alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
alo-ex410_45.htm



 

 

EXHIBIT 4.10



 

 

Consent of Qualified Person 

 

 

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Form 20-F”) of Alio Gold Inc., I, Mani Verma, P.Eng., hereby consent to the use of my name in connection with the references to the technical report entitled “NI 43-101 F1 Technical Report Updated Resources and Reserves and Mine Plan for the San Francisco Gold Project, Sonora, Mexico”, dated May 25, 2017 with an effective date of April 1, 2017 (collectively, the “Technical Information”) and to the incorporation by reference of references to, and summaries of, the Technical Information in the Form 20-F.

 

 



 

 

 

 

“Mani Verma” 
Signature of Qualified Person

 

Mani Verma, P.Eng.,
Name of Qualified Person

 

Associate Engineer
Title of Qualified Person

 

 

Dated this 14th day of April, 2020

 

900 – 390 BAY STREET, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA M5H 2Y2

Telephone +1 416 362 5135   Fax +1 416 362 5763
# CE2014072EN.01010101.xml

| 11.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 72/101 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 72/101

---

Thursday 25 October 2012Conclusion, on behalf of the EU, of the Food Assistance Convention ***

P7_TA(2012)0393

European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 October 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Food Assistance Convention (12267/2012 – C7-0210/2012– 2012/0183(NLE))

2014/C 72 E/17

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (12267/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (12267/2012),

| — | having regard to the Food Assistance Convention (attached to the draft Council decision), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Food Assistance Convention (attached to the draft Council decision),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 214(4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0210/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 214(4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0210/2012),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Development (A7-0309/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Development (A7-0309/2012),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Convention; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Convention;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
UNL'I'LL) S'l'A'l'LS IIISTRICT COUK'I' 

SOUTHERN DISTRIC'S 01: NEW YORK 

IN RE: 

i hl:ZSTER FILE 

FOSAMAX PKOLl1!C'TS LIABILITY L,lTIGA'I'lON 

1 106-M 11- 1 789 (JFK) 

'177i.~ Llocuntent Keicrles To All Ac1ion.c 

ORDER FOR .4DhIISSION PRO HAG VICE 

Considering the Cerlijicate 01' Good Standing and ol l othcr docut~~cnts rcquired by Case 

Management Order No. 5 submitted by counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

..ll-'pl icant's Name: Kathlccn Sullivan Hardway UC-' r;srz,L *--I--- ---- 

Firm N;~mt.: Venable LLP 

Address: -1'tvo I Iopkins Plaza. Suite 1 800 

1 

CityIStatclZip: Haltimore. Maryland 2 1201 . w ,--- -- , ) 

3 -/y-u3 f 

_--..--....-- ii L-.- - .' "---"--urn"- 

-- .AIWI 

.I TelephoneTax: (4 1 0) 244-7400/(4 10) 244-7742 

Email Address: k shard~~-ay51::ve11able.com 

is acimilted to practice pro har \ icc as counsel lbr hIt.1-c.k & Co.. Iric. in the ahoi r. c:iptioned case 

in the I!nited Statcs I)isrric~ C'our~ fill- the Southern District of New York. 

New Yorli. Neu 1'~lrk 

d' 

r - 

(/ Il'nited States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03464-JFK Document 23 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Good 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 

I, Felicia C. Cannon, Clerk of the United States District Court for the District 

of hlaryland, 

DO HEREBY CERTIFY that, KATHLEEY F. SCLLI17AN, 

ESQUIRE, BAR NUMBER 25406, was duly admitted to practice in the 

United States District Court for the District of Mar?land on September I I, 1998, 

and is currently in good standing as a member of the bar of this Court. 

Dated at Baltimore, Maryland FEI,ICIA C. CANNOY 

Clerk 

Tina Stavrou - Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:07-cv-03464-JFK Document 23 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Khris Thetsy, certify that:




1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Explore Anywhere Holding Corp.




2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;









b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and









c)
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;




5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and









b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and




6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.






Date: June 17, 2011




By: /s/ Kris Thetsy


Name: Kris Thetsy Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOSEPH J. CABRAL,

Petitioner,

v. 3:10cv239-WS/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

May 31, 2012. See Doc. 29. The magistrate judge recommends that the petitioner's

petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. The petitioner has filed no objections to

the report and recommendation.

This court having reviewed the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, it

is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 29) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "The petitioner's petition for writ of

habeas corpus is denied."

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

Case 3:10-cv-00239-WS-EMT Document 34 Filed 07/17/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of July , 2012.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cv239-WS

Case 3:10-cv-00239-WS-EMT Document 34 Filed 07/17/12 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 1 of 43
EXHIBIT 3 

DECLARATION OF RUTH GRAHAM KERN 

FILED UNDER SEAL 

Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 2 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 3 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 4 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 5 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 6 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 7 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 8 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 9 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 10 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 11 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 12 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 13 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 14 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 15 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 16 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 17 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 18 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 19 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 20 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 21 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 22 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 23 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 24 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 25 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 26 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 27 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 28 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 29 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 30 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 31 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 32 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 33 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 34 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 35 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 36 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 37 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 38 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 39 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 40 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 41 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 42 of 43
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 33-15 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 43 of 43
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 225 (Friday, November 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65802-65803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5776]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at George M. Bryan Field Airport, Starkville, MS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on land release request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(c), 
notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from the 
City of Starkville to waive the requirement that a 1.87 acre parcel of 
surplus property, located at the George M. Bryan Field Airport, be used 
for aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 24, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in 
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Jackson Airports 
District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208-
2307.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Ms. Lynn Sprull, Chief Administrative Officer, 
City of Starkville, Starkville, MS, at the following address: City 
Hall, 101 Lampkin Street, Starkville, MS 39759.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Shumate, Program Manager, 
Jackson Airports District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, 
Jackson, MS 39208-2307, (601) 664-9882. The land release request may be 
reviewed in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is reviewing a request by City of 
Starkville, Starkville, MS to release 1.87 acres of surplus property at 
the George

[[Page 65803]]

M. Bryan Field Airport. The property, located on the West side of the 
airport, will be sold for fair market value.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office 
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the request, 
notice and other documents germane to the request in person at the 
George M. Bryan Field Airport, Starkville, Mississippi.

    Issued in Jackson, Mississippi, on November 8, 2007.
Rans Black,
Manager, Jackson Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 07-5776 Filed 11-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Social Security Administration

          - 20 CFR Part 416

### CFR Correction

In Title 20 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 400 to 499, revised as of April 1, 2006, on page 948, § 416.933 is corrected by adding a sentence after the second sentence to read as follows:

§ 416.933

* * * For other impairments, a finding of disability or blindness must be based on medical evidence or other information that, though not sufficient for a formal determination of disability or blindness, is sufficient for us to find that there is a high degree of probability that you are disabled or blind. * * *

[FR Doc. 07-55503 Filed 3-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JAMES COCHRAN, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv122/MCR/EMT

LT. GIELOW, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On April 26, 2010, this court

entered an order giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to pay the filing fee or submit a properly

completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 4). Plaintiff failed to respond to the order;

therefore, on June 1, 2010, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty

(20) days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court

(Doc. 6). The time for compliance with the show cause order has now elapsed, and Plaintiff has not

paid the filing fee or submitted a properly completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 22nd day of June 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:10cv122/MCR/EMT
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STATE OF FLORIDA, by and

through Bill McCollum, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER

The plaintiffs in this case seek to challenge the new federal health care law.

On May 14, 2010, they filed an amended complaint which, inter alia, adds several

new plaintiffs and raises three new claims. The defendants now move for a 30-day

extension of the scheduling deadlines previously set in this case in order to respond

to the amended complaint (doc. 43).

The original schedule allowed 33 days for the defendants to file a motion to

dismiss the amended complaint. That period is considerably larger than the 21 days

normally allowed by Rule 12 of the Civil Procedure Rules for most defendants. The

Rule allows additional time for the United States to respond because of the usual

need to ascertain routing responsibility and representation within the government.

However, that is not the situation in this case, and the defendants have known of

the plaintiffs’ basic claims since the original complaint was filed on March 23,

2010. Although the amended complaint adds new parties and raises new claims, all

the defendants are federal agencies or employees thereof. Consequently, they have

at their disposal the very substantial resources of the federal government, including

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 46 Filed 05/28/10 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

numerous attorneys and staff within and outside the United States Department of

Justice. I am confident that they have both the means and ability to respond to the

amended complaint within the time period originally set out in the scheduling order

and that an extension is unwarranted.

Further, as the defendants observe, there are “numerous lawsuits across the

country challenging the Act.” One of those is in Virginia (filed on the same day as

this one), and defendants recently filed a 52-page memorandum of law in support

of their motion to dismiss that case. Although the Virginia case was brought under

a state statute that is not applicable here, the fundamental arguments being raised

there in the motion to dismiss would appear to apply here (specifically, whether the

state has standing to sue on behalf of its citizens, whether the new health care law

is justified under the Commerce Clause, and issues of ripeness, jurisdiction, and

justiciability). The fact that the defendants have already researched and prepared a

substantial motion addressing the legal issues that are relevant to this case further

strengthens the conclusion that they should not need additional time to respond to

the plaintiffs’ amended complaint.

Accordingly, the motion for extension of time (doc. 43) is hereby DENIED.

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of May, 2010.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case No.: 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 46 Filed 05/28/10 Page 2 of 2
58828 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal Nos. 08–08] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601–

3740. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittals 08–08 

with attached transmittal, and policy 

justification. 

Dated: October 11, 2007. 

L.M. Bynum, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Notices 58829 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC07.024</GPH>
58830 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Notices 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC07.025</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 17, 2007 / Notices 58831 

[FR Doc. 07–5115 Filed 10–16–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICESEN17OC07.026</GPH>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
covered in the Report.
 /s/ D. Michael KramerD. Michael KramerPresident, Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer
  -83-