UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

INVESTORSHUB.COM, INC.,

a Florida corporation, 

MATTHEW BROWN,

an individual, and 

ROBERT ZUMBRUNNEN,

an individual,

VS CASE NO. 4:11cv9-RH/WCS

MINA MAR GROUP, INC.,

a foreign corporation,

MINA MAR GROUP INC. (OF THE USA),

n/k/a, EMRY CAPITAL GROUP, INC.,

a foreign corporation, and 

MIRO ZECEVIC, an individual 

INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires a “just, speedy, and inexpensive

determination of every action.” To accomplish that purpose, and in accordance with Rule 16(b)

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is ORDERED as follows:

(1) Discovery Period. The parties are directed to conduct discovery so that the due

date of any discovery requested shall not be later than May 30, 2011. The conduct of any

discovery which would require a later due date shall be permitted only on order of the Court. No

extension of time will be granted except for good cause and upon showing of diligence during

the initial discovery period [See N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 6.1]. The filing of motions SHALL NOT

operate to toll or extend the discovery cut-off date set forth in this paragraph.

(2) Rule 26 Requirements. This scheduling order is entered prior to the conference

of parties and the filing of the joint report required under Rule 26, Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, so that discovery may proceed expeditiously and without unnecessary delay. 

Modifications may be made to this order upon consideration of the parties’ joint report. The

following will be required of all parties to this litigation:

(a) Conference of Parties and Filing of Joint Report. Counsel of record

and any unrepresented parties shall confer (personally, by phone, or electronically) within 30

days from the date of this order, as required by Rule 26(f), and the joint report to the Court [see

Form 52] shall be filed within 14 days thereafter. The plaintiff shall initiate arrangements for the

conference and filing of the report, but the Court shall hold all parties equally responsible for

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 02/01/11 Page 1 of 10
Initial Scheduling Order - 4:11cv9-RH/WCS Page 2 of 8

insuring that the conference is held and the report filed as required. If the parties are unable to

agree, each party’s position shall be set out in the filed joint report. In addition to the matters

set out in Rule 26(f), the following shall also be discussed at the conference and specifically

addressed in the joint report:

(i) The matter of magistrate judge jurisdiction over the case. In

accordance with Rule 73.1(A) of the Local Rules, the parties are directed to confer regarding

their willingness to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, and the Joint Report should reflect

this discussion. However, the Joint Report should state only that the parties have conferred

regarding this issue. The parties may withhold consent if they so choose. Under no

circumstances should the parties indicate their respective positions on the matter of consent in

the Joint Report.

If all parties, after conferring with one another, elect to consent to

magistrate judge jurisdiction, the attached form of consent should be signed by all parties and

filed in the clerk’s office. It shall be plaintiff’s responsibility to forward the form to defendant(s),

who, in turn, shall have the responsibility of filing the document. The form should be filed only if

all parties have consented and signed the form. If any party elects not to consent, the form

should not be returned.

(ii) The nature and basis of all claims and defenses, and a good faith

attempt to identify the principal factual and legal issues in dispute.

(iii) The possibility for prompt settlement or resolution of the case, and

whether mediation (or any other alternative dispute resolution process) might be helpful in

settlement, either now or after certain limited discovery has taken place.

(iv) Proposed timetables and cutoff dates for the joinder of other

parties, amendments to the pleadings, and the filing of motions and responses, and in

particular, whether this initial scheduling order should be revised or amended in any way.

(v) The parties’ respective discovery requirements in this case, and if

the parties deem this initial scheduling order to be inadequate, they shall develop an alternate

proposal which specifically addresses the timing and form of discovery, whether discovery

should be conducted in phases or limited in any respect, and what, if any, changes should be

made in the discovery procedures and time deadlines set out in this initial scheduling order, or

in the applicable rules.

(vi) Whether any party will likely request or produce information from

electronic or computer-based media. If so:

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 02/01/11 Page 2 of 10
Initial Scheduling Order - 4:11cv9-RH/WCS Page 3 of 8

1. whether disclosure or production will be limited to data

reasonably available to the parties in the ordinary course of business [absent a showing of good

cause, the Court will not require the production of back-up or historic legacy data, nor will it

require the production of data that is not reasonably available in the ordinary course of business

in reasonably usable form];

2. if data beyond what is reasonably available to the parties

in the ordinary course of business is to be sought, the anticipated scope, cost and time required

for its disclosure or production, and who will bear the cost;

3. the format and media agreed to by the parties for the

production of any electronic or computer-based data, as well as agreed procedures for such

production;

4. whether reasonable measures have been taken to

preserve potentially discoverable data from alteration or destruction in the ordinary course of

business or otherwise;

5. procedures to deal with inadvertent production of

privileged information; and

6. other problems which the parties anticipate may arise in

connection with electronic or computer-based discovery.

(vii) A good faith estimate as to when the parties believe the case will

be ready for trial (month and year). This date will be set out in the joint report, and if it is not

within 8 months from the date of filing of this case, an explanation must be included.

(viii) Any other matters which the parties deem appropriate with regard

to specific aspects or the uniqueness of this case, and including any applicable subject within

Rule 16(c).

(ix) The parties are directed to inform the Court in their joint report if it

appears that this case should be made subject to the Manual for Complex Litigation.

(b) Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures. The disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1)

shall be provided (unless otherwise stipulated), without awaiting a discovery request, to all other

parties within 14 days from the date of the parties’ conference required under Rule 26(f).

(c) Rule 26(a)(2) Disclosures. Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures of expert

witnesses and their opinions shall be made by the plaintiff within 60 days from the date of this

scheduling order, and by the defendant or defendants within 30 days thereafter. Third parties

or parties added or joined later shall disclose their experts under Rule 26(a)(2) within 60 days

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 02/01/11 Page 3 of 10
Initial Scheduling Order - 4:11cv9-RH/WCS Page 4 of 8

after appearance in this case, or within 30 days after the disclosure by the opposing party,

whichever is the longer period. Expert witnesses not timely disclosed as required by Rule

26(a)(2), or whose opinions have been significantly modified or changed after discovery has

ended, will normally not be permitted to testify at trial.

(d) Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures. The Rule 26(a)(3) disclosures are not

required at this time. The Court will enter an order after the completion of discovery which will

set a pretrial conference and will specify the parties’ comprehensive trial disclosure and

preparation requirements.

(3) Additional Court Action or Scheduling Conference. The Court will promptly

consider the parties’ filed joint report, and will take one of the following courses of action within

14 days thereafter:

(a) Enter a final scheduling order by modifying this initial scheduling order as

the presiding judge deems appropriate in light of the parties’ joint report, or by adopting the

parties’ report, or by confirming the requirements of this order.

(b) Set the matter for a Rule 16 scheduling conference, either for the

attorneys’ (and any unrepresented parties’) personal attendance, or to be conducted by

telephone. A final scheduling order will be entered thereafter.

(c) If the Court takes no action within 14 days from the filing of the joint

report, this initial scheduling order will continue in full force and effect until some further order of

this Court.

(d) If any party so requests by motion, a scheduling conference or

preliminary pre-trial conference may be held to address any of the matters set out in Rule 16(a),

(b), and (c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(4) Interrogatories. The number of interrogatories shall be governed by Rule 33(a),

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(5) Schedule of Pre-Trial Matters. In accordance with Rule 16(b), Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, the following schedule shall apply to this case, unless excluded by Local Rule

16.1, or unless any party shall file an objection or request for a different schedule within 44

days from the date of this order, viz:

(a) Joinder of other parties and amendments of pleadings shall be

accomplished by the service and filing of the appropriate motions or pleadings within the time

required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of this Court, except as

noted below.

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 02/01/11 Page 4 of 10
Initial Scheduling Order - 4:11cv9-RH/WCS Page 5 of 8

(b) All motions and responses shall be served and filed within the time

required by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules of this Court.

(c) Motions for summary judgment shall be filed as promptly as possible, but,

unless otherwise permitted by court order, not later than 20 days after the close of discovery.

(d) Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, no motions to compel discovery

may be filed after the close of discovery.

(e) Motions filed may be disposed of without hearing [See N.D. Fla. Loc. R.

7.1].

(f) If the rules and this order do not provide a time for the filing or service of

motions or pleadings, then such motions or pleadings shall be served and filed within the period

provided for the completion of discovery.

(6) Attorneys’ Discovery Obligations. The Rules of Civil Procedure set out explicit

time limits for responses to discovery requests. If an attorney cannot respond on time, this fact

should be communicated by the most expeditious means to opposing counsel; and if consent to

an extension of time cannot be obtained, a motion requesting the same should be immediately

filed and served. In the meantime, no motion to compel a response shall be filed. Stipulations

extending the time for responses to discovery may be made only as authorized by Rule 29,

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Local Rule 6.1.

(7) Rule 37 Awards of Motion Expenses. The Court will ordinarily award counsel

fees for time spent in filing (and arguing) a motion to compel if such a motion is necessary to

make the recalcitrant party respond, or for time spent in opposing (and arguing) such a motion

that is found to be unnecessary or without basis. Certification of all discovery requests,

responses, and objections is required under Rule 26(g), and violations thereof will be subject to

sanctions.

(8) Resolution of Discovery Controversies. Counsel should attempt to resolve

discovery controversies without the Court’s intervention. The Court will entertain a motion with

respect to matters which remain in controversy only if, after consultation and sincere attempts to

resolve differences, counsel are unable to reach an accord. Any motion filed shall include

certification that such attempts have been made, in accordance with Rule 7(B) and Rule 37,

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and shall be in the form required by Local Rule 26.2(D).

Counsel’s attention is also directed to the supplementation requirements of Rule 26(e) and their

obligations under Rule 26(g), as well as counsel’s potential liability for excessive costs under

Title 28, United States Code, Section 1927.

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 02/01/11 Page 5 of 10
Initial Scheduling Order - 4:11cv9-RH/WCS Page 6 of 8

(9) Attorney’s Fee Records. If attorney’s fees are awarded, the lodestar will be

determined based only on hours for which contemporaneous time records—in the form required

by Local Rule 54.1—were made and retained. But the records must not be filed with the clerk

until necessary in connection with a motion to award fees; the Local Rule 54.1 requirement to

file the records with the clerk each month will not apply in this case. An attorney must disclose

to another party on request the total number of hours devoted to the case for any month by

attorneys and other time keepers. 

(10) Summary Judgment. Local Rule 56.1, which addresses summary-judgment

procedures, will not apply in this case. The following procedures will apply instead:

(a) A party who moves for summary judgment must file at the same time a memorandum

of up to 25 pages and any supporting evidence not already in the record. The memorandum

must include a statement of facts generally in the form that would be appropriate in an appellate

brief—not a statement of undisputed facts in the form specified in Local Rule 56.1. A statement

of facts must not be set out in a separate document.

(b) An opposing party must file within 21 days—without a three-day extension based on

the manner in which the motion is served—a memorandum of up to 25 pages and any opposing

evidence not already in the record. The opposing party must not file a separate document

responding to the moving party’s statement of facts.

(c) The moving party may file a reply memorandum of up to 10 pages. The deadline for

a reply memorandum is the earlier of (a) seven days after the opposing memorandum is

filed—without a three-day extension based on the manner in which the opposing memorandum

is served—or (b) two days before the pretrial conference. 

(d) Each memorandum must include pinpoint citations to the record evidence supporting

each factual assertion. 

(e) The page limit for a memorandum may be increased by an agreement of the parties

or on a motion showing good cause, but the parties should take note: a longer memorandum is

usually less persuasive, not more.

(f) A motion may be resolved against a party without a hearing at any time after the party

has had an opportunity to file a memorandum and materials under this paragraph. If a motion

has not been resolved and a party has filed a separate request for a hearing, the clerk must set

a hearing. The hearing must be set for an available date at least two days after the due date for

the reply memorandum. The hearing will be conducted by telephone if, at least two days before

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 02/01/11 Page 6 of 10
Initial Scheduling Order - 4:11cv9-RH/WCS Page 7 of 8

the hearing, a party so requests. The hearing may be combined with the pretrial conference if

doing so will not delay the hearing by more than two weeks. 

(11) Non-Filing of Rule 26 Disclosures and Discovery Materials. In accordance

with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(d), the parties shall serve but shall not file with the

clerk copies of disclosures under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) and 26(a)(2) or

discovery materials (including notices of deposition, deposition transcripts, interrogatories,

responses to interrogatories, production requests, responses to production requests,

admissions requests, or responses to admissions requests), unless and until needed for

consideration of pending motions by the court. The parties need not serve and shall not file

with the clerk separate notices of serving interrogatories or interrogatory responses, notices of

serving production requests or responses, or notices of serving admissions requests or

responses.

(12) Electronic Filing. Each party represented by an attorney is required to file

documents electronically, not in paper form, with limited exceptions. Compliance with this

requirement is mandatory. Paper filings are a burden on the clerk of the court, delay the

transmission of the documents to the judge, and waste the judge’s time. The clerk is directed to

report to the judge for appropriate action any paper filings in this matter that occur more than 14

days after the date of this order.

(13) Disclosure Statement. Each nongovernmental corporate party must file a

statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation that owns

10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. The deadline for filing the

statement is set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1, and, if not filed sooner, the statement must in any

event be filed within 14 days of the date of this order. A supplemental statement must be filed

upon any change in the information that the statement requires.

(14) Amendments. This order may be amended by the Court on its own motion or

upon motion of any party.

DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of February, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 02/01/11 Page 7 of 10
FLN Form 85 (rev. 8/98) Notice, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

INVESTORSHUB.COM, INC.,

a Florida corporation, 

MATTHEW BROWN,

an individual, and 

ROBERT ZUMBRUNNEN,

an individual,

VS CASE NO. 4:11cv9-RH/WCS

MINA MAR GROUP, INC.,

a foreign corporation,

MINA MAR GROUP INC. (OF THE USA),

n/k/a, EMRY CAPITAL GROUP, INC.,

a foreign corporation, and 

MIRO ZECEVIC, an individual 

NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

TO EXERCISE JURISDICTION

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c), and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, you are notified that

a United States magistrate judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this

case including a jury or nonjury trial, and to order the entry of a final judgment. Exercise of this jurisdiction

by a magistrate judge is, however, permitted only if all parties voluntarily consent.

You may, without adverse substantive consequences, withhold your consent, but this will prevent

the court’s jurisdiction from being exercised by a magistrate judge. If any party withholds consent, the

identity of the parties consenting or withholding consent will not be communicated to any magistrate judge

or to the district judge to whom the case has been assigned.

An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge shall be taken directly to the United

States court of appeals for this judicial circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of

this district court.

CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

In accordance with provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, the parties in this case

consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct any and all proceedings in this case, including

the trial, order the entry of a final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings.

Party Represented Signatures Date

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 02/01/11 Page 8 of 10
FLN Form 85 (rev. 8/98) Notice, Consent, and Order of Reference - Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER OF REFERENCE

IT IS ORDERED that this case be referred to ,

United States Magistrate Judge, to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of judgment in accordance

with 28 U.S.C. §636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. 73, and the foregoing consent of the parties.

Date United States District Judge

NOTE: RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT ONLY IF ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED ON

THIS FORM TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 02/01/11 Page 9 of 10
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO DISPOSITION OF

CIVIL CASE BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1), full-time magistrate judges are authorized to exercise civil

jurisdiction, including trial of the case and entry of final judgment, upon consent of the parties. Due to the

district courts’ heavy trial schedules, such consent to magistrate jurisdiction often results in more

expeditious resolution of cases. The parties are, of course, entirely free to withhold such consent without

any adverse consequences.

In all civil cases, other than prisoner litigation and social security appeals, the parties shall be

required pursuant to the Initial Scheduling Order to confer regarding the matter of magistrate judge

jurisdiction. However, the Joint Report should state only that the parties have conferred regarding this

issue. Under no circumstances should the parties indicate their respective positions on the matter

of consent in the Joint Report.

Should all parties, after conferring with one another, elect to consent to magistrate judge

jurisdiction, the attached form of consent should be signed by all parties and returned to the court. It shall

be plaintiff’s responsibility to forward the form to defendant(s), who, in turn, shall have the responsibility of

filing the document with the court through the clerk’s office. The form should be returned to the court only

if all parties have consented and signed the form. Should any party elect not to consent, the form

should not be returned.

In prisoner litigation and social security appeals, and any other case in which an Initial Scheduling

Order is not entered, the clerk shall, after the first responsive pleading is filed, send a consent form to the

plaintiff. If the plaintiff elects to consent, plaintiff shall sign the form and promptly send it to defendant(s). If

defendant(s) also consents and signs the form, defendant(s) shall promptly return the form to the court. 

Should any party elect not to consent, the form should not be returned.

A party’s decision to consent, or not to consent, to the disposition of the case before a United

States Magistrate Judge is entirely voluntary, and no judge of this court will be informed of a party’s

decision to withhold consent. By returning the consent form only in cases where all parties consent, the

court will not be aware of which party withheld consent. Where the consent form is not returned to the

court during the early stages of the case, either the district court judge or magistrate judge may again

advise the parties of the availability of the magistrate judge, but in doing so, shall also advise the parties

that they are free to withhold consent without adverse consequences.

Please note that in the event of consent, the parties may appeal a final judgment from the

magistrate directly to the court of appeals in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of

the district court.

Case 4:11-cv-00009-RH-WCS Document 5 Filed 02/01/11 Page 10 of 10