alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 2484]

#### In the Matter of the Application of JAMES DOLAN for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.

[193 Pac. 854]

1. Criminal Law — Justice op the Peace Without Jurisdiction . Over Violation op Prohibition Statutes.

A justice of the peace is without jurisdiction to try one accused of violating the prohibition statute and to impose a sentence of fine or imprisonment.

Original application by James Dolan for a writ of habeas corpus to secure his discharge from custody.

Petitioner discharged.

*Platt & Sanford,*for Petitioner.

*L. B. Fowler,*Attorney-General, for Respondent.

*Per Curiam:*

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus to procure the discharge of petitioner from the custody of the sheriff of Lyon County, Nevada.

The petitioner alleges that on the 21st day of September, 1920, a complaint was filed with the justice of the peace of Mason township, Lyon County, Nevada, charging that on said 21st day of September the petitioner, in said county, did keep, store, and manufacture for barter and sale intoxicating liquors; that a warrant was thereafter issued for the arrest of the petitioner; and that he was arrested and brought- into court and entered to said complaint a plea of guilty, upon which plea he was adj udged guilty and sentenced to pay a fine and to serve a sentence of six months in the county jail. Upon said sentence, petitioner was committed to the custody of the sheriff of said county, from which he seeks to be discharged, upon the ground that the said justice of the peace had no jurisdiction to enter a judgment in said matter.

To the petition the attorney-general has filed an answer, wherein it is admitted that the said' j ustice of *268the peace was without jurisdiction to enter a judgment in said criminal proceeding or to issue a commitment thereupon.

The justice of the peace was clearly without jurisdiction to enter any judgment whatever in said case, assessing a fine against petitioner or sentencing him to serve a term in the county j ail. Ex Parte Arascada, 44 Nev. 30; 189 Pac. 619; In Re Cecchettini, 44 Nev. 41, 189 Pac. 624.

It is ordered that the petitioner be discharged. .
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6724-6725]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-675]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Notice of Agency Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 10:30 a.m. on 
Thursday, February 15, 2007, the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in closed session, pursuant 
to section 552b (c)(2), (c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (9)(A)(ii), and (9)(B), 
Title 5, United States code, to consider matters relating to the 
corporation's surpervisory and corporate activities.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

[[Page 6725]]

    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-7122.

    Dated: February 8, 2007.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-675 Filed 2-9-07; 12:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
```
# CA2010062EN.01000101.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 62/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 62/1

---

Corrigendum to the vacancy notice for the Administrative Manager function (grade AD 14) of the Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications — BEREC Office

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 53 A of 3 March 2010
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 53 A of 3 March 2010

(2010/C 62 A/01)

On page 5, Section ‘Protection of personal data’, footnote 5:

for:

‘OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1.’,

read:

‘OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1 and specific privacy statement http://erg.eu.int/’.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CENTENNIAL BANK, successor 

in interest to COASTAL COMMUNITY

BANK,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-20/RS-MD

EDTC & B, LLC,

EDDIE RAY EANES, 

DAN GILL, 

TIM RAMSEY,

CHRIS MONTGOMERY, 

CHARLES BUTLER, 

DAVID F. PANETTI, 

STATE OF FLA., DEPT. of REVENUE,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

M AEORDER

Before me is the Motion for Order Directing Deposits of Rents and Memorandum 

of Law in Support (Doc. 37). The Defendants have not filed a response. Pursuant to 

FLA. STAT. § 697.07, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Motion (Doc. 37) is GRANTED. 

2. Defendant EDTC & B, LLC, its agents, representatives, members, and 

employees shall turn over rents on the mortgaged property to Plaintiff or its 

designee. 

3. Defendants shall provide to Plaintiff the following: (A) a list of all tenants

leasing the subject properties, including the address o f each tenant; (B) the 

Case 5:11-cv-00020-RH-CJK Document 38 Filed 06/13/11 Page 1 of 2
amount of any security deposit held by EDTC & B, LLC or any agent on its 

behalf and the type of deposit received.; (C) the amount of rent paid by each 

tenant; and (D) a copy of any written lease agreements. 

4. Plaintiff shall file a status report on the first business day of each month 

making account for the receipt and use of the collected rents. 

ORDERED on June 13, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00020-RH-CJK Document 38 Filed 06/13/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORP., 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-69/RS-EMT

ARTHUR ALLEN, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay (Doc. 49) is DENIED. 

ORDERED on July 8, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00069-RS-EMT Document 53 Filed 07/08/11 Page 1 of 1
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

NO. 2023 KW 0737

JAYVONTE PINES OCTOBER 23, 2023

In Re: Jayvonte Pines, applying for supervisory writs, 21st

Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 

700414. 

BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND WOLFE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Moneylogix
Group, Inc. for the Year Ending December 31, 2009, I, Gary Cilevitz, Chief
Executive Officer and President of Moneylogix Group, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:





1.
  Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
  The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Moneylogix Group,
Inc.





Dated:
April 15, 2010





MONEYLOGIX
      GROUP, INC.By:
                  /s/ Gary
      CilevitzGary
      CilevitzChief Executive
      Officer and
President
Instructions for Completing the Electronic Version of the Eleventh Circuit

Transcript Information Form

An electronic version of the Transcript Order Information Form is available on the Northern

District of Florida website.  The following instructions and guidance are provided:

1. Click on the link below to obtain the Transcript Order Information Form from the

Northern District of Florida website:

http://www.flnd.uscourts.gov/forms/Attorney/ECCA_transcript_form_fillable.pdf

2. Complete the form electronically using Adobe Acrobat or other PDF editor.  The form

should be signed using the s/ name convention for electronic signatures.

3. Save the completed form as a PDF document (using the full version of Adobe Acrobat,

PDF 995, etc.) or “print” the completed form to a PDF file (using programs which only

have PDF print capabilities).  The save option is preferred since it then allows the court

reporter to complete their portions electronically.

4. File the form electronically with the district court using the CM/ECF system.  From the

main CM/ECF menu select:

Civil or Criminal Events; Appeal Documents; Transcript Request Appeal Part I

5. After the transcript information form is e‐filed, use the notice of electronic filing to

access the PDF image of the form and print it for the following step.  This version of the

document contains the case number, filing date, and document number information in a

header along the top, if you have that feature enabled.

6. Mail the printed form to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals; 56 Forsyth Street NW,

Atlanta, GA 30303.

7. Your transcript information form will automatically be e‐mailed to the court reporter

when the form is e‐filed with the court.  Follow the prompts during the event. ***

Please note, if the court reporter is a contract reporter, a hard copy of the form will

need to be mailed to that particular reporter.

Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 216 Filed 08/16/12 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cr-23-RS-GRJ

FRANK EBEN GULLET, JR.,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 

520). No objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate (Doc. 496) is DENIED without 

prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the court.. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the civil case.

ORDERED on May 30, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cr-00023-MW-GRJ Document 529 Filed 05/30/12 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RAY CHRIS MOBLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:11cv268/LC/CJK

CAREEM HAMILTON,

Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

This civil rights case is before the Court upon referral from the Clerk. On

February 16, 2012, this Court entered an order requiring plaintiff, who was a prisoner

at the time he filed this civil rights action but who was since released, to update his

financial information by filing anAffidavit ofFinancial Status within thirty (30) days. 

(Doc. 11). Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the order would result in

a recommendation that this case be dismissed. To date, plaintiff has not submitted

the required financial affidavit, and has not responded to the Court’s April 4, 2012

order (doc. 12) requiring him to show cause, within fourteen days, why this case

should not be dismissed.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s

failure to comply with an order of the court.

Case 3:11-cv-00268-LC-CJK Document 13 Filed 04/25/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. That the Clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida this 25th day of April, 2012.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITEDSTATESMAGISTRATEJUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No: 3:11cv268/LC/CJK

Case 3:11-cv-00268-LC-CJK Document 13 Filed 04/25/12 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 226 (Monday, November 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 65984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5825]



[[Page 65984]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[(NM-920-1310-08); (NMNM 97871)]


Notice of Proposed Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease 
NMNM 97871

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Reinstatement of Terminated Oil and Gas Lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Class II provisions of Title IV, Public Law 97-451, 
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for 
reinstatement of oil and gas lease NMNM 97871 from the lessee, Energen 
Resources Corp, for lands in Eddy County, New Mexico. The petition was 
filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date 
the lease terminated under the law.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lourdes B. Ortiz, BLM, New Mexico 
State Office, at (505) 438-7586.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: No valid lease has been issued that affect 
the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and 
royalties of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year, and 16\2/3\ 
percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500.00 
administrative fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $166.00 cost 
for publishing this Notice in the Federal Register. The lessee met all 
the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 
31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We 
are proposing to reinstate lease NMNM 97871, effective the date of 
termination, December 1, 2006, under the original terms and conditions 
of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.
    Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Dated: November 19, 2007.
Lourdes B. Ortiz,
Land Law Examiner.
[FR Doc. 07-5825 Filed 11-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 of CFO Consultants, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Norm LeBeoufNorm LeBeoufChief Executive Officer/s/ Norm LeBeoufNorm LeBeoufChief Financial OfficerDated: Aug. 3, 2009   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CFO Consultants, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RONALD M. MAXEY,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-106-RS-GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPT.

OF CORRECTIONS,1

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The docket does not reflect that Petitioner has either

paid the $5.00 filing fee or filed a motion for leave to proceed as a pauper. Further

consideration of the petition will be deferred until the fee is paid or Petitioner is granted

leave to proceed as a pauper. 

Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

1 That the Clerk shall forward to Petitioner an application for leave to proceed

as a pauper;

2. That Petitioner shall have until June 15, 2011, to either file an application for

leave to proceed as a pauper or to pay the $5.00 filing fee;

3. That failure to comply with this order as instructed, or to show cause as

to why Petitioner is unable to comply, may result in the dismissal of this

case for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of this

Because Petitioner is an inmate in the custody of the Florida Department of Corrections (DOC),

1

the Secretary of the DOC is the state officer who has custody of Petitioner, and therefore is properly

named as the Respondent in this case. See Rule 2, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Petitions under

§ 2254. The Clerk is directed to correct the docket accordingly.

Case 5:11-cv-00106-RS-GRJ Document 3 Filed 05/16/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

court. 

2

DONE AND ORDERED this 16 day of May 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Petitioner should note that if he fails to respond to this Order and this case is dismissed, any

2

subsequently-filed habeas petition in this Court challenging the same conviction may be barred by the

one-year limitation period for filing a habeas petition in the federal courts. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).

Although the one-year period is tolled during the time in which a properly filed application for state postconviction relief is pending, see Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 8-9 (2000) (defining when an application is

"properly filed" under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2)), the time in which a federal habeas petition is pending does

not toll the one-year limitation period. See Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167 (2 001) (holding that an

application for federal habeas corpus review does not toll the one-year limitation period under §

2244(d)(2)).

Case No: 5:11-cv-106-RS-GRJ

Case 5:11-cv-00106-RS-GRJ Document 3 Filed 05/16/11 Page 2 of 2
# Assignment of Functions Regarding the Citizens Health Care Working Group

# Memorandum for the Secretary of Health and Human Services

By virtue of authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, the functions of the President under section 1014(o)(1) of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (Public Law 108-173) are assigned to the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

                        You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

[FR Doc. 07-67

Billing code 4110-60-M
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 31 (Thursday, February 15, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-736]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

Sunshine Federal Register Notice

Agency Holding the Meetings: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Date: Weeks of February 19, 26, 2007.

Place: Commissioners' Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
Maryland.

Status: Public and Closed.

Additional Matters To Be Considered: 

Week of February 19, 2007

Wednesday, February 21, 2007

9:30 a.m. Discussion of Security Issues (Closed-Ex. 1)

Week of February 26, 2007--Tentative

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

1:30 p.m. Discussion of Security Issues (Closed-Ex. 1) (Tentative)
* * * * *
    *The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short 
notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)--(301) 415-
1292. Contact person for more information: Michelle Schroll, (301) 415-
1662.
* * * * *
    The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet 
at: http://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/policy-making/schedule.html.
* * * * *
    The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation 
to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or 
the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another 
format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify the NRC's Disability 
Program Coordinator, Deborah Chan, at 301-415-7041, TDD: 301-415-2100, 
or by e-mail at [email protected]. Determinations on requests for reasonable 
accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis.
* * * * *
    This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; 
if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the 
distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, 
DC 20555 (301-415-1969). In addition, distribution of this meeting 
notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in 
receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send 
an electronic message to [email protected].

    Dated: February 12, 2007.
Michelle Schroll,
Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-736 Filed 2-13-07; 12:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

TAMEIKA OLIPHANT,

Petitioner

v.

MINHV V. THAI AND KHEIM L. THAI,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 386 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 21.1

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

(All Subsidiaries are Wholly Owned by the Registrant)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             Percentage Owned
Name                                    Jurisdiction of Organization           by Registrant
----                                    ----------------------------           -------------
<S>                                     <C>                                  <C>
Rogue Wave Software GmbH                         Germany                            100%
Inmark Development Corporation                   California                         100%
Rogue Wave Software UK LTD                       United Kingdom                     100%
HotData, Inc.                                    Delaware                          42.3%
Stingray Software, Inc.                          North Carolina                     100%
NobleNet, Inc.                                   Delaware                           100%
</TABLE>