alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010015EN.01000101.xml

| 21.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5699 — Adecco/MPS Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 15/01

On 17 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5699. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5699. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                          21,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,100
<PP&E>                                         232,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 494,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,500
<BONDS>                                        106,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                     215,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   494,200
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,600
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (1,600)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    800
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.40
        

</TABLE>
302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Bruce Bent, certify that:

 

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Astro Aerospace Ltd.;

 

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

      a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

      b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

      c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report, our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

      d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

----
# C_2009255EN.01000701.xml

| 24.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 October 2009

2009/C 255/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5020 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4438 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,91720 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2338 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5132 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,909 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,96 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1752 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2903 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2051 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6235 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5807 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,6405 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9872 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0928 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 774,80 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2133 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2564 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2200 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 171,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0805 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,564 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,5325 |
| THB | Thai baht | 50,204 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5775 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,3758 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,8580 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5020

JPY

Japanese yen

137,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4438

GBP

Pound sterling

0,91720

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2338

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5132

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,909

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,96

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1752

RON

Romanian leu

4,2903

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2051

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6235

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5807

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,6405

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9872

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0928

KRW

South Korean won

1 774,80

ZAR

South African rand

11,2133

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2564

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2200

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 171,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0805

PHP

Philippine peso

70,564

RUB

Russian rouble

43,5325

THB

Thai baht

50,204

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5775

MXN

Mexican peso

19,3758

INR

Indian rupee

69,8580

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

OMAR F. BARNES,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 3:09cv360/MCR/EMT

SECRETARY, FLA. DEP’T OF CORR.,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated October 27, 2011 (doc. 38). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The court has

made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections (doc. 40).

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, the objections, and the record,

the court determines that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of November, 2011.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00360-MCR-EMT Document 41 Filed 11/22/11 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 21.1 Subsidiaries of Knology, Inc.: Interstate Telephone Company (Georgia)
Valley Telephone Co., LLC (Alabama)
Globe Telecommunications, Inc. (Georgia)
ITC Globe, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Knoxville, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Lexington, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Louisville, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Nashville, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Kentucky, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology New Media, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology Broadband of Florida, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology Broadband of California, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology Broadband, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Augusta, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Charleston, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Columbus, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Huntsville, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Montgomery, Inc. (Alabama)
Knology of Alabama, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Florida, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Georgia, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of South Carolina, Inc. (Delaware)
Knology of Tennessee, Inc. (Delaware)
# C_2009177EN.01000401.xml

| 30.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 July 2009

2009/C 177/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4104 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4451 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86110 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,5849 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5268 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7890 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,540 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,75 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7020 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1928 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2183 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0975 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7220 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5335 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9307 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1457 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0353 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 752,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1778 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6350 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3420 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 043,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9836 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,859 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,2170 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,989 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6679 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7160 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,3000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4104

JPY

Japanese yen

133,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4451

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86110

SEK

Swedish krona

10,5849

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5268

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7890

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,540

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,75

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7020

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1928

RON

Romanian leu

4,2183

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0975

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7220

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5335

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9307

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1457

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0353

KRW

South Korean won

1 752,15

ZAR

South African rand

11,1778

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6350

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3420

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 043,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9836

PHP

Philippine peso

67,859

RUB

Russian rouble

44,2170

THB

Thai baht

47,989

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6679

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7160

INR

Indian rupee

68,3000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 213 (Monday, November 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5545]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Correction to notice of briefing.

Date and Time:  Friday, November 9, 2007; 9:30 a.m.

Place:  U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 624 Ninth Street, NW., Rm. 
540, Washington, DC 20425.

Corrected Briefing Agenda

    Discrimination Against Native Americans in Border Towns (On 
November 1, 2007, a notice was placed in the Federal Register at 72 FR 
61858 indicating that the briefing would concern Minorities in Foster 
Care Adoption. The November 9, 2007 briefing is on Discrimination 
Against Native Americans in Border Towns.)

I. Introductory Remarks by Chairman.
II. Speakers' Presentations.
III. Questions by Commissioners and Staff Director.
IV. Adjourn.

Contact Person for Further Information: Sock Foon MacDougall, Press and 
Communications, (202) 376-8582.

    Dated: November 1, 2007.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-5545 Filed 11-1-07; 3:30 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
#### STATE v. CLARENCE N. PERRY.

(Filed 19 December 1963.)

Criminal Law §§ 85, 101—

The fact that defendant’s confession introduced in evidence -by th-e State contains exculpatory statements does noit justify nonsuit when -the State introduces substantive -evidence in contradiction of the exculpatory matter.

Appeal by -defendant from *Fountain, J..,*May Criminal Session 1963 0'f ALAMANCE.

*770At Ühe May Term 1962 of the Superior Court of Alamance County, the Grand Jury returned two- bills of indictment against the defendant, one charging that the defendant wilfully and maliciously damaged the residence of one Thomas Oakley by the use of an explosive, and the other 'charging he wilfully and maliciously injured Rosemond Perry, his wife, and damaged her residence by the use of an explosive.

The defendant was .tried and convicted on these bills of indictment, without the benefit .of counsel, at the May Term 1962 of the Superior Court of 'the aforesaid county.

As the result of a post conviction hearing, the defendant was granted a new trial with court appointed counsel. He was again tried and convicted on the original bills .of indictment at the May Criminal Session 1963 of the Superior Count of said county.

The cases were consolidated for trial and judgment. From the judgment imposed, the defendant appeal®, assigning error.

*Attorney General Bruton, Deputy Attorney General Ralph Moody for the State.*

*W. C. Bumgarner for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The defendant contends that the State’s evidence was insufficient -to sustain the verdicts rendered below, and that his motion for judgment las of nonsuit made at the close of all the evidence should have been sustained.

The defendant relies upon the fact that the State used his conf ession as made to a police officer in Burlington, North Carolina. This confession was to the effect that he took two sticks of dynamite and capped ■and fused .them; that he took this dynamite from his brother’» home near Spring Hope, North Carolina, where he was living; that he got his nephew to take him to 1027 Rainey Street in Burlington, where his wife and children lived, on 13 April 1962; that “he lit the fuse, took the dynamite .and .threw it underhanded up beside the house.” The defendant further’ stated, according to. the testimony of the -police officer, that “he had no intention -of hurting his children.”

The evidence tends to show that the home in which defendant’s wife and children lived and the room in which they were asleep at the time, were substantially damaged and the wife was .seriously -injured. Likewise, the Oakley home located nearby was damaged.

The fact that -a confession contains exculpatory statements does not justify a nonsuit when the State introduce® substantive evidence in contradiction of such exculpatory declarations. *S. v. Tolbert,*240 N.C. 445, 82 S.E. 2d 201.

*771In our opinion, the State’s evidence was sufficient to withstand the motion for judgment as of nonsuit and to support the verdicts rendered.

The ruling below is

Affirmed.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOHN D. SOUTER, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv65/MCR/EMT

WARDEN ELLIS, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER

This cause is before the court on Plaintiff’s amended civil rights complaint filed pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 17). Leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been granted. 

Plaintiff names twenty (20) Defendants in this action, including nine (9) unidentified

Defendants, three of whom are described as Lieutenant “John Does,” four as Correctional Officer

“John Does,” one as Nurse “Jane Doe,” and one as “Colonal” (Doc. 17 at 1–6). Plaintiff is advised

that it is incumbent upon him to ascertain the identities of the unidentified Defendants, either by

name, whereabouts, or description, so that they may be served. While the use of “John Doe”

Defendants is initially permissible, Plaintiff must first seek to determine the identities of these

persons before the court will direct service of this action.1 Once Plaintiff has made such an attempt,

he must inform the court of the steps taken to discover the identities of the nine individuals. Then

“John Doe” may be used if needed, but Plaintiff must describe as fully as possible each unknown

Defendant by stating what shift or shifts he or she worked and by further describing his or her

appearance. If a “John Doe” Defendant cannot be identified sufficiently in order to summon that

individual to appear, dismissal of that Defendant from this action may be warranted. See Fed. R.

Civ. P. 4(m); Wayne v. Jarvis, 197 F.3d 1098 (11th Cir. 1999).

1

 Inmates in other cases have successfully identified “John Doe” Defendants by submitting an inmate request

or grievance with a copy of this order to an appropriate official.
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Plaintiff shall

seek to determine the identity of each of the nine unidentified Defendants. If Plaintiff determines

the identity of the “Doe” Defendants, he shall identify them by name in a notice to the court. If

Plaintiff is unable to ascertain an individual’s identity, he shall inform the court, in a sworn affidavit,

of the steps taken to discover each individual’s identity. Additionally, he shall provide a physical

description of each unidentified Defendant and the shift that he or she worked.

2. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation of

dismissal of the unidentified Defendants from this action.

At Pensacola, Florida this 29th day of June 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cv65/MCR/EMT
----

Exhibit 32.1

| CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     |
|-----------------------------------------------|
| 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                        |
| AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                        |
| SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantic Resources Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge: 

|           1.      | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |
|           2.      | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                                                      |

Date: April , 2008 

/s/ Raffi Khorchidian   ---------------------------------  Raffi Khorchidian, President and C.E.O.   (Principal Executive Officer) 

----