alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ADAPTIVE
MEDIAS, INC.



Exhibit
32.1



Certification

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections
(A) and (B) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,

United
States Code)



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), the undersigned officer of Adaptive Medias, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|Date:
    May 23, 2016 | /s/
    John B. Strong                                           
|---------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------
|                       | John
    B. Strong                                               
|                       | President
    and Chief Financial Officer                        
|                       | (Principal
    Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ROSALIND STUBBS,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:11cv160-WS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 11)

docketed October 7, 2011. The magistrate judge recommends that this case be

dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The plaintiff's complaint, and this action, are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to prosecute. 

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment, stating: "All claims are dismissed

without prejudice."

Case 4:11-cv-00160-WS-WCS Document 12 Filed 11/15/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of November , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00160-WS-WCS Document 12 Filed 11/15/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LEIKEISHA L. LEMON, 

 Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:11cv131/RS/CJK

CHATTAHOOCHEE SECURITY GUARDS, et al.,

 Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action by filing a civil rights

complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (doc. 1) and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

(doc. 2). Upon review of the complaint, it appears the proper venue for this action

lies in the Tallahassee Division of this court. 

Venue for actions under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is governed by 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b),

which provides:

A civil action wherein jurisdiction is not founded solely on diversity of

citizenship may, except as otherwise provided by law, be brought only

in (1) a judicial district where any defendant resides if all defendants

reside in the same State, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part

of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a

substantial part of property that isthe subject of the action is situated, or

(3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no

district in which the action may otherwise be brought. 

Case 4:11-cv-00214-RS-WCS Document 5 Filed 05/11/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Id. In the instant case, plaintiff is suing, inter alia, Jeffrey Lockley, who resides in

Franklin County (doc. 1). The events giving rise to plaintiff’s complaint occurred in

GadsdenCounty (doc. 1). These countieslie in the Tallahassee Division ofthis court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Pursuant to Local Rule 3.1(C), the Clerk shall transfer this case to the

Tallahassee Division of this District Court. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of May, 2011.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN

UNITEDSTATESMAGISTRATEJUDGE

Case No: 5:11cv131/RS/CJK

Case 4:11-cv-00214-RS-WCS Document 5 Filed 05/11/11 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6637

JAMES E. LANDRUM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

W. F. DALIUS, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-02-160-5-BO)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 22, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James E. Landrum, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James E. Landrum, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Landrum v. Dalius, No. CA-02-160-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed

Mar. 14, 2002; entered Mar. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2011038EN.01000101.xml

| 5.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/1

---

2011/C 38/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 30, 29.1.2011

OJ C 30, 29.1.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 13, 15.1.2011

OJ C 346, 18.12.2010

OJ C 328, 4.12.2010

OJ C 317, 20.11.2010

OJ C 301, 6.11.2010

OJ C 288, 23.10.2010

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# CA2010335EN.01000101.xml

| 11.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 335/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 335/1

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/117/08

PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATORS (AD 11)

in the field of fraud prevention

(2010/C 335 A/01)

Merit Group 1

| BAADER | Peter Michael Wolfgang |
| --- | --- |
| CRAGLIA | Massimo |
| HOULISTON | Lara |
| KROL | Jozef |
| PEREZ NAVARETE | Jose |

BAADER

Peter Michael Wolfgang

CRAGLIA

Massimo

HOULISTON

Lara

KROL

Jozef

PEREZ NAVARETE

Jose

Merit Group 2

| CASINI | Claudio |
| --- | --- |
| DE BEAUFORT | Christiaan Antonie |
| DIEZ GONZALEZ | Roman |
| JORGENSEN | Leif Hein |
| KADNER | Karlheinz |
| LUIK | Marge |
| REISS | Siegmar |
| SCHMIDT | Bernd-Andreas |
| VANBERGHEN | Patrick |
| WILLEMS | Tom |

CASINI

Claudio

DE BEAUFORT

Christiaan Antonie

DIEZ GONZALEZ

Roman

JORGENSEN

Leif Hein

KADNER

Karlheinz

LUIK

Marge

REISS

Siegmar

SCHMIDT

Bernd-Andreas

VANBERGHEN

Patrick

WILLEMS

Tom

Merit Group 3

| DI PROSPERO | Rita |
| --- | --- |
| JENSEN | Uffe Holst |
| JIMENO FERNANDEZ | Fructuoso |
| NARDI | Alessio |
| VAN HEUCKELHOM | Carlo |
| VENSKE | Lutz |

DI PROSPERO

Rita

JENSEN

Uffe Holst

JIMENO FERNANDEZ

Fructuoso

NARDI

Alessio

VAN HEUCKELHOM

Carlo

VENSKE

Lutz

The list will be valid until 31 December 2011 and may be extended.

31 December 2011

---

(1)  At a candidate's request, his/her name will not be published.

1

---
Exhibit 32(a)

ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP.

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO

The undersigned, John F. Young, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed this 17th day of February 2011.



/s/ JOHN F. YOUNGName:

John F. YoungTitle:

President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Energy Future Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Energy Future Holdings Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
GK INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, INC.
                             A Delaware corporation

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of GK Intelligent Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2000 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gary F. Kimmons, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: March 25, 2003                   /S/ Gary F. Kimmons
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        By: Gary F. Kimmons
                                        Its: President, Chief Executive Officer
                                             and Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

PAUL DAN SMITH, III,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv305-RH/GRJ

WALGREENS PHARMACY et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 9. No objections have been filed. The

recommendation is for dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim on

which relief can be granted.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff made successive purchases of

pseudoephedrine at a drug store, that store employees reported this to law

enforcement, and that as a result the plaintiff was arrested. The complaint names

as defendants only the owner and employees of the drug store.

Pseudoephedrine is used to treat the common cold but also is used in the
Page 2 of 3

manufacture of methamphetamine. Purchases of more than needed to treat a cold

reasonably arouses suspicion. The complaint does not indicate whether the arrest

was based solely on the purchase of pseudoephedrine or was based on additional

information as well.

The complaint fails to allege facts plausibly suggesting that any defendant

acted under color of law or acted in league with anyone who acted under color of

law. The complaint thus fails to state a claim arising under the Constitution. As

correctly set out in the report and recommendation, the plaintiff also has failed to

allege facts plausibly supporting a claim based on any alleged violation of statutes

or regulations governing the sale of pharmaceuticals. In short, the complaint fails

to state a claim arising under federal law.

A person may be held liable on a state common-law claim of malicious

prosecution if the person intentionally provides false information to a lawenforcement officer in order to bring about an arrest. Such a claim may be brought

in federal court if the parties are citizens of different states and the amount in

controversy exceeds $75,000. But the plaintiff has failed to state a maliciousprosecution claim on which relief can be granted because he has not alleged that

the defendants provided untrue information to a law-enforcement officer or

otherwise engaged in conduct constituting malicious prosecution. 

For these reasons and those set out in the report and recommendation, 

Case No: 5:10cv305-RH/GRJ
Page 3 of 3

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

further opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is

dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on February 2, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case No: 5:10cv305-RH/GRJ
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Voice Assist, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Metcalf, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/S/ Micahel MetcalfMichael MetcalfChief Executive Officer andPrincipal Executive OfficerNovember 22, 2010











In connection with the Quarterly Report of Voice Assist, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donna Moore, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





3.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





4.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/S/ Donna MooreDonna MooreChief Financial Officer andPrincipal Financial OfficerNovember 22, 2010
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RONALD DECHOW, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00105-MP-GRJ

GLEIM PUBLICATIONS INC, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on doc. 43, Notice of Resolution by Ronald

Dechow. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2(A), the plaintiff notifies the Court that this matter

has been amicably resolved by the parties. As such, the plaintiff requests dismissal of

his claims with prejudice, with the Court reserving jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the

Full And Final Settlement Agreement And General Release.

Unless a notice of dismissal is filed before the defendant serves an answer or

motion for summary judgment or a stipulation is signed by all parties who have

appeared, the action may be dismissed at the plaintiff’s request only by court order. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Further, the Court cannot enforce the terms of the final

settlement agreement unless the agreement is filed with the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

 1. This case is dismissed with prejudice at the plaintiff’s request pursuant to

Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Case 1:11-cv-00105-MP-GRJ Document 44 Filed 12/27/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 16.2(D) the Clerk is directed to close the file,

subject to the right of any party to move within 60 days of the date of entry

of this Order, to reopen the action, upon good cause shown, or to submit a

stipulated form of final order or judgment.

3. If the parties want the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of

the Full And Final Settlement Agreement And General Release the parties

must file the agreement with the Court. The agreement may be filed under

seal if the parties agree that the terms of the settlement must remain

confidential.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of December, 2011. 

áBZtÜç eA ]ÉÇxá 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:96-cr-00020-MP-AK-4

Case 1:11-cv-00105-MP-GRJ Document 44 Filed 12/27/11 Page 2 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 12652 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D. C. Docket No. 1:13

- cv - 00286

- KD

- B

ERIC MYREE PERKINS, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus KUSHLA WATER DISTRICT, WILLIAM SILVER, ROY KING, JAMES TODD, Defendants

- Appellees.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________ (April 13, 2015) Case: 14-12652 Date Filed: 04/13/2015 Page: 1 of 32 Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR , and EDMONDSON , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Eric Perkins, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment for Kushla Water District (“KWD”), William Silver, Roy King, and James Todd (“the defendants” ), on his claims that the defendants discriminated against him on the basis of his race (African

- American) , maintained a hostile work environment, retaliated against him for filing a discrimination charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, a nd constructively discharged him, in violation of Title VI, Title VII, § 1981, and § 1983.
Briefly stated, t he appeal presents two issues:

1. Whether Perkins’s causes of action are vested in his bankruptcy estate so that he lacks standing to bring this appeal ; and 2. Whether, in determining that Perkins failed to create a triable issue on his discrimination and retaliation claims, the district court erroneously viewed the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendants

.

First, because the insta nt causes of action arose after Perkins filed for bankruptcy, the action did not become part of his bankruptcy estate ; and his bankruptcy proceeding had no effect on his standing in the district court or on

Case: 14-12652 Date Filed: 04/13/2015 Page: 2 of 33 appeal. Second, contrary to Perkins’s contention s, the district court viewed the evidence in the light most favorable to him ; but that court nonetheless concluded
that he failed

-- as a matter of law

-- to establish a triable issue for his d iscrimination or retaliation claims. On appeal, Perkins has no t challenged t he di strict court’s legal standards , although he does quarrel about some immaterial
facts

. The district c ourt mainly concluded that the evidence failed to show sufficient adverse employment acts or to show white employees were treated differ ently and better. B ecause Perkins has failed to point to a reversible error on the part of the district court, we a ffirm the grant of summary judgment for the
defendants on all of his claims

. AFFIRMED. Case: 14-12652 Date Filed: 04/13/2015 Page: 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TERRY L. ROBINSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 5:11-cv-138-SPM-CJK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 4). Plaintiff has been mailed a copy and has been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report

and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 4) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The Motion to Vacate (doc. 1) is transferred to the United States

District Court for the Southern District of Georgia.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this fifteenth day of June, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-00138-SPM-CJK Document 5 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 1
##### 



LANCE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 EXHIBIT 32
 
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ David V. Singer
    
    /s/ Rick D. PuckettDavid V. Singer
    
    Rick D. PuckettPresident and Chief
    
    Executive Vice President,Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial Officer,April 27, 2007
    
    Treasurer and SecretaryApril 27, 2007
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-658]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Concession Contracts and Permits

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION:  Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the terms of existing concession contracts, public 
notice is hereby given that the National Park Service intends to 
request a continuation of visitor services for a period not-to-exceed 1 
year from the date of contract expiration.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The contracts listed below have been 
extended to maximum allowable under 36 CFR 51.23. Under the provisions 
of current concession contracts and pending the completion of the 
public solicitation of a prospectus for a new concession contract, the 
National Park Service authorizes continuation of visitor services for a 
period not-to-exceed 1 year under the terms and conditions of the 
current contract as amended. The continuation of operation does not 
affect any rights with respect to selection for award of a new 
concession contract.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Conc. ID No.                Concessioner name                 Park
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOMC001-96.......................  Evelyn Hill Corporation..  Fort McHenry National
                                                               Memorial and Shrine.
STLI002-88.......................  Evelyn Hill, Inc.........  Statue of Liberty
                                                               National Monument.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo A. Pendry, Concession Program 
Manager, National Park Service, Washington, DC 20240, Telephone 202/
513-7156.

    Dated: December 16, 2006.
John Wessels,
Acting Assistant Director, Business Services.
[FR Doc. 07-658 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-53-M
```