alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 10, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. § 4301,                     *et seq.*                     (“the Act”), VSI Alliance has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, UMC, Hsinchu City, TAIWAN; and Intel, Santa Clara, CA have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and VSI Alliance intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 29, 1996, VSI Alliance filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section                           ( print page 72390)                        6(b) of the Act on March 4, 1997 (62 FR 9812).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 30, 2007. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 7, 2007 (72 FR 62870).                

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-6123 Filed 12-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
RESIGNATION LETTER


 


   September 5, 2014


 


To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of


     Z Holdings Group, Inc.


 


 Gentlemen:


 


This letter serves as notice that as of
the date hereof, I hereby resign from my position as President, Director, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Executive Officer,
 Secretary, and Treasurer   of      Z Holdings, Group, Inc. (the “Corporation”). My resignation
is not the result of any disagreement with the Corporation on any matter relating to its operation, policies (including
accounting or financial policies) or practices. Such resignation is
to be effective ten days after the filing and mailing of an Information Statement required by Rule 14f-1 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


 


Sincerely,


 /s/
Scot Scheer


Scot Scheer
# C_2011123EN.01000101.xml

| 21.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6182 — MAN/MAN camions et bus/MAN Truck & Bus Belgium)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 123/01

On 15 April 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6182. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6182. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### UTILITIES COMM. v. SIMPSON

No. 110 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 543.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 13 June 1977.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 35 (Thursday, February 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Blue Ribbon Panel on VA Medical School Affiliations; Notice of 
Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Blue Ribbon Panel 
on VA-Medical School Affiliations has scheduled a meeting for March 27, 
2007, in Room 542 at 1800 G Street NW., Washington, DC. The meeting 
will begin at 8:30 a.m. and will end at 3 p.m. The meeting is open to 
the public.
    The purpose of the Panel is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs, through the Under Secretary for Health, in issues related to a 
comprehensive philosophical framework to enhance VA's partnerships with 
medical schools and affiliated institutions.
    The panelists will review VA's current affiliations with medical 
schools and establish the future directions of the Panel. The Panel 
will receive background presentations and issue papers on various 
topics that are relevant to the Panel's deliberations.
    Interested persons may attend and present oral statements to the 
Panel. Oral presentations will be limited to five minutes or less, 
depending on the number of participants. Interested parties may also 
provide written comments for review by the Panel prior to the meeting 
or at any time, by e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e0a78c8f928981cea88f8c8c818e84a09681ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="77301b18051e16593f181b1b16191337011659101801">[email protected]</span></a> or by mail to Gloria 
J. Holland, PhD Special Assistant for Policy and Planning to the Chief 
Academic Affiliations Officer, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., (14), 
Washington, DC 20420.

    Dated: February 15, 2007.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-785 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mordechai Guttman, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Mordechai Guttman Mordechai Guttman Title: President and Chief Financial Officer   May 19, 2009
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CHRISTOPHER M. WARNER, and PATRICIA ANN MURRAY, Individually and on behalf of their Marital Community, Appellants,

v. SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES d/b/a/ SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER/FIRST HILL and SWEDISH ORTHOPEDIC INSTITUTE, Respondents, and PROLIANCE SURGEONS, INC., P.S., d/b/a ORTHOPEDIC PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES; ALEXIS FALICOV, M.D., Ph.D.; and JUSTIN L ESTERBERG, M.D., Defendants. NO. 73118-1-1

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: February 1,2016 -T(



### Lau, J. — In this corporate negligence case, ChristopherWarner sued Swedish Health Services claiming personal injuries related to its alleged failure to establish a neuromonitoring credentialing process and related policies and procedures governing 

### remote neuromonitoring at the time of his spinal surgery. The trial court dismissed the 

### corporate negligence claim on Swedish's summaryjudgmentmotion, reasoning that his medical experts failed to establish the applicable standard ofcare.No. 73118-1-1/2 

### This court reviews summaryjudgmentorders de novo, considering the evidence 

### and allreasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party—in this case Warner. Keck v. Collins. 184 Wn.2d 358, 370, 357 P.3d 1080 

### (2015). Summaryjudgment is appropriate only when no genuine issue exists as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled tojudgmentas a matterof law. CR 56(c); Keck. 184Wn.2d at 370. An issue of material fact is genuine ifthe evidence is sufficient 

### for a reasonablejury to return a verdict for the nonmoving party. Keck. 184Wn.2d at 370. Atoral argument before this court, Swedish properly conceded that Warner's expertwitness declarations and deposition testimony from Dr. Ney and Dr. Tarlov were 

### sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact.1 We agree. Our review ofthe record shows Warner submitted sufficient expert witness evidence to overcome summaryjudgment. We reverse the trial court's order granting summaryjudgmentof dismissal and remand for proceedings consistentwith this opinion.

WE CONCUR: 

# iWh
^ ^f^ 1At oral argument, Swedish stated that Keck v. Collins, "eroded and in fact lowered the threshold such that Mr. Warner's expert declarations would probably pass 

### muster on the summaryjudgment standard when viewed inthe lightmostfavorable to Mr. Warner." Wash. Court ofAppeals oral argument, Warner v. Swedish Health 

### Services, etal.. No. 73118-1-1 (Jan. 7, 2016), at 10 min., 1 sec. (on file withcourt).

-2-
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of National Holdings Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Alan B. Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Alan
B.
Levin


Alan B.
Levin


Chief
Financial Officer


December
29, 2009
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PERRY GENE VANDERFORD,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv74/RV/EMT

R. TIFFT, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May 2, 2011 (Doc. 7). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed

objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00074-RV-EMT Document 8 Filed 08/18/11 Page 1 of 1
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

133427 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MICHAEL ROBERT SCHILS,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133427 

 COA: 274231 

Washtenaw CC: 05-000966-CZ 

WASHTENAW COUNTY,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0917 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 24, 2007 

 Clerk
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:01CR66/RV

KENNETH COLLINS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Vinson on 1/12/2009 

Type of Motion/Pleading MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE PUSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 

3582(c)(2)

Filed by: Defendant on 12/15/08 Doc. No. 161

( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading

RESPONSES:

on Doc. No.

on Doc. No.

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

/s/ J. Marbut

Deputy Clerk

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 13th day of

 January , 2009, that:

(a) The requested relief is DENIED.

(b) Amendment 706 has no effect upon the defendant’s sentencing 

guideline range.

/s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:01-cr-00066-RV Document 162 Filed 01/13/09 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BILLY GAINOUS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-120/RS-GRJ

JOE NUGENT, in his official capacity

As SHERIFF, GULF COUNTY, FLORIDA,

CITY OF PORT ST. JOE, FLORIDA, and

KEN STARNES, individually,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Defendant City of Port St. Joe’s Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment (Doc. 35) and Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 45). The Motion is 

DENIED. The parties agree that Plaintiff may not recover damages for any arrests that 

occurred prior to April 27, 2007. Any reference to those arrests will not be considered 

by the trier of fact. In addition, the March 17, 2008, arrest is adequately pled. (See Doc. 

1, ¶34). Finally, Plaintiff has cleared up the misunderstanding about Count VII. It arises 

under Section 1983. 

ORDERED on September 20, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00120-RS-GRJ Document 46 Filed 09/20/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011240EN.01000201.xml

| 18.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6324 — Bain Capital/Hellman & Friedman/Securitas Direct)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 240/03

On 10 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6324. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6324. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RAY CHRIS MOBLEY,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:11cv148/RV/EMT

WALTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated January 11, 2012 (doc. 24). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or

failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of February, 2012.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00148-RV-EMT Document 25 Filed 02/10/12 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We have issued our reports dated March 8, 2006,accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of EFJ, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of EFJ, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form S-3 (File No. 333-125257, effective May 26, 2005) andForms S-8 (File No. 333-129717, effective November 15, 2005, File No. 333-48834, effective October 27, 2000; File No. 333-48836, effective October 27, 2000; File No. 333-48840 effective October 27, 2000; FileNo. 333-48880, effective October 27, 2000; File No. 333-30673, effective July 2, 1997). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Vienna, Virginia 

March 8, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Daniel L.
Scharre, the Chief Executive Officer of Larscom Incorporated (the "Company"),
and Donald W. Morgan, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify
that, to the best of their knowledge:

         1.       The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
(the "Annual Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         2.       The information contained in the Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of
the 29th day of March, 2004.

                                                /s/ Daniel L. Scharre
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Daniel L. Scharre
                                                Chief Executive Officer

                                                /s/ Donald W. Morgan
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Donald W. Morgan
                                                Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1
**Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-122400) and Form S-8(File Nos. 333-132620, 333-61325 and 333-137200) of Media Sciences International, Inc. ofour report dated August 14, 2006, on our audits of the consolidated financial statementsof Media Sciences International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the years ended June30, 2006 and 2005, which report appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. 

                                                                                                                /s/ J.H. Cohn LLP 

Roseland, New JerseySeptember 25, 2006