alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

EDWARD DEVON JOHNSON, JR.,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv430/LAC/EMT

WARDEN ANTHONY HAYNES, FCI

JESUP,

Respondent.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated October 24, 2011 (doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Petitioner’s Motion for VoluntaryDismissal (doc. 23) is GRANTED and this action

is dismissed without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30 day of November, 2011. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00430-LC-EMT Document 25 Filed 11/30/11 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 21.1**

Name of subsidiary (jurisdiction of incorporation) 

Allgon Systems AB (Sweden) 

Cognition Networks LLC (Florida) 

Filtronic (Suzhou) Telecommunication Products Co. Ltd. (China) 

LGP Allgon Holding AB (Sweden) 

LGP Telecom (Shanghai) Ltd. (China)

LGP Telecom Ltda (Brazil) 

MG Instrument AB (Sweden)

Microwave Ventures, Inc. (Philippines) 

Powerwave Asia, Inc.(Delaware) 

Powerwave China Holdings SRL (Barbados) 

PowerwaveCognition, Inc. (Delaware) 

Powerwave Comtek Oy (Finland) 

Powerwave Corporation Limited (Hong Kong) 

Powerwave Europe, Inc. (Delaware) 

Powerwave Finland Oy (Finland) 

Powerwave Holdings Philippines, Inc. (Philippines) 

Powerwave Hungary Kft (Hungary) 

Powerwave International Holdings SRL(Barbados) 

Powerwave Netherlands B.V. (Netherlands) 

PowerwaveOverseas Holding Limited (UK) 

Powerwave Oy (Finland) 

Powerwave Singapore Pte. Ltd. (Singapore) 

Powerwave Sweden AB (Sweden) 

Powerwave Technologies (Suzhou) Co. Ltd. (China) 

Powerwave Technologies (Wuxi) Co. Ltd. (China) 

Powerwave Technologies Brazil Comercio de Equipamentos de Telecomunicacao Ltda (Brazil) 

Powerwave Technologies Canada, Ltd. (Canada) 

Powerwave Technologies Estonia OU (Estonia) 

Powerwave Technologies France SAS (France) 

Powerwave Technologies GermanyGmbH (Germany) 

Powerwave Technologies Hong Kong Limited (Hong Kong) 

Powerwave Technologies India Private Limited (India) 

Powerwave Technologies Research and Development India PVT Ltd. (India) 

Powerwave Technologies Singapore Pte Ltd (Singapore) 

Powerwave TechnologiesSweden Holdings AB (Sweden) 

Powerwave Technologies UK Limited (UK) 

Powerwave Technologies Sweden AB (Sweden) 

Powerwave UK Limited (UK) 

P-Wave Ltd (Israel) 

REMEC Manufacturing Philippines, Inc. (Philippines) 

REMEC Wireless Telecommunication (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. (China) 

RMPI LLC(California)
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 1 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 2 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 3 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 4 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 5 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 6 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 7 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 8 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 9 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 10 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 11 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 12 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 13 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 14 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 15 of 16
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1-2 Filed 10/25/10 Page 16 of 16
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JENNIFER XU,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00187-MP -GRJ

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, DIVISION OF RISK

MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 92, Oral Motion to Continue Trial, and Doc. 93,

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Senior Judge Maurice M Paul. On April 28, 2011, a

telephone scheduling conference was held, at which the parties jointly made an oral motion to

continue trial. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Oral Motion to Continue Trial, Doc. 92, is GRANTED. The trial date is reset

for Monday, November 7, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.

2. The Clerk is directed to file an amended pretrial order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:09-cv-00187-MCR-GRJ Document 94 Filed 05/06/11 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

Announcement of Meeting.

# ACTION:

 Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 11th meeting of the American Health Information Community Personalized Healthcare Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

# DATES:

January 30, 2008, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern Time].

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will discuss possible common data standards to incorporate interoperable, clinically useful genetic/genomic information and analytical tools into Electronic Health Records (EHRs) to support clinical decision-making for the clinician and consumer.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​phcinstruct.htm.*

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-6132  Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-45-M
Order entered October 21, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01665-CR

No. 05-13-01666-CR

EDUARDO SALINAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-63779-K, F12-63780-K

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

The appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 18(b)

February 18, 2010

Oncor Electric Delivery Holdings Company LLC

1601 Bryan Street

Dallas, Texas 75201

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have audited the
consolidated financial statements of Oncor Electric Delivery Holdings Company LLC and subsidiaries (Oncor Holdings) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 (successor balance sheets), and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008
(successor operations), the period from October 11, 2007 through December 31, 2007 (successor operations) and the period from January 1, 2007 through October 10, 2007 (predecessor operations) of Oncor Electric Delivery Company
LLC (as Oncor Holdings predecessor) , included in Energy Future Holdings Corp.s Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon dated February 18, 2010 (which report expresses
an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to Oncor Holdings as an indirect subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings Corp., which was merged with Texas Energy Future Merger Sub Corp and becoming a subsidiary of Texas Energy
Future Holdings Limited Partnership on October 10, 2007). Note 1 to such financial statements contains a description of your change, during the year ended December 31, 2009, in the date for the annual goodwill impairment test for your
reporting unit. In our judgment, such change is to an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.



|                         
|-------------------------
|Yours truly,             
|                         
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|                         
|Dallas, Texas
EXHIBIT 32.2



CFO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Kevin T. Michaels, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the Company),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 28, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                   |  |     |  |                                                           
|----- |  | ----------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | February 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ KEVIN T. MICHAELS                                     
|      |  |                   |  |     |  | Kevin T. Michaels                                         
|      |  |                   | 
|      |  |                   |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|      |  |                   | 
|      |  |                   |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
#### STATE v. McWHORTER

No. 31 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 462.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 March 1978.
Exhibit 32.02



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Rachel L. Dillard,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2011 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Mesa
Energy Holdings, Inc.



|                  | By:    | /s/ RACHEL L. DILLARD      
|----------------- | ------ | ---------------------------
|Date: May 3, 2012 | Name:  | Rachel L. Dillard          
|                  | Title: | Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv327/RS-EMT

CONTENTS OF BANK AMERICA’S BANK

ACCOUNT NO. XXXX9489,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested by Plaintiff’s Second Motion For Extension Of Time

(Doc. 8) is granted.

ORDERED on January 28, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHANTONIO TAROD ROLLE, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2535

[August 18, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

562016CF002105B, 562016CF002177A, and 562020CF000978A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
----

----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March 1, 2011 | /s/ Crit S. DeMent                                                                 |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | Name: Crit S. DeMent                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|                           | Title: Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |

----

----
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LOUIS REED, JR,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00405-SPM -GRJ

FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Louis Reed, Jr. Petitioner is currently

incarcerated at Liberty Correctional Institution, and challenges a decision of the Florida

Parole Commission revoking his conditional release supervision from a sentence

imposed in Polk County, Florida. The Petition reflects that the conduct giving rise to the

revocation proceeding occurred in Bradenton, Florida, and that the revocation

proceeding was held in Manatee County, both within the Middle District of Florida. 

Petitions challenging actions by the Florida Parole Commission are subject to the

requirements of § 2254. See Thomas v. Crosby, 371 F.3d 782, 788 (11 Cir. 2004). th

Jurisdiction is therefore appropriate in either this district or in the United States District

Court for the Middle District of Florida, as the districts of confinement and conviction,

respectively. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 

The district of conviction, where the revocation conduct and proceedings also

occurred, would appear to be the most convenient for witnesses should an evidentiary

hearing be necessary, and therefore, transfer of this cause to the Middle District is
Page 2 of 2

appropriate. Mitchell v. Henderson, 432 F.2d 435, 436 (5th Cir. 1970) (division of

conviction, where witnesses were located, was appropriate venue over division of

confinement in challenge to conviction); Parker v. Singletary, 974 F.2d 1562, 1582, n.

118 (11th Cir. 1992) (courts should give careful consideration to convenience of

witnesses in transferring habeas corpus petitions under § 2241(d)). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

That this case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Middle District of Florida for all

further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21 day of September 2010. 

st

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

5:04cv134-SPM/AK
# C_2011064EN.01000501.xml

| 1.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6045 — JCI/CRH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 64/02

On 14 January 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6045. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6045. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 216 (Thursday, November 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5589]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 216 / Thursday, November 8, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 63161]]



APPALACHIAN STATES LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE COMMISSION


Annual Meeting

Time and Date: 9:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m., November 9, 2007.

Place: Harrisburg Hilton and Towers, One North Second Street, 
Harrisburg, PA 17101.

Status: Most of the meeting will be open to the public. However, the 
executive session will be closed to the public.

Matters to be Considered: Portions Open to the Public: The primary 
purpose of this meeting is to: (1) Review the independent auditors' 
report of Commission's financial statements for fiscal year 2006-2007; 
(2) Review the Low-Level Radioactive Waste (LLRW) generation 
information for 2006; (3) Consider a proposal budget for fiscal year 
2008-2009; (4) Review recent national developments regarding low 
activity and LLRW management and disposal; and (5) Provide an update on 
PADEP Agreement State Status with the NRC; and (6) Elect the 
Commission's Officers.
    Portions Closed to the Public: An Executive Session, will be held 
to discuss a potential legal matter.

Contact Person for More Information: Richard R. Janati, Administrator 
of the Commission, at 717-787-2163.

Richard R. Janati,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 07-5589 Filed 11-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0000-00-P