alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010103EN.01000701.xml

| 22.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 April 2010

2010/C 103/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3373 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4421 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86900 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5954 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4329 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8955 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,286 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,13 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7077 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8713 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1370 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9852 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4387 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3335 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3814 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8811 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8366 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 481,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9128 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1304 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2571 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 049,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2740 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,338 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,9845 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,061 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3426 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3311 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,5830 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3373

JPY

Japanese yen

124,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4421

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86900

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5954

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4329

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8955

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,286

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,13

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7077

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8713

RON

Romanian leu

4,1370

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9852

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4387

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3335

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3814

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8811

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8366

KRW

South Korean won

1 481,31

ZAR

South African rand

9,9128

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1304

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2571

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 049,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2740

PHP

Philippine peso

59,338

RUB

Russian rouble

38,9845

THB

Thai baht

43,061

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3426

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3311

INR

Indian rupee

59,5830

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ANTHONY EVANS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:11cv103/RV/CJK

CORR. OFFICER OATES, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 11, 2012. (Doc. 46). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have

made a de novo determination of objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed

objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:11-cv-00103-RV-CJK Document 47 Filed 07/11/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure

to prosecute and failure to comply with orders of the court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of July, 2012.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:11cv103/RV/CJK

Case 3:11-cv-00103-RV-CJK Document 47 Filed 07/11/12 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION





I, Erwin
Vahlsing, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify
that:





1. I have
reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended August 31, 2009 of Sungro Minerals, Inc.; and





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;








December
      15, 2009
            /s/Erwin
      Vahlsing, Jr.Erwin
      Vahlsing, Jr.
              Chief
      Financial Officer
```

EXHIBIT 3.4 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                 VOICENET, INC.

          Voicenet,  Inc., a  corporation  organized  and existing  under and by
virtue  of  the  General   Corporation   Law  of  the  State  of  Delaware  (the
"Corporation"), does hereby certify as follows:

          FIRST:  That  Article  FOURTH of the  Certificate  of Amendment of the
Certificate of  Incorporation  of the Corporation be amended by striking Article
FOURTH in its entirety and replacing therefor:

                    FOURTH:  The Corporation  is authorized to issue two classes
               of stock to  be  designated,  respectively,  "Common  Stock"  and
               "Preferred  Stock." The total  number of shares of all classes of
               stock which the  Corporation  is authorized to issue is Fifty-One
               Million  (51,000,000) shares, $.01 par value, which shall consist
               of  50,000,000  shares of common  stock and  1,000,000  shares of
               preferred stock."

          SECOND:  By written  consent dated March 2, 2000,  given in accordance
with the provisions of Section 228 of the General  Corporation  Law of the State
of Delaware,  the holder(s) of a majority of the outstanding  shares of stock of
the Corporation have approved the adoption of the aforesaid resolution.

          THIRD:   That  this   Certificate   of  Amendment  of  Certificate  of
Incorporation has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section
242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

          IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the Corporation  has caused this  Certificate of
Amendment  of the  Certificate  of  Incorporation  to be  signed  by  its  Chief
Executive Officer this 2nd day of March 2000.

                                       VOICENET, INC.

                                       By : /s/ Frank Carr
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Frank Carr
                                            Chief Executive Officer
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ALISON SAPP WHITE, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-102/RS-EMT

BREG, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

 

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (Doc. 3) alleges that jurisdiction is supported 

by 28 U.S.C. § 1332, diversity of citizenship between the parties. Proper jurisdiction is a 

prerequisite to the judicial resolution of claims. Ex parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506, 514 

(1869).

The Medical Devise Amendments of 1976 (“MDA”), 21 U.S.C. § 360(c), et. seq., 

to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 301, et. seq., preempt certain state law 

claims. 21 U.S.C.S. § 360k(a) reads as follows: 

[N]o State or political subdivision of a State may establish or 

continue in effect with respect to a device intended for human 

use any requirement--

 (1) which is different from, or in addition to, any 

requirement applicable under this Act to the device, and

 (2) which relates to the safety or effectiveness of the device 

or to any other matter included in a requirement applicable to 

the device under this Act.

Case 3:10-cv-00102-RS-EMT Document 82 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 2
A recent case in the Eleventh Circuit, Wolicki-Gables v. Arrow Int'l, Inc., 634 F.3d 

1296 (11th Cir. 2011), found that the MDA preempted certain state law claims against a 

pain pump manufacturer. Specifically, claims under Florida law for “strict liability for 

manufacturing and design defect and failure to warn, and . . . negligent design, 

manufacture, and assembly” were preempted. Id. Here, the Amended Complaint alleges

two causes of action related to the pain pump in question -- strict products liability and 

negligence (Doc. 3, p. 7-8). 

Neither party has addressed this critical issue of federal preemption. Because 

federal preemption, if applicable, would eliminate this court’s jurisdiction to hear these 

state law claims, this issue must be resolved before a ruling on the Motion for Summary 

Judgment (Doc. 53). 

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant shall file a memorandum addressing MDA 

preemption as it relates to the facts and allegations of this case not later than May 13, 

2011. Plaintiff shall file a response not later than May 23, 2011. 

ORDERED on May 4, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00102-RS-EMT Document 82 Filed 05/04/11 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.3

SPECIAL SERVICER'S ANNUAL STATEMENT 
OF COMPLIANCE

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

                             OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




                  Re:   Asset Securitization Corporation,
                        Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
                        Certificates, Series 1996-D3




As an authorized officer of CRIIMI MAE Services Limited
Partnership, I certify that (i) a review of the activities of
the Special Servicer, for the period ending December 31, 1996
and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
dated as of October 1, 1996, (the "Agreement"), has been made
under my supervision, (ii) to the best of  my knowledge, based
on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such year, (iii) to the best of my knowledge, each
related sub-servicer has fulfilled its obligations under its
sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and (iv) the
Special Servicer has received no notice regarding qualification
or challenge to any portion of the Upper-Tier REMIC or
Lower-Tier REMIC as a REMIC from the Internal Revenue Service or any
other governmental agency or body.


CRIIMI MAE Services Limited Partnership
Special Servicer




/s/ Maribeth Stahl                                        
By:   Maribeth Stahl
Its:  Vice President


Dated:      March 12, 1997
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001310

13-DEC-2016

08:59 AM
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

PAULA A WASHINGTON,

o/b/o MPB,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00186-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

SCHEDULING ORDER

This Social Security appeal came on for consideration by the United States

Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.2(D). The Court has

reviewed the Answer filed by the Commissioner and, accordingly, it is:

ORDERED that counsel shall confer in person or by telephone to discuss

whether the parties consent to the United States Magistrate Judge conducting all further

proceedings in this case, including entry of final judgment, with appeal to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. If the parties consent to the United

States Magistrate Judge conducting all further proceedings, the parties shall file a

Consent Form. Absent consent, the United States Magistrate Judge will prepare a

report and recommendation to the United States District Judge. It is:

FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before the following dates, the parties shall file

and serve a brief setting forth concisely the basis for the affirmance or reversal of the

final decision of the Commissioner, and a detailed analysis of the administrative record,

with citation of authorities in support of the party’s position, and to the
Page 2 of 2

administrative record:

PLAINTIFF: February 2, 2011

COMMISSIONER: April 4, 2011

Oral argument is not a necessary part of the review process, and the Court

normally determines Social Security appeals on the basis of the briefs without oral

argument. Motion practice in accordance with Rule 12(c) (judgment on the pleadings)

or Rule 56 (summary judgment) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is

inappropriate. Similarly, Plaintiff may seek remand in the brief, but should not file a

separate motion to remand.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6 day of December 2010. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00186-MP -GRJ
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Guanwei Recycling Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Chen
Min, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:




1. The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and;




2. The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      May 17, 2010/s/
      Chen MinChen
      Min
              Chief
      Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BILL NORKUNAS,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-470/RS-MD

SANDESTIN INVESTMENTS, LLC,

et al.,

Defendants. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

The relief requested in Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time 

(Doc. 9) is GRANTED. Defendant Sandestin Investments, LLC, shall file its response no 

later than December 29, 2010. 

ORDERED on December 2, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                   0001023519
<NAME>                  Miami Computer Supply Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1
<CURRENCY>                                   US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                             780,875
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,648,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                        12,072
<INVENTORY>                                      5,894,838
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,744,316
<PP&E>                                           2,108,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,091,850
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,775,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,533,060
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,073,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,775,208
<SALES>                                         63,427,728
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,427,728
<CGS>                                           52,061,042
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,231,890
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   322,914
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 312,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,872,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                       755,693
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,117,231
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,117,231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .44



</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 3:11cr13/MCR/EMT

 3:16cv385/MCR/EMT

JAMES N. BROWN

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated October 14, 2016. ECF No. 486. The parties have been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections

thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should

be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 3:11-cr-00013-MCR-EMT Document 487 Filed 11/17/16 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Defendant’s “Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or

Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody” (ECF No. 481) is SUMMARILY

DISMISSED.

3. Defendant’s “Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915” (ECF No. 482) is DENIED as moot.

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of November 2016.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:11cr13/MCR/EMT; 3:16cv385/MCR/EMT

Case 3:11-cr-00013-MCR-EMT Document 487 Filed 11/17/16 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011116EN.01000301.xml

| 14.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 April 2011

2011/C 116/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4493 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4584 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88980 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0300 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2995 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8620 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,390 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,17 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9584 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1110 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1921 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3814 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3938 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2693 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8360 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8197 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 573,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7978 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,4687 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3671 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 546,36 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3812 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,654 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,7905 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,696 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2999 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1016 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,5010 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4493

JPY

Japanese yen

121,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4584

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88980

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0300

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2995

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8620

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,390

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,17

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9584

RON

Romanian leu

4,1110

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1921

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3814

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3938

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2693

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8360

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8197

KRW

South Korean won

1 573,87

ZAR

South African rand

9,7978

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,4687

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3671

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 546,36

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3812

PHP

Philippine peso

62,654

RUB

Russian rouble

40,7905

THB

Thai baht

43,696

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2999

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1016

INR

Indian rupee

64,5010

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KATHLEEN SCHUKNECHT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10v190-SPM/WCS

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT

OF FINANCIAL SERVICES,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case has been dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the parties’

Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (doc. 12) and Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, the clerk shall close this case.

SO ORDERED this 23rd day of June, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board ofDirectorsBPZ Energy, Inc.Houston, Texas

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementsof BPZ Energy, Inc. on Form S-8 (SEC File Nos. 333-116508 and 333-126388) ofour report dated March 14, 2007  relatingto the consolidated balance sheets of BPZ Energy, Inc. and Subsidiaries (AnExploratory Stage Company), as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cashflows for the three years ended December 31, 2006, which report is included inthe Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
| /s/  Johnson Miller & Co. CPA’s, P.C. |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Midland, Texas                                 |   |   |
|                                           |   |   |
| March 14, 2007                                 |   |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of LEAF Equipment Finance Fund 4, L.P. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Crit S. DeMent, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                       |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Crit S. DeMent                                    |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Name: Crit S. DeMent                                  |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner