alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

LINDA K. MCCANDLESS, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10cv209-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated December 20, 2011. (Doc. 13). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED and

REMANDED pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to properly consider the

opinion of plaintiff’s treating physician, Dr. Irfan Nasir, and to conduct such further

proceedings as deemed appropriate.

DONE and ORDERED this 20th day of January, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:10-cv-00209-MP-GRJ Document 14 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 1
# C_2010288EN.01000401.xml

| 23.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/4

---

Plenary session

(2010/C 288/05)

On 20 September 2010, in accordance with Article 32(1), second indent, of the Rules of Procedure, the General Court decided that if, following the designation of an Advocate-General under Article 17 of the Rules of Procedure, there is an even number of Judges in the General Court sitting in plenary session, the rota established in advance, applied during the period of three years for which the Presidents of the Chambers of five Judges are elected, according to which the President of the General Court designates the Judge who will not take part in the judgment of the case, is in the reverse order to that of the precedence of the Judges according to their seniority in office in accordance with Article 6 of the Rules of Procedure, unless the Judge so designated is the Judge-Rapporteur. In that latter case, the Judge immediately senior to him will be designated.

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

**Certification**

** **

I, Douglas Polinsky, certify that:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dated: May16, 2016	

/s/ Douglas M. Polinsky 	

DOUGLAS M. POLINSKY

*Chief ExecutiveOfficer*

**
Exhibit No. 32.1


Latin America Ventures, Inc.


File No. 0-53132


Form 10-Q


Quarter ended March 31, 2010








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Latin America Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Pierre Galoppi, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: April 30, 2010

/s/ Pierre GaloppiPierre GaloppiChief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer














A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Latin America Ventures, Inc. and will be retained by Latin America Ventures, Inc. furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### United States Parole Commission

## Public Announcement

Pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (Public Law 94-409) [5 U.S.C. 552b]

# Agency Holding Meeting:

Department of Justice, United States Parole Commission.

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Thursday, October 25, 2007.

# Place:

5550 Friendship Blvd., Fourth Floor, Chevy Chase, MD 20815.

# Status:

Open.

# Matters To Be Considered:

                        The following matters have been placed on the agenda for the                         *open*                         Parole Commission meeting:                    

1. Approval of Minutes of July 2007 Quarterly Business Meeting.

2. Reports from the Chairman, Commissioners, Chief of Staff, and Section Administrators.

3. Consideration of “Evaluation and Re-Validation of the U.S. Parole Guidelines Risk Instrument” by James Austin and Roger Ocker.

# Agency Contact:

Thomas W. Hutchison, Chief of Staff, United States Parole Commission, (301) 492-5990.

Dated: October 17, 2007.

Sharon A. Gervasoni,

Acting General Counsel, U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-5219  Filed 10-18-07; 11:44 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-M
Converted by EDGARwiz





This correspondence confirms the agreement entered into by and between Arazu, Inc., a Florida Corporation (the “Company”) with and David Lovatt, an individual (the “Service Provider”).




Whereas, the Service Provider shall perform certain services (the “Services”) rendered to the Company and desires to be compensated for such services in cash and shares of common stock of the Company (the “Common Shares”) and the Company desires to compensate the Service Provider with cash and Common Shares as set forth herein. Now therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants the Company and Service Provider acknowledge and agree as follows: 




1.

Service Provider is to provide the following services to the Company:




a.

Corporate services such as advise on US bank account procedures and requirements




b.

Incorporation of the Company in Florida




c.

Location of Corporate agent




d.

Website design and liaison with Web Development services




e.

Business Plan development




f.

Marketing Services




g.

Software Development Introductions




h.

Project Management Services




2.

The Services Provider is to commence the Services on April 1st 2014 and completed the Services on September 30th 2014.




3.

The Services are to be provided in a professional and workman like manner in accordance with good industry practices.




4.

The Service Provider is an independent contractor and not an employee or agent of the Company.  The Company did not, will not and is not required to make social security, workers’ compensation, or unemployment insurance payments on behalf of the Service Provider.




5.

As payment for the services, the Service Provider shall receive 1,020,000 of the Common Shares in total plus $5,000 per month. The shares shall be issued upon signing. The cash portion is earned monthly, but can be accrued until the contract is complete by mutual agreement.




6.

Upon issuance the Common Shares shall be validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.




7.






1










Agreed and Accepted on this 1st day of March 2014.




Arazu, Inc.




By :________________________     (Signature)




       Paul Clewlow     (Print Name)




Service Provider




By : ________________________     (Signature)




        David Lovatt    (Print Name)






2
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3771

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Delmar L. Hill, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 4, 1997 Filed: June 9, 1997

___________ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. This case is remanded to the district court with directions to make the ordered restitut ion obligation joint and several with the similar obligation ordered in Unite d States v. Barry R. Moss , CR. 96-00010-001 (District of Nebraska). A true copy. ATTEST: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Soy Energy, LLC (the
Company) for the quarter ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dallas Thompson,
Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

| |                                
| | -------------------------------
| | /s/ Dallas
 Thompson           
| |                                
| | Dallas
 Thompson, Treasurer and
| | Chief
 Financial Officer       
| |                                
| | Dated: March
 17, 2010         
| |                                

---
[No. 941.]

#### MICHAEL HARRISON, Respondent, *v.*WILLIAM H. LOCKWOOD, Appellant.

Statement Must Be Piled in Time. — A statement on motion for new trial which was not filed within the time allowed hy law should, on motion, be stricken out. ( *Williams*v. *Rice,*13 Nev. 235, affirmed.)

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, Eureka County.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*John T. Baker,*for Appellant.

*G. J. Lansing and D. E. Body,*for Despondent.

By the Court,

Leonard, J.:

This was an action upon a promissory note, and James Beilley, Thomas Beilley, and William H. Lockwood, partners, under the firm name of Beilley *&*Lockwood, were made defendants. Judgment was rendered against Thomas Beilley and Lockwood on the eighteenth of July, 1878, for one thousand six hundred and twenty-five dollars and fifty-seven cents, besides interest and costs. On the twenty-fifth of July, 1878, appellant alone filed a notice of motion for a new trial, and on August 31, 1878, he filed a statement on motion for a new trial. The motion was denied August 31, 1878. Defendant Lockwood alone appeals from the judgment only. There is no statement on appeal, and the statement on motion for a new trial was filed long after the time allowed by law therefor, and long subsequent to the time given for filing a statement on appeal. Bespondent moves to strike out the statement on motion for a new trial, and on the authority of *Williams*v. *Rice et al.,*13 Nev. 235, the motion must prevail. There is then nothing left for us to consider but the judgment roll. In that no error appears and none is claimed. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
# C_2010311EN.01000402.xml

| 16.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5990 — Investor/Molnlycke)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 311/03

On 10 November 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5990. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5990. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SMG Indium Resources Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alan C. Benjamin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: June 20, 2011

/s/ Alan C. BenjaminName:
Alan C. BenjaminTitle:
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER DOUGAN, 

Petitioner, 

vs. CASE NO. 1:09CV173-MMP/AK

WALTER MCNEIL, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________/

O R D E R

Petitioner, an inmate proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. Petitioner did not, however, file a

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. Review of

Petitioner's petition will be therefore be deferred until the $5.00 filing fee is paid or

an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is submitted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk of court shall forward to Petitioner an application for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis.

2. Petitioner shall have until September 21, 2009, to either file an application

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $5.00 filing fee.

 3. Failure to respond to this order as instructed will result in a

recommendation of dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and failure to

comply with an order of this court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of August, 2009.

s/A.Kornblum

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
# C_2009039EN.01000102.xml

| 18.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5418 — Blackfriars/Vink Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 39/02)

On 5 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5418. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5418. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MICHAEL GOLDEN, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:11cv54-SPM/WCS

GOVERNOR RICK SCOTT, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated March 4, 2011. Doc. 7. Plaintiff has been furnished

a copy and has filed objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). Doc. 8. 

Despite the objections, I have determined that the report and

recommendation is correct and should be adopted. The dismissal of this case as

recommended by the magistrate judge is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s

opportunity to refile if his conviction or sentence is overturned. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 7) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted.

3. The clerk shall note on the docket that this case was dismissed in

accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of March, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:11cv54-SPMWCS
# C_2010283EN.01001501.xml

| 20.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/15

---

Calls for proposals under the 2011 work programme ‘People’ of the Seventh EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

2010/C 283/07

Notice is hereby given of the launch of calls for proposals under the 2011 work programme ‘People’ of the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following calls. Calls deadline and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website.

‘People’ Specific Programme:

‘People’ Specific Programme:

| Call Title | Call Identifier |
| --- | --- |
| Co-funding of Regional, National and International Programmes | FP7-PEOPLE-2011-COFUND |
| International Research Staff Exchange Scheme | FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IRSES |
| Career Integration Grants | FP7-PEOPLE-2011-CIG |

Call Title

Call Identifier

Co-funding of Regional, National and International Programmes

FP7-PEOPLE-2011-COFUND

International Research Staff Exchange Scheme

FP7-PEOPLE-2011-IRSES

Career Integration Grants

FP7-PEOPLE-2011-CIG

These calls for proposals relate to the 2011 work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2010) 4897 of 19 July 2010.

These calls for proposals relate to the 2011 work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2010) 4897 of 19 July 2010

Information on the modalities of the calls, the work programme, and the guide for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5568]



[[Page 62866]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--LiMo Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 3, 2007, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), LiMo Foundation (``LiMo'') 
filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General 
and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. 
The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Innopath Software, 
Inc., Sunnyvale, CA; Wind River Systems, Alameda, CA; ARM Holdings, 
PLC, Cambridge, UNITED KINGDOM; MontaVista Software, Inc., Santa Clara, 
CA; Broadcom Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA; Acrodea, Inc., Tokyo, JAPAN; 
Ericsson AB, Stockholm, SWEDEN; SoftBank Corp., Tokyo, JAPAN; NX B.V., 
Eindhoven, THE NETHERLANDS; and KT Freetel Co., Ltd., Seoul, REPUBLIC 
OF KOREA, have been added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of this group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and LiMo intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 1, 2007, LiMo filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 9, 
2007 (72 FR 17583).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 15, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on September 11, 2007 (72 FR 51841).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-5568 Filed 11-06-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M