alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-1560

___________

Ruth A. Gottman, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Commissioner of Internal Revenue *

Service, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Petition for Review of

No. 00-1561 an Order of the Commissioner

___________ of the Internal Revenue Service.

Neil E. Gottman, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Commissioner of Internal Revenue *

Service, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: August 31, 2000

 Filed: September 13, 2000

___________
1The Honorable Mary Ann Cohen, Chief Judge, United States Tax Court.

-2-

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, HANSEN, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Neil E. Gottman and Ruth A. Gottman seek review of the tax court’s1 orders

dismissing their respective petitions and entering deficiencies as determined by the

Commissioner. The Gottmans argue that requiring them to file tax returns signed under

penalty of perjury violates their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.

After reviewing the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the tax court

properly dismissed the Gottmans’ petitions for failure to state a claim. We also grant

the Commissioner’s motion for sanctions, see Fed. R. App. P. 38, because the

Gottmans’ argument on appeal has been rejected repeatedly, see, e.g., Boomer v.

United States, 755 F.2d 696, 697 (8th Cir. 1985) (per curiam); United States v.

MacLeod, 436 F.2d 947, 951 (8th Cir.) (“The statutory requirement to file an income

tax return does not violate a taxpayer’s right against self-incrimination.”), cert. denied,

402 U.S. 907 (1971).

Accordingly, we affirm the tax court’s orders, and award damages in the amount

of $500 plus costs to the Commissioner.
-3-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Plata Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the three months ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Dexter R. Caliso, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 Dated: April 25, 2011
 
 
 DEXTER R. CALISO
 Dexter R. Caliso
 Chief Executive Officer,
 President and Director
 
 
 
 -1-
#### LANE v. HONEYCUTT

No. 123 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 436.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 July 1972.
|  | (1) | The      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;    and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      May 21, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Frederick      Antonelli                                                                                                                            |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    |   | Frederick      Antonelli                                                                                                                                     |
|                    |   | Principal      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Director(Principal      Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting      Officer) |
|                    |   |                                                                                                                                                         |   |
# C_2009080EN.01001101.xml

| 3.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/11

---

Call for applications 2009

Second Programme of Community action in the field of Health (2008-2013)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 80/05

Up-dated versions of the call for proposals for operating grants, call for proposals for projects and call for proposals for joint actions documents under the call for applications ‘Health — 2009’ within the framework of the Second Programme of Community action in the field of Health (2008-2013) (1) has been published on the website of the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers at the following address:

1

http://ec.europa.eu/eahc/health/grants.html

---

(1)  Decision No 1350/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 establishing a Second Programme of Community action in the field of Health (2008-2013), OJ L 301, 20.11.2007, p. 3-13.

1

---
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of AEI Income & Growth Fund
XXII  Limited Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB  for
the  period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
XXI,  Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
XXI,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 18, 2005



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 18, 2005
#### STATE v. MILLS

No. 187 P.C.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 47.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 February 1979.
#### W. A. Ransom & Company, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*Hannah Coleman, defendant in error.

Practice in Supreme Court. From Muscogee. May Term, 1870.

Chappell *&*Russell, for plaintiff in error.

Farrow & Thomas; G. E. Thomas; Thornton & Spencer, for defendant.

When this cause was called here, counsel for plaintiff in error moved to withdraw the record. Defendant’s counsel objected, insisting that the cause should be argued and decided. As it was not to reverse a judgment for money, the Court held that it could be withdrawn, and that if it were a money judgment, plaintiff could not withdraw without defendant’s consent, as she would then have a right to have the cause heard and ask for damages for delay.
Case 1:07-cv-03513-LAP     Document 5      Filed 06/27/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03513-LAP     Document 5      Filed 06/27/2007     Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

EDDIE M. LEWIS, #154622,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv205-SPM/WCS

JACK CAMPBELL, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated August 18, 2010 (doc. 12). Plaintiff has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 12) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with
Page 2 of 2

an order and failure to prosecute. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 4:10cv205-SPM/WCS
Case 3:10-cr-00026-LC   Document 2   Filed 07/20/10   Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - 21 CFR Part 700

### CFR Correction

In Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 600 to 799, revised as of April 1, 2007, in § 700.27, on page 138, paragraph (d) is reinstated to read as follows:

§ 700.27

* * * * *

                        (d)                         *Adulteration.*                         Failure of a manufacturer or processor to operate in compliance with the requirements of paragraph (b) or (c) of this section renders a cosmetic adulterated under section 601(c) of the act.                    

[FR Doc. 07-55510 Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the quarterly Report
of Amarantus Biosciences, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gerald E. Commissiong, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and I, Marc E. Faerber, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By:    | /s/ Gerald E. Commissiong               
|------ | ----------------------------------------
|Name:  | Gerald E. Commissiong                   
|Title: | Principal Executive Officer and Director
|Date:  | August 20, 2012                         
|       |                                         
|By:    | /s/ Marc E. Faerber                     
|Name:  | Marc E. Faerber                         
|Title: | Principal Financial Officer             
|Date:  | August 20, 2012                         

























This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KARL EDWARD BRAITHWAITE,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:09cv341-WS

ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S

DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 26)

docketed October 28, 2010. The magistrate judge recommends that this case be

dismissed for the plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court. The plaintiff has

filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for the plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court.
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of November , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the amended quarterly report of Pickford Minerals, Inc. on
Form  10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Fidel Thomas, President,
Chief  Executive  Officer,  Chief  Financial  Officer  and  Principal Accounting
Officer  of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 13, 2009                         By /s/ Fidel Thomas
                                              Fidel Thomas
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              Chief Financial Officer, and
                                              Principal Accounting Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I,Anthony Hicks, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Otter Tail AgEnterprises, LLC;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofgovernors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Dated:  May 20, 2008

 
|   | /s/  Anthony Hicks       |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Anthony  Hicks           |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
# C_2009060EN.01000501.xml

| 14.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 March 2009

(2009/C 60/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2905 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,03 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4540 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,92200 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,1025 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5360 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8230 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,601 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 297,71 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7072 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4905 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2797 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2032 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9587 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6413 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0054 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4607 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9899 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 914,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,8276 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8244 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4520 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 453,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7819 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,520 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,7265 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,413 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9589 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,9445 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,4540 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2905

JPY

Japanese yen

127,03

DKK

Danish krone

7,4540

GBP

Pound sterling

0,92200

SEK

Swedish krona

11,1025

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5360

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8230

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,601

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

297,71

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7072

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4905

RON

Romanian leu

4,2797

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2032

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9587

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6413

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0054

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4607

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9899

KRW

South Korean won

1 914,39

ZAR

South African rand

12,8276

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8244

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4520

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 453,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7819

PHP

Philippine peso

62,520

RUB

Russian rouble

44,7265

THB

Thai baht

46,413

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9589

MXN

Mexican peso

18,9445

INR

Indian rupee

66,4540

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cr34-SPM

PETE CRAIG, JR.,

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One and Two of this

indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing

Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a

report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties

consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it

is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.
Page 2 of 3

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:10cr34-SPM/WCS
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on June 17, 2010. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:10cr34-SPM/WCS