alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010057EN.01000902.xml

| 9.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5549 — EDF/Segebel)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 57/05

On 12 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 3209M5549. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 3209M5549. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 551 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 551

   To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to permit 
insurers to offer catastrophic coverage plans to anyone, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2017

 Mr. Fortenberry introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to permit 
insurers to offer catastrophic coverage plans to anyone, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Care for All Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING INSURERS TO OFFER CATASTROPHIC COVERAGE PLANS TO 
              ANYONE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1302(e) of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18022(e)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(e) Catastrophic Plan.--A health plan not providing a bronze, 
silver, gold, or platinum level of coverage shall be treated as meeting 
the requirements of subsection (d) with respect to any plan year if the 
plan provides--
            ``(1) except as provided in paragraph (2), the essential 
        health benefits determined under subsection (b), except that 
        the plan provides no benefits for any plan year until the 
        individual has incurred cost-sharing expenses in an amount 
        equal to the annual limitation in effect under subsection 
        (c)(1) for the plan year (except as provided for in section 
        2713); and
            ``(2) coverage for at least three primary care visits.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1312(d)(3)(C) of the Patient 
Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 18032(d)(3)(C)) is 
amended by striking ``, except that'' and all that follows through 
``section 1302(e)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to coverage issued on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011191EN.01000701.xml

| 1.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6241 — CIE Management II/Gruppo Coin)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 191/02

On 21 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6241. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6241. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2010047EN.01002002.xml

| 25.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/20

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5771 — CSN/CIMPOR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 47/05

On 15 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5771. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5771. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5265 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5265

To amend the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 to eliminate the 
         applicability of such Act to the District of Columbia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2018

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 to eliminate the 
         applicability of such Act to the District of Columbia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``District of Columbia Home Rule Non-
Discrimination Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF APPLICABILITY OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION 
              ACT TO THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.

    Paragraph (2) of section 5 of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act 
of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb-2(2)) is amended by striking ``the District 
of Columbia,'' and the comma after ``Puerto Rico''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WELLS FARGO BANK NA, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00127-MP-GRJ

BBMJ, LLC, KEITH BROOKING, 

WILLIAM BROOKS, DOUGLAS 

JOHNSON, JR., CHRISTOPHER G.

MOHR and DOUGLAS JOHNSON, JR.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 21, Joint Motion for Enlargement of Time

to Attend Mediation. Due to scheduling conflicts, the parties have been unable to

coordinate a mediation date prior to November 11, 2011, as required by the Court’s

Order. The parties have agreed to mediation on November 29, 2011 in Atlanta, Georgia

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The parties’ joint motion for enlargement of time to attend mediation, Doc.

21, is GRANTED.

2. The parties shall complete mediation on or before December 7, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2011. 

áBZtÜç eA ]ÉÇxá 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00127-GRJ Document 22 Filed 11/14/11 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-1814

CALVIN LEE SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GILBERT F. JACKSON; OFFICER JASPER N. WHITEHEAD; OFFICER W. J. SANKER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-00-124-2)

Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich,

PENDER & COWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Calvin Lee Smith appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Smith v. Jackson, No. CA-00-124-2 (E.D. Va.

June 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Navidec, Inc. (the "Corporation") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I Ralph Armijo Chief
Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Corporation.


Navidec, Inc.



/s/Ralph Armijo
Chief Executive Officer
March 26, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

PETE MCNEIL,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:11cv206/RS-WCS

CHARLES DUNHAM and JORDAN

CARRIERS, INC.,

Defendant.

__________________________________

ORDER

Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 3.1(A), the trial scheduled for November 14, 2011,

will be conducted in the Panama City Division to preserve judicial resources. The 

Pretrial Order (Doc. 16) is amended to that extent. 

ORDERED on September 12, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00206-RS-WCS Document 19 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011039EN.01000801.xml

| 8.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6077 — TPG/Ashland Distribution)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 39/07

On 1 February 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6077. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6077. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 11



Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund,
LLC

Schedule of Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share/Unit

For the Periods



|                                                           |  | January 1, 2002 Through December 31, 2002 |           |   | January 1, 2001 Through December 31, 2001 |   |            | January 1, 2000 Through December 31, 2000
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------- | --------- | - | ----------------------------------------- | - | ---------- | -----------------------------------------
|Net Income (Loss)                                          |  | $                                         | (630,083  | ) |                                           | $ | (1,544,681 | )                                        
|                                                           |  |                                           |           |   |                                           |   |            |                                          
|Weighted Average Number of Common Shares/Units Outstanding |  |                                           | 4,223,445 |   |                                           |   | 4,219,549  |                                          
|                                                           |  |                                           |           |   |                                           |   |            |                                          
|Earnings (Loss) per Common Share/Unit                      |  | $                                         | (0.15     | ) |                                           | $ | (0.37      | )                                        
|                                                           |  |                                           |           |   |                                           |   |            |
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 

### 133427 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### MICHAEL ROBERT SCHILS, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133427 COA: 274231 Washtenaw CC: 05-000966-CZ WASHTENAW COUNTY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

d0917 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 24, 2007

Clerk
#### STATE v. SMITH

No. 352P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 372.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 July 1982.
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer   I, Richard Laufer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: February 13, 2009  /s/ Richard Laufer Richard Laufer Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 4.11.1



SUPPLEMENT



to the Annex to State license MTK No. DS 0000317 issued to Limited Liability

Partnership KaR-Tel for Entrepreneurship Activities Involving Provision of GSM

Cellular Communications Services



Add the following clauses to
Chapter 2:



2.10 The Licensee shall maintain electronic records on the
companys subscribers, including pre-paid packages, as well as the records of all outgoing and incoming subscriber calls (date, time, duration of calls).



When selling subscriber numbers and pre-paid packages the Licensee shall conclude contracts for the provision of communication services, such contract to contain the
following mandatory items:



| |  |  | subscribers personal details (name, subscriber number, passport data or details of a legal entity, address, TRN);
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | obligatory re-registration of subscriber numbers to a new owner when the number is sold;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | warning on blocking of the subscriber number in case of avoidance of the number registration to a new owner.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2.11 The Licensee pursuant to the applicable legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, upon
demand of competent bodies engaging in search and detection activities shall provide information on the companys subscribers (name, subscriber number, passport data or details of a legal entity, address, TRN) and information on outgoing and
incoming subscriber calls (date, time, duration of calls), and if necessary, provide a remote access to the electronic database of the companys subscribers.



Acting Chairman of the Agency

for Information
Technologies and Communications

|                                                                                                       |  |               
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------
|of the Republic of
Kazakhstan                                       
                      [signature] |  | A. Zhumagaliev
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Matter of the Marriage of Allan Ray Comstock and Mindy Lee Comstock

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 00 722

- CV

Trial court case number: 15

- FD

- 3019

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 1 of Galveston County

Appellant, Mindy Lee Comstock, has filed an unopposed motion for leave to file a supplement to her appellant’s brief. Appellant timely filed her brief on April 1, 2020. On July 2, 2020, a supplemental reporter’s record was filed. According to appellant’s motion, there are two trial court hearing transcripts which were not included in the originally filed reporter’s record, available at the time appellant submitted her brief. Appel lant has requested that this Court allow her to file a supplement to her appellant’s brief to make certain clarifications to factual assertions included in her appellant’s brief.

Appellant’s unopposed motion to file a supplement to her appellant’s brief is granted , and the “Supplement to Appellant’s Brief” filed by appellant on July 29, 2020 shall be considered accepted and filed as of that date

.
Appellee’s deadline to file his appellee’s brief is August 3, 2020. Because we grant appellant’s motion to file a supplement to her appellant’s brief, we also extend appellee’s deadline to file his appellee’s brief for a period of 14 days. Accordingly, appellee’s brief

is due to be filed on or before August 17, 2020

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____

/s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

____________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ August 4, 2020

____