alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report
of Spartan Gold Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John S. Wittler, President and Interim
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 , fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report for the period ending June 30, 2012 , fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spartan Gold Ltd.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: August 14, 2012                                                                | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|                                                                                     | 
|/s/ John S. Wittler                                                                  | 
|John S. Wittler
        Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel Review PAR 05-031, P01s.                    

*Date:*                         November 28-29, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Doubletree Hotel Bethesda, (Formerly Holiday Inn Select), 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Peter Zelazowski, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Inst. of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-6402, 301-593-4861,                         *peter.zelazowski@nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 1, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5615  Filed 11-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KAYLE WALKER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 5:10cv290/RS/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This action was initiated under the Social Security Act to obtain judicial review of

Defendant’s final decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits (Doc. 1). Now before the

court is Defendant’s Motion to Remand pursuant to sentence four of Title 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc.

26). Defendant has certified that Plaintiff has no objection to this motion (id.).

Sentence four of section 405(g) states that “[t]he court shall have power to enter, upon the

pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision

of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” 42

U.S.C. § 405(g). In the instant case, the Commissioner states that remand is appropriate to enable

an Administrative Law Judge to: 

make the treatment notes of K.W. Howard, M.D., received on January 12, 2010, part

of the administrative record. The ALJ will also be instructed to properly evaluate Dr.

Howard’s treatment notes in assessing Plaintiff’s claims.

(Doc. 26, Memorandum in Support at 1). Based upon the foregoing, this court concludes that good

cause has been shown for remand.

Case 5:10-cv-00290-RS-EMT Document 27 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That Defendant’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 26) be GRANTED, and the

Commissioner’s decision denying benefits be REVERSED.

2. That this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. That Defendant be ordered to conduct proceedings in accordance with this Report

and Recommendation.

4. That the clerk be directed to enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure

5. That the clerk be directed to administratively close this file. 

At Pensacola, Florida, this 30th day of September 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

 ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A copy of

objections shall be served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object

may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States

v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No.: 5:10cv290/RS/EMT

Case 5:10-cv-00290-RS-EMT Document 27 Filed 09/30/11 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:10-cv-00439-RH -WCS Document 1 Filed 10/12/10 Page 1 of 4
Case 4:10-cv-00439-RH -WCS Document 1 Filed 10/12/10 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:10-cv-00439-RH -WCS Document 1 Filed 10/12/10 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:10-cv-00439-RH -WCS Document 1 Filed 10/12/10 Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ELVIS PRESLEY ENTERPRISES INC,

et al.,

VS CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00050-RH-WCS

BUD GLASS PRODUCTIONS, et al.,

JUDGMENT

The parties are ordered to comply with the consent order. The court reserves

jurisdiction to enforce the consent order. All claims in this case are dismissed with

prejudice.

 July 12, 2011

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

s/ Kayla Bruner

DATE Deputy Clerk: Kayla Bruner

Case 4:11-cv-00050-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION of

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with
the Annual Report of EFJ, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael E. Jalbert, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | /S/ Michael E. Jalbert 
|                     |  | Michael E. Jalbert     
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     | 
|Date: March 13, 2008 |  |                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 8.1 LIST OF
SUBSIDIARIES  SUBSIDIARY NAME
  
  JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATIONBlyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Ltd
  
  South AfricaBuffelsfontein Gold Mines Ltd
  
  South AfricaWest Witwatersrand Gold Mines Ltd
  
  South AfricaCrown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Ltd
  
  South AfricaDome Resources (Pty) Ltd
  
  AustraliaDRD (Isle of Man) Limited
  
  Isle of ManTolukuma Gold Mines Ltd
  
  Papua New GuineaOrogen Minerals (Porgera) Limited
  
  Papua New Guinea
# C_2010288EN.01000502.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/5

---

Designation of the Judge replacing the President as the Judge hearing applications for interim measures

(2010/C 288/09)

On 20 September 2010, the General Court decided, in accordance with Article 106 of the Rules of Procedure, to designate Judge Prek to replace the President of the General Court for the purpose of deciding applications for interim measures where the latter is absent or prevented from dealing with them, for the period from 20 September 2010 to 31 August 2011.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 121

### CFR Correction

In Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 60 to 139, revised as of January 1, 2007, in Appendix I to Part 121, on page 938, section VI is corrected by removing and reserving paragraph D.2.

[FR Doc. 07-55504 Filed 3-22-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

GERARD M. VIRGA, SR. and

his wife, DENISE VIRGA, 

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-242/RS-EMT

CSPS METAL, INC., a California

corporation, WAL-MART STORES, INC., a

Delaware corporation, CSPS METAL CO., LTD.,

a Taiwan corporation, and SAM’S EAST INC., a

wholly owned subsidiary of WAL-MART STORES, 

INC., d/b/a SAM’S CLUB, 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested in the Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline and Assign Case 

to a Complex Track Trial Schedule (Doc. 23) is DENIED. This case is not 

extraordinarily complex and the parties have known from the initial disclosures, (Doc. 6), 

that CSPS METAL, INC, had its principal place of business in Taiwan, and that there 

existed a parent company who was also likely foreign. 

For these very same reasons, the Amended Report of the Parties Planning Meeting 

(Doc. 22) is insufficient. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file a second amended 

joint report not later than November 22, 2010, with dates consistent with a discovery 

deadline of March 15, 2011, and jury trial on May 23, 2011, or June 6, 2011.
ORDERED on November 16, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Order entered July 18, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00825-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15-00638-W

ORDER

Before the Court is the District Clerk’s request for a ten-day extension in which to file the 

clerk’s record. The request is GRANTED. The clerk’s record is now due on or before July 28, 

2016. However, because this is an accelerated appeal, the District Clerk shall advise this Court 

on or before July 28, 2016, whether the record has been located. If the record has not been 

located, this Court may take whatever measures it deems necessary, including abatement, to 

determine whether the record has been lost or destroyed due to no fault of the appellant. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(e); 35.3(c).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-89,791-02

EX P ARTE P IERRE DANIELRELL THOMAS, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W08-30475-K (B) IN THE NO. 4 DIST RICT COURT

F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convic ted of manslaughte r and sente nced to twe nty

year s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends that his trial counsel re ndere d ineffe ctive assistanc e bec ause he denied Applicant the ability to appea l his conviction by err oneously advis ing A p p lic ant on the conseque nces of an a ppeal. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these2

circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of i neff ective assistance o f co u n s el. The trial court may

use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)

. I f t he trial court elects t o hold a hearing , it shall deter mine whether Applicant i s indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr es en t ed by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hearing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s trial counsel err oneously advised Applicant reg arding the conseque nces of an appea l. The trial court shall also make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether the perf ormanc e of Applicant’s trial counsel was defic ient and, if so, whether counsel’s defic ient perf ormanc e prejudice d Applicant. The trial court shall also make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether the application should be barr ed under lache s. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claim for habea s corpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues sh al l b e re s o l ved within 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcript containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court withi n 120 day s of the date of t his order

. Any extensions of ti me must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court.3

Filed: September

11, 2019 Do not publish
# C_2009035EN.01000701.xml

| 12.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 February 2009

(2009/C 35/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2938 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,5 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4518 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,9 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8175 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4972 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,69 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,575 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 295,99 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7046 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5848 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2875 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1222 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9745 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6138 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0287 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4693 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9517 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 802,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,8976 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8409 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,43 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 331,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6632 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,8 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,55 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,393 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9763 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,8571 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,956 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2938

JPY

Japanese yen

116,5

DKK

Danish krone

7,4518

GBP

Pound sterling

0,9

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8175

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4972

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,69

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

28,575

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

295,99

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7046

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5848

RON

Romanian leu

4,2875

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1222

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9745

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6138

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0287

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4693

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9517

KRW

South Korean won

1 802,65

ZAR

South African rand

12,8976

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8409

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,43

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 331,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6632

PHP

Philippine peso

60,8

RUB

Russian rouble

45,55

THB

Thai baht

45,393

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9763

MXN

Mexican peso

18,8571

INR

Indian rupee

62,956

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

vs. Case No. 3:10cr47/LAC

ANTHONY DANI FOUNTAIN

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P.,

and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts I and II of the Indictment. After cautioning and examining

the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that

the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the offenses charged are supported by an

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offenses. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have

sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: June 29, 2010 /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

twenty four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A

copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No. 3:10cr47/LAC
Exhibit 32(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





|/s/ Leo P. DenaultLeo P. Denault
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Entergy Corporation
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:	August 7, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0574

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

MALINDA CRAZYMULE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 8, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 28 2022

02/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0574