alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PAMELA WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv54/RV/EMT

RAY MABUS, 

Defendant.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) (Doc. 1). On February 3, 2011, this court

entered an order giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to pay the filing fee (Doc. 5). Plaintiff

failed to respond to the order; therefore, on March 15, 2011, the court issued an order requiring

Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty-one (21) days, why this action should not be dismissed for

failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc. 7). On March 29, 2011, the court issued an order

again giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma

pauperis (Doc. 8). The court advised Plaintiff that her failure to comply with the order would result

in a recommendation of dismissal of this action (id.). The time for compliance with the March 29

order has now elapsed, and Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in

forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

Case 3:11-cv-00054-RV-EMT Document 9 Filed 05/03/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

At Pensacola, Florida, this 3rd day of May 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:11cv54/RV/EMT

Case 3:11-cv-00054-RV-EMT Document 9 Filed 05/03/11 Page 2 of 2
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5394 

To amend the reporting requirements under the Iran Threat Reduction and 

Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2018 

Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the reporting requirements under the Iran Threat 

Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Iran Responsible Re5 porting Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) Iran’s Qods Force, a special unit of Iran’s 

9 Revolutionary Guard Corps, remains Iran’s primary 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5394 IH

1 vehicle to conduct terrorism and destabilize its 

2 neighbors. 

3 (2) Experts speculate that Iran’s Revolutionary 

4 Guard Corps controls between 20 and 40 percent of 

5 the Iranian economy. 

6 (3) The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action 

7 went into effect in January 2016, resulting in relief 

8 of sanctions for significant parts of the Iranian 

9 economy, with some direct benefit to Iran’s Revolu10 tionary Guard Corps-linked Iranian entities. 

11 (4) As Iranian money flows into the inter12 national financial system as a result of relief of 

13 sanctions under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of 

14 Action, it is in the critical interest of the United 

15 States to support the ongoing work of the Financial 

16 Action Task Force in comprehending and deterring 

17 Iranian corruption, particularly Iran’s Revolutionary 

18 Guard Corps ownership, from infecting global finan19 cial systems. 

20 SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO REPORTING REQUIREMENT 

21 UNDER THE IRAN THREAT REDUCTION AND 

22 SYRIA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT OF 2012. 

23 Section 102(b)(1) of the Iran Threat Reduction and 

24 Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8712(b)(1)) 

25 is amended by adding at the end before the semicolon the 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5394 IH

1 following: ‘‘, particularly the policy set forth in paragraph 

2 (1)(A)(i) and the policy set forth in paragraph 

3 (1)(A)(iii)’’. 

4 SEC. 4. SUMMIT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State, in coordi6 nation with the Secretary of the Treasury, is authorized 

7 to host a summit on an annual basis with major trading 

8 partners of Iran for the purpose of identifying and taking 

9 appropriate actions with respect to front companies and 

10 funding mechanisms of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps. 

11 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘major 

12 trading partners of Iran’’ means— 

13 (1) member countries of the European Union, 

14 the People’s Republic of China, and India; and 

15 (2) other countries that have a trade relation16 ship with Iran that exceeds $500,000,000 in the 

17 most recent calendar year for which data is avail18 able. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
#### WILLIAM D. KEYSER, Appellant, *v.*ELIZA TAYLOR *et al.,*Respondents.

No Appeal from Order Sustaining a Demurrer. An appeal does not lie from the action of a district court in simply sustaining a demurrer; there must be a final judgment in such case before an appeal can be taken.

Dismissal of Appeal. Where the record on appeal discloses simply the sustaining of a demurrer, without showing a judgment, the appeal will be dismissed.

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, Douglas County.

This was a suit, purporting to be in equity, to recover three hundred and forty-four dollars and fifty-three cents, alleged to have been loaned by plaintiff to Eliza Taylor before her marriage with her codefendant A. M. Taylor, and to have the judgment therefor declared a lien upon, and for the sale, for the payment of the same, of certain real estate in Douglas County, the separate property of Eliza Taylor, her title to which was alleged to have been perfected with the money loaned.

The defendants demurred on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against them, or either of them; and the demurrer was sustained.

*436The notice of appeal was “ from the ruling, order, and judgment,” etc., *“*sustaining the demurrer,” etc. The order and exceptions thereto were contained in the transcript, but no final judgment, or anything to show that one had ever been rendered. ■

*Doyle and*Tebbs, for Appellant.

*Robert M.*Clarke, for Respondents.

By the Court,

Lewis, C. J.

No judgment appears to have been rendered by the Court below in this action. The record shows that the demurrer to the complaint was sustained, but whether judgment was rendered against the plaintiff, or whether he was allowed to amend his pleading does not appear.

The statute does not authorize an appeal from the action of the Court simply sustaining a demurrer. There must in such case be a final judgment before an appeal can be taken. (Practice Act, Sec. 285. *Moulton*v. Ellmaker, 30 Cal. 527.)

Appeal dismissed.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FATAOULAYE DANDAKOYE,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00100-MP-WCS

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DAVID F HARVEY, ERIC H HOLDER, JR,

MARC MOORE, JANET NAPOLITANO,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 12, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the habeas petition be dismissed in this case because the

petitioner has been released from custody. The time for filing objections has passed, and none

have been filed. It is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as moot, and the Clerk is

directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of June, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00100-MP-WCS Document 13 Filed 06/09/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Dror Svorai, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of InfoSpi, Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InfoSpi, Inc. for quarter ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Amended Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of InfoSpi, Inc.








DATE: March 15, 2011
By:
/s/Dror SvoraiName: Dror SvoraiTitle: Chief Executive Officer





By:
/s/Dror SvoraiName: Dror SvoraiTitle: Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to InfoSpi, Inc. and will be retained by InfoSpi, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control 

 and Prevention (CDC) 

LETTER TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES

Subject: Certification Standards for Closed-Circuit Escape Respirators

Standards for the certification of closed-circuit escape respirators (CCERs) were updated in a 

2012 final rule establishing Subpart O in Title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 84 (42 CFR 

84). In the language of that final rule, manufacturers were allowed to continue to manufacture, 

label, and sell respirators certified to the prior Subpart H standards until April 9, 2015. 

In response to concerns from manufacturers and other stakeholders, in January 2015, NIOSH 

published an interim final rule to extend the April 9, 2015 deadline until 6 months after the date 

the first approval is granted to a product in each of these categories: Cap 1 mining, Cap 3 mining, 

and Cap 3 non-mining. The comment period for this interim final rule closed on March 30, 

2015, and NIOSH is currently considering the submissions we received to the docket. [To read 

the interim final rule or the public comments received, visit www.regulations.gov and search for 

CDC-2015-0004]. 

At this time:

 The interim final rule provides an extension permitting the continued manufacture, 

labeling, and sale of previously-approved Subpart H CCERs for a period of 6 months 

after the date that at least one Subpart O CCER is approved by NIOSH in the Cap 1 

mining, Cap 3 mining, and Cap 3 non-mining categories, respectively.

 Any small-capacity CCER (all CCERs with rated service times less than 20 minutes) 

manufactured and labeled as NIOSH-approved and sold for use in non-mining 

applications must comply with the requirements of Subpart O.

 Small-capacity, Subpart H CCERs intended for non-mining applications may no longer 

be sold by the manufacturer as NIOSH-approved.

All types of CCERs approved under Subpart H, including small-capacity CCERs, that were 

manufactured and labeled as NIOSH-approved, and sold by April 9, 2015, may continue to be used 

as NIOSH-approved respirators until the end of their service life.

Sincerely yours,

David Chirdon

Chief, Technology Evaluation Branch

National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory

National Institute for Occupational

 Safety and Health (NIOSH)

National Personal Protective 

 Technology Laboratory (NPPTL)

626 Cochrans Mill Road

Pittsburgh, PA 15236-0070

Phone: 412-386-4000

Fax: 412-386-4051

April 15, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5317 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 543
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5317

                          [Report No. 115-703]

     To repeal section 2141 of the Revised Statutes to remove the 
     prohibition on certain alcohol manufacturing on Indian lands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2018

Ms. Herrera Beutler (for herself, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. 
 Heck, and Mr. Cole) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

                              May 24, 2018

                    Additional sponsor: Ms. McCollum

                              May 24, 2018

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To repeal section 2141 of the Revised Statutes to remove the 
     prohibition on certain alcohol manufacturing on Indian lands.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN ALCOHOL MANUFACTURING ON 
              INDIAN LANDS.

    Section 2141 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 251) is repealed.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 543

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5317

                          [Report No. 115-703]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

     To repeal section 2141 of the Revised Statutes to remove the 
     prohibition on certain alcohol manufacturing on Indian lands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 24, 2018

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
Case 3:11-cr-00046-LC   Document 40   Filed 12/30/13   Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER







PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with this Quarterly Report of INDEPENDENT FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.  (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeff Ritchie, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated:  August 25, 2010 | /s/ Jeff Ritchie
Jeff Ritchie
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

OLOPADE OLA OYEYEMI,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv145-SPM/WCS

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., et al.,

Respondents.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated June 30, 2011. Doc. 27. Petitioner has been

furnished a copy and has filed objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). Doc. 9. Despite the objections, I have determined that

the report and recommendation is correct and should be adopted. Accordingly, it

is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 27) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) filed by Olopade Ola

Oyeyyemi pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is denied because the petition was filed

Case 4:11-cv-00145-SPM-WCS Document 29 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

prematurely and because Petitioner has acted to prevent his removal from the

United States.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of July, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:11cv145-SPM/WCS

Case 4:11-cv-00145-SPM-WCS Document 29 Filed 07/14/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2010248EN.01000101.xml

| 15.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5922 — Posco/Daewoo International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 248/01

On 3 September 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5922. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5922. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JANET MARCUSSE, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv301-MP-WCS

Warden W. T. TAYLOR, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated September 9, 2011. (Doc. 8). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc.1), challenging the judgment

imposed in the Western District of Michigan, is DISMISSED.

DONE and ORDERED this 21st day of November, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00301-MP-WCS Document 10 Filed 11/22/11 Page 1 of 1
# CA2009097EN.01S00501.xml

| 28.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 97/s5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 97/s5

---

NOTICE TO READERS

NOTICE TO READERS

BG: Настоящият брой на Официален вестник е публикуван единствено на английски, немски и френски език.

ES: El presente Diario Oficial se publica únicamente en las lenguas alemana, francesa e inglesa.

CS: Toto číslo Úředního věstníku vychází pouze v angličtině, francouzštině a němčině.

DA: Denne EU-Tidende offentliggøres udelukkende på engelsk, fransk og tysk.

DE: Dieses Amtsblatt wird nur in Deutsch, Englisch und Französisch veröffentlicht.

ET: Käesolev Euroopa Liidu Teataja number ilmub ainult inglise, prantsuse ja saksa keeles.

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

EL: Η παρούσα Επίσημη Εφημερίδα εκδίδεται μόνο στην αγγλική, τη γαλλική και τη γερμανική γλώσσα.

EN: This Official Journal is only published in English, French and German.

FR: Le présent Journal officiel est uniquement publié en langues allemande, anglaise et française.

GA: Tá an Iris Oifigiúl seo á foilsiú i mBéarla, i bhFraincis agus i nGearmáinis amháin.

IT: La presente Gazzetta ufficiale è pubblicata solo in lingua francese, inglese e tedesca.

LV: Šis Oficiālais Vēstnesis ir publicēts tikai angļu, franču um vācu valodā.

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

LT: Šis Oficialusis leidinys išleistas tik anglų, prancūzų ir vokiečių kalbomis.

HU: A Hivatalos Lapnak ez a száma kizáról agangol, francia és német nyelven jelenik meg.

MT: Dan il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali ser ikun ippubblikat biss bl-Ingliż, bil-Franċiż u bil-Ġermaniż.

NL: Dit Publicatieblad verschijnt uitsluitend in het Duits, het Engels en het Frans.

PL: Niniejszy Dziennik Urzędowy jest publikowany jedynie w językach niemieckim, angielskim i francuskim.

PT: O presente Jornal Oficial é apenas publicado nas línguas alemã, francesa e inglesa.

RO: Prezentul Jurnal Oficial este publicat numai în limbile engleză, franceză și germană.

SK: Tento úradný vestník vychádza iba v angličtine, francúzštine a nemčine.

SL: Ta Uradni list je objavljen samo v angleškem, francoskem in nemškem jeziku.

FI: Tämä virallisen lehden numero julkaistaan ainoastaan englannin, ranskan ja saksan kielellä.

SV: Detta nummer av Europeiska unionens officiella tidning utkommer endast på engelska, franska och tyska.

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:11-cr-21-SPM/WCS-2

DEMARIO ANTRON PARAMORE,

 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation (doc. 43) of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of

the Defendant, DEMARIO ANTRON PARAMORE, to Counts Two, Three, and Four of

the Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. The plea agreement is REJECTED as to Count

One. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this thirteenth day of May, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge