alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. KENNETH GRANT.

(Filed 15 April, 1964.)

1. Criminal Law §§ 3, 4, 131—

An attempt to break and enter is a misdemeanor for wbicb tbe maximum punishment is two years imprisonment.

2. Criminal Law § 130—

The indictment and not the commitment of the clerk controls, and the punishment may not exceed that for the offense charged in the indictment.

*6533. Criminal Law § 169—

Ordinarily, when the judgment imposed is excessive the cause will be remanded for proper judgment, but when the máximum legal sentence has already been served remand for proper judgment would be vain, so in such instance the cause will be remanded for correction of the judgment, with consecutive sentences subsequently imposed to fall into place on the basis of the correction.

ON March 10, 1964, the defendant filed an application for *certiorari*to review a judgment of imprisonment imposed on him by the Superior Court of GREENE County at its October, 1960 Term. We treat this application as for *habeas corpus*involving the legality of his imprisonment. All pertinent court records, duly certified, are attached to the petition.

The Attorney General has filed an answer, admitting as excessive the sentence of seven to nine years imposed in case No. 1377 upon a charge of “Attempt to break and enter a certain storehouse ... occupied by J. Exum Co., Inc., . . . with intent to steal . . . merchandise.” The Attorney General concedes that the maximum imprisonment for such offense can not exceed two years. The record discloses certain additional prison sentences were subsequently imposed in Pitt and Halifax Counties to begin at the expiration of the sentence imposed in Greene.

*T. W. Bruton, Attorney General, Theodore C. Brown, Jr., Staff Attorney for the State.*

*Turner and Harrison for petitioner.*

Per Curiam.

The .question presented by the writ is one of law. A sentence of seven to nine years upon a bill of indictment for an attempt to break and enter is not authorized. The crime charged is a misdemeanor. The maximum punishment for the offense is imprisonment for two years. The commitment issued by the Assistant Clerk of the Greene County Superior Court states, “The commitment was for breaking and entering.” The commitment must give way to the basic document— the indictment — which charges only an attempt to break and enter.

Ordinarily, when a judgment is imposed in excess of that permitted by law, the cause is remanded for a proper judgment. In this case the maximum sentence allowed has already been served. To send the case back for entry of a proper judgment would serve no useful purpose. The judgment in case No. 1377 entered in Greene County should be corrected by striking the term of imprisonment, “seven to nine years,” and substituting, “two years.”

*654The consecutive sentences subsequently imposed will fall into place on the basis of this correction. The cause is remanded to the Superior Court of Greene County for the correction of its record as here indicated. Certificate of the correction will be sent to the Prison Department.

Remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2110 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2110

      To address food and housing insecurity on college campuses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2019

Mr. Murphy (for himself, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms. Warren, and 
  Ms. Harris) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To address food and housing insecurity on college campuses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Closing the College Hunger Gap Act 
of 2019''.

SEC. 2. QUESTIONS ON FOOD AND HOUSING INSECURITY IN NATIONAL 
              POSTSECONDARY STUDENT AID STUDY.

    The Secretary of Education shall add questions that measure rates 
of food and housing insecurity to the National Postsecondary Student 
Aid Study.

SEC. 3. INFORMATION ON SNAP ELIGIBILITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 483 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1090) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Information on SNAP Eligibility.--
            ``(1) In general.--For each year for which a student 
        described in paragraph (2) submits a form described in 
        subsection (a), the Secretary shall send to such student 
        information regarding potential eligibility for assistance 
        under, and application process for, the supplemental nutrition 
        assistance program established under the Food and Nutrition Act 
        of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) in written and electronic form.
            ``(2) Students.--A student is described in this paragraph 
        if the student has an expected family contribution equal to 
        zero for the year.''.
    (b) Consultation.--The Secretary of Education shall consult with 
the Secretary of Agriculture, and the head of any other applicable 
Federal or State agency, in designing the written and electronic 
communication regarding potential eligibility for assistance under, and 
application process for, the supplemental nutrition assistance program 
established under the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et 
seq.) as described in section 483(i) of the Higher Education Act of 
1965 (20 U.S.C. 1090(i)).

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendment made by this Act shall take effect 120 
days after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         117,949
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,819,983
<ALLOWANCES>                                   469,000
<INVENTORY>                                  4,144,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,235,354
<PP&E>                                     109,927,228
<DEPRECIATION>                              61,270,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              84,762,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,618,715
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    14,183,493
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,508,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                84,762,519
<SALES>                                     88,670,994
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            88,670,994
<CGS>                                       70,781,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               70,781,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,596,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,143,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,149,496
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,890,192
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,259,304
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,259,304
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION





EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications



I am
the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of Your Event, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the“Company”).
I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter year ended February 28, 2014 and
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form
10-Q’).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Your Event, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies
to his knowledge that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                                   





|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Takahito Yasuki                                            
|Takahito Yasuki                                                
|Principal Executive Officer
        Principal Financial Officer
|                                                               
|April 11, 2014                                                 
|Date
##### 



EXHIBIT 14
 CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS OF
OHIO LEGACY CORP
  I. Honest and Ethical Conduct
  
    
    Encourage and reward professional integrity in all aspects of the financial
organization by eliminating inhibitions and barriers to responsible behavior, such as
coercion and fear of reprisal, with respect to reporting any matters contrary to
Company policy.
    
    Prohibit and eliminate the appearance or occurrence of conflicts between what is in
the best interest of the Company and what could result in material personal gain for an
employee of the Company, including Senior Financial Officers.
    
    Provide a mechanism for employees of the Company to inform the Board of Directors or
a committee appointed by the Board of deviations in practice from policies and
procedures governing honest and ethical behavior.
    
    Demonstrate their personal support for such policies and procedures through periodic
communication reinforcing these ethical standards throughout the Company.
 II. Financial Records and Periodic Reports
  
    
    Business transactions are properly authorized and completely, timely and accurately
recorded on the Companys books and records in accordance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (GAAP), Rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission, regulatory requirements and established Company policies.
    
    The retention or proper disposal of Company records shall be in accordance with
established Company financial policies and applicable legal and regulatory
requirements.
    
    Periodic financial communications and reports will be delivered in a manner that
facilitates the highest degree of clarity of content and meaning so that readers and
users will quickly and accurately determine their significance and consequence.
 -77-




---



##### 



III. Compliance with Applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations
  
    
    Educate members of the Company about any federal, state or local statute, regulation
or administrative procedure that affects the financial reporting operations of the
Company.
    
    Monitor the compliance of the finance affairs of the Company with any applicable
federal, state or local statute, regulation or administrative rule.
    
    Identify, report and correct in a swift and certain manner, any detected deviations
from applicable federal, state or local statute or regulation.
 IV. Accountability for Adherence to the Code of Conduct
   EXHIBIT A
 
 -78-
Case 3:10-cr-00068-LC-CJK   Document 128   Filed 09/25/14   Page 1 of 1
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-1047 HOWARD B. GARBER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE and CHICAGO BOARD OF TRADE,

Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of

Illinois in 04-CV-3238, Judge Ruben Castillo.

ON MOTION Before PROST, Circuit Judge. ORDER Howard B. Garber moves for an extension of time to file his opening brief and submits a "request for directions." The appellees' move for clarification that their brief is due February 17, 2009. Garber states that in addition to this appeal seeking review by this court, he also filed a notice of appeal seeking review by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Counsel "seeks this court's guidance on whether he should file his brief with the court under the current schedule, or alternatively await ruling from the Seventh Circuit, which may retain the case." We note that Garber filed his brief with this court on January 5, 2009. Absent a motion requesting that this appeal be stayed, the briefing schedule continues.Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motions are granted. The appellees' brief is due February 17, 2009. The request for directions is denied as moot. (3) The revised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT



### FEB 2 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT cc: Stephen Scallan, Esq. Jerrold E. Salzman, Esq. FEB (1 2 2009 s8 in;

2009-1047 - 2 -
Case 3:10-cr-00039-LC   Document 24   Filed 02/08/13   Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LE DISCOUNT SEAFOOD, INC.,

et al., on behalf of themselves and 

all others similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-106/RS-MD

BP, PLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Plaintiffs’ Motion for Emergency Relief (Doc. 21) and Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Interim Order Regarding Preservation of Evidence (Doc. 23) are denied.

ORDERED on June 14, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

                             LEISURE CONCEPTS, INC.

EXHIBIT 27     Financial Data Schedule

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                  Sep-30-1995
<CASH>                                          3,284,433
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,295,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                      217,157
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,339,258
<PP&E>                                          1,396,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,005,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,280,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,045,450
<BONDS>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                           29,448
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,272,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,280,338
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                2,990,339
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,237,183)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (962,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,275,183)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,275,183)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.42)
        




</TABLE>
# C_2012286EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 14 September 2012

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Central Bank of Ireland

(ECB/2012/20)

2012/C 286/01

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the Central Bank of Ireland’s current external auditors ended after the audit for the financial year 2011. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the Central Bank of Ireland’s current external auditors ended after the audit for the financial year 2011. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2012.

| (3) | The Central Bank of Ireland has selected RSM Farrell Grant Sparks as its external auditors for the financial years 2012 to 2016, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Central Bank of Ireland has selected RSM Farrell Grant Sparks as its external auditors for the financial years 2012 to 2016,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that RSM Farrell Grant Sparks should be appointed as the external auditors of the Central Bank of Ireland for the financial years 2012 to 2016.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 14 September 2012.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                    4,063
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            20,762
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                              93,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        122,311
<PP&E>                                   34,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          217,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   200,433
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      1
<OTHER-SE>                            (315,953)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            217,201
<SALES>                                 393,836
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        393,836
<CGS>                                   221,677
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           221,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       13,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (31,633)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (31,633)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                           (31,633)
<EPS-BASIC>                            (31,633)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SAMUEL WRIGHT,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 1:10-CV-91-SPM

US FOODSERVICE HEALTH AND WELFARE

BENEFITS PLAN DISABILITY PLAN,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Plaintiff's Notice of

Settlement (doc. 32). Pursuant to Northern District of Florida Local Rule 16.2(D),

it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. This case is hereby dismissed.

2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of 60 days, during

which time any party may move to reopen for good cause shown.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-eighth day of December, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge