alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010191EN.01000301.xml

| 15.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5827 — ELIA/IFM/50HERTZ)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 191/02

On 10 May 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5827. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5827. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2009185EN.01000302.xml

| 7.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5480 — Deutsche Bahn/PCC Logistics)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 185/03

On 12 June 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5480. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5480. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DOUGLAS LOWERY, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv456/MCR/EMT

LAURA SPENCER COLEMAN,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated February 14, 2011 (Doc. 12). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2011148EN.01000101.xml

| 19.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 May 2011

(2011/C 148/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4227 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4573 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88065 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9840 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2545 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9360 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,505 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,03 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9263 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1191 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2534 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3441 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3860 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0614 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8079 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7697 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 547,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8562 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2542 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4125 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 180,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3165 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,477 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,9070 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,065 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3036 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6891 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,1000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4227

JPY

Japanese yen

115,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4573

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88065

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9840

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2545

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9360

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,505

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,03

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9263

RON

Romanian leu

4,1191

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2534

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3441

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3860

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0614

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8079

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7697

KRW

South Korean won

1 547,56

ZAR

South African rand

9,8562

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2542

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4125

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 180,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3165

PHP

Philippine peso

61,477

RUB

Russian rouble

39,9070

THB

Thai baht

43,065

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3036

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6891

INR

Indian rupee

64,1000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2011198EN.01001801.xml

| 6.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/18

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

2011/C 198/09

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| | EPSO/AD/216/11 — Czech-language (CS) translators (AD 5) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/216/11 — Czech-language (CS) translators (AD 5)

| | EPSO/AD/217/11 — Hungarian-language (HU) translators (AD 5) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/217/11 — Hungarian-language (HU) translators (AD 5)

| | EPSO/AD/218/11 — Lithuanian-language (LT) translators (AD 5) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/218/11 — Lithuanian-language (LT) translators (AD 5)

| | EPSO/AD/219/11 — Maltese-language (MT) translators (AD 5) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/219/11 — Maltese-language (MT) translators (AD 5)

| | EPSO/AD/220/11 — Polish-language (PL) translators (AD 5) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/220/11 — Polish-language (PL) translators (AD 5)

| | EPSO/AD/221/11 — Slovak-language (SK) translators (AD 5) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/221/11 — Slovak-language (SK) translators (AD 5)

The competition notice is published in Official Journal C 198 A of 6 July 2011 in Czech, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish and Slovak only.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, Stroke Prevention/Intervention 
Program.
    Date: November 30, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Ritz Carlton, Atlanta, 181 Peachtree Street, NE., 
Atlanta, GA 30303.
    Contact Person: Shanta Rajaram, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NIH/NINDS/Neuroscience 
Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, Msc 9529, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-6033, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1664777c7764777b65567b777f7a38787f7e38717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f587949f9487949886b598949c99db9b9c9ddb929a83">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 1, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5614 Filed 11-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DARRELL THORNTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3333

Opinion filed January 6, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Clay County.

John H. Skinner, Judge.

Darrell Thornton, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 26, 

2016, the Court has determined that the appeal is untimely. Accordingly, the appeal is 

dismissed. The Court notes that appellant’s petition seeking belated appeal of the lower

tribunal’s March 29, 2016, Order Denying Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction 

Relief is currently being considered by the Court in case number 1D16-4615.

OSTERHAUS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Dkt. 3:01CR84-001/LAC

 

RONALD B. BUTLER 

 

ORDER CONTINUING SUPERVISION

THIS MATTER CAME on to be heard on July 11, 2007; there appearing Assistant U.S.

Attorney Randall J. Hensel; and the defendant, Ronald B. Butler; appearing in person with counsel,

Assistant Federal Public Defender Thomas S. Keith, Esquire; and after receiving testimony, the Court

did find the defendant to be in violation of supervised release of violations #1and #2 as outlined in the

Petition. The Court orders the defendant to be continued under supervision with a new termination

of supervised release date to be calculated after Butler’s release from the County Jail (Work Release)

sentence he is currently serving in Escambia County Circuit Court DKT #06-4047. All original

conditions of supervised release remain in full force and effect with the following added special

condition:

Special Condition #1 “The defendant shall participate in the home detention program for a

period of 3 months which will begin upon his release from the

Escambia County Work Release Facility. During this time, the

defendant will remain at his place of residence except for employment

and other activities approved in advance by the supervising U.S.

Probation Officer. The defendant will be subject to the standard

conditions of home detention withoutelectronic monitoring adopted for

use in the Northern District of Florida.” 

DONE AND ORDERED in Open Court at Pensacola, Florida, this 11th day of July, 2007.

s/L.A. Collier 

The Honorable Lacey A. Collier

Senior U.S. District Judge

Date Signed: July 13, 2007 

Case 3:01-cr-00084-LC Document 36 Filed 07/13/07 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009223EN.01001102.xml

| 16.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5518 — Fiat/Chrysler)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 223/04

On 24 July 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5518. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5518. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2010340EN.01000501.xml

| 15.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6057 — Carlyle/Commscope)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 340/05

On 9 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6057. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6057. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joel Stohlman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Joel Stohlman Joel Stohlman Title: Chief Executive Officer   August 18, 2009
IB 

Union Calendar No. 543 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5317 

[Report No. 115–703] 

To repeal section 2141 of the Revised Statutes to remove the prohibition 

on certain alcohol manufacturing on Indian lands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2018 

Ms. HERRERA BEUTLER (for herself, Mr. KILMER, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. 

HECK, and Mr. COLE) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

MAY 24, 2018 

Additional sponsor: Ms. MCCOLLUM

MAY 24, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5317 RH

A BILL 

To repeal section 2141 of the Revised Statutes to remove 

the prohibition on certain alcohol manufacturing on Indian lands. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5317 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN ALCO4 HOL MANUFACTURING ON INDIAN LANDS. 

5 Section 2141 of the Revised Statutes (25 U.S.C. 251) 

6 is repealed. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 543 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5317 

[Report No. 115–703] 

A BILL 

To repeal section 2141 of the Revised Statutes to 

facturing on Indian lands. remove the prohibition on certain alcohol manuMAY 24, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |                                                       |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: October 13, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Rodger D. Spainhower, Sr.                         |   |
|                        |   | Name: Rodger D. Spainhower, Sr.                            |   |
|                        |   | Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                        |   |                                                       |   |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORP., 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-32/RS-CJK

FAYE JOHNSON, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

UAMAMENDED ORDER

From the pleadings, it appears that common questions of law or fact are involved 

in the five trademark infringement suits filed in this Court: Slep-Tone Entertainment 

Corp. v. David Morgan, et al., Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. Kara-O-King Inc., et 

al., Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. Faye Johnson, et al., Slep-Tone Entertainment 

Corp. v. Arther Allen, et al., and Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. Tequila Mexico of 

Pensacola Inc., et al. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42 (a) (2), and with the consent of Chief 

Judge Casey Rodgers and Senior Judge Stephan Mickle, the five cases shall be 

consolidated and assigned to me. In addition, pursuant to Fla. N.D. Loc. R. 3.1(C), the 

venue for the Pensacola and Gainesville cases shall be transferred to the Panama City 

division. 

Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 66 Filed 08/29/11 Page 1 of 2
IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Clerk shall consolidate cases 1:10cv207-SPM/GRJ, 5:10cv71-RS/CJK, 

5:11cv32-RS/CJK, 5:11cv69-RS/EMT, and 3:11cv191-MCR/EMT. 

2. The Clerk shall file a copy of this Order in each of these cases. 

3. All future pleadings should be filed only in case 5:11cv32-RS/CJK. 

4. The Motion to Set Aside the Scheduling Order (Doc. 29) in 5:11cv69 is 

GRANTED. A new scheduling order will be forthcoming for the consolidated 

cases. 

ORDERED on August 29, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:11-cv-00032-RS-CJK Document 66 Filed 08/29/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TERRY L. ROBINSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-99-MW-GRJ

PAIGE A. AUGUSTINE,

WARDEN, FCI MARIANNA,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On June 27, 2013, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause before July 11,

2013, as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Order,

like a previous Order mailed to Plaintiff in December 2012, was returned as

undeliverable. (Docs. 25, 27.) The Federal Bureau of Prison’s inmate locator website

reflects that Petitioner was released from custody on November 27, 2012. Petitioner

has not yet filed a change of address with the Court despite his release from custody

last year. Because Petitioner is no longer in custody, he has achieved all of the relief

which he requested in the Petition and to which he would have been entitled had this

Court granted his petition. The action is therefore moot unless there are collateral

consequences that arise from Petitioner’s conviction. Minor v. Dugger, 864 F.2d 124,

125 (11 Cir. 1989) (citations omitted). th

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case should be
Page 2 of 2

dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

IN CHAMBERS, at Gainesville, Florida, this 17 day of July 2013.

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No: 5:11-cv-99-MW-GRJ