alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Cases No. 4:10cr70-RH/CAS and 4:12cv424-RH/CAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASES NO. 4:10cr70-RH/CAS

 4:12cv424-RH/CAS

MARCUS KNIGHT,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER DENYING THE § 2255 MOTION

The defendant has moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for relief from his 

judgment of conviction. The motion is before the court on the magistrate judge’s 

report and recommendation, ECF No. 155. No objections have been filed. This 

order accepts the report and recommendation and adopts it as the court’s opinion.

A defendant may appeal the denial of a § 2255 motion only if the district 

court or court of appeals issues a certificate of appealability. Under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability may issue “only if the applicant has 

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 

(2000); Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n.4 (1983); see also Williams v. 

Case 4:10-cr-00070-RH-CAS Document 163 Filed 05/09/15 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Cases No. 4:10cr70-RH/CAS and 4:12cv424-RH/CAS

Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 402-13 (2000) (setting out the standards applicable to a 

§ 2254 petition on the merits). As the Court said in Slack:

To obtain a COA under § 2253(c), a habeas prisoner must make a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a 

demonstration that, under Barefoot, includes showing that reasonable 

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the 

petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the 

issues presented were “adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed 

further.” 

529 U.S. at 483-84 (quoting Barefoot, 463 U.S. at 893 n.4). Further, in order to 

obtain a certificate of appealability when dismissal is based on procedural grounds, 

a petitioner must show, “at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable

whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and 

that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct 

in its procedural ruling.” Id. at 484. 

The defendant has not made the required showing. This order thus denies a 

certificate of appealability. 

For these reasons,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The clerk must enter a judgment stating, “The defendant’s motion for 

Case 4:10-cr-00070-RH-CAS Document 163 Filed 05/09/15 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Cases No. 4:10cr70-RH/CAS and 4:12cv424-RH/CAS

relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED.

2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

SO ORDERED on May 9, 2015.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cr-00070-RH-CAS Document 163 Filed 05/09/15 Page 3 of 3
# C_2009311EN.01001202.xml

| 19.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/12

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5694 — DCC Energy/Shell Direct Austria)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 311/03

On 15 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5694. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5694. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SCHONE DEES,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cv305-SPM/WCS

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT 

OF JUVENILE JUSTICE,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss. 

Doc. 2. Plaintiff filed a response (doc. 8) agreeing that additional allegations

should be added to the complaint. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The motion to dismiss (doc. 2) is granted without prejudice to

Plaintiff’s opportunity to amend.

2. Plaintiff shall have up to and including September 10, 2010, to file

the amended complaint.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of August, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ CHRISTOPHER SCOTT DANGIM, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. FNU LNU, USA Law Enforcement; FNU LNU, Rio Rancho Po lice; FNU LNU, Sandoval County Sh erriffs; FNU LNU, Docs and Mental Health; FNU SALAZAR, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. No. 17-2156 (D.C. No. 1:16-CV-00812-JB-SCY) (D. N.M.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before HARTZ , HOLMES , and BACHARACH , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Christopher Scott Dangim appeals from th e district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his claims agains t the United States, the court’ s dismissal without prejudice of his claims against state officers under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the court’s decision to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdic tion over his remaining state-law claims.

* After examining the briefs and appella te record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not ma terially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctr ines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cite d, however, for its persuasi ve value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### January 30, 2018
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2

2 We AFFIRM the judgment below. The district court bent over backwards to discern claims in Mr. Dangim’s pleadings and patiently explaine d why the claims under federal law must fail. Mr. Dangim’s brief in this court points to no errors by the district court. In addition, the district court acted well within its disc retion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims. We DENY Mr. Dangim’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

.
Entered for the Court

Harris L Hartz Circuit Judge
#### STATE v. CAMPBELL

No. 14.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 493.

State’s petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 31 July 1972.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA,

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MWASI SONGAMBELE,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10cv241-RH-WCS

GODFREY O. ONUGHA, D.M.D

and W.T. TAYLOR

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

Undersigned counsel moves the Court for permission to withdraw Eubanks, Barrett,

Fasig & Brooks as counsel for Plaintiff in this matter and for an order relieving counsel from

further responsibility for this matter. As grounds, the undersigned would show:

1. Donald Freeman, who has been representing Plaintiff in this case, has withdrawn

from the firm and is unable to continue to represent Plaintiff.

2. Plaintiff has failed to cooperate with counsel in that she does not keep scheduled

telephone appointments and has refused to take steps necessary to allow counsel to communicate

with her by email, despite numerous requests.

3. Plaintiff has informed the firm that she has retained new counsel to represent her.

4. Undersigned counsel has discussed this matter with Kathy Maus, Esquire, counsel

for Defendant, Godfrey O. Onugha, D.M.D., and Paul Alan Sprowls, Esquire, counsel for

Defendant W.T. Taylor, and neither objects to entry of an order discharging Eubanks, Barrett,

Fasig & Brooks from further responsibility in this matter. Ms. Maus, by agreeing to

Case 4:10-cv-00241-RH -WCS Document 35 Filed 11/30/10 Page 1 of 2
2

undersigned’s withdrawal in no way agrees to extend any dates set for discovery, mediation or

other previously scheduled events in this matter.

WHEREFORE undersigned requests that the Court enter an order discharging Eubanks,

Barrett, Fasig & Brooks as attorneys for Plaintiff in this matter.

Respectfully submitted this 30th day of November, 2010.

EUBANKS BARRETT FASIG

& BROOKS

/S/ R. Vinson Barrett

R. VINSON BARRETT (FBN 0217255)

3360 Capital Circle, N.E., Suite C

Tallahassee, Florida 32308

(850) 224-3310 Telephone

(850) 224-3433 Fax

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that true and correct copies of the foregoing were provided via

ECM/ECF this 30th day of November 2010 to:

Kathy J. Maus Paul Alan Sprowls

Ryan M. Garrett United States Attorney’s Office

Butler Pappas Weihmuller 111 S. Adams St.

Katz Craig, LLP Tallahassee, FL 32301

3600 Maclay Boulevard, Suite 101 alan.sprowls@usdoj.gov

Tallahassee, FL 32312

kmaus@butlerpappas.com

rgarrett@butlerpappas.com

Case 4:10-cv-00241-RH -WCS Document 35 Filed 11/30/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23

To the Board of Directors
Echelon International Corporation:


     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Forms S-8 (No. 333-18171), (No. 333-18175), (No. 333-18177) and (No. 333-18179),
of Echelon International Corporation of our reports dated March 10, 1998,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Echelon International Corporation
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the 
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, and all related 
schedules, which reports appear in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form
10-K of Echelon International Corporation.


                                        KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


St. Petersburg, FL
March 30, 1998
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62865]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Industrial Macromolecular Crystallography 
Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 21, 2007, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301, et seq. (``the Act''), Industrial Macromolecular 
Crystallography Association (``IMCA'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research 
& Development, LLC, Raritan, NJ has been added as a party to this 
venture; 3-Dimensional Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Exton, PA has withdrawn 
as a party to this venture; and Pfizer Global Research and Development 
has changed its principal place of business to Groton, CT.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and IMCA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 23, 1990, IMCA filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
December 3, 1990 (55 FR 49952).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on November 17, 
2003. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on December 12, 2003 (68 FR 69422).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-5561 Filed 11-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# CA2009177EN.01000501.xml

| 30.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 177/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 177/5

---

RESERVE LISTS
   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

1

OPEN COMPETITIONS

OPEN COMPETITIONS

Laboratory assistants (AST 1) in the field of research and nuclear energy

(2009/C 177 A/04)

EPSO/AST/58/08 — MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

| BOFFOLI | Salvatore |
| --- | --- |
| BONOMO | Cristian |
| BOUDAUD | Denis |
| CARLSSON | Robert Nils |
| CRISTEA | Viorel |
| FITENI | Ruben |
| FORMOSO | Jean-Luc |
| GRECIUSCA | Stefan |
| HAUER | Waldemar |
| KELLER | Zsolt |
| KOVALCIKAS | Dainius |
| LAMBROU | Petros |
| LIPOVSKY | Ivan |
| LONGIN | Kristof |
| MANIACI | Federico |
| MANNI | Massimo |
| PARAIAN | Ioan |
| PATSIALA | Eirini |
| PUPIK | Nikola |
| QUARTO | Riccardo |
| RENAUDIN | Eric |
| ROBU | Adrian |
| TANARRO | Jorge |
| TIMOSSI | Paolo |
| VALLINO | Massimo |
| VAN NOYEN | Mark |
| WEIS | Milan |

BOFFOLI

Salvatore

BONOMO

Cristian

BOUDAUD

Denis

CARLSSON

Robert Nils

CRISTEA

Viorel

FITENI

Ruben

FORMOSO

Jean-Luc

GRECIUSCA

Stefan

HAUER

Waldemar

KELLER

Zsolt

KOVALCIKAS

Dainius

LAMBROU

Petros

LIPOVSKY

Ivan

LONGIN

Kristof

MANIACI

Federico

MANNI

Massimo

PARAIAN

Ioan

PATSIALA

Eirini

PUPIK

Nikola

QUARTO

Riccardo

RENAUDIN

Eric

ROBU

Adrian

TANARRO

Jorge

TIMOSSI

Paolo

VALLINO

Massimo

VAN NOYEN

Mark

WEIS

Milan

EPSO/AST/59/08 — LABORATORY TECHNICAL SUPPORT

Merit Group 1

| ANISIM | Iuliana |
| --- | --- |
| BERGUA | Maria |
| BONATO | Christian |
| BRUSTIO | Roberta |
| DA COSTA BARATA | Ricardo |
| ERNESTI | Andrew |
| MARINO | Adriana |
| PAPERINI | Gianni |
| REQUEJO CORONADO | Cristina |
| TEMPESTA | Stéphane |
| TZVETKOV | Iskren |
| VERMOREL | Emmanuel |

ANISIM

Iuliana

BERGUA

Maria

BONATO

Christian

BRUSTIO

Roberta

DA COSTA BARATA

Ricardo

ERNESTI

Andrew

MARINO

Adriana

PAPERINI

Gianni

REQUEJO CORONADO

Cristina

TEMPESTA

Stéphane

TZVETKOV

Iskren

VERMOREL

Emmanuel

Merit Group 2

| ABAD MIER | Jose Manuel |
| --- | --- |
| BALDI | Annamaria |
| GOBLET | Kevin |
| GUELI | Fabio |
| GUILLAUME | Fabrice |
| LEONARDI | Giuseppe Maria |
| MARBOT | Emmanuel Charles Rene |
| SEGUY | Anne |

ABAD MIER

Jose Manuel

BALDI

Annamaria

GOBLET

Kevin

GUELI

Fabio

GUILLAUME

Fabrice

LEONARDI

Giuseppe Maria

MARBOT

Emmanuel Charles Rene

SEGUY

Anne

Merit Group 3

| BOF | Giuseppe |
| --- | --- |
| FARFALETTI CASALI | Arianna Cristiana |
| GERARDI | Giovanni |
| GIACOMELLI | Giovanni |
| JOURNEE | Olivier |
| KOEV | Emil |
| MOCANU | Gabriela |
| SOCKEEL | Valérie |
| SONDAG | Michael |
| TAMBORINI | Anita |

BOF

Giuseppe

FARFALETTI CASALI

Arianna Cristiana

GERARDI

Giovanni

GIACOMELLI

Giovanni

JOURNEE

Olivier

KOEV

Emil

MOCANU

Gabriela

SOCKEEL

Valérie

SONDAG

Michael

TAMBORINI

Anita

The reserve list will be valid until 31 December 2010 and may be extended.

31 December 2010

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

INDEPENDENT FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Independent Film Development Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth Eade, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 20, 2010



/s/ Kenneth G. Eade

Kenneth G. Eade

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.01


SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT  
WITH ANIRUDH DEVGAN
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT (this “Second Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (as defined below) is made and entered into effective as of the last date on the signature page hereto by and between Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) and ANIRUDH DEVGAN (“Executive”).  
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement effective March 16, 2015 and First Amendment to Employment Agreement (the “First Amendment”) effective November 16, 2017 (as amended by the First Amendment, the “Employment Agreement”) pursuant to which Executive is employed by the Company; 
WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect changes to certain severance provisions; and 
WHEREAS, all terms capitalized but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Employment Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1.Effective as of the date hereof, the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
a.    The Executive’s Base Salary provided pursuant to section 2.1 of the Employment Agreement shall be Five Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($550,000) per year.
b.    The Executive’s annual Target Bonus provided pursuant to section 2.2 of the Employment Agreement shall be one hundred fifteen percent (115%) of Executive’s Base Salary, and shall continue to be governed by the terms of the Bonus Plan and any guidelines thereunder.
c.    Section 4.5(a)(2) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the words and figures “fifty percent (50%)” with “57.5%.”
d.    Clause 6(a)(i) of the form of Executive Transition and Release Agreement attached as Exhibit A to the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by replacing the figure “100%” with the figure “115%”.


-1-





2.    Each of the parties hereto hereby confirms that the Employment Agreement (as amended by the First Amendment), except as expressly amended by this Second Amendment, remains in full force and effect.
3.    This Second Amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.
4.    This Second Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflicts of laws principles. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this SECOND AMENDMENT on the dates set forth below, to be effective as set forth above.
	
						
	CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, INC.
	 
	EXECUTIVE

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Christina Jones
	 
	/s/ Anirudh Devgan     

	Name:
	Christina Jones
	 
	Anirudh Devgan

	Title:
	Senior Vice President
Global Human Resources
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Date:
	March 31, 2020
	 
	Date:
	March 31, 2020
	 






-2-
Case 7:07-cv-03508-MDF Document 3 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2010001EN.01000601.xml

| 5.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 January 2010

2010/C 1/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4389 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4415 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89140 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1930 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4873 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2290 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,285 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,85 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1030 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2253 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1411 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5885 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4953 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1608 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9764 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0126 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 662,37 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5618 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8238 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2936 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 542,61 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8887 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,100 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,1600 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,779 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4917 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6664 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,6210 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4389

JPY

Japanese yen

133,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4415

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89140

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1930

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4873

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2290

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,285

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,85

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1030

RON

Romanian leu

4,2253

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1411

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5885

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4953

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1608

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9764

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0126

KRW

South Korean won

1 662,37

ZAR

South African rand

10,5618

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8238

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2936

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 542,61

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8887

PHP

Philippine peso

66,100

RUB

Russian rouble

43,1600

THB

Thai baht

47,779

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4917

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6664

INR

Indian rupee

66,6210

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 19-13729

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 4:18-cr-00262-RSB-CLR-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

HOSEA SCOTT, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Georgia

________________________

(September 2, 2020)

Before JORDAN, GRANT, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 19-13729 Date Filed: 09/02/2020 Page: 1 of 2
2

Paul Calhoun, appointed counsel for Hosea Scott in this direct criminal 

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and 

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Scott, in turn, 

has filed a motion to discharge Calhoun as counsel. Our independent review of the 

entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is 

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable 

issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, Scott’s motion to 

discharge counsel is DENIED AS MOOT, and Scott’s conviction and sentence 

are AFFIRMED.

Case: 19-13729 Date Filed: 09/02/2020 Page: 2 of 2