alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATION







Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of East Fork Biodiesel, LLC (the Company), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  May 17,  2010
By:
/s/Chris L. DanielChris L. DanielChief Executive OfficerDate:  May 17,  2010
By:
/s/Jack W. Limbaugh, Jr.Jack W. Limbaugh, Jr.Treasurer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131025 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131025 COA: 257684 Wayne CC: 02-001170-01 TERRELL COUNTS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 2, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 29, 2006

Clerk
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 12a0618n.06

No. 11-4065

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO MARTINEZ-BRAVO,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON PETITION FOR REVIEW

FROM A FINAL ORDER OF THE

BOARD OF IMMIGRATION

APPEALS

BEFORE: MARTIN and CLAY, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. Fernando Martinez-Bravo, who is represented by counsel, petitions for

review of a final order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The BIA dismissed his appeal

from the decision of an Immigration Judge (IJ) who denied his request for cancellation of removal

under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b. 

Martinez-Bravo is a native and citizen of Mexico who has been present in the United States

since at least 2000. In 2006, the government issued a notice to appear, charging Martinez-Bravo

with removability under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(I). Martinez-Bravo conceded removability and

sought cancellation ofremoval. Following a hearing, the IJ denied Martinez-Bravo’s application and

ordered him removed to Mexico. The IJ found that Martinez-Bravo failed to demonstrate that his

removal would result in the requisite hardship to his family. 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D). On appeal,

the BIA dismissed the case on the sole ground that Martinez-Bravo failed to establish the requisite

hardship.

The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of *

Kentucky, sitting by designation.
No. 11-4065

- 2 -

Generally, the Attorney General has discretion to cancel the removal of a non-permanent

resident alien if, among other things, the alien “establishes that removal would result in exceptional

and extremely unusual hardship” to a qualifying relative. 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D). Although

federal courts are divested of jurisdiction to review decisions concerning cancellation of removal, 

8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(I), an alien may seek judicial review of constitutional claims or questions

of law. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D). An alien may also seek judicial review of a claim that the BIA

departed from its own precedent in denying discretionary relief. Ettienne v. Holder, 659 F.3d 513,

517 (6th Cir. 2011).

Martinez-Bravo claims that the BIA departed from its own precedent in dismissing his

appeal. He asks us to compare the facts of his case with those of the precedential decisions cited by

the BIA. Although a claim of departure from agency precedent is subject to judicial review, we lack

“jurisdiction over claims that can be evaluated only by engaging in head-to-head comparisons

between the facts of the petitioner’s case and those of precedential decisions.” Id. at 518. 

Martinez-Bravo also claims that the BIA violated his due process rights by finding that he

failed to demonstrate the requisite hardship. However, Martinez-Bravo has no protected liberty

interest in obtaining discretionary relief. Ukpabi v. Mukasey, 525 F.3d 403, 408 (6th Cir. 2008). 

The petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
# C_2009041EN.01000801.xml

| 19.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/8

---

Adoption of a reference document for the purpose of Council Directive 2008/1/EC concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (1)

1

(2009/C 41/04)

On 3 February 2009, the Commission adopted the complete text of the reference document on best available techniques for energy efficiency.

This document is available on the Internet site: http://eippcb.jrc.es

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2008, p. 8.

1

---
#### STATE v. COPELAND

No. 267P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 467.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 June 1982.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Civil No. 5:09cv302-RS/AK

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT

1656 BRICKYARD ROAD,

CHIPLEY, FLORIDA, WITH

ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND 

APPURTENANCES THEREON

 /

DECREE OF FORFEITURE

Before me is the Government’s Motion for Decree of Forfeiture (Doc. 15). Ifind as follows:

1. On September 3, 2009, a Verified Complaint of Forfeiture In Rem against the

defendant property, 1656 Brickyard Road, Chipley, Florida, with all improvements and

appurtenances thereon, was filed on behalf of the United States of America. The Complaint alleges

that the defendant property is forfeitable to the United States of America pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §

981(a)(1).

2. A Notice of Forfeiture Action was published on an official government Internet site,

www.forfeiture.gov, for 30 consecutive days beginning October 22, 2009, pursuant to Rule G

(a)(4)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules of Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture

Actions.

3. The facts set out in the Declaration (Doc. 15-1) filed bythe United States demonstrate

sufficient grounds for forfeiture of the real property.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The claim filed by Dr. Muhammad Siddiqui shall be recognized. Upon sale, the
United States of America shall issue a check for $25,000.00 from the proceeds made payable to

Alvin Peters and Muhammad Siddiqui, 25 East 8 Street, Panama City FL 32401. th

2. The right, title, and interest to the property located at 1656 Brickyard Road, Chipley,

Florida, more specificallydescribed in Exhibit A, with all improvements and appurtenances thereon,

is condemned, forfeited, and vested in the United States of America, and no right, title, or interest

in the property shall exist in any other party, other than claimant Dr. Muhammad Siddiqui.

3. The defendant property shall be disposed of according to the law.

ORDERED on April 26, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2
Exhibit “A”

Parcel #00000000-00-2072-0008, Chipley, Florida, more particularly described as: Commencing

at the NW corner of the SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of Section 8, Township 4 North, Range 13

West, Washington County, Florida; thence run S89E22'30" E 660.0 feet; thence run S00E24'40"E

215.82 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continue S00E24'30"E 121.48 feet; thence

N89E28'30"W 335.70 feet; thence N00E13'30"W 120.88 feet; thence S89E34'30"E 335.30 feet to

the Point of Beginning.

3
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NanoTech Entertainment, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
DeKett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Robert DeKettName:  Robert
      DeKettTitle:   Chief Executive
      OfficerDate:   May
      24, 2010
# C_2010201EN.01000401.xml

| 23.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 July 2010

2010/C 201/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2850 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4519 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84280 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4495 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3418 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9750 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,179 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 283,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7089 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0974 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2670 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9591 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4476 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3388 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9889 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7835 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7648 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 547,45 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6863 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7123 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2485 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 634,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1204 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,756 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,1355 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,486 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2765 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4462 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,5700 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2850

JPY

Japanese yen

111,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4519

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84280

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4495

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3418

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9750

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,179

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

283,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7089

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0974

RON

Romanian leu

4,2670

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9591

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4476

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3388

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9889

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7835

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7648

KRW

South Korean won

1 547,45

ZAR

South African rand

9,6863

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7123

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2485

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 634,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1204

PHP

Philippine peso

59,756

RUB

Russian rouble

39,1355

THB

Thai baht

41,486

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2765

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4462

INR

Indian rupee

60,5700

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JAMES M. ROWCLIFF, III,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv282/RS-EMT

LUTHER J. RONGSTAD,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Joint Motion To Extend Discovery (Doc. 25). The motion does not

provide any reason why discovery will not be completed by the February 28, 2011,

deadline.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The discovery deadline is extended, and all discovery shall be completed not

later than March 25, 2011.

2. All other deadlines dependent upon the discovery deadline are extended

accordingly.

ORDERED on February 24, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

FORM OF 
 CERTIFICATE OF
CONVERSION 
 CONVERTING 

CONSTELLATION ENERGY PARTNERS LLC, 

(A Delaware Limited Liability Company) 

TO 
 SANCHEZ PRODUCTION
PARTNERS LP 
 (A Delaware Limited Partnership) 

Pursuant to Section 17-217 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, 

6 Del. C. §§ 17-101 et seq. (the “Delaware LP Act”) 

This Certificate of Conversion is being filed for the purpose of converting Constellation Energy Partners LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the “Converting Entity”), to a Delaware limited partnership to be named “Sanchez Production Partners LP” (the “Limited Partnership”). 

The undersigned, being an authorized person of the Converting Entity, does hereby certify as follows: 

 

	1.	Date and Jurisdiction of Formation of Converting Entity. The date the Converting Entity was first formed is February 7, 2005, and the jurisdiction where the Converting Entity was first formed, which
jurisdiction has not changed, is Delaware. 

  

	2.	Name and Type of Converting Entity. The name of the Converting Entity when first formed and immediately prior to filing this Certificate of Conversion is “Constellation Energy Partners LLC”. The
Converting Entity was a Delaware limited liability company immediately prior to filing this Certificate of Conversion. 

  

	3.	Name of Continuing Limited Partnership. The name of the Delaware limited partnership to which the Converting Entity is being converted and the name set forth in the Certificate of Limited Partnership of the
Limited Partnership filed in accordance with Section 17-217(b) of the Delaware LP Act is “Sanchez Production Partners LP”. 

  

	4.	Effective Time. This Certificate of Conversion shall become effective on             , 2014, at
                 .m. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned, being an authorized person of the Converting Entity, has duly executed this Certificate of Conversion as of                      ,
2014. 
  

	
	   

	Name:
	Authorized Person
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 11 Filed 12/06/10 Page 1 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 11 Filed 12/06/10 Page 2 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 11 Filed 12/06/10 Page 3 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 11 Filed 12/06/10 Page 4 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 11 Filed 12/06/10 Page 5 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 11 Filed 12/06/10 Page 6 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 11 Filed 12/06/10 Page 7 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 11 Filed 12/06/10 Page 8 of 8
# C_2009280EN.01000301.xml

| 20.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5512 — Electrabel/E.ON)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 280/02

On 16 October 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5512. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5512. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets of commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, Endocrinology and Metabolism.                    

*Date:*                         December 5, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ann A. Jerkins, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6154, MSC 7892, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-4514,                         *jerkinsa@csr.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893 National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 14, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5778  Filed 11-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Eagle Broadband, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, H. Dean Cubley, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/S/
_______________________________________
H. Dean Cubley, Chief Executive Officer
December 16, 2002
IB 

Union Calendar No. 613 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5174 

[Report No. 115–793] 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with respect to 

functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2018 

Mr. WALBERG (for himself and Mr. RUSH) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

JUNE 28, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5174 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act with 

respect to functions assigned to Assistant Secretaries, 

and for other purposes. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5174 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Energy Emergency 

5 Leadership Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO ASSISTANT SECRE7 TARIES. 

8 Subsection (a) of section 203 of the Department of 

9 Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7133(a)) is amended 

10 by adding at the end the following new paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(12) Energy emergency and energy security 

12 functions, including— 

13 ‘‘(A) responsibilities with respect to infra14 structure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, sup15 ply, and emergency planning, coordination, re16 sponse, and restoration; and 

17 ‘‘(B) upon request of a State, local, or 

18 tribal government or energy sector entity, and 

19 in consultation with other Federal agencies as 

20 appropriate, provision of technical assistance, 

21 support, and response capabilities with respect 

22 to energy security threats, risks, and inci23 dents.’’. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 613 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5174 

[Report No. 115–793] 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization 

ant Secretaries, and for other purposes. Act with respect to functions assigned to AssistJUNE 28, 2018 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS