alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009042EN.01001101.xml

| 20.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 February 2009

(2009/C 42/05)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2705 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4504 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88230 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8987 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4922 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6790 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,587 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 300,39 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7068 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6749 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2733 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1361 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9597 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5868 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8521 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4653 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9389 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 874,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,6859 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6844 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4745 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 347,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6437 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,870 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,6970 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,179 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9520 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,4667 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,1248 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2705

JPY

Japanese yen

118,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,4504

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88230

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8987

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4922

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6790

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

28,587

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

300,39

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7068

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6749

RON

Romanian leu

4,2733

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1361

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9597

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5868

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8521

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4653

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9389

KRW

South Korean won

1 874,24

ZAR

South African rand

12,6859

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6844

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4745

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 347,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6437

PHP

Philippine peso

60,870

RUB

Russian rouble

45,6970

THB

Thai baht

45,179

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9520

MXN

Mexican peso

18,4667

INR

Indian rupee

63,1248

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
**                                                                                                                       Exhibit13.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the AnnualReport on Form 20-F of DRDGOLD Limited (the "Company") for the fiscalyear ended June 30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the "Report"), Adriaan Jacobus Davel, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)                      the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                      the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Adriaan Jacobus Davel

By:       Adriaan JacobusDavel

Title:    Chief FinancialOfficer

Date:    October 31, 2018

 

 

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Otter Tail Ag Enterprises, LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Anthony Hicks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  May 20, 2008

 
|   | /s/  Anthony Hicks       |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Anthony  Hicks           |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 28 (Monday, February 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 6578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-606]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Spray Drift Task Force

    Notice is hereby given that, on December 29, 2006, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Spray Drift Task Force 
(``SDTF'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of the antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, AgValue Enterprises, Inc., Visalia, CA joined SDTF and 
was subsequently acquired by United Phosphorous, Inc., Trenton, NJ. 
Also, the membership formerly owned by AgValue Enterprises, Inc., 
Visalia, CA, but acquired by United Phosphorous, Inc., Trenton, NJ, was 
transferred to Etigra, LLC, Cary, NC. The membership formerly held by 
Griffin Corporation, Valdosta, GA, but acquired by E.I. duPont de 
Nemours and Company, Newark, DE, was transferred to Mitsui Chemicals, 
Tokyo, Japan. The membership formerly held by Alsan Research, Ankeny, 
IA, but acquired by Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN, was 
transferred to Isagro, Morrisville, NC. The membership formerly held by 
Nations Ag II, LLC, Knoxville, TN, but acquired by Makhteshim-Agan of 
North America, Inc., Raleigh, NC, was transferred to Zhejiang Tide Crop 
Science Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, People's Republic of China. Futhermore, 
UCB Chemicals Corporation, Gent, Belgium transferred its membership to 
Taminco, Inc., Gent, Belgium. Also, Arvesta Corporation, San Francisco, 
CA changed its name to Arysta LifeScience North America Corporation, 
and relocated to Cary, NC; Crompton Corporation, Bethany, CT changed 
its name to Chemtura Corporation; and Chimac-Agriphar SA, Ougree, 
Belgium changed its name to Agriphar SA.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and SDTF intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 15, 1990, SDTF filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 5, 
1990 (55 FR 27701).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 25, 
2003. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on September 26, 2003 (68 FR 55657).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-606 Filed 2-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KEVIN M. TAYLOR,

 Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:09cv304/RS/MD 

B. GORDAN, et al.,

 Defendants.

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon plaintiff’s response (doc. 8) to an order to show

cause (doc. 7) issued on November 18, 2009.

On October 9, 2009 this court entered an order (doc. 6) granting plaintiff leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and assessing an initial partial filing fee of $8.33 to be paid

within thirty days. Thirty days elapsed, and plaintiff did not pay the initial partial filing fee.

Accordingly, on November 18, 2009 this court entered an order (doc. 7) directing

plaintiff to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an

order of the court. Plaintiff now responds (doc. 8) by submitting an updated account

statement from his inmate trust account. Although the account statement reveals that

plaintiff has only $0.72 in his account and has not received a deposit since July 14, 2009,

the court notes that prior to plaintiff commencing this action on September 4, 2009, he

received regular deposits into his inmate trust account. (See Doc. 5). Accordingly, the

court will not modify the initial partial filing fee at this time, but will grant plaintiff an

extension of time in which to pay it. 
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit the initial partial

filing fee of $8.33. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this case be

dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to comply with an order of the court. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 3 day of December, 2009

rd

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 5:09cv304/RS/MD
| 1.     | Such quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 28, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such quarterly report of Form 10-Q for the quarter ending February 28, 2011, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Oteegee Innovations Inc. |

| Date: April 19, 2011                                                                                                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                |
| Oteegee Innovations Inc.                                                                                                                            |
|                                                                                                                                                |
| /s/ Jordan Starkman                                                                                                                                 |
| Jordan StarkmanPresident, Chief Executive OfficerChairman of the Board of DirectorsChief Financial Officer, Controller,Principal Accounting Officer |
|                                                                                                                                                |
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

EXEVIOUS SWAYNE LEE,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-187-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL DOUGLAS, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On January 21, 2011, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause on or before

February 4, 2011, as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with

the Court’s order to provide a service copy of the fist amended complaint. That order

was returned to the Court as undeliverable. Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a

current address, and the Clerk has been unable to obtain a current address for Plaintiff. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed for

failure to comply with an order of the Court and for failure to prosecute. 

IN CHAMBERS, at Gainesville, Florida, this 22 day of April 2011.

nd

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case 1:10-cv-00187-MP-GRJ Document 14 Filed 04/22/11 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 32(b)



                                    TXU CORP.
                       Certificate Pursuant to Section 906
                         of Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
                               CERTIFICATION OF CFO


     The  undersigned, H. Dan Farell, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial  Officer of TXU Corp. (the  "Company"),  DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

  1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
     31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be
executed this 12th day of March, 2004.




                                        /s/ H. Dan Farell
                                   -------------------------------------
                                   Name:   H. Dan Farell
                                   Title:  Executive Vice President
                                           and Chief Financial Officer









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to TXU Corp. and will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Kevin T. Michaels, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: February 19, 2003
|
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Real Goods Solar, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Erik Zech, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 13, 2008

/s/ Erik ZechErik ZechPresident and Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 1 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 2 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 3 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 4 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 5 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 6 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 7 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 8 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 9 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 10 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 11 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 12 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 13 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 14 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 15 of 16
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 3 Filed 02/05/01 Page 16 of 16
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cr42-SPM

MICHAEL ALAN REAID,

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Count One of this indictment. The

district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing Defendant's proposed

change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a report and recommendation

as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties consented to this procedure, and

the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the
Page 2 of 3

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:10cr42-SPM
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on July 2, 2010. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:10cr42-SPM
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00266

- CV

L ADEITRA S TEWARD

, Appellant

V

.

L A F RONTERA S OUTH P HASE O NE

AND T HE V

ILLAS OF L

A F RONTERA

S OUTH P HASE O NE H OMEOWNERS

A SSOCIATION

, Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 352nd District Court

of Tarrant County (352

- 305799

- 19)

August 29, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismisse d for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel Justice Lee Gabriel
#### HAYMORE v. HIGHWAY COMM.

No. 154 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 691.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1972.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CORNELIUS DEWAYNE TAYLOR,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO.: 5:10cv194/SPM/MD

UNITED STATES BUREAU OF

PRISONS, et al.,

Respondents.

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon petitioner filing an amended petition for writ of

habeas corpus (doc. 7) under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The petition appears to be in the proper

form, the petitioner has submitted the appropriate service copies, and the filing fee has

been paid.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The clerk of court is directed to furnish copies of the petition and this order to the

United States Attorney for this district, and the Attorney General of the United States. 

Respondents shall have sixty (60) days from the date of this order in which to show cause,

if any there be, why the relief requested should not be granted.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of October, 2010.

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
#### DILLS v. SUMNER

No. 283 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 585.

Petition by defendants Clyde M. and Martha I. Sumner for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 August 1981.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

AVERY SOUFFRANT,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-270/RS-GRJ

SMILEY, and SELLERS,

Defendants. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 45). No 

objections have been filed. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and is 

incorporated in this Order. 

2. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 30) is GRANTED. 

3. This case is dismissed in its entirety. 

4. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

ORDERED on February 23, 2012.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00270-RS-GRJ Document 46 Filed 02/23/12 Page 1 of 1