alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010101EN.01001201.xml

| 20.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 April 2010

2010/C 101/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3432 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4427 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88050 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6980 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4345 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9830 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,250 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7080 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9031 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1578 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0093 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4625 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3680 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4270 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8965 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8554 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 501,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0317 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1698 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2610 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 155,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3224 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,941 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,2675 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,379 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3738 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5490 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,0880 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3432

JPY

Japanese yen

123,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4427

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88050

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6980

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4345

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9830

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,250

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7080

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9031

RON

Romanian leu

4,1578

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0093

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4625

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3680

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4270

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8965

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8554

KRW

South Korean won

1 501,86

ZAR

South African rand

10,0317

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1698

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2610

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 155,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3224

PHP

Philippine peso

59,941

RUB

Russian rouble

39,2675

THB

Thai baht

43,379

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3738

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5490

INR

Indian rupee

60,0880

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JEAN BERTON SAINT-FLEUR, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv457-MP-GRJ

WARDEN LANE, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated August 11, 2011. (Doc. 25). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. Plaintiff's Complaint (doc.1) is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915A. The dismissal of this case shall count as a strike pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of December, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:10-cv-00457-MP-GRJ Document 30 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011023EN.01000501.xml

| 25.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6020 — ACS/Hochtief)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 23/02

On 14 January 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6020. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6020. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPSM, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence Calarco, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Lawrence Calarco

Lawrence Calarco

Chief Executive Officer

December 23, 2016

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPSM, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Dargan II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Charles Dargan II

Charles Dargan II

Chief Financial Officer

December 23, 2016
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2414 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the Health Coverage 

Tax Credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2019 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Mr. BROWN, and Mr. CASEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend 

the Health Coverage Tax Credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HEALTH COVERAGE TAX CRED4 IT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

6 35(b)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘January 1, 2020’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 

8 2025’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2414 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to coverage months beginning after 

3 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2010089EN.01000901.xml

| 7.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/9

---

ESPON 2013 Programme — New open calls

2010/C 89/05

In the framework of the ESPON 2013 Programme, calls for proposals on applied research, targeted analyses and transnational networking activities will be launched on 3 May 2010.

Please visit http://www.espon.eu for more detailed information once these calls are open.

---
#### LINDSTROM v. CHESNUTT

No. 180 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 15.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 14 September 1972.
| 1. | Such Quarterly      Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, fully      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations      of Global Holdings, Inc. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Global      Holdings,      Inc. |
|---------------------------------|
|                            |     |
| By:                        | /s/      Terrence      A. Tecco |
|                       | Terrence      A. Tecco |
|                            | Chief Executive      Officer and President  |
|                       |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 08-17]

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 08-17 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: December 11, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 71657)          ( print page 71658)          ( print page 71659)          ( print page 71660)          ( print page 71661)          ( print page 71662)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-6063 Filed 12-17-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
# C_2011077EN.01000401.xml

| 11.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6115 — Steinhoff/Conforama)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 77/03

On 7 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6115. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6115. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Harold Hartley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
InfoSpi, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of InfoSpi, Inc.


Date: 7/22/09                               By: /s/ Harold Hartley
                                                --------------------------------
                                            Name:  Harold Hartley
                                            Title: Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-50726

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

James Robert Cupples, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:21-CR-367-1

______________________________

Before Jolly, Smith, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

James Robert Cupples pleaded guilty to one count of receipt of child 

pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) and (b)(1). The district 

court sentenced him to 198 months of imprisonment, to be followed by 

10 years of supervised release. Cupples challenges the application of a higher 

offense level under U.S.S.G. § 2G2.1 by operation of the cross-reference in 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 20, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50726 Document: 00516828049 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/20/2023
No. 22-50726

2

U.S.S.G. § 2G2.2(c)(1), which “is to be construed broadly.” § 2G2.2, 

comment. (n.7(A)). We review the district court’s interpretation and 

application of the Guidelines de novo and its factual findings for clear error. 

See United States v. Ferris, 52 F.4th 235, 239 (5th Cir. 2022), cert. denied, 143 

S. Ct. 846 (2023).

The record supports the district court’s determination that the 

Government proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Cupples

caused a minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of 

producing a visual depiction of such conduct. See § 2G2.2, comment. 

(n.7(A)); United States v. Landreneau, 967 F.3d 443, 451 (5th Cir. 2020); 

United States v. Rodriguez, 630 F.3d 377, 380 (5th Cir. 2011). And as Cupples 

concedes, the court properly enhanced his sentence under § 2G2.1(b)(2)(A) 

because the offense involved the commission of sexual contact. See United 

States v. Butler, 65 F.4th 199, 201-03 (5th Cir. 2023); United States v. Salinas, 

918 F.3d 463, 465 (5th Cir. 2019).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-50726 Document: 00516828049 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/20/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         6,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,000
<PP&E>                                         464,182
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 470,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          525,009
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,238,223
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,293,050)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   470,182
<SALES>                                        59,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               59,500
<CGS>                                          20,217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  20,217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,379,003
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,339,720)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,339,720)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,339,720)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.17)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Southwest Iowa Renewable Energy, LLC (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brian T. Cahill, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Brian T. Cahill


President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: May 11, 2010










28
#### STATE v. MRS. OTTIS COPPLEY.

(Filed 20 November 1963.)

Bills and Notes § 20—

Where the evidence discloses that the check issued by defendant was returned by the bank, mot on .account of insufficient funds, but because if was written on the wrong kind of check form, the court should enter a judgment of not guilty in a prosecution for issuing a worthless check.

Appeal (by defendant from *McConnell, J.,*February 18, 1963 Session, RowaN Superior Court.

In this criminal prosecution the State charged that on January 9, 1961, Mrs. Ottis Coppley “did unlawfully, wilfully, draw, malee, utter, Asisue and deliver- to Wallace Motor Company a check drawn on the Commercial Bank of Lexington, N. C., for the payment of money in the sum of $11.94, knowing at the time of the making, drawing, uttering, issuing, and delivering of said check as aforesaid that she did not have sufficient funds on deposit in or credit with said bank with which to pay the same upon presentation.”

The defendant entered a plea of not guilty. The following w.ais in evidence from the bank upon which the check was drawn:. ... , ;i

*543“This is 'to 'Certify that the check for $11.94 'referred to beloiw wais presented to us for payment on February 11, 1961. I-t wa.s goiod for the amount for which it was drawn and wais not returned on account of insufficient fundís but because it wais written on tibe wrong kind of 'check form. Mrs. Goppley isay© she did not 'have one of her' ehecbs on us at the time, and that the payee insisted that he change one of -hois forms, /s/ Commercial Bank of Lexington, by: J. W. McLendon.”

From a verdict of guilty and judgment, the defendant appealed.

*T.. W. Bruton, Attorney General, James F. Bullock, Asst. Attorney General for the State.*

*Henderson •& Yeager by Buford T. Henderson, Frank J. Yeager for defendant appellant.*

PeR Cueiam.

The certificate from the Commercial Bank of Lexington wais in evidence, uneonifaraidicted and unchallenged. That evidence made out a complete defense to the charge. The court should have entered a judgment of not guilty. The judgment and verdict are set aside. The cause is remanded for disposition as here directed.

Reversed.
# C_2010289EN.01000301.xml

| 26.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5814 — CVC/Univar Europe/Eurochem)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 289/02

On 16 July 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5814. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5814. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 39 Filed 12/08/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 39 Filed 12/08/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 39 Filed 12/08/10 Page 3 of 3