alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Squire Andrews, plaintiff in error, *vs.*The Mayor and Council of Atlanta, defendant in error.

(By two judges.) — 1. A policeman, sworn in by the Mayor of Atlanta, and performing the duties of policeman, though he may not have been elected as prescribed by the Act of *Incorporation,*is an officer *de facto.*

2. Where a person is presented, under the city ordinances, for obstructing such an officer in the discharge of his duties, and convicted, and the evidence on the part of the prosecution fully sustained the conviction, this Court will not, as a general rule, interfere. 12th March, 1872.

Municipal Corporations. Officers *defacto.*Before Judge Hopkins. Fulton Superior Court. April Term, 1871.

Andrews was charged before the Mayor and Council of Atlanta “with interfering with an officer on the 27th day of June, 1871.” What he did is unnecessary; suffice it to say there was sufficient evidence of interference to support a judg*155ment of guilty. Belcher was the man interfered with. It was admitted that Belcher was only policeman for Schofield’s rolling-mill yard, and kept there by Schofield to keep peace and order; that he was selected, employed and paid by Schofield, but sworn in by the Mayor of Atlanta, but was never elected as a policeman of Atlanta by the Mayor and Council by ballot or otherwise as the city law requires. He was undertaking to remove from the yard a person whom Schofield ordered off aud who refused to go. It seems to have been conceded that said mill was in the city. Andrew’s counsel insisted that he was not guilty, because Belcher was not an officer of the city; that there was no *charge*of interfering with Belcher *“while in discharge of his lawful duty,”*and that the evidence was too weak for conviction. He was convicted and sentenced. A *certiorari*complaining that said conviction was wrong, for the reasons above suggested, was refused. That refusal is assigned as error.

Thrasher & Thrasher, for plaintiff in error.

*W.*T. Newman, City Attorney, for defendant.

Belcher was *defacto*officer; 7 John’s R., 549; 5 Ga. R., 244; 30th, 426.

Montgomery, Judge.

Nothing need be added to the judgment in this case as pronounced from the bench. (See head notes.)

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2010046EN.01000502.xml

| 24.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 46/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 46/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5749 — Glencore/Chemoil Energy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 46/04

On 18 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5749. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5749. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Knology, Inc. 

West Point, Georgia 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statement No. 333-136566 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement No. 333-89179 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-153213, 333-136570, 333-127113, 333-103248 and 333-34540 onForm S-8 of Knology, Inc. of our reports dated March 13, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Knology, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 13, 2009
# C_2009267EN.01000601.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/6

---

Election of a President of a Chamber

2009/C 267/11

On 7 October 2009, following the resignation of President of the Chamber Ms Tiili and in accordance with Articles 7(3) and 15 of the Rules of Procedure, the Court of First Instance elected Ms Wiszniewska-Białecka President of the First Chamber composed of five Judges, for the period from 7 October 2009 to 31 August 2010.

---
Exhibit 10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
  

	TO:	Kurt P. Rindoks 

  

	RE:	EXTENSION OF CHANGE OF CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

 Pursuant to Section 1(b) of
your Change of Control Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of December 4, 2008, the term of the Agreement, as stated in Section 1(b) thereof, is hereby extended so that the Agreement, as extended, will end on
November 12, 2017. 
 In all other respects, the Agreement is reaffirmed and remains unchanged. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension Agreement, pursuant to authorization from the Board of Directors of the Company, is executed in the
Company’s name and on its behalf as of the day and year shown herein. 
 Date: August 27, 2014 

 

			
	KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ D. Michael Parker

		 	D. Michael Parker
	Its:	 	Senior Vice President, Finance
		 	Treasurer, Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 27 (Friday, February 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 6224]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Inland Waterways Users Board

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the forthcoming meeting.
    Name of Committee: Inland Waterways Users Board (Board).
    Date: March 14, 2007.
    Location: New Orleans Marriott at the Convention Center Hotel, 859 
Convention Center Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130, (504-613-
2890).
    Time: Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. and the meeting is 
scheduled to adjourn at 1 p.m.
    Agenda: The Board will consider its project investment priorities 
for the next fiscal year. The Board will also hear briefings on the 
status of both the funding for inland navigation projects and studies, 
and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund, and be provided updates of various 
inland waterways projects.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark R. Pointon, Headquarters, 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW-CO, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20314-1000; Ph: 202-761-4258.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Any 
interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with 
the committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-584 Filed 2-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:09cv395/RV/EMT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

On August 18 and 19, 2010, Plaintiff Arch Insurance Company (“Arch”) filed motions to

compel discovery directed to Defendant United States of America (“the United States”) and

Defendant Avenge, Inc. (“Avenge”) (Docs. 84, 85, respectively).1 Now before the court is a notice

filed by Arch and an attached, proposed, agreed-upon order, which notice and order indicate that the

matters raised in Arch’s motions to compel have been resolved by agreement or by compliance (see

Doc. 94 & Attach.). Arch also notes that the agreement and compliance render moot a motion to

compel directed to Avenge, filed June 30, 2010 (Doc. 74), and, apparently, a motion to compel

directed to the United States, also filed on June 30, 2010 (Doc. 73). Arch further indicates it wishes

to withdraw the motions to compel (or more specifically, Docs. 74, 83, 84, and 85), without

prejudice to refiling if such refiling becomes necessary (Doc. 94 & Attach.).2

 The court notes,

however, that the district court previously denied, as moot, the motions to compel filed by Arch on

June 30, 2010 (see Doc. 79 (denying, in relevant part, Docs. 73, 74, on July 6, 2010)); thus, the

undersigned need not do the same here.

1

 The motion directed to Avenge is an amended motion to compel (see Doc. 85), which motion rendered moot

the motion to compel directed to Avenge filed the previous day (Doc. 83). Thus, the clerk properly terminated the

earlier-filed motion (Doc. 83). 

2

 Although Arch does not specifically mention the earlier motion to compel directed to the United States (Doc.

73), this appears to be an oversight. 
Page 2 of 2

Thus, the court, having considered the agreements made by counsel, which agreements (or

compliance) have rendered moot the issues raised by Arch in the motions to compel, hereby

ORDERS as follows:

1. On or before SEPTEMBER 20, 2010, Avenge shall provide supplemental responses

to Requests 60–103 to the Request for Admission propounded by Arch.

2. Arch’s Amended Motion to Compel directed to Avenge (Doc. 85) is DENIED, as

moot and without prejudice.

3. Arch’s Motion to Compel directed to the United States (Doc. 84) is DENIED, as

moot and without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of September 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No.: 3:09cv395/RV/EMT
Presidential Documents

72061 

Federal Register 

Vol. 70, No. 229 

Wednesday, November 30, 2005 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 7965 of November 22, 2005 

National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month, 2005 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During National Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month, we renew 

our efforts to educate all Americans about the tragic consequences of impaired 

driving and encourage all Americans to drive responsibly. 

Every year, too many of our citizens get behind the wheel of an automobile 

after drinking alcohol or using drugs. This puts drivers, passengers, and 

others on the road at risk. Last year alone, drunk driving killed more than 

16,000 people and accounted for more than 30 percent of all motor vehicle 

deaths. 

My Administration remains committed to saving lives and preventing injuries 

resulting from drunk and drugged driving. The Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration oversees the ‘‘You 

Drink & Drive. You Lose.’’ program, which educates our citizens about 

the dangers of driving under the influence. This campaign also encourages 

lifesaving measures to help keep impaired drivers off the road—including 

sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, and prosecution of those who break 

the law. To protect our Nation’s young people and deter underage drinking, 

the Helping America’s Youth initiative, led by First Lady Laura Bush, is 

promoting positive youth development and educating our children about 

the dangers associated with alcohol and drug use. With the help of parents, 

educators, and faith-based and community organizations, this initiative teaches our children to avoid alcohol and drug use, make healthy choices, and 

build lives of purpose. 

Keeping drunk and drugged drivers off the road is vital for the safety 

of our loved ones and fellow citizens. All Americans can encourage responsible actions and work to ensure that those around them do not operate 

a vehicle while under the influence. When law enforcement, communities, 

and individuals unite against impaired driving, lives are saved and our 

Nation’s roadways are made safer for everyone. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim December 2005 as National 

Drunk and Drugged Driving Prevention Month. I encourage all Americans 

to help keep our Nation’s roadways safe by making responsible decisions 

and taking appropriate measures to prevent drunk and drugged driving. 

72062 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-second 

day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand five, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtieth. 

W 

[FR Doc. 05–23549 

Filed 11–29–05; 9:09 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5219 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5219

 To require sellers of opioids at retail to verify the identity of the 
prospective purchaser and enter certain information about the purchase 
 into the respective State's prescription drug monitoring system, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 8, 2018

 Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require sellers of opioids at retail to verify the identity of the 
prospective purchaser and enter certain information about the purchase 
 into the respective State's prescription drug monitoring system, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Opioid Prescription Verification Act 
of 2018''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR RETAIL SALE OF OPIOIDS.

    (a) In General.--In any State that maintains a prescription drug 
monitoring system, each regulated seller (as defined in section 102 of 
the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)) shall ensure that sales 
by such seller of an opioid at retail are made in accordance with the 
following:
            (1) The seller verifies the identity of the prospective 
        purchaser by requiring the prospective purchaser to present--
                    (A) an identification card that provides a 
                photograph and is issued by a State or the Federal 
                Government; or
                    (B) a document that, with respect to 
                identification, is considered acceptable for purposes 
                of sections 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(A) and 274a.2(b)(1)(v)(B) 
                of title 8, Code of Federal Regulations (as in effect 
                on or after March 9, 2006).
            (2) The seller enters into the State's prescription drug 
        monitoring system, at a minimum, the following information:
                    (A) The name of the opioid.
                    (B) The quantity sold.
                    (C) The name and address of the purchaser.
                    (D) The name and address of the patient for whom 
                the opioid is prescribed.
                    (E) The date and approximate time of the sale.
    (b) Delayed Applicability.--Subsection (a) applies to the sale of 
opioids at retail beginning on the date that is 6 months after the date 
of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Wendy Payne, Executive Director, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20648, or call (202) 512-7350.

Authority:Federal Advisory Committee Act, Pub. L. 92-463.

Dated: November 30, 2007.

Charles Jackson,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-5942 Filed 12-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


ABAZIAS,
INC..


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(CHAPTER
98, TITLE 15 U.S.C. SS. 7241)




I, Jesus
Diaz, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Abazias, Inc..;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) and we
have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;




c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and




b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.




Date:
      August 4, 2008/s/
      Jesus DiazJesus
      Diaz, Chief Financial
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62867]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5563]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Portland Cement Association

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 6, 2007, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301, et seq. (``the Act''), Portland Cement 
Association (``PCA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Praxair, Inc., Danbury, CT, has become an Associate 
Member.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and PCA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On January 7, 1985, PCA filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on February 
5, 1985 (50 FR 5015).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 14, 
2007. A notice as published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 
6(b) of the Act on July 13, 2007 (72 FR 38619).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-5563 Filed 11-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M