alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-13, May 22, 1995, this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for review of a revised information collection. SF 2808, Designation of Beneficiary: Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), is used by persons covered by CSRS to designate a beneficiary to receive the lump sum payment due from the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund in the event of their death.

Approximately 2,000 forms will completed annually. The form takes approximately 15 minutes to complete. The annual burden is estimated at 500 hours.

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Mary Beth Smith-Toomey on (202) 606-8358, Fax (202) 418-3251 or via E-mail to                         *MaryBeth.Smith-Toomey@opm.gov.*                         Please include a mailing address with your request.                    

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar days from the date of this publication.

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to—Ronald W. Melton, Deputy Assistant Director, Retirement Services Program, Center for Retirement and Insurance Services, U.S. Office  of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 20415-3500; and Brenda Aguilar, OPM Desk Officer,  Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.

# FOR  INFORMATION REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE COORDINATION CONTACT:

Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RIS Support Services/Support Group, (202) 606-0623.

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

Howard Weizmann,

Deputy Director.

[FR Doc. 07-6219 Filed 12-26-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-38-M
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONBY PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Manuel PabloZúñiga-Pflücker, Chief Executive Officer of BPZ Resources, Inc., certifythat:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this amendment no. 1 tothe annual report on Form 10-K/A and the annual report on Form 10-Koriginally filed on March 31, 2010 of BPZ Resources, Inc.; and

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report.

 

 
| /s/  MANUEL  PABLO ZÚÑIGA-PFLÜCKER |     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Manuel Pablo  Zúñiga-Pflücker                |     |
| *President,  Chief Executive Officer and Director*          | * * |
| April 30, 2010                                         |     |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PANAMA CITY DIVISION 

HANCOCK BANK, a Mississippi 

banking corporation, 

Plaintiff/ Counter-defendant 

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-94/RS-CJK

BOYD BROTHERS, INC., a Florida 

corporation, et al., 

Defendants/ Counterclaimants 

_________________________________________/ 

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Response to Show Cause Order (Doc. 35). 

 From the pleadings, it appears that common questions of law or fact are involved 

in these five suits filed in this Court: 

Hancock Bank v. Boyd Brothers et al., 5:11-cv-94-RS-CJK 

Hancock Bank v. Boyd Brothers et al., 5:11-cv-95-RS-GRJ 

Hancock Bank v. Boyd Brothers et al., 5:11-cv-96-RS-CJK 

Hancock Bank v. Boyd Brothers et al., 5:11-cv-97-RS-EMT 

Hancock Bank v. Boyd Brothers et al., 5:11-cv-98-RS-CJK 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42 (a) (2), the five cases shall be consolidated. 

Case 5:11-cv-00098-RS-CJK Document 33 Filed 06/14/11 Page 1 of 2
IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Clerk shall consolidate the cases. 

2. The Clerk shall file a copy of this Order in each of these cases. 

3. All future pleadings should be filed only in case 5:11-cv-94-RS-CJK. 

ORDERED on June 14, 2011. 

/S/ Richard Smoak

RICHARD SMOAK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00098-RS-CJK Document 33 Filed 06/14/11 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection with the amended quarterly report of Pickford Minerals, Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form  10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fidel
Thomas,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  President,  Chief  Financial  Officer  and
Principal  Accounting  Officer  of  the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 16, 2008                         By /s/ Fidel Thomas
                                              Fidel Thomas
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              Chief Financial Officer, and
                                              Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32(e)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the Report.





|/s/ E. Renae ConleyE. Renae Conley
Chair of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of 
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:	August 7, 2008
Order on Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Northern District of Florida

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No.: 3:10cr86-001/MCR

USM No.: 04521-017

GREGORY LEONARD KING, JR.

/

Date of Original Judgment: November 23, 2010

Date of Previous Amended Judgment: December 12, 2011

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any)

Order on Motion for Sentence Reduction

The Defendant has moved under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of

imprisonment previously imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently

been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 994(u). 

Having considered such motion, and taking into account Amendment 782, USSG

§1B1.10, and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent they are

applicable, the Court orders that the motion is GRANTED and the Defendant’s previously

imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 156 months is reduced to

100 months.

(Complete Part I or II Attachment, as applicable)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: June 8, 2015 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

Signature of Judge

 M. Casey Rodgers

Effective Date: November 1, 2015 Chief United States District Judge

 (if different from order date) Printed Name and Title of Judge

Case 3:10-cr-00086-MCR Document 34 Filed 06/08/15 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                              16,156
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       36,923
<ALLOWANCES>                                           899
<INVENTORY>                                          6,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    60,729
<PP&E>                                              12,907
<DEPRECIATION>                                       6,578
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      74,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               30,276
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                82
<OTHER-SE>                                          44,181
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        74,573
<SALES>                                            300,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   300,073
<CGS>                                              260,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      260,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    33,539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      6,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,100
<EPS-BASIC>                                           .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .50




</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

GREGORY D. TRUETTE,

Petitioner, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-292/RS-MD

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent. 

_________________________________________ /

UAMORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 59). No 

objections have been filed. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated 

by reference in this Order. 

2. The Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 29) is GRANTED. 

3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), later amended (Doc. 18) 

challenging the conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Gregory D. Truette, 

in the Circuit Court of Washington County, Florida, case numbers 99-51CF and 

00-253CF, are DISMISSED with prejudice. 

4. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

Case 5:10-cv-00292-RS-MD Document 61 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 2
5. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Plaintiff has not made a 

substantial showing of a denial of a Constitutional right. 

ORDERED on March 30, 2012.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00292-RS-MD Document 61 Filed 03/30/12 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, George P. Lin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Arrin Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Arrin Corporation.


Date: 11/16/10                       By: /s/ George P. Lin
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                     Name:  George P. Lin
                                     Title: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73814-73815]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6193]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Notice of Open Special Meeting of the Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory 
Committee (SAAC) of the Export-Import Bank of the United States 
(Export-Import Bank)

SUMMARY: The Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory Committee was established by 
(Pub. L.) 105-121, November 26, 1997, to advise the Board of Directors 
on the development and implementation of policies and programs designed 
to support the expansion of the Bank's financial commitments in Sub-
Saharan Africa under the loan, guarantee and insurance programs of the 
Bank. Further, the committee shall make recommendations on how the Bank 
can facilitate greater support by U.S. commercial banks for trade with 
Sub-Saharan Africa.

TIME AND PLACE: January 16, at 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. The meeting will be 
held at the Export-Import Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20571.
    Agenda: Introduction of SAAC members, ethics training, report to 
congress, 2007 SAAC recommendations update, bank operating issues and 
processes, business development update and ``Attracting the interest of 
new U.S. companies to the African market''.
    Public Participation: The meeting will be open to public 
participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral 
questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written 
statement(s) before or after the meeting. If any person wishes 
auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special 
accommodations please contact, prior to January 16, 2008, Barbara 
Ransom, Room 1241, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, 
Voice: (202) 565-3525 or TDD (202) 565-3377.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact 
Barbara Ransom, Room 1241, 811 Vermont

[[Page 73815]]

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3525.

Kamil Cook,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-6193 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50182 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BYRON DWAYNE HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-97-CR-99-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1998 Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Byron Dwayne Harris challenges the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for possession with the intent to distribute crack cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He contends that the district court erroneously believed it did not have the discretion to depart downwardly and/or to refuse to consider certain otherwise relevant sentencing facts in order to effectuate the Sentencing Commission’s stated goal of severely punishing mid- and high-No. 98-50182 -2- level drug dealers rather than low-level drug dealers, such as himself. Harris has not shown that the district court believed a downward departure was warranted but precluded by the guidelines. His appeal does not present a reviewable issue. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed. See United States v.
Brace , 145 F.3d 247, 263 (5th Cir.)(en banc), cert. denied , 1998 WL 651586 (Nov. 2, 1998); see also United States v. McKinney , 53 F.3d 664, 677 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



--------------------------------------------------------------------



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powergae, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Kovalenko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|Date:  May 1, 2009 |  | By:  /s/ Andrew Kovalenko               
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------
|                   |  |                                         
|                   |  | Andrew Kovalenko
Chief Financial Officer



28



|
|
# C_2010305EN.01000101.xml

| 11.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5967 — PHL/CSI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 305/01

On 17 September 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5967. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5967. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20468 Summary Calendar

LYNN JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CITY OF HOUSTON, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CV-200

-------------------- June 1, 2000 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Lynn Jones appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against the City of Houston. Jones argues 1) that the summary judgment was based upon issues not raised by the parties -- whether Jones suffered a constitutional violation and whether the defendant acted in bad faith -- and that Jones was not given notice that the district court was considering those issues, 2) that the district court erred by applying Arizona v. Youngblood , 488 U.S. 51 (1988), to Jones’ case, and 3) that there was evidence of bad faith and aNo. 99-20468 -2- custom or policy of the Houston police department’s crime lab violating Jones’ due process rights. Our review of the record reveals that the parties essentially presented the issue of bad faith when they discussed whether crime lab personnel acted with deliberate indifference to Jones’ rights by failing to expeditiously conduct DNA testing. The district court did not grant summary judgment on an issue not addressed by the parties. See Washington v. Resolution Trust Corp. , 68 F.3d 935, 939-40 (5th Cir. 1995). Regardless of the application of Youngblood , 488 U.S. at 57- 58, our de novo review reveals that there was no evidence that the crime lab’s delay in Jones’ case was part of a policy or custom of the crime lab. There was no evidence of a city custom or policy violating Jones’ constitutional rights. See Bennett v. Slidell , 728 F.2d 762, 767 (5th Cir. 1984) (en banc). The summary judgment accordingly is AFFIRMED.