alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Optio Software, Inc.

Atlanta, Ga. 

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of Optio Software, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-39028) of our report dated April 24, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of OptioSoftware, Inc. and subsidiaries appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2006. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

April 28, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 10.1
                                                               PAGE 1 of 2

                 MODIFICATION OF LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

WHEREAS this agreement is in reference to a loan which is evidenced by an 
instrument entitled LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT ("AGREEMENT"), dated May 21, 
1996, executed by and between LEE PHARMACEUTICALS as "BORROWER" and PREFERRED 
BUSINESS CREDIT, INC. ("PBC"), as "LENDER."

NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by the undersigned parties that the AGREEMENT 
shall be amended in the following respect:

   In Section 2.1(a) of the Agreement, PBC agrees to make revolving 
   advances to Borrower in an amount equal to the lesser of (I) Seventy 
   five percent (75%) of the amount of Eligible Accounts; and (II) an 
   amount equal to Borrower's cash collections for the immediately 
   preceding forty-five (45) day period.

   In Section 2.1(b) of the Agreement, PBC agrees to make revolving 
   advances to Borrower in an amount equal to the lesser of (I) twenty five 
   percent (25%) of the amount of Eligible Inventory, (II) the outstanding 
   balance of advances against Eligible Accounts and (III) Four Hundred 
   Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($400,000.00) evidenced by a Secured 
   Promissory Note dated May 15, 1998.
   
   In Section 2.1 of the Agreement, PBC shall have no obligation to make 
   advances hereunder to the extent they would cause the outstanding 
   balance of revolving advances under this Section 2.1 to exceed a maximum 
   amount of One Million One Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars 
   ($1,100,000.00).
   
   In Section 2.4(a) of the Agreement, The obligations shall bear interest, 
   on the average Daily Balance, at a rate of Five percentage points (5%) 
   above the Prime Rate.
   
   In Section 3.1 of the Agreement, This Agreement shall become effective 
   and shall continue in full force and effect for a term ending May 21, 
   2000.

   In Section 3.3 of the Agreement, After May 21, 1999, the Borrower has 
   the option, on ninety (90) days prior written notice to PBC, to 
   terminate this Agreement on a date other than an anniversary of the 
   effective date by paying to PBC, in cash, the Obligation together with 
   all accrued and unpaid interest and expense and a prepayment penalty of 
   Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000.00).

<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 10.1
                                                               PAGE 2 of 2

   Borrower hereby rescind the termination letter dated February 16, 1998.

Except as noted above, all the terms, conditions and provisions of said 
AGREEMENT shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

DATE:  May 15, 1998

PREFERRED BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.    AGREED AND ACCEPTED:
                                   LEE PHARMACEUTICALS

BY: /s/ Farhad Motia 
   ----------------------------
    Farhad Motia, President
                                   BY: /s/ Ronald G. Lee
                                      ------------------------
                                      Ronald G. Lee, President
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14-3 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LAMAR PENNY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 329 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

TODD SCHAEFFER,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2022-2144

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in No. 1:20-cv-01498-RTH, Judge Ryan T. Holte.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

PER CURIAM.

O R D E R

Todd Schaeffer moves to stay the mandate, ECF Nos. 

29 and 30. 

On November 17, 2022, this court granted the government’s motion to dismiss this appeal as untimely and issued the mandate in accordance with Federal Circuit Rule 

41. Mr. Schaffer has shown no basis to recall the mandate; 

nor does the court understand his filing as either seeking 

Case: 22-2144 Document: 31 Page: 1 Filed: 12/23/2022
2 SCHAEFFER v. US

rehearing or reconsideration of the court’s order or requesting additional time in which to do so. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The confidential and non-confidential versions of the 

motion are accepted for filing and denied.

December 23, 2022

 Date

 FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

Case: 22-2144 Document: 31 Page: 2 Filed: 12/23/2022
02%-iS

Bublic

Tjefender^

Harris County, Texas

August 11,2014

Ronnie Anthony Bryant

TDCJ # 01310399

Willacy County State Jail

1695 South Buffalo Drive

Raymondville, TX 78580

Re: Ronnie Bryant v. State ofTexas, cause number 1338550

Dear Ronnie:

1201 Franklin Street, 13th Floor

Houston, Texas 77002

713.368.0016

713.368.9278 eFax

RECEIVED \H

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JUN 29 2015

AbelAcosta,Clerk

I was surprised when I received your recent letter asking for an update on your appeal. After

reviewing the records in your case, I discovered to my surprise that I made the mistake of failing to send you

a copy of the opinion in your case which was issued in December of 2013. I have enclosed a copy of the

opinion with this letter.

Let me first apologize for failing to send you a copyoftheopinion in your case. I have handled a lot

of appeals and this is the first time TrTaye made a mistake in this regard, I cahToffer°any explanation as to

howthis happened, otherthan to say that it was an oversight on my part because 1was under tl^irnprretsiorT

u^tTnadalready^sent you a copy. However, areview ofrrryTle^6Tr8sTmHcates that you were not sent a^opyT"-

After a conviction is affirmed on appeal, as is the situation in your case, there is the option to file

something known as a Petition for Discretionary Review, also known as a PDR. A PDR is an instrument

where you ask the Court of Criminal Appeals, the highest criminal court in Texas, to hear your case on appeal

and must be filed withiji^O days of t.he_opiniori ofthe Court of Appeals. The Court of Criminal Appeals

doesn't have to hear your case because they get to pick and choose the cases that they hear. A PDR is the

instrument you use to ask them to hear your case. If the Court of Criminal Appeals grants your PDR, then

you have to try to win your case in the same way as you would before the Court of Appeals. The Court of

Criminal Appeals only grants about 10% of the PDRs that are submitted to it. Typically, they only grant

PDRs on cases that involve complicated legal questions or the interpretations of new laws.

Here is a more detailed explanation about PDRs that is contained in the intro letter we sent to you

when you first indicated you wished to appeal your conviction:
#### GEORGE WALTON WILLIAMS v. CARL WAYNE BRAY.

(Filed 6 March, 1968.)

Appeal by defendant 'from *Hasty, J.,*24 April 1967 Non-Jury Civil Session of Guilford (Greensboro Division). This case’ was docketed and argued at Fall Term 1967 as No. 689.

Civil action to recover damages for personal injuries and property damage allegedly resulting from automobile' collision occurring on 20 October 1963.

The issues raised and the principles of law applicable thereto in the case of *Marie Moose Williams v. Carl Wayne Bray,*decided this day, are identical with the issues raised and the principles of law applicable and decisive- of the case of *George Walton Williams v. Carl Wayne Bray.*

*Max D. Ballinger for plaintiff.*

*Jordan, Wright, Henson & Nichols and William L. Stocks for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Upon authority of *Marie Moose Williams v. Carl Wayne Bray,*decided this day, and the cases therein cited, we hold that the trial, court correctly disallowed defendant’s motions to vacate and set aside the original summons.

Affirmed.

Husicins, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BROADCAST MUSIC, INC.; MJ PUBLISHING

TRUST d/b/a MIJAC MUSIC; UNIVERSAL

– SONGS OF POLYGRAM INTERNATIONAL,

INC.; PLAINVIEW DINER MUSIC; VERY TONY

MUSIC; GIBBS BROTHERS MUSIC; CROMPTON

SONGS; EMI VIRGIN SONGS, INC. d/b/a EMI 

LONGITUDE MUSIC; EMI BLACKWOOD MUSIC, 

INC.; WATERS OF NAZARETH PUBLISHING;

YOUNG JEEZY MUSIC; TOOMPSTONE 

PUBLISHING; HENSTONE PUBLISHING; 

MUSICWORKS;

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 3:10cv119/MCR/MD

AHN T. NGOC TRAN and DON TRAN,

both individual and d/b/a BARLEY’S,

Defendants.

________________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is brought under the United States Copyright Act of 1976 (“Copyright

Act”), as amended, 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq. The plaintiffs filed their Complaint (doc. 1)

on April 21, 2010, alleging ten instances of copyright infringement. The defendants failed

to answer or otherwise defend against the plaintiffs’ Complaint; the clerk thus entered

defaults against them (docs. 7, 8) on July 8, 2010. On August 13, 2010, the plaintiffs filed

a Motion for Final Default Judgment (doc. 9), to which the defendants have not responded. 

Having reviewed the plaintiffs’ motion and supporting affidavits, as well as the Complaint,

the court finds that the plaintiffs are entitled to a final default judgment in their favor in the

amount requested.

 
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ motion for a final default

judgment (doc. 9) is GRANTED and that the plaintiffs are entitled to recover statutory

damages from the defendants, jointly and severally, in the amount of $30,000.00, plus

attorneys’ fees in an amount to be determined by separate order. The plaintiffs shall have 1

thirty (30) days in which to submit support for their attorney’s fee claim, in accordance with

Local Rule 54.1. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of February, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

W hen a plaintiff seeks statutory damages in an amount exceeding the $750 minimum, the

1

defendants have a right, under the Seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, to a jury

determination of the amount of statutory damages. See, Feltner v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc., 523

U.S. 340, 342 (1998). Because the defendants failed to make a demand for a jury trial, however, they waived

that right. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(d).

Case No: 3:10cv119/MCR/MD
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


CA2009116EN.01000301.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 116/3 |

---

Corrigendum to the notices of open competitions EPSO/AD/163/09 — Administrators (AD 6/AD 9) in the field of Data Protection and EPSO/AST/90/09 — Assistants (AST 3) in the field of Data Protection

(
[Official Journal of the European Union C 98 A of 29 April 2009](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2009_098_A_TOC)
)

(2009/C 116 A/02)

On page 6, Section III.2 ‘Specific conditions’, point 2.3:

for:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘(b) | Language 2 | | Second language (must be different from language 1): a satisfactory knowledge of English or French.’, |

read:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘(b) | Language 2 | | Second language (must be different from language 1): a satisfactory knowledge of German, English or French.’; |

on page 11, in Section III.2 ‘Specific conditions’, point 2.3:

for:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘(b) | Language 2 | | Second language (must be different from language 1): a satisfactory knowledge of English or French.’, |

read:

| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | | | --- | --- | | ‘(b) | Language 2 | | Second language (must be different from language 1): a satisfactory knowledge of German, English or French.’. |

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Global MobileTech, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Hon Kit Wong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  February 10, 2011

By:  /s/ Hon Kit Wong

 

       Hon Kit Wong

 

       Chief Financial Officer

 

       (Principal Financial and   

        Accounting Officer)

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32



American Capital Agency Corp.

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



We, Malon Wilkus, Chief
Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of Directors, and John R. Erickson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Capital Agency Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                                                          
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: July 31, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    MALON
WILKUS                                                      
|                    |  |     |  | Malon Wilkus Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |    
|Date: July 31, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/    JOHN R.
ERICKSON                                                  
|                    |  |     |  | John R. Erickson Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer    



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Moody National REIT I, Inc. 10-Q




EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Moody National REIT I, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certifies, to his knowledge, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 16, 2011








/s/ Robert W. EngelRobert W. EngelChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

PROFESSIONAL TITLE LLC,

AVEST LLC and

MICHAEL AVIS

MICHAEL HOWELL,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-72/RS-EMT

FDIC, as receiver for the 

Bank of Bonifay, 

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

The relief requested in the Joint Motion for Entry of Agreed Order (Doc. 49), 

which is construed as a motion for leave to extend response deadline, is GRANTED. 

Plaintiffs shall file their response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss not later than March 

7, 2011. 

ORDERED on March 4, 2011

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice                           ( print page 56779)                        is hereby given of the following meeting.                

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, Fragile X Research Center Revision Applications.                    

*Date:*                         October 29-30, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Renaissance Mayflower Hotel, 1127 Connecticut Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20036.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485,                         *changn@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 27, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-4927 Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Liberty Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company. /s/ Hayne Hipp
    
    /s/ Howard L. SchrottHayne Hipp
    
    Howard L. SchrottChief Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial OfficerAugust 3, 2004
    
    August 3, 2004
 19