alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 67

- -

**OFFICE OF**  **THE AITORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

'8 Annotatab Clrll **Statuta8, a8** 

# I

_ Son. 6. X. Filler, pa60 2 ‘;. 

### 68

per nanth. Prorl484 that in oountlorh8ring 8

r pul8tlon of not lo** than thirty-fir8thouwind 35,000) ~4 not aOr8 

### tbA l i&htr thousand (60,000) an4 0ontaM.n~ a oity oi aor than **Want** -nine thouund (29,000)population,oa* jur8nl 8 olfloer i may b0 appoint06 **br** th* Commie8lonar8~ Court, rhea in thdr opinion tha 8~~;008 or ruoh orrioor 18 n*o484, who88 mmla~ shmU not oxowl Two Hundred DolL8r8 ($200) per month an4 ax nrer nottol

xo884 TWO Xuadr84 ad lfrtf Dollars ( 

### r 250)

### per year, Ur4
aa In ruoh oouatl~* thr Comdrdonora~ court uy 

### l ppolnt 

### an l

**l*tant to tha mid jur*nilrorrioor, whoa in thrlr opinion 8uoh 88818t8nt ir n808888rFJ Who80 aalarp l

h811 not l

roood Oao Hun4re4 8n4 tifty Dollar8 (31501 

### per month. Prort484 further that, in 

### oouutler

hsring 8 pa ulation OS not la** th8a **twenty thouran**  **(20,000** P **8n4** not iarm* thsn l lghty thou*snb (gO,OOO),

### as 8houn **by** the 1940 todora Canrur or any future Foboral Conrur an4 whloh ham an ar*rr*r& valuationof taubi* proprrtr of not 1808 than Yourtwm bAllion Five iiunilred Thourand Dollar8 (jU,,500 000) and not nor0 than Slxtarn mr,llllon

Dollar0 $16,OOO,OOO),on0 juvrr~llr ofrioer t 

### aey bo l ppolntod by the COmal8alaner8' COUrt, when in their judgcwnt l uah oifloer la n*odob,who *hall reoeivo a 8alary nd to *x0084 Two XunfArobDollar8 (b200) per month.

wS81ar18* 0r pia jursnllr orfioerr an4 thalr l88l*tant* *hall be rixe4 **by** the coaml88lonor** Court, not to *x0884 th8 8um8 horrln mentioned, ma any bill tor th0 l xpmir0a not l

xo00ding the 8u.w haroln prorid* ior, l hall,~bo

oortlfled **by** the oounty judga l* bolng neoerury in th* perforaanor or thr duties 0r a **5uronl18** orriarr. Tha cammiealoner** Court of the oounty 8hall prorid* tha neooraary fun48 for the pa$moLit OS ularlor an4 l ~p0n808

or the **5~~8n110** orrloorr pwt48a ror 

### ln thin Aot.+ * +"

### Hon. 9. Mb Plller, pa40 3

Th8 rboro guoto4 prrtr **0s** 8814 Artlol* prorl8lon8 

### 48sling with 

### ths qu88tlon8

wk84 opir~lon

Tsflor County la thonbr 

### ruthorirrd jurOnli8 orriorr not tol xoe04 **tru** sum **0s** on8 mmu-ou mm honty-fire DOU8rS 

### ($125) 

### pr math.

NO protl8lon

is ma48 than&a for t&o ppMt or .sR~@@@ **to** 

### or **rot** th8 **bsn8rit 0s**  **juruu8 0rri00r8**  **to** l wntios 8itorto4 88 Taylor count 18 th0nrore, Tlfkr Gout7 ournot py ta or for thr 

### b0mit 0s i t8 JUTS~~ 0mnr uiy 8u8 a8 l ~pn808~

Tours mrf tsar,
ATToluGcr 0mswI CR TNXM


## Br 0, 8 2z4FL-z fas,‘n. B00#8tt mrirtant .
# C_2009151EN.01002401.xml

| 3.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/24

---

Notification on the minimum height for the operation of mobile communication services on aircraft (MCA services) above parts of Austrian national territory, provided by Austria in accordance with Article 4 of Commission Decision 2008/294/EC

2009/C 151/07

For the parts of Austrian national territory situated respectively south or west of the line connecting the geographical coordinates 13° 00′ E/47° 55′ N — 16° 00′ E/47° 52′ N — 16° 02′ E/47° 31′ N — 15° 04′ E/46° 39′ N, the minimum flight altitude is 5 000 m above ground.

As an alternative, systems can be used which measure the minimum flight altitude of 3 000 m above ground from the highest point of a square having sides of 10 or more kilometres in length, or other systems which guarantee at least an equal standard of protection of terrestrial mobile systems. In this case, in accordance with the Decision 2008/294/EC the minimum altitude is 3 000 m above ground, including above the parts of Austrian national territory named above.

---
# CA2009177EN.01000401.xml

| 30.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 177/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 177/4

---

RESERVE LIST
   (1)

RESERVE LIST

1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/57/08

OPEN COMPETITION

Assistants (AST 1) in the field of internal security

(2009/C 177 A/03)

| BALTAIS | Janis |
| --- | --- |
| BARBARO | Enio Vincenzo Francesco |
| BARBE | Kurt |
| BARBIER | Jonathan |
| BOGNAR | Miklos |
| BONTEA | Aurel |
| BOTERBERG | Jan |
| BURGHIU | Mariana |
| DE KEMNITZ RAMALHO ORTIGAO NEVES | Filipe Miguel |
| DE RUYCK | Rik |
| D'HELFT | Jeroen |
| DOMINGOS TOMAS | Jose Joao |
| DRKOSCH | Katrin Beate Valerie |
| FERNANDEZ VILLALVILLA | Francisco Javier |
| GEREVA | Dessislava |
| GIUSTI | Lucia |
| GREBENC | Andrej |
| GUILLAMON | Yannick |
| HOURLAY | Didier |
| JANSSENS | Michiel |
| KALNINA | Dace |
| KUZMICZ (PIOTRKOWSKA) | Daria |
| LECLOUX | Thierry |
| MAQUEDA LAFUENTE | Ana |
| MARIN | Constantin |
| MORAGREGA ARROYO | Monica |
| NEUKERMANS | Willem |
| OTTENBURGS | Peter |
| PIETRANIK | Joanna |
| ROCHE | Jean-Baptiste |
| RYSAVKOVA | Jitka |
| SANZ CANIL | Sergio |
| SCHNEIDER | Frank |
| SOATTIN | Stefano |
| SOBANSKI | Piotr |
| SZENTES | Gyula |
| VAN STEERTHEM | Frederik |
| ZACCARI | Fabrizio |

BALTAIS

Janis

BARBARO

Enio Vincenzo Francesco

BARBE

Kurt

BARBIER

Jonathan

BOGNAR

Miklos

BONTEA

Aurel

BOTERBERG

Jan

BURGHIU

Mariana

DE KEMNITZ RAMALHO ORTIGAO NEVES

Filipe Miguel

DE RUYCK

Rik

D'HELFT

Jeroen

DOMINGOS TOMAS

Jose Joao

DRKOSCH

Katrin Beate Valerie

FERNANDEZ VILLALVILLA

Francisco Javier

GEREVA

Dessislava

GIUSTI

Lucia

GREBENC

Andrej

GUILLAMON

Yannick

HOURLAY

Didier

JANSSENS

Michiel

KALNINA

Dace

KUZMICZ (PIOTRKOWSKA)

Daria

LECLOUX

Thierry

MAQUEDA LAFUENTE

Ana

MARIN

Constantin

MORAGREGA ARROYO

Monica

NEUKERMANS

Willem

OTTENBURGS

Peter

PIETRANIK

Joanna

ROCHE

Jean-Baptiste

RYSAVKOVA

Jitka

SANZ CANIL

Sergio

SCHNEIDER

Frank

SOATTIN

Stefano

SOBANSKI

Piotr

SZENTES

Gyula

VAN STEERTHEM

Frederik

ZACCARI

Fabrizio

The reserve list will be valid until 31 December 2010 and may be extended.

31 December 2010

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
# C_2011074EN.01000601.xml

| 8.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 March 2011

2011/C 74/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4028 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4572 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86100 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8755 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2960 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,226 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,66 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7061 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9732 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2005 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2473 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3803 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3616 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9242 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8985 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7733 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 565,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6253 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1975 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4072 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 321,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2470 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,659 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,4734 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,673 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3211 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8308 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,2000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4028

JPY

Japanese yen

115,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4572

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86100

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8755

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2960

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,226

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,66

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7061

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9732

RON

Romanian leu

4,2005

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2473

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3803

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3616

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9242

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8985

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7733

KRW

South Korean won

1 565,87

ZAR

South African rand

9,6253

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1975

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4072

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 321,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2470

PHP

Philippine peso

60,659

RUB

Russian rouble

39,4734

THB

Thai baht

42,673

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3211

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8308

INR

Indian rupee

63,2000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eas tern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3834

___________ Christopher D. Laughlin, * * Appellant , * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Larry B. Norris, Director, Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas Department of Correction; Bil l * Terry, CO-3, Arkansas Department of * [UNPUBLISHED] Correction; A.J. Hall, CO-5, Arkansas * Department of Correction, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 25, 1999 Filed: May 17, 1999

___________ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Christopher D. Laughlin appeals from an order entered in the District Court 1 for the Eastern District of Arkansas. In his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, Laughlin claimed-2-

an Arkansas Department of Correction grooming policy violated his First Amendment free exercise rights and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb to 2000bb-4. He sought preliminary and permanent injunctive relief. The district court dismissed Laughlin’s RFRA claim and denied his request for a preliminary injunction.
On appeal, Laughlin argues the merits of his free exercise claim. Because the order from which Laughlin appeals did not dispose of that claim, it is not before us. See Thomas v. Basham , 931 F.2d 521, 523 (8th Cir. 1991) (order dismissing fewer than all claims in pending action is not final appealable order). However, we have jurisdiction
over the district court’s denial of preliminary injunctive relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We conclude the court did not abuse its discretion by denying Laughlin injunctive relief. See United Indus. Corp. v. Clorox Co. , 140 F.3d 1175, 1179 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review). Laughlin could not demonstrate a probability of succeeding on the merits. See Dataphase Sys., Inc. v. C.L. Sys., Inc. , 640 F.2d 109, 114 (8th Cir. 1981) (en banc) (probability of success on merits should be considered when movant requests preliminary injunction). We have consistently concluded that prison grooming policies similar to the present one are reasonably related to legitimate security concerns that outweigh inmates’ free exercise rights. See Hamilton v. Schriro , 74 F.3d 1545, 1550-51 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 519 U.S. 874 (1996); Iron Eyes v. Henry , 907 F.2d 810, 814-16 (8th Cir. 1990).
Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Laughlin’s request for preliminary injunctive relief.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2010349EN.01000301.xml

| 22.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 349/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 349/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 December 2010

2010/C 349/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3155 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,00 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4507 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85030 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9795 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2613 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8620 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,258 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9940 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2888 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0479 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3183 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3410 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2264 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7666 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7277 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 516,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,9584 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7598 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3864 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 894,14 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1173 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,342 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,4468 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,675 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2349 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3017 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,5000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3155

JPY

Japanese yen

110,00

DKK

Danish krone

7,4507

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85030

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9795

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2613

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8620

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,258

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9940

RON

Romanian leu

4,2888

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0479

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3183

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3410

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2264

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7666

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7277

KRW

South Korean won

1 516,74

ZAR

South African rand

8,9584

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7598

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3864

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 894,14

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1173

PHP

Philippine peso

58,342

RUB

Russian rouble

40,4468

THB

Thai baht

39,675

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2349

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3017

INR

Indian rupee

59,5000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILHEMINA BRYAN,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv496-RH/WCS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 9. No objections have been filed.

The petitioner was convicted and sentenced in the United States District

Court for the Middle District of Florida. She appealed. The Eleventh Circuit

affirmed the judgment. The petitioner filed a motion challenging the judgment

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Middle District denied the motion.

The petitioner now has filed in this court a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241

challenging the Middle District judgment. She asserts she was improperly

classified as a career offender under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. The

petitioner is correct that recent decisions have changed the law of the circuit on the

Case 4:10-cv-00496-RH-WCS Document 10 Filed 07/20/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

application of the career-offender guidelines. See, e.g., Begay v. United States, 553

U.S. 137 (2008); United States v. Archer, 531 F.3d 1347 (11th Cir. 2008). But the

petitioner has not alleged that any of the recent changes have anything to do with

her treatment as a career offender, which apparently was based on prior drug

convictions.

In any event, the report and recommendation correctly concludes that the

law of the circuit is now this: a defendant whose conviction has become final and

who has lost a § 2255 motion cannot challenge her career-offender treatment under

§ 2241. See Gilbert v. United States, 640 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2011) (en banc). 

The petition thus must be dismissed.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED. The clerk must enter

judgment stating, “The petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 is dismissed with

prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on July 18, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case No: 4:10cv496-RH/WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00496-RH-WCS Document 10 Filed 07/20/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011240EN.01000102.xml

| 18.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6278 — Takeda/Nycomed)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 240/02

On 29 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6278. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6278. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5475 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5475

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2018

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 108 North Macon Street in Bevier, Missouri, as the ``SO2 Navy SEAL 
                     Adam Olin Smith Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SO2 NAVY SEAL ADAM OLIN SMITH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 108 North Macon Street in Bevier, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``SO2 Navy SEAL Adam Olin Smith Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``SO2 Navy 
SEAL Adam Olin Smith Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 3:10cv332/MCR/CJK

CHARLES DENNIS ABBOTT, et al.,

 Defendants.

 /

CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS CHARLES DENNIS

ABBOTT AND JACKIE ABBOTT 

This cause is before the Court upon the parties’ Consent And Stipulation To

Judgment As To Defendants, entered into on April 6, 2011. (Doc. 14). Based on the

Consent and Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. That a recordable Consent Final Judgment be entered in favor of the United

States of America on the United States of America's claims in the above-captioned suit to

reduce tax liabilities to judgment in the amount of $269,813.46 as of March 31, 2011, for

joint and several income tax liabilities assessed against defendants Charles Dennis Abbott

and Jackie Abbott for taxable years 1997, 1998, 1999, 2002, 2003, 2006, 2007, and 2008,

plus statutory accruals and interest thereon as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and 26

U.S.C. §§ 6601,6621, and 6622.

2. That a recordable Consent Final Judgment be entered in favor of the United

States of America on the United States of America's claims in the above-captioned matter

in the amount of $12,684.95 as of March 31, 2011, for federal employment and

unemployment tax liabilities assessed against defendant Charles Dennis Abbott

individually for the taxable periods ending March 31,1999, June 30, 1999, and December
Page 2 of 2

31,1999, plus statutory accruals and interest thereon as provided by 28 U.S.C. §

1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. §§ 6601, 6621, and 6622.

3. That each party bear its own costs and attorney’s fees.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv332/MCR/CJK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

HANCOCK BANK, a Mississippi 

banking corporation, 

Plaintiff/ Counter-defendant,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-132/RS-EMT

JAMES A. BOYD, JR. et al., 

Defendants/ Counterclaimants. 

_________________________________________/

ORDER

A party may amend its counterclaim once as a matter of course within 21 days 

after service of a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). 

Here, Defendants Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaim (Doc. 29) 

was filed within the deadline imposed by Rule 15. Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss 

Counterclaim (Doc. 17) is therefore DENIED as moot. 

ORDERED on July 18, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00132-RS-EMT Document 30 Filed 07/18/11 Page 1 of 1