alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2511 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2511

 To amend title 40, United States Code, to provide the Marshal of the 
 Supreme Court of the United States and Supreme Court Police with the 
   authority to protect the Chief Justice of the United States, any 
 Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and other individuals in any 
                   location, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 19, 2019

Mr. Graham (for himself and Ms. Sinema) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 40, United States Code, to provide the Marshal of the 
 Supreme Court of the United States and Supreme Court Police with the 
   authority to protect the Chief Justice of the United States, any 
 Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and other individuals in any 
                   location, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT BUILDING AND GROUNDS POLICING 
              AUTHORITY.

    Section 6121 of title 40, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``any State'' and 
        inserting ``any location'';
            (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Authorization To Carry Firearms.--Duties under subsection 
(a)(2)(A) with respect to an official guest of the Supreme Court in any 
location (other than the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia) 
shall be authorized in writing by the Chief Justice or an Associate 
Justice, if those duties require the carrying of firearms under 
subsection (a)(4).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### BATTLE v. ELECTRIC CO.

No. 197 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 246.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1972.
WORKING IN COLD

Fire Fighter SCBA Best Practices
When Working in Cold

+ Follow SCBA manufacturers’ recommendations for breathing
air moisture content and compressor maintenance

+ Ensure SCBA breathing air systems receive routine maintenance
+ Keep SCBA connections dry when changing cylinders
+ Use care when removing SCBA after use to protect from cold and water

+ Onthe fireground, keep SCBA out of extreme cold temperatures when
notin use, store ina heated cab
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6739-6740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-635]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2) notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Comparative Biology Review.
    Date: March 15-16, 2007.
    Time: 7 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Radisson Governor's Inn, I-40 at Davis Drive, Exit 
280, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    Contact Person: Leroy Worth, PhD., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, Nat. Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30/Room 3171, Research Triangle 
Park, NC 27709, 919/541-0670, [email protected].
    Name of Committee: National Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel, Environmental Sensors for Personal 
Exposure Assessment.
    Date: March 22-23, 2007.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Radisson Governor's Inn, I-40 at Davis Drive, Exit 
280, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
    Contact Person: RoseAnne M. McGee, Associate Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research and Training, Nat. Institute of Environmental Health 
Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD EC-30, Research Triangle Park, NC 
27709, (919) 541-0752, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.115, 
Biometry and Risk Estimation--Health Risks from Environmental 
Exposures; 93.142, NIEHS Hazardous Waste Worker Health and Safety 
Training; 93.143, NIEHS Superfund Hazardous Substances--Basic 
Research and Education; 93.894, Resources and Manpower

[[Page 6740]]

Development in the Environmental Health Sciences; 93.113, Biological 
Response to Environmental Health Hazards; 93.114, Applied 
Toxicological Research and Testing, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: February 5, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-635 Filed 2-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HOWARD L. RICE,

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.:4:10-CV-203-SPM/WCS

GADSDEN COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to the Parties' Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (doc.

17) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), this matter is dismissed with

prejudice. However, pursuant to Northern District of Florida Local Rule 16.2,

this Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of sixty (60) days, during which time

any party may move to reopen this matter for good cause shown. 

DONE and ORDERED this twenty-fourth day of February, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 73858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6205]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center For Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Enabling 
Bioanalytical and Biophysical Technologies Study Section, January 31, 
2008, 8:30 a.m. to February 1, 2008, 6 p.m., Hotel Rouge, 1315 16th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20036 which was published in the Federal 
Register on December 13, 2007, 72 FR 70875-70877.
    The meeting will be held one day only: January 31, 2008, from 8:30 
a.m. to 6:30 p.m. The meeting location remains the same. The meeting is 
closed to the public.

    Dated: December 18, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-6205 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WILLIAM NORKUNAS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00064-MP -GRJ

THIRTY-NINTH AVENUE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 5, Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File

Answer. The motion is granted, and Defendant shall have until June 8, 2011, to respond to the

Complaint.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00064-MP-GRJ Document 8 Filed 05/09/11 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 250 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 250

  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 29, 2019

Mrs. Shaheen (for herself, Ms. Collins, Ms. Baldwin, Ms. Cortez Masto, 
 Ms. Duckworth, Ms. Harris, Mr. Markey, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Sanders, Mr. 
Whitehouse, Mr. Carper, Mrs. Gillibrand, and Ms. Hassan) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the exclusion of 
    individuals from service on a Federal jury on account of sexual 
                    orientation or gender identity.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Jury Access for Capable Citizens and 
Equality in Service Selection Act of 2019'' or the ``Jury ACCESS Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM FEDERAL JURIES ON ACCOUNT OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION 
              OR GENDER IDENTITY PROHIBITED.

    Section 1862 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``sexual orientation, gender identity,'' after ``sex,''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CECIL EUGENE BOYKIN, JR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-1-MP-GRJ

NURSE F/N/U MARSH and

SERGEANT F/N/U JERRELLS,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court on Doc. 37, Defendants’ Joint Motion to Compel

Discovery. Defendants request the Court to enter an order compelling Plaintiff to

respond to Defendant Jarrells’ interrogatories and request to produce. Additionally,

Defendants request the Court to order the Plaintiff to contact counsel immediately to

schedule Plaintiff’s deposition. Defendants have attempted in good faith to obtain

responses to the discovery requests and to obtain a date for Plaintiff’s deposition.

Despite these efforts the Plaintiff has failed to provide responses to the discovery

requests or contact counsel for Defendants to schedule his deposition. The discovery

deadline in this case is January 23, 2013. Plaintiff, therefore, must provide responses to

the discovery requests and coordinate his deposition in sufficient time for the discovery

to be completed by the discovery deadline. 

Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

1. Defendants’ Joint Motion to Compel Discovery (Doc. 37) is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff must provide answers to Defendant Jerrells’ interrogatories,
Page 2 of 2

responses to Defendant Jerrells’ request to produce, and produce all responsive

documents by December 28, 2012.

3. Plaintiff must contact counsel for Defendants by December 21, 2012 and

provide available dates for Plaintiff’s deposition. 

4. Plaintiff is advised that failure to respond to the requested discovery and

failure to schedule his deposition within the deadlines established in this order may be

grounds for the entry of sanctions, including but not limited to the dismissal of this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13 day of December 2012. th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:11-cv-1-MP -GRJ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting and briefing. 

# Date and Time:

Friday, January 11;  9:30 a.m. Meeting. 

# Place: 

U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, Washington, DC 20425. 

## Meeting Agenda 

I. Approval of Agenda. 

II. Approval of Minutes of December 3 Meeting. 

III. Announcements. 

IV. Staff Director's Report. 

V. Management and Operations:
      - Ethics Regulations.

VI. Program Planning:
      - FY 2009 Multi-state Report.

VII. State Advisory Committee Issues:
      - District of Columbia SAC.
      - Kansas SAC.
      Missouri SAC.      ( print page 449)    
      - South Carolina SAC.

VIII. Future Agenda Items. 

IX. Adjourn. 

# Contact Person for Further Information:

Robert Lerner, Press and Communications, (202) 376-8582. 

Dated: December 31, 2007. 

David Blackwood, 

General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 07-6310 Filed 12-31-07; 2:25 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
# C_2011193EN.01000201.xml

| 2.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

1,25 % on 1 July 2011

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 July 2011

2011/C 193/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4488 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4589 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90500 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1280 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2267 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7900 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,310 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9678 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2396 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3362 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3523 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3964 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2750 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7552 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7772 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 545,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8011 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3663 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3898 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 371,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3587 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,511 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3909 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,638 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2617 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9266 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,5950 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4488

JPY

Japanese yen

116,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4589

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90500

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1280

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2267

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7900

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,310

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9678

RON

Romanian leu

4,2396

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3362

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3523

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3964

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2750

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7552

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7772

KRW

South Korean won

1 545,06

ZAR

South African rand

9,8011

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3663

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3898

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 371,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3587

PHP

Philippine peso

62,511

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3909

THB

Thai baht

44,638

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2617

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9266

INR

Indian rupee

64,5950

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

        JOINT CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
            FINANCIAL OFFICER REQUIRED BY EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(B)

         In connection with the Annual Report of OmniCorder Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Denis A.
O'Connor, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Celia I. Schiffner,
Controller and Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003,
that:

         1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

March 31, 2005

                                     /s/ Denis A. O'Connor
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Denis A. O'Connor
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer


                                     /s/ Celia I. Schiffner
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Celia I. Schiffner
                                     Controller and Principal Accounting Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. Case No. 5:11cr23-MW/GRJ

 5:15cv66-MW/GRJ

RUFINO ROBELO-GALO.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 716, and has also reviewed de novo Petitioner’s 

objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 717. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Petitioner’s 

objections, as this Court’s opinion. This Court emphasizes that its predecessor 

specifically told Petitioner that neither his lawyer “nor the U.S. Attorney knows how 

I may interpret and apply the sentencing guidelines and the sentencing statutes in 

your case. So if my sentence turns out to be different than what your lawyer 

predicted, do you understand that you cannot take back your guilty plea?” ECF No. 

492 at 13. In short, this Court’s predecessor informed Petitioner that the sentencing 

judge was not bound by his lawyer’s prediction, if any. And, Petitioner 
acknowledged he understood. ECF No. 492 at 13. The Clerk shall enter judgment 

stating, “The Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct 

Sentence, ECF No. 597, is DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.” 

The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on March 22, 2018.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

United States District Judge
# C_2011153EN.01000601.xml

| 24.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6208 — Aeroports de Paris/JCDecaux Airport France/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 153/02

On 16 May 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6208. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6208. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TERRY L. ROBINSON,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 3:09cv563/MCR/EMT

WALTER A. McNEIL,

Respondent.

_________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May 26, 2010. (Doc. 15). Petitioner has been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Petitioner’s failure to comply

with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of June, 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RAY CHRIS MOBLEY,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-182/RS-GRJ

CORRECTIONS CORP. OF

AMERICA,

Defendant. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10). 

Plaintiff has not filed any objections. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order. 

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply 

with an order of the court and for failure to prosecute. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

ORDERED on December 20, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00182-RS-GRJ Document 11 Filed 12/20/11 Page 1 of 1