alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 27 (Friday, February 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 6223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-586]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Notice of Intent To Grant a Partially Exclusive License; Symbiont 
Enterprises, Inc.

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 37 CFR 404(a)(1)(i), 
the Department of the Army announces the intent to grant a revocable, 
non-assignable, partially exclusive license to Symbiont Enterprises, 
Inc., Huntsville, AL, for the AWarE Video Elements (AVE) government-
owned software for archiving and conducting searches of video data.

DATES: Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license can file 
written objections, along with supporting evidence, if any, within 15 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Written objections are to be filed with the Office of 
Research and Technology Applications, SDMC-RDTC-TDL (Ms. Susan D. 
McRae), Bldg. 5220, Von Braun Complex, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Joan Gilsdorf, Patent Attorney, e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ef4f1fff0b0f9f7f2edfaf1ecf8deedf3fafdb0ffecf3e7b0f3f7f2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="dab0b5bbb4f4bdb3b6a9beb5a8bc9aa9b7beb9f4bba8b7a3f4b7b3b6">[email protected]</span></a>; (256) 955-3213 or Ms. Susan D. 
McRae, Office of Research and Technology Applications, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9cefe9effdf2b2f1ffeefdf9dceff1f8ffb2fdeef1e5b2f1f5f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="166563657778387b7564777356657b72753877647b6f387b7f7a">[email protected]</span></a>; (256) 955-1501.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-586 Filed 2-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 1 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 2 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 3 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 4 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 5 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 6 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 7 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 8 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 9 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 10 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 11 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 12 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 13 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 14 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 15 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 16 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 17 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 18 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 19 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 20 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 21 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 22 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 23 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 24 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00038-RH-WCS   Document 84   Filed 10/15/10   Page 25 of 25
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following RegistrationStatements Nos. 333-20549, 333-65459, 333-38568, 333-88836, 333-129922 and 333-148139 on Form S-8, Nos. 333-123246, 333-138067 and 333-148186 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 28, 2008, relating to the financial statements and financialstatement schedule of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the Company’s adoption of FASB Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in IncomeTaxes*in 2007 and the adoption of FASB Statement No. 123R, *Share-Based**Payment*in 2006), and the effectiveness of Powerwave Technologies, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report onForm 10-K of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 30, 2007. 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

Costa Mesa, California 

February 28, 2008
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION

I, George Ivakhnik, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Independent Film Development Corporation;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   June 30, 2008





/s/ George Ivakhnik

George Ivakhnik

Chief Financial Officer, and Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA 

 No. 116PA13  

FILED 7 MARCH 2014 

SHEILA GREGORY, Administratrix of the Estate of TRAVIS BRYAN KIDD 

  v.  

BARRY BLAINE PEARSON, in his individual capacity 

 ________________________________________________________________ 

SHEILA GREGORY, Administratrix of the Estate of TRAVIS BRYAN KIDD  

  v. 

 CLEVELAND COUNTY, Self-McNeilly Solid Waste Management Facility   

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 from the decision of a 

unanimous panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 736 S.E.2d 577 (2012), 

reversing an order entered on 23 March 2012 by Judge Richard Doughton in 

Superior Court, Cleveland County.  Heard in the Supreme Court on 18 February 

2014. 

James M. Roane III for plaintiff-appellee. 

Teague Campbell Dennis & Gorham, L.L.P., by William A. Bulfer and 

Rebecca Rausch; and Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP, by Sean F. 

Perrin and Jackson Price, for defendant-appellants.  

Patterson Harkavy LLP, by Narendra K. Ghosh; and Sumwalt Law Firm, by 

Vernon Sumwalt, for North Carolina Advocates for Justice, amicus curiae. 

Amy Bason, General Counsel, for North Carolina Association of County 

Commissioners; and Paul Cranfill for North Carolina Association of Self 

Insurers, amici curiae.  

GREGORY V. PEARSON 

Opinion of the Court 

-2-  

Hedrick Gardner Kincheloe & Garofalo, LLP, by M. Duane Jones, for North 

Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae. 

Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP, by Jillian M. Benson, for North 

Carolina Association of Staffing Professionals, amicus curiae. 

K&L Gates LLP, by A. Lee Hogewood, III, for North Carolina Chamber, 

amicus curiae. 

 PER CURIAM.  

Justice BEASLEY took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.  

The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members 

voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of 

Appeals.  Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and 

stands without precedential value.  See, e.g., Goldston v. State, 364 N.C. 416, 700 

S.E.2d 223 (2010).  

AFFIRMED.
Amendment


 


Both parties agree to following amendments
to the agreement entered in on May 27th, 2014 between Oxford City Football Club, Inc. (Buyer) and Angela K. Artemik (Seller) due
to the Seller not being able to deliver the change in ownership to the accredited school.


 


The amendments are as follows:


 


1.          
Seller waves all rights to all one million (1,000,000) restricted shares that were to be issued
upon successful completion of the sale and transfer of the ACCSC accredited school.


 


2.          
Seller will repay the cumulative amount owed to the Buyer in the amount of $105,839.06 to
the Buyer. This amount is the total amount that has been acknowledged by the Seller as an amount owed to the Buyer as seen in Exhibit
A.


 


3.          
Buyer will return any and all equity interest Academy of Healing Arts, Massage, & Facial
Skin, Inc. to the Seller.


 


4.          
Seller may continue to attempt to get the change of ownership approved by ACCSC to then be
presented to the Buyer at a later time in the future.


 


 


 


/s/ Angela Artemik


Angela Artemik


 


Academy of Healing Arts, Massage, & Facial
Skin, Inc.


 


 


 


/s/ Thomas Anthony Guerriero


Thomas Anthony Guerriero


 


Oxford City Football Club, Inc.
# C_2010307EN.01000101.xml

| 12.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 November 2010

2010/C 307/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3700 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,78 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4538 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84910 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3102 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3282 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0910 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,634 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 276,54 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9329 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2865 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9540 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3682 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3742 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6198 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7495 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7646 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 520,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4674 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0772 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3727 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 206,66 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2442 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,089 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,9220 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,710 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3491 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7769 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,9310 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3700

JPY

Japanese yen

112,78

DKK

Danish krone

7,4538

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84910

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3102

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3282

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0910

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,634

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

276,54

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9329

RON

Romanian leu

4,2865

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9540

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3682

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3742

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6198

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7495

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7646

KRW

South Korean won

1 520,57

ZAR

South African rand

9,4674

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0772

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3727

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 206,66

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2442

PHP

Philippine peso

60,089

RUB

Russian rouble

41,9220

THB

Thai baht

40,710

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3491

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7769

INR

Indian rupee

60,9310

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Randy M. Griffin,
Chief Executive Officer of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc.



|                   |        |                              
|------------------ | ------ | -----------------------------
|                   | By:    | /s/  RANDY
        M. GRIFFIN
|Date: May 15, 2012 | Name:  | Randy M. Griffin             
|                   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer      



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE v. GEORGE VOLNEY McCALL, JR.

(Filed 28 February, 1968.)

1. Escape § 1; Constitutional Law § 86—

Sentence of six months imprisonment imposed upon defendant’s plea of guilty to a charge of felonious escape is not cruel and unusual in the constitutional sense, the sentence not exceeding the statutory maximum.

2. Escape § 1; Criminal Law § 138—

The court will not review defendant’s loss of rewards and privileges for good conduct upon his conviction of felonious escape, since the Prison Commission has been given authority to promulgate and apply rules in this regard and the matter being administrative and not judicial. G.S. 148-13.

Huskins, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Appeal by defendant from *Anglin, J.,*July 1967 Regular Criminal Session of Haywood. This case was docketed and argued at the Fall Term 1967 as No. 13.

Defendant was serving a two-year prison sentence imposed at February 1965 Session of Superior Court of Transylvania County upon conviction of felonious assault. On or about June 1966 he escaped from the custody of the North Carolina State prison system and was apprehended 22 March 1967.

G.S. 148-13 authorizes the State prison system to grant certain privileges and rewards as an inducement to good conduct, ineluding *136the allowance of time for good behavior. At the time of his escape, defendant had earned approximately six months “good time”, so that with this credit he had only about 28 days left to serve on the two-year, sentence.

Bill of indictment was returned against defendant charging him with felonious escape, to which he entered a plea of guilty. The trial judge entered judgment that defendant be confined in the common jail pf Haywood County for a period of six months, to be assigned to work under the State Prison Department.

Defendant appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton and Deputy Attorney General McGal-liard for the State.*

*Millar ■& Alley for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Defendant contends that the sentence imposed constitutes cruel and unusual punishment within the prohibitions of Article I, Section 14 of the Constitution of North Carolina.

The sentence imposed does not exceed the maximum prescribed by the applicable statute, so a¡s to violate defendant’s constitutional rights. *State v. LePard,*270 N.C. 157, 153 S.E. 2d 875; G.S. 148-45. Neither does the additional loss of the “good' time” support defendant’s contention.

> .“. . . The prison rules and regulations respecting rewards and privileges for good conduct (“good time”) are strictly administrative and not judicial. G.S. 148-13. The legislature has authorized the State Prison Commission to promulgate, publish, enforce and apply such rules. G.S. 148-11. Whether a prisoner shall benefit.thereby depends on his own conduct. The giving or withholding of the rewards and privileges under these rules is not a matter with which the courts are authorized to deal.” *State v. Garris,*265 N.C. 711, 144 S.E. 2d 901.

Affirmed.

Hustcins) J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, George Ivakhnik, certify that:





(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Independent Film Development Corporation;





(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and





(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.





Date:   August 8, 2008





/s/ George Ivakhnik

George Ivakhnik

Chief Financial Officer, and Director
# C_2010243EN.01001002.xml

| 10.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/10

---

Corrigendum to Call for expressions of interest for placement on the reserve list of the Scientific Panels and the Scientific Committee of the European Food Safety Authority (Parma, Italy)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 151 of 10 June 2010
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 151 of 10 June 2010

2010/C 243/06

On page 14, ‘Closing date for sending applications’:

for:

‘... 15 September 2010 ...’,

read:

‘... 30 September 2010 ...’.

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 6, 2011

t0829 

# Order

September 6, 2011

143172

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143172 COA: 296732 Wayne CC: 09-007971-FH ALBERT THOMAS ANDERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 26, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2009283EN.01002301.xml

| 24.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/23

---

Call for proposals under the work programme of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

2009/C 283/09

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the work programmes of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call in the Cooperation Specific Programme: Information and Communication Technologies: FP7-ICT-2009-6.

Cooperation Specific Programme: Information and Communication Technologies: FP7-ICT-2009-6.

Call documentation including deadline and budget is given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website:

http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---