alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009037EN.01000701.xml

| 14.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 February 2009

(2009/C 37/04)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2823 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4524 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88415 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7455 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,4931 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,719 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,56 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,22 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7071 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,643 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3005 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,113 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9404 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5833 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9411 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4325 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9334 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 801,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,7845 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,7626 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4355 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 195,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6221 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 60,35 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,4395 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,977 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9137 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3946 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 62,095 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2823

JPY

Japanese yen

117,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4524

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88415

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7455

CHF

Swiss franc

1,4931

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,719

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

28,56

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,22

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7071

PLN

Polish zloty

4,643

RON

Romanian leu

4,3005

TRY

Turkish lira

2,113

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9404

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5833

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9411

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4325

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9334

KRW

South Korean won

1 801,31

ZAR

South African rand

12,7845

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,7626

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4355

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 195,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6221

PHP

Philippine peso

60,35

RUB

Russian rouble

44,4395

THB

Thai baht

44,977

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9137

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3946

INR

Indian rupee

62,095

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2311 

To expand eligibility for the My Career Advancement Account program of 

the Department of Defense to certain military spouses, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2019 

Mr. BOOKER (for himself and Ms. MCSALLY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To expand eligibility for the My Career Advancement Account program of the Department of Defense to certain 

military spouses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spouse Employment 

5 Reciprocity and Vocational Instruction for Career En6 hancement Act of 2019’’ or the ‘‘SERVICE Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2311 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR THE MY CAREER 

2 ADVANCEMENT ACCOUNT PROGRAM TO CER3 TAIN MILITARY SPOUSES. 

4 (a) ELIGIBILITY FOR PARTICIPANTS WHOSE

5 SPOUSES RECEIVE PROMOTIONS.—A military spouse who 

6 is participating in the My Career Advancement Account 

7 program of the Department of Defense (in this section re8 ferred to as the ‘‘Program’’) may not become ineligible 

9 for the Program solely because the member of the Armed 

10 Forces to whom the military spouse is married receives 

11 a promotion in grade. 

12 (b) REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary 

14 of Defense shall submit to Congress a report regarding 

15 the Program. The report shall include the following: 

16 (1) An assessment of employment rates for 

17 military spouses that identifies— 

18 (A) the career fields most military spouses 

19 frequently pursue; and 

20 (B) the extent to which such rates may be 

21 improved by expanding the Program to include 

22 reimbursements for licensing reciprocity. 

23 (2) An assessment of costs required to expand 

24 the Program as described in paragraph (1)(B). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7409** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. PAUL AL O NZO EWING , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern D istrict of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Jerome B. Friedman, Senior District Judge. ( 2:09

- cr - 00083

- JBF

- TEM

- 1; 2:10

- cv - 00330

- JBF )

Submitted : January 28, 2011 Decided: February 9 , 2011

Before KING and AGEE , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judg e .
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Michael Lorraine Donner, Sr., HUBBARD, TERRY & BRITT, PC, Irvington, Virginia, for Appellant . Melissa Elaine O’Boyle, Assistant United States Attorney, Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Paul Alonzo Ewing seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S .C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and t hat the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ewing has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appea lability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00365-CV

LAWRENCE MAURICE HILL APPELLANT

V.

PENNYMAC HOLDINGS, LLC & 

STANFORD KURLAND

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 096-288693-16

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On November 15, 2017, and February 6, 2018, we notified appellant in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless the $205 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellant has not paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015,

2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: KERR, PITTMAN, and BIRDWELL, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 15, 2018

 2See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil 

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District 

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’

fees).
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 32 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
# CA2009042EN.01000101.xml

| 20.2.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 42/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 42/1

---

RESERVE LISTS

   (1)

RESERVE LISTS

(1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/100/07

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/100/07

LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS (AD 5)

LINGUISTIC ADMINISTRATORS (AD 5)

having English as their main language in the field of translation

(2009/C 42 A/01)

Option 1

| ANDERSON | Marnie |
| --- | --- |
| FORSYTH | Angus |
| KEYS | Alexander Thomas |
| STRICKLAND-McGECHAN | Flora |
| TOBER | Lucy |
| TOMREN | Lene Anita |

ANDERSON

Marnie

FORSYTH

Angus

KEYS

Alexander Thomas

STRICKLAND-McGECHAN

Flora

TOBER

Lucy

TOMREN

Lene Anita

Option 2

Merit group 1

| ABRAHAM | Zachary |
| --- | --- |
| GIBBON | Nicola |
| HEAVEY | Nigel James |
| KIRK | Timothy |
| LEESON | Rachel |
| MOISER | Tama |
| MURRAY | Neil |
| RUSSELL | Martin |
| SMITH | Francis |

ABRAHAM

Zachary

GIBBON

Nicola

HEAVEY

Nigel James

KIRK

Timothy

LEESON

Rachel

MOISER

Tama

MURRAY

Neil

RUSSELL

Martin

SMITH

Francis

Merit group 2

| ACKERMAN | Lisa |
| --- | --- |
| BRASOVEANU | Mihai Cristian |
| CHANDELIER | Claire |
| CLOUGH | Elizabeth |
| DAWS | Alexandra |
| IRELAND | James |
| TENCH | Michelle |
| URQUHART | Fiona |
| VAN LIEROP | Christiaan |

ACKERMAN

Lisa

BRASOVEANU

Mihai Cristian

CHANDELIER

Claire

CLOUGH

Elizabeth

DAWS

Alexandra

IRELAND

James

TENCH

Michelle

URQUHART

Fiona

VAN LIEROP

Christiaan

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2010 and may be extended.

31 December 2010

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the President's Cancer Panel, October 22, 2007, 8 a.m. to October 22, 2007, 6:30 p.m., Hyatt Regency La Jolla, 3777 La Jolla Village Drive, San Diego, CA 92122 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 26, 2007, 72 FR 54667.                

This meeting is being amended to reschedule the closed session to Tuesday, October 30, 2007, 2 p.m.-4 p.m., as a telephone conference. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 5, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5093 Filed 10-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### STATE v. RICHARDSON

No. 553PA82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 822.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 October 1982.
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-9      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 1 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-9      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 2 of 3

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 28-9      Filed 05/30/2008     Page 3 of 3
# C_2011090EN.01000401.xml

| 22.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/4

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to which measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 apply

2011/C 90/04

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annexes I to V to Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP (1) as amended by Council Decision 2011/69/CFSP (2) and in Annexes I and II to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 (3) amending Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 (4).

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the above mentioned Annexes should be included in the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/639/CFSP as amended by Council Decision 2011/69/CFSP and in Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 84/2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above mentioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| TEFS Coordination |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

TEFS Coordination

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 18.

1

(2)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 40.

2

(3)  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 17.

3

(4)  OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1.

4

---
Exhibit 10.2


 


	 	


 

201 Isabella
Street

Pittsburgh,
PA 15212

  






 






April 8, 2020


 





Erick R. Asmussen





c/o Arconic Corporation





201 Isabella Street





Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212





 


Dear Erick:





 


This letter memorializes our recent discussions
regarding our collective response to the COVID-19 pandemic and its dramatic impact on our community, our economy, and Arconic Corporation
(the “Company”).





 


You have voluntarily agreed, during the
Salary Reduction Period (as defined below), to reduce your rate of base salary by 20% from your rate of base salary (your “Regular
Salary”) set forth in the letter agreement between Arconic Inc. and you, dated January 29, 2020 (the “Letter
Agreement”). The “Salary Reduction Period” shall mean the period commencing on April 16, 2020 and
concluding on December 31, 2020 (or such earlier date as the Company determines to conclude the Salary Reduction Period for other
salaried employees). Notwithstanding the foregoing, for all purposes of the Company’s employee benefit plans, including,
without limitation, the Company’s Executive Severance Plan and the Company’s Change in Control Severance Plan, determinations
made by reference to your annual base salary shall be based on your Regular Salary, without regard to the temporary reduction contemplated
hereby. In recognition of the challenges under which the economy is currently operating, the reference to September 30, 2020 in
the “Relocation” paragraph of the Letter Agreement is hereby modified to refer to the later of September 30, 2020 or
the 60th day following the conclusion of the Salary Reduction Period.


 





Except as modified
hereby, the Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. The section of the Letter Agreement entitled “Governing
Law; Jurisdiction” shall apply to this letter as if set forth herein, mutatis mutandis.


 


Please indicate your
agreement to the foregoing by your signature below.


 


Best Regards,


 


 


	By: 	/s/ William F. Austen	
	Name: 	William F. Austen	 
	Title:	Chair, Compensation and Benefits Committee

                                           Arconic Corporation
	 





  


	Acknowledged and Agreed:	 	Date:	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Erick R. Asmussen	 	 04/08/2020	 
	Erick R. Asmussen
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Syngas International
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: April 10, 2007 | /s/ Wilf Ouellette                           
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------------
|                      | Wilf Ouellette                               
|                      | Director, President, Chief Executive Officer,
|                      | and Chief Financial Officer                  

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MICHAEL PATE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv223/MCR/EMT

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated December 16, 2010 (Doc. 42). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s “Motion for the Court to Approve Stipulation” (Doc. 32), is 

GRANTED, to the extent the current discovery plan is modified as follows:

a. Plaintiff’s Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures are due by December 31, 2010.

b Defendant’s Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures are due by January 14, 2011.

c. The deadline to join additional parties and amend pleadings is January 25,

2011. 

d. Plaintiff’s rebuttal Rule 26(a)(2) disclosures are due by January 28, 2011.

e. The parties shall select a mediator by February 1, 2011.
Page 2 of 2

f. The discovery deadline is extended to February 16, 2011. 

g. The deadline for filing potentially dispositive motions is March 8, 2011. 

h. The deadline for commencing mediation is March 31, 2011.

i. The deadline for completing mediation is April 4, 2011.

j. In all other respects, the Initial Scheduling Order (Doc. 7), as modified by the 

Final Scheduling and Trial Order and Mediation Referral (Doc. 20), shall continue to control.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of December, 2010.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cv223/MCR/EMT
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 217 (Friday, November 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63547-63548]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5607]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Foreign Agricultural Service

Reestablishment of the Edward R. Madigan United States 
Agricultural Export Excellence Award Board of Evaluators

AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice to reestablish board of evaluators.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Secretary of Agriculture has 
reestablished the Edward R. Madigan United States Agricultural Export 
Excellence Award Board of Evaluators. The Secretary of Agriculture has 
determined that the Board is necessary and in the public interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Trade Programs, Foreign 
Agricultural Service, USDA, Room 450 Portals, 1250 Maryland Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20024, telephone: (202) 690-0752, fax: (202) 690-3270, 
e-mail: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Edward R. Madigan United 
States Agricultural Export Excellence Award Board of Evaluators is to 
advise the Secretary of Agriculture on the selection of recipients for 
the Edward R. Madigan United States Agricultural Export Excellence 
Award.

[[Page 63548]]

    Dated: November 1, 2007.
Michael W. Yost,
Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
[FR Doc. 07-5607 Filed 11-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-M
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 210 (Wednesday, October 31, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 61648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5436]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD

Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting


Time and Date:

    9 a.m. (Eastern Time), November 19, 2007.

Place: 4th Floor Conference Room, 1250 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 
20005.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered:
    1. Approval of the minutes of the October 15, 2007 Board member 
meeting.
    2. Executive Director's Report:
    a. Monthly Participant Activity Report.
    b. Monthly Investment Performance Report.
    c. Legislative Report.
    3. Trade Pattern Analysis
    4. Internal Controls Initiative

Contact Person for More Information: Thomas J. Trabucco, Director, 
Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

    Dated: October 29, 2007.
Thomas K. Emswiler,
Secretary to the Board, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 07-5436 Filed 10-29-07; 12:33pm]
BILLING CODE 6760-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MICHAEL J. LOEBER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09-cv-402/RS-MD

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

STATE OF FLORIDA, ET AL. 

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

The Judgment (Doc. 52) is vacated.

ORDERED on August 20, 2010

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE