alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2010191EN.01000801.xml

| 15.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/8

---

Call for proposals 2010 for financial contributions to the functioning of European consumer organisations

(Action 5 of Decision No 1926/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme of Community action in the field of consumer policy (2007-2013))

(Action 5 of Decision No 1926/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme of Community action in the field of consumer policy (2007-2013))

(Text with EEA relevance)

2010/C 191/06

| 1. | In conformity with Article 7 of the Decision No 1926/2006/EC, on 21 December 2009 the European Commission adopted the annual work programme in the area of consumer policy for 2010. The Work Programme contains further information about the objectives, priorities, indicative budget and types of actions and the eligibility rules for applying for a grant from the European Union under the Consumer Programme. This document is available on the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC) website under: http://ec.europa.eu/eahc/consumers |
| --- | --- |

1.

In conformity with Article 7 of the Decision No 1926/2006/EC, on 21 December 2009 the European Commission adopted the annual work programme in the area of consumer policy for 2010. The Work Programme contains further information about the objectives, priorities, indicative budget and types of actions and the eligibility rules for applying for a grant from the European Union under the Consumer Programme. This document is available on the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers (EAHC) website under: http://ec.europa.eu/eahc/consumers

| 2. | In particular the present call for proposals aims at providing financial contributions — in the form of operating grants — to the functioning of European consumer organisations through the conclusion of framework partnership agreements for a duration of four years — covering the operating years 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 — thus establishing a long-term cooperation (partnerships) between the Agency and the selected partners. |
| --- | --- |

2.

In particular the present call for proposals aims at providing financial contributions — in the form of operating grants — to the functioning of European consumer organisations through the conclusion of framework partnership agreements for a duration of four years — covering the operating years 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 — thus establishing a long-term cooperation (partnerships) between the Agency and the selected partners.

| 3. | The full text of the call for proposals and related documents are available on the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers website under: http://ec.europa.eu/eahc/consumers/consumers_calls.html |
| --- | --- |

3.

The full text of the call for proposals and related documents are available on the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers website under: http://ec.europa.eu/eahc/consumers/consumers_calls.html

---
CHRISTOPHER WATSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4516

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 1, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Roberto Arias, Judge.

Christopher Watson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kathryn Lane, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2010041EN.01000501.xml

| 18.2.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/5

---

Call for proposals under the annual work programme for grants in the field of the Trans-European Energy Network (TEN-E) for 2010

(Commission Decision C(2010) 48)

2010/C 41/05

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, is hereby launching a call for proposals in order to award grants to projects in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the draft annual work programme for grants in the field of the Trans-European Energy Network for 2010.

The maximum amount available under this call for proposals, for 2010, is EUR 20 760 000.

The call is closing on 30 April 2010.

The complete text of the call for proposals is available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/infrastructure/grants/index_en.htm

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

JAMES R. CLARK, )

)

Petitioner, )

v. ) No. 2:10-cv-16-WTL-TAB

)

HELEN J. MARBERRY, Warden, )

)

Respondent. )

Entry Directing Further Proceedings

I.

The petitioner’s inclusion of Judge Maurice M. Paul is stricken as improper.

II.

Petitioner James R. Clark is confined within this District and seeks a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3). He challenges the validity of his conviction

entered in the Northern District of Florida. 

The petitioner may have an uphill path to travel in demonstrating that a remedy via

§ 2241(c)(3) should be available to him. And it is his burden to show that such a remedy

is the proper one. Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir. 2001); Charles v.

Chandler, 180 F.3d 753, 756 (6th Cir. 1999).

A writ of habeas corpus via § 2241 may be utilized by a federal prisoner to challenge

the legality of his or her conviction or sentence in those cases where § 2255 is “inadequate

or ineffective to test the legality of [the] detention.” 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). A remedy via §

2255 is "inadequate" when its provisions limiting multiple § 2255 motions prevent a prisoner

from obtaining review of a legal theory that "establishes the petitioner's actual innocence."

Taylor v. Gilkey, 314 F.3d 832, 835 (7th Cir. 2002). 

On the basis of the foregoing, therefore, the petitioner shall have through February

12, 2010, in which to show cause why this action can proceed under § 2241 or why, in the

alternative, it should not be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern

District of Florida. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

 _______________________________ 

 Hon. William T. Lawrence, Judge 

 United States District Court 

 Southern District of Indiana

01/20/2010
Distribution:

James R. Clark

No. 24581-079

Terre Haute-FCI

Federal Correctional Institution

P.O. Box 33

Terre Haute, IN 47808
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Housing Finance Board

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Shelia Willis, Paralegal Specialist, Office of General Counsel, at 202-408-2876 or                         *williss@fhfb.gov.*

Dated: December 5, 2007. 

By the Federal Housing Finance Board. 

Neil R. Crowley, 

Acting General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 07-6004 Filed 12-6-07; 8:55 am] 

BILLING CODE 6725-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65311-65314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal No. 08-14]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-14 with attached transmittal, and 
policy justification.

    Dated: November 13, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 65312]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN20NO07.005


[[Page 65313]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN20NO07.006


[[Page 65314]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN20NO07.007

[FR Doc. 07-5757 Filed 11-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C[FEDREG][VOL]*[/VOL][NO]*[/NO][DATE]*[/
DATE][NOTICES]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           69306
<SECURITIES>                                      9044
<RECEIVABLES>                                    38991
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      41501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                163576
<PP&E>                                          147898
<DEPRECIATION>                                   58491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  284939
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            82424
<BONDS>                                          29050
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         45303
<OTHER-SE>                                       92525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    284939
<SALES>                                         142770
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                142770
<CGS>                                           101659
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   101659
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  29408
<INCOME-TAX>                                      8239
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              21169
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     21169
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IVAN HARVEY,

 Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 3:09cv402/WS/CJK

EFIONG O. ANDEM, et al.,

 Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This civil rights case is before the court upon plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary

Dismissal (doc. 112) and a joint Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (doc. 113) filed by

plaintiff and the defendants. The Notice states that the issues between the parties

have been resolved through settlement, and that the parties stipulate to the entry of

an order dismissing the claims against the defendants with prejudice, pursuant toRule

41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this cause be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 20th day of September, 2011.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00402-WS-CJK Document 114 Filed 09/20/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object

may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636;

United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Case No: 3:09cv402/WS/CJK 

Case 3:09-cv-00402-WS-CJK Document 114 Filed 09/20/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STEPHEN C. GREGORY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv241/MCR/CJK

HON. DAVID MORGAN, in his 

official capacity as Sheriff of 

Escambia County, Florida; and 

CHRISTIAN A. COAD, individually

and in his capacity as an Escambia

County Sheriff’s Deputy,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

On April 22, 2011, this court issued an order (doc. 23) directing the parties to file a

status report regarding the completion of court-ordered mediation and, in the event the

parties had not yet mediated, to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed against

both counsel, including possible dismissal of the action without prejudice. Although the

defendant responded, indicating that the parties had not mediated the case, the plaintiff did

not. The court thus entered an order on May 3, 2011, directing the plaintiff to show cause

within five days why the action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order

of the court and advising the plaintiff that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of the

action (doc. 25). Once again, the plaintiff has not responded, much less responded timely. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this cause of action is dismissed without 

Case 3:10-cv-00241-MCR-CJK Document 26 Filed 05/11/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

prejudice for the plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order. The clerk shall enter

judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of May, 2011.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:10cv241/MCR/CJK

Case 3:10-cv-00241-MCR-CJK Document 26 Filed 05/11/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009226EN.01000601.xml

| 19.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 226/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 226/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 September 2009

2009/C 226/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4705 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4407 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90030 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1125 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5146 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6410 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,089 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 271,18 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7031 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1293 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2653 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1691 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6934 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5752 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3966 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0708 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0803 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 776,37 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,9522 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0404 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2910 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 263,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1173 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,143 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,5000 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,563 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6571 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,4944 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,7830 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4705

JPY

Japanese yen

134,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4407

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90030

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1125

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5146

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6410

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,089

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

271,18

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7031

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1293

RON

Romanian leu

4,2653

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1691

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6934

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5752

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3966

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0708

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0803

KRW

South Korean won

1 776,37

ZAR

South African rand

10,9522

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0404

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2910

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 263,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1173

PHP

Philippine peso

70,143

RUB

Russian rouble

44,5000

THB

Thai baht

49,563

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6571

MXN

Mexican peso

19,4944

INR

Indian rupee

70,7830

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2010178EN.01000501.xml

| 3.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 July 2010

2010/C 178/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2548 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 109,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4497 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82520 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5520 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3376 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,0630 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,753 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 285,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7097 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1545 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3013 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9742 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4864 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3340 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7794 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8056 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7484 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 542,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6940 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4964 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,1935 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 11 374,57 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0467 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,385 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 39,0801 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,671 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,2377 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3877 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 58,7200 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2548

JPY

Japanese yen

109,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4497

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82520

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5520

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3376

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,0630

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,753

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

285,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7097

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1545

RON

Romanian leu

4,3013

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9742

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4864

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3340

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7794

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8056

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7484

KRW

South Korean won

1 542,11

ZAR

South African rand

9,6940

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4964

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,1935

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

11 374,57

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0467

PHP

Philippine peso

58,385

RUB

Russian rouble

39,0801

THB

Thai baht

40,671

BRL

Brazilian real

2,2377

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3877

INR

Indian rupee

58,7200

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 4.97
 
 Subscription Agreement


SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
        Recordals











Conditions Precedent


Warranties
            Confidentiality


Duration and Termination
                 
 Announcements





The Company Physical:
  Postal:
  Telefax:              
  011  482  4641 E-mail:
  Attention:          
  N
 Khumo Gold SPV: Physical:
  Postal:
  Telefax:              
  (011) 457 6901 Email:
  Attention:
    
    
  
 
 
 
 
 
  Counterparts





/s/ JWC Sayers JWC Sayers Chief Financial Officer for and on behalf of
   /s/ MP Ncholo MP Ncholo Director for and on behalf of:  Khumo Gold SPV in the presence of:
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Knology, Inc. 

West Point, Georgia 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-136566 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement No. 333-89179 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-136570, 333-127113, 333-103248 and 333-34540 on Form S-8 ofKnology, Inc. of our reports dated March 14, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of Knology, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting which appear in this Form 10-K. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 14, 2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7366

ROBERT TYRONE MORGAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER, Maryland Division of Corrections; WARDEN, Baltimore City Detention Center; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-1405-H)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Tyrone Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Morgan

v. Commissioner, No. CA-96-1405-H (D. Md. Aug. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED