alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TRANSCRYPT
INTERNATIONAL, INC'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,262
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,997
<INVENTORY>                                     13,907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,986
<PP&E>                                          18,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,212
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           129
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,212
<SALES>                                         62,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,041
<CGS>                                           44,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,047<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (655)<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (26,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,916)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,294)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.72)
<FN>
<F1>OTHER EXPENSES INCLUDES A $1.2 MILLION RESTRUCTURING CHARGE AND A $10.0 MILLION
SPECIAL PROVISION FOR THE POTENTIAL SETTLEMENT OF THE PENDING CLASS ACTION
LAWSUITS.
<F2>INTEREST EXPENSE IS NET OF $1,304 OF INTEREST INCOME LESS $649 OF INTEREST
EXPENSE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel Johannes Pretorius, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Daniel Johannes Pretorius By:


Exhibit 13.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Craig Clinton Barnes, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Craig Clinton Barnes By:    
  Craig
#### McRORIE v. QUERY

No. 81 PC.

Case below : 32 N.C. App. 311.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 May 1977.
# C_2009305EN.01000602.xml

| 16.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5713 — Altor/Pharmacy Company Sweden 1 AB and Pharmacy Company Sweden 8)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 305/04

On 11 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5713. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5713. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STUART W. RYAN,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv336/RS-CJK

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 

UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are Defendant’s Amended Motion For An Award Of Attorney’s Fees

(Doc. 114) and Plaintiff’s response (Doc. 115). Defendant shall file a reply to Plaintiff’s

Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Defendant’s Motion For An Award Of Attorney’s

Fees (Doc. 115) not later than August 25, 2011.

ORDERED on August 12, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00336-RS-CJK Document 116 Filed 08/12/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

EDWARD L. THOMPSON, SR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:09cv384/LAC/EMT

JANET KEELS

Coordinator of the Office

of Executive Clemency,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated April 13, 2010 (Doc. 25). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections

filed, if any.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) filed byDefendant Janet Keels

(Doc. 22) is GRANTED.

3. This action is DISMISSED and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26 day of April, 2010. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
!y F{y Y1'Y ': l ELKC;':*'.:: ~:c;,L., 1 *-& !; C'NITEU STATES DIS'I'RICT COIJRT ? i ! ! DOC 2: ;r S(lU'l'1 IERN DISTRICT Ol NEW YORK i _.__._l.r_ _ E, i \\;~gr~;~-{i,i:,-;:): --- 5:3&-cR ..," 7; I. - t 

:,__ .--" .--.- ---. .u.-,rrF---"-' .,'+--., .-. .I <.- ' 

IK RE: 

j MAS-I'EK FlLE 

FOSAhl,AX PRODTJCTS LI;\131LI'l'Y I I I'IG.4TION 

I 1 106-MD- 1789 (Jl'K) 

l'hir. Ur)c./,nrr.n~ Kt~/tr!c.s Tu All Acriotw 

OKI)EK FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC \'1C E 

Considcring thc Ccrtiticate oS Good Sta~ldi~~g and all nthcr documents required by Case 

Managenlent Order No. 3 submitted by counsel. IT IS HFREI31' 0RT)ERE':T) that: 

Applicant's Name: S. Lccnan C';irter 

Firm Name: iVnllcr. Lansden. Dortch & Davis, I .I .P 

Address: 51 1 1 Inion Streil.l. Suite 2700 

is adulirtcd to practice pro hac \.ice as cou~lsel for hlcrck & Co., lnc, in the above captionrd case 

\ in the United States District Court for the Suulhel.n Ilistrict of Ncw Ynrk. 

A 

'" Jlaled: ~a~'.. 7008 

New Yorli. Kt.\v I'rlrh 

. . . . . . .- . LfA, - . 

llnitcd Status Ilist rid Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03465-JFK Document 32 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 1 of 2
CEItTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING 

; ss, 

.\.lIUULE DISTRICT OF TENNKSSI'II 

1. KEI'I'H 'I'HIIOClihlOII'I'I~.U. Clerk ui' the L'nilcd Slates Ilistrict C:ourt for the Middle 

1)istr.icl of'l'cnncsscc. 

110 I Il-,KIX3Y C'ER'I I1 Y I hat S. KEENAN CARTER lvas duly ndmittcd li! jlrdct~cc in said 

('our1 on ,lutlc 2Sih, 2004, :ind IS in good standing as a rneu~bcr 01' ~hu b;~r 01-said Courr. 

Case 1:07-cv-03465-JFK Document 32 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 28, 2014

p0224 

# Order

Clerk February 28, 2014

147935

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGA N,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147935

COA: 314422

Saginaw CC: 11

- 035348

- FH

DANIEL MARIN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 8, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2010015EN.01000301.xml

| 21.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/3

---

Special Report No 15/2009 ‘EU assistance implemented through United Nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring’

2010/C 15/03

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 15/2009 ‘EU assistance implemented through United Nations organisations: decision-making and monitoring’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FRANKLIN ZORILLA,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv392-RH/WCS

ATTORNEY GENERAL, etc.,

Respondent.

____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 4. No objections have been filed. As set out in the

report and recommendation, dismissal is appropriate for failing to comply with a

court order. It also appears that jurisdiction over the petitioner’s substantive claims

would lie only in the Court of Appeals. For these reasons,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED. The clerk must enter

judgment stating, “This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.” The clerk must

close the file. 

SO ORDERED on December 3, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 4, 2011

p0201 

# Order

February 4, 2011

141882 & (119)(121)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee,

v SC: 141882 COA: 283161 Wayne CC: 07-012443-FC ADRIAN MAHDEE AKRAM, Defendant-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the August 31, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cr oss-appellant are considered, and they are DENIED, because we are not pe rsuaded that the questions pr esented should be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY , J., I recuse myself from this ma tter pursuant to MC R 2.003(C)(1)(a). I have previously expressed st atements on the record as a Ci rcuit Court Judge that could demonstrate personal bias ag ainst defense trial counsel.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2239 

To codify an Executive order preparing the United States for the impacts 

of climate change, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To codify an Executive order preparing the United States 

for the impacts of climate change, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENACTMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The provisions of Executive Order 

5 13653 (78 Fed. Reg. 66819; relating to preparing the 

6 United States for the impacts of climate change (Novem7 ber 1, 2013)) (as in effect on March 27, 2017) are enacted 

8 into law. 

9 (b) PUBLICATION.—In publishing this Act in slip 

10 form and in the United States Statutes at Large pursuant 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2239 IS

1 to section 112 of title 1, United States Code, the Archivist 

2 of the United States shall include after the date of ap3 proval at the end an appendix setting forth the text of 

4 the Executive order referred to in subsection (a) (as in 

5 effect on March 27, 2017). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60922

Summary Calendar

 

JUAN DE LA CRUZ-PUENTE,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A74 637 371

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Juan de la Cruz-Puente (de la Cruz), represented by counsel,

petitions this court for review of a final order of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge’s

decision denying his application for cancellation of a removal

order entered against him. De la Cruz has failed to provide

citations to legal authorities in support of his allegations or to

identify adequately any errors committed by the immigration judge

or the BIA and has raised different issues in the argument and
2

summary of argument sections of his brief. See FED. R. APP.

P. 28(a)(9); 5TH CIR. R. 28.3(j); Brinkmann v. Dallas Cty. Deputy

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987).

Accordingly, de la Cruz’s petition is DENIED for failure to

brief his issues. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th

Cir. 2003). 

PETITION DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 239 (Thursday, December 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 70890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6041]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CO-140-08-1610-DP]


Notice of Public Meeting, Northwest Colorado Resource Advisory 
Council Subcommittees for the Glenwood Springs Resource Management Plan 
Revision

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, DOI.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Northwest 
Colorado Resource Advisory Council (RAC) Subcommittee on the Glenwood 
Springs Resource Management Plan (RMP) Revision will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: January 16 and 30, February 6 and 20, 2008; from 5 p.m. to 7:30 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The Glenwood Springs Subcommittee will meet at the Glenwood 
Springs Energy Office Conference Room, 2425 S. Grand Ave, Glenwood 
Springs, CO.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Hopkins, Planning and 
Environmental Coordinator, 50629 Hwy. 6&24, Glenwood Springs, CO, 
telephone 970-947-2840.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Northwest Colorado RAC advises the 
Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a 
variety of public land issues in northwestern Colorado. A sub-committee 
has been formed under this RAC to advise it regarding the Glenwood 
Springs RMP Revisions. The 14 individuals on this subcommittee 
represent a broad range of interests and have specific knowledge of the 
subcommittee represent a broad range of interests and have specific 
knowledge of the Field Offices. Recommendations developed by these 
subcommittees will be presented formally for discussion to the NW RAC 
at publicly announced meetings of the full NW RAC. Both the 
subcommittee meetings and the full NW RAC meetings have public comment 
opportunities.

    Dated: December 6, 2007.
Jamie Connell,
Glenwood Springs Field Manager, Lead Designated Federal Officer for the 
Northwest Colorado RAC.
[FR Doc. 07-6041 Filed 12-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
# C_2010055EN.01000601.xml

| 5.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 March 2010

2010/C 55/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3668 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4423 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90500 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7430 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4632 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0505 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,818 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,02 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9010 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0885 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1120 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5149 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4071 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6105 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9826 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9109 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 565,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,1925 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3303 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2653 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 667,29 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6075 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,002 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,7000 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,606 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4435 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3595 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,6200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3668

JPY

Japanese yen

120,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4423

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90500

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7430

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4632

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0505

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,818

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,02

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9010

RON

Romanian leu

4,0885

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1120

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5149

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4071

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6105

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9826

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9109

KRW

South Korean won

1 565,19

ZAR

South African rand

10,1925

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3303

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2653

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 667,29

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6075

PHP

Philippine peso

63,002

RUB

Russian rouble

40,7000

THB

Thai baht

44,606

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4435

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3595

INR

Indian rupee

62,6200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-170-SPM-WCS

MARLENE DEKKER,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 14). The Parties have been furnished copies and have

been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the

Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 14) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 8) is granted.

3. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $254,215.29,

representing interest of $91,030.98, and principle on the two 
promissory notes of $163,184.31.

DONE AND ORDERED this twentieth day of April, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
# C_2009261EN.01002201.xml

| 31.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/22

---

EPSO/AD/174/09 — Polish-language conference interpreters (AD 5 and AD 7)

2009/C 261/10

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is publishing an amendment to the following notice of open competition:

| — | EPSO/AD/174/09 to recruit Polish-language conference interpreters (AD 5/AD 7) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/174/09 to recruit Polish-language conference interpreters (AD 5/AD 7)

The amendment is published in Official Journal C 261 A of 31 October 2009 in Polish only.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000080207-MAY-201309:52 AM
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES AND AFFILIATES OF EEX CORPORATION:

EEX Operating LLC
EEX Operating L.P.
EEX Capital, Inc.
Enserch Offshore, Inc.
Enserch International Oil & Gas, Inc.
EEX International, Inc.
DALEN Resources California Co.
Corpus Christi Energy Co.
Corpus Christi Hydrocarbons Co.
Enserch (UK) Oil & Gas Limited
Enserch Far East Ltd.
Enserch India, Inc.
Enserch Malaysia Ltd.
Enserch Middle East Ltd.
EEX Asahan Ltd.
Enserch International Exploration Ltd.
EEX Turkey B.V.