alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

vs. 3:10cr108/LAC 

LAVAR EUGENE ANDERSON,

 Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11,

Fed.R.Crim.P., and has entered a plea of guilty to the one count indictment against

him. After cautioning and examining the defendant under oath concerning the

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable

and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis

in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guiltybe accepted and that the defendant be adjudicated

guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: January 18, 2011

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within 24 hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

AVELINO NAZARIO,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv341-MP/WCS

BRIAN JOHNSON, and the

TALLAHASSEE POLICE DEPT.,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an order filed October 1,

2010, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint by November 2, 2010. Plaintiff

was specifically warned that a recommendation would be made that this case be

dismissed if there was a failure to comply with that order. Doc. 7. To date, no response

has been received from the Plaintiff. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.
Page 2 of 2

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, this complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

Plaintiff shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by filing a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on November 22, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv341-MP/WCS
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-18-00202-CV

IN RE NICODEMUS 

INVESTMENTS, LLC

RELATOR

----------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. CV-2015-02367

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, real party 

in interest’s letter in response, relator’s reply, and the mandamus record as 

supplemented.

We therefore vacate our June 21, 2018 order staying the trial court’s

June 12, 2018 contempt order, and we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus as moot.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: PITTMAN, KERR, and BIRDWELL, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 16, 2018

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2011 of Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the Report) and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Graham Briggs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  |  | 
|Date: October 24, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Graham Briggs                    
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Graham Briggs Chief
Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, David Grossman, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this annual report onForm 20-F of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (the “Company”);

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.   The Company’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the Company and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   Designed such internal controlover financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)   Evaluated the effectivenessof the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)   Disclosed in this report anychange in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.   The Company's other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)   All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal control over financialreporting.

 

 

Date: March 29, 2012
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LARRY WAYNE HEBERT,

Petitioner,

v. Case No.: 3:11cv37/MCR/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

______________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated February 14, 2012 (doc. 48). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 10) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of April, 2012.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00037-MCR-EMT Document 51 Filed 04/04/12 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 65578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5791]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Meeting

ACTION: Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 18th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.) The American Health 
Information Community will advise the Secretary and recommend specific 
actions to achieve a common interoperability framework for health 
information technology (IT).

DATES: November 28, 2007, time to be determined. Check Web site for 
further information for dialing into meeting for public comment.

ADDRESSES: This will be a conference call meeting only. Public comment 
will be taken at the conclusion of the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, visit http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This special meeting has been called to 
discuss a recommendation to the Community from its Electronic Health 
Records Workgroup (EHR WG) on the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid 
Services' (CMS) authority to require e-prescribing.

    Dated: November 15, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-5791 Filed 11-16-07; 4:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-P
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

NYKA O’CONNOR,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv360/LAC/EMT

M.L. CARNAHAN, et al.,

Defendants. 

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated April 21, 2011 (Doc. 40). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s emergency motions for injunctive relief (Docs. 31 & 33) are DENIED

without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of May, 2011.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00360-LC-EMT Document 48 Filed 05/09/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to
his knowledge, this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 26, 2011



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Rodger L. Johnson  
|Rodger L. Johnson      
|Chief Executive Officer

This exhibit shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and
irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2012 of Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited (the Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Graham Briggs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                  
|----------------------- |  | -----------------
|Date: October 29, 2012 
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ Graham Briggs
|Graham Briggs          
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 226 (Monday, November 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65988-65989]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5839]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL COUNCIL ON DISABILITY


Sunshine Act Meetings

TYPE: Quarterly Meeting.

DATES AND TIMES:
    November 29, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.
    November 30, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-3:45 p.m.
    December 1, 2007, 8:15 a.m.-11:15 a.m.

LOCATION: Hyatt Regency Boston, One Avenue de LaFayette, Boston, 
Massachusetts.

STATUS:
    November 29, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m.--Open.
    November 30, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-3:45 p.m.--Open.
    December 1, 2007, 8:15 a.m.-11:15 a.m.--Open.
    December 1, 2007, 11:15 a.m.-12 noon--Closed Executive Session.

AGENDA: Public Comment Sessions; Emergency Preparedness Panel 
Discussion; Accessibility and Universal Design Panel Discussion; Youth 
Transition Presentations; Wounded Warriors Presentation; Reports from 
the Chairperson, Council Members, and the Executive Director; Strategic 
Planning; Budget Planning; Unfinished Business; New Business; 
Announcements; Adjournment.

SUNSHINE ACT MEETING CONTACT: Mark S. Quigley, Director of 
Communications, NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 
20004; 202-272-2004 (voice), 202-272-2074 (TTY), 202-272-2022 (fax).

Agency Mission: NCD is an independent federal agency and is composed of 
15 members appointed by the President, by and with the advice and 
consent of the Senate. NCD provides advice to the President, Congress, 
and executive branch agencies promoting policies,

[[Page 65989]]

programs, practices, and procedures that (A) guarantee equal 
opportunity for all individuals with disabilities, regardless of the 
nature or severity of the disability; and (B) to empower individuals 
with disabilities to achieve economic self-sufficiency, independent 
living, and inclusion and integration into all aspects of society.

Accommodations: Those needing reasonable accommodations should notify 
NCD immediately.

Language Translation: In accordance with E.O. 13166, Improving Access 
to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency, those people 
with disabilities who are limited English proficient and seek 
translation services for these meetings should notify NCD immediately.

    Dated: November 16, 2007.
Michael C. Collins,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 07-5839 Filed 11-21-07; 11:12 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P
# C_2010220EN.01000201.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5910 — Martank/MTTI/VTTI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 220/03

On 10 August 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5910. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5910. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2487 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2487

To improve the effectiveness and efficiency and reduce the cost of the 
 supply chain and inventory management of the Department of Defense by 
        consolidating unnecessary and unneeded storage centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2019

   Ms. Ernst introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To improve the effectiveness and efficiency and reduce the cost of the 
 supply chain and inventory management of the Department of Defense by 
        consolidating unnecessary and unneeded storage centers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense Storage and Supply 
Efficiency Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE TO CONSOLIDATE 
              INFRASTRUCTURE DISTRIBUTION CENTERS TO IMPROVE 
              EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY OF SUPPLY CHAIN AND 
              INVENTORY MANAGEMENT.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense may consolidate 
infrastructure, including warehouses, at the distribution centers of 
the Department of Defense to improve the effectiveness and efficiency 
of the supply chain and inventory management of the Department to 
support the needs of the Armed Forces and reduce costs.
    (b) Plan.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 60 days before implementing 
        any consolidation under subsection (a), the Secretary shall 
        submit to Congress a plan for such consolidation.
            (2) Elements.--Any plan submitted under paragraph (1) with 
        respect to consolidation under subsection (a) shall include the 
        following:
                    (A) An estimate of the cost savings of such 
                consolidation.
                    (B) An itemized description of how such cost 
                savings are expected to be spent.
                    (C) A list of the specific facilities that will be 
                subject to closure or disposal under such 
                consolidation.
                    (D) With respect to each facility subject to 
                closure or disposal under such consolidation, an 
                explanation of how the closure or disposal of the 
                facility will increase the efficiency or enhance the 
                functioning of the supply chain of the Department.
                    (E) A certification that the overall effectiveness 
                of the supply chain of the Department will not be 
                compromised or hindered by such consolidation.
                                 <all>
```