alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



American Capital Agency Corp.

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



We, Malon Wilkus, Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chairman of the Board of Directors, and John R. Erickson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Capital Agency Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                                                                          
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |    
|Date: July 12, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    MALON
WILKUS                                                      
|                    |  |     |  | Malon Wilkus Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |    
|Date: July 12, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    JOHN R.
ERICKSON                                                  
|                    |  |     |  | John R. Erickson Chief
Financial Officer and Executive Vice President    



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2013011EN.01008801.xml

| 15.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/88 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/88

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 2001/110/EC relating to honey’

COM(2012) 530 final — 2012/0260 (COD)

2013/C 11/25

On 22 October 2012, the European Parliament and on 4 October 2012, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 2001/110/EC relating to honey

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 2001/110/EC relating to honey

COM(2012) 530 final — 2012/0260 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided at its 484th plenary session of 14 and 15 November 2012 (meeting of 14 November), by 150 votes nem con with 8 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 14 November 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
Exhibit 7.1



Globe Telecom, Inc.



Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges



(in million Pesos except ratios)



|                                                           |  |         
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------
|                                                           |  | 2003    
|U.S. GAAP:                                                 |  |         
|Earnings:                                                  |  |         
|Income before income tax under U.S. GAAP                   |  | 10,207.3
|Add (deduct):                                              |  |         
|Interest expense and other charges (excluding capitalized) |  | 4,394.9 
|Interest component of rent expense                         |  | 2.1     
|Dividends on preferred shares                              |  | 68.0    
|                                                           |  |         
|                                                           |  | 14,672.3
|                                                           |  |         
|Fixed Charges:                                             |  |         
|Interest expense and other charges (including capitalized) |  | 5,016.8 
|Interest component of rent expense                         |  | 2.1     
|Dividends on preferred shares                              |  | 68.0    
|                                                           |  |         
|                                                           |  | 5,086.9 
|                                                           |  |         
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                         |  | 2.9     
|Philippine GAAP                                            |  |         
|Earnings:                                                  |  |         
|Income before income tax under Philippine GAAP             |  | 10,857.8
|Add (deduct):                                              |  |         
|Interest expense and other charges (excluding capitalized) |  | 4,394.9 
|Interest component of rent expense                         |  | 2.1     
|Dividends on preferred shares                              |  | 68.0    
|                                                           |  |         
|                                                           |  | 15,322.8
|                                                           |  |         
|Fixed Charges:                                             |  |         
|Interest expense and other charges (including capitalized) |  | 5,016.8 
|Interest component of rent expense                         |  | 2.1     
|Dividends on preferred shares                              |  | 68.0    
|                                                           |  |         
|                                                           |  | 5,086.9 
|                                                           |  |         
|                                                           | 
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                         |  | 3.0
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2472 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center 

at Plum Brook Station, Ohio, as the NASA John H. 

Glenn Research Center at the Neil A. Armstrong Test 

Facility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2472 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Neil A. Armstrong 

3 Test Facility Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds as follows: 

6 (1) Neil A. Armstrong, through his own defini7 tion, was first and foremost as a test pilot. 

8 (2) A native of Wapakoneta, Ohio, Armstrong 

9 began his inspiring career in space exploration in 

10 Cleveland, Ohio, at what is now the NASA John H. 

11 Glenn Research Center. 

12 (3) Becoming the first human to land a space13 craft, and then set foot upon, the moon, represents 

14 the greatest dream of any test pilot. 

15 (4) Therefore, it is fitting that the premier aer16 onautics and space test station in Ohio should be re17 named in his honor. 

18 SEC. 3. REDESIGNATION OF NASA JOHN H. GLENN RE19 SEARCH CENTER AT PLUM BROOK STATION, 

20 OHIO, AS NASA JOHN H. GLENN RESEARCH 

21 CENTER AT THE NEIL A. ARMSTRONG TEST 

22 FACILITY. 

23 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The NASA John H. Glenn 

24 Research Center at Plum Brook Station, Ohio, is hereby 

25 redesignated as the NASA John H. Glenn Research Cen26 ter at the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility. 
3 

†S 2472 ES

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the station referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘NASA John H. Glenn 

5 Center at the Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility’’. 

6 (c) SAVINGS.—Nothing in this section shall be con7 strued to alter the relationship between the Plum Brook 

8 Station and the NASA John H. Glenn Research Center. 

Passed the Senate June 24, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2472 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the NASA John H. Glenn Research 

Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility. NASA John H. Glenn Research Center at the Center at Plum Brook Station, Ohio, as the
Case 1:06-cv-15156-AKH Document 2 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Election Assistance Commission

# Agency:

 United States Election Assistance Commission.

# Action:

 Notice of public meeting for EAC Standards Board.

# Date and Time:

 Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. and Thursday, December 13, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. and Friday, December 14, 2007, 8:30 a.m.-12 p.m.

# Place:

 Omni Hotel Downtown, 700 San Jacinto Boulevard at 8th Street, Austin, TX 78701, Phone number (512) 476-3700.

# Purpose:

 The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Standards Board, as required by the Help America Vote Act of 2002, will meet to consider and receive presentations on the proposed next iteration of the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), as were submitted to EAC from the commission's Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC).  The Standards Board will formulate recommendations to EAC regarding the guidelines and consider other administrative matters.  The EAC Board of Advisors will meet at the same time and some of the Standards Board sessions will be held jointly with the Board of Advisors.

This meeting will be open to the public.

# For Further Information Contact:

 Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,

Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-5637 Filed 11-7-07; 4:24 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CRAIG K. STATEN,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv108/WS/EMT

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________ /

O R D E R

Plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, has filed a complaint for judicial review of an adverse

administrative decision of the Defendant and an amended or a motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis (Docs. 1, 9). Previously, the court has twice denied Plaintiff’s applications to proceed in

forma pauperis (Docs. 5, 8). 

In the affidavit of financial status attached to the instant motion, Plaintiff indicates that his

wife earns the gross amount of $34,000.00 per year working for the Department of Defense as an

administrative assistant, and he presently receives $110.00 per month in Veterans Administration

disability benefits (Doc. 9 at 4). Plaintiff lists monthly debts totaling approximately $2,272.00. 

Based on Plaintiff’s stated household income and expenses, the court concludes that leave to proceed

in forma pauperis should be denied. Therefore, in order to proceed with this case, Plaintiff must pay

the full filing fee of $350.00. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s amended motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 9) is

DENIED. To proceed with this case, Plaintiff shall submit payment of $350.00 to the clerk of this

court within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of docketing of this order. 

2. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this case be

dismissed.
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of June 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 3:09cv14/RV/EMT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cr-13-RS-EMT

JAMES MICHAEL BEALL

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 

44) and Defendant’s Objections (Doc. 45). The objections have been considered de 

novo.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

approved and incorporated in this Order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (Doc. 32) is 

DENIED.

3. The certificate of appealability is DENIED because defendant 

did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.

ORDERED on April 22, 2014.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cr-00013-RS-EMT Document 46 Filed 04/22/14 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

LINDA KRUGER, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 1:10cv70-MP/WCS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner, Social

Security Administration,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Defendant has moved for reversal of the decision of the Commissioner,

entry of judgment pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and remand of this

cause to the Commissioner. Doc. 14. Plaintiff does not oppose a sentence four

remand and the motion should be granted. A sentence four remand is discretionary,

but requires that the court enter "a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the

decision of the Commissioner." The proper option in this case is to reverse the

Commissioner's decision and remand. Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 111 S.Ct.

2157, 115 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991).
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court GRANT Defendant's motion for

entry of judgment and remand, doc. 13, DIRECT the Clerk to enter final judgment

REVERSING the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits, and REMAND the

application to the Commissioner for rehearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §

405(g) for the purposes stated in the motion.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on October 4, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10

days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections

limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.
Exhibit 32



American Capital Agency Corp.

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



We, Malon Wilkus, Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chairman of the Board of Directors, and John R. Erickson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of American Capital Agency Corp. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                                                                          
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                  |  |    
|Date: May 3, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    MALON
WILKUS                                                      
|                  |  |     |  | Malon Wilkus Chairman of the
Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|                  |  |    
|Date: May 3, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    JOHN R.
ERICKSON                                                  
|                  |  |     |  | John R. Erickson Chief
Financial Officer and Executive Vice President    



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MELVIN SHERROD,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00102-MP-WCS

STANLEY DRATLER, NAN JEFFCOAT, C SIMCOX,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 58, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the motion for summary judgment filed by the Defendants

be granted. The plaintiff did not respond to the motion for summary judgment, and the time for

filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed, and none have been filed. 

Upon consideration, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that the prison doctor

fully examined the plaintiff and considered his requests. The doctor had articulable reasons for

denying the passes. Thus, he was not deliberately indifferent to a serious medical need of

plaintiff. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and

incorporated herein.

2. Summary judgment is granted on behalf of all the defendants in this case and

against the plaintiff. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 4:10-cv-00102-MP-WCS Document 60 Filed 09/22/11 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

p0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146463

AMEENA HAMOOD, f/k/a AMEENA 

BEYDOUN, JOHN A. HAMOOD, RAMONA

HAMOOD, JAMAL JOHN HAMOOD, and

CHARLENE HAMOOD,

Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants- Appellants,

v SC: 146463

COA: 304559

Wayne CC: 99-911949-CH

AL STANOWSKI and JENNY STANOWSKI,

Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 20, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7366
ROBERT TYRONE MORGAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusCOMMISSIONER, Maryland Division of Corrections; WARDEN, Baltimore City Detention Center; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1405-H) Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 20, 1996 Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Tyrone Morgan, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Amy Kushner Kline, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Morgan v. Commissioner , No. CA-96-1405-H (D. Md. Aug. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SCOTT KYLE PETTY, 

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:09cv171-MP-GRJ

WALTER A. MCNEIL, 

Respondent.

 /

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated August 14, 2011. (Doc. 22). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED and a certificate of

appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254

Cases in the U.S. District Courts.

DONE and ORDERED this 18th day of September, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:09-cv-00171-MP-GRJ Document 23 Filed 09/18/12 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-31 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-31 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-31 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-31 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-31 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-31 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-31 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 7