alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-31024

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ROBERT LEE THOMPSON, JR

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:07-CR-30034-1

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Robert Lee Thompson, Jr., has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Thompson has filed a response. The record is

insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Thompson’s claim

of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on

direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no

opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.”

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 23, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-31024

2

United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal

quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record,

counsel’s brief, and Thompson’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WILLIE MURPHY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv146/LAC/EMT

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter having come before the Court on a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal, this

case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear its own fees and costs.

ORDERED on this 8th day of October, 2010.

s/L.A. Collier

Lacey A. Collier

Senior United States District Judge
# C_2009160EN.01000601.xml

| 14.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 July 2009

2009/C 160/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3975 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,03 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4451 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86780 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0518 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5133 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0700 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,028 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,96 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7000 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4020 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2238 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1701 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8010 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6239 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8308 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2407 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0483 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 831,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5835 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5487 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3310 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 310,09 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0338 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,508 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,8900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,732 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7850 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,1576 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,6030 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3975

JPY

Japanese yen

129,03

DKK

Danish krone

7,4451

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86780

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0518

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5133

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0700

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,028

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,96

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7000

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4020

RON

Romanian leu

4,2238

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1701

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8010

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6239

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8308

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2407

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0483

KRW

South Korean won

1 831,85

ZAR

South African rand

11,5835

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5487

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3310

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 310,09

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0338

PHP

Philippine peso

67,508

RUB

Russian rouble

45,8900

THB

Thai baht

47,732

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7850

MXN

Mexican peso

19,1576

INR

Indian rupee

68,6030

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANDY V. JOSEPH,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-397-SPM-WCS

WALTER MCNEAL,

Respondent.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 6). Petitioner has been furnished a copy and has been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report

and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 6) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The case is dismissed without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this first day of March, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 26 (Thursday, February 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 5962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-550]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service

Southwest Washington Province Advisory Committee Meeting Notice

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Southwest Washington Province Advisory Committee will meet 
on Friday, March 9, 2007, at the Gifford Pinchot National Forest 
Headquarters, 10600 NE 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682. The meeting 
will begin at 9:30 a.m. and continue until 4 p.m.
    The purpose of the meeting is to share information and receive 
feedback on: Northwest Forest Plan monitoring ten-year results; Gifford 
Pinchot National Forest's Fiscal Year 2007 and 2008 timber sale plan; 
flood and storm damage within the Gifford Pinchot National Forest; and 
to share information among Committee members.
    All Southwest Washington Province Advisory Committee meetings are 
open to the public. Interested citizens are encouraged to attend. The 
``open forum'' provides an opportunity for the public to bring issues, 
concerns, and discussion topics to the Advisory Committee. The ``open 
forum'' is scheduled for 1:30 p.m. Interested speakers will need to 
register prior to the open forum period. The committee welcomes the 
public's written comments on Committee business at any time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Strebig, Public Affairs Officer, 
at (360) 891-5005, or write Forest Headquarters Office: Gifford Pinchot 
National Forest, 10600 NW. 51st Circle, Vancouver, WA 98682.

    Dated: February 1, 2007.
Claire Lavendel,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-550 Filed 2-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
```
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionshould not * be publishe d an d is not precedent except under the limited circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 31024 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. ROBERT L EE T HO M PS ON, J R D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he W es t er n D i st r i c tof Loui si ana U SD C N o. 3: 07- C R
- 30034- 1
B ef ore SM ITH , B E N AV ID E S , an d H AY N E S , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e att orneyapp oi n t ed to represent R obertL ee T h om pson , Jr. , ha s m oved f o rl e av e t o w i t h draw a n d has f i l e d ab r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nders v. Ca lif o rn ia , 3 8 6 U .S . 7 3 8 (1 9 6 7 ). T h o m p s o n h a s file da re s p o n s e . T h e re c o r d is in s u ffic ie n tlyd e v e lo p e d to a llo w co n s id e r a tio n a t t h is tim e o f T h o m p s o n ’ s cla im of i n ef fect ive assi st an ce of

coun sel ; su ch cl ai m s general l y “ can n otbe res olved on di r e c ta ppe alw he n [ t he y hav e ] notbe e n ra i s e d b e f o r e t he di s t r i c tc o ur ts i nc e no o p p o r tu n itye x is te d to d e v e lo p th e re c o r do n th e m e r its o f th e a lle g a tio n s .” United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 23, 2 009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 31024

2 Un itedS ta te s v. Ca n tw ell , 470 F. 3d 1087, 1091 ( 5t h C i r . 2006) (i nt er nal quo t at i o n m ar ks a nd c i t at i o n om i t t e d)
. O uri nde pe nde ntre vi e w of t he r e c o r d, coun sel ’ s bri ef, an d T h om pson ’ s r espon se di scl oses n o non f rivol ou s i ssue f

or a p p e a l
. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s mo t i o n f o rl e a v e t o wi t h d r a w i s GR ANT ED , cou n sel i s e x c u sed f rom f u rth er re sp on sibi l i ti es h ere i n , an dthe A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BARBARA H. ENGBERG,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv64/RV/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of the 

Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 29, 2011 (Doc. 23). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, this action is REMANDED to the

Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00064-RV-EMT Document 24 Filed 07/29/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of League Now Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31,
2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Haim Yeffet, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the
        financial condition and result of operations
        of the Company.



|/s/
    Haim Yeffet     | 
|----------------------- | 
|Haim Yeffet             | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|May 16, 2013            | 



A signed original of this certification
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILLIE FRED BAUCHAM,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00263-MP-WCS

CITY OF APALACHICOLA, FRANKLIN COUNTY, GARY HUNNINGS, VAN JOHNSON,

KIT MASHBURN, MIKE MOCK, ROBERT SHELLEY, BOBBY VARNES, JIM WATKINS ,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 47, Joint Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting,

in which the parties agree to all deadlines. The Joint Report is adopted, and the Clerk is directed

to set the appropriate deadlines therefrom.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of July, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00263-MP-WCS Document 48 Filed 07/26/11 Page 1 of 1
#### W. Stanley BARRETT et al., Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 6458.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

July 19, 1965.

*917Richard F. Canning, Providence, R. I., with whom Andrew P. Quinn and Letts & Quinn, Providence, R. I., were on brief, for petitioners.

J. Edward Shillingburg, Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson and Melva M. Graney, Attorneys, Department of Justice, were on brief, for respondent.

Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, and MARIS* and BURGER* Circuit Judges.

*

 Sitting by designation.

BURGER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves the question whether election made by one of the petitioners to take paid-up life insurance policies under an option in matured endowment policies held by him gave rise to capital gain or to ordinary income. The endowment policies when issued provided that at maturity the petitioner as the insured would have four options: receipt of (1) a monthly income for life; (2) a lump-sum cash payment; (3) a paid-up life insurance policy; or (4) a lump-sum cash payment and a paid-up life insurance policy. At maturity in 1960 an election was duly made to take the option providing for paid-up life insurance. On the joint return filed by the insured and his wife, petitioners here, they reported as long-term capital gain the amount by which the replacement value of the newly acquired life insurance policies exceeded the cost of the endowment policies (premiums paid less dividends credited). Respondent determined that this gain was ordinary income and asserted a deficiency.

 Petitioners argued in the Tax Court that respondent was estopped from taxing the gain at ordinary income rates inasmuch as petitioners in exercising the option had relied on a letter from the Internal Revenue Service which they interpreted as indicating that the selection of the paid-up life insurance would give rise to capital gain. They also argued that the exercise of the option was an exchange of property under Sections 1221 and 1222 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and so taxable as long-term capital gain.

The Tax Court, 42 T.C. 993, found petitioners’ reliance on the informal letter unwarranted and held that the respondent was correct in his determining the gain taxable as ordinary income.

We have considered the petitioners’ contention that the Tax Court was wrong in so deciding as well as the other points raised by them but we find no error.

Affirmed.
# C_2010157EN.01000101.xml

| 17.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 June 2010

2010/C 157/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2277 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4382 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83085 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6014 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3888 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8780 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,741 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 281,07 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7073 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0925 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2360 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9291 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4261 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2631 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5658 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7651 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7141 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 487,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3836 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3880 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2130 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 254,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0048 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,760 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,3500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,796 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2048 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,5151 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 57,1620 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2277

JPY

Japanese yen

112,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4382

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83085

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6014

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3888

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8780

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,741

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

281,07

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7073

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0925

RON

Romanian leu

4,2360

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9291

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4261

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2631

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5658

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7651

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7141

KRW

South Korean won

1 487,22

ZAR

South African rand

9,3836

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3880

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2130

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 254,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0048

PHP

Philippine peso

56,760

RUB

Russian rouble

38,3500

THB

Thai baht

39,796

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2048

MXN

Mexican peso

15,5151

INR

Indian rupee

57,1620

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 3





Form 52-109F1 Certification of Annual Filings



I, Peter Dasler, CEO of CanAlaska Ventures Ltd. certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the annual filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim Filings) of CanAlaska Ventures Ltd. (the issuer) for the period ending April 30, 2006;



2.

Based on my knowledge, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the annual filings;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented in the annual filings;



4.

The issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the issuer, and we have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the annual filings and have caused the issuer to disclose in the annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the annual filings based on such evaluation.





Date: August 25, 2006



Peter Dasler

Peter Dasler

CEO
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, D. Michael Parker, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: December 14, 2006 

 

/s/ D. Michael Parker
D. Michael Parker
Senior Vice President, Finance and

Chief FinancialOfficer