alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 23 (b)


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-37652, 333-64504, 333-64504-01, 333-64504-02, 333-71004, 333-71004-01,
333-71004-02, 333-84418, 333-84418-01, 333-84418-02, 333-110125 and Amendment
No. 1 thereto, and 333-103922 on Form S-3 of TXU Corp. and Registration
Statements Nos. 333-32833, 333-32837, 333-45657, 333-46671, 333-79627 as amended
by Post Effective Amendment No. 1 thereto, 333-62014, 333-86640, 333-92260 and
333-105133 on Form S-8 of TXU Corp. of our report dated March 11, 2004 (which
includes explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 and the rescission of Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue 98-10 as described in the Notes to the Financial Statements),
appearing in TXU Corp.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 11, 2004
Case 4:10-cv-00444-RH -WCS Document 8 Filed 10/25/10 Page 1 of 1
# C_2010254EN.01000201.xml

| 22.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5921 — Triton/Ovako Non-Wire-Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 254/03

On 17 September 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5921. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5921. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ARTHUR BLACK,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv391/LAC/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER, 

Respondent.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated August 26, 2011 (doc. 34). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 27) is GRANTED.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice as

untimely. 

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30 day of September, 2011. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00391-LC-EMT Document 36 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5174 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 613
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5174

                          [Report No. 115-793]

  To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with respect to 
  functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2018

 Mr. Walberg (for himself and Mr. Rush) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

                             June 28, 2018

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with respect to 
  functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Energy Emergency Leadership Act''.

SEC. 2. FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO ASSISTANT SECRETARIES.

    Subsection (a) of section 203 of the Department of Energy 
Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7133(a)) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new paragraph:
            ``(12) Energy emergency and energy security functions, 
        including--
                    ``(A) responsibilities with respect to 
                infrastructure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, 
                supply, and emergency planning, coordination, response, 
                and restoration; and
                    ``(B) upon request of a State, local, or tribal 
                government or energy sector entity, and in consultation 
                with other Federal agencies as appropriate, provision 
                of technical assistance, support, and response 
                capabilities with respect to energy security threats, 
                risks, and incidents.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 613

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5174

                          [Report No. 115-793]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with respect to 
  functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 28, 2018

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
Presidential Documents

68469 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 232 

Tuesday, December 4, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8208 of November 30, 2007 

National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

Accidents related to drunk and drugged driving claim the lives of thousands 

of Americans every year. During National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month we seek to raise awareness about the dangers of driving under 

the influence of alcohol or drugs and encourage citizens to drive responsibly. 

As a Nation, we must work together to prevent drunk and drugged driving 

on our roads. We can all play an important role by educating family members 

and friends about the devastating consequences of impaired driving and 

by insisting that they have a designated driver. Businesses, community organizations, and faith-based groups can promote substance abuse prevention 

and encourage alternative sources of transportation. By encouraging our 

fellow citizens to make responsible choices, we can help save lives. 

My Administration is dedicated to strengthening efforts against drunk and 

drugged driving. We have partnered with communities across America to 

increase public awareness about this serious crime and prevent impaired 

drivers from putting themselves and others at risk. Through high-visibility 

enforcement operations, the Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is helping discourage individuals from 

drinking and driving. To take drug-impaired drivers off the streets, the 

Office of National Drug Control Policy is working to give law enforcement 

officers the tools they need to detect when citizens are driving under the 

influence of drugs. 

During National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month and throughout the year, we are reminded of the importance of driving free from the 

influence of alcohol and drugs. By working together, we can make our 

Nation’s roadways safer for everyone. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim December 2007 as National 

Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month. I urge all Americans to 

make responsible decisions and take appropriate measures to prevent drunk 

and drugged driving. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PRESDOC

68470 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 4, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirtieth day 

of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtysecond. 

[FR Doc. 07–5951 

Filed 12–3–07; 11:08 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with PRESDOCGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CURTIS LEON DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00095-MP-GRJ

SADIE DARNELL, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Supplement. (Doc.

21.) Plaintiff requests permission to supplement his civil rights complaint by attaching

additional “legal documents” for the purpose of “more clearly establish[ing] and

reflect[ing] the entirety of [the] complaint and claims in this ... cause.

 Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d) provides that a party may file supplemental pleadings

when events occur after the date of the pleading to be supplemented. Plaintiff,

however, requests leave of court to attach documents which support the events already

described. For this purpose, Plaintiff must seek leave of court and file the proposed

amended pleading in its entirety with the motion. See N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 15.1. Plaintiff

requests 60 additional days to file this supplement. Thirty days is more than sufficient

time to complete and file an amended pleading. Plaintiff is directed to complete the

form complaint sent to him by the Clerk and mark it as the Second Amended

Complaint. Plaintiff may attach the supporting documents in his motion as exhibits to

the amended complaint. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
Page 2 of 2

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Supplement (Doc. 21) is GRANTED IN PART,

insofar as Plaintiff may have additional time to file a motion for leave to amend with the

attached proposed amended complaint. The motion is DENIED in all other respects.

2. The Clerk of Court shall mail to Plaintiff a form complaint for prisoners filing a

civil rights complaint and Plaintiff shall complete this form and file it no later than March

7, 2011. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 7 day of February, 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00095-MP-GRJ
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SIDNEY MARTS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv450/MCR/MD

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on December 20, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

3. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (doc. 12) and all other

pending motions are DENIED as moot.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of January, 2011.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### STATE v. GIBSON

No. 23.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 594.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 August 1972.
2011 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d
S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

9-29-2011 

# N a tl C it y M t g C o v

. B r i a n S t ephe n

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 09-1731

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2011

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a
U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2011 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a
U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du

. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" N a tl C it y M t g C o v

. B r i a n S t e p he n " (2011). 2011 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 416. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w

. v i l l a no v a

. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2011/416

### PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

No. 09

- 1731

________________
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE COMPANY, Appellant

v.

BRIAN STEPHEN; ELAINE K. STEPHEN

________________ Appeal from the Uni ted States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil Action No. 3

- 07

- cv

- 02070) District Judge: Honorable James M. Munley

________________ Argued January 5, 2011

Before: AMBRO and FISHER, Circuit Judges and SÁNCHEZ, * District Judge

(Opinion filed July 22, 2011 )

ORDER AMENDING PRECEDENTIAL OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge

IT IS NOW ORDERED that the published Opinion in the above case filed July 22 , 2011 , be amended as follows:

On page 3

, second full paragraph, line 1

, insert a comma after “2007”.

_________________

* 

### Honorable Juan R. Sánchez, District Court Judge, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.2 

### On page 5, footnote 5, line 4, replace “fall back” with “fallback”.

On p age 11, line 7, delete the comma after “categories”.

On page 13, first full paragraph, penultimate line, delete “jurisdiction over” and replace it with “the power to resolve”, so that the phrase reads “the Court had the power to resolve the ensuing contr oversy.”

On page 16, line 4 , replace “ agreed ” with “ contended ”.

On page 16, line 10, replace “problem” with “problems”.

By the Court,

/s/ Thomas L. Ambro, Circuit Judge

Dated: September 29, 2011
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 7, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), ASTM International (“ASTM”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of current, ongoing ASTM standards activities originating between May 2007 to September 2007 designed as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is available at                    *http://www.astm.org*.                

                    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 9, 2007. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 8, 2007 (72 FR 31856-01).                

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-5558 Filed 11-06-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# C_2009083EN.01001802.xml

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/18

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5232 — WPP/TNS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/06

On 23 September 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5232. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5232. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION 

DWIGHT J. PORTER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No.: 5:10-cv-206-RS-GRJ

 COLONEL BAXTER ,et al.,

Defendants. 

____________________________/ 

O R D E R

Plaintiff, a prisoner at Calhoun Correctional Institution, filed a third amended

complaint against six defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 25.) The Court

dismissed the claims against three defendants, Doc. 57, but the Plaintiff’s claims

against Defendants Lee, Dudley, and Baxter remain pending. On February 11, 2013,

the Court directed Defendants to submit a status report stating whether any additional

discovery was required prior to trial, in light of the fact that no motion for summary

judgment had been filed. (Doc. 66.) The Court directed Defendants to advise the Court

if no additional discovery was required, so that the matter could be set for trial. 

Defendants have submitted the required status report, and state that they do not

require any additional discovery.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Clerk is directed to refer this matter to District Judge Richard Smoak for

scheduling of trial in accordance with the Court’s schedule.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5 day of March 2013. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 Ma y 5, 2021

Order 

Clerk

May 5, 2021

162745(76)

SANDSTONE CREEK SOLAR, LLC, and 

GARY WALTERS, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

SC: 162745

v COA: 352910

Eaton CC: 2019-001256-CH

TOWNSHIP OF BENTON,

Defendant-Appellee.

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs-appellants to extend the time 

for filing their reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted 

on or before May 26, 2021.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 of Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the Report)
and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Graham Briggs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 23, 2014



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Graham Briggs                    
|    |  | Graham Briggs Chief Executive
Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.