alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from SEC Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      18,638,718              22,322,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,402,685               8,208,842
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  7,913,777               6,264,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,120,085              37,053,671
<PP&E>                                     289,211,129             292,048,991
<DEPRECIATION>                            (26,539,539)            (38,114,058)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             338,161,562             329,565,281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,667,144              16,216,637
<BONDS>                                    209,830,918             204,013,946
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            10                      10
<OTHER-SE>                               (108,825,155)           (135,084,227)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               338,161,562             329,565,281
<SALES>                                     32,776,493              65,628,307
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,294,499              68,139,663
<CGS>                                       12,050,495              26,245,012
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,583,843              34,328,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,558,401              12,275,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          19,414,012              43,257,137
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,666,917)            (21,721,632)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,666,917)            (21,721,632)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           (21,336,550)                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (31,003,467)            (21,721,632)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
# C_2009301EN.01000202.xml

| 11.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5642 — SGGF/TRAKYA/SGGE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 301/03

On 3 December 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5642. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5642. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of East Fork Biodiesel, LLC (the “Company”), that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-Q. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

|                      |   |                      |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
| Date:  May 15, 2009  | By:    | /s/Chris L. Daniel        |
|                      |   | Chris L. Daniel           |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer   |
|                      |   |                      |
|                      |   |                      |
| Date:  May 15, 2009  | By:    | /s/ Jack W. Limbaugh, Jr. |
|                      |   | Jack W. Limbaugh, Jr.     |
|                      |   | Treasurer                 |
|                      |   |                      |
#### James A. Wilson *et*al., plaintiffs in error, *vs.*A. A. Bell, administrator, defendant in error.

A widow dying within less time than one year after administration on the estate of her deceased husband, without having made her election to take a child’s part of the real estate, in lieu of her dower, her administrator is not entitled to receive or to recover such child’s part after her death.

Distribution. Election by widow. Before Judge Robinson. Morgan Superior Court. March Adjourned Term, 1871.

This case was an appeal from the'Court of Ordinary upon the distribution of the estate of Briggs H. Moultrie, deceased. Briggs H. Moultrie departed this life in August, 1862, intestate, leaving a widow and six children. His widow, Mary J. Moultrie, died in April, 1863. The defendant in error was appointed administrator, *de bonis*non, on the estate of Briggs H. Moultrie, in March, 1869. The commissioners appointed to make the distribution set apart to the administrator of Mary J. Moultrie one-seventh of the entire estate, she never having elected, during life, to take a child’s part. The remainder of the estate was divided equally between the six children. The Ordinary confirmed this appointment, and an appeal was entered to the Superior Court. There being no question of fact involved, the case was submitted to the *515Court. After argument had, the decision of the Ordinary was affirmed. Whereupon, four of the said children, being by a former wife of said Briggs H. Moultrie, deceased, excepted, and assign said ruling as error.

A. G. *&*F. C. Foster, for plaintiffs in error,

cited Prince’s Digest, 229; Cobb’s New Digest, 230; 9 Ga. R., 189.

McHenry & McHenry, for defendant,

cited Code, sections 2220, 2448, 2447; 9 Ga. R., 189.

Warner, Chief Justice.

This case came on to be heard in the Court below on an appeal from the Court of Ordinary. It appears, from the record, that Moultrie died intestate, in August, 1862, leaving a widow and six children, four of whom were by a former wife, and two by the wife living at the time of his death. In April, 1863, the widow of Moultrie died intestate, and Reid was appointed administrator on her estate. The widow died within the time allowed by law for making her election to take a child’s part of the real estate of her deceased husband, in lieu of dower, and without having made such an election. The Court decided that, in the distribution of the real estate of Moultrie, the intestate, that the administrator of his widow was entitled to receive one share — that is to say, one-seventh part thereof. This was error, according to the ruling of this Court in Beavors *vs.*Winn *et al.,*9 Georgia Reports, 189. The decision of the Court in that case controls the question made by the record in this case.

Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.
# C_2009110EN.01000201.xml

| 14.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 May 2009

2009/C 110/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3623 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,90 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4474 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89980 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,6525 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5054 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8400 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,785 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 281,44 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4118 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1668 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1254 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7883 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5832 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5584 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2749 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9943 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 689,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,4978 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2942 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3476 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 094,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8028 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,376 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,5957 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,040 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8369 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1731 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,7200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3623

JPY

Japanese yen

130,90

DKK

Danish krone

7,4474

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89980

SEK

Swedish krona

10,6525

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5054

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8400

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,785

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

281,44

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4118

RON

Romanian leu

4,1668

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1254

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7883

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5832

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5584

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2749

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9943

KRW

South Korean won

1 689,23

ZAR

South African rand

11,4978

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2942

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3476

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 094,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8028

PHP

Philippine peso

64,376

RUB

Russian rouble

43,5957

THB

Thai baht

47,040

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8369

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1731

INR

Indian rupee

67,7200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### STATE v. WILKERSON & WILKERSON

No. 478P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 240.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982.
# C_2010056EN.01000501.xml

| 6.3.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5783 — Statoil/Svitzer/FTTS (JV))

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 56/02

On 2 March 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5783. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5783. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
EXHIBIT32.1

| (1) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010      of Vycor Medical, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ended June 30, 2010, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Vycor Medical,      Inc. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Kenneth T.      Coviello                                  |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                          |
| Name:  | Kenneth      T. Coviello                                      |
|   |                                                          |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer |
|   |                                                          |
| Date:  | August      13, 2010                                          |

----
# C_2009068EN.01004001.xml

| 21.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/40

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 March 2009

(2009/C 68/10)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3549 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,87 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4515 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,93950 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0560 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5291 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6500 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,628 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,36 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7083 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5662 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2972 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2872 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9685 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6770 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5008 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4240 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0535 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 901,81 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0680 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2509 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4511 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 974,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9352 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,360 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,4920 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,848 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0519 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,1995 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,5170 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3549

JPY

Japanese yen

129,87

DKK

Danish krone

7,4515

GBP

Pound sterling

0,93950

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0560

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5291

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6500

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,628

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,36

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7083

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5662

RON

Romanian leu

4,2972

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2872

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9685

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6770

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5008

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4240

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0535

KRW

South Korean won

1 901,81

ZAR

South African rand

13,0680

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2509

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4511

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 974,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9352

PHP

Philippine peso

65,360

RUB

Russian rouble

45,4920

THB

Thai baht

47,848

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0519

MXN

Mexican peso

19,1995

INR

Indian rupee

68,5170

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Exhibit 32.1 Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Ronald G. Brigham, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Rhino Productions, Inc. (the "Company") certify that:  1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Rhino Productions, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report.  Date: August 14, 2009   /s/ Ronald G. Brigham Ronald G. Brigham, Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 3

Case No. 4:10cv276-RH/WCS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GARY THOMAS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv276-RH/WCS

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING THE PETITION AND

DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

This petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before 

the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF No. 20. No 

objections have been filed. The report and recommendation is correct and is 

adopted as the court’s opinion.

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires a district court to 

“issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to 

the applicant.” Under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability may 

issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-38 (2003); 

Case 4:10-cv-00276-RH-WCS Document 21 Filed 01/18/12 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 4:10cv276-RH/WCS

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000); Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 

893 n.4 (1983); see also Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 402-13 (2000) (setting 

out the standards applicable to a § 2254 petition on the merits). As the Court said 

in Slack:

 To obtain a COA under § 2253(c), a habeas prisoner must make a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a 

demonstration that, under Barefoot, includes showing that reasonable 

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition 

should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues 

presented were “ ‘adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed 

further.’ ” 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 483-84 (quoting Barefoot, 463 U.S. at 893 n.4). Further, in 

order to obtain a certificate of appealability when dismissal is based on procedural 

grounds, a petitioner must show, “at least, that jurists of reason would find it 

debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court 

was correct in its procedural ruling.” Id. at 484. 

The petitioner has not made the required showing. 

For these reasons,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED.

2. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The petition is DENIED with 

prejudice.”

Case 4:10-cv-00276-RH-WCS Document 21 Filed 01/18/12 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 4:10cv276-RH/WCS

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on January 15, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00276-RH-WCS Document 21 Filed 01/18/12 Page 3 of 3
#### BUCK v. RAILROAD

No. 47 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 588.

Petition by defendant Goforth Brothers for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 April 1980. Motion of defendant Railroad to withdraw petition allowed 1 April 1980.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5187 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5187

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1585 Yanceyville Street, Greensboro, North Carolina, as the ``J. 
                  Howard Coble Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2018

 Mr. Walker (for himself, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Holding, Mr. Jones, Mr. 
   Price of North Carolina, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Hudson, Mr. Pittenger, Mr. 
  McHenry, Mr. Meadows, and Mr. Budd) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 1585 Yanceyville Street, Greensboro, North Carolina, as the ``J. 
                  Howard Coble Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. J. HOWARD COBLE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1585 Yanceyville Street, Greensboro, North Carolina, shall 
be known and designated as the ``J. Howard Coble Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``J. Howard 
Coble Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```