alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / Presidential Documents 61041 

Presidential Determination No. 2008–5 of October 19, 2007 

Presidential Determination Relating to Assistance for Saudi 

Arabia 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws 

of the United States, including section 582 of the Foreign Operations, Export 

Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109– 

102), and that section as carried forward by the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Public Law 110–5), and the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2008 (Public Law 110–92), I hereby certify that Saudi 

Arabia is cooperating with efforts to combat international terrorism and 

that the proposed assistance will help facilitate that effort, and hereby waive 

the application of such sections. 

You are authorized and directed to report this certification to the Congress 

and publish it in the Federal Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, October 19, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–5372 

Filed 10–25–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JAMES TAYLOR,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv151-RH/EMT

WARDEN ELLIS et al.,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 6. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is DISMISSED

without prejudice for failure to abide by an order of the court and failure to

prosecute.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on October 6, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *





I, George
Critz, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shatrusen, Inc. for the quarter ended June
30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Shatrusen, Inc.





Date:
      August 12, 2009
              By:
              /s/George Critz,
      Jr.George
      Critz, Jr., President,Principal
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
|          (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|          (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |   |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Peter Mark      Smyth         |   |   |   |   |
| P M Smyth      July      14, 2009 |   |   |   |   |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2014

h1217 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2014

149332

PHIL FORNER,

Appellant,

v SC: 149332

COA: 317298

Ottawa CC: 12

- 002922

- AA

ALLENDALE CHARTER TOWNSHIP,

Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we a re not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHERI BUSCEMI, etc.,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO: 3:10cv00078/RV/EMT

 

THE KROGER CO. OF OHIO and

JUNIOR FOOD STORES OF WEST

FLORIDA, INC., etc.,

Defendants.

rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrB

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court having been advised on August 16, 2010, that this matter has been

compromised and settled between the parties, it is ORDERED:

(1) This cause is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice and without taxation of costs. 

(2) In the event settlement is not consummated for any reason, the Court reserves

the power, upon motion filed by any party within 120 days after date, to amend, alter or

vacate and set aside this order of dismissal. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2010.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The Board of Directors


Oilsands Quest Inc.







We consent to the incorporation by reference in the post-effective amendment no. 2 to the registration statement on Form S-1 (no. 333-162023) and the registration statements on Form S-8 (nos. 333-145079 and 333-135366) of Oilsands Quest Inc. of our reports dated July 12, 2010 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company (a development stage company) as of April 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2010 and the information included in the cumulative from inception presentations for the period from May 1, 2007 to April 30, 2010 (not separately presented), and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2010, which reports appear in amendment no. 1 to the April 30, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company.








/s/ KPMG LLP




Calgary, Canada


July 21, 2010






EX-1
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A1 38 1 . FRED BROOKS v

. THE STATE.

Fred Bro ok s was co n vi ct ed o f m al i ce m u rd er, an d t h e t ri al co u rt d en i ed h i s

m o ti o n fo r n ew t ri al

. Bro o k s t h en fi l ed a d i rect ap p eal
, wh i ch h as b een d o ck et ed in

t h i s Co u rt

. U n d e r o u r C o n s t i t u t i o n , t h e S u p r e m e C o u r t h a s a p p e l l a t e j u r i s d i c t i o n o v e r

“ [a] l l cas es i n w h i ch a sen ten ce o f d eat h was i m p o s ed o r co u l d b e i m

p o s ed .” See Ga.
Co n s t

. of 19 8 3
, A rt

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8 ). Becau s e a p en al t y o f d e a t h can b e i m p o s ed fo r t h e cri m e o f m urd er, ju r i s d i ct i o n i s p ro p er i n t he Su p rem e Co u rt

. See
OCGA § 1 7 -1 0 -3 0 (b ); Nea l v. S t a t e , 29 0 G a. 5 6 3
, 5 7 2 (7 22 SE2 d 7 6 5 ) (2 0 1 2 ) (Hu ns t ei n , C. J., co n cu rri n g ); s ee al s o S t a t e v. Th o r n t o n , 2 5 3 Ga. 5 2 4 (1 ) (3 2 2 SE2 d
7 1 1 ) (1 9 84 ) (d i rect in g t hi s Co u rt t o t ran s fer “ al l cas es i n wh ich ei t h er a s en t en ce o f
d eat h o r o f l ife i m

p ri s o n m e n t h as b een i m p o s ed u po n co n vi ct i o n o f m u rd er”).
Acco rd in g ly
, Bro o ks ’ s ap p eal i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s p o s i t i on

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/08/2015 April 08, 2015
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-3384

_____________________________

JOHNATHAN SAMPSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

J. Lee Marsh, Judge.

September 1, 2020

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and David Alan Henson, Megan 

Lynne Long, and Ashley N. Coyle, Assistant Public Defenders, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant; Johnathan Sampson, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2079 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain tribal benefits 

as earned income for purposes of the kiddie tax. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10, 2019 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain tribal benefits as earned income for purposes of 

the kiddie tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PAYMENTS MADE BY INDIAN TRIBAL 

4 GOVERNMENTS TREATED AS EARNED IN5 COME FOR KIDDIE TAX. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1(g)(4)(C) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(C) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN AMOUNTS

9 AS EARNED INCOME.—For purposes of this sub10 section, each of the following amounts shall be 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2079 IS

1 treated as earned income of the child referred 

2 to in paragraph (1) to the extent included in 

3 the gross income of such child: 

4 ‘‘(i) DISTRIBUTIONS FROM QUALIFIED

5 DISABILITY TRUSTS.—Any amount in6 cluded in the gross income of such child 

7 under section 652 or 662 by reason of 

8 being a beneficiary of a qualified disability 

9 trust (as defined in section 

10 642(b)(2)(C)(ii)). 

11 ‘‘(ii) CERTAIN INDIAN TRIBAL PAY12 MENTS.—Any payment which is included 

13 in the gross income of such child and made 

14 by an Indian tribal government (as defined 

15 in section 139E(c)(1)), or from a trust of 

16 which the Indian tribal government is 

17 treated as the owner under subpart E of 

18 part I of subchapter J, to or for the ben19 efit of such child if— 

20 ‘‘(I) such child or a family mem21 ber (within the meaning of section 

22 267(c)(4)) is an enrolled member of 

23 the tribe with respect to such Indian 

24 tribal government, and 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2079 IS

1 ‘‘(II) such payment is made by 

2 reason of such enrollment. 

3 ‘‘(iii) CERTAIN PAYMENTS FROM NA4 TIVE CORPORATIONS OR SETTLEMENT

5 TRUSTS.—Any payment which is included 

6 in the gross income of such child and— 

7 ‘‘(I) made by a Native corpora8 tion (as defined in section 646(h)(2)) 

9 to or for the benefit of such child if 

10 such child or a family member (within 

11 the meaning of section 267(c)(4)) has 

12 an equity interest in the Native cor13 poration, or 

14 ‘‘(II) made by a Settlement 

15 Trust (as defined in section 

16 646(h)(4)) to or for the benefit of 

17 such child if such child or a family 

18 member (within the meaning of sec19 tion 267(c)(4)) has a beneficial inter20 est in such Settlement Trust.’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

22 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

23 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2009198EN.01000301.xml

| 22.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 August 2009

2009/C 198/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4330 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4435 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86570 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1432 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5160 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5550 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,482 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,59 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6998 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1068 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2240 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1324 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7197 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5541 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1074 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1015 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0620 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 788,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2261 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7891 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3083 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 352,49 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0456 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,378 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,3900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,765 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6289 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3954 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,6870 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4330

JPY

Japanese yen

134,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4435

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86570

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1432

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5160

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5550

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,482

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,59

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6998

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1068

RON

Romanian leu

4,2240

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1324

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7197

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5541

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1074

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1015

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0620

KRW

South Korean won

1 788,62

ZAR

South African rand

11,2261

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7891

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3083

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 352,49

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0456

PHP

Philippine peso

69,378

RUB

Russian rouble

45,3900

THB

Thai baht

48,765

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6289

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3954

INR

Indian rupee

69,6870

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. Case No. 4:10cr46-MW/GRJ-1

FRANCO NICHOLAS PADGETT.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Amended 

Report and Recommendation. ECF No. 188. Upon consideration, no objections

having been filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The Amended Motion Under 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal 

Custody, ECF No. 145, is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.”

This Court notes that Mr. Padgett filed a “notice of appeal” on March 13, 2017, 

appealing the denial of his § 2255 motion. ECF No. 189. Presumably, Mr. Padgett 

was appealing the report and recommendation, which is not an appealable order, 

because this Court had not denied his motion at that time. His notice, of course,

does not divest this Court of jurisdiction. This Court only notes the error so Mr. 

Case 4:10-cr-00046-MW-GRJ Document 192 Filed 03/24/17 Page 1 of 2
2

Padgett understands that he needs to file a notice of appeal directed to this order if 

he wishes to appeal the matter to the Eleventh Circuit. The Clerk shall close the 

file. 

SO ORDERED on March 24, 2017.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cr-00046-MW-GRJ Document 192 Filed 03/24/17 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LIBERTY CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE
30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,590,361
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      81,043
<MORTGAGE>                                     238,362
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   59,436
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,092,349
<CASH>                                          25,064
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             280,208
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         337,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,069,267
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,874,189
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  33,916
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           29,126
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                210,396
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           45,182
<PREFERRED>                                     20,999
<COMMON>                                       163,303
<OTHER-SE>                                     426,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,069,267
<PREMIUMS>                                     175,362
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             78,332
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,011
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  70,666
<BENEFITS>                                     116,656
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     21,938
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            73,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,972
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,707
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,265
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.63
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
99.2
 
  Oilsands Quest Inc. th
 Attention:
    
    The Board of Directors of Oilsands Quest Inc.
 Re:
    
    Report on Resource Estimates by Independent Qualified
Resources Evaluator of Oilsands Quest Inc. (the Company)
  1.
    
    We have prepared resource estimates of discovered and undiscovered initially-in-place bitumen
resources on portions of the Companys Axe Lake Discovery and Raven Ridge Discovery as at
April 30, 2008.
 2.
    
    The preparation and disclosure of the resource estimates are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the resource estimates
based on our evaluation.
 We carried out our evaluation in accordance with standards set out in the Canadian Oil and
Gas Evaluation Handbook (the COGE Handbook) prepared jointly by the Society of Petroleum
Evaluation Engineers (Calgary Chapter) and the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy &
Petroleum (Petroleum Society).
 3.
    
    Those standards require that we plan and perform an evaluation to obtain reasonable assurance
as to whether the resource estimates are free of material misstatement. An evaluation also
includes assessing whether the resource estimates are in accordance with principles and
definitions presented in the COGE Handbook.




---



##### 



Oilsands
Quest Inc.
Report on Resource Estimates
    
    Page 2
June 23, 2008
  4.
    
    The following table sets forth the Company share of discovered and undiscovered bitumen
initially-in-place included in the resource estimates of the Company evaluated by us, for
the year ended April 30, 2008.
 (billion bbls of bitumen)
 Axe Lake
    
    
    Raven Ridge
    
    
    TotalDiscovered Resources(Discovered Bitumen Initially-In-Place)Low Estimate (P90)
    
    
    1.241
    
    
    
    0.337
    
    
    
    1.578Best Estimate (P50)
    
    
    1.723
    
    
    
    0.566
    
    
    
    2.289High Estimate (P10)
    
    
    2.334
    
    
    
    0.727
    
    
    
    3.061Undiscovered Resources(Undiscovered Bitumen Initially-In-Place)Low Estimate (P90)
    
    
    n/a
    *
    
    
    0.493
    
    
    
    0.493Best Estimate (P50)
    
    
    n/a
    
    
    
    1.949
    
    
    
    1.949High Estimate (P10)
    
    
    n/a
    
    
    
    3.523
    
    
    
    3.523
  5.
    
    In our opinion, the resource estimates respectively evaluated by us have, in all material
respects, been determined and are in accordance with the COGE Handbook. We express no opinion
on the resource estimates that we reviewed but did not audit or evaluate.
 6.
    
    We have no responsibility to update our report referred to in paragraph 4 for events and
circumstances occurring after the preparation date.
 7.
    
    Because the resource estimates are based on judgments regarding future events, actual results
will vary and the variations may be material.
  MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.
 signed by G. M.
Heath
G. M. Heath, P. Eng.
Vice President