alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001096637
<NAME> GENE CELL, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          28,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         208,561
<DEPRECIATION>                                  97,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,355
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,778
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,841
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,536
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,991
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               528,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (547,742)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (547,742)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (547,742)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.03)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2



I, Ted R. Sharp, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's most recent fiscal quarter (Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

1.

Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys auditors and the audit committee of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's board of directors:

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 12, 2006





By   /s/ Ted R. Sharp

Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer











1
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350


(SECTION
906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of, Rhino Productions, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald G. Brigham,
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
May 14, 2008





By:  /s/ Ronald G.
Brigham


Ronald G.
Brigham


President,


Chief
Executive Officer,


Chief
Financial Officer and Director
# C_2011040EN.01001901.xml

| 9.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 40/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 40/19

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions given at its meeting of 12 June 2008 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.180 — Aluminium fluoride

Rapporteur: Austria

2011/C 40/10

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the facts as an agreement and/or concerted practice within the meaning of Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the facts as an agreement and/or concerted practice within the meaning of Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the product and the geographic area affected by the cartel. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the product and the geographic area affected by the cartel.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment that the cartel constitutes a single and continuous infringement. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment that the cartel constitutes a single and continuous infringement.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment as regards the addressees of the draft decision, specifically with reference to imputation of liability to parent companies of the groups concerned. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment as regards the addressees of the draft decision, specifically with reference to imputation of liability to parent companies of the groups concerned.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the applications made under the 2002 Leniency Notice. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission's assessment of the applications made under the 2002 Leniency Notice.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union.

---
#### STATE v. FOWLER

No. 108 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 116.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 1 February 1972.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KEITH RUSSELL JUDD,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv91-RH/WCS

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 4) and the objections (documents 6 and 7). I have

reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The case is dismissed.” The

clerk must close the file. 

SO ORDERED on April 19, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF KNOLOGY, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the
Company) that, to his knowledge, this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 31, 2005 /s/ Rodger L. JohnsonRodger L. JohnsonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications



We are the Principal Executive Officers and Principal Financial
Officer of Monster Offers, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”). We are delivering this certificate in connection with
the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter year ended June 30, 2012 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
(“Form 10-Q”).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Monster Offers (the “Company”) certifies to his knowledge
that:



|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                               





|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paul Gain                                                  
|Paul Gain                                                      
|Principal Executive Officer                                    
|                                                               
|/s/ Wayne Irving                                               
|Wayne Irving                                                   
|Principal Executive Officer
        Principal Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1
 COMPANYS OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 11) PLC
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the Issuer;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the Issuer; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of Notes for the period between January 1, 2005 and the end of
the Issuers fiscal year on December 31, 2005.
   By:
    
    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:
    
    Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:
    
    Director
 - 29 -
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KELLY D. CUMMINGS,

Appellant,

v.

KENNETH B. HARRELSON,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1305

[December 19, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Kathleen J. Kroll, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2004DR002744.

Carl Domino of the Law Offices of Carl Domino, PLLC, Jupiter, for 

appellant.

Franklin A. Jara of Jara & Associates, P.A., Miami, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Convertible Subordinated Promissory Note Fourth Extension Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED PROMISSORY NOTE MATURITY DATE 
 FOURTH EXTENSION AGREEMENT 
 Whereas, Bioject Medical Technologies Inc., an Oregon corporation (the “Company”), borrowed $508,896 from Life Sciences Opportunities Fund II (Institutional),
L.P. , a Delaware Limited Partnership (the “Lender”), pursuant to that certain Convertible Subordinated Promissory Note, dated as of December 5, 2007(the “Note”); and 
 Whereas, the Maturity Date of the Note was extended from May 15 2009 to July 15, 2009, pursuant to an Extension Agreement dated April 6, 2009, between the
Company and the Lender; the Maturity Date of the Note was further extended from July 15, 2009 to August 15, 2009, pursuant to the Second Extension Agreement dated July 13, 2009, between the Company and the Lender; and the Maturity
Date of the Note was further extended from August 15, 2009 to August 31, 2009, pursuant to the Third Extension Agreement dated August 14, 2009, between the Company and the Lender; 
 Whereas, no principal and interest have been paid to date on the Note; and 
 Whereas, the Company has requested that the Lender extend the Maturity Date of the Note and all principal and interest due thereon to September 15, 2009; 
 For good and valuable consideration, the Company and the Lender agree as follow: 
 The Maturity Date of the Note is hereby
extended to September 15, 2009 and all principal and interest due and payable on the Note shall be due and payable on September 15, 2009 (the “Fourth Extension”). All of the other terms and conditions of the Note, the Convertible
Note Purchase and Warrant Agreement between the Company and the Lender dated as of December 5, 2007, as amended as of December 19, 2007, the Warrant to purchase 67,853 shares of the Company’s Common Stock issued by the Company to the
Lender on December 5, 2007 and the Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and the Lender dated as of December 5, 2007, shall remain in full force and effect and were not and are not amended in any manner by the Extension
Agreement, the Second Extension Agreement, the Third Extension Agreement and this Fourth Extension Agreement. 
 Dated: August 31, 2009 
  

			
	 LIFE SCIENCES OPPORTUNITIES FUND
 II
(INSTITUTIONAL), L.P.

		
	By:	 	 /s/    Al Hansen

		 	Signet Healthcare Partners, LLC, General Partner
		 	Al Hansen, Managing Director

 Bioject Medical Technologies, Inc. 
  

			
	 By:
	 	 /s/    Ralph Makar

		 	Ralph Makar
		 	President and Chief Executive Officer
- Text131: 
    - Text132: 
    - Text133: 
    - Text134:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-6860

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

PATRICK LAMAR HARRIS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District 

Judge. (4:94-cr-00297-CWH-6; 4:07-cv-70075-CWH) 

Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 20, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Patrick Lamar Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince II, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Patrick Lamar Harris seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order filed in his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harris has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Averox Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Dated: October 9, 2007                                  By: /s/ Salman Mahmood
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Salman Mahmood
                                                        Chief Executive Officer


Dated: October 9, 2007                                  By: /s/ Yasser Ahmad
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Yasser Ahmad
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION OF
                      TREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, the undersigned, Samir N. Masri, who is
the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Lincoln International Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2005, (the "Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Sec.13(a) or Sec.15(d) as applicable, of the Securities Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ SAMIR N. MASRI
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Samir N. Masri
                                    Title: Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                    Date:  July 22, 2005
The Football Association Premier League Limited et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al Doc. 118

Dockets.Justia.com
# C_2011249EN.01000901.xml

| 26.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/9

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 249/09

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 18.7.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 18.7.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | The Netherlands |
| Stock or Group of stocks | COD/07D. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | VIId |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

18.7.2011

Duration

18.7.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

The Netherlands

Stock or Group of stocks

COD/07D.

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Gadus morhua

Zone

VIId

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ONSITE HEALTHCARE SERVICES,

INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-112/RS-AK

CASSI LAYNE, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss and/or for a More Definite 

Statement and Motion to Strike (Doc. 11). Plaintiff has not filed a response. N.D. 

Fla. Loc. R. 7.1(C)(1) provides “failure to file a responsive memorandum may be 

sufficient cause to grant the motion.”

IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed without prejudice.

2. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on June 23, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE