alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009224EN.01000202.xml

| 17.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5180 — Manitowoc/Enodis)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 224/04

On 19 September 2008, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32008M5180. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32008M5180. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CEO CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Ronald J. Buschur, Chief Executive Officer of Powerwave
Technologies, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 28, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 2, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ RONALD J. BUSCHUR                
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Ronald J. Buschur                    
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |  |  |     |  | Powerwave Technologies, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
          THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
          THE ACCOMPANYING CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
          QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
          NOTE - EARNINGS PER SHARE DATA HAS BEEN RESTATED TO COMPLY WITH THE
          ADOPTION OF SFAS 128.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                      18,825,764
<SECURITIES>                                 6,039,255
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,844,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                   909,501
<INVENTORY>                                     18,880
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,976,716
<PP&E>                                       2,692,778
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,675,749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,089,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,580,737
<BONDS>                                         24,611
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,974
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,095,278
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,089,960
<SALES>                                     10,254,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,308,612
<CGS>                                        1,098,434
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,966,351
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,923,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             403,989
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,581,086)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (322,824)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,854,273)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,854,273)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.53)
        


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. HOLLAND

No. 118 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 750.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 February 1978.
EXHIBIT 4.99
 
 CESSION AGREEMENT


th
          th
       L-


New-KBH.kbh -loan cession
           1.2.
     1.2.1.  1.2.2.  1.2.3.  1.2.4. 1.2.5. 1.2.6.  1.2.7.
 words indicating the singular includes the plural and vice versa;  words indicating a gender include any gender;  an expression indicating a natural person includes any company, partnership, trust, joint venture,
  a reference to a statute, regulation, proclamation, ordinance or by-law includes all statutes, regulations,
   a reference to a document includes all amendments or supplements to, or replacements or novations of
  any reference in this Agreement to "date of signature hereof" shall be read as meaning a reference to
  any reference to an enactment is to that enactment as at the date of signature hereof and as amended or


New-KBH.kbh - loan cession
                           eiusdem generis
        BACKGROUND AND RECORDAL


New-KBH.kbh - loan cession
      CESSION OF LOAN
          PURCHASE CONSIDERATION
           SUSPENSIVE CONDITION
      CLOSING AND IMPLEMENTATION
           WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS BY DRDGOLD


New-KBH.kbh -loan cession
      
                           estoppel


New-KBH.kbh -loan cession
      DOMICILIUM CITANDI ET EXECUTANDI
  domicilia citandi et executandi


New-KBH.kbh -loan cession
   10.6.3
  10.6.4.
  10.6.5.
                   11. NO CESSION ORASSIGNMENT


New-KBH.kbh - loan cession
   COSTS
    DATE  18 November 2005 18 November 2005
      WITNESS
   
  
  Chief Financial Officer For: DRDGOLD
   
  
 Director
  
 - 9 -
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-40095

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ANTONIO IRUEGAS-VALDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

No. 2:11-CR-784-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Iruegas-Valdez appeals the sentence imposed after his guilty-plea

conviction of illegal reentry into the United States after deportation. He argues

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 26, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-40095 Document: 00512062100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/26/2012
No. 12-40095

that the sentence was procedurally and substantively unreasonable because the

district court imposed a supervised-release term without explanation, notwithstanding that U.S.S.G. § 5D1.1(c) says that supervised release should not ordinarily be imposed on a deportable alien. Iruegas-Valdez also asserts that the

district court did not give notice of its intent to depart from the guidelines’ advice

concerning supervised release and that the sentence is substantively unreasonable because the court did not account for a factor that should have received significant weightSSthe recommendation in § 5D1.1(c) against imposing supervised

release on deportable aliens. As Iruegas-Valdez concedes, review is limited to

plain error, because he did not raise these arguments in the district court. See

Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009).

The court did not plainly err in imposing a term of supervised release.

Because that term was within the statutory and guidelines range for the offense

of conviction, it was not a departure, so no notice was required. See United

States v. Dominguez-Alvarado, 695 F.3d 324 (5th Cir. 2012). The court adopted

the presentence report (“PSR”), which cited the current version of § 5D1.1(c) and

listed Iruegas-Valdez’s extensive criminal history and substance-abuse problems. See United States v. Ollison, 555 F.3d 152, 164 (5th Cir. 2009). The court

denied Iruegas-Valdez’s request for a downward departure, noting that he had

an extensive criminal history; that the sentence was sufficient but not greater

than necessary; and that the sentence was warranted based on the advisory

guidelines and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. The reasons for the sentence

based on the PSR and the § 3553(a) factors were sufficient to support the supervised-release term. See Dominguez-Alvarado, 695 F.3d at 330. 

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-40095 Document: 00512062100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/26/2012
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KOVACHERICH J. ARNOLD,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:10cv204-WS

STATE OF FLORIDA,

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 74)

docketed October 21, 2011. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's 

motion to vacate judgment and set aside the parties' settlement agreement be denied. 

The plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 75) to the report and recommendation.

Having reviewed the record, the court finds that the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 74) is ADOPTED

and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The plaintiff's motion (doc. 56) to set aside judgment and set aside the parties'

settlement agreement is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of December , 2011.

Case 4:10-cv-00204-WS-WCS Document 76 Filed 12/22/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 4:10cv204-WS

Case 4:10-cv-00204-WS-WCS Document 76 Filed 12/22/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009203EN.01000501.xml

| 28.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 August 2009

2009/C 203/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4268 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4436 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88040 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1615 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5234 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6440 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,406 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7035 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1125 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2230 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1431 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7101 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5598 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0590 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0902 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0598 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 780,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2020 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7479 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3230 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 506,97 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0416 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,734 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,1935 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,547 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6493 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7530 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,7920 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4268

JPY

Japanese yen

133,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4436

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88040

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1615

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5234

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6440

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,406

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7035

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1125

RON

Romanian leu

4,2230

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1431

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7101

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5598

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0590

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0902

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0598

KRW

South Korean won

1 780,15

ZAR

South African rand

11,2020

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7479

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3230

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 506,97

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0416

PHP

Philippine peso

69,734

RUB

Russian rouble

45,1935

THB

Thai baht

48,547

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6493

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7530

INR

Indian rupee

69,7920

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### STATE v. GOODE

No. 33 PC.

No. 128 (Spring Term 1980).

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 498.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 1 April 1980. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 1 April 1980.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Globe Telecom, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gerardo
C. Ablaza, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that to the best of my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
     the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 28, 2003
                                         /s/ Gerardo C. Ablaza, Jr.
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Gerardo C. Ablaza, Jr.
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO GLOBE TELECOM, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY GLOBE TELECOM, INC. AND
FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globotek Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vladislav Feliksovich Tenenbaum, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.








Date: November 15, 2010
By:
//s/Vladislav Feliksovich TenenbaumVladislav Feliksovich TenenbaumPresident (Principal Executive Officer)
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JAMES HARMON, III,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO. 1:09CV189-MMP/AK

MARTHA HUMPHRIES,

Respondent.

 /

ORDER

This cause is before the Court on Petitioner’s motion for extension of time to submit the

filing fee. Doc. 6. The filing fee has been paid, Doc. 5, and therefore, the instant motion is

MOOT.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of October, 2009.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
# C_2010113EN.01000101.xml

| 1.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/1

---

2010/C 113/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 100, 17.4.2010

OJ C 100, 17.4.2010

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 80, 27.3.2010

OJ C 63, 13.3.2010

OJ C 51, 27.2.2010

OJ C 37, 13.2.2010

OJ C 24, 30.1.2010

OJ C 11, 16.1.2010

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enox Biopharma, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, as
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: May 17, 2010                          By: /s/ Prof. Yossef Av-Gay
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32



The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No.
33-8238. These certifications shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.



Certification of Chief Executive Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Infonet Services Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended April 2, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Dated: June 16, 2004



/s/    JOSÉ A.
COLLAZOJosé A. Collazo Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infonet Services Corporation and will be retained by Infonet Services Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Infonet Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended April 2, 2004 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: June 16, 2004



/s/    AKBAR H.
FIRDOSYAkbar H. Firdosy Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Infonet Services Corporation and will be retained by Infonet Services Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE v. SOUHRADA

No. 536P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 710.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 October 1982.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States; Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure will hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to the public for observation but not participation.

# DATES:

January 14-15, 2008.

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

# ADDRESSES:

United States Court of Appeals, Richard H. Chambers Court of Appeals Building, Pasadena Mezzanine, 125 South Grand Avenue, Pasadena, CA 91105-1621.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John K. Rabiej, Chief, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: October 22, 2007.

John K. Rabiej, 

Chief, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 07-5419 Filed 10-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M