alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011094EN.01000102.xml

| 26.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6138 — Banque Privée 1818/Messine Participations/Rothschild Assurance et Courtage/Rothschild & CIE Gestion/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 94/02

On 21 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6138. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6138. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### LEVINE v. DONATHAN

No. 34 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 730.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 April 1980.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SYLVESTER JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 5:10cv198/MCR/MD

P. SEXTON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on October 28, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of December, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANTOINE MEDDLER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv532-SPM/WCS

EDWIN G. BUSS, st al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated December 5, 2011 (doc. 31). Plaintiff has been afforded

an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and

recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should

be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 31) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 22) is granted.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment in Defendants’ favor and close this 

Case 4:10-cv-00532-SPM-WCS Document 33 Filed 02/02/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of February, 2012.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 4:10cv532-SPM/WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00532-SPM-WCS Document 33 Filed 02/02/12 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BRANDON HATCHER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-10/RS-EMT

ARROWHEAD RV SALES,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Notice of Resolution (Doc. 15). Pursuant to N.D. Fla. 

Loc. 16.2 it is ordered: 

1. The case is dismissed from the active docket of the court. 

2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves 

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this 

Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative purposes, 

and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is direct to 

close the case in its entirety for all purposes. 

ORDERED on September 2, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00010-RS-EMT Document 16 Filed 09/02/11 Page 1 of 1
Case 4:11-cv-00002-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/06/11 Page 1 of 10
Case 4:11-cv-00002-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/06/11 Page 2 of 10
Case 4:11-cv-00002-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/06/11 Page 3 of 10
Case 4:11-cv-00002-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/06/11 Page 4 of 10
Case 4:11-cv-00002-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/06/11 Page 5 of 10
Case 4:11-cv-00002-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/06/11 Page 6 of 10
Case 4:11-cv-00002-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/06/11 Page 7 of 10
Case 4:11-cv-00002-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/06/11 Page 8 of 10
Case 4:11-cv-00002-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/06/11 Page 9 of 10
Case 4:11-cv-00002-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/06/11 Page 10 of 10
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 11, 2019

a1204 

# Order

Clerk December 11, 2019

157692

ERIKA EASTER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 157692

COA: 335815

Eaton CC: 15

- 001492

- NI

PROGRESSIVE MARATHON INSURANCE

COMPANY and MARK ALLEN HOCHSTETLER,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

By order of September 12, 2018, t he application for leave to appeal the March 20,

2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in Dye

v Esurance Prop & Cas Ins Co (Docket No. 155784). On order of the Court, the case

having been decided on July 11, 2019, 504 Mich 167 (2019), the application is again

considered. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we

REVERSE Part I.A

. of the Court of Appeals judgment for the reasons stated in Dye

. We

REMAND this case to the Eaton Circuit Cou rt for further proceedings not inconsistent

with this order. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the remaining questions presented sho uld be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , J., did not participate due to her prior relationship with Garan Lucow

Miller, P.C.
# C_2011223EN.01000301.xml

| 29.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 July 2011

2011/C 223/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4260 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4497 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87390 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0735 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1437 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7245 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,215 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7096 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0150 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2505 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,3955 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,2931 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3521 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1110 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6356 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7169 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 499,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5543 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1874 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4604 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 125,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2145 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,176 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,4050 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,409 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2277 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6187 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,8840 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4260

JPY

Japanese yen

110,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4497

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87390

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0735

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1437

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7245

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,215

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7096

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0150

RON

Romanian leu

4,2505

TRY

Turkish lira

2,3955

AUD

Australian dollar

1,2931

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3521

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1110

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6356

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7169

KRW

South Korean won

1 499,62

ZAR

South African rand

9,5543

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1874

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4604

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 125,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2145

PHP

Philippine peso

60,176

RUB

Russian rouble

39,4050

THB

Thai baht

42,409

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2277

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6187

INR

Indian rupee

62,8840

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2011005EN.01000701.xml

| 8.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 January 2011

2011/C 5/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2961 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 108,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4503 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83830 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9378 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2512 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7260 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,565 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,27 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7009 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8768 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2583 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0344 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3060 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2867 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0738 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7112 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6824 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 458,71 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,8673 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5906 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4035 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 703,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9784 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,455 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,8538 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,423 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,1917 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,8369 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 58,9200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2961

JPY

Japanese yen

108,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4503

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83830

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9378

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2512

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7260

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,565

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,27

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7009

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8768

RON

Romanian leu

4,2583

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0344

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3060

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2867

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0738

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7112

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6824

KRW

South Korean won

1 458,71

ZAR

South African rand

8,8673

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5906

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4035

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 703,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9784

PHP

Philippine peso

57,455

RUB

Russian rouble

39,8538

THB

Thai baht

39,423

BRL

Brazilian real

2,1917

MXN

Mexican peso

15,8369

INR

Indian rupee

58,9200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JENNIFER LOUISE ROZIER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv509-SPM/WCS

NATHANIEL GALLON

and GREG REED, 

Defendants.

__________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated April 6, 2011 (doc. 12). Plaintiff has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and

recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should

be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 12) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief

Case 4:10-cv-00509-SPM-WCS Document 13 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

may be granted.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of May, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 4:10cv509-SPM/WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00509-SPM-WCS Document 13 Filed 05/23/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 3:11cr20/MCR

GABRIEL JURON BOLDEN

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there has been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(2), the plea of guilty

of the defendant, GABRIEL JURON BOLDEN, to the two count indictment against him is

hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of April, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2011210EN.01002301.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/23

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6247 — KKR/Versatel)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 210/08

On 7 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6247. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6247. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2009199EN.01000502.xml

| 25.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5590 — 3i Group/H.I.G. Capital/Volnay B.V.)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 199/03

On 17 August 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5590. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5590. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DERREL THOMAS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No: 4:11-cv-46-MP-GRJ

JORAM PEREZ,

OFFICER BRADSHAW, and

OFFICER BOCCACCIO,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

O R D E R

On January 25, 2012 the summons directed to Defendant Joram Perez was

returned by the United States Marshal as unexecuted. (Doc. 35.) The Florida

Department of Corrections previously provided a Notice to the Court that the forwarding

address for Defendant “Joram Perez” had been provided in confidence to the United

States Marshals Service (“USMS”). (Doc. 27.) The Court then ordered the USMS to

personally serve Perez at the address provided in the Notice. (Doc. 30.) The return of

service reflects that the USMS twice attempted to personally serve Perez at this

address, but the USMS was advised by a resident at that address that Perez does not

reside there. (Doc. 35.)

Despite being granted permission to proceed as a pauper in this case, Plaintiff is

ultimately responsible for serving Defendant Joram Perez. Accordingly, the Court shall

grant Plaintiff an opportunity to provide an address for Defendant Joram Perez to the

Clerk of Court. Plaintiff is warned, however, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) “if service

Case 4:11-cv-00046-MP-GRJ Document 36 Filed 01/31/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days after the

filing of the complaint, the court, upon motion or on its own initiative after notice to the

plaintiff, shall dismiss the action without prejudice as to that defendant or order that

service be made within a specified time.” 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff shall provide an address for Defendant Joram Perez to the Clerk

of Court on or before February 17, 2012.

2. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to the

district judge that Defendant Joram Perez be dismissed from this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31 day of January 2012. st

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00046-MP-GRJ Document 36 Filed 01/31/12 Page 2 of 2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN XICARA-COTOC,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71134

Agency No. A097-762-975

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2012** 

Before: B. FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Juan Xicara-Cotoc, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from the

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding

of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review questions of

FILED

MAR 14 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
10-72915

law de novo, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except to

the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing

statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). 

We review for substantial evidence factual findings. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453

F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding that Xicara-Cotoc failed

to establish that he was or would be persecuted on account of a protected ground. 

See Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 855 (9th Cir. 2009); Santos-Lemus v.

Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 744-46 (9th Cir. 2008) (applicant’s proposed social group

of young Salvadoran men who resist gang violence lacks both particularity and

social visibility). Accordingly, Xicara-Cotoc’s asylum and withholding of removal

claims fail. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Case 1:09-cv-00175-SPM-AK   Document 1   Filed 08/14/09   Page 1 of 3

Case 1:09-cv-00175-SPM-AK   Document 1   Filed 08/14/09   Page 2 of 3

Case 1:09-cv-00175-SPM-AK   Document 1   Filed 08/14/09   Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MICHAEL RYAN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:11cv5-SPM/GRJ

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

OF NORTH AMERICA, a foreign

corporation,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to the Notice of Settlement (doc. 13) and Northern District of

Florida Local Rule 16.2(D), it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

2. The Court retains jurisdiction for a period of 60 days, during which

time any party may move to reopen for good cause shown.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of April, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge