alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# DATE & TIME:

Friday, December 14, 2007, at 1 p.m.

# PLACE:

999 E. Street, NW., Washington, DC. (Ninth Floor)

# STATUS:

This meeting will be open to the public.

## Items To Be Discussed

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Election of Officers.

Future Meeting Dates.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-27: ActBlue by Jonathan Zucker, Esq.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-28: Representatives Kevin McCarthy and Devin Nunes, by Charles Bell, Jr., Esq. and Ashlee Titus, Esq.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-31: John Edwards for President, by Lora Haggard, CFO.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-34: Representative Jesse L. Jackson, Jr.

Electioneering Communications Explanation and Justification.

Management and Administrative Matters.

# DATE & TIME:

Tuesday, December 18, 2007, 10 a.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

This meeting will be closed to the public.

## Items To Be Discussed

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-6011  Filed 12-6-07; 2:50 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2465 

To enact as law certain regulations relating to the taking of double-crested 

cormorants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2019 

Mr. COTTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To enact as law certain regulations relating to the taking 

of double-crested cormorants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cormorant Relief Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REGULATIONS RELATING TO THE TAKING OF DOU6 BLE-CRESTED CORMORANTS. 

7 (a) FORCE AND EFFECT.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), 

9 sections 21.47 and 21.48 of title 50, Code of FedVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:17 Sep 11, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2465.IS S2465

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2465 IS

1 eral Regulations (as in effect on January 1, 2016), 

2 shall have the force and effect of law. 

3 (2) PUBLIC NOTICE.—The Secretary of the In4 terior, acting through the Director of the United 

5 States Fish and Wildlife Service (referred to in this 

6 section as the ‘‘Secretary’’), shall notify the public of 

7 the authority provided by paragraph (1) in a manner 

8 determined to be appropriate by the Secretary. 

9 (b) SUNSET.—The authority provided by subsection 

10 (a)(1) shall terminate on the effective date of a regulation 

11 promulgated by the Secretary after the date of enactment 

12 of this Act to control depredation of double-crested cor13 morant populations. 

14 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec15 tion limits the authority of the Secretary to promulgate 

16 regulations relating to the taking of double-crested cor17 morants under any other law. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANGELA DENISE KILGORE,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00407-MP-WCS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 6, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, which recommends that petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Angela Denise Kilgore

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging her sentence imposed in the Eastern District of

Tennessee be denied. Petitioner has not objected to the recommendation, and the time for doing

so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 6, is ACCEPTED

and incorporated herein.

2. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Doc.1, is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of June, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00407-MP-WCS Document 9 Filed 06/24/11 Page 1 of 1
### IN THE CO URT OF APPEALS OF TE NNE SS EE
AT NASHVILL E

Ju ne 25 , 20 09 Ses si on

COREY GREE NE, E T A L 

### . v. YASEE N TIT I
d/ b/ a CRUSH NIGH T CLUB, E T A L



### .

A p p e a l f r o m t h e C i r c u i t C o u r t f o r D a v i d s o n C o u n t y
N o

. 0 6 C 1 1 8 T h o m a s B r o t h e r s , J u d g e

N o

. M 2 0 0 8

- 0 2 7 8 8

- C O A

- R 3

- C V

- F i l e d J a n u a r y 1 1
, 2 0 1 0

J U D G E D

. M IC H A E L S W IN E Y
, c o n c u r r i n g i n p a r t a n d d i s s e n t i n g i n p a r t

.

I c o n c u r i n t h e m a

j o r i t y ’ s d e c i s i o n t o a f

f i r m t h e j u d g m e n t o f t h e T r i a l C o u r t

g r a n t i n g s u m m a r y j u d g m e n t t o T e n n e s s e e P r o t e c t i o n A g e n c y ( “ T

. P

. A

. ” )

. I

, h o w e v e r , d o n o t

c o n c u r w i t h t h e m a

j o r i t y ’ s d e t e r m i n a t i o n t h a t t h e T

. P

. A

. o w e d n o d u t y t o t h e P l a i n t i f f o t h e r

t h a n t o r e f

r a i n f r o m g r o s s n e g l i g e n c e o r w i l l f u l m i s c o n d u c t

.

F o r p u r p o s e s o f i t s m o t i o n f o r s u m m a r y j u d g m e n t b e f o r e t h e T r i a l C o u r t

, T

. P

. A

. a s s u m e d t h a t i t o w e d a d u t y o f c a r e t o P l a i n t i f f

. T h e T r i a l C o u r t g r a n t e d T

. P

. A

. ’ s

m o t i o n f o r s u m m a r y j u d g m e n t u p o n i t s d e t e r m i n a t i o n t h a t T

. P

. A

. h a d s h o w n t h a t i t d i d n o t
b r e a c h a n y d u t y o f c a r e o w e d t o P l a i n t i f f

. H a v i n g s u c c e s s f

u l l y d o n e t h i s , T

. P

. A

. h a d s a t i s f i e d

i t s b u r d e n o f p r o d u c t i o n b y “ a f f i r m a t i v e l y n e g a t e [ i n g ] a n e s s e n t i a l e l e m e n t o f [ P l a i n t i f f ’ s ]

c l a i m

. . . . ” H

a n n a n v

. A l l t e l P u b l ’

g C o

. , 2 7 0 S

. W

. 3 d 1

, 5 ( T e n n

. 2 0 0 8 )

. T h e b u r d e n t h e n

s h i f t e d t o P l a i n t i f

f “ t o s h o w t h a t a g e n u i n e i s s u e o f m a t e r i a l f a c t e x i s t s

. ” I

d

. P l a i n t i f

f f a i l e d

t o m e e t t h i s b u r d e n

.

I a g r e e w i t h t h e T r i a l C o u r t ’ s d e t e r m i n a t i o n t h a t T

. P

. A

. s u c c e s s f u l l y n e g a t e d

a n e s s e n t i a l e l e m e n t o f P l a i n t i f f ’ s c l a i m b y s h o w i n g n o b r e a c h o f a n y d u t y o f c a r e o w e d b y
T

. P

. A

. t o P l a i n t i f

f

, a n d P l a i n t i f

f t h e r e a f t e r f a i l e d t o c r e a t e a g e n u i n e i s s u e o f m a t e r i a l f a c t

. I w o u l d a f

f i r m t h e T r i a l C o u r t ’ s d e c i s i o n o n t h a t b a s i s a n d t h a t b a s i s a l o n e

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. M I C H A E L S W I N E Y

, J U D G E
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case Nos.: 3:01cr83/LAC/EMT

 3:16cv330/LAC/EMT

GARRY A. CARR

_________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Defendant

commenced this action by filing a Motion to Vacate, Correct, or Set Aside His

Conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 363). By order of this court dated July

14, 2016, Defendant was given twenty-eight (28) days in which to file an amended 

§ 2255 motion (ECF No. 366). Defendant failed to file an amended motion; therefore,

on September 1, 2016, the court issued an order requiring Defendant to show cause,

within twenty-one (21) days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to

comply with an order of the court (ECF No. 367). The time for compliance

with the show cause order has now elapsed, and Defendant has failed to file an

amended § 2255 motion.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

Case 3:01-cr-00083-LC-EMT Document 368 Filed 10/03/16 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Defendant’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of October 2016.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

 ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case Nos.: 3:01cr83/LAC/EMT; 3:16cv330/LAC/EMT

Case 3:01-cr-00083-LC-EMT Document 368 Filed 10/03/16 Page 2 of 2
#### DEANNA ELDRETH, by her next friend, O. V. DENTON v. CHARLES RAY ELDRETH, JR.

(Filed 20 November 1963.)

Appeal by defendant from *McConnell, J.,*at Chamber® in Asheboro, North Carolina, 11 April 1963. From RaNdolph.

Civil action for alimony without divorce. On 11 April 1963, after diue notice, a hearing was held for alimony *pendente lite,*counsel fees, and temporary custody and support of the minor child bom of the marriage.

The plaintiff and the defendant were married on 6 November, 1961, and the minor clhild, Michael Rennie Eldreth, was borm on 27 February 1963. The parties separated in November 1962.

At the time of the hearing ■the plaintiff w-a-s living with her parents in the City of Bristol, Virginia, and had custody of the minor child. At the hearing below the defendant moved to continue the hearing until the plaintiff and the minor child were before the court. Motion denied.

The court -heard evidence, found facte, and awarded counsel fee®, temporary alimony .and support for the minor child, and awarded temporary custody of the minor child to the plaintiff until the 27th day of May 1963 or until the further order of the court.

The court further ordered that the defendant pay into the court the sum ;of $30.00 for the use and benefit of the plaintiff in making the trip from Bristol, Virginia, to Asheboro, North Carolina, on 27 May 1963, to attend a further hearing on the matters involved, it appearing that ■plaintiff wais without fundís to make the trip.

From the foregoing order the defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Ottway Burton for plaintiff appellee.*

*548
      *Linwood T. Peoples for defendant appellant.*

PeR Curiam.

The order 'entered below was a temporary one, subject to modification by the judge Resigned to .hold the session of the Superior Court of Randolph County, North Carolina, beginning on 27 May 1963. This further hearing was granted on motion of the defendant in .order that he might cross-examine the plaintiff concerning the reason® for their separation.

No prejudicial error has been shown that would justify setting aside the temporary *order*pending .another hearing.

Affirmed.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 521 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exemption 

to the individual mandate to maintain health coverage for individuals 

residing in counties with fewer than 2 health insurance issuers offering 

plans on an Exchange. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2017 

Mr. AMODEI (for himself, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Mr. PITTENGER, 

Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, and Mr. HUIZENGA) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

an exemption to the individual mandate to maintain 

health coverage for individuals residing in counties with 

fewer than 2 health insurance issuers offering plans on 

an Exchange. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protection from Insur5 ance Exchange Monopolies Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 521 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO EXEMPTION FROM REQUIRE2 MENT TO MAINTAIN HEALTH COVERAGE. 

3 (a) EXEMPTION FOR INDIVIDUALS IN AREAS WITH

4 FEWER THAN 2 ISSUERS OFFERING PLANS ON AN EX5 CHANGE.—Section 5000A(e) of the Internal Revenue Code 

6 of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following 

7 new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(6) INDIVIDUALS IN AREAS WITH FEWER

9 THAN 2 ISSUERS OFFERING PLANS ON AN EX10 CHANGE.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any applicable indi12 vidual for any period during a calendar year if 

13 there are fewer than 2 health insurance issuers 

14 offering qualified health plans on an Exchange 

15 for such period in the county in which the ap16 plicable individual resides. 

17 ‘‘(B) AGGREGATION RULES.—For purposes 

18 of subparagraph (A), all health insurance 

19 issuers treated as a single employer under sub20 section (a) or (b) of section 52, or subsection 

21 (m) or (o) of section 414, shall be treated as a 

22 single health insurance issuer.’’. 

23 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

24 this section shall apply to months beginning after the date 

25 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2009162EN.01001601.xml

| 15.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/16

---

Acknowledgement of receipt of complaint No 2009/4209 — SG(2009)A/1798

2009/C 162/08

| 1. | The European Commission has received and registered under number 2009/4209 — SG/CDC/2009/A/1798 a number of complaints concerning the remuneration of doctors who trained to be specialists in Italy between 1982 and 1991. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The European Commission has received and registered under number 2009/4209 — SG/CDC/2009/A/1798 a number of complaints concerning the remuneration of doctors who trained to be specialists in Italy between 1982 and 1991.

| 2. | Given the significant number of complaints it has received on this subject, the Commission, anxious to respond swiftly and to inform those concerned while making the most economical use of its administrative resources, is publishing this acknowledgment of receipt in the Official Journal of the European Union and on the Internet at:
  http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/complaints/receipt/index_en.htm |
| --- | --- |

2.

Given the significant number of complaints it has received on this subject, the Commission, anxious to respond swiftly and to inform those concerned while making the most economical use of its administrative resources, is publishing this acknowledgment of receipt in the Official Journal of the European Union and on the Internet at:

Official Journal of the European Union

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/complaints/receipt/index_en.htm

| 3. | The complaint is currently being examined by the Commission in the light of Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications, and in particular Article 25(3) of that Directive, which provides that trainee specialised doctors must receive appropriate remuneration. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The complaint is currently being examined by the Commission in the light of Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications, and in particular Article 25(3) of that Directive, which provides that trainee specialised doctors must receive appropriate remuneration.

| 4. | The complainants will be informed, through the same channels, of the results of this examination and of any follow-up action that the Commission may decide to take. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The complainants will be informed, through the same channels, of the results of this examination and of any follow-up action that the Commission may decide to take.

---
#### COMR. OF INSURANCE v. RATE BUREAU

No. 159 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 715.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 April 1980.
# CE2013227EN.01003901.xml

| 6.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 227/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 227/39

---

Thursday 19 January 2012EU accession to Regulation No 29 of the UN Economic Commission for Europe ***

P7_TA(2012)0005

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 January 2012 on the draft Council decision on the accession of the European Union to Regulation No 29 of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the protection of the occupants of the cab of a commercial vehicle (13894/2011 – C7-0303/2011 – 2011/0191(NLE))

(2013/C 227 E/11)

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (13894/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (13894/2011),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with the second indent of Article 4(2) of Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 with a view to accession by the European Community to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (‘Revised 1958 Agreement.’) (1) (C7-0303/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with the second indent of Article 4(2) of Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 with a view to accession by the European Community to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (‘Revised 1958 Agreement.’) (1) (C7-0303/2011),

1

| — | having regard to Rule 81 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 81 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0005/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0005/2012),

| 1. | Consents to the draft Council decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the draft Council decision;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---

(1)  OJ L 346, 17.12.1997, p. 78.

1

---
# C_2010073EN.01001001.xml

| 23.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/10

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5806 — KKR & CO/Pets at Home)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 73/02

On 17 March 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5806. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5806. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
|                                              |                                             |                                                      |   |  |  |  |  |  |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|---|--|--|--|--|--|
| SUBSIDIARY NAME                              | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION AND RESIDENCE | PROPORTION OF OWNERSHIP INTEREST AND VOTING INTEREST |
| Ergo Mining Operations Proprietary Limited   | South Africa                                | 100                                             | % |
| Crown Gold Recoveries Proprietary Limited    | South Africa                                | 100                                             | % |
| East Rand Proprietary Mines Limited          | South Africa                                | 100                                             | % |
| Ergo Mining Proprietary Limited              | South Africa                                | 100                                             | % |
| Far West Gold Recoveries Proprietary Limited | South Africa                                | 100                                             | % |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BRADY GUINAGH,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cv317-SPM/WCS

JAMES DEBEAUGRINE, in his official 

capacity as Director, Florida Agency for

Persons with Disabilities,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME

Upon consideration, the stipulated motion for extension of time to respond

to the complaint and motion for preliminary injunction, and to confer and file a

joint report (doc. 14) is granted. The following new deadlines are established:

Responses to complaint and

motion for preliminary injunction September 28, 2010

Rule 26 conference October 4, 2010

Joint Report October 18, 2010

SO ORDERED this 8th day of September, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge