alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)



I, Richard R. Walters, President and Acting Chief Financial Officer of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, certify that:



1.

This quarterly report for the period ended June 30, 2003 on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company.



/s/ Richard R. Walters



DATE:  August 08, 2003

Richard R. Walters, President and

Acting Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                         252,266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                    164,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               508,698
<PP&E>                                          78,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,624,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          584,424
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,832
<OTHER-SE>                                     972,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,624,500
<SALES>                                        921,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               921,381
<CGS>                                          448,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,525,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,056,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,056,964)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,056,964)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order

May 30, 2007

133215 133216 133217 133218

JUDY A. LONG, Personal Representative of the Estate of James E. Long, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v

DR. FOLAYAN GOODSON, HENRY FORD MEDICAL CENTER, and HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendants-Appellants,

and

BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL, DANIEL L. RICHARDSON, D.O., DR. PENNINGTON, ROBERT BRECKENFELD, D. O., DR. ANDREW HANS RIKKERS, DR. MAUREEN NELSON, DR. JENNINGS, SANFORD SKLAR, and EARL T. HECKER, D.O. Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/ Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

SC: 133215-133218 COA: 261049-261052 Wayne CC: 03-330994-NH

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Mullins v St Joseph Mercy Hosp (Docket No. 131879) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in th at case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the app lication be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

l0521 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2007

Clerk
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

M&M Elevator Company, Ltd., * From the 244th District

 Court of Ector County,

 Trial Court No. C-128,532.

Vs. No. 11-13-00035-CV * September 26, 2013

Eliazar Trevino, Jr., individually and as * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

next friend of Eliazar Trevino, III, (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Lailyana Trevino, and Urijah Trevino, McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

 This court has considered M&M Elevator Company, Ltd.’s unopposed motion 

to dismiss this appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, 

in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred 

by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring the same.
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 3 of 3
```

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Clean Water Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-ksb for the period ended June 27, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Clean Water Technologies, Inc.
/s/ Laurie C. Scala
-----------------------------
    Laurie C. Scala, President
    and Chief Financial Officer

September 22, 2003
```
EXHIBIT 31.1I, Christopher H. Hopkins, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Oilsands Quest Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andhave: (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  (b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions containedin SEC Release 34-47986]  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors; (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.July 30, 2007   /s/ Christopher H. Hopkins   Christopher H. Hopkins, Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1
                                                                    ------------


                          FOX FAMILY WORLDWIDE, INC.


                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             YEARS ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      1997             1998              1999              2000            2001
                                                    ------------   --------------     -------------    -------------    ------------
<S>                                                <C>             <C>               <C>                <C>               <C>
FIXED CHARGES
  Interest Expense, Net of Capitalized Interest     $ 1,938,000      $131,552,000      $164,669,000      $164,992,000   $164,567,000
  Interest Capitalized During the Period              1,923,000         4,328,000         4,438,000         3,423,000      7,451,000
  Amortization of Debt Issue Costs                      288,000         2,453,000         3,253,000         3,250,000      3,269,000
  Portion of Rent Expense Considered Interest         1,411,000         3,308,000         3,527,000         4,064,000      4,452,000
                                                    -----------      ------------      ------------      ------------   ------------
                                                      5,560,000       141,641,000       175,887,000       175,729,000    179,739,000


EARNINGS
  Income from Continuing Operations Before Income
     Taxes                                          $55,007,000      $(21,327,000)     $(64,410,000)     $138,544,000  $(25,726,000)
  Fixed Charges, Less Capitalized Interest            3,637,000       137,312,000       171,449,000       172,306,000   172,288,000
                                                    -----------      ------------      ------------      ------------  -------------
                                                     58,644,000       115,985,000       107,039,000       310,850,000   146,562,000




RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                         11:1                --                --               2:1            --

EARNINGS DEFICIENCY                                 $        --      $(25,656,000)     $(68,848,000)     $         --  $(33,177,000)
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 208 (Monday, October 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 61204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5320]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Fifteenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 207/Airport Security 
Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 207 Meeting, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 207, Airport Security Access Control 
Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 16, 2007 from 9:30 a.m.-4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., Conference Rooms, 
1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 207 meeting. The agenda will 
include:

<bullet> November 16:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary Session (Welcome, Introductions, and 
Administrative Remarks).
    <bullet> Review of Meeting Summary.
    <bullet> Review of Workgroup Leaders Meetings.
    <bullet> Workgroups Reports.
    <bullet> Workgroup 2: Introduction.
    <bullet> Workgroup 3: Local Identity Management System.
    <bullet> Workgroup 4: Physical Access Control.
    <bullet> Workgroup 5: Intrusion Detection Systems.
    <bullet> Workgroup 6: Video Systems.
    <bullet> Workgroup 7: Security Operating Center.
    <bullet> Workgroup 8: Communications Infrastructure.
    <bullet> Workgroup 9: General Considerations.
    <bullet> Workgroup 10: Appendices.
    <bullet> Closing Plenary Session (Other Business, Establish Agenda, 
Date and Place of Following Meetings).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 22, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-5320 Filed 10-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### IN RE ANNEXATION ORDINANCE

No. 3 PC.

No. 111 (Spring Term).

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 274.

Petition by citizens and residents of Stanly County for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 March 1980.
# C_2009110EN.01000401.xml

| 14.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 110/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 110/4

---

Call addressed to individuals for the establishment of a database of prospective independent experts to assist the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) with tasks in connection with the evaluation and implementation of Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 110/05

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call addressed to individuals for the establishment of a database of prospective independent experts to assist the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) with tasks in connection with the evaluation and implementation of Knowledge and Innovation Communities (KICs).

The EIT invites applications from individuals with a high level of professional experience in one or more of the following areas of expertise:

| — | Sustainable energy |
| --- | --- |

—

Sustainable energy

| — | Climate change mitigation and adaption |
| --- | --- |

—

Climate change mitigation and adaption

| — | Future information and communication society |
| --- | --- |

—

Future information and communication society

| — | Management of innovative business |
| --- | --- |

—

Management of innovative business

| — | Integration within the innovation chain |
| --- | --- |

—

Integration within the innovation chain

| — | Creation of SMEs, start-ups and spin-offs |
| --- | --- |

—

Creation of SMEs, start-ups and spin-offs

| — | Management and organisation of international venture |
| --- | --- |

—

Management and organisation of international venture

| — | Management of innovation |
| --- | --- |

—

Management of innovation

| — | IPR and patenting |
| --- | --- |

—

IPR and patenting

| — | Research |
| --- | --- |

—

Research

| — | Non-technological research |
| --- | --- |

—

Non-technological research

| — | Innovation in higher education |
| --- | --- |

—

Innovation in higher education

| — | Innovative/entrepreneurial business education |
| --- | --- |

—

Innovative/entrepreneurial business education

| — | Environmental impact assessment |
| --- | --- |

—

Environmental impact assessment

| — | Economic/social impact assessment |
| --- | --- |

—

Economic/social impact assessment

| — | Business and financial planning |
| --- | --- |

—

Business and financial planning

| — | Performance measurement and analysis |
| --- | --- |

—

Performance measurement and analysis

| — | Investment and financing |
| --- | --- |

—

Investment and financing

| — | Risk reward strategies |
| --- | --- |

—

Risk reward strategies

| — | Knowledge transfer |
| --- | --- |

—

Knowledge transfer

Information on the modalities of the call, the conditions of appointment and guidance for applicants on how to register is available through the Experts page of the EIT website: http://eit.europa.eu

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

LAMAR PLAYER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00105-MP-AK

SECRETARY, 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

On June 24, 2010, the Court directed Petitioner to file an amended petition and to either

pay the $5.00 habeas corpus filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed as a pauper. Doc. 7. 

The Court advised Petitioner that failure to comply with the order by July 26, 2010, could result

in the dismissal of this case for failure to comply with an order of the Court and failure to

prosecute. As of the date of this order, Petitioner has neither complied with the order nor shown

any cause as to why he is unable to comply. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

That this case is DISMISSED for failure to comply with an order of the court and failure

to prosecute. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing this case with prejudice,

terminate any pending motions, and close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this ___3rday of August, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

BOBBY E. SOLOMON, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 1:09CV183-MMP/AK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff brings this cause pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review

of the administrative denial of his application for disability insurance benefits under Title

II of the Social Security Act. (Doc. 2). Defendant has moved to remand this matter to

the Commissioner under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) which provides that:

The court may, on motion of the Commissioner of Social Security made

for good cause shown before the Commissioner files the Commissioner’s

answer, remand the case to the Commissioner of Social Security for

further action by the Commissioner of Social Security...

The complaint in this cause was filed on August 26, 2009, and the 

Commissioner was served on August 31, 2009, but no answer has been filed. 

Defendant moves to remand this action because the administrative hearing tape cannot

be transcribed. (Doc. 6). Plaintiff has no objection to the motion to remand.
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that Defendant’s motion to remand (doc. 6)

be GRANTED, and this cause is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner under

sentence six for further proceedings by the Appeals Council. The parties are directed to

file a Status Report on or before February 19, 2010, advising the Court of the status of

the administrative proceedings and every ninety days thereafter until the administrative

proceedings are concluded.

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 19th day of November, 2009.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 10 days after

being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of

review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

No. 1:09cv183-MMP/AK
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER DOUGAN, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:09cv173-MP-GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPT. OF 

CORRECTIONS, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated August 15, 2012. (Doc. 25). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED and a certificate of

appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254

Cases in the U.S. District Courts.

DONE and ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00173-MP-GRJ Document 26 Filed 09/17/12 Page 1 of 1