alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

PATRICK O. HAMPTON, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10cv215-MP-GRJ

P. BUHLER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated November 7, 2011. (Doc. 17). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.1

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

In his Objections to the Report and Recommendation (doc. 18), plaintiff for the first time argued that

1

he had the right to file a direct grievance to the secretary of the Department of Corrections. The defendants

responded to plaintiff’s objections and submitted the declaration of Rebecca Padgham, a Management

Analyst with the Florida Department of Corrections, Bureau of Inmate Grievance Appeals. Ms. Padgham’s

unsworn declaration states that plaintiff’s grievance appeal did not satisfy the requirements of F.A.C. § 33-

103.007(6) for direct grievances to the Secretary. (Doc. 19-1, p. 3). Pursuant to F.A.C. § 33-103.007(6)(a)(1),

if plaintiff intended to file grievance appeal #10-6-15146 as an emergency grievance, grievance of reprisal,

or grievance of a sensitive nature, he was required to state at the beginning of Part A of Form DC1-303 that

the grievance concerns either an emergency, or was a grievance of a reprisal, or a grievance of a sensitive

nature. F.A.C. § 33-103.007(6)(a)(1); (doc. 19-1, p. 2). In addition, Plaintiff would have had to clearly state

the reason for not initially bringing the complaint to the attention of institutional staff and by-passing the

informal and formal grievance steps of the institution or facility. F.A.C. § 33-103.007(6)(a)(2); (Doc. 19-1, p.

2-3). Plaintiff did not comply with either of those required steps. (Doc. 19-1, p. 3).

Case 1:10-cv-00215-MP-GRJ Document 20 Filed 01/19/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 13) is GRANTED and this case is

DISMISSED for failure to properly exhaust administrative remedies.

DONE and ORDERED this 19th day of January, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 1:10-cv215-MP-GRJ

Case 1:10-cv-00215-MP-GRJ Document 20 Filed 01/19/12 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSHUA S. FRIEBEL and ELIZABETH

F. FRIEBEL,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv120/RS-MD

PARADISE SHORES OF BAY COUNTY,

LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company;

ROBERT E. BLACKERBY; and MAGNUM

CAPITAL, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability

Company,

Defendants

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are Defendants’ Motion In Limine To Exclude Reference To Pleadings

(Doc. 265) and Motion In Limine To Exclude Testimony Of Prior Depositions (Doc. 266). 

Defendants do not specifically identify the deponents and pleadings by docket entry

number or otherwise. Prior sworn testimony in another action by a party may well be

admissible. Admissibility of prior testimony by a non-party witness in another case may be

more limited. Likewise, pleadings filed by a party in another proceeding may or may not

be admissible. A blanket exclusion at this time is inappropriate. 

Defendants’ Motions In Limine (Docs. 265 & 266) are denied without prejudice.

ORDERED on June 2, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00120-RS-CJK Document 289 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 1
#### LEE v. SIMPSON

No. 46 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 611.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 April 1980.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ROBERT F. BARNARD, as

personal representative of the estate 

of Raymond Paulk, and 

ROBIN BAXLEY, as the personal 

representative of the estate of Michael 

Scarberry,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv213/RS-MD

GEICO GENERAL

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Defendant’s motion to dismiss Paulk’s complaint (Doc. 5) is denied. All three 

parties should have an opportunity of litigating the issues in this case. See 13 WILLISTON 

ON CONTRACTS § 37:62 (4th ed.). Defendant’s potential liability to both Barnard and 

Baxley is ameliorated by the rule that a recovery by one bars recovery by the other. 

Thus, ultimately there will only be one satisfaction in this case, should the jury decide to 

award damages. See 13 WILLISTON ON CONTRACTS § 37:53 (4th ed.). 

ORDERED on October 28, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2010126EN.01000102.xml

| 18.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 126/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 126/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5797 — State Street Corporation/Intesa Sanpaolo Servizi Transazionali/Sanpaolo Bank)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 126/02

On 26 April 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5797. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5797. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


April 14, 2020


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 473 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on April 13, 2020, in accordance
with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to
the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration
Statement (No. 333-235924) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the
Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TERRANCE D. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:10cv370/RV/MD

SANTA ROSA COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants.

 

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated December 22, 2010. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court and failure to prosecute this action.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of January, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
|   | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended January 2, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |        |                    |                                  |
|--------|-------------|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|   |  Date: | February  17, 2011 |                                  | By: | /s/ RONALD J. BUSCHUR |
|   |        |                    | Ronald J. Buschur                     |
|   |        |                    | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |        |                    | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.          |
Exhibit
32.02
 
 
 SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rovi Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James Budge certifies in
his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), that to
the best of his knowledge:
  (a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)), and
  (b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.
  IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as of
August 6, 2009.


By:
              /s/ 
      James BudgeJames
      BudgeChief
      Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT.COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
UNITED STATE OF AMERICA
y. CASE NUMBER: 4:10mj080-WJS
IN CAMERA
LEONEL RODRIGUEZ
/

GOVERNMENT?’S MOTION TO SEAL CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

The United States of America, through its undersigned Assistant United States Attorney
does hereby requests that this Court issue an Order sealing the Application for Criminal
Complaint and Affidavit in this matter until a date ordered by the Court. In support of this
motion states as follows:

1, The investigation of this offense involves a long-term and ongoing investigation by
the DEA of various individuals in the Northern District of Florida and elsewhere who are
involved with the trafficking of controlled substances including powder cocaine, cocaine base
(“crack”) and marijuana. The investigation is ongoing, and investigators are continuing the
investigation to include possible controlled purchases of cocaine and/or other controlled
substances and searches of certain locations. These controlled purchases and searches are being
assisted by individuals who have been identified and arrested by DEA in the course of the
investigation who are cooperating but have not as of this date been charged with offenses to
prevent ready detection by other persons of their contact with law enforcement in this
investigation. These purchases and searches would be from as yet unindicted coconspirators.

Public disclosure of any documents associated with the search of this location would likely lead



to the identification of certain persons who are at this time cooperating with law enforcement,
and make any subsequent cooperation both highly unlikely, and further possibly subject both law
enforcement agents and cooperating persons to physical danger if the covert nature of the
investigation were revealed..

2. The United States therefore respectfully requests that this Court grant this Order
sealing the application for and warrant issued as well as that the present motion as well any
filings or proceedings not be entered on the docket of this matter until ordered by the Court.

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the United States respectfully requests that this
motion to seal be granted.

Respectfully submitted,

THOMAS F. KIRWIN
STAPES ATTORNEY

eZ Ss

ERIC K. MOUNTIN
Assistant(U.S. Attorney

Texas BatNo. 00784649

111 North Adams Street, 4th Floor
Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(850) 216-3819

ORDER

The government’s motion is hereby granted.

DONE AND ORDERED this the _/ 4 day of May, 2010.

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, Jr. --,
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2381 

To require review by the Government Accountability Office of screening protocols of the Transportation Security Administration relating to breast 

milk and formula, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2019 

Ms. MCSALLY (for herself, Mr. JONES, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. CRAMER) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require review by the Government Accountability Office 

of screening protocols of the Transportation Security Administration relating to breast milk and formula, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Traveling Parents 

5 Screening Consistency Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2381 IS

1 SEC. 2. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REVIEW OF IMPLEMEN2 TATION BY TRANSPORTATION SECURITY AD3 MINISTRATION OF SCREENING PROTOCOLS 

4 RELATING TO BREAST MILK AND FORMULA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

7 of the United States shall conduct a review of— 

8 (1) the implementation by the Transportation 

9 Security Administration (in this section referred to 

10 as ‘‘TSA’’) of the Bottles and Breastfeeding Equip11 ment Screening Act (Public Law 114–293; 49 

12 U.S.C. 44901 note); and 

13 (2) the effectiveness of TSA in ensuring the 

14 clarity of screening protocols relating to, and the 

15 consistency of screening of, breast milk and other 

16 liquids for the consumption of infants, including for17 mula, purified deionized water, and juice. 

18 (b) ELEMENTS.—The review required by subsection 

19 (a) shall include— 

20 (1) an assessment of— 

21 (A) whether TSA effectively manages the 

22 consistency of the application of protocols to the 

23 screening of breast milk and other liquids de24 scribed in subsection (a)(2), including the ex25 tent to which transportation security officers 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2381 IS

1 engage in screening beyond the screening pre2 scribed through relevant policies and training; 

3 (B) the need for TSA to update and revise 

4 procedures for screening breast milk and other 

5 liquids described in subsection (a)(2); 

6 (C) whether TSA effectively tracks pas7 senger complaints related to such screening to 

8 monitor trends and identify inconsistencies; 

9 (D) the practices of TSA with respect to 

10 communications and information sharing with 

11 passengers, air carriers, and airports relating to 

12 protocols for such screening; and 

13 (E) the policies of TSA regarding the 

14 screening of passengers with nursing products, 

15 including the extent to which such passengers 

16 are more likely to receive secondary screening; 

17 and 

18 (2) make recommendations for improving the 

19 practices of TSA relating to such screening. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual report of SaviCorp
(the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Serge Monros, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to SaviCorp and will be retained by SaviCorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: September 19, 2013 | By: /s/ SERGE MONROS                               
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------
|                         | Serge Monros                                       
|                         | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2009209EN.01001101.xml

| 4.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 209/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/11

---

Corrigendum to public holidays in 2009

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 14 of 21 January 2009
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 14 of 21 January 2009

2009/C 209/08

On page 6, table, first entry ‘Belgique/België’:

for:

‘... 25.12, 26.12’,

read:

‘... 25.12, 26.12, 27.12, 28.12, 29.12, 30.12, 31.12’.

---
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5205 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 12, 2018 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, as 

the ‘‘Sergeant Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

HR 5205 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT KENNETH ERIC BOSTIC POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, 

5 Nevada, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant 

6 Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Kenneth 

11 Eric Bostic Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2018. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 10/25/10 Page 1 of 7
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 10/25/10 Page 2 of 7
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 10/25/10 Page 3 of 7
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 10/25/10 Page 4 of 7
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 10/25/10 Page 5 of 7
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 10/25/10 Page 6 of 7
Case 4:10-cv-00467-RH-WCS Document 1 Filed 10/25/10 Page 7 of 7
0- , . . . , . . ,. .. . . . . . .. -.-.--- --..-...,-. _ . ---- ----.----- -"---dx 

j i:Sii\.<: SDNY "1 

1 fig (;l,!y$f<r 1 i l i 

I EI~~yg;tr.:.;e,~;,.~y F~I,;~D 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -A;..--.- 

IN RE: 

: MASTER i:11,E 

FOSAMAX PRODUCTS LIABII,ITY LITIGATION 

I I :06-MD-I 789 (JFK) 

This Document Relates 7b .4N ilctions 

ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE ON ORAL MOTION 

Upon the oral motion of William .I. Beausolcil, attorney for defendant Merck &: Co., Inc., and 

said sponsor attorney's declaration that applicant James M. Doran, Jr. is a member in good 

standing of the bar of the United States District Court for the MiddIe District of Tennessee; 

and that applicant's contact information is as follows: 

Applicant's Name: James M. Doran, Jr. 

Firm Namc: Waller Lansden Dortch & Davis 

Addrcss: Nashville City Center, 51 1 Union Strcet, Suite 2700 

CityIStatclZip: Nashville. Tenncssee 372 19 

TeicphoneIFax: (6 15) 850-8843/(615) 244-6804 

Email Address: jim.doran@,wallerlaw.com 

said applicant having requested admission pro hac vice to appcar for all purposes as counsel for 

Merck & Co., Inc. in the above entitled action: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that James M. Doran, Jr, is admitted to practice pro hac vice in the 

above captioned case in the United States District Court fbr the Southern District of New York. 

All attorneys appearing before this Court are suhject to the Local Rules of this Court, including 

thc Rulcs governing discipline of attomcys. If this action is assigned to thc Electronic Case 

Filing (ECF) system, counscl shall immediately apply for an ECF password at 

Case 1:07-cv-03465-JFK Document 4 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
2 

\v\\w.n~~sd.uscourisb~o~~. Counsel shall immediately forward the pro hac vice fee to the Clerk of 

the Court. 

Dated: June 212007 

New York, New York 

--- 

-united States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03465-JFK Document 4 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DlSTRICT OF TENNESSEE 

CERTlFlCATE OF GOOD STANDlNG 

1. KEITH THROCKMORTON. Clerk ofthe llnited Stalcs District Court for the 

Middle District of'l'enncssee. do herebq certilicd that .JAMES M. DOHAN was duly 

admitted to practice in said Court on April 10, 1970, and is in good standing as a member 

of thc bar ofsaid Court. 

Dated at Nashville. 'l'enncssee on May 29, 2007 

KI;I'TI~I THKOCKMORTON, CI,EIU -- Deputy CI 

Case 1:07-cv-03465-JFK Document 4 Filed 06/05/2007 Page 3 of 3