alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62868]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5552]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 22, 2007, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301, et seq. (``the Act''), Semiconductor Test 
Consortium, Inc. has filed written notifications simultaneously with 
the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Tom Jackson (individual member), Merrimack, NH; Wavecrest 
Corporation, Eden Prairie, MN; Keven Fetterly (individual member), 
Rollingbay, WA; and Mark Roos (individual member), Santa Clara, CA have 
been added as parties to this venture. Also, NXP Semiconductors, Inc., 
San Jose, CA; John Rowe (individual member), Boston, MA; Christopher 
Alderson (individual member), Yokohama, JAPAN; Apria Technology, 
Rollingbay, WA; and Roos Instruments, Santa Clara, CA have withdrawn as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. 
intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes 
in membership.
    On May 27, 2003, Semiconductor Test Consortium, Inc. filed its 
original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The 
Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register 
pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on June 17, 2003 (68 FR 35913).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 7, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on July 13, 2007 (72 FR 38619).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-5552 Filed 11-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

VERDELL ROBINSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:09-cv-00357-MP -GRJ

WALTER MCNEIL,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 38, Petitioner’s motion to extend the time

to submit payment to the Clerk for copies of documents and for an extension of time to

reply to the Respondent’s response. Upon due consideration, the motion is GRANTED.

Pursuant to Rule 5(e), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, a habeas Petitioner “may”

submit a reply, but is not required to do so. Because submission of a reply is voluntary,

following the expiration of the extended deadline the Court will consider the merits of

the Petition and the Response on file, consistent with the Court’s usual rule of disposing

of cases in the order in which they are received.

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

That Petitioner shall have until March 7, 2011, to submit payment for the copies

requested by Petitioner and to submit his reply, if any. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 6 day of January 2011. th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
# C_2010283EN.01001301.xml

| 20.10.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 October 2010

2010/C 283/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3859 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4574 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88060 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3350 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,3405 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1690 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 24,520 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 276,89 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7099 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,9363 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2980 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9775 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4159 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4217 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7531 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8491 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8126 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 561,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,6507 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,2089 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3295 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 386,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3081 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,121 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 42,2900 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,452 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3387 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2607 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 61,5430 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3859

JPY

Japanese yen

113,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4574

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88060

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3350

CHF

Swiss franc

1,3405

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1690

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

24,520

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

276,89

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7099

PLN

Polish zloty

3,9363

RON

Romanian leu

4,2980

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9775

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4159

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4217

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7531

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8491

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8126

KRW

South Korean won

1 561,31

ZAR

South African rand

9,6507

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,2089

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3295

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 386,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3081

PHP

Philippine peso

60,121

RUB

Russian rouble

42,2900

THB

Thai baht

41,452

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3387

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2607

INR

Indian rupee

61,5430

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SAMUEL MOTT, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

Case No. 1:09cv178-MP/WCS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner, Social

Security Administration,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Defendant has moved for remand of this action to the Defendant pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc. 18. Plaintiff has filed a response. Doc. 19. 

A sentence four remand is discretionary, but requires that the court enter "a judgment

affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner." The proper option

in this case is to reverse the Commissioner's decision and remand. Melkonyan v.

Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 111 S.Ct. 2157, 115 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991).
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court enter final judgment pursuant

to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure REVERSING the ALJ’s decision as it

pertains to the time period September 22, 2004 thru May 17, 2006, and AFFIRMING the

decision as to Plaintiff’s disability as of May 18, 2006, and REMAND this case to the

Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon remand the ALJ shall

follow the instructions set forth in the Defendant’s Memorandum in Support of his

Motion to Remand for the time period September 22, 2004 thru May 17, 2006.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on July 12, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10

days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections

limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 1:09cv178-MP/WCS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

VERNON ROBINSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:09-cv-00333-SPM-AK

G ARLINE, et al, 

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the filing of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. 

(Doc. 12). From a review of the complaint, it is evident that the facts as presented fail to state a

claim upon which relief can be granted. Further, Plaintiff has not responded truthfully about

prior cases filed in this court which is grounds for dismissal. See Rule 11(c), Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, and Hood v. Tompkins, 197 Fed Appx. 818, 819 (11th Cir. 2006). Plaintiff

claims he is “not sure” about previous lawsuits, but he has filed three other lawsuits in this court: 

4:07cv436-RH/WCS; 4:07cv441-MP/WCS; and 4:05cv282-MP/WCS. None of these cases is so

old that Plaintiff may have forgotten about them.

The Court is also concerned that the claims raised are time barred by the applicable

statute of limitations. Plaintiff complains about actions taken regarding incentive gain time that

resulted in his conditional release in 1996. While he mentions some act on July 21, 2008, it is

unclear what he is referring to except perhaps grievance responses, but the limitations period

runs from the date the facts supporting the cause of action are apparent or would be apparent to a

reasonable person, and when the plaintiff knows or has reason to know of his injury. Mullinax v.
Page 2 of 2

McElhenney, 817 F.2d 711, 716 (11th Cir. 1987) (and cases cited). The statute of limitations for

a claim brought in Florida pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 is four years. Baker v. Gulf & Western

Industries, Inc., 850 F.2d 1480 (1988); Owens v. Okure, 488 U.S. 235, 109 S. Ct. 573, 102 L.

Ed. 2d 594 (1989). Thus, Plaintiff must file a third amended complaint and explain his lack of

truthfulness about the prior cases and provide facts supporting that his cause of action began on

some date other than 1996. He shall do this in five pages or less as he was told to do previously

and use the complaint form and format mailed to him which instructs that he name each

defendant and list beside them his claims against them. 

Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED:

1. The clerk of court shall forward to Plaintiff another Section 1983 form.

2. Plaintiff must respond to this order by April 23, 2010.

3. Failure of Plaintiff to respond to this order may result in the dismissal of his

lawsuit.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of April, 2010. 

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

Case No: 4:09-cv-00333-SPM-AK
EXHIBIT 23.1
KYLE L. TINGLE, CPA
 
    To Whom It May Concern: March 18, 2002
The firm of Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC consents to the inclusion of his report ofMarch 18, 2002 accompanying the audited financial statements of HawksdaleFinancial Visions, Inc., as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the relatedstatements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years thenended, and the period December 6, 1996 (inception) through December 31, 2001,in the Form 10KSB with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Kyle L. Tingle
Kyle L. Tingle, CPA, LLC
          
          
          
          
          
P.O. Box 50141, Henderson, Nevada 89016, Phone: (702) 434-8452, Fax: (702)436-4218, e-mail: Ktingle@worldnet.att.net
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of EXPLORE ANYWHERE HOLIDNG CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Khris Thetsy, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 19, 2012
/s/ Khris ThetsyKhris ThetsyCFO (Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 1 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 2 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 3 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 4 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 5 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 6 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 7 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 8 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 9 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 10 of 11

Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH     Document 1      Filed 04/30/2007     Page 11 of 11
# C_2009291EN.01000702.xml

| 1.12.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5640 — SCF/AIG BANK/AIG Credit)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 291/03

On 20 November 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5640. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5640. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

AMANDA MICHELLE NIX

vs

ROLLING HILLS MANAGEMENT GROUP LLC

et al

Case No. 3:10CV303/MCR/MD

ORDER

Defendant’s “Answer of Defendants Rolling Hills Management Group LLC and South

Palafox Properties LLC,” received on December 7, 2010 was referred to the undersigned

with the following deficiencies:

A corporation is an artificial entity which cannot appear pro se in legal proceedings

but must be represented by counsel. Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381,

1385 (11 Cir. 1985); Rowland v. Cal. Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-03, 113 th

S.Ct. 716, 121 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993). 

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

XX The submitted hard copy of the document shall be returned to you by the

Clerk without electronic filing. It may be resubmitted after the above noted

deficiencies are corrected.

DONE and ORDERED this 8 day of December, 2010. th

/s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00303-MCR -MD Document 11 Filed 12/08/10 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

WILLIAM FIELDS,

 Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 5:10cv16/MCR/MD

STATE OF FLORIDA, et al.,

 Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on February 1, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s federal claims are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

3. Any state law claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of March, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KELLY WHISBY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 5:10cv176/MCR/MD

JOHN DOE I, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated August 22, 2012. (Doc. 16). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No timely

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, the court has

determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to reopen the case and proceed in forma pauperis (doc.

13) is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of October, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00176-MCR-MD Document 17 Filed 10/05/12 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-15023-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:09CR87 LAC

HENRY RICHARD HALE

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on August 31, 2009 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION TO UNSEAL INDICTMENT 

Filed by GOVERNMENT on 8/31/09 Doc.# 8

RESPONSES:

 on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 31 day of

st

August, 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is GRANTED.

(b)

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Document No.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-40143

Conference Calendar

__________________

KEVIN G. OWENS,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

R. STANLEY ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-611

- - - - - - - - - -

June 27, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The dismissal of the civil rights complaint filed by Texas

prisoner Kevin G. Owens, # 584509, is AFFIRMED. Owens's

disagreement with the medical treatment he received does not

establish a violation of his constitutional rights. Varnado v.

Lynaugh, 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). 
No. 96-40143

-2-

Owens has filed in this court a "Motion to Amend Original

Complaint" which we DISMISS FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. See FED.

R. CIV. P. 15. 

AFFIRMED.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                       |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                       |   |
|   |        /s/ Jeffrey H. Coats           |   |
|   | Jeffrey      H. Coats                      |   |
|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   | March      4, 2010                         |   |

|   |                                                       |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                       |   |
|   |        /s/ Curtis E. DeWalt                           |   |
|   | Curtis      E. DeWalt                                      |   |
|   | Senior      Vice President andChief      Financial Officer |   |
|   | March      4, 2010                                         |   |
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 4 to the
Registration Statement, No. 333-102800, of Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited on
Form F-3 of our report dated November 29, 2004 with respect to the consolidated
balance sheet of Durban Roodepoort Deep, Limited and its subsidiaries as of June
30, 2004 and June 30, 2003 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity, cash flows and notes thereto for the years
then ended, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Durban
Roodepoort Deep, Limited for the year ended June 30, 2004.

/s/ Johan Holtzhausen                             /s/ Carel Smit
Johan Holtzhausen                                 Carel Smit
Director: Energy and Natural Resources            Managing Director: Energy
                                                  and Natural Resources

KPMG Inc

Registered Accountants and Auditors

Chartered Accountants (SA)

Johannesburg, South Africa

December 3, 2004
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CECIL MCRAY, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10cv196-SPM/GRJ

A GRAVES, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated April 22, 2011 (doc. 11). Plaintiff has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and

recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should

be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 11) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with

Case 1:10-cv-00196-SPM-GRJ Document 13 Filed 05/24/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

an order of the Court and for failure to prosecute.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of May, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 1:10cv196-SPM/GRJ

Case 1:10-cv-00196-SPM-GRJ Document 13 Filed 05/24/11 Page 2 of 2