alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

GLENDA W. WEEKLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:10cv427/RV/CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

__________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated November 1, 2011. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:10-cv-00427-RV-CJK Document 23 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 2
2. The application for disability insurance benefits is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of December, 2011. 

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 3:10-cv-00427-RV-CJK Document 23 Filed 12/05/11 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Foreign Agricultural Service

# AGENCY:

Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice to reestablish board of evaluators.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of Agriculture has reestablished the Edward R. Madigan United States Agricultural Export Excellence Award Board of Evaluators. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that the Board is necessary and in the public interest.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Office of Trade Programs, Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA, Room 450 Portals, 1250 Maryland Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20024, telephone: (202) 690-0752, fax: (202) 690-3270, e-mail:                         *Dale.Miller@fas.usda.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of the Edward R. Madigan United States Agricultural Export Excellence Award Board of Evaluators is to advise the Secretary of Agriculture on the selection of recipients for the Edward R. Madigan United States Agricultural Export Excellence Award.

      ( print page 63548)    
Dated: November 1, 2007.

Michael W. Yost,

Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.

[FR Doc. 07-5607 Filed 11-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-10-M
Case 3:10-cv-00379-MCR-EMT   Document 92-1   Filed 03/13/14   Page 1 of 6

Case 3:10-cv-00379-MCR-EMT   Document 92-1   Filed 03/13/14   Page 2 of 6

Case 3:10-cv-00379-MCR-EMT   Document 92-1   Filed 03/13/14   Page 3 of 6

Case 3:10-cv-00379-MCR-EMT   Document 92-1   Filed 03/13/14   Page 4 of 6

Case 3:10-cv-00379-MCR-EMT   Document 92-1   Filed 03/13/14   Page 5 of 6

Case 3:10-cv-00379-MCR-EMT   Document 92-1   Filed 03/13/14   Page 6 of 6
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JENNIFER LOUISE ROZIER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv508-RH/WCS

LONNIE SEAY et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 7. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is dismissed

without prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on June 18, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00508-RH-WCS Document 8 Filed 06/21/11 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-836]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--VSI Alliance

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 12, 2007, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), VSI Alliance has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Synplicity, Inc., 
Sunnyvale, CA; and Altera Corp., San Jose, CA have been added as 
parties to this venture. Also, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, JAPAN; FZI--
Forschungszentrum Informatick and der University, Karlsruhe, GERMANY; 
LTRIM Technologies, Inc., Laval, Quebec, CANADA; and Hewlett-Packard 
Company, Palo Alto, CA have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and VSI Alliance intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 29, 1996, VSI Alliance filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on March 4, 1997 (62 FR 9812).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on October 23, 
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on November 22, 2006 (71 FR 67643).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-836 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6383

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ORRIN LAMAR JACKSON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-85) Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 29, 2000 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Orrin Lamar Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Orrin L. Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Jackson , No. CR-90-85(W.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2000). To the extent that Jackson seeks to appeal from his December 13, 1990, judgment of conviction and sentence, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 10(h)**

**AMENDMENT TO THE**

**TXU DEFERRED AND INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN**

**TRUST AGREEMENT**

WHEREAS, TXU Corp.(“Company”) sponsors and maintains the TXU Deferred and Incentive Compensation Plan (“Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, the Companyentered into a Trust Agreement with Mellon Bank, N.A. to provide for the payment of benefits under the Plan, dated as of September 4, 2002 (“Trust”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to make certain amendments to the Trust to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Code Section 409A), and to cause the Trust to be consistentwith certain changes made to the Plan regarding such payments under Code Section 409A; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust is hereby amended asfollows, effective as of the date hereof. 

1. Section 1(e) of the Trust is deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the following:

“(e) [RESERVED]” 

2. Section 1(f) of the Trust is deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the following: 

“(f) [RESERVED]” 

3. Section 11(b) of the Trust is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 

“(b) The Trustee may be removed by the Committee on thirty (30) days’ written notice or upon shorter notice accepted by the Trustee.”

4. Section 13(c) of the Trust is hereby deleted in its entirety. 

5. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Trust shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this Amendment. 

The Company and the Trustee hereby each represents and warrants to the other that it has full authority to enter into this Amendment upon the terms andconditions hereof and that the individual executing this Amendment on its behalf has the requisite authority to bind the Company and the Trustee, respectively, to this Amendment. 

This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts. 

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 

**TXU CORP.**

By:
 
/s/ Riz Chand
 Riz Chand Senior Vice President, Human Resources
**MELLON BANK, N.A.**

By:
 
/s/ Joyce Root

Dated: October 5, 2007 

 

2
Exhibit 31(c)

TXU CORP.

Certificate Pursuant to Section 302

of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CEO

I, C. John Wilder, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of TXU Corp.; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 30,
2007



/s/ C. John WilderSignature:

C. John WilderTitle:

Chairman, President and CEO
EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES

      Smart One Learning Systems, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, was formed on February 28, 2002 to license and market the Company's
software.

     The Baseball Club, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was
formed on February 28, 2002, to license and market the Company's software.

     Recording Artists Worldwide, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, was formed on August 27, 2003, to license and market the Company's
software.

     Articles of incorporation for Your True Voice Studios, Inc., a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, were delivered to the Nevada Secretary
of State's office on April 16, 2004, and the Company anticipates this
corporation will be officially formed in late April 2004.  It is being formed
for the purpose of assisting voice coaches in marketing and further developing
their businesses.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of National Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Goldwasser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Mark GoldwasserMark GoldwasserChief Executive Officer

December 29, 2010
# C_2011108EN.01000501.xml

| 7.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 April 2011

2011/C 108/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4300 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,82 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4569 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87750 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0124 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3097 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7850 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,426 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 263,24 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9858 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1005 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1762 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3766 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3714 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1215 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8455 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8021 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 552,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5624 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3579 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3720 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 371,78 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3258 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,641 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,115 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2940 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8597 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,1630 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4300

JPY

Japanese yen

121,82

DKK

Danish krone

7,4569

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87750

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0124

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3097

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7850

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,426

HUF

Hungarian forint

263,24

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9858

RON

Romanian leu

4,1005

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1762

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3766

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3714

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1215

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8455

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8021

KRW

South Korean won

1 552,65

ZAR

South African rand

9,5624

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3579

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3720

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 371,78

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3258

PHP

Philippine peso

61,641

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3300

THB

Thai baht

43,115

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2940

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8597

INR

Indian rupee

63,1630

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JEAN E. JOSEPH,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:11cv34-MP/CAS

OFFICER R. GORMAN, 

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

The Clerk of Court has received numerous mail returns in this case. Docs. 80,

83, 84, 94, 96, and 97. Plaintiff has just recently filed a notice of change of address. 

Doc. 98. The Clerk of Court will provide Plaintiff with a copy of the prior court orders

which Plaintiff did not receive (docs. 92, 95). This Order cautions Plaintiff that,

considering the number of mail returns received, leniency is running low. Plaintiff must

keep the Court informed as to his current mailing address. Further mail returns will not

be tolerated. 

Prior court orders provided that Plaintiff would have until February 8, 2013, to

respond to the Defendant's motion for summary judgment, doc. 86. In light of the mail

problems, Plaintiff will have an extension of time in which to submit his response. 
Page 2 of 2

Plaintiff's response must be filed on or before March 1, 2013. Plaintiff was previously

advised of his obligation to respond to the summary judgment motion under Rule 56

and N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 56.1. Doc. 88. The Clerk of Court will provide another copy of

that Order to Plaintiff to aid him in responding.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. The Clerk of Court shall re-mail to Plaintiff a copy of these Orders: Docs. 88,

92, and 95. 

2. Plaintiff shall have until March 1, 2013, in which to file his opposition to

Defendant's summary judgment motion.

3. Plaintiff shall immediately file a notice to the Clerk's Office should his mailing

address change in any way. Failure to comply with this Court Order may result in a

recommendation of dismissal of this action.

4. The Clerk of Court shall return this file upon receipt of Plaintiff's response in

opposition to summary judgment or no later than March 1, 2013.

DONE AND ORDERED on February 6, 2013.

s/ Charles A. Stampelos 

CHARLES A. STAMPELOS 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 4:11cv34-MP/CAS
# C_2011198EN.01000201.xml

| 6.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6181 — SEB Trygg Liv Holding/Irish Life International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 198/03

On 27 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6181. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6181. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Energy Quest Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wilfred J. Ouellette, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 9, 2010

*/s/ Wilfred J. Ouellette*

Wilfred J. Ouellette

President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2010305EN.01000201.xml

| 11.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6016 — Sun Capital/Divisie Vroom & Dreesmann)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 305/03

On 5 November 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6016. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6016. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

WATERPUR COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv09/RS-MD

WATER FILTERS DIRECT, LLC and

JAMES ARVIG,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

O R D E R

Before me is Defendants’ Notice of Settlement (Doc. 7). Pursuant to Local Rule

16.2(D), it is ordered:

1. This case is dismissed from the active docket of the court.

2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this Order, to

amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative

purposes, and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is directed to

close the case in its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on March 4, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 16, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30280

 

ROCK TUFARO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE ORLEANS

LEVEE DISTRICT; THADDEUS PETIT, Officer,

CRAIG ROBINSON, Officer,

Defendants.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Louisiana

(USDC No. 02-CV-435-I)

_______________________________________________________

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is affirmed and the court’s denial of leave to amend is

approved for reasons given by that court in its Order and Reasons of October 3, 2003.

AFFIRMED.