alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MARCUS ISOM, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00177-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL D. CREWS, Secretary,

Florida Department of Corrections, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated March 11, 2013. (Doc. 45). The parties have been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order. 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, (doc. 1)

is DENIED.
Page 2 of 2

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules

Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of June, 2013

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:09-cv-00177-MP-GRJ
#### STATE v. WRENN

No. 106.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 146.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 October 1971.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2424 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2424

To reauthorize the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness 
                  Requires Learning Young Act of 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2019

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the Young Women's Breast Health Education and Awareness 
                  Requires Learning Young Act of 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``EARLY Act Reauthorization of 2019''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE YOUNG WOMEN'S BREAST HEALTH EDUCATION 
              AND AWARENESS REQUIRES LEARNING YOUNG ACT OF 2009.

    Section 399NN(h) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
280m(h)) is amended by striking ``$4,900,000 for each of fiscal years 
2015 through 2019'' and inserting ``$9,000,000 for each of fiscal years 
2020 through 2024''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RED MOUNTAIN BANK, NA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv100/RS-MD

EMERALD COAST CAR WASH, LLC;

LEE A SAGE; ROBERT PARKS; and

UNKNOWN PERSON OR ENTITY,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

ORDER

The Initial Scheduling Order dated July 6, 2010 (Doc. 21) is vacated.

ORDERED on July 6, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 22, 2022

No. 04-22-00494-CR

Brian Everett DAY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-0279-CR-A

Honorable William D. Old III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due on August 15, 2022. On August 16, 2022, court 

reporter D’Lois Jones filed a notification of late record, notifying this court that the reporter’s 

record was not filed because appellant has not provided the reporter a designation of record.

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten 

(10) days of the date of this order that appellant has requested the court reporter to prepare the 

reporter’s record, which request must designate the portions of the proceedings and the exhibits 

to be included. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b)(1).

It is further ORDERED that the reporter’s record must be filed no later than thirty (30) 

days after the date appellant’s written proof is filed with this court. If appellant fails to respond 

within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date the 

clerk’s record is filed, and the court will consider only those issues or points raised in appellant’s 

brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

FILE COPY
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of August, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2313 

To authorize 2 additional district judgeships for the district of Colorado. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize 2 additional district judgeships for the district 

of Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGESHIPS FOR THE 

4 DISTRICT OF COLORADO. 

5 (a) ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGESHIPS.—The Presi6 dent shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent 

7 of the Senate, 2 additional district judges for the district 

8 of Colorado. 

9 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

10 The table in section 133(a) of title 28, United States 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2313 IS

1 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to Colorado 

2 and inserting the following: 

‘‘Colorado ........................................................................................ 9’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act, and the amend4 ments made by this Act, shall take effect on January 21, 

5 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2289

ROBERT B. CLARKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, Special Operations Command, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1882-8-08BD) Submitted: February 16, 1999 Decided: March 30, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert B. Clarkson, Appellant Pro Se. Frances Cornelia Trapp, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert B. Clarkson appeals the district court’s orders staying discovery, granting summary judgment to one of two Defendants, and denying Clarkson’s motion for a new trial. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994); 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 546 (1949). Because the district court did not direct entry of final judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) andthe rulings Clarkson would have us review are not otherwise appealable, we lack jurisdiction to entertain the merits of Clarkson’s challenge to the district court’s orders. Accordingly, we dismiss Clarkson’s appeal as interlocutory.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Otter Tail Ag Enterprises, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony Hicks, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  February 20,2009

 
|   | /s/ Anthony Hicks                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Anthony Hicks                                        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 1, 2021

b0524

Order 

Clerk

June 1, 2021

161995 (68)

BRENDA BRADLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 161995

COA: 353627

Kent CC: 20-001193-CH

BETH STRIEGLE and DAVID V. SWANSON,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

SHIRL S. SWANSON,

Defendant,

and

JOSLIN MONAHAN,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 17, 2021 

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration 

of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STEVEN L. BADER,

Appellant,

v.

MARINA BAY APARTMENTS, and JUAN CARLOS MARTINEZ,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-1170

[August 4, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Reginald R. Corlew, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502020SC002632XXXXSB.

Steven L. Bader, Delray Beach, pro se.

No appearance for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a).

CIKLIN, KUNTZ and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RAFAEL A. LLOVERA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv338-SPM/WCS

BROWARD SHERIFF’S OFFICE.

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated September 1, 2010. Doc. 8. Plaintiff has been

furnished a copy and has filed objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). Doc. 9. Despite the objections, I have determined that

the report and recommendation is correct and should be adopted. Plaintiff is

advised that he cannot transfer a case on his own in an attempt to have a

different judge decide it. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 8) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the
Page 2 of 2

Southern District of Florida, Broward Division, for all further proceedings including

review of all pending motions. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of October, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:10cv338-SPM/WCS
#### HILL v. SMITH

No. 199 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 670.

Petition by defendant Smith for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
CAROLINE D. COOK, PLAINTIFF 

## vs.
MICHAEL GAY COOK, DEFENDANT CAUSE NO. Cll5-070 Filed: 12/4/2015 9:32:08 PM Shelli Miller. County Clerk Rockwall County, Texas Angela Endicott

IN THE COUNTY COURT

ATLAW

ROCKWALL COUNTY, TEXAS


### DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL COMES NOW, Michael Gay Cook, Defendant in the above styled cause of action, which he, as appellant, desires to appeal to the 5th 

### District Court ofAppeals. Defendant hereby gives notice ofappeal ofthis court's judgment and files this his Notice of Appeal. Respectfully submitted, Respectfully submitted this the 1st day of December, 2015. Kerry 

### L. Prisock Kerry 

### L. Prisock State Bar Number 24082005 Post Office Box 1051 Rockwall, Texas 75087 Telephone: 214-632-3823 Facsimile: 469-252-7496 kprisocklegal@sbcglobal.net ATIORNEY FOR DEFENDANTCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served upon opposing counsel by electronic means. Kerry L. Prisock Kerry L. Prisock State Bar Number 2408200S Post Office Box 1051 Rockwall, Texas 75087 Telephone: 214-632-3823 Facsimile: 469-252·7496 kprisocklegal@sbcglobal.net 

### ATIORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

### C.\RUUl\1: 

# r>. coor.;.. Pl.:\ l'.;Tl Ff 

### \'S.
\'11CI J.\l:L. (j,\ 

### Y COOK. DF I Tl\ Di\t\ I



## s 1..\l L 01" l"FXA-.. 

### CUL7\ IYO!· Rt >CK\\ ·\I L C\l**~I** 

### '' 

### >. ( It 'i-\170

### !'\ I IH· Cul'!' l Y CUL RI

R Ul. 

### I'.\\ \I l ( I 1 

### t \ I Y

. I 

### 1-\. \ "i

### Lkt\.irt: m.:,**th~ 1111dcr:.i~11\·d** **,nHhllril~.** 

### nn thi'**d;:~** 

### p<.:r"•n;iJ!, .1r'p

... -;m;d**\11~:ha..:l** l1::t.\ C11ok. 

### "hl' uftl'r**\-l~in~** .!t1.

### -~~irn:-oil)1:ub**~1•1k~** tl1i: 

### ll•r<:h!•'i1ii; s1:1tl.'m..:nh

### ;ir~· 1q1h111

### Iii~ 11r 

### h..:r**p<r~un1il**

### lo.no\\~1:·.~1.d-'f~:_:~~L't Sl HS( RIULL> .\\D "\\ (IR'-: 11• 

## this 4th di!> 11t

### D1:1.:1:111~1~Ol5

,,**~** . ·'

## \~-**-R;;hi~** St.11..- 111 

### I 

# ,.,.1.., . I 

### f

..... 

# _ .....
# C_2009021EN.01000901.xml

| 28.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 January 2009

(2009/C 21/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3174 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4527 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,9352 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5375 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5017 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8975 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,638 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 285,32 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,703 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,354 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,238 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1377 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9884 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,619 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,222 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4922 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,98 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 830,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1772 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0084 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3608 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 919,56 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7762 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,58 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,535 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,971 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0462 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,5095 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,256 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3174

JPY

Japanese yen

117,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4527

GBP

Pound sterling

0,9352

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5375

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5017

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8975

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,638

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

285,32

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,703

PLN

Polish zloty

4,354

RON

Romanian leu

4,238

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1377

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9884

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,619

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,222

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4922

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,98

KRW

South Korean won

1 830,92

ZAR

South African rand

13,1772

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0084

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3608

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 919,56

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7762

PHP

Philippine peso

61,58

RUB

Russian rouble

43,535

THB

Thai baht

45,971

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0462

MXN

Mexican peso

18,5095

INR

Indian rupee

64,256

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Medical Institute Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dilip
Shrestha, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies in all material reports with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Dilip ShresthaDilip
      ShresthaChief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      November 13, 2009
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lee Costerd, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wolverine
      Exploration Inc. for the period ended February 28, 2010 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Wolverine Exploration Inc.                                                                    

Dated: April 14, 2010



| | /s/
      Lee Costerd                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Lee Costerd                                                         
| | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
      Officer and Director 
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)
| | Wolverine Exploration Inc.                                          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Wolverine
Exploration Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Exploration Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
Exhibit 4.2

 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated April 7, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2007 contained in Amendment
No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-236188) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.




	 	/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP






 


Chicago, Illinois


April 7, 2020
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BRENT A. ZELLERS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10cv340-SPM-WCS

FLORIDA PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 7). The Parties have been furnished copies and have

been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the

Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 7) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-ninth day of June, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00340-SPM-WCS Document 8 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 1