alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CASE NO.: 1:10-cv-00181-SPM-GRJ

SILVIO L. CORONADO, )

)

)

Plaintiff, )

v. )

)

ADVANCED TURBINE SUPPORT, INC., )

RODNEY SHIDLER and RICHARD )

GINDER, )

)

Defendants. )

_________________________________________ )

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SCHEDULING ORDER

Plaintiff, SILVIO L. CORONADO (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), by and through the 

undersigned counsel, responds to Defendants’ Motion for Scheduling Order as follows:

1. On August 5, 2010, Plaintiff commenced this action, Case No. 10-CA-4354, by 

filing a Complaint for unpaid wages and for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 

U.S.C. § 201, in the Circuit Court, Eighth Judicial Circuit, in and for Alachua County, Florida.

2. Plaintiff served discovery on the Defendants with the complaint.

3. Rather than responding to Plaintiff’s discovery to facilitate early resolution of this 

matter, on or about September 9, 2010, Defendants removed this action to this Court.

4. On September 28, 2010, Defendants filed the Motion for Scheduling Order 

requesting, inter alia, that the Court stay discovery and that the Court enter an order requiring

Plaintiff to “answer the Court’s Interrogatories under oath identifying the hours of work, rate of 

pay and wages paid, including overtime pay under oath”.

5. Defendants’ actions, including the removal of the case to this Court and the filing 

of a motion to stay discovery, serve to delay resolution of this action and are inconsistent with 

the just, speedy and economical administration of justice.

Case 1:10-cv-00181-GRJ Document 12 Filed 10/19/10 Page 1 of 2
6. Accordingly, Plaintiff opposes Defendants’ motion insofar as Defendant is 

attempting to have this Court require Plaintiff to respond to the Court’s interrogatories without 

Defendants’ times sheets (many of which Plaintiff has) evidencing the hours worked by Plaintiff.

7. Moreover, to properly determine the hours worked by Plaintiff and amounts to 

Plaintiff, Plaintiff requires responses to the discovery propounded on Defendants over two 

months ago.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on October 18, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing 

document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document 

is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached 

service list in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing 

generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are 

not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

By: /s/ Jose Antonio Llerena

Jose Antonio LLerena, Esq. 

FL Bar No. 0027243

SERVICE LIST

PAUL A. DONNELLY, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 813613

pdonnelly@laborattorneys.org

JUNG YOON, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 599611

jyoon@laborattorneys.org

DONNELLY & GROSS, P.A.

2421 NW 41st Street, Suite A-1

Gainesville, FL 32606

Telephone: (352) 374-4001

Facsimile: (352) 374-4046

Counsel for Defendants

Case 1:10-cv-00181-GRJ Document 12 Filed 10/19/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 7



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CanAlaska Uranium Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20F for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter Dasler, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Company.









Peter Dasler

Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DYLAN HENDRIEX, II,

Petitioner, 

vs. Case No. 3:09cv345/LAC/CJK

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent

________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated March 26, 2012. (Doc. 27). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation,I have determined that the

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 10), challenging

petitioner’s conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Dylan Eddie Hendriex, II

in the Circuit Court for Escambia County, Florida, Case No. 04-CF-282 is DENIED,

and the clerk is directed to close the file.

Case 3:09-cv-00345-LC-CJK Document 28 Filed 05/03/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3 day of May, 2012.

rd

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:09cv345LAC/CJK

Case 3:09-cv-00345-LC-CJK Document 28 Filed 05/03/12 Page 2 of 2
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5235 

To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to ensure that 

politically derived information is not used in an application to the Foreign 

Intelligence Surveillance Court for an order under title I or III of 

such Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 8, 2018 

Mr. TURNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 

to ensure that politically derived information is not used 

in an application to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance 

Court for an order under title I or III of such Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5235 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF POLITICALLY DE2 RIVED INFORMATION IN APPLICATIONS FOR 

3 CERTAIN ORDERS BY THE FOREIGN INTEL4 LIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT. 

5 (a) TITLE I ORDERS.—Section 104(a)(6) of the For6 eign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 

7 1804) is amended— 

8 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

9 and inserting a semicolon; 

10 (2) in subparagraph (E)(ii), by striking the 

11 semicolon and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by adding after subparagraph (E) the fol13 lowing new subparagraph: 

14 ‘‘(F) that none of the facts or cir15 cumstances included in the statement de16 scribed in paragraph (3) were solely pro17 duced by, derived from, or collected using 

18 funds of, a political organization (as de19 fined in section 527 of the Internal Rev20 enue Code of 1986) for the purpose of 

21 gaining an advantage against, or otherwise 

22 conducting research on, an opposing polit23 ical candidate.’’. 

24 (b) TITLE III ORDERS.—Section 303(a)(6) of the 

25 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 

26 1823) is amended— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 5235 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

2 and inserting a semicolon; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (E), by striking the semi4 colon and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding after subparagraph (E) the fol6 lowing new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(F) that none of the facts or cir8 cumstances included in the statement de9 scribed in paragraph (3) were solely pro10 duced by, derived from, or collected using 

11 funds of, a political organization (as de12 fined in section 527 of the Internal Rev13 enue Code of 1986) for the purpose of 

14 gaining an advantage against, or otherwise 

15 conducting research on, an opposing polit16 ical candidate.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
#### Lewis N. BRANCH, Individually and d/b/a Dream Shell Homes, Bankrupt-Appellant, v. MILLS & LUPTON SUPPLY COMPANY, Objecting Creditor, Appellee.

No. 16095.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

July 21, 1965.

James S. Hyde, Jr., of Wilkerson & Hyde, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellant.

W. B. Luther, Chattanooga, Tenn. (Cunningham, Crutchfield & Luther, Chattanooga, Tenn., on the brief), for ap-pellee.

Before O’SULLIVAN and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, Senior District Judge.*

*

 William C. Mathes, Senior District Judge, Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

The bankrupt, who was engaged in the business of building shell homes, admitted that he furnished false affidavits for the purpose of obtaining a loan. One of the creditors filed specifications of objections to his discharge.

The referee in bankruptcy sustained the objections to the discharge in a memorandum opinion containing findings of fact and conclusions of law, saying:

> “One of the objects of the Act is to release an honest and insolvent person from his debts. From this evidence it does not appear that this bankrupt was honest in his dealings with his creditors and the public. While he claims that it was a recognized practice of the trade and that he had made this same affidavit in many other cases, that does not cure the fact that he swore falsely to a material fact for the purpose of obtaining a loan. The giving of an oath, either written or oral, should be treated as sacred. This bankrupt’s act of swearing falsely for the purpose of obtaining a loan is not indicative of such honesty as Congress intended to protect.

> ******

> “I find as a fact that the bankrupt swore falsely, or made a false statement in writing, to material fact for the purpose of obtaining credit or property from Family Pride Homes, Inc., in Atlanta, Georgia, and that he knew at the time these statements were made they were false. I further find that Family Pride Homes, Inc., to whom the statements were *992made, relied upon them in extending the credit.”

On petition to review, District Judge Frank W.. Wilson held the findings of the referee to be correct in all respects, in a comprehensive opinion reported at 242 F.Supp. 534.

We find that the pertinent facts and applicable law are correctly set forth in the opinion of the district court. Concurrent findings of fact by a referee and a district judge will not be set aside on appeal “on anything less than demonstration of plain mistake.” In re Berman & Company, Bankrupt, 343 F.2d 125, 126 (C.A. 6); In re D. I. A. Sales Corporation, 339 F.2d 175, 178 (C.A. 6).

Affirmed.
# C_2010107EN.01000201.xml

| 27.4.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 April 2010

2010/C 107/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3321 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4420 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86240 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5680 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4341 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 7,8505 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,430 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 263,42 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7077 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 3,8788 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1178 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 1,9667 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4336 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3310 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3421 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,8417 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,8220 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 470,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 9,8016 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0937 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2575 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 12 000,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2407 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,918 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 38,7700 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,940 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,3254 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1730 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 59,1390 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3321

JPY

Japanese yen

125,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4420

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86240

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5680

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4341

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

7,8505

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,430

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

263,42

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7077

PLN

Polish zloty

3,8788

RON

Romanian leu

4,1178

TRY

Turkish lira

1,9667

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4336

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3310

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3421

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,8417

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,8220

KRW

South Korean won

1 470,83

ZAR

South African rand

9,8016

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0937

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2575

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

12 000,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2407

PHP

Philippine peso

58,918

RUB

Russian rouble

38,7700

THB

Thai baht

42,940

BRL

Brazilian real

2,3254

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1730

INR

Indian rupee

59,1390

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of IVAX Diagnostics, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Deutsch, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 30, 2009



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Mark S. Deutsch        
|Mark S. Deutsch,           
|Principal Financial Officer
Page 1 of 2

 IN T H E U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TYRONE RAHMINGS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv240/RS/CJK

DAVID ELLIS, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This civil rights case is before the court upon plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary

Dismissal. (Doc. 17). Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, this action should be dismissed.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this cause be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 1 day of April, 2011.

st

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object

may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636;

United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Case No: 5:10cv240/RS/CJK
Exhibit
      10(m)




Mike
        McCall
 Employment
        Arrangements
  Since
        March 6, 2006, TXU Corp. (the “Company”) has employed Mike McCall, who is the
        Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of TXU Wholesale, on an
        at-will employee basis. The Company pays Mr. McCall an annual salary equal
        to $325,000, and Mr. McCall is eligible to participate in all compensation
        and benefit plans of the Company in which similarly situated executives are
        eligible to participate, which currently include the TXU Corp. Executive
        Annual
        Incentive Plan, the TXU Corp. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan, the TXU Corp.
        Salary
        Deferral Plan, the TXU Executive Financial Advisement Program, the Executive
        Physical Examination Program, the TXU Second Supplemental Retirement Plan,
        the
        TXU Corp. Executive Change in Control Policy and the TXU Corp. 2005 Executive
        Severance Plan. Additionally, Mr. McCall participates in the TXU Deferred
        and
        Incentive Compensation Plan and the TXU Split Dollar Life Insurance
        Program.
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-3      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 1 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-3      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 2 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-3      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 3 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-3      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 4 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-3      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 5 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-3      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 6 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-3      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 7 of 7
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Genesis Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Michael Handelman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 14, 2012
By:
/s/ Michael HandelmanMichael HandelmanChief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTWOINE MARQUISE BEALER,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

WILSON, Lieutenant of Administrative Segregation Unit at Kern Valley State
Prison,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 17

- 16173

D.C. No. 1:16

- cv

- 00672

- DAD

- SAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 13, 2018 **

Before: LEAVY , M. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Antwoine Marquise Bealer appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

unconstitutional conditions of confinement. We have jurisdicti on under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 26 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 16173

§ 1291. We review de novo

. Resnick v. Hayes , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000)

(dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Barren v. Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194

(9th Cir. 1998) (order) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii))

. We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Bealer’s action because Bealer failed to

allege facts sufficient to show that defendant Wilson knew of or disregarded an

excessive risk to Bealer’s health. See Hallett v. Morgan

, 296 F.3d 732, 744 (9th

Cir. 2002) ( elements of Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim); s ee

also F armer v. Brennan

, 511 U.S. 825, 8 4 7 (1994) ( prison official s liable for

denying humane conditions of confinement only if they know of and disregard a

substantial risk of serious harm ).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th C ir. 2009).

Bealer’s request for an extension of time to file the opening brief (Docket

Entry No. 10) is denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRM ED

.
# EUR-Lex - 52011PC0754 - EN

*|*

# 52011PC0754

**Joint Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya /* COM/2011/0754 final - 2011/0337 (NLE) */**

			*

			*

EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

(1)
On 27 October 2011 the Security Council of the
United Nations decided that the ban on all flights in the airspace of Libya,
which it had imposed by Resolution 1973(2011) of 17 March 2011, should be
terminated from 23.59 Libyan local time on 31 October 2011.

(2)
The High Representative for Foreign Affairs and
Security Policy and the European Commission therefore propose to repeal the
corresponding ban laid down in Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning
restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya.

2011/0337 (NLE)

Joint Proposal for a

COUNCIL REGULATION

amending Regulation (EU) No 204/2011
concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 215 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2011/.../CFSP
of ... 2011 amending Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive
measures in view of the situation in Libya[1],

Having regard to the joint proposal from
the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
and the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)
By means of its Resolution 2016, the Security
Council of the United Nations decided on 27 October 2011 that the ban on all
flights in the airspace of Libya, which had been decided on 17 March 2011,
should be terminated.

(2)
Further to Decision 2011/137/CFSP this ban on
flights has been given effect in the European Union by Regulation (EC) No
204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya[2]as amended[3].

(3)
In line with Decision 2011/.../CFSP the relevant
provision of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 should therefore be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 4b of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011
is deleted.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on
the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the
European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding
in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For
the Council

The
President

[1]               OJ L ..., ...2011, p. ...

[2]               OJ L 58. 3.3.2011, p. 1.

[3]               Regulation (EU) No 296/2011 (OJ L 80, 26.3.2011, p. 2).