alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HALL v. HALL

No. 11 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 379.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 April 1980.
# C_2009225EN.01000501.xml

| 18.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 September 2009

2009/C 225/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4712 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4414 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89050 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1134 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5187 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6265 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,094 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,61 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7032 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1245 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2600 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1650 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6863 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5672 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4021 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0708 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0832 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 772,13 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,8334 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0431 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2883 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 265,77 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1058 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,247 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,6026 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,602 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6568 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,4178 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,8460 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4712

JPY

Japanese yen

134,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4414

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89050

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1134

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5187

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6265

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,094

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,61

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7032

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1245

RON

Romanian leu

4,2600

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1650

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6863

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5672

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4021

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0708

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0832

KRW

South Korean won

1 772,13

ZAR

South African rand

10,8334

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0431

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2883

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 265,77

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1058

PHP

Philippine peso

70,247

RUB

Russian rouble

44,6026

THB

Thai baht

49,602

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6568

MXN

Mexican peso

19,4178

INR

Indian rupee

70,8460

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1179

RUFUS PLEASANT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WILLIAM J. HENDERSON, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-99-1459-A) Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 2, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Rufus Pleasant, Appellant Pro Se. Joel Eric Wilson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rufus Pleasant appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this employment discriminationaction. On appeal, Pleasant challenges the district court’s conclusion that his action was barred by res judicata, asserting that the voluntary dismissal with prejudice of his first action was not an adjudication on the merits. We have reviewed the record, the district court’s order, and the transcript of the January 7, 2000,hearing on the motion for summary judgment that contains the district court’s reasoning. We agree with the district court that the disposition of Pleasant’s first suit was an adjudication on the merits. See Schwarz v. Folloder , 767 F.2d 125, 129 (5th Cir. 1985). In his informal brief, Pleasant also makes various malpractice allegations against his attorney, who also represented him in the first action. Pleasant’s malpractice claim is not a basis for invalidating the district court's order. See Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv. , 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pleasant v. Henderson, No. CA-99-1459-A (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 2000).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 246 

To block the implementation of certain presidential actions that restrict 

individuals from certain countries from entering the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2019 

Mr. MURPHY (for himself, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mrs. MURRAY, Ms. HARRIS, Mrs. 

GILLIBRAND, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. COONS, Ms. WARREN, Mr. 

WHITEHOUSE, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. 

CARPER, Mr. UDALL, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Ms. BALDWIN, 

Mr. BENNET, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. REED, Mr. 

WYDEN, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. BROWN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Ms. HASSAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To block the implementation of certain presidential actions 

that restrict individuals from certain countries from entering the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds that Executive Order 13780 and the 

5 presidential proclamation issued on September 24, 2017— 

6 (1) contravene the intent of Congress in enact7 ing section 202(a)(1) of the Immigration and NaVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:28 Feb 01, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S246.IS S246

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 246 IS

1 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(a)(1)), which states, 

2 ‘‘no person shall receive any preference or priority or 

3 be discriminated against in the issuance of an immi4 grant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nation5 ality, place of birth, or place of residence’’; and 

6 (2) violate the Establishment Clause of the 

7 First Amendment to the United States Constitution 

8 and the equal protection component of the Due 

9 Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the 

10 United States Constitution. 

11 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST USE OF FUNDS. 

12 No funds, resources, or fees made available to the 

13 Secretary of Homeland Security, or to any other official 

14 of a Federal agency by any Act of Congress for any fiscal 

15 year, may be used to implement or enforce— 

16 (1) Executive Order 13780, signed on March 6, 

17 2017; or 

18 (2) Presidential Proclamation 9645, issued on 

19 September 24, 2017. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2009028EN.01000601.xml

| 4.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/6

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

2,00 % on 1 February 2009

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 February 2009

(2009/C 28/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2849 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,02 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,453 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,9029 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7506 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4898 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,039 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,398 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 299,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7014 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5495 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3065 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1138 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 2,0113 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6058 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9629 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,5418 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9456 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 785,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0019 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7891 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4047 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 001,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6507 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,22 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 46,5075 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,927 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9841 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6413 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,189 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2849

JPY

Japanese yen

115,02

DKK

Danish krone

7,453

GBP

Pound sterling

0,9029

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7506

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4898

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,039

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

28,398

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

299,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7014

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5495

RON

Romanian leu

4,3065

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1138

AUD

Australian dollar

2,0113

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6058

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9629

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,5418

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9456

KRW

South Korean won

1 785,41

ZAR

South African rand

13,0019

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7891

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4047

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 001,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6507

PHP

Philippine peso

61,22

RUB

Russian rouble

46,5075

THB

Thai baht

44,927

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9841

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6413

INR

Indian rupee

62,189

---

(1)

1

Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
# C_2010057EN.01000901.xml

| 9.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5730 — Telefonica/Hansenet Telekommunikation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 57/04

On 29 January 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5730. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5730. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MANUEL EVERETT ALVAREZ,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-00001-RH-GRJ

DANIEL GROVER, et al,

Defendants.

_

____________________________/

O R D E R

Defendants have filed a Motion for an Order Regarding Address of Unserved

Defendant. (Doc. 41). Service was returned un-executed on Defendant Richard

Patterson with the notation that he has retired from the Florida Department of

Corrections (DOC). (Doc. 39). Defendants have learned that the DOC has a

forwarding address for Defendant Patterson, but the Department requires an Order

before it will provide the address to the Court.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

Defendants’ Motion for an Order Regarding Address of Unserved Defendant

(Doc. 41) is GRANTED, and the Florida Department of Corrections shall within twenty

(20) days of this date provide the home address for Defendant Richard Patterson to the

Court by filing a Notice under seal in this case. The Notice should be filed with the

Clerk of Court and be clearly marked in the style of the case “TO BE FILED UNDER 
Page 2 of 2

SEAL,” with this Order attached. The address will be kept confidential and forwarded

by the Court for personal service upon Defendant Patterson by the United States

Marshal. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 14 day of December 2010. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 5:10-cv-00001-RH -GRJ
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JOSE ORTIZ RODRIGUEZ,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00143-MP -GRJ

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KATHLEEN L FURHAM,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 14, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, which recommends that plaintiff’s complaint, Doc. 1, be dismissed without

prejudice for failure to comply with court orders and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has not

objected to the recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it

is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 14, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint, Doc. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of April, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00143-MP-GRJ Document 15 Filed 04/26/11 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0345 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JUDSON LEE BROWN,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including May 20, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 14 2022

04/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0345
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 7067

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,

v. RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN , Defendant

- Appell ant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar , Chief District Judge. ( 1:15

- cr - 00462

- JKB

- 2 )

Submitted : January 18, 2024 Decided: February 16, 2024

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Fitzgerald Aubin, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-7067 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. United States v. Aigbekaen , No. 1:15

- cr - 00462

- JKB

- 2 (D. Md. Aug. 4, 2023). We deny his motions for bail or release pending appeal and for “all transcripts from the lower court

. ” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-7067 Doc: 15 Filed: 02/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5215 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to prohibit employees found to have knowingly misused Department of Veterans Affairs purchase cards from serving as purchase card 

holders or approving officials. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2018 

Mr. BERGMAN (for himself, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. BOST, and Mr. 

DUNN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to prohibit employees found 

to have knowingly misused Department of Veterans Affairs purchase cards from serving as purchase card holders or approving officials. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Affairs Pur5 chase Card Misuse Mitigation Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5215 IH

1 SEC. 2. MISUSE OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 

2 PURCHASE CARDS BY DEPARTMENT EMPLOY3 EES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 727. Misuse of Department purchase cards 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall prohibit any 

9 employee of the Department who the Secretary or the In10 spector General of the Department determines has know11 ingly misused a purchase card from serving as a purchase 

12 card holder or approving official. Such a prohibition shall 

13 be in addition to any other applicable penalty. 

14 ‘‘(b) MISUSE.—For purposes of this section, the term 

15 ‘misuse’ means— 

16 ‘‘(1) splitting purchases; 

17 ‘‘(2) exceeding applicable purchase card limits 

18 or purchase thresholds; 

19 ‘‘(3) purchasing any unauthorized item; 

20 ‘‘(4) using a purchase card without being an 

21 authorized purchase card holder; or 

22 ‘‘(5) violating ethics standards.’’. 

23 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

24 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 


srobinson on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5215 IH

1 after the item relating to section 725 the following new 

2 item: 

‘‘727. Misuse of Department purchase cards.’’. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
atel_Ex4_1


		
			Exhibit 4.1
		

		
			DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY MEMBERSHIP INTEREST (“UNITS”)
		

		
			Fast Act Exhibit 4(vi) “Description of registrant’s securities”
		

		
			Summary
		

		
			The following description summarizes certain important terms of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund X, LLC’s (the “Company”) membership interests (the “Units”). This description summarizes the provisions that are included in the Company’s Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”).  This summary will not provide all the information relevant to the Units. For a complete description of the Units,  please refer to the applicable provisions of Company’s  Operating Agreement and relevant California governing law.
		

		
			Outstanding Units
		

		
			13,971,486 Units have been subscribed by the members of the Company as of December 31, 2019.
		

		
			General
		

		
			Liquidity. The Units were offered and sold pursuant to registration under the Securities Act of 1933, and subsequently registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  However, the Units are subject to significant restriction on transferability in order to preserve the tax characterization of the Company and tax consequences for Unit holders.  Accordingly, the Units are not traded on any securities exchange and have limited liquidity.  Please review the rights of Unit holders for transfer of shares under the Operating Agreement.
		

		
			Voting Rights. The holders of Units are entitled to one vote per share on any matter to be voted upon by holders of Units in the Company’s Operating Agreement. Certain rights may only be exercised upon receiving at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by Unit holders
		

		
			Distributions. The holders of Units are entitled to distributions on a pro rata basis, if, as, and when distributed by the Manager.
		

		
			Other Rights. No holder of Units has any priority or preemptive right as to the Units.
		

		
			Dissolution and Winding Up. Upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the Unit holders are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of creditors.
		

		
			Transfer Agent and Registrar. The transfer agent and registrar of the Units is Conduent Inc.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5636]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting for EAC Board of Advisors.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. and 
Thursday, December 13, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. and Friday, December 14, 
2007, 8:30 a.m.-12 p.m.

Place: Omni Hotel Downtown, 700 San Jacinto Boulevard at 8th Street, 
Austin, TX 78701, Phone number (512) 476-3700.

Purpose: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Board of 
Advisors, as required by the Help America Vote Act of 2002, will meet 
to consider and receive presentations on the proposed next iteration of 
the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), as were submitted to EAC 
from the commission's Technical Guidelines Development Committee 
(TGDC). The Board of Advisors will formulate recommendations to EAC 
regarding the guidelines and consider other administrative matters. The 
EAC Standards Board will meet at the same time and some of the Board of 
Advisors sessions will be held jointly with the Standards Board.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-
3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-5636 Filed 11-7-07; 4:24 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M