alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Charles B. Keffer, :

Petitioners :

:

v. : No. 111 0 C.D. 2022

:

Colfax Corpor ation and Phoenix

, :

Insurance Company (Workers ’ :

Compensation Appeal Board) :

Respondent :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day 6 th of November 2023, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that the above

- captioned opinion filed A ugust 11 , 2023, shall be designated

OPINION rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION and it shall be reported.

__________________________________ ELLEN CEISLER , J udge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DAISY SHARON, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-198/RS-MD

SHERRYLE GIVENS, PETER GIVENS,

RICHARD GIVENS, GEICO GENERAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY, and STATE

FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

UORDER

The relief requested in Defendant Peter Givens’ Consent Motion for Leave to 

Appear at Mediation by Telephone (Doc. 33) is granted. 

ORDERED on September 10, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RED MOUNTAIN BANK, N.A.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-100/RS/MD

EMERALD COAST CAR WASH, 

LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested by Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion to Drop Party from 

Action (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. The unknown person or entity in possession of 

22431 Panama City Beach Parkway is dropped from this action.

ORDERED on July 8, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TIMOTHY CLIFTON,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-154/RS-CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27). No 

objections have been filed. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated 

by reference in this Order. 

2. The application for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (Docs. 

24 & 25) are GRANTED in the amount of $4,250.00. 

3. The Commissioner is ordered to pay that amount to Plaintiff’s counsel. The 

Commissioner will follow Astrue v. Ratliff, but make prompt payment of the 

amount due, as no showing of outstanding federal debt has been made to date. 

4. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

Case 5:10-cv-00154-RS-CJK Document 28 Filed 02/27/12 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED on February 27, 2012.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00154-RS-CJK Document 28 Filed 02/27/12 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration for Children and Families

Notice is hereby given that I have redelegated to the Regional Program Managers, Office of Child Support Enforcement, the following authority vested in me by the Assistant Secretary for Children and Families in the memorandum dated February 16, 2007.

(a) Authority Delegated.

1. The authority to serve as the Approving Official to sign audit determination letters only where resolution does not involve a cost disallowance.

(b) Limitations.

1. This redelegation shall be exercised under financial and administrative requirements applicable to all Administration for Children and Familites authorities.

2. This authority may not be redelegated.

(c) Effective Date.

This redelegation is effective upon the date of signature.

(d) Effect on Existing Delegations.

None.

I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by any Regional Program Manager which, in effect, involved the exercise of this authority prior to the effective date of this redelegation.

Dated: August 14, 2007. 

Margot Bean,

Deputy Director/Commissioner, Office of Child Support Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 07-4885 Filed 10-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
#### IN RE N.C.N.B.

No. 243 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 353.

Petition by N.C. National Bank for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION   I, Richard R. Walters, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  November 13, 2007  By:   /s/ Richard R. Walters Richard R. Walters, President, Principal Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.     1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ABDUL KHALIQ ALANSARI,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv106-SPM/WCS

CASH COW, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s amended

report and recommendation dated October 19, 2010 (doc. 21). The parties have

been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the

report and recommendation, I have determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as

follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 21) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal (doc.20) is granted.

3. This case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Plaintiff’s
Page 2 of 2

motion and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of November, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 4:10cv106-SPM/WCS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                                    Mar-31-1998 
<CASH>                                            7,785,029 
<SECURITIES>                                              0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                     8,685,598 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        396,157 
<INVENTORY>                                               0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 18,392,935 
<PP&E>                                            1,499,426 
<DEPRECIATION>                                    1,287,557 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   25,352,687 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            12,431,786 
<BONDS>                                                   0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0 
<PREFERRED>                                               0 
<COMMON>                                             29,448 
<OTHER-SE>                                       12,377,594 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     25,352,687 
<SALES>                                                   0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,403,378 
<CGS>                                                     0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     488,303 
<INCOME-TAX>                                        210,000 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 278,303 
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0 
<CHANGES>                                                 0 
<NET-INCOME>                                        278,303 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.09 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.08 
                                                            
                                                            

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. HARRIS

No. 476P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 239.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MYLES N. STOKES,

Petitioner,

vs. 3:09cv338/WS/MD

 

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

O R D E R

Petitioner has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (doc.

1) and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 4). 

A review of the petitioner’s inmate trust account statement shows that although at

the time of filing his petition the petitioner had a $0.12 balance in his account, his average

monthly balance for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his petition

was $93.18. As the filing fee for a petition for writ of habeas corpus is only $5.00,

petitioner will be required to pay the fee.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 4) is DENIED.

2. Petitioner shall submit a payment of $5.00 to the clerk of this court within

THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this order. The check should be made payable to

“Clerk, U. S. District Court.” Failure of petitioner to either submit this amount or explain his

inability to do so may result in a recommendation to the District Court that this case be

dismissed. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 28 day of September, 2009.

th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
#### STATE v. ANDREWS

No. 16.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 662.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 1 August 1972.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00153-MP-AK

ROSEMARY BARKETT, SUSAN H BLACK, PHILIP WAYNE EDWARDS, STEPHAN P

MICKLE, WILLIAM C SHERRILL, JR,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Motion for Injunction by Randall Lamont Rolle, Doc.

10. Mr. Rolle’s complaint was dismissed on June 15, 2010, for failure to state a claim upon

which relief may be granted and as barred by absolute immunity, Doc. 8. Now comes Mr. Rolle

to request “an injunction ordering an evidentiary hearing and declaring unconstitutional the

procedure used to deny Plaintiff relief.” Because this action has already been dismissed, this

motion cannot be heard and must also be dismissed. To the extent this motion should be

construed as a motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59, it is denied. 

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Motion for Injunction, Doc. 10, is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of June, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SHAN L. ZIRLOTT,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-164/RS/CJK

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. 

_________________________________________ /

UORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 24). No 

objections have been filed. 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order. 

2. The applications for supplemental security income and disability insurance are 

denied. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

ORDERED on September 27, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00164-RS-CJK Document 25 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 1
NO. 03-15-00078-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS, 

AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

CHRIS BELL, 

Appellant

v.

REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION,

Appellee.

On appeal from the 261st Judicial District Court, Travis County

Honorable Judge Dietz Presiding

AGREED MOTION TO DISMISS

HUSH BLACKWELL LLP HANCE SCARBOROUGH, LLP 

Elizabeth G. Bloch Terry L. Scarborough

State Bar No. 02495500 State Bar No. 17716000

Heidi.bloch@huschblackwell.com TScarborough@hslawmail.com 

Thomas H. Watkins V. Blayre Pena 

State Bar No. 20928000 State Bar No. 24050372 

Tom.watkins@huschblackwell.com BPena@hslawmail.com 

111 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400 400 W. 15th Street, Ste. 950 

Austin, TX 78701 Austin, TX 78701 

Telephone: (512) 472-5456 Telephone: (512) 479-8888

Facsimile: (512) 479-1101 Facsimile: (512) 482-6891

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

CHRIS BELL REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS

ASSOCIATION

ACCEPTED

03-15-00078-CV

5893236

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/1/2015 9:42:03 AM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/1/2015 9:42:03 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
PAGE 2

TO THE HONORABLE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS:

Appellant, Chris Bell, files this Agreed Motion to Dismiss, and respectfully 

shows the Court as follows:

1. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(2), Appellant Chris

Bell and Appellee Republican Governors Association voluntarily ask the

Court to dismiss this Appeal.

2. The Parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement.

3. The Parties further request that the Court order each party pay the costs of the

appeal incurred by that party.

For the foregoing reasons, the Parties respectfully request that this Court

dismiss this appeal.

Respectfully submitted, 

HUSCH BLACKWELL, L.L.P 

111 Congress Avenue, Suite 1400 

Austin, Texas 78701 

(512) 472-5456 

(512) 479-1101 (facsimile) 

BY:/s/ Elizabeth G. Bloch 

ELIZABETH G. BLOCH 

Texas Bar No. 02495500 

Heidi.bloch@huschblackwell.com 

THOMAS H.WATKINS 

Texas Bar No. 20928000 

tom.watkins@huschblackwell.com 

Attorneys for Appellant Chris Bell 
PAGE 3

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

The undersigned certifies that she has consulted with Terry L. Scarborough, 

counsel for Appellee, and he has indicated that Appellee is not opposed to this 

motion. 

/s/ Elizabeth G. Bloch 

Elizabeth G. Bloch

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing instrument has been 

served upon the following counsel of record via electronic filing and/or facsimile 

on the 1st day of July, 2015: 

Terry L. Scarborough 

Hance Scarborough, LLP 

400 W. 15th Street, Ste. 950

Austin, Texas 78701

(512) 482-6891 (facsimile) 

/s/ Elizabeth G. Bloch 

Elizabeth G. Bloch
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STATE OF FLORIDA, by and

through Bill McCollum, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER

On June 14, 2010, I entered an order noting that the court had received

numerous inquires from “organizations and individuals” expressing an interest in

filing amicus curiae briefs in this important case. After acknowledging that there

might conceivably be helpful contributions from amici, I set forth an orderly

procedure for providing an opportunity to do so. But, I concluded that amicus briefs

would not be allowed at the motion to dismiss stage. Now pending before the court

are motions from three state Attorneys General (doc. 57), and four state governors

(doc. 59), all of whom seek to participate as “state amici” and file briefs in support

of the defendants’ motion to dismiss.1 

After reading their motions, it appears that the proposed state amici might

have positions and arguments that may be helpful to the court during the meritsphase of this case. However, it does not appear that they have anything especially

1

 In addition to seeking leave to file their brief, the Attorneys General seek

clarification as to whether such state actors fall under the phrase “organizations

and individuals.” They do.

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 62 Filed 06/25/10 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

useful to add at the motion to dismiss stage, which is concerned primarily with

discrete legal issues such as standing and ripeness.

Accordingly, these motions (docs. 57 and 59) are both DENIED, but with

leave to renew them if the case survives dismissal.

DONE and ORDERED this 25th day of June, 2010.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case No.: 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 62 Filed 06/25/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of EXPLORE ANYWHERE HOLIDNG CORP. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Gerlib, Interim CEO (Principal Executive Officer) and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: January 19, 2011








By: /s/ William Gerlib Name: William Gerlib


Title: Interim CEO (Principal Executive Officer) and Director
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

________________________________________________________________________

MARIA PARSONS and MICHAEL PARSONS,

MARY ANN JONES and JAMES ARTHUR JONES, SR.,

SHANTELL SHAMEA JONES, Individually,

and as the Parent and Natural Guardian of

CARLOS UDAE STEPHENSON, AARON JONES STEPHENSON,

and OZIAH CARSON JONES, Minor Children,

SANDRA WATTS KENNEDY and KEVIN KENNEDY,

Individually, and as the Parents and Natural Guardians

of MURIELLE KEELY KENNEDY, a Minor Child; and

FARINDA OSTEEN, all individually and

on Behalf of a Class of Persons who are Similarly Situated,

 Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO.: 1:10-cv-00071-MP-GRJ

KOPPERS INC. f/k/a

KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INC., 

BEAZER EAST, INC., f/k/a KOPPERS

COMPANY, INC.,

 Defendants.

_______________________________________________________________________

PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNT VII OF THEIR 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

_______________________________________________________________

Plaintiffs hereby give notice that they withdraw Count VII of their Amended 

Complaint against all Defendants. All other Counts in Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint 

remain.

Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/ Ervin A. Gonzalez

Ervin A. Gonzalez 

Florida Bar Number 500720

Patrick S. Montoya

Florida Bar Number 0524441

COLSON HICKS EIDSON

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse

Coral Gables, Florida 33134

Telephone: (305) 476-7400

Facsimile: (305) 476-7444

Case 1:10-cv-00071-MP -GRJ Document 60 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 2
Parsons, et. al. v. Koppers, Inc., et. al.

Case No.: 1:10-cv-00071-MP-GRJ

Plaintiffs’ Notice of Withdrawal of Count VII of their Amended Complaint

Colson Hicks Eidson Colson Matthews Martínez Gonzalez Kalbac & Kane

255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse, Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Telephone: (305) 476-7400 Fax: (305) 476-7444 2

Email: Ervin@colson.com

Email: Patrick@colson.com

Jordan L. Chaikin

Florida Bar Number 0878421

PARKER WAICHMAN ALONSO LLP

3301 Bonita Beach Road, Suite 101

Bonita Springs, Florida 34134

Telephone: (239) 390-1000

Facsimile: (239) 390-0055

Email: jchaikin@yourlawyer.com

Matthew McCauley 

Peter J. Cambs 

PARKER WAICHMAN ALONSO LLP

6 Harbor Park Drive

Port Washington, New York 11050-4647

Telephone: (516) 466-6500

Facsimile: (516) 466-6665

Email: mmccauley@yourlawyer.com

Email: pcambs@yourlawyer.com

Stuart Calwell

Thomas Rodd

THE CALWELL PRACTICE, PLLC

Law & Arts Center West

500 Randolph Street

Charleston, WV 25302

Tel: (Toll Free): (800) 876-5529

Tel: (Local): (304) 343-4323

Fax: (304) 344-3684

Email: scalwell@calwelllaw.com

Email: trodd@calwelllaw.com

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been 

electronically filed with the Clerk of Court this 2

st day of December 2010, by using the 

CM/ECF system which will send notice of electronic filing to all parties of record.

Case 1:10-cv-00071-MP -GRJ Document 60 Filed 12/02/10 Page 2 of 2