alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5246 

To require directors of medical facilities of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs to submit plans to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on how 

to improve such facilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2018 

Mr. RUSSELL (for himself, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. COLE, and Mr. LUCAS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To require directors of medical facilities of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs to submit plans to the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs on how to improve such facilities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘VA Medical Center 

5 Improvement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PLANS TO IMPROVE MEDICAL FACILITIES OF THE 

7 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

8 (a) PLAN REQUIRED.— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5246 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Veterans 

2 Affairs shall require each director of a medical facil3 ity of the Department of Veterans Affairs to submit 

4 to the Secretary, not later than 90 days after the 

5 date of the enactment of this Act, a plan to improve 

6 such facility in such a fashion as would result in the 

7 facility obtaining a Department five-star rating. 

8 (2) CONTENTS.—The Secretary shall ensure 

9 that each plan submitted under paragraph (1) in10 cludes sufficient detail regarding resources, per11 sonnel changes, hiring authorities, additional staff12 ing, and changes to information systems as is nec13 essary to obtain the rating described in such para14 graph. 

15 (b) ANNUAL REPORTS.—The Secretary shall ensure 

16 that, in the first fiscal year beginning after the date that 

17 is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act and 

18 not less frequently than once each fiscal year thereafter, 

19 each director of a medical facility of the Department which 

20 does not have a Department five-star rating submits to 

21 the Secretary a report on the actions taken by the director 

22 to carry out the plan submitted by the director under sub23 section (a)(1) and to obtain the rating described in such 

24 subsection. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5246 IH

1 (c) SENSE OF CONGRESS ON USE OF AUTHORITIES

2 TO INVESTIGATE MEDICAL CENTERS OF THE DEPART3 MENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.—It is the sense of Con4 gress that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs should make 

5 full use of the authorities provided by section 2 of the En6 hancing Veteran Care Act (Public Law 115–95). 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

                        Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer,                         *Telephone:*                         (202) 694-1220.                    

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-5931 Filed 11-29-07; 2:43 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5307 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5307

    To require that certain Federal education funds be used for the 
      improvement of security at elementary and secondary schools.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2018

  Mr. Knight introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require that certain Federal education funds be used for the 
      improvement of security at elementary and secondary schools.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``School Training, Equipment, and 
Protection Act of 2018'' or the ``STEP Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. FUNDS FOR SCHOOL TRAINING, EQUIPMENT, AND PROTECTION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, not 
less than $50,000,000 of any unobligated amounts made available before 
the date of the enactment of this Act to carry out part A of title IV 
of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7101 
et seq.) shall be used to provide elementary schools and secondary 
schools with funds for the following:
            (1) Barricade technology.
            (2) Surveillance technology.
            (3) Individualized active shooter alarms.
            (4) Security and active shooter training for school faculty 
        and staff.
            (5) Coordination activities with local law enforcement 
        agencies.
            (6) Active shooter training exercises on school grounds for 
        local law enforcement agencies.
            (7) Vulnerability assessments and corresponding action 
        plans, as executed by local law enforcement agencies.
    (b) Elementary and Secondary Schools Defined.--In this section, the 
terms ``elementary school'' and ``secondary school'' have the meanings 
given the terms in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801).

SEC. 3. REPORT.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Education shall submit to Congress a report 
describing how funds made available under section 2 have been 
distributed among the geographic regions of the United States and among 
urban, suburban, and rural areas.
                                 <all>
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed April 26, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-717

Lower Tribunal No. F15-8075

________________

Fabian Pickett,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz, Judge.

Daniel J. Tibbitt, P.A., and Daniel Tibbitt, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Katryna Santa Cruz, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES and HENDON, JJ. 

SCALES, J.
2

Fabian Pickett appeals the trial court’s summary denial of his Florida 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. Pickett’s post-conviction motion 

alleged that Pickett is entitled to a new trial based both on newly discovered 

evidence and on six bases of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Pickett 

was convicted of attempted second-degree murder after firing multiple gun 

shots toward the victim. At trial, Pickett’s defense was that he fired his gun 

toward the victim in preemptive self-defense, believing (though erroneously) 

that the victim might have a gun. The trial court sentenced Pickett to twenty 

years in prison, applying a minimum mandatory sentence. On plenary 

appeal, this Court upheld Pickett’s conviction and sentence. Pickett v. State, 

254 So. 3d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

About four years after sentencing, the victim signed an affidavit in 

which the victim recanted his trial testimony, and stated that, contrary to his 

testimony (and the testimony of several other witnesses), the victim indeed 

was carrying a gun. In its detailed, eight-page, well-reasoned order, the trial 

court concluded that, even if the assertions in the victim’s affidavit were true, 

the outcome of the trial would have been no different because, at trial, Pickett 

testified that he did not see the victim holding any weapon.

We, therefore, agree with the trial court that the victim’s recantation is

immaterial to Pickett’s guilty verdict. See Stephens v. State, 829 So. 2d 945, 
3

945-46 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (recognizing that (i) recantation evidence is a 

type of newly discovered evidence that “must be such that it would probably 

produce an acquittal on retrial,” and (ii) “an evidentiary hearing in the context 

of recantations” is not required where the recantation affidavit is immaterial 

to the verdict).

As to Pickett’s assertion that he was the victim of ineffective assistance 

of trial counsel, we agree with the trial court that none of Pickett’s asserted 

grounds meets the standards of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 687 

(1984).

Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CITIZENS STATE BANK,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:10-CV-224-SPM/GRJ

DIXIE COUNTY,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Plaintiff’s Unopposed

Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

(doc. 20). The Court finds this request to be reasonable. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The motion (doc. 20) is granted.

2. The Plaintiff shall have until January 31, 2011, to respond to the

Motion to Dismiss (doc. 19).

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-fourth day of January, 2011.

s/Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ PAPIERFABRIK AUGUST KOEHLER SE, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
UNITED STATES, APPVI ON, INC., Defendants

- Appellees

______________________
2016

- 2425

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No s . 1:12

- cv

- 00091

- TCS, 1:12

- cv

- 00130

- TCS, Chief Judge Timothy C. Stanceu.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
J OHN F. W OOD , Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, Was hington, DC, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also repr esented by F LORA A MANDA D E B USK , L YNN K AMARCK , M AT THEW R. N ICELY , E RIC S. P ARNES , D ANIEL M ARTIN W ITKOWSKI

.
J OSHUA E. K URLAND , Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee United States. Also represented by C HAD A. R EADLER , J EANNE E.D AVIDSON , R EGINALD T. B LADES , J R .; J ESSICA M. L INK , Office of Chief Counsel for Trade Enforcement and Co mpliance, United States Department of Commerce, Was hington, DC.

D ANIEL S CHNEIDERMAN , King & Spalding LLP, Was hington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee Appvion, Inc. Also represented by S TEPHEN A. J ONES

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE , S CHALL , and O’M ALLEY , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

February 7, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 73777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6249]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, January 4, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person For More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-6249 Filed 12-26-07; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 5:11cv84-RH/EMT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SAMUEL NORRIS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv84-RH/EMT

PAIGE AUGUSTINE,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING THE PETITION

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 16. No objections have been filed. Upon 

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The petition is dismissed with 

prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on June 2, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-00084-RH-EMT Document 18 Filed 06/02/12 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.0

WRITTEN CERTIFICATION of
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER and CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of EFJ, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that, to the best of each of their knowledge:

the
Company's Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ending December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/MICHAEL E. JALBERTMichael E. Jalbert
Chief Executive Officer
February 24, 2004
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/MASSOUD SAFAVIMassoud Safavi
Chief Financial Officer
February 24, 2004        

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION of
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of EF Johnson Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jana Ahlfinger Bell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ JANA AHLFINGER BELL Jana Ahlfinger Bell Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 31, 2009


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00011-MP-GRJ-1

RAUL PAGAN RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 84, Motion to Continue Change of Plea by Raul

Pagan Rodriguez. The parties have been unable to come to an agreement concerning the

Statement of Facts, primarily due to the language barrier between the Defendant and his counsel. 

As such, defendant requests the Court continue his change of plea hearing until October 26,

2011. The government does not oppose the requested relief. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant’s motion to continue change of plea hearing, Doc. 84, is GRANTED.

2. The change of plea hearing is CONTINUED until Wednesday, October 26, 2011

at 11:00 a.m.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Otter TailAg Enterprises, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Anthony Hicks, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Date:  August 19, 2009

 
|   | /s/ Anthony Hicks                                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony Hicks                                       |
|   | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:10cr103/MCR/CJK

3:16cv315/MCR/CJK

KENNETH EUGENE HAYNES

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated September 9, 2016. ECF No. 49. Defendant has been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered theReport and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 3:10-cr-00103-MCR-CJK Document 51 Filed 10/05/16 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, ECF No.

41, is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of October, 2016.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cr103/MCR/CJK / 3:16cv315/MCR/CJK

Case 3:10-cr-00103-MCR-CJK Document 51 Filed 10/05/16 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. McKOY

No. 32 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 516.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to the North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 March 1980.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SANDRA LEE CAREY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3956

[ August 13, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Gary L. Sweet , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 2014CF001291A

.

Sandra Lee Carey, Vero Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and K UNT Z

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RUFUS S. MILLER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-00276-RS-GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Respondents’ Third Motion For Enlargement

Of Time. (Doc. 14.) Respondents seek a third 30 day extension of time to respond to

the Petition. (Doc. 1.) 

Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Respondents’ Third Motion For Enlargement Of Time (Doc. 14) is

GRANTED. Respondents shall file their response to the Petition on or

before May 4, 2011. 

2. Petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed on or before June 3, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5 day of April, 2011. th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
# C_2010046EN.01000701.xml

| 24.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 February 2010

2010/C 46/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3577 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4434 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88020 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7913 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4667 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0210 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,805 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9703 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1241 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0849 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5070 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4172 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5382 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9383 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9125 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 559,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,4380 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2686 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2870 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 625,71 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6060 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,516 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,7940 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,906 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4692 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4186 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,7460 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3577

JPY

Japanese yen

123,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4434

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88020

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7913

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4667

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0210

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,805

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9703

RON

Romanian leu

4,1241

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0849

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5070

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4172

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5382

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9383

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9125

KRW

South Korean won

1 559,06

ZAR

South African rand

10,4380

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2686

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2870

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 625,71

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6060

PHP

Philippine peso

62,516

RUB

Russian rouble

40,7940

THB

Thai baht

44,906

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4692

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4186

INR

Indian rupee

62,7460

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---