alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Real
Goods Solar, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, D. Thompson McCalmont, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 15, 2009





/s/ D. Thompson McCalmontD. Thompson McCalmontChief Executive Officer
# C_2009270EN.01002001.xml

| 11.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/20

---

Designation of the judge to replace the President of the Tribunal for the purpose of dealing with applications for interim measures

2009/C 270/08

On 7 October 2009, in accordance with Article 103(2) of the Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal decided that, for the period from 1 October 2009 to 30 September 2010, Judge S. GERVASONI, President of the First Chamber, will replace the President of the Tribunal for the purpose of dealing with applications for interim measures in the event of the President's absence or his being prevented from attending.

---
#### STATE v. YARBOROUGH

No. 138 PC.

Case below: 5 N.C. App. 207.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 31 July 1972.
# C_2011081EN.01000601.xml

| 15.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 March 2011

2011/C 81/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3948 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4584 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86590 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8405 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2941 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8290 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,331 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7066 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0315 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1838 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2024 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3846 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3597 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8694 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8918 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7692 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 570,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6345 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1603 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3885 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 221,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2339 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,727 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,8377 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,304 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3210 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6373 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,8501 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3948

JPY

Japanese yen

114,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4584

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86590

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8405

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2941

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8290

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,331

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7066

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0315

RON

Romanian leu

4,1838

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2024

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3846

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3597

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8694

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8918

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7692

KRW

South Korean won

1 570,42

ZAR

South African rand

9,6345

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1603

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3885

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 221,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2339

PHP

Philippine peso

60,727

RUB

Russian rouble

39,8377

THB

Thai baht

42,304

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3210

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6373

INR

Indian rupee

62,8501

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2011234EN.01000202.xml

| 10.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.6166 — Deutsche Börse/NYSE Euronext)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 234/04

On 4 August 2011, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301 / 22967244) or by post, under reference COMP/M.6166 — Deutsche Börse/NYSE Euronext, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5314 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited eligibility 

for health care for mental illnesses for veterans of combat service during 

certain periods of hostilities and war. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2018 

Mr. CARTWRIGHT (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. NEAL, Mr. PETERS, Ms. 

ESHOO, Mr. DEUTCH, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. KILMER, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE

JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. JONES, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. 

RUSH, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Ms. 

WILSON of Florida, Mr. O’ROURKE, Mr. HECK, and Ms. MICHELLE

LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited eligibility for health care for mental illnesses for 

veterans of combat service during certain periods of hostilities and war. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Mental 

5 Health Accessibility Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5314 IH

1 SEC. 2. UNLIMITED ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH CARE FOR 

2 MENTAL ILLNESSES FOR VETERANS OF COM3 BAT SERVICE DURING CERTAIN PERIODS OF 

4 HOSTILITIES AND WAR. 

5 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—Section 1710(e)(1) of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following new subparagraph: 

8 ‘‘(G) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), a vet9 eran who served on active duty in a theater of combat 

10 operations (as determined by the Secretary in consultation 

11 with the Secretary of Defense) during World War II, the 

12 Korean conflict, the Vietnam Era, the Persian Gulf War, 

13 Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, 

14 or any other period of war after the Persian Gulf War, 

15 or in combat against a hostile force during a period of 

16 hostilities (as defined in section 1712A(a)(2)(B) of this 

17 title), is eligible for hospital care, medical services, and 

18 nursing home care under subsection (a)(2)(F) for any 

19 mental illness, notwithstanding that there is insufficient 

20 medical evidence to conclude that such illness is attrib21 utable to such service.’’. 

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subparagraph (G) of section 

23 1710(e)(1) of title 38, United States Code, as added by 

24 subsection (a), shall apply with respect to hospital care, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5314 IH

1 medical services, and nursing home care provided on or 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILLIAM E. GRIFFIN,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:11cv104/RS-WCS

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant. 

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Motion To Strike Defendant’s Eleventh Affirmative

Defense (Doc. 39). Defendant’s affirmative defense incorrectly contends that Section

627.737(4), Florida Statutes, prohibits a claim for punitive damages in a case such as

this, a first-party bad faith action by the insured against his uninsured/underinsured

motorist insurance carrier. This issue has long been settled in Florida. See, State

Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Laforet, 658 So.2d 55 (Fla. 1995), Fla.

Stat. §§624.155(5) and 627.727(10).

Defendant’s Eleventh Affirmative Defense is stricken.

ORDERED on August 30, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00104-RS-WCS Document 45 Filed 08/30/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 5:11cv48-RH/EMT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DAVID BAITY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv48-RH/EMT

EDWIN BUSS et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This prisoner civil-rights case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s 

report and recommendation, ECF No. 32 and the objections, ECF No. 34. I have 

reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. 

The report and recommendation concludes that the case should be dismissed 

based on the four-year statute of limitations. In the objections, the plaintiff seems 

to acknowledge that more than four years elapsed between the alleged violation of 

his rights—the denial of access to the courts in 2005 or 2006, at the latest—and the 

filing of this case in 2011. The plaintiff says he did not know he could file a 

lawsuit seeking redress for the 2005 or 2006 denial of his rights, and he asserts, in 

Case 5:11-cv-00048-RH-EMT Document 35 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:11cv48-RH/EMT

effect, that the defendants’ failure to provide him the tools for finding out was a 

continuing violation that tolled the statute of limitations. That is not so. The 

plaintiff knew the facts that gave rise to any claim by 2006 and did not file this 

case until 2011, after the statute of limitations expired. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is dismissed under 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) based on the statute of limitations.” The clerk must 

close the file.

SO ORDERED on January 15, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-00048-RH-EMT Document 35 Filed 01/17/12 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011151EN.01000301.xml

| 21.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 May 2011

2011/C 151/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4237 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4565 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87705 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9324 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2477 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8280 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,476 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9266 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1125 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2610 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3364 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3799 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0663 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7907 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7614 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 541,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8288 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2429 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4180 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 166,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2974 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,528 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,8982 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,138 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3079 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5655 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,0840 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4237

JPY

Japanese yen

116,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4565

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87705

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9324

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2477

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8280

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,476

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9266

RON

Romanian leu

4,1125

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2610

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3364

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3799

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0663

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7907

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7614

KRW

South Korean won

1 541,57

ZAR

South African rand

9,8288

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2429

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4180

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 166,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2974

PHP

Philippine peso

61,528

RUB

Russian rouble

39,8982

THB

Thai baht

43,138

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3079

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5655

INR

Indian rupee

64,0840

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SEBRA R. ROLLINS,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO. 4:09cv319/RS-WCS

WALTER A. McNEIL,

Respondent.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation On Motion

To Dismiss §2254 Petition (Doc. 13) and Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. 16). I have

considered Petitioner’s objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and is

incorporated in this Order.

2. Respondent’s Motion To Dismiss (Doc. 8) is granted and Petitioner’s

§2254 Petition is dismissed.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on July 27, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George P. Lin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Arrin Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Arrin Corporation.


Date: 5/23/11                           By: /s/ George P. Lin
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name:  George P. Lin
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 26, 2010

0719 

# Order

July 26, 2010

139973 & (19)

LAURA J. POWERS, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139973 COA: 291961 WCAC: 05-000073 PIONEER RESOURCES, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of April 16, 2010, the Wo rker’s Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC) was directed to clarify the reasons for or modify its award of analgesic treatment of the plaintiff’s back. On June 8, 2010, the WCAC issu ed a modified order, accompanied by an explanatory supplemental opinion, terminating the defendant’s obligation to pay for such trea tment as of May 20, 2002. On order of the Court, the WCAC having submitted its m odified order, the applicati on for leave to appeal the October 2, 2009 order of the Court of Appe als is again considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questi ons presented should be reviewed by this

Court.
2018

NIOSH RESPIRATOR FILTER CLASSES

NIOSH classifies the filtering media in respirators based on its resistance to oil 

and its particle filtering efficiency. The resistance to oil is designated as “N”, 

“R”, or “P”. Particle filtering efficiency is designated “95”, “99”, or “99.97”.

N

SERIES

NOT RESISTANT 

TO OIL

N95, N99, N100

Filters at least 

95%, 99%, or 99.97% 

of airborne particles

R

SERIES

SOMEWHAT RESISTANT 

TO OIL

R95, R99, R100

Filters at least 

95%, 99%, or 99.97% 

of airborne particles

P

SERIES

STRONGLY RESISTANT 

TO OIL/OIL PROOF

P95, P99, P100

Filters at least 

95%, 99%, or 99.97% 

of airborne particles

OILS

When products containing oil (like fuel, lubricating or hydraulic oils,

solvents, paints, and pesticides) are sprayed or used in processes

producing aerosols or droplets, the oil component may become airborne.

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

NIOSH Respirator Trusted-Source:

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/disp_part/RespSource.html 

NIOSH Respirator Selection Logic: 

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2005-100/pdfs/2005-100.pdf
EXHIBIT
32.01




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO




SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, John
Hummel, the President and principal executive and principal financial officer of
AIS Futures Management LLC, the General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV LP (the
“Partnership”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Partnership on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.




Date: 
May 1, 2009




By:  /s/ John
Hummel


John
Hummel


President
(principal executive and principal financial officer)


AIS
Futures Management LLC


General
Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

REHABCARE GROUP EAST, INC. d/b/a

REHABCARE GROUP THERAPY SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1: 11-CV-00066

HEALTH FACILITIES, INC. d/b/a

TRI-COUNTY NURSING HOME,

Defendant.

__________________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 

MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE

THIS CAUSE comes before this Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and

Motion to Strike (doc. 7). Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion (doc. 11) does not

dispute Defendant’s Motion and concedes the request. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss GRANTED. Count II of Plaintiff’s Complaint is

dismissed without prejudice.

2. Defendant’s Motion to Strike is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s request for attorneys’

fees as to Count III is stricken from the Complaint.

1

DONE and ORDERED on this sixteenth day of June, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

However, Plaintiff’s request for attorneys’ fees as to Count I remains.

1

Case 1:11-cv-00066-SPM-GRJ Document 14 Filed 06/16/11 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. HEGLER

No. 161 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 51.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1972.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

HANCOCK BANK, a Mississippi 

banking corporation, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-94 /RS-CJK

BOYD BROTHERS, INC., a Florida 

corporation, et al., 

Defendants,

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Withdrawal of Jury Trial Demand (Doc. 56). 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The consolidated cases will be tried by the Court without a jury. 

2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Jury Demand (Doc. 26) is denied as moot. 

3. The hearing scheduled for August 16, 2011 is cancelled. 

ORDERED on August 15, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00094-RS-CJK Document 57 Filed 08/15/11 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SOLCIUS, LLC and GOODLEAP, LLC

( formerly known as LOANPAL)

,

Appellant s

,

v.

SALVADOR MERA Z

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00146

- CV

Appeal from the

168th Judicial District Court

o f El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2021DCV3036 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying the motion to compel arbitration

and remand the case to the trial court with directions to order the parti es to arbitration and to stay

Appellant ’s lawsuit pending the outcome of the arbitration. We further order that Appellant s

recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 2 7 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY , 20 23

.

L ISA J. SOTO

, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Soto, J., Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.) (sitting by assignment)
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

THERESA A SLATTERY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00175-MP-WCS

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court On Doc. 19, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, which recommends that the decision of the Commissioner to deny plaintiff's

application for Social Security benefits be affirmed. After a thorough review of the record, the

Magistrate Judge concluded that “the findings of the Administrative Law Judge were based upon

substantial evidence in the record and correctly followed the law.” Doc. 19 at 31. Plaintiff has

not objected to the recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain

error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 19, is

ACCEPTED and incorporated herein.

2. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is AFFIRMED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00175-MP-WCS Document 20 Filed 07/29/11 Page 1 of 1