alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009300EN.01000101.xml

| 10.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 December 2009

2009/C 300/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4768 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4416 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90460 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4995 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5114 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4650 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,749 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,71 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7076 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1336 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2449 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2173 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6222 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5643 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4461 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0709 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0526 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 715,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1630 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0830 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2640 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 975,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0189 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,410 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,8737 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,993 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5953 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,0876 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,7743 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4768

JPY

Japanese yen

129,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4416

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90460

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4995

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5114

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4650

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,749

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,71

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7076

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1336

RON

Romanian leu

4,2449

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2173

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6222

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5643

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4461

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0709

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0526

KRW

South Korean won

1 715,20

ZAR

South African rand

11,1630

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0830

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2640

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 975,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0189

PHP

Philippine peso

68,410

RUB

Russian rouble

44,8737

THB

Thai baht

48,993

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5953

MXN

Mexican peso

19,0876

INR

Indian rupee

68,7743

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DENISE WANDA McGEE,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv167-RH/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 19. No objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The Commissioner’s decision denying the plaintiff’s application for

disability benefits is AFFIRMED. The clerk must enter judgment and close the

file.

SO ORDERED on July 30, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00167-RH-EMT Document 20 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TAMMY EZSOL,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv97-RH/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DENIAL OF BENEFITS

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 26. No objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The Commissioner’s decision denying the plaintiff’s application for 

Case 5:10-cv-00097-RH-EMT Document 27 Filed 08/04/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

disability benefits is AFFIRMED. The clerk must enter judgment and close the

file.

SO ORDERED on August 4, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case No: 5:10cv97-RH/EMT

Case 5:10-cv-00097-RH-EMT Document 27 Filed 08/04/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009036EN.01000302.xml

| 13.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5358 — Arizona Chemical GMBH/Abieta Chemie GMBH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 36/03)

On 16 January 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5358. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5358. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ROCIO CARMEN SISKA

ALEXANDER, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-209-RS-CJK

JAN FREDERICK LUBBE, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 39). 

No objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED with prejudice under 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for lack of jurisdiction and for 

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on July 20, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00209-RS-CJK Document 46 Filed 07/20/12 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         31,058
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  205,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               236,108
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 236,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          446,208
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,378,223
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,588,323)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   236,108
<SALES>                                        142,088
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,088
<CGS>                                          22,958
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               414,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (295,273)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (295,273)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (295,273)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WINNIE THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv318/RV/EMT

CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER OF RECUSAL

I hereby recuse myself from all further proceedings in this case. The Clerk shall

reassign this matter to another judge of this Court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of August, 2010.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge
Page 1 of 3

Case No. 4:09cv351-RH/WCS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RON MILLER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:09cv351-RH/WCS

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING THE PETITION AND

DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

This petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before 

the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF No. 21. No 

objections have been filed. The report and recommendation is correct and is 

adopted as the court’s opinion.

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires a district court to 

“issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to 

the applicant.” Under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability may 

issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-38 (2003); 

Case 4:09-cv-00351-RH-WCS Document 22 Filed 02/21/12 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 4:09cv351-RH/WCS

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000); Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 

893 n.4 (1983); see also Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 402-13 (2000) (setting 

out the standards applicable to a § 2254 petition on the merits). As the Court said 

in Slack:

 To obtain a COA under § 2253(c), a habeas prisoner must make a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a 

demonstration that, under Barefoot, includes showing that reasonable 

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition 

should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues 

presented were “ ‘adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed 

further.’ ” 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 483-84 (quoting Barefoot, 463 U.S. at 893 n.4). Further, in 

order to obtain a certificate of appealability when dismissal is based on procedural 

grounds, a petitioner must show, “at least, that jurists of reason would find it 

debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court 

was correct in its procedural ruling.” Id. at 484. 

The petitioner has not made the required showing. 

For these reasons,

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED.

2. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The petition is DENIED with 

prejudice.” 

Case 4:09-cv-00351-RH-WCS Document 22 Filed 02/21/12 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 4:09cv351-RH/WCS

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on February 19, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:09-cv-00351-RH-WCS Document 22 Filed 02/21/12 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6397

SAMUEL A. WILDER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DOUG CATOE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CA-00-3257) Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Samuel A. Wilder, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Samuel A. Wilder seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wilder v. Catoe , No. CA-00- 3257 (D.S.C. Feb. 8, 2002). We further deny Wilder’s motion for a preliminary injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-25-1999
<CASH>                                         346,913
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,050,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                   346,000
<INVENTORY>                                 18,320,862
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,635,520
<PP&E>                                       3,792,113
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,636,186
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,684,909
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,748,199
<BONDS>                                      7,148,085
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,905,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,684,909
<SALES>                                     40,101,544
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,101,544
<CGS>                                       25,813,186
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,415,392
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             379,324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (693,172)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (693,172)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)


</TABLE>
# C_2009303EN.01001901.xml

| 15.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/19

---

Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

2009/C 303/08

OJ C 10 of 15.1.2009

History of previous publications:

History of previous publications:

| | OJ C 208 of 15.8.2008 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 208 of 15.8.2008

| | OJ C 207 of 14.8.2008 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 207 of 14.8.2008

| | OJ C 202 of 8.8.2008 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 202 of 8.8.2008

| | OJ C 196 of 2.8.2008 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 196 of 2.8.2008

| | OJ C 194 of 31.7.2008 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 194 of 31.7.2008

| | OJ C 188 of 25.7.2008 |
| --- | --- |

OJ C 188 of 25.7.2008

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 26 (Thursday, February 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 5984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-565]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the PubMed Central National Advisory Committee.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: PubMed Central National Advisory Committee.
    Date: April 19, 2007.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: Review and Analysis of Systems.
    Place: National Library of Medicine, Building 38, Board Room, 
2nd Floor, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20894.
    Contact Person: David J. Lipman, MD., Director, Natl Ctr for 
Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Building 
38, Room 8N805, Bethesda, MD 20894, 301-435-5985, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92f6fefbe2fff3fcd2fff3fbfebcfcfbfabcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e2a22273e232f200e232f27226020272660292138">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance onto the NIH campus. All visitor vehicles, 
including taxicabs, hotel, and airport shuttles will be inspected 
before being allowed on campus. Visitors will be asked to show one 
form of identification (for example, a government-issued photo ID, 
driver's license, or passport) and to state the purpose of their 
visit.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/about/nac.html, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.879, 
Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: February 2, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-565 Filed 2-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2009219EN.01001801.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/18

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 September 2009

2009/C 219/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4594 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4431 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87390 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2128 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5137 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6340 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,488 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,33 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7023 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1925 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2800 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1865 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6908 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5728 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3106 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0660 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0752 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 781,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0648 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9662 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3300 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 468,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0970 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,528 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,8015 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,554 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6442 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5779 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,7440 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4594

JPY

Japanese yen

132,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4431

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87390

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2128

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5137

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6340

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,488

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,33

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7023

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1925

RON

Romanian leu

4,2800

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1865

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6908

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5728

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3106

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0660

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0752

KRW

South Korean won

1 781,26

ZAR

South African rand

11,0648

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9662

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3300

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 468,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0970

PHP

Philippine peso

70,528

RUB

Russian rouble

44,8015

THB

Thai baht

49,554

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6442

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5779

INR

Indian rupee

70,7440

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IVAN HARVEY,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:09cv402-WS

EFIONG O. ANDEM, ET AL.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 8)

docketed September 14, 2009. The magistrate judge recommends that the

plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (doc. 3) be denied. The plaintiff has filed

objections to the report and recommendation. 

Upon review of the record in light of the plaintiff's objections, the court has

determined that the recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:09cv402-WS

2. The plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (doc. 3) is DENIED.

3. The clerk is directed to return the file to the magistrate judge for further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of October , 2009.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE