alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Ho norable James Maxwell Moody, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Arkansas. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-1792

___________ Bobby Davis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Cheyenne Industries, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: November 20, 1997 Filed: November 28, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Bobby Da vis brought this Title VII action, alleging that his former employer , Chey enneIndustries, Inc., discharged him because of his race, African-American
. Following a bench trial, the district court found that Davis had failed to demonstrate 1 that Cheyenne & s proffered reason for terminating him was pretextual or that hi s discharge was racially motivated. Davis appeals.-2-

As D avis has failed to provide a transcript or to request one at government expense , we cannot review the district court & s factual findings. See Van Treese v
. Blome , 7 F.3d 729, 729 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). We conclude that based on its factual findings, the district court correctly entered judgment in favor of Cheyenne. See St. Mary & s H onor Ctr. v. Hicks , 509 U.S. 502, 507-08 (1993); Harvey v. Anheuser

Busch, Inc. , 38 F.3d 968, 973 (8th Cir. 1994). The judgment is affirmed. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i at e f orpubl i c at i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR T IN S AN C HE Z - DE L GA DI L L O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , Jr ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 10- 73593 A ge nc yN o. A 092- 340- 968 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d A ugus t8, 2012 ** B e f o r e : A L A R C Ó N , B E R Z O N , an dI K U T A , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . M art i n S an ch ez-D el g ad i l l o , a n at i v e an dci t i zen o f M ex i co , p et i t i o n s p ro se f o rr e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r atio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd is m is s in g h is appealfr om an i m m i grat i on j ud ge’ s orderdenyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen 

# FI LED AU G 15 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 73593 2 depo rt at i on proceedi ng s c on du ct ed i n absent i a. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . R e v ie w in g f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n , I

tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 321 F . 3d 88 9, 89 4 (9th C i r. 20 03 ), w e grantthe pet i t i on for r evi ew and rem and for further p ro ceed i n g s. T h e a g e n c yab u s e dits d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g S an c h e z - D e lg a d illo ’s m o tio n to r e ope n on the gr ound thathe f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h l a c k of not i c e . T he r e c or d di d not cont ai n any proo f of att em pt ed se rvi ce or no t i ce of ce rt i fi ed m ai lfor S anchezD e lg a d illo ’s A p r il 2 7 , 1 9 9 5 , n o tic e o f h e ar in g . See 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 5 2 b ( a ) ( 2 ) ( B) ( 1 9 9 5 ) ( n o tic e o f

h e ar in g s h a ll b e g iv e n in p e r s o n o rs e n t b yc e rtif ie dm a il) ; M

at ter of G ri j alva , 21 I. & N . D ec . 27 , 37 (B IA 19 95 ) ( ce rt i fi ed m ai lre qu i re d for no t i ce s of he ar i ng s e ntbym a i li n de port a t i on pr oc e e di ngs ) . W e the r e f or e r e m and t o the B I A t o de t e rm i ne w he the rS anc he z - D e l ga di l l o ha d a c tua lnot i c e of hi s A pr i l27, 1 9 9 5 , h e ar in g . See IN

S v. V en tu ra , 53 7 U . S . 12 , 16 -18 (20 02 ) ( per c uri am ). In li g h t o f o u r d isp o siti o n , w e n ee dn o t rea ch S an ch ez -D elg ad il lo ’s rem ai n i n g co n t en t i o n s. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

COTTIE ANN WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00155-SPM-GRJ

STATE FRAM AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign

corporation,

Defendant.

____________________________ /

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion To Compel Discovery From

Defendant. (Doc. 23.) Plaintiff requests the Court to enter an order compelling

Defendant to provide answers to Plaintiff’s expert interrogatories and to produce

documents in response to Plaintiff’s request for production. Defendant has not filed a

response to the motion and the time for doing so has long since passed.

Plaintiff’s motion concerns two distinct discovery requests. First, Plaintiff

requests that Defendant provide more complete responses to Plaintiff’s expert

interrogatories nos. 2, 3 and 4, each of which request information concerning prior

testimony provided by Defendant’s expert, Wagdi Faris, and previous instances in

which Dr. Faris has provided compulsory medical examinations for Defendant. Although

Defendant has provided responses to the interrogatories Plaintiff contends that the

responses are incomplete and/or not completely responsive to the interrogatory. 

The second discovery request addressed in Plaintiff’s motion concerns Plaintiff’s

request for production of documents. Apparently, when Defendant responded to the
Page 2 of 2

request it objected to the production of eight color photographs of Plaintiff’s vehicle on

the basis of work product privilege. Plaintiff points out that Defendant has now listed the

same photographs as exhibits which may be offered into evidence and, therefore, to the

extent the photographs were protected by the work product privilege, the photographs

are no longer protected as work product. 

Defendant has failed to offer any response to Plaintiff’s arguments and therefore

the Court assumes that Defendant does not have any meaningful arguments for the

Court to consider. While there may be some issue as to whether the responses to the

expert interrogatories were complete, in the absence of any response the Court must

conclude that the motion to compel is due to be granted.

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion To Compel Discovery From Defendant (Doc. 23) is

GRANTED. 

(2) Within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, Defendant shall provide full

and complete responses to Plaintiff’s Expert Interrogatories nos. 2, 3 & 4

and shall produce the eight color photographs of Plaintiff’s vehicle.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7 day of February, 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:09cr87/LAC

HENRY RICHARD HALE,

 Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there has been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(2), the plea of

guilty of the defendant, HENRY RICHARD HALE, to the eleven count indictment

against him is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for

sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28 day of September, 2009.

th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2010095EN.01000701.xml

| 15.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/7

---

SPECIFIC CALL FOR PROPOSALS — EAC/19/10

Erasmus University Charter 2011

2010/C 95/05

1.   OBJECTIVES AND DESCRIPTION

OBJECTIVES AND DESCRIPTION

The Erasmus University Charter provides the general framework for the European cooperation activities a higher education institution (HEI) may carry out within the Erasmus programme as part of the Lifelong Learning Programme (LLP). The Erasmus University Charter must be awarded as a prerequisite for HEI to organise student mobility and teaching and other staff mobility, to carry out Erasmus intensive language courses and intensive programmes, and to apply for multilateral projects, networks, accompanying measures and to organise preparatory visits. The Erasmus University Charter is based on the LLP Decision (1) which covers the 2007 to 2013 period. The specific objectives of the LLP are listed in Article 1.3 of the Decision.

1

2.   ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS

ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS

The Erasmus University Charter applies to all Higher Education Institutions defined in Article 2.10 of the Decision.

Applicants must be established in one of the following countries:

| — | the 27 Member States of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

—

the 27 Member States of the European Union,

| — | the EFTA-EEA countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, |
| --- | --- |

—

the EFTA-EEA countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway,

| — | the candidate countries: Turkey, Croatia, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, |
| --- | --- |

—

the candidate countries: Turkey, Croatia, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,

| — | Switzerland (2). |
| --- | --- |

—

Switzerland (2).

2

3.   DEADLINE FOR THE SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS

DEADLINE FOR THE SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS

The deadline for submitting applications for the Erasmus University Charter is 30 June 2010.

4.   FULL DETAILS

FULL DETAILS

The information about the Erasmus programme and the Erasmus University Charter can be found at the following Internet address: http://ec.europa.eu/llp

Applications must be submitted according to the guidelines provided by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency and available at the address: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/llp/index_en.htm

---

(1)  Decision No 1720/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 establishing an action programme in the field of lifelong learning. See http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri= OJ:L:2006:327:0045:0068:EN:PDF

1

(2)  The participation of Switzerland is based on the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation establishing the terms and conditions for the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the ‘Youth in Action’ programme and in the action programme in the field of Lifelong Learning 2007-2013 (signed on 15 February 2010 — not yet published).

2

---
# C_2009223EN.01001401.xml

| 16.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/14

---

Training of national judges in EC competition law and judicial cooperation between national judges

2009/C 223/08

A new call for proposals on training of national judges in EC competition law and judicial cooperation between national judges has been published on:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/competition/proposals2/

Deadline for application: 13 November 2009

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CORNELIUS DEWAYNE TAYLOR,

Petitioner, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-194/RS-CJK

UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Respondent. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19). No 

objections have been filed. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated 

by reference in this Order. 

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 

(Doc. 7) is DENIED. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

ORDERED on April 30, 2012.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00194-RS-CJK Document 20 Filed 04/30/12 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TERESA YATES and her spouse, LEE

YATES,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 5:10-cv-00226-RS/GRJ

WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP,

Defendant.

____________________________/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, by and through its undersigned attorney, files

notice with the court that the above case in relation to Plaintiffs and Defendant

Wal-Mart Stores East, LP has settled, with each of the parties bearing their own

costs and attorneys' fees. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 16.2(d), defendant requests

the court retain jurisdiction for 60 days for further proceedings should it become

necessary.

Case 5:10-cv-00226-RS-GRJ Document 54 Filed 08/25/11 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been

furnished to H. Lawrence Perry, Esq./Christopher A. Young, Esq., Perry & Young,

P.A., 2612 West 15th Street, Panama City, FL 32401 by electronic filing this 25

th

day of August, 2011. 

/s/ J. Andrew Talbert 

J. Andrew Talbert

Florida Bar No.: 0106003

Demetrea Dobson

Florida Bar No.: 90104

BOZEMAN, JENKINS & MATTHEWS, P.A.

114 East Gregory Street (32502)

Post Office Box 13105

Pensacola, FL 32591-3105

(850) 434-6223 Telephone

(850) 434-5242 Facsimile

E-mail: ATalbert@bjm-law.com

 ddobson@bjm-law.com

Attorneys for defendant

Case 5:10-cv-00226-RS-GRJ Document 54 Filed 08/25/11 Page 2 of 2
Form 52-109FT1  Certification of Annual Filings during Transition Period









I, Peter Dasler, CEO of CanAlaska Ventures Ltd certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the annual filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim Filings) of CanAlaska Ventures Ltd for the period ending April 30, 2005;



2.

Based on my knowledge, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the annual filings; and



3.

Based on my knowledge, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented in the annual filings.





DATED:

August 19, 2005















Per:

Peter Dasler





Peter Dasler



Chief Executive Officer









1
# C_2009101EN.01S00301.xml

| 1.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 1 May 2009, in Official Journal of the European Union C 101 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — Third supplement to the 27th complete edition’ and the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — Fourth supplement to the 27th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
EXHIBIT 23

To the Board of Directors
Echelon International Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Forms S-8 (No. 333-18171), (No. 333-18175), (No. 333-18177) and (No. 333-18179),
of Echelon International Corporation of our reports dated February 22, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Echelon International Corporation
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998,
and all related schedules, which reports appear in the December 31, 1998 annual
report on Form 10-K of Echelon International Corporation.

                                        KPMG LLP

St. Petersburg, FL
February 22, 1999
Exhibit 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




The Board of Directors
Avenue Entertainment Group, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-37397
on Form SB-2 of Avenue  Entertainment  Group,  Inc. of our report dated April 3,
1998 relating to the consolidated  balance sheet of Avenue  Entertainment Group,
Inc.  as of  December  31,  1997  and  the  related  statements  of  operations,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1997 and the
five-month  period ended December 31, 1996,  which report appears in Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 1997 of Avenue Entertainment Group, Inc.


                                                KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


New York, New York
April 14, 1998
# C_2009095EN.01000201.xml

| 24.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 April 2009

2009/C 95/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3050 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,28 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4494 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89680 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9158 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5130 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6900 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,831 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,81 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4355 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2438 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1350 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8304 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6108 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1138 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3258 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9594 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 759,27 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,6328 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,9130 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4300 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 257,13 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7274 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,280 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,9370 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,321 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8727 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2423 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,1650 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3050

JPY

Japanese yen

128,28

DKK

Danish krone

7,4494

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89680

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9158

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5130

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6900

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,831

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,81

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4355

RON

Romanian leu

4,2438

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1350

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8304

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6108

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1138

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3258

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9594

KRW

South Korean won

1 759,27

ZAR

South African rand

11,6328

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,9130

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4300

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 257,13

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7274

PHP

Philippine peso

63,280

RUB

Russian rouble

43,9370

THB

Thai baht

46,321

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8727

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2423

INR

Indian rupee

65,1650

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF J.A.B.,

A JUVENILE §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00244

- CV

Appeal from

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 10,01201)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered the cause on the record and concludes that there was no error in

the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

It has been determined that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal; therefore, thi s

Court makes no other order with respect to the payment of costs on appeal. This decision shall

be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2013.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 133832 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 133832 COA: 266089 Wayne CC: 05-004785-01 ASHLEY JORDAN PARKER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 13, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2020

No. 04-20-00576-CV

In re Lucas Jeffrey BURWITZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice, dissenting

Luz Elena Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On November 30, 2020, relator filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. We conditionally 

grant the petition for a writ of mandamus in part. We order the Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez to, 

by 10:00 a.m. on December 11, 2020, vacate the oral order rendered November 17, 2020 that 

requires amicus attorney Patricia DeVeau to prepare a written report to be admissible at trial that 

summarizes her work, impressions, observations and recommendations, e-file the report, and 

circulate it to all of the attorneys and litigants. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(c). The writ will issue 

only in the event we are informed Judge Alvarez has failed to comply with this order. All other 

relief requested in the petition is denied. The court’s opinion will follow.

It is so ORDERED on December 10, 2020.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-EM5-02653, styled In the Interest of M.I.J.B., a Child, pending in 

the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Lou Alvarez, presiding.