alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7343

MICHAEL MCNEILL, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. OFFICER 1ST MR. GERMANY; UNIT MANAGER MR. WALL, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:08-cv-00498-GCM)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael McNeill, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael McNeill appeals the district court’s order denying as moot his motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McNeill v. Germany , No. 3:08-cv-00498-GCM (W.D.N.C. July 14, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2009031EN.01000201.xml

| 7.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/2

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case COMP/M.5262 — Bonnier/Schibsted/Retriever Sverige)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 31/02)

On 29 January 2009, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference COMP/M.5262 — Bonnier/Schibsted/Retriever Sverige, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---
# C_2009272EN.01001201.xml

| 13.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/12

---

Special Report No 10/2009 ‘Information provision and promotion measures for agricultural products’

2009/C 272/06

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 10/2009 ‘Information provision and promotion measures for agricultural products’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form at EU Bookshop.

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BENJAMIN B. LITTLES,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv203/MCR/EMT

B. RICKARD,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation issued by the undersigned on

November 23, 2010 (doc. 16), it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant B. Rickard be DISMISSED with prejudice

for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

2. That the clerk enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 31st day of October 2011.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case 3:10-cv-00203-MCR-EMT Document 27 Filed 10/31/11 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-8 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-8 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 17-8 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 3 of 3
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICARDO ERNESTO RODRIGUEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-73278 

Agency No. A095-749-060 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 28, 2020**

Before: TROTT, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Ricardo Ernesto Rodriguez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an 

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen removal 

proceedings and to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We 

review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen or reconsider. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 1 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-73278 

Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002). We deny the petition for 

review.

The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodriguez’s motion to 

reopen his removal proceedings. Rodriguez did not support his motion with 

anything other than his counsel’s statements, no affidavits or evidentiary material 

whatsoever. Moreover, he did not demonstrate why the evidence counsel 

referenced could not have been discovered before or presented at his hearing. In 

addition, he did not demonstrate that the evidence he sought to submit would likely 

have changed the outcome of his case. See Shin v. Mukasey, 547 F.3d 1019, 1025 

(9th Cir. 2008) (setting out the standard for a motion to reopen and noting that 

petitioners who seek to reopen proceedings to pursue relief “bear a ‘heavy burden’ 

of proving that, if proceedings were reopened, the new evidence would likely 

change the result in the case” (citation omitted)).

The agency also did not abuse its discretion in denying Rodriguez’s motion 

to reconsider, where his motion failed to identify any error of fact or law in the IJ’s 

prior order. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(2).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cytori Therapeutics, Inc.; |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 29, 2014                    |
|-----------------------------------------|
| /s/ Marc H. Hedrick                     |   |
| Marc H. Hedrick                         |
| President & Chief Executive Officer |

----
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

vs. 3:10cr6/MCR

JAMES D. RAMSEY,

 Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11,

Fed.R.Crim.P., and has entered a plea of guilty to the two count indictment against

him. After cautioning and examining the defendant under oath concerning the

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable

and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis

in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guiltybe accepted and that the defendant be adjudicated

guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: March 15, 2010

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within 24 hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARIA CYNTHIA BUSTAMANTE,

Appellant, §

§ No. 08

- 18

- 00037

- CR

Appeal from the

V. §

County Criminal Court No. 4

THE STATE OF TEXAS, §

of El Paso County, Texas

§

Appellee.

§ (TC# 20140C06099 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WALTON CONSTRUCTION 

COMPANY LLC,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10v137-SPM/WCS

CORUS BANK, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO WITHDRAW THE REFERENCE

This cause comes before the Court on the Motion to Withdraw the

Reference (doc. 1) of counts eight through seventeen of the adversary

proceeding. Defendants Starwood Capital Group Global, LLC, Starwood Asset

Management, LLC, and Laketown Funding, LLC do not oppose the withdrawal. 

For good cause shown, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Motion to Withdraw the Reference (doc. 1) is granted.

2. Counts eight through seventeen are withdrawn from the adversary

proceeding. 

3. On or before September 13, 2010, the parties shall submit a
Page 2 of 2

discovery plan in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f).

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:10v137-SPM/WCS
# C_2009093EN.01001601.xml

| 22.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/16

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 April 2009

2009/C 93/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2932 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,82 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4492 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88860 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,1760 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5114 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7940 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,035 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 300,35 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7093 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4177 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2438 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1511 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8509 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6051 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0223 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3347 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9493 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 744,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,8312 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8354 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3839 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 063,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7131 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,700 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,1807 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,986 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9052 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3677 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,2710 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2932

JPY

Japanese yen

126,82

DKK

Danish krone

7,4492

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88860

SEK

Swedish krona

11,1760

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5114

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7940

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,035

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

300,35

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7093

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4177

RON

Romanian leu

4,2438

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1511

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8509

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6051

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0223

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3347

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9493

KRW

South Korean won

1 744,00

ZAR

South African rand

11,8312

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8354

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3839

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 063,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7131

PHP

Philippine peso

62,700

RUB

Russian rouble

44,1807

THB

Thai baht

45,986

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9052

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3677

INR

Indian rupee

65,2710

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 23

### CFR Correction

In Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 59, revised as of January 1, 2007, on page 227, in § 23.561, remove the five paragraphs beginning with the second paragraph (d)(1)(i) through paragraph (d)(1)(v).

[FR Doc. 07-55522 Filed 12-21-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development                               ( print page 63917)                            Special Emphasis Panel Institutional Research Training Grant (T32) applications.                    

*Date:*                         December 3, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         4 p.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852. (Telephone Conference Call.)                    

*Contact Person:*                         Anne Krey, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-6908.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 2, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5618 Filed 11-09-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Thomas S. McHugh, Chief Financial
Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 22, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas S. McHugh   
|                     |  |  |  | Thomas S. McHugh       
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Order entered January 16, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01126
- CV CITIMORTGAGE, INC., Appellant
V. ERIC SCZEPANIK AND ALL OT HER OCCUPANTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas Coun ty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 11
- 08775
- A 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellee’s January 14, 2013 unopposed second motion to extend time to file appellee’s brief. We GRANT appellee’s motion. Appellee’s brief shall be filed on or before January 28, 20 13.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
#### IN RE LASSITER

No. 144 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 525.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied and appeal dismissed 8 January 1980.
NIOSH National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health

Date: Scale: Title:

DRG No.:

DWG. Size:

A

Units:

NCL5-A-001 Rev. 1

4/15/2014 None NIOSH GEN5-E LED Cap Lamp Exploded View

AS568A-227 O-Ring Size, 1/8" width, Material: Ethylene Proplene ( EP-70, Actual Size 2.387"-OD 2.109"-ID )

(NIOSH Dwg. NCL5-P-002 Rev.1)

(NIOSH Dwg. NCL5-P-003 Rev.1)

(NIOSH Dwg. NCL5-P-004 Rev.0)

(See NIOSH Dwg, NCL5-A-002 Rev1)

(M3-0.5 x 6mm)

(2 - M3-0.5 x 10mm)

(Dwg. PCB0137-01 Rev.A)

Bill of Material: NCL5-BOM-001 Rev. 1

(6-32 x 0.25" Rd. Hd. w/lockwashers 2 Req)

NIOSH GEN5 Bezel 

 Lens 

NIOSH O-Ring Seal 

NIOSH GEN5 Lens Spacer 

NIOSH LED Driver Circuit Board with Switch 

Circuit Board Attaching Screws and Lockwasher

Circuit Board Standoffs

Metal Headpiece Shell

Cable/Lens Locking Tab and Screw

(Button Head Screw M3-0.5 x 12mm)

NIOSH LED Driver Board Switch 

Locking Nut and Washer 

 Cap Lamp Attaching Clip and Charging Housing with Hardware

NIOSH GEN5 Lens Mounting Plate and Spacer 

NIOSH GEN5 Lens Mounting Plate and Spacer Mounting Screw

(6-32 x 0.375" Flat Head)

NIOSH GEN5 LED/Lens Mounting Plate Screws

NIOSH GEN5 LED Mounting Plate Assembly
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
                  United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vycor Medical, Inc.,
                  a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that: 1.The amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
                     31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the
                     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934, and 2.The information contained in the amended Form 10-Q fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                     operations of the Company.
 Date: September 2, 2011  /s/ Adrian LiddellAdrian LiddellPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
                     has been provided to VYCOR MEDICAL, INC. and will be retained by
                     VYCOR MEDICAL, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
                     Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-03582-LLS   Document 199    Filed 03/26/10   Page 1 of 1