alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CORY T. PERRY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv311-RH/EMT

WALTER McNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 9, and the objections, ECF No. 10. I have reviewed de

novo the issues raised by the objections. 

The report and recommendation concludes that the case should be dismissed

without prejudice based on the plaintiff’s failure to disclose a prior lawsuit as

required by this district’s standard prisoner civil-rights complaint form. Dismissal

without prejudice is not too severe a sanction under these circumstances, especially

for a complaint with allegations like the plaintiff’s. If the form is to serve its

purpose, a plaintiff must provide accurate information. If word got around the

prisons that inaccurate or incomplete information could be provided with no
Page 2 of 2

effective sanction, the form would serve little purpose. And word does get around

the prisons.

For these reasons, and the additional reasons set out in the report and

recommendation, 

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is dismissed

without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on January 31, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case No: 5:10cv311-RH/EMT
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 516 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce the mortgage interest 

deduction relating to acquisition indebtedness for certain taxpayers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2017 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce 

the mortgage interest deduction relating to acquisition 

indebtedness for certain taxpayers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Benefit for Home5 ownership Clarification Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 516 IH

1 SEC. 2. REDUCTION IN LIMITATION ON MORTGAGE INTER2 EST DEDUCTION RELATING TO ACQUISITION 

3 INDEBTEDNESS FOR CERTAIN TAXPAYERS. 

4 (a) ACQUISITION INDEBTEDNESS.—Clause (ii) of sec5 tion 163(h)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

6 is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(ii) LIMITATION.—The aggregate 

8 amount treated as acquisition indebtedness 

9 for any period shall not exceed— 

10 ‘‘(I) $1,000,000 in the case of a 

11 joint return ($500,000 in the case of 

12 a married individual filing a separate 

13 return), and 

14 ‘‘(II) the applicable amount in 

15 any other case. 

16 ‘‘(iii) APPLICABLE AMOUNT.—For 

17 purposes of clause (ii)(II), the applicable 

18 amount is as follows: 

‘‘For taxable years— The applicable 

amount is— 

Beginning in calendar year 2018 ............................................... $900,000

Beginning in calendar year 2019 ............................................... $800,000

Beginning in calendar year 2020 ............................................... $700,000

Beginning in calendar year 2021 ............................................... $600,000

Beginning in or after calendar year 2022 .................................. $500,000.’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 516 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to amounts paid or incurred 

3 after December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO






SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly report of AMP Holding Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul V. Gonzales, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: August 19, 2011
/s/Paul V. GonzalesPaul V. Gonzales,Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JEFFERY L. COLE, #990003097

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv458/RV/EMT

MILTON CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and

PATRICK BURNS,

Defendants.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated November 19, 2010 (Doc. 5). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of December, 2010.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MICHAEL STEINBERG, MIRIAM STEINBERG,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00236-MP -GRJ

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 25, Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer

by Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The plaintiffs agree to the extension of time, and it is

granted, nunc pro tunc to March 22, 2011. Additionally, the parties have filed a Joint Report

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, Doc. 23, in which the parties agree to all deadlines. The Joint Report is

adopted, and the Clerk is directed to set the appropriate deadlines therefrom. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
EXHIBIT 11.1

EF JOHNSON TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES  COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE  December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007  (in thousands, except share and per share data)

2009

2008

2007Net loss

$
(12,228
)
$
(20,873
)
$
(41,099
)Net loss per shareBasic:Weighted average common sharesBasic


26,386,388


26,261,062


26,039,246Net loss per shareBasic

$
(0.46
)
$
(0.79
)
$
(1.58
)Net loss per shareDiluted:Potential dilutive common shares:Weighted average common sharesBasic


26,386,388


26,261,062


26,039,246Dilutive effect of shares under employee stock plans


416,970


315,746


67,570Weighted average restricted shares granted


11,644


113,679


297,405Weighted average common sharesDiluted


26,815,002


26,690,487


26,404,221Net loss per shareDiluted

$
(0.46
)
$
(0.79
)
$
(1.58
)


Although
we have disclosed both basic and dilutive weighted average common shares, only basic weighted average shares were used to compute earnings per share due to the net loss reported
in each year.

---



QuickLinks
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5203 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to require producers to elect to 

receive price loss coverage or agriculture risk coverage under that Act 

or Federal crop insurance under the Federal Crop Insurance Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2018 

Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to require producers 

to elect to receive price loss coverage or agriculture risk 

coverage under that Act or Federal crop insurance under 

the Federal Crop Insurance Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRODUCER ELECTION TO RECEIVE PRICE LOSS 

4 COVERAGE OR AGRICULTURE RISK COV5 ERAGE OR FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE. 

6 Section 1115 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 

7 U.S.C. 9015) is amended— 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5203 IH

1 (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as sub2 section (g); and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(f) ELECTION TO RECEIVE PRICE LOSS COVERAGE

6 OR AGRICULTURE RISK COVERAGE OR FEDERAL CROP

7 INSURANCE.—For the 2018 crop year, all of the producers 

8 on a farm shall elect to receive— 

9 ‘‘(1) price loss coverage or agriculture risk cov10 erage, as determined by the election of the producers 

11 on the farm under this section for the 2014 through 

12 2018 crop years; or 

13 ‘‘(2) Federal crop insurance under the Federal 

14 Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trevenex Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Raymond Kuh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                     |                        
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|Dated:  May 14, 2009 | By: /s/ Raymond Kuh    
|                     | Raymond Kuh            
|                     | Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

d1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

137473 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 137473 

 COA: 278268 

Macomb CC: 2006-004308-FC 

DONALD GAVIN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 11, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, C.J., would grant leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in her opinion in 

People v Idziak, 484 Mich 549 (2009).
# C_2011164EN.01001002.xml

| 2.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6087 — Orkla/REC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 164/06

On 23 May 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6087. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6087. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FITOLAY J. DEMESMIN,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:11cv81-WS

OFFICER ANDREW GAZAPIAN,

and SECRETARY EDWIN BUSS,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 6)

docketed March 7, 2011. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's

complaint be dismissed as frivolous. The plaintiff has filed no objections to the

magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed the record and has determined that the magistrate

judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 6) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The plaintiff's complaint, and this action, are hereby DISMISSED as

frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall note on the docket

that this case was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of April , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2010008EN.01000201.xml

| 14.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 January 2010

2010/C 8/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4563 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,02 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4405 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89460 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1978 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4788 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1785 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,168 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,82 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0563 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1179 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1072 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5729 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5065 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2934 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9632 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0209 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 639,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,7402 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9419 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2850 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 324,06 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8768 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,781 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,0400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,098 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5345 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,5678 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,3270 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4563

JPY

Japanese yen

133,02

DKK

Danish krone

7,4405

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89460

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1978

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4788

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1785

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,168

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,82

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0563

RON

Romanian leu

4,1179

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1072

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5729

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5065

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2934

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9632

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0209

KRW

South Korean won

1 639,22

ZAR

South African rand

10,7402

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9419

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2850

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 324,06

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8768

PHP

Philippine peso

66,781

RUB

Russian rouble

43,0400

THB

Thai baht

48,098

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5345

MXN

Mexican peso

18,5678

INR

Indian rupee

66,3270

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

THOMAS OVERHOLT, 

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv482/MCR/EMT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated March 22, 2011. (Doc. 13). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2011063EN.01000101.xml

| 26.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/1

---

2011/C 63/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 55, 19.2.2011

OJ C 55, 19.2.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 46, 12.2.2011

OJ C 38, 5.2.2011

OJ C 30, 29.1.2011

OJ C 13, 15.1.2011

OJ C 346, 18.12.2010

OJ C 328, 4.12.2010

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2010337EN.01001301.xml

| 14.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 December 2010

2010/C 337/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3267 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4545 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84375 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1464 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2987 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9265 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,168 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,34 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7095 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0156 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2925 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9970 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3390 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3359 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3175 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7630 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7353 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 518,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,0900 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8451 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4175 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 961,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1658 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,247 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,9723 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,889 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2648 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4982 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,9120 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3267

JPY

Japanese yen

111,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4545

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84375

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1464

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2987

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9265

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,168

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,34

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7095

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0156

RON

Romanian leu

4,2925

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9970

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3390

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3359

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3175

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7630

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7353

KRW

South Korean won

1 518,96

ZAR

South African rand

9,0900

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8451

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4175

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 961,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1658

PHP

Philippine peso

58,247

RUB

Russian rouble

40,9723

THB

Thai baht

39,889

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2648

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4982

INR

Indian rupee

59,9120

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---