alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010180EN.01000701.xml

| 6.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 July 2010

2010/C 180/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2531 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 109,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4513 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82750 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5995 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3325 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0590 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,586 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 286,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1268 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2527 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9620 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4916 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3343 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7606 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8181 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7464 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 533,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6969 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4908 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1929 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 356,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0206 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,213 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,0387 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,638 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2175 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4492 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 58,6140 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2531

JPY

Japanese yen

109,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4513

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82750

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5995

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3325

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0590

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,586

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

286,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1268

RON

Romanian leu

4,2527

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9620

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4916

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3343

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7606

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8181

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7464

KRW

South Korean won

1 533,02

ZAR

South African rand

9,6969

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4908

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1929

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 356,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0206

PHP

Philippine peso

58,213

RUB

Russian rouble

39,0387

THB

Thai baht

40,638

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2175

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4492

INR

Indian rupee

58,6140

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-207-SPM-GRJ

DAVID MORGAN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. 57) and Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 41(a), Defendant Sawgrass Tiki Bar Inc. is hereby DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE and Defendant John Doe No. 2 a/k/a “Peter” is hereby DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The clerk is directed to make the appropriate notation on the

docket.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12 day of July 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00207-RS-GRJ Document 59 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CADAM COLAIANNI,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-304/RS-EMT

SANDY SANSING IMPORTS, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Before me is the Report of Mediation (Doc. 49), noting that the result of the 

mediation is a settlement. Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. 16.2 it is ordered: 

1. The case is dismissed from the active docket of the court. 

2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves 

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this 

Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative purposes, 

and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is direct to 

close the case in its entirety for all purposes. 

ORDERED on May 2, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:10-cv-00304-RS-EMT Document 51 Filed 05/02/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C 1350)
    Cole Credit Property Trust III, Inc.By:
    /s/ Christopher H. ColeName:
    Christopher H. ColeTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
and President 
(Principal
Executive Officer)By:
    /s/ D. Kirk McAllaster, JrName:
    D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Date:      November 12, 2009
    
    Title:
    Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Roy MANNIS, Appellant, Bob Hall; Billy G. McLaughlin; Wallace Barber; Ralph Griffin; Paul Calkin; George Higgins; Jimmy Benson; Darrell Floyd; Bobby Hulse; David Johnson; Orville Ledbetter; Jimmy Reeves; Leo George; Sam Banks; William L. Clark; First Electric Cooperative Corporation, Defendants.

No. 98-4176.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: July 26, 1999.

Filed: Aug. 2, 1999.

Rufus T. Buie, III, Dewitt, AR, and Carroll C. Johnson, Memphis, TN, argued, for Appellant.

Fletcher Jackson, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Little Rock, AR, argued, for Appellee.

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The United States Department of the Interior filed suit against Roy Mannis under the National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act, 16 U.S.C. § 668dd, seeking an injunction requiring Mannis to remove his houseboat from the White River National Wildlife Refuge. Mannis appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of the United States and the resulting injunction against *864Mannis. Mannis bases his appeal solely upon an argument that he first raised in a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion that he filed with the district court after he filed the instant appeal. The district court denied Mannis’s Rule 60(b) motion and Mannis did not appeal that order.

We do not entertain new arguments on appeal from the grant of summary judgment. *See Berg v. Norand Corp.,*169 F.3d 1140, 1145 (8th Cir.1999), *cert. denied,*— U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 174, — L.Ed.2d - (1999). Further, our review of the argument underlying Man-nis’s Rule 60(b) motion is properly sought in an appeal from the order denying Rule 60(b) relief. *See Winter v. Cerro Gordo County Conservation Bd.,*925 F.2d 1069, 1073 & n. 7 (8th Cir.1991) (appealing party must file new appeal if Rule 60(b) motion is denied). Because there is nothing for us to consider on the merits, we must dismiss Mannis’s appeal. *Cf. Carter v. Lutheran Med. Ctr.,*87 F.3d 1025, 1026 (8th Cir.1996) (appeal must be dismissed because brief presents no question for court to decide).

Appeal dismissed.

1

. The Honorable George Howard, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6305
JOHN PAUL TURNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SAMUEL G. WILSON, United States District Judge; JON R. BOLYARD, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-86-R) Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 16, 1997 Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the dist rict court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Wilson , No. CA97-86-R (W.D. Va. Feb . 6 & 25, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PETER ANTHONY DAVIS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:10cv385/MCR/CJK

SEC’Y, FLA. DEP’T OF CORR.,

Respondent.

__________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated November 20, 2012 (doc. 40). The petitioner has been furnished

a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of those portions as to which an objection has been made.1

Having considered the report and recommendation and petitioner’s objections, I

have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1), challenging the judgment of

conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Peter Anthony Davis in the Circuit Court for

Walton County, Florida, Case No. 99-CF-0141 is DENIED, and the clerk is directed to

close the file.

Petitioner filed extensive objections (see doc. 44), which the undersigned carefully reviewed and

1

considered.
Page 2 of 2

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of July, 2013.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case No: 3:10cv385/MCR/CJK
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case Nos.: 3:01cr83/LAC/EMT

 3:16cv330/LAC/EMT

GARRY A. CARR

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated October 3, 2016 (ECF No. 368). Defendant has been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Havingconsidered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’sReport andRecommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:01-cr-00083-LC-EMT Document 369 Filed 11/02/16 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:01cr83/LAC/EMT; 3:16cv330/LAC/EMT

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Defendant’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of November, 2016.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:01-cr-00083-LC-EMT Document 369 Filed 11/02/16 Page 2 of 2
Third District Court of Appeal 

State of Florida 

Opinion filed February 20, 2019. 

________________ 

No. 3D18-0147 

Lower Tribunal No. 02-18680 

________________ 

Antwann Rogers, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

The State of Florida, 

Appellee. 

 An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael 

Hanzman, Judge. 

 Antwann Rogers, in proper person. 

 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee. 

Before SALTER, LINDSEY, and MILLER, JJ. 

MILLER, J. 
 2 

Antwann L. Rogers appeals the summary denial of his petition for writ of 

mandamus which sought to compel the State’s public records specialist to provide 

him with various documents.1

 As the State properly concedes, the record is devoid 

of claimed exemptions to disclosure, and there remains a disputed factual issue as to 

whether the State possesses the requested records. Thus, we reverse and remand for 

an evidentiary hearing. See DeGregorio v. State, 205 So. 3d 841 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) 

(reversing a denial of petition upon unsworn pleadings and remanding for an 

evidentiary hearing to determine whether the respondent had furnished all records); 

Perez v. State, 980 So. 2d 1205, 1206 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (“If the petition and 

response raise disputed factual issues, the trial court should resolve them upon 

proper evidence, which may include undisputed affidavits.”); Radford v. Brock, 914 

So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (reversing a dismissal of petition in the absence of 

sworn evidence and remanding for further proceedings).

Reversed and remanded. 

 

1

 The State does not challenge the legal sufficiency of the petition. See generally 

Clay Cty. Educ. Ass’n v. Clay Cty. Sch. Bd., 144 So. 3d 708, 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 

2014) (citing Polley v. Gardner, 98 So. 3d 648, 649 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012)).
# C_2010187EN.01000301.xml

| 10.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5789 — Geely/Daqing/Volvo Cars)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 187/02

On 6 July 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5789. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5789. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of
Independent  Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board
of Directors


XTL
Biopharmaceuticals Ltd.




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (File
No. 333-141529, File No. 333-147024 and File No. 333-153055) on Form F-3 and the
registration statements (File No. 333-148085, File No. 333-148754 and File No.
333-154795) on Form S-8 of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd (a Development Stage
Company) of our report dated May 3, 2005, with respect to the consolidated
statements of operations, changes in shareholders' equity and cash flows of XTL
Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (a Development Stage Company) and its subsidiary for the
period from March 9, 1993 to December 31, 2000, which report appears in the
December 31, 2008, annual report on Form 20-F of XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd (a
Development Stage Company).





Somekh
Chaikin


Certified
Public Accountants (Isr.)


(A member
firm of KPMG International)





Tel Aviv,
Israel


April 6,
2009
# C_2009280EN.01000401.xml

| 20.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 November 2009

2009/C 280/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4863 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4411 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89385 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2855 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5131 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3920 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,605 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,96 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7081 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1358 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2785 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2165 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6193 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5776 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,5190 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0364 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0664 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 727,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2180 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1491 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3183 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 208,07 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0400 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,973 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,9468 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,350 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5679 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,4319 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,3360 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4863

JPY

Japanese yen

132,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4411

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89385

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2855

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5131

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3920

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,605

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,96

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7081

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1358

RON

Romanian leu

4,2785

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2165

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6193

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5776

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,5190

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0364

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0664

KRW

South Korean won

1 727,00

ZAR

South African rand

11,2180

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1491

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3183

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 208,07

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0400

PHP

Philippine peso

69,973

RUB

Russian rouble

42,9468

THB

Thai baht

49,350

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5679

MXN

Mexican peso

19,4319

INR

Indian rupee

69,3360

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PERRY GENE VANDERFORD,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv552/MCR/EMT

LT. NELSON, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May 27, 2011 (Doc. 16). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply

with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of June, 2011.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00552-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:10-cv-00235-SPM -GRJ Document 1 Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:10-cv-00235-SPM -GRJ Document 1 Filed 11/29/10 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:10-cv-00235-SPM -GRJ Document 1 Filed 11/29/10 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:10-cv-00235-SPM -GRJ Document 1 Filed 11/29/10 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:10-cv-00235-SPM -GRJ Document 1 Filed 11/29/10 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:10-cv-00235-SPM -GRJ Document 1 Filed 11/29/10 Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LEAF Equipment Finance Fund 4, L.P. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Crit S. DeMent, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                      
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 16, 2010 |  | /s/ Crit S. DeMent                                   
|                      |  | Name: Crit S. DeMent                                 
|                      |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 56335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD03


Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement for Amendments to the Atlantic Large 
Whale Take Reduction Plan

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 
1969, NMFS announces availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) for 
amending the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP). NMFS 
approves Alternative 6 Final Preferred, which includes broad-based, 
coast-wide gear modifications and seasonal restrictions.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the ROD and Final Environmental Impact Statement 
(FEIS)/Regulatory Impact Review for amending the ALWTRP can be obtained 
from the ALWTRP website listed under the Electronic Access portion of 
this document or by contacting staff listed under the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. For additional ADDRESSES 
and Web sites for document availability see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diane Borggaard, NMFS, Northeast 
Region, 978-281-9300 Ext. 6503, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f3979a929d96dd919c81949492928197b39d9c9292dd949c85"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="91f5f8f0fff4bff3fee3f6f6f0f0e3f5d1fffef0f0bff6fee7">[email protected]</span></a>; Kristy Long, 
NMFS, Office of Protected Resources, 301-713-2322, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4cfd6cdd7d0dd8ac8cbcac3e4cacbc5c58ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="660d140f15121f480a090801260809070748010910">[email protected]</span></a>; or Barb Zoodsma, NMFS, Southeast Region, 904-321-
2806, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ae8ebf8e8a4f0e5e5eef9e7ebcae4e5ebeba4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="43212231216d392c2c27302e22032d2c22226d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Access

    The ROD and the FEIS are available electronically from the 
following Web site: http://www.nero.noaa.gov/whaletrp/.

    Dated: September 27, 2007.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 07-4913 Filed 10-1-07; 11:33 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>