alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7154
TERRY ALONZA MILBOURNE, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN WELCH, Warden; CORPORAL KELLEM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-2205-WMN) Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 4, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Alonza Milbourne, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Terry Alonza Milbourne, Sr., appeals the district court’s orderdismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Milbourne v. Welch , No. CA-98- 2205-WMN (D. Md. July 16, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5406 

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, to require that 

the annual budget submissions of the Presidents include the total dollar 

amount requested for intelligence or intelligence related activities of each 

element of the Government engaged in such activities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2018 

Mr. WELCH (for himself and Mr. SENSENBRENNER) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend section 1105 of title 31, United States Code, 

to require that the annual budget submissions of the 

Presidents include the total dollar amount requested for 

intelligence or intelligence related activities of each element of the Government engaged in such activities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Intelligence Budget 

5 Transparency Act of 2018’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5406 IH

1 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES OF EACH 

2 ELEMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT. 

3 Section 1105(a) of title 31, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following new para5 graph: 

6 ‘‘(40)(A) the total dollar amount proposed in 

7 the budget for intelligence or intelligence related ac8 tivities of each element of the Government engaged 

9 in such activities in the fiscal year for which the 

10 budget is submitted and the estimated appropriation 

11 required for each of the ensuing four fiscal years; 

12 and 

13 ‘‘(B) as used in subparagraph (A), the term 

14 ‘element of the Government’ refers to each element 

15 of the intelligence community as defined in section 

16 3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 

17 U.S.C. 3003(4)).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PERRY GENE VANDERFORD,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv74/RV/EMT

R. TIFFT, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). By order of this court dated

March 1, 2011, Plaintiff was given thirty (30) days in which to pay the filing fee or file a complete

application to proceed in forma pauperis (see Doc. 5). Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or submit

a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis; therefore, on April 6, 2011, the court issued

an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty-one (21) days, why this action should not

be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc. 6). The time for compliance with

the show cause order has now elapsed, and Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee or file a complete

application to proceed in forma pauperis.

 Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 2nd day of May 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00074-RV-EMT Document 7 Filed 05/02/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:11cv74/RV/EMT

Case 3:11-cv-00074-RV-EMT Document 7 Filed 05/02/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CARLOS ALMEIDA,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv4-SPM/WCS

LAWRENCE REEL, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This case is before me upon an order of remand. Doc. 10. It went unnoticed that

Plaintiff had complied and submitted an in forma pauperis motion when I previously

entered the order to dismiss this case for failure to prosecute. Doc. 6. That error has

been corrected now, but in reviewing the complaint and preparing to enter an order on

Plaintiff's in forma pauperis motion, doc. 4, I find that venue is not appropriate in this

Court. 

Plaintiff is currently confined in Beaumont, Texas. Doc. 1, p. 2. Each of the four

named Defendants are located in Atlanta, Georgia. Id., at 1. The events about which

Plaintiff complains allegedly occurred first in Miami, Florida, when Plaintiff hurt his back,
Page 2 of 3

and then in Atlanta, Georgia where Plaintiff was transferred. Because Atlanta is where

the majority of the events occurred and is where Defendants are located, the proper

forum for this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 90(a) is in the

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. 

A federal district court has the authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to transfer a

case to another district or division "in which it could have been brought." A court may

raise the issue of defective venue sua sponte, but should not dismiss an improperly filed

case for lack of venue without giving the parties an opportunity to respond. Lipofsky v.

New York State Workers Comp. Bd., 861 F.2d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 1988). The

Lipofsky court did not place the same limitations on the court's ability to transfer a case

to the appropriate forum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). See Lipofsky, 861 F.2d at

1259, n. 2. Thus, it is recommended that the case be transferred rather than dismissed. 

In light of the foregoing, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404(a) and 1406(a), the

undersigned respectfully RECOMMENDS transfer of this action to the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, for all further

proceedings.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on April 15, 2010.

 s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Case No. 4:10cv4-SPM/WCS
Page 3 of 3

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv4-SPM/WCS
# C_2010242EN.01000401.xml

| 9.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 September 2010

2010/C 242/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2697 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 106,41 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4457 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82205 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2710 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2837 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8810 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,718 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 288,95 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9518 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2875 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9286 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3845 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3310 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8677 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7626 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7075 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 489,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2255 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6267 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2825 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 419,08 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9489 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,299 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,2301 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,405 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,1939 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5444 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,2399 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2697

JPY

Japanese yen

106,41

DKK

Danish krone

7,4457

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82205

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2710

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2837

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8810

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,718

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

288,95

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9518

RON

Romanian leu

4,2875

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9286

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3845

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3310

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8677

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7626

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7075

KRW

South Korean won

1 489,21

ZAR

South African rand

9,2255

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6267

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2825

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 419,08

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9489

PHP

Philippine peso

56,299

RUB

Russian rouble

39,2301

THB

Thai baht

39,405

BRL

Brazilian real

2,1939

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5444

INR

Indian rupee

59,2399

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**EXHIBIT      21**

**NATIONAL      HOLDINGS CORPORATION**

|                                           |   |                    |       |                     |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                                           |   |                    |       | Percentage               |   |
|                                           |   |                    |       | of                Voting |   |
|                                           |   | State                of |       | Securities               |   |
| Subsidiary                Name                 |   | Incorporation           |       | Owned                    |   |
|                                           |   |                    |       |                     |   |
| National                Securities Corporation |   |                    | Washington |                     |   | 100 | % |
|                                           |   |                    |       |                     |   |   |   |
| National                Insurance Corporation  |   |                    | Washington |                     |   | 100 | % |
|                                           |   |                    |       |                     |   |   |   |
| Robotic                Ventures Group LLC      |   |                    | Delaware   |                     |   | 24.5 | % |
|                                                |   |                    |       |                     |   |   |   |
|                                                |   |                    |       |                     |   |   |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

INDEPENDENT FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Independent Film Development Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeff Ritchie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  September 30, 2009



/s/ Jeff Ritchie

Jeff Ritchie

Chief Executive Officer
# C_2010275EN.01000302.xml

| 12.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5972 — CKI/HEH/EDF (UK Electricity Distribution Business))

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 275/05

On 7 October 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5972. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5972. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of the Interior National Park Service
 AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.
 ACTION: Public notice.
 SUMMARY: Pursuant to 36 CFR 51.23, public notice is hereby given that the 
                        ( print page 7080)
                        National Park Service proposes to extend the following expiring concession contracts for a period of up to 1 year, or until such time as a new contract is executed, whichever occurs sooner.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All of the listed concession authorizations will expire by their terms on or before December 31, 2006. The National Park Service has determined that the proposed short-term extensions are necessary in order to avoid interruption of visitor services and has taken all reasonable and appropriate steps to consider alternatives to avoid such interruption. These extensions will allow the National Park Service to complete and issue prospectuses leading to the competitive selection of concessioners for new long-term concession contracts covering these operations. *Conc ID No.*
*Concessioner name*
*Park*SHEN001-85
ARAMARK
Shenandoah National Park.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         January 1, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jo A. Pendry, Concession Program Manager, National Park Service, Washington, DC 20240; Telephone 202/513-7156. December 16, 2006. John Wessels, Acting Assistant Director, Business Services.


[FR Doc. 07-668  Filed 2-13-07; 8:45am] BILLING CODE 4312-53-M
DAVION HADDEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3138, 15-3139, 15-3140 

(CONSOLIDATED)

_____________________________/

Opinion filed August 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James C. Hankinson, Judge.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, General Counsel, and Melissa Joy Ford, Assistant Conflict 

Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY, KELSEY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DAVID KATZ,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-274/RS-MD

FDIC, as Receiver for PEOPLE’S 

FIRST COMMUNITY BANK, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________ 

UORDER

The relief requested in Defendant’s Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time for 

Defendant to File Responsive Pleading (Doc. 4) is GRANTED. Defendant shall file its 

response not later than December 14, 2010. 

ORDERED on November 30, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 72341]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Notice of Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to 
OMB for Review

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has 
submitted the following information collections to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 30 days of this 
notification. Comments should be sent via E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#387c594e515c676a574b4c535d4a7857555a165d5748165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="81c5e0f7e8e5ded3eef2f5eae4f3c1eeece3afe4eef1afe6eef7">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to 202-395-7285. Copies of submission may be 
obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Number: OMB 0412-0563.
    Form Number: AID 1570-14.
    Title: Report on Commodities.
    Type of Submission: Renewal of Information Collection.
    Purpose: The purpose of this information collection is to properly 
respond to the annual competition among applicants who apply on behalf 
of their sponsored overseas institutions and independent reviewers. 
ASHA needs to assess the strength and capability of the U.S. 
organizations, the overseas institutions and the merits of their 
proposed projects. Easily accessible historical records on past 
accomplishments and performance by repeat USOs, would speed the grant-
making process and provide documented reasons for both successful and 
unsuccessful applications.
    Annual Reporting Burden:

 Respondents: 65.
 Total annual responses: 260.
 Total annual hours requested: 650 hours.

    Dated: December 13, 2007.
Joanne Paskar,
Chief, Information and Records Division, Office of Administrative 
Services, Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. 07-6116 Filed 12-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2011022EN.01000301.xml

| 22.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 January 2011

2011/C 22/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3521 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,87 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4533 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84825 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9590 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3013 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8920 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,285 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,24 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7035 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8748 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2628 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1309 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3666 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3475 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5301 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7844 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7363 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 515,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6520 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,9013 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3945 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 251,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1374 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,127 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,5013 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,506 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2605 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3146 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,6820 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3521

JPY

Japanese yen

111,87

DKK

Danish krone

7,4533

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84825

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9590

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3013

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8920

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,285

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,24

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7035

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8748

RON

Romanian leu

4,2628

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1309

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3666

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3475

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5301

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7844

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7363

KRW

South Korean won

1 515,18

ZAR

South African rand

9,6520

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,9013

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3945

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 251,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1374

PHP

Philippine peso

60,127

RUB

Russian rouble

40,5013

THB

Thai baht

41,506

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2605

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3146

INR

Indian rupee

61,6820

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---