# EUR-Lex - 52012DC0311 - EN

*|*

# 52012DC0311

**Recommendation for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION on Estonia’s 2012 national reform programme and delivering a Council Opinion on Estonia’s stability programme for 2012-2015 /* COM/2012/0311 final */**

			*

			*

Recommendation for a

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

on Estonia’s 2012 national reform
programme
and delivering a Council Opinion on Estonia’s stability programme
for 2012-2015

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 121(2) and 148(4)
thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No
1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary
positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies[1], and in particular Article 5(2)
thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation of the
European Commission[2],

Having regard to the conclusions of the
European Council,

Having regard to the resolutions of the
European Parliament,[3]

Having regard to the opinion of the
Employment Committee,

After consulting the Economic and Financial
Committee,

Whereas:

(1)       On 26 March 2010, the
European Council agreed to the European Commission’s proposal to launch a new
strategy for jobs and growth, Europe 2020, based on enhanced coordination of
economic policies, which will focus on the key areas where action is needed to
boost Europe’s potential for sustainable growth and competitiveness.

(2)       On 13 July 2010, the
Council adopted a recommendation on the broad guidelines for the economic
policies of the Member States and the Union (2010 to 2014) and, on 21 October
2010, adopted a decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the
Member States[4],
which together form the ‘integrated guidelines’. Member States were invited to
take the integrated guidelines into account in their national economic and
employment policies.

(3)       On 12 July 2011, the
Council adopted a recommendation on Estonia’s national reform programme for 2011
and delivered its opinion on Estonia’s updated stability programme for
2011-2014.

(4)       On 23 November 2011, the
Commission adopted the second Annual Growth Survey, marking the start of the second
European semester of ex-ante and integrated policy coordination, which is
anchored in the Europe 2020 strategy. On 14 February 2012, the Commission, on
the basis of Regulation (EU) 1176/2011, adopted the Alert Mechanism Report[5], in which it did not identify
Estonia as one of the Member States for which an in-depth review would be
carried out.

(5)       On 2 March 2012, the
European Council endorsed the priorities for ensuring financial stability,
fiscal consolidation and action to foster growth. It underscored the need to pursue
differentiated, growth-friendly fiscal consolidation, to restore normal lending
conditions to the economy, to promote growth and competitiveness, to tackle
unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis, and to modernise public
administration. It invited Member States to implement the Council’s country-specific
recommendations for 2011 and to translate these priorities into concrete
measures to be included in their stability or convergence programmes and national
reform programmes.

(6)       On
2 March 2012, the European Council also invited the Member States participating
in the Euro Plus Pact to present their commitments in time for inclusion in
their stability or convergence programmes and their national reform programmes.

(7)       On 26 April 2012, Estonia
submitted its stability programme covering the period 2012-2015 and its 2012 national
reform programme. In order to take account of their interlinkages, the two
programmes have been assessed at the same time.

(8)       Based on the assessment of
the stability programme pursuant to Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No
1466/97, the Council is of the opinion that the macroeconomic scenario
underpinning the budgetary projections in the programme is plausible in 2012-13,
when GDP growth is expected to average around 2.4%. The Commission's 2012 spring
forecast foresees GDP growth of 3.8% in 2013. The objective of the budgetary
strategy outlined in the programme is to ensure sustainable fiscal policy that
supports balanced growth, by achieving a structural surplus while ensuring
sufficient fiscal buffers and reducing the tax burden on labour. The strategy
also aims at fulfilling the requirements of the Stability and Growth Pact. The
programme aims at overachieving the medium-term budgetary objective (MTO) of a
structural surplus as of 2012. The MTO adequately reflects the requirements of
the Stability and Growth Pact. Based on the (recalculated) structural budget
balance,[6],
the rate of growth of government expenditure, taking into account discretionary
revenue measures, complies with the expenditure benchmark of the Stability and
Growth Pact in all years except 2013 (when the MTO is planned to be reached)
and 2014. In parallel, the programme aims at reaching headline surpluses as of
2014. The debt ratio is well below 60% of GDP and, according to the programme,
is likely to decrease after 2013 to about 10% in 2015.

(9)       Estonia achieved a
sizeable budget surplus in 2011. The projected rate of economic growth for 2012
in the Commission's 2012 spring forecast looks much weaker than for 2011,
dropping from 7.6% to 1.6 %, and therefore further control over efficiency of
spending is necessary. Estonia plans to introduce a structural budget rule in
2012 to help keep control over expenditure. The rule should be complemented by
strengthening the binding nature of the multi-annual expenditure targets as
soon as the budget rule is in place. Thus, Estonia has partially implemented the
2011 recommendation in this area.

(10)     As regards the labour
market, a number of steps have been made in the area of labour taxation.
However, the incentives to work can be improved by addressing the rising trend
in take up of disability and incapacity-for-work benefits and by making work
pay for low and high-income earners receiving unemployment and parental
benefits. While promising efforts are made to reduce the high unemployment, long-term
and youth unemployment is still high. As a result, the poverty risk of children
in jobless households is increasing and needs to be addressed by effective
social services, including family services. The family support itself could be
made more efficient in a budget-neutral way by better targeting the allocation
of parental and family benefits and by removing inefficient income tax
exemptions related to children.

(11)     The measures in the
National Energy Efficiency Action Plan are still insufficient given the current
trend of modal shift away from public transport. The fleet of new cars in
Estonia is the most energy intensive in EU. Fuel excise duties are insufficient
in shifting consumer patterns. The transposition of several energy-related EU
Directives has not yet been fully completed. Estonia still needs to diversify its
energy supply. The electricity infrastructure could be upgraded to integrate
increasing amounts of wind energy.

(12)     The quality and
availability of vocational education has considerably improved and more
modernisation measures are planned for 2012-13. However, the transition from
general education to vocational education (VET) needs to be improved, and a
generalisation of more work-based schemes could be considered. Lifelong
learning participation is improving, but there is an insufficient focus on
low-skilled workers. There are continuing problems with matching education
outcomes with labour market needs. There is also a need to urgently reform
upper-secondary education and for further improvement in the provision of
education services by local authorities. Also, cooperation between the business
sector and higher education institutions continues to be weak, while the
knowledge-intensive part of the private sector should be further developed.

(13)     To reflect the declining
demographic trend and ensure a balanced and competitive regional development there
is a longer-term need to ensure financial sustainability of local governments as
well as to ensure a better provision of public services at local level and
optimise the use of relatively dispersed resources. Being limited in size, the
majority of local governments have difficulties to universally deliver the
necessary social, health, labour market, transport and educational services.

(14)     Estonia has made a number
of commitments under the Euro Plus Pact. These commitments, and the
implementation of the commitments presented in 2011, relate to fostering
employment, improving competitiveness and enhancing sustainability of public
finances. The Commission has assessed the implementation of the Euro Plus Pact
commitments. The results of this assessment have been taken into account in the
recommendations.

(15)     In the context of the
European Semester, the Commission has carried out a comprehensive analysis of Estonia’s
economic policy. It has assessed the stability programme and national reform
programme. It has taken into account not only their relevance for sustainable
fiscal and socio-economic policy in Estonia but also their compliance with EU
rules and guidance, given the need to reinforce the overall economic governance
of the European Union by providing EU-level input into future national
decisions. Its recommendations under the European Semester are
reflected in recommendations (1) to (5) below.

(16)     In the light of this
assessment, the Council has examined Estonia’s stability programme, and its
opinion[7]
is reflected in particular in recommendation (1) below,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that Estonia should
take action within the period 2012-2013 to:

1.           Preserve a sound fiscal position by implementing budgetary
plans as envisaged, ensuring achievement of the medium-term budgetary objective
(MTO) by 2013 at the latest, and compliance with the expenditure benchmark.
Complement the planned budget rule with more binding multi-annual expenditure
rules within the medium-term budgetary framework, continue enhancing the
efficiency of public spending and step up the fight against the shadow economy.

2.           Improve incentives to work
by streamlining the social benefits system and increasing flexibility in the
allocation of disability, unemployment and parental benefits, while ensuring
adequate social protection. Improve delivery of social services, while better targeting
family and parental benefits and removing distortionary income tax exemptions
related to children. Increase the participation of the young and the long-term
unemployed in the labour market.

3.           Link training and
education more effectively to the needs of the labour market, and enhance
cooperation between businesses and academia. Increase opportunities for low
skilled workers to improve their access to life-long learning. Foster
prioritisation and internationalisation of the research and innovation systems.

4.           Improve energy efficiency,
in particular in buildings and transport, and strengthen environmental incentives
concerning vehicles and waste, including by considering
incentives such as the taxation of vehicles. Foster
renewable energy use, including through upgraded infrastructure and legislation.
Continue the development of cross-border connections to end relative market
isolation.

5.           Enhance fiscal
sustainability of municipalities while improving efficiency of local governments
and ensure effective service provision, notably through stronger incentives for
merger or increased cooperation of municipalities. Relevant reform proposals
should be put in place within a reasonable timeframe.

Done at Brussels,

For
the Council

The
President

[1]               OJ L 209, 02.08.1997, p. 1

[2]               COM(2012)311 final

[3]               P7_TA(2012)0048 and P7_TA(2012)0047

[4]               Council Decision 2012/238/EU of 26 April 2012

[5]               COM(2012) 68 final

[6]               Cyclically adjusted balance net of one-off and
temporary measures, recalculated by the Commission services on the basis of the information provided in the programme, using
the commonly agreed methodology.

[7]               Under Article 5(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No
1466/97