alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:09cr50-SPM/AK

STEVEN EUGENE PASSMORE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY

AND MOTION IN LIMINE

This cause comes before the Court for consideration of Defendant’s

motion to stay (doc. 36), Defendant’s motion in limine (doc. 37), and the

response in opposition filed by the Government (doc. 41). For the following

reasons, the motions will be denied.

1. Defendant’s pending appeal of his prior criminal case has no

bearing on the validity of the lien or encumbrance that he filed, which is the basis

for the indictment in this case. Therefore, the fact that an appeal may be pending

is not a valid reason to stay the prosecution of this case.

 2. The historical facts of the prior criminal case, regardless of the

outcome of the pending appeal, are relevant to the issue of whether Defendant
Page 2 of 2

filed the liens or encumbrances against the judge and former prosecutor on

account of the performance of their official duties. Accordingly, the evidence is

admissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) as proof of motive, intent, and

knowledge. It is also inextricably intertwined with the charged offense.

Based on the foregoing, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Defendant’s motion to stay (doc. 36) and

Defendant’s motion in limine (doc. 37) are denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of December, 2009.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:09cr50-SPM/AK
# C_2011151EN.01002301.xml

| 21.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/23

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

2011/C 151/06

The Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block E2 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).

Mijnbouwregeling

Staatscourant

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block E2 of the Dutch continental shelf.

Mijnbouwwet

Staatsblad

The Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the abovementioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| De minister van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie |
| --- |
| ter attentie van dhr. P. Jongerius, directie Energiemarkt |
| ALP/562 |
| Bezuidenhoutseweg 30 |
| Postbus 20101 |
| 2500 EC Den Haag |
| NEDERLAND |

De minister van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie

ter attentie van dhr. P. Jongerius, directie Energiemarkt

ALP/562

Bezuidenhoutseweg 30

Postbus 20101

2500 EC Den Haag

NEDERLAND

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained by calling Mr E.J. Hoppel on the following telephone number: +31 703797088.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DWAYNE CLINE NIMMONS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv321-SPM-WCS

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

_______________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge’s report

and recommendation (doc. 24) dated September 7, 2011. Petitioner was

furnished a copy, and has filed objections (doc. 25). 

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I find that the

report and recommendation should be adopted. Petitioner is steadfast in his

refusal to amend his 2254 petition by using the standard form in this district and

filing separate petitions for the judgments in 2000-1122 and 200-2551, as

previously ordered. See docs. 5 and 9. Accordingly it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The report and recommendation (doc. 24) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 4:10-cv-00321-SPM-WCS Document 26 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with a

court order and failure to prosecute.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:10cv321-SPM-WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00321-SPM-WCS Document 26 Filed 09/27/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BEVERLY NICHOLS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv169/RS-GRJ

FAIRFIELD BY MARRIOTT;

INTERMOUNTAIN MANAGMENT, LLC;

and IMM-ICH, LLC.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER RESCHEDULING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

Change of Time Only

The pretrial conference previously scheduled for Tuesday, July 5, 2011, at 9:30 a.m.

is rescheduled for 10:30 a.m., CDT.

ORDERED on June 15, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00169-RS-GRJ Document 47 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 1
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1802 

To provide a work opportunity tax credit for military spouses and to provide 

for flexible spending arrangements for childcare services for military families. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2019 

Mr. KAINE (for himself, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. TESTER, Mr. TILLIS, and Ms. 

SINEMA) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide a work opportunity tax credit for military spouses 

and to provide for flexible spending arrangements for 

childcare services for military families. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Jobs and Childcare 

5 for Military Families Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY TAX CREDIT FOR MILITARY 

7 SPOUSES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(d)(1) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1802 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph 

2 (I); 

3 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub4 paragraph (J) and inserting ‘‘, or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(K) a qualified military spouse.’’. 

8 (b) QUALIFIED MILITARY SPOUSE.—Section 51(d) of 

9 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following new paragraph: 

11 ‘‘(16) QUALIFIED MILITARY SPOUSE.—The 

12 term ‘qualified military spouse’ means the spouse or 

13 domestic partner (as recognized under State law or 

14 by the Armed Forces) of a member of the Armed 

15 Forces.’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

18 the employer after December 31, 2018. 

19 SEC. 3. FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS FOR 

20 CHILDCARE SERVICES FOR MILITARY FAMI21 LIES. 

22 (a) FSAS REQUIRED.—The Secretary concerned 

23 shall establish procedures to implement flexible spending 

24 arrangements with respect to basic pay and compensation 

25 for members of the Armed Forces for childcare services 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1802 IS

1 for dependent children of such members on a pre-tax basis 

2 in accordance with the regulations prescribed under sec3 tions 106(c) and 125 of the Internal Revenue Code of 

4 1986. 

5 (b) CONSIDERATIONS.—The procedures required by 

6 subsection (a) shall take into account the considerations 

7 specified in section 663(b) of the National Defense Au8 thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111– 

9 84; 123 Stat. 2371) and such other considerations as the 

10 Secretaries concerned consider appropriate. 

11 (c) SECRETARY CONCERNED DEFINED.—In this sec12 tion, the term ‘‘Secretary concerned’’ means the following: 

13 (1) The Secretary of Defense, with respect to 

14 members of the Army, the Navy, the Marine Corps, 

15 and the Air Force. 

16 (2) The Secretary of Homeland Security, with 

17 respect to members of the Coast Guard. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Case 7:07-cv-03468-SCR     Document 7      Filed 12/05/2007     Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of AEI Income & Growth Fund
XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



                           /s/ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 25, 2011




                           /s/PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 25, 2011
# C_2011092EN.01001301.xml

| 24.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/13

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 3 December 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.510 (2) — ONP

Rapporteur: Sweden

2011/C 92/09

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that it is possible that the conditions of Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 are fulfilled. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that it is possible that the conditions of Article 23(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 are fulfilled.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's assessment of the mitigating circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's assessment of the mitigating circumstances.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's overall assessment of the gravity of the infringement. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's overall assessment of the gravity of the infringement.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's assessment of the duration of the infringement. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission's assessment of the duration of the infringement.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the amount of the fine has been correctly determined. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the amount of the fine has been correctly determined.

---
Affirmed and Opinion Filed February 26, 1997

In The

(Uourt of Appeals

JTtfty Itstrtrt of Gkxas at Ballas

No. 05-92-02078-CR

STEVEN WRIGHT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F92-39359-R

OPINION PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Wright and Moseley

Steven Wright appeals his conviction for aggravated sexual assault of a child under

fourteen years old. As part of a plea bargain agreement with the State, appellant pleaded

nolo contendere to the charge and was placed on five years' deferred adjudication probation

and fined $750. Subsequently, the trial court adjudicated appellant and assessed punishment

at twenty years in prison. Appellant appealed.

In his sole point of error, appellant complains he was denied a statement of facts.
After appellant filed his brief, this Court abated the appeal to determine whether appellant

had been denied a statement of facts for any reason and to determine whether the statement

of facts in this cause was available. The trial court made findings, which we adopted, that

the statement of facts was available and could be filed with this Court. On November 22,

1996, we received the statement of facts from the adjudication/revocation hearing held on

August 20, 1992. On December 6, 1996, we received the statement of facts from the May

18, 1992 voir dire and May 19, 1992 guilty plea hearing. On December 17, 1992, the

statement of facts from another May 18, 1992 hearing was filed.

On December 30, 1996, we gave appellant thirty days to file an amended brief based

on the complete record. As of today's date, appellant's counsel, Ross Teter, has not filed

an amended brief nor has he filed a motion to extend time to file an amended brief.

It appears the record in this cause is complete, and appellant has not identified any

portion ofthe record that is missing. Therefore, appellant's point oferror that he has been

denied a statement of facts is moot. Appellant has brought no other points of error for

review.

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 90

-2-
Court of Appeals

iHfitj Itstrtrt of Okxas at lailas

JUDGMENT

STEVEN WRIGHT, Appellant

No. 05-92-02078-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the 265th Judicial District

Court ofDallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No.

F92-39359-R).

Opinion delivered per curiam before Chief

Justice Thomas, Justices Wright and

Moseley.

Based on the Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered February 26, 1997.

CHIEF JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brightlane Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steve Helm, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/Steve Helm

Steve Helm

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer

 

 

August 19, 2019
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MARCUS ISOM,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00177-MP-AK

WALTER A MCNEIL,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Motion to Stay, Doc. 21, regarding the Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus by Marcus Isom, Doc. 1. Petitioner has filed a motion for a new trial in

state court, raising claims of newly discovered evidence. If the new trial were granted, the

instant habeas corpus petition would become unnecessary, and if the new trial were denied, the

petition could be amended to include any and all claims so that they could be adjudicated at

once. Respondent does not oppose the stay, so long as Petitioner is responsible for keeping the

Court updated on the status of the state court proceeding. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Motion to Stay, Doc. 21, is GRANTED. 

2. This petition is STAYED pending the result of the state court motion for a new

trial. 

3. Mr. Isom will file a status report with the Court on June 23, 2010 and every 90

days thereafter, updating the Court on the status of the pending state court

proceeding. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of March, 2010
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:09-cv-00177-MP-AK

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-KSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          1,110
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          4,642
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     9,791
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          3,339
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            3,215
<LOANS>                                       120,403
<ALLOWANCE>                                       682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                145,264
<DEPOSITS>                                    118,931
<SHORT-TERM>                                    2,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               765
<LONG-TERM>                                     8,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          108
<OTHER-SE>                                     14,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                145,264
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 9,564
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               1,135
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               10,699
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              4,999
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,716
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           4,983
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     175
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 4,040
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,474
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      1,474
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      896
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.01
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.71
<LOANS-NON>                                       304
<LOANS-PAST>                                      189
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  582
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      79
<RECOVERIES>                                        4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 682
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              682
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantic Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:   December 14, 2009   /s/ Raffi Khorchidian---------------------------------
Raffi Khorchidian, 
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
# C_2009058EN.01001501.xml

| 12.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/15

---

Decision to close the formal investigation regarding the scheme ‘Regional aid for the transport of round wood’

(2009/C 58/10)

On 29 October 2008, the Authority decided to close the formal investigation procedure under Article 1(2) in Part I of Protocol 3 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice initiated on 11 June 2008 in respect of the Regional aid for the transport of round wood scheme recording that Norway had withdrawn its notification on 9 July 2008.

---