alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0345

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JUDSON LEE BROWN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 20, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 14 2022

04/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0345
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-82,941-01
EX P ARTE DONALD CHASSTI ON, Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1220013-A IN THE 228 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Ap p l i cant was convicted of possession of
coca ine and se ntence d to 30 day s’ incar cer ation in the County J ail. T E X . P E N A L C O D E § 12.44(a)
. Applicant contends that newly discovere d laboratory analy sis in this case ref lects that he did not possess any

coca ine. T he State and trial court ag ree that Applicant is entitled to relief
. Applicant’s cl ai m i s supported by the habea s rec ord. Applicant i s en titled to relief
. Ex parte Mable , 443 S.W .3d 1292

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Relief is g rante d. The judgme nt in Cause No. 1220013 in the 228 District Court of Har ris t h County is set aside, and Applicant is rema nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Har ris County to
answe r the char g es as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any nece s sary bench
war rant within 10 day s after

the mandate of this Court issues. Co p ie s o f th is o p in io n shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice–Corre cti o n a l Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: J uly

1, 2015 Do not publish
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-005-113    405-3-054-CV

THE CADLE COMPANY ANDVeErRnNoOnN WhHiIpPpPlLeE ArRtTuUrRoO GuUeErRrRaA, SrR., InNdDiIvViIdDuUaAlLlLyY, Margarita Muniz, Individually, Misty R. Guerra, Individually, and each as authorized representatives of the Estate of Arturo Guerra, Jr., Deceased	APPELLANTSS

MaArRgGaArRiItTaA MuUnNiIzZ, InNdDiIvViIdDuUaAlLlLyY, Misty R. Guerra, Individually, and each as authorized representatives of the Estate of Arturo Guerra, Jr., Deceased

MiIsStTyY R. GuUeErRrRaA, InNdDiIvViIdDuUaAlLlLyY, aAnNdD each as authorized representatives of the Estate of Arturo Guerra, Jr., Deceased

eEaAcChH aAsS aAuUtThHoOrRiIzZeEdD rReEpPrReEsSeEnNtTaAtTiIvVeEsS of the Estate of Arturo Guerra, Jr., Deceased

oOfF tThHeE EsStTaAtTeE oOfF ArRtTuUrRoO GuUeErRrRaA, JrR., 

DeEcCeEaAsSeEdD

DANIEL C. CADLEVernon Whipple

	V.

DAVID B. LOBINGIER AND THER2 EeEnNtTeErRpPrRiIsSeEsS, IiInNcC. aAnNdD TtTeEdD RrReEeEvVeEsS TrRuUmMaAnN DeEwWeEsSsS, AH, L.L.C., gGeEnNeErRaAlL partner of Aggregate Haulers I, L.P. d/b/a Aggregate Haulers, Rumco, Inc. and 4-B Trucking, Inc.	APPELLEESS

pPaArRtTnNeErR oOfF AgGgGrReEgGaAtTeE HaAuUlLeErRsS I, L.P. d/b/a Aggregate Haulers, Rumco, Inc. and 4-B Trucking, Inc.

dD/bB/aA AgGgGrReEgGaAtTeE HaAuUlLeErRsS, RuUmMcCoO, InNcC. and 4-B Trucking, Inc.

aAnNdD 4-B TrRuUcCkKiInNgG, InNcC.

STATE OF TEXAS

	----------

	FROM THE  271ST271ST DISTRICT 48TH 158TH       158TH DISTRICT COURT OF WISE            DENTON TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered the “aapAAappellant’s’ Joint “NWithdrawal of Of Notice Of Appeal.,” which swe treat as a motion to dismiss this appeal.  Motion to Dismiss for Mootness.”  Appeal Due To Settlement.”  It is the court'’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(21), 43.2(f).

	Appellants shall pay all costs of this appealCosts of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL DMDD:	mDAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 2430, 2005December 31, 2003  ddECEMBERDecember 229, 20052
# National Diabetes Month, 2007

Diabetes is a debilitating disease that affects millions of Americans of all ages and all walks of life. National Diabetes Month is an opportunity to raise awareness about risk factors, prevention, and treatment of this serious disease. 

Diabetes is a chronic illness that leaves the body unable to produce or properly use insulin to maintain healthy blood glucose levels. The two most common forms of the disease that affect our citizens are Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Type 1 diabetes, once known as juvenile diabetes, is usually diagnosed in children and young adults who are unable to produce insulin and require daily medication. Type 2 diabetes, the most common form of the disease, is often attributed to lifestyle risk factors and can be controlled by a modified diet, regular physical activity, and medication. Americans can take steps to control the disease and lower the risk of complications such as heart disease, stroke, and kidney disease by maintaining healthy eating and exercise habits, and consulting with a doctor about diabetes testing. 

My Administration is committed to providing better care for people living with diabetes and furthering efforts to find a cure. We have supported research initiatives and education programs that encourage healthy living, and we have also modified Medicare coverage to include diabetes screenings. This year, the National Institutes of Health estimates that more than $1 billion will be spent on diabetes research. By working together, we can help identify problems early, manage them before they grow worse, and help ensure more Americans live longer, healthier lives. 

Throughout National Diabetes Month, we recognize the medical professionals, scientists, researchers, and all those whose efforts have made a positive difference in the fight against diabetes. By raising public awareness, we can help combat the effects of diabetes in our society and bring hope to children and families living with this disease. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 2007 as National Diabetes Month. I call upon all Americans to learn more about the risk factors and symptoms associated with diabetes and to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07-5548

Billing code 3195-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          21,823
<SECURITIES>                                    11,703
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,150
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,729
<PP&E>                                          14,249
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,041
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,326
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,619
<SALES>                                         54,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,442
<CGS>                                            9,691
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                56,385
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,757)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       746
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,503)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,503)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.00)


</TABLE>
# C_2009116EN.01001801.xml

| 21.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/18

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 May 2009

2009/C 116/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3690 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,06 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4452 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88260 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4915 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5124 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8100 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,615 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,85 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3687 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1617 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0996 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7655 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5724 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6134 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2609 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9994 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 706,82 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5106 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3434 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3634 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 093,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8428 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,590 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,3320 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,169 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7819 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6943 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,9180 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3690

JPY

Japanese yen

131,06

DKK

Danish krone

7,4452

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88260

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4915

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5124

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8100

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,615

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,85

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3687

RON

Romanian leu

4,1617

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0996

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7655

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5724

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6134

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2609

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9994

KRW

South Korean won

1 706,82

ZAR

South African rand

11,5106

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3434

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3634

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 093,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8428

PHP

Philippine peso

64,590

RUB

Russian rouble

43,3320

THB

Thai baht

47,169

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7819

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6943

INR

Indian rupee

64,9180

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
| (1)   | the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ESL Teachers, Inc. for the quarter ended      December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended December 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of ESL Teachers,      Inc. |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Mauricio      Beltran                                                       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Mauricio      Beltran                                                           |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
| Date:  | February 11,      2009                                                     |
Exhibit 10.72

July 19, 2007

Jon Rosen

124 Lessay

Newport Coast, CA 92657

Dear Jon:

Reference is made to that certain letter agreement, dated June 19, 2006, between Jon Rosen (Employee) and Autobytel Inc. (Company), pursuant
to which Employee was offered and accepted the position of Senior Vice President, Web Business Operations of the Company (the Letter).

Under
such Letter, the Company agreed to cover the closing costs on the sale of Employees then current primary residence as described in the Letter. In lieu of covering such costs, including, without limitation, customary real estate broker fees not
to exceed 6%, reasonable legal fees, title costs and similar reasonable out of pocket expenses, the Company and Employee agree that the Company will pay Employee seventy five thousand dollars ($75,000).

This letter sets forth our complete understanding regarding the matters addressed herein and supersedes all previous agreements or understandings between Employee and
the Company, whether written or oral, regarding the subject matter hereof. Except as modified by this letter, the other provisions of the Letter shall remain in full force and effect.

Please evidence your agreement with the foregoing by signing below and returning a signed copy of this letter to the undersigned.



Best regards,Autobytel Inc./s/ James E. RiesenbachJames E. Riesenbach CEO and
President




|                          
|--------------------------
|ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO    
|this 19 day of July, 2007:
|                          
|/s/ Jon Rosen             
|Jon Rosen
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00589-CR

Gavino RIOS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 423613

Honorable Jason Wolff, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED February 11, 2015.

_____________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GMAC INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:09-CV-332-SPM/WCS

BRUCE H. THOMAS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon “Plaintiff’s Motion to Voluntarily

Dismiss the Proceeding” (doc. 10). Pursuant to Northern District of Florida Local Rule

16.2(D), it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. This case is hereby dismissed.

2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of 60 days, during which

time any party may move to reopen for good cause shown, including so

as to enforce the terms of a settlement agreement.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-fifth day of January, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

EUGENE LONG,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv356/LAC/CJK

K.W. DIERMYER, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 9, 2011. (Doc. 12). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:10-cv-00356-LC-CJK Document 13 Filed 07/11/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of July, 2011.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv356/LAC/CJK

Case 3:10-cv-00356-LC-CJK Document 13 Filed 07/11/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KELVIN FRAZIER,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv48/WS/MD

WALTER A. MCNEIL,

Respondent.

_______________________________________________________________________

ORDER, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 17, 2010, this court entered a Report and Recommendation

recommending that this habeas case be dismissed, because the pleadings and

attachments established that the petition was intended for filing in state court, not

this court. (Doc. 15). In response, petitioner has filed a Notice of Voluntary

Dismissal. (Doc. 16). 

Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that an action may

be dismissed without an order of the court by filing a notice of dismissal before the

opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. FED. R. CIV.P.

41(a)(1)(A)(i). Since respondent has not yet been served in the instant case, it is clear

that petitioner is automatically entitled to a voluntary dismissal at this time.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

That the Report and Recommendation dated February 17, 2010 (doc. 15), is

hereby VACATED.

And it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That petitioner’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, which has been docketed

as a motion, (doc. 16) be GRANTED.
Page 2 of 2

2. That the petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) be DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE.

3. That the Clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida this 24 day of February, 2010. th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be

filed within fourteen days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline

that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and

does not control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. 

Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28

U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Case No: 3:10cv48/WS/MD
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DARNELL ANTHONY JACKSON,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv191/RH/EMT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Petitioner commenced this action

by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus (see Doc. 33, Attach. 6). On July 23, 2010, this court

entered an order giving Petitioner thirty days to file an amended petition on the court-approved form

(Doc. 35). Petitioner failed to comply with the order; therefore, on August 26, 2010, the court issued

an order requiring Petitioner to show cause, within twenty (20) days, why this action should not be

dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc. 38). The time for compliance with

the show cause order has now elapsed with no response from Petitioner.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Petitioner’s failure to comply

with an order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 21st day of September 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 5:10cv191/RH/EMT
Case 1:06-cv-14855-AKH Document 5 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. MARTIN

No. 49.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 613.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 13 April 1972.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KATHY COBB,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 3:09cv354/MCR/EMT

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement of this

matter. Therefore, the above-entitled action is DISMISSED from the active docket of the

court. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves the power,

upon motion filed by any party within sixty (60) days of the date of this order, to amend or

vacate and set aside this Order of Dismissal and reinstate this case. At this time, the Clerk

is directed to close the file in this case for administrative purposes, and upon the expiration

of sixty (60) days without activity, the Clerk is directed to close the case in its entirety for

all purposes.

ORDERED on this 9th day of September, 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 9
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/05/10 Page 2 of 9
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/05/10 Page 3 of 9
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/05/10 Page 4 of 9
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/05/10 Page 5 of 9
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/05/10 Page 6 of 9
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/05/10 Page 7 of 9
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/05/10 Page 8 of 9
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 2 Filed 05/05/10 Page 9 of 9