alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CANTON OMAR DISMUKES,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:10cv295/MCR/MD

WALTER A. MCNEIL,

Respondent.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 

(Doc. 1). Contrary to 28 U.S.C. § 2242 and the directions on the petition form, the petition

does not name as respondent the person who has custody over petitioner; rather, it names

"Bill McCullum, Florida." (Doc. 1, p. 1). As the appropriate official is the Secretary of the

Florida Department of Corrections, Walter A. McNeil, he shall be substituted as respondent

in this cause, as the court has already done in the caption of this order. With that

correction, the petition appears to be in the proper form; however, petitioner has not

provided the court with service copies of his petition. Petitioner must submit two identical

service copies: one for the respondent and one for the Attorney General of the State of

Florida. The court cannot make copies for the petitioner, unless he submits payment in the

amount of $.50 per page, prepaid, to the Clerk of this court.

Additionally, petitioner has neither paid the $5.00 filing fee nor applied for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner’s case cannot proceed until he either pays the filing

fee or files a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. A complete

application includes a motion with supporting affidavit, a prisoner consent form and a

financial certificate with account attachments (a printout of the transactions in petitioner’s

inmate trust account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his

petition). 
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Walter A. McNeil, as Secretary for the Florida Department of Corrections, is

hereby substituted as the respondent in this action. The Clerk shall change the docket to

so reflect. 

2. The Clerk shall forward to the petitioner a form application for leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on the form.

3. Within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this order, petitioner shall either pay

the $5.00 filing fee in full, or submit a complete application for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis. 

4. Within the same time period, petitioner shall either: (1) provide two identical

service copies of his petition, or (2) submit payment in the amount of $8.00 to the Clerk of

Court for the cost of copying his 8-page petition. 

5. Petitioner’s failure to comply with this order as instructed will result in a

recommendation to the District Court that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with

an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26 day of August, 2010. th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv295/MCR/MD
Case 3:10-cv-00323-RS-EMT Document 1-1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 1
NUMBER 13-16-00172-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

GLENN ROMERO, JUAN GONZALEZ, 

RICARDO BENAVIDES AND ROMERO, 

GONZALEZ & BENAVIDES, L. L. P., Appellants,

v.

ZACHARIAS GONZALEZ, Appellee.

On appeal from the 93rd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

On April 4, 2016, appellants, Glenn Romero, Juan Gonzalez, Ricardo Benavides, 

and Romero, Gonzalez & Benavides, L.L.P. filed a petition for permission to appeal from 

the 93rd Judicial District Court’s denial of their motion to dismiss. In the certificate of 
2

service, appellants certified that they had served Mark Cantu as attorney for appellee, 

Zacharias Gonzalez. In their docketing statement, appellants indicated that Mark Cantu, 

State Bar Number “23767445,”1 had been disbarred as of April 11, 2016. On June 22, 

2016, Mark A. Cantu III, state bar number “03767445,” filed a notice of appeal challenging 

the trial court’s judgment of disbarment signed on April 11, 2016. Cantu then filed a 

motion to stay the disbarment with our Court. On July 14, 2016, this Court denied the 

motion stating the following:

“A district court judgment of disbarment . . . from the practice of law cannot 

be superseded or stayed.” TEX. R. DISCIPLINARY P. 3.14. We treat 

disciplinary rules with the same authority as statutes. See O’Quinn v. State 

Bar of Tex., 763 S.W.2d 397, 399 (Tex. 1988). In his motion, Cantu argues 

exactly for the type of relief that Rule 3.14 expressly and unambiguously 

prohibits. Therefore, the Court, having examined and fully considered the 

motion for emergency relief and response, is of the opinion that the motion 

should be denied.

Given the foregoing, we ABATE this matter and REMAND it to the trial court in 

order for the trial court to consider whether appellee wishes to retain other counsel. The 

trial court is ordered to immediately cause notice to be given and conduct a hearing on 

this matter. The trial court shall make and file appropriate findings of fact and 

conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a clerk’s record; cause the hearing 

to be transcribed and included in a reporter’s record; and have these records forwarded 

to the Clerk of this Court within thirty days from the date of this order. If the trial court 

requires additional time to comply, the trial court should so notify the Clerk of this Court.

 

1 We find no other Mark Cantu at the State Bar of Texas website, and it appears that appellants 

incorrectly indicated that Mark Cantu’s state bar number begins with a “2” instead of “0.”
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

1st day of Novemberpe, 2016.
# C_2010314EN.01000301.xml

| 18.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/3

---

Special Report No 5/2010 ‘Implementation of the Leader approach for rural development’

2010/C 314/03

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 5/2010 ‘Implementation of the Leader approach for rural development’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION of

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with
the Annual Report of EFJ, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jana Ahlfinger Bell, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | /S/ Jana Ahlfinger Bell
|                     |  | Jana Ahlfinger Bell    
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                     | 
|Date: March 13, 2008 |  |                        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORP., 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:11-cv-32/RS-CJK

JOHNSON et al., 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

In Response to my Order (Doc. 65), Plaintiff has represented (Doc. 70) that the 

following Defendants in the consolidated case 1:10-cv-207/RS-GRJ , have operations or 

reside in districts outside of the Northern District: 

Defendant Residence District Operations District 

Mac Daddy’s Irish 

Pub, Inc.

Pasco MD Pasco MD

David Morgan Hillsborough MD Hillsborough MD

Robert Kodritch Hillsborough MD Hillsborough MD

Nick Wright Pasco MD Pasco MD

Harold E. Sonnay, 

Jr.

Unknown Unknown Pasco MD

Ballmer 

Entertainment 

Enterprises 

Pinellas MD Pinellas MD

Alice Ballmer Pinellas MD Pinellas MD

Chris Ballmer Pinellas MD Pinellas MD

Case 1:10-cv-00207-RS-GRJ Document 63 Filed 09/07/11 Page 1 of 2
Peter A. Ravelo Unknown Unknown Dade MD

Jorge Ledo Unknown Unknown Dade SD

Frantz Baron Unknown Unknown Broward SD

Rod Seafood Inc. Dade SD Dade SD

Hume Enterprises, 

LLC

Dade SD Dade SD

Holleman’s 

Restaurant & 

Lounge, Inc.

Dade SD Dade SD

Bernard Ravelo Dade SD Dade SD

IT IS ORDERED: 

The clerk is directed to transfer these Defendants to the appropriate district. 

ORDERED on September 7, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cv-00207-RS-GRJ Document 63 Filed 09/07/11 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Dmitry Lyakutin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge, Onyx China, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Onyx China, Inc.   Date: May 14, 2009                 By: /s/ Dmitry Lyakutin --------------------------------------- Dmitry Lyakutin, President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Autobytel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the
Report), we, James E. Riesenbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael F. Schmidt, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    JAMES E.
RIESENBACHJames E. Riesenbach Chief Executive Officer March 15, 2007/s/    MICHAEL F.
SCHMIDTMichael F. Schmidt Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer March 15, 2007




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TIMOTHY A. BRAGG and VIOLETA

C. BRAGG, Individually and as Parents

and Natural Guardians of S.E.B., a Minor,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 3:09cv383/LAC

TERRALL NEAL MOORE, DO; RANDALL

EUGENE SCOTT, P.A.; and PYHAMERICA

GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION

Upon a review of the files in this case and in Case No. 3:09cv382/MCR, and of

Defendants’ Motion to Consolidate, the Court has determined that these cases present

common questions of fact or law. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), district

courts possess the managerial authority to consolidate cases as a matter of judicial

expedience and to eliminate duplication of effort. See Young v. City of Augusta, Ga.

Through DeVaney, 59 F.3d 1160, 1169 (11th Cir. 1995). Plaintiffs oppose full consolidation

on grounds of potential prejudice because their claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act

must be tried before the Court while the rest of their claims may be tried before a jury. This

matter may be later addressed, however, through the bifurcation of trials if this is deemed

appropriate.
Accordingly, the Court Orders:

1. Defendants’ Motion to Consolidate (doc. 5) is GRANTED.

2. Pursuant to Rule 42(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., this case is hereby transferred to the

Honorable M. Casey Rodgers, with her consent, and is consolidated with Case No.

3:09cv382/MCR for all further proceedings. 

ORDERED on this 6th day of January, 2010.

s/L.A. Collier

Lacey A. Collier

Senior United States District Judge
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 4.10


                                  EXCHANGE FORM
                                       OF
                        CIRCLE CREEK AQUACULTURE V, L.P.
                                       FOR
                                  INVESTOR NOTE

         This exchange offer relates to your 10.35% Note(s) ("Investor Note[s]")
issued by Circle Creek AquaCulture V, L.P. (The "Partnership") for which AquaPro
Corporation, a Tennessee corporation ("AquaPro") is offering to exchange your
Investor Note(s) for shares of its 7.0% convertible Series A Preferred Stock
(the "Preferred Stock"). Reference is made to the Prospectus dated May 28, 1997
(the "Prospectus") and the Letter of Instructions dated June 30, 1997. This
Exchange Form incorporates by reference the representations, warranties,
covenants and agreements set forth in the Letter of Instructions. Your
Partnership has participated in the Consolidation and AquaPro has assumed the
obligations under your Investor Note.

     The undersigned hereby elects to exchange $___________ of principal amount
     of my Investor Note(s) for shares of the Series A Preferred Stock at the
     rate of 1.30 shares of Series A Preferred Stock for each $10.00 of unpaid
     balance of my Investors Note(s).

         By signing this Exchange Form, you hereby covenant and agree (a) to be
bound by the terms of the Exchange Offer described in the Prospectus, and (b) to
execute and deliver (and you are hereby irrevocably appoint George S. Hastings,
Jr. as your attorney-in-fact to execute and deliver on your behalf) such
additional documents and instruments as may be reasonably required to consummate
the Exchange of your Investor Notes as elected herein. The foregoing power of
attorney is hereby declared to be irrevocable and a power coupled with an
interest, and it shall survive your subsequent death, incompetency, dissolution,
disability, incapacity, bankruptcy or termination and shall extend to your
heirs, successors and assigns. Each person signing this Exchange Form also
affirms and makes the other representations, warranties, covenants and
agreements set forth in the Letter of Instructions.

         IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED ASSISTANCE IN COMPLETING THE EXCHANGE
FORM, PLEASE CALL AQUAPRO CORPORATION, THE INFORMATION AGENT, TOLL-FREE AT
1-800-264-3456.

PLEASE DATE, SIGN, AND MAIL THIS EXCHANGE FORM EXACTLY AS YOUR NAME APPEARS ON
THE MAILING LABEL, UNLESS YOUR NAME IS PRINTED INCORRECTLY. NO POSTAGE REQUIRED
IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES.


--------------      ---------------------           --------------------
                          SIGNATURE                       SIGNATURE


        D                Signature             (Second Signature, if necessary)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6775

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTIAN PHILIP PARKER, a/k/a Armani, a/k/a Super P, a/k/a Sup, a/k/a 

King,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:09-cr-00529-LO-2; 16-cv-00700-LO)

Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 29, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christian Philip Parker, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Alexander, Mysti Dawn Degani, 

Brian David Harrison, Scott Butler Nussbum, Katherine Rumbaugh, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Mary Katherine Barr Daly, Lawrence Joseph Leiser,

Karen Ledbetter Taylor, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christian Philip Parker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for 

reconsideration of the court’s prior order granting Parker’s motion for a sentence 

reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012), in which Parker sought a further 

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See

United States v. May, 855 F.3d 271, 274 (4th Cir. 2017) (noting that prohibition on a 

district court’s consideration of a motion to reconsider a § 3582 order is not jurisdictional 

and is waived if not invoked by the government). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2009178EN.01002801.xml

| 31.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/28

---

ESPON 2013 programme — New open calls

2009/C 178/14

In the framework of the ESPON 2013 programme, calls for proposals and expression of interest will be launched on 16 September 2009.

Please visit www.espon.eu for more detailed information.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Transcrypt International, Inc.

    We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-30673) on Form S-8 of Transcrypt International, Inc. (the "Company") of our
report dated February 12, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996 and the
related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholder's equity
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1998, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company
dated March 30, 1999.

                                                  /s/ KMPG Peat Marwick LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
March 30, 1999
# C_2009147EN.01000902.xml

| 27.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5320 — Almeco/Mage/Tinox)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 147/07

On 18 June 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5320. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5320. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5205 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, as the ‘‘Sergeant Kenneth Eric 

Bostic Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2018 

Mr. KIHUEN (for himself, Ms. ROSEN, Ms. TITUS, and Mr. AMODEI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, as 

the ‘‘Sergeant Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT KENNETH ERIC BOSTIC POST OF4 FICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, 

7 Nevada, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant 

8 Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office’’. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5205 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Kenneth 

5 Eric Bostic Post Office’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS