alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION  I, Ted R. Sharp, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  May 14, 2007  By:   /s/  Ted R. Sharp Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 225 (Friday, November 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 65734]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5830]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES


Sunshine Act Meetings

ACTION: Notice of a Partially Open Meeting of the Board of Directors of 
the Export-Import Bank of the United States.

TIME AND PLACE: Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. The meeting 
will be held at Ex-Im Bank in Room 1143, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., 
Washington, DC 20571.

OPEN AGENDA ITEMS: Item No. 1: Ex-Im Bank Sub-Saharan Africa Advisory 
Committee for 2008 & Item No. 2: Ex-Im Bank Advisory Committee for 
2008.

PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: The meeting will be open to public participation 
for Items No. 1 and No. 2 only.

FURTHER INFORMATION: For further information, contact: Office of the 
Secretary, 811 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20571 (Tele. No. 
202-565-3957).

Howard A. Schweitzer,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 07-5830 Filed 11-20-07; 1:46 pm]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-M
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 13 - 00360 - CR JORGE CAVAZOS, APPEL LANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the 85th District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 11 - 00914 - CRF - 85, Honorable J. D. Langley, Presiding 

### December 13 , 2013 ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant Jorge Cavazos appeals from his conviction for delivery of a controlled substance. The clerk’s and reporter’s records were due to be filed on October 14, 2013. On November 1, 2013, we notified the court reporter that the reporter’s record was past due and to advise us of the status of the record no later than November 12, 2013. On November 18 th , the court reporter notified this court that there had been no designation of the reporter’s record delivered to her and that she would not be requesting an extension. The district clerk, on O ctober 11, 2013, requested an extension of time to file2

the record because no designation of the record had been filed. It was granted to November 13, 2013. To date no record has been filed. On November 20, 2013, we directed counsel for appellant to ce rtify to this court whether or not he had complied with the appellate rules concerning designation of the clerk’s and reporter’s records. Counsel replied that he had not requested the records because he has not been able to “obtain the money needed to pay for them.” Furthermore, counsel represented that he was in the “process of filing the necessary paperwork to obtain a Free Reporter’s Record.” Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 85 th District Court (trial court) for further pr oceedings. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine the following: 1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; 2. whether appellant is indigent; and, if so, 3. whether appellant is entitled to a free record. The trial court is al so directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental record and cause that record to be filed with this court by January 6, 2014. Should further time b e needed to perform these tasks, then same must be requested before January 6, 2014. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
#### ROBERTS v. WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY

No. 47P82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 430.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 May 1982.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:09cr50-SPM/AK

STEVEN EUGENE PASSMORE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER RESETTING TRIAL AND SETTING HEARING

To facilitate the prompt administration of justice, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Trial is reset for 8:30 a.m. on Monday, November 23, 2009, at the

United States Courthouse in Gainesville, Florida.

2. A hearing is set for 1:30 p.m. on Monday, November 16, 2009, at

the United States Courthouse in Tallahassee, Florida. The purpose is to discuss

Defendant’s expressed preference for a non-jury trial and establish a waiver and

approval, as required under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23(a). The

Court will also discuss with Defendant his decision to proceed as his own lawyer. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of November, 2009.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
# C_2009230EN.01001001.xml

| 24.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/10

---

PUBLIC HOLIDAYS SCHEDULE 2011 FOR EUROPEAN COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONS

PUBLIC HOLIDAYS SCHEDULE 2011 FOR EUROPEAN COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONS

2009/C 230/04

The public holidays in 2011 for the staff of the European Community Institutions in Brussels and Luxembourg shall be as follows:

| 21 April | Maundy Thursday |
| --- | --- |
| 22 April | Good Friday |
| 25 April | Easter Monday |
| 9 May | Monday, anniversary of the declaration made by President Robert Schuman in 1950 |
| 2 June | Thursday, Ascension Day |
| 3 June | Friday, the day following Ascension Day |
| 13 June | Whit Monday |
| 21 July | Thursday, Belgian national holiday |
| 15 August | Monday, Assumption Day |
| 1 November | Tuesday, All Saints’ Day |
| 2 November | Wednesday, All Souls’ Day |
| 23 December to | Friday | (6 end-of-year days) |
| 30 December | Friday |
| TOTAL: 17 days |

21 April

Maundy Thursday

22 April

Good Friday

25 April

Easter Monday

9 May

Monday, anniversary of the declaration made by President Robert Schuman in 1950

2 June

Thursday, Ascension Day

3 June

Friday, the day following Ascension Day

13 June

Whit Monday

21 July

Thursday, Belgian national holiday

15 August

Monday, Assumption Day

1 November

Tuesday, All Saints’ Day

2 November

Wednesday, All Souls’ Day

23 December to

Friday

(6 end-of-year days)

30 December

Friday

TOTAL: 17 days

LUXEMBOURG: the above mentioned dates also apply to Luxembourg, except that Thursday 21 July is replaced by Thursday 23 June, the Luxembourg national holiday.

Work will resume as normal on Tuesday 3 January 2012.

Without prejudice to the public holiday schedule for 2012, Monday 2 January 2012 shall be deemed a public holiday under that year’s entitlements.

The Commission reserves the right to modify these provisions should the needs of the service so require.

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas M.
Polinsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Joseph A. Geraci, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and



2.       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.







| | /s/
    Douglas M. Polinsky 
| | ----------------------------
| | Douglas M. Polinsky         
| | Chief Executive Officer     
| |                             
| | July 29,
    2019           
| |                             
| |                             
| | /s/ Joseph
    A. Geraci, II
| | Joseph A. Geraci, II        
| | Chief Financial Officer     
| |                             
| | July 29, 2019
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KENDALL RYAN,

Petitioner,

vs. 3:09cv399/LAC/MD

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

SECURITY, et al.,

Respondents.

_____________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration of the Report and Recommendation

of the Magistrate Judge filed on March 8, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). 

No objections have been filed. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, the Report and

Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 8) is dismissed

and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8 day of April, 2010.

th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### PETROU v. HALE

No. 149 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 655.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 February 1980.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 1 9
- 1745

CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY, c/o Hea l thSmart Casu a lty Claims Solutions , Petitioner ,

v. LLOYD LAMBERT ; DIR ECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS ’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR , Respondent s
.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board . ( 18

- 0358

- BLA )

Submitted : January 26, 2021 Decided: January 29, 2021

Before WILKINSON , MOTZ , and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Timothy W

. Gresham , Kendra R. Prince, PENN, STUART & ESKRIDGE , Abingdon, Virginia, for Petitioner. Joseph E. Wolfe , Victoria S. Herman, WOLFE WILLIAMS & REYNOLDS , Norton, Virginia ; Sean G. Bajkowski, Sarah M. Hurley, Office of the So licitor

- Black Lung Division , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent s
.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Clin chfield Coal Company petitions for review of the Benefits Review Board ’s (BRB) decision and order affirming the A dministrative L aw J udge’s (ALJ) award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901

- 94 4

. Our review of the BRB’s decision is
limited to considering “whether substantial evidence supports the factual findings of the ALJ and whether the legal conclusions of the [BRB] and ALJ are rational and consistent with applicable law.” Westmoreland Coal Co. v. Stallard , 876 F.3d 663, 668 (4th Cir.
2017 ) (internal quotation marks omitted). “Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Sea “B” Mining Co. v. Addison , 831 F.3d 244, 252 (4th Cir. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). “To determine whether this standard has been met, we consider whether all of the relevant evidence has been analyzed and whether the ALJ has sufficiently explained [her] rationale in crediting certain evidence.” Hobet Mining, LLC v. Epling , 783 F.3d 498, 504 (4th Cir. 2015) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Our review of the record discloses that the B RB ’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the pet ition for review for the reasons stated by the B RB

. Lambert v. Clinchfield Coal Co. , No. 18

- 0358

- BLA (B.R.B. May 21, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2354 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2354

 To direct the Director of the National Science Foundation to support 
         research on opioid addiction, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2019

Mr. Coons (for himself and Mr. Gardner) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Director of the National Science Foundation to support 
         research on opioid addiction, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; FINDINGS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Expanding Findings 
for Federal Opioid Research and Treatment Act'' or the ``EFFORT Act''.
    (b) Findings.--The Congress finds that--
            (1) research gaps currently exist in the prevention and 
        treatment of opioid addiction;
            (2) the National Science Foundation's research on opioid 
        addiction has increased understanding of the neuroscience of 
        addiction, substance abuse intervention, the role of illicit 
        supply networks, the secondary effects on families, the use of 
        technology to address the opioid epidemic, and options for 
        alternative, non-addictive therapeutics for pain; and
            (3) the National Science Foundation and the National 
        Institutes of Health have recognized that fundamental questions 
        in basic, clinical, and translational research would benefit 
        greatly from multidisciplinary approaches and collaboration.

SEC. 2. NSF SUPPORT OF RESEARCH ON OPIOID ADDICTION.

    The Director of the National Science Foundation, in consultation 
with the Director of the National Institutes of Health, shall support 
merit-reviewed and competitively awarded research on the science of 
opioid addiction.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JOSE ELIAS SEPULVEDA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:01-CV-011-SPM

FLOYD GIPSON,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the pro se Plaintiff’s "Motion in

Limine" (doc. 220) and his “Motion to for Leave of Court to Amend Civil

Complaint” (doc. 221). To date, no response from the Defendant to either

motion has been filed. Plaintiff first requests the exclusion during trial of any

reference to the reason for Plaintiff’s incarceration at the time of the incidents in

question. Plaintiff argues that the prejudicial nature of this information outweighs

any probative value. 

 To resolve this question, the Court looks to Rule 609 of the Federal Rules

of Evidence, which applies to civil as well as criminal cases. Shingleton v. Armor

Velvet Corp., 621 F.2d 180, 183 (5th Cir. 1980). Rule 609 would apply to Plaintiff

if he takes the stand in his case. The fact of Plaintiff's conviction is admissible

under FED. R. EVID. 609(a) if (1) the conviction is for a crime punishable by

Case 1:01-cv-00011-SPM-WCS Document 225 Filed 06/23/08 Page 1 of 2
2

death or imprisonment in excess of one year; (2) the conviction is less than ten

years old; (3) the evidence is being used to attack the witnesses credibility; and

(4) the probative value of admitting the conviction outweighs its prejudicial effect

under a Rule 403 analysis. However, the Court cannot do the proper analysis

without more information regarding the conviction. Plaintiff must supply this

Court with more information regarding the prior conviction in order for the Court

to make a proper determination of its admissibility.

With regard to the motion to amend his original complaint in order to add

new damages, the Court finds that the request is reasonable. Pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a), this Court finds that justice so requires the

granting of leave for Plaintiff to amend his complaint. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

 1. If Plaintiff maintains his motion in limine, he must submit to the

Court additional information about the conviction, including the

offense and the date of the conviction.

 2. If this information is not submitted to this Court, then Plaintiff’s

motion in limine will be deemed withdrawn.

 3. Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend his Complaint (doc. 221) is granted.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-third day of June, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 1:01-cv-00011-SPM-WCS Document 225 Filed 06/23/08 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RENARDO FERGUSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00256-MP-WCS

WALTER A MCNEIL,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 6, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, which recommends that this action be transferred to the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Florida for all further proceedings. Plaintiff has filed no objection to the

Report, and the time to do so has passed. Upon consideration, the Court agrees with the

Magistrate that the Southern District - the district of conviction - is the appropriate venue for

this action. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 6, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein, except that the word “Middle” in the second sentence on

page 2 should have been “Southern” since Broward County is in the Southern

District. 

2. This cause is TRANSFERRED in the interest of justice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§

1404(a) and 1406(a), to the United States District Court for the Southern District

of Florida for all further proceedings

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of January, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case 1:07-cv-03382-HB Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03382-HB Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03382-HB Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03382-HB Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03382-HB Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03382-HB Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03382-HB Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:07-cv-03382-HB Document 1 Filed 04/27/2007 Page 8 of 8
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO. 

### 2023 KW 0737 JAYVONTE PINES 

## OCTOBER23, 2023 In Re: Jayvonte Pines, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 

### 21st

Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. 

### 700414. BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, ANDWOLFE, JJ.



### WRITDENIED.
Exhibit 10.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the period ended
June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ian Louis Murray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/IAN LOUIS MURRAYIan Louis Murray
Chief Financial Officer
July 23, 2003


---

QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LYNN M. PIERCE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv335/RV/MD

BAPTIST HEALTHCARE 

CORPORATION, INC.,

Defendant.

 /

ORDER OF RECUSAL

I hereby recuse myself from all further proceedings in this case. The Clerk shall

reassign this matter to another judge of this Court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2010.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 15-4 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 15-4 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03455-RJH Document 15-4 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 3 of 4