alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of WindTamer Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Molly Hedges, as Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: November 15, 2010/s/ Molly HedgesMolly HedgesActing Chief Financial Officer
 
 This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### STATE v. BLACKBURN

No. 32 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 683.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 23 February 1978.
# C_2010072EN.01000901.xml

| 20.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5729 — Bank of America/Barclays Bank/DSI International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 72/05

On 25 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5729. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5729. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 Of THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Douglas R. Waggoner, Chief Executive Officer of Echo Global Logistics, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, that:





(1)   The Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





November 8, 2010/s/ DOUGLAS R. WAGGONERDouglas R. WaggonerChief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 231 (Monday, December 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 67995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5899]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at Auburn-Opelika Airport, Auburn, AL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on land release request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. 47153(c), notice is 
being given that the FAA is considering a request from Auburn 
University to release a 1.603-acre parcel of airport property, located 
at the Auburn-Opelika Airport, to the City of Auburn to construct a 
public access road on the property to the new airport terminal area.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 2, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address:
    Jackson Airports District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, 
Jackson, MS 39208-2307.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Mr. Bill Hutto Jr., Executive Director, at the 
following address:
    Mr. William T. Hutto, Jr., Executive Director, Auburn University 
Aviation, 700 Airport Road, Auburn, AL 36830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keafur Grimes, Program Manager, 
Jackson Airports District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, 
Jackson, MS 39208-2307, (601) 664-9886. The land release request may be 
reviewed in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is reviewing a request by Auburn 
University Aviation to release 1.603 acres of airport property at the 
Auburn-Opelika Airport. The property will be released to the City of 
Auburn to construct a public access road to the new terminal area at 
the airport. The net value of the released property will be reinvested 
in the new Auburn-Opelika Terminal Building.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the request, 
notice and other documents germane to the request in person at the 
Auburn-Opelika Airport.

    Issued in Jackson, Mississippi, on November 19, 2007.
Kristi Ashley,
Acting Manager, Jackson Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 07-5899 Filed 11-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5319 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5319

    To transfer Coast Guard property in the Town of Jupiter Island, 
     Florida, for inclusion in Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2018

  Mr. Mast (for himself, Mr. Hastings, and Mr. Deutch) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
    and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Natural 
 Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To transfer Coast Guard property in the Town of Jupiter Island, 
     Florida, for inclusion in Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSFER OF COAST GUARD PROPERTY IN JUPITER ISLAND, FLORIDA, 
              FOR INCLUSION IN HOBE SOUND NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE.

    (a) Transfer.--Administrative jurisdiction over the property 
described in subsection (b) is transferred to the Secretary of the 
Interior.
    (b) Property Described.--The property referred to in subsection (a) 
is real property administered by the Coast Guard in the Town of Jupiter 
Island, Florida, comprising Parcel #35-38-42-004-000-02590-6 (Bon Air 
Beach lots 259 and 260 located at 83 North Beach Road) and Parcel #35-
38-42-004-000-02610-2 (Bon Air Beach lots 261 to 267), including any 
improvements thereon that are not authorized or required by another 
provision of law to be conveyed to another person.
    (c) Administration.--The property described in subsection (b) is 
included in Hobe Sound National Wildlife Refuge, and shall be 
administered by the Secretary of the Interior acting through the United 
States Fish and Wildlife Service.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6070

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus COREY MICHAEL LEFTWICH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:00-cr-37-1H; 4-04-cv-10-H) Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 5, 2006 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corey Michael Leftwich, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Corey Michael Leftwich seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion as untimely filed and denying his subsequent Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend judgment. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Leftwich has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

SOLCIUS, LLC and GOODLEAP, LLC

(formerly known as LOANPAL),

Appellants,

v.

SALVADOR MERAZ,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-22-00146-CV

Appeal from the

168th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2021DCV3036)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore reverse the trial court’s order denying the motion to compel arbitration 

and remand the case to the trial court with directions to order the parties to arbitration and to stay 

Appellant’s lawsuit pending the outcome of the arbitration. We further order that Appellants

recover from Appellee all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Soto, J., Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.) (sitting by assignment)
# C_2011212EN.01001801.xml

| 19.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/18

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6175 — Danaher/Beckman Coulter)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 212/06

On 16 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6175. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6175. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BRIAN RICHARDSON,

 Plaintiff,

vs. 5:10cv245/MCR/MD

N. ROBINSON, et al.

 Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon plaintiff’s motion to dismiss case without

prejudice. (Doc. 3). Plaintiff seeks to dismiss his case without prejudice to pursue

administrative remedies, in light of the fact that his original motion for emergency relief has

become moot. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That plaintiff’s motion to dismiss case without prejudice (doc. 7) be granted and this

case be dismissed without prejudice, as requested.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 13th day of October, 2010.

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may appear on

the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A copy of

any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858

F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CEDRIC BELL, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv119-MP-CAS

DR. MAURICE MARHALIC, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated April 16, 2012. (Doc. 31). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute

DONE and ORDERED this 21st day of May, 2012.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:11-cv-00119-MP-CAS Document 33 Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011230EN.01000201.xml

| 5.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 August 2011

2011/C 230/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4229 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4486 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87145 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1494 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1012 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7405 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,308 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,09 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0313 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2122 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,4567 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3466 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3829 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0983 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6764 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7287 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 518,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7581 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1621 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4492 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 110,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2545 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,372 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,8075 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,459 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2312 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9823 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,3870 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4229

JPY

Japanese yen

113,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4486

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87145

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1494

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1012

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7405

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,308

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,09

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0313

RON

Romanian leu

4,2122

TRY

Turkish lira

2,4567

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3466

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3829

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0983

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6764

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7287

KRW

South Korean won

1 518,34

ZAR

South African rand

9,7581

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1621

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4492

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 110,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2545

PHP

Philippine peso

60,372

RUB

Russian rouble

39,8075

THB

Thai baht

42,459

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2312

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9823

INR

Indian rupee

63,3870

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MICHAEL R. KELLER, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11cv77-MP-GRJ

RUSSELL HINOTE and

C. HOLMES, 

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated May 31, 2012. (Doc. 31). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. Defendant Hinote’s first motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (doc. 26)

is GRANTED. Defendant Hinote’s second motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (doc.

30) is DENIED as moot.

3. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for

failure to obey an order of this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of June, 2012.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:11-cv-00077-MP-GRJ Document 32 Filed 06/30/12 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011178EN.01000201.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6219 — Advent International Corporation/Provimi Pet Food Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 178/03

On 23 May 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6219. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6219. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011041EN.01007501.xml

| 10.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/75 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/75

---

Corrigendum to guidance on the preparation of an application for authorisation

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 28 of 28 January 2011
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 28 of 28 January 2011

2011/C 41/09

On the cover, in the title:

for:

read:

on page 1, in the title:

for:

read:

---

(1)  Disclaimer: This document cannot in any circumstances be regarded as a position of the Commission.’,

1

(2)  The final version will be published by the European Chemicals Agency on its website.’.

2

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

In Re SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORP.

consolidated cases,

CASE NO. 5:11-cv-32/RS-CJK

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Because all but one named defendant has been terminated from the lead case, and

because the nature of these consolidated cases results in quick termination of defendants, 

the style of this lead case shall be as shown on this order. 

ORDERED on September 20, 2011

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 75 Filed 09/20/11 Page 1 of 1