alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 273

### CFR Correction

In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 266 to 299, revised as of July 1, 2006, in § 273.9, on page 463, in alphabetical order, reinstate the definition of “On-site” to read as follows:

§ 273.9

* * * * *

*On-site*                         means the same or geographically contiguous property which may be divided by public or private right-of-way, provided that the entrance and exit between the properties is at a cross-roads intersection, and access is by crossing as opposed to going along the right of way. Non-contiguous properties owned by the same person but connected by a right-of-way which he controls and to which the public does not have access, are also considered on-site property.                    

* * * * *

[FR Doc. 07-55505 Filed 6-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2264 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the impaneling of a 

new jury if a jury fails to recommend by unanimous vote a sentence 

for conviction of a crime punishable by death. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. COTTON, and Mr. 

CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the 

impaneling of a new jury if a jury fails to recommend 

by unanimous vote a sentence for conviction of a crime 

punishable by death. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Eric’s Law’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2264 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO IMPANEL A NEW JURY IN CER2 TAIN CASES. 

3 (a) ADDITIONAL GROUND FOR IMPANELING JURY.— 

4 Section 3593(b)(2) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

7 the end; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(E) a new special hearing is required pur10 suant to subsection (g); or’’. 

11 (b) IMPANELING OF NEW JURY WHEN JURY DOES

12 NOT REACH A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION.—Section 

13 3593 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by add14 ing at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(g) SPECIAL RULE WHEN JURY DOES NOT RE16 TURN A UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION.— 

17 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a jury described in sub18 section (b)(1) or subparagraphs (A) through (D) of 

19 subsection (b)(2) does not, by unanimous vote, make 

20 a recommendation whether the defendant should be 

21 sentenced to death, to life imprisonment without 

22 possibility of release, or some other lesser sentence 

23 pursuant to subsection (e), the court, upon motion 

24 of the attorney for the government, shall order a 

25 new special hearing and impanel a new jury pursu26 ant to subsection (b). 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2264 IS

1 ‘‘(2) IMPOSITION OF SENTENCE.—If the jury 

2 impaneled pursuant to paragraph (1) does not reach 

3 a unanimous recommendation as to sentence, the 

4 court shall impose a sentence other than death au5 thorized by law.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION  I, Ted R. Sharp, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  November 13, 2007  By:   /s/  Ted R. Sharp Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.     1
#### STATE v. BLOUNT

No. 25 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 750.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 March 1977.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CURTIS LEE LOVINGS

No. 9

(Filed 13 October 1971)

Appeal by defendant from *Copeland, S. J.,*November 1970 Session Onslow Superior Court.

In this criminal prosecution the defendant, Curtis Lee Lov-ings, was charged by grand jury indictment with the armed robbery of Dwight M. Craft. The offense is alleged to have occurred on November 9, 1969. Upon arraignment the defendant, represented by counsel, entered a plea of not guilty.

Dwight M. Craft, a witness for the State, testified that on November 9, 1969, he drove his automobile from Jacksonville, Florida, to Jacksonville, North Carolina. He stopped for gas near Wilmington at about 3 o’clock in the morning. The defendant, whom he did not know, requested and was given permission to ride as a passenger in the Craft vehicle to the North Carolina Naval Base at Jacksonville. Before reaching the latter point, the defendant drew a short, flat pistol, not a revolver, and by its threatened use forcibly took from the witness $20.00 in currency.

When Craft stopped the automobile at Jacksonville about 3:30 o’clock in the morning, the defendant ran. Craft notified the police who soon thereafter arrested the defendant in a telephone booth. He had a flat automatic pistol and $18.39 in his pocket. The witness positively identified the defendant as the person who robbed him, and so testified before the jury. The defendant neither testified nor offered evidence. The jury returned a verdict of guilty. The defendant appealed from the sentence imposed.

The court appointed counsel to prosecute the appeal. However, the case on appeal was not served within the time required by the appellate rules. Nevertheless, the Court of Appeals by *certiorari*ordered the appeal docketed for review. The cause was transferred to the Supreme Court as prescribed by its referral order of July 31, 1970. The defendant filed the following signed statement with his case on appeal :

“That I am entitled to my release from North Carolina custody on the grounds that I have been denied my consti*508tutional right of appeal from verdict and judgment and that an appeal by *Writ of Certiorari*at this late date still results in denial of fundamental constitutional rights because if I am successful on said appeal, a new trial eighteen (18) months later would be inherently unfair, etc.

/s/ Curtis Lee Lovings”

*Robert Morgan, Attorney General, by William W. Melvin, Assistant Attorney General; T. Buie Costen, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.*

*Worth B. Folger for defendant appellant.*

HIGGINS, Justice.

The defendant permitted the time to pass without perfecting his appeal. However, on petition the record was ordered filed in the Court of Appeals for review.

The case on appeal notes some minor objections to the introduction of testimony. Review, however, discloses the objections are not sustained. In fact, the record before us fails to disclose any error either in the trial or in the judgment.

No error.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs CASE NO: 3:01cr9LAC

LUIS MORALES,

Defendant.

__________________________________________________/

ORDER REDUCING SENTENCE

Defendant's sentence of confinement is hereby reduced from 150 months to 75

months. In all other respects, the original sentence imposed in the Judgment and

Commitment Order filed 28 March 2003 shall remain unchanged.

ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2007.

 s/L.A. Collier 

 LACEY A. COLLIER

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:01-cr-00009-LC Document 199 Filed 09/17/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of WindTamer Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I William A. Schmitz, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: May 12, 2011





/s/ William A. SchmitzWilliam A. SchmitzPresident and Chief Executive Officer





This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Sand, Stone, Gravel, & Aggregates


Skip Navigation


Version 08/29/2016wRTB


Safety and Health Toolbox Talks when and where you need them
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

###### NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

          - 48 CFR Part 52 

### CFR Correction

In Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter I (Parts 52 to 99), revised as of October 1, 2006, on page 80, in section 52.215-15, correct paragraph (b) and the source note to read as follows:

52.215-15

* * * * *

(b) For segment closings, pension plan terminations, or curtailment of benefits, the amount of the adjustment shall be—

                            (1) For contracts and subcontracts that are subject to full coverage under the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) Board rules and regulations (48 CFR Chapter 99), the amount                                   ( print page 55090)                                measured, assigned, and allocated in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.413-50(c)(12); and                        

(2) For contracts and subcontracts that are not subject to full coverage under the CAS, the amount measured, assigned, and allocated in accordance with 48 CFR 9904.413-50(c)(12), except the numerator of the fraction at 48 CFR 9904.413-50(c)(12)(vi) shall be the sum of the pension plan costs allocated to all non-CAS covered contracts and subcontracts that are subject to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 31.2 or for which cost or pricing data were submitted.

* * * * *
63 FR 5859868 FR 6925769 FR 5970469 FR 60967

[FR Doc. 07-55518 Filed 9-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### STATE v. HARRIS

No. 302 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 735.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 October 1981.
CPRIT Extension


 




EXHIBIT 10.1




PORTIONS HEREIN IDENTIFIED BY [*****] HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED  FROM THIS EXHIBIT BECAUSE THE EXCLUDED INFORMATION IS BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.




		
	Grant ID: DP160012

	PI/PD/CR: Jeff Hutchins


	No Cost Extension with Attachment F

	 











As indicated by the signatures below, the INSTITUTE and the RECIPIENT agree to the following amendments to the CPRIT Contract:




Original Contract End Date: 31 May 2019 

Current Contract End Date: 30 May 2020 

Proposed Contract End Date: 30 Nov 2020

Justification: [*****].




Contract Document F: Parties hereby agree that the RECIPIENT is granted a third six-month extension of time from the termination date reflected in the Attachment F-No Cost Extension (Version 2) approved on November 20, 2019, for purposes of concluding the approved scope of work as authorized by the Contract. Accordingly, the May 30, 2020 termination date is replaced with November 30, 2020. All terms and conditions of the Contract continue during the extension period. Parties agree that this extension is a “no-cost” extension and approval of this amendment does not approve, grant or confer additional grant funds in excess of the amount originally awarded.




Description: The May 30, 2020 termination date is replaced with November 30, 2020 for purposes of concluding the approved scope of work as authorized by the Contract.




		
	 
	 



	RECIPIENT

Pelican Therapeutics

ASO Name: Jasuja, Rahul

Submitted Date: 02 Apr 2020

	INSTITUTE

Cancer Prevention & Research Institute of Texas

CEO Name: Roberts, Wayne

Approved Date: 09 Apr 2020
Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 27 Filed 04/14/10 Page 1 of 6Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 27 Filed 04/14/10 Page 2 of 6Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 27 Filed 04/14/10 Page 3 of 6Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 27 Filed 04/14/10 Page 4 of 6Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 27 Filed 04/14/10 Page 5 of 6Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 27 Filed 04/14/10 Page 6 of 6
# C_2011093EN.01001601.xml

| 25.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/16

---

Information from Estonia concerning implementation of Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

2011/C 93/09

The Republic of Estonia has informed the Commission according to Annex II, Section II.2.8 to Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on the inland transport of dangerous goods that:

| — | in accordance to the requirements set out in Annex II, Section II.2.8 to Directive 2008/68/EC Estonia uses Annex II to SMGS regarding the transport of dangerous goods by rail from and to contracting parties of the OSJD which are not Member States of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

in accordance to the requirements set out in Annex II, Section II.2.8 to Directive 2008/68/EC Estonia uses Annex II to SMGS regarding the transport of dangerous goods by rail from and to contracting parties of the OSJD which are not Member States of the European Union.

---
**Exhibit 23.2**
Explanation Concerning Absence of Current Written Consent of Arthur AndersenLLP
On March 12, 2002, Riggs National Corporation (the “Company”) announced that ithad appointed KPMG LLP to replace Arthur Andersen LLP (“Arthur Andersen”) asits independent public accountants. Representatives of Arthur Andersen are notavailable to provide an updated written consent required for the incorporationby reference of its audit report with respect to the Company’s financialstatements as of, and for the yearsended, December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 included in this Annual Reporton Form 10-K into registration statements filed by the Company and currentlyeffective under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”).Because, after reasonable effort, the Company is unable to obtain ArthurAndersen’s written consent to such incorporation by reference of their report,Rule 437a under the Act permits the Company to omit ArthurAndersen’s updated written consent from this filing.
Section 11(a) of the Securities Act provides that if any part of a registrationstatement at the time it becomes effective contains an untrue statement of amaterial fact or an omission to state a material factrequired to be stated there in or necessary to make the statements therein notmisleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registrationstatement (unless it is proved that at the time of suchacquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may sue, amongothers, every accountant who has consented to be named as having prepared orcertified any part of the registration statement or as having preparedor certified any report or valuation which is used in connection with theregistration statement with respect to the statement in such registrationstatement, report or valuation which purports to have been prepared orcertified by the accountant.
While Arthur Andersen did consent to the incorporation by reference of itsaudit report with respect to the Company’s financial statements as of, and forthe years ended, December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000 contained in itsAnnual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2001, as noted above, Arthur Andersen hasnot consented to the incorporation by reference of such audit report containedin this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a result, with respect to an applicableregistration statement, the Company’s investors may not be able to recoveragainst Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Act or the lack of acurrently dated consent may limit the time inwhich any liability under Section 11(a) could be asserted against ArthurAndersen.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”), that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: May 16, 2011





By: /s/Samuel R. Newborn


Samuel R. Newborn


principle executive officer














Date: May 16, 2011








By: /s/Bruce R. Foster


Bruce R. Foster


Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.