alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

EMMETT STROMAS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv31/RV/EMT

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al., 

Defendants.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May 27, 2011 (Doc. 14). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed

objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

 reference in this order.

2 This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with

an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of June, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00031-RV-EMT Document 15 Filed 06/27/11 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             909,217
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   920,599
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,424,499
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              455,267
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            32,616
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,936,616
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,424,499
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   653,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (38,372)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (615,330)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (615,330)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (615,330)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.23)
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1848

EDWARD BERNARD MCKEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:22-cv-00409-BO-RN)

Submitted: January 30, 2024 Decided: February 2, 2024

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Bernard McKee, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Ryan, Assistant Attorney General, 

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1848 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward Bernard McKee appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s 

motion to dismiss McKee’s discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the 

Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. Upon review of the record, in 

conjunction with the arguments McKee raises in his informal brief, we discern no 

reversible error. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b); see also Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th 

Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our 

review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. McKee v. N.C. Dep’t of Env’t Quality, No. 5:22-cv-00409-BO-RN 

(E.D.N.C. filed July 13, 2023 & entered July 14, 2023). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1848 Doc: 13 Filed: 02/02/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2011165EN.01000301.xml

| 7.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/3

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.6203 — Western Digital Ireland/Viviti Technologies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 165/04

On 30 May 2011, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301 / 22967244) or by post, under reference COMP/M.6203 — Western Digital Ireland/Viviti Technologies, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0577 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RUSSELL DEAN KORTAN,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 24, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 16 2021

08/16/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0577
#### STATE v. WOOTEN

No. 35.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 193.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 31 August 1972.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

EMMETT STROMAS,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:10cv346-WS

JAMES OWENS, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 4)

docketed September 14, 2010. The magistrate judge recommends that this case be

dismissed for failure to state a claim. The plaintiff has filed no objections to the report

and recommendation.

The court has reviewed the record and has determined that the magistrate

judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 4) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order. 

2. The plaintiff's complaint and this case are DISMISSED. The plaintiff's

federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The plaintiff's
Page 2 of 2

state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1367(c)(3).

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of October , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Shengrui Resources Co. Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







Dated:  June 22,
2009





By:     /s/
Arthur Skagen


Arthur
Skagen


Chief Executive
Officer
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv378/MCR/CJK

WEST CUSTOMER MANAGEMENT

GROUP, LLC n/k/a WEST BUSINESS

SOLUTIONS, LLC,

Defendant.

 /

FINAL JUDGMENT

This action came before the Court for a jury trial with the undersigned presiding.

Following trial, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the Defendant on January 31, 2014.

Accordingly, final judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant, WEST

CUSTOMER SERVICE MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, with costs taxed against Plaintiff,

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION.

SO ORDERED this 4th day of February, 2014.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trevenex Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Hon Kit Wong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated:  May 6, 2010

By:  /s/ Hon Kit Wong

 

       Hon Kit Wong

 

       Chief Financial Officer 

 

       (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5288 

To delay the effective date of the rule issued by the National Credit Union 

Administration titled ‘‘Risk-Based Capital’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2018 

Mr. POSEY (for himself and Mr. HECK) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To delay the effective date of the rule issued by the National 

Credit Union Administration titled ‘‘Risk-Based Capital’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Common Sense Credit 

5 Union Capital Relief Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DELAY IN EFFECTIVE DATE. 

7 Notwithstanding any effective date set forth in the 

8 rule issued by the National Credit Union Administration 

9 titled ‘‘Risk-Based Capital’’ (published at 80 Fed. Reg. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5288 IH

1 66626 (October 29, 2015)), such final rule shall take ef2 fect on January 1, 2021. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Novagen Solar Inc. on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas E. Mills, Chief
Executive Officer, President, Principal Accounting Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


May 10, 2011



By     /s/ Thomas Mills
       Thomas E. Mills
       President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,
       Chief  Financial  Officer,  and
       Principal Accounting Officer
|                                 | •                                          |   | the      quarterly report for the quarter ended January 31, 2009 (the      “Form 10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,      and |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |                                             |
|                                 | •                                          |   | the      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                       |
|                                 |                                             |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |   |
|                                 |                                             |   |
|                                 |                                             |   |
|                                 |                                             |   |
|  March  23,      2009 | /s/      Stephen      Browand                    |   |
|                                 | Stephen      BrowandChief      Executive Officer |   |
|                                 |
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOHN B. HOLLAND,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO.: 3:10cv410/MCR/MD

WALTER MCNEIL,

Respondent.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated October 27, 2010. The petitioner has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The § 2254 petition (doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for

lack of jurisdiction.

3. The clerk is directed to close this file and send petitioner the Eleventh

Circuit’s form application for leave to file a second or successive petition.
Page 2 of 2

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of December, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case No: 3:10cv410/MCR/MD
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHASITY PERRY,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-52/RS-MD

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested in Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine (Doc. 51) is DENIED. 

Rulings regarding the admissibility of the disputed recording will be made at trial by way 

of proffer. 

ORDERED on November 29, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 5:11cv55-RH/EMT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ELLEM L. MORRIS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv55-RH/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DENIAL OF BENEFITS

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 13. No objections have been filed. Upon 

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The Commissioner’s decision denying the plaintiff’s application for 

disability benefits is AFFIRMED. The clerk must enter judgment and close the 

file.

SO ORDERED on May 21, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-00055-RH-EMT Document 14 Filed 05/21/12 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 73589]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-55526]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 772


Definitions of Terms

CFR Correction

    In Title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 300 to 799, 
revised as of January 1, 2007, on page 577, in Sec.  772.1, in the 
second column, the second definition of Production is removed.

[FR Doc. 07-55526 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2465 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2465

 To enact as law certain regulations relating to the taking of double-
                          crested cormorants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 11, 2019

  Mr. Cotton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To enact as law certain regulations relating to the taking of double-
                          crested cormorants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cormorant Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE TAKING OF DOUBLE-CRESTED 
              CORMORANTS.

    (a) Force and Effect.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to subsection (b), sections 21.47 
        and 21.48 of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (as in 
        effect on January 1, 2016), shall have the force and effect of 
        law.
            (2) Public notice.--The Secretary of the Interior, acting 
        through the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
        Service (referred to in this section as the ``Secretary''), 
        shall notify the public of the authority provided by paragraph 
        (1) in a manner determined to be appropriate by the Secretary.
    (b) Sunset.--The authority provided by subsection (a)(1) shall 
terminate on the effective date of a regulation promulgated by the 
Secretary after the date of enactment of this Act to control 
depredation of double-crested cormorant populations.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section limits the 
authority of the Secretary to promulgate regulations relating to the 
taking of double-crested cormorants under any other law.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Laufer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Richard Laufer Richard Laufer Title: Chief Executive Officer   August 1, 2008