alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of EMPERIAL AMERICAS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Alonzo Pierce, Principal
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: AUGUST 23, 2012 | By:                                     | /s/Alonzo Pierce
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------- | ----------------
|                      | Alonzo Pierce                          
|                      | President, CEO, Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel, I/START Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 9, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852. (Virtual Meeting)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Mark Swieter, PhD, Chief, Training and Special Projects Review Branch, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Suite 200, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, (301) 435-1389,                         *ms80x@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 24, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5392 Filed 10-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### APPEAL OF DONALD BRENT WILLETT From the Decision of the Refund Committee of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro to claim his North Carolina Income Tax Refund under the Set-Off Debt Collection Act

No. 249PA82

(Filed 5 October 1982)

On 12 May 1982 we granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 (1981) to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, 56 N.C. App. 584, 289 S.E. 2d 576 (1982), that affirmed the order of *Judge Darius B. Herring, Jr.,*entered at the 27 May 1981 Session of Superior Court, DURHAM County.

The main question presented in this appeal is whether the University of North Carolina must provide a hearing in conformance with the Administrative Procedure Act, G.S. 150A-23 to -37 (1978), when it seeks to setoff a student’s debt against the student’s state income tax refund under the Setoff Debt Collection Act, G.S. 105A-1 to -16 (1979).

*Attorney General Rufus L. Edmisten, by Associate Attorney David E. Broome, Jr., for the State.*

*Michael W. Willis, for the petitioner-appellee.*

PER CURIAM.

The facts in this case are set out at length in the Court of Appeals’ opinion reported at 56 N.C. App. 584, 289 S.E. 2d 576 (1982). After reviewing the record and briefs and hearing oral arguments on the question presented, we conclude that the petition for further review was improvidently granted. The order granting discretionary review is vacated. The decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the actions of the trial court remains undisturbed and in full force and effect.

Discretionary review improvidently granted.
Case 7:07-cv-03537-CLB Document 8 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           9,585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    171,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               225,380
<PP&E>                                         216,889
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 619,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          283,143
<BONDS>                                        278,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (90,893)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   619,984
<SALES>                                        465,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               465,274
<CGS>                                          256,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  256,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               209,206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,641
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (27,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,659
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (17,754)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,002)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (19,756)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (19,756)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### ROUSE v. MAXWELL

No. 68.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 538.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 28 June 1979 (297 N.C. 612) and petition by third-party defendant Simpson for writ of certiorari allowed 30 July 1979 (297 N.C. 698) vacated 6 November 1979. Petition by defendant Maxwell for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 filed 7 May 1979 and petition by defendant Simpson for writ of certiorari filed 9 July 1979 denied 6 November 1979. The proceedings in this cause in the Supreme Court dismissed 6 November 1979.
# C_2011251EN.01000301.xml

| 27.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/3

---

Final Report of the Hearing Officer (1)

1

Case COMP/39.796 — Suez Environnement — Breach of seal

2011/C 251/03

This case concerns an infringement of procedural competition rules by the French group Suez Environnement Company SA (‘Suez Environnement’) and its subsidiary Lyonnaise des eaux France SA (‘LDE’) as a result of a breach of a seal affixed during an inspection by the Commission of LDE's headquarters in April 2010.

On 19 October 2010, the Commission adopted a Statement of Objections, which was notified to Suez Environnement and LDE on 21 October 2010. The Statement of Objections came to the preliminary conclusion that a seal affixed at LDE's headquarters during the inspection conducted by the Commission in April 2010 had been broken within the meaning of Article 23(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 and that the Commission intended to impose a fine on LDE and Suez Environnement under that Article. The Statement of Objections also indicated that the Commission intended to hold Suez Environnement liable for the infringement committed by LDE.

On 8 December 2010, the parties, having been granted access to the Commission's case file, submitted their comments in reply to the Statement of Objections. I have not been informed of any incident relating to access to the file.

In their written comments, the parties did not contest that an infringement had taken place, but stated that the infringement had been committed as a result of negligence. They also argued, as a mitigating factor, that they had actively cooperated with the Commission once the breach of seal was discovered. The parties did not contest that liability for the infringement could be attributed to Suez Environnement.

In their written comments, the parties also indicated that they did not wish to exercise their right to a formal oral hearing.

After having examined the Commission's draft decision, I hereby confirm that the parties have been heard on all objections contained therein.

In conclusion, I consider that the right to be heard has been respected in this case.

Brussels, 3 May 2011.

Wouter WILS

---

(1)  Pursuant to Article 15 and 16 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to
his knowledge, this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: October 26, 2011



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Robert K. Mills    
|Robert K. Mills        
|Chief Financial Officer

This exhibit shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and
irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.
---

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

I, James Campbell, President and Chief Executive Officer of
Rockwell Diamonds Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2011 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| | By:    | /s/ J. Campbell                      
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| |        |                                      
| | Name:  | James Campbell                       
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer
| |        |                                      
| | Date:  | September 6, 2011                    

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CURTIS LEON DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00095-MP-GRJ

SADIE DARNELL, KENNETH ALAN HOLT, ALLISON MAGEE, STEPHEN MAYNARD,

MATTHEW STRANG, JOSHUA J ZINGG,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 27, Motion for Extension of Time to File

Objections by Curtis Leon Davis. Plaintiff moves the Court for a sixty-day extension of time to

respond to the magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation. Plaintiff is a pro se litigant and

has limited access to the law library. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time, Doc. 27, is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff may file objections to the report and recommendation on or before

December 16, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00095-MP-GRJ Document 28 Filed 10/18/11 Page 1 of 1
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 1:10-cv-00071-MP -GRJ Document 3 Filed 04/21/10 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:10-cv-00071-MP -GRJ Document 3 Filed 04/21/10 Page 2 of 2
#### MATTHEWS, CREMINS, McLEAN, INC. v. NICHTER

No. 292 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 184.

Petition by defendant Gaskell for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1979.
IJNI'l'bXI STATES DISTRIC'I' COl.rRT 

SOU'l'HERN DlSTRIC-S OF NEW YORK 

1. 1 

USDCSDNY i 

\ 

1 DOCUMENT 1 

1' 1, ELECTRONICALLY FIEE 

JU RE: 

j \,lASl'ER F1I.F 

FOSAMAX PKOII1;C''I'S LlrIB1LLI'Y L,ITIGATION 

i 1106-hII1-1789 (JFK) 

Thi.7 110cum~nt Ke1lrtv.s To '4 11 Actions 

ORDER FOR AnbIISSlOh' I'HO H.AC VICE 

Considering the Ccl-t i ticntc of Ciood Standing and all othcr docu~ncnts rcquired by case 

Managemen1 Order Nu. 5 subrnittcd by counsel. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

:\p~.>licant's Name: Herbert G. Smith 11 

Firm Narnc: Venable LLP 

City/Statc//.ip: Washington. DC 20004 

Email Address: hgsrnith~~venable.corn 

is admitted to practice prv hau \,ice as counsel Ibr llerck & Co.. luc. in tl~c LZ~CIL'C captiilncd C~SC 

in the United Stales District Court ti~r Ihe Suulheru District of Kcw York. 

Dated: ~arcdY 2008 

Ncw York. Neu \I'ot-k 

V United States District ~ud& 

Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 25 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
United States District Court 

for the District of Columbia 

CLERK'S OFFICE 

333 Constitution Avenue, NFV 

Washington, DC 20001 

I, NANCY M. MAYER-WHITTINCTON, Clerk nf the United St;itc\ 

Dir;triot CO~II? i;)r the District of Columbia, clo hereby ccrlil'y thac: 

HERBERrI' G. SMITH, I1 

was, on thc 5"' day of May A.D. 1907 ;~drnj~tcd tu practice as an Attorney 

211 Law at the Bar ol- thik Court, and is. ;lccorcliug to the records of this Court, a 

mernber of haid Bur ill pod branding. 

In T'htin~uny Whereof, 1 hcrcunto suhscri bc my name :~nd affix thc sci~l or said Court 

in the City ul' Washington this 29''' day oi' February A.U. 2008. 

Case 1:07-cv-03461-JFK Document 25 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
---

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerhard Jacobs, Chief Financial Officer of Rockwell Diamonds
Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 20-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended February 28, 2010 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

By:        /s/ GJ Jacobs
            
________________________________Name:   Gerhard
JacobsTitle:     Chief Financial
Officer
  Date:     August 31, 2010

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [UT050-1610-012J]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Correction. 

# SUMMARY:

The following corrections are made: Comments should be sent to the Richfield Field Office. Comments and information submitted on the Richfield Field Office DRMP/DEIS, including names, e-mail addresses, and street addresses of respondents, will be available for public review and disclosure at the Richfield Field Office address listed below. Or, you may contact Cornell Christensen, RMP Project Manager, Richfield BLM Field Office, 150 East 900 North, Richfield, Utah 84701, phone 435-896-1561.

All other information within the Notice of Availability (10/26/07) remains unchanged.

Dated: October 30, 2007.

Kent Hoffman, 

Acting Utah State Director.

[FR Doc. 07-5470 Filed 11-02-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-DK-M