alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-89,914-01, WR- 89,914-02, WR-89,914- 03, WR-89,914-04, WR-89,914-05

EX P ARTE HUGO D. P ACHAS-LUNA, Applicant
ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. 1370904-A, 1370905-A, 1370906-A , 1370907-A, & 1370908- A IN THE 230 DISTRICT COURT FROMHARRIS COUNTY

T H
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for wr i t s o f h ab ea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of five counts of possession of child pornography and sentenc ed to eig ht y ear s’ imprisonment on eac h count. The First Court of Appea ls aff irmed his convictions. Pachas-Luna v. State , Nos. 01-14-00516- CR, 01- 1 4

- 0 0 5 1 7
- CR , 0 1

- 1 4

- 0 0 5 1 8

- CR , 0 1

- 1 4

- 0 0 5 1 9

- CR , 0 1

- 1 4

- 0 0 520-CR (Tex. App.—Houston [1 ] O c t. st 15, 2015). Applicant contends that his trial counsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use he did not proper ly object to and pr eser

ve issues re g ardinga motion to suppress.2

Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief
. Strickland v. W

ashington , 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson , 993 S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim o f i n ef fec tive assistance of counsel. The trial court may

use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)
. I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall determine whe ther Applica nt is indi g ent. I f Applicant is indige nt and wi s h es to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent Applicant at the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make fi n d i ng s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether the perf ormanc e of Appl i ca n t ’s trial counsel was defic ient and, if so, whether counsel’s defic ient perf ormanc e prejudice d Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claim for habea s corpus re lief. These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 day s of this orde r. A supplemental transcript c ontaining all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, alongwith the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be for war ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. Any extensions of ti me must be re quested by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court. Filed: June 5, 2019 Do not publish
Exhibit 31.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certifications

I, David Weisman, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Eagle Broadband, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects,
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in
the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting. 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:  March 30, 2004


/S/ David Weisman_______
David Weisman,
Chief Executive Officer
Presidential Documents

61045 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 207 

Friday, October 26, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of October 24, 2007 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the 

Situation in or in Relation to the Democratic Republic of the 

Congo 

On October 27, 2006, by Executive Order 13413, I declared a national 

emergency with respect to the situation in or in relation to the Democratic 

Republic of the Congo and, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), ordered related measures blocking 

the property of certain persons contributing to the conflict in that country. 

I took this action to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to 

the foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in or 

in relation to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which has been marked 

by widespread violence and atrocities that continue to threaten regional 

stability and was addressed by the United Nations Security Council in 

Resolution 1596 of April 18, 2005, Resolution 1649 of December 21, 2005, 

and Resolution 1698 of July 31, 2006. 

Because this situation continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the foreign policy of the United States, the national emergency declared 

on October 27, 2006, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with 

that emergency, must continue in effect beyond October 27, 2007. Therefore, 

in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 

U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared 

in Executive Order 13413. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

October 24, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–5375 

Filed 10–25–07; 9:45 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate recor d, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. Se e Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered sub mitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### FEB 27 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
EMANUEL E. GOINES, Plaintiff - Appellant, vs. MIKE HILL, Sheriff of Sedgwick County, Defendant - Appellee. No. 97-3135 (D.C. No. 96-CV-3016) (D.Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges. ** Plaintiff Emanuel E. Goines, appearing pro se, appe als the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Mike Hill in this § 1983 action. Mr. Goines alleges he received inadequate medical care while an inmate at the Sedgwick County Jail. We exercise jurisdict ion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.- 2 -

We review the district court’s grant of summary jud gment de novo, applying the same legal standards as the district c ourt. See Kaul v. Stephan , 83 F.3d 1208, 1212 (10th Cir. 1996). Summary judgmentis appropriate if “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c ). Defendant’s Martinez report may not be used to resolve factual disputes. See Hall v. Bellmon , 935 F.2d 1106, 1111 (10th Cir. 1991). Thus, we treat the statement of facts presented in Mr. Goines’s verified complaint as true for purposes of this motion, and construe those facts and inferences reasonably made from the m in the light most favorable to Mr. Goines. See Jaxon v. Circle K Corp. , 773 F.2d 1138, 1139 n.1 (10th Cir. 1985).Our review of the record indicates the district cou rt properly held that Mr. Goines’s claim of constitutionally inadequate medic al treatment is insufficient as a matter of law. The prostate infection plaintiff suffered from does constitute a serious medical need; however, Mr. Goines failed to present any specific facts which would indicate defendant was deliberately ind ifferent to his need for treatment. See Wilson v. Seiter , 501 U.S. 294, 298 (1991). Further, the undisputed information in the Martinez report suggests repeated treatment. At best, Mr. Goines’s claims that the medical staff prescribed i neffective and generic medications, see I R. doc. 2 at 5, indicate mere disagreement with the nature of- 3 -

the care provided or the course of treatment prescr ibed, which does not rise to the level of deliberate indifference. See Ledoux v. Davies , 961 F.2d 1536, 1537 (10th Cir. 1992). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Th e mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER C. CARTER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-34-SPM/WCS

LEE, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 53), which recommends that the Motion for Summary

Judgment (doc. 48) be granted. The Parties have been furnished a copy and have

been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the

Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 53) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 48) is granted and judgment

shall be entered in favor of Defendant Lee.

3. The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket that this cause was

dismissed as malicious pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and

thereby constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.

Case 4:10-cv-00034-SPM-WCS Document 54 Filed 07/26/11 Page 1 of 2
§1915(g).

4. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-sixth day of July, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00034-SPM-WCS Document 54 Filed 07/26/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of AAA Public Adjusting Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Kevin Monahan, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  November 13, 2009 | /s/ Kevin Monahan                                       
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------
|                         | Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AAA Public Adjusting Group, Inc and will be retained by AAA Public Adjusting Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Special Emphasis Panel; Pathway to Independence Awards (K99's).                    

*Date:*                         October 29, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         William J Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7178, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0725,                         *johnsonw@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Disease Research; 93.838, Lung Disease Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research; National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 2, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-4979  Filed 10-9-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
|                             |            |                                       |   |
|----------------------------------|-----------------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:      August 16,      2010 | By:   | /s/      James A. Banister                 |   |
|                             |            | James      A. Banister,                    |   |
|                             |            | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                             |            | (Principal      Executive Officer)         |   |

|                             |            |                                                                    |   |
|----------------------------------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:      August 16,      2010 | By:   | /s/      Rebecca D. Hershinger                                          |   |
|                             |            | Rebecca      D. Hershinger,                                             |   |
|                             |            | Chief      Financial Officer                                            |   |
|                             |            | (Principal      Financial Officer andPrincipal      Accounting Officer) |   |

----
#### N. C. GRANGE INS. CO. v. JOHNSON

No. 145 PC.

No. 79 (Fall Term).

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 447.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 8 July 1981.
#### STATE v. WRIGHT

No. 145 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 675.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 August 1972.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2014

h1217

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2014

149332

PHIL FORNER,

Appellant,

v SC: 149332

COA: 317298

Ottawa CC: 12-002922-AA

ALLENDALE CHARTER TOWNSHIP,

Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 6 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 216 (Thursday, November 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5578]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


National Research Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the National Research 
Advisory Council will hold a meeting on Monday, December 3, 2007, in 
Room 900 at the Greenhoot Cohen Building, 1722 Eve Street, NW., 
Washington, DC. The meeting will convene at 8 a.m. and end at 3 p.m. 
The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Council is to provide external advice and review 
for VA's research mission. The December 3 meeting agenda will include a 
review of the VA research portfolio. The Council will also provide 
feedback on the direction/focus on VA's research initiatives.
    Any member of the public who expects to attend the meeting or wants 
additional information should contact Jay A. Freedman, Ph.D., 
Designated Federal Officer, at (202) 254-0267. Oral comments from the 
public will not be accepted at the meeting. Written statements or 
comments should be transmitted electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c060d15420a1e090908010d022c1a0d420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="244e455d0a425641414049454a6452450a434b52">[email protected]</span></a> or 
mailed to Dr. Freedman at Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of 
Research and Development (12), 810 Vermont Ave., NW., Washington, DC 
20420.

    Dated: November 2, 2007.
    By direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-5578 Filed 11-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

COLLEEN B. ANDERSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09cv282/RS-MD

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner

of Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20). No

objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed pursuant

to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g) and is remanded to the

Commissioner for further consideration consistent with the Report and

Recommendation.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on September 22, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE