alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5173 

To include Portugal in the list of foreign states whose nationals are eligible 

for admission into the United States as E–1 and E–2 nonimmigrants 

if United States nationals are treated similarly by the Government of 

Portugal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2018 

Mr. CICILLINE (for himself, Mr. VALADAO, and Mr. COSTA) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To include Portugal in the list of foreign states whose nationals are eligible for admission into the United States 

as E–1 and E–2 nonimmigrants if United States nationals are treated similarly by the Government of Portugal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advancing Mutual In5 terests and Growing our Success Act’’ or the ‘‘AMIGOS 

6 Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 5173 IH

1 SEC. 2. NONIMMIGRANT TRADERS AND INVESTORS. 

2 For purposes of clauses (i) and (ii) of section 

3 101(a)(15)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

4 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(E)), Portugal shall be considered to 

5 be a foreign state described in such section if the Govern6 ment of Portugal provides similar nonimmigrant status to 

7 nationals of the United States. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ALBERT MULBERRY, JR,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00132-MP -GRJ

SECRETARY,

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 22, Respondent’s fifth motion for an

extension of time until March 7, 2011, to respond to the Petition due to exigent

circumstances. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

1. That the motion, Doc. 22, is GRANTED. Respondent shall respond to the

Petition on or before March 7, 2011.

2. Petitioner shall have until April 6, 2011, to file a reply, if any.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8 day of February 2011. 

th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2128 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2128

To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the 
  means-test presumption of abuse under chapter 7 of title 11, United 
  States Code, qualifying members of reserve components of the Armed 
Forces and members of the National Guard who, after September 11, 2001, 
are called to active duty or to perform a homeland defense activity for 
                         not less than 90 days.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 2019

 Mr. Graham (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Tillis, Ms. Hirono, Mr. 
  Cornyn, Mr. Durbin, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Ernst, Ms. 
 Klobuchar, and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To exempt for an additional 4-year period, from the application of the 
  means-test presumption of abuse under chapter 7 of title 11, United 
  States Code, qualifying members of reserve components of the Armed 
Forces and members of the National Guard who, after September 11, 2001, 
are called to active duty or to perform a homeland defense activity for 
                         not less than 90 days.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Guard and Reservists Debt 
Relief Extension Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVISTS DEBT RELIEF AMENDMENT.

    Section 4(b) of the National Guard and Reservists Debt Relief Act 
of 2008 (11 U.S.C. 707 note; Public Law 110-438) is amended by striking 
``11-year'' and inserting ``15-year''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, Kenneth T. Coviello, the Chief Executive Officer of
                  VYCOR MEDICAL. INC. (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that: 1. The Company's Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
                  quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the "Report"), fully complies with
                  the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934; and 2. Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
                  of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this
                  2nd day of September 2011. /s/Kenneth T. Coviello-------------------Kenneth T. CovielloPrincipal Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
                  has been provided to Vycor Medical, Inc. and will be retained by
                  Vycor Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
                  Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 60372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5251]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD

Reestablishment of FASAB Charter

    Board Action: Pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, and the FASAB Rules of 
Procedure, as amended in April, 2004, notice is hereby given that under 
the authority and in furtherance of the objectives of 31 U.S.C. 
3511(d), the Secretary of the Treasury, the Director of OMB, the 
Director of CBO, and the Comptroller General (the Sponsors) have 
established and agreed to continue an advisory committee to consider 
and recommend accounting standards and principles for the federal 
government.
    For Further Information, or To Obtain a Copy of the Charter, 
Contact: Wendy M. Payne, Executive Director, 441 G St., NW., Mail Stop 
6K17V, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

    Authority: Federal Advisory Committee Act. 31 U.S.C. 3511(D), 
Pub. L. 92-463.

    Dated: October 19, 2007.
Wendy M. Payne,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 07-5251 Filed 10-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-01-M
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED March 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40956 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAFAEL BETANCOURT-GUILLEN, also known as Miguel Cervantes, also known as Juan Jose Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-558-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rafael Betancourt-Guillen raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Case 7:07-cv-03395-KMK-LMS     Document 15      Filed 03/10/2008     Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:10-CR-27-SPM/GRJ

CARLINE CENEUS, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

PROTECTIVE ORDER

The Government has consented to disclosure of the grand jury transcripts

and exhibits in the above styled case under certain conditions. Good cause

having been found, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Disclosure shall be limited to each defense attorney of record and

to any attorney, paralegal, investigator, or support staff in that

attorney's office who is directly involved in the defense of this case.

2. Defense counsel may provide defendants the opportunity to review

said grand jury transcripts for the limited purpose of assisting in the

defense of the case. Defense counsel shall not, under any

circumstances provide defendants with copies of said transcripts.

3. Defense counsel shall not discuss the contents of the grand jury

Case 1:10-cr-00027-SPM-GRJ Document 167 Filed 11/15/11 Page 1 of 2
transcripts and respective exhibits with anyone except for their

clients, attorneys for the government, defense counsel of record for

the co-defendants, and any attorneys, paralegals, investigators, or

support staff in their office directly involved in the defense of this

case.

4. Defendants shall not discuss the contents of the grand jury

transcripts or exhibits with anyone other than with their attorneys.

5. Defendants shall not use the grand jury transcripts, exhibits or any

information contained therein, except in the defense of the pending

charges.

6. Any subsequent defense motions referencing or discussing any

grand jury transcripts, exhibits or content shall be filed under seal.

7. If either party seeks a modification of this order, the moving party

must seek permission of this Court pursuant to a motion filed 

under seal.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th of November, 2011.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

-2-

Case 1:10-cr-00027-SPM-GRJ Document 167 Filed 11/15/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009208EN.01000401.xml

| 3.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 208/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 208/4

---

Special Report No 7/2009 ‘The management of the Galileo programme’s development and validation phase’

2009/C 208/04

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 7/2009 ‘The management of the Galileo programme’s development and validation phase’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form at EU-Bookshop.

---
# C_2009263EN.01001901.xml

| 5.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/19

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to open winding-up proceedings against Yeniki Enosi Anonimi Elliniki Eteria Yenikon Asfalion

(Publication pursuant to Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

(Publication pursuant to Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

2009/C 263/08

| Insurance undertaking | Yeniki Enosi Anonimi Elliniki Eteria Yenikon Asfalion, head office in Piraeus, odos Papastratou 51-53 and Dervenakion, GREECE. |
| --- | --- |
| Date, entry into force and type of decision | Decision No 156 of the Board of Directors of the Private Insurance Supervisory Committee of 16 and 21 September 2009 relating to the definitive withdrawal of the company's operating licence and its winding-up.
  Entry into force: 21 September 2009. |
| Competent authorities | Private Insurance Supervisory Committee |
| Ipatias 5 |
| 105 57 Athens |
| GREECE |

Insurance undertaking

Yeniki Enosi Anonimi Elliniki Eteria Yenikon Asfalion, head office in Piraeus, odos Papastratou 51-53 and Dervenakion, GREECE.

Date, entry into force and type of decision

Decision No 156 of the Board of Directors of the Private Insurance Supervisory Committee of 16 and 21 September 2009 relating to the definitive withdrawal of the company's operating licence and its winding-up.

Entry into force: 21 September 2009.

Competent authorities

Private Insurance Supervisory Committee

Ipatias 5

105 57 Athens

GREECE

Supervisory authorities

| Private Insurance Supervisory Committee |
| --- |
| Ipatias 5 |
| 105 57 Athens |
| GREECE |

Private Insurance Supervisory Committee

Ipatias 5

105 57 Athens

GREECE

Appointed liquidator

| Persefoni Bouna (winding-up supervisor) |
| --- |
| Lawyer in Athens |
| Promitheos 5 |
| Haidari |
| 105 57 Attica |
| GREECE |

Persefoni Bouna (winding-up supervisor)

Lawyer in Athens

Promitheos 5

Haidari

105 57 Attica

GREECE

Applicable law

Greek law; Articles 3(3), 7 to 9, 10, 12(a) and 17(a) to 17(c) of Legislative Decree No 400/1970.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SYLVIA ARDLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09cv185/MP/GRJ

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 406(b)(1). (Doc. 32). The Commissioner has filed a response (doc. 34) indicating

that he does not contest payment of attorney fees in this case in the total amount of

$20,213.78. Although the amount is uncontested, the court must still make an

independent determination of the reasonableness of any fee awarded pursuant to §

406(b). See Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807-08, 122 S. Ct. 1817, 1828 (2002)

(holding that courts may award a reasonable fee not to exceed twenty-five percent of

past-due benefits and should consider the character of the representation and the results

the representation achieved in determining the reasonableness of a contingency fee

agreement).

The court finds upon consideration of the factors cited with approval in Gisbrecht

that the requested fee award is reasonable. The representation of plaintiff in this case was

not substandard, and the attorney for plaintiff, does not appear to have been responsible

for any delays in this matter. Moreover, counsel represented plaintiff on a contingency fee

basis for an extended period of time, obtaining past-due benefits in the amount of

$84,887.52. Plaintiff's counsel states that he expended a total of 6.90 hours in 2009

Case 1:09-cv-00185-MP-GRJ Document 35 Filed 10/31/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

through 2011 representing plaintiff before this court. The twenty-five percent contingency

fee agreement yields $22,221.88, which equals an hourly rate of $3,220.56 an hour. While

the hourly rate almost certainly exceeds market rates, by working on a contingency fee

basis counsel accepted the risk of not being compensated for his efforts. As such, the

requested fee is not a windfall. Furthermore, the plaintiff has made no objection to his

attorney's fee request.

The Commissioner withheld $22,221.88 of plaintiff's past-due benefits for attorney

fees. Pursuant to the fee agreements in this case, plaintiff's counsel seeks this amount

minus $1,008.10, which has already been received by counsel pursuant to the Equal

Access to Justice Act . Thus, plaintiff's counsel seeks $20,213.78, and not the full amount

of past-due benefits withheld. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The motion for attorneys' fees (doc. 32) is GRANTED. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

406(b), plaintiff's attorney is awarded fees in the amount of $20,213.78. Defendant is

ordered to pay the fee from plaintiff's past-due benefits being held by defendant.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of October, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 1:09cv185/MP/GRJ

Case 1:09-cv-00185-MP-GRJ Document 35 Filed 10/31/11 Page 2 of 2
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 5D 2 2

- 3050 LT Case No. 2017

- CF

- 001869

- A

_____________________________
P EDRO M ELENDEZ , III,

Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County

. William S. Orth , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Joseph Chloupek, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marissa V. Giles, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

Novembe r 28, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
W ALLIS , J AY , and K ILBANE , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 242 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to release reversionary and reserved 

interests in certain land in the Coconino National Forest in the State 

of Arizona. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 28, 2019 

Ms. MCSALLY (for herself and Ms. SINEMA) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to release reversionary and reserved interests in certain land in the 

Coconino National Forest in the State of Arizona. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lowell Observatory 

5 Conveyance Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 

8 (1) OBSERVATORY.—The term ‘‘Observatory’’ 

9 means the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 242 IS

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the 

3 Chief of the Forest Service. 

4 SEC. 3. RELEASE OF REVERSIONARY AND RESERVED IN5 TERESTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

7 if the Observatory makes a written request to the Sec8 retary for conveyance of the parcel of land described in 

9 subsection (b) not later than 180 days after the date of 

10 enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall convey to the 

11 Observatory, without consideration and by quitclaim deed, 

12 all right, title, and interest of the United States in and 

13 to that parcel of land. 

14 (b) LAND DESCRIBED.—The parcel of land to be con15 veyed under subsection (a) is the National Forest System 

16 land— 

17 (1) conveyed by the United States to Percival 

18 Lowell and his heirs by the Act entitled ‘‘An Act 

19 granting certain lands in the Coconino National For20 est, in Arizona, for observatory purposes’’, approved 

21 May 30, 1910 (36 Stat. 452; chapter 261); and 

22 (2) described as sec. 17, T. 21 N., R. 7 E., of 

23 the Gila and Salt River base and meridian in 

24 Coconino County, Arizona. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
430

MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT

DISPOSITIONS

CERTIFIED QUESTIONS, CERTIFIED APPEALS,

MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS, AND OTHER MATTERS

March 28, 2013

Crimson Trace Corporation v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP (S061086). Alternative 

writ of mandamus issued.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JULIE M. QUATTLEBAUM,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv197-RH/CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DENIAL OF BENEFITS

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge=s amended report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 19. No objections have been filed. The record 

establishes that the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court=s 

opinion. The Commissioner=s decision denying the plaintiff=s application for 

disability benefits is AFFIRMED. The clerk must enter judgment and close the 

Case 5:10-cv-00197-RH-CJK Document 20 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 2
file.

SO ORDERED on September 13, 2011.

Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00197-RH-CJK Document 20 Filed 09/13/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TIMOTHY WALDEN,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv103/LAC/EMT

STATE OF FLORIDA CORP.,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated September 22, 2010 (Doc. 40). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the

objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim on which relief may be 

granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6 day of October, 2010. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 211 (Thursday, November 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 61946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration


Sunshine Act Meetings; Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board of 
Directors

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

Time and Date: December 6, 2007, 11 a.m. to 2 p.m., Eastern Daylight 
Time.

Place: These meetings will take place telephonically. Any interested 
person may call Mr. Avelino Gutierrez at (505) 827-4565 to receive the 
toll free numbers and pass codes needed to participate in these 
meetings by telephone.

Status: Open to the public.

Matters to be Considered: The Unified Carrier Registration Plan Board 
of Directors (the Board) will continue its work in developing and 
implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan and Agreement and to 
that end, may consider matters properly before the Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Avelino Gutierrez, Chair, Unified 
Carrier Registration Board of Directors at (505) 827-4565.

    Dated: October 26, 2007.
William A. Quade,
Associate Administrator for Enforcement and Program Delivery.
[FR Doc. 07-5463 Filed 10-30-07; 3:42 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P