alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Bar Group Inc., (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ulrik Gerdes, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Date: May 28, 2009

| | /s/
      Ulrik Gerdes       
| | -----------------------------
| | Ulrik Gerdes                 
| | Chief Financial Officer      
| | (Principal Financial Officer)

---
Exhibit
      32(a)







TXU
      CORP.


Certificate
      Pursuant to Section 906


of 
      Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO









The
      undersigned, C. John Wilder, Chairman, President and CEO of TXU Corp. (the
      “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:




1.
            The
                Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
                2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
            Information
                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
                the
                financial condition and results of operation of the
                Company.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed
      this
      1 st day of
      March, 2007.














/s/
                C. John WilderName:
            C.
                John WilderTitle:
            Chairman,
                President and CEO




































































A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      TXU Corp. and will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           25184
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    125000
<INVENTORY>                                      48330
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                198514
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  210014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           268787
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           139
<OTHER-SE>                                      565020
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    210014
<SALES>                                         671346
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                671346
<CGS>                                           480087
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   480087
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                807943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   380
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1582
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (618265)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (618265)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)


</TABLE>
- 257 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

Robert Dick, appellee and cross-appellant, v. Koski 

Professional Group, P.C., third-party plaintiff, 

appellant and cross-appellee, and Bland & 

Associates, P.C., third-party defendant, 

appellee and cross-appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed January 29, 2021. No. S-19-132.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J 

Russell Derr, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for 

rehearing overruled.

Robert M. Slovek and Dwyer Arce, of Kutak Rock, L.L.P., 

for appellant.

Aaron A. Clark, Ruth A. Horvatich, and Cody E. 

Brookhouser-Sisney, of McGrath, North, Mullin & Kratz, P.C., 

L.L.O., for appellee Robert Dick.

Ryan M. Kunhart and Jeffrey J. Blumel, of Dvorak Law 

Group, L.L.C., for appellee Bland & Associates, P.C.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed 

by the appellant, Koski Professional Group, P.C. (KPG), 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

01/29/2021 09:08 AM CST
- 258 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

308 Nebraska Reports

DICK v. KOSKI PROF. GROUP

Cite as 308 Neb. 257

concerning our opinion in Dick v. Koski Prof. Group, 307 Neb. 

599, 950 N.W.2d 321 (2020).

We find no substantive merit to KPG’s motion and overrule 

it, but modify the opinion as follows:

(1) In the background section, under the subheading 

“Peremptory Challenges,” we withdraw the last sentence of 

the sole paragraph and substitute the following: “Other than a 

marked copy of a jury roster included in a supplemental transcript, the jury selection process is not otherwise reflected in 

the appellate record.”

(2) In the analysis section, under the subheading “Peremptory 

Challenges (Assignment of Error No. 1),” we withdraw the 

seventh paragraph and substitute the following:

We do not decide that question here. While KPG has 

offered a marked copy of a jury roster in a supplemental 

transcript, the markings on that roster do not match the 

roster’s legend sufficiently to support KPG’s claim that 

it exhausted all its peremptory challenges. As such, the 

record is insufficient to support its assignment of error 

even if we found merit to KPG’s legal premise.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
30, 1997 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,813
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,053)
<INVENTORY>                                    210,537
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               441,800
<PP&E>                                         597,761
<DEPRECIATION>                               (378,082)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 851,887
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          224,581
<BONDS>                                         31,384
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           704
<OTHER-SE>                                   (414,413)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   851,887
<SALES>                                        309,172
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               309,172
<CGS>                                          211,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  264,244
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,364
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,564
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,072
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,492
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,492
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
# C_2011194EN.01000101.xml

| 2.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/1

---

2011/C 194/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 186, 25.6.2011

OJ C 186, 25.6.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 179, 18.6.2011

OJ C 173, 11.6.2011

OJ C 160, 28.5.2011

OJ C 152, 21.5.2011

OJ C 145, 14.5.2011

OJ C 139, 7.5.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2011157EN.01000101.xml

| 27.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 May 2011

2011/C 157/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4168 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,95 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4567 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86850 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9010 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2343 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7900 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,618 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,02 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9675 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1340 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2655 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3383 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3855 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0267 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7496 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7615 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 542,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8907 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1972 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4380 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 161,57 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3078 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,562 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,9775 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,085 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3012 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5107 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,1880 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4168

JPY

Japanese yen

115,95

DKK

Danish krone

7,4567

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86850

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9010

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2343

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7900

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,618

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,02

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9675

RON

Romanian leu

4,1340

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2655

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3383

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3855

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0267

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7496

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7615

KRW

South Korean won

1 542,21

ZAR

South African rand

9,8907

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1972

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4380

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 161,57

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3078

PHP

Philippine peso

61,562

RUB

Russian rouble

39,9775

THB

Thai baht

43,085

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3012

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5107

INR

Indian rupee

64,1880

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     UT
<LEGEND>
  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
  THE STATEMENT OF INCOME, STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS, BALANCE SHEET, AND
  STATEMENT OF COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>         0000811156
<NAME>        CMS ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                       4,350
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     2,724
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          1,257
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        1,527
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  9,858
<COMMON>                                            1
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       2,297
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              (292)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  1,877
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             393
<PREFERRED>                                       238
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            1,551
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                255
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       2,743
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                      0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      88
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                           0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        78
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   38
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  2,468
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                   9,858
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       2,506
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               68
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      2,121
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      2,189
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                           317
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 30
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                    347
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          168
<NET-INCOME>                                      179
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        26
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                     153
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           66
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            309
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.42<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.39
<FN>
<F1> EPS for CMS Energy Common Stock  $1.42
     EPS for Class G Common Stock     $1.20
</FN>
        







</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.02








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002














In connection with the Quarterly Report of Managed Futures Profile LV, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christian Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




























By:
/s/  Christian AngstadtName:
Christian AngstadtTitle:
Chief Financial Officer ofDemeter Management LLC,General Partner of the registrantDate:
May 14, 2010
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Harbrew Imports Ltd.. Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, Richard J. DeCicco,
President, Secretary and Director, and William S. Blacker, Chief Financial
Officer and Vice President-Finance and Administration, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




December
17, 2008




/s/Richard J.
      DeCiccoRichard
      J. DeCicco
                    President,
      Secretary and Director/s/William S.
      BlackerWilliam
      S. Blacker
                    Chief
      Financial Officer and Vice President-Finance and
                    Administration
---

EXHIBIT
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of eDoorways Corporation, Inc.. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Gary Kimmons, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      October 1,
      2009
            By:
            /s/ Gary KimmonsName:
      Gary KimmonsTitle:
      President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer)
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the period ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark M. Wellesley-Wood, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/MARK M. WELLESLEY-WOODMark M. Wellesley-Wood
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
September 30, 2003


---

QuickLinks
# C_2010340EN.01000101.xml

| 15.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5753 — DSB/First/DSBFirst Vast)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 340/01

On 6 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5753. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5753. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2253

In Re: CARLOS WOODS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:07-cr-00127-WDQ-1)

Submitted: March 8, 2010 Decided: March 15, 2010

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Woods, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Carlos Woods petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on 

his motion for a new trial and new counsel. He seeks an order 

from this court directing the district court to act. Our review 

of the district court’s docket sheet reveals that the district

court recently denied Woods’ motion. Accordingly, because the 

district court has acted on the motion, we deny the mandamus 

petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RUSSELL T. NEAL,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv309/MCR/CJK

OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFF, 

et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

filed on September 24, 2012, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after reviewing

objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is adopted as the opinion

of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial process.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of October, 2012.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE