alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 7 (Thursday, January 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-71]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Third Generation Anthrax Vaccine.
    Date: January 11-12 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Double Tree Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: Brenda Lange-Gustafson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, NIAID, DEA, Scientific Review Program, Room 3122, 
6700-B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-
3684, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7012170503041116031f1e301e191119145e1e19185e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9dfffae8eee9fcfbeef2f3ddf3f4fcf4f9b3f3f4f5b3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research, 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 3, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-71 Filed 1-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2010357EN.01001701.xml

| 30.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/17

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 December 2010

2010/C 357/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3136 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 107,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4528 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85390 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9885 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2483 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8090 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,263 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 279,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7097 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9667 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2986 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0545 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2975 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3155 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2225 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7272 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7042 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 500,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,7855 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6976 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3848 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 822,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0518 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,601 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,9949 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,628 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2127 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,2676 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,1550 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3136

JPY

Japanese yen

107,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,4528

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85390

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9885

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2483

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8090

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,263

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

279,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7097

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9667

RON

Romanian leu

4,2986

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0545

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2975

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3155

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2225

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7272

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7042

KRW

South Korean won

1 500,57

ZAR

South African rand

8,7855

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6976

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3848

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 822,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0518

PHP

Philippine peso

57,601

RUB

Russian rouble

39,9949

THB

Thai baht

39,628

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2127

MXN

Mexican peso

16,2676

INR

Indian rupee

59,1550

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JUDY BAGGETT,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv447/MCR/EMT

CAROLYN W. COLVIN,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated March 25, 2014 (doc. 27). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No timely

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, the Court has determined that

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. The “Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees under the Social Security Act, 42

U.S.C. [§] 406(b)” (doc. 24) is GRANTED.

3. Plaintiff’s counsel, John M. Pennington, is awarded attorney’s fees in the

amount of $17,795.55, to be paid out of the sums withheld by the Commissioner from

Plaintiff’s past due benefits. 

4. Upon receipt of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), Plaintiff’s

counsel, John M. Pennington, shall immediately refund to Plaintiff any or all of the

Case 3:10-cv-00447-MCR-EMT Document 28 Filed 04/29/14 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

previously awarded EAJA fees that have not already been refunded to Plaintiff.

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of April, 2014.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cv447/MCR/EMT

Case 3:10-cv-00447-MCR-EMT Document 28 Filed 04/29/14 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING ANDFINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grant Hartford Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, Eric Sauve, President/Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
Dated: August 14, 2012

/s/Eric Sauve
EXHIBIT 3.5

                            CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                 VOICENET, INC.

     Voicenet, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

          DOES  HEREBY   CERTIFY:   that  a  Certificate  of  Amendment  to  the
Certificate of  Incorporation  was filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware
on September 16, 1996 and that said Certificate requires correction as permitted
by Sections 103(f) of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

          That  Article  FOURTH  of the that  Certificate  of  Amendment  to the
Certificate of  Incorporation  of the Corporation be amended by striking Article
FOURTH in its entirety and replacing therefor:

          "FOURTH:  The total  number of shares of stock  which the  Corporation
          shall have authority to issue is 11,000,000 of which  10,000,000 shall
          be shares of Common  Stock,  par value $.01 per share,  and  1,000,000
          shall be shares of  Preferred  Stock,  par value $.01 per  share.  The
          shares of Preferred Stock may be divided into such number of series as
          the  Board of  Directors  may  determine.  The Board of  Directors  is
          authorized to determine and alter the rights, preferences,  privileges
          and  restrictions  granted to and imposed upon the Preferred  Stock or
          any series  thereof  with  respect to any  wholly  unissued  series of
          Preferred Stock, and to fix the number of shares of any such series of
          Preferred  Stock.  The  Board of  Directors,  within  the  limits  and
          restrictions  stated in any  resolution or resolutions of the Board of
          Directors  originally  fixing  the number of shares  constituting  any
          series,  may increase or decrease  (but not below the number of shares
          of any series subsequent to the issue of shares of that series."


<PAGE>


          IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned sets his hand as of the 13th day
of April, 2001.



                                          VOICENET, INC.

                                          By: /s/ Alan Dawson
                                             ----------------------------------
                                          Name:    Alan Dawson
                                          Title:   Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 5:11cv206-RH/CJK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RAY CHRIS MOBLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv206-RH/CJK

STEVE MEADOWS et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 14. No objections have been filed. 

The recommendation is for dismissal of the case based on the plaintiff’s 

failure to comply with the magistrate judge’s order to provide updated financial 

information. The plaintiff did not comply with the order to provide updated 

financial information, did not respond to an order to show cause why the case 

should not be dismissed, and has not objected to the report and recommendation. 

For all that appears in this record, the plaintiff has lost interest in the case.

The plaintiff was a prisoner when he filed the case but has since been 

released. He was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis when he was a 

Case 5:11-cv-00206-RH-CJK Document 15 Filed 08/06/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:11cv206-RH/CJK

prisoner. The order to provide updated financial information would have allowed 

the court to determine whether the plaintiff should be allowed to continue to 

proceed in forma pauperis. 

The decision whether the plaintiff could continue to proceed in forma 

pauperis might ultimately have made little or no difference; it is unclear what 

additional costs might have accrued. But the order to provide updated financial 

information was permissible; a court may monitor the continuing appropriateness 

of in forma pauperis status. More importantly, the plaintiff was not free to 

disregard the order. As correctly noted in the report and recommendation, a court 

may dismiss an action based on a plaintiff’s continuing failure to abide by a court 

order. 

Prisoner plaintiffs often lose interest in prisoner litigation when they are 

released from custody. Perhaps that happened here. In any event, the plaintiff has 

failed to comply with repeated orders. Dismissal is appropriate.

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is DISMISSED 

without prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on August 6, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-00206-RH-CJK Document 15 Filed 08/06/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KERRY S. CREAMER, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv91-MP-GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated February 10, 2012. (Doc. 20). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 12) is GRANTED, the petition for a writ

of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice, and a certificate of

appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254

Cases.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of March, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00091-MP-GRJ Document 21 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Musician’s Exchange (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Van Ness, President and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/Daniel Van NessDaniel Van NessPresident andPrincipal Accounting OfficerAugust 13, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          48,680
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                        70
<INVENTORY>                                        151
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,445
<PP&E>                                          22,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,716
<BONDS>                                            516
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,000
<PREFERRED>                                          1<F1>
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                     155,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,754
<SALES>                                          4,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,944
<CGS>                                              821
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,245
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,767
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,236)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,003
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,003
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.11
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS PAR VALUE OF READING ENTERTAINMENT SERIES B PREFERRED STOCK
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### WILLIAM A. PRIVETTE v. HAROLD BRYON CLEMMONS and IDA M. CLEMMONS.

(Filed 1 December, 1965.)

Automobiles § 41a—

Evidence tending to show merely that plaintiff, while a passenger in.ja car, fell asleep, and that he awoke when the car ran onto the right-hand shoulder of the road at a straight and level place, went some 20 yards' and hit a ditch, causing the injuries in suit, *held*insufficient to overrule nonsuit.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Bickett, J.,*February 1965 Civil Session of Brunswick.

Action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff in an automobile accident. The accident occurred 6 September 1963 on North Carolina Highway 211, about 6 miles east of the town of Supply in Brunswick County. Plaintiff was a passenger in a car *728owned by defendant Ida M. Clemmons and operated by defendant Harold Bryon Clemmons.

Plaintiff’s evidence discloses these facts: Plaintiff was in South-port and asked male defendant for a ride to Supply. They left South-port about 8:00 P.M. Male defendant was driving and plaintiff was in the front seat on the right-hand side; they were the only occupants of the car. Plaintiff fell asleep en route and awoke when the car ran onto the right-hand shoulder of the road. The car “went about 20 to 25 yards, something like that before it ever hit the ditch. It went 23 steps after it hit the ditch.” Plaintiff’s right arm was broken and he was carried to a hospital. The weather was fair. The road was straight and level at the place of the accident; the hardsurface was 18.feet wide, and the shoulder 4 feet wide. The shoulder “had been raked up” and was soft. Before plaintiff fell asleep the car “was running along at moderate speed; around the speed limit” (55 miles per hour).

Plaintiff alleges he was injured by male defendant’s negligence, consisting of reckless driving, driving at a speed greater than was reasonable and prudent under the circumstances, failure to maintain a reasonable lookout, failure to keep the vehicle under proper control, failure to decrease speed, and failure to heed signs “warning of hazardous conditions.”

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the court allowed defendants’ motion for nonsuit.

*Hhollivan and Horne for plaintiff.*

*James, James & Crossley for defendants.*

PER Curiam.

The motion for nonsuit was properly allowed. The evidence utterly fails to support the specifications of negligence set out in the complaint. And there is no showing that the accident was caused by any negligence of defendants. See *Fuller v. Fuller,*253 N.C. 288, 116 S.E. 2d 776; *Ivey v. Rollins,*250 N.C. 89, 108 S.E. 2d 63.

Affirmed.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

GREGORY ROLAND,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00035-MP-GRJ

DAVID A GLANT,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 6, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, which recommends that this case be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2(B)(ii) because Plaintiff seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from

suit. Petitioner has not objected to the recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. 

Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 6, is ACCEPTED

and incorporated herein.

2. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, Doc. 4, is DISMISSED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00035-MP-GRJ Document 7 Filed 08/09/11 Page 1 of 1
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2475 

To modify the effective date for inclusion of certain members of the Armed 

Forces serving on active duty in the Yellow Ribbon G.I. Education 

Enhancement Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. COTTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To modify the effective date for inclusion of certain members 

of the Armed Forces serving on active duty in the Yellow 

Ribbon G.I. Education Enhancement Program, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2475 IS

1 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF EFFECTIVE DATE REGARD2 ING INCLUSION OF CERTAIN MEMBERS OF 

3 THE ARMED FORCES SERVING ON ACTIVE 

4 DUTY IN YELLOW RIBBON G.I. EDUCATION 

5 ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM. 

6 Section 104(b) of the Harry W. Colmery Veterans 

7 Educational Assistance Act of 2017 (Public Law 115–48) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘August 1, 2022’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘August 1, 2020’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
KEITH M. SHANKLIN

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FIL ED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3659

Opinion filed October 7 , 2016.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Keith M. Shanklin, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The pet ition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. See Baker

v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
**Exhibit 1.1.1**

 

Registration stamp by inspection # 7740 of the Russian ministry of taxes and collection on state registration # 2047740000130, of March 03,2004 

 

APPROVED 

by the Board of Directors of 

Open Joint-Stock Company 

Vimpel-Communications 

Protocol No. 4, dated February 18, 2004 

 

A.V. Izosimov, General Director 

 

SIGNATURE, SEAL 

 

**AMENDMENT No. 1**

**TO THE CHARTER OFOPEN JOINT-STOCK COMPANY**

**VIMPEL-COMMUNICATIONS**

 

1. Clause 5.3 of the Charter shall read as follows: 

 

The Company may create branches and open representative offices in the Russian Federation subject to compliance with requirements of the Russian Federation. Thecompany has branches in Abakan, Archangelsk, Astrakhan, Barnaul, Belgorod, Bryansk, Vladikavkaz, Vladimir, Volgograd, Vologda, Voronezh, Ivanovo, Ioshkar-Ola, Kazan, Kaluga, Kemerovo, Kostroma, Krasnodar, Krasnoyarsk, Kursk, Kyzyl, Lipetsk,Makhachkala, Murmansk, Nazran, Nalchik, Nizhni Novgorod, Novgorod, Novosibirsk, Norilsk, Omsk, Orel, Penza, Petrozavodsk, Pskov, Rostov-na-Donu, Ryazan, Samara, Saint-Petersburg, Saransk, Saratov, Smolensk, Stavropol, Tambov, Tver, Tomsk, Tula,Ulyanovsk, Ufa, Cheboksary, Cherkessk, Elista, Yaroslavl.