alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:11-cr-00026-MCR Document 23 Filed 08/16/11 Page 1 of 6Case 3:11-cr-00026-MCR Document 23 Filed 08/16/11 Page 2 of 6Case 3:11-cr-00026-MCR Document 23 Filed 08/16/11 Page 3 of 6Case 3:11-cr-00026-MCR Document 23 Filed 08/16/11 Page 4 of 6Case 3:11-cr-00026-MCR Document 23 Filed 08/16/11 Page 5 of 6Case 3:11-cr-00026-MCR Document 23 Filed 08/16/11 Page 6 of 6
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5450 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5450

   To increase the access of small farmers in Puerto Rico to Federal 
             agriculture programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 10, 2018

   Mr. Soto introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural 
 Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To increase the access of small farmers in Puerto Rico to Federal 
             agriculture programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASING THE ACCESS OF SMALL FARMERS IN PUERTO RICO WHO 
              GROW SPECIALTY CROPS TO FEDERAL AGRICULTURAL LOAN 
              PROGRAMS.

    The Secretary of Agriculture, through the Office of Advocacy and 
Outreach, shall increase the access of small farmers who grow specialty 
crops (as defined in section 101 of the Specialty Crops Competitiveness 
Act of 2004) in Puerto Rico to loans under the following programs:
            (1) All microloan programs under the Consolidated Farm and 
        Rural Development Act.
            (2) All programs for socially disadvantaged farmers and 
        ranchers under the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act.
            (3) All programs for beginning farmers under the 
        Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act.
            (4) The emergency loan program under subtitle C of the 
        Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act.

SEC. 2. SMALL FARMING ON FEDERAL LANDS.

    The Secretary of the Interior shall develop a program to allow 
small farmers to farm on Federal land in Puerto Rico if the Secretary 
determines that--
            (1) the Federal land is not environmentally sensitive;
            (2) farming on the Federal land will not harm endangered 
        native species or natural habitats; and
            (3) the Federal land is suitable for such farming.

SEC. 3. SMALL FARMER TRAINING PROGRAM.

    The Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Director of the 
Office of Advocacy and Outreach, shall carry out a training program to 
teach best farming practices to small farmers in Puerto Rico.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHARLES RANDALL HARRISON,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:10cv451/RV/MD 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

_____________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated November 12, 2010. The petitioner previously has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an

objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus under § 2241 (doc. 1) is

summarily denied.

 DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of December, 2010.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Jeff Ritchie, certify that:





(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Independent Film Development Corporation;





(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and





(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   May 19, 2008





/s/ Jeff Ritchie

Jeff Ritchie

Chief Executive Officer, and Director
Page 1 of 2

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ALVIN C. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:10cv74/MCR/MD

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendants.

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon plaintiff filing a civil rights complaint under 42

U.S.C. § 1983 in the Southern District of Florida. (Doc. 1). Thereafter, the action was

transferred to this court. (Doc. 5).

Plaintiff failed to file his complaint on the court form. Local Rule 5.1(J) for the

Northern District of Florida states that the court will not accept for consideration a pro se

complaint filed under section 1983 unless the appropriate complaint form is completed. 

Plaintiff will therefore be required to file an amended complaint. To amend his complaint,

plaintiff should completely fill out a civil rights complaint form, marking it "Amended

Complaint." Plaintiff is advised that the amended complaint must contain all of his

allegations, and it should not in any way refer to the original complaint. Once an amended

complaint is filed, all earlier complaints are disregarded. Local Rule 15.1, Northern District

of Florida.

Additionally, plaintiff neither paid the $350.00 filing fee nor applied for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff’s case cannot proceed until he either pays the filing

fee or files a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. A complete application

includes a motion with supporting affidavit, a prisoner consent form and a financial

certificate with attachments (a printout of the transactions in plaintiff’s inmate trust account
Page 2 of 2

for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk is directed to send plaintiff a § 1983 complaint form and a form

application to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number should be written on the

forms. 

2. Within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an

amended complaint which shall be typed or clearly written, and submitted on the court

form.

3. Within the same time period, plaintiff shall either submit payment in the amount

of $350.00, or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis.

4. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order as instructed will result in a

recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the

court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23 day of March, 2010.

rd

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv74/MCR/MD
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JAMES BERNARD CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 5:11cv70-SPM/EMT

MR. ELLIS, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s Order,

Report and Recommendation dated June 9, 2011, (doc. 18), recommending

dismissal of Plaintiff’s complaint under the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. §

1915(g). Plaintiff has filed requests for extensions of time to respond (docs. 22,

23, and 24). The requests for extension of time will be denied because Plaintiff

has already had adequate time to respond, and granting the requests would be

futile.

As a three-striker, Plaintiff must demonstrate that he is in imminent danger

of serious physical injury to proceed without payment of the filing fee. Plaintiff

cannot meet this requirement because his complaint concerns cold temperatures

he experienced while housed in disciplinary confinement at Gulf Correctional

Case 5:11-cv-00070-SPM-EMT Document 25 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Institution. Plaintiff has since been moved to Santa Rosa Correctional Institution. 

A claim by a prisoner that he faced a past imminent danger is insufficient to

satisfy the imminent danger requirement when the prisoner is no longer in the

dangerous situation. Redberry v. Butler. 185 F.3d 1189, 1193 (11th Cir. 1999).

In accordance with Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have

determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly,

it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 18) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motions for extension of time (docs. 22, 23, and 24) are

denied.

3. This case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), without

prejudice to Plaintiff’s opportunity to refile with full payment of the filing fee.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 5:11cv70-SPM/EMT

Case 5:11-cv-00070-SPM-EMT Document 25 Filed 07/12/11 Page 2 of 2
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5301 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs from requiring a surviving spouse of a veteran to return certain 

payments for a month in which the veteran dies. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2018 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Mr. JONES, Mr. TURNER, Mr. WITTMAN, Ms. 

SHEA-PORTER, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. COLE, Mr. PETERSON, Mr. 

PEARCE, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. 

GABBARD, Ms. ROSEN, Ms. PINGREE, Ms. ESTY of Connecticut, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KILMER, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. CAPUANO, and Mrs. ROBY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from requiring a surviving 

spouse of a veteran to return certain payments for a 

month in which the veteran dies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5301 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON REQUIREMENT FOR SUR2 VIVING SPOUSE TO RETURN CERTAIN PAY3 MENTS BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS AF4 FAIRS. 

5 (a) SURVIVING SPOUSE PAYMENT.—Section 5310 of 

6 title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(c) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN CHECKS AND PAY9 MENTS.—In the case of a surviving spouse who was a de10 pendent with respect to whom additional compensation for 

11 dependents was payable under section 1115 of this title, 

12 or additional pension as a married veteran under chapter 

13 15, as of the date of the veteran’s death, if a check or 

14 other payment issued to the veteran as a benefit payment 

15 under either such chapter for the month in which death 

16 occurs is negotiated, deposited, or otherwise accessed by 

17 the surviving spouse— 

18 ‘‘(1) the check or payment shall be considered 

19 to be the benefit payable to the surviving spouse 

20 under subsection (a)(1), to the extent that the check 

21 or payment equals the amount which would other22 wise be payable under such subsection; and 

23 ‘‘(2) the Secretary may not require the sur24 viving spouse to return the check or payment.’’. 

25 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

26 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5301 IH

1 of this Act and shall apply with respect to deaths that 

2 occur on or after that date. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMP Holding Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stephen S. Burns, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1)           The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  August 16, 2010
/s/ Stephen S. BurnsStephen S. Burns,Chief Executive and Financial Officer

(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Credit Union Administration

# Time and Date:

11:30 a.m., Thursday, February 15, 2007.

# Place:

Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to Be Considered:

1.   Administrative Action under Section 208 of the Federal Credit Union Act. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (8), (9)(A)(ii), and (B).

# For Further Information Contact:

Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,

Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 07-700 Filed 2-12-07; 12:31 pm]

BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
Page 1 of 3

Case No. 5:11cv39-RH/EMT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LEROY E. TAYLOR,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv39-RH/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING THE PETITION AND

DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

This petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before 

the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF No. 38, and 

the objections, ECF No. 42. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the 

objections. The report and recommendation is correct and is adopted as the court’s 

opinion.

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires a district court to 

“issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to 

the applicant.” Under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability may 

issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a 

Case 5:11-cv-00039-RH-EMT Document 43 Filed 10/10/12 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 5:11cv39-RH/EMT

constitutional right.” See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-38 (2003); 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000); Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 

893 n.4 (1983); see also Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 402-13 (2000) (setting 

out the standards applicable to a § 2254 petition on the merits). As the Court said 

in Slack:

 To obtain a COA under § 2253(c), a habeas prisoner must make a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a 

demonstration that, under Barefoot, includes showing that reasonable 

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition 

should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues 

presented were “ ‘adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed 

further.’ ” 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 483-84 (quoting Barefoot, 463 U.S. at 893 n.4). Further, in 

order to obtain a certificate of appealability when dismissal is based on procedural 

grounds, a petitioner must show, “at least, that jurists of reason would find it 

debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court 

was correct in its procedural ruling.” Id. at 484. 

The petitioner has not made the required showing. 

For these reasons,

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED.

Case 5:11-cv-00039-RH-EMT Document 43 Filed 10/10/12 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 5:11cv39-RH/EMT

2. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The petition is DENIED with 

prejudice.” 

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on October 10, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-00039-RH-EMT Document 43 Filed 10/10/12 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ANDREW J. RAINES,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:11cv34/RS-CJK

PINNACLE AIRLINES, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Report of Mediator (Doc. 30). Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2(D), it is

ordered:

1. This case is dismissed from the active docket of the court.

2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this Order, to

amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative

purposes, and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is directed to

close the case in its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on August 30, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00034-RS-CJK Document 31 Filed 08/30/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011239EN.01000401.xml

| 17.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 August 2011

2011/C 239/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4360 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4495 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87850 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2498 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1195 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8650 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,384 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,18 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1595 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2758 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5604 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3790 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4165 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1919 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7338 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7297 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 541,44 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,3136 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1657 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4610 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 248,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2843 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,881 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,3695 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,908 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3010 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6627 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,1800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4360

JPY

Japanese yen

110,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4495

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87850

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2498

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1195

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8650

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,384

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,18

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1595

RON

Romanian leu

4,2758

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5604

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3790

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4165

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1919

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7338

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7297

KRW

South Korean won

1 541,44

ZAR

South African rand

10,3136

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1657

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4610

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 248,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2843

PHP

Philippine peso

60,881

RUB

Russian rouble

41,3695

THB

Thai baht

42,908

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3010

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6627

INR

Indian rupee

65,1800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---