alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ERNEST LEE THOMAS,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:10cv244/MCR/MD

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, a pre-trial detainee confined at the Escambia County Jail,

commenced this action on July 9, 2010 by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus

under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1). Petitioner failed to use the court form for filing his

petition, and failed to sign it. In addition, petitioner failed to pay the $5.00 filing fee

or submit an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, on

July 12, 2010 the court entered an order requiring petitioner to file, within twentyeight days, an amended petition on the court form, along with either the filing fee or

an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 3). Petitioner was warned that

failure to comply with the order would result in dismissal of his case. 

Having received no response from petitioner, an order to show cause was

issued on August 23, 2010 giving petitioner fourteen days to show cause why this

case should not be dismissed. (Doc. 4). That deadline has passed, and petitioner

has not responded. 
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be dismissed without prejudice for petitioner’s failure to comply

with an order of this court and failure to prosecute this action.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 24 day of September, 2010.

th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Anyobjections to these proposed findings and recommendations mustbe filed

within fourteen days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that

may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636;

United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No: 3:10cv244/MCR/MD
|=                                                                    |                              
|-------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------
|Household Finance Corporation                                        |                              
|Household Revolving Home Equity Loan Trust 1996-2                   
|Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates - Series 1996-2
|P & S Agreement Date:              November 1, 1996                 
|Original Settlement Date:           November 26, 1996               
|Series Number of Class A-1 Certificates:     441919AK3              
|                                                                     |                              
|Original Sale Balance:             $776,373,000                     
|=                                                                    |                              
|                                                                     |                              
|                                                                     |                              
|                                                                     | Sum of 1/20/2000 - 12/20/2000
|2000 AGGREGATE PAYMENTS                                              | Distribution Dates           
|                                                                     |                              
|Distribution Date                                                    | Total 2000 (1)               
|                                                                     |                              
|Class A-1 Interest Distributed                                       | 14,441,687.80                
|Investor Principal Distribution A-1                                  | 77,196,343.54
# C_2010144EN.01003001.xml

| 3.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/30

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 June 2010

2010/C 144/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2218 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4403 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83345 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5668 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4148 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9220 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,779 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 275,88 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1008 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1873 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9317 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4641 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,2848 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5217 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8058 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7230 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 497,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,3686 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3448 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2620 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 314,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0234 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,089 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,0630 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,818 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2491 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 15,7618 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 57,4060 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2218

JPY

Japanese yen

112,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4403

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83345

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5668

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4148

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9220

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,779

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

275,88

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1008

RON

Romanian leu

4,1873

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9317

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4641

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,2848

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5217

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8058

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7230

KRW

South Korean won

1 497,50

ZAR

South African rand

9,3686

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3448

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2620

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 314,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0234

PHP

Philippine peso

57,089

RUB

Russian rouble

38,0630

THB

Thai baht

39,818

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2491

MXN

Mexican peso

15,7618

INR

Indian rupee

57,4060

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Ronald J. Buschur, Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended January 3, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ RONALD J. BUSCHUR                
|                     |  |     |  | Ronald J. Buschur                    
|                     |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
# C_2010135EN.01001901.xml

| 26.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/19

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 May 2010

2010/C 135/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2360 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,63 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4421 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86080 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7960 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4339 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0848 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,664 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,34 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7074 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1150 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1820 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9488 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4928 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3095 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6421 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8429 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7408 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 500,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,7392 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4400 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2715 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 446,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1029 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,547 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,4500 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,112 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3026 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0745 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 58,0730 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2360

JPY

Japanese yen

111,63

DKK

Danish krone

7,4421

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86080

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7960

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4339

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0848

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,664

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,34

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7074

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1150

RON

Romanian leu

4,1820

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9488

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4928

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3095

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6421

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8429

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7408

KRW

South Korean won

1 500,79

ZAR

South African rand

9,7392

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4400

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2715

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 446,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1029

PHP

Philippine peso

57,547

RUB

Russian rouble

38,4500

THB

Thai baht

40,112

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3026

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0745

INR

Indian rupee

58,0730

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
### FOR PUBLICATION


### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT



#  T YLERC HASE H ARPER , a minor, by and through his parents Ron and Cheryl Harper; R ON H ARPER ; C HERYL H ARPER , Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.
P OWAY U NIFIED S CHOOL D ISTRICT ; J EFF M ANGUM ; L INDA V ANDERVEEN ; P ENNY R ANFTYLE ; S TEVE M C M ILLAN ; A NDY P ATAPOW , All Individually and No. 04-57037 in their official capacity as Members of the Board of the Poway Unified D.C. No. School District; D ONALD A. P HILLIPS , CV-04-01103-JAH Individually, and in his official Southern District capacity as Superintendent of the of California,



# 
Poway Unified School District; San Diego S COTT F ISHER , Individually and in his ORDER official capacity as Principal of AMENDING Poway High School; L YNELL OPINION A NTRIM , Individually and in her official capacity as Assistant Principal of Poway High School; E D G ILES , Individually and in his official capacity as Vice Principal of Poway High School; D AVID L E M ASTER , Individually and in his official capacity as Teacher of Poway High School; D OES 1

THROUGH 20, I NCLUSIVE ,

Defendants-Appellees. 

# 

5909Filed May 31, 2006

Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Alex Kozinski, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The majority opinion filed April 29, 2006, is hereby amended as follows:

1. At Slip Op. at 4676, footnote 28, at the end of the footnote, add: “We do not exclude, however, the possibility that some verbal assaults on the core characteristics of majority high school students would merit application of the Tinker “intrusion upon the rights of other students ” prong. That question is not presently before us. ”

The dissenting opinion filed April 29, 2006, is hereby amended as follows:

1. At Slip Op. at 4710, footnote 11, between < Id. at 4667.> and < Read broadly, this would protect>, add: “The majority also does not “exclude . . . the possibility that some verbal assaults on the core characteristics of majority high school students would merit application of the Tinker ‘intrusion upon the rights of other students’ prong. ” Id. at ___ n.28.

Appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc is still pending before this court. 5910 H ARPER v. P OWAY U NIFIED S CHOOL D ISTRICTPRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2006 Thomson/West.
# C_2009090EN.01000101.xml

| 18.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/1

---

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 90/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 82, 4.4.2009

OJ C 82, 4.4.2009

Past publications

Past publications

JO C 69 du 21.3.2009

JO C 55 du 7.3.2009

JO C 44 du 21.2.2009

JO C 32 du 7.2.2009

JO C 19 du 24.1.2009

JO C 6 du 10.1.2009

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:09cr50-SPM/AK

STEVEN EUGENE PASSMORE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR SUBPOENA FORMS

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s letter (doc. 23)

requesting the clerk to provide subpoena forms. The request will be denied

because Defendant has not provided any names or addresses of the witnesses. 

Nor has he shown the need for any witness’s presence for an adequate defense.

Defendant has submitted a financial affidavit (doc. 14) showing that he is

indigent and thus unable to pay witness fees and process costs. Under Federal

Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(b), upon application by Defendant the Court will

order subpoenas to be issued with process costs and fees to be paid by the

Government. However, the application must include (1) the name of each

witness, (2) an address for service for each witness, and (3) a description of the

actual knowledge each witness has of facts relevant to the case. Defendant has
Page 2 of 2

not included this information in his request for subpoena forms. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant’s request for subpoena forms (doc. 23) is denied.

2. Defendant may file an application for subpoenas in accordance

with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(b). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of December, 2009.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:09cr50-SPM/AK
# C_2010029EN.01000501.xml

| 5.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 February 2010

2010/C 29/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3847 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4446 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87310 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1330 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4690 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1690 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,120 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7091 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0280 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1250 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0735 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5726 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4701 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7583 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9879 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9597 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 593,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,4779 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,4532 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3210 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 942,49 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7371 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,945 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 41,6850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,806 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5765 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,9700 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,0490 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3847

JPY

Japanese yen

125,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4446

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87310

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1330

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4690

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1690

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,120

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7091

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0280

RON

Romanian leu

4,1250

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0735

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5726

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4701

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7583

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9879

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9597

KRW

South Korean won

1 593,98

ZAR

South African rand

10,4779

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,4532

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3210

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 942,49

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7371

PHP

Philippine peso

63,945

RUB

Russian rouble

41,6850

THB

Thai baht

45,806

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5765

MXN

Mexican peso

17,9700

INR

Indian rupee

64,0490

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JENNIFER XU,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00187-MP-AK

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, DIVISION OF RISK

MANAGEMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 8, Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint by

Board of Trustees of the University of Florida. Defendant moved to dismiss, and Plaintiff filed

an Amended Complaint in response, Doc. 9, which moots the Motion to Dismiss. Defendant is

at liberty to file a pleading responsive to the Amended Complaint or another Motion to Dismiss. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of November, 2009

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-60350 Summary Calendar

STEFAN MOISIUC; LILIANA MOISIUC; RUDOLF MOISIUC, Petitioners,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals USDC No. A72 450 300

- - - - - - - - - - March 27, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Stefan Moisiuc, his wife Liliana, and their son Rudolf, natives and citizens of Romania, have petitioned this court to review a determination by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) that they should be deported. We DENY the Moisiucs’ petition because the record shows that the BIA’s determination is supported by substantial evidence. Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1996).
PETITION DENIED.
#### STATE v. CUMBER

No. 85 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 329.

. Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 May 1977.
#### STATE v. BUCKNER

No. 285 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 629.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 10 September 1979.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
 
                          FOX FAMILY WORLDWIDE, INC.
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE> 
<CAPTION>  
                                                                                  YEAR ENDED           YEAR ENDED
                                                           EIGHT MONTHS         JUNE 30, 1997        JUNE 30, 1998
                                                              ENDED             -------------        -------------
                                                           JUNE 30, 1996            ACTUAL              ACTUAL
                                                           -------------        -------------        -------------
<S>                                                        <C>                  <C>                  <C> 
FIXED CHARGES
  INTEREST EXPENSE, NET OF CAPITALIZED INTEREST                624,000            1,938,000           131,552,000                  
  INTEREST CAPITALIZED DURING THE PERIOD                       471,000            1,923,000             4,328,000
  AMORTIZATION OF DEBT ISSUE COSTS                             261,000              288,000             2,450,000
  PORTION OF RENT EXPENSE CONSIDERED INTEREST                  994,000            1,411,000             3,308,000
                                                           -------------        -------------        ------------
                                                             2,350,000            5,560,000           141,638,000

EARNINGS
  INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES     49,874,000           55,007,000           (21,327,000)
  FIXED CHARGES, LESS CAPITALIZED INTEREST                   1,879,000            3,637,000           137,309,000
                                                          ------------          -------------        ------------
                                                            51,753,000           58,644,000           115,982,000

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                               22.02                10.55                   --

DEFICIENCY OF EARNINGS AVAILABLE TO COVER FIXED CHARGES              0                    0           (25,656,000)                  
</TABLE>
# C_2009037EN.01000501.xml

| 14.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/5

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.5335 — Lufthansa/SN Holding (Brussels Airlines))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 37/02)

On 26 January 2009, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference COMP/M.5335 — Lufthansa/SN Holding (Brussels Airlines), to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---