alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.11

 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED

 

Amendment No. 1

 

to BACE Research Collaboration and License Agreement between Vitae Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, dated June 4, 2009 (the “Agreement”).

 

This Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement sets forth the mutual understanding concerning modifications of this Agreement.  Capitalized terms used in this 1st Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the same meanings herein as assigned to such terms in the Agreement.  For good and valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:

 

1.                                      Amendments

 

As of June 2, 2011, Exhibit 2, Preliminary Research Plan, fourth (4th) paragraph, of the Agreement, is hereby modified and replaced in its entirety as follows:

 

“Candidate feasibility for SoPD will be pursued with a compound demonstrating ****.  In addition, this compound should exhibit an acceptable profile as outlined in the tables below regarding ****.”

 

2.                                      Effect

 

This 1st Amendment shall be effective and binding upon the Parties as of the date set forth above in Section 1.  Except and only to the extent specifically modified herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.  In case of any conflict or inconsistency between the provisions of this 1st Amendment and the Agreement, this 1st Amendment shall control.

 

In witness hereof, the Parties, by their duly authorized officers, have executed this 1st Agreement.

 

	
Vitae   Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
    	
 
    	
Boehringer   Ingelheim
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
International   GmbH
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
ppa.
    	
 
    	
ppa.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/   Christine Brennan
    	
 
    	
/s/   Stephen Lensky
    	
 
    	
/s/   Dorothee Schwall-Rudolph
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Christine   Brennan, Ph.D.
    	
 
    	
*authorized   signatories*
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Date:   June 15, 2011
    	
 
    	
Date:   June 3, 2011
    	
 
    	
 
    


 




****CERTAIN INFORMATION HAS BEEN OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION.  CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT HAS BEEN REQUESTED WITH RESPECT TO THE OMITTED PORTIONS.
Heads of Agreement between:
 East Rand Proprietary Mines Ltd (“ERPM”)
 And
 Aurora Empowerment System (Pty) Ltd (“Aurora”)
 For the purchase of the ERPM Metallurgical Plant (the “Plant”):
 1
 Recordals
 a.  
  ERPM is the owner of the Plant, comprising the equipment situated on the site
 described on the inventory and site map, attached hereto and marked A1 and A2,
 and is able to dispose of it without any restriction of any kind;
 b.  
  Aurora is the owner of the Grootvlei and Marievale tailings dams as set out on the
 site map attached hereto marked B, and is able to dispose of it without any
 restriction of any kind;
 c.  
  ERPM and Aurora wish to enter into an agreement in terms of which Aurora
 acquires the Plant, and ERPM establishes an exclusive option in respect of the
 tailings.
 2
 Sale
 a.  
  ERPM  hereby  sells  to  Aurora  the  Plant for a consideration of R20,000,000.00
 (Twenty Million Rand) excluding VAT.
 b.  
  The purchase consideration will be paid as follows:
 i.  
  R5 million deposit upon signature of this agreement;
 ii.  
  The balance of the purchase consideration of R15 million by the 30
 th
 of June
 2010, unless ERPM elects to take up the Option, as described more fully,
 below; and





th
      th
     st
     th


Domicilium citandi et executandi
 domicilium citandi et executandi
       fazel@auroraempowerment.com


niel.pretorius@za.drdgold.com
  domicilium citandi et executandi
               contra proferentem





ERPM Reduction Plant Inventory
  
  
  
  
 2 x Lime tanks (100 Tons each )16 x Browns Tanks (600 cubic meters ) with 5 agitators, gearboxes and motors
 
  
   Conveyor belt and structure:
  Mill Building10 x ROM mills 16 x 8
 
 4 x Krebs cyclones operational1 set of liners for mill spare
 
 Smelt House3 x calciners
 
 1 x arc furnace2 x electrowinning cells
 
  
  
  
 CIP
 
  
  Workshop
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 Boilermaker Workshop
 
 1
 
  
  
 General


Security asset list — ERPM Plant
  
 2 x 20" colour HI resolution monitors3 x 14" colour, , screens
 
  
  
  
  
  
   
 1 x Phillips G3 colour auto dome 7.5 — 75mm zoom3 x Sony Super RL-3508C HADCCD 3 5mm — 8mm vari focal
   
 
 3 x Phillips GR day/nite auto domes 7.5 — 75mm zoom1 x High speed super dome — Sony CCD infra red camera
  Search cubicles — 2 x Sony Super RL-3508C HADCCD 35mm - 8mmEntrance/exit passageways — 2 x Sony Super RL-3508C HADCCD 6Control room — 1 x Sony Super RL-3508CSurveillance room — 1 x Sony Super RL-3508C
 Camera totalsDomes — 8
 
  
  
  
 2 x Handheld search devices


‐ 2 04
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5349 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5349

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1320 Autumn Avenue in Memphis, Tennessee, as the ``Judge Russell B. 
                    Sugarmon Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 20, 2018

Mr. Cohen (for himself, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, 
     Mr. Fleischmann, Mr. DesJarlais, Mr. Cooper, Mrs. Black, Mrs. 
Blackburn, and Mr. Kustoff of Tennessee) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1320 Autumn Avenue in Memphis, Tennessee, as the ``Judge Russell B. 
                    Sugarmon Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JUDGE RUSSELL B. SUGARMON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1320 Autumn Avenue in Memphis, Tennessee, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Judge Russell B. Sugarmon Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Judge 
Russell B. Sugarmon Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2015

t1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2015

152034

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 152034

COA: 327170 

Wayne CC: 14-004608-FH

JEREMY DAVID McLAUGHLIN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 9, 2015 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DANIEL BROWN,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-67-MP -GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPT.

OF CORRECTIONS,1

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has neither paid the $5.00 filing fee nor filed a

motion for leave to proceed as a pauper. Further consideration of the petition will be

deferred until payment is received or Petitioner is granted leave to proceed as a pauper.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1 That the Clerk shall forward to Petitioner an application for leave to proceed

as a pauper;

2. That Petitioner shall have until May 16, 2011, to either file an application for

leave to proceed as a pauper or to pay the $5.00 filing fee;

3. That failure to comply with this order as instructed, or to show cause as

to why Petitioner is unable to comply, may result in the dismissal of this

Because Petitioner is an inmate in the custody of the Florida Department of 1

Corrections (DOC), the Secretary of the DOC is the state officer who has custody of

Petitioner, and therefore is properly named as the Respondent in this case. See Fed.

R. Civ. P. 17(d); Rule 2, Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Petitions under § 2254. The

Clerk is directed to correct the docket accordingly.
Page 2 of 2

case for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of this court. 

2

DONE AND ORDERED this 14 day of April 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Petitioner should note that if he fails to respond to this Order and this case is 2

dismissed, any subsequently-filed habeas petition in this Court challenging the same

conviction may be barred by the one-year limitation period for filing a habeas petition in

the federal courts. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Although the one-year period is tolled

during the time in which a properly filed application for state post- conviction relief is

pending, see Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 8-9 (2000) (defining when an application is

"properly filed" under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2)), the time in which a federal habeas

petition is pending does not toll the one-year limitation period. See Duncan v. Walker,

533 U.S. 167 (2001) (holding that an application for federal habeas corpus review does

not toll the one-year limitation period under § 2244(d)(2)).

Case No: 1:111-cv-67-MP-GRJ
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 29 (Tuesday, February 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 6802]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-628]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental Conditions and Test 
Procedures for Airborne Equipment Joint With EUROCAE Working Group 14

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 135 meeting joint with EUROCAE 
Working Group 14.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental Conditions and 
Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment joint with EUROCAE Working Group 
14.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 13-15, 2007 starting at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Hotel Paradou, near Eurocopter 
Sausset-les-Pins, France.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Due to the particular organization of 
this meeting please make your booking and provide information on your 
stay to Marc Poncon as soon as possible at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6805091a0b461807060b0706280d1d1a070b07181c0d1a460b0705"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f69b978495d8869998959998b693838499959986829384d895999b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 135 meeting joint with EUROCAE 
Working Group 14. The agenda will include:
    <bullet> March 13-15.
     <bullet> Chairman's Opening Remark, Introductions.
     <bullet> Welcome from EUROCAE WG-14 Chairman.
    <bullet> Approval of Summary from the Forty-Eighth SC 135 Meeting 
and Sixtieth WG 14 Meeting.
     <bullet> RTCA Paper No. 023/SC135-659.
     <bullet> EUR 396-06/GT 14-127.
    <bullet> Review Change Proposals for First Draft of DO-160F/ED 
(draft section on RTCA Web site).
    <bullet> Review Schedule to Release DO-16-ED14 F.
    <bullet> Closing Plenary Session (New/Unfinished Business, Date and 
Place of Next Meeting).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 5, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-628 Filed 2-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RONNIE RAY DAW,

SARAH LOUISE DAW,

CANDIDA ROSE DAW,

Plaintiffs,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv96/RV/EMT

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN

AND FAMILIES, et al.

Defendants.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated October 24, 2011 (doc. 24). Plaintiffs’ have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Plaintiffs Ronnie Ray Daw and Sarah Louise Daw’s motion for voluntary dismissal 

(doc. 22) is GRANTED and the docket shall reflect that these Plaintiffs are no longer a party to this

action.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of November, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00096-RV-EMT Document 25 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2010185EN.01000501.xml

| 9.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5905 — Sacyr/Eiser/Aunor/Turia/Itemosa/Itepesa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 185/02

On 1 July 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5905. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5905. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011253EN.01000201.xml

| 30.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 August 2011

2011/C 253/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4487 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4508 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88460 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1157 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1824 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7740 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,123 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1562 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2384 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,5217 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3647 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4157 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2926 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7155 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7486 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 557,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,2295 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2442 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4740 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 382,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3193 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,516 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,7808 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,447 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3143 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,9929 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,7200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4487

JPY

Japanese yen

111,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4508

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88460

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1157

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1824

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7740

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,123

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1562

RON

Romanian leu

4,2384

TRY

Turkish lira

2,5217

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3647

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4157

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2926

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7155

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7486

KRW

South Korean won

1 557,42

ZAR

South African rand

10,2295

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2442

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4740

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 382,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3193

PHP

Philippine peso

61,516

RUB

Russian rouble

41,7808

THB

Thai baht

43,447

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3143

MXN

Mexican peso

17,9929

INR

Indian rupee

66,7200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Case 5:11-cv-00033-RS-CJK Document 58 Filed 12/22/11 Page 1 of 5
Case 5:11-cv-00033-RS-CJK Document 58 Filed 12/22/11 Page 2 of 5
Case 5:11-cv-00033-RS-CJK Document 58 Filed 12/22/11 Page 3 of 5
Case 5:11-cv-00033-RS-CJK Document 58 Filed 12/22/11 Page 4 of 5
Case 5:11-cv-00033-RS-CJK Document 58 Filed 12/22/11 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Aden Solutions Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Silvia Soltan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 10thday of November, 2009.



| | SILVIA SOLTAN                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Silvia Soltan,                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer















A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Aden Solutions Inc. and will be retained by Aden Solutions Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5194 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5194

 To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide protections against 
   pregnancy discrimination in the workplace, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2018

    Mr. Walberg (for himself, Mrs. Noem, Ms. Jenkins of Kansas, Ms. 
  Stefanik, and Mrs. Wagner) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide protections against 
   pregnancy discrimination in the workplace, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pregnancy Discrimination Amendment 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROTECTIONS AGAINST PREGNANCY DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE.

    Section 701(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e(k)) 
is amended in the first sentence, by striking ``as other persons not so 
affected but similar in their ability'' and inserting ``as any other 
applicants for employment with, or employees employed by, the same 
employer, in work that is performed under similar working conditions, 
who are not so affected but similar in their temporary ability''.
                                 <all>
```