alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# SUMMARY:

The Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee was established by (Pub. L.) 105-121, November 26, 1997, to advise the Board of Directors on the development and implementation of policies and programs designed to support the expansion of the Bank's financial commitments in Sub-Saharan Africa under the loan, guarantee and insurance programs of the Bank. Further, the committee shall make recommendations on how the Bank can facilitate greater support by U.S. commercial banks for trade with Sub-Saharan Africa.

# TIME AND PLACE:

January 16, at 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Export-Import Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.

*Agenda:*                         Introduction of SAAC members, ethics training, report to congress, 2007 SAAC recommendations update, bank operating issues and processes, business development update and “Attracting the interest of new U.S. companies to the African market”.                    

*Public Participation:*                         The meeting will be open to public participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) before or after the meeting. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations please contact, prior to January 16, 2008, Barbara Ransom, Room 1241, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice: (202) 565-3525 or TDD (202) 565-3377.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, contact Barbara Ransom, Room 1241, 811 Vermont                               ( print page 73815)                            Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3525.                    

Kamil Cook,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 07-6193 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 28, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 9223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-935]



[[Page 9221]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2007-11 of January 26, 2007--Transfer of 
Funds Under Section 610 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961



Presidential Determination No. 2007-12 of February 7, 2007--
Implementation of Sections 603 and 604 of the Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act, Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 107-228)



Presidential Determination No. 2007-13 of February 14, 2007--
Presidential Determination on Waiving Prohibition on United States 
Military Assistance With Respect to Chad


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 39 / Wednesday, February 28, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 9223]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2007-11 of January 26, 
                2007

                
Transfer of Funds Under Section 610 of the 
                Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the 
                Constitution and laws of the United States, including 
                section 610 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, as 
                amended (22 U.S.C. 2360) (the ``Act''), I hereby 
                determine it necessary for the purposes of that Act 
                that up to $86.362 million in fiscal year 2006 funds 
                made available under chapter 4 of part II of the Act be 
                transferred to, and consolidated with, funds made 
                available under chapter 8 of part I of the Act, and 
                such funds are hereby so transferred and consolidated.

                You are authorized and directed to report this 
                determination to the Congress and to publish it in the 
                Federal Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, January 26, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-935
Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-781]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 at 10 a.m.

PLACE: 999 E. Street, NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED: 
Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, Sec.  438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-781 Filed 2-15-07; 3:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILLIAM GRIFFIN,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-104/RS-WCS

GEICO GENERAL INS. CO.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Defendant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or to Bifurcate and Stay 

Plaintiff’s Claims for Punitive Damages and Request for Conference (Doc. 7) is 

DENIED. 

ORDERED on June 23, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00104-RS-WCS Document 27 Filed 06/23/11 Page 1 of 1
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00266-CV

LADEITRA STEWARD, Appellant

V.

LA FRONTERA SOUTH PHASE ONE 

AND THE VILLAS OF LA FRONTERA 

SOUTH PHASE ONE HOMEOWNERS 

ASSOCIATION, Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 352nd District Court

of Tarrant County (352-305799-19)

August 29, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
Order filed April 15, 2013 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-01107-CR

____________

ROBERT JAMES TYRRELL, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 23rd District Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 68206

ORDER

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Appellant has made known to this 

Court his desire to review the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1969).

Accordingly, we hereby direct the Judge of the 23rd District Court to afford 

appellant an opportunity to view the trial record in accordance with local 
2

procedure; that the clerk of that court furnish the record to appellant on or before 

May 1, 2012; that the clerk of that court certify to this court the date on which 

delivery of the record to appellant is made; and that appellant file his pro se brief 

with this court within thirty days of that date.

PER CURIAM
Page 1 of 1

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WELLS FARGO BANK NA, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv127-MP-GRJ

BBMJ LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the court on the plaintiff and defendants Brooking and KB 51's

Joint Motion for an Order Requiring the Parties to Attend Mediation Within Sixty (60) Days

(doc. 91) and Joint Motion for Telephonic Conference or Expedited Hearing (doc. 92). 

Defendants Johnson and Brooks, oppose the motions, while defendants Mohr and BBMJ

take no position. The first mediation, held November 29, 2011, ended in impasse.

Nevertheless, the court agrees that a second mediation conference may assist in the just

and speedy resolution of this matter.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The joint motion for an order requiring the parties to attend mediation within

sixty (60) days (doc. 91) is GRANTED.

2. This case is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones to conduct

mediation on or before September 14, 2012.

3. The parties joint motion for telephonic conference or expedited hearing (doc.

92) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of July, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00127-GRJ Document 99 Filed 07/23/12 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 4.17.3**

***Ministry of The Russian Federation for Telecommunications and Informatization***

**Amendment No. 3****to License No. 17938 (registration series A 017202)****dated April 26, 2001**

To amend clause 8 of the Conditions For Carrying Out Activities Under License No. 17938 to read as follows:

“8.

Data transmission services shall be provided to the users of the cellular mobile communications network and of the data transmission networks of OJSC “KB Impuls”.

 

| **First Deputy Minister****of the Russian Federation for****Telecommunications and****Informatization** |   | /Signature//Seal/ |   | B. D. AntonioukApril 11, 2003 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                                                                                                    |   |              |   |                          |
| **Head of the Department****of the Organization****of Licensing Activity**                              |   | /Signature/       |   | N. M. Popov                   |
EXHIBIT 12.2CERTIFICATIONI, Frank Abbott, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosing controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15-d-15(f)) for the company and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluations; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.December 7, 2007By: /s/ Frank Abbott
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RICHARD SCHALLER,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:10cv444-WS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

December 29, 2011. See Doc. 25. The magistrate judge recommends that this case be

dismissed for failure to state a claim. The plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 27) to the

report and recommendation. 

Having considered the record in light of the plaintiff's objections, the court finds

that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 25) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The plaintiff's complaint (doc. 1) and this action are DISMISSED for failure to

state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

Case 3:10-cv-00444-WS-EMT Document 28 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED with

prejudice."

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of January , 2012.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00444-WS-EMT Document 28 Filed 01/17/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

GARNET SHORTRIDGE, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv71-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated April 3, 2012. (Doc. 20). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff’s

application for supplemental security income benefits is REVERSED AND REMANDED

pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to: (i) evaluate and determine whether

plaintiff has any past relevant work; (ii) if plaintiff does not have past relevant work or if she

cannot perform her past relevant work, the ALJ should perform the required analysis at

Step Five to determine whether plaintiff can perform other work; and (iii) make a specific

finding as to whether plaintiff’s moderate limitations in concentration, persistence or pace

are accounted for in the record medical evidence.

Case 1:11-cv-00071-MP-GRJ Document 21 Filed 05/07/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. Pursuant to Bergen v. Commissioner, proceedings on attorney fees under

the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) are stayed until the matter is fully adjudicated

upon remand. 454 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 2006). The Plaintiff shall file a motion to award

fees under 406(b) within 30 days after counsel receives notice from the Defendant

Commissioner as to Plaintiff’s past due benefits. This stay relates only to attorney fee

proceedings under § 406(b) of the Social Security Act, not to attorney fee proceedings

under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, the latter of which may be

adjudicated at this time. 

DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of May, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 1:11cv71-MP-GRJ

Case 1:11-cv-00071-MP-GRJ Document 21 Filed 05/07/12 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011236EN.01000901.xml

| 12.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 August 2011

2011/C 236/08

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4143 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 108,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4506 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87570 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2947 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0499 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8205 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,185 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 276,77 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1759 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3005 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5350 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3875 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4091 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0317 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7353 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7210 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 533,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,3391 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0437 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4515 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 104,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2479 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,146 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,0250 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,372 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3061 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6618 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,1600 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4143

JPY

Japanese yen

108,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4506

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87570

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2947

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0499

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8205

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,185

HUF

Hungarian forint

276,77

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1759

RON

Romanian leu

4,3005

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5350

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3875

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4091

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0317

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7353

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7210

KRW

South Korean won

1 533,02

ZAR

South African rand

10,3391

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0437

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4515

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 104,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2479

PHP

Philippine peso

60,146

RUB

Russian rouble

42,0250

THB

Thai baht

42,372

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3061

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6618

INR

Indian rupee

64,1600

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

for the use and benefit of MCALLISTER 

CONSTRUCTION CO., LLC, an Alabama 

limited liability company,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-100/RS-CJK

GREAT AMERICAN INS. CO. 

of N.Y., a New York Corporation, 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Before me are Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 7) and Plaintiff’s Response 

(Doc. 9). 

This is a case under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3131, et seq. Plaintiff, a 

subcontractor, brings suit against the Defendant surety but not against the 

principal/contractor. The bond in question provides that Defendant is bound jointly and 

severally with the principal (Doc. 1, p.2). “The holder of a joint and several note may sue 

the principal and surety jointly, or at his option he may sue either the principal or surety 

alone." United States use of Apex Roofing & Insulation, Inc. v. Union Indem. Ins. Co., 

865 F.2d 1226, 1227 (11th Cir. 1989) (citing Hicks v. Bank of Wrightsville, 57 Ga.App. 

233, 234, 194 S.E. 892 (1938)).

The Motion (Doc. 7) is DENIED. 

Case 5:11-cv-00100-RS-CJK Document 10 Filed 05/26/11 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED on May 26, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00100-RS-CJK Document 10 Filed 05/26/11 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-37652, 333-64504, 333-64504-01, 333-64504-02, 333-71004, 333-71004-01,
333-71004-02, 333-84418, 333-84418-01 and 333-84418-02 on Form S-3 of TXU Corp.
and Registration Statements Nos. 333-32833, 333-32837, 333-32843, 333-45657,
333-46671, 333-79627 as amended by Post Effective Amendment No. 1 thereto,
333-93183, 333-62016, 333-62014, 333-86640 and 333-92260 on Form S-8 of TXU
Corp. of our report dated March 21, 2003 related to the consolidated financial
statements of Pinnacle One Partners, L.P. (which includes explanatory paragraphs
relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142
as described in Note 1 of the Notes to the Financial Statements), appearing in
TXU Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 27, 2003