alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

GERARD M. VIRGA, JR. and his wife,

DENISE VIRGA,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv242/RS-EMT

CSPS METAL, INC., a California

corporation; WAL-MART STORES,

INC. d/b/a SAM’S CLUB; SAM’S EAST,

INC.; and SAM’S CLUB,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiffs’ Second Motion For Extension Of Time (Doc. 50) which

does not comply with the requirements of N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(B). Plaintiffs are

admonished that they must comply with the requirement of N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(B) in

the future.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs shall make Rule 26(a)(2) expert witness disclosures not later

than February 14, 2011.

2. Defendants shall make Rule 26(a)(2) expert disclosures not later than

March 18, 2011.

3. All discovery shall be completed not later than April 1, 2011. 

4. Plaintiff must make their expert witnesses available for depositions upon
oral examination not later than the discovery deadline.

5. No further extensions of the discovery deadline shall be granted absent

extraordinary and unforeseeable circumstances.

ORDERED on February 4, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 10.41

 

AMENDMENT TO DEBENTURE

 

This Amendment to Debenture (this “Amendment”), dated as of January 17, 2014, is made by and between U.S. Dry Cleaning Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Setal 9 Trust (“Setal 9”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Debenture (as defined below).

 

W I T N E S SE T H

 

WHEREAS, Setal 9 purchased that certain 10% Senior Secured Original Issue Discount Convertible Debenture due March 31, 2015 on August 22, 2012 in the original principal amount of $550,000 (the “Debenture”);

 

WHEREAS, Section 11(n) of the Debenture provides that the terms of all of the Debenture may be amended with the written consent of the Company and Setal 9; and

 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend certain terms of the Debenture as set forth herein.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

 

1.                                      Event of Default.  Section 9(a) of the Debenture is hereby amended by inserting the following additional Event of Default:

 

“(xii)                                             The Company receives payment from any claim made on the term life insurance policy for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.”

 

2.                                      Remainder of Debenture Unchanged.  Except as amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Debenture shall remain in effect and the parties hereto ratify and confirm the same.

 

3.                                      Execution in Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed an original, and such counterparts together shall constitute one instrument. Delivery by facsimile or other electronic means of an executed counterpart hereof shall have the same force and effect as delivery of an originally executed counterpart hereof.

 

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signature Page to Follow]

 

1











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, by their duly authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

 

	
 
    	
U.S. DRY CLEANING SERVICES CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/S/   ALEX BOND
    
	
 
    	
Alex   Bond, Chief Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
SETAL   9 Trust
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
/S/   LESTER E. TAYLOR, JR.
    
	
 
    	
Lester   E. Taylor, Jr., Trustee
    


 

2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 11, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 70477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6022]



[[Page 70475]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part VI





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Executive Order 13453--Closing of Executive Departments and Agencies of 
the Federal Government on Monday, December 24, 2007


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 11, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 70477]]

                Executive Order 13453 of December 6, 2007

                
Closing of Executive Departments and Agencies of 
                the
                �MDBU�*ERR01*�MDNM�
Federal Government on Monday, 
                December 24, 2007

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

                Section 1. All executive branch departments and 
                agencies of the Federal Government shall be closed and 
                their employees excused from duty on Monday, December 
                24, 2007, the day before Christmas Day, except as 
                provided in section 2 below.

                Sec. 2. The heads of executive branch departments and 
                agencies may determine that certain offices and 
                installations of their organizations, or parts thereof, 
                must remain open and that certain employees must report 
                for duty on December 24, 2007, for reasons of national 
                security or defense or other public need.

                Sec. 3. Monday, December 24, 2007, shall be considered 
                as falling within the scope of Executive Order 11582 of 
                February 11, 1971, and of 5 U.S.C. 5546 and 6103(b) and 
                other similar statutes insofar as they relate to the 
                pay and leave of employees of the United States.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    December 6, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-6022
Filed 12-7-07; 11:52 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RALPH WARREN GOLDEN, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00113-MP-GRJ

SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPT.

OF CORRECTIONS, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated July 25, 2013. (Doc. 54). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any

timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc. 1)

is DENIED.
Page 2 of 2

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules

Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2013

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00113-MP-GRJ
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

J. P. OWENS, JR,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv183/RS-AK

WALTER A. MCNEIL,

Respondent.

__________________________________/

O R D E R

Before me is Petitioner’s Second Amended Petition For Writ Of Habeas Corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 8). Petitioner has previously been granted leave to proceed as a

pauper (Doc. 2). 

Respondent shall file an answer addressing the allegations in the petition. § 2254 Rule

5(b). "In addition, [the answer] must state whether any claim in the petition is barred by a failure

to exhaust state remedies, a procedural bar, non-retroactivity, or a statute of limitations." Id.

Respondent may respond to the merits without waiving the exhaustion requirement. See

§ 2254(b)(2) and § 2254(b)(3). Respondent shall include references to the record (included with

the answer pursuant to § 2254 Rule 5(d)) and citations to relevant legal authority. 

The response shall be styled as an answer unless a motion to dismiss the entire petition is

appropriate. If a motion to dismiss is filed, Respondent need not also file an answer unless

directed to do so. If an answer is filed raising a procedural defense to any ground for relief,

Respondent may await a ruling before responding on the merits to that particular ground. 

Petitioner may file a reply to any of Respondent's arguments within the time set by this
Page 2 of 2

Order, but is not required to do so. § 2254 Rule 5(e). I will review the record after the answer

and Petitioner’s reply (if any) are filed. If it does not appear that a hearing or additional

argument is warranted, then I will make appropriate disposition of the petition. If an evidentiary

hearing is warranted and permitted, counsel will be appointed. § 2254 Rule 8. 1

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The clerk shall serve a copy of the Second Amended Petition (Doc. 8), along with

this Order, to Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida via

certified mail, return receipt requested. 

2. Respondent shall file an answer or other pleading not later than November 23,

2010. If voluminous exhibits or records (such as transcripts) are submitted in

support of the answer, paper copies shall be provided to the court. 

3. Any reply filed by Petitioner shall be filed not later than December 23, 2010.

ORDERED on September 13, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Section 2254(e)(2) generally bars the court from granting an evidentiary hearing if the 1

Petitioner failed to properly develop the facts in support of his claim in state court. Schriro v.

Landrigan, 550 U.S. 465, 473-74 n.1 (2007). Even where not barred by the statute, the Court has

the discretion to deny a hearing if the record refutes the allegations or otherwise precludes relief. 

Id. (citations omitted). 

Case No: 5:10-cv-00183-RS -AK
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 231 (Monday, December 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 67884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5896]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE


Black Hills National Forest Advisory Board Public Meeting Dates 
Announced

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Black Hills National Forest Advisory Board (NFAB) has 
announced its meeting dates for 2008. These meetings are open to the 
public, and public comment is accepted at any time in writing and at 
the pleasure of the Board chair at each meeting for verbal comments. 
Persons wishing to speak may be given three minutes to address the 
Board.
    Meeting dates are the third Wednesday of each month unless 
otherwise indicated:

January 3.
February 20.
March 19.
April 16.
May 21.
June 18.
July (No Meeting).
August 20 (Summer Field Trip--TBA).
September 17.
October 15.
November 19.
December (No Meeting).
January 6, 2009 (Tentative).

ADDRESSES: Meetings will begin at 1 p.m. and end no later than 5 p.m. 
at the Forest Service Center, 8221 S. Highway 16, Rapid City, SD 57702.
    Agendas: The Board will consider a variety of issues related to 
national forest management. Agendas will be announced in advance in the 
news media but principally concern implementing phase two of the forest 
land and resource management plan. The Board will consider such topics 
as integrated vegetation management (wild and prescribed fire, fuels 
reduction, controlling insect epidemics, invasive species), travel 
management (off highway vehicles, the new OHV rule, and related 
topics), and forest fragmentation, among others.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frank Carroll, Committee Management 
Officer, Black Hills National Forest, 25041 North Highway 16, Custer, 
SD 57730, (605) 673-9200.

    Dated: December 1, 2007.
Craig Bobzien,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-5896 Filed 11-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We hereby consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-159563, 333-136109, 333-16905, 333-22749, 333-96393, 333-38626, 333-99749, 333-99751) of ForresterResearch, Inc. of our report dated March 9, 2012 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Boston,Massachusetts 

March 9, 2012
# C_2011010EN.01000101.xml

| 14.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5991 — Triton Iii Holding 6/Wittur Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 10/01

On 2 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5991. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5991. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

KIMBERLY ANNETTE KLINE-PARRIS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00111-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 23, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, which recommends that the Commissioner’s decision denying benefits to

plaintiff be reversed and remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand

the administrative law judge should analyze the medical evidence and medical opinions as

described in the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation – and as required by applicable

law, regulations and rulings – and to properly analyze the mental and physical demands of

plaintiff’s past relevant work as a bill collector and then determine whether plaintiff can perform

the mental and physical demands of that job in light of the ALJ’s evaluation of plaintiff’s RFC.

Absent a court order stating otherwise, a successful plaintiff’s counsel has fourteen days

after final judgment to file a motion with the District Court requesting an award of attorney fees. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2)(B). This Rule has been interpreted by the Eleventh Circuit to even

apply to a request for fees to be paid from plaintiff’s past due benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

406(b)(1). See Bergen v. Commissioner, 454 F.3d 1273, 1277-78 (11th Cir. 2006). However,

plaintiff's counsel in such a case will not know the amount of benefits - and therefore fees - until

Case 1:10-cv-00111-MP-GRJ Document 24 Filed 09/19/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

after the Commissioner awards benefits, which typically takes longer than fourteen days after the

entry of judgment. Therefore, an extension of time to seek such fees is warranted, as was

recommended by the Bergen opinion. See id. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 23, is

ACCEPTED, and incorporated herein.

2. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment reversing the decision to deny benefits

and remanding the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent

with this order.

3. Pursuant to Bergen, proceedings on attorney fees under the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. § 406(b) are stayed until the matter is fully adjudicated upon remand. 

The Plaintiff shall file a motion to award fees under § 406(b) within 30 days after

counsel receives notice from the Defendant Commissioner as to Plaintiff’s past

due benefits.

4. This stay relates only to attorney fee proceedings under § 406(b) of the Social

Security Act, not to attorney fee proceedings under the Equal Access to Justice

Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, the latter of which may be adjudicated at this time.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of September, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00111-MP-GRJ

Case 1:10-cv-00111-MP-GRJ Document 24 Filed 09/19/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009241EN.01000801.xml

| 8.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 October 2009

2009/C 241/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4694 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4436 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,92490 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3610 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5150 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3640 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,680 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7089 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2180 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2685 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1625 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6512 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5546 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3879 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0025 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0582 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 719,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,9850 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0306 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2855 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 853,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0217 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,474 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,7065 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,041 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5925 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,8597 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,6060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4694

JPY

Japanese yen

130,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4436

GBP

Pound sterling

0,92490

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3610

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5150

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3640

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,680

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7089

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2180

RON

Romanian leu

4,2685

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1625

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6512

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5546

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3879

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0025

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0582

KRW

South Korean won

1 719,70

ZAR

South African rand

10,9850

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0306

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2855

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 853,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0217

PHP

Philippine peso

68,474

RUB

Russian rouble

43,7065

THB

Thai baht

49,041

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5925

MXN

Mexican peso

19,8597

INR

Indian rupee

68,6060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 60008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Notification of an ``Open Meeting'' of the National Defense 
University Visitors (BOV)

AGENCY: Department of Defense; National Defense University.

ACTION: Notice of ``Open Meeting.''

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Defense University (NDU), Designated Federal 
Officer, has scheduled a meeting of the Board of Visitors. Request 
subject notice be published in the Federal Register. The National 
Defense University Board of Visitors is a Federal Advisory Board. The 
Board meets twice a year in proceedings that are open to the public.

DATES: The meeting will be held on November 19-20, 2007 from 11:00 to 
17:00 on the 19th and continuing on the 20th from 8:30 to 13:30.
    Location: The Board of Visitors meeting will be held at Building 
62, Marshall Hall, Room 155, National Defense University, 300 5th 
Avenue, Fort McNair, Washington, DC 20319-5066.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The point of contact for this notice 
of an ``Open Meeting'' is Jeanette Tolbert at (202) 685-3955, Fax (202) 
685-3328 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#481c27242a2d3a3c0208262c3d662d2c3d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="30645f5c525542447a705e54451e555445">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: State of the University, National Security 
Professional Development, Accreditation, and Federal Policy. The 
meeting is open to the public; limited space is made available for 
observers and will be allocated on a first-come, first-serve basis.

    Dated: October 17, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, DoD.
[FR Doc. 07-5217 Filed 10-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

AMANDA MOSS and DEKATER

THORPE,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv208/RS-EMT

GIFF SIZEMORE, et al,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10). 

Plaintiffs have not filed objections.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice because of Plaintiffs’ failure to

comply with an Order of this Court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on November 4, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE