alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BRANDI THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cv337-SPM/WCS

DORSEY THORNTON AND 

ASSOCIATES, LLC,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Final Default 

Doc. 8. A review of the court file shows that the complaint was filed (doc. 1),

process was served upon Defendant (doc. 5), and that no appearance, answer or

other defense has been made on behalf of Defendant. Default was entered

against Defendant on September 30, 2010 (doc. 8). Plaintiff is seeking statutory

damages, plus attorney fees and costs as permitted by statute. The attorney

fees sought represent reasonable time spent at the prevailing market rate. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The motion (doc. 8) is granted. 
Page 2 of 2

2. The clerk shall enter judgment in favor of the Plaintiff, Brandi

Thomas, against the Defendant, Dorsey Thornton and Associates, LLC, in the

amount of $5,781.50, which shall bear interest from the date of entry pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1961, and which sum includes:

A. $1,000 in statutory damages under the Fair Debt Collections

Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, and

B. $1,000 in statutory damages under the Florida Consumer

Collection Practices Act, Fla. Stat. § 559.72, and

C. $425 in costs under 15 U.S.C. § 1692(k)(a)(3) and 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1920, and

D. $3,356.50 in attorney fees under 15 U.S.C. § 1692(k)(a)(3).

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of November, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:10cv337-SPM/WCS
Exhibit 31.2  Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer   I, Carol Laufer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: February 13, 2009  /s/ Carol Laufer Carol Laufer Title: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2010348EN.01000201.xml

| 21.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6034 — Nordic Capital/SafeRoad/ViaCon)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 348/03

On 14 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6034. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6034. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5169 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5169

To amend the Competitive, Special, and Facilities Research Grant Act to 
prioritize research on sensor and imager technology in agriculture, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2018

   Mr. Soto introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Competitive, Special, and Facilities Research Grant Act to 
prioritize research on sensor and imager technology in agriculture, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENSOR AND IMAGER TECHNOLOGY IN AGRICULTURE.

    (a) Agriculture and Food Research Initiative.--Section 2(b)(2)(E) 
of the Competitive, Special, and Facilities Research Grant Act (7 
U.S.C. 3157(b)(2)(E)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating clauses (iii) and (iv) as clauses (iv) 
        and (v), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after clause (ii) the following new 
        clause:
                            ``(iii) sensor and imager technology;''.
    (b) Specialty Crop Research Initiative.--Paragraph (4) of section 
412(b) of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform 
Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C. 7632(b)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(4) new innovations and technology, including--
                    ``(A) improved mechanization and technologies that 
                delay or inhibit ripening; and
                    ``(B) sensor and imager technology.''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DONALD DIXON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-00056-RS-AK

WALTER MCNEIL,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Before me is the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1). Petitioner has paid the

filing fee, and accordingly Petitioner’s Motion For Extension Of Time To Pay The Fee (Doc. 6)

is denied as moot.

Respondent shall, within the time set forth below, file an answer addressing the

allegations in the petition. § 2254 Rule 5(b). "In addition, [the answer] must state whether any

claim in the petition is barred by a failure to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar, nonretroactivity, or a statute of limitations." Id. Respondent may respond to the merits without

waiving the exhaustion requirement. See § 2254(b)(2) and § 2254(b)(3). Respondent shall

include references to the record (included with the answer pursuant to § 2254 Rule 5(d)) and

citations to relevant legal authority. 

The response shall be styled as an answer unless a motion to dismiss the entire petition is

appropriate. If a motion to dismiss is filed, Respondent need not also file an answer unless

directed by the Court. If an answer is filed raising a procedural defense to any ground for relief,

Respondent may await a ruling before responding on the merits to that particular ground. 
Page 2 of 2

Petitioner may file a reply to any of Respondent's arguments within the time set by this

order, but is not required to do so. § 2254 Rule 5(e).

The Court will review the record after the answer and Petitioner’s reply (if any) are filed. 

If it does not appear that a hearing or additional argument is warranted, then the undersigned will

enter a report and recommendation for disposition of the § 2254 petition. If an evidentiary

hearing is warranted and permitted, counsel will be appointed. § 2254 Rule 8. 1

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The clerk shall serve a copy of (Doc. 1), along with this Order, to Respondent and the

Attorney General of the State of Florida via certified mail, return receipt requested. 

2. Respondent shall file an answer or other pleading on or before August 16, 2010. If

voluminous exhibits or records (such as transcripts) are submitted in support of the answer,

paper copies shall be provided to the court. 

3. Petitioner shall have until September 15, 2010, to file a reply, if desired.

ORDERED on May 18, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Section 2254(e)(2) generally bars the court from granting an evidentiary hearing if the 1

Petitioner failed to properly develop the facts in support of his claim in state court. Schriro v.

Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465, 473-74 n.1 (2007). Even where not barred by the statute, the Court has

the discretion to deny a hearing if the record refutes the allegations or otherwise precludes relief. 

Id. (citations omitted). 

Case No: 5:10-cv-00056-RS-AK
Task 

Number 

Initial 

Review Start 

Initial 

Review 

Complete Days 

Testing 

Start 

Testing 

Complete Days 

QA 

Review 

Start 

QA 

Review 

Complete Days 

Final 

Review 

Start 

Final 

Review 

Complete Days 

Letter 

Mailed Days Status 

26287 12/28/2022 12/29/2022 1 1/31/2023 2/3/2023 3 2/13/2023 2/14/2023 1 2/15/2023 1 Granted 

26456 3/23/2023 4/6/2023 14 5/3/2023 5/9/2023 6 

26461 3/23/2023 4/6/2023 14 

26645 6/22/2023 7/12/2023 20 12/18/2023 1/19/2024 32 1/18/2024 1/23/2024 5 

26662 7/12/2023 7/13/2023 1 10/31/2023 11/9/2023 11/13/2023 4 11/21/2023 11/27/2023 6 11/27/2023 0 Granted 

26761 9/6/2023 9/15/2023 9 

26774 9/21/2023 9/28/2023 7 11/28/2023 12/18/2023 20 

26775 9/21/2023 9/28/2023 7 

26790 10/4/2023 10/5/2023 1 1/4/2024 1/4/2024 0 1/12/2024 1/26/2024 14 1/26/2024 0 Granted 

26791 10/5/2023 10/20/2023 15 1/26/2024 2/1/2024 6 

26792 10/5/2023 10/20/2023 15 

26804 10/20/2023 10/25/2023 5 1/18/2024 1/18/2024 0 2/2/2024 

26909 11/29/2023 12/5/2023 6 

26948 12/14/2023 1/8/2024 25 1/26/2024 

26949 12/14/2023 1/8/2024 25 

26950 12/14/2023 1/8/2024 25 

26951 12/14/2023 1/8/2024 25 

26952 12/14/2023 1/8/2024 25 

26953 12/14/2023 1/8/2024 25 

26959 1/2/2024 1/11/2024 9 

26973 1/8/2024 1/19/2024 11 2/5/2024 

27001 1/17/2024 1/19/2024 2 

27010 1/19/2024 1/24/2024 5 

27041 

Data current as of: 2/12/2024 7:50 AM ET 

Total Number of Records: 24 

Revised: 9 March 2018 

Note: Blank dates in Testing columns may indicate that testing is not required or was performed under a prior associated project. 

Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:10cr107/MCR

FRANCISCO JAVIER GUILLIN-BONILLA

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, the plea of guilty of

the Defendant, FRANCISCO JAVIER GUILLIN-BONILLA, to Counts I, II, and III of the

Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing

as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 10th day of December 2010. 

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RAY CHRIS MOBLEY,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:11cv229/LAC/EMT

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated January11, 2012 (doc. 25). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or

failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED on this 14th day of February, 2012.

s/L.A. Collier

Lacey A. Collier

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:11-cv-00229-LC-EMT Document 26 Filed 02/14/12 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
23.1






CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements Nos. 333-20549, 333-65459, 333-38568, 333-88836, 333-129922 and
333-148139 on Form S-8, of our reports relating to the financial statements of
Powerwave Technologies, Inc. dated February 19, 2010, March 4, 2010, as to the
effects of the restatement discussed in Note 5 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
restatement discussed in Note 5, and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to the Company’s adoption of the provisions of accounting guidance now codified
as Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC)
Topic 470-20, Debt with
Conversion and Other Optionsin 2009and the Company’s
adoption of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes in 2007, and our
report relating to the effectiveness of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. internal
control over financial reporting dated February 19, 2010, March 4, 2010 as to
the effects of the material weakness identified in management’s report (which
report expresses an adverse opinion on internal control over financial
reporting), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Powerwave
Technologies, Inc. for the year ended January 3, 2010.






/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP






Costa
Mesa, California






March 4,
2010
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #11120 and #11121]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Indiana (FEMA-1732-DR), dated 11/30/2007. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         08/15/2007 through 08/27/2007. *Effective Date:*
                         11/30/2007. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/29/2008. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/01/2008.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 11/30/2007, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Lake. Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only): Indiana: Jasper, Newton, Porter. Illinois: Cook, Kankakee, Will. The Interest Rates are: PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.250Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.125Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000For Economic Injury:Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 111206 and for economic injury is 111210. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 07-6002 Filed 12-10-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
H. R. 5412 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 25 2nd 

Avenue in Brentwood, New York, as the ‘‘Army Specialist Jose L. Ruiz Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ARMY SPECIALIST JOSE L. RUIZ POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 25 2nd Avenue in Brentwood, New York, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Army Specialist Jose L. Ruiz 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Army Specialist Jose L. Ruiz Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS.

WR-87,931-01

WR-87,931-02

EX PARTE JOSE A AVILA-VEGA, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. F50546-A AND F50546-B IN THE 249TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM JOHNSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex

parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was charged in a single

indictment. He pled guilty to felony driving while intoxicated and was placed on community

supervision. He also pled guilty to three intoxication assaults and was sentenced to prison. Applicant

has filed one application challenging the intoxication assault convictions (the -01) and another

application challenging the DWI conviction (the -02). 

This Court does not have jurisdiction to consider Applicant’s habeas claims regarding the
2

DWI conviction. Applicant was placed on community supervision for this offense, and the habeas

record does not show that the community supervision has been revoked. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ART. 11.072. Applicant’s claims regarding the DWI conviction are dismissed.

As for Applicant’s claims attacking the three intoxication assault convictions for which he

was incarcerated, they are properly before this Court. TEX.CODECRIM.PROC. ART.11.07. Applicant

complains that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance and that his guilty pleas were

involuntary. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Morrow, 952 S.W.2d 530

(Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Trial counsel has provided an affidavit in response. The trial court has

entered findings and recommends denying habeas relief based on counsel’s affidavit and its own

review of the record. The trial court’s findings and recommendation are supported by the habeas

record and applicable law. Applicant also claims that the judgments of conviction are void, which

claim he fails to prove. See Ex parte Madding, 70 S.W.3d 131 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002). Applicant’s

claims regarding the three intoxication assault convictions are denied.

Filed: August 22, 2018

Do not publish
# C_2011252EN.01000101.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/1

---

2011/C 252/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 238, 13.8.2011

OJ C 238, 13.8.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 232, 6.8.2011

OJ C 226, 30.7.2011

OJ C 219, 23.7.2011

OJ C 211, 16.7.2011

OJ C 204, 9.7.2011

OJ C 194, 2.7.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 1 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 2 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 3 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 4 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 5 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 6 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 7 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 8 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 9 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 10 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 11 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 12 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 13 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 14 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 15 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 16 of 17
Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 197 Filed 07/13/12 Page 17 of 17
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 33 Filed 12/06/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 33 Filed 12/06/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 33 Filed 12/06/10 Page 3 of 3