alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
. -

Hon. Oscar B.McInnis

Criminal District Attorney Hidalgo County Edinburg, Texas DearMr. Mclnnis: Opinion No. M-1118 Re: Filing deadline for candidate for office of trustee of Independent School District.

Inyour recent letter, supplemented by phone, you have requested anopinion of this department as to the filing deadline for candidates for the office of trustee of an Independent School District. Chapter 23of theTexas Education Code governs independent school districts. Section 23.03, Subsection (a)governs the filing deadline forplaces on theballot. That subsection reads as follows:

"(a) Applications of candidates for a place on theballot shall be filed not less than 30days prior to the day of the election, and no candidate shall have his name printed on saidballot unless there has been compliance with theprovisions of this section." Under the quoted language, the deadline ismidnight of the 31stday preceding the election, not counting the day of the election. The sameholding was reached inAttorney General's Opinion No. WW-1371 (1962)construing language inArticle 2745c, Vernon's Civil Statutes. That statute, now repealed, included in its relevant part language identical to that in Section 23.03, Subsection (a)of the Texas Education Code.

Opinion No. WW-1371 also includes the following statement: "Statutory provisions fixing the time for the filing of applications aremandatory. The general rule is that an instrument isnot 'filed' until it isdelivered to the proper officer. See Attorney General's Opinion WW-75, citing Burroughs v. Lyles, 142Tex. 704, 181 S.W.Zd 570 (1944)and McWaters v. Tucker, 249 S.W.Zd 80 (Civ.App. 19521." -5447-Ron. Oscar B.McInnis, page 2 (M-1118)

You have pointed out thatArticle 4.10, Section 2of the Election Code of the State of Texas reads, inpart, as follows:

"Sec. 2. Such application must be filed not later than 6p.m. of the 31stday before any such special election, and shall not be considered filed unless ithas actually been received by the officer with whom it is tobe filed.
. . ." You inquire whether this 6p.m. deadline applies to election of trustees for an independent school district.

This Article 4.10 does not apply to the election of trustees of an independent school district. The election of school board trustees isgoverned by relevant provisions of theTexas Education Code, enacted by the Legislature for the express purpose of governing schools of the State. SUMMARY The filing deadline for candidates for the office of trustee of an Independent School District ismidnight of the 31stday preceding the election, not counting the dv of the election. truly yours,

eyGeneral of Texas " Prepared by James S. Swearingen Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E.Allen, Co-Chairman Roland Allen Bill Campbell James McCoy John Banks

-5448-- - _ .

Hon. Oscar B.McInnis, page 3 (M-1118)

SAMUEL D.MCDANIEL Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant

-5449-
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANTHONY SIKORA,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv147-SPM/WCS

SGT. PARAMORE,

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

In an order entered May 26, 2010, Plaintiff was directed to submit a service copy

of his second amended complaint by June 30, 2010. Plaintiff was specifically warned

that a recommendation would be made that this case be dismissed if there was a failure

to comply with that order. Doc. 12. To date, no response has been received from the

Plaintiff.

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.
Page 2 of 2

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, this complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

Plaintiff shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by filing a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on July 29, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv147-SPM/WCS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ROMELDINE PIERRE and

MAX ETIENNE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cv96-SPM/GRJ

STEVEN DAVIS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to the Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Claims Without Prejudice of

Plaintiffs Romeldine Pierre and Max Etienne and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 41(a)(2) (doc. 132), the claims of Romeldine Pierre and Max Etienne

are hereby dismissed without prejudice. The parties shall bear their own costs

and fees.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of April, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00096-SPM-GRJ Document 137 Filed 04/30/12 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 PENSACOLA DIVISION

KELVIN FRAZIER,

 Plaintiff,

vs. 3:09cv367/RV/MD

WALTER McNEIL et al.

 Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff in this cause has filed a pleading entitled “Administrative Complaint”

with a caption indicating that it was to be filed in the Florida Department of

Corrections. Although plaintiff complains of the conditions of his confinement

within the prison system, which under some circumstances could give rise to a

claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, clearly the document was filed with this court in error. 

No in forma pauperis application was filed, and the jurisdictional statement on the

first page cites § 112.533(1), Florida Statutes. Additionally, court records reflect that

plaintiff has filed enough other federal cases that he would surely be aware of

procedural requirements including the use of the proper civil rights form for § 1983

cases. (See Case 3:03cv8/RH/MCR and cases cited therein; 3:06cv347/LAC/EMT;

3:07cv273/LAC/MD, 3:08cv398/LAC/MD).

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this cause be dismissed without prejudice so that plaintiff may pursue

it in the proper forum. 
Page 2 of 2

At Pensacola, Florida, this 31 day of August, 2009. st

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within ten days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object

may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636;

United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Case No: 3:09cv367/RV/MD
Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC     Document 12      Filed 06/14/2007     Page 1 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC     Document 12      Filed 06/14/2007     Page 2 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC     Document 12      Filed 06/14/2007     Page 3 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC     Document 12      Filed 06/14/2007     Page 4 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC     Document 12      Filed 06/14/2007     Page 5 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC     Document 12      Filed 06/14/2007     Page 6 of 7

Case 1:07-cv-03383-PAC     Document 12      Filed 06/14/2007     Page 7 of 7
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MICHAEL JAMES SPILLMAN,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 1:10CV0037-SPM/AK

ALACHUA COUNTY JAIL,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Letter Motion to Extend Time to

supplement his motion to proceed in forma pauperis by filing his Prisoner Consent Form and

Financial Certificate, (Docs. 10, 8). Having considered said motion, the Court is of the opinion

that the motion, (Doc. 10), should be GRANTED, and review of Plaintiff’s complaint (Doc. 1),

and ruling on his motion to proceed in forma pauperis, (Doc. 8), is deferred until Plaintiff has

complied with 28 U.S.C. §1915.

The clerk of court shall forward to Plaintiff a Prisoner Consent Form and Financial

Certificate. Thus, Plaintiff must submit a computer printout for his inmate bank account for the

six (6) month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint; i.e., the period from

SEPTEMBER 15, 2009 to MARCH 15, 2010. Plaintiff must obtain account statements with

the signature from the appropriate official of each jail or prison at which he is, or has been,

confined for the six (6) month period prior to the filing of this complaint. The filing of the
Page 2 of 2

prisoner consent form and financial certificate must include the inmate account information and

the signature of an authorized official. If Plaintiff was not incarcerated during any portion of this

time period, he must specifically advise the court. 

Plaintiff shall have until JUNE 11, 2010, to either: (1) file a computer printout for the

time period specified above of the transactions in his prison account as directed in this order

along with a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis certified by the appropriate

prison official, or (2) pay the full $350.00 filing fee, or (3) file a notice of voluntary dismissal of

this case pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a).

 Failure to respond to this order as instructed may result in dismissal of this action for

failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an order of this court. 

The clerk shall refer the file to the undersigned on or before JUNE 11, 2010.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of May, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

No. 1:10cv0037-spm/ak
Exhibit 31(a)



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Alonzo Pierce, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A
of Emperial Americas, Inc.; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2.	            Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                    |    
|------------------- | ---
|Date: June 20, 2012 | By:
|                    |
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2504 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to furnish hyperbaric oxygen therapy to veterans with traumatic 

brain injury or post-traumatic stress disorder. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2019 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to furnish hyperbaric oxygen 

therapy to veterans with traumatic brain injury or posttraumatic stress disorder. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TBI and PTSD Treat5 ment Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2504 IS

1 SEC. 2. HYPERBARIC OXYGEN THERAPY FOR VETERANS 

2 WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY OR POST3 TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 17 of 

5 title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 

6 section 1710E the following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 1710F. Traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic 

8 stress disorder: hyperbaric oxygen ther9 apy 

10 ‘‘(a) AUTHORITY.—The Secretary shall furnish 

11 hyperbaric oxygen therapy to a veteran who has a condi12 tion specified in subsection (b) through a health care pro13 vider described in section 1703(c)(5) of this title. 

14 ‘‘(b) COVERED CONDITIONS.—The conditions speci15 fied in this subsection are the following: 

16 ‘‘(1) Traumatic brain injury. 

17 ‘‘(2) Post-traumatic stress disorder.’’. 

18 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

19 at the beginning of subchapter II of chapter 17 of such 

20 title is amended by inserting after the item relating to sec21 tion 1710E the following new item: 

‘‘1710F. Traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder: hyperbaric 

oxygen therapy.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Case 1:10-cv-00092-MP-AK Document 5 Filed 05/21/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:10-cv-00092-MP-AK Document 5 Filed 05/21/10 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. SUTTON

No. 341 PC.

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 281

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 31 August 1981.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

         As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our reports dated March 20, 2001 on the
consolidated balance sheet of eChapman as of December 31, 2000 and the
consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2000 and the period from May 14, 1999 (inception) to December
31, 2000 into the company's S-8. It should be noted that we have not audited
any financial statements of the company subsequent to December 31, 2000 or
performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Baltimore, Maryland
April 3, 2001
Case 1:07-cv-03578-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03578-PKC Document 5 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
----

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |   |                                                       |   |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: April 14, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Rodger D. Spainhower, Sr.                         |   |
|                      |   | Name: Rodger D. Spainhower, Sr.                            |   |
|                      |   | Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                      |   |                                                       |   |
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00334-CV

ESTATE OF ORISON FLEMING 

MCDONALD, II, DECEASED

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF WICHITA COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 29,956-F

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” It is the 

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring same, for which let 

execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 11, 2016
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, C. Wayne Cape,certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Optio Software, Inc.; 

2.                 Based on myknowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3.                 Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the registrant andhave: 

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that the material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; and 

(b)         intentionally left blank 

(c)          Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and 

(d)         Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 

5.                 The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 1, 2007
|        | /s/ C. Wayne Cape       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | *C. Wayne Cape*         |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2472 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
116th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2472

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To redesignate the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Plum Brook 
Station, Ohio, as the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at the Neil A. 
                        Armstrong Test Facility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility 
Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds as follows:
            (1) Neil A. Armstrong, through his own definition, was 
        first and foremost as a test pilot.
            (2) A native of Wapakoneta, Ohio, Armstrong began his 
        inspiring career in space exploration in Cleveland, Ohio, at 
        what is now the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center.
            (3) Becoming the first human to land a spacecraft, and then 
        set foot upon, the moon, represents the greatest dream of any 
        test pilot.
            (4) Therefore, it is fitting that the premier aeronautics 
        and space test station in Ohio should be renamed in his honor.

SEC. 3. REDESIGNATION OF NASA JOHN H. GLENN RESEARCH CENTER AT PLUM 
              BROOK STATION, OHIO, AS NASA JOHN H. GLENN RESEARCH 
              CENTER AT THE NEIL A. ARMSTRONG TEST FACILITY.

    (a) Redesignation.--The NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Plum 
Brook Station, Ohio, is hereby redesignated as the NASA John H. Glenn 
Research Center at the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the station referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``NASA John 
H. Glenn Center at the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility''.
    (c) Savings.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter 
the relationship between the Plum Brook Station and the NASA John H. 
Glenn Research Center.

            Passed the Senate June 24, 2020.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
116th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2472

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To redesignate the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at Plum Brook 
Station, Ohio, as the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at the Neil A. 
                        Armstrong Test Facility.
```
# C_2009114EN.01001001.xml

| 19.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/10

---

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, is hereby launching a call for proposals in order to award grants to projects selected in the annex of the draft Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a programme to aid economic recovery by granting Community financial assistance to projects in the field of energy.

The maximum amount available under this call for proposals is EUR 3 980 000 000.

EUR 3 980 000 000

The call is closing on 15 July 2009.

15 July 2009

The complete text of the Call for proposals is available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/grants/2009_07_15_en.htm

---
#### STATE v. CAMPBELL

No. 99 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 361.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 April 1980.
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 6 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
      23.1**
















**GRUBER
      & COMPANY, LLC**


**400
      Lake Saint Louis Blvd.**


**Lake
      Saint Louis, MO, United States**


**Phone:
      (636) 561-5639**





















**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**








We
      consent to the use of our report dated February 1, 2007, relating to the
      financial statements of The Blackhawk Fund (“Blackhawk”) which include the
      statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the year
      ended December 31, 2006 appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
      Blackhawk as of December 31, 2006.









/ s/ 
Gruber & Company, LLC


Lake
      St.
      Louis, Missouri





January
      15, 2008