alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 1:07-cv-03560-LAK Document 12 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03560-LAK Document 12 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

VERNON COLBERT, 

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 5:10cv156/RS/EMT

JOHN PALMER, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (doc. 1). Plaintiff subsequently filed an

amended and second amended complaint (see docs. 32, 39). By order of this court dated February

21, 2012, Plaintiff was given thirty (30) days in which to a third amended complaint (doc. 44). 

Plaintiff failed to file a third amended complaint; therefore, on March 27, 2012, the court issued an

order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty-one (21) days, why this action should not be

dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court (doc. 46). The time for compliance with

the show cause order has now elapsed, and Plaintiff has failed to file a third amended complaint .

 Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 19th day of April 2012.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00156-RS-EMT Document 47 Filed 04/19/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 5:10cv156/RS/EMT

Case 5:10-cv-00156-RS-EMT Document 47 Filed 04/19/12 Page 2 of 2
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2011242EN.01004401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 19.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/44 |

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 242/04

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reference number of the State Aid | SA.32234 (11/X) | |
| Member State | Italy | |
| Member State reference number | — | |
| Name of the Region (NUTS) | CALABRIA Article 107(3)(c) | |
| Granting authority | | | | --- | | Regione Calabria | | Dipartimento Attività produttive | | Viale Cassiodoro — Palazzo Europa | | 88100 — Catanzaro | | www.regione.calabria.it | | |
| Title of the aid measure | Pacchetti integrati agevolati (P.I.A.) — 2008 | |
| National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication) | Legge regionale dell’11/5/2007, no 9 art.24 Deliberazione GR 220 del 19 marzo 2008, n 220 Decreto del DG Attività Produttive del 30/6/2008 no 8452 | |
| Type of measure | Scheme | |
| Amendment of an existing aid measure | — | |
| Duration | 1.1.2009—31.12.2013 | |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid | |
| Type of beneficiary | SME | |
| Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme | EUR 22,00 (in millions) | |
| For guarantees | — | |
| Aid Instrument (Article 5) | Interest subsidy,Direct grant | |
| Reference to the Commission Decision | — | |
| If co-financed by Community funds | POR Calabria FESR 2007-2013 CCI n. 2007 IT 161 Po 008 decisione della commisione europea C (2007) 6322 del 7/12/2007 — EUR 43,00 (in millions) | |
| Objectives | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in national currency | SME-bonuses in % |
| SME investment and employment aid (Art.15) | 20 % | — |

Web link to the full text of the aid measure:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | http://www.regione.calabria.it/sviluppo/index.php?option=com\_content&task=view&id=16&Itemid=19 |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | http://www.artigiancassa.it/artigiani/agevolazioni/Pagine/PIA.aspx |

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 07, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, May 07, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0356. IN THE INTEREST OF: T. W., A CHILD (FATHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Juvenile Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 13JV1257 13JV1253
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSEPH A. ARMSTRONG

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-117/RS-GRJ

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,

et. al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s motion to extend time (Doc. 24). Not later than 

October 15, 2010, the parties shall file an amended Rule 26 joint report consistent 

with a February 1, 2011, discovery deadline and a trial date of April 11, 2011.

ORDERED on October 1, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit No. 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Title Starts Online, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the undersigned’s knowledge:





(1)   the Report of the Company filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: August 11, 2009
By:
/s/Mark DeFoorName: Mark DeFoorTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of WindTamer Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Gerald E. Brock, as
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ GERALD E. BROCKGerald
      E. BrockChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerAugust
      10, 2009





This
Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 
 
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 
 
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 
 
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of EXPLORE ANYWHERE HOLIDNG CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bryan Hammond,CEO and Member of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date: July 1, 2011
 
 
 By: /s/ Bryan Hammond
 
 
 Name: Bryan Hammond
 
 
 Title: CEO and Member of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2009192EN.01001401.xml

| 15.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 192/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 192/14

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 August 2009

2009/C 192/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4294 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,61 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4444 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86160 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,1835 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5267 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6165 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,733 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 269,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7000 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1240 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2130 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1160 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6939 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5509 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0784 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0785 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0628 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 769,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5152 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7688 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3120 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 246,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0279 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,695 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,1200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,635 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6020 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3544 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,9610 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4294

JPY

Japanese yen

135,61

DKK

Danish krone

7,4444

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86160

SEK

Swedish krona

10,1835

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5267

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6165

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,733

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

269,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7000

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1240

RON

Romanian leu

4,2130

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1160

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6939

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5509

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0784

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0785

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0628

KRW

South Korean won

1 769,06

ZAR

South African rand

11,5152

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7688

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3120

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 246,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0279

PHP

Philippine peso

68,695

RUB

Russian rouble

45,1200

THB

Thai baht

48,635

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6020

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3544

INR

Indian rupee

68,9610

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# CE2013251EN.01021201.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 251/212 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 251/212

---

Wednesday 14 March 2012International Cocoa Agreement 2010 ***

P7_TA(2012)0081

European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 March 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the International Cocoa Agreement 2010 (09771/2011 – C7-0206/2011 – 2010/0343(NLE))

2013/C 251 E/32

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (09771/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (09771/2011),

| — | having regard to the draft International Cocoa Agreement 2010 (08134/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft International Cocoa Agreement 2010 (08134/2011),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(3) and (4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0206/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(3) and (4) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0206/2011),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0024/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0024/2012),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---
# C_2011039EN.01000501.xml

| 8.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/5

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 39/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 30.11.2009 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | N 567/09 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Region | País Vasco |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Ayudas a la creación, desarrollo y producción audiovisual. |
| Legal basis | Orden de 4 de mayo de 2009, de la Consejera de Cultura, por la que se convoca la concesión de ayudasa la creación, desarrollo y producción audiovisual |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Culture |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | | Annual budget: EUR 2,53 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

30.11.2009

Reference number of State Aid

N 567/09

Member State

Spain

Region

País Vasco

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Ayudas a la creación, desarrollo y producción audiovisual.

Legal basis

Orden de 4 de mayo de 2009, de la Consejera de Cultura, por la que se convoca la concesión de ayudasa la creación, desarrollo y producción audiovisual

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Culture

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Annual budget: EUR 2,53 million

| | Overall budget: EUR 2,53 million |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 2,53 million

Intensity

50 %

Duration (period)

1.1.2009-31.3.2010

Economic sectors

Media

Name and address of the granting authority

| Dirección de Promoción de la Cultura |
| --- |
| Departamento de Cultura |
| Gobierno Vasco |
| C/ Donostia-San Sebastián, 1 |
| 01010 Vitoria-Gasteiz |
| ESPAÑA |

Dirección de Promoción de la Cultura

Departamento de Cultura

Gobierno Vasco

C/ Donostia-San Sebastián, 1

01010 Vitoria-Gasteiz

ESPAÑA

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
# C_2009129EN.01000101.xml

| 6.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/1

---

2009/C 129/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 113, 16.5.2009

OJ C 113, 16.5.2009

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 102, 1.5.2009

OJ C 90, 18.4.2009

OJ C 82, 4.4.2009

OJ C 69, 21.3.2009

OJ C 55, 7.3.2009

OJ C 44, 21.2.2009

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESAR Y. CATIBAYAN, a U.S. citizen,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

SYCIP GORRES VELAYO & CO.,

(SGV), a Philippine Accounting Firm,

AKA SGV/Ernst & Young, (SGV/EY),

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-35989

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-00273-HU

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Marco A. Hernandez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 22, 2015** 

Before: HAWKINS, GRABER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Cesar Y. Catibayan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his diversity action for lack of personal jurisdiction over SyCip Gorres

Velayo & Co. (“SGV”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

FILED

JUL 01 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
de novo, Picot v. Weston, 780 F.3d 1206, 1211 (9th Cir. 2015), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Catibayan’s action for lack of personal

jurisdiction because Catibayan failed to establish that SGV had sufficient contacts

with Oregon such that maintenance of the suit there would not offend due process. 

See Or. R. Civ. P. 4(L); Walden v. Fiore, 134 S. Ct. 1115, 1121-23 (2014) (specific

jurisdiction requires a defendant to have certain minimum contacts with the forum

state); Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Techs., Inc., 647 F.3d 1218, 1223-24 (9th Cir.

2011) (general jurisdiction requires a defendant to have “continuous and

systematic general business contacts” with the forum state (citation and internal

quotation marks omitted)); Gray & Co. v. Firstenberg Machinery Co., 913 F.2d

758, 760 (9th Cir. 1990) (per curiam) (Oregon’s long-arm statute allows for

jurisdiction over non-residents coextensive with due process requirements).

We do not consider documents and facts not presented to the district court. 

See United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts

not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

Catibayan’s motion to expedite is denied as moot.

Catibayan’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

AFFIRMED.

2 13-35989
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 234 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 234

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require the disclosure of 
    the annual percentage rates applicable to Federal student loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 2019

  Mr. Enzi (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, and Ms. Ernst) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require the disclosure of 
    the annual percentage rates applicable to Federal student loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency in Student Lending 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRED DISCLOSURES.

    Section 455(p) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087e(p)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Each institution'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--Each institution''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Disclosure of apr prior to disbursement.--In addition 
        to the disclosures required under paragraph (1), each 
        institution and contractor described in such paragraph shall 
        disclose to a borrower before disbursement of a loan made under 
        this part, in writing and in a form the borrower may keep, the 
        annual percentage rate applicable to the loan, taking into 
        account--
                    ``(A) the amount of the loan;
                    ``(B) the stated interest rate of the loan;
                    ``(C) the standard term for a loan of the same 
                type;
                    ``(D) any fees or additional costs associated with 
                the loan; and
                    ``(E) any capitalization of interest on the 
                loan.''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 99.4**
ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 5) PLC
     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Barclay Bank PLC (the“Bank”), as Servicer, pursuant to the Beneficiaries Servicing Agreement, datedas of November 23, 1999 ( the “Agreement”), among the Bank, as Servicer andBarclaycard Funding PLC, as Investor Beneficiary, does hereby certify that:
     1. The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have theirrespective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.
     2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.
     3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2003 was conducted under my supervision.
     4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations under theAgreement throughout such calendar year and no material default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuingexcept as set forth in the Paragraph 5 below.
     5. The following is a description of each material default in the performance of the Servicer’s obligations under the provisions ofthe Agreement known to the undersigned to have been made by the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2003, whichsets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such defaultand (iii) the current status of each such default:
     None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this AnnualServicer’s Certificate this 21st day of June, 2004.   Barclays Bank PLCas ServicerBy: /s/ Richard Francis Sommers Name: Richard Francis Sommers Title: Finance Director
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Forever Valuable Collectibles, Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Jodi Stevens, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.   Date: July 19, 2011By:/s/ Jodi StevensJodi StevensChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer