alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 1 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 2 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 3 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 4 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 5 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 6 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 7 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 8 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 9 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 10 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 11 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 12 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 13 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 14 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 15 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 16 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 17 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 18 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 19 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 20 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 21 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 22 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 23 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 24 of 25

Case 4:10-cv-00187-MP-WCS   Document 1   Filed 05/17/10   Page 25 of 25
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of BSV VI, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 (the “Report”), I,
      Douglas A. Dyer, the President and the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
      Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                November 10, 2008By:
            /s/
                DOUGLAS A. DYERDouglas
                A. Dyer
              President
                and Director
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
              (Principal
                Financial and Accounting Officer)
# C_2009124EN.01001601.xml

| 4.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 124/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124/16

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/176/09

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2009/C 124/06

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition EPSO/AD/176/09 to recruit conference interpreters (AD 5/AD 7) with Finnish as their main language.

The competition notice is published in Official Journal C 124 A of 4 June 2009 in Finnish only.

Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu

---
#### STATE v. SELLERS

No. 481P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 43.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982. Motion by Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 21 September 1982.
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 13-7 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 15 of 15
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 8, 2009

d0505 

# Order

May 8, 2009

138759

In re BABY BOY MARZELL GROVESHEALY, SHAMAR TONY GROVEPATRICK, and SHAWNTA ́ COOPERGROVE, Minors.

________________ _______________ __________/

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 138759 COA: 286790 Wayne CC Family Division: JIQUETTA TRINA GROVE, a/k/a, 07-475632 JIQUETTA TRINI GROVE, Respondent-Appellant,

and

SEBASTIAN PATRICK, Respondent.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the March 31, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
2013 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
4-16-2013 

# I n R e: T a r ir eef W hit e P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ock e t N o . 12-3603

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2013

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2013 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du
. R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" I n R e: T a r ir e ef W hit e " (2013). 2013 D e cisio n s . P a pe r 984. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2013/984

### H LD

- 001 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 12

- 3603

___________ IN RE : TARIREEF WHITE , Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus fro m the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (Related to D. Del. Crim. No. 07

- cr - 00123 and Civ. No. 10

- cv - 00132 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

November 2, 2012 Before: McKEE , Chief Jud ge , ALDISERT and BARRY , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : April 16, 2013 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM Petitioner Tarireef White filed a petition for writ of mandamus on September 27, 2012 , asking us to order the District Court to render a de cision on his motion to vacate his
se ntence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. By order entered on March 18, 2013, the District Court dismissed White’s § 2255 motion and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. Because White has now received the relief he requested in his mandamus petition

— a decision on his § 2255

### 2

motion

— we will deny his mandamus petition as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny Ludlum Corp. , 77 F.3d 690, 698

- 99 (3d Cir. 1996)
.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2011344EN.01000801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 24.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/8 |

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

2011/C 344/05

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Routes concerned | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Arvidsjaur–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Gällivare–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Hemavan–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Lycksele–Stockholm/Arlanda | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Vilhelmina–Stockholm/Arlanda | |
| Period of validity of the contract | 3 June 2012-24 October 2015 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 60 days after the date of publication of this tender invitation |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligations can be obtained free of charge | | | | --- | | The Swedish Transport Administration | | SE-781 87 Borlänge | | SVERIGE | | http://www.eu-supply.com/trafikverket.asp | Ref. TRV 2011/76519 Tel. +46 771921921 Contact persons: Anna Fürst and Johan Holmér E-mail: anna.furst@trafikverket.se johan.holmer@trafikverket.se |

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2494 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2494

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide travel to Dover Air Force 
Base for family members of members of the Armed Forces who die outside 
 of the United States but not in a theater of combat operations so the 
family may receive the remains of the deceased, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2019

  Mr. Cotton (for himself and Ms. Duckworth) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide travel to Dover Air Force 
Base for family members of members of the Armed Forces who die outside 
 of the United States but not in a theater of combat operations so the 
family may receive the remains of the deceased, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fallen Heroes Family Travel Act of 
2019''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION OF REMAINS OF CASUALTIES; TRAVEL EXPENSES FOR 
              NEXT OF KIN.

    (a) Transportation for Remains of a Member Who Dies Not in a 
Theater of Combat Operations.--Section 562 of the John Warner National 
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Public Law 109-364; 10 
U.S.C. 1482 note) is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``dying in a theater of 
        combat operations''; and
            (2) in subsection (a), by striking ``in a combat theater of 
        operations'' and inserting ``outside of the United States''.
    (b) Transportation for Family.--The Secretary of Defense shall 
revise Department of Defense Instruction 1300.18 to extend travel 
privileges via Invitational Travel Authorization to family members of 
members of the Armed Forces who die outside of the United States and 
whose remains are returned to the United States through the mortuary 
facility at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of the
      Registrant for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Douglas A.
      Dyer, the President and the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer of the Registrant hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
      of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Dated:
      May 15, 2008




By:
            /s/
                DOUGLAS A. DYERDouglas
                A. DyerPresident
                and Director(Principal
                Executive Officer)(Principal
                Financial Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-03555-BSJ-THK Document 6 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03555-BSJ-THK Document 6 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03555-BSJ-THK Document 6 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6488

DEANTHONY DOANE,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of 

Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District 

Judge. (1:09-cv-01154-GBL-JFA)

Submitted: November 21, 2011 Decided: December 8, 2011

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

DeAnthony Doane, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

In Doane v. Johnson, No. 11-6675 (4th Cir. Nov. 18, 

2011) (unpublished), we denied a certificate of appealability 

and dismissed DeAnthony Doane’s appeal of the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

In the subject appeal, Doane seeks to appeal from the identical 

district court order. In light of our decision in No. 11-6675, 

we hold that this appeal is moot. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Apostolos Tamvakakis, certify that:

Date: May 15, 2012

/s/ APOSTOLOS TAMVAKAKIS Apostolos Tamvakakis Chief Executive Officer


---



CERTIFICATION

I,
Anthimos Thomopoulos, certify that:

Date: May 15, 2012

/s/ ANTHIMOS THOMOPOULOS Anthimos Thomopoulos Deputy Chief Executive Officer


---



CERTIFICATION

I,
Charalampos Mazarakis, certify that:

Date: May 15, 2012

/s/ CHARALAMPOS MAZARAKIS Charalampos Mazarakis Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ROGER RANKIN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cv24-SPM/WCS

DAVID HARVEY, SHERIFF,

WAKULLA COUNTY, FLORIDA,

in his official capacity,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER STAYING CASE PENDING APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT

This cause comes before the Court on the Amended Mediation Report

(doc. 27) advising that the parties have reached a settlement agreement that is

contingent upon approval of the Bankruptcy Court. Upon consideration, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. This case is stayed pending a decision by the Bankruptcy Court on

approval of the settlement. 

2. The parties shall file a written notice with the Court when a decision

is made. 

3. If no decision is made by December 1, 2010, Plaintiff shall file a
Page 2 of 2

written report on the status of the bankruptcy proceedings. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:10cv24-SPM/WCS
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 2 Filed 07/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                          19,969
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,421
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    750,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               817,529
<PP&E>                                         270,294
<DEPRECIATION>                                (43,923)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,845,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          186,472
<BONDS>                                        920,445
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,599
<OTHER-SE>                                     711,675
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,845,234
<SALES>                                        196,949
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               272,166
<CGS>                                          161,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  187,109
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                46,511
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,698
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,848
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,421
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
        

</TABLE>
Presidential Documents

63963 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 218 

Tuesday, November 13, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of November 8, 2007 

Continuation of Emergency Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction 

On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States 

posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons 

‘‘weapons of mass destruction’’ and the means of delivering such weapons. 

On July 28, 1998, the President issued Executive Order 13094 amending 

Executive Order 12938 to respond more effectively to the worldwide threat 

of weapons of mass destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, 

I issued Executive Order 13382 which, inter alia, further amended Executive 

Order 12938 to improve our ability to combat proliferation. The proliferation 

of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them continues 

to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign 

policy, and economy of the United States; therefore, the national emergency 

first declared on November 14, 1994, and extended in each subsequent 

year, must continue. In accordance with section 202(d) of the National 

Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 12938, as amended. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

November 8, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–5657 

Filed 11–9–07; 8:54 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES3GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

_________________________________

BRETT ANDREW: HOUSE OF 

NELSON, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

DANIEL AUSTIN WALZL/STATE OF 

COLORADO,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 20-1425

(D.C. No. 1:20-CV-01012-LTB-GPG)

(D. Colo.)

_________________________________

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

_________________________________

Before BRISCOE, BALDOCK, and CARSON, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________

Pro se Plaintiff-Appellant brought this action in the United States District Court 

for the District of Colorado seeking to confirm an alleged $6,898,000 arbitration award 

against Defendant under the Federal Arbitration Act. The district court dismissed the 

action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and we affirmed. See Nelson v. Walzl, 

829 F. App’x 872 (10th Cir. 2020). 

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law 

of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its 

persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

** After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined 

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this 

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore 

ordered submitted without oral argument.

FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

January 27, 2021

Christopher M. Wolpert

Clerk of Court
2

Less than two months later, Plaintiff filed three post-judgment motions, each of 

which the district court denied. This appeal follows, but Plaintiff merely reiterates the 

same arguments we rejected in his prior appeal to this court. See id. That is, Plaintiff 

alleges the district court erred in concluding it lacked subject matter jurisdiction 

because, by his argument, subject matter jurisdiction is provided for in 9 U.S.C. § 9. 

Plaintiff presents no new arguments, facts, or law. Because we thoroughly 

addressed and rejected his contentions in Nelson v. Walzl, 829 F. App’x 872 (10th Cir. 

2020), we see no useful purpose in writing at length. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291, we AFFIRM. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP is DENIED.

Entered for the Court

Bobby R. Baldock

Circuit Judge