alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MICHAEL FRANCIS FOUNTAIN, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv383/RV/EMT

KEVIN LESLIE BIGGS,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On October 21, 2010, Plaintiff’s

motion to proceed in forma pauperis was granted to the extent that he was permitted to proceed

without prepayment of the entire filing fee; however, he was directed to pay an initial partial filing

fee in the amount of $43.24 within thirty (30) days from the date of the order (Doc. 8). Plaintiff was

subsequently given an extension to January 21, 2011, in which to pay the partial filing fee (Doc. 11).

Plaintiff failed to respond to the order; therefore, on January 25, 2011, the court issued an order

requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty-one (21) days, why this action should not be

dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc. 13). The time for compliance with

the show cause order has now elapsed and Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee or

explained his inability to do so.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.
Page 2 of 2

At Pensacola, Florida, this 23rd day of February 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:10cv383/RV/EMT
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72388-72389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6124]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--PXI Systems Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 29, 2007, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act'', PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. 
has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney 
General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its

[[Page 72389]]

membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, AIM--USA, 
LLC, Omaha, NE has been added as a party to this venture. Also, Data 
Design Corporation, Gaithersburg, MD has withdrawn as a party to this 
venture. In addition, ASCOR has changes its name to Gigatronics, 
Fremont, CA.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. intends 
to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On November 22, 2000, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. the Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on march 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 7, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on November 7, 2007 (72 FR 62867).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-6124 Filed 12-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# C_2011125EN.01000301.xml

| 28.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 April 2011

2011/C 125/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4668 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,66 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4558 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88640 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9364 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2886 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7885 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,136 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,79 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9294 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0736 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2329 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3563 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3968 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3994 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8212 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8080 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 586,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7547 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5508 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3552 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 651,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3689 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,365 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,960 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2907 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9723 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,1850 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4668

JPY

Japanese yen

120,66

DKK

Danish krone

7,4558

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88640

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9364

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2886

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7885

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,136

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,79

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9294

RON

Romanian leu

4,0736

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2329

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3563

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3968

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3994

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8212

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8080

KRW

South Korean won

1 586,19

ZAR

South African rand

9,7547

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5508

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3552

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 651,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3689

PHP

Philippine peso

63,365

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6500

THB

Thai baht

43,960

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2907

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9723

INR

Indian rupee

65,1850

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
FIRST AMENDMENT

This First Amendment ("Amendment No. 1") is dated March 29, 2004 and is the
first  amendment to the CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT dated November 3, 2003
which was among and between Stanton, Walker & Company and GK Intelligent
Systems, Inc.

It is hereby agreed that paragraph 7 shall be amended:

From:
-----

7.  Term/Termination.  This Agreement is for a term of six (6) months ending
May 2, 2004.

To:
---

7. Term/Termination. This Agreement is for a term of eighteen (18) months
ending May 1, 2005

Further Agreement

As consideration for Consultant entering into this Second Amendment to the
Agreement, Client agrees to cause shares of its common stock (the "Additional
Consideration"), par value $.001 per share, to be issued to Richard P. Stanton
and Richard H. Walker, affiliates of Stanton, Walker & Company. The total
number of shares shall be 2,200,000 and shall be divided in two and issued in
equal quantities of 1,100,000 shares to Richard P. Stanton and to Richard H.
Walker. When issued, said shares shall be free trading shares, registered with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on its Form S-8 or similar
registration. The registration and issuance of the 2,200,000 shares shall take
place no later than April 7, 2004. The consultant has the right to request up
to an additional 1,200,000 shares within six months of the execution of this
amendment for delivery within five (5) business days of receipt of written
notice. The additional shares are deemed earned when requested. If for any
reason the Client fails to deliver these additional shares within five (5)
business days, then the Consulting Agreement shall immediately terminate with
no further obligation existing by and between Client and Consultant. All costs
in connection therewith shall be borne by client.

It is hereby agreed that Paragraph 1.4 a ii shall be amended:

From:
-----

ii.  Amount and Payment of Consultant's Fee For Merger/Acquisition.

For a merger/acquisition entered into by Client as a result of the efforts of,
or an introduction by Consultant during the term of this Agreement, Client
shall pay Consultant, two and a half percent (2.5%) of the total value of the
transaction.

To:
---

ii.  Amount and Payment of Consultant's Fee For Merger/Acquisition.

For a merger/acquisition entered into by Client as a result of the efforts of,
or an introduction by Consultant during the term of this Agreement, Client
shall pay Consultant, ten percent  (10%) of the total value of the
transaction.

All other terms and conditions shall remain the same.



         * S I G N A T U R E   P A G E   F O L L O W S*



CLIENT: GK INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, INC. (GKIG)
-------------------------------------------


/s/ Gary F. Kimmons
___________________________________________

        President , CEO
Title: __________________________________

Date: March 29, 2004


CONSULTANT: STANTON, WALKER & COMPANY
-------------------------------------
     /s/ Richard P. Stanton
By: _____________________________________
    Richard P. Stanton
    Its Managing Director

Date: March 29, 2004
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED J EREMY RYAN HAGAN , A ppellant ,
v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2132 LT Case No s

. 2014

- CF -0 2973 -A-O 2014

- CF

- 03173 -A-O 2014

- CF

- 0 10624

- A

- O STATE OF F LORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision f iled November 1, 202 2 3.850 Appeal f rom t he Circuit C ourt for Orange County , Luis Fernando Caldero n , J udge. Jeremy Ryan H agan, M onticello, pr o se. Ashley Moody, A ttorney General, T allahassee, and D ouglas T

. S quire, A ssistant A ttorney General, D aytona Beach, f or A ppellee.

PER CURIAM. A FFIRMED.

W ALLIS , EDWARDS and HARRIS , JJ., concur.
Exhibit 11.1

          Computation of Historical Net Income (loss) Per Common Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Year Ended April 30,
                                                       1995          1996          1997
                                                       ----          ----          ----

<S> <C>        
          Net income                                $1,256,587    $  656,870    $1,945,260
                                                    ==========    ==========    ==========

          Weighted average number of shares
          outstanding                                              4,000,000     5,858,601
          Add:
              Shares issuable upon conversion of
                Series A Redeemable Convertible
                Preferred Stock                                      992,061
                                                                                                               
              Shares issuable from the assumed exercise
                of options as determined by the     
                application of the treasury stock method             611,144       598,250
                                                                  ----------    ----------
                                                                   5,603,205     6,456,851
                                                                  ==========    ==========
          Net income per common share                             $     0.12    $     0.30
                                                                  ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
                                                        
                                                          

The above computations include all common equivalent shares issued within the 12
months preceding the filing date as if they were outstanding for all periods
presented (using the treasury stock method) and the as if converted method with
regards to the Series A redeemable convertible preferred stock. Earnings per
share for fiscal 1995 has not been presented since such amounts are not deemed
meaningful due to the significant change in the Company's capital structure that
occurred in connection with the public offering.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILLIAM R MEYERS, III, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00122-MP-CAS

EDWIN G BUSS, MICHAEL D CREWS, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

KENNETH S TUCKER, 

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated September 23, 2013. (Doc. 51). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Instead of objecting, however,

petitioner filed a notice of inquiry asking about the status of his case, as if he had not received

the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk then found proof that the Report and

Recommendation had indeed been sent to him and not returned as undeliverable. The Court set

out this proof in the order at Doc. 53, and directed petitioner to show cause why he should be

allowed to file objections out of time. Petitioner has not responded and the time for doing so has

passed. The Court will therefore consider the Report and Recommendation as not objected to. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report

and Recommendation should be adopted. The court agrees with the state court and the

Magistrate Judge that there was no deficient performance in refusing to insist on a speedy trial,

as to do so would have been to proceed without being ready. Also, the supposed advantage of
Page 2 of 2

going early – catching the state without the victim witness – was actually not likely to occur

according to the evidence at the evidentiary hearing. 

As to ground 2, the Court agrees with the state court and the Magistrate Judge that

neither of the statements made during closing argument represented impermissible shifting of the

burden of persuasion to the defense. Also, defense counsel's tactical decision to not object

during closing arguments was a reasonable one under the circumstances. 

Finally, the Court agrees with the state court and the Magistrate Judge that moving to

continue sentencing to introduce medical evidence would not have lessened petitioner's sentence

and could have caused his scoresheet – which was lower than would be expected – to be

rescored, resulting in a higher range. Also, the evidence showed that counsel was not aware of

the medical conditions at the time of sentencing, so he could not have introduced evidence he

was not aware of.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order. 

2. The § 2254 petition (Doc. 1) is DENIED. To the extent Petitioner has filed a

motion to expedite, that motion (Doc. 49), as well as the motion for clarification

(Doc. 48), are both DENIED as moot. A certificate of appealability is DENIED

and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of January, 2014

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 4:11-cv-00122-MP-CAS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5395 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5395

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 116 Main Street in Dansville, New York, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
           Alexandria Gleason-Morrow Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT ALEXANDRIA GLEASON-MORROW POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 116 Main Street in Dansville, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Staff Sergeant Alexandria Gleason-Morrow Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Staff 
Sergeant Alexandria Gleason-Morrow Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 29, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5395

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 116 Main Street in Dansville, New York, as the ``Staff Sergeant 
           Alexandria Gleason-Morrow Post Office Building''.
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-700]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: 11:30 a.m., Thursday, February 15, 2007.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Closed.

Matters to Be Considered: 1. Administrative Action under Section 208 of 
the Federal Credit Union Act. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (8), 
(9)(A)(ii), and (B).

For Further Information Contact: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-700 Filed 2-12-07; 12:31 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
EXHIBIT  32.01

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Colony  Energy, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"),
the  undersigned,  in  the  capacities  and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  his  knowledge:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  November  18,  2008                       /s/  Kent  E.  Lovelace,  Jr.
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Kent  E.  Lovelace,  Jr.,
                                                  Chief  Executive  Officer
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Genesis Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael Handelman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 22, 2011
By:
/s/ Michael HandelmanMichael HandelmanChief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011227EN.01000401.xml

| 2.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

1 August 2011

2011/C 227/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4415 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4501 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87955 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0070 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1270 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,6935 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,160 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9828 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2215 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4116 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3041 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3713 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2310 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6348 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7299 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 511,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6076 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2746 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4300 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 193,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2373 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,449 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,7390 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,827 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2296 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7930 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,5340 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4415

JPY

Japanese yen

110,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4501

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87955

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0070

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1270

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,6935

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,160

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9828

RON

Romanian leu

4,2215

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4116

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3041

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3713

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2310

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6348

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7299

KRW

South Korean won

1 511,39

ZAR

South African rand

9,6076

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2746

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4300

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 193,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2373

PHP

Philippine peso

60,449

RUB

Russian rouble

39,7390

THB

Thai baht

42,827

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2296

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7930

INR

Indian rupee

63,5340

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---