alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5238 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5238

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1234 Saint Johns Place in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Major Robert 
                       Odell Owens Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2018

Ms. Clarke of New York (for herself, Mr. Zeldin, Mr. King of New York, 
Mr. Suozzi, Miss Rice of New York, Mr. Meeks, Ms. Meng, Ms. Velazquez, 
 Mr. Jeffries, Mr. Nadler, Mr. Donovan, Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New 
 York, Mr. Espaillat, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Serrano, Mr. Engel, Mrs. Lowey, 
    Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York, Mr. Faso, Mr. Tonko, Ms. 
 Stefanik, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Reed, Mr. Katko, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Higgins 
  of New York, and Mr. Collins of New York) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1234 Saint Johns Place in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Major Robert 
                       Odell Owens Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAJOR ROBERT ODELL OWENS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1234 Saint Johns Place in Brooklyn, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Major Robert Odell Owens Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major 
Robert Odell Owens Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 11, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 70222]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6006]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

32 CFR Part 68


Provision of Free Public Education for Eligible Children Pursuant 
to Section 6, Public Law 81-874

AGENCY: Department of Defense.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is removing 32 CFR Part 68, 
``Provision of Free Public Education for Eligible Children Pursuant to 
Section 6, Public Law 81-874.'' The part has served the purpose for 
which it was intended and is no longer valid.

DATES: Effective Date: December 11, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: L.M. Bynum, 703-696-4970.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD Directive 1342.16 was originally 
codified as 32 CFR Part 68. This Directive was canceled by DoD 
Directive 1342.20. Copies of DoD Directive 1342.20 may be obtained at 
http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/.

List of Subject in 32 CFR Part 68

    Elementary and secondary education, Government employees, Military 
personnel.

0
Accordingly, by the authority of 10 U.S.C. 301, title 32 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations is amended by removing part 68:

PART 68--[REMOVED]

    Dated: December 5, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 07-6006 Filed 12-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

HOME DESIGN SERVICES INC,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00006-MP-GRJ

KERMIT CONSTRUCTION, INC., NEW GENERATION HOME BUILDERS, INC., TONY S.

ROSS, ROBERT T SHEWEY, SHAWN BROWN d/b/a/ INNOVATIVE DESIGNS,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 40, a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice

regarding defendants KERMIT CONSTRUCTION, INC., NEW GENERATION HOME

BUILDERS, INC., TONY S. ROSS, and ROBERT T SHEWEY and Doc. 41, a Notice of

Voluntary Dismissal regarding defendant SHAWN BROWN d/b/a/ INNOVATIVE DESIGNS. 

Since Mr. Brown has neither answered the complaint nor filed a motion for summary judgment,

the plaintiff may dismiss the complaint against him without prejudice as a matter of right, under

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(I). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The claims against defendants KERMIT CONSTRUCTION, INC., NEW

GENERATION HOME BUILDERS, INC., TONY S. ROSS, and ROBERT T SHEWEY

are dismissed with prejudice. The claims against SHAWN BROWN d/b/a/

INNOVATIVE DESIGNS are dismissed without prejudice.

This terminates all claims against all defendants, and the Clerk is directed to close the

case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of August, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00006-MP-GRJ Document 42 Filed 08/31/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 8



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20F for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gordon Steblin, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Company.











Gordon Steblin

Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Application of William H. Peters, Respondent, against Herbert S. Sisson, as State Commissioner of Excise, Appellant.

*Matter of Peters*v. *Sisson,*183 App. Div. 286, affirmed.

(Argued May 27, 1918;

decided June 11, 1918.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 1, 1918, which reversed an order of Special Term denying an application for the resubmission to the electors of the town of New Hartford of questions of local option under the Liquor Tax Law and granted said application. Leading up to the submission of said questions to the electors of said town at the last general election a petition in due form was filed with the town clerk asking for the submission of said questions at such election. Said town clerk thereupon duly filed with the county clerk of Oneida county a certified copy of such petition, but the last named official took no action thereon, and gave no notice, either by publication or posting, of the impending submission. The town clerk with whom the petition was filed, acting upon his own initiative, procured from a printer and posted in a large number of public places in said town notices signed by himself as town clerk to the effect that all of said local option questions would be submitted to be voted upon by the electors of said town at said town meeting, and in due time, prior to said election, caused like notices signed by said town clerk to be published in the Utica *Daily Press*and in the Utica *Observer,*two newspapers in which a notice of such submission might properly be published. The Appellate Division held that the town clerk was not the proper officer to post and publish such notices and that under the statute the county clerk was charged with the performance of such duty; that the statute was mandatory and could not be disregarded.

*Porter L. 'Merriman*and *Harry D. Sanders*for appellant.

*Fred F. Scanlan*for respondent.

*555Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, McLaughlin and Andrews, JJ. Dissenting: Pound and Crane, JJ.
Case 1:07-cv-03578-PKC Document 2 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION 

BRICE BUILDING CO., INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 5-10-mc-4/RS-EMT 

WILLIAM DEL LEE, an individual, 

and TALMEDGE E. LEE, an individual, 

Defendants, 

and 

SUMMIT BANK,

Garnishee. 

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Plaintiff’s Motion for Writ of Garnishment and Appointment of 

Special Process Server (Doc. 50). 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Motion is GRANTED. 

2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 64 and 69, and Fla. Stat. § 77.01, et seq., the Clerk of 

the Court is directed to issue the Writ of Garnishment directed to the Garnishee, 

SUMMIT BANK. 
3. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.1(a), Mr. Charles Lance, an agent of L. Lance & 

Associates, LLC, is appointed as the special process server who shall serve the 

Writ of Garnishment. 

ORDERED on January 31, 2011

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

KATHERINE M. EILBECK,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 1:09CV182-MP/AK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Enlargement of Time to file

Memorandum. (Doc. 16). Having considered said motion, the Court is of the opinion

that it should be GRANTED, and Defendants shall have through February 22, 2010, to

file the responsive memorandum. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of January, 2010.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23

- 2157 LT Case No. 2016

- CF

- 001527

- C

_____________________________
K ELVON G RIMMAGE , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County. Robert Hodges, Judge.

Kelvon Grimmage, Live Oak, pro se.
No Appearance for Appellee.

November 17, 2023

P ER C URIAM

. This Court has previously denied Appellant’s claims raised in the subject motion on two separate occasions , including on the merits, and affirmed the postconviction court’s order denying relief, all stemming from Marion County Circuit Court Case N o. 2016

- C F

- 001527

- C. Because Appellant’s filings are abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous, Appellant is cautioned that any further pro se filings in this Court asserting claims stemming from2

Marion County Circuit Court Case No. 2016

- CF

- 001527

- C, may result in sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing s in this Court and

a referral to prison officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2023) ; State v. Spencer , 751 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 1999)

.
A PPELLANT C AUTIONED

.
M AKAR , E ISNAUGLE , and M AC I VER , JJ., concur.
# C_2009267EN.01000203.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/2

---

Appointment of the First Advocate General

2009/C 267/05

The Court of Justice appointed Mr Mengozzi as First Advocate General for a period of one year expiring on 6 October 2010, pursuant to the third subparagraph of Article 10(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 26 (Thursday, February 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 5985]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-560]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Sensorimotor Integration Study Section, February 20, 2007, 8 a.m. to 
February 20, 2007, 5 p.m., One Washington Circle Hotel, One Washington 
Circle, Washington, DC 20037 which was published in the Federal 
Register on January 18, 2007, 72 FR 2292-2294.
    The meeting will be held at The Fairmont Hotel, 2401 M Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20037. The meeting date and time remain the same. The 
meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: February 1, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-560 Filed 2-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```
# C_2011076EN.01001001.xml

| 10.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 76/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 76/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6134 — Bouygues/Heijmans UK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 76/04

On 1 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6134. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6134. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2009312EN.01000101.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 312/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 312/1

---

2009/C 312/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 297, 5.12.2009

OJ C 297, 5.12.2009

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 282, 21.11.2009

OJ C 267, 7.11.2009

OJ C 256, 24.10.2009

OJ C 244, 10.10.2009

OJ C 233, 26.9.2009

OJ C 220, 12.9.2009

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
# C_2013044EN.01016001.xml

| 15.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/160 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/160

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Amendment to the Commission proposal COM(2011) 627 final/3 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)’

COM(2012) 553 final — 2012/0282 (COD)

2013/C 44/31

On 22 October, the European Parliament and on 24 October 2012, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Amendment to the Commission proposal COM(2011) 627 final/3 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)

Amendment to the Commission proposal COM(2011) 627 final/3 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD)

COM(2012) 553 final — 2012/0282 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 485th plenary session of 12 and 13 December 2012 (meeting of 12 December), by 137 votes with 4 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 12 December 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 23 (b)


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-37652, 333-64504, 333-64504-01, 333-64504-02, 333-71004, 333-71004-01,
333-71004-02, 333-84418, 333-84418-01 and 333-84418-02 on Form S-3 of TXU Corp.
and Registration Statements Nos. 333-32833, 333-32837, 333-32843, 333-45657,
333-46671, 333-79627 as amended by Post Effective Amendment No. 1 thereto,
333-93183, 333-62016, 333-62014, 333-86640 and 333-92260 on Form S-8 of TXU
Corp. of our report dated February 14, 2003 (which includes explanatory
paragraphs relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 142 as described in Note 2 of the Notes to the Financial
Statements and the discontinuance of European operations as described in Note 3
of the Notes to the Financial Statements), appearing in TXU Corp.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 11, 2003
Reduce your dust exposure

Clean dust from work clothes

Did you know?

Using clothes cleaning technology 

throughout the workday can reduce your 

exposure to respirable dust by up to 88%

Launder clothes post-shift, including 

sweatshirts and coats, and use leather 

(not cloth) gloves to avoid dust buildup 

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational

Safety and Health

Findings based on NIOSH field studies

To learn more, visit go.usa.gov/xRkXu
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 13, 2017

d1010 

# Order

Clerk October 13, 2017

156434

In re ALLEN, Minors. SC: 156434

COA: 336285

Wayne CC Family Division:

07

- 470130

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 10, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions present ed should be reviewed by this Court.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

EUGENE LONG,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:10cv429/MCR/MD

J.A. BOWMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Thiscause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated December 6, 2010. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:01-cr-00093-RV   Document 31   Filed 07/02/09   Page 1 of 2

Case 3:01-cr-00093-RV   Document 31   Filed 07/02/09   Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on April 30, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), VSI Alliance has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Canadian Microelectronics Corp., Kingston, Ontario, CANADA; and UMC, Hsinchu City, TAIWAN have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and VSI Alliance intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 29, 1996, VSI Alliance filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on March 4, 1997 (62 FR 9812).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 12, 2007. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 26, 2007 (72 FR 8402).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-5557 Filed 11-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M