alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                            eCHAPMAN.COM, INC.
                            POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the undersigned Directors and Executive
Officers of eCHAPMAN.COM, INC., a Maryland corporation, hereby constitute and
appoint NATHAN A. CHAPMAN, JR., and EARL U. BRAVO, SR. and either of them,
the true and lawful agents and attorney-in-fact of the undersigned with full
power and authority in either said agent and attorney-in-fact, to sign for
the undersigned and in their respective names as Directors and Executive
Officers of eChapman.com, Inc., the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, and any and
all further amendments to said Report, hereby ratifying and confirming all
acts taken by such agent and attorney-in-fact, as herein authorized.

                                                          DATE

/S/ NATHAN A. CHAPMAN, JR.                                March 29, 2001
---------------------------------------
Nathan A. Chapman, Jr., President and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)

/S/ DEMETRIS B. BROWN                                     March 29, 2001
---------------------------------------
Demetris B. Brown, Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Accounting and
Financial Officer)

/S/ EARL U. BRAVO, SR.                                    March 29, 2001
---------------------------------------
Earl U. Bravo, Sr., Director

/S/ DONALD V. WATKINS                                     March 29, 2001
---------------------------------------
Donald V. Watkins, Director

/S/ LOTTIE H. SHACKELFORD                                 March 29, 2001
---------------------------------------
Lottie H. Shackelford, Director

/S/ RAYMOND HAYSBERT                                      March 29, 2001
---------------------------------------
Raymond Haysbert, Director

/S/ MARK JEFFERSON                                        March 29, 2001
---------------------------------------
Mark Jefferson, Director

/S/ ADOLPH D. WASHINGTON                                  March 29, 2001
---------------------------------------
Adolph D. Washington, Director

/S/ THERON STOKES                                         March 29, 2001
---------------------------------------
Theron Stokes, Director
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-00068-RS-AK

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Plaintiff, an inmate presently incarcerated in the State of Washington, filed an

“admiralty” complaint which alleges that he has been kidnapped and held by pirates (Doc. 1). He

also seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2).

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), which was enacted on April 26, 1996,

provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915:

if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any

facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was

dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of

serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Plaintiff has had more than three prior prisoner actions dismissed on the grounds that they

were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim. Plaintiff has also been advised that this

Court considers him a “three striker,” and that he must allege imminent danger or pay the full

filing fee. See Doc. 3 in Case No. 4:08cv233-SPM/WCS; Doc. 3 in Case No. 4:00cv370. Most

recently, Plaintiff was denied leave to proceed, and his cause dismissed on April 15, 2010, in
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 1:10cv50-MP/AK. The present complaint appears to be the same complaint as the

pleading filed in Case No. 1:10cv50. 

The instant complaint is not filed on the proper forms and is frivolous on its face. There

are no allegations that would bring Plaintiff within the "imminent danger" exception. 

Because Plaintiff has had at least three prior dismissals and is not under imminent danger

of serious physical injury, Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis must be denied, and

this case must be dismissed. The dismissal will be without prejudice to Plaintiff’s making the

same allegations in a complaint and paying the full $350.00 filing fee at the time of filing the

new case.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED.

2. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.

ORDERED on April 27, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 1:10-cv-00068-RS-AK
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Oilsands Quest Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended April 30, 2011, the undersigned Garth Wong, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:
  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   July 5, 2011/s/ Garth WongGarth Wong, President and Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILLIE MAE STUART,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-96-SPM-GRJ

CARBONELLY, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on the return of an unexecuted summons from

the United States Marshal. (Doc. 35.) One of the Defendants in the Second Amended

Complaint is identified only as “Officer Hattan.” (Doc. 20.) The United States Marshal

has informed the Court that he could not serve Officer Hattan because there are two

correctional officers currently employed by the Florida Department of Corrections with

the last name of Hattan. The United States Marshal has also informed the Court that

he needs the Defendant’s first name in order to serve the correct Officer Hattan.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide the Court with the

first name of Defendant Officer Hattan by June 3, 2011 so that the Court may issue a

summons for the correct Officer Hattan.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19 day of May, 2011. th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00096-SPM-GRJ Document 36 Filed 05/19/11 Page 1 of 1
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2978

_____________________________
A DAM M EREDITH , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. John T. Brown , Judge

. April 15, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
W ETHERELL , O STERHAUS , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Adam Meredith, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  FREIGHT  MANAGEMENT  CORP.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended  March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Gerald
Lewis,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                    /s/ Gerald Lewis
                                    --------------------------------------------
Date: April 30, 2009                Gerald Lewis
                                    Secretary Treasurer, and Principal Financial
                                    and Accounting Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

STATE OF FLORIDA, ex rel FREDA

COBB and LYNN PADGETT,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv118/RS-MD

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF

PRISONS, and UNICOR,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested by Defendants’ Motion For Extension Of Time (Doc. 6) is

granted.

ORDERED on June 7, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ANITA J. CRAWFORD, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv222/RS-WCS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner

of Social Security Administration, et al,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13). No

objections have been filed. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. The decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff’s application for Social

Security benefits is reversed.

3. This case is remanded to the Administrative Law Judge for further

consideration as stated in the Report and Recommendation.

ORDERED on July 12, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00222-RS-WCS Document 14 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2010013EN.01005701.xml

| 20.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/57

---

Simplified notice of competitive public tenders for the operation of the Clermont-Ferrand–Lille, Clermont-Ferrand–Marseille, Clermont-Ferrand–Strasbourg and Clermont-Ferrand–Toulouse public service air routes

2010/C 13/12

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Clermont-Ferrand–Lille
  Clermont-Ferrand–Marseille
  Clermont-Ferrand–Strasbourg
  Clermont-Ferrand–Toulouse |
| Period of validity of the contract | From 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2013 |
| Deadline for submission of applications and tenders | — | for applications (first step): 8 March 2010 (16.00, local time) |

Member State

France

Routes concerned

Clermont-Ferrand–Lille

Clermont-Ferrand–Marseille

Clermont-Ferrand–Strasbourg

Clermont-Ferrand–Toulouse

Period of validity of the contract

From 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2013

Deadline for submission of applications and tenders

—

for applications (first step): 8 March 2010 (16.00, local time)

| — | for tenders (second step): 12 April 2010 (16.00, local time) |
| --- | --- |

—

for tenders (second step): 12 April 2010 (16.00, local time)

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

| Syndicat mixte de l’aéroport de Clermont-Ferrand Auvergne |
| --- |
| BP 60 |
| 13-15 avenue de Fontmaure |
| 63402 Chamalières Cedex |
| FRANCE |
| Ms Véronique BARLET |
| Tel. +33 0473318171 |
| Fax +33 0473318480 |
| E-mail: v.barlet@cr-auvergne.fr |

Syndicat mixte de l’aéroport de Clermont-Ferrand Auvergne

BP 60

13-15 avenue de Fontmaure

63402 Chamalières Cedex

FRANCE

Ms Véronique BARLET

Tel. +33 0473318171

Fax +33 0473318480

E-mail: v.barlet@cr-auvergne.fr

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER STEPHEN POWERS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No.: 5:10cv243/MCR/MD

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated February 15, 2011 (doc. 25). Petitioner has been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1).

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and no objections thereto

being timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) challenging

the conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Powers in the Circuit Court of Holmes

County, Florida, case no. 07-195CF, is DENIED and the clerk is directed to close the file.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of March, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00243-MCR-MD Document 27 Filed 03/22/12 Page 1 of 1
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the “Trust”) does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that: 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2022 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
/s/ Ron E.Hooper                                    Ron E. Hooper
Senior Vice President on behalf of Simmons Bank,

not in its individual capacity but solely as

the Trustee ofMarine Petroleum Trust

Dated: May 16, 2022 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filedas part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Trust, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 
**
Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 1 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 2 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 3 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 4 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 5 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 6 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 7 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 8 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 9 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 10 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 11 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 12 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 13 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 14 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 15 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 16 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 17 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 18 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 19 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 20 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 21 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 22 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 23 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 24 of 25Case 3:10-cv-00065-MCR-EMT Document 86 Filed 04/25/11 Page 25 of 25
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Tuesday, December 4, 2007.

# Place:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

Open.

# Matters to be Considered:

                        The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session:                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                         *Empire Iron Mining Partnership,*                         Docket No. LAKE 2006-60-RM. (Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge correctly ruled that the Secretary of Labor may properly allege violations of alternative standards in a citation and whether the Judge correctly determined that the operator violated 30 CFR 56.14105.)                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# Contact Person For More Info:

Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 07-5880 Filed 11-26-07; 4:04 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 1:10-cr-24-SPM

EUGENIA YVONNE HUGHES-HOLT,

 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER 

The Court has been in formed that the restitution hearing, presently set for July

27, 2011, is no longer necessary, as the Parties have reached an agreement resolving

restitution issues. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the

restitution hearing is cancelled and sentencing in this matter is rescheduled for July 27,

2011, at 10:00 a.m.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-first day of July, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:10-cr-00024-MW-GRJ Document 41 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 1
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 1 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 2 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 3 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 4 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 5 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 6 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 7 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 8 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 9 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 10 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 11 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 12 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 13 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 14 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 15 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 16 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 17 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 18 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 19 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 20 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 21 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 22 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 23 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 24 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 25 of 26
Case 4:09-cv-00311-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 08/13/2009 Page 26 of 26
#### SOUTHLAND ASSOCIATES, INC. v. PEACH

No. 245 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 340.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
| 1)   | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2)   | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of and for the periods covered in theReport. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                            |   |   |   |                           |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
| By:    | /s/      D. Michael Kramer                      |   |   | By:    | /s/      Vanessa M. Richards   |   |
|   | D.      Michael Kramer                |   |   |        | Vanessa      M. Richards       |   |
|   | President      and Chief Executive      Officer |   |   |   | Senior      Vice President and |   |
|   |                                            |   |   |   | Chief      Financial Officer   |   |

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 5, 2020

b0129

Order 

Clerk

February 5, 2020

159678

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159678

COA: 342325

Washtenaw CC: 14-000322-FH

ROGAN EDWARD LAMPE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.