alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 
 OBALON THERAPEUTICS, INC.
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Nooshin Hussainy, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q of Obalon Therapeutics, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
 
 Date: June 24, 2020/s/ Nooshin HussainyNooshin HussainyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 14 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 14 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 14 Filed 11/27/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:11-cr-00024-MCR   Document 240   Filed 02/18/12   Page 1 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00024-MCR   Document 240   Filed 02/18/12   Page 2 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00024-MCR   Document 240   Filed 02/18/12   Page 3 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00024-MCR   Document 240   Filed 02/18/12   Page 4 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00024-MCR   Document 240   Filed 02/18/12   Page 5 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00024-MCR   Document 240   Filed 02/18/12   Page 6 of 7

Case 3:11-cr-00024-MCR   Document 240   Filed 02/18/12   Page 7 of 7
# C_2011178EN.01000301.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 June 2011

2011/C 178/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4270 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,71 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4592 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88260 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1887 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2103 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8695 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,130 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,66 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9729 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2270 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2779 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3440 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3967 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1246 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7650 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7621 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 553,37 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6954 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2363 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4063 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 267,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3252 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,426 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0605 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,638 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2840 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9806 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,0260 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4270

JPY

Japanese yen

114,71

DKK

Danish krone

7,4592

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88260

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1887

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2103

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8695

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,130

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,66

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9729

RON

Romanian leu

4,2270

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2779

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3440

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3967

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1246

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7650

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7621

KRW

South Korean won

1 553,37

ZAR

South African rand

9,6954

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2363

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4063

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 267,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3252

PHP

Philippine peso

62,426

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0605

THB

Thai baht

43,638

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2840

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9806

INR

Indian rupee

64,0260

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Joel R. Jung, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of Celera Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 27, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Celera Corporation. 

Date: November 10, 2008
**Exhibit No. 32.1**Form 10-Q        Latin America Ventures, Inc.        File No. 0-53132          

     **Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted             Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Latin America Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Pierre Galoppi, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18        U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) |   | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |   |   |
|--------|-----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|        |     |        |                                                                                                                                                 |        |        |
|   | (2) |   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |   |   |

 

| Dated: November 9, 2009 |   |   | /s/ Pierre Galoppi            |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                         |   |   | Pierre Galoppi                |   |   |
|                         |   |   | Chief Executive Officer  |   |
|                         |   |   | and Chief Financial Officer   |   |

 

----

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Latin America Ventures, Inc. and will be retained by Latin America Ventures, Inc. furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 73777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6251]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding The Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Wednesday January 16, 2008.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered:  Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person For More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-6251 Filed 12-26-07; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
#### STATE v. ABLE

No. 108 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 365.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 16 June 1972.
December 22 , 2011



### JUDGMENT



## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PEDRO CASTRO

- MARQUEZ , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00314

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED , and that this decision be certified below for

observa nce.
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 5:11cv107-RH/EMT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ROBERT LYMAN BREHM,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv107-RH/EMT

PAIGE AUGUSTINE, WARDEN,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This case is before the court on the report and recommendation, ECF No. 14, 

and the objections, ECF No. 16. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the 

objections. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating:

The petitioner’s claim that he is entitled to release from custody 

because he posted a bond is DENIED with prejudice. The petitioner’s 

claim that he is entitled to early release because the Bureau of Prisons 

improperly delayed his enrollment in the Residential Drug Abuse 

Case 5:11-cv-00107-RH-EMT Document 17 Filed 11/01/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:11cv107-RH/EMT

Program is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust 

administrative remedies. 

The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on November 1, 2011.

Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-00107-RH-EMT Document 17 Filed 11/01/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RAY CHRIS MOBLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-183-RS-EMT

BETHANY HARRIS,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17). 

No objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s 

failure to prosecute or failure to comply with an order of the 

court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on February 9, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00183-RS-EMT Document 18 Filed 02/09/12 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:11cr3-SPM

DONALD IVORY, 

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One and Five of this

indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing

Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a

report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties

consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it

is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.
Page 2 of 3

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:11cr3-SPM
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on February 15, 2011. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:11cr3-SPM
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 234 (Thursday, December 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 68900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5982]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Foreign Claims Settlement Commission

[F.C.S.C. Meeting Notice No. 8-07]


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, pursuant to its 
regulations (45 CFR part 504) and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 
U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of 
meetings for the transaction of Commission business and other matters 
specified, as follows:

Date and Time:  Friday, December 14, 2007, at 2:30 p.m.

Subject Matter:  Issuance of Proposed Decisions, Amended Proposed 
Decisions, and Amended Final Decisions in claims against Albania.

Status:  Open.
    All meetings are held at the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 
600 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. Requests for information, or advance 
notices of intention to observe an open meeting, may be directed to: 
Administrative Officer, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission, 600 E 
Street, NW., Room 6002, Washington, DC 20579. Telephone: (202) 616-
6988.

    Dated at Washington, DC.
Mauricio J. Tamargo,
Chairman.
[FR Doc. 07-5982 Filed 12-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-P
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HARRY MICHAEL WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-474-SPM-GRJ

MORRIS YOUNG, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

On January 30, 2013, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to issue subpoenas to

non-parties Florida Sheriff’s Self-Insurance Fund, and the Board of County

Commissioners of Gadsden County. These subpoenas will be served by the United

States Marshals Service. However, while Plaintiff has provided a street address for

physical service for the Board of County Commissioners of Gadsden County, he has

provided a post office box but not a street address for the Florida Sheriff’s SelfInsurance Fund. As personal service cannot be effected upon a post office box,

Plaintiff will be required to provide a street address for the Florida Sheriff’s SelfInsurance Fund so that service can be made.

Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

Plaintiff must provide a street address for the Florida Sheriff’s Self-Insurance

Fund on or before February 24, 2013. Upon receipt of the street address, the United

States Marshals Service will be directed to serve the subpoenas by separate order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14 day of February 2013.

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BETTY JEAN GODDIN,

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 3:11cv68/RV/CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court upon plaintiff’s application for attorney’s fees

(doc. 19), filed pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. §

2412(d), and defendant’s response (doc. 20). Plaintiff’s counsel requested

reimbursement in the amount of $2,125.00 under the EAJA. (Doc. 19, 1) Plaintiff’s

counsel filed a time itemization accounting that shows 17.0 hours as the total time

spent representing plaintiff in this court. (Doc. 19-2) In its response, defendant did

not oppose the application for attorney’s fees and requested that the court award fees

under the EAJA in the amount of $2,125.00. (Doc. 20, 1) The court concludes that

an award of attorney’s fees is justified under the EAJA, in light of the

Commissioner’s agreement.

The Commissioner asks that the fee be distributed in accordance with Astrue

v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), but does not directly allege or show that plaintiff

owes a debt to the United States. Although Ratliff applies, the fee should be “paid

directly to counsel aslong asthe Government is afforded an opportunity to offset any

Case 3:11-cv-00068-RV-CJK Document 21 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

preexisting debt owed by the plaintiff . . . .” Meyer v. Astrue, Civ. No. 09–3205

(MJD/LIB), 2011 WL 4036398, at *3 (D. Minn. 2011).

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That the application for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act

(doc. 19) be GRANTED in the amount of $2,125.00, and the Commissioner be

ordered to pay that amount to plaintiff’s counsel. The Commissioner will follow

Astrue v. Ratliff, but must make prompt payment of the amount due, as no showing

of an outstanding federal debt has been made to date.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 30th day of January, 2012.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITEDSTATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon the magistrate judge and all

other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual

findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:11cv68/RV/CJK

Case 3:11-cv-00068-RV-CJK Document 21 Filed 01/30/12 Page 2 of 2
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Hanover Insurance Company ) ) Under Contract No. W912QR-09-D-0045 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61481

Eric J. Hughes, Esq. Rory M. Farrell, Esq. Kyle H. Cassidy, Esq.

McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney &

Carpenter, LLP Morristown, NJ Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Deena G. Braunstein, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorney U.S. Army Engineer District, Louisville ORDER OF DISMISSAL The appeal has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: October 4, 2018

rative Judge Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61481, Appeal ofHanover Insurance Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7623

TEON JAMELL WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Frank D. Whitney, 

Chief District Judge. (5:16-cv-00061-FDW)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Teon Jamell Williams, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Teon Jamell Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS .•- P.O.' BOX 12308, CAPII0LJ§TAT4PN,AUSTIN.JfiXAS 78711

OFFICIAL BUS5MESS

STATE OF TEXAS *%&>*

FEWALTY FOR ri' ** t

2/25/2015PRIVATE USE

WILLIAMS, BILLY _ ,„.-,-«.

On this day, the application for;1i:07^WritLof;Habeas Corpus has been"reoeived

and presented to the Court. ''''^•'"r-fi'M^/t'^

Abel Acosta, Clerk

>•:).?.'-

,n<0

•So

fr. Ql'ftojpjppgar

-«*•

^ BILLY WILLIAMS

POLUNSKY UNIT - TDC # 1042330

3872 FM350S.

LIVINGSTON, TX 77351

•tiJi.iviMi: jj^!..j

MAR02 2015

MAIUED FROM Z1P ^ftfg^Voi
EX-10.8



 Exhibit 10.8 

TPG BIOTECH DRAFT 6/1/06 

August 7, 2006 
 PRIVATE &
CONFIDENTIAL 
 Robert F.G. Booth Ph.D. 
 [Home address]

 Dear Dr. Booth: 
 As you know, TPG
Biotechnology Partners II, L.P. (the “Fund”) intends to make a controlling investment in Virobay, Inc. (the “Company”). The Fund agrees that, to the extent it makes a controlling investment in the Company, you will be the
Executive Chairman of the Company. Your starting base salary will be $225,000 per annum, which will be subject to customary withholdings and will be payable in accordance with the Company’s customary payroll practices. 

You will be entitled to receive an equity interest in the Company to the extent you materially contribute to the Fund’s investment of
such company. Your initial equity interest in the Company will be in stock options representing 2.5% of the total equity of the Company on a fully diluted basis. Your participation in the equity of the Company will be subject to the terms and
conditions of any equity participation and incentive plans established by the Company from time to time. Specifically, the vesting schedule will be over four years. In addition, you will receive 100% accelerated vesting on a change of control
situation with a double trigger. 
 This offer of employment does not constitute an employment contract, and if you accept this offer, your
employment with the Company will be “at will.” This means your employment will not be for a specific term and, but rather your employment will be terminable at any time by you or the Company with or without reason or notice. 

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please execute both copies of this letter agreement, retain one copy for your file, and return the
other copy to the undersigned. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	TPG BIOTECHNOLOGY PARTNERS II, L.P.
	By:	 	TPG Biotechnology GenPar II, L.P.,
		 	its General Partner
	By:	 	TPG Biotech Advisors II, LLC,
		 	its General Partner
		
	By:	 	  

		 	David A. Spuria, Vice President










	
	AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
	
	August 7, 2006
	
	 /s/ Robert F. G. Booth

	Robert F.G. Booth Ph.D.