alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                  |   |                                                                                    |   |
|-----------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: August 12, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Andrew Kovalenko                                                               |   |
|                  |   | Andrew KovalenkoChairman, PresidentChief Executive Officer(Principle Executive Officer) |   |
Exhibit 31(a)

CERTIFICATIONS

** 
I, Joseph F. Domino, certify that:  
1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Entergy Texas, Inc.;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:   
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

		/s/ Joseph F. Domino			

**
Case 3:01-cr-00076-RV   Document 52   Filed 12/20/06   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:01-cr-00076-RV   Document 52   Filed 12/20/06   Page 2 of 2
# C_2010110EN.01000501.xml

| 29.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/5

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

2010/C 110/05

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| — | EPSO/AD/178/10 — Librarianship/Information Science |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/178/10 — Librarianship/Information Science

| — | EPSO/AD/179/10 — Audiovisual |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/179/10 — Audiovisual

| — | EPSO/AD/180/10 — Information systems security (INFOSEC) |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/180/10 — Information systems security (INFOSEC)

| — | EPSO/AD/181/10 — Competition law |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/181/10 — Competition law

| — | EPSO/AD/182/10 — Industrial economics |
| --- | --- |

—

EPSO/AD/182/10 — Industrial economics

The competition notices are published in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 110 A of 29 April 2010 in 23 languages.

Official Journal of the European Union

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5314 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5314

    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited 
eligibility for health care for mental illnesses for veterans of combat 
         service during certain periods of hostilities and war.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2018

 Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Neal, Mr. Peters, Ms. 
 Eshoo, Mr. Deutch, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Kilmer, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson 
of Texas, Mr. Jones, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. Kildee, Mr. Rush, Mr. Ryan of 
 Ohio, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Kelly of Illinois, Ms. Wilson of Florida, Mr. 
   O'Rourke, Mr. Heck, and Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for unlimited 
eligibility for health care for mental illnesses for veterans of combat 
         service during certain periods of hostilities and war.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Mental Health Accessibility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. UNLIMITED ELIGIBILITY FOR HEALTH CARE FOR MENTAL ILLNESSES FOR 
              VETERANS OF COMBAT SERVICE DURING CERTAIN PERIODS OF 
              HOSTILITIES AND WAR.

    (a) Eligibility.--Section 1710(e)(1) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(G) Notwithstanding paragraphs (2) and (3), a veteran who served 
on active duty in a theater of combat operations (as determined by the 
Secretary in consultation with the Secretary of Defense) during World 
War II, the Korean conflict, the Vietnam Era, the Persian Gulf War, 
Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, or any other 
period of war after the Persian Gulf War, or in combat against a 
hostile force during a period of hostilities (as defined in section 
1712A(a)(2)(B) of this title), is eligible for hospital care, medical 
services, and nursing home care under subsection (a)(2)(F) for any 
mental illness, notwithstanding that there is insufficient medical 
evidence to conclude that such illness is attributable to such 
service.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subparagraph (G) of section 1710(e)(1) of 
title 38, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall apply 
with respect to hospital care, medical services, and nursing home care 
provided on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Kathy Ordoñez, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, the quarterly report of Celera Corporation on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 27, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Celera Corporation.



|                  |  |     |  |                                       
|----------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2010 |  |     |  |                                       
|                  |  |    
|                  |  | By: |  | /s/ KATHY ORDOÑEZ                     
|                  |  |     |  | Kathy Ordoñez
Chief Executivet Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DERREL THOMAS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-46-MP-GRJ

JORAM PEREZ, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This case is before the court on the parties’ Joint Motion for Dismissal with

Prejudice. (Doc. 50.) Pursuant to the motion and in accordance with Rule

41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is directed to enter

judgment dismissing this case with prejudice, each party to bear its own attorney’s fees

and costs. The Clerk is further directed to terminate all pending motions and close the

file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6 day of August 2012. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:11-cv-00046-MP-GRJ Document 51 Filed 08/06/12 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

In Admiralty 

IN THE MATTER OF YOGI DAWG, INC.,

AS OWNER/OPERATOR OF THE F/V

RAW DAWG, PETITIONING FOR Case No. 5:11-cv-54/RS-GRJ

EXONERATION FROM DAMAGES OR

LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

__________________________________/ 

ORDER

Before me are Petitioner’s Complaint (Doc. 1) and deposit of $1500.00 with the Clerk of 

the Court (Doc. 5). Pursuant to 46 U.S.C § 30511, Rule F of the Supplemental Rules of Certain 

Admiralty and Maritime Claims of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Fla. N.D. Loc. R. F, 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Affidavit of Value (Doc. 1, Attach. 3) of Petitioner's interest in the F/V RAW 

DAWG in the amount of $1,000.00, Affidavit of Freight (Doc. 1, Attach. 2) in the 

amount of $0.00, and the Cost Bond in the amount of $1,500.00, which includes 

security for costs in the amount of $500.00, is accepted as a good faith stipulation for 

value for the purpose of the limitation proceedings.

2. Any claimant who may properly become a party may contest the amount or value of 

petitioner's interest in the F/V RAW DAWG and her pending freight, and may move 

the Court for new appraisal and may apply to have the amount increased or diminished.
3. Petitioner shall cause notice to be issued to all parties asserting claims with respect to 

which the Complaint seeks exoneration or limitation. The Notice shall comply with 

the Supplemental Rules and with Local Rules (A) and (F), and shall admonish them to 

file their respective claims or answers with the Clerk of Court for the United States 

District Court, Northern District of Florida, in writing, and to serve on the attorneys for 

petitioner a copy thereof on or before April 25, 2011, or be defaulted. 

4. Petitioner shall cause the notice to be published in the form required by Supplemental 

Rule F of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules (A) and (F) once a 

week for four successive weeks prior to April 25, 2011 in The News Herald, a 

newspaper of general circulation published in Panama City, Florida. Copies of the 

notice shall also be mailed in accordance with Supplemental Rule F.

5. Commencement and/or further prosecution of any action or proceeding against 

Petitioner, its employees, its insurers, or any of their property with respect to any claim 

for which Petitioner seeks exoneration from or limitation of liability, is hereby stayed 

until the hearing of determination of this proceeding. 

 ORDERED on March 7, 2011. 

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1252]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-62]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold the following meeting during the week 
of January 8, 2007:
    A Closed Meeting will be held on Thursday, January 11, 2007 at 2 
p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsels to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters may also be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (4), (5), (7), (8), (9)(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a) (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), (9)(ii), and (10) permit 
consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Nazareth, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the closed meeting in closed session.
    The subject matters of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
January 11, 2007 will be:

Formal orders of investigation;
Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings of an 
enforcement nature;
An adjudicatory matter;
A regulatory matter regarding a financial institution;
Amicus consideration; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: January 4, 2007.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-62 Filed 1-5-07; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# C_2011223EN.01000201.xml

| 29.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6184 — Indorama/Sinterama/Trevira)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 223/03

On 9 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6184. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6184. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00207-SPM-GRJ

DAVID MORGAN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Pending before the Court upon referral by the Clerk is the Answer For

Defendant, Sawgrass Tiki Bar, Inc. (Doc. 18.) The answer is not signed by an attorney

but instead is signed by Susan Bridges, President of Sawgrass Tiki Bar, Inc. “The rule

is well established that a corporation is an artificial entity that can act only through

agents, cannot appear pro se, and must be represented by counsel.” Palazzo v. Gulf Oil

Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11 Cir. 1985); Nat’l Indep. Theatre Exhibitors, Inc. v.

th

Buena Vista Distribution Co., 748 F.2d 602, 609 (11th Cir. 1984) (“[C]orporations must

always be represented by legal counsel.”) Therefore, Defendant Sawgrass Tiki Bar,

Inc. cannot appear as a pro se litigant in this matter, nor can Susan Bridges as

President, appear in a representative capacity on behalf of the Defendant Sawgrass

Tiki Bar, Inc. 

 Accordingly, the Answer For Defendant, Sawgrass Tiki Bar, Inc. (Doc.18) is 

STRICKEN. Defendant, Sawgrass Tiki Bar, Inc. shall have fourteen (14) days from the

date of this Order to file a response to the Complaint signed by an attorney admitted to
Page 2 of 2

practice law in the Bar of this Court, failing which a default may be entered upon the

filing of a proper motion.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2011. 

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00207-SPM -GRJ
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JENNIFER XU,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00187-MP-GRJ

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, DIVISION OF RISK

MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 116, Consent Motion for Extension of Time to

File Pretrial Stipulation by Jennifer Xu. The trial has been continued to April 23, 2012 and the

parties request that they be permitted to file the pretrial stipulation on or before January 15,

2012. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Stipulation, Doc. 116, is

GRANTED.

2. The parties shall file the pretrial stipulation on or before January 15, 2012.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:09-cv-00187-MCR-GRJ Document 117 Filed 10/21/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

EDWARD DEVON JOHNSON, JR.,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv430/LAC/EMT

WARDEN ANTHONY HAYNES, FCI

JESUP,

Respondent.

_______________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal of his habeas

petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 23). As grounds for dismissal, Petitioner states that

he wishes to take the proper steps to file his petition in the proper court (see doc. 20, Government’s

supplemental response recommending denial of the petition on this basis).

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That Petitioner’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal (doc. 23) be GRANTED and this action

be dismissed without prejudice.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 24th day of October 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00430-LC-EMT Document 24 Filed 10/24/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No.: 3:10cv430/LAC/EMT

Case 3:10-cv-00430-LC-EMT Document 24 Filed 10/24/11 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2169 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2169

 To amend section 3116 of title 5, United States Code, to clarify the 
  applicability of the appointment limitations for students appointed 
   under the expedited hiring authority for post-secondary students.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 18, 2019

 Mr. Lankford (for himself, Mr. Peters, and Ms. Sinema) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
               Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 3116 of title 5, United States Code, to clarify the 
  applicability of the appointment limitations for students appointed 
   under the expedited hiring authority for post-secondary students.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF LIMITATION ON EXPEDITED HIRING AUTHORITY 
              FOR POST-SECONDARY STUDENTS.

    Section 3116(d)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended to 
read as follows:
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        total number of students that the head of an agency may appoint 
        under this section during a fiscal year may not exceed the 
        number equal to 15 percent of the number of students that the 
        agency head appointed during the previous fiscal year to a 
        position at the GS-11 level, or an equivalent level, or 
        below.''.
                                 <all>
```