alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Heather N.Vinas, President and Principal Executive, certify that:

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2009;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The smallbusiness issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer andhave:

          (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the small business issuer is made known to usby others, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

          (b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused suchinternal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financialreporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes inaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and

          (c)evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

          (d)disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small businessissuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

          (a)all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controlswhich could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          (b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting. 

November 16, 2009
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
November 2, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50538 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLARENCE W. STEINBRECHER,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:00-CR-184-ALL

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Clarence W. Steinbrecher app eals the 30-month sentence he

received following the revocation of his supervised release after

his jury-trial conviction and sentence for failing to file a tax

return, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203. He argues that the

$50,00 0 fine imposed as part of his sentence following his

underlying conviction exceeded the maximum allowed by statute.

Steinbrecher cannot challenge the fine imposed in the originaljudgment in this appeal. C f. United States v. Moody
, 277 F.3d 719,

720-21 (5th Cir. 2001); United States v. Stiefel
, 207 F.3d 256, 259

(5th Cir. 2000). Even if Steinbrecher’s challenge to the $50,000

were reviewable in this proceeding, it is without merit. The fine

imposed by the district court was authorized by law. 18 U.S.C. §

3571(b)(1) & (5), (e); 26 U.S.C. § 7203.

Steinbrecher’s brief also includes several pro se issue s

briefed by Steinbrecher rather than counsel. Although included

with counsel’s brief, co unsel has not adopted these issues.

Steinbrecher does not have a “constitutional right to hybrid

representation.” See United States v. Ogbonna , 184 F.3d 447, 449

n.1 (5th Cir. 1999); see also 5 TH C IR

. R. 28.7 (“Unless specifically

directed by court order, pro se motions, briefs or correspondence

will not be filed if the party is represented by counsel.”). Cf.

Myers v. Johnston
, 76 F.3d 1330, 1335 (5th Cir. 1996) (“when a

criminal appellant accepts the assistance of counsel, but later

objects to his attorney’s appeal strateg y or preparation of the

brief, the criminal appellant cannot then expect to be allowed to

file a supplemental brief. By accepting the assistance of counsel

the criminal defendant waives the right to present pro se briefs on

direct appeal.”). Therefore, we do not consider these issues,

which in any event are frivolous and wholly without merit.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1 - SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION





EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications



I am the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of Your Event,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter year ended November 30, 2013 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form 10-Q’).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Your Event, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies to his
knowledge that:

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                                   





|/s/ Takahito Yasuki                                            
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|Takahito Yasuki                                                
|Principal Executive Officer
        Principal Financial Officer
|                                                               
|January 13, 2014                                               
|Date
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 1 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 2 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 3 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 4 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 5 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 6 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 7 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 8 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 9 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 10 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 11 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 12 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 13 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 14 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 15 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 16 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 17 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 18 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 19 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 20 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 21 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 22 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 23 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 24 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 25 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 26 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 27 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 28 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 29 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 30 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 31 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 32 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 33 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 34 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 35 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 36 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 37 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 38 of 39
Case 1:07-cv-03531-CM-DCF Document 18-2 Filed 06/05/2008 Page 39 of 39
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-20933

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO YANEZ NORIEGA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CR-899-ALL

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Roberto Yanez Noriega appeals his guilty plea conviction and

sentence for being found in the United States after 

deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Noriega

argues that the sentencing provisions in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are

unconstitutional on their face and as applied in his case. He

contends that the unconstitutional portions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326

should be severed from the statute. He asks us to vacate his
No. 02-20933

-2-

conviction and sentence, reform the judgment to reflect a

conviction only under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and remand his case for

resentencing under that provision. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Noriega acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been called

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 489-90

(2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review.

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED. 

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. The Government asks that an

appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries

Z-Tel Communications, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Z-Tel Network Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Z-Tel Business Networks, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Z-Tel, Inc., a Nevada corporation
Z-Tel Holdings, Inc., a Florida corporation
Z-Tel Communications of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia corporation
Touch 1 Communications, Inc., an Alabama corporation
Z-Tel Investments, Inc., a Delaware corporation
DirecTEL, Inc., an Alabama corporation
DirectCONNECT, Inc., an Alabama corporation
Z-Tel Consumer Services, LLC, an Alabama limited liability company
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SERGIO GONZALEZ-VARONA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09CV267-RS/AK

CAPTAIN LEROY MCELROY, et al,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Plaintiff has moved for additional time through January 22, 2010, to file an

amended complaint. (Doc. 9). The motion is GRANTED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of January, 2010.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Trevenex Resources, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Scott Wetzel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                          |                        
|------------------------- | -----------------------
|Dated:  February 13, 2009 | By: /s/ Scott Wetzel   
|                          | Scott Wetzel           
|                          | Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2011306EN.01000801.xml

| 18.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/8

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 306/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 13.8.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 13.8.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | WHG/08. |
| Species | Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) |
| Zone | VIII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 870462 |

Date and time of closure

13.8.2011

Duration

13.8.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

WHG/08.

Species

Whiting (Merlangius merlangus)

Merlangius merlangus

Zone

VIII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

870462

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In
      connection with the accompanying Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of
      United American Corp for the year ended December 31, 2003, I certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





|(1) | the
              Amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of United American Corp for
              the
              year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
              Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | the
              information contained in the Amended Annual Report on 10-KSB/A for
              the
              year ended December 31, 2003, fairly presents in all material respects,
              the financial condition and results of operations of United American
              Corp.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







By:
            /s/
                Simon LamarcheName:
            Simon
                LamarcheTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer,
              Chief
                Financial Officer, DirectorDate:
            May
                1, 2006
#### CARPENTER v. COOKE

No. 510P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 381.

Petition by plaintiffs for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 October 1982. Motion by defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 October 1982.
Loehmann's, Inc.
                             (Debtor-In-Possession)

                           Balance Sheets (Unaudited)


                                                                    AUGUST 26,
                                                                       2000
                                                                   ------------
                                                                  (IN THOUSANDS)

ASSETS
Current assets:
   Cash and cash equivalents                                       $     1,758
   Accounts receivable and other assets                                  3,828
   Merchandise inventory                                                48,276
                                                                   -----------
Total current assets                                                    53,862

Property, equipment and leaseholds, net                                 49,290
Deferred debt issuance costs and other assets, net                         994
Purchase price in excess of net assets acquired, net                    36,241
                                                                   -----------
Total assets                                                       $   140,387
                                                                   ===========

LIABILITIES AND COMMON STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities:
   DIP credit agreement                                            $     6,603
   Accounts payable                                                     13,345
   Accrued expenses                                                     11,089
   Current portion of long-term debt                                     2,450
                                                                   -----------
Total current liabilities                                               33,487


Liabilities subject to compromise                                      144,692

Other noncurrent liabilities                                             3,736

Common stockholders' deficit:
   Common stock                                                             90
   Class B convertible common stock                                        142
   Additional paid-in capital                                           81,760
   Accumulated deficit                                                (123,520)
                                                                   -----------
Total common stockholders' deficit                                     (41,528)
                                                                   -----------
Total liabilities and common stockholders' deficit                 $   140,387
                                                                   ===========