alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - - EN

*|*

#

**Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6260 — Reggeborgh/North Sea Group) — Candidate case for simplified procedure Text with EEA relevance **

*
Official Journal C 168 , 08/06/2011 P. 0014 - 0014 *

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.6260 — Reggeborgh/North Sea Group)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 168/05

1. On 30 May 2011, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] by which Reggeborgh Invest BV ("Reggeborgh", the Netherlands) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over North Sea Group Beheer BV ("North Sea Group", the Netherlands) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Reggeborgh: construction industry, especially in contracting and project development as well as property development,

- for North Sea Group: trade in and the supply of petroleum products for land and waterbound use, especially: bunkering of marine fuels, trade in marine fuels, waterbound transport of petroleum products, the storage of petroleum products, the storage of petroleum products and the non,-retail sales of petroleum products, and trading of bulk petroleum products and derivatives.

3. On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation [2] it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

4. The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6260 — Reggeborgh/North Sea Group, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the "EC Merger Regulation").

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 ("Notice on a simplified procedure").

--------------------------------------------------
# C_2011178EN.01000101.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6228 — Vivendi/SFR)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 178/01

On 9 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6228. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6228. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER LEE LUTHER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv111/RV/CJK

DAVID MORGAN, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff

commenced this civil rights action on February 28, 2011, by filing a complaint

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (doc. 1) and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc.

2). This court granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and assessed a $28.00

partial filing fee, giving plaintiff twenty-eight (28) days in which to submit the

fee (doc. 6). Plaintiff was advised that failure to comply would result in a

recommendation of dismissal (doc. 6). Having received no response from

plaintiff, with the exception of a letter that was returned as deficient, this court

issued an order giving plaintiff fourteen (14) days to show cause why this case

should not be dismissed (doc. 10). With the exception of one deficient pleading,

plaintiff has filed no response since his initial filing.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this cause be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for

plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with orders of the court.

Case 3:11-cv-00111-RV-CJK Document 11 Filed 05/16/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of May, 2011.

 

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITEDSTATESMAGISTRATEJUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within fourteen days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline

that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and

does not control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other

parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual

findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th

Cir. 1988).

Case No: 3:11cv111/RV/CJK

Case 3:11-cv-00111-RV-CJK Document 11 Filed 05/16/11 Page 2 of 2
# CA2010061EN.01001501.xml

| 12.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 61/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 61/15

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/75/08

SOCIAL WELFARE ASSISTANTS (AST 3)

(2010/C 61 A/03)

Merit Group 1

| CONSTANTIN | Cristina |
| --- | --- |
| HEREMANS | Corine |
| LENS | Jana |
| SANCHEZ SOSA | Gabriella |

CONSTANTIN

Cristina

HEREMANS

Corine

LENS

Jana

SANCHEZ SOSA

Gabriella

Merit Group 2

| CASTRES-WANTZ | Marie |
| --- | --- |
| LEHNBERG | Christiane |
| LENGLET | Alan |
| MARTIN | Peter Gary |
| MILITELLO | Luigi |
| MOONEN | Patrick |
| MORELLO | Maria Rosa |
| NEQUEST | Dominique |
| SAID | Victoria |
| SIMOES DE ALMEIDA | Anabela |
| T'SERSTEVENS | Delphine |
| VANTHUYNE | Marc |

CASTRES-WANTZ

Marie

LEHNBERG

Christiane

LENGLET

Alan

MARTIN

Peter Gary

MILITELLO

Luigi

MOONEN

Patrick

MORELLO

Maria Rosa

NEQUEST

Dominique

SAID

Victoria

SIMOES DE ALMEIDA

Anabela

T'SERSTEVENS

Delphine

VANTHUYNE

Marc

Merit Group 3

| BOCIEK | Katarzyna |
| --- | --- |
| BURGOS GUERRERO | Laura |
| DI MARINO | Barbara |
| FEILER | Verena |
| KARASIMOU | Dimitra |
| KOVARIK | Oto |
| LE MEUR | Yvonne |
| MACREZ | Damien |
| PATRASCU | Mihail |
| SIKORA | Daniel |
| TOSTE | Sandra |
| TREFOIS | Jerome |

BOCIEK

Katarzyna

BURGOS GUERRERO

Laura

DI MARINO

Barbara

FEILER

Verena

KARASIMOU

Dimitra

KOVARIK

Oto

LE MEUR

Yvonne

MACREZ

Damien

PATRASCU

Mihail

SIKORA

Daniel

TOSTE

Sandra

TREFOIS

Jerome

Merit Group 4

| BOLLAND | Benoit |
| --- | --- |
| BOUDRY | Stijn Henri |
| DE GENNARO L | uca |
| JAUHIAINEN-LARSSON | Kristina |
| LE MAIGNAN | Perrine |
| MUELAS MONTERO | Valle |
| PUCELJ | Bojan |
| RAMOS MARTINEZ | Leyre |
| VAISSADE | Charlotte |
| VICTORINO MARTINEZ | Patricia |

BOLLAND

Benoit

BOUDRY

Stijn Henri

DE GENNARO L

uca

JAUHIAINEN-LARSSON

Kristina

LE MAIGNAN

Perrine

MUELAS MONTERO

Valle

PUCELJ

Bojan

RAMOS MARTINEZ

Leyre

VAISSADE

Charlotte

VICTORINO MARTINEZ

Patricia

The reserve list will be valid until 31 December 2011 and may be extended.

31 December 2011

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
# C_2010309EN.01000401.xml

| 13.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 November 2010

2010/C 309/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3711 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4542 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85070 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3582 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3357 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1330 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,630 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 276,01 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9289 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2950 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9620 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3835 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3851 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6279 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7653 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7746 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 545,35 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5260 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1000 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3805 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 235,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2652 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,976 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,1700 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,859 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3560 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7919 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,1800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3711

JPY

Japanese yen

112,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4542

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85070

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3582

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3357

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1330

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,630

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

276,01

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9289

RON

Romanian leu

4,2950

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9620

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3835

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3851

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6279

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7653

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7746

KRW

South Korean won

1 545,35

ZAR

South African rand

9,5260

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1000

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3805

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 235,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2652

PHP

Philippine peso

59,976

RUB

Russian rouble

42,1700

THB

Thai baht

40,859

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3560

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7919

INR

Indian rupee

61,1800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2010254EN.01000301.xml

| 22.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 September 2010

2010/C 254/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3120 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4489 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84545 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1459 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3156 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9295 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,655 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 279,88 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9450 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2668 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9595 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3852 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3536 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1840 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7985 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7475 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 521,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3273 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8008 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2840 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 760,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0685 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,613 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,7955 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,337 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2710 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7411 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,9160 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3120

JPY

Japanese yen

112,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4489

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84545

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1459

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3156

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9295

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,655

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

279,88

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9450

RON

Romanian leu

4,2668

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9595

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3852

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3536

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1840

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7985

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7475

KRW

South Korean won

1 521,07

ZAR

South African rand

9,3273

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8008

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2840

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 760,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0685

PHP

Philippine peso

57,613

RUB

Russian rouble

40,7955

THB

Thai baht

40,337

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2710

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7411

INR

Indian rupee

59,9160

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Cite as 2015 Ark. 380

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

No. CR-15-274

JONATHAN BERKS

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

Opinion Delivered October 22, 2015

APPELLEE’S MOTION TO DISMISS

APPEAL

[GARLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT

COURT, NO. 26CR-10-248]

HONORABLE JOHN HOMER

WRIGHT, JUDGE

MOTION DENIED; BRIEFING

SCHEDULE TO BE SET.

PER CURIAM

Appellant Jonathan Berks filed a motion in this court to proceed with a belated appeal

of the dismissal of his timely petition under Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.1 (2014). 

Because Berks was not provided timely notice of an order that disposed of a motion for a ruling

on omitted issues, the motion was granted. Berks v. State, 2015 Ark. 234, 463 S.W.3d 289 (per

curiam). The appellee State has now filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the basis that Berks

failed to file a brief. We deny the motion.

Although the State asserts that Berks has failed to timely file his brief, through clerical

error, no briefing schedule was set. Berks has therefore not failed to submit a timely brief, and

our clerk is again directed to set a briefing schedule. 

Motion denied; briefing schedule to be set.
Exhibit 32(h)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





|/s/ Jay A. LewisJay A. Lewis
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Entergy Louisiana, LLC
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	August 7, 2008
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Barbara Lamb                                               |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Barbara Lamb                                                         |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  April 13, 2010                                                       |
# C_2010352EN.01000102.xml

| 23.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6065 — Axa Private Equity/CIR/KOS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 352/02

On 14 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6065. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6065. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### R. J. LYERLY, JR. and JOE J. WALKUP, Trading as SHERRILL’S SUPER MARKET, Petitioners v. NORTH CARROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, Respondent.

(Filed 18 June, 1965.)

Eminent Domain § 2—

Allegations to the effect that the Highway Commission maintained a culvert under a highway in such manner as to cause the waters of a creek, after a heavy rain, to wash away the foundation of the building leased by petitioners, causing the destruction of the wall of the building, resulting in damage to petitioners’ stock of goods, extra expense, and loss of profits, *held,*insufficient to state a cause of action for a “taking”, since no allowance may be had for damage to personal property as distinguished from fixtures.

Appeal by petitioners from *McConnell, J..,*November-December 1964 Session of Ieedell.

This appeal is from a judgment which sustained the State Highway Commission’s demurrer to the petition and dismissed “this proceeding.”

*Carswell & Justice and Hugh G. Mitchell for 'petitioner appellants.*

*Attorney General Bruton, Assistant Attorney General Lewis, Trial Attorney Rosser and R. A. Hedrick, Associate Counsel, for respondent appellee.*

Pee CüRiam.

As stated in petitioners’ brief, their allegations herein “are substantially identical with those” in the companion case of *Sherrill v. Highway Commission, ante,*643, 142 S.E. 2d 653. Petitioners alleged they, as lessees, operated a grocery store in the Sherrill building on South Center Street, Statesville, N. C., and that, on account of the destruction of the south wall of said building on October 14, 1959, (1) their stock of goods was damaged, (2) they incurred extra expense, and (3) they lost profits, to their damage in the aggregate amount of $2,800.00.

In *Midgett v. Highway Commission,*260 N.C. 241, 132 S.E. 2d 599, it was held the complaint stated “a legally cognizable cause of action for damages by reason of the appropriation of land for public use.” The plaintiff alleged valuable personal property was in the buildings on his lands. With reference thereto, the Court, in opinion by Moore, J., said: “The allegations of damage to personal property, however, are not sustained. Under the circumstances of this case and the permanent nuisance theory upon which it is maintained an action for the ‘taking’ of movable personal property may not be upheld. There is no permanent nuisance with respect to such property and the damage thereto is regarded as incidental and not direct. Furthermore, the Highway Com*650mission has no authority to appropriate personal property for public use. G.S. 136-19. ‘No allowance can be made for personal property, as distinguished from fixtures, located on the condemned premises. . . .' 29 C.J.S., Eminent Domain, § 175a (1), p. 1045. Under the facts alleged, any injury to personal property is *damnum absque injuria.*See *Williams v. Highway Commission,*252 N.C. 141, 113 S.E. 2d 263; *Pemberton v. Greensboro,*208 N.C. 466, 181 S.E. 258.”

Applying the law as stated in *Midgett,*it is held that the petition herein fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Hence, the judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1 - Principal Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Your Event, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering
this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended May 31, 2011 and filed with the U. S. Securities and
Exchange Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



   /s/ Marilyn Montgomery
----------------------------------
       Marilyn Montgomery
Its:   Principal Executive Officer
       Principal Financial Officer



Date  July 11, 2011
      -------------


<PAGE>