alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KURTIS ROY JETER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:11cv18/RS/CJK

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

This prisoner civil rights case filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is before the Court

upon referral from the Clerk. On May 16, 2012, the Court entered an order requiring

plaintiff to file, within thirty days, a printout of the transactions in his inmate trust

account for the period December 31, 2011, to May 16, 2012. (Doc. 14). Plaintiff was

warned that failure to comply with the order would result in a recommendation that

this case be dismissed. To date, plaintiff has not complied with the order, and has not

responded to the Court’s June 26, 2012 order (doc. 15) requiring him to show cause,

within fourteen days, why this case should not be dismissed.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s

failure to comply with an order of the court.

Case 5:11-cv-00018-RS-CJK Document 16 Filed 07/24/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. That the Clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida this 24th day of July, 2012.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITEDSTATESMAGISTRATEJUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No: 5:11cv18/RSCJK

Case 5:11-cv-00018-RS-CJK Document 16 Filed 07/24/12 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 13th meeting of the American Health Information Community Quality Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

December 14, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern].

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​quality/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Workgroup will continue its discussion on how health information technology can provide the data needed for the development of quality measures that are useful to patients and others in the health care industry, automate the measurement and reporting of a comprehensive current and future set of quality measures, and accelerate the use of clinical decision support that can                           ( print page 64083)                        improve performance on those quality measures.                

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​quality_​instruct.html.*

Dated: November 2, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-5643  Filed 11-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

vs. 3:09cr84/MCR

CLAYTON ELLIS BARNES,

 Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11,

Fed.R.Crim.P., and has entered a plea of guilty to the one count indictment against

him. After cautioning and examining the defendant under oath concerning the

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable

and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis

in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guiltybe accepted and that the defendant be adjudicated

guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: September 24, 2009

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within 24 hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Matches, Inc.   (the "Company") on Form  10-Q for the  period  ending  June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Zhao Zhimeng, Chief Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   August 15, 2011 /s/ Zhao Zhimeng Zhao Zhimeng Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  Date
# C_2010082EN.01002401.xml

| 30.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/24

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5762 — InnoLux/Chi Mei/TPO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 82/03

On 25 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5762. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5762. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011122EN.01000501.xml

| 20.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6128 — Blackstone/Mivisa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 122/02

On 25 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6128. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6128. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6560

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHELLY WAYNE MARTIN, a/k/a Wayne,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:04-cr-00029-JFM-3; 1:16-cv-00109-JFM)

Submitted: September 13, 2016 Decided: September 15, 2016

Before TRAXLER, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shelly Wayne Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon, 

Robert Reeves Harding, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shelly Wayne Martin seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying Martin’s self-styled “Motion Under the 

Declaratory Judgment Act of 28 U.S.C. § 2201,” construing this 

motion as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and dismissing it for 

lack of jurisdiction because it was a successive § 2255 motion 

for which Martin had not received prefiling authorization, and 

denying Martin’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend 

judgment. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 
3

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Martin has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2010270EN.01000501.xml

| 6.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 October 2010

2010/C 270/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3780 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,80 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4549 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86670 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2626 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3348 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0410 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,498 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,73 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9708 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2780 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9889 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4338 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4070 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6886 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8515 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8083 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 557,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5759 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2205 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3048 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 310,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2670 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,270 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,6400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,533 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3340 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2951 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,5550 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3780

JPY

Japanese yen

114,80

DKK

Danish krone

7,4549

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86670

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2626

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3348

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0410

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,498

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,73

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9708

RON

Romanian leu

4,2780

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9889

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4338

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4070

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6886

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8515

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8083

KRW

South Korean won

1 557,45

ZAR

South African rand

9,5759

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2205

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3048

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 310,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2670

PHP

Philippine peso

60,270

RUB

Russian rouble

41,6400

THB

Thai baht

41,533

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3340

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2951

INR

Indian rupee

61,5550

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the “Trust”) does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that: 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2022 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
/s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. HooperSenior Vice President on behalf of Argent Trust Company, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust
Dated: February 14, 2023 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 
**
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-207-SPM -GRJ

DAVID MORGAN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Request For Extension of Time to

Answer. (Doc. 38.) Plaintiff requests that Defendant Sawgrass Tiki Bar, Inc.

(“Sawgrass”) be given a thirty day extension of time to respond to the Complaint.

Plaintiff advises that it is engaged in settlement discussions with Sawgrass and that if

Sawgrass was required to retain counsel and respond to the Complaint settlement

would be less likely. 

Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s Request For Extension of Time to Answer (Doc. 38) is GRANTED.

2. Defendant Sawgrass Tiki Bar, Inc. shall have until April 22, 2011 to retain

counsel and file its response to the Complaint.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5 day of April, 2011. th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  

									
	 NUMBER
  
	 		 	



	 		  	 SHARES
  

	  
 GREAT BASIN SCIENTIFIC, INC.

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

COMMON STOCK


  

					
	THIS CERTIFIES that	 		  	 CUSIP 39013L 106

SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN

DEFINITIONS


 is the owner of 

FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.001 PER SHARE OF 

GREAT BASIN SCIENTIFIC, INC. 

transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This
Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said
Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and its Corporate seal to be hereunto affixed. 

DATED: 
  

					
	  /s/ Ryan Ashton

Secretary
	 		  	  /s/ Ryan Ashton

President


 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED 

  AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC 

  TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
 BY

  
  

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out
in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

									
		 	TEN COM	 	-as tenants in common	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT-	  	            Custodian            
		 	TEN ENT	 	-as tenants by the entireties	 		  	(Cust)                  (Minor)
		 	JT TEN	 	-as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	 		  	under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act
					
		 		 		 		  	  

		 		 		 		  	(State)








 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For Value Received,
                                         
            do hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
  

					
	 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
	  		  	
			
	  
	  		  	

  
   

 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING
POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 
  
  

                         
                                         
                           Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint
                                         
                                        Attorney to
transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated:
                                         
        
  

					
		 	X	  	
		 		  	  

		 	X	  	
		 		  	  

		 	NOTICE:	  	THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

 Signature(s) Guaranteed 
  

					
	By:	 		 	
		 	  
	 	
		 	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 1 4 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk April 1 4 , 2017

15 5 263 ( 57 )

JOHN LAUVE

, Plaintiff

- Appell ant

, SC: 15 5 263

v COA: 3 2 9985

Ct of Claims : 1 5

- 00 0118

- MM

GOVERNOR

, Defendant

- Appell ee

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of plaintiff

- appell ant to extend the time

for filing his reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on April 3 , 2017 , is accepted for

filing

.
HEATHER HEITGER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-0909

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 10, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Michael A. Flowers, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, C.J., VAN NORTWICK and SWANSON, JJ., CONCUR.