Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

KENNETH GREGORY BEBOUT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00144-MP -AK

JOHNS, WEEKLY, ROBERT WOODY,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Plaintiff, an inmate at Alachua County Jail, initiated this case by filing a pro se Civil

Rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1) and a motion for leave to proceed as a

pauper (Doc. 5). The Complaint concerns an alleged denial of Plaintiff’s First Amendment

rights in connection with service of kosher meals at the jail.

Plaintiffs’ motion to proceed as a pauper (Doc. 5), is GRANTED to the extent that the

case may proceed without the prepayment of the entire filing fee. Because Plaintiff has

insufficient funds, the Court will not require Plaintiff to pay an initial partial filing fee as

provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A). However, Plaintiff is hereby assessed the total $350.00

filing fee in this case.

As funds become available in Plaintiff's prison account, he shall be required to make

monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income (that is, all funds

deposited into the account) credited to the account. Upon receipt of this Order, the agency

having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account on a monthly basis to

the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. These payments shall
Page 2 of 5

Case No: 1:10-cv-00144-MP -AK

continue until the filing fee of $350.00 is paid in full. The following information shall either be

included on the face of the check from the penal institution, cashier's check, or money order or

attached thereto: (1) the full name of the prisoner; (2) the prisoner's inmate number (#); and, (3)

Northern District of Florida Case Number (1:10cv144-MP/AK). Checks or money orders which

do not have this information will be subject to return. Accordingly, the Clerk shall mail a copy

of this Order by mail to: Administrator of the Inmate Trust Fund Account at the Alachua

County Jail, 3333 NE 39th Avenue, Gainesville, FL 32609.

Plaintiff is warned that he is ultimately responsible for payment of the filing fee if the

agency with custody over him/her lapses in its duty to make payments on his/her behalf. For this

reason, if Plaintiff is transferred to another jail or institution, Plaintiff should ensure that the new

institution is informed about this lawsuit and the required monthly payments as set out herein. 

Plaintiff is advised to retain a copy of this Order for this purpose.

AMENDMENT OF COMPLAINT

Pursuant to the Prison Litigation and Reform Act, the Court shall dismiss a case if the

Court determines that the action is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief

can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. 

See 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b)(1). Additionally, the Court must read Plaintiff’s pro se allegations in a

liberal fashion. 

Plaintiff must state specific facts supporting his claims against each defendant. While

prisoners retain First Amendment rights, including the First Amendment right of free exercise of

religion, regulations or policies "alleged to infringe constitutional rights [in prison] are judged

under a 'reasonableness' test less restrictive than that ordinarily applied to alleged infringements

of fundamental constitutional rights." O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 340, 349, 107 S.
Page 3 of 5

Case No: 1:10-cv-00144-MP -AK

Ct. 2400, 2404, 96 L. Ed. 2d 282 (1987). The Court in O'Lone directs federal courts to give

respect and deference to the judgment of prison administrators even in First Amendment

challenges raised within the confines of prison. Id. The standard of review requires that

challenged prison regulations be upheld if they are "reasonably related to legitimate penological

interests." O'Lone, 482 U.S. at 350, utilizing the standard of Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 107

S. Ct. 2254, 96 L. Ed. 2d 64 (1987). 

Thus, to find a free exercise violation in the prison context, a plaintiff must demonstrate

that prison officials have employed a policy or regulation, not reasonably related to any

legitimate penological interest or security measure, which burdens a practice of his religion or

prevents him from engaging in conduct or having a religious experience which the faith

mandates. This interference must be more than an inconvenience; the burden must be substantial

and significantly interfere with Plaintiff's practice of his religious beliefs. Cf. Thornburgh v.

Abbott, 490 U.S. 401, 418, 109 S. Ct. 1874, 1884, 104 L. Ed. 2d 459 (1989) (noting that O'Lone

found prison regulations valid in part because the prisoners were permitted to participate in other

Muslim religious ceremonies). 

From a review of the complaint, it does not appear that the Alachua County Jail was

basing its decision to deny Plaintiff kosher meals because of a policy, rather the decision was

based on the particular circumstances of his case, i.e. that he was seen eating non-kosher foods

and it was determined that it would not be a substantial burden on his practice to deny him

kosher meals. Regardless, Plaintiff must follow the instructions in the complaint and describe

what each defendant did or did not do that resulted in the denial of his meals.

Also, Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief only, i.e. a court order “that requires the Alachua

County Jail to provide kosher meals to Jewish and Muslim inmates as soon as possible.” 
Page 4 of 5

Case No: 1:10-cv-00144-MP -AK

Plaintiff should amend his relief to seek relief only on his own behalf. This is not a class action

lawsuit and Muslims do not eat kosher. 

In light of Plaintiff’s pro se status, the Court will permit Plaintiff an opportunity to

amend his Complaint to be more specific in asserting his claims against the individual

defendants and to amend his injunctive relief in connection with his First Amendment claim. To

amend his complaint, Plaintiff should completely fill out a new civil rights complaint form,

marking it “Amended Complaint.” The amended complaint must include all of Plaintiff’s claims

in this action and should not refer back to the original complaint. In amending, Plaintiff should

carefully review the following to determine whether he can present allegations sufficient to state

a cause of action: 

1) Plaintiff must state what rights have been violated under the Constitution, laws

or treaties of the United States. It is improper for the Plaintiff to merely list

constitutional or federal rights. Further, Plaintiff must provide support in the

statement of facts for the claimed violations.

2) Plaintiff should clearly describe how each named defendant is involved in the

alleged constitutional violation(s) in the body of the complaint. Plaintiff should note

that in civil rights cases, more than conclusory and vague allegations are required to

state a cause of action. Plaintiff must also show how he was harmed or injured by

the actions and/or omissions of the defendant(s).

3) Plaintiff should name only defendants who participated in the alleged deprivation

of constitutional rights or those persons who directed the action and/or omission that

resulted in such deprivation. 

The Clerk is directed to send the Plaintiff a blank Civil Rights Complaint form. After

carefully considering whether he can state a cause of action in accordance with this Order, Plaintiff
Page 5 of 5

Case No: 1:10-cv-00144-MP -AK

shall submit his Amended Complaint within TWENTY (20) DAYS or by September 6, 2010. The

failure to do so in the allotted time will result in the dismissal of this action 

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of August, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge