alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER BUSH,

Petitioner, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-252/RS-EMT

PAIGE AUGUSTINE, WARDEN,

Respondent. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38). No 

objections have been filed. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated 

by reference in this Order. 

2. The case, along with member case 5:10cv280/RS-EMT are dismissed without 

prejudice for Petitioner’s failure to comply with an order of the court and failure 

to keep the court apprised of his current address. 

3. The clerk is directed to close those cases. 

ORDERED on January 23, 2012.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00252-RS-EMT Document 40 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      39,551,044              18,668,703
<SECURITIES>                                11,755,628               1,442,814
<RECEIVABLES>                              437,287,437             250,688,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,401,916               2,654,114
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                       2,175,188                 619,222
<DEPRECIATION>                                 421,980                 202,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             504,671,115             272,354,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      257,117,548             184,524,758
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       134,142                  96,703
<OTHER-SE>                                 247,419,425              87,733,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               504,671,115             272,354,946
<SALES>                                     57,706,860              27,745,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            64,089,366              29,327,929
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,434,451               7,219,372
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,953,498               1,315,122
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,629,466               7,921,330
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             33,071,951              12,872,105
<INCOME-TAX>                                13,264,049               4,877,257
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         19,807,902               7,994,848
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                19,807,902               7,994,848
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.57                     .99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52                     .96
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 222 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 222

   To amend section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, to require 
 payment of interest on back pay for employees affected by a lapse in 
                            appropriations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 24, 2019

  Mr. Jones (for himself, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. 
   Hirono, Mr. Wyden, Ms. Baldwin, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mrs. Shaheen) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend section 1341 of title 31, United States Code, to require 
 payment of interest on back pay for employees affected by a lapse in 
                            appropriations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Back Pay Fairness Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. INTEREST ON BACK PAY FOR EMPLOYEES AFFECTED BY A LAPSE IN 
              APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1341(c) of title 31, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (3) as paragraph (4); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (2) the following:
    ``(3)(A) If a payment under paragraph (2) to an employee furloughed 
as a result of a covered lapse in appropriations or to an excepted 
employee is made after the regularly scheduled pay date for such 
payment in the absence of a lapse in appropriations, the payment shall 
include an interest payment prorated daily which shall accrue from such 
regularly scheduled pay date.
    ``(B) An interest payment under subparagraph (A)--
            ``(i) shall be computed at the rate of interest established 
        by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 3902 that is in 
        effect on the first day of the covered lapse in appropriations; 
        and
            ``(ii) shall be in addition to any other remedy available 
        under any other law, rule, or regulation.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by this section shall apply 
with respect to any covered lapse in appropriations (as defined in 
section 1341(c) of title 31, United States Code) that begins before, 
on, or after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2010315EN.01000201.xml

| 19.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 November 2010

2010/C 315/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3647 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4549 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85220 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3573 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3475 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1620 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,648 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,09 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9375 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2980 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9747 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3812 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3895 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5816 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7577 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7672 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 542,77 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5363 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0529 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3945 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 203,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2612 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,350 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,3910 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,859 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3385 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7858 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,7250 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3647

JPY

Japanese yen

113,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4549

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85220

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3573

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3475

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1620

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,648

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,09

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9375

RON

Romanian leu

4,2980

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9747

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3812

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3895

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5816

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7577

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7672

KRW

South Korean won

1 542,77

ZAR

South African rand

9,5363

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0529

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3945

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 203,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2612

PHP

Philippine peso

59,350

RUB

Russian rouble

42,3910

THB

Thai baht

40,859

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3385

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7858

INR

Indian rupee

61,7250

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Case 5:10-cr-00056-RS Document 1 Filed 12/08/10 Page 1 of 3Case 5:10-cr-00056-RS Document 1 Filed 12/08/10 Page 2 of 3Case 5:10-cr-00056-RS Document 1 Filed 12/08/10 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BARBARA H. ENGBERG,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv64/RV/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated December 13, 2012 (doc. 46). The parties have been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The Motion for Attorney Fees Under Title 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (doc. 44) is

GRANTED.

3. Plaintiff’s counsel, Stacey Penn Clark, is awarded attorney’s fees in the total amount

of $13,767.43, which shall be paid out of Plaintiff’s past due benefits. 

 4. Upon receipt of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406:

(a) in the amount of $13,767.43, Plaintiff’s counsel, Stacey Penn Clark, shall

immediately refund to Plaintiff the previously awarded EAJA fee in the amount of $5,750.00 and

the previously awarded sum of $5,214.00; or
Page 2 of 2

(b) in the amount of $8,553.43, Plaintiff’s counsel, Stacey Penn Clark, shall

immediately refund to Plaintiff the previously awarded EAJA fee in the amount of $5,750.00. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of January, 2013.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:10cv64/RV/EMT
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOSEPH P. WILBERT,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv310/RV/EMT

ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

Defendants.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated November 2, 2010 (Doc. 7). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of December, 2010.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2011070EN.01S00301.xml

| 4.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/s3

---

NOTICE

On 4 March 2011, in Official Journal of the European Union C 70 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — second supplement to the 29th complete edition’ and ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — second supplement to the 29th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
Exhibit 23(a) 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement Nos. 333-37652, 333-84418, 333-84418-01, 333-84418-02, 333-110125 and Amendment No. 1 thereto, 333-103922, and 333-115159 on Form S-3; and Registration Statement Nos. 333-32833, 333-32837, 333-45657, 333-46671, 333-62014,333-92260, 333-105133, 333-125169 and Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-125169 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 1, 2006, relating to the financial statements of TXU Corp. (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and contains explanatory paragraphs relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004) and the rescission of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 98-10) and management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of TXU Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2005. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Dallas,Texas 

March 1, 2006
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SYLVIA SHARP,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv374-RH/WCS

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, 

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed an amended civil rights action on September 23,

2010, doc. 6, and service was directed on the seven named Defendants on November

16, 2010. Doc. 12. Service was returned unexecuted on three of the Defendants

(Butts, Caldwell, and Hanley), doc. 14, and stating that two of those Defendants have

retired and Defendant Butts was transferred. Id. By court order entered on January 21,

2011, the Warden was directed to advise whether a last known address for those three

Defendants could be provided in confidence to the United States Marshals service. 

Doc. 19. The deadline for doing so was February 28, 2011, doc. 19, and a clear

response was not provided to that motion. Nevertheless, a limited notice of appearance

Case 4:10-cv-00374-RH -WCS Document 25 Filed 03/14/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

has been filed, and all seven Defendants have filed a motion for judgment in favor of the

Defendants, asserting that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Doc. 24. 

This order advises Plaintiff to respond to the motion. Plaintiff is advised that she

must file her response no later than April 15, 2011. If Plaintiff does not agree that she

failed to exhaust administrative remedies, Plaintiff should submit copies of all

grievances she filed concerning the events raised in this case. If Plaintiff agrees that

she did not exhaust administrative remedies, Plaintiff may simply file a notice of

voluntary dismissal under FED. R. CIV. P. 41. Finally, Plaintiff is advised that pursuant to

the local rules of this Court, failure to file a response may be sufficient cause to grant

the unopposed motion. N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(C)(1). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff shall have until April 15, 2011, to file a response to Defendants'

motion for judgment as a matter of law, doc. 24.

2. Failure to comply with this Court order may result in a recommendation

of dismissal of this action.

3. Plaintiff shall immediately file a notice to the Clerk's Office in the event that

her address changes or she is transferred or released from custody.

4. The Clerk of Court shall return this file to me upon receipt of Plaintiff's

response or no later than April 15, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED on March 14, 2011.

S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 4:10cv374-RH/WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00374-RH -WCS Document 25 Filed 03/14/11 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023458
<NAME> AEI INCOME & GROWTH FUND XXII LTD PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         247,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               247,401
<PP&E>                                      13,363,547
<DEPRECIATION>                               (201,635)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,409,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          271,826
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  13,137,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,409,313
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               984,858
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  377,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                607,149
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            607,149
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   607,149
<EPS-BASIC>                                      35.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    35.10


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          43,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     44,327
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,952
<PP&E>                                         130,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 246,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,974
<BONDS>                                        129,050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,533
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,851)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   246,522
<SALES>                                         55,102
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,102
<CGS>                                           38,014
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,408
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,811
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,343
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,468
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 231 (Monday, December 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67994-67995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5900]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Random Drug and Alcohol Testing Percentage Rates of Covered 
Aviation Employees for the Period of January 1, 2008 Through December 
31, 2008

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA has determined that the minimum random drug and 
alcohol testing percentage rates for the period January 1, 2008 through 
December 31, 2008 will remain at 25 percent of safety-sensitive 
employees for random drug testing and 10 percent of safety-sensitive 
employees for random alcohol testing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jeffrey Stookey, Office of 
Aerospace Medicine, Drug Abatement Division, Program Administration 
Branch (AAM-810), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence 
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-8442.
    Discussion: Pursuant to 14 CFR part 121, appendix I, section V.C, 
the FAA Administrator's decision on whether to change the minimum 
annual random drug testing rate is based on the reported random drug 
test positive rate for the entire aviation industry. If the reported 
random drug test positive rate is less than 1.00%, the Administrator 
may continue the minimum random drug testing rate at 25%. In 2006, the 
random drug test positive rate was 0.55%. Therefore, the minimum random 
drug testing rate will remain at 25% for calendar year 2008.
    Similarly, 14 CFR part 121, appendix J, section III.C, requires the 
decision on

[[Page 67995]]

the minimum annual random alcohol testing rate to be based on the 
random alcohol test violation rate. If the violation rate remains less 
than 0.50%, the Administrator may continue the minimum random alcohol 
testing rate at 10%. In 2006, the random alcohol test violation rate 
was 0.08%. Therefore, the minimum random alcohol testing rate will 
remain at 10% for calendar year 2008.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you have questions about how the annual 
random testing percentage rates are determined, please refer to the 
Code of Federal Regulations Title 14: part 121, appendix I, section V.C 
(for drug testing), and appendix J, section III.C (for alcohol 
testing).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 26, 2007.
Frederick E. Tilton,
Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. 07-5900 Filed 11-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M