alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
      (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;(b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Karim HirjiKarim Hirji, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certifications

I, David Weisman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eagle Broadband, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     a.   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     b.   Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
          such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
          our supervision, to provided reasonable assurance regarding the
          reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
          statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
          accounting principles; and

     c.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions abut the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

     a.   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and

     b.   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date July 29, 2004

/s/ David A. Weisman
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Averox Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ended June 30 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 13, 2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

October 13, 2009
                                            /s/ Salman Mahmood
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Salman Mahmood
                                            President
                                            Principal Executive Officer
# CA2009097EN.01S00301.xml

| 28.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 97/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 97/s3

---

REVIEW OF ‘COMPETITION’ C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 9 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | (IT) |
| 12 | (DE/FR) |
| 13 | |
| 14 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 16 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 17 | (BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO) |
| 20 | |
| 21 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 23 | |
| 24 | (DE/FR/NL) |
| 25 | (BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO) |
| 28 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 34 | (FR) |
| 36 | (GA/EN) |
| 37 | |
| 38 | |
| 39 | (SV) |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | (EN) |
| 45 | |
| 46 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 47 | |
| 52 | (DA/FI/MT) |
| 58 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 59 | (DE/EN/ES/FR/PT/SV) |
| 62 | (BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK) |
| 63 | |
| 70 | |
| 71 | |
| 75 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 80 | (FR) |
| 84 | (BG/RO) |
| 86 | |
| 91 | |
| 93 | (BG/RO) |
| 94 | |
| 95 | |
| 97 | (DE/EN/FR) |

9

(DE/EN/FR)

10

(IT)

12

(DE/FR)

13

14

(DE/EN/FR)

16

(DE/EN/FR)

17

(BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO)

20

21

(DE/EN/FR)

23

24

(DE/FR/NL)

25

(BG/ET/LT/LV/MT/RO)

28

(DE/EN/FR)

34

(FR)

36

(GA/EN)

37

38

39

(SV)

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

(EN)

45

46

(DE/EN/FR)

47

52

(DA/FI/MT)

58

(DE/EN/FR)

59

(DE/EN/ES/FR/PT/SV)

62

(BG/CS/LT/LV/MT/PL/RO/SK)

63

70

71

75

(DE/EN/FR)

80

(FR)

84

(BG/RO)

86

91

93

(BG/RO)

94

95

97

(DE/EN/FR)

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-50524 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus WILLIAM A. LUSK, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CA-586-JN - - - - - - - - - - February 26, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * William A. Lusk appeals the dismissal of his post-conviction motion. Lusk contends that the Government failed to produce exculpatory evidence and witness statements to him in violation of the rule in Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83, 86 (1963), and the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500(b). Lusk also contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. A careful review of the record and the arguments of the parties reveals that Lusk has shown no reversible error in the district court’s judgment. AFFIRMED.
#### CAROLINA-ATLANTIC DISTRIBUTORS v. TEACHEY’S INSULATION

No. 182 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 705.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 August 1981.
#### STATE v. BALDWIN

No. 2 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 257.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 March 1972.
# C_2010061EN.01000301.xml

| 12.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 61/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 61/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 March 2010

2010/C 61/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3657 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,84 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4409 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90860 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,7285 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4622 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0115 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,555 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 266,92 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7080 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9012 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,0953 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0950 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4916 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4027 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5974 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9491 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9095 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 547,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,1505 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,3231 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2580 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 542,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5321 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,434 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 40,2450 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,652 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,4144 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1955 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,2960 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3657

JPY

Japanese yen

123,84

DKK

Danish krone

7,4409

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90860

SEK

Swedish krona

9,7285

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4622

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0115

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,555

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

266,92

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7080

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9012

RON

Romanian leu

4,0953

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0950

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4916

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4027

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5974

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9491

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9095

KRW

South Korean won

1 547,83

ZAR

South African rand

10,1505

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,3231

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2580

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 542,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5321

PHP

Philippine peso

62,434

RUB

Russian rouble

40,2450

THB

Thai baht

44,652

BRL

Brazilian real

2,4144

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1955

INR

Indian rupee

62,2960

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### LUCILLE MYERS CAPPS v. REUBEN B. STRATTON.

(Filed 27 November 1963.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Crissman, J.,*18 February 1963 Civil Session of GuilfoRD — High Point Division.

Civil action to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the actionable negligence of defendant.

Defendant in his answer denied negligence and conditionally pleaded contributory negligence of plaintiff as a bar to recovery.

This action grew out of a collision between an automobile driven by plaintiff and an automobile driven by defendant about 12:25 p.m. on 9 January 1961 at the intersection .of West Washington and College Streets in the city of High Point.

The jury found by their verdict that plaintiff was injured by defendant’s negligence as alleged in the complaint, and that plaintiff by her oiwn negligence contributed to- her injuries as alleged in the answer.

From judgment entered on tire verdict, plaintiff appeals.

*Martin, Whitley and Washington hy Edward K. Washington for plaintiff appellant.*

*Morgan, Byerly, Post, Van Anda Ac, Keziah by W. B. Byerly, Jr., for defendant appellee.*

PER Cueiam.

The pages of our Reports are filled with cases for damages growing out of automobile collisions at street intersections, wherein the applicable law has been stated and repeated again and again. A careful examination of the assignments of error discloses no new question or feature requiring extended discussion. Prejudicial error has not been made to appear. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.
Case 1:07-cv-03546-VM Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03546-VM Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03546-VM Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03546-VM Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03546-VM Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03546-VM Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03546-VM Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03546-VM Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03546-VM Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 9 of 9
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DOUGLAS HAROLD LOWERY, II,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:10cv204-WS

ARMOR MEDICAL, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

November 19, 2010. See Doc. 5. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's

complaint and this case be dismissed as malicious based on the plaintiff's failure to

disclose—at the time he filed his complaint—a previously-filed civil action relating to the

fact or manner of his incarceration. The plaintiff filed no objections to the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation. 

By order docketed December 16, 2010, the court gave the plaintiff until January

7, 2011, to explain "why he failed to disclose Case No. 3:09cv514-RV on his complaint."

The plaintiff was warned that, if he failed to respond to the court's order directing an

explanation, his case would be dismissed as recommended by the magistrate judge. 

On December 23, 2010, the plaintiff filed a document entitled "Re:Order to Show

Cause." In that document, the plaintiff stated that he wished to proceed with his case,

but he gave no explanation for his failure to properly disclose his litigation history. 
Page 2 of 2

Absent such an explanation, the court has determined that the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 5) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated in this order by reference.

2. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for the plaintiff's

abuse of the judicial process.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall note on the docket sheet

that the case was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of January , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5650]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, November 15, 2007.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Request from Shell New Orleans Federal Credit Union to Convert 
to a Community Charter.
    2. NCUA's 2008 Annual Performance Budget.
    3. NCUA's 2008/2009 Operating Budget.
    4. NUCA's Overhead Transfer Rate.
    5. NCUA's Operating Fee Scale.
    6. Final Rule: Section 701.23 of NCUA's Rules and Regulations, 
Eligible Obligations.

Recess: 11 a.m.

Time and Date: 11:15 a.m., Thursday, November 15, 2007.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. One (1) Administrative Action under Sections 205, 207, and 208 
of the Federal Credit Union Act. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (8), 
(9)(A)(ii), and (9)(B).
    2. One (1) Administrative Action under Sections 206 and 208 of the 
Federal Credit Union Act. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (8), 
(9)(A)(ii), and (9)(B).
    3. One (1) Personnel Matter. Closed pursuant to Exemptions (2).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 07-5650 Filed 11-8-07; 3:11 pm]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-M
#### GRANT v. INSURANCE CO.

Case below: 1 N.C. App. 76.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 April 1968.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KELLY WHISBY,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv173/RS-MD

JOHN DOE, Lieutenant of

Marianna Federal Prison, et al,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Order and Report and Recommendation

(Doc. 5) and Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider The Court’s Order Denying Permission To

Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 6) which will be considered as objections. I have

considered Plaintiff’s objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Order and Report and Recommendation is

adopted and incorporated in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice to its re-filing when accompanied

by the payment of the full $350.00 fling fee.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on August 24, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Caribbean Villa Catering Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange


Commission (the "Report"), I, Robert Seeley, President (principal executive officer) and Virgilio Santana Ripoll, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;


and





2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








November 23, 2009





/s/ Robert Seeley


Robert Seeley, President,


principal executive officer,








/s/ Virgilio Santana Ripoll


Virgilio Santana Ripoll, Chief Financial Officer


principal financial and


accounting officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2009058EN.01000501.xml

| 12.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 March 2009

(2009/C 58/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2786 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4498 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,92550 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,2475 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4772 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8320 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,963 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 300,26 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7074 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5905 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2815 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2140 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9657 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6325 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9165 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,5266 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9600 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 889,77 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0033 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7461 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4210 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 375,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7263 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,760 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,7644 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,994 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9740 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,4155 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,4130 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2786

JPY

Japanese yen

125,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4498

GBP

Pound sterling

0,92550

SEK

Swedish krona

11,2475

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4772

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8320

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,963

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

300,26

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7074

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5905

RON

Romanian leu

4,2815

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2140

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9657

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6325

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9165

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,5266

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9600

KRW

South Korean won

1 889,77

ZAR

South African rand

13,0033

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7461

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4210

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 375,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7263

PHP

Philippine peso

61,760

RUB

Russian rouble

44,7644

THB

Thai baht

45,994

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9740

MXN

Mexican peso

19,4155

INR

Indian rupee

65,4130

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
#### STATE v. WADE

No. 125 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 414.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 July 1972.
Exhibit 10.2





February 14, 2016




Partner Communications Company Ltd.


8 Amal Street


Afeq Industrial Park


Rosh-Ha’ayin  48103


Israel




Dear Sirs:





On behalf of Giza Singer Even, 7 Jabotinsky St. Ramat-Gan(the “Consultant”), I hereby confirm that the Consultant has reviewed the information set forth in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Form 20-F”), for Partner Communications Company Ltd. under Item 5A.1f “Acquisition of 012 Smile”, Item 5A.1r “Critical Accounting Estimates and Judgments”, and in Note 4 and Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Form 20-F, with respect to testing for impairment of assets and the results thereof.





The Consultant hereby confirms the information referred to above and consents to being named in the Form 20-F as an “expert”.




By:____/s/_______




Giza Singer Even LTD.





Name: Nir Harush


Title: Partner