alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee was established by Public Law 98-181, November 30, 1983, to advise the Export-Import Bank on its programs and to provide comments for inclusion in the reports of the Export-Import Bank of the United States to Congress.

*Time and Place:*                         Tuesday, December 6, 2007, from 9:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. The meeting will be held at Ex-Im Bank in the Main Conference Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571.                    

*Agenda:*                         Agenda items include a briefing of the Advisory Committee members on challenges for 2008, their roles and responsibilities and an ethics briefing.                    

*Public Participation:*                         The meeting will be open to public participation, and the last 10 minutes will be set aside for oral questions or comments. Members of the public may also file written statement(s) before or after the meeting. If you plan to attend, a photo ID must be presented at the guard's desk as part of the clearance process into the building, and you may contact Susan Houser to be placed on an attendee list. If any person wishes auxiliary aids (such as a sign language interpreter) or other special accommodations, please contact, prior to November 29, 2007, Susan Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571, Voice (202) 565-3232 or TDD (202) 565-3377.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, contact Susan Houser, Room 1273, 811 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20571, (202) 565-3232.

Howard A. Schweitzer,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 07-5717 Filed 11-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BRANDON WALKER PROSKE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-3393

[July 20, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

562020CF002040A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine Austin, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MICHAEL SHANE TOWNSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv135-SPM/WCS

J. SPEIGHTS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed another

"request for immediate action." Doc. 15. I just recently entered a report and

recommendation, doc. 13, on Plaintiff's prior motions, docs. 10 and 11. This motion was

filed before Plaintiff would have received the first report and recommendation in the

mail.

Plaintiff states in his request, doc. 15, that he was brought out of his cell, taken to

an area out of the camera view, and then the unidentified person choked him and said,

"If you don't drop it, we will drop you." Id. Plaintiff is again seeking a restraining order.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:10cv135-SPM/WCS

This motion does not identify the person who threatened him. It is unknown

whether this person is a Defendant in this case or not. It is unknown when the events

occurred. It is unknown whether Plaintiff has sought protective custody or not. The

statement made in the motion, doc. 15, is troubling, but there are insufficient facts to

support issuance of a restraining order or preliminary injunction. Because Plaintiff's

motion is insufficient, the motion should be denied. 

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's request

for immediate action, doc. 15, construed as a motion for temporary restraining order, be

DENIED and this case REMANDED for further proceedings. 

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on July 23, 2010.

 s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.
#### SUGG v. PARRISH

No. 198 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 630.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
# ///,c^ WIS 

# u-v\'DDHuu<yi A: IS* 

# e&ftP/ftt Nwi m W" 

# fcdfy&-fe '&m: iu 

# 4jJ#$M-$1obtf!/-aes¥-7!*"*xrc wsj 

# f: M/tiffa ifafatfas fe m Wi

1 

# Ipuff mAt flfc^st/
I RLED m 1ST COURT OFAPPEALS

FEB - 2 2015

STOPHEfs . (• CHRISTOPHER A PHiNH 3LERK/

/,,/6/J L- H/fJW^mW'/-



### 1STCQJl^T'bFAPPEALS' HOUSTON. TEXAS 

### FEB - 2^015 CHRISTOPHER A.\bINE CLERK. RECEIVE.-! ~~—-| FIRS i COURT OFAPPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FEB -2 2015 GHRISTOPHER A. PRIME CLERK

_ 

# /wj /6/rf !jiiivj|l,,|i.jpijIji,JilrJIiii!i|li.iI|n,j,il|Ii)i„]I)|Jii] NORTH TE&ftS.TK P&DC ^-^
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the forthcoming meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         Inland Waterways Users Board (Board).                    

*Date:*                         March 14, 2007.                    

*Location:*                         New Orleans Marriott at the Convention Center Hotel, 859 Convention Center Boulevard, New Orleans, Louisiana 70130, (504-613-2890).                    

*Time:*                         Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. and the meeting is scheduled to adjourn at 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         The Board will consider its project investment priorities for the next fiscal year. The Board will also hear briefings on the status of both the funding for inland navigation projects and studies, and the Inland Waterways Trust Fund, and be provided updates of various inland waterways projects.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Mark R. Pointon, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW-CO, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20314-1000; Ph: 202-761-4258.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Any interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with the committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee.

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-584  Filed 2-8-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel, SNRP Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 26, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         11 a.m. to 12 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Phillip F. Wiethorn, Scientific Review Administrator, DHHS/NIH/NINDS/DER/SRB, 6001 Executive Boulevard; MSC 9529, Neuroscience Center; Room 3203, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, (301) 496-5388,                         *wiethorp@ninds.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 29, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5514  Filed 11-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5203 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5203

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to require producers to elect to 
receive price loss coverage or agriculture risk coverage under that Act 
    or Federal crop insurance under the Federal Crop Insurance Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2018

   Mr. Duncan of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to require producers to elect to 
receive price loss coverage or agriculture risk coverage under that Act 
    or Federal crop insurance under the Federal Crop Insurance Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRODUCER ELECTION TO RECEIVE PRICE LOSS COVERAGE OR 
              AGRICULTURE RISK COVERAGE OR FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE.

    Section 1115 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9015) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) Election To Receive Price Loss Coverage or Agriculture Risk 
Coverage or Federal Crop Insurance.--For the 2018 crop year, all of the 
producers on a farm shall elect to receive--
            ``(1) price loss coverage or agriculture risk coverage, as 
        determined by the election of the producers on the farm under 
        this section for the 2014 through 2018 crop years; or
            ``(2) Federal crop insurance under the Federal Crop 
        Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32(b)



TXU CORP.

Certificate Pursuant to Section 906

of Sarbanes  Oxley Act of 2002

CERTIFICATION OF CFO



The undersigned, Kirk R. Oliver, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of TXU Corp. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed
this 10th day of June, 2005.



| |  |  |  |  |  |        |  |                                                     
| |  |  |  |  |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |  |  |        |  | /s/ Kirk R. Oliver                                  
| |  |  |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Kirk R. Oliver                                      
| |  |  |  |  |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TXU Corp. and will be retained by TXU Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

MARK F. SPANGLER,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 14

- 36023

D.C. No. 2:12

- cv

- 00856

- RSM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Ricardo S. Martinez, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016 **

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges

.

Mark F. Spangler appeals pro se from the district court’s default judgment in

the government’s civil enforcement action alleging violations of the Investment

Advisors Act of 1940 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 36023

jurisdiction under 28 U .S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion

, NewGen,

LLC v. Safe Cig, LLC , 840 F.3d 606, 616 (9th Cir. 2016) , and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in granting the government ’s

motion for default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2)

. See

Eitel v. McCool , 782 F.2d 1470, 1471

- 72 (9th Cir. 1986) (setting forth factors for

determining whether to enter default judgment) . The district court did not err in

considering the impact of Spangler’s criminal conviction o n its evaluation of the

default judgment factors

. See Collins v. D.R. Horton, Inc. , 505 F.3d 874, 882 (9th

Cir. 2007) (“[A] final judgment retains its collateral estoppel effect, if any, while

pending appeal .”).

We do not consider arguments that were not presented to the district court.

See Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TIMOTHY DEAN PETERSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv244/RS/EMT

N. ROBINSON, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On September 21, 2010, this

court entered an order giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to pay the filing fee or submit a

properly completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 4). Plaintiff failed to respond to the

order; therefore, on October 27, 2010, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause,

within twenty-one (21) days, why this action should not be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court (Doc. 7). The time for compliance with the show cause order has

now elapsed, and Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or submitted a properly completed motion to

proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 22nd day of November 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 5:10cv244/RS/EMT
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SIDNEY MARTS,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv240/LAC/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated April 16, 2012 (doc. 73). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of objections

filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 47) is DENIED.

3. Petitioner’s “Motion for Evidentiary Hearing w/ Motion for Judgment [sic] on

Pleadings” (doc. 71) is DENIED.

Case 3:10-cv-00240-LC-EMT Document 79 Filed 05/17/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

4. The Motion for Certificate of Appealability (doc. 76) is DENIED and a certificate

of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17 day of May, 2012. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:06cv2/LAC/EMT

Case 3:10-cv-00240-LC-EMT Document 79 Filed 05/17/12 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 18(a)

February 18, 2010

Energy Future Holdings Corp.

1601 Bryan Street

Dallas, Texas 75201

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We have audited the
consolidated financial statements of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (EFH Corp.) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 (successor), and for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (successor), the period from October 11, 2007
through December 31, 2007 (successor) and the period from January 1, 2007 through October 10, 2007 (predecessor), included in your Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission and have issued our report thereon
dated February 18, 2010 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related to EFH Corp. completing its merger with Texas Energy Future Merger Sub Corp and becoming a subsidiary of Texas Energy Future
Holdings Limited Partnership on October 10, 2007). Note 1 to such financial statements contains a description of your change, during the year ended December 31, 2009, in the date for the annual goodwill impairment test for your reporting
units. In our judgment, such change is to an alternative accounting principle that is preferable under the circumstances.



|                         
|-------------------------
|Yours truly,             
|                         
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|                         
|Dallas, Texas
10.2


Exhibit 10.2







Written description of the loan agreement with Anastasiia Iurova




Loan Agreement Between:




Anastasiia Iurova and Lagoon Group Corp.







Terms of the Loan Agreement:




1.

Ms. Iurova has provided and may provide additional Loans to Lagoon Group Corp. from time to time to pay for company’s expenses.

2.

The Loans are non-interest bearing and payable to Ms. Iurova upon demand.

3.

Ms. Iurova does not have any obligation to provide Loans to Lagoon Group Corp. and may do so only if he wishes.