alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:10cr30/MCR

ROBERT E. BOURLIER

/

WRIT OF EXECUTION

On or about October 12, 2011, this Court issued a restitution judgment against

defendant Robert E. Bourlier, in the above entitled and numbered case in the Northern

District of Florida, for a total of approximately $35,562.30 and $14,300 n special

monetary assessments. ECF No. 330. As of today’s date, the sum due on said

restitution judgment is approximately $32,562.30, and the special monetary

assessment has expired and is therefore no longer due and payable.

Defendant debtor’s name and last known address is Robert E. Bourlier, #07366-

017, FCI Butner, Post Office Box 1500, Butner, North Carolina 27509

On or about November 12, 2016, the government filed a Petition for Writ of

Execution, seeking a Writ against a pair of Stamped 14KT yellow gold lady’s cast

earrings and friction post with a bright polish finish – three bezel set round

Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 503 Filed 11/15/16 Page 1 of 4
Page 2 of 4

brilliant cut diamonds and twelve bead set round brilliant cut diamonds. ECF

No. 502. 

IN CONSIDERATION of the government’s Petition for Writ of Execution and

finding good cause therein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall without delay

levy property of the defendant Robert E. Bourlier, said property being: a pair of

Stamped 14KT yellow gold lady’s cast earrings and friction post with a bright

polish finish – three bezel set round brilliant cut diamonds and twelve bead set

round brilliant cut diamonds.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal may recover his

costs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall record the

hour and date this Writ was received and make a return of this Writ within ninety days

of issue describing the date and time of the levy, a description of the property, and

action taken. The United States Marshal shall record any costs, expenses and fees

incurred.

Case No. 3:10cr30/MCR

Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 503 Filed 11/15/16 Page 2 of 4
Page 3 of 4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal and/or the United

States Attorney shall serve the defendant and all persons having an interest in the

property with a copy of the Petition for Writ of Execution, this Writ of Execution, and

the clerk’s Notice.

DONE and ORDERED this 15th day of November, 2016. 

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cr30/MCR

Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 503 Filed 11/15/16 Page 3 of 4
Page 4 of 4

 

MARSHAL’S RETURN

Date and Hour Writ received: 

 

Date and Hour Writ executed: 

 

Description of property and action taken: 

 

 

 

Marshal’s costs, expenses and fees: 

 

 

Date of Return: 

A copy of the Government’s Petition, the Clerk’s Notice(s) for the property seized

and the Writ(s) for the property seized were provided to: 

EDWARD M. SPOONER

UNITED STATES MARSHAL

By:

DEPUTY U.S. MARSHAL

Case No. 3:10cr30/MCR

Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 503 Filed 11/15/16 Page 4 of 4
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quadra Projects Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended February 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Claude Diedrick, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

/s/ Claude DiedrickClaude DiedrickPresident, Chief Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial Officer, Treasurer and DirectorDate: November 27, 2009

---
#### STATE v. NEELEY

No. 259PA82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 211.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 2 June 1982.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 125 (Friday, June 29, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-55505]

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 273

Standards for Universal Waste Management

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 266 to 299, 
revised as of July 1, 2006, in Sec.  273.9, on page 463, in 
alphabetical order, reinstate the definition of ``On-site'' to read as 
follows:

Sec.  273.9  Definitions.

* * * * *
    On-site means the same or geographically contiguous property which 
may be divided by public or private right-of-way, provided that the 
entrance and exit between the properties is at a cross-roads 
intersection, and access is by crossing as opposed to going along the 
right of way. Non-contiguous properties owned by the same person but 
connected by a right-of-way which he controls and to which the public 
does not have access, are also considered on-site property.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 07-55505 Filed 6-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of League Now Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mario Barton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated: November 22, 2010
By:
/s/ Mario BartonMario BartonChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
  A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

November 1 2 , 2019

ERRAT A

______________________ Appeal No s . 2018

- 2082, 2018

- 2083, 2018

- 2084

BEDGEAR, LLC, Appellant

v.

FREDMAN BROS. FURNIT URE COMPANY, INC., Appellee

______________________

Decided: November 7 , 2019

Nonprecedential Opinion

_______________________ Please make the following change:

On page 10, lines 3

– 4, replace “PTO Director/Under

Secretary of Commerce” with “Secretary of Commerce.”
#### BOARD OF TRANSPORTATION v. REVIS

No. 85 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 182.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1979.
Doc 

United States District Court

Southern District of New York

Office of the Clerk

U.S. Courthouse

500 Pearl Street, New York, N.Y. 10007-1213

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X

 

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

 

Egleston

 v. Mosingo et al

 05cv4950

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 

 

Pursuant to the memorandum of the Case Processing Assistant, the aboveentitled action is reassigned to the calendar of

 JUDGE Mukasey

 

All future documents submitted in this action are to be presented in the

Clerk=s Office of the Southern District Court for filing and shall bear the assigned

judge=s initials after the case number.

The attorney(s) for the plaintiff(s) are requested to serve a copy of the Notice

of Reassignment on all defendants.

J. Michael McMahon, CLERK

Dated: 

07/7/05

By: Jenny R. Horne

 Deputy Clerk 

 

 

 

cc: Attorneys of Record 

Case 1:05-cv-04950-MBM Document 6 Filed 07/07/2005 Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ERICA FRAZIER, CRYSTAL STUKES-LEWIS, BIANCA PRICE, 

VENICAL CANADAY, LASHAWN WEST, LAPORSCHA LAWSON, 

CHATOYA HARRIS, EBONY KEELS, On behalf of themselves 

individually, and their minor children, AND OTHER SIMILARLY 

SITUATED RESIDENTS,

Appellants,

v.

GMF-STONYBROOK, L.L.C., GMF-PRESERVATION OF 

AFFORDABILITY CORP., STONYBROOK FL, L.L.C. a/k/a

MILLENNIA HOUSING MANAGEMENT, LTD., LLC/MILLENNIA 

COMPANIES, and THE CITY OF RIVERA BEACH, FLORIDA, a 

Municipality in the State of Florida,

Appellees.

No. 4D20-666

[March 4, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Howard K. Coates, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502018CA009696XXXXMB.

Malik Leigh of Watson Leigh, P.A., Pompano Beach, for appellant.

Mahra Sarofsky and Jonathan S. Glickman of Slusher & Rosenblum, 

P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee GMF-Stonybrook, LLC.

Katina M. Hardee of Fowler White Burnett, P.A., Miami, for appellee 

Stonybrook FL, LLC, and Millennia Housing Management LTD, LLC.

Christy L. Goddeau of Torcivia, Donlon, Goddeau & Ansay, P.A., West 

Palm Beach, for appellee City of Riviera Beach.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
2

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2424 

To reauthorize the Young Women’s Breast Health Education and Awareness 

Requires Learning Young Act of 2009. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2019 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Young Women’s Breast Health Education 

and Awareness Requires Learning Young Act of 2009. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘EARLY Act Reauthor5 ization of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2424 IS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE YOUNG WOMEN’S 

2 BREAST HEALTH EDUCATION AND AWARE3 NESS REQUIRES LEARNING YOUNG ACT OF 

4 2009. 

5 Section 399NN(h) of the Public Health Service Act 

6 (42 U.S.C. 280m(h)) is amended by striking ‘‘$4,900,000 

7 for each of fiscal years 2015 through 2019’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘$9,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2020 through 2024’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      David
      M. McCarthy, Chief Executive Officer of Z-II, Inc. (the ”Company”), hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      quarterly period ended March 31, 2008 (“the Company Form 10-Q”) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act
      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the Company
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                David M. McCarthy
            
            May 13, 2008David M. McCarthy - Chief Executive Officer
            
            Date
# C_2013044EN.01015801.xml

| 15.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/158 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/158

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Amendment to the Commission proposal COM(2011) 626 final/3 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)’

COM(2012) 535 final — 2012/0281 (COD)

2013/C 44/29

On 22 October and 24 October 2012, the European Parliament and the Council respectively decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Amendment to the Commission proposal COM(2011) 626 final/3 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)

Amendment to the Commission proposal COM(2011) 626 final/3 for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)

COM(2012) 535 final — 2012/0281 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided at its 485th plenary session of 12 and 13 December 2012 (meeting of 12 December 2012), by 124 votes, with 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 12 December 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CEDRIC JONES,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10-CV-116-SPM/WCS

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER 

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Parties’ Motions (docs. 17, 18) to

permit the use of laptop computers, cell phones, video equipment, and computer

equipment at the courthouse during the trial, and Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion (doc. 19)

to allow the use of video depositions. Upon consideration, the Motions (docs. 17, 18,

19) are hereby GRANTED.

SO ORDERED this first day of March, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ali Jenab, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SourceForge, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SourceForge, Inc.

|Date: December 7, 2007 | By:    | /s/ ALI JENAB                        
|---------------------- | ------ | -------------------------------------
|                       | Name:  | Ali Jenab                            
|                       | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President

---
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION  I, Ted R. Sharp, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  August 17, 2007  By:   /s/  Ted R. Sharp Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.      1
EXHIBIT 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   Date:   June 30, 2006   By   /s/ Ted R. Sharp  Ted R, Sharp, Chief Financial Officer          1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ROBERT LEE HONG,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-155-SPM-WCS

WALTER MCNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Second

Report and Recommendation (doc. 53). The Parties have been furnished copies

and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United

States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed an objection (doc. 59) asserting that

this case, challenging this high level of soy in the food served in prison,

necessitates class certification and the appointment of counsel to represent the

Plaintiff. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have

conducted a de novo review of the sections of the report to which objections have

been made. I find that the Plaintiff is not and adequate class representative, that

appointment of counsel is not warranted in this case, and that the Report and

Recommendation is correct and should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 53) is

Case 4:10-cv-00155-SPM-WCS Document 62 Filed 05/24/11 Page 1 of 2
adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion to certify this case as a class action and to appoint

counsel (doc. 50) is denied.

3. This case is remanded to the Magistrate Judge for further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-fourth day of May, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00155-SPM-WCS Document 62 Filed 05/24/11 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RUBEN C. FERNANDEZ-OLIVARES,

 Plaintiff,

vs. 5:10cv55/RS/MD

PMI EMPLOYEE LEASING, INC..

 Defendants.

O R D E R

This case is before the court upon plaintiff’s filing of a complaint pursuant to Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has paid the $350.00

filing fee in this case. Plaintiff is informed that it is his responsibility to formally serve the

complaint so that defendant may be given an opportunity to respond to the plaintiff's

allegations. The clerk shall be directed to issue summons so that plaintiff may effect

service. Plaintiff should review Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 which governs the

issuance of summons, use of waiver of service forms, and sets forth the requirements for

service of process. In particular, he should review Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d) and 4(h). Plaintiff will

be provided with both a summons and the forms for waiver of service so he may proceed

under whichever provision he chooses.

Plaintiff is further informed that although some latitude is afforded pro se litigants,

he should endeavor to serve the summons and complaint within 120 days from the date

of filing the complaint, or the cause may be dismissed. See FED.R.CIV.P. 4(m). 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1.The clerk of court shall forthwith issue a summons for the defendant PMI

Employee Leasing and deliver the summons to plaintiff, who shall be responsible for

prompt service of the summons and amended complaint on the defendant. The clerk shall
Page 2 of 2

also forward to plaintiff a copy of the forms AO-398 and AO-399 in the event plaintiff elects

to serve the complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) (waiver of formal service). 

2. After a response to the complaint has been filed by the defendant, the plaintiff

shall be required to mail to the attorney for the defendant a copy of every pleading or other

paper submitted by him for consideration by the court. The plaintiff shall include with each 

original paper to be filed with the clerk of court a "certificate of service" which states the

date a correct copy of the paper was mailed to the defendant or to the attorney

representing the defendant. Any paper submitted for filing after a response to the

complaint has been filed by any defendant which does not contain a "certificate of service"

shall be returned by the clerk and disregarded by the court.

3. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(2), the clerk shall forward to the plaintiff

a form for consenting to trial by the magistrate judge, with the case number written on it. 

If plaintiff wishes to consent he should sign the form and forward it to counsel for the

defendant, who shall return it to the clerk only if defendant consents. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13TH day of April, 2010.

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 5:10CV55/RS/MD