alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011168EN.01000101.xml

| 8.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 June 2011

(2011/C 168/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4652 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4568 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89245 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0082 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2237 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8395 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,219 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,44 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9487 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1540 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3188 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3697 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4297 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3976 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7838 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7988 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 586,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8800 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,4963 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4408 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 471,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4059 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,321 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6650 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,366 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3120 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1634 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,4650 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4652

JPY

Japanese yen

117,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4568

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89245

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0082

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2237

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8395

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,219

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,44

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9487

RON

Romanian leu

4,1540

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3188

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3697

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4297

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3976

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7838

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7988

KRW

South Korean won

1 586,88

ZAR

South African rand

9,8800

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,4963

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4408

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 471,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4059

PHP

Philippine peso

63,321

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6650

THB

Thai baht

44,366

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3120

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1634

INR

Indian rupee

65,4650

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BARRY TRYNELL DAVIS, JR., 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 5:10cv233-SPM/EMT

JOHN D. POWERS, et al., 

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated November 19, 2010 (doc. 9). Plaintiff has been furnished

a copy and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 9) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to
Page 2 of 2

comply with a court order. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of December, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 5:10cv233-SPM/EMT
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv56-MP-GRJ

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT

7660 NE 30TH STREET, HIGH SPRINGS,

FLORIDA, WITH ALL IMPROVEMENTS

AND APPURTENANCES THEREON,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

This matter is before the Government’s Motion to Set Aside Decree of Forfeiture

and Dismiss Case. (Doc. 13). On March 25, 2011, this action originated before this court

on the Government’s filing of a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem seeking to forfeit

the subject property owned by Katherine J. Logan and Michael Tiner. (Doc. 1). It has

been determined that the defendant real property was foreclosed on prior to the entry of

the Decree of Forfeiture. (See doc. 8). It appears that the mortgage is legitimate and was

recorded prior to the Government’s Lis Pendens. (See doc. 4). As such, the Government

requests that the Decree of Forfeiture entered on August 24, 2011, be set aside and that

this case be dismissed. No objections have been filed.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

The Decree of Forfeiture entered August 24, 2011 (doc. 8),is VACATED, and this

case DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(1)(A)(i).

DONE and ORDERED this 15th day of March, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00056-MP-GRJ Document 14 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 1
S. 24 

One Hundred Sixteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen 

An Act 

To provide for the compensation of Federal and other government employees affected 

by lapses in appropriations. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Government Employee Fair 

Treatment Act of 2019’’. 

SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL AND OTHER GOVERNMENT 

EMPLOYEES AFFECTED BY A LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS. 

Section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘An officer’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Except as specified in this subchapter or any other 

provision of law, an officer’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(c)(1) In this subsection— 

‘‘(A) the term ‘covered lapse in appropriations’ means any 

lapse in appropriations that begins on or after December 22, 

2018; 

‘‘(B) the term ‘District of Columbia public employer’ 

means— 

‘‘(i) the District of Columbia Courts; 

‘‘(ii) the Public Defender Service for the District of 

Columbia; or 

‘‘(iii) the District of Columbia government; 

‘‘(C) the term ‘employee’ includes an officer; and 

‘‘(D) the term ‘excepted employee’ means an excepted 

employee or an employee performing emergency work, as such 

terms are defined by the Office of Personnel Management or 

the appropriate District of Columbia public employer, as 

applicable. 

‘‘(2) Each employee of the United States Government or of 

a District of Columbia public employer furloughed as a result of 

a covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for the period 

of the lapse in appropriations, and each excepted employee who 

is required to perform work during a covered lapse in appropriations 

shall be paid for such work, at the employee’s standard rate of 

pay, at the earliest date possible after the lapse in appropriations 

ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates. 

‘‘(3) During a covered lapse in appropriations, each excepted 

employee who is required to perform work shall be entitled to 

use leave under chapter 63 of title 5, or any other applicable 

law governing the use of leave by the excepted employee, for which 
S. 24—2 

compensation shall be paid at the earliest date possible after the 

lapse in appropriations ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates.’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSEPH L. STRICKLAND,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv310/RS/EMT

PAIGE AUGUSTINE, Warden,

FCI MARIANNA,

Respondent.

_______________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s letter to Judge Timothy, which the court

directed the clerk to docket as a request for voluntary dismissal of his habeas petition filed pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 19). In the letter, Petitioner asks that his case be dismissed, and as

grounds for dismissal, Petitioner states he would prefer to come back at a later time when he has had

more time to “study and prepare an adequate defense.” Dismissal of this action without prejudice

is proper pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). This dismissal will afford Petitioner

the opportunity to present his claims at a later date, if appropriate, though he should be mindful of

the constraints of the applicable statute of limitations, if any. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That Petitioner’s request for voluntary dismissal (doc. 19) be GRANTED and this action be

dismissed without prejudice.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 7th day of December 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00310-RS-EMT Document 20 Filed 12/07/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No.: 5:10cv310/RS/EMT

Case 5:10-cv-00310-RS-EMT Document 20 Filed 12/07/11 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Research Resources Special Emphasis Panel K01-SEP.                    

*Date:*                         January 15, 2008.                    

*Time:*                         12 p.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, One Democracy Plaza, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         John R. Glowa, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, National Center For Research Resources, Or National Institutes Of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., 1 Democracy Plaza, Room 1078, MSC 4874, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874, 301-435-0807, glowaj@mail.nih.gov.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 19, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-6214 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2010205EN.01001301.xml

| 29.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/13

---

Call for proposals — EAC/42/10

European Policy Network on School Leadership

2010/C 205/09

1.   Objectives and description

Objectives and description

This call for proposals will support the implementation of the Conclusions of the Education Council of November 2007, 2008 and 2009 which agreed to improve the way that school leaders are prepared, selected, educated and trained. It will do so by facilitating transnational exchange and cooperation between policymakers, practitioners, researchers and stakeholders involved in developing school leadership policy through, for example, peer learning, research and analysis.

2.   Eligible applicants

Eligible applicants

This call for proposals is open to public or private, independent organisations with legal personality that have a registered office in one of the countries taking part in the Lifelong Learning programme.

3.   Budget and duration

Budget and duration

The Framework Agreement will last four years; from 2011 to 2014. A budget of EUR 500 000 has been set aside for the first year.

4.   Deadline

Deadline

15 October 2010

5.   Further Information

Further Information

The full text of this call for proposals, and the application forms, are available in English, French and German on the following website:

http://ec.europa.eu//dgs/education_culture/calls/grants_en.html

Applications must comply with the requirements set out in the full text and be submitted using the form provided.

---
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

MONAHAN, CRISFIELD, and LAWRENCE

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Vernon R. MOORE

Sonar Technician Seaman (E-3), U.S. Navy

Appellant

No. 202000091

Decided: 24 September 2020

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: 

Chad C. Temple

Sentence adjudged 24 January 2020 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Base San Diego, California, consisting of a military 

judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: confinement 

for 12 months, reduction to E-1, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: 

Lieutenant Commander W. Scott Stoebner, JAGC, USN

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).
United States v. Moore, NMCCA No. 202000091

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred. Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. 

§§ 859, 866. 

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32





ESTATE COFFEE HOLDINGS CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Estate Coffee Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kelly Warrack, as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: July 20, 2010
By:
/s/Kelly WarrackName:
Kelly WarrackTitle:
Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
# C_2011096EN.01000402.xml

| 29.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5950 — Munksjo/Arjowiggins (Decor and Abrasive Businesses))

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 96/03

On 21 February 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M5950. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M5950. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

NYKA O’CONNOR,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv360/LAC/EMT

OFFICER KELLEY, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause is before the court on Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (Doc. 1). The court notes that Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a motion

to proceed in forma pauperis. Before this matter may proceed, Plaintiff must either pay the fee or

obtain leave to proceed in forma pauperis by filing a fully and properly completed motion and

attachments.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a prisoner

consent form and financial certificate approved for use in the Northern District. This case number

should be written on the forms.

2. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Plaintiff shall

(1) pay the filing fee of $350.00, or (2) submit a fully completed motion to proceed in forma

pauperis with the requisite prisoner consent form and financial certificate, including an attached

computer printout of the transactions in his prison account.

3. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order as instructed may result in a

recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court.
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of September 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cv360/LAC/EMT
#### STATE v. BROWN

No. 49 PC.

No. 61 (Spring Term).

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 724.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 January 1980. Petition by defendants for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 8 January 1980.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5377 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to make available an internet 

platform to prepare and file Forms 1099, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2018 

Mr. RENACCI (for himself, Mrs. BLACK, and Mr. BISHOP of Michigan) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways 

and Means 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to make available 

an internet platform to prepare and file Forms 1099, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Creating An Online 

5 Platform For Instant 1099 Submissions Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTERNET PLATFORM FOR FORM 1099 FILINGS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than January 1, 2021, 

8 the Secretary of the Treasury or the Secretary’s delegate 

9 (hereafter referred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’) 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5377 IH

1 shall make available an Internet website or other elec2 tronic media, with a user interface and functionality simi3 lar to the Business Services Online Suite of Services pro4 vided by the Social Security Administration, that will pro5 vide taxpayers access to resources and guidance provided 

6 by the Internal Revenue Service and will allow taxpayers 

7 to— 

8 (1) prepare and file Forms 1099, 

9 (2) prepare Forms 1099 for distribution to re10 cipients other than the Internal Revenue Service, 

11 and 

12 (3) create and maintain necessary taxpayer 

13 records. 

14 (b) ELECTRONIC SERVICES TREATED AS SUPPLE15 MENTAL; APPLICATION OF SECURITY STANDARDS.—The 

16 Secretary shall ensure that the services described in sub17 section (a)— 

18 (1) are a supplement to, and not a replacement 

19 for, other services provided by the Internal Revenue 

20 Service to taxpayers, and 

21 (2) comply with applicable security standards 

22 developed by the National Institute of Standards 

23 and Technology. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CENTENNIAL BANK,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv124-RH/WCS

ADAMS STREET LOFTS, LLC et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER PROHIBITING THE FILING OF

MONTHLY ATTORNEY-FEE RECORDS

In accordance with the Initial Scheduling Order, ECF No. 27, the

requirement to file monthly attorney-fee records does not apply in this case. No

party may file attorney-fee records until necessary in connection with a motion to

award fees.

SO ORDERED on July 20, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00124-RH-WCS Document 33 Filed 07/20/11 Page 1 of 1