alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011124EN.01001001.xml

| 27.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 124/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124/10

---

Notification of vacancy notice for Administrative Director (grade AD 14) of Eurojust — The Hague (the Netherlands) — 11/EJ/08

2011/C 124/06

Eurojust invites applications for the position of Administrative Director of Eurojust. Eurojust was established in 2002 to enhance the effectiveness of the Member States’ competent authorities to deal with serious cross-border and organised crime. Eurojust is formed of prosecutors, judges or police officers who are responsible for its organisation and operation. It has a Secretariat led by the Administrative Director. The Administrative Director is responsible, under the supervision of the President of the College, for the day-to-day administration of Eurojust and for staff management. Please consult our website for the detailed vacancy notice and procedure for application:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/recr_vacancies.htm

The deadline for submission of applications is set on 25 May 2011 at midnight CET.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HARRY MICHAEL WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-474-SPM-GRJ

MORRIS YOUNG, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

On December 6, 2011, Defendants Keyshonda Thompson and Lamonte

Peterson filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state a claim. 

(Doc. 22.) N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(C)(1) provides “Each party opposing a motion shall

have fourteen (14) days from the date of service of the motion in which to file and serve

a responsive memorandum with citation of authorities in opposition to the motion.” As

of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has neither filed a response nor filed a motion for an

extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

1. Plaintiff shall respond to the Motion To Dismiss filed by Defendants

Keyshonda Thompson and Lamonte Peterson (Doc. 22) on or before January

30, 2012.

2. Failure to comply with this Order in the allotted time will result in a

recommendation to the district judge that the motion to dismiss be granted

pursuant to N.D.Fla.Loc. Rule 7.1(C) for failure to file a responsive

memorandum. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 9 day of January 2012. th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00474-SPM-GRJ Document 23 Filed 01/09/12 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

AMANDA MICHELLE NIX,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv303/MCR/CJK

ROLLING HILLS MANAGEMENT

GROUP, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated March 15, 2012 (doc. 49). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The parties’ Joint Motion for Dismissal (doc. 48) is GRANTED.

3. All claims in this matter are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to the

parties’ agreement. 

Case 3:10-cv-00303-MCR-CJK Document 50 Filed 04/19/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of April, 2012.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv303/MCR/CJK

Case 3:10-cv-00303-MCR-CJK Document 50 Filed 04/19/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ROBERT GILLIAM,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv319-RH/WCS

R. A. PURDUE,

Respondent.

____________________________/

ORDER FOR TRANSFER

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 3. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Georgia. The clerk must take all steps necessary to effect the

transfer.

SO ORDERED on September 3, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Goldrich Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Schara, Chief Executive Officer, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrich Mining Company.







/s/ William Schara

DATE:  May 16, 2011

William Schara, Chief Executive Officer and President





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Goldrich Mining Company and will be retained by Goldrich Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010217EN.01S00301.xml

| 11.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 217/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 217/s3

---

NOTICE

On 11 August 2010, in Official Journal of the European Union C 217 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — sixth supplement to the 28th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
No. 1283, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene*and *Howard A. Glickstein*for respondents.

#### Leigh *v.*Anderson, Jail Superintendent, et al.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SAM J. PEARSON, IV,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:11cv81/MCR/CJK

BRIDGET E. GRAHAM, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff

commenced this civil rights action on February 17, 2011, by filing a complaint 

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (doc. 1), and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

(doc. 2). Plaintiff’s motion, however, was found to be deficient and he was given

thirty (30) days in which to either submit the $350.00 filing fee or file another

motion to proceed in forma pauperis, with a properly completed affidavit of

financial status (doc. 5). On May 2, 2011, having received no response from

plaintiff, this court issued an order giving plaintiff fourteen (14) days to show

cause why this case should not be dismissed (doc. 6). To date, there has been no

response from plaintiff whatsoever since his initial filing.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this cause be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for

plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with orders of the court.

Case 3:11-cv-00081-MCR-CJK Document 7 Filed 05/31/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida this 31st day of May, 2011.

 

/s/ Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within fourteen days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline

that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and

does not control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other

parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual

findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th

Cir. 1988).

Case No: 3:11cv81/MCR/CJK

Case 3:11-cv-00081-MCR-CJK Document 7 Filed 05/31/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cr-00043-MP -GRJ

1:10-cr-00044-MP -GRJ

ROBERT ALEXANDER KRASNOW,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

It has come to the attention of this Court that the probation officer assigned to this case

has been served a subpoena from Assistant State Attorney Wesley Paxson, III, directing her to

appear at the Hamilton County Courthouse on December 8, 2010, to testify in a hearing on a

motion filed by Defendant to modify conditions of release in state case no. 10-000134-CF-(A). 

Before the probation officer will be required to appear pursuant to the subpoena, Assistant State

Attorney Paxson will be required to inform this Court in writing the specific subject matter about

which he intends to question the probation officer. The probation officer is directed not to

appear pursuant to the subpoena until further order of this Court, after such written information

is received and considered by this Court.

The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve a copy of this order directly on Assistant State

Attorney Paxson.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of December, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ATUNDO KANILI,

a/k/a ATUNDO WILLIAMS,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv90/RV/EMT

EDWIN G. BUSS,

Respondent. 

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated July 15, 2011 (Doc. 17). Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed

objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Petitioner’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of August, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00090-RV-EMT Document 21 Filed 08/24/11 Page 1 of 1
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the peiod ending June 30,      2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MD      Holdings Corp. |

|                     | MD      Holdings, Corp. |
|--------------------------|-------------------------|
|                     |                    |
| Date:      July 22, 2009 | By:           | /s/      Marshall Davis |
|                     |                    | Marshall      Davis |
|                     |                    | Chief      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Director and Principal      AccountingOfficer  |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6624

PAUL NAGY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HARLEY LAPPIN; SALLY C. JOHNSON; M. SCHAEFER;

BRYON HERBEL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-98-282-5-H)

Submitted: September 10, 1999 Decided: October 15, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul Nagy, Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris Shepard, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Nagy v. Lappin, No. CA-98-282-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 24

1999). The motion to expedite is denied. We deny the motion for

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Annual Report of Simulations Plus, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and as amended (the “Report”), Walter S. Woltosz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Momoko A. Beran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that to his/her knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/Walter S. Woltosz


Walter S. Woltosz


Chief Executive Officer


November 29, 2010





/s/Momoko A. Beran


Momoko A. Beran


Chief Financial Officer


November 29, 2010





(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Simulations Plus, Inc. and will be retained by Simulations Plus, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS Case No. 3:09cv358/WS/EMT

ROBERT W. SMITH

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Magistrate Judge Timothy on February 17, 2010 

Type of Motion/Pleading: Motion For Entry of Default 

Filed by: Plaintiff on 2/17/10 Document 9

( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 /s/ Teresa Milstead 

Deputy Clerk: Teresa Milstead

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 18th day of

February, 2010, that:

Action on the requested relief is DEFERRED. The court previously granted Defendant’s

request, submitted pro se, for an enlargement of time until February 1, 2010, in which to respond

to the first amended complaint (see Docs. 7, 8). The allotted time has now passed, and Defendant

has not responded.

In light of Defendant’s pro se status, however, the court will give him until MARCH 1,

2010, in which to respond to the first amended complaint. If Defendant does not plead or otherwise

defend this action by such date, the clerk shall enter a default against him, following which Plaintiff

may move for default judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a)(b).

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on Friday, February 23, 2007 at the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forest Headquarters office, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, WA. This meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and continue until 4 p.m. During this meeting Provincial Advisory Committee members will discuss Roadless Area considerations and potential Wilderness recommendations in conjunction with Forest Plan Revision for the Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests. All Eastern Washington Cascades and Yakima Province Advisory Committee meetings are open to the public.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Direct questions regarding this meeting to Paul Hart, Designated Federal                               ( print page 6197)                            Official, USDA, Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 98801, 509-644-9200.                    

Dated: February 5, 2007.

Paul Hart,

Designated Federal Official, Okanogan and Wenatchee National Forests.

[FR Doc. 07-582  Filed 2-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 10.132


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE AND 


WARRANT PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to the Convertible
Promissory Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”), dated as of July 9, 2014, between VG Life Sciences Inc.
(the “Company”) and DW Odell Company, LLC (“Investor”) is made and entered effective as of the August 14,
2014.


 


WITNESSETH:


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Investor
deem it necessary to remove reference to 50,000 shares of Series B Preferred Shares and a related section; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties hereto
deem it necessary and desirable to amend the Agreement pursuant to the terms of Section 1.1(c) and Section 4.3(iii-v) of the Agreement;
and


 


WHEREAS, the Company and Investor
have decided to amend the Agreement in certain respects as set forth below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of
the agreements contained herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereto do hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


 


1. The last sentence of Section 1.1(c)
is to be removed in its entirety to read:


 


(c) it will not be prepayable by
VGLS. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Investor may convert all or any portion of the Notes, solely at the option of the Investor,
except that the lock up restrictions remain in effect. The maturity date for all notes shall be July 9, 2016.


 


2. Subsections 4.3 (iii), 4.3 (iv), and 4.3
(v) are to be removed in their entirety to read:


 


4.3 Board Actions. The Company
shall have delivered to the Investor resolutions duly adopted by the Company's Board of Directors and, to the extent required by
applicable law or by the Company's Articles of Incorporation, the Company's Shareholders, and certified by the Secretary of the
Company (i) approving and authorizing the Company's execution and delivery of this Agreement, the Notes and the Warrants,
and the Company's performance thereunder, and (ii) authorizing the reservation of a sufficient number of shares of the Company's
Common Stock to permit the conversion of the Notes and to permit the exercise of the Warrants.


 


 


Acknowledged and agreed:


 


 


VG Life Sciences Inc.


 


 


/s/ Haig Keledjian


By: Haig Keledjian


Title: Chairman


 


DW Odell Company, LLC


 


 


/s/ David Odell


By: David Odell


Title: Managing Member
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

WILLIAM CORCORAN and

VINCENT RIVERA,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv303/RS-EMT

JOHN PALMER, et al,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10)

and Plaintiff Vincent Rivera’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. 9). 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. Plaintiff Vincent Rivera’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. 9) is granted,

and this case is dismissed without prejudice as to Plaintiff Rivera.

3. The claims of Plaintiff William Corcoran remain.

ORDERED on January 5, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**EXHIBIT 23.3**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors BPZ Resources, Inc. Houston, Texas

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.  333-170999, 333-162615, 333-126934, 333-153427 and 333-158337) and Form S-8 (No. 333-169209, 333-147461, 333-126388, and 333-147462) of BPZ Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reports dated March 16, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of BPZ Resources, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 

/s/ BDO USA, LLP

Houston, TX

March 16, 2011

 

----
#### STATE v. MELTON

No. 173 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 198.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1972.