alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011359EN.01001201.xml

| 9.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/12

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2011/C 359/09

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

Page 63

Page 63

The Explanatory Notes to subheading 1209 91 90 are amended as follows:

1209 91 90

‘1209 91 90   Other

This subheading includes the seeds of pumpkins when used for sowing.

See also the Explanatory Notes to subheading 1207 99 97 and to subheading 1212 99 70.’

Page 65

Page 65

In the Explanatory Notes to subheading 1212 99 70, the last sentence is amended as follows:

1212 99 70

‘Pumpkin seeds (headings 1207 or 1209) are not included in this subheading, with the exception of shelled pumpkin seeds, which are to be classified under heading 1212 in accordance with the provisions laid down in the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-229/06.’

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
ORDER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0737

IN THE MATTER OF 

A.N.C. and J.M.C.,

Youths in Need of Care

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant Father, M.C.’s, motion to 

consolidate, and good cause appearing therefore, Appellant’s motion is 

GRANTED and Cause Nos. DA 23-0737 and DA 23-0739 are hereby 

consolidated under Cause No. DA 23-0737 and henceforth captioned as 

above.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 7 2024

02/07/2024
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

WANDA LOU BURGESS

and DANNY BURGESS

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv81/RS-EMT

HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,

HOLMES COUNTY ROAD

DEPARTMENT, and DON BENTON,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction (Doc. 3). 

One of the elements required before a district court may grant a preliminary 

injunction is a showing by the movant that it has a substantial likelihood of success 

on the merits of the case. Horton v. City of St. Augustine, 272 F. 3d 1318, 1326 

(11th Cir. 2001). Plaintiffs cannot satisfy this element, because it is doubtful that 

this case presents issues for federal jurisdiction. 

A takings clause claim does not become ripe unless the state provides no 

remedy to compensate the landowner for the taking. Bickerstaff Clay Products Co. 

v. Harris County, 89 F.3d 1481, 1490-91 (11th Cir. 1996). Florida courts have 
2

long recognized that an inverse-condemnation remedy is available for alleged 

takings violations. See Busse v. Lee County, 317 Fed. Appx. 968, 972 (11th Cir. 

2009). Furthermore, Florida law provides a remedy for landowners who dispute 

the “dedication” of a road to the public. Fla. Stat. § 95.361(4). Plaintiffs do not

allege that they have unsuccessfully pursued the available state procedures. Thus, 

their takings claim is not ripe and this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. 

Without subject matter jurisdiction, it is impossible for Plaintiffs to succeed on the 

merits of the case. Therefore, the Plaintiffs have failed to satisfy the first 

requirement for a preliminary injunction.

Plaintiffs argue that subject matter jurisdiction is present because they are 

making a challenge based on the “public use clause,” which was found to confer 

federal jurisdiction in another case brought by Plaintiffs’ counsel, Hughes v. 

Holmes Co. Brd. of Co. Comm’rs et. al., 5:03-cv-265/RV-MD. However, the 

Eleventh Circuit has held that reaching the “public use” issue is error when a 

takings claim is not yet ripe. Bickerstaff Clay Products Co. v. Harris County, 89 

F.3d 1481, 1489 n. 14 (11th Cir. 1996).

It is unnecessary to have a hearing on the factual issues of Plaintiffs’ motion

since Plaintiffs cannot satisfy the first element required for a preliminary 

injunction–likelihood of success on the merits–without federal jurisdiction. 

Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 3) is denied. 
3

ORDERED on May 7, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 10.23

 



 

12 July 2012

 

Dear Mike:

 

It was great to speak with you again today, and I am very glad to hear things are going well.  As we discussed, U.S. Dry Cleaning Services Corporation (the “Company”) would like to resolve this matter amicably and therefore proposes the following:

 

Issuance to you, Michael Smith (“Smith”) of 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and 30,000 warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock with a strike price equal 50% of the IPO price or $5.00 per share, whichever is lower.

 

In exchange for the consideration provided above, Smith agrees to waive and release all claims, damages, demands, debts, liabilities, losses, obligations, suits, actions and causes of action, of every kind and character whatsoever, at law or in equity, whether or not known, suspected or claimed, which Smith has or might otherwise have had against the Company, including all of its former or current officers, directors, agents, employees and related entities, arising prior to the date Smith executes this Agreement, regarding any aspect of Smith’s engagement, compensation, and/or the cessation of Smith’s engagement with the Company, other than with respect to the Company’s obligations pursuant to this letter.

 

This letter signed by the Company and Smith contains the entire agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof, and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous oral and written agreements.

 

 

	
Dated:
    	
12,   July 2012
    	
 
    	
SMITH:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
/S/   MICHAEL SMITH
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Michael   Smith
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
U.S.   DRY CLEANING SERVICES CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Dated:
    	
JULY   15, 2012
    	
 
    	
/S/   ALEX BOND
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Alex   Bond, Chief Executive Officer
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5238 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1234 Saint Johns Place in Brooklyn, New 

York, as the ‘‘Major Robert Odell Owens Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5238 EH

1 SECTION 1. MAJOR ROBERT ODELL OWENS POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1234 Saint Johns Place in 

4 Brooklyn, New York, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Major Robert Odell Owens Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Major Robert Odell 

10 Owens Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2018. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5238 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOwens Post Office’’. Brooklyn, New York, as the ‘‘Major Robert Odell al Service located at 1234 Saint Johns Place in
# C_2010015EN.01000201.xml

| 21.1.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 January 2010

2010/C 15/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4132 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4422 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86920 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1165 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4763 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1335 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,890 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 268,99 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7085 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0232 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1278 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0735 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5468 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4771 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,9753 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9587 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9763 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 605,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,6011 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,6481 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2930 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 193,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7547 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 65,119 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,0140 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,571 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5275 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,9360 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 64,9370 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4132

JPY

Japanese yen

128,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4422

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86920

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1165

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4763

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1335

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,890

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

268,99

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7085

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0232

RON

Romanian leu

4,1278

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0735

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5468

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4771

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,9753

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9587

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9763

KRW

South Korean won

1 605,93

ZAR

South African rand

10,6011

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,6481

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2930

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 193,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7547

PHP

Philippine peso

65,119

RUB

Russian rouble

42,0140

THB

Thai baht

46,571

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5275

MXN

Mexican peso

17,9360

INR

Indian rupee

64,9370

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





The Board of Directors


Rogue Wave Software, Inc:





We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-16749, 333-48485 and 333-48525) on Form S-8 of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. of our report dated October 31, 2002, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended September 30, 2002, which report appears in the September 30, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K, of Rogue Wave Software, Inc.





KPMG LLP





Boulder, Colorado


December 10, 2002
#### ROY LEE GODLEY v. W. H. WHICHARD.

(Filed 28 February, 1962.)

1. Negligence § 37b—

The proprietor of a swimming resort operated for hire, while not an insurer of his patrons’ safety, is under duty to exercise due care to see that the place and the appliances incident to its use are reasonably safe.

2. Negligence § 37f—

Evidence that defendant operated a pier for public bathing, that along the pier were signs designating the various depths of the water, and that plaintiff dived to his injury in water some three and one-half feet deep at a point where a sign designated a depth of six feet, is sufficient to be submitted to the jury on the issue of negligence.

Winbobne, O.J., not sitting.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Parker, J.,*September 1961 Term, Beaufort Superior Court.

Civil action to recover for personal injury the plaintiff sustained when he dived from a pier maintained by the defendant as a public bathing resort on the Pamlico River. The plaintiff’s evidence tended to show he paid the required fees for locker and bathing privileges and proceeded along the pier which extended from the shore for several hundred feet into the river. The pier was approximately three feet above the water line. At intervals throughout its length, signs were posted showing the depth of the water beginning at two feet near the shore and gradually increasing to six feet at the point where the pier formed an L. The plaintiff walked along the pier, observed the signs, and near the L, where according to the sign the depth was six feet, he dived headfirst into the water, struck the bottom, breaking both wrists and three vertebrae in his neck. The water was dingy. The bottom was not visible. The actual depth was three or three and one-half feet.

At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the court entered judgment of involuntary nonsuit, from which the plaintiff appealed.

*Hallett S. Ward, LeRoy Scott for plaintiff appellant.*

*Rodman & Rodman, John A. Wilkinson for defendant appellee.*

Per Curiam.

The proprietor of a swimming resort operated for hire is not an insurer of the patron’s safety. He must, however, exercise due care to see the place and appliances incident to its use are reasonably safe. A proprietor may not mislead a patron by false statements *468of the water’s depth. The evidence at the trial was sufficient to go to the jury on the issue of defendant’s actionable negligence. Consequently, the judgment of nonsuit is reversed in order that the jury may determine the issues raised by the pleadings.

Reversed.

WlNBORNE, C.J., not sitting.
# C_2009248EN.01S00301.xml

| 16.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/s3

---

NOTICE

NOTICE

On 16 October 2009, in the Official Journal of the European Union C 248 A, the ‘Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species — 28th complete edition’ will be published.

Official Journal of the European Union

Subscribers to the Official Journal may obtain the same number of copies and language versions of this Official Journal as those to which they subscribe free of charge. They are requested to return the attached order form, duly completed and bearing their subscription registration number (code appearing on the left of each label and beginning with: O/...). This Official Journal will remain available free of charge for one year from the date of its publication.

Non-subscribers can order this Official Journal against payment from one of our sales offices (see http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).

This Official Journal — like all Official Journals (L, C, CA, CE) — can be consulted free of charge online at http://eur-lex.europa.eu

Image

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JULIA A. DENSON, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cv278-SPM/WCS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorney’s

Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Doc. 25. Defendant filed a

response (doc. 26) advising that it does not object to the requested award so

long as it is subject to offset by the Department of Treasury. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s Petition for Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Access to

Justice Act (doc. 25) is granted.

2. The Commissioner is directed to pay Plaintiff or her assignee,

Attorney Heather Freeman of Daley, DeBofsky & Bryant, $3,752.89, which are

reasonable fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §

Case 4:10-cv-00278-SPM-WCS Document 27 Filed 10/18/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2412.

3. The United States Department of Treasury may apply the payment 

to offset a debt owed by Plaintiff in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct.

2521 (2010).

 DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of October, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

 CASE NO.: 4:10cv278-SPM/WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00278-SPM-WCS Document 27 Filed 10/18/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009115EN.01001701.xml

| 20.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/17

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/174/09

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2009/C 115/04

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition EPSO/AD/174/09 to recruit conference interpreters (AD 5/AD 7) with Polish as their main language.

The competition notice is published in Official Journal C 115 A of 20 May 2009 in Polish only.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 246 (Wednesday, December 26, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 72915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-55522]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 23


Airworthiness Standards: Normal, Utility, Acrobatic, and Commuter 
Category Airplanes

CFR Correction

    In Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 59, 
revised as of January 1, 2007, on page 227, in Sec.  23.561, remove the 
five paragraphs beginning with the second paragraph (d)(1)(i) through 
paragraph (d)(1)(v).
[FR Doc. 07-55522 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 24, 2014

s0616 

# Order

Clerk June 24, 2014

148842

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148842

COA: 305426

Saginaw CC: 10

- 035084

- FC

DEVON SHIVERS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 28, 2014

judgm ent of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Form 20-FEXHIBIT 13.1July 29, 2013   

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,**

**OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18U.S.C.1350)**

**ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

** **

** **

In connection with the Annual Report of CanAlaskaUranium Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended April 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Dasler, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)	theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result 	of the operationsof the Company.

 

 

Date:	July 29, 2013

 

***“Peter Dasler”	***

Peter Dasler

Chief Executive Officer

** **

** **

** **
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications



We are the Principal Executive Officers and Principal Financial
Officer of Monster Offers, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”). We are delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter year ended June 30, 2012 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(“Form 10-Q”).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Monster Offers (the “Company”) certifies to his knowledge
that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                               



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Gain                                                      
|Paul Gain                                                          
|Principal Executive Officer
        
        Date: November 6, 2012
|                                                                   
|/s/ Wayne Irving                                                   
|Wayne Irving                                                       
|Principal Executive Officer
        Principal Financial Officer    



Date: November 6, 2012
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2495 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish an exception 

to the penalty on early distributions from qualified plans for individuals 

diagnosed with certain terminal illnesses. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2019 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish 

an exception to the penalty on early distributions from 

qualified plans for individuals diagnosed with certain terminal illnesses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kathryn Manginelli 

5 Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘Compassionate Retirement Act of 

6 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2495 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO PENALTY ON EARLY DISTRIBUTIONS 

2 FROM QUALIFIED PLANS FOR INDIVIDUALS 

3 WITH A TERMINAL ILLNESS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 72(t)(2) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(H) TERMINAL ILLNESS.— 

8 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Distributions 

9 which are made to the employee on or 

10 after the date on which such employee has 

11 been diagnosed with a terminal illness. 

12 ‘‘(ii) DEFINITION.—For purposes of 

13 this subparagraph, the term ‘terminal ill14 ness’ means an illness or physical condi15 tion, as diagnosed by a physician (as de16 fined in section 1861(r)(1) of the Social 

17 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(r)(1))), 

18 which can reasonably be expected to result 

19 in death in 7 years or less after the date 

20 of such diagnosis. 

21 ‘‘(iii) DOCUMENTATION.—For pur22 poses of this subparagraph, an employee 

23 shall not be considered to have been diag24 nosed with a terminal illness described in 

25 clause (i) unless such employee furnishes 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2495 IS

1 sufficient evidence in such form and man2 ner as the Secretary may require.’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 this section shall apply to distributions after the date of 

5 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS