alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2





Certification of Periodic Report





I,
Merle A. Waterman, Chief Financial Officer of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





| | (1) |  | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated: December 9, 2002





/s/ Merle A. WatermanMerle A. Waterman Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LEAH VALENTINE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:09cv334/MCR/EMT

LEGENDARY MARINE FWB, INC.

and LEGENDARY, INC.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement of this

matter. Therefore, the scheduled pretrial and trial proceedings are hereby cancelled and

the above-entitled action is DISMISSED from the active docket of the court. In the event

that the settlement is not consummated, the Court reserves the power, upon motion filed

by any party within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, to amend or vacate and set

aside this Order of Dismissal and reinstate this case. At this time, the Clerk is directed to

close the file in this case for administrative purposes, and upon the expiration of sixty (60)

days without activity, the Clerk is directed to close the case in its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on this 17th day of February, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER MOORE,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-249-MW/CAS

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

***************************

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND 

RECOMMENDATION

The Court has considered the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation, 

ECF No. 36, filed March 14, 2013. The Court notes that on two previous 

occasions Petitioner was granted extensions of time to file objections to the 

Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation: ECF No. 38 gave Petitioner until 

April 30, 2013, to file objections to the report, and ECF No. 40 granted Petitioner

an extension until June 3, 2013, in which to file his objections. Petitioner has not 

filed objections to the Magistrate’s Report and Recommendation. The Court 

further notes that the Magistrate’s report considered Petitioner’s Reply to the 

State’s Response, ECF No. 20, along with his Amended Reply and exhibits, ECF 

Nos. 33 and 34. Therefore, upon consideration,
2

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The Petitioner’s §2254 petition, 

ECF No. 1, is DENIED. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED, and leave to 

appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.” The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on June 6, 2013.

s/Mark E. Walker

United States District Judge
Case 7:07-cv-03456-KMK-MDF Document 7 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03456-KMK-MDF Document 7 Filed 05/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2010033EN.01000701.xml

| 10.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 33/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 33/7

---

‘Preparatory Action MEDIA International’ — Call for Proposals 2010

2010/C 33/04

1.   Objectives and Description

Objectives and Description

The Preparatory Action MEDIA International is intended to examine and test cooperation activities between European film professionals and professionals of third countries. It covers:

| — | support for training |
| --- | --- |

—

support for training

| — | support for accessing the markets. |
| --- | --- |

—

support for accessing the markets.

Under the work programme for the Preparatory Action MEDIA International for 2010, the Commission hereby invites consortia to submit proposals.

2.   Eligible candidates

Eligible candidates

The call is open to proposals from legal entities in the 27 EU Member States and any third country.

3.   Budget for projects

Budget for projects

The maximum amount available under this call for proposals is EUR 1 million.

The financial support from the Commission cannot exceed 50 %, 75 % or 80 % of the total eligible costs, depending on the nature of the activity.

The financial contribution will be awarded in the form of a grant.

4.   Evaluation and selection

Evaluation and selection

Proposals received will be evaluated by the Commission with the assistance of independent experts. The criteria used in the evaluation are defined in the MEDIA International work programme. Proposals that are successful in the evaluation process will be ranked in terms of quality.

The process for the evaluation of applications for grants awarded by the Commission is set out in the Financial Regulation applicable to the General Budget of the European Union (1).

1

5.   Deadline for submission of applications

Deadline for submission of applications

Applications must be sent at the latest by 31 March 2010 to:

31 March 2010

| Ms Aviva Silver |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for the Information Society and Media |
| Directorate A — Audiovisual, Media and Internet |
| Unit A2 — MEDIA programme and media literacy |
| Office BU33 02/005 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Ms Aviva Silver

European Commission

Directorate-General for the Information Society and Media

Directorate A — Audiovisual, Media and Internet

Unit A2 — MEDIA programme and media literacy

Office BU33 02/005

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

6.   Full details

Full details

The full text of the call for proposals, together with the work programme, guidelines and application forms, can be found at the following Internet address:

http://ec.europa.eu/media

Applications must comply with all the terms of the call for proposals and be submitted on the form provided.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1).

1

---
# C_2012181EN.01020401.xml

| 21.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/204 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/204

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 of 18 December 2008 establishing a long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks’

COM(2012) 21 final — 2012/0013 (COD)

2012/C 181/40

On 13 March 2012 the European Parliament and on 22 February 2012 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 of 18 December 2008 establishing a long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1342/2008 of 18 December 2008 establishing a long-term plan for cod stocks and the fisheries exploiting those stocks

COM(2012) 21 final — 2012/0013 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 479th plenary session of 28 and 29 March 2012 (meeting of 28 March 2012), by 158 votes to 2 with 10 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 28 March 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002 **

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                MICHAEL                D. FELDMANMichael                D. FeldmanChairman,                Chief Executive Officer                                  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | /s/                  JEROME                  I. FELDMANJerome                I. FeldmanVice                Chairman, Chief Financial Officer,                Treasurer |

----
Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 17 Filed 04/06/10 Page 1 of 8Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 17 Filed 04/06/10 Page 2 of 8Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 17 Filed 04/06/10 Page 3 of 8Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 17 Filed 04/06/10 Page 4 of 8Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 17 Filed 04/06/10 Page 5 of 8Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 17 Filed 04/06/10 Page 6 of 8Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 17 Filed 04/06/10 Page 7 of 8Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 17 Filed 04/06/10 Page 8 of 8
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

EN/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ERICK ESTUARDO AJANELSANCHEZ; et al.,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71385

Agency Nos. A073-219-305

A076-674-012

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 15, 2009** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Erick Estuardo Ajanel-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from

an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum and

FILED

JAN 05 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
EN/Research 2 07-71385

withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review for substantial evidence. Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1244 (9th Cir. 2000). 

We deny the petition for review.

We conclude that the IJ’s nexus determination is not supported by

substantial evidence because the guerillas threatened to kill Ajanel-Sanchez based

on their belief that he supported the military. See Navas v. INS, 217 F.3d 646, 656-

57 (9th Cir. 2000). 

Even assuming Ajanel-Sanchez suffered past persecution, his presumption

of well-founded fear is rebutted by changed country conditions. See

Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 997-98 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Accordingly, Ajanel-Sanchez’s asylum and withholding of removal claims fail.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

     We hereby consent to the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the
year ended December 31, 1999, for EEX Corporation in accordance with the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  We consent to the
inclusion in such Annual Report of our reserve reports incorporated therein,
references to our name in the form and context in which they appear, and the
incorporation by reference thereof into the company's Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (Nos. 333-24595, 333-41979 and 333-81203) and on Form S-3
(No. 333-64427).

                           NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


                           By:  /s/ Frederic D. Sewell
                              --------------------------------
                              Frederick D. Sewell
                              President


Dallas, Texas
March 13, 2000
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANTHONY SIKORA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv160-RH/WCS

A. SCOTT et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 14. No objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “This case is DISMISSED without

prejudice.” The clerk must close the file. 

SO ORDERED on September 21, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Keystone
Consolidated Industries, Inc.'s consolidated financial statements for the nine
months ended September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,751
<ALLOWANCES>                                       956
<INVENTORY>                                     29,671
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,538
<PP&E>                                         254,608
<DEPRECIATION>                                 168,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 283,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,054
<BONDS>                                         17,852
<COMMON>                                         9,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,100
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,183
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   283,089
<SALES>                                        252,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               253,158
<CGS>                                          232,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  232,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    42
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    784
<INCOME-TAX>                                       319
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                465
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOSEPH J. CABRAL,

Petitioner,

v. 3:10cv239-WS/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

May 31, 2012. See Doc. 29. The magistrate judge recommends that the petitioner's

petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Despite having been granted two

extensions of time to file objections, the petitioner has filed no objections to the report

and recommendation.

This court having reviewed the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, it

is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 29) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DENIED."

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Case 3:10-cv-00239-WS-EMT Document 38 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of September , 2012.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cv239-WS

Case 3:10-cv-00239-WS-EMT Document 38 Filed 09/04/12 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

BOBBY E. SOLOMON, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00183-MP-MD

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated October 18, 2011. (Doc. 30). The parties have been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has

passed, and none have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. The final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security to deny disability

insurance benefits after August 16, 2005 is AFFIRMED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of November, 2012

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| October      30, 2009 |    /s/ Douglas      Polinsky     |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                  | Douglas      Polinsky                           |
|                  | Chief      Executive Officer                    |
|                  |                                            |
|                  |                                            |
| October      30, 2009 |    /s/ Joseph A. Geraci,      II |
|                  | Joseph      A. Geraci, II                       |
|                  | Chief      Financial Officer                    |

----
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOHNNY W. STELL,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv55/LAC/EMT

SGT. ANDERSON, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On April 12, 2010, this court

entered an order giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to file an amended complaint (Doc. 10). 

Plaintiff failed to respond to the order; therefore, on May 24, 2010, the court issued an order

requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty (20) days, why this action should not be dismissed

for failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc. 14). The time for compliance with the show

cause order has now elapsed with no response from Plaintiff.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 17th day of June 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:10cv55/LAC/EMT