alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of AEI Income & Growth Fund
XXII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB  for
the  period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 23, 2007



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 23, 2007
USActive 18770542.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER 

LEAGUE LIMITED, BOURNE CO. (together 

with its affiliate MURBO MUSIC PUBLISHING, 

INC.), CHERRY LANE MUSIC PUBLISHING 

COMPANY, INC., CAL IV ENTERTAINMENT 

LLC, ROBERT TUR d/b/a LOS ANGELES 

NEWS SERVICE, NATIONAL MUSIC 

PUBLISHERS’ ASSOCIATION, THE 

RODGERS & HAMMERSTEIN 

ORGANIZATION, STAGE THREE MUSIC 

(US), INC., EDWARD B. MARKS MUSIC 

COMPANY, FREDDY BIENSTOCK MUSIC 

COMPANY d/b/a BIENSTOCK PUBLISHING 

COMPANY, ALLEY MUSIC CORPORATION, 

X-RAY DOG MUSIC, INC., FÉDÉRATION 

FRANÇAISE DE TENNIS, THE MUSIC FORCE 

LLC, and SIN-DROME RECORDS, LTD. on 

behalf of themselves and all others similarly

situated,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

YOUTUBE, INC., YOUTUBE, LLC and 

GOOGLE, INC.,

Defendants.

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

:

:

:

:

:

: 

:

:

:

:

:

: 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X

07 Civ. 3582 (LLS)

(related case no. 07 Civ. 2103 (LLS), 

the “Viacom action”)

ECF CASE

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, the below counsel hereby appears as additional

counsel on behalf of The Football Association Premier League, pending the prospective 

appointment of class counsel.

Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 198 Filed 03/23/2010 Page 1 of 2
USActive 18770542.1 -2-

Dated: New York, New York

March 23, 2010

CADWALADER, WICKERSHAM & TAFT LLP

By /s/ Colin A. Underwood

Colin A. Underwood 

One World Financial Center

New York, New York 10281

Telephone: (212) 504-6000

Facsimile: (212) 504-6666

E-mail: colin.underwood@cwt.com

Co-Counsel for Lead Plaintiff

The Football Association Premier 

League Limited

Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS Document 198 Filed 03/23/2010 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended Sept. 30, 2008 of Matches, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Darren HolmDarren HolmChief Executive Officer/s/ Darren HolmDarren HolmChief Financial OfficerDated: October 20, 2008   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Matches, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the annual report of One eCommerce Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Welch, Principal Executive Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.


Date: November 15, 2010/s/ John WelchJohn WelchPrincipal Executive Officer A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED FIRE AND CASUALTY

COMPANY

VS CASE NO. 5:10CV199-RS-EMT

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

JUDGMENT

This action came before the Court with the Honorable Richard Smoak presiding.

Pursuant to Order (Doc. 33), granting Defendant WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION’s

Motion for Summary Judgment, judgment is entered for Defendant WHIRLPOOL

CORPORATION against Plaintiff. 

 September 22, 2011

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

s/ Jeremy Wright

DATE Deputy Clerk: Jeremy Wright

Case 5:10-cv-00199-RS-EMT Document 34 Filed 09/22/11 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 PENSACOLA DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. Case Nos.: 3:01cr78/LAC/CJK 

 3:16cv300/LAC/CJK 

 

HORACE VONCHE JORDAN, 

 Defendant. 

______________________________/ 

ORDER 

 This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and 

Recommendation dated September 28, 2017 (doc. 259). The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections 

thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

 1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order. 

 2. Defendant’s Corrected Motion to Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 
Page 2 of 2

Case Nos.: 3:01cr78/LAC/CJK; 3:16cv300/LAC/CJK 

§ 2255, ECF No. 240, is DENIED to the extent he seeks relief based on the Supreme

Court’s decision in Johnson and otherwise DISMISSED as untimely. 

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of October, 2017. 

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.:1:10-CV-207-SPM/GRJ

DAVID MORGAN, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (doc. 36) and Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Defendants Walter Graham, Jennifer Graham,

Steven Finlay, and Karaoke-Plus are hereby dismissed with prejudice and

Defendant Michael Davis is hereby dismissed without prejudice. 

DONE and ORDERED this twenty-fifth day of March, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
|   | (1) | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 16, 2011 | By:                                                    | /s/ Christopher Lombardi |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|               |                                                             |
|               | Christopher Lombardi                                             |
|               | Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Director |

----
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cr71-SPM

CALIXTE SIMEON,

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Count Two of this indictment. The

district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing Defendant's proposed

change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a report and recommendation

as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties consented to this procedure, and

the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the
Page 2 of 3

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:10cr71-SPM
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on December 13, 2010. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:10cr71-SPM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BILL NORKUNAS, Individually, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-470/RS-MD

SANDESTIN INVESTMENTS INC.,

a Foreign Corporation; and 

INTRAWEST HOSPITALITY

MGMT INC., a foreign corporation, 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are Defendant Sandestin Investment’s Motion to Withdraw (Doc. 28)

and Notice of Appearance (Doc. 22). 

It is ordered that Stanley A. Bunner, Jr., and Salvatori, Wood & Buckel, P.L., are

granted leave to withdraw as attorneys of record for Defendant Sandestin Investments 

Inc. Ralph A. Peterson, and Beggs & Lane RLLP, are substituted as attorneys of record 

for Defendant Sandestin Investments Inc.

ORDERED on January 3, 2011

/S/ Richard Smoak

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2010230EN.01000701.xml

| 26.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 August 2010

2010/C 230/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2613 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4475 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81850 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4710 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2994 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0165 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,920 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 284,35 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7084 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0070 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2405 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9318 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4349 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3449 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8098 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8101 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7169 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 509,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3234 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5751 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2770 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 329,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9650 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,105 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,0290 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,715 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2324 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4500 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,1500 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2613

JPY

Japanese yen

106,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4475

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81850

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4710

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2994

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0165

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,920

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

284,35

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7084

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0070

RON

Romanian leu

4,2405

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9318

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4349

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3449

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8098

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8101

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7169

KRW

South Korean won

1 509,33

ZAR

South African rand

9,3234

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5751

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2770

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 329,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9650

PHP

Philippine peso

57,105

RUB

Russian rouble

39,0290

THB

Thai baht

39,715

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2324

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4500

INR

Indian rupee

59,1500

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2009281EN.01001001.xml

| 21.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/10

---

Information of the Member States according to Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

2009/C 281/06

The following Member States have informed the Commission according to Article 1(3) of Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on the inland transport of dangerous goods that they have decided not to apply the provisions of Annex III, Section III.1 (ADN), to the abovementioned Directive:

| — | Kingdom of Denmark |
| --- | --- |

—

Kingdom of Denmark

| — | Republic of Estonia |
| --- | --- |

—

Republic of Estonia

| — | Ireland |
| --- | --- |

—

Ireland

| — | Hellenic Republic |
| --- | --- |

—

Hellenic Republic

| — | Kingdom of Spain |
| --- | --- |

—

Kingdom of Spain

| — | Republic of Cyprus |
| --- | --- |

—

Republic of Cyprus

| — | Republic of Latvia |
| --- | --- |

—

Republic of Latvia

| — | Republic of Lithuania |
| --- | --- |

—

Republic of Lithuania

| — | Republic of Malta |
| --- | --- |

—

Republic of Malta

| — | Portuguese Republic |
| --- | --- |

—

Portuguese Republic

| — | Republic of Slovenia |
| --- | --- |

—

Republic of Slovenia

| — | Slovak Republic |
| --- | --- |

—

Slovak Republic

| — | Republic of Finland |
| --- | --- |

—

Republic of Finland

| — | Kingdom of Sweden |
| --- | --- |

—

Kingdom of Sweden

| — | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| --- | --- |

—

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RUFUS S. MILLER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-276-RS-GRJ

SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

__________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 20, Petitioner’s Motion For Extension of

Time to file a reply. As further relief in the motion Petitioner requests the Court to enter

an order compelling Respondent to provide him with copies of the exhibits to the

Respondent’s response. Petitioner contends that there are in excess of 200 pages of

exhibits in the Response, which he did not receive as part of the Response 

Petitioner has failed to identify any parts of the state court record that are not

already in his possession. Furthermore, it is apparent that Petitioner has at least

certain portions of the state court record in his possession in that the record was

necessary to the preparation of the Petition. See Doc. 1 and attached exhibits. 

Because Petitioner does not identify with any specificity which of the records he does

not have that are necessary to formulate a Reply and fails to provide any grounds in

support of his request, the Court concludes that Petitioner’s motion for production of

exhibits is not well-taken. Accordingly, the motion is due to be denied without prejudice

to the filing of a motion demonstrating Petitioner’s need for additional portions of the

record. See Rule 6(b), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases (authorizing discovery in

Case 5:10-cv-00276-MW-GRJ Document 21 Filed 06/24/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

habeas cases upon a showing of “good cause;” such discovery may include the

production of documents that the requesting party specifies). Petitioner will also be

afforded additional time to reply to the Respondent’s response. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s request for production of exhibits is DENIED, without prejudice to

Petitioner’s right to request the production of additional state court records upon

a proper showing.

2. Petitioner’s request for an extension of time is GRANTED. Petitioner shall

have until August 22, 2011, to file any reply to the response.

 

DONE AND ORDERED this 24 day of June 2011.

th

 

s/ Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 5:10-cv-276-RS-GRJ

Case 5:10-cv-00276-MW-GRJ Document 21 Filed 06/24/11 Page 2 of 2
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Fraser Cottington                                          |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Fraser Cottington                                                    |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  May 10, 2010                                                         |
1

John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by

assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003). 

NO. 07-03-0172-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

JUNE 6, 2003

______________________________

JIMMY BARELA,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 45,848-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING

_______________________________

Before QUINN and CAMPBELL, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant Jimmy Barela appeals from a judgment convicting him of assault on a

public servant. The clerk’s record is due in this cause, and an extension of the applicable

deadline was sought. To justify the extension, the district clerk represented that appellant

has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay for the record. Nothing of record appears

showing the appellant is indigent and entitled to a free record. 
2

Accordingly, we now abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 320th District

Court of Potter County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court

shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing

to determine the following: 

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 

 2. whether appellant is indigent; and,

3. whether the appellant is entitled to a free appellate record and to

appointed counsel on appeal due to his indigency.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. So too shall it 1) execute findings

of fact and conclusions of law addressing the foregoing issues, 2) cause to be developed

a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions of law and all

orders it may issue as a result of its hearing on this matter, and 3) cause to be developed

a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and arguments presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the district court shall then file the supplemental

record with the clerk of this court on or before July 3, 2003. Should further time be needed

by the trial court to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before July 3, 2003.

 Finally, if the trial court determines that appellant is entitled to appointed counsel and has

no counsel, it must appoint counsel to appellant and inform this court of the name,

address, and state bar number of the appointed counsel.

It is so ordered. 

 Per Curiam 

Do not publish.