alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2011360EN.01002701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 360/27 |

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 360/06

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reference number of the State Aid | SA.29433 (X 784/09) | |
| Member State | Netherlands | |
| Member State reference number | XS45/2008 | |
| Name of the Region (NUTS) | FLEVOLAND Article 107(3)(a) | |
| Granting authority | | | | --- | | Provincie Flevoland | | Postbus 55 | | 8200 AB LELYSTAD | | NEDERLAND | | www.flevoland.nl | | |
| Title of the aid measure | Regeling Technologische Innovatie en Milieu Innovatie 2008-2013 (TMI-regeling 2008-2013) | |
| National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication) | Verordening (EG) nr. 1083/2006 (en Bijdragetoekenning nummer C(2007) 3949 van de Europese Commissie van 13.8.2007 (art. 4 lid 1b) en Regeling EFRO doelstelling 2 programmaperiode 2007-2013 van 12 november 2007 (art. 2) (http://eb.sdu.nl/sduwebdata/op/SC82961.pdf) en Besluit EFRO programmaperiode 2007-2013 van 3 oktober 2007 (art.5)(http://eb.sdu.nl/eb/show.do?key=STB11214&type=op). | |
| Type of measure | Scheme | |
| Amendment of an existing aid measure | Modification XS 45/2008 | |
| Duration | 1.5.2008-31.12.2013 | |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | MANUFACTURING | |
| Type of beneficiary | SME | |
| Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme | EUR 3,00 (in millions) | |
| For guarantees | — | |
| Aid Instrument (Article 5) | Direct grant | |
| Reference to the Commission Decision | — | |
| If co-financed by Community funds | — | |
| Objectives | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in national currency | SME-bonuses in % |
| Industrial research (Art. 31(2)(b)) | 20 % | 5 % |

Web link to the full text of the aid measure:

http://www.flevoland.nl/wat-doen-we/europa/programmas-2007-2013/tmi-regeling/

---
EXHIBIT 31.2


I, Thornton J. Donaldson, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of CanWest Petroleum
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) intentionally omitted per SEC rel. 33-8238;

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors;

(e) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(f) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

December 22, 2004


        /s/ Thornton J. Donaldson
        -----------------------------
        Thornton J. Donaldson
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 225 (Friday, November 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 65839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5818]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: United States Institute of Peace.
    Date/Time: Tuesday, December 4, 2007, 9 a.m.-11 a.m.
    Location: 1200 17th Street, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20036-
3011.
    Status: Closed Meeting--Pursuant to Subsection (c) of Section 
552(b) of Title 5, United States Code, as provided in subsection 
1706(h)(3) of the United States Institute of Peace Act, Public Law 98-
525.
    Agenda: December 4, 2007 Board Meeting; Consideration of Building 
Committee Recommendation.
    Contact: Susan F. Douglas, HQ Project Office, Telephone: (202) 429-
7172.

    Dated: November 15, 2007.
Patricia P. Thomson,
Executive Vice President, United States Institute of Peace.
[FR Doc. 07-5818 Filed 11-20-07; 10:31 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-AR-M
# C_2009171EN.01000101.xml

| 23.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 July 2009

2009/C 171/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4191 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4458 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86480 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8073 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5164 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9200 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,825 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7020 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2548 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2348 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1247 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7455 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5704 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9980 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1657 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0480 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 777,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0069 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6933 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3362 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 316,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0421 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,065 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,2661 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,271 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6989 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,8286 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,8550 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4191

JPY

Japanese yen

132,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4458

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86480

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8073

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5164

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9200

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,825

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7020

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2548

RON

Romanian leu

4,2348

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1247

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7455

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5704

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9980

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1657

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0480

KRW

South Korean won

1 777,34

ZAR

South African rand

11,0069

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6933

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3362

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 316,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0421

PHP

Philippine peso

68,065

RUB

Russian rouble

44,2661

THB

Thai baht

48,271

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6989

MXN

Mexican peso

18,8286

INR

Indian rupee

68,8550

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JAMILA PAUL,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00170-MP-AK

ALACHUA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 18, Joint Report under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, in

which the parties agree to all deadlines. The Joint Report is adopted, and the Clerk is directed to

set the appropriate deadlines therefrom.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of November, 2009

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# C_2009262EN.01000102.xml

| 4.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5639 — Alpha V/Investindustrial Funds/Permasteelisa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 262/02

On 20 October 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5639. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5639. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2009152EN.01000801.xml

| 4.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/8

---

Special Report No 4/2009 ‘The Commission’s management of non-state actors’ involvement in EC development cooperation’

2009/C 152/04

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 4/2009 ‘The Commission’s management of non-state actors’ involvement in EC development cooperation’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 221 (Friday, November 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 64658]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5667]



[[Page 64658]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting:
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Genotypic and Phenotypic 
Heterogeneity in Dyslexia.
    Date: December 4, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
5B01, Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Marita R. Hopmann, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, 6100 Building, Room 5B01, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6911, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5cdcad5c8c4cbcbc8e5c8c4ccc98bcbcccd8bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4dcdbc4d9d5dadad9f4d9d5ddd89adadddc9ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 7, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5667 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DWAYNE CLINE NIMMONS,

Petitioner,

vs. 4:10cv321-SPM/WCS

KENNETH S. TUCKER,1

Respondent.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk.

In an order filed July 13, 2011, Petitioner was given a final opportunity to file an

amended petition by August 26, 2010. Petitioner was warned of dismissal if he failed to

comply with that order. Doc. 23. To date, no response has been received from the

Petitioner. 

1

 On August 24, 2011, Kenneth S. Tucker succeeded Edwin G. Buss as the

Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, and is automatically substituted as

Respondent. Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(d). 

Case 4:10-cv-00321-SPM-WCS Document 24 Filed 09/07/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734

(1962). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for 

failure to obey a court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited

(11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Petitioner has failed to comply

with an order or to prosecute this case, this petition should now be dismissed

without prejudice. 

Petitioner shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Petitioner a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by

filing a motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on September 7, 2011.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv321-SPM/WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00321-SPM-WCS Document 24 Filed 09/07/11 Page 2 of 2
#### ALEXANDER BROWN v. J. C. BASS, WELTON McRAY CREECH T/A RIVERSIDE CAB COMPANY, INC.

(Filed 29 April, 1964.)

Negligence § 30—

A verdict finding that defendants were negligent, that plaintiff by his own negligence contributed to his injury, and awarding damages, will not be set aside for inconsistency, and the court correctly sets aside the award of damages and enters judgment that plaintiff recover nothing.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Walker, S. J.,*October 1963 Civil Session of JOHNSTON.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover compensation for injuries sustained when struck by an automobile allegedly negligently operated by defendant Bass as the agent of defendant Creech.

Defendants denied the alleged negligence. As an additional defense, they pleaded plaintiff’s negligence as a contributing cause of the collision and resulting injuries.

Issues were submitted to and answered by the jury as follows:

“1. Was the plaintiff injured as a result of the negligence of the defendants?

ANSWER: Yes.

“2. If so, did the plaintiff by his own negligence contribute to his injury?

ANSWER: Yes.

“3. What amount of damages, if any, is plaintiff entitled to recover of the defendants?

ANSWER: $5,000.00.”

When the verdict was returned, plaintiff requested the court to poll the jury. Whereupon the court inquired of each juror as to his answer to the first and second issues. Each juror stated he answered each of these issues in the affirmative and adhered to the answer given. The court thereupon set aside the answer to the third issue and entered judgment that plaintiff recover nothing. Plaintiff excepted and appealed.

*Elam Beamuel Temple and J. Roscoe Barefoot for plaintiff appellant.*

*Shepard, Spence and Mast for defendants, appellees.*

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff’s assertion of error is based on the contention that the answers given by the jury to the second and third issues *740are so inconsistent that no judgment could be entered thereon and, because of the inconsistency, the verdict should have been set aside in *toto*and a new trial ordered.

The argument made for plaintiff has been made on several occasions in the past and rejected. *Sasser v. Lumber Company,*165 N.C. 242, 81 S.E. 320; *Holton v. Moore,*165 N.C. 549, 81 S.E. 779; *Oates v. Herrin,*197 N.C. 171, 148 S.E. 30; *McKoy v. Craven,*198 N.C. 780, 153 S.E. 412; *Allen v. Yarborough,*201 N.C. 568, 160 S.E. 833; *Crane v. Carswell,*203 N.C. 555, 166 S.E. 746; *Bullard v. Ross,*205 N.C. 495, 171 S.E. 789; *Butler v. Gantt,*220 N.C. 711, 18 S.E. 2d 119; *Swann v. Bigelow,*243 N.C. 285, 90 S.E. 2d 396. The latest application of the rule will be found in *Clodfelter v. Carroll, ante*630.

No error.
EXHIBIT 99     Certification Pursuant to Title 18, United  States
          Code,  Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section  906
          Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of USA Telcom Internationale
("USA  Telcom")  on  Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on  the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"), I, Allen  Jones,  President,  Chief
Executive Officer, and Principal Financial Officer of USA  Telcom,
certify,  pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section  1350,
as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

1.    The  Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section
  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in
  all  material respects, the financial condition and  results  of
  operations of USA Telcom

Date: April 15, 2003

/s/ Allen Jones
---------------------
Allen Jones
President and Chief Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Case 1:06-cv-14984-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CURTIS JEMISON

#P03564,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv265/MCR/MD

CMDR. HEMPHILL, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on July 28, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after reviewing

objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is adopted as the

opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) as malicious.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of September, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CAMI ADAMS,

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.:1:10-CV-67-SPM/GRJ

CAVALRY PORTFOLIO SERVICES LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to the Parties' Joint Stipulation of Dismissal (doc. 33) and

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), this matter is dismissed with

prejudice. However, pursuant to Northern District of Florida Local Rule 16.2,

this Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of sixty (60) days, during which time

any party may move to reopen this matter for good cause shown. 

DONE and ORDERED this seventh day of December, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
# C_2009024EN.01000102.xml

| 30.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5415 — Telenet/Concentra/VAR/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 24/02)

On 21 January 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5415. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5415. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---