alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

PHILLIP L. ADAMCZYK et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv444-RH/WCS

THRIVENT FINANCIAL BANK,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 11; supplemental report and recommendation, ECF No.

15; the plaintiff’s objections, ECF No. 16; and the defendant’s response, ECF No.

17. I have reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections.

The report and recommendation concludes that the plaintiff’s complaint fails

to state a claim on which relief can be granted. The supplemental report and

recommendation concludes that leave to file the first amended complaint should be

denied because it does not cure the deficiencies in the original complaint and thus

still fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted. These conclusions are

correct.

Case 4:10-cv-00444-RH -WCS Document 19 Filed 01/31/11 Page 1 of 3
The plaintiff’s pleadings are long on rhetoric and short on facts. The

plaintiff apparently obtained a mortgage loan from the defendant in 2003. The

plaintiff asserts that the defendant defrauded him, but the plaintiff does not allege

what the defendant said—or failed to say—that allegedly constituted fraud. The

plaintiff says the defendant failed to make required disclosures, but the plaintiff

does not say what the disclosures were, or why, if the defendant did not make

required disclosures, any resulting claim is not barred by the statute of limitations. 

In short, the plaintiff challenges banking practices—assigning mortgages and

creating securities based on mortgages—without alleging facts suggesting that the

defendant did anything improper toward the plaintiff. The plaintiff has failed to

state a claim on which relief can be granted.

The plaintiff has not asked for leave to amend further. There is no reason to

believe that granting leave to amend further would serve any purpose. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation, ECF No. 11, and supplemental report

and recommendation, ECF No. 15, are ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. 

2. The plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction, ECF No. 3, is

DENIED.

3. The defendant’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 9, is GRANTED.

Case 4:10-cv-00444-RH -WCS Document 19 Filed 01/31/11 Page 2 of 3
4. The plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 12, for leave to file the first amended

complaint, ECF No. 14, is DENIED. 

5. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The compliant is dismissed with

prejudice.”

6. The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on January 31, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00444-RH -WCS Document 19 Filed 01/31/11 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# Time and Date:

 10 a.m. (Eastern Time), December 17, 2007. 

      ( print page 70325)    

# Place:

 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. 

# Status:

 Open. 

# Matters To Be Considered:

1. Approval of the minutes of the November 19, 2007 Board member meeting. 

2. Thrift Savings Plan activity report by the Executive Director. 

a. Monthly Participant Activity Report. 

b. Monthly Investment Performance Report. 

c. Legislative Report. 

# Contact Person for More Information:

 Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640. 

Dated: December 7, 2007. 

Thomas K. Emswiler, 

Secretary to the Board,  Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. 

[FR Doc. 07-6024 Filed 12-7-07; 12:11 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
# C_2011047EN.01000301.xml

| 15.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 February 2011

2011/C 47/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3440 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4568 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84000 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7562 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3065 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8770 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,235 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,35 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7058 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9436 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2490 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1460 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3430 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3280 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4735 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7797 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7233 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 511,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8273 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8662 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4120 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 978,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1026 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,667 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,3787 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,368 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2438 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1932 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,1520 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3440

JPY

Japanese yen

112,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4568

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84000

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7562

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3065

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8770

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,235

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,35

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7058

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9436

RON

Romanian leu

4,2490

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1460

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3430

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3280

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4735

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7797

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7233

KRW

South Korean won

1 511,82

ZAR

South African rand

9,8273

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8662

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4120

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 978,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1026

PHP

Philippine peso

58,667

RUB

Russian rouble

39,3787

THB

Thai baht

41,368

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2438

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1932

INR

Indian rupee

61,1520

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BENNIE ROBLEDO,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO.: 5:10-cv-231-SPM/EMT

EDWIN G. BUSS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 25) that the case be dismissed pursuant to the

Respondent’s notification that the Petitioner is deceased. The Parties were

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report

and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 25) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The case is dismissed as moot.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this twelfth day of July, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00231-SPM-EMT Document 26 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011165EN.01000102.xml

| 7.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6246 — OJSC Novolipetsk Steel/Steel Invest & Finance)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 165/02

On 31 May 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6246. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6246. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 29, 2018

No. 04

- 17

- 00801

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.A.E., ET AL CHILDREN

,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA02691

Honor able Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellee ’ s motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is

extended to April 16, 2018.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of March, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

OZLEM YILMAZ,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00099-MP-AK

MEMED DUMAN,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the filing of a Complaint. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff brings

this cause pro se, and he has paid the filing fee. (Doc. 1). As such, he is responsible for serving

the complaint upon the Defendant named therein. 

Even though Plaintiff is not an attorney, he has elected to bring this lawsuit without

counsel and must prosecute this action according to applicable rules and procedure. To aid in

this effort, the court will direct Plaintiff to the applicable rule for service and will request the

Clerk to forward a copy of the rule to Plaintiff for his reference. Plaintiff is reminded that

Defendants must be served within 120 days from the date of the filing of the complaint. Fed. R.

Civ. P. 4(m). The complaint was filed on June 2, 2010. (Doc. 1). 

Plaintiff should pay particular attention to Rule 4(f), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

concerning service upon persons in foreign countries.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Clerk shall forward to Plaintiff a copy of Fed. R. Civ. P. 4, two blank summons
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:10-cv-00099-MP-AK

and two copies of Form 1A so that Plaintiff may request the Defendant to waive formal service,

if applicable.

2. If Plaintiff elects to attempt formal service, he shall complete each summons and

return to the Clerk within ten days of this date. If the summons are completed and returned, the

Clerk shall issue summons for each defendant indicating that they have twenty-one (21) days to

respond to the complaint.

3. Plaintiff is reminded that it is his responsibility to serve Defendants within 120 days

of the filing of the original complaint. Failure to timely serve Defendants in this case may result

in dismissal of this lawsuit. 

4. After a response to the complaint has been filed by a Defendant, Plaintiff is required

to mail to the attorney for the Defendants a copy of every pleading or other paper, including

letters, submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff must include with the original paper

to be filed with the Clerk of Court a certificate of service which states the date a correct copy of

the paper was mailed to the Defendants or the attorney representing the Defendants. Any paper

submitted for filing after a response to the complaint has been filed by the Defendants which

does not contain a certificate of service shall be returned by the Clerk and disregarded by the

Court.

5. The Clerk of Court shall return this file to the undersigned upon the filing of the last

answer by the Defendants. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of July, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# C_2010191EN.01000401.xml

| 15.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 July 2010

2010/C 191/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2703 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4502 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83430 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4118 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3428 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9260 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,470 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,02 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7087 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0662 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2578 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9612 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4405 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3157 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8744 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7697 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7478 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 527,61 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5960 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6056 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2142 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 489,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0618 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,756 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,8490 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,050 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2331 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1416 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,3620 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2703

JPY

Japanese yen

112,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4502

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83430

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4118

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3428

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9260

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,470

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,02

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7087

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0662

RON

Romanian leu

4,2578

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9612

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4405

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3157

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8744

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7697

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7478

KRW

South Korean won

1 527,61

ZAR

South African rand

9,5960

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6056

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2142

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 489,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0618

PHP

Philippine peso

58,756

RUB

Russian rouble

38,8490

THB

Thai baht

41,050

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2331

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1416

INR

Indian rupee

59,3620

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The First Years Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald
J. Sidman, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                              By: /s/ Ronald J. Sidman
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Ronald J. Sidman,
                                              Chairman, President, and Chief
                                              Executive Officer


In connection with the Quarterly Report of The First Years Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John R.
Beals, Senior Vice President - Finance and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                              By: /s/ John R. Beals
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              John R. Beals,
                                              Senior Vice President - Finance
                                              and Treasurer,
                                              (Chief Financial Officer and Chief
                                              Accounting Officer)
# National Family Caregivers Month, 2007

Each year during National Family Caregivers Month, we celebrate all those who dedicate themselves to caring for others and recognize their efforts to comfort and improve the lives of their loved ones in need. 

One of our Nation's defining values is compassion, and we must do our best to see that every citizen is treated with dignity and respect. Family caregivers demonstrate this compassion, often at great sacrifice, to assist with everyday activities for family members who are elderly, chronically ill, or disabled. This dedication contributes to a culture of caring and responsibility across our country. 

My Administration remains committed to supporting family caregivers by enhancing their access to services, agencies, and other providers. Late last year, I signed “The Lifespan Respite Care Act of 2006,” which establishes a program to assist family caregivers in accessing affordable and high-quality respite care. The National Family Caregiver Support Program encourages cooperation among agencies and other organizations that support and work with the family caregivers. This program offers information, training, and counseling to help family caregivers assist their loved ones. 

National Family Caregivers Month is a time to recognize family caregivers for their good hearts and tireless support. Their love and devotion exemplify the true spirit of America. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 2007 as National Family Caregivers Month. I encourage all Americans to honor the selfless service of caregivers who support their loved ones in need.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07-5510

Billing code 3195-01-P
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ADRIAN MILLS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-20-MP-GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on, doc. 27, Petitioner’s Motion For Extension of

Time To File Reply To Respondent’s Response. Petitioner seeks a 40 day extension of

time to respond to Respondent’s Response. 

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that:

Petitioner’s Motion For Extension of Time To File Reply To Respondent’s

Response (Doc. 27) is GRANTED. Petitioner shall file his reply to Respondent’s

Response on or before February 20, 2012.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22 day of December, 2011. nd

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00020-MP-GRJ Document 28 Filed 12/22/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ANTHONY QUINN COLEMAN,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv99-RH/EMT

PAIGE AUGUSTINE,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 8), to which no objections have been filed, and upon’s

plaintiff’s notice of voluntary dismissal (document 7). Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The clerk must enter judgment stating, “This action is DISMISSED without

prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on July 16, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
Exhibit 16


                              Tait, Weller & Baker
                          Certified Public Accountants


                                                  May 13, 2005

Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 11-3
450 5th Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Dear Sirs/Madams:

     We have read Item 4.01 of Bexil Corporation's Form 8-KA dated May 10, 2005,
and have the following comments:

1. We agree with the first sentence of the first paragraph as to our
resignation. We also agree with the statements made in the second sentence of
the second paragraph, the third and fourth paragraphs, and the first sentence of
the sixth paragraph.

2. We have no basis on which to agree or disagree with the statements made in
the first (except as to our resignation), second (except as to our resignation),
and fifth paragraphs and the second sentence of the sixth paragraph.


Sincerely,

/s/ Tait, Weller & Baker
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TERRY MUSHAT, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-56/RS-EMT

GULF HIGHLANDS BEACH RESORT

HOMEOWNERS’ ASSN., INC., 

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Before me is the Joint Notice of Settlement of Claims (Doc. 32). Pursuant to N.D. 

Fla. Loc. 16.2 it is ordered: 

1. The case is dismissed from the active docket of the court. 

2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves 

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this 

Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative purposes, 

and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is directed to 

close the case in its entirety for all purposes. 

ORDERED on December 8, 2010.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00056-RS-EMT Document 33 Filed 12/08/11 Page 1 of 1