alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Moody 10-Q





EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Moody National REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certifies, to his knowledge, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: August 16, 2010





/s/ Robert W. EngelRobert W. EngelChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-25-1998
<CASH>                                       3,962,065
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,397,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                    61,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,874,352
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,341,118
<PP&E>                                       3,222,433
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,228,168
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,964,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,132,378
<BONDS>                                      5,188,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,598,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,964,495
<SALES>                                     38,655,609
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,655,609
<CGS>                                       25,823,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,627,824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (848,836)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (60,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (788,836)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.17)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

VERNA CONNORS and GORDON

VAUGHN,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv266/RS-GRJ

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT;

CIA; STATE OF FLORIDA; FEDERAL

BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; BAY

COUNTY; PANAMA CITY HALL; and

PANAMA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 11)

and Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal (Doc. 12), which shall be construed as objections. I

have considered Plaintiff’s objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion For Leave To Proceed (Doc. 2) is denied.

3. This case is dismissed as frivolous and for failure to state a claim for

relief.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.
ORDERED on January 6, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 13, 2023.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 13, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0156. DEE KLINE v. KAY GREENSTEIN.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2021CV356184
Case 1:07-cv-03579-LTS-MHD Document 2 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03579-LTS-MHD Document 2 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages F-3 and F-4 of the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             270
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   270     
<PP&E>                                               0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     495     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                         269 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       495   
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,106)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CAROLYN STROMAS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv381/LAC/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of the 

Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This action was initiated under the Social Security Act to obtain judicial review of

Defendant’s final decision denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits (Doc. 1). Now before the

court is Defendant’s Motion to Remand pursuant to sentence four of Title 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (Doc.

10). Defendant has certified that Plaintiff has no objection to this motion (id.).

Sentence four of section 405(g) states that “[t]he court shall have power to enter, upon the

pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision

of the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.” 42

U.S.C. § 405(g). In the instant case, the Commissioner states that remand is appropriate to enable

an Administrative Law Judge to: 

further develop the record, reassess Plaintiff’s credible limitations, and issue a new

decision. In doing so, the ALJ will be directed to consider the lumbar spine MRI

dated December 8, 2009, and Dr. Richard Hooper’s February 24, 2010[,] medical

source statement.

(Doc. 10-1 at 1). Based upon the foregoing, this court concludes that good cause has been shown

for remand.
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That Defendant’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) be GRANTED and the

Commissioner’s decision denying benefits be REVERSED.

2. That this case be REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. That Defendant be ordered to conduct proceedings in accordance with this Report

and Recommendation.

4. That the clerk be directed to enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure

5. That the clerk be directed to administratively close this file. 

At Pensacola, Florida, this 28th day of March 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

 ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A copy of

objections shall be served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object

may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States

v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No.: 3:08cv66/LAC/EMT
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2460 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2460

   To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to modify a 
            provision relating to acquisition of beach fill.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2019

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 to modify a 
            provision relating to acquisition of beach fill.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sand Acquisition, Nourishment, and 
Development Act'' or the ``SAND Act''.

SEC. 2. ACQUISITION OF BEACH FILL.

    Section 935 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2299) is amended by striking ``if such materials are not 
available from domestic sources for environmental or economic 
reasons''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1

[LETTERHEAD OF WAKEFIELD QUIN]

We hereby consent to the use of our name and opinion referenced in Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Glengarry Holdings Limited dated July
24, 2002, including any future amendments thereof, which appears under the section entitled, "Risk Factors  Unenforceability of Certain United States Judgments  We are
Incorporated in Bermuda, and, as a Result, it may not be Possible for Shareholders to Enforce Civil Liability Provisions of Securities Laws of the United States."

/s/
Wakefield Quin
Wakefield Quin
Hamilton, Bermuda
July 24, 2002

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 23


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
Manchester Technologies, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration  statement (No.
333-71255)  on Form S-8 of  Manchester  Technologies,  Inc. of our report  dated
October 13, 2004,  relating to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of  Manchester
Technologies,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  as of July 31,  2004 and  2003,  and the
related  consolidated  statements of operations,  shareholders'  equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended July 31, 2004 and the
related financial statement schedule,  which report appears in the July 31, 2004
annual report on Form 10-K of Manchester Technologies, Inc.


                                  /S/ KPMG LLP

Melville, New York
October 25, 2004
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NanoTech Entertainment, Inc., (fka Aldar
Group, Inc.) (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Kenneth B. Liebscher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 4th
day of June, 2009.





/s/ Ken
Liebscher


Chief
Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enox Biopharma, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Prof.
Yossef Av-Gay, principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: December 11, 2008           By: /s/ Prof. Yossef Av-Gay
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Prof. Yossef Av-Gay
                                  Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2009142EN.01000202.xml

| 23.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/2

---

Recruitment notice PE/118/S

2009/C 142/03

The European Parliament is organising the following selection procedure:

| — | PE/118/S — Temporary staff — Audiovisual administrators (AD 7). |
| --- | --- |

—

PE/118/S — Temporary staff — Audiovisual administrators (AD 7).

PE/118/S

This selection procedure requires a level of education which corresponds to completed university studies attested by a diploma.

By the closing date for applications candidates must, after obtaining the above qualifications, have acquired at least five years’ experience, of which at least three must be in a field relevant to the job description.

This recruitment notice is published only in English and French. The full text is in Official Journal C 142 A in the two languages.

---
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF XTL BIOPHARMACEUTICALS
LTD.



|Name of Subsidiary           |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|---------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|                             |  |                              
|InterCure, Ltd.              |  | Israel                       
|                             |  |                              
|InterCure, Inc.              |  | Delaware                     
|                             |  |                              
|InterCure UK                 |  | UK                           
|                             |  |                              
|XTEPO, Ltd.                  |  | Israel                       
|                             |  |                              
|XTL Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. |  | Delaware                     
|                             |  |                              
|XTL Development, Inc.        |  | Delaware
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DANIEL VERNON BELL,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv63/LAC/CJK

DAVID MORGAN, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated September 26, 2011. (Doc. 9). The parties have been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation,I have determined that the

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s

failure to prosecute and failure to comply with orders of the court. 

Case 3:11-cv-00063-LC-CJK Document 10 Filed 10/27/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27 day of October, 2011.

th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:11cv63/LAC/CJK

Case 3:11-cv-00063-LC-CJK Document 10 Filed 10/27/11 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. BARBOUR

No. 76 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 38.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 January 1980.
Exhibit 4.11

 

WRITTEN ACTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

of

CHS INC.

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of CHS Inc. (the “Company”) has created a series of capital stock designated “Class B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock” (the “Class B Preferred Stock”), pursuant to a resolution adopted September 5, 2013 (the “Creation Resolution”), and has authorized the issuance of up to $1,000,000,000 of shares of the Class B Preferred Stock, Series 3 (the “Shares”), pursuant to a resolution adopted September 4, 2014 (the “Authorizing Resolution”);

 

WHEREAS, the Authorizing Resolution authorizes issuance of the Shares containing final pricing terms (including the initial dividend rate and period, the terms of any rate reset, the initial offering price per share, any no-call period, and the date from which dividends begin to accumulate) to be approved by a written action of this Board of Directors at the time of pricing of the Shares; and

 

WHEREAS, the pricing of the Shares has been concluded on acceptable terms and conditions.

 

RESOLVED, that this Board of Directors authorizes the issuance and sale of the Shares containing the following final pricing terms:

 

(1)         The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Shares, voting as a series, is required to approve any amendment to our articles of incorporation that relates solely to the Shares or to the resolutions establishing the specific economic terms of the Shares if such amendment adversely affects the powers, rights or preferences of the holders of the Shares.

 

(2)         A dividend rate of six and three-quarters percent (6.75%) per annum (equivalent to $1.6875 per annum per Share), until September 30, 2024.

 

(3)         The issuance and sale of up to 21,850,000 Shares at an initial offering price of $25.00 per Share.

 

(4)         A rate reset provision providing for adjustment of the initial dividend rate ten years after original issuance to be calculated as set forth in the Prospectus Supplement (provided that the dividend rate shall not in any event be greater than 8% per annum).

 

(5)         The Shares shall be subject to a no call period of ten (10) years from their date of issuance, during which the Shares will not be subject to optional redemption by the Company.

 

(6)         Dividends shall be fully cumulative and shall accumulate without interest from and including September 15, 2014.
# C_2009234EN.01000601.xml

| 29.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 September 2009

2009/C 234/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4650 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4424 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,92265 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2295 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5114 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,252 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,66 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7059 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2097 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2015 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1868 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6906 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6027 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3542 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0548 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0791 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 752,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,8810 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0023 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2898 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 255,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0982 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,758 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,1120 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,195 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6264 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,8910 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,9590 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4650

JPY

Japanese yen

131,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4424

GBP

Pound sterling

0,92265

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2295

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5114

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,252

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,66

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7059

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2097

RON

Romanian leu

4,2015

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1868

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6906

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6027

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3542

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0548

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0791

KRW

South Korean won

1 752,28

ZAR

South African rand

10,8810

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0023

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2898

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 255,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0982

PHP

Philippine peso

69,758

RUB

Russian rouble

44,1120

THB

Thai baht

49,195

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6264

MXN

Mexican peso

19,8910

INR

Indian rupee

69,9590

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---