alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

STEVEN B. SLADE and 

ROBIN S. SLADE, individually 

and on behalf of all others

 similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 4:11cv5-SPM/WCS

LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL C.

CONSUEGRA, P.L., a Florida

limited liability company,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ON NOTICE OF CONFLICT WITH TRIAL PERIOD

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Defendant’s

Notice of Conflict of Trial (doc. 18). Counsel for Defendant shall advise this

Court in writing on August 22, 2011, if the conflict noted still exists.

DONE ORDERED this 25th day of March, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-41171

MICHAEL GARRETT,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:17-CV-337

Before ELROD, GRAVES, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Michael Garrett, Texas prisoner # 697364, moves this court for 

authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) following the district court’s 

dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. Garrett has failed to show that he 

should be allowed to proceed IFP on appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) or that 

his appeal of the district court’s judgment presents a nonfrivolous issue. See 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 11, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-41171 Document: 00514507935 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2018
No. 17-41171

2

Baños v. O’Guin, 144 F.3d 883, 885 (5th Cir. 1998); Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 

562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Garrett’s motion for leave to proceed IFP is denied.

The facts surrounding the IFP decision are inextricably intertwined with 

the merits of the appeal. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th 

Cir. 1997). The appeal presents no nonfrivolous issues and is dismissed as 

frivolous. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

MOTION TO PROCEED IFP ON APPEAL DENIED; APPEAL 

DISMISSED.

 Case: 17-41171 Document: 00514507935 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/11/2018
# C_2010276EN.01000201.xml

| 13.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 October 2010

2010/C 276/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3833 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4569 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87360 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2460 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3298 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1240 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,524 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,85 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9640 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2743 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9659 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4076 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4023 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7350 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8334 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8083 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 561,58 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5572 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2313 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3247 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 365,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3000 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,477 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,6800 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,437 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3106 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2359 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,7846 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3833

JPY

Japanese yen

113,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4569

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87360

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2460

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3298

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1240

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,524

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,85

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9640

RON

Romanian leu

4,2743

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9659

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4076

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4023

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7350

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8334

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8083

KRW

South Korean won

1 561,58

ZAR

South African rand

9,5572

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2313

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3247

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 365,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3000

PHP

Philippine peso

60,477

RUB

Russian rouble

41,6800

THB

Thai baht

41,437

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3106

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2359

INR

Indian rupee

61,7846

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ANTHONY MARKIECE JACKSON, 

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:11cv83/MCR/CJK

WALTER MCNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

filed on November 7, 2012 (doc. 14), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is adopted as

the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for plaintiff’s failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of February, 2013.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:01cr90/RV

 3:03cv357/RV/MD

KENNETH WAYNE SINKFIELD

 

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated January 3, 2005. The defendant previously has been furnished

a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2255 (doc. 61) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of April, 2005.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:01-cr-00090-RV-MD Document 81 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shengrui Resources Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  September 14, 2009





By:       /s/ Arthur Skagen


Arthur Skagen


Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-147024 and No. 333-194338) and Form S-8 (No. 333-148085, No. 333-148754 and No. 333-154795) of
XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. of our report dated March 30, 2017 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form
20-F/A.



|Tel Aviv, Israel | /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman                                    
|---------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|March30, 2017    |                                                              
|                 | Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)                          
|                 | A member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<MULTIPLIER>     1
       
<S>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                   6,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              18,450
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8,450 
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     18,450
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0 
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        0  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0  
                                           

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HPC POS System, Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Dated:  March 31, 2011   /s/ Melvin W. Coles Melvin W. Coles Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

TERESA D. HUGHES, 

Plaintiff,

vs. 1:10-cv-00154-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion For Enlargement Of Time. (Doc.

16.) Defendant requests a thirty day extension of time to file his response to Plaintiff’s

Memorandum. The current deadline for filing Defendant’s response memorandum is

April 5, 2011. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(B), Defendant’s counsel certifies that

Plaintiff’s counsel does not object to the requested relief. 

Accordingly, upon due consideration, Defendant’s Motion For Enlargement Of

Time (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file his response memorandum by May

5, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4 day of April, 2011. th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
No. 12298 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

1972 

THE STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Respondent, 

-VS - 

KENNETH LUCERO, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

Appeal from: District Court of the Second Judicial District, 

Honorable John B. McClernan, Judge presiding. 

Counsel of Record : 

For Appellant : 

Mark P, Sullivan argued, Butte, Montana. 

For Respondent: 

Larry J. Stimatz argued, County Attorney, Butte, Montana. 

Robert L, Woodahl, Attorney General, Helena, Montana. 

J. C. Weingartner argued, Assistant Attorney General, 

Helena, Montana. 

Submitted: June 13, 1972 
Mr. Chief Justice James T. Harrison delivered the Opinion of 

the Court. 

This is an appeal by Kenneth Lucero from his conviction 

of second degree assault by a jury in Silver Bow County, Montana. 

While Lucero had a separate trial, it was practically identical 

to the trial of Levi Campbell in the witnesses that testified 

and the evidence presented. Because of this similarity the 

statement of facts in the opinion of State v. Campbell, - Mont . 

-1 - P.2d -1 - St.Rep. - (Cause No. 12232) will serve 

for the statement of facts in this cause. 

Lucero, as the sole issue of his appeal, raises the question of whether venue was properly proved. This issue was also 

raised in the appeal of bvi Campbell but unlike Campbell's 

case the issue is totally without merit in this case. In Campbell we held that venue like any other material fact in a criminal case could be proved by the use of either direct or circumstantial evidence. In the case of Campbell circumstantial evidence 

was used to prove the venue of the crime. In this case venue 

was proved by the direct testimony of one witness. The official 

transcript of the trial as part of the record on appeal contains 

the following rebuttal testimony by John Whalen. 

"Q. You are the same John Whalen who previously testified in this case? A. Yes. 

"Q. Now this is rebuttal and I don't want you to be repeating everything or going over too much on what you testified 

to on direct examination. If you get off the track, I may 

interrupt you. Now we are talking about the events that happened 

at the Dutch Inn Bar, August 7, 1971. Where is the Dutch Inn? 

A. On the corner of Main Street and Silver Street. 

"Q. That's in Butte? A. Yes. 
"Q. Silver Bow County? A. yes." 

Therefore we hold that venue was properly proved by the above 

testimony. 

As heretofore stated, the trial record in this cause is 

practically identical with that in State v. Campbell, and in 

that cause other challenges were made to the trial proceedings. 

With that in mind we have examined the record here as to each 

error contended in the Campbell case which might be applicable 

here, and we find that our rulings on such matters here would 

be similar to our rulings 

The judgment of con 
We concur: 

-.-- c 5J-1, ,,,,,,. ,-,,,,,,,,,+,,~lk,,---------- 

Associate Justices
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DERRICK DEVON GRIFFIN,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv367/MCR/MD

WALTER A. MCNEIL,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on November 29, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) as malicious.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, William R. Willard, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
InfoSpi, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of InfoSpi, Inc.


Date: 11/12/08                         By: /s/ William R. Willard
                                          --------------------------------------
                                       Name:  William R. Willard
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2011032EN.01002101.xml

| 1.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/21

---

Call for proposals under the work programme of the seventh EC framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities

2011/C 32/15

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the work programmes of the seventh framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call in the Cooperation specific programme: Information and Communication Technologies: FP7-ICT-2011-SME-DCL.

Cooperation specific programme: Information and Communication Technologies: FP7-ICT-2011-SME-DCL.

Call documentation including deadline and budget is given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 68590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5930]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Health and Healthcare 
Trajectories.
    Date: December 11, 2007.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Marita R. Hopmann, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health, and Human Development, 6100 Building, Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6911, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#751d1a0518141b1b183518141c195b1b1c1d5b121a03"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e06011e030f0000032e030f07024000070640090118">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 27, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5930 Filed 12-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>