alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DOUGLAS HAROLD LOWERY, II,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv295/RV/CJK

WENDALL HALL, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated October 30, 2012. (Doc. 6). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, Un ited States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g) and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of November, 2012.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2011222EN.01000102.xml

| 28.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6269 — SNCF/HFPS/Wehinger GmbH/Rail Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 222/02

On 20 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6269. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6269. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

QUARMARDEN Q. BRAND,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv377/LAC/MD

OFFICER HAMILTON, et al.,

Defendants.

 

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated October 27, 2010. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections

have been filed.

Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 1 day of December, 2010. st

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

IVAN HARVEY, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv220-MP-GRJ

EDWIN G. BUSS, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated April 19, 2012. (Doc. 22). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and petitioner’s objections

thereto (doc. 25), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The motion to dismiss the petition as untimely (doc. 18) is GRANTED. This

case is dismissed with prejudice.

DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of August, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00220-MP-GRJ Document 26 Filed 08/07/12 Page 1 of 1
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129005 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129005 COA: 254907 Wayne CC: 03-012592-01 TERRANCE MARTEZ WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 14, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ROSEMARY CHAVEZ,

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:11cv90-SPM/GRJ

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON HUMAN

RELATION, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 4) which recommends that Plaintiffs’

Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 2) be denied and the case dismissed

for failing to state a claim for relief. Plaintiff has been afforded an opportunity to

file objections. No objections were filed. Upon consideration, I have determined

that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 4) is

adopted and incorporated by reference into this order;

2. Plaintiffs’ Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 2) is denied;

and

Case 1:11-cv-00090-SPM-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/13/11 Page 1 of 2
3. This case is dismissed for failing to state a claim for relief.

4. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2011.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

2

Case 1:11-cv-00090-SPM-GRJ Document 6 Filed 10/13/11 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5435 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5435

  To require Federal agencies to allocate grant funding to States and 
  localities based on the number of United States citizens and legal 
   residents as determined under the decennial census, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2018

  Mr. Messer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require Federal agencies to allocate grant funding to States and 
  localities based on the number of United States citizens and legal 
   residents as determined under the decennial census, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Funding Americans First Act''.

SEC. 2. ALLOCATION OF GRANT FUNDING.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall direct the head 
of each agency to use, as appropriate, the number of citizens and legal 
permanent residents residing in a State or political subdivision of a 
State, as determined under a decennial census of population under 
section 141 of title 13, United States Code, (beginning with the 2020 
decennial census) when determining funding for the following:
            (1) Block grants.
            (2) Categorical grants.
            (3) Any other funding measures determined by the Director 
        if the specific measure is calculated using the total 
        population of a State or political subdivision of a State.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Agency.--The term ``agency'' has the meaning given that 
        term in section 551 of title 5, United States Code.
            (2) State.--The term ``State'' means each of the several 
        States, the District of Columbia, each territory or possession 
        of the United States, and each federally recognized Indian 
        Tribe.
    (c) Effective Date.--This Act shall take effect on October 1, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GERVER FEDNER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00190-MP-WCS

ERIC H HOLDER, MARC J MOORE, JANET NAPOLITANO,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 7, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, recommending that this petition be dismissed as premature. The time for filing objections

has passed, and none have been filed, although petitioner has filed a motion for appointment of

counsel. Doc. 8. This motion was denied by the Magistrate Judge. After consideration, the

Court agrees with the Report and Recommendation that this petition was premature when filed

and must be dismissed without prejudice under Akinwale v. Ashcroft, 287 F.3d 1050, 1052 (11th

Cir. 2002). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and

incorporated herein. 

2. The petition is dismissed, and this case closed, but without prejudice to petitioner

bringing a proper petition now that the six-month period has passed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of August, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00190-MP-WCS Document 10 Filed 08/15/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DONNA L. ISLER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00178-MP -GRJ

BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 19, Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically

at 12/15/10 Hearing by Bankers Life and Casualty Company. Defendant has set out the

background for the request. Defendant recited also that Plaintiff was contacted and does not

object to the request. Upon consideration, Defendant’s request to appear telephonically at the

December 15, 2010 hearing, Doc. 19, is GRANTED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of December, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
---

Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Jag Sandhu, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Nava Resources, Inc. (the Company), and Johnny Astorino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 11, 2009



By:/s/ Jag Sandhu

Name: Jag Sandhu

Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



By: /s/ Johnny Astorino

Name: Johnny Astorino

Title: Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting

Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WELLS FARGO BANK NA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00127-MP-GRJ

BBMJ, LLC, KEITH BROOKING, WILLIAM BROOKS, DOUGLAS JOHNSON, JR.,

CHRISTOPHER G. MOHR,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on telephone status conference hearing. On October 21,

2011 the Court held a telephone status conference hearing to determine defendants’

representation by counsel. All parties participated in the hearing, at which Abraham C.

McKinnon stated that he represented Defendant Keith Brooking. Stan Cushman stated that he

represented all other defendants including the two that answered the complaint by letter. The

parties have agreed to early mediation as long as it does not cause undue delay. Accordingly, it

is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The parties are directed to mediate this matter at a time, place and before a

mediator of their choosing. Such mediation shall be scheduled so as to be

completed prior to November 11, 2011.

Case 1:11-cv-00127-GRJ Document 20 Filed 10/21/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. All pending motions are stayed pending the outcome of mediation.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:11-cv-00127-MP-GRJ

Case 1:11-cv-00127-GRJ Document 20 Filed 10/21/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 19

- 0587 Filed May 13, 2020

STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

MICHAEL PAUL KURNES , Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Appanoose County, Rose Anne

Mefford
, District Associate Judge.

Michael Kurnes appeals from his sentence after pleading guilty to operating
while intoxicated, third offense. AFFIRMED.

Steven E. Goodlow of Goodlow Law Firm
, Albia , for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Sharon K. Hall , Assistant Attor ney
General, for appellee.

Considered by Vaitheswaran, P.J. , and Doyle and May, JJ.2

MAY , Judge

. Michael Kurnes pled guilty 1 to operating while intoxicated, third offense, in
violation of Iowa Code section 321J.2 (2018). The district court sentenced Kurnes
to prison.
On appeal, Kurnes contends his trial counsel was ineffective. 2 To obtain
relief, Kurnes must prove “by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) counsel
failed to perform an essential duty, and (2) prejudice resulted.” State v. Cromer
, 765 N.W.2d 1, 7 (Iowa 2009). “Ordinarily, ineffective assistance of counsel claims
are best resolved by postconviction proceedings to enable a complete record to
be developed and afford trial counsel an opportunity to respond to the claim.” State

v. True sdell

, 679 N.W.2d 611, 616 (Iowa 2004).

Kurnes ’s brief suggests several ways in which he believes counsel was

ineffective

. But we do not find his claims are sufficiently developed for our review.

So we must preserve his claim s for a future postconvicti on
- relief p roceeding. See

State v. Harris , 919 N.W.2d 753, 754 (Iowa 2018) (“If the development of the

ineffective

- assistance claim in the appellate brief was insufficient to allow its

1 Iowa Code section 814.6 (2019 ) was recently amended to prohibit most appeals from guilty pleas. See 2019 Iowa Acts ch. 140 § 28. In State v. Macke , however, our supreme court held these amendments “apply only prospectively and do not apply to cases pending on July 1, 2019.” 933 N.W.2d 226, 228 (Iowa 2019). We are bound by our supreme court’s holding. We conclude, therefore, the amendments “do not apply” to this case, which was pending on July 1, 2019. See id. 2 We recognize Iowa Code section 814.7 (2019) was also recently amended to provide in pertinent part: “An ineffective assistance of counsel claim in a criminal case shall be determined by fi ling an application for postconviction relief” and “shall not be decided on direct appeal from the criminal proceedings.” See 2019 Iowa Acts ch. 140, § 31. But because this appeal was pending on July 1, 2019, the amendment “do[es] not apply” to this case

. See Macke
, 933 N.W.2d at 235.3

consideration, the court of appeals should not consider the claim, but it should not
outright reject it.”).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 35 (Thursday, February 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-824]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, March 30, 2007.

Place:  1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-824 Filed 2-20-07; 11:34 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Moody National REIT I, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Brett C. MoodyBrett C. MoodyChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.1






SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO






18 U.S.
C. SECTION 1350,






AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Gary F
Kimmons, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
eDoorways Corporation. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/S/ Gary
F Kimmons






-------------------------------






Gary F
Kimmons






Chief
Executive Officer






May 20,
2008






This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, or otherwise required, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                               35,860,000
<SECURITIES>                                                          9,855,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         4,678,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            307,000
<INVENTORY>                                                             846,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     51,965,000
<PP&E>                                                                8,872,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        1,508,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       65,028,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 5,261,000
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                             54,910,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                          (15,815,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         65,028,000
<SALES>                                                              18,966,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     18,966,000
<CGS>                                                                10,745,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        17,269,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        182,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      685,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (8,161,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (8,161,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                             (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             (1.08)



</TABLE>