alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

MICHAEL D. TURNER

NO. 2022 KW 0414

JULY 5, 2022

In Re: Michael D. Turner, applying for supervisory writs, 

19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton

Rouge, No. 12- 93- 0388. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED. The district court is ordered to act on

relator' s " Motion to Lift Stay," filed February 18, 2022, on or

before August 2, 2022. A copy of the district court' s action

shall be filed in this court on or before August 10, 2022. 

PMc

JEW

CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

C" < 7"" - L

j

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Exhibit 99(d)

Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC Consolidated

Adjusted
EBITDA Reconciliation



|                                                                    |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ----- | -
|                                                                    |  | Year Ended December 31, |      
|                                                                    |  | 2010                    |       |   | 2009 |  
|                                                                    |  | (millions of dollars)   |      
|Net income                                                          |  | $                       | 213   |   |      | $ | 74    |  
|Income tax benefit                                                  |  |                         | (42   | ) |      |   | (93   | )
|Interest expense and related charges                                |  |                         | 315   |   |      |   | 279   |  
|Depreciation and amortization                                       |  |                         |      |   |      |   |      |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |  
|EBITDA                                                              |  | $                       | 486   |   |      | $ | 260   |  
|                                                                    |  |                        
|Oncor Holdings distributions                                        |  |                         | 169   |   |      |   | 216   |  
|Interest income                                                     |  |                         | (209  | ) |      |   | (4    | )
|Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax)        |  |                         | (277  | ) |      |   | (256  | )
|Other                                                               |  |                         |      |   |      |   | (1    | )
|                                                                    |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Adjusted EBITDA per Incurrence Covenant                             |  | $                       | 169   |   |      | $ | 215   |  
|Add Oncor Adjusted EBITDA (reduced by Oncor Holdings distributions) |  | $                       | 1,354 |   |      | $ | 1,123 |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |  
|Adjusted EBITDA per Restricted Payments Covenants                   |  | $                       | 1,523 |   |      | $ | 1,338 |  
|                                                                    |  |                         |       |   |      |   |       |
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-11-000005524-OCT-201108:36 AM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ISABELLA P. WARD,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-335-RS-CJK

MICHAEL B. DONLEY, SECRETARY

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Notice of Settlement (Doc. 23) and the Mediation Report (Doc. 24). 

Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 16.2(D) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1), IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

2. In the event that the settlement between these parties is not consummated, the 

Court reserves jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within 60 days of 

the date of this Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and 

reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file for administrative purposes, and upon the 

expiration of 60 days without activity, the clerk is directed to close the case in 

its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on November 1, 2011.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00335-RS-CJK Document 25 Filed 11/01/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:09cr53-SPM

LUIS ROLANDO GARCIA-ZUNIGA,

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One and Two of this

indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing

Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a

report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties

consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it

is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 4:09cr53-SPM

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 4:09cr53-SPM

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on October 13, 2009. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

OBADIAH SAVOY DILLARD,

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:11cv21-SPM/GRJ

LAWANDA GOODMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 15) which recommends that

Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has been afforded an opportunity to

file objections. No objections were filed. I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation is accurate.

The Court notes that after the Magistrate Judge issued the Report and

Recommendation, Plaintiff filed a Third and Fourth Amended Complaint with

exhibits. Upon review, the Court finds that the amended complaints do not set

forth new information or arguments that affect the accuracy of the Report and

Recommendation. Accordingly, I have determined that the Report and

Case 1:11-cv-00021-SPM-GRJ Document 26 Filed 01/04/12 Page 1 of 2
Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 15) is

adopted and incorporated by reference into this order; and

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice.

3. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

-2-

Case 1:11-cv-00021-SPM-GRJ Document 26 Filed 01/04/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DESHAWN LOVETT HUNTER,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:10cv431-WS

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER YOUNG,

et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER DIRECTING TRANSFER OF CASE

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation

docketed October 12, 2010. See Doc. 4. The magistrate judge recommends that

the action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District

of Georgia, Atlanta Division. The plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and

recommendation. 

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 4) is adopted 
Page 2 of 2

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The clerk shall TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, for all further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of November , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 01, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, October 01, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A25I0036. PAINT BOOTH DOCTORS, LLC d/b/a AYERS CONSTRUCTION et al v. 

MOHAMED NAGI.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2020SV3074
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 57595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4990]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: November 6, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817. (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Paul A. Amstad, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, DHHS/National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B 
Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-402-7098, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8efeefe3fdfaefeacee0e7efe7eaa0e0e7e6a0e9e1f8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb8b9a96888f9a9fbb95929a929fd5959293d59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS).

    Dated: October 3, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4990 Filed 10-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CECIL MCCRAY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00196-SPM -GRJ

CHIEF DOUGLAS, A GRAVES, ALTON HORNE,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in

Forma Pauperis. (Doc. 2). Plaintiff must have an authorized official at the Levy County

Jail sign the Prisoner Consent Form. Plaintiff should show this order to the jail officials

if they continue to maintain that they do not have to sign anything.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Ruling will be deferred on the motion for IFP until after the Prisoner Consent

Form is signed and returned.

2. The Clerk shall mail another Prisoner Consent Form to Plaintiff, which he

shall sign and have an official sign and return on or before October 15, 2010.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2010. 

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
# C_2011070EN.01000401.xml

| 4.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 March 2011

2011/C 70/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3850 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4564 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85130 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7576 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2844 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7145 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,208 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7045 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9826 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2045 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2243 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3609 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3469 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7889 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8581 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7578 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 553,71 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5409 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0995 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4125 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 196,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1979 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,068 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,0585 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,256 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2985 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7066 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,3840 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3850

JPY

Japanese yen

113,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4564

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85130

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7576

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2844

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7145

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,208

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7045

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9826

RON

Romanian leu

4,2045

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2243

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3609

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3469

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7889

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8581

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7578

KRW

South Korean won

1 553,71

ZAR

South African rand

9,5409

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0995

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4125

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 196,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1979

PHP

Philippine peso

60,068

RUB

Russian rouble

39,0585

THB

Thai baht

42,256

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2985

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7066

INR

Indian rupee

62,3840

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

vs. Case No. 3:10cr107/MCR

RENE ORTEGA CALDERON

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P.,

and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts I and II of the Indictment. After cautioning and examining

the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that

the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the offenses charged are supported by an

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offenses. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have

sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: December 3, 2010 /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

twenty four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A

copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No. 3:10cr107/LAC
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10615 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

− Appellee,

versus NICOLAS SEBASTIAN,

Defendant

− Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:15 -CR- 93 -1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nicholas Sebastian

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 3, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10615 Document: 00514101817 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2017No. 16

- 10615

2 has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011) , as well as a supplemental brief

. Se bastian ha s not filed a

response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief s and the relevant portions of the rec

ord. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non

frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-10615 Document: 00514101817 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/03/2017
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 208 (Monday, October 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 61212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5368]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Notice of Rate for Use in Federal Debt Collection and Discount 
and Rebate Evaluation

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Treasury.

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 11 of the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as 
amended, (31 U.S.C. 3717), the Secretary of the Treasury is responsible 
for computing and publishing the percentage rate to be used in 
assessing interest charges for outstanding debts owed to the 
Government. Treasury's Cash Management Requirements (TFM Volume I, Part 
6, Chapter 8000) prescribe use of this rate by agencies as a comparison 
point in evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a cash discount. In 
addition, 5 CFR 1315.8 of the Prompt Payment rule on ``Rebates'' 
requires that this rate be used in determining when agencies should pay 
purchase card invoices when the card issuer offers a rebate. Notice is 
hereby given that the applicable rate is 5.00 percent for calendar year 
2008.

DATES: The rate will be in effect for the period beginning on January 
1, 2008, and ending on December 31, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries should be directed to the 
Agency Enterprise Solutions Division, Financial Management Service, 
Department of the Treasury, 401 14th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20227 
(Telephone: 202-874-6650).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The rate reflects the current value of funds 
to the Treasury for use in connection with Federal Cash Management 
systems and is based on investment rates set for purposes of Public Law 
95-147, 91 Stat. 1227. Computed each year by averaging Treasury Tax and 
Loan (TT&L) investment rates for the 12-month period ending every 
September 30, rounded to the nearest whole percentage, for 
applicability effective each January 1, the rate is subject to 
quarterly revisions if the annual average, on a moving basis, changes 
by 2 percentage points. The rate in effect for the calendar year 2008 
reflects the average investment rates for the 12-month period that 
ended September 30, 2007.

    Dated: October 23, 2007.
Shery Morrow,
Assistant Commissioner, Federal Finance.
[FR Doc. 07-5368 Filed 10-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M