alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ARCADIA DAIRY FARMS, INC., a North Carolina Corporation v. NORTH CAROLINA MILK COMMISSION, WILLIAM YOUNTS, JR., HERBERT C. HAWTHORNE, MRS. B. C. LANGSTON, SR., FRANKLIN POISSON, B. F. NESBITT, MRS. LILLIAN WOO, and MARTIN PANNELL

No. 18

(Filed 6 April 1976)

Appeal by plaintiff from *McKinnon,*Jat the 16 June 1975 Session of Wake, heard prior to determination by the Court of Appeals.

This is a companion to Case No. 17, In Re Appeal of and Petition for Judicial Review by Arcadia Dairy Farms, Inc., of Amendment No. 27 to Milk Marketing Order #2. The two cases were argued together on appeal and present essentially the same questions.

In the present case, Arcadia sued in the Superior Court of Wake County for a declaratory judgment that Milk Marketing Order #2, as amended by Amendment No. 27, be declared illegal, unconstitutional and void insofar as it purports to require payments by the plaintiff to an equalization fund established by the order of the Milk Commission. In Case No. 17, Arcadia sought similar judicial review of the action of the Commission pursuant to G.S. 106-266.15 (b). The plaintiff, in the present *473suit, also sought a permanent injunction against the defendants to restrain the enforcement of the provisions of the Commission’s order with reference to the requirement of such payments into the equalization fund.

After hearing, the trial judge made findings of fact and conclusions of law, including the conclusion that the plaintiff is not entitled to the declaratory judgment for which it prays.

*Robert B. Long, Jr., for appellant.*

*Harris, Poe, Cheshire éc Leager by W. C. Harris, Jr., for appellee.*

LAKE, Justice.

The trial court concluded: “The Commission does have the statutory power to adopt the regulation known as Amendment No. 27 to Milk Marketing Order No. 2 requiring certain equalization payments under the circumstances prescribed in the order by licensed distributors of the Commission.” For the reasons set forth in our opinion in Case No. 17, decided this day, the foregoing conclusion of the trial court is erroneous. The judgment of the Superior Court is, therefore, reversed and this matter is remanded to that court for the entry of a judgment granting to the plaintiff the relief prayed for in its complaint.

Reversed and remanded.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-50959

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

EZEQUIEL MENDOZA-ESPINOZA, also known as Cipriano Rodriguez-Garcia,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:12-CR-1063-1

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Ezequiel Mendoza-Espinoza pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the

United States after having been removed in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and he

was sentenced within the Sentencing Guidelines to 57 months of imprisonment. 

He argues that his within-guidelines sentence is substantively unreasonable

because it is greater than necessary to meet the sentencing goals of 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a). 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 15, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-50959 Document: 00512406844 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/15/2013
No. 12-50959

We consider the reasonableness of a sentence by engaging in a bifurcated

review process. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). Because MendozaEspinoza does not argue that the district court committed any procedural error,

we consider only the “substantive reasonableness of the sentence imposed under

an abuse-of-discretion standard.” Id. 

Although Mendoza-Espinoza asserts that a presumptionof reasonableness

should not apply to his within-guidelines sentence because U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2

lacks an empirical basis, that issue is foreclosed. See United States v. Duarte,

569 F.3d 528, 530-31 (5th Cir. 2009); United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564

F.3d 357, 366-67 (5th Cir. 2009). His argument that § 2L1.2 is unreasonable

because it is not empirically based likewise is foreclosed, and we have repeatedly

rejected the argument that a sentence imposed pursuant to § 2L1.2 is greater

than necessary to meet § 3553(a)’s goals as a result of any double counting

inherent in that Guideline. See Duarte, 569 F.3d at 529-31. 

As for his argument that the guidelines range overstated the seriousness

of his illegal reentry offense and failed to reflect his personal history and

characteristics, the record reflects that the district court considered mitigation

factors and balanced them against other § 3553(a) factors. Mendoza-Espinoza

has failed to show that his within-guidelines sentence “does not account for a

factor that should receive significant weight, . . . gives significant weight to an

irrelevant or improper factor, or . . . represents a clear error of judgment in

balancing sentencing factors.” United States v. Cooks, 589 F.3d 173, 186 (5th

Cir. 2009). We find no reason to disturb the presumption of reasonableness in

this case. See id.; United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 12-50959 Document: 00512406844 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/15/2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

 Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 20th meeting of the American Health Information Community Electronic Health Records Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

December 4, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern].

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthrecords/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue its discussion on ways to achieve widespread adoption of certified EHRs, minimizing gaps in adoption among providers.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov.healthit/​ahic/​healthrecords/​ehr_​instruct.html.*

Dated: November 2, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-5642 Filed 11-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas M. Polinsky, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph A. Geraci, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | 1. | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and                                        
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



| | /s/ Douglas M. Polinsky 
| | ------------------------
| | Douglas M. Polinsky     
| | Chief Executive Officer 
| |                         
| | July 31, 2020           
| |                         
| | /s/ Joseph A. Geraci, II
| | Joseph A. Geraci, II    
| | Chief Financial Officer 
| |                         
| | July 31, 2020
# C_2010121EN.01000201.xml

| 8.5.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 May 2010

2010/C 121/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2746 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4435 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86805 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7633 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4144 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,9540 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,976 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 281,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7072 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1483 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1880 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9923 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4345 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3229 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9160 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7867 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7777 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 472,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8233 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7000 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2660 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 757,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1737 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,063 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,8980 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,211 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3477 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4689 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 57,9690 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2746

JPY

Japanese yen

117,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4435

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86805

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7633

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4144

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,9540

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,976

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

281,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7072

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1483

RON

Romanian leu

4,1880

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9923

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4345

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3229

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9160

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7867

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7777

KRW

South Korean won

1 472,54

ZAR

South African rand

9,8233

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7000

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2660

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 757,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1737

PHP

Philippine peso

58,063

RUB

Russian rouble

38,8980

THB

Thai baht

41,211

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3477

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4689

INR

Indian rupee

57,9690

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 5 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 6 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 7 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 8 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 9 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 10 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 11 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 12 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 13 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 14 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 15 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 16 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 17 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 18 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 19 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 20 of 21
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-3 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 21 of 21
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-221/RS-EMT 

MARION KING, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________________ 

UORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 14). This case is dismissed 

without prejudice. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on October 20, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






The Board of Directors


Oilsands Quest Inc.




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-1 (no. 333-162023) and on Form S-8 (nos. 333-145079 and 333-135366) of Oilsands Quest Inc. of our reports dated July 12, 2010 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company (a development stage company) as of April 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2010 and the information included in the cumulative from inception presentations for the period from May 1, 2007 to April 30, 2010 (not separately presented), and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2010, which reports appear in the April 30, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.




/s/ KPMG LLP




Calgary, Canada


July 12, 2010






EX-1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ROBERT GIBSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-37-SPM/MD

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 7). Plaintiff has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed an objection (doc. 9). Pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have conducted a de novo review of the sections of

the report to which objections have been made. I find that the Report and

Recommendation is correct and should be adopted.

A review of the record reveals that Plaintiff has an evident pattern of filing

frivolous lawsuits, as well as a history of dishonesty with the Courts regarding the

number of cases he has previously filed. The Court finds that, given the number

of prior cases that the Plaintiff failed to disclose in the complaint form, the
Plaintiff’s lack of candor was not merely the result of an oversight. Accordingly, it

is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 7) is

adopted and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice as an abuse

of the judicial process. The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket

that this cause was dismissed as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(i).

DONE AND ORDERED this eighteenth day of March, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

2
# EUR-Lex - - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

#

**Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the EU and Liberia on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products to the European Union *** European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 April 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Liberia on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products to the European Union (11104/2011 – C7-0241/2011 – 2011/0160(NLE)) **

*
Official Journal C 258 E , 07/09/2013 P. 0130 - 0131 *

Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the EU and Liberia on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products to the European Union ***

P7_TA(2012)0132

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 April 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Liberia on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products to the European Union (11104/2011 – C7-0241/2011 – 2011/0160(NLE))

2013/C 258 E/22

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the draft Council decision (11104/2011),

- having regard to the draft Voluntary Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Liberia on forest law enforcement, governance and trade in timber products to the European Union (11101/2011),

- having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(3) and (4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0241/2011),

- having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade and the opinion of the Committee on Development (A7-0081/2012),

1. Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;

2. Calls on the Commission to regularly report to Parliament on progress in the implementation of existing Voluntary Partnership Agreements (VPAs) and in negotiating and implementing new VPAs;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Liberia.

--------------------------------------------------
#### STATE v. THOMAS

No. 195 PC.

Case below: 15 N.C. App. 289.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 August 1972.
EXHIBIT
31.1


CERTIFICATIONS





I, Robert
DeKett, certify that:





1.    I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NanoTech Entertainment,
Inc.




2.    Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.    Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.    I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have;




(a)
 Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)
 Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;




(c)
 Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
 Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.    I
have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




(a)
 All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b)
 Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting.




Date:  May
      24, 2010
              /s/ Robert DeKettRobert
      DeKettChief
      Executive Officer
CANALASKA VENTURES LTD.



Request for Financial Statements



In accordance with National Instrument 54-101 of the Canadian Securities Administrators, registered and beneficial shareholders of the subject Company may elect annually to receive interim corporate mailings, including interim financial statements of the Company, if they so request.  If you wish to receive such mailings, please complete and return this form to:



CanAlaska Ventures Ltd.

2303 West 41st Avenue

Vancouver, BC  V6M 2A3

Facsimile:  604-685-6550





NAME:

_____________________________________________________________



ADDRESS:

_____________________________________________________________



_____________________________________________________________



POSTAL CODE:





TELEPHONE:





FACSIMILE:





EMAIL:







I the undersigned wish to receive the following:





INTERIM MAILINGS





ANNUAL MAILINGS







I confirm that I am an owner of common shares of the Company.





SIGNATURE OF

SHAREHOLDER:

___________________________________DATE:_______________



CUSIP:    137089108