alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-4233

_____________________________

NICHOLAS MENO,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal – Original Jurisdiction.

January 26, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized 

motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________
2

Nicholas Meno, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 10, 2007, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute (“SwRI”): Cooperative Research Group on Integrated Investigation of Faulting in Carbonate Strata has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

                    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties to the venture are: Chevron Energy Technology Co., San Ramon, CA; ConocoPhillips Co., Houston, TX; ExxonMobil Upstream Research Co., Houston, TX; and Shell International Exploration & Production, Inc., Houston, TX. The general area of Cooperative Research Group on Integrated Investigation of Faulting in Carbonate Strata planned activity is to characterize the deformation features that develop in faulted carbonate rocks to provide analog information for understanding faulted carbonate hydrocarbon reservoirs. This                           ( print page 62871)                        investigation is being conducted in an area where faults serve as both barriers and conduits for groundwater movement. Characterization of the faulted field exposures will include stratigraphic, lithologic, structural, hydrologic and geomechanical investigations. Quantitative deformation analysis will be performed through a combination of field- and laboratory-based analysis.                

Membership in this research group remains open, and the participants intend to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership or planned activities.

Patricia A. Brink, 

Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 07-5566 Filed 11-06-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JOHN C. WILDS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00131-MP-WCS

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 16, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, which recommends that the decision of the Commissioner to deny Plaintiff's

application for disability and supplemental security income benefits be affirmed. After a

thorough review of the record, the Magistrate Judge concluded that “the findings of the

Administrative Law Judge were based upon substantial evidence in the record and correctly

followed the law.” Doc. 16 at 25. Plaintiff has not objected to the recommendation, and the

time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 16, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein.

2.. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is AFFIRMED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case 4:10-cv-00309-RH -WCS Document 6 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:10-cv-00309-RH -WCS Document 6 Filed 08/05/10 Page 2 of 6
Case 4:10-cv-00309-RH -WCS Document 6 Filed 08/05/10 Page 3 of 6
Case 4:10-cv-00309-RH -WCS Document 6 Filed 08/05/10 Page 4 of 6
Case 4:10-cv-00309-RH -WCS Document 6 Filed 08/05/10 Page 5 of 6
Case 4:10-cv-00309-RH -WCS Document 6 Filed 08/05/10 Page 6 of 6
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LOUIS ROBENSON,

 Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:09cv365/RV/MD

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

 Defendant.

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon plaintiff's filing a petition for injunction (doc. 1)

a supplemental affidavit in support, a memorandum of law/rules and a motion to proceed

in forma pauperis (doc. 1, 2 3 & 4). 

The purpose of preliminary injunctive relief is to preserve the status quo between

the parties and to prevent irreparable injury until the merits of the lawsuit itself can be

reviewed. Devose v. Herrington, 42 F.3d 470, 471 (8 Cir. 1994); All Care Nursing Service, th

Inc. v. Bethesda Memorial Hospital, 887 F.2d 1535, 1537 (11 Cir. 1989); United States th

v. State of Alabama, 791 F.2d 1450, 1457 n.9 (11 Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1085, th

107 S.Ct. 1287, 94 L.Ed.2d 144 (1987). This necessitates that the relief sought in the

motion be closely related to the conduct complained of in the actual complaint. Devose,

42 F.3d at 471; Penn v. San Juan Hosp., 528 F.2d 1181, 1185 (10 Cir. 1975). The th

allegations in the motion for injunctive relief suggest that plaintiff complains of constitutional

violations that arise under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He seeks temporary or preliminary relief,

although he has not yet filed a civil rights complaint. He will be required to file a proper

complaint before the court considers the allegations raised in his motion for temporary
Page 2 of 2

injunctive relief. In addition, because of plaintiff’s status as a “three-striker,” the court will

not rule upon plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis until he files his complaint.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk is directed to send plaintiff a section 1983 complaint form. This case

number should be written on the form.

2. Plaintiff shall fully and completely fill out and file the court form.

3. Plaintiff shall do the above within thirty (30) days from the date of the docketing

of this order. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that his motion be denied

and this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute and to comply with an order of the

court.

4. Ruling on plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred until receipt

of plaintiff’s complaint.

5. The clerk shall refer the physical file to chambers upon the receipt of plaintiff’s

complaint or the expiration of the time in which to file said complaint. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 27 day of August, 2009. th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 3:09cv365/RV/MD
#### IN RE DAIRY FARMS

No. 43.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 459.

Appeal of Milk Commission dismissed on motion of Dairy Farms for lack of substantial constitutional question 6 February 1980.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MARION J. ARNOLD, SR. and

PATRICIA B. ARNOLD,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv38/RS-MD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant/Counterclaimant,

vs.

MICHAEL ARNOLD,

Additional Counterclaim Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Stipulation And Request For Dismissal (Doc. 37).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

2. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on January 10, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of William Lyon Homes (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period endingDecember 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael D. Grubbs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company. 

 

/s/    MICHAEL D. GRUBBS                        

Michael D. Grubbs 

SeniorVice President, Chief Financial 

Officer and Treasurer 

February 18, 2003
# C_2011090EN.01000501.xml

| 22.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/5

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to which measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya apply

2011/C 90/05

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in the Annexes to Council Implementing Decision 2011/175/CFSP (1), implementing Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP, and in the Annex to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 272/2011 (2), implementing Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons and entities that appear in the above mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex IV to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 7 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| TEFS Coordination |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

TEFS Coordination

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 95.

1

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 32.

2

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILLIE FRED BAUCHAM, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00263-MP-WCS

MIKE MOCK, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 71, Motion for Attorney Fees by Jim

Watkins. On December 2, 2011, the Court denied defendant Watkins’s motion to

compel as moot. However, since the response to defendant Watkins’s request for

production was provided after the motion to compel was filed, the Court ordered plaintiff

to pay defendant Watkins’s reasonable expenses incurred in making the motion,

including attorney's fees, pursuant to Rule 37(a)(5)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. The plaintiff has no objection to the instant motion for attorney’s fees.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant Watkins’s motion for attorney fees is GRANTED.

2. The plaintiff is directed to pay defendant Watkins $195.00, pursuant to

Rule 37(a)(5)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2011. 

áBZtÜç eA ]ÉÇxá 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00263-MP-WCS Document 74 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 1
#### INSURANCE CO. v. INGRAM, COMR. OF INSURANCE

No. 103 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 552.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1977.
# C_2009194EN.01000801.xml

| 18.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 August 2009

2009/C 194/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4072 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4435 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86290 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2880 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5212 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7265 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,785 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,07 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7000 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1980 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2245 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1222 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7208 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5621 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9068 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1155 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0434 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 771,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5338 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6203 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3027 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 119,06 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9850 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,076 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,4800 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,950 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6396 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3075 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,8120 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4072

JPY

Japanese yen

132,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4435

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86290

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2880

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5212

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7265

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,785

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,07

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7000

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1980

RON

Romanian leu

4,2245

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1222

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7208

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5621

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9068

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1155

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0434

KRW

South Korean won

1 771,04

ZAR

South African rand

11,5338

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6203

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3027

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 119,06

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9850

PHP

Philippine peso

68,076

RUB

Russian rouble

45,4800

THB

Thai baht

47,950

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6396

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3075

INR

Indian rupee

68,8120

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1756

SHANNON BRIDGET MURPHY, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

CIRCUIT COURT OF CABELL COUNTY, West Virginia, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, 

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00587) 

Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008 

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Shannon Bridget Murphy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Shannon Bridget Murphy appeals the district court’s 

order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

dismissing this civil action for want of subject matter 

jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Murphy v. Circuit Court, No. 3:07-cv00587 (S.D.W. Va. June 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SANDRA MARIE MOORE,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv279/RV/EMT

ROY LYNN,

Defendant.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated October 7, 2010 (Doc. 17). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed

objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. This case is DISMISSED and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of October, 2010.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 
 
 
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**  **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**  **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of The Blackhawk Fund, a Nevada corporation
        (the Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Steve Bonenberger, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of
        the
        Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
   Dated:
        March 26, 2008
  /s/
        Steve
        Bonenberger
 
 Steve
        Bonenberger, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63915-63916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting of the Sleep Disorders Research Advisory Board.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: Sleep Disorders Research Advisory Board.
    Date: December 4, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To discuss sleep research, education priorities, and 
programs.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, 31 Center 
Drive, 6C Room 6, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Michael J. Twery, PhD, Director, National Center 
on Sleep Disorders Research, Division of Lung Diseases, National 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 
6701 Rockledge Drive, Suite 10038, Bethesda, MD 20892-7952, 301-435-
0199, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#24505341565d49644a4c48464d0a4a4d4c0a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="73070416010a1e331d1b1f111a5d1d1a1b5d141c05">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/meetings/index.htm, where an agenda 
and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.


[[Page 63916]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS).

    Dated: November 2, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5620 Filed 11-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>