alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1934 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1934

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide benefits from the 
Department of Veterans Affairs for persons disabled by treatment under 
      the Veterans Community Care Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2019

  Mr. Tester (for himself, Mrs. Murray, and Mr. Brown) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide benefits from the 
Department of Veterans Affairs for persons disabled by treatment under 
      the Veterans Community Care Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Parity in Veterans Health Care 
Rights Act''.

SEC. 2. BENEFITS FOR PERSONS DISABLED BY TREATMENT UNDER VETERANS 
              COMMUNITY CARE PROGRAM.

    Subsection (a) of section 1151 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3);
            (2) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``or'' at the end; and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new 
        paragraph (2):
            ``(2) the disability or death was caused by hospital care, 
        a medical service, or an extended care service furnished the 
        veteran by a non-Department provider under section 1703 of this 
        title and the proximate cause of the disability or death was--
                    ``(A) carelessness, negligence, lack of proper 
                skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault 
                on the part of the provider in furnishing the hospital 
                care, medical or surgical treatment, or examination; or
                    ``(B) an event not reasonably foreseeable; or''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANTHONY SIKORA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv166-RH/WCS

OFFICER WHITE et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 9. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “This case is DISMISSED without

prejudice.” The clerk must close the file. 

SO ORDERED on August 31, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 20, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65290-65291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5753]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of New Fee Site; Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act, 
(Title VIII, Pub. L. 108-447)

AGENCY: Coronado National Forest, USDA Forest Service, Tucson, Arizona.

ACTION: Notice of New Fee Site.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coronado National Forest proposes to begin charging a new 
$150.00 per day fee for rental of the Rockfellow House located 10 miles 
west of Sunsites, Arizona. Rental of the Cabin includes overnight use. 
Rental of the cabin and other facilities within the Arizona National 
Forests has shown that the public appreciates and enjoys the 
availability of historic rental facilities. Funds from the rentals will 
be used for the continued operation and maintenance of the Rockfellow 
House.

DATES: Rockfellow House will become available for rent July, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Coronado National Forest, 300 West Congress, Tucson, AZ 
85701

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Makansi, Archaeologist, Coronado 
National Forest, (520) 760-2502.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act 
(Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to 
publish a six month advance notice in the Federal Register whenever new 
recreation fee areas are established. The

[[Page 65291]]

Coronado National Forest currently has one other rental facility. This 
facility is booked regularly throughout the rental season. A business 
analysis for the rental of the Rockfellow House shows that people 
desire having this sort of recreation experience on the Coronado 
National Forest. A market analysis indicates that the $150.00 daily fee 
is both reasonable and acceptable for this sort of unique recreation 
experience.
    People wanting to rent the Rockfellow House will need to do so 
through the National Recreation Reservation Service, at 
www.recreation.gov or by calling 1-877-444-6777. The National 
Recreation Reservation Service charges a $9 fee per reservation.

    Dated: November 13, 2007.
Jeanine Derby,
Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest.
[FR Doc. 07-5753 Filed 11-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT EARL ROYSTER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv195/RV/EMT

ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc.

1). By order dated June 10, 2010, the court noted that it was unclear whether Plaintiff intended to

file the complaint as an original complaint in a new civil rights action or as an amended complaint

in Royster v. Morgan, Case No. 3:10cv30/LAC/MD. The court therefore directed Plaintiff to clarify

his intent, by filing either a notice that the complaint was intended as an amended complaint in the

prior action or by paying the filing fee/seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a new action.

Plaintiff has now filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, thereby apparently

signaling his intent to proceed with a new action. Before the court proceeds further with this action,

however, Plaintiff shall be required to file a notice which (1) states whether he is incarcerated at

Florida State Hospital as a prisoner or is confined there simply as a nonprisoner patient, and (2)

verifies that he intends to initiate a new, separate action for which he must either prepay the filing

fee in full or demonstrate his eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Plaintiff

shall file a notice which (1) states whether he is incarcerated at Florida State Hospital as a prisoner

or is confined there simply as a nonprisoner patient, and (2) verifies that he intends to initiate a new,
Page 2 of 2

separate action for which he must either prepay the filing fee in full or demonstrate his eligibility

to proceed in forma pauperis.

2. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order as instructed may result in a

recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of June 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cv195/RV/EMT
Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Shane Broesky, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Lux Energy Corp. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the fiscal
          quarter ended Sept. 30, 2009, and to which this certification is
          attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


                                  By: /s/ Shane Broesky
                                     ----------------------------------------
                                  Name:   Shane Broesky
                                  Title:  Chief Executive Officer and
                                          Chief Financial Officer

                                  Date: November 20, 2009


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.02





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geo Point Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey Brimhall, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/ Jeffrey Brimhall


Jeffrey Brimhall


Principal Financial Officer


November 22, 2010





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.01




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO




SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, John
Hummel, the President and principal executive and principal financial officer of
AIS Futures Management LLC, the General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV LP (the
“Partnership”), certify that (i) but for the inclusion of an audited balance
sheet of the General Partner required pursuant to Section 210.8-07 of Regulation
S-X, which is to be filed by amendment, the Annual Report of the Partnership on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.




Date:
March 31, 2009




By:  /s/ John
Hummel


John
Hummel


President
(principal executive and principal financial officer)


AIS
Futures Management LLC


General
Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOHN B. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv309-SPM/WCS

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 28). The Parties were furnished copies and both

have filed objections (docs. 29, 30). Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1), this Court has made a de novo determination of those portions

to which an objection has been made. Despite the objections, the Court finds that

the Report and Recommendation is legally accurate and should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 28) is

adopted and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Plaintiff’s complaint is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

3. The Defendant’s Motion for Injunctive Relief (doc. 23) is denied.
Page 2 of 2

4. All other pending motions are denied as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this twentieth day of October, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
# C_2009289EN.01000501.xml

| 28.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 289/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 289/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 November 2009

2009/C 289/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4918 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,20 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4427 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90910 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4323 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5064 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4920 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,186 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,32 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1635 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2788 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2830 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6507 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5992 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,5620 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1087 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0705 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 753,43 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1540 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1866 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3180 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 224,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0587 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,413 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,7769 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,565 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6010 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,3606 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,5925 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4918

JPY

Japanese yen

129,20

DKK

Danish krone

7,4427

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90910

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4323

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5064

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4920

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,186

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,32

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1635

RON

Romanian leu

4,2788

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2830

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6507

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5992

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,5620

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1087

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0705

KRW

South Korean won

1 753,43

ZAR

South African rand

11,1540

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1866

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3180

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 224,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0587

PHP

Philippine peso

70,413

RUB

Russian rouble

43,7769

THB

Thai baht

49,565

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6010

MXN

Mexican peso

19,3606

INR

Indian rupee

69,5925

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MARCUS ISOM,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-177-MMP-AK

WALTER A. MCNEIL,

Respondent.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 9, Respondent’s Motion for Extension of Time to

File Response. Having carefully considered the matter, the Court finds the motion is well taken,

and it is GRANTED. Respondent shall file his response no later than December 21, 2009.

Petitioner may file a reply no later than January 21, 2010.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21th day of October, 2009.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 26 (Thursday, February 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 5983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-561]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Trauma and Burn Program Project.
    Date: February 22, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health--NIGMS, Natcher Building, 
45 Center Drive, 3AN-18, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Brian R. Pike, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center 
Drive, Room 3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3907, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ea9a83818898aa878b8386c4848382c48d859c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="186871737a6a587579717436767170367f776e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.275, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 1, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-561 Filed 2-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORP., 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-71/RS-CJK

KARA-O-KING INC, et. al, 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

In Response to my Order (Doc. 62), Plaintiff has represented (Doc. 63) that the 

following Defendants have operations or reside in districts outside of the Northern 

District: 

Defendant Residence District Operations District 

Karoke Miami 

LLC

Miami-Dade SD Miami-Dade SD

Jason Butler Pasco MD Hillsborough MD

Big Dog Karoke Hernando MD Hernando/Pinellas MD

Katherine L. 

Simmons

Hernando MD Hernando/Pinellas MD

Wilfred J. 

Simmons

Hernando MD Hernando/Pinellas MD

Gary J. Sonnay Pinellas MD Pasco MD

Dale Dunn Pasco MD Pasco MD

Dunn Deal 

Entertainment

Hillsborough MD Hillsborough MD

Case 5:10-cv-00071-RS-CJK Document 65 Filed 07/08/11 Page 1 of 2
Chris Dunn Unknown Hillsborough MD

Joseph A. Dunn Unknown Hillsborough MD

IT IS ORDERED: 

The clerk is directed to transfer these Defendants to the appropriate district. 

ORDERED on July 8, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00071-RS-CJK Document 65 Filed 07/08/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANTHONY SIKORA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-147-SPM-WCS

PARAMORE,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 13). Plaintiff has been mailed a copy and has been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the Report

and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 13) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

DONE AND ORDERED this third day of September, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MARCUS ISOM,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-177-MP-GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 40, Petitioner’s “Motion to Supplement

Federal Habeas Petition with Exhausted Newly Discovered Evidence Claim and Notice

to Court.” Petitioner’s § 2254 petition was filed in 2009 and fully briefed. (Docs. 1, 13,

18.) Shortly thereafter, Petitioner moved to stay his habeas petition based on a motion

for a new trial filed in state court claiming newly discovered evidence regarding a key

state witness. (Doc. 21.) This Court granted the stay, because if “the new trial were

granted, the instant habeas corpus petition would become unnecessary, and if the new

trial were denied, the petition could be amended to include any and all claims so that

they could be adjudicated at once.” (Doc. 23.)

Petitioner has filed status reports every 90 days since the case was stayed, and

on December 6, 2012, in his motion to supplement, notified the Court that his state

proceedings had concluded. Petitioner’s motion for a new trial was denied by the trial

court and again on appeal, with mandate issuing by the First DCA on November 14,
Page 2 of 2

2012. Petitioner contends that he has now fully exhausted these new claims and

wishes to amend his petition accordingly. To that end, he has attached his appellate

brief on the new claims. (Doc. 40.)

Petitioner’s original petition contained 12 grounds of ineffective assistance of

counsel. His petition is due to be amended as described in Doc. 40, to include

additional claims regarding recanted evidence by state witness Kevin Jermaine

Patterson, alleged police misconduct, and alleged withholding of evidence by the

prosecution. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

1. Petitioner’s motion to supplement his § 2254 habeas petition, construed as a

motion to amend the petition, (Doc. 40) is GRANTED.

2. The Government shall file a response to the claims raised in Petitioner’s

motion to supplement on or before January 10, 2013. Absent exigent

circumstances, no extensions of time will be granted to brief these discrete

issues, given the age of the case.

3. Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, on or before February 11, 2013.

4. The Clerk is directed to lift the stay in this case, pursuant to the Court’s

previous Order, Doc. 23, as the state court motion for a new trial has been

resolved.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11 day of December 2012. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:09-cv-177-MP-GRJ