alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                         OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer
of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (the Company), that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2005
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By:/s/
Alfred R. Kahn     
Alfred R. Kahn      Chairman of the Board and      Chief Executive
Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: May 10, 2005
|------------------

| | By:/s/
Joseph P. Garrity     
Joseph P. Garrity      Executive Vice President and      Chief Financial
Officer
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and will
be retained by 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 296 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 588.

Application by defendant for further review denied 31 August 1981.
April 9, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARIA SUAREZ, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00184-CV V.

DOW CORNING CORPORATION, CHILI ROBINSON MD, JAMES R. 

CULLINGTON MD, FRANCIS BURTON MD, SIMON FREDERICKS MD, 

TOLBERT WILKINSON MD, 21 INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS FKA KNOLL 

INTERNATIONAL, MILTON ROWLEY MD, WESLEY WASHBURN MD, 

PRESTON J. CHANDLER MD, WILSHIRE FOAM PRODUCTS INC., ERNEST 

CRONIN MD, JAMES PETERSON MD, THOMAS D. CRONIN MD, FRANK J. 

GEROW MD, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, AND DOW CHEMICAL 

COMPANY, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on January 29, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Maria Suarez.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JEAN M. MEADOWS, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv45-MP-GRJ

THE CITY OF INGLIS, FLORIDA

TIMOTHY LETSON, and

BRANDON ROBERTS, 

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

The court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement of this

matter. (See docs. 92 and 94). Therefore, consistent with Local Rule 16.2(D), the aboveentitled action is DISMISSED from the active docket of the court. In the event that the

settlement is not consummated, the court reserves the power, upon motion filed by any

party within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, to amend or vacate and set aside this

Order of Dismissal and reinstate this case. At this time, the Clerk is directed to close the

file in this case for administrative purposes, and upon the expiration of sixty (60) days

without activity, the Clerk is directed to close the case in its entirety for all purposes.

DONE and ORDERED this 31st day of July, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00045-MP-GRJ Document 96 Filed 07/31/12 Page 1 of 1
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-92,551-01

EX P ARTE ANG EL MEDINA, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1588954-A IN THE 184 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant pleade d g uilty to a g g rava ted sexual a ssault of a child and was sentenc ed to f orty y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary beca use trial counsel told him he wo u ld

rec eive probation if he ple aded g uilty

. He also contends that counsel did not investiga te or prese nt punishment evidenc e. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent , 393 S.W .3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013 ). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). Acc ording to Applicant’s motion to rema nd, trial2

counsel is dece ased. I f a response from counsel is impossibl e, the trial court shall deter mine whether counsel’s file from this case is available for inspection. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may

use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d), including the court’s persona l rec ollection. I t appea rs that Applicant is repr esente d by counsel. I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine if Applicant is repr esente d by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indige nt

. I f Ap p l icant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant at the he aring . T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s perf ormanc e was defic ient and Applicant wo u l d have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleg ed defic ient perf

ormanc e. The trial court shall also make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel was ineffe ctive for not discovering and presenting mitigation eviden ce . T h e trial court may make any other finding s and conclusions that it deems appropri at e in response to Applicant’s c laims. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety d ay s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavit s , motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: J une 23, 2021 Do not publish
# C_2010137EN.01002601.xml

| 27.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/26

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2010/C 137/11

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Portugal

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Portugal

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs with a view to informing all parties required to handle coins in the course of their work as well as the public at large (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), the Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national side features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Portugal

Subject of commemoration: 100th anniversary of Portugal becoming a republic

Description of the design: The inner part of the coin depicts, in the centre, the Portuguese coat of arms and the ‘República’ effigy, two of the most representative symbols of the Portuguese Republic, surrounded by the legend ‘República Portuguesa — 1910-2010’, the mintmark ‘INCM’ and the name of the author ‘JOSE CÂNDIDO’.

The outer ring of the coin depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Volume of issuance:

Date of issue: September 2010

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1, for the national sides of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# C_2011041EN.01000301.xml

| 10.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 February 2011

2011/C 41/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3647 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4560 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85000 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,7885 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3152 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8685 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,212 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,61 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7035 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8943 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2565 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1650 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3510 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3573 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6275 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7687 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7399 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 515,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8339 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,9930 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4158 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 180,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1473 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,383 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,0022 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,937 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2768 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4647 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,0500 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3647

JPY

Japanese yen

112,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4560

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85000

SEK

Swedish krona

8,7885

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3152

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8685

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,212

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,61

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7035

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8943

RON

Romanian leu

4,2565

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1650

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3510

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3573

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6275

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7687

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7399

KRW

South Korean won

1 515,22

ZAR

South African rand

9,8339

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,9930

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4158

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 180,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1473

PHP

Philippine peso

59,383

RUB

Russian rouble

40,0022

THB

Thai baht

41,937

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2768

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4647

INR

Indian rupee

62,0500

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<html>
	<head>
		<meta name="robots" content="noindex, nofollow" /><meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=https://www.cdc.gov/nora/default.html?CDC_AA_refVal=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cdc.gov%2Fniosh%2Fnora%2Findex.html" />	</head>
	<body></body>
	</html>
| (1)   | the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wishart Enterprises Limited for the      quarter ended May 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended May 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Tupper,    Inc. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Barbara  Lamb                                                               |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                           |
| Name:  | Barbara  Lamb                                                                  |
|   |                                                                           |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer,Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                           |
| Date:  | July      14, 2008                                                             |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CITIZENS STATE BANK,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:10-CV-224-SPM/GRJ

DIXIE COUNTY,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Plaintiff’s Motion to Modify

the Scheduling Order (doc. 39). The Defendant has filed a response in opposition

(doc. 49). The Court finds the Plaintiff’s request to be reasonable. Accordingly, it

is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order is

GRANTED.

DONE AND ORDERED this sixteenth day of June, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00224-SPM-GRJ Document 55 Filed 06/16/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011125EN.01000202.xml

| 28.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6083 — FIAT/GM/VM Motori JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 125/04

On 29 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6083. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6083. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 4:10cv477-RH/WCS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

NED NEWCOMER, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv477-RH/WCS

1021018 ALBERTA, LTD., a Canadian

company d/b/a JUST THINK MEDIA,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE 

THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

The plaintiff Ned Newcomer filed this purported class action against two 

defendants but voluntarily dismissed his claims against one, leaving as the sole 

defendant 1021018 Alberta, Ltd., doing business as Just Think Media (“JTM”). 

Two days before the discovery deadline, Mr. Newcomer moved for leave to file a 

second amended complaint adding a new defendant, CX Digital Media (U.S.), Inc., 

and, as a result of the amendment, to delay the pretrial schedule and continue the 

trial. As a matter of discretion, this order denies the motion for leave to amend.

Case 4:10-cv-00477-RH-WCS Document 133 Filed 01/25/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:10cv477-RH/WCS

The amendment comes late in the day, more than two months after an 

already long-extended deadline for amending. See Order of June 24, 2011, ECF 

No. 93, at 4. And the amendment would fundamentally alter the nature of the 

lawsuit. This would be true even if JTM could be expected to continue to defend 

the case vigorously. It is even more true in light of JTM’s circumstances: in a 

separate enforcement action, the FTC has obtained an order freezing JTM’s assets,

thus calling into question its ability to defend this case at all. The proposed 

amendment might have the practical effect of converting this case to a new 

proceeding against a new defendant. This would inject an unnecessary layer of 

procedural complexity. If Mr. Newcomer wishes to proceed with his new claim 

against CX, he can simply initiate a new case.

For these reasons,

IT IS ORDERED:

Mr. Newcomer’s motion, ECF No. 124, for leave to file the second amended 

complaint is DENIED.

SO ORDERED on January 25, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00477-RH-WCS Document 133 Filed 01/25/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MICHELINE HAMMOUDA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv38-SPM/WCS

HENRY E. MARINES,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated March 24, 2011 (doc. 8). Plaintiff has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). 

Plaintiff filed a letter (doc. 13) requesting more time to respond concerning

liability for the filing fee. It does not appear that Plaintiff is also seeking more

time to respond to the Report and Recommendation. But even if she were, for

reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Plaintiff cannot state a claim

against Defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 so as to bring her case within the

jurisdiction of this Federal court. Any malpractice or breach of contract claim that
Page 2 of 2

Plaintiff may have against Defendant should be filed in with the State court. 

Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined

that the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 8) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failure to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

3. The clerk shall note on the docket that the dismissal is pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

4. The clerk shall refer Plaintiff’s letter (doc. 13) to the magistrate

judge.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:11cv38-SPM/WCS
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed December 12, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-12-00955-CV

IN THE MATTER OF LATOYA NICHOLE ELLISON AND PINETO WOODARD

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV12-00279-V-292

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O’Neill, Myers, and Brown

Opinion by Justice O’Neill

Despite being given notice more than ten days ago that his brief was late and his appeal 

would be dismissed unless his brief was filed, appellant Pineto Woodard has not filed his brief or 

otherwise communicated with the Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, 

we dismiss the appeal. See id. 38.8(a), 42.3(b),(c).

 

120955F.P05

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE MATTER OF LATOYA 

NICHOLE ELLISON AND PINETO 

WOODARD

No. 05-12-00955-CV 

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV12-00279-V-292.

Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill. 

Justices Myers and Brown participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

We ORDER that appellee Latoya Nichole Ellison recover her costs, if any, of this appeal 

from appellant Pineto Woodard.

Judgment entered this 12th day of December, 2013.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O’NEILL

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

LOUIS REYNOLDS, et al.; 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

WENDELL HALL, 

 Defendant. 

/

No. 3:10-cv-355 MCR/EMT 

PLAINTIFFS’ (ACLU) ATTORNEY TIME RECORDS

 Plaintiffs give notice of filing separately and under seal time records in this matter for 

time spent through September 2010. See N. D. Fla. Loc. R. 54.1. The attorney time recorded in 

this filling totals 51.9 hours; the non-attorney time recorded in this filing totals 0 hours. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I electronically filed today the foregoing with the Clerk of the 

Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all persons 

registered for this case, including the Defendants’ counsel. 

Dated: October 15, 2010

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

s/ Benjamin James Stevenson

Benjamin James Stevenson (Fla. Bar. No. 

598909) 

American Civil Liberties Union Found. of 

Florida 

Post Office Box 12723 

Pensacola, FL 32591-2723 

bstevenson@aclufl.org 

Tel: 786.363.2738 

Fax: 786.363.1985 

Randall C. Marshall (Fla. Bar No.: 181765) 

RMarshall@aclufl.org 

Maria Kayanan (Fla. Bar No.: 305601) 

MKayanan@aclufl.org 

American Civil Liberties Union Found. of Florida 

4500 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 340 

Miami, Florida 33137 

Tel: 786.363.2707 

Fax: 786.363.1108 

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 3:10-cv-00355-MCR -EMT Document 15 Filed 10/15/10 Page 1 of 1