alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# AGENCY:

United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting Roundtable Discussion.

# DATE AND TIME:

Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 1-6 p.m. (CST).

# PLACE:

Omni Hotel Downtown, 700 San Jacinto Boulevard at 8th Street, Austin, TX 78701, Phone number (512) 476-3700.

# AGENDA:

The Commission will host an academic roundtable discussion regarding the Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) recommended voluntary voting system guidelines (VVSG). The discussion will be focused upon the following topics: (1) How to develop a risk assessment framework to provide context for evaluating the security implications of using various technologies in voting systems; (2) Whether the recommended TGDC standards create appropriate functional standards that promote innovation; (3) Are existing methodologies sufficient to test voting system software; (4) Merits of the various types of Direct (by the voter) and Indirect (by automation) Independent Verification techniques; (5) How to evaluate innovative systems, for which there are no standards for purposes of certification.

This meeting will be open to the public.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Matthew Masterson, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,

Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-5939  Filed 11-30-07; 1:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cr59-SPM

VINCENT CLARK

a/k/a "Tionne Robinson"

a/k/a "Garelle Anton" 

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One through Nine and Count

Twelve of this indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of

hearing Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to

enter a report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All

parties consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After

hearing, it is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.
Page 2 of 3

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:10cr59-SPM/WCS
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on March 2, 2011. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:10cr59-SPM/WCS
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63


OF
TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, John
Hummel, the President and principal executive officer of AIS Futures Management
LLC, the general partner of AIS Futures Fund IV, L.P., certify that (i) the
Annual Report of AIS Futures Fund IV, L.P. on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in
such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of AIS Futures Fund IV, L.P.







Date: 
March 26,
2008








/s/ John
Hummel


John
Hummel


President,
AIS Futures Management, LLC
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 2341

MICHAEL J. GARVEY ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
SETERUS, INC.; SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC.; HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, LP; LACEY M. MOORE; CHRISTOPHER T. SALYER; SHIANN SCHMIDT; SHAPIRO & INGLE, LLP; MICHAEL JAY EMREY; KYLE STEWART ,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge; Richard L. Voorhees, Senior District Judge. ( 5:16

- cv

- 00209

- GCM )

Submitted : March 29, 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Michael J. Garvey, Appellant Pro Se. Bradley R. Kutrow, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Lacey Moore Duskin, HUTCHENS, SENTER, KELLAM & PETTIT, P.A., Charlotte, North Carolina; Jason Kenneth Purser, SHAPIRO & INGLE LLP, Charlotte, North Carol ina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Garvey seeks to appeal the district court’s orde r dismissing his
complaint . We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was
not timely filed.
Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or
order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the
appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or r eopens the appeal period under Fed. R.
App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional
requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on Octo ber 18, 2017 . The notice
of appeal was filed on November 20, 2017 . Because Garvey failed to file a timely notice
of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the fac ts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Case 5:10-cv-00163-RS  -GRJ   Document 1-1    Filed 06/23/10   Page 1 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00163-RS  -GRJ   Document 1-1    Filed 06/23/10   Page 2 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00163-RS  -GRJ   Document 1-1    Filed 06/23/10   Page 3 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00163-RS  -GRJ   Document 1-1    Filed 06/23/10   Page 4 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00163-RS  -GRJ   Document 1-1    Filed 06/23/10   Page 5 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00163-RS  -GRJ   Document 1-1    Filed 06/23/10   Page 6 of 7

Case 5:10-cv-00163-RS  -GRJ   Document 1-1    Filed 06/23/10   Page 7 of 7
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANDY V. JOSEPH,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv377-SPM/WCS

KENNETH S. TUCKER, 

SECRETARY,FLORIDA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,,

Respondent.

________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated January 31, 2012 (doc. 17). The parties have been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the

report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 17) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The 2254 habeas petition is dismissed with prejudice as untimely.

Case 4:10-cv-00377-SPM-WCS Document 20 Filed 03/08/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The Court denies a certificate of appealability because Petitioner

has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right..

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of March, 2012.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:10cv377-SPM/WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00377-SPM-WCS Document 20 Filed 03/08/12 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ISABELLA PORTIA WARD,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09cv300/RS-AK

MICHAEL B. DONLEY, Secretary of

Department of the Air Force,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Notice of Potential Resolution (Doc. 19). Pursuant to Local

Rule 16.2(D), it is ordered:

1. This case is dismissed from the active docket of the court.

2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this Order, to

amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative purposes,

and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is directed to close the case

in its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on June 21, 2010. 

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1

The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-3738

___________

Dwight F. Johnson, Sr., *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

Schnucks Markets, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: July 2, 2003

 Filed: July 9, 2003

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dwight F. Johnson appeals the district court’s1

 grant of summary judgment in

his action alleging his employer violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42

U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’

submissions on appeal, we conclude the district court’s decision was correct for the

reasons stated therein. We do not address the claims Johnson raises for the first time

on appeal. See Spear v. Dayton’s, 771 F.2d 1140, 1144 (8th Cir. 1985) (refusing to

consider claim not presented to district court).
-2-

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Randy M. Griffin,
Chief Executive Officer of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Mesa Energy Holdings, Inc.



|                      |        |                              
|--------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------
|                      | By:    | /s/  RANDY
        M. GRIFFIN
|Date: August 14, 2012 | Name:  | Randy M. Griffin             
|                      | Title: | Chief Executive Officer      



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  FREIGHT  MANAGEMENT  CORP.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  September 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Ibrahim Abotaleb, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                  /s/ Ibrahim Abotaleb
                                  ----------------------------------------------
Date: October 8, 2008             Ibrahim Abotaleb
                                  President, CEO and principal executive officer
EXHIBIT 10.3

March 1, 2014



Paul Dickman

Safe Lane Systems, Inc.

4115 Scarlet Oak Ct.

Castle Rock, CO 80109



Dear Mr. Dickman,


Paul  Dickman  (hereinafter  "the  Contractor")  is pleased to provide Safe Lane
Systems, Inc.  (hereinafter "the Company",  "you", "your") with the professional
services  described  below.  This letter is to confirm our  understanding of the
terms and objectives of the engagement.


SCOPE OF ENGAGEMENT

Provide  management  and  administrative  services  for the  Company to generate
revenue growth and maximize profitability for the Company shareholders.


TERM OF ENGAGEMENT


This engagement  commenced  April 1, 2014 and will continue until  terminated in
writing by the Company or the Management Company or until altered in writing.


FEES AND BILLINGS


Our fees for the  services  outlined  above will be $5,000,  plus  out-of-pocket
expenses and an administrative fee of 8% of total billings. Monthly fees will be
due and payable by the last business day of each month.


Very truly yours,

Paul Dickman


/s/ Paul Dickman


APPROVED:


Safe Lane Systems, Inc.


Paul Dickman


Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Paul Dickman, CPA





March 1, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2472 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2472

                     One Hundred Sixteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and twenty

                                 An Act

 
  To redesignate the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Plum Brook 
Station, Ohio, as the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at the Neil A. 
                        Armstrong Test Facility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility 
Act''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
    Congress finds as follows:
        (1) Neil A. Armstrong, through his own definition, was first 
    and foremost as a test pilot.
        (2) A native of Wapakoneta, Ohio, Armstrong began his inspiring 
    career in space exploration in Cleveland, Ohio, at what is now the 
    NASA John H. Glenn Research Center.
        (3) Becoming the first human to land a spacecraft, and then set 
    foot upon, the moon, represents the greatest dream of any test 
    pilot.
        (4) Therefore, it is fitting that the premier aeronautics and 
    space test station in Ohio should be renamed in his honor.
SEC. 3. REDESIGNATION OF NASA JOHN H. GLENN RESEARCH CENTER AT PLUM 
BROOK STATION, OHIO, AS NASA JOHN H. GLENN RESEARCH CENTER AT THE NEIL 
A. ARMSTRONG TEST FACILITY.
    (a) Redesignation.--The NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Plum 
Brook Station, Ohio, is hereby redesignated as the NASA John H. Glenn 
Research Center at the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the station referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``NASA John 
H. Glenn Center at the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility''.
    (c) Savings.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter 
the relationship between the Plum Brook Station and the NASA John H. 
Glenn Research Center.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

OFC HOLDING, LLC, a Georgia

Limited Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09cv290/RS-MD

TAUNTON TRUSS, INC., a Florida

corporation, and ABIGAIL TAUNTON,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19). 

Defendants have not filed objections.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. The clerk is directed to enter defaults against Defendants.

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment for $374,096.97 for Plaintiff against

Defendants, Taunton Truss, Inc. and Abigail Taunton.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file after entry of judgment.

ORDERED on May 14, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Guanwei Recycling Corp. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Yang
Feng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:





1. The
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and;





2. The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      August 16, 2010/s/ Yang FengYang
      Feng
                Chief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 68132]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5938]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, December 11, 2007, 9 a.m.-12 Noon (CST).

PLACE: Omni Hotel Downtown, 700 San Jacinto Boulevard at 8th Street, 
Austin, TX 78701, Phone number (512) 476-3700.

AGENDA: The Commission will consider the following items: Adoption of 
the 2006 Election Day Survey Report; an amendment to EAC policy on the 
voting system reports clearinghouse; whether to transfer National Voter 
Registration Act (NVRA) regulations originally promulgated by the 
Federal Election Commission to a new Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 
site for EAC; individual State requests to change State-specific 
instructions to the national voter registration form. The Commission 
will receive end of year report presentations: From the EAC Testing and 
Certification; Election Administration Support; and Research Divisions 
and the EAC Executive Director. The Commission will elect officers and 
consider other administrative matters.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-5938 Filed 11-30-07; 1:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M