alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

January 14, 2013

By the Court:

No. 11‐1683

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff‐Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER L. SPEARS,

Defendant‐Appellant.

Appeal from the

United States District Court for the

Northern District of Indiana,

Hammond Division.

No. 2:10cr55‐001

Rudy Lozano,

Judge.

O R D E R

The petition for rehearing en banc is GRANTED. The panel’s opinion and judgment

are VACATED. The parties shall file new briefs addressing the following question:

Does the crime of aggravated identity theft as defined in

18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1) require a theft or other misappropriation of another person’s

identifying information when the prosecution relies only on the “knowing transfer”

part of the statute?

In addition to any other statutory language that bears on the question, the parties

should specifically address the meaning of the phrases “without lawful authority” and

“means of identification of another person.” The parties should also address the effect, if any,

of the Supreme Court’s decision in Flores‐Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), on

this question.
No. 11‐1683 Page 2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that briefing will proceed as follows:

1.  The opening brief of defendant‐appellant Christopher Spears is due on or before

February 11, 2013.

2.  The responsive brief of plaintiff‐appellee the United States is due on or before

March 13, 2013.

3.  The reply brief is due on or before March 27, 2013.

Counsel should submit thirty‐five (35) copies of all briefs, appendices, and citations

of additional authority.

Oral argument will be scheduled by separate order.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00001-MP-GRJ

SCOTT THOMAS LYONS, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 47, Motion to File Motion to Continue

Under Seal by Scott Thomas Lyons. The government does not oppose defendant’s

motion. Accordingly, the motion to continue, when filed, shall be filed under seal.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of December, 2011. 

áBZtÜç eA ]ÉÇxá 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 08-23] 

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-23 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: December 11, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 71652)          ( print page 71653)          ( print page 71654)          ( print page 71655)          ( print page 71656)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-6062 Filed 12-17-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
----

| (1) | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December      31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or      78o(d)); and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Corporation. |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      March 31, 2008 |  /s/  Paul Van      Ostenbridge |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Paul      Van Ostenbridge                      |
|                       | Chief      Executive Officer                   |
|                       |                                           |
|                       |                                           |
| Dated:      March 31, 2008 |  /s/ Julie E.  Holland                    |
|                       | Julie      E. Holland                          |
|                       | Senior      Vice President and Treasurer       |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice 05-154] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of Renewal and amendment of the Charter of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel. 

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to sections 14(b)(1) and 9(c) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and after consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has determined that a renewal of the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon NASA by law. The structure and duties of this panel is unchanged. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. P. Diane Rausch, Office of External Relations, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-4510. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Information regarding the Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel is available on the world wide web at:                     *http://www.hq.nasa.gov/​office/​codeq/​asap/​index.htm.*

Dated: November 17, 2005. 

P. Diane Rausch, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

[FR Doc. 05-23232 Filed 11-23-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-13-U
#### STATE v. WILSON

No. 109 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 474.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 December 1977. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 21 December 1977.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         642,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   85,602
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               753,410
<PP&E>                                      11,848,346
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,615,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,348,037
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,707,063
<OTHER-SE>                                     520,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,615,405
<SALES>                                        272,243
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               276,230
<CGS>                                          252,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  279,272
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,825,678
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              97,158
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,925,878)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   919,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,006,878)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,006,878)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:11-cr-00013-MCR   Document 326   Filed 08/03/11   Page 1 of 6

Case 3:11-cr-00013-MCR   Document 326   Filed 08/03/11   Page 2 of 6

Case 3:11-cr-00013-MCR   Document 326   Filed 08/03/11   Page 3 of 6

Case 3:11-cr-00013-MCR   Document 326   Filed 08/03/11   Page 4 of 6

Case 3:11-cr-00013-MCR   Document 326   Filed 08/03/11   Page 5 of 6

Case 3:11-cr-00013-MCR   Document 326   Filed 08/03/11   Page 6 of 6
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Mark Goldwasser     |
|----------------------------------------|
| Mark                Goldwasser         |
| Chief                Executive Officer |
| December                10, 2007       |

----
# C_2010129EN.01001101.xml

| 19.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 May 2010

2010/C 129/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2428 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4404 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85895 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5545 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4028 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7280 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,458 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7074 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9990 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1950 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9080 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4178 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2760 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6877 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7707 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7227 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 424,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3731 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4851 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2550 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 347,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9931 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,224 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 37,6030 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,186 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2250 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,5704 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 56,6650 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2428

JPY

Japanese yen

115,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4404

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85895

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5545

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4028

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7280

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,458

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7074

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9990

RON

Romanian leu

4,1950

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9080

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4178

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2760

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6877

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7707

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7227

KRW

South Korean won

1 424,93

ZAR

South African rand

9,3731

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4851

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2550

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 347,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9931

PHP

Philippine peso

56,224

RUB

Russian rouble

37,6030

THB

Thai baht

40,186

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2250

MXN

Mexican peso

15,5704

INR

Indian rupee

56,6650

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KENNETH MARTIN BOGGS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv222/LAC/CJK

MARIA IRENE LUCAS,

Defendant.

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated March 12, 2012. (Doc. 15). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have

made a de novo determination of objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed

objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. §

1915A(b)(1) for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Case 3:11-cv-00222-LC-CJK Document 19 Filed 04/23/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23 day of April, 2012.

rd

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:11cv222/LAC/CJK

Case 3:11-cv-00222-LC-CJK Document 19 Filed 04/23/12 Page 2 of 2
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5253 

To amend section 552(h) of title 5, United States Code, to require agencies 

provide records to the Director of the Office of Government Information 

Services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2018 

Mr. FARENTHOLD (for himself and Mr. CARTWRIGHT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend section 552(h) of title 5, United States Code, 

to require agencies provide records to the Director of 

the Office of Government Information Services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Office of Government 

5 Information Services Empowerment Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AMENDMENTS. 

7 Section 552(h) of title 5, United States Code is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following new para9 graph: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5253 IH

1 ‘‘(7) Each agency shall make any record avail2 able to the Director of the Office of Government In3 formation Services for purposes of carrying out this 

4 subsection, upon request of the Director.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is made of the availability for licensing of the invention set forth in U.S. Patent Application No. 11/340,375 entitled “Medical Image Processing Methodology for Detection and Discrimination of Objects in Tissue,” filed on January 26, 2006. The United States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has rights in this invention. 

# ADDRESSES:

Office of Research and Technology Applications, SDMC-RDTC-TDL (Ms. Susan D. McRae), Bldg. 5220, Von Braun Complex, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Joan Gilsdorf, Patent Attorney, e-mail:                         *joan.gilsdorf@smdc.army.mil;*                         (256) 955-3213 or Ms. Susan D. McRae, Office of Research and Technology Applications, e-mail:                         *susan.mcrae@smdc.army.mil;*                         (256) 955-1501.                     

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The invention pertains to the implementation of image processing and response surface methodology algorithms to process images (                    *e.g.,*                     mammogram, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound imagery) to provide improved detection of objects, such as anomalous masses in dense breast tissue, to better characterize these masses as cancerous or benign, and to identify the margins of cancerous tissue.                 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07-720 Filed 2-15-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BRADLEY ROBERT LAMB,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11cv85/RS-GRJ

RICK SCOTT and EDWIN G.

BUSS,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Plaintiff’s Motion For Reconsideration (Doc. 16) is denied.

 ORDERED on May 12, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00085-RS-GRJ Document 17 Filed 05/12/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LINDEN RALPH MOSES,

Agency No.: A098-240-790,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 4:11cv16-MP/WCS

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., et al.,

Respondents.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus

under § 22411

 on January 14, 2011. Doc. 1. An order was entered directing service of

the petition on February 16, 2011. Doc. 3. On March 10, 2011, Respondents filed a

motion to dismiss asserting that this case is moot because Petitioner has received the

relief sought in this case, release from detention. Doc. 11.

1

 Petitioner alleged that Respondents are unable to effect his removal yet refuse

to release him. Doc. 1, p. 2. Petitioner, a native of Guyana, is not challenging the

validity of the removal order, only his indefinite detention under Zadvydas v. Davis, 533

U.S. 678 (2001). Id., at 1-2. 
Page 2 of 2

Attached to the motion to dismiss, doc. 11, is an exhibit which shows Petitioner

was released under an order of supervision on January 18, 2011, because Guyana

declined to issue travel documents for Petitioner. Doc. 11, p. 2; Exhibit 1. 

Because Petitioner has been afforded the relief he sought, release from detention, this §

2241 petition should be dismissed as moot. Furthermore, the docket reveals that mail

to Petitioner has already been returned as undeliverable because Petitioner is no longer

in detention. Doc. 7. Because Petitioner has not filed a notice of change of address

with this Court, it also appears that Petitioner has abandoned this litigation in light of the

fact that there is no longer a controversy between the parties. 

In light of the uncontested assertion by Respondents, it is respectfully

RECOMMENDED that the § 2241 petition filed by Petitioner Linden Ralph Moses be

DISMISSED as moot since he has been released from detention.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on March 14, 2011.

 s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 4:11cv16-MP/WCS
<page>
	 		  		  EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Stanley Managed
Futures LV, L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.









By:  /s/Christian Angstadt

Name:	   Christian Angstadt
Title:  Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation,
		   the general partner of the Partnership

Date:   November 20, 2008