alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2388 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the postponement 

of certain deadlines by reason of significant fires. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2019 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

the postponement of certain deadlines by reason of significant fires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO POSTPONE CERTAIN TAX DEAD4 LINES BY REASON OF SIGNIFICANT FIRES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7508A of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘, a significant fire,’’ after 

8 ‘‘federally declared disaster (as defined in section 

9 165(h)(3)(C)(i))’’ in subsection (a), 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2388 IS

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘, fire,’’ after ‘‘disaster’’ each 

2 place it appears in subsections (a)(1) and (b), and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub4 section: 

5 ‘‘(d) SIGNIFICANT FIRE.—For purposes of this sec6 tion, the term ‘significant fire’ means any fire with respect 

7 to which assistance is provided under section 420 of the 

8 Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assist9 ance Act.’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

11 (1) The heading of section 7508A of the Inter12 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting 

13 ‘‘, SIGNIFICANT FIRE,’’ after ‘‘FEDERALLY DE14 CLARED DISASTER’’. 

15 (2) The item relating to section 7508A in the 

16 table of sections for chapter 77 of such Code is 

17 amended by inserting ‘‘, significant fire,’’ after ‘‘fed18 erally declared disaster’’. 

19 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 this section shall apply to fires for which assistance is pro21 vided after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5285 

To condition eligibility for a Federal license to deal in firearms on the 

passage of an online behavioral awareness training course, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2018 

Mr. MAST (for himself and Mr. THOMAS J. ROONEY of Florida) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To condition eligibility for a Federal license to deal in firearms on the passage of an online behavioral awareness 

training course, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Behavioral Awareness 

5 Training Act of 2018’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5285 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR A FEDERAL LICENSE TO DEAL IN 

2 FIREARMS CONDITIONED ON PASSAGE OF A 

3 BEHAVIORAL AWARENESS TRAINING 

4 COURSE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 923(d) of title 18, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1)— 

8 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of sub9 paragraph (F); 

10 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

11 subparagraph (G) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(H) in the case of an application to be licensed 

14 as a dealer, the applicant has successfully completed 

15 the course of study developed under paragraph (3).’’; 

16 and 

17 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(3) The Attorney General shall, directly or by con19 tract, develop (using best practices and science) a course 

20 of study that— 

21 ‘‘(A) uses behavioral analysis training materials 

22 to help applicants for a license to deal in firearms 

23 identify suspicious behavior by potential firearms 

24 purchasers; and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5285 IH

1 ‘‘(B) is accessible and may be completed, 

2 through the Internet website of the Bureau of Alco3 hol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.’’. 

4 (b) LIMITATION ON LIABILITY.—Section 923 of such 

5 title is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(m) A licensed dealer shall not be liable in an action 

7 at law for damages predicated on having completed the 

8 course of study developed under subsection (a)(3).’’. 

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 subsections (a)(1) and (b) of this section shall take effect 

11 on the date that is 1 year after the date of the enactment 

12 of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET & CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-04-1996             AUG-03-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-31-1995             AUG-05-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-04-1996             AUG-03-1997
<CASH>                                           6,021                   6,769
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,445                  20,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                       823                   1,873
<INVENTORY>                                        867                     952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,348                  29,695
<PP&E>                                          76,382                 124,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,717                  30,889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,827                 132,237
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,706                  27,866
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                      96
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,143                  49,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,827                 132,237
<SALES>                                         70,028                  84,527
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,028                  84,527
<CGS>                                           43,411                  53,184
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,411                  53,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,281                  26,074
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,906                   3,887
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,430                   1,382
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (994)                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,424                   1,382
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,424                   1,382
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37                    0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37                    0.16
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5396 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5396

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow graduate students 
            to exclude tuition reductions from gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2018

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois (for himself and Mr. Capuano) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow graduate students 
            to exclude tuition reductions from gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Graduate Assistants Parity Act'' or 
as the ``GAP Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF TUITION REDUCTIONS FROM GROSS INCOME OF GRADUATE 
              STUDENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 117(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``(below the graduate level)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 117(d) of such Code is amended 
by striking paragraph (5).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received in taxable years beginning after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2011124EN.01002401.xml

| 27.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 124/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124/24

---

Corrigendum to MEDIA 2007 — Call for proposals — EACEA/05/11 — Support for the implementation of pilot projects

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 121 of 19 April 2011
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 121 of 19 April 2011

2011/C 124/14

On page 65, Section 5 ‘Budget’, delete the last paragraph ‘When submitting proposals, applicants may opt for a one-year agreement or for a three-year framework partnership agreement.’

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 13, 2021

b0810

Order 

Clerk

August 13, 2021

163170

In re DAVIS/ORR/URSERY/WALLER/

CUNINGAN, Minors. SC: 163170

COA: 354120

Wayne CC Family Division: 2013-514697-NA

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2021 judgment 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
NIOSH Respiratory Protective Device Information 

 NIOSH CA 2022-1042 

 January 2022 

 

Effective Immediately: Voluntary Rescission of ALG Health Approvals
Document Number

NIOSH CA 2022 - 1042

Page 2 of 2

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has honored a request by ALG 

Health to voluntarily rescind ALL NIOSH respirator approvals issued to ALG Health. The 13 rescinded

approval numbers are provided below. 

As of January 6, 2022, any respirator marked with a NIOSH approval label indicating any of the 

approval numbers below is no longer NIOSH-approved. The NIOSH Certified Equipment List will no 

longer include these approval numbers. 

TC-84A-9259, TC-84A -9262, TC-84A-9270, TC-84A-9271, TC-84A-9273, TC-84A-9274, TC-84A-9275, 

TC-84A-9280, TC-84A-9281, TC-84A-9282, TC- 84A-9288, TC-84A-9290, and TC-84A-9292

 

Due to the voluntary rescission of these NIOSH approvals, respirators bearing any of the NIOSH 

approval numbers listed above may no longer be manufactured, assembled, sold, or distributed.

Please reach out to ALG Health for additional details related to their decision to voluntarily rescind the 

approvals identified in this notice. The Certified Equipment List can be used to locate other NIOSH 

approved respirators. 

Effective Immediately: Voluntary Rescission of ALG Health Approvals
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended Sept. 30, 2008 of CFO Consultants, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Norm LeBoeufNorm LeBoeufChief Executive Officer/s/ Norm LeBoeufNorm LeBoeufChief Financial OfficerDated: October 16, 2008   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CFO Consultants, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011081EN.01000502.xml

| 15.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6125 — Reale/Unnim/CSG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 81/03

On 8 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6125. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6125. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130989 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130989 COA: 265030 Saginaw CC: 00-018916-FH DERRICK LASHONE BRADDOCK, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 11, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

s1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

J.P. OWENS, JR.,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-183-RS-GRJ

WALTER A McNEIL,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 34). 

No objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 8) is DENIED.

3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner 

has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on August 12, 2013.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5300 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5300

To provide agencies with discretion in securing information technology 
                        and information systems.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2018

  Mr. Palmer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide agencies with discretion in securing information technology 
                        and information systems.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Information Systems 
Safeguards Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. AGENCY DISCRETION TO SECURE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND 
              INFORMATION SYSTEMS.

    (a) In General.--The authority described under subsection (b) may 
not be--
            (1) limited by a collective bargaining agreement, 
        memorandum of agreement, or any other agreement entered into 
        before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act pursuant 
        to chapter 71 of title 5, United States Code; or
            (2) negotiated under section 7106(b) or any other section 
        of such chapter 71.
    (b) Authority Covered.--The authority described in this subsection 
is the authority of the head of an agency, pursuant to section 3554 of 
title 44, United States Code, to take any action to limit, restrict, or 
prohibit access to a website or to test, deploy, or update a 
cybersecurity measure if the head of the agency determines such action 
is necessary to carry out the responsibilities of the head of the 
agency under such section 3554.
    (c) Definition of Agency.--In this section, the term ``agency'' has 
the meaning given the term in section 3502 of title 44, United States 
Code.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50824 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DANIEL JIMENEZ-VASQUEZ, also known as Alejandro Saenz-Lugo, also known as Daniel Cruz-Cruz, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-308-ALL-PRM

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Daniel JimenezVasquez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.