alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Ex parte Luis Gustavo Ventura Gil

No. 06

- 23

- 00215

- CR Appeal from the County Court of Kinney County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 12027CR ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice

Rambin

, Chief Justice Stevens and Justice

van Cleef participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find reversible error in the judgment of

the court below. Therefore, we reverse the tria l court ’ s order denying Gil ’s requested relief on

his appl ication for a writ o f h abe as corpus a nd remand the cau s e f or further proceedings

consistent with th e precede nt of the Fourt h Court of Appeals

. We note that the appellant, Luis Gustavo Ventura Gil , has adequately indicated his

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 1, 2023
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, Richard R. Walters, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's most recent fiscal quarter (Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's auditors and the audit committee of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's board of directors:

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 13, 2005





By   /s/ Richard R. Walters



Richard R. Walters, President and

Chief Executive Officer
MEMO ENDORSED,,s 

THE LAW OFFICE OF JUSTIN A. ZELLER, P.C. I 

222 BROADWAY, lgTH FLOOR 

NEW YORK, NY 10038 

PHONE (212) 897-5859 

FAX (212) 860-9169 

EMAIL JAZELLER@ZELLERLEGAL.COM 

June 1, 2007 

BY HAND 

Hon. Richard M. Berman 

United States District Court 

Southern District of New York 

500 Pearl Street, Rm 14A 

New York, NY 11201 

Re: Pannell v. Dr. Jay's Inc. 

Docket No.: 07 cv 3503 

Dear Judge Berman, I 

The undersigned is counsel to plaintiff in the above referenced 

matter. I write to request a brief adjournment of the June 5, 

2007, initial pretrial conference scheduled at 10:15 AM. This is 

the first such request. 

In error, I failed to notify defense counsel of the correct date 

of the conference until today. This afternoon I emailed to 

defense counsel the Court's letter scheduling the pretrial 

conference . 

Defense counsel has informed me that she is unavailable on June 

5, 2007 because of a different Court conference she must attend, 

which was scheduled months ago. 

I humbly request the Court's forgiveness and request an 

alternative date for the conference. As a case management plan 

has not yet been set, this adjournment will not affect any other 

date. My adversary consents to the adjournment. 

The parties are currently involved in settlement discussions and 

pu to meet i-.grson g?J.,&~.Q.day, June 4, 2007. 

USDC SDNY 

DOCUMENT 

1 ELECTRONICALLY FILED 

l i DOC #: 

id i : ?'J ~4" FILED: r- Y , Lm7 i - .- -- ."! f L, , ." . .* .- " --- 

Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 3 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Respectfully submitted, A 4 

/ Justin A. Zeller . 

CC: Diane ~indholz, counsel for defendant, via fax at (212) 972- 

3213 

Case 1:07-cv-03503-RMB Document 3 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ROBERT PAUL KNOWLES,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-00166-RH-GRJ

BARD, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

In the Court’s Order dated December 6, 2010, Plaintiff was directed to file on

before December 20, 2010 a completed financial affidavit to support his motion for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 11.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to

comply with this order within the time allotted would result in a recommendation to the

district judge that this cause be dismissed. Id. As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed the

completed affidavit nor otherwise communicated with the Court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing on or before January 11, 2011 why this

cause should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

2. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to the district

judge that this case be dismissed. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 28 day of December, 2010. th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1
 COMPANYS OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
 GRACECHURCH
CARD FUNDING (NO. 5) PLC
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the Issuer;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the Issuer; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of Notes for the period between January 1, 2005 and the end of
the Issuers fiscal year on December 31, 2005.
   By:
    
    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName: Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:   Director
 - 29 -
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6935

RONALD MCCLARY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DIXIE, Nurse for NCDPS; JOHN DOE, Dietitian for NCDPS , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 3:18

- cv
- 00395

- MR )

Submitted : August 2 2 , 2019 Decided: August 27, 2019

Before KING and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ronald McClary, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Ronald McClary seeks to ap peal the district court’s order denying McClary’s motions for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. C iv. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order McClary seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10-CR-63-SPM/WCS-1

NICHOLAS MCCRAY,

 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation (doc. 24) of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of

the Defendant, NICHOLAS MCCRAY, to Count One of the Information is hereby

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this twentieth day of August, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 233 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Amendments of 1977 to require the 

Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to report certain 

hiring to carry out the Safe Drinking Water Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2019 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself and Mr. CARPER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Amendments of 1977 

to require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to report certain hiring to carry out the 

Safe Drinking Water Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘EPA Special Hiring 

5 Authority Transparency Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 233 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO REPORT HIRING TO CARRY OUT 

2 THE SAFE DRINKING WATER ACT. 

3 Section 11(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Amend4 ments of 1977 (42 U.S.C. 300j–10) is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘(b) To the extent’’ and insert6 ing the following: 

7 ‘‘(b) APPOINTMENT OF PERSONNEL.— 

8 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—To the extent’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(2) REPORTING OF HIRING REQUIRED.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 

12 days after an appointment is made under this 

13 subsection, the Administrator of the Environ14 mental Protection Agency shall provide notifica15 tion of the appointment to— 

16 ‘‘(i) the Committee on Environment 

17 and Public Works of the Senate; 

18 ‘‘(ii) the Committee on Homeland Se19 curity and Governmental Affairs of the 

20 Senate; 

21 ‘‘(iii) the Committee on Energy and 

22 Commerce of the House of Representa23 tives; and 

24 ‘‘(iv) the Committee on Oversight and 

25 Reform of the House of Representatives. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 233 IS

1 ‘‘(B) NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.—The 

2 notification required under subparagraph (A) 

3 shall include the following information about 

4 the appointment that was made under this sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(i) The name of the appointee. 

7 ‘‘(ii) The title of the appointee. 

8 ‘‘(iii) The salary of the appointee. 

9 ‘‘(iv) A detailed justification explain10 ing why the Administrator of the Environ11 mental Protection Agency deemed the ap12 pointment necessary to appropriately dis13 charge the functions of the Administrator 

14 under the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 

15 U.S.C. 300f et seq.) and other provisions 

16 of law.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.1
                                                                    Page 1 of 1



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------



                                 STRAIGHT NOTE




     $200,000          South El Monte, California         November 11, 1999
-----------------


         For value received, Lee Pharmaceuticals promises to pay Mark DiSalvo
or order, at South El Monte, California the sum of TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND
DOLLARS, with interest from November 11, 1999, on unpaid principal at the
rate of twenty (20) per cent per annum; principal is payable monthly,
commencing on December 25, 1999, with monthly principal payments of $10,000.
Interest shall be calculated on the basis of the unpaid principal balance
daily, based on a 365-day year, actual day month and payable monthly.
Principal and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United States.
If action were instituted on this note, I promise to pay such sum as the
Court may fix as attorney's fees. This note is secured by the following
trademarks; Cope and Astring-o-Sol.

        11/29/99                     /s/ Ronald G. Lee
--------------------           --------------------------------------
         Date                  Lee Pharmaceuticals - Ronald G. Lee

        11/24/99                     /s/ Michael L. Agresti
--------------------           ------------------------------------------------
         Date                  Lee Pharmaceuticals - Michael L. Agresti

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2009272EN.01001101.xml

| 13.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 November 2009

2009/C 272/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4922 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4412 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90200 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2480 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5106 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3915 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,505 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,14 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7086 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1411 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2995 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2081 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6062 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5702 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,5646 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0287 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0716 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 727,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1420 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1867 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2955 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 066,34 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0466 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,935 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,0070 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,713 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5761 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,6791 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,5969 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4922

JPY

Japanese yen

134,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4412

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90200

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2480

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5106

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3915

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,505

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,14

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7086

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1411

RON

Romanian leu

4,2995

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2081

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6062

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5702

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,5646

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0287

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0716

KRW

South Korean won

1 727,11

ZAR

South African rand

11,1420

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1867

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2955

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 066,34

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0466

PHP

Philippine peso

69,935

RUB

Russian rouble

43,0070

THB

Thai baht

49,713

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5761

MXN

Mexican peso

19,6791

INR

Indian rupee

69,5969

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 7 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 7 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 7 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JEFFERY LAMAR COLE,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv178/MCR/MD

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on June 3, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after reviewing

objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is adopted as the

opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s federal claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim upon which relief

can be granted.

3. Plaintiff’s state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to his

filing them in state court.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of July, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2010060EN.01000102.xml

| 11.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5707 — Tennet/E.ON)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 60/02

On 4 February 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5707. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5707. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 26 (Thursday, February 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5982-5983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-556]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Developmental/Exploratory Alcohol 
Center Grant Applications Review.
    Date: April 11, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Churchill Hotel, 1914 Connecticut Ave., NW., Washington, 
DC 20009.
    Contact Person: Abraham P. Bautista, PhD, Chief, Extramural 
Project Branch Review, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, RM 
3039, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-9737, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cba9aabebfa2b8bfaaaa8ba6aaa2a7e5a5a2a3e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="93f1f2e6e7fae0e7f2f2d3fef2faffbdfdfafbbdf4fce5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 92.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs;

[[Page 5983]]

93.891, Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 2, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-556 Filed 2-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MCKENZIE JACOBS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:09-CV-330-SPM/WCS

C W ROBERTS CONTRACTING

INCORPORATED,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon notification from counsel that

the case has settled. Pursuant to Northern District of Florida Local Rule 16.2(D),

it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of 60 days, during

which time any party may move to reopen for good cause shown.

DONE AND ORDERED this fourteenth day of January, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge