alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2331 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to clarify the availability and 

appropriateness of training for local food service personnel, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mrs. MURRAY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 to clarify the 

availability and appropriateness of training for local food 

service personnel, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Training 

5 for School Food Service Workers Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2331 IS

1 SEC. 2. TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION OF ALL LOCAL 

2 FOOD SERVICE PERSONNEL. 

3 Section 7(g)(2)(B) of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 

4 (42 U.S.C. 1776(g)(2)(B)) is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘(iv) AVAILABILITY AND APPRO7 PRIATENESS OF TRAINING.— 

8 ‘‘(I) IN GENERAL.—A training 

9 program carried out under this sub10 paragraph shall— 

11 ‘‘(aa) to the maximum ex12 tent practicable, be scheduled 

13 during regular, paid working 

14 hours; 

15 ‘‘(bb) be offered in-person, if 

16 appropriate; 

17 ‘‘(cc) incorporate hands-on 

18 training techniques; and 

19 ‘‘(dd) be provided at no cost 

20 to food service personnel. 

21 ‘‘(II) PROGRAM OUTSIDE WORK22 ING HOURS.—In the event that a 

23 training program carried out under 

24 this subparagraph is scheduled out25 side of regular, paid working hours— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2331 IS

1 ‘‘(aa) efforts shall be made 

2 to inform food service personnel 

3 of the necessity of the program 

4 to be scheduled outside of reg5 ular, paid working hours; 

6 ‘‘(bb) food service personnel 

7 shall be consulted to schedule the 

8 program at a time that is mini9 mally disruptive to the personnel 

10 participating in the training pro11 gram; 

12 ‘‘(cc) compensation shall be 

13 provided to food service personnel 

14 attending the program at the 

15 regular rate of pay, including any 

16 applicable overtime rate; and 

17 ‘‘(dd) food service personnel 

18 shall not be penalized or in any 

19 other manner discriminated 

20 against for not being able to at21 tend the program. 

22 ‘‘(v) RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER

23 LAWS.—Nothing in this subparagraph su24 persedes or otherwise modifies any Fed25 eral, State, or local law or legal obligation 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
4 

•S 2331 IS

1 governing the relationship between an em2 ployee and employer.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

BRUCE RICH,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00157-MP-GRJ

WALTER A MCNEIL, et al., 

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Julie Deno’s Motion for Relief from

Default. (Doc. 34). Plaintiff filed his Complaint on August 9, 2010, against Defendant

Deno and several other defendants. (Doc. 1). Defendant Deno was served with

process on April 5, 2011, with her answer due June 6, 2011. (Doc. 23). On July 25,

2011, Plaintiff moved for a default judgment against Defendant Deno (Doc. 30) and on

July 26, 2011 the clerk entered a default. (Doc. 32). Counsel for Defendant Deno also

represents Defendants McNeil, Furhman, Andrews, Taylor, and Thigpen in this action

and filed an answer to the complaint on behalf of these defendants on July 18, 2011. 

(Doc. 29). Defendant Deno requests that the Court set aside the default, citing

excusable neglect.

Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c) provides that “[t]he court may set aside an entry of default

for good cause.” Good cause is a liberal standard that varies from situation to situation,

but relevant factors for a court to consider are whether a default was “culpable or willful,

whether setting it aside would prejudice the adversary, and whether the defaulting party

Case 1:10-cv-00157-MP-GRJ Document 37 Filed 07/28/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

presents a meritorious defense.” Compania Interamericana Export-Import, S.A. v.

Compania Dominicana de Aviacion, 88 F.3d 948, 951 (11 Cir. 1996). Defendant th

Deno’s failure to respond to the Complaint was not “culpable or willful” and appears to

be an administrative oversight. The discovery period in this case was initiated the day

before Defendant Deno’s motion, and at this point in the progress of the case, Plaintiff

will not be prejudiced if the default is set aside. Defendant Deno is likely to present a

meritorious defense similar to the answer filed by her counsel on behalf of other

defendants in this case. (Doc. 29). Therefore, there is good cause to set aside the

default.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Defendant Deno’s Motion for Relief from Default (Doc. 34) is GRANTED.

2. The Clerk’s default entered on July 26, 2011 (Doc. 32) is SET ASIDE.

3. Defendant Deno shall file her response to the Complaint (Doc. 1) on or

before August 8, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28 day of July, 2011. th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00157-MP -GRJ

Case 1:10-cv-00157-MP-GRJ Document 37 Filed 07/28/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011008EN.01000301.xml

| 13.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 January 2011

2011/C 8/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2973 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 108,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4496 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83155 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,8435 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2622 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7060 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,390 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,57 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7009 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8425 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2525 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0377 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3098 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2784 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0858 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7113 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6754 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 445,89 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 8,8815 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5671 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4015 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 715,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9734 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,017 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,3615 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,400 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,1812 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,6831 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 58,5050 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2973

JPY

Japanese yen

108,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4496

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83155

SEK

Swedish krona

8,8435

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2622

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7060

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,390

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,57

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7009

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8425

RON

Romanian leu

4,2525

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0377

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3098

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2784

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0858

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7113

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6754

KRW

South Korean won

1 445,89

ZAR

South African rand

8,8815

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5671

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4015

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 715,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9734

PHP

Philippine peso

57,017

RUB

Russian rouble

39,3615

THB

Thai baht

39,400

BRL

Brazilian real

2,1812

MXN

Mexican peso

15,6831

INR

Indian rupee

58,5050

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008 of CFO Consultants, Inc. (the Company) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.  Very truly yours,   /s/ Norm LeBeoufNorm LeBeoufChief Executive Officer/s/ Norm LeBeoufNorm LeBeoufChief Financial OfficerDated: October 28, 2008   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to CFO Consultants, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.

SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Powergae, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew Kovalenko, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                                                                          
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Andrew Kovalenko                                                     
|                    |  |     |  | Andrew Kovalenko                                                         
|                    |  |     |  | Chairman, President Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer)
# C_2010325EN.01001001.xml

| 2.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/10

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

1,00 % on 1 December 2010

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 December 2010

2010/C 325/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3115 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 110,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4528 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1540 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3178 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,961 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 280,45 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7097 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0202 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2973 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9610 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3615 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3360 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1864 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7589 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7176 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 508,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2045 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7390 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4243 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 812,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1338 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,184 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,2445 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,443 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2349 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,2214 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,4664 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3115

JPY

Japanese yen

110,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4528

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83930

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1540

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3178

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,961

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

280,45

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7097

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0202

RON

Romanian leu

4,2973

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9610

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3615

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3360

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1864

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7589

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7176

KRW

South Korean won

1 508,78

ZAR

South African rand

9,2045

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7390

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4243

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 812,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1338

PHP

Philippine peso

57,184

RUB

Russian rouble

41,2445

THB

Thai baht

39,443

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2349

MXN

Mexican peso

16,2214

INR

Indian rupee

59,4664

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
# C_2010104EN.01001201.xml

| 23.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/12

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 April 2010

2010/C 104/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3339 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,03 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4420 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86675 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6152 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4325 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8995 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,365 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7075 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8795 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1416 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9820 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4390 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3341 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3535 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8759 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8311 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 478,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9710 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1056 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2600 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 024,89 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2671 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,154 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,9285 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,958 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3441 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,2904 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,3680 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3339

JPY

Japanese yen

124,03

DKK

Danish krone

7,4420

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86675

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6152

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4325

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8995

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,365

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7075

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8795

RON

Romanian leu

4,1416

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9820

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4390

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3341

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3535

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8759

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8311

KRW

South Korean won

1 478,28

ZAR

South African rand

9,9710

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1056

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2600

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 024,89

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2671

PHP

Philippine peso

59,154

RUB

Russian rouble

38,9285

THB

Thai baht

42,958

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3441

MXN

Mexican peso

16,2904

INR

Indian rupee

59,3680

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 11 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 11 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2010013EN.01001001.xml

| 20.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5502 — Merck/Schering-Plough)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 13/02

On 22 October 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5502. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5502. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

*Time and Date:*                     10 a.m. (Eastern Time), December 19, 2007.                 

*Place:*                     4th Floor, Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC.                 

*Status:*                     Open.                 

*Matters to be Considered:*

1. Approval of the minutes of the June 12, 2007 meeting. 

2. Report of the Executive Director on Thrift Savings Plan Status. 

3. Discussion of frequent trading. 

4. Other proposals. 

5. New business. 

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Thomas K. Emswiler, Committee Management Officer, (202) 942-1660.                 

Dated: November 30, 2007. 

Thomas K. Emswiler, 

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board. 

[FR Doc. 07-5947 Filed 11-30-07; 4:21 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

PROPHET PAULCIN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv483-RH/WCS

DUANE SPEARS et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER DENYING THE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR A NEW TRIAL AND DENYING FIVE 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO TAX COSTS

The plaintiff is a prisoner who was sprayed with oleoresin capsicum or 

“OC.” He sued seven employees of the Florida Department of Corrections, 

asserting that he should not have been sprayed at all and that in any event he was 

not afforded an adequate opportunity to remove the spray after it was administered. 

I granted summary judgment for two defendants. The claims against the other five 

defendants went to trial. The jury returned a verdict for two defendants, and I 

granted judgment as a matter of law for another. The plaintiff ultimately prevailed 

and obtained a judgment for one dollar in nominal damages against the last two 

defendants. 

Case 4:10-cv-00483-RH-WCS Document 99 Filed 02/27/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:10cv483-RH/WCS

The plaintiff has moved for a new trial. The motion is unfounded for 

reasons set out (a) in the Order Directing the Entry of Judgment, ECF No. 92, (b)

on the record during the trial, and (c) in the summary-judgment order, ECF No. 51.

The five defendants who prevailed have filed a bill of costs. All five were 

represented by the Attorney General at public expense. That of course would not 

preclude an award of costs; had these been the only five defendants, costs would be 

taxed in their favor. But these were not the only defendants. The plaintiff 

prevailed against two other defendants. The costs were incurred not only to defend 

the five defendants who prevailed but also to defend the two defendants who did 

not. Under all the circumstances, as a matter of discretion, I conclude that costs 

should not be taxed for these five defendants. 

For the reasons,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, ECF No. 96, is DENIED. 

2. The motion of five defendants to tax costs, ECF No. 94, is DENIED.

SO ORDERED on February 27, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00483-RH-WCS Document 99 Filed 02/27/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cr-00012-MP-AK

ERIC KIMBLE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 42, Motion for Approval to Attend State Hearing

via Video, filed by Defendant Eric Kimble. A hearing is presently scheduled at the Alachua

County Criminal Courthouse, at Gainesville, Florida, on Thursday, July 22, 2010, at 9:00 a.m.,

before the Honorable Walter M. Green, Circuit Judge. The government does not object to a

Court order allowing Mr. Kimble to participate via videoconference, and Mr. Kimble would not

have to leave the Alachua County Detention Center, where he is his now housed. Accordingly,

it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Court approves Mr. Kimble’s video attendance for the State Court hearing on

Thursday, July 22, 2010, at 9:00 a.m., from the Alachua County Detention Center. Mr.

Kimble will not be required to physically leave the facility. Officials having custody of

Mr. Kimble shall bring him to the video conference facility within the Alachua County

Detention Center in order for him to participate in this hearing.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of July, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Uranium Power Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended April 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:
September 15, 2003
    
    
    By
    /s/ Thornton J. DonaldsonThornton J. Donaldson, President and
Chief Executive Officer