alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 8, 2011

d0228 

# Order

March 8, 2011

141781(60)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141781 COA: 287724 Oakland CC: 91-106220-FC RODNEY O. HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for rec onsideration of this Court’s December 20, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does notappear that the order was entered erroneously.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT ALLEN,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv226/LAC/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May 17, 2012 (doc. 21). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6 day of July, 2012. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00226-LC-EMT Document 24 Filed 07/06/12 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011124EN.01001101.xml

| 27.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 124/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124/11

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

2011/C 124/07

The Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block M2 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).

Mijnbouwregeling

Staatscourant

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block M2 of the Dutch continental shelf.

Mijnbouwwet

Staatsblad

The Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the abovementioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| De minister van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie |
| --- |
| ter attentie van de heer P. Jongerius, directie Energiemarkt |
| ALP A/562 |
| Bezuidenhoutseweg 30 |
| Postbus 20101 |
| 2500 EC Den Haag |
| NEDERLAND |

De minister van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie

ter attentie van de heer P. Jongerius, directie Energiemarkt

ALP A/562

Bezuidenhoutseweg 30

Postbus 20101

2500 EC Den Haag

NEDERLAND

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken no later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained by calling Mr P. C. de Regt on the following telephone number: +31 703797382.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

■..................................................................■

JOSE DE JESUS GRULLON 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

CITIGROUP – EXECUTIVE PLANNING 

CENTER, 

 Defendant. 

■..................................................................■

Case No. 07 CV 3224 (KMK) (GAY) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record: 

 Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for 

• Defendant Citigroup Inc. (incorrectly denominated in the Complaint as “Citigroup 

– Executive Planning Center”) 

I certify that I am admitted to practice in this Court. 

Dated: August 24, 2007 

 

s/Steven Gerber 

 Steven Gerber, Esq. 

 Adorno & Yoss LLP 

 155 Willowbrook Blvd., Suite 300 

 Wayne, NJ 07470 

 (973) 256-9000 phone number 

 (973) 256-9001 fax number 

 

Case 7:07-cv-03224-KMK-GAY Document 7 Filed 08/24/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009047EN.01001401.xml

| 26.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/14

---

Call for applications 2009

Second Programme of Community action in the field of Health (2008-2013)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 47/10)

A call for applications ‘Health — 2009’ is launched today within the framework of the Second Programme of Community action in the field of Health (2008-2013) (1).

1

This call for applications consists of the following parts:

| — | a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to specific actions in the form of projects, |
| --- | --- |

—

a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to specific actions in the form of projects,

| — | a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to specific actions in the form of conferences, |
| --- | --- |

—

a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to specific actions in the form of conferences,

| — | a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to the functioning of non governmental bodies and specialised networks (operating grants), |
| --- | --- |

—

a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to the functioning of non governmental bodies and specialised networks (operating grants),

| — | an invitation to Member States and participating countries for submission of joint actions. |
| --- | --- |

—

an invitation to Member States and participating countries for submission of joint actions.

The deadline for submissions of the proposals under each call is 20 May 2009.

20 May 2009

All the information, including the Commission Decision of 23 February 2009 on the adoption of the work plan for 2009 for the implementation of the second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008-2013), and on the selection, award and other criteria for financial contributions to the actions of this programme, are available on the website of the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers at the following address:

http://ec.europa.eu/eahc

---

(1)  Decision No 1350/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 establishing a Second Programme of Community action in the field of Health (2008-2013) (OJ L 301, 20.11.2007, p. 3-13).

1

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JIMMY EARL DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00029-MP-AK

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HASSETT,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File First

Amended Complaint. (Doc. 18). Having considered said motion, the Court is of the opinion that

it should be GRANTED, and he shall have through June 14, 2010, to file an amended complaint. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of May, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Rimrock Gold Corp. 10-Q/A



Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350







In connection with the accompanying
quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Rimrock Gold Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended November 30, 2008
(the “Report”), I, Jordan Starkman, President and Secretary of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|1. | Such Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in such Report fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|              | RIMROCK GOLD CORP.
|------------- | ------------------
|              |                   
|July 14, 2015 | By:               
|              |
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CRAIG K. STATEN,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv108/WS/EMT

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________ /

O R D E R

Plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, has filed a complaint for judicial review of an adverse

administrative decision of the Defendant and an amended motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis (Docs. 1, 14). Previously, on three occasions, the court has denied Plaintiff’s applications

to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 5, 8, 10). 

In the affidavit of financial status attached to the instant motion, Plaintiff indicates that his

wife earns the gross amount of $34,000.00 (or $2,833.00 monthly) per year working for the

Department of Defense as an administrative assistant, and he presently receives $120.00 per month

in Veterans Administration disability benefits (or $1440.00 yearly). Thus Plaintiff reports a gross

household monthly income of $2,953.00 (Doc. 14 at 4). He lists household monthly debts of

$2,737.00, including $40.00 for “recreation & welfare” (Doc. 14 at 4).1

 Also among Plaintiff’s

claimed expenses is a $900.00 monthly mortgage payment; in his application, however, Plaintiff has

not identified ownership of any real property as an asset. Plaintiff also lists as expenses “automobile

payment,” “auto insurance,” and “auto fuel/maint.,” but he fails to report any automobile as an asset. 

Additionally, although the court has previously informed Plaintiff that he must identify the amount

in his Thrift Savings Account (which Account Plaintiff has advised he possesses) (Doc. 8 at 1), in

1 The court notes that in a previous application, Plaintiff listed his monthly debts as $2,272.00, some $465.00

less than what he currently claims (Doc. 9 at 4). 
Page 2 of 2

the instant application he has again failed to do so. 

Based on the foregoing assessment, particularly Plaintiff’s reported yearly household income

of $35,440.00, the court DENIES Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. In

order to proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall pay the full filing fee of $350.00. Absent a showing

of good cause, Plaintiff should not submit—and the court will not entertain—yet another application

from Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s amended motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 14) is

DENIED. To proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall submit payment of $350.00 to the clerk of this

court within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of docketing of this order. 

2. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to the district court

that this case be dismissed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of September 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv108/WS/EMT
#### BRYANT v. LOWERY

No. 152 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 710.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 July 1981.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JUDY ANN LINDER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00189-MP-GRJ

BLANCA, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN PAIGE

AUGUSTINE AND STAFF,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 38, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, which recommends that defendants’ motion to dismiss, Doc. 33, be granted,

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Plaintiff has not objected to the recommendation, and the time

for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 38, is

ACCEPTED and incorporated herein.

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss, Doc. 33, is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, Doc. 21, is DISMISSED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00189-MP-GRJ Document 39 Filed 10/11/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RALPH WARREN GOLDEN,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-113-MP-GRJ

SECRETARY,

DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 40, Petitioner’s Motion For Enlargement

of Time to file a reply to the Response to the Petition. (Doc. 38.) The current deadline

for Petitioner to file a reply is August 10, 2011. (Doc. 37.) Petitioner requests an

additional 30 days within which to file a reply. 

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

Petitioner’s Motion for Enlargement of Time, Doc. 40, is GRANTED. Petitioner

shall have until September 9, 2011, to file a reply.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9 day of August 2011. th

 

s/ Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00113-MP-GRJ Document 41 Filed 08/09/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011367EN.01001501.xml

| 16.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 367/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 367/15

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 367/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 26.11.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 26.11.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Germany |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/N01514 |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | Greenland waters of NAFO 0 and 1; Greenland waters of V and XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

26.11.2011

Duration

26.11.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Germany

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/N01514

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Gadus morhua

Zone

Greenland waters of NAFO 0 and 1; Greenland waters of V and XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Oilsands Quest Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended April 30, 2009, the undersigned Christopher H. Hopkins, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:
  (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 July 29, 2009
 
  /s/Christopher H. HopkinsChristopher H. Hopkins, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

NutriSystem, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements (Nos. 333-117781 and 333-110772) on Form S-3 and registration statements (Nos. 333-44908 and 333-134215) on Form S-8 of NutriSystem, Inc. of our reports dated February 27, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of NutriSystem, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of NutriSystem, Inc. 

Our report dated February 27, 2007 with respect tothe consolidated balance sheets of NutriSystem, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2006, contains an explanatory paragraph that describes NutriSystem, Inc.’s adoption of the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation as required by Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsNo. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

February 27, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           901,917
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      25,821
<MORTGAGE>                                     235,319
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   23,061
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,304,036
<CASH>                                           2,035
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             258,213
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         304,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,380,732
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,277,999
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  29,994
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           25,305
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                274,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     14,761
<COMMON>                                        98,476
<OTHER-SE>                                     453,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,380,732
<PREMIUMS>                                     127,361
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             49,535
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,340
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 108,030
<BENEFITS>                                      65,684
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     18,408
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            70,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,787
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,787
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.56
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2   CERTIFICATION  I, Christine M. Applegate, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Porfavor, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  May 15, 2008     By: /s/ Christine M. Applegate Christine M. Applegate CFO, Controller, Treasurer, Secretary, Director