alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NIOSH Conformity Assessment Letter

to Manufacturers

NIOSH CA 2020-1024 

February 2020

Effective immediately – NIOSH is prioritizing Respirator Approval 

Applications in response to COVID-19
Document Number

NIOSH CA 2020-1024

Page 2 of 2

In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, the National Institute for

Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Respirator Approval Program is prioritizing applications

received for new approvals and extension of approvals. NIOSH is committed to protecting workers,

including healthcare workers and first responders, by giving priority to applications to increase the

supply of N95 filtering facepiece respirators. NIOSH is also prioritizing Quality Assurance (QA)

applications to facilitate manufacturing at additional manufacturing sites, in accordance with

established and NIOSH-approved QA systems. 

Subject: Effective Immediately - NIOSH is prioritizing Respirator Approval 

Applications in response to COVID-19
# EUR-Lex - - EN

*|*

#

**Euro exchange rates **

*
Official Journal C 243 , 20/08/2011 P. 0003 - 0003 *

Euro exchange rates [1]

19 August 2011

2011/C 243/04

1 euro =

| Currency | Exchange rate |

USD | US dollar | 1,4385 |

JPY | Japanese yen | 110,00 |

DKK | Danish krone | 7,4487 |

GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86965 |

SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2204 |

CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1340 |

ISK | Iceland króna | |

NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8575 |

BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |

CZK | Czech koruna | 24,475 |

HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,15 |

LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |

LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |

PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1724 |

RON | Romanian leu | 4,2678 |

TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5700 |

AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3783 |

CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4189 |

HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2199 |

NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7404 |

SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7394 |

KRW | South Korean won | 1563,67 |

ZAR | South African rand | 10,3284 |

CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2006 |

HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4800 |

IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12320,66 |

MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2889 |

PHP | Philippine peso | 61,374 |

RUB | Russian rouble | 41,9115 |

THB | Thai baht | 42,896 |

BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2928 |

MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6173 |

INR | Indian rupee | 65,8110 |

[1] Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

--------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5537 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5537

 To authorize grantees of Department of Justice grants to set up task 
    forces on policing in local communities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2018

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize grantees of Department of Justice grants to set up task 
    forces on policing in local communities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Local Task Forces on 21st Century 
Policing Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. USE OF FUNDS TO ESTABLISH TASK FORCES.

    Section 501(a)(1) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10152(a)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
                    ``(I) The establishment of a task force, composed 
                of individuals with relevant experience or subject-
                matter expertise in law enforcement, civil rights, and 
                civil liberties, which shall identify the best ways to 
                create an effective partnership between law enforcement 
                officers of a unit of local government and the 
                community those officers serve that reduces crime and 
                increases trust.''.
                                 <all>
```
Consent of Independent Accountants



The Stockholders and Board of Directors
PowerTrader, Inc.


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement on
Form S-8 (File No.  333-50629) of PowerTrader,  Inc. of our report dated January
12, 1999 relating to the Consolidated Balance Sheets of PowerTrader,  Inc. as at
June 30, 1998 and 1997 and the related  Consolidated  Statements  of Loss,  Cash
Flow and Changes in Stockholders'  Equity (Deficit) for each of the years in the
three-year  period ended June 30, 1998 and the Consolidated  Statements of Loss,
Cash Flow and  Changes in  Shareholders'  Equity  (Deficit)  for the period from
December 29, 1998  (inception  of  PowerTrader  Software  Inc.) to June 30, 1998
(cumulative),  which report  appears in the June 30, 1998 Annual  Report on Form
10-KSB of PowerTrader, Inc.


                                                     /s/ BDO Dunwoody LLP

                                                     Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, British Columbia
March 22, 2000
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT E. FOWLER,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 3:11cv244/RV/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated September 28, 2012 (doc. 34). The parties have been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections (doc.

39), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of November, 2012.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 5 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2007 Revision, published July 2, 2007, at 72 FR 36192.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the following company: ULLICO Casualty Company (NAIC # 37893). Business Address: 1625 Eye St., NW., Washington DC 20006. Phone: (202) 682-4992. Underwriting Limitation b/: $5,819,000. Surety Licenses c/: AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, PR, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, VI, WA, WV, WI, WY. Incorporated In: Delaware. Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2007 Revision, to reflect this addition.

                    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (                    *see*31 CFR part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of July 1 in the Circular, which outlines details as to underwriting limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety business, and other information.                

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*

Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

Dated: December 21, 2007.

Vivian L. Cooper,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.

[FR Doc. 07-6278 Filed 1-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
Exhibit 10.74


		
			List of Accredited Investors
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
						Investor

					
					
						 

					
					
						Subscription Amount

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
						Shares

				
	
					
						Harold Wrobel

					
					
						 

					$350,000 
					
					
						 

					1,000,000 
				
	
					
						Flavigny, LLC

					
					
						 

					$250,000 
					
					
						 

					714,286 
				
	
					
						Andrew Tobias

					
					
						 

					$100,000 
					
					
						 

					285,715 
				
	
					
						Joseph W. Kaempfer, Jr. 

					
					
						 

					$100,000 
					
					
						 

					285,715 
				
	
					
						Lewis Titterton

					
					
						 

					$50,000 
					
					
						 

					142,858 
				
	
					
						Judson Longaker

					
					
						 

					$50,000 
					
					
						 

					142,858
EVA HELEN CANNIE,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-0944

Opinion filed December 6, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Steven B. Whittington, Judge.

Eva Helen Cannie, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed as unauthorized. See Logan 

v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2004). In light of the dismissal, the motion, filed on 

October 23, 2017, is denied. 

WOLF, LEWIS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JAMES NELSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:09-cv-315-SPM/WCS

PAINE WEBBER 

CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 7). Plaintiff has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed several objections (docs. 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, and 14). 

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have conducted a

de novo review of the sections of the report to which objections have been made. 

I find that the Report and Recommendation is correct and should be adopted.

Plaintiff has lodged a Civil Rights Complaint against thirty-one persons,

corporations, and government agencies, including Fannie Mae and the Supreme

Court of Florida. Plaintiff’s claims are patently frivolous. Additionally, Plaintiff has

an evident pattern of filing frivolous lawsuits, as well as a history of dishonesty
with the Courts regarding the number of cases he has previously filed. Plaintiff’s

continued efforts to initiate false and frivolous actions are a waste of the Court’s

time and also malicious. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 7) is

adopted and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed as an abuse of the judicial

process. The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket that this cause

was dismissed as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), Plaintiff’s motions for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis denied.

4. Plaintiff’s motion for an injunction (doc. 4) is denied.

5. All remaining motions are denied as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this eighteenth day of March, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6624

PAUL NAGY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HARLEY LAPPIN; SALLY C. JOHNSON; M. SCHAEFER; BRYON HERBEL, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-98-282-5-H) Submitted: September 10, 1999 Decided: October 15, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Nagy, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying relief onhis 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Nagy v. Lappin , No. CA-98-282-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24 1999). The motion to expedite is denied. We deny the motion fororal argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.10**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos. 333-46542, 333-112952, 333-114521, 333-115194, 333-126231, 333-132012 and 333-132737 on Form S-3, and Nos. 333-52514, 333-74339 and 333-128592 on Form S-8 of our report, dated July 19, 2006, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Isonics Corporation for the year ended April 30, 2006.

Denver, ColoradoJuly 24, 2006

 

----
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2511 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to provide the Marshal of the 

Supreme Court of the United States and Supreme Court Police with 

the authority to protect the Chief Justice of the United States, any 

Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, and other individuals in any 

location, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 

Mr. GRAHAM (for himself and Ms. SINEMA) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to provide the Marshal of the Supreme Court of the United States and 

Supreme Court Police with the authority to protect the 

Chief Justice of the United States, any Associate Justice 

of the Supreme Court, and other individuals in any location, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT BUILDING 

4 AND GROUNDS POLICING AUTHORITY. 

5 Section 6121 of title 40, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2511 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘any State’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘any location’’; 

3 (2) by striking subsection (b) and inserting the 

4 following: 

5 ‘‘(b) AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY FIREARMS.—Duties 

6 under subsection (a)(2)(A) with respect to an official guest 

7 of the Supreme Court in any location (other than the Dis8 trict of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia) shall be au9 thorized in writing by the Chief Justice or an Associate 

10 Justice, if those duties require the carrying of firearms 

11 under subsection (a)(4).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BRENDA LIKELY,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv187/LAC/EMT

SEC’Y, DEP’T OF CORR.,

Respondent. 

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated April 19, 2012 (doc. 22). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 18) is GRANTED.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice as

untimely. 

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21 day of May, 2012. st

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00187-LC-EMT Document 24 Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 1
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5454 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide that individuals in prison 

shall, for the purposes of a decennial census, be attributed to the last 

place of residence before incarceration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2018 

Mr. CLAY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 13, United States Code, to provide that 

individuals in prison shall, for the purposes of a decennial census, be attributed to the last place of residence 

before incarceration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Correct the Census 

5 Count Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESIDENCE OF INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS. 

7 Section 141 of title 13, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5454 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub2 section (h); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (f) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(g)(1) Effective beginning with the 2020 decennial 

6 census of population, in taking any tabulation of total pop7 ulation by States under subsection (a) for purposes of the 

8 apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the 

9 several States, the Secretary shall, with respect to an indi10 vidual incarcerated in a State, Federal, county, or munic11 ipal correctional center as of the date on which such cen12 sus is taken, attribute such individual to such individual’s 

13 last place of residence before incarceration. 

14 ‘‘(2) In carrying out this subsection, the Secretary 

15 shall consult with each State department of corrections to 

16 collect the information necessary to make the determina17 tion required under paragraph (1).’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

vs. Case No. 3:11cr35/MCR

JENNIFER J. LEE

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P.,

and has entered a plea of guilty to Count I of the Superseding Indictment. After cautioning and

examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I

determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported

by an independent basis in fact containing the essential elements of such offense. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have

sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: May 1, 2012 /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:11-cr-00035-MCR Document 35 Filed 05/01/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

twenty four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A

copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No. 3:11cr35/MCR

Case 3:11-cr-00035-MCR Document 35 Filed 05/01/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RONNIE DYSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00132-MP-GRJ

CITIMORTGAGE INC, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 4, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, which recommends that this action be transferred to the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Virginia, Richmond Division, for all further proceedings. Plaintiff has

filed no objection to the Report, and the time to do so has passed. Upon consideration, the Court

agrees with the Magistrate that district is the appropriate venue for this action because the case

involves a lease of a home in Richmond, Virginia. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 4, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein. 

2. This cause is TRANSFERRED in the interest of justice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§

1404(a) and 1406(a), to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Virginia, Richmond Division, for all further proceedings 

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00132-MP-GRJ Document 5 Filed 08/09/11 Page 1 of 1