alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.5**

 

MODIFICATION TOPROMISSORY NOTE

 

 

WHEREAS,on January 26, 1994, Lee Pharmaceuticals (“Maker”) and Henry L. Lee, Jr.(“Holder”) entered into an agreement (“Note”) whereby Lee Pharmaceuticals wasto pay to Henry L. Lee, Jr. the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars; and

 

WHEREAS,on January 28, 1997, the parties thereto modified said Note to extend thematurity date from January 28, 1997, until January 1, 2005, and theNote had an option to extend the maturity date for an additional five years beyondJanuary 1, 2005.  All other termsand conditions of the Note remained the same.

 

WHEREAS,the parties thereto now desire to further modify said Note and Modification;

 

NOW,THEREFORE, the parties modify said Note and Modification as follows:

 

1.      The maturitydate of the Note is extended from January 1, 2005, until January 1,2010.

 

2.      All otherterms and conditions of the Note remain the same.

 

 

Dated  this  **24th** day  of  **February,  2005**

 

 
| ** ** | **RONALD  G. LEE**            |
|------------|-------------------------------|
|       | Lee Pharmaceuticals           |
|       | By: Ronald G. Lee,  President |
|       |                          |
|       |                          |
| ** ** | **HENRY  L. LEE, JR.**        |
|       | Henry L. Lee, Jr.        |

 

----
# C_2009262EN.01000401.xml

| 4.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 November 2009

2009/C 262/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4658 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,25 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4422 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,89860 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,4635 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5121 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5135 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,279 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 278,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2860 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3015 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2110 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6350 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5834 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,3604 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,0521 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0545 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 734,76 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5629 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 10,0085 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2473 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 137,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0284 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 69,995 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,0487 |
| THB | Thai baht | 49,069 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,5904 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5259 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,4720 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4658

JPY

Japanese yen

132,25

DKK

Danish krone

7,4422

GBP

Pound sterling

0,89860

SEK

Swedish krona

10,4635

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5121

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5135

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,279

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

278,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2860

RON

Romanian leu

4,3015

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2110

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6350

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5834

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,3604

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,0521

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0545

KRW

South Korean won

1 734,76

ZAR

South African rand

11,5629

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

10,0085

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2473

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 137,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0284

PHP

Philippine peso

69,995

RUB

Russian rouble

43,0487

THB

Thai baht

49,069

BRL

Brazilian real

2,5904

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5259

INR

Indian rupee

69,4720

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE**


**SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-Q of the Registrant
      (the “Company”) for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 (the “Report”), I, Douglas
      A. Dyer, the President and the Principal Executive Officer and Principal
      Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      to
      the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:
                August 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ DOUGLAS
              A. DYERDouglas
                A. Dyer
              President
                and Director
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)
# C_2009141EN.01000101.xml

| 20.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/1

---

2009/C 141/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 129, 6.6.2009

OJ C 129, 6.6.2009

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 113, 16.5.2009

OJ C 102, 1.5.2009

OJ C 90, 18.4.2009

OJ C 82, 4.4.2009

OJ C 69, 21.3.2009

OJ C 55, 7.3.2009

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
1... See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4.

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-08-099-CV

CHRISTINA ANN HABALA APPELLANT

V.

MICHAEL STEVEN HABALA APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 324 DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TH

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT 1

------------

On March 13, 2008 and March 26, 2008, we notified appellant, in

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this

appeal unless the $175 filing fee was paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

Appellant has not paid the $175 filing fee. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 12.1(b).
2... See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Aug. 28, 2007)

(listing fees in court of appeals).

2

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2007,

2

we dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.

DELIVERED: April 17, 2008
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Yarraman Winery, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ian Long, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that;





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
        Ian
        Long


Name:  Ian
      Long


Title:  Chief
      Executive Officer


Date:
      October 6 ,
      2008
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BERNARD BELLAMY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2931

[November 14, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Thomas Michael Lynch 

V, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-014382CF10A.

Bernard Bellamy, Live Oak, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DONNIE L. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv238/LAC/EMT

WALTER A. McNEIL, 

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1) and

has paid the filing fee. However, Petitioner provided the court with only one copy of the petition

for service. Petitioner is advised that he must submit a complete copy for each named Respondent

and for the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Therefore, Petitioner must submit one

additional complete copy of the petition.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Petitioner shall

submit one complete copy of the petition with this case number written on the copy.

2. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation of dismissal of this

case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of July 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

T.E. JURKOWICH,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:10cv189/MCR/CJK

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

______________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated April 9, 2012. The petitioner has been furnished a copy of the

report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo

determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for petitioner’s failure to

comply with an order of the Court and failure to keep the Court informed of his current

address.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of May, 2012.

s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00189-MCR-CJK Document 48 Filed 05/10/12 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009050EN.01000502.xml

| 3.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 50/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 50/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5370 — CEZ/Akkok/Sedas/Akenerji)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2009/C 50/03)

On 24 February 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

from the Europa competition web site (http://ec.europa.eu/comm/competition/mergers/cases/). This web site provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5370. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu). |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32009M5370. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to European law (http://eur-lex.europa.eu).

---
Exhibit
99.4








CERTIFICATE
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-QSB of Plata
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the six months ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Presentacion
A. Coranes, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1. The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The
information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





July 22,
2008





PRESENTACION A.
CORANES


Presentacion
A. Coranes


Chief
Accounting Officer


Chief
Financial Officer and Director











-1-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001023298
<NAME> AVENUE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,158,347
<SECURITIES>                                   562,711
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,492
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,139,735
<PP&E>                                         265,115
<DEPRECIATION>                               (162,759)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,139,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,146,858
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,728
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,952,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,139,735
<SALES>                                      2,367,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,367,215
<CGS>                                        1,463,822
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,181,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              46,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,759,635)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   207,816
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,551,819
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,551,819
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, JR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00050-MP-AK

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

Plaintiff, an inmate presently incarcerated in the State of Washington, brings this

“admiralty” complaint alleging that he has been kidnapped and held by pirates and other such

nonsense. (Doc. 1). He also seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2).

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), which was enacted on April 26,

1996, provides that a prisoner may not bring a civil action in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. §

1915:

if the prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any

facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was

dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger

of serious physical injury.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

Plaintiff has had more than three prior prisoner actions dismissed on the grounds that

they were frivolous, malicious, or failed to state a claim. Plaintiff has also been advised that this

Court considers him a “three striker,” and that he must allege imminent danger or pay the full

filing fee. See Doc. 3 in Case No. 4:08cv233-SPM/WCS; Doc. 3 in Case No. 4:00cv370. In the
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:10-cv-00050-MP-AK

Report and Recommendations entered in both these previous cases, the Court took judicial notice

of and listed 26 cases filed by this Plaintiff that had been dismissed as frivolous. 

The instant complaint is not filed on the proper forms and is frivolous on its face. There

are no allegations that would bring him within the "imminent danger" exception. 

Because Plaintiff has had at least three prior dismissals and is not under imminent danger

of serious physical injury, his request to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied and this

action should be dismissed. The dismissal should be without prejudice to him making the same

allegations in a complaint for which he pays the full $350.00 filing fee at the time of filing the

complaint.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. That Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 2) is DENIED.

2. That the complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of April, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Civil No. 5:09cv301-RS/EMT

REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT

3600 SW 19 AVE., UNIT 12, TH

GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA, WITH

ALL IMPROVEMENTS AND 

APPURTENANCES THEREON

 /

DECREE OF FORFEITURE

Before me is the Government’s Motion for Decree of Forfeiture (Doc. 15 ). Ifind as follows:

1. On September 3, 2009, a Verified Complaint of Forfeiture In Rem against the

defendant property, 3600 SW 19 Avenue, Unit 12, Gainesville, Florida, with all improvements and th

appurtenances thereon, was filed on behalf of the United States of America. The Complaint alleges

that the defendant property is forfeitable to the United States of America pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §

981(a)(1).

2. That a Notice of Forfeiture Action was published on an official government Internet

site, www.forfeiture.gov, for 30 consecutive days beginning October 22, 2009 pursuant to Rule G

(a)(4)(iv)(C) of the Supplemental Rules of Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture

Actions.

3. The facts set out in the Declaration (Doc. 15-1) filed bythe United States demonstrate

sufficient grounds for forfeiture of the real property.
IT IS ORDERED:

1. The right, title, and interest to the property located at 3600 SW 19 Avenue, Unit 12, th

Gainesville, Florida, more specifically described as:

Unit No. 12-A, Foxmoor Condominium, according to the Declaration of Condominium

thereof, as recorded in Official Records Book 1558, Page 40, Public Records of Alachua

County, Florida,

with all improvements and appurtenances thereon, is condemned, forfeited, and vested in the United

States of America, and no right, title, or interest in the property shall exist in any other party.

2. The defendant property shall be disposed of according to the law.

ORDERED on June 14, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Genesis Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
T. Brooke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      Robert T. BrookeRobert
      T. BrookeChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)November
      16, 2010
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 20
- 00392
- CV

Jose Orlando Diaz, Appellant

v. Texas Board of Nursing, Appellee

FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- GN
- 20
- 002488, THE HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDIN G

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on September 25,
2020

. On September 29, 2020, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due to
his failur e to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report regarding this appeal by October 9, 2020 . Further, the no ti ce advised appellant
that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record h as not been filed.

If a trial

- court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may dism iss the appeal for want of prosecution u nless the appellant was entitled to proceed2

without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established
that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs

. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145 . Because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________ Darl ene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker a nd Smith
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: February 3, 202 1