alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1
 CERTIFICATION
            
  The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
        Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
              
               /s/ Daniel Johannes Pretorius Daniel Johannes Pretorius Chief Executive Officer


Exhibit 12.2
 CERTIFICATION
                 
  The Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:
                 Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
                            
                           /s/ Anthon Tobias Meyer 
Anthon Tobias Meyer Acting Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22


DEUTSCHE FINANCIAL SERVICES
DEUTSCHE BANK GROUP

                                                    Deutsche Financial Services
                                                    655 Maryville Centre Drive
                                                    Saint Louis, MO 63141-5832


                                                    Telephone:   (314) 523-3858
                                                    Facsimile:   (314) 523-3008
                                                    E-mail:    leroy.hair@db.com

VIA FAX TO: 662-569-3332

July 29, 2002

George Hastings, President
Aquapro Corporation
1100
Hwy 3
Sunflower, MS 38778


Dear Mr. Hastings,

On July 25 I received a fax from Joe Hale regarding payment of the delinquent
obligations. I have reviewed his proposals and wish to respond. It appears to me
he is proposing to pay $57,342.23 on these accounts on or before Dec. 9. I have
reviewed the present status of the accounts and find that the amounts now due
are higher than previously thought. A printout of each account is attached for
your review. I believe you will agree the print outs show the following amounts
now due:

#854                      $25,733.93
#847                      $ 2,858.92
#792                      $25,767.75
#526                      $14,612.10
------------------------------------
Total                     $68,972.70

Between now and yearend there will be two additional payments due on note #854
in the amount of $8,561.31 each. In addition, Mr. Hale proposes paying off #847
which would have a balance of $2,858.92. If I have added these correctly the
amount required to bring the accounts current by yearend would be $86,095.32.

I regret any miss-understanding but I feel we must agree on the amounts now due
and those coming due before yearend. If Mr. Hale were willing to increase the
amounts payable each month to reach the total of $86,095.12 before yearend I
feel I could recommend acceptance.

Sincerely,

DEUTSCHE FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


LEROY HAIR

Leroy Hair
Collection Representative
Collections/Loss Recovery
072902a
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

COMMUNITY MARITIME PARK

ASSOCIATES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:11cv60/MCR/CJK

MARITIME PARK DEVELOPMENT

PARTNERS, LLC,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER

Pursuant to the Plaintiff’s response, stipulating to the requested relief (doc. 320),

Defendant’s Motion for Limited Relief from Rule 615 Sequestering or Exclusion of a

Witness (doc. 317) is GRANTED.

DONE and ORDERED this 22nd day of January, 2013.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2009075EN.01003401.xml

| 31.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/34

---

Call for proposals under the multi-annual work programme 2009 for grants in the field of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) for the period 2007-2013

(Commission Decision C(2009) 2178)

(2009/C 75/11)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy and Transport is hereby launching a call for proposals, under the multi-annual work programme for the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) for the period 2007-2013, in order to award grants to:

| — | Field No 8:
  TEN-T Priority Project No 21 — Motorways of the Sea. The maximum total amount available for the selected proposals, for 2009, is EUR 30 million. |
| --- | --- |

—

Field No 8:

TEN-T Priority Project No 21 — Motorways of the Sea. The maximum total amount available for the selected proposals, for 2009, is EUR 30 million.

Motorways of the Sea

| — | Field No 9:
  projects in the field Intelligent Transport Systems for Road Traffic. The maximum total amount available for the selected proposals, for 2009, is EUR 100 million. |
| --- | --- |

—

Field No 9:

projects in the field Intelligent Transport Systems for Road Traffic. The maximum total amount available for the selected proposals, for 2009, is EUR 100 million.

Intelligent Transport Systems for Road Traffic

| — | Field No 10:
  projects in the field of European Rail Traffic Management Systems (ERTMS). The maximum total amount available for the selected proposals, for 2009, is EUR 240 million. |
| --- | --- |

—

Field No 10:

projects in the field of European Rail Traffic Management Systems (ERTMS). The maximum total amount available for the selected proposals, for 2009, is EUR 240 million.

European Rail Traffic Management Systems (ERTMS)

The call is closing on 15 May 2009.

15 May 2009

The complete text of the call for proposals is available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/ten_t_ea/call_for_proposals_2009_en.htm

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael R. Stanfield, Chief Executive
Officer of Intersections Inc. (the Company), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows:



| | 1. | The amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such amendment to the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this Certification this 18th day of November 2011.



By:

/s/    Michael R. StanfieldName:

Michael R. StanfieldTitle:

Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Intersections Inc.
and will be retained by Intersections Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5378 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to conduct a proceeding 

to determine whether certain activities by licensees of the Commission 

are undertakings under division A of subtitle III of title 54, United 

States Code, or major Federal actions under the National Environmental 

Policy Act of 1969. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2018 

Mr. SCALISE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to conduct a proceeding to determine whether certain activities 

by licensees of the Commission are undertakings under 

division A of subtitle III of title 54, United States Code, 

or major Federal actions under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5378 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Antiquated 

3 Permitting for Infrastructure Deployments Act’’ or the 

4 ‘‘RAPID Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

6 COMMISSION REGARDING UNDERTAKINGS 

7 AND MAJOR FEDERAL ACTIONS. 

8 (a) PROCEEDING REQUIRED.—Notwithstanding sec9 tion 300320 of title 54, United States Code, or section 

10 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

11 U.S.C. 4332), not later than 180 days after the date of 

12 enactment of this Act, the Commission shall complete a 

13 proceeding to determine— 

14 (1) the classes of activities of the entities to 

15 which the Commission issues radio station licenses 

16 that do not constitute an undertaking under such 

17 section 300320; and 

18 (2) the classes of activities of the entities to 

19 which the Commission issues radio station licenses 

20 that do not constitute a major Federal action under 

21 paragraph (2)(C) of such section 102. 

22 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

23 (1) the term ‘‘Commission’’ means the Federal 

24 Communications Commission; and 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5378 IH

1 (2) the term ‘‘radio station license’’ has the 

2 meaning given the term in section 3 of the Commu3 nications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 153). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Case 3:11-cr-00006-RV Document 1 Filed 01/19/11 Page 1 of 9Case 3:11-cr-00006-RV Document 1 Filed 01/19/11 Page 2 of 9Case 3:11-cr-00006-RV Document 1 Filed 01/19/11 Page 3 of 9Case 3:11-cr-00006-RV Document 1 Filed 01/19/11 Page 4 of 9Case 3:11-cr-00006-RV Document 1 Filed 01/19/11 Page 5 of 9Case 3:11-cr-00006-RV Document 1 Filed 01/19/11 Page 6 of 9Case 3:11-cr-00006-RV Document 1 Filed 01/19/11 Page 7 of 9Case 3:11-cr-00006-RV Document 1 Filed 01/19/11 Page 8 of 9Case 3:11-cr-00006-RV Document 1 Filed 01/19/11 Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InfoSpi, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William R. Willard,
the Treasurer and CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

     1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the six month
          period ended June 30, 2008 (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies
          with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Dated: August 7, 2008

                                      /s/ William R. Willard
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      William R. Willard
                                      Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
# C_2011091EN.01001301.xml

| 23.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/13

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2011/C 91/03

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Greece

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Greece

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Greece

Subject of commemoration: The organisation of Special Olympics World Games — Athens 2011

Description of the design: The centre of the coin shows the emblem of the Games, a radiant sun, the source of life that underlines the excellence and power of the athlete that takes part in the Games. Excellence is depicted in the olive branch and power in the spiral form in the centre of the sun. Around the image is written the sign ‘XIII Special Olympics W.S.G. Athens 2011’ as well as the issuing country ‘Ελληνικη Δημοκρατια’. The mintmark is also depicted in between.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Volume of issuance: 1 million coins

Date of issue: End of the second trimester 2011

---

(1)  For the other national sides of euro circulation coins, see http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/euro/cash/coins/index_en.htm

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Guanwei Recycling Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q/A”), I, Yang Feng, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and;



2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Dated: January 30, 2012                   | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|                                          | 
|/s/ Yang Feng                             | 
|Yang Feng
        Chief Financial Officer |
No. 12298 INTHE SUPREME COURT OF 

### THE STATE OF MONTANA 1972



### THE STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Respondent,

-VS

# - KENNETH LUCERO, Defendant and Appellant.
Appeal from: District Court of the Second JudicialDistrict, Honorable John B. McClernan, Judgepresiding. Counsel of Record: For Appellant: Mark 

### P, Sullivanargued, Butte, Montana. For Respondent: Larry J. Stimatz argued, CountyAttorney, Butte, Montana. Robert L, Woodahl, Attorney General, Helena, Montana. J. C. Weingartner argued, AssistantAttorney General, Helena, Montana.

Submitted: June 13, 

### 1972Mr. Chief JusticeJames T. Harrison delivered the Opinion of the Court. This is an appeal by Kenneth Lucero from his conviction of second degree assault by a jury in Silver Bow County,Montana. While Lucero had a separate trial, itwas practically identical to the trial of Levi Campbell in the witnesses that testified and the evidence presented. Because of this similarity the statementof facts in the opinion of Statev. Campbell, Mont

# . - P.2d -1 

# - St.Rep. -1 

# - - (CauseNo. 12232)will serve for the statement of facts in this cause. Lucero, as the sole issue of his appeal, raises the question of whether venue was properly proved. This issue was also raised in the appeal of bviCampbell but unlike Campbell's case the issue is totally without merit in this case. In Campbell we held that venue like any other material fact in a criminal case could be proved by the use of either direct or circumstantial evidence. In the case of Campbell circumstantial evidence
was used to prove the venue of the crime. In this case venue was proved by the direct testimony of onewitness. The official transcript of the trial as part of the record on appeal contains the following rebuttal testimonyby John Whalen. "Q. You are the same John Whalen who previously testified in this case? A. Yes. "Q. Now this is rebuttaland Idon't want you to be repeating everything or going over too much onwhat you testified to on direct examination. If you get off the track, Imay interruptyou. Now we are talking about the events that happened at the Dutch Inn Bar,August 7, 1971. Where is the Dutch Inn? A. On the corner of Main Street and Silver Street. "Q. That's in Butte? A. Yes."Q. Silver Bow County? A. yes." Therefore we hold that venue was properly proved by the above testimony. As heretofore stated, the trial record in this cause is practically identicalwith that in Statev. Campbell,and in that cause other challengeswere made to the trial proceedings. With that inmind we have examined the record here as to each error contended in the Campbell casewhich might be applicable here, and we find that our rulings on suchmatters here would be similar to our rulings The judgment of conWe 

### concur:

-.-- 

# c 5J-1,

# ,,,,,,. ,-,,,,,,,,,+,,~lk,,---------- 

### Associate Justices
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5321 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5321

   To improve communication from Federal agencies to individuals by 
         requiring clear instructions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2018

Mr. Moulton (for himself, Mr. Meadows, and Mr. Loebsack) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To improve communication from Federal agencies to individuals by 
         requiring clear instructions, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Too Long; Didn't Read Act of 2018'' 
or the ``TL; DR Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. RESPONSIBILITIES OF FEDERAL AGENCIES.

    Not later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall develop 
and issue regulations that direct the head of each agency to provide a 
clearly marked section at the top of a communication (both hard copy 
and electronic) that the agency sends to an individual if such 
communication requires or authorizes such individual to take action. To 
the extent practicable as determined by the head of the relevant 
agency, the clearly marked section at the top of the first page shall 
include--
            (1) the action item;
            (2) if a response is required, optional, or not required;
            (3) the deadline, if applicable;
            (4) how to complete the action item; and
            (5) the agency's contact information.

SEC. 3. REPORTS TO CONGRESS.

    (a) Initial Report.--Not later than 9 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the head of each agency shall publish on the 
plain writing section of the agency's website, maintained pursuant to 
section 4(a) of the Plain Writing Act of 2010 (5 U.S.C. 301 note), a 
report that describes the agency plan for compliance with the 
requirements of this Act.
    (b) Annual Compliance Report.--Not later than 18 months after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter, the head of 
each agency shall publish on the plain writing section of the agency's 
website, maintained pursuant to section 4(a) of the Plain Writing Act 
of 2010 (5 U.S.C. 301 note), a report on agency compliance with the 
requirements of this Act.

SEC. 4. AGENCY DEFINED.

    In this Act, the term ``agency'' means an Executive agency as 
defined in section 105 of title 5, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eagle Broadband, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Weisman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  June 1, 2004

/S/David A. Weisman
David A. Weisman,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.2

               Consent of Lopez, Blevins, Bork and Associates, LLP
                         Independent Public Accountants


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-110309) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-109481,
333-106074, and 333-97913) of Eagle Broadband, Inc., of our report dated
December 7, 2004, relating to the financial statements, which appear in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

/s/  Lopez, Blevins, Bork and Associates, LLP
---------------------------------------------
Lopez, Blevins, Bork and Associates, LLP
Houston, Texas
October 11, 2004