alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2423 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for purposes of the tax 

on private foundation excess business holdings to treat as outstanding 

any employee-owned stock purchased by a business enterprise pursuant 

to certain employee stock ownership retirement plans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 1, 2019 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 for purposes 

of the tax on private foundation excess business holdings 

to treat as outstanding any employee-owned stock purchased by a business enterprise pursuant to certain employee stock ownership retirement plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2423 IS

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PURCHASES OF EMPLOYEE-OWNED 

2 STOCK DISREGARDED FOR PURPOSES OF 

3 FOUNDATION TAX ON EXCESS BUSINESS 

4 HOLDINGS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4943(c)(4)(A) of the In6 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(v) For purposes of clause (i), subpara9 graph (D), and paragraph (2), any voting stock 

10 which— 

11 ‘‘(I) is not readily tradable on an es12 tablished securities market, 

13 ‘‘(II) is purchased by the business en14 terprise on or after January 1, 2005, from 

15 an employee stock ownership plan (as de16 fined in section 4975(e)(7)) in which em17 ployees of such business enterprise partici18 pate, in connection with a distribution 

19 from such plan, and 

20 ‘‘(III) is held by the business enter21 prise as treasury stock, cancelled, or re22 tired, 

23 shall be treated as outstanding voting stock, but 

24 only to the extent so treating such stock would 

25 not result in permitted holdings exceeding 49 

26 percent (determined without regard to this 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2423 IS

1 clause). The preceding sentence shall not apply 

2 with respect to the purchase of stock from a 

3 plan during the 10-year period beginning on the 

4 date the plan is established.’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply to taxable years ending after 

8 the date of the enactment of this Act and to pur9 chases by a business enterprise of voting stock in 

10 taxable years beginning before, on, or after the date 

11 of the enactment of this Act. 

12 (2) SPECIAL RULE FOR GRANDFATHERED

13 FOUNDATIONS IN CASE OF DECREASE IN OWNER14 SHIP BY REASON OF PRE-ENACTMENT PUR15 CHASES.—Section 4943(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Internal 

16 Revenue Code of 1986 shall not apply with respect 

17 to any decrease in the percentage of holdings in a 

18 business enterprise by reason of the application of 

19 section 4943(c)(4)(A)(v) of such Code (as added by 

20 this section). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 11

### CFR Correction

In Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1 to 59, revised as of January 1, 2007, on page 27, reinstate § 11.71 to read as follows:

§ 11.71

(a) You must include the following information in your petition for rulemaking: 

(1) Your name and mailing address and, if you wish, other contact information such as a fax number, telephone number, or e-mail address. 

(2) An explanation of your proposed action and its purpose. 

(3) The language you propose for a new or amended rule, or the language you would remove from a current rule. 

(4) An explanation of why your proposed action would be in the public interest. 

(5) Information and arguments that support your proposed action, including relevant technical and scientific data available to you. 

(6) Any specific facts or circumstances that support or demonstrate the need for the action you propose. 

(b) In the process of considering your petition, we may ask that you provide information or data available to you about the following: 

(1) The costs and benefits of your proposed action to society in general, and identifiable groups within society in particular. 

(2) The regulatory burden of your proposed action on small businesses, small organizations, small governmental jurisdictions, and Indian tribes. 

(3) The recordkeeping and reporting burdens of your proposed action and whom the burdens would affect. 

(4) The effect of your proposed action on the quality of the natural and social environments. 

[FR Doc. 07-55525 Filed 12-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WILLIE STRAWDER, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00068-MP-GRJ

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 23, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, be

affirmed. The plaintiff filed objections, Doc. 24, as amended by Doc. 25, and the Court has

made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which

objection was made, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). 

Upon consideration, the Court agrees that substantial evidence supports the conclusion

that plaintiff does not exhibit any sort of additional physical or mental impairment which would

impose an additional and significant work-related limitation of function or any shortcomings in

adaptive functioning which are necessary to meet the requirements for Listing 12.05C. A further

IQ test would not have made a difference because Plaintiff did not satisfy the other criteria of

Listing 12.05C. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and incorporated

herein. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is affirmed. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00068-MP-GRJ Document 26 Filed 10/21/11 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARCUS ANTHONY MARTINEZ,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00058

- CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court Number Three

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC#1212239D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2014.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
Exhibit 31.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Christine M. Applegate, certify that:  1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-Q of Porfavor, Inc.;  2.           Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.           The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.           The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  November 11, 2008    By:  /s/ Christine M. Applegate Christine M. Applegate CFO, Controller, Treasurer, Secretary, Director
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LARRY W. HAND,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv49/RS-EMT

GULF POWER COMPANY,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s notice of settlement (Doc. 30). Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 

16.2(D), IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed from the active docket of the court.

2. In the event that the settlement between these parties is not consummated, the 

Court reserves jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days 

of the date of this Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and 

reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file for administrative purposes, and upon the 

expiration of 60 days without activity, the clerk is directed to close the case in 

its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on October 15, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1 - Principal Executive Officer Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
Your Event, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering
this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarter ended February 28, 2010 and filed with the U. S. Securities and
Exchange Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the amended Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in the amended Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


   /s/ Marilyn Montgomery
----------------------------------
       Marilyn Montgomery
Its:   Principal Executive Officer
       Principal Financial Officer



Date  April 9, 2010
      -------------


<PAGE>
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 22 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 22 Filed 06/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 1 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 2 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 3 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 4 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 5 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 6 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 7 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 8 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 9 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 10 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 11 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 12 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 13 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 14 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 15 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 16 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 17 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 18 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 19 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 20 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 21 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 22 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 23 of 24Case 3:09-cv-00570-MCR-CJK Document 61 Filed 11/29/12 Page 24 of 24
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Quadra Projects Inc. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Claude Diedrick, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|   



|/s/ Claude DiedrickClaude Diedrick
|----------------------------------



|President, Chief Executive Officer, ChiefFinancial Officer, Treasurer and DirectorDate: October 18, 2010
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                        MAY-3-1997
<PERIOD-END>                          AUG-2-1997
<CASH>                                     1,268
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                              7,436
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                               64,159
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          72,863
<PP&E>                                   138,561
<DEPRECIATION>                          (69,860)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           185,207
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     40,936
<BONDS>                                   95,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      89
<OTHER-SE>                                21,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             185,207
<SALES>                                   95,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          95,292
<CGS>                                     69,671
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          24,393
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (4,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (4,587)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                             (4,587)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (0.51)
        

</TABLE>
#### IN RE HACKETT

No. 3 PC.

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 501.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1979.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF. ?EiAS _: 

AUSTIN ,’ ;. ., _” 

OIOYII SIL‘Im* 1 : 

rr?-ovt”rr cc;r”rr i 

&nornble John DrMson " i '/. .." 

County dtorney, S&n Patriofb County 

': : 

sinton, Texas. ' .' ., '. 

Dear Sir: ,'~ 

, 

: 

RI am o&&r A 

3rtiole 5949 tt 

f 

Texas, as a,? nd 

ion from yo r b&i 

statutes Of 

la pp~e+kte an opin-. + ~ ,~ 

lov~s"2' viaa corn- ., " 

hortiy'after the " 

tern of suoh appoint- 

~A* duly qualified"' ..' 

since such tiae. 

who WRS then 

to use her ~. >' 

CLvil Statutes of Texas, 3s amended, I an somewhat 

at a lost as to how to advise her. I w0uia be in- .,~ 

q?Lired to aUvise her it would be prsper to continue 

the use of her i&den nn.me in toking acknowledgements 

vzcre it not for an early Texns Supreme Court ruling 

thnt the 13w bestows 3 husband's name upon 3 wiUe, 

and she should be sued, 3rd prooese against hart 

should run in her husband's namB. Furthermore, she 

does not desire to use her aeiden ndme." 

. . 
1'75 

Honorable John D~WEKUA,~ page 2 : 

After carefully reviewing, the stat&a 

‘. decisions of the appellate oourts of this $tate, 

‘ti, find any statute .or deolslon by the appellate 

ing upon the question under oonslderation. 

and various 

we have failed 

oourta touohThe identical question presented in your inquiry has 

been before this department on various occasions, ana in an 

opinion oi this dc?a- +ment ti-#- written February 23, 1937, Book 375, 

Page 316, Letter Opinions of this department, it was held that 

when a single wonan was appointed and qualified as a notary pub? 

UC, and later nmrled, she should oontinue to use her maiden 

IUWJ and not her marriet! name, when aoting’as a notary public. 

1% ‘another dplnicm, this department held that when a 

single woiam .was appotited and qualified as a notary publio, 

and later xcarried, she should use her maiden name and add the 

surname of her husband when acting ,a8 a notary publlo. ‘(Letter 

Opinions of the Attorney General’s Dopartnent, Book 367, Page 970) 

k rspmsentative ‘of the ,8eoretarp of.‘State has inrormsd us that it htie baen tiic polioy or said office to permit 

a sin&e m-man who wa6’ appointed and qualified as a notary public, won her axirria~e ,’ to continue’ to act-as a. notary public ,~ 

under her miden name. It is also t33 polloy of the Secretary 

or 5tete to permit .a sin&e woman who has Keen appointed and quailried as a notary public, upon her marrlace, to qualify under her 

married nam, and a new commission Is issued accordingly. The 

beoretary of State oharges no fee for the new oomission. 

St IS’ our opitilon that ~when a single vro~a who has 

been appointed and qualified as a notary publio, and iater marries, 

can qualify and act as a notary publio under her married name by 

followtig the procedure prescribed by the Seoretarg of State. It 

is our further opinion:that as a’ioatter of preoaution sb8 should 

so qualify aster her mrriage. 

Forms of certificates ozm be secured from the Seoretary 

Oi State for the pUrp0k~ Or QWuiyiAg undor her married naae, 

Yours very truly, 

ATTOiW3Y G>NXRAL OF TZZAS 

By,WdA 

. . .‘Arde$l Williams 

:
#### CONSTRUCTION CO. v. HOLIDAY INNS

No. 114 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 475.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 July 1972.