alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SIDNEY MARTS,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv240/LAC/EMT

WALTER A. McNEIL,

Respondent. 

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated January 13, 2011 (Doc. 31). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the

objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Petitioner’s “Motion to Vacate, Set Aside Judgment w/Motion for Entry of Default

Judgement [sic]” (Doc. 30) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26 day of January, 2011. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      608
<ALLOWANCES>                                       228
<INVENTORY>                                      2,407
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,255
<PP&E>                                           1,134
<DEPRECIATION>                                     854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,553
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,973
<BONDS>                                             86
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,361
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,907)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,553
<SALES>                                          6,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,026
<CGS>                                            5,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     9<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,843)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,843)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,843)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.92)
<FN>
<F1>Bad debt expense of 9 is included in the 1,290 reported as General and
Administrative expenses.
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      No. 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Quarter Report of Title Starts Online, Inc., a Nevada
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30,
      2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:





(1)
        the Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended; and





(2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
                November 12, 2008
            By:
            */s/Mark
                DeFoor*Name:
                Mark DeFoorTitle:
                President and Chief Executive
                Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0577

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RUSSELL DEAN KORTAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 24, 2021, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 16 2021

08/16/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0577
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OFKNOLOGY, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§ 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as the principal financial officer ofKnology, Inc. (the “Company”) that, to his knowledge, this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (this “Report”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: March 15, 2010 

 

This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwisesubject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of anygeneral incorporation language in any filings.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section is 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel Omics.
    Date: December 7, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Martina Schmidt, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for 
Complementary, & Alternative Medicine, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., 
Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3456, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d4e5e55505459505c7d505c545113535455135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a59494247434e474b6a474b434604444342044d455c">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 2, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5621 Filed 11-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2009244EN.01000101.xml

| 10.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/1

---

2009/C 244/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 233, 26.9.2009

OJ C 233, 26.9.2009

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 220, 12.9.2009

OJ C 205, 29.8.2009

OJ C 193, 15.8.2009

OJ C 180, 1.8.2009

OJ C 167, 18.7.2009

OJ C 153, 4.7.2009

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JAMES BIRDSONG and

KATHY BIRDSONG,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-196/RS-MD

THOMAS EHLKE and OCEAN

TERRACE CONDOMINIUM ASS’N,

INC., of PANAMA CITY,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

THOMAS EHLKE, 

Third-Party Plaintiff,

vs. 

PEOPLES FIRST INSURANCE SVS, LLC,

Third-Party Defendant. 

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Before me is the Joint Notice of Advisement of Settlement indicating that the 

parties have reached an agreement resolving “all claims asserted by the Plaintiffs and the 

Third Party Plaintiff (Doc. 51).” Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. 16.2 it is ordered: 

1. The case is dismissed from the active docket of the court. 
2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves 

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this 

Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative purposes, 

and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is direct to 

close the case in its entirety for all purposes. 

4. All pending motions are denied as moot. 

ORDERED on February 9, 2011

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-2033

ANA Y MARTINEZ HERNANDEZ

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: April 20, 2023 Decided: June 1, 2023

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Robert J. Harris, Woodbridge, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton,

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation 

Counsel, Robbin K. Blaya, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2033 Doc: 26 Filed: 06/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Ana Martinez Hernandez (Martinez), a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions 

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her motion to 

reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and Martinez’s claims and find 

no abuse of discretion. See Narine v. Holder, 559 F.3d 246, 249 (4th Cir. 2009); Jean v. 

Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 (4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review

for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re Martinez Hernandez (B.I.A. Sept. 1, 2022). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-2033 Doc: 26 Filed: 06/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STATE OF FLORIDA, by and )

 through BILL McCOLLUM, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

 v. ) Case No. 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT )

 OF HEALTH AND HUMAN )

 SERVICES, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

ERRATA

Defendants, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby respectfully submit this Errata

and state as follows:

1. On June 16, 2010, Defendants filed their motion to dismiss, together with a

memorandum in support of that motion. See Doc. No. 55.

2. Technical difficulties required Defendants to file a scanned PDF of their

memorandum in support, which had poor resolution.

3. Attached hereto is a PDF of the memorandum in support with improved

resolution. The contents of the memorandum are unchanged.

Dated: June 17, 2010 Respectfully submitted, 

TONY WEST

Assistant Attorney General

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 56 Filed 06/17/10 Page 1 of 3
IAN HEATH GERSHENGORN

Deputy Assistant Attorney General

THOMAS F. KIRWIN 

United States Attorney

SHEILA LIEBER

Deputy Director

 /s/ Eric Beckenhauer 

BRIAN G. KENNEDY, D.C. Bar No. 228726

Senior Trial Counsel

ERIC B. BECKENHAUER, Cal. Bar No. 237526

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

20 Massachusetts Ave. NW

Washington, DC 20530

Telephone: (202) 514-3338

Facsimile: (202) 616-8470

E-mail: eric.beckenhauer@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

2

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 56 Filed 06/17/10 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on June 17, 2010, the foregoing document was filed with the Clerk

of Court via the CM/ECF system, causing it to be served on Plaintiffs’ counsel of record.

 /s/ Eric B. Beckenhauer 

ERIC B. BECKENHAUER

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 56 Filed 06/17/10 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. KILLIAN

No. 119 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 446.

Petition for writ of certiorari is treated as an appeal by reason of the dissent in the Court of Appeals decision. Appeal allowed 1 August 1972.
# CE2013261EN.01005001.xml

| 10.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 261/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 261/50

---

Thursday 10 May 2012Consideration in committee of written questions that have not been answered (interpretation of Rule 117(3) of the Rules of Procedure)

P7_TA(2012)0204

European Parliament decision of 10 May 2012 concerning consideration in committee of written questions that have not been answered (interpretation of Rule 117(3) of the Rules of Procedure)

2013/C 261 E/10

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the letter of 27 April 2012 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the letter of 27 April 2012 from the Chair of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs,

| — | having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 211 of its Rules of Procedure,

| 1. | Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 117(3):
  ‘Since the chair of a committee is empowered by Rule 193(1) to convene a meeting of that committee, it is up to him, in the interest of the proper organisation of proceedings, to determine the draft agenda of the meeting he has convened. This prerogative is without prejudice to his obligation under Rule 117(3) to place a written question, at the request of its author, on the draft agenda for the next meeting of the committee. However, the chair has the discretionary power to propose, in the light of political priorities, the agenda and procedural arrangements for the meeting (e.g. a procedure without debate, possibly with the adoption of a decision on action to be taken, or, where appropriate, a recommendation to carry over the item to a subsequent meeting).’ |
| --- | --- |

1.

Decides to append the following interpretation to Rule 117(3):

‘Since the chair of a committee is empowered by Rule 193(1) to convene a meeting of that committee, it is up to him, in the interest of the proper organisation of proceedings, to determine the draft agenda of the meeting he has convened. This prerogative is without prejudice to his obligation under Rule 117(3) to place a written question, at the request of its author, on the draft agenda for the next meeting of the committee. However, the chair has the discretionary power to propose, in the light of political priorities, the agenda and procedural arrangements for the meeting (e.g. a procedure without debate, possibly with the adoption of a decision on action to be taken, or, where appropriate, a recommendation to carry over the item to a subsequent meeting).’

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and the Commission, for information.

---
[No. 900.]

#### TOWN OF GOLD HILL, Appellant, *v.*ALEXANDER BRISACHER, Respondent.

Violation or Town Ordinance — Criminal Cause — Jurisdiction.—The trial of a party charged with violation of a town ordinance is a criminal case. The charge does not amount to a felony, and this court has no jurisdiction in such a case.

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, Storey County.

The facts appear in the opinion.

*J. H. Harris, Town Attorney,*and *B. H Taylor,*for Appellant.

*William Woodburn,*for Respondent.

By the Court,

Beatty, C. J.:

The defendant was convicted in a justice’s court of violating an ordinance of Gold Hill and adjudged to pay a fine and to be imprisoned in default of payment. He appealed to the district court of Storey county, where a judgment was rendered in his favor. From that judgment this ap*53peal is taken. The defendant moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the supreme court has no jurisdiction in cases of this character. The motion must prevail. This is not a “ case at law” involving the legality of a municipal fine. We decided in *State*v. *Rising,*10 Nev. 103, that the expressions “all cases at law” and “all criminal cases,” as used in the constitution, were intended to designate distinct categories, mutually exclusive. This is clearly a criminal case, and can not, therefore, be one of the “cases at law ” in which this court has appellate jurisdiction; and since the offense charged does not amount to a felony, we have no jurisdiction of it as a criminal case. (Constitution, art. VI., sec. 4.)

The appeal is dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Study.                    

*Date:*                         November 14, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 1 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 800, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Michael L. Bloom, PhD, MBA., Scientific Review Administrator, EP Review Branch, NIH/NIAMS, One Democracy Plaza, Room 820, MSC 4872, 6701 Democracy Blvd, Bethesda, MD 20892-4872, 301-594-4953,                         *Michael_Bloom@nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 24, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5391 Filed 10-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
|   | 1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Brian T. Cahill                   |   |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
|   | Dated: February 9, 2011               |   |   |