alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010286EN.01000401.xml

| 22.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 October 2010

2010/C 286/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4016 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4584 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89020 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2675 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3493 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1385 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,540 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7098 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9516 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3152 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9907 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4208 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4300 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8813 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8637 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8192 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 576,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6623 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3212 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3405 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 520,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3534 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,552 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,0028 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,859 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3517 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3126 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,0840 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4016

JPY

Japanese yen

113,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4584

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89020

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2675

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3493

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1385

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,540

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7098

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9516

RON

Romanian leu

4,3152

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9907

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4208

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4300

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8813

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8637

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8192

KRW

South Korean won

1 576,39

ZAR

South African rand

9,6623

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3212

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3405

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 520,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3534

PHP

Philippine peso

60,552

RUB

Russian rouble

43,0028

THB

Thai baht

41,859

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3517

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3126

INR

Indian rupee

62,0840

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
VI 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2267 

For the relief of Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CESAR 

4 CARLOS SILVA RODRIGUEZ. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez shall 

8 be eligible for the issuance of an immigrant visa or for 

9 adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted 

10 for permanent residence upon filing an application for 

11 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of that 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2267 IS

1 Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to lawful 

2 permanent resident. 

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Cesar Carlos Silva 

4 Rodriguez enters the United States before the filing dead5 line specified in subsection (c), Cesar Carlos Silva Rodri6 guez shall be considered to have entered and remained 

7 lawfully and shall be eligible for adjustment of status 

8 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

9 (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the enactment of this 

10 Act. 

11 (c) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub12 sections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for 

13 issuance of immigrant visas or the application for adjust14 ment of status are filed with appropriate fees within two 

15 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

16 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

17 Upon the granting of immigrant visas or permanent resi18 dence to Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez, the Secretary of 

19 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, 

20 during the current or next following fiscal year— 

21 (1) the total number of immigrant visas that 

22 are made available to natives of the country of birth 

23 of Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez under section 

24 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

25 U.S.C. 1153(a)); or 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2267 IS

1 (2) if applicable, the total number of immigrant 

2 visas that are made available to natives of the coun3 try of birth of Cesar Carlos Silva Rodriguez under 

4 section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

5 (e) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for 

6 the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You7 Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the 

8 latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 

9 Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

10 Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Senate 

11 Budget Committee, provided that such statement has been 

12 submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21


SUBSIDIARIES OF EEX CORPORATION:             STATE OF INCORPORATION/ORGANIZATION

EEX Operating LLC                            Delaware
EEX Operating L.P.                           Delaware
EEX Capital, Inc.                            Delaware
Enserch International Oil & Gas, Inc.        Texas
EEX International, Inc.                      Texas
Corpus Christi Energy Co.                    Delaware
Corpus Christi Hydrocarbons Co.              Delaware
Enserch Far East Ltd.                        Cayman Islands
EEX Asahan Ltd.                              Cayman Islands
EEX Turkey B.V.                              Netherlands
EEX New Zealand Ltd.                         Cayman Islands
EEX Exploration and Production Company LLC   Delaware
EEX E&P Company, L.P.                        Delaware
EEX Reserves Funding LLC                     Delaware
EEX Reserves Company LLC                     Delaware
EEX Natural Gas Company                      Delaware
EEX Gathering Company                        Delaware
EEX Pipeline Company, L.P.                   Delaware
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KELVIN FRAZIER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv98-SPM/WCS

EDWIN BUSS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for before the Court on the magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 17) and Order (doc. 22). Plaintiff has been

furnished a copy and has filed objections (doc. 26) pursuant to Title 28, United

States Code, Section 636(b)(1).

Despite the objections, I have determined that the report and

recommendation and order are correct and should be adopted. The issues in

this case are not novel or complex. Plaintiff should correct the deficiencies in his

complaint and demonstrate that he may be entitled to relief. When the Court

reviews the merits of the case, the need for counsel will be evaluated. At this

point, however, Plaintiff has not demonstrate that he is entitled to a preliminary

Case 4:11-cv-00098-SPM-WCS Document 30 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

injunction or that appointment of counsel is warranted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 17) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. The order (doc. 22)

denying appointment of counsel is affirmed.

2. This case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further

proceedings. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of June, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:11cv98-SPMWCS

Case 4:11-cv-00098-SPM-WCS Document 30 Filed 06/17/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2010237EN.01000101.xml

| 2.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 237/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 237/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

1,00 % on 1 September 2010

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 September 2010

2010/C 237/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2800 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 107,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4446 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83105 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3490 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2967 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9425 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,735 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 286,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9896 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2648 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9485 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4141 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3560 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9542 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8112 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7277 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 516,73 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4195 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7187 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2774 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 511,57 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0047 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,740 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,3572 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,903 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2369 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8128 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,9230 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2800

JPY

Japanese yen

107,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4446

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83105

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3490

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2967

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9425

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,735

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

286,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9896

RON

Romanian leu

4,2648

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9485

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4141

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3560

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9542

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8112

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7277

KRW

South Korean won

1 516,73

ZAR

South African rand

9,4195

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7187

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2774

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 511,57

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0047

PHP

Philippine peso

57,740

RUB

Russian rouble

39,3572

THB

Thai baht

39,903

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2369

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8128

INR

Indian rupee

59,9230

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Michael A. Mullen, certify that:

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of National Holdings Corporation; and  |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: January 28, 2020 | By:    | /s/ Michael A. Mullen       |
|------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|                   |   | **Michael A. Mullen**       |
|                   |   | **Chief Executive Officer** |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7261

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARTEZ COLEMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CR-01-506; CA-05-1229-3)

Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 25, 2006

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martez Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant United

States Attorney, Stacey Denise Haynes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Martez Coleman, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000)

motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find both that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Coleman has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6742** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. CLAUDE WENDELL BELLAMY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. ( 7:99

- cr - 00049

- F

- 1 )

Submitted : July 29, 2014 Decided: August 1, 2014

Before NIEMEYER , WYNN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Claude Wendell Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precede nt in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Claude Wendell Bellamy seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his motion for relief as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circu it justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the d istrict court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable cl aim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bellamy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Bellamy’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or3 successive § 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) newly discovered evidence that
. . . would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or (2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court , that was previously unavailable
. 28 U.S.C. § 22 55(h ) (2012)
. Bellamy ’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to fi le a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED
# C_2011235EN.01000101.xml

| 11.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6205 — Eli Lilly/Janssen Pharmaceutica animal health business assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 235/01

On 6 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6205. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6205. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SAM J. PEARSON, IV,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv390/LAC/CJK

CORRY FLEETION,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May 9, 2011. (Doc. 13). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation,I have determined that the

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure

to comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

Case 3:10-cv-00390-LC-CJK Document 14 Filed 06/07/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 7 day of June, 2011.

th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv390/LAC/CJK

Case 3:10-cv-00390-LC-CJK Document 14 Filed 06/07/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

HOME DESIGN SERVICES INC,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00006-MP -GRJ

SHAWN BROWN, KERMIT CONSTRUCTION INC, NEW GENERATION HOME

BUILDERS INC, TONY S ROSS, ROBERT T SHEWEY,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 32, Unopposed Motion for Insurance Adjuster to

Attend Mediation Telephonically. The motion is granted. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of June, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00006-MP-GRJ Document 34 Filed 06/01/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting
Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Daniel L. Scharre, the Chief Executive Officer of Larscom Incorporated (the Company), and Donald W. Morgan, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



The
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the Periodic Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



The information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:    March 12, 2003



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/    Daniel L. Scharre                 
|Daniel L. Scharre Chief Executive Officer