alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Christian Petersen, Respondent, *v.*East River Land Company et al., Appellants.

*Petersen*v. *East River Land Co.,*172 App. Div. 925, affirmed.

(Argued October 25, 1918;

decided November 12, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 21, 1916, *unanimously*affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to impress and foreclose a vendee’s lien against certain real property. Christian Petersen sued the East River Land Company and the Rickert-Finlay Realty Company, alleging that the Rickert-Finlay Realty Company was engaged in certain real estáte developments, among them one known as the *“*East River Heights; ” that the East River Land Company was practically the Rickert-Finlay Realty Company; that by reason of certain promises and representations by the Rickert-Finlay Realty Company, upon which he relied, he was induced to enter into a contract with the East River Land Company for the purchase of a lot; that certain of these representations - had been embodied in a covenant and made a part of the contract of sale; that he performed the contract' on his part; that the contract had not been carried out by defendants in that two material matters, namely, the. laying of sewers and the macadamizing of the street had not been done within a reasonable time; that the East River Land Company had ceased to be a going concern in 1911. The answer.of the East River Land Company denied the material allegations, and set .up a separate defense *675that the plaintiff refused to- perform. ' The answer of the Rickert-Finlay Realty Company was practically the same, except that it expressly alleged that it entered into a contract with, the plaintiff, and set out the contract.

*George E. Blackwell*for appellants.

*I. R. Oeland*and *H. E. J. MacDermott*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hisco.ck, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan and McLaughlin, JJ. Absent: Crane, J.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2319 

To allow the Coast Guard to consider the impacts of Hurricane Michael 

for the purpose of modifying contracts for offshore patrol cutters. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2019 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To allow the Coast Guard to consider the impacts of Hurricane Michael for the purpose of modifying contracts for 

offshore patrol cutters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restore Coast Guard 

5 Capabilities Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2319 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO CONTRACTS FOR OFFSHORE 

2 PATROL CUTTERS PERMITTED BASED ON IM3 PACTS OF HURRICANE MICHAEL. 

4 Notwithstanding Public Law 85–804, the United 

5 States Coast Guard is authorized to take into account the 

6 impacts of Hurricane Michael for the purpose of modi7 fying, without consideration, but not exceeding the origi8 nal affordability requirement as set forth in section C of 

9 the existing contract to construct Offshore Patrol Cutters 

10 upon a determination that doing so would facilitate na11 tional security. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2011153EN.01000901.xml

| 24.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/9

---

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran apply

2011/C 153/05

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons and entities that appear in Annex II to Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP (1) and in Annex VIII to Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 (2).

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons and entities that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should be included in the lists of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2010/413/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran.

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex V to Regulation (EU) No 961/2010, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 19 of the Regulation).

The persons and entities concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned lists should be reconsidered, by 31 July 2011, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 195, 27.7.2010, p. 39.

1

(2)  OJ L 281, 27.10.2010, p. 1.

2

---
Penelope



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 17, 2014

N o. 04

- 13

- 00903

- CV

John Edward SOTO II, a.k.a, Jonathan Herrasti, Appellant

v.

Penelope Jo SOTO

, Appellee

From the 438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- CI

- 00460 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Pres iding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due April 3, 2014. We granted appellant an extension until June 3, 2014, to file his brief. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of time has been

filed.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to file, on or before July 1, 2014 , his appellant’s brief and a written response reaso nably explaining (1) his failure to timely file the brief and (2) why appellee is not significantly injured by appellant ’s failure to timely file a brief. If ap pellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the d ate ordered, we will dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a); see also T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal if appellant has failed to comply with a court order).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2009023EN.01001201.xml

| 29.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/12

---

Calls for proposals under the work programme for 2009 of the Information and Communication Technologies Policy Support Programme as part of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013)

(2009/C 23/09)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the call for proposals under the work programme for 2009 of the Information and Communication Technologies Policy Support Programme (ICT PSP) as part of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007 to 2013).

Proposals are invited for the following call: CIP-ICT PSP-2009-3.

Call documentation including content, deadline and budget is given in the call texts which are published on the ICT PSP website:

http://ec.europa.eu/ict_psp

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Goldrich Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrich Mining Company.







/s/ Ted R. Sharp

DATE:  May 24, 2010

Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Goldrich Mining Company and will be retained by Goldrich Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











---
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-22      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-22      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-22      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 27-22      Filed 05/22/2008     Page 4 of 4
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WILLIAM DECHANT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00072-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 19, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, be

affirmed. The time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Upon

consideration, the Court agrees that although plaintiff had moderate mental impairments,

substantial evidence existed in the record to support the ALJ’s finding that plaintiff did not have

a substantial loss of ability to perform basic mental work-related activities associated with

unskilled work. Therefore, it was proper for the ALJ to use the Grids to determine whether

Plaintiff could perform work available in the national economy, without calling a vocational

expert. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and

incorporated herein. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is

affirmed. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of September, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00072-MP-GRJ Document 20 Filed 09/14/11 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-8053

KEVIN S. JACKSON,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

CIRCUIT COURT FOR HOWARD COUNTY,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:13-cv-03219-RDB)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin S. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Jackson appeals the district court’s order 

denying his request for mandamus relief. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Cir. Ct. 

of Howard Cnty., No. 1:13-cv-03219-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 4, 2013). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32



American Capital Agency Corp.

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



We, Malon Wilkus, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors, and
John R. Erickson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Capital Agency Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                                                                          
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |  |    
|Date: November 8, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    MALON
WILKUS                                                      
|                       |  |     |  | Malon Wilkus Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |    
|Date: November 8, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    JOHN R.
ERICKSON                                                  
|                       |  |     |  | John R. Erickson Chief
Financial Officer and Executive Vice President    



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSHUA S. FRIEBEL and 

ELIZABETH F. FRIEBEL,

husband and wife,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-120/RS-EMT

PARADISE SHORES OF BAY COUNTY,

LLC, a Florida limited liability company;

ROBERT E. BLACKERBY, an individual;

MAGNUM CAPITAL, LLC, a Florida limited

liability company; DURDEN ENTERPRISES

II, INC., a Delaware corporation; DURDEN

ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Florida limited

liability company; ESTATE OF KEDRICK

EARL DURDEN; MICHAEL EARL DURDEN,

as Personal Representative of the Estate of

Kedrick Earl Durden; and MH I, LLC, a Florida

limited liability company, 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Now that all parties have filed their appearances and in consideration of my 

previous Order (Doc. 37):

It is ordered that the parties shall file an amended joint report not later than 

November 12, 2010, with dates consistent with a discovery deadline of March 25, 2011, 

and a jury trial on March 6, 2011 or June 20, 2011. 
ORDERED on November 4, 2010

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 99

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SS. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of SulphCo, Inc.
(the "Company") for the annual period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Rudolf W.
Gunnerman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Pat Lacy, Controller,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Rudolf W. Gunnerman
--------------------------------------
Rudolf W. Gunnerman
Chief Executive Officer

April 21, 2003

/s/ Pat Lacy
--------------------------------------
Pat Lacy
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

April 21, 2003


         This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2011321EN.01000601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/6 |

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

2011/C 321/06

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Greece |
| Route concerned | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Astipalea | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Ikaria | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Leros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Milos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Samos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Chios | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Limnos–Mitilini–Chios–Samos–Rhodes | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Rhodes–Karpathos–Kasos–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Alexandroupoli–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Aktio–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Kithira | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Naxos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Paros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Karpathos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Skiathos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Corfu | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Rhodes–Kos–Kalimnos–Leros–Astipalea | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Corfu–Aktio–Kefalonia–Zakinthos–Kithira | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Kalimnos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Kalamata | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Skiros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Skiros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Rhodes–Kastelorizo | |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 April 2012-31 March 2016 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 61 days after the date of publication of the notice of public service obligations |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any information and/or documentation related to public tenders and the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge | | | | --- | | Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority | | Directorate-General for Air Transport | | Directorate for Air Operations | | Department Β | | Vassileos Georgiou 1 | | 166 04 Elliniko | | GREECE | | Tel. +30 2108916149 / 2108916121 | | Fax +30 2108947132 | | Internet: http://www.hcaa.gr | |

---
Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 6-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 6-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 6-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cr-00366-JSR Document 6-4 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 4 of 4
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:01CR41 LAC

SHAWN D. MOXAM

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on JUNE 20, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: JUDICIAL NOTICE (MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF JUDGE’S

ORDER OF MAY 30, 2008 (#166), DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REDUCTION

OF HIS SENTENCE, PURSUANT TO §3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on6/19/08 Doc.# 167

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 20th day of

June, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Note: There is no right to counsel for §3582 motion. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:01-cr-00041-LC-MD Document 168 Filed 06/20/08 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DONALD JAMES HELMS,

 Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv135/MCR/EMT

WARDEN MICHAEL BABCOCK, et al.,

 Respondents.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated December 1, 2010. (Doc. 25). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (doc. 1)

is DISMISSED without prejudice because the petition is not ripe for review unless and

until the BOP denies Petitioner’s CCF placement for more than six (6) months, and

because Petitioner is required to exhaust administrative remedies if that denial actually

occurs.

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
- Text79: 
    - Text80: 
    - Text81: 
    - Text82: 
    - Text83: 
    - Text84: 
    - Text85: 
    - Text86: 
    - Text87: 
    - Text88: 
    - Text89: