alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5177 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5177

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
    Defense, in awarding a contract for the procurement of goods or 
 services, to give a preference to offerors that employ veterans, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2018

  Mr. Knight (for himself and Mrs. Murphy of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
    Defense, in awarding a contract for the procurement of goods or 
 services, to give a preference to offerors that employ veterans, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Encouraging Veteran Employment Act 
of 2018''.

SEC. 2. PREFERENCE FOR OFFERORS EMPLOYING VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 137 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 2339a. Preference for offerors employing veterans
    ``(a) Preference.--In awarding a contract for the procurement of 
goods or services for the Department of Defense, the head of an agency 
may give a preference to offerors that employ veterans on a full-time 
basis. The Secretary of Defense shall determine such preference based 
on the percentage of the full-time employees of the offeror who are 
veterans.
    ``(b) Enforcement Penalties for Misrepresentation.--(1) If the head 
of an agency determines that an offeror willfully and intentionally 
misrepresented the veteran status of the employees of the offeror in a 
bid submitted under subsection (a), such head of an agency may suspend 
or debar such offeror for a period of not less than five years.
    ``(2) Not later than 30 days after determining that an offeror 
should be suspended or debarred under paragraph (1), the head of an 
agency making such determination shall initiate a suspension or 
debarment proceeding, as applicable, against the offeror. The head of 
an agency shall complete such an action not later than 90 days after 
initiating such action.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
2339 the following new item:

``2339a. Preference for offerors employing veterans.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# AGENCY:

Farm Credit Administration.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration Board (Board). 

*Date and Time:*                         The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on November 8, 2007, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its business.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056. 

# ADDRESSES:

Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This meeting of the Board will be open to the public (limited space available). In order to increase the accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the meeting are: 

## Open Session 

### A. Approval of Minutes 

    - October 11, 2007.

### B. New Business 

    - Final Rule— 12 CFR Part 620 —Annual Report to Shareholders. 

### C. Reports 

    - Office of Management Services Quarterly Report.

Dated: November 2, 2007. 

Roland E. Smith, 

Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board. 

[FR Doc. 07-5584 Filed 11-2-07; 3:21 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
# C_2009272EN.01001002.xml

| 13.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5632 — Pepsico/Pepsi Americas)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 272/04

On 26 October 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5632. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5632. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-7744 RICKY WAYNE BOBLETT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE; LISA EDWARDS; MAJOR PEROTELLI; EDWARD C. MORRIS; MR. CARR, Defendants - Appellees, and LARRY D. HUFFMAN; DAN T. MAHON; GENE JOHNSON, Defendants.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-1009) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 5, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ricky Wayne Boblett, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boblett v. Angelone , No. CA-95-1009 (W.D. Va. Oct. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HANS CHRISTIAN ANDERSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv233-MP/WCS

FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL, 

STATE OF FLORIDA,

and DOCTOR DEGALA,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an order filed August 25,

2010, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint by September 27, 2010. 

Plaintiff was specifically warned that a recommendation would be made that this case

be dismissed if there was a failure to comply with that order. Doc. 14. To date, no

response has been received from the Plaintiff. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.
Page 2 of 2

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, this complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

Plaintiff shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by filing a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on October 20, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv233-MP/WCS
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Guanwei Recycling Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Yang Feng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1. The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and;





2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 16, 2011/s/ Yang FengYang Feng

Chief Financial Officer
# C_2010248EN.01000201.xml

| 15.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 September 2010

2010/C 248/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2850 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 107,04 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4461 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83430 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2260 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2911 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8780 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,563 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 283,76 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7088 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9439 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2355 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9294 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3758 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3199 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9810 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7615 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7195 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 495,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,1879 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6690 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2830 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 519,41 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9935 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,051 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,5570 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,591 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2008 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5471 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,6500 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2850

JPY

Japanese yen

107,04

DKK

Danish krone

7,4461

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83430

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2260

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2911

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8780

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,563

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

283,76

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7088

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9439

RON

Romanian leu

4,2355

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9294

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3758

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3199

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9810

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7615

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7195

KRW

South Korean won

1 495,24

ZAR

South African rand

9,1879

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6690

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2830

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 519,41

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9935

PHP

Philippine peso

57,051

RUB

Russian rouble

39,5570

THB

Thai baht

39,591

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2008

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5471

INR

Indian rupee

59,6500

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the Trust) does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2017 (the Form 10-Q) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|                                                                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                    
|Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                        
|Senior Vice President on behalf of Southwest Bank, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust

Dated: February 14, 2018

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

COTTIE ANN WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00155-SPM -GRJ

STATE FARM MUTUAL 

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion To Restrict The Testimony Of

Dr. Wagdi Faris To The CME Report Of Dr. Wagdi Faris (Doc. 22.) Plaintiff requests

the Court to enter an order limiting the trial testimony of Dr. Wadgi Faris to the opinions

and information contained in his report of the compulsory medical examination of

Plaintoff performed on November 17, 2010. Defendant has filed a response (Doc. 25)

and advises that it does not oppose the relief requested in Plaintiff’s motion. 

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

Plaintiff’s Motion To Restrict The Testimony Of Dr. Wagdi Faris To The CME

Report Of Dr. Wagdi Faris (Doc. 22) is GRANTED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of January, 2011. 

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
# C_2010047EN.01002001.xml

| 25.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/20

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5768 — Klöckner/Becker)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 47/04

On 19 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5768. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5768. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68163-68164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5944]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System.

TIME AND DATE:  12 p.m., Monday, December 10, 2007.

PLACE:  Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building, 20th and C 
Streets, NW., Washington, DC 20551.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
    1. Personnel actions (appointments, promotions, assignments, 
reassignments, and salary actions)

[[Page 68164]]

involving individual Federal Reserve System employees.
    2. Any items carried forward from a previously announced meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Michelle Smith, Director, or Dave 
Skidmore, Assistant to the Board, Office of Board Members at 202-452-
2955.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  You may call 202-452-3206 beginning at 
approximately 5 p.m. two business days before the meeting for a 
recorded announcement of bank and bank holding company applications 
scheduled for the meeting; or you may contact the Board's Web site at 
http://www.federal reserve.gov for an electronic announcement that not 
only lists applications, but also indicates procedural and other 
information about the meeting.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 30, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-5944 Filed 11-30-07; 3:34 pm]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-M
# C_2010224EN.01000101.xml

| 19.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5901 — Montagu/GIP/Greenstar)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 224/01

On 3 August 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5901. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5901. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

THOMAS CLEVELAND WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-83-RS-GRJ

KARLA JO BROCK,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court on Doc. 44, Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s

amended motion for summary judgment for failure to comply with the requirements of

Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and the local rules. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion to

strike. The Court finds that the motion to strike is due to be granted for the reasons

stated in the motion. Further, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s amended motion for

summary judgment is premature, because discovery in this case is ongoing. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

That Defendants’ motion to strike, Doc. 44, is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s

amended motion for summary judgment, Doc. 41, is STRICKEN.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6 day of June 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 45 Filed 06/06/11 Page 1 of 1