alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72436-72437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6110]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice Before Waiver With Respect to land at Raleigh County 
Memorial Airport, Beckley, WV

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is publishing notice of proposed release of 16.10 
acres of land at the Raleigh County Memorial Airport, Beckley, West 
Virginia to the Raleigh County Airport Authority and the Raleigh County 
Commission for the development of an industrial park. There are no 
impacts to the Airport and the land is not needed for airport 
development as shown on the Airport Layout Plan. Fair Market Value of 
the land will be paid to the Raleigh County Airport and the Raleigh 
County Commission, and used for Airport purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 22, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Connie Boley-Lilly, 
Program Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, Beckley Airports 
District Office, 176 Airport Circle, Room 101, Beaver, West Virginia 
25813.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Thomas Cochran, Airport Manager, Raleigh County 
Memorial Airport at the following address: Thomas Cochran, Airport 
Manager, Raleigh County Memorial Airport, 176 Airport Circle, Room 105, 
Beaver, West Virginia 25813.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Connie Boley-Lilly, Program 
Specialist, Beckley Airport District Office, (304) 252-6216 ext. 125, 
Fax (304) 253-8028.

[[Page 72437]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 5, 2000, new authorizing 
legislation became effective. That bill, the Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century, Public Law 10-181 
(April 5, 2000; 114 Stat. 61) (AIR 21) requires that a 30 day public 
notice must be provided before the Secretary may waive any condition 
imposed on an interest in surplus property.

    Issued in Beckley, West Virginia on December 7, 2007.
Matthew P. DiGiulian,
Acting Manager, Beckley Airport District Office, Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 07-6110 Filed 12-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restricti ons on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 GERALD WYNN JANECKA, 2 Petitioner-Appellee, 3
v. NO. 33,822 4 ELIZABETH LOUISE JANECKA, 5 Respondent-Appellant. 6 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY 7 John F. Davis, District Judge 8 Law Office of Clifton L. Davidson, LLC 9 Clifton L. Davidson 10 Albuquerque, NM 11 for Appellee 12 L. Helen Bennett 13 Albuquerque, NM 14 for Appellant 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 WECHSLER, Judge. 172 {1} Respondent appeals from the district court’s order denying her Rule 1-060 1 NMRA motion for relief from judgment. OnMarch 2, 2015, this Court issued a 2 calendar notice proposing to affirm. Petitioner filed a memorandum in support of this 3 Court’s notice of proposed disposition. Respondent has not filed a memorandum in 4 opposition to this Court’s notice, and the time for doing so has now passed. “Failure 5 to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed 6 in the calendar notice.” Frick v. Veazey , 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 7 P.2d 287. This Court therefore affirms th e district court’s order for the reasons 8 provided in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition. 9 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 10

_______________ _________________ 11 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge 12 WE CONCUR: 13

________________________________ 14 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 15

________________________________ 16 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge 17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

EDWARD HOLIFIELD,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 4:11-CV-15-SPM/WCS

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File

Answer (doc. 3) and Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to the

Motion to Dismiss (doc. 6), it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motions (docs. 3, 6) are GRANTED.

2. The Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (doc. 5) is

accepted as timely filed.

3. Plaintiff shall have until March 4, 2011, to respond to the Motion to

Dismiss.

DONE AND ORDERED this first day of March, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 13.1CERTIFICATION*(pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)*In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 ofHarmony Gold Mining Company Limited (the “Company”) as filed with the U.S. Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Commission”) on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Graham Briggs,Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that:          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.December 7, 2007By: /s/ Graham Briggs
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6821

FRANCIS BROOKS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GERRI LEVISTER, Warden; S. HOLLEMBAEK, Warden; DERICK PHILIP, Medical Doctor; TERRY KILPATRICK; C. DUCHESNE, Medical Doctor; JANELLE WILLIAMS, Psychiatrist , Defendants

- Appellees , and ALEX SEDA, Medical Doctor; JOHN DOES 1

- 100 , Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. ( 5:16

- ct

- 03166

- BO )

Submitted : November 19, 2019 Decided: November 22, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Francis Brooks , Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Raleigh, North Carol ina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Francis Brooks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671

- 2680 (2012) , and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brooks v. United States , No. 5:16

- ct

- 03166

- BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2017, July 20, 2018 & May 30, 2019). We dispense with oral

ar gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
# C_2010317EN.01000201.xml

| 20.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 317/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 317/2

---

Taking of the oath by a new Member of the Court of Justice

2010/C 317/02

Following his appointment as Judge at the Court of Justice for the period from 7 October 2010 to 6 October 2012 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 29 September 2010, (1) Mr Jarašiūnas took the oath before the Court on 6 October 2010.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 261 of 5.10.2010, p. 5.

1

---
# C_2010220EN.01000102.xml

| 14.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5893 — Allianz/Corio/Porta di Roma)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 220/02

On 6 August 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5893. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5893. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of EXPLORE ANYWHERE HOLIDNG CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Gerlib, Interim CEO (Principal Executive Officer) and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: January 19, 2011
 
 
 By: /s/ William Gerib
 Name: William Gerlib
 Title: Interim CEO (Principal Executive Officer) and Director
# C_2011124EN.01000701.xml

| 27.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 124/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 April 2011

2011/C 124/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4584 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 119,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4573 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,8813 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8885 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2851 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7842 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,18 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 263,8 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9493 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0868 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2102 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3562 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3826 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3313 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,82 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8019 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 578,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8383 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,4708 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3588 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 584,5 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3861 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,912 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,7395 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,621 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2823 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,936 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,706 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4584

JPY

Japanese yen

119,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4573

GBP

Pound sterling

0,8813

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8885

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2851

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7842

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,18

HUF

Hungarian forint

263,8

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9493

RON

Romanian leu

4,0868

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2102

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3562

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3826

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3313

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,82

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8019

KRW

South Korean won

1 578,34

ZAR

South African rand

9,8383

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,4708

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3588

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 584,5

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3861

PHP

Philippine peso

62,912

RUB

Russian rouble

40,7395

THB

Thai baht

43,621

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2823

MXN

Mexican peso

16,936

INR

Indian rupee

64,706

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### STATE v. PRICE

No. 46.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 599.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 15 September 1972.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

TARONDA WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00505-MP -GRJ

TONY HALLERTON, WALKER,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 4, Report and Recommendation regarding the

Complaint, Doc. 1. The Magistrate Judge has recommended this case be transferred to the

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Gainesville Division. No party

has objected and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 4, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein. 

2. This case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern

District of Georgia, Gainesville Division. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of December, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Exhibit 23.1











Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-168834, 333-135076, 333-116930, 333-107525, 333-90045, 333-77943, 333-33038, 333-39396, 333-67692, and 333-145280) of Autobytel Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Autobytel Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2010.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP




Orange County, California


March 10, 2011
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PERSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of FOREVER VALUABLE COLLECTIBLES, INC. (the Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jodi K. Stevens, President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that, to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: May 10, 2012By:/s/ Jodi K. StevensJodi K. StevensPresident, Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Becky Corigliano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date: May 14, 2004



By   /s/ Becky Corigliano



Becky Corigliano

Chief Financial Officer





































16
Exhibit 31.2  Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer   I, Reid Stone, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Laufer Bridge Enterprises, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: August 19 2009  /s/ Reid Stone Reid Stone Title: Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 5:11cv68-RH/WCS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

EDDIE T. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:11cv68-RH/EMT

WARDEN PAIGE AUGUSTINE,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 13. No objections have been filed. Upon 

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is DISMISSED 

without prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on November 22, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:11-cv-00068-RH-EMT Document 15 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ORLANDO BETHEL and

GLYNIS BETHEL,

Plaintiffs,

vs. Case No.: 5:11cv72/RS/EMT

CITY OF PANAMA CITY, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiffs commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). By order of this court dated

March 24, 2011, Plaintiffs were given thirty (30) days in which to pay the filing fee or file complete

applications to proceed in forma pauperis (see Doc. 3). Plaintiffs failed to pay the filing fee or file

applications to proceed in forma pauperis; therefore, on May 3, 2011, the court issued an order

requiring Plaintiffs to show cause, within twenty-one (21) days, why this action should not be

dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc. 5). The time for compliance with

the show cause order has now elapsed, and Plaintiffs have failed to pay the filing fee or file

applications to proceed in forma pauperis.

 Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiffs’ failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 27th day of May 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:11-cv-00072-RS-EMT Document 6 Filed 05/27/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 5:11cv72/RS/EMT

Case 5:11-cv-00072-RS-EMT Document 6 Filed 05/27/11 Page 2 of 2