alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009284EN.01002801.xml

| 25.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/28

---

Call for proposals under the 2010 work programme ‘People’ of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

2009/C 284/08

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the 2010 work programme ‘People’ of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call. Call deadline and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website.

‘People’ Specific Programme:

‘People’ Specific Programme:

| Call Title | Call Identifier |
| --- | --- |
| International Research Staff Exchange Scheme | FP7-PEOPLE-2010-IRSES |

Call Title

Call Identifier

International Research Staff Exchange Scheme

FP7-PEOPLE-2010-IRSES

This call for proposals relates to the 2010 work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2009) 5892 of 29 July 2009.

This call for proposals relates to the 2010 work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2009) 5892 of 29 July 2009.

Information on the modalities of the call, the work programme, and the guide for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
Case 4:10-cv-00328-RH -WCS Document 1-1 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 8
Case 4:10-cv-00328-RH -WCS Document 1-1 Filed 08/05/10 Page 2 of 8
Case 4:10-cv-00328-RH -WCS Document 1-1 Filed 08/05/10 Page 3 of 8
Case 4:10-cv-00328-RH -WCS Document 1-1 Filed 08/05/10 Page 4 of 8
Case 4:10-cv-00328-RH -WCS Document 1-1 Filed 08/05/10 Page 5 of 8
Case 4:10-cv-00328-RH -WCS Document 1-1 Filed 08/05/10 Page 6 of 8
Case 4:10-cv-00328-RH -WCS Document 1-1 Filed 08/05/10 Page 7 of 8
Case 4:10-cv-00328-RH -WCS Document 1-1 Filed 08/05/10 Page 8 of 8
# C_2010125EN.01000701.xml

| 13.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 May 2010

2010/C 125/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2686 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,06 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4418 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84940 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5781 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4062 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,7865 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,390 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,76 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7082 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9707 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1740 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9352 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4143 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2890 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8710 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7648 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7505 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 450,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,4748 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6611 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2630 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 575,72 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0690 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,140 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,0277 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,976 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2589 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,7655 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 57,2390 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2686

JPY

Japanese yen

118,06

DKK

Danish krone

7,4418

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84940

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5781

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4062

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,7865

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,390

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,76

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7082

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9707

RON

Romanian leu

4,1740

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9352

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4143

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2890

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8710

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7648

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7505

KRW

South Korean won

1 450,91

ZAR

South African rand

9,4748

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6611

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2630

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 575,72

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0690

PHP

Philippine peso

57,140

RUB

Russian rouble

38,0277

THB

Thai baht

40,976

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2589

MXN

Mexican peso

15,7655

INR

Indian rupee

57,2390

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JONATHAN LEE RICHES, 

BERNARD MADOFF,

Plaintiffs,

vs. Case No. 4:09cv323-SPM/WCS

BYRD BILLINGS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Plaintiffs have attempted to submit a civil rights complaint. Doc.1. The two

Plaintiffs are not located at the same institution and could not have signed the complaint

one day apart. Doc. 1, p. 2. The allegations are, more importantly, frivolous and

fanciful. Should Plaintiffs seek to litigate this case, they must do so separately. Two

prisoners may not combine a case for the purpose of paying only one filing fee.

Further, Plaintiffs did not pay the filing fee for this case, nor did they submit an in

forma pauperis motion. The Clerk will be directed to provide this order to Plaintiff

Jonathan Lee Riches, the most likely author of the document filed in this case. It is

highly doubtful that Bernard Madoff signed this complaint. Should Plaintiff Riches have

Case 4:09-cv-00323-SPM-WCS Document 3 Filed 09/08/09 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 4:09cv323-SPM/WCS

allegations to present of a constitutional violation, Plaintiff may file an amended

complaint in this case. Plaintiff Riches must simultaneously submit either the filing fee

or file an in forma pauperis motion, supported by the required financial affidavit. Plaintiff

must honestly disclose all prior cases he has filed, and Plaintiff must use the complaint

form provided to him. Finally, if Plaintiff cannot demonstrate how this case should

proceed in the Northern District of Florida, Plaintiff should file a notice of voluntary

dismissal pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a). Such a notice should also be carefully

considered if Plaintiff is unable to present more than a fanciful description of events

which are untrue and frivolous, and waste the Court's time.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Clerk of Court is directed to forward to Plaintiff Jonathan Lee Riches a §

1331 civil rights complaint form and in forma pauperis packet for federal prisoners so

that Plaintiff can file the amended complaint as explained above.

2. Plaintiff shall have until October 9, 2009, to file an amended civil rights

complaint, which shall be typed or clearly written and submitted on court forms, and

either pay the filing fee for this case or submit a completed in forma pauperis motion

and financial affidavit with the required inmate bank account information.

3. Alternatively, Plaintiff should file a notice of voluntary dismissal by October 9,

2009.

4. Failure to comply with this Court order may result in a recommendation

of dismissal of this action.

Case 4:09-cv-00323-SPM-WCS Document 3 Filed 09/08/09 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 4:09cv323-SPM/WCS

5. The Clerk of Court shall return this file to me upon receipt of Plaintiff's

compliance with this order or no later than October 9, 2009.

DONE AND ORDERED on September 8, 2009.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:09-cv-00323-SPM-WCS Document 3 Filed 09/08/09 Page 3 of 3
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
C ESAR Y. C A TIB AYAN, a

U.S. c itiz e n, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt,
v. SYC IP GORRES VELAYO & C O., (SGV), a PhilippineAc c o unting Firm , AKA SGV/Ernst & Young, (SGV/EY), De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-35989 D.C . No. 3:13-c v-00273-HU
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ore gon M arc o A
. He rnande z , Distric t Judge , Pre siding

Subm itte d

June 22, 2015 ** B e fore : HAW K INS, GR AB ER , a nd W . FLETC H ER , C irc uit Judge s . C e sa r Y. C atiba

y an a ppe a ls pro se from the distric t c o urt’ s judgm e nt dism issing his dive

rsity a c tion for la c k

of pe rsona l jurisdic tion ove r Sy C ip Gorre s Ve la y o & C o. (“ SGV” ). W e have jurisdic t ion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w 

# FIL ED JUL 01 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).de novo, Pic ot v . W e s ton , 780 F.3d 1206, 1211 (9th C ir. 2015), a nd we a ffirm
. The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d C atiba

y an’ s a c tion for la c k of pe rsona l jurisdic tion be c a

use C atiba

y an fa ile d to e sta

blish tha t SGV ha d suffic ie nt c onta c ts with Ore gon suc h tha

t m a inte na

nc e of the suit the re would not offend due proc e ss. Se e O r. R . C iv. P. 4(L); W alde n v . Fiore , 134 S. C t . 1115, 1121-23 (2014) (spe c i fic jurisdic tion re quire s a

de fe nda nt to ha ve c e rta in m inim

um c onta c ts with the

forum sta te ); Mav rix

Photo, Inc . v . Brand Te c hs., Inc
. , 647 F.3d 1218, 1223-24 (9th C ir. 2011) (ge ne ra l jurisdic tion re quire s a de fe nda nt to ha ve “ c ontinuous a

nd sy ste m atic ge ne ra l busine ss c onta c ts” with theforum sta te (c ita tion a nd inte rna l quota t ion m arks om itte d)); Gray & C o. v . Firste nbe rg Mac hine ry C o. , 913 F.2d 758, 760 (9th C ir. 1990) (pe r c uriam ) (Ore gon’ s long-a rm sta tute a llows for jurisdic tion ove r non-re side nts c oe x te nsive with dueproc e s s re quire m e nts). W e do not c onside r doc um e nts a nd fa c ts not pre se nte d to thedistric t c ourt. Se eUnite d State

s v . Elias , 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th C ir. 1990) (“ D oc um e nts or fa c ts not pre se nte d to thedistric t c o urt a re not pa rt of the re c ord on a

ppe a l.” ). C atiba y an’ s m otion to e xpe dite is de n ie d a s m oot. C atiba y an’ s m otion for a

ppointm e nt of c ounse l is de n ie d. AFFIRM E D.

1 3
- 3 5 9 8 9 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dmitry Lyakutin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Onyx China, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Madero, Inc.


Date: May 5, 2008                     By: /s/ Dmitry Lyakutin
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Dmitry Lyakutin
                                      Title: Chief Executive & Financial Officer
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

VICKI WILLIMS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:09cv339-RH/WCS

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 7). No objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “This case is DISMISSED.” The

clerk must close the file. 

SO ORDERED on October 23, 2009.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Richard L. Seech :

:

v. : No. 1417 C.D. 2017

:

Gateway School District, :

Appellant :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, January 25, 2021, having considered Appellee’s application for 

reargument, the application is denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

AMANDA MICHELLE NIX,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ROLLING HILLS MANAGEMENT

GROUP, LLC, SOUTH PALAFOX

PROPERTIES, LLC and EDWARD

CROWN,

 Defendants. 

3:10cv303/MCR/CJK

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The parties have filed a Joint Motion for Dismissal (doc. 48) requesting entry

of an order dismissing all claims in this matter, with prejudice, on the grounds that the

parties have reached an amicable compromise. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That the parties’ Joint Motion for Dismissal (doc. 48) be GRANTED.

2. That all claims in this matter be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant

to the parties’ agreement.

3. That the clerk be directed to close the file

At Pensacola, Florida this 15th day of March, 2012.

/s/ Charles J. Kahn, Jr. CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00303-MCR-CJK Document 49 Filed 03/15/12 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 117 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 431.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 August 1972.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7314

MICHAEL EUGENE TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BOBBY LANE; ROBERT POPE; JAMES SCHAFERS; CAREY

WINDERS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-624-5-CT-BO)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 7, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Eugene Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. E.B. Borden Parker,

BADDOUR, PARKER, HINE & WELLONS, Goldsboro, North Carolina; Rudolph

Alexander Ashton, III, MCCOTTER, MCAFEE & ASHTON, P.L.L.C., New

Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Taylor appeals the district court's order granting summary

judgment to defendants on Taylor’s 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.

1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion. The district court properly found that there was

no genuine issue of material fact and defendants were entitled to

judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Lane, No. CA-97-624-5-CT-BO

(E.D.N.C. July 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:06-cv-14983-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### IN RE CLAY COUNTY GENERAL ELECTION

No. 143 PC.

Case below: 45 N.C. App. 556.

Petition by petitioners for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 14 April 1980.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of AEI Income & Growth Fund
XXII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB  for
the  period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 24, 2008



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 24, 2008
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DANNY RAY WALLACE,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:09-cv-00245-RH-GRJ

BRAD SEGREE, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff brings this cause of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 alleging

excessive use of force by several jail employees at the Franklin County Jail on

November 9, 2007. (Doc. 6, at 5.) Plaintiff also claims that he was denied medical care

following the incident. Id. at 5-6. 

The Court directed Plaintiff in the Court’s Order dated October 27, 2010 to

submit four service copies of the amended complaint (Doc. 6) for service upon the

Defendants. (Doc. 12). Plaintiff likely has been released as evidenced by the Notice

of Change of Address filed by Plaintiff on August 18, 2010, disclosing that Plaintiff’s

new address is a private residence. (Doc. 9.) Because Plaintiff had failed to file any

copies as instructed, the Court entered a show cause order requesting Plaintiff to file a

response by November 17, 2010. (Doc. 13.) Plaintiff has not filed any response nor

has he submitted any service copies as directed. The docket reflects that none of the

Court’s mail has been returned as undeliverable.

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash Railroad, 370 U.S. 626 (1962); Eades v. Alabama Dept. of
Page 2 of 2

Human Resources, 298 Fed. Appx. 862 (11th Cir. 2008) (district court has discretion to

dismiss case sua sponte where plaintiff has failed to comply with court orders and was

on notice that such failure may result in dismissal). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) also

authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a court order. 

Plaintiff has failed to comply with two orders of this Court directing that he submit

service copies of the amended complaint. (Docs. 12 and 13.) Plaintiff was advised that

failure to comply with the Court’s Order may result in a recommendation that his case

be dismissed. Despite these warnings Plaintiff has not responded. Because it appears

that Plaintiff has been released from custody and has not responded to the Court’s

Orders, Plaintiff may have abandoned this lawsuit. Consequently, this case should be

dismissed.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with orders of the

Court.

At Gainesville, Florida, this 30 day of December, 2010. th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), a party may file specific, written objections to

the proposed findings and recommendations within 14 days after being served with a

copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s

objections within 14 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific

objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and

recommendations.

Case No: 4:09-cv-00245-RH -GRJ
# National Consumer Protection Week, 2007

During National Consumer Protection Week, citizens are urged to learn more about the risks of fraud and identity theft and take precautions to protect themselves from these crimes. 

Americans can help prevent fraud and identity theft by becoming informed consumers. The Federal Trade Commission suggests that individuals safeguard personal information such as Social Security and account numbers, closely monitor their financial accounts, and report any problems or suspicious activity. When doing business through the Internet, it is especially important to protect personal data with appropriate software and commonsense security practices. Consumers and businesses can find resources on how to avoid identity theft and fraud by visiting the Federal Government's consumer protection website, www.consumer.gov. 

My Administration is committed to protecting consumers from fraud, deception, and unfair business practices. In May 2006, I signed an Executive Order creating the Nation's first Identity Theft Task Force, comprised of the heads of executive departments and agencies. This Task Force is implementing a comprehensive strategy to prevent identity theft, prosecute those who commit fraud, and help victims. Through these and other efforts, we are helping to ensure that consumers have the tools they need to secure their personal information, monitor their financial accounts, maintain their privacy, and make responsible decisions to guard against fraud. 

Consumer fraud takes advantage of the trust and integrity that characterizes our country's marketplace. By remaining vigilant and defending against fraud, Americans can protect their financial security and help our Nation's economy remain strong. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim February 4 through February 10, 2007, as National Consumer Protection Week. I call upon Government officials, industry leaders, and consumer advocates to provide citizens with information about how they can prevent fraud and identity theft, and I encourage all citizens to be responsible consumers and take an active role in protecting their personal information. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this second day of February, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-first. 

[FR Doc. 07-596

Billing code 3195-01-P
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DOROTHY LORRAINE HARRIS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00421-MP -WCS

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 19, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, which recommends that the § 2241 petition, Doc. 1, be summarily dismissed

without prejudice to the filing of a § 2254 petition following entry of judgment in state court and

exhaustion of state court remedies. Petitioner has not objected to the recommendation, and the

time for doing so has passed. Petitioner's copy of the report and recommendation was returned

as undeliverable from the Duval County Jail. Petitioner was released from custody and is now

under probation felony supervision. Petitioner's copy of the report and recommendation was also

returned as undeliverable from her home address. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 14, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein.

2. Petition for writ of habeas corpus, Doc.1, is DISMISSED without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00421-MP-WCS Document 23 Filed 05/31/11 Page 1 of 1