alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015434EN.01026201.xml

| 23.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 434/262 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 434/262

---

P7_TA(2012)0501

Multiannual Framework for the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights ***

***

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 December 2012 on the draft Council decision establishing a Multiannual Framework for 2013-2017 for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (10449/2012 — C7-0169/2012 — 2011/0431(APP))

(Special legislative procedure — consent)

(2015/C 434/47)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (10449/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (10449/2012),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0169/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0169/2012),

| — | having regard to Rule 81(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 81(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0361/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0361/2012),

| 1. | Consents to the draft Council decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the draft Council decision;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

SEP 7 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

ROLANDO HERNANDEZ PEREZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

INTERCONNECT DEVICES

INCORPORATED,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 98-3356

(D.C. No. 97-CV-2194-GTV)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , KELLY , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

The district court granted summary judgment against plaintiff Rolando

Hernandez Perez on his claims that his former employer, defendant Interconnect

Devices Incorporated, was liable to him for common-law negligence and

discrimination, harassment, and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17; the Americans with

Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213; and the Kansas Acts Against

Discrimination, Kan. Stat. Ann. §§ 44-1001 to 1044. Plaintiff appeals the

summary judgment ruling and also alleges that he was mistreated during the

course of litigation.

We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same

standard as the district court to determine whether there is a genuine issue as to

any material fact and whether defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 

See Zinn v. McKune , 143 F.3d 1353, 1356 (10th Cir. 1998). We examine the

factual record and the reasonable inferences which may be drawn from it in the

light most favorable to the plaintiff. See id.

Guided by these standards, we have reviewed the record and conclude that

the district court was correct in entering summary judgment on plaintiff’s claims.

Moreover, we find no support in the record for plaintiff’s claims of misconduct

on the part of the district court judge, magistrate judge, appointed counsel, and 
-3-

opposing counsel. We affirm for substantially the same reasons stated in the

district court’s thorough, well-reasoned order dated October 22, 1998. The

mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 23.1


                            KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA , LLC








To Whom It May Concern:                                             May 31, 2005



The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, Certified Public Accountant, LLC hereby consents to
the inclusion of his report of August 5, 2004, accompanying the audited
financial statements of Dazzling Investments, Inc., as at December 31, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, in the Form 10KSB.


Very truly yours,


/s/ KYLE L. TINGLE
____________________________
    Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC

















P.O. Box 50141, Henderson, Nevada 89016, Phone: (702) 434-8452, Fax: (702)
436-4218, e-mail: ktingle@kyletinglecpa.com
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL
 OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to the Requirements set forth
in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U. S. C. §
1350, as adopted, the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), Ta Kun Song, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer  of the Company, hereby certifies
that:
 
 (1) The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, to
which this Certification is attached (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 Date:
August 13, 2010
 
 /S/
      Ya Kun SongYa
      Kun SongChief Executive Officer
                    (Principal
      Executive Officer) and
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
                    (Principal
      Financial Officer)
 This
certification accompanies and is being furnished with this Periodic Report,
shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability
under that Section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filings of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the
date of this Periodic report, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday, December 21, 2007.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Surveillance matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sauntia S. Warfield, (202) 418-5084.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-5820  Filed 11-20-07; 11:30 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), announces the establishment of the Emerging Neuroscience and Training Integrated Review Group.

                    The Emerging Neuroscience and Training Integrated Review Group shall                           ( print page 65051)                        provide advice and recommendations to the Director, NIH, and the Director, Center for Scientific Review (CSR), on the scientific and technical merit of applications for grants-in-aid for research, research training or research-related grants and cooperative agreements, or contact proposals relating to (1) the crosscutting technologies that serve all of the neurosciences, including neuroinformatics and imaging and molecular neurogenetics; (2) crosscutting emerging science in the small business area for all of the neurosciences; and (3) the training areas for all of the neurosciences.                

Duration of this committee is continuing unless formally determined by the Director, NIH, that termination would be in the best public interest.

Dated: November 1, 2007.

Elias A. Zerhouni,

Director, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 07-5744 Filed 11-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

FRANKIE LEE SPIKES, JR,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00130-MP-AK

SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and Doc. 2, a motion for leave to proceed as a pauper. Petitioner attacks his

1989 convictions for first degree premeditated murder and arson. Petitioner concedes that he

was previously denied relief under § 2254 with respect to the same convictions, and that a

second petition was dismissed as successive. See Doc. 1 at 3; Spikes v. Crosby, Case No. 1:92-

cv-10061-MMP (N.D. Fla.), Docs. 12 (order denying petition), 20 (order denying certificate of

probable cause), 25 (order of Court of Appeals denying certificate of probable cause); Spikes v.

Crosby, Case No. 1:06-cv-164-MMP-AK (N.D. Fla.), Doc. 21 (order dismissing petition as

successive). 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), this Court cannot consider a second or successive

habeas petition until a panel of the Eleventh Circuit has authorized its filing. There is no

indication that Petitioner has satisfied the requirements for filing this case, and thus, it is not
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:10-cv-00130-MP-AK

properly before this Court for consideration. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

That this case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of July, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
#### SUNSET INVESTMENTS, LTD. v. SARGENT

No. 282 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 284.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
#### STATE v. GUIRGUIS

No. 57 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 405.

Application by defendant for further review denied 6 November 1979.
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 13 Filed 09/02/10 Page 1 of 4Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 13 Filed 09/02/10 Page 2 of 4Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 13 Filed 09/02/10 Page 3 of 4Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 13 Filed 09/02/10 Page 4 of 4
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D 20 2 3

- 4236 Lower Tribunal No. 2 0 21

- CA

- 00 0998

- 0001

- XX

_____________________________
A MY K ATHRYN C OPELIN L ANTZ , as Personal Representative of the E STATE OF D AVID L. C OPELIN , Appellant
,

v.

P AVONIA L IFE I NSURANCE C OMPANY OF M ICHIGAN , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the C ircuit Court for Collier County

. Lauren L. Brodie
, Ju dge.

A u gust 27, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED

.

STARGEL and WHITE , JJ., a nd LAMBERT, B.D., Associate Judge, c oncur

.

C. Christopher Muth, of C. Christopher Muth Ltd., Naples, for Appellant.

S onia M. Diaz and Amanda M. Globetti, of Coleman, Taylor, Klaus, Doupé, Diaz & Torrez, P.A., Naples
, for Appellee.

Brian J. Linnerooth and John A. Sullivan, of Best & Flanagan, LLP, Minneapolis, Minnesota , Pro Hac Vice, for Appellee

.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
#### STATE v. GEORGE DIXON.

(Filed 3 November, 1965.)

Criminal Daw § 169—

Upon the death of the defendant prior to argument of the appeal, the action abates and the appeal will be dismissed.

ON 3 February 1965 the petition of George Dixon for writ of *certiorari*to review the trial of the defendant before *Fountain, J.,*at the August Session 1963 of Nash County, was allowed.

Defendant was tried upon a bill of indictment charging him with the murder of Rosa Simmons, alias Rosa Dixon. Defendant was found guilty of murder in the first degree with recommendation of life imprisonment. From the judgment imposed, defendant gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. No appeal was perfected. We allowed the defendant’s petition for writ of *certiorari*on 3 February 1965 and directed the court-appointed counsel to perfect the appeal and have it docketed in time to be heard in its regular order at the *562Fall Term 1965. The appeal was argued before this Court on 28 September 1965.

*Attorney General Bruton, Deputy Attorney General Harry W. McGalliard for the State.*

*Thomas G. Dill and Boy C. Boddie for defendant.*

PER Cueiam.

It having been suggested that the defendant has died since appeal herein was docketed and argued in this Court, the action stands abated and the appeal must be dismissed. It is so ordered. *In re LeFevre,*243 N.C. 714, 91 S.E. 2d 926; 24A C.J.S., Criminal Law, § 1825(3), page 483.

Action abated.

Appeal dismissed.
RAY JAMES

,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPT. OF

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 6

- 1473

Opinion filed May 4, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Ray James , pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belate d appeal is denied. S ee Powell v. Dep’t of Corr. , 727 So.

2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

PETITION DENIED.

WOLF, WETHERELL, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOHN M. PAULK,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv148/MCR/MD

WALTER A. MCNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on August 19, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 221 (Friday, November 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64660-64661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5680]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; PA-07-205 Research on 
the Economics of Diet, Activity, and Energy Balance.
    Date: December 5, 2007.
    Time: 2:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: John F. Connaughton, PhD, Scientific, Review 
Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of 
Health, Room 753, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, 
(301) 594-7797, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#46252928282733212e3229282c06233e32342768282f22222d68282f2e68212930"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0c6f6362626d796b64786362664c6974787e6d22626568686722626564226b637a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


[[Page 64661]]


    Dated: November 5, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5680 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### MRS. BERTHA SPRUEILL, Administratrix of the Estate of MAURICE SPRUEILL, JR. v. LINARD HAMLET.

(Filed 20 November 1963.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Brock, S.J.,*May 27, 1963 Civil Session of PERSON.

Plaintiff brings this action to -recover damages resulting from tire -death of her intestate, -passenger in a -bus traveling month on Highway 57. She alleges her intestate’s death was proxi-mately caused by defendant’® negligence in that he o-pierated hie truck 'in a southward direction at night loaded with slab wood inadequately secured and in such manner that the width of the vehicle and load exceeded ninety-six inches, and while so- loaded defendant operated his truck without adequate lights and either to the left of .or in such close proximity to- the center of the highway that one of the pieces -of wood projecting from his -truck pierced the bus, striking and killing plaintiff’s intestate when the vehicles .passed.

Defendant .denied plaintiff’s allegations -of negligence. He alleged he was -driving hi® vehicle in hi® right lane; the bus driver veered to- his left and -came into defendant’® lane of travel; “at that instant the left side -of the bus sideswiped the left .side -oif the -bed of -the truck . . . the force of the collision .caused one of the wooden, slabs loaded on the bed of Ibis .truck to- become dislodged .and .the same penetrated the win-doiw -on the left front and side of the bus and thereafter struck plaintiff’s intestate.” At-the -conclusion o-f plaintiff’s evidence, defendant’s motion for -non/suit was -allowed. Plaintiff excepted and -appealed.

*Burns, Long & Burns by F. Kent Burns, Young, Moore & Henderson by J. C. Moore for plaintiff appellant.*

*Haywood and Denny by Egbert L. Haywood and George W. Miller, Jr., for defendant appellee.*

*547PeR Cuhiam.

We have carefully examined the evidence. We are of ■the opinion and hold that, when viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, it is sufficient to permit a jury to find the facts to be a® alleged by plaintiff. If the facts be a® plaintiff alleges, defendant is liable. No useful purpose would be served by detailed analysis of the evidence. In accord with our practice, *Weaver v.*Bennett, 259 N.C. 16, 129 S.E. 2d 610, discussion of the evidence is omitted.

Reversed.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of  Porfavor, Inc., for the Quarterly ended September  30, 2008, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Porfavor, Inc., for the Quarterly ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly ended June 30, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of International Industrial Enterprises.  By:  /s/ Boyd V. ApplegateName:    Boyd V. ApplegateTitle:      CEO, President, DirectorDate:      November 11, 2008By:  /s/ Christine M. ApplegateName:   Christine M. ApplegateTitle:     CFO, Controller, Treasurer,
Secretary, DirectorDate:     November 11, 2008