alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WILLIAM A. GADD,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:09cv562/LAC/EMT

WALTER A. McNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated April 6, 2011 (Doc. 24). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion to voluntary dismiss (Doc. 23) is GRANTED and this case is

DISMISSED without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9 day of May, 2011. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:09-cv-00562-LC-EMT Document 27 Filed 05/09/11 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act 2002**

 

I, BryanNeedham, director of ONO Finance PLC, certify that to the best of my knowledge(i) the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information containedin the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of ONO Finance PLC.

 
| By:                           | /s/ Bryan  Needham |   |
|-------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
| **Name:  Bryan Needham** |
| **Title:  Director**     |
| **Date:**                     |

 

----
#### STATE v. LEA

No. 148 PC.

Case below: 17 N.C. App. 71.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 February 1973.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOHN D. SOUTER, JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv65/MCR/EMT

WARDEN ELLIS, et al.,

 Defendants.

_________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 28, 2010. (Doc. 24). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default (doc. 21) and motion for default judgment

(doc. 23) are DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of August, 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

______________________ 

CURTIS BULLICK,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2013-3121

______________________ 

Petition for review of an arbitrator's decision in No. 

121103-00362-3 by Robert H. Brunner.

______________________ 

O R D E R

The petitioner having failed to respond to this court's 

October 30, 2013 order,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The petition is dismissed. Each side shall bear its 

own costs. 

Case: 13-3121 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 11/22/2013
2 BULLICK v. AIR FORCE

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court 

s8

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: November 22, 2013

Case: 13-3121 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 11/22/2013
Opinion issued January 15, 2015
.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 14
- 00 903
- CV

——————————— IN RE BRIDGETTE MASSEY , Relator

O riginal Proceeding o n Petition fo r W rit of M andamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, Bridgette Massey , has filed a petition for writ of mandamus , contending that respondent, the Honorable Donald L. Kraemer , abused his
discretion in denying her motion to transfer venue and granting temporary orders
in a suit affecting the parent

- child relationship

. 1

1 The underlying case i s In the Interest of M.D.M.E. , a Child , Cause No. 18 14 , in the 12th District Court of Grimes County , Texas, the Honorable Donald L. Kraemer presiding.2 We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We deny all pending motions as

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings , Ma ssengale , and Lloyd

.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7414** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.

WILLIAM HAYWOOD HOUCK , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. ( 7:12

- cr
- 00127

- D

- 2 )

Submitted : December 15, 2015 Decided: December 18, 2015

Before GREGORY and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

William Haywood Houck , Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray , Jennifer P. May

- Parker , Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh , North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublis hed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Haywood Houck appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction

of sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversibl e error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Houck , No. 7:12

- cr
- 00127

- D

- 2
(E.D.N.C. filed Aug. 28, 2015 & entered Aug. 31, 2015).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 13.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the Annual  Report of  CityView  Corporation  Limited  (the
"Company")  on Form 20-F for the fiscal  year ended  December  31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Ee Beng Yew, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.







By: /s/ Ee Beng Yew
    -------------------------------------
    Ee Beng Yew
    June 28, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

CASE NO.: 1:10cr27/SPM/GRY

vs.

CARLINE CENEUS

a/k/a “Carline Bontemps,”

CABIOCH BONTEMPS,

and

WILLY PAUL EDOUARD

______________________________/

MOTION OF DEFENDANT CARLINE CENEUS TO ADOPT CODEFENDANT’S MOTION

COMES NOW Defendant, CARLINE CENEUS, by and through undersigned 

counsel, and requests this Court’s permission to adopt the following motion:

1. Defendant Edouard’s Motion to Suppress (Doc. # 186).

filed on behalf of Co-Defendant WILLY PAUL EDOUARD. The purpose for allowing 

the adoption is to avoid duplicitous motions and for the sake of judicial economy. This 

request is made in good faith and not for the purposes of unnecessary delay or harassment.

WHEREFORE, Defendant CARLINE CENEUS respectfully requests the entry of 

an Order granting permission to adopt the above-mentioned motions filed on behalf of 

the Co-Defendant.

RESPECTFULLY submitted this 9th day of January, 2012.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

electronically filed with CM/ECF which will provide a copy to Adriana Vieco, U.S. 

Department of Justice, 601 D Street NW, Room 5542, Washington D.C., 20530, 

Frank Williams, Office of the US Attorney, 300 E. University Ave., Suite 310, 

Gainesville, FL 32601, Huntley Johnson, 226 S.W. 2nd St. Gainesville, FL 32601, and 

Darren Johnson, Federal Public Defender’s Office, 101 SE 2nd Pl., Gainesville, FL

32601 this 9th day of January, 2012.

/s/ Lloyd L. Vipperman, Jr.

________________________

Lloyd L. Vipperman, Jr.

Attorney for Defendant

FL Bar # 0285609

P.O. Box 2133

Gainesville, FL 32602

(352) 377-3454

Fax: (352) 379-2976
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case Nos. 3:10cr6/MCR/CJK

3:11cv426/MCR/CJK

RONALD L. PHARES

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May 28, 2014. (Doc.344). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc. 314) is DENIED.

2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of September, 2014.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cr-00006-MCR-CJK Document 355 Filed 09/08/14 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ROBERT L DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00150-MP-WCS

MARK HASTY, BILL MCCOLLUM, WALTER A MCNEIL,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 5, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, recommending that this action be dismissed as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The

time for filing objections has passed, and none have been filed. The Court agrees with the

Magistrate Judge that this action should be dismissed. It is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and incorporated

herein.

Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, doc. 2, is DENIED pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g), and Plaintiff’s complaint, doc. 1, is DISMISSED without prejudice. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to note on the docket that this cause was dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of August, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JEFF ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:09cv344-SPM/WCS

WILLIAM N MEGGS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an order filed October

23, 2009, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint and to submit another IFP

motion (for use by non-prisoners) by November 20, 2009. Plaintiff was specifically

warned that a recommendation would be made that this case be dismissed if there was

a failure to comply with that order. Doc. 10. To date, no response has been received

from the Plaintiff. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:09cv344-SPM/WCS

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, this complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

Plaintiff shall have a 15 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by filing a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on December 2, 2009.

 S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES

Within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation, a party may serve and

file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. A party may respond to another

party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits

the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED DATE AND TIME:

Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 10 a.m. meeting closed to the public. This meeting was rescheduled to Wednesday, December 7, 2005, at 2 p.m.

# DATE AND TIME:

Wednesday, December 7, 2005 at 2 p.m.

# PLACE:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.

Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g, § 438(b), and Title 26, U.S.C.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a particular employee.

# DATE AND TIME: 

Thursday, December 8, 2005, at 10 a.m.

# PLACE: 

999 E Street, NW., Washington, D.C. (Ninth Floor).

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be open to the public.

# ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Advisory Opinion 2005-19: Inside Track Productions by Mr. Emil Franzi.

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Coordinated Communications.

Routine Administrative Matters.

# PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: 

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 05-23577  Filed 11-29-05; 2:53 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
CERTIFICATION

     I, Allen Jones, certify that:

  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of USA
     Telcom Internationale;

  2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain
     any untrue statement of a material fact, or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
     of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
     not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     quarterly report; and

  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
     financial information included in this quarterly report,
     fairly present in all material respects the financial
     position, results of operations, and cash flows of the issuer
     as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
     report.

  4.The registrant's other certifying officers and I am
     responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
     controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
     14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
       that material information relating to the registrant, including its
       consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
       those entities, particularly during the period in which this
       quarterly report is being prepared;
     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
       controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
       filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
       effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
       our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

  5.The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
     disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
     registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
     board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
       internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's
       ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
       have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
       weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
       or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
       internal controls; and

  6.The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
     indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
     that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent
     to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
     corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
     material weaknesses.


Date:  March 18, 2004

/s/ Allen Jones
--------------------
     President
     Chief Executive Officer
     Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                              161,518
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                    18,973,112
<ALLOWANCES>                        610,909
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 22,404,686
<PP&E>                          137,447,369
<DEPRECIATION>                   63,888,390
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  130,987,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            12,522,193
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             66,734
<OTHER-SE>                       31,326,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    130,987,770
<SALES>                          29,010,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 29,010,315
<CGS>                            21,156,538
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    21,156,538
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  4,532,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  545,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   2,819,828
<INCOME-TAX>                      1,157,123
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               1,662,705
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      1,662,705
<EPS-BASIC>                          0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.28


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages F-3 and F-4 of the
Company's Form 10-KSB/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             271
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   271
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     446
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2,990)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       446
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,259
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,259)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
# C_2011040EN.01001902.xml

| 9.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/19

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions given at its meeting of 20 June 2008 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.180 — Aluminium fluoride (2)

Rapporteur: Austria

2011/C 40/11

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amount of the fines.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the proposed decision as regards immunity and the rejection of any reduction of the fines, based on the 2002 Leniency Notice. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the proposed decision as regards immunity and the rejection of any reduction of the fines, based on the 2002 Leniency Notice.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union.

---