alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4





Form 52-109F1 Certification of Annual Filings



I, Gordon Steblin, CFO of CanAlaska Ventures Ltd. certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the annual filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim Filings) of CanAlaska Ventures Ltd. (the issuer) for the period ending April 30, 2006;



2.

Based on my knowledge, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the annual filings;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented in the annual filings;



4.

The issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the issuer, and we have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused them to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which the annual filings are being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the annual filings and have caused the issuer to disclose in the annual MD&A our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the annual filings based on such evaluation.





Date: August 25, 2006



Gordon Steblin

Gordon Steblin

CFO
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Christine M. Applegate, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Porfavor, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  December 3, 2009    By: /s/ Christine M. Applegate Christine M. Applegate CFO, Controller, Treasurer, Secretary, Director
EX-10.18





 Exhibit 10.18 

SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 

Independent non-employee directors of Mastech Digital, Inc. (the “Company”) will receive an
annual retainer fee of $48,000 in 2020, other than the Chair of the Audit Committee who will receive an annual retainer fee of $52,000 in 2020. In addition, independent non-employee directors of the
Company are eligible to participate in the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Stock Incentive Plan”). On January 30, 2020, our independent non-employee directors each
received a restricted share grant under the Stock Incentive Plan of 3,825 restricted shares, which shares vest over a three-year period. 
 Non-independent directors of the Company will not receive any compensation for their service as directors of the Company. 

All of the Company’s directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel expenses incurred in connection with attending Board of Directors and
committee meetings.
Exhibit 99.4
 
 
 CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-Q of Plata Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Presentacion A. Coranes, Chief Accounting Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
Director, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 Dated: November 9, 2009
 
 PRESENTACTION A. CORANES
 Presentacion A. Coranes
 Chief Accounting Officer
 Chief Financial Officer and Director
 
 
 
 -1-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSHUA S. FRIEBEL and ELIZABETH

F. FRIEBEL,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv120/RS-MD

PARADISE SHORES OF BAY COUNTY,

LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company;

ROBERT E. BLACKERBY; and MAGNUM

CAPITAL, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability

Company,

Defendants

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiffs’ Notice of Bankruptcy FilingAnd Motion To Enforce Automatic

Stay (Doc. 358). 

The automatic stay prohibits “the commencement or continuation...of a judicial,

administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor.” 11 U.S.C. §362(a)

(emphasis added). It is clear that the stay applies to Defendants’ Motion To Enforce

Settlement Agreement (Doc. 333). What is unclear is whether it applies to the underlying

cause of action—where the debtors are the Plaintiffs, and they are pursuing that claim

against Defendants. The automatic stay analysis is complicated because an adverse

ruling in the underlying case could subject the Plaintiffs to liability for costs.

The role of the bankruptcy trustee must also be considered. The Bankruptcy Code

charges the trustee with collecting and reducing the property of the estate to money. 11

U.S.C. §704(a). Plaintiffs’ claim against the remaining Defendants is property of the

Case 5:10-cv-00120-RS-CJK Document 359 Filed 09/01/11 Page 1 of 2
estate. See id. §541(a)(1); Barger v. City of Cartersville, 348 F.3d 1289, 1292 (11 Cir. Ga. th

2003) (“property of bankruptcy estate includes all potential causes of action that exist at

the time petitioner files for bankruptcy”). Furthermore, a decision may be required about

who is the proper party to see this case to its end—the trustee or the Friebels. See Fed.

R. Civ. P. 25(c). In light of what has transpired in this case with the unusual obligation of

the Plaintiffs to pay certain Defendants in conjunction with their dismissal, the proper

plaintiff might elect to continue the case by filing the proposed findings of fact or to dismiss

the case altogether.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Consideration of the Motion To Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 333)

is stayed pending resolution of the bankruptcy case.

2. The parties shall file written memoranda not later than September 15, 2011,

addressing whether the automatic stay applies to Plaintiffs’ cause of action

in this case and who is the proper party to pursue that claim.

ORDERED on September 1, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00120-RS-CJK Document 359 Filed 09/01/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit (10)(a)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
 We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional Information and to the
use of our report dated April 22, 2009, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, included in Pre-Effective Amendment No. 9 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4
No. 333-142762) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Prospectus of Flexible Premium Variable Annuity – K, issued through Separate Account VA Z of Transamerica Life Insurance Company. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines,
Iowa 
 August 27, 2009
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION





EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications



I am the Chief Executive Officer of Your Event,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2012, and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-Q’).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Your Event, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies
to his knowledge that:





|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                               





|/s/ Masaya Konishi         
|---------------------------
|Masaya Konishi             
|Principal Executive Officer
|                           
|July 16, 2012              
|Date
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Christine M. Applegate, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Porfavor, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  August 17, 2009    By: /s/ Christine M. Applegate Christine M. Applegate CFO, Controller, Treasurer, Secretary, Director
Form 52-109FT1  Certification of Annual Filings during Transition Period









I, Peter Dasler, CEO of CanAlaska Ventures Ltd certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the annual filings (as this term is defined in Multilateral Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuers Annual and Interim Filings) of CanAlaska Ventures Ltd for the period ending April 30, 2004;



2.

Based on my knowledge, the annual filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, with respect to the period covered by the annual filings; and



3.

Based on my knowledge, the annual financial statements together with the other financial information included in the annual filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date and for the periods presented in the annual filings.





DATED:

August 25, 2004















Per:

Peter Dasler









Peter Dasler



Chief Executive Officer









#
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 27, 2018

p0620

Order 

Clerk

June 27, 2018

156711

STAN MICIURA,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant- Appellee,

v SC: 156711

COA: 338945

Wayne CC: 17-000217-AV

STACY KURC, JOHN KURC, and

1410 SYCAMORE, WYANDOTTE, MI

48192, LLC,

Defendants/Counterplaintiffs- Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2017 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### M. J. Jones, plaintiff in error, *vs.*A. C. McGehee *et al.,*defendants in error.

By two judges. — When a *fi. fa.*founded on a debt due before June, 1865, was about to proceed to levy, and the plaintiff, in lieu of the affidavit required by the 5th section of the Act of October, 1870, filed an affidavit that the judgment, which was in his own name, as well as the debt on which it was founded, belonged, in fact, to one who was a minor, and who continued a minor until the spring of 1870, and the levy being made, the Judge of the Superior Court, on motion, dismissed the same:

*Held,*That the affidavit did not show that the note belonged to one who was a minor at the date of the Act, and that there was no error in dismissing the levy. 5th March, 1872.

Taxes. Relief Act of 1870. Minors. Before Judge Johnson. Muscogee Superior Court. May Term, 1871.

In July 1870 a *fi. fa.*was issued in favor of M. J. Jones, upon a judgment obtained in 1870 against McGehee *et al.*On the 20th of October, 1870, Jones made an affidavit that said *fi. fa.*belonged to his ward, Ella S. Jones, and was founded upon a note bought by him as such guardian in 1860, and said note was ever since held by him as such guardian, and that Ella was a minor till the spring of 1870. This affidavit was attached to the *fi. fa.,*and it was then levied upon defendant’s property. They filed no counter-affidavit. A motion was pending in said Court to set-off certain losses of defendants against this judgment under the Relief Act. When it was called, though Jones was ready to prove the facts stated in his affidavit, upon motion of defendant’s counsel, the Court dismissed tire levy because Jones had filed no affidavit of having paid all taxes due on said debt as required by the Relief Act of 13th October, 1870. This is assigned as error.

Peabody & Brannon, for plaintiff in error.

Blanford & Thornton; J. M. Russell, for defendants.

*22McCay, Judge.

It would be stretching the fourteenth section of the Act of October 13th, 1870, very far, to say that by widows or minors was meant any who had at any time been widows or minors. It is giving the Act perhaps a fair construction to say that by widows and minors it means such as were widows or minors at the date of the Act. This is going as far as we feel inclined to do.

Under this rule, the judgment must be affirmed, since the proof shows that the equitable owner was not a minor at the date of the Act.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Eagle Broadband, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard R. Royall,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d),
as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  October 11, 2004


/s/ Richard R. Royall
Richard R. Royall,
Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANTHONY SIKORA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv164-SPM/WCS

LEON COUNTY JAIL, et al.

Defendants.

________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation. Doc. 6. Plaintiff has been furnished a copy and has filed

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Doc. 7. 

Despite the objections, I have determined that the report and recommendation is

correct and should be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 6) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

3. The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket that this case was
Page 2 of 2

dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of May, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO. 4:10cv164-SPM/WCS
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2473 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2473

 To extend certain provisions of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 
         Act until September 30, 2030, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 12, 2019

    Mr. Isakson (for himself, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Jones) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend certain provisions of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 
         Act until September 30, 2030, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Extension of the Caribbean Basin 
Economic Recovery Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF THE CARIBBEAN BASIN ECONOMIC RECOVERY ACT.

    Section 213(b) of the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery Act (19 
U.S.C. 2703(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(A)--
                    (A) in clause (iii)--
                            (i) in subclause (II)(cc), by striking 
                        ``September 30, 2020'' and inserting 
                        ``September 30, 2030''; and
                            (ii) in subclause (IV)(dd), by striking 
                        ``September 30, 2020'' and inserting 
                        ``September 30, 2030''; and
                    (B) in clause (iv)(II), by striking ``18'' and 
                inserting ``28''; and
            (2) in paragraph (5)(D)(i), by striking ``September 30, 
        2020'' and inserting ``September 30, 2030''.
                                 <all>
```