alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009130EN.01000201.xml

| 9.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/2

---

Special Report No 3/2009 ‘The effectiveness of Structural measures spending on waste water treatment for the 1994-1999 and 2000-2006 programme periods’

2009/C 130/02

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 3/2009 ‘The effectiveness of Structural Measures spending on waste water treatment for the 1994-1999 and 2000-2006 programme periods’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website:

www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU Bookshop.

---
# C_2011030EN.01000101.xml

| 29.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/1

---

2011/C 30/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 13, 15.1.2011

OJ C 13, 15.1.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 346, 18.12.2010

OJ C 328, 4.12.2010

OJ C 317, 20.11.2010

OJ C 301, 6.11.2010

OJ C 288, 23.10.2010

OJ C 274, 9.10.2010

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-40905

Summary Calendar

TEXAS PROPERTY AND CASUALTY

INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION,

Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant,

VERSUS

BLANCA CABRERA, Individually and on behalf of

the Estate of Octavio Villarreal Cabrera, Decedent,

and as Next Friend of the Minor Children, Jazel

Cabrera and Octavio Cabrera, Jr.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(G-97-CV-58)

June 30, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts and relevant portions of the record itself. For
the reasons stated by the district court in its Order entered under

date of July 17, 1997, we AFFIRM the Final Judgment and Order of

Disbursement in favor of the defendants as set forth therein.
# C_2010012EN.01S00301.xml

| 19.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/s3

---

NOTICE

On 19 January 2010, in Official Journal of the European Union C 12 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — 1st supplement to the 28th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:11cr2-SPM

MICHAEL FORD, 

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One and Two of this

indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing

Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a

report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties

consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it

is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.
Page 2 of 3

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:11cr2-SPM/WCS
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on April 13, 2011. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:11cr2-SPM/WCS
# C_2010292EN.01000102.xml

| 28.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 292/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5994 — Apotheek Docmorris/K-Mail Order/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 292/02

On 20 October 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5994. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5994. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:09cr50-SPM/AK

STEVEN EUGENE PASSMORE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

PRELIMINARY ORDER ON SUBPOENAS

The Court has received from Defendant Passmore four subpoenas that

have been filled in and submitted to the clerk for service. Defendant must

comply with the provisions of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(b) before

the subpoenas will be issued.

The concerns Defendant raises in his “Ex Parte Communication” letter,

which the Court will order to be filed under seal, have been made moot by the

submission of the subpoenas. Defendant is again advised, however, that by

representing himself he is in charge of his own defense. Accordingly, if

Defendant is convicted in this case, ineffectiveness of stand-by counsel is not a
Page 2 of 2

ground to overturn the conviction. Based on the foregoing, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The clerk shall file Defendant’s letter under seal. No action will be

taken on the letter.

2. The clerk shall hold Defendant’s subpoenas. The subpoenas will 

not be issued unless ordered by the Court upon application by Defendant in

accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(b). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of December, 2009.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:09cr50-SPM/AK
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 221 (Friday, November 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 64671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Department Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby 
given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Kenneth L. 
Mims and Leonard R. Cannon AKA Robby Cannon, Civil No. 2:07-cv-03624-
PMD, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District 
of South Carolina on November 8, 2007.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Kenneth L. Mims and Leonard R. Cannon AKA Robby 
Cannon, pursuant to section 301(a) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 
1311(a), to obtain injunctive relief and impose civil penalties against 
the Defendants for violating the Clean Water Act by discharging fill 
material without a permit into waters of the United States. The 
proposed Consent Decree resolves these allegations by requiring the 
Defendants to pay a civil penalty. In addition, Defendants have agreed 
to a restoration plan which includes removing the sediment material 
deposited by the unpermitted dredging.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Emery Clark, 
Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, 
Wachovia Building, Suite 500, 1441 Main Street, Columbia, South 
Carolina 29201, and refer to United States v. Kenneth L. Mims and 
Leonard R. Cannon AKA Robby Cannon, United States District Court for 
the District of South Carolina, Civil No. 2:07-cv-03624-PMD.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, 901 
Richland Lane, Columbia, South Carolina. In addition, the proposed 
Consent Decree may be viewed at http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/Consent_Decrees.html.

Stephen Samuels,
Assistant Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment & Natural 
Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 07-5690 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Soy Energy, LLC (the
Company) for the quarter ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Sand,
President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

| |                                                      | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
| | /s/ Charles
 Sand                                    | 
| |                                                      | 
| | Charles
 Sand, President and Chief Executive Officer | 
| | (Principal
 Executive Officer)                       | 
| |                                                      | 
| | Dated:
 September 14, 2010                           | 

---
Exhibit 23.2



LETTER OF CONSENT



We hereby consent to the reference to our
reports, as detailed below, in the annual report on form 20-F of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (hereinafter: "XTL") for
the year ending December 31, 2012, dated April 25, 2013.



| | · | Impairment examination study of XTL's intangible asset, dated March 24, 2013
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | · | Purchase Price Allocation of Proteologics Ltd., dated March 24, 2013
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------

| | · | Purchase Price Allocation of InterCure Ltd., dated November 25, 2012
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ BDO Ziv Haft Consulting and Management Ltd.



Tel Aviv, Israel

April 25, 2013
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



--------------------------------------------------------------------



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powergae, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Kovalenko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  May 1, 2009 |  | By:  /s/ Andrew Kovalenko                                                                  
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |                                                                                            
|                   |  | Andrew Kovalenko
Chairman, President Chief Executive Officer 
(Principle Executive Officer)



27



|
|
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas M. Polinsky, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph A. Geraci, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Douglas M. Polinsky 
| | ------------------------
| | Douglas M. Polinsky     
| | Chief Executive Officer 
| |                         
| | November 14, 2019       
| |                         
| |                         
| | /s/ Joseph A. Geraci, II
| | Joseph A. Geraci, II    
| | Chief Financial Officer 
| |                         
| | November 14, 2019
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DEONTE WALKER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:09cv322-SPM/WCS

DILLARD’S INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Plaintiff’s Notice of Resolution (doc. 11) advising that this case

has settled, and Northern District of Florida Local Rule 16.2(D), it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

2. The Court retains jurisdiction for a period of 60 days, during which

time any party may move to reopen for good cause shown.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
#### STATE v. BRINCEFIELD

No. 75 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 49.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 December 1979.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cr-050-001/RS

RONNIE B. FINCH,

Defendant. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

The relief requested in Defendant’s Motion to Extend Report Date (Doc. 32) is 

GRANTED. The Government has represented that it takes no position on the matter. 

The Defendant’s report date is rescheduled. The Defendant shall surrender to the 

United States Marshal for this district or the designated institution on Friday, February 

18, 2011, by 12:00 Noon C.S.T. 

ORDERED on January 27, 2011

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# CA2010254EN.01001001.xml

| 22.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 254/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 254/10

---

RESERVE LISTS (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITIONS EPSO/AST/91/09 AND EPSO/AST/92/09

ASSISTANTS (AST 3)

IN THE FIELDS OF OFFSET PRINTING AND PRE-PRESSE

(2010/C 254 A/03)

EPSO/AST/91/09 — ‘OFFSET PRINTING’ FIELD

| D'ARMIENTO | Angelo |
| --- | --- |
| DE DECKER | Peter |
| HUYBRECHTS | Christophe |
| MARX | Christoph |
| SNIJDERS | Eric |

D'ARMIENTO

Angelo

DE DECKER

Peter

HUYBRECHTS

Christophe

MARX

Christoph

SNIJDERS

Eric

EPSO/AST/92/09 — ‘PRE-PRESS’ FIELD

Merit Group 1

| DRESMANIS | Andris |
| --- | --- |
| GROTARD | Marianne |
| HODOR (BRASOVEANU) | Hedda-Elvira |
| PASITKA | Robert |
| PLOVIER | Blandine |
| POULIAKIS | Georgia |
| STAMPE | Jérôme |
| VANBELLINGHEN | Sandra |

DRESMANIS

Andris

GROTARD

Marianne

HODOR (BRASOVEANU)

Hedda-Elvira

PASITKA

Robert

PLOVIER

Blandine

POULIAKIS

Georgia

STAMPE

Jérôme

VANBELLINGHEN

Sandra

Merit Group 2

| ANDERLIN | Valérie |
| --- | --- |
| BARBANGELO (VERNACOTOLA) | Pascale |
| COCIAN | Viktor |
| GYÖRÖSI | Imre |
| NEAGU | Tudor Octavian |
| PAWILOJC | Sebastian |
| SPERTINI | Alessandro |
| VAN LANDEGEM | Filip |

ANDERLIN

Valérie

BARBANGELO (VERNACOTOLA)

Pascale

COCIAN

Viktor

GYÖRÖSI

Imre

NEAGU

Tudor Octavian

PAWILOJC

Sebastian

SPERTINI

Alessandro

VAN LANDEGEM

Filip

Merit Group 3

| AMAR | Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |
| BÄHR (REUTER) | Nadine |
| GENOVA | Maia |
| MARQUEZ | Juan |
| SZKOPANSKI | Maciej |

AMAR

Emmanuel

BÄHR (REUTER)

Nadine

GENOVA

Maia

MARQUEZ

Juan

SZKOPANSKI

Maciej

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2011 and may be extended.

31 December 2011

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---