alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010004EN.01000101.xml

| 8.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 January 2010

2010/C 4/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4304 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4411 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89960 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2120 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4832 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1980 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,370 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 270,30 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1225 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1731 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1195 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5611 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4789 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0930 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9536 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9993 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 623,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,5883 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7663 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2915 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 265,41 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8225 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,559 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,6175 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,439 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4969 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,2993 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,3800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4304

JPY

Japanese yen

133,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4411

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89960

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2120

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4832

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1980

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,370

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

270,30

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1225

RON

Romanian leu

4,1731

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1195

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5611

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4789

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0930

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9536

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9993

KRW

South Korean won

1 623,50

ZAR

South African rand

10,5883

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7663

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2915

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 265,41

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8225

PHP

Philippine peso

65,559

RUB

Russian rouble

42,6175

THB

Thai baht

47,439

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4969

MXN

Mexican peso

18,2993

INR

Indian rupee

65,3800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2489 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for financial 

assistance for supportive services for very low-income veteran families 

in permanent housing, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2019 

Ms. HIRONO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for financial assistance for supportive services for 

very low-income veteran families in permanent housing, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping Our Commit5 ment to Ending Veteran Homelessness Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2489 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR FINANCIAL ASSIST2 ANCE FOR SUPPORTIVE SERVICES FOR VERY 

3 LOW-INCOME VETERAN FAMILIES IN PERMA4 NENT HOUSING. 

5 Section 2044(e)(1)(G) of title 38, United States 

6 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal year 2019’’ and in7 serting ‘‘each of fiscal years 2019 through 2021’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2010256EN.01000401.xml

| 23.9.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/4

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2010/C 256/04

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Finland

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Finland

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country: Finland

Subject of commemoration: Currency Decree of 1860 granting Finland the right to issue banknotes and coins

Description of the design: The design shows on the left side a stylised lion figure from the coat of arms of Finland and the year ‘2010’. On the right side, the mintmark and a set of numbers symbolising coin values. At the bottom, the indication of the issuing country reference ‘FI’.

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued: 1,6 million

Date of issue: October 2010

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 40533 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
DIEGO LUMBRERAS

- RAMIREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12

- CR

- 160

- 1

Before PRADO, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Diego Lumbreras

Ramirez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lumbreras

- Ramirez filed a responsive letter raising an issue and alternatively asking for an extension of time to file a response. We granted him an extension, but he did not file an additional brief. We have

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 16, 2014 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-40533 Document: 00512598085 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2014No. 13

- 40533
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflec ted therein , together with Lumbreras

- Ramirez’s letter. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from furthe r responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

2 Case: 13-40533 Document: 00512598085 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2014
Case 3:10-mc-00055-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 07/06/10 Page 1 of 8
Case 3:10-mc-00055-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 07/06/10 Page 2 of 8
Case 3:10-mc-00055-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 07/06/10 Page 3 of 8
Case 3:10-mc-00055-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 07/06/10 Page 4 of 8
Case 3:10-mc-00055-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 07/06/10 Page 5 of 8
Case 3:10-mc-00055-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 07/06/10 Page 6 of 8
Case 3:10-mc-00055-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 07/06/10 Page 7 of 8
Case 3:10-mc-00055-MCR-EMT Document 1 Filed 07/06/10 Page 8 of 8
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATIONS I, Boyd V. Applegate, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Porfavor, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  August 19, 2009     By: /s/ Boyd V. Applegate Boyd V. Applegate CEO, President, Director
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RALPH WALTER BROWN, et al.,

Plaintiffs, 

v.

HON. BOBBY HADDOCK, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No.: 5:10-cv-130-RS

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE

COME NOW Plaintiffs RALPH BROWN and APRIL WORKS, by and 

through the undersigned attorney, and ask the Court as follows:

A. To exclude from evidence, testimony, and argument:

1. An accidental firearm discharge that injured a family member.

2. Plaintiff Brown’s child support arrearages.

3. Plaintiff Works’ job evaluations.

4. Conflicts between Plaintiff Works’ sister Paula and other family 

members prior to Ms. Works arrival and of which she was unaware.

5. Plaintiff Works job-related disputes with co-workers.

6. Plaintiff Works criminal complaint that was not prosecuted.

7. Proceedings against Plaintiff Works law enforcement certification.

8. Plaintiff Works’ separation and divorce.

9. Plaintiffs’ failure to seek psychiatric counseling.

Case 5:10-cv-00130-RS-GRJ Document 37 Filed 05/02/11 Page 1 of 3
2

B. Plaintiffs ask the Court to permit the following matters in evidence, 

testimony, and argument:

1. In the second phase of the trial, if liability is found as to the 

individual defendants, the knowledge of the Sheriff as to other 

wrongful uses of force by the individual defendants.

Plaintiffs are concerned that Defendants may raise matters that have little 

probative value but could tend to inflame and confuse a jury and would amount to 

impermissible character evidence.

“A district court is accorded a wide discretion in determining the admissibility 

of evidence under the Federal Rules. Assessing the probative value of [the proffered 

evidence], and weighing any factors counseling against admissibility is a matter first 

for the district court's sound judgment under Rules 401 and 403....” United States v. 

Abel, 469 U.S. 45, 54, 105 S.Ct. 465, 83 L.Ed.2d 450 (1984), cited by Sprint/United 

Management Co. v. Mendelsohn, 552 U.S. 379, 384, 128 S.Ct. 1140, 1145 (2008).

Even where there is some argument for relevance, F.R.Civ.P. 403 requires an 

“on-the-spot balancing of probative value and prejudice.” 1 S. Childress & M. Davis, 

Federal Standards of Review § 4.02, p. 4-16 (3d ed.1999). See Old Chief v. United States, 

519 U.S. 172, 183, n. 7, 117 S.Ct. 644, 136 L.Ed.2d 574 (1997), Sprint/United 

Management Co., supra.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully prays this Honorable Court to grant 

Plaintiffs Motions in Limine as set forth above.

Case 5:10-cv-00130-RS-GRJ Document 37 Filed 05/02/11 Page 2 of 3
3

Respectfully submitted,

s/ James V. Cook_________

JAMES V. COOK, ESQ.

Florida Bar Number 0966843

314 West Jefferson Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32301

(850) 222-8080; 561-0836 fax

I CERTIFY the foregoing was filed electronically on 5/2/2011 and that the person 

noted below is registered to be notified by the CM/ECF electronic mail system:

John W. Jolly, Jr.

Jolly & Peterson, P.A.

Post Office Box 37400

Tallahassee, FL 32315

s/James V. Cook_________________

JAMES V. COOK

Case 5:10-cv-00130-RS-GRJ Document 37 Filed 05/02/11 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ISAAC LITHARIO PETERSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00332-MP -WCS

MICHAEL R MCCOY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 33, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the defendant’s motion to dismiss be denied. The time for

filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. The Court agrees with the Magistrate

Judge that plaintiff does not have three qualifying "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss, doc. 22, is DENIED, as Plaintiff does not have

three "strikes" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the case is REMANDED for

further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of April, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00332-MP-WCS Document 44 Filed 04/22/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009313EN.01000402.xml

| 22.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5556 — JPMC/Schoeller Arca Systems)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 313/03

On 20 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5556. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5556. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geo Point Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William C. Lachmar, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ William C. Lachmar

William C. Lachmar

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LESCARDEN
INC'S NOVEMBER 30, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          24,692
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,832
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,524
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,291,967
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,872
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,265,235)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (2,253,363)
<SALES>                                         27,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,125
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,431
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (147,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (147,306)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (147,306)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2009130EN.01000501.xml

| 9.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/5

---

Call for expressions of interest: independent experts for the safer internet programme (2009-2013)

(Following Article 179a of the Financial Regulation
   (1)
  and Article 265a of the Implementing Rules
   (2))

Following Article 179a of the Financial Regulation

1

and Article 265a of the Implementing Rules

2

2009/C 130/04

Description

Description

The Commission hereby invites applications from individuals wishing to provide expert assistance relating to the Safer Internet programme (3). The Commission will draw up a list of experts who meet the criteria set out below.

3

The objective of the Safer Internet programme is to promote safer use of the internet and other communication technologies, particularly for children, and to fight against illegal content and harmful conduct online.

Further information about the programme can be found on the programme website: http://ec.europa.eu/saferinternet

Tasks

Tasks

The tasks include assistance to the Commission in evaluating proposals submitted in response to calls for proposals, and in reviewing individual Safer Internet projects, as well as legacy projects funded under the Safer Internet plus programme (4).

4

Criteria for inclusion on the list and submission of applications

Criteria for inclusion on the list and submission of applications

All applications must comply with the detailed specifications and conditions which are available on the Commission’s above-mentioned internet site in English.

These include requirements related to nationality, qualifications, experience and language knowledge.

Submission of applications

Submission of applications

Applications must be submitted by means of the online expert registration tool available at the following website: http://ec.europa.eu/saferinternet

Expiry date of the list resulting from the call for expression of interest

Expiry date of the list resulting from the call for expression of interest

The list of experts will be valid until 31 December 2013. Any person interested may submit an application at any time during the period of validity of the list, with the exception of the last three months.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002, 25.6.2002 (OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1).

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002, 23.12.2002 (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 1).

2

(3)  Decision No 1351/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 (OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p. 118).

3

(4)  Decision No 854/2005/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 (OJ L 149, 11.6.2005, p. 1).

4

---
#### STATE v. BLACK

No. 185 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 687.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.