IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-88,609-04, 88,609-05 & 88,609-06

EX PARTE JEREMY PAUL CASTILLO, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 37297CR/B, 37298CR/B & 41522CR/B IN THE 40TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM ELLIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of two counts of assault and one count of aggravated assault and

sentenced to five years’ imprisonment in each count. He did not appeal his convictions. Applicant

filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk

forwarded them to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that guilty-plea counsel was ineffective because he

advised Applicant to plead guilty without investigating his cases. He also contends that in cause

number 37298CR/B, his aggravated assault case, he is actually innocent and the complainant’s

statement to the police was false. 

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,
2

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Elizondo, 947 S.W.2d 202 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Ex parte

Weinstein, 421 S.W.3d 656 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Accordingly, the record should be developed. 1

The trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, §

3(d). The trial court shall order guilty-plea counsel to respond to Applicant’s ineffective assistance

of counsel claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means set out in Article

11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is

indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint

counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is

appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall first make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether guiltyplea counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for his

alleged deficient performance. The trial court shall then make findings and conclusions as to

whether in his aggravated assault case (1) Applicant has presented newly available or discovered

evidence showing that he is actually innocent; (2) he has shown by clear and convincing evidence

that no reasonable juror would have convicted him in light of the evidence; and (3) the complainant

made a material false statement. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that

it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

 The trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we 1

dismiss these applications under Article 11.07, § 4 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Applicant’s previous applications were dismissed, so there has not been a “final disposition” in

his cases. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 4(a) (“If a subsequent application for writ of

habeas corpus is filed after final disposition of an initial application challenging the same

conviction . . . .”). 
3

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: December 18, 2019

Do not publish