alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JIMMIE LOU HENDRIXSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv382-RH/WCS

JOHN ASHCROFT,

Respondent.

___________________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

By petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, Jimmie Lou 

Hendrixson challenges the life sentence imposed on him by the United States 

District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Mr. Hendrixson asserts the 

sentence was based on prior state felony drug convictions that involved drug 

amounts that are too low to support the life sentence. 

In support of this assertion, Mr. Hendrixson relies on more recent Supreme 

Court decisions defining the term “crime of violence” as used in various statutes 

and in the career-offender guidelines. See, e.g., Begay v. United States, 553 U.S. 

137 (2008). Begay and similar cases do not, however, change the definition of a 

“felony drug offense” as used in the statute imposing minimum mandatory 

Case 4:10-cv-00382-RH-WCS Document 10 Filed 09/09/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:10cv382-RH/WCS

sentences in drug cases, see 21 U.S.C. § 841, or the definition of a “controlled 

substance offense” as used in the career-offender guideline. See U.S. Sentencing 

Guidelines Manual § 4B1.2(b) (2010). While the petition does not set out the 

precise basis on which a life sentence was imposed on Mr. Hendrixson, there is no 

reason to believe Begay and similar cases would have made any difference.

None of this affects the outcome of this case. As the report and 

recommendation correctly concludes, the law of the circuit now holds that this is 

not an issue that can properly be raised in a § 2241 petition. See Gilbert v. United 

States, 640 F.3d 1293 (11th Cir. 2011) (en banc). Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED. The clerk must enter 

judgment stating, “The petition is dismissed.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on September 6, 2011.

Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00382-RH-WCS Document 10 Filed 09/09/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RYAN THOMAS et al., 

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 1:10cv226-SPM/GRJ

PRODUCERS AGRICULTURE

INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER CONTINUING DEADLINES AND TRIAL

Upon consideration, Plantiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Extend Discovery

Deadlines and Reset the Trial Date (doc. 28) is granted. The following new trial

date and deadlines apply.

Plaintiffs’ expert disclosure May 1, 2011

Defendants’ expert disclosure June 1, 2011

Discovery July 1, 2011

Dispositive Motions August 1, 2011

Trial November 7, 2011

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of March, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CITIZENS STATE BANK, a Florida

Corporation, f/k/a THE CITIZENS

BANK OF PERRY,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-224-SPM/GRJ

DIXIE COUNTY, a political subdivision

of the State of Florida,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REHEARING

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Plaintiff’s

Motion for Rehearing and Motion for Relief From Judgment and Request for Oral

Argument (doc. 132). Oral argument is not necessary for the Court to rule on

this motion therefore the request will be denied. Plaintiff’s motion presents no

grounds to alter the Court’s previous ruling. Additionally, Plaintiff’s motion for

rehearing attempts to incorporate a motion to amend the complaint which is

improper procedure. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: the motion (doc. 132) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of January, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00224-SPM-GRJ Document 135 Filed 01/26/12 Page 1 of 1
# C_2010089EN.01000201.xml

| 7.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/2

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

1,00 % on 1 April 2010

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

6 April 2010

2010/C 89/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3396 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,04 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4441 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88240 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6630 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4325 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0124 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,295 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7076 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8349 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0940 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0243 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4521 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3408 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4030 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9195 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8721 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 504,51 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7333 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1438 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2717 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 125,98 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3035 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,190 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,2735 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,370 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3662 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4160 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,5520 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3396

JPY

Japanese yen

126,04

DKK

Danish krone

7,4441

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88240

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6630

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4325

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0124

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,295

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7076

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8349

RON

Romanian leu

4,0940

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0243

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4521

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3408

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4030

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9195

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8721

KRW

South Korean won

1 504,51

ZAR

South African rand

9,7333

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1438

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2717

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 125,98

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3035

PHP

Philippine peso

60,190

RUB

Russian rouble

39,2735

THB

Thai baht

43,370

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3662

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4160

INR

Indian rupee

59,5520

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134730 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134730 

 COA: 277563 

Wayne CC: 02-002708-02 

MARCUS LAMAR RUSHELL,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANTHONY SIKORA,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv159-RH/WCS

MAJOR MIKE WOOD,

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

In an order filed May 12, 2010, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended

complaint by June 11, 2010. Plaintiff was specifically warned that a recommendation

would be made that this case be dismissed if there was a failure to comply with that

order. Doc. 5. To date, no response has been received from the Plaintiff. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, this complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 
Page 2 of 2

Plaintiff shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by filing a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on July 29, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv159-RH/WCS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DONNA L. ISLER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00178-MP -GRJ

BANKERS LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 11, First Motion to Remand to State Court by

Donna L. Isler. A hearing was held today, November 23, 2010 at 1:00 p.m., to receive argument

on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. The Clerk noticed the parties of the hearing, Doc. 14, on

November 16, 2010. Ms. Ann Taylor, counsel for Defendant, attended the 1:00 p.m. hearing,

having taken a 5:30 a.m. flight from Birmingham, Alabama for that purpose. Mr. Bauer, counsel

for Plaintiff whose office is here in Gainesville, failed to appear. The Clerk contacted Mr.

Bauer’s office, which was also unable to locate him.

Ms. Taylor has spent time and accrued certain expenses to prepare for today’s hearing

and to travel to attend. At the next hearing to be held to argue Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand to

State Court, this Court will also consider those fees and expenses expended by Ms. Taylor and

whether they should be reimbursed by Mr. Bauer as a sanction for his failure to appear as

ordered. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Ms. Taylor is directed to file, no later than Monday, November 29, 2010, an

affidavit accounting for her hourly rate, time spent preparing for and traveling to
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:10-cv-00178-MP -GRJ

attend the November 23, 2010 hearing, and any expenses accrued preparing for or

attending that hearing. 

2. The Clerk is directed to re-set the hearing on Doc. 11, First Motion to Remand to

State Court, for Wednesday, December 15, 2010, at 1:00 p.m. 

3. If Mr. Bauer should wish to contest any of Ms. Taylor’s expenses, hours spent

preparing and traveling to the November 23, 2010 hearing, hourly rate, or her

entitlement thereto, he is directed to do so in writing by close of business

Monday, December 13, 2010. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of November, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40602 Conference Calendar

U NITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RUFINO AMADO

- BRUNO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:14

- CR

- 49

- 1

Before DAVIS, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rufino Amado

Bruno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Amado

- Bruno h a s not filed a respo nse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 1 6 , 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40602 Document: 00513079750 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/16/2015No. 14

- 40602

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-40602 Document: 00513079750 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/16/2015
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6821

FRANCIS BROOKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GERRI LEVISTER, Warden; S. 

HOLLEMBAEK, Warden; DERICK PHILIP, Medical Doctor; TERRY 

KILPATRICK; C. DUCHESNE, Medical Doctor; JANELLE WILLIAMS, 

Psychiatrist,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ALEX SEDA, Medical Doctor; JOHN DOES 1-100,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:16-ct-03166-BO)

Submitted: November 19, 2019 Decided: November 22, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Francis Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Rudy E. Renfer, Assistant United States Attorney,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Francis Brooks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint 

filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b)(1), 2671-2680 (2012), 

and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brooks v. United States, No. 5:16-ct-03166-

BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2017, July 20, 2018 & May 30, 2019). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2009294EN.01000501.xml

| 3.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 December 2009

2009/C 294/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5090 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4419 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90430 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3413 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5072 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4210 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,972 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7080 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1086 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2455 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2622 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6262 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5766 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,6949 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0742 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0830 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 741,27 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0459 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,3009 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3080 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 238,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0951 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,184 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,1100 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,031 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5950 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,3303 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,9200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5090

JPY

Japanese yen

131,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4419

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90430

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3413

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5072

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4210

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,972

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7080

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1086

RON

Romanian leu

4,2455

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2622

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6262

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5766

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,6949

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0742

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0830

KRW

South Korean won

1 741,27

ZAR

South African rand

11,0459

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,3009

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3080

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 238,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0951

PHP

Philippine peso

70,184

RUB

Russian rouble

44,1100

THB

Thai baht

50,031

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5950

MXN

Mexican peso

19,3303

INR

Indian rupee

69,9200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Wayne
      Rockall, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
      Yarraman Winery, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Yarraman Winery, Inc.




I,
      John
      Wells, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
      Yarraman Winery, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with
      the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Yarraman Winery, Inc.




September
      27, 2006






By:
            /s/
                Wayne RockallWayne
                Rockall
              Chief
                Executive OfficerBy:
            /s/
                John WellsJohn
                Wells
              Chief
                Financial Officer
1UPUsE ZU 10

(FAX) P.UUZ/UUZ

uo.04

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR GULF COUNTY, FLORIDA

CHELESTA DAWSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND

AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE = C!
ESTATE OF WILLIE DAWSON, DECEASED Ss ;/Ocev 2
PLAINTIFF, Rs-M®

Vs. : . CASE NO.: 10-42-CA
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, W. FRANK MCKEITHEN

IN HIS OFFICIAL. CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF BAY COUNTY,

CITY OF MEXICO BEACH AND JOSEPH NUGENT IN HIS

OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF GULF COUNTY: FLORIDA,

DEFENDANTS.
/

ORDER ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW
THIS CAUSE having been considered on the foregoing Motion To Withdraw as counsel
of record for Plaintiffs, filed by MARK STALLWORTH, ESQUIRE ‘aad SMITH &
STALLWORTH P.A,, the Court having reviewed the file and being otherwise fully advised in

the premises, it is therefore,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and Co-Counsel of
Record for the Plaintiffs, by MARK STALLWORTH, ESQUIRE, and SMITH &
STALLWORTH PA, and SANGA TURNBULL, ESQUIRE and HARDAWAY TURNBULL
LAW FIRM are all hereby GRANTED. Plaintiffs have A-S days from this order in which

to retain différent counsel related to this Inatter,

D AND ORDRED in chambers at Gulf County, Florida on this eA day of
20 . ~ .
LE Up

Circnit Judge

co: CHELESTA DAWSON
114 8. Highway 224A, Apt. 5, Panama City, FL 32404

Filed! 004"40UIsDeF InSangr7s5


TUFU4F2ZU1U

ugiba (FAX) P.001/002
SMITH & STALLWORTH
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

201 EAST KENNEDY BOULEVARD * SUITE 1475
TAMPA, FLORIDA 33602
TELEPHONE: (813) 223-7799
FACSIMILE: (813) 223-7711
www.SmithStallworth.com
EACSMILE COVER SHEET

DATE: Monpay, OCTOBER 04, 2010

To: SHEILA HursT-RAYBORN ACTING CLERK OF COURT

Attn: Susan Anderson

Fax No: 850-769-7528

FROM: THE Law Firm oF SMITH & STALLWORTH

RE: CHELESTA DAWSON, Individually &

AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
ESTATE OF WILLIE DAWSON, DECEASED

v.
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, BAY COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, MEXICO
BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, & GULF COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE

Case No. 10-42 CA Section

#OFPaGES: 2
INCLUDING COVER SHEET

The information contained in this facsimile message is attorney privileged and confidential information, intended only for the use of
the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please contact Courtney Smith or Mark Stallworth at (813) 223-7799
United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

 

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

Muldoon

V. 07-cv-3535

Red-Horse

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the above-entitled action is

reassigned to the calendar of

Judge Berman

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the Clerk’s Office of the

Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned judge’s initials after the case number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice of

Reassignment on all defendants.

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Dated: 5/21 /07

By: Lourdes Aquino

 Deputy Clerk 

 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

PS REASSIGNMENT FORM 

Data Quality Control Revised: March 9, 2001

Case 1:07-cv-03535-AKH Document 3 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 1 of 1