alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13

- 18

- 00 244

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellant,

v.

SHEILA JO HARDIN

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 3 19 th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.



## O R D E R

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the State’s motion to direct the trial court clerk

to forward to this Court original exhibit SX #1, a video recording of a traffic stop, admitted

at the hearing on motion to suppress in Cause No. 17FC

- 1760

- G

.

The Court, having fully examined and consider ed the State’s motion to direct the

trial court clerk to forward original exhibit, is of the opinion that the motion should be2

granted. The State’s motion is hereby GRANTED. The clerk of the trial court is hereby

ORDERED to forward original exhibit SX #1 entered into evidence at the hearing on

motion to suppress in Cause No. 17FC

- 1760

- G to this Court within fifteen days from the

date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed this the

16th day of July

, 20 18

.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CAROLYN STROMAS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv381/LAC/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of the 

Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated March 28, 2011 (Doc. 11). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s Motion to Remand (Doc. 10) is GRANTED and the Commissioner’s

decision denying benefits is REVERSED.

3. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

4. Defendant is ordered to conduct proceedings in accordance with the Report and

Recommendation (Doc. 11).

5. The clerk is directed to enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure

Case 3:10-cv-00381-LC-EMT Document 12 Filed 05/03/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

6. The clerk is directed to administratively close this file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 3 day of May, 2011. rd

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv381/LAC/EMT

Case 3:10-cv-00381-LC-EMT Document 12 Filed 05/03/11 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5285 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5285

 To condition eligibility for a Federal license to deal in firearms on 
the passage of an online behavioral awareness training course, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2018

 Mr. Mast (for himself and Mr. Thomas J. Rooney of Florida) introduced 
    the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To condition eligibility for a Federal license to deal in firearms on 
the passage of an online behavioral awareness training course, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Behavioral Awareness Training Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR A FEDERAL LICENSE TO DEAL IN FIREARMS 
              CONDITIONED ON PASSAGE OF A BEHAVIORAL AWARENESS TRAINING 
              COURSE.

    (a) In General.--Section 923(d) of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph 
                (F);
                    (B) by striking the period at the end of 
                subparagraph (G) and inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(H) in the case of an application to be licensed as a 
        dealer, the applicant has successfully completed the course of 
        study developed under paragraph (3).''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(3) The Attorney General shall, directly or by contract, develop 
(using best practices and science) a course of study that--
            ``(A) uses behavioral analysis training materials to help 
        applicants for a license to deal in firearms identify 
        suspicious behavior by potential firearms purchasers; and
            ``(B) is accessible and may be completed, through the 
        Internet website of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, 
        and Explosives.''.
    (b) Limitation on Liability.--Section 923 of such title is amended 
by adding at the end the following:
    ``(m) A licensed dealer shall not be liable in an action at law for 
damages predicated on having completed the course of study developed 
under subsection (a)(3).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a)(1) and 
(b) of this section shall take effect on the date that is 1 year after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Thi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

The pane l unani m ous l y f i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed . R . A p p . P . 3 4 (a) (2). N ED / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CA T I ON

UN I TE D STATE S COURT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E N IN T H C IR C U IT R UD YA NT O, P et i t i o n er, v. E R IC H . H O L D E R J r., A tto rn e y G e n e ra l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 06- 75403 A ge nc y N o. A 096- 361- 809 M E M OR AN DU M *

O n Pet i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ard o f I m m ig ra tio n A p p e a ls Subm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B efore: A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , an dT A S H IM A , C i rcuitJu d g es. R udya nt o, ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d o f I m m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ ( “B I A ”) orderdi sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r om an im m ig ra tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is ap p lic a tio n fo r w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l. 

# FI L ED NOV 30 2009 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U . S. C O U R T O F AP PE ALSN ED / R es ear ch 06- 75403 2 W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew f or s ub st ant i alevi dence a d v e r s e c r e d ib il ity d e te rm in a ti o n s , Ch e b c h o u b v . I NS , 2 5 7 F .3 d1 0 3 8 , 1 0 4 2 (9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) , an dr e v ie w d e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s , Co lme n a rv . I NS , 210 F. 3d 9 6 7 , 9 7 1 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 0 ) . W e d e n y th e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. Subst ant i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the B I A ’ s a dve r s e c r e di bi l i ty de t e rm i na t i on be c aus e R udya nt o’ s t e s t i m ony w a s i nc ons i s t e ntw i th hi s de c l ar a t i on c onc e rni ng the y ear of th e seco n datt ack , an dth e l o cat i o n w h ere he reg ai n edco n sci o u sn ess f o ll o w in g th is a tt a c k . Se e Che bc houb , 257 F. 3d a t1043 ( 9th C i r . 2001) ( i nc ons i s t e nc i e s i n the de t a i l s of e ve nt s tha tf

orm the ba s i s f

orthe a s yl um c l a i m go t o th e h earto f th e cl ai m an dsup p o rtan ad v erse credibil i ty fi n d i n g ). W e r e j e c tR udya nt o’ s due pr oc e s s c ont e nt i on tha the w a s nota f f or de d w i th a com pet enti nt erpre t eratthe m er i t s hear i ng because he has f ai l ed t o sho w “a bett er tr ansl at i on w ou l d h ave m ade adi f f er ence i n the ou t com e of the hear i ng . ” Kotasz v . I NS , 3 1 F . 3 d8 4 7 , 8 5 0 n . 2 (9th C i r. 1 9 9 4 ). P E T I T I ON F OR R E VI E W DE NI E D.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DAVID KATZ,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv274/RS-MD

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE

COMPANY, as Receiver for PEOPLE’S

FIRST COMMUNITY BANK,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Mediator’s Report (Doc. 23) and Plaintiff’s Report Regarding

Mediation (Doc. 24). Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2(D), it is ordered:

1. This case is dismissed from the active docket of the court.

2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this Order, to

amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative

purposes, and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is directed to

close the case in its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on May 23, 2011. 

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00274-RS-CJK Document 25 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 9 Filed 06/19/01 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 9 Filed 06/19/01 Page 2 of 2
DIOGU DIOGU LAW FIRM 

P. O. Box 994, Fulshear, Texas 77441 

Email: diogu.diogu.law.firm@gmail.com · Fax: 832-408-7611· Direct:(713)-791-3225

August 14th, 2015 

The Clerk of the Court

Christopher Prine, Clerk

14th Court of Appeals

Houston, Texas

14-15-00169-CV, TC #13-DCV-203712, Diogu Kalu Diogu II v. Linebarger Goggan Blair & 

Sampson, Fort Bend County Tax Assessor Collector, and Fort Bend Appraisal District

ARRANGEMENT TO PAY FOR BOTH THE CLERK’S RECORD A

ND THE COURT REPORTER’S TRANSCRIPT

Dear Honorable Clerk of the said Court:

Please note that the Appellant is making an arrangement to pay for both the Clerk’s record 

and the Court Reporter’s Transcript for the above matter.

Thanks again for your professional Courtesy on this matter.

Respectfully: 

/S/ Diogu Kalu Diogu II, LL.M. 

Attorney at Law 

Bar No. 24000340 

Phone (713) 791 3225 

Fax (832) 408 7611 

Enclosures: 

Designation of Clerk’s record on Appeal/Request for Court Reporter’s Transcript

ACCEPTED

14-15-00169-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

8/14/2015 4:03:40 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/14/2015 4:03:40 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GEORGE L. JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv295-SPM/WCS

WALTER McNEIL,

 

Respondent.

__________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 12) dated October 6, 2010. Petitioner 

has filed objections (doc. 18) pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). Despite the objections, I have determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted. 

As explained in the report and recommendation, the petition is untimely

even if based on newly discovered evidence because the evidence was

discovered in November of 2008 and Petitioner did not file this petition until more

than one year afterward. Petitioner has not demonstrated from the newly

discovered evidence (see doc. 1, ex. N) that he is actually innocent.
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 12) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The 2254 petition (doc. 1) is summarily dismissed as untimely. 

3.. No certificate of appealability will be issued because Petitioner has

failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of January, 2011.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 4:09cv507-SPM/WCS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DAVID K. SKELLIE,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv465/LAC/EMT

R. TIFFT, WARDEN, et al.,

Defendants. 

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On November 16, 2010,

this court entered an order giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to either pay the filing fee of

$350.00 or submit a fully completed application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 8). Plaintiff

failed to respond to the order; therefore, on December 21, 2010, the court issued an order requiring

Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty-one (21) days, why this action should not be dismissed for

failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc. 11). The time for compliance with the show cause

order has now elapsed with no response from Plaintiff.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Petitioner’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 14th day of January 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:10cv465/LAC/EMT
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Richland Resources
Corp. ("Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Dated:  September 14, 2012





|By: | /s/ Max Elghandour     
|--- | -----------------------
|    | Max Elghandour         
|    | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grant Hartford Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we, Eric Sauve, President/Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer of the Company, and
David Gilmer, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 17, 2010



/s/Eric SauveEric SauvePresident/Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Office

Dated: May 17, 2010



/s/David GilmerDavid GilmerSecretary/Treasurer
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A1 15 3 . CI TY OF ATLANTA v . KELVI N LAMAR.

In t h i s p ers o n al i n

ju ry act i o n , Kel v i n Lam ar su ed t h e Ci ty o f At l an ta t o reco v er

d am ag es h e s us t ai n ed i n a rear-en d au t o m o b il e co ll i s i o n wi t h a Ci t y o f At l an t a p o l i ce

o ffi cer. Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e Ci t y of At l an t a’ s m o ti o n fo r s u m m ary ju d g m en t

, fi nd i ng t h at g en ui n e i s s u es o f fact rem ai ned as to t h e o ffi cer’ s n eg l i g en ce. T h e Ci t y

fi led a n o t i ce o f ap p eal fro m t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er. W e, h owev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Th e d en i al of a m o t io n fo r s u m m ary ju dg m en t m

u s t b e ap p eal ed i n acco rd an ce

wi t h th e i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal p ro ced u res s et fo rt h i n OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b )

— i n cl u d i n g

o b t ai n i n g a cert i fi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew fro m t h e t ri al co u rt

. See Geo r g i a Cen t r al

Cr ed i t Un i o n v. C o l e , 2 39 Ga. 8 7 0

, 8 7 0 -8 7 1 (2 3 9 SE2 d 3 7) (1 97 7 ); S h a r p e’s

Ap p li a n ce S t o r e, In c. v. An d er s o n , 1 6 1 Ga. Ap p

. 1 1 2 (2 8 9 SE2 d 3 1 2 ) ( 1 9 8 2 );

Lu mb er men ’s Un d

er wr i t i n g Al l i a n ce v. A t l a n t i c W o o d In d u s

. , 2 0 7 Ga. Ap p

. 3 9 2

, 3 9 2
(4 2 7 SE2 d 8 6 1 ) (1 99 3 ). Th e Ci t y ’ s fai l u re t o fo l l o w t he req u i red ap p el l at e p ro ced u res

d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s di ct i o n o v er t h i s ap p eal

, wh ich i s h ereb y DISM ISSED. See Pa ce

Co n s t r

. Co r

p

. v. No r t h

pa r k As s o cs

. , 2 1 5 Ga. Ap p

. 43 8

, 4 3 9 (4 5 0 SE2 d 8 2 8 ) (1 9 9 4 ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. April 23, 2021

04/23/2021
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63898]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5651]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

Date and Time: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 at 10:00 a.m.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items to be Discussed: Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Final Rules on Electioneering Communications.
    Management and Administrative Matters.

Person to Contact for Information: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-5651 Filed 11-8-07; 3:19 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

GARRY LEE TAYLOR,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv292/MCR/EMT

BEN TIFF, Warden, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated August 26, 2010. (Doc. 4). Petitioner has been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DISMISSED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 493

_____________________________
V LADISLAV B UDNIK , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Russell Healey , Judge

. January 30, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OBERTS , W ETHERELL , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender , Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General , Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Randy M. Griffin,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
the Quarterly Report of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2011 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Mesa
Energy Holdings, Inc.



|                  | By:    | /s/ RANDY M. GRIFFIN       
|----------------- | ------ | ---------------------------
|Date: May 3, 2012 | Name:  | Randy M. Griffin           
|                  | Title: | Principal Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Guanwei Recycling Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Chen
Min, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:





1. The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and;





2. The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated:
      November 15, 2010/s/
      Chen MinChen
      MinChief
      Executive Officer