alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Real Goods Solar, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2010, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Schaeffer, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 8, 2010



/s/ John SchaefferJohn SchaefferPresident (principal executive
officer)
#### ENROUGHTY v. INDUSTRIES, INC.

No. 13 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 400.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 March 1972.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 17, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30482 Summary Calendar

KIRK RANDALL MENARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, on behalf of National Instant Criminal Background System, on behalf of United States Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, on behalf of Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:03-CV-1399

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Kirk Randall Menard appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants in his civil lawsuit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 925A, arising out of his inability to purchase firearms as a result of his 1991 felony convictions. Menard argues that he was improperly denied the right to purchase firearms because the Louisiana Constitution restored his civil rights and his convictions were set aside and expunged. He alsoNo. 04-30482 -2- argues that the National Instant Criminal Background Check System ("NICS") erroneously calculated when the state firearms disability ends based on an improper determination of when his probation was completed. Having conducted a de novo review, see Gibson v. U.S. Postal
Serv. , 380 F.3d 886, 888 (5th Cir. 2004), we conclude that for substantially the same reasons articulated by the district court in its dismissal order, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED. Menard also argues that the district court failed to recognize that his claim that L A . R EV . S TAT . § 14:95.1 is unconstitutional presented a genuine issue in controversy. We conclude that this issue is inadequately briefed. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
# CE2010298EN.01021501.xml

| 4.11.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 298/215 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 298/215

---

Corrigendum to the minutes of the sitting of 5 May 2010

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 188 E of 13 July 2010
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 188 E of 13 July 2010

2010/C 298 E/05

Page 28, Item ‘13.50. 2008 discharge: European Police College (vote)’, last paragraph:

for:

‘Closure of the accounts was thereby approved (see Annex V, Article 5(1)(a) to the Rules of Procedure).’

read:

‘Closure of the accounts was postponed (see Annex VI, Article 5(1)(b) to the Rules of Procedure).’

Pages 15 to 28, Items 13.4 to 13.50 (votes):

for:

Annex V

read:

Annex VI.

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 231 (Monday, December 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67937-67938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5931]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notices

Date AND Time:  Thursday, December 6, 2007, a closed meeting will be 
held at the conclusion of the open meeting.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. This meeting will be closed 
to the public.

Items to be Discussed: 
Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, Sec.  438(b), and Title 26, 
U.S.C.
Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.

[[Page 67938]]

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

Date AND Time:  Thursday, December 6, 2007, at 10 a.m.

Place:  999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

Status:  This meeting will be open to the public.

Items to be Discussed: 
Correction and Approval of Minutes.
FEC Service Awards.
Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-23: Independence Party of New York, by A. 
Joshua Ehrlich, Esq.
Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-24: Jim Burkee/Jeff Walz.
Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-25: Holland & Knight, LLP, by Christopher 
DeLacy, Esq.
Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-26: State Representative Aaron Schock and 
Citizens for Schock, by Donald F. McGahn, II, Esq.
Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-27: ActBlue by Jonathan Zucker, Esq.
Management and Administrative Matters.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-5931 Filed 11-29-07; 2:43 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Case 5:10-cv-00226-RS-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/01/10 Page 1 of 4
Case 5:10-cv-00226-RS-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/01/10 Page 2 of 4
Case 5:10-cv-00226-RS-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/01/10 Page 3 of 4
Case 5:10-cv-00226-RS-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/01/10 Page 4 of 4
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ANTHONY J. FAILS,

Petitioner,

v. 3:10cv403/MCR/MD

UNITED STATES,

Respondent.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated February 11, 2011. The petitioner has been furnished a copy

of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petitioner’s motion to proceedinforma pauperis (doc 5.) is DENIED.

3. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for petitioner’s failure

to comply with an order of the court. 

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of March, 2011.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 1 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 2 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 3 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 4 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 5 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 6 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 7 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 8 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 9 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 10 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 11 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 12 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 13 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 14 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 15 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 16 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 17 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 18 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 19 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 20 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 21 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 22 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 23 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 24 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 25 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 26 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 27 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 28 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 29 of 30
Case 4:10-cv-00436-RH-WCS Document 37 Filed 02/22/11 Page 30 of 30
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 69 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 216.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1978.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING ANDFINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grant Hartford Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), we, Eric Sauve, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David Gilmer, Principal FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 15, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JUSTIN EVERETT COOPER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-179-SPM-WCS

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 11). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy and has been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report

and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 11) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

3. All pending motions are denied as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this seventh day of October, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
# C_2009068EN.01003902.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/39

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5474 — Lagardere/Sumitomo/HFG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 68/09)

On 16 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5474. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5474. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

IRA LEE DENSON, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00352-MP-CJK

EDWIN G BUSS, MICHAEL D CREWS, WALTER A MCNEIL, 

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated . (Doc. 22). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has passed, and none have

been filed. Upon consideration, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should

be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order. 

2. This case is dismissed as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file.

3. No certificate of appealability is appropriate in this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2013

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# C_2010158EN.01000402.xml

| 18.6.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 158/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 158/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5811 — Erste Bank/ASK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 158/03

On 27 May 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5811. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5811. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### GLADSTEIN v. SOUTH SQUARE ASSOC.

No. 13 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 171.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 March 1979.
# C_2010077EN.01000101.xml

| 26.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 77/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 77/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5535 — Renesas Technology/NEC Electronics)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 77/01

On 2 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5535. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5535. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
# C_2010335EN.01000101.xml

| 11.12.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6025 — Ardagh/Impress)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 335/01

On 29 November 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6025. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M6025. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF

INDEPENDENT FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Independent Film Development Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenneth Eade, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.   Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 20, 2010



/s/ Kenneth G. Eade

Kenneth G. Eade

Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CYNTHIA A. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:10cv151-WS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

May 9, 2011. See Doc. 17. In essence, the magistrate judge recommends that the 

Commissioner's decision to deny the plaintiff's application for benefits be affirmed. The

plaintiff has filed a one-sentence objection (doc. 18) to the report and recommendation.

Having carefully reviewed the administrative record as well as the record in this

court, the court finds that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be

adopted. Because substantial evidence supported the Commissioner's decision to deny

benefits, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 17) is ADOPTED

and incorporated into this order of the court.

2. The Commissioner's decision to deny the plaintiff's application for benefits is

Case 3:10-cv-00151-WS-CJK Document 19 Filed 05/27/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

AFFIRMED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of May , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00151-WS-CJK Document 19 Filed 05/27/11 Page 2 of 2