alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5406 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5406

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 
   the annual budget submissions of the Presidents include the total 
   dollar amount requested for intelligence or intelligence related 
     activities of each element of the Government engaged in such 
                              activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2018

Mr. Welch (for himself and Mr. Sensenbrenner) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 
   the annual budget submissions of the Presidents include the total 
   dollar amount requested for intelligence or intelligence related 
     activities of each element of the Government engaged in such 
                              activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Intelligence Budget Transparency Act 
of 2018''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF EACH ELEMENT OF THE 
              GOVERNMENT.

    Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(40)(A) the total dollar amount proposed in the budget 
        for intelligence or intelligence related activities of each 
        element of the Government engaged in such activities in the 
        fiscal year for which the budget is submitted and the estimated 
        appropriation required for each of the ensuing four fiscal 
        years; and
            ``(B) as used in subparagraph (A), the term `element of the 
        Government' refers to each element of the intelligence 
        community as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security 
        Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)).''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WENDELL RAY HURLEY,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv317/LAC/CJK

SGT. WALKER, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated March 28, 2012. (Doc. 18). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation,I have determined that the

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s

failure to prosecute and failure to comply with orders of the court.

Case 3:11-cv-00317-LC-CJK Document 19 Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3 day of May, 2012.

rd

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:11cv317/LAC/CJK

Case 3:11-cv-00317-LC-CJK Document 19 Filed 05/03/12 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Musician’s Exchange (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel Van Ness,
President and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










/s/ Daniel Van
Ness


Daniel
Van Ness


President
and


Principal
Accounting Officer


August
14, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LAURYN DIANE HOKE,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11cv50/RS-CJK

DELTA AIRLINES, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Report of Parties’ Planning Meeting (Doc. 18). The attorneys

have provided no explanation why they have disregarded the guidance in the Initial

Scheduling Order regarding the discovery deadline and trial date. 

IT IS ORDERED that the parties are directed to file an amended joint report not

later than July 28, 2011, with dates consistent with a discovery deadline of

approximately March 2, 2012, and jury trial on either May 7, 2012, or May 21, 2012.

ORDERED on July 18, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00050-RS-CJK Document 19 Filed 07/18/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RAYL LYNN KELLAR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00059-MP-GRJ

L CARRERO, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL AUTHORITY, J GONZALEZ, C L WEST, JR, R

WOLF,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 8, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, which recommends that plaintiff’s complaint, Doc. 1, be dismissed without prejudice,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, for abuse of the judicial process. Plaintiff has not objected to the

recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 5, is ACCEPTED

and incorporated herein.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint, Doc. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28

U.S.C § 1915A.

3. The dismissal of this case shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1915(g).

Case 1:11-cv-00059-MP-GRJ Document 9 Filed 09/23/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

4. The Clerk is directed to TERMINATE plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, Doc. 3, and motion to amend complaint and demand for jury

trial, Doc. 6.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of September, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:11-cv-00059-MP-GRJ

Case 1:11-cv-00059-MP-GRJ Document 9 Filed 09/23/11 Page 2 of 2
# Designation of Officers of the Office of the United States Trade Representative To Act as the United States Trade 

# Memorandum for the United States Trade Representative

                        By the authority vested in me as President under the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345,                         *et seq*., it is hereby ordered that:                    

**Section 1.***Order of Succession*.                    

During any period when the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has died, resigned, or otherwise becomes unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of the United States Trade Representative, the following officers of the Office of the United States Trade Representative, in the order listed, shall perform the functions and duties of the USTR, until such time as the USTR is able to perform the functions and duties of that office; 

(a) Deputy United States Trade Representatives (stationed in Washington, D.C.; in order of their length of service as a Deputy USTR);

(b) Deputy United States Trade Representative (stationed in Geneva);

(c) General Counsel;

(d) Chief Negotiator for Agriculture;

(e) Deputy General Counsel; and

(f) Deputy Chief of Mission (stationed in Geneva).

**Sec. 2.***Exceptions*.                    

(a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as the USTR pursuant to this memorandum.

(b) No individual shall act as USTR unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998.

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this memorandum, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this memorandum in designating an acting USTR.

**Sec. 3.***Judicial Review*. This memorandum is intended to improve the internal management of the executive branch and is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.                    

**Sec. 4.***Publication*. You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

[FR Doc. 07-838

Billing code 3190-01-M
# C_2011191EN.01001101.xml

| 1.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/11

---

Special Report No 5/2011 ‘Single Payment Scheme (SPS): issues to be addressed to improve its sound financial management’

2011/C 191/07

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 5/2011 ‘Single Payment Scheme (SPS): issues to be addressed to improve its sound financial management’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 15, 2020

No. 04-20-00002-CR

IN RE Corey KING

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

On January 2, 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition 

for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

It is so ORDERED on January 15, 2020.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of January, 2020.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018CR7910, styled The State of Texas v. Corey King, pending in the 144th 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ray Olivarri presiding.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the quarterly report of One eCommerce Corporation (the Company) on form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harry Nass, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: August 5, 2009

| |  |                                       
| |  | --------------------------------------
| |  |                                       
| |  | /s/ HARRY NASS                        
| |  | Harry Nass
Principal Financial Officer

A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION,

 

 Appellant,

v.

GENARO FLORES,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00047-CV

Appeal from the

171st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2014-DCV1263)

O R D E R

The supplemental reporter’s record was due to be filed on October 28, 2017, with a 

second final extension having been issued. The Court has granted four extensions to Anita 

Garza, Official Court Reporter for the 171st District Court of El Paso County. As of this date, no 

supplemental reporter’s record has been filed and Ms. Garza has not filed an extension request.

Therefore, it is ORDERED that the trial court conduct a hearing in order to determine 

whether appellant wishes to continue the appeal, and whether appellant has been deprived of a 

supplemental reporter’s record. 

Further, the trial court shall forward its findings to the District Clerk of El Paso County, 

Texas, on or before December 5, 2017. The District Clerk shall prepare and forward a 

supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and forward the same to this 

Court on or before December 15, 2017. Further, the trial court’s reporter shall prepare, certify, 

and file the record of the trial court proceedings with this Court on or before December 15, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 15th day of November, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5341 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5341

 To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith Act of 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2018

Mr. Poe of Texas (for himself and Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reauthorize programs authorized under the Debbie Smith Act of 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Debbie Smith Reauthorization Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 2 of the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 (34 
U.S.C. 40701) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c)(3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``2014 through 
                2019'' and inserting ``2019 through 2024''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``2014 through 
                2019'' and inserting ``2019 through 2024''; and
            (2) in subsection (j), by striking ``2015 through 2019'' 
        and inserting ``2019 through 2024''.

SEC. 3. TRAINING AND EDUCATION.

    Section 303(b) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 (34 
U.S.C. 40722(b)) is amended by striking ``2015 through 2019'' and 
inserting ``2019 through 2024''.

SEC. 4. SEXUAL ASSAULT FORENSIC EXAM GRANTS.

    Section 304(d) of the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 (34 
U.S.C. 40723(d)) is amended by striking ``2015 through 2019'' and 
inserting ``2019 through 2024''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB
for  the  period  ended December 31, 2002,  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc.,  the  Managing General Partner  of  the  Partnership,
certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                           /s/ Robert P Johnson
                               Robert P. Johnson, President
                               AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                               Managing General Partner
                               March 21, 2003
# C_2010241EN.01000102.xml

| 8.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5747 — Iberia/British Airways)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 241/02

On 14 July 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5747. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5747. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
FORM
6-K








UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C. 20549





Report
of Foreign Issuer


Pursuant
to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of


the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934








Date:  January
26, 2009








TALISMAN
ENERGY INC.


Commission
File No. 1-6665


[Translation
of registrant's name into English]








2000, 888
- 3rd Street S.W.,


Calgary,
Alberta, Canada, T2P 5C5


[Address
of principal executive offices]











Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under
cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.





Form 20-F
      Form
40-F                                                                X








Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ______________.





Note: Regulation S-T Rule
101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted solely
to provide an attached annual report to security holders.





Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted
by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):_____





Note: Regulation S-T Rule
101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if submitted to
furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign private issuer
must furnish and make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the
registrant is incorporated, domiciled or legally organized (the registrant’s
“home country”), or under the rules of the home country exchange on which the
registrant’s securities are traded, as long as the report or other document is
not a press release, is not required to be and has not been distributed to the
registrant’s security holders, and, if discussing a material event, has already
been the subject of a Form 6-K submission or other Commission filing on
EDGAR.





Indicate
by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the
registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant
to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.





Yes           [   ]                      No           [√
]





If "Yes"
is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82 - .





This
Report on Form 6-K incorporates by reference the exhibit attached hereto which
was filed by Talisman Energy Inc. with the Canadian Securities Commissions (the
“Commissions”) on the date specified in the exhibit list.








Exhibit                      Title





99.1
            News
      Release – Talisman Energy Inc. Announces First Production from the Rev
      Field








SIGNATURES





Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.








TALISMAN ENERGY INC.


[Registrant]





Date:  January
26,
2009                                                                      By:     /s/
CHRISTINE D. LEE


Christine
D. Lee


Assistant
Corporate Secretary
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CARLOS RUIZ,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:11cv292/MCR/EMT

SEVERAL CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated July 27, 2011. (Doc. 11). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal (doc. 10) is GRANTED and this case

is DISMISSED without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of December, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00292-MCR-EMT Document 12 Filed 12/29/11 Page 1 of 1