alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Dror Svorai, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of InfoSpi, Inc., hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InfoSpi, Inc. for quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Amended Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of InfoSpi, Inc.








DATE: February 9, 2011
By:
/s/Dror SvoraiName: Dror SvoraiTitle: Chief Executive Officer





By:
/s/Dror SvoraiName: Dror SvoraiTitle: Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to InfoSpi, Inc. and will be retained by InfoSpi, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010353EN.01000901.xml

| 28.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 353/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 353/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5961 — Bertrand Restauration/InBev France/Bars&Co)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 353/06

On 17 December 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5961. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5961. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2011164EN.01000901.xml

| 2.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6215 — Sun Capital/Polestar UK Print Limited)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 164/03

On 20 May 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6215. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6215. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EX-10.24



 Exhibit 10.24 

May 29, 2014 
 Richard Neely 

[address] 
 [address] 

Dear Rick: 
 I’d like to personally thank you for your
valuable contributions to date with The First Marblehead Corporation (“FMC”). You have been identified as a key employee whom FMC would like to reward and retain to help the business move forward with its strategic initiatives. Toward that
end, this letter (the “Retention Bonus Letter”) is to inform you that you have been deemed eligible to receive a one-time incentive Retention Bonus (as set forth below), subject to the terms herein. 

In particular, you are potentially eligible for a Retention Bonus in an amount equal to $25,000, less lawful deductions (the “Retention Bonus”). The
Retention Bonus will be paid on September 30, 2014 (the “Payment Date”) provided that you remain employed in “good standing” with FMC through the Payment Date and satisfactorily perform your job duties through the Payment
Date. 
 If your employment is involuntarily terminated without “cause” prior to the Payment Date, you will still be eligible for the Retention
Bonus. You will be ineligible for the Retention Bonus if you resign your employment or your employment is terminated for “cause” prior to the Payment Date. Likewise, you must be an employee in “good standing” (i.e., not
subject to any written disciplinary action or written performance improvement plan) at the Payment Date to be eligible for the Retention Bonus. 
 For
purposes of this Retention Bonus Letter, “cause” and/or “good standing” shall be determined in good faith by FMC in its sole discretion. A determination of “cause” and/or “good standing” by FMC shall be
binding and conclusive upon all parties. You should understand that your employment remains at-will and nothing in this Retention Bonus Letter is a guarantee of employment for any defined period of time. 

I would like to extend our appreciation to you for your past service and support and look forward to your continued involvement with us during this time and
hopefully beyond. 
  

			
	Very truly,
	
	THE FIRST MARBLEHEAD CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jo-Ann Burnham

		 	Jo-Ann Burnham
		 	Managing Director, Human Resources

  

	
	 /s/ Richard Neely

	Richard Neely
	Dated: May 29, 2014
# C_2011144EN.01000701.xml

| 14.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 May 2011

2011/C 144/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4280 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4558 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87795 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9951 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2667 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8405 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,388 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9173 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1150 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2592 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3369 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3753 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0978 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7997 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7704 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 552,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9203 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2794 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3884 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 217,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2940 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,670 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,8779 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,168 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3099 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6091 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,0710 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4280

JPY

Japanese yen

115,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4558

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87795

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9951

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2667

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8405

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,388

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9173

RON

Romanian leu

4,1150

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2592

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3369

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3753

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0978

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7997

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7704

KRW

South Korean won

1 552,39

ZAR

South African rand

9,9203

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2794

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3884

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 217,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2940

PHP

Philippine peso

61,670

RUB

Russian rouble

39,8779

THB

Thai baht

43,168

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3099

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6091

INR

Indian rupee

64,0710

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### ELECTRICAL WORKERS UNION v. COUNTRY CLUB EAST

No. 182 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 744.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 31 August 1972.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CECIL EUGENE BOYKIN, JR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:11-cv-1-MP-GRJ

LEVY COUNTY JAIL, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court on Docs. 14 and 15, Plaintiff’s motions for

extension of time to file his amended complaint and pay the initial partial filing fee. 

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED

That the motions, Docs. 14 and 15, are GRANTED. Plaintiff shall

file his amended complaint and pay the initial filing fee on or before

February 2, 2012, failing which the Court will recommend, without further

notice, that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19 day of December 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:11-cv-00001-MP-GRJ Document 16 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial data extracted from the consolidated
balance sheet and the consolidated  statements of operations and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001023745
<NAME>                        Voicenet, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,294,215
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,514,189
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,336,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          301,353
<BONDS>                                      2,104,675
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       103,430
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,827,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,336,989
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,169
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,168,959
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (41,660)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,034,708)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,034,708)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,034,708)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.21)



</TABLE>
# C_2011103EN.01000101.xml

| 2.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/1

---

2011/C 103/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 95, 26.3.2011

OJ C 95, 26.3.2011

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 89, 19.3.2011

OJ C 80, 12.3.2011

OJ C 72, 5.3.2011

OJ C 63, 26.2.2011

OJ C 55, 19.2.2011

OJ C 46, 12.2.2011

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the “Trust”) does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that: 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
/s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. HooperSenior Vice President on behalf of Simmons Bank, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust
Dated: May 15, 2019 

A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filedas part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Trust, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 
**
# C_2011149EN.01000102.xml

| 20.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6178 — Arkema/Total's Resin Division)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 149/02

On 29 April 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6178. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6178. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 1 Filed 12/18/00 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 1 Filed 12/18/00 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 1 Filed 12/18/00 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 1 Filed 12/18/00 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 1 Filed 12/18/00 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 1 Filed 12/18/00 Page 6 of 6
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 244 (Thursday, December 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72373-72374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

Ecological Restoration Plan, Final Environmental Impact 
Statement, Bandelier National Monument, New Mexico

AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of a Record of Decision on the Final 
Environmental Impact Statement for the Ecological Restoration Plan, 
Bandelier National Monument.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 42 
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C), the National Park Service announces the availability 
of the Record of Decision for the Ecological Restoration Plan for 
Bandelier National Monument, New Mexico. On September 18, 2007, the 
Regional Director, Intermountain Region, approved the Record of 
Decision for the project. As soon as practicable, the National Park 
Service will begin to implement the Preferred Alternative contained in 
the FEIS issued on August 17, 2007. Alternative B was selected as the 
Park's preferred alternative; it maximizes work efficiency and 
minimizes resource impacts by implementing restoration treatments in 
the most systematic and timely fashion possible given available 
funding. This course of action, the no-action alternative, and one 
action alternative were analyzed in the Draft and Final Environmental 
Impact Statements. Alternative C focused on treating sub-basins 
containing the highest priority cultural resource sites within 
pi[ntilde]on-juniper woodland. The full range of foreseeable 
environmental consequences was assessed, and appropriate mitigating 
measures were identified. The Record of Decision includes a statement 
of the decision

[[Page 72374]]

made, synopses of other alternatives considered, the basis for the 
decision, a description of the environmentally preferable alternative, 
a finding of no impairment of park resources and values, a listing of 
measures to minimize environmental harm, and an overview of public 
involvement in the decision-making process.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Mack, Chief of Resource 
Management, Bandelier National Monument, 15 Entrance Road, Los Alamos, 
New Mexico, 87544, 505-672-3861, extension 540, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the Record of Decision may be 
obtained from the contact listed above or online at http://parkplanning.nps.gov.

    Dated: September 18, 2007.
Michael D. Snyder,
Regional Director, Intermountain Region, National Park Service.
[FR Doc. 07-6102 Filed 12-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-EW-M
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SAM J. PEARSON, IV,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv390/LC/MD

CORRY FLEETION,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff

commenced this civil rights action on October 7, 2010 by filing a complaint under 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (doc. 1), and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2). Because

plaintiff’s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis were not on the

court forms, this court entered an order on October 20, 2010 directing plaintiff to

submit, within twenty-eight days, an amended complaint on the court form and 

either the $350.00 filing fee or a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis

on the court form. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the

order would result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. 

A copy of the October 20, 2010 order was mailed to plaintiff at his address of

record, the Escambia County Jail. However, it was returned on October 27, 2010 as

undeliverable, marked “Return to Sender, No Longer At This Address.” (Doc. 5). To

date, plaintiff has not filed a change of address form or otherwise notified the court

of his current address.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this cause be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure
Page 2 of 2

to comply with an order of the court and failure to keep the court informed of his

current address.

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file. 

At Pensacola, Florida, this 24 day of January, 2011. th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within fourteen days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that

may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Case No: 3:10cv390/LC/MD