alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Consent of Independent Chartered Accountants




The Board of Directors
PowerTrader, Inc.


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 (File No.  333-50629) of PowerTrader  Inc. of our report dated December
1, 1999 relating to the  consolidated  balance sheet as at June 30, 1999 and the
related consolidated statements of loss, cash flows and changes in shareholders'
equity  (deficit)  for the year then ended which report  appears in the June 30,
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of PowerTrader Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Accountants

Toronto, Canada
March 21, 2000
[No. 932.]

#### THE STATE OF NEVADA, Appellant, *v.*D. H. HASKELL et al., Respondents.

Quo Warranto — Toll Road Franchise — Abandonment—Burden boe Proof. — When the pleadings admit that the parties owning a toll-road franchise have a good title, and the proceeding to have the franchise forfeited is based solely upon a claim of abandonment or forfeiture, the affirmative of the issue and the burden of proof is on the State.

Appeal from the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Esmeralda county.

The facts appear in the opinion.

*11. A. Murphy and Wells & Steiuari,*for Appellant.

When an information in the nature of *quo warranto*is filed against a party, the *onus*of proof is upon him, not upon the informant. (Angel *&*Ames on Corp., 784, 749, 751, 756; 15 Johnson, 358.)

*Robert M. Clarke and*JV. *Soederberg,*for Respondent.

The judgment of the lower court is right. The burden of proof was upon the state to establish the forfeiture alleged in the complaint, not upon defendants to prove a negative. (C. L. Nev. 392-394; *State*v. *Broion,*34 Miss. 688; 2 Doug. Mich. 359; High’s Ex. L. Rem. 720, 725.)

By the Court,

Beatty, C. J.:

This is a proceeding by information in the nature of a *quo warranto*instituted by the district attorney of Es*210meralda county for the purpose of having a toll-road franchise declared forfeited.

The complaint alleges the grant of the franchise iu 1862 and its acceptance and enjoyment until 1869, at which time it is charged the defendants abandoned the road and ceased for a period of eight or nine years to keep it in repair. The answer denies the alleged abandonment, and denies that there was any neglect to repair sufficient to work a forfeiture.

When tho case was called for trial the district attorney declined to offer any testimony, and judgment was thereupon entered in favor of the defendants. From the judgment so entered the state appeals. Only one question is involved in the ease, and that is as to the burden of proof under the pleadings.

The general rule in cases of this character is that the person claiming the franchise must plead and prove a good title thereto, and that the state is bound to prove nothing; but when, as in this case, it is admitted that tho defendant has had a good title, and the only ground of tho proceeding is a claim, of abandonment or forfeiture, the affirmative of the issue and tho burden of proof is on tho state.

Proceedings upon *quo loarraiüo*and information in tho nature thereof are regulated by statute in this state (C. L., secs. 389 to 415), and it is therein provided (sec. 394) that the issues are to bo tried as iu other civil cases. This being so, it follows that the state, like any other party relying on a forfeiture or an abandonment, must prove its case.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of National Holdings Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Alan B. Levin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







/s/ Alan B.
Levin


Alan B. Levin


Chief Financial Officer


December 29, 2008
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DAVID RHODEN, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 1:11-cv-26-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion For Second Extension Of Time To

File Memorandum Of Law. (Doc. 17.) Plaintiff requests an extension of time until July

21, 2011 to file his memorandum. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(B), Plaintiff’s counsel

certifies that Defendant’s counsel has been contacted and that Defendant does not

object to the requested relief. 

Accordingly, upon due consideration, Plaintiff’s Motion For Second Extension Of

Time To File Memorandum Of Law (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his

memorandum on or before July 21, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21 day of July, 2011. st

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00026-MP-GRJ Document 18 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Research Demonstration and Dissemination Projects (R18).                    

*Date:*                         March 6, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Patricia A. Haggerty, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7194, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0288,                         *haggertp@nhibi.nih.gob.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 9, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-761 Filed 2-20-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-07-M
United States District Court

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Time: 12:00 - 12:44 p.m. Case # 4:11cv107-RH 

Date March 22, 2012 

JAMES W DAVIS v. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE

DOCKET ENTRY: TELEPHONIC SUMMARY JUDGMENT HEARING held. Parties argue Motion for

Summary Judgment. Ruling by Court: Summary Judgment is DENIED. The trial will be held on the week

beginning April 23 or April 30 . Jury selection will remain on April 2 . An order is forthcoming.

rd th nd

 

PRESENT: HONORABLE ROBERT L. HINKLE, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE 

 Elizabeth Lawrence 

 Deputy Clerk Judy Nolton Court Reporter

 

ATTORNEYS APPEARING FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEY APPEARING FOR DEFENDANT:

Marie Mattox Jeffrey Howell

Erika Goodman

Initials of the Clerk: ERL

Case 4:11-cv-00107-RH-CAS Document 59 Filed 03/22/12 Page 1 of 1
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 14 0- CV WEEKS MARINE, INC. , Appellant
v . L aura G ON Z AL ES , Appellee Fr om the 229th J udicial District Court, Starr County , Texas

Trial Court No. DC-03-424 Honora ble Alex W illiam Gabert, Judge Pre siding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Kar en Ang elini, J ustice

Sandee B ry an Mar ion, J ustice Phy lis J . Speedlin, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: Dec ember 17, 2008 DI SMI SSED Th e pa rt ies ha ve fi le d a

joi nt m oti on

to d ism iss thi s a

pp e a l, s ta tin g that th e y

ha ve fu lly compromised and se ttled all issues in dispute. The motion is g rante d, and this appea l is dism issed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2. 1( a ); Cab all e ro v . H e ar t of Te x . P izz a, LLC , 7 0 S
. W
. 3 d 1 8 0 , 1 8 1 ( T e x. Ap p. —Sa n A nto nio 20 01 , n o p e t.) . Co sts of a pp e a l ar e ta xed a g a ins t the pa rt ie s w ho inc ur

re d th e m. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 42.1(d). PER C URI AM
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,      2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Sonasoft Corp. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 15, 2009                                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                           |
| /s/Nand (Andy) Khanna                                          |
| Nand      (Andy) KhannaPrinicipal      Executive Officer  |
# C_2010312EN.01001101.xml

| 17.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 November 2010

2010/C 312/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3612 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,21 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4547 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85100 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3753 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3408 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1670 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,607 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 276,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9372 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2925 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9801 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3874 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3817 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5546 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7655 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7682 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 539,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5426 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0355 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3941 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 197,34 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2612 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,566 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,3215 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,652 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3504 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7370 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,6800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3612

JPY

Japanese yen

113,21

DKK

Danish krone

7,4547

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85100

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3753

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3408

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1670

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,607

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

276,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9372

RON

Romanian leu

4,2925

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9801

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3874

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3817

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5546

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7655

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7682

KRW

South Korean won

1 539,11

ZAR

South African rand

9,5426

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0355

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3941

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 197,34

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2612

PHP

Philippine peso

59,566

RUB

Russian rouble

42,3215

THB

Thai baht

40,652

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3504

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7370

INR

Indian rupee

61,6800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WARNDELLA JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv94-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated March 19, 2012. (Doc. 22). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The decision of the commissioner, denying benefits, is AFFIRMED.

DONE and ORDERED this 6th day of September, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00094-MP-GRJ Document 23 Filed 09/06/12 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHARLES LITTON MORRIS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:11cv1/MCR/EMT

SUSAN STOKES CASTOR,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated February 24, 2011 (Doc. 8). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice on Rooker-Feldman and Younger

abstention grounds.

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. 

4. Final judgment shall be entered accordingly, and the clerk is directed to close

the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of March, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHARLES MERIWEATHER.

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 5:11cv118/MCR/EMT

PAIGE AUGUSTINE,

Respondent

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated April 30, 2012 (doc. 19). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), but no objections

have been filed.1

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 (doc. 5), is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of June, 2012.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Clerk’s office staff notes reflect that the Report and Recommendation was 1

returned as undeliverable and that, according to the BOP website Inmate Locator, the

plaintiff was released April 30, 2012. 

Case 5:11-cv-00118-MCR-EMT Document 22 Filed 06/04/12 Page 1 of 1
<page>
	 		  		  EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Managed
Futures MV, L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Christian Angstadt

Name:	   Christian Angstadt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC,
		   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   August 13, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

IVAN RAY BEGAY,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-230-RS-CJK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Respondents.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 

24) and Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. 26). I have considered Petitioner’s 

objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is 

DISMISSED with prejudice. 

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on February 9, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00230-RS-CJK Document 27 Filed 02/09/12 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011236EN.01000702.xml

| 12.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6171 — IPIC/CEPSA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 236/05

On 5 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6171. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6171. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1



                              THOUSAND TRAILS, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                    (DOLLARS AND COMMON SHARES IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Year Ended         Year Ended        Year Ended
                                                            June 30, 1999      June 30, 1998      June 30, 1997
                                                           ---------------    ---------------    ---------------
<S>                                                        <C>                <C>                <C>
BASIC:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                 7,630              7,407              7,223
                                                           ===============    ===============    ===============

Net income allocable to common shareholders                $         5,571    $        24,879    $         6,799
                                                           ===============    ===============    ===============

Net income per common share -- basic                       $          0.73    $          3.36    $          0.94
                                                           ===============    ===============    ===============

DILUTED:

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                 7,630              7,407              7,223
Weighted average common stock equivalents -
  Dilutive options                                                     824                975                480
  Dilutive warrants                                                     21                 16                  1
                                                           ---------------    ---------------    ---------------

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding                 8,475              8,398              7,704
                                                           ===============    ===============    ===============

Net income allocable to common shareholders                $         5,571    $        24,879    $         6,799
                                                           ===============    ===============    ===============

Net income per common share -- diluted                     $          0.66    $          2.96    $          0.88
                                                           ===============    ===============    ===============
</TABLE>