alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011200EN.01S00301.xml

| 8.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/s3

---

NOTICE

On 8 July 2011, in Official Journal of the European Union C 200 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — fourth supplement to the 29th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
# C_2010146EN.01002401.xml

| 4.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/24

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 June 2010

2010/C 146/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2268 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,74 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4413 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83570 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5210 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4149 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8660 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,750 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7085 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0705 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1900 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9317 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4469 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2734 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5586 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7896 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7223 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 469,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3434 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3768 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2620 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 276,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0061 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,846 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 37,9828 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,969 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2262 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,6245 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 57,2550 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2268

JPY

Japanese yen

113,74

DKK

Danish krone

7,4413

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83570

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5210

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4149

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8660

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,750

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7085

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0705

RON

Romanian leu

4,1900

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9317

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4469

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2734

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5586

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7896

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7223

KRW

South Korean won

1 469,46

ZAR

South African rand

9,3434

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3768

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2620

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 276,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0061

PHP

Philippine peso

56,846

RUB

Russian rouble

37,9828

THB

Thai baht

39,969

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2262

MXN

Mexican peso

15,6245

INR

Indian rupee

57,2550

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2431 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to promulgate regulations requiring voice service providers to provide consumers opt-out callblocking programs by default and free of charge. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2019 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to promulgate regulations requiring voice service providers to 

provide consumers opt-out call-blocking programs by default and free of charge. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Unwanted Calls 

5 for All Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CALL-BLOCKING PROGRAMS. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2431 IS

1 (1) CALL-BLOCKING PROGRAM.—The term 

2 ‘‘call-blocking program’’ means a call-blocking pro3 gram described in the Declaratory Ruling in the 

4 matter of Advanced Methods to Target and Elimi5 nate Unlawful Robocalls, adopted by the Commis6 sion on June 6, 2019 (FCC 19–51; CG Docket No. 

7 17–59). 

8 (2) COMMISSION.—The term ‘‘Commission’’ 

9 means the Federal Communications Commission. 

10 (b) REGULATIONS.— 

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

12 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commis13 sion shall promulgate regulations to require voice 

14 service providers to provide consumers opt-out call15 blocking programs by default and free of charge. 

16 (2) DELAYED IMPLEMENTATION FOR SMALL

17 AND RURAL PROVIDERS.—The Commission shall 

18 delay by 1 year the applicability of the regulations 

19 promulgated under paragraph (1) to small voice 

20 service providers and rural voice service providers, as 

21 defined by the Commission. 

22 (3) EXEMPTED CALLS.—The Commission, in 

23 consultation with voice service providers, shall en24 sure that the call-blocking programs required under 

25 the regulations promulgated under paragraph (1) do 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2431 IS

1 not block calls that are exempted from the prohibi2 tions under section 227 of the Communications Act 

3 of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Steven M. Payne                                 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Steven      M. Payne                                |
|   | President                                           |
|   |                                                |
|   | /s/ Jerome I. Feldman                               |
|   | Jerome      I. Feldman                              |
|   | Chairman,      Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer |

----
# C_2012181EN.01020301.xml

| 21.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/203 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/203

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations’

COM(2012) 8 final — 2012/007 (COD)

2012/C 181/39

On 2 February 2012 the European Parliament and on 8 March 2012 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 114 and Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations

Proposal for Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations

COM(2012) 8 final — 2012/007 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CES 330/97, adopted on 20 March 1997 (1), it decided, at its 479th plenary session of 28 and 29 March 2012 (meeting of 28 March 2012), by 166 votes to 2 with 9 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.

1

Brussels, 28 March 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---

(1)  ESC opinion on the Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive concerning the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous preparations, OJ C 158/1997, page 76, 26 May 1997.

1

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Tri-Mark MFG, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Barry Sytner
                                 ----------------------
                                 Barry Sytner
                                 Chief Executive Officer

August 24, 2009


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Tri-Mark MFG, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/Betty Soumekh
                                 ----------------------
                                 Betty Soumekh
                                 Chief Financial Officer

August 24, 2009
Case 3:09-cv-00373-MCR-EMT     Document 4      Filed 10/01/2009     Page 1 of 8

Case 3:09-cv-00373-MCR-EMT     Document 4      Filed 10/01/2009     Page 2 of 8

Case 3:09-cv-00373-MCR-EMT     Document 4      Filed 10/01/2009     Page 3 of 8

Case 3:09-cv-00373-MCR-EMT     Document 4      Filed 10/01/2009     Page 4 of 8

Case 3:09-cv-00373-MCR-EMT     Document 4      Filed 10/01/2009     Page 5 of 8

Case 3:09-cv-00373-MCR-EMT     Document 4      Filed 10/01/2009     Page 6 of 8

Case 3:09-cv-00373-MCR-EMT     Document 4      Filed 10/01/2009     Page 7 of 8

Case 3:09-cv-00373-MCR-EMT     Document 4      Filed 10/01/2009     Page 8 of 8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED UNDER ITEM AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          46,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                       125
<INVENTORY>                                      8,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,283
<PP&E>                                          13,698
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,339
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           177
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,268
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,043
<SALES>                                         66,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                66,444
<CGS>                                           29,949
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,531
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,437
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,930
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,930
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DAVID F. ROBINSON, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-140/RS-CJK

NURSE SCARBOROUGH, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated 

by reference in this Order. 

2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

ORDERED on October 4, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00140-RS-CJK Document 11 Filed 10/04/11 Page 1 of 1
| 1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 , fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report for the period ending June 30, 2012 , fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Onteco Corporation |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 20, 2012                                           |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                            |   |
| /s/ Dror Svorai                                                 |   |
| Dror SvoraiChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |   |
NIOSH Respiratory Protective Device 

Information

NIOSH CA 2023-1053

April 2023

 

Clarification of label information for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus 

that are approved by NIOSH and certified to the National Fire Protection 

Association (NFPA) 1981 standard, 2019 Edition. 
Document Number

NIOSH CA 2023-1053

Page 2 of 3

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) issues this notice to clarify date 

information on the label for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBAs) that are approved by NIOSH 

and certified to the 2019 edition of NFPA 1981: Standard on Open-Circuit Self-Contained Breathing 

Apparatus for Emergency Services. This standard is listed on the NFPA website and on the standard’s 

cover as the 2019 edition. NIOSH approval and Safety Equipment Institute (SEI) NFPA certification 

documentation and SCBA product labels refer to the same standard as the 2018 edition. 

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: 

This NFPA 1981 standard was drafted in September 2018, but the cover and title page were given a 

2019 date during the NFPA editorial and publishing process. Chapter 5 of NFPA 1981 provides the 

required wording for labels applied to compliant SCBAs (shown below). However, because of the 

discrepancy between when the standard was completed and when it was published, the required 

labeling lists the edition as 2018, while the cover of the published standard shows the edition as 2019. 

To be compliant with the specific labeling provisions of NFPA 1981, SCBAs approved and certified to

this edition of NFPA 1981 standard are referred to as the 2018 edition in the NIOSH approval letter and 

SEI certification documentation as follows:

THIS SCBA MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF

NFPA 1981, STANDARD ON OPEN-CIRCUIT

SELF-CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS (SCBA)

FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES, 2018 EDITION.

DO NOT REMOVE THIS LABEL

Clarification of label information for Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus that are 

approved by NIOSH and certified to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 

1981 standard, 2019 Edition. 
Document Number

NIOSH CA 2023-1053

Page 3 of 3

REFERENCES:

Approval of Respiratory Protective Devices, 42 C.F.R. Part 84

NFPA 1970: Standard on Protective Ensembles for Structural and Proximity Firefighting, Work Apparel 

and Open-Circuit Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for Emergency Services, and Personal 

Alert Safety Systems (PASS)

NFPA 1971: Standard on Protective Ensembles for Structural Fire Fighting and Proximity Fire Fighting

NFPA 1975: Standard on Emergency Services Work Apparel

NFPA 1981: Standard on Open-Circuit Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) for Emergency 

Services

NFPA 1982: Standard on Personal Alert Safety Systems (PASS)
#### Terry Martin Cloud *v.*Mamie Selbe Cloud

(No. 13999)

Decided December 20, 1977.

*Rice, Hannis & Douglas, Charles F. Printz, Jr.,*for appellant.

*William Richard McCune, Jr.,*for appellee.

Per Curiam:

In this appeal appellant, Mamie Selbe Cloud, seeks reversal of a Berkeley County Circuit Court order transferring custody of appellant’s three-year-old daughter, Kathleen, to the child’s father, Terry Martin Cloud.

This Court has firmly subscribed to two propositions with reference to the custody of very young children: (1) the law favors the mother if she is a fit person, other things being equal, *Funkhouser v. Funkhouser, W.Va.,*216 S.E.2d 570 (1975); *Settle v. Settle,*117 W.Va. 476, 185 S.E. 859 (1936); and (2) where a change of custody is sought, a change in circumstances of the parties alone is *46not enough. It must be shown that such change would materially promote the welfare of the child. *Holstein v. Holstein,*152 W.Va. 119, 160 S.E.2d 177 (1968); *Pugh v. Pugh,*133 W.Va. 501, 56 S.E.2d 901 (1949).

The evidence adduced in the instant case demonstrated that, except for appellant’s poverty, the parties were substantially equally ñt and in equal posture to provide for the welfare of the three-year-old Kathleen. There was no evidence showing that change of custody would materially promote the welfare of the child. By ignoring the foregoing two principles and transferring custody of the child to the father, the Circuit Court of Berkeley County erred.

We, therefore, reverse and remand this case to the Circuit Court of Berkeley County with instructions that custody of Kathleen be vested in the mother.

*Reversed and remanded.*
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MYLES STOKES,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv284/RV/EMT

EDWIN G. BUSS,

Respondent.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated January 27, 2011 (Doc. 24). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order. The defendant previously filed a federal habeas corpus petition in this Court

in 1986 and another in 2009. Therefore, the present petition is his third attempt to challenge the

same conviction. Without the Eleventh Circuit’s authorization, there is no jurisdiction for this Court

to consider this filing.

2. This habeas action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of February, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHOUPIETE P. CASSEUS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-4-MP-GRJ

SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 9, Respondent’s second motion for an

extension of time to respond to the Petition due to counsel’s workload. Respondent

requests an extension of time up to and including July 28, 2011. 

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

1. That the motion, Doc. 9, is GRANTED. Respondent shall respond to the

Petition on or before July 28, 2011.

2. Petitioner shall have until August 29, 2011, to file a reply, if any.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14 day of June 2011. 

th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00004-MP-GRJ Document 10 Filed 06/14/11 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUMENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS**

 

We hereby consent to the use of the name Netherland,Sewell & Associates, Inc., and the use of information taken fromour reserve report for BPZ Resources, Inc. (d/b/a BPZ Energy, Inc.),dated February 29, 2008, with respect to the estimate of reserves andfuture revenue to the BPZ Energy, Inc. interest in certain oil and gasproperties located in Corvina Field, offshore Peru, as of December 31,2007, in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of BPZ Resources, Inc. tobe filed on or about August 28, 2008. We further consent to theincorporation by reference of information contained in our report as of December 31,2007, in the BPZ Resources, Inc. Registration Statement Nos. 333-116508,333-126388, 333-147461, and 333-147462 on Form S-8, and RegistrationStatement Nos. 333-126934 and 333-147463 on Form S-3, and any amendmentsto these Registration Statements.

 

 
|                 |   | Netherland,  Sewell & Associates, Inc. |
|-----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|            |   |                                            |
|            |   | By:                                             |  /s/ C. H.  (Scott) Rees III, P.E. |
|            |   |                                            |
|            |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer            |
|            |   |                                            |
|            |   |                                            |
| Dallas, Texas   |   |                                            |
| August 28, 2008 |   |                                            |

 

----