alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

NANCY CUSSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:11cv84-SPM/GRJ

OAKS MALL, LLC, a Delaware

Limited Liability Company,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

This cause is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Stipulation of

Dismissal With Prejudice requesting a dismissal of this action, with prejudice,

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with the Court

reserving jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement Agreement. After consideration

and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby:

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

2. All pending motions are denied as moot. 

3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the Settlement

Agreement and to award attorney fees and costs incurred to

enforce the terms thereof.

Case 1:11-cv-00084-SPM-GRJ Document 49 Filed 06/26/12 Page 1 of 2
4. The Clerk is directed to close this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of June, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

-2-

Case 1:11-cv-00084-SPM-GRJ Document 49 Filed 06/26/12 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cr48-SPM

JOSHUA ROBERT CARR,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY PLEA

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to

the Court’s consideration of any Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

11(e)(2), the plea of guilty of the defendant, JOSHUA ROBERT CARR, to Count

One of the indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this

Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of November, 2010. 

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
NIOSH Respiratory Protective Device Information

 NIOSH CA 2023-1057 

 April 2023 

Effective Immediately: Voluntary Rescission of 24 E.D. Bullard Company

Respirator Approvals 
Document Number

NIOSH CA 2023 - 1057

Page 2 of 3

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has honored a request by E.D. 

Bullard Company to voluntarily rescind 24 NIOSH respirator approvals issued to E.D. Bullard 

Company. 

As of April 21, 2023, any respirator marked with a NIOSH approval label with the below approval 

numbers are no longer NIOSH approved. The NIOSH Certified Equipment List no longer includes 

these approval numbers:

19C-0540 19C-0549 19C-0559 19C-0567

19C-0541 19C-0550 19C-0560 19C-0568

19C-0542 19C-0553 19C-0561 19C-0571

19C-0543 19C-0554 19C-0562 19C-0572

19C-0547 19C-0555 19C-0565 19C-0573

19C-0548 19C-0556 19C-0566 19C-0574

Due to the voluntary rescission of this NIOSH approval, respirators bearing these NIOSH approval 

numbers may no longer be used, manufactured, assembled, sold, or distributed.

Please reach out to E.D. Bullard Company. for additional details related to their decision to voluntarily 

rescind the approvals issued to E.D. Bullard Company identified in this notice. The Certified Equipment 

List can be used to locate other NIOSH Approved® respirators.

Effective Immediately: Voluntary Rescission of 24 E.D. Bullard Company Respirator 

Approvals 
Document Number

NIOSH CA 2023 - 1057

Page 3 of 3

NIOSH Approved® is a certification mark of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) registered in the 

United States and several international jurisdictions
# CA2009059EN.01000201.xml

| 13.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 59/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 59/2

---

Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions to constitute a reserve pool of Administrators (AD 5) of Bulgarian and Romanian citizenship:

EPSO/AD/147/09 — European public administration

EPSO/AD/148/09 — Law

EPSO/AD/149/09 — Economics

EPSO/AD/150/09 — Microeconomics/Business administration

EPSO/AD/151/09 — Audit

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 14 A of 21 January 2009
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 14 A of 21 January 2009

(2009/C 59 A/02)

On page 13, Title V(4):

for:

for:

‘Requests from candidates for access to information concerning them

Candidates involved in selection procedures have the specific right of access to certain information concerning them directly and individually, as described below. EPSO may accordingly provide candidates who so request with supplementary information relating to their participation in the competition. Candidates must send such requests in writing to EPSO within a month of being notified of their results in the competition. EPSO will reply within a month of receiving the request. Requests will be dealt with taking account of the confidential nature of selection board proceedings under the Staff Regulations (Annex III, Article 6) and in compliance with the rules on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data. Examples of the type of information which may be supplied are given in the guide for applicants, section III.3.’,

read:

read:

‘Requests from candidates for access to information concerning them

Candidates involved in selection procedures have the specific right of access to certain information concerning them directly and individually, as described below. EPSO may therefore supply supplementary information on candidates’ participation in the competition at their request. Candidates must send such requests by e-mail to EPSO within 10 days of being notified of their results in the competition. Requests will be dealt with taking account of the confidential nature of selection board proceedings under the Staff Regulations (Annex III, Article 6) and in compliance with the rules on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data. Examples of the type of information which may be supplied are given in the Guide for Applicants, Section III.3 (however, only the deadline specified in this corrigendum is authentic).’;

on page 15, in the Annex:

for:

for:

‘Requests for review

Within 20 days of the letter informing you of the decision being sent to you online, send a letter stating your case to:’,

read:

read:

‘Requests for review

Within 10 days of the letter informing you of the decision being sent to you online, send a letter stating your case to:’.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CATHY A. MOONEY,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:11cv211/RV/CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

__________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated February 13, 2012. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:11-cv-00211-RV-CJK Document 10 Filed 03/16/12 Page 1 of 2
2. The Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and the matter is

REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation.

3. The court reserves jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees pursuant to the

Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of March, 2012. 

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 3:11-cv-00211-RV-CJK Document 10 Filed 03/16/12 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41323

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARTIN LORENZO ARGETA-JIRON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-538-1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Martin Lorenzo 

Argeta-Jiron has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Argeta-Jiron has filed a response. The 

record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of 

Argeta-Jiron’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41323 Document: 00513557266 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
No. 15-41323

2

to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States

v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Argeta-Jiron’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-41323 Document: 00513557266 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 44 Filed 12/16/10 Page 1 of 9
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 44 Filed 12/16/10 Page 2 of 9
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 44 Filed 12/16/10 Page 3 of 9
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 44 Filed 12/16/10 Page 4 of 9
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 44 Filed 12/16/10 Page 5 of 9
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 44 Filed 12/16/10 Page 6 of 9
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 44 Filed 12/16/10 Page 7 of 9
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 44 Filed 12/16/10 Page 8 of 9
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 44 Filed 12/16/10 Page 9 of 9
# C_2011234EN.01000301.xml

| 10.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 August 2011

2011/C 234/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4267 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4497 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87310 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2127 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0594 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8295 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,220 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0956 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2625 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5164 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3990 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4143 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1401 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7329 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7329 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 555,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,3710 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1745 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4550 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 251,94 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3193 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,611 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,3780 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,725 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3138 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7385 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,5010 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4267

JPY

Japanese yen

110,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4497

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87310

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2127

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0594

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8295

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,220

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0956

RON

Romanian leu

4,2625

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5164

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3990

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4143

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1401

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7329

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7329

KRW

South Korean won

1 555,96

ZAR

South African rand

10,3710

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1745

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4550

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 251,94

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3193

PHP

Philippine peso

60,611

RUB

Russian rouble

42,3780

THB

Thai baht

42,725

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3138

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7385

INR

Indian rupee

64,5010

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5205 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5205

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, as the ``Sergeant Kenneth Eric 
                         Bostic Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT KENNETH ERIC BOSTIC POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5205

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, as the ``Sergeant Kenneth Eric 
                         Bostic Post Office''.
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANJEET KAUR,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 06-72398

Agency No. A079-245-428

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Ranjeet Kaur, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen based on

ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

SEP 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 06-72398

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Mohammed v.

Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in concluding that equitable tolling was

unavailable for Kaur’s claims because she failed to demonstrate diligence where

she admitted to knowing that counsel was unprepared at the time of her hearing,

but continued to retain his services throughout the appellate process. See 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.2(c)(2); Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003) (tolling

available to individuals who are prevented from filing due to deception, fraud or

error, and use due diligence in discovering deception, fraud or error). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SIDNEY MARTS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-00015-SPM -GRJ

P BELLELIS, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff has filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice pursuant to

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. (Doc. 3). The Court finds that Plaintiff’s Notice, construed as a

motion for voluntary dismissal, is due to be GRANTED. If Plaintiff did not voluntarily

dismiss this cause, the complaint would have been subject to dismissal because

Plaintiff has been identified as an abusive filer and a “three-striker” under 28 U.S.C. §

1915(g), and he did not acknowledge this prior history on his complaint or submit the

filing fee when he initiated this lawsuit. See Marts v. Chance, Case No. 3:08cv537-

MCR-MD. (Doc. 51). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

That Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. 3), construed as a motion to 

dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 is GRANTED and this cause is DISMISSED 

WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7 day of March, 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
Exhibit 32.02



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Rachel L. Dillard,
Chief Financial Officer of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc.



|                      |        |                        
|--------------------- | ------ | -----------------------
|                      | By:    | /s/ RACHEL L. DILLARD  
|Date: August 14, 2012 | Name:  | Rachel L. Dillard      
|                      | Title: | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Optio Software, Inc. (the Company)
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Caroline Bembry, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting
officer) of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1). | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 29, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Caroline Bembry    
|                     |  |     |  | Caroline Bembry        
|                     |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the annual report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be deemed to be a separate disclosure document.
H. R. 5395 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 116 Main 

Street in Dansville, New York, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Alexandria Gleason-Morrow 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT ALEXANDRIA GLEASON-MORROW POST 

OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 116 Main Street in Dansville, New York, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Alexandria Gleason-Morrow Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Alexandria Gleason-Morrow Post Office 

Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

THE SUMMIT OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

INC., a Florida not-for-profit organization,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-273-RS-GRJ

DONALD JESSIE ELLIOT, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-59-RS-GRJ

CLARA HOLLOWAY, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18). 

No objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

Case 5:11-cv-00059-RS-GRJ Document 19 Filed 02/09/12 Page 1 of 2
2. The Motion to Dismiss Former Trustee Donald J. Elliot as 

Defendant (Doc. 13) is DENIED. 

3. Defendant Donald J. Elliot shall file an answer to the amended 

complaint not later than February 20, 2012.

4. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 15) is DENIED.

ORDERED on February 9, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00059-RS-GRJ Document 19 Filed 02/09/12 Page 2 of 2