alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)
      and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of Redwood Entertainment Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Brian Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: May 17, 2004                 By: /S/ Brian R. Davis
                                   --------------------------------------
                                   Brian R. Davis, Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT   Document 2    Filed 03/23/10   Page 1 of 1
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Banorrblr Norper Qarrimn, Director 

Depertment of Publlo Safety 

~Casip Habry 

A\lk tin, Texas 

Dsar Sir: 

Thir will aokn 

quest for our opinion aa 

of your reebnt rehe psclrege of s4ot~on 9 

oond Lsgialature, 

otlon 0, V*rnon’a 

rtnent rendera an 

ittsn by hrsletaat Attorn4y 

ng that the wordr *approved, 

4 stamped upon the gleer, 

of the refleotor. 

,,,&~yQl44?Nqy$dt of the statute cited reada a8 

You @tata that einee the opinion of Hr. Christopher 

was wrttten, the UPB; of button type reflectora hat beoome 

prevrlemt end that it would be imooaeible to plaoe the ep- 
, 

Honorable Horn=== &rrison, page 2 

proval on the glass of this kind of reflector. Under thee4 

olro~etaEee you ask whethnr it would b4 permiseIbl4 tor 

the approval of reflectors to be stemped on th4 metal flange 

of the refleotor instead of the glass. 

-. 

-. 

Since assignment of your opinion request, we have 

had ooceelon to examine descriptive literature of th4 various 

types of refleotore and to fnepeot several of them. 80144 

manufacturers of button refleotore have enao,eed the glare In 

frar48 so eubetantIally made It appears~Impoeeible that 

the glass part be removed, exoept by breaking the glare or 

destroying th4 frme. If the refleotore otherwise meet 

the tests of the Texas Highway Departm4nt, we eee no good 

reason why the foregolng provlelon of the statute would 

prevent the approval being etaeqed on the metal flan 

rather than on ths glass Itself. The intent of the P eglelatura was doubtleas to prevent the 8819 and us4 of Inferior and inadsquete rsfleotore. The proteotion end safe;; 

of the traveling public wee the paramount oonelderatlon. 

the glaee be firmly etteched to the metal flango or other 

dsvioe, wu r4apeatfully advlae you that the matter of the 

plaoa where the words of aporovel er4 to b4 stamped nets 

within the sound disoratlon of the depertment r4eponslbls 

for thclr approval, but the words ,indlo 

Vinmly l ff Sxed *30 soa% part 0 # 

ting euoh ap?roval .ëî mu~ìí st ,b e th~~‘reflector. 

To the extent stat4d., Xr. Chrletophrr’s opinion 

lo reepaotfully ovsrrulea. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEI? GENERAL OF TEXAS 

TM:50 

APPRCVED NOV 1, 1940 

Q-erald G. Mann /e/ 

ATTCBNEY O!WEiAL OF TEXAS 

BY 

BeiJamin Voodall /e/ 

Ben Jamln Yoodrll 

kssletant 

APPROVED 0PIX;ION 

CW4ITTEE 

Byfb:’ NW-B 

Chairman
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5229 

To amend section 505 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 

Responsibility Act of 1996 to clarify the prohibition on postsecondary 

education benefits for certain aliens, to grant a private right of action 

to persons injured by a violation of such prohibition, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2018 

Mr. PERRY (for himself, Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia, Mr. KING of Iowa, 

Mr. BABIN, Mr. HARRIS, and Mr. BIGGS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition 

to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend section 505 of the Illegal Immigration Reform 

and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 to clarify the 

prohibition on postsecondary education benefits for certain aliens, to grant a private right of action to persons 

injured by a violation of such prohibition, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5229 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tuition Fairness for 

3 Citizens Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY FOR HIGHER EDU5 CATION BENEFITS OF ALIENS NOT LAW6 FULLY PRESENT. 

7 Section 505 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and 

8 Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1623) is 

9 amended to read as follows: 

10 ‘‘SEC. 505. LIMITATION ON ELIGIBILITY FOR HIGHER EDU11 CATION BENEFITS OF ALIENS NOT LAW12 FULLY PRESENT. 

13 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other pro14 vision of law, an alien who is not lawfully present in the 

15 United States shall not be eligible for any postsecondary 

16 education benefit unless all citizens and nationals of the 

17 United States are likewise eligible for such benefit. 

18 ‘‘(b) PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION.—Any person who 

19 is aggrieved by a violation of subsection (a) may bring a 

20 civil action in any court of appropriate jurisdiction for— 

21 ‘‘(1) declaratory, injunctive, or other equitable 

22 relief; 

23 ‘‘(2) damages; and 

24 ‘‘(3) such other relief as the court may deem 

25 appropriate. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5229 IH

1 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section, as amended 

2 by the Tuition Fairness for Citizens Act, shall apply to 

3 benefits provided on or after the date of the enactment 

4 of such Act.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 4



Form 52-109F1

Certification of Annual Filings



I, Gord Steblin, CFO of CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the annual filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim Filings) of CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. for the period ending April 30, 2007;



2.

Based on my knowledge, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the annual filings;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented in the annual filings;



4.

The issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting for the issuer, and we have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared;

(b)

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuers GAAP; and

(c)

evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the annual filings and have caused the issuer to disclose in the annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the annual filings based on such evaluation; and



5.

I have caused the issuer to disclose in the annual MD&A any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuers most recent interim period that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting.



DATED:

August 27, 2007





Per:

Gord Steblin



Gord Steblin

Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:10-CR-27-SPM/GRJ

CARLINE CENEUS, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER 

This cause is before the Court on the Motion for Production of Grand Jury

Transcripts in Their Entirety (doc. 119) and the Court’s Order on November 15,

2011 (doc. 166). In that Order, the Court reserved ruling on the production of the

non-testimonial portions of the grand jury proceedings in this case until the Court

had an opportunity to review them in camera. The Court having made such a

review of the transcripts provided by the Government, has not identified any

inappropriate comments or misstatements of the law regarding recruitment fees,

as were believed to exist by Defense counsel. Accordingly, the request for nontestimonial portions of the grand jury proceedings is hereby denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of December, 2011.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 5722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-513]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology; American Health Information Community Consumer Empowerment 
Workgroup Meeting

ACTION:  Announcement of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 14th meeting of the American Health 
Information Community Consumer Empowerment Workgroup in accordance with 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

DATES: February 16, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a 
Federal building).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/consumer/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Workgroup will discuss outcomes from the 
recent AHIC recommendations process, and continue discussion on a 
personal health record. For additional information, go to http://www.hhs.gov/healthit/ahic/consumer/ce_instruct.html.

    Dated: January 29, 2007.
Judith Sparrow,
Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and 
Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information 
Technology.
[FR Doc. 07-513 Filed 2-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOSEPH P. AKOWSKEY,

Appellant,

v.

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2160

[April 26, 2018]

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth 

Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Robert E. Belanger, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 2014-CA-002440.

Jeffrey M. Clyman of Steele Law, Hobe Sound, for appellant/crossappellee.

Morgan W. Bates and Allison Morat of Pearson Bitman, LLP, Maitland, 

for appellee/cross-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

RICKY W. TISDALE

NO. 2021 KW 1506

MARCH 14, 2022

In Re: Ricky W. Tisdale, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 

380, 891. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

GH

WRC

Guidry, J., dissents. I would grant the writ application

for the sole purpose of remanding to the district court to

reconsider its ruling in light of State v. Harris, 2018- 1012

La. 7/ 9/ 20), 2020 WL 3867207 and to allow the State to file a

response. After the State files a response, the district court

should determine whether it is necessary to conduct an

evidentiary hearing on the claim of ineffective assistance of

counsel at sentencing. State V. Robinson, 2019- 01330 ( La. 

11/ 24/ 20), 304 So. 3d 846 ( per curiam). 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

J , 44ERitJ14Y CLERK OF COUR

FOR THE COURT
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64110-64111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service


Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Southwest Marine 
and General Insurance Company

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the 
Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is Supplement No. 4 to the Treasury Department Circular 
570, 2007 Revision, published July 2, 2007, at 72 FR 36192.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Certificate of Authority as an acceptable 
surety on Federal bonds is hereby issued under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to the 
following company:

Southwest Marine and General Insurance Company (NAIC 
<greek-i>12294). Business Address: 919 Third Avenue, New York, NY 
10022. Phone: (212) 551-0600. Underwriting Limitation b/: 
$2,503,000. Surety Licenses c/: AZ. Incorporated in Arizona.

Federal bond-approving officers should annotate their reference copies 
of the Treasury Circular 570 (``Circular''), 2007 Revision, to reflect 
this addition.
    Certificates of Authority expire on June 30th each year, unless 
revoked prior to that date. The Certificates are subject to subsequent 
annual renewal as long as the companies remain qualified (see 31 CFR 
part 223). A list of qualified companies is published annually as of 
July 1 in the Circular, which outlines details as to underwriting 
limitations, areas in which companies are licensed to transact surety 
business, and other information.
    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at 
http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570.
    Questions concerning this Notice may be directed to the U.S. 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial 
Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch, 3700 East-West 
Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.


[[Page 64111]]


    Dated: November 5, 2007.
Vivian L. Cooper,
Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division.
[FR Doc. 07-5639 Filed 11-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Globotek Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vladislav Feliksovich Tenenbaum, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.








Date: August 16, 2010
By:
//s/Vladislav Feliksovich TenenbaumVladislav Feliksovich TenenbaumPresident (Principal Executive Officer)
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SHAWN M KESLING,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00151-MP-GRJ

D L DOBY, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Presently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification, in which

Plaintiff seeks clarification regarding the Court’s December 3, 2010 Order. (Doc. 17.)

Plaintiff requests that he be allowed to file a copy of the amended complaint with the

Court because the original was lost in the mail. (See Docs. 16, 17 and 18). The Court

requires original papers to be filed. Plaintiff, therefore, should re-write his copy on a

blank complaint form so that he can file an original. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Clarification, insofar as Plaintiff requests leave to file a

copy of his amended complaint (doc. 18), is DENIED. 

2. The Clerk shall mail a blank complaint form to Plaintiff which he shall

complete and return on or before January 10, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20 day of December 2010. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
# CA2009239EN.01000201.xml

| 6.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 239/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 239/2

---

RESERVE LIST
   (1)

RESERVE LIST

1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/62/08

OPEN COMPETITION

ASSISTANTS (AST 3)

ASSISTANTS

Technicians in the nuclear field

(2009/C 239 A/02)

| ALFARANO | Anna |
| --- | --- |
| BADALAMENTI | Pietro |
| BORELLA | Alessandro |
| CAMBRIANI | Andrea |
| CHIAMENTI | Luca |
| DAHMS | Eckhard |
| D'AMATI | Francesco |
| DAQUINO | Giuseppe Giovanni |
| DE POOTER | Vincent |
| EKLUND | Gustav |
| GALLETTA | Michele |
| GEERTS | Wouter |
| GERLI | Stefania |
| GIGASE | Yves |
| HORNUNG | Daniel Klaus |
| JAKOBSSON | Ulf |
| KINTZ | Yvan |
| KIPS | Ruth S. E. |
| MARMIER | Alain |
| MARTINEZ-FERRI | Ana -Isabel |
| MERESOVA | Jana |
| MOREL | Sylvain |
| NEGREANU | Bradu Cristian |
| PAEPEN | Jan |
| RAUSCH | Nicole Jeanette |
| SANDOW | Miguel |
| SCHORLE | Helene |
| SPASOVA | Yana |
| STOHR | Sarah |
| SVEDKAUSKAITE-LEGORE | Jolanta |
| TRUYENS | Jan |
| VANLEEUW | David |
| VARGAS ZUNIGA | Martin |
| VERMEIREN | Steven |
| VIDALI | Marzio |
| WYNANTS | Ruud |

ALFARANO

Anna

BADALAMENTI

Pietro

BORELLA

Alessandro

CAMBRIANI

Andrea

CHIAMENTI

Luca

DAHMS

Eckhard

D'AMATI

Francesco

DAQUINO

Giuseppe Giovanni

DE POOTER

Vincent

EKLUND

Gustav

GALLETTA

Michele

GEERTS

Wouter

GERLI

Stefania

GIGASE

Yves

HORNUNG

Daniel Klaus

JAKOBSSON

Ulf

KINTZ

Yvan

KIPS

Ruth S. E.

MARMIER

Alain

MARTINEZ-FERRI

Ana -Isabel

MERESOVA

Jana

MOREL

Sylvain

NEGREANU

Bradu Cristian

PAEPEN

Jan

RAUSCH

Nicole Jeanette

SANDOW

Miguel

SCHORLE

Helene

SPASOVA

Yana

STOHR

Sarah

SVEDKAUSKAITE-LEGORE

Jolanta

TRUYENS

Jan

VANLEEUW

David

VARGAS ZUNIGA

Martin

VERMEIREN

Steven

VIDALI

Marzio

WYNANTS

Ruud

The reserve list will be valid until 31 December 2010 and may be extended.

31 December 2010

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 4:10cr50-RH/WCS

EUGENE TELFAIR and

ROBERT NIXON,

Defendants.

________________________________________/

ORDER RESCHEDULING THE TRIAL FOR NOVEMBER 1, 2010

This case was originally set for trial during the two-week trial period that

begins on September 7, 2010. When the courtroom deputy clerk advised the

attorneys of the stacking of the case within the trial period—in the expectation that

the trial would actually extend through the next week—one of the attorneys

indicated a conflict. This was understandable; the original expectation was that

the trial would be finished during the two-week trial period.

The conflict was addressed on the record in hearings on August 31 and

September 3, 2010. The earliest trial period when all parties are available is the

one that begins on November 1, and there is a conflict on November 3 and 4

within that trial period. This order confirms the schedule as set during the
Page 2 of 2

September 3 hearing.

Each defendant, through his attorney, specifically waived any speedy trial

right inconsistent with this order. In addition, as announced on the record, I find

that a reasonable delay of the trial from September 7, 2010, until November 8,

2010, is appropriate, and that the ends of justice that will be served by

rescheduling the trial outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a

speedier trial. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

An attorney conference and jury selection will occur on November 1, 2010,

or November 8, 2010. Either way, the remainder of the trial will begin on

November 8, 2010. The attorney conference will occur in the courtroom at 8:15

on the morning of jury selection. The clerk must notice the trial for November 1 at

8:15 a.m. If jury selection is moved to November 8, the clerk will issue a new

notice. The attorneys may contact the courtroom deputy clerk at any time for the

most recent available information on whether jury selection will occur on

November 1 or 8. 

SO ORDERED on September 3, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case No: 4:10cr50-RH/WCS
# C_2010023EN.01000102.xml

| 30.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5709 — Volkswagen/Mahag)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 23/02

On 18 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5709. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5709. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---