alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5421 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5421

 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  prohibit the use of leaded fuel by aircraft operating within United 
                            States airspace.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 29, 2018

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
  prohibit the use of leaded fuel by aircraft operating within United 
                            States airspace.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Lead in the Air Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LEADED FUEL.

    The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration, in 
consultation with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection 
Agency, shall issue such regulations as are necessary to prohibit the 
use of leaded fuel by aircraft operating within United States airspace 
beginning on January 1, 2023.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 245 (Friday, December 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 72802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6174]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of: Score One, Inc., Physical Property Holdings, 
Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

December 19, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
the issuers listed below. For each issuer, questions have arisen 
regarding the adequacy and accuracy of press releases and other 
publicly-disseminated information concerning, among other things: (1) 
The companies' assets; (2) the companies' current business operations; 
(3) the companies' current financial condition; (4) the issuance of the 
companies' securities; and (5) transactions in the companies' 
securities by insiders, consultants, and other individuals and 
entities.
    1. Score One, Inc. is a Nevada corporation headquartered in Hong 
Kong. The company is dually quoted on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin 
Board and Pink Sheets under the ticker symbol ``SREA.'' The company has 
recently been the subject of spam e-mails touting the company's shares.
    2. Physical Property Holdings, Inc. is a Delaware corporation 
headquartered in Hong Kong. The company is dually quoted on the Over-
the-Counter Bulletin Board and Pink Sheets under the ticker symbol 
``PPYH.'' The company has recently been the subject of spam e-mails 
touting the company's shares.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of Score One, Inc. and Physical Property Holdings, Inc.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of 
Score One, Inc. and Physical Property Holdings, Inc. is suspended for 
the period commencing at 9:30 a.m. EST, December 19, 2007, and 
terminating at 11:59 p.m. EST, on January 3, 2008.

    By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-6174 Filed 12-19-07; 10:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 13.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of CityView Corporation Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,P M Smyth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


P M Smyth
June 27, 2006
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 29, 2023.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 29, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0140. PURE PEACH ORGANIC, INC. v. FFD HOLDINGS GA, INC. et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2023CV382971
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRCIT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 

INVESTORSHUB.COM, INC., 

a Florida corporation, 

MATTHEW BROWN, 

an individual, and 

ROBERT ZUMBRUNNEN, 

an individual, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. Case No.: 4:11cv9-RH/WS 

MINA MAR GROUP, INC., 

a foreign corporation, 

MINA MAR GROUP INC. (OF THE USA), 

n/k/a, EMRY CAPITAL GROUP, INC., 

a foreign corporation, and 

MIRO ZECEVIC, 

an individual, 

 Defendants. 

______________________________________/ 

DEFENDANTS’ DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1

 Defendants, MINA MAR GROUP, INC., a foreign corporation, and MINA MAR 

GROUP INC. (OF THE USA), n/k/a, EMRY CAPITAL GROUP, INC., a foreign corporation, 

submit this Disclosure Statement pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 and paragraph 13 of the Court’s 

Initial Scheduling Order, and make disclosure of the following: 

 1. Both corporate defendants are nongovernmental corporate parties. Neither corporate 

defendant is owned by a parent corporation. No company owns more than 10% of the stock of 

either corporate defendant. 

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 7 Filed 02/23/11 Page 1 of 2
 Respectfully submitted this 23rd day of February, 2011. 

 MESSER, CAPARELLO & SELF, P.A. 

 s\Thomas M. Findley .

 THOMAS M. FINDLEY 

 Florida Bar Number: 0797855 

 P.O. Box 15579 

 Tallahassee, Florida 32317 

 Telephone: (850) 222-0720 

 Facsimile: (850) 224-4359 

 Email: tfindley@lawfla.com

 Attorney for Defendants 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been delivered by 

U.S. Mail & Electronic Transmission to Deanna K. Shullman, Esq., Thomas & Locicero, PL, 

8461 Lake Worth Rd., Suite 242, Lake Worth, FL 33467, dshullman@tlolawfirm.com and Paul 

R. McAdoo, Esq., Thomas & Locicero, PL, 400 North Ashley Dr., Suite 1100, Tampa, FL 

33602, pmcadoo@tlolawfirm.com, on this 23rd day of February, 2011. 

 

 s\Thomas M. Findley .

 Thomas M. Findley 

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 7 Filed 02/23/11 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# *Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement:*

[To be Published]. 

# *Status:*

Closed meeting. 

# *Place:*

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC. 

# *Announcement of Additional Meeting:*

Additional Meeting (Week of February 12, 2007). 

A Closed Meeting has been scheduled for Tuesday, February 13, 2007 at 12:30 p.m. 

Commissioners and certain staff members who have an interest in the matter will attend the Closed Meeting. 

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion as set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting. 

Commissioner Campos as duty officer, voted to consider the item listed for the closed meeting in closed session, and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible. 

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, February 13, 2007 will be: 

An adjudicatory matter. 

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact: 

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400. 

Dated: February 12, 2007. 

Nancy M. Morris, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 07-725 Filed 2-13-07; 11:06 am] 

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WILLIE N MATHIS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00070-MP -GRJ

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 3, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, recommending that the Motion for Rule 60(b)(4) be denied. The plaintiff filed a

response, Doc. 4, which the Court construes as an objection to the Report and Recommendation. 

The Court agrees that plaintiff may not challenge an order of a state court using Fed. R. Civ. P.

60. To challenge a state court conviction, Mr. Mathis must seek relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The motion at Doc. 1 is denied, and the Clerk is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00070-MP-GRJ Document 5 Filed 05/17/11 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces a meeting to discuss various FAA rotorcraft safety initiatives and to gether any relevant information that will help to reduce general aviation rotorcraft accidents.

# DATES:

The meeting will be on March 3, 2007, 8-11 a.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting is in conjunction with Heli-Expo at the Orange County Convention Center, Conference Room W222-B, West Building, Orlando, FL.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jorge Castillo, Rotorcraft Standard Staff, ASW-112, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, TX 76137, telephone (817) 222-5110, or by e-mail at                         *Jorge.R.Castillo@faa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is announced pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 49 U.S.C. 44701 to take actions the FAA considers necessary in order to enhance safety in air commerce and the DOT policies and procedures to seek public participation in that process.

This meeting is part of the Rotorcraft Directorate's initiative and supports one of the top safety objectives of the FAA 2006-2010 Flight Plan to reduce the number of fatal accidents in general aviation. At this meeting, we will brief you on some of the FAA's initiatives intended to reduce rotorcraft accidents, including implementation of Automatic Detection Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B) in the Gulf of Mexico and the use of Night Vision Imaging Systems (NVIS). You will have an opportunity to propose safety-enhancing recommendations and to recommend how the FAA should implement strategies that will help reduce rotorcraft accidents. Attendance to open to all interested persons but will be limited to the space available.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 31, 2007.

David A. Downey,

Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 07-711 Filed 2-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 67 Filed 03/04/13 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 67 Filed 03/04/13 Page 2 of 2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

AK/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO R. JIMENEZ,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

DIRECTOR, NEVADA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS; et al.,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 07-16916

D.C. No. CV-06-00500-RCJ

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Nevada state prisoner Fernando R. Jimenez appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We

FILED

MAR 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
AK/Research 2 07-16916

have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Jimenez contends that the district court erred by dismissing his habeas

petition as untimely because he was entitled to statutory tolling following the

conclusion of the formal administrative review process in which he sought

additional sentencing credits. This argument lacks merit. See Redd v. McGrath,

343 F. 3d 1077, 1082 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Alternatively, Jimenez contends that he is entitled to equitable tolling

because he was engaged in settlement efforts with the former director of the

Nevada Department of Corrections and the Nevada Attorney General’s office. The

district court did not err in determining that Jimenez failed to demonstrate that

extraordinary circumstances made it impossible for him to file a timely habeas

petition. See Shannon v. Newland, 410 F.3d 1083, 1089-90 (9th Cir. 2005). 

 To the extent that Jimenez claims that the district court should have

conducted an evidentiary hearing regarding his claims, the record reflects that the

district court did not err in this regard. See Schriro v. Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465,

474-75 (2007).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.
#### JAMES v. HUNT

No. 89 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 109.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 January 1980.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOHN L. JACKSON, III,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv330-RH/WCS

STATE OF FLORIDA et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER FOR TRANSFER

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 9. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida, Jacksonville Division. The clerk must take all steps necessary

to effect the transfer.

SO ORDERED on December 6, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JACK ANDREW PHILLIPS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-134-SPM-GRJ

WARDEN,

FCC MARIANNA ,

1

Respondent.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, a pro se petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner is a prisoner in the custody of the

Bureau of Prisons. Petitioner paid the filing fee as ordered and also submitted four

service copies of the Petition.

The Court has reviewed the petition, and pursuant to § 2243, the United States

Attorney will be required to file an answer or other appropriate response. Petitioner

shall be afforded an opportunity to file a reply. Upon receipt and review of the

Respondent’s response, any exhibits, and Petitioner’s reply, the Court will determine

whether an evidentiary hearing is warranted. See Rule 8, Habeas Rules. If the Court

determines that an evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 and the record is

sufficient to resolve the petition, then the Court will recommend disposition of the

Petition on the basis of the record presented. See id. 

The petition erroneously names the United States of America, FCI Marianna and the Federal

1

Bureau of Prisons’s Designation and Sentence Computation Center as Respondents. The correct

respondent in a habeas corpus case is Petitioner’s custodian, the warden of the prison where he is

incarcerated.

Case 5:11-cv-00134-RS-GRJ Document 5 Filed 05/25/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Clerk shall furnish by certified mail, return receipt requested, a copy

of the § 2241 petition, Doc. 1, and this order to the Respondent, the

United States Attorney General, and the United States Attorney for this

district, who shall file an answer on or before July 25, 2011. 

2. Petitioner shall have until August 24, 2011, to file a reply, if desired.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25 day of May 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 5:11-cv-134-SPM-GRJ

Case 5:11-cv-00134-RS-GRJ Document 5 Filed 05/25/11 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 70595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6025]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).
    Date and Time: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
December 13, 2007, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes 
its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. In order to increase the accessibility to Board 
meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in 
advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

    <bullet> November 8, 2007.

B. New Business

    1. Other
    <bullet> Bookletter Review 2007.
    2. Reports
    <bullet> FCSBA Quarterly Report.

Closed Session\*\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \*\ Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and 
(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    <bullet> OSMO Supervisory and Oversight Activities.

    Dated: December 6, 2007.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 07-6025 Filed 12-7-07; 1:21 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Personal Protective Equipment 

and 

Working in the Cold 

In 2019, there were 1,015 

deaths due to excessive

cold or hypothermia*

When possible, use an insulated version of your personal protec�ve

equipment (PPE) to protect from both work hazards and the cold. 

Coveralls made of flexible Waterproof boots that are

material for ease of slip-resistant for icy surfaces

movement

Wind-resistent coats with Gloves with highly efficient,

elas�c wrist and waist bands yet thin insula�on to 

to keep out air and moisture maintain dexterity

(snow)

When working in the cold, make your clothes work for you 

Wear appropriate clothing 

- Layered clothing provides be�er insula�on and can be removed to prevent

becoming too hot.

- Tight clothing reduces circula�on to hands and feet.

- Some clothing may restrict movement, which can be a hazard.

Protect the ears, face, hands, and feet 

- Wear a hat to keep your whole body warmer.

- Prevent clothing, boots, and gloves from becoming wet.

Carry extra socks, gloves, hats, jacket, blankets, a change of clothes in case 

what you are wearing gets wet 

Avoid touching cold metal surfaces with bare skin 

*CDC, Na�onal Center for Health Sta�s�cs. Na�onal Vital Sta�s�cs System,

Mortality 1999-2020 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released in 2021. 

Data are from the Mul�ple Cause of Death Files, 1999-2020, as compiled from data

provided by the 57 vital sta�s�cs jurisdic�ons through the Vital Sta�s�cs Coopera�ve 

Program. Accessed at h�p://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd-icd10.html on Jan 22, 2024 1:13:59 PM. 

“Deaths a�ributed to excessive cold or hypothermia” defined using Interna�onal

Classifica�on of Diseases, Tenth Revision underlying cause-of-death code X31 

(exposure to excessive natural cold) and mul�ple cause-of-death code T68 (hypothermia).

Learn more at: h�ps://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/coldstress

February 2024
#### STATE v. SUMMERS

No. 191 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 282.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1972.