alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Presidential Determination Relating to Assistance for Saudi Arabia

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State  

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States, including section 582 of the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2006 (Public Law 109-102), and that section as carried forward by the Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007 (Public Law 110-5), and the Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2008 (Public Law 110-92), I hereby certify that Saudi Arabia is cooperating with efforts to combat international terrorism and that the proposed assistance will help facilitate that effort, and hereby waive the application of such sections. 

                    You are authorized and directed to report this certification to the Congress and publish it in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

[FR Doc. 07-5372

Billing code 4710-10-P
Page 1 of 3

Case No. 4:10cv234-RH/CAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOHN LUTHER OWENS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv234-RH/CAS

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING THE PETITION AND

DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

The second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 

2254 is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, ECF 

No. 21. No objections have been filed. The report and recommendation is correct 

and is adopted as the court’s opinion.

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires a district court to 

“issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to 

the applicant.” Under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability may 

issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-38 (2003); Slack 

Case 4:10-cv-00234-RH-CAS Document 22 Filed 07/10/12 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 4:10cv234-RH/CAS

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000); Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 

n.4 (1983); see also Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 402-13 (2000) (setting out 

the standards applicable to a § 2254 petition on the merits). As the Court said in 

Slack:

 To obtain a COA under § 2253(c), a habeas prisoner must make a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a 

demonstration that, under Barefoot, includes showing that reasonable 

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition 

should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues 

presented were “ ‘adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.’ 

” 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 483-84 (quoting Barefoot, 463 U.S. at 893 n.4). Further, in 

order to obtain a certificate of appealability when dismissal is based on procedural 

grounds, a petitioner must show, “at least, that jurists of reason would find it 

debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court 

was correct in its procedural ruling.” Id. at 484. 

The petitioner has not made the required showing. 

For these reasons,

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED.

2. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The petition is DENIED with 

prejudice.” 

Case 4:10-cv-00234-RH-CAS Document 22 Filed 07/10/12 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 4:10cv234-RH/CAS

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. Leave to appeal in forma pauperis is DENIED.

5. The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on July 10, 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00234-RH-CAS Document 22 Filed 07/10/12 Page 3 of 3
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2349 

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to eliminate the common 

carrier exemption for telecommunications companies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 31, 2019 

Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Trade Commission Act to eliminate 

the common carrier exemption for telecommunications 

companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protection from 

5 Robocalling Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds that— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2349 IS

1 (1) illegal robocalls and spam calls are a grow2 ing annoyance and problem for the people of the 

3 United States; and 

4 (2) exemptions within the Federal Trade Com5 mission Act (15 U.S.C. 41 et seq.) limit the enforce6 ment capabilities of the Federal Trade Commission 

7 with respect to illegal robocalling and spam calling. 

8 SEC. 3. ELIMINATING THE COMMON CARRIER EXEMPTION 

9 FOR TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES. 

10 Section 4 of the Federal Trade Commission Act (15 

11 U.S.C. 44) is amended by striking ‘‘the Act entitled ‘An 

12 Act to regulate commerce,’ approved February 14, 1887, 

13 and all Acts amendatory thereof and supplementary there14 to and the Communications Act of 1934’’ and inserting 

15 ‘‘subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code,’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 15.1  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-184351) pertaining to the Executive Share Option Plan, Long-Term Umbrella Incentive Plan, Non-Executive Directors Equity Incentive Plan, Executive Officer IPO Stock Option Grants and Non-Executive Director IPO Stock Option Grants of Luxfer Holdings PLC of our report dated March 31, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Luxfer Holdings PLC  included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2013.   /s/ Ernst & Young LLPManchester, EnglandMarch 31, 2014
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61356-61357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5410]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

October 19, 2007.

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, November 1, 2007.

Place: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. Emerald Coal 
Resources, LP, Docket No. PENN 2007-251-E, and Secretary of Labor v. 
Cumberland Coal

[[Page 61357]]

Resources, LP, Docket No. PENN 2007-252-E. (Issues include whether the 
Administrative Law Judge erred in upholding the Secretary's decision to 
require that the operators' Emergency Response Plans (ERPs) contain 
provisions mandating that the operators provide purchase orders for 
rescue chambers.)
    The Commission heard oral argument in these matters on October 23, 
2007.
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,
Chief Docket Clerk.
[FR Doc. 07-5410 Filed 10-26-07; 1:33 pm]
BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
# C_2009082EN.01000101.xml

| 4.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/1

---

(2009/C 82/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 69, 21.3.2009

OJ C 69, 21.3.2009

Past publications

OJ C 55, 7.3.2009

OJ C 44, 21.2.2009

OJ C 32, 7.2.2009

OJ C 19, 24.1.2009

OJ C 6, 10.1.2009

OJ C 327, 20.12.2008

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-9 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-9 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-9 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-9 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 30-9 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 5 of 5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RAJA IMRAN KHAN,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09cv405/RS-EMT

BALBOA LIFE AND CASUALTY,

LLC, 

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8). 

Plaintiff has not filed objections.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is approved and is

incorporated in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice because of Plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on June 1, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Epocrates, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") for the purpose of complying with
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code.

Rosemary
A. Crane, the Chief Executive Officer and Patrick D. Spangler, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certifies that, to the best of his or her
knowledge:



Date:
March 31, 2011

/s/ ROSEMARY A. CRANEName:    Rosemary A. CraneChief Executive Officer/s/ PATRICK D. SPANGLERName:    Patrick D. SpanglerChief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 3) PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 3) PLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement.
 By: /s/ Jonathon William AlbrightName:
    
    Jonathon William AlbrightTitle:
    
    DirectorDate:
    
    June 27, 2007
 -26-
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-32,290-02

IN RE JOSEPH ROBERT ELLIS, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. CR15034 IN THE 266 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM ERATH COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus under this

Court’s original jurisdiction. He contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in

Erath County and his application has not been properly forwarded to this Court.

Respondent, the District Clerk of Erath County, shall forward Relator’s habeas application

to this Court, respond that Relator has not filed a habeas application in Erath County, or forward a

copy of an order designating issues together with correspondence documenting the date the State

received Relator’s habeas application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(c) and (d); TEX.

R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(5). This motion for leave to file will be held. Respondent shall comply with this

order within thirty days from the date of this order.
2

Filed: May 12, 2021

Do not publish
# White Cane Safety Day, 2007

Our country upholds the value of every person, and all Americans deserve an opportunity to realize the American dream. Many citizens who are blind or visually impaired use white canes to achieve greater independence and increase mobility and productivity. On White Cane Safety Day, we celebrate the symbolism of the white cane, and we underscore our dedication to ensuring more individuals have the ability to lead active lives and achieve their personal and professional goals. 

My Administration is committed to helping Americans with disabilities live and work with greater freedom. Through the New Freedom Initiative, we are building on the progress of the Americans with Disabilities Act and helping our citizens who are blind or visually impaired gain greater access to the workplace, school, and community life. By working to tear down barriers, we are creating a society where all people are encouraged to reach their full potential and where the promise of our great Nation is accessible for everyone. 

The Congress, by joint resolution (Public Law 88-628) approved on October 6, 1964, as amended, has designated October 15 of each year as “White Cane Safety Day.” 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim October 15, 2007, as White Cane Safety Day. I call upon public officials, business leaders, educators, and all the people of the United States to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twelfth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07-5140

Billing code 3195-01-P
#### BELL v. BELL

No. 251 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 585.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Yuh Hisn Liu, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Quadra Projects Inc. for the three months ended February 29, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quadra Projects Inc.

|Dated: April 7, 2008 | By:    | /s/Yuh Hsin Liu                          
|-------------------- | ------ | -----------------------------------------
|                     | Name:  | Yuh Hsin Liu                             
|                     | Title: | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
|                     |        | Accounting Officer, Secretary and        
|                     |        | Director                                 

---
Exhibit 32



Written Statement of the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with
18 U.S.C. §1350, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Marcus Corporation (the “Company”),
hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Gregory S. Marcus                 | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Gregory S. Marcus                     | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                      | 
|/s/ Douglas A. Neis                   | 
|Douglas A. Neis                       | 
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | 
|                                      | 
|Date: October 9, 2012                 |
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global MobileTech, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 2 for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Aik Fun Chong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  July 11, 2011

By: /s/ Aik Fun Chong

 

       Aik Fun Chong

 

       President and Chief   

       Executive Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      13,725,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,796,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 12,243,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,259,000
<PP&E>                                      43,023,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              16,907,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,375,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,557,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,998,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,850,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,375,000
<SALES>                                     81,319,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            81,319,000
<CGS>                                       71,705,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,921,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,158,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   846,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            846,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   846,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT EARL ROYSTER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv195/RV/EMT

ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause is before the court on Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (Doc. 1). Upon review of the complaint, it is unclear whether Plaintiff intended to file the

complaint as an original complaint in a new civil rights action, or as an amended complaint in

Royster v. Morgan, Case No. 3:10cv30/LAC/MD. Therefore, Plaintiff will be required to clarify

his intent.

If Plaintiff intended the complaint as an amended complaint in Case No. 3:10cv30/LAC/MD,

he shall file a notice with the court stating such. If Plaintiff intended to commence a new civil rights

action, he must either pay the $350 filing fee or obtain leave to proceed in forma pauperis by filing

a fully and properly completed motion and attachments.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a form motion to proceed in forma pauperis and

affidavit of financial status for use by non-prisoners in the Northern District. This case number shall

be written on the form.

2. If Plaintiff filed the instant complaint with the intent to commence a new civil rights

action, he shall pay the filing fee of $350.00, or submit a fully completed motion to proceed in forma

pauperis with the requisite financial affidavit within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of

docketing of this order. ALTERNATIVELY, if Plaintiff filed the instant complaint with the intent
Page 2 of 2

to file an amended complaint in Case No. 3:10cv30/LAC/MD, he shall file a notice with the court

stating such within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order.

3. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order as instructed may result in a

recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of June 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cv195/RV/EMT
# I k A I

## MIA

# ML. 1,



### STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RANDY MILLER NO. 2024 KW 0165

In Re: 

### Randy Miller, applying for supervisory writs, 21st

Judicial District Court, Parish of Livingston, No. 40507.
BEFORE: WELCH, WOLFE, AND STROMBERG, JJ.

WRIT DENIED AS MOOT. The records of the Livingston Parish 

## Clerkof Court reflect that the district court denied the motion 

## toquashon January 10, 2024.



### COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT e -- N


### DUTY CLERK OF COURT Y 

# tPlUIR THE COURT