alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 4 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 5 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 6 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 7 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 8 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 9 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 10 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 11 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 12 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 13 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 14 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 15 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 16 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 17 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 18 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 19 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 20 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 21 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 22 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 23 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 24 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 25 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 26 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 27 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 28 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 29 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 30 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 31 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 32 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 33 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 34 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 35 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 36 of 37
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-46 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 37 of 37
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Lawrence Chimerine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that the Annual Report of First Transaction
Management, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of First Transaction Management, Inc.




/s/
      Lawrence ChimerineLawrence
      ChimerinePresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerFirst Transaction Management,
      Inc.





Date:
March 31, 2010
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Astro Aerospace Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce Bent, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/Bruce Bent Bruce Bent Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer  July 2, 2020
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CARLOS ALMEIDA, 

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv4-SPM/WCS

LAWRENCE REEL, Warden, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an order filed January 8,

2010, Plaintiff was directed to either (1) file a supplement to his motion for leave to file in

forma pauperis, or (2) pay the $350.00 filing fee, or (3) file a notice of voluntary dismissal

of this action by February 9, 2010. Plaintiff was specifically warned that a

recommendation would be made that this case be dismissed if he failed to comply with

that order. Doc. 2. To date, no response has been received from the Plaintiff. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:10cv4-SPM/WCS

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, his complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

The Plaintiff shall have a 15 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for his failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on February 24, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14

days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections

limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.
# C_2010208EN.01000301.xml

| 31.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5876 — Turmed/RACC/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 208/02

On 20 July 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in Spanish language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5876. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5876. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Order filed October 27, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00711-CV

____________

OTIS BYRD, JR., Appellant

V.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, Appellee

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 11-CCV-044560

O R D E R

Appellant=s brief was due October 10, 2011. No brief or motion for extension of 

time has been filed. 

Unless appellant submits his brief, and a motion reasonably explaining why the 

brief was late, to the Clerk of this Court on or before November 28, 2011, the Court will 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 18      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 1 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 18      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 2 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 18      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 3 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 18      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 4 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 18      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 5 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB     Document 18      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 6 of 6
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Edward Hebert, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Saratoga Resources, Inc. on Form 10-K/A No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A No. 1 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Saratoga Resources, Inc.





| |        |                         
| | ------ | ------------------------
| | By:    | /s/ Edward Hebert       
| | Name:  | Edward Hebert           
| | Title: | Vice President  Finance
| | Dated: | May 20, 2009
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 248 

To ensure that the Secretary of the Interior collaborates fully with State 

and local authorities and certain nonprofit entities in managing the 

Corolla Wild Horse population on Federal land. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2019 

Mr. TILLIS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To ensure that the Secretary of the Interior collaborates 

fully with State and local authorities and certain nonprofit entities in managing the Corolla Wild Horse population on Federal land. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WILD HORSES IN AND AROUND THE CURRI4 TUCK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE. 

5 (a) GENETIC DIVERSITY.—The Secretary of the Inte6 rior (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’), in con7 sultation with the North Carolina Department of Environ8 ment and Natural Resources, Currituck County, North 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 248 IS

1 Carolina, and the Corolla Wild Horse Fund, shall allow 

2 for the introduction of a small number of free-roaming 

3 wild horses from the Cape Lookout National Seashore as 

4 necessary to ensure the genetic diversity of the wild horse 

5 population in and around the Currituck National Wildlife 

6 Refuge, consistent with— 

7 (1) the laws (including regulations) applicable 

8 to the Currituck National Wildlife Refuge and the 

9 Cape Lookout National Seashore; and 

10 (2) the December 2014 Wild Horse Manage11 ment Agreement approved by the United States Fish 

12 and Wildlife Service, the North Carolina Depart13 ment of Environment and Natural Resources, 

14 Currituck County, North Carolina, and the Corolla 

15 Wild Horse Fund. 

16 (b) AGREEMENT.— 

17 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may enter 

18 into an agreement with the Corolla Wild Horse 

19 Fund to provide for the cost-effective management 

20 of the horses in and around the Currituck National 

21 Wildlife Refuge while ensuring that natural re22 sources within the Currituck National Wildlife Ref23 uge are not adversely impacted. 

24 (2) REQUIREMENTS.—The agreement entered 

25 into under paragraph (1) shall specify that the CoVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:29 Feb 01, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S248.IS S248

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 248 IS

1 rolla Wild Horse Fund shall pay the costs associated 

2 with, with respect to the horses in and around the 

3 Currituck National Wildlife Refuge— 

4 (A) coordinating and conducting a periodic 

5 census, and inspecting the health, of the horses; 

6 (B) maintaining records of the horses liv7 ing in the wild and in confinement; 

8 (C) coordinating and conducting the re9 moval and placement of horses and monitoring 

10 of any horses removed from the Currituck 

11 County Outer Banks; and 

12 (D) administering a viable population con13 trol plan for the horses, including auctions, 

14 adoptions, contraceptive fertility methods, and 

15 other viable options. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SAMUEL MOTT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00178-MP-WCS

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 20, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the Court grant the Defendant's motion (Doc. 18) to

remand the matter to the Commissioner for reconsideration of the unfavorable portion of the

ALJ's decision. The Plaintiff had filed a response to Doc. 18, in which Plaintiff agreed to the

remand, but more fully explained the parties' agreement as to the effect of the remand. Doc. 19. 

That is, both the Plaintiff and the Defendant request that this court enter a final judgment

pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure reversing the decision of the ALJ as

it pertains to the time period September 22, 2004 through May 17, 2006, affirming the decision

as to Mr. Mott’s ongoing receipt of benefits after May 18, 2006, and remanding this case to the 
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:09-cv-00178-MP-WCS

Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for reconsideration of the time period

September 22, 2004 through May 17, 2006.

Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is adopted and incorporated herein.

The motion to remand, Doc. 18, is granted. 

The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure REVERSING the ALJ’s decision as it pertains to the time period

September 22, 2004 thru May 17, 2006, and AFFIRMING the decision as to Plaintiff’s

disability as of May 18, 2006, and REMANDING this case to the Commissioner under

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand the ALJ shall follow the instructions

set forth in the Defendant’s Memorandum in Support of his Motion to Remand for the

time period September 22, 2004 thru May 17, 2006. 

Pursuant to Bergen v. Commissioner, 454 F.3d 1273, 1277-78 (11th Cir. 2006),

proceedings on attorney fees under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) are stayed

until the matter is fully adjudicated upon remand. The Plaintiff shall file a motion to

award fees under 406(b) within 30 days after counsel receives notice from the Defendant

Commissioner as to Plaintiff’s past due benefits.

This stay relates only to attorney fee proceedings under § 406(b) of the Social Security

Act, not to attorney fee proceedings under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §

2412, the latter of which may be adjudicated at this time.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of August, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Exhibit 10.1


 


EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO


EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS, Nabors Industries
Ltd. and Nabors Industries, Inc. (collectively, the “Company”) and Anthony G. Petrello (“Executive”), entered
into an Executive Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) effective as of January 1, 2013 and amended effective as of
January 1, 2015, (the “First Amendment”), July 1, 2015 (the “Second Amendment’), January 1, 2016 (the “Third
Amendment”), July 1, 2016 (the Fourth Amendment”), October 15, 2018 (the “Fifth Amendment”), December 31,
2018 (the “Sixth Amendment”), and January 2, 2020 (the “Seventh Amendment”); and


 


WHEREAS, the Executive
and the Company have agreed to certain other modifications to the Agreement which they now desire to memorialize effective with
this amendment (this “Amendment”) as follows:


 


1.       Section
3.1(a) of the Agreement is amended by adding after the first sentence: “However, on an interim basis as set forth herein
the amount of base salary due and payable for purposes of biweekly payroll administration only shall be based on a salary, determined
on an annualized basis, as set forth below:


 


(a)       For
the period commencing on the first payroll period of fiscal 2020 and ending on March 22, 2020, an amount equal to ninety percent
(90%) of Base Salary;


 


(b)       For
the payroll period commencing on March 23, 2020 and ending on April 5, 2020, an amount equal to eighty percent (80%) of Base Salary;


 


(c)       For
the two (2) payroll periods commencing on April 6, 2020 and ending on May 3, 2020, an amount equal to fifty percent (50%) of the
amount calculated in accordance with clause (b) above; and


 


(d)       For
the payroll period commencing on May 4, 2020 and ending at the end of the last payroll period of fiscal 2020, an amount equal to
ninety percent (90%) of the amount calculated in accordance with clause (b) above.


 


Notwithstanding the foregoing, for all
other purposes under this Agreement, the term “Base Salary” or “base salary” shall be construed in accordance
with the first sentence of this Section 3.1(a) as if the preceding section’s modification had not occurred.”


 


2.       This
Amendment supersedes and replaces in its entirety the Seventh Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement, dated as of January
2, 2020, by and among the parties hereto. Except as amended pursuant to this Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and
effect. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but which taken together
shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


 









     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
executed this Amendment effective as of April 6, 2020.


 


	 	COMPANY:
	 	 	 
	 	Nabors Industries Ltd.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/Mark
    D. Andrews
	 	 	Its Corporate Secretary
	 	 	 
	 	Nabors Industries, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/Michael
    Rasmuson
	 	 	Its Senior Vice President
    and General Counsel



 


	 	EXECUTIVE:
	 	 
	 	/s/Anthony
    G. Petrello
	 	Anthony G. Petrello
Amendment to the Purchase Agreement
       by and between Eternal Technologies Group Limited (and Shang Jai Ji

         This amendment made on this 4th day of May 2003, but effective as of
July 15, 2000 by and between Eternal Technologies Group Ltd. (hereinafter
"Eternal") and Shang Jai Ji (hereinafter "Shang").

         WHEREAS, on July 15, 2000, Eternal and Shang exectued an agreement
whereby Eternal purchased 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Willsley
Company Limited, and ;

         WHEREAS, the purchase price for such interest was US$47,108,346;

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to modify this agreement to restate the
purchase price.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of $1.00 and other good and
valuable consideration, the adequacy of which is hereinafter stated, the parties
agree as follows:

1.       Article 1 of the Areement, dated July 15, 2000, is hereby amended by
         substituting the sum of US$6,000,000 for the sum of US$47,108,346.

2.       All other terms and conditions as spelled out in the Agreement dated
         July 15, 2000 shall remain in full force and effect unless amended by
         in working and signed by both parties hereto.

3.       This amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with the
         laws of Hong Kong.

In witness here the parties have executed this agreement on this 4th day of May
2003.

                                           Eternal Technologies Group Limited


                                          /s/ Shang Jai Ji
                                          -----------------------------------
By:___________________________                Shang Jai Ji
Its:Chairman
                                          Date: May 4, 2003
Date: May 4, 2003
# C_2009111EN.01000501.xml

| 15.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 May 2009

2009/C 111/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3563 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,41 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4477 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89810 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7710 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5053 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8320 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,940 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 289,73 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4875 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1945 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1431 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8115 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5971 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5116 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3066 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9891 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 713,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,7049 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2567 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3593 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 092,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8115 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,706 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,7155 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,908 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8759 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0502 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,4220 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3563

JPY

Japanese yen

129,41

DKK

Danish krone

7,4477

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89810

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7710

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5053

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8320

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,940

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

289,73

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4875

RON

Romanian leu

4,1945

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1431

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8115

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5971

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5116

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3066

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9891

KRW

South Korean won

1 713,23

ZAR

South African rand

11,7049

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2567

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3593

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 092,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8115

PHP

Philippine peso

64,706

RUB

Russian rouble

43,7155

THB

Thai baht

46,908

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8759

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0502

INR

Indian rupee

67,4220

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---