Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Notices 72441 

have either created baby registries 

through Graco, requested Graco’s 

newsletter, or whose names have been 

acquired from prenatal lists. Graco 

believes that providing the direct Graco 

online registration link will allow those 

consumers to register their Graco-brand 

seats once they have received the email. 

NHTSA Decision 

NHTSA regulations specify that child 

seat manufacturers must provide the 

telephone number for the Vehicle Safety 

Hotline so that consumers concerned 

about safety recalls or potential safetyrelated defects could contact the agency. 

That telephone number has been 

changed. A rule published on June 21, 

2005, in the Federal Register (70 FR 

35556) revised the relevant section of 

the regulations to state the new 

telephone number. The effective date for 

the new telephone number was June 21, 

2006; however, NHTSA issued an 

amendment on June 21, 2006 (71 FR 

35558) that changed the effective date of 

the new telephone number to September 

1, 2006. 

Although the Hotline number printed 

on the labels is not the correct number, 

Graco proposed to redirect calls made to 

the incorrect Hotline number to the 

current Hotline number for a period of 

7 years. Since filing its petition, Graco 

has in fact redirected those calls so that 

anyone who calls the incorrect number 

is automatically connected to NHTSA’s 

Hotline. NHTSA has confirmed that this 

change has been activated. Also, 

NHTSA has initiated appropriate 

measures to reacquire the incorrect 

Hotline number from Graco. Once 

NHTSA has re-acquired the rights to the 

old number, calls to that number will 

continue to be routed directly to the 

new Hotline. NHTSA therefore agrees 

with Graco that there is no adverse 

safety consequence from this aspect of 

the noncompliance because consumers 

who call the incorrect Hotline number 

will automatically be redirected to the 

current Hotline number. 

Although the Graco models at issue 

do not have labels containing Graco’s 

electronic registration Web site address, 

that address is shown on the registration 

cards that come with each new child 

restraint system. Those who purchase 

the seat are, therefore, immediately 

presented with the online registration 

option and the necessary Web site 

address where they are most likely to 

look for it, i.e., on the product 

registration card. The additional 

requirement that the Web site address 

also be on the seat label provides 

helpful information to owners who have 

not already registered by using the 

registration card or the online option, 

and may be particularly helpful for 

subsequent owners who have not 

received the registration card. However, 

even without the Web site information, 

the noncompliant label provides the 

important information that registration 

is essential to being notified of a recall, 

explains what information needs to be 

submitted for registration, and provides 

Graco’s mailing address and telephone 

number for that purpose. Therefore, any 

owner who reads the label will be 

informed of the importance of 

registration and provided with two 

methods for accomplishing registration. 

Also, Graco’s company Web site address 

appears in every owner’s manual, so a 

person intent on registering the seat 

online could readily determine how to 

do so. 

The only risk created by the 

noncompliance is that someone who 

wished to register the seat online but 

either ignored the online registration 

information on the registration card, or 

never had the card, would choose not to 

register the seat despite the ability to do 

so by mail, telephone, or by locating the 

Web site information in the owner’s 

manual or through a simple online 

search. We think the likelihood is far 

greater that a person interested in 

registering the seat would use one of the 

available options. Although provision of 

information for registration of child 

seats is very important and inclusion of 

the Web site address on the label is one 

way of making registration easier, we 

think the risk created by this particular 

noncompliance is very slight and 

inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. 

In consideration of the foregoing, 

NHTSA has decided that Graco has met 

its burden of persuasion that the 

labeling noncompliances described are 

inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. 

Accordingly, Graco’s petition is granted 

and the petitioner is exempted from the 

obligation of providing notification of, 

and a remedy for, the noncompliances 

under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120. 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120; 

delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 

501.8. 

Issued on: December 13, 2007. 

Daniel C. Smith, 

Associate Administrator for Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. E7–24702 Filed 12–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials 

Safety Administration 

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; 

Notice of Delays in Processing of 

Special Permits Applications 

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous 

Materials Safety Administration 

(PHMSA), DOT. 

ACTION: List of Applications Delayed 

more than 180 days. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c), 

PHMSA is publishing the following list 

of special permit applications that have 

been in process for 180 days or more. 

The reason(s) for delay and the expected 

completion date for action on each 

application is provided in association 

with each identified application. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Delmer F. Billings, Director, Office of 

Hazardous Materials Special Permits 

and Approvals, Pipleine and Hazardous 

Materials Safety Administration, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, East 

Building, PHH–30, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue Southeast, Washington, DC 

20590–0001, (202) 366–4535. 

Key to ‘‘Reason for Delay’’. 

1. Awaiting additional information 

from applicant. 

2. Extensive public comment under 

review. 

3. Application is technically complex 

and is of significant impact or 

precedent-setting and requires extensive 

analysis. 

4. Staff review delayed by other 

priority issues or volume of special 

permit applications. 

Meaning of Application Number 

Suffixes. 

N—New application. 

M—Modification request. 

PM—Party to application with 

modification request. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 

14, 2007. 

Delmer F. Billings, 

Director, Office of Hazardous Materials, 

Special Permits and Approvals. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
72442 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 244 / Thursday, December 20, 2007 / Notices 

Application No. Applicant Reason for 

delay 

Estimated date of 

completion 

Modification to Special Permits 

11579–M ........... Austin Powder Company, Cleveland, OH .......................................................................... 3, 4 12–31–2007 

New Special Permit Applications 

14385–N ........... Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Kansas City, MO ............................................. 4 12–31–2007 

14402–N ........... Lincoln Composites, Lincoln, NE ........................................................................................ 1 12–31–2007 

14436–N ........... BNSF Railway Company, Topeka, KS ............................................................................... 4 12–31–2007 

14500–N ........... Northwest Respiratory Services, St. Paul, MN .................................................................. 4 12–31–2007 

14507–N ........... Gulf Coast Hydrostatic Testers, LLC, Denham Springs, LA .............................................. 4 12–31–2007 

14508–N ........... Gulf Coast Hydrostatic Testers, LLC, Denham Springs, LA .............................................. 4 12–31–2007 

[FR Doc. 07–6127 Filed 12–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–60–M 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request 

AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency (OCC), Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The OCC, as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent burden, invites the 

general public and other Federal 

agencies to comment on a proposed 

information collection, as required by 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, 

and a respondent is not required to 

respond to, an information collection 

unless it displays a currently valid 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) control number. The OCC is 

soliciting comments concerning an 

information collection titled ‘‘Bank 

Secrecy Act/Money Laundering Risk 

Assessment’’ (MLR). The OCC is also 

giving notice that it has sent the 

information collection to OMB for 

review. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted by 

January 22, 2008. 

ADDRESSES: Communications Division, 

Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency, Public Information Room, 

Mailstop 1–5, Attention: 1557–0231, 

250 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20219. In addition, comments may be 

sent by fax to (202) 874–4448, or by 

electronic mail to 

regs.comments@occ.treas.gov. You may 

personally inspect and photocopy 

comments at the OCC’s Public 

Information Room, 250 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC. For security reasons, 

the OCC requires that visitors make an 

appointment to inspect comments. You 

may do so by calling (202) 874–5043. 

Upon arrival, visitors will be required to 

present valid government-issued photo 

identification and submit to security 

screening in order to inspect and 

photocopy comments. 

Additionally, you should send a copy 

of your comments to OMB Desk Officer, 

1557–0231, by mail to U.S. Office of 

Management and Budget, 725 17th St., 

NW., #10235, or by fax to (202) 395–

6974. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: You 

can request additional information or a 

copy of the collection and supporting 

documentation submitted to OMB by 

contacting: Mary Gottlieb, (202) 874–

5090, Legislative and Regulatory 

Activities Division, Office of the 

Comptroller of the Currency, 250 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20219. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OCC 

is proposing to extend the approval for 

the following information collection: 

Title: Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money 

Laundering Risk Assessment. 

OMB Number: 1557–0231. 

Affected Public: Businesses or other 

for-profit. 

Type of Review: Regular review. 

Abstract: The MLR enhances the 

ability of examiners and bank 

management to identify and evaluate 

any Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money 

Laundering risks associated with the 

banks’ products, services, customers, 

and locations. As new products and 

services are introduced, existing 

products and services change, and the 

banks expand through mergers and 

acquisitions, management’s evaluation 

of money laundering and terrorist 

financing risks must evolve as well. 

Absent appropriate controls, such as 

this risk assessment, these lines of 

business, products, or entities could 

elevate Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money 

Laundering risks. The information 

collection only includes community 

banks. 

Burden Estimates: 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

1,670. 

Estimated Number of Responses: 

1,670. 

Frequency of Response: Annually. 

Estimated Annual Burden: 10,020 

hours. 

Comments: The OCC requested 

comments on the renewal of the 

information collection (72 FR 44920, 

August 9, 2007). Two comments were 

received. Comments continue to be 

invited on: 

(a) Whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information has practical utility; 

(b) The accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the collection 

of information; 

(c) Ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; 

(d) Ways to minimize the burden of 

the collection on respondents, including 

through the use of automated collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology; and 

(e) Estimates of capital or startup costs 

and costs of operation, maintenance, 

and purchase of services to provide 

information. 

Dated: December 14, 2007. 

Stuart Feldstein, 

Assistant Director, Legislative and Regulatory 

Activities Division, Office of the Comptroller 

of the Currency. 

[FR Doc. E7–24722 Filed 12–19–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Thrift Supervision 

[Docket ID OTS–2007–0009] 

Savings and Loan Holding Company 

Rating System 

AGENCY: Office of Thrift Supervision, 

Treasury. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES