alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009085EN.01002401.xml

| 9.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/24

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 April 2009

2009/C 85/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3231 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4509 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89935 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8975 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5170 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8960 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,593 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,88 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4785 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1831 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1143 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8644 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6340 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2546 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2963 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0064 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 783,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,1650 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0446 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4216 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 988,08 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8035 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,340 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,6317 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,884 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9241 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,8023 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,4060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3231

JPY

Japanese yen

132,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4509

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89935

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8975

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5170

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8960

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,593

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,88

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4785

RON

Romanian leu

4,1831

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1143

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8644

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6340

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2546

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2963

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0064

KRW

South Korean won

1 783,34

ZAR

South African rand

12,1650

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0446

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4216

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 988,08

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8035

PHP

Philippine peso

63,340

RUB

Russian rouble

44,6317

THB

Thai baht

46,884

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9241

MXN

Mexican peso

17,8023

INR

Indian rupee

66,4060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




As independent  auditors,  we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report,
dated August 12, 2004,  except for Note 27, as to which the date is September 8,
2004,  incorporated  by  reference  in this annual  report of Advance  Financial
Bancorp on Form  10-KSB for the year ended  June 30,  2004,  into the  Company's
previously filed Form S-8 Registration Statement File No. 333-74681.


                                                 /s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Steubenville, Ohio
September 21, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, Stroke Prevention/Intervention Program.                    

*Date:*                         November 30, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         The Ritz Carlton, Atlanta, 181 Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, GA 30303.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Shanta Rajaram, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NIH/NINDS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Suite 3208, Msc 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6033,                         *rajarams@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 1, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5614  Filed 11-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2010012EN.01000201.xml

| 19.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 12/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 12/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5698 — One Equity Partners/Constantia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 12/02

On 13 January 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5698. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5698. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

TERESA D HUGHES,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00154-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 19, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, be

affirmed. The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Upon

consideration, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation. 

First the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that the ALJ properly followed the

Eleventh Circuit's three-part test for evaluating subjective complaints of pain. The ALJ clearly

articulated the credibility finding and pointed to substantial supporting evidence in the record. 

Thus, the undersigned will not disturb this finding. 

Also, the Court agrees that the opinions of treating doctors on the ultimate issue of

disability are not supported by the medical evidence, and the evidence supports a contrary

finding. Thus, the ALJ was correct to accord the opinions of treating physicians less weight. 

The Court also agrees that the ALJ articulated adequate and specific reasons for doing so that are

supported by substantial evidence in the record. 

Finally, the Court agrees that the ALJ acted properly in considering the finding of

Case 1:10-cv-00154-MP-GRJ Document 20 Filed 10/21/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

disability by the Florida Retirement System but not according it the "great weight" urged by

plaintiff. As the ALJ noted, "no specifics or additional evidence has been offered in conjunction

with the State’s determination that would lead to a conclusion different from reached in this

decision.” Report and Recommendation, pp. 23-24.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is affirmed. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00154-MP-GRJ

Case 1:10-cv-00154-MP-GRJ Document 20 Filed 10/21/11 Page 2 of 2
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of G.L.H., a child, * From the 42nd District Court

of Coleman County,

Trial Court No. CV06755

.

No. 11

- 19

- 00 312

- C V * January 22 , 20 2 1

* Opinion by Trotter

, J.

(P anel consists of: Trotter , J.

, Williams , J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

( Bailey

, C. J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the order below. Therefore, in accordan ce with this court’s opinion, the

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by reason of

this appeal are taxed against Audrey Holmquest.
#### McAlister v. McAlister

No. 78 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 159.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 May 1972.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SCOTT J. BISHOP,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv234/RV/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated April 18, 2012 (doc. 26). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely

filed objections (doc. 28).

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of May, 2012.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00234-RV-EMT Document 29 Filed 05/04/12 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

vs. 3:09cr87/LAC

HENRY RICHARD HALE,

 Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11,

Fed.R.Crim.P., and has entered a plea of guilty to the eleven count indictment

against him. After cautioning and examining the defendant under oath concerning

the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was

knowledgeable and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by an

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. 

I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the defendant be

adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: September 24, 2009

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within 24 hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th
# C_2009079EN.01000302.xml

| 2.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5442 — E.ON Italia/MPE Energia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 79/03

On 24 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5442. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5442. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RICARDO HECHEVARRIA,

Petitioner,

vs. 3:09cv368/LAC/MD

BRUCE PEARSON, WARDEN,

Respondent.

_____________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on November 9, 2009, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), if any, the

Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. No objections have been

filed.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The petitioner’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 7) is DISMISSED with prejudice as petitioner has not

demonstrated entitlement to proceed under that section, and that treated as a § 2255

motion the petition is summarily dismissed as untimely.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14 day of December, 2009. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0423

_________________ STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RICHARD EDWARD ADSIT, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Counsel for Appellant Richard Edward Adsit, Jr., has filed a motion for extension of time to file the transcripts and to file the opening brief in this matter. Attached to the motion is an affidavit from court reporter Diedre Taber requesting an extension of time in the Tenth Judicial District Court to file the transcripts . It is not clear whether the affidavit was filed, whether it was filed in the District Court within the 40 - day time required by M. R. App. 9, or whether an order was granted. The motion for extension to file Appellant’s brief is not properly before this Court, as the record in this matter is not complete. IT IS ORDERED that Appellant until November 25, 2020, within which to file the transcripts.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 14 2020

10/14/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0423
# C_2009089EN.01000301.xml

| 18.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/3

---

Notice of invitation to tender for the buying in of skimmed milk powder by the paying agencies

2009/C 89/03

| 1. | A tendering procedure for buying-in of skimmed milk powder by the paying agencies has been opened by Commission Regulation (EC) No 310/2009 (1). Provisions applicable are laid down in Section 4 of Chapter II of Commission Regulation (EC) No 214/2001 (2). |
| --- | --- |

1.

A tendering procedure for buying-in of skimmed milk powder by the paying agencies has been opened by Commission Regulation (EC) No 310/2009 (1). Provisions applicable are laid down in Section 4 of Chapter II of Commission Regulation (EC) No 214/2001 (2).

1

2

| 2. | The time limit for the submission of tenders for the first individual invitation to tender shall be 21 April 2009. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The time limit for the submission of tenders for the first individual invitation to tender shall be 21 April 2009.

| 3. | Tenders shall be submitted to the paying agencies. The addresses of the paying agencies are available on the European Commission website CIRCA (http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/agri/lait/library?l=/&vm=detailed&sb=Title). |
| --- | --- |

3.

Tenders shall be submitted to the paying agencies. The addresses of the paying agencies are available on the European Commission website CIRCA (http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/agri/lait/library?l=/&vm=detailed&sb=Title).

---

(1)  OJ L 97, 16.4.2009, p. 13.

1

(2)  OJ L 192, 7.2.2001, p. 100.

2

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LAWRENCE L. BLANKENSHIP,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv250/MCR/EMT

KENNETH L. WILLIAMS,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated August 18, 2010. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. That Plaintiff’s Response, treated as a notice of voluntary dismissal (doc. 5), 

is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED, without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of September, 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 13.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of CityView Corporation Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, P M Smyth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



P M Smyth
 June 27, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ROBERT LEE HONG,

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 4:10cv155-SPM/WCS

WALTER MCNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 87) which recommends that

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 82) be granted. Plaintiff filed

objections (doc. 89). Upon consideration, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted despite Plaintiff’s objections. Accordingly,

it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 87) is

adopted and incorporated by reference into this order; and

2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 82) is granted.

3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and

Case 4:10-cv-00155-SPM-WCS Document 90 Filed 02/16/12 Page 1 of 2
close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of February, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

2

Case 4:10-cv-00155-SPM-WCS Document 90 Filed 02/16/12 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lawrence Chimerine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Annual Report of First Transaction Management, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of First Transaction Management, Inc.





/s/ Lawrence ChimerineLawrence ChimerinePrincipal Accounting OfficerFirst Transaction Management, Inc.





October 19, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 225 (Friday, November 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 65708]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5819]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, December 7, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance matters.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, (202) 418-
5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-5819 Filed 11-20-07; 11:30 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M