alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

NICHOLAS HARRIS and

KRISTI CHIODO, Individually and

on Behalf Of Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 3:10-cv-134/LAC/MD

TRANSOCEAN, LTD. (TRANSOCEAN ENTITY);

BP, PLC; TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE

DEEPWATER DRILLING, INC., (TRANSOCEAN

ENTITY); TRANSOCEAN DEEPWATER, INC,

(TRANSOCEAN ENTITY); BP PRODUCTS

NORTH AMERICA, INC.; BP AMERICA, INC.;

CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

and, HALIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER STAYING ALL PROCEEDINGS

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Motions to Stay Proceedings filed by

Defendants BP Products North America Inc. and BP America Inc. (doc. 10), and by

Defendant Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. (doc. 15). Plaintiffs have filed a response (doc.

29). The complaint seeks damages arising out of the recent oil rig disaster in the Gulf of

Mexico. Defendants request that this Court stay all proceedings in this case pending a ruling
from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) on whether numerous related

cases involving the disaster, including the instant cause, will be consolidated. Upon review

of the motions and response, the Court finds the stay will preserve judicial resources in the

likely event that the cases are consolidated. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND

ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Motions to Stay Proceedings (docs. 10, 15) are hereby GRANTED.

2. All proceedings in this case are temporarily stayed, pending the JPML’s final

decision on whether to consolidate this and other actions arising from the BP oil rig

explosion and subsequent oil spill.

3. The Parties shall file a status report as soon as a decision has been made by the

JPML on the matter of consolidation.

ORDERED on this 3rd day of June, 2010.

s/L.A. Collier

Lacey A. Collier

Senior United States District Judge

Case No. 3:10-cv-134/LAC/MD Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 226 (Monday, November 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 66018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5803]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Seventy-Fourth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 159: Global 
Positioning System (GPS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 159 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 159: Global Positioning System.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 4-7, 2007, from 9 a.m. to 4:30 
p.m. (unless stated otherwise).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc. 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 159 meeting. Note: Specific 
working group sessions will be held December 4-7, 2007. The plenary 
agenda will include:
    <bullet> December 4:
     <bullet> All Day, Working Group 6, GPS/Interface, ARINC Room.
    <bullet> December 5:
     <bullet> All Day, Working Group 6, GPS/Interface, ARINC Room.
    <bullet> December 6:
     <bullet> All Day Working Group 6, GPS/Interface, ARINC Room.
    <bullet> December 7:
     <bullet> Opening Plenary Session (Chairman's Remarks, 
Introductions).
     <bullet> Approval of Summary of the Seventy-Third Meeting Held 
September 21, 2007 RTCA Paper No. 274-07/SCI59-954.
     <bullet> Consider for Approval--Revised DO-235A-Assessment of 
Radio Frequency Interface Relevant to the GNSS, RTCA Paper No. 261-07/
SCI59-953.
     <bullet> Review/Approval--Velocity Accuracy, Figure of Merit and 
Associated Test Text--GRAS MOPS.
     <bullet> Closing Plenary Session (Assignment/Review of Future 
Work, Other Business, Date and Place of Next Meeting).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 15, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-5803 Filed 11-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
# C_2010063EN.01000101.xml

| 13.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/1

---

2010/C 63/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 51, 27.2.2010

OJ C 51, 27.2.2010

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 37, 13.2.2010

OJ C 24, 30.1.2010

OJ C 11, 16.1.2010

OJ C 312, 19.12.2009

OJ C 297, 5.12.2009

OJ C 282, 21.11.2009

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantic Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:   March 15, 2010   /s/ Raffi Khorchidian---------------------------------
Raffi Khorchidian, 
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LOUIS ROBENSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:09cv365/RV/MD

DAVID ELLIS, et al.,

Defendants.

 

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated September 23, 2009. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice to refiling

accompanied by the payment of the full $350.00 filing fee.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of October, 2009.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BRIAN A. LEONARD,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv248-RH/EMT

N. ROBINSON et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 9. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is DISMISSED

without prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on January 31, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
# C_2009295EN.01000602.xml

| 4.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5662 — NIBC/ABN AMRO FUND/MID OCEAN GROUP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 295/06

On 16 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5662. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5662. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Astro Aerospace Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce Bent, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

/s/Bruce Bent

Bruce Bent

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer

 

November 19, 2019
**Exhibit 23(a)**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporationby reference in Registration Statement No. 333-165860 on Form S-3 of our reports dated February 17, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Energy Future Holdings Corp. and subsidiaries (“EFH Corp.”) (whichreport expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding EFH Corp.’s adoption of amended consolidation accounting standards related to variable interest entities and EFH Corp.’s adoption of amended guidanceregarding transfers of financial assets effective January 1, 2010, on a prospective basis) and the effectiveness of EFH Corp.’s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of EFH Corp. for theyear ended December 31, 2010. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Dallas, Texas 

February 17, 2011
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 28, 2013

s0520

Order 

Clerk

May 28, 2013

146551

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146551

COA: 303097

Wayne CC: 10-008826-FH

WILLIAM ARTHUR HOEFLING,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 13, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the period ended January 31, 2011, I, William A. Shumaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended January 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 15, 2011



/s/ William A. ShumakerWilliam A. ShumakerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### NORTH CAROLINA STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. WESLEY SWANN and Wife, SADIE SWANN.

(Filed 22 September, 1965.)

Appeal by defendants from *Campbell, J.,*February-March, 1965 Civil Session, BtjNCombe Superior Court.

The State Highway Commission instituted this proceeding to condemn for highway purposes an easement in perpetuity over a certain lot of land owned and occupied by the defendants in the City of Ashe-ville. The lot contained 1.78 acres and the easement covered 0.77 acres. The Commission filed its declaration of taking and deposited the sum of $3,500.00 as its estimate of the just compensation due for the taking. The defendants refused to accept the tender, alleged they were due $15,000.00, and demanded a jury trial.

*346In the Superior Court both parties offered evidence. According to the Commission’s witnesses the defendants were due $1,700.00 to $2,-100.00; according to the defendants’ witnesses, $14,500.00 to $15,000.00. The jury awarded the defendants $2,000.00. From judgment on the verdict, they appealed.

' *T. W. Bruton, Attorney General, Harrison Lewis, Deputy Attorney General, William W. Melvin, Assistant Attorney General, Millard B. Rich, Jr., Trial Attorney, Lamar Gudger, Associate Counsel for the State.*

*Robert S.. Cahoon for defendant appellants.*

PeR CuRiAM.

The defendants assign as error the admission of certain evidence offered by the plaintiff and the exclusion of certain evidence offered by the defendants. The assignments are not sustained insofar as they relate to the evidence admitted by the court. The evidence appears to have been competent for the purposes for which it was offered.

Insofar as the assignments relate to the evidence which the court excluded, the assignments cannot be sustained for the reason that the record fails to disclose what the witnesses would have testified to if permitted. Hence, error in the exclusion of evidence does not appear. *N. C. State Highway Comm. v. Privett,*246 N.C. 501, 99 S.E. 2d 61.

The refusal of the court to set aside the verdict was discretionary and, in the absence of abuse is not subject to review. In the trial and judgment, we find

No error.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

GAINESVILLE DIVISION 

MARIA PARSONS and MICHAEL PARSONS, et al., 

on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. Case No.: 1:10-cv-00071-MP-AK 

KOPPERS INC., f/k/a KOPPERS INDUSTRIES INC., 

CABOT CORPORATION and BEAZER EAST, INC. 

 

 Defendants. 

 / 

DEFENDANT CABOT CORPORATION’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME 

COMES NOW Defendant CABOT CORPORATION by its undersigned attorneys and 

hereby moves the Court for entry of an order extending the deadline for which CABOT 

CORPORATION is to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint by an additional fifteen (15) days. 

Plaintiffs’ counsel has no objections to the extension. 

WHEREFORE, CABOT CORPORATION respectfully requests that the Court enter an 

order granting its extension to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint by an additional fifteen (15) days. 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all 

CM/ECF participants: Jordan L. Chaikin, Esquire, Parker Waichman Alonso, LLP, 3301 Bonita 

Case 1:10-cv-00071-MP-AK Document 6 Filed 08/31/10 Page 1 of 2
Beach Road, Suite 101, Bonita Springs, FL 34134, this 31st day of August, 2010. 

DELL GRAHAM, P.A. 

/s/ John D. Jopling 

 John D. Jopling 

Florida Bar No. 348104 

Counsel for Defendant 

 203 N.E. 1st St. 

 Gainesville, FL 32601 

 Phone: (352) 372-4381 

 Fax: (352) 376-7415 

 Email: jjopling@dellgraham.com

Case 1:10-cv-00071-MP-AK Document 6 Filed 08/31/10 Page 2 of 2
|   | (1) | The      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 15, 2010 | By:                                                                                                                                              | /s/ Frederick      Antonelli |
|------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                         | Frederick      Antonelli                                                                                                                                   |
|                         | Principal      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,Director(Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial andAccounting      Officer) |

----
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:10cr83/MCR

TAURUS PARKER

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there has been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(2), the plea of

guilty of the defendant, TAURUS PARKER, to the three count indictment against him

is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as

directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ALICE FRAME,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00142-MP -GRJ

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 22, the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the motion to remand, filed by the defendant, and agreed

to by the plaintiff, be granted. The Court agrees that a remand is appropriate under sentence four

of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

A remand under sentence four is considered a final judgment. Bergen v. Commissioner,

454 F.3d 1273 (11th Cir. 2006). Thus, absent a court order stating otherwise, a successful

Plaintiff’s counsel would normally have fourteen days after the order of remand to file a motion

with the District Court requesting an award of attorney fees. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2)(B). This

Rule has been interpreted by the Eleventh Circuit to even apply to a request for fees to be paid

from Plaintiff’s past due benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). Bergen, 454 F.3d at

1277-78. However, Plaintiff's counsel in such a case will not know the amount of benefits - and

therefore fees - until after the Commissioner awards benefits, which typically takes longer than 

Case 1:10-cv-00142-MP-GRJ Document 23 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

fourteen days after the entry of judgment. Therefore, an extension of time to seek such fees is

warranted, and was recommended by the Bergen opinion. Id. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

This Clerk is directed to enter final judgment remanding this case to the Commissioner

under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings in order

to evaluate plaintiff’s mental functioning and specifically determine whether her

condition meets or equals any listed impairment at Step Three of the sequential

evaluation process.

Pursuant to Bergen, proceedings on attorney fees under the Social Security Act, 42

U.S.C. § 406(b) are stayed until the matter is fully adjudicated upon remand. The

Plaintiff shall file a motion to award fees under 406(b) within 30 days after counsel

receives notice from the Defendant Commissioner as to Plaintiff’s past due benefits.

This stay relates only to attorney fee proceedings under § 406(b) of the Social Security

Act, not to attorney fee proceedings under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §

2412, the latter of which may be adjudicated at this time. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00142-MP -GRJ

Case 1:10-cv-00142-MP-GRJ Document 23 Filed 05/23/11 Page 2 of 2
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


CA2010201EN.01000301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 23.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 201/3 |

---

Corrigendum to the notice of competitions EPSO/AD/180-181-182/10

(
[Official Journal of the European Union C 110 A of 29 April 2010](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2010_110_A_TOC)
)

(2010/C 201 A/03)

On page 13, in section IV.2, last paragraph:

for:

‘The number of candidates admitted to the assessment centre will be approximately three times the number of successful candidates indicated in the competition notice and will be published on EPSO's website (www.eu-careers.eu).’,

read:

‘The number of candidates admitted to the assessment centre will not exceed three times the number of successful candidates indicated in the competition notice and will be published on EPSO's website (www.eu-careers.eu).’;

On page 14, in section V.4:

for:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘4. | Marking | | ... Specific competencies Marking: 0 — 100 Pass mark: 50 points ...’, |

read:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘4. | Marking | | ... Specific competencies Marking: 0 — 100 Pass mark: 50 points Knowledge of main language (language 1) Marking: 0 — 10 Pass mark: 8 points ...’. |

---