alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010192EN.01000201.xml

| 16.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 192/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 192/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 July 2010

2010/C 192/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2828 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4503 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83565 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4162 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3420 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9265 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,464 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7089 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0608 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2585 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9695 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4504 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3201 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9669 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7703 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7625 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 543,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7010 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6955 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2153 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 591,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1075 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,405 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,1644 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,377 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2524 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,2402 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,7960 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2828

JPY

Japanese yen

113,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4503

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83565

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4162

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3420

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9265

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,464

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7089

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0608

RON

Romanian leu

4,2585

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9695

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4504

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3201

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9669

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7703

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7625

KRW

South Korean won

1 543,14

ZAR

South African rand

9,7010

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6955

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2153

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 591,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1075

PHP

Philippine peso

59,405

RUB

Russian rouble

39,1644

THB

Thai baht

41,377

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2524

MXN

Mexican peso

16,2402

INR

Indian rupee

59,7960

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### GALLIGAN v. SMITH

No. 101 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 220.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 16 June 1972.
Ex. 10.2 AssignmentofPSA (SV)


EXHIBIT 10.2




ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT




For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, STEADFAST ASSET HOLDINGS, INC., a California corporation (“Assignor”), hereby assigns to STAR SUMMER VALLEY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), all of Assignor’s rights and obligations under and in regard to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions dated July 15, 2014, (as may have been amended or may hereafter be amended, the “Purchase Agreement”), between Stonemark S/SV, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Seller”) and Assignor for the purchase and sale of that certain real property located in Austin, Texas, as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”).


Assignee hereby agrees to and shall assume, perform and be fully responsible for the performance of all of the obligations of Assignor under the Purchase Agreement.


All of the provisions, covenants and agreements contained in the Assignment shall extend to and be binding upon the respective legal representatives, successors and assigns of Assignor and Assignee.  This Assignment represents the entire agreement between Assignor and Assignee with respect to the subject matter of the Assignment, and all prior or contemporaneous agreements regarding such matters are hereby rendered null and void and of no force and effect. 


(SIGNATURES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE)





WITNESS THE EXECUTION HEREOF, as of this August 28, 2014.
                    
                        	
	
	ASSIGNOR:

	 

	STEADFAST ASSET HOLDINGS, INC.,

	a California corporation



                	
		
	By:
	/s/ Ana Marie del Rio

	 
	Ana Marie del Rio, Vice President




                        
    	
	
	ASSIGNEE:

	 

	STAR SUMMER VALLEY, LLC

	a Delaware limited liability company



        
    	
		
	By:
	Steadfast Apartment Advisor, LLC,

	 
	a Delaware limited liability

	 
	company, its Manager






    	
		
	By:
	/s/ Kevin J. Keating

	 
	Kevin J.  Keating, Treasurer




                        



Exhibit A


DESCRIPTION OF THE LAND


Lot 1, STONEHURST, a subdivision in Travis County, Texas, according to the map or plat recorded in Volume 83, Page 75C-75D, of the Plat Records of Travis County, Texas.
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

INDEPENDENT FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Independent Film Development Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeff Ritchie, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 20, 2010



/s/  Jeff Ritchie

Jeff Ritchie

Chief Executive Officer and Director
# C_2010302EN.01000101.xml

| 9.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5958 — GS/TPG/Ontex)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 302/01

On 30 September 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5958. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5958. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2010320EN.01000301.xml

| 25.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/3

---

List of public holidays for 2012 for the institutions of the European Union

2010/C 320/04

PUBLIC HOLIDAYS FOR 2012

PUBLIC HOLIDAYS FOR 2012

| 2 January | Monday, the day following New Year’s Day |
| --- | --- |
| 5 April | Maundy Thursday/Holy Thursday |
| 6 April | Good Friday |
| 9 April | Easter Monday |
| 1 May | Tuesday, Labour Day |
| 9 May | Wednesday, Anniversary of the Declaration made by President Robert Schuman in 1950 |
| 17 May | Thursday, Ascension Day |
| 18 May | Friday, the day following Ascension Day |
| 28 May | Whit Monday |
| 15 August | Wednesday, Assumption Day |
| 1 November | Thursday, All Saints’ Day |
| 2 November | Friday, All Souls’ Day |
| 24 December until 31 December | Monday (6 end-of-year days) Monday |
| TOTAL | 18 days |

2 January

Monday, the day following New Year’s Day

5 April

Maundy Thursday/Holy Thursday

6 April

Good Friday

9 April

Easter Monday

1 May

Tuesday, Labour Day

9 May

Wednesday, Anniversary of the Declaration made by President Robert Schuman in 1950

17 May

Thursday, Ascension Day

18 May

Friday, the day following Ascension Day

28 May

Whit Monday

15 August

Wednesday, Assumption Day

1 November

Thursday, All Saints’ Day

2 November

Friday, All Souls’ Day

24 December until 31 December

Monday (6 end-of-year days) Monday

TOTAL

18 days

Luxembourg: same days apply as in Brussels

Work will resume as normal on Thursday 3 January 2013.

Without prejudice to the schedule of public holidays for 2013, Wednesday 2 January 2013 will be a holiday.

The Commission reserves the right to modify these provisions, should the needs of service so require.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CARLETHA PURIFOY,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv312/LAC/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May3, 2012 (doc. 23). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29 day of May, 2012. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00312-LC-EMT Document 26 Filed 05/29/12 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

vs. Case No. 3:10cr25/MCR

PEDRO D. GONZALEZ

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the Defendant,

PEDRO D. GONZALEZ, to Count I of the Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties

shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of April 2010. 

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 70618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6015]



[[Page 70618]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, December 13, 2007.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered: 
    1. NCUA's Strategic Plan 2009-2014.
    2. NCUA's Policy for Setting the Operating Level and Monitoring the 
National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF).
    3. National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) Investment 
Policy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-6015 Filed 12-10-07; 2:37 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Broadcasting Board of Governors

# Date and Time:

Tuesday, November 27, 2007, 10 a.m.-10:30 a.m. 

# Place:

Cohen Building, Room 3360, 330 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20237. 

# Closed Meeting:

The members of the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will meet in a special session to review and discuss budgetary issues relating to U.S. Government-funded non-military international broadcasting. This meeting is closed because if open it likely would either disclose matters that would be properly classified to be kept secret in the interest of foreign policy under the appropriate executive order (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(1)) or would disclose information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to significantly frustrate implementation of a proposed agency action. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(9)(B)) In addition, part of the discussion will relate solely to the internal personnel and organizational issues of the BBG or the International Broadcasting Bureau. (5 U.S.C. 552b.(c)(2) and (6)) 

# Contact Person for More Information:

Persons interested in obtaining more information should contact Carol Booker at (202) 203-4545.

Dated: November 27, 2007.

Carol Booker,

Legal Counsel.

[FR Doc. 07-5891  Filed 11-27-07; 2:50 pm]

BILLING CODE 8610-01-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOSE ULISES SILVAS-RODRIGUEZ,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv373-RH/WCS

ATTORNEY GENERAL et al.,

Respondents.

____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 7. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “This case is DISMISSED without

prejudice.” The clerk must close the file. 

SO ORDERED on January 18, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 12.1
 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 11) PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 11) PLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement that is included in these
reports.
 By:
    /s/ Timothy George JungName:
    Timothy George JungTitle:
    DirectorDate:
    July 14, 2008 -26-
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DANSHAYE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:10cv463-WS

JUSTIN WARD,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 5)

docketed November 2, 2010. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's

complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

The plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed the record and has determined that the magistrate

judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 5) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order. 

2. The plaintiff's complaint, and this action, are DISMISSED for failure to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall note on the docket

that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of November , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2010248EN.01000102.xml

| 15.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5854 — Total Group/HIPS & GPPS Business of Polimeri)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 248/02

On 30 June 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5854. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5854. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
1 See Coe v. S tate , 17 S.W.3d 193, 248 -49 (Tenn. 2000) (Birch, J., dissenting). 

### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON November 15, 2000 S ession
STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES P. STOUT
Automatic Appeal f

rom the Court of C

riminal Appeals Criminal Court for Shelby County Nos. 96-08227, 96-08228, 96-08229 Joseph B. Dailey, Judge

No. M1998-00079-SC-DDT-DD - Filed May 24, 2001

A DOLPHO A. B IRCH , J R ., J., concurring and dissenting. Although I agree with the majority’s decision to uphold the conviction in this case, I write separately to emphasize my

continued dissatis

faction with Tenn

essee’s compar

ative proportiona

lity review protocol. Beg

inning with

my dissent in State v. Chalmers , I have repeatedly ca lled for reform of the protocol. 28 S.W.3d 913, 923-25 (Tenn. 2000) (Birch, J., concurring and dissenting); see also, e.g. , State v. Carruthers , 35 S.W

. 3d 516, 581 (Tenn. 2000) (Birch, J., concurring and dissenting); Statev. Keen , 31 S.W.3d 196, 234 (Tenn. 2000) (Birch, J., concurring and dissenting). Our current protocol, in my view, has three shortcomings: “the ‘test’ we employ

[for comparative

proportionality review] is so broad that nearly any sentenc e could be found proportionate; our review procedures are too subjective; and the ‘pool’ of cases which are reviewed for propor tionality is too small.” Chalmers , 28 S.W.3d at 923 (Birch, J., concurring and dissenting). Unless these shortcomings are remedied, this Court cannot pr ovide genuine a

ssurance that dis

proportionate se

ntences of death

will be set aside.

“I am unwilling to approve of results re ached thr ough the use of a procedure with which I cannot agree,” 1 and to date, the flaws I perceive in our comparative proportionality review protocol have not been cured. Therefore, I dissent, respectfully, from the Court’s decisi

on to impose the dea

th penalty in this case.

___________________________________ ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, J R., JUSTICE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

EDWARD L. THOMPSON, SR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:09cv384/LAC/EMT

JENT KEELS,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause is before the court on Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (Doc. 1). The court notes that Plaintiff has neither paid the filing fee nor submitted a motion

to proceed in forma pauperis. Before this matter may proceed, Plaintiff must either pay the fee or

obtain leave to proceed in forma pauperis by filing a fully and properly completed motion and

attachments.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk of court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the form for non-prisoner pro

se parties to request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number should be written on the

form.

2. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Plaintiff shall

(1) pay the filing fee of $350.00, or (2) submit a fully completed motion to proceed in forma

pauperis.

3. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order as instructed may result in a

recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of September 2009.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE