alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009213EN.01000401.xml

| 8.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 September 2009

2009/C 213/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4330 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4435 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87350 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1955 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5181 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5850 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,488 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,24 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7020 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1100 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2463 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1374 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6748 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5429 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,1064 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0696 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0536 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 768,23 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,8700 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7860 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3365 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 417,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0370 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,677 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,1005 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,784 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6419 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,1843 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,7300 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4330

JPY

Japanese yen

133,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4435

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87350

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1955

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5181

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5850

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,488

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,24

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7020

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1100

RON

Romanian leu

4,2463

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1374

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6748

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5429

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,1064

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0696

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0536

KRW

South Korean won

1 768,23

ZAR

South African rand

10,8700

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7860

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3365

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 417,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0370

PHP

Philippine peso

69,677

RUB

Russian rouble

45,1005

THB

Thai baht

48,784

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6419

MXN

Mexican peso

19,1843

INR

Indian rupee

69,7300

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2009162EN.01001001.xml

| 15.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/10

---

Special Report No 5/2009 ‘The Commission’s Treasury Management’

2009/C 162/06

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 5/2009 ‘The Commission’s Treasury Management’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MICHAEL D. CORN

Inmate #947796,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv341/MCR/MD

WALTER A. McNEIL, Secretary of the

Florida Department of Corrections, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on September 20, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after

reviewing objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is

adopted as the opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This cause is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee Division, and the clerk is directed to close

this file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ABDUL KHALIQ ALANSARI,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv106-SPM/WCS

CASH COW, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, initiated this case on March 18, 2010, doc. 1, and

then filed an amended complaint, doc. 4, on April 19, 2010. Service was directed in

May, 2010, doc. 8, and as of September 29, 2010, the court docket reflected that

service had still not been carried out. Plaintiff had already been granted a continuance,

docs. 10-12, and the United States Marshals Service was appointed to serve the

complaint, doc. 12. Plaintiff then filed another motion requesting extension of the 120-

day deadline. Doc. 14. The motion for an enlargement of time was granted in part,

extending the time to allow the Marshals Service to serve the complaint. Doc. 15. That

order, entered on August 30, 2010, doc. 15, provided that service must be carried out
Page 2 of 3

on or before September 20, 2010. Id. When nothing was filed by that deadline, I

entered a report and recommendation for dismissal. Doc. 18.

On October 5, 2010, an Answer was field by Defendant Cash Cow. Doc. 19. 

Thereafter, on October 15, 2010, Plaintiff filed a motion to dismiss, doc. 20, which is

construed as a notice of voluntary dismissal. That notice does not contain a certificate

of service. 

Under Rule 41(a), a Plaintiff may dismiss a case without a court order if the

notice is filed "before the opposing party serves either an answer of motion for summary

judgment." FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Defendant had filed an answer ten days

before Plaintiff's notice was filed and, thus, a court order is required.

Defendant has not pleaded a counter-claim in the Answer, doc. 19, and it will be

assumed that Defendant has no objection to dismissal of this action. Indeed, there

would appear to no longer be a case or controversy between the parties. Therefore, it

is recommended that this action be dismissed upon Plaintiff's notice, doc. 20. If

Defendant objects to dismissal, a motion for reconsideration to this report and

recommendation should be filed within the period for objections.

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's

amended complaint, doc. 5, be DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Plaintiff's

notice of voluntary dismissal, doc. 20. 

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on October 19, 2010.

 s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 4:10cv106-SPM/WCS
Page 3 of 3

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv106-SPM/WCS
# CE2013168EN.01014202.xml

| 14.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 168/142 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 168/142

---

Tuesday 13 December 2011Nomination of a member of the Court of Auditors (Mr J-F. Corona Ramón - ES)

P7_TA(2011)0554

European Parliament decision of 13 December 2011 on the nomination of Juan-Francisco Corona Ramón as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C7-0343/2011 – 2011/0808(NLE))

2013/C 168 E/28

(Consultation)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0343/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0343/2011),

| — | having regard to the fact that at its meeting of 23 November 2011 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the fact that at its meeting of 23 November 2011 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors,

| — | having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0422/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0422/2011),

| A. | whereas Juan-Francisco Corona Ramón fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Juan-Francisco Corona Ramón fulfils the conditions laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU;

| 1. | Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council's nomination of Juan-Francisco Corona Ramón as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council's nomination of Juan-Francisco Corona Ramón as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
#### OSBORNE v. TOWN OF NORTH WILKESBORO

No. 62.

Eeported: 280 N.C. 696.

Petition by Town of North Wilkesboro to rehear denied 15 June 1972.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

BRUCE RICH,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00157-MP -AK

JEFFERY ANDREWS, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Comply

with Order. (Doc. 5). Having considered said motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should

be GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall have through September 17, 2010, to comply with the Court’s

previous Order directing the submission of inmate account information. (See Doc. 4). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel

PATRICIA McCULLOUGH,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:10cv126-SPM

ONA COLASANTE, M.D.,

Defendant.

 

 

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court on the United States’ Motion for a

Stay of the Civil Proceedings (doc. 17). The United States has requested a 60

day stay of the proceedings in order to not interfere with a related criminal

investigation. The United States has also requested that all pleadings continue

to be sealed during the same time period. The Court having determined, based

on the United States’ unopposed motion to stay the proceedings and to continue

the seal on the pleadings, that good cause exists, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as

follows: 

1) The United States’ Motion for a Stay of the Civil Proceedings (doc.

Case 1:10-cv-00126-MW-GRJ Document 19 Filed 12/19/11 Page 1 of 2
17) is granted. The proceedings are hereby stayed for 60 days

from the date of this Order.

2) During this period, all filings in this action, including the relator’s

complaint, shall remain UNDER SEAL unless otherwise ordered by

this Court. 

4) The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this order to both the

government and the relator. 

SO ORDERED this 19th day of December, 2011.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

2

Case 1:10-cv-00126-MW-GRJ Document 19 Filed 12/19/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Reportof Mill City Ventures III, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas M. Polinsky, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, and I, Joseph A. Geraci, II, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

 

2.       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 

	/s/ Douglas M. Polinsky	

Douglas M. Polinsky

Chief Executive Officer

 

May 11, 2018

 

 

	/s/ Joseph A. Geraci, II	

Joseph A. Geraci, II

Chief Financial Officer

 

May 11, 2018
Exhibit 10(c)



                                    AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This  Amendment to Employment Agreement is entered into effective as of
the 28th day of February, 2003, by and between TXU Corp., a Texas  corporation
(the "Company"),  and Michael J. McNally,  an individual ("Employee")

         WHEREAS,  the Company and Employee entered into that certain Employment
Agreement dated as of July 1, 2000,  as amended pursuant to that certain
Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of May 11, 2001("Employment
Agreement); and

         WHEREAS,  the parties now desire to amend the Employment Agreement to
extend the Term thereof such that the Term shall expire on the third anniversary
of the effective date of this Amendment to Employment Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements set forth
herein and in the Employment Agreement and for other good and valuable
consideration,  the  receipt and  sufficiency  of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties hereby agree as follows:

         1.       Extension  of Term.  Section 2 of the  Employment Agreement
                  is hereby  amended by replacing the date "June 30, 2004" with
                  the date "the third anniversary of the effective date of the
                  Amendment to Employment Agreement dated in February  2003,"
                  and, as amended,  said Section 2 shall be and read in full as
                  follows:

                            "2.  Term:  This Employment Agreement shall commence
                            as of the date first set forth above and, unless
                            terminated earlier pursuant to the provisions
                            hereof, shall expire on the third anniversary of the
                            effective date of the Amendment to Employment
                            Agreement dated in February 2003 ("Term:).

         2.       Continued  Effectiveness of Employment  Agreement.  Except as
                  expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall
                  remain in full force and effect.

         3.       Governing  Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and
                  construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas.

         Executed effective as of the 28th day of February, 2003.

TXU CORP.                                        EMPLOYEE:



By:/s/ Erle Nye                                   /s/ Michael J. McNally
-------------------------------                  ------------------------------
Erle Nye, Chairman of the Board                  Michael J. McNally
and Chief Executive

                                                                     Solo Page
#### HALL v. RAILROAD CO.

No. 16 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 295.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 March 1980.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RANDOLPH BAGGETT,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv347/LAC/EMT

COLONEL SCHWARTZ, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated September 16, 2010 (Doc. 15). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss(Doc. 14) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED 

without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18 day of October, 2010. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2010191EN.01002501.xml

| 15.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/25

---

Corrigendum to the Council Decision of 19 April 2010 appointing the Italian members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 110 of 29 April 2010
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 110 of 29 April 2010

2010/C 191/12

In the title of the Decision on the cover page and in the title and concluding formula on page 2:

for:

‘19 April 2010’,

read:

‘26 April 2010’;

On page 2, signature:

for:

‘E. SALGADO’,

read:

‘M. Á. MORATINOS’.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Jeff Ritchie, certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Independent Film Development Corporation;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: | March 19, 2008 | 
|----- | -------------- | 



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Jeff Ritchie                     
|Jeff Ritchie                         
|Chief Executive Officer, and Director
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 29, 2018

No. 04-17-00801-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.A.E., ET AL CHILDREN,

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016PA02691

Honorable Gloria Saldana, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellee’s motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is 

extended to April 16, 2018.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court