alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RONNIE WAYNE DANIELS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-222-MP-GRJ

EDWIN G. BUSS,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Notice Of Substitution of Parties filed by Plaintiff. 

(Doc. 15.) Plaintiff requests the Court to substitute Edwin G. Buss as Secretary of the

Florida Department of Corrections in the place of Walter A. McNeil, who no longer is the

Secretary.

Upon due consideration, the Clerk is directed to change the docket to reflect

Edwin G. Buss as the proper Defendant in this action.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8 day of June 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00222-MP-GRJ Document 16 Filed 06/08/11 Page 1 of 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

317 

CA 10-01163 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, AND GORSKI, JJ.

 

 

FRANK MCGUIRE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS, 

AND MCGUIRE CHILDREN, LLC, 

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

WILLIAM L. HUNTRESS, ACQUEST HOLDINGS, INC., 

ACQUEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ACQUEST GOVERNMENT 

HOLDINGS OPP, LLC, ACQUEST GOVERNMENT HOLDINGS, 

U.S. GEOLOGICAL, LLC, AND LINCOLN PARK 

ASSOCIATES, LLC, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

HAGERTY & BRADY, BUFFALO (MICHAEL A. BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

MATTAR, D’AGOSTINO & GOTTLIEB, LLP, BUFFALO (KRISTA GOTTLIEB OF

COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M.

Curran, J.), entered November 10, 2009. The order granted in part and

denied in part defendants’ motion for a trial order of dismissal

pursuant to CPLR 4401.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988;

Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567; see

also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). 

Entered: April 1, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mill City
Ventures III, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas Polinsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and I, Joseph A. Geraci, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|November 14, 2016 | /s/ Douglas Polinsky    
|----------------- | ------------------------
|                  | Douglas  Polinsky       
|                  | Chief Executive Officer 
|                  |                         
|November 14, 2016 | /s/ Joseph A. Geraci, II
|                  | Joseph A. Geraci, II    
|                  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Guiseppe Craprizzio, Appellant, *v.*Central New England Railway Company, Respondent.

*Craprizzio*v. *Central New England By. Co.,*172 App. Div. 950, affirmed.

(Argued November 13, 1918;

decided December 3, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 18, 1916, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon , a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff was in the employ of an individual contractor doing work in one of defendant’s yards. On the day of the accident he quit work about five-thirty p. m. and walked from the roundhouse southeast across the spur tracks. The course he followed gradually converged with the path which was south of the" southerly ladder track and he was attempting to reach that path when the accident happened. He had crossed all the spur tracks but the last one. There he was struck by an east-bound train. On the day of the accident many of the spur tracks contained cars, and in crossing said tracks he passed between the cars wherever he- could find an opening. As he crossed next to the last spur track there were one or two cars standing thereon to his right between him and the ladder track. After passing these cars he stated that he looked to the right toward the ladder track and to the left and neither saw nor heard anything approaching. He then took but two steps when he was struck by the left-hand front corner of the engine, which was dragging a train from the southerly ladder track to the spur track. The complaint was dismissed on the ground that defendant was guilty of contributory negligence.

*Charles Coldzier*and *Frederick Hemley*for appellant.

*720
      *John M. Gibbons*and *Charles M. Sheafe, Jr.,*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sungro Minerals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended August 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:           October 20, 2010
By:
/s/ Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.Name:
Erwin Vahlsing, Jr.Title:
Chief Financial Officer







A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided Sherb & Co., LP and will be retained by Sungro Minerals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011101EN.01002601.xml

| 1.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/26

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 March 2011

2011/C 101/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4207 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4567 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88370 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9329 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3005 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8330 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,543 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,72 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7095 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0106 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1221 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1947 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3736 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3785 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0559 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8598 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7902 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 554,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6507 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3036 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3778 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 366,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2983 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,559 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,976 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3058 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9276 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,3450 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4207

JPY

Japanese yen

117,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4567

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88370

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9329

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3005

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8330

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,543

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,72

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7095

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0106

RON

Romanian leu

4,1221

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1947

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3736

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3785

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0559

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8598

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7902

KRW

South Korean won

1 554,51

ZAR

South African rand

9,6507

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3036

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3778

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 366,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2983

PHP

Philippine peso

61,559

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2850

THB

Thai baht

42,976

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3058

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9276

INR

Indian rupee

63,3450

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Pages 852-857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 08-27]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-27 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: December 27, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 853]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04JA08.000


[[Page 854]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04JA08.001


[[Page 855]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04JA08.002


[[Page 856]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04JA08.003


[[Page 857]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN04JA08.004

[FR Doc. 07-6285 Filed 1-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WILLIAM DENTON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00147-MP -GRJ

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR LEVY COUNTY FLORIDA, LEVY

COUNTY FLORIDA,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 27, Notice of Settlement by William Denton. 

Plaintiff has notified the Court that a settlement has been reached as to all claims. Accordingly,

it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice and this case is closed. 

2. The Court will retain jurisdiction for 60 days, however, to ensure that settlement

is effected.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of April, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

WILLIAM CORCORAN and

VINCENT RIVERA,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv303/RS-EMT

JOHN PALMER, et al,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15). No

objections have been filed. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice because of Plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an Order of the court

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on July 20, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00303-RS-EMT Document 16 Filed 07/20/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RONNIE WAYNE DANIELS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00222-MP-GRJ

EDWIN G BUSS, WALTER A MCNEIL,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 17, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that this case be dismissed for abuse of the judicial process. 

The plaintiff filed objections, Doc. 18, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those

portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection was made. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C). Upon consideration, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that the plaintiff

failed to truthfully fill out the complaint form when he declined to list two previous federal

cases. The Court also finds not credible the explanations given by the plaintiff that he forgot

these prior cases. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and incorporated

herein. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for abuse of the judicial

process. The dismissal of this case should count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C §

1915(g).

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00222-MP-GRJ Document 19 Filed 10/21/11 Page 1 of 1
BDO Dunwoody
Chartered Accountants
One Bentall Centre
300-505 Burrard Street
Vancouver, BC, Canada  V7X1T1

                                              Consent of Independent Accountants

PowerTrader, Inc.
Vancouver, British Columbia

We hereby consent to the  incorporation  by reference of our report dated August
15,  1997,  relating to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of the Company
appearing in the  Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB as of and for the year
ended June 30, 1997.

Vancouver, British Columbia
September 26, 1997                       /s/ BDO Dunwoody Chartered Accountants
# C_2009075EN.01003501.xml

| 31.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/35

---

Call for proposals under the work programme for grants in the field of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) as foreseen in the European Economic Recovery Plan

(Commission Decision C(2009) 2183)

(2009/C 75/12)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, is hereby launching a call for proposals in order to award grants to projects in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the work programme for grants in the field of the Trans-European Transport Network as foreseen in the European Economic Recovery Plan.

The maximum amount available under this call for proposals, for 2009, is EUR 500 million.

EUR 500 million

The call is closing on 15 May 2009.

15 May 2009

The complete text of the call for proposals is available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/ten_t_ea/call_for_proposals_2009_en.htm

---
# C_2010233EN.01000601.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5938 — Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation/Dimension Data Holdings PLC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 233/03

On 18 August 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5938. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5938. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011055EN.01000101.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/1

---

2011/C 55/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 46, 12.2.2011

OJ C 46, 12.2.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 38, 5.2.2011

OJ C 30, 29.1.2011

OJ C 13, 15.1.2011

OJ C 346, 18.12.2010

OJ C 328, 4.12.2010

OJ C 317, 20.11.2010

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
H. R. 5317 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To repeal section 2141 of the Revised Statutes to remove the prohibition on certain 

alcohol manufacturing on Indian lands. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN ALCOHOL MANUFACTURING ON INDIAN LANDS. 

Section 2141 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 251) is repealed. 

SEC. 2. NO EFFECT ON TAXATION OR STATE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE 

ALCOHOL WITHIN STATE BORDERS. 

(a) NO EFFECT ON TAXATION.—Nothing in section 1 or the 

repeal made by section 1 shall affect State or Federal taxation. 

(b) STATE AUTHORITY UNAFFECTED.—Nothing in section 1 or 

the repeal made by section 1 shall diminish, enlarge, or otherwise 

affect a State’s authority to regulate the importation and sale 

of alcoholic beverages within its own borders, including State 

authority over the manufacture, distribution, transportation, or sale 

of intoxicating liquors. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
|   | (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| Date: August 16, 2010 | By:    |   /                                         |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |   | /s/ Sergey Viktorovich Lukin                          |
|                  |   | Sergey Viktorovich Lukin                              |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5243 

To direct the Attorney General and the Secretary of Education to develop 

and implement national standards and best practices for school resource 

officers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2018 

Mr. HIGGINS of Louisiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to 

the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To direct the Attorney General and the Secretary of Education to develop and implement national standards and 

best practices for school resource officers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘School Watch and 

5 Training Act of 2018’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5243 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF STAND2 ARDS AND BEST PRACTICES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the 

4 date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General, 

5 in consultation with the Secretary of Education, shall de6 velop and implement— 

7 (1) national standards for school resource offi8 cers, including— 

9 (A) a requirement that all school resource 

10 officers complete any training recommended by 

11 the Attorney General and the Secretary; 

12 (B) standards governing the quality of se13 curity training and active shooter training pro14 vided to school resource officers; and 

15 (C) any other standards the Attorney Gen16 eral and the Secretary determine to be nec17 essary to ensure the competence of school re18 source officers; and 

19 (2) best practices for school resource officers. 

20 (b) SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICER DEFINED.—In this 

21 section, the term ‘‘school resource officer’’ has the mean22 ing given the term in section 1709(4) of the Omnibus 

23 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 

24 10389(4)). 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5243 IH

1 SEC. 3. REPORT. 

2 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact3 ment of this Act, the Attorney General, in consultation 

4 with the Secretary of Education, shall submit to Congress 

5 a report that includes— 

6 (1) the standards and best practices developed 

7 under section 2; and 

8 (2) a plan for implementing such standards and 

9 best practices. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS