Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Notices 61371 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

30-Day Notice of Submission to the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB); Opportunity for Public 

Comment 

AGENCY: Department of the Interior, 

National Park Service. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: Under provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and 5 

CFR part 1320, Reporting and 

Recordkeeping Requirements, the 

National Park Service (NPS) requested 

and received emergency approval on the 

collection of information; Interagency 

Access Pass Application Process (OMB 

#1024–0252), which expires on October 

31, 2007. The NPS invites public 

comments on the extension of this 

currently approved collection. 

DATES: Public comments on this 

Information Collection Request (ICR) 

will be accepted on or before November 

29, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

directly to the Desk Officer for the 

Department of the Interior (OMB #1024–

0252), Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, OMB, by fax at (202) 

395–6566, or by electronic mail at 

oira_docket@omb.eop.gov. Please also 

send a copy of your comments to 

Brandon Flint, NPS, WASO Recreation 

Fee Program Office, 1849 C St., NW., 

(2608), Washington, DC 20240; or by email at brandon_flint@nps.gov., or by 

fax at (202) 371–2401. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brandon Flint, NPS, WASO Recreation 

Fee Program Office, 1849 C St., NW., 

(2608), Washington, DC 20240; phone 

(202) 513–7096; e-mail: 

brandon_flint@nps.gov., or by fax at 

(202) 371–2401. 

Comments Received on the 60-Day 

Federal Register Notice: The NPS 

published the 60-Day Federal Register 

Notice to solicit comments on this ICR 

on May 25, 2007 (Vol. 72, pages 29351–

29352). The comment period ended on 

July 24, 2007. There were no public 

comments received as a result of 

publishing this notice. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: The Interagency Access Pass 

Application Process. 

Bureau Form Number: None. 

OMB Number: 1024–0252. 

Expiration Date: 10/31/2007. 

Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved information 

collection. 

Description of Need: The currently 

approved information collection 

responds to The Federal Lands 

Recreation Enhancement Act (FLREA) 

which requires the Secretary of 

Agriculture and the Secretary of the 

Interior to make the America the 

Beautiful—The National Parks and 

Federal Recreational Lands Pass 

available, for free, to any United States 

citizen or person domiciled in the 

United States who has been medically 

determined to be permanently disabled 

for purposes of section 7(20)(B)(i) of the 

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 

705 (20)(B)(i)). The Act further requires 

that the applicant provide adequate 

proof of the disability and such 

citizenship or residency. The Act 

specifies that the Pass shall be valid for 

the lifetime of the pass holder. The 

America the Beautiful—The National 

Parks and Federal Recreational Lands 

Access Pass (Interagency Access Pass) 

was crated to meet the requirements of 

the FLREA. An Interagency Access Pass 

is a free, lifetime permit that is issued 

without charge by the Bureau of Land 

Management, Bureau of Reclamation, 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service, 

United States Forest Service, and the 

National Park Service to citizens or 

persons who are domiciled (permanent 

residents) in the United States, 

regardless of age, and who have a 

medical determination and 

documentation of permanent disability. 

Furthermore, the Pass is nontransferable 

and entitles the permittee and any 

person accompanying him in a single, 

private, non-commercial vehicle, or 

alternatively, the permittee and three 

adults to enter with him where entry to 

the area is by any means other than 

private, non-commercial vehicle. The 

Pass must be signed by the holder. 

In order to issue the Interagency 

Access Pass only to persons who have 

been medically determined to be 

permanently disabled, in accordance 

with the FLREA direction, and in order 

to clarify, simplify, and provide uniform 

guidance for the public on the process 

for obtaining the Interagency Access 

Pass, the Secretaries of Agriculture and 

Interior established eligibility and 

required documentation guidelines for 

issuing the Interagency Access Pass and 

published them within the America the 

Beautiful—The National Parks and 

Federal Recreational Lands Pass 

Standard Operating Procedures. The 

procedures require the individual to 

appear in person and sign the Pass in 

the presence of the issuing agency 

officer. Acceptable documentation to 

verify that the individual had been 

medically determined to have a 

permanent disability includes: 

A statement signed by a licensed 

physician attesting that the applicant 

has a permanent physical, mental, or 

sensory impairment that substantially 

limits one or more major life activities, 

and stating the nature of the 

impairment; Or 

A document issued by a Federal 

agency, such as the Veteran’s 

Administration, which attests that the 

applicant has been medically 

determined to be eligible to receive 

Federal benefits as a result of blindness 

or permanent disability. Other 

acceptable Federal agency documents 

include proof of receipt of Social 

Security Disability Income (SSDI) or 

Supplemental Security Income (SSI); Or 

A document issued by a State agency 

such as the vocational rehabilitation 

agency, which attests that the applicant 

has been medically determined to be 

eligible to receive vocational 

rehabilitation agency benefits or 

services as a result of medically 

determined blindness or permanent 

disability. Showing a State motor 

vehicle department disability sticker, 

license plate or hang tag is not 

acceptable documentation; 

Information available to the general 

public through agency Web sites and 

publications will inform potential Pass 

applicants of the documentation 

requirements. However, there are 

instances where applicants learn about 

the Pass when arriving at a recreation 

site and do not have the required 

documentation available. For those 

instances, a fourth option is available. If 

a person claims eligibility for the Access 

Pass, but cannot produce any of the 

documentation outlined, that person 

must read, sign, and date the Statement 

of Permanent Disability Form in the 

presence of the officer issuing the Pass. 

If the applicant cannot read and/or sign, 

someone else may read, date, and sign 

the statement on his/her behalf in the 

applicant’s presence and in the presence 

of the officer issuing the Pass. The 

Interagency Access Pass replaces the 

Golden Access Passport that was 

established in 1980 by an amendment to 

the Land and Water Conservation Fund 

Act (L&WCFA) of 1965. Previously 

issued Golden Access Passports will 

remain valid for the lifetime of the 

Passport holder. The requested 

information and Statement of 

Permanent Disability have been 

collected and used since the creation of 

the Golden Access Passport in 1980 to 

verify that the individual had been 

medically determined to have a 

permanent disability for the issuance of 

the Golden Access Passport under OMB 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
61372 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 30, 2007 / Notices 

1 19 U.S.C. 1675 (b). 

2 72 FR 40896. 

3See Gray Portland Cement and Cement Clinker 

from Mexico, 66 FR 657400 (December 20, 2001). 

control number 0596–0173, under the 

authority of the L&WCFA. 

Comments are invited on: (1) The 

practical utility of the information being 

gathered; (2) the accuracy of the burden 

hour estimate; (3) ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected; and (4) 

ways to minimize the burden to 

respondents, including use of 

automated information collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology. Before including your 

address, phone number, e-mail address, 

or other personal identifying 

information in your comment, you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment—including your personal 

identifying information—may be made 

publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask OMB in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that OMB will be able 

to do so. 

Description of respondents: United 

States citizens or persons domiciled in 

the United States who have been 

medically determined to be 

permanently disabled for the purposes 

of Section 7(20)(B)(i) of the 

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 

705(20)(B)(i)). 

Estimated average number of 

respondents: 73,400 per year. 

Estimated average number of 

responses: 73,400 per year. 

Estimated average time burden per 

respondent: 5 minutes. 

Frequency of response: Once per 

respondent. 

Estimated total annual reporting 

burden: 6,117 hours. 

Dated: October 24, 2007. 

Leonard E. Stowe, 

NPS, Information Collection Clearance 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 07–5389 Filed 10–29–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–53–M 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Certain Orange Juice From Brazil; 

Dismissal of Request for Institution of 

a Section 751(b) Review Investigation 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Dismissal of a request to 

institute a section 751(b) investigation 

concerning the Commission’s 

affirmative determination in 

investigation No. 731–TA–1089 (Final), 

Certain Orange Juice from Brazil. 

SUMMARY: The Commission determines, 

pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(b)) and 

Commission rule 207.45, that the 

subject request does not show changed 

circumstances sufficient to warrant 

institution of an investigation to review 

in less than 24 months the 

Commission’s final affirmative 

determination in investigation No. 731–

TA–1089 (Final). Certain orange juice is 

provided for in subheadings 2009.12.25, 

2009.12.45, and 2009.19.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Diane J. Mazur (202–205–3184; 

diane.mazur@usitc.gov), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this matter may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

Background Information: On January 

6, 2006, the Department of Commerce 

determined that imports of certain 

orange juice from Brazil are being sold 

in the United States at less than fair 

value (LTFV) within the meaning of 

section 731 of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673) 

(71 FR 2183, January 13, 2006); and on 

March 3, 2006, the Commission 

determined, pursuant to section 

735(b)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1673d(b)(1)), that an industry in the 

United States was materially injured by 

reason of imports of such LTFV 

merchandise. Accordingly, Commerce 

ordered that antidumping duties be 

imposed on such imports (71 FR 12183, 

March 9, 2006). 

On June 13, 2007, the Commission 

received a request to review its 

affirmative determination in 

investigation No. 731–TA–1089 (Final) 

pursuant to section 751(b) of the Act (19 

U.S.C. 1675(b)). The request was filed 

by Tropicana Products, Inc., Bradenton, 

FL. Tropicana alleges that shortfalls in 

the Florida juice orange crop and 

depleted inventories; significant price 

increases and a greatly constricted 

supply; and disruption of the alternative 

sources of Brazilian supply following 

imposition of the antidumping duty 

order have resulted in the domestic 

orange juice producers being harmed by 

the order. 

Pursuant to section 207.45(b) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure,1 the Commission published 

a notice in the Federal Register on July 

25, 2007,2 requesting comments as to 

whether the changed circumstances 

alleged by the petitioner were sufficient 

to warrant an investigation to review in 

less than 24 months the Commission’s 

final affirmative determination. On 

September 24, 2007, the Commission 

received comments in support of the 

request from: (1) Counsel on behalf of 

Tropicana, the party requesting the 

review; (2) counsel on behalf of Louis 

Dreyfus Citrus Inc. (‘‘Louis Dreyfus’’), a 

domestic packager, merchant, and 

manufacturer of orange juice; (3) 

counsel on behalf of Cutrale Citrus 

Juices, Inc., a U.S. producer; Citrus 

Products, Inc., a U.S. importer; and 

Sucocitrico Cutrale Lta., a Brazilian 

exporter (collectively, ‘‘Cutrale Citrus’’); 

(4) counsel on behalf of Fischer S/A 

Agroindustria, a Brazilian producer, and 

Citrosuco North America, Inc., a U.S. 

producer/importer, (collectively, 

‘‘Fischer’’); (5) Silver Springs Citrus, 

Inc., a U.S. producer; (6) Cargill Juice 

N.A., a U.S. producer/importer; and, (7) 

Vitality Foodservice, Inc., a U.S. 

purchaser. 

A joint response in opposition to the 

request was received from counsel on 

behalf of Florida Citrus Mutual 

(‘‘FCM’’), A. Duda & Sons, Inc. (doing 

business as ‘‘Citrus Belle’’), Citrus 

World, Inc., and Southern Garden Citrus 

Processing Corporation (doing business 

as ‘‘Southern Gardens’’) (collectively, 

‘‘domestic producers’’). 

Analysis: In considering whether to 

institute a review investigation under 

section 751(b), the Commission will not 

institute such an investigation unless it 

is persuaded there is sufficient 

information demonstrating: 

(1) that there are significant changed 

circumstances from those in existence at 

the time of the original investigations, 

(2) that those changed circumstances 

are not the natural and direct result of 

the imposition of the antidumping and/ 

or countervailing duty order, and 

(3) that the changed circumstances, 

allegedly indicating that revocation of 

the order would not be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury to the domestic industry, warrant 

a full investigation.3 Additionally, in 

the case of determinations issued less 

than 24 months before the request for a 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES