alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

TIMOTHY WILLSON and KIMBERLY WILLSON

, Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 552

[ November 22, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County ; Cynthia L. Cox , Judge; L.T. Case No.

312013CA001615

.

Bruce Botsford of Bruce Botsford, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Adam Topel of Liebler Gonzalez & Portuondo, Miami, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, M AY and K L INGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

Northern District of Florida

TIMOTHY LUICK

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

MAD CONTRACTING LLC., and EMERGENCY
RESPONSE GROUP, LLC.

wees

Defendant

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant's name and address) M AD CONTRACTING LLC.
C/O: ATHENA PETRIELLO, Resident Agent
10 4TH ST
BRANCHVILLE, NJ 07826

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney,
whose name and address are: Carlos V. Leach, Esquire

Morgan & Morgan, P.A.

20 N. Orange Ave., 14th Floor
P.O. Box 4979

Orlando, FL 32802-4979

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk


AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 ())

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date)

C1 I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) 5 or

CO I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

O I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) 5 or

C1 [returned the summons unexecuted because 5 or
1 Other (specify):
My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ 0.00

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server's signature

Printed name and title

Server's address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 1 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 2 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 3 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 4 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 5 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 6 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 7 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 8 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 9 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 10 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 11 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 12 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 13 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 14 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 15 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 16 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 17 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 18 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 19 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 20 of 21
Case 3:11-cv-00140-MCR-CJK Document 1-1 Filed 03/23/11 Page 21 of 21
# C_2011187EN.01001002.xml

| 28.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6195 — Holcim/Basalt/H + B Grondstoffen JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 187/04

On 6 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6195. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6195. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### The People *of*the State of New York ex rel. Postal Telegraph-Cable Company, Appellant, *v.*State Board of Tax Commissioners, Respondent. City of New York, Intervenor, Respondent.

(Submitted September 30, 1918;

decided October 8, 1918.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 224 N. Y. 167.) •
<PAGE> 1


            Report of Independent Public Accountants


To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated financial statements of Household
Finance Corporation (the "Company") and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1999 and have issued our report thereon dated
January 14, 2000.  We have not audited any financial statements
of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to
December 31, 1999, or performed any audit procedures subsequent
to the date of our report on those statements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that
caused us to believe that the Company was not in compliance with
any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or conditions of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated November
1, 1996, in conjunction with the Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset
Backed Certificates Series 1996-2 insofar as they relate to
accounting matters.  It should be noted, however, that our audit
was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such
noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of the
Company's system of internal accounting controls over the
Company's home equity loan portfolio, including those loans
serviced under the Agreement to the extent we considered
necessary to evaluate the system as required by generally
accepted auditing standards.  In accordance with these standards,
the purpose of our study and evaluation, which included obtaining
an understanding of the accounting systems, was to determine the
nature, timing and extent of the auditing procedures necessary
for expressing an opinion on the financial statements.  Our study
and evaluation also took into consideration certain of the
criteria and audit requirements in the Audit Guide for Audits of
Non-Supervised Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing
and Urban Development.  However, certain procedures included in
the audit guide are not applicable to the home equity loans being
serviced for the Trustee, and therefore, were not performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records relating
to home equity loans serviced for the Trustee that, in our
opinion, Section 3.10 of the Agreement required us to report.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the
Board of Directors and management of the Company and should not
be used for any other purpose.


Chicago, Illinois
January 14, 2000
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION 

BRICE BUILDING CO., INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 5-10-mc-4/RS-EMT 

WILLIAM DEL LEE, an individual, 

and TALMEDGE E. LEE, an individual, 

Defendants, 

and 

LANDMARK GENERAL CONTRACTORS, 

INC.

Garnishee. 

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are Defendant Talmadge E. Lee’s Notices of Filing (Docs. 34, 35, 36 

and 48) and Plaintiff’s Affidavits in Opposition (Doc. 40, 41, 42 and 49). 

While Defendant’s Notices comply with FLA. STAT. § 77.041, they are in effect a 

motion. As such, consideration is deferred until the parties comply with Fla. N.D. Loc. 

R. 7.1. Defendant shall file a memorandum not later than February 9, 2011, and Plaintiff 

shall file a response not later than February 18, 2011. 
ORDERED on January 31, 2011

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5349 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5349

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2018

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1325 Autumn Avenue in Memphis, Tennessee, as the ``Judge Russell B. 
                    Sugarmon Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDGE RUSSELL B. SUGARMON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1325 Autumn Avenue in Memphis, Tennessee, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Judge Russell B. Sugarmon Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Judge 
Russell B. Sugarmon Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 8.1

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF HARMONY GOLD MINING COMPANY LIMITED



|                                                                     |  |                |     |   |                         |             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------- | --- | - | ----------------------- | ------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                                   |  | PERCENTAGEHELD |     |   | COUNTRY OFINCORPORATION
|                                                                     |  |               
|ARMGold/Harmony Freegold Joint Venture Company (Proprietary) Limited |  |                | 100 | % |                         | South Africa
|                                                                     |  |               
|Avgold Limited                                                       |  |                | 100 | % |                         | South Africa
|                                                                     |  |               
|Evander Gold Mines Limited(1)                                        |  |                | 100 | % |                         | South Africa
|                                                                     |  |               
|Harmony Gold Australia (Proprietary) Limited                         |  |                | 100 | % |                         | Australia   
|                                                                     |  |               
|Kalahari Goldridge Mining Company Limited                            |  |                | 100 | % |                         | South Africa
|                                                                     |  |               
|Randfontein Estates Limited                                          |  |                | 100 | % |                         | South Africa



|(1) | An agreement in principle to sell Evander Gold Mines Limited was signed on May 30, 2012.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2010352EN.01001401.xml

| 23.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/14

---

Call for applications under the work programme of the Eurostars Joint Programme

2010/C 352/13

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for applications under the work programme of the Eurostars Joint Programme.

Eurostars Joint Programme

Applications are invited for the following call: Eurostars-2011-CO6

Call documentation, including deadline, is published on the following website:

http://www.eurostars-eureka.eu/

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 6809]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-616]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Genomic Medicine Program Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Genomic Medicine 
Program Advisory Committee will meet on March 16, 2007 in room 230, 
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, 
DC. The meeting will convene at 8 a.m. and adjourn at 5:30 p.m. The 
meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Committee is to provide advice and make 
recommendations to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on using genetic 
information to optimize medical care of veterans and to enhance 
development of tests and treatments for diseases particularly relevant 
to veterans.
    The Committee will receive an overview of the VA health care system 
and electronic medical record, and will be asked to provide insight 
into optimal ways for VA to incorporate genomic information into its 
health care program while applying appropriate ethical oversight and 
protecting the privacy of veterans.
    Members of the public may provide up to 5-minute statements during 
the period reserved for public comments. They may also submit, at the 
time of the meeting, a 1-2 page summary of their comments for inclusion 
in the official meeting record. Any member of the public seeking 
additional information should contact Dr. Timothy O'Leary at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cdb9a4a0a2b9a5b4e3a2a1a8acbfb48dbbace3aaa2bb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afdbc6c2c0dbc7d681c0c3caceddd6efd9ce81c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: February 5, 2007.

    By direction of the Secretary:
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-616 Filed 2-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE v. DAMERON

No. 172 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 84.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1972. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question 31 August 1972.
# EUR-Lex - - EN

*|*

#

**Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6301 — Eurazeo/Moncler) — Candidate case for simplified procedure Text with EEA relevance **

*
Official Journal C 243 , 20/08/2011 P. 0020 - 0020 *

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.6301 — Eurazeo/Moncler)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 243/10

1. On 12 August 2011, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 and following a referral pursuant to Article 4(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] by which the undertaking Eurazeo SA ("Eurazeo", France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Moncler SpA ("Moncler", Italy) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for undertaking Eurazeo: investment company active in a wide range of sectors including car rental, management of car-parking, real-estate investment and rental/cleaning of textiles,

- for undertaking Moncler: design, creation, marketing and distribution of high-end clothing and accessories.

3. On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation [2] it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4. The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6301 — Eurazeo/Moncler, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "EC Merger Regulation").

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 ("Notice on a simplified procedure").

--------------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

AAHTRELL R JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00225-MP -GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPT. OF

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 9, Respondent’s first motion for an

extension of time to respond to the Petition. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

1. That the motion, Doc. 9, is GRANTED. Respondent shall respond to the

Petition on or before April 15, 2011.

2. Petitioner shall have until May 16, 2011, to file a reply, if any.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16 day of March 2011. 

th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

COURTNEY ANTONIO BURGESS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-79-RS-CJK

PAIGE AUGUSTINE,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21). 

No objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. 

3. The Habeas Petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on July 31, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00079-RS-CJK Document 22 Filed 07/31/12 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1688206
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          683913
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                   41090151
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         6406467
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           6367598
<LOANS>                                       59795998
<ALLOWANCE>                                     226215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               114526768
<DEPOSITS>                                    71353098
<SHORT-TERM>                                   4800000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1026606
<LONG-TERM>                                    4591847
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         25921
<OTHER-SE>                                    32729296
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               114526768
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                4369032
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              3017961
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                204608
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               7591601
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2883864
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3207679
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          4383922
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    17615
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                3223371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2073203
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     2073203
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1265129
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.14
<LOANS-NON>                                      14000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  24000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                220000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    11400
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               226215
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            226215
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>