alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 73857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine;

    Notice of Closed Meetings.
    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, G13 SEP.
    Date: February 1, 2008.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military 
Road, NW., Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Zoe E. Huang, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, MSC 
7968, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, (301) 594-4937, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aec6dbcfc0c9d4eec3cfc7c280c0c7c680c9c1d8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="422a37232c2538022f232b2e6c2c2b2a6c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis 
Panel, R01-G08-R21 SEP.
    Date: February 6, 2008.
    Time: 12:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 
301, Bethesda, MD 20817.
    Contact Person: Zoe E. Huang, MD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, Rockledge 1 
Building, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 
(301) 594-4937, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6b031e0a050c112b060a020745050203450c041d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fa928f9b949d80ba979b9396d4949392d49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medicine Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 18, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-6183 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BPZ Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Randall D. Keys, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/ Randall D. Keys*   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Randall D. Keys         |
| Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |
| March 31, 2006          |

 

----
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-92,551-01

EX PARTE ANGEL MEDINA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1588954-A IN THE 184 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to forty

years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. SeeTEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel told him he would

receive probation if he pleaded guilty. He also contends that counsel did not investigate or present

punishment evidence. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v.

Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013).

Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings

of fact. TEX.CODECRIM.PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). According to Applicant’s motion to remand, trial
2

counsel is deceased. If a response from counsel is impossible, the trial court shall determine whether

counsel’s file from this case is available for inspection. In developing the record, the trial court may

use anymeans set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d), including the court’s personal recollection. It appears

that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine

if Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is

indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorneyto represent

Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whethertrial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged

deficient performance. The trial court shall also make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to

whether trial counsel was ineffective for not discovering and presenting mitigation evidence. The

trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to

Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: June 23, 2021

Do not publish
#### STATE v. WHITLEY

No. 526P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 539.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1982. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 October 1982.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 32 (Friday, February 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-737]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-08: OTS Nos. 18040 and H-4364]


CMS Bancorp, Inc., White Plains, New York; Approval of Conversion 
Application

    Notice is hereby given that on February 12, 2007, the Assistant 
Managing Director, Examinations and Supervision--Operations, Office of 
Thrift Supervision, or her designee, acting pursuant to delegated 
authority, approved the application of Community Mutual Savings Bank, 
White Plains, New York, to convert to the stock form of organization. 
Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment 
(phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail:) at the Public Reading Room, 
1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Northeast 
Regional Office, Harborside Financial Center Plaza Five, Suite 1600, 
Jersey City, New Jersey 07311.

    Dated: February 13, 2007.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Legal Information Assistant.
[FR Doc. 07-737 Filed 2-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
exhibit_10-5.htm










Exhibit 10.5


 


ADDENDUM TO THE CONSULTING AGREEMENT


 


This Second Addendum (the “Second Addendum”) to the Consulting Agreement dated September 23, 2008 (the “Agreement”), by and between WIN GLOBAL MARKETS INCORPORATED, a corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada with its offices located at 103 Foulk Rd., Wilmington, DE 19803, USA (the “Company”) and Citron Investments Ltd., an Israeli Private Company Number 512083270, having its principal place of business at 4 Ovadia Street, Ramat Gan 52245, Israel (“Consultant”), is made as of the 1 day of November, 2013.


 


WHEREAS the Company and the Consultant, who entered into the Agreement, wish to amend the Agreement under the terms as provided herein; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 




	1. 	All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.
	 	 
	2. 	The parties agree that, notwithstanding section 2.1 to the Agreement, effective as of January 1, 2013 (the “Effective Date”), the Monthly Fee shall be raised to Twenty Thousand United States Dollars (US$20,000) totaling US$240,000 per year. 
	 	 
	3. 	The parties also agree that effective as of the Effective Date, the Company shall reimburse the Consultant for: (i) car expenses in the amount of One Thousand One Hundred and Fifty United States Dollars (US$1,150) per month; 
	 	 
	4. 	The parties hereto agree that, commencing on August 1, 2013 and as long as the Agreement shall be in effect, the Consultant shall be entitled to receive from the Company, in addition to the other payments under the Agreement, a monthly bonus equal to 1.25% (one percent and twenty five hundredths of percent) of the Net Deposits (as defined below) that shall be generated during such month. Such amount shall be calculated and payable on a monthly basis together with the Monthly Fee. 
	 	 
	 	
The term “Net Deposits” means, with respect to each calendar month, the aggregate deposits that shall be made into the trading platform operated through the Internet websites EZTrader.com and GlobalOption.com and/or any other Internet websites that shall be operated by any subsidiary, affiliate and/or parent company of the Company (the “Trading Platform”) during such month, less all the withdrawals that shall be made from the Trading Platform during such month less transaction fees (such as processing fees and banking fees) and less charge-backs made during such month with respect to funds deposited into the Trading Platform.


	 	 
	5.	All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Addendum through their duly authorized signatories as of the date set forth above.


 



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	  WIN GLOBAL MARKETS INCORPORATED.	 	
  Citron Investments Ltd.


	
  By:

	 	
 

	 	

  By:



	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	  Its:	 	 	 	
  Its:
Page 1 of 3

Case No. 4:11cr31-RH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 4:11cr31-RH

JIMMY D. HOWARD,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER TERMINATING SUPERVISED RELEASE

The defendant Jimmy D. Howard has moved for early termination of 

supervised release. The government has responded in opposition. 

A court may order early termination after a defendant has served at least one 

year on supervised release, but only if early termination is warranted by the

defendant’s conduct and the interest of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). Mr. 

Howard has served nearly four years on supervised release and thus, as the 

government acknowledges, is eligible for early termination. The Judicial 

Conference of the United States has approved Monograph 109 suggesting earlytermination considerations.

Case 4:11-cr-00031-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 08/08/19 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 4:11cr31-RH

The record establishes that Mr. Howard has maintained a stable residence, 

employment, and family life. He has had only minor violations—once leaving the 

district without permission, and briefly discontinuing his monthly restitution 

payments, until reprimanded by the probation officer. No violation proceedings 

have been initiated.

The government opposes early termination, noting the scope of the fraud 

that resulted in this conviction and emphasizing errors in Mr. Howard’s motion for 

early termination. The motion asserts complete compliance with the conditions of 

supervision and does not acknowledge the violations noted above. It is true, 

though, that he has not been charged with any violation.

Mr. Howard served a substantial term in the Bureau of Prisons and 

apparently is back on track. At some point Mr. Howard will have to go forward 

without supervision. There is little reason to believe his chance of success will be 

significantly different in 13 months—at the scheduled termination date—than the 

chance of success is today. The probation department’s finite resources can best be 

used supervising others.

I have considered the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and the criteria in 

Monograph 109. I find that terminating supervised release at this time is warranted 

by Mr. Howard’s conduct and the interest of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). 

Accordingly,

Case 4:11-cr-00031-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 08/08/19 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 4:11cr31-RH

IT IS ORDERED:

Mr. Howard’s term of supervised release is terminated as of August 8, 2019, 

at 11:11 a.m.

SO ORDERED on August 8, 2019.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:11-cr-00031-RH-WCS Document 63 Filed 08/08/19 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TERRY L ROBINSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-99-RH-GRJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

__________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 8, an amended pro se petition for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner has been granted leave to

proceed as a pauper, and has filed sufficient copies of the Petition for service.

Pursuant to § 2243, the United States Attorney will be required to file an answer

or other appropriate response. Petitioner shall be afforded an opportunity to file a reply. 

Upon receipt and review of the Respondent’s response, any exhibits, and Petitioner’s

reply, the Court will determine whether an evidentiary hearing is warranted. See Rule

8, Habeas Rules. If the Court determines that an evidentiary hearing is not warranted

under Rule 8 and the record is sufficient to resolve the petition, then the Court will

recommend disposition of the Petition on the basis of the record presented. See id. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Clerk shall furnish by certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy of the

Amended Petition, Doc. 8, and this order to the Respondent, the United States

Attorney General, and the United States Attorney for this district, who shall file an

answer on or before November 12, 2011. 

Case 5:11-cv-00099-RH-GRJ Document 12 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2.. Petitioner shall have until December 12, 2011, to file a reply, if desired.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13 day of September 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 5:11-cv-99-RH-GRJ

Case 5:11-cv-00099-RH-GRJ Document 12 Filed 09/13/11 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. NEWKIRK

No. 83 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 53.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 May 1972.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5355 

To amend chapter 77 of title 5, United States Code, to clarify certain 

due process rights of Federal employees serving in sensitive positions, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2018 

Ms. NORTON (for herself, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, and Mr. WITTMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 77 of title 5, United States Code, to 

clarify certain due process rights of Federal employees 

serving in sensitive positions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS. 

4 Section 7701 of title 5, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsection (k) as sub7 section (l); and 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (j) the fol9 lowing: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5355 IH

1 ‘‘(k)(1) An employee or applicant for employment ap2 pealing an action arising from a determination of ineligi3 bility for a sensitive position may not be denied Board re4 view of the merits of such determination if— 

5 ‘‘(A) the position is not one that requires a se6 curity clearance or access to classified information; 

7 and 

8 ‘‘(B) such action is otherwise appealable. 

9 ‘‘(2) For purposes of this subsection, the term ‘sen10 sitive position’ means any position so designated pursuant 

11 to Executive Order 10450 (5 U.S.C. 7311 note) or, if su12 perseded, a successor Executive order.’’. 

13 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

14 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to all 

15 appeals, without exception, that are pending on, or com16 menced on or after, the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7076-7077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-660]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service, Interior


Concession Contract and Permits

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior

ACTION: Public notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 36 CFR 51.23, public notice is hereby given that 
the National Park Service proposes to extend the following expiring 
concession contracts for a period of up to 1 year, or until such time 
as a new contract is executed, whichever occurs sooner.

DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo A. Pendry, Concession Program 
Manager, National Park Service, Washington, DC 20240, Telephone 202/
513-7156.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The listed concession authorizations will 
expire by their terms on or before December 31, 2006. The National Park 
Service has determined that the proposed short-term extensions are 
necessary in order to avoid interruption of visitor services and has 
taken all reasonable and appropriate steps to consider alternatives to 
avoid such interruption. these extensions will allow the National Park 
Service to complete and issue a prospectus leading to the competitive 
selection of a concessioner for a new long-term concession contract 
covering these operations.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Conc ID No.            Concession name               Park
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CANY031-02.............  Holiday River            Canyonlands National
                          Expeditions, Inc.        Park.
CANY032-02.............  Escape Adventures, Inc.  Canyonlands National
                                                   Park.
CANY033-02.............  Mike & Maggie            Canyonlands National
                          Adventures, LLC.         Park.
CANY034-02.............  Rim Tours, Inc.........  Canyonlands National
                                                   Park.
CANY035-02.............  Western Spirit Cycling,  Canyonlands National
                          Inc.                     Park.
GLAC002-81.............  Glacier Park, Inc......  Glacier National Park.
GRTE022-02.............  Jenny Lake Boating, Inc  Grand Teton National
                                                   Park.
YELL001-03.............  Medcor, Inc............  Yellowstone National
                                                   Park.
------------------------------------------------------------------------



[[Page 7077]]

    Dated: December 16, 2006.
John Wessels,
Acting Assistant Director, Business Services.
[FR Doc. 07-660 Filed 2-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-53-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cr-00047-MP -GRJ

DANIEL EDWIN WARWICK,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 39, Motion for Pretrial Release filed by Daniel

Edwin Warwick. Defendant Warwick moves the Court to release him from confinement pending

trial upon a $50,000 unsecured bond, pursuant to GPS Monitoring, to the supervision of the

Pretrial Services Office of the Northern District of Florida. The government filed an objection to

the motion for pretrial release. On April 15, 2011 the Court held an in-court hearing on the

motion.

In determining whether there are conditions of release that will reasonably assure the

appearance of the defendant and the safety of any other person and the community, the Court

shall consider the nature and circumstances of the offense charged, the weight of the evidence,

the history and characteristics of the person accused, and the nature and seriousness of the

danger to any person or the community that would be posed by the person’s release. See 18

U.S.C. § 3142(g). If, after a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the Court finds that no

condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the appearance of the person and

the safety of any other person and the community, the Court shall order the detention of the
Page 2 of 2

person before trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e).

In the instant case, the Defendant poses a risk of nonappearance based on the nature of

the offense charged and his criminal history, which include a prior escape. Defendant’s criminal

history, history of violent behavior, and nature of the offense charged indicate that the Defendant

poses a danger to the community. As such, there are no conditions or combination of conditions

to reasonably assure either the Defendant’s appearance in Court or the safety of the community. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Motion for Pretrial Release, Doc. 39, is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of April, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:10-cr-00047-MP -GRJ