alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company.    /s/ Ted R. Sharp DATE:  May 14, 2008 Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RED MOUNTAIN BANK, N.A.,

 Plaintiff,

vs.

TOP SHELF STORAGE II, LLC, et al.,

 Defendants.

 

CASE NO. 5:10-cv-104-RS/EMT

ORDER 

The unknown person or entity in possession of 105 Estes Place is terminated as a 

party pursuant to the order dated July 7, 2010 (Doc. 24). 

ORDERED on August 10, 2010. 

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6373

NICHOLAS W. JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus M. E. TUTHILL, Captain, CO, V; M. D. GAVIGAN, Sergeant, CO, III; L. BROWN, Officer, CO, II; JOHN SWIVEL, Officer, CO, II; R. CHERRY, Officer, CO, II; R. BURKER, Officer, CO, II; RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR., Commissioner; WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; MARYLAND DIVISION OF CORRECTION-PERSONNEL AND OFFICIALS; BOB FEENEY, Project Administrator, Correctional Medical Systems, Incorporated; STEPHEN MACK, Matt, Doc Adjustment Hearing Officer, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-2644-K) Submitted: June 12, 1997 Decided: June 18, 1997 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2Nicholas W. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Aron Uri Raskas, KRAMON & GRAHAM, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting him twenty days in which to submit the filing fee and denying him pro bono representation. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdictionbecause the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2009238EN.01000402.xml

| 3.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5594 — TNT Post Holding Deutschland/Georg von Holtzbrinck/JVS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 238/03

On 28 September 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5594. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5594. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
**Exhibit 99.1**

**STATEMENT OF THECHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF KNOLOGY, INC.****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. S. 1350**

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity asan officer of Knology, Inc. (the “Company”) that, to his knowledge, this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   March 31, 2003

|   |   |   |                                                           |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/RODGER L. JOHNSON                                           |
|   |   |   |                                                                |
|   |   |   | **Rodger L. Johnson****President and Chief Executive Officer** |

 

-1-
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference inRegistration Statement No. 333-136566 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement No. 333-89179 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-136570, 333-127113 and 333-103248 on Form S-8 of our reportdated March 20, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Knology, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005, appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 14, 2008
----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                       |   |   |                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Marie C Moffett                                                                                   |   |   | /s/      Rodger D  Spainhower                                                                                                 |
| Name: Marie      C MoffettTitle:      President and Chief Operating OfficerDate:      April 13 , 2009 |   |   | Name:      Rodger D SpainhowerTitle:      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:  April 13 ,      2009 |

----
#### ROUSE v. MAXWELL

No. 147 PC.

No. 68 (Fall Term).

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 538.

Petition by third-party defendant Simpson for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 30 July 1979.
# C_2011339EN.01000401.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/4

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting on 25 June 2010 concerning a preliminary draft decision in Case COMP/38.344 (2) — Prestressing Steel

2011/C 339/04

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the basic amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the basic amounts of the fines.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the mitigating and aggravating circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the mitigating and aggravating circumstances.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the amounts of reduction of the fines based on the 2002 Leniency Notice. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the amounts of reduction of the fines based on the 2002 Leniency Notice.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on inability to pay. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on inability to pay.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union.

---
Case 1:07-cv-03540-LTS-JCF Document 12 Filed 04/21/2008 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03540-LTS-JCF Document 12 Filed 04/21/2008 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009079EN.01000402.xml

| 2.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5492 — Oaktree/Apollo/Countrywide)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 79/05

On 26 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5492. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5492. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. S. 1350



The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  | 
|------------------------ |  | 
|Dated: November 20, 2003 |  | 
|                         |  | 
|                         |  |
Case 1:07-cv-03560-LAK Document 14 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1

      

  

   
  

  

  
    

    

    
      

      

      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

       

      

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement No. 333-237074 on Form S-1 of our report dated March 10, 2020, relating to the financial statements of Bionano
        Genomics, Inc. appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bionano Genomics, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2019.

       

      

      /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

       

      

      San Diego, California

    

    April 1, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ISSUER'S
INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED MARCH 31, 1999, SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING
FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U. S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                             227
<SECURITIES>                                        97
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,184
<ALLOWANCES>                                       393
<INVENTORY>                                      3,879
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,334
<PP&E>                                          33,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,867
<BONDS>                                          8,592
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           819
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,953
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,412
<SALES>                                         11,145
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,145
<CGS>                                            8,049
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    422
<INCOME-TAX>                                       181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                241
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       241
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JAMES ALEXANDER SMITH,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 5:10cv85/LAC/EMT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

______________________________/

O R D E R

Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and a

motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docs. 3, 4). From a review of the inmate bank account

records, Petitioner had an average monthly amount of $72.50 deposited into his prison account. 

Therefore, Petitioner shall be required to pay the $5.00 filing fee.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 4) is DENIED. 

2. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Petitioner shall

submit payment of $5.00 to the clerk of this court. The check should be made payable to “Clerk,

U.S. District Court.” Failure of Petitioner to either submit this amount or explain his inability to do

so may result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of May 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
# C_2009064EN.01001302.xml

| 19.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/13

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5438 — NBC Universal/De Agostini Communications/IMI Investimenti/Cattleya)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 64/04)

On 2 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5438. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5438. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Richard Douglas                                            |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Richard Douglas                                                      |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  June 14, 2010                                                        |
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-136566 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement No. 333-89179 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-136570, 333-127113 and 333-103248 on Form S-8 ofKnology, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Knology”) of our reports dated March 15, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Knology appearing in theCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 12, 2007
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-10      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-10      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 2 of 2