alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



American Capital Agency Corp.

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002



We, Malon Wilkus, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chairman of the Board of Directors, and John R. Erickson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Capital Agency Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ MALON WILKUS                                               
|                      |  |     |  | Malon Wilkus                                                   
|                      |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board, President and    Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|                      |  |    
|Date: August 14, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ JOHN R. ERICKSON                                           
|                      |  |     |  | John R. Erickson                                               
|                      |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer           
|                      | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT EARL ROYSTER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv195/RV/EMT

ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated September 23, 2010 (Doc. 14). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2010.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RENARDO FERGUSON,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv256-MP/WCS

WALTER A. McNEIL, 

Respondent.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO TRANSFER

This cause was initiated by the filing of a $ 5.00 filing fee and a letter; the clerk

filed the letter as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition and assigned a civil case number. See

doc. 4 (order directing amendment). 

Petitioner filed an amended § 2254 petition. Doc. 5. Through no fault of

Petitioner's the amended petition was overlooked and no action was taken by the court

for almost four months. It appears on review, however, that the petition should be

transferred. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at Suwannee Correctional Institution,

and challenges his conviction out of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward

County. Doc. 5, p.1. 
Page 2 of 2

Jurisdiction is appropriate in the Middle and Southern Districts, as the districts of

confinement and conviction, respectively. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). The district of

conviction would appear to be the most convenient and appropriate venue, and the

petition should be transferred to the Middle District of Florida. § 2241(d). See also,

Parker v. Singletary, 974 F.2d 1562, 1581-2 and nn. 114 and 118 (11th Cir. 1992)

(discussing transfer "in furtherance of justice" under § 2241(d), citations omitted); Eagle

v. Linahan, 279 F.3d 926, 933, n. 9 (11th Cir. 2001) (noting that the practice in district

courts in Georgia was to transfer petitions to the district of conviction under § 2241(d)). 

It is therefore respectfully RECOMMENDED that the case file and any service

copies of doc. 5 be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Florida for all further proceedings.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida on December 17, 2010.

 s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES

Within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation, a party may

serve and file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations. A party

may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after being served with a copy thereof. 

Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and

recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv256-MP/WCS
#### STATE v. EASTERLING

No. 480P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 239.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982.
# C_2011323EN.01000901.xml

| 8.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 323/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 323/9

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 323/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 28.9.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 28.9.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SOL/8AB. |
| Species | Common sole (Solea solea) |
| Zone | VIIIa and VIIIb |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 1080664 |

Date and time of closure

28.9.2011

Duration

28.9.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

SOL/8AB.

Species

Common sole (Solea solea)

Solea solea

Zone

VIIIa and VIIIb

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

1080664

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SYLVIA ARDLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00185-MP-AK

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Report and Recommendation, Doc. 13, regarding the

Motion to Remand filed by Michael J. Astrue (“Commissioner”), Doc. 12. The Commissioner 

has moved to remand this matter under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). The Magistrate

Judge recommended the matter be remanded. No party objects to the Report and

Recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. Finding no plain error, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 13, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein. 

2. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence six of 42 U.S.C.

§ 405(g) for further proceedings by the Appeals Council. 

3. The parties shall file a Status Report no later than March 16, 2010, advising the

Court of the status of the administrative proceedings. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of January, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Exhibit
32.01








SECTION
1350 CERTIFICATION





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Rovi Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alfred J. Amoroso
certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted), that to the best of his knowledge:




(a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)), and




(b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.




IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto signed this Certification as of
August 6, 2009.






By:
              /s/ 
      Alfred J. AmorosoAlfred
      J. AmorosoChief
      Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Person to Contact for Information:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-5651 Filed 11-8-07; 3:19 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT EARL ROYSTER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv194/MCR/EMT

ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________________/

ORDER

This cause is before the court on Plaintiff’s Affidavit of Financial Status (Doc. 10), construed

as a supplement to Plaintiff’s pending motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 5). 

Upon review of the motion and supplement, the court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to

provide the requisite supporting documentation, specifically, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis

with a financial certificate with an attached copy of his trust fund account statement covering the

six-month period preceding the filing of the complaint See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). If Plaintiff has

not been incarcerated at his current institution for six months, he must obtain an account statement

from each facility at which he has been confined during the relevant six-moth period. Therefore,

the motion will be denied without prejudice to Plaintiff’s refiling a complete motion with the

required supporting documentation. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 5), as supplemented (Doc. 10), 

is DENIED without prejudice.

2. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a prisoner

consent form and financial certificate approved for use in the Northern District. This case number

should be written on the forms.
Page 2 of 2

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order Plaintiff shall

(1) pay the $350.00 filing fee, or (2) submit a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with

the requisite prisoner consent form and financial certificate, including an attached computer printout

of the transactions in his prison account or accounts during the preceding six-month period.

4. Failure to comply with this order as instructed may result in a recommendation that

this case be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of July 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No.: 3:10cv194/MCR/EMT
EXHIBIT 32.01
 
  CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  I, John Hummel, the President and principal executive and principal financial officer of AIS Futures Management LLC, the General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Annual Report of the Partnership on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
  Date: March 31, 2010
  By:  /s/ John Hummel
 John Hummel
 President (principal executive and principal financial officer)
 AIS Futures Management LLC
 General Partner of AIS Futures Fund IV L.P.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GUELINO AMBROISE,

ALIEN # A075-858-136,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv124-SPM/WCS

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.,

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE 

UNITED STATES, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus

under § 2241 on April 6, 2010. Doc. 1. After review of the petition and finding it

sufficient, I directed service of the petition on May 10, 2010. Doc. 6. Respondents have

now filed a motion to dismiss, doc. 16, asserting the petition is moot because Petitioner

has been released from detention. Doc. 16. The government of Haiti declined to issue

travel documents for Petitioner, and he was released from the custody of Immigration

and Customs Enforcement "on May 3, 2010." Doc. 16, p. 2. Therefore, because
Page 2 of 2

Petitioner has essentially been afforded the relief he sought, this § 2241 petition should

now be dismissed as moot. 

The motion to dismiss, doc. 16, contains a certificate of service which indicates

the document was provided to Petitioner at his "last known address" which was the

Wakulla County Jail. Presumably, that facility will not forward mail to Petitioner since he

has been released, but no forwarding or additional address has been provided for

Petitioner. Petitioner has not filed anything further since the in forma pauperis motion,

doc. 5, on April 30, 2010. It is presumed Petitioner has abandoned this litigation since

he has not filed a change of address. The motion to dismiss should be granted as

Petitioner has received the relief he sought, release from detention.

In light of the uncontested assertion by Respondent, it is respectfully

RECOMMENDED that the § 2241 petition filed by Guelino Ambroise be DISMISSED as

moot.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on June 28, 2010.

 s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after

being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of

review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv124-SPM/WCS
Reduzca su exposición al polvo

Limpie con boquilla de manguera 

pulverizadora y de chorro

¿Sabía usted?

Si comienza la limpieza con un chorro de 

agua fuerte (p. ej., cuando lava equipos, 

paredes, vigas o pisos), puede

aumentar los niveles de exposición 

al polvo

Empiece humedeciendo

todo con un chorro 

amplio de agua 

pulverizada.

Luego, use un 

chorro fuerte de 

agua concentrado

Los hallazgos se basan en estudios de campo de NIOSH

Para obtener más información, visite go.usa.gov/xRkXu
Case 7:07-cv-03224-KMK-GAY Document 18 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 1 of 6Case 7:07-cv-03224-KMK-GAY Document 18 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 2 of 6Case 7:07-cv-03224-KMK-GAY Document 18 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 3 of 6Case 7:07-cv-03224-KMK-GAY Document 18 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 4 of 6Case 7:07-cv-03224-KMK-GAY Document 18 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 5 of 6Case 7:07-cv-03224-KMK-GAY Document 18 Filed 05/21/2008 Page 6 of 6
No. 07-20-00203-CV

In re Caleb Logan Hart, Relator

 

§

§

§

§

Original Proceeding

September 29, 2020

Opinion Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated September 29, 2020, it is ordered, 

adjudged, and decreed that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is conditionally 

granted to the extent that the Honorable Steven R. Emmert rule on Relator’s pending

motions. Writ will issue only if Judge Emmert fails to act in accordance with this Court's 

opinion.

o O o
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2444 

To establish a minimum staffing level of U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

officers along the northern border, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mr. LEAHY, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To establish a minimum staffing level of U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection officers along the northern border, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Border Officers Utili5 zation for National Defense Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘BOUND 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2444 IS

1 SEC. 2. MINIMUM U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION 

2 STAFFING ALONG THE NORTHERN BORDER. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on the date of the en4 actment of this Act, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs 

5 and Border Protection shall ensure that not fewer than 

6 the maximum number of U.S. Customs and Border Pro7 tection officers deployed along the international border be8 tween the United States and Canada (referred to in this 

9 Act as the ‘‘northern border’’) at any time between Janu10 ary 1, 2016 and the date of the enactment of this Act 

11 are always deployed along the northern border, including 

12 ports of entry along the northern border. 

13 (b) LIMITATION ON TRANSFERS.—The Commissioner 

14 of U.S. Customs and Border Protection may not transfer 

15 any U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer away 

16 from an assignment along the northern border if such 

17 transfer would reduce the number of such officers as18 signed to the northern border below the level required 

19 under subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

**SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 13 OF TITLE 18**

**OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18U.S.C.1350)**

ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

** **

** **

In connection with the Annual Report of CanAlaskaUranium Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended April 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harry Chan, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)	the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:	March 21, 2014

 

 

 

***“Harry Chan”		***

Chief Financial Officer
| 1.     | Such      Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008,      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                         |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ended September 30, 2008, fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of League Now Holdings      Corporation. |

| Date:        November 3, 2008 |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
| League      Now Holdings Corporation.   |

| By:    | /s/      James Pregiato                                                        |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | James      Pregiato                                                            |
|   | President,      Chief Executive Officer,Secretary,      Treasurer and Director |
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00084-MP-AK

$18,508.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

DECREE OF FORFEITURE

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 6, Motion for Forfeiture of Property, filed by the

United States of America. On May 7, 2010, a Verified Complaint of Forfeiture In Rem against the

defendant property, $18,508.00 in United States Currency, was filed on behalf of the Plaintiff,

United States of America. The Complaint alleges that the defendant property is forfeitable to the

United States of America pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881 (a)(6).

It appears that process was fully issued in this action according to law:

That a Notice of Forfeiture Action was published on an official government Internet site,

www.forfeiture.gov, for 30 consecutive days beginning May 11, 2010, pursuant to Rule

G(4)(a)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules of Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture

Actions.

That C. Valentine Bates, attorney for potential claimants Dresdin L. Boglin and James Coe,

was notified of the pending forfeiture action by certified mail on June 14, 2010.

That Donald C. Quinn, potential claimant, was notified of the pending forfeiture action by

certified mail on or about June 11, 2010.
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:10-cv-00084-MP-AK

No person or entity has filed a claim.

NOW THEREFORE, on Motion of the Plaintiff, United States of America, for a Decree

of Forfeiture, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Defendant property, $18,508.00 in United States Currency, shall be forfeited to the United States

of America and no right, title or interest in the property shall exist in any other party. The defendant

property shall be disposed of according to law.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of August, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge