alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57350-57351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4996]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Notice of Meeting of the Legal Services Corporation 
Board of Directors' Search Committee for LSC Inspector General

Time and Date: Legal Services Corporation Board of Directors' Search 
Committee for LSC Inspector General will meet at 9:30 a.m., Eastern 
Daylight Time, on October 12, 2007.

LOCATION:  The Georgetown Suites Hotel, 1111 30th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC.

STATUS OF MEETING:  Closed. The transcript of any portions of the 
closed session falling within the relevant provision of the Government 
in Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (6), and LSC's implementing 
regulation, 45 CFR 1622.5(a) and (e), will not be available for public 
inspection. The transcript of any portions not falling within either of 
these provisions will be available for public inspection.

Matters To Be Considered

 Closed Session

    1. Approval of Agenda.
    2. Interviews of select candidates for the position of LSC 
Inspector General.

[[Page 57351]]

    3. Review and discussion regarding qualifications of interviewed 
and other viable candidates.
    4. Consider and act on further steps to be taken in connection with 
the selection and retention of a finalist for the position of Inspector 
General.
    5. Consider and act on the selection of candidates to recommend to 
the Board of Directors for the Board's consideration.
    6. Consider and act on adjournment of meeting.

Contact Person for Information:  Patricia D. Batie, Manager of Board 
Operations, at (202) 295-1500.

Special Needs:  Upon request, meeting notices will be made available in 
alternate formats to accommodate visual and hearing impairments. 
Individuals who have a disability and need an accommodation to attend 
the meeting may notify Patricia D. Batie, at (202) 295-1500.

    October 4, 2007.
Victor M. Fortuno,
Vice President for Legal Affairs, General Counsel & Corporate 
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4996 Filed 10-4-07; 2:17 pm]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Michael Hickerson, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Anthony I. Giacobbe, J.H.O.), rendered February 16, 2016, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Anthony I. Giacobbe, J.H.O.), rendered February 16, 2016, affirmed.</p><p>Upon our review of the record as a whole and the circumstances of the plea in its totality (<i>see People v Sougou</i>, 26 NY3d 1052, 1055 [2015]), we are satisfied that defendant "intelligently and understandingly waived [his] constitutional rights" (<i>People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375, 383 [2015]), and entered an otherwise knowing and voluntary guilty plea to disorderly conduct, a violation, in exchange for a sentence of two days' community service. The plea occurred three months after defendant was arrested and charged, and he had counsel on the case. Moreover, defendant was aware of his right to a trial, because his case was on for trial the very same day that he pleaded guilty. At the plea proceeding, defense counsel informed the court that defendant had "authorized" the entry of a plea of guilty to disorderly conduct; that defendant understood that this was a violation, not a crime; and that defendant understood that he "will be sentenced to a conditional discharge" and "must complete two days of community service." In response to the court's questioning, defendant personally confirmed that he understood "what [his] lawyer just said" and that he was ready for sentencing. </p><p>A failure to recite the <i>Boykin</i> rights (<i>see Boykin v Alabama</i>, 395 US 238 [1969]) does not automatically invalidate an otherwise voluntary and intelligent plea (<i>see People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375, 383 [2015]; <i>People v Sougou</i>, 26 NY3d 1052, 1054—1055 [2015]; <a href="../2016/2016_00029.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Rosa</i>, 135 AD3d 434</a>, 435 [2016], <i>lv denied </i>27 NY3d 968 [2016]). While the plea allocution could have been more robust, the record here establishes that defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights.</p><p>Defendant's claim that the Judicial Hearing Officer acted without jurisdiction in presiding over his guilty plea and sentencing is both unpreserved and without merit (<i>see People v Abdrabel</i>, calendar number 16-359, decided herewith.)</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: November 21, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Maria J. Leger, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Wentworth Management, Defendant, and Dayton Towers Cooperative, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Sally E. Unger, J.), entered July 30, 2014. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $366.49 on her cause of action against defendant Dayton Towers Cooperative. The appeal was transferred to this court by decision and order of the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department, dated October 13, 2016.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.</p><p>Insofar as is relevant to the appeal in this small claims action, plaintiff seeks to recover rent paid, based on a claim that Dayton Towers Cooperative (defendant), her landlord, breached the warranty of habitability (Real Property Law ยง 235-b). Following a nonjury trial, the Civil Court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $366.49 as against defendant. Defendant appeals.</p><p>In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has . . . been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" (CCA 1807; <i>see</i> CCA 1804; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584 [2000]; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d 125 [2000]). Furthermore, the determination of a trier of fact as to issues of credibility is given substantial deference, as a trial court's opportunity to observe and evaluate the testimony and demeanor of the witnesses affords it a better perspective from which to assess their credibility (<i>see Vizzari v State of New York</i>, 184 AD2d 564 [1992]; <i>Kincade v Kincade</i>, 178 AD2d 510, 511 [1991]). This deference applies with greater force to judgments rendered in the Small Claims Part of the court (<i>see Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126).</p><p>Upon a review of the record, we find that the judgment provided the parties with substantial justice according to the rules and principles of substantive law (<i>see</i> CCA 1804, 1807; <i>Ross v Friedman</i>, 269 AD2d 584; <i>Williams v Roper</i>, 269 AD2d at 126). There is no basis to disturb the Civil Court's finding that the loss of heat and water described by plaintiff was a sufficient basis for an award of damages under Real Property Law ยง 235-b. Defendant failed to demonstrate the merits of its remaining contention.</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. </p><p>Solomon, J.P., Weston and Elliot, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: December 15, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: KATHLEEN KELLOGG

- TAXE,

Debtor

.

------------------------------

RICHARD TAXE,

Appellant,

v.

CAROLYN A. DYE, Chapter 7 Trustee,

Appellee. No. 18

- 60052

BAP No. 17

- 1092

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Faris, Spraker, and Kurtz, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted December 11, 2019 **

Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Richard Taxe appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 18

- 60052

judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s judgment after a trial in an adversary

proceeding filed by the chapter 7 trustee in Kath leen Kellogg

- Taxe’s bankruptcy

case. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo the

bankruptcy court’s conclusions of law and for clear error its findings of fact.

Decker v. Tramiel (In re JTS Corp.) , 617 F.3d 1102, 1109 (9th Cir. 2010). We

affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not clearly err in finding that Taxe owned the

shares and assets of Dwarfco Productions, Inc

. because the record supports the

bankruptcy court’s determination that Taxe controlled Dwarfco Productions, Inc

.

The bankruptcy court properly concluded the shares and assets of Dwarfco

Productions, Inc. are the community property of Taxe and debtor Kathleen

Kellogg

- Taxe, and thus those assets are property of the bankruptcy estate of

Kathleen Kel logg

- Taxe

. See Brace v. Speier ( In re Brace

) , 908 F.3d 531, 537 (9th

Cir. 2018) ( “ Under California law, there is a general presumption that, absent a

statute to the contrary, all property acquired during marriage is community

property. ”)

.

We reject as unsupported by the record Taxe’s contention s that the

bankruptcy court advocated in favor of the bankruptcy trustee and that the

bankruptcy court never ordered Taxe to turn over gemstones in his possession.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on3 18

- 60052

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
Ex. 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of  International Industrial Enterprises for the quarter  ended June 30, 2008, I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of International Industrial Enterprises for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended June 30, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of International Industrial Enterprises.      By:/s/ David RogersName:David RogersTitle:Principal Executive Officer,
and DirectorDate:August 11, 2008By:/s/ David RogersName:David RogersTitle:Principal Financial OfficerDate:August 11, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Lawrence Chimerine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Annual Report of First Transaction Management, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of First Transaction Management, Inc.





/s/ Lawrence ChimerineLawrence ChimerinePrincipal Accounting OfficerFirst Transaction Management, Inc.





March 31, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 188 (Friday, September 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 55189]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Inland Waterways Users Board

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In Accordance with 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463), announcement is made of the forthcoming meeting.
    Name of Committee: Inland Waterways Users Board (Board).
    Date: November 2, 2007.
    Location: Holiday Inn--Quincy, 201 S. Third Street, Quincy, IL 
62301, (217) 222-2666.
    Time: Registration will begin at 8:30 a.m. and the meeting is 
scheduled to adjourn at 1 p.m.
    Agenda: The Board will hear briefings on the status of both the 
funding for inland navigation projects and studies, and the Inland 
Waterways Trust Fund, and be provided updates of various inland 
waterways projects.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mark R. Pointon, Headquarters, 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, CECW-IP, 441 G Street, NW., Washington, 
DC 20314-1000; Ph: (202) 761-4258.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Any 
interested person may attend, appear before, or file statements with 
the committee at the time and in the manner permitted by the committee.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-4778 Filed 9-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-92-M
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Uranium Power Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended April 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:
September 15, 2003
    
    
    By
    /s/ Thornton J. DonaldsonThornton J. Donaldson,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 170

### CFR Correction

In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 150 to 189, revised as of July 1, 2006, in § 170.112, on page 212, paragraph (a)(1) is corrected to read as follows:

§ 170.112

(a) * * * (1) After the application of any pesticide on an agricultural establishment, the agricultural employer shall not allow or direct any worker to enter or to remain in the treated area before the restricted-entry interval specified on the pesticide labeling has expired, except as provided in this section.

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 07-55508 Filed 6-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS 

 

I, Richard M. Beyer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Intersil Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
# C_2009041EN.01000701.xml

| 19.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 41/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 February 2009

(2009/C 41/03)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2596 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,83 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4513 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,8846 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,1088 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4792 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,86 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,847 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 302,72 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7073 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,7865 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,282 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1338 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9726 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5882 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,768 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4691 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9263 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 865,69 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,8353 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6131 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4323 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 178,18 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,607 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,11 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,3942 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,546 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,933 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,4342 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,577 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2596

JPY

Japanese yen

116,83

DKK

Danish krone

7,4513

GBP

Pound sterling

0,8846

SEK

Swedish krona

11,1088

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4792

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,86

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

28,847

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

302,72

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7073

PLN

Polish zloty

4,7865

RON

Romanian leu

4,282

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1338

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9726

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5882

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,768

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4691

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9263

KRW

South Korean won

1 865,69

ZAR

South African rand

12,8353

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6131

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4323

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 178,18

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,607

PHP

Philippine peso

60,11

RUB

Russian rouble

45,3942

THB

Thai baht

44,546

BRL

Brazilian real

2,933

MXN

Mexican peso

18,4342

INR

Indian rupee

62,577

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---