alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel, R13 Conference Grant Review.                    

*Date:*                         December 19, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Lorrita Watson, PhD., National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892-5465, (301) 402-1366,                         *watsonl@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: November 16, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5810  Filed 11-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### STATE v. BERRY

No. 131 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 97.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 June 1981. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of public interest allowed 2 June 1981.
EXHIBIT 4.100
  CESSION AGREEMENT
    THE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITED
   DRDGOLD LIMITED
  BUSINESS VENTURES INVESTMENT NO. 750 (PTY) LTD
  BUSINESS VENTURES INVESTMENT NO. 751 (PTY) LTD


WHEREBY IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
 
  DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION
  Definitions
    “Agreement”
 
  “Business”
   “Business Day”
    “the Claims”
   
  “Closing”
    “the Closing Date”
  “Companies Act”
  “the Companies”
    “CGR”
  “the Debentures”
   “ERPM”
  “The Guarantees”
    “The Inter-creditor Agreements”


“The Funding Agreements”
               “the Indemnities”
   “The Loan(s)”
   “Parties”
  “the Pledge”
    “the Purchaser”
   “Sale Assets”
      “Seller”
   “the KBH Loan”


“R” or “Rand””
 Interpretation


eiusdem generis
        BACKGROUND AND RECORDAL
                     SALE


PURCHASE PRICE
  4,451,219
  4,451,219
  th
     CLOSING AND IMPLEMENTATION
         and
                      WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS BY THE SELLER


Purchaser Annexure A
  Annexure A
   WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS BY THE PURCHASER
                     CONFIDENTIALITY


PERMITTED DISCLOSURES


PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS
     ARBITRATION





AGREEMENT, NO AMENDMENT


DOMICILIUM CITANDI ET EXECUTANDI


NO CESSION OR ASSIGNMENT
            COSTS


/s/ DJ Pretorius DJ Pretorius Group Legal Counsel
                                          /s/ WT Beer WT Beer Regional General Manager Assets & Commercial For : CGR
        /s/ MP Ncholo MP Ncholo Director


ANNEXURE A – WARRANTIES
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 5:10cv269-RH/EMT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ELAINE FRANCES VILIMEK,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv269-RH/EMT

KENNETH S. APFEL,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DENIAL OF BENEFITS

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 25. No objections have been filed. Upon 

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The Commissioner’s decision denying the plaintiff’s application for 

disability benefits is AFFIRMED. The clerk must enter judgment and close the 

file.

SO ORDERED on January 24, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00269-RH-EMT Document 26 Filed 01/24/12 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HARRY MICHAEL WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-474-SPM-GRJ

MORRIS YOUNG, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on notification from the Clerk’s office that Plaintiff

has mailed subpoenas to several non-parties. Plaintiff filed a number of discovery

motions, which the Court construed as motions for issuance of subpoenas for the

production of documents from non-parties. (Docs. 31, 33, 36, 37, 40, 42.) The Court

denied each of these motions. (Docs. 39, 41, 43.)

As the Court noted in its prior orders denying Plaintiff’s discovery motions, a pro

se plaintiff may be entitled to the issuance of a subpoena commanding the production

of documents from a non-party, upon Court approval. Plaintiff has not received Court

approval for issuance of subpoenas, and it is improper for him to send subpoenas that

have not been issued by the Court directly to non-parties. 

Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiff must immediately cease mailing subpoenas to non-parties. 

Plaintiff is cautioned that if he continues to mail subpoenas to non-parties

without Court approval, he will be subject to sanctions, which may include

Case 4:10-cv-00474-SPM-GRJ Document 44 Filed 07/25/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

fines and ultimately, dismissal of his lawsuit. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 25 day of July 2012. 

th 

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 4:10-cv-474-SPM-GRJ

Case 4:10-cv-00474-SPM-GRJ Document 44 Filed 07/25/12 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009257EN.01001601.xml

| 27.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/16

---

Special Report No 9/2009 ‘The efficiency and effectiveness of the personnel selection activities carried out by the European Personnel Selection Office’

2009/C 257/03

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 9/2009 ‘The efficiency and effectiveness of the personnel selection activities carried out by the European Personnel Selection Office’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
# C_2009270EN.01001801.xml

| 11.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/18

---

Composition of the Chambers and attachment of the Judges to Chambers

2009/C 270/06

By decision of 30 November 2005 (1), the Tribunal decided to sit in three Chambers and as a full Court. By decision of 24 September 2008 (2), for the period from 1 October 2008 to 30 September 2011, the Tribunal elected as President of the First Chamber Judge S. GERVASONI. By decision of 7 October 2009, for the period from 7 October 2009 to 30 September 2011, the Tribunal elected as President of the Second Chamber Judge H. TAGARAS and attached the Judges to the Chambers as follows:

1

2

| | First Chamber

  S. GERVASONI, President of Chamber,
  H. KREPPEL and M.I. ROFES I PUJOL, Judges, |
| --- | --- |

First Chamber

First Chamber

S. GERVASONI, President of Chamber,

H. KREPPEL and M.I. ROFES I PUJOL, Judges,

| | Second Chamber

  H. TAGARAS, President of Chamber,
  I. BORUTA and S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH, Judges, |
| --- | --- |

Second Chamber

Second Chamber

H. TAGARAS, President of Chamber,

I. BORUTA and S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH, Judges,

| | Third Chamber, sitting with three Judges

  P. MAHONEY, President of the Tribunal,
  H. KREPPEL, I. BORUTA, S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH and M.I. ROFES I PUJOL, Judges. |
| --- | --- |

Third Chamber, sitting with three Judges

Third Chamber, sitting with three Judges

P. MAHONEY, President of the Tribunal,

H. KREPPEL, I. BORUTA, S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH and M.I. ROFES I PUJOL, Judges.

In the Third Chamber, the President will sit, alternately, either with Judges H. KREPPEL and S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH or with Judges I. BORUTA and M.I. ROFES I PUJOL, subject always to connections between cases.

---

(1)  OJ C 322, 17.12.2005, p. 16.

1

(2)  OJ C 272, 25.10.2008, p. 3.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 216 (Thursday, November 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5577]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Notice of Availability of the Biennial Report to Congress on the 
Status of Children in Head Start Programs

AGENCY: Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Department of 
Health and Human Services.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Administration for Children and Families announces 
publication of the Biennial Report to the Congress on the Status of 
Children in Head Start Programs, Fiscal Year 2005. The report is 
mandated under Section 650 of the Head Start Act, as amended, which 
requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to submit a report 
to the Congress at least once during every two-year period on the 
status of children in Head Start programs. During fiscal year 2005 more 
than 906,000 children were enrolled in Head Start programs including 
62,000 children in Early Head Start programs serving children between 
birth and three years of age.

Effective Dates: November 8, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Persons wishing to receive a copy of the Biennial Report to 
Congress on the Status of Children in Head Start Programs, Fiscal Year 
2005 may contact the Head Start Publication Center on 866-763-6481. 
Copies of the report may also be obtained by accessing the Office of 
Head Start Web site at http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ohs.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia E. Brown, Acting Director, 
Office of Head Start, 1250 Maryland Avenue, SW., 8th floor, Washington, 
DC 20024.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Head Start and Early Head Start programs 
are authorized under the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9801 et seq.). Head 
Start is a national program providing comprehensive developmental 
services to low-income preschool children, primarily age three to age 
of compulsory school attendance, and their families. To help enrolled 
children achieve their full potential, Head Start programs provide 
comprehensive health, nutritional, educational, social and other 
services. Section 650 of the Head Start Act requires that the Secretary 
publish a Biennial Report of the Status of Children in Head Start 
Programs. The fiscal year 2005 Biennial Report provides information 
about children enrolled in the program and the services they receive. 
During fiscal year 2005 more than 906,000 were enrolled in Head Start 
programs. Head Start operated 49,000 classrooms in more than 19,000 
Head Start centers at an average annual cost per child of $7,287. Over 
1,300,000 volunteers contributed their services to Head Start programs.

    Dated: October 25, 2007.
Patricia E. Brown,
Acting Director, Office of Head Start.
[FR Doc. 07-5577 Filed 11-7-08; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Derbyshire Machine & Tool Co. ) ASBCA No. 62671-ADR

)

Under Contract No. SPE7M3-19-P-4007 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Paul Trenholm

 President

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

 DLA Chief Trial Attorney

John J. Pritchard, Esq.

Eric C. Selke, Esq.

 Trial Attorneys

 DLA Land and Maritime

 Columbus, OH

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: January 12, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62671-ADR, Appeal of Derbyshire 

Machine & Tool Co., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: January 12, 2022

JAMES R. SWEET

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
#### In the Matter of the Petition of HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF DURHAM for Administrative Review of Decision of Commissioner of Revenue Concerning Claim for Refund of Sales and Use Taxes for Period Beginning September 1, 1963, and Ending December 31, 1963.

(Filed 24 November, 1965.)

Taxation § 29—

A judgment denying a bousing authority refund of sales taxes on articles purchased by it from retailers affirmed on authority of *Sousing Authority v. Johnson, Commissioner of Bevenue,*261 N.C. 76.

Appeal by petitioner from *Copeland, S.J.,*August 1965 Nonjury Civil Session of Waice.

This action was brought by petitioner, Housing Authority of the City of Durham, a public body organized pursuant to Chapter 157 of the General Statutes, for a refund of sales taxes which it had paid on purchases from retailers during the year 1963. Claim for refund was made according to the provisions of G.S. 105-266.1. The Commissioner of Revenue denied the claim and the Tax Review Board sustained his decision. G.S. 105-241.2. Petitioner then applied for judicial review by the Superior Court of Wake County as. provided by G.S. 105-241.3 and G.S. 143-306, *et seq.*From its judgment affirming the Tax Review Board, petitioner appeals to this Court.

*Allen, Steed & Pullen; Edwards & Manson; McClelland & Barefoot for petitioner appellant.*

*Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General, and Charles D. Barham, Jr., Assistant Attorney General for respondent appellee.*

*720Pee Cueiam.

The precise question presented by this appeal was decided adversely to petitioner in *Housing Authority v. Johnson, Comr. of Revenue,*261 N.C. 76, 134 S.E. 2d 121. The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                         |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ended March 31, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of League Now Holdings      Corporation. |

| Date:        May 15, 2009   |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
| League      Now Holdings Corporation. |

| By:    | /s/      James Pregiato                                                                               |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | James      Pregiato                                                                                   |
|   | President,      Chief Executive Officer,Chief Financial OfficerSecretary,      Treasurer and Director |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STUART W. RYAN, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-336/RS-MD

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF 

THE UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA, 

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are Defendant’s Motions in Limine (Docs. 86, 87, 88, and 89), and 

Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 103). After hearing, IT IS ORDERED: 

1. Plaintiff is not permitted to introduce evidence of another professor’s successful 

application for promotion to associate professor because Plaintiff’s application 

was for a different position, that of full professor. Defendant’s Motion in Limine 

Number 1 (Doc. 89) is GRANTED. 

2. Defendant’s Motion in Limine Number 2 (Doc. 86) is DENIED without prejudice. 

3. Plaintiff is not permitted to introduce evidence of allegedly retaliatory action that 

were not specified in the FCHR charge. Such acts are not mere background, but 

are irrelevant and prejudicial. Defendant’s Motion in Limine Number 3 (Doc. 87) 

is GRANTED. 

4. Plaintiff is not permitted to introduce evidence concerning Plaintiff’s role as 

witness in a sexual harassment investigation conducted in 2006. Such acts are 

Case 3:10-cv-00336-RS-CJK Document 106 Filed 07/06/11 Page 1 of 2
irrelevant and prejudicial. Defendant’s Motion in Limine Number 4 (Doc. 88) is 

GRANTED. 

ORDERED on July 6, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00336-RS-CJK Document 106 Filed 07/06/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DAVID CLEGG et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv81-RH/WCS

DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE

JUSTICE et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING EXPERT AND SUMMARY-JUDGMENT

DEADLINES AND CONTINUING THE TRIAL

The plaintiffs’ unopposed motion, ECF No. 46, to extend specific deadlines

is GRANTED. The deadline for the plaintiffs’ Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

26(a)(2) disclosures is extended to November 23, 2010. The deadline for

defendants’ 26(a)(2) disclosures is extended to December 19, 2010. The deadline

for fact discovery remains November 30, 2010. Depositions of experts may be

taken until December 31, 2010. The deadline for filing a summary-judgment

motion is extended to January 14, 2011. In order to accommodate the new

summary-judgment deadline, the trial is rescheduled for the two-week trial period

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH-WCS Document 47 Filed 10/07/10 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:04cv296-RH/WCS

that begins on Monday, March 7, 2011. The deadlines to begin and complete

mediation remain December 14 and December 28, 2010. 

SO ORDERED on October 7, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge 

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH-WCS Document 47 Filed 10/07/10 Page 2 of 2
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-09-00569- CV
P aul Gajkowsk i, Appellan t

v. CACH, LLC, Appellee
F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ASTROP CO UNTY, 21ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 268 58, H ONO RAB LE CHRI STO P HER DARROW DUGGAN, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Paul Gajkowski has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss this appea l. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Waldrop Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: Apr il 29, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-24]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 08-24 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: October 19, 2007.

L.M. Bynum,

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 60654)          ( print page 60655)          ( print page 60656)          ( print page 60657)          ( print page 60658)          ( print page 60659)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-5276 Filed 10-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JAMES HAMRAC, et al.

vs

DOREL INDUSTRIES INC, et al.

Case No. 3:09cv390-RV/MD

ORDER

Plaintiffs’ “MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT FILED BY THE DEFENDANT,” and “STATEMENT OF MATERIAL

FACTS IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT” (electronically filed 3/25/2010, docs.24,25), were referred to the undersigned

with the following deficiencies:

The documents do not have a Certificate of Service as required by Rule 5(b) and

(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, showing proper service.

The document titled “MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION...” is not

double-spaced as required by N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.1.(B)(3).

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

The document shall remain in the electronic file, but the court will not consider it until

you have corrected the above deficiencies through the filing of a corrected document. 

DONE and ORDERED this 29th day of March, 2010.

 /s Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00390-RV-MD Document 29 Filed 03/29/10 Page 1 of 1