alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Tennessee Valley Authority

# AGENCY:

Tennessee Valley Authority.

# ACTION:

Proposed collection; comment request. 

# SUMMARY:

The proposed information collection described below will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended). The Tennessee Valley Authority is soliciting public comments on this proposed collection as provided by 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1). Requests for information, including copies of the information collection proposed and supporting documentation, should be directed to the Agency Clearance Officer: Alice D. Witt, Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Street (EB 5B), Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402-2801; (423) 751-6832. (SC: 0013XYV) Comments should be sent to the Agency Clearance Officer no later than January 2, 2008.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Type of Request:*                     Regular submission.                

*Title of Information Collection:*                     Power Distributor Monthly and Annual Reports to TVA (3316-0002).                

*Frequency of Use:*                     Monthly and Annual.                

*Type of Affected Public:*                     Business or Local Government.                

*Small Businesses or Organizations Affected:*                     Yes.                

*Federal Budget Functional Category Code:*                     271.                

*Estimated Number of Annual Responses:*                     2,054.                

*Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours:*                     3,792.                

*Estimated Average Burden Hours per Response:*                     1.8 hours.                

*Need for and Use of Information:*                     This information collection supplies TVA with financial and accounting information to help ensure that electric power produced by TVA is sold to consumers at rates which are as low as feasible.                

Steven A. Anderson,

Senior Manager, IT Planning & Governance, Information Services.

[FR Doc. 07-5462 Filed 11-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8120-08-M
**Exhibit 23.1**






**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**






We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
      333-130495, 333-131277, 333-135366  on
      Form S-8 of our report, dated July 20, 2006, appearing in this Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB of CanWest Petroleum Corporation for the year ended
      April 30, 2006.




/s/
      Pannell Kerr Forster





Registered
      with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board as “Smythe
      Ratcliffe”


INDEPENDENT
      REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Vancouver,
      Canada


July
      21,
      2006
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 19, 2019.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01252

- CR

HEATHER MARIE TETER , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 371st District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1512130D


### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Whitehill, Partida

- Kipness, and Pedersen, III

Opinion by Justice Pedersen, III On May 23, 2019, a supplemental clerk’s record wa s filed containing appellant’s t wo pro

se motions to dismiss this appeal. The motions are handwritten and signed by appellant , but they
are not signed by her counsel

. Under Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, both
the appellant and her attorney “must sign the written motion to dismiss.” T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 42.2(a).
On May 29, 2019, this Court forwarded a copy of appellant’s motions to her counsel, Eric

Labovitz , and requested that Labovitz file a supplemental mo tion to dismiss should he agre e that
this appeal should be dismissed. On July 10, 2019, Labowitz filed a motion dismiss and requested

that we withdraw appellant’s notice of appeal and dismiss her appeal . We GRANT the foregoing

motions to dismiss

. See id

.– 2

–

We dismiss the appeal

.

Do No Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b)

181252F.U05 /Bill Pedersen, III/ BILL PEDERSEN, III JUSTICE– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

HEATHER MARIE TETER, Appellant

No. 05

- 18

- 01252

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 371st District Court, Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1512130D. Opinion delivered by Justice Pedersen, III. Justices Whitehill and Partida

- Kipness participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered this 19th day of July, 2019.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TERESA YATES and her spouse, 

LEE YATES

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv226/RS-GRJ

WAL-MART STORES, INC., d/b/a

Walmart Supercenter Store #818,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

Before me is the Report of Parties’ Planning Meeting (Doc. 10). The 

attorneys have disregarded the guidance in the Initial Scheduling Order regarding 

the discovery deadline and a trial date.

It is ordered that the parties shall file an amended joint report not later than 

October 28, 2010, with dates consistent with a discovery deadline of February 18, 

2011, and a jury trial on May 9, 2011 or May 23, 2011. 

ORDERED on October 18, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 1 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 2 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 3 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 4 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 5 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 6 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 7 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 8 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 9 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 10 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 11 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 12 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 13 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 14 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 15 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 16 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 17 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 18 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 19 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 20 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 21 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 22 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 23 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 24 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 25 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 26 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 27 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 28 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 29 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 30 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 31 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 32 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 33 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 34 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 35 of 36
Case 3:10-cv-00206-RV-EMT Document 1 Filed 06/12/10 Page 36 of 36
Exhibit 23.1               Consent of McManus & Company, PC
                           Independent Public Accountants


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-110309) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-109481,
333-106074, and 333-97913) of Eagle Broadband, Inc., of our report dated
December 13, 2002, relating to the financial statements, which appear in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

/s/ McManus & Company, PC
-------------------------
McManus & Company, PC
Rockaway, New Jersey
May 28, 2004
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vycor Medical, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



May 15, 2009



|                                                                          |  |  |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/ Kenneth T. Coviello                                                   |  |  |  | 
|Kenneth T. Coviello
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |  |  |  | 
|                                                                          |  |  |  | 
|                                                                          |  |  |  | 
|/s/ Heather N. Jensen                                                     |  |  |  | 
|Heather N. Jensen
President and Principal Executive Officer               |  |  |  | 









---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARNIN ANTONIO VALDEZ-BONILLA,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 08-73560

Agency No. A094-325-689

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 25, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, GRABER and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Arnin Antonio Valdez-Bonilla, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from 

an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding 

of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 2 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73560 

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the 

agency’s factual findings. Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). 

We deny the petition for review.

Valdez-Bonilla does not challenge the agency’s determination that he did 

not establish past persecution. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259-

60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not specifically raised and argued in a party’s opening 

brief are waived). Substantial evidence supports the agency’s conclusion that, 

even if Valdez-Bonilla had timely filed his asylum application, he failed to 

establish a well-founded fear of future persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 

1012, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003); see also INS. v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n.1 

(1992) (“To reverse the BIA finding we must find that the evidence not only 

supports that conclusion, but compels it[.]”). Thus, we deny the petition for review 

as to Valdez-Bonilla’s asylum claim.

Because Valdez-Bonilla failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he 

necessarily cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal.

See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

Finally, substantial evidence also supports the agency’s determination that 
3 08-73560 

Valdez-Bonilla failed to establish it is more likely than not that he would be 

tortured by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government of Honduras. 

See Blandino-Medina v. Holder, 712 F.3d 1338, 1348 (9th Cir. 2013) (petitioner 

did not establish CAT eligibility where he presented a “series of worst-case 

scenarios” rather than “hard evidence of a probability” of torture).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# C_2009074EN.01000301.xml

| 28.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 March 2009

(2009/C 74/02)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3295 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,449 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,9285 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8935 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5189 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,225 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,37 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7096 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,6483 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2515 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2222 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,923 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6446 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3041 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3312 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,016 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 792,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,73 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0838 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4705 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 285,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8061 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,08 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,7692 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,024 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0178 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,1149 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,333 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3295

JPY

Japanese yen

129,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,449

GBP

Pound sterling

0,9285

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8935

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5189

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,225

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,37

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7096

PLN

Polish zloty

4,6483

RON

Romanian leu

4,2515

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2222

AUD

Australian dollar

1,923

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6446

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3041

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3312

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,016

KRW

South Korean won

1 792,41

ZAR

South African rand

12,73

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0838

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4705

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 285,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8061

PHP

Philippine peso

64,08

RUB

Russian rouble

44,7692

THB

Thai baht

47,024

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0178

MXN

Mexican peso

19,1149

INR

Indian rupee

67,333

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cr42-SPM

MICHAEL ALAN REAID,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY PLEA

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to

the Court’s consideration of any Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

11(e)(2), the plea of guilty of the defendant, MICHAEL ALAN REAID, to Count

One of the indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this

Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of July, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of
Simulations Plus, Inc., a California corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2012,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Walter S. Woltosz, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and Momoko A. Beran, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/ Walter S. Woltosz






Walter S. Woltosz

Chief Executive Officer

November 13, 2012



/s/ Momoko A. Beran






Momoko A. Beran

Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2012



(A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Simulations Plus, Inc. and will be retained by Simulations Plus, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.)
Exhibit 99.10(b)

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the use in this Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-229747) of Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company of America of our report dated April 9, 2020 relating to the statutory-basis financial statements of Equitable Financial Life Insurance Company of America, which appears in this Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in such Registration Statement.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, NY

April 21, 2020
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5168 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5168

To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
 establish seaweed as a high-priority research and extension area, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2018

   Mr. Soto introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 to 
 establish seaweed as a high-priority research and extension area, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ESTABLISHING SEAWEED AS A HIGH-PRIORITY RESEARCH AND 
              EXTENSION AREA.

    Effective on October 1, 2018, section 1672 of the Food, 
Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5925) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (d), by adding at the end the following 
        new paragraph:
            ``(11) Seaweed.--Research and extension grants may be made 
        under this section for the purpose of carrying out or enhancing 
        research with respect to the harvesting of seaweed for 
        voluntary use for the livestock, poultry, and food animal 
        production industries for purposes of the reduction of methane 
        emissions.''; and
            (2) in subsection (h), by striking ``2018'' and inserting 
        ``2023''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JAMES COCHRAN, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv122/MCR/EMT

LT. GIELOW, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 22, 2010 (Doc. 7). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply

with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of July, 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2010028EN.01002301.xml

| 4.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/23

---

Amendments to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice

2010/C 28/09

The Agreement amending Protocol 4 to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice signed in Brussels on 1 February 2007 entered into force on 8 October 2007.

This Agreement and the updated consolidated version of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice have now been published on the EFTA Secretariat’s website.

They can be found through the following links:

http://www.efta.int/content/legal-texts/esa-eftacourt/amendments/agreements-amending-protocol-4

and

http://www.efta.int/content/legal-texts/esa-eftacourt/annexes-protocols-agreement

---