alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5238 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2018 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1234 Saint Johns Place in Brooklyn, New 

York, as the ‘‘Major Robert Odell Owens Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 5238 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. MAJOR ROBERT ODELL OWENS POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1234 Saint Johns Place in 

4 Brooklyn, New York, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Major Robert Odell Owens Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Major Robert Odell 

10 Owens Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

          - [AC-16: OTS Nos. 05763 and H-4444]

                    Notice is hereby given that on October 10, 2007, the Office of Thrift Supervision approved the application of First Federal Savings Bank, Clarksville, Tennessee, to convert to the stock form of organization. Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment (phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail:                     *Public.Info@OTS.Treas.gov*) at the Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the OTS Southeast Regional Office, 1475 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309.                

Dated: October 11, 2007.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Legal Information Assistant.

[FR Doc. 07-5117  Filed 10-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

HUBERT CECIL DAVIDSON, III,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv255/RS/EMT

MICHELLE M. ALLEN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Response to the show cause order issued by the

undersigned on November 16, 2010 (Doc. 12). In his Response, Plaintiff requests that the court

dismiss the instant civil rights case, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 13).

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that an action may be dismissed without an order of the court

by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before the adverse party serves an answer or files a motion

for summary judgment. Because Defendants have not yet been served in the instant case, it is clear

that Plaintiff is automatically entitled to a voluntary dismissal at this time.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That Plaintiff’s Response, construed as a motion for voluntary dismissal (Doc. 13), be

GRANTED and this case be DISMISSED without prejudice.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 30th day of November 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No.: 3:10cv255/RS/EMT
#### STATE v. WILLIS TONY CADDELL.

(Filed 3 November, 1965.)

Appeal by defendant from *Olive, E.J.,*June 21, 1965 Criminal Session, DavidsoN Superior Court.

The Grand Jury returned a bill of indictment charging the defendant with the felonious breaking, entering into, and larceny of a TV set and $25.00 in money from a storehouse occupied by South Main Sunoco Service Station. Some questions arose with respect to the *564form of the indictment in that it failed to designate the ownership of the property stolen. Whereupon, by agreement with the Solicitor, the defendant and his counsel, in writing, waived indictment and entered a plea of guilty to a written information signed by the Solicitor charging the felonious breaking into the storehouse occupied by South Main Sunoco Service Station and the larceny therefrom of described personal property of Carl Massey of the value of $175.00. The court imposed a single prison sentence of not less than six years nor more than ten years. The defendant appealed.

*T. W. Bruton, Attorney General, Theodore C. Brown, Jr., Staff Attorney for the State.*

*Ned A. Beeker, Court Appointed Counsel for defendant appellant.*

PER Cueiam.

The defendant’s court-appointed counsel, by brief and by oral argument here, urged that the court committed error in giving consideration to the FBI fingerprint record presented to the court on the question of punishment. The record disclosed a number of arrests without showing what disposition was made of the cases.

The punishment imposed was well within the limits prescribed for housebreaking. The fingerprint record was presented in open court in the presence of defendant and his counsel. They had opportunity to point out any errors in the record or to make any explanations with respect thereto. We are sure the careful and conscientious Judge did not give any improper consideration to the fingerprint record. In the judgment, we find

No error.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shengrui Resources Co. Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  September 13, 2010





By:        /s/ Arthur Skagen


Arthur Skagen


Chief Executive Officer
# C_2009248EN.01000101.xml

| 16.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 October 2009

2009/C 248/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4864 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4439 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,91470 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3355 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5132 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3350 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,872 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7088 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2225 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2963 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1520 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6214 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5360 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,5196 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0027 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0698 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 716,27 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,8403 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1502 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2550 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 884,77 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9921 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,850 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,7510 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,794 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5450 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,4889 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,7980 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4864

JPY

Japanese yen

134,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4439

GBP

Pound sterling

0,91470

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3355

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5132

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3350

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,872

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7088

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2225

RON

Romanian leu

4,2963

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1520

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6214

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5360

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,5196

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0027

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0698

KRW

South Korean won

1 716,27

ZAR

South African rand

10,8403

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1502

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2550

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 884,77

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9921

PHP

Philippine peso

68,850

RUB

Russian rouble

43,7510

THB

Thai baht

49,794

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5450

MXN

Mexican peso

19,4889

INR

Indian rupee

68,7980

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

INDEPENDENT FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Independent Film Development Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Earl Williams, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  January 28, 2009



/s/ Kenneth G. Eade

Kenneth G. Eade

Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT



To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of

Infonet Services Corporation

El Segundo, California



We have
audited the consolidated financial statements of Infonet Services Corporation and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 2002 and 2003, and for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2003, and have issued our report thereon dated June 20,
2003 (included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in Item 16. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information
set forth therein.



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP                                
|Deloitte & Touche LLP  Los Angeles, California June 20, 2003





SCHEDULE II



INFONET SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



|DESCRIPTION                                          |  | BALANCE ATBEGINNINGOF PERIOD |  | CHARGED TOCOSTS ANDEXPENSES |  | CHARGEDTO OTHERACCOUNTS |  | DEDUCTIONS |  | BALANCE ATEND OFPERIOD
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------- |  | ----------------------
|Allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits |  |                              |  |                             |  |                         |  |            |  |                       
|2001                                                 |  | 8,364                        |  | 2,282                       |  | 3,296                   |  | 87         |  | 13,855                
|2002                                                 |  | 13,855                       |  | 759                         |  | 436                     |  | 120        |  | 14,930                
|2003                                                 |  | 14,930                       |  | 7,059                       |  | 3,396                   |  | 7,720      |  | 17,665
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00343-CR

Charles Edward Cross, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 264TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 55293, HONORABLE MARTHA J. TRUDO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Charles Edward Cross was placed on deferred adjudication community

supervision after pleading guilty to aggravated assault. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.02 (West

Supp. 2004-05). The court later granted the State’s motion to adjudicate and sentenced Cross to four

years in prison.

Cross’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable

grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d

807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v.

State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App.
2

1969). Cross received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate

record and file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

___________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Patterson and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: October 13, 2005

Do Not Publish
# C_2010040EN.01000401.xml

| 17.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 February 2010

2010/C 40/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3649 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4430 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87050 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,8770 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4678 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0520 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,028 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,37 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7086 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0135 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1134 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0649 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5229 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4264 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6062 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9419 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9205 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 571,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5360 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3264 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2930 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 712,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6753 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,934 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,1587 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,320 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5312 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6140 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 63,0745 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3649

JPY

Japanese yen

122,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4430

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87050

SEK

Swedish krona

9,8770

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4678

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0520

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,028

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,37

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7086

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0135

RON

Romanian leu

4,1134

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0649

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5229

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4264

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6062

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9419

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9205

KRW

South Korean won

1 571,65

ZAR

South African rand

10,5360

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3264

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2930

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 712,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6753

PHP

Philippine peso

62,934

RUB

Russian rouble

41,1587

THB

Thai baht

45,320

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5312

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6140

INR

Indian rupee

63,0745

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2010240EN.01000101.xml

| 7.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 September 2010

2010/C 240/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2874 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 108,42 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4459 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83825 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3013 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3070 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8800 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,703 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 284,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9333 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2868 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9345 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4032 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3320 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9997 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7783 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7320 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 506,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,2912 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7381 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3000 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 572,66 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0097 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,138 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,4398 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,103 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2352 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6642 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,9160 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2874

JPY

Japanese yen

108,42

DKK

Danish krone

7,4459

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83825

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3013

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3070

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8800

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,703

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

284,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9333

RON

Romanian leu

4,2868

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9345

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4032

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3320

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9997

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7783

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7320

KRW

South Korean won

1 506,83

ZAR

South African rand

9,2912

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7381

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3000

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 572,66

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0097

PHP

Philippine peso

57,138

RUB

Russian rouble

39,4398

THB

Thai baht

40,103

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2352

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6642

INR

Indian rupee

59,9160

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-40533

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DIEGO LUMBRERAS-RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:12-CR-160-1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Diego LumbrerasRamirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lumbreras-Ramirez filed a responsive letter raising 

an issue and alternatively asking for an extension of time to file a response. 

We granted him an extension, but he did not file an additional brief. We have 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-40533 Document: 00512598085 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
No. 13-40533

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein, together with Lumbreras-Ramirez’s letter. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-40533 Document: 00512598085 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
# C_2010228EN.01000501.xml

| 25.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5779 — Comcast/NBC Universal)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 228/02

On 13 July 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5779. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5779. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---