alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [FDA 225-07-7001]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is providing notice of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between FDA and the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO).  The purpose of this MOU is to facilitate FDA's collaboration with AAFCO in the AAFCO New and Modified Ingredient Definition Process by clarifying the responsibilities of FDA and AAFCO in defining feed ingredients, in providing mechanisms for resolving disputes that may arise, and in providing mechanisms for modifying the ingredient definition process when required.

# DATES:

 The agreement became effective August 30, 2007.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Sharon Benz, Division of Animal Feeds (HFV-220), Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD  20855, 240-453-6864.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with 21 CFR 20.108(c), which states that all written agreements and MOUs between FDA and others shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    , the agency is publishing notice of this MOU.                

Dated: November 12, 2007.

Randall W. Lutter,

Deputy Commissioner for Policy.

      ( print page 65043)          ( print page 65044)          ( print page 65045)          ( print page 65046)    

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S

[FR Doc. 07-5748 Filed 11-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-C
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          46,604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  575,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,939,966
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               382,644
<PP&E>                                      11,682,800
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,810,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,816,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,510,038
<BONDS>                                      4,977,708
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,383,334
<OTHER-SE>                                  (9,054,220)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,816,600
<SALES>                                      6,993,856
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,993,856
<CGS>                                        5,033,679
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,033,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             644,558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (148,929)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (148,829)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (148,829)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)


</TABLE>
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 13 Filed 12/06/10 Page 1 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 13 Filed 12/06/10 Page 2 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 13 Filed 12/06/10 Page 3 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 13 Filed 12/06/10 Page 4 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 13 Filed 12/06/10 Page 5 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 13 Filed 12/06/10 Page 6 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 13 Filed 12/06/10 Page 7 of 8
Case 5:10-cv-00205-RS -MD Document 13 Filed 12/06/10 Page 8 of 8
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SIDNEY MARTS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv143-RH/EMT

JOEY BASHFORD et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (ECF No. 7) and the objections (ECF No. 8). I have reviewed de

novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration, 

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is dismissed

without prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on July 31, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CORY T. PERRY,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv281/MCR/EMT

WALTER McNEIL, et al.,

Defendants. 

___________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated December 10, 2010. (Doc. 34). Plaintiff has been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (doc. 30) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of February, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
##### 



EXHIBIT 14
 CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS OF
OHIO LEGACY CORP
  I. Honest and Ethical Conduct
  
    
    Encourage and reward professional integrity in all aspects of the financial
organization by eliminating inhibitions and barriers to responsible behavior, such as
coercion and fear of reprisal, with respect to reporting any matters contrary to
Company policy.
    
    Prohibit and eliminate the appearance or occurrence of conflicts between
what is in the best interest of the Company and what could result in material personal
gain for an employee of the Company, including Senior Financial Officers.
    
    Provide a mechanism for employees of the Company to inform the Board of
Directors or a committee appointed by the Board of deviations in practice from policies
and procedures governing honest and ethical behavior.
    
    Demonstrate their personal support for such policies and procedures through
periodic communication reinforcing these ethical standards throughout the Company.
 II. Financial Records and Periodic Reports
  
    
    Business transactions are properly authorized and completely, timely and
accurately recorded on the Companys books and records in accordance with Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), Rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, regulatory requirements and established Company policies.
    
    The retention or proper disposal of Company records shall be in accordance
with established Company financial policies and applicable legal and regulatory
requirements.
    
    Periodic financial communications and reports will be delivered in a manner
that facilitates the highest degree of clarity of content and meaning so that readers
and users will quickly and accurately determine their significance and consequence.




---



##### 



III. Compliance with Applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations
  
    
    Educate members of the Company about any federal, state or local statute, regulation
or administrative procedure that affects the financial reporting operations of the
Company.
    
    Monitor the compliance of the finance affairs of the Company with any
applicable federal, state or local statute, regulation or administrative rule.
    
    Identify, report and correct in a swift and certain manner, any detected
deviations from applicable federal, state or local statute or regulation.
 IV. Accountability for Adherence to the Code of Conduct




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 235 (Friday, December 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 69220]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5970]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel, Cardiovascular Program Project.
    Date: January 23, 2008.
    Time: 2:30 p.m. to 4:40 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Holly Patton, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7188, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 
301-435-0280, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cbbbaabfbfa4a5a38ba5a3a7a9a2e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c6c7d68687372745c7274707e75327b736a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 29, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5970 Filed 12-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2009142EN.01000301.xml

| 23.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/3

---

CALL FOR PROPOSALS — EAC/26/2009

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Evidence based-policy and practice: call for proposals to develop networks of knowledge brokerage initiatives

2009/C 142/04

1.   Objectives and Description

Objectives and Description

This Call for Proposals will support international cooperation in the development of ‘knowledge brokerage’ mechanisms in the field of education and training. These mechanisms are intended to strengthen the links between research, policy and practice. Their main role is to make the results of research on education and training understandable and accessible and to bring research to the attention of policy and decision-makers and practitioners.

2.   Eligible applicants

Eligible applicants

The following call is opened to Ministries of education, other public bodies, research centres and universities, foundations, associations.

Applicants must be established in one of the following countries:

| — | EU Member States, |
| --- | --- |

—

EU Member States,

| — | EFTA countries which are members of EEA: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, |
| --- | --- |

—

EFTA countries which are members of EEA: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway,

| — | candidate countries: Turkey. |
| --- | --- |

—

candidate countries: Turkey.

3.   Budget and project duration

Budget and project duration

The total budget earmarked for the cofinancing of projects amounts to 500 000 EUR. Financial assistance from the Commission cannot exceed 75 % of the total eligible costs. Each grant will amount to around EUR 165 000.

Activities must start between December 2009 and February 2010. Activities must end before March 2011. The maximum duration of projects is 12 months.

4.   Deadline

Deadline

Applications must be sent to the Commission no later than 25 September 2009.

5.   Further information

Further information

The full text of the call for proposals and the application forms are available in English, French and German on the following website: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_culture/calls/grants_en.html

Applications must comply with the requirements set out in the full text and be submitted using the form provided.

---
# C_2010038EN.01000102.xml

| 16.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5652 — GIP/Gatwick Airport)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 38/02

On 26 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5652. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5652. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

NICHOLAS VAUGHN,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-217-RS-MD

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 

37). No objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is 

DENIED.

3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on December 8, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00217-RS-MD Document 38 Filed 12/08/11 Page 1 of 1
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

Letter Agreement 

Between 
 AGCO Corporation

 Duluth, Georgia, USA 

and 
 Tractors and Farm
Equipment Limited 
 Chennai, India 

This sets out the agreement of Tractors and Farm Equipment Limited (“TAFE”) on behalf of itself and its shareholders (other than AGCO) and AGCO
Corporation (“AGCO”) to create safeguards to mitigate the possible consequences of ownership changes to either TAFE/ its shareholders or AGCO. The expressions TAFE and AGCO include their respective successors, successors in business, group
companies and permitted assigns. 
 The parties have identified the various risks and have concluded that the following scenarios require pre-determined
action options to be put in place: 
  

	 	1.	Change in beneficial ownership of AGCO; 

  

	 	2.	Acquisition by AGCO of/ merger with a competitor with existing interests in India. 

 In view of the above and
without prejudice to the respective legal rights and remedies available to either party under existing agreements, the parties agree: 
  

	1.	AGCO CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP 

 In the event that a competitor of TAFE (i) acquires a
minimum 15% stake or control in AGCO and holds one directorship at the board level; or (ii) becomes the single largest holder of shares (with or without voting or management rights) in ACGO and holds one directorship at the board level: 

 

	 	(a)	the Shareholders of TAFE (other than AGCO) shall have the right to purchase AGCO’s entire shareholding in TAFE at a price to be mutually agreed upon; 


 

	 	(b)	TAFE will also have the right to purchase the Massey Ferguson marks for use in India, Nepal and Bhutan again at a value to be mutually agreed upon. Notwithstanding, AGCO will grant a free-of-charge three year License to
use such marks to TAFE in order to allow TAFE a structured brand name transition and during the said period, the proprietor of the marks used by TAFE shall not use the said mark(s) in the said territories; and 









	 	(c)	At TAFE’s option, AGCO shall extend all current valid distribution arrangements with TAFE for up to three years (as determined by TAFE) from the date of the triggering event. 


 

	2.	AGCO ACQUISITION OF/MERGER WITH A COMPETITOR 

 In the event that AGCO acquires, and/ or
merges with, a competitor with existing interests in India, then without prejudice to the rights of TAFE, the rights as set out in 1 above and prior to completion of such acquisition, will be triggered also. 

 

									
	TRACTORS AND FARM EQUIPMENT LIMITED	 		 	AGCO CORPORATION
					
	By:	 	/s/ Mallika Srinivasan	 		 	By:	 	/s/ D. Lupton
	Its:	 	Director	 		 	Its:	 	SVP & General Counsel
	  
	 	  
	 		 	Date:	 	23 July 2007
	By:	 	/s/ Mallika Srinivasan	 		 	  
	 	  

	Its:	 	Shareholder	 		 	  
	 	  

	Date:	 	3rd August ‘07	 		 	  
	 	  


  
  
  

 
  

					
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	
		 		 	


  
 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:09cv388/EMT

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF 

MARYLAND, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter, as to which the parties have consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, is before

the court on the Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Plaintiff and signed by all parties who have

appeared (Doc. 30). According to the notification, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the

parties stipulate the dismissal of this action with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs

except as otherwise agreed by the parties (id.). 

As Plaintiff is entitled to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the

above-titled action is DISMISSED, with prejudice. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of March 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
# C_2009196EN.01000601.xml

| 20.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/6

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2009/C 196/06

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Belgium

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Belgium

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. The Commission publishes all new euro coin designs with a view to informing all parties required to handle coins in the course of their work as well as the public at large (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), the Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national side features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Belgium

Subject of commemoration: Bicentenary of the birth of Louis Braille (1809-1852)

Description of the design: The inner part of the coin features a portrait of Louis Braille between his initials, L and B, in the alphabet that he designed. Above the portrait is the legend ‘LOUIS BRAILLE’, and underneath is the issuing country reference, ‘BE’, between the dates 1809 and 2009. To the left and right respectively are the mint mark and the signature mark of the Master of the Mint.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 5 million

Date of issue: September 2009

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, pp. 1-30 for the national sides of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, pp. 52-55).

2

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PENSACOLA MOTOR SALES,

a Florida corporation, d/b/a

BOB TYLER TOYOTA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:09cv571/RS-MD

EASTERN SHORE TOYOTA, LLC,

an Alabama Limited Liability Company;

DAPHNE AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, an

Alabama Limited Liability Company;

SHAWN ESFAHANI, Individually;

and DAPHNE ENTERPRISES, INC.,

an Alabama Corporation,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Defendant’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 150) is denied.

ORDERED on September 24, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE