alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           885,055
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      65,626
<MORTGAGE>                                     223,351
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   32,447
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,323,438
<CASH>                                          16,919
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             270,072
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         299,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,393,971
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,285,471
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  30,574
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           25,143
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                251,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     20,387
<COMMON>                                        95,427
<OTHER-SE>                                     431,676
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,393,971
<PREMIUMS>                                     190,008
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             72,952
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              (8,368)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 164,783
<BENEFITS>                                      99,488
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     32,295
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           109,369
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,859
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,796
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,796
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.65
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 4 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 5 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 6 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 7 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 8 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 9 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 10 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 11 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 12 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 13 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 14 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 15 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 16 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 17 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 18 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 19 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 20 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 21 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 22 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 23 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 24 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 25 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 26 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 27 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 28 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 29 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 30 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 31 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 32 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 33 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 34 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 35 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 36 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 37 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 38 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 39 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 40 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 41 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 42 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 43 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 44 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 80 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 45 of 45
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v CASE NO. 3:10cr40/MCR

CALEB ANDREW GLOVER

___________________________

JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL ON JURY VERDICT

Based on the jury’s verdict of not guilty as to this defendant on Count Four

following a trial on August 4, 2010, the defendant CALEB ANDREW is hereby

ADJUDGED NOT GUILTY of the charge in Count Four and this charge is DISMISSED.

DONE and ORDERED at Pensacola, Florida, this 11th day of August, 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITES STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10-CR-34-SPM/WCS-1

PETE CRAIG, JR.,

 

Defendant.

 /

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation (doc. 36) of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of

the Defendant, PETE CRAIG, JR., to Counts One and Two of the Indictment is hereby

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-eighth day of June, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
# C_2011206EN.01001801.xml

| 12.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/18

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2011/C 206/10

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no request for a review of the measures was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (2) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.

2

The partial interim reviews which were initiated pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 in order to examine the level of injury (3) and the form and level of the measures (4) are terminated accordingly.

3

4

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (5) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Potassium chloride | Belarus
  Russia | Anti-dumping duty
  Undertaking
  Management system of the quantitative ceiling | Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2006 (OJ L 191, 12.7.2006, p. 1)
  Commission Decision 2005/802/EC as last amended by Commission Decision 2006/557/EC (OJ L 218, 9.8.2006, p. 22)
  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1818/2006 (OJ L 349, 12.12.2006, p. 3) | 13.7.2011 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (5)

5

Potassium chloride

Belarus

Russia

Anti-dumping duty

Undertaking

Management system of the quantitative ceiling

Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2006 (OJ L 191, 12.7.2006, p. 1)

Commission Decision 2005/802/EC as last amended by Commission Decision 2006/557/EC (OJ L 218, 9.8.2006, p. 22)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1818/2006 (OJ L 349, 12.12.2006, p. 3)

13.7.2011

---

(1)  OJ C 352, 23.12.2010, p. 15.

1

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

2

(3)  OJ C 323, 30.11.2010, p. 24.

3

(4)  OJ C 170, 10.6.2011, p. 10.

4

(5)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

5

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BARTHOLOMEW JONES,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv76-RH/WCS

WARDEN: MRS. IUBRE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

A complaint, doc. 1, and in forma pauperis motion, doc. 2, were received in this

Court by the Plaintiff on March 1, 2010. At the top of each document, the forms indicate

"In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia," and Plaintiff linedout the word "Middle" and wrote "Northern." Docs. 1, 2. Where the court division

should be listed, Plaintiff wrote "11th Cir." Id. Plaintiff is incarcerated in Jackson,

Georgia, and it appears that each Defendant is a prison official in State of Georgia. 

Jackson, Georgia is located in the Middle District of Georgia, and each of the

Defendants are in Georgia. Therefore, the proper forum for this action pursuant to 28
Page 2 of 2

U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 90(b) is in the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division. 

A federal district court has the authority under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to transfer a

case to another district or division "in which it could have been brought." The Court may

also raise the issue of defective venue sua sponte. Lipofsky v. New York State Workers

Comp. Bd., 861 F.2d 1257, 1259 (11th Cir. 1988) (stating "a district court may raise on

its own motion an issue of defective venue or lack of personal jurisdiction; but the court

may not dismiss without first giving the parties an opportunity to present their views on

the issue.") 

In light of the foregoing, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), it is

RECOMMENDED that this action be TRANSFERRED to the United States District

Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division, for all further proceedings.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on March 4, 2010.

 s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv76-RH/WCS
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTIF ON 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Liberty Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company. /s/ Hayne Hipp

Hayne Hipp
Chief Executive Officer
November 3, 2004
    
    /s/ Howard L. Schrott

Howard L. Schrott
Chief Financial Officer
November 3, 2004
 22
LIHIHX:I S

Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 20-7 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 3
Subject: LN-0424.0~4 rob MV Orhan Deval / Repinter Inti - CP dd 13 Apr

'06

Our Ref:LN-0424.064 Apr-24-07 13:15 Eastern Daylight Time

rob MV Orhan Deval / Repinter Inti - CP dd 13 Apr '06

folwg fm Owns:

, Qte//

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

-------------------------------- , '

WE REFERTO'CHR~RS'MSG REF NO 'TA29652d~OF TODAY ON 24TH APR 07.

FIRST OF ALL WE REMIND CHRTRSTHAT THEY ARE IN BREACH OF THE C/p SINCE

20TH APRIL 2007 DUE TO NON PAYMENT OF LAST HIRE AMOUNT OF USD

56790;92 AS PER OWNRS HIRE BREAKDOwN-DATED i~L04.2007WHICHIS FULLY IN, ,

ACCORDANCE WITH THE RELEVANT TERMS OF T?E clp. ..

ON THE OTHER HAND, DESPITE OF OWNRS ALL REMINDERS THE SUB CHRTRS AND CHRTRS

FAILED TO ORGANIZE 'THE REPAIR OF LOG DAMAGES AND CAUSED IDLE WAITING OF THE

VESSEL SINCE O~TH APRIL 2007. "

, " ",,' ' , ',,'" " " , :' "

'INTHEI~ ABOVE MENTIONED MESSAGE OF TODAY 24TH, THEY F~UND ANOTHER EXCUSE

OF "MASTER KICKED OUT ALL PARTIES OUT :OF THE VESSEL" WHILE THEY HAVE THE

RELEVANT REPORTS/CORRES iN THEIR POSSESION FROM THE NOMINATED REPAIR TEAM

BY THE SUB CHRTRS,/CHRTRS! ! "

CONSIDERING THE ABOVE MENTIONED FACTS ,AND ALSO LACK OF ABS CERTIFIED

MATERIALS BY THE CHRTRS NOMINATED REPAIR TEAM, IN ORDER TO AVOID FURTHER

DELAY AND LOSES, BEING THE RESPONSIBLE OWNERS, AFTER HAVING CHRTRS REF

MESSAGE WE HAVE IMMEDIATELYCONTACTED WITH THE LOCAL ABS OFFICE IN ALEX IN

ORDER TO GET THEIR PERMISSION FOR TEMPORARY REPAIR AND ARRANGE SAILING OF

THE VESSEL UPTO NEARBY CONVENIENT COMPETENT SHIPYARD IN BALLAST CONDITION IN

ORDER TO COMPLETE THE PERMANENT REPAIR AND LIFT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE

ABS AS THE VESSEL IS OUT OF CLASS AND THE DAMAGES ARE ALSO EFFECTING THE

VESSEL' 'S TRADING CAPABILITY. THE MIC IN THE ABS OFFICE HAS APPRECIATED

OUR SUCH INTENTION/EFFORTS AND THEY HAVE AGREED IN PRINCIPLE ON OUR ABOVE

MENTIONED PROPOSAL IF WE SUCCEED.

ACCORDINGLY, WE HAVE INSTRUCTED THE, MASTER TO START THE NECESSARY

TEMPORARY REPAIRS IMMEDIATELY BY WORKING NIGHT TIME WITH EXTRA SHIFT WITH

THEIR UTMOST EFFORTS. WE HOPE THEY WILL BE ABLE TO COMPLETE THEIR WORKS

LATEST ON 26TH APRIL 07 AND INVITE THE ABS SURVEYOR ON BOARD.

~HE ABOVE MENTIONED OPERATION IS JUST TO SHOW OUR/MASTER'S GOODWILL AGAINST

CHRTRS AND SUB CHRTRS SUCH UNACCEPTABLE ACCUSATION AND FAILURE OF THEIR

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION.

IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, WE INVITE CHRTRS TO FIND A SUITABLE DRYDOCK

EN ROUTE TO MED WITH LAYCAN 27/30 APR 2007 SUBJECT TO GET PERMISSION FROM

ABS LATEST ON 26TH APRIL 2007 AND CONFIRM BY RETURN WITH THE PAYMENTOF

UNPAID HIRE AMOUNT OF USD 56790,92 IMMY.

61211076;48 PM

Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 20-7 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 3
RGDS

OPR.

Uqte//

PIs make sure Chtrs recvd this msge in time.

Thks & B Rgds

Tolga Acar

BBT Tradeships

.Tel: 201-585-2150

~ax: 201-585-5380

-2-

Case 1:07-cv-03397-JGK Document 20-7 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 3 of 3
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Livestreams             
  -  Year In Review             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  Volunteer		 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 

## 

## Image Gallery

Search

Search

                              - Upload Date
                              - Photo Date
                              - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (0.07 MB)

Tags:

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
# United Nations Day, 2007

After World War II, representatives from around the globe gathered to begin deliberations on a new international bill of rights. The document adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, stands as a landmark achievement in the history of human liberty. On United Nations Day, we recognize the contributions of this important body and underscore our dedication to reforming the institution and advancing the high ideals on which it was founded. 

Today, the United Nations must recommit itself to maintaining international security and helping solve economic, social, and humanitarian problems. This great institution must work for great purposes: to free people from tyranny and violence, hunger and disease, illiteracy and ignorance, and poverty and despair. With renewed commitment and courage, we can pursue the vision of the Universal Declaration and build a world where people are free to speak, assemble, and worship as they wish, and where opportunity crosses every border. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 24, 2007, as United Nations Day. I urge the Governors of the 50 States, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the officials of other areas under the flag of the United States to observe United Nations Day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-third day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07-5334

Billing code 3195-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00093-CV

Arthur RAKOWITZ,

Appellant

v.

Bexar County 

BEXAR COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-01314

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 5, 2013

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

Appellant is appealing the trial court’s denial of his application for a temporary 

restraining order based on a lack of jurisdiction. Appellate courts have jurisdiction over final 

judgments and interlocutory orders the Legislature deems appealable by statute. Lehmann v. 

Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.

App.—El Paso 1997, no pet.). A party may appeal from an interlocutory order that grants or 

denies a temporary injunction or overrules a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction. See TEX.

CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(4) (West Supp. 2012). However, a temporary 
04-13-00093-CV

- 2 -

restraining order is generally not an appealable order. In re Tex. Natural Res. Conservation 

Comm’n, 85 S.W.3d 201, 205 (Tex. 2002) (orig. proceeding); see also In re Newton, 146 S.W.3d 

648, 652-53 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Therefore, because it appeared we lack jurisdiction 

over this appeal, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be 

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond; therefore, this appeal is dismissed

for want of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM