alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 28 (Monday, February 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6577-6578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1933--International Electronics Manufacturing 
Initiative (Formerly National Electronics Manufacturing Initiative)

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 27, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), International Electronics 
Manufacturing Initiative (formerly National Electronics Manufacturing 
Initiative) (``iNEMI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Comission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Albemarle Corporation, Baton Rouge, LA; Analogic, 
Peabody, MA; Ciba Speciality Chemicals Corporation, Tarrytown, PA; 
Micro Systems Engineering, Inc. (MSEI), Lake Oswego, OR; Rambo 
Chemicals (HK) Ltd., Kwai Chung, Hong Kong-China;

[[Page 6578]]

STATS ChipPAC Ltd., Singapore, Singapore; Supresta, Ardsley, NY; and 
UGS Corporation, Milford, OH have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    Also, Heraeus, Inc., West Conshohocken, PA; Total Parts Plus, Fort 
Walton Beach, FL; and Nortel, Toronto, Ontario, CANADA have withdrawn 
as parties to this venture. In addition, Alcatel and Lucent 
Technologies have merged with the name of the combined companies 
changed to Alcatel-Lucent, Paris, France.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and iNEMI intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 6, 1996, iNEMI filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 28, 
1996 (61 FR 33774).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 5, 
2006. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on February 8, 2006 (71 FR 6522).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-604 Filed 2-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MARY YOUNG,

Plaintiff,

vs. 5:10cv265/SPM/MD

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of the Social Security

Administration,

Defendant.

______________________________________________________________________ 

 

O R D E R

Plaintiff has filed a complaint for judicial review of an adverse administrative

decision of the defendant and has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc.

3). It affirmatively appears that leave to proceed in forma pauperis should be

granted. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 3) is granted and this case

may be filed and the pleadings may be served without the prepayment of costs to the

plaintiff as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

2. The clerk of court is directed to send three certified copies of this order,

the service copies of the complaint, the summons, and the prepared USM 285 forms

to the United States Marshal.

3. The United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint and

summons upon Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, the Attorney

General of the United States by certified mail, and the office of the United States 
Page 2 of 2

Attorney for this District by regular mail or by hand delivery. All costs of service

shall be advanced by the United States.

4. After a response to the complaint has been filed by the defendant, the

plaintiff shall be required to mail to the attorney for the defendant a copy of every

pleading or other paper, including letters, submitted for consideration by the court. 

The plaintiff shall include with the original paper to be filed with the clerk of court

a certificate stating the date a correct copy of the paper was mailed to each

defendant or to the attorney representing each defendant. Any paper submitted for

filing after a response to the complaint has been filed by the defendant which does

not contain a certificate of service shall be returned by the clerk and disregarded by

the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19 day of October, 2010. th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 5:10cv265/SPM/MD
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7286

ANTHONY FRED MARTIN,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

SUSAN DUFFY,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. 

(4:15-cv-02104-DCN)

Submitted: November 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Fred Martin, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Fred Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation 

and dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) 

civil rights action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because the deficiencies 

identified by the district court may be remedied by the filing 

of an amended complaint, we conclude that the order Martin seeks 

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar 

Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of 

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Cardiovascular Program Project.                    

*Date:*                         January 23, 2008.                    

*Time:*                         2:30 p.m. to  4:40 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Holly Patton, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7188, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0280,                         *pattonh@nhlbi.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 29, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5970 Filed 12-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MATTHEW LEE FOSTER,

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 5:10cv283/RH/CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court upon plaintiff’s application for attorney’s fees

(doc. 21), filed pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. §

2412(d), and defendant’s response (doc. 22). Plaintiff’s counsel requested

reimbursement in the amount of $2,968.75 under the EAJA. (Doc. 21, p. 1). 

Plaintiff’s counsel filed a time itemization accounting that shows 23.75 hours as the

total time spent representing plaintiff in this court. (Doc. 21-2). In its response,

defendant did not oppose the application for attorney’s fees and requested that the

court award fees under the EAJA in the amount of $2,968.75. (Doc. 22, p. 1). The

court concludes that an award of attorney’s fees is justified under the EAJA, in light

of the Commissioner’s agreement.

The Commissioner asks that the fee be distributed in accordance with Astrue

v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010), but does not directly allege or show that plaintiff

owes a debt to the United States. Although Ratliff applies, the fee should be “paid

directly to counsel aslong asthe Government is afforded an opportunity to offset any

Case 5:10-cv-00283-RH-CJK Document 24 Filed 07/12/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

preexisting debt owed by the plaintiff . . . .” Meyer v. Astrue, Civ. No. 09–3205

(MJD/LIB), 2011 WL 4036398, at *3 (D. Minn. Aug. 25, 2011).

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That the application for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act

(doc. 21) be GRANTED in the amount of $2,968.75, and the Commissioner be

ordered to pay that amount to plaintiff’s counsel. The Commissioner will follow

Astrue v. Ratliff, but must make prompt payment of the amount due, as no showing

of an outstanding federal debt has been made to date.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 12th day of July, 2012.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITEDSTATESMAGISTRATEJUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within fourteen days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that

may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon the magistrate judge and all

other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual

findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 5:10cv283/RH/CJK

Case 5:10-cv-00283-RH-CJK Document 24 Filed 07/12/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LINDA F. McNEILL,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv371/RV/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of the 

Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated November 1, 2011 (doc. 17). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, this action is DISMISSED, and

the clerk is directed to close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of November, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00371-RV-EMT Document 18 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 249 (Monday, December 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74288-74289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL


Appraisal Subcommittee; Information Collection Submitted for OMB 
Review and Comment Request

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee, Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial 
Institutions Examination Council (``ASC'') will submit to the Office of 
Management and Budget (``OMB'') for clearance the following information 
collection, without change from a previously approved collection.

DATES: Comments on this information collection must be received on or 
before January 30, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Marc L. Weinberg, Acting Executive Director 
and General Counsel, Appraisal Subcommittee, 2000 K Street, NW., Suite 
310, Washington, DC 20006; and Mark D. Menchik, Clearance Officer, 
Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Rom 
10236, Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marc L. Weinberg, Acting Executive 
Director and General Counsel, Appraisal Subcommittee, 2000 K Street, 
NW., Suite 310, Washington, DC 20006, from whom copies of the 
information collection and supporting documents are available.

Summary of Revision

    Title: Temporary Waiver Requests, Rules 1102.1 through 1102.7, 12 
CFR part 1102, subpart A.
    Type of Review: Regular submission.
    Description: The information will be used by the ASC and its staff 
Requests

[[Page 74289]]

for temporary waiver relief under Sec. 1119(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
12 U.S.C. 3348(b)).
    Form Number: None.
    OMB Number: 3139-0003.
    Affected Public: Individuals and households.
    Number of Respondents: 1 respondent.
    Total Annual Responses: 1 response.
    Average Hours per Response: 3 hours.
    Total Annual Burden Hours: 3 hours.

    By the Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial 
Institutions Examination Council.

    Dated: December 21, 2007.
Marc L. Weinberg,
Acting Executive Director & General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-6237 Filed 12-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CECIL EUGENE BOYKIN, JR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-1-MP-GRJ

LEVY COUNTY JAIL, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On March 28, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause on or before April

8, 2011, as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the

Court’s order to pay the filing fee or move for leave to proceed as a pauper. Doc. 5. As

of the date of this order, Plaintiff has failed to respond to the show cause order. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed for

failure to comply with an order of the Court and for failure to prosecute. 

IN CHAMBERS, at Gainesville, Florida, this 12 day of April 2011.

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RYAN THOMAS GREEN,

Petitioner,

v. Case No.: 3:10cv418/MCR/MD

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated November 17, 2011. The petitioner has been furnished a

copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and the court

has made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, the court concludes that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 23) is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to dismiss (doc. 22) is GRANTED.

3. The petition (doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2012.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY ROGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00418-MCR-MD Document 27 Filed 01/04/12 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CONNIE FRANCES WHIGUM,

 a/k/a Saint Connie Frances Garrison 

 Beck Slack/Slak White Whigum,

 a/k/a Connie Whigum Hamilton,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv442/MCR/MD

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes onfor consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated November 3, 2010. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED with prejudice.

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.
Page 2 of 2

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of November, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:10cv442/MCR/MD
Slip Op. 04-63 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE BEFORE: RICHARD W. GOLDBERG, SENIOR JUDGE

SLATER STEELS CORP., FORT WAYNE SPECIALITY ALLOYS DIVISION; CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP., CRUCIBLE SPECIALTY METALS DIVISION, CRUCIBLE MATERIALS CORP.; ELECTRALLOY CORP.; UNITED STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO/CLC; ACCIAIERIE VALBRUNA S.P.A.,

Plaintiffs,

v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and TRAFILERIE BEDINI, SRL, Defendant- Intervenor. Consolidated Court No. 02-00189

JUDGMENT ORDER Upon consideration of the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to United States Court of International Trade Remand Order (“ Redetermination Results ”) filed by the Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) pursuant to the Court’s decision in Slater Steels Corp. v. United States , Slip Op. 03-162 (Dec. 16, 2003), and upon the parties’ comments regarding the Redetermination Results ; upon all other papers filed herein, and upon due deliberation; the Court finds that Commerce adequately distinguished the five administrative determinations cited in the Court’s remand instructions. Accordingly, it is herebyORDERED that the Redetermination Results are sustained in

all respects; and it is further ORDERED that judgment is entered for defendant. SO ORDERED. /s/ Richard W. Goldberg Richard W. Goldberg Senior Judge Date: June 9, 2004

New York, New York