alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00162-MP -GRJ

2005 FORD F-350 TRUCK VIN 1FTWW33P45EB39321,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Previously, the Court entered an order at Doc. 18, in response to the claimant, Domingo

Jimenez’s, motion to compel. In the Order, the Court required claimant to clarify its Motion to

Compel by including “a copy of the Requests for Production,” and a description of “the degree

of compliance by the government and the dates thereof.” Claimant responded with Doc. 19,

Report of Plaintiff’s Compliance with Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery. The

government responded at Doc. 20. Also pending is Doc. 22, a motion by the government for a

formal order sending this matter to mediation, which is required under government procedures. 

That motion is granted, and the parties are ordered to mediate this case.1

In Doc. 19, claimant describes the government’s degree of compliance2 by stating that the

1

The Court notes that in Doc. 21, the parties indicated that mediation is set for June 2,

2011. 

2

 In Doc. 19, claimant failed to produce either a copy of the Requests for Production or a

description of the dates of compliance by the government. The Court still does not know the date

on which the government provided claimant with the five documents listed at Doc. 17. Thus, the

Court assumes that claimant waives any argument that the government violated Fed. R. Civ. P.

37(a)(5)(A) by failing to produce anything on or before the filing date of claimant’s Motion to

Compel.

Case 1:10-cv-00162-MP-GRJ Document 23 Filed 05/24/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

government “produced a total of 48 pages of documents,” but complained that many were

“redacted by way of ‘blacking out.’” Particularly, claimant argued that the investigative report

and the vehicle impoundment report were blacked out even though they would appear to contain

relevant information. In Doc. 20, the government responded as if claimant’s motion to compel

only involved two pages that were redacted only to remove “personal identifiers” including

“names of co-defendants, dates of birth, social security numbers, and addresses.”

In order to evaluate whether the redactions were appropriate, the Court must review the

documents in their original form. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The government shall therefore provide an un-redacted copy of the 48 pages of

documents to the Court, under seal, by May 31, 2011.

The motion for an order of mediation, Doc. 22, is granted, and the parties are ordered to

mediate this case at a time, place and before a mediator of their choosing.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00162-MP -GRJ

Case 1:10-cv-00162-MP-GRJ Document 23 Filed 05/24/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DERRICK JORDAN,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv98/RS-EMT

UNKNOWN OFFICER, et al,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report And Recommendation (Doc. 11). 

Plaintiff has not filed objections. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report And Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice because of Plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an Order of the court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on September 21, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

BEAUMONT DIVISION

TANESHA BOLAR §

VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-475

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA §

MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING TRANSFER

Petitioner Tanesha Bolar, a federal prisoner confined in Tallahassee, Florida, proceeding pro

se, brings this petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The above-styled action was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636 and the Local Rulesfor the Assignment of Dutiesto the United States Magistrate Judge

for findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Discussion

To entertain a habeas petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the district court must have

jurisdiction over the prisoner. United States v. Gabor, 905 F.2d 76, 77-78 (5th Cir. 1990).

Accordingly, a prisoner must file a Section 2241 petition in the district where he is incarcerated. Id.

at 78. If the petitioner files in another district, that court lacks jurisdiction over the petition. Id.;

United States v. Brown, 753 F.2d 455 (5th Cir. 1985).

After reviewing the pleadings, the court has concluded that jurisdiction is not proper in the

Eastern District of Texas because the petitioner is not incarcerated here. Although this court lacks

jurisdiction to hear the petition, Title 28 U.S.C. § 1631 permits the court to transfer the action, in the

interest of justice, to any other court where the action could have been brought. 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

Case 4:09-cv-00309-RH-WCS Document 3 Filed 07/07/09 Page 1 of 2
2

 The court has considered the circumstances and has determined that the interest of justice

would best be served if the petition were transferred to the division where petitioner is incarcerated.

Accordingly, this petition for writ of habeas corpus should be transferred to the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Florida. An order transferring the petition will be entered in

accordance with this Memorandum Opinion.

SIGNED this day of , 2009.

 

 KEITH F. GIBLIN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 Hello This is a Test

7 July

Case 4:09-cv-00309-RH-WCS Document 3 Filed 07/07/09 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-18 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 21 of 21
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,      2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                          |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MD      Holdings Corp. |

|                            | MD      Holdings, Corp. |
|---------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                            |                    |
| Date:      August 8, 2008  | By:           | /s/      Marshall Davis |
|                            |                    | Marshall      Davis |
|                            |                    | Chief      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Director and Principal      AccountingOfficer  |
Page 1 of 2

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ELENA T. CONE WOHLFORD, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 4:09cv348-RH/WCS 

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Defendant. 

_______________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the Clerk. Pending is Plaintiff’s

complaint for judicial review of the adverse administrative decision of the defendant. 

Doc. 1. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis was granted in this court’s order entered

September 9, 2009, and the Clerk was directed to issue summons to the Plaintiff who

was advised that she was responsible for service of the complaint within 120 days. 

Doc. 4. Plaintiff was also advised that she could request that the Marshal serve her

complaint. Id.

Because no activity had occurred in this case for a period of 90 days, an order

was entered on December 12, 2009, directing the Plaintiff to advise the court within 15

days the status of service. Doc. 6. On December 8, 2009, Plaintiff’s copy of that order

was returned undelivered to the clerk with a notation on the envelope: "return to

sender, attempted - not known - unable to forward." Doc. 7. The envelope was sent to
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:09cv348-RH/WCS

the Tallahassee address provided by Plaintiff in her complaint. Doc. 1. Plaintiff has not

notified the court of a new address. 

It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this lawsuit and to keep the court

apprised of any change in address, and the complaint should be dismissed without

prejudice for failure to prosecute. Since Plaintiff has not furnished the court with a new

address, it is doubtful that she will even receive a copy of this report and

recommendation. In the event the Plaintiff does receive a copy of this report and

recommendation, the court will allow her an opportunity to show cause why this report

and recommendation should be vacated, failing which, the Clerk shall be directed to

forward the report and recommendation to the assigned district judge.

It is recognized that dismissal in this case will effectively be with prejudice as

there is a short period of time in which to file for review in this court from an adverse

Social Security decision and the time for refiling this complaint has expired. 

Nonetheless, there is no alternative as Plaintiff cannot be located. 

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. 

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on December 31, 2009.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings

and recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this

report and recommendation. A party may respond to another party's

objections within 14 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to

file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual

findings and recommendations.
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer   I, Joel Stohlman, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: August 19, 2009  /s/ Joel Stohlman Joel Stohlman Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ROBERT MEYER, Individually

and On Behalf of All Others 

Similarly Situated,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-27/RS-EMT

THE ST. JOE COMPANY, 

et al., 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. Defendants shall answer, move against, or otherwise respond to the First Amended 

Consolidated Class Action Complaint (Doc. 101) not later than October 17, 2011. 

2. If any Defendant moves to dismiss the amended complaint, the following 

scheduled shall apply:

a. The lead plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of the motion is 

served to serve opposition papers; and

b. The moving Defendant(s) shall have 14 days from the date the lead 

plaintiff serves opposition papers to serve a reply brief, if any, in further 

support of the moving Defendant(s)’ respective motion(s). 

Case 5:11-cv-00027-RS-EMT Document 102 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED on September 27, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00027-RS-EMT Document 102 Filed 09/27/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2010099EN.01000701.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 April 2010

2010/C 99/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3535 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,30 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4424 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87710 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6870 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4338 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9550 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,178 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 263,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7081 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8743 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1463 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9968 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4519 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3567 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5062 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8973 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8568 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 502,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9699 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2383 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2605 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 194,89 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3177 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,070 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,2950 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,644 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3670 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4924 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,9800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3535

JPY

Japanese yen

125,30

DKK

Danish krone

7,4424

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87710

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6870

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4338

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9550

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,178

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

263,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7081

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8743

RON

Romanian leu

4,1463

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9968

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4519

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3567

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5062

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8973

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8568

KRW

South Korean won

1 502,86

ZAR

South African rand

9,9699

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2383

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2605

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 194,89

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3177

PHP

Philippine peso

60,070

RUB

Russian rouble

39,2950

THB

Thai baht

43,644

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3670

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4924

INR

Indian rupee

59,9800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 32

<PAGE>


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Imagine  Media,  Ltd.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  Gregory A.  Bloom,  the
Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


May 20, 2011                           By: /s/ Gregory A. Bloom
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Gregory A. Bloom, Principal Executive
                                             and Financial Officer
# C_2010047EN.01002101.xml

| 25.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/21

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 February 2010

2010/C 47/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3547 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4427 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87750 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7850 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4641 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0290 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,880 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9926 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1260 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0958 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5191 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4306 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5185 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9588 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9099 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 559,43 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5358 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2485 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2699 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 616,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6107 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,532 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,6900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,753 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4680 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4655 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,6990 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3547

JPY

Japanese yen

122,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4427

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87750

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7850

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4641

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0290

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,880

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9926

RON

Romanian leu

4,1260

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0958

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5191

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4306

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5185

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9588

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9099

KRW

South Korean won

1 559,43

ZAR

South African rand

10,5358

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2485

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2699

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 616,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6107

PHP

Philippine peso

62,532

RUB

Russian rouble

40,6900

THB

Thai baht

44,753

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4680

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4655

INR

Indian rupee

62,6990

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-20549, No. 333-65459, No. 333-38568, No.333-88836 and No. 333-107645 of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. on Form S-8, Registration Statements No. 333-81384 and 333-107633 of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. on Form S-3, and Registration Statement No. 333-112182 of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. onForm S-4 of our report dated February 12, 2004 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets during 2002), appearing in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 28, 2003. 

 

/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Costa Mesa, California 

February 12, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Navidec, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), John R.
McKowen, as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of his knowledge and belief, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





John R. McKowen
Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
April 11, 2004