alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ELOISE MCKNIGHT, ISACC EUGENE MCKNIGHT,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00180-MP-AK

C R BARD INC, DAVOL INC,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter came before the Court for a removal status conference on September 3, 2009. 

At the hearing the parties indicated that there would be no objection to removal and that the

plaintiffs would be filing a consent motion to transfer this case to become part of a Multi-District

Litigation taking place in Rhode Island. The parties also moved to stay the instant action

pending the filing of this motion and the transfer to the MDL court. The motion is granted, and

this matter is stayed until further order of the Court.

Also pending is Doc. 8, Stipulated Motion for Substitution of Counsel by Davol Inc, C R

Bard Inc. The motion is granted, and BENJAMIN J. BIARD shall be and is substituted as

counsel or record on behalf of Defendants DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC. in this matter.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of September, 2009

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# C_2011085EN.01000801.xml

| 18.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/8

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2011/C 85/05

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Italy

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Italy

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Italy

Subject of commemoration: The 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy

Description of the design: The inner part of the coin shows, at the centre, three Italian flags in the wind, representing the three past 50th anniversaries — 1911, 1961 and 2011 — which illustrate a perfect link between generations: this is the logo of the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy. At the top, the inscription ‘150o DELL’UNITA’ D’ITALIA’ (150th anniversary of the unification of Italy); at the right, the initials of the issuing country ‘RI’ (Republic of Italy); at the bottom, the dates ‘1861 › 2011 › ›’; under the dates, at the centre, the mintmark ‘R’ and at the right, the initials of the artist Ettore Lorenzo Frapiccini and the first three letters of the Italian name of his profession (incisore) ‘ELF INC.’

o

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Volume of issuance: 10 million coins

Date of issue: March 2011

---

(1)  For the other national sides of euro circulation coins, see http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/cash/coins/index_en.htm

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RAY CHRIS MOBLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:11cv206/RH/CJK

STEVE MEADOWS, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

This case filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is before the Court upon referral from

the Clerk. On April 25, 2012, the Court entered an order requiring plaintiff, a prisoner

at the time this action was filed but now released, to update his financial information

by filing an Affidavit of Financial Status within thirty (30) days. (Doc. 12). Plaintiff

was warned that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation

that this case be dismissed. To date, plaintiff has not submitted the required financial

affidavit, and has not responded to the Court’s June 14, 2012 order (doc. 13) requiring

him to show cause, within fourteen days, why this case should not be dismissed.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s

failure to comply with an order of the court.

2. That the Clerk be directed to close the file.

Case 5:11-cv-00206-RH-CJK Document 14 Filed 07/03/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

At Pensacola, Florida this 3rd day of July, 2012.

/s/ Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No: 5:11cv206/RH/CJK

Case 5:11-cv-00206-RH-CJK Document 14 Filed 07/03/12 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.1**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      F-3 (Nos. 333-141529 and 333-147024), the Registration Statements on Form S-8
      (No. 333-148085 and 333-148754) and related Prospectuses of XTL
      Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. of our report dated March 27, 2008 relating to the
      financial statements, financial statement schedules and the effectiveness of
      internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.






/s/
      Kesselman & Kesselman





Certified
      Public Accountant (Isr.)


A
      member
      of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited


Tel
      Aviv,
      Israel


March
      27,
      2008
# C_2011034EN.01000101.xml

| 3.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5785 — Sun Capital/DSM Special Products)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 34/01

On 2 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5785. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5785. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


August 28, 2014


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust, Diversified Income and Growth
Trust, Series 5


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for Smart Trust, Diversified Income and Growth Trust, Series 5 set forth above (the “Trust”).
We enclosed a list of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our
evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on August 28, 2014, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in
the Trust Indenture and Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations
of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-197354) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect
to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                      


Vice President
# C_2011094EN.01001301.xml

| 26.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 March 2011

2011/C 94/08

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4115 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4580 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87780 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9922 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2915 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8840 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,529 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,33 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0095 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0820 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1955 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3807 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3778 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0020 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8749 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7791 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 569,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7056 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2594 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3918 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 303,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2656 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,084 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,9665 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,712 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3414 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8688 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,0590 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4115

JPY

Japanese yen

114,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4580

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87780

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9922

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2915

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8840

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,529

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,33

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0095

RON

Romanian leu

4,0820

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1955

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3807

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3778

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0020

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8749

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7791

KRW

South Korean won

1 569,93

ZAR

South African rand

9,7056

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2594

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3918

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 303,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2656

PHP

Philippine peso

61,084

RUB

Russian rouble

39,9665

THB

Thai baht

42,712

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3414

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8688

INR

Indian rupee

63,0590

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ORLANDO BETHEL and

GLYNIS BETHEL, 

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-72/RS-EMT

CITY OF PANAMA CITY, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6). The 

parties have not filed objections. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order. 

2. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiffs’ failure to comply 

with an order of the court. 

ORDERED on July 12, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00072-RS-EMT Document 7 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 1
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed March 5, 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 01589

- CV

GETHOTDEAL, INC. D/B /A FLORIDA CARS , Appellant
V.
MICHAEL FISCHMAN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 03690

- 2012



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang

- Miers, and Justice Lewis

The Court has before it appellant’s motion to dismiss. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a). We

GRANT the motion and DISMISS the appeal.

PER CURIAM

121589F.P05– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

GETHOTDEAL, INC. D/B/A FLORIDA CARS, Appellant

No. 05

- 12

- 01589

- CV V.

MICHAEL FISCHMAN, Appellee On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court, Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 03690

- 2012. Opinion delivered per curiam before Justice Lang

- Miers, Chief Justice Wright and
Justice Lewis.

In accorda nce with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee MICHAEL FISCHMAN recover his costs of this appeal from appellant GETHOTDEAL, INC. D/B/A FLORIDA CARS.

Judgment entered this 5 th day of March, 2013.

/Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/
ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS
JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Powergae, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew Kovalenko, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |     |  |                                                                         
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 4, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Andrew Kovalenko                                                    
|                     |  |     |  | Andrew Kovalenko                                                        
|                     |  |     |  | Chairman, President Chief Executive Officer (PrincipleExecutive Officer)
MILESTONES IN RESPIRATORY PROTECTION

Pre-1800s

• Pliny the Elder (23−79 AD)

used animal bladder skins 

to filter dust while crushing 

cinnabar 

• Leonardo da Vinci 

(1452−1519) recommended 

the use of wet cloths over 

the mouth and nose

Photo by A.Sych /Shutterstock

1800s−1919

• In 1877, the English invented 

and patented the Nealy Smoke 

Mask 

• United States Bureau of Mines 

(USBM) was established in 

1910

• USBM produced Schedule 13, 

“Procedure for Establishing 

a List of Permissible SelfContained Mine Rescue 

Breathing Apparatus” 

in 1919

Photo by the Fire Museum Network

1920−1949

• In 1920, MSA Safety Company 

manufactured the Gibbs 

respirator, the first respirator 

approved by the USBM for 

industrial use

• The Hawk’s Nest Tunnel 

Disaster in the early 1930s

expedited Schedule 21’s 

standards for filter-type dust/

fume/mist respirators

Photo by MSA

1950−1969

• Schedule 21B’s expansion 

in 1965 provided further 

regulation and protection for 

industrial workers 

• The 1969 Federal Coal Mine 

Health and Safety Act resulted 

in regulations governing 

the certification and use of 

approved respirators in the 

mining industry

Photo by MSHA

1970−1999

• The Occupational Safety and Health 

Act of 1970 established both NIOSH 

and OSHA to protect the health and 

safety of American workers

• In July 1995, the respirator 

certification regulation, 30 CFR 11, 

was replaced by 42 CFR 84

• The necessity for respirators in 

healthcare became apparent with 

the outbreak of TB in the 1990s Photo by spwidoff/Getty Images

2000−2019

• Congress created the NIOSH 

National Personal Protective 

Technology Laboratory in 2001

• The focus of respiratory 

protection for first responders 

shifted after the 9/11 terrorist 

attacks

• Public health emergencies 

like the 2009 H1N1 pandemic 

brought attention to the 

importance of respirators for 

healthcare workers

Photo by FXQuadro/Shutterstock

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

100 Years of Respiratory Protection History, https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/Respiratory-Protection-history.html

September 2019
#### George D. Whitman *et al.,*plaintiffs in error, *vs.*R. B. Bullock, Governor, defendant in error.

When a defendant was> arrested under a bastardy warrant, and gave bond and security to appear before a Jusitce of the Peace at a future day for the hearing of the accusation contained in the warrant:

*Held,*that the bond so given was a legal and valid bond.

Suit on Bond. Amendments. Before Judge Harvey. Walker Superior Court. June Term, 1872.

Martha J. Carson went before a Justice of the Peace and procured him to issue a warrant against Whitman, for bastardy. He was arrested by the bailiff and brought before the Justice for trial. Not being ready, he procured the case *174to be continued till a clay fixed, and gave bond and security for $250, payable to B. B. Bullock, as Governor of this State and his successors, conditioned to be void if he should appear before said Justice on said day to answer said charge.

Pie failed to appear. Suit was brought in favor of Bullock, for the use of Miss Carson, on said bond, against Whitman and his securities, averring Whitman’s failure to appear as aforesaid, and that she had been compelled to spend money in support of her said bastard child.

The declaration was demurred to upon the ground that there was no authority in law for taking said bond, and that Miss Carson had no interest in it, and could not recover on it. The Court overruled the demurrer upon condition that plaintiff’s counsel would strike out all the allegations making a claim for Miss Carson, and that the Solicitor General would prosecute the suit in behalf of the State. This is assigned as error.

E. M. Dodson, by William H. Dabney, for plaintiff in error.

The Justice had no authority to take that bond: R. Code, section 4664. The amendment made a new case: R. Code, sections 3430, 3434.

No appearance for defendant.

Warner, Chief Justice

The defendant was arrested under a bastardy warrant, issued by a Justice of the Peace, and not being ready for a hearing, the case was postponed to a future day, and the defendant gave bond and security for his appearance on the day named by the Justice, for the hearing of the charge contained in the warrant. The defendant failed to appear at the time appointed and suit was instituted on the bond, in the name of the Governor, for the use of Martha J. Carson, against the principal and his securities. There was a demurrer to the declaration, which was overruled by the Court, *175and the declaration ordered to be amended by striking out the name of Mary J. Carson, the usee, to which the defendants excepted.

This was a *quasi*criminal proceeding against the defendant, for investigation before the Justice. The defendant was legally arrested and brought before him upon the accusation of bastardy, and the bond for his appearance was legally taken, in accordance with the provisions of the 4633d and 4635th sections of the Code.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
# C_2011101EN.01002501.xml

| 1.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/25

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6076 — Orangina Schweppes/Européenne d'Embouteillage)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 101/05

On 22 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6076. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6076. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
NIOSH Conformity Assessment Meeting

NIOSH CA 2022-1046

August 2022

 

Meeting with Respirator Approval Holders

September 7, 2022

9:00 AM – 3:00 PM EST

Virtual via Zoom
Document Number

NIOSH CA 2022-1046 Page 2 of 2

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), National Personal Protective Technology 

Laboratory (NPPTL) is holding a virtual meeting on Wednesday, September 7, 2022. All approval holders, 

approval application preparers, and other interested parties are welcome to attend. This meeting will be 100% 

virtual using the Zoom meeting platform. The meeting is scheduled from 9:00 AM until 3:00 PM EST and the

agenda will include a break for lunch. 

Topics to be discussed may include:

• Approval Program Staff introductions

• Recently posted NIOSH Conformity Assessment Notices and some under development

• Current state of NIOSH NPPTL laboratories 

• Respirator-related regulatory and consensus standard development activities (ASTM and NFPA)

• Use of registered trade and certification marks 

• Cross collaboration with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 

• Post-market processes

• Respirator-related research updates

Registration is required for participation. The agenda and any read ahead materials will be provided in advance 

of the meeting to those registered to attend. To register for the meeting, please complete the registration form 

at the following link: https://cdc.zoomgov.com/meeting/register/vJIsd-6rqD8oGv9GjnRlDgg51fLHzCKA9AU.

Meeting with Respirator Approval Holders

September 7, 2022

9:00 AM – 3:00 PM EST

Virtual via Zoom