alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009071EN.01001502.xml

| 25.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/15

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5468 — GDF Suez/GEK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 71/05)

On 19 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5468. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5468. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
|  | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | By: | Adriaan Jacobus Davel |
|--|-----|-----------------------|

|  | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|--|--------|-------------------------|

|  | Date: | November 7, 2018 |
|--|-------|------------------|
Case 3:11-cr-00020-MCR   Document 25   Filed 07/05/11   Page 1 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00020-MCR   Document 25   Filed 07/05/11   Page 2 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00020-MCR   Document 25   Filed 07/05/11   Page 3 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00020-MCR   Document 25   Filed 07/05/11   Page 4 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00020-MCR   Document 25   Filed 07/05/11   Page 5 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00020-MCR   Document 25   Filed 07/05/11   Page 6 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00020-MCR   Document 25   Filed 07/05/11   Page 7 of 8

Case 3:11-cr-00020-MCR   Document 25   Filed 07/05/11   Page 8 of 8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 

INVESTORSHUB.COM, INC., a 

Florida corporation, MATTHEW BROWN, 

an individual, and ROBERT ZUMBRUNNEN, 

an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MINA MAR GROUP, INC., a foreign 

corporation, MINA MAR GROUP INC. (OF 

THE USA), n/k/a, EMRY CAPITAL GROUP, 

INC., a foreign corporation, and MIRO 

ZACEVIC, an individual, 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________/ 

Case No.: 4:11cv9-RH/WS 

PLAINTIFF INVESTORSHUB.COM, INC.’S 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Plaintiff’s INVESTORSHUB.COM, INC., a Florida Corporation, hereby files its 

Corporate Disclosure Statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and states as 

follows: 

INVESTORSHUB, INC. is a nongovernmental corporate party. ADVFN PLC owns 

100% of the capital stock of INVESTORSHUB, INC. 

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 6 Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted, 

THOMAS & LOCICERO PL 

/s/ Deanna K. Shullman 

________________________________ 

Deanna K. Shullman 

 Florida Bar No. 0514462 

8461 Lake Worth Road 

Suite 242 

Lake Worth, FL 33467 

Telephone: (561) 340-1433 

Facsimile: (561) 340-1432 

and 

Paul R. McAdoo 

 Florida Bar No. 0036219 

400 North Ashley Drive, Suite 1100 

P.O. Box 2602 (33601) 

Tampa, FL 33602 

Telephone: (813) 984-3060 

Facsimile: (813) 984-3070 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing is being 

electronically filed and will be furnished via CM/ECF on this 16th day of February, 2011 to 

Thomas M. Findley, Esq., MESSER, CAPARELLO & SELF, P.A., PO Box 15579, Tallahassee, 

FL 32317. 

 /s/ Deanna K. Shullman 

_____________________________________ 

Attorney 

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 6 Filed 02/16/11 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date: 

11 a.m., Friday, March 9, 2007.

# Place: 

 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status: 

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered: 

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information: 

Eileen A. Donovan, 202-418-5100.

Eileen A. Donovan,

Acting Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-821 Filed 2-20-07; 11:34 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-02-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SYLVIA SHARP,

Petitioner,

v. 4:10cv372-WS

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

et al.,

Respondents.

 

ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER'S

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

November 9, 2010. See Doc. 7. The magistrate judge recommends that the

petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for failure to state a

cognizable claim for habeas corpus relief. The petitioner has filed no objections to the

report and recommendation.

Having carefully considered the report and recommendation, this court has

determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is ADOPTED and

incorporated by reference into this order of the court. 

2. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:10cv372-WS

2241 (doc. 1) is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a cognizable

claim for relief.

2. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of December , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MICHAEL R. KELLER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-77-MP-GRJ

RUSSELL HINOTE, 

and C. HOLMES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court on Doc. 17, an unexecuted summons for

Defendant Holmes that was returned with a notation that Officer Chad Holmes no

longer works for the Levy County Jail. Because Defendant Holmes still remains to be

served, the Court will direct the Levy County Jail to notify the Court whether there is a

forwarding address for Defendant Holmes and, if so, to provide that address in

confidence to the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”). 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. The Clerk shall issue a summons for Defendant Holmes indicating that

Defendant Holmes has 60 days in which to file a response to the

complaint.

2. The Clerk shall send the summons, a copy of this order, and a copy of

the amended complaint (Doc. 12), to Keith C. Tischler, Jolly & Peterson,

P.A., P.O. Box 37400, Tallahassee, FL 32315. Keith C. Tischler is the

attorney for Defendant Hinote, who is still employed at the Levy County

Jail.

3. The Mr. Tischler shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order

within which to: (1) inform the USMS office in Gainesville in confidence of

the last known address of Defendant Holmes; or (2) enter an appearance

on behalf of Defendant Holmes; or (3) advise the Court that neither

Case 1:11-cv-00077-MP-GRJ Document 20 Filed 02/10/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

alternative is possible. If the address is provided to the USMS, Mr.

Tischler shall file an appropriate notice with the Court. In such event,

Mr. Tischler shall also forward to the USMS the copy of this order,

the summons, and the service copy of the complaint. The USMS

shall protect the confidentiality of any address provided by the Levy

County Jail as required by Florida law, and shall not disclose any

such information on any document filed with the Court. Upon the

filing of such notice, the Court will issue further instructions for service of

process.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10 day of February 2012. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:11-cv-77-MP-GRJ

Case 1:11-cv-00077-MP-GRJ Document 20 Filed 02/10/12 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:10-cr-00050-MCR Document 42 Filed 08/15/11 Page 1 of 8Case 3:10-cr-00050-MCR Document 42 Filed 08/15/11 Page 2 of 8Case 3:10-cr-00050-MCR Document 42 Filed 08/15/11 Page 3 of 8Case 3:10-cr-00050-MCR Document 42 Filed 08/15/11 Page 4 of 8Case 3:10-cr-00050-MCR Document 42 Filed 08/15/11 Page 5 of 8Case 3:10-cr-00050-MCR Document 42 Filed 08/15/11 Page 6 of 8Case 3:10-cr-00050-MCR Document 42 Filed 08/15/11 Page 7 of 8Case 3:10-cr-00050-MCR Document 42 Filed 08/15/11 Page 8 of 8
# C_2011172EN.01001601.xml

| 11.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/16

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 June 2011

2011/C 172/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4486 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,00 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4578 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88840 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0885 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2190 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8555 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,133 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7089 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9354 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1560 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2828 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3644 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4075 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2742 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7531 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7841 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 568,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7930 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3872 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3948 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 342,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3748 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,729 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3025 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,023 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2976 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0689 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,7740 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4486

JPY

Japanese yen

116,00

DKK

Danish krone

7,4578

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88840

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0885

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2190

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8555

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,133

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7089

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9354

RON

Romanian leu

4,1560

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2828

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3644

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4075

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2742

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7531

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7841

KRW

South Korean won

1 568,32

ZAR

South African rand

9,7930

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3872

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3948

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 342,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3748

PHP

Philippine peso

62,729

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3025

THB

Thai baht

44,023

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2976

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0689

INR

Indian rupee

64,7740

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Profile LV, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




























By:
/s/  Christian AngstadtName:
Christian AngstadtTitle:
Chief Financial Officer ofDemeter Management LLC,General Partner of the registrantDate:
November 12, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ANTHONY JEFFERSON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 437 WAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 1st day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowa nce of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:01CR107/LAC/MD

JIMMY MERCHANT, SR.

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on November 20, 2006

Motion/Pleadings: Petitioner’s Objection to the Magistrate’s Construal of the Certificate of

Appealability Motion as a Notice of Appeal and Incorporated Motion to Strike Entry Therewith

Filed byDEFENDANT on11/17/06 Doc.# 210

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Donna Bajzik

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Donna Bajzik

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 29th day of

November, 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) This court will construe a notice of appeal filed alone as a request for

certificate of appealability and vice versa. In its order denying defendant’s

request for a certificate of appealability, the court found that defendant had

not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, which is

tantamount to the “merits adjudication” on said motion that he purports to seek.

If defendant wishes to voluntarily dismiss his appeal, he may do so via separate

motion. If he wishes to seek extensions of procedural deadlines, he may move for

such relief by appropriate motion. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:01-cr-00107-LC-MD Document 212 Filed 11/29/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2015 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas Polinsky, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph A. Geraci, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the
                                         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report
                                         fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                                         of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|May 12, 2015 | /s/
    Douglas Polinsky
|------------ | ------------------------
|             | DouglasPolinsky         
|             | Chief Executive Officer 
|             |                         
|May 12, 2015 | /s/ Joseph A. Geraci, II
|             | JosephA. Geraci, II     
|             | Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

AHMED NASR OSMAN,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:11-cv-147-SPM-WCS

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., et al.,

Respondents.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 14). Petitioner has been mailed a copy and has been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report

and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 14) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The § 2241 petition is dismissed as moot.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this fourteenth day of June, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00147-SPM-WCS Document 19 Filed 06/14/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MICHAEL DARRELL ROBINSON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 1:11cv24/MP/GRJ

DETECTIVE MICHAEL POWERS,

Defendant.

______________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May 23, 2012. (Doc. 25). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 19) is DENIED.

3. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Final Judgment (doc. 20) is GRANTED.

The clerk shall enter final judgment in favor of defendant and close the file.

DONE and ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00024-MP-GRJ Document 28 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mark Steven Rascoe v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-12-01175-CR

Trial court case number: 1834994

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 10 of Harris County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court on April 10, 2014. In the abatement 

order, we directed the trial court to determine whether appellant wished to pursue the appeal, and 

if so, whether or not appellant’s counsel, Michael S. Driver, intended to abandon the appeal. The 

trial court held a hearing on our abatement order on May 19, 2014. The court reporter has filed a 

reporter’s record showing that appellant intended to pursue the appeal and appellant’s counsel 

did not abandon the appeal. Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active 

docket.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).

Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of 

appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 19, 2014
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v. Case No. 3:10cr103/MCR

KENNETH EUGENE HAYNES

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE
AS TO DEFENDANT KENNETH EUGENE HAYNES

WHEREAS, on December 15, 2010, the Court entered a Preliminary Order of
Forfeiture, pursuant to the provisions of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2253 and
2428 (as well as other relevant statutes), based upon the defendant’s guilty plea to Counts
One and Two of the indictment in this action, and the attached forfeiture provision thereto,
of the property listed as:
(A) 2005 Mercedes-Benz CLK, VIN #WDBTK65G15T037272;
(B) 2007 31.8' Regal Watercraft, HIN #RGMVF146H607,
USCG DOC #D01223798;

(C) Dell Optiplex 740 Tower Computer System with two hard drives,
(Serial #46RY8016A and #3JVCXBAO);

(D) Maxtor external hard drive (Serial #2HAABCGN);

(E) HP laptop computer (Serial #CNF74321LY);

(F) Web Logitech camera;

FILED IN OPEN COURT THIS

2-0 201!

CLERK, U.S. DiS
COURT, NORTH. DIST. FLA


(G) Sony cyber-shot digital camera (#DSC-T100); and

(H) — Sprint cellular telephone utilizing #XXX-XXX-9090.

AND WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 32(b)(2) and 32.2(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of
Criminal Procedure said Preliminary Order of Forfeiture shall be made final as to defendant
KENNETH EUGENE HAYNES at the time of sentencing and shall be made part of the
sentence and included in the judgment, now wherefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

That all of defendant KENNETH EUGENE HAYNES’ right, title and interest in
the property described above is hereby forfeited to and vested in the United States of
America and that said forfeiture is now final as to the defendant for all purposes.

IT IS SO ORDERED this [Day of March, 2011.

WM. Case,

M. CASEY Rover
UNITED STATES MASTRICT JUDGE