alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Tricord
Hurricane Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, James K. Tolbert, Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section     1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and
is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.





August
      15, 2008
            By:
            /s/ James
      K TolbertJames
      K. TolbertPrincipal
      Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
[No. 942.]

#### GIOVANNI ESCERE, Respondent, *v.*JOHN TORRE, Appellant.

Appeal Taken eoe Delay — Damages.—Where an appeal is taken merely for delay, damages will be awarded equal to ten per cent, of the judgment. ( *Wheeler*v. *Floral M. <& M. Oo.,*10 Nev. 200, affirmed.)

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, Eureka County.

' The facts appear in the opinion.

*O. J. Lansing*and *D. JE. Baily,*for appellant.

*Laspeyre & Beatty,*for Respondent.

By the Court,^

Beatty, C. J.:

This case was submitted by stipulation upon briefs to be filed. The time within which the appellant was to file his brief has long since elapsed, and he has failed to present anything in support of his appeal. The respondent now moves that the judgment be affirmed, and suggesting that the appeal was taken merely for delay, asks that he be awarded damages at the rate of two per cent, a month on the amount of his judgment, for the time execution has been stayed by the appeal in accordance with the rule announced in *Wheeler*v. *Floral M. & M. Co.,*10 Nev. 200.

"We think the motion should be granted. No error is *52assigned in support of the appeal from the judgment. The appeal from the order denying a new trial is without any pretense of merit. The only ground of the motion was insufficiency of the evidence to warrant the verdict, but the statement clearly shows that if the evidence of the plaintiff was true the verdict was correct. On a direct conflict of evidence the finding of the jury and the decision of the court was for the plaintiff, and there is nothing upon which it can be pretended the judgment or order appealed from could be reversed. It is manifest that the appeal was taken for delay merely, and it has had the effect of staying execution for a period of six months.

The judgment is affirmed with twelve per cent, damages in addition to costs and accruing interest:
# C_2011121EN.01003801.xml

| 19.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/38

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

2011/C 121/12

OJ C 94 of 26.3.2011

History of previous publications:

History of previous publications:

| | OJ C 88 of 19.3.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 88 of 19.3.2011

| | OJ C 26 of 28.1.2011 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 26 of 28.1.2011

| | OJ C 296 of 30.10.2010 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 296 of 30.10.2010

| | OJ C 76 of 25.3.2010 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 76 of 25.3.2010

| | OJ C 303 of 15.12.2009 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 303 of 15.12.2009

| | OJ C 10 of 15.1.2009 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 10 of 15.1.2009

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2473 

To extend certain provisions of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act until September 30, 2030, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. JONES) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend certain provisions of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act until September 30, 2030, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Extension of the Carib5 bean Basin Economic Recovery Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC 

7 RECOVERY ACT. 

8 Section 213(b) of the Caribbean Basin Economic Re9 covery Act (19 U.S.C. 2703(b)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2473 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (2)(A)— 

2 (A) in clause (iii)— 

3 (i) in subclause (II)(cc), by striking 

4 ‘‘September 30, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep5 tember 30, 2030’’; and 

6 (ii) in subclause (IV)(dd), by striking 

7 ‘‘September 30, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘Sep8 tember 30, 2030’’; and 

9 (B) in clause (iv)(II), by striking ‘‘18’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘28’’; and 

11 (2) in paragraph (5)(D)(i), by striking ‘‘Sep12 tember 30, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 

13 2030’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LEAF Equipment Finance Fund 4, L.P. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Moskovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                       |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Robert K. Moskovitz                               |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Name: Robert K. Moskovitz                             |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-6985

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DARREN ANDREW DICKERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CR-92-163, CA-95-118-2)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darren Andrew Dickerson, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts,

United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Dickerson,

Nos. CR-92-163; CA-95-118-2 (S.D.W. Va. May 26, 1995). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DOMINGOS TAVARES,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 4:11cv178-MP/WCS

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.,

Respondents.

 /

ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, who is pro se, submitted a petition for writ of habeas corpus under §

2241, doc. 1, alleging that he had been "awaiting removal to Cape Verde Island, the

country of his birth," for over 180 days. Petitioner contends the United States will be

unable to remove him in the reasonably foreseeable future and there is no significant

likelihood that Cape Verde Island's Consulate will issue travel documents for Petitioner. 

Id., at 1. Service was directed on May 9, 2011, doc. 4, and Respondents have now filed

a motion to dismiss, doc. 12. 

The motion advises that Petitioner was "released from the custody of Immigration

and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on June 27, 2011." Doc. 12, p. 1. Accordingly,

Case 4:11-cv-00178-MP-WCS Document 13 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Respondents contend this § 2241 petition is moot because Petitioner has received the

relief he sought. 

Attached to the motion to dismiss is a copy of the Order of Supervision, signed

by Petitioner on June 27, 2011. That Order provides a forwarding address for

Petitioner. This Order and Report and Recommendation will be provided to Petitioner at

that address as well as the current address of record. If Petitioner does not contest the

dismissal of this petition, no further action need be taken. If Petitioner does challenge

this dismissal, he must file either a motion for reconsideration or he may file objections

as explained at the end of this Report and Recommendation. 

ORDER

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send of this a copy of

this Order and Report and Recommendation to Petitioner at his address of record and

to the address provided by Respondents in the Order of Supervision (doc. 12-1, p. 3): 4

Church Street, Apt. #5, Molden, MA 02148.

RECOMMENDATION

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the motion to

dismiss, doc. 12, be GRANTED, and this § 2241 petition be DISMISSED as moot.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on July 7, 2011.

 S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 4:11cv178-MP/WCS

Case 4:11-cv-00178-MP-WCS Document 13 Filed 07/07/11 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:11cv178-MP/WCS

Case 4:11-cv-00178-MP-WCS Document 13 Filed 07/07/11 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 4 to the
Registration Statement, No. 333-102800, of Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited on
Form F-3 of our report dated November 29, 2004 with respect to the consolidated
balance sheet of Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited and its subsidiaries as of June
30, 2004 and June 30, 2003 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, cash flows and notes thereto for the years
then ended, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Durban
Roodepoort Deep, Limited for the year ended June 30, 2004.

/s/ Johan Holtzhausen                             /s/ Carel Smit
Johan Holtzhausen                                 Carel Smit
Director: Energy and Natural Resources            Managing Director: Energy
                                                  and Natural Resources

KPMG Inc

Registered Accountants and Auditors

Chartered Accountants (SA)

Johannesburg, South Africa
November 29, 2004
Case 3:10-cv-00379-MCR-EMT   Document 73-1   Filed 07/03/13   Page 1 of 4

Case 3:10-cv-00379-MCR-EMT   Document 73-1   Filed 07/03/13   Page 2 of 4

Case 3:10-cv-00379-MCR-EMT   Document 73-1   Filed 07/03/13   Page 3 of 4

Case 3:10-cv-00379-MCR-EMT   Document 73-1   Filed 07/03/13   Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 73852]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6186]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the meeting of 
the President's Cancer Panel.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting. The meeting will be closed to 
the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 
552(c)(9)(B), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended, because the premature 
disclosure of information and the discussions would likely to 
significantly frustrate implementation of recommendations.

    Name of Committee: President's Cancer Panel.
    Date: January 28, 2008.
    Open: January 28, 2008, 7:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: Strategies for Maximizing the Nation's Investment in 
Cancer.
    Place: Chateau Sonesta Hotel, 800 Iberville St., New Orleans, LA 
70112.
    Closed: January 28, 2008, 4 p.m.-6 p.m.
    Agenda: Strategies for Maximizing the Nation's Investment in 
Cancer and discuss potential topics for the 2008/2009 series.
    Place: Chateau Sonesta Hotel, 800 Iberville St., New Orleans, LA 
70112.
    Contact Person: Abby Sandler, PhD, Executive Secretary, National 
Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 6116, Room 
212, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-9399.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the comments to the Contact Person listed on 
this notice. The comments should include the name, address, 
telephone number and, when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person. Information is also available 
on the Institute's/Center's home page: deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/pcp/pcp.htm, where an agenda and any additional information for the 
meeting will be posted when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 19, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-6186 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
**EXHIBIT23.2**

 

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS**

 

We hereby consent to the use of the name Netherland,Sewell & Associates, Inc., and the use of information taken fromour reserve report for BPZ Resources, Inc. (d/b/a BPZ Energy, Inc.),dated February 11, 2009, with respect to the estimate of reserves andfuture revenue to the BPZ Energy, Inc. interest in certain oil and gasproperties located in Corvina Field, offshore Peru, as of December 31,2008, in the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof BPZ Resources, Inc. to befiled on or about March 2, 2009. We further consent to the incorporationby reference of information contained in our report as of December 31,2008, in the BPZ Resources, Inc. Registration Statement Nos. 333-147461,333-126388 and 333-147462 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement Nos.333-126934, 333-147463 and 333-153427on Form S-3, and any amendments tothese Registration Statements.

 

 
|                   | Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                                |   |
|                   | By:                                                 | /s/ C. H. (Scott) Rees III, P.E. |
|                   |                                                |   |
|                   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                   |                                                |   |
| Dallas, Texas          |                                                |   |
| February 27, 2009 |                                                |   |
|                        |                                                     |  |  |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40511 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ELENO JIMENEZ-ARAUJO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-298-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 9, 1998 Before DAVIS, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *Court-appointed counsel for Eleno Jimenez-Araujo (“JimenezAraujo”) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). JimenezAraujo has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5420 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5420

   To authorize the acquisition of land for addition to the Home of 
Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site in the State of New York, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2018

   Mr. Faso introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the acquisition of land for addition to the Home of 
Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site in the State of New York, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``FDR Historic Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. HOME OF FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE.

    (a) Land Acquisition.--The Secretary of the Interior is authorized 
to acquire by donation, purchase from a willing seller using donated or 
appropriated funds, or exchange, the approximately 89 acres of land 
identified as the ``Morgan Property'' and generally depicted on the map 
titled ``Home of Franklin D. Roosevelt National Historic Site, Proposed 
Park Addition'', numbered 384/138,461 and dated May 2017.
    (b) Availability of Map.--The map referred to in subsection (a) 
shall be available for public inspection in the appropriate offices of 
the National Park Service.
    (c) Boundary Adjustment; Administration.--Upon acquisition of the 
land referred to in subsection (a), the Secretary of the Interior 
shall--
            (1) adjust the boundary of the Home of Franklin D. 
        Roosevelt National Historic Site to reflect the acquisition; 
        and
            (2) administer such land as part of the Home of Franklin D. 
        Roosevelt National Historic Site in accordance with applicable 
        laws.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

TARONDA WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00505-MP -GRJ

TONY HALLERTON, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff has filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 alleging denial of

medical care by two employees at Lee Arrendale State Prison in Alto, Georgia. She is

incarcerated at this facility as well. Alto, Georgia, where the events at issue took place

and all the Defendants reside, is in Banks County, Georgia, which is in the United

States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Gainesville Division. 28 U.S.C.

§90. It is obvious that this case should have been filed in the Northern District of

Georgia and, therefore, this case should be transferred to that court pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1406(a). 

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED: 

That this cause be TRANSFERRED to United States District Court for the

Northern District of Georgia, Gainesville Division. 

At Gainesville, Florida, this 17 day of November 2010. th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), a party may file specific, written

objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 14 days after

being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may

respond to another party’s objections within 14 days after being served with a

copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations. Since t

Case No: 4:10-cv-00505-MP -GRJ