alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010280EN.01003501.xml

| 16.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/35

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5927 — BASF/Cognis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 280/09

| 1. | On 8 October 2010, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which BASF SE (‘BASF’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Cognis GmbH (‘Cognis’, Germany), by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 8 October 2010, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which BASF SE (‘BASF’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of Cognis GmbH (‘Cognis’, Germany), by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for BASF: chemicals, plastics, performance products, agricultural and functional solutions, oil and gas, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for BASF: chemicals, plastics, performance products, agricultural and functional solutions, oil and gas,

| — | for Cognis: specialty chemicals and nutritional ingredients. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Cognis: specialty chemicals and nutritional ingredients.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5927 — BASF/Cognis, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5927 — BASF/Cognis, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LIFTON ROBINSON, JR.,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-193-RS-GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPT. OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 

39) and Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. 42). I have reviewed the objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because there was 

no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on September 24, 2013.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SUE VEAL CARLTON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv203/RS-GRJ

JAMES DEWEY VEAL and CHARLES

DAVID VEAL, as Successor Co-Trustees

of the Veal Family Trust UDA June 2, 1993,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Defendants’ Motion For Reconsideration (Doc. 19) is denied.

ORDERED on January 6, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2010214EN.01000102.xml

| 7.8.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 214/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 214/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5904 — SAP/Sybase)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 214/02

On 20 July 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5904. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5904. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2010082EN.01002501.xml

| 30.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/25

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 March 2010

2010/C 82/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3471 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,75 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4419 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89940 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7760 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4329 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0670 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,453 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7080 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8916 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0682 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0641 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4734 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3750 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4596 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8991 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8845 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 529,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,9803 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1958 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2627 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 240,18 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4003 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,029 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,8145 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,589 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4401 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7633 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 60,5100 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3471

JPY

Japanese yen

124,75

DKK

Danish krone

7,4419

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89940

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7760

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4329

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0670

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,453

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7080

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8916

RON

Romanian leu

4,0682

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0641

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4734

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3750

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4596

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8991

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8845

KRW

South Korean won

1 529,64

ZAR

South African rand

9,9803

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1958

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2627

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 240,18

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4003

PHP

Philippine peso

61,029

RUB

Russian rouble

39,8145

THB

Thai baht

43,589

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4401

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7633

INR

Indian rupee

60,5100

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2009219EN.01002201.xml

| 12.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/22

---

Corrigendum to the call for proposals for actions in the field of eco-innovation under the ‘Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme’ (CIP, Decision 1639/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 89 of 18 April 2009
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 89 of 18 April 2009

2009/C 219/07

On page 2:

Extension of deadline for submission of proposals to the above mentioned call for proposals

Extension of deadline for submission of proposals to the above mentioned call for proposals

Due to an unforeseen technical problem with the electronic proposal submission system EPSS, the deadline for submission of proposals to call CIP-EIP-Eco-Innovation-2009 is extended to Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 17.00 CET.

Tuesday, 15 September 2009 at 17.00 CET

Access to the call website: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eco-innovation/application_en.htm

---
Exhibit 4.12





eFleets Corporation


7660 Pebble Drive


Fort Worth, Texas 76118


 


 


August 15, 2014


 


Advanced Microcontrols, Inc.


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to
the following Promissory Notes (each a “Note” and collectively the “Notes”) issued by Good Energy Conservation,
Inc. (the “Company”) to Advanced Microcontrols, Inc. (“Holder”):


 


	Date of Promissory Note	Original Principal Amount of Promissory Note
	 	 
	May 20, 2013	$110,000
	September 3, 2013	$40,000


 





For good and valuable
consideration the receipt of which is hereby received, the Company and the Holder hereby agree that the maturity dates of the May
20, 2013 Note shall be extended from May 20, 2014 to September 20, 2014 and the maturity date of the September 3, 2013 Note shall
remain that date (September 3, 2014) and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the respective Notes all interest and principal
due on the Notes shall be deferred and payable on the new respective maturity dates of the Notes. It is agreed this agreement is
effective on July 20, 2014.




 


Except as set forth
herein, all other terms set forth in the Notes shall remain unchanged. This extension agreement shall be governed by the laws of
the State of Texas, excluding its conflict of laws rules. The exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the any legal action instituted
by any party to this extension shall be the Circuit Court of Tarrant County, Texas.


 





	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 	 
	 	GOOD EARTH ENERGY CONSERVATION, INC. 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By: 		 
	 	 	James R. Emmons	 
	 	 	President	 


 








	Agreed and Accepted	 
	 	 	 
	Advanced Microcontrols, Inc.	 
	 	 
	 	 	 
	By: 	 	 
	 	Name:	 
	 	Title:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 248 (Friday, December 28, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 73579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-55525]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 11


General Rulemaking Procedures

CFR Correction

    In Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 59, 
revised as of January 1, 2007, on page 27, reinstate Sec.  11.71 to 
read as follows:


Sec.  11.71  What information must I include in my petition for 
rulemaking?

    (a) You must include the following information in your petition for 
rulemaking:
    (1) Your name and mailing address and, if you wish, other contact 
information such as a fax number, telephone number, or e-mail address.
    (2) An explanation of your proposed action and its purpose.
    (3) The language you propose for a new or amended rule, or the 
language you would remove from a current rule.
    (4) An explanation of why your proposed action would be in the 
public interest.
    (5) Information and arguments that support your proposed action, 
including relevant technical and scientific data available to you.
    (6) Any specific facts or circumstances that support or demonstrate 
the need for the action you propose.
    (b) In the process of considering your petition, we may ask that 
you provide information or data available to you about the following:
    (1) The costs and benefits of your proposed action to society in 
general, and identifiable groups within society in particular.
    (2) The regulatory burden of your proposed action on small 
businesses, small organizations, small governmental jurisdictions, and 
Indian tribes.
    (3) The recordkeeping and reporting burdens of your proposed action 
and whom the burdens would affect.
    (4) The effect of your proposed action on the quality of the 
natural and social environments.

[FR Doc. 07-55525 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2213 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2213

  To require the Secretary of Transportation to repay the credit risk 
  premiums paid with respect to certain railroad infrastructure loans 
   after the obligations attached to such loans have been satisfied.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2019

Mr. Gardner (for himself and Mr. Bennet) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Transportation to repay the credit risk 
  premiums paid with respect to certain railroad infrastructure loans 
   after the obligations attached to such loans have been satisfied.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Railroad Rehabilitation and 
Improvement Financing Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. CREDIT RISK PREMIUMS.

    (a) Refund.--Section 502(f) of the Railroad Revitalization and 
Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (45 U.S.C. 822(f)) is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
            ``(5) Refund of premiums.--The Secretary shall repay the 
        credit risk premium of each loan, with interest accrued 
        thereon, not later than 60 days after the date on which all 
        obligations attached to each such loan have been satisfied. For 
        each loan for which obligations have already been satisfied, as 
        of the date of enactment of the Railroad Rehabilitation and 
        Improvement Financing Equity Act, the Secretary shall repay the 
        credit risk premium of each such loan, with interest accrued 
        thereon, not later than 60 days after the date of the enactment 
        of such Act.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as may be necessary to pay the cost of any 
direct loan modification (as defined in section 502 of the Federal 
Credit Reform Act of 1990) to carry out section 502(f)(5) of the 
Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, as added by 
subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Averox Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:  October 13, 2008                                 /s/ Salman Mahmood
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Salman Mahmood
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


Dated:  October 13, 2008                                 /s/ Yasser Ahmad
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Yasser Ahmad
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HANS CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00233-MP-WCS

DEGALA, FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL, STATE OF FLORIDA,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 18, Report and Recommendation from the

Magistrate Judge. On August 25, 2010, the Magistrate Judge ordered the Plaintiff to file an

amended complaint by September 27, 2010. Plaintiff has not complied with that order. A trial

court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute. Link v. Wabash

R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386 (1962). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to

dismiss an action for failure to obey a court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and

cases cited (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). 

The Magistrate Judge therefore recommended this case be dismissed. Plaintiff has filed

no objection, and the time for doing so has passed. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 18, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein. 

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of November, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# C_2010304EN.01000101.xml

| 10.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 304/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 304/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6005 — Cinven/Spice)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 304/01

On 29 October 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6005. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6005. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 99.1



                        Written Statement of Cary Brokaw
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the
undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer of Avenue Entertainment Group,
Inc. (the "Company"). Hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

----------------------------------------
Cary Brokaw
March 26, 2003
# C_2010125EN.01000801.xml

| 13.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/8

---

Notice concerning the provisional application of the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part (1)

1

2010/C 125/06

The European Union and Papua New Guinea have notified the completion of the procedures necessary for the provisional application of the Interim Partnership Agreement between the European Community, of one part, and the Pacific States, of the other part, in accordance with the Article 76 of that Agreement. Consequently the Agreement applies provisionally as from 20 December 2009 between the European Union and Papua New Guinea. On this date, pursuant to Article 4(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 (2), Protocol II of the Agreement concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ supersedes the provisions contained in Annex II to the Regulation. On the same date, pursuant to Article 5(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 the temporary suspension procedures set out in paragraphs 2 to 4 of Article 5 of the Regulation are superseded by those contained in Article 17 of the Agreement.

2

---

(1)  OJ L 272, 16.10.2009, p. 2.

1

(2)  OJ L 348, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---