Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 1:10-cr-39-SPM/GRJ

STEPHEN TODD NELSON,

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On this date, the Defendant, Stephen Todd Nelson, his attorney, and the

attorney for the Government appeared before the undersigned for the purpose of

considering Defendant’s entry of a guilty plea to Count One of the Indictment. The

district judge referred this matter to the undersigned for purposes of hearing

Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a

report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties

consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered.

The Court addressed Defendant personally in open court, and after assuring that

Defendant was competent to proceed and had consented to pleading guilty, the Court

finds:

1. Defendant is mentally alert, appears to be reasonably intelligent, and

understands the nature of the charges to which he is pleading guilty as well as the

consequences of a guilty plea.

2. Defendant understands that he has a right to persist in his plea of not guilty, 

to trial by jury, to assistance of counsel at trial, to voluntarily testify and present
Page 2 of 3

evidence in his own defense, to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses, and

that he has a right against compelled self-incrimination.

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence he faces if the guilty

plea is accepted, including the effect of the supervised release term, and he

understands that the sentencing guidelines apply and that the Court may depart from

those guidelines under some circumstances. 

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been freely, knowingly, and

voluntarily made and is not the result of force or threats or of any promises except for

those promises contained in the written plea agreement between the parties. 

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that his answers during the plea colloquy, which were

under oath, may be later used against him in a prosecution for perjury or false

statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant’s guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the district court. 

Defendant understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has made his decision to plead guilty with the advice and counsel

of a competent attorney with whom Defendant acknowledged he was satisfied.

10. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with his plea of guilty

before the undersigned. He understands that he has waived the 14-day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and he agrees that he has 24 hours from

receipt of a copy of this report and recommendation in which to file written objections, if

1:10c-39-SPM/GRJ
Page 3 of 3

any. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the shorter period for

objections.

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the Court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and Defendant’s plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 12 day of October, 2010. th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copyof this report and recommendation.

1:10c-39-SPM/GRJ