alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which                           ( print page 64660)                        would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Fellowship Applications.                    

*Date:*                         December 12, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3045, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Philippe Marmillot, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse, and Alcoholism, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3045, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-443-2861, marmillotp@mail.nih.gov.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 7, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5676 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Real Goods Solar, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Schaeffer, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 6, 2010



/s/ John SchaefferJohn SchaefferPresident (principal executive
officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

BEN JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No. 1:10cv197-SPM/GRJ

GIOVE LAW OFFICE, P.C.,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case has been dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Plaintiff’s Notice

of Voluntary Dismissal (doc. 9) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(a)(1)(A)(i). Accordingly, the clerk shall close this case.

SO ORDERED this 6th day of February, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00197-SPM-GRJ Document 10 Filed 02/06/12 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011060EN.01000901.xml

| 25.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6071 — Ineos/Ineos Nova)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 60/04

On 16 February 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6071. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6071. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2148 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2148

   To amend the Small Business Act to provide additional awards for 
               disaster recovery, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2019

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Small Business Act to provide additional awards for 
               disaster recovery, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Disaster Recovery 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL AWARDS FOR DISASTER RECOVERY.

    Section 7(b)(12) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(b)(12)) 
is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``may'' and inserting 
        ``shall''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(I) Award amount.--
                            ``(i) In general.--The total amount of 
                        financial assistance provided under this 
                        paragraph in a fiscal year shall be in an 
                        amount that is not less than 3 percent and not 
                        more than 5 percent of the total amount made 
                        available for that fiscal year for 
                        administrative expenses to carry out the 
                        disaster loan program under this subsection, 
                        including amounts made available as emergency 
                        supplemental appropriations.
                            ``(ii) Remainder.--Any financial assistance 
                        allocated to an entity under clause (i) that 
                        remains unobligated by the end of the fiscal 
                        year in which the financial assistance is made 
                        available shall be reallocated to the 
                        Administrator to provide loans under this 
                        subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 11.1 EFJ, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)  2002
  
  2001
  
  2000Net income (loss)
  
  $
  1,410
  
  $
  544
  
  $
  (25,386
  )Net income (loss) per shareBasic:Weighted average common
  sharesBasic
  
  17,577,315
  
  16,617,426
  
  13,511,489Net income (loss) per
  shareBasic
  
  $
  0.08
  
  $
  0.03
  
  $
  (1.88
  )Net income (loss) per shareDiluted:Shares used in this computation:Weighted average common sharesBasic
  
  17,577,315
  
  16,617,426
  
  13,511,489Dilutive effect of shares
  under employee stock plans
  
  431,181
  
  
  
  Weighted average common sharesDiluted
  
  18,008,496
  
  16,617,426
  
  13,511,489Net income (loss) per shareDiluted
  
  $
  0.08
  
  $
  0.03
  
  $
  (1.88
  )  
 Note:      Common stock equivalents
were not included for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, as their
effect would be anti-dilutive.


---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-116930,No. 333-107525, No. 333-90045, No. 333-77943, No. 333-33038, No. 333-39396, No. 333-67692, and No. 333-70334) of Autobytel Inc. of our report dated March 16, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements,financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Irvine, CA 

March 16, 2006
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TYRONE RAHMINGS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv240/RS/MD

WARDEN D. ELLIS, et al.,

Defendants.

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon plaintiff filing a Motion for Court Ordered

Assistance to Serve Interrogatories (doc. 1) and a Motion for Order Authorizing Deposition

to Perpetuate Testimony (doc. 2). Plaintiff states he has not yet commenced a civil rights

action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the persons from whom he seeks discovery,

because he “cannot presently bring it or cause it to be brought.” (Doc. 2, p. 2). 

Nonetheless, he wants to start conducting discovery and seeks the court’s assistance.

Plaintiff is advised that until he files a complaint under § 1983, the complaint is

served on the named defendants, and the court has ordered discovery, discovery is

premature. Therefore, the court will deny plaintiff’s motions at this time, but will provide

him the opportunity to file a complaint. The complaint must be submitted on the court form.

N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.1(J) (stating that the court will not accept for consideration a pro se

complaint filed under § 1983 unless the appropriate complaint form is completed, signed

and filed). In addition, plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee or apply for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis. A complete application to proceed in forma pauperis includes

a motion with supporting affidavit, a prisoner consent form and a financial certificate with

attachments (a printout of the transactions in plaintiff’s inmate trust account for the six-
Page 2 of 2

month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint). Plaintiff’s case cannot

proceed unless all these forms are submitted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s motions for assistance in conducting discovery (docs. 1, 2) are DENIED

without prejudice as premature.

2. The clerk is directed to send plaintiff a § 1983 complaint form and a form

application to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on the forms.

3. Within twenty-eight (28) days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a

complaint which shall be typed or clearly written, and submitted on the court form.

4. Within the same time period, plaintiff shall either submit payment in the amount

of $350.00, or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis.

5. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order as instructed will result in a

recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply

with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2010.

/s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 5:10cv240/RS/MD
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 12

Prime Succession, Inc. and subsidiaries
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 SUCCESSOR COMPANY                          PREDECESSOR COMPANY

                                                                            PERIOD         PERIOD
                                                                             FROM           FROM
                                                                            AUG. 26        JAN. 1
                                                                            THROUGH        THROUGH
                                                                           DEC. 31,       AUG. 25,
                                  1999           1998          1997          1996           1996           1995
                                  ----           ----          ----          ----           ----           ----
<S>                               <C>            <C>           <C>         <C>            <C>              <C>
Ratio of
Earnings
 to Fixed
 Charges

Earnings:

  Income (Loss)
 before income
 taxes                              (16,375)       (6,600)           280       (3,145)        (9,111)          (355)

  Add: Fixed
 charges, net                         25,640        25,194        24,716         8,884         10,691         16,224

Income before
 income taxes
 and fixed
 charges, net                          9,265        18,594        24,996         5,739          1,580         15,869

Fixed Charges:
  Total interest
 expense (1)                          24,604        24,195        23,843         8,540         10,059         15,401

  Interest factor
 in rents (2)                          1,036           999           873           344            632            823

Total fixed
 charges                              25,640        25,194        24,716         8,884         10,691         16,224

Ratio of
 earnings to
 fixed charges                           0.4           0.7           1.0           0.6            0.1            1.0

Coverage
 deficiency
 (surplus) (3)                        16,375         6,600         (280)         3,145          9,111            355
</TABLE>

<PAGE>   2
(1)  Total interest expense for each period includes amortization of loan costs.

(2)  Interest factor in rents represents one-third of rent expense, which is
     considered representative of the interest factor.

(3)  The Company's earnings are inadequate to cover fixed charges for all
     periods except 1997 indicated above. Coverage deficiency represents the
     excess of fixed charges over income before income taxes and fixed charges,
     net. Coverage surplus represents excess income before income taxes and
     fixed charges, net over fixed charges.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

EDWARD ALOYSIUS RZEWNICKI, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10131 

D.C. No. 

4:14-cr-01155-RCC-BGM-1 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 13, 2017

San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL,** District 

Judge.

Edward Rzewnicki appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of 

firearms and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). 

He asserts that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel, United States District Judge for the 

Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

FILED

JUL 28 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-10131 

indictment. The motion was based on his claim that he reasonably believed that the 

order discharging him from probation on the predicate felony conviction had 

restored his right to possess firearms, and that the indictment therefore violated the 

“anti-mousetrapping” rule of 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20).

Rzewnicki argued that he was a first offender as defined by Arizona law and 

thus was statutorily entitled to automatic restoration of his civil rights upon 

discharge from probation. Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 13-912(A). Rzewnicki’s 2005 

conviction involved three separate felony counts. Under controlling Arizona 

authority, the automatic restoration provision of Arizona Revised Statutes § 13-

912(A) applies only to offenders who have been convicted of a single felony. 

Rocking K Holdings, Ltd. v. Pima County, 822 P.2d 487, 489 (Ariz. Ct. App. 

1991). Accordingly, the district court correctly denied the motion to dismiss.

AFFIRMED.
Order entered August 28, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01148-CV

IN RE M&A TEXAS LANCASTER, LTD., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-06438

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER that relator pay the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TAMMY WHITE,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-230/RS-GRJ

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP., 

d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE

Defendant. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

Before me is Defendant’s Notice of Withdrawal as Counsel (Doc. 37) and Notice 

of Appearance (Doc. 25) which shall be construed as a motion for withdrawal and 

substitution of attorneys pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 11.1(F). 

It is ordered that Leslie M. Greenspan, and Stradley, Ronon, Stevens, & Young,

LLP, are granted leave to withdraw as attorneys of record for Defendant. Mercer K. 

Clarke and Clark, Silverglate & Campbell, P.A., are substituted as attorneys of record for 

Defendant.

ORDERED on November 18, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 14.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Statement,
  No. 333-102800, of DRDGOLD Limited on Form F-3 and Registration Statement, No. 333-121386, of DRDGOLD Limited on Form F-4 of our report dated December 15, 2005 with
  respect to the consolidated balance sheet of DRDGOLD Limited and its subsidiaries as of
  June30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations,stockholders' equity, cash flows and notes thereto for each of the years in the three-year periodended  June 30, 2005,  which  report  appears  in  the Annual Report on Form 20-F of DRDGOLDLimited for the year ended June 30, 2005.
  /s/ KPMG Inc KPMG Inc Registered Accountants and Auditors Chartered Accountants (SA) Johannesburg, Republic of South Africa December 15, 2005
# C_2009029EN.01001701.xml

| 5.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/17

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 February 2009

(2009/C 29/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2818 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,28 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4514 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,8901 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6693 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4896 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,892 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,38 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,5 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,702 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,674 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,305 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1074 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 2,0006 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5928 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9394 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,5325 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9351 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 774,08 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,9327 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7598 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3872 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 061,15 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6484 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,35 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 46,527 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,778 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9618 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6886 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,257 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2818

JPY

Japanese yen

114,28

DKK

Danish krone

7,4514

GBP

Pound sterling

0,8901

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6693

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4896

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,892

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

28,38

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,5

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,702

PLN

Polish zloty

4,674

RON

Romanian leu

4,305

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1074

AUD

Australian dollar

2,0006

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5928

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9394

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,5325

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9351

KRW

South Korean won

1 774,08

ZAR

South African rand

12,9327

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7598

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3872

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 061,15

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6484

PHP

Philippine peso

60,35

RUB

Russian rouble

46,527

THB

Thai baht

44,778

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9618

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6886

INR

Indian rupee

62,257

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### TEXFI INDUSTRIES v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE

No. 14 PC.

No. 126 (Spring Term 1980).

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 268.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 1 April 1980. Motion of defendants to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 1 April 1980. Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 April 1980.