alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         636,504
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,132,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                   298,570
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,812,566
<PP&E>                                         480,821
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,451,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,209,062
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,432,257
<COMMON>                                     3,906,890
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,396,897)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,451,312
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,570,347
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,017,174
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,740,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               304,278
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              84,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,393,420)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,395,020)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,395,020)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.28)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5280 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5280

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
 Federal Building and United States Courthouse'', and to designate the 
jury room in that Federal building and United States courthouse as the 
                   ``Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2018

 Mr. Cuellar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, as the ``George P. Kazen 
 Federal Building and United States Courthouse'', and to designate the 
jury room in that Federal building and United States courthouse as the 
                   ``Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUILDING DESIGNATION.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building and United States courthouse 
located at 1300 Victoria Street in Laredo, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed 
to be a reference to the ``George P. Kazen Federal Building and United 
States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. JURY ROOM DESIGNATION.

    (a) Designation.--The jury room located in the Federal building and 
United States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be known and 
designated as the ``Marcel C. Notzon II Jury Room''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the jury room referred 
to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Marcel 
C. Notzon II Jury Room''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RODELIN DEMPAIRE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cv96-SPM/GRJ

STEVEN DAVIS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW

This cause comes before the Court on Attorney’s Motion to Withdraw

From Representation of Plaintiff Rodelin Dempaire (doc. 133). Counsel states

that she has been unable to locate Plaintiff and cannot proceed with Plaintiff’s

claims against Defendants. Counsel indicates that she has provided at least ten

days’ notice to Plaintiff, as required by Local Rule 11.1(F), and no

communication or objection was received in response. The local rule also

requires that 10 days’ notice be provided to the other counsel of record. The

motion to withdraw was filed on April 23, 2012 using the CM/ECF system which

sends a notice of electronic filing to counsel of record. Accordingly, the other

counsel of record have received the required notice. Upon consideration, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Case 1:10-cv-00096-SPM-GRJ Document 140 Filed 05/10/12 Page 1 of 2
1. The Attorney’s Motion to Withdraw From Representation of Plaintiff

Rodelin Dempaire (doc. 133) is granted.

2. Attorney Amanda Caldwell and Florida Rural Legal Services are

relieved of further responsibility as counsel for Plaintiff in this case.

3. The clerk shall send a copy of this order to Plaintiff Rodelin

Dempaire, 831 NW 4 Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33311, by th

certified mail with return-receipt requested.

4. On or before May 23, 2012, Plaintiff Rodelin Dempaire shall

respond to this order by (1) filing a notice of appearance by his new

lawyer, (2) filing a request for more time to find a new lawyer along

with an explanation of why additional time is needed, or (3) filing a

written notice stating that he will proceed pro se, that is, to

represent himself in this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of May, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

-2-

Case 1:10-cv-00096-SPM-GRJ Document 140 Filed 05/10/12 Page 2 of 2
Presidential Documents

6917 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 29 

Tuesday, February 13, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of February 5, 2007 

Assignment of Functions Under Section 556 of the John 

Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2007 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws 

of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, 

I hereby assign to you the functions of the President under section 556 

of the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

2007 (Public Law 109–364). 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, February 5, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–697 

Filed 2–12–07; 11:11 am] 

Billing code 5000–04–M 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRO0GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Appellant**

**v.**

**KOREY C. HOLMES,**

**Appellee :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 72 MAP 2014** 

**Appeal from the Order of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas at No.**  **CP-46-CR-0009308-2012 dated June 4,**
**2014, entered June 5, 2014**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, **this 31 st**  **day of August, 2015, the Order of the Court of Commo n** 

**Pleas is hereby** AFFIRMED **. See Commonwealth v. Hopkins, 117 A.3d 247 (Pa. 20 15).**
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is 

not citable as precedent. It is a public record. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

05-3322 

KEVIN M. HOFFMANN, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, 

Respondent. 

 __________________________ 

 DECIDED: February 9, 2006 

 __________________________ 

Before MAYER, SCHALL, and PROST, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

 Kevin M. Hoffman appeals the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board, denying his petition for review of the board’s initial decision affirming his removal 

from government service by the Department of the Navy. Hoffman v. Dep’t of the Navy, 

SE0752040073-I-1 (MSPB June 9, 2005). We affirm. 

 We must affirm the board’s decision unless it was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse 

of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; obtained without procedures 

required by law, rule or regulation having been followed; or unsupported by substantial 

evidence. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (2000). In 1999, the department instituted a general 
policy not to extend tours abroad beyond five years, and Hoffman had spent nine years

in Japan at the time the department decided not to grant him a fifth two-year tour 

extension. Accordingly, the board properly found that the refusal to grant the extension 

was not an abuse of managerial discretion. Because Hoffman was offered and refused 

a position under the department’s Priority Placement Program, the board properly found 

that his removal promoted the efficiency of the service. See 5 U.S.C. §§ 7513(a), 

7701(c)(1)(B); Hayes v. Dep’t of the Navy, 727 F.2d 1535, 1539 (Fed. Cir. 1984). 

Finally, the board correctly found that Hoffman did not establish either harmful 

procedural error, see 5 U.S.C. § 7701(c)(2)(A), or reprisal, see id. § 7701(c)(2)(B), in the 

removal decision. 

05-3322 2
# C_2010358EN.01002201.xml

| 31.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/22

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 December 2010

2010/C 358/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3280 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 108,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4544 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86020 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0133 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2475 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8190 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,240 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 279,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7098 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9650 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2873 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0636 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3079 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3275 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3350 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7207 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7132 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 504,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,8030 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7659 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3855 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 933,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0900 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,108 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,5432 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,046 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2182 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4473 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,6500 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3280

JPY

Japanese yen

108,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4544

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86020

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0133

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2475

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8190

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,240

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

279,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7098

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9650

RON

Romanian leu

4,2873

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0636

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3079

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3275

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3350

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7207

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7132

KRW

South Korean won

1 504,06

ZAR

South African rand

8,8030

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7659

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3855

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 933,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0900

PHP

Philippine peso

58,108

RUB

Russian rouble

40,5432

THB

Thai baht

40,046

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2182

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4473

INR

Indian rupee

59,6500

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WELLS FARGO BANK NA, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00127-MP-GRJ

BBMJ, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on doc. 44, Stipulated Motion for Extension of

Deadline by plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and defendants BBMJ, LLC; Keith

Brooking; Christopher G. Mohr; and Douglas Johnson, Jr.1 Defendants have until

February 24, 2012 to file answers to plaintiff’s complaint. Moreover, the plaintiff’s

motion to amend its complaint and defendant Brooking’s motion to dismiss are pending

before the Court. As such, the parties request the deadline to file disclosures pursuant

to Rule 26(a) be extended to February 24, 2012.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The parties’ stipulated motion for extension of deadline, doc. 44, is

GRANTED.

1

 Defendant William Brooks did not participate in either of the parties’ planning

meetings held on January 9, 2012 or February 9, 2012 and is not a party to the instant

motion.

Case 1:11-cv-00127-MP-GRJ Document 46 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The parties shall file their disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a) on or before

February 24, 2012.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of February, 2012. 

áBZtÜç eA ]ÉÇxá 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:11-cv-00127-MP-GRJ

Case 1:11-cv-00127-MP-GRJ Document 46 Filed 02/13/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOHN BAILEY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv304-SPM/WCS

EDWIN BUSS, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Magistrate Judge’s Order,

Report and Recommendation dated June 21, 2011. Doc. 32. Plaintiff has been

furnished a copy and has filed objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). Doc. 33. Despite the objections, I have determined

that the report and recommendation is correct and should be adopted. 

In his objections, Plaintiff argues that instead of dismissing his § 1983

complaint, the Court should treat it as a habeas petition challenging the

disciplinary action. Plaintiff’s complaint, however, is not on the habeas form and

lacks sufficient detail to establish that he raised his federal claims in state court

so as to exhaust his remedies, or that he has cause and prejudice to overcome a

Case 4:11-cv-00304-SPM-WCS Document 7 Filed 07/14/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

procedural default. If Plaintiff wishes to file a habeas petition, he has the

opportunity to do so on the proper form since the dismissal here is without

prejudice. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Order, Report and Recommendation (doc. 

5) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is denied

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. This case is dismissed without prejudice.

4. The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket that the dismissal is

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of July, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:11cv304-SPMWCS

Case 4:11-cv-00304-SPM-WCS Document 7 Filed 07/14/11 Page 2 of 2
<Page>

                                                    Exhibit 8.1
                                               LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<Table>
<S>                                                     <C>
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
                   SUBSIDIARY NAME                                 JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Ltd                                     South Africa
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Ltd                                               South Africa
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
West Witwatersrand Gold Mines Ltd                                           South Africa
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd                                      South Africa
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
Dome Resources (Pty) Ltd                                                     Australia
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
Dome Resources (PNG) Ltd                                                  Papua New Guinea
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
Tolukuma Gold Mines Ltd                                                   Papua New Guinea
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
</Table>
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-2205

___________________________

Brock Fredin

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Halberg Criminal Defense; Christina Zauhar

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Minnesota

 ____________

 Submitted: December 21, 2020

Filed: December 28, 2020 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, WOLLMAN, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Brock Fredin appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his diversity legal

malpractice action. Having reviewed the record and considered the parties’

1The Honorable Susan Richard Nelson, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.
arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Kelly v. City of Omaha, 813

F.3d 1070, 1075 (8th Cir. 2016) (grant of motion to dismiss for failure to state claim

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) is reviewed de novo); Kozlov v. Associated Wholesale

Grocers, Inc., 818 F.3d 380, 394 (8th Cir. 2016) (denial of motion to amend

complaint is reviewed for abuse of discretion); Flores v. United States, 689 F.3d 894,

900 (8th Cir. 2012) (reviewing district court’s interpretation of Minnesota malpractice

statute de novo, and denial of motion to extend time limits set forth in Minnesota

expert review statute for abuse of discretion); In re Charter Commc’ns, Inc., 443 F.3d

987, 993 (8th Cir. 2006) (denial of motion for reconsideration is reviewed for abuse

of discretion). The motion for reimbursement of the appellate filing fee is denied. 

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

-2-
<PAGE>   1

                                KYLE TINGLE, CPA
                                 P.O. Box 50141
                             Henderson, Nevada 89016
                                 (702) 434-8452
                               (702) 436-4218 fax



To Whom It May Concern:                                March 28, 2001


The firm of Kyle Tingle, Certified Public Accountant consents to the inclusion
of his report of March 8, 2001, on the Financial Statements of Hawksdale
Financial Visions, Inc., as at December 31, 2000, in any filings that are
necessary now or in the future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,




Kyle Tingle
Certified Public Accountant
# C_2010213EN.01001901.xml

| 6.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/19

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 August 2010

2010/C 213/10

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3184 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4513 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3823 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3820 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8765 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,750 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 279,68 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7083 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9831 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2538 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9791 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4429 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3358 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2360 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8149 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7829 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 537,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5316 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,9281 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2260 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 776,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1628 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,361 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,3010 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,314 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3091 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4735 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,8970 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3184

JPY

Japanese yen

113,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4513

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82930

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3823

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3820

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8765

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,750

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

279,68

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7083

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9831

RON

Romanian leu

4,2538

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9791

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4429

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3358

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2360

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8149

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7829

KRW

South Korean won

1 537,94

ZAR

South African rand

9,5316

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,9281

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2260

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 776,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1628

PHP

Philippine peso

59,361

RUB

Russian rouble

39,3010

THB

Thai baht

42,314

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3091

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4735

INR

Indian rupee

60,8970

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---