alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Labwire, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof ("Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:
 
 1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:
      December 23, 2008
                By: /s/ G. Dexter
      MorrisG.
      Dexter Morris, Chief Executive
Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Labwire, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the peiod ending June 30,      2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of MD      Holdings Corp. |

|                                  | MD      Holdings, Corp. |
|---------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                  |                    |
| Date: August      26,  2009 | By:           | /s/      Marshall Davis |
|                                  |                    | Marshall      Davis |
|                                  |                    | Chief      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Director and Principal      AccountingOfficer  |
#### CHARLES B. SMITH v. JOYCE LEE HARRIS.

(Filed 29 April, 1964.)

Appeal by defendant from *Nimocks, E. J.,*October 1963 Civil Session of HARNETT.

Civil action to recover damages to an automobile arising out of a collision of two automobiles in a street intersection in the town of Dunn.

Defendant in his answer denied negligence and conditionally pleaded contributory negligence of plaintiff as a bar to recovery.

The case was first heard at the October Term 1961 of Harnett County recorder’s court and resulted in a judgment of compulsory nonsuit. Plaintiff appealed from the judgment to the superior court. In the superior court the case was heard *de novo.*Issues of (1) negligence, of (2) contributory negligence, and of (3) damages were submitted to the jury. The jury answered the first issue Yes, the second issue No, and awarded plaintiff damages in the sum of $250. From a judgment on the verdict, defendant appeals.

*Morgan and Williams for defendant appellant.*

*Wilson •& Bain by Edgar B. Bain and E. Marshall Woodall for plaintiff appellee.*

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff offered evidence; defendant offered none. Defendant’s sole assignment of error is to the denial of his motion for *741judgment of compulsory nonsuit. This action arose out of two automobiles colliding in a street intersection. Since the advent of automobiles in large numbers, our Reports have been filled with such cases, and the applicable rules of law have been stated and repeated and repeated time after time. A study of the evidence in the instant case shows that the plaintiff has sufficient evidence to carry the case to the jury, that defendant was negligent in the operation of his automobile, and that such negligence was a proximate cause of the damage to plaintiff's automobile, and further that plaintiff has not proved himself out of court so as to be nonsuited on the ground of contributory negligence.

The verdict and judgment below will not be disturbed.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY NAME                                              JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
<S>                                                          <C>
Blyvooruitzicht Gold Mining Company Limited                  South Africa
Buffelsfontein Gold Mines Limited                            South Africa
West Witwatersrand Gold Holdings Limited                     South Africa
Crown Consolidated Gold Recoveries Limited                   South Africa
Stand 752 Parktown Extension (Pty) Limited                   South Africa
DRD International Aps (Pty) Limited                          Denmark
DRD Australasia Services Company (Pty) Limited               Australia
DRD Australia APS                                            Denmark
DRD (Isle of Man) Limited                                    Isle of Man
DRD (Porgera) Limited                                        Papua New Guinea
Tolukuma Gold Mines Limited                                  Papua New Guinea
Fortis (Pty) Limited                                         Papua New Guinea
Net-Gold Services Limited                                    Bermuda
</TABLE>
----

----

|  ý                                                  |  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010  |
| OR                                                            |
|                                                  |  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |

|   | For the transition period from |   | to |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|--------|----|--------|

| New York(State or other jurisdiction ofincorporation or organization) |   | 13-2691380(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.) |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

|   | (a) | Exhibits |
|--------|-----|----------|

|   | 31.1 | Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|--------|------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|--------|------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 32.1 | Joint Certification of principal executive officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| By:        /s/ Samuel R. Newborn |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Samuel R. Newborn                                                        |   |
| principal executive officer                                              |   |
|                                                                     |   |
|                                                                     |   |
|                                                                     |   |
|                                                                     |   |
| By:       /s/ Bruce R. Foster         |   |
|        Bruce R. Foster,               |   |
|    Executive Vice President,                              |   |
|    Treasurer, Chief Financial                             |   |
| Officer and principal accounting officer                            |   |
|                             |   |
|                                                                     |   |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TYRONE RAHMINGS, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv240/RS-CJK

DAVID ELLIS, et al,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. 17) and the

Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18). 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on May 4, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00240-RS-CJK Document 20 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 1
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

In connection with the annual report
on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 of ECtel Ltd. (the
Company) as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Commission) on the date hereof (the Report) and pursuant to 17 CFR
240.13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Itzik Weinstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify that:

| | (1) | the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 12, 2009

|/s/ Itzik WeinsteinItzik WeinsteinPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 



---

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JED PHILIP LARSON, SR.,

 Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv246/RS/MD

N. ROBINSON, et. al,

 Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff initiated

this action on September 13, 2010 by filing a pleading titled, “Petition for Emergency

Injunction.” (Doc. 1). Because the application for injunctive relief was not

accompanied by the $350.00 filing fee or an application for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, this court entered an order on September 24, 2010 directing plaintiff to pay

the $350.00 filing fee or file a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis

within twenty-eight days. (Doc. 3). Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with

the order would result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action. 

Plaintiff did not respond to the order. Accordingly, on November 10, 2010, this

court issued an order directing plaintiff to show cause, within fourteen days, why

this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court. 

(Doc. 4). That deadline has passed, and plaintiff has neither responded to the order,

nor complied with the court’s September 24, 2010 order.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this cause be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure

to comply with an order of the court.
Page 2 of 2

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 2 day of December, 2010. nd

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within fourteen days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that

may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Case No: 5:10cv246/RS/MD
# C_2010111EN.01000101.xml

| 30.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 April 2010

2010/C 111/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3256 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4421 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86785 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6267 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4348 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8430 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,540 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,28 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7081 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9153 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1370 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9673 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4272 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3292 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2936 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8339 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8145 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 477,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7596 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0484 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2460 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 948,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2320 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,186 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,7577 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,797 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3044 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,2651 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,0090 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3256

JPY

Japanese yen

124,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4421

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86785

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6267

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4348

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8430

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,540

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,28

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7081

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9153

RON

Romanian leu

4,1370

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9673

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4272

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3292

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2936

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8339

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8145

KRW

South Korean won

1 477,79

ZAR

South African rand

9,7596

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0484

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2460

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 948,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2320

PHP

Philippine peso

59,186

RUB

Russian rouble

38,7577

THB

Thai baht

42,797

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3044

MXN

Mexican peso

16,2651

INR

Indian rupee

59,0090

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2010058EN.01000201.xml

| 10.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 March 2010

2010/C 58/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3557 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4417 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90640 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7280 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4626 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0410 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,666 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 267,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7084 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8954 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1000 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0894 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4938 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3962 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5208 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9432 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8990 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 538,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,0980 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2544 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2628 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 487,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5301 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,035 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,3985 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,379 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4345 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2072 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,8270 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3557

JPY

Japanese yen

121,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4417

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90640

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7280

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4626

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0410

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,666

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

267,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7084

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8954

RON

Romanian leu

4,1000

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0894

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4938

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3962

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5208

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9432

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8990

KRW

South Korean won

1 538,21

ZAR

South African rand

10,0980

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2544

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2628

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 487,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5301

PHP

Philippine peso

62,035

RUB

Russian rouble

40,3985

THB

Thai baht

44,379

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4345

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2072

INR

Indian rupee

61,8270

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                     0000057055
<NAME>                             KV PHARMACEUTICAL
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         5,613
<SECURITIES>                                   4,966
<RECEIVABLES>                                  21,488
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    23,448
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               59,026
<PP&E>                                         20,702
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          18,711
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2
<COMMON>                                       120
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,082
<SALES>                                        32,794
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             581
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,452
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,073
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,379
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,379
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .17



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40823 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SALVADOR VARGAS NAVARRO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CV-376 USDC No. 4:96-CR-63-2

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Salvador Vargas Navarro, federal prisoner # 05101-010, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion as untimely. He maintains that because he filed his motion within one year of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and because Apprendi effected a substantive change in criminal law, it is applicable to his case. ApprendiNo. 02-40823 -2- is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review.
See United States v. Brown , 305 F.3d 304, 305-09 (5th Cir. 2002), petition for cert. filed (U.S. Feb. 3, 2003)(No. 02-9606). The argument is foreclosed by the law of this circuit. Id. The judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.
# C_2010182EN.01000101.xml

| 7.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.5675 — Syngenta/Monsanto's Sunflower Seed Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2010/C 182/01)

On 21 June 2010, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301 / 22967244) or by post, under reference COMP/M.5675 — Syngenta/Monsanto's Sunflower Seed Business, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---