alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ACE UNDERWRITING AGENCIES LIMITED,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00122-MP -GRJ

ALBERT S LEVINGS, LEVINGS GROUP INC,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Previously, in Doc. 7, the Plaintiff filed an amended complaint against Mr. Levings

individually, and against the corporation named Levings Group, Inc. In Doc. 12, Mr. Levings

filed a document on which was handwritten "Answer to Complaint" and which had only his

name "ALBERT S LEVINGS" in the caption as Defendant. The Court interprets this document

as Mr. Levings answer, personally, to the amended complaint. The document was filed pro se,

which is allowed for individuals. 

In Doc. 13, Mr. Levings filed a second document upon which "Answer to Complaint"

was handwritten. The caption of this document contained the following as the name of the

Defendant: "LEVINGS GROUP INC. C/O ALBERT S LEVINGS." The Court interprets this

document as the answer to the amended complaint on behalf of the corporation. No attorney has

given notice of representing the corporation, however. This is not allowed. Palazzo v. Gulf Oil

Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir.1985) (“The rule is well established that a corporation is an 
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:10-cv-00122-MP -GRJ

artificial entity that can act only through agents, cannot appear pro se, and must be represented

by counsel.”). Therefore, before the corporation can proceed, counsel must appear on its behalf. 

 Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The corporation shall have until Thursday, December 23, 2010, to obtain counsel

and inform the Court that it has done so. 

2. The Clerk is directed to refer the case back to the Court if such a notice of

appearance is filed or on December 23, 2010, if no such notice is filed.

3. The case will remain stayed until further notice of the Court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of November, 2010.

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SCOTT CARSWELL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cv486-SPM/WCS

LISA ECHEVERRI, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________/

ORDER REMANDING CLAIMS AGAINST LISA ECHEVERRI AS EXECUTIVE

DIRECTOR OF THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Florida Department of

Revenue’s motions to expedite and to dismiss or remand. Docs. 26 and 27. The

Florida Department of Revenue maintains that it has not expressly consented to

the removal of this case and has not waived its Eleventh Amendment Immunity. 

Plaintiff agrees and states that any feature or claim relating to the Florida

Department of Revenue should be remanded to the state court. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant Florida Department of Revenue’s motion to expedite and

alternative motion to remand (docs. 26 and 27) are granted. The motion to

dismiss (doc. 26) is denied as moot.

Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 53 Filed 01/05/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Plaintiffs’ claims against Lisa Echeverri, as Executive Director of the

Florida Department of Revenue, acting in her official capacity, are remanded to

the Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit in and for Leon County, Florida.

3. The Court retains jurisdiction of the claims against the other

defendants subject to Plaintiffs’ motion to remand (doc. 23).

DONE ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:10cv486-SPM/WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 53 Filed 01/05/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Algoil, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Kovalenko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|Date:  May 17, 2010 |  | By:  /s/ Andrew Kovalenko
|------------------- |  | -------------------------
|                    |  |                          
|                    |  | Andrew Kovalenko         
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Otter Tail Ag Enterprises, LLC (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Anthony Hicks, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date: 
August 16, 2010





/s/
      Anthony HicksAnthony
      HicksChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
# C_2010213EN.01001702.xml

| 6.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5864 — Avnet/Bell Micro)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 213/08

On 2 July 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5864. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5864. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

Publication of the tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2008 as required by section 3241(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U.S.C. section 3241). Tier 2 taxes on railroad employees, employers, and employee representatives are one source of funding for benefits under the Railroad Retirement Act. 

# DATES:

The tier 2 tax rates for calendar year 2008 apply to compensation paid in calendar year 2008. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David G. Mills, CC:TEGE:EOEG:ET1, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20224, Telephone Number (202) 622-0047 (not a toll-free number). 

Tier 2 Tax Rates: The tier 2 tax rate for 2008 under section 3201(b) on employees is 3.9 percent of compensation. The tier 2 tax rate for 2008 under section 3221(b) on employers is 12.1 percent of compensation. The tier 2 tax rate for 2008 under section 3211(b) on employee representatives is 12.1 percent of compensation. 

Dated: November 3, 2007. 

Nancy Marks, 

Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). 

[FR Doc. 07-5955 Filed 12-3-07; 2:29 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LYNNE LOUISE MASSIE,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:10cv405/LAC/MD

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comesonfor consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated December 1, 2010. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). 

Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to

prosecute or failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3 day of January, 2011. rd

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv405/LAC/MD
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

SIEMENS GAMESA RENEWABLE ENERGY A/S, Plaintiff

- Cross

- Appellant

v.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant

- Appellant

______________________

2023

- 1069, 2023

- 1070

______________________

Appeals from the United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts in No. 1:21

- cv

- 10216

- WGY, Judge William G. Young.

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b),

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The appeals are reactivated and voluntarily dismissed. Case: 23-1069 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 05/03/2023SIEMENS GAMESA RENEWABLE ENERGY A / S v. GENERAL

ELECTRIC COMPANY 2

(2) The parties shall bear their own costs.

May 3 , 2023
Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

IS S UED AS A MANDATE: M ay 3, 2023 Case: 23-1069 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 05/03/2023
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 8 Filed 04/06/01 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 8 Filed 04/06/01 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 8 Filed 04/06/01 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HENDRICKS & LEWIS, PLLC,

A Washington Professional

Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10mc55-SPM/WCS

GEORGE CLINTON,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated August 9, 2011 (doc. 41). The parties have been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the

report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as

follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 41) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The clerk shall enter final judgment in garnishment in Plaintiff’s

Case 4:10-mc-00055-SPM-WCS Document 42 Filed 10/13/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

favor against Garnishee, Farmers & Merchants Bank, in the amount of

$107,196.00 (account xxxxx401) and $1,278.17 (account xxxxx901).

3. The Amended Application for Issuance of Writ of Execution (doc.

33) is granted. The writ will issue separately.

4. This case is remanded to the magistrate judge for any further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:10mc55-SPM/WCS

Case 4:10-mc-00055-SPM-WCS Document 42 Filed 10/13/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2010305EN.01000102.xml

| 11.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5959 — Carlyle/NBTY)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 305/02

On 3 September 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5959. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5959. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JENSEN USA, INC.,

a North Carolina Corporation

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv256/RS-GRJ

BRIM LAUNDRY MACHINERY CO., INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

The relief requested in the Agreed Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 

38) is GRANTED. This case is dismissed with prejudice according to the terms 

of the settlement agreement. 

ORDERED on July 6, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00256-RS-GRJ Document 39 Filed 07/06/11 Page 1 of 1
{TL265647;1}

UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-00486-SPM-WCS

SCOTT CARSWELL, JULIE CARSWELL,

KENT McCOY, JANINE McCOY, and

ROBERT HOWARD, individually and as

representatives of similarly situated persons,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

LISA ECHEVERRI, as Executive Director of

the Florida Department of Revenue, acting in

her official capacity, and BP, plc; BP

PRODUCTS NORTH AMERICA INC.; BP

AMERICA INC.; BP EXPLORATION AND

PRODUCTION INC.; BP AMERICA

PRODUCTION COMPANY; TRANSOCEAN

LTD.; TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE

DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC.;

TRANSOCEAN DEEPWATER, INC.;

TRANSOCEAN HOLDINGS, LLC; TRITON

ASSET LEASING GMBH; HALLIBURTON

ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; CAMERON

INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION f/k/a

COOPER CAMERON CORPORATION.;

ANADARKO PETROLEUM

CORPORATION.; ANADARKO E & P

COMPANY, L.P.; MOEX OFFSHORE 2007,

L.L.C.; M-I, LLC; DRIL-QUIP, INC.; MITSUI

OIL EXPLORATION; and HYUNDAI HEAVY

INDUSTRIES CO. LTD., INC.,

Defendants.

____________________________________________/

BP DEFENDANTS’ JOINDER IN NOTICE OF REMOVAL

Defendants BP Products North America Inc., BP America Inc., BP Exploration &

Production Inc., and BP America Production Company (collectively, “BP Defendants”),

Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 21 Filed 11/22/10 Page 1 of 2
{TL265647;1} 2

appearing specially through counsel and expressly reserving all defenses, including without

limitation all defenses under Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby join in the

Notice of Removal filed by Defendants Transocean Offshore Deepwater, Inc., Triton Asset

Leasing GMBH, Transocean Deepwater, Inc., and Transocean Holdings, LLC (Doc. 1).

OF COUNSEL:

Richard C. Godfrey, P.C.

John T. Hickey Jr., P.C.

J. Andrew Langan, P.C. (admitted N.D. Fla.)

Wendy L. Bloom (admitted N.D. Fla.)

Kirkland & Ellis LLP

300 North LaSalle Street

Chicago, IL 60654

312-862-2000 (Tel)

312-862-2200 (Fax)

Attorneys for the BP Defendants

AKERMAN SENTERFITT

106 East College Avenue, Suite 1200

Tallahassee, FL 32301

Phone: (850) 224-9634

Fax: (850) 222-0103

By: s/ Thomas A. Range

J. Riley Davis

Florida Bar Number: 118121

Thomas A. Range

Florida Bar Number: 568651

Attorneys for the BP Defendants

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing has been filed on November 22, 2010 via

CM/ECF, which will send a copy of this filing via electronic mail to all attorneys of record.

s/ Thomas A. Range

Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 21 Filed 11/22/10 Page 2 of 2
(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 of Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Frank Abbott, Financial Director of the Company, certify, that:
  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
    Frank Abbott Chief Financial Officer Financial Director
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States Institute of Peace

# AGENCY:

United States Institute of Peace.

*Date/Time:*                         Tuesday, December 4, 2007, 9 a.m.-11 a.m.                    

*Location:*                         1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036-3011.                    

*Status:*                         Closed Meeting—Pursuant to Subsection (c) of Section 552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in subsection 1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, Public Law 98-525.                    

*Agenda:*                         December 4, 2007 Board Meeting; Consideration of Building Committee Recommendation.                    

*Contact:*                         Susan F. Douglas, HQ Project Office, Telephone: (202) 429-7172.                    

Dated: November 15, 2007.

Patricia P. Thomson,

Executive Vice President, United States Institute of Peace.

[FR Doc. 07-5818  Filed 11-20-07; 10:31 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TECHSHELL, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv154/RS-MD

HARD CANDY CASES, LLC;

SPECK PRODUCT DESIGN, INC.;

IPEARL, INC.; XGEAR, LLC;

CASE-MATE GEORGIA, LLC;

CASE-MATE INTERNATIONAL, LLC;

and CASE-MATE RETAIL, INC.,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Defendant’s Notice of Substitution Of Counsel On Behalf Of Hard

Candy Cases, LLC (Doc. 25), which shall be construed as a motion for withdrawal and

substitution of attorneys pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 11.1(F). 

IT IS ORDERED that Robert H. Thornburg, Ryan Thomas Santurri, and Allen,

Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist are granted leave to withdraw as attorneys of record

for Defendant Hard Candy Cases, LLC. Stuart J. West and West & Associates, a

Professional Corporation, are substituted as attorneys of record for Defendant Hard

Candy Cases, LLC.

ORDERED on September 2, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE