alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2374 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2374

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to include a prohibition on 
the listing of a living nonnative species as a threatened species or an 
              endangered species, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2019

  Mr. Cruz (for himself and Mr. Paul) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to include a prohibition on 
the listing of a living nonnative species as a threatened species or an 
              endangered species, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Saving America's Vulnerable and 
Endangered Species Act'' or the ``SAVES Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LISTING OF LIVING NONNATIVE SPECIES AS 
              THREATENED SPECIES OR ENDANGERED SPECIES.

    (a) Limitation.--The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 19. PROHIBITION ON LISTING OF LIVING NONNATIVE SPECIES AS 
              THREATENED SPECIES OR ENDANGERED SPECIES.

    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary shall 
not list under section 4(c) any living nonnative species.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents for the Endangered 
Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. prec. 1531) is amended by inserting 
after the item relating to section 17 the following:

``Sec. 18. Annual cost analysis by the Fish and Wildlife Service.
``Sec. 19. Prohibition on listing of living nonnative species as 
                            threatened species or endangered 
                            species.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-03560-LAK     Document 15      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03560-LAK     Document 15      Filed 07/17/2007     Page 2 of 2
----

----

|                                                        |          |             | Filed in the office ofRoss MillerSecretary of StateState of Nevada | 20110736905-84 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
| Certificate of Amendment(PURSUANT TO NRS 78.385 AND 78.390) |          | 10/13/11 9:55 AM |
|                                                        | E0134732006-8 |
|                                                        |          |             |                                                               |           |

| 1.   | Name of corporation: |
|----------------|----------------------|

| Highland Business Services, Inc. |
|----------------------------------|

| 2.   | The articles have been amended as follows: |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------|

| Article I:The name of the corporation shall be changed from Highland Business Services, Inc., to Elevate, Inc. Article III:The number of shares with a par value: 100,000,000 total authorized shares.Par Value per share: $0.001Number of shares without par value: none |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation entitling them to exercise a least a majority of the voting power or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation* have voted in favor of the amendment is:     61.05% |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | Effective date of filing: (optional) |
|----------------|--------------------------------------|

| 5.   | Signature: (required) |
|----------------|-----------------------|

----

----
# C_2009201EN.01000901.xml

| 26.8.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/9

---

Special Report No 2/2009 ‘The European Union’s Public Health Programme (2003-2007): an effective way to improve health?’

2009/C 201/07

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 2/2009 ‘The European Union’s Public Health Programme (2003-2007): an effective way to improve health?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form at EU-Bookshop.

---
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-31127

Summary Calendar

 

BOBBIE CLARK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. CA-93-1568-K

- - - - - - - - - -

September 18, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff Bobbie Clark appeals the dismissal of his claims

for negligence and unseaworthiness. Having reviewed Clark’s

arguments as well as the trial transcript and exhibits, we

determine that the findings of the district court are not clearly

erroneous. Clark v. United States, No. CA-93-1568-K (E.D. La.

Oct. 11, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Monster
Offers, a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Nate Kaup
------------------
    Nate Kaup
    President/CFO


Date  May 7, 2009
      -----------


<PAGE>
# CE2013227EN.01003802.xml

| 6.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 227/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 227/38

---

Thursday 19 January 2012EU-Georgia Agreement on protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs ***

P7_TA(2012)0004

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 January 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs (09737/2011 – C7-0202/2011– 2011/0090(NLE))

(2013/C 227 E/10)

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament,

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (09737/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (09737/2011),

| — | having regard to the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs (09738/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on protection of geographical indications of agricultural products and foodstuffs (09738/2011),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) and Article 218(7), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0202/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 207(4), first subparagraph and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a)(v) and Article 218(7), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0202/2011),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0450/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0450/2011),

| 1. | Consents to conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Georgia. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Georgia.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Holley Performance
Products Inc. (the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James D. Wiggins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ James D. Wiggins
--------------------
James D. Wiggins
Chief Executive Officer
April 1, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Holley Performance Products Inc. and will be retained by Holley
Performance Products Inc. and furnished to the Security and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

REGIONS BANK,

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No. 3:10cv100/LAC/EMT

THE MOTOR YACHT ROYAL INDULGENCE,

 U.S. Official No. 1110314, her engines, etc., in rem,

AND

DAVID E. GAUDIN and

DANNY L. McCRAY, in personam,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated October 13, 2010 (Doc. 47). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2

2. Regions Bank’s motion for interlocutory sale of the vessel (Doc. 35) is GRANTED. The

“Decree Ordering Sale of Vessel” shall be entered separately and issuance of the “U.S. Marshal’s

Sale of Vessel” is approved. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 4 day of November, 2010. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv100/LAC/EMT
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.10
                                SECOND AMENDMENT

This is the Second Amendment to that certain Employment Contract dated as of
April 1, 1997, between SABAN ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and MARK ITTNER as amended as
of April 1, 1999 (the "Contract").

     1.   Paragraph 1 is amended as follows by adding the following after the
          word "('TERM')"

          "1.  The Term of your employment pursuant to the terms of your
               Contract, as amended, shall continue through December 31, 2002.
               We shall have the irrevocable option to continue the term of your
               employment hereunder through December 31, 2004 by delivering
               written notice to you by June 30, 2002 ('Extended Term')."

     2.   Paragraph 3(a) of the Contract shall be amended as follows:

          "(4) For the period commencing April 1, 2000 and ending June 30, 2000,
               we will pay you a gross annual salary of $255,000.

          (5)  For the period commencing July 1, 2000 and ending December 31,
               2000, we will pay you a gross annual salary of $275,000.

          (6)  For the period commencing January 1, 2001 and ending December 31,
               2001, we will pay you a gross annual salary of $290,000.

          (7)  For the period commencing January 1, 2002 and ending December 31,
               2002, we will pay you a gross annual salary of $310,000.

          (8)  During the first year of the Extended Term, if we have exercised
               our option therefor, we will pay you a gross annual salary of
               $325,000.

          (9)  During the second year of the Extended Term, if we have exercised
               our option therefor, we will pay you a gross annual salary of
               $340,000."

     Paragraph 3(a)(6) of the Contract shall become Paragraph 3(a)(10).
<PAGE>

In all other respects the terms of the Contract shall remain in full force and
effect.

IN WITNESS HEREOF, you and we have entered into this Second Amendment as of
January 1, 2000.

                                             FOX FAMILY WORLDWIDE, INC.



By: /s/ Mark Ittner                          By:  /s/ Jack D. Samuels
   ----------------------------------           --------------------------------
   MARK ITTNER                                  JACK D. SAMUELS
                                             Its: Senior Vice President

                                       2
### NUMBER 13
- 16
- 00 065
- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ YURIE JAH YOUNG , A ppellant ,

v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AU TOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY AS SUBROGEE OF CRYSTAL JENKINS F/K/ A CRYSTAL YOUNG , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 1 1 7th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

_____________________________________________ _______________ 

## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Yurie Jah Young, appealed a judgment entered by the 1 1 7th District
Court of Nueces County, Texas. On January 27, 2016 , the Clerk o f this Court notified appellant that the notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 9.5. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.5. The Clerk directed appellant to file an2

amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within 30 days from the date of
that notice. On March 7, 2016 , the Clerk notified appellant that the defect had not been corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect w as not cured within ten days. To date, the defect has not been corrected, and the deputy clerk

ha s further informed this Court that appellant ha s failed to request and make payment arrangements for the clerk’s record in this cause. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3 , 42.3(b),(c).
On February 12, 2016 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant of the failure to

remit a $ 20 5.00 filing fee. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal if the filing fee was not paid within ten da ys from the date of receipt
of this letter. See id. 42.3(b),(c). The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s failure to

correct the defect and pay the filing fee , is of the opinion that the appeal should be

dismissed. See id. 37.3 , 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for want of prosecution.
PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 14 th day of April, 2016

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Army

          - 32 CFR Part 519

# AGENCY:

Department of the Army, DoD.

# ACTION:

Final rule; removal.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action removes 32 CFR Part 519, Publication of Rules Affecting the Public, published in the                         **Federal Register**                        , August 6, 2004 (69 FR 47766). The rule is being removed because it does not place requirements on the public but merely prescribes procedures for Army proponents to follow for rulemaking and the publishing of items in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# DATES:

Effective November 16, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

U.S. Army Records Management and Declassification Agency, (AAHS-RDR-C), 7701 Telegraph Road, Alexandria, VA 22315-3860.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Brenda Bowen, (703) 428-6422.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Office of the Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Army, is the proponent for the regulation represented in 32 CFR part 519, and has concluded this regulation does not affect the public. The Army is not required to publish matters that are related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of any agency. Therefore, it would be helpful in avoiding confusion with the public if 32 CFR part 519, is removed.

# List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 519

      - Administrative practices and procedures

# PART 519—[REMOVED]

                        Accordingly, for reasons stated in the preamble, under the authority of Sec. 3012, Public Law 84-1028, 70A Stat. 157, (10 U.S.C. 3013); sec. 3, Public Law 79-404, 60 Stat. 238, (5 U.S.C. 552), 32 CFR Part 519,                         *Publication of Rules Affecting the Public*, is removed in its entirety.                    

Brenda S. Bowen,

Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-5682 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

EDDIE M. LEWIS, #154622,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv205-SPM/WCS

JACK CAMPBELL, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

In an order entered on July 7, 2010, Plaintiff was given until July 26, 2010, to

show good cause why the filing fee was not received by the deadline and to show cause

why his case should not be dismissed. Doc. 9. On July 12, 2010, Plaintiff’s copy of that

order was returned to the clerk undelivered. Doc. 10. A check with the Department of

Corrections revealed that the Plaintiff had been transferred to the Northwest Florida

Reception Center in Chipley, Florida. As indicated by docket notation dated July 15,

2010, a copy of the July 7, 2010, order was re-mailed to Plaintiff’s new address. Doc.

11. To date, that order has not been returned undelivered to the Clerk and Plaintiff has

not responded. 
Page 2 of 2

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, this complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

Plaintiff shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by filing a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on August 18, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv205-SPM/WCS