alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.02

 Exhibit 4.02
 

 FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT
 

 FIRST AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) dated as of August 27, 2014, amending the Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of June 20, 2014 (the “Agreement”), between Trans-Lux Corporation (the “Company”) and George W. Schiele (“Schiele”).  All terms used herein and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.
 

 W I T N E S S E T H :
 

 WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend the Agreement, as set forth herein.
 

 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
 

 SECTION 1.  Amendments.  The Agreement shall be hereby amended by adding a new paragraph (c) to Section 2.02 contained therein, as follows:
 

 “(c)
 Within 90 days of the Closing, the Company shall make a cash payment to the Investor in the amount of $876.71, which such amount represents the amount of interest due to Investor under the Note.”
 

 SECTION 2.  Definitions; References. Unless otherwise specifically defined herein, each capitalized term used herein which is defined in the Agreement shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the Agreement.  Each reference to “hereof”, “hereunder”, “herein” and “hereby” and each other similar reference and each reference to “this Agreement” and each other similar reference contained in the Agreement shall, from and after the date hereof, refer to the Agreement as amended by this Amendment.
  
 SECTION 3. No Other Changes.  Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
 

 SECTION 4.  Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law thereof.
 

 SECTION 5.  Counterparts; Effectiveness.  This Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.  This Amendment shall become effective as of the date first written above when duly executed below.
 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their respective authorized officers as of the day and year first above written.
 

 TRANS-LUX CORPORATION
 

 By:
 /s/ J.M. Allain
       
 Name:
 J.M. Allain
      
 Title:
 President and CEO
 

 GEORGE W. SCHIELE, an individual
 

 /s/ George W. Schiele
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of League Now Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, John Bianco, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ John Bianco


John Bianco


Chief Executive Officer


August 13, 2012





A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2029 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2029

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
       Indian coal production tax credit, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2019

  Mr. Daines introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 
       Indian coal production tax credit, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INDIAN COAL PRODUCTION TAX CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 45(e)(10) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``the applicable 
        dollar amount per ton of Indian coal'' and all that follows and 
        inserting the following: ``$4.00 per ton of Indian coal--
                            ``(i) produced by the taxpayer at an Indian 
                        coal production facility, and
                            ``(ii) sold (either directly by the 
                        taxpayer or after sale or transfer to one or 
                        more related persons) to an unrelated person 
                        during such taxable year.'', and
            (2) by striking subparagraph (B) and inserting the 
        following:
                    ``(B) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any 
                calendar year after 2018, the dollar amount in 
                subparagraph (A) shall be equal to the product of such 
                dollar amount and the inflation adjustment factor 
                determined under paragraph (2)(B) for the calendar 
                year, except that such paragraph shall be applied by 
                substituting `2017' for `1992'.''.
    (b) Definition of Indian Coal.--Subparagraph (A) of section 
45(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as 
follows:
                    ``(A) In general.--The term `Indian coal' means 
                coal which is produced from coal reserves which are--
                            ``(i) owned or controlled by an Indian 
                        tribe,
                            ``(ii) owned or controlled by an enrolled 
                        member of an Indian tribe, or
                            ``(iii) held in trust by the United States 
                        for the benefit of an Indian tribe or its 
                        members.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to coal produced and sold after January 1, 2018.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009026EN.01000902.xml

| 3.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/9

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5310 — Jysk Stålindustrie/Volgo-Balt)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 26/06)

On 15 January 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5310. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5310. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
#### BARBEE v. JEWELERS, INC.

No. 153 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 760.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 28 June 1979.
Case 3:10-mc-00063-MCR -EMT   Document 23    Filed 10/04/10   Page 1 of 1
Reduzca su exposición al polvo

Atado de bolsas a granel

¿Sabía usted?

Si dobla la boquilla de llenado de las

bolsas a granel en dirección opuesta a su

área de respiración, puede reducir las

concentraciones máximas de exposición al

polvo respirable en hasta un 92%

Cuando ate la bolsa, 

doble la boquilla de 

llenado en dirección 

opuesta a usted

Los hallazgos se basan en estudios de campo de NIOSH

Para obtener más información, visite go.usa.gov/xRkXu
# C_2009230EN.01000901.xml

| 24.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 September 2009

2009/C 230/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4783 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4418 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89940 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,0778 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5123 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5640 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,244 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,27 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7063 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1925 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2283 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1918 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6906 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5794 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,4578 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0368 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0879 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 765,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,9509 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0910 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2682 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 341,48 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1230 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,131 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,4070 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,604 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6505 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7856 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,9660 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4783

JPY

Japanese yen

134,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4418

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89940

SEK

Swedish krona

10,0778

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5123

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5640

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,244

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,27

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7063

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1925

RON

Romanian leu

4,2283

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1918

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6906

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5794

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,4578

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0368

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0879

KRW

South Korean won

1 765,03

ZAR

South African rand

10,9509

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0910

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2682

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 341,48

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1230

PHP

Philippine peso

70,131

RUB

Russian rouble

44,4070

THB

Thai baht

49,604

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6505

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7856

INR

Indian rupee

70,9660

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 23.1               Consent of McManus & Company, PC
                           Independent Public Accountants


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-110309) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-109481,
333-106074, and 333-97913) of Eagle Broadband, Inc., of our report dated
December 13, 2002, relating to he financial statements, which appear in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

/s/ McManus & Company, PC
-------------------------
McManus & Company, PC
Rockaway, New Jersey
May 3, 2004
Exhibit 13.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of CityView Corporation Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,P M Smyth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ P M Smyth
--------------
    P M Smyth


January 17, 2007
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPSM, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lawrence Calarco, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Lawrence Calarco

Lawrence Calarco

Chief Executive Officer

December 23, 2016

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CPSM, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Dargan II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/Charles Dargan II

Charles Dargan II

Chief Financial Officer

December 23, 2016
#### RICKERT v. RICKERT

No. 115 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 351.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 31 July 1972.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil No. 3:10cv327/RS-EMT

CONTENTS OF BANK OF AMERICA’S 

BANK ACCOUNT NO. xxxx9489,

 

Defendant.

 /

FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

Before me is the United States’ Motion For Issuance Of Final Order of Forfeiture

(Doc. 11).

1. On August 30, 2010, the United States filed a Civil Complaint against Contents

of Bank of America’s Bank Account No. XXXX9489 containing United States Currency,

and sought forfeiture pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 881(a)(6). 

2. On February 22, 2011, the United States published a Notice of Forfeiture on

www.forfeiture.gov to give notice of the intent of the United States to cause forfeiture of the

property in accordance with Title 21, United States Code, Section 881, and to notify all third

parties of their right to petition the Court within sixty (60) days of the first day of publication

to adjudicate the validity of their alleged legal interest in the real property.
3. The United States also served actual notice of this forfeiture action on Philip

C. Hanley and Keith Munro Hanley.

4. No claims or petitions have been filed for the property described in the

Complaint, and the time for filing petitions has now expired. 

5. The facts set out in the affidavit filed by the United States demonstrate

sufficient grounds for forfeiture. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. No person or entity has established any legal right, title, or interest in said

currency.

2. The property subject to forfeiture by this Order is $9,378.59 in United States

Currency.

3. All rights, title, and interests to all the described currency is hereby

condemned, forfeited, and vested in the United States of America.

ORDERED on March 28, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 10.1


 





	 	


 

201 Isabella
Street

Pittsburgh,
PA 15212

  










 





April 8, 2020


 





Timothy D. Myers





c/o Arconic Corporation





201 Isabella Street





Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212


 





Dear Tim:





 


This letter memorializes our recent discussions
regarding our collective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its dramatic impact on our community, our economy, and Arconic Corporation
(the “Company”).





 


You have voluntarily agreed, during the
Salary Reduction Period (as defined below), to reduce your rate of base salary by 30% from your rate of base salary (your “Regular
Salary”) set forth in the letter agreement between Arconic Inc. and you, dated January 13, 2020 (the “Letter
Agreement”). The “Salary Reduction Period” shall mean the period commencing on April 16, 2020 and
concluding on December 31, 2020 (or such earlier date as the Company determines to conclude the Salary Reduction Period for other
salaried employees). Notwithstanding the foregoing, for all purposes of the Company’s employee benefit plans, including,
without limitation, the Company’s Executive Severance Plan and the Company’s Change in Control Severance Plan, determinations
made by reference to your annual base salary shall be based on your Regular Salary, without regard to the temporary reduction contemplated
hereby. In recognition of the challenges under which the economy is currently operating, the reference to September 30, 2020 in
the “Relocation” paragraph of the Letter Agreement is hereby modified to refer to the later of September 30, 2020 or
the 60th day following the conclusion of the Salary Reduction Period.





 


On a different note, you hereby agree that
the RSUs (as defined in the Letter Agreement) will be granted under the Arconic Corporation 2020 Stock Incentive Plan at the same
time that the Company makes its 2020 annual equity award grants to Company executives generally, which is anticipated to be within
the first month after Legal Day 1 (as defined in the Letter Agreement).


 





Except as modified
hereby, the Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The section of the Letter Agreement entitled “Governing
Law; Jurisdiction” shall apply to this letter as if set forth herein, mutatis mutandis.


 


Please indicate your
agreement to the foregoing by your signature below.


 


Best Regards,


 


 





	By: 	/s/ William F. Austen	
	Name: 	William F. Austen	 
	Title:	Chair, Compensation and Benefits Committee

                                           Arconic Corporation
	 


  


 


	Acknowledged and Agreed:	 	Date:	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Timothy D. Myers	 	04/08/2020	 
	Timothy D. Myers
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40823

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SALVADOR VARGAS NAVARRO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CV-376

USDC No. 4:96-CR-63-2

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Salvador Vargas Navarro, federal prisoner # 05101-010,

appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion as untimely. He maintains that because he filed his

motion within one year of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey,

530 U.S. 466 (2000), and because Apprendi effected a substantive

change in criminal law, it is applicable to his case. Apprendi
No. 02-40823

-2-

is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. 

See United States v. Brown, 305 F.3d 304, 305-09 (5th Cir. 2002),

petition for cert. filed (U.S. Feb. 3, 2003)(No. 02-9606). The

argument is foreclosed by the law of this circuit. Id. The

judgment of the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KELLY WHISBY,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 5:10-cv-170-SPM-EMT

JOHN DOE, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 5). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy and has been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff, who is pro se, filed an objection (doc. 6). Pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have conducted a de novo review

of the sections of the report to which objections have been made. I find that the

Report and Recommendation is correct and should be adopted.

Plaintiff’s complaint (doc. 1) was signed on June 1, 2010, delivered for

mailing on June 14, 2010, and filed on June 23, 2010. As Plaintiff has filed at least

three cases which have been dismissed as frivolous, he is not entitled to proceed

on appeal in forma pauperis and is responsible for payment of the filing fee.

Plaintiff’s allegation of witchcraft does not amount to imminent danger of serious

physical injury. Therefore, as Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee, this action is
subject to dismissal. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 5) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff’s initiating a

new cause of action accompanied by payment of the $350 filing fee,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. All pending motions are denied as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this thirteenth day of October, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 28, 2014

s0224

Order 

Clerk

February 28, 2014

147892

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147892

COA: 309677

Macomb CC: 2011-002252-FH

LASHANDA CHANTILL KELLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 27, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.