alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.5


 


SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


 


The following is a
summary of the compensation terms of the non-executive directors of Cyren Ltd. (the “Company”).


 


At
the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the Company’s shareholders approved the following compensation for
its non-executive directors, to remain in effect from the shareholder approval date of July 30, 2019:


 


		1)	Annual Cash Compensation:



 


		●	All eligible non-executive directors will receive $7,500
per quarter; and



 


		●	A non-executive director serving as a Lead Director will
receive $15,000 per quarter.



 


		2)	Equity Compensation:



 


	 	●	New
                                         non-executive directors are currently entitled to an initial grant of 50,000 options.





	 	 	 
		●	All
                                         eligible non-executive directors will be granted 20,000 restricted stock units per year;



 


		●	A non-executive director serving as the Lead Director will
receive a grant of 30,000 restricted stock units per year for such services; and



 


		●	A non-executive director serving as the Chairperson of
the Audit Committee will be granted 4,000 additional restricted stock units per year for such services.



 


Other than the foregoing
cash compensation and equity compensation, the Company does not compensate its non-executive directors for serving on its board
of directors. Non-executive directors are reimbursed for expenses associated with their service on the board of directors.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SHERRIE RUSSELL-BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK

ROBERT H JERRY, II, LEVIN COLLEGE OF LAW, THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, THE

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s request, Doc. 122, for leave to file a reply to

Defendants’ motion, Doc. 121, in opposition to Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion to Strike, Doc.

107. Plaintiff would like to correct alleged deficiencies in Defendants’ factual and legal

assertions. Plaintiff requests until close of business Monday, August 9, 2010 to file her reply, so

as to afford the opposing party enough time to review the reply before the hearing. Motion for

Leave to File a Reply, Doc. 122, is GRANTED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of August, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Ravalli County Resource Advisory Committee will be meeting for a presentation from James Peterson with the Evergreen Foundation and hold a short public forum (question and answer session). The meeting is being held pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-393). The meeting is open to the public.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on November 27, 2007, 6:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held at the Bitterroot National Forest Supervisor Building, 1801 N 1st Street, Hamilton, Montana. Send written comments to Dan Ritter, District Ranger, Stevensville Ranger District, 88 Main Street, Stevensville, MT 59870, by facsimile (406) 777-7423, or electronically to                         *dritter@fs.fed.us.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dan Ritter, Stevensville District Ranger and Designated Federal Officer, Phone: (406) 777-5461.

Dated: November 6, 2007.

David T. Bull,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-5638  Filed 11-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AAA Public Adjusting Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Frederick Antonelli, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  August 10, 2009 | /s/ Frederick Antonelli              
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                       | Chief Executive Officer and President



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AAA Public Adjusting Group, Inc and will be retained by AAA Public Adjusting Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Report of Independent Public Accountants

 

To Household Finance Corporation:

We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States, the consolidated financial statements of Household Finance Corporation (the "Company") and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and have issued our report thereon dated January 14, 2002.  We have not audited any financial statements of the Company as of any date or for any period subsequent to December 31, 2001, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report on those statements.

In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the Company was not in compliance with any of the terms, covenants, provisions, or conditions of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated November 1, 1996, in conjunction with the Revolving Home Equity Loan Asset Backed Certificates Series 1996-2, insofar as they relate to accounting matters.  It should be noted, however, that our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance.

As a part of our audit, we made a study and evaluation of the Companys system of internal accounting controls over the Companys home equity loan portfolio, including those loans serviced under the Agreement to the extent we considered necessary to evaluate the system as required by generally accepted auditing standards.  In accordance with these standards, the purpose of our study and evaluation, which included obtaining an understanding of the accounting systems, was to determine the nature, timing and extent of the auditing procedures necessary for expressing an opinion on the financial statements.  Our study and evaluation also took into consideration certain of the criteria and audit requirements in the Audit Guide for Audits of Non-Supervised Mortgages Approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development.  However, certain procedures included in the audit guide are not applicable to the home equity loans being serviced for the Trustee, and therefore, were not performed.

Our audit disclosed no exceptions or errors in records relating to home equity loans serviced for the Trustee that, in our opinion, Section 3.10 of the Agreement required us to report.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors and management of the Company and should not be used for any other purpose.

Arthur Andersen LLP

Chicago, Illinois

January 14, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ADRIAN JAMES WOOD,

Petitioner, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-200/RS-EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent. 

_________________________________________ /

UAMORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 40). No 

objections have been filed. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated 

by reference in this Order. 

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 6) is DENIED. 

3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Plaintiff has not made a 

substantial showing of a denial of a Constitutional right. 

ORDERED on June 29, 2012.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00200-RS-EMT Document 42 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

CHRISTOPHER SCOTT DANGIM, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

v. 

FNU LNU, USA Law Enforcement; FNU 

LNU, Rio Rancho Police; FNU LNU, 

Sandoval County Sherriffs; FNU LNU, 

Docs and Mental Health; FNU SALAZAR, 

Officer, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

No. 17-2156 

(D.C. No. 1:16-CV-00812-JB-SCY) 

(D. N.M.) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________ 

Before HARTZ, HOLMES, and BACHARACH, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

 Christopher Scott Dangim appeals from the district court’s dismissal without 

prejudice of his claims against the United States, the court’s dismissal without prejudice 

of his claims against state officers under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and the court’s decision to 

decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his remaining state-law claims. 

 

*

 After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined 

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of 

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore 

ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding 

precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral 

estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with 

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals 

Tenth Circuit 

January 30, 2018

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
2

2 

 We AFFIRM the judgment below. The district court bent over backwards to 

discern claims in Mr. Dangim’s pleadings and patiently explained why the claims under 

federal law must fail. Mr. Dangim’s brief in this court points to no errors by the district 

court. In addition, the district court acted well within its discretion in declining to 

exercise supplemental jurisdiction over state-law claims. We DENY Mr. Dangim’s 

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

Entered for the Court 

Harris L Hartz 

Circuit Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00385-MP-WCS

BANK OF AMERICA CHECK #0431167, IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,700.00 SEIZED FROM

FL DOC ID MO5108, IN THE NAME OF ALEJANDRO FERRER,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

DECREE OF FORFEITURE

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 6, Motion for Decree of Property, filed by the

United States of America. On September 8, 2011, a Verified Complaint of Forfeiture In Rem

against the defendant property, Bank of America Check #0431167, in the amount of $3,700.00

seized from FL DOC ID MO5108, in the name of Alejandro Ferrer, was filed on behalf of the

Plaintiff, United States of America. The Complaint alleges that the defendant property is

forfeitable to the United States of America pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section

981(a)(1)(A).

It appears that process was fully issued in this action according to law. A Notice of

Forfeiture Action was published on an official government Internet site, www.forfeiture.gov, for

30 consecutive days beginning October 26, 2010, pursuant to Rule G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the

Supplemental Rules of Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.

No person or entity has filed a claim. Accordingly, it is hereby 

Case 4:10-cv-00385-MP-WCS Document 7 Filed 07/12/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant property, Bank of America Check #0431167, in the amount of

$3,700.00 seized from FL DOC ID MO5108, in the name of Alejandro Ferrer,

shall be forfeited to the United States of America and no right, title or interest in

the property shall exist in any other party. The defendant property shall be

disposed of according to law.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 4:10-cv-00385-MP-WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00385-MP-WCS Document 7 Filed 07/12/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009262EN.01000301.xml

| 4.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/3

---

Publication of the countervalue in national currencies of the values expressed in euro in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 116/2009 and the Annex to Council Directive 93/7/EEC

2009/C 262/05

Pursuant to the requirement under Annex I.B of Council Regulation (EC) No 116/2009 and point B of the Annex to Council Directive 93/7/EEC, as modified by Directives 96/100/EC and 2001/38/EC, the values of the financial thresholds applicable to certain categories of cultural goods shall be converted and expressed in national currencies and published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union.

This calculation is based on the average daily value of those currencies, expressed in euro, during the 24 months ending on the last day of August 2009 and takes effect on 31 December 2009.

| EUR | 1 | 15 000 | 30 000 | 50 000 | 150 000 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DKK Danish krone | 7,4531 | 111 796,50 | 223 593,00 | 372 655,00 | 1 117 965,00 |
| GBP Pound sterling | 0,8106 | 12 159,00 | 24 318,00 | 40 530,00 | 121 590,00 |
| SEK Swedish krona | 9,94706 | 149 205,90 | 298 411,80 | 497 353,00 | 1 492 059,00 |
| BGN Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 | 29 337,00 | 58 674,00 | 97 790,00 | 293 370,00 |
| CZK Czech koruna | 25,8926 | 388 389,00 | 776 778,00 | 1 294 630,00 | 3 883 890,00 |
| EEK Estonian kroon | 15,6466 | 234 699,00 | 469 398,00 | 782 330,00 | 2 346 990,00 |
| HUF Hungarian forint | 262,8939 | 3 943 408,50 | 7 886 817,00 | 13 144 695,00 | 39 434 085,00 |
| LTL Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 | 51 792,00 | 103 584,00 | 172 640,00 | 517 920,00 |
| LVL Latvian lats | 0,7031 | 10 546,50 | 21 093,00 | 35 155,00 | 105 465,00 |
| PLN Polish zloty | 3,839 | 57 585,00 | 115 170,00 | 191 950,00 | 575 850,00 |
| RON Romanian leu | 3,8215 | 57 322,50 | 114 645,00 | 191 075,00 | 573 225,00 |

EUR

1

15 000

30 000

50 000

150 000

DKK Danish krone

7,4531

111 796,50

223 593,00

372 655,00

1 117 965,00

GBP Pound sterling

0,8106

12 159,00

24 318,00

40 530,00

121 590,00

SEK Swedish krona

9,94706

149 205,90

298 411,80

497 353,00

1 492 059,00

BGN Bulgarian lev

1,9558

29 337,00

58 674,00

97 790,00

293 370,00

CZK Czech koruna

25,8926

388 389,00

776 778,00

1 294 630,00

3 883 890,00

EEK Estonian kroon

15,6466

234 699,00

469 398,00

782 330,00

2 346 990,00

HUF Hungarian forint

262,8939

3 943 408,50

7 886 817,00

13 144 695,00

39 434 085,00

LTL Lithuanian litas

3,4528

51 792,00

103 584,00

172 640,00

517 920,00

LVL Latvian lats

0,7031

10 546,50

21 093,00

35 155,00

105 465,00

PLN Polish zloty

3,839

57 585,00

115 170,00

191 950,00

575 850,00

RON Romanian leu

3,8215

57 322,50

114 645,00

191 075,00

573 225,00

---
# C_2009227EN.01000301.xml

| 22.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 227/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 227/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 September 2009

2009/C 227/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4658 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4413 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90660 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1390 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5182 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6500 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,167 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,37 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7038 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1590 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2678 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1875 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7017 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5780 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3609 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0830 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0788 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 766,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0155 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0098 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2915 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 218,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1010 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,903 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,5400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,434 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6625 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5318 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,3730 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4658

JPY

Japanese yen

135,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4413

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90660

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1390

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5182

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6500

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,167

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,37

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7038

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1590

RON

Romanian leu

4,2678

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1875

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7017

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5780

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3609

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0830

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0788

KRW

South Korean won

1 766,41

ZAR

South African rand

11,0155

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0098

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2915

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 218,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1010

PHP

Philippine peso

69,903

RUB

Russian rouble

44,5400

THB

Thai baht

49,434

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6625

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5318

INR

Indian rupee

70,3730

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DWIGHT J. PORTER,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-206/RS-GRJ

COLONEL BAXTER, et al.,

Defendants. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 52). 

Defendants Colonel Baxter, Captain Lee, and Assistant Warden Dudley filed objections. 

(See Doc. 53). I have considered those objections de novo. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated 

by reference in this Order. 

2. Defendants Simmons and Durance’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 40) is GRANTED. 

3. Defendant Lee’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 40) is DENIED. 

4. Defendant Tyus’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 48) is GRANTED. 

5. Defendant Baxter’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 48) is DENIED. 

6. Defendants Simmons, Durrance and Tyus are DROPPED as parties to this case 

because of Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 

Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 54 Filed 03/02/12 Page 1 of 2
7. The case remains open pending further proceedings against Defendants Lee, 

Dudley, and Baxter. 

ORDERED on March 2, 2012.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00206-RS-GRJ Document 54 Filed 03/02/12 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. JOHNSON

No. 54.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 323.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for failure to file appeal bond allowed 15 September 1972.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

DEAN DELLINGER, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No.: 3:10cv323/RS/EMT 

INTERNATIONAL RARITIES 

CORPORATION and INTERNATIONAL 

RARITIES HOLDINGS, INC., 

 Defendants. 

_________________________________/ 

RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 Defendant, International Rarities Corporation (“IRC”), responds to the 

Court’s June 13, 2011 Order to Show Cause (Doc. 73) as follows: 

1. IRC recently began consulting with bankruptcy attorneys in its home 

state of Minnesota regarding a potential reorganization of its business. IRC has 

determined such a reorganization is appropriate and necessary. 

2. IRC did not attend the depositions that are the subject of Plaintiff’s 

pending motion based on the belief that it needed to devote limited resources to 

pursuing that reorganization as quickly as possible. Moreover, based on 

preliminary discussions with bankruptcy attorneys in Minnesota, IRC believed that 

a bankruptcy petition was imminent. 

Case 3:10-cv-00323-RS-EMT Document 76 Filed 06/17/11 Page 1 of 3
3. IRC is continuing consultations with bankruptcy counsel in Minnesota 

and believes a reorganization of its business is likely to occur within the next 

several weeks. 

4. IRC informs the undersigned counsel that it does contest the various 

allegations made by Plaintiff in this case, and that it therefore opposes Plaintiff’s 

motion for sanctions to the extent that motion requests the entry of a default 

judgment. 

5. To be clear, IRC acknowledges that it was advised by the undersigned 

counsel that it was obligated to respond and fully participate in discovery in this 

case unless and until an automatic stay was entered. 

* * * 

2

Case 3:10-cv-00323-RS-EMT Document 76 Filed 06/17/11 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I CERTIFY that a copy hereof has been filed via CM/ECF for electronic 

distribution to the counsel of record listed below on June 17, 2011: 

 Joseph A. Zarzaur, Jr. 

 Zarzaur Law, P.A. 

 11 E. Romana Street 

 Pensacola, FL 32502 

 /s/ W. Lee Elebash 

 CHARLES WIGGINS 

 Fla. Bar No.: 0048021 

 ctw@beggslane.com 

 W. LEE ELEBASH 

 Fla. Bar. No.: 0074737 

 wle@beggslane.com 

 501 Commendencia Street 

 Pensacola, FL 32502 

 (850) 432-2451 

 BEGGS & LANE, RLLP 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

3

Case 3:10-cv-00323-RS-EMT Document 76 Filed 06/17/11 Page 3 of 3