alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 23, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 59939]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-55519]



========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each 
week.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 23, 2007 / 
Rules and Regulations

[[Page 59939]]



DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 23


Airworthiness Standards: Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter 
Category Airplanes

CFR Correction

    In Title 14, of the Code of Federal Regulations, revised as of 
January 1, 2007, on page 227, in Sec.  23.561, paragraph (d)(1), remove 
the second entry for pargraphs (i) through (iv), and remove (d)(1)(v).

[FR Doc. 07-55519 Filed 10-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
EXHIBIT 14



CANALASKA URANIUM LTD.

(the Company)



Request for Financial Statements



National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligationsrequires the Company send annually a request form to registered holders and beneficial owners of securities to enable the holders and owners to request a copy of the Companys annual financial statements and related MD&A and/or interim financial statements and related MD&A, in accordance with the procedures set out in National Instrument 54-101 Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer.  If you wish to receive either or both of the financial statements, you must complete this form and return it to our offices.





COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS FORM TO:



CANALASKA URANIUM LTD.

2303 West 41st Avenue

Vancouver, BC  V6M 2A3

Facsimile:  604-685-6550





________  I wish to receive Annual Financial Statements and related MD&A



________  I wish to receive Interim Financial Statements and related MD&A



________  I wish to receive both Annual Financial Statements and related MD&As





NAME:

TELEPHONE:





ADDRESS:

FACSIMILE:





EMAIL:



Please note that a request form will be mailed each year.  If you wish to receive such materials, a request form must be returned to the Company each year to receive the Annual and Interim Financial Statements and related MD&As.



I confirm that I am a registered / beneficial shareholder of the Company





SIGNATURE OF SHAREHOLDER:





DATE:





CUSIP NO:  13708P102
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WINNIE THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-318/RS-EMT

CINCINNATI INS. CO.,

a foreign corporation, 

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested in the Joint Motion Requesting Permission to File Reply 

Briefs (Doc. 84) is GRANTED. The parties shall have until not later than April 6, 2011 

to file their briefs. 

ORDERED on March 31, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 9, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2454 Lower Tribunal No. 18-32743

________________ 

### Arlette Breto , Appellant,
vs. 

### Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Company , Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Alan Fine, Judge. Chad Barr Law, and Chad A. Barr (Altamonte Springs), for appellant. Bernstein, Chackman, Liss, and Steven J. Chackman (Hollywood); Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., and Paulo R. Lima and Elizabeth K. Russo, for appellee. Before LOGUE, C.J., and LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6164

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

VAGAS DAVIS, a/k/a Vegas Gabriel Davis,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:10-cr-00309-HEH-1; 3:13-cv-00617-HEH)

Submitted: June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vagas Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Vagas Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying 

his motion for reconsideration, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Davis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CATHY BAILEY, 

WALLACE BAILEY,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv515-RH/WCS 

STATE OF FLORIDA et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 15. No objections have been filed. Upon 

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is DISMISSED 

for failure to prosecute.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on October 13, 2011.

Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00515-RH-WCS Document 16 Filed 10/13/11 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [CO-140-08-1610-DP]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, DOI.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Northwest Colorado Resource Advisory Council (RAC) Subcommittee on the Glenwood Springs Resource Management Plan (RMP) Revision will meet as indicated below.

# DATES:

January 16 and 30, February 6 and 20, 2008; from 5 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The Glenwood Springs Subcommittee will meet at the Glenwood Springs Energy Office Conference Room, 2425 S. Grand Ave, Glenwood Springs, CO.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brian Hopkins, Planning and Environmental Coordinator, 50629 Hwy. 6&24, Glenwood Springs, CO, telephone 970-947-2840.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Northwest Colorado RAC advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of public land issues in northwestern Colorado. A sub-committee has been formed under this RAC to advise it regarding the Glenwood Springs RMP Revisions. The 14 individuals on this subcommittee represent a broad range of interests and have specific knowledge of the subcommittee represent a broad range of interests and have specific knowledge of the Field Offices. Recommendations developed by these subcommittees will be presented formally for discussion to the NW RAC at publicly announced meetings of the full NW RAC. Both the subcommittee meetings and the full NW RAC meetings have public comment opportunities.

Dated: December 6, 2007.

Jamie Connell,

Glenwood Springs Field Manager, Lead Designated Federal Officer for the Northwest Colorado RAC.

[FR Doc. 07-6041 Filed 12-12-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual Report of XTL Biopharmaceuticals
Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, David Grossman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Ronen Twito, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





| | /s/ David Grossman     
| | -----------------------
| | David Grossman         
| | Chief Executive Officer
| |                        
| | /s/ Ronen Twito        
| | Ronen Twito            
| | Chief Financial Officer



Date: March 29, 2012
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

KATHERYN PORTER,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:10-CV-36-SPM/AK

TEMPLE HILL INC, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO NAME ADDITIONAL PLAINTIFFS

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of

Time to Name Additional Plaintiffs (doc. 26). As grounds, Plaintiff states that additional

time is necessary to conduct discovery in order to identify potential plaintiffs, who will be

timely notified of the opportunity to join this lawsuit. As the Court finds that the

Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time is reasonable, it is hereby ORDERED AND

ADJUDGED that the Motion (doc. 26) is GRANTED.

DONE AND ORDERED this thirteenth day of September, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Randall Reneau, the Chief Executive Officer of Strategic American Oil Corporation, and Johnathan Lindsay, the Chief Financial Officer of Strategic American Oil Corporation, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Strategic American Oil Corporation, for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Strategic American Oil Corporation.



Date:     March 18, 2009.





|/s/ "Randall Reneau"                    
|----------------------------------------
|Randall ReneauChief Executive Officer   
|/s/ "Johnathan Lindsay"                 
|Johnathan LindsayChief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Strategic American Oil Corporation and will be retained by Strategic American Oil Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011186EN.01000101.xml

| 25.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/1

---

2011/C 186/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 179, 18.6.2011

OJ C 179, 18.6.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 173, 11.6.2011

OJ C 160, 28.5.2011

OJ C 152, 21.5.2011

OJ C 145, 14.5.2011

OJ C 139, 7.5.2011

OJ C 130, 30.4.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2011014EN.01000702.xml

| 18.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6037 — DNATA/Alpha Flight Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 14/04

On 17 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6037. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6037. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Poker Magic, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas Polinsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph A. Geraci, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May 13, 2011
/s/ Douglas PolinskyDouglas PolinskyChief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2011
/s/ Joseph A. Geraci, IIJoseph A. Geraci, IIChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7691

JAMES CALVIN ROTHWELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CARROLL A. CAMPBELL, Governor, State of South

Carolina; PARKER EVATT, Commissioner, South

Carolina Department of Corrections; GENE

BAKER; TONY ELLIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Chief District

Judge. (CA-93-2194-2-2AJ)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 25, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Calvin Rothwell, Appellant Pro Se. John Gregg McMaster, Jr.,

TOMPKINS & MCMASTER, Columbia, South Carolina; Robert Eric Petersen, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rothwell v.

Campbell, No. CA-93-2194-2-2AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 1995). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

T.M.W.,

Respondent

v.

N.J.W.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 241 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of September, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-220/RS-EMT 

MARION KING, as President

of Chipley Drugs, Inc.,

Respondent. 

_________________________________________ 

UORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 12). This case is dismissed 

without prejudice. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on October 20, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANTHONY JOSEPH LETIZIA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00039-MP -WCS

RYAN BERRY, CLAUDE CAMPBELL, DAVID GARCIA, GLENN GILBERT, MARC

MICALE, ROBERT OLESON, OSCEOLA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 4, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, which recommends transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, for all further proceedings. No party has objected

and the time for doing so has passed.

All of the Defendants are employed with the Osceola County Sheriff's Office in

Kissimmee, Florida. Doc. 1 at 2. The events at issue took place in Osceola County where

Plaintiff alleges unlawful, excessive force was used against him during an "undercover reverse

sting operation.” Id. Because Osceola County is located in the Middle District of Florida, as are

each of the Defendants, the proper forum for this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28

U.S.C. § 89(b) is in the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division. Finding no plain error, it is

accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 4, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein. 
Page 2 of 2

2. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida, Orlando Division.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of March, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 4:11-cv-00039-MP -WCS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

KIM BERRYMAN-DAGES, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00177-MP-GRJ

CITY OF GAINESVILLE FLORIDA, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on doc. 92, Motion to Extend the Deadline for

Filing Motions for Summary Judgment by City of Gainesville Florida. The defendant

requests that the deadline for filing motions for summary judgment be extended one

week, until December 15, 2011. Plaintiff has no objection to the requested extension.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The defendant’s motion to extend the deadline for filing motions for

summary judgment, doc. 92, is GRANTED.

2. Motions for summary judgment may be filed on or before December 15,

2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9 day of December, 2011. th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00177-MP-GRJ Document 93 Filed 12/09/11 Page 1 of 1