alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc Casavant,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Marc Casavant
Marc Casavant, CFO, Director
Date: April 13, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB soley
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section  1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
# National Family Week, 2007

As families gather together to celebrate Thanksgiving, we underscore the comforting and positive role they play in our society. During National Family Week, we celebrate the contributions of families everywhere.

Families strengthen our communities by teaching important values such as compassion and honesty to their children. Families also offer a supportive environment and help ensure that children grow into responsible members of society. By providing guidance and unconditional love, parents shape the character of their children.

My Administration believes that the strength of our Nation is built upon the foundation of strong families. To help support families, we have doubled the child tax credit, reduced the marriage penalty, and lowered tax rates. We are also committed to promoting positive youth development. The Helping America's Youth initiative, led by First Lady Laura Bush, supports organizations, including faith-based and community groups, that continue this important mission.

All Americans are grateful to our Nation's military families, who have stood by their loved ones in times of war and peace. Our country will always be especially thankful for the sacrifices of our military personnel and for their devotion to duty and their love of country. During National Family Week, we pray for their safe return and for the families who await them at home.

                        NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 18 through November 24, 2007, as National Family Week. I invite the States, communities, and all the people of the United States to join together in observing this week with appropriate ceremonies and activities to honor our Nation's families.                              ( print page 65652)    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this sixteenth day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second.

[FR Doc. 07-5815

Billing code 3195-01-P
Exhibit 10.7


 


Amendment No. 5 to the


MYOS Corporation 2012 Equity Incentive Plan


 


WHEREAS, MYOS Corporation
(the “Company”) has established the MYOS Corporation 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, effective September 24, 2012 (as amended,
the “Plan”);


 


WHEREAS, the Company's
Board of Directors (the “Board”) has the authority pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Plan to amend the Plan subject
to the approval of holders of the Company's common stock (“Common Stock”), $0.001 par value per share (the “Stockholders”)
entitled to vote in accordance with applicable law;


 


WHEREAS, the Board desires
to amend the Plan to increase the aggregate number of shares of the Company's Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan (“Amendment
No. 5”); and


 


WHEREAS, on November
7, 2019, the Board determined to approve Amendment No. 4 and recommend its approval to the Stockholders;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant
to the power of amendment set forth in the Plan and Stockholders approval per proxy vote, the Plan is hereby amended as follows
effective December 23, 2019:


 


1.    The reference to “850,000
shares” in the first sentence of paragraph (b) of Section 5 of the Plan is replaced in its entirety with “1,200,000
shares”.


 


2.     Except as hereinabove
amended and modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.     A majority in
voting interest of the stockholders present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the meeting of stockholders at which
this Amendment No. 5 to the Plan was considered, has duly approved this Amendment No. 5 to the Plan.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 5 to the Plan is made effective this 23rd day of December, 2019.


 


	 	MYOS RENS TECHNOLGY, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Joseph Mannello
	 	 	Name: Joseph Mannello
	 	 	Title: CEO
- Text189: 
    - Text190: 
    - Text191: 
    - Text192: 
    - Text193: 
    - Text194: 
    - Text195:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                  ------------



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Ronald J. Kanterman, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.






Date: June 25, 2008                         /s/ Ronald J. Kanterman
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                               Ronald J. Kanterman
                                    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand down an opinion but 1

is not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).

NUMBER 13-08-213-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE ADOLFO CORTINAS

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relator, Adolfo Cortinas, pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above

cause on April 16, 2008. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for

writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief

sought. The petition generally fails to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3

and fails to establish that the district court: (1) had a legal duty to perform a
2

nondiscretionary act, (2) was asked to perform the act, and (3) failed or refused to do so.

See In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this 22nd day of April, 2008.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BRICE BUILDING COMPANY, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv31/RS-MD

SUANN LEE and GLENDA E. LEE,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Plaintiff Brice Building Company, Inc.’s Motion To Reconsider (Doc. 12) is denied. 

Plaintiff shall file a response to Defendants’ Motion For Sanctions (Doc. 11) not later than

May 4, 2010.

ORDERED on April 27, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANGELA ROSARIO-SANTOS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-3142

[July 12, 2017]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Cynthia L. Cox, Judge; L.T. Case No. 31-2015-CF000298B.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Gary Lee Caldwell, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

GROSS, J.

Angela Rosario-Santos appeals her conviction and sentence for first 

degree petit theft. Because the state failed to adequately prove the stolen 

property was valued at $100 or more, we reverse and remand for the entry 

of a judgment of guilt for second degree petit theft. 

At trial, the Walmart security guard who apprehended appellant 

testified that he observed appellant and another woman leave the store 

with a shopping cart full of some paid-for items and some unpaid-for 

items. The security guard did not testify to the value of the stolen items. 

The police officer who responded to Walmart took several photos of the 

items in the shopping cart, which were admitted into evidence. One photo 

shows assorted meats, but no price tags. The officer did not testify to 

value.

In response to appellant’s motion for judgment of acquittal based on 

the state’s failure to establish value, the prosecutor asserted that some of 

the prices in the meat photo “may add up to over $100,” but admitted she 
- 2 -

did not get a chance to “really look that closely” at the photo. During 

closing argument, the prosecutor conceded that the state did not “have an 

exact value” of the unpaid-for items, but told the jury to use their common 

sense. 

“A conviction for first-degree petit theft requires competent substantial 

evidence showing that the defendant stole property with a ‘value’ at the 

time of the theft between $100 and $300.” Sanchez v. State, 101 So. 3d 

1283, 1286 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (citing § 812.014(2)(e), Fla. Stat. (2010)). 

“Where the state fails to prove that the stolen property is worth at least 

$100, a conviction for first degree petit theft must be reduced to second 

degree petit theft.” Ortiz v. State, 36 So. 3d 901, 902 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). 

Here, the state provided no evidence of the value of the stolen items. It 

is theoretically possible that the fair market value of an item could be 

determined to exceed $100 on common sense alone, for instance, if the 

item was a classic Picasso painting. That fact pattern is not present in 

this case. A photo of assorted meats, without more, is not competent 

evidence of value to support a conviction of first degree petit theft. 

We reverse the conviction and sentence for first degree petit theft and 

remand for the entry of a judgment of conviction and sentence for second 

degree petit theft. 

Reversed and remanded. 

GERBER, C.J., and KUNTZ, J., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

LAMAR PLAYER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00105-MP -GRJ

SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 18, Respondent’s motion for an

extension of time to respond to the Petition. Upon due consideration, the motion is

GRANTED, and it is ORDERED:

1. Respondent shall file a response to the Petition on or before April 22, 2011. 

2. Petitioner shall have until May 23, 2011, to file a reply, if desired.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18 day of February 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PETER HERNANDEZ,

Petitioner,

v. 3:10cv109-WS

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE

PROGRAMS, JUSTICE STATISTICS

DIVISION,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

February 2, 2011. See Doc. 22. The magistrate judge recommends that the

respondent's "Motion to Strike and Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary

Judgment" (doc. 13) be GRANTED. The petitioner has filed objections (doc. 23) to the

report and recommendation.

Having carefully considered the report and recommendation in light of the

petitioner's objections, this court has determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:
Page 2 of 2

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is ADOPTED and

incorporated by reference into this order of the court. 

2. The respondent's "Motion to Strike and Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion

for Summary Judgment" (doc. 13) is GRANTED. 

3. The petitioner's "Motion to Strike Defense as Insufficient and for Summary

Judgment (doc. 18) is DENIED.

4. The clerk shall enter judgment in the respondent's favor.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of February , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PERSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of FOREVER VALUABLE COLLECTIBLES, INC. (the Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012 herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jodi K. Stevens, President, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that, to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: November 15, 2012By:/s/ Jodi K. StevensJodi K. StevensPresident, Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1830** 

YOHANNES BEKELE KORCHA; YETIMWORK LEMMA KABTYIMER , Petitioners ,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : March 15, 2012 Decided: April 6, 2012

Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Alan M. Parra, LAW OFFICES OF ALAN M. PARRA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioners. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Holly M. Smith, Senior Litigation Counsel, Joseph D. Hardy, U NITED S TATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Office of Immigration Litigation , Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Yohannes Bekele Korcha and Yetimwork Lemma Kabtyimer, both natives and citizens of Ethiopia, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of Korcha’s applications for relief from removal. Petitioners challenge the determination that the lead applicant, Korcha, failed to establish eligibility for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v. Elias

- Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483

- 84 (1992 ). We have reviewed the evidence of record and Petitioners’ contentions on appeal and conclude that the agency’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. Petitioners thus fail to show that the evidence compels a contrary result. Having failed to q ualify for asylum, Korcha cannot meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. Chen v. INS , 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999); INS v. Cardoza

- Fonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### COZART v. CHAPIN

No. 53 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 254.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1978.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2504 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2504

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to veterans with 
       traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2019

Mr. Hoeven (for himself and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to veterans with 
       traumatic brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TBI and PTSD Treatment Act''.

SEC. 2. HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY FOR VETERANS WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN 
              INJURY OR POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 17 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1710E the following 
new section:
``Sec. 1710F. Traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress 
              disorder: hyperbaric oxygen therapy
    ``(a) Authority.--The Secretary shall furnish hyperbaric oxygen 
therapy to a veteran who has a condition specified in subsection (b) 
through a health care provider described in section 1703(c)(5) of this 
title.
    ``(b) Covered Conditions.--The conditions specified in this 
subsection are the following:
            ``(1) Traumatic brain injury.
            ``(2) Post-traumatic stress disorder.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
subchapter II of chapter 17 of such title is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 1710E the following new item:

``1710F. Traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder: 
                            hyperbaric oxygen therapy.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JEMAL SHELTON, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cv334-SPM/WCS

MCDONALD’S CORPORATION,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case has been dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the parties’

Stipulation of Dismissal (doc. 13) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, the clerk shall close this case.

SO ORDERED this 15th day of September, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2464 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district 

courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2019 

Mr. COTTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority 

of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nationwide Injunction 

5 Abuse Prevention Act of 2019’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2464 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY OF UNITED STATES 

2 DISTRICT COURTS TO PROVIDE INJUNCTIVE 

3 RELIEF. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 85 of title 28, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘§ 1370. Limitation on authority to provide injunctive 

8 relief 

9 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no dis10 trict court may issue any order providing injunctive relief 

11 unless the order is applicable only to— 

12 ‘‘(1) the parties to the case before the district 

13 court; or 

14 ‘‘(2) the judicial district in which the order is 

15 issued.’’. 

16 (b) TABLE OF SECTIONS.—The table of sections for 

17 chapter 84 of title 28, United States Code, is amended 

18 by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘1370. Limitation on authority to provide injunctive relief.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS