alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



The Board of Directors
FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP, INC.



We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-91802) on Form S-8 of FIRSTFED AMERICA BANCORP, INC. and subsidiaries,
("FIRSTFED") of our report dated April 23, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of FIRSTFED as of March 31, 2003 and 2002, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 2003,
which report appears in the March 31, 2003, annual report on Form 10-K of
FIRSTFED.

                                             /s/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
June 20, 2003
# C_2010321EN.01000401.xml

| 26.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 November 2010

2010/C 321/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3321 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4558 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84645 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2705 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3326 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,720 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,35 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9789 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2995 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9660 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3595 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3454 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3369 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7547 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7428 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 524,67 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3897 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8595 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4150 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 944,66 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1800 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,708 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,6510 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,036 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2902 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4481 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,7000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3321

JPY

Japanese yen

111,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4558

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84645

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2705

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3326

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,720

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,35

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9789

RON

Romanian leu

4,2995

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9660

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3595

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3454

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3369

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7547

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7428

KRW

South Korean won

1 524,67

ZAR

South African rand

9,3897

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8595

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4150

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 944,66

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1800

PHP

Philippine peso

58,708

RUB

Russian rouble

41,6510

THB

Thai baht

40,036

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2902

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4481

INR

Indian rupee

60,7000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# CA2010023DE.01000101.xml

| 30.1.2010 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 23/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 23/1

---

Berichtigung der Ausschreibung der Stelle des Exekutivdirektors (m/w) (Besoldungsgruppe AD14) der Europäischen Arzneimittel-Agentur (EMEA)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 9 A vom 15. Januar 2010
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 9 A vom 15. Januar 2010

(2010/C 23 A/01)

Seite 2, Rubrik „Bewerberprofil“:

anstatt:

| „— | der unten genannte Hochschulabschluss sollte idealerweise in den Fächern Physik, Pharmazie oder Veterinärmedizin erworben worden sein;“ |
| --- | --- |

„—

der unten genannte Hochschulabschluss sollte idealerweise in den Fächern Physik, Pharmazie oder Veterinärmedizin erworben worden sein;“

muss es heißen:

| „— | der unten genannte Hochschulabschluss sollte idealerweise in den Fächern Medizin, Pharmazie oder Veterinärmedizin erworben worden sein;“. |
| --- | --- |

„—

der unten genannte Hochschulabschluss sollte idealerweise in den Fächern Medizin, Pharmazie oder Veterinärmedizin erworben worden sein;“.

---
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of G.L.H., a child, * From the 42nd District Court

of Coleman County,

Trial Court No. CV06755.

No. 11-19-00312-CV * January 22, 2021

* Opinion by Trotter, J.

(Panel consists of: Trotter, J.,

Williams, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Bailey, C.J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of 

this appeal are taxed against Audrey Holmquest.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JAMES W. ROWCLIFF, III,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-282/RS-EMT

LUTHER J. RONGSTAD,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Petition for Appointment of a Receiver and Complaint for 

Damages (Doc. 1) and Memorandum in Support of Petition (Doc. 16), and Plaintiff’s 

Answer (Doc. 6) and Response to Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Support and CounterPetition for Appointment of Receiver (Doc 19). 

The imposition of a receiver is a “drastic measure, the detrimental business effects 

of which should be carefully considered.” SEC v. Spence & Green Chemical Co., 612 

F.2d 896, 904 (5th Cir. 1980)1. Here, neither party has demonstrated that the potential 

harm and expense of a receiver would be less than that caused by the denial of an 

appointment. Nor has either party demonstrated a probability of success in the 

underlying action. See Feldkamp v. Long Bay Partners, LLC, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 

66987 (M.D. Fla. 2010) (listing factors courts consider when appointing receivers). 

 

1

In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc) the Eleventh Circuit adopted as 

binding precedent all the decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on 

September 30, 1981.
Plaintiff’s Petition for Appointment of a Receiver (Doc. 1) and Defendant’s 

Counter Petition for Appointment of a Receiver (Doc. 19) are DENIED. 

ORDERED on November 8, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WILLIAM N. TAYLOR, 

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv338/MCR/EMT

DAVID MORGAN, et al.

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 16, 2011 (Doc. 27). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been

filed.1

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, the court has

determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply 

On July 6, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking leave to file an amended complaint and stating he

1

would make arrangements to pay $100 towards the filing fee by July 8, 2011 (doc. 28). The court granted this

motion and the order was mailed to Plaintiff but was returned as undeliverable. The court has attempted to

locate another address for the Plaintiff without success; the Escambia County Jail records indicate he has

been released and his address is listed as homeless. No payment has been received since the filing of that

motion and no amended complaint has been filed.

Case 3:10-cv-00338-MCR-EMT Document 31 Filed 07/29/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2011.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv338/MCR/EMT

Case 3:10-cv-00338-MCR-EMT Document 31 Filed 07/29/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2010234EN.01000101.xml

| 28.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/1

---

2010/C 234/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 221, 14.8.2010

OJ C 221, 14.8.2010

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 209, 31.7.2010

OJ C 195, 17.7.2010

OJ C 179, 3.7.2010

OJ C 161, 19.6.2010

OJ C 148, 5.6.2010

OJ C 134, 22.5.2010

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JACKIE JEROME JAMES, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00521-MP-CAS

KENNETH S. TUCKER, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated June 7, 2012. (Doc. 42). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of petitioner’s timely filed objections. (Doc. 48).

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss amended habeas petition as untimely (doc.

37) is GRANTED.

3. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 is DISMISSED as untimely and a certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant

to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.

4. Petitioner’s motion for evidentiary hearing (doc. 47) is DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of July, 2012.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:10-cv-00521-MP-CAS Document 50 Filed 07/16/12 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C 1350)





Each of the undersigned officers of Cole Credit Property Trust III, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, for purposes of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:





(i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Cole Credit Property Trust III, Inc.By:
/s/ Christopher H. ColeName:
Christopher H. ColeTitle:
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)By:
/s/ D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Name:
D. Kirk McAllaster, Jr.Date:
May 10, 2011

Title:
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such filing, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates by reference.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5637]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

Agency:  United States Election Assistance Commission.

Action:  Notice of public meeting for EAC Standards Board.

Date and Time:  Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. and 
Thursday, December 13, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. and Friday, December 14, 
2007, 8:30 a.m.-12 p.m.

Place:  Omni Hotel Downtown, 700 San Jacinto Boulevard at 8th Street, 
Austin, TX 78701, Phone number (512) 476-3700.

Purpose:  The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Standards 
Board, as required by the Help America Vote Act of 2002, will meet to 
consider and receive presentations on the proposed next iteration of 
the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), as were submitted to EAC 
from the commission's Technical Guidelines Development Committee 
(TGDC). The Standards Board will formulate recommendations to EAC 
regarding the guidelines and consider other administrative matters. The 
EAC Board of Advisors will meet at the same time and some of the 
Standards Board sessions will be held jointly with the Board of 
Advisors.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

For Further Information Contact:  Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-
3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-5637 Filed 11-7-07; 4:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                      |   |   |                                                                                                                        |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Marie C Moffett                                                                                  |   |   | /s/      Rodger D  Spainhower                                                                                               |
| Name: Marie      C MoffettTitle:      President and Chief Operating OfficerDate:      April 20, 2009 |   |   | Name:      Rodger D SpainhowerTitle:      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate: April 20,      2009 |

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41670 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONALD DAVID COLONE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:01-CR-253-1

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Ronald David Colone (“Colone”) has requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Colone has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-41670 -2- counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
# C_2010080EN.01000101.xml

| 27.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/1

---

2010/C 80/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 63, 13.3.2010

OJ C 63, 13.3.2010

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 51, 27.2.2010

OJ C 37, 13.2.2010

OJ C 24, 30.1.2010

OJ C 11, 16.1.2010

OJ C 312, 19.12.2009

OJ C 297, 5.12.2009

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cr85-SPM

BYRON WHITAKER, 

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One and Two of this

indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing

Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a

report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties

consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it

is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.
Page 2 of 3

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:10cr85-SPM
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on January 10, 2011. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:10cr85-SPM
#### DOTSON v. CHEMICAL CORP.

No. 62 PC.

Case below: 10 N.C. App. 123.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 2 February, 1971.
`[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71651-71656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-6062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 08-23]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-23 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: December 11, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 71652]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE07.004


[[Page 71653]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE07.005


[[Page 71654]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE07.006


[[Page 71655]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE07.007


[[Page 71656]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN18DE07.008

[FR Doc. 07-6062 Filed 12-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C`
Case 3:01-cr-00110-RV Document 26 Filed 08/08/05 Page 1 of 1