alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ROBERT LEE BROWN,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00167-MP -AK

WALTER A MCNEAL,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at Gulf Correctional Institution and

challenges his conviction in the Circuit Court of Lake County, Florida. Jurisdiction is therefore

appropriate in either this district or in the United States District Court for the Middle District of

Florida, as the districts of confinement and conviction, respectively. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 

The district of conviction would appear to be the most convenient forum for witnesses

should an evidentiary hearing be necessary, and therefore, transfer of this cause to the Middle

District is appropriate. Mitchell v. Henderson, 432 F.2d 435, 436 (5th Cir. 1970) (division of

conviction, where witnesses were located, was appropriate venue over division of confinement in

challenge to conviction); Parker v. Singletary, 974 F.2d 1562, 1582, n. 118 (11th Cir. 1992)

(courts should give careful consideration to convenience of witnesses in transferring habeas
Page 2 of 2

1:09cv239-mmp/ak

corpus petitions under § 2241(d)). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

This case is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Middle District of Florida for all further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of August, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 68553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5935]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 5, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 68553]]



AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Notice of Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to 
OMB for Review

SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has 
submitted the following information collections to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 30 days of this 
notification. Comments should be sent via e-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#db9fbaadb2bf8489b4a8afb0bea99bb4b6b9f5beb4abf5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6f2b0e19060b303d001c1b040a1d2f00020d410a001f41080019">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to 202-395-7285. Copies of submission may be 
obtained by calling (202) 712-1365.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    OMB Number: OMB 0412-NEW.
    Form Number: N/A.
    Title: Partner Information Form.
    Type of Submission: New Information Collection.
    Purpose: The United States Agency for International Development 
(USAID). Office of Security, intends to collect information from 
approximately 2000 individuals and/or officers of non-governmental 
organizations (NGOs) who apply for USAID contracts, grants, cooperative 
agreements, other funding from USAID, or who apply for registration 
with USAID as Private and Voluntary Organizations (PVO). Collection of 
personally identifiable information from these individuals is 
specifically used to conduct screening to ensure that neither USAID 
funds nor USAID-funded activities inadvertently provide support to 
entities or individuals associated with terrorism.

Annual Reporting Burden

    Respondents: 2000.
    Total annual responses: 2000.
    Total annual hours requested: 500 hours.

    Dated: November 27, 2007.
Joanne Paskar,
Chief, Information and Records Division Office of Administrative 
Services Bureau for Management.
[FR Doc. 07-5935 Filed 12-4-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 68168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5912]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Mitochondria in Neurodegenerative Disease.
    Date: December 9-10, 2007.
    Time: 6 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: William Cruce, PhD., Health Scientist 
Administrator, Scientific Review Office, National Institute on 
Aging, National Institutes of Health, Room 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-402-7704, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9af9e8eff9ffeddaf4f3fbb4f4f3f2b4fdf5ec"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="afccdddacccad8efc1c6ce81c1c6c781c8c0d9">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Cell Quiescence.
    Date: December 13-14, 2007.
    Time: 6 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 
Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: William Cruce, PhD., Health Scientist 
Administrator, Scientific Review Office, National Institute on 
Aging, National Institutes of Health, Room 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin 
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-402-7704, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f2c3d3a2c2a380f21262e6121262761282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f6958483959381b6989f97d8989f9ed8919980">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 26, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5912 Filed 12-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BERNARD RALPH GRAVES, 

 Petitioner,

vs. 3:10cv375/WS/MD

MIKE BABCOCK,

 Respondent.

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon petitioner's filing a petition for writ of habeas

corpus along with exhibits and an accompanying memorandum, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2241 (doc. 1). He also filed a motion for limited, expedited discovery and a motion to fix

time for filing an expedited answer. (Doc. 2 & 3). The petition appears to be in the proper

form, the petitioner has submitted the appropriate service copies and the filing fee has

been paid.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The clerk of court is directed to furnish copies of the petition, including attachments,

and this order to the Respondent and the United States Attorney for this district. 

Respondent shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order in which to show cause,

if any there be, why the relief requested should not be granted.

Petitioner’s request for limited discovery (doc. 2) is DENIED.

Petitioner’s motion to fix time for filing an expedited answer (doc. 3) is GRANTED

to the extent this order has issued.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15 day of October, 2010. th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SpectrumDNA, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                June 27, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                James A. BanisterJames
                A. Banister,President
                and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)Dated:
                June 27, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Kelly A. McCrystalKelly
                A. McCrystal,Chief
                Operating Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer andPrincipal
                Accounting Officer)
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IVAN HARVEY,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:09cv402-WS

EFIONG O. ANDEM, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed 

September 20, 2011. Doc. 114. The magistrate judge recommends that this cause be

dismissed with prejudice consistent with the parties joint notice of voluntary dismissal. 

The parties having resolved the case through settlement, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is ADOPTED and

incorporated by reference into this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Red. R. Civ. P. 41

(a)(1)(A)(ii).

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE." 

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of September , 2011.

Case 3:09-cv-00402-WS-CJK Document 117 Filed 09/26/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00402-WS-CJK Document 117 Filed 09/26/11 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 1 of 12
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 2 of 12
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 3 of 12
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 4 of 12
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 5 of 12
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 6 of 12
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 7 of 12
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 8 of 12
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 9 of 12
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 10 of 12
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 11 of 12
Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 01/10/11 Page 12 of 12
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-135076, No. 333-116930,No. 333-107525, No. 333-90045, No. 333-77943, No. 333-33038, No. 333-39396, No. 333-67692, and No. 333-70334) of Autobytel Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 15, 2007 relating to our audit of theconsolidated financial statements, financial statement schedule and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Autobytel Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

 

Our report dated March 15, 2007, on management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment that the effectivenessof the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and an opinion that theCompany had not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of theTreadway Commission (COSO). 

 

/s/    MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP 

 

Irvine, California 

March 15, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Clean Water
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") for the for the period ended June 24, 2005
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Suzanne
Lewsadder, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates
presented and consolidated results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.

Dated: September 28, 2006

By: /s/ Suzanne Lewsadder
    Suzanne Lewsadder
    Chief Executive Officer
    Chief Accounting Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6415
FATAI O. OKEDEJI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus E. MONTGOMERY TUCKER, Virginia Parole Board, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-97-625) Submitted: May 28, 1998 Decided: June 10, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Fatai O. Okedeji, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Fatai O. Okedeji, a Virginia inmate, appeals the districtcourt's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1915(e)(2), 1915A (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Okedeji v. Tucker , No. CA-97-625 (E.D. Va. Mar. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Ex. 31.1  CERTIFICATIONS I, David Rogers, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of International Industrial Enterprises;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  August 11, 2008     /s/ David Rogers David Rogers Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-50774

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARTIMIANO CAYETANO-GASPAR,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:09-CR-1357-1

Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Martimiano Cayetano-Gaspar appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation in violation of

8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the sentence is substantively unreasonable

because it is greater than necessary to accomplish the sentencing goals set forth

in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). The Government has moved for summary affirmance or,

in the alternative, for an extension of time in which to file an appellate brief.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 1, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-50774 Document: 00511773450 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/01/2012
No. 10-50774

Cayetano-Gaspar has completed his sentence, has been released from

custody, and has been removed to Mexico. The appeal of his sentence is

therefore moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5th

Cir. 2007). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. The Government’s motions

for summary affirmance and for an extension of time are DENIED as moot.

2

Case: 10-50774 Document: 00511773450 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/01/2012
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 of
Lorillard, Inc.:2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 4, 2008By:
    /s/ Martin L. OrlowskyMartin L. OrlowskyChairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer 38