alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5



2005 Bonus Plan



|1. | Quarterly bonus payouts based on Company financial results and individual performance vs. MBOs.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | For senior management team, 75% of bonus amount based on financial results, 25% on individual MBOs.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | For other managers, 50% of bonus amount based on financial results, 50% on individual MBOs.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Unlike the 2004 plan, emphasis will be on financial metrics instead of corporate strategic goals.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|3. | Quarterly percentages of total annual bonus target are as follows:
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



Q1: 20%



Q2: 20%



Q3: 20%



Q4: 40% (based on quarterly and year-end results)



|4. | Financial Objectives (to be set prior to each quarter)
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Individual MBOs will be established based on company priorities
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Bryan
Arthur, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Farrallon, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Farrallon, Inc.





Date:
      August 11, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Bryan ArthurBryan
      ArthurChief
      Executive Officer,Principal
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of AEI Income & Growth Fund
XXII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB  for
the  period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 17, 2006



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 17, 2006
* Senior Judge Hall was assigned to the panel in this case but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2550

JOHN WESLEY OWNBY, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES GUY COHEN; JIM BECK, INCORPORATED; W. STEPHEN SCOTT, Defendants - Appellees, and HELEN PARRISH, Defendant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-98-19-C) Submitted: June 29, 1999 Decided: September 23, 1999 Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, * Senior Circuit Judge.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Wesley Ownby, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Joseph William Wright, III, Hawthorne Dill Battle, III, MCGUIRE, WOODS, BATTLE & BOOTHE, Charlottesville, Virginia; Patrick Dyer Allen, WILLIAMS, MULLEN, CHRISTIAN & DOBBINS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John W. Ownby, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denyinghis motion for partial summary judgment and dismissing with prejudice his claims alleging violations under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) and without prejudice his remaining state law claims. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Ownby v. Cohen, No. CA-98-19-C (W.D. Va. Sept. 8, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Jordan F. Veal, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Andrew J. Veal, administrator, defendant in error.

1. When in a proceeding under sections 4005, 4013 of the Code, against one as a tenant holding over, the defendant denies the tenancy, and sets up that he entered as the owner, and not as tenant, and an issue is formed and on trial, and the assumed landlord dies, and his administrator is made a party, the defendant cannot be sworn as a witness in his own behalf, unless for the special purpose of proving some fact transpiring since the death of the alleged landlord.

2. The verdict of the jury in this case, though not entirely satisfactory, is yet not so contrary to the testimony as to justify this Court in overruling the judgment of the Judge refusing a new trial.

Proceeding against tenant holding over. Motion for new trial. Evidence. Before R. L. Warthen, Esq., presiding by consent. Washington Superior Court. October Adjourned Term, 1870.

Andrew J. Veal, as guardian for his father Edward Veal, made affidavit on the 11th day of February, 1870, that he was the legal owner of a certain tract of land situated in Washington county, and that Jordan F. Veal was then occupying said land by sufferance; that deponent had demanded possession and said Jordan had refused to deliver the same to him. Whereupon, the usual warrant for the possession of the land issued. Jordan F. Veal made a counter-affidavit, and the case was returned to Washington Superior Court. Edward Veal having, in the meantime, died, Andrew J. Veal, as his administrator, was made the party plaintiff by consent. The cause being at issue, was submitted to a jury, who found for the plaintiff. A motion was made by defendant for a new trial, which was overruled by the Court. Whereupon, plaintiff excepted, upon the ground, among others, that the Court erred in refusing to admit Jordan F. Veal as a witness in his own behalf, the other party to the contract being dead.

Langmade & Evans, for plaintiff in error.

John N. Gilmore; Carswell & Denny, for defendant.

*512McCay, Judge.

The issue in this case is made by the two affidavits. The plaintiff’s affidavit declares that the defendant is the tenant of the deceased. The defendant’s affidavit denies this, and that alone is the issue or cause of action on trial. It seems to us, therefore, that the defendant comes directly within the exception in the Evidence Act. The issue or cause of action on trial is whether the defendant was the tenant of his father, and the father being dead, the case comes almost within the words as well as the spirit of the exception: Code, sec. 3798.

We should have been, perhaps, better satisfied with this verdict had it been for the other side. But it is not *decidedly*and *strongly*against the weight of evidence. We, too, are not a jury, and it would strike at the very root of the right of trial by jury if the Courts were to interfere in every case where they disagreed with the jury as to the proper verdict in a given case. The verdict must be such as to show passion, prejudice, etc. If calm, honest men may differ as to the proper verdict, the Courts ought not to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5181 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5181

 To require certain licensees under the Federal Power Act make annual 
   payments to the county in which a licensed hydropower facility is 
                    located, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2018

   Mr. Faso introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require certain licensees under the Federal Power Act make annual 
   payments to the county in which a licensed hydropower facility is 
                    located, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Local Taxpayer Protection Act of 
2018''.

SEC. 2. PAYMENT OF FEES BY CERTAIN HYDROPOWER FACILITY LICENSE HOLDERS.

    (a) Initial Payment.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, and annually thereafter for the duration of the 
applicable license and any subsequent license received for the same 
facility and related operations, a covered licensee shall make an 
annual payment to the county in which the applicable licensed project 
is located beginning in the amount of $1,800,000.
    (b) Increase in Subsequent Payments.--The amount of each annual 
payment occurring after the first annual payment shall increase by 2 
percent of the preceding annual payment.
    (c) Remaining Obligations.--The payment of funds under this section 
shall not affect the obligation of the covered licensee to pay any 
other funds required to be paid to a county under the terms of a 
judicial decree or settlement of an action brought by one or more 
counties against the covered licensee.
    (d) Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to authorize an increase in the rates and charges for 
electric energy of a covered licensee.
    (e) Covered Licensee Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
licensee'' means a State, or any subdivision thereof, that--
            (1) received a license under section 10 of the Federal 
        Power Act (16 U.S.C. 803) for a pumped-storage facility; and
            (2) filed for such license in April of 2017.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009243EN.01000801.xml

| 10.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/8

---

Call for proposals — JLS/2009/ERFX/CA

2009/C 243/06

The European Commission has launched a call for proposals to award grants to actions in support of the asylum policy.

The total indicative available amount will be EUR 9 176 666,67.

The text of the call, the application form and all other relevant supporting documents are available in English on the website of Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security of the European Commission:

http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/funding/refugee/funding_refugee_en.htm

---
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

            I, Raymond L. Carr, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterending March 31, 2007 of Kentucky Investors, Inc.;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.         The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, and we have:

 

            (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared,

 

            (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation, and

 

            (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internalcontrols over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting;and

 

5.         The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, tothe registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors:

 

            (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,process, summarize, and report financial information; and

 

            (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internalcontrols over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: May 10,2007                                                 By: /s/Raymond L. Carr

                                                                               Raymond L. Carr

                                                                               Vice President - Chief Financial Officer 

 

----

----
1
 EXHIBIT 4.96
 
 SHARE SALE AGREEMENT
 
    CROWN CONSOLIDATED GOLD RECOVERIES LTD
       DRDGOLD (South African Operations) (Pty) Ltd


2
 WHEREAS:
 
  
 
 NOW THEREFOR
  SALE AND PURCHASE
      CLOSING AND IMPLEMENTATION


3
  WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS
             WHOLE AGREEMENT, NO AMENDMENT


4
  DOMICILIUM CITANDI ET EXECUTANDI
  domicilia citandi et executandi
        domicilium citandi et
 executandi vis-à-vis
 vis-à-vis
  th
      domicilium citandi et executandi
    domicilium citandi et executandi
          domicilium citandi et executandi


5
  NO CESSION OR ASSIGNMENT
     COSTS
        /s/ MP Ncholo MP Ncholo Chairman For: DRDSA
      /s/ WT Beer  WT Beer Regional General Manager Assets and Commercial For: CCGR
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5215 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5215

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2018

    Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to prohibit employees found to have knowingly misused 
Department of Veterans Affairs purchase cards from serving as purchase 
                  card holders or approving officials.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Affairs Purchase Card 
Misuse Mitigation Act''.

SEC. 2. MISUSE OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS PURCHASE CARDS BY 
              DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 7 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 727. Misuse of Department purchase cards
    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary shall prohibit any employee of the 
Department who the Secretary or the Inspector General of the Department 
determines has knowingly misused a purchase card from serving as a 
purchase card holder or approving official. Such a prohibition shall be 
in addition to any other applicable penalty.
    ``(b) Misuse.--For purposes of this section, the term `misuse' 
means--
            ``(1) splitting purchases;
            ``(2) exceeding applicable purchase card limits or purchase 
        thresholds;
            ``(3) purchasing any unauthorized item;
            ``(4) using a purchase card without being an authorized 
        purchase card holder; or
            ``(5) violating ethics standards.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
725 the following new item:

``727. Misuse of Department purchase cards.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

GARY P. SALAMONE,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv412/LAC/MD

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.

Defendants.

O R D E R

This cause comes on for considerationuponthe magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated December 15, 2010. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and the objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12 day of January, 2011. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, December 7, 2007, 8 a.m. to December 7, 2007, 5 p.m., Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 13, 2007, 72FR63915.                

This meeting is being amended to change the format to a telephone conference and to change the date from December 7, 2007 to December 18, 2007. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: November 27, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5928 Filed 12-04-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7314

MICHAEL EUGENE TAYLOR, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BOBBY LANE; ROBERT POPE; JAMES SCHAFERS; CAREY WINDERS, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-624-5-CT-BO) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 7, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Eugene Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. E.B. Borden Parker, BADDOUR, PARKER, HINE & WELLONS, Goldsboro, North Carolina; Rudolph Alexander Ashton, III, MCCOTTER, MCAFEE & ASHTON, P.L.L.C., New Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Taylor appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to defendants on Taylor’s 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion. The district court properly found that there was no genuine issue of material fact and defendants were entitled tojudgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Lane , No. CA-97-624-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Knology, Inc. 

West Point, Georgia 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-161401 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-153213, 333-136570, 333-127113, 333-103248 and 333-34540 on Form S-8 of Knology, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2011,relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Knology, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ BDO USA, LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 15, 2011