alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DANIEL DAVIS, III, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00069-MP-GRJ

SECRETARY, FLORIDA

DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated August 23, 2013. (Doc. 37). The parties have been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, (doc.

1) is DENIED.
Page 2 of 2

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules

Governing Section 2254 Cases in the U.S. District Courts.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2013

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00069-MP-GRJ
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A18D0507. JEFFREY NELSON v. THE STATE.

The State filed a notice of appeal from a trial court order granting Jeffrey

Nelson’s motion to dismiss his Fulton County State Court criminal case. The case has

been docketed in this Court as Case No. A18A1750. When Nelson attempted to file

his Appellee’s Brief in A18A1750, the brief was inadvertently docketed as a

discretionary application and assessed Application No. A18D0507.Because it is clear

from the filings that Nelson intended to file his responsive brief rather than a

discretionary application, Application No. A18D0507 is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

June 29, 2018

06/29/2018
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 3:09cr84/MCR

CLAYTON ELLIS BARNES

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the

defendant, CLAYTON ELLIS BARNES, to the one count indictment returned against

him is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing

as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of September, 2009.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00338-CV

MARK STRAUSS ENTERPRISES, INC., D/B/A AUSTIN AUTO TRADERS

v.

JONATHAN WASHBURN AND AMELIA GOMEZ

On Appeal from the

200th District Court of Travis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. D-1-GN-20-006757

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 26, 2022
# C_2009149EN.01001501.xml

| 1.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/15

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/99/09

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2009/C 149/08

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition EPSO/AST/99/09 to recruit proofreaders (AST 3) with English (EN) as their main language.

The competition notice is published in Official Journal C 149 A of 1 July 2009 in English only.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
# C_2009267EN.01000502.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/5

---

Taking of the oath by the new Members of the Court of First Instance

2009/C 267/09

Following their appointment as Judges at the Court of First Instance of the European Communities for the period from 1 September 2009 to 31 August 2010 (Mr Kanninen) and from 7 October 2009 to 31 August 2010 (Mr Schwarcz) by decisions of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Communities of 25 February 2009 (1) and 8 July 2009 (2) respectively, Mr Kanninen and Mr Schwarcz took the oath before the Court of Justice on 6 October 2009.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 56 of 28 February 2009, p. 17.

1

(2)  OJ L 181 of 14 July 2009, p. 25.

2

---
# C_2009024EN.01001401.xml

| 30.1.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/14

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5355 — BASF/Ciba)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 24/07)

| 1. | On 22 January 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which BASF SE (‘BASF’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Ciba Holding AG (‘Ciba’, Switzerland) by way of public bid announced on 15 September 2008. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 22 January 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which BASF SE (‘BASF’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of Ciba Holding AG (‘Ciba’, Switzerland) by way of public bid announced on 15 September 2008.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for BASF: chemicals, plastics, performance products, agricultural products and fine chemicals, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for BASF: chemicals, plastics, performance products, agricultural products and fine chemicals,

| — | for Ciba: specialty chemicals. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Ciba: specialty chemicals.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5355 — BASF/Ciba, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5355 — BASF/Ciba, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Flickering Star
Financial, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Ginger B. Quealy, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: February 17, 2006                  By: /s/ GINGER B. QUEALY
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Ginger B. Quealy
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          and Director



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO FLICKERING STAR FINANCIAL, INC.,
AND WILL BE RETAINED BY FLICKERING STAR FINANCIAL, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
#### LOVING CO. v. CONTRACTOR, INC.

No. 23 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 597.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 1 April 1980. Motion of plaintiff to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 April 1980.
# C_2009154EN.01000301.xml

| 7.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 July 2009

2009/C 154/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3897 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,44 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4461 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86120 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9205 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5198 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0540 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,954 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 273,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6969 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3870 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2083 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1540 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7605 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6193 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7704 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2175 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0265 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 762,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,1350 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,4979 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3296 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 217,14 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9265 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 67,069 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,8110 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,424 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7401 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,5490 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,5050 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3897

JPY

Japanese yen

132,44

DKK

Danish krone

7,4461

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86120

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9205

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5198

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0540

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,954

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

273,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6969

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3870

RON

Romanian leu

4,2083

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1540

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7605

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6193

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7704

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2175

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0265

KRW

South Korean won

1 762,78

ZAR

South African rand

11,1350

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,4979

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3296

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 217,14

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9265

PHP

Philippine peso

67,069

RUB

Russian rouble

43,8110

THB

Thai baht

47,424

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7401

MXN

Mexican peso

18,5490

INR

Indian rupee

67,5050

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 10

- 00253

- CV

Matt HORNER , Melissa Staggs, and Silver Horsman, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

MMR JOINT VENTURES LTD ., and CG Encino Commons, LLC,

Antonia Citrino and Joseph Geiger,

Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008

- CVF

- 001276

- D1

Honorable Fred Shannon , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca S immons , Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 27, 2010

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion, in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 42.1(a)(2), stating they have resolved the dispute at issue and requesting this court

dismiss t his appeal. The motion is granted and the appeal is hereby dismissed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P.

42.1(a)(2).

PER CURIAM
# C_2009083EN.01001702.xml

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/17

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4993 — EDF/EnBW/Kogeneracja)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/04

On 11 March 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition website (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M4993. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M4993. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ROBERT S. GLAZER, PH.D., P.A.,

d/b/a BIOENERGETICS PRESS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-110-SPM-GRJ

FREDERIC LOWEN, an individual,

as executor or personal representative of the

estate of ALEXANDER LOWEN, M.D.,

deceased, any beneficiary, heir at law, creditor, 

person, or entity claiming an interest in his

property or his probate estate,

Defendants.

____________________________ /

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Stipulated Motion To Amend Certain Scheduling

Order Deadlines. (Doc. 99.) The parties request an extension of the deadlines for

amending pleadings and an extension of the deadline for serving certain expert reports

so that the parties can conclude a final settlement and execute the necessary

documentation. 

Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED that:

The Stipulated Motion To Amend Certain Scheduling Order Deadlines (Doc. 99)

is GRANTED. The deadline to amend pleadings and the deadline to serve expert

reports by the party bearing the burden of proof are extended to September 23, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16 day of September, 2011. 

th

s/ Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00110-SPM-GRJ Document 100 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 PENSACOLA DIVISION

DYLAN HENDRIEX, II,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO.: 3:09cv345/LAC/MD

WALTER A. MCNEIL,

Respondent.

O R D E R

Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

(Doc. 1). However, petitioner has failed to use the court form for filing his petition. Local

Rule 5.1(J) for the Northern District of Florida states that the court will not accept for

consideration a petition under § 2254 unless the appropriate form is completed. N.D. Fla.

Loc. R. 5.1(J). Thus, petitioner must file his petition on the form for use in § 2254 cases,

even if he wants to attach separate pages explaining the facts that underlie this action.

To amend his petition, petitioner should completely fill out the § 2254 form, marking

it “Amended Petition.” Petitioner is advised that the amended petition must contain all of

his grounds for relief, and it should not in any way refer to the previously filed materials. 

The amended petition completely replaces all previous petitions. Once an amended

petition is filed, all earlier petitions are disregarded. N. D. Fla. Loc. R. 15.1. 

Petitioner has also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2). However,

petitioner’s application is deficient. A complete application to proceed in forma pauperis

includes a motion with supporting affidavit, a prisoner consent form and a financial

certificate with attachments (a printout of the transactions in petitioner’s inmate trust

account for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition). Petitioner

has provided a printout for only a four-month period. 
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk of court shall forward to the petitioner the form for use in § 2254

cases. This case number shall be written on the form.

2. Within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, petitioner shall file his

amended petition, which shall be typed or clearly written, and submitted on the court form.

3. Within the same time period, petitioner shall submit a printout of

transactions in his inmate account for the months of February and May of 2009. In the

alternative, petitioner shall submit payment of $5.00 to the clerk of this court.

4. Petitioner’s failure to comply with this order as directed will result in a

recommendation of dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and failure to comply

with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9 day of September, 2009.

th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 5:08cv238/RS/MD
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cr51-SPM/WCS

ROLANDO MACIAS,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY PLEA

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to

the Court’s consideration of any Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

11(e)(2), the plea of guilty of the defendant, ROLANDO MACIAS., to Count One

of the indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this

Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of August, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
#### STATE v. MOFFITT

No. 183 PC.

Case below: 9 N.C. App. 694.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 August 1972.
Case 1:07-cr-00382-JFK Document 21 Filed 05/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009106EN.01002601.xml

| 8.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/26

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5467 — RWE/Essent)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 106/09

| 1. | On 29 April 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking RWE Aktiengesellschaft (‘RWE’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Essent N.V. (‘Essent’, the Netherlands) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 29 April 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking RWE Aktiengesellschaft (‘RWE’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Essent N.V. (‘Essent’, the Netherlands) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | RWE: electricity and natural gas, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

RWE: electricity and natural gas,

| — | Essent: electricity, natural gas and heating. |
| --- | --- |

—

Essent: electricity, natural gas and heating.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 2 2964301 or 2967244) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5467 — RWE/Essent, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 2 2964301 or 2967244) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5467 — RWE/Essent, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---