alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011220EN.01001701.xml

| 26.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/17

---

Corrigendum to the call for proposals under the multi-annual work programme 2011 for grants in the field of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) for the period 2007-2013

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 187 of 28 June 2011
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 187 of 28 June 2011

2011/C 220/04

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, is announcing a corrigendum to the call for proposals for projects in the field of European rail traffic management systems (ERTMS), under the multi-annual work programme for the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) for the period 2007-2013, as published in OJ C 187, 28 June 2011, p. 13.

The corrected text of the call for proposals is available on:

http://tentea.ec.europa.eu/en/apply_for_funding/follow_the_funding_process/calls_for_proposals_2011.htm

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MARSHON EUGENE DEMONS,

Petitioner, 

v. 3:10cv388-WS/MD

WALTER A. MCNEIL,

Respondent.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 9)

docketed November 22, 2010. The magistrate judge recommends that this case be

dismissed for failure to keep the court informed of his current address.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus, and this action, are hereby

DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and to keep the court informed of

his current address. 

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. 
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of December , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 31.1





Certification Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Jeff Ritchie, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Independent Film Development Corporation;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:  January 28, 2009



/s/  Jeff Ritchie

Jeff Ritchie

Chief Executive Officer, and Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Phenome Project.                    

*Date:*                         November 30, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge 6700, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817. (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ellen S. Buczko, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-451-2676,                         *ebuczko1@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 2, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5622  Filed 11-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2010285EN.01001501.xml

| 21.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/15

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

2010/C 285/07

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| | EPSO/AD/200/10 — Lawyers with English, Scottish or Northern Irish legal training |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/200/10 — Lawyers with English, Scottish or Northern Irish legal training

| | EPSO/AD/201/10 — Lawyers with Spanish legal training |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/201/10 — Lawyers with Spanish legal training

| | EPSO/AD/202/10 — Lawyers with French legal training |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/202/10 — Lawyers with French legal training

| | EPSO/AD/203/10 — Lawyers with Dutch legal training |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/203/10 — Lawyers with Dutch legal training

Administrators (AD 5) specialising in legal research

The competition notice is published in English, Spanish, French and Dutch only, in Official Journal C 285 A of 21 October 2010.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ABAD OSMAR,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv24/MCR/CJK

MARSHA NICHOLS, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the Court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff

commenced this civil rights action on January 18, 2011, by filing a complaint under

U.S.C. § 1983 and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docs. 1 & 2). On March

30, 2011, plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and assessed an

initial partial filing fee of $10.00. (Doc. 12). Plaintiff was given thirty (30) days in

which to pay the partial filing fee, and warned that failure to do so would result in a

recommendation that this case be dismissed. Thereafter, plaintiff was provided an

extension of time until May 25, 2011 in which to pay the partial filing fee. (Doc. 19). 

After plaintiff failed to comply by that date, the Court issued an order on June 13,

2011, requiring plaintiff to show cause, within fourteen (14) days, why this case

should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with an order of the court. (Doc.

Case 3:11-cv-00024-MCR-CJK Document 27 Filed 07/26/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

25). To date, plaintiff has neither responded to the order to show cause, paid the

initial partial filing fee, nor sought an extension of time.1

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this cause be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s

failure to comply with an order of the court.

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of July, 2011.

 

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Although plaintiff was transferred to a new correctional institution on June 29, 2011 (see doc. 1

26), that did not affect his receipt of the court’s show cause order, because the order issued well in

advance of the transfer. 

Case No: 3:11cv24/MCR/CJK

Case 3:11-cv-00024-MCR-CJK Document 27 Filed 07/26/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CHAD PAUL WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv535-RH/GRJ

LARRY CAMPBELL et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 7. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is DISMISSED

without prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on May 25, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00535-RH-GRJ Document 9 Filed 05/25/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009213EN.01001501.xml

| 8.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/15

---

Call for proposals under the 2010 work programme ‘People’ of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

2009/C 213/07

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the 2010 work programme ‘People’ of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call. Call deadline and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website.

‘People’ Specific Programme:

‘People’ Specific Programme:

Call Identifier: FP7-PEOPLE-2010-ITN

This call for proposals relates to the 2010 work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2009) 5892 of 29.7.2009.

Information on the modalities of the call, the work programme, and the guide for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cr-00043-MP

1:10-cr-00044-MP

ROBERT ALEXANDER KRASNOW,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 34 in 1:10-cr-43 and Doc. 29 in 1:10-cr-44. In

these motions, Mr. Krasnow asks to extend the time for responding to the Presentence

Investigative Report. The motions are granted, and Defendant shall have until April 1, 2011 to

respond to the PSI in each case. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of January, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# C_2010080EN.01000102.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/1

---

Taking of the oath by a new Member of the Court of Justice

2010/C 80/02

Following his appointment as Advocate General at the Court of Justice of the European Communities for the period from 30 November 2009 to 6 October 2015 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 30 November 2009, (1) Mr Cruz Villalón took the oath before the Court on 14 December 2009.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 14 of 20.1.2010, p.12.

1

---
fsea-ex42_264.htm



 

Exhibit 4.2

 

Description of First Seacoast Bancorp’s Securities Registered Under

Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

 

Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value Per Share

 

General.  First Seacoast Bancorp is authorized to issue 90,000,000 shares of common stock having a par value of $0.01 per share. Each share of First Seacoast Bancorp’s common stock has the same relative rights as, and is identical in all respects with, each other share of common stock. Upon payment of due consideration for shares of common stock, such shares are duly authorized, fully paid and nonassessable.

Distributions.  First Seacoast Bancorp can pay dividends if, as and when declared by its board of directors, subject to compliance with limitations which are imposed by law. The holders of common stock of First Seacoast Bancorp are entitled to receive and share equally in such dividends as may be declared by the board of directors of First Seacoast Bancorp out of funds legally available therefor.  Dividends from First Seacoast Bancorp depend, in large part, upon receipt of dividends from First Seacoast Bank. Regulations of the Federal Reserve Board and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency impose limitations on “capital distributions” by First Seacoast Bancorp and First Seacoast Bank, respectively.

Voting Rights. The holders of common stock of First Seacoast Bancorp possess exclusive voting rights in First Seacoast Bancorp.  Each holder of common stock is entitled to one vote per share and does not have any right to cumulate votes in the election of directors. If First Seacoast Bancorp issues preferred stock, holders of the preferred stock may also possess voting rights. 

Liquidation. In the event of any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of First Seacoast Bank, First Seacoast Bancorp, as the holder of all of First Seacoast Bank’s outstanding capital stock, would be entitled to receive, after payment or provision for payment of all debts and liabilities of First Seacoast Bank, including all deposit accounts and accrued interest thereon, all assets of First Seacoast Bank available for distribution.  In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of First Seacoast Bancorp, the holders of its common stock would be entitled to receive, after payment or provision for payment of all its debts and liabilities, all of the assets of First Seacoast Bancorp available for distribution.  If preferred stock is issued, the holders thereof may have a priority over the holders of the common stock in the event of liquidation or dissolution. 

Rights to Buy Additional Shares; Redemption.  Holders of the common stock of First Seacoast Bancorp are not entitled to preemptive rights with respect to any shares which may be issued.  Preemptive rights are the priority right to buy additional shares if First Seacoast Bancorp issues more shares in the future. The common stock is not subject to redemption.

{Clients/1578/00359270.DOCX/ }
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Labwire, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      December 23, 2008
            By: /s/ G. Dexter
      MorrisG.
      Dexter Morris, Principal Financial
Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Labwire, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Holdings, Inc.. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Terrence A. Tecco, Chief Executive Officer and, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Global Holdings, Inc.Date:  August 23, 2010
By:
/s/ Terrence A. TeccoTerrence A. TeccoPresident, CEO, CFO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

CASE NUMBER: 4:10cr54-RH

v.

PETE PALOMINO,

DEMETRIUS HARRIS

CLEMENT HOARDES,

SANCHEZ LEE,

CHRIS RANSOM,

TELLY THOMAS,

JAMAR BAILEY

 /

 

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER 

OR PRIOR SIMILAR ACTIONS

The United States of America, by Pamela C. Marsh, United States Attorney for

the Northern District of Florida, and the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, does

hereby notifies this Honorable Court, pursuant to Rule 5.1(G) of the Local Rules of the United

States District Court, Northern District of Florida, of the existence of a similar case which

concerns issues of law and facts common and identical with that of the above-captioned case but

which has been set for trial on a separate date. The other case is entitled United States v. Telly

THOMAS Case No. 4:10cr54-RH, which has been set for jury trial setting on Monday, June 6,

2011. The case involving the above captioned defendants involves facts and evidence which

arose from a common criminal investigation-in fact, the evidence which forms the basis for the

Case 4:10-cr-00054-RH-CAS Document 335 Filed 04/21/11 Page 1 of 3
instant case is largely identical save for specific information regarding the actions of each of

these defendants relative to the Title 21 conspiracy alleged in Count One. The other defendant

(THOMAS) was previously joined in Count One, but was then the subject of additional

substantive Counts in the fifth superseding indictment in this case number based on new criminal

conduct. Cases for the remaining defendants (except for PALOMINO and HOARDES, who

remain at large) are currently set for trial on May 2, 2011. The Government would asset that it

would be a more efficient use of Court time and resources to have these defendants tried in a

single hearing as opposed to relitigating identical issues in multiple hearings. It should further

be noted that it is likely, based upon current negotiations between defense counsel and the

Government that additional defendants may elect to enter a change of plea to the allegations

pending against them, as has been the case through the multiple superseding indictments in this

case.

WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully request this Honorable Court to grant the

requested relief.

Respectfully submitted,

PAMELA C. MARSH

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s Eric K. Mountin

ERIC K. MOUNTIN

Assistant United States Attorney

Northern District of Florida

Texas Bar Number 00784649

111 N. Adams St., 4th Floor

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(850) 942-8430

2

Case 4:10-cr-00054-RH-CAS Document 335 Filed 04/21/11 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing will be made available by electronic

case filing this 21st day of April, 2011, to all counsel(s) of record.

/s Eric K. Mountin

ERIC K. MOUNTIN

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 4:10-cr-00054-RH-CAS Document 335 Filed 04/21/11 Page 3 of 3