alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.12


 








AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO PROMISSORY NOTES


This Amendment No. 5 to Promissory Notes (this “Amendment”)
dated this 7th day of April, 2020, by and among Coro Global Inc. (formerly known as Hash Labs Inc.), a Nevada corporation (the
“Company”) and Lyle Hauser, an individual (the “Holder”).


WHEREAS, the Holder is the holder of
certain outstanding promissory notes (collectively, the “Notes”) of the Company, consisting of (i) a promissory note,
dated on or about January 14, 2019, in the original principal amount of $70,384.32, as amended by amendment No. 1 thereto, dated
April 9, 2019, amendment No. 2 thereto, dated July 3, 2019, amendment No. 3 thereto, dated October 1, 2019, and amendment no. 4
thereto, dated January 17, 2020; and (ii) an original issue discount promissory note, dated on or about February 28, 2019, in the
original principal amount of $110,000 (of which $100,000 has been repaid, leaving an outstanding balance of $10,000), as amended
by amendment No. 1 thereto, dated April 9, 2019, amendment No. 2 thereto, dated July 3, 2019, amendment No. 3 thereto, dated October
1, 2019, and amendment No. 4 thereto, dated January 17, 2020;


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder desire
to amend the Notes as more particularly set forth below;


WHEREFORE, the parties do hereby agree
as follows:


1.            The maturity
date of each of the Notes is hereby amended to be June 30, 2020.


2.            In consideration
for the extension of the maturity date of the Notes, the Company shall, promptly following execution of this Amendment, issue to
the Holder or his designee 33,000 shares of common stock.


3.            Except as modified
herein, the terms of the Notes shall remain in full force and effect.


4.            This Amendment
may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and shall be binding
upon all parties, their successors and assigns, and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same Amendment. A
signature delivered by facsimile or email shall constitute an original.


[Signature Page Follows]


 






    


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


	CORO GLOBAL INC.	 
	 	 
	By:	 /s/ J. Mark Goode	 
	Name: J. Mark Goode	 
	Title: Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:	/s/ Lyle Hauser	 
	Lyle Hauser
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Deputy Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer and Chief Operations Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of National Bank of Greece S.A. ("National Bank of Greece") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
(the "Report"), Takis Arapoglou, as Chairman and CEO of National Bank of Greece, Ioannis Pechlivanidis, as Deputy CEO, and Anthimos Thomopoulos, as CFO and COO, respectively, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



Dated
July 15, 2009

/s/    Efstratios-Georgios (Takis) A. Arapoglou Efstratios-Georgios (Takis) A. Arapoglou Chairman and Chief Executive Officer/s/    Ioannis G. Pechlivanidis Ioannis G. Pechlivanidis Vice-Chairman and
Deputy Chief Executive Officer/s/    Anthimos Thomopoulos Anthimos Thomopoulos Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operations Officer


The
above certificate is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---



QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 5) PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 5) PLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement.
 By: /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:
    
    Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:
    
    DirectorDate:
    
    June 23, 2006
 - 26 -
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the MARC Review Subcommittee A, February 15, 2007, 8 a.m. to February 15, 2007, 5 p.m. Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD, 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on January 30, 2007, 72 FR 4277.                

The meeting will now be held on February 15, 2007 from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. and on February 16, 2007, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: February 2, 2007. 

Anna Snouffer, 

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-557 Filed 2-7-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-336-CR

CIPRIANO RAMON ALMANZA III	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

						----------

	We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f). 							 													

							PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 15, 2009
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Monster
Offers, a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-QSB of the Company for the
quarter ended June 30, 2008 and filed with the U. S. Securities and
Exchange Commission ("Form 10-QSB").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Nate Kaup
-----------------
    Nate Kaup
    President/CFO


Date  August 12, 2008
      ---------------


<PAGE>
#### SMITHERS v. COLLINS

No. 246 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 255.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cr-00013-MP-AK

JAMES LEE EARLY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Motion Transfer Jurisdiction by USA as to James Lee

Early. Defendant was indicted in the Northern District of Florida and is currently being held by

the United States Marshal Service in the Middle District of Florida. Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 20(a)(2) allows transfer from the district where the indictment or information is

pending to the district where the defendant is held, if the defendant states a wish to waive trial in

the transferor district, plead guilty in the transferee district, and United States Attorneys in both

districts approve the transfer in writing. Here, the defendant has filed such a statement, which

bears the approval of both United States Attorneys, Doc. 5, Attachment 1. Defendant has also

consented to the transfer in writing, reciting that he intends to plead guilty, which would allow

transfer under Fed. R. Crim. P. 20(a)(1). Accordingly, the Motion to Transfer Jurisdiction is

GRANTED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of July, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ARMONDO SOLIS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv3-SPM/CAS

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated August 9, 2012 (doc. 21). No objections have been filed. 

Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that the

report and recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 24) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The 2254 petition (doc. 7) is denied.

3. A certificate of appealability pursuant to § 2254 Rule 11(a) is

denied because Petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial

Case 4:10-cv-00003-SPM-CAS Document 22 Filed 09/28/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

of a constitutional right..

4. Leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied. The Court certifies

that an appeal of these issues lacks a good faith basis. Fed. R. App. P.

24(a)(3)(A); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c).

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of September, 2012.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 4:10cv3-SPM/CAS

Case 4:10-cv-00003-SPM-CAS Document 22 Filed 09/28/12 Page 2 of 2
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 26, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-20-00716-CV

DESTINY BERKLEY, Appellant

V.

REGAL CROSSING APARTMENTS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-01469-C

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Nowell

Opinion by Justice Molberg

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By order dated October 22, 2020, 

the Court informed appellant the reporter’s record had been filed, vacated our 

October 8, 2020 order submitting the case without a reporter’s record, and ordered 

appellant to file her brief by November 20, 2020. By postcard dated November 24, 

2020, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed 

appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned 

appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in the 

dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a 
–2–

brief, filed an extension motion, nor otherwise corresponded with the Court 

regarding the status of this appeal.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c).

200716f.p05

/Ken Molberg//

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
–3–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DESTINY BERKLEY, Appellant

No. 05-20-00716-CV V.

REGAL CROSSING 

APARTMENTS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-01469-

C.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Molberg. Justices Reichek and 

Nowell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 26th day of January, 2021.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE

INEREST OF B.W. 

NO. 2023 CW 0510

AUGUST 14, 2023

In Re: A.W., applying for supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial

District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 23261. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED AS MOOT. The March 20, 2023 minute entry

included in the instant writ application reveals the trial court

has vacated the March 14, 2023 judgment granting the ex parte

motion filed by Morris and Jennifer Herrin, of which the instant

relator, A.W., seeks review. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

PMc

CHH

SMM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RHONDA DUBLAK,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10cv14-RH/CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER AFFIRMING THE DENIAL OF BENEFITS

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation, ECF No. 29. No objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The Commissioner’s decision denying the plaintiff’s application for

Case 5:10-cv-00014-RH-CJK Document 30 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 2
disability benefits is AFFIRMED. The clerk must enter judgment and close the

file.

SO ORDERED on August 2, 2011.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge

2

Case 5:10-cv-00014-RH-CJK Document 30 Filed 08/02/11 Page 2 of 2
[No. 23788.

Department One.

January 26, 1933.]

#### Elver L. Rice, *Appellant,*v. F. D. Hoffer *et al., Respondents.*
      *1*

*Wm. Shelter,*for appellant.

*Alex. McK. Vierhus,*for respondents.

Reported in 18 P. (2d) 510.

Parker, J.

The plaintiff, Rice, a wholesale jewelry merchant of Detroit, Michigan, seeks recovery of the sum of $284, claimed as the purchase price of an assortment of several dozen pieces of cheap jewelry sold by him to the defendants, Hoffer and wife, of the town of Edmonds, in Snohomish county, this state. The defense made by Hoffer and wife is fraud and misrepresentation on the part of Rice’s salesman inducing them to enter into the purchase contract. Trial in the superior court for that county, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment denying to Rice any recovery, from which he has appealed to this court.

At the time in question, Hoffer and wife conducted a small restaurant and candy shop in Edmonds. Without any help, they did all their cooking and waiting upon their customers. Jewelry was wholly foreign to their business, and they had no experience in that line of merchandising. On June 17, 1930, one of Rice’s salesmen came into their place of business and presented to Hoffer a proposition of selling them an assorted stock of cheap jewelry for retail in their business. The proposed sale order was wholly in a printed, stereotyped form, even as to the specifying of the number of pieces, their numbers being expressed in dozens or fractions thereof, and their respective prices per dozen, totaling $284.

Hoffer then signed the order so proposed by Rice’s salesman. Soon thereafter, Rice shipped the goods to Hoffer by express. Thereafter, Hoffer returned them to Rice and refused to pay for them. Rice received the returned goods, but claims that he holds them subject to the order of Hoffer, and not otherwise.

The trial judge found in part that:

> “The said sale was brought about by false and fraudulent statements and representations made by and on behalf of the said plaintiff falsely and fraudulently representing that by reason of observation and experience in respect to jewelry and the selling thereof which gave him particular knowledge of the subject, the plaintiff’s agent knew that the jewelry to be furnished by plaintiff would sell readily in defendant’s community and place of business; and falsely and fraudulently representing that the jewelry to be delivered by plain*702tiff to the defendants was of a kind, quality and value similar to the samples displayed to defendant by plaintiff’s agent.”

These findings and others more in detail, in harmony therewith, appear to us to be justified by the evidence. We think the cause does not call for further discussion by us.

The judgment is affirmed.

Tolman, Mitchell, Holcomb, and Millard, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Oilsands Quest Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended April 30, 2008, the undersigned Christopher H. Hopkins, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to            the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

March 18, 2009 

 

 

| /s/ Christopher H. Hopkins                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher H. Hopkins, Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, William Gerlib, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Explore Anywhere Holding Corp.





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within ninety (90) days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: January 19, 2011








By: /s/ William Gerlib


Name: William Gerlib,


Title: Interim CEO (Principal Executive Officer) and Director
**EXHIBIT 13.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying AnnualReport on Form 20-F of ONO Finance PLC (the “Company”) for the annualperiod ended December 31, 2004 (the “Periodic Report”), I, Adrian WaltonGower, Director of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge the Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Periodic Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|               | By:    |                    |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|               |   | /s/ Adrian Walton Gower |   |
|               |   | Adrian Walton Gower     |   |
|               |   | *Director*              |   |
|               |   |                    |
| June 30, 2005 |   |                    |

 

1

----