N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT B . B ENEDIC T WA TER S, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. JUAN C ARLOS C ASAS; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 12-56464 D.C . No. 2:09-c v-07696-C ASAJW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia C hristina A. Sny de r, Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d July 22, 2014 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, C ANB Y, a nd C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s . B . B e ne dic t W at e rs a

ppe a l pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his ac tion a lle ging viola tions of theFa ir C re dit R e p orting Ac t (“ FC R A” ), the Fa i r De bt C o l le c tion Pra c tic e s Ac t (“ FDC PA” ), and othe r c la im s. W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo, Guatay 

# F IL ED JUL 31 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).C

hristian Fe llow

ship v . C ounty of San Die

go , 670 F.3d 957, 970 (9th C ir. 2011), and we a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt on W ate rs’ s FC R A and C a lifornia

C onsum e r C re d it R e porting Age nc ie s Ac t c la im s be c a u se W ate rs fa ile d to ra ise a

ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r the re we re ina c c ura c ie s in his c re dit re p ort or tha t the c olle c tion a c c ounts we re im prope rly re porte d. Se eC

a rv alho v . Equifax

Info. Se r v s., LLC , 629 F.3d 876, 890-91 (9th C ir. 2010) (re quiring prima fa c ie showing of inac c urate re porting); se ealso C a l. C iv. C ode § 1785.25(a) (prohibiting re p orting of inform ation tha t is known to be inc o m ple te or ina c c urat e ). The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt on W ate rs’ s c onspira c y

c la im be c a use W ate rs fa ile d

to ra i se a tria ble disputea s to whe the r the re wa s a n a gre e m e nt or m e e ting of them inds a m o ng suppose d c onspira

tors. Se e W ard v . EEOC, 719 F.2d 311, 314 (9th C ir. 1983). The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt on W ate rs’ s FDC PA c la im s be c a

use W ate rs fa ile d to ra i sing a ge nuine disputeof m ate ria l fa c t a s to whe the r the c olle c tion a c c ount wa s a “ de bt” unde r the FDC PA. Se e Turne r v . C ook , 362 F.3d 1219, 1226-28 (9th C ir. 2004) (FDC PA “ de bt” is inc urre d only whe n a c onsum e r e n ga ge s in a c onse nsua l tra nsa c tion). 1 2 - 5 6 4 6 4 2The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion by

de c lining to e xe rc i se supple m e nta l jurisdic tion ove r W ate rs’ s re m a ining sta te la w c la i m s, e xpa

nding the ve xatious litiga

nt orde r, de ny ing W ate rs’ s m otions for sa nc tions, a nd gra nting re lie f from

an e ntry of de fa ult a fte r finding good c a

use . Se e W

inte rrow d v . Am. Ge n. Annuity

Ins. C o. , 556 F.3d 815, 819 (9th C ir. 2009) (sta n da rd of re vie w for de nia l of sa

nc tions); Tritc hle r v . C

ounty of Lak e , 358 F.3d 1150, 1153 (9th C ir. 2004) (sta nda rd of re v i e w for de c lining to e xe rc ise supple m e nta l jurisdic tion); Brady v . Unite d State s , 211 F.3d 499, 504 (9th C ir. 2000) (a distric t c ourt’ s disc re tion is e spe c ia lly broa d whe n se tting a s ide e ntry of de fa ult); DeLong v . He nne sse y , 912 F.2d 1144, 1146 (9th C ir. 1990) (sta nda rd of re vie w a

nd re quire m e nts for ve xat ious litiga nt orde rs). W e re je c t a s unsupporte d

by the re c o rd W ate rs’ s c o nte ntions c onc e rning the distric t c o urt’ s sua

sponte grant of sum

m ary judgm e nt, de nia l of judgm e nt on the ple a dings, a

nd a ward of c osts. W e do not c onside r m atte rs not spe c ific a lly an d distinc tly

ra i se d a nd a rgue d in the ope ning brie f, or a

rgum e nts a

n d a lle g ations ra ise d for the first tim e on a ppe a l. Se ePadge tt v . W

right , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009) (pe r c uriam ). All pe nding m otions a

nd re que sts a

re de n ie d. AFFIRM E D. 1 2 - 5 6 4 6 4 3