alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Averox Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 13, 2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity
and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

October 13, 2009
                                            /s/ Yasser Ahmad
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Yasser Ahmad
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit
        32.2
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Royal Quantum Group, Inc. a Nevada
        corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
        2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the "Report"), Ron Ruskowsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
        to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        Royal Quantum Group, Inc., and will be retained by Royal Quantum Group, Inc.
        and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
  /s/ Ron
                RuskowskyRon
                  Ruskowsky
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
                April
                  12, 2007






1
President
      Director General


Gabon
      Telecom SA


Postal
      Station Delta


Administrative
      and Social Headquarters of Gabon


Libreville,
      Gabon











Benoit
      Laliberté


Chief
      of
      Technology


United
      American Corporation


4150
      Ste-
      Catherine St. West, suite 200


Montreal,
      Quebec


CANADA





Reference
      Number: 02101/PDG/Gabon Telecom





**Subject:
      Notification of the granting of the executive mandate for the control of all
      international telecommunications traffic, origination and
      termination.**





Sir,





In
      the
      context of securing our international origination and termination
      telecommunications traffic, we irrevocably mandate to you, for a period of
      five
      (5) years renewable upon agreement by both parties, the mandate to control
      all
      international telecommunications operations through the form of issuance of
      origination, termination and bilateral agreements.





We
      mandate to you all of the necessary power that you may require to re-align
      and
      render effective the current situation as it pertains to international
      telecommunications traffic. As such, you have the right to activate, suspend,
      interrupt or terminate all existing agreements and existing telecommunications
      traffic to the benefit of Gabon Telecom.





During
      the execution of your mandate, you will migrate in its entirety, all of the
      telecommunications traffic to a mode of prepayment as well as ensure that all
      funds of terminators doing business with Gabon Telecom, as well as bilateral
      agreements, should be collected and transferred without delay to a bank
      designated by Gabon Telecom, for the benefit of Gabon Telecom.





You
      can
      as well act in the name of Gabon Telecom to collect any outstanding debts due
      to
      this day. You are granted all of the power necessary to prevent any future
      loss
      or fraud that Gabon Telecom may be subject to currently, or in the
      future.





We
      give
      you the authorization to negotiate in the name of Gabon Telecom all commercial
      agreements for all international operators.










You
      will
      provide me with a weekly summary of activities pertaining to your progress
      in
      all of the actions associated with this mandate.





Please,
      sir, accept the assurance of my most distinguished consideration.








Paris,
      December 6, 2006





President
      Director General





/s/
      Hervé Fulgence Ossamy


Hervé
      Fulgence OSSAMY
#### GILBERT P. WELCH and husband, J. ARTHUR WELCH, Petitioners v. RUTH P. KEARNS and husband, AUSTIN F. KEARNS; A. M. PRIMM and wife, SARAH H. PRIMM; CLEO P. GREEN and husband, WALTER GREEN; RICHARD W. PRIMM and wife, GERTRUDE B. PRIMM, Defendants.

(Filed 17 January 1964.)

1. Appeal and Error § 60—

The decision on appeal becomes the law -of the case.

2. Partition § 9—

The amount of commission allowed by tbe -Superior Oo-urt to tbe commissioner selling lands for partition is governed by G.S. 1-408 and rests in tbe discretion of tbe court, and the court’s order will not be disturbed in tbe absence of a showing of abuse of discretion.

3. Appeal and Error § 46—

Tbe action of tbe trial court as to matters within its judicial discretion will not be disturbed unless there is a clear abuse thereof.

Appeal by defendants from *Gambill, J.,*regular Jun-e 10, 1963, Session, DavidsoN Superior Court.

This proceeding was here at the Spring Term, 1963. The Court remanded with -direction that the Superior Court Judge fix the amount *172to be paid' to M. E. Gilliam, as Commissioner, for hiis services in the proceeding. In a *de novo*hearing, Judge Gambih found $5,500.00 to ■be reasonable compensation and ordered payment from the proceeds of the sale. The 'defendants Kearns and Green excepted 'and appealed.

*W. H. Steed for defendant appellants.*

*E. W. Hooper, Fred H. Morrison, Jr., for M. E. Gilliam, Commissioner, appellee.*

Higgins, J.

The facts are fully set forth by 'the Chief Justice. See 259 N.C. 367. In the first instance -the Clerk Superior Court had awarded the Commissioner $7,000.00 for his services. On appeal, the Superior Court Judge concluded as a matter of law that commissions were governed 'by G.S. 28-170, could not exceed five per cent, and reduced the 'allowance to- $3,500.00. The Commissioner appealed.

This Court held that G.S. 1-408 — not G.S. 28-170 — controlled, and remanded the proceeding for trial *de novo*before the judge holding the Superior Court of Davidson County. That decision is the law of tire case. When Judge Gambill, on the *de novo*hearing, in his discretion, fixed $5,'500.00 as just and reasonable compensation, his decision can only be set aside for abuse of discretion. “The rule is universal that the 'action of the 'trial court ais to matters within its judicial discretion will not 'be disturbed unless there is ia clear abuse thereof; or, as it is frequently stated, the appellate court will not review the discretion of the trial court. This rule, or rather this statement of the rule, does not give the -trial judge 'am entirely free hand in what might be termed discretionary matter®. The exercise of judicial discretion which may not be reviewed implies conscientious judgment, not arbitrary action, takas account of tire law and the particular circumstances of the case, 'and is directed by the reason and conscience of the judge toward a just result." 3 Am. Jur., Appeal and Eirror, § 959.

The judgment 'challenged by this appeal is

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Asia4sale.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Montandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

January 27, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of League Now Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31,
2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kenneth C. Wiedrich, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                            
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the
        financial condition and result of operations
        of the Company.



|/s/
    Kenneth C. Wiedrich | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Kenneth C. Wiedrich         | 
|Chief Financial Officer     | 
|May 16, 2013                | 



A signed original of this certification
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WILLIAM DEYESSO,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00061-MP -GRJ

HUNTER MARINE CORPORATION,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 33, Motion to Dismiss by Hunter Marine

Corporation. The parties have executed a settlement agreement dated November 18, 2010, and

jointly ask this Court for a final order dismissing the case with prejudice, each party to bear its

own costs and fees. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 33, is GRANTED. 

2. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own costs

and fees. 

3. This Court retains jurisdiction until February 18, 2011 to ensure the settlement is

properly effected. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of December, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FRANKLIN BLUNT
, Defendant Below, Appellant,

v.
STATE OF DELAWARE,
Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § No. 709, 2014 § § § Court Below

— Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, § in and for Kent County § Cr. ID No. 130 9007699 § § §

Submitted: May 6 , 2015 Decided: June 4, 2015

Before HOLLAND
, VALIHURA , and SEITZ
, Justices.

O R D E R

This 4 th day of June , upon consideration of the appellant’ s Supreme Court
Rule 26(c) brief, the State’ s response , and the record below, it appears to the Court

that:
(1) On July 1 , 2014, a Superior Court jury found the appellant, Franklin

Blunt
, not guilty of Attempted Escape in the Second Degree and guilty of
Attempting to Remove a Firearm from the Possession of a Law Enforcement

Officer

. Blunt was sentenced to fifteen years of Level V incarceration, suspended
after two years for one year of Level III probation

. This is Blunt’s direct appeal.
(2) On appeal, Blunt’s counsel (“Counsel”) filed a brief and a motio n to

withdraw under Supreme Court Rule 26(c) (“Rule 26(c)”)

. C ounsel asserts that,2

based upon a complete and careful examination of the record, there are no arguably
appealable issues. Counsel informed Blunt of the provisions of Rule 26(c) and
provided Blunt with a copy of the motion to withdraw and the accompanying brief.
(3) Counsel also informed Blunt of his right to identify any points he
wished this Court to consider on appeal

. Counsel initially informed Blunt that he
had to deliver any points within fourteen days
, instead of thirty days as set forth in

S upreme Court Rule 26(c)(i)(B) , and Blunt did not submit any points. Counsel
met with Blunt again to make certain that Blunt did not intend to submit any points

and B lunt still has not identified any points for this Court to consider

. The State
has responded to the Rule 26(c) brief and mov ed to affirm the Superior Court’ s judgment.
(4) When reviewing a motion to withdraw and an accompanying brief
under Rule 26(c) , this Court must: (i ) be satisfied that defense counsel has made a

conscientious examination of the record and the law for arguable claims; and (ii )
must conduct its own review of the record and determine whether the appeal is so
totally devoid of at least arguably appealable issues that it can be decided without
an adversary presentation. 1

(5) This Court has reviewed the record carefully and has concluded that

the Blunt’s appeal is wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable

1 Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988); Leacock v. State , 690 A.2d 926, 927

- 28 (Del. 1996)

.3

issue. We also are satisfied that Blunt ’ s counsel has made a conscientious effort to
examine the record and the law and has properly determined that Blunt could not
raise a meritorious claim in this appeal.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED. The motion to withdraw is moot.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice
Case 1:06-cv-14982-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Welton VAN HOOK, Appellant, v. R. L. EKLUND, Superintendent of the California Prison at Chino, California, Appellee.

No. 19998.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 5, 1965.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 24, 1965.

Welton Van Hook, in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, Wm. E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen. of California, George J. Roth, Deputy Atty. Gen. of California, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, HAMLIN and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, without argument;

On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause be, and is hereby, affirmed.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2176 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to designate Haiti for 

temporary protected status. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to designate 

Haiti for temporary protected status. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HAITI FOR TEMPORARY PRO4 TECTED STATUS. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec6 retary of Homeland Security shall designate Haiti for tem7 porary protected status for a period of 18 months begin8 ning on July 22, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 203 (Monday, October 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 59539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5194]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel, Drug Development in Alcoholism.
    Date: November 19, 2007.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Beata Buzas, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Institute On Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 
National Institute of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm 3041, Rockville, 
MD 20852, 301-443-0800, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2a48485f504b596a474b434604444342044d455c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99fbfbece3f8ead9f4f8f0f5b7f7f0f1b7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: October 12, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5194 Filed 10-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MARK STIMUS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv63/RS-MD

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15). 

Plaintiff has not filed objections.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice because of Plaintiff’s failure to

prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

 

ORDERED on July 19, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 20-11 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 16 of 16
**Exhibit
      32.1**






**Certification
      Pursuant to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jie Su, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








April
      12,
      2007


GFR
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.





*/s/
      Jie Su*


Jie
      Su,
      Chief Executive Officer