alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PAUL C. JONES,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv127/MCR/MD

ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFFS

OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on July 20, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after reviewing

objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is adopted as the

opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for plaintiff’s failure to

prosecute and failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of August, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### KENAN v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

No. 75 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 688.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 May 1972.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RED MOUNTAIN BANK, N.A.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-100/RS-MD

EMERALD COAST CAR WASH, LLC, 

LEE A. SAGE, ROBERT PARKS, 

and UNKNOWN PERSON OR 

ENTITY IN POSSESSION OF 22431 

PANAMA CITY BEACH PARKWAY,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Before me is the Notice of Forbearance Agreement (Doc. 39). Pursuant to N.D. 

Fla. Loc. 16.2 it is ordered: 

1. The case is dismissed from the active docket of the court. 

2. In the event that the forbearance agreement is not consummated, the court 

reserves jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the 

date of this Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the 

case. The Parties’ request that the court retain jurisdiction for 180 days is 

denied. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative purposes, 

and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is direct to 

close the case in its entirety for all purposes. 
4. The United States Marshals Service is directed to cancel the foreclosure sale 

scheduled for September 30, 2010. 

ORDERED on September 21, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2349 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2349

   To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to eliminate the common 
          carrier exemption for telecommunications companies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2019

    Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Blumenthal) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to eliminate the common 
          carrier exemption for telecommunications companies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protection from Robocalling Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) illegal robocalls and spam calls are a growing 
        annoyance and problem for the people of the United States; and
            (2) exemptions within the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 
        U.S.C. 41 et seq.) limit the enforcement capabilities of the 
        Federal Trade Commission with respect to illegal robocalling 
        and spam calling.

SEC. 3. ELIMINATING THE COMMON CARRIER EXEMPTION FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS 
              COMPANIES.

    Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 U.S.C. 44) is 
amended by striking ``the Act entitled `An Act to regulate commerce,' 
approved February 14, 1887, and all Acts amendatory thereof and 
supplementary thereto and the Communications Act of 1934'' and 
inserting ``subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code,''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# Time and Date:

 9:30 a.m., Tuesday, October 16, 2007.

# Place:

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# Status:

These three items are open to the public.

      ( print page 57967)    

# Matters To Be Considered:

7937 Railroad Accident Report—Derailment of Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Train near the Mt. Vernon Square Station, Washington, DC, January 7, 2007 (DCA-07-FR-005).

7928 Brief of Accident—Brief and Safety Recommendations to the Federal Aviation Administration and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Concerning Deficiencies in the Design, Operation, and Safety Management of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

7928A Recommendation To Convene a Public Forum—The Safety of Unmanned Aircraft System Operations and Investigative Methodologies for Unmanned Aircraft Accidents and Incidents.

# News Media Contact:

 Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, October 12, 2007.

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *http://www.ntsb.gov*.                    

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: Friday, October 5, 2007.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-5018  Filed 10-9-07; 9:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TECHSHELL, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv154/RS-MD

HARD CANDY CASES, LLC;

SPECK PRODUCT DESIGN, INC.;

IPEARL, INC.; XGEAR, LLC;

CASE-MATE GEORGIA, LLC;

CASE-MATE INTERNATIONAL, LLC;

and CASE-MATE RETAIL, INC.,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Joint Motion To Dismiss With Prejudice (Doc. 146).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant XGear, LLC are dismissed with

prejudice.

2. Defendant XGear, LLC is dropped as a party to this case with prejudice.

3. Defendant XGear, LLC’s counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice.

ORDERED on February 16, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2009084EN.01000102.xml

| 8.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5453 — OEP/CCH)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 84/02

On 27 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5453. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5453. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quadra Projects Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Claude Diedrick, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

/s/ Claude DiedrickClaude DiedrickPresident, Chief Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial Officer, Treasurer and DirectorDate: October 13, 2009

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Flickering Star
Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Gerald W.. Quealy, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: February 17, 2006                  By: /s/ GERALD W. QUEALY
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Gerald W. Quealy
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                          and Director



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO FLICKERING STAR FINANCIAL, INC.,
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY FLICKERING STAR FINANCIAL, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolverine Exploration Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lee
Costerd, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the
Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and






(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.















/s/
Lee Costerd


Lee
Costerd


Chief
Executive Officer






December
22, 2008








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002













In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Wolverine Exploration Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Lee
Costerd, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of
Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and






(2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











/s/
Lee Costerd


Lee
Costerd


Chief
Financial Officer






December
22, 2008
#### BUTLER v. PETERS, COMR. OF MOTOR VEHICLES

No. 87.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 357.

Motion of defendants to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 17 August 1981.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PHILLIP J. KENNEDY,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv60/WS/EMT

JOHN GLASSMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On April 26, 2010, this

court entered an order giving Plaintiff twenty (20) days in which to either pay the filing fee of

$350.00 or submit a fully completed application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 4). Plaintiff

failed to respond to the order; therefore, on June 1, 2010, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff

to show cause, within twenty (20) days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to

comply with an order of the court (Doc. 5). The time for compliance with the show cause order has

now elapsed with no response from Petitioner.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 1st day of July 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:10cv60/WS/EMT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEFNEY PHILISTIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2124

[June 23, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Martin S. Fein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-000505CF10A.

Jefney Philistin, Sneads, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and MaryEllen M. 

Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through

Attorney General Pam Bondi, et al.;

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER

Pursuant to the Eleventh Circuit’s order, filed February 24, 2011 (doc. 159), the

Clerk is hereby directed to file the notice of appeal previously submitted by non-party

Robert Smith and forward same to the Court of Appeals, after the filing fee is paid. 

DONE and ORDERED this 28th day of February, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case No.: 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RONNY CROOK, D.O.C.# 275129, 

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 4:10cv87-SPM/WCS

DR. HANTZ, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an order filed May 4,

2010, Plaintiff was directed to respond to this court’s previous order, doc. 6, and also

given until May 28, 2010, to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff was specifically

warned that a recommendation would be made that this case be dismissed if there was

a failure to comply with that order. Doc. 9. To date, no response has been received

from the Plaintiff. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.
Page 2 of 2

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, this complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

Plaintiff shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by filing a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on June 9, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations within

14 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation. A party may respond to

another party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific

objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv87-SPM/WCS
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3441

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Ramius Hardiman lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids

____________ Submitted: March 24, 2020 Filed: March 30, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, BEAM, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Ramius Hardiman challenges the district court’s 1 imposition of a Residential

Reentry Center (RRC) special condition of supervised release, after he pleaded guilty to an escape charge. His counsel has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the RRC condition, and has moved to withdraw. After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its wide discretion in imposing the RRC condition. See United States v. Wiedower, 634 F.3d 490, 493 (8th Cir. 2011) (explaining the standard of review); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) (stating that a court may order a special release condition that is reasonably related to § 3553 factors, involves no greater deprivation of liberty than reasonably necessary, and is consistent with policy statements); United States v. Melton, 666 F.3d 513, 517-18 (8th Cir. 2012) (concluding that requiring a defendant to temporarily reside at a RRC is expressly authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3563(b)(11) and U.S.S.G. § 5B1.3(e)(1), and has been regularly upheld as a reasonable condition of supervised release; and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing a RRC condition solely because the defendant failed to succeed there in the past). Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

______________________________

1 The Honorable C.J. Williams, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Mark A. Roberts, United States Magistrate Judge for the Northern District of Iowa. -2-
# C_2009059EN.01001102.xml

| 13.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/11

---

Communication concerning the notice of open competition EPSO/AD/143/08

(2009/C 59/07)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is publishing a corrigendum to open competition EPSO/AD/143/08 for the recruitment of translators (AD 5) with Portuguese as their main language.

This corrigendum is published in Official Journal C 59 A of 13 March 2009 in Portuguese only.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://europa.eu/epso

---