alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DIANN L. ELLIS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-70-SPM-WCS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 31). The Parties have been furnished copies and have

been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the

Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 31) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The decision of the commissioner is reversed. 

3. This case is remanded to the Commissioner to determine whether

Plaintiff’s limitation to sedentary work for the period from August 31,

2006, through November 24, 2008, rendered her disabled and entitled 

Case 4:10-cv-00070-SPM-WCS Document 32 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 2
to benefits.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-third day of May, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00070-SPM-WCS Document 32 Filed 05/23/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

REGINALD J. BOUIE, JR.,

Petitioner, 

vs. Case No. 3:10cv199/LAC/CJK

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated July 31, 2012. (Doc. 30). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have

made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed

objections thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 4), challenging

petitioner’s conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Reginald J. Bouie, Jr. in

the CircuitCourt for Escambia County, Florida, Case No. 03-277 is DENIED, and the

clerk is directed to close the file.

Case 3:10-cv-00199-LC-CJK Document 34 Filed 09/19/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19 day of September, 2012.

th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv199LAC/CJK

Case 3:10-cv-00199-LC-CJK Document 34 Filed 09/19/12 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7864

HOGAN HUGH JUSTICE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARTHA A. WANNAMAKER, DCI Warden; JOSEPH

COUNTS, DCI Associate Warden; BURKE BROWN, DCI

Principal; DIANE AUSTIN, DCI Librarian;

SERGEANT PROPER, Investigating Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-3490-20BC-3)

Submitted: September 30, 1997 Decided: October 15, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hogan Hugh Justice, Appellant Pro Se. William Ansel Collins, Jr.,

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion to vacate its prior order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §

1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

on the reasoning of the district court. Justice v. Wannamaker, No.

CA-95-3490-20BC-3 (D.S.C. Nov. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5559]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Cooperative Research Group on High Efficiency 
Dilute Gasoline Engine (HEDGE)

    Notice is hereby given that, on June 1, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Southwest Research Institute 
(``SwRI''): Cooperative Research Group on High Efficiency Dilute 
Gasoline Engine (``HEDGE'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Honda R&D Co., Ltd, Tochigi Prefecture, 
JAPAN has been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and HEDGE intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On June 10, 2005, HEDGE filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on July 7, 
2005 (70 FR 39339-39340).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 5, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on May 7, 2007 (72 FR 25782).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-5559 Filed 11-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Real Goods Solar, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Schaeffer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 13, 2008

/s/ John SchaefferJohn SchaefferChief Executive Officer
# CE2009068EN.01003902.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 68/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 68/39

---

European Parliament legislative resolution of 31 January 2008 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the submission by Member States of statistics on aquaculture (COM(2006)0864 — C6-0005/2007 — 2006/0286(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0864), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2006)0864),

| — | having regard to Articles 251(2) and 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0005/2007), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Articles 251(2) and 285(1) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0005/2007),

| — | having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries (A6-0001/2008), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries (A6-0001/2008),

| 1. | Approves the Commission proposal as amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

| 2. | Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

---

P6_TC1-COD(2006)0286

Position of the European Parliament adopted at first reading on 31 January 2008 with a view to the adoption of Regulation (EC) No .../2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the submission by Member States of statistics on aquaculture and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 788/96

(As an agreement was reached between Parliament and Council, Parliament's position at first reading corresponds to the final legislative act, Regulation (EC) No .../2008.)

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KEVIN M. TAYLOR,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:09cv304/RS/MD

B. GORDAN, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff initiated

this action on September 4, 2009 by filing a civil rights complaint (doc. 1). On

October 9, 2009, plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and

assessed an initial partial filing fee of $8.33. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff was given thirty (30)

days in which to pay the initial filing fee, and warned that failure to do so would

result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Since that time, the court

has issued three show cause orders (docs. 7, 10, 16), granted several extensions of

time (docs. 9, 13, 15), and provided plaintiff the opportunity to submit updated

account statements showing that modification of the initial partial filing fee is

warranted (see docs. 13, 15). Plaintiff has not paid the assessed fee or submitted

an updated account statement. 

The last show cause order in this case was issued on May 10, 2010. (Doc. 16). 

That order gave plaintiff a final opportunity to avoid dismissal of this case by paying

the initial partial filing fee within twenty-one days. Plaintiff was explicitly advised: 

“If it is plaintiff’s contention that he is unable to pay the $8.33 partial filing fee, his

response to this order must include an account statement for the time period

specified above [November 25, 2009 to the present].” (Doc. 16, p. 1). Plaintiff was

again warned that failure to comply with the order as instructed would result in a
Page 2 of 2

recommendation that this case be dismissed. (Id.). To date, plaintiff has not

responded to the order. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this cause be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s

failure to comply with an order of the court.

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17 day of June, 2010. th

 

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITEDSTATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within fourteen days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that

may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Case No: 5:09cv304/RS/MD
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 1:10CR27SPM

CABIOCH BONTEMPS

 /

DEFENDANT CABIOCH BONTEMPS

MOTION TO ADOPT CO-DEFENDANT’S MOTION

TheDefendant,CABIOCHBONTEMPS, through undersigned counsel, requests the

Court’s permission to adopt the following motion and accompanying memorandum of law

filed on behalf of Co-Defendant WILLY PAUL EDOUARD:

1. Defendant Edouard’s Motion to Suppress (Doc. # 186).

2. The purpose for allowing the adoption isto avoid duplicitous motions and for

the sake of judicial economy. This request is made in good faith and not for the purposes of

unnecessary delay or harassment.

WHEREFORE, Defendant CABIOCH BONTEMPS respectfully requests the entry

of an Order granting permission to adopt the above-mentioned motion and accompanying

memorandum of law filed on behalf of Co-Defendant Willy Paul Edouard.
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been

electronically furnished to Assistant United States Attorney Frank Williams, 300 E. University

Avenue, Third Floor, Gainesville, Florida 32601, Adriana Vieco and Roy Conn, Trial

Attorneys, CivilRights Division, U. S. Department ofJustice, 601 D Street NW, Room 5542,

Washington, DC 20530; Lloyd Vipperman,15 S.E. 7th Street, Gainesville, FL 32601; and to

Huntley Johnson, 226 S.W. 2nd Street, Gainesville, FL 32601, on January 9, 2012

Respectfully Submitted,

RANDOLPH P. MURRELL

Federal Public Defender

 By: s/Darren J. Johnson 

Darren J. Johnson

Assistant Federal Public Defender

New York Bar No. 4056800

101 S. E. 2nd Place, Suite 112

Gainesville, FL 32601

(352) 373-5823
Case 5:10-cv-00082-RH-MD   Document 1   Filed 04/16/10   Page 1 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00082-RH-MD   Document 1   Filed 04/16/10   Page 2 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00082-RH-MD   Document 1   Filed 04/16/10   Page 3 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00082-RH-MD   Document 1   Filed 04/16/10   Page 4 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00082-RH-MD   Document 1   Filed 04/16/10   Page 5 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00082-RH-MD   Document 1   Filed 04/16/10   Page 6 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00082-RH-MD   Document 1   Filed 04/16/10   Page 7 of 7
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5229 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5229

 To amend section 505 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
Responsibility Act of 1996 to clarify the prohibition on postsecondary 
  education benefits for certain aliens, to grant a private right of 
 action to persons injured by a violation of such prohibition, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2018

Mr. Perry (for himself, Mr. Jody B. Hice of Georgia, Mr. King of Iowa, 
 Mr. Babin, Mr. Harris, and Mr. Biggs) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition 
  to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 505 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
Responsibility Act of 1996 to clarify the prohibition on postsecondary 
  education benefits for certain aliens, to grant a private right of 
 action to persons injured by a violation of such prohibition, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tuition Fairness for Citizens Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION BENEFITS OF 
              ALIENS NOT LAWFULLY PRESENT.

    Section 505 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1623) is amended to read as 
follows:

``SEC. 505. LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY FOR HIGHER EDUCATION BENEFITS OF 
              ALIENS NOT LAWFULLY PRESENT.

    ``(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an 
alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be 
eligible for any postsecondary education benefit unless all citizens 
and nationals of the United States are likewise eligible for such 
benefit.
    ``(b) Private Right of Action.--Any person who is aggrieved by a 
violation of subsection (a) may bring a civil action in any court of 
appropriate jurisdiction for--
            ``(1) declaratory, injunctive, or other equitable relief;
            ``(2) damages; and
            ``(3) such other relief as the court may deem appropriate.
    ``(c) Effective Date.--This section, as amended by the Tuition 
Fairness for Citizens Act, shall apply to benefits provided on or after 
the date of the enactment of such Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

CFO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Kevin T. Michaels,
Chief Financial Officer of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended January 3, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  |                             
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Date: February 19, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ KEVIN T. MICHAELS
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Kevin T. Michaels           
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Chief Financial Officer     
|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                       |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LAWRENCE L. BLANKENSHIP,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv248/MCR/MD

HONORABLE JOHN SIMON, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on July 15, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after reviewing

objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is adopted as the

opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The plaintiff’s federal claims are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

3. Any state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of August, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

COTTIE ANN WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cv155-SPM/GRJ

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case has been dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the parties’ Joint

Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice (doc. 28) and Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, the clerk shall close this case.

SO ORDERED this 9th day of February, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge