alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011004EN.01000101.xml

| 7.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5983 — Tyco Electronics/ADC Telecommunications)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 4/01

On 6 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5983. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5983. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Forever Valuable Collectibles, Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Jodi Stevens, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.   Date: May 17, 2010By:/s/ Jodi StevensJodi StevensChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. RAY

No. 87 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 646.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 May 1972.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:11cr03-SPM

DONALD IVORY,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY PLEA

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to

the Court’s consideration of any Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

11(e)(2), the plea of guilty of the defendant, DONALD IVORY, to Counts One and

Five of the indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this

Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of February, 2011. 

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DERREL THOMAS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No: 4:11-cv-46-MP-GRJ

JORAM PEREZ,

OFFICER BRADSHAW, and

OFFICER BOCCACCIO,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Bradshaw’s Motion For Extension

Of Time To Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint. (Doc. 29.) Defendant

Bradshaw seeks an extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to the amended

complaint (Doc. 17) until February 28, 2012. Defendant Boccaccio, one of the two

other Defendants in this case, was recently granted an extension to answer or

otherwise respond to the amended complaint until February 28, 2012. (Doc. 26.)

Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. Defendant Bradshaw’s Motion For Extension Of Time To Answer or

Otherwise Respond to Complaint (Doc. 29) is GRANTED. 

2. Defendant Bradshaw shall answer or otherwise respond to the amended

complaint on or before February 28, 2012.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12 day of January 2012. th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00046-MP-GRJ Document 32 Filed 01/12/12 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DAVID KATZ,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-274/RS-MD

FDIC, as Receiver for PEOPLE’S

FIRST COMMUNITY BANK, 

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8). Plaintiff has failed to 

answer.

1

 

Defendant argues that Plaintiff has not met the amount in controversy requirement 

for diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (a). While this may be true, Plaintiff has 

asserted that his cause of action is one arising under the laws of the United States, 28 

U.S.C. § 1331. 

Plaintiff cites 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d) (6) as the basis for this Court’s jurisdiction. In 

relevant part, Section 1821 (d) (6) provides that following the rejection of a claim by the 

FDIC, as receiver, a “claimant may . . . file suit on such claim . . . in the district or 

territorial court of the United States for the district within which the depository 

institution's principal place of business is located.” Our Circuit has recently noted that 

 

1 Plaintiff is reminded that “failure to file a responsive memorandum may be sufficient cause to 

grant the motion.” N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1 (C). 
“Congress contemplated the reality that the FDIC may err in its determination of 

receivership claims and provided all claimants with the remedy of de novo review in 

federal court of the FDIC's claims determination.” Bank of Am. Nat'l Ass'n v. Colonial 

Bank, 604 F.3d 1239, 1244 (11th Cir. 2010). 

Without assessing whether Plaintiff has complied with any required procedural 

prerequisites, the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) is DENIED. 

ORDERED on January 7, 2011

/S/ Richard Smoak

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2009301EN.01000302.xml

| 11.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5715 — Leisure Park Holdings/Criteria Caixa Corp/Activos Port Aventura)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 301/05

On 2 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5715. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5715. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 32 (Friday, February 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 7621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-721]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Availability for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive 
Licensing of U.S. Patent Application Concerning Inducing and Sealing 
Cracks in Containment Vessels

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 37 CFR 404.6 and 404.7, announcement is 
made of the availability of licensing of the invention set forth in 
U.S. Patent Application No. 11/460,593 entitled ``Method of Inducing 
and Sealing Cracks in Vessels,'' filed on July 27, 2006. The United 
States Government, as represented by the Secretary of the Army, has 
rights in this invention.

ADDRESSES: Office of Research and Technology Applications, SDMC-RDTC-
TDL (Ms. Susan D. McRae), Bldg. 5220, Von Braun Complex, Redstone 
Arsenal, AL 35898.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Joan Gilsdorf, Patent Attorney, e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#87ede8e6e9a9e0eeebf4e3e8f5e1c7f4eae3e4a9e6f5eafea9eaeeeb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cda7a2aca3e3aaa4a1bea9a2bfab8dbea0a9aee3acbfa0b4e3a0a4a1">[email protected]</span></a>; (256) 955-3213 or Ms. Susan D. 
McRae, Office of Research and Technology Applications, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97e4e2e4f6f9b9faf4e5f6f2d7e4faf3f4b9f6e5faeeb9fafefb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ee9d9b9d8f80c0838d9c8f8bae9d838a8dc08f9c8397c0838782">[email protected]</span></a>; (256) 955-1501.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The invention pertains to inducing and 
sealing cracks in newly constructed containment vessels, such as 
linerless composite tanks, that are subject to crack propagation during 
the life of the vessels. The cracks are sealed before the vessel is 
placed in service to prevent or reduce leakage of the fluids that are 
stored in the vessels.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-721 Filed 2-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Guide Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), we, Kim
McReynolds, President and Director, and Brenda Sundwall, Secretary, Treasurer
and Director, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:








(1) The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








(2) The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.








Date:
            08/05/10
            
            By:
            /s/Kim
      McReynoldsKim
      McReynoldsPresident
      and DirectorGuide
      Holdings, Inc.Date:
            08/05/10
            
            By:
            /s/Brenda
      SundwallBrenda
      SundwallSecretary,
      Treasurer and DirectorGuide
      Holdings, Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 2 (Thursday, January 3, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 491]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6283]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

Date and Time: Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items To Be Discussed:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

Person to Contact for Information: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Darlene Harris,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-6283 Filed 12-28-07; 11:09 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Case 1:11-cv-00042-SPM-GRJ Document 10 Filed 04/19/11 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-00042-SPM-GRJ Document 10 Filed 04/19/11 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-00042-SPM-GRJ Document 10 Filed 04/19/11 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DWIGHT J PORTER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ

BAXTER, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (Doc. 23). 

The Second Amended Complaint is sufficient to alert the Defendants – with the

exception of The GEO Group – to the basis and nature of the claims against them.

With regard The GEO Group, however, Plaintiff has failed to explain how the GEO

Group, as the corporate employer of the named defendants, is connected to or

responsible for the actions of the individually named defendants for using excessive

force, retaliating against Plaintiff, and for allegedly being indifferent to Plaintiff’s medical

needs 

As the Court previously explained to Plaintiff, an employer generally is not

responsible for the acts of its employees. (Doc. 20). Further, to allege a claim against

the employer it is not enough simply to allege that Plaintiff was injured as a result of the

Group’s “official policy and custom” or that the Group acted in “bad faith.” Rather,

Plaintiff must identify the custom or policy of the Group which Plaintiff contends caused

the claimed injuries. In the absence of such information, The GEO Group should not

be named as a defendant in this case. Because the Plaintiff is proceeding pro se the
Page 2 of 2

Court will provide Plaintiff with one last opportunity to allege a claim against The GEO

Group.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Clerk shall mail to Plaintiff another complaint form which Plaintiff shall 

complete and return on or before January 13, 2011.

2. Failure to comply with this order within the time provided will result in a

recommendation to the district judge that this cause be dismissed as to The GEO

Group for failure to prosecute.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23 day of December, 2010. 

rd

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 5:10-cv-00206-RS -GRJ
# C_2011130EN.01000101.xml

| 30.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/1

---

2011/C 130/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 120, 16.4.2011

OJ C 120, 16.4.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 113, 9.4.2011

OJ C 103, 2.4.2011

OJ C 95, 26.3.2011

OJ C 89, 19.3.2011

OJ C 80, 12.3.2011

OJ C 72, 5.3.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof BPZ Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker, as President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and solely for thepurpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,that:

 

(1)                                 TheReport fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                 Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  MANUEL  PABLO ZÚÑIGA-PFLÜCKER |     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Manuel Pablo  Zúñiga-Pflücker                |     |
| *President,  Chief Executive Officer and Director*          | * * |
| March 31, 2010                                         |     |

 

----
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 

Non-Employee Director Compensation 
 Each
non-employee director of the Corporation shall receive: 
  

	 	•	 	an annual fee of $80,000, payable in advance 

  

	 	•	 	on the date of his or her initial election to the Board of Directors, a grant of 1,000 stock units, each of which represents the right to receive one share of the Corporation’s common stock, under the
Corporation’s 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2011 Plan”) 

  

	 	•	 	on September 20 of each year (if on such date the non-employee director has served on the Board of Directors for at least 180 days), 1,000 stock units, each of which represents the right to receive one share of the
Corporation’s common stock, under the 2011 Plan 

  

	 	•	 	reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with their service to the Corporation (including $1.00 per mile for private air travel) 


In addition: 
  

	 	•	 	non-employee directors shall be eligible for grants of stock options and equity awards under the Corporation’s other equity plans 


 

	 	•	 	the Lead Director shall receive an additional annual fee of $50,000 

  

	 	•	 	the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors shall receive an additional annual fee of $50,000 

  

	 	•	 	the Chairman of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors shall receive an additional annual fee of $5,000 

  

	 	•	 	the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors shall receive an additional annual fee of $5,000 


 

	 	•	 	each member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors shall receive a fee of $1,000 for each meeting attended 

  

	 	•	 	each member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors shall receive a fee of $1,000 for each meeting attended
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1814
CALVIN LEE SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusGILBERT F. JACKSON; OFFICER JASPER N. WHITEHEAD; OFFICER W. J. SANKER, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-00-124-2) Submitted: October 26, 2000 Decided: November 1, 2000 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Calvin Lee Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v. Jackson , No. CA-00-124-2 (E.D. Va. June 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### STATE v. LASSITER

No. 198 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 265.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1972.
Case 4:11-cv-00050-RH-WCS Document 34 Filed 06/30/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DONNIE JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:10cv344-WS

SANTA ROSA CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

October 21, 2010. See Doc. 9. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's

complaint and this case be dismissed under the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. §

1915(g). The plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 10) to the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation. 

This court having considered the record in light of the plaintiff's objections, it is

ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 9) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 8) is DENIED.

3. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:09cv126-WS

PREJUDICE under the "three strikes" provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

4. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of November , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2460 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to modify a 

provision relating to acquisition of beach fill. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2019 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 

to modify a provision relating to acquisition of beach fill. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sand Acquisition, 

5 Nourishment, and Development Act’’ or the ‘‘SAND Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF BEACH FILL. 

7 Section 935 of the Water Resources Development Act 

8 of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2299) is amended by striking ‘‘if such 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2460 IS

1 materials are not available from domestic sources for envi2 ronmental or economic reasons’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
|   | 1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |                                       |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                        |   |                                       |   |
| Date:  August 14, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Karen Kroymann                    |   |
|                        |   | Karen Kroymann                             |   |
|                        |   | Controller and Principal Financial Officer |   |
|                        |   |                                       |   |