alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

Nos. 00-1201/1204

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeals from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Larry Leonard Thompson, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: December 28, 2000

 Filed: January 9, 2001

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In appeal No. 00-1201, Larry Thompson challenges the district court’s1 denial

of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis, in which he attacked the restitution

imposed in his 1988 convictions for mail and wire fraud. Thompson could have raised

this issue on direct appeal, but did not; we conclude that having failed to do so, he

cannot raise it through this petition. See Azzone v. United States, 341 F.2d 417, 419

(8th Cir. 1965) (per curiam) (“Coram nobis may not be used as a substitute for an
-2-

appeal.”), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 943 (1965) and 390 U.S. 970 (1968); Lipscomb v.

United States, 273 F.2d 860, 865 (8th Cir.) (“It is well established that Writ of Error

Coram Nobis . . . will not lie where there is another adequate remedy, as by motion for

new trial or appeal.”), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 836 (1960).

In appeal No. 00-1204, Thompson challenges the district court’s denial of his

motion for an extension of time to appeal the denial of his motion to supplement the

record, and the court’s denial of his motion for an extension of time to file a reply to

the government’s response to his writ petition. Having carefully reviewed the record,

we summarily affirm the court’s orders in these matters. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent. 

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to ISTO Technologies, Inc. of St. Louis, Missouri, an exclusive license to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 11/058,034, “Porous Polymeric Matrices Made of Natural Polymers and Synthetic Polymers and Optionally at Least One Cation and Methods of Making”, filed on February 15, 2005.

# DATES:

                        Comments must be received within thirty (30) days of the date of publication of this Notice in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

June Blalock of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 301-504-5989.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Government's patent rights in this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public interest to so license this invention as ISTO Technologies Inc. of St. Louis, Missouri has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,

Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 07-5505 Filed 11-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-03-M
EXHIBIT 21.1SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT   NAME Ownership %  on 4/30/07   Township Petroleum Corporation, an Alberta (Canada) corp. 100%   Oilsands Quest Sask, Inc., an Alberta (Canada) corp. 100%   Western Petrochemicals Corporation, an Alberta (Canada) corp. 100%   Stripper Energy Services Inc., an Alberta (Canada) corp.1 100%   1291329 Alberta Ltd., an Alberta (Canada) corp. 100%   Anhydride Petroleum (USA), Inc., a Colorado corp.2 100% 1) Stripper Energy Services, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Oilsands Quest Sask, Inc.
Hays Street Bridge 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 22, 2015

No. 04-14-00886-CV

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, et. al.,

Appellants

v.

HAYS STREET BRIDGE RESTORATION GROUP, et. al.,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-19589

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due on September 4, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.1. On 

September 16, 2015, this court notified court reporter Luis Duran Jr. that the reporter’s record 

was late and he must file a notification of late record by September 28, 2015, or the reporter’s 

record not later than October 16, 2015. See id. R. 37.3(a)(1). To date, this court has not received 

a notification of late record and the reporter’s record has not been filed.

We ORDER court reporter Luis Duran Jr. to file the reporter’s record in this court not 

later than FIFTEEN DAYS from the date of this order. See id. R. 35.3(c). 

If the reporter’s record is not filed as ordered, a show cause order shall issue directing 

Luis Duran Jr. to appear on a day certain and show cause why he should not be held in contempt 

for failing to file the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.

§ 21.002 (West 2004) (authorizing contemnor punishment up to “a fine of not more than $500 or 

confinement in the county jail for not more than six months, or both such a fine and confinement 

in jail”); Johnson v. State, 151 S.W.3d 193, 195–96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) (noting the court’s 

previous action holding a court reporter in contempt for “repeatedly fail[ing] to prepare and file 

the record” and “order[ing] him incarcerated . . . until the record was finished”).

We direct the clerk of this court to cause a copy of this order to be served on Luis Duran 

Jr. by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to addressee only, or give 

other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery.
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of October, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit
32(a)**
 
  **TXU
CORP.**
 **Certificate
Pursuant to Section 906**
 **of
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002**
 **CERTIFICATION
OF CEO**
  
  The undersigned, C. John Wilder, President and Chief Executive of TXU Corp. (the
“Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:
  1.   
      The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
      2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a)
      or 15(d)of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.  Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed
this 15th day of March, 2005.
  
 /s/   C. John
Wilder
 Name:  C. John
Wilder
 Title:
    President
      and Chief Executive
 
  
         A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
TXU Corp. and will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### ARRINGTON v. BRAD RAGAN, INC.

No. 183P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 416.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 June 1982.
# C_2009093EN.01002101.xml

| 22.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/21

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

EPSO/AD/166/09 and EPSO/AD/167/09

2009/C 93/06

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competitions

| | EPSO/AD/166/09

  to recruit translators (AD5) with Bulgarian as their main language

  and |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/166/09

EPSO/AD/166/09

to recruit translators (AD5) with Bulgarian as their main language

translators (AD5) with Bulgarian as their main language

and

| | EPSO/AD/167/09

  to recruit translators (AD5) with Romanian as their main language. |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/167/09

EPSO/AD/167/09

to recruit translators (AD5) with Romanian as their main language.

translators (AD5) with Romanian as their main language

The competition notice is published in Official Journal C 93 A of 22 April 2009 in Bulgarian and Romanian only.

C 93 A of 22 April 2009

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Gary Carson, Appellant

No. 06

- 15

- 00170

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 102nd District Court of Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 14F0102

- 102 ). Opinion delivered by Just ice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating. Dissenting Opinion by Justice Burgess.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment

of the court below. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court as it relates to the

conviction. W e reverse the trial court ’s sentence and remand the cause for a new sentencing

hearing.

We further order that the appell ee
, The State of Texas , pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED JANUARY 31, 2017

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.1





Certification Pursuant to

Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Jeff Ritchie, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Independent Film Development Corporation;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: May 20, 2010



/s/  Jeff Ritchie

Jeff Ritchie

Chief Executive Officer, and Director
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5250 

To reauthorize the Rural Economic Area Partnership Zones Program through 

fiscal year 2023. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2018 

Mr. FASO (for himself and Mr. WELCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Rural Economic Area Partnership Zones 

Program through fiscal year 2023. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE RURAL ECONOMIC 

4 AREA PARTNERSHIP ZONES PROGRAM. 

5 Section 310B(j) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural 

6 Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1932(j)) is amended by strik7 ing ‘‘2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2023’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 225 (Friday, November 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 65700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting and briefing.

Date and Time: Monday, December 3, 2007; 9 a.m. Meeting. 10 a.m. 
Briefing.

Place: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 540, 
Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Approval of Minutes of October 12, Meeting.
III. Program Planning.
    <bullet> Racial Preferences and the California Department of 
Transportation.
IV. Adjourn Meeting.

Briefing Agenda

Topic: Minorities in Special Education.
I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
II. Speakers' Presentations.
III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.
IV. Adjourn Briefing.

Contact Person for Further Information: Robert Lerner, Press and 
Communications, (202) 376-8582.

    Dated: November 20, 2007.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-5833 Filed 11-20-07; 3:14 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
Exhibit 31.2

CFO CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael A.
Doyle, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Forrester Research, Inc.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                       
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  |                                                       
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 12, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael A. Doyle                                  
|                      |  |  |  | Michael A. Doyle Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer
Case 1:10-cr-00047-MCR-GRJ   Document 105   Filed 02/08/12   Page 1 of 7

Case 1:10-cr-00047-MCR-GRJ   Document 105   Filed 02/08/12   Page 2 of 7

Case 1:10-cr-00047-MCR-GRJ   Document 105   Filed 02/08/12   Page 3 of 7

Case 1:10-cr-00047-MCR-GRJ   Document 105   Filed 02/08/12   Page 4 of 7

Case 1:10-cr-00047-MCR-GRJ   Document 105   Filed 02/08/12   Page 5 of 7

Case 1:10-cr-00047-MCR-GRJ   Document 105   Filed 02/08/12   Page 6 of 7

Case 1:10-cr-00047-MCR-GRJ   Document 105   Filed 02/08/12   Page 7 of 7
**COURT OF APPEALS**

**TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS**

****

June 25, 2015

No. 10-14-00406-CR

MICHAEL EDWARD STRICKLAND

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

From the 82nd District Court

Falls County, Texas

Trial Court No. 8032

**JUDGMENT**

	This appeal has been considered by the Court.  Because the Court finds that Michael Edward Strickland has failed in his duty to prosecute this appeal with diligence, it is the judgment of this Court that the appeal is dismissed.  

	A copy of this judgment will be certified by the Clerk of this Court and delivered to the trial court clerk for enforcement.

							PER CURIAM

****SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK			

						By: ___________________________

							Nita Whitener, Deputy Clerk

# image1.png

# image2.jpeg

# image3.png
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DONALD JAMES,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv259/RS-GRJ

EXPEDITO M. SALVADOR;

MOSES IZUEGBU; and REYNALDO

GEERKEN,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Order (Doc. 65) and Plaintiff’s Objection

To Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion For Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 69), which is

directed to the denial of Plaintiff’s Request For A Preliminary Injunction. I will consider

de novo the Magistrate Judge’s denial of a preliminary injunction as provided by 28

U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B)(C). Plaintiff’s Motion For Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 44) and the

memorandum and other attached documents fail to establish the requisite elements for

the extraordinary remedy of a preliminary injunction. 

Plaintiff’s Motion For A Preliminary Injunction is denied.

 ORDERED on August 30, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00259-RS-GRJ Document 71 Filed 08/30/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SEAN REILLY,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:10cv313-WS

JENNIFER DAVIS,

Defendant.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 10)

docketed August 26, 2010. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's

amended complaint be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to

state a claim. The plaintiff’s copy of the report and recommendation was returned to the

court as undeliverable. Doc. 11. Although it is his responsibility to do so, the plaintiff

has not provided the court with a current address. 

Upon review of the record, the court has determined that the magistrate judge's

report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 10) is ADOPTED

and incorporated by reference into this order.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:10cv313-WS

2. The plaintiff's amended complaint and this action are DISMISSED for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of September , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 1 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 2 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 3 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 4 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 5 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 6 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 7 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 8 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 9 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 10 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 11 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 12 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 13 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 14 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 15 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 16 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 17 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 18 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 19 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 20 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 21 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 22 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 23 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 24 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 25 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 26 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 27 of 28
Case 1:10-cv-00096-MW-GRJ Document 4 Filed 07/16/10 Page 28 of 28