alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5418 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out 

the Medical Surgical Prime Vendor program using multiple prime vendors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5418 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Affairs Med3 ical-Surgical Purchasing Stabilization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MEDICAL SURGICAL PRIME VENDOR PROGRAM. 

5 (a) VENDORS.—In procuring certain medical, sur6 gical, and dental supplies or laboratory supplies for med7 ical centers of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the 

8 Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall carry out the Medical 

9 Surgical Prime Vendor program, or successor program, in 

10 a manner that— 

11 (1) requires the Secretary to award contracts to 

12 multiple regional prime vendors instead of a single 

13 nationwide prime vendor; and 

14 (2) prohibits a prime vendor from solely design15 ing the formulary of such supplies. 

16 (b) CLINICALLY DRIVEN SOURCING.— 

17 (1) EXPERTISE.—In carrying out the formulary 

18 of supplies under the Medical Surgical Prime Vendor 

19 program, or successor program, the Secretary shall 

20 ensure that each employee of the Department of 

21 Veterans Affairs who conducts formulary analyses or 

22 makes decisions with respect to including items on 

23 the formulary has medical expertise relevant to the 

24 items for which the employee conducts such analyses 

25 or makes such decisions. 
3 

•HR 5418 EH

1 (2) LISTS.—Not later than 30 days after the 

2 date of the enactment of this Act, and quarterly 

3 thereafter with respect to any updates, the Secretary 

4 shall submit to the Committees on Veterans’ Affairs 

5 of the House of Representatives and the Senate a 

6 list of each employee described in paragraph (1) and 

7 the relevant medical expertise of the employee, listed 

8 by the categories of items in the formulary described 

9 in such paragraph. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5418 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry 

using multiple prime vendors. out the Medical Surgical Prime Vendor program
# CA2010261EN.01000101.xml

| 28.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 261/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 261/1

---

Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/178-179/10

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 110 A of 29 April 2010
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 110 A of 29 April 2010

(2010/C 261 A/01)

On page 5, section VI, point 1:

for:

| ‘1. | Invitation to the assessment centre: |
| --- | --- |

‘1.

You will be invited to attend an assessment centre session, which will normally be held in Brussels over the course of a day, if:

| — | you are one of the candidates with the highest marks in the admission tests (4) (if such tests were held, see IV) and at least the pass marks;

  and |
| --- | --- |

—

you are one of the candidates with the highest marks in the admission tests (4) (if such tests were held, see IV) and at least the pass marks;

and

| — | the information given in your on-line application shows that you fulfil the general and specific conditions listed in section III;

  and |
| --- | --- |

—

the information given in your on-line application shows that you fulfil the general and specific conditions listed in section III;

and

| — | you obtained one of the highest marks in the selection based on qualifications.’, |
| --- | --- |

—

you obtained one of the highest marks in the selection based on qualifications.’,

read:

| ‘1. | Invitation to the assessment centre: |
| --- | --- |

‘1.

If

| — | you are one of the candidates with the highest marks in the admission tests (4) (if such tests were held, see IV) and at least the pass marks,

  and |
| --- | --- |

—

you are one of the candidates with the highest marks in the admission tests (4) (if such tests were held, see IV) and at least the pass marks,

and

| — | the information given in your on-line application shows that you fulfil the general and specific conditions listed in section III,

  and |
| --- | --- |

—

the information given in your on-line application shows that you fulfil the general and specific conditions listed in section III,

and

| — | you obtained one of the highest marks in the selection based on qualifications, |
| --- | --- |

—

you obtained one of the highest marks in the selection based on qualifications,

you will be invited

| — | to take part in the case study in the chosen field, which will normally be held in Brussels over the course of half a day,

  and |
| --- | --- |

—

to take part in the case study in the chosen field, which will normally be held in Brussels over the course of half a day,

and

| — | to take part in the other elements at the assessment centre, which will normally be held in Brussels over the course of a day.’ |
| --- | --- |

—

to take part in the other elements at the assessment centre, which will normally be held in Brussels over the course of a day.’

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KURTIS ROY JETER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-135-RS-CJK

ISAAC KENNETH DUREN, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 

31) and Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. 34). I have considered Petitioner’s objections 

de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. Defendant Pierce’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15) is 

GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter final summary 

judgment in favor of Defendant Pierce.

3. Defendant Duren’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

(Doc. 16) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter final 

Case 5:11-cv-00135-RS-CJK Document 37 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 2
summary judgment in favor of Defendant Duren as to all of 

Plaintiff’s federal claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

4. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 8) is 

DENIED.

5. Plaintiff’s state-law tort claims against Defendant Duren are

remanded to state court.

6. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on March 30, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00135-RS-CJK Document 37 Filed 03/30/12 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MARCHELLO JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:11cv218-RH/WCS

OFFICER LYNCH,

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an order filed October 7,

2011, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint by November 8, 2011. Doc.

13. On October 24, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion to vacate that order which was referred

to the assigned District Judge. Doc. 14. On November 1, 2011, District Judge Hinkle

entered an order overruling the objections to the October 7, 2011 order, and directed

Plaintiff to file his amended complaint by December 1, 2011. Doc. 16. On November

23, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, doc. 17, which was denied by

Judge Hinkle on November 30, 2011. Doc. 18. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Case 4:11-cv-00218-RH-WCS Document 19 Filed 12/12/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, this complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

Plaintiff shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by filing a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on December 12, 2011.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:11cv218-RH/WCS

Case 4:11-cv-00218-RH-WCS Document 19 Filed 12/12/11 Page 2 of 2
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior National Park Service
 AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Public notice.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         October 1, 2007.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo A. Pendry, Concession Program Manager, National Park Service, Washington, DC 20240, Telephone 202/513-7156.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to 36 CFR 51.23, public notice is hereby given that the National Park Service proposes to extend the following expiring concession contracts for a period of up to 1 year, or until such time as a new contract is executed, whichever occurs sooner.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All of the listed concession authorizations will expire by their terms on or before September 30, 2007. The National Park Service has determined that the proposed short-term extensions are necessary in order to avoid interruption of visitor  services and has taken all reasonable and appropriate steps to consider alternatives to avoid such interruption. Concession
Contract number
Concessioner name
ParkLARO003-92
Colville Tribal Enterprise Corporation
Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area.STLI003-89
ARAMARK Sports and Entertainment Services, Inc
Statue of Liberty National Monument.ISRO002-02
Forever NPC Resorts, LLC
Isle Royale National Park.GRSM001-07
Cades Cove Campground Store, Inc
Great Smoky Mountains National Park.
 Dated: October 3, 2007. Katherine H. Stevenson, Acting Assistant Director, Business Services.


[FR Doc. 07-5923  Filed 12-3-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312-53-M
<page>
	  				        EXHIBIT 31.02
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Christian Angstadt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Morgan
Stanley Managed Futures HV, L.P.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

    b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant?s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant?s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant?s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant?s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant?s internal
control over financial reporting; and


<page>
5.	The registrant?s other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant?s auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant?s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant?s ability to record, process, summarize, and
report financial information; and

    b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant?s internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  November 20, 2008   By: /s/Christian Angstadt
                                  Christian Angstadt
                                  Chief Financial Officer,
                                  Demeter Management Corporation,
                                  general partner of the registrant
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

139973 & (19) 

LAURA J. POWERS, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139973 

 COA: 291961 

WCAC: 05-000073 

PIONEER RESOURCES, INC., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 By order of April 16, 2010, the Worker’s Compensation Appellate Commission 

(WCAC) was directed to clarify the reasons for or modify its award of analgesic 

treatment of the plaintiff’s back. On June 8, 2010, the WCAC issued a modified order, 

accompanied by an explanatory supplemental opinion, terminating the defendant’s 

obligation to pay for such treatment as of May 20, 2002. On order of the Court, the 

WCAC having submitted its modified order, the application for leave to appeal the 

October 2, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is again considered, and it is DENIED, 

because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this 

Court.
EXHIBIT 10



CANALASKA VENTURES LTD.



NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL AND SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS



NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Annual General and Special Meeting of the Shareholders of CanAlaska Ventures Ltd. (the "Company") will be held at 2303 West 41st Avenue, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6M 2A3 on September 20, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. (Vancouver time) for the following purposes:



1.

To receive and consider the Annual Report prepared by the Directors of the Company, the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006, and the auditors report thereon.



2.

To approve and ratify the actions, deeds, and conduct of the directors on behalf of the Company since the date of the last Annual General Meeting.



3.

To re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, formerly Staley, Okada & Partners, Chartered Accountants, as auditors for the ensuing year and to authorize the Directors to fix their remuneration.



4.

To set the number of directors at five.



5.

To elect Directors for the ensuing year.



6.

To approve, by disinterested shareholders, the amendment to the Companys stock option plan (the Plan) to increase the maximum number of common shares of the Company which may be allocated for issuance pursuant to incentive stock options under the Plan to 15,450,578 shares.



7.

To approve, by disinterested shareholders, the potential amendment(s) to any stock options granted to Insiders.



8.

To approve the potential issuance of nominal value performance shares as fully described in the Information Circular.



9.

To approve, by special resolution, that:



(a)

the name of the Company be changed to CanAlaska Uranium Ltd.", or such other name as may be approved by the Directors of the Company and by regulatory authorities, that such name change be effected at such time as may be determined and approved by the Directors of the Company;

(b)

the Notice of Articles of the Company be altered accordingly;

(c)

subject to paragraph (d) below, the solicitors for the Company are authorized and directed to prepare and electronically file the Notice of Alteration with the Registrar of Companies; and

(d)

the Notice of Alteration shall not be filed with the Registrar of Companies unless and until this resolution has been received for deposit at the Company's record office.



10.

To transact any other business which may properly come before the Meeting.



It is important that your shares be represented at this Meeting to ensure a quorum.  If you cannot be present to vote in person, please ensure that your proxy or, if a corporation, your representative, is appointed and present to vote on your behalf at the Meeting.  Instructions regarding the appointment of a proxy or representative are contained in the Information Circular.



DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia this 24th day of August, 2006.



BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS



"Harry Barr"



Chairman
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73007-73011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 08-28]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-28 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: December 18, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 73008]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE07.029


[[Page 73009]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE07.030


[[Page 73010]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE07.031


[[Page 73011]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE07.032

[FR Doc. 07-6177 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of HPC POS SYSTEM, CORP. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mordechai Guttman, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Mordechai Guttman Mordechai Guttman Title: President and Chief Financial Officer   August 12, 2008
Order filed, January 21, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00660-CV

____________

MICHAEL SILBERSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY, MICHAEL R. 

SILBERSTEIN, LTD, MAGIC HOMES INVESTMENTS, LTD AND 

ANNETTE SILBERSTEIN, Appellant

V.

TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK F/K/A REPUBLIC NATIONAL BANK, 

Appellee

On Appeal from the 268th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-DCV-190480

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due September 15, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Vanessa Owens, the substitute court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

USMAN KHAN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-415 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed August 23, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Mark D. Kiser, Judge. Alex R. Stavrou, Tampa, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General,Tallahassee, and Linsey SimsBohnenstiehl, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

VILLANTI, ATKINSON, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ray L. Unruh, Acting Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date:  November
      15, 2010
                  
                  /s/
      Ray L. UnruhName: Ray
      L. UnruhTitle: Acting
      Chief Financial Officer