alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010006EN.01000101.xml

| 12.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 January 2010

2010/C 6/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4528 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4411 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89890 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1995 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4755 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1395 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,192 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0583 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1281 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1100 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5593 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4928 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,2666 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9594 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0163 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 626,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,6386 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9174 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2775 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 296,15 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8473 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,219 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,6285 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,008 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5041 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3538 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,8600 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4528

JPY

Japanese yen

134,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4411

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89890

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1995

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4755

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1395

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,192

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0583

RON

Romanian leu

4,1281

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1100

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5593

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4928

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,2666

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9594

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0163

KRW

South Korean won

1 626,94

ZAR

South African rand

10,6386

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9174

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2775

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 296,15

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8473

PHP

Philippine peso

66,219

RUB

Russian rouble

42,6285

THB

Thai baht

48,008

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5041

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3538

INR

Indian rupee

65,8600

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KELLY WHISBY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-00174-SPM-AK

JOHN DOE, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Plaintiff, an inmate of the Florida penal system proceeding pro se, has filed a civil

rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (doc 1), and a motion for leave to proceed

in forma pauperis. (Doc. 6). Upon review of the complaint and court records from this

Court and the Middle District of Florida, the Court finds that this complaint is subject to

summary dismissal.

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), which was enacted on April

26, 1996, provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action in forma pauperis under 28

U.S.C. § 1915:

if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained

in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States

that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to

state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is
Page 2 of 3

under imminent danger of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Plaintiff has had three or more prior prisoner actions dismissed in the Middle

District of Florida on the grounds that they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a

claim: Case No. 3:09cv1178, dismissed on December 8, 2009, as frivolous; Case No.

3:09cv1257, dismissed on December 28, 2009, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1015(e)(2)(B),

generally; Case No. 3:10cv151, dismissed on February 23, 2010, as frivolous; and Case

No. 3:10cv152, dismissed on February 26, 2010, as frivolous. Pending in this district is

Case No. 5:10cv173-RS/MD, wherein it has been recommended that the case be

dismissed because Plaintiff has three strikes and he failed to allege that he was in

imminent danger of serious physical injury. 

The instant complaint alleges that Defendants, John Doe Correctional Officers at

FCI, Marianna, Florida, prevented Plaintiff from being transferred from February 2006

to August 2006. Plaintiff is now in custody at the Duval County Jail in Jacksonville,

Florida. Under these set of facts, it cannot be said that he is under any imminent or

serious danger, and therefore, his allegations do not bring him within the "imminent

danger" exception. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis , (doc. 6) is DENIED.

Case No: 5:10-cv-00174-SPM-AK
Page 3 of 3

2. That this cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file

another complaint making the same allegations for which he pays the full $350.00 filing

fee at the time of filing the complaint.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of August, 2010. 

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

Case No: 5:10-cv-00174-SPM-AK
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Amended Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-Q of Vycor Medical, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2010, I
                  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)
                           
                           
                           the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
                              30, 2010 of Vycor Medical, Inc. fully complies with the requirements
                              of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
                           
                           
                           the information contained in the Amended Quarterly Report on Form
                              10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, fairly presents in all
                              material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                              of Vycor Medical, Inc.   By:
                           
                           
                           /s/ Adrian LiddellName:
                           
                           
                           Adrian LiddellTitle:
                           
                           
                           Principal Financial and Accounting OfficerDate:
                           
                           
                           September 2, 2011
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trevenex Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Scott Wetzel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                         |                                   
|------------------------ | ----------------------------------
|Dated:  October 26, 2009 | By: /s/ Scott Wetzel              
|                         | Scott Wetzel                      
|                         | President, Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CRAIG K. STATEN,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:10cv108-WS

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, 

et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

January 4, 2011. See Doc. 21. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's

complaint and this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with an

order of the court. The plaintiff has filed objections (doc. 22) to the report and

recommendation. 

Having considered the record in light of the plaintiff's objections, the court finds

that the case must be dismissed as recommended by the magistrate judge.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 21) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.
Page 2 of 2

2. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE for failure to comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of February , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 99.2



                        Written Statement of Sheri Halfon
                          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the
undersigned Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Avenue
Entertainment Group, Inc. (the "Company"). Hereby certify, based on my
knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

----------------------------------------
Sheri Halfon
March 26, 2003
#### Elizabeth Guntrum, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frederick J. Guntrum, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Appellant.

(Submitted May 27, 1918;

decided June 4, 1918.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. (See 223 N. Y. 625;)
445 S.E.2d 168

#### B.F. GILMORE, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. WEST VIRGINIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and Henry R. Marock-ie, State Superintendent of Schools, Defendants Below, Appellees.

No. 21379.

Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

Submitted Jan. 25, 1994.

Decided Feb. 18, 1994.

*228John Everett Roush, Charleston, for appellant.

John S. Dalporto, Asst. Atty. Gen.-, Charleston, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:

The matters in this appeal, which was accepted on November 9, 1992, but was not argued until January 25,1994, involve a claim of age discrimination by B.F. Gilmore, a school bus driver employed by the Wood County Board of Education. The claimed discriminatory rule as adopted by the West Virginia State Department of Education states that a candidate for a school bus driver shall not be certified or recertified after his or her seventieth birthday. After pursuing his administrative remedies, Mr. Gilmore appealed the matter to the circuit court. By an order dated January 31, 1992, the circuit court denied Mr. Gilmore any relief.

A similar challenge of age discrimination was made by another school bus driver, Lavern L. Rank, before the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. § 621, *et seq.*This action culminated in an agreed Conciliation Agreement with the State Department of Education dated June 14, 1993. By its terms, the agreement applies to any school bus driver previously decertified in 1992 and 1993. The Department of Education, during the course of oral argument, admitted the applicability of the Conciliation Agreement to this case. Consequently, we apply the rule stated in Syllabus Point 1 of *West Virginia Board of Dental Examiners v. Storch,*146 W.Va. 662, 122 S.E.2d 295 (1961):

> “The general rule, subject to certain exceptions, is that appeals will be dismissed where there is no actual controversy existing between the parties at the time of the hearing.”

*See also Orwasky v. Chuma,*148 W.Va. 349, 135 S.E.2d 248 (1964).

For the foregoing reason, we conclude that the matters before this Court are no longer in controversy and this appeal is dismissed. Appeal dismissed.
#### IFCO v. BANK

No. 26 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 499.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1979.
#### INSURANCE CO. v. INGRAM, COMR. OF INSURANCE

No. 4 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 621.

Petition by Wake Anesthesiology Assoc, and its employees for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 April 1980. Motion of plaintiffs to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 April 1980.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:10cr37-SPM

ARTHUR BRENT STANLEY

 a/k/a “Stanley Yates,”

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT TWO

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to dismiss

Count Two on double jeopardy grounds. Doc. 32. For the following reasons, the

motion will be denied.

Defendant pleaded guilty to both distribution (Count One) and possession

(Count Two) of child pornography. To be successful on his double jeopardy

challenge he must show that the offenses of distribution and possession are not

factually distinct given the record that existed at the time of his plea. United

States v. Harper, No. 09-16077, 2010 WL 3860730 (Oct. 5, 2010). Two factually

distinct offenses are possible from the record, however. 

Both the indictment and the statement of facts supporting Defendant’s

guilty plea refer to more than one image of child pornography, and Defendant’s

possession and distribution occurred on more than one date. Specifically,
Page 2 of 2

multiple images of child pornography were downloaded from a selection available

on Defendant’s computer by using a file sharing program on February 17, 2010,

so as to support the distribution charge in Count Two. Additional images were

found on Defendant’s computer when it was seized on June 30, 2010, so as to

support the possession charged in Count Two. Because the record shows that

each count can be established based on conduct that occurred on different dates

and involved different images, each count can be construed as a separate

offense and Defendant has no viable double jeopardy argument. Id.; United

States v. Bobb, 577 F.3d 1366, 1375 (11th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Defendant’s motion to dismiss Count Two

(doc. 32) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of December, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO. 1:10cr37-SPM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

APRIL PRESTON,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-210/RS-EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of the 

Social Security Administration,

Defendant. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Order, Report and Recommendation (Doc. 

24). Plaintiff has not filed objections. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and is 

incorporated in this Order. 

2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

3. This case is DISMISSED. 

4. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

ORDERED on October 14, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00210-RS-EMT Document 25 Filed 10/14/11 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING ANDFINANCIAL OFFICER Pursuant TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Grant Hartford Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, David Gilmer, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
Dated: August 22, 2011

/s/David Gilmer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Enox Biopharma, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Razi
Mizrahi, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: December 11, 2008                     By: /s/ Razi Mizrahi
                                               ---------------------------------
                                            Name:  Razi Mizrahi
                                            Title: Secretary and Treasurer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2009283EN.01000602.xml

| 24.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5645 — CPI CEE/Gazit Midas/Atrium European Real Estate)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 283/04

On 18 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5645. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5645. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
April 21, 2016

	In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 21st day of April, 2016.

10-16-00115-CR	LAWRENCE WOODS v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - ON APPEAL FROM THE 54TH DISTRICT COURT OF McLENNAN COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO.  W-15-CR-032 - DISMISSED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Scoggins:

“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion that this Court lacks jurisdiction and that the appeal should be dismissed; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  It is further ordered that costs of appeal be, and hereby are, adjudged against Appellant and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DUANE JARRELL,

 Plaintiff,

vs. 1:10cv137/MP/GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security, 

 Defendant.

____________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated August 30, 2011. All parties have been furnished copies of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo determination of those portions

to which an objection has been made. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted in its entirety

by this court.

2. The decision of the Commissioner denying disability benefits is AFFIRMED.

3. Judgment shall be entered accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of October, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:10-cv-00137-MP-GRJ Document 23 Filed 10/28/11 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.1

KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA

|                        |               
|----------------------- | --------------
|To Whom It May Concern: | March 11, 2002

The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC consents to the inclusion of his report of
March 11, 2002 accompanying the audited financial statements of Dazzling
Investments, Inc., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related statements
of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and
the period December 6, 1996 (inception) through December 31, 2001, in the Form
10KSB with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Kyle L. Tingle

Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC

P.O. Box 50141, Henderson, Nevada 89016, Phone: (702) 434-8452,
Fax: (702) 436-4218, e-mail: Ktingle@worldnet.att.net