alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20748 Summary Calendar

OWIN DANZELL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; HIPOLITO M. ACOSTA, Acting District Director of the Houston District Office of

The Immigration and Naturalization Service,

Respondents-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CV-3612

-------------------- February 13, 2003

Before BARKSDALE, DEMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Owin Danzell, a native of Trinidad admitted to the United

States in 1989 as a permanent resident alien, appeals the district

court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Danzell’s petition challenged an order of

deportation in which it was determined that he was removable as an

aggravated felon pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) on2

account of his state cocaine-possession convictions. The district

court determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the

28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition because the arguments raised therein had

been rejected by this court in dismissing Danzell’s direct petition

for review of the deportation order. Alternatively, the district

court determined that Danzell’s arguments were foreclosed by this

court’s precedent.

It is unclear from the record w hether Danzell’s direct

petition for review to this court raised the same issues asserted

in the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In any event,

the arguments Danzell raised in his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

concerning whether his state controlled-substance convictions are

“aggravated felonies” are foreclosed by this court’s precedent.

S ee United States v. Hernandez-Avalos , 251 F.3d 505 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied 122 S. Ct. 305 (2001); United States v. HinojosaLopez , 130 F.3d 691 (5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Lawrence Chimerine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that the Annual Report of First Transaction
Management, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of First Transaction Management, Inc.




/s/
      Lawrence ChimerineLawrence
      ChimerinePresident and Chief Executive
      OfficerFirst Transaction Management,
      Inc.





Date:
March 27, 2009
#### FRANCES QUEEN ROBERTS v. LOYAL OWEN ROBERTS.

(Filed 10 November, 1965.)

Appeal by defendant from order entered February 6, 1965 by *Walter E. Johnston, Jr., Resident Judge,*in an action pending in For-syth Superior Court.

This action was instituted December 6, 1961, for divorce from bed and board, custody of minor children and attorney’s fee.

Plaintiff and defendant were married on or about September 7, 1949. Three children were born of the marriage, Sharon Joan, Vicki Lynn and Allen Robin.

After hearing, an order was entered by Johnston, J., on December 27, 1961, in which plaintiff was awarded full custody and control of said minor children and defendant was ordered to pay $30.00 per week for the support of plaintiff and of said children and a fee to plaintiff’s counsel.

Subsequently, in the Superior Court of Wilkes County, ■ defendant obtained an absolute divorce on the ground of two years separation.

On January 29, 1965, plaintiff filed a motion that the court order defendant to pay $50.00 per week for the support of said three children; to pay designated medical and hospital bills incurred in behalf of one or more of said children; and to reimburse the First Federal Savings and Loan Association on account of its payment of delinquent taxes on the residence property originally owned by plaintiff and defendant as tenants by entirety and in which plaintiff and said three children reside.

On February 6, 1965, after a hearing on plaintiff’s motion, defendant’s answer thereto and affidavits, Johnston, J., based on findings of fact set forth therein, entered an order providing:

“Now THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the weekly support payments heretofore ordered to be paid by the defendant for the support of the three minor children of the marriage be increased from $30.00 per week to $45.00 per week, said payments to be made each week on or before Friday of each week, beginning on the 12th day of February 1965, and continuing each and every Friday thereafter until further ordered by this Court, for the use and benefit of Sharon Joan Roberts, Vicki Lynn Roberts, and Allen Robin Roberts; that the defendant pay H. Glenn Pettyjohn, Attorney for the petitioner and said minor children, the sum of $125.00; and that the costs of this action be taxed by the Clerk against the defendant.”

Defendant excepted to said order and to specified findings of fact set forth therein and appealed.

*601
      *H. Glenn Pettyjohn for plaintiff appellee.*

*H. Grady Barnhill, Jr. and John E. Hall for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

There is no contention that, in relation to the needs of the children, the amount of the required payments is excessive. The findings challenged by defendant relate to defendant’s ability to make such payments. However, in our view, the evidence was sufficient to support each of the challenged findings of fact; and the findings of fact fully support the judgment.

It is noted that the cause is open for furl her orders. If conditions warrant modification of the ordm of February 6, 1965, plaintiff or defendant is at liberty to move lor such modification.

Affirmed.
# CA2009098DE.01001401.xml

| 29.4.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 98/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 98/14

---

Die Veröffentlichung der Stellenausschreibung im

  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 23 A vom 29. Januar 2009
  betreffend den Dienstposten eines Direktors (w/m) der Direktion Finanzen, Haushalt und Rechnungsführung war fehlerhaft. Das Korrigendum der Fehler ist beigefügt. Die Bewerber verfügen über eine Frist von 10 Werktagen ab der Veröffentlichung dieses Korrigendums, um ihre Bewerbungen an den Generalsekretär des Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses, Herrn Martin WESTLAKE, Büro JDE 4190, Rue Belliard 99, 1040 Brüssel, zu richten

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

(2009/C 98 A/03)

Seite 1, Ziffer 2 Absatz 1

Veröffentlichte Fassung

| 2. | Art der Tätigkeit:
  Der unmittelbar dem Generalsekretär unterstellte Direktor (w/m) ist mit der Leitung der Direktion Human — und Finanzressourcen des Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses (EWSA) betraut und verfügt über ein Jahresbudget von rund 125 Millionen EUR. Er trägt zur strategischen Entwicklung der Direktion bei. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Art der Tätigkeit:

Der unmittelbar dem Generalsekretär unterstellte Direktor (w/m) ist mit der Leitung der Direktion Human — und Finanzressourcen des Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses (EWSA) betraut und verfügt über ein Jahresbudget von rund 125 Millionen EUR. Er trägt zur strategischen Entwicklung der Direktion bei.

Korrekte Fassung

| 2. | Art der Tätigkeit:
  Der unmittelbar dem Generalsekretär unterstellte Direktor (w/m) ist mit der Leitung der Direktion Finanzen, Haushalt und Rechnungsführung des Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses (EWSA) betraut und verfügt über ein Jahresbudget von rund 125 Millionen EUR. Er trägt zur strategischen Entwicklung der Direktion bei. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Art der Tätigkeit:

Der unmittelbar dem Generalsekretär unterstellte Direktor (w/m) ist mit der Leitung der Direktion Finanzen, Haushalt und Rechnungsführung des Europäischen Wirtschafts- und Sozialausschusses (EWSA) betraut und verfügt über ein Jahresbudget von rund 125 Millionen EUR. Er trägt zur strategischen Entwicklung der Direktion bei.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LEE CHAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-381-SPM-GRJ

DUSTIN MILLENDER,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On January 12, 2011, the Court issued a second show cause order directing

Plaintiff to file a prisoner consent form and account information in support of his motion

for leave to proceed as a pauper on or before February 2, 2011. The Court warned

Plaintiff that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that the case be

dismissed. Doc. 12. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has failed to respond. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed for

failure to comply with an order of the Court and for failure to prosecute. 

IN CHAMBERS, at Gainesville, Florida, this 22 day of April 2011.

nd

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case 4:10-cv-00381-SPM-GRJ Document 13 Filed 04/22/11 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:09cr82 LAC

MICHAEL PHILLIP KESSLER

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on October 21, 2009 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR GARCIA HEARING 

Filed by GOVERNMENT on10/21/09 Doc.# 20

RESPONSES:

 BY DEFENDANT on11/4/09 Doc.# 38

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 18 day of

th

November, 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is GRANTED.

(b)

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Document No.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHRISTIAN JAMES NAVOY,

Petitioner,

vs. 3:10cv35/MCR/MD

MICHAEL BABCOCK, et al.,

Respondents.

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon the filing of respondents’ answer to the

amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 14). Before the court rules on this

matter, the petitioner shall have an opportunity to respond.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Petitioner shall have twenty-eight (28) days from the date this order is entered

on the docket in which to respond to the answer filed by respondents.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of April, 2010.

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
#### WOODS v. ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. 45 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 650.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 April 1972.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Autobytel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), we, James E. Riesenbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Monty A. Houdeshell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ JAMES E. RIESENBACHJames E. RiesenbachChief Executive OfficerMarch 17, 2008




/s/ MONTY A. HOUDESHELLMonty A. HoudeshellExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerMarch 17, 2008


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Autobytel Inc. and will be retained by Autobytel
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2010036EN.01000101.xml

| 13.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5734 — Liberty Global Europe/Unitymedia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 36/01

On 25 January 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5734. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5734. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 12.4

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Ian Louis Murray, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
DRDGOLD Limited.

2) Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual
Report.




                             Date: April 1, 2005

                             /s/ Ian Louis Murray
                             ------------------------------
                             Ian Louis Murray
                             Chief Financial Officer
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-14-00028-CV

_________________

IN RE MUJTABA ALI KHAN

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this original mandamus proceeding Mujtaba Ali Khan (“Khan”) contends 

that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering a show cause hearing for 

alleged violations of two temporary injunction orders (“the temporary injunction 

orders”). See Xenon Anesthesia of Tex. P.L.L.C. v. Xenon Health L.L.C., No. 09-

12-00553-CV, 2013 WL 1279408, at *4 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Mar. 28, 2013, no 

pet.) (mem. op.). Khan argues the temporary injunction orders are void because the 

trial court granted Khan’s motion for continuance and re-set the trial date to a later 

date than the trial dates contained in the temporary injunction orders. The trial 

court reset the trial date for February 10, 2014. Khan asks this Court to issue a 
2

temporary stay of the trial court proceedings and to issue a writ of mandamus 

directing the trial court (1) to vacate its order setting the show cause hearing, and 

(2) to dissolve the temporary injunctions. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(c); see also 

Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b).

After reviewing the petition for writ of mandamus and the mandamus 

record, we conclude that the relator has not established an abuse of discretion by 

the trial court. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex.

2004) (orig. proceeding); In re CI Host, Inc., 92 S.W.3d 514, 516 (Tex. 2002)

(orig. proceeding). We deny the petition for writ of mandamus and motion for 

temporary relief. See Tex. R.App. P. 52.8(a).

PETITION DENIED. 

PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered January 16, 2014

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2153 

To require a report on the effects of climate change on the Coast Guard, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2019 

Mr. MARKEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require a report on the effects of climate change on 

the Coast Guard, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON 

4 COAST GUARD. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commandant of 

7 the Coast Guard shall submit to the Committee on Com8 merce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the 

9 Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 

10 House of Representatives a report on vulnerabilities of inVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:50 Jul 20, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2153.IS S2153

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2153 IS

1 stallations of the Coast Guard resulting from climate 

2 change and requirements for mitigating climate change3 related effects on the Coast Guard over the 20-year period 

4 beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

5 (b) ELEMENTS.—The report required by subsection 

6 (a) shall include the following: 

7 (1) A list of the ten most vulnerable installa8 tions of the Coast Guard based on the effects of cli9 mate change, including rising sea tides, increased 

10 flooding, drought, desertification, wildfires, thawing 

11 permafrost, and any other effects the Commandant 

12 considers necessary. 

13 (2) An overview of mitigations that may be nec14 essary to ensure the continued operational viability 

15 and to increase the resiliency of the installations list16 ed under paragraph (1) and the cost of such mitiga17 tions. 

18 (3) A discussion of the climate change-related 

19 effects on the Coast Guard, including— 

20 (A) the increase in the frequency of hu21 manitarian assistance and disaster relief mis22 sions; and 

23 (B) the campaign plans, contingency plans, 

24 and operational posture of the Coast Guard. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2153 IS

1 (4) An overview of mitigations that may be nec2 essary to ensure mission resiliency and the cost of 

3 such mitigations. 

4 (c) FORM.—The report required by subsection (a) 

5 shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include 

6 a classified annex. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Genesis Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Anthony J. Cataldo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 20, 2011
By:
/s/ Anthony J. CataldoAnthony J. CataldoChief Executive Officer
 This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

December 21, 2007

Mr. L. Frank Oliver

Oliver & Oliver, P.C.

P.O. Box 489

Austin, TX 78767-0489

Ms. Rebekah Marie Geistweidt

Geistweidt Law Firm

P.O. Box 1909

Mason, TX 76856

Mr. Lindsay Lee Lambert

Hughes Watters & Askanase, L.L.P.

333 Clay, 29th Floor

Houston, TX 77002

Mr. A. Gerald Geistweidt

Geistweidt & Whitworth, P.C.

P.O. Box 1909

Mason, TX 76856

RE:Case Number:  06-1016

Court of Appeals Number:  04-05-00548-CV

Trial Court Number:  14638

Style:LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A/K/A LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE AND LASALLE NATIONAL BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER THE POOLING AND SERVICING AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 1, 1999, SERIES 1999-2

v.

LORAE WHITE AND GERALD GEISTWEIDT

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed per curiam opinion and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 06-1016Page 2**