alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CA2009107EN.01000101.xml

| 9.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 107/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 107/1

---

RESERVE LISTS
   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

1

OPEN COMPETITIONS

OPEN COMPETITIONS

(2009/C 107 A/01)

EPSO/AD/105/07 — Heads of unit (AD 9) having Bulgarian as their main language

| BARDARSKA | Rusana |
| --- | --- |
| CHAKALOVA-SIDI | Miroslava |
| DIMOVA | Daniela |
| DUKOVA (PANKOVA) | Katia |
| IOVTCHEVA | Albena Lyubomirova |
| PETROVA-TOTOMANOVA | Irena |
| STAMTCHEVA (ANDREEVA) | Violina |
| TELKEDJIYSKA | Tatiana |

BARDARSKA

Rusana

CHAKALOVA-SIDI

Miroslava

DIMOVA

Daniela

DUKOVA (PANKOVA)

Katia

IOVTCHEVA

Albena Lyubomirova

PETROVA-TOTOMANOVA

Irena

STAMTCHEVA (ANDREEVA)

Violina

TELKEDJIYSKA

Tatiana

EPSO/AD/105/07 — Heads of unit (AD 12) having Bulgarian as their main language

| KARAKASHOV | Vladimir |
| --- | --- |
| STOICHEVA-PANTALEEVA | Maria |

KARAKASHOV

Vladimir

STOICHEVA-PANTALEEVA

Maria

EPSO/AD/106/07 — Heads of unit (AD 9) having Romanian as their main language

| CERNAT | Geanina |
| --- | --- |
| NECSA | Daniel |
| NEGRU | Margareta Felicia |

CERNAT

Geanina

NECSA

Daniel

NEGRU

Margareta Felicia

EPSO/AD/106/07 — Heads of unit (AD 12) having Romanian as their main language

| LASCU | Gheorghe |
| --- | --- |
| VARZARU | Gabriela Georgeta |

LASCU

Gheorghe

VARZARU

Gabriela Georgeta

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2010 and may be extended.

31 December 2010

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5242 

AN ACT 

To require the Attorney General and the Secretary of Education to conduct a survey of all public schools to determine the number of school resource officers at such 

schools. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5242 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Resource Offi3 cer Assessment Act of 2018’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SURVEY OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS. 

5 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

6 of this Act, the Attorney General and the Secretary of 

7 Education shall jointly conduct and submit to Congress, 

8 a survey of the assignment of school resource officers at 

9 public elementary schools and secondary schools, which 

10 shall include, with respect to each such school that chose 

11 to respond to such survey, a determination of whether— 

12 (1) on or after January 1, 2018, such a school 

13 has been assigned a school resource officer; and 

14 (2) in the case of a school that has been as15 signed such an officer— 

16 (A) the number of such assignments; and 

17 (B) whether each such assignment is on a 

18 full-time or part-time basis. 

19 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

20 In this Act: 

21 (1) ESEA TERMS.—The terms ‘‘elementary 

22 school’’ and ‘‘secondary school’’ have the meanings 

23 given the terms in section 8101 of the Elementary 

24 and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 

25 7801). 
3 

•HR 5242 EH

1 (2) SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER.—The term 

2 ‘‘school resource officer’’ has the meaning given the 

3 term in section 1709(4) of the Omnibus Crime Con4 trol and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 

5 10389(4)). 

Passed the House of Representatives May 15, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5242 

AN ACT 

To require the Attorney General and the Secretary 

source officers at such schools. schools to determine the number of school reof Education to conduct a survey of all public
#### STATE v. HAIGLER

No. 133 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 501.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 July 1972.
EXHIBIT 10.23

ADDENDUM I TO LICENSE AGREEMENT

This agreement (hereinafter "Addendum I") is between Digital Voice Systems, Inc. a corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts, with a principal office at One Van de Graaff Drive, Burlington, MA 01803 (hereinafter called "DVSI") and E. F. Johnson Company a company incorporated under the laws
of the state of Minnesota, with a principal office at 299 Johnson Avenue, Waseca, Minnesota 56093 (hereinafter called "Licensee").

This
agreement is an addendum to the license agreement between DVSI and E. F. Johnson Company dated May 15, 1995 (hereinafter the "LICENSE AGREEMENT"). Under the terms of the
LICENSE AGREEMENT, Licensee has licensed certain proprietary IMBE Vocoder Technology and Software owned by DVSI for use in APCO Project 25 hardware products. Licensee desires additional
Software for APCO Project 25 which is capable of real-time implementation of such Technology on a Texas Instruments TMS320C54X processor (hereinafter the "TMS320C54X Software"). The
TMS320C54X Software comprises Object Code but not Source Code. DVSI is willing to deliver such TMS320C54X Software to Licensee, and to extend the license granted in the LICENSE AGREEMENT to the
TMS320C54X Software under the terms and conditions described herein.

This
Addendum I becomes effective on the date when it has been signed by both parties (hereinafter the "Effective Date").

ADDENDUM I

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein, the parties agree as follows:

1.    DELIVERY OF THE SOFTWARE



2.    ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS AND RECORDS



1

---



3.    ACCEPTANCE AND TERMINATION



4.    MISCELLANEOUS



2

---





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set their hands and seals and duly execute this Addendum I as of the last day and year written below.

|DIGITAL VOICE SYSTEMS, INC. |  | LICENSEE           
|--------------------------- |  | -------------------
|BY:                         |  | /s/JOHN C. HARDWICK
|Typed Name:                 |  | John C. Hardwick   
|Title:                      |  | President          
|Date:                       |  |                    

3

---

QuickLinks
An N95 respira 

a surgical mas 

same protecti 

I can decorate 

N95 respirator 

There's no wa'J 

if an N95 respi 

actually NIOSH 

FACT: 

A NIOSH-approved N95 respirator forms a 

seal against the user's face, preventing 

particle penetration around the edges. The 

filter has passed NIOSH tests to determine 

that it protects against at least 95% of 

airborne particles. 

Because surgical masks do not seal against 

the face and the filters have not been tested, 

the same level of protection against airborne 

particles cannot be guaranteed. 

FACT: 

Any alteration of the N95 will void 

the NIOSH approval because respirator can 

no longer be guaranteed to provide the 

necessary level of protection. 

FACT: 

NPPTL Homepage 

A to Z Index 

For Respirator Users 

For Respirator 

Manufacturers 

Protective ClothinQ and 

Ensembles 

Protective Technology 

Program at NIOSH 

Approved Particulate 

Filtering Facepiece 

Respirators 

Certified Equipment List 

(CEL) 

Respirator User Notices 

Contact NPPn 

A list of approved N95 respirators 

is updated every month. Find it at 

Knowits.niosh.gov under the 

"Approved Particulate Filtering 

Facepiece Respirators" tab.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy, LLC (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Karen L. Kroymann, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Karen L. Kroymann


Controller and Principal Financial Officer


Dated: May 11, 2010




















29
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  §906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Glengarry Holdings Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A, as amended, for the period ending
June 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Caney, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|/s/DAVID CANEYDavid Caney Chairman and Chief Executive
OfficerSeptember 12, 2002 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Arrin Background, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
R. Willard, the Treasurer and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

     1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the three month
          period ended March 31, 2008 (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Dated: May 8, 2008

                                      /s/ William R. Willard
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      William R. Willard
                                      Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
IB 

Union Calendar No. 795 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5319 

[Report No. 115–1016, Part I] 

To transfer Coast Guard property in the Town of Jupiter Island, Florida, 

for inclusion in Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2018 

Mr. MAST (for himself, Mr. HASTINGS, and Mr. DEUTCH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

NOVEMBER 13, 2018 

Reported from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

NOVEMBER 13, 2018 

Committee on Natural Resources discharged; committed to the Committee of 

the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5319 RH

A BILL 

To transfer Coast Guard property in the Town of Jupiter 

Island, Florida, for inclusion in Hobe Sound National 

Wildlife Refuge. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5319 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF COAST GUARD PROPERTY IN JU4 PITER ISLAND, FLORIDA, FOR INCLUSION IN 

5 HOBE SOUND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. 

6 (a) TRANSFER.—Administrative jurisdiction over the 

7 property described in subsection (b) is transferred to the 

8 Secretary of the Interior. 

9 (b) PROPERTY DESCRIBED.—The property referred 

10 to in subsection (a) is real property administered by the 

11 Coast Guard in the Town of Jupiter Island, Florida, com12 prising Parcel #35–38–42–004–000–02590–6 (Bon Air 

13 Beach lots 259 and 260 located at 83 North Beach Road) 

14 and Parcel #35–38–42–004–000–02610–2 (Bon Air 

15 Beach lots 261 to 267), including any improvements 

16 thereon that are not authorized or required by another 

17 provision of law to be conveyed to another person. 

18 (c) ADMINISTRATION.—The property described in 

19 subsection (b) is included in Hobe Sound National Wildlife 

20 Refuge, and shall be administered by the Secretary of the 

21 Interior acting through the United States Fish and Wild22 life Service. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 795 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5319 

[Report No. 115–1016, Part I] 

A BILL 

To transfer Coast Guard property in the Town of 

Sound National Wildlife Refuge. Jupiter Island, Florida, for inclusion in Hobe 

NOVEMBER 13, 2018 

Reported from the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

NOVEMBER 13, 2018 

Committee on Natural Resources discharged; committed 

the Union and ordered to be printed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 4.17.1**

***Ministry of The Russian Federation for Telecommunications and Informatization***

**Amendment No. 1****to License No. 17938 (registration series A 017202)****dated April 26, 2001**

Legal address on the title page of the License shall read as follows:

“127083, Moscow, Ul. 8 Marta, 10, bldg. 14.”

 

| **First Deputy Minister****of the Russian Federation for****Telecommunications and****Informatization** |   | [Signature]       |   | Yu.A. Pavlenko     |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|--------|--------------------|
|                                                                                                    |   |              |   |               |
|                                                                                                    |   |              |   | July 3, 2002       |
|                                                                                                    |   |              |   |               |
| **Deputy Head of the Department****of the Organization****of Licensing Activity**                       |   | [Signature][Seal] |   | B.V. Vorobyov |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PATRICIA B. GRADY, AS EXECUTRIX

AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF STEPHEN P. GRADY,

Petitioner

v.

AERO

- TECH SERVICES, INC. D/B/A

AERO

- TECH SERVICES AND ZACH HURST & DAVID PEACHEY,
INDIVIDUALLY,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 158 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of August, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
----

| (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: March 30, 2011 | /s/ Paul Van Ostenbridge              |   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                  | Paul Van Ostenbridge                  |   |
|                  | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                  |                                  |   |
|                  |                                  |   |
| Dated: March 30, 2011 | /s/ Claire M. Chadwick                |   |
|                  | Claire M. Chadwick                    |   |
|                  | Senior Vice President and             |   |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer               |   |

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TAHIR ANSARI, individually, and JASMINE ANSARI, individually,

Appellants,

v.

FLORIDA ASSET RESOLUTION GROUP, LLC,

as assignee for Bank Atlantic,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3078

[October 31, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 10-

003782.

Michael A. Tessitore and Jason P. Del Rosso of Moran Kidd Lyons 

Johnson Garcia, P.A., Orlando, for appellants.

Eric B. Zwiebel of Emanuel & Zwiebel, PLLC, Plantation, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

REGINALD CHANDLER, 

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv503-MP/CAS

ERIC HOLDER, et al., 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO TRANSFER § 2241 PETITION

Petitioner Reginald Chandler has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in this

Court, challenging his conviction and sentence out of this district, in Case No. 4:06cr22-

RH/WCS. Doc. 1. This Court directed Petitioner to show cause as to whether he

wished to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 or 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Doc. 5. 

Petitioner filed a response asserting that § 2255 is inadequate and ineffective, and he

wished to proceed under § 2241 and the savings clause. Doc. 7. Petitioner is

incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Miami, Florida. Doc. 1. 

Jurisdiction for a § 2241 petition lies only in the district of confinement, in this

case the Southern District of Florida. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 443

(2004); Garcia v. Warden, 470 F. App’x 735 (11th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, this Court

Case 4:10-cv-00503-MP-CAS Document 17 Filed 08/22/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

does not have jurisdiction to address the merits of the § 2241 petition. See Garcia, 470

F. App’x at 735. 

It is therefore respectfully RECOMMENDED that the case file be

TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida,

Miami Division, for all further proceedings.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on August 22, 2012.

 S/ Charles A. Stampelos 

CHARLES A. STAMPELOS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES

Within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation, a party may

serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. A party may

respond to another party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to

file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv503-MP/CAS

Case 4:10-cv-00503-MP-CAS Document 17 Filed 08/22/12 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Reid Stone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Reid Stone Reid Stone Title: Chief Financial Officer   August 18, 2009
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ANDY VERTOONT

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-128-MP-GRJ

U.S. DEP’T OF HOMELAND SECURITY,

U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS

ENFORCEMENT

Respondent.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This case is before the Court on Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Doc. 1. Petitioner, a Belgian citizen, is in the custody of 1

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement pursuant to a final order of removal issued

by the Board of Immigration Appeals on May 31, 2011. The Petition reflects that at the

time it was filed Petitioner was confined in the Baker County Jail, within the jurisdiction of

the Middle District of Florida. However, a review of the ICE online detainee locator

reflects that Petitioner is currently confined at Krome North SPC, Miami, Florida, within

the jurisdiction of the Southern District of Florida. 

To the extent that Petitioner challenges his detention pending removal, his

petition must be filed in the district of confinement. Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426,

443 (2004). Because it is unclear whether Petitioner is confined in the Middle District or

Southern District, the Court recommends dismissal without prejudice rather than

 Petitioner has also filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus with the Middle 1

District of Florida, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, challenging his detention by DHS/ICE. 

The Middle District issued an order of transfer in its case, 3:11-cv-63-J-37TEM, on June

28, 2011, transferring the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11 Circuit. th

Case 1:11-cv-00128-MP-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/05/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

transfer.

To the extent that Petitioner challenges the final order of removal, it is not

appropriate for this Court to address the removal issue. The federal circuit courts of

appeal have exclusive jurisdiction to review final immigration orders of removal or

deportation. REAL ID Act of 2005, Pub. L. No. 109-13, 119 Stat. 231, 310-11 (2005); 8

U.S.C. § 1252.

Conclusion

For the foregoing reasons it is respectfully RECOMMENDED this cause be

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IN CHAMBERS this 5 day of July, 2011. th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 14

days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections

limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No: 1:11cv128-MP-GRJ

Case 1:11-cv-00128-MP-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/05/11 Page 2 of 2