alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      13,441,229
<SECURITIES>                                   199,859
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,200,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                   659,000
<INVENTORY>                                    262,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,693,114
<PP&E>                                      14,558,165
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,190,844
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,516,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,463,753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,183
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,663,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,516,121
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,654,057
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,468,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,031,676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,235,694
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,727,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,508,694
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,508,694
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       6,972,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,445,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 20,571,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,058,000
<PP&E>                                      53,131,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              25,505,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,684,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       21,763,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,800,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,446,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,684,000
<SALES>                                     99,877,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            99,877,000
<CGS>                                       91,742,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               13,172,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             228,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,783,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,913,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,784,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,784,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.72)


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PAUL C. VINCENT,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:10cv217/MCR/MD

SANTA ROSA COUNTY SCHOOL

DISTRICT,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

Thiscause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated November 1, 2010. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 14) is GRANTED as follows:

(1) The claims against defendant Joyce McCorvey are dismissed with

prejudice and Ms. McCorvey is dismissed as a defendant in this action.
Page 2 of 2

(2) The plaintiff’s ADA claim against the District is dismissed without

prejudice and this case is referred back to the undersigned for further proceedings

with respect to plaintiff’s claims against the District. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of December, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv217/MCR/MD
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

      ( print page 62866)    
                    Notice is hereby given that, on October 3, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), LiMo Foundation (“LiMo”) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Innopath Software, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA; Wind River Systems, Alameda, CA; ARM Holdings, PLC, Cambridge, UNITED KINGDOM; MontaVista Software, Inc., Santa Clara, CA; Broadcom Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA; Acrodea, Inc., Tokyo, JAPAN; Ericsson AB, Stockholm, SWEDEN; SoftBank Corp., Tokyo, JAPAN; NX B.V., Eindhoven, THE NETHERLANDS; and KT Freetel Co., Ltd., Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of this group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and LiMo intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 1, 2007, LiMo filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 9, 2007 (72 FR 17583).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 15, 2007. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on September 11, 2007 (72 FR 51841).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-5568 Filed 11-06-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global MobileTech, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Aik Fun Chong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  May 20, 2011

By:  /s/ Aik Fun Chong

 

       Aik Fun Chong

 

       President and Chief   

       Executive Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

VICKI WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:09cv341/RS-WCS 

THE CAPITAL,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 4).

Plaintiff has not filed objections.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on October 21, 2009.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2009259EN.01000102.xml

| 29.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 259/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5608 — Advent/Median Clinics)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 259/02

On 16 October 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5608. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5608. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2009298EN.01000301.xml

| 8.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 December 2009

2009/C 298/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4787 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4416 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90505 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4306 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5123 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4675 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,718 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,36 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7075 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0800 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2258 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2133 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6271 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5664 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4605 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0828 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0588 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 705,74 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0699 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0982 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2692 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 966,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0239 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,174 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,1400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,026 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5650 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7795 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,7743 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4787

JPY

Japanese yen

133,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4416

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90505

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4306

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5123

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4675

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,718

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,36

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7075

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0800

RON

Romanian leu

4,2258

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2133

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6271

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5664

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4605

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0828

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0588

KRW

South Korean won

1 705,74

ZAR

South African rand

11,0699

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0982

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2692

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 966,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0239

PHP

Philippine peso

68,174

RUB

Russian rouble

44,1400

THB

Thai baht

49,026

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5650

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7795

INR

Indian rupee

68,7743

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# CE2014072EN.01010002.xml

| 11.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 72/100 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 72/100

---

Thursday 25 October 2012Protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs ***

P7_TA(2012)0392

European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 October 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs (08741/2012 – C7-0173/2012 – 2012/0069(NLE))

2014/C 72 E/16

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (08741/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (08741/2012),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs (08742/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on the protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs (08742/2012),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0173/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph, Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0173/2012),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0272/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0272/2012),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Moldova. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Moldova.

---
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hollywood
Entertainment EDU Holding. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended Sept 30, 2009,
I, Hollis Liu, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.           Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended Sept 30, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
December 8, 2009





/s/ Hollis LiuHollis
      LiuPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)








/s/ Hollis LiuHollis
      Liu(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 4:10cv216-RH/CAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANITA A. JONES,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv216-RH/CAS

WARDEN, FCI Tallahassee,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING THE PETITION

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 8. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The petition is dismissed as 

moot.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 9, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00216-RH-CAS Document 11 Filed 04/09/12 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATIONS
 
 
 I, Peter
Mark Smyth, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of CityView Corporation
Limited;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and
have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 (d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's
auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the company's internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:
June 27, 2008
 
 
 
 _______________________
 
 Peter
Mark Smyth
 Chief
Executive Officer
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JAMES LONNIE BAKER, JR.,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv260/WS/EMT

WALTER McNEIL,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon Petitioner’s filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1). The court notes that Petitioner has neither applied for leave

to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the filing fee. Before this matter may proceed, Petitioner must

either pay the filing fee or obtain leave to proceed in forma pauperis by filing a fully and properly

completed application and attachments.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk is directed to send to Petitioner an application to proceed in forma pauperis.

2. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Petitioner shall

either pay the filing fee of $5.00 or submit a fully completed application to proceed in forma

pauperis. 

3. Petitioner’s failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation of

dismissal of this action for failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of July 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE