alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 73777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6248]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, January 11, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person For More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-6248 Filed 12-26-07; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
**Exhibit 23.2**





**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




The
      Board
      of Directors


XTL
      Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.


Rehovot


Israel




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
      333-141529 and No. 333-147024) on Form F-3 and the registration statements
      (No.333-148085 and No. 333-148754) on Form S-8 of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd
      (a
      Development Stage Company) of our report dated May 3, 2005, with respect to
      the
      consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and
      cash
      flows of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (a Development Stage Company) and its
      subsidiary for the period from March 9, 1993 to December 31, 2000, which
      report appears in the December 31, 2007, annual report on Form 20-F of XTL
      Biopharmaceuticals Ltd (a Development Stage Company).





Somekh
      Chaikin


Certified
      Public Accountants(Isr.)


(A
      member
      firm of KPMG International)




Tel
      Aviv,
      Israel


March
      27,
      2008
TYPES OF RESPIRATORY PROTECTION

Elastomeric Half Facepiece 

Respirators are reusable and have 

replaceable cartridges or filters. 

They cover the nose and mouth 

and provide protection against 

gases, vapors, or particles when 

equipped with the appropriate 

cartridge or filter.

Elastomeric Full Facepiece 

Respirators are reusable and have 

replaceable canisters, cartridges, 

or filters. The facepiece covers 

the face and eyes, which offers 

eye protection.

! WARNING

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, 

consectetur adipiscing elit. Nullam 

scelerisque leo et eros convallis 

condimentum. Phasellus tincidunt, 

volutpat vitae.

Filtering Facepiece Respirators

are disposable half facepiece 

respirators that filter out particles 

such as dusts, mists, and fumes. 

They do NOT provide protection 

against gases and vapors.

Powered Air-Purifying Respirators (PAPRs)

have a battery-powered blower that pulls 

air through attached filters, canisters, or 

cartridges. They provide protection against 

gases, vapors, or particles, when equipped 

with the appropriate cartridge, canister, or 

filter. Loose-fitting PAPRs do not require fit 

testing and can be used with facial hair.

Supplied-Air Respirators are connected to a separate 

source that supplies clean compressed air through 

a hose. They can be lightweight and used while 

working for long hours in environments not 

immediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH). 

Example of an open-circuit SCBA

Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBAs) are 

used for entry into or escape from environments 

considered to be IDLH. They contain their own 

breathing air supply and can be either open circuit 

or closed circuit. 

Example of an SAR/SCBA

Combination Respirators can be either a supplied-air/

SCBA respirator or supplied-air/air-purifying respirator. 

The SCBA type has a self-contained air supply if primary 

airline fails and can be used in IDLH environments. The 

air-purifying type offers protection using both a suppliedair hose & an air-purifying component and cannot be 

used for entry into IDLH environments.

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health September 2019
� ..-... � �� 

�

�� �_) 

� � 

Los estilos de vello facial y los respiradores 

con mascarilla de filtrado 

0 e e e ij s 

Completamente 

afeitado Barba de 3 dias Barba media Barba larga Tenedor trances Cola de pato Verdi Garibaldi Bandholz

� X X X X X X X X 

0 "WI ,w- 0 � ,w- 0 � IC' 0 'S' IC' 0 'S' ,w- 0� IC' 0'S' ,.... 0� ,.... s

Parche de ment6n Chivita Cortina de ment6n Chivita extensa Redondeada Anda Balbo Van Dyke Imperial (jCuidado! La barba del ment6n 

puede salirse facilmente por � d ol 

X X X salirse 

(jCuidado! 

facilmente 

La barba 

por 

del 

debajo 

ment6n 

del 

puede 

sello) X X

0 0".S' ,.... 0� ,.... 0'C) ,.... 0� ,.... 0� ,wn 

Patillas Cordero alfa Hulihee Herradura Zappa Morsa Brocha Chevron Manubrio 

� X X (Cuidado que no salga por 

debajo del sello) � � � 

0......., � 0'9' � 0'9' � 0� ,.... 0"C) ,.... 0'S' (II' 0'C' ,.... 0� IC' 0'C' �

.-J"-... 

Lapiz Cepillo de dientes Pantalla de lampara Zorro Villano Fu Manchu Ingles Dali 

(Cuidado que no salga por 

debajo del sello) X X X 

Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention 

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health 

noviembre 2017

*Si su respirador tiene valvula de exhalaci6n, algunos de estos estilos podrfan interferir con el correcto funcionamiento de la valvula si el vello facial entra en contacto con ella. 

tEsta grafica quizas no incluya todos los estilos de vello facial. lndependientemente del estilo que se use, el vello no debe pasar por debajo de la superficie de sellado del 

respirador. 

Fuente: OSHA Respiratory protection standard 

https:/ /www.osha.gov/S LTC/ resp i ratoryprotection/ standards. h tm I 

Mas informaci6n para leer: Sitio web de NIOSH de recurses confiables sabre respiradores 

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/disp_part/RespSource.html
# C_2010333EN.01000701.xml

| 10.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 333/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 333/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5998 — BDMI/FCPI/Blue Lion Mobile)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 333/05

On 23 November 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5998. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5998. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Case 3:11-cv-00060-MCR-CJK Document 421 Filed 07/22/14 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:11-cv-00060-MCR-CJK Document 421 Filed 07/22/14 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011115EN.01000401.xml

| 13.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 April 2011

2011/C 115/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4470 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,87 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4584 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88845 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0822 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3017 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8770 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,448 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,35 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9733 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1150 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1938 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3783 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3864 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2485 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8409 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8184 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 580,16 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6942 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,4638 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3670 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 520,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3793 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,424 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6625 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,613 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2859 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0312 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,2310 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4470

JPY

Japanese yen

121,87

DKK

Danish krone

7,4584

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88845

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0822

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3017

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8770

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,448

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,35

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9733

RON

Romanian leu

4,1150

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1938

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3783

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3864

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2485

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8409

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8184

KRW

South Korean won

1 580,16

ZAR

South African rand

9,6942

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,4638

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3670

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 520,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3793

PHP

Philippine peso

62,424

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6625

THB

Thai baht

43,613

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2859

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0312

INR

Indian rupee

64,2310

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00041-CR

MILTON LEE GARDNER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 77th District Court

Limestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13074-A

ORDER

Appellant’s Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Motion for 

Rehearing is granted. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is due November 5, 2015.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed November 5, 2015
# C_2010162EN.01000501.xml

| 22.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 June 2010

2010/C 162/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2391 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,10 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4402 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83410 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5178 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3738 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8575 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,760 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,03 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7083 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0380 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2315 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9233 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4032 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2601 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6296 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7349 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7044 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 454,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2406 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4229 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2010 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 163,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9484 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,350 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,1375 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,011 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,1772 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,4500 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 56,6900 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2391

JPY

Japanese yen

113,10

DKK

Danish krone

7,4402

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83410

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5178

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3738

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8575

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,760

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,03

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7083

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0380

RON

Romanian leu

4,2315

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9233

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4032

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2601

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6296

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7349

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7044

KRW

South Korean won

1 454,28

ZAR

South African rand

9,2406

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4229

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2010

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 163,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9484

PHP

Philippine peso

56,350

RUB

Russian rouble

38,1375

THB

Thai baht

40,011

BRL

Brazilian real

2,1772

MXN

Mexican peso

15,4500

INR

Indian rupee

56,6900

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
322 S.E.2d 709

#### STATE of West Virginia ex rel. Robert Julian TAYLOR v. The Honorable A. Andrew MacQUEEN, Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County.

No. 16477.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Nov. 14, 1984.

*78Michael S. Francis, Brennan & Francis, New Martinsville, for relator.

No appearance for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This original proceeding in mandamus came on this day for decision upon the verified petition of the relator, Robert Julian Taylor, upon the rule to show cause issued by this Court on October 3, 1984, upon the brief of the relator and upon the exhibits filed herein. Upon consideration of all of which, this Court finds and concludes as follows:

On June 12, 1980, the relator filed an appeal of an administrative decision of the Department of Public Safety Board of Appeals with the respondent Judge of the Circuit Court of Kanawha County. The respondent allowed the appeal, and the appeal was prosecuted. In October 1982, Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were filed with the respondent, and the case was submitted for decision. The respondent indicated that a ruling would be made before the end of February, 1983. Despite the passage of considerable time, no decision has yet been rendered in the case.

Section 17 of Article III of our Constitution provides, in part, that “justice shall be administered without ... delay.” In *State ex rel. Cackowska v. Knapp,*147 W.Va. 699, 130 S.E.2d 204 (1963), this Court held that a delay of seventeen months in rendering a decision on a writ of error to an order of a commissioner of accounts was unreasonable and justified the issuance of a writ of mandamus commanding the court to issue a decision. More recently in *State ex rel. Patterson v. Aldredge,*173 W.Va. 446, 317 S.E.2d 805 (1984), we found that a trial court’s delay of thirty-three months in ruling on a motion for summary judgment was “unreasonable.” We are of the opinion that the approximately two-year delay of the respondent in ruling in the case before us. is unreasonable. We conclude that the relator has established all the legal prerequisites for the issuance of a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the respondent judge to issue a final decision in the relator’s appeal.

It is, therefore, Adjudged and Ordered that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue commanding the respondent to render a final decision in the relator’s appeal within twenty days from and after the date of this Order. It is further Adjudged and Ordered that service of an attested copy of this Order upon the respondent shall have the same force and effect as the service of a formal writ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHANDRA STRAW,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-102/RS-CJK

AQUATIC ADVENTURES 

MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.,

d/b/a AQUATIC ADVENTURES, 

a Florida Corporation, 

Defendant. 

__________________________________/ 

ORDER

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), the court, on its own initiative, strikes as 

immaterial all references in the Complaint to John Doe as a fictitious defendant. Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure and federal statutes do not provide for the use of fictitious 

names of unknown parties in actions filed in United States District Courts. Allegations 

against fictitious parties fail to show the requisite case or controversy for jurisdiction in 

this court. See, e.g., New v. Sports & Rec., 114 F.3d 1092, 1094 n.1 (11th Cir. 1997). 

The clerk is directed to terminate Defendant John Doe as a party to this suit. 

ORDERED on October 19, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00102-RS-CJK Document 27 Filed 10/19/11 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 28 (Monday, February 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6575-6576]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-637]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. March 1; and 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 
p.m. March 2, 2007.

PLACE: Department of the Interior Auditorium, 1849 C Street, NW. 
Washington, DC 20240.

STATUS: The Department of the Interior, as co-chair with the Department 
of Commerce, on behalf of the U.S. Coral Reef Task Force, announces a 
public meeting of the Task Force.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Updates on implementation of Local Action 
Strategies, including a focus on selected issues and future needs; 
consideration of alternative non-regulatory approaches to coral reef 
conservation; member accomplishments; and public comments on coral reef 
issues generally. The agenda will be available from the contact person 
below and published on the Task Force Web site at http://www.coralreef.gov when finalized.

REGISTRATION AND EXHIBITS: There is no charge to attend this meeting. 
Limited space is also available for those desiring to have exhibits. 
Registration information for attendance and for exhibits, along with 
information on rooms, parking and related items, is available on the 
Task Force Web site noted above. Exhibits must be registered well in 
advance of the meeting.

[[Page 6576]]


CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Those desiring to obtain 
additional information should contact Randal Bowman at the office of 
the Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife Parks, Department of the 
Interior, 1849 C Street NW., MS-MIB-3156, Attn: CRTF, Washington, DC 
20240, telephone 202-219-1037, e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a685b545e5b566578554d575b547a535549145e5553145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97c5f6f9f3f6fbc8d5f8e0faf6f9d7fef8e4b9f3f8feb9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>; or 
consult the above Web site.

PUBLIC COMMENTS: Written statements of any length may be submitted to 
the Task Force at the above address, or delivered to the Task Force 
staff at the meeting. Those desiring to testify before the Task Force 
should register to do so at the meeting, and should summarize their 
actual statements in 5 minutes. All written statements will be 
considered in their entirety. Wherever possible, those with similar 
viewpoints or messages are encouraged to make joint statements. 
Comments will be received on the afternoon of March 1.

    Dated: January 26, 2007.
David M. Verhey,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 07-637 Filed 2-8-07; 12:47 pm]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
99-10

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Aspen Group Resources Corp. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert Calentine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Robert Calentine

Robert Calentine

Chief Executive Officer

April 29, 2005





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in the typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









---



99-10

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Aspen Group Resources Corp. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Allen Thorne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(3)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Allan Thorne

Allan Thorne

Chief Executive Officer

April 29, 2005





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in the typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5 4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20560 Conference Calendar

EUGENIO L. RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; EVANS, Sgt., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA H 94-2933

- - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1997 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eugenio L. Rodriguez, Texas prisoner # 382692, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, in which he alleged that he had been denied adequate medical care. Rodriguez argues that the district court erred when it entered into an agreement with the Unit Warden, without his knowledge or consent, and thatNo. 96-20560 - 2 - the court did not allow him to present evidence in support of his claims. Allegations made at a hearing conducted pursuant to Spears
v. McCotter , 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985), supersede the allegations contained in the complaint. Riley v. Collins , 828 F.2d 306, 307 (5th Cir. 1987). Rodriguez did not raise at the Spears hearing the claims in his original complaint about the treatment he had received after his back surgery. Rodriguez instead described his inability to get medical treatment for his leg, and he stated that he was seeking only treatment for his leg. The district court granted Rodriguez the relief that he had requested. Accordingly, the district court committed no error, and its judgment is AFFIRMED.