alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)
      and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                     OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of Redwood Entertainment Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form  10-KSB  for the year ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Kathy Procopio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.



Date: May 17, 2004            By: /S/ Kathy Procopio
                              ---------------------------------
                              Kathy Procopio, Chief Financial Officer
1 ... S ee T EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SEC OND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 09 9- CV
CH R I S T I NA ANN HA B AL A AP P E L L ANT V . M I C H A EL STEV EN H A BA LA A PPELL EE

----- ----- FR O M THE 3 24 DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY TH

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON AND J UDGME NT 1

----- ----- -- O n M a r c h 1 3 , 2 0 0 8 a n d M a r c h 2 6 , 2 0 0 8 , w e n o t if ie d a p p e lla n t , in
a c c o r d a n c e w it h r u le o f a p p e lla t e p r o c e d u r e 4 2 .3 (c ), t h a t w e w o u ld d is m is s t h is
a p p e a l u n l e s s th e $ 1 7 5 fi l i n g fe e w a s p a i d . S ee T EX . R. A PP . P . 4 2 .3 (c ). A p p e l l a n t h a s n o t p a i d th e $ 1 7 5 fi l i n g fe e . S ee T EX . R. A PP . P . 5 , 1 2 .1 (b ).2 ... S ee S u p re m e C o u rt o f T e x ., O rde r R eg a rd in g Fe e s Ch a r

g e d i n C i vil C ases i n the S uprem e C our tand the C our ts of A ppeal s and Before the Judi ci al Pa n e l o n Mu lti

d i s tr i c tL iti g a tion , M i s c . Doc k e t No. 07- 9138 ( Aug. 28, 2007 ) (l i s ti n g fe e s i n c o u rt o f a p p e a l s ). 2 Beca us e app el l ant has f ai l ed t o com pl y w i t h a r equ i r em ent of t he r ul es of
a pp e l l a t e p r oc e du r e a nd t he Te xa s Su pr e m e Cou r t ’ s o r de r o f Aug us t 28, 2007 , 2
w e d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l . S ee T EX . R. A PP . P . 4 2 .3 (c ), 4 3 .2 (f). A ppel l ant shal l pay al l cost s of t hi s appeal , f or w hi ch l et execut i on i ssue. S ee T EX . R. A PP . P. 43. 4.

P E R CU R I AM
PA N EL D : L I V I N G STO N , D A U PH I N O T, an d HO LM A N , JJ. DEL I VERE D: Apr i l 17, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 217 (Friday, November 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 63633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5625]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Ames Department Stores, Inc., Bradlees, Inc., 
Caldor Corp., and Stuarts Department Stores, Inc.; Order of Suspension 
of Trading

November 7, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Ames Department Stores, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended May 4, 2002.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Bradlees, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since it 
filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended October 28, 2000.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Caldor Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since it 
filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 1998.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Stuarts Department Stores, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic 
reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended October 28, 
1995.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed companies.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on November 7, 
2007, through 11:59 p.m. EST on November 20, 2007.

    By the Commission.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-5625 Filed 11-7-07; 11:20 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 10.13


 


To: Steve Saferin (Chair Compensation Committee,
Inspired Entertainment, Inc.)


 


From: Lorne Weil, Executive Chair 


 


March 26, 2020


 


Dear Steve:


 


While I appreciate the Board’s support
and the effort that went into the January 31, 2020 employment agreement, currently awaiting stockholder approval, I am mindful
of the unprecedented situation we find ourselves in with the Covid-19 pandemic and various government ordered closures in
countries where Inspired does business. In light of that, I would prefer to withdraw from the new contract and remain employed
under my original Employment Agreement of January 16, 2017 (as amended). We can then focus on mitigating the
impact of the pandemic on the Company now, and if appropriate address a replacement contract in the future.


 


If you agree, please let me know and we
can just withdraw the January 31, 2020 item from the AGM at this point.


 


	Very truly	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Lorne Weil	 	 	 
	Lorne Weil	 	 	 
	 	 		 
	 	 	Agreed: 	/s/ Steven M. Saferin
	 	 	 	Steven M. Saferin
	 	 	 	03.26.20
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 213 (Monday, November 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5469]



[[Page 62489]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[UT-020-5101-ER7-J217]


Correction to Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact 
Statement to Analyze PacifiCorp's Mona to Oquirrh Double-Circuit 50/345 
Kilovolt (kV) Transmission Line, UT-82829, and Amend the Pony Express 
Resource Management Plan for the Salt Lake Field Office, Utah. (Federal 
Register; October 16, 2007, Volume 72, Number 199, Page 58681-58682)

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The following corrections are made: Three scoping meetings 
(West Jordan, Tooele, and Nephi, Utah) will be held during the scoping 
period. The Mona to Oquirrh Transmission Line project Web site is 
http://www.monatransmission.com.
    All other information within the Notice of Intent (10/16/07) 
remains unchanged.

    Dated: October 30, 2007.
Kent Hoffman,
Acting Utah State Director.
[FR Doc. 07-5469 Filed 11-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5101-$$-M
# C_2011299EN.01000401.xml

| 11.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/4

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2011/666/CFSP, and in Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 999/2011 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus apply

2011/C 299/05

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of persons that appear in Annex IIIA to Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP, as amended by Council Decision 2011/666/CFSP (1), and in Annex IA to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 999/2011 (2) concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2010/639/CFSP and in Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus. The grounds for designations of those persons appear in the relevant entries in those Annexes.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG K Coordination |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG K Coordination

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's Decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, 2nd paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 265, 11.10.2011, p. 24.

1

(2)  OJ L 265, 11.10.2011, p. 6.

2

---
atel_Ex4_1


		
			Exhibit 4.1
		

		
			 
		

		
			DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY MEMBERSHIP INTEREST (“UNITS”)
		

		
			Fast Act Exhibit 4(vi) “Description of registrant’s securities”
		

		
			 
		

		
			Summary
		

		
			 
		

		
			The following description summarizes certain important terms of ATEL Growth Capital Fund 8, LLC’s (the “Company”) membership interests (the “Units”). This description summarizes the provisions that are included in the Company’s Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”).  This summary will not provide all the information relevant to the Units. For a complete description of the Units,  please refer to the applicable provisions of Company’s Operating Agreement and relevant California governing law.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Outstanding Units
		

		
			 
		

		
			1,612,396 Units have been subscribed by the members of the Company as of December 31, 2019.
		

		
			 
		

		
			General
		

		
			 
		

		
			Liquidity. The Units were offered and sold pursuant to registration under the Securities Act of 1933, and subsequently registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  However, the Units are subject to significant restriction on transferability in order to preserve the tax characterization of the Company and tax consequences for Unit holders.  Accordingly, the Units are not traded on any securities exchange and have limited liquidity.  Please review the rights of Unit holders for transfer of shares under the Operating Agreement.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Voting Rights. The holders of Units are entitled to one vote per share on any matter to be voted upon by holders of Units in the Company’s Operating Agreement. Certain rights may only be exercised upon receiving at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by Unit holders
		

		
			 
		

		
			Distributions.  The holders of Units are entitled to distributions on a pro rata basis, if, as, and when distributed by the Manager.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Other Rights. No holder of Units has any priority or preemptive right as to the Units.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dissolution and Winding Up. Upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the Unit holders are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of creditors.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Transfer Agent and Registrar.  The transfer agent and registrar of the Units is Conduent Inc.
#### STATE v. CURRENCE

No. 128.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 263.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 24 May 1972.
Exhibit 11


            Computation of Net Earnings Per Common Share



<TABLE>
                           Three Months Ended            Six Months Ended
                                 June 30,                    June 30,
                       --------------------------   -------------------------
                           1999          1998          1999          1998
                       -----------    -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                    <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>
EARNINGS
--------

Net Earnings           $ 2,418,761    $ 2,682,915   $ 4,917,219   $ 5,122,832
SHARES                 ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========

Weighted Average
 Number of Common
 Shares Outstanding
   (See Note)            5,904,794      4,860,132     5,896,854     4,848,075

Additional Shares
 Assuming Conversion
 of Stock Options           90,024        267,026        86,210       240,385
                       -----------    -----------   -----------   -----------
Weighted Average
 Common Shares
 Outstanding and
 Equivalents             5,994,818      5,127,158     5,983,064     5,088,460
                       ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========

Basic Net Earnings
 Per Share             $       .41    $       .55   $       .83   $      1.06
                       ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========

Diluted Net Earnings
 Per Share             $       .40    $       .52   $       .82   $      1.01
                       ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========
</TABLE>

Note:  All activity during the year has been adjusted for the number of
days in the year that the shares were outstanding.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 24 (Tuesday, February 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5428-5433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-498]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates

AGENCY: DoD, Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee.

ACTION: Republication of Revised Non-Foreign Overseas Per Diem Rates to 
Civilian Bulletin 251.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Per Diem, Travel and Transportation Allowance Committee is 
re-publishing Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin Number 251 to 
correct an error in the Per Diem rate published on January 26, 2007 (72 
FR 3799). This bulletin lists revisions in the per diem rates 
prescribed for U.S. Government employees for official travel in Alaska, 
Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands and Possessions of 
the United States. AEA changes announced in Bulletin Number 194 remain 
in effect. Bulletin Number 251 is being published in the Federal 
Register to assure that travelers are paid per diem at the most current 
rates.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 1, 2007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document gives notice of revisions in 
per diem rates prescribed by the Per Diem Travel and Tranportation 
Allowance Committee for non-foreign areas outside the continental 
United States. It supersedes Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletin 
Number 250. Distribution of Civilian Personnel Per Diem Bulletins by 
mail was discontinued. Per Diem Bulletins published periodically in the 
Federal Register now constitute the only notification of revisions in 
per diem rates to agencies and establishments outside the Department of 
Defense. For more information or questions about per diem rates, please 
contact your local travel office. The text of the Bulletin follows:

    Dated: January 30, 2006.
C.R. Choate,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 5429]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06FE07.001


[[Page 5430]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06FE07.002


[[Page 5431]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06FE07.003


[[Page 5432]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06FE07.004


[[Page 5433]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06FE07.005

[FR Doc. 07-498 Filed 2-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KEVIN ANTHONY MOORE,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv38/RH/EMT

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Plaintiff, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, commenced this action by filing a civil rights

complaint (see Doc. 1), which the court construes as brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and

Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S. Ct. 1999, 29

L. Ed. 2d 619 (1971). Plaintiff has also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc.

2). In the affidavit of financial status attached to his motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, Plaintiff indicates that his monthly income is approximately $1,000.00, with monthly debts

totaling approximately $675.00 (id. at 3). Thus Plaintiff reports that he has approximately $325.00

per month available in disposable income. Additionally, Plaintiff states that he owns an

unencumbered vehicle worth $1000.00. Therefore, it affirmatively appears that leave to proceed in

forma pauperis should be denied.1

 In order to proceed with this case, Plaintiff must pay the full

1

 In response to questions in Section IV. Financial Status pertaining to the ownership of

real property, Plaintiff indicates that he does not own the home in which he resides and he does

not identify in whose name the property is titled. Nevertheless, Plaintiff indicates there is

approximately $11,000.00 of equity in the home and to whom the mortgage payment is made. 

Thus, while it not entirely clear whether Plaintiff in fact has an ownership interest in the

property, to the extent he does the court likewise considers this asset in determining his

eligibility to proceed in forma pauperis. 
Page 2 of 2

filing fee of $350.00. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED. 

Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of docketing of this order.

2. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation of dismissal of this

case for failure to comply with an order of the court. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of March 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 5:10cv38/RH/EMT
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 1:06-cv-14981-AKH Document 1 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 13 of 13
#### EVE GRIFFIN BERKLEY v. W. RUSSELL BERKLEY.

(Filed 9 October 1963.)

Appeal by defendant from an In Chambers order entered by *Mintz, J.,*on May 24, 1963, in New HaNoveR Superior Court.

The plaintiff, Eva Griffin Berkley, instituted this civil action against W. Russell Berkley, her husband, for alimony without divorce. Her prayer for relief included alimony *pendente lite*and counsel fees. *313After motions to amend the complaint and strike certain of its allegations were passed on by the court, the parties offered evidence in the form of affidavits as to plaintiff’s need for the requested *pendente*allowances and as to defendant’s financial ability to pay them. The court made certain findings of fact, and on the basis of the findings entered .am order that pending the final hearing the plaintiff should have the use of the home and the defendant should pay the plaintiff $75.00 per month for the support of herself and the minor daughter of the parties. The court allowed $200.00 counsel fees. The defendant excepted and appealed.

*Addison*Hewlett, *Jr.., for plaintiff appellee.*

*Isaac C. Wright for defendant appellant.*

Per Curiam.

The evidence before Judge Mintz was conflicting with respect to the cause of the separation; likewise, divergent claims were made as to the respective incomes and needs of the parties. While the court might have made more specific and detailed findings, nevertheless enough appears to support the *pendente*allowance®.

Of course, th-e defendant will have opportunity to make good on his alleged defenses when the controversy is heard on the merits. Sufficient reason to disturb the order does not appear.

Affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

Nutrisystem, Inc.: 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-117781 and 333-110772) on Form S-3 and registration statements (Nos. 333-44908, 333-134215 and 333-119009) on Form S-8 of Nutrisystem, Inc. of our reports dated March 7,2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Nutrisystem, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cashflows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report onForm 10-K of Nutrisystem, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

March 7, 2011
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Bradley Curtis Kougher, Appellant

No. 06-18-00026-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

1726305). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Moseley and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Bradley Curtis Kougher, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 8, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk