alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Report of Independent Public Accountants


To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted
auditing standards, the consolidated financial statements of
Household Finance Corporation (the "Company") and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and have issued our
report thereon dated January 21, 1998.  We have not audited
any financial statements of the Company as of any date or
for any period subsequent to December 31, 1997, or performed
any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report on
those statements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention
that caused us to believe that the Company was not in
compliance with any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or
conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the
"Agreement"), dated November 1, 1996, in conjunction with
the Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates
Series 1996-2 insofar as they relate to accounting matters. 
It should be noted, however, that our audit was not directed
primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of
the Company's system of internal accounting controls over
the Company's home equity loan portfolio, including those
loans serviced under the Agreement to the extent we
considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by
generally accepted auditing standards.  In accordance with
these standards, the purpose of our study and evaluation,
which included obtaining an understanding of the accounting
systems, was to determine the nature, timing and extent of
the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion
on the financial statements.  Our study and evaluation also
took into consideration certain of the criteria and audit
requirements in the Audit Guide for Audits of Non-Supervised
Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development.  However, certain procedures included in the
audit guide are not applicable to the home equity loans
being serviced for the Trustee, and therefore, were not
performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records
relating to home equity loans serviced for the Trustee that,
in our opinion, Section 3.10 of the Agreement required us to
report.

This report is intended solely for the information and use
of the Board of Directors and management of the Company and
should not be used for any other purpose.



Chicago, Illinois
January 21, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 73037]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6170]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental & Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal policy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Special Emphasis Panel, Review R01.
    Date: January 17, 2008.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Jonathan Horsford, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, NIDCR, 45 Center Drive, 4AN-24E, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-
594-4859, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b232439382d2439210b262a222765252223652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d3bbbca1a0b5bca1b993beb2babffdbdbabbfdb4bca5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 17, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-6170 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 4.95
 
 
 Subscription Agreement
 
 DRDGOLD (SOUTH AFRICAN OPERATIONS) PTY LTD DRDGOLD LIMITED


SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
 
 This agreement
    DRDGold (South African Operations) (Pty) Ltd
 "the
 Company"
  DRDGold Limited
  "DRD"
  Recitals
         Interpretation
      “the Consideration Shares”
   "Completion"
  "Encumbrance"
   "Shares"
  "Subscription Price"
   "Subscription Shares"


"Warranties"
                           Subscription
           Completion


Warranties
            Confidentiality
                  Duration and Termination


Announcements
           Further Assurance
     General


Notices
                           Governing Law
         Counterparts


Schedule 1
 Warranties
   Corporate
          Subscription Shares and Title to Shares


This agreement
           MP Ncholo Chairman
 The Company
   DRDGOLD SA
      Signed by:
       DRDGOLD Limited
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

TIMOTHY KELLEY,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00464-MP -WCS

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 9, Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time to

File Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Previously, the Court adopted the Report

and Recommendation, to which no objections were filed, and denied the petition. Mr. Kelley

now informs the Court that he was in lock-down during this period and was unable to respond. 

Giving Mr. Kelley the benefit of the doubt, the Court vacates the order and judgment and

reopens the case. Mr. Kelley shall file objections to the Report and Recommendation by Friday,

June 17, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00464-MP-WCS Document 10 Filed 05/17/11 Page 1 of 1
WORKING IN COLD

When using SCBA and working in cold:
+ Refer to SCBA user instructions

* Talk to your SCBA manufacturer

* Talk to your breathing air compressor manufacturer

Why?

To reduce the risk of freeze ups
leading to out-of-air emergencies
due to breathing-air moisture and
environmental contamination.

Reference: https://www.usfa.fema.gov/downloads/pdf/publications/tr-088.pdf
Exhibit 10.14

 

[Proteon Therapeutics Letterhead]

 

January 12, 2009

 

F. Nicholas Franano, M.D.

1010 W. 69th Terr.

Kansas City, Missouri 64113

 

Re:                 U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/155,938

U.S. Patent Application No. 09/669,051

International Patent Application No. PCT/US00/26237

 

Dear Nick:

 

This letter confirms that by accepting your December 30, 2002 assignment of rights to the inventions disclosed in the above-referenced patent applications (the “Invention”), Proteon Therapeutics, LLC (i) agreed to comply with the terms of the Assignment of Rights/License Agreement between Nicholas Franano and the Johns Hopkins University dated March 25, 2002 (the “JHU Agreement”) and (ii) assumed your obligations arising from the JHU Agreement (the “Franano Obligations”), including the obligation to honor the provisions imposed by the federal government sponsor of the research underlying the Invention (the “Bayh-Dole Obligations”).

 

This letter further confirms that upon merger of Proteon Therapeutics, LLC into Proteon Therapeutics, Inc. on March 27, 2006, Proteon Therapeutics Inc. acquiesced to the terms of the JHU Agreement and assumed the Franano Obligations, including the Bayh-Dole Obligations.

 

	
Sincerely,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/Timothy P.   Noyes
    	
 
    
	
Timothy P. Noyes
    	
 
    
	
President and   Chief Executive Officer
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA , Respondent
,

v.

KEITH H. KRENKLIS , Petitioner

.
No. 1 CA

- CR 18

- 0712 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2015

- 135529

- 001 The Honorable Jose S. Padilla
, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL
Maricopa County Attorney ' s Office , Phoenix By Gerald R. Grant Counsel for Respondent

Keith H. Krenklis
, Florence Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge James B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court, in which Judge Jon W. Thompson and Vice Chief Judge Peter B. Swann joined. FILED 2-19-2019STATE v. KRENKLIS Decision of the Court

2 M O R S E , Judge:

¶1 Petitioner Keith Krenklis petitions this court for review from the dismissal of his of

- right petition for post

- conviction relief (" PCR " ) pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1

. F or the reasons stated, we grant review but deny relief.
¶2 Krenklis pleaded guilty to three offenses, including two counts of attempted molestation of a child. In his petition for PCR, he claimed his convictions violated the federal constitution because A.R.S. § 13

- 1407(E) ( 2017) impermissibly shifted the burden of proof to the defendant

. The superior court denied this claim. In his petition for review, Krenklis raises the same claim.
¶3 We will not disturb a superior court ' s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief unless the court abused its discre tion. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). The petitioner has the burden to show the court abused its discretion. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011).

¶4 Here, we find no abuse of discretion. Krenklis claims the
statu tes he violated unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof to the defendant by requiring the defendant to prove a lack of sexual motivation as an affirmative defense. In support, Krenklis cites May v. Ryan , 245 F. Supp. 3d 1145, 1164 (D. Ariz. 2017), which found the statutes to be unconstitutional. That opinion, however, is not binding on our C ourt. State v. Gates , 118 Ariz. 357, 359 (1978). Our state supreme court has found the child molestation statutes constitutional
, State v. Holle , 240 Ariz. 300, 308, ¶ 38 (2016) , and w e are bound by the decisions of our supreme court
, State v. Smyers , 207 Ariz. 314, 318, ¶ 15 , n.4 (2004). We find no error.

¶5 For the foregoing reasons, w e grant review but deny relief.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

      ( print page 6517)    

# Date and Time: 

Wednesday, February 14, 2007, 1:30-2 p.m.

# Place: 

Middle East Broadcasting Networks, Inc., 7600 Boston Blvd., Suite D, Springfield, VA 22153.

# Closed Meeting: 

The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will meet in closed session to review and discuss a number of issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international broadcasting. They will address internal procedural, budgetary, and personnel issues, as well as sensitive foreign policy issues relating to potential options in the U.S. international broadcasting field. This meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 U.S.C. 52b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)). In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6)).

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact Carol Booker at (202) 203-4545.

Dated: February 7, 2007

Carol Booker,

Legal Counsel.

[FR Doc. 07-630 Filed 2-8-07; 10:57 am]

BILLING CODE 8230-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Partition Design, Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Korsinsky, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  PARTITION DESIGN, INC.Date:  November 10, 2008By:/s/ Michael KorsinskyMichael KorsinskyPresident and Chief Executive Officer & Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FELIX ANTEQUERA RIVERA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv531-RH/WCS

ANDREW PREZENKOP,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER FOR TRANSFER

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 4. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida, Tampa Division. The clerk must take all steps necessary to

effect the transfer.

SO ORDERED on January 4, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
Presidential Documents

69135 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 234 

Thursday, December 6, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8209 of December 4, 2007 

National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On December 7, 1941, our Nation was viciously attacked at Pearl Harbor, 

America’s Pacific Fleet was battered and broken, and more than 2,400 American lives were lost. On National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day, America 

honors those brave individuals who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense 

of our homeland, and we recognize those veterans who with strength and 

resolve defended our Nation and advanced the cause of freedom during 

World War II. 

When it mattered most, an entire generation of Americans stepped forward 

to protect our freedom and to defend liberty. Their devotion to duty and 

willingness to serve a cause greater than self helped secure our future 

and our way of life. Liberty prevailed because of the sacrifice of these 

courageous patriots, and America and her allies preserved a world where 

democracy could flourish. Our Nation remains forever in the debt of these 

brave Americans. 

From the unprovoked attack at Pearl Harbor grew a steadfast resolve that 

has made America a defender of freedom around the world, and our mission 

continues as our men and women in uniform serve at home and in distant 

lands. Today, as we defend our Nation’s founding ideals, we pay special 

tribute to those who lost their lives at Pearl Harbor, honor our veterans 

of World War II, and celebrate the liberty that makes America a lasting 

symbol of hope to the world. 

The Congress, by Public Law 103–308, as amended, has designated December 

7 of each year as ‘‘National Pearl Harbor Remembrance Day.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim December 7, 2007, as National Pearl Harbor 

Remembrance Day. I encourage all Americans to observe this solemn occasion 

with appropriate ceremonies and activities. I urge all Federal agencies, interested organizations, groups, and individuals to fly the flag of the United 

States at half-staff this December 7 in honor of those who died as a result 

of their service at Pearl Harbor. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS3
69136 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 234 / Thursday, December 6, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day 

of December, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtysecond. 

[FR Doc. 07–5991 

Filed 12–5–07; 10:07 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS3GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
# C_2011236EN.01000602.xml

| 12.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6213 — Westfield/CPPIB/APG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 236/03

On 5 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6213. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6213. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 2 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
THIS NOTE HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS
AMENDED, AND IS TRANSFERABLE ONLY UPON THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN THE
  NOTE AGREEMENT REFERRED TO HEREIN.


                Promissory Note Due March 31, 2004

                                                                   $26,000.00

      GK INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, INC, a Delaware public corporation, (herein
called the "Maker") for value received, hereby promises to pay to DEANNA
SLATER, 10142 Valley Forge, Houston, Texas,  77042, or her registered assigns
("Holder"), the principal sum of twenty six thousand dollars ($26,000.00) and
annualized interest of 0 %.  Payment of the principal and interest of this
Note will be made by check on March 31, 2004 (unless extended) at the offices
of the Maker maintained in Houston, Texas, or mailed to the address of the
person entitled thereto as such address shall be provided to the Maker, in
such coin or currency of the United States of America.

      This Note shall be collateralized by four hundred thirty three thousand
three hundred sixteen  (433,316) shares of common stock in GK Intelligent
Systems, Inc. currently registered in the name of "GK Intelligent Systems".
Holder may, at its option, accept payment of all or part of the principal
portion of this Note in the form of the heretofore described common stock on a
pro rata basis using a price per share of six cents.  Holder may make this
election on or before the due date of March 31, 2004.

      No provision of this Note shall alter or impair the obligation of the
Maker, which is absolute and unconditional, to pay the principal of this Note
at the times, places and rate, and in the coin or currency, herein prescribed.

      The Note may be transferred upon surrender of this Note or registration
of transfer at the offices or agencies of the Maker in Houston, Texas duly
endorsed by, or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer in
substantially the form accompanying this Note duly executed by, the holder
hereof or his attorney duly authorized in writing, and thereupon one or more
new Notes, of authorized denominations and for the same aggregate principal
amount, will be issued to the designated transferee or transferees.

      Prior to due presentment of this Note for registration of transfer, the
Maker, and any agent of the Maker may treat the person in whose name this Note
is registered as the owner hereof for all purposes, whether or not this Note
be overdue, and neither the Maker nor any such agent shall be affected by
notice to the contrary.

      This Note represents the final agreement between the parties and may not
be contradicted by evidence of prior, contemporaneous, or subsequent oral
agreements of the parties.  There are no unwritten oral agreements between the
parties.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, GARY KIMMONS, CEO of GK Intelligent Systems, Inc.
has caused this instrument to be executed.

Dated:  December 31, 2003

                                  /s/ Gary Kimmons
                                  _________________________________________
                                  GARY KIMMONS, CEO, GK INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS