alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSE LUIS ORTIZ,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:10cv54/RS/CJK

FEDERAL PRISONS CAMP, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

Plaintiff having failed to comply with the court’s November 23, 2010 order

(doc. 10; see also docs. 14 and16), it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

1. That this case be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s

failure to comply with an order of the court.

2. That the clerk be directed to close the file.

At Pensacola, Florida this 25th day of May, 2011.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00054-RS-CJK Document 17 Filed 05/25/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court's internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Case No: 5:10cv54/RS/CJK

Case 5:10-cv-00054-RS-CJK Document 17 Filed 05/25/11 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9-8 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9-8 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03525-PKL Document 9-8 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

FRED PROCTOR,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv149-RS/MD

COUNTRYWIDE FINANCIAL,

a Delaware corporation; COUNTRYWIDE HOME

LOANS, INC., a New York corporation;

BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, a 

Texas Limited Partnership; LARRY WRIGHT,

Individually; WRIGHT & ASSOCIATES OF

NORTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. a Florida corporation;

CHRISTOPHER LEE PEAVY, Individually; JAMES

A. PEAVY, JR., Individually; ANDREW PICKEL,

Individually; and PEAVY AND ASSOCIATES, Inc.,

a Florida corporation,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 67). 

The scheduling and mediation order provides that the deadline for filing 

dispositive motions is fourteen days after the discovery deadline. (Doc. 37). The 

discovery deadline was originally October 21, 2010. (Doc. 37). On October 20, 

2010, I extended the discovery deadline until November 19, 2010, (Doc. 59) 

making the dispositive motions due December 3, 2010. Defendants’ motion was 
filed on December 30, 2010, twenty-seven days late. On November 29, 2010, I 

extended the discovery deadline until December 10, 2010, but clearly stated that no 

other deadlines were extended. (Doc. 61)1. 

Defendants have failed to show good cause for the late filing of this motion. 

In addition, this late filing makes Plaintiff’s response due a mere six days before 

trial, which would unfairly cut into Plaintiff’s trial preparation time. Therefore, 

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 67) is denied as untimely.

ORDERED on January 11, 2011.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

1 Even if the dispositive motions deadline had also been extended with this order, the deadline would have been 

December 27, 2010, and Defendants’ motion would still be untimely.
---

Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantic Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   March 11, 2009





/s/ Raffi Khorchidian---------------------------------
Raffi Khorchidian, 
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)









---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TIMOTHY CLIFTON,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-154/RS/CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security, 

Defendant. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21). No 

objections have been filed. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order. 

2. The decision of the Commissioner is reversed, and this action is remanded to 

the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate 

Judge’s Report and Recommendation. 

ORDERED on September 27, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00154-RS-CJK Document 22 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

 Announcement of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 21st meeting of the American Health Information Community Consumer Empowerment Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.)

# DATES:

December 5, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. [Eastern].

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090. Please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​consumer/​.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Workgroup will continue its discussion on how to encourage the widespread adoption of a personal health record that is easy-to-use, portable, longitudinal, affordable, and consumer-centered.

                    The meeting will be available via Web cast. For additional information, go to:                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​consumer/​ce_​instruct.html.*

Dated: November 2, 2007.

Judith Sparrow,

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

[FR Doc. 07-5641  Filed 11-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 221 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Under Secretary 

of Health to report major adverse personnel actions involving certain 

health care employees to the National Practitioner Data Bank and to 

applicable State licensing boards, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2019 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. MORAN, Ms. COLLINS, and 

Mr. CASSIDY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to require the Under 

Secretary of Health to report major adverse personnel 

actions involving certain health care employees to the 

National Practitioner Data Bank and to applicable State 

licensing boards, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Department of Vet5 erans Affairs Provider Accountability Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 221 IS

1 SEC. 2. ACCOUNTABILITY WITHIN VETERANS HEALTH AD2 MINISTRATION. 

3 (a) REPORTING MAJOR ADVERSE ACTIONS TO NA4 TIONAL PRACTITIONER DATA BANK AND STATE LICENS5 ING BOARDS.—Section 7461 of title 38, United States 

6 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

7 subsection: 

8 ‘‘(f) Whenever the Under Secretary for Health (or an 

9 official designated by the Under Secretary) brings charges 

10 based on conduct or performance against a section 

11 7401(1) employee and as a result of those charges a major 

12 adverse action is taken against the employee, the Under 

13 Secretary shall, not later than 30 days after the date on 

14 which such major adverse action is carried out, transmit 

15 to the National Practitioner Data Bank and the applicable 

16 State licensing board the name of the employee, a descrip17 tion of the major adverse action, and a description of the 

18 reason for the major adverse action.’’. 

19 (b) PROHIBITION ON SIGNING SETTLEMENTS WITH

20 CERTAIN CLAUSES.— 

21 (1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para22 graph (2), the Secretary of Veterans Affairs may not 

23 enter into a settlement agreement relating to a claim 

24 by an employee of the Department of Veterans Af25 fairs under which the Department would be required 

26 to conceal a serious medical error or purge a negaVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:03 Feb 01, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S221.IS S221

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 221 IS

1 tive record from a personnel file of an employee of 

2 the Department. 

3 (2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not 

4 apply to a negative record if the head of the Office 

5 of Accountability and Whistleblower Protection of 

6 the Department and the Special Counsel (established 

7 by section 1211 of title 5, United States Code) joint8 ly certify that the negative record is not legitimate. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6502

ANTHONY PATTERSON, JR. , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ARTHUR R. HOLLAND; REBECCA A. REID; RUTH A. BROWN; TRACEY E. CLINE; ROBIN PENDERGRAFT; JED TAUB; JOHN G. BRITT, JR.; MICHAEL GLENN HOWELL , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:20

- cv - 00931

- CCE

- LPA )

Submitted : September 14, 2021 Decided: September 20, 2021

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Anthony Patterson, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Patterson, Jr. , appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil action

. * The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge recommended that the action be dismissed
and advised Patterson that failure to file timely and specific objections to this
recommendat ion could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the
recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation wh en the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Martin v

. Duffy , 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017); Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 846

- 47 (4th Cir. 1985);
see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140, 154

- 55 (1985). Patterson has waived a ppellate review by failing to file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

a dequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* Although the district court dismissed Patterson’s action without prejudice, we conclude after review of the record in light of Bing v. Brivo Sys., LLC , 959 F.3d 605, 610

- 12, 614

- 15 (4th Cir. 2020), that the dismissal is final and appealable.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:01cr53-01/RV

COY LEE COLEMAN, JR.

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on April 5, 2006 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION to serve balance of sentence on home confinement 

Filed by Defendant on 3/29/2006 Doc.# 63

RESPONSES:

 on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 6th day of

April , 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

/s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:01-cr-00053-RV Document 64 Filed 04/06/06 Page 1 of 1
# C_2009181EN.01000501.xml

| 4.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 181/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 181/5

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

1,00 % on 1 August 2009

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 August 2009

2009/C 181/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4303 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4449 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84920 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2983 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5246 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6800 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,695 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 265,70 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7023 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1088 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2030 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,0956 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7020 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5274 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 11,0849 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1445 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0513 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 745,63 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,0823 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,7701 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,3560 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 163,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 5,0168 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 68,742 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,4465 |
| THB | Thai baht | 48,652 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,6482 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7627 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,0680 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4303

JPY

Japanese yen

135,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4449

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84920

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2983

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5246

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6800

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,695

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

265,70

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7023

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1088

RON

Romanian leu

4,2030

TRY

Turkish lira

2,0956

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7020

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5274

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

11,0849

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1445

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0513

KRW

South Korean won

1 745,63

ZAR

South African rand

11,0823

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,7701

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,3560

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 163,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

5,0168

PHP

Philippine peso

68,742

RUB

Russian rouble

44,4465

THB

Thai baht

48,652

BRL

Brazilian real

2,6482

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7627

INR

Indian rupee

68,0680

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JIMMY EARL DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00029-MP-AK

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, et al,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to Pay Partial

Filing Fee. (Doc. 10). Having considered said motion, the Court is of the opinion that it should

be GRANTED, and Plaintiff shall have through April 23, 2010, to pay the initial filing fee

assessed by previous Order. (See Doc. 7). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of April, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
                  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
                  United States Code), the undersigned officer of Vycor Medical, Inc.,
                  a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that: 1.The amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
                     31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the
                     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                     of 1934, and 2.The information contained in the amended Form 10-Q fairly presents,
                     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                     operations of the Company.
 Date: September 2, 2011  /s/ Kenneth T. CovielloKenneth T. CovielloPrincipal Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
                     has been provided to VYCOR MEDICAL, INC. and will be retained by
                     VYCOR MEDICAL, INC. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
                     Commission or its staff upon request.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

BRICE BUILDING COMPANY,

INC.

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv31/RS-MD

SUANN LEE and

GLENDA LEE,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Defendant Suann Lee’s motion for sanctions (Doc. 11) is granted. 

Sanctions are proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 when a party files a pleading 

that (1) has no reasonable factual basis, (2) is based on a legal theory that has no 

reasonable chance of success and that cannot be advanced as a reasonable 

argument to change existing law; or (3) when the party files a pleading in bad faith 

for an improper purposes. Worldwide Primates, Inc. v. McGreal, 87 F.3d 1252, 

1254 (11th Cir. 1996). Sanctions are appropriate pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 57.105(1) 

when an attorney knew or should have known that a claim (1) was not supported 

by the material facts necessary to establish the claim or defense; or (2) would not 

be supported by the application of then existing law to those material facts.
2

Plaintiff has failed to cite any appellate authority that would allow him to 

prevail on a claim against the Defendants in this case. Defendants are the wives of

the two principals of Landmark General Contractors, and agreed to personally

indemnify Arch Insurance Company for a bond issued for Landmark for the

Harbour Village Project. Plaintiff was part of a joint venture with Landmark as

general contractors of the Harbour Village project, but Plaintiff has no privity with 

the Defendants. Defendants made a commitment only to indemnify the bonding

company for a performance bond—a contract made for the benefit of the owner of 

the building project, not Plaintiff. Furthermore, Plaintiff has provided no appellate 

authority that unjust enrichment can extend to what are essentially strangers, nor 

has Plaintiff provided authority for holding Defendants liable for Plaintiff’s 

contractual responsibility of completing a project that cost more than Plaintiff had

anticipated. 

The only plausible explanation for proceeding against Defendants appears to 

be that their husbands may be “judgment-proof” because their assets are held 

jointly or in the entirety with their wives, but this is not a proper purpose for a 

lawsuit. Thus, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c) and Fla. Stat. § 57.105(1), 

sanctions against Plaintiff are appropriate. 
3

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant Suann Lee is awarded attorneys fees and costs from

Plaintiff.

2. The parties shall proceed pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 54.1(E) to 

determine the amount of fees.

ORDERED on May 7, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2011359EN.01000301.xml

| 9.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/3

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I to the Treaty)

2011/C 359/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 29.6.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.32638 (11/N) |
| Member State | France |
| Region | Réunion | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Aides à la structuration de la filière pêche réunionnaise |
| Legal basis | — | Décret no 2009-340 du 27 mars 2009 relatif à l’Agence de services et de paiement, à l’Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) et à l’Office de développement de l’économie agricole d’outre-mer (articles L 621-1 et suivants du code rural nouveau) |

Date of adoption of the decision

29.6.2011

Reference number of State Aid

SA.32638 (11/N)

Member State

France

Region

Réunion

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Aides à la structuration de la filière pêche réunionnaise

Legal basis

—

Décret no 2009-340 du 27 mars 2009 relatif à l’Agence de services et de paiement, à l’Établissement national des produits de l’agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer) et à l’Office de développement de l’économie agricole d’outre-mer (articles L 621-1 et suivants du code rural nouveau)

o

| — | Projet de décision du directeur général de FranceAgriMer, approuvé par le conseil d’administration, base juridique aux décisions de financement |
| --- | --- |

—

Projet de décision du directeur général de FranceAgriMer, approuvé par le conseil d’administration, base juridique aux décisions de financement

Type of measure

Scheme

—

Objective

Outermost regions and the Aegean Islands

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

| | Overall budget: EUR 9,34 million |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 9,34 million

| | Annual budget: EUR 1,87 million |
| --- | --- |

Annual budget: EUR 1,87 million

Intensity

100 %

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2015

Economic sectors

Fishing

Name and address of the granting authority

| Mme Françoise SIMON chef du secteur AGRAP au SGAE |
| --- |
| FranceAgriMer |
| 12 rue Henri Rol Tanguy |
| 93555 Montreuil sous Bois |
| FRANCE |

Mme Françoise SIMON chef du secteur AGRAP au SGAE

FranceAgriMer

12 rue Henri Rol Tanguy

93555 Montreuil sous Bois

FRANCE

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---