alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

CASE NO. 09-22930-CIV-SEITZ IO'SULLIVAN 

MICHAEL LITTLE, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, 

Respondent. 

1 

ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [DE-51 of the Honorable 

Patrick A. White, Magistrate Judge, to which no party has filed an objection. Judge White recommends that 

the Court transferring the action to the Northern District of Florida as the Petitioner is confined in that 

District and the petition does not attack the validity of conviction. Having reviewed the Recommendation, 

and there being no objection thereto', it is hereby 

ORDERED that 

(1) Judge White's Report and Recommendation [DE-51 is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. 

(2) The Clerk of the Court shall TRANSFER this case in its entirety to the Northern District 

of Florida. 

(3) This case is CLOSED. 

7L 

DONE AND ORDERED in Miami, Florida, this 17 day of Aprjl, 2910. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

cc: 

Magistrate Judge White 

Counsel of RecordIPro se parties 

' Petitioner filed a document docketed as an objection to the Report & Recommendation, but Petitioner 

submitted the filing five days before the entry of the Report and the filing does not address transfer issue discussed in 

the Report.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of BPZ Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Manuel Pablo Zuniga-Pflucker, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| */s/ Manuel Pablo Zuniga-Pflucker*    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Manuel Pablo Zuniga-Pflucker          |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                  |
| December 23, 2005                |   |

 

1

----
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-10959 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. TREMON TRAVELL BROWN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court f or the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:02-CR-94-18

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Tremon Travell B rown, federal prisoner # 28757-177, appeals the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3 582(c)(2) m o tion to reduce his sentence. Brown pleaded guilty to conspiracy t o d istri b u t e a n d possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of cocaine base, and he was sentenced to 293 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release. He contends t h a t h e is eligible for a s entence reduction u nder A mendment 750, which implemented t he Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA) and revised the Sentencing Guidelines applicable to offenses U n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 21, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-10959 Document: 00512283100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2013No. 12-10959

involving cocaine base. B rown has filed a motion for leave to f ile an out-of-time reply brief, and that motion is granted. We review the d i s t r ict court’s resolution of a § 3582(c)(2) motion for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Cooley , 5 9 0 F

. 3 d 293, 295-96 (5th Cir. 2009). Bro w n a r gues that, when considering whether to afford him relief, the district court erred in c onsidering his three post-convict i o n d isciplinary infractions because it had considered those infractions w hen it denied an earlier filed motion for reli e f u n der § 3582(c)(2). The court w as allowed to consider those i n fractions. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10, comment. (n.1(B)(iii)); Unit e d States v. Smith , 595 F.3d 1322, 1323 (5th Cir. 2010). Brown’s contention t h at he is entitled to a reduction in light of t h e FSA, which took effect after he was sentenced, i s without merit. See Dorsey v. United States , 132 S. Ct. 2321, 2335-36 (2012); United S tates v. Doggins, 633 F.3d 379, 384 (5th Cir. 2011). The record shows that the district court g ave due consideration to Brown’s motion as a whole and that it considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) factors. Accordingly, the denial of Brown’s § 3 582(c)(2) motion was n ot an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Whitebird , 55 F.3d 1007, 1010 (5th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-10959 Document: 00512283100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2013
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP, INC.

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
on Form S-8 of FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP, INC., relating to the First Federal
Savings Bank of America Employees Savings and Profit Sharing Plan and Trust of
our report dated April 20, 2000, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP, INC. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000
and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended March 31, 2000, which report is included in the March 31, 2000
annual report on Form 10-K of FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP, INC.

[LOGO OF KPMG LLP]
Boston, Massachusetts
June 27, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TRANSCRYPT
INTERNATIONAL, INC.'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          21,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,245
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,570
<INVENTORY>                                     16,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,202
<PP&E>                                          10,896
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,130
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,521
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,409
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,521
<SALES>                                         53,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,520
<CGS>                                           36,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,059
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,909<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (386)<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,827)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,827)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.30)
<FN>
<F1>Other expenses includes a $0.5 million restructuring charge and a $2.2 million
reversal of a special provision taken during 1998 for the potential settlement
of pending class action lawsuits.
<F2>Interest expenxe is net of $920 of Interest Income less $534 of Interest
expense.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aden Solutions Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Silvia Soltan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 16th day of May, 2011.



| | SILVIA SOLTAN                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Silvia Soltan,                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

















A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Aden Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Aden Solutions Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 73, Number 3 (Friday, January 4, 2008)]
[Notices]
[Page 932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6278]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: ULLICO Casualty 
Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 5 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2007 Revision, published July 2, 2007, at 72 FR 36192.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following company: ULLICO Casualty Company (NAIC <greek-i> 37893). 
Business Address: 1625 Eye St., NW., Washington DC 20006. Phone: (202) 
682-4992. Underwriting Limitation b/: $5,819,000. Surety Licenses c/: 
AL, AK, AZ, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, DC, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, IA, KS, KY, 
LA, MD, MA, MI, MN, MS, MO, MT, NE, NV, NJ, NM, NY, NC, ND, OH, OK, OR, 
PA, PR, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, VA, VI, WA, WV, WI, WY. Incorporated 
In: Delaware. Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their 
reference copies of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2007 
Revision, to reflect this addition.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (see 31 CFR 
part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of 
July 1 in the Circular, which outlines details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety 
business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

    Dated: December 21, 2007.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.
[FR Doc. 07-6278 Filed 1-3-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
# C_2010076EN.01004301.xml

| 25.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 76/43

---

Corrigendum to the reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AST/75/08 — Social Welfare Assistants (AST 3)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 61 A of 12 March 2010
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 61 A of 12 March 2010

2010/C 76/18

On page 16, ‘Merit Group 4’, third name:

for:

| ‘DE GENNARO L | uca’, |
| --- | --- |

‘DE GENNARO L

uca’,

read:

| ‘DE GENNARO | Luca’. |
| --- | --- |

‘DE GENNARO

Luca’.

---
Exhibit 32(k)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,



|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.







|/s/ Roderick K. WestRoderick K. West
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	August 7, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Durban Roodepoort
Deep, Limited (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Mark Michael Wellesley-Wood, as Executive Chairman of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

      /s/ Mark Michael Wellesley-Wood
      --------------------------------------
      By: Mark Michael Wellesley-Wood
      Title: Executive Chairman
      Date: November 15, 2004
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Matches, Inc.   (the "Company") on Form  10-Q for the  period  ending  March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Zhao Zhimeng, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May 16, 2011

/s/ Zhao Zhimeng

Zhao Zhimeng

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



|Date
|----
|
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 235 (Friday, December 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 69279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5981]



[[Page 69279]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6009]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``The Dancer: Degas, Forain, and Toulouse-Lautrec''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 Note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``The Dancer: Degas, Forain, and Toulouse-
Lautrec'', imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported 
pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at 
the Portland Art Museum, from on or about February 2, 2008, until on or 
about May 11, 2008, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of 
these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/453-8048). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: December 3, 2007.
C. Miller Crouch,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 07-5981 Filed 12-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-M
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

EDWARD ALOYSIUS RZEWNICKI,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 16

- 10131

D.C. No.

4:14

- cr

- 01155

- RCC

- BGM

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 13, 2017

San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL, ** District

Judge.

Edward Rzewnicki appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of

firearms and ammunition, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2).

He asserts that the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel, United States District Judge for the

Northern District of California, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

JUL 28 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 10131

indi ctment. The motion was based on his claim that he reasonably believed that the

order discharging him from probation on the predicate felony conviction had

restored his right to possess firearms, and that the indictment therefore violated the

“anti

- mousetra pping” rule of 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20).

Rzewnicki argued that he was a first offender as defined by Arizona law and

thus was statutorily entitled to automatic restoration of his civil rights upon

discharge from probation. A riz

. R ev

. S tat . § 13

- 912 (A). Rz ewnicki’s 2005

conviction involved three separate felony counts. Under controlling Arizona

authority, the automatic restoration provision of Arizona Revised Statutes § 13

-

912(A) applies only to offenders who have been convicted of a single felony.

Rockin g K Holdings, Ltd. v. Pima County

, 822 P.2d 487, 489 (Ariz. Ct. App.

1991). Accordingly, the district court correctly denied the motion to dismiss.

AFFIRMED.
#### FEIBUS & CO., INC. v. CONSTRUCTION CO.

No. 188 PC.

No. 110 (Spring Term).

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 133.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 March 1980.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 01-7775



# 
G ARRY J ERMAINE P URVIS ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge.

(CR-99-164) Submitted: December 11, 2001 Decided: February 25, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSELGarry Jermaine Purvis, Appellant Pro Se. William Earl Day, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Garry Jermaine Purvis appeals from an order of the district court denying his motion to compel the government to file a motion for a downward departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K1.1, p.s. (2000). Purvis was sentenced in September 1999. His pro se motion to compel a § 5K1.1 motion was filed in August 2001, after the government’s time to file either a § 5K1.1 motion or a motion to reduce Purvis’ sentence under Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure had expired. Moreover, our review of the record reveals that Purvis sought to compel a § 5K1.1 motion at sentencing and the government explained that his assistance had notbeen substantial. Purvis’ plea agreement did not obligate the government to request a departure unless it deemed his assistance to be substantial, and Purvis has made no showing that the government’s refusal to move for a departure was based on an unconstitutional motive or unrelated to a legitimate government purpose. See Wade v. United States , 504 U.S. 181, 186 (1992). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. P URVIS