alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52012DC0300 - EN

*|*

# 52012DC0300

**DRAFT GENERAL BUDGET OF THE EUROPEAN UNION FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2013 - General introduction - General statement of revenue - General statement of revenue and expenditure by section : - Section 1 : European Parliament - Section 2 : European Council and Council - Section 3 : Commission - Section 4 : Court of Justice of the European Union - Section 5 : Court of Auditors - Section 6 : European Economic and Social Committee - Section 7 : Committee of the Regions - Section 8 : European Ombudsman - Section 9 : European Data Protection Supervisor - Section 10 : European External Action Service /* COM/2012/0300 final */**

			*

			*

DOCUMENTS

Draft General Budget of the European Union for the
financial year 2013

3⁄4 
General introduction

3⁄4 
General statement of
revenue

3⁄4 
General statement of
revenue and expenditure by section:

3⁄4 
Section 1:    European
Parliament

3⁄4 
Section 2:    European
Council and Council

3⁄4 
Section 3:    Commission

3⁄4 
Section 4:    Court of
Justice of the European Union

3⁄4 
Section 5:    Court of
Auditors

3⁄4 
Section 6:    European
Economic and Social Committee

3⁄4 
Section 7:    Committee
of the Regions

3⁄4 
Section 8:    European
Ombudsman

3⁄4 
Section 9:    European
Data Protection Supervisor

3⁄4 
Section 10: European
External Action Service

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/budget/www/index-en.htm
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

TRUST FINANCIAL, A MORTGAGE

COMPANY LLC, a Texas Limited

Liability Company

VS CASE NO. 1:10-cv-49 SPM/GRJ

FORT ATKINSON PLANTATION, LLC,

a Florida Limited Liability Company, et.

al.

JUDGMENT

This action came to trial or hearing before the Court with the Honorable Stephan

P. Mickle presiding. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been

rendered.

Judgment in the amount of $4,039,043.20 is entered in favor of the Plaintiff and

against the Defendants, jointly and severally, and consists of the combined principal

sum in the amount of $3,721,487.77 and accrued prejudgment interest in the amount of

$317,555.43. Post judgment interest shall accrue as provided by law.

 March 8, 2011

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

áB g|TÇÇ fàtÜ~

DATE Deputy Clerk: TiAnn Stark

Case 1:10-cv-00049-SPM-GRJ Document 93 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MANOUCHE SEJOUR et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cv96-SPM/GRJ

STEVEN DAVIS, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for

an Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions Until April 23, 2012 (doc. 125). 

Upon consideration, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The motion (doc. 125) is granted.

2. The deadline for filing dispositive motions is April 23, 2012.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00096-SPM-GRJ Document 126 Filed 04/12/12 Page 1 of 1
#### DAVIS v. MOBILE HOMES

No. 38 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 13.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 1976.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHARLES A. CROSS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-110-RS-CJK

MICHAEL D. CREWS,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Order and Report and Recommendation 

(Doc. 79) and Petitioner’s Objections and Brief (Doc. 80). I have spent considerable time 

reviewing the record and considering Petitioner’s objections de novo. Petitioner 

continues to argue the merits of his claim that he is actually innocent, based mainly on 

alleged perjury by witnesses, ineffective assistance of counsel, and withholding of 

evidence by the State of Florida. The Magistrate Judge found that Petitioner’s claims are

procedurally barred because he failed to exhaust available state court remedies by either 

raising them on direct appeal or through Florida’s post-conviction relief procedures. 

Petitioner contends that “[t]he Magistrate’s ruling that the Plaintiff Charles Cross is some 

how (sic) responsible for the failure to exhaust issues is a far reach.” Doc. 80 at 2. 

However, the circumstances which would excuse exhaustion of state remedies before 

pursuing a federal habeas petition are absent from this case. See, e.g., Hollis v. Davis, 

941 F.2d 1471, 1475 (11th Cir. 1991) (holding that exhaustion of state remedies was 
excused when state courts had not acted on numerous pro se attempts by a nearly 

illiterate defendant to challenge his conviction). Petitioner further contends that if his 

petition is inadequate, he should have been appointed counsel to assist him in the pursuit 

of habeas relief. However, appointment of counsel in civil cases is not a constitutional 

right, but is a privilege justified only by exceptional circumstances. Fowler v. Jones, 899 

F.2d 1088, 1096 (11th Cir. 1990). No exceptional circumstances existed to justify 

appointment of counsel, which was properly denied. Doc. 11. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Order and Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. Petitioners’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

3. Petitioner Charles Cross’ Motion For a Rehearing on his Motion to 

Expand the Record (Doc. 81) is DENIED. 

4. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because Petitioner failed 

to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

5. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on March 13, 2013.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### MANGUM v. SURLES

No. 66 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 547.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 7 December 1971.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

     We hereby consent to the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the
year ended December 31, 2000, for EEX Corporation in accordance with the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  We consent to the
inclusion in such Annual Report of our reserve reports incorporated therein,
references to our name in the form and context in which they appear, and the
incorporation by reference thereof into the company's Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-24595, 333-41979 and 333-81203) and on Form S-3 (No.
333-64427).

                                 NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.


                                 By:  /s/ Frederic D. Sewell
                                      ----------------------
                                      Frederic D. Sewell
                                      President

Dallas, Texas
March 9, 2001
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a) The Form 10-K of the Company for the year-ended December 31, 2009, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |  |  |  |                                                
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |                                                
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 16, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/    WILLIAM L.
HUNTER                       
|                     |  |  |  | William L. Hunter, M.D. Chief Executive Officer

|                     |  |  |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  |                                         
|                     |  | 
|Date: March 16, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/    K. THOMAS
BAILEY                 
|                     |  |  |  | K. Thomas Bailey Chief Financial Officer
Moody National REIT I, Inc. 10-Q


EXHIBIT 31.1




Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to


Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, Brett C. Moody, certify that:





1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Moody National REIT I, Inc.;





2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b) Intentionally omitted;




c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)  that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.









Date: November 15, 2010





/s/ Brett C. MoodyBrett C. MoodyChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMP Holding Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James E. Taylor, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 12, 2011
/s/James E. TaylorJames E. Taylor,Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Oilsands Quest Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended April 30, 2011, the undersigned Garth Wong, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:
  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   July 8, 2011/s/ Garth WongGarth Wong, President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2011117EN.01001901.xml

| 15.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/19

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 117/12

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 28.3.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 28.3.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Stock or Group of stocks | PRA/04-N. |
| Species | Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis) |
| Zone | Norwegian waters south of 62° N |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

28.3.2011

Duration

28.3.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Sweden

Stock or Group of stocks

PRA/04-N.

Species

Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis)

Pandalus borealis

Zone

Norwegian waters south of 62° N

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2009138EN.01001501.xml

| 18.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/15

---

Corrigendum to the call for proposals for indirect actions under the multi-annual Community Programme on protecting children using the Internet and other communication technologies (Safer Internet)

Safer Internet

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 132 of 11 June 2009
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 132 of 11 June 2009

2009/C 138/11

On page 10, footnote 2:

for:

‘Commission Decision C(2009) 4023 of 28.5.2009, http://ec.europa.eu/saferinternet’,

read:

‘Commission Decision C(2009) 4023 of 29.5.2009, http://ec.europa.eu/saferinternet’;

on page 11, the first sentence of paragraph 5:

for:

‘The indicative total budget available for this call under the 2009 budget is 9 333 MEUR of Community contribution.’,

read:

‘The indicative total budget available for this call under the 2009 budget is EUR 9,333 million of Community contribution.’.

---
#### STATE v. MELVIN

No. 241P82.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 421.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 June 1982.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the pubic in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Heart, Lung, and Blood Substitute Special Emphasis Panel; Pathway to Independence Award (K99).                    

*Date:*                         March 9, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Four Points Sheradon BWI Airport Hotel, 7032 Elm Road, Baltimore, MD 21240.                    

*Contact Person:*                         William J. Johnson, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Substitute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7178, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-435-0725,                         *johnsonw@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: February 1, 2007.

Anna Snouffer,

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-559 Filed 2-7-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# C_2009252EN.01000101.xml

| 22.10.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 October 2009

2009/C 252/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4921 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,82 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4434 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90010 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,3155 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5112 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3280 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,879 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,32 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7090 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1780 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2915 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1883 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6175 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5754 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,5639 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,9862 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0833 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 759,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0655 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,1870 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2210 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 067,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0396 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,994 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,5890 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,903 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6193 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,4570 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,3230 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4921

JPY

Japanese yen

135,82

DKK

Danish krone

7,4434

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90010

SEK

Swedish krona

10,3155

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5112

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3280

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,879

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,32

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7090

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1780

RON

Romanian leu

4,2915

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1883

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6175

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5754

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,5639

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,9862

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0833

KRW

South Korean won

1 759,50

ZAR

South African rand

11,0655

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,1870

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2210

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 067,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0396

PHP

Philippine peso

69,994

RUB

Russian rouble

43,5890

THB

Thai baht

49,903

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6193

MXN

Mexican peso

19,4570

INR

Indian rupee

69,3230

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6860

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. PATRICK LAMAR HARRIS, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:94-cr-00297-CWH-6; 4:07-cv-70075-CWH)

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 20, 2009

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patrick Lamar Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince II, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Patrick Lamar Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s order filed in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harris has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CLENNON B. EVERETT,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv42/RS-GRJ

C. HOLLIS, Correctional Officer,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 42). No

objections have been filed. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and

incorporated in this Order.

2. Defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. 35) is granted.

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close the

file.

ORDERED on August 20, 2012.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00042-RS-GRJ Document 44 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 1