alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HARRY MICHAEL WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-474-SPM-GRJ

MORRIS YOUNG, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________ /

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion To Dismiss Defendant Kevin

Peterson. (Doc. 19.) Plaintiff requests that the Court dismiss Defendant Kevin

Peterson from this action. In support of his request, Plaintiff advises that the process

server determined Defendant Kevin Peterson is no longer employed by the Gadsden

County Sheriff’s Office. Plaintiff further informs the Court that the process server has

been unable to locate Defendant Kevin Peterson. 

Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), a plaintiff may voluntarily dismiss an action

without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves

either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. The effect of such a voluntary

dismissal by a plaintiff is that the dismissal is without prejudice, unless the plaintiff has

previously dismissed any federal or state court action based on or including the same

claim. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(B). 

In this instance, Defendant Kevin Peterson was never served and therefore has

not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment. In addition, there is no indication

Plaintiff previously dismissed a federal or state court action based upon or including the

Case 4:10-cv-00474-RH-GRJ Document 20 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

same claim. Indeed, Plaintiff states in his First Amended Complaint he has not filed

any actions in federal or state court dealing with the same or similar facts or issues

involved in this action. (Doc. 9 at 4.) 

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s request to dismiss the claims against Defendant Kevin

Peterson without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(I) is due to be granted. 

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion To Dismiss Defendant Kevin Peterson (Doc. 19) is

GRANTED. 

(2) Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Kevin Peterson are hereby

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

(3) The Clerk is instructed to make the appropriate notation on the docket. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 5 day of December, 2011. th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00474-RH-GRJ Document 20 Filed 12/05/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JEANNETTE L. PARKER, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv55-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated February 13, 2012. (Doc. 15). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff’s

application for supplemental security income benefits is AFFIRMED.

DONE and ORDERED this 14th day of March, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00055-MP-GRJ Document 16 Filed 03/14/12 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SHARON HIERS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv306/RS-MD

MURPHY OIL USA, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Joint Motion To Stay Action Pending Arbitration (Doc. 14).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is stayed pending arbitration, which the parties shall complete

expeditiously.

2. The parties shall file status reports with the court every thirty days, beginning

on March 1, 2011.

ORDERED on February 8, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MAINLINE INFORMATION SYSTEMS,

INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:11cv137/RS-WCS

JIMMY D. FORDHAM,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested by Defendant’s Motion For Leave To File Reply Brief 

(Doc. 25) is granted.

ORDERED on June 24, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00137-RS-WCS Document 26 Filed 06/24/11 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BPZEnergy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker, as President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)            TheReport fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)            Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| */s/ Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker* |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Manuel Pablo Zúñiga-Pflücker       |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer             |   |
|                                              |   |
| September 26, 2006                                |   |
|                                                   |        |  |

 

----
# C_2010254EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5784 — Magna/Semikron/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 254/01

On 16 September 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5784. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5784. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011007EN.01000502.xml

| 12.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6075 — DHC/VUE Entertainment Investment)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 7/03

On 14 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6075. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6075. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011212EN.01002101.xml

| 19.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/21

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 July 2011

2011/C 212/10

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4045 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,10 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4567 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87315 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2534 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1485 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8670 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,405 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0440 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2688 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3468 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3237 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3472 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9488 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6640 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7107 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 490,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8084 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0853 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4500 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 024,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2311 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,463 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,6125 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,219 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2208 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5456 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,6060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4045

JPY

Japanese yen

111,10

DKK

Danish krone

7,4567

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87315

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2534

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1485

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8670

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,405

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0440

RON

Romanian leu

4,2688

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3468

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3237

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3472

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9488

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6640

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7107

KRW

South Korean won

1 490,82

ZAR

South African rand

9,8084

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0853

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4500

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 024,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2311

PHP

Philippine peso

60,463

RUB

Russian rouble

39,6125

THB

Thai baht

42,219

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2208

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5456

INR

Indian rupee

62,6060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5418 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5418

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out the Medical 
      Surgical Prime Vendor program using multiple prime vendors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Affairs Medical-Surgical 
Purchasing Stabilization Act''.

SEC. 2. MEDICAL SURGICAL PRIME VENDOR PROGRAM.

    (a) Vendors.--In procuring certain medical, surgical, and dental 
supplies or laboratory supplies for medical centers of the Department 
of Veterans Affairs, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall carry out 
the Medical Surgical Prime Vendor program, or successor program, in a 
manner that--
            (1) requires the Secretary to award contracts to multiple 
        regional prime vendors instead of a single nationwide prime 
        vendor; and
            (2) prohibits a prime vendor from solely designing the 
        formulary of such supplies.
    (b) Clinically Driven Sourcing.--
            (1) Expertise.--In carrying out the formulary of supplies 
        under the Medical Surgical Prime Vendor program, or successor 
        program, the Secretary shall ensure that each employee of the 
        Department of Veterans Affairs who conducts formulary analyses 
        or makes decisions with respect to including items on the 
        formulary has medical expertise relevant to the items for which 
        the employee conducts such analyses or makes such decisions.
            (2) Lists.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, and quarterly thereafter with respect to 
        any updates, the Secretary shall submit to the Committees on 
        Veterans' Affairs of the House of Representatives and the 
        Senate a list of each employee described in paragraph (1) and 
        the relevant medical expertise of the employee, listed by the 
        categories of items in the formulary described in such 
        paragraph.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5418

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out the Medical 
      Surgical Prime Vendor program using multiple prime vendors.
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RONALD M. MAXEY,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-106-RS-GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 8, Respondent’s first motion for an

extension of time to respond to the Petition. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

1. That the motion, Doc. 8, is GRANTED. Respondent shall respond to the

Petition on or before October 24, 2011.

2. Petitioner shall have until November 23, 2011, to file a reply, if any.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24 day of August 2011. th

 

s/ Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:11-cv-00106-RS-GRJ Document 9 Filed 08/24/11 Page 1 of 1
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 28 (Monday, February 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 6577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-605]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cable Television Laboratories, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on January 4, 2007, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Cable Television 
Laboratories, Inc. (``CableLabs''), filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, StarHub Cable Vision Ltd, Singapore, 
Singapore, has been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CableLabs intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On August 8, 1988, CableLabs filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on September 7, 1988 (53 FR 34593).
    The last notification with respect to membership changes was filed 
with the Department on June 8, 2005. A notice was published in the 
Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 11, 2005 
(70 FR 39796).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-605 Filed 2-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of George F. Canfield et al., as Trustees under the Will of Margaret T. Schley, Deceased, Respondents. James M. Schley, Jr., Appellant; Montfort S. Variell et al., Respondents.

*Matter of Schley,*181 App. Div. 931, affirmed.

(Argued October 1, 1918;

decided October 15, 1918.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 28, 1917, which affirmed a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court settling the accounts of the trustees under the will of Margaret T. Schley, deceased. Among the assets of testatrix was a deferred dividend policy of life insurance on the life of her husband, which he had duly assigned to her. Said policy having reached the end of its distribution period after the death of testatrix, the insurance company paid the amount of the deferred dividends to her trustees who credited the amount to principal. The appellant contended that the amount should be distributed as income. The surrogate overruled such contention.

*Chauncey E. Treadwell*and *James W. Treadwell*for appellant.

*Arthur B. Smith*and *George M. Cumming*for respondents'.

*Andrew S. Hammersley*and *Harold E. Lippincott*for Montfort S. Yariell et al., respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cook, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
# C_2010343EN.01000101.xml

| 17.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6017 — APMT/DPW/COSCO/QPGL/QQCT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 343/01

On 13 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6017. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6017. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EX-10.29



 Exhibit 10.29 

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO LOAN AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No. 2 dated as of August 19, 2014 (this “Amendment”) to the Loan Agreement dated as of
June 25, 2013, (as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Loan Agreement dated as of February 7, 2014, by the Letter Agreement dated as of February 7, 2014, the Letter Waiver dated June 10, 2014, the Letter Agreement, dated as of
June 10, 2014 and the Letter Consent, dated as of August 14, 2014, the “Existing Loan Agreement”) is entered into between MMS Funding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as lender (“Lender”),
Mevion Medical Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, as borrower (“Borrower”), and Mevion Medical Systems UK, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as guarantor (“Guarantor”), pursuant to and in
accordance with Section 13.05 of the Existing Loan Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein that are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Existing Loan Agreement. 

The Parties hereby agree as follows: 

ARTICLE I 

AMENDMENT 

Section 1.01. Change of Control. 

The definition of “Change of Control” set forth in Section 1.01 of the Existing Loan Agreement is hereby amended to add the
following language after clause (d) thereof: 
 “; or (e) a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Borrower.” 

ARTICLE II 

MISCELLANEOUS 

Section 2.01. Effect of Amendment. 

Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Existing Loan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. All references in the
Existing Loan Agreement to “this Agreement” or “herein” shall mean the Existing Loan Agreement as amended by this Amendment. 

Section 2.02. Governing Law. 

This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the Laws of the State of New York (without giving effect to any
conflict of laws principles that would require application of the Laws of another jurisdiction). 
 Section 2.03. Counterparts;
Facsimile Signatures. 
 This Amendment may be executed and delivered by facsimile signature (including PDF) and in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 







 The undersigned executed this Amendment as of the date first set forth above. 

 

			
	 MMS Funding LLC,
 as
Lender

		
	By:	 	/s/ Richard Gumer
		 	Richard Gumer
		 	Managing Member


  

			
	 Mevion Medical Systems, Inc.,

as Borrower

		
	By:	 	/s/ Joseph Jachinowski
		 	Joseph Jachinowski
		 	President and Chief Executive Officer


  

			
	 Mevion Medical Systems UK, LLC,

as Guarantor

		
	By:	 	/s/ Joseph Jachinowski
		 	Joseph Jachinowski
		 	Chief Executive Officer


 [Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to Loan Agreement]
#### STATE v. BLACK

No. 30.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 373.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 31 July 1972.