alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011003EN.01000201.xml

| 6.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6026 — CRH/Bauking)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 3/03

On 16 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6026. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6026. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of HPC POS System, Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Kinney, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Dated:  February 17, 2011  /s/ Melvin W. Coles Melvin W. Coles Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






The undersigned, Haim Mayan, the interim Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer of InfoSpi, Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Amended Form 10-Q of InfoSpi, Inc. for quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of InfoSpi, Inc.




Date: August 11, 2010




/s/ "Haim Mayan"Haim Mayan

Interim Chief Executive Officer






/s/ "Haim Mayan"Haim Mayan

Interim Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to InfoSpi, Inc. and will be retained by InfoSpi, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Sidney DUNHAM, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 16274.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

July 14, 1965.

Sidney Dunham, in pro. per.

William E. Scent, U. S. Atty., Boyce F. Martin, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Louisville, Ky., for appellee.

Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and MILLER and CECIL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky denying the appellant’s motion to vacate his sentence under Section 2255, Title 28, U.S.C. The appellant, Sidney Dunham, was convicted on three counts of an indictment charging the unlawful sale and possession of marihuana, in violation of Sections 4742(a) and 4744(a), Title 26, U.S.C.

The appellant was sentenced to ten years on count one and to five years on each of counts two and three. The sentences were all to run concurrently with each other. A fine of one dollar was assessed against the appellant on each count. The appellant concedes that there are no known defects in counts two and three and that he would not be entitled to his freedom until he has served his time on those sentences.

The sole question presented on this appeal is whether count one of the indictment is invalid for the reason that the name of the transferee was not alleged therein. Count one alleged that: “On or about the 7th day of July, 1962, in the Western District of Kentucky, Sidney Dunham unlawfully transferred and sold to a certain person for the sum of $25.00 a quantity * * * of marihuana, * * * in violation of Section 4742(a), Title 26, United States Code.”

The appellant bases his claim on Lauer v. United States, 320 F.2d 187, decided by the Seventh Circuit. Being aware that this Court has not followed Lauer1 he argues that he is denied a right to bring a habeas corpus action in Indiana. Since the appellant is confined in a federal penitentiary in Terre Haute, Indiana, he claims that his constitutional right to the writ of habeas corpus has been suspended by the requirement to *591bring his action under Section 2255, Title 28, U.S.C. Without laboring this question, suffice it to say that the Seventh Circuit has overruled Lauer. Collins v. Markley, 346 F.2d 230, C.A.7.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

1

. Bush v. United States, 347 F.2d 231, C.A.6; United States v. Dickerson, 337 F.2d 343, C.A.6; Cochran v. United States, 336 F.2d 799, C.A.6; Taylor v. United States, No. 15530 (C.A.6, 1964); Smith v. United States, 338 F.2d 996, C.A.6; United States v. Lamar, 337 F.2d 349, C.A.6.
# C_2011019EN.01000301.xml

| 20.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2011/C 19/04

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Netherlands

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by the Netherlands

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: The Netherlands

Subject of commemoration: The 500th anniversary of the issue of the world famous book ‘Laus Stultitiae’ by the Dutch philosopher, humanist and theologian Desiderus Erasmus

Description of the design: The inner part of the coin depicts Erasmus writing his book and the effigy of Queen Beatrix. Between these two images, the inscription ‘Beatrix Koningin der Nederlanden’ vertically positioned, the year ‘2011’, the Mint master mark and the mintmark.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European Union flag.

Volume of issuance: 4 million coins

Date of issue: January 2011

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-20      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 1 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-20      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 2 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-20      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 3 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-20      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 4 of 5

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-20      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         369,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  882,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,000
<INVENTORY>                                    549,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,917,000
<PP&E>                                       1,036,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (364,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,099,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,239,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     6,768,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,099,000
<SALES>                                      6,008,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,008,000
<CGS>                                        4,219,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,367,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             236,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,107,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,107,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,107,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.48)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5349 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5349

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  1325 Autumn Avenue in Memphis, Tennessee, as the ``Judge Russell B. 
                    Sugarmon Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JUDGE RUSSELL B. SUGARMON POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1325 Autumn Avenue in Memphis, Tennessee, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Judge Russell B. Sugarmon Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Judge 
Russell B. Sugarmon Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DARRYL D. MOREFIELD,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:11cv161-WS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,,

Commissioner of Social 

Security Administration,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

May 16, 2012. See Doc. 13. The magistrate judge recommends that the

Commissioner's decision with respect to the plaintiff's application for benefits be

affirmed. The plaintiff has filed a one-sentence objection (doc. 14) to the report and

recommendation. Specifically, the plaintiff states that he "respectfully objects to the

Report and Recommendation on all the grounds set forth in his Memorandum in

Support of Complaint." 

Having reviewed the record in light of the plaintiff's objections, this court finds that

the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. Because the

record contains substantial evidence to support the Commissioner's partially

Case 3:11-cv-00161-WS-EMT Document 15 Filed 06/04/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

unfavorable decision and because the plaintiff failed to show that the ALJ applied

improper legal standards, it is ORDERED:

1. The court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's report and recommendation to

affirm the Commissioner's decision.

2. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

3. The clerk shall close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of June , 2012.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:11-cv-00161-WS-EMT Document 15 Filed 06/04/12 Page 2 of 2
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 

JORGE MICHAEL VANEGAS, 

 Petitioner, 

v. CASE NO. 4:11-cv-74-MW/CAS 

MICHAEL D. CREWS, Secretary, 

Florida Department of Corrections, 

 

 Respondent.

______________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION

 This Court has considered the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation, 

ECF No.14, filed October 23, 2013, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s 

Objections to the Report and Recommendation, ECF No.17, filed November 26, 

2013. Upon consideration, 

 IT IS ORDERED: 

 The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The Petitioner’s §2254 petition, 
2 

ECF No. 1, is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, and leave to 

appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.” The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on November 27, 2013. 

 s/Mark E. Walker 

 United States District Judge
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00810

- CV

CODY TEXAS, L.P.

, Appellant

v.

BPL EXPLORATION, LTD

. , Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 8,665

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE THE EN BANC COURT 1

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we OVERRULE our December 14,

2016 opinion in appeal n umber 04

- 16

- 00078

- CV, RECALL the mandate in that appeal, and

PERMANENTLY SUSPEND enforcement of our December 14, 2016 judgment in that appeal.

The trial court’s November 15, 2017 final judgment in the underlying cause is VACATED, and

we RENDER judgment denying appellant Cody Texas, L.P.’s petition for bill of review.

We ORDER that appellant and appellee each bear their own costs of this appeal, if any.

SIGNED December 11, 2019.

_____________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice

1 Justice Rebeca C. Martinez is recused.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

FRANKLIN D. RUSSELL,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 3:10cv155/MCR/MD

FREEPORT SHIPBUILDING HULL

#267, INC., SUNQUEST CRUISES, IN ADMIRALTY

INC., in personam, AND THE M/V

SOLARIS, her hull, engines, rigging,

tackle, appurtenances, etc., in rem,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement of this

matter. Therefore, the above-entitled action is DISMISSED from the active docket of the

Court. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the Court reserves the power,

upon motion filed by any party within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, to amend or

vacate and set aside this Order of Dismissal and reinstate this case. At this time, the Clerk

is directed to close the file in this case for administrative purposes, and upon the expiration

of sixty (60) days without activity, the Clerk is directed to close the case in its entirety for

all purposes.

ORDERED on this 22nd day of October, 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Knology, Inc. (the
Company) that, to his knowledge, this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 27, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Robert K. Mills    
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Robert K. Mills        
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

This exhibit shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the
date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report of Platinum  SuperYachts,  Inc. on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Ron
Ruskowsky,  President,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Ron Ruskowsky
Ron Ruskowsky,
President, CEO and Principal Executive and Accounting Officer


March 26, 2004


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011039EN.01S00301.xml

| 8.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/s3

---

NOTICE

On 8 February 2011, in Official Journal of the European Union C 39 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — first supplement to the 29th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134193 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134193 COA: 277046 Wayne CC: 05-011193-01 TYRONE ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 26, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RUFUS S. MILLER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-00276-RS-GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Respondents’ Fourth Motion For Enlargement

Of Time. (Doc. 16.) Respondents seek a third 30 day extension of time to respond to

the Petition. (Doc. 1.) 

Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Respondents’ Fourth Motion For Enlargement Of Time (Doc. 16) is

GRANTED. Respondents shall file their response to the Petition on or

before June 3, 2011.

2. Petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed on or before July 5, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5 day of May, 2011. th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00276-MW-GRJ Document 17 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 1