alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009215EN.01000101.xml

| 9.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 September 2009

2009/C 215/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4473 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4438 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87365 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1867 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5159 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5690 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,479 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,98 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7021 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0893 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2412 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1521 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6770 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5483 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2169 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0790 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0644 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 783,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,9076 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8814 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3414 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 458,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0684 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,979 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,3700 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,244 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6436 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,2419 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,1140 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4473

JPY

Japanese yen

133,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4438

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87365

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1867

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5159

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5690

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,479

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,98

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7021

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0893

RON

Romanian leu

4,2412

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1521

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6770

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5483

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2169

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0790

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0644

KRW

South Korean won

1 783,31

ZAR

South African rand

10,9076

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8814

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3414

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 458,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0684

PHP

Philippine peso

69,979

RUB

Russian rouble

45,3700

THB

Thai baht

49,244

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6436

MXN

Mexican peso

19,2419

INR

Indian rupee

70,1140

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Ronald J. Buschur, Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 6, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ RONALD J. BUSCHUR                
|                    |  |     |  | Ronald J. Buschur                    
|                    |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Harmony Gold Mining Company Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosing controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluations; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially
affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    
    /s/ Graham BriggsGraham BriggsChief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RODELIN DEMPAIRE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cv96-SPM/GRJ

STEVEN DAVIS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court on its own motion. On April 23, 2012,

Plaintiff Rodelin Dempaire’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw from

representation (doc. 133). As the basis for this motion, counsel indicated that

she has been unable to locate Plaintiff and could therefore not proceed with

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants. On May 10, 2012, the Court granted that

motion (doc. 140). The Order directed Plaintiff to file a notice of appearance by

his new lawyer, request additional time to find a new lawyer, or indicate that he

will proceed pro se by May 23, 2012. The clerk sent a copy of the Order to

Plaintiff at his last known address, but it was returned as undeliverable and

unable to forward (doc. 148). In addition to Plaintiff’s failure to contact his lawyer

or provide the Court with an updated address, he has also failed to file a

Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 154 Filed 05/30/12 Page 1 of 2
response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to H-2A Workers and

Incorporated Memorandum of Law (doc. 135). It is clear that Plaintiff’s actions

constitute an abandonment of his case and a failure to prosecute. Pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), a case can be dismissed for a plaintiff’s

failure to prosecute. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the claims brought by Rodelin Dempaire

are dismissed without prejudice due to his abandonment of the case and

failure to prosecute.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of May, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

2

Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 154 Filed 05/30/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOSEPH E. HICKS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv529-RH/WCS

SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_______________________________________/

ORDER FOR TRANSFER

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 6. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida. The clerk must take all steps necessary to effect the transfer.

SO ORDERED on April 13, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cr-39-RS-GRJ

MARTIN RAMIREZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 

363) and Defendant’s Objections (Doc. 367). I have reviewed Defendant’s 

objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. The Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 344) is GRANTED. 

3. The Motion to Vacate (Doc. 333) is DENIED.

4. The certificate of appealability is DENIED.

5. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on January 14, 2013.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Matches, Inc.   (the "Company") on Form  10-Q for the  period  ending  September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof  (the "Report"),  I, Chen Jinle, Chief Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





June 28, 2011

/s/ Chen Jinle

Chen Jinle

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)



|Date
|----
|
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION AND

GULF RESTORATION NETWORK, INC.,

Plaintiffs,

v. 4:10cv293-WS

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL

PROTECTION AGENCY,

Defendant.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the plaintiffs' motion to dismiss. Doc. 56. The case has been

settled, and the motion is unopposed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The plaintiffs' motion to dismiss (doc. 56) is GRANTED.

2. The plaintiffs' complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are dismissed with

prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of June , 2012.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:10-cv-00293-WS-CAS Document 57 Filed 06/26/12 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Rogue Wave Software, Inc:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-16749, 333-48485 and 333-48525) on Form S-8 of Rogue Wave Software,
Inc. of our report dated October 18, 2001, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2001
and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 2001, which report appears in the September 30, 2001 annual report
on Form 10-K, of Rogue Wave Software, Inc.

                                        KPMG LLP

Boulder, Colorado
November 29, 2001
<PAGE>
 
                                EXHIBIT 23.1

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
          Rogue Wave Software, Inc:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-16749, 333-48485 and 333-48525) on Form S-8 of Rogue Wave Software, Inc.
of our reports dated October 21, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1997
and 1998 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 1998, and the related schedule, which reports appear in the
September 30, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K, of Rogue Wave Software, Inc.
and subsidiaries.

                             KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Boulder, Colorado
December 9, 1998
Exhibit 13.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Daniel Johannes Pretorius, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
  the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Daniel Johannes PretoriusBy:
  Title:      Chief Executive OfficerDate:     October 31, 2016


Exhibit 13.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Adriaan Jacobus Davel, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:
  the Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Adriaan Jacobus DavelBy:
  Title:      Chief Financial OfficerDate:     October 31, 2016
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 5:10cr52-RH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cr52-RH

BOBBY GENE CLAGHORN,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER TERMINATING SUPERVISED RELEASE

The probation officer has submitted a memorandum recommending early 

termination of the defendant Bobby Gene Claghorn’s supervised release. The 

memorandum says the government does not oppose the request. 

I have considered the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and the criteria 

listed in Monograph 109 as approved by the Judicial Conference of the United 

States. I find that termination of supervised release at this time is warranted by the 

defendant’s conduct and the interest of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

Case 5:10-cr-00052-RS Document 34 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:10cr52-RH

Mr. Claghorn’s term of supervised release is terminated as of September 4, 

2015, at 8:54 a.m.

SO ORDERED on September 4, 2015.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cr-00052-RS Document 34 Filed 09/04/15 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

AVERY SOUFFRANT,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv448-RH/WCS

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER 

D. POPE, and CORRECTIONAL 

OFFICER J. BRADFORD,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed an

amended civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, doc . 8, and he simultaneously

submitted two service copies. Plaintiff's amended complaint has been reviewed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The amended complaint is deemed sufficient to state a

claim against the two correctional officers named as Defendants, both of whom were

employed at Hamilton Correctional Institution in Jasper, Florida, at the time of the

events at issue. Doc. 8. Plaintiff is currently housed in Everglades Correctional

Institution. Id. Erroneously, it was previously believed that venue existed here, see
Page 2 of 2

doc. 6, but Hamilton Correctional Institution is in the Middle District of Florida. 

Therefore, this case must be transferred to the Jacksonville Division of the Middle

District for further proceedings.

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's

amended complaint, doc. 8, be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for

the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, for further proceedings pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1406.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on December 16, 2010.

 S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv448-RH/WCS
EXHIBIT 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard R. Walters, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  Date: November 14, 2006    By   /s/ Richard R. Walters Richard R. Walters, President                        1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DALE A. COPEMANN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10cv228-SPM/GRJ

CITIFINANCIAL BANK, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge’s report

and recommendation (doc. 7) dated December 1, 2010. Plaintiff was furnished a

copy and has filed objections (docs. 8 and 10) and additional documents to

support his request to proceed in forma pauperis (docs. 9 and 11). Pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I find that the report and

recommendation should be adopted. 

Although Plaintiff may in fact be unable to pay the filing fee for this case,

Plaintiff must also show that his case is not frivolous or malicious in order to

proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). As explained in the

report and recommendation, Plaintiff’s § 1983 claim is frivolous because he does
Page 2 of 2

not demonstrate that the defendants were acting under color of state law and

Plaintiff only alleges his rights were violated under state law (Fla. Stat. §

501.005), not federal law. Accordingly it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The report and recommendation (doc. 7) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed for failure to state a claim for relief.

3. The motions to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of 

counsel (docs. 2 and 3) are denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of December, 2010. 

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO. 1:10cv228-SPM/GRJ