alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order filed December 21, 2017

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 17

- 00914

- CV

____________ NDEM BURABARI ODUU , Appellant

V.

BARIVURE ELIZABETH DAN

- DUKOR , Appellee

On Appeal from the 311th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016

- 00572



### ORDER

On December 7, 2017 , appellant filed an affidavit of indigence in this court. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(b)(1) provides that when a statement of inability to afford payment of costs was filed in the trial court, the party’s indigence
status in the trial court carries forwar d on appeal. The exception to this rule is when the party files a motion alleging the party’s financial circumstances have materially changed since the date of the trial court’s order. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(3).2

The clerk’s record has not been filed in this appeal. This court has not been advised whether appellant filed a statement of inability to afford payment of costs in the trial court, whether the statement was contested, or the ruling on any contest, if any. To determine appellant’s indigent status, we issue the following order for a partial clerk’s record.

We order the Harris County District Clerk to file a partial clerk’s record with
the clerk of this court on or before January 5, 2018 . The partial clerk’s record shall contain (1) the judgment being a ppealed; (2) any motion for new trial, other post

judgment motion, or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law; and (3) the notice of appeal. In addition, the partial clerk’s record shall contain: (4) appellant’s statement of inability to afford payment of costs; (5) the contest(s) to the statement, if any; (6) the trial court’s order ruling on any contest; and (7) any other documents pertaining to the claim of indigence and the contests thereto.

PER CURIAM
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-15086-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### STATE v. RUSS

No. 191 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 190.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 February 1980.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58828-58831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5115]



[[Page 58828]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 08-08]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-08 with attached transmittal, and 
policy justification.

    Dated: October 11, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 58829]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17OC07.024


[[Page 58830]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17OC07.025


[[Page 58831]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17OC07.026

[FR Doc. 07-5115 Filed 10-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 01

- 00 432

- CV

Martha Seward Oestreich , Appellant

v.

Ronald David Seward , Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 12,048 , HONORABLE V. MURRAY JORDAN , JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Martha Seward Oestreich filed her notice of appeal on July 31, 2001, and the

record was filed by January 23, 2002. Appellant = s brief was originally due to be filed by February 22,

2002. We extended the dead line for filing appellant = s brief to April 25, 2002. To date, appellant has not

filed her brief. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

__________________________________________
Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 8, 2002Do Not Publish
#### PHILLIPS v. WRENN BROTHERS

No. 46 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 35.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 November 1971.
----

----

**EXHIBIT        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF        THE        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                     |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Tang                Chien Chang |   |   |   |
| Tang Chien ChangChief Executive Officer  |   |   |        |
# C_2009137EN.01001801.xml

| 17.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 137/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 137/18

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/94/09

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2009/C 137/09

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising general competition EPSO/AST/94/09 to recruit assistants (AST 3) in the buildings sector.

The competition notice is published in 23 languages in Official Journal C 137 A of 17 June 2009.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
# C_2011285EN.01000801.xml

| 29.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/8

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

2011/C 285/04

Aid No: SA.33515 (11/XA)

Member State: Germany

Region: Schleswig-Holstein

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving an individual aid: Beihilfen für die Identitätssicherung von Rindern und Schweinen nach gemeinschaftsrechtlichen und nationalen Bestimmungen zur Kennzeichnung und Registrierung von Tieren

Legal basis: Richtlinien für die Gewährung von Beihilfen zur Identitätssicherung zum Schutz der Verschleppung von Tierseuchen im Viehverkehr (Beihilfe-Richtlinien zur Identitätssicherung)

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company: Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme: EUR 0,31 million

Maximum aid intensity: 100 %

Date of implementation: —

Duration of scheme or individual aid award: 20 September 2011-31 December 2013

Objective of aid: Animal diseases (Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006)

Sector(s) concerned: All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume Schleswig-Holstein |
| --- |
| Mercatorstraße 3 |
| 24106 Kiel |
| DEUTSCHLAND |

Ministerium für Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume Schleswig-Holstein

Mercatorstraße 3

24106 Kiel

DEUTSCHLAND

Website: http://www.schleswig-holstein.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/1019322/publicationFile/Beihilfe_RiLi_Identitaet.pdf

Other information: —

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00333

- CV
Eno Williams and Anthony Welch v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 of Fort Bend County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- CCV

- 066910

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT O F APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant s

. We further order this deci s ion certified below for observance. March 17, 2022
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHERY FERDIG and

NIKI HILDE,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv133/RS-MD

PISP LLC, d/b/a

LUCKY’S BINGO,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 6) is denied as moot. 

ORDERED on October 18, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 60053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Environmental Desk Reference for Airport Actions

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On May 18, 2006, the Federal Aviation Administration's Office 
of Airports (ARP) published a notice in the Federal Register. That 
Notice told interested parties about the availability of the Preamble 
for FAA Order 5050.4B, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 
Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions (71 FR 29014). In that 
Preamble, ARP stated that it would prepare a desk reference to provide 
its staff and interested parties with information on integrating and 
complying with Federal environmental laws, regulations, and Executive 
Orders other than NEPA (71 FR 29015).
    Today's Notice alerts interested parties that ARP has prepared the 
desk reference, entitled ``Environmental Desk Reference for Airport 
Actions.'' Interested parties may review a copy of the document at the 
following Web site: http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/airports/environmental/environmental_desk_ref/.
    ARP will publish changes to the Desk Reference that may be needed 
to respond to changes in the laws, regulations, or Executive Orders the 
Desk Reference discusses.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ed Melisky, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Office of Airports, Airport Planning and Environmental 
Division, 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 209591; telephone: 
202-267-5869. His e-mail is <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff9a9b889e8d9bd1929a9396948c86bf999e9ed1989089"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="335657445241571d5e565f5a58404a735552521d545c45">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 12, 2007.
Benito DeLeon,
Director, Office of Airport Planning and Programming. APP-1.
[FR Doc. 07-5224 Filed 10-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Royal Quantum Group, Inc. a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Ron Ruskowsky, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to
the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Royal Quantum Group, Inc., and will be retained by Royal Quantum Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








/S/Ron
      Ruskowsky
              Chief
      Executive and Financial Officer
              April
      15, 2010
SCWC-29696 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
DOUGLAS LEONE and PATRICIA A. PERKINS-LEONE, as Trustees under that certain unrecorded Leone-Perkins Family Trust dated August 26, 1999, as amended, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs. COUNTY OF MAUI, a political subdivision of the State of Hawai# i, WILLIAM SPENCE, in his capacity as Director of the Department of Planning of the County of Maui, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees. (CIV. NO. 07-1-0496)

and WILLIAM L. LARSON and NANCY LARSON, as Trustees under that certain unrecorded Larson Family Trust dated October 30-, 1992,

as amended, Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs. COUNTY OF MAUI, a political subdivision of the State of Hawai# i, WILLIAM SPENCE, in his capacity as Director of the Department of Planning of the County of Maui, Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees. (CIV. NO. 09-1-0413)

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 29696; CIV. NOS. 07-1-0496 and 09-1-0413) Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29696 12-DEC-2012 09:31 AMORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees’ application for writ of certiorari filed on October 29, 2012, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, December 12, 2012. Patrick K. Wong and Mary Blaine Johnston for petitioners /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

2
#### BANK v. MORGAN

No. 70 PC.

No. 34 (Spring Term).

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 63.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 4 December 1979.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of League Now Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Lisa Bischof, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Lisa Bischof


Lisa Bischof


Chief Financial Officer


August 13, 2012





A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

The Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2251

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Elias Zamarripa, *

also known as Homeboy, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 7, 2006

Filed: February 16, 2006

___________

Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Elias Zamarripa pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with

intent to distribute 500 grams or more of methamphetamine mixture, in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court1

 sentenced him to 188 months in prison and 5

years of supervised release. On appeal, Zamarripa’s counsel has moved to withdraw

and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
-2-

Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel’s motion

to withdraw.

______________________________
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 26 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03259-HB Document 9-6 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 7 of 7
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

TRIPLE TEE GOLF, INC., A FLORIDA 

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TAYLOR MADE GOLF COMPANY, INC., A 

DELAWARE CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2015-1564

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of California in No. 3:11-cv-02974-JLSWVG, Judge Janis L. Sammartino.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JACQUELINE TADROS, Jacqueline Tadros, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, FL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also 

represented by MELVIN KENNETH SILVERMAN, Melvin K. 

Silverman & Associates, P.C., Pompano Beach, FL.

BRIDGETTE A. AGNESS, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & 

Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendantappellee. Also represented by GARY A. CLARK. 
 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, CLEVENGER, and BRYSON,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 May 5, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Clerk of Court
#### STATE v. BROWN and STATE v. MADDOX and STATE v. PHILLIPS

No. 3 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 261.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 March 1972.
<PAGE>  1

Exhibit 3.2

                        CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                   OF

                      CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                   OF

                          LINDBERG CORPORATION


     LINDBERG CORPORATION, a corporation organized and existing under

and by virtue of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the

"corporation"),

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST:    That the board of directors of the corporation, at a

meeting duly held, adopted a resolution proposing and declaring

advisable the following amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of

the corporation:

          The corporation's Certificate of Incorporation shall
          be amended by changing Article FOURTH thereof so
          that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as
          follows:

               FOURTH.  The total number of shares of all
          classes of stock which the corporation shall have
          authority to issue is 26,000,000, of which
          25,000,000 shall be shares of common stock, $0.01
          par value, and 1,000,000 of which shall be shares of
          preferred stock, $0.01 par value.  The corporation
          may issue preferred stock from time to time in one
          or more series as the board of directors of the
          corporation may establish by the adoption of a
          resolution or resolutions relating thereto, each
          series to have such voting powers, full or limited,
          or no voting powers, and such designations,
          preferences and relative, participating, optional or
          other special rights, and qualifications,
          limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be
          stated and expressed in the resolution or
          resolutions providing for the issue of such series
          adopted by the board of directors pursuant to the
          authority granted hereby.

     SECOND:   That, at the duly called and held annual meeting of the

stockholders of the corporation, the necessary number of shares required

by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

     THIRD:    That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in

accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware

General Corporation Law.

<PAGE>  2

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the corporation has caused this certificate to

be signed by Stephen S. Penley, its Secretary, this 24th day of April,

1998.


                                LINDBERG CORPORATION



                                By:________________
                                  Stephen S. Penley
                                  Secretary


                                     2
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 1 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 2 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 3 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 4 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 5 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 6 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 7 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 8 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 9 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 10 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 11 of 12
Case 5:10-cv-00104-RS-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/05/10 Page 12 of 12