alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 28 (Monday, February 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 6577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-607]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 26, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), IMS Global Learning 
Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Learning Objects, Inc., Washington, DC; ACT, Iowa City, 
IA; Compass Knowledge, Orlando, FL; Elsevier, Inc., St. Louis, MO; 
Harcourt Education, Orlando, FL; Jenzabar, Cambridge, MA; Moodle, East 
Perth, Western Australia, Australia; and Ucompass.com, Tallahassee, FL 
have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Global Learning Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On April 7, 2000, Global Learning Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 
55283).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 
28, 2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 30, 2006 (71 FR 63358).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-607 Filed 2-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# C_2009145EN.01000901.xml

| 25.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 June 2009

2009/C 145/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4029 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4447 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0260 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5183 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0090 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,160 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6970 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5320 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2268 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1829 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7566 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6105 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8725 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1806 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0401 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 799,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2993 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5857 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3147 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 564,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9564 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,514 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,8104 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,888 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7652 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6351 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,0830 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4029

JPY

Japanese yen

133,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4447

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84930

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0260

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5183

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0090

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,160

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6970

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5320

RON

Romanian leu

4,2268

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1829

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7566

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6105

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8725

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1806

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0401

KRW

South Korean won

1 799,18

ZAR

South African rand

11,2993

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5857

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3147

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 564,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9564

PHP

Philippine peso

67,514

RUB

Russian rouble

43,8104

THB

Thai baht

47,888

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7652

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6351

INR

Indian rupee

68,0830

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MICHAEL L. UNION,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv125-RH/WCS

JORGE A. MONTENEGRO et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER FOR TRANSFER

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 27. No objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida, Fort Myers Division. The clerk must take all steps necessary to

effect the transfer.

SO ORDERED on December 3, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
4
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ALBERT W. CARTER, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10cv165-MP-GRJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with

Prejudice. (Doc. 22). Unless a notice of dismissal is filed before the defendant serves an

answer or motion for summary judgment or a stipulation is signed by all parties who have

appeared, the action may be dismissed at the plaintiff’s request only by court order. See

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Here, the defendant has answered the complaint but has not signed

a stipulation of dismissal. Nevertheless, the Court finds that dismissal is appropriate.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed with prejudice at the plaintiff’s request pursuant to

Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

2. The Clerk is directed to close the file, but the Court retains jurisdiction for

sixty (60) days pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 16.2(D).

DONE and ORDERED this 25th day of January, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00165-MP-GRJ Document 23 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:11-cr-2-SPM/WCS

MICHAEL FORD,

 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation (doc. 25) of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of

the Defendant, MICHAEL FORD, to Counts One and Two of the Indictment is hereby

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this fourteenth day of April, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of the Registrant
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Douglas
      A. Dyer, the President and the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
      Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 14, 2008


By:
            /s/
              DOUGLAS A. DYERDouglas
                A. Dyer
              President
                and Director
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
# C_2011032EN.01001601.xml

| 1.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/16

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 32/10

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 11.11.2010 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 11.11.2010-31.12.2010 |
| Member State | France |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/1/2B. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | International waters of I and IIb |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 810989 |

Date and time of closure

11.11.2010

Duration

11.11.2010-31.12.2010

Member State

France

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/1/2B.

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Gadus morhua

Zone

International waters of I and IIb

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

810989

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. 52A23

Filed 22 March 2024
JAMES W. BRADSHAW; CARLA O. BRADSHAW; RESORT RETAIL ASSOCIATES, INC.; E.C. BROADFOOT; CHRISTINA DUNN CHA N DRA ; THOMAS F. EGAN; CH ARLES EGGERT; MARK P. GARSIDE; DR. JAMES J. GREEN , JR. ; ROBERT K. GRUNEWALD; RONALD HOLMES; DAVID LAUCK; CURT W. LEMKAU, JR.; EVAN MIDDLETON; JOSHUA M. NELSON; CHRISTIAN C. NUGENT; REGINA H. PAKRADOONI, as Executrix of the Estate of PETER B. PAKRADOONI , deceased ; FORD PERRY; MARCELLO G. PORCELLI; ADAN RENDON; RICHARD H. STEVENSON; PAUL STOKES; LAWRENCE J. THEIL; R. MITCHELL WICKHAM; WILLIAM H. WILLIAMSON , III ; WILLIAM K. WRIGHT , JR. ; ALEX M. WOLF; CHAFFIN FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; and SOLARIS CAPITAL LLC

v. STEPHEN E. MAIDEN; MAIDEN CAPITAL, LLC; and SS&C TECHNOLOGIES, INC., successor by merger to SS&C FUND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, LLC (a/k/a SS&C FUND SERVICES)

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the unpublished decision of a
divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 287 N.C. App. 393 , 2022 WL 17985671 (2022) , affirming orders and opinions dated 10 August 2015, 1 September 2020, and 15
September 2020 , and entered on 20 August 2015, 4 September 2020, and 30
September 2020, respectively, by Chief Business Court Judge Louis A. Bledsoe III in
Superior Court , Mecklenburg County , after the case was designated a mandatory
complex business case by the Chief Justice pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 45.4(b) . Heard
in the Supreme Cour t on 14 February 2024.

Lewis & Roberts, PLLC, by Matthew D. Quinn and James A. Roberts, III, and Mauney PLLC

, by Gary V. Mauney
, for plaintiff

- appellants.B RADSHAW V

. M AIDEN
Opinion of the Court

- 2

- Alston & Bird LLP, by Ryan P. Ethridge and Michael A. Kaeding ; and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton, & Garrison LLP, by Rober A. Atkins, pro hac vice, and Jeffrey J. Recher , pro hac vice, for defendant

- appellee SS&C Technologies, Inc.

PER CURIAM

.
Justice DIETZ did n ot participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting
to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands
without precedential value

. See Batson v. Coastal Res. Comm’n , 385 N.C. 328, 892
S.E.2d 589 (2023) (per curiam) (affirming by an equally divided vote a Court of
Appeals decision withou t precedential value).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the annual report of
One eCommerce Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, John Welch, Principal Executive Officer, certify to my
knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods expressed in the Report.




A certification furnished pursuant to
this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange
Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the
small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.





Date: May
14, 2010
 /s/ JOHN
      WELCHJohn
      Welch
                Principal
      Executive Officer
# C_2009263EN.01002101.xml

| 5.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/21

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to open winding-up proceedings against G.E. Skourtis Anonimi Eteria Yenikon Asfalion

(Publication pursuant to Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

(Publication pursuant to Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

2009/C 263/10

| Insurance undertaking | G.E. Skourtis Anonimi Eteria Yenikon Asfalion, head office in Athens, odos Filellinon 1, GREECE. |
| --- | --- |
| Date, entry into force and type of decision | Decision No 156 of the Board of Directors of the Private Insurance Supervisory Committee of 16 and 21 September 2009 relating to the definitive withdrawal of the company's operating licence and its winding-up.
  Entry into force: 21 September 2009. |
| Competent authorities | Private Insurance Supervisory Committee |
| Ipatias 5 |
| 105 57 Athens |
| GREECE |

Insurance undertaking

G.E. Skourtis Anonimi Eteria Yenikon Asfalion, head office in Athens, odos Filellinon 1, GREECE.

Date, entry into force and type of decision

Decision No 156 of the Board of Directors of the Private Insurance Supervisory Committee of 16 and 21 September 2009 relating to the definitive withdrawal of the company's operating licence and its winding-up.

Entry into force: 21 September 2009.

Competent authorities

Private Insurance Supervisory Committee

Ipatias 5

105 57 Athens

GREECE

Supervisory authorities

| Private Insurance Supervisory Committee |
| --- |
| Ipatias 5 |
| 105 57 Athens |
| GREECE |

Private Insurance Supervisory Committee

Ipatias 5

105 57 Athens

GREECE

Appointed liquidator

| Alevromitis Nikolaos (winding-up supervisor) |
| --- |
| Ayion Pandon 63-67 |
| 176 72 Kallithea |
| GREECE |

Alevromitis Nikolaos (winding-up supervisor)

Ayion Pandon 63-67

176 72 Kallithea

GREECE

Applicable law

Greek law; Articles 3(3), 7 to 9, 10, 12(a) and 17(a) to 17(c) of Legislative Decree No 400/1970.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RANDOLPH BAGGETT,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv347/LAC/EMT

COLONEL SCHWARTZ, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the instant civil rights case,

filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, without prejudice (Doc. 14).

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that an action may be dismissed without an order of the court

by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before the adverse party serves an answer or files a motion

for summary judgment. Because Defendants have not yet been served in the instant case, it is clear

that Plaintiff is automatically entitled to a voluntary dismissal at this time.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 14) be GRANTED and this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.
Page 2 of 2

At Pensacola, Florida, this 16th day of September 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No.: 3:10cv347/LAC/EMT
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6560** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SHELLY WAYNE MARTIN, a/k/a Wayne , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. J. Frederick Motz , Senior District Judge. ( 1:04

- cr - 00029

- JFM

- 3; 1:16

- cv - 00109

- JFM )

Submitted : September 13, 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Shelly Wayne Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon, Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorneys, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shelly Wayne Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s order s denying Martin’s self

- styled “Motion Under the Declaratory Judgment Act of 28 U.S.C. § 2201,” construing this motion as a 28 U .S.C. § 2255 ( 2012) motion and dismissing it for lack of jurisdiction because it was a successive § 2255 motion for which Martin had not received prefiling authorization, and denying Martin’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. The or der s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U .S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.3 We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Martin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of a ppealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 99.1**

**Certificationof CEO Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C.Section 1350,**

**As AdoptedPursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CleanEnergy Combustion Systems, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, R. Dirk Stinson, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:

> 
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in  all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.

 
*/s/R. Dirk Stinson*

R.Dirk Stinson

ChiefExecutive Officer and President

March31, 2003

 
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extentrequired by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-80,998-01

EX P ARTE TYRELL A. JACK SON, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. C-371-009751- 1041767-A IN THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT

F ROM TARRA NT COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Te x . C ri m . App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag gravated assault and sentenc ed to fourtee n year s’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Jack

son v. State , No. 02-09-00258- CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2010, no pet.). Applicant contends, among other things, that his appellate counsel rende red ineff ec t ive assistance
. Appellate counsel filed an aff idavit with the trial court. Ba sed on that aff idavit, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fac t and conclusions of law and rec ommended that we grant Applicant
an out-of-time petition for discretionar y revie w. Ex parte W

ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App.2

1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the Second Court of Ap p eals in case number 02-09- 00258-CR that aff

irmed his conviction in cause number 1041767D from the 371st District Court of Tarr ant County
. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionar y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the dateon which this Court’s mandate issues. Applicant’s rema ining claims are dismiss ed. Ex parte Torres , 943 S.W .2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Deliver ed: Marc h 19, 2014 Do not publish