alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

vs. 3:10cr6/MCR

FRANK R. SKIVINGTON,

 Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11,

Fed.R.Crim.P., and has entered a plea of guilty to the two count indictment against

him. After cautioning and examining the defendant under oath concerning the

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable

and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis

in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guiltybe accepted and that the defendant be adjudicated

guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: March 18, 2010

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within 24 hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 63

### CFR Correction

In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 63 (§§ 63.600 to 63.1199), revised as of July 1, 2006, in § 63.1103, paragraph (e)(2), on page 547, in alphabetical order, add the definition of “Organic HAP” to read as follows:

§ 63.1103

* * * * *

(e)* * *

(2)* * *

*Organic HAP*                         means the compounds listed in Table 1 to subpart XX of this part.                    

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 07-55506 Filed 6-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5244 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5244

  To reaffirm the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe reservation, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2018

   Mr. Keating (for himself, Mr. LaMalfa, Mr. Kennedy, Ms. Clark of 
 Massachusetts, Mr. Capuano, Mr. Lynch, and Mr. Meeks) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reaffirm the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe reservation, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Reservation 
Reaffirmation Act''.

SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF INDIAN TRUST LAND.

    (a) In General.--The taking of land into trust by the United States 
for the benefit of the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe of Massachusetts as 
described in the final Notice of Reservation Proclamation published at 
81 Federal Register 948 (January 8, 2016) is reaffirmed as trust land, 
and the actions of the Secretary of the Interior in taking that land 
into trust are ratified and confirmed.
    (b) Application.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an 
action (including an action pending in a Federal court as of the date 
of enactment of this Act) relating to the land described in subsection 
(a) shall not be filed or maintained in a Federal court and shall be 
promptly dismissed.
    (c) Applicability of Laws.--All laws (including regulations) of the 
United States of general applicability to Indians or nations, Indian 
Tribes, or bands of Indians (including the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 
U.S.C. 5101 et seq.)) shall be applicable to the Tribe and Tribal 
members.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2009185EN.01000501.xml

| 7.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 August 2009

2009/C 185/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4370 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4450 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85240 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2707 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5290 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6635 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,944 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7025 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1450 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2121 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1220 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7067 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5416 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1369 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1435 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0632 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 759,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5850 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,8164 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3359 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 275,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0158 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,626 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,9510 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,833 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6129 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7110 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,4010 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4370

JPY

Japanese yen

137,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4450

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85240

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2707

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5290

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6635

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,944

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7025

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1450

RON

Romanian leu

4,2121

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1220

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7067

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5416

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1369

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1435

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0632

KRW

South Korean won

1 759,06

ZAR

South African rand

11,5850

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,8164

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3359

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 275,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0158

PHP

Philippine peso

68,626

RUB

Russian rouble

44,9510

THB

Thai baht

48,833

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6129

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7110

INR

Indian rupee

68,4010

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Rodger L. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Knology, Inc., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Knology, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 31, 2005    /s/ Rodger L. Johnson   Rodger L. Johnson President and Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE v. BILL STEVE HUTCHINSON.

(Filed 9 October 1963.)

Appeal by defendant from *Campbell, J.,*July 1963 Regular “A” Criminal Session, of Meciclenburg.

This is a criminal action, tried upon a bill of indictment, charging the defendant with the offense of armed robberty. From a verdict of guilty of common law robbery and sentence pronounced thereon, the defendant appeals, assigning error.

*Attorney General Bruton, Deputy Attorney General Harry W. Mc-Galliard for the State..*

*Ray Rankin for the defendant.*

PeR Cueiam.

The appellant assigns as error the refusal of the court below to grant 'his motion for judgment as of nonsuit.

A careful examination of the State’s evidence reveals its sufficiency to support the verdict and judgment entered below.

No prejudicial error that would justify a new trial 'has 'been shown, consequently, the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

Affirmed.
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE Document 19 Filed 03/25/2008 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHRISANNE WALDBRUNN,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv273/MCR/CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated August 18, 2011. The plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the

report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo

determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The application for a period of disability and disability benefits is DENIED and

Case 3:10-cv-00273-MCR-CJK Document 17 Filed 09/23/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

the Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of September, 2011. 

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case No. 3:10cv273/MCR/CJK

Case 3:10-cv-00273-MCR-CJK Document 17 Filed 09/23/11 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  FREIGHT  MANAGEMENT  CORP.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,  2009,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ibrahim
Abotaleb, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                  /s/ Ibrahim Abotaleb
                                  ----------------------------------------------
Date: July 23, 2009               Ibrahim Abotaleb
                                  President, CEO and Principal Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Enox Biopharma, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Prof. Yossef
Av-Gay, principal executive officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: April 29, 2009                        By: /s/ Prof. Yossef Av-Gay
                                               ---------------------------------
                                            Name:  Prof. Yossef Av-Gay
                                            Title: President
                                                   Principal Executive Officer)
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOE RENA DELGADO,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-00238-RH-GRJ

JOHN DOE, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Place Case in Abeyance (Doc.

12), which the Court construes as a request for additional time through March 7, 2011

to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was directed in the Court’s Order dated

December 9, 2010 to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff requested an

extension of time to comply with this Order through February 7, 2011. (Doc. 11.) 

Plaintiff will be released from incarceration on February 16, 2011, and contends that he

will seek the assistance of counsel upon his release. Id. This is sufficient good cause

to grant an additional thirty days to file an amended complaint.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

That Plaintiff’s Motion to Place Case in Abeyance (Doc. 12), construed as a

motion for additional time to file an amended complaint, is GRANTED. Plaintiff
Page 2 of 2

shall file the amended complaint on or before March 7, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10 day of February, 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 5:10-cv-00238-RH -GRJ
#### STATE v. TRUZY

No. 160 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 53.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 March 1980.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of AEI Income & Growth Fund
XXII Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ ROBERT P JOHNSON
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 29, 2010


                          /s/ PATRICK W KEENE
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 29, 2010
# CE2013261EN.01005302.xml

| 10.9.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 261/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 261/53

---

Thursday 10 May 2012Electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union ***

P7_TA(2012)0150

European Parliament legislative resolution of 10 May 2012 on the draft Council regulation on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (10222/5/2011 – C7-0076/2012 – 2011/0070(APP))

2013/C 261 E/13

(Special legislative procedure – consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council regulation (10222/5/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council regulation (10222/5/2011),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0076/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0076/2012),

| — | having regard to Rule 81(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 81(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A7-0087/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A7-0087/2012),

| 1. | Consents to the draft Council regulation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the draft Council regulation;

| 2. | Reminds the Council that, should the requirement for unanimity under Article 352 TFEU and the pending domestic parliamentary procedures in the United Kingdom lead to any change in the draft text, the consent of the European Parliament will have to be requested anew; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Reminds the Council that, should the requirement for unanimity under Article 352 TFEU and the pending domestic parliamentary procedures in the United Kingdom lead to any change in the draft text, the consent of the European Parliament will have to be requested anew;

| 3. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

---
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 6 Filed 02/13/01 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 6 Filed 02/13/01 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:00-cv-00566-LC Document 6 Filed 02/13/01 Page 3 of 3