alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. R. 518 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

An Act 

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to exclude power supply circuits, 

drivers, and devices designed to be connected to, and power, light-emitting diodes 

or organic light-emitting diodes providing illumination from energy conservation 

standards for external power supplies, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘EPS Improvement Act of 2017’’. 

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS TO 

CERTAIN EXTERNAL POWER SUPPLIES. 

(a) DEFINITION OF EXTERNAL POWER SUPPLY.—Section 

321(36)(A) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 

6291(36)(A)) is amended— 

(1) by striking the subparagraph designation and all that 

follows through ‘‘The term’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(A) EXTERNAL POWER SUPPLY.— 

‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(ii) EXCLUSION.—The term ‘external power supply’ 

does not include a power supply circuit, driver, or 

device that is designed exclusively to be connected 

to, and power— 

‘‘(I) light-emitting diodes providing illumination; 

‘‘(II) organic light-emitting diodes providing 

illumination; or 

‘‘(III) ceiling fans using direct current motors.’’. 

(b) STANDARDS FOR LIGHTING POWER SUPPLY CIRCUITS.— 

(1) DEFINITION.—Section 340(2)(B) of the Energy Policy 

and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6311(2)(B)) is amended by 

striking clause (v) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(v) electric lights and lighting power supply circuits;’’. 

(2) ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARD FOR CERTAIN EQUIPMENT.—Section 342 of the Energy Policy and Conservation 

Act (42 U.S.C. 6313) is amended by adding at the end the 

following: 

‘‘(g) LIGHTING POWER SUPPLY CIRCUITS.—If the Secretary, 

acting pursuant to section 341(b), includes as covered equipment 

solid state lighting power supply circuits, drivers, or devices 

described in section 321(36)(A)(ii), the Secretary may prescribe 

under this part, not earlier than 1 year after the date on which 
H. R. 518—2 

a test procedure has been prescribed, an energy conservation 

standard for such equipment.’’. 

(c) TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS.— 

(1) Section 321(6)(B) of the Energy Policy and Conservation 

Act (42 U.S.C. 6291(6)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘(19)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘(20)’’. 

(2) Section 324 of the Energy Policy and Conservation 

Act (42 U.S.C. 6294) is amended by striking ‘‘(19)’’ each place 

it appears in each of subsections (a)(3), (b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and 

(b)(5) and inserting ‘‘(20)’’. 

(3) Section 325(l) of the Energy Policy and Conservation 

Act (42 U.S.C. 6295(l)) is amended by striking ‘‘paragraph 

(19)’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘paragraph (20)’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JENSEN USA, INC., a North

Carolina corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv256/RS-GRJ

BRIM LAUNDRY MACHINERY CO.,

INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________

BRIM LAUNDRY MACHINERY CO.,

INC.,

Counter-Claimant,

vs.

JENSEN USA, INC., a North

Carolina corporation,

Counter-Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Notice of Settlement (Doc. 32). Pursuant to Local Rule

16.2(D), it is ordered:

1. This case is dismissed from the active docket of the court.

2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this Order, to

amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative
purposes, and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is directed to

close the case in its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on March 8, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JENSEN USA, INC.,

A North Carolina corporation,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-256/RS-GRJ

BRIM LAUNDRY MACHINERY CO., INC.,

Defendant. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

The relief requested in Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Responsive Pleading (Doc. 7) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its response no later 

than December 20, 2010. 

ORDERED on December 2, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2011255EN.01000101.xml

| 31.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6238 — RREEF/SMAG/OHL/Arenales)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 255/01

On 10 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6238. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6238. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Algoil, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Kovalenko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|Date:  May 17, 2010 |  | By:  /s/ Andrew Kovalenko                                                
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |                                                                          
|                    |  | Andrew Kovalenko                                                         
|                    |  | Chairman, President Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer)
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the period ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark M. Wellesley-Wood, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/MARK M. WELLESLEY-WOODMark M. Wellesley-Wood
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
September 10, 2003


---

QuickLinks
# C_2010300EN.01000201.xml

| 6.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 November 2010

2010/C 300/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4084 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,41 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4536 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86790 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2910 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3546 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1190 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,585 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,71 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7097 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9150 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2910 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9674 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3865 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4100 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9170 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7747 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8106 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 561,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5882 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3752 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3560 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 541,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3422 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,043 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,3100 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,741 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3610 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2163 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,0000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4084

JPY

Japanese yen

114,41

DKK

Danish krone

7,4536

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86790

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2910

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3546

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1190

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,585

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,71

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7097

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9150

RON

Romanian leu

4,2910

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9674

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3865

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4100

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9170

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7747

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8106

KRW

South Korean won

1 561,00

ZAR

South African rand

9,5882

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3752

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3560

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 541,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3422

PHP

Philippine peso

60,043

RUB

Russian rouble

43,3100

THB

Thai baht

41,741

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3610

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2163

INR

Indian rupee

62,0000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2010327EN.01001501.xml

| 4.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/15

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 December 2010

2010/C 327/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3246 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4529 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84800 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1265 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3143 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0050 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,018 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,03 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7097 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9952 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3073 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9813 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3508 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3269 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2846 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7519 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7315 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 503,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,1605 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8262 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3775 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 924,57 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1698 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,062 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,4745 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,811 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2530 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3389 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,7360 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3246

JPY

Japanese yen

110,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4529

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84800

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1265

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3143

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0050

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,018

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,03

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7097

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9952

RON

Romanian leu

4,3073

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9813

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3508

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3269

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2846

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7519

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7315

KRW

South Korean won

1 503,92

ZAR

South African rand

9,1605

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8262

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3775

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 924,57

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1698

PHP

Philippine peso

58,062

RUB

Russian rouble

41,4745

THB

Thai baht

39,811

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2530

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3389

INR

Indian rupee

59,7360

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RONALD FARRIS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11cv43/RS-EMT

CITY OF SNEADS, FLORIDA, and

BRETT PRESTON, Individually,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Notice of Resolution (Doc. 16). Pursuant to Local Rule

16.2(D), it is ordered:

1. This case is dismissed from the active docket of the court.

2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this Order, to

amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative

purposes, and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is directed to

close the case in its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on August 30, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00043-RS-EMT Document 18 Filed 08/30/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MACE LAVAL CAMPBELL,

Petitioner,

v. 3:11cv2-WS/MD

SAM CULPEPPER,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

September 1, 2011. See Doc. 18. The magistrate judge recommends that the

petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. The petitioner has filed no

objections to the report and recommendation.

This court having reviewed the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, it

is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 18) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are denied and the case is

DISMISSED with prejudice."

4. A certificate of appealability is denied.

Case 3:11-cv-00002-WS-MD Document 20 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of October , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:11cv2-WS

Case 3:11-cv-00002-WS-MD Document 20 Filed 10/11/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF

HIGHER EDUCATION,

Respondent

v.

ASSOCIATION OF PENNSYLVANIA

STATE COLLEGE & UNIVERSITY

FACULTIES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 70 MM 2023

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23 rd day of October , 2023, the Petition for Review is DENIED.
# C_2011020EN.01000801.xml

| 21.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6067 — PAI/Swissport)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 20/03

On 14 January 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6067. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6067. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011156EN.01000201.xml

| 26.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 May 2011

2011/C 156/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4069 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4569 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86720 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9150 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2324 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8240 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,577 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,06 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9678 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1345 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2603 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3399 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3768 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9474 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7672 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7557 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 550,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9299 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1357 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4450 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 091,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3086 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,268 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0100 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,840 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2940 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4861 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,7750 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4069

JPY

Japanese yen

115,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4569

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86720

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9150

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2324

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8240

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,577

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,06

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9678

RON

Romanian leu

4,1345

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2603

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3399

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3768

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9474

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7672

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7557

KRW

South Korean won

1 550,35

ZAR

South African rand

9,9299

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1357

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4450

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 091,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3086

PHP

Philippine peso

61,268

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0100

THB

Thai baht

42,840

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2940

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4861

INR

Indian rupee

63,7750

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 01/10/11 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JOSEPH A. BEATTY,

an individual,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cv145-SPM/GRJ

WINDHAM PROFESSIONALS, INC.,

a Massachusetts corporation,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This cause comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Notice of

Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice (doc. 22). In accordance with Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) this case is dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED this 19th day of January, 2011.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ANTHONY MARKIECE JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:11cv105/MCR/EMT

WALTER A. McNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (doc. 1). Plaintiff subsequently filed

amended complaints (see docs. 12, 19). On January 6, 2012, Plaintiff was given thirty (30) days

in which to file a Third Amended Complaint (see doc. 22). Plaintiff failed to respond to the order;

therefore, on February 9, 2012, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within

twenty-one (21) days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order

of the court (doc. 26). The time for compliance with the show cause order has now elapsed, and

Plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 9th day of March 2012.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00105-MCR-EMT Document 27 Filed 03/09/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:11cv105/MCR/EMT

Case 3:11-cv-00105-MCR-EMT Document 27 Filed 03/09/12 Page 2 of 2