alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-KSB
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                             452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      932
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        651
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,195
<PP&E>                                           1,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,512
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,795
<OTHER-SE>                                       (469)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,806
<SALES>                                         16,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,998
<CGS>                                           13,375
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (91)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,350)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       171
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,521)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,251)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 34 (Wednesday, February 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7899]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel, NRSA for Interdiscplinary Individual Postdoctoral 
Fellowships for Training in Neurodegeneration Research (F32).
    Date: March 20, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Meenaxi Hiremath, PhD, Health Scientist 
Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on 
Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, 6101 Executive 
Blvd., Suite 220, MSC 8401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7964, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99f4f1aaa0abfed9f7f0f1b7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6805005b515a0f28060100460f071e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug 
Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 13, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-757 Filed 2-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March

1 4 , 2023

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00107

- CV

METROPOLITAN WATER COMPANY, LP AND MET WATER VISTA RIDGE, LP , Appellant s

V.

BLUE WATER SYSTEMS, LP AND BLUE WATER VISTA RIDGE, LLC , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 21st District Court Washington County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 37412

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an order signed March 25, 2022. On February 28,
2023, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.2

We dismiss the appeal

.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Ch ristopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the amended quarterly report of Novagen Solar Inc. on Form
10-Q  for  the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Mills, President,
Chief  Executive  Officer,  Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Principal Accounting
Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 8, 2010     By /s/ Thomas Mills
                           Thomas Mills
                           President, Chief Executive Officer
                           Chief Financial Officer, and
                           Principal Accounting Officer
NIOSH research confirms the 

need for annual testing:10% of 

subjects failed a fit test after 

1 year using the same make, 

model, and size respirator.

NIOSH research also suggests 

that those who have lost > 20lbs 

should prioritize getting fit tested 

again right away. Other facial 

changes requiring fit testing include 

significant weight gain, extensive dental work, 

scarring, or cosmetic surgery.

Respirator fit CAN change 

over time. If your respirator 

doesn’t fit, it doesn’t work.

If the respirator fit is unacceptable, 

the worker must be given the 

opportunity to select a different 

respirator and be retested. 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Center for Disease Control and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

NIOSH Facts

Why are annual

FIT TESTS required?

OSHA requires annual fit testing: 29 CFR 1910.134

Time for your annual 

fit testing!

It usually only takes 

15–20 minutes.

Bottom line...

Administrator Worker

Can we do this another day? 

I’ve got so much to do.

I’m busy. You’re busy. Why 

is it necessary to do this 

EVERY YEAR?

If your respirator doesn’t fit, it can’t efficiently protect you. 

OSHA requires annual fit testing: 29 CFR 1910.134

Sources: OSHA Fit Testing Procedures 1910.134, Appendix A, https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=9780

New NIOSH Study Supports the OSHA Annual Fit Testing Requirements for Filtering Facepiece Respirators, http://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2016/01/05/fit-testing/
EXHIBIT 32.1  Section 1350 Certification  I, Ronald Mumford, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Pacific Edge Publishing, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Edge Publishing, Inc.  August 12, 2008 By: /s/ Ronald Mumford Ronald Mumford, President Principal Executive Officer, Director   [A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Pacific Edge Publishing, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Edge  Publishing, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

GUS PASKO,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:11cv46-SPM/GRJ

PATRICK A. CAREY, PA,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to the Notice of Settlement (doc. 6) and Northern District of

Florida Local Rule 16.2(D), it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

2. The Court retains jurisdiction for a period of 60 days, during which

time any party may move to reopen for good cause shown.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of April, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Profile MV, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




























By:
/s/  Christian AngstadtName:
Christian AngstadtTitle:
Chief Financial Officer ofDemeter Management LLC,General Partner of the registrantDate:
May 14, 2010
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of The Blackhawk Fund, a Nevada corporation,
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Frank Marshik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/
      Frank Marshik


Frank
Marshik,


President


(Chief
Executive Officer and


Chief
Financial Officer)


April 15,
2010
# C_2011244EN.01000401.xml

| 23.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6306 — 3i Group/Action Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 244/03

On 12 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6306. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6306. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
14-4624

People v. Actavis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

ORDER

1 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second 

2 Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley 

Square, in the City of New York, on the 22 3 nd day of May, two thousand fifteen.

4

5 Before: WALKER, RAGGI, and DRONEY, Circuit Judges.

6 _________________________________________________

7

8 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by and through ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN,

9 Attorney General of the State of New York,

10 Plaintiff-Appellee,

11

12 v. No. 14-4624

13

14 ACTAVIS PLC, FOREST LABORATORIES, LLC,

15 Defendants-Appellants.

16 _________________________________________________

17

18 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, 

19 AND DECREED that the order of the district court granting New York’s motion 

20 for a preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED. An opinion has been filed under seal 

21 concurrently with this order. The parties of record may obtain copies of the 

22 sealed opinion from the Clerk’s Office.

23

24 The parties are hereby ORDERED to show cause why the opinion should 

25 not be unsealed and to submit any proposed redactions, by May 26, 2015 at 

26 1:00pm. The parties may file their submissions under seal. Absent any 

27 submission from the parties, the opinion will be unsealed in full.

28

29 FOR THE COURT:

30 Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk

31

1
1 

2
# C_2011144EN.01000501.xml

| 14.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6164 — Barclays Bank/EGG Credit Card Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 144/02

On 18 April 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6164. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6164. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, Development of Novel Drug Delivery Systems for Treatment Medications.                    

*Date:*                         March 1, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1:30 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Eric Zatman, Contract Review Specialist, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, (301) 435-1438.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.
      ( print page 7899)    
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 13, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-756 Filed 2-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT 4.8.4**

*Ministry of the Russian Federation for Communications and Information*

**Amendment No. 4****to License No. 15130 (registration series A 014207)****dated June 13, 2000**

To add the following additional paragraph to clause 1 of the Conditions For Carrying Out Activities Under License No. 15130:

“Under this License, the Licensee may provide cellular radiotelephone communications services in GSM 900/1800 dual band network and install necessary equipment to operate in the frequencies allocated in the 1800 and 900 MHz band in the license area in accordance with the established procedure.”

 

| **First Deputy Minister****of the Russian Federation for****Communications and Information** |   | [Signature]       |   | Yu.A. Pavlenko   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|------------------|
|                                                                                         |   |              |   |             |
|                                                                                         |   |              |   | January 18, 2002 |
|                                                                                         |   |              |   |             |
| **Head of the Department****of the Organization****of Licensing Activity**                   |   | [Signature][Seal] |   | N.M. Popov  |

17
#### STATE v. TAYLOR

No. 170 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 703.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1972.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0001023905
<NAME> GEOTEL COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          36,870
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,428
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,254
<PP&E>                                           3,224
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,311
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,167
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,612
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,167
<SALES>                                          3,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,008
<CGS>                                               78
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,707
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                981
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       981
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
December 22 , 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PEDRO CASTRO-MARQUEZ, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00314-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.