alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 2 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 3 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 4 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 5 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 6 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 7 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 8 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 9 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 10 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 11 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 12 of 13Case 3:10-cv-00429-MCR -MD Document 8 Filed 12/02/10 Page 13 of 13
# EUR-Lex - - EN

*|*

#

**Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 1,25 % on 1 May 2011 — Euro exchange rates **

*
Official Journal C 133 , 04/05/2011 P. 0001 - 0001 *

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations [1]:

1,25 % on 1 May 2011

Euro exchange rates [2]

3 May 2011

2011/C 133/01

1 euro =

| Currency | Exchange rate |

USD | US dollar | 1,4780 |

JPY | Japanese yen | 119,36 |

DKK | Danish krone | 7,4568 |

GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89695 |

SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9581 |

CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2780 |

ISK | Iceland króna | |

NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7995 |

BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |

CZK | Czech koruna | 24,172 |

HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,53 |

LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |

LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |

PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9443 |

RON | Romanian leu | 4,1080 |

TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2642 |

AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3604 |

CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4096 |

HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4814 |

NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8468 |

SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8156 |

KRW | South Korean won | 1583,78 |

ZAR | South African rand | 9,8038 |

CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6024 |

HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3804 |

IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12640,85 |

MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3978 |

PHP | Philippine peso | 63,415 |

RUB | Russian rouble | 40,4700 |

THB | Thai baht | 44,340 |

BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3533 |

MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1090 |

INR | Indian rupee | 65,7970 |

[1] Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

[2] Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 10.131


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE AND 


WARRANT PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to the Convertible
Promissory Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”), dated as of July 9, 2014, between VG Life Sciences Inc.
(the “Company”) and Wild Harp Holdings, LLC (“Investor”) is made and entered effective as of the August
14, 2014.


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Investor
deem it necessary to remove reference to 50,000 shares of Series B Preferred Shares and a related section; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto
deem it necessary and desirable to amend the Agreement pursuant to the terms of Section 1.1(c) and Section 4.3(iii-v) of the Agreement;
and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Investor
have decided to amend the Agreement in certain respects as set forth below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of
the agreements contained herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto do hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


 


1. The last sentence of Section 1.1(c)
is to be removed in its entirety to read:


 


(c) it will not be prepayable by
VGLS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Investor may convert all or any portion of the Notes, solely at the option of the Investor,
except that the lock up restrictions remain in effect. The maturity date for all notes shall be July 9, 2016.


 


2. Subsections 4.3 (iii), 4.3 (iv), and 4.3
(v) are to be removed in their entirety to read:


 


4.3 Board Actions. The Company
shall have delivered to the Investor resolutions duly adopted by the Company's Board of Directors and, to the extent required by
applicable law or by the Company's Articles of Incorporation, the Company's Shareholders, and certified by the Secretary of the
Company (i) approving and authorizing the Company's execution and delivery of this Agreement, the Notes and the Warrants,
and the Company's performance thereunder, and (ii) authorizing the reservation of a sufficient number of shares of the Company's
Common Stock to permit the conversion of the Notes and to permit the exercise of the Warrants.


 


 


Acknowledged and agreed:


 


 


VG Life Sciences Inc.


 


 


/s/ Haig Keledjian


By: Haig Keledjian


Title: Chairman


 


Wild Harp Holdings, LLC


 


 


/s/ John Tynan


By: John Tynan


Title: Managing Member
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

AVERY SOUFFRANT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv448-RH/WCS

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER

D. POPE et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER FOR TRANSFER

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 9. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida, Jacksonville Division. The clerk must take all steps necessary

to effect the transfer.

SO ORDERED on January 19, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WILNER VAL SAINT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00104-SPM -GRJ

FEDERAL BUREAU OF 

PRISONS,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Plaintiff has responded to the Court’s Order to Show Cause (Doc. 9) and

represents that he gave his amended complaint with service copies to prison officials at

Coleman Federal Correctional Institution to be mailed on November 24, 2010. Plaintiff,

however, mistakenly mailed the amended complaint to Ocala, Florida, because he “is

familiar with Magistrate Gary R. Jones being located in Ocala, Florida....” (Doc. 12). 

Accordingly, because the amended complaint and copies have now been forwarded to

this Court and filed on the docket (Doc. 10) the Court will accept them and review the

amended complaint. All future filings in this case should be mailed to the Clerk’s Office

in Gainesville, Florida where the undersigned is assigned as a United States Magistrate

Judge. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 16 day of December 2010. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
Exhibit 32(i)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,



|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





|/s/ Haley R. FisackerlyHaley R. Fisackerly
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive
Officer of Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	August 7, 2008
# C_2011122EN.01000701.xml

| 20.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 April 2011

2011/C 122/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4302 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4576 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87800 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9210 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2842 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7635 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,125 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,88 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9785 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0885 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1936 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3622 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3694 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1240 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8154 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7835 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 557,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7827 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3399 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3580 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 422,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3271 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,973 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,4869 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,992 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2647 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7398 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,6220 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4302

JPY

Japanese yen

118,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4576

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87800

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9210

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2842

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7635

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,125

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,88

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9785

RON

Romanian leu

4,0885

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1936

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3622

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3694

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1240

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8154

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7835

KRW

South Korean won

1 557,28

ZAR

South African rand

9,7827

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3399

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3580

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 422,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3271

PHP

Philippine peso

61,973

RUB

Russian rouble

40,4869

THB

Thai baht

42,992

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2647

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7398

INR

Indian rupee

63,6220

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:01cr78-001LAC

KATRINA JOHNSON

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on February 4, 2008

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE BASED ON 

RETROACTIVE GUIDELINE AMENDMENT, EFFECTIVE MARCH 03, 2008, 

CONCERNING COCAINE BASE (“CRACK”) THAT HAVE THE EFFECT OF LOWERING 

GUIDELINE RANGE 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 2/4/2008 Doc.# 177

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 5th day of

February, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Without prejudice. The retroactive application does not become effective

until 3 March 2008. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:01-cr-00078-MCR Document 179 Filed 02/05/08 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Soy Energy, LLC (the
Company) for the quarter ended April 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dallas Thompson,
Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

| |                                
| | -------------------------------
| | /s/ Dallas
 Thompson           
| |                                
| | Dallas
 Thompson, Treasurer and
| | Chief
 Financial Officer       
| |                                
| | Dated: June
 15, 2009          

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 17, 2011 

y0614 

Order 

 

June 17, 2011 

142808 & (52)(55) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142808 

 COA: 297679 

Branch CC: 09-059264-FC 

THOMAS WEIR FOLEY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2011 judgment of the Court of 

Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED as moot.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Laufer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Carol Laufer Carol Laufer Title: Chief Financial Officer   August 1, 2008
# C_2011174EN.01000501.xml

| 15.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6104 — Safran/SNPE Matériaux Energétiques/Regulus)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 174/03

On 30 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6104. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6104. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:10cr39-SPM-GRJ

STEPHEN TODD NELSON,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY PLEA

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to

the Court’s consideration of any Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

11(e)(2), the plea of guilty of the defendant, STEPHEN TODD NELSON, to

Count One of the indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear

before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of October, 2010. 

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 5:10cv283-RH/CJK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MATTHEW LEE FOSTER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv283-RH/CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY’S FEES

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s second report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 24. No objections have been filed. Upon 

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED. The plaintiff’s motion for 

attorney’s fees, ECF No. 21, is GRANTED. The Secretary must pay $2,968.75 as 

attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act.

SO ORDERED on August 14, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00283-RH-CJK Document 25 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TERRY FOREHAND,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv247/RS-EMT

N. ROBINSON, AW Programs;

R. KOWALCZYK, Head Chaplain; and

L. LAND, Chaplain for Jewish Inmates,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 5). No

objections have been filed.

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice because of plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on December 13, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Genesis Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert T. Brooke,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  /s/
      Robert T. BrookeRobert
      T. BrookeChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)August
      16, 2010
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT L. MILHOUSE,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:11cv107-WS

HERMAN ATKINS JR.,

Defendant.

 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER

Before the court is the plaintiff's motion to reconsider the magistrate judge's

report and recommendation docketed October 8, 2013. Because the plaintiff's

motion was referred to the undersigned after the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation was adopted and judgment was entered, the court will treat the

motion to reconsider as a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. 

The court has now reviewed the plaintiff's motion and has determined that

the plaintiff has failed to establish a basis for relief under Rule 60(b).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The plaintiff's motion to reconsider (doc. 22) is DENIED. 
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of January , 2014.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Opinion issued February 3, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-14-00211-CV

———————————

CROWN COMMUNICATION LLC D/B/A CROWN COMM LLC, 

Appellant

V.

T10 UNISON SITE MANAGEMENT LLC AND

THE ESTATE OF CHARLOTTE MCGREW, Appellees

On Appeal from the 25th District Court

Colorado County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 23350

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Crown Communication LLC, has filed a motion to dismiss this 

appeal. More than ten days have elapsed since the filing of the motion, and no 

party has objected to dismissal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a). No opinion has issued 
2

in this appeal. Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBT 23.1



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-24595 registering 6,313,432 shares of common stock pursuant to
the Employee Stock Purchase and Savings Plan, Employee Stock Option Plan,
Revised and Amended 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreement and Restricted Stock Agreement and Form S-8 No. 333-41979 registering
1,500,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the 1997 Non-Officer Stock Option
Plan) of EEX Corporation of our report dated February 13, 1998, with respect to
the consolidated financial statements of EEX Corporation included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                    ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Houston, Texas
March 17, 1998
=================================================================
Household Finance Corporation
Household Revolving Home Equity Loan Trust 1996-2
Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates - Series 1996-2
P & S Agreement Date:              November 1, 1996
Original Settlement Date:           November 26, 1996
Series Number of Class A-1 Certificates:     441919AK3
Original Sale Balance:             $776,373,000
================================================================= 
                                             Total   1996 (1)
                                                  12/20/96
                                           Distribution Date

Total Investor Distribution                    $6,835,868.73

Investor Interest Distribution Class A-1       $2,854,464.73

Investor Principal Distribution Class A-1      $3,981,404.00


(1) These amounts represent cash distributions paid by the trust
during the 1996 calendar year.  As such, they do not represent
the economic accrual of interest for tax purposes.