alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010299EN.01000301.xml

| 5.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 November 2010

2010/C 299/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4244 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4547 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87585 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2550 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3782 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1480 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,408 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,40 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7097 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8958 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2848 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9830 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4056 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4269 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0404 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7889 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8280 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 571,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6600 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,4915 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3445 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 661,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3916 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,217 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,4300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,298 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3960 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4046 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,9370 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4244

JPY

Japanese yen

115,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4547

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87585

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2550

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3782

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1480

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,408

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,40

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7097

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8958

RON

Romanian leu

4,2848

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9830

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4056

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4269

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0404

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7889

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8280

KRW

South Korean won

1 571,18

ZAR

South African rand

9,6600

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,4915

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3445

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 661,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3916

PHP

Philippine peso

60,217

RUB

Russian rouble

43,4300

THB

Thai baht

42,298

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3960

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4046

INR

Indian rupee

62,9370

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 10.1

 

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

 

Dated: 5 September 2014

 

Parties:

 

1                           NZX Limited (“NZX”)

 

2                           Diligent Board Member Services, Incorporated (“DIL”)

 

BACKGROUND

 

A.                      On 14 August 2014, NZX served a Statement of Case on DIL alleging breaches of NZX Main Board Listing Rules (“Rule”) 10.3.1(b), 10.4.1 and 10.4.2.

 

B.                      The parties now wish to settle the matter on the terms set out in this Settlement Agreement.

 

C.                      DIL accepts that it has breached Rules 10.3.1(b), 10.4.1 and 10.4.2 as set out in the Statement of Case dated 14 August 2014.

 

D.                      DIL accepts the penalties as set out below.

 

E.                       This Settlement Agreement is conditional on the NZ Markets Disciplinary Tribunal (“Tribunal”) approving the terms of settlement.

 

AGREEMENT

 

1.                        It is a condition precedent to this agreement that it is approved by the Tribunal in accordance with Rule 10 of the NZ Markets Disciplinary Tribunal Rules.

 

2.                        DIL admits it breached Rules 10.3.1(b), 10.4.1 and 10.4.2 as described in the Statement of Case dated 14 August 2014.

 

3.                        A public censure of DIL will be made by the Tribunal in the form set out in Appendix 1.

 

4.                        DIL will pay the NZX Discipline Fund $100,000 (including GST, if any) in respect of the breaches of Rules 10.3.1(b), 10.4.1 and 10.4.2.

 

5.                        DIL will pay the costs of the Tribunal (plus GST, if any).

 

6.                        DIL will contribute to the costs of NZXR up to $3,840 (plus GST, if any).

 

7.                        NZX will send DIL a tax invoice for all amounts owing under paragraphs 4 to 6 above within 30 days of the terms of this settlement being approved by the Tribunal.

 












 

8.                                      The performance of these terms of agreement is in full and final settlement of the matters set out in and arising from NZX’s Statement of Case dated 14 August 2014.

 

 

EXECUTION

 

For and on behalf of NZX Limited

 

 

	
/s/   Hamish Macdonald
    	
 
    
	
Hamish   Macdonald
    	
 
    
	
Senior   Counsel
    	
 
    


 

 

For and on behalf of Diligent Board Member Services, Incorporated

 

 

	
/s/   Alessandro Sodi
    	
 
    
	
Authorised   Signatory
    	
 
    


 

 

APROVAL

 

This Settlement Agreement is hereby approved in accordance with Rule 10 of the NZ Markets Disciplinary Tribunal Rules

 

 

	
/s/   Donald Leslie Holborow
    	
 
    
	
Authorised   Signatory
    	
 
    
	
For   and on behalf of the
    	
 
    
	
NZ Markets Disciplinary Tribunal
    	
 
    
	
Donald   Leslie Holborow
    	
 
    
	
Division Chairman
    	
 
    


 

2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 65633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5763]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Eleventh Tenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 206/EUROCAE WG 76 
Plenary

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 206 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 206: Aeronautical Information 
Services Data Link.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 3-7, 2007 from 9 a.m. to 5 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at EUROCONTROL, Rue de la Fusee, 
96, B-1130 Brussels, Belgium.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036-5133; telephone (202) 833-9339; 
fax (202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org; (2) Hosted by LFV 
Group-Swedish Airports and Air Navigation Services; Onsite Contact: Ana 
Paula Frangolho telephone +32-2-729-4702; fax +32-2-9008.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 206 meeting/EUROCE WG 76. The 
agenda will include:
December 3
<bullet> Opening Plenary (Chairman's Remarks and Introductions, Review 
and Approve, Discussion, Meeting Agenda and Minutes, Action Item 
Review).
<bullet> Presentation TBD.
Begin effort on SPR and INTEROP.
December 4
<bullet> Subgroup 1 Subgroup 2 Meetings.
December 5
<bullet> Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2 Meetings.
December 6
<bullet> Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2 Meetings.
December 7
<bullet> Subgroup 1 and Subgroup 2 Meetings.
<bullet> Plenary Session.
<bullet> Closing Session (Other Business, Date and Place of Next 
Meeting, Closing Remarks, Adjourn).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 13, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-5763 Filed 11-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A2 for the period ended September 30, 2010 of Matches, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Neville PearsonNeville PearsonChief Executive Officer/s/ Neville PearsonNeville PearsonChief Financial OfficerDated: December 15, 2010   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Matches, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  FREIGHT  MANAGEMENT  CORP.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,  2008,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ibrahim
Abotaleb, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                  /s/ Ibrahim Abotaleb
                                  ----------------------------------------------
Date: July 21, 2008               Ibrahim Abotaleb
                                  President, CEO and Principal Executive Officer
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DIANA BRENNEN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00083-MP-AK

GROUP SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF SHANDS TEACHING

HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC, SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint by Diana

Brennen, Doc. 9. Following Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff has amended her

Complaint in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B). The Defendants do

not object to her doing so. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Motion to Amend is GRANTED. 

2. The amended complaint shall be accepted and filed by the clerk.

3. The Clerk is directed to terminate the Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 7. 

4. Plaintiff is directed to obtain a summons for each new Defendant and serve each

Defendant with process as mandated by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

5. Defendants shall respond to the Amended Complaint within the time limits set by

the Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of June, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

No. 1D18-5245 

_____________________________ 

MAURICE DEVELL ROBINSON, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. 

Michael C. Overstreet, Judge. 

July 9, 2019 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________ 
2 

Maurice Devell Robinson, pro se, Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof BPZ Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I Edward G. Caminos, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, tothe best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)                                TheReport fully complies with the requirements of sections 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/  EDWARD  G. CAMINOS |     |
|-----------------------------------|----------|
| Edward G. Caminos                 |     |
| *Chief  Financial Officer*        | * * |
| *(Principal  Financial Officer)*  | * * |
| March 31, 2010               |     |

 

----
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40384 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. FINAS HEARD, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-208-1
Before SMITH, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Finas Heard pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute, dispense, and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of cocaine base. In March of 2011, the district court sentenced him to 120 months of imprisonme n t , th e mandatory minimum in effect at the time of Hea r d ’ s o f f e nse conduct, and five years of supervised release. The district court rejected Heard’s argument that the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA) should apply retroactively to him. Heard appeals that decision. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 29 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-40384 Document: 00512035502 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/29/2012No. 11-40384

We held this matter in abeyance pending the outcome of Dorsey v. United States , 132 S. Ct. 2321 (2012). In light of Dorsey ’s holding that the FSA applies retroactively to those whose conduct occurred before the FSA’s effective date of August 3, 2010, but who were sentenced after that date, we VACATE H e ard’s sentence and REMAND this case for resentencing consistent with Dorsey

.

2 Case: 11-40384 Document: 00512035502 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/29/2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

TIMOTHY J. STEWART, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

FEDEX EXPRESS AND FEDERAL 

EXPRESS CORPORATION, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 186 WAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 17th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHRISTIAN RALPH DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv498/MCR/CJK

FRANK BELL, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 24, 2011(doc. 7). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been

1

filed. Having fully considered the record and the Report and Recommendation, the court

finds that it should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

The mail was returned as undeliverable on July 25, 2011. The Clerk mailed it again to the

1

Escambia County Jail and 608 N. C Street, Pensacola, Florida, and the plaintiff was provided an additional

14 days to file objections. The 608 N. C Street copy was returned as undeliverable but the second copy

mailed to the Escambia County Jail was not returned. Thus, the court assumes that the plaintiff received the

Report and Recommendation.

Case 3:10-cv-00498-MCR-CJK Document 11 Filed 08/23/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii) and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of August, 2011.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv498/MCR/CJK

Case 3:10-cv-00498-MCR-CJK Document 11 Filed 08/23/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Double Halo Resources Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
            The Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Dated:  March
13, 2009





By:       /s/
Susan Shacker


Susan
Shacker


President, Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal
Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-50903

Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Alejandro Zubieta-Moreno,

Defendant—Appellant,

consolidated with

No. 21-50916

 

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Alejandro Zuvieta-Moreno,

Defendant—Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 29, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-50903 Document: 00516258629 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2022
No. 21-50903

c/w No. 21-50916

Appeals from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:18-CR-738-1 

USDC No. 2:20-CR-1273-1

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges. 

Per Curiam:*

Alejandro Zuvieta-Moreno appeals his conviction and sentence for 

illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b), along with the 

revocation of the term of supervised release he was serving at the time ofthe 

offense. He has not briefed, and has therefore abandoned, any challenge to 

the revocation of supervised release or his revocation sentence. See United 

States v. Reagan, 596 F.3d 251, 254-55 (5th Cir. 2010).

For the first time on appeal, Zuvieta contends that § 1326(b) is 

unconstitutional because it allows for a sentence above the otherwise 

applicable statutory maximum based on facts that are neither alleged in the 

indictment nor found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He has filed an 

unopposed motion for summary disposition and a letter brief explaining that 

he raises this issue only to preserve it for further review and conceding 

correctly that it is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 

224 (1998). See United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). 

Because summary disposition is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. 

Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), Zuvieta’s motion is GRANTED, 

and the district court’s judgments are AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

2

Case: 21-50903 Document: 00516258629 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2022
# C_2011179EN.01000101.xml

| 18.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/1

---

2011/C 179/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 173, 11.6.2011

OJ C 173, 11.6.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 160, 28.5.2011

OJ C 152, 21.5.2011

OJ C 145, 14.5.2011

OJ C 139, 7.5.2011

OJ C 130, 30.4.2011

OJ C 120, 16.4.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

INVESTORSHUB.COM, INC., 

a Florida corporation, 

MATTHEW BROWN, 

an individual, and 

ROBERT ZUMBRUNNEN, 

an individual, 

 Plaintiffs, 

vs. Case No.: 4:11cv9-RH/WS

MINA MAR GROUP, INC., 

a foreign corporation, 

MINA MAR GROUP INC. (OF THE USA), 

n/k/a, EMRY CAPITAL GROUP, INC., 

a foreign corporation, and 

MIRO ZECEVIC, 

an individual, 

 Defendants. 

 / 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER

COME NOW the Defendants, by and through the undersigned counsel, who file this Motion 

for Leave to Amend Answer as follows: 

1. Pursuant to Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may amend a 

pleading by leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party. 

2. Pursuant to Rule 15, leave shall be freely granted when justice so requires. 

3. In this action, the proposed amendment would not add any new theories of defense or 

expand the scope of any discovery to be taken. 

4. Accordingly, the amendment would not prejudice the Plaintiffs. 

5. The undersigned counsel certifies that he has contacted counsel for the Plaintiffs, who 

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 10 Filed 04/07/11 Page 1 of 2
does not object to the granting of leave to amend the answer. 

WHEREFORE, the Defendants respectfully request leave to amend the Answer, as provided 

in the First Amended Complaint attached hereto. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 s\Thomas M. Findley . 

 Thomas M. Findley 

 Florida Bar No.: 0797855 

 tfindley@lawfla.com 

 Richard B. Akin, II 

 Florida Bar No.: 0068112 

 rakin@lawfla.com

MESSER, CAPARELLO & SELF, P.A. 

 P.O. Box 15579 

 Tallahassee, FL 32317 

 Telephone: (850) 222-0720 

 Facsimile: (850) 224-4359 

Attorneys for Defendants 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been delivered by 

Electronic Transmission to Deanna K. Shullman, Esq., Thomas & Locicero, PL, 8461 Lake Worth 

Rd., Suite 242, Lake Worth, FL 33467, dshullman@tlolawfirm.com and Paul R. McAdoo, Esq., 

Thomas & Locicero, PL, 400 North Ashley Dr., Suite 1100, Tampa, FL 33602, 

pmcadoo@tlolawfirm.com, on this 7th day of April, 2011. 

 

 s\Thomas M. Findley .

 Thomas M. Findley 

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 10 Filed 04/07/11 Page 2 of 2