Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 232 / Monday, December 5, 2005 / Notices 72499 

operate certain aircraft under part 135 

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S) 

transponder installed on those aircraft. 

Grant, 09/15/2005, Exemption No. 

7663B. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–22333. 

Petitioner: Yukon Air Service, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To allow Yukon Air 

Service, Inc., to operate certain aircraft 

under part 135 without a TSO–C112 

(Mode S) transponder installed on those 

aircraft. 

Grant, 09/15/2005, Exemption No. 

8634. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–22239. 

Petitioner: Mauiscape Helicopters, 

Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To allow Mauiscape 

Helicopters, Inc., to operate certain 

aircraft under part 135 without a TSO–

C112 (Mode S) transponder installed in 

the aircraft. 

Grant, 09/15/2005, Exemption No. 

8633. 

Docket No.: FAA–2002–13316. 

Petitioner: Monterey Bay NinetyNines. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.251, 135.255, and 135.353. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To allow the Monterey Bay 

Ninety-Nines to conduct local 

sightseeing flights at the Watsonville 

Municipal Airport, Watsonville, 

California, on October 29, 2005, for 

compensation or hire, without 

complying with certain anti-drug and 

alcohol misuse prevention requirements 

of part 135. 

Grant, 09/14/2005, Exemption No. 

8632. 

Docket No.: FAA–2004–17410. 

Petitioner: Stuart Air Show. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.251, 135.255, and 135.353. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To allow Stuart Air Show 

to conduct local sightseeing flights at 

the Martin County Airport, Stuart, 

Florida, for the Stuart Air Show on or 

about November 12 and 13, 2005, for 

compensation or hire, without 

complying with certain anti-drug and 

alcohol misuse prevention requirements 

of part 135. 

Grant, 09/14/2005, Exemption No. 

8631. 

Docket No.: FAA–2002–12010. 

Petitioner: Taunton Airport 

Association, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.251, 135.255, and 135.353. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To allow Taunton Airport 

Association, Inc., to conduct local 

sightseeing flights to benefit local 

charities at the Taunton Municipal 

Airport, East Taunton, Massachusetts, 

on October 22, 2005, with a rain date of 

October 23, 2005, for compensation or 

hire, without complying with certain 

anti-drug and alcohol misuse prevention 

requirements of part 135. 

Grant, 9/14/2005, Exemption No. 

8630. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–10289. 

Petitioner: EVA Airways Corporation. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

61.77(a) and (b) and 63.23(a). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To allow the issuance of 

U.S. special purpose pilot 

authorizations and U.S. special purpose 

flight engineer certificated to airmen 

employed by EVA Airways Corporation 

without those airmen meeting the 

requirement to hold a current foreign 

certificate or license issued by a foreign 

contracting State to the Convention on 

International Civil Aviation. 

Grant, 09/09/2005, Exemption No. 

6689E. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–10223. 

Petitioner: Kapowsin Air Sports, Ltd. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

105.29. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To allow Kapowsin Air 

Sports, Ltd., to conduct parachute 

operations within a 2-mile radius of 

Kapowsin Field when published cloud 

clearances cannot be maintained. 

Denial, 09/06/2005, Exemption No. 

8627. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–22231. 

Petitioner: Save-A-Connie, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.315. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To allow Save-A-Connie, 

Inc., to carry its members and sponsors 

on local demonstration or promotional 

flights for compensation or hire in its 

Lockheed L–1049 Super Constellation 

and Martin 4–0–4 airplanes. 

Denial, 09/06/2005, Exemption No. 

8628. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9142. 

Petitioner: Honeywell Aerospace. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

21.325(b)(3). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To allow Honeywell 

Aerospace to issue export airworthiness 

approval tags for class II and class III 

products manufactured at Honeywell’s 

Singapore facility. 

Grant, 09/01/2005, Exemption No. 

7075D. 

[FR Doc. E5–6798 Filed 12–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Aircraft, Trip-Free Single Phase 115 

VAC, 400 Hz Arc Fault Circuit Breakers 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of availability and 

request for public comment. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

availability of, and requests comment on 

proposed Technical Standard Order 

(TSO) C–178, Aircraft, Trip-Free Single 

Phase 115 VAC, 400 Hz Arc Fault 

Circuit Breakers. This proposed TSO 

tells persons seeking a TSO 

authorization or letter of design 

approval what minimum performance 

standards (MPS) their arc fault circuit 

breakers must meet to be identified with 

the appropriate TSO marking. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before January 4, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: Send all comments on this 

proposed TSO to: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Aircraft 

Certification Service, Aircraft 

Engineering Division, Avionics Systems 

Branch (AIR–130), 800 Independence 

Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591. 

Attn: Ms. Charisse Green. Or, you may 

deliver comments to: Federal Aviation 

Administration, Room 815, 800 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Charisse Green, AIR–130, Room 815, 

Federal Aviation Administration, 800 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591. Telephone (202) 

385–4637, fax (202) 385–4651. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

You are invited to comment on the 

proposed TSO by submitting written 

data, views, or arguments to the above 

address. Comments received may be 

examined, both before and after the 

closing date, in room 815 at the above 

address, weekdays except federal 

holidays, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 

p.m. The Director, Aircraft Certification 

Service, will consider all comments 

received on or before the closing date 

before issuing the final TSO. 

Background 

The proposed TSO–C178 provides a 

minimum operating standard for TripVerDate Aug<31>2005 17:14 Dec 02, 2005 Jkt 208001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\05DEN1.SGM 05DEN1
72500 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 232 / Monday, December 5, 2005 / Notices 

Free Single Phase 115 VAC, 400 Hz 

circuit breakers, which provides an 

equivalent level of thermal protection to 

existing thermal circuit breakers, with 

the added ability of detection and 

reaction to arc fault conditions, thus 

diminishing damage to the wiring 

system caused by prolonged arcing 

events. The Arc Fault Circuit Breaker 

thereby diminishes damage to the 

aircraft wiring from the circuit breaker 

to the first serial load element, which 

reduces the potential of igniting 

surrounding material. 

How To Obtain Copies 

You can view or download the 

proposed TSO from its online location 

at: www.airweb.faa.gov/rgl. At this Web 

page, select ‘‘Technical Standard 

Orders.’’ At the TSO page, select 

‘‘Proposed TSOs.’’ For a paper copy, 

contact the person listed in FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. Note, SAE 

International documents are 

copyrighted and may not be reproduced 

without the written consent of SAE 

International. You may purchase copies 

of SAE International documents from: 

SAE International, 400 Commonwealth 

Drive, Warrendale, PA 15096–0001, or 

directly from their Web site: http:// 

www.sae.org/. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on November 

28, 2005. 

Susan J. M. Cabler, 

Assistant Manager, Aircraft Engineering 

Division, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 05–23631 Filed 12–2–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–M 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA–2005–22932] 

Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping 

Requirements 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT. 

ACTION: Request for public comment on 

proposed collection of information. 

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can 

collect certain information from the 

public, it must receive approval from 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). Under procedures established 

by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995, before seeking OMB approval, 

Federal agencies must solicit public 

comment on proposed collections of 

information, including extensions and 

reinstatements of previously approved 

collections. 

This document describes the 

collection of information for which 

NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before February 3, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to U.S. Department of Transportation 

Dockets, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Plaza 

401, Washington, DC 20590. Docket No. 

NHTSA–2005–22932. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Siegler, PhD., Contracting Officer’s 

Technical Representative, Office of 

Research and Technology (NTI–132), 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration, 400 Seventh Street, 

SW., Room 5119, Washington, DC 

20590. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

before an agency submits a proposed 

collection of information to OMB for 

approval, it must publish a document in 

the Federal Register providing a 60-day 

comment period and otherwise consult 

with members of the public and affected 

agencies concerning each proposed 

collection of information. The OMB has 

promulgated regulations describing 

what must be included in such a 

document. Under OMB’s regulations (at 

5 CFR 1320.8(d)), an agency must ask 

for public comment on the following: 

(i) Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

(ii) The accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

collection of information, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

(iii) How to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and 

(iv) How to minimize the burden of 

the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including the use 

of appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, and or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. e.g., permitting 

electronic submissions of responses. 

In compliance with these 

requirements, NHTSA asks public 

comment on the following proposed 

collection of information: 

Evaluation Surveys for Impaired 

Driving and Safety Belt Interventions 

Type of Request—New information 

collection requirement. 

OMB Clearance Number—None. 

Form Number—This collection of 

information uses no standard forms. 

Requested Expiration Date of 

Approval—3 years from date of 

approval. 

Summary of the Collection of 

Information—The National Highway 

Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) 

proposes to conduct telephone surveys 

to evaluate interventions designed to 

increase safety belt use and reduce 

impaired driving. Sample sizes would 

range from 200 to 2000 depending on 

the geographic unit being surveyed 

(Nation, Region, State, Community) and 

the evaluation design for the 

intervention (e.g., number of analytic 

groups). Interview length would be 10 

minutes. The surveys would collect 

information on attitudes, awareness, 

knowledge, and behavior related to the 

intervention. The surveys would follow 

a pre-post design where they are 

administered prior to the 

implementation of the intervention and 

after its conclusion. Interim survey 

waves may also be administered if the 

duration of the intervention permits. 

In conducting the proposed surveys, 

the interviewers would use computerassisted telephone interviewing to 

reduce interview length and minimize 

recording errors. A Spanish Language 

translation and bilingual interviewers 

would be used to minimize language 

barriers to participation. The proposed 

surveys would be anonymous and 

confidential. 

Description of the Need for the 

Information and Proposed Use of the 

Information—The National Highway 

Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) 

was established to reduce the mounting 

number of deaths, injuries, and 

economic losses resulting from motor 

vehicle crashes on the Nation’s 

highways. As part of this statutory 

mandate, NHTSA is authorized to 

conduct research as a foundation for the 

development of motor vehicle standards 

and traffic safety programs. 

The heavy toll that impaired driving 

exacts on the Nation in fatalities, 

injuries, and economic costs is well 

documented. Strong documentation also 

exists to show that wearing a safety belt 

is one of the most important actions a 

person can take to prevent injury or 

fatality in the event of a crash, but a 

significant proportion of the population 

still does not wear them. The 

persistence of these traffic safety 

problems points to a continuing need 

for effective interventions to address 

impaired driving and non-use of safety 

belts. This in turn calls for strong 

evaluation efforts to identify what 

interventions are effective. This 

includes monitoring key interventions 

that have been shown to be effective in 

order to determine whether they are