alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-05-0289-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL D AUGUST 25, 2005

______________________________ JERRY LEE SMITH, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 364 TH DISTRIC T COURT O F LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2004-406,817; HONORABLE BR ADLEY S. U NDERWOOD, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS an d CAMPBELL, JJ. ON ABA TEMENT AND REMAND Appellant

Jerry Lee Smith, a cting p ro se, perfected a ppeal from his conv iction of possession of a controlled substance. In r espon se to notice from thi s court that no do cke ting statement had been fil ed, appellant has advised the court he desir es to prosecute the appeal but r emains unrepres ented by couns el on appeal. He asserts he is unable to retain coun sel, requests appointment of couns el and an exte nsion of time tofile the docketi ng st atement. The record has not been filed, and is not due unti l September2

19, 2005. In the interest of judicial efficiency we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court to conduct a hearing and determ ine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appoi ntment of counsel. Should the tri al court determine that appellant

is indigent, then the trial court shall take such measures a s may be necessary toa ssure appella nt effective assi stance of counsel, including the appointment of counsel. If couns el is appointe d, the name, address, telephone number, and state ba r number of said counse l shall be incl uded in th e order appointing counsel. Finally , the trial court shall execute find ings o f fa ct, co nclu sion s of law, and such orders as t he court may enter regar ding the aforementi oned issuesand cause its findings and con cl usions to be included in a supple mental clerk's record to be filed in this court no

later than M onday, October 3, 2005.

Per Curiam Do not publish
.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SIDNEY MARTS,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv240/LAC/EMT

EDWIN G. BUSS,

Respondent.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May 20, 2011 (Doc. 42). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the

objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 37) is GRANTED on the ground that the

amended petition fails to properly present grounds demonstrating a basis for habeas relief.

3. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 10) is DISMISSED without

prejudice to Petitioner’s filing a second amended petition.

4. This matter is referred to the assigned magistrate judge for issuance of an order

directing Petitioner to file a second amended petition.

5. Petitioner is instructed not to file a second amended petition until directed to do so

Case 3:10-cv-00240-LC-EMT Document 45 Filed 06/01/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

by the assigned magistrate judge.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1 day of June, 2011. st

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv240/LAC/EMT

Case 3:10-cv-00240-LC-EMT Document 45 Filed 06/01/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009242EN.01001901.xml

| 9.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/19

---

Call for proposals under the 2010 work programme ‘People’ of the 7th EC Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities

2009/C 242/03

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the 2010 work programme ‘People’ of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Community for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration Activities (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call. Call deadline and budget are given in the call text, which is published on the CORDIS website.

‘People’ Specific Programme:

‘People’ Specific Programme:

| Call Title | Call Identifier |
| --- | --- |
| Reintegration grants | FP7-PEOPLE-2010-RG |

Call Title

Call Identifier

Reintegration grants

FP7-PEOPLE-2010-RG

This call for proposals relates to the 2010 work programme adopted by Commission Decision C(2009) 5892 of 29.7.2009.

Information on the modalities of the call, the work programme, and the guide for applicants on how to submit proposals is available through the CORDIS website: http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/calls/

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trevenex Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Aik Fun Chong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |                                      
|------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                    |                                      
|Dated:  May 6, 2010 | By: /s/ Aik Fun Chong                
|                    | Aik Fun Chong                        
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

PLANET BINGO, LLC, 

a California limited liability company,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-64/RS-MD

WILD BILL’S BINGO, INC., 

A Florida corporation,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Before me are Counter Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended 

Counterclaim (Doc. 25) and Counter Claimant’s Response in Opposition (Doc. 26). 

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(d), the motion to dismiss shall be converted into a 

motion for summary judgment under Rule 56. Plaintiff shall file all material that is

pertinent to whether summary judgment is appropriate not later than August 27, 2010. 

Defendant shall file its response not later than September 10, 2010.

ORDERED on August 12, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Rogue Wave Software, Inc:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-16749, 333-48485 and 333-48525) on Form S-8 of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. of
our report dated October 28, 2003, except as to note 16
which is as of November 12, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheets
of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2003 and 2002
and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended September 30, 2003, which report appears in the
September 30, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K, of Rogue Wave Software, Inc.

KPMG LLP

Boulder, Colorado
November 21, 2003
Case 4:10-cv-00337-SPM-WCS Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 1 of 9Case 4:10-cv-00337-SPM-WCS Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 2 of 9Case 4:10-cv-00337-SPM-WCS Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 3 of 9Case 4:10-cv-00337-SPM-WCS Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 4 of 9Case 4:10-cv-00337-SPM-WCS Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 5 of 9Case 4:10-cv-00337-SPM-WCS Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 6 of 9Case 4:10-cv-00337-SPM-WCS Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 7 of 9Case 4:10-cv-00337-SPM-WCS Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 8 of 9Case 4:10-cv-00337-SPM-WCS Document 1 Filed 08/11/10 Page 9 of 9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION AND ) 

GULF RESTORATION NETWORK, INC. ) 

Plaintiffs 

v. 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTION AGENCY 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.4: 1 O-cv-293-WS/WCS 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS 

Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the terms of the 

. settlement agreement filed with this Court on February 29, 2012, Plaintiffs in the abovecaptioned proceeding file this Unopposed Motion to Dismiss their Complaint. 

On July 14,2010, Plaintiffs filed a Complaint for Injunctive Relief to enforce their rights 

pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. Specifically, Plaintiffs sought to obtain disclosure 

of the ingredients in the dispersants eligible for use during and after the Deepwater Horizon spill 

in the Gulf of Mexico, among other records. In a settlement agreement filed with this Court on 

February 29, 2012, which resolved all issues between the Plaintiffs and Defendant, Plaintiffs, in 

consideration for the payment of $35,805.00 as full settlement of attorneys' fees and costs, 

agreed "unconditionally to release, hold harmless, and discharge the [Defendant,] their 

successors, assignees, agents, and employees from any and all claims, demands, causes of 

actions or suits, damages and expenses of whatever kind, ... and wheresoever situated, that 

might now exist or hereafter exist by reason of or arising from the incidents or circumstances 

giving rise to the proceedings in this case." In the settlement agreement, Plaintiffs also agreed to 

Case 4:10-cv-00293-WS-CAS Document 56 Filed 06/25/12 Page 1 of 2
file an unopposed motion to dismiss the case within ten days after receiving the sum of 

$35,805.00 from Defendant for attorneys' fees and costs. 

Plaintiffs received payment of attorneys' fees and costs from the Defendant on June 11, 

2012. Accordingly, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court enter an order dismissing this 

case. 

Respectfully submitted this 26~ay of June, 2012. 

Marianne L. Engelman Lado 

NY BarNo. 2212579 

Earthj ustice 

156 William Street, Suite 800 

New York, NY 10038-5326 

Phone: (212) 791-1881. 

Fax: (212) 918-1556 

menge1manlado@earthjustice,org 

Counsel for Plaintifft 

2 

Monica K. Reimer (FL #0090069) 

Florida Bar No. 0090069 

Earthjustice 

III S. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. 

Tallahassee, FL 32301 

Phone: (850) 681-0031 

Fax: (850) 681-0020 

mreimer@earthjustice.org 

Case 4:10-cv-00293-WS-CAS Document 56 Filed 06/25/12 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. SCHOOL

No. 44 PC.

No. 125 (Fall Term).

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 665.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 25 September 1979.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CLINTON LEON MOORMAN, JR.,

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No. 4:10cv353-RH/WCS

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

In an order filed August 31, 2010, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended

complaint by September 30, 2010. Doc. 4. On September 13, 2010, Plaintiff's copy of

that order was returned to the Clerk's office marked "moved left no address, unable to

forward." Doc. 6. To date, Plaintiff has not notified the court of a new address. 

Plaintiff's only submission to the court was his original complaint and Motion for

leave to proceed IFP, docs. 1 and 2. It is Plaintiff's responsibility to prosecute his own

lawsuit and to keep this court apprised of his current address. Since Plaintiff has not

furnished the court with a new address, it is doubtful that he will even receive a copy of

this report and recommendation. In the event the Plaintiff does receive a copy of this

report and recommendation, the court will allow him an opportunity to show cause why

this report and recommendation should be vacated, failing which, the Clerk shall be

directed to forward the report and recommendation to the assigned district judge. 
Page 2 of 2

It is therefore RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE. 

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on September 16, 2010. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after

being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of

review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv353-RH/WCS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1749 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1749

   To clarify seasoning requirements for certain refinanced mortgage 
                     loans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2019

Ms. Sinema (for herself and Mr. Tillis) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To clarify seasoning requirements for certain refinanced mortgage 
                     loans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Affordable Mortgages for 
Veterans Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. SEASONING REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN REFINANCED MORTGAGE LOANS.

    (a) Ginnie Mae.--Section 306(g)(1) of the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1721(g)(1)) is amended by striking the second sentence.
    (b) Veterans Loans.--Section 3709(c) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter before paragraph (1), by striking ``is 
        refinanced'' and inserting ``is a refinance''; and
            (2) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting the 
        following new paragraphs:
            ``(1) the date on which the borrower has made at least six 
        consecutive monthly payments on the loan being refinanced; and
            ``(2) the date that is 210 days after the first payment due 
        date of the loan being refinanced.''.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act may be construed to 
restrict or otherwise modify the authorities of the Government National 
Mortgage Association.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BRYCE WESSELLS,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv320/MCR/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated November 30, 2011 (doc. 40). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have

been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, I have

determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss (doc. 31) is GRANTED.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice

as untimely. 

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of December, 2011.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00320-MCR-EMT Document 41 Filed 12/30/11 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; RFP NIH-NIDDK-06-07, Urologic Diseases in America.                    

*Date:*                         February 26, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         2:30 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                     

*Contact Person:*                         Paul A. Rushing, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 747, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-8895,                         *rushingp@extra.niddk.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metrobolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 1, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-558 Filed 2-7-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 10(d)

ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP.

December 5, 2007



|To: | James R. Huffines
|--- | -----------------



| | Re: | Consulting Arrangement
| | --- | ----------------------

This letter confirms our
mutual understanding regarding your agreement to serve as a consultant to Energy Future Holdings Corp, a Texas corporation (the Company), as of October 10, 2007.

As compensation for your agreement to provide consulting and advisory services to the Company from time to time as requested by the Company, you will
receive an annual consulting fee of $225,000 per annum, payable quarterly in arrears for up to five years. The first quarterly payment in respect of such services to occur on January 31, 2008.

For the avoidance of doubt, you shall have full responsibility, and the Company shall have no responsibility, for satisfying any liability for any
federal, state or local income or other taxes required by law to be paid with respect to any compensation paid hereunder. Further, your consulting duties will not compel you to undertake any work that would require you to register as a lobbyist with
any state, local or federal authority.

You acknowledge that this letter embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the
Company and you with respect to any compensation that you are entitled to receive from the Company or its predecessors or affiliates with respect to consulting arrangements provided by you and this letter supersedes any prior agreements between you
and the Company or its predecessors or affiliates. This letter does not address any cash or equity compensation that you will receive in your capacity as a director of the Company. You acknowledge that upon the closing of the merger of the Company
with Texas Energy Future Merger Sub Corp on October 10, 2007, a cash payment was made to your account in error and that those amounts shall promptly be returned by you to the Company.



---

If this letter is consistent with your understanding, please sign your name in the space provided below
and return this fully executed letter to my attention.



Yours truly,/s/ Riz ChandEnergy Future Holdings Corp.




|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|Acknowledged and agreed as of December , 2007:
|                                              
|/s/ James R. Huffines                         
|James R. Huffines
# C_2009081EN.01000202.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5426 — Dassault Aviation/TSA/Thales)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 81/04

On 10 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5426. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5426. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---