alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certifications

I, Richard R. Royall, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eagle Broadband, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting. 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  December 8, 2003


/S/Richard R. Royall
--------------------
Richard R. Royall,
Chief Financial Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-31386

Summary Calendar

 

MASSOOD DANESH PAJOOH,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION

SERVICE; CARL CASTERLINE, Warden,

Respondents-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-2050

--------------------

October 28, 1999

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Massood Danesh Pajooh, federal prisoner #72872-079, appeals

from the district court’s dismissal of his federal habeas

petition for lack of jurisdiction. The respondent has filed a

motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of subject-matter

jurisdiction. The respondent’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED. 

See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g); Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination 

Committee, 119 S. Ct. 936, 943 (1999). All other outstanding

motions are DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### STATE v. HENDRICKS

No. 107 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 245.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 January 1980.
EXHIBT 23.1
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-3 and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-60688, 333-69796, 333-75144,333-98961, 333-89528 and 333-40588) of LendingTree, Inc. of our report datedFebruary 3, 2003 relating to the financial statements, which appears in thisForm 10-K. We also consent to the references to us under the heading “SelectedFinancial Data” in this Form 10-K.
/S/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 25, 2003
# C_2010031EN.01001001.xml

| 9.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5629 — Normeston/MOL/MET JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 31/04

On 11 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5629. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5629. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRIAN CARR,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

STATE OF OREGON; CITY OF

PORTLAND; LINDA MENG, in her

official capacity as City Attorney of the

City of Portland; HARDY MYERS, in his

official capacity as Attorney General of the

State of Oregon,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-35902

D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00398-HA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 11, 2011 ** 

Before: THOMAS, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

FILED

SEP 6 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
Brian P. Carr appeals pro se from the district court’s decision dismissing his

action as barred by the statute of limitations and for lack of subject-matter

jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Reviewing de

novo, Noel v. Hall, 341 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir. 2003), we affirm.

Carr’s complaint in the district court seeks to overturn the state court’s

refusal to seal his arrest record. His suit is barred by the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. 

“If a federal plaintiff asserts as a legal wrong an allegedly erroneous decision by a

state court, and seeks relief from a state court judgment based on that decision,

Rooker-Feldman bars subject matter jurisdiction in federal district court.” Id. at

1164; Worldwide Church of God v. McNair, 805 F.3d 888, 891 (9th Cir. 1986).

Carr also challenges the district court’s refusal to allow him leave to file an

amended complaint. Reviewing for abuse of discretion, Planned Parenthood v.

Neely, 130 F.3d 400, 402 (9th Cir. 1997), we affirm. Carr’s proposed amended

complaint sought to introduce a “separate, distinct and new cause of action,” id.

(internal quotations and citations omitted), and the district court therefore did not

abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend.

Carr’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

VERDELL ROBINSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:09-cv-00357-MP-AK

WALTER MCNEIL,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court On Doc. 18, Petitioner’s “Inquiry,” in which Petitioner

requests information regarding the status of this case and the disposition of Doc. 14,

Respondent’s motion for an extension of time to respond to the Petition. Upon due

consideration, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

That the Clerk is directed to forward Petitioner a copy of the Court’s order, Doc. 15,

granting Respondent’s motion for extension of time, and a copy of the docket sheet.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of March, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 21 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 21 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOHNNIE WILLIAMS,

Petitioner, 

vs. Case No. 3:10cv215/LAC/CJK

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated October 15, 2012. (Doc. 34). The parties have been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed

objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus(doc. 1), challenging the judgment

of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Johnnie Glenn Williams, Jr. in the

Circuit Court for Escambia County, Florida, Case No. 03-5746 is DENIED, and the

clerk is directed to close the file.
Page 2 of 2

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3 day of December, 2012.

rd

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv215LAC/CJK
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STANLEY DELORD MARTIN,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv28/MCR/EMT

WALTER McNEIL,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause is before the court on Respondent’s motion to dismiss the habeas petition as

untimely (Doc. 29). Before the court rules on this motion, Petitioner shall be given an opportunity

to respond.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Petitioner shall file

a response to Respondent’s motion to dismiss. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of October 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Goldrich Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard R. Walters, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrich Mining Company.







/s/ Richard R. Walters

DATE:  August 14, 2009

Richard R. Walters, President





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Goldrich Mining Company and will be retained by Goldrich Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







---
# C_2010099EN.01000302.xml

| 17.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5733 — Gestamp Automocion/Edscha Hinge & Control Systems)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 99/03

On 19 March 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5733. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5733. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MICHAEL P. BRYANT,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09cv278/RS-EMT

CCBCC, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested by Defendant’s Unopposed Motion For Telephonic Appearance

At Mediation By Defendant’s Representative (Doc. 28) is granted.

ORDERED on April 30, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Randy M. Griffin, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Randy M. Griffin


Name:  Randy
M. Griffin


Title:  Chief
Executive Officer


Date:  August
16, 2010
**EXHIBIT 99.1**ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATEBARCLAYS BANK PLCGRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 2) PLC     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Barclays Bank PLC (the “Bank”), asServicer, pursuant to the Beneficiaries Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 23, 1999 (the“Agreement”), among the Bank, as Servicer and Barclaycard Funding PLC, as Investor Beneficiary,does hereby certify that:     1. The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings asset forth in the Agreement.     2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.     3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2005 was conducted under my supervision.     4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreementthroughout such calendar year and no material default in the performance ofsuch obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in theParagraph 5 below.     5. The following is a description of each material default in the performanceof the Servicer’s obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known tothe undersigned to have been made by the Servicer during the calendar yearended December 31, 2005, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each suchdefault, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each suchdefault and (iii) the current status of each such default:     None.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Annual Servicer’s Certificate this23rd day of June, 2006.        Barclays Bank PLC as Servicer  By: /s/ Paul Gerard Turner    **Name:** **Paul Gerard Turner**    **Title:** **Finance Director**      **Barclaycard UK Consumer Finance Division**
- 32 -
# CA2009177EN.01001201.xml

| 30.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 177/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 177/12

---

RESERVE LISTS
   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

1

OPEN COMPETITIONS

OPEN COMPETITIONS

(2009/C 177 A/07)

EPSO/AD/133/08

CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS (AD 5) WITH LITHUANIAN (LT) AS THEIR MAIN LANGUAGE

Option 1

Merit Group 1

| PADOLEVICIUTE | Daina |
| --- | --- |
| URBONAITE | Egle |

PADOLEVICIUTE

Daina

URBONAITE

Egle

Merit Group 2

| ALEKSEICIKAITE | Viktorija |
| --- | --- |

ALEKSEICIKAITE

Viktorija

Option 2

Merit Group 1

| REKLAITYTE | Ausra |
| --- | --- |

REKLAITYTE

Ausra

Merit Group 2

| DVARIONAITE | Jurate |
| --- | --- |
| KILIESAITE | Alina |
| MALASKEVICIUTE (JAKUBKIENE) | Rimante |
| PABURSKYTE (STASIUNIENE) | Zivile |

DVARIONAITE

Jurate

KILIESAITE

Alina

MALASKEVICIUTE (JAKUBKIENE)

Rimante

PABURSKYTE (STASIUNIENE)

Zivile

Option 3

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

EPSO/AD/134/08

CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS (AD 7) WITH LITHUANIAN (LT) AS THEIR MAIN LANGUAGE

Option 1

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

Option 2

Merit Group 1

| KRISTOPAITIS | Raimundas |
| --- | --- |

KRISTOPAITIS

Raimundas

Merit Group 2

| BLAZEVICIUTE | Laura |
| --- | --- |
| MARIJAUSKIENE (RAMANAUSKAITE) | Skirmante |
| MORKUNAS | Gintaras |

BLAZEVICIUTE

Laura

MARIJAUSKIENE (RAMANAUSKAITE)

Skirmante

MORKUNAS

Gintaras

Option 3

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

EPSO/AD/135/08

CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS (AD 5) WITH MALTESE (MT) AS THEIR MAIN LANGUAGE

Option 1

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

Option 2

| VIGAR | Michelle Rita Pauline |
| --- | --- |

VIGAR

Michelle Rita Pauline

Option 3

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

EPSO/AD/136/08

CONFERENCE INTERPRETERS (AD 7) WITH MALTESE (MT) AS THEIR MAIN LANGUAGE

Option 1

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

Option 2

| BAJADA | Vanessa |
| --- | --- |
| MIFSUD | Peter |

BAJADA

Vanessa

MIFSUD

Peter

Option 3

NO SUCCESSFUL CANDIDATE

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2010 and may be extended.

31 December 2010

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2479 

To provide clarification regarding the common or usual name for bison and 

compliance with section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2019 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself, Mr. BENNET, Mr. BRAUN, and Ms. SMITH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide clarification regarding the common or usual name 

for bison and compliance with section 403 of the Federal 

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMMON OR USUAL NAME FOR NORTH AMER4 ICAN BISON. 

5 Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

6 Act (21 U.S.C. 343) is amended by adding at the end the 

7 following: 

8 ‘‘(z)(1) Subject to subparagraph (2), if it is a food 

9 that is or contains any animal in the genus Bubalus and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2479 IS

1 the labeling uses the term ‘buffalo’ as a common or usual 

2 name for the food, unless the term used in the labeling 

3 is ‘water buffalo’. 

4 ‘‘(2) Subparagraph (1) shall not be construed as pro5 hibiting the use of the term ‘buffalo’ as a common or usual 

6 name for the animal Bison bison bison (commonly known 

7 as the plains bison), or the animal Bison bison athabascae 

8 (commonly known as the wood bison).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS