1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DARRYLL JOEL McKENZIE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

WALTER McNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:11-cv-45-RH-WCS

PLAINTIFF’S TIME-SENSITIVE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through the undersigned attorney, and 

moves this Court to Reconsider its Order that Plaintiff Disclose Work Product to 

Defendants and would further show:

1. An Order to Produce Work Product based on Waiver is a harsh remedy.

2. As a pro se litigant, Mr. McKenzie was his own representative within the 

meaning of Rule 26, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, such that his 

thoughts and impressions were protected by work product privilege.

3. Plaintiff’s act in sending records, which included thoughts and impressions, 

home to be stored and provided to an attorney, when retained, did not 

constitute a waiver of the work product privilege in itself.

4. Plaintiff’s redaction of handwritten annotations of thoughts and 

impressions on documents produced to Defendants under Court Order was 

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 28
2

not willful disobedience to the Court Order but based on an impression that 

such annotations were analogous to the kind of redactions typically made by 

state actors on documents turned over in discovery.

5. Law enforcement agencies and defendants typically redact not only home 

addresses, dates of birth, and Social Security Numbers but also, often, 

names and addresses of potential witnesses and potentially embarrassing but 

discoverable information. See Exhibit A, Defendant Moore’s Personnel 

Records Provided by Defendants.

1

6. Plaintiff’s redaction of the materials was not willful disregard of the Court’s 

Order but rather a misunderstanding of what was meant by production, 

relying on the language of Rule 26(b)(3)(B), Federal Rules of Civil 

Procedure, that reads: “If the court orders discovery of [trial preparation]

materials, it must protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, 

conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of a party's attorney or other 

representative concerning the litigation.”

7. Defendants have not proven, as required, that they “have a substantial need 

for the materials to prepare their case and cannot, without undue hardship, 

obtain their substantial equivalent by other means” as required by Rule

26(b)(3)(A)(ii) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

 

1

It is not contended that Defendants made these redactions because they are the same as in the 

materials received directly from the Department of Corrections, but Defendants were entitled to an 

unredacted copy of their own personnel records and did not trouble to secure them.

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 2 of 28
3

8. Defendants remained silent regarding the redactions for nearly three 

months, bringing it up only when Plaintiff complained about their failure to 

provide Defendants’ arrest information and financial information relevant 

to punitive damages.

MEMORANDUM OF LAW

The first issue is whether a Plaintiff who has a duty to provide records to 

Defendants has a duty to provide annotations of thoughts and impressions by the 

Plaintiff and whether the duty to produce implies the burden to justify the redaction 

of those thoughts and impressions. The second issue is whether, if the duty and the 

burden are on the Plaintiff in such a case, whether the sanction of forced disclosure of 

the thoughts and impressions is an excessively harsh or extreme sanction.

The Northern District of Georgia has held that a plaintiff who creates workproduct material before hiring an attorney is still permitted to take advantage of the 

work-product doctrine. Moore v. Tri–City Hospital Authority, 118 F.R.D. 646, 649–50 

(N.D.Ga.1988) (Hall, J.) We submit that, in effect, Mr. McKenzie, pro se, was his own 

representative for purposes of Rule 26, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, when he 

wrote the thoughts and impressions redacted from the documents produced.

The burden to justify the production of work product is on the party seeking it, 

not the party from which it is sought. As the Supreme Court said in Hickman:

But the general policy against invading the privacy of an attorney's course of 

preparation is so well recognized and so essential to an orderly working of our 

system of legal procedure that a burden rests on the one who would invade that 

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 3 of 28
4

privacy to establish adequate reasons to justify production through a subpoena 

or court order.

Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 512, 67 S. Ct. 385, 394, 91 L. Ed. 451 (1947)

Work product can be divided into two types: “fact” work product and “core” 

work product. Core or opinion work-product encompasses the “mental impressions, 

conclusions, opinion or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a party 

concerning the litigation,” and is “generally afford near absolute protection from 

discovery.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(3), In re Cendant Corp. Securities Litigation, 343 F.3d 658,

664 (3rd Cir. 2003) (citing In re Ford Motor Co., 110 F.3d 954, 962 n. 7 (3d Cir.1997)). In 

re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litig., 258 F.R.D. 280, 293 (D. Del. 2008).

Opinion work product is substantially different than fact work product. As the 

Eastern District of Pennsylvania held:

First, in concluding that Martin Marietta had waived the work product doctrine 

as to the specific materials quoted in its submissions to the government and all 

materials “on the same subject matter as that disclosed,” the Fourth Circuit 

stated that “subject matter waiver ... should not extend to opinion work 

product.” Martin Marietta, 856 F.2d at 625-26; see also Informatica Corp. v. 

Business Objects Data Integration, Inc., 454 F.Supp.2d 957, 963, 2006 WL 

2038461, at *6 (N.D.Cal.2006) (citing In re EchoStar Communications Corp., 

448 F.3d 1294, 1302 (Fed.Cir. May 1, 2006) (“work-product waiver only extends to 

‘factual’ or ‘non-opinion’ work product”)). As explained above, Householder's 

recollection constitutes opinion work product or commingled fact and opinion 

work product and, therefore, any work product protection waived by the 

disclosure of the White paper cannot extend to the information plaintiffs seek.

In re Linerboard Antitrust Litig., 237 F.R.D. 373, 389 (E.D. Pa. 2006)(emphasis added).

Forced disclosure of opinion work product as a sanction is a harsh remedy. 

The “strong public policy” underlying the work-product doctrine has been 

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 4 of 28
5

substantially incorporated in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3). Upjohn C. v. 

U.S., 499 U.S. 383, 101 S.Ct. 677, (1981).

Forced disclosure of privileged documents “is a serious sanction, but one that 

may be imposed only if the ... Court finds bad faith, wilfulness, or fault.” In re Teleglobe

Communications Corp., 493 F.3d 345, 386 (3d Cir. 2007) (dealing with attorney-client 

privilege, citing Am. Nat’l Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc’y of 

the U.S., 406 F.3d 867, 877 (7th Cir.2005)). See also Langley v. Union Elec. Co., 107 F.3d 

510, 514 (7th Cir.1997) (“[Discovery] sanctions may only be imposed where a party 

displays wilfulness, bad faith, or fault.’ ”) (citation omitted).

Plaintiff’s redaction of the materials was not willful disregard of the Court’s 

Order but rather a misunderstanding of what was meant by production, relying on the 

language of Rule 26(b)(3)(B), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that reads: “If the 

court orders discovery of [trial preparation] materials, it must protect against 

disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of a 

party's attorney or other representative concerning the litigation.”

Defendants have not proven, as required, that they “have a substantial need for 

the materials to prepare their case and cannot, without undue hardship, obtain their 

substantial equivalent by other means” as required by Rule 26(b)(3)(A)(ii) Federal 

Rules of Civil Procedure.

Ordering Plaintiff to produce for the Defendants, who have never shown need, 

the thoughts or impressions of a pro se litigant, unprotected by a lawyer’s guile, 

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 5 of 28
6

afterward conveyed to this attorney, has the potential to do harm to Plaintiff’s case 

and the Order to do so should be vacated.2

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Moves this Honorable Court to Vacate its Order 

Requiring Production of Documents with Plaintiff’s Annotations of Thoughts and 

Impressions, which was ordered as due at the end of this business day.

Respectfully Submitted,

s/James V. Cook______________________

JAMES V. COOK, ESQ.

Florida Bar Number 0966843

Law Office of James Cook

314 West Jefferson Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(850) 222-8080; 561-0836 fax

cookjv@nettally.com

I CERTIFY that I have consulted with counsel for the Defendants, pursuant to Local 

Rule 7.1 and counsel for the Defendants does object to this Motion.

I CERTIFY the foregoing was filed electronically on 3/1/12 and that the person 

noted below is registered to be notified by the CM/ECF electronic mail system:

Lance Eric Neff and Mark Hiers

Office of the Attorney General

The Capitol, PL 01

Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050

Lance.neff@myfloridalegal.com

Ginger Barry Boyd

Broad and Cassel

200 Grand Boulevard, Suite 205A

Destin, Florida 32550

gbarry@broadandcassell.com

s/James Cook____________________

JAMES V. COOK

 

2 Plaintiff has previously filed the unredacted copies of the documents with the Court under seal.

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 6 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000606

SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: 

DAm'OF 

- ••• • .. • '._ ••• ~._: _ •• .• • .••• ' .~~.. e 

st.a.tC ofllloIida 

Department of CotrectiOllS 

. USE OF FORCE LOG 

INcIDENf BRIEF DESCRIPTION OUTCOME .' .. ' . '.REVIEWED BY -: , . 

11-2-0-07 

J j. U 

\ I D . 

!f-IIo-iJ8'" t . . !·,~l ,: dfr· ( o ' .. 4# 

)C2-802. (Revised 9-99)) 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 1

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 7 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000607

,06/10/2005 09:48 WARDENS OFFICE ~ 

STATE OF FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

COUNSELING MEMORANDUM 

(Not a disciplinary action) 

Date: June 6, 2005 

Employee: William Moore Class Title: Correctional Officer 

Department: Security Work Location: Columbia C.L 

PAGE 03 

REASON FOR COUNSELING; A review of your attendance and leave record revcaled~ 

that between October 2004 and April 2005, you've had six (6) tardies and three (3) 

un.scheduled absences resulting from· ~alI-ins The specific dates for the absences 

werel0/26/04, 11/27104, and 12/04/04; and for the late arrivals were 12/07/04, 02/04/05, 

02/11105, 03106105, 03/10/05, 04/22/05. Although the absences may have been for 

legitimate reasons and were approved, Man.agement is a little more concero with your 

dependability to arrive at your post on time especially since you reside on state grounds. 

You have been previously spoken to about this to no avail. 

CORRECTIVE INSTRUCTION GIVEN EMPLOYEE: 

You are being encouraged to reduce the number of late arrivals unless extenuating 

circumstances prevail. It is expected that in the futur~ you will be more conscientious in 

following the rules, Tegulations, policies, and procedures regarding attendance and leave. 

Your attendance Tecords wUl be monitored on an ongoing basis. Future behavior of a 

similar nature may result in diSciplinary action. 

......... ".; . - ') tl ~ -, yo{ '" / ,.i/ II;; . ... ,; "\. .""..- / - Ivf:~( .,1 f.,Cr6~-e_·W{J) t .. K ,. • • • q ~ B. ~J;;zJl. Date William. Moore Date Witness SignaturefDate "!"''J?I 

Major Correctional Officer (J 

xc: Personn.el File 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 2

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 8 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000608

05/09/2005 12;00 3967547602 WARDENS OFFICE PAGE 03 

• DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

INCIDENT REPORT • 

REPORTING INSTITUTION: COLUMBIA C.T. INCIDENT REPORT 

NUMBER: 

200500522 

PREA NUMBER: 

REPORTING OFFICER: W.M. DOWLING, LT. DATE OF lNCIDENT: 4126/05 

PERSON(S) INVOLVED: W. MOORE, C.O. TIME OF INCIDENT: 10;05 A.M. 

WITNESS(ES): 

DETAILS OF INClI>ENT: AT APPROXIMATELY 10:115 A.M.,oN 4/26/05 WHIU: ASSIGNED AS ADMINISTRATIVE 

LIEUTENANT AT THE MAIN tJNTT, l WAS REVIEWING THE REPORTS OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCEILATE 

ARRIVALS, WHEN I NOTICED THAT OFFICER WILLIAM MOORE, ASSIGNED TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE 

SHIFT lN FOOD SERVICE, HAD A TOTAL OF I'll NE UNSCHEDULED ABSENCES IN A SIX MONTHS PERIOD 

BETWEEN 10/26104 AND 4fl2lO5. OFFICR:R MOORE CALLED IN TIlREE TIMES AND WAS LATE FOR WORK 

SIX TIMES. OFFICER MOORE CALLED IN , . ON 10126/04, 11127104, AND 1214/04. OFFICER MOORE WAS 

LA TJj; FOR WORK 1217104, 2/4105,:z1t 1/tl5, 3/6105, 3/10/05 AND 4122/1)5, I HAVE SPOKEN TO OFFICER MOORE ABOUT 

THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING AT WORK ON TIME AS INDICATED ON THE ATTACHED UNSCHEDULED 

ABSENCE FORMS, BUT TO NO AVAIL. 

4127105 

DATE 

SHIFT 0.1.e. 

COMMENT: OFFICER MOORES' NINE UNSCHEDULED ABSENCEILATE ARRIVALS IN THE LAST SIX 

MONTHS IS CLEARLY SUBSTANDARD. OFFICER MOORE LIVES ON STATE PROPERTY IN THE TRAILER PARK 2 AND liAS BEEN LATE FOR WORK SIX TIMES IN A LmLE OVER FOUR MONTAS. FORWARDED FOR 

APPROPRIATJj; ACTION. 

4127/05 

DATE 

, I ' 

CORR~ A FFJCERCHIEF 

DC6-210 (Revised 4/05) Page 1 of2 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 3

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 9 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000609

135/139/21305 12: 00 38575412 WARDENS OFFICE. 

STATE OF FLORIDA ' 

PAGE 12 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

REPORT OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE /LATE ARRIVAL 

IMPORTANT: PLEASE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SlOE PRIOR TO COMPLETING 

FORM. PLEASE DO NOT LIST ANY MEDICAL INFORMA nON ON THIS FORM. 

EMPLOVEE NAME: W. MOORE 

----~----------------~~~~~~----.--------- CLASS TITLE: . CORRECTIONAL OFFICER smFT ASSIGNMENT: ADMIN 

PART I:. NOTIFICA TION OF UNSCH.EDULED ABSENCE: 

(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE EMPLOYEE'S T MMEDIATE SUPERVISOR, THE SHIFT Ole ON DUTY, 

OR THE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED TO RECErvE REPORTS OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE) 

Employee is Ca11ing To Report: ABSENCE ~LATE ARRIVAL 

Time of Call: 6:15AM Date: April 22, 2005 ----~~--------------------

Name and Title of Employee Receiving Call -21t~---- _______ _ 

PART II: REVIEW BY EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUP.ERVISOR 

Employee Was: ABSENT OLA T8: ARRIVAL DABSENT WIO NOTICE 

Time of Late Anival: 

Employee's Regular Day, Off il1 su rEf MDT 0 W" 0 T~ F 0 SA 

Was Employee Contacted on Date of Absence? DYES NO 

If Yes. Instructions Given: 

Status' of Leave: 0 APPROVED rz( DISAPPROVED 

Type of Leave "L fI.ii Reason for Leave: 2'1.1~,; "" 

co~:~ i!!t • ,;$ ~~ .~--~ _-.:::::.:.sc.::::::::::';~~~;?';~~I.':'::erYl~so:::.r~ 1tle Date _. 

PART III: 

Af.t?"*:~ Title Date: 

--------~-----------------------------

DC2-836 (J 0/03) 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 4

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 10 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000610

05/09/2005 12:00 WARDENS OFFICE4IIt 

STATE OF FLORIDA 

DEPARTM,ENT OF CORRECT.lONS 

RE.PDRT OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENC:E ILATE ARRIVAL 

PAGE 11 

IMPORTANT: PLEASE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDB PRIOR TO COMPLETfNG 

FORM. PLEASE DO NOT LIST ANY MEDICAL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM. 

EMPLOYEE NAME: W.C. M.OORE 

CLASS TrrL.E: .:-:::::--~---"'~--

OFFICER SHIFT ASSIGNMENT.: ADMIN. 

PART I: NOTIFICATION OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE: 

(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR, THE SHIFT SUPERVISOR, 

OR THE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE REPORTS OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE) 

Employee is Calling To Report: DABSENCE [glLATE ARRIVAL 

Time of Call: NO CALL Date: MARCH 10j 2005 

". - .-- ... _---_._--------

Name and Title of Employee Receiving Call CAPTAIN'. R. ELLZEY ~. . .. .£--__ 

COMMENTS; OFFICER FAILED TO REPORT FOR DUTY. OFFICER WAS CALLED AT 4:05AM 

AND THERE WAS NO ANSWER. OFFICER FTNALL Y ARRIVED AT 4:57AM. . --------- ----------

PART Ii: REVIEW BV EMPLOYEE'S IMMElHATE SUPERVISOR 

Employee Was: DABSENT L8JLATE ARRIVAL OABSENT W/O NOTICE 

Time of Late Arrival: 

Employee's Regular Days Off D SU 0 MDT D w'O TH D F 0 SA 

Was Employee Contacted on Date of Absence'! DYES tlf~o"'---------

If Yes, Instructions Given: 

Status of Leave; 0 APPROVED o DISAPPROVED 

Typc of Leave __________ Reason for Leave: ~ ______ _ 

PART 11.1: 

~;;<:--_ENT BEAD .d 

Title ~~~~ ~--Date 

DC2·836 (Revised 7/04) 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 5

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 11 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000611

05/09/2005 12:00 WARDENS OFFICE. 

STATE OF FLORI.DA 

.DEPARTMENT OF Co.RRECT.IONS 

REPORT OJ .. " UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE /LATE ARRIVAL 

PAGE 10 

IMPORTANT: PLEASE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE PRIOR TO COMPLETING 

FORM. PLEASE DO NOT LIST ANY MEDICAL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM. 

EMPLOYEE NAME: }t. MOORE t tJ --------~~---------------------~----- CLASS TITLE~ OFFICER SHIFT ASSIGNMENT: FIRST· 

PART I: NOTIFICATION OF UNSCHRDULED ABSENCE: 

(TO BE COMPLETED BY 'tHE EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR, THE SHIFT OIC ON DUTY, 

OR THE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE REPORTS OF UNSCH.EDULED ABSENCE) 

Employee is Calling To RepOlt: DABSENCE lZJLATE ARRIVAL 

Time of Call: 11 :55PM . Date: 03-06-2005l!i-' 

Name and Tit1; of Employee Recelving Call R. ELLZE:, co CAPTAIN :e: 

COMMENTS: LA1'E ARIUVALAPPROX.TMATELY 15 MINS. --------------.. ----

PART II; REVIEW BY .EMPLOYEE'S IMME.DIATE SUPERVISOR 

Employee Was: DABSENT OLA TE ARRIVAL DABSENT WIO NOTICE 

Time of Late Arrival: 

Bmployee's Regular Days Off 0 SU 0 MDT 0 W'O TH D F 0 SA 

Was Employee Contacted on Date of Absence? DYES ONO 

If Yes, Instructions Given: 

Status of Leave: 0 APPROVED D DISAPPROVED 

Type of Leave ~ , Reason for Leave: L-;;i-p:--

.-----------------

COMMENTS: {;/Io r-t.C.1 Pz.,;"tA .. J~ ____________ _ 

___ . Titl_e ___ ._ 

PART III: REVIEW BY DEPARTMENT HEAD -;1/1£ /~-.. Sigiiat'ure of 

COMMENTS: 

DC2-836 (10/03) 

1 nt'') 

~).' .• _ .. '1 7-- () \~ 

---_. __ '-'I' . __ '-.- Date 

3·· ")''''~<} ~,~ DateEXHIBIT A, PAGE 6

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 12 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000612

05/09/2005 12:130 WARDENS OFFICE .' 

STATE OF FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

REPORT OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE ILATE ARRIVAL 

PAGE 139 

IMPORTANT: PLEASE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE PRIOR TO COMPLETING 

FORM. PLEASE DO NOT LIST ANY MEDICAL INFORMATION ON THIS FQRM. 

EMPLOYEE NAME: W. MOORE 

---------------------=~--~~~----- CLASS TITLE: OmCER . SHIFf ASSIGNMENT: ADMIN 

PART I: NOTIFICATION OF UNSCHEDUL.ED ABSENCE: 

(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUPERvrSOR, THE SHIFT orc ON DUTY, 

OR THE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE REPORTS OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE) 

Employee is Calling To Report: DABsENCE 0LATE ARRIVAL 

Time of Call: 04:00AM Date: FEBRUARY 11, 2005 

Name and 'title of Eroployee Receiving Call CAPTAIN Joe. STEP-H-EN-S -?-, -~,.,"jJ~---': ::---. -------

COMMENTS: WILL BE ARRIVING LATE, (ARRIVED AT 4:25 AM). II 

PART II: REVIEW BY EMPLOYEE'S I.MMEDI.ATE SUPERVISOR 

Employee Was: ~ABSENT [E(LATE ARRIVAL DABSENTW/O NOTICE 

Time of Late Arrival: 

Employee's Regular Days Off 0 SU D MDT 0 Wd '0 TH OJ D SA 

Was Employee Contacted on Date of Absence? DYES·' @O 

If Yes, Instructions Given: 

Status of Leave: 0 APPROVED o DISAPPROVED 

Type of Leave Reason for Leave: 

PART III: TMENTHEAD 

Title 

DC2-836 (l 0/03) 

-i?-/5-tl5"" 

Date 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 7

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 13 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000613

05/09/2005 12:00 WARDENS OFFICE~ 

STATE OF FLORIDA 

DEPART.MENT OF CORRECTIONS 

PAGE 08 

REPORT OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE !LATE ARRIVAL 

IMPORTANT~ PLEASE REVt.EW INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE PRIOR TO COMPLBTTNG 

FORM. PLEASE DO NOT LTST ANY MEDICAL .1.NFORMATION ON THIS FORM. 

EMPLOYEE NAME: . W. MOORE 

CLASS TITLE: CORRECT-'-O-N-A-L OFFICER SHIFT ASSIGNMENT: ADMIN 

---.--.. -

PART 1: NOTIFICATION OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE: 

(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR, THE SHIFT Ole ON DUTY, 

OR THE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE REPORTS OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE) 

o Employee is CalTing To Report: ABSENCE XXLA TE ARRIVAL 

Time of Call: Date: FEBRUARY 4, 20~ 

Name and Title of Employee Receiving Call CAPTAIN J. STEP! fENS 

COMMENTS: DID NOT CALL 

/PL .. ,_· .'. -"-, _. 

PART II: REVIEW BY EMPLOYEE '8 IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR 

Employee Wa.r;;: ABSBNT ~LATE ARRIVAL DABSENT WIO NOTICE 

Time of Late Arrival: 4:35AM ----~=---~-------' -------------- DsuDM DT Ow OTHOF DSA 

Was Employee Contacted on Date of Absence? DYES DNO 

If Yes, Instructions Given: 

Status of Leave: 0 APPROVED [E('DISAPPROVED 

Type of Leave Reason. for Leave: -----

COMMEN~~~ __ ~~ ________ M ______ ___ 

-----?Ii: -- _A"'z--4S_._ 

Date 

----_.------

EPARTMENT HEAD 

,. 

:J/£- Title 

2: "\7-z1~,_ Date 

DC2-836 (10/03) 

," 1 ",of? 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 8

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 14 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000614

05/09/2005 12:00 WARDENS OFFICE ~ 

STATE OF FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

PAGE 04 

,REPORT OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE fLATE ARR'.Y AL /' ,:,:>,'" 

IMPORTANT: PLEASE REVTEW INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE PRIOR TO COMPLETING 

FORM. Pl.EASE DO NOT LIST ANY MEDICAL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM. 

EMPLOYEE NAME: W. MOORE 

------------------------- CLASS TITLE: CORRRCl'lO!'iAL OfFICER SHIFT ASSlGNMENT: A.DMIN 

------- PART f: NOTlF'ICATION OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE: 

(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR, THE SHIFT Ole ON DUTY, 

OR THE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED TO RECEIV E REPORTS OF UNSCHEDU LED ABSENCE) 

Employee is Calling To Report: jg]ABSENCE OLA TE ARRTV AL 

Time ofeall: 03:30AM Date: 10/26104 

Name and Title of Employee Receiving Call R.L. ELLZ~Y, CAPT'-A-If"f$l..,:.:::;;r:~,,<::",-------

COMMENTS: 

PART U: REVIEW BY EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR 

Employee Was: iZIABSENT DLATE ARRIVAL DABSENT W/ONOTICE 

Time ()fLatc Anival: 

__ .. OSU qM Dr Ow. .,DTHDr DSA 

Was Employee Contacted on Date of Absence? DYES DNO 

If Yes, lnstructions Giveo/' 

Status of Leave: ~ API1ROVED 

Type of Leave ~:...&: ;;;;> 

o DISAPPROVED 

Reason for Leave: 

COMMENTS: ;!..;f&:~;.¥,,¥-. ~¥-..,4,.0~~~;.;L4-'" 4:t.2<=----) ______________ _ 

Si 

)ffi" Title ,< Date 

PART III: ,:it£ ,t 'I ." 

---. ", Title---

DC2-836 (10/03) 

1 /"'If? 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 9

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 15 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000615

05/09/2005 12:00 WARDENS OFFICE ~ 

STATE OF FLORIDA 

DEPARTM,ENT OF CORRECTIONS 

REPORT OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE ILATE ARRIVAL 

PAGE 05 

IMPORTANT! PLEASE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE PRIOR TO COMPLETING 

FORM. PLEASE DO NOT LIST ANY MEDICAL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM. 

EMPLOYEE l~AME: \III MOORE -----------------------------------"------'-----

CLASS TITLE: OFFICER, SIUFT ASSIGNMENT: ADMTN/FS 

-~-----

PART I: NOTJl?ICATION OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE: 

(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR, THE SHIFT ole ON DUTY, 

OR THE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE REPORTS OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE) 

Employee is Calling To Report; I25JABSENCE OLATE ARRiVAL 

Time ofean: 4:35AM Date: NOVEMBER 27) 2004 

Name and Title of Employee Receiving Call CAPTAIN J.C. "STEPJ-IE~S;t:2d---~--' 

COMMENTS: , / 

PART II: REVIEW BY EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR. 

Employee Was: ~ABSENT OLATE ARRIVAL DABSENT WID NOTICE 

Time of Late Arrival: 

Employee's Regular Days Orf [1?§u ItfM 0 TOW' 0 TH 0 F 0 SA 

Was Employee Contacted on Date of Absence? DYES - ~O 

If Yes, .Instructi.ons Given: 

Status of Leave: 0APPROVED 

Type of Leave ~ 

o DISAPPROVED 

Reason for Leave: 

PART III: ARTMENT EAD 

4 v ..... - ---- --~---- itle 

DC2-836 (l0/03) 

10f2 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 10

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 16 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000616

05/09/2005 12:00 , WARDENS OFFICE., 

STATE OF FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

REPORT OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE fLATE ARRIVAL 

PAGE 06 

IMPORTANT: PLEASE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE PRIOR TO COMPLETIN(~ 

FORM. PLEASE DO NOT LIST ANY MEDICAL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM. 

EMPLOYEE NAME: W. MOORE ---- CLASS TITLE: OFFICER SHIFf ASSIGNMENT: ADMIN 

PART I: NOTIFICA TION OF UNSCHEDULE.O ABSENCE: 

(TO BE COMPLET.ED BY THE EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUP.8RVISOR~ THE SHIFT ole ON DUTY, 

OR THE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED TO RECETVE REPORTS OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE) 

Employee is Calling To RepOlt: rgJABSENCE OLATE ARRIVAL 

Time of Call: 04:30AM Date: DECEMBER 4~ 2004 

Name and Title ofEm~Ioyec Receiving Call CAPTAIN J. C. STEP~H-E-N-S--;P~~--f-'-------- .. ~ 

COMMENTS: 

PART Il; REVIEW BY EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATESUPERVlSOR 

Employee Was: /3JABSENT DLATE ARRTVAL DABSENT WIO NOTICE 

Time of Late Arrival: 

Employee's Regular Days Off \1rsu tB"M 0 TOW "0 TH D F 0 SA ---" 

Was Employee Contacted on Date of Absence? DYES DNO 

o DISAPPROVED 

Reason for Leave: 

l>EPARTMENT HEAD 

~------

-.~~~. Title 

I nf? 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 11

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 17 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000617

05/09/2005 12:00 WARDENS OFFICE .) 

STATE OF .FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

PAGE 07 

REPORT OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE !LATE ARRIVAL 

IMPORTANT: PLEASE REVIEW INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDe; PRIOR TO COMPLETING 

FORM. PLEASE DO NOT LIST ANY MEDICAL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM. 

EMPIJOYEE NAME: W. Moore 

------------.------~----------- CLASS TITLE: C.O . . SHIFT ASSIGNMENT: Admin .---'--~-- ----

PARTJ; NOTUi'ICATTON OF UNSCHEDULED ABSENCE: 

(TO BE COMPLETED BY THE EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR, THE SHlFT SUPERVISOR, 

OR THE EMPLOYEE DESIGNATED TO RECEIVE REPORTS OF UNSCHEDU LED ABSENCE) 

Employee is Calling To Report: OABSENCE [8jLA TE ARRIVAL 

Time of Call: 4:15 AM Date: December 7,2004 ----=------------~----.-.--~-

Name a.nd Title of Employee Receiving Call Captain G. M. Bran1ien 

COMMENTS: Sergeant B. Reddick Called Officer W. Moore at 4: 15am. Oflicer W. Moore Reported for . - Duty at 4:30AM 

PART II: REVIEW.BY EMPLOYEE'S IMMEDIATE SUPERVISOR 

Employee Was: DAl)SENT iZTEARRIVAL DABSENTW/ONOTICE 

Time of Late Arrival: 

Employee's Regular Days Off ---0Su' lZl MDT 0 W 0 TH CJ F 0 SA 

Was Employee Contacted on Date of Absence? DYES" !8No--

If Yes, Instructions Given: 

Status ()f Leave: 0 APPROVED 

PART III: 

-~~ SIgnature o· 

COMMENTS: 

DC2·836 (Revised 7/04) 

~ISAPPROVED Reason for Leave: 

EAD 

------~----

~dI-- --~-

Date .. ----

Datc 

------,~-... --... --

I "f'l 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 12

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 18 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000618

·' • 

STATE OF FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

WRITTEN REPRIMAND 

Date: April 6, 2004 

To: William C. Moore --------~==~====~-------- Class Title: Correctional Officer 

Employee Name 

Department: Security Work Location: Columbia CI 

Length of Service,: 8 months 

written Reprimand # 1 Conduct Unbecoming a Public Employee 

On or about August 23, 2003 you were arrested by the Columbia County Sheriffs Office 

for Disorderly Intoxication and Resisting an Officer without Violence. On October 16, 

2003 you appeared in Columbia County Court and entered a plea of Nolo Contendere to 

the charge of Disorderly conduct and was adjudicated guilty. You were sentenced to one 

day in the county jail with credit for time served and fined $50.00. 

Your conduct violated DMS Ru1e 60L-36.005 (3)(f), C}lapter 33-208.002 (4)(a) and 33-

208.003 (22), Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). 

Actions of this nature cannot and will not be tolerated. Future violations of this nature 

may result in further and possibly more severe disciplinary action. ' 

Kepnmanding Authority;s Signature 

o/lJIdff ·&ihlb l.~ ~ 4 ... ~-o'{ Date Employee's Signature Date 

cc: Personnel File 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 13

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 19 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000619

~lorida Department .;~ CO]Tectim~ Office ofllie Inspector General 

Investigative Report - Short Form Addendum 

Classification of Incident: Employee Arrest. 

Class Code: 260 

Incident Date: 08/22/2003 Time: 0007 hours 

Assigned Date: 08/26/20039 

Report Date: 10/27/2003 

Dept. of Corrections . 

ect: 

Trainee 

Page 10f2 

: ", 

• ~ < .~ ... ~ •• ,.,~ _. '"?~ 

Case Number: 

Field Office: Gainesville 

Facility: 20l-Columbia 

Inspector: ~ 

Original Case Type: C 

Down!!r3lde to: 

1978 

.'.:t: 

FEB 192004 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 14

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 20 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000620

~lorida Department Of Correcti'--:- ,,' 

Office 'of the Inspector General 

Investigative Report - Short F onn Addendum 

Arrest: [gJ Employee D Inmate D Other 

Ch'arges: F.S.S. 856.011, Disorderly Conduct, 

D Guilty Addendum Pending 

D Not Guilty 

~ Nolo Contendere 

D Felony ~ Misdemean:or o P.T.I. , 

, Date of Arrest: 08/22/2003 ~ Other (explanation): Adjudicated Guilty 

Date Reported: 10116/2003 

Sentence of Court 1 Agreement: One day Courity Jail with credit for time served, $50.00 fine 

Administrative Violation(s): F.A.C 33-208.002 (4)(a) Conduct Unbecoming 

Classification: ' D Not Sustained o Exonerated ~ Sustained 

Case Summary Continu~d: r 

On August 23,2003 Columbia COlUlty Sheriffs Deputy 

Moore. According to Columbia County Sh~riffs Office report : 

following: 

arrested Correctional Officer William 

_, _leputy , 1 indicated the 

Upon his arrival he found Officer Moore being held by a Rumor's Bar employee. When confronted by Deputy 

and told to identify himself, Officer Moore stated, "I ain't telling you shit." Officer Moore began to 

yell and "cussll at the deputy, causing a small crowd to gather. As Deputy - Ilttempted to handcuff 

Officer Moore he pulled away twice, before being taken into custody. 

~-' 

On October 16, 2003 Correctional Officer William Moore appeared in Columbia County Court in reference to , ' 

case number: .. Officer Moore pled Nolo Contendre to the charge of Disorderly Conduct and 

was adjudicated guilty. He received one day in the county jail with creditfor time served and fmed $50.00. 

Incident Class: Employee Arrest 

Evidence: D Weapon D Drugs 

Other. Agency Case Number: Columbia 

CountySheriffs Officer 

UCR Classification: 

Facility: ' 20 I-Columbia CI , Case Number: 

o Other Describe: 

Number of Attachme.nts: Three (3) 

D CBA D Cleared by Exception Open Pending 

10/27/2003 Date 

~~:::t-~~~:Z::::L-,f-_...:~.:.4-= Inspector Supervisor .,..llt ,Ai Date 

~~~Date 

~, Page 2 of2 

, .'; .. 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 15

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 21 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000621

Date of Birth: ___ --'-__ 

The Defendant, 

...... : . 

. ; 

rt'~*". 

,: '~th credit fort~~~~~dOf.;...."--:.;.--==;;- . -, .; ""~,:. .'" :\. '-,-~, 

." 1": 

.' '. The iricarcerationh;.ay·be serv~.iD. consecutive;eekiy'ui~llmentS 'or 48 bours from --. .' '. .... . -,",. ". ,·.:··:·· ... '1·.;·· ....... ----

______ on ________ ~~~--~ __ ~-~ 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 16

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 22 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000622

. '~():;:::~'_·~:(:1~~ 

,.'.~~:'1:~r:~~!;tfP:~r:~=r~:f~7"": '.' ... ''.' ':':,{ 

WAINWRIGHT JUDICIAL' SERVICES .. ~ 

, ::\·:".:~~-.i~>:·::" ," '~:::;~-J-' -- ,,~~:·t: ' .. :~:t;;':; :~:,; ;·'7<ti~r:;:'<¥i 

The Court pl~ces~ougll ____ s~p~~~.~~, unsupervised Probation for::... •.... ."j 

~.'. ,. . . .(:'" _:. ~ .~""" ~. .~~r~";..·. '. " ,:~;r~.::~··.. " /- ,', -'~.;~ 

;-: '- ""i~~,': :,;' ": . : ::.' ... :.,::,:,.,.. . ...... ".' '.7. 

_______________ ·on.Count(s) 'a.iid prders that You.abide by the following :c;onditions of probation;'/ . ~" :,. .:'\.' _. . .. ~ .~~.. . '". . .. ;,?,I'~:.~,<:·". ". . .. ';.'"~" 

1. You willli.ve ~d remain'at li~e~ ;.vithou~5~iolating ~~·law. ~~~y~~~if~;in,~ c61rtiflaw shall not be n~~:~ar,Y)foithe' c::ourt .. ~/;5~ to find a vlOlatlOn of your probatl~n. , ",. .' " F . ~: ':,.:; . ,"~ ,. . ' ·;?';s.,t·;; ::j~ 

2. You will not use.intoxicants to excess, nor will X~>u'~i~it places.tlj~r.e into.xtf.(llltS, ,~~s()r o~er dangerous sup~~~es are '. 'i; 

unlawftllly sold, dispensed, or.ilsed:_':);;r~~·;;" i.~{~~o: ... : .. ~ :;' ':Tt::*~ "~:""'~~"" .;~f'." .'~; 3. You will work diiigently at a la",f4Ioccupation' ancJ,suppor(dep~qdeptStq'~e best of your ability or attend . . ;~ 

4. Y QU will ob~ey andfulfill .ail ,ad~itionaI obiigaiioris as:t!!~' Coulfl3f&is. "'.::"': ..•. ". . .. ' 

6. 

5. 

You 

You will 

will prompt~y 

not chtip.geyour 

jrnd truthfully 

residenCeoremploymenfwitho.ut 

anSwer all il1qriiriesdirectedt~:i91Iby firitprocUring the 

the 

court 

consent 

or the 

of 

probation 

your probation 

offiCer, 

offi 

arid: 

'; 

. tl1~officer!~~ to visit in Y9urhoine, empiOyrDent site or etse:.vhere; and you :Wille{)inply with all instructions helshe may giv:e yop:,:;:" '. . .. ;.;~ 

7. Once ~mb~th;'qnthedat~~i~ed by your probatioriofficer'f~ii11 make a full and tru.thfu1 report to your prob~ti~#'p,pc.er. 

.. 8. 

9. ~~~~;.tII:~~rC~;S.t~~fSUPervls1~nat a rate Of~40.00monthlY~/'!:{f . . ... /'~'::l~ 

Courts co~~;:··:,:, .. Fine(S):·~:r;,~~;·%;: .. ' , :,:. S~ch~tge: (5%): ~.~,'{::'f::' . ;,. . :' '(5<if~ ....,...-,--------'-----;-'- ---.,--.------,,..,.~:':_':::_'_-----_:_::c ..... ,. .';.-,i :.",.~ ,." . .".:2> 

Court Facility Fe~: . . ~ .• DUI surcharge:'-d~F,:: .. ' ":;'5:'~~~AlcOhOI Fee: _·:_':.::.:,·;-'i-'\-"-;-,-'-"'-_-:--__ ··-,-·;::~.·r:~ " ,-•. ".. ...... ,;:.. :'.: ~ :' .~ .... , ~.;.. . " 1«1'" 

DY,Fee:..:.· ;_______ PD Fee: ____ --'-__ s~6WJ~~ee: _____ · _. ___ FTACosts:_· :_;:.'_~~;:'_f.''''=!~(:_''y'_:"~_: _~_--:-----,'. ::':1 '.~'~ . .". ~ ::;;, ':;~' .. ::-:>' - " "':--:<,:'~f; 

Restitution in the amount Of$ "" ,to __ -:-:::~.,- =='----..,-------------'----:-_-=-"'---:of.--'-.. ...• ;t~ 

To~l of$ . _ ' .. ; :fCibepaid bY7~thii? in etpl/!l monthly payments Of$. __ ·...:.~;'..:;.:::,..,:·'~;,... :-:"'-:' _--:-_-.-:-:;~;;;.." j ~ Show PrQ'6.fofpaYlPents.made to the Clerk cifCourt bylwithlD.=-· ,;,.,' ::=-~'_';;'_-:' ...,..'_. _. _. -'-_-'--_-'--_~-_....:.:;;~:;.;,;....:~..".....-.-:~ 

'.::-<;",:>':: .•..... ~·/<·--~'···;~;~;:*:,;~;;L:L;~~~~· ... ," ~':'" 

Comniuruty Service may be _'_. _'" performed in lieu of fines ..•. ::>";P~~llt a rate of $ ____ per hour. 

- ,r':--·'" =- .', -~;:: ;~:.-~ .;.:~:.-; ... ".~~' 

. __ '._' No contact __ · No unlaw:fQ1 or harassing con~ctwith: __ ' _'. "_,,,~,;::,,-,:_. _-:-:-___________ ........,.,..,..;...=-_~=-.,......,=-...;..,,-

__ DO NOT-go within '. feet of victim '(s) residenc~o( ~liiployinent. .. /i->:;.> .. , . . .•.. ; ,7':-;;" :?~ . . __ SalvationArmy Work Program days, beginning ,~,.,.i;(: '; '," 

. : ". . , , " ,." ,:\~';:. . {ii~'%''i;~';~:~~~:'~;.c: ~: ,., __ . _ Coriun~ty $ervice Hours" __ ,... .e·A.buse;99unse1mg '.> 

.·within '. . .5·~<}(andorii 'sis~ ." . 

__ Shoplifting ~Course Enroll/Complete withiri ----:-\~._~r:J~.:~0'" ,',:;.' __ ' Stay out of: .. :~., ~.~.~-;;~ ... ;.~~~. ;;"'.~.<q~.~.;: :~".>: 

.. :'~:'~~r.~~'-'" 

__ Driver's License Suspended MonthslYearil 

Produce Valid. DL Within .~(~~IP..t~~:;~~~,~.r ;.: .• ·.~.~ .. ~.:.:.~.·.;.f.<.~ .. :f.:.,.'.:~ .•. ;,:.~ .. ".,onths O.f.,.b.:,e ...•. co .. ming ~~igible. /0f~~,~Y. __ Attend appropriate DUI School-EnroIH)Y!Wi~ . ..:;.4~~;;;i3!fl?:;:.;';';-...:.~~i..:..~:':'.:...:i -:-:-"-,-;' .::,:.; .~ . .:;;_ ,:.:.: . .:.,...,.,----,~...: • • :..-;.....:,--:..~-'-__ '--:i~:-:-,/;;",: ::.:::-.:,....;...~~...;..;.. _ 

__ Impoun e~iC!~.tO dar 11/.{(wa/i~(.nhi/l ~ ~O(\i:'" Or ~ 1~ hI ... !(}~. <Jr~.i,:j?::~}·.~: Other. ','[, l.t·-· .:,' J t., { Cl'-'\' Ii' 1 t_l.: U, ~. .-/V t- .... 

DONE AND ORDERED~ in Lake City, Columbia County, Florida on I(}-'! (0"'. ".ih~: 

Defendant 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 17

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 23 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000623

.' dOuR~REPORTER :: BAILIFF:: . _ ..... ______ . __ .. ___ ._._._. __ ._~ . .;. 

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 10/16/2003 ... ---":"'-~--~'-":'-' -..:.-:--..:....---...:.-.-~~-.' ~----~ ... ~~~.:~-.--: . ...;...:..----:...-..----.-.. -~;... ... -~-,,-~-~-----

MOORE'l WILLIAM CLATON 

DEFENDANT 

. .. 

STATE ATTOR.t£y 

... _ ....... v;-< L. ---.....:...,--_._ ..... _-----_...:..-----_. -- F~OBATION AND .PARDLE%f:1CER PUBLIC DEFENI}ER/COUNSEL 

eASE n 

C0UN1' 

C-001 

CHARGE 

DlSORDEr .. 1.S 'nnOXICATIOM 

OFFF:.h'BE 

STATUrE 

856011 

____ ... ___ ... _______ .... ____________ ,-. __ " ----.------.. ------------------.. --.. -t-o 

____ l\1AlVED COUNsEL :.... .... _ Transfer to Felony __ . _Ready for Tri.iill 

_'.:....-Public·~feodef-Appo~nted .. ·. '. .' ..:.--..; ~~y>Tri,a:L;~lVED . ___ Case:C'..ontl.oued/pas-serl'by= _~..:.~ __ . _ .... _____ . _'" _ .... REi-'turnDate:.....:_ .._~ ___ . _ 

Bt*YOU MUST APP£AR 'FOR ALL COURT ,DATES UNLESS 'EXCUSEl> BY THE.;rUOOE******** ~.:~.~: _Non Jury Pretria.l _______ .... __ NCiO Jury Trl.al ______ ~ ___ · ~ ____ . ___ _ 

;~'_Pretrial __ ,....,.:..-.- -03 1=50 PWPretri.al Status f'...onf M __ - _"'::"'-03 1:50 PM _~_._J~\ry Select ian = ____ .. ______ ~ __ Trial llates;·· ___ ~_..:....-____ _ ___ Civil Heaf-ing: __ . ___ ._-:-:_. _. ___________ : ___ . ______ ...;,.:;....:: ..... _______ .:... __ 

_ ._. Mp:tion.t.Q~uppress~_· _.' . _~_. _', _ . . .... ~rn..ot.i~t9 DiS:Mi.s1i. . __ ~ __ _ 

" •. REINsTATE PROBAf:u:iN":' <~Same Tehn'S arid com:iitioris'''" -:c5~"" . --:----REvOt.:E-PROBATlOO· ',,; ---. ..' . : . 

:=--Sa1 vat ion ArMY Wof=k:P;'09.,-t~;gi~_ ---==--=--..;.~ ~~-==- . '.-===--= _,...., __ -'"COUtlTY JAIl. .------....:;..:...~----' __ /_. ____ dsws (.,redit _'~~..;:. __ :... .... _'_'_ 

Case R~erred 'to PTI 

----Issue . Rule : to Sbo,w Cau!"..e __ . __ Mot.ion for JOO _._ .._......;.. __ . _-:....:.. __ .. ___ .... __ _ 

~==_-==DrSMI~D .~_ .. _~Defendal1t. fOt.md NOT GUILTY by JUDGE ____ NDU..E PROSEGUI ct (a) ____ . . ..•. ________ ~ __ • ____________ _ 

____ ... .Failure to ApP~l: ISSUE CAPIAS--OOND SET-1t ___________ . _. ___ _ 

_____ Estreat Bond, / 

____ TAKE CASH .BOND __ Rele~se Cash Bond _____ to _________ . _______ ~ 

____ Fines .and Costs to be paid from cash bond--Releage bacianee of cash 

food to _. ____ ~ ________________ :... __ ._...;; ;,... ..,. 

._ ... ___ ,Convert all monet.ary obligations to CIVIL LIEN 

/. . r. /)/j j _ ....... (k' , . 

. j,,,:: l.. /' -~e~~---.-- DONE AND .O~El~EJ): /'~-; 

ieTendant's Signature ('. J ~/ / [; £" / I.. f F";f. ~ r. (; " ':\/t;:r. ,.' .' 

,..;..._V- .. ____ '""'.~_ ..... ~-_. _________ -----. ------__ . ---.----

CLERK . .' }'om Co ~man., COU01:Y 'Judge 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 18

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 24 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000624

Florida Department' Of Corrections 

Office of the Inspector General 

Investigative Report - Short Form 

Classification of Incident: Employee ArresUDisorderly 

Intoxication 

Class Code: 260 

Incident Date: 08/22/2003 Time: 0007 hours 

Assigned Date: 08/26/2003 

Report Date: 0812812003 

of Corrections . II 

unty 

Sheriff 

Subject: 

Justification: (Downgrade) 

o Lack of investigative leads. 

o Management Issue - Facts known. 

Case Number: . 

Field Office: Gainesville 

Facility: 20 I-Columbia CI 

Inspector: J 

Original Case Type: C 

to: 

o State Attorneys Office declines prosecution. (No I.G. Investigative concerns). ~.t:'"" 

o Victim refuses to assist with investigation. "1(1..~ 

o Other Law Enforcement Office handling. (Arrest at DC facility) O.A'~.v~ ~' ~V/:"> o Duplicate case. ~ O~!J <..() o Non-certified employee resigned. ~S ~~ ./ I 

o M.O.U. Investigation. is'~<;4'&/)$ <'QlQlJ 

o Grievance Issue. 7C( 0)'01» 

o Other (explanation): / ~O,.<:'7g;4t-01A Exoneration: ~ -~{ 

o Incident occurred, however, the employee's actions were j.g.stified~ lawful, and proper. (Explain 

in detail in summary) 

o Incident occurred, however, it was an approved use of force. 

UOF Case Number: Date Approved: 

o Complainant admits to ,ma~ng false allegations. SEP 1 6 2003 

o The accused employee was not involved in the incident., 

o The incident did not occur. ' .' t. u:'(,.)~,~~i~Si'!~';~~;;~~:-'~'; ... ",. '; o Policy failure of the directive, order or policy the employee followed:_.-,":;;'~~--·'=~'~'-' 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 19

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 25 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000625

Florida Department Of Corrections 

Office of the Inspector General 

Investigative Report - Short Form 

Incident Class: Employee ArrestlDisorderly. Facility: 201 Columbia CI Case Number: C __ .v ... J 

Intoxication 

Arrest: r8J Employee 0 Inmate -0 Other 

Charges: F.S.S. 856.011, Disorderly Intoxication and 

F.S.S. 843.02. Resisting an Officer Without Violence. 

o Felony r8J Misdemeanor 

Date of Arrest: August 22. 2003 

Sentence of Court / 

Administrative 

Submitted to the S.A.O. 

Classification: 

Case Summary: 

-0 Guilty [gJ Addendum Pending 

o Not Guilty 

o Nolo Contendere 

o P.T.I. 

o Other (explanation): 

Date Reported: 

Exonerated Sustained 

On August 23, 2003 Correction Officer Trainee William Moore reported to Captain,. that he had 

been arrested early that morning for disorderly intoxication and resisting an officer without violence. Columbia 

County Sheriffs Office incident report/arrest report NR. 2003-027060 indicated that William Moore was 

arrested on August 28, 2003 for the above listed offenses. 

Once the courts render a final decision in this case, an addendum to this investigation will be submittc~d. 

Other Agency Case 

Sheriffs's Office incident/arrest 

VCR Classification: 

J ___ . _ -_ xn ".;] Inspector 

1It#'/I/l.. ~~~Lt:~~~:..-== pector Supervisor 

August 28. 2003 Date 

'1~/j;3 Date 

?~.te· 

Open Pendin I 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 20

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 26 of 28
EXHIBIT A, PAGE 21 McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000626

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 27 of 28
McKenzie.653489.RFP.Personnel Files.000627

-.... , . .. _-.",.... 

EXHIBIT A, PAGE 22

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 68 Filed 03/01/12 Page 28 of 28