alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cr-00001-MP-GRJ

SCOTT THOMAS LYONS, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 47, Motion to File Motion to Continue

Under Seal by Scott Thomas Lyons. The government does not oppose defendant’s

motion. Accordingly, the motion to continue, when filed, shall be filed under seal.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of December, 2011. 

áBZtÜç eA ]ÉÇxá 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cr-00001-MP-GRJ Document 48 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Manchester Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Elan Yaish, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 28, 2003                      /S/    ELAN YAISH
                                            ------------------
                                                   Elan Yaish
                                           Vice President-Finance and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DENISE NAILS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No: 3:09cv394/MCR/MD

PENSACOLA COVENANT HOSPICE, et al., 

Defendants.

ORDER and

AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On September 30, 2009, the undersigned issued an Order and Report and

Recommendation granting plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and

recommending that her amended complaint be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 10). This Amended Report and

Recommendation is submitted following plaintiff’s filing of a Motion to Dismiss 

(Doc. 13). 

Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that the plaintiff may

dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the

opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment. FED. R.

CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A). The dismissal is without prejudice, unless the notice states

otherwise. FED.R.CIV.P.41(a)(1)(B). Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss states that plaintiff

is dismissing this case with prejudice. (Doc. 13). Defendants have not been served;

therefore, no answer or motion for summary judgment has been filed. Pursuant to

FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1), this case should be dismissed with prejudice. 
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The original Report and Recommendation issued on September 30, 2009

(doc. 10) is VACATED, and this Amended Report and Recommendation replaces the

former in full.

2. The Order (doc. 10) granting plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis

(doc. 9) REMAINS IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.

And it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss (doc. 13) be GRANTED.

2. That this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and the clerk be directed

to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 27 day of October, 2009. th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within ten days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Case No: 3:09cv394/MCR/MD
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5215 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5215

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to prohibit employees found to have knowingly misused 
Department of Veterans Affairs purchase cards from serving as purchase 
                  card holders or approving officials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Affairs Purchase Card 
Misuse Mitigation Act''.

SEC. 2. MISUSE OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PURCHASE CARDS BY 
              DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 727. Misuse of Department purchase cards
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary shall prohibit any employee of the 
Department who the Secretary or the Inspector General of the Department 
determines has knowingly misused a purchase card from serving as a 
purchase card holder or approving official. Such a prohibition shall be 
in addition to any other applicable penalty.
    ``(b) Misuse.--For purposes of this section, the term `misuse' 
means--
            ``(1) splitting purchases;
            ``(2) exceeding applicable purchase card limits or purchase 
        thresholds;
            ``(3) purchasing any unauthorized item;
            ``(4) using a purchase card without being an authorized 
        purchase card holder; or
            ``(5) violating ethics standards.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
725 the following new item:

``727. Misuse of Department purchase cards.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5215

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to prohibit employees found to have knowingly misused 
Department of Veterans Affairs purchase cards from serving as purchase 
                  card holders or approving officials.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Ronald J. Buschur, Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |     |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: |  | April 30, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ RONALD J. BUSCHUR                
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Ronald J. Buschur                    
|      |  |                |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Special Emphasis Panel. To review T32s received under PAR-05-101 & PAR-07-332.                    

*Date:*                         February 25, 2008.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mary Kelly, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Dental and Crainofacial Res., 45 Center Drive, Natcher Bldg., RM 4AN38F, Bethesda, MD 20892-6402, (301) 594-4809,                         *mary_kelly@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 2, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5617 Filed 11-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JEROME E. TODD,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv304-SPM/CJK

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 5) dated February 10, 2011. 

Petitioner was given an opportunity to file objections. No objections have been

filed. I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 5) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice for Petitioner’s failure to 
Page 2 of 2

comply with an order of the Court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of March, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 5:10cv304-SPM/CJK
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Steve Swift, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of WellQuest Medical & Wellness Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
WellQuest Medical & Wellness Corporation.

|                               |                   | 
|------------------------------ | ----------------- | 
|By:                            | /s/ STEVE
  SWIFT | 
|                               |                   | 
|Date: August
  14, 2009        |                  
|Name: Steve
  Swift            |                  
|Title: Chief Executive Officer |                  

I,
Greg Primm, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of WellQuest Medical & Wellness Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
WellQuest Medical & Wellness Corporation.

|                                 |                  | 
|-------------------------------- | ---------------- | 
|By:                              | /s/ GREG
  PRIMM | 
|                                 |                  | 
|Date: August
  14, 2009          |                 
|Name: Greg
  Primm               |                 
|Title: Chief
  Financial Officer |                 
|                                 |                 

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5205 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5205

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, as the ``Sergeant Kenneth Eric 
                          Bostic Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT KENNETH ERIC BOSTIC POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 10.3


 





AMENDMENT


 


TO


 


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to Employment
Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made as of April 8, 2020, by and among GL Brands, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”) and Alex Frias (the “Employee”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and the Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of May 31, 2019, and amended November 18, 2019 (the
“Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the parties
desire to now amend certain of the terms of the Employee Agreement on the terms set forth herein; and


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the
Company and the Employee hereby agree as follows:


 


1.              
Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement.


 


2.              
Amendment. The Agreement is hereby amended to reduce the Base Salary from $150,000 to $130,000.


 


3.              
Agreement. Except as modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


4.              
Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the internal laws of the State
of Texas, without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of law.


 


5.              
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an
original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.


 


 


 


 


[Signature
page follows]


 


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the date first written above.


 





	 	 


THE COMPANY:


 


GL Brands, Inc.


 


By: /s/ Carlos Frias

       Name: Carlos Frias

       Title: CEO


 


THE EMPLOYEE:


 


Alex Frias


 


By: /s/ Alex Frias

       Individually






 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 





[Signature Page to Amendment to Employment
Agreement]


 






    	 	2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

AAHTRELL R JOHNSON, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00225-MP-GRJ

SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPT.

OF CORRECTIONS, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated October 18, 2013. (Doc. 17). The parties have been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, (doc.

1) is DENIED.
Page 2 of 2

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules

Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of December, 2013

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00225-MP-GRJ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SCOTT CARSWELL, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cv486-SPM/WCS

LISA ECHEVERRI, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME AND STAYING DEADLINES

Upon consideration of the parties’ unopposed motions concerning

extensions of time to respond to the complaint and staying the deadlines in the

initial scheduling order pending rulings on motions to stay and remand, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The motions for extension of time to respond (docs. 36 and 39) are

granted. Transocean shall have 5 days after a ruling on the motion to stay to

respond to the amended complaint. HHI shall 30 days after a ruling on the

motion to stay to respond to the amended complaint.

2. The motions to stay the initial scheduling order (docs. 40 and 42) 

are granted. The deadlines in the initial scheduling order are stayed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00486-SPM -WCS Document 51 Filed 01/05/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009243EN.01000701.xml

| 10.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/7

---

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2008

2009/C 243/05

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.eda.europa.eu/finance.aspx

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANDRES BAIN,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-00012-MP -WCS

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DAVID HARVEY, ERIC H HOLDER, JR,

JANET NAPOLITANO, MICHAEL ROZOS,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 13, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that this petition be denied as moot. The time for filing

objections has passed, and none have been filed. The Court agrees that because the Petitioner

has been released, this matter has become moot. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. This petition is denied and the Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of April, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 22, 2019

No. 04-19-00281-CV

Dianne SCHRAB,

Appellant

v.

Andrew ROSSI,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Jim Hogg County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC-17-154

Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The petition for permissive appeal is DENIED. This appeal is DISMISSED. Appellee is 

awarded costs he incurred related to this appeal. 

It is so ORDERED on May 22, 2019.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of May, 2019.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court