alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. *RAY*DENNIS MORGAN.

(Filed 10 November, 1965.)

Appeal by defendant from *Brock, S.J.,*March Session 1965 of Stanly.

The defendant was charged in a bill of indictment, the first count in which charged that he unlawfully, wilfully and feloniously did break and enter a storehouse, shop, or warehouse occupied by E. H. Love and Roy L. Furr, trading as Wade H. Love Company, with intent to steal, take and carry away the merchandise, chattels, money, and valuables of the aforesaid firm; and in the second count defendant was charged with the larceny of certain items of merchandise from the storehouse of the above firm of the value of less than $200.00.

Defendant entered a plea of guilty. Before accepting such plea, the court inquired of defendant as to whether or not he understood the nature and consequences of the offenses charged, to which defendant answered that he did. Defendant then stated that he had counsel and that he was under no duress or coercion. Upon being satisfied that defendant’s rights had been protected, the judge accepted defendant’s plea of guilty.

The State’s sole evidence consisted of that of Jack Richardson, an S.B.I. agent, who testified that defendant made a confession and admitted the crimes charged.

Judgment was entered on the charge of breaking and entering, that defendant be confined in the State’s Prison for a period of not less than two nor more than four years; on the second, or larceny, *598count, defendant was given a similar sentence, the latter sentence to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed on the breaking and entering count.

Defendant gave notice of appeal and requested the court to appoint counsel to perfect his appeal. The court appointed his trial counsel to perfect his appeal in *-forma pauperis.*

*Attorney General Bruton, Staff Attorney Charles E. Clement for the State.*

*Charles H. McSwain for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s sole contention on this appeal is that the sentences imposed in the court below were excessive and harsh and, as he put it, “unwarranted by the true spirit of the statute.”

Under the provisions of G.S. 14-54, the crime charged in the first count, to which defendant pleaded guilty, is punishable by a sentence in prison of four months to ten years.

The crime charged in the second count in the bill of indictment, to wit, larceny of property from a storehouse, with felonious intent, *et cetera,*is a felony as at common law, without regard to the value of the property stolen. *S. v. Cooper,*256 N.C. 372, 124 S.E. 2d 91.

The court below could have imposed a maximum sentence of ten years on each count.

There is no merit in defendant’s contention, and the sentences imposed by the court below will be upheld.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2035 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2035

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To require the Transportation Security Administration to develop a 
   strategic plan to expand eligibility for the PreCheck Program to 
 individuals with Transportation Worker Identification Credentials or 
                   Hazardous Materials Endorsements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TSA Credential and Endorsement 
Harmonization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. STRATEGIC PLAN TO EXPAND PRECHECK PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Transportation Security 
Administration shall develop a strategic plan to expand eligibility for 
the PreCheck Program under section 44919 of title 49, United States 
Code, to individuals who have--
            (1) a Transportation Worker Identification Credential 
        issued under section 70105 of title 46, United States Code; or
            (2) a Hazardous Materials Endorsement under the Hazardous 
        Materials Endorsement Threat Assessment Program on the State-
        issued commercial driver's license of the individual.
    (b) Elements.--In developing the strategic plan required by 
subsection (a), the Administrator shall ensure that the plan--
            (1) allows individuals described in subsection (a) to opt 
        in to the PreCheck Program; and
            (2) provides the Transportation Security Administration 
        with the discretion--
                    (A) to determine whether an individual described in 
                subsection (a) meets the eligibility requirements for 
                the Program; and
                    (B) to establish alternative fee structures for the 
                Program.
    (c) Briefing to Congress.--Not later than 30 days after developing 
the strategic plan required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall 
brief the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 
Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of 
Representatives on the strategic plan.

            Passed the Senate September 10, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 2035

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To require the Transportation Security Administration to develop a 
   strategic plan to expand eligibility for the PreCheck Program to 
 individuals with Transportation Worker Identification Credentials or 
                   Hazardous Materials Endorsements.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Otter Tail Ag Enterprises, LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, KellyLongtin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  May 20, 2008

 
|   | /s/  Kelly Longtin       |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Kelly  Longtin           |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TECHSHELL, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv154/RS-MD

HARD CANDY CASES, LLC;

Defendant.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Amendment To Joint Planning And Schedule Report

(Doc. 171). The amendment to the Joint Planning And Schedule Report (Doc. 171) is

approved and is incorporated by reference as an amendment to the Scheduling and

Mediation Order (Doc. 72).

ORDERED on March 15, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      11,259,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,932,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 15,474,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            54,070,000
<PP&E>                                      49,865,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,181,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              81,754,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,366,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,911,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,007,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                81,754,000
<SALES>                                     93,483,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            93,483,000
<CGS>                                       80,622,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,759,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,368,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,408,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,960,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.01    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lux Energy Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shane Broesky, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Shane Broesky By: Shane Broesky Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: May 14, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Saratoga Resources, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





|                     |  |                                                               
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:   May 13, 2008 |  | /s/  Thomas Cooke                                             
|                     |  | Name:   Thomas Cooke                                          
|                     |  | Title:     Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth C ourt of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 13, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00108

- CV

VIA Metropolitan TRANSIT,

Appellant s

v.

Curtis MECK,

Appellee s

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CV01188

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant ’ s reply brief i s due on Dec em ber 1 1 , 2017

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(c).

Before the due date , Appellant filed a n unopposed first motion for extension of time to file the

reply brief until January 10, 2018 , for an extension of thirty days.

Appellant ’ s motion is GRANTED. Appellant ’ s reply brief is due on January 10, 2018

. See id. R. 38.6(d).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and af fixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of December, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  FREIGHT  MANAGEMENT  CORP.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Ibrahim Abotaleb, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                  /s/ Ibrahim Abotaleb
                                  ----------------------------------------------
Date: October 23, 2009            Ibrahim Abotaleb
                                  President, CEO and Principal Executive Officer
Case 4:10-cv-00293-WS-CAS Document 54-1 Filed 02/29/12 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:10-cv-00293-WS-CAS Document 54-1 Filed 02/29/12 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:10-cv-00293-WS-CAS Document 54-1 Filed 02/29/12 Page 3 of 3
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the “Trust”) does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that: 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2022 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 

/s/ Ron E. Hooper
Ron E. HooperSenior Vice President on behalf of Simmons Bank, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust
Dated: November 14, 2022 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) ofRegulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filedas part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Trust, whether made before or after thedate hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 
**
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 1 of 12
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 2 of 12
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 3 of 12
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 4 of 12
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 5 of 12
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 6 of 12
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 7 of 12
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 8 of 12
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 9 of 12
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 10 of 12
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 11 of 12
Case 4:10-cv-00109-RH-WCS Document 28 Filed 10/19/10 Page 12 of 12
EXHIBIT 4.8

December 29, 1997

Mr. Larry J. Newsome
Senior Vice President and CFO
Echelon International
One Progress Plaza, Suite 1500
St. Petersburg, Florida  33701

Re:      Construction Issues for Echelon Office Portfolio Loan
         NML Loan No.C-332156 (the "Loan")

Dear Mr. Newsome:

Construction repair issues were raised by Newbanks, Inc. in the following
reports in regards to the Echelon Office Portfolio which is security for the
Loan:

                   BUILDING AND DATE OF REPORT
                   Barnett Tower - December 4, 1997
                   100 Carillon - December 5, 1997 
                   McNulty Station - December 4, 1997
                   Highpoint Center - December 4, 1997

Each of the reports listed above contain itemized lists of necessary repairs for
the buildings that are located in Sections 7.1 of all the reports with the
exception of the McNulty Station report, in which the list is located on page 20
of the report. As a condition to closing the Loan, Echelon agrees to complete
all of the repairs noted in each of the reports. The repairs will be completed
within 120 days of the closing of the Loan. If the repairs are not completed
within 120 days, Northwestern has the right to retain third parties to
accomplish the repairs. Northwestern will be allowed access to the buildings to
conduct the repairs. All costs paid by Northwestern for such repairs shall
constitute an advance of loan proceeds under the Loan and the provisions of the
Restatement of Mortgage and Security Agreement dated as of December 30, 1997,
contained in the section captioned "Failure of Mortgagor to Act," shall apply to
such costs paid by Northwestern.

Sincerely,
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company


_______________________________________________
By: Carson D. Keyes, Vice President


The undersigned hereby agrees to the above.

Executed this ____day of December, 1997

BY: Echelon International Corporation, a Florida corporation

By: ___________________________________________
     Larry J. Newsome, Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

Attest: _______________________________________
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2208
THURSTON PAUL BELL, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; WALTER MATYCZYK, JR.; LEON K, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-03406-WDQ) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thurston Paul Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth L. Greene, Richard T. Morrison, Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Gretchen M. Wolfinger, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Thurston Paul Bell appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) denying his petition to quash a third-party recordkeeper summons issued by the Internal Revenue Service, (2) ordering enforcement of the summons, (3) denying his motions to disqualify the district court judge, and (4) denying his motion for the court to invalidate a judgment of a district court in Pennsylvania. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no abuse of discretion and no clear error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dist rict court. Bell v. United States , No. 1-06-cv-03406-WDQ (D. Md. filed July 11, 2007; entered July 13, 2007 & October 2, 2007). We deny the United States’ motion for sanctions, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DONALD RAFAEL McCISKILL,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:09cv378-WS

WENDEL WHITEHURST,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 33)

docketed August 30, 2011. The magistrate judge recommends that this case be

dismissed for failure to state a claim. The plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 35) to the

report and recommendation.

Having considered the record in light of the plaintiff's objections, the court finds

that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 33) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The plaintiff's third amended complaint (doc. 30) and this action are

DISMISSED for failure to state a claim.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED with

Case 3:09-cv-00378-WS-EMT Document 36 Filed 09/28/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

prejudice."

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of September , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00378-WS-EMT Document 36 Filed 09/28/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA i
. CASENUMBER: Q',[D¢V 394-@

v.

CARLOS F. LOFTON

MOTION REQUESTING AN ORDER
SEALING THE INDICTMENT

The United States of America requests this Court to issue an Order sealing the indictment
returned by the grand jury in this case, and in support of this motion states as follows:

1. The defendant has not been arrested as a result of the activities alleged in the
indictment. The current whereabouts of the defendant are unknown and the public revelation of
the indictment could severely hamper law enforcement’s ability to locate and apprehend the
defendant to answer the charges.

2. The United States further moves the Court that the indictment in this case shall
remain sealed until further written Order of this Court, except that the Clerk’s Office shall
provide two certified copies of the indictment to the United States Attorney for the Northern
District of Florida, two certified copies to the United States Marshal for the Northern District of

Florida, and one certified copy to the United States Probation Office for the Northern District of

Florida.



WHEREFORE, in order to arrest the defendant(s) before the indictment is made available
to the public, it is respectfully requested that the Court order the sealing of the indictment
returned in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

THOMAS F. KIRWIN
UNITED S8' IRNEY

Michael T. Simpson
Assistant United States Attorney
Florida Bar No.: 254339

111 North Adams Street
Tallahassee, FL 32301

(850) 942-8430

ORDER

The government’s motion is granted.

5

DONE AND ORDERED this the day of

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDG!