alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009286EN.01000201.xml

| 27.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 November 2009

2009/C 286/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,5071 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,70 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4418 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,91100 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4548 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5098 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5000 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,188 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,77 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7089 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1245 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2785 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2797 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6436 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5882 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,6802 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0987 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0827 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 742,13 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2328 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2882 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3240 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 233,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,1068 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,548 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,8310 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,971 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6132 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,4200 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,9970 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,5071

JPY

Japanese yen

130,70

DKK

Danish krone

7,4418

GBP

Pound sterling

0,91100

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4548

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5098

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5000

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,188

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,77

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7089

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1245

RON

Romanian leu

4,2785

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2797

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6436

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5882

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,6802

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0987

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0827

KRW

South Korean won

1 742,13

ZAR

South African rand

11,2328

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2882

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3240

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 233,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,1068

PHP

Philippine peso

70,548

RUB

Russian rouble

43,8310

THB

Thai baht

49,971

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6132

MXN

Mexican peso

19,4200

INR

Indian rupee

69,9970

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

I, John Bristow, Chief Executive Officer of Rockwell Diamonds
Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of
the Company for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2009 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| | By:    | /s/ J.
      Bristow   
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | John Bristow           
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| | Date:  | August 30, 2010        

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
Exhibit 32.1 - Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Monster
Offers, a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul Gain
-------------------------------
    Paul Gain
    Principal Executive Officer
    Principal Financial Officer


Date  November 22, 2010
      -----------------


<PAGE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 9, 2016

No. 04-15-00807-CR

Mark Allen WATSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-2380-CR-B

The Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief is due on September 1, 2016. No further extensions will be granted.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of August, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit
13.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of CityView Corporation Limited (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, P M Smyth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.










P M
Smyth


June 27,
2008
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10-CR-46-SPM/WCS-2

CHRISTY JEAN BAILOR,

 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation (doc. 40) of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of

the Defendant, Christy Jean Bailor, to Count One of the Indictment is hereby

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this twentieth day of October, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BRIAN SHAWN SAUDER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv230-SPM/WCS

SERGEANT GREEN, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated July 25, 2011. Doc. 39. The parties have been

furnished with copies and Defendants Green and Pate filed objections pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Doc. 11. Despite the

objections, I have determined that the report and recommendation is correct and

should be adopted. Plaintiff has stated enough plausible facts to support a claim

that the threat of retaliation made administrative remedies unavailable to him. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 39) is

Case 4:10-cv-00230-SPM-WCS Document 42 Filed 08/16/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 31) is denied in part and

granted in part. Plaintiff’s claim for relief is limited to nominal damages against

Defendants in their individual capacities.

3. This case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of August, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:10cv230-SPMWCS

Case 4:10-cv-00230-SPM-WCS Document 42 Filed 08/16/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SUE ANN ALEXANDER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00125-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion To Remand. (Doc. 15.)

Defendant requests the Court to remand this case to the Commissioner for further

proceedings. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(B), counsel for Defendant represents that he

has conferred with counsel for Plaintiff and Plaintiff does not object to the relief

requested.

Defendant has moved to remand this matter (Doc. 15) to the Commissioner

under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) which provides that:

The court shall have power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of

the record, a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the decision of

the Commissioner of Social Security, with or without remanding the cause

for a rehearing. 

The Commissioner advises that agency counsel requested the Appeals Council

of the Social Security Administration to reconsider the Commissioner’s decision. After

reviewing the Commissioner’s decision the Appeals Council determined that remand

was appropriate for further consideration of Plaintiff’s claim. 
Page 2 of 2

It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Defendant’s Motion To Remand (Doc.

15) be GRANTED, and that this action be REVERSED and REMANDED pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner. On remand the

administrative law judge should obtain psychological testing regarding Plaintiff’s level of

intellectual functioning and to further evaluate Plaintiff’s mental functioning under Listing

12.05(B). It is also RECOMMENDED that the Clerk be directed to enter final judgment

accordingly, terminate any pending motions, and close the file.

At Gainesville, Florida, this 15 day of December 2010.

th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), a party may file specific, written

objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 14 days after

being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may

respond to another party’s objections within 14 days after being served with a

copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No: 1:10-cv-00125-MP -GRJ
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION








I, Jesus
Diaz, CFO, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Abazias, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and





5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.














Date:
March 31, 2008





/s/ Jesus
Diaz


Jesus
Diaz


CEO and
CFO
# C_2009236EN.01000201.xml

| 1.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 September 2009

2009/C 236/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4643 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4443 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2320 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5078 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,164 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7079 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2295 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2180 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1734 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6596 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5709 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3485 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0287 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0654 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 723,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 10,8984 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,9958 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2580 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 130,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0679 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,318 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,9800 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,988 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6050 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7454 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,0010 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4643

JPY

Japanese yen

131,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4443

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90930

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2320

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5078

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,164

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7079

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2295

RON

Romanian leu

4,2180

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1734

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6596

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5709

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3485

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0287

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0654

KRW

South Korean won

1 723,95

ZAR

South African rand

10,8984

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,9958

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2580

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 130,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0679

PHP

Philippine peso

69,318

RUB

Russian rouble

43,9800

THB

Thai baht

48,988

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6050

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7454

INR

Indian rupee

70,0010

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LOAISA RODRIGUEZ,

Petitioner,

v. 4:10cv217-WS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

 

ORDER DIRECTING TRANSFER OF CASE

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

July 21, 2010. See Doc. 6. The magistrate judge recommends that the action be

transferred to the Southern District of Florida.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 6) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The clerk shall TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, for all further proceedings.
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of August , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
alo-ex49_46.htm



 

EXHIBIT 4.9

 



 

 

 

Consent of Qualified Person 

 

 

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Form 20-F”) of Alio Gold Inc., I, Ing. Alan J. San Martin, MAusIMM (CP), hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the references to the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 F1 Technical Report Updated Resources and Reserves and Mine Plan for the San Francisco Gold Project, Sonora, Mexico”, dated May 25, 2017 with an effective date of April 1, 2017 (collectively, the “Technical Information”) and to the incorporation by reference of references to, and summaries of, the Technical Information in the Form 20-F.



“Alan J. San Martin” 
Signature of Qualified Person

 

Ing. Alan J. San Martin, MAusIMM (CP),
Name of Qualified Person

 

Mineral Resource Modeller
Title of Qualified Person

 

 

Dated this 14th day of April, 2020

 

900 – 390 BAY STREET, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 2Y2

Telephone +1 416 362 5135   Fax +1 416 362 5763
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JACKIE MICHAEL BELL,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00176-MP-AK

LISA ECHEVERRI, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS,

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 7, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, recommending that the Amended Complaint be dismissed for lack of subject matter

jurisdiction. The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. The Court

agrees that the Amended Complaint should be dismissed.

Plaintiff argues that Florida's child support debt collection system is criminal in nature

but governed by civil procedure. Even after the Magistrate Judge revealed the deficiencies of the

original complaint and gave Plaintiff the chance to amend the complaint, Plaintiff fails to allege

how this violates any right guaranteed by federal statutory or constitutional law. Accordingly, it

is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. This case is dismissed and the Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of February, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
```
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-117690 and 333-110309 and) and on Form S-3
(Nos. 333-122217, 333-119667, 333-118117, 333-111160, 333-109481, 333-106074,
and 333-97913) of Eagle Broadband, Inc., of our report dated November 18, 2005,
relating to the financial statements, which appear in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.

/s/ Lopez, Blevins, Bork & Associates, LLP

Lopez, Blevins, Bork & Associates, LLP
Houston, Texas

November 29, 2005
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. Case Nos.: 3:10cr80/RV/EMT

 3:13cv471/RV/EMT

ROGELIO MUNOZ-MORALES

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s

Report and Recommendation dated July 11, 2016 (ECF No. 73). The parties have

been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded

an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (ECF No. 47) is

GRANTED as to Ground One, but only to the extent that Defendant should be

granted a new sentencing hearing at which the issue of whether he is a career offender

Case 3:10-cr-00080-RV-EMT Document 74 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 should be considered anew. Within twenty-one (21) days

from the date of this order, the U.S. Probation Office shall prepare a supplemental

addendum to the Presentence Investigation Report including amended guidelines

calculations, and provide same to the parties and the court. The entire PSR, including

the supplemental addendum, shall be docketed under seal in this case. The parties

shall have fourteen (14) days to notify the court and the Probation Office of any

objections to the revised calculations. 

3. The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (ECF No. 47) is

DENIED as to Grounds Two and Three and that a certificate of appealability as to

these claims is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of August, 2016.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:10cv80/RV/EMT; 3:13cv471/RV/EMT

Case 3:10-cr-00080-RV-EMT Document 74 Filed 08/17/16 Page 2 of 2