alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cr58-SPM

RHONDA LEANNE JOHNSON,

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One and Two of this

indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing

Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a

report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties

consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it

is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.
Page 2 of 3

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

4:10cr58-SPM/WCS
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on September 15, 2010. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

4:10cr58-SPM/WCS
# C_2010078EN.01000201.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 March 2010

2010/C 78/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3353 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,00 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4418 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90040 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7083 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4286 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0980 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,418 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,03 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7078 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8893 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0718 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0521 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4778 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3721 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3653 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8975 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8756 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 520,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9557 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1161 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2628 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 169,47 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4152 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,769 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,5250 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,284 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4324 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7447 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,3800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3353

JPY

Japanese yen

124,00

DKK

Danish krone

7,4418

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90040

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7083

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4286

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0980

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,418

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,03

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7078

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8893

RON

Romanian leu

4,0718

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0521

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4778

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3721

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3653

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8975

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8756

KRW

South Korean won

1 520,62

ZAR

South African rand

9,9557

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1161

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2628

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 169,47

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4152

PHP

Philippine peso

60,769

RUB

Russian rouble

39,5250

THB

Thai baht

43,284

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4324

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7447

INR

Indian rupee

60,3800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global MobileTech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Hon Kit Wong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|  

 

Dated:  June 27, 2011

By: /s/ Hon Kit Wong

 

       Hon Kit Wong

 

       Chief Financial Officer

 

       (Principal Financial and   

        Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Case 4:10-cv-00396-RH -WCS Document 4 Filed 09/17/10 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:10-cv-00396-RH -WCS Document 4 Filed 09/17/10 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:10-cv-00396-RH -WCS Document 4 Filed 09/17/10 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:10-cv-00396-RH -WCS Document 4 Filed 09/17/10 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:10-cv-00396-RH -WCS Document 4 Filed 09/17/10 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:10-cv-00396-RH -WCS Document 4 Filed 09/17/10 Page 6 of 6
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00569-CV

Paul Gajkowski, Appellant

v.

CACH, LLC, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 26858, HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Paul Gajkowski has filed an unopposed motion to dismissthis appeal. We

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: April 29, 2010
EXHIBIT 11.1

EFJ, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE

December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005

(in thousands, except share and per share data)



|                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | ---- |  | - | ----------
|                                                     |  | 2007 |            |   | 2006 |   |            | 2005
|Net income (loss)                                    |  | $    | (37,653    | ) |      | $ | (6,781     | )    |  | $ | 22,549    
|                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           
|Net income per share  Basic:                        |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           
|Weighted average common sharesBasic                 |  |      | 26,039,246 |   |      |   | 25,844,956 |      |  |   | 20,984,688
|                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           
|Net income (loss) per share  Basic                  |  | $    | (1.45      | ) |      | $ | (0.26      | )    |  | $ | 1.07      
|                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           
|Net income per share  Diluted:                      |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           
|                                                     |  |      |           
|Shares used in this computation:                     |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           
|Weighted average common shares  Basic               |  |      | 26,039,246 |   |      |   | 25,844,956 |      |  |   | 20,984,688
|Dilutive effect of shares under employee stock plans |  |      | 67,570     |   |      |   | 151,430    |      |  |   | 247,670   
|Weighted average restricted shares granted           |  |      | 297,405    |   |      |   | 210,856    |      |  |   | 21,425    
|Weighted average common sharesDiluted               |  |      | 26,404,221 |   |      |   | 26,207,242 |      |  |   | 21,253,783
|                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           
|Net income (loss) per share  Diluted                |  | $    | (1.45      | ) |      | $ | (0.26      | )    |  | $ | 1.06      
|                                                     |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |           

Although we have disclosed both basic and dilutive weighted average common shares, only basic
weighted average shares were used to compute earnings per share in years in which there is a net loss.
Dismisse d and Opinion Filed October 21 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00298

- CV

TFHSP SERIES LLC, SE RIES MAT

- 1 , Appellant

V.

MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST CO MPANY, D/B/A M&T BAN K , Appellee

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 01401



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice O'Neill 1 , and Justice Rosenberg 2

Opinion by J ustice Rosenberg

Before the Court is the appellant’s October 4 , 2019 unopposed motion to dismiss advising

that the partie s have reached an agreement. Accordingly , appellant no longer wish es to pursue this

appeal. We GRANT the motion and DISMISS the appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a)(1).

180298f.p05

1 The Hon. Michael J. O'Neill, Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas, Retired, sitting by assignment.

2 The Hon. Barbara Rosenberg, Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fifth District of Texas at Dallas, sitting by ass ignment. /Barbara Rosenberg/
BARBARA ROSENBERG JUSTICE, ASSIGNED– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

TFHSP SERIES LLC, SERIES MAT

- 1, Appellant

No. 05

- 18

- 00298

- CV V.

MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY, D/B/A M&T BANK, Appellee On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 01401. Opinion delivered by Justice Rosenberg. Chief Justice Burns and Justice O’Neill

pa rticipating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 21st day of October 2019.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 125 (Friday, June 29, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-55506]



ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for 
Source Categories

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 63 (Sec. Sec.  
63.600 to 63.1199), revised as of July 1, 2006, in Sec.  63.1103, 
paragraph (e)(2), on page 547, in alphabetical order, add the 
definition of ``Organic HAP'' to read as follows:


Sec.  63.1103  Source category-specific applicability, definitions, and 
requirements.

* * * * *
    (e)* * *
    (2)* * *
    Organic HAP means the compounds listed in Table 1 to subpart XX of 
this part.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 07-55506 Filed 6-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7560** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MARK NATHANIEL HOPE, a/k/a Askare El Bey , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 5:06

- cr - 00167

- F

- 1; 5:09

- cv - 00219

- F )

Submitted : April 26, 2012 Decided: April 30, 2012

Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Mark Nathaniel Hope, Appellant Pro Se. Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Mark Nathaniel Hope seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2011 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S . 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right
. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hope has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the fa cts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# CE2013168EN.01014201.xml

| 14.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 168/142 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 168/142

---

Tuesday 13 December 2011Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors (Mr H. Otbo - DK)

P7_TA(2011)0553

European Parliament decision of 13 December 2011 on the nomination of Henrik Otbo as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C7-0345/2011 – 2011/0810(NLE))

2013/C 168 E/27

(Consultation)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0345/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0345/2011),

| — | having regard to the fact that at its meeting of 23 November 2011 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the fact that at its meeting of 23 November 2011 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors,

| — | having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0416/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0416/2011),

| A. | whereas Henrik Otbo fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Henrik Otbo fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council's nomination of Henrik Otbo as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council's nomination of Henrik Otbo as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trevenex Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Scott Wetzel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                          |                        
|------------------------- | -----------------------
|Dated:  November 12, 2008 | By: /s/ Scott Wetzel   
|                          | Scott Wetzel           
|                          | Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010273EN.01000101.xml

| 9.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 October 2010

2010/C 273/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3874 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,21 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4562 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87510 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3170 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3420 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1000 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,490 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9765 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2643 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9782 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4252 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4168 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7641 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8598 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8198 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 565,97 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,5991 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2548 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3173 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 393,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3220 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,328 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,5930 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,709 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3394 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4337 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,6350 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3874

JPY

Japanese yen

114,21

DKK

Danish krone

7,4562

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87510

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3170

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3420

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1000

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,490

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9765

RON

Romanian leu

4,2643

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9782

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4252

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4168

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7641

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8598

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8198

KRW

South Korean won

1 565,97

ZAR

South African rand

9,5991

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2548

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3173

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 393,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3220

PHP

Philippine peso

60,328

RUB

Russian rouble

41,5930

THB

Thai baht

41,709

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3394

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4337

INR

Indian rupee

61,6350

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TECHSHELL, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv154/RS-MD

HARD CANDY CASES, LLC;

Defendant.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Defendant’s Motion To File Under Seal (Doc. 160) is granted.

ORDERED on March 8, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE