alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6383

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ORRIN LAMAR JACKSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-90-85)

Submitted: August 24, 2000 Decided: August 29, 2000

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Orrin Lamar Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Whisler, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Orrin L. Jackson seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Jackson, No. CR-90-85

(W.D.N.C. Mar. 8, 2000). To the extent that Jackson seeks to appeal from his December 13, 1990, judgment of conviction and

sentence, we dismiss the appeal as untimely. See Fed. R. App. P.

4(b). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 of CFO Consultants, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Norm LeBeoufNorm LeBeoufChief Executive Officer/s/ Norm LeBeoufNorm LeBeoufChief Financial OfficerDated: October 28, 2008   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CFO Consultants, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

THE BARTRAM, LLC,

Plaintiff, 

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cv28-SPM/AK

LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE

COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

THE BARTRAM, LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:09cv254-SPM/AK

C.B. CONTRACTORS, LLC,

Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

DUFFIELD ALUMINUM et al.,

Third-Party Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY

 

This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate

Case Numbers 1:09cv254-SPM/AK and 1:10cv0028-SPM/AK for Purposes of

Discovery. (1:09cv254–doc. 83; 1:10cv28–doc.42). Upon review of the
Paage 2 of 2

memorandum in opposition (1:09cv254--doc. 92) filed by Defendant Insurers, the

Court finds that consolidation of discovery would not substantially reduce cost or

delay, and poses a real risk of undue burden upon other parties. Accordingly, it

is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate Case Numbers 1:09cv254-SPM/AK 

and 1:10cv0028-SPM/AK for Purposes of Discovery. (1:09cv254–doc. 83;

1:10cv28–doc.42) is denied.

2. The denial is without prejudice to the parties’ ability to coordinate 

their discovery efforts by their own agreement.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of August, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132008 & (49) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. STATE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee/ Justices Cross-Appellant, 

v SC: 132008 

 COA: 265689 

Wexford CC: 04-018558-CK 

MICHAEL SHERMAN and 

PROCOM TOWERS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

MONTICELLO INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellant/ 

Cross-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 23, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as crossappellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case Nos. 3:10cr108/LAC

3:12cv192/LAC/EMT

LAVAR EUGENE ANDERSON

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated July 13, 2012 (doc. 63). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Defendant’s failure to complywith

an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15 day of August, 2012. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cr-00108-LC-EMT Document 64 Filed 08/15/12 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FELIX FORCADES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 244 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FELIX FORCADES,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 245 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MICHAEL C. RUFFIN,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:09CV326-RH/AK

KAREN BROWN,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff brings this cause pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 against Karen Brown, an

investigating police officer, for alleged false arrest and malicious prosecution relating to

an arrest which took place on July 17, 1997. (Doc. 5). This cause should be dismissed

on several grounds.

Despite two court orders, Plaintiff has failed to pay either the full filing fee or to

submit a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (See Docs. 4 and 6). 

Thus, as explained to him in the show cause order entered on October 23, 2009, to

which he made no response, he has failed to prosecute his lawsuit.

 More substantively, his claims are barred by the statute of limitations. 

 A federal § 1983 claim is governed by the forum state's residual personal injury

statute of limitations. Burton v. City of Belle Glade, 178 F.3d 1175, 1188 (11th Cir.

1999), citing Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 249-50, 109 S.Ct. 573, 102 L.Ed.2d 594
Page 2 of 2

(1989); Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 276, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985). In

Florida, "a plaintiff must commence a § 1983 claim . . . within four years of the allegedly

unconstitutional or otherwise illegal act." Burton, 178 F.3d at 1188, citing Baker v. Gulf

& Western Indus., Inc., 850 F.2d 1480, 1483 (11th Cir.1988). 

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s

amended complaint (doc. 5) be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute and because his

claims are barred by the statute of limitations. 

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 3rd day of December, 2009.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 10 days after

being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of

review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

No. 4:09cv326-RH/AK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CITY OF PANAMA CITY BEACH,

FLORIDA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:10cv255/RS-MD

TRITON ASSET LEASING GMBH,

TRANSOCEAN HOLDINGS, LLC, 

TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER

DRILLING, INC., HALLIBURTON ENERGY

SERVICES, INC., CAMERON

INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

This case is stayed until further Order. The parties are directed to J.P.M.L. 

R. 7.1(a). 

ORDERED on October 1, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 72388]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Project 
No. 2004-06

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 4, 2007, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301, et seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental 
Research Forum (``PERF'') Project No. 2004-06 has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ExxonMobil 
Research and Engineering Company, Fairfax, VA; and Shell Global 
Solutions (US) Inc., Houston, TX have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PERF Project No. 2004-06 intends to 
file additional written notifications disclosing all change in 
membership.
    On March 15, 2007, PERF Project No. 2004-06 filed its original 
notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on November 7, 2007 (72 FR 62867).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-6122 Filed 12-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 226 (Monday, November 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 65989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5817]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


SES Performance Review Board

AGENCY: National Transportation Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the 
National Transportation Safety Board Performance Review Board (PRB).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anh Bolles, Chief, Human Resources 
Division, Office of Administration, National Transportation Safety 
Board, 490 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594-0001, (202) 314-
6355.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c)(1) through (5) of Title 5, 
United States Code requires each agency to establish, in accordance 
with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one 
or more SES Performance Review Boards. The board reviews and evaluates 
the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the 
supervisor, and considers recommendations to the appointing authority 
regarding the performance of the senior executive.
    The following have been designated as members of the Performance 
Review Board of the National Transportation Safety Board.
    The Honorable Robert L. Sumwalt, Vice Chairman, National 
Transportation Safety Board; PRB Chair.
    The Honorable Kathryn Higgins, Member, National Transportation 
Safety Board.
    Steven Goldberg, Chief Financial Officer, National Transportation 
Safety Board.
    Walker Smith, Director, Office of Civil Enforcement, Environmental 
Protection Agency.
    Jack Fox, General Manager, Office of Pipeline Security, 
Transportation Security Administration, Department of Homeland 
Security.
    Joseph G. Osterman, Managing Director, National Transportation 
Safety Board.

    Dated: November 19, 2007.
Vicky D'Onofrio,
Federal Register Coordinator.
[FR Doc. 07-5817 Filed 11-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
# C_2009109EN.01000801.xml

| 13.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/8

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/173/09

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2009/C 109/06

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition EPSO/AD/173/09 to recruit conference interpreters (AD 5/AD 7) with Estonian as their main language.

The competition notice is published in Official Journal C 109 A of 13 May 2009 in Estonian only.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
# C_2010304EN.01001301.xml

| 10.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/13

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

2010/C 304/09

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| — | EPSO/AST/109/10 — Proofreaders with Italian as their main language (IT) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/109/10 — Proofreaders with Italian as their main language (IT)

| — | EPSO/AST/110/10 — Proofreaders with Maltese as their main language (MT) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/110/10 — Proofreaders with Maltese as their main language (MT)

| — | ASSISTANTS (AST 3) in the field of publications production |
| --- | --- |

—

ASSISTANTS (AST 3) in the field of publications production

The competition notice is published in Italian and Maltese only, in Official Journal C 304 A of 10 November 2010.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Optio Software, Inc. (the Company) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, C. Wayne Cape, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1). |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2). |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: |  | May 1, 2003 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    C. WAYNE CAPE                 
|----- |  | ----------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|      |  |             |  |  |  |     |  | C. Wayne Cape Chief Executive Officer
J-S25035-15

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

RASHEED NIFAS, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellant

v.

JOHN E. WETZEL, SHIRLEY MORE 

SMELA, DANIEL BURNS, JEFFREY 

WITHERITER, GERLAD ROZUM, DANIEL 

GEHLEMANN, JOSEPH MAZURKIEWICZ, 

ALLEN JOSEPH, MELISA HAINSWORTH, 

JOSEPH BIANCONI,

Appellees No. 1832 WDA 2014

Appeal from the Order Entered October 30, 2014

in the Court of Common Pleas of Somerset County

Civil Division at No.: 381 Civil 2014

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., STABILE, J., and PLATT, J.*

JUDGMENT ORDER BY PLATT, J.: FILED APRIL 28, 2015

Appellant, Rasheed Nifas, appeals pro se from the order dismissing his 

complaint with prejudice. He raises issues that are in the exclusive 

jurisdiction of the Commonwealth Court. Therefore, we transfer to that 

Court.

On June 20, 2014, Appellant initiated this civil rights action against 

Appellees, employees of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections. He 

alleged a violation of his constitutional rights based on retaliation, 

specifically, not returning him to general population, for filing a grievance 

____________________________________________

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S25035-15

- 2 -

related to Appellees requiring him to work for free in conjunction with his 

removal from the restricted release list. Appellees responded by filing 

preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer. On October 30, 2014, 

the trial court sustained the objections and dismissed the complaint with 

prejudice. Appellant timely appealed.

It is well-settled that “[e]ven when neither party has raised the issue 

of jurisdiction, this Court may, sua sponte, determine whether retention of 

jurisdiction is appropriate, or whether the matter should be transferred to 

the Commonwealth Court.” Commonwealth v. Reed, 696 A.2d 199, 200 

(Pa .Super. 1997), transferred to, 713 A.2d 150 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998) (citation 

omitted); see Pa.R.A.P. 751(a), 752(a).

Civil rights claims against prison officials are properly heard in the 

Commonwealth Court. See 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 762(a)(1)(i).

Here, Appellant identified the Commonwealth Court as having 

jurisdiction, but apparently misfiled his notice of appeal. (See Appellant’s 

Brief, at 1; Appellant’s Application to Transfer, 3/30/15, at 1-2). 

Furthermore, the trial court acknowledged that “[t]his matter is . . . on an 

appeal to the Commonwealth Court . . . .” (Trial Court 1925(a) Opinion, 

1/09/15, at 1). Accordingly, we transfer this matter to the Commonwealth 

Court in accordance with Appellant’s request. See Reed, supra at 200.
J-S25035-15

- 3 -

Appeal transferred to the Commonwealth Court.1

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 4/28/2015

____________________________________________

1 Appellant’s Application to Consider Timely Filed Reply Brief filed 3/30/15 is 

dismissed as moot.
<PAGE>


                                                                 Exhibit 99(w)



                                    TXU CORP.
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002


     The undersigned, H. Dan Farell, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of TXU Corp. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

   1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
      31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  2.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 11th day of March, 2003.





                                       /s/ H. Dan Farell
                                  ------------------------------------
                                  Name:    H. Dan Farell
                                  Title:   Executive Vice President
                                           and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DARRELL McKENZIE,

Plaintiff,

v.

WALTER McNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:11-cv-45-RH

AMENDED EXHIBIT E: PLAINTIFF’S WITNESSES

1. All Parties

2. Bair, Shawn DC#J09660

3. Brown, Gabriel DC#B00411

4. Chapman, Paul DC#703551

5. Chisholm, David

6. Hoang, Long D., M.D.

7. Jackson, Dexter, DC# V05220

8. Jerry Bunyon, N12689

9. Jones, Kevin DC#618400

10. Larry Mark, 083426

11. Light, Justin DC#Y29687

12. Lord, Michael, M.D.

13. Lyman, Carl DC#Y08133

14. Nolan, Tony A.

15. Records Custodian, Florida Department of Corrections

16. Richardson, Roger, 531565

17. Sherman, Heather

18. Smith, Isaac, DC# 601161 

19. Spears, Robert DC#723732

20. Stroud, Ellis, DC# 613250

21. Thach, Phoung, DC# T01135

22. Tiller, Bernell, DC# 125895

23. Wilson, Alexander DC#L44886

24. Harvey Norris

Case 4:11-cv-00045-RH-CAS Document 80 Filed 03/13/12 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------

                  Subsidiaries of Fox Family Worldwide, Inc.


NAME:                                    JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
                                         OR ORGANIZATION:

FCN Holding, Inc.                        Delaware
Fox Children's Network, Inc.             Delaware
Fox Family Management, LLC               Delaware
Fox Family Properties, Inc.              Delaware
Fox Kids Europe Channels BV              The Netherlands
Fox Kids Europe Limited                  United Kingdom
Fox Kids Europe, N.V.                    The Netherlands
Fox Kids Europe Properties, SarL         Luxembourg
Fox Kids Holdings, LLC                   Delaware
Fox Kids Worldwide, LLC                  Delaware
International Family Entertainment, Inc. Delaware
MTM Enterprises, Inc.                    California
Saban Entertainment, Inc.                Delaware
Saban International N.V.                 Netherlands Antilles
Saban Merchandising, Inc.                California
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 3:01cr82/LAC 

3:06cv28/LAC/MD

DANIEL JUAREZ

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on January 20, 2006, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255 (doc. 184) is summarily DISMISSED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of March, 2006.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:01-cr-00082-LC-MD Document 190 Filed 03/07/06 Page 1 of 1