alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. WILLIAM P. HOWELL.

(Filed 15 April, 1964.)

1. Criminal Law § 100—

Where defendant does not renew his motion for nonsuit at the close of ail the evidence he waives his motion made at the close of the State’s evidence, and the matter is not subject to review in .the Supreme Court.

2. Indictment and Warrant § 10—

The fact that defendant’s name does not appear in the affidavit upon which the warrant in arrest was issued is not fatal when the warrant itself identifies defendant by name.

Appeal by defendant from *Bickett, J.,*October Criminal Session 1963 of WAKE.

The defendant was tried in the Municipal Court of the City of Raleigh upon a warrant charging that he did wilfully and unlawfully drive an automobile on the public highways of Raleigh Township and upon the public streets of the City of Raleigh while under the influence of liquor, this being a second offense, *et cetera.*

The defendant was adjudged guilty and from the judgment imposed he appealed to the Superior Court of Wake County where he was tried *de novo*on the same warrant.

The jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. The court imposed a prison sentence of eighteen months which was suspended upon condition that the defendant pay a fine of $300.00 and costs and that he not operate a motor vehicle on the highways of the State of North Carolina for a period of three years.

The defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Attorney General Bruton, Deputy Attorney General Harry W. Mc-Galliard for the State.*

*658
      *Earle H. Purser for defendant.*

PerR Curiam.

The defendant assigns as error the failure of the court below to sustain his motion for judgment as of nonsuit made at the close of the State’s evidence and not renewed at the close of all the evidence.

The defendant testified in his own behalf and introduced other evidence.

The failure of the defendant to renew his motion at the close of all the evidence constituted a waiver of his right to insist upon his first motion and it is not subject to review in this Court. G.S. 15-173; *S. v. Hayes,*187 N.C. 490, 122 S.E. 13; *S. v. Chapman,*221 N.C. 157, 19 S.E. 2d 250; *S. v. Epps,*223 N.C. 741, 28 S.E. 2d 219; *S. v. Leggett,*255 N.C. 358, 121 S.E. 2d 533. However, the State’s evidence adduced in the trial below was sufficient to carry the case to the jury. Furthermore, the defendant’s own testimony was sufficient to support the verdict.

The defendant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to sustain his motion in arrest of judgment on the ground that the name of the defendant did not appear in the affidavit upon which the warrant of arrest was issued and which is partly in these words: “These are therefore to command you forthwith to apprehend the said William P. Howell * * * to answer the above charge set forth in the affidavit, and be dealt with according to law." This assignment of error is overruled on authority of *S. v. Poythress,*174 N.C. 809, 93 S.E. 919, and *S. v. Hammonds,*241 N.C. 226, 85 S.E. 2d 133.

The rulings of the court below from which appeal was taken are

Affirmed.
# C_2010108EN.01000501.xml

| 28.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 April 2010

2010/C 108/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3290 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,70 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4422 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86705 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5770 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4353 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8440 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,514 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7080 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9166 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1280 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9779 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4395 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3340 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3178 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8454 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8205 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 475,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8276 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0715 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2508 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 970,34 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2362 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,038 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,7900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,854 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3278 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,2064 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,0670 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3290

JPY

Japanese yen

124,70

DKK

Danish krone

7,4422

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86705

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5770

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4353

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8440

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,514

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7080

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9166

RON

Romanian leu

4,1280

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9779

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4395

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3340

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3178

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8454

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8205

KRW

South Korean won

1 475,19

ZAR

South African rand

9,8276

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0715

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2508

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 970,34

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2362

PHP

Philippine peso

59,038

RUB

Russian rouble

38,7900

THB

Thai baht

42,854

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3278

MXN

Mexican peso

16,2064

INR

Indian rupee

59,0670

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT   Document 38    Filed 04/26/10   Page 1 of 3

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT   Document 38    Filed 04/26/10   Page 2 of 3

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT   Document 38    Filed 04/26/10   Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 188 (Friday, September 28, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 55089]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-55516]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 64


Communities Eligible for the Sale of Insurance

CFR Correction

    In Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, revised as of 
October 1, 2006, on page 339, in Sec.  64.4, paragraph (b), in the 
fourth sentence, remove the words ``within the newly-month period,'' 
and add the words ``within the newly-acquired area the requirements of 
Sec.  60.3(b) of this subchapter. During the six month period,'' in 
their place.
[FR Doc. 07-55516 Filed 9-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 189 (Monday, October 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 55786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4808]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group; Obstetrics and Maternal-Fetal 
Biology Subcommittee.
    Date: October 23, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Gaithersburg Hilton, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, MD 
20877.
    Contact Person: Gopal M. Bhatnagar, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development, National Institutes of Health, 6100 Bldg Rm 5B01, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 435-6889. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#25474d44514b4442426548444c490b4b4c4d0b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5878d84918b848282a588848c89cb8b8c8dcb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 20, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4808 Filed 9-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-9 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 27-9 Filed 07/31/2008 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ROBERT F. BARNARD, as Personal

Representative of the Estate of Raymond

Paulk,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv213/RS-CJK

GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Geico’s Motion To File Bill Of Costs Out Of Time (Doc. 104).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant is granted leave to file its Bill of Costs out of time as an exhibit

to its Motion on June 9, 2011.

2. The clerk of the court shall tax costs for Defendant in accordance with 28

U.S.C. §1920. The clerk shall disallow the claim of $6,393.49 for copies. 

Defendant has failed to show that the copies were necessarily obtained

for use in the case.

ORDERED on June 14, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00213-RS-CJK Document 109 Filed 06/14/11 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Real Goods Solar, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Erik Zech, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 10, 2010



/s/ Erik ZechErik ZechChief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,**

**Petitioner**

**v. NORMAN ORVILLE SCOTT,**  **Respondent :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 2279 Disciplinary Docket No. 3** 

**No. 99 DB 2015 Attorney Registration No. 48244**  **(Philadelphia)**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 17 th**  **day of August, 2016, upon consideration of the Report and**  **Recommendations of the Disciplinary Board, Norman Orvil le Scott is suspended from**  **the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of six mont hs, and he shall comply with all**  **the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board**  **pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).**
#### STATE v. BROWN

No. 151 PC.

Case below: 33 N.C. App. 84.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1977.
# C_2010254EN.01000102.xml

| 22.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5955 — Metinvest BV/IISW)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 254/02

On 15 September 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5955. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5955. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

SHARLEEN M. RELLICK

- SMITH,

Petitioner

v.

BETTY J. RELLICK AND KIMBERLY V. VASIL,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 119 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13 th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED

, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:

a. Whether the Superior Court erred in affirming the Trial Court’s decision to allow the Respondents to file an amended answer to include the [affirmative] defense that the action was barred by the statute of limitations due to the issue having already been d etermined to be waived by the Trial

Court.
Case 4:10-cv-00413-SPM -WCS Document 4 Filed 09/20/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:10-cv-00413-SPM -WCS Document 4 Filed 09/20/10 Page 2 of 2
Order entered January 12, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00885 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 00886 - CR RICHARD DOUGLAS BAIL EY, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12 - 34478 - H , F12 - 34479 - H 

### O RDER This appeal is REINSTATED

. The trial court has filed findings of fact in accordance with our order entered on January 2, 2015. The trial court has recommended that appellant be given an extension to file his brief until February 4, 2015. We ADOPT the trial court’s findings and recommendation. Appellant’s brief shall be due on February 4, 2015

. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 225 (Friday, November 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 65700]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5775]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1531]


Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 214 Lenoir County, NC

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order.

    Whereas, the North Carolina Global TransPark Authority, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 214, submitted an application to the Board for 
authority to expand the zone to include an additional site in Rocky 
Mount, North Carolina, adjacent to the Durham Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry (FTZ Docket 16-2007; filed 4/19/07);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (72 FR 21219, 4/30/07) and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 214 is approved, subject to the FTZ 
Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 2nd day of November 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate 
Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-5775 Filed 11-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      204
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         11
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,429
<PP&E>                                             210
<DEPRECIATION>                                      46
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,651
<BONDS>                                            390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                       (770)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,891
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,465
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (266)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       327
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (593)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,687
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (970)
<NET-INCOME>                                       124
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
# C_2010194EN.01000501.xml

| 17.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 July 2010

2010/C 194/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3000 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4512 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84535 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4810 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3543 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0530 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,428 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 280,85 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0914 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2658 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9907 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4812 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3586 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1061 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8146 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7893 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 563,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8064 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8075 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2276 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 757,68 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1672 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,177 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,4907 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,893 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2978 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6634 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,8140 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3000

JPY

Japanese yen

112,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4512

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84535

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4810

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3543

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0530

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,428

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

280,85

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0914

RON

Romanian leu

4,2658

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9907

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4812

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3586

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1061

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8146

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7893

KRW

South Korean won

1 563,65

ZAR

South African rand

9,8064

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8075

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2276

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 757,68

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1672

PHP

Philippine peso

60,177

RUB

Russian rouble

39,4907

THB

Thai baht

41,893

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2978

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6634

INR

Indian rupee

60,8140

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5257 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5257

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to prohibit the expenditure 
  of certain grant funds to purchase firearms, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2018

 Mrs. Demings (for herself and Mr. Thompson of Mississippi) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                                Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to prohibit the expenditure 
  of certain grant funds to purchase firearms, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Secure Communities and Safe Schools 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON EXPENDITURE OF CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 
              FUNDS TO PURCHASE FIREARMS.

    Subsection (b) of section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 
(6 U.S.C. 609) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
            ``(6) Firearms.--A grant awarded under section 2003 or 2004 
        may not be used to purchase firearms and firearms accessories, 
        such as ammunition, including for use by teachers.''.
                                 <all>
```