alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010142EN.01002501.xml

| 1.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/25

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 May 2010

2010/C 142/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2307 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4395 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84863 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6230 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4230 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9390 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,505 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,53 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0791 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1855 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9360 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4576 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2894 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5905 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8120 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7225 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 479,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4552 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4031 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2635 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 276,14 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0139 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,918 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,0340 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,070 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2343 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,8822 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 57,0550 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2307

JPY

Japanese yen

112,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4395

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84863

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6230

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4230

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9390

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,505

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,53

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0791

RON

Romanian leu

4,1855

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9360

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4576

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2894

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5905

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8120

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7225

KRW

South Korean won

1 479,42

ZAR

South African rand

9,4552

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4031

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2635

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 276,14

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0139

PHP

Philippine peso

56,918

RUB

Russian rouble

38,0340

THB

Thai baht

40,070

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2343

MXN

Mexican peso

15,8822

INR

Indian rupee

57,0550

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 24 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.24

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and nineteen

                                 An Act

 
    To provide for the compensation of Federal and other government 
             employees affected by lapses in appropriations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Government Employee Fair Treatment 
Act of 2019''.
SEC. 2. COMPENSATION FOR FEDERAL AND OTHER GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES 
AFFECTED BY A LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS.
    Section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
        (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``An officer'' and 
    inserting ``Except as specified in this subchapter or any other 
    provision of law, an officer''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c)(1) In this subsection--
        ``(A) the term `covered lapse in appropriations' means any 
    lapse in appropriations that begins on or after December 22, 2018;
        ``(B) the term `District of Columbia public employer' means--
            ``(i) the District of Columbia Courts;
            ``(ii) the Public Defender Service for the District of 
        Columbia; or
            ``(iii) the District of Columbia government;
        ``(C) the term `employee' includes an officer; and
        ``(D) the term `excepted employee' means an excepted employee 
    or an employee performing emergency work, as such terms are defined 
    by the Office of Personnel Management or the appropriate District 
    of Columbia public employer, as applicable.
    ``(2) Each employee of the United States Government or of a 
District of Columbia public employer furloughed as a result of a 
covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for the period of the 
lapse in appropriations, and each excepted employee who is required to 
perform work during a covered lapse in appropriations shall be paid for 
such work, at the employee's standard rate of pay, at the earliest date 
possible after the lapse in appropriations ends, regardless of 
scheduled pay dates.
    ``(3) During a covered lapse in appropriations, each excepted 
employee who is required to perform work shall be entitled to use leave 
under chapter 63 of title 5, or any other applicable law governing the 
use of leave by the excepted employee, for which compensation shall be 
paid at the earliest date possible after the lapse in appropriations 
ends, regardless of scheduled pay dates.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00128-CR

SHANNON JERMAINE GARRETT,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from

Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1451192D)

February 6, 2020

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dana Womack

 Justice Dana Womack
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Richard McKilligan                                                  |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Richard      McKilligan                                                      |
| Chief      Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting    Officer) |
| August      16, 2010                                                         |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5316 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5316

 To authorize appropriations for the seniors farmers' market nutrition 
              program for fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2018

   Mr. Faso introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize appropriations for the seniors farmers' market nutrition 
              program for fiscal years 2019 through 2023.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENIORS FARMERS' MARKET NUTRITION PROGRAM.

    Section 4402(a) of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 
2002 (7 U.S.C. 3007(a)) is amended striking ``2018'' and inserting 
``2023''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000055373
<NAME> KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      691,260
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      6,434
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          60,903
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         6,903
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  89,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 855,308
<COMMON>                                        50,450
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      118,750
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             80,744
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 249,944
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           293,307
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              35,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  36,450
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     10,596
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                 3,167
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 226,844
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  855,308
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      256,472
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             9,573
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     211,393
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     220,966
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         35,506
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (351)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  35,155
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        18,431
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,724
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   16,724
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        20,070
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       10,528
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          35,689
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IVAN HARVEY,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:09cv402-WS

EFIONG O. ANDEM, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 94)

docketed May 19, 2011. The magistrate judge recommends (1) that the plaintiff's

motion for summary judgment be denied; (2) that the defendant's motion for summary

judgment be granted as to all claims except the plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation

claim against M. Nichols; (3) that the plaintiff's claims for compensatory and punitive

damages on his First Amendment retaliation claim against Nichols be DISMISSED

without prejudice; and (4) that the plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief be DISMISSED as

moot. Both the plaintiff and Nichols have filed objections (docs. 96 & 95 respectively) to

the report and recommendation.

Having considered the both record and the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation in light of the filed objections, the court finds that the report and

recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Case 3:09-cv-00402-WS-CJK Document 97 Filed 06/24/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 94) is ADOPTED

and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (doc. 81) is DENIED.

3. The defendants' motion for summary judgment (doc. 77) is DENIED as to the

plaintiff's First Amendment claim against the defendant, M. Nichols, and is GRANTED

as to all other claims and defendants. 

4. The plaintiff's requests for compensatory and punitive damages on his First

Amendment claim against M. Nichols are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

5. The plaintiff's request for injunctive relief is DISMISSED as moot.

6. The case shall be remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings

on the plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim against M. Nichols.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of June , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:09cv402-WS

Case 3:09-cv-00402-WS-CJK Document 97 Filed 06/24/11 Page 2 of 2
Order on Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(¢)(2) Page L of |

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Northern District of Florida

United States of America

v. Case No.: 1:01cr46-001/MMP.
USM No.:

Charles Brennen, Jr.

Date of Original Judgment: June 30, 2003

Date of Previous Amended Judgment:
(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

Order on Motion for Sentence Reduction

(The Defendant Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court has moved
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment previously imposed
based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive
by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u). Having considered
such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the
sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent they are applicable, the court
orders that the motion is:

M DENIED. 1 GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment.
. (as reflected in the last judgment issued) Of months is reduced to

(Complete Part I, II or IL of Attachment, as applicable)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signature of Judge

M. Casey Rodgers
Effective Date: Chief United States District Judge

(if different from order date) Printed Name and Title of Judge

Recdd 10°? 11UsDeFln310307

Gre
EXHIBIT 32

<PAGE>


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  TransBiotec,   Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 30, 2012 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  Scott Painter, the Principal
Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


August 14, 2012                       By:/s/ Scott Painter
                                         -------------------------------
                                         Scott Painter, Principal
                                         Executive and Financial Officer
<PAGE>
gthp_ex1038





 







Exhibit 10.38


 


 ADDENDUM TO EXCHANGE
AGREEMENT


An Agreement was made by and between GUIDED
THERAPEUTICS, [NC. (the "Company") and the undersigned creditor of
the Company (the "Creditor") on the 241h
day of July, 2018
(hereinafter referred to as "original
stated contract") set forth below.


WHEREAS,
the parties wish to modify the terms of the original stated
contract as set forth herein.


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein, the
parties. intending to be legally bound, hereby agree that the
following constitutes additional terms and conditions of the stated
contract.


Modification
Item I : The Creditor agrees to accept cash payment in the amount
of $319204.30 in the form of an unsecured note, with the Company,
bearing 6% annual interest and commencing on the day of the
original Agreement. The note shall due in full on the third
anniversary of that agreement.


The
parties reaffirm no other terms or conditions of the above
mentioned original contract not hereby otherwise modified or
amended shall be negated or changed as a result of this here stated
addendum.


Dated:
July 26, 2019



Company:



GUIDED THERAPEUTICS, INC.


/s/ Mark L.
Faupel, COO



Creditor:


By:
/s/ Gene S. Cartwright.


Gene
S. Cartwright, President
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ANTHONY J. FAILS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv401/WS/EMT

G.R. BYRD,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the instant civil rights case,

filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, without prejudice (Doc. 4).

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that an action may be dismissed without an order of the court

by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before the adverse party serves an answer or files a motion

for summary judgment. Because Defendant has not yet been served in the instant case, it is clear

that Plaintiff is automatically entitled to a voluntary dismissal at this time.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 4) be GRANTED and this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 28th day of October 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No.: 3:10cv401/WS/EMT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DOUGLAS McDANIEL,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11cv14/RS-CJK

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested by Plaintiff’s Motion For Order Enlarging Time For 

Response To Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. 29) is granted.

ORDERED on September 12, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00014-RS-GRJ Document 30 Filed 09/12/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

INDEPENDENT FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with this Quarterly Report of Independent Film Development Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeff Ritchie, the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 20, 2010



/s/  Jeff Ritchie

Jeff Ritchie

Chief Executive Officer and Director
# C_2010205EN.01000801.xml

| 29.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 July 2010

2010/C 205/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2992 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,01 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4520 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83395 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4795 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3760 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9810 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,985 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,24 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0070 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2545 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9646 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4518 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3391 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0901 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7801 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7740 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 538,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5517 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8060 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2447 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 694,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1464 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,526 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,2970 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,906 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2957 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4628 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,7510 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2992

JPY

Japanese yen

114,01

DKK

Danish krone

7,4520

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83395

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4795

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3760

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9810

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,985

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,24

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0070

RON

Romanian leu

4,2545

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9646

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4518

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3391

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0901

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7801

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7740

KRW

South Korean won

1 538,50

ZAR

South African rand

9,5517

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8060

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2447

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 694,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1464

PHP

Philippine peso

59,526

RUB

Russian rouble

39,2970

THB

Thai baht

41,906

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2957

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4628

INR

Indian rupee

60,7510

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---