alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3


 


	 	


 

201 Isabella
Street

Pittsburgh,
PA 15212

  










  


April 8, 2020





 


Diana C. Toman





c/o Arconic Corporation





201 Isabella Street





Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212


 








Dear Diana:


 





This letter memorializes our recent discussions
regarding our collective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its dramatic impact on our community, our economy, and Arconic Corporation
(the “Company”).


 





You have voluntarily agreed, during the
Salary Reduction Period (as defined below), to reduce your rate of base salary by 20% from your rate of base salary (your “Regular
Salary”) set forth in the letter agreement between Arconic Inc. and you, dated January 28, 2020 (the “Letter
Agreement”). The “Salary Reduction Period” shall mean the period commencing on April 16, 2020 and
concluding on December 31, 2020 (or such earlier date as the Company determines to conclude the Salary Reduction Period for other
salaried employees). Notwithstanding the foregoing, for all purposes of the Company’s employee benefit plans, including,
without limitation, the Company’s Executive Severance Plan and the Company’s Change in Control Severance Plan, determinations
made by reference to your annual base salary shall be based on your Regular Salary, without regard to the temporary reduction contemplated
hereby. In recognition of the challenges under which the economy is currently operating, the reference to September 30, 2020 in
the “Relocation” paragraph of the Letter Agreement is hereby modified to refer to the later of September 30, 2020 or
the 60th day following the conclusion of the Salary Reduction Period.





 


Except as modified
hereby, the Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The section of the Letter Agreement entitled “Governing
Law; Jurisdiction” shall apply to this letter as if set forth herein, mutatis mutandis.


 


Please indicate your
agreement to the foregoing by your signature below.


 


Best Regards,





 


 


	By: 	/s/ William F. Austen	
	Name: 	William F. Austen	 
	Title:	Chair, Compensation and Benefits Committee

                                           Arconic Corporation
	 


 





	Acknowledged and Agreed:	 	Date:	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Diana C. Toman		04/08/2020	 
	Diana C. Toman
# C_2011334EN.01000701.xml

| 15.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/7

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 334/06

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 6.7.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 6.7.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/1N2AB. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | Norwegian waters of I and II |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 1096085 |

Date and time of closure

6.7.2011

Duration

6.7.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/1N2AB.

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Gadus morhua

Zone

Norwegian waters of I and II

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

1096085

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (the Company) for the period ended October 31, 2009, I, William A. Shumaker, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended October 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 11, 2009



/s/ William A. ShumakerWilliam A. Shumaker President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit
31.2**
  **Certification
of Chief Financial Officer**
 **pursuant
to Rule 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)**
 **of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,**
 **as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**
  I, Dilip
Shrestha, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), certify
that:
  (1)  I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Advanced Medical Institute Inc;
  (2)  Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
  (3)  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  (4)  The small
business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
  (a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  (b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
  (c)  disclosed
in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s fourth
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (5)  The small
business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
  (b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer ‘s internal controls over
financial reporting.
 
 By:
    /s/ Dilip
  ShresthaDilip ShresthaChief Financial
  OfficerMay
      24, 2005
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-7      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 1 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-7      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 2 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-7      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 3 of 4

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-7      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 4 of 4
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LEROY C FERGUSON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00232-MP-WCS

EDWIN G BUSS, WALTER MCNEIL,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 20, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the amended petition in this case be denied. The time for

filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. Upon consideration, the Court agrees that

a 60 day stint in administrative confinement is not the type of atypical and significant hardship

that can give rise to a constitutional claim. Also, a person serving life but hoping for parole does

not have a liberty interest in gain time. Accordingly it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and

incorporated herein. 

2. The Amended Petition, Doc. 18, is denied. For the reasons stated above, the Court

finds that Petitioner fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right and the issues are not adequate enough to deserve

encouragement to proceed further. Accordingly, no certificate of appealability is

appropriate in this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of August, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00232-MP-WCS Document 21 Filed 08/17/11 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 13, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 63965]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5658]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 13, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 63965]]


                Notice of November 8, 2007

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Iran

                On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the 
                President declared a national emergency with respect to 
                Iran pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 
                Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the 
                unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 
                security, foreign policy, and economy of the United 
                States constituted by the situation in Iran. Because 
                our relations with Iran have not yet returned to 
                normal, and the process of implementing the January 19, 
                1981 agreements with Iran is still underway, the 
                national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, must 
                continue in effect beyond November 14, 2007. Therefore, 
                consistent with section 202(d) of the National 
                Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing 
                for 1 year this national emergency with respect to 
                Iran.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    November 8, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-5658
Filed 11-9-07; 8:54 am]
Billing code 3195-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### National Communications System

          - [Docket No. NCS-2007-0005]

# AGENCY:

National Communications System, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice of Cancellation of the Federal Advisory Committee Teleconference Meeting of the President's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC). 

# SUMMARY:

                        The meeting of the President's National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee (NSTAC) scheduled for November 8, 2007 from 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. is cancelled. Notice of this meeting was published in the October 12, 2007,                         **Federal Register**                         at 58110-58111.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Sue Daage, Industry Operations Branch at NPPD/NCS/Mail Stop 8510, DHS/245 Murray Lane, Bldg. 410, Washington, DC 20528-8510.                         *Telephone:*                         (703) 235-5526,                         *e-mail: Sue.Daage@dhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

NSTAC advises the President on issues and problems related to implementing national security and emergency preparedness telecommunications policy. Notice of cancellation os this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), Pub. L. 92-463, as amended, 5 U.S.C. App.

Sallie McDonald,

Director, National Communications System.

[FR Doc. 07-5592 Filed 11-7-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-10-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JAMES ARNOLD JORDAN GARMAN,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:10cv25-WS

PATRICK HAMMERGREN, P.A.,

Defendant.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 9)

docketed April 1, 2010. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's action

be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the court. 

On April 19, 2010, the plaintiff's copy of the report and recommendation was

returned to the clerk's office as undeliverable. See Doc. 10. Although it is his

responsibility to do so, the plaintiff has not provided the court with a current address. 

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 9) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:10cv25-WS

2. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of April , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

 WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

**SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 13 OF TITLE 18**

**OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18U.S.C.1350)**

ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

** **

** **

In connection with the Annual Report of CanAlaskaUranium Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended April 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harry Chan, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)	the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:	July 29, 2013

 

* *

*“Harry Chan”***		**

Harry Chan

Chief Financial Officer
II 

Calendar No. 433 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2472 

[Report No. 116–218] 

To redesignate the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Plum Brook 

Station, Ohio, as the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at the 

Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

FEBRUARY 27, 2020 

Reported by Mr. WICKER, without amendment 

A BILL 

To redesignate the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center 

at Plum Brook Station, Ohio, as the NASA John H. 

Glenn Research Center at the Neil A. Armstrong Test 

Facility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2472 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Neil A. Armstrong 

3 Test Facility Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds as follows: 

6 (1) Neil A. Armstrong, through his own defini7 tion, was first and foremost as a test pilot. 

8 (2) A native of Wapakoneta, Ohio, Armstrong 

9 began his inspiring career in space exploration in 

10 Cleveland, Ohio, at what is now the NASA John H. 

11 Glenn Research Center. 

12 (3) Becoming the first human to land a space13 craft, and then set foot upon, the moon, represents 

14 the greatest dream of any test pilot. 

15 (4) Therefore, it is fitting that the premier aer16 onautics and space test station in Ohio should be re17 named in his honor. 

18 SEC. 3. REDESIGNATION OF NASA JOHN H. GLENN RE19 SEARCH CENTER AT PLUM BROOK STATION, 

20 OHIO, AS NASA JOHN H. GLENN RESEARCH 

21 CENTER AT THE NEIL A. ARMSTRONG TEST 

22 FACILITY. 

23 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The NASA John H. Glenn 

24 Research Center at Plum Brook Station, Ohio, is hereby 

25 redesignated as the NASA John H. Glenn Research Cen26 ter at the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2472 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the station referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘NASA John H. Glenn 

5 Center at the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility’’. 

6 (c) SAVINGS.—Nothing in this section shall be con7 strued to alter the relationship between the Plum Brook 

8 Station and the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 433 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2472 

[Report No. 116–218] 

A BILL 

To redesignate the NASA John H. Glenn Research 

Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility. NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at the Center at Plum Brook Station, Ohio, as the 

FEBRUARY 27, 2020 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 57362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4971]



[[Page 57362]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[FIle No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Certain Companies Quoted on the Pink Sheets: 
Alliance Transcription Services, Inc., Prime Petroleum Group, Inc., 
T.W. Christian, Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

October 4, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
the issuers listed below. As set forth below for each issuer, questions 
have arisen regarding the adequacy and accuracy of publicly-
disseminated information concerning, among other things: (1) The 
companies' assets, (2) the companies' business operations and/or 
management, (3) the companies' current financial condition, and/or (4) 
financing arrangements involving the issuance of the companies' shares.
    1. Alliance Transcription Services, Inc. is a Nevada company with 
offices in Maine and California. Questions have arisen regarding the 
adequacy and accuracy of press releases concerning the company's assets 
and its current operations and financial condition and transactions 
involving the issuance of the company's shares.
    2. Prime Petroleum Group, Inc. is a Nevada company with offices in 
Washington. Questions have arisen regarding the adequacy and accuracy 
of press releases and other publicly-disseminated information 
concerning the company's assets and its current operations, management 
and financial condition.
    3. T.W. Christian, Inc. is a Minnesota company with offices in 
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Questions have arisen regarding 
the adequacy and accuracy of press releases concerning the company's 
assets and its current operations, management and financial condition.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the companies listed above.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the 
companies listed above is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, 
October 4, 2007, through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on October 17, 2007.

    By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4971 Filed 10-4-07; 10:28 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Case 3:10-cr-00067-RV-ZCB Document 495 Filed 03/25/22 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:10-cr-00067-RV-ZCB Document 495 Filed 03/25/22 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:10-cr-00067-RV-ZCB Document 495 Filed 03/25/22 Page 3 of 3