alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2390 

To prohibit the imposition of the death penalty for any violation of Federal 

law, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2019 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. BOOKER, Ms. HARRIS, Ms. 

HIRONO, Mr. KAINE, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. SANDERS, and Mr. SCHATZ) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the imposition of the death penalty for any 

violation of Federal law, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON IMPOSITION OF DEATH SEN4 TENCE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, no person may be sentenced to death or put 

7 to death on or after the date of enactment of this Act 

8 for any violation of Federal law. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2390 IS

1 (b) PERSONS SENTENCED BEFORE DATE OF EN2 ACTMENT.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 

3 any person sentenced to death before the date of enact4 ment of this Act for any violation of Federal law shall 

5 be resentenced. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SEAN REILLY,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:10cv313–WS/CAS

JENNIFER DAVIS,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc.

16) docketed August 15, 2018. The magistrate judge recommends that Plaintiff’s

Motion to Correct Judgment (doc. 14) be denied. Plaintiff has filed objections (doc.

17) to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed the record and—like the magistrate judge—finds 

that Plaintiff has failed to establish that he is entitled to relief under Rule 60(b). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 16) is
Page 2 of 2

ADOPTED and incorporated into this order by reference.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Correct Judgment (doc. 14) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of September , 2018.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5315 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to promulgate regulations to prohibit the storage of live animals in overhead 

compartments of airplanes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2018 

Mr. DONOVAN (for himself and Mr. COHEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to promulgate regulations to prohibit the storage 

of live animals in overhead compartments of airplanes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Planes Ensuring Total 

5 Safety Act’’ or the ‘‘PETS Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROTECTION OF PETS ON AIRPLANES. 

7 Not later than 1 year from the date of enactment 

8 of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Ad9 ministration shall promulgate regulations that— 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5315 IH

1 (1) prohibit the storing of a live animal in any 

2 overhead compartment of any flight in air transpor3 tation (as defined in section 40102(a)(5) of title 49, 

4 United States Code); and 

5 (2) establish civil fines for violations of the pro6 hibition under paragraph (1). 

Æ 


amozie on DSK30RV082PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

TERRANCE L MCCLOUD,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00461-MP -WCS

WALTER MCNEIL,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 14, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, which recommends that plaintiff’s complaint, Doc. 1, be dismissed without

prejudice for failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has not

objected to the recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it

is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 14, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint, Doc. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00461-MP-WCS Document 15 Filed 05/09/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009045EN.01002201.xml

| 24.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/22

---

Special Report No 8/2008 ‘Is cross compliance an effective policy?’

(2009/C 45/04)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 8/2008 ‘Is cross compliance an effective policy?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| L-1615 Luxembourg |
| Tel. (352) 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

L-1615 Luxembourg

Tel. (352) 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

EVANS LEE WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00185-MP -GRJ

ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Plaintiff has filed a Response to the Court’s previous order regarding his

complaint and filing fees. (Doc. 4). He has been transferred to the Reception and

Medical Center and did not receive the Court’s subsequent Order (doc. 6) granting him

through October 6, 2010, to comply. This Order, mailed to Plaintiff at his previous

address in Gainesville, Florida, was returned as undeliverable. (Doc. 8). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Clerk shall note on the docket that according to the Department of

Corrections Offender Search database Plaintiff is now in Reception Medical Center, P.

O. Box 628, Lake Butler, Florida 32054. 

2. The Clerk shall mail to Plaintiff a copy of the complaint, (Doc. 1) and copies of

Documents 4 and 6 with a copy of this order.
Page 2 of 2

3. Plaintiff shall have through October 17, 2010, to comply with the instructions

in the Order dated September 14, 2010.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2010. 

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00185-MP -GRJ
# C_2009220EN.01000101.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/1

---

2009/C 220/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 205, 29.8.2009

OJ C 205, 29.8.2009

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 193, 15.8.2009

OJ C 180, 1.8.2009

OJ C 167, 18.7.2009

OJ C 153, 4.7.2009

OJ C 141, 20.6.2009

OJ C 129, 6.6.2009

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SHERMAN M KLAUSNER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00214-MP -GRJ

NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS INC,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 19, the plaintiff’s notice that he has accepted the

defendant’s Offer of Judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 68. Pursuant to that rule, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against

defendant for $1,001.00.

2. Under the terms of the Offer of Judgment, the plaintiff is entitled to reasonable

attorney’s fees up to April 8, 2011, the date of serving the Offer of Judgment. 

With regard to the amount of fees, the parties are directed to follow the

procedures in N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 54.1, including the responsibility from Loc. R.

54.1(C) to first confer and make good faith efforts to settle both liability for, and

amount of, attorneys' fees.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of April, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00214-MP-GRJ Document 20 Filed 04/22/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HENDRICKS & LEWIS, PLLC,

A Washington Professional

Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10mc55-SPM/WCS

GEORGE CLINTON,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated August 9, 2011 (doc. 41). The parties have been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the

report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as

follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 41) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The clerk shall enter final judgment in garnishment in Plaintiff’s

Case 4:10-mc-00055-SPM-CAS Document 42 Filed 10/12/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

favor against Garnishee, Farmers & Merchants Bank, in the amount of

$107,196.00 (account xxxxx401) and $1,278.17 (account xxxxx901).

3. The Amended Application for Issuance of Writ of Execution (doc.

33) is granted. The writ will issue separately.

4. This case is remanded to the magistrate judge for any further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:10mc55-SPM/WCS

Case 4:10-mc-00055-SPM-CAS Document 42 Filed 10/12/11 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:10-cr-00084-LC Document 2 Filed 10/26/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION of  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of EF Johnson Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jana Ahlfinger Bell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ JANA AHLFINGER BELL Jana Ahlfinger Bell Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 31, 2010


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 10.1

    SECOND AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT AGREEMENT WITH JAMES B. NELSON

<PAGE>

                                SECOND AMENDMENT

                                       TO

                        RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT AGREEMENT


         This  Second   Amendment  to  Restricted  Stock  Grant  Agreement  (the
"Amendment") is made as of this 26th day of August 2014 by and between  Solar3D,
Inc., a Delaware corporation  ("Solar3D"),  and James B. Nelson ("Grantee") with
respect to the following facts:

                                    RECITALS

         A.       Solar3D and Grantee have entered into that certain  Restricted
                  Stock Grant  Agreement,  dated as of September  23,  2013,  as
                  amended on May 1, 2014 (collectively, the "Agreement").

         B.       Solar3D and  Grantee  believe it is in the best  interests  of
                  both  Solar3D and Grantee to amend the timing for  issuance of
                  vested Shares under the Agreement.

         C.       The  terms  used in this  Amendment  will  have  the  meanings
                  ascribed to them in the  Agreement  unless  otherwise  defined
                  herein.

         NOW,   THEREFORE,   for  one  dollar   and  other  good  and   valuable
consideration, THE PARTIES HERETO AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

         1.       AMENDMENT.
                  ---------

                  The last  sentence of Section 2.2 of the  Agreement  is hereby
amended and restated as follows:  "The monthly vested  Shares,  if any, shall be
issued to the Grantee  within five (5) business  days after the last day of each
month."

         2.       EFFECT OF AMENDMENT.
                  -------------------

         The  Agreement   will  remain  in  full  force  and  effect  except  as
specifically  modified by this Amendment.  In the event of any conflict  between
the Amendment and the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment will govern.

         3.       COUNTERPARTS.
                  ------------

         This  Amendment  may  be  executed  simultaneously  in  any  number  of
counterparts,  each of which  counterparts  will be deemed to be an original and
such counterparts will constitute but one and the same instrument.

                                      -1-
<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  Amendment  is executed as of the date first
above written.

SOLAR3D:                            SOLAR3D, INC.


                                    By:/s/ Emil Beitpolous
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                        Emil Beitpolous, Director


                                    By:/s/ Mark J. Richardson
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                        Mark J. Richardson, Director




GRANTEE:                               /s/ James B. Nelson
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       James B. Nelson





















                                      -2-
# C_2010064EN.01000901.xml

| 16.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/9

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/177/10

2010/C 64/06

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition EPSO/AD/177/10 — ADMINISTRATORS (AD 5) in the following fields:

| 1. | European Public Administration |
| --- | --- |

1.

European Public Administration

| 2. | Law |
| --- | --- |

2.

Law

| 3. | Economics |
| --- | --- |

3.

Economics

| 4. | Audit |
| --- | --- |

4.

Audit

| 5. | Information And Communication Technology (ICT) |
| --- | --- |

5.

Information And Communication Technology (ICT)

The competition notice is published in Official Journal C 64 A of 16 March 2010.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website http://eu-careers.eu

---
# C_2011037EN.01000701.xml

| 5.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 February 2011

2011/C 37/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3631 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,42 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4544 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84720 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8185 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2954 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8075 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,018 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,35 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7015 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9008 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2640 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1736 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3406 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3448 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6124 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7685 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7362 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 505,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9353 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,9760 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4220 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 210,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1302 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,575 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0029 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,997 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2718 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3538 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,1540 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3631

JPY

Japanese yen

111,42

DKK

Danish krone

7,4544

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84720

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8185

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2954

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8075

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,018

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,35

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7015

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9008

RON

Romanian leu

4,2640

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1736

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3406

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3448

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6124

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7685

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7362

KRW

South Korean won

1 505,75

ZAR

South African rand

9,9353

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,9760

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4220

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 210,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1302

PHP

Philippine peso

59,575

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0029

THB

Thai baht

41,997

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2718

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3538

INR

Indian rupee

62,1540

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### STATE v. WATTS

No. 120 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 753.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1977.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2489 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2489

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for 
   financial assistance for supportive services for very low-income 
     veteran families in permanent housing, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2019

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for 
   financial assistance for supportive services for very low-income 
     veteran families in permanent housing, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping Our Commitment to Ending 
Veteran Homelessness Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR SUPPORTIVE 
              SERVICES FOR VERY LOW-INCOME VETERAN FAMILIES IN 
              PERMANENT HOUSING.

    Section 2044(e)(1)(G) of title 38, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ``fiscal year 2019'' and inserting ``each of fiscal years 
2019 through 2021''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOE RENA DELGADO,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-238-RH-GRJ

WALTER MCNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On March 9, 2011, the Court entered an order granting Plaintiff until April 11,

2011 to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 16.) In that order, the Court specifically

explained to Plaintiff that failure to comply with that order would result in a

recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Court

previously had granted Plaintiff two other extensions of time to file an amended

complaint. (Docs. 9 & 13.) As of the date of this report and recommendation, Plaintiff

has not filed an amended complaint or filed any other document since a March 7, 2011

letter motion requesting an extension of the time within which to file an amended

complaint. (Doc. 15.) More than two months have passed and Plaintiff has not taken

any action to advance this case.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed for

failure to comply with an order of the Court and for failure to prosecute. 

IN CHAMBERS, at Gainesville, Florida, this 14 day of June 2011.

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00238-RH-GRJ Document 17 Filed 06/14/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No: 5:10-cv-238-RH-GRJ

Case 5:10-cv-00238-RH-GRJ Document 17 Filed 06/14/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2010150EN.01000301.xml

| 9.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 June 2010

2010/C 150/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1942 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 109,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4382 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82805 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6597 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3793 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9820 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,920 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7075 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1330 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2165 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9140 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4579 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2576 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3202 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8039 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6912 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 473,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2825 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1558 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2450 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 119,40 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9737 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,725 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,0070 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,952 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2272 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,4171 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 56,0650 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1942

JPY

Japanese yen

109,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4382

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82805

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6597

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3793

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9820

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,920

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7075

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1330

RON

Romanian leu

4,2165

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9140

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4579

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2576

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3202

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8039

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6912

KRW

South Korean won

1 473,15

ZAR

South African rand

9,2825

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1558

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2450

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 119,40

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9737

PHP

Philippine peso

55,725

RUB

Russian rouble

38,0070

THB

Thai baht

38,952

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2272

MXN

Mexican peso

15,4171

INR

Indian rupee

56,0650

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---