alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010206EN.01000201.xml

| 30.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 July 2010

2010/C 206/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3069 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4501 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83670 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4705 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3660 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9705 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,763 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 283,81 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0040 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2654 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9768 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4500 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3504 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1498 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7996 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7800 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 550,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5650 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8557 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2447 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 720,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1703 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,729 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,4514 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,144 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3042 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5578 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,8170 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3069

JPY

Japanese yen

113,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4501

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83670

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4705

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3660

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9705

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,763

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

283,81

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0040

RON

Romanian leu

4,2654

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9768

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4500

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3504

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1498

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7996

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7800

KRW

South Korean won

1 550,64

ZAR

South African rand

9,5650

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8557

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2447

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 720,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1703

PHP

Philippine peso

59,729

RUB

Russian rouble

39,4514

THB

Thai baht

42,144

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3042

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5578

INR

Indian rupee

60,8170

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50383 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. TAMMY DIANE RICHARDS Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:06-CR-185-ALL Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Tammy Diane Richards appeals her sentence following her guilty plea conviction for possessing stolen mail and forging an endorsement on a United States Treasury check. Because her plea agreement contained a waiver of appeal waiving her right to appeal her sentence on any ground, including any right conferred by 18 U.S.C. § 3742, and because the rearraignment transcript shows that her waiver of appeal was knowing and voluntary, her appeal is barred. See United States v. McKinney, 406 F.3d 744, 746-47 (5th Cir. 2005). AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 28, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 4:10cv289-RH/WCS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ROBERT FLOYD,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv289-RH/WCS

WALTER McNEIL et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 56, and the objections, ECF No. 57. I have reviewed 

de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 49, is 

GRANTED. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is dismissed 

with prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on January 4, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00289-RH-WCS Document 58 Filed 01/05/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The  undersigned, Jag Sandhu, President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Financial & Accounting Officer and a Director of Nava Resources, Inc. (the  “Company”), certify, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes  of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  of the Company for the Quarter ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   January 19, 2011

By: /s/ Jag Sandhu

Name:  Jag Sandhu  Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal  Financial & Accounting Officer) 

A  signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
# C_2011082EN.01000201.xml

| 16.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/2

---

Calls for proposals under the 2011 work programme ‘People’ of the Seventh EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

2011/C 82/02

Notice is hereby given of the launch of calls for proposals under the 2011 work programme ‘People’ of the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following calls. Calls deadline and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website.

‘People’ Specific Programme:

‘People’ Specific Programme:

| Call Title | Call Identifier |
| --- | --- |
| Intra-European Fellowships | FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IEF |
| International Incoming Fellowships | FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IIF |
| International Outgoing Fellowships | FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IOF |

Call Title

Call Identifier

Intra-European Fellowships

FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IEF

International Incoming Fellowships

FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IIF

International Outgoing Fellowships

FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IOF

These calls for proposals relate to the 2011 work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2010) 8947 of 14 December 2010.

Information on the modalities of the calls, the work programme, and the guide for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 230 (Friday, November 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 67743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5877]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel, ZRG RUS F 51 Nephrology Applications.
    Date: December 10-11, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ryan G. Morris, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4205, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-1501, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#600d0f1212091312200313124e0e09084e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="375a5845455e44457754444519595e5f19505841">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 19, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5877 Filed 11-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JAMES BERNARD CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11cv82/RS-GRJ

WARDEN ELLIS, et al,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6) and

Plaintiff’s Objection To Magistrate Judge Report And Recommendation (Doc. 9).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and is

incorporated in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(g).

3. All pending motions are denied as moot.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

 ORDERED on May 16, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00082-RS-GRJ Document 10 Filed 05/16/11 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:11-cv-00082-RS-GRJ Document 10 Filed 05/16/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011085EN.01000101.xml

| 18.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6121 — GEA Dutch Holding/CFS Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 85/01

On 11 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6121. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6121. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PANAMA CITY DIVISION 

HANCOCK BANK, a 

Mississippi banking corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 5:11-cv-00132-RS-EMT

JAMES A. BOYD, JR. and

CECELIA R. BOYD,

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT

I have previously granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Final Judgment 

(See Doc. 66). Final Judgment in favor of the Plaintiff is as follows:

1. Defendants, JAMES A. BOYD, JR., and CECILIA R. BOYD1are 

indebted, jointly and severally, to the Plaintiff, HANCOCK BANK, for the 

following sums:

i. PRINCIPAL $929,135.94

 

1Although Plaintiff inadvertently misspelled Mrs. Boyd's name in the Complaint and above-styled 

caption as "Cecelia," the loan documents attached to the Complaint were executed by Cecilia R. 

Boyd. Where there is a conflict between the allegations in the Complaint and the exhibits 

attached to the same, the latter control. See Crenshaw v. Lister, 556 F. 3d 1283, 1292 (11th Cir. 

2009). Accordingly, the inadvertent misspelling of Mrs. Boyd's name does not affect the validity 

of this Final Judgment because the subject promissory notes were executed by Cecilia R. Boyd 

who is properly before this Court.

Case 5:11-cv-00132-RS-EMT Document 70 Filed 11/14/11 Page 1 of 3
2

ii. INTEREST $34,455.46

iii. TOTAL AMOUNT OWED $963,591.40

2. Plaintiff, HANCOCK BANK, 2510 14th Street, Gulfport, 

Mississippi 35901, shall have a judgment in the amount of $963,591.40 against 

Defendants, JAMES A BOYD, JR. and CECILIA R. BOYD, whose last known 

address is 206 S. Harris Avenue Panama City, Florida, 32401, jointly and 

severally, FOR ALL OF WHICH LET EXECUTION ISSUE.

3. Plaintiff, HANCOCK BANK, shall be entitled to recover postjudgment interest at the legal rate established by 28 U.S.C. § 1961 from the date of 

the judgment until paid.

4. Plaintiff, HANCOCK BANK, shall be entitled to recover its 

reasonable attorney's fees and costs incurred in the prosecution of this action, 

pursuant to the terms and conditions of the subject loan documents attached to the 

Complaint. This Court retains jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of 

determining a reasonable amount of attorney's fees and costs to award to Plaintiff 

as the prevailing party in this action.

Case 5:11-cv-00132-RS-EMT Document 70 Filed 11/14/11 Page 2 of 3
3

ORDERED on November 14, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00132-RS-EMT Document 70 Filed 11/14/11 Page 3 of 3
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5263 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

40 Fulton Street in Middletown, New York, as the ‘‘Benjamin A. Gilman 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2018 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York (for himself and Mr. KING of New 

York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 40 Fulton Street in Middletown, New York, 

as the ‘‘Benjamin A. Gilman Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BENJAMIN A. GILMAN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 40 Fulton Street in Middletown, 

6 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ben7 jamin A. Gilman Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5263 IH

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Benjamin A. Gilman 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2011024EN.01002201.xml

| 26.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/22

---

Corrigendum to public holidays in 2011

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 12 of 15 January 2011
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 12 of 15 January 2011

2011/C 24/12

On page 10, ‘España’:

for:

‘21.4, 22.4, 25.4, 9.5, 2.6, 3.6, 13.6, 21.7, 1.11, 26.12, 27.12, 28.12, 29.12, 30.12’,

read:

‘1.1, 6.1, 21.4, 22.4, 25.7, 15.8, 12.10, 1.11, 6.12, 8.12’.

---
sppr8k_sept9letter.htm





 




Exhibit 10.1















 







 


September 10, 2014


 


Kelly Walters


President and Chief Executive Officer


Supertel Hospitality, Inc.


1800 West Pasewalk Avenue, Suite 200


Norfolk, Nebraska 68701


 


Dear Kelly,


 


The Board of Directors of Supertel Hospitality, Inc. appreciates your service as President and Chief Executive Officer of the company.  In connection with your resignation as President and Chief Executive Officer, we would like to offer you the following on behalf of the company:


 



	
·

	
You will remain on the company payroll through March 31, 2015 with present salary and benefits, paid in accordance with customary payroll practice.







 



	
·

	
You will no longer be an executive officer of the company following your resignation as President and Chief Executive Officer effective upon the earlier of (a) the hiring of a new executive officer of the company or (b) December 31, 2014.







 



	
·

	
Your Employment Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2012, between you and the company is no longer of force and effect and the company releases you and you release the company from any claims thereunder for the consideration provided herein.







 


We appreciate your offer to assist in the transition with the new chief executive officer.  If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please sign and date below and return a signed copy to me.


 


Supertel Hospitality, Inc.


 


/s/ James Friend


James Friend, Chairman of


the Board of Directors


 


Accepted and agreed this September 10, 2014


 


/s/ Kelly A. Walters


Kelly A. Walters
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DERREL THOMAS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-46-MP-GRJ

JORAM PEREZ, OFFICER BRADSHAW, 

and OFFICER BOCCACCIO,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion For Extension Of Time To

Answer or Otherwise Respond To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss. (Doc. 40.) Plaintiff

requests an extension of time until April 9, 2012 to file a response to the motion to

dismiss, filed by Defendants Bradshaw and Boccaccio. Plaintiff advises that he has

had difficulties using the law library and needs a Court order setting a deadline in order

to be given enough law library time to respond to the Defendants’ motion.

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion For Extension Of Time To Answer or Otherwise Respond

To Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss (Doc. 40) is GRANTED.

(2) Plaintiff shall respond to the motion to dismiss (Doc. 39) filed by

Defendants Boccaccio and Bradshaw on or before April 9, 2012.

 DONE AND ORDERED this 16 day of March, 2012. 

th 

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00046-MP-GRJ Document 41 Filed 03/16/12 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011119EN.01001201.xml

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/12

---

Revised Guidelines for the candidates in relation to the call for proposals for Associate Partners to the SESAR Joint Undertaking (SJU) (2011/C 76/08 of 10 March 2011)

2011/C 119/06

The revised Guidelines provide additional information on how the proposals will be evaluated against the award criteria listed under Section 3.3 of the Guidelines for candidates annexed to the Invitation to submit a proposal for Associate Partners of the SJU.

---
# C_2011212EN.01001802.xml

| 19.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/18

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6191 — Birla/Columbian Chemicals)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 212/07

On 15 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6191. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6191. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011040EN.01001202.xml

| 9.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6099 — Apax/Takko)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 40/07

On 1 February 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6099. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6099. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---