alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO . 12-14-00018-C R

STAT E O FTEXA S § I N TH E 

### § VS . § TWELFT H COUR T 

### § ROBER TCLAYTO N § O FAPPEAL S MOTIO N T O DISMIS S APPEA L T O TH E HONORABL E JUSTICE S O FSAI D COURT : N o wcome s ROBER TCLAYTON , Appellan ti n th e abov e style d an d numbere d case , befor e th e decisio n i n thi s Cour tha s bee n delivered , an d respectfull ymove s thi s Cour tt o withdra wappellant' s notic e o fappea l an d dismis s thi s appeal , pursuan tt o Rul e 42. 2 o fth e Texa s Rule s o fAppellat e Procedure
. Respectfull ysubmitted , Phili p C
. Fletche r Attorne ya tLa w 8 0 0 Nort h Mallar d Palestine , Texa s 7580 1 Tel : (903 ) 731-444 0 Fax : (903 ) 731-447 4

PHPLi P C
. FLETCHE R Stat e Ba rNo
. 0078747 8 fletchlaw@yahoo.co m Attorne yfo rROBER TCLAYTO N ACCEPTED 12-14-00018-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 7/9/2015 4:50:37 PM CATHY LUSK CLERKAppellan tCERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E

Thi s i s t o certif ytha to n , 2015 , a tru e an d correc tcop yo f t h e abov e an d foregoin g documen twa s serve d o n th e Distric tAttorney' s Office , Anderso n County , 50 0 Nort h Church , Palestine , Texas , b ypersona l delivery
.

PHILI P C
. FLETCHE RSTAT E O F TEXA S

COUNT YO F ANDERSO N § § § AFFIDAVI T BEFOR E ME , th e undersigne d authority , o n thi s da ypersonall y appeare d PHILI P C
. FLETCHER , wh o afte rbein g dul yswor n stated :

" I a m th e attorne yfo rth e appellan ti n th e abov e numbere d an d entitle d cause . I hav e rea d th e foregoin g Motio n t o Dismis s Appea l an d swea rtha tal l o fth e allegation s o ffac tcontaine d therei n ar e tru e an d correct. "

PHIUI P C
. FLETCHE R Affian t

2 0 1 5 , t o certif ywhic h witnes s m yhan d an d sea l o foffice
. SUBSCRIBE D AN D SWOR N T O BEFOR E M E o n CCOUNT YO F ANDERSO N

STAT E O F TEXA S 

### § § § AFFIDAVI T BEFOR E ME , th e undersigne d authority , o n thi s da ypersonall y appeare d ROBER TCLAYTON , wh o afte rbein g dul yswor n stated ;

" I a m th e appellan ti n th e above-entitie d an d numbere d cause . I hav e rea d th e foregoin g Motio n t o Dismis s Appea l an d swea r tha tal l o fth e allegation s o ffac tcontaine d therei n ar e tru e an d correct. "

SUBSCRIBE D AN D SWOR N T O BEFOR E M E o n 11- l6 2015 , t o certif ywhic h witnes s m yhan d an d sea l o foffice
. ROBER TCLAYT O Appellan t
#### William I. T. Fosdick, as Assignee of Joseph S. Mulroney, Respondent, *v.*Metal Shelter Co., Inc., Appellant.

(Submitted May 27, 1918;

decided June 4, 1918.)

Motion for re-hearing of- motion to amend remittitur. (See 223 N. Y. 653, 700).

Motion granted and decision of motion to amend remittitur herein amended so as to read as follows: *“*The question whether the judgment affects the taking of property without due" process of law and is violative of the Constitution, has not been considered for the reason that the question was not raised in the courts below.” Motion otherwise denied, without costs.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ELIJAH JACKSON, JR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-57-RS-CJK

EDWIN G. BUSS, Secretary,

Florida Department of Corrections, 

et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 130) and 

Plaintiff’s Objections (Docs. 176 & 177). 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and 

incorporated in this Order.

2. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for Plaintiff’s abuse of the 

judicial process. 

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on November 30, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00057-RS-CJK Document 178 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 72389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6120]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 6, 2007, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the national Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Semiconductor Test 
Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Kennan Yilmaz, Redmond, WA has been added as a party to 
this venture. Also, Mark Roos (individual member), Santa Clara, CA; 
Kevin Fetterly (individual member), Rollingbay, WA; AZ Electronic APPS, 
LLC, Chandler, AZ; Taiwan Semiconductor Mfg. Co., Hsinchu, TAIWAN have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On May 27, 2003, Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 17, 2003 (68 FR 35913).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 22, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on November 7, 2007 (72 FR 62868).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-6120 Filed 12-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

In Admiralty 

IN THE MATTER OF YOGI DAWG, INC.,

AS OWNER/OPERATOR OF THE F/V

RAW DAWG, PETITIONING FOR Case No. 5:11-cv-54/RS-GRJ

EXONERATION FROM DAMAGES OR

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

__________________________________/ 

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Noting Default (Doc. 10) and my Order (Doc. 6) 

which directed all prospective claimants to file their claims on or before April 25, 2011, pursuant 

to 46 U.S.C. § 30511, Rule F of the Supplemental Rules of Certain Admiralty and Maritime 

Claims of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Fla. N.D. Loc. R. F. 

IT IS ORDERED that all persons or corporations claiming damages for any and all loss, 

damage, or injury resulting from the alleged incident and not having filed the claim are hereby 

defaulted. 

 ORDERED on April 26, 2011. 

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00054-RS-GRJ Document 11 Filed 04/26/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2013011EN.01008602.xml

| 15.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/86

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel’

COM(2012) 413 final — 2012/0201 (COD)

2013/C 11/22

On 11 September 2012 the European Parliament and on 3 September 2012 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1100/2007 establishing measures for the recovery of the stock of European eel

COM(2012) 413 final — 2012/0201 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November 2012), by 150 votes to 1 with 6 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 14 November 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

GREGORY ROLAND,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00034-MP-GRJ

HON. JAMES T BROWNING,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 6, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, which recommends dismissing this case as frivolous. The time for filing objections has

passed, and none have been filed. The Court agrees that because the suit involves Judge

Browning’s judicial acts during a criminal case, he is absolutely immune from suit. 

Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and

incorporated herein. 

2. This case is dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of August, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00034-MP-GRJ Document 7 Filed 08/15/11 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION 

BRICE BUILDING CO., INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 5-10-mc-5/RS-GRJ

LANDMARK GENERAL CONTRACTORS,

INC.,

Defendant, 

and 

SUMMIT BANK,

Garnishee.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Plaintiff’s Motion for Writ of Garnishment and Appointment of 

Special Process Server (Doc. 10). 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Motion is GRANTED. 

2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 64 and 69, and Fla. Stat. § 77.01, et seq., the Clerk of 

the Court is directed to issue the Writ of Garnishment directed to the Garnishee, 

SUMMIT BANK. 
3. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.1(a), Mr. Charles Lance, an agent of L. Lance & 

Associates, LLC, is appointed as the special process server who shall serve the 

Writ of Garnishment. 

ORDERED on January 31, 2011

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2010316EN.01000801.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 November 2010

2010/C 316/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3674 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4554 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85520 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3945 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3607 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2000 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,719 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9345 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2980 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9785 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3903 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3957 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6031 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7620 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7744 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 546,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5667 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0789 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3953 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 255,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2660 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,848 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,4630 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,940 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3461 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8213 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,9855 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3674

JPY

Japanese yen

114,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4554

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85520

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3945

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3607

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2000

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,719

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9345

RON

Romanian leu

4,2980

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9785

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3903

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3957

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6031

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7620

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7744

KRW

South Korean won

1 546,70

ZAR

South African rand

9,5667

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0789

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3953

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 255,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2660

PHP

Philippine peso

59,848

RUB

Russian rouble

42,4630

THB

Thai baht

40,940

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3461

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8213

INR

Indian rupee

61,9855

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 225 (Friday, November 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65745-65749]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5793]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[FDA 225-07-8005]


Memorandum of Understanding Between the Food and Drug 
Administration and Duke University

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of 
a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between FDA and Duke University. 
The purpose of this MOU is to establish the terms of collaboration 
between FDA and Duke, beginning with an initiative to strengthen Human 
Subjects Protection by reexamining and modernizing the conduct of 
clinical trials to ensure that design, execution, and analysis are of 
optimal quality. To this end, Duke will be the convener of a Public 
Private Partnership, to which FDA will be a founding partner, to 
systematically modernize the clinical trial process.

DATES: The agreement became effective September, 22, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Robb, Office of Critical Path 
Programs, Office of Scientific and Medical Programs, Food and Drug 
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1516.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which 
states that all written agreements and MOUs between FDA and others 
shall be published in the Federal Register, the agency is publishing 
notice of this MOU.

    Dated: November 16, 2007.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P

[[Page 65746]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23NO07.000


[[Page 65747]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23NO07.001


[[Page 65748]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23NO07.002


[[Page 65749]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23NO07.003

[FR Doc. 07-5793 Filed 11-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION 

BRICE BUILDING CO., INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 5-10-mc-4/RS-EMT 

WILLIAM DEL LEE, an individual, 

and TALMEDGE E. LEE, an individual, 

Defendants, 

and 

VISION BANK,

Garnishee. 

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Plaintiff’s Motion to Dissolve Writ of Garnishment and 

Discharging Garnishee (Doc. 68). 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The relief requested in Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. 

2. The Writ of Garnishment (Doc. 62) issued by the Court on February 25, 2011, is 

dissolved and Garnishee is discharged from any liability under that Writ. 
3. The Clerk is directed to pay Garnishee’s attorney the statutory allowance for 

attorneys’ fees in the amount of $100.00 from the funds paid by Plaintiff to the 

clerk as set forth in FLA. STAT. § 77.28. 

ORDERED on March 14, 2011

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JAMES HARMON III,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:09-cv-189-MP-AK

MARTHA HUMPHRIES, WARDEN,

Respondent.

___________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, a pleading styled as a “Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus Ad Testificandum” pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(2) & (3), Doc. 2, a motion for

preliminary injunction, and Doc. 8, a motion to amend the petition by joining additional parties. 

Petitioner has paid the habeas corpus filing fee.

Although styled as a habeas corpus petition, a review of the pleadings reflects that Petitioner

is in fact challenging the Eleventh Circuit’s decision affirming this Court’s order dismissing a civil

rights case filed by Plaintiff for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), and this Court’s determination that such dismissal counted as a “strike” for

purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Harmon v. Webster, Case No. 07-13125 (11th Cir. 2/1/08)

(unpublished). Petitioner argues that the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion deprives him of access to court

and of liberty without due process of law, and that such deprivations may be redressed by this Court. 

Doc. 1. Petitioner’s motion for preliminary injunction, Doc. 2, reiterates these claims and prays for

an order enjoining enforcement of the Eleventh Circuit’s opinion against him. Petitioner’s motion

to amend, Doc. 8, seeks to name as additional respondents the Eleventh Circuit judges comprising
the panel that decided his appeal.

Pursuant to § 2241, the writ of habeas corpus extends, inter alia, to prisoners who are in

custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States. It is clear that

Petitioner’s claims are not in any way cognizable under § 2241, nor is there any other jurisdictional

basis for this Court to entertain Petitioner’s claims. Petitioner’s attempt to challenge the Eleventh

Circuit’s decision by way of a habeas petition in this Court is patently frivolous.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that:

(1) Petitioner’s motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 2) be DENIED;

(2) Petitioner’s motion to amend (Doc. 8) be DENIED; 

(3) The Petition (Doc. 1) be DENIED, and this case DISMISSED as frivolous; and

(4) In view of the fact that Petitioner has now accumulated at least three strikes pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), that Petitioner be WARNED that the filing of frivolous habeas petitions will

result in the imposition of monetary sanctions.

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 28th day of December, 2009.

_s/A. Kornblum_______________________

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations

within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond

to another party’s objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file

specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Millennium Challenge Corporation

          - [MCC FR 07-13] 

# AGENCY:

Millennium Challenge Corporation.

# Time and Date:

2 p.m. to 4 p.m., Wednesday, December 12, 2007.

# Place:

Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Information on the meeting may be obtained from Suzi M. Morris via e-mail at                         *Board@mcc.gov*                         or by telephone at (202) 521-3600.                    

# Status:

Meeting will be closed to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (“MCC”) will hold a meeting to consider the selection of countries that will be eligible for FY 2008 Millennium Challenge Account (“MCA”) assistance under Section 607 of the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003 (the “Act”), codified at 22 U.S.C. 7706, or Threshold Program assistance under Section 616 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7715); discuss progress on proposed Compacts with certain MCA-eligible countries; discuss MCC's proposed policy on suspension, remediation, and termination of assistance and eligibility; and certain administrative matters. The agenda items are expected to involve the consideration of classified information and the meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: November 29, 2007.

William G. Anderson, Jr.,

Vice President and General Counsel, Millennium Challenge Corporation.

[FR Doc. 07-5922 Filed 11-29-07; 12:22 pm]

BILLING CODE 9210-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:   May 12, 2006





By   /s/ Ted R. Sharp



Ted R, Sharp, Chief Financial Officer



















1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6305

JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SAMUEL G. WILSON, United States District

Judge; JON R. BOLYARD,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-86-R)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion for

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Wilson, No. CA97-86-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 6 & 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED