alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DELBERT JAMES STRENGTH,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-24-00104-CR

Appeal from the

119th District Court

of Runnels County, Texas

(TC# 7177)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal and 

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed. We therefore dismiss 

the appeal. We further order this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2024.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
**Exhibit 10(ee)**

**AMENDMENT TO EFH SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN**

Pursuant to the authority of the Board of Directors of Energy Future Holdings Corp., and the provisions of Section 5.1 thereof, the EFH Second Supplemental Retirement Plan (“Plan”), as amended and restated as ofOctober 10, 2007, is hereby amended in the following respects only, effective as of February 19, 2009: 

(1)Section 2.5 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“2.5“Committee” shall mean the Non-Qualified Plan Committee whose members are appointed from time to time by the Board of Directors or the Chief Executive of the Company.” 

(2) Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“5.1 The Board of Directors shall be vested with full power and authority to amend the Plan or to terminate the Plan atany time. Further, the Committee may amend the Plan at any time; *provided, however,*that the authority of the Committee to amend the Plan shall be limited to amendments consistent with the following criteria: (i) the amendment isadministrative or ministerial in nature; (ii) the amendment does not result in a material change to the Plan’s funding or costs (a plan change is considered material if the amendment has a cost greater than $1 million to the Plan, asdetermined by the Committee in its sole discretion exercised in good faith); or (iii) the Plan amendment is dictated by statute or regulation. However, no act of amendment or termination shall reduce any Benefit accrued to the date such act isadopted. Furthermore, if the Plan is terminated, amended, or frozen or any other action is taken to limit future Benefit accruals under the Plan, or in the event of a Change in Control, each of the Participating Employers hall be obligated to takeall action as may be provided for under the Trust Agreement, the Second Trust Agreement or any other agreement affecting, in any way, the funding and/or securitization and the current or future payment of Benefits.” 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as conclusive evidence of the adoption of the foregoing instrumentAmendment to the EFH Second Supplemental Retirement Plan, the Board of Directors of Energy Future Holdings Corp. has caused these presents to be duly executed in the name and on the behalf of Energy Future Holdings Corp. by an authorized officerthereof, thereunto duly authorized this 31st day of July, 2009. 

 
**ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP.**
/s/ M. Rizwan Chand
M. Rizwan Chand,
Executive Vice President, Human Resources

& Administration

 

2
# C_2009043EN.01000601.xml

| 21.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 February 2009

(2009/C 43/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2591 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4501 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88100 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0728 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4921 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7495 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,810 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7063 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7495 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2850 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1585 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9746 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5911 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7631 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4957 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9359 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 903,67 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,8400 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6087 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4726 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 235,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6291 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,760 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,5664 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,994 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9970 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,5969 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,4830 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2591

JPY

Japanese yen

118,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4501

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88100

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0728

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4921

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7495

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

28,810

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7063

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7495

RON

Romanian leu

4,2850

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1585

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9746

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5911

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7631

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4957

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9359

KRW

South Korean won

1 903,67

ZAR

South African rand

12,8400

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6087

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4726

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 235,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6291

PHP

Philippine peso

60,760

RUB

Russian rouble

45,5664

THB

Thai baht

44,994

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9970

MXN

Mexican peso

18,5969

INR

Indian rupee

62,4830

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KAYLE WALKER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv290/RS-EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner

of Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27). No

objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. Defendant’s Motion To Remand (Doc. 26) is granted. The

Commissioner’s decision denying benefits is reversed.

3. This case is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g).

4. Defendant is ordered to conduct further proceedings in accordance with

the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation.

5. The clerk is directed to enter final judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58.

6. The clerk is directed to close this file administratively.

Case 5:10-cv-00290-RS-EMT Document 28 Filed 11/07/11 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED on November 7, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00290-RS-EMT Document 28 Filed 11/07/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

CHRISTOPHER M. WARNER, and

PATRICIA ANN MURRAY, Individually

and on behalf of their Marital

Community,

Appellants,

v.

SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES d/b/a/

SWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER/FIRST

HILL and SWEDISH ORTHOPEDIC

INSTITUTE,

Respondents,

and

PROLIANCE SURGEONS, INC., P.S.,

d/b/a ORTHOPEDIC PHYSICIAN

ASSOCIATES; ALEXIS FALICOV, M.D.,

Ph.D.; and JUSTIN L ESTERBERG,

M.D.,

Defendants.

NO. 73118-1-1

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: February 1,2016

-T(

Lau, J. — In this corporate negligence case, Christopher Warner sued Swedish

Health Services claiming personal injuries related to its alleged failure to establish a

neuromonitoring credentialing process and related policies and procedures governing

remote neuromonitoring at the time of his spinal surgery. The trial court dismissed the

corporate negligence claim on Swedish's summary judgment motion, reasoning that his

medical experts failed to establish the applicable standard of care.
No. 73118-1-1/2

This court reviews summary judgment orders de novo, considering the evidence

and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving

party—in this case Warner. Keck v. Collins. 184 Wn.2d 358, 370, 357 P.3d 1080

(2015). Summary judgment is appropriate only when no genuine issue exists as to any

material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. CR 56(c);

Keck. 184 Wn.2d at 370. An issue of material fact is genuine ifthe evidence is sufficient

for a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the nonmoving party. Keck. 184 Wn.2d at

370.

At oral argument before this court, Swedish properly conceded that Warner's

expert witness declarations and deposition testimony from Dr. Ney and Dr. Tarlov were

sufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact.1 We agree. Our review of the

record shows Warner submitted sufficient expert witness evidence to overcome

summary judgment. We reverse the trial court's order granting summary judgment of

dismissal and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

WE CONCUR:

iWh

^ ^f^

1At oral argument, Swedish stated that Keck v. Collins, "eroded and in fact

lowered the threshold such that Mr. Warner's expert declarations would probably pass

muster on the summary judgment standard when viewed in the light most favorable to

Mr. Warner." Wash. Court of Appeals oral argument, Warner v. Swedish Health

Services, etal.. No. 73118-1-1 (Jan. 7, 2016), at 10 min., 1 sec. (on file with court).

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5205 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5205

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           December 12, 2018

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, as the ``Sergeant Kenneth Eric 
                         Bostic Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT KENNETH ERIC BOSTIC POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
# C_2009172EN.01001201.xml

| 24.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/12

---

VACANCY NOTICE FOR POST OF DIRECTOR OF EUROPEAN POLICE COLLEGE (CEPOL)

VACANCY NOTICE FOR POST OF DIRECTOR OF EUROPEAN POLICE COLLEGE

2009/C 172/07

We are looking for a well educated and skilled professional with experience as manager and knowledge of education and training to head CEPOL Secretariat, based in Bramshill, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

We are looking for a well educated and skilled professional with experience as manager and knowledge of education and training to head CEPOL Secretariat, based in Bramshill, Hampshire, United Kingdom.

The aim of CEPOL is to support police cooperation by organising training and exchange programme for senior police officers from the European Union.

CEPOL is an EU agency, and function as a network by bringing together the national training institutes in the Member States whose tasks include the training of senior police officers. The Secretariat headed by the Director, deals with educational, administrative, financial and logistical support and has around 30 staff, including project staff.

The post holder will be responsible for providing support and advice to the Chair and members of the Governing Board and Committees. The Director will supervise the preparation of the Annual Work Programme, the Annual Budget, the Annual Report and the Annual Activity Report. The Director will negotiate cooperation agreements and represent CEPOL in appropriate EU policing and educational organs.

Since the EU Staff Regulations apply, applicants inter alia must be a national of one of the Member States of the EU and must have through knowledge of one of the languages of the Communities and satisfactory knowledge of a second language of the Communities. English is the working language of CEPOL. The successful applicant will be required to undergo local security clearance. CEPOL is an equal opportunities employer and takes great care to avoid any form of discrimination on any ground.

The closing day of applications is 60 days after this advert has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The Vacancy Notice is published in English only.

The closing day of applications is 60 days after this advert has been published in the Official Journal of the European Union

For further information and the application pack, visit the Vacancy Section of CEPOL’s website www.cepol.europa.eu

Further enquires should be made by e-mail only to swedishpresidency.cepol@phs.police.se, attention: Ms Ebba Sverne Arvill, Chair of the Governing Board.

| CEPOL — European Police College |
| --- |
| CEPOL House |
| Bramshill, Hook |
| Hampshire |
| RG27 0JW |
| UNITED KINGDOM |

CEPOL — European Police College

CEPOL House

Bramshill, Hook

Hampshire

RG27 0JW

UNITED KINGDOM

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

KIM BERRYMAN-DAGES,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00177-MP-GRJ

CITY OF GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA,

Defendant.

____________________________ /

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion For Order Enlarging Time For

Service of Response To Defendant’s Motion To Strike To And Including December 11,

2011. (Doc. 90.) Plaintiff requests an extension of time until December 11, 2011 to

respond to Defendant City of Gainesville’s Motion And Memorandum To Strike

Plaintiff’s Amended Initial Disclosures And Exclude Evidence For Failure to Comply

With Discovery Obligations. (Doc. 89.) Plaintiff represents that Defendant consents to

the requested extension. 

Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

 Plaintiff’s Motion For Order Enlarging Time For Service of Response To

Defendant’s Motion To Strike To And Including December 11, 2011 (Doc. 90) is

GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendant City of Gainesville’s Motion

And Memorandum To Strike Plaintiff’s Amended Initial Disclosures And Exclude

Evidence For Failure to Comply With Discovery Obligations (Doc. 89) on or before

December 12, 2011.

1

DONE AND ORDERED this 2 day of December 2011. 

nd

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Because December 11, 2011 is a Sunday, the response is due the next business day.

1

Case 1:10-cv-00177-MP-GRJ Document 91 Filed 12/02/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2010238EN.01000501.xml

| 3.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 September 2010

2010/C 238/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2818 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 107,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4447 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83275 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3185 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2953 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9010 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,710 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 285,03 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7087 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9767 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2698 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9402 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4099 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3451 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9619 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7898 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7262 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 513,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3090 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7270 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2815 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 545,73 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0060 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,558 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,3880 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,947 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2340 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7530 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,8920 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2818

JPY

Japanese yen

107,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4447

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83275

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3185

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2953

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9010

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,710

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

285,03

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7087

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9767

RON

Romanian leu

4,2698

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9402

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4099

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3451

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9619

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7898

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7262

KRW

South Korean won

1 513,56

ZAR

South African rand

9,3090

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7270

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2815

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 545,73

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0060

PHP

Philippine peso

57,558

RUB

Russian rouble

39,3880

THB

Thai baht

39,947

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2340

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7530

INR

Indian rupee

59,8920

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131571 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131571 COA: 268847 Wayne CC: 04-009112-01 TERRELL JUAN JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to ap peal the May 12, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0918 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 26, 2006

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 221 (Friday, November 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 64662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5687]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. CGD09-07-126]


Great Lakes Regional Waterways Management Forum

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: ``The Great Lakes Regional Waterways Management Forum'' will 
hold a meeting to discuss various waterways management issues. 
Potential agenda items will include navigation, ballast water 
regulations, waterways management, Great Lakes water levels, and 
discussions about the agenda for the next meeting. The meeting will be 
open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 10, 2007 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. 
Comments must be submitted on or before December 6, 2007 to be 
considered at the meeting.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Village Inn, 751 Christina 
Street, Point Edward, Ontario. Any written comments and materials 
should be submitted to Commander (dpw-2), Ninth Coast Guard District, 
1240 E. 9th Street, Room 2069, Cleveland, OH 44199.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Sharp (dpw-2), Ninth Coast Guard 
District, OH 44199, telephone (216) 902-6070. Persons with disabilities 
requiring assistance to attend this meeting should contact Doug Sharp.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Great Lakes Waterways Management Forum 
identifies and resolves waterways management issues that involve the 
Great Lakes region. The forum meets twice a year to assess the Great 
Lakes region, assign priorities to areas of concern, and identify 
issues for resolution.
    The forum membership has identified potential agenda items for this 
meeting that include: navigation, ballast water regulations, waterways 
management, Great Lakes water levels, and discussions about the agenda 
for the next meeting. The Forum will also provide updates from the 
Canadian Coast Guard, Transport Canada, U.S. Coast Guard, and the U.S. 
Army Corps of Engineers on regional projects and operations.

    Dated: November 6, 2007.
John E. Crowley, Jr.,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Ninth Coast Guard District, 
Cleveland, Ohio.
[FR Doc. 07-5687 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 220 (Thursday, November 15, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5683]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

39 CFR Part 301, 3010, 3015 and 3020

[Docket No. RM2007-1; Order No. 43]


Administrative Practice and Procedure, Postal Service; Correction

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Regulatory Commission published a final rule in the 
Federal Register of November 9, 2007 implementing certain provisions in 
the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act. The effective date 
should have read December 10, 2007, rather than November 9, 2007.

DATES: The effective date for FR Doc. E7-21596, published on November 
9, 2007 (72 FR 63662) is corrected to December 10, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 
202-789-6820 and <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9eedeafbeef6fbf0b0edf6ffecf8f3fff0deeeecfdb0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="017275647169646f2f72696073676c606f417173622f666e77">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of November 9, 2007, 
page 72 FR 63662, in the first column in the ``Dates'' entry, correct 
the reference ``Effective date: November 9, 2007'' to read ``Effective 
date: December 10, 2007.''

Steven W. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-5683 Filed 11-9-07; 12:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

GEORGE LYONS,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-298/RS/CJK

JACKSON CORRECTION INST., et al., 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) and 

Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. 9). I have considered the objections de novo. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order. 

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice as malicious pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for Plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial process. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

ORDERED on July 27, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00298-RS-CJK Document 11 Filed 07/27/11 Page 1 of 1