alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67289-67290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5865]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

[Docket No. USAF-2007-0026]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by December 
28, 2007.
    Title, Form and OMB Number: Presentation Comment Card and Air Force 
Week Event Comment Card; ROTC Form 155-R; OMB Control Number 0701-TBD.
    Type of Request: New.
    Number of Respondents: 2,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 2,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 6 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 200.
    Needs and Uses: The information collection requirement is necessary 
to obtain audience feedback data in order to improve future Air Force 
presentations and future Air Force Week on-base public events. The data 
that is collected will be used to improve these communication products. 
The respondents will be attendees at these events and participation 
will be anonymous and voluntary.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondent's Obligation: Voluntary.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Hillary Jaffe.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jaffe at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the 
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without 
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
    DoD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings and WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.


[[Page 67290]]


    Dated: November 20, 2007.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-5865 Filed 11-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
# C_2010340EN.01000201.xml

| 15.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6018 — KKR/HgCapital/Archangel)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 340/03

On 29 November 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6018. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6018. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2515 

To require the Food and Drug Administration to conduct a study on the 

effects of radiofrequency radiation in the 5G networks on human health. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 19, 2019 

Mr. MERKLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require the Food and Drug Administration to conduct 

a study on the effects of radiofrequency radiation in 

the 5G networks on human health. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telecommunications 

5 Safety Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STUDY ON THE EFFECTS OF 5G NETWORKS ON 

7 HUMAN HEALTH. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Health and 

9 Human Services (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Sec10 retary’’), acting through the Commissioner of Food and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2515 IS

1 Drugs and in cooperation with the Federal Communica2 tions Commission, shall conduct a study on the effects of 

3 radiofrequency radiation on human health, which shall in4 clude research on human health effects of the wavelengths 

5 of such radiation at the levels expected to be used in the 

6 fifth-generation mobile networks, including effects on the 

7 human reproductive system and connections to illnesses 

8 such as cancer (including malignant tumor growths) and 

9 Alzheimer’s disease. 

10 (b) REPORTS.—The Secretary shall submit to Con11 gress— 

12 (1) not later than 6 months after the date of 

13 enactment of this Act, a preliminary report on the 

14 study conducted under subsection (a); and 

15 (2) not later than 1 year after the date of en16 actment of this Act, a final report on such study. 

17 The reports submitted under this subsection shall include 

18 the Secretary’s plans for future research on the effects of 

19 radiofrequency radiation on human health. 

20 (c) SAFETY STANDARDS.—The Secretary shall de21 velop standards of safety with respect to human health 

22 for telecommunications equipment, based on the findings 

23 of the study under subsection (a). 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2515 IS

1 SEC. 3. STUDY ON FUTURE NETWORKS. 

2 The Secretary, acting through the Commissioner of 

3 Food and Drugs and in cooperation with the Federal Com4 munications Commission, shall conduct studies on any mo5 bile networks that follow the fifth-generation mobile net6 works, and shall complete any such study not later than 

7 1 year after such network becomes operational. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 13, 2017

d1010

Order 

Clerk

October 13, 2017

156434

In re ALLEN, Minors. SC: 156434

COA: 336285

Wayne CC Family Division:

07-470130-NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2017 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6868
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH J. SCHEPIS, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-91-425-3, CA-95-4010-17-3) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 2, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph J. Schepis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Eric William Ruschky, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Joseph J. Schepis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Un ited States v. Schepis , Nos. CR-91-425-3; CA-95-4010-17-3 (D.S.C. May 14, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion to stay the case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PRIME SUCCESSION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES, FOR THE YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,892
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,916
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,216
<INVENTORY>                                      4,104
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,120
<PP&E>                                          79,013
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 414,144
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          225,347
<BONDS>                                         12,909
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     128,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   414,144
<SALES>                                         90,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,514
<CGS>                                           63,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   63,086
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,094
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,604
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,943
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,318)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,318)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
# Assignment of Functions Under the Darfur Peace and 

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I hereby assign to you the functions of the President under sections 6(a), 6(b), and 6(f) of the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-344). In performing such functions, you shall consult with other heads of departments and agencies, as appropriate. 

                    You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     **Federal Register.**

[FR Doc. 07-512

Billing code 4710-10-P
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November      13, 2009 | /s/ Douglas Polinsky         |   |
|------------------------|------------------------------|--------|
|                   | Douglas      Polinsky        |   |
|                   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                   |                         |   |
| November      13, 2009 | /s/ Joseph A. Geraci, II     |   |
|                   | Joseph      A. Geraci, II    |   |
|                   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
#### BANKING COMM. v. BANK

No. 91 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 283.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 13 June 1972.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ODELL RUTLEDGE, JR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00160-MP -GRJ

ALACHUA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT OF FLORIDA, WILLIAM EZZELL, MARK W

MOSELEY,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 13, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that this case be dismissed as frivolous. The time for filing

objections has passed, and none have been filed. The Court agrees that the plaintiff's claims are

indecipherable and frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. This case is dismissed, and the Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of November, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# C_2010066EN.01001401.xml

| 17.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/14

---

Call for proposals for modal shift, catalyst, motorways of the sea, traffic avoidance and common learning actions under the second Marco Polo Programme

(Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council — OJ L 328, 24.11.2006, p. 1)

(Regulation (EC) No 1692/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council — OJ L 328, 24.11.2006, p. 1)

2010/C 66/07

The European Commission is hereby launching a call for proposals for the selection procedure 2010 under the second Marco Polo Programme. The call is closing on 18 May 2010.

Information on the modalities of the call and guidance to proposers on how to submit projects, is available at the following website:

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/marcopolo/calls/2010_en.htm

The helpdesk of the Marco Polo Programme can be reached via e-mail: eaci-marco-polo-helpdesk@ec.europa.eu and fax: +32 22979506.

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-139464, 333-142642, 333-146216 and 333-147200 on Form S-3 and Nos. 333-145079 and 333-135366 on Form S-8 of our report, dated July 24, 2007, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Oilsands Quest Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2008. 

 

/s/ Pannell Kerr Forster

 

Registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board as “Smythe Ratcliffe”            INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

            Vancouver, Canada            March 18, 2009
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 GERALD WYNN JANECKA,

3 Petitioner-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 33,822

5 ELIZABETH LOUISE JANECKA,

6 Respondent-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY

8 John F. Davis, District Judge

9 Law Office of Clifton L. Davidson, LLC

10 Clifton L. Davidson

11 Albuquerque, NM

12 for Appellee

13 L. Helen Bennett

14 Albuquerque, NM

15 for Appellant

16 MEMORANDUM OPINION

17 WECHSLER, Judge.
2

1 {1} Respondent appeals from the district court’s order denying her Rule 1-060

2 NMRA motion for relief from judgment. On March 2, 2015, this Court issued a

3 calendar notice proposing to affirm. Petitioner filed a memorandum in support of this

4 Court’s notice of proposed disposition. Respondent has not filed a memorandum in

5 opposition to this Court’s notice, and the time for doing so has now passed. “Failure

6 to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed

7 in the calendar notice.” Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861

8 P.2d 287. This Court therefore affirms the district court’s order for the reasons

9 provided in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition. 

10 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

11 ________________________________

12 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

13 WE CONCUR:

14 ________________________________

15 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

16 ________________________________

17 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
# C_2010241EN.01000201.xml

| 8.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 September 2010

2010/C 241/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2744 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4449 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83160 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3185 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2903 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8910 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,726 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 286,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9371 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2919 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9267 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3982 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3286 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8992 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7663 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7179 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 500,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2722 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6550 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2820 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 493,73 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9850 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,789 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,2537 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,740 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2011 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6156 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,6680 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2744

JPY

Japanese yen

106,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4449

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83160

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3185

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2903

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8910

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,726

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

286,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9371

RON

Romanian leu

4,2919

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9267

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3982

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3286

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8992

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7663

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7179

KRW

South Korean won

1 500,26

ZAR

South African rand

9,2722

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6550

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2820

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 493,73

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9850

PHP

Philippine peso

56,789

RUB

Russian rouble

39,2537

THB

Thai baht

39,740

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2011

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6156

INR

Indian rupee

59,6680

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSHUA S. FRIEBEL and ELIZABETH

F. FRIEBEL,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv120/RS-MD

PARADISE SHORES OF BAY COUNTY,

LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company;

ROBERT E. BLACKERBY; and MAGNUM

CAPITAL, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability

Company,

Defendants

_________________________________/

ORDER

Plaintiffs’ Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. 121) is denied.

ORDERED on February 8, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00120-RS-CJK Document 140 Filed 02/08/11 Page 1 of 1
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7342

JAMES BENJAMIN PUCKETT , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. HECTOR JOYNER, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Estill, South Carolina , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. David C. Norton , District Judge. ( 1:18

- cv
- 02404

- DCN )

Submitted : April 4, 2019 Decided: April 9, 2019

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
James Benjamin Puckett, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: James Benjamin Puckett , a federal pr isoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. * The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended di smissing the petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and advised Puckett that failure to file timely, specific objections to the recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
recommendation. The timely f iling of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Massey v. Ojaniit , 759 F.3d 343, 352 (4th Cir. 2014) ; see Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985). Puckett has waived appellate review by failing to file objections. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* The district court’s order is final and appealable as no amendment could cure the defect identified in Puckett’s petition. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc. , 807 F.3d 619, 623

- 24 (4th Cir. 2015)