alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 11



Western Pennsylvania Adventure Capital Fund, LLC

Schedule of Computation of Earnings (Loss) Per Common Unit

For the Periods



|                                             |  |                                           |           |   |                                           |   |                                           |  |   |           |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------- | --------- | - | ----------------------------------------- | - | ----------------------------------------- |  | - | --------- | -
|                                             |  | January 1, 2005 Through December 31, 2005 |           |   | January 1, 2004 Through December 31, 2004 |   | January 1, 2003 Through December 31, 2003 | 
|Net Income (Loss)                            |  | $                                         | (743,000  | ) |                                           | $ | 464,546                                   |  | $ | (376,755  | )
|                                             |  |                                           |           |   |                                           |   |                                           |  |   |           |  
|Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding |  |                                           | 4,222,870 |   |                                           |   | 4,222,870                                 |  |   | 4,222,870 |  
|                                             |  |                                           |           |   |                                           |   |                                           |  |   |           |  
|Earnings (Loss) per Unit                     |  | $                                         | (0.18     | ) |                                           | $ | 0.11                                      |  | $ | (0.09     | )
|                                             |  |                                           |           |   |                                           |   |                                           |  |   |           |
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Kysor Industrial Corporation



Re:    Kysor Industrial Corporation Registration Statement Nos.
2-67607, 2-86346, 2-99855, 33-18438, 33-30463,
33-27360, 33-59412 and 33-71758 on Form S-8



We are aware that our report dated October 16, 1996 on our review
of interim financial information of Kysor Industrial Corporation
and Subsidiaries for the periods ended September 30, 1996 and 1995
and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarters then ended are incorporated by reference in these
registration statements.  Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a
part of the registration statements prepared or certified by us
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


By	s/COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
        Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.




October 16, 1996
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

MARK F. SPANGLER,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 14-36023

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-00856-RSM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016**

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges. 

Mark F. Spangler appeals pro se from the district court’s default judgment in 

the government’s civil enforcement action alleging violations of the Investment 

Advisors Act of 1940 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. We have 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 14-36023 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, NewGen, 

LLC v. Safe Cig, LLC, 840 F.3d 606, 616 (9th Cir. 2016), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the government’s 

motion for default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). See 

Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986) (setting forth factors for 

determining whether to enter default judgment). The district court did not err in 

considering the impact of Spangler’s criminal conviction on its evaluation of the 

default judgment factors. See Collins v. D.R. Horton, Inc., 505 F.3d 874, 882 (9th 

Cir. 2007) (“[A] final judgment retains its collateral estoppel effect, if any, while 

pending appeal.”).

We do not consider arguments that were not presented to the district court. 

See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999). 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.12

 

ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT

 

This Assignment, made and entered into on this 30th day of December, 2002 by and between F. Nicholas Franano, an individual residing in Kansas City, Missouri (“Assignor”), and Proteon Therapeutics, L.L.C., a Missouri Limited Liability Company (“Assignee”).

 

WITNESSETH THAT:

 

WHEREAS, Assignor is the owner of a certain valuable invention entitled “Local, Transcatheter Delivery of Pretenses to Reopen Obstructed Biological Conduits” (hereinafter referred to as “Invention”), said Invention disclosed and/or claimed in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60,155,938 filed on September 24, 1999, U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 09,669,051 filed on September 24, 2000 and International PCT Application Serial No. PCT;US00/26237 filed on September 24, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as “Patent Rights”); and

 

WHEREAS, Assignor wishes to transfer ownership in said Invention and Patent Rights to Assignee to facilitate the further development and marketing of said Invention.

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Assignor does hereby assign all of Assignor’s right, title, and interest as Inventor in and to the Invention and in and to the Patent Rights, including, but not limited to all patent amendments and/or changes made to finally obtain a Patent and by its signature hereon, Assignee from this date forward agrees to bear all additional charges and costs, if any, associated with the processing of the Patent Application and agrees to save Assignor harmless from any such costs and / or expenses.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Assignment on the day and year first above mentioned.

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/ F. Nicholas   Franano
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
F. Nicholas   Franano, Assignor
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Proteon   Therapeutics, L.L.C.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   F. Nicholas   Franano
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
F. Nicholas   Franano, Managing Member
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-924]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel, Blueprint K18--
Neurodegeneration.
    Date: March 16, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Christine A. Livingston, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Extramural Activities, National 
Institutes of Health/NIDCD, 6120 Executive Blvd.--MSC 7180, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-8683, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: February 21, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-924 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5483 

AN ACT 

To impose a deadline for the promulgation of interim final 

regulations in accordance with section 311(h) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 831(h)) specifying the 

circumstances in which a special registration may be 

issued to a practitioner to engage in the practice of 

telemedicine, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5483 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Special Registration 

3 for Telemedicine Clarification Act of 2018’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR INTERIM FINAL REGULATIONS FOR 

5 A SPECIAL REGISTRATION TO ENGAGE IN 

6 THE PRACTICE OF TELEMEDICINE. 

7 Section 311(h)(2) of the Controlled Substances Act 

8 (21 U.S.C. 831(h)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘The Attor9 ney General shall, with the concurrence of the Secretary, 

10 promulgate regulations’’ and inserting ‘‘Not later than 1 

11 year after the date of enactment of the Special Registra12 tion for Telemedicine Clarification Act of 2018, the Attor13 ney General shall, with the concurrence of the Secretary, 

14 promulgate interim final regulations’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5483 

AN ACT 

To impose a deadline for the promulgation of incine, and for other purposes. practitioner to engage in the practice of telemedi- which a special registration may be issued to a U.S.C. 831(h)) specifying the circumstances in 311(h) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 terim final regulations in accordance with section
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JUSTIN WILLIS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv426/RV/EMT

DAVID MORGAN, SHERIFF, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated January 3, 2011 (Doc. 8). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed

objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of February, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 249 (Monday, December 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 74331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6227]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Open DeviceNet Vendor Association, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 14, 2007, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Open DeviceNet Vendor 
Association, Inc. (``ODVA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Camozzi SPA, Brescia, ITALY; and Trinite 
Automatisering B.V., Mydrecht, THE NETHERLANDS have been added as 
paries to this venture. Also, Advance Electric Company, Inc., Aichi, 
JAPAN; AMC Technologies, Edmonton, Alberta, CANADA; AVG Automation 
(Uticor), Bettendorf, IA; Cooper Power Tools, Lexington, SC; Daniel 
Woodhead Co. (Woodhead Connectivity), Northbrook, IL; Eilersen Electric 
A/S, Koddedal, DENMARK; Helix Technology Corporation (Granville-
Phillips), Clemsford, MA; MAC Valves, Inc., Wixom, MI; Microwave Data 
Systems, Rochester, NY; Wizardry Inc., Gardnerville, NV; Woodhead 
Software & Electronics (SST), Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA; and Woodhead 
Software & Electronics France, Caudebec Les Elbeuf, FRANCE have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and ODVA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 21, 1995, ODVA filed its original notification pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on February 
15, 1996 (61 FR 6039).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 30, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on November 7, 2007 (72 FR 62866).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-6227 Filed 12-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JAMES H. LEWIS, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00069-MP-CAS

SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPT.

OF CORRECTIONS, 

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated November 25, 2013. (Doc. 31). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2254, (doc. 5) is DENIED.
Page 2 of 2

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules

Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of December, 2013

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 4:11-cv-00069-MP-CAS
[Cite as State v. Freeman, 124 Ohio St.3d 121, 2009-Ohio-6538.]

T HE S TATE OF O HIO , A PPELLANT , v . F REEMAN , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State v. Freeman, 124 Ohio St.3d 121, 2009-Ohio-6538.] Certified question answered, and court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of State v. Lester. (No. 2009-1235

— Submitted September 1, 2009

— Decided December 17, 2009.)
C ERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Mahoning County, No. 08 MA 81, 2009-Ohio-3052.

__________________ {¶ 1} This matter is before the court upon the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Ap pellate District. The court determines that a conflict exists. {¶ 2} The certified question is answered by the court’s opinion in State v.
Lester , 123 Ohio St.3d 396, 2009-Ohio-4225, 916 N.E.2d 1038. The judgment of the court of appeals as to appellee’s (appellant below) first assignment of error is reversed on the authority of State v. Lester

. M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , and C UPP , JJ., concur.
L ANZINGER , J., dissents.

__________________ Paul J. Gains, Mahoning County Pr osecuting Attorney, and Ralph M. Rivera, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. William A. Freeman, pro se.

______________________
|               | •                                |   | the quarterly report for the quarter ended July 31, 2009 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |                                   |
|               | •                                |   | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                               |
|               |                                   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |   |
|               |                                   |   |
| September 21, 2009 | By: /s/ Stephen Browand                |   |
|               | Stephen BrowandChief Executive Officer |   |
|               |
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-18251, File No. 333-64383 and File No. 333-101781) of our report dated February 11, 2002 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of
Larscom Incorporated, which appears in Larscom Incorporateds Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2002.



|                                 
|---------------------------------
|/s/    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP       





San Jose, California

February 11, 2002
----

----

|  | (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: February 26, 2018 | By:    | /s/ David Gasparine                |   |
|-------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Name: David Gasparine              |   |
|                    |   | Title: Principal Financial Officer |   |
|                    |   |                               |   |
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PROPHET PAULCIN,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv267/RV/EMT

WALTER A. McNEIL, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal of the instant civil

rights case, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, without prejudice (doc. 10).

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that an action may be dismissed without an order of the court

by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before the adverse party serves an answer or files a motion

for summary judgment. Because Defendants have not yet been served in the instant case, it is clear

that Plaintiff is automatically entitled to a voluntary dismissal at this time.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal (doc. 10) be GRANTED and this case be

DISMISSED without prejudice.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 28th day of October 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case 3:11-cv-00267-RV-EMT Document 11 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 1