alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHARLES WIGGINS,

 Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:09cv332/MCR/MD

KULONE TERRELLE,

PHILLIP TERRELLE,

 Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on August 12, 2009, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction, and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of September, 2009.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Your Event,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this certificate
in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
November 30, 2009 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission
("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Marilyn Montgomery
----------------------
    Marilyn Montgomery
    President/CFO


Date  January 5, 2010
      ---------------


<PAGE>
# CE2013168EN.01014402.xml

| 14.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 168/144 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 168/144

---

Tuesday 13 December 2011Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors (Mr P. Russo - IT)

P7_TA(2011)0557

European Parliament decision of 13 December 2011 on the nomination of Pietro Russo as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C7-0348/2011 – 2011/0813(NLE))

2013/C 168 E/31

(Consultation)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0348/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0348/2011),

| — | having regard to the fact that at its meeting of 23 November 2011 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the fact that at its meeting of 23 November 2011 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors,

| — | having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0420/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0420/2011),

| A. | whereas Pietro Russo fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU, |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Pietro Russo fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU,

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council's nomination of Pietro Russo as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council's nomination of Pietro Russo as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TERRY C. LANCASTER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09cv283/RS-EMT

BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Order, Report and Recommendation 

(Doc. 9) and Plaintiff’s Objections (Doc. 10). I have considered Plaintiff’s objections de

novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Order, Report and Recommendation is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§1915e)(2)(B)(i) as malicious.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on September 14, 2009.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

AARON HUTTON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:09cv343/MCR/EMT

SONNY BEACH, INC., a Florida

Corporation, and STEVEN NORTON, 

individually, 

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court upon the parties' Joint Motion to

Approve Settlement and Release Agreement and Dismiss with Prejudice Plaintiff's

Complaint and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:

The parties' Joint Motion to Approve Settlement and Release Agreement and

Dismiss with Prejudice Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby GRANTED. The Court finds the

parties' settlement to be fair and reasonable in light of a bona fide dispute. Accordingly, the

parties' Settlement and Release Agreement is hereby approved and Plaintiffs’ Complaint

is dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own fees and costs except as

provided in the Settlement, and Release Agreement. All pending motions are deemed

moot. This Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of sixty (60) days to enforce the terms

of the settlement agreement.

 DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of March 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2009122EN.01000601.xml

| 30.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 May 2009

2009/C 122/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4098 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4453 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87290 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6678 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5128 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8785 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,825 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 282,48 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4762 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1825 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1737 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7671 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5501 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9273 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2135 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0350 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 764,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2413 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6263 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3500 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 539,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9167 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,516 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,4455 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,377 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8320 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,4340 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,4260 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4098

JPY

Japanese yen

135,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4453

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87290

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6678

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5128

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8785

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,825

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

282,48

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4762

RON

Romanian leu

4,1825

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1737

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7671

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5501

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9273

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2135

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0350

KRW

South Korean won

1 764,04

ZAR

South African rand

11,2413

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6263

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3500

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 539,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9167

PHP

Philippine peso

66,516

RUB

Russian rouble

43,4455

THB

Thai baht

48,377

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8320

MXN

Mexican peso

18,4340

INR

Indian rupee

66,4260

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
gthp_ex1048





 







Exhibit 10.48






 



FORM OF ADDITIONAL DEBTOR JOINDER


 


Security Agreement dated as of December 30, 2019
made by Guided Therapeutics, Inc. and its subsidiaries party
thereto from time to time, as Debtors to and in favor of the
Secured Parties identified therein (the “Security
Agreement”)


 


Reference
is made to the Security Agreement as defined above; capitalized
terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings given to such terms in, or by reference in, the Security
Agreement.


 


The
undersigned hereby agrees that upon delivery of this Additional
Debtor Joinder to the Secured Parties referred to above, the
undersigned shall (a) be an Additional Debtor under the Security
Agreement, (b) have all the rights and obligations of the Debtors
under the Security Agreement as fully and to the same extent as if
the undersigned was an original signatory thereto and (c) be deemed
to have made the representations and warranties set forth therein
as of the date of execution and delivery of this Additional Debtor
Joinder. WITHOUT LIMITING THE GENERALITY OF THE FOREGOING, THE
UNDERSIGNED SPECIFICALLY GRANTS TO THE SECURED PARTIES A SECURITY
INTEREST IN THE COLLATERAL AS MORE FULLY SET FORTH IN THE SECURITY
AGREEMENT AND ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES TO THE WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL
PROVISIONS SET FORTH THEREIN.


 


Attached
hereto are supplemental and/or replacement Schedules to the
Security Agreement, as applicable.


 


An
executed copy of this Joinder shall be delivered to the Secured
Parties, and the Secured Parties may rely on the matters set forth
herein on or after the date hereof. This Joinder shall not be
modified, amended or terminated without the prior written consent
of the Secured Parties.


 




 








 






 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Joinder to be
executed in the name and on behalf of the undersigned. [Name of
Additional Debtor


 


By:
Name:


Title:


Address:


Dated:
# C_2009240EN.01000102.xml

| 7.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5610 — Predica/SFL/Parholding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 240/02

On 29 September 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision, which amends and replaces the previous decision of 24 September 2009 (SG-Greffe(2009) D/5619 — C(2009) 7486), is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The notice relating to the previous decision was published in OJ C 235, 30.9.2009.

The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5610. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5610. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv71/RS-MD

KARA-O-KING, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s response to my order to show cause (Doc. 20). 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants 

Robert Paynter, Jr., Christopher Dunn, and David Harris are dismissed 

without prejudice.

2. Plaintiff shall serve the remaining Defendants not later than December 

29, 2010. 

3. The U.S. Marshal shall at Plaintiff’s expense effect service of process 

on Defendant Anthony Griffin. 

ORDERED on November 30, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ALBERT MULBERRY, JR,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00132-MP -GRJ

SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 18, Respondent’s motion for an

extension of time until January 6, 2011, to respond to the Petition due to exigent

circumstances. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

1. That the motion, Doc. 18, is GRANTED. Respondent shall respond to the

Petition on or before January 6, 2011.

2. Petitioner shall have until February 7, 2011, to file a reply, if any.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22 day of December 2010. 

nd

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
#### WOODARD v. INSURANCE CO.

No. 13 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 282.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 March 1980.
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 5:10cr39-RH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 5:10cr39-RH

MARTIN RAMIREZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER DENYING THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF

ERROR CORAM NOBIS OR AUDITA QUERELA

The defendant pleaded guilty to five counts. One count charged possessing 

firearms in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime. The sentence on that count was 

30 years consecutive to the sentence on the other counts. This was the minimum 

mandatory sentence, because the firearms were machine guns. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 924(c)(1)(B). 

The defendant has unsuccessfully pursued a direct appeal, motion for relief 

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and application for leave to file a second motion under 

§ 2255. In denying the application for leave, the Eleventh Circuit explained that

recent Supreme Court decisions do not call into question the validity of the 

defendant’s 924(c) conviction. 

Case 5:10-cr-00039-RH-GRJ Document 430 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:10cr39-RH

The defendant now has filed an application for relief that the defendant 

labels a petition for a writ of error coram nobis or audita querela. The application is 

procedurally and substantively unfounded. The only proper vehicle for obtaining 

relief on grounds like those the defendant now asserts is a § 2255 motion. But a 

defendant may pursue a second or successive § 2255 motion only if the court of 

appeals authorizes it. This court lacks jurisdiction to address a successive § 2255 

motion. And the defendant has asserted nothing that would entitle him to relief, 

even in a timely first § 2255 motion. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The petition for a writ of error coram nobis or audita querela, ECF No. 429, 

is denied. The clerk must enter a judgment so providing.

SO ORDERED on November 11, 2016.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge 

Case 5:10-cr-00039-RH-GRJ Document 430 Filed 11/11/16 Page 2 of 2
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 

FORM OF 
 CERTIFICATE OF

 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 

OF 
 SANCHEZ PRODUCTION
PARTNERS LP 
 This Certificate of Limited Partnership of Sanchez Production Partners LP (the “Partnership”) is being filed
pursuant to Section 17-217 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, 6 Del. C. §§ 17-101 et seq., in connection with the conversion of Constellation Energy Partners LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, to a Delaware limited partnership. 
 The undersigned, being the sole general partner of the Partnership, does
hereby certify as follows: 
 1. The name of the Partnership is: Sanchez Production Partners LP. 

2. The address of the Registered Office of the Partnership in Delaware is 1675 South State Street, Suite B, Dover, Delaware 19901. The
Partnership’s Registered Agent at that address is Capitol Services, Inc. 
 3. The name and business address of the sole general partner
is: 
 Sanchez Production Partners GP LLC 
  

 
 Houston, Texas
77002 
 4. This Certificate shall become effective on             , 2014, at
                 .m. 
 In witness whereof, the undersigned,
being the sole general partner of the Partnership, has executed this Certificate of Limited Partnership as of the              day of
            , 2014. 
  

			
	SANCHEZ PRODUCTION PARTNERS GP LLC
		
	By:	 	 
	Name:	 	 
	Title:
# C_2009149EN.01000501.xml

| 1.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 June 2009

2009/C 149/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4134 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,51 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4470 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85210 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8125 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5265 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0180 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,882 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,55 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7036 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4520 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2072 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1614 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7359 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6275 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9540 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1656 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0441 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 802,43 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,8853 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6545 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2730 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 427,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9681 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,865 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,8810 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,140 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7469 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,5537 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,5180 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4134

JPY

Japanese yen

135,51

DKK

Danish krone

7,4470

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85210

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8125

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5265

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0180

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,882

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,55

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7036

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4520

RON

Romanian leu

4,2072

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1614

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7359

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6275

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9540

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1656

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0441

KRW

South Korean won

1 802,43

ZAR

South African rand

10,8853

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6545

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2730

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 427,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9681

PHP

Philippine peso

67,865

RUB

Russian rouble

43,8810

THB

Thai baht

48,140

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7469

MXN

Mexican peso

18,5537

INR

Indian rupee

67,5180

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### STATE v. WILSON

No. 121 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 399.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 August 1972.
#### Annie M. Austin, Appellant, *v.*The Buffalo Electric Vehicle Company, Respondent.

*Austin*v. *Buffalo Electric Vehicle Co.,*173 App, Div. 925, appeal dismissed.

(Argued November 18, 1918;

decided December 3, 1918.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 14, 1916, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant. Plaintiff, while attending an electrical show in New York city entered a booth in which there were three automobiles manufactured by defendant. While she was examining the exhibits one of these automobiles was set in motion by a bystander, struck the plaintiff, and caused the injuries complained of. The Appellate Division held that it did not appear from the evidence that the automobile which caused the injury was in the possession or under the control of the defendant and that it did appear that the proximate cause of the injury was the negligent act of a third person for which the defendant was not responsible. The appellant died pending the appeal.

*Litchfield F. Moynahan*and *Adrian B. Moynahan*for appellant.

*Harold C. Aron*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His go cK, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Case 1:06-cv-14985-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009259EN.01003301.xml

| 29.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 259/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/33

---

Call for proposals under the 2010 Ideas work programme of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

2009/C 259/12

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the 2010 Ideas work programme of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call. Call deadline and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website.

Ideas Work Programme:

Ideas Work Programme:

Call Title: ERC Advanced Investigators Grant

Call Identifier: ERC-2010-AdG

This call for proposals relates to the work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2009) 5928 of 29 July 2009.

Information on the modalities of the call, the work programme, and the guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---