alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010072EN.01002501.xml

| 20.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/25

---

Corrigendum to the 2010 Call for proposals — Exercises, Union Civil Protection Mechanism

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 60 of 11 March 2010
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 60 of 11 March 2010

2010/C 72/11

On page 14, first paragraph of point 3:

for:

| ‘3. | Proposals must be sent to the Commission to the address indicated in the Grant Application Guide by 30 April 2010. Proposals must be submitted by post or private courier no later than 30 April 2010 (evidence shall be constituted by the date of dispatch, the postmark or the date of the deposit slip). They may also be delivered by hand to the specific address indicated in the Grant Application Guide, no later than 30 April 2010 at 17.00 (evidence shall be the acknowledgement of receipt dated and signed by the responsible official).’, |
| --- | --- |

‘3.

Proposals must be sent to the Commission to the address indicated in the Grant Application Guide by 30 April 2010. Proposals must be submitted by post or private courier no later than 30 April 2010 (evidence shall be constituted by the date of dispatch, the postmark or the date of the deposit slip). They may also be delivered by hand to the specific address indicated in the Grant Application Guide, no later than 30 April 2010 at 17.00 (evidence shall be the acknowledgement of receipt dated and signed by the responsible official).’,

read:

| ‘3. | Proposals must be sent to the Commission to the address indicated in the Grant Application Guide by 31 May 2010. Proposals must be submitted by post or private courier no later than 31 May 2010 (evidence shall be constituted by the date of dispatch, the postmark or the date of the deposit slip). They may also be delivered by hand to the specific address indicated in the Grant Application Guide, no later than 31 May 2010 at 17.00 (evidence shall be the acknowledgement of receipt dated and signed by the responsible official).’. |
| --- | --- |

‘3.

Proposals must be sent to the Commission to the address indicated in the Grant Application Guide by 31 May 2010. Proposals must be submitted by post or private courier no later than 31 May 2010 (evidence shall be constituted by the date of dispatch, the postmark or the date of the deposit slip). They may also be delivered by hand to the specific address indicated in the Grant Application Guide, no later than 31 May 2010 at 17.00 (evidence shall be the acknowledgement of receipt dated and signed by the responsible official).’.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

HOLLY B. WADE,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11cv40/RS-EMT

BORDELON MARINE, INC. and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

through the Department of Navy,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Report Of Rule 26(f) Conference (Doc. 67). The attorneys have

disregarded the guidance in the Initial Scheduling Order regarding the discovery

deadline and a trial date. 

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file an amended joint report not later than

March 25, 2011, with dates consistent with a discovery deadline of August 31, 2011,

and jury trial in Panama City on November 14, 2011, or December 12, 2011.

ORDERED on March 16, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
| 1. | Such Quarterly      Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of Global Holdings, Inc. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Global      Holdings,      Inc. |
|---------------------------------|
|                            |     |
| By:                        | /s/      Terrence      A. Tecco |
|                       | Terrence      A. Tecco |
|                            | Chief Financial      Officer and President  |
|                       |   |
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KELVIN FRAZIER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:09cv367/RV/MD

WALTER McNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

 

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated August 31, 2009. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of

the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is dismissed without prejudice so plaintiff may pursue it in

the proper forum.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2009.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
---

Exhibit 32.2 Section 1350
Certifications

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jose Luis Munoz
Aviles, the Chief Financial Officer of Chile Mining Technologies Inc. (the
Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.
The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended December
31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this statement the 22ndday of February,
2011.

| | /s/ Jose Luis Munoz Aviles
| | --------------------------
| | Jose Luis Munoz Aviles    
| | Chief Financial Officer   
| | (Principal Financial and  
| | Accounting Officer)       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Chile Mining Technologies Inc. and will be retained by
Chile Mining Technologies Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. Case No. 5:11cr3-MW/EMT

YAMURA D. HUSDON,

Defendant.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 149. Upon consideration, no objections having been filed by the 

parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s opinion. The 

Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or 

Correct Sentence By a Person in Federal Custody, ECF No. 148, is summarily DENIED and 

DISMISSED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.” The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on March 14, 2019.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

Chief United States District Judge
# C_2010352EN.01001301.xml

| 23.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/13

---

Call for proposals under the annual work programme for grants in the field of the Trans-European Energy Network (TEN-E) for 2011

(Commission Decision C(2010) 9395)

2010/C 352/12

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy, is hereby launching a call for proposals in order to award grants to projects in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the annual work programme for grants in the field of the Trans-European Energy Network for 2011.

The maximum amount available under this call for proposals, for 2011, is EUR 24 150 000.

The call is closing on 28 February 2011.

The complete text of the call for proposals is available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/infrastructure/grants/index_en.htm

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DANIEL J. LEVITAN,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv398/LAC/MD

DAVID MORGAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated January 24, 2011. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 25 day of February, 2011. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv398/LAC/MD
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

LINDA HEITZ-SHORE,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00164-MP -GRJ

CITY OF GAINESVILLE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 21, Stipulation Regarding Rule 35 Examination

and Withdrawal of Motion to Compel Rule 35 Examination, filed by the United States of

America. Previously, the government moved to compel the plaintiff to submit to a Rule 35

examination in Orlando. The Court held a hearing on May 25, 2011, after which the parties have

apparently resolved the issue without Court involvement. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Pursuant to the agreement that plaintiff will appear for an Independent Medical

Examination by Dr. German Montoya at 32 W. Gore Street, Suite 511, Orlando, Florida

at 9:30 a.m. on Friday, May 27, 2011, the motion to compel Rule 35 Examination (Doc.

18) is withdrawn. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00164-MP-GRJ Document 23 Filed 05/31/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Harold Hartley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Arrin Background, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Arrin Background, Inc.


Date: 11/12/08                        By: /s/ Harold Hartley
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Harold Hartley
                                      Title: Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted**

**pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Kathy Ordoñez,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the quarterly report of Celera Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months endedSeptember 26, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Celera Corporation. 

Date: November 9, 2009 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the datehereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to 

revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

-1-

S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

ESTATE OF LINDA HORN, by JOELYNN T. 

STOKES, Personal Representative,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

FOR PUBLICATION

October 22, 2020

v No. 349522

Oakland Circuit Court

MICHAEL J. SWOFFORD, D.O., and 

SOUTHFIELD RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, 

PLLC,

LC No. 2018-164148-NH

Defendants-Appellees.

Before: BOONSTRA, P.J., and MARKEY and HOOD, JJ.

BOONSTRA, P.J. (concurring).

I concur in the majority opinion. I write separately simply to encourage our Supreme 

Court, in this or another appropriate case, to clarify the law in this area. I note that while this case 

turns largely on the Supreme Court’s decision in Woodard v Custer, 476 Mich 545, 557; 719 

NW2d 842 (2006), by which we are bound, that decision featured no less than four opinions, 

including two concurring opinions (one of which was authored by the author of the four-Justice 

majority opinion) and a three-Justice dissent that maintained that it actually was the majority 

opinion (by virtue of the second concurrence). Moreover, this Court’s unpublished decision in 

Higgins v Traill, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued July 30, 2019 

(Docket No. 343664), featured a separate concurring opinion by Judge GLEICHER in which she 

maintained that Woodard’s analysis was faulty in certain respects and should be reconsidered. 

Although the Supreme Court subsequently denied leave to appeal in Higgins, it did so on an 

evenly-split 3-3 vote, with one Justice not participating. And there remains disagreement—which 

the Supreme Court could put to rest, one way or another—about whether its order in Estate of Jilek 

v Stockson, 490 Mich 961 (2011), implicitly overruled Reeves v Carson City Hosp (On Remand), 

274 Mich App 622; 736 NW2d 284 (2007).

For these reasons, I concur in the majority opinion, but encourage our Supreme Court to 

provide much-needed clarity in this complex area of law.

/s/ Mark T. Boonstra
# C_2011093EN.01000102.xml

| 25.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6120 — APMT/PSA/COSCO/DPPC/DPCT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 93/02

On 21 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6120. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6120. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NanoTech Entertainment, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ted D.
Campbell II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Ted D. Campbell IIName:  Ted D. Campbell IITitle:   Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:   May
      24, 2010
# C_2010322EN.01001201.xml

| 27.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 322/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 November 2010

2010/C 322/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3225 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4540 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84470 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3070 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3252 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1770 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,725 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 279,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7096 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0275 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3125 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9707 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3715 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3523 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2671 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7653 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7455 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 539,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4290 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8178 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4218 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 919,98 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1830 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,626 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,5390 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,065 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2862 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5244 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,6430 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3225

JPY

Japanese yen

110,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4540

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84470

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3070

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3252

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1770

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,725

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

279,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7096

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0275

RON

Romanian leu

4,3125

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9707

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3715

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3523

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2671

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7653

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7455

KRW

South Korean won

1 539,23

ZAR

South African rand

9,4290

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8178

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4218

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 919,98

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1830

PHP

Philippine peso

58,626

RUB

Russian rouble

41,5390

THB

Thai baht

40,065

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2862

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5244

INR

Indian rupee

60,6430

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (no. 333-168461) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (nos. 333-145079 and 333-135366) of Oilsands Quest Inc., of our report dated July 29, 2009 on the consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, comprehensive loss and cash flows for the period from inception on April 3, 1998 through to April 30, 2007 (not separately presented herein) of Oilsands Quest Inc., appearing in the annual report on Form 10-K of Oilsands Quest Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2011.
    /s/ Smythe Ratcliffe LLP
   Chartered Accountants
 Vancouver, Canada
 July 8, 2011
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SEAN PATRICK REILLY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-237-GRJ

LARRY CAMPBELL, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Doc. 22, Defendants’ motion for an extension of time

to respond to the First Amended Complaint. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED

That the motion, Doc. 22, is GRANTED. Defendants shall respond to the First

Amended Complaint on or before April 21, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8 day of April 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20904 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHNNIE EDWARD SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-264-2

- - - - - - - - - - August 15, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Johnnie Edward Smith has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief and record discloses no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.