alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) (the “Report”) of Oilsands Quest Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended April 30, 2010, the undersigned Garth Wong, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:
   (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  July 21, 2010/s/ Garth WongGarth Wong, Chief Financial Officer
  
   EX-5
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHIRLEY M. HARVEY a/k/a SHIRLEY HARVEY, et al,

Appellant,

v.

SAXON MORTGAGE, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-606

[October 11, 2018]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Joel T. Lazarus, Senior Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 08-023453 CACE (11).

Shirley M. Harvey, Tampa, pro se.

Nancy M. Wallace of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; William P. Heller of 

Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderdale; and Celia C. Falzone of Akerman LLP, 

Jacksonville, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62634]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5522]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Performance Review Board Membership

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The notice of the names of members of a Performance Review 
Board for the Department of the Army published in the Federal Register 
on October 25, 2007 (72 FR 60662) has added two additional members.

DATES: Effective Date: September 30, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lucrencia Murdock, Civilian Senior 
Leader Management Office, 140 Army Pentagon, Washington, DC 20310-0140.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c)(1) through (5) of Title 5, 
U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with 
regulations, one or more Senior Executive Service performance review 
boards. The boards shall review and evaluate the initial appraisal of 
senior executives' performance by supervisors and make recommendations 
to the appointing authority or rating official relative to the 
performance of these executives.
    The members of the Department of the Army Performance Review Boards 
are:
    1. Dr. Grace M. Bochenek, Director, U.S. Army Tank automotive 
Research, Development and Engineering Center, U.S. Army Material 
Command.
    2. Mr. George S. Dunlop, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of 
the Army (Civil Works)/Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army 
(Legislation).

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-5522 Filed 11-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
# C_2010343EN.01000102.xml

| 17.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5970 — CA Immo/Europolis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 343/02

On 10 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5970. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5970. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

GAINESVILLE DIVISION 

SHARON DAVIS, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 1:10-cv-00169-SPM-GRJ 

NORTHSTAR LOCATION SERVICES, LLC, 

 Defendant. 

_____________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

 NOW COMES the Plaintiff, SHARON DAVIS, by and through the undersigned counsel 

and hereby informs the court that a settlement of the present matter has been reached and is in 

the process of finalizing settlement, which Plaintiff anticipates will be finalized within the next 

30 days. 

 Plaintiff therefore requests that this honorable court vacate all dates currently set on 

calendar for the present matter. 

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

 By: /s/ Nicholas J. Bontrager 

 [ ] Nicholas J. Bontrager 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 Krohn & Moss, Ltd. 

 10474 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 401 

 Los Angeles, CA 90025 

 Phone: (323) 988-2400 x 229 

 Fax: (323) 802-0021 

 nbontrager@consumerlawcenter.com 

Case 1:10-cv-00169-SPM-GRJ Document 6 Filed 11/02/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:10-cv-00169-SPM-GRJ Document 6 Filed 11/02/10 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION 

BRICE BUILDING CO., INC., 

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 5-10-mc-4/RS-EMT 

WILLIAM DEL LEE, an individual, 

and TALMEDGE E. LEE, an individual, 

Defendants, 

and 

VISION BANK

Garnishee. 

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Plaintiff’s Motion for Writ of Garnishment and Appointment of 

Special Process Server (Doc. 2). 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Motion is GRANTED. 

2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 64 and 69, and Fla. Stat. § 77.01, et seq., the Clerk of 

the Court is directed to issue the Writ of Garnishment directed to the Garnishee, 

VISION BANK. 
3. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.1(a), Mr. Charles Lance, an agent of L. Lance &

Associates, LLC, is appointed as the special process server who shall serve the 

Writ of Garnishment. 

ORDERED on December 16, 2010

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MICHAEL STEINBERG, MIRIAM STEINBERG,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00236-MP-GRJ

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 32, telephone status conference held on July 20,

2011, in which both parties participated. During the status conference, the parties announced a

pending settlement. As such, the Court will stay this case for thirty days to allow the parties to

finalize settlement. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Clerk is directed to return this file to the Court’s attention on August 19,

2011, if settlement has not yet been effected.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of July, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00236-MP-GRJ Document 33 Filed 07/20/11 Page 1 of 1
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| Dated:                   November 14, 2008 | By:    | /s/                James A. Banister                 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |   | James                A. Banister,                    |
|                                                      |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                                      |   | (Principal                Executive Officer)         |
|                                                      |   |                                                 |
| Dated:                   November 14, 2008 | By:    | /s/                Kelly A. McCrystal                |
|                                                      |   | Kelly                A. McCrystal,                   |
|                                                      |   | Chief                Operating Officer               |
|                                                      |   | (Principal                Financial Officer and      |
|                                                      |   | Principal                Accounting Officer)         |

----
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. David REEVES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 555, Docket 29613.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 1965.

Decided June 28, 1965.

David Reeves, pro se.

Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty. for Southern District of New York, New York City (Daniel Donnelly, and John E. Sprizzo, Asst. U. S. Attys., of counsel), for appellee.

Before KAUFMAN, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of violation of narcotics laws, 21 U.S.C. §§ 173 and 174 (1958) and 26 U.S.C. §§ 4705(a) and 7237(b) (1964).

 Appellant claims that his constitutional rights were violated by the use of certain of his own statements purportedly made in the absence of counsel and without advice as to his constitutional rights. The statements to which he refers were, first, a statement to the effect that he might at some indefinite time have handled some cocaine “just once” and, second, that he remembered an unspecified “something” about heroin. There is a question as to whether these statements can properly be classified as admissions since they do not appear to be incriminating. But even if they were improperly admitted we do not consider the error sufficient to justify a reversal, especially since the case was tried by a judge sitting without a jury.

> “[I]n reviewing proceedings before a judge alone, appellate courts may presume that improper evidence and comments have been rejected, at least absent a showing of substantial prejudice.” In re Bonanno, 2d Cir., 344 F.2d 830, April 30, 1965.

> “It is presumed that in reaching a decision the trial judge has rejected improper evidence. This rule is particularly applicable where the evidence of guilt is strong and convincing, as in the case here.” Teate v. United States, 297 F.2d 120, 122 (5th Cir. 1961).

Appellant’s other specifications of error are equally without merit.

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

TRUST FINANCIAL, A MORTGAGE

COMPANY, LLC, a Texas Limited

Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cv49-SPM/AK

FORT ATKINSON PLANTATION, LLC.,

a Florida Limited Liability Company, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

This cause comes before the Court on the Agreed Motion of Defendants

Campbell and Sherwood for an Enlargement of Time to Serve a Response to

Plaintiff’s Complaint. Doc. 18. The motion appears to be a duplicate of a

previously filed motion. Doc. 16. Nevertheless, the motion (doc. 18) is granted. 

Defendants Campbell and Sherwood shall have up to and including June 11,

2010, to file and serve their response to the complaint.

SO ORDERED this 9th day of June, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:10cv454 RS/CJK

MARK DANIEL LEITNER and

FLORIDAUCC, INC., a Florida

corporation

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Pursuant to and at the direction of the Court, Default Judgment is entered 

against Defendant MARK DANIEL LEITNER and in favor of Plaintiff UNITED 

STATES OF AMERICA.

 JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

 CLERK OF COURT

 June 24, 2011 s/Susan Anderson 

DATE Deputy Clerk: Susan Anderson

Case 3:10-cv-00454-RS-CJK Document 78 Filed 06/24/11 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.2



Manheim



6205 Peachtree Dunwoody Road

Atlanta, GA 30328

www.manheim.com



March 1, 2005



Ariel Amir

Executive Vice President and General Counsel

Autobytel Inc.

18872 MacArthur Boulevard

Irvine, CA
92612-1400



Dear Mr. Amir:



This letter will serve as permission to use our statistics, with proper
identification, in your Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.



As reflected in the attached, the size of the U.S. automotive market (new and used) in 2003 and 2004 was $738 billion and $759 billion, respectively.



The attached is Manheims 2005 Used Car
Market Report.



Sincerely,



| |  |                           
| |  | --------------------------
| |  | /s/ George Largay         
| |  | George Largay             
| |  | Director of Communications
| |  | 678-645-2127              
| |  | 678-645-3001 Fax
NO. 07-06-0266-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 16, 2007

______________________________

MICHAEL DAVID MCLAUGHLIN, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 17,191-B; HONORABLE JOHN BOARD, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant appeals his conviction for the offense of evading detention by use of a

motor vehicle, a felony, and subsequent sentence of two years incarceration in a State Jail

Facility. We affirm.

Appellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw. Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967). In support of his motion

to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in his opinion,

the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated. Id. at 744-
2

45. In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel

has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the trial

court’s judgment. Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy

of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right

to file a pro se response in this matter. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510

(Tex.Crim.App. 1991). The court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se

response. Appellant has not filed a response.

By his Anders brief, counsel raises grounds that could possibly support an appeal,

but concludes the appeal is frivolous. We have reviewed these grounds and made an

independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any arguable

grounds which might support an appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346,

102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We

have found no such arguable grounds and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court’s

judgment is affirmed.

Mackey K. Hancock

 Justice

Do not publish.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5619]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel Special Emphasis Panel Review--
Shultz P01.
    Date: December 7, 2007.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
5B01, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call.)
    Contact Person: Anne Krey, Scientific review Administrator, 
Division of Scientific review, National Institute of Child Health, 
and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 
20892, 301-435-6908.

(Catalogue of federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 2, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5619 Filed 11-09-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20278 Conference Calendar

ROLAND H. RUDD, also known as Elisha Aziz Muhammed, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus AMY H. SCUDDER; SAMUEL ROGERS; T. CASCIATO; T. DRAPER; WAYNE SCOTT, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CV-169

- - - - - - - - - - October 20, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellant Roland H. Rudd, TDCJ-ID # #283539, appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of the defendants in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He challenges several rulings made by the district court during his jury trial. An appellant, even one pro se , who wishes to challenge findings or conclusions that are based on proceedings at aNo. 97-20278 -2- trial has the responsibility to order a transcript. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); Powell v. Estelle , 959 F.2d 22, 26 (5th Cir. 1992). This court does not consider the merits of an issue when an appellant fails in that responsibility. Powell , 959 F.2d at 26. Rudd has not provided a trial transcript. All issues raised on appeal require examination of the transcript. We must therefore decline to consider all issues Rudd raises. See Alizadeh v. Safeway Stores, Inc. , 910 F.2d 234, 237 (5th Cir. 1990). Because there is no issue before us of arguable merit, the appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Therefore, the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
# C_2010029EN.01000401.xml

| 5.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5644 — Kraft Foods/Cadbury)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 29/03

On 6 January 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5644. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5644. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Powerwave Technologies, Inc.; and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        |   |           |   |   |   |                         |
|-------------|--------|----------------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|  Date: |   | April 29, 2011 |   | By:    |   | /s/ KEVIN T. MICHAELS        |
|        |   |           |   |   |   | Kevin T. Michaels            |
|        |   |           |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer      |
|        |   |           |   |   |   | Powerwave Technologies, Inc. |