alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FRANKLIN ZORILLA, 

Petitioner, 

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cv392-RH/WCS

ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.,

Respondents. 

_________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an order filed

September 17, 2010, Petitioner was directed to file either pay the $5.00 filing fee or,

alternatively, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis by October 15, 2010. Doc. 3. 

Petitioner was specifically warned that a recommendation would be made that this case

be dismissed if there was a failure to comply with that order. To date, no response has

been received from the Petitioner. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.
Page 2 of 2

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Petitioner has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, his petition should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

Petitioner shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Petitioner a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Petitioner may do so by

filing a motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on November 1, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv392-RH/WCS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MICHAEL A. GRIFFIN,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:09-cv-307-RS-CJK

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16). No 

objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and 

incorporated in this Order.

2. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED 

with prejudice. 

3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner has not 

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on June 11, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:09-cv-00307-RS-CJK Document 19 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5536]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, ``A Longitudinal MRI Study of 
Infants at Risk for Autism''.
    Date: November 28, 2007.
    Time: 11 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 
5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96f5fef7f8f1f8d6fbf7fffab8f8fffeb8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="600308010e070e200d01090c4e0e09084e070f16">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS).


    Dated: October 30, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5536 Filed 11-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      18,668,703              11,734,705
<SECURITIES>                                 1,442,814                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                              250,688,138              89,328,928
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,654,114               1,078,992
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                         619,222                 314,169
<DEPRECIATION>                                 202,938                  90,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             272,354,946             101,273,089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      184,524,758              74,552,113
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        96,703                  62,150
<OTHER-SE>                                  87,733,485              26,658,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               272,354,946             101,273,089
<SALES>                                     27,745,077              12,015,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,327,929              12,249,953
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,219,372               3,326,994
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,315,122                 656,116
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,921,330               3,408,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,872,105                 568,422
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,877,257                  38,860
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,994,848                 529,562
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0                       0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .99                     .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .96                     .13
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
 CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of United American
Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004, I certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:
 
 (1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of United American Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    the
      information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
      ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of United American
      Corporation.
 
 
 By:
    Benoit
      LalibertéName:
    Benoit
      LalibertéTitle:
    Chief
      Executive Officer,
      Chief
      Financial Officer, DirectorDate:
    April
      29, 2005
 
 
 
 1
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5205 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, Nevada, as 

the ‘‘Sergeant Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5205 EH

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT KENNETH ERIC BOSTIC POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 701 6th Street in Hawthorne, 

5 Nevada, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant 

6 Kenneth Eric Bostic Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Kenneth 

11 Eric Bostic Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5205 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostBostic Post Office’’. thorne, Nevada, as the ‘‘Sergeant Kenneth Eric al Service located at 701 6th Street in Haw-
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 225 (Friday, November 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 65709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5827]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, December 6, 2007, 10 a.m.

PLACE: Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Open to the public.

Matter to be Considered: 

Upholstered Furniture

    The staff will brief the Commission on its briefing package 
regarding regulatory options on upholstered furniture flammability.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: November 20, 2007.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-5827 Filed 11-20-07; 1:02 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-M
Exhibit 10(m)

THIRD AMENDMENT TO EFH SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN

Pursuant to
the authority of the Board of Directors of Energy Future Holdings Corp., and the provisions of Section 5.1 thereof, the EFH Second Supplemental Retirement Plan (Plan), as amended and restated as of October 10, 2007, is hereby
amended in the following respects only, effective, except as otherwise stated, as of January 1, 2010.



| | (1) | The Plan is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (c) to Section 4.2 to read as follows:
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) Notwithstanding subsection (b), effective with respect to any Participant who experiences a Separation from
Service on or after March 1, 2010, if the lump sum present value of a Participants entire vested Supplemental Retirement Benefit under the Plan is $5,000 or less upon his or her Separation from Service, the present value of such
Participants Supplemental Retirement Benefit shall be paid to such Participant in a single lump sum upon such Participants Separation from Service.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and as conclusive evidence of the adoption of the foregoing instrument Amendment to the EFH
Second Supplemental Retirement Plan, the Board of Directors of Energy Future Holdings Corp. has caused these presents to be duly executed in the name and on the behalf of Energy Future Holdings Corp., by an authorized officer thereof, thereunto duly
authorized this 21stday of April, 2010.



ENERGY FUTURE HOLDINGS CORP./s/    RICHARD LANDYRichard Landy,Executive Vice President, Human Resources
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00128

- CR

S HANNON J ERMAINE G ARRETT

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

Criminal District Court N o. 2

of Tarrant County (1451192D)

February 6, 2020

Opinion by Justice Womack

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s / Dana Womack

Justice Dana Womack
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Porfavor, Inc., for the Quarterly ended September 30, 2009, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Porfavor, Inc., for the Quarterly ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly ended September 30, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of International Industrial Enterprises.  By: /s/ Boyd V. ApplegateName: Boyd V. ApplegateTitle: CEO, President, DirectorDate: November 30, 2009By: /s/ Christine M. ApplegateName: Christine M. ApplegateTitle: CFO, Controller, Treasurer, Secretary, DirectorDate: November 30, 2009
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit ____________ 

No. 23-40270 

Summary Calendar 

____________ 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Gerardo Quezada-Lopez, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

______________________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:23-CR-16-1 

______________________________ 

Before King, Haynes, and Graves, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gerardo 

Quezada-Lopez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Quezada-Lopez has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

_____________________ 

*

 This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

November 14, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 23-40270 Document: 00516967560 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2023
No. 23-40270 

2 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 23-40270 Document: 00516967560 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/14/2023
Exhibit
32.01








SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rovi Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alfred J. Amoroso
certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted), that to the best of his knowledge:





(a) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)), and





(b) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
hereunto signed this Certification as of November 5, 2009.




/s/ Alfred
      J. AmorosoAlfred
      J. AmorosoChief
      Executive Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 3:10cr43/MCR 

TRACY HULL

 /

STANDING ORDER AND NOTICE TO

RETAINED CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS

Retained criminal defense attorneys are expected to make financial arrangements

that are satisfactory to themselves and sufficient to provide for representation of each

defendant until the conclusion of the defendant's case. Unless this court, within seven

days after arraignment, is notified in writing of counsel's withdrawal because of the

defendant's failure to make satisfactory financial arrangements, this court will expect

retained counsel to represent the defendant until the conclusion of the case. Failure of a

defendant to pay sums owed for attorney's fees or failure of counsel to collect a sum

sufficient to compensate for all the services usually required of defense counsel will not

constitute good cause for withdrawal after the seven-day period has expired. See Local

Rule 11.1(1)(G).

Every defendant has a right to appeal from any conviction. Thus, the further

expectation of this court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 

is that retained counsel, in making satisfactory financial arrangements, will contemplate

services to be rendered upon appeal.1

In the event retained counsel files a motion to withdraw and a defendant moves the

court to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and/or for appointment of Criminal Justice

 See 11th Circuit Rules Addendum Four, "Eleventh Circuit Plan under the Criminal Justice Plan," § (d).

1
Page 2 of 2

Act appellate counsel, retained counsel will, in addition to the information required under

Form 4 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure, be required to fully disclose in camera (1) the

attorney's fee agreement and the total amount of such fees and costs paid to date, in cash

or otherwise; (2) by whom fees and costs were paid; (3) any fees and costs remaining

unpaid and the complete terms of agreements concerning payment thereof; (4) the costs

actually incurred to date; and (5) a detailed description of services actually rendered to

date, including a record of the itemized time (to the nearest 1/10 of an hour) for each

service, both in-court and out-of-court, and the total time. Note that matters involving the

receipt of fees from a client are not generally privileged, United States v. Sims, 845 F.2d

1564 (11th Cir. 1988); In re Slaughter, 694 F.2d 1258 (11th Cir. 1982); In re Grand Jury

Proceedings: United States v. Jones, 517 F.2d 666 (5th Cir. 1975). All such information

submitted will be viewed in camera by the court for the purpose of deciding the

defendant's motion, and will be a part of the record (sealed if requested) in this case.

Except in extraordinary circumstances, this policy will be strictly followed.

DONE and ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:10cr43/MCR
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023458
<NAME> AEI INVOME& GROWTH FUND XXII LTD PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,808,792
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,808,792
<PP&E>                                         762,004
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (668)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,570,128     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          261,781
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,308,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,570,128
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,807
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,007
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,200)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.88)
        


</TABLE>