alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015434EN.01015501.xml

| 23.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 434/155 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 434/155

---

P7_TA(2012)0484

Voting in the event that the seat of a full member of a committee falls vacant (interpretation of Rule 187(1))

European Parliament decision of 11 December 2012 concerning voting in the event that the seat of a full member of a committee falls vacant (interpretation of Rule 187(1)) (2012/2254(REG))

(2015/C 434/19)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the letter of 27 November 2012 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the letter of 27 November 2012 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,

| — | having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 187(1):
  ‘In the event that the seat of a full member of a committee falls vacant, a permanent substitute from the same political group shall be entitled to vote in place of the full member, on a temporary basis pending the provisional replacement of the full member in accordance with Rule 186(5), or, in the absence of such provisional replacement, pending the appointment of a new full member. Such entitlement is based on Parliament's decision concerning the numerical composition of the committee, and aims at ensuring that the number of members of the political group concerned who can take part in the vote is equal to the number entitled to do so before the seat fell vacant.’ |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 187(1):

‘In the event that the seat of a full member of a committee falls vacant, a permanent substitute from the same political group shall be entitled to vote in place of the full member, on a temporary basis pending the provisional replacement of the full member in accordance with Rule 186(5), or, in the absence of such provisional replacement, pending the appointment of a new full member. Such entitlement is based on Parliament's decision concerning the numerical composition of the committee, and aims at ensuring that the number of members of the political group concerned who can take part in the vote is equal to the number entitled to do so before the seat fell vacant.’

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 208 (Monday, October 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61203-61204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5321]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property 
at Klamath Falls Airport, Klamath Falls, OR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION:  Notice of request to release airport property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the 
release of land at Klamath Falls Airport under the provisions of 
Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment Reform Act for 
the 21st Century (AIR 21), now 49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 28, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 
Northwest Mountain Region, Airports Division, Seattle Airports District 
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Suite 250, Renton, Washington 98057-
3356.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Mr. Derek Martin, Airport Director, at the 
following address: Klamath Falls Airport, 6775 Arnold Avenue, Klamath 
Falls, OR 97603.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Trang D. Tran, Civil Engineer, 
Federal Aviation Administration, Northwest Mountain Region, Seattle 
Airports District Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Suite 250, Renton, 
Washington 98057-3356.
    The request to release property may be reviewed, by appointment, in 
person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the 
request to release property at the Klamath Falls Airport under the 
provisions of the AIR 21 (49 U.S.C. 47107(h)(2)).
    On October 16, 2007, the FAA determined that the request to release 
property at Klamath Falls Airport submitted by the airport meets the 
procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA 
may approve the request, in whole or in part, no later than November 
28, 2007.
    The following is a brief overview of the request: Klamath Falls 
Airport is proposing the release of approximately 7.89 acres of airport 
property to the State of Oregon. The revenue generated from the land 
release will be used to fund Airport Improvement Projects.
    Any person may inspect, by appointment, the request in person at

[[Page 61204]]

the FAA office listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon appointment and request, inspect 
the application, notice and other documents germane to the application 
in person at Klamath Falls Airport.

    Dated: Issued in Renton, Washington on October 16, 2007.
Trang D. Tran,
Seattle Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 07-5321 Filed 10-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSHUA S. FRIEBEL and 

ELIZABETH F. FRIEBEL,

husband and wife,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-120/RS-EMT

PARADISE SHORES OF BAY COUNTY,

LLC, a Florida limited liability company, et al., 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested in Plaintiffs’ Motion to Enlarge Time to Respond to the 

Blackerby Defendants’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 347) is 

GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall respond not later than August 31, 2011. 

ORDERED on August 15, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00120-RS-CJK Document 348 Filed 08/15/11 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.**

**SECTION 1350)**

 

**
 
**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powergae, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Kovalenko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: June 13, 2008
#### STATE v. WERNER MOHRMANN.

(Filed 10 November, 1965.)

Appeal by defendant from *Clark, Special Judge,*Second July 1965 Special Criminal Session of Wake.

Criminal prosecutions on two separate warrants charging that defendant on June 27, 1964, (1) wilfully failed to stop at the scene of an accident and collision, in which the motor vehicle operated by him was involved, resulting in damage to the property of one Bartell Lane, a violation of G.S. 20-166 (b), and (2) operated a motor vehicle upon the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, a violation of G.S. 20-138, tried *de novo*in the superior court after appeals by defendant from convictions and judgments in the City Court of Raleigh.

The two cases were consolidated for trial.

The jury, with reference to the charge alleged in each warrant, returned a separate verdict of guilty as charged; and in each of the two cases, the court pronounced judgment that defendant pay a fine of $100.00 and costs. Defendant excepted and appealed.

*Attorney General Bruton, Assistant Attorney General Barham and Staff Attorney Partin for the State.*

*Earle R. Purser for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

There was ample evidence to support the verdict in respect of the charge alleged in each of the two warrants. Hence, the assignments of error directed to the court’s denial of defendant’s motions for judgments as of nonsuit are without merit.

Defendant’s other assignments of error do not comply with Rules 19(3) and 21. See Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 783, *et. seq.*“We have stated again and again that the error relied upon should be definitely and clearly presented, and the Court not compelled to go beyond the assignment of error itself to learn what the question is.” *Brown v. Brown,*264 N.C. 485, 488, 141 S.E. 2d *595875. Nor does defendant’s brief comply with Rule 28. See *Cudworth v. Insurance Co.,*243 N.C. 584, 585, 91 S.E. 2d 580. Notwithstanding, we have examined the general arguments set forth in defendant’s brief with reference to the assignments of error he attempts to bring forward. Suffice to say, such general arguments do not disclose prejudicial error.

No error.
# C_2010073EN.01001002.xml

| 23.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5554 — Havi/Keylux/STI Freight JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 73/03

On 16 March 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5554. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5554. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Converted by EDGARwiz


Lease Agreement




This lease agreement is between Paul Clewlow & Company ( The Company) and

Arazu Incorporated ( The Tenant), a US company incorporated in Florida USA.




The company grants the right to the tenant to occupy one area of the office, situated at 23 Barton Road, Market Bosworth, CV13 0LQ.

The area of the office is that the tenant can occupy is the outer office immediately adjacent to the main office. It comprises 400 sq ft with a shower and toilet facilities shared with the Company.

The Tenant is responsible for internal decoration and agrees to use the office purely for commercial office purposes relating to its Marketing Activities.

The desk and other office equipment remains the property of the Company and the Tenant is responsible for replacing any damaged equipment with a like for like replacement.

This agreement shall remain in force for a period of 12 months from the date of signature below.




The Tenant shall pay the Company the sum of $250 each calendar month for the use of the office.

The Company agrees to waive the right to be paid on the first day of each calendar month until such time as the Tenant has established the operation to which it is developing.

The rent for the office shall accrue at the said $250 per month and at the end of the 12 month period will vacate the premises or enter into a further agreement at the sole discretion of the Company.

If the Tenant has not paid to the Company any accrued rent at the end of the 12 month period the Company, may, at its absolute discretion, allow the same arrangement to continue into another period of lease, and agree to have the accrued rent rolled over into the next period, or to remain on its books as a debt due to the Company.







Signed

Signed 













For P Clewlow & Co

For Arazu Inc.




Date March 3 2014

Date March 3 2014
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CARL D. MORGAN,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv165/RH/MD

STEVE MEADOWS, et al.,

Defendants.

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon plaintiff's filing a civil rights complaint under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has failed either to submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

or pay the $350.00 filing fee. Plaintiff’s case cannot proceed until he either pays the filing

fee or files a properly completed in forma pauperis motion with supporting documentation.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk is directed to send plaintiff a complete set of forms needed for filing

a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number should be written on the form.

2. Plaintiff shall file either the completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis,

or payment in the amount of $350.00. A complete application to proceed in forma pauperis

includes a motion with supporting affidavit and a prisoner consent form and financial

certificate with attachments (a printout of the transactions in plaintiff’s inmate trust account

for the past six months) and must be filed in each case he has filed in this court. The

1

court will not process the complaint until all the required forms are submitted.

Thus, prisoners who have filed more than one case may be required to make payments totaling

1

40%, 60%, 80% or even 100% of their monthly deposits.
Page 2 of 2

3. Plaintiff shall do the above within twenty-eight (28) days from the date of the

docketing of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this case be

dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12 day of July, 2010. th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 5:10cv165/RH/MD
# C_2010078EN.01000301.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/3

---

Call for proposals for actions in the field of energy under the ‘Intelligent Energy — Europe’ Programme (Decision No 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 310, 9.11.2006, p. 15))

2010/C 78/03

The Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation (EACI) is hereby launching a call for proposals for the ‘Intelligent Energy — Europe’ 2010 work programme. The call is closing on 24 June 2010 for all types of actions.

Information on the modalities of the call and guidance to proposers on how to submit projects, is available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/call_for_proposals/index_en.htm

The helpdesk of the ‘Intelligent Energy — Europe’ programme can be reached on:

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/contact/index_en.htm

---
Case 1:10-cv-00187-MP-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/10 Page 1 of 9Case 1:10-cv-00187-MP-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/10 Page 2 of 9Case 1:10-cv-00187-MP-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/10 Page 3 of 9Case 1:10-cv-00187-MP-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/10 Page 4 of 9Case 1:10-cv-00187-MP-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/10 Page 5 of 9Case 1:10-cv-00187-MP-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/10 Page 6 of 9Case 1:10-cv-00187-MP-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/10 Page 7 of 9Case 1:10-cv-00187-MP-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/10 Page 8 of 9Case 1:10-cv-00187-MP-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/16/10 Page 9 of 9
# C_2009206EN.01000501.xml

| 1.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 August 2009

2009/C 206/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4272 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,10 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4431 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88135 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2191 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5168 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6070 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,376 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,85 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7031 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1040 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2238 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1480 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7087 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5793 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0620 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0973 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0602 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 783,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1136 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7486 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3640 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 390,15 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0259 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,667 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,4645 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,532 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7089 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,0246 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,7900 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4272

JPY

Japanese yen

133,10

DKK

Danish krone

7,4431

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88135

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2191

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5168

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6070

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,376

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,85

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7031

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1040

RON

Romanian leu

4,2238

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1480

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7087

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5793

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0620

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0973

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0602

KRW

South Korean won

1 783,28

ZAR

South African rand

11,1136

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7486

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3640

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 390,15

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0259

PHP

Philippine peso

69,667

RUB

Russian rouble

45,4645

THB

Thai baht

48,532

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7089

MXN

Mexican peso

19,0246

INR

Indian rupee

69,7900

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5238 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5238

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2018

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1234 Saint Johns Place in Brooklyn, New York, as the ``Major Robert 
                       Odell Owens Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAJOR ROBERT ODELL OWENS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1234 Saint Johns Place in Brooklyn, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Major Robert Odell Owens Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major 
Robert Odell Owens Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

VICTOR A. PEEL,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:11cv13/RS/CJK

JOHN PALMER, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

This prisoner civil rights case filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is before the Court

upon referral from the Clerk. On October 30, 2012, the Court entered an order

requiring plaintiffto file, within thirty days, an amended civil rights complaint. (Doc.

23). Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the order would result in a

recommendation that this case be dismissed. To date, plaintiff has not complied with

the order, and has not responded to the Court’s December 20, 2012 order (doc. 24)

requiring him to show cause, within fourteen days, why this case should not be

dismissed.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s

failure to comply with an order of the court.
Page 2 of 2

2. That the Clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida this 23rd day of January, 2013.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITEDSTATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No: 5:11cv13/RS/CJK
**Exhibit
      32.1**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Iris Biotechnologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended
      September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, James N. Welsh, Principal Executive Officer and
      Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section  1350
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the SecuritiesExchange
                Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350
      and
      is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      of
      the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
      general incorporation language in such filing.





Date:November
                13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                James N. WelshJames
                N. Welsh
              Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer