alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MITCHEL MACHADO,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv530-MP/WCS

IMMIGRATION AND 

CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT,

Respondent.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk.

In an order filed February 16, 2011, Petitioner was directed to file an amended

petition and to either pay the filing fee or submit an IFP motion by March 17, 2011. 

Petitioner was also warned of dismissal if he failed to comply with that order. Doc. 6. 

To date, no response has been received from the Petitioner. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734

(1962). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for 
Page 2 of 2

failure to obey a court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited

(11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Petitioner has failed to comply

with an order or to prosecute this case, this petition should now be dismissed

without prejudice. 

Petitioner shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Petitioner a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by

filing a motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on April 1, 2011.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

4:10cv530-MP/WCS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72999-73004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6150]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 08-29]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-29 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.


[[Page 73000]]


    Dated: December 18, 2007
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-01-M

[[Page 73001]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE07.033


[[Page 73002]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE07.034


[[Page 73003]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE07.035


[[Page 73004]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN26DE07.037

[FR Doc. 07-6150 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
# C_2011092EN.01001101.xml

| 24.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 March 2011

2011/C 92/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4136 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,42 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4573 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86990 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9310 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2746 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8910 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,417 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7088 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0410 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1165 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2022 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4006 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3890 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0186 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9096 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7884 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 590,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7796 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2633 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3830 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 312,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2814 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,345 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0325 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,804 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3517 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9646 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,3930 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4136

JPY

Japanese yen

114,42

DKK

Danish krone

7,4573

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86990

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9310

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2746

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8910

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,417

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7088

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0410

RON

Romanian leu

4,1165

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2022

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4006

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3890

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0186

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9096

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7884

KRW

South Korean won

1 590,46

ZAR

South African rand

9,7796

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2633

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3830

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 312,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2814

PHP

Philippine peso

61,345

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0325

THB

Thai baht

42,804

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3517

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9646

INR

Indian rupee

63,3930

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
_.,.

HonCTom F. Coleman, Jr. County‘Att6mey Angellna Cdurity Lufkln, Texas Dear Sir; O@l.ni@i’No. -O-327- - Re: IMPease Pndeputy 1 s-salary &id PppPoval by auditor -where not provided for in budget.

Weacknowledge receipt of your letter of February 9th andwl,sh to thank you for the enclosure thereto attached.

Originally, you submitted two questions for our oplnion but we note from the letter -and copy of an order .of the Commissioners Court attached that the question of the newEc$- missioners’ Court’s refusal to approve the raise in iala the chief deputy county clerk voted to begin January 1, 1 39 7 andmadeby order prior thereto, has become moot in that s&Id salary increase appears to have been approved and acted upotr.

Ro doubt, the questlon still has abearing on the matter nowup for consideration in your county andwhich we belleve is covered by the following question taken ‘from the facts submlttedr

Where the Commissioners’ Court votes an approval of, or raises the salary of the county clerk* s chief deputy in January Andy refuses to change the budget to take care of this increase In salary,~should the county .auditor refuse.to issue awarrant to cover same?” Werespectfully call your attentlon to an opinion, No. C-07, written by this Department dated January 6, 1939, and addressed to Hon. J. D. Looney, bounty Auditor, Boston, Texas, a copy of which is hereto attached.

In view of the above opinions as it might apply to your problem, it is the opinion of this Department that only In cases where the finances of the county clearly will not permit and the auditor has legal grounds uponwhich to base his refusal to pay such,lncrease voted in a deputy’s salaryHon. TomF. Coleman, Jr., page 2 (C-327)

outside the limits as fixed in the budget would the auditor be authorized to refuse such payment. Very truly yours ATTORNEY

GENISRRAL

OFTEXAS By /s/ Wm.J. R. King Wm.J. R. King, Assistant WmKrAWtwb

APPROWD: /s/ Gerald C. Mann ATTORHMGENERALOF TEXAS

F
### IN THE COURT OF APP EALS OF TENNESS EE AT KNOXVI LLE June 11, 200 9 S es sio n NANCY RA NDOLPH DEAK INS v . LYNN LAMPTON DEAKI NS

Appeal from t he Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 06D1225 W. Jef

fre y Hollin gsworth, Judge

No. E2008-00074-COA- R3-CV - FILED SEPT EMBER 30, 2009

D. M I CHAEL S W I NEY , J., concur ring.

I c on c ur fu lly in the Op ini on of thi s Court. I wr ite se pa rate ly onl y to fu rthe r a dd re ss one specific issue conce rning Husband’s “nee d” as rela ted to a limony. I agre e with the Opinion of thi s Co urt tha t “th e re c or d did not ind ic a te a ny a pp a re nt b a rr ie r p re ve nti ng Hu sb a nd fr om u sin g h is e du c a tio n a nd tr a ini ng to ga in ne w em plo yme nt.
.. ” a nd tha t Hus ba nd ’s su c c e ssf ul tr e a tme nt f

or his alcoholism rende red him ca pable of working at a

paying job. I agr ee w ith the Opinion o f t h is Court that the evidence shows that Husband a s an adult having both the ability a nd the health to w ork at some gainful employment h as t he responsibility to do so. I be lieve this principle would apply a s equally if the pa rties’ positions were reve rsed a nd it was Wife in Husband’s position. Given this, I believe the hol ding of this Court as expre ssed in the Court’s Opinion should be and would be the s ame even if the parties’ positions were reve rsed.

___________________________________ D. MICHAEL SWI NEY, JUDG E
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Kenneth Eade, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Independent Film Development Corporation;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Dated:  February 15, 2011



Kenneth G. Eade

Chief Financial Officer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 234 (Thursday, December 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 68883]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5977]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

Agency: Federal Election Commission.

Date & Time: Thursday, December 6, 2007, at 10 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.
    The Following Item Has Been Added To The Agenda: Advisory Opinion 
2007-29: Representative Jesse L. Jackson, Jr.

Person To Contact For Information: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-5977 Filed 12-4-07; 2:28 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [(Transmittal No. 08-10)]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-10 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: November 14, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 65307)          ( print page 65308)          ( print page 65309)          ( print page 65310)          ( print page 65311)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-5756 Filed 11-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
# C_2010194EN.01000801.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/8

---

ESPON 2013 Programme — New Calls for Project Proposals

2010/C 194/04

In the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, Calls for Proposals on 2 Targeted Analyses and the ESPON Database — Phase II will be launched on 24 August 2010. The deadline for applying is 19 October 2010.

Please visit http://www.espon.eu for more detailed information once these calls are open.

---
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mesquite Mining, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Beverly
Frederick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
20th day of October, 2008.


/s/ Beverly Frederick
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2010326EN.01001201.xml

| 3.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 December 2010

2010/C 326/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3155 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4521 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84450 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1531 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3160 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,010 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7097 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0055 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3036 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9600 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3614 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3291 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2194 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7553 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7248 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 512,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,1788 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7629 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4225 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 857,07 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1400 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,464 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,2985 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,524 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2405 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3014 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,5850 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3155

JPY

Japanese yen

110,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4521

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84450

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1531

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3160

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,010

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7097

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0055

RON

Romanian leu

4,3036

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9600

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3614

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3291

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2194

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7553

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7248

KRW

South Korean won

1 512,04

ZAR

South African rand

9,1788

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7629

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4225

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 857,07

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1400

PHP

Philippine peso

57,464

RUB

Russian rouble

41,2985

THB

Thai baht

39,524

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2405

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3014

INR

Indian rupee

59,5850

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 1 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 2 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 3 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 4 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 5 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 6 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 7 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 8 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 9 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 10 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 11 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 12 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 13 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 14 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 15 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 16 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 17 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 18 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 19 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 20 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 21 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 22 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 23 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 24 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 25 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 26 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 27 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 28 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 29 of 30Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 25 Filed 01/10/11 Page 30 of 30
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

PRESSLEY BERNARD ALSTON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cv107-SPM/AK

FRANK JOHN TASSONE, JR.,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISCONTINUE PAYMENTS FOR FILING FEE

This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s December 3, 2010, letter

to the Clerk of Court, which has been construed as a motion to discontinue

payments toward the filing fee. Plaintiff is required to pay the full amount of the

filing fee in accordance with Title 28, United States Code, Section 1915(b). The

fact that Plaintiff’s case was dismissed before the defendant was served with

process does not relieve Plaintiff of his obligation to pay the filing fee. See

Trupei v. United States, 304 Fed. App’x 776, 779-80 (11th Cir. 2008). 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Plaintiff’s motion (doc. 12) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent tothe incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form F-3 (File No. 333-194338, File No. 333-147024 and FileNo. 333-153055) and Form S-8 (File No. 333-148085, File No. 333-148754 and File No. 333-154795) of XTL BiopharmaceuticalsLtd. of our report dated April 26, 2015, which appears in this Form 20-F.

 

/s/ Kesselman & Kesselman

 

Kesselman & Kesselman

Certified Public Accountant (Isr.)

A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers InternationalLimited

Tel Aviv, Israel

April 26, 2015