alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5267 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify the process for denying, 

revoking, or suspending a registration to manufacture, distribute, or 

dispense a controlled substance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2018 

Mr. WELCH (for himself and Ms. JUDY CHU of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to clarify the process for denying, revoking, or suspending a registration 

to manufacture, distribute, or dispense a controlled substance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5267 IH

1 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF FORMAL PROCESS BY WHICH 

2 A REGISTRANT WHO IS SUBJECT TO AN 

3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE MAY SUBMIT A COR4 RECTIVE ACTION PLAN. 

5 Section 304(c) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

6 U.S.C. 824(c)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (2)— 

8 (A) in subparagraph (A), by inserting 

9 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

10 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘; 

11 and’’ and inserting a period; and 

12 (C) by striking subparagraph (C) (relating 

13 to submission of a corrective action plan); 

14 (2) by striking paragraph (3) (relating to clari15 fication of a corrective action plan); and 

16 (3) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 

17 paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively. 

18 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF IMMINENT DANGER TO THE PUBLIC 

19 HEALTH OR SAFETY FOR PURPOSES OF SUS20 PENDING A REGISTRATION. 

21 Section 304(d)(2) of the Controlled Substances Act 

22 (21 U.S.C. 824(d)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘there is 

23 a substantial likelihood of’’ and inserting ‘‘there is prob24 able cause to believe that’’. 

Æ 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 531 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make an exception to 

the 100 shareholder S corporation limitation in the case of shareholders 

whose shares were acquired through certain crowd-funding or small public 

offerings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2017 

Mr. HILL (for himself and Mr. SCHWEIKERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

an exception to the 100 shareholder S corporation limitation in the case of shareholders whose shares were acquired through certain crowd-funding or small public 

offerings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘S-Corp Access to 

5 Crowdfunding Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 531 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO S CORPORATION SHAREHOLDER 

2 LIMITATION IN CASE OF CROWD-FUNDING 

3 AND SMALL PUBLIC OFFERINGS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1361(c) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(7) TREATMENT OF SHARES ACQUIRED

8 THROUGH CROWD-FUNDING AND SMALL PUBLIC OF9 FERINGS.—The number of shareholders of the cor10 poration shall be determined under subsection 

11 (b)(1)(A) without regard to any individual who has 

12 only acquired shares in the corporation through— 

13 ‘‘(A) a public offering that meets the terms 

14 and conditions set forth in Regulation A pro15 mulgated by the Securities and Exchange Com16 mission (17 C.F.R. 230.251 et seq.), or 

17 ‘‘(B) one or more transactions described in 

18 section 4(a)(6) of the Securities Act of 1933 

19 (15 U.S.C. 77d(a)(6)).’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

22 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5401 

To amend title 41, United States Code, to require executive agencies to 

give priority to entities with on-site child care for employees in awarding 

certain contracts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2018 

Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI (for himself, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. NORTON, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. DESAULNIER, Ms. MOORE, Mr. HECK, Ms. 

VELA ́ZQUEZ, and Ms. WILSON of Florida) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 41, United States Code, to require executive 

agencies to give priority to entities with on-site child 

care for employees in awarding certain contracts, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Care at Respon5 sible Employers Act’’ or the ‘‘Child CARE Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5401 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRIORITY TO ENTITIES WITH ON-SITE CHILD CARE 

2 FOR EMPLOYEES. 

3 (a) PRIORITY TO ENTITIES WITH ON-SITE CHILD

4 CARE FOR EMPLOYEES.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 63 of title 41, 

6 United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new section: 

8 ‘‘§ 6310. Priority to entities with on-site child care for 

9 employees 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In awarding a contract for an 

11 amount exceeding $4,000,000, an executive agency shall 

12 give priority to any entity with on-site child care for the 

13 employees of the entity. 

14 ‘‘(b) RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CONTRACTING PREF15 ERENCES.—In awarding a contract described in sub16 section (a), an executive agency may not give priority to 

17 an offer from an entity described in such subsection over 

18 an offer from a small business concern (as defined in sec19 tion 3 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632)). 

20 ‘‘(c) EXECUTIVE AGENCY DEFINED.—In this section, 

21 the term ‘executive agency’ has the meaning given that 

22 term in section 102 of title 40.’’. 

23 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sec24 tions at the beginning of such chapter is amended 

25 by adding at the end the following new item: 

‘‘6310. Priority to entities with on-site child care for employees.’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5401 IH

1 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub2 section (a)(1) shall apply with respect to contracts award3 ed on or after December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
January 23, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAVID N. WILLIAMS AND GWENDOLYN WILLIAMS, Appellants

NO. 14-13-00978-CV V.

FOREMOST LLOYDS OF TEXAS AND JEFF GREENWOOD, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on September 30, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, David N. Williams and Gwendolyn Williams.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2010212EN.01000201.xml

| 5.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/2

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2010/C 212/02

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Republic of San Marino

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Republic of San Marino

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), the Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Republic of San Marino

Subject of commemoration: The 500th anniversary of the death of Sandro Botticelli

Description of the design: The inner part of the coin depicts Pleasure, a detail of one of the three dancing Graces, freely inspired by the painting ‘La Primavera’ of Sandro Botticelli. On the top the year ‘2010’. On the left the name of the issuing country ‘SAN MARINO’ and the mint mark ‘R’ and on the right the initial ‘m’ of the author Roberto Mauri.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued:

Date of issue:

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 

### OFFICIAL BUSINESS 0 rn ::.:·:· ·**".~-~** U.S.POSTAGE»PITNEYBOWES 

### STATEOFTEXAS

### .·~s· 

# ...•....**~** 

# 4%?:**(~'i;:,--~~F~** PENALTYFOR 

## ,>**~u** '**~"""""""'~** 

### PRIVATE USE

.. · ..

## ~·~ .

## ~~**;~ 701**  

## $ 

# 000.27: 6/29/2015

. '

. 0. LL 0001401623 JUL. 02. 20 1:J FORD, DARREN Tr. Ct.

### No~'132776S01 01 0-A WR-83,320-Q" On this day, this Court has denied**"APPLICA.~T'S** MOTION REQUESTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING HIS MOTION REQUESTING EN BANC REHEARING". / 1 . 

### d}.

. 

# Y (L 

### ;W**~~** Abel Acosta, Clerk 

# \}- 1.\ 

# 5::2 \ ;y v DARREN FORD

---· liT

- TDC 

### # 1789075

( 

### " '':

.. :.:: ·:.\
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 CFR 404(a)(1)(i), the Department of the Army announces the intent to grant a revocable, non-assignable, partially exclusive license to Symbiont Enterprises, Inc., Huntsville, AL, for the AWarE Video Elements (AVE) government-owned software for archiving and conducting searches of video data.

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license can file written objections, along with supporting evidence, if any, within 15 days from the date of this publication.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the Office of Research and Technology Applications, SDMC-RDTC-TDL (Ms. Susan D. McRae), Bldg. 5220, Von Braun Complex, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Joan Gilsdorf, Patent Attorney, e-mail:                         *joan.gilsdorf@smdc.army.mil;*                         (256) 955-3213 or Ms. Susan D. McRae, Office of Research and Technology Applications, e-mail:                         *susan.mcrae@smdc.army.mil;*                         (256) 955-1501.                    

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-586  Filed 2-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2329 

To provide for the acquisition of non-Federal land for inclusion in the Fort 

Monroe National Monument in the State of Virginia, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. KAINE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the acquisition of non-Federal land for inclusion in the Fort Monroe National Monument in the 

State of Virginia, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fort Monroe National 

5 Monument Land Acquisition Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map 

9 prepared by the National Park Service entitled 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2329 IS

1 ‘‘Fort Monroe National Monument Proposed Land 

2 Conveyance’’, numbered 250/154572A, and dated 

3 July 2019. 

4 (2) MONUMENT.—The term ‘‘Monument’’ 

5 means the Fort Monroe National Monument in the 

6 State. 

7 (3) NON-FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘‘non-Fed8 eral land’’ means the approximately 40 acres of land 

9 in the State depicted on the map as ‘‘Commonwealth 

10 of Virginia Land (Fee) Proposed for Conveyance to 

11 the NPS’’. 

12 (4) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

13 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di14 rector of the National Park Service. 

15 (5) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

16 of Virginia. 

17 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF NON-FEDERAL LAND FOR THE 

18 FORT MONROE NATIONAL MONUMENT. 

19 (a) IN GENERAL.—If the State offers to convey to 

20 the United States the non-Federal land— 

21 (1) the Secretary shall accept the offer; and 

22 (2) on conveyance to the United States of the 

23 non-Federal land, the non-Federal land shall be 

24 added to, and administered by the Secretary as part 

25 of, the Monument. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2329 IS

1 (b) MAP.— 

2 (1) AVAILABILITY.—The map shall be on file 

3 and available for public inspection in the appropriate 

4 offices of the National Park Service. 

5 (2) CORRECTIONS.—The Secretary and the 

6 State may, by mutual agreement— 

7 (A) make minor boundary adjustments to 

8 the non-Federal land to be conveyed under sub9 section (a); and 

10 (B) correct any minor errors in the map. 

11 (c) RESERVATION OF RIGHTS.—As part of the con12 veyance of the non-Federal land to the United States 

13 under subsection (a), the State may reserve and retain the 

14 rights of the State under any leases in existence on the 

15 non-Federal land on the day before the date of the convey16 ance. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CARLOS SHAARBAY,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv211-SPM/WCS

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated August 1, 2011. Doc. 8. Petitioner has been

furnished a copy and has filed objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). Doc. 9. Despite the objections, I have determined that

the report and recommendation is correct and should be adopted. Accordingly,

it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 8) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is transferred to the Southern District of Florida for all

further proceedings.

Case 4:11-cv-00211-SPM-WCS Document 10 Filed 08/25/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk shall terminate all motions (docs. 2, 5, and 6).

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of August, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:11cv211-SPMWCS

Case 4:11-cv-00211-SPM-WCS Document 10 Filed 08/25/11 Page 2 of 2
#### SIMMONS v. TEXTILE WORKERS UNION

No. 152 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 220.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1972.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5360 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a credit against 

tax for qualified special law enforcement officers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2018 

Mr. MEADOWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for a credit against tax for qualified special law enforcement officers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Credit for Vet5 erans and Retired Law Enforcement Officers for Securing 

6 Schools Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR QUALIFIED SPECIAL LAW ENFORCE8 MENT OFFICERS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subpart A of part IV of sub10 chapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 


lotter on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5360 IH

1 1986 is amended by inserting after section 25D the fol2 lowing new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 25E. CREDIT FOR QUALIFIED SPECIAL LAW EN4 FORCEMENT OFFICERS. 

5 ‘‘(a) ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT.—In the case of a 

6 qualified special law enforcement officer, there shall be al7 lowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter 

8 for a taxable year an amount equal to $1,500. 

9 ‘‘(b) QUALIFIED SPECIAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFI10 CER.—For purposes of this section— 

11 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘qualified special 

12 law enforcement officer’ means an individual— 

13 ‘‘(A) employed part-time by a local law en14 forcement agency to patrol one or more quali15 fied schools, and 

16 ‘‘(B) who is, on the date such individual is 

17 first so employed, a qualified veteran or a quali18 fied retired law enforcement officer. 

19 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED SCHOOL.—The term ‘qualified 

20 school’ means— 

21 ‘‘(A) an elementary school or secondary 

22 school (as such terms are defined in section 

23 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Edu24 cation Act of 1965), or 


lotter on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5360 IH

1 ‘‘(B) an institution of higher education (as 

2 such term is defined in section 101 of the High3 er Education Act of 1965). 

4 ‘‘(3) QUALIFIED VETERAN.—The term ‘quali5 fied veteran’ means an individual who served in the 

6 active military, naval, or air service, and who was 

7 discharged or released therefrom under conditions 

8 other than dishonorable. 

9 ‘‘(4) QUALIFIED RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT

10 OFFICER.—The term ‘qualified retired law enforce11 ment officer’ has the meaning given such term by 

12 section 926C of title 18, United States Code.’’. 

13 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

14 for subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 

15 of such Code is amended by inserting after the item relat16 ing to section 25D the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 25E. Credit for qualified special law enforcement officers.’’. 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cr30-SPM

HUGO EMMUEL HERNANDEZ-MEJIA,

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Count One of this indictment. The

district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing Defendant's proposed

change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a report and recommendation

as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties consented to this procedure, and

the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the
Page 2 of 3

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:10cr30-SPM
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on June 14, 2010. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:10cr30-SPM