alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011083EN.01000601.xml

| 17.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/6

---

Communication from the Commission in pursuance of Article 4 of Directive 2000/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on summer-time arrangements (1)

1

Schedule for the summer-time period

2011/C 83/06

For 2012-2016 inclusive, the summer-time periods will begin and end respectively on the following dates at 1.00 a.m. UTC — Coordinated Universal Time:

| — | in 2012: the Sundays of 25 March and 28 October, |
| --- | --- |

—

in 2012: the Sundays of 25 March and 28 October,

| — | in 2013: the Sundays of 31 March and 27 October, |
| --- | --- |

—

in 2013: the Sundays of 31 March and 27 October,

| — | in 2014: the Sundays of 30 March and 26 October, |
| --- | --- |

—

in 2014: the Sundays of 30 March and 26 October,

| — | in 2015: the Sundays of 29 March and 25 October, |
| --- | --- |

—

in 2015: the Sundays of 29 March and 25 October,

| — | in 2016: the Sundays of 27 March and 30 October. |
| --- | --- |

—

in 2016: the Sundays of 27 March and 30 October.

---

(1)  OJ L 31, 2.2.2001, p. 21.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 23**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-88842 of OhioLegacy Corp on Form S-8 related to the Ohio Legacy Omnibus Stock Option, Stock Ownership and LongTerm Incentive Plan, of our report dated March 14, 2007, relating to the consolidated balancesheets of Ohio Legacy Corp as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidatedstatements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended,which is included in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Ohio Legacy Corp.Crowe Chizek and Company LLCCleveland, Ohio
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BENJAMIN N. MOOTS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv98-SPM/WCS

WALTER A. MCNEIL, et al.,

 

Defendant,

________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 20) dated April 20, 2010. Plaintiff has

filed objections (doc. 22) pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). Having considered the report and recommendation and the

objections, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted. Mammography and ultrasound tests have been conducted to

determine that no cancerous tissue is present and Plaintiff has been given

ibuprofen for pain. Although Plaintiff disagrees with the treatment provided, he

has not demonstrated deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 20) is
Page 2 of 2

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (doc. 16) is dismissed for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2).

3. The clerk shall note on the docket that this case was dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of June, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 4:10cv98-SPM/WCS
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9-9 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9-9 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9-9 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2220 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2220

 To modify the exemption for trade secrets and commercial or financial 
 information in the Freedom of Information Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2019

 Mr. Grassley (for himself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Cornyn, and Mrs. Feinstein) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To modify the exemption for trade secrets and commercial or financial 
 information in the Freedom of Information Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Open and Responsive Government Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT.

    Section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly known as the 
``Freedom of Information Act'') is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(4), by inserting before the semicolon 
        at the end the following: ``, provided that the term 
        `confidential' means information that, if disclosed, would 
        likely cause substantial harm to the competitive position of 
        the person from whom the information was obtained''; and
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking ``This section does not authorize 
                withholding of information'' and inserting ``This 
                section--
            ``(1) does not authorize the withholding of information'';
                    (B) in paragraph (1), as so designated, by striking 
                ``. This section is not authority to withhold 
                information from Congress.'' and inserting a semicolon; 
                and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) does not authorize the withholding of a portion of an 
        otherwise responsive record on the basis that the portion is 
        non-responsive; and
            ``(3) is not authority to withhold information from 
        Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           Consolidated Subsidiaries
                              As of March 31, 2002

Infonet Consulting Services Australia Pty. Ltd.                  Australia
Infonet Belgium S.A.                                             Belgium
Infonet N.V./S.A.                                                Belgium
Infonet Services Canada, Inc.                                    Canada
Infonet China Limited                                            China
ESG Communications Incorporated                                  Delaware
IINS, Inc.                                                       Delaware
Infonet Broadband Services Corporation                           Delaware
Infonet Consulting Services, Inc.                                Delaware
Infonet Corporation                                              Delaware
Infonet Global Corporation                                       Delaware
Infonet Government Services, Inc.                                Delaware
Infonet Private Networking Corporation                           Delaware
Infonet Telecommunications Corporation                           Delaware
Infonet USA Corporation                                          Delaware
International Information Services, Inc.                         Delaware
Networks Telephony Corporation                                   Delaware
Infonet France, S.A.                                             France
Infonet Italia S.p.A.                                            Italy
Infonet Luxembourg S.A.                                          Luxembourg
Infonet Servicios de Communicaciones, S.A. de C.V.               Mexico
Infocom Telecom LLC                                              Russia
InfoServAsia Pte. Ltd.                                           Singapore
Infonet Taiwan Co., Ltd.                                         Taiwan
Infonet Telekomunikasyon Hizmetleri A.S.                         Turkey
IBSC Limited                                                     UK
Infonet Consulting Services UK Ltd.                              UK
Infonet Software Solutions UK Limited                            UK
Infonet UK Ltd.                                                  UK
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6581

JULIUS S. BAKER, SR., Reverend,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

M. J. GLOVER, Police Officer of the City of

Columbia; NFN AUSTIN, Chief of Police; JAMES

MCCAULLEY, Director of the Richland County

Detention Center,

Defendants- Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-825-3-17BC)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 15, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julius S. Baker, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Julius S. Baker, Sr., appeals from the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Baker v. Glover, No. CA-98-825-3-17BC (D.S.C. April 14, 1998). We

deny Baker’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 27.1

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                         859,691
<SECURITIES>                                 3,000,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  136,631
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (36,343)
<INVENTORY>                                     42,087
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,049,206
<PP&E>                                       2,921,801
<DEPRECIATION>                                 797,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,231,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,610,933
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,696,819
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,846,132)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,231,243
<SALES>                                      2,064,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,064,304
<CGS>                                        1,403,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,533,870
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             222,386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,691,952)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,691,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,691,952)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)





</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1] 

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of BIMS Renewable Energy, Inc. (n/k/a Tung Ding Resources, Inc.), because it has not filed a periodic report since the period ended June 30, 2004. 

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed company. 

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on November 1, 2007 through 11:59 p.m. EST on November 14, 2007. 

By the Commission. 

Jill M. Peterson, 

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-5519 Filed 11-1-07; 10:37 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILLIE PAUL CURRY,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00071-WS -GRJ

WALTER A MCNEIL,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, a prisoner in the custody of the Florida Department of Corrections,

initiated this case by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (Doc. 1). The case is presently before the Court on Petitioner’s notice of

voluntary dismissal. Doc. 23. Because it was unclear whether Petitioner was aware of

the consequences of voluntarily dismissing the petition, the Court directed Petitioner to

file a notice stating that he understands that any subsequently-filed federal habeas

petition may be time-barred if the instant petition is dismissed See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d)(1); Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167, 181-82 (2001) (application for federal

habeas corpus relief does not toll the one-year limitation period under § 2244(d)(2)). 

Petitioner has now filed a notice acknowledging that he is aware of the consequences

of dismissing his petition. Doc. 26.

Accordingly, pursuant to Petitioner’s notice of voluntary dismissal, Doc. 23, and
Page 2 of 2

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be

DISMISSED without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS this 5 day of October 2010. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2), a party may file specific, written

objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within 14 days after

being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may

respond to another party’s objections within 14 days after being served with

a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No: 4:10-cv-00071-WS -AK
# C_2011079EN.01002001.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/20

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2011/C 79/09

1.   The European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below, as provided for in Article 2 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 of 19 January 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States of America (1).

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (3).

3

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ethanolamines | USA | Anti-dumping duty | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 (OJ L 17, 22.1.2010, p. 1) | 23.1.2012 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Ethanolamines

USA

Anti-dumping duty

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 (OJ L 17, 22.1.2010, p. 1)

23.1.2012

---

(1)  OJ L 17, 22.1.2010, p. 1.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

3

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No. 3:10cr9/MCR

JAMES W. POPPE

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreements pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, the plea of guilty

of the Defendant, JAMES W. POPPE, to Count I of the Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. 

All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of February, 2010. 

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### UTILITIES COMMISSION v. PETROLEUM CARRIERS

No. 53 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 554.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 April 1972.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board 

      ( print page 72692)    
The Surface Transportation Board has received a request from Covington & Burling on behalf of Union Pacific Corporation (WB468-7-11/23/05), for permission to use certain data from the Board's Carload Waybill Samples. A copy of the request may be obtained from the Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration. 

The waybill sample contains confidential railroad and shipper data; therefore, if any parties object to these requests, they should file their objections with the Director of the Board's Office of Economics, Environmental Analysis, and Administration within 14 calendar days of the date of this notice. The rules for release of waybill data are codified at 49 CFR 1244.9. 

*Contact:*                     Mac Frampton, (202) 565-1541.                 

Vernon A. Williams, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 05-23617 Filed 12-5-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
## ORDER OF MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PANEL

Order Pronounced April 16, 2008

08-0142 IN RE DELTA LLOYDS IN SURANCE COMPANY OF HOUSTON,

TEXAS

- consolidated with -

08-0208 IN RE HURRICANE RI TA HOMEOWNERS' CLAIMS

Pursuant to Rule 13.3(j) counsel for movant is ordered to file with the clerk, by 5:00 p.m. on April 23, copies of the following documen ts: (1) the Requests for Production and Interrogatories to Delta Lloyds (No. 08-0142) and (2) the pe titions and the Requests for Production and Interrogatories to the insura nce companies in the Hurricane Rita cases (No. 08-0208).
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 24-6 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 13 of 13
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 13, 2015

No. 04-14-00750-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF W.M.T.K.,

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-0141-CV

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due January 7, 2015. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of 

time was filed.

We therefore order appellant, Lucas James Knight, to file, by January 23, 2015, his 

appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief. 

If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we will dismiss the 

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a). 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court