alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1380

In re: ANTHONY FORD,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted: May 23, 2013 Decided: May 28, 2013

Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Ford, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Ford petitions this court for a writ of 

mandamus seeking to compel the Commissioner of the Social 

Security Administration* to perform her official duties related 

to payment of Ford’s benefits, which were suspended during his 

pretrial detention. We deny the petition. 

The All Writs Act vests all statutorily created 

courts, including this court, with authority to issue “all writs 

necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective 

jurisdictions.” 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). In this case, 

however, the district court for the District of Maryland has 

original jurisdiction over Ford’s petition, and is therefore the 

proper venue for adjudication of the petition. See 28 U.S.C. 

§§ 1361, 1391 (2006). Nonetheless, we conclude that the 

interest of justice does not require us to transfer the petition 

to the District of Maryland. See Sorcia v. Holder, 643 F.3d 

117, 122 (4th Cir.) (holding “that where we ha[ve] jurisdiction 

but lack venue, we have inherent authority to transfer a case to 

another [court] where both venue and jurisdiction exist” and 

“that in the exercise of such inherent authority it is 

appropriate . . . to consider whether the interest of justice 

 * The Acting Commissioner is Carolyn Colvin.
3

mandates transfer”) (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. 

denied, 132 S. Ct. 776 (2011).

Accordingly, we grant Ford’s motion to proceed in 

forma pauperis, deny his motions for release of funds to retain 

private counsel, to appoint counsel, to expedite the hearing and 

verdict, and for relief from judgment, and we deny the mandamus 

petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.02






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of MineralRite Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Guy Peckham, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






/s/ Guy Peckham


By: Guy Peckham


Its: Chief Financial Officer





Dated: April 16, 2013





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### STATE v. COVINGTON

No. 139 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 771.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 July 1979. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 12 July 1979.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1 COMPANYS OFFICERS CERTIFICATE GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 5) PLC
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE The undersigned officer of Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 5) PLC, a public
limited company incorporated in England and Wales (the Issuer), hereby
certifies on behalf of the Issuer and on his own behalf for purposes of the
$600,000,000 Class A1 Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, the $300,000,000 Class
A2 Fixed Rate Asset-Backed Notes, the $50,000,000 Class B Floating Rate
Asset-Backed Notes and the $50,000,000 Class C Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes
(together, the Notes), as follows:  1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the Issuer;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the Issuer; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of Notes for the period between January 1, 2003 and the end of
the Issuers fiscal year on December 31, 2003. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned
to such terms in the Registration Statement related to the above-referenced
issue of Notes. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name this 21st day of June, 2004. By:
    
    /s/ Richard Francis SommersName: Richard Francis SommersTitle: Director
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 1 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 2 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 3 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 4 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 5 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 6 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 7 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 8 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 9 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 10 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 11 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 12 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 13 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 14 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 15 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 16 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 17 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 18 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 19 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 20 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 21 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 22 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 23 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 24 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 25 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 26 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 27 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 28 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 29 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 30 of 31
Case 3:09-cv-00571-RS-MD Document 136 Filed 09/17/10 Page 31 of 31
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                              14
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (340)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,863
<PP&E>                                           6,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,036)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,561
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           413
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,575)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,663
<SALES>                                          4,035
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,445
<CGS>                                            1,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 264
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (22)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (22)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (22)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,






AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






I, Khris Thetsy, certify that:






1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Explore Anywhere Holding Corp.






2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;






3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;






4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:




a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;









b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and









c)
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;




5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and









b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and




6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.






Date: July 1, 2011






By: /s/ Kris Thetsy






Name: Kris Thetsy Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUULE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, NW.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

John Ley

Clerk of Court

February 24, 2011

MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL OR PARTIES

Appeal Number: 1 1-10476-H

Case Style: In re: Robert Smith, Jr.

District Court Docket No: 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT

The enclosed order has been entered.

Sincerely,

JOHN LEY, Clerk of Court

Reply to: Walter Pollard, H

Phone #: (404) 335-6186

For rules and forms visit

I U UcUrts6v

MP- 1

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV -EMT Document 159 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUI

No. 11-10476-H

In re: ROBERT P. SMITH, JR.,

Petitioner.

FILED

US. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTh CIRCUIT

2O41

JOHN LEY

CLEI(

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Florida

BEFORE: BLACK and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Before the Court is "Appellant's Emergency Motion for an Order

Implementing. . . ," which is construed as a petition for writ of mandamus.

On February 2,2011, the district court directed the district court clerk to

return, unfiled, Petitioner's notice of appeal and appellate filing fee. Petitioner

seeks to have this Court direct Respondents to enter his notice of appeal on the

docket and transmit the notice to this Court.

A district court has a ministerial duty to forward to the proper court of

appeals any notice of appeal that is filed. Fed.R.App.P. 3(d); Dickerson v.

McClellan, 37 F.3d 25 1, 252 (6th Cir. 1994). District courts cannot dismiss an

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV -EMT Document 159 Filed 02/24/11 Page 2 of 3
appeal based on a perceived defect.' Si Sperow v. Melvin, 153 F.3d 780, 781

(7th Cir. 1998); Dickerson, 37 F.3d at 252; Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 200 n.2

(4th Cir. 1983); Hogg v. United States, 411 F.2d 578, 580 (6th Cir. 1969); Liles v.

South Carolina Dep't of Corr., 414 F.2d 612, 614 (4th Cir. 1969).

In light of these well-established principles, Respondents, including the

District Judge, are directed to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus

within 14 days of the date of this order. Fed. R. App. P. 2 1(b).

After a notice of appeal is transmitted, this Court addresses any issues regarding, inter alia,

appellate jurisdiction, standing, andlor the merits.

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV -EMT Document 159 Filed 02/24/11 Page 3 of 3
EX-10.21





 Exhibit 10.21 

CERTAIN IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THE EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS BOTH NOT MATERIAL AND WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE REGISTRANT
IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED. [***] INDICATES THAT INFORMATION HAS BEEN REDACTED. 
  
 



 
  

					
	 9101 Wall Street Suite 1300
 Austin,
TX 78754
  
 Phone: 512 334 8900

Fax: 512 873 8806
 Prepared by:
	  		  	various-20201
	  	DATE	  	
	  	QUOTE #	  	
	  	CUSTOMER ID	  	
	  	VALID UNTIL	  	

 CUSTOMER2 

[***] 
  

									
	DESCRIPTION3	  	 	TAXED	 	 	 	AMOUNT	 
	[***]	  				 			
		  				 			
		  				 			
		  				 			
		  				 			
		  				 			
		  	  
	  
	 	 	  
	  
	 
	 TERMS AND CONDITIONS
 1. 50%
payment due (date)
 2. 50% payment due (date) / Pick Up
  

Customer Acceptance (sign below):
 Print
Name:                                Signature:       
                             Date:

 
 STI approval:

Print
Name:                                Signature:       
                             Date:
	  	 	Subtotal	 	 			
	  	 	Taxable	 	 	 	—  	 
	  	 	Tax Rate	 	 	 	0.000	% 
	  	 	Tax due	 	 	 	—  	 
	  	 	Other	 	 	 	  	 
	  	  
	  
	 	 	  
	  
	 
	  	 	TOTAL	4 	 	$	—  	 
	  				 			

 If you have any questions about this price quote, please contact 

512 334 8870 
 Thank You For Your
Business! 
  

	1.	 This form of sales invoice was used to document various equipment sales that occurred between February 4, 2020
and March 10, 2020. The closing date of the last transaction was March 31, 2020. 



	2.	 The various customers are manufacturers whose processes require deposition equipment. 



	3.	 Various manufacturing and process equipment were sold. 



	4.	 The aggregate purchase price of the sales was approximately $1.2 million.
#### LETCHWORTH v. TOWN OF AYDEN

No. 157 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 1.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 February 1980.
Exhibit
23.1




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. 333-158819, Form S-8 No. 333-150872, Form S-8 No. 333-129406, Form
S-8 No. 333-135101 and Form S-8 No. 333-148848) pertaining to the Web.com
Group, Inc. 2009 Inducement Award, 2008 Equity Incentive Plan, 1999 Equity
Incentive Plan, Miscellaneous Stock Option Agreements, 2005 Equity Incentive
Plan, 2005 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan,  2005 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, Interland-Georgia 1999 Stock Plan, Interland 1995 Stock
Option Plan, Interland 2001 Equity Incentive Plan, Interland 2002 Equity
Incentive Plan,  Interland 2005 Equity Incentive Plan , and Web.com
2006 Equity Incentive Plan of Web.com Group, Inc. of our reports dated March 5,
2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Web.com Group,
Inc., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of
Web.com Group, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2009.




/s/
      Ernst & Young LLPJacksonville,
      FloridaMarch
      5, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

DONALD DIXON
vs CASE NO. 5:10-CV-56 RS

WALTER MCNEIL
FINANCIAL REFERRAL AND ORDER

Regarding release of funds for:__ Fine, __ Restitution, X__ Filing Fee, ___ Attorney Admission Fee,
___ Copy Fee,__ Bond, ___ Other (Specify)

By: Donald Dixon #038320 (Payee)
Address: DOC, Inmate Bank

PO Box 13600

Centerville Station

Tallahassee, FL 32317-3600

Receipt Number_5-4289 & 5-4298 Date of Receipt __5/10/10 & 5/11/10

Motion: N/A

Explanation: On 5/10/10, the Clerk’s Office received $5.00 (see Docket Entry 7) for he habeas filing fee
for Petitioner, Donald Dixon. On 5/11/10, the Clerk’s Office received another $5.00 payment (see
Docket Entry 8) from the Department of Corrections (DOC). Requesting authorization to refund the
second payment of $5.00 to Petitioner’s DOC account.

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, Clerk of Court

Prepared by: __s/Philip Detweiler.

Philip Detweiler, Financial Specialist _. Date: June 1, 2010
ORDER OF COURT
Itis ORDERED this _/ day of NE 2010, that the Clerk refund the

identified funds to the payee.

vm — Lib LO,
DENIED cok
RICHARD SMOAK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Adopted: 12/03/99

Rec'd + 4? {OUsDeF nan 4 150
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - 10 CFR Part 171

### CFR Correction

In Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 51 to 199, revised as of January 1, 2007, in § 171.16, on page 742, paragraph (e) is reinstated to read as follows:

§ 171.16

* * * * *

(e) The activities comprising the surcharge are as follows:

(1) LLW disposal generic activities;

(2) Activities not directly attributable to an existing NRC licensee or class(es) of licenses (e.g., international cooperative safety program and international safeguards activities; support for the Agreement State program; decommissioning activities for unlicensed sites; and activities for unregistered general licensees); and

                        (3) Activities not currently assessed licensing and inspection fees under 10 CFR part 170 based on existing law or Commission policy (e.g., reviews and inspections of nonprofit educational institutions and reviews for Federal agencies; activities related to decommissioning and reclamation; and costs that would not be collected from small entities based on Commission policy in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601*et seq.*).                    

[FR Doc. 07-55509 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LAURIE PEEL,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv96/RS-AK

THE BANK OF BONIFAY,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Response To Order To Show Cause (Doc. 5).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is stayed until February 5, 2011, or until notice from the Receiver

of disallowal of Plaintiff’s proof of claim, whichever occurs first.

2. Plaintiff shall complete service of the complaint upon the Receiver not later

than thirty days after the termination of the stay.

ORDERED on September 7, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            2,597
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    19,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                      87,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                115,623
<PP&E>                                           34,013
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  206,198
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           227,284
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            301
<OTHER-SE>                                     (360,244)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    206,198
<SALES>                                         128,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                128,389
<CGS>                                            71,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    71,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4,709
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (9,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (9,488)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (9,488)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (9,488)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0


</TABLE>