alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

QUAR’MARDEN QUAR’NAIN BRAND,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:10cv415/MCR/EMT

INMATE PHONE SERVICE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated January 21, 2011. (Doc. 17). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply

with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### SHORTT v. KNOB CITY INVESTMENT CO.

No. 472P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 123.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5549]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of New Fee Site; Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)

AGENCY: Coronado National Forest, USDA Forest Service, Tucson, AZ.

ACTION: Notice of New Fee Site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coronado National Forest proposes to begin charging a new 
$150.00 per day fee for rental of the Half Moon Ranch located 9 miles 
west of Sunsites, Arizona. Rental of the Cabin includes overnight use. 
Rental of the cabin and other facilities within the Arizona National 
Forests has shown that the public appreciates and enjoys the 
availability of historic rental facilities. Funds from the rentals will 
be used for the continued operation and maintenance of the Half Moon 
Ranch.

DATES: Half Moon Ranch will become available for rent July, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Coronado National Forest, 300 West Congress, Tucson, AZ 
85701.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Makansi, Archaeologist, Coronado 
National Forest, (520) 760-2502.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act 
(Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to 
publish a six month advance notice in the Federal Register whenever new 
recreation fee areas are established. The Coronado National Forest 
currently has one other rental facility. This facility is booked 
regularly throughout the rental season. A business analysis for the 
rental of the Half Moon Ranch shows that people desire having this sort 
of recreation experience on the Coronado National Forest. A market 
analysis indicates that the $150.00 daily fee is both reasonable and 
acceptable for this sort of unique recreation experience. People 
wanting to rent the Half Moon Ranch will need to do so through the 
National Recreation Reservation Service, at http://www.recreation.gov 
or by calling 1-877-444-6777. The National Recreation Reservation 
Service charges a $9 fee per reservation.

    Dated: November 1, 2007.
Jeanine Derby,
Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest.
[FR Doc. 07-5549 Filed 11-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5219 

To require sellers of opioids at retail to verify the identity of the prospective 

purchaser and enter certain information about the purchase into the 

respective State’s prescription drug monitoring system, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2018 

Mr. RODNEY DAVIS of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To require sellers of opioids at retail to verify the identity 

of the prospective purchaser and enter certain information about the purchase into the respective State’s prescription drug monitoring system, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Opioid Prescription 

5 Verification Act of 2018’’. 


srobinson on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5219 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR RETAIL SALE OF OPIOIDS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—In any State that maintains a 

3 prescription drug monitoring system, each regulated seller 

4 (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances 

5 Act (21 U.S.C. 802)) shall ensure that sales by such seller 

6 of an opioid at retail are made in accordance with the fol7 lowing: 

8 (1) The seller verifies the identity of the pro9 spective purchaser by requiring the prospective pur10 chaser to present— 

11 (A) an identification card that provides a 

12 photograph and is issued by a State or the Fed13 eral Government; or 

14 (B) a document that, with respect to iden15 tification, is considered acceptable for purposes 

16 of sections 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(A) and 

17 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(B) of title 8, Code of Federal 

18 Regulations (as in effect on or after March 9, 

19 2006). 

20 (2) The seller enters into the State’s prescrip21 tion drug monitoring system, at a minimum, the fol22 lowing information: 

23 (A) The name of the opioid. 

24 (B) The quantity sold. 

25 (C) The name and address of the pur26 chaser. 


srobinson on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5219 IH

1 (D) The name and address of the patient 

2 for whom the opioid is prescribed. 

3 (E) The date and approximate time of the 

4 sale. 

5 (b) DELAYED APPLICABILITY.—Subsection (a) ap6 plies to the sale of opioids at retail beginning on the date 

7 that is 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HPC POS System, Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal controls over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.   Dated:  May 16, 2011  /s/ Melvin W. Coles Melvin W. Coles Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosing controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15-d-15(f)) for the company and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluations; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By: /s/ Graham Briggs
 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CENTENNIAL BANK,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-309-RS-EMT

BERNARD S. SMITH

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Joint Notice of Settlement (Doc. 52). Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 

16.2(D), IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed from the active docket of the court.

2. In the event that the settlement between these parties is not consummated, the 

Court reserves jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within 60 days of 

the date of this Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and 

reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file for administrative purposes, and upon the 

expiration of 60 days without activity, the clerk is directed to close the case in 

its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on September 9, 2011.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00309-RS-EMT Document 53 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 1
| £ | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| OR     |
| T      | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934           |
| OR     |
| £ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934       |
| OR     |
| £ | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 1934            |
| Title of each class                                                                                                                             |   | Name of each exchange on which registered: |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
| Ordinary shares (traded in the form of American Depositary Shares, each American Depositary Share representing ten underlying ordinary shares.) |   | The New York Stock Exchange, Inc           |

----

----

----

----

| 12.1 | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002. |
|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 12.2 | Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002. |
|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 13.1 | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002. |
|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 13.2 | Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002. |
|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

|   | DRDGOLD LIMITED |
|--------|-----------------|
|   |            |   |
|   | By:   | /s/ D.J. Pretorius            |
|   |            | D.J. Pretorius |
|   |            | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |            |   |
|   | By:             | /s/ A.J. Davel                 |
|   |            | A.J. Davel |
|   |            | Chief Financial Officer |
# C_2009261EN.01002801.xml

| 31.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/28

---

Amendment to the 2009 call for proposals for indirect actions under the multi-annual Community Programme on protecting children using the Internet and other communication technologies

(Safer Internet)

(Safer Internet)

(Published in the Official Journal of the European Union C 132, of 11.6.2009, p. 10)

(Published in the Official Journal of the European Union C 132, of 11.6.2009, p. 10)

2009/C 261/15

The following amendment has been decided by the Commission on 29 October 2009 (1):

1

Paragraph 5

Paragraph 5

| for | : | ‘The indicative total budget available for this call under the 2009 budget is 9,333 M EUR of Community contribution. In order to ensure the objective of full coverage of the integrated European network of Safer Internet centres, the budget of the 2009 call for proposals may be reinforced by appropriations from the 2010 budget, subject to the adoption of the 2010 budget by the Budgetary Authority and to the availability of appropriations. Should such reinforcement be decided, it will occur before the deadline of this call.’ |
| --- | --- | --- |
| read | : | ‘The indicative total budget available for this call under the 2009 budget is EUR 9,333 million of Community contribution, and, in order to ensure the objective of full coverage of the integrated European network of Safer Internet Centres, EUR 7,317 million under the 2010 budget (2). The total budget available for this call is therefore EUR 16,650 million.’ |

for

:

‘The indicative total budget available for this call under the 2009 budget is 9,333 M EUR of Community contribution. In order to ensure the objective of full coverage of the integrated European network of Safer Internet centres, the budget of the 2009 call for proposals may be reinforced by appropriations from the 2010 budget, subject to the adoption of the 2010 budget by the Budgetary Authority and to the availability of appropriations. Should such reinforcement be decided, it will occur before the deadline of this call.’

read

:

‘The indicative total budget available for this call under the 2009 budget is EUR 9,333 million of Community contribution, and, in order to ensure the objective of full coverage of the integrated European network of Safer Internet Centres, EUR 7,317 million under the 2010 budget (2). The total budget available for this call is therefore EUR 16,650 million.’

2

All other provisions remain unchanged.

---

(1)  Commission Decision C(2009) 8301.

1

(2)  Subject to the adoption of the 2010 budget by the Budgetary Authority and to the availability of appropriations.

2

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-20468

Summary Calendar

 

LYNN JONES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF HOUSTON,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CV-200

--------------------

June 1, 2000

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lynn Jones appeals the district court’s summary judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against the City of

Houston. Jones argues 1) that the summary judgment was based

upon issues not raised by the parties -- whether Jones suffered a

constitutional violation and whether the defendant acted in bad

faith -- and that Jones was not given notice that the district

court was considering those issues, 2) that the district court

erred by applying Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51 (1988), to

Jones’ case, and 3) that there was evidence of bad faith and a
No. 99-20468

-2-

custom or policy of the Houston police department’s crime lab

violating Jones’ due process rights.

Our review of the record reveals that the parties

essentially presented the issue of bad faith when they discussed

whether crime lab personnel acted with deliberate indifference to

Jones’ rights by failing to expeditiously conduct DNA testing. 

The district court did not grant summary judgment on an issue not

addressed by the parties. See Washington v. Resolution Trust

Corp., 68 F.3d 935, 939-40 (5th Cir. 1995).

Regardless of the application of Youngblood, 488 U.S. at 57-

58, our de novo review reveals that there was no evidence that

the crime lab’s delay in Jones’ case was part of a policy or

custom of the crime lab. There was no evidence of a city custom

or policy violating Jones’ constitutional rights. See Bennett v.

Slidell, 728 F.2d 762, 767 (5th Cir. 1984) (en banc). The

summary judgment accordingly is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 7



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CanAlaska Ventures Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20F for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gordon Steblin, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Company.











Gordon Steblin

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

GREGORY EUGENE WEBSTER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv95/RS-EMT

ALEX FOSTER,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 

(Doc. 11). Plaintiff has not filed objections.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Order and Report and Recommendation is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice because of Plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on August 5, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE