alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eagle Broadband, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard R. Royall,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  December 8, 2003


/S/Richard R. Royall
--------------------
Richard R. Royall,
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62663-62664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5532]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the National Advisory Board on Medical Rehabilitation Research.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Board on Medical 
Rehabilitation Research.
    Date: December 3-4, 2007.
    Time: December 3, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: NICHD Director's Report presentation, NCMRR Director's 
Report presentation and various reports on Medical Research 
Initiatives.
    Place: Hilton Washington DC/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Time: December 4, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: Other business dealing with the NABMRR Board.
    Place: Hilton Washington DC/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, 
Rockville, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Ralph M. Nitkin, PhD, Director, BSCD, National 
Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institute of

[[Page 62664]]

Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Building, Room 2A03, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 402-4206.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/about/ncmrr.htm, where an agenda and 
any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 30, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5532 Filed 11-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

Wednesday, November 7, 2007, 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

# PLACE:

Clarence M. Mitchell, Jr. Conference Room on the Ninth Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 1801 “L” Street, NW., Washington, DC 20507.

# STATUS:

The meeting will be open to the public.

## Matters to be Considered

### Open Session

1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and

2. Obligation of Funds for a Three-Month Extension of the National Contact Center Contract.

# Note:

                        In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register**                        , the Commission also provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission sessions.)                    

Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the voice and TTY numbers listed above.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

This Notice Issued October 29, 2007.

Stephen Llewellyn,

Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 07-5438  Filed 10-29-07; 1:34 pm]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-M
gtph_ex1037





  Exhibit 10.37











 



ADDENDUM TO EXCHANGE AGREEMENT


 


An
Agreement was made by and between GUIDED THERAPEUTICS, INC. (the
"Company") and the undersigned creditor of the Company (the
"Creditor") on the 241h day
of July, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as "original stated
contract") set forth below.


 


WHEREAS, the
parties wish to modify the terms of the original stated contract as
set forth herein.


 


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein, the
parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree that the
following constitutes additional terms and conditions of the stated
contract.


 


Modification Item
I: The Creditor agrees to accept cash payment in the amount of
$207, I 10.86 in the form of an unsecured note, with the
Company, bearing 6% annual interest and commencing on the day of
the original Agreement. The note shall be due in full on the third
anniversary of that agreement.


 


The
parties reaffirm no other terms or conditions of the above
mentioned original contract not hereby otherwise modified or
amended shall be negated or changed as a result of this here stated
addendum.


Dated:
July 26, 2019


Company:



GUIDED THERAPEUTICS, INC.


 


 



           
           
           
           
           
           
            
Creditor:


 

   
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
              /s/
Mark Faupel

Mark
L. Faupel,
COO
Exhibit 10.1


 





THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS


 


OF


 


CANNABICS PHARMACEUTICALS INC.


 


 


The following is a
true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of this Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting
having been waived, held on this 16th day of April, 2020;


 


The Board of Directors which was present
for this meeting & took active part therein was:


 


Eyal Barad


Gabriel Yariv


 


Dr. Gil Feiler (as permanent observer on
the Board)


 


WHEREAS,


 


In order to more actively
assist the company in advancing its goals, Director and Board Member Itamar Borochov has agreed to assume additional responsibilities
in the company;


 


NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the majority of Directors having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a preference
in the issue and pursuant to NRS §78.315, have unanimously decided and RESOLVED that:


 


Itamar Borochov has
been Nominated and has Accepted the position as Chairman of the Board of Directors;


 


Said Motion is hereby passed and the corporate
books, records and the Secretary shall file this Resolution in the corporate records


 


 


DATED: 16th April, 2020





_____________________________


David E. Price, Secretary, Corp Counsel
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Lawrence Chimerine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that the Annual Report of First Transaction
Management, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of First Transaction Management, Inc.




/s/
      Lawrence ChimerineLawrence
      ChimerinePrincipal
      Accounting OfficerFirst
      Transaction Management,
Inc.




March 31,
2010
Exhibit No.32

|   | (1) | the      Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as      amended; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |         |                                             |
|-----------------------------|--------------|--------------------------------------------------|
|                        |         |
|                        |         |                                             |
| Date:      October 29, 2009 | By:     | /s/Mark      DeFoor                              |
|                        | Name:   |  Mark      DeFoor                           |
|                        | Title:  |  President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|                        |    |
|                        |         |

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUIS ALBERTO PEREZ

- SORIA,

Petitioner,

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 14

- 70733 Agency No. A205

- 320

- 747

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted June 26, 2017 **
Before: PAEZ, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Luis Alberto Perez

- Soria, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigrations Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal , and relief under the Co nvention Against Torture (“CAT”)

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 7 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 70733

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due process violat ions in immigration proceedings. Simeonov v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004)

. We dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for
review.
Perez

- Soria contends he was denied due process as a result of being unable to fully present his case due to his former counsel’s incompetence and IJ bias

. W e lack jurisdiction to consider Perez

- Soria’s contentions regarding his former
counsel. See Liu v. Waters , 55 F.3d 421, 424 (9th Cir. 1995) (petitioner must first exhaust ineffective assistance of counsel claim by raising it to the BIA). We reject
Perez

- Soria’s contention that the BIA erred by failing to address the IJ’s pre clusion
of his second witness because Perez

- Soria did not raise this issue to the BIA. Further, w e reject Perez

- Soria’s contention that the IJ violated his due process rights

. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and prej udice to prevail on a due process claim) ; Halaim v. INS , 358 F.3d 1128 , 1137 (9th Cir. 2004) (IJ’s conduct did n ot deny petitioners due process). Perez

- Soria does not otherwise challenge the agency’s denial of his application for asylum, withholding of removal , and CAT relief

. PETITION FOR REVIEW D ISMISSED in part; DENIED in part
.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         In connection with the Annual Report of Simulations Plus, Inc., a
California corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended August
31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
Walter S. Woltosz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Momoko A. Beran,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant of ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that
to his/her knowledGe:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ WALTER S. WOLTOSZ
-----------------------
Walter S. Woltosz
Chief Executive Officer
November 22, 2006



/S/ MOMOKO A. BERAN
-----------------------
Momoko A. Beran
Chief Financial Officer
November 22, 2006


(A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simulations Plus, Inc. and will be retained by Simulations Plus,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's financial  statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                       <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       9,725,952
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,925,307
<PP&E>                                         809,890
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,905,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          883,629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       202,766
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,512,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,905,912
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,401,616
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,393,748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               999,122
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              71,916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,064,926)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,064,926)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,064,926)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.26)




</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SYLVESTER JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv198/MCR/MD

P. SEXTON, et. al,

 Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff initiated

this action on July 21, 2010 by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

(doc. 1), and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2). Because both the

complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis were deficient, this court

entered an order on August 5, 2010 directing plaintiff to file an amended complaint

and to either pay the $350.00 filing fee or correct the deficiency in his in forma

pauperis application, within thirty days. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff was warned that failure

to comply with the order would result in a recommendation of dismissal of this

action. 

Plaintiff did not respond to the order. Accordingly, on September 24, 2010,

this court issued an order directing plaintiff to show cause, within fourteen days,

why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the

court. (Doc. 7). That deadline has passed, and plaintiff has neither responded to the

order, nor complied with the court’s August 5, 2010 order.
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 5:10cv198/MCR/MD

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this cause be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure

to comply with an order of the court.

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 28th day of October, 2010.

/s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within ten days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FELIX FORCADES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 244 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

FELIX FORCADES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 245 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7210

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

TONY WELLS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, 

District Judge. (3:09-cv-00104-RLV; 5:05-cr-00032-3; 3:06-cr00045-RLV)

Submitted: March 14, 2012 Decided: March 27, 2012

Before NIEMEYER, WILKINSON, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Wells, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. O’Malley, OFFICE OF THE 

UNITED STATE ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina; Amy Elizabeth 

Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Wells seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion. 

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the 

notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

In a civil action in which the United States or its 

officer or agency is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed 

no more than sixty days after the entry of the district court’s 

final judgment or order, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), unless the 

district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 

4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil 

case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 

U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on March 30, 2011. The notice of appeal was filed on August 28, 

2011.*

 Because Wells failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We deny a certificate of appealabilty and 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

 * For purposes of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have properly been delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988). 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### TASTINGER v. TASTINGER

No. 465P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 240.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982.
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
                  United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vycor Medical, Inc.,
                  a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that: 1)The quarterly report on Form 10-q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011
                     (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements
                     of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2)The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
                     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                     of the Company.
 Date: November 11, 2011  /s/ Adrian LiddellAdrian LiddellPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
                     has been provided to VYCOR MEDICAL, INC. and will be retained by
                     VYCOR MEDICAL, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
                     Commission or its staff upon request.