alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MICHAEL MORGAN,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-120-SPM/WCS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 11). Plaintiff has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed an objection (doc. 14). Pursuant to Title 28, United

States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have conducted a de novo review of the

sections of the report to which objections have been made. I find that the Report

and Recommendation is correct and should be adopted.

Plaintiff filed a damages action against the United States and its agents

for the failure to notify him upon his arrest of the opportunity, pursuant to Article

36 of the Vienna Convention, to contact the Jamaican Embassy prior to his 1992

conviction. Despite Plaintiff’s objections, the Court agrees with the Magistrate
Judge that this case must be dismissed as barred by Florida’s four year statute

of limitations for actions of this sort, and for failure to state a claim upon which

relief may be granted, as it is established in this Circuit that the Vienna

Convention does not provide for private damages actions.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 11) is

adopted and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. This case is dismissed. The Clerk is directed to note on the docket

that this cause was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

3. All pending motions are denied as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this tenth day of September, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

2
## NO. 12

- 1 3

- 00 0 6 4

- C R

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

MILTON JASON COKER

, § APPEAL FROM THE 1 2 4 TH

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant was convicted of

possession of a controlled substance following a guilty plea. Thereafter, Appellant filed a notice of

appeal.

To be sufficient to invoke the appellate court’s full jurisdiction, the notice of appeal filed by

an appellant in a criminal case must bear the trial court’s certification of the appellant’s right to appeal

under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2 ). T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2 (d). The certification

should be part of the record when notice is filed, but may be added by timely amendment or

supplementation. Id

. Appellant’s notice of appeal does not include the required certification.

On April 15, 2013, this court notified Appellant through his counsel, pursuant to Texas Rules

of Appellate Procedure 25.2 and 37.1, that the notice of appeal does not include the trial court

certification. The notice also informed Appellant that the appeal would be dismiss ed unless, on or

before April 30, 2013, the clerk’s record was amended to include the required certification.

The deadline for responding to this court’s notice has expired, and the clerk’s record has not

been amended to show Appellant’s right to appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for want ofjurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d).

Opinion delivered May 15, 2013.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 15 , 2013

NO. 12

- 13

- 00064

- CR

MILTON JASON COKER

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court

of Gregg County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 34543

- B )

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and

that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is th erefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction ; and that this decision

be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J. , and Hoyle , J.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5557]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division

Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--VSI Alliance

    Notice is hereby given that, on April 30, 2007, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), VSI Alliance has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Canadian 
Microelectronics Corp., Kingston, Ontario, CANADA; and UMC, Hsinchu 
City, TAIWAN have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and VSI Alliance intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On November 29, 1996, VSI Alliance filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on March 4, 1997 (62 FR 9812).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on January 12, 
2007. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on February 26, 2007 (72 FR 8402).

Patricia A. Brink,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 07-5557 Filed 11-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DUKE F CRANFORD,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NAN JEFFCOAT, E POLLEY, JR,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Report and Recommendation by the Magistrate Judge,

Doc. 5. The Magistrate Judge recommends this case be dismissed, without prejudice for Plaintiff

to re-file if he pays the full filing fee. Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis in this

Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and does not allege he is in imminent danger from the

Defendants. Plaintiff has not objected to this recommendation, and the time for doing so has

passed. Finding no plain error, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 5, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein. 

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of June, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# C_2009270EN.01001701.xml

| 11.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/17

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 November 2009

2009/C 270/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4966 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,51 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4410 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89860 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2850 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5115 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3835 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,524 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 272,19 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7088 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2033 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2979 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2112 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6145 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5852 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,5988 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0224 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0788 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 739,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1616 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,2170 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2767 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 089,57 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0660 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 70,186 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,0194 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,855 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5685 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,9557 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,5170 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4966

JPY

Japanese yen

134,51

DKK

Danish krone

7,4410

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89860

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2850

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5115

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3835

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,524

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

272,19

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7088

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2033

RON

Romanian leu

4,2979

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2112

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6145

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5852

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,5988

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0224

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0788

KRW

South Korean won

1 739,87

ZAR

South African rand

11,1616

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,2170

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2767

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 089,57

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0660

PHP

Philippine peso

70,186

RUB

Russian rouble

43,0194

THB

Thai baht

49,855

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5685

MXN

Mexican peso

19,9557

INR

Indian rupee

69,5170

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHARLES TARVER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-87-RS-EMT

KENNETH TUCKER,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 30) and 

Petitioner’s Objections (Doc. 35). I have considered Petitioner’s objections de novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved 

and incorporated in this Order.

2. Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. 

3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner did 

not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on August 8, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00087-RS-EMT Document 36 Filed 08/08/12 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No. 3:10cr43/MCR

JOHNNY BROWN

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, the plea of guilty of

the Defendant, JOHNNY BROWN, to Counts I and II of the Indictment is hereby

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of May, 2010. 

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
|   | (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| Date: May 24, 2010 | By:    |  /                                               |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|               |   | /s/ Sergey Viktorovich Lukin                          |
|               |   | Sergey Viktorovich Lukin                              |
|               |   | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 125 (Friday, June 29, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-55507]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 51


Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of 
Implementation Plans

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 50 to 51, 
revised as of July 1, 2006, in Appendix S to Part 51, on page 483, 
reinstate paragraph II.A.4(iii) to read as follows:

Appendix S to Part 51--Emission Offset Interpretative Ruling

* * * * *
    II.* * *
    A.* * *
    4.* * *
    (iii) The fugitive emissions of a stationary source shall not be 
included in determining for any of the purposes of this ruling 
whether it is a major stationary source, unless the source belongs 
to one of the following categories of stationary sources:
    (a) Coal cleaning plants (with thermal dryers);
    (b) Kraft pulp mills;
    (c) Portland cement plants;
    (d) Primary zinc smelters;
    (e) Iron and steel mills;
    (f) Primary aluminum ore reduction plants;
    (g) Primary copper smelters;
    (h) Municipal incinerators capable of charging more than 250 
tons of refuse per day;
    (i) Hydrofluoric, sulfuric, or nitric acid plants;
    (j) Petroleum refineries;
    (k) Lime plants;
    (l) Phosphate rock processing plants;
    (m) Coke oven batteries;
    (n) Sulfur recovery plants;
    (o) Carbon black plants (furnace process);
    (p) Primary lead smelters;
    (q) Fuel conversion plants;
    (r) Sintering plants;
    (s) Secondary metal production plants;
    (t) Chemical process plants;
    (u) Fossil-fuel boilers (or combination thereof) totaling more 
than 250 million British thermal units per hour heat input;
    (v) Petroleum storage and transfer units with a total storage 
capacity exceeding 300,000 barrels;
    (w) Taconite ore processing plants;
    (x) Glass fiber processing plants;
    (y) Charcoal production plants;
    (z) Fossil fuel-fired steam electric plants of more than 250 
million British thermal units per hour heat input;
    (aa) Any other stationary source category which, as of August 7, 
1980, is being regulated under section 111 or 112 of the Act.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 07-55507 Filed 6-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
# C_2009081EN.01000301.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 81/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 81/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 April 2009

2009/C 81/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3425 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4482 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90930 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7751 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5236 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7975 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,593 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 295,58 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7095 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4541 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1755 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1447 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8813 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6664 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4045 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2968 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0203 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 797,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,3201 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,1757 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4334 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 382,37 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8062 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,250 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,8257 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,545 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9816 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,4493 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,2320 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3425

JPY

Japanese yen

134,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4482

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90930

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7751

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5236

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7975

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,593

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

295,58

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7095

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4541

RON

Romanian leu

4,1755

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1447

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8813

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6664

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4045

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2968

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0203

KRW

South Korean won

1 797,00

ZAR

South African rand

12,3201

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,1757

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4334

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 382,37

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8062

PHP

Philippine peso

64,250

RUB

Russian rouble

44,8257

THB

Thai baht

47,545

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9816

MXN

Mexican peso

18,4493

INR

Indian rupee

67,2320

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WILNER VAL SAINT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-104-SPM-GRJ

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES,

and VARIOUS UNKNOWN FEDERAL 

OFFICERS,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

Plaintiff, an inmate serving a sentence in the custody of the United States

Bureau of Prisons, initiated this case by filing a pro se complaint in the Gainesville

division of this Court. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at FCC ColemanMedium in the Middle District of Florida. (Doc. 10 at 2.) The events and omissions

giving rise to the claims alleged in Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint occurred while

Plaintiff was incarcerated at FCI Marianna in Marianna, Jackson County, Florida. (Id. at

5-6.) Jackson County is located within the territorial confines of the Panama City

division of this Court.

N.D.Fla.Loc.R. 3.1(A) provides in relevant part: “All civil cases in which venue

properly lies in a division of this district . . . shall be filed in that division and shall remain

pending in that division until final disposition unless transferred to another division by

order of the court.” In his First Amended Complaint Plaintiff has named as defendants

various unknown federal officers, who Plaintiff alleges were employed at FCI Marianna

Case 1:10-cv-00104-SPM-GRJ Document 15 Filed 09/07/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

as a factory foreman, forewomen and manager. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e) venue in a “A civil action in which a defendant

is an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof ... may ... be

brought in any judicial district in which (1) a defendant in the action resides, (2) a

substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, ... or (3) the

plaintiff resides if no real property is involved in the action. In this case, all of the events

and alleged omissions giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims in the First Amended Complaint

occurred at FCI Marianna in Marianna, Jackson County, Florida. The unknown federal

officers were employed at Marianna and the Plaintiff resides in Sumter County, Florida

at FCC Coleman-Medium and therefore neither the Defendants nor the Plaintiff reside

in the Gainesville division of the Court. Accordingly, venue for this action properly lies in

the Panama City division of this Court, which covers Jackson County. Therefore,

pursuant to N.D.Fla.Loc.R. 3.1(C) this action should be transferred to the Panama City

division of the Court.

Accordingly, upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

 The Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the Panama City division of the

Court pursuant to N.D.Fla.Loc.R. 3.1(C)

DONE AND ORDERED this 7 day of September 2011. 

th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-104-SPM-GRJ

Case 1:10-cv-00104-SPM-GRJ Document 15 Filed 09/07/11 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

        STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL
                            OFFICER OF KNOLOGY, INC.
                         PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. s. 1350

         Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer
of Knology, Inc. (the "Company") that this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A
for the period ended December 31, 2001, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Amended Report"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and the information contained in this Amended Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                         /s/ Rodger L. Johnson
Dated: October 29, 2002                 ____________________________
                                         Rodger L. Johnson
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: October 29, 2002                  /s/ Robert K. Mills
                                         ____________________________
                                         Robert K. Mills
                                         Chief Financial Officer
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 4 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 4 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03434-GBD Document 4 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 3 of 3