Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2005 / Notices 70065 

54. Mr. Roy A. Wallace, Director, 

Plans and Resources, Office of the 

Deputy Chief of Staff, G–1. 

55. Mr. Kenneth N. Williamson, Chief 

Executive Officer, U.S. Army Reserve 

Command. 

The members of the Performance 

Review Board for the Scientific and 

Technicals, are: 

1. Dr. Arthur D. Ballato, Senior 

Research Scientist (Electromagnetics), 

U.S. Army Communications and 

Electronics Research, Development and 

Engineering Center, U.S. Army Materiel 

Command. 

2. Dr. Walter Bryzik, Chief Scientist, 

U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research, 

U.S. Army Materiel Command. 

3. Dr. Kwong Kit Choi, Senior 

Research Scientist for Physical Sciences, 

U.S. Army Research Laboratory. 

4. Dr. Robert M. Engler, Senior 

Research Scientist (Environmental), U.S. 

Army Engineering Research and 

Development Center. 

5. Dr. Henry O. Everitt, III, Senior 

Research Scientist (Optical Sciences), 

U.S. Army Research, Development and 

Engineering Command. 

6. Dr. Richard Fong, Senior Research 

Scientist (Warheads Technology), U.S. 

Army Armament Research Development 

and Engineering Center. 

7. Dr. Grant R. Gerhart, Senior 

Research Scientist (Computer Modeling 

& Simulation), U.S. Army Tank 

Automotive Research Command. 

8. Dr. Claire C. Gordon, Senior 

Research Scientist (Biological 

Anthropology), Research, Development 

& Engineering Command. 

9. Dr. Shashi P. Karna, Senior 

Research Scientist (NanoFunctional 

Materials), U.S. Army Research 

Laboratory. 

10. Dr. Ellis L. Krinitzsky, Senior 

Research Scientist (Geoscience), U.S. 

Army Engineering Research and 

Development Center. 

11. Dr. Tomasz R. Letowski, Senior 

Research Scientist (Soldier 

Performance), U.S. Army Research 

Laboratory. 

12. Dr. Jester M. Loomis, Senior 

Research Scientist (Radio Frequency 

Sensors), U.S. Army Research 

Development and Engineering 

Command. 

13. Dr. Joseph N. Mait, Senior 

Research Scientist (Electromagnetics), 

U.S. Army Research Laboratory. 

14. Dr. James W. McCauley, Senior 

Research Engineer (Ceramic Materials), 

U.S. Army Research Laboratory. 

15. Dr. Robert W. McMillan, Senior 

Research Scientist (Research 

Applications), U.S. Army Space and 

Missiles Defense Command. 

16. Dr. Paul F. Mlakar, Senior 

Research Scientist (Weapons Effects/ 

Structural Dynamics) U.S. Army 

Engineering Research and Development 

Center. 

17. Dr. Nasser M. Nasrabadi, Senior 

Research Scientist (Sensors), U.S. Army 

Research Laboratory. 

18. Dr. John A. Parmentola, Director 

for Research and Laboratory 

Management, Office of the Assistant 

Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, 

Logistics and Technology). 

19. Dr. Arunachalam M. Rajendran, 

Senior Research Scientist (Applied 

Mechanics), U.S. Army Research 

Laboratory. 

20. Dr. James A. Ratches, Chief 

Scientist Night Vision Electro-Optics, 

U.S. Army Communications and 

Electronics Research. 

21. Dr. Jacques Reifman, Senior 

Research Scientist (Advanced Medical 

Technology), U.S. Army Medical 

Research and Medical Command. 

22. Dr. Donald T. Resio, Senior 

Research Scientists (Coastal 

Sedimentation), U.S. Army Engineering 

Research and Development Center. 

23. Dr. Paul B. Ruffin, Senior 

Research Physicist (Micro-Sensors and 

Systems), U.S. Army Research, 

Development and Engineering 

Command. 

24. Dr. Jose Luis Sagripanti, Research 

Scientist (Biochemistry), U.S. Army 

Edgewood Chemical Biological Center. 

25. Dr. Edward M. Schmidt, Senior 

Research Scientist (Ballistics Research), 

U.S. Army Research Laboratory. 

26. Dr. Michael P. Scully, Senior 

Research Engineer for Rotorcraft 

(Aerodynamics and Preliminary 

Design), U.S. Army Research, 

Development and Engineering 

Command. 

27. Dr. Paul H. Shen, Senior Research 

Scientist (Nuclear/Electronics 

Survivability, U.S. Army Research 

Laboratory. 

28. Dr. Brian R. Strickland, Chief 

Scientist (Directed Energy 

Applications), U.S. Army Space and 

Missile Defense Command. 

29. Dr. Mark B. Tischler, Senior 

Research Scientist (Rotorcraft Flight 

Dynamics and Control), U.S. Army 

Research, Development and Engineering 

Command. 

30. Dr. James J. Valdes, Scientific 

Advisor for Biotechnology, U.S. Army 

Edgewood Chemical Biological Center. 

31. Dr. Charles E. Wade, Senior 

Research Scientist Combat Casualty 

Care, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical 

Research. 

32. Dr. Billy J. Walker, Senior 

Research Scientist (Computational Fluid 

Dynamics), U.S. Army Research, 

Development and Engineering 

Command. 

33. Dr. Bruce J. West, Senior Research 

Scientist (Mathematical Sciences), U.S. 

Army Research Laboratory, Army 

Research Office. 

34. Dr. Thomas W. Wright, Senior 

Research Scientist (Terminal Ballistics), 

U.S. Army Research Laboratory. 

The members of the Performance 

Review Board for the Office of The 

Surgeon General, are: 

1. Mr. Brian Barr, Technical Director, 

U.S. Army Test and Evaluation 

Command. 

2. Dr. Zita M. Simutis, Director and 

Chief Psychologist, Army Research 

Institute, U.S. Army Human Resources 

Command. 

3. Mr. Ramon Suris-Fernandez, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army 

(Equal Employment Opportunity and 

Civil Rights), Office of the Assistant 

Secretary of the Army ( Manpower and 

Reserve Affairs). 

4. MG Joseph G. Webb, Deputy 

Commanding General, Office of The 

Surgeon General. 

Brenda S. Bowen, 

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05–23033 Filed 11–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3710–08–M 

DELAWARE RIVER BASIN 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Commission Meeting and 

Public Hearing 

Notice is hereby given that the 

Delaware River Basin Commission will 

hold an informal conference followed 

by a public hearing on Wednesday, 

December 7, 2005. The hearing will be 

part of the Commission’s regular 

business meeting. Both the conference 

session and business meeting are open 

to the public and will be held at the 

Commission’s office building, located at 

25 State Police Drive in West Trenton, 

New Jersey. 

The conference among the 

commissioners and staff will begin at 

10:30 a.m. Topics of discussion will 

include presentations on the water 

supply plan for the State of Delaware; 

the initial report of the Delaware Toxics 

Reduction Program (DelTRiP); a status 

report on the dwarf wedge mussel 

habitat study under way in the Upper 

Basin; a report on PCB Minimization 

Plan submissions to date; and 

discussion regarding the composition 

and charges of the Peer Review 

Advisory Committee to be established 

for the purpose of evaluating pollutant 

minimization plans (PMPs) submitted in 

accordance with section 4.30.9 of the 

Water Quality Regulations. 

70066 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2005 / Notices 

The subjects of the public hearing to 

be held during the 1:30 p.m. business 

meeting include the dockets listed 

below: 

1. North Penn Water Authority D–92–

44 CP–3. An application for the renewal 

of a ground water withdrawal project to 

continue withdrawal of 280 million 

gallons per thirty days (mg/30 days) to 

supply the applicant’s public water 

supply distribution system from 27 

existing production wells, 11 emergency 

wells and 1 test well and to limit the 

total cumulative withdrawal from the 

wells and the applicant’s Forest Park 

Potable Water Supply to 450 mg/30 

days. The project is located in the East 

Branch Perkiomen, Perkiomen, Indian, 

Skippack, West Branch Skippack, 

Zacharias, Towamencin, Wissahickon, 

Three Mile Run, North Branch 

Neshaminy, West Branch Neshaminy 

and Pine Run watersheds in Franconia 

Township, Skippack Township, Lower 

Salford Township, Souderton Borough, 

Towamencin Township, Worcester 

Township, Lansdale Borough, 

Montgomery Township, Upper 

Gwynedd Township, East Rockhill 

Township, New Britain Township, 

Hatfield Township, Hilltown Township 

and New Britain Borough in Bucks and 

Montgomery counties, Pennsylvania 

and is located in the Southeastern 

Pennsylvania Ground Water Protected 

Area. 

2. Perdue Farms Incorporated D–84–

15–3. An application for the renewal of 

a ground water withdrawal project to 

continue withdrawal of 33 mg/30 days 

to supply the applicant’s poultry 

processing facility from existing Wells 

Nos. 1 and 2 in the Minor Miocene Sand 

Formation. The project is located in the 

Mispillion River Watershed in the City 

of Milford, Kent County, Delaware. 

3. Harry T. Hudson D–84–31–3. An 

application for renewal of a ground 

water withdrawal project to continue to 

supply up to 19.55 mg/30 days of water 

from Well No. 1, screened in the 

Columbia Formation, for supplemental 

irrigation of the applicant’s 65-acre 

farm. The project is located in the Cedar 

Creek Watershed in Sussex County, 

Delaware. 

4. United States Department of the Air 

Force, Dover Air Force Base D–2000–5–

2. An application to replace the 

withdrawal of water from Well E in the 

applicant’s water supply system, which 

has become an unreliable source of 

supply. The applicant requests that the 

total combined withdrawal from 

replacement Well F and existing Wells 

A–2, B, C–2, D, HA–1 and HA–2 remain 

limited to 56 mg/30 days. The project is 

located in the Piney Point and 

Cheswold Formations in the St. Jones 

River Watershed in the City of Dover, 

Kent County, Delaware. 

5. Township of Maple Shade D–78–18 

CP–2. An application for approval of a 

ground water withdrawal project to 

supply up to 54.0 mg/30 days of water 

to the applicant’s public water supply 

distribution system from replacement 

Well No. 8A, and up to 54.0 mg/30 days 

from new Well No. 12 in the Middle and 

Lower Potomac—Raritan-Magothy 

Aquifers, respectively. No increase is 

proposed in the existing total allocation 

from all wells of 90 mg/30 days. The 

project is located in the Pennsauken 

Creek Watershed in Maple Shade 

Township, Burlington County, New 

Jersey. 

6. Borough of Elmer D–85–24 CP–4. 

An application for the renewal of a 

ground water withdrawal project to 

continue withdrawal of 10 mg/30 days 

to supply the applicant’s public water 

supply distribution system from existing 

Wells Nos. 6 and 8 in the Wenonah-Mt. 

Laurel Formation. The project is located 

in the Maurice River Watershed in the 

Borough of Elmer, Salem County, New 

Jersey. 

7. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and 

Company D–85–32–3. An application for 

the renewal of a ground water and 

surface water withdrawal project to 

reduce the ground water withdrawal 

from 57.3 mg/30 days to 45 mg/30 days 

to supply the applicant’s Repauno Plant 

from existing Wells Nos. 3R, 6 and 46 

in the Raritan-Magothy Formation, to 

retain the maximum surface water 

withdrawal from the existing intake in 

the tidal Delaware River of 700 mg/30 

days and to retain the combined 

maximum withdrawal for all sources at 

745 mg/30 days. The project is located 

in the Delaware River Watershed in 

Greenwich Township, Gloucester 

County, New Jersey. 

8. Pennsville Township Water 

Department D–2002–16 CP. An 

application for approval of a ground 

water withdrawal project to supply up 

to 18 mg/30 days of water to the 

applicant’s public water distribution 

system from new Wells Nos. 7 and 8 in 

the Lower and Upper Raritan 

Formation, respectively, and to retain 

the existing withdrawal from all wells to 

52.5 mg/30 days. The project is located 

in the Delaware River Watershed in 

Pennsville Township, Salem County, 

New Jersey. 

9. Pennsylvania American Water 

Company D–87–31 CP–3. An application 

for renewal of a ground water 

withdrawal project to continue to 

supply up to 14.5 mg/30 days to the 

applicant’s public water supply 

distribution system from existing Wells 

Nos. 1 through 5, located in the Catskill 

Formation. The project is located in the 

Hornbecks Creek Watershed in 

Delaware Township, Pike County, 

Pennsylvania in the drainage area of the 

Special Protection Waters. 

10. Waynesborough Country Club D–

92–9–2. An application for renewal of a 

ground water and surface water 

withdrawal project to continue to 

supply up to 6.0 mg/30 days of water for 

supplemental irrigation of the 

applicant’s golf course from two existing 

wells in the Wissahickon Formation. 

The project is located in the Crum Creek 

Watershed in Easttown Township, 

Chester County, Pennsylvania. 

11. Upper Frederick Township D–94–

57 CP–2. An application for the renewal 

of a ground water withdrawal project to 

continue withdrawal of 2.01 mg/30 days 

to supply the applicant’s public water 

supply system from existing Wells Nos. 

P–1 and P–2 in the Brunswick 

Formation. The project is located in the 

Goshenhoppen Creek Watershed in 

Upper Frederick Township, 

Montgomery County, Pennsylvania and 

is located in the Southeastern 

Pennsylvania Ground Water Protected 

Area. 

12. Pocono Farms Water Company D–

94–65 CP–2. An application for the 

renewal of a ground water withdrawal 

project to continue withdrawal of 15.75 

mg/30 days to supply the applicant’s 

public water supply distribution system 

from existing Wells Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 

7 in the Polar Gap Formation. The 

project is located in the Tobyhanna 

Creek Watershed in Coolbaugh 

Township, Monroe County, 

Pennsylvania. 

13. Jericho National Golf Course, Inc. 

D–95–2–2. An application for the 

renewal of a ground water and surface 

water withdrawal project to continue 

withdrawal of up to 9 mg/30 days to 

supply the applicant’s golf course 

irrigation system from existing Wells B–

100 and B–C in the Brunswick 

Formation. The ground water is pumped 

into a pond that also receives 

stormwater from the golf course, from 

which irrigation water is withdrawn as 

needed. The project is located in the 

Jericho Creek Watershed in Upper 

Makefield Township, Bucks County, 

Pennsylvania. 

14. Warren County (Pequest River) 

Municipal Utilities Authority D–71–94 

CP–3. An application to modify the 

existing docket to reflect modifications 

made to an existing 0.5 million gallon 

per day wastewater treatment plant 

(WWTP) to meet its National Pollutant 

Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) 

permit limits. The modifications 

consisted of the addition of advanced 

treatment facilities with no increase in 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2005 / Notices 70067 

treatment capacity. The WWTP is 

located at the northwest corner of the 

intersection of Delaware Drive and 

Greenwich Street in White Township, 

Warren County, New Jersey. The project 

will continue to serve the Town of 

Belvidere and a portion of White 

Township, both in Warren County, New 

Jersey. The WWTP continues to 

discharge to the Delaware River through 

the existing outfall, which is situated in 

the DRBC Special Protection Waters 

drainage of the Lower Delaware River 

Management Plan area. 

15. Sybron Chemicals, Inc. D–85–5–3. 

An application for the renewal of a 

ground water withdrawal project to 

decrease withdrawal from 77 mg/30 

days to 34 mg/30 days to supply the 

applicant’s industrial facility from 

existing Wells Nos. 4, 5 and EQ106 in 

the Middle Raritan and Mt. Laurel/ 

Wenonah Aquifers. The project is 

located in the West Branch Rancocas 

Watershed in Pemberton Township, 

Burlington County, New Jersey. 

16. Burlington Township D–99–50 CP–

2. An application for approval of a 

ground water withdrawal project to 

supply up to 43.2 mg/30 days of water 

to the applicant’s public water supply 

system from new Well No. 8 and to 

increase the existing withdrawal from 

all wells to 155 mg/30 days. The project 

is located in the Potomac-RaritanMagothy Formation in Burlington 

Township, Burlington County, New 

Jersey. 

17. City of Bordentown D–2004–11 CP. 

An application for approval of a ground 

water withdrawal project to increase 

withdrawal from 90 mg/30 days to 96 

mg/30 days to supply the applicant’s 

public water distribution system supply 

from existing Wells Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 5 

in the Potomac-Raritan-Magothy 

Formation in the Crosswicks Creek 

Watershed. The project is located in 

Hamilton Township, Mercer County; 

and in Bordentown Township and the 

City of Bordentown, Burlington County, 

all in New Jersey. 

18. Hackettstown Municipal Utilities 

Authority D–2004–23 CP–1. An 

application for approval of a ground and 

surface water withdrawal project to 

supply up to 44 mg/30 days of water to 

the applicant’s public supply 

distribution system from new Well No. 

7 in the Kittatinny Limestone 

Formation, and to increase the existing 

withdrawal from all sources to 115 mg/ 

30 days. The project is located in the 

Musconetcong River Watershed in the 

Town of Hackettstown, Warren County, 

New Jersey. 

9. Sunoco, Inc. D–69–115–2. An 

application to modify a refinery WWTP 

discharge to the tidal Schuylkill River 

near its confluence with the Delaware 

River in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 

The docket holder is upgrading air 

pollution control equipment at its 

Girard Point Philadelphia Refinery, and 

the proposed Wet Gas Scrubbing System 

will increase Total Dissolved Solids 

(TDS) in the WWTP discharge. The 

docket holder proposes to increase its 

dry weather tertiary treatment plant 

flow and TDS discharges from 3.5 

million gallons per day (mgd) and 

approximately 900 milligrams per liter 

(mg/l) respectively to 3.725 mgd and 

3,939 mg/l. In support of its requested 

modifications, the docket holder has 

submitted an environmental study that 

indicates that the proposed changes 

would result in no significant impact to 

the Delaware Estuary in Water Quality 

Zone 4. 

20. Pennsylvania Utility Company D–

75–93–3. An application to modify a 

WWTP service area approved by DRBC 

Docket No. D–74–93 CP (Revised) in 

order to allow the plant to utilize its full 

treatment capacity of 0.25 mgd and 

discharge the effluent to an unnamed 

tributary of Little Bush Kill in the 

drainage area of DRBC Special 

Protection Waters. The project is located 

at the Tamiment Resort and Country 

Club (the previous docket holder), off 

Old Bushkill Road in Lehman 

Township, Pike County, Pennsylvania. 

In addition to serving the Tamiment 

Resort, the project will serve the 

adjacent Mountain Laurel Center for the 

Performing Arts, also in Lehman 

Township. An upgrade of the WWTP’s 

nitrate control process is also proposed. 

The WWTP outfall was relocated, with 

Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection (PADEP) 

approval, to a point on locally known 

Pond Run, just downstream of First 

Pond on the former Unity House 

property. Spray application of WWTP 

effluent on the golf course at Tamiment 

Resort was approved by PADEP for 

periods when the weather and ground 

conditions are suitable. 

21. Mt. Airy #1, L.L.C. D–77–58–2. An 

application to modify a WWTP service 

area approved by DRBC Docket No. D–

77–58; to reduce the treatment capacity 

from 0.225 mgd to 0.220 mgd; and to 

discharge the effluent to Forest Hills 

Run in the drainage area of DBRC 

Special Protection Waters. The project is 

located at the former Mount Airy Lodge 

property in Paradise Township, Monroe 

County, Pennsylvania. In addition to 

serving the former resort, the project 

will also serve the adjacent Stricklands 

Mountain Inn and Our Lady of the 

Poconos Convent, also in Paradise 

Township. 

22. Melody Lakes Properties D–80–79–

2. An application to modify a WWTP 

docket to reduce the treatment capacity 

from 0.075 (mgd to 0.072 mgd and to 

continue to discharge the effluent to an 

unnamed tributary to Tohickon Creek in 

the drainage area of DRBC Special 

Protection Waters. The treatment plant 

serves the Melody Lakes Country Club 

Estates mobile home park only. The 

project is located in Richland 

Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. 

23. Lower Moreland Township 

Authority D–87–52 CP–2. An 

application to expand the 0.22 mgd 

Chapel Hill WWTP to process 0.279 

mgd. The existing advanced secondary 

treatment process will be upgraded to 

tertiary by the addition of a chemical 

treatment process to remove 

phosphorus. Following ultraviolet light 

disinfection, WWTP effluent will be 

discharged to an unnamed tributary of 

Southampton Creek, tributary to the 

Pennypack Creek through the existing 

outfall. The WWTP is located just south 

of the Pennsylvania Turnpike, near its 

intersection with County Line Road in 

Lower Moreland Township, 

Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. The 

WWTP will continue to serve portions 

of Lower Moreland Township, 

Montgomery County and Upper 

Southampton Township, Bucks County, 

both in Pennsylvania. 

24. Township of Amity D–90–78 CP–

2. An application to modify the existing 

docket to reflect modifications made to 

a WWTP to meet new NPDES permit 

limits and to handle wet weather flow 

surges. The WWTP has been modified to 

provide for an increase in treatment 

capacity from 1.6 mgd to 2.2 mgd. 

Ownership of the facility has been 

transferred from Amity Township 

Municipal Authority to the Township of 

Amity. The WWTP is located 

approximately one-half mile south of 

the intersection of U.S. Route 422 and 

State Route 662 in the southeast corner 

of Amity Township. In an effort to 

expedite the extension of sewer lines to 

local areas that are served by failing onlot septic systems, Amity Township has 

also requested an emergency action by 

the DRBC to approve rerating of the 

plant’s treatment capacity. The WWTP 

serves Amity, Earl, Douglass, Union and 

Exeter Townships, all in Berks County, 

Pennsylvania. The WWTP provides 

advanced treatment of wastewater and 

discharges to the Schuylkill River in an 

area conditionally designated by DRBC 

as ‘‘Modified Recreational’’. 

25. Delaware Valley College D–94–50 

CP–2. An application for the renewal of 

a ground water withdrawal project to 

increase withdrawal from 3 mg/30 days 

to 6.135 mg/30 days to supply the 

70068 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2005 / Notices 

applicant’s college community supply 

distribution system and irrigation 

demands from existing Wells Nos. 1, 3, 

4, 5 and 6 and new Well No. 7 in the 

Neshaminy Creek Watershed. The 

project is located in Doylestown 

Township and New Britain Borough, 

Bucks County, Pennsylvania and is 

located in the Southeastern 

Pennsylvania Ground Water Protected 

Area. 

26. Doylestown Township Municipal 

Authority D–95–9 CP–2. An application 

for approval of an increase in ground 

water withdrawal from 45.9 mg/30 days 

to 51.0 mg/30 days of water to the 

applicant’s public water supply 

distribution system from 14 existing 

wells, all located in the Stockton 

Formation. The project is located in the 

Neshaminy Creek and Pine Run 

watersheds in Doylestown Township, 

Bucks County, in the Southeastern 

Pennsylvania Ground Water Protected 

Area. 

27. Nestle Waters North America, Inc. 

D–98–27–2. A spring water renewal 

project to continue withdrawal of 9.0 

mg/30 days to supply the applicant’s 

bottled water operations from Hoffman 

Springs Nos. 1, 2 and 3 in the 

Ontelaunee Creek Watershed. This 

project further provides for a change in 

the operating passby flow condition and 

monitoring requirements associated 

with the withdrawal. The project is 

located in Lynn Township, Lehigh 

County, Pennsylvania. (This was NAR’d 

as D–98–27 Renewal.) 

28. Pennsylvania American Water 

Company D–98–43 CP–2. An application 

for approval of a ground water 

withdrawal project to supply up to 

34.56 mg/30 days of water to the 

applicant’s Penn Water District public 

water supply distribution system from 

new Well No. 28 in the Epler and 

Ontelaunee Formations, and to increase 

the combined allocation for all wells 

from 127 mg/30 days to 160.0 mg/30 

days. The project includes 12 existing 

wells and an interconnection with the 

Western Berks Water Authority (0.9 mgd 

capacity). The project is located in the 

Little Cacoosing Creek Watershed in 

Lower Heidelberg Township; the 

Cacoosing Creek Watershed in Sinking 

Spring Borough, South Heidelberg and 

Spring townships; the Tulpehocken 

Creek Watershed in Spring Township; 

and the Wyomissing Creek Watershed in 

Spring Township, all in Berks County, 

Pennsylvania. 

29. East Marlborough Township D–

2000–43 CP–2. An application to rerate 

a 0.29 mgd sewage treatment plant 

(STP) to its design capacity of 0.44 mgd, 

while continuing to provide secondary 

level of treatment. The rerated plant will 

continue to serve predominately 

residential customers in East 

Marlborough Township and Kennett 

Township, both in Chester County, 

Pennsylvania. The STP is located north 

of Street Road (Route 926), 

approximately 1,500 feet west of Route 

82 in East Marlborough Township. 

Nearby spray irrigation fields will 

continue to be used for STP effluent 

discharge. The project is located in the 

drainage area of the West Branch Red 

Clay Creek in DRBC Water Quality Zone 

C5, but no surface water discharge is 

proposed. 

30. Mount Pocono Municipal 

Authority D–2001–51 CP. An 

application to expand a 0.4 mgd STP to 

process 0.6 mgd and continue to 

provide tertiary level treatment via the 

sequencing batch reactor process and 

filtration. The plant will continue to 

serve Mount Pocono Borough and a 

portion of Coolbaugh Township, both in 

Monroe County, Pennsylvania. Because 

the project is located in the drainage 

area to the Delaware River Basin 

Commission (DRBC) Special Protection 

Waters, a nonpoint source pollution 

control plan is required. STP effluent 

will continue to discharge to Forest 

Hills Run in the Paradise Creek 

Watershed, about 1,000 feet upstream of 

the State Route 611 bridge in Mount 

Pocono Borough. 

31. Alfred Moor, III D–2005–21–1. An 

application for approval of a ground 

water withdrawal project to supply up 

to 98.5 mg/30 days of water to the 

applicant’s agricultural irrigation project 

from Wells Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 

9 in the Cheswold Formation. The water 

will be used to irrigate approximately 

605 acres of corn, soybeans and wheat. 

The project is located in the Leipsic 

River Watershed in the Town of 

Smyrna, Kent County, Delaware. 

32. Elk Township Municipal Utilities 

Authority D–99–75 CP. An application 

for approval of a ground water 

withdrawal project to supply up to 7.45 

mg/30 days of water to the applicant’s 

public water supply distribution system 

from new Wells Nos. 1 and 2 in the 

Cohansey Formation. The project is 

located in Elk Township, Gloucester 

County, New Jersey. 

33. Borough of Buena Municipal 

Utilities Authority D–2002–37 CP. An 

application for approval of a ground 

water withdrawal project to supply up 

to 17.23 mg/30 days of water to the 

applicant’s public water supply 

distribution system from new Well No. 

3 in the Piney Point Formation. The 

project well is located at the headwaters 

of Cedar Branch Creek, Maurice River 

Watershed in Buena Borough, Atlantic 

County, New Jersey. 

34. Kresson Golf Course D–2002–39. 

An application to withdraw up to 5.9 

million gallons/month from Cedar Lake 

on Barton Run in the Southwest Branch 

Rancocas Creek Watershed. A yearly 

restriction of 22 million gallons will 

also be imposed by the New Jersey 

Department of Environmental Protection 

(NJDEP) for irrigation of approximately 

57 acres of the golf course via its 

existing surface water intake. The golf 

course is located 1.5 miles north of the 

intersection of State Route 73 and 

Cooper Road in Voorhees Township, 

Camden County, New Jersey. 

35. Resorts USA, Inc. D–96–9 CP. An 

application for approval of a ground 

water withdrawal project to supply up 

to 15.98 mg/30 days of water to the 

applicant’s Fernwood water system 

from new Well No. 9, and to increase 

the existing withdrawal limit of 9.8 mg/ 

30 days from all wells to 18.4 mg/30 

days. The project is located in the 

Bushkill Watershed in Middle 

Smithfield Township, Monroe County, 

Pennsylvania. 

36. Woodbridge Golf Club, Inc. D–

2005–5–1. An application for approval 

of a ground water withdrawal project to 

supply up to 4.3 mg/30 days of water for 

supplemental irrigation of the 

applicant’s proposed golf course from 

New Wells IW–1, IW–3, IW–4 and IW–

5, all in the Weisenberg Member 

Formation. In conjunction with the 

ground water withdrawal, the golf 

course will also utilize supplemental 

irrigation from stormwater collected in 

three on-site storage ponds. The project 

is located in the Schaefer Run 

Watershed in Maxatawny Township, 

Berks County and Weisenberg 

Township, Lehigh County, 

Pennsylvania. The project is located 

within the drainage area of DRBC 

Special Protection Waters. 

In addition to the public hearing on 

the dockets listed above, the 

Commission’s 1:30 p.m. business 

meeting will include public hearings 

pertaining to: A resolution amending 

the Basin Regulations—Water Supply 

Charges regarding certificates of 

entitlement; a resolution renaming the 

Flow Management Technical Advisory 

Committee and modifying its 

membership, and a resolution to 

Approve the Commission’s FY 2007 

Budget and Work Plan. The Commission 

also will consider resolutions: Directing 

the Executive Director to secure from 

the Regional Administrators of EPA 

Regions 2 and 3 their written 

concurrence as to the Zone 6 and Stage 

2 water quality endpoints for the PCB 

TMDLs for the Delaware Estuary; 

extending the Commission’s agreement 

with the Northeast-Midwest Institute for 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 223 / Monday, November 21, 2005 / Notices 70069 

outreach to federal legislators; amending 

the Commission’s investment policy 

statement of July 2001 to provide for 

investment in emerging international 

markets; and authorizing the Executive 

Director to engage a firm to evaluate the 

Commission’s heating, ventilating, air 

conditioning and other power systems 

in order to identify and evaluate 

opportunities for improving efficiency 

and reducing cost. 

The meeting will also include: 

Adoption of the Minutes of the 

September 26, 2005 business meeting; 

announcements; a report on basin 

hydrologic conditions; a report by the 

executive director; a report by the 

Commission’s general counsel; and an 

opportunity for public dialogue. Draft 

dockets and the resolutions scheduled 

for public hearing on December 7, 2005 

will be posted on the Commission’s 

Web site, http://www.drbc.net, where 

they can be accessed through the Notice 

of Commission Meeting and Public 

Hearing. Additional documents relating 

to the dockets and other items may be 

examined at the Commission’s offices. 

Please contact William Muszynski at 

609–883–9500, extension 221, with any 

docket-related questions. 

Individuals in need of an 

accommodation as provided for in the 

Americans with Disabilities Act who 

wish to attend the informational 

meeting, conference session or hearings 

should contact the commission 

secretary directly at 609–883–9500 ext. 

203 or through the Telecommunications 

Relay Services (TRS) at 711, to discuss 

how the Commission may accommodate 

your needs. 

Dated: November 14, 2005. 

Pamela M. Bush, 

Commission Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05–22942 Filed 11–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6360–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The Leader, Information 

Management Case Services Team, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of the Chief Information 

Officer invites comments on the 

submission for OMB review as required 

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before 

December 21, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments should 

be addressed to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention: Rachel Potter, Desk Officer, 

Department of Education, Office of 

Management and Budget, 725 17th 

Street, NW., Room 10222, New 

Executive Office Building, Washington, 

DC 20503 or faxed to (202) 395–6974. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. OMB may amend or 

waive the requirement for public 

consultation to the extent that public 

participation in the approval process 

would defeat the purpose of the 

information collection, violate State or 

Federal law, or substantially interfere 

with any agency’s ability to perform its 

statutory obligations. The Leader, 

Information Management Case Services 

Team, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of the 

Chief Information Officer, publishes that 

notice containing proposed information 

collection requests prior to submission 

of these requests to OMB. Each 

proposed information collection, 

grouped by office, contains the 

following: (1) Type of review requested, 

e.g. new, revision, extension, existing or 

reinstatement; (2) Title; (3) Summary of 

the collection; (4) Description of the 

need for, and proposed use of, the 

information; (5) Respondents and 

frequency of collection; and (6) 

Reporting and/or Recordkeeping 

burden. OMB invites public comment. 

Dated: November 15, 2005. 

Angela C. Arrington, 

Leader, Information Management Case 

Services Team, Regulatory Information 

Management Services, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

Federal Student Aid 

Type of Review: Extension. 

Title: Federal Direct Consolidation 

Loan Program Application Documents. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

household; businesses or other forprofit. 

Reporting and Recordkeeping Hour 

Burden: 

Responses: 920,714. 

Burden Hours: 680,480. 

Abstract: These forms are the means 

by which an applicant applies for and 

promises to repay a Federal Direct 

Consolidation Loan and a lender verifies 

that a loan is eligible to be consolidated. 

Requests for copies of the information 

collection submission for OMB review 

may be accessed from http:// 

edicsweb.ed.gov, by selecting the 

‘‘Browse Pending Collections’’ link and 

by clicking on link number 2838. When 

you access the information collection, 

click on ‘‘Download Attachments ‘‘ to 

view. Written requests for information 

should be addressed to U.S. Department 

of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue, 

SW., Potomac Center, 9th Floor, 

Washington, DC 20202–4700. Requests 

may also be electronically mailed to the 

Internet address OCIO_RIMG@ed.gov or 

faxed to 202–245–6623. Please specify 

the complete title of the information 

collection when making your request. 

Comments regarding burden and/or 

the collection activity requirements 

should be directed to Joseph Schubart at 

his e-mail address Joe.Schubart@ed.gov. 

Individuals who use a 

telecommunications device for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–

8339. 

[FR Doc. 05–22976 Filed 11–18–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

AGENCY: Department of Education. 

SUMMARY: The Leader, Information 

Management Case Services Team, 

Regulatory Information Management 

Services, Office of the Chief Information 

Officer invites comments on the 

submission for OMB review as required 

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995. 

DATES: Interested persons are invited to 

submit comments on or before 

December 21, 2005. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments should 

be addressed to the Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention: Rachel Potter, Desk Officer, 

Department of Education, Office of 

Management and Budget, 725 17th 

Street, NW., Room 10222, New 

Executive Office Building, Washington, 

DC 20503 or faxed to (202) 395–6974. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3506 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) requires 

that the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) provide interested 

Federal agencies and the public an early 

opportunity to comment on information 

collection requests. OMB may amend or 

waive the requirement for public 

consultation to the extent that public 

participation in the approval process 

would defeat the purpose of the 

information collection, violate State or 

Federal law, or substantially interfere