alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JOSEPH N ZACHAROW,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00138-MP-AK

MONICA E DE LA CRUZ, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the filing of a complaint against persons residing in

Miami, Florida, and concerning the issuance of a parking ticket in Dade County, Florida. (Doc.

1). The proper forum for this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) is where any defendant

resides or where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred. Thus, this

case should be brought in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida,

Miami Division. 28 U.S.C. § 89(c). 

A federal district court has the authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to transfer a case to

another district or division "in which it could have been brought." A court may raise the issue of

defective venue sua sponte, but should not dismiss an improperly filed case for lack of venue

without giving the parties an opportunity to respond. Lipofsky v. New York State Workers

Comp. Bd., 861 F.2d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 1988). The Lipofsky court did not place the same
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:10-cv-00138-MP-AK

limitations on the court's ability to transfer a case to the appropriate forum pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1404(a). See Lipofsky, 861 F.2d at 1259, n. 2. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

This case is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Florida, Miami Division. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of July, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SHARON FOWLER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv149/RS-EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner

of Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 6). No

objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion To Dismiss Complaint (Doc. 5) is granted. This case is

dismissed.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on September 7, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                            |  |  |  |
| NAME OF SUBIDIARY                          | PERCENTAGE HELD | COUNTRY OF INCORPORATION |
| Freegold (Harmony) Proprietary Limited     | 100 | % | South Africa |
| Avgold Limited                             | 100 | % | South Africa |
| Harmony Gold Australia Proprietary Limited | 100 | % | Australia |
| Kalahari Goldridge Mining Company Limited  | 100 | % | South Africa |
| Randfontein Estates Limited                | 100 | % | South Africa |
| African Rainbow Minerals Gold Limited      | 100 | % | South Africa |
# C_2010346EN.01000201.xml

| 18.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/2

---

Taking of the oath by a new Member of the General Court

2010/C 346/02

Following his appointment as a Judge at the General Court of the European Union for the period from 26 November 2010 to 31 August 2016 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 18 November 2010, (1) Mr Andrei Popescu took the oath before the Court of Justice on 26 November 2010.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 306 of 23.11.2010, p. 76.

1

---
Exhibit 23.2               Consent of Malone & Bailey, PLLC
                           Independent Public Accountants


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-110309) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-109481,
333-106074, and 333-97913) of Eagle Broadband, Inc., of our report dated
December 15, 2003, relating to the financial statements, which appear in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

/s/ Malone & Bailey, PLLC
-------------------------
Malone & Bailey, PLLC
Houston, Texas
June 1, 2004
January 22, 2015

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 22nd day of January, 2015.

10-14-00321-CV	IN THE INTEREST OF H.J.Y.S., A CHILD - ON APPEAL FROM THE 361ST DISTRICT COURT OF BRAZOS COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. 12-003150-CV-361 – DISMISSED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

“This cause came on to be heard on the motions of co-appellants, the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services and Frederica Antonio Yax-Sic, to dismiss this appeal, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of the Court said motions should be granted; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that said motions be, and hereby are, granted.  It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that this appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed.  It is further ordered that appellants pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATIONS I, Boyd V. Applegate, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Porfavor, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  November 11, 2008     By: /s/ Boyd V. Applegate Boyd V. Applegate CEO, President, Director
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 D0 50 7 . J EFFREY NELSON v . THE STATE.

Th e St at e fi l ed a n o t i ce o f ap p eal fro m a t ri al co urt o rd er g ran t i n g J effrey
Nel s o n ’ s m o ti o n t o d is m i s s hi s Fu l t o n Co un t y St at e Co u rt cri m i n al cas e. Th e cas e h as b een d o ck et ed i n t h i s Co u rt as Cas e No

. A 1 8 A1 7 5 0. W h en Nel s o n at t em p t ed t o fi l e h i s A p pel l ee’ s Bri ef in A1 8 A 1 7 5 0
, t h e b ri ef was i n ad v ert en t l y d o ck et ed as a d i s cre tiona

r y a pplic a tion an d as s es s ed Ap p l i cat i o n No

. A1 8 D0 5 0 7

. Becau s e it i s cl ear fro m t h e fi l in gs t h at N el s o n i n t e n d e d t o fi le hi s res p o n s i v e b ri ef rat h er t h an a d i s cret i o n ary

ap pl i cat io n, Ap p li cat i o n No

. A1 8D0 50 7 i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. June 29, 2018

06/29/2018
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CURTIS REED,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv497-SPM/WCS

MATTHEW ROWAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This civil rights action, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was initiated on

November 9, 2010, Docs. 1-2. The amended complaint was filed on November

18, 2010, doc. 5, and Defendant Rowan filed an answer, doc. 6, on February 3,

2011. Defendant Gadsden County Sheriff's Office filed a motion to dismiss the

amended complaint on February 3, 2011, doc. 7. Another motion to dismiss was

filed by Defendant Morris Young, doc. 8, on the same day, along with a motion to

dismiss filed separately by Defendants Douglas Croley, Gadsden County,

Gadsden County Board of Commissioners, Eugene Lamb, Jr., and Gene

Morgan, doc. 9. 

Case 4:10-cv-00497-WS-CAS Document 15 Filed 05/16/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, has filed a response, doc. 12, to the first

motion (doc. 7) filed by the Gadsden County Sheriff's Office, and a separate response,

doc. 13, to the second motion (doc. 8), filed by Defendant Morris Young. Another

response was filed by Plaintiff, doc. 14, to the first motion to dismiss, (doc. 7), and that

response is deemed to amend the first response, doc. 12, which in reality, was not a

response at all. This order is entered to also advise Plaintiff that if Plaintiff had intended

to file three responses to the three separate motions to dismiss, that was not

accomplished. No response has been received to the motion to dismiss filed by

Defendants Douglas Croley, Gadsden County, Gadsden County Board of

Commissioners, Eugene Lamb, Jr., and Gene Morgan, doc. 9. Plaintiff shall have until

May 31, 2011, to file a response to that motion. 

The motions to dismiss, docs. 7 and 8, to which responses have been filed shall

be addressed in due course. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff shall have until May 31, 2011, to file a response to the motion to

dismiss, doc. 9, filed by Defendants Douglas Croley, Gadsden County, Gadsden County

Board of Commissioners, Eugene Lamb, Jr., and Gene Morgan. 

2. The Clerk of Court shall refer this file to me upon Plaintiff's filing of the

response to the motion to dismiss or no later than May 31, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of May, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

Case No. 4:10cv497-SPM/WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00497-WS-CAS Document 15 Filed 05/16/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

CASE NUMBER: 4:10cr54-RH

v.

PETE PALOMINO,

DEMETRIUS HARRIS

CLEMENT HOARDES,

TELLY THOMAS,

JAMAR BAILEY

 /

 

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER 

OR PRIOR SIMILAR ACTIONS

The United States of America, by Pamela C. Marsh, United States Attorney for

the Northern District of Florida, and the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, does

hereby notifies this Honorable Court, pursuant to Rule 5.1(G) of the Local Rules of the United

States District Court, Northern District of Florida, of the existence of a similar case which

concerns issues of law and facts common and identical with that of the above-captioned case. 

The other case is entitled United States v. Sanchez LEE, Case No. 4:10cr54-RH, which is

currently pending a jury trial setting for Monday, May 2, 2011. The case involving the above

captioned defendants involves facts and evidence which arose from a common criminal

investigation-in fact, the evidence which forms the basis for the instant case is largely identical

save for specific information regarding the actions of these defendants relative to the Title 21

conspiracy alleged in Count One. The other defendant (LEE) was positively identified and

linked to the conspiracy several months after the indictment of these conspirators, whose case is

currently set for trial on April 4, 2011. The Government would assert that it would be a more

Case 4:10-cr-00054-RH-CAS Document 271 Filed 03/09/11 Page 1 of 2
efficient use of Court time and resources to have these defendants tried in a single hearing as

opposed to relitigating the same issues in multiple hearings. There is also the possibility that

additional defendants may elect to enter a change of plea to the allegations pending against them,

as has been the case through the multiple superseding indictments in this case.

WHEREFORE, the United States respectfully request this Honorable Court to grant the

requested relief.

Respectfully submitted,

PAMELA C. MARSH

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s Eric K. Mountin

ERIC K. MOUNTIN

Assistant United States Attorney

Northern District of Florida

Texas Bar Number 00784649

111 N. Adams St., 4th Floor

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(850) 942-8430

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing was filed via the CM/ECF electronic case filing

system on this 9th day of March, 2011, and all registered counsel of record will be notified

electronically.

/s Eric K. Mountin

ERIC K. MOUNTIN

Assistant United States Attorney 

Case 4:10-cr-00054-RH-CAS Document 271 Filed 03/09/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011006EN.01000401.xml

| 11.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 January 2011

2011/C 6/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2903 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 107,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4494 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83180 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9205 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2459 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7085 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,648 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 280,42 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7006 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9047 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2638 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0524 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3037 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2850 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0340 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7011 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6802 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 459,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,8717 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5646 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4023 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 738,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9748 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,308 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,6750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,650 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,1818 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,8223 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 58,7540 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2903

JPY

Japanese yen

107,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4494

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83180

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9205

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2459

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7085

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,648

HUF

Hungarian forint

280,42

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7006

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9047

RON

Romanian leu

4,2638

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0524

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3037

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2850

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0340

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7011

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6802

KRW

South Korean won

1 459,30

ZAR

South African rand

8,8717

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5646

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4023

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 738,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9748

PHP

Philippine peso

57,308

RUB

Russian rouble

39,6750

THB

Thai baht

39,650

BRL

Brazilian real

2,1818

MXN

Mexican peso

15,8223

INR

Indian rupee

58,7540

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eagle Broadband, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David Weisman, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  July 29, 2004

/s/ David A. Weisman
David A. Weisman,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1 - Principal Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Your Event, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering
this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the
quarter ended February 28, 2011 and filed with the U. S. Securities and
Exchange Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


   /s/ Marilyn Montgomery
----------------------------------
       Marilyn Montgomery
Its:   Principal Executive Officer
       Principal Financial Officer

Date  May 9, 2011
      -----------


<PAGE>
# C_2010297EN.01000301.xml

| 3.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/3

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

2010/C 297/03

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| — | EPSO/AST/105/10 — Language editors with Greek as their main language (EL) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/105/10 — Language editors with Greek as their main language (EL)

| — | EPSO/AST/106/10 — Language editors with Spanish as their main language (ES) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/106/10 — Language editors with Spanish as their main language (ES)

| — | EPSO/AST/107/10 — Language editors with Dutch as their main language (NL) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/107/10 — Language editors with Dutch as their main language (NL)

| — | EPSO/AST/108/10 — Language editors with Portuguese as their main language (PT) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AST/108/10 — Language editors with Portuguese as their main language (PT)

Assistants (AST 3) for preparing and checking the linguistic quality of texts for the Reports of Cases before the Court of Justice.

The competition notice is published in Greek, Spanish, Dutch and Portuguese only, in Official Journal C 297 A of 3 November 2010.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

M&M Elevator Company, Ltd., * From the 244 th District

Court of Ector County,

Trial Court No. C

- 128,532

.

Vs. No. 11

- 13

- 00035

- CV * September 26, 2013

Eliazar Trevino, Jr., individually and as * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

n ext friend of Eliazar Trevino, III, (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
Lailyana Trevin o, and Urijah Trevino, McCall, J., and Willson , J.)

This court has considered M&M Elevator Company, Ltd. ’s unopposed motion

to dismiss this appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore,

in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred

by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring the same.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40592

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAFAEL SANTOS GALAN-CASTRO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13-CR-1014-1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rafael Santos 

Galan-Castro has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Galan-Castro has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-40592 Document: 00513079627 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
No. 14-40592

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-40592 Document: 00513079627 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

Subsidiaries of Autobytel Inc. 

 

Autobytel Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

 

Auto-By-Tel Acceptance Corporation, a Delaware corporation 

 

Auto-By-Tel Insurance Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation

 

e~autosdirect.com inc., a Delawarecorporation, doing business as “autobyteldirect.com” 

 

Autoweb.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

 

A.I.N. Corporation, a California corporation, doing business as “CarSmart.com” 

 

Autobytel Information Services Inc., a Delaware corporation 

 

Autobytel Acquisition Corp., a California corporation 

 

AVV, Inc., a Delaware corporation 

 

Retention Performance Marketing, Inc., a Delawarecorporation 

 

Car.com, Inc., a Delawarecorporation 

 

Autobytel Columbia Corp., aDelaware corporation 

 

Stoneage FinancialCorporation, a Michigan corporation