alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Miami Division

Case Number:
10-20994-CIV-MORENO

DANIEL K. GARCIA,
Movant,
vs.
KENNY ATKINSON, WARDEN,

Respondent.
/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
AND TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

THE MATTER was referred to the Honorable Patrick A. White, United States Magistrate

Judge for a Report and Recommendation on Movant Garcia's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

(D.E. No. 1), filed on March 29, 2010. The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation
(D.E. No. 7) on April 7, 2010. The Court has reviewed the entire file and record. The Court has
made a de novo review of the issues that the objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation present and is fully advised in the premises. The Court notes that Garcia's
Objections to the Report and Recommendation (D.E. No. 9), filed on April 21, 2010, relate only to
the merits of the underlying petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and not to the Magistrate
Judge's recommendation that this case be transferred to the Northern District of Florida.
Accordingly, it is

ADJUDGED that United States Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White's Report and

Recommendation (D.E. No. 7) on April 7, 2010 is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. Accordingly, it



is

ADJUDGED that:
(1) that case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Florida. The Clerk of Court shall take all steps necessary to complete the transfer
of this case.

Ll

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida, this ye of April, 2010.

Copies provided to:

United States Magistrate Judge Patrick A. White

Counsel of Record

2-
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Goldrich Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Schara, Chief Executive Officer, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrich Mining Company.







/s/ William Schara

DATE:  November 22, 2010

William Schara, Chief Executive Officer and President





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Goldrich Mining Company and will be retained by Goldrich Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 08-11]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 08-11 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: October 25, 2007. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 61626)          ( print page 61627)          ( print page 61628)          ( print page 61629)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[FR Doc. 07-5399 Filed 10-30-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0423

_________________

STATE OF MONTANA,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

 v.

RICHARD EDWARD ADSIT, JR.,

 Defendant and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Counsel for Appellant Richard Edward Adsit, Jr., has filed a motion for extension 

of time to file the transcripts and to file the opening brief in this matter. Attached to the 

motion is an affidavit from court reporter Diedre Taber requesting an extension of time in 

the Tenth Judicial District Court to file the transcripts. It is not clear whether the affidavit 

was filed, whether it was filed in the District Court within the 40-day time required by

M. R. App. 9, or whether an order was granted. 

The motion for extension to file Appellant’s brief is not properly before this Court, 

as the record in this matter is not complete.

IT IS ORDERED that Appellant until November 25, 2020, within which to file the 

transcripts.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 14 2020

10/14/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0423
# C_2009108EN.01000701.xml

| 12.5.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/7

---

Special Report No 10/2008 ‘EC Development Assistance to Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa’

2009/C 108/05

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 10/2008 ‘EC Development Assistance to Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel.: +352 4398-1 |
| e-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel.: +352 4398-1

e-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lee Costerd, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wolverine
      Exploration Inc. for the period ended November 30, 2009 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Wolverine Exploration Inc.                                                                    

Dated: January 15, 2010



| | /s/
      Less Costerd                                              
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Lee Costerd                                                         
| | Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
      Officer and Director 
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)
| | Wolverine Exploration Inc.                                          



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Wolverine
Exploration Inc. and will be retained by Wolverine Exploration Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
#### INSURANCE CO. v. SURETY CO.

Case below: 1 N.C.App. 9.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 30 April 1968.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cr35-SPM

RALPHY JOSEPH,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR RDAP RECOMMENDATION

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Ralphy Joseph’s letter

requesting that his Presentence Report be amended and that the Court

recommend Defendant for the Residential Drug Abuse Program (“RDAP”). Doc.

81. 

The Presentence Report accurately reflects the position Defendant took

regarding his drug use prior to sentencing. It will therefore not be amended. Nor

will the Court amend Defendant’s sentence to include a recommendation for drug

treatment.

 Based on the information now provided by Defendant, the Bureau of

Prisons can make a determination of whether Defendant should be placed in the

RDAP. The Court makes no recommendation to the Bureau or Prisons for or

Case 4:10-cr-00035-RH-CAS Document 83 Filed 06/01/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

against Defendant’s participation in the RDAP. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: no changes will be made to Defendant’s

PSR and no recommendation for Defendant’s participation in the RDAP will be

made by the Court,.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of June, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 4:10cr35-SPM

Case 4:10-cr-00035-RH-CAS Document 83 Filed 06/01/11 Page 2 of 2
#### STATE v. GRIFFITH

No. 106 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 177.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 13 June 1972.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A1153. CITY OF ATLANTA v. KELVIN LAMAR.

In this personal injury action, Kelvin Lamar sued the City of Atlanta to recover

damages he sustained in a rear-end automobile collision with a City of Atlanta police

officer. The trial court denied the City of Atlanta’s motion for summary judgment,

finding that genuine issues of fact remained as to the officer’s negligence. The City

filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

The denial of a motion for summary judgment must be appealed in accordance

with the interlocutory appeal proceduresset forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b) — including

obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court. See Georgia Central

Credit Union v. Cole, 239 Ga. 870, 870-871 (239 SE2d 37) (1977); Sharpe’s

Appliance Store, Inc. v. Anderson, 161 Ga. App. 112 (289 SE2d 312) (1982);

Lumbermen’s Underwriting Alliance v. Atlantic Wood Indus., 207 Ga. App. 392, 392

(427 SE2d 861) (1993). The City’sfailure to follow the required appellate procedures

deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Pace

Constr. Corp. v. Northpark Assocs., 215 Ga. App. 438, 439 (450 SE2d 828) (1994).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 23, 2021

04/23/2021
NO. 07-06-0241-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	JULY 25, 2007

			______________________________

	TOMMY JOE VASQUEZ, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 121ST DISTRICT COURT OF TERRY COUNTY;

	NO. 5428; HONORABLE KELLY G. MOORE, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Appellant pleaded guilty to the offense of sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to twenty years.  Appellant’s plea was entered after the trial court had overruled a motion to suppress appellant’s written statement.  The trial court certified appellant’s right to appeal the denial of the motion to suppress his written statement.  We affirm.

	Appellant’s attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw.  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967).  In support of his motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in his opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated.  Id. at 744- 45.  In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the trial court’s judgment.  Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response in this matter. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).  The court has also advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response.  Appellant has not filed a response.

	By his Anders brief, counsel raises grounds that could possibly support an appeal, but concludes the appeal is frivolous.  We have reviewed these grounds and made an independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any arguable grounds which might support an appeal.  See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005).  We have found no such arguable grounds and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.

	Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is hereby granted1 and the trial court’s judgment is affirmed.

							Mackey K. Hancock

							        Justice

Do not publish.
# C_2011323EN.01000801.xml

| 8.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 323/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 323/8

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 323/06

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 28.9.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 28.9.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | ANF/8C3411 |
| Species | Anglerfish (Lophiidae) |
| Zone | VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 1080649 |

Date and time of closure

28.9.2011

Duration

28.9.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

ANF/8C3411

Species

Anglerfish (Lophiidae)

Lophiidae

Zone

VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

1080649

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

** **

**Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct 2002**

** **

I,Peter Hills, director of ONO Finance PLC, certify that to the best of myknowledge (i) the Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of ONO Finance PLC.

 
| By:   /s/ Peter Hills |              |
|----------------------------|-------------------|
| **Name:**                  | **Peter  Hills**  |   |
| **Title:**                 | **Director**      |   |
| **Date:**                  | **May 29,  2003** |   |

 

 

2

----
#### STATE v. GAINEY

No. 138 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 682.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1977.
#### STATE v. WOODALL

No. 182 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 192.

Petition by defendán't' for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 July 1979.
# C_2011230EN.01000301.xml

| 5.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/3

---

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2011 under certain quotas opened by the European Union for poultrymeat, eggs and egg albumin

2011/C 230/04

Commission Regulations (EC) No 533/2007 (1), (EC) No 536/2007 (2), (EC) No 539/2007 (3), (EC) No 1384/2007 (4) and (EC) No 1385/2007 (5) opened tariff quotas for imports of poultrymeat, eggs and egg albumin. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of December 2011 for the subperiod 1 July to 30 September 2011 do not, for quotas 09.4068, 09.4070, 09.4169, 09.4015, 09.4402, 09.4091, 09.4092 and 09.4411, cover the quantities available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (6), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 October to 31 December 2011; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.

1

2

3

4

5

6

---

(1)  OJ L 125, 15.5.2007, p. 9.

1

(2)  OJ L 128, 16.5.2007, p. 6.

2

(3)  OJ L 128, 16.5.2007, p. 19.

3

(4)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 40.

4

(5)  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

5

(6)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

6

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2011
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4068 | 2 002 800 |
| 09.4070 | 300 250 |
| 09.4169 | 4 166 250 |
| 09.4015 | 27 000 000 |
| 09.4402 | 2 836 588 |
| 09.4091 | 420 000 |
| 09.4092 | 360 003 |
| 09.4411 | 3 825 000 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2011

(in kg)

09.4068

2 002 800

09.4070

300 250

09.4169

4 166 250

09.4015

27 000 000

09.4402

2 836 588

09.4091

420 000

09.4092

360 003

09.4411

3 825 000

---
NDFL Prob 35

Report and Order Terminating Probation/
(1/92)

Supervised Release
Prior to Original Expiration Date
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Northern District of Florida

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v Crim. No. 1:92CR01012-005
Elijah Williams, Jr.

On July 27, 2007, the above named was placed on Supervised Release for a period of five
years. He has complied with the rules and regulations of Supervised Release and is no longer in need
of Supervised Release. It is accordingly recommended that Elijah Williams, Jr. Be discharged from
Supervised Release.

Reg] lly submitted,

Dennis J. Thomso
US. Probation Officer

ORDER OF THE COURT 9

seh BOP {0\eDeF Int PHO) Bi

Pursuant to the above report, it is ordered that the defendant is discharged from Supervise
Release and that the proceedings in the case be terminated.

Date this G- day of aa 20?

Maurice M. Paul
Senior United States District Judge

REE
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |                         |                       |
|------------------------------|------------------------------|----------------------------|
| Date:      November 16, 2009 | By:                          | /s/ Jodi      Stevens |
|                         | Jodi      Stevens            |
|                         | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                         | Chief      Financial Officer |