alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; HIV Vaccine Research and Design (HIVRAD) Program Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 26, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Courtyard Arlington Crystal City, 2889 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Club Room, Arlington, VA 22202.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Thomas J. Palker, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, DHHS/NIH/NIAID/DEA, Room 3119, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616, 301-402-8399,                         *palkert@niaid.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 5, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5679 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of EXPLORE ANYWHERE HOLIDNG CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Khris Thetsy, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: January 19, 2011
 
 
 By: /s/ Kris Thetsy Name: Kris Thetsy
 Title: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2





**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant to**


**18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350,**


**as
      Adopted Pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Jack
      M. Rapport, Chief Financial Officer of Z-II, Inc. (the ”Company”), hereby
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 (“the Company Form 10-Q”) fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained
      in
      the Company Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Jack M. Rapport
            
            May 13, 2008Jack M. Rapport - Chief Financial Officer
            
            Date
ROBERT E. BANKS

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 0476

Opinion filed February 24, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Robert E. Banks, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED

. See Baker v. State , 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).

LEWIS, C.J., BENTON and THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cr51-SPM

ROLANDO MACIAS, 

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Count One of this indictment. The

district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing Defendant's proposed

change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a report and recommendation

as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties consented to this procedure, and

the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the
Page 2 of 3

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:10cr51-SPM/WCS
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on July 20, 2010. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:10cr51-SPM/WCS
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31,
2007 of Abazias, Inc.. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      August 4, 2008/s/
      Oscar RodriquezOscar
      Rodriquez, Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Abazias, Inc.. and will be
retained by Abazias, Inc.. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-40830

Summary Calendar

Alan R. Decker, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

James Routledge; MedStar Surgical Company; OEM 

Medical Solutions, L.L.C.; Ted Honeywell, 

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:20-MC-12

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Alan R. Decker seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) to 

appeal the district court’s dismissal of his third diversity action arising from 

a purported 2004 conversion of his business. The district court concluded 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 28, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-40830 Document: 00516299689 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/28/2022
No. 20-40830

2

that Decker’s claims were barred by the applicable limitations periods and 

alternatively that he had failed to establish his allegations of fraud, intentional 

infliction of emotional distress, and defamation. By moving in this court to 

proceed IFP, Decker is challenging the district court’s certification that any 

appeal would not be taken in good faith because he had not shown that he will 

present a nonfrivolous appellate issue. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 

(5th Cir. 1997); Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982).

Before this court, Decker argues that the district court misinterpreted 

the facts establishing that he was in a coma for years, which prevented him 

from learning of the conversion of his business and tolled the limitations 

periods, and that the court abused its discretion in denying his motion for 

reconsideration. He has not established that he could not reasonably have 

discovered the factual predicate of his claims earlier. See Lozada v. Farrall 

& Blackwell Agency, Inc., 323 S.W.3d 278, 289 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2010, no 

pet.). Moreover, the defendants’ alleged ongoing possession of Decker’s 

business does not constitute a continuing tort. See First Gen. Realty Corp. v. 

Maryland Cas. Co., 981 S.W.2d 495, 501-02 (Tex. App.—Austin 1998, pet. 

denied). Accordingly, Decker has not shown that the district court abused 

its discretion in dismissing his complaint as frivolous and in denying his 

motion for reconsideration. See Newsome v. E.E.O.C., 301 F.3d 227, 231 (5th 

Cir. 2002); Dearmore v. City of Garland, 519 F.3d 517, 520 (5th Cir. 2008). 

The appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. See Howard 

v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983). Accordingly, Decker’s motion to 

proceed IFP is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See

Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202 n.24; 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 20-40830 Document: 00516299689 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/28/2022
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quadra Projects Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Claude Diedrick, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   

/s/ Claude DiedrickClaude DiedrickPresident, Chief Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial Officer, Treasurer and DirectorDate: November 27, 2009

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2196 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, as the ‘‘Lucas Lowe 

Memorial Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2019 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 11158 Highway 146 North in Hardin, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Lucas Lowe Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LUCAS LOWE MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 11158 Highway 146 North in 

6 Hardin, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Lucas Lowe Memorial Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2196 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lucas Lowe Memorial 

3 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


Pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Amended Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-Q of Vycor Medical, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2010, I
                  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:  (1)
                           
                           
                           the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
                              31, 2010 of Vycor Medical, Inc. fully complies with the requirements
                              of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
                           
                           
                           the information contained in the Amended Quarterly Report on Form
                              10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, fairly presents in all
                              material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
                              of Vycor Medical, Inc.   By:
                           
                           
                           /s/ Kenneth T. CovielloName:
                           
                           
                           Kenneth T. CovielloTitle:
                           
                           
                           Principal Executive OfficerDate:
                           
                           
                           September 2, 2011
#### In the Matter of the Petition of Charles E. Thedford, as Administrator of the Estate of Marie A. Stouffer, Deceased, Respondent, to Compel Adele L. Rouyon, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of Alphonse Rouyon, Deceased, Appellant, to Render and Settle Her Account. Lucy J. Mackay et al., Appellants.

*Matter of Thedford,*184 App. Div. 911, affirmed.

(Argued November 13, 1918;

decided December 3, 1918.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 24, 1918, which affirmed a decree of the Kings County Surrogate’s Court settling the accounts of Adele L. Rouyon as administratrix with the will annexed of Alphonse Rouyon and directing distribution. The testator’s will gave his widow a life estate with power to dispose of the principal, and directed that “ upon her decease ” all of his property *“*then undisposed of be divided ” among his surviving children and the issue of those previously deceased. The appellants Rouyon and Mackay are the only daughters who survived the widow, and the appellants Abbes and Bigelow are the only children of a deceased daughter of the decedent, who also survived the widow. The respondent Thedford is the husband óf a deceased granddaughter, who died before the widow, without issue, and he is also the administrator of the estate of his mother-in-law, a daughter of the decedent, who also died during the widow’s lifetime. The issue, involved in this. proceeding is whether the decedent’s will gave to his children interests in the remainder which vested immediately upon his death, and which, therefore, passed to their estates upon their death before that of the widow, or whether such interests were dependent upon their or their issue surviving the widow.

*John Ewen*and *Rudolph Dugan*for appellants.

*Clarence L. Westcott*and *Charles S. M. First*for respondent.

*717Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SHANE SHAW,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3957 and 4D16-3966

[ July 6, 2017 ]

Consolidated appeals of orders denying rule 3.800 motion from the 

Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; 

Dennis D. Bailey, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 11-7302 CF10A and 11-7595 

CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Stacey Kime, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael 

Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice.

MAY, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company.    /s/ Ted R. Sharp DATE:  May 14, 2007 Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DOUGLAS WALKER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00097-MP-GRJ

WALTER A MCNEIL,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 33, Motion for Certificate of Appealability by

Douglas Walker. On June 8, 2011, defendant filed a notice of appeal as to the Court’s order

dismissing his petition for habeas corpus without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

An appeal may not be taken to the court of appeals from the final order in a habeas corpus

proceeding unless the Court issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1). The

Court may issue a certificate of appealability only if the applicant has made a substantial showing

of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2).

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, Doc. 13, and the Order, Doc.

15, the Court finds that Petitioner fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right and the issues are not adequate enough to deserve encouragement to proceed

further. Accordingly, it is hereby

Case 1:10-cv-00097-MP-GRJ Document 34 Filed 07/21/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Petitioner’s motion for certificate of appealability, Doc. 33, is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of July, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-00097-MP-GRJ

Case 1:10-cv-00097-MP-GRJ Document 34 Filed 07/21/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2009267EN.01000202.xml

| 7.11.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 267/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 267/2

---

Election of Presidents of Chambers

2009/C 267/04

At a meeting on 7 October 2009, the Judges of the Court of Justice, pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 10(1) of the Rules of Procedure, elected Mr Tizzano, Mr Cunha Rodrigues, Mr Lenaerts and Mr Bonichot as Presidents of the First, Second, Third and Fourth Chambers of five Judges respectively, for a period of three years expiring on 6 October 2012.

At a meeting on 8 October 2009, the Judges of the Court of Justice, pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 10(1) of the Rules of Procedure, elected Mr Levitz, Ms Lindh, Ms Silva de Lapuerta and Ms Toader as Presidents of the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh and Eighth Chambers of three Judges respectively, for a period of one year expiring on 6 October 2010.

---