alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

____________________________________

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, by and )

 through BILL McCOLLUM, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT )

 OF HEALTH AND HUMAN )

 SERVICES, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of Court and all parties of record:

Please enter the appearance of Eric B. Beckenhauer, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil

Division, Federal Programs Branch, as counsel of record for Defendants in this case.

Dated: April 20, 2010 Respectfully submitted,

 /s/ Eric Beckenhauer 

ERIC B. BECKENHAUER

Cal. Bar No. 237526

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

20 Massachusetts Ave. NW

Washington, DC 20530

Telephone: (202) 514-3338

Facsimile: (202) 616-8470

E-mail: eric.beckenhauer@usdoj.gov

Counsel for Defendants

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 33 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 1
# CA2009059EN.01000101.xml

| 13.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 59/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 59/1

---

Corrigendum to the notice of open competitions to constitute a reserve pool of Administrators (AD 5) of Bulgarian, Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Romanian, Slovak and Slovenian citizenship in the field of public health:

EPSO/AD/144/09 — Public health

EPSO/AD/145/09 — Food safety (policy and legislation)

EPSO/AD/146/09 — Food safety (audit, inspection and evaluation)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 9 A of 14 January 2009
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 9 A of 14 January 2009

(2009/C 59 A/01)

On page 12, Title V(4):

for:

for:

‘Requests from candidates for access to information concerning them

Candidates involved in selection procedures have the specific right of access to certain information concerning them directly and individually, as described below. EPSO may accordingly provide candidates who so request with supplementary information relating to their participation in the competition. Candidates must send such requests in writing to EPSO within a month of being notified of their results in the competition. EPSO will reply within a month of receiving the request. Requests will be dealt with taking account of the confidential nature of selection board proceedings under the Staff Regulations (Annex III, Article 6) and in compliance with the rules on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data. Examples of the type of information which may be supplied are given in the Guide for Applicants, Section III.3.’,

read:

read:

‘Requests from candidates for access to information concerning them

Candidates involved in selection procedures have the specific right of access to certain information concerning them directly and individually, as described below. EPSO may therefore supply supplementary information on candidates’ participation in the competition at their request. Candidates must send such requests by e-mail to EPSO within 10 days of being notified of their results in the competition. Requests will be dealt with taking account of the confidential nature of selection board proceedings under the Staff Regulations (Annex III, Article 6) and in compliance with the rules on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data. Examples of the type of information which may be supplied are given in the Guide for Applicants, Section III.3 (however, only the deadline specified in this corrigendum is authentic).’;

on page 14, in the Annex:

for:

for:

‘Requests for review

Within 20 days of the letter informing you of the decision being sent to you online, send a letter stating your case to:’,

read:

read:

‘Requests for review

Within 10 days of the letter informing you of the decision being sent to you online, send a letter stating your case to:’.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Liberty Energy Coal Corp., (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edwin
G. Morrow, Chief Executive Officer, on the date indicated below, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


Date: August 15, 2011                  By: /s/ Edwin G. Morrow
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Edwin G. Morrow
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-2015

GEORGE R. “TEX” WOOD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CAMERON P. QUINN, Secretary of the Board of

Elections, Commonwealth of Virginia,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-00-335-3)

Submitted: September 7, 2000 Decided: September 8, 2000

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George R. “Tex” Wood, Appellant Pro Se. Mark L. Earley, Attorney

General, James Walter Hopper, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George R. “Tex” Wood appeals from the district court’s order

granting summary judgment for Defendant in Wood’s action challenging the constitutionality of Virginia’s requirements for

inclusion on the ballot as an independent candidate for the United

States Senate in the general election in Virginia. In light of the

time-sensitive nature of the issues, we have granted Wood’s motion

to expedite consideration of the appeal. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny Wood’s motion for an injunction

pending appeal and affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

See Wood v. Quinn, No. CA-00-335-3 (E.D. Va. July 17, 2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

AGCO CORPORATION,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09cv276/RS-AK

J. D. SWEARINGEN EQUIPMENT CO.,

INC.; J. D. SWEARINGEN, SR., Individually;

and RENA SWEARINGEN,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Stipulation of Dismissal (Doc. 33). 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed with prejudice.

2. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on August 13, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Mechanical Regulation of DNA Looping Kinetics.                    

*Date:*                         December 4, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 5B01, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Norman Chang, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive Blvd., Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-1485,                         *changn@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 7, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5678 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JUDY ANN LINDER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00189-MP-AK

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Time and for

Reconsideration. (Doc.6). Insofar as Plaintiff requests additional time to comply with the

Court’s previous orders, the motion is GRANTED, and she shall have through July 30, 2010, to

either pay the full filing fee or to re-file for leave to proceed in forma pauperis with inmate

account information for the six months preceding the filing of the complaint (October 1, 2009,

through April 30, 2010). Under the PLRA, all prisoners will eventually pay the district court's

entire $350 filing fee when bringing a civil action, or filing an appeal, in forma pauperis. If a

prisoner's account statement shows that he or she cannot pay even the required initial partial fee,

the civil action may nevertheless proceed; however, the total $350 fee will be assessed and

deducted from future deposits to Plaintiff's prison account until the total filing fee is paid. Thus,

it does not relieve Plaintiff from this requirement if she no longer has the funds or had earmarked

those funds for other matters. If she wishes to file a lawsuit she will be required to pay the filing

fees for this either fully or by installments. This is statutory and will not be waived upon

reconsideration. So, insofar as she seeks this relief, the motion (doc. 6) is DENIED.
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:10-cv-00189-MP-AK

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

1. The Clerk shall mail to Plaintiff the form motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis with consent form which she shall complete and return on or before July 30, 2010, with

the signature of the appropriate prison official and inmate account information for the time set

forth above. 

2. Plaintiff’s motion (doc. 6) is GRANTED IN PART, in that she shall have the

extension of time to submit either the fee or the papers sent to her pursuant to this order, but it is

DENIED in all other respects.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of July, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
# CE2013349EN.01055101.xml

| 29.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 349/551 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 349/551

---

Wednesday 4 July 2012EU-Russia Agreement on the introduction or increase by the Russian Federation of export duties on raw materials ***

P7_TA(2012)0286

European Parliament legislative resolution of 4 July 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Russian Federation relating to the introduction or increase of export duties on raw materials (16827/2011 – C7-0520/2011 – 2011/0332(NLE))

2013/C 349 E/31

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (16827/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (16827/2011),

| — | having regard to the draft Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Russian Federation relating to the introduction or increase of export duties on raw materials (16828/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Russian Federation relating to the introduction or increase of export duties on raw materials (16828/2011),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0520/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0520/2011),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0178/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0178/2012),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Russian Federation. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Russian Federation.

---
# CA2009024DE.01000101.xml

| 30.1.2009 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 24/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2009

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 24/1

---

RESERVELISTE

   (1)

RESERVELISTE

(1

ALLGEMEINES AUSWAHLVERFAHREN EPSO/AD/124/08

ALLGEMEINES AUSWAHLVERFAHREN EPSO/AD/124/08

REFERATSLEITER(IN) (AD 9)

REFERATSLEITER(IN) (AD 9)

deutscher, französischer oder niederländischer Sprache

für das Informationsbüro des Europäischen Parlaments in Brüssel

(2009/C 24 A/01)

Reserveliste in absteigender Reihenfolge:

| 1. | FALTER | Gerolf |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2. | BIESEMANS | Samuel Louis |

1.

FALTER

Gerolf

2.

BIESEMANS

Samuel Louis

Die Reservelisten gelten bis zum 31. Dezember 2010. Ihre Geltungsdauer kann verlängert werden.

31. Dezember 2010

---

(1)  Auf ausdrücklichen Wunsch einer erfolgreichen Teilnehmerin oder eines erfolgreichen Teilnehmers wird ihr bzw. sein Name nicht veröffentlicht.

1

---
# C_2009267EN.01000501.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/5

---

Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 104b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice

2009/C 267/08

At its meeting on 9 October 2009, the Court of Justice of the European Communities designated the Third Chamber of the Court as the Chamber which, in accordance with Article 9(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, is responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 104b of the Rules of Procedure, for a period of one year expiring on 6 October 2010.

---
2013 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-16-2013

In Re: Tarireef White

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 12-3603

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2013

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2013 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Tarireef White " (2013). 2013 Decisions. Paper 984.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2013/984
HLD-001 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-3603

___________

IN RE: TARIREEF WHITE,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the District of Delaware

(Related to D. Del. Crim. No. 07-cr-00123 and Civ. No. 10-cv-00132)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

November 2, 2012

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and BARRY, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: April 16, 2013)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

Petitioner Tarireef White filed a petition for writ of mandamus on September 27, 

2012, asking us to order the District Court to render a decision on his motion to vacate his 

sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

By order entered on March 18, 2013, the District Court dismissed White’s § 2255 

motion and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. Because White has now 

received the relief he requested in his mandamus petition—a decision on his § 2255 
2

motion—we will deny his mandamus petition as moot. See Blanciak v. Allegheny 

Ludlum Corp., 77 F.3d 690, 698-99 (3d Cir. 1996).
| 1.     | Such      quarterly report of Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ending May 31, 2009, fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such quarterly report of Form 10-Q/A for the      quarter ending May 31, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of Pay By The Day      Holdings, Inc. |

| Date: August 6,       2009                                                                                                                                    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                         |
| Pay      By The Day Holdings, Inc.                                                                                                                                           |
|                                                                                                                                                                         |
| /s/      Jordan Starkman                                                                                                                                                     |
| Jordan      StarkmanPresident,      Chief Executive OfficerChairman      of the Board of DirectorsChief      Financial Officer, Controller,Principal      Accounting Officer |
|                                                                                                                                                                         |
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *





I, George Critz, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Shatrusen, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Shatrusen, Inc.


Date: May 12, 2010
By:
/s/ George C. Critz, Jr.Name: George C. Critz, Jr.Title: President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
 
 * The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.