Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BAILEY INDUSTRIES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10mc64/MCR/EMT

CLJP, INC.,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER CONCERNING DISCOVERY DISPUTES

A discovery dispute has been referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge in

the above-styled case (see Doc. 1). In the court’s experience, the great majority of discovery

disputes arise out of (1) a failure to grasp, or a rejection of, the law, including procedural rules, or

the facts, (2) lack of professionalism, (3) lack of civility, (4) refusal to extend common courtesy to

a fellow professional (and therefore to the court), (5) bad faith on the part of one or both parties, or

(6) a combination of the above. Indeed, it is very rare for this court to see a truly justiciable

discovery issue requiring thoughtful consideration and resolution by the court. As the instant

discovery dispute appears to be one of the great majority, counsel will be required to follow the

procedure set forth below in an attempt to resolve the dispute. In short, counsel are advised that

before bringing a discovery dispute to the court, they must exhaust every possibility of resolution,

and they may incur significant financial consequences if they do not prevail in their position.

Accordingly, the parties are ORDERED to proceed as follows: 

1. In an order issued the same date as this order, the non-moving party (i.e., Defendant)

has been directed to respond to a discovery motion by a date certain (hereinafter referred to as the

response date). However, prior to the response date, the parties (i.e., lead counsel or attorneys with

full authority to make decisions) shall be required to personally meet or to confer telephonically (i.e.,
Page 2 of 2

no faxes, e-mails, or voice-mail messages back and forth) in a good-faith effort to resolve the

dispute. The parties are strongly urged to resolve this matter without further intervention of the

court.

2. If the parties are able to completely resolve the issues raised in the discovery motion,

on or before the response date the moving party shall file a notice with the court indicating that the

matter has been resolved. If the matter is fully resolved, the court may or may not ask for briefs on

the appropriateness of sanctions. If the parties are unable to completely resolve the dispute, the nonmoving party shall file a response as directed by this court’s separate order. The response shall

indicate which issues, if any, were resolved during the intervening attorney conference. Any issue

that remains in dispute will be decided by the court. 

3. If the court is required to resolve any part of the discovery matter, the prevailing

party, who will be determined by the court, will be awarded costs and expenses, including, but not

limited to: (1) the time required to personally confer with opposing counsel, (2) the time required

to file its discovery motion or response, and, if necessary, prepare for, travel to, and attend any

hearing on the motion, and (3) the actual costs incurred for court reporting, travel, sustenance and/or

accommodations for a hearing on the motion (if applicable). The costs will be paid by the nonprevailing attorney and not charged to the client unless counsel provides written proof that the client

insisted on proceeding in the discovery matter against counsel’s advice. 

So ORDERED this 23rd day of August 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 3:10mc64/MCR/EMT