alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009231EN.01003801.xml

| 25.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/38

---

Special Report No 6/2009 ‘European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed’

2009/C 231/07

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 6/2009 ‘European Union food aid for deprived persons: an assessment of the objectives, the means and the methods employed’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form at EU-Bookshop.

---
EXHIBIT 12.2I, Nomfundo Vuyiswa Lila Qangule, the Chief Financial Officer of Harmony Gold Mining CompanyLimited, certify that:1 I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited;2 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4 The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [Reserved](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5 The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarise and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 30, 2006/s/ Nomfundo Vuyiswa Lila Qangule
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:10cv454/WS/CJK

MARK DANIEL LEITNER

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Magistrate Judge Kahn on March 15, 2011 

Type of Motion/Pleading: Objection and Notice of Non-Consent Refusal 

of Offer Indemnification Required 

Filed by: Defendant Leitner on 3/14/11 Document 41 

( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

s/ Mary Maloy

Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 16th day of

March, 2011, that:

(a) The objection is OVERRULED.

(b)

/s/ Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
# C_2011090EN.01000601.xml

| 22.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 March 2011

2011/C 90/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4194 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,04 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4571 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87170 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9006 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2836 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8795 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,473 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,15 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7089 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0436 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1610 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2398 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4114 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3860 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0688 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9286 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7971 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 592,29 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8733 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3184 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3770 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 387,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3048 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,816 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,1405 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,979 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3592 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0186 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,8870 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4194

JPY

Japanese yen

115,04

DKK

Danish krone

7,4571

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87170

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9006

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2836

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8795

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,473

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,15

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7089

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0436

RON

Romanian leu

4,1610

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2398

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4114

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3860

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0688

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9286

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7971

KRW

South Korean won

1 592,29

ZAR

South African rand

9,8733

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3184

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3770

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 387,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3048

PHP

Philippine peso

61,816

RUB

Russian rouble

40,1405

THB

Thai baht

42,979

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3592

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0186

INR

Indian rupee

63,8870

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2010335EN.01000201.xml

| 11.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 December 2010

2010/C 335/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3244 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,80 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4548 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83715 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1077 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2998 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9375 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,173 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7097 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0296 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2950 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9847 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3399 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3371 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2965 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7628 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7319 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 509,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,0684 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8147 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3900 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 947,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1518 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,850 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,9198 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,818 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2573 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4947 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,6270 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3244

JPY

Japanese yen

110,80

DKK

Danish krone

7,4548

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83715

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1077

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2998

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9375

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,173

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7097

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0296

RON

Romanian leu

4,2950

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9847

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3399

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3371

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2965

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7628

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7319

KRW

South Korean won

1 509,62

ZAR

South African rand

9,0684

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8147

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3900

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 947,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1518

PHP

Philippine peso

57,850

RUB

Russian rouble

40,9198

THB

Thai baht

39,818

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2573

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4947

INR

Indian rupee

59,6270

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 

KEVIN CHAMBERLAIN, an individual, 

NED NEWCOMER, an individual, and 

JERALD ADLER, an individual, on their 

own behalf and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

INTEGRACLICK, INC., a Delaware 

corporation, d/b/a Clickbooth, JUST 

THINK MEDIA, a Canadian company, 

d/b/a FAREND SERVICES LIMITED, 

 Defendants. 

_______________________________/

Case No. 4:10-CV-00477-SPM-WCS

DECLARATION OF MICHAEL STEFANIUK IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTION OF DEFENDANT 1021018 ALBERTA LTD. TO QUASH 

SERVICE OF PROCESS AND TO DISMISS COMPLAINT

 I, Michael Stefaniuk, state and declare as follows: 

 1. I am Vice President of Engineering for 1021018 Alberta Ltd., dba 

JustThink Media (“JTM”), a defendant in this action. Unless otherwise stated, I 

Case 4:10-cv-00477-SPM -WCS Document 6 Filed 11/03/10 Page 1 of 3
2

have personal knowledge of all matters stated in this Declaration and, if called to 

do so, could and would competently testify thereto. 

 2. I make this Declaration in support of JTM’s motion to quash service 

of process upon it and to dismiss the Complaint against JTM. 

 3. I have reviewed the notice of filing of return of service of the 

summons and complaint that were allegedly served upon JTM, purportedly through 

Clickbooth as JTM’s alleged agent in Florida. 

 4. The law firm of Akerman Senterfitt, noted in the affidavit of service as 

the location at which JTM was allegedly served, with an address in Tallahassee, 

Florida, is not JTM’s registered office, is not counsel to or an agent of JTM, and is 

not employed by or associated with JTM in any way. 

 5. The person listed on that affidavit as having received the court papers 

for JTM, Lisa Malwitz, is not an agent or employee of JTM, nor is she associated 

with JTM in any way. 

 6. Likewise, the other person listed in the affidavit, J. Martin Hayes, is 

not an agent or employee of JTM, nor is she associated with JTM in any way. 

 7. The address of Akerman Senterfitt’s offices in Tallahassee does not 

belong to JTM at all and is not associated with JTM in any way. 

 8. Attached as Exhibit A to this Declaration is a true and complete copy 

of the Clickbooth.com Advertisers Terms and Conditions, which is the contract that 

Case 4:10-cv-00477-SPM -WCS Document 6 Filed 11/03/10 Page 2 of 3
governed the relationship between JTM and Clickbooth during the times relevant 

to the matters set forth in the Complaint. 

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of 

America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 2nd day ofNovember, 

2010 at Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada. 

3 


Case 4:10-cv-00477-SPM -WCS Document 6 Filed 11/03/10 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,662,420                 780,875
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,490,282               8,636,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                   220,951                  12,072
<INVENTORY>                                  9,111,620               5,894,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,853,588              15,744,316
<PP&E>                                       3,311,308               2,108,014
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,426,177               1,091,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,920,945              17,775,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,665,789               5,533,060
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,030,897              12,073,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,920,945              17,775,208
<SALES>                                    107,486,652              63,427,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           107,486,652              63,427,728
<CGS>                                       88,190,214              52,061,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              103,631,151              61,231,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               136,872                 322,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             180,373                 312,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,718,629               1,872,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,507,020                 755,693
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,211,609               1,117,231
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,211,609               1,117,231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.58                    0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58                    0.44
        

</TABLE>
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5317 

AN ACT 

To repeal section 2141 of the Revised Statutes to remove 

the prohibition on certain alcohol manufacturing on Indian lands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5317 EH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN ALCO2 HOL MANUFACTURING ON INDIAN LANDS. 

3 Section 2141 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 251) 

4 is repealed. 

5 SEC. 2. NO EFFECT ON TAXATION OR STATE AUTHORITY TO 

6 REGULATE ALCOHOL WITHIN STATE BOR7 DERS. 

8 (a) NO EFFECT ON TAXATION.—Nothing in section 

9 1 or the repeal made by section 1 shall affect State or 

10 Federal taxation. 

11 (b) STATE AUTHORITY UNAFFECTED.—Nothing in 

12 section 1 or the repeal made by section 1 shall diminish, 

13 enlarge, or otherwise affect a State’s authority to regulate 

14 the importation and sale of alcoholic beverages within its 

15 own borders, including State authority over the manufac16 ture, distribution, transportation, or sale of intoxicating 

17 liquors. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 12, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5317 

AN ACT 

To repeal section 2141 of the Revised Statutes to 

facturing on Indian lands. remove the prohibition on certain alcohol manu-
NO. 12-11-00140-CR

 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

DONNIE WAYNE CHALK, § APPEAL FROM THE 114TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Appellant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance, and the trial court placed 

him on deferred adjudication community supervision. The trial court revoked Appellant’s 

deferred adjudication community supervision, found him guilty, and sentenced him to fifteen 

years of imprisonment. We have received the trial court’s certification showing that Appellant 

waived his right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). The certification is signed by Appellant 

and his counsel. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered June 15, 2011.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ALAN JAY WILSON,

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 4:11cv307-SPM/CAS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 15) which recommends that the

Commissioner’s decision be reversed and that this case be remanded for further

consideration. The parties have been afforded an opportunity to file objections,

but no objections have been filed. Upon consideration, I have determined that

the Report and Recommendation is accurate and should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 15) is

adopted and incorporated by reference into this order.

Case 4:11-cv-00307-SPM-CAS Document 17 Filed 04/12/12 Page 1 of 2
2. The decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff’s application for

Social Security benefits is reversed and this case is remanded for

further consideration as set forth in the Report and

Recommendation (doc. 15).

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

-2-

Case 4:11-cv-00307-SPM-CAS Document 17 Filed 04/12/12 Page 2 of 2
Facial Hairstyles and Filtering Facepiece Respirators 

Intended for workers who wear tight-fitting respirators

RESPIRATOR SEALING SURFACE 

CLEAN SHAVEN STUBBLE LONG STUBBLE FULL BEARD FRENCH FORK DUCKTAIL VERDI GARIBALDI BANDHOLZ 

SOUL PATCH GOATEE 

(Careful! Chin hair may 

easily cross the seal) 

CHIN CURTAIN EXTENDED GOATEE CIRCLE BEARD ANCHOR BALBO 

(Careful! Chin hair may easily cross the seal) 

VAN DYKE IMPERIAL 

SIDE WHISKERS MUTTON CHOPS HULIHEE HORSESHOE 

(Careful not to 

cross the seal) 

ZAPPA WALRUS PAINTER’S BRUSH CHEVRON HANDLEBAR 

PENCIL LAMPSHADE ZORRO VILLAIN 

(Careful not to 

cross the seal) 

WET NOODLE ENGLISH DALI 

*

If your respirator has an exhalation valve, some of these styles may interfere with the valve working properly if the facial hair comes in contact with it.

†

This graphic may not include all types of facial hairstyles. For any style, hair should not cross under the respirator sealing surface.

Source: OSHA Respiratory Protection Standard

https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=standards&p_id=12716

Further Reading: NIOSH Respirator Trusted-Source Webpage

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/topics/respirators/disp_part/respsource3fittest.html

Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention 

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health 

2017
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# DATE AND TIME:

Wednesday, February 21, 2007 at 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E. Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

 

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g. 

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C. 

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration. 

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-781  Filed 2-15-07; 3:42 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
# C_2010149EN.01000801.xml

| 8.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/8

---

Special Report No 1/2010 ‘Are simplified customs procedures for imports effectively controlled?’

2010/C 149/06

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 1/2010 ‘Are simplified customs procedures for imports effectively controlled?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0412

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

THOMAS JOE ELLSWORTH,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 25, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 19 2022

01/19/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0412