alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010066EN.01001001.xml

| 17.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5712 — Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings/Mitsubishi Rayon Co)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 66/02

On 25 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5712. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5712. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 20-5176 September Term, 2020

1:17-cv-02647-TJK

Filed On: April 23, 2021

Karen Baylor,

Appellant

v.

Jerome Powell, Chairman of the Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve System,

Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Tatel, Pillard, and Walker, Circuit Judges

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s April 29, 2020 order

granting summary judgment to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

(“the Board”) be affirmed.

The district court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of the Board

on appellant’s claims of discriminatory nonselection and retaliation. The Board

provided legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for not selecting appellant, and appellant

did not produce sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find that those reasons were

pretext and that the Board instead intentionally discriminated against her on the basis of

race. See Brady v. Office of Sergeant at Arms, 520 F.3d 490, 493–94 (D.C. Cir. 2008). 

Further, appellant has not produced sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find that

the Board’s termination of appellant’s access to its PeopleClick system was a materially

adverse employment action. See Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White, 548 U.S.

53, 67–68 (2006).

Appellant argues that, at this stage in the proceeding, she was not required to

establish a prima facie case of retaliation. To be sure, once the Board articulated its

legitimate nonretaliatory reason for terminating appellant’s access, the relevant inquiry
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 20-5176 September Term, 2020

turned on “the ultimate issue of retaliation vel non.” See Cruz v. McAleenan, 931 F.3d

1186, 1194 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). However, this court has

explained that it “can resolve that question in favor of the employer based either upon

the employee’s failure to rebut its explanation or upon the employee’s failure to prove

an element of her case—here that her employer took a materially adverse action

against her.” Taylor v. Solis, 571 F.3d 1313, 1320 n.* (D.C. Cir. 2009).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the

resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See

Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk

Page 2
[Cite as Geauga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Snavely, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2017-Ohio-4130.] 

GEAUGA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION. v. SNAVELY. 

[Cite as Geauga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Snavely, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 

2017-Ohio-4130.] 

(No. 2016-0854—Submitted June 2, 2017—Decided June 6, 2017.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Carly L. Snavely, Attorney 

Registration No. 0081569, last known business address in Chagrin Falls, Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 22, 2016, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent 

from the practice of law for a period of two years, with the final 18 months stayed 

on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and 

with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the State of Ohio. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be 

made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2). 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and O’DONNELL, KENNEDY, FRENCH, O’NEILL, FISCHER,

and DEWINE, JJ., concur. 

________________________
# C_2009300EN.01000201.xml

| 10.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/2

---

New national sides of euro coins intended for circulation

2009/C 300/02

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 EURO CENT | 2 EURO CENT | 5 EURO CENT | 10 EURO CENT |
| | | | |
| 20 EURO CENT | 50 EURO CENT | 1 EURO | 2 EURO |

Image

Image

Image

Image

1 EURO CENT

2 EURO CENT

5 EURO CENT

10 EURO CENT

Image

Image

Image

Image

20 EURO CENT

50 EURO CENT

1 EURO

2 EURO

New national sides of euro coins intended for circulation and issued by Spain

New national sides of euro coins intended for circulation and issued by Spain

Euro coins intended for circulation are legal tender throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and professionals who handle the coins, the Commission publishes descriptions of the designs of all coins (1).

1

In order to comply with the common guidelines on the design of the national sides (2), Spain has issued new designs of the national sides of Spanish euro coins to be produced from 2010. Coins from previous years featuring the old Spanish national side will remain valid.

2

Issuing country: Spain

Date of issue: From January 2010

Description of the designs:

1 EURO CENT — 2 EURO CENT — 5 EURO CENT

The central part of the coin features the Cathedral of Saint James of Compostela. At the top, between the towers, is the year. On the left, the name of the issuing country appears in an arc: ‘ESPAÑA’. The mintmark appears top right.

The twelve stars of the European flag encircle the design.

10 EURO CENT — 20 EURO CENT — 50 EURO CENT

The central part of the coin features, on the right, a portrait of Miguel de Cervantes. On the left, the inscription ‘Cervantes’ forms an arc above a writer’s quill, below which is the mint mark. The year ‘2010’ is indicated at the bottom in the middle.

The twelve stars of the European flag encircle the design.

1 EURO — 2 EURO

The central part of the coin features a portrait of HM King Juan Carlos I. The name of the issuing country, ‘ESPAÑA’, forms an arc on the left. The mintmark appears on the right and the year appears at the bottom on the left.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Image

Image

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1, for the national sides of all the euro coins issued in 2002; OJ C 225, 19.9.2006, p. 7; OJ C 254, 20.10.2006, p. 6; OJ C 248, 23.10.2007, p. 8.

1

(2)  See Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52) corroborated by the Conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009, on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation.

2

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HUNG NG,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv268-RH/WCS

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. et al.,

Respondents.

___________________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION AS MOOT

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 18. No objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The petition is dismissed as

moot.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on September 15, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Each of the
undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of
title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of East Fork
Biodiesel, LLC (the Company), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of
the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this
statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

|                         |     |                           
|------------------------ | --- | --------------------------
|Date:
 February 17, 2009 | By: | /s/Chris L.
 Daniel       
|                         |     |                           
|                         |     | Chris L.
 Daniel          
|                         |     | Chief
 Executive Officer  
|                         |     |                           
|Date:
 February 17, 2009 | By: | /s/ Jack W.
 Limbaugh, Jr.
|                         |     |                           
|                         |     | Jack W.
 Limbaugh, Jr.    
|                         |     | Treasurer                 

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2220 

To modify the exemption for trade secrets and commercial or financial 

information in the Freedom of Information Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. CORNYN, and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To modify the exemption for trade secrets and commercial 

or financial information in the Freedom of Information 

Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Open and Responsive 

5 Government Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2220 IS

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 

2 ACT. 

3 Section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly 

4 known as the ‘‘Freedom of Information Act’’) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) in subsection (b)(4), by inserting before the 

7 semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘, provided that 

8 the term ‘confidential’ means information that, if 

9 disclosed, would likely cause substantial harm to the 

10 competitive position of the person from whom the in11 formation was obtained’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (d)— 

13 (A) by striking ‘‘This section does not au14 thorize withholding of information’’ and insert15 ing ‘‘This section— 

16 ‘‘(1) does not authorize the withholding of in17 formation’’; 

18 (B) in paragraph (1), as so designated, by 

19 striking ‘‘. This section is not authority to with20 hold information from Congress.’’ and inserting 

21 a semicolon; and 

22 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

23 ‘‘(2) does not authorize the withholding of a 

24 portion of an otherwise responsive record on the 

25 basis that the portion is non-responsive; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2220 IS

1 ‘‘(3) is not authority to withhold information 

2 from Congress.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2009251EN.01000201.xml

| 21.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 October 2009

2009/C 251/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4971 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4436 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,91170 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3690 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5121 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3225 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,718 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 264,59 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7078 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1560 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2925 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1757 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6121 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5443 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,6025 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9835 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0814 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 745,29 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,9606 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2200 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2230 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 065,91 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0370 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,880 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,6390 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,018 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6012 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,2153 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,0390 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4971

JPY

Japanese yen

135,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4436

GBP

Pound sterling

0,91170

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3690

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5121

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3225

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,718

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

264,59

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7078

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1560

RON

Romanian leu

4,2925

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1757

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6121

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5443

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,6025

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9835

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0814

KRW

South Korean won

1 745,29

ZAR

South African rand

10,9606

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2200

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2230

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 065,91

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0370

PHP

Philippine peso

69,880

RUB

Russian rouble

43,6390

THB

Thai baht

50,018

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6012

MXN

Mexican peso

19,2153

INR

Indian rupee

69,0390

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHARLES ALLEN, JR.,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5:09cv287/MCR/CJK

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

_______________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated June 8, 2012 (doc. 53). The petitioner has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 53) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 30), challenging the

convictions and sentences in State of Florida v. Charles Allen, Jr., in the Circuit Court for

Bay County, Florida, Case Nos. 08-1168, 08-1169 and 08-1170, is DENIED.

Case 5:09-cv-00287-MCR-CJK Document 55 Filed 08/30/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of August, 2012.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case No: 5:09cv287/MCR/CJK

Case 5:09-cv-00287-MCR-CJK Document 55 Filed 08/30/12 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.9



 Exhibit 10.9 

AMENDMENT NO. ONE 
 TO THE

 KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION 

PENSION EQUALIZATION PLAN 

THIS AMENDMENT made and executed the 27th day of August, 2014, by Kewaunee Scientific Corporation. (the “Corporation”); 

W I T N E S S E T H 

WHEREAS, the Corporation has entered into the Kewaunee Scientific Corporation Pension Equalization Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit
of a select group of management or highly compensated employees of the Corporation; and 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation has reserved in
Section 6.1 the right to amend the Plan from time to time; and 
 WHEREAS, the Corporation now desires to amend the Plan in certain
respects. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows, effective as of June 26, 2013: 

Section 5.3 of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

5.3 Controlling Law. The Plan shall be construed and enforced according to the laws of the State of North Carolina to
the extent not preempted or superseded by federal law, and the Plan shall be interpreted in a manner consistent with the maintenance of its status as a “top-hat plan” for purposes of ERISA and consistent with satisfying the requirements of
Code §409A. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused the Amendment to be properly executed on the 27th day of August, 2014.

  

			
	KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ D. Michael Parker

		
	Title:	 	 Senior Vice President, Finance
# C_2009029EN.01000402.xml

| 5.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5398 — Hutchison/Evergreen)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 29/03)

On 17 December 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5398. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32008M5398. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Exhibit 10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 
  

	TO:	Dana L. Dahlgren 

  

	RE:	EXTENSION OF CHANGE OF CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

 Pursuant to Section 1(b) of
your Change of Control Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of December 4, 2008, the term of the Agreement, as stated in Section 1(b) thereof, is hereby extended so that the Agreement, as extended, will end on
November 12, 2017. 
 In all other respects, the Agreement is reaffirmed and remains unchanged. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension Agreement, pursuant to authorization from the Board of Directors of the Company, is executed in the
Company’s name and on its behalf as of the day and year shown herein. 
 Date: August 27, 2014 

 

			
	KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ D. Michael Parker

		 	D. Michael Parker
	Its:	 	Senior Vice President, Finance
		 	Treasurer, Secretary
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JUAN CARLOS CANACA

- RAUDALES,

AKA Juan C. Canaca,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 19

- 10350

D.C. No.

4:19

- cr

- 00220

- DCB

- LCK

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 8, 2020 * *

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Juan Carlos Canaca

- Raudales appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty

- plea conviction and 46

- month sentence for illegal reentry , in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326

. Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738

(1967), Canaca

- Raudales ’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 10350

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Canaca

- Raudales the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No

pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Canaca

- Raudales waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United

States v. Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 986

- 88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss

the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 10.2 - FORM OF EXTENSION OF CLOSING DATE

                             EXTENSION OF CLOSING DATE

Pursuant to Section 8.1 of that Share Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement") dated
September 1, 2014 by and among Empire Global Corp and World Host Financiers
Limited (the "Parties").

The Parties hereby mutually agree to extend the Closing Date to:

September 30, 2014

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Extension of
Closing Date as of September 1, 2014.

EMPIRE GLOBAL CORP.




By:
   -----------------------------------
    Michele Ciavarella
    Chairman and CEO
    Empire Global Corp.

And


THE SELLERS




By:
   -----------------------------------
    World Hosts Financiers Limited,
    represented by Alliance Trust Company Limited
    Director