#### ANNA MAE ALLEN, MILLICENT C. BAILEY, DOROTHY IRENE BALL, C. ELIZABETH BROWN, MARJORIE L. BROWN, WILLIE MAE BROWN, D. L. BRYANT, MARY CALLAHAM, SHIRLEY CARRIKER, EDWARD D. CASEY, E. L. CLOANIGER, JR., W. H. DAVIS, ROY T. ELLIS, JR., E. JUNE JOY, H. L. JUSTICE, R. F. KISTLER, PEGGY McCRANIE, E. E. QUEEN, REBECCA SCHOLL, KATHERINE K. SNAVELY, DOLORES SHEETS, LEE L. STICKLEY, ROBERT R. TATUM, MIRIAM P. THOMPSON, AILEEN E. WARNER and KATHRYN C. WEISNER, for themsleves and in behalf of all other employees of the SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY having a common interest in the subject matter of this action, Plaintiffs, and BICKETT BASS, MARY B. CROSBY, GEORGE D. ATWELL, HAROLD B. HACKNEY, *701CELESTIA S. SMITH, CRAVEN SMITH, R. P. POWELL, H. L. NUSSMAN, J. B. NUSSMAN, SR., JOHN W. JORDAN, and L. J. BYRUM, Additional Plaintiffs v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BOILERMAKERS, IRON SHIP BUILDERS AND HELPERS OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF BLACKSMITHS, DROP FORGERS AND HELPERS, SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY CARMEN OF AMERICA, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF FIREMEN, OILERS, HELPERS, ROUNDHOUSE AND RAILWAY SHOP LABORERS, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYEES, BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYEES, THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS, BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF MASTERS, MATES AND PILOTS, NATIONAL MARINE ENGINEERS BENEFICIAL ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN TRAIN DISPATCHERS OF AMERICA AND RAILWAY EMPLOYEES’ DEPARTMENT OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR, Defendants.

(Filed 11 April, 1962.)

1. Appeal and Error § 39—

Where, on a petition to rehear, the Justices of the Supreme Court are evenly divided in opinion, one Justice not participating, the judgment will stand without becoming a precedent.

Sharp, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.

On petition to rehear.

This action was instituted by named non-union employees of Southern Railway Company for injunctive relief. Plaintiffs allege that they were notified they would be discharged from their jobs if they did not j oin one of defendant Unions and pay to it fees, dues and assessments, and that this notice was given them pursuant to provisions of a Union shop agreement between the Railway Company and defendant Unions. The provisions of the agreement in question are authorized by the Amendment to the Railway Labor Act of 10 January 1951 (64 Stat. 1 238, 45 U.S.C.A., s. 152, Eleventh). Plaintiffs seek generally to restrain collection from them of any dues, fees or assessments not reasonably necessary and related to collective bargaining.

*Blakeney, Alexander & Machen for plaintiffs appellees.*

*Schoene & Kramer and J. B. Craighill for defendant Unions, appellants.*

*702Per Curiam.

This case was before this Court at the Fall Term 1958. An opinion, delivered by *Bobbitt, J.,*for a majority of the Court was filed at the Spring Term 1959. *Allen v. R. R.,*249 N.C. 491, 107 S.E. 2d 125. That opinion gives an adequate summary of the pleadings, evidence, issues of fact, preliminary proceedings, and judgment in the trial court. A repetition of these matters and a restatement of the legal questions involved are unnecessary here.

After our decision at the Spring Term 1959, plaintiffs, in apt time, filed a petition to rehear. The petition was allowed on 20 May 1959 by the two Justices to whom it was referred, but the Court deferred rehearing pending decision on appeal in a Georgia case originally captioned *Looper v. Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co.,*213 Ga. 279, 99 S.E. 2d 101, and later captioned *International Association of Machinists v. Street,*215 Ga. 27, 108 S.E. 2d 796.

The Unions, under 28 U.S.C.A., s. 1257 (1), appealed the latter decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia to the Supreme Court of the United States which, on October 12, 1959, noted probable jurisdiction. 361 U.S. 807, 4 L. Ed. 2d 54, 80 S. Ct. 84. The cause was argued twice in the Supreme Court of the United States, having been reargued on January 17 and 18, 1961. It was decided June 19, 1961. *International Association of Machinists v. Street,*367 U.S. 740, 6 L. Ed. 2d 1141, 81 S. Ct. 1784.

After the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the *Street*case, a rehearing of our former decision, by oral arguments and by briefs, was held.

Before a decision acceptable to and in accordance with the opinion of a majority of this Court was reached, *Winbome, C.J.,*retired from the Court, *Denny, J.,*was elevated to *Chief Justice,*and *Sharp, J.,*was appointed to fill the vacancy on the Court. *Justice Sharp,*formerly a Superior Court Judge, is disqualified and declines to take part in the consideration and decision of this appeal for the reason that she presided at a hearing and entered an interlocutory order in this case at the Superior Court level.

This leaves the Court evenly divided. Three Justices are of the opinion that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed. Three are of the opinion that there was error in the trial below.

The Court being equally divided, the judgment below is affirmed. The judgment appealed from stands, but not as a precedent. *Schoenith v. Realty Co.,*244 N.C. 601, 94 S.E. 2d 592; *Ward v. Odell,*126 N.C. 946, 36 S.E. 194.

Affirmed.

SháRP, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.