alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey R. Mason, Chief Financial Officer of Rockwell
Diamonds Inc. (formerly, "Rockwell Ventures Inc.") (the Company), hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F
(Amendment #2) of the Company for the fiscal year ended 31 May 2006 (the Annual
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Date:  | May 12, 2007           
|------ | -----------------------
|       | /s/ Jeffrey R. Mason   
|By:    | Jeffrey R. Mason       
|Title: | Chief Financial Officer

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
20-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
"Exchange Act"). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
Exhibit 99.2



CERTIFICATION





I, Ellamae Anderson, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report if being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and



(c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



1.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

1.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



/s/ Ellamae Anderson



DATE:  November 12, 2002

Ellamae Anderson, Corp. Secretary
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RED MOUNTAIN BANK, N.A.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-104/RS/EMT

TOP SHELF STORAGE II, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Suggestion of Bankruptcy (Doc. 19). This action is stayed

as to Defendant Top Shelf Storage II only. The Show Cause Hearing presently 

scheduled for July 8, 2010, is cancelled.

ORDERED on July 7, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT
15.5
 
 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPHays Galleria1 Hays LaneLondon SE 1 2RDTelephone +44 (0) 20 7583 5000Facsimile +44 (0) 20 7804 1001Report of Independent Accountants
    
    www.pwc.com/uk
  2.1 d(iii),




---



##### 



Appendix A
 The Directors
    
    Gracechurch Card Notes 2006-A PLCBarclays Bank PLC
    
    54 Lombard StreetBarclaycard
    
    London1234 Pavilion Drive
    
    EC3P 3AHNorthamptonNN4 7SGThe Directors
    
    The DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 3) PLC
    
    Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 8) PLC54 Lombard Street
    
    54 Lombard StreetLondon
    
    LondonEC3P 3AH
    
    EC3P 3AHThe Directors
    
    The DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 9) PLC
    
    Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 10) PLC54 Lombard Street
    
    54 Lombard StreetLondon
    
    LondonEC3P 3AH
    
    EC3P 3AHThe Directors
    
    The DirectorsGracechurch Card Funding (No. 11) PLC
    
    Barclaycard Funding PLC54 Lombard Street
    
    54 Lombard StreetLondon
    
    LondonEC3P 3AH
    
    EC3P 3AHThe DirectorsGracechurch Receivables Trustee Limited26 New StreetSt. HelierJerseyJE2 3RA
 (2)




---



##### 



Appendix B
 Managements Assertion Concerning Compliance
with requirements set forth in the Beneficiaries Servicing Agreement between
 Barclaycard Funding PLC and Barclays Bank PLC dated 23 November 1999 (BSA).
 14 July 2008
     Timothy George Jung
Financial Controller/s/ Timothy George Jung End of Filing
 -35-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000059584
<NAME> ALIANT COMMUNICATIONS CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           18408
<SECURITIES>                                      5800
<RECEIVABLES>                                    31647
<ALLOWANCES>                                       408
<INVENTORY>                                       6629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 67000
<PP&E>                                          512613
<DEPRECIATION>                                  298611
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  295982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            56352
<BONDS>                                          44000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       4499
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      136149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    295982
<SALES>                                           4746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                154194
<CGS>                                             2506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   103804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2854
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   248
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  47536
<INCOME-TAX>                                     18162
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              29374
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     29205 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                29205.000   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                29205.000
        

</TABLE>
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS P D-0811-08 GLEN N R

YD EL ARM STRON G , Appe lla nt

v . THE S TATE O FTEXAS ONAP P ELLANT ’S P ETIT IONF OR DI SCRETIO NARYRE VI EW F RO MTHE F IF TH C OU RT OFAP P EALS

DALLA S CO UN TY P ercur iam . O P I N I O N A p p e llan t w a s c o n v icte d in 1 9 9 3 o f a g g ra v a ted a ss a u lt an d se n ten c e d to 9 9 y e a rs. H is c o n v ic tio n w a s a f

f irm e d o n a p p e a l. A rm str o n gv . S ta te , N o. 05- 92- 01851- C R s l i p op. ( T ex. Ap p . – Da l l a s No v . 2 6 , 1 9 9 6 ) . I n 2 0 0 6 , a p p e l l a n tf i l e d a p o s t - c o n v i c t i o n mo t i o n f o rDNA t es t i ng. T he tr i al cour tdeni ed the mot i on. T h e c o u rt o f a p p e a ls u p h e ld th e d e n ia l o f th e m o tio n . A rm str o n g v . S ta te , N o. 05- 07- 0 0 1 1 7 -C R slip o p . (T e x . A p p .– D a llas D e c . 1 1 , 2 0 0 7 ). T h e c o u rt h e ld th a t alth o u g h id e n tity w as an i s s u e i n t h e c a s e , e x c u l p a t o r yDN A r e s u l t s e x c l u d i n g a p p e l l a n twou l d n o th a veG L E N N R Y D E L A R M ST R O N G – 2

r es ul t ed i n a di ffe r entout come becaus e there w as suffi ci entot hercompet entevi dence c o n n e c tin g a p p e lla n t to th e c ri m e . I d. a t 8 -9 . A ppel l anthas fi l ed a pe t i t i on fordi s cr et i onaryr evi ew , cont endi ng i n p art tha t the c o u r to f a p p e a l s ’ h o l d i n g t h a tt h e l o n e a t t a c k e r ’ s i d e n t i t yi s i n i s s u e , y e te x c u l p a t o r yDNA re su lts w o u ld n o t es tab lish in n o c e n c e , is ill o g ica l a n d c o n tra d icto ry , an d is a t o d d s w ith th is C our t ’ s opi ni on i n B la c k lo c k v . S ta te , 2 3 5 S . W . 3 d 2 3 1 (T ex . C ri m . A p p . 2 0 0 7 ). T hi s C our tr ece nt l yhanded dow n Esp a rz a v . S ta te , PD - 1616- 07 s l i p op. at17 ( T ex. C r i m . A pp. M ay13, 2009) , i n w hi ch w e hel d t hatt he courtof appeal s ’ deci s i on t o uphol d t he t r i al court’s d en i al of the pos t - convi ct i on D N A m ot i on beca us e “ther e [w as ] s uffi ci ent evi dence , bes i des D N A evi dence , t o es t abl i s h gui l t . . . confl i ct s w i t h ourunani m ous opi ni on i n B l acklock . ” W e furt herhel d t hatnon- D N A evi dence co n n ec ti ng t he appe l l antt o t he cr i m e, s uch as ey e- w i t nes s i dent i fi cat i on, “i s of no cons equenc e i n cons i der i ng w hether[the a p p e llan t] h a s e sta b lish e d th a t, by a p re p o n d e ra n c e o f th e e v id e n c e , ex c u lp a to ryD N A tes ts w oul d pr ove hi s i nnocenc e. ” I d. at18. T h e co u rt o f appeal s di d nothave the bene fi tof ouropi ni on i n Esparza . W e s um m ar i l ygr antappel l ant ’ s pet i t i on fordi s cr et i onaryr evi ew , vaca t e the judgm entof the cour tof appe al s , and r emand t hi s cas e t o t hatcour tt o r econs i deri n l i ghtof Esparza . D E L I V E R E D : J U N E 24, 2009 DO NOT P UB L I S H
#### ATTAWAY v. SNIPES

No. 142 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 619.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 February 1980.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATEBARCLAYS BANK PLCGRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 9) PLC     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Barclays Bank PLC (the “Bank”), asServicer, pursuant to the Beneficiaries Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 23, 1999 (the“Agreement”), among the Bank, as Servicer and Barclaycard Funding PLC, as Investor Beneficiary,does hereby certify that:     1. The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings asset forth in the Agreement.     2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.     3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2006 was conducted under my supervision.     4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreementthroughout such calendar year and no material default in the performance ofsuch obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in theParagraph 5 below.     5. The following is a description of each material default in the performanceof the Servicer’s obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known tothe undersigned to have been made by the Servicer during the calendar yearended December 31, 2005, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each suchdefault, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each suchdefault and (iii) the current status of each such default:     None.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Annual Servicer’s Certificate this27th day of June, 2006.      Barclays Bank PLC
#### STATE v. COLLINS

No. 48.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 141.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question denied 8 January 1980.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel Fellowship Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 30, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Mandarin Oriental Hotel, 1330 Maryland Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20024.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Joann McConnell, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, NIH/NINDS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd.,  Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, (301) 496-5324,                         *mcconnej@ninds.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 12, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5201  Filed 10-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
indicated  below of  Brookdale  Living  Communities,  Inc.  of our report on the
consolidated financial statements indicated below.

Registration Statements
-----------------------

Form S-8 No. 333-51493
Form S-3 No. 333-53969
Form S-3 No. 333-65843
Form S-8 No. 333-86013

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                  Financial Statements                                            Date of Auditor's Report
                  --------------------                                            ------------------------

      <S>                                                                            <C>
      Consolidated Financial Statements of Brookdale Living                          February 24, 2000,
      Communities, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and                         except for Note 17 as
      for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for the                     to which the date is
      period from May 7, 1997 through December 31, 1997 and the                      March 13, 2000.
      combined statements of operations, changes in partners'
      capital (deficit) and cash flows of Predecessor Properties
      for the period from January 1, 1997 through May 6, 1997
      included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Brookdale
      Living Communities, Inc. for the year ended December
      31, 1999 dated March 30, 2000.

                                                                                    /s/Ernst & Young LLP
</TABLE>




Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 2000
#### WILKO CORPORATION and CAVALIER INSURANCE CORPORATION v. S. C. HARRISON and MRS. S. C. HARRISON. and IVAN FOSTER v. S. C. HARRISON and MRS. S. C. HARRISON.

(Filed 11 April, 1962.)

Appeals by plaintiffs from *Crissman, J.,*January 1962 Term, Wilkes Superior Court.

These cases grew out of a collision between a tractor-trailer unit owned by The Wilko Corporation and driven by Ivan Foster, and a Chevrolet pickup truck owned by S. C. Harrison and driven by his wife, Mrs. S. C. Harrison. The accident occurred about noon on Highway No. 601, near Yadkinville. Both drivers were proceeding south on a straight highway approximately 20 feet wide. The weather was fair and the road was dry and free of traffic.

As Mrs. Harrison attempted to pass the tractor-trailer the right side of the pickup and the left side of the tractor-trailer came in contact near the center of the highway. The pickup was slightly damaged. The tractor-trailer ran over an embankment and was almost totally destroyed. Both drivers received some injuries. Each claimed to have been on the proper side of the road. Each claimed the other had crossed to the improper side and had caused the accident.

The corporate plaintiff claimed damages to its equipment and cargo in the sum of $16,600. The individual plaintiff claimed damages of $50,000 as the result of his personal injuries. The defendants set up counterclaim of $100 damage to the vehicle and $1,000 for Mrs. Harrison’s injuries. The court submitted proper issues, all of which were answered in favor of the defendants. The jury awarded Mr. Harrison *709$100 for damages to the pickup, and Mrs. Harrison $400 for her injuries. From judgments in accordance with the verdict, the plaintiffs appealed.

*Larry S. Moore, McElwee & Hall, By John E. Hall, for plaintiffs, appellants.*

*Julius A. Rousseau, Jr., Hudson, Ferrell, Petree, Stockton, Stockton & Robinson, By R. M. Stockton, Jr., for defendants, appellees.*

Per Curiam.

The only eyewitnesses to the accident were the two drivers. Their testimony was conflicting. The court reviewed the evidence, explained the law arising thereon, and gave proper instructions as to the burden of proof on each of the issues. Nothing in the record indicates the jury could have been confused or misled. The case involved a simple question: Which driver crossed over into the other’s traffic lane, thus causing the collision? The jury resolved the conflict in favor of the defendants. In the record, we find

No error.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-20602

Conference Calendar

 

RICKIE LYNN GRAVES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GEORGE ARANDA,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-94-CV-2975

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1997

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rickie Lynn Graves, # 645074, appeals the dismissal of his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. He has filed a motion

for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. The

motion for leave to appeal IFP is GRANTED. 

A partial filing fee of $2.14 is required. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b)(1). The agency having custody of Graves is directed to

forward payment of the partial filing fee from his prisoner
No. 96-20602

- 2 -

account to the clerk of the district court. Graves shall also

make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s

income credited to his account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The

agency having custody of Graves is directed to forward payments

from his prisoner account to the clerk of the district court each

time the amount in his account exceeds $10 until the filing fee

of $105 is paid. See id.

Graves argues that the indigent mail policies of TDCJ-ID

limiting the hours of access to indigent postage and allowing

recoupment of funds from inmate accounts are unconstitutional

limits on inmates’ access to courts. These policies have been

previously approved. See Guajardo v. Estelle, 568 F. Supp. 1354,

1363 (S.D. Tex. 1983) and Guajardo v. Estelle, 580 F.2d 748,

762-63 (5th Cir. 1978).

Graves’ appeal is without arguable merit and, thus,

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See

5th Cir. R. 42.2. Graves is cautioned that any future frivolous

appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition

of sanctions. Graves is cautioned further to review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are

frivolous.

IFP GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 6, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00755-CV

LAUREN L. ROTTET, Appellant

V.

MATTHEW ARNOLD, Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-12932

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from a judgment signed September 18, 2023. The clerk’s 

record was filed November 14, 2023. The reporter’s record was filed January 2, 

2024. No brief was filed.

On June 20, 2024, we issued an order stating that unless appellant filed a brief 

on or before July 22, 2024, the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice

for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

Appellant filed no brief or other response. We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.