alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009266EN.01000301.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 November 2009

2009/C 266/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4862 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4422 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89600 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3870 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5115 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4340 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,676 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 274,82 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2470 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3030 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2059 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6235 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5923 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,5180 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0552 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0698 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 733,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2338 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1467 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2675 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 059,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0553 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,149 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,0866 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,602 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5546 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7888 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,4950 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4862

JPY

Japanese yen

134,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4422

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89600

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3870

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5115

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4340

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,676

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

274,82

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2470

RON

Romanian leu

4,3030

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2059

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6235

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5923

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,5180

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0552

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0698

KRW

South Korean won

1 733,91

ZAR

South African rand

11,2338

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1467

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2675

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 059,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0553

PHP

Philippine peso

70,149

RUB

Russian rouble

43,0866

THB

Thai baht

49,602

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5546

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7888

INR

Indian rupee

69,4950

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cr-33-RS

HERDIS NEAL BROWN

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 52). No 

objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved 

and incorporated in this Order.

2. The Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence (Doc. 44) is 

DENIED.

3. The certificate of appealability is denied because Petitioner did not 

make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

ORDERED on December 31, 2013.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1 - Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Monster
Offers, a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Jonathan W. Marshall
------------------------
    Jonathan W. Marshall
    Principal Executive Officer
    Principal Financial Officer


Date  May 17, 2010
      ------------


<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ARTHUR D. DECESARE,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-244-SPM/WCS

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT

OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Reports

and Recommendations (docs. 5, 7). Plaintiff has been mailed copies and has been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Reports

and Recommendations, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Reports and Recommendations (docs. 5, 7)

are adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The case is dismissed.

3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. 4) is 
denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this fourteenth day of September, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DEMETRIUS SPRINGS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00081-MP-AK

J AVILES, WALTER A MCNEIL, PILAR TOURNAY,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Plaintiff, an inmate incarcerated within the Florida Department of Corrections, submitted

a civil rights complaint (doc. 1), alleging denial of medical care by personnel at Union

Correctional Institution. He did not submit either the filing fee or a motion for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis. 

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), provides that a prisoner may not

bring a civil action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915:

. . . if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained in

any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was

dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger

of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Plaintiff has had at least three prior prisoner actions dismissed within this District alone

on the grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim. The dismissed

cases include: Case Nos. 5:08cv366-SPM/MD; Case No 5:09cv5-SPM/EMT; and Case No.

5:09CV155-RS/AK. In Case No. 5:09cv155, Plaintiff was advised that he had reached three
Page 2 of 2

1:10cv81-MP/AK

strikes because of his prior filings.

The instant complaint has been sufficiently reviewed to discern that Plaintiff's allegations

do not bring him within the "imminent danger" exception set forth in 28 U.S.C. §1915(g).. 

Because Plaintiff has had at least three prior dismissals and is not under imminent danger

of serious physical injury, he is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. Furthermore, because

Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee at the time he submitted this civil rights action, this case must

be dismissed. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has clarified that the proper procedure in

such a situation is not to give the inmate time in which to pay the fee, rather dismissal is required

if a "three striker" does not pay the filing fee at the time he submits the complaint. Dupree v.

Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234 (11th Cir. 2002). Thus, this case must be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. §

1915(g). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of June, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Order entered March 19, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01192-CV

THE ESTATE OF LEAH RITA TILLOTSON, DECEASED

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 18359

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his 

reply brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to March 30, 2020.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


March 31, 2020


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 471 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:




The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on March 30, 2020, in
accordance with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We
consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the
Registration Statement (No. 333-235524) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the
sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.






	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-123-SPM-GRJ

CHARLES DENNIS CLAYTON,

MICHAEL J. WIESEN, 

DEBORAH L. PERRY,

WACHOVIA BANK, N.A., as

CUSTODIAN TRUST FOR

PLYMOUTH PARK TAX SERVICES

LLC, and VON FRASER in his 

official capacity as ALACHUA 

COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR,

 Defendants.

____________________________ /

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Von Fraser, Alachua County Tax Collector’s Motion

For Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint. (Doc. 21.) Defendant, Von

Fraser, Alachua County Tax Collector requests an extension of time to file a response

to the amended complaint because the United States sought leave to file a second

amended complaint. The Court in a separate order has granted the United States’

request to file a second amended complaint and therefore the extension is due to be

granted. The United States does not object to the requested extension. 

Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

1. Von Fraser, Alachua County Tax Collector’s Motion For Extension of Time to

Respond to Amended Complaint (Doc. 21) is GRANTED. 

2. Defendant Von Fraser, Alachua County Tax Collector shall file his response

Case 1:10-cv-00123-RH-GRJ Document 24 Filed 05/09/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

to the United States’ Second Amended Complaint by June 10, 2011. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 9 day of May 2011. 

th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-123-SPM-GRJ

Case 1:10-cv-00123-RH-GRJ Document 24 Filed 05/09/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Centra Software, Inc.
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul R. Gudonis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to
the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |    
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 12, 2004 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    PAUL R. GUDONIS
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        | 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Paul R. Gudonis President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 105 Filed 07/19/10 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 105 Filed 07/19/10 Page 2 of 11
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 105 Filed 07/19/10 Page 3 of 11
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 105 Filed 07/19/10 Page 4 of 11
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 105 Filed 07/19/10 Page 5 of 11
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 105 Filed 07/19/10 Page 6 of 11
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 105 Filed 07/19/10 Page 7 of 11
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 105 Filed 07/19/10 Page 8 of 11
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 105 Filed 07/19/10 Page 9 of 11
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 105 Filed 07/19/10 Page 10 of 11
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 105 Filed 07/19/10 Page 11 of 11
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 ***




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Shatrusen, Inc., (the “Company”), on
      Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to the
      requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
      of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), George C. Critz,
      Jr., the President, principal executive officer and principal financial officer
      of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:




1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and




2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
      covered by the Periodic Report.





Date:
                November 12, 2008
            By:
            /s/  
                George C. Critz, Jr.George
                C. Critz, Jr.President
                (Principal Executive Officer
              and
                Principal Financial Officer)




*  This
      certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing of Shatrusen, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933,
      as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
      before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general
      incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### STATE v. COFFEY

No. 148 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 642.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 July 1972.
Exhibit 23.1               Consent of McManus & Company, PC
                           Independent Public Accountants


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-110309) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-109481,
333-106074, and 333-97913) of Eagle Broadband, Inc., of our report dated
December 13, 2002, relating to the financial statements, which appear in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

/s/ McManus & Company, PC
-------------------------
McManus & Company, PC
Rockaway, New Jersey
July 29, 2004
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10-CR-53-SPM/WCS-1

ABBANA ROACH,

 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation (doc. 19) of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of

the Defendant, ABBANA ROACH, to Count One of the Indictment is hereby

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this twentieth day of August, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
   The Board of Directors
   Oilsand Quest Inc.
   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form S-3 (no. 333-168461) and the registration statements on Form S-8 (nos. 333-145079 and 333-135366) of Oilsands Quest Inc. of our reports dated July 12, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Oilsands Quest Inc. (a development stage company) as of April 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2010 and for the period from inception on April 3, 1998 to April 30, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2011, which reports appear in the April 30, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of Oilsands Quest Inc.
   /s/ KPMG LLP
   Calgary, Canada
 July 5, 2011
 71
**EXHIBIT 99.1**ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATEBARCLAYS BANK PLCGRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 8) PLC     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Barclays Bank PLC (the “Bank”), asServicer, pursuant to the Beneficiaries Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 23, 1999 (the“Agreement”), among the Bank, as Servicer and Barclaycard Funding PLC, as Investor Beneficiary,does hereby certify that:     1. The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings asset forth in the Agreement.     2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.     3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2005 was conducted under my supervision.     4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreementthroughout such calendar year and no material default in the performance ofsuch obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in theParagraph 5 below.     5. The following is a description of each material default in the performanceof the Servicer’s obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known tothe undersigned to have been made by the Servicer during the calendar yearended December 31, 2005, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each suchdefault, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each suchdefault and (iii) the current status of each such default:     None.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Annual Servicer’s Certificate this23rd day of June, 2006.           Barclays Bank PLC
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WARREN AIKEN, JR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00089-MP-WCS

JOSEPH DEREIGO, GLEN GRAHAM,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Objection the Magistrate’s Report and

Recommendations by Warren Aiken, Jr., Doc. 7. On March 16, 2010, the Magistrate Judge

directed Plaintiff to clarify his intentions or file an amended complaint by April 19, 2010, to

avoid having his case dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with an order. 

Plaintiff did not clarify his intentions or amend the complaint. Accordingly, on May 11, 2010,

the Magistrate Judge recommended the case be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff objected,

and so this Court reviews the objected-to analysis de novo. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute. Link

v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)

authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a court order. Moon v.

Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989).

Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to prosecute this case, this complaint should

now be dismissed without prejudice.

Plaintiff’s objection is unpersuasive in changing this conclusion. The objection discusses
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:10-cv-00089-MP-WCS

Plaintiff’s right to seek redress of grievances in the courts. In order to seek properly that redress,

however, a civil complaint such as this one must consist of 1) a short, plain statement of the

grounds for the court’s jurisdiction, 2) a short, plain statement of the facts showing the plaintiff

is entitled to relief, and 3) a demand for the relief sought. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a). 

If it is unclear what facts a plaintiff believes entitle him to relief, and what relief is sought, the

Magistrate may direct that plaintiff to clarify his intentions or amend his complaint, as the

Magistrate did here. The plaintiff must comply with that order, or risk dismissal. 

Here, Plaintiff did not comply with the Magistrate’s order, instead objecting to the

Magistrate’s instructions. As such, the complaint still lacks the necessary elements, described

with the necessary clarity, to allow this case to move forward. Plaintiff may re-file another

complaint later, that complaint must conform to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and

Plaintiff must comply with all court orders or risk dismissal of that complaint as well. 

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 6, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein. 

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of June, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge