alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            4926
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      185
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           13516
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   14406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3000
<OTHER-SE>                                        9472
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     14406
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   760
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   866
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (49)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (57)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (57)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of alpha-En Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jerome I. Feldman, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




April 1, 2011




/s/ Jerome I. FeldmanJerome I. FeldmanChairman, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer

and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     UT
<LEGEND>
  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
  THE STATEMENT OF INCOME, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS, BALANCE SHEET, AND
  STATEMENT OF COMMON STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>         0000201533
<NAME>        CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       4,368
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                       720
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                            523
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        1,205
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  6,816
<COMMON>                                          841
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                         504
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                               368
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  1,754
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             100
<PREFERRED>                                       356
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            1,188
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                241
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                         424
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                     350
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        88
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   40
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  2,316
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   6,816
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       1,956
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               90
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      1,626
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      1,716
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                           240
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                  4
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                    244
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           85
<NET-INCOME>                                      159
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        18
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                     141
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           70
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of Advisory Committee Meetings. 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Science Board Task Force on Nuclear Deterrence Skills met in closed session on February 22-23, 2007; at the Strategic Analysis Inc., 3601 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA. The mission of the Defense Science Board is to advise the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology & Logistics on scientific and technical matters as they affect the perceived needs of the Department of Defense. At these meetings, the Defense Science Board Task Force will: Assess all aspects of nuclear deterrent skills as well as the progress Department of Energy (DoE) has made since the publication of the Chiles Commission report.

In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. No. 92-463, as amended (5 U.S.C. App. II), it has been determined that these Defense Science Board Task Force meetings concern matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and that, accordingly, the meetings will be closed to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        LCDR Clifton Phillips, USN, Defense Science Board, 3140 Defense Pentagon, Room 3C553, Washington, DC 20301-3140, via e-mail at                         *clifton.phillips@osd.mil,*                         or via phone at (703) 571-0083.                    

Due to scheduling difficulties, there is insufficient time to provide timely notice required by Section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and Subsection 102-3.150(b) of the GSA Final Rule on Federal Advisory Committee Management, 41 CFR part 102-3.150(b), which further requires publication at least 15 calendar days prior to the meeting.

Dated: February 22, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 07-895 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information oncerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; In Vitro Testing Resources for AIDS Therapeutics Development.                    

*Date:*                         March 16, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday Inn Chevy Chase, 5520 Wisconsin Avenue, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Barney Duane Price, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Program, DHHS/NIH/NIAID/DEA, Room 3139, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, (301) 451-2592,                         *pricebd@niaid.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 23, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-963 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 21

- 00381

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.J.C. , a Child

From the 407th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA02145

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding 1

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE WATKINS , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s September 10, 2021

order of termination is AFFIRMED as to appellant M.L.C. a/k/a M.L.S. It is ORDERED that no

costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal because she is presumed indigent under

Texas Family Code section 107.013(e).

SIGNED February 16, 2022.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice

1 The order on appeal was signed by the Honorable Charles E. Montemayor. The Honorable Martha B. Tanner

presided over the trial and orally rendered the judgment of termination.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5400 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5400

 To prohibit the Secretary of Education and the Attorney General from 
   encouraging certain policies or agreements between elementary and 
         secondary schools and local law enforcement agencies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2018

 Mr. Grothman (for himself, Mr. Rokita, Mr. Meadows, Mr. DeSantis, Mr. 
  Conaway, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. Perry, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. King of 
Iowa, Mr. Flores, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Harris, Mr. Sanford, and Mr. Gosar) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of Education and the Attorney General from 
   encouraging certain policies or agreements between elementary and 
         secondary schools and local law enforcement agencies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Make Schools Safe Again Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN POLICIES OR AGREEMENTS WITH LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES.

    Neither the Secretary of Education nor the Attorney General shall 
authorize or otherwise encourage a State educational agency, local 
educational agency, or an elementary school or secondary school to have 
a policy or agreement with local law enforcement agencies to not refer 
a student suspected of committing any criminal activity (including a 
misdemeanor or felony under State or Federal law) to such an agency.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the terms ``elementary school'', ``local educational 
agency'', ``secondary school'', and ``State educational agency'' have 
the meanings given the terms in section 8101 of the Elementary and 
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is made of the availability of licensing of the invention set forth in U.S. Patent Application No. 11/460,593 entitled “Method of Inducing and Sealing Cracks in Vessels,” filed on July 27, 2006. The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights in this invention. 

# ADDRESSES:

Office of Research and Technology Applications, SDMC-RDTC-TDL (Ms. Susan D. McRae), Bldg. 5220, Von Braun Complex, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Joan Gilsdorf, Patent Attorney, e-mail:                         *joan.gilsdorf@smdc.army.mil*; (256) 955-3213 or Ms. Susan D. McRae, Office of Research and Technology Applications, e-mail:                         *susan.mcrae@smdc.army.mil*; (256) 955-1501.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The invention pertains to inducing and sealing cracks in newly constructed containment vessels, such as linerless composite tanks, that are subject to crack propagation during the life of the vessels. The cracks are sealed before the vessel is placed in service to prevent or reduce leakage of the fluids that are stored in the vessels. 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07-721 Filed 2-15-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:11cr24-SPM

CORNELIUS THOMPSON, 

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One, Two, Three and Four

of this indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing

Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a

report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties

consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it

is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.
Page 2 of 3

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:11cr24-SPM/WCS
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on April 18, 2011. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:11cr24-SPM/WCS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

GREGORY ROLAND,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv36/M/GRJ

JERRY B MILLER,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated September 26, 2011. (Doc. 8). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The first amended complaint (doc. 4) is dismissed for failure to prosecute and

for failure to comply with a court order.

DONE and ORDERED this 26th day of October, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00036-MP-GRJ Document 9 Filed 10/26/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RONNIE DYSON, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv135-MP-GRJ

REGIONS BANK, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated December 20, 2011. (Doc. 8). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. This case is DISMISSED for failure to comply with an order of the Court and

for failure to prosecute.

DONE and ORDERED this 19th day of January, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00135-MP-GRJ Document 9 Filed 01/19/12 Page 1 of 1