alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 1 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 2 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 3 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 4 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 5 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 6 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 7 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 8 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 9 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 10 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 11 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 12 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 13 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 14 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 15 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 16 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 17 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 18 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 19 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 20 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 21 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 22 of 23
Case 4:11-cv-00116-RS-WCS Document 61 Filed 08/31/11 Page 23 of 23
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

GEORGE ANN THOMAS, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv72-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated April 2, 2012. (Doc. 18). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is affirmed.

DONE and ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00072-MP-GRJ Document 19 Filed 05/18/12 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Jacob Cohen, Appellant.

(Argued October 9, 1918;

decided October 29, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Kings County Court rendered March 18, 1918, upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of murder in the first degree.

*Frank X. McCaffry*for appellant.

*Harry E. Lewis, District Attorney {Harry G. Anderson*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
#### STATE v. LOCKLEAR

No. 95 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 292.

Application by defendant for further review denied 20 November 1979.
# C_2010214EN.01000101.xml

| 7.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5740 — Gazprom/A2A/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 214/01

On 16 June 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5740. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5740. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Amended Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-Q of Vycor Medical, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2010, I
                  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)
                           
                           
                           the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
                              31, 2010 of Vycor Medical, Inc. fully complies with the requirements
                              of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
                           
                           
                           the information contained in the Amended Quarterly Report on Form
                              10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, fairly presents in all
                              material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                              of Vycor Medical, Inc.   By:
                           
                           
                           /s/ Adrian LiddellName:
                           
                           
                           Adrian LiddellTitle:
                           
                           
                           Principal Accounting and Financial OfficerDate:
                           
                           
                           September 2, 2011
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 22

- 00014

- CV

___________________________

Original Procee ding

367th District Court of Denton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20

- 6892

- 431

Before Kerr, Birdwell, and Walker, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N RE 

### C.S. , Relator2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered : January 25, 2022
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6637
JAMES E. LANDRUM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus W. F. DALIUS, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-160-5-BO) Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 22, 2003 Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James E. Landrum, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James E. Landrum, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Landrum v. Dalius , No. CA-02-160-5-BO (E.D.N.C. filed Mar. 14, 2002; e ntered Mar. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

APOKUNIE OSCEOLA KWANZAA,

Petitioner,

v. 4:11cv221-WS

FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL, et al.,

Respondents.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 6)

docketed September 29, 2011. The magistrate judge recommends that the petitioner's

§ 2241petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DISMISSED

without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED without

prejudice."

Case 4:11-cv-00221-WS-WCS Document 7 Filed 10/26/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of October , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00221-WS-WCS Document 7 Filed 10/26/11 Page 2 of 2
<page>
	  				        EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Christian Angstadt, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan
Stanley Managed Futures LV, L.P.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

    b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant?s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant?s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant?s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant?s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant?s internal
control over financial reporting; and


<page>
5.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant?s auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant?s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant?s ability to record, process, summarize, and
report financial information; and

    b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant?s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  November 20, 2008   By: /s/Christian Angstadt
                                  Christian Angstadt
                                  Chief Financial Officer,
                                  Demeter Management Corporation,
                                  general partner of the registrant
# C_2011159EN.01001801.xml

| 28.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/18

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 May 2011

2011/C 159/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4265 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,70 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4562 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86685 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9108 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2221 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7690 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,585 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9780 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1320 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2895 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3346 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3925 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1002 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7479 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7632 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 543,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8805 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2621 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4375 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 224,56 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3280 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,770 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0420 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,323 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2981 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6077 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,4280 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4265

JPY

Japanese yen

115,70

DKK

Danish krone

7,4562

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86685

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9108

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2221

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7690

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,585

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9780

RON

Romanian leu

4,1320

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2895

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3346

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3925

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1002

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7479

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7632

KRW

South Korean won

1 543,57

ZAR

South African rand

9,8805

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2621

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4375

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 224,56

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3280

PHP

Philippine peso

61,770

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0420

THB

Thai baht

43,323

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2981

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6077

INR

Indian rupee

64,4280

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 546 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 546

 To amend section 412(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 
 require the Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement to obtain 
the approval of the Governor of a State before placing or resettling a 
            refugee with the State, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2017

Mr. Culberson (for himself, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Weber 
 of Texas, and Mr. Barletta) introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 412(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 
 require the Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement to obtain 
the approval of the Governor of a State before placing or resettling a 
            refugee with the State, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Resettlement Without Consent 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS ON DOMESTIC RESETTLEMENT OF REFUGEES.

    Section 412(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1522(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(E) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
                including the preceding provisions of this paragraph, 
                beginning on the date of the enactment of this 
                subparagraph, the following limitations on programs for 
                domestic resettlement of refugees under this chapter 
                shall apply:
                            ``(i) The Director shall not place or 
                        resettle a refugee within a State without the 
                        approval of the Governor of the State.
                            ``(ii) Notwithstanding any approval granted 
                        under clause (i), the Director shall not place 
                        or resettle a refugee in any locality within a 
                        State if the locality has in effect a law, or a 
                        policy with the effect of law, disapproving of 
                        refugee resettlement in that locality.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.10


 


Summary Translation of Distribution Agreement
with Lishui JiuAnJu Commercial Trade Co., LTD


 


Note: Zhejiang Tantech Bamboo Technology Co.,
Ltd contracts from time to time with Lishui JiuAnJu Commercial Trade Co., LTD. The summary below is from one of a series of agreements
that the companies use that constitute separate agreements, yet all such agreements are identical in all material respects.


 


Party A: Zhejiang Tantech Bamboo Technology
Co., Ltd


 


Party B: Lishui JiuAnJu Commercial Trade
Co., LTD


 


Contract Term: 2011-01-01 till 2011-12-31


 


Sales
scope: Zhejiang Tantech Bamboo Technology Co., Ltd (“Company”) authorizes Lishui JiuAnJu Commercial Trade Co.,
LTD (“Party B”) as sales agent of “Charcoal Doctor” products; the distribution channel is circulation;
Party B shall follow the pricing offered by the Company; products shall be shipped upon receipt of funds/cash; before the 8th
day of each month, the Company shall mail the accounts receivable statement for the previous month to Party B. Party B shall
confirm and stamp the statement within three days upon receipt and mail it back to the Company for filing; Party B promises its
sales price won’t be lower than its purchase price from the Company. If there are no business transactions after 15 days
of the effective date of the Agreement, the Agreement is terminated automatically.


 


30 days’ notice in written form is
required for terminating the contract.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding The Meeting:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission. 

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., Wednesday January 16, 2008. 

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. 

# Status:

Closed. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 Surveillance Matters. 

# Contact Person For More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084. 

David A. Stawick, 

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-6251 Filed 12-26-07; 11:15 am] 

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 229 (Thursday, November 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 67595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5875]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Vernal Ranger Districts Travel Management Plan, Ashley National 
Forest; Duchesne and Daggett Counties, UT; Correction

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice; correction

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Forest Service published a document the Federal Register 
of November 9, 2007, concerning request for comments on the proposed 
action for the Roosevelt/Duchesne and Flaming Gorge Ranger Districts 
Travel Management Plan. The document identified a 45-day comment period 
from the date of publication. The closing date corresponds with 
December 24, 2007. In order to avoid, the scoping comment period 
closing during the holidays, we are extending the comment period to 60 
days from the date of the original publication, which corresponds with 
January 8, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kris Rutledge, 435-781-5196.
    In the Federal Register of November 9, 2007, in FR Doc. 72-217, on 
page 63551, in the second column the DATES caption to read:

DATES: The comment period on the proposed action will extend 60 days 
from the date the Notice of Intent is published in the Federal 
Register. The draft environmental impact statement is expected July 
2009 and the final environmental impact statement is expected November 
2009.

    Dated: November 20, 2007.
Kevin B. Elliott,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-5875 Filed 11-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P