changes;
any design, tools, patterns, molds, documents, standard, drawings of the products, etc. provided by the Company is considered confidential
and cannot be shared with any third party.
#### STATE v. LEONHARDT

No. 219 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 405.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 16 July 1979.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5435 

To require Federal agencies to allocate grant funding to States and localities 

based on the number of United States citizens and legal residents as 

determined under the decennial census, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2018 

Mr. MESSER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require Federal agencies to allocate grant funding to 

States and localities based on the number of United 

States citizens and legal residents as determined under 

the decennial census, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Funding Americans 

5 First Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALLOCATION OF GRANT FUNDING. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, the Director of the Office of Management and 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5435 IH

1 Budget shall direct the head of each agency to use, as 

2 appropriate, the number of citizens and legal permanent 

3 residents residing in a State or political subdivision of a 

4 State, as determined under a decennial census of popu5 lation under section 141 of title 13, United States Code, 

6 (beginning with the 2020 decennial census) when deter7 mining funding for the following: 

8 (1) Block grants. 

9 (2) Categorical grants. 

10 (3) Any other funding measures determined by 

11 the Director if the specific measure is calculated 

12 using the total population of a State or political sub13 division of a State. 

14 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

15 (1) AGENCY.—The term ‘‘agency’’ has the 

16 meaning given that term in section 551 of title 5, 

17 United States Code. 

18 (2) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means each of 

19 the several States, the District of Columbia, each 

20 territory or possession of the United States, and 

21 each federally recognized Indian Tribe. 

22 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on 

23 October 1, 2021. 

Æ 


khammond on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
# C_2010317EN.01000401.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/4

---

Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 104b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice

2010/C 317/07

At its meeting on 28 September 2010, the Court of Justice designated the First Chamber of the Court as the Chamber which, in accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 9(1) of the Rules of Procedure, is responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 104b of the Rules of Procedure, for a period of one year expiring on 6 October 2011.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILLIE JAMES MITCHUM, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv273-MP-WCS

A. KIRKLAND and

DR. BLANKENSHIP,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated November 30, 2011. (Doc. 30). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. Except as noted in the footnote below, the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.1

2. Defendant Kirkland’s motion to dismiss (doc. 26) is GRANTED.

 On page 3 of the Report and Recommendation, the magistrate judge states that “Plaintiff failed to

1

submit any other grievance appeals concerning those issues, but instead, initiated this civil rights action on

June 3, 2011.” This is incorrect. Plaintiff attached copies of two informal grievances to his complaint.

Case 4:11-cv-00273-MP-WCS Document 32 Filed 01/05/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. Plaintiff's complaint (doc. 1) is DISMISSED for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997(e) and for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 4:11cv273-MP-WCS

Case 4:11-cv-00273-MP-WCS Document 32 Filed 01/05/12 Page 2 of 2