alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

TRUST FINANCIAL, A MORTGAGE

COMPANY, LLC, a Texas Limited

Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cv49-SPM/AK

FORT ATKINSON PLANTATION, LLC.,

a Florida Limited Liability Company, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

Upon consideration, Plaintiff’s (Doc. 35) Stipulated and Consented Motion for

Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File Responses to the Pleadings Filed at Docket

Entry Numbers 24 and 27 is granted. Plaintiff shall have up to and

including July 27, 2010, to file and serve responses to the pleadings filed as

docket entry numbers 24 and 27.

SO ORDERED this 19th day of July, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 09, 2024.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 09, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0214. DANIEL OTU v. ANITA WHYTE-OTU.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2023CV383838
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JAMES ARTHUR JONES, SR, MARY ANN JONES, OZIAH CARSON JONES, SHANTELL

SHAMEA JONES, KEVIN KENNEDY, MURIELLE KELLY KENNEDY, SANDRA WATTS

KENNEDY, FARINDA OSTEEN, MARIA PARSONS, MICHAEL PARSONS, AARON

JONES STEPHENSON, CARLOS UDAE STEPHENSON,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00071-MP -GRJ

BEAZER EAST INC, CABOT CORPORATION, KOPPERS INC, Koppers Holdings, Inc.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 76, Motion for Extension of Time to File

Response as to Doc. 22, Amended Complaint. Defendants timely request until January 31, 2011

to respond to the Amended Complaint, to which the Plaintiffs do not object.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Motion for Extension of Time to File Response as to Doc. 22, Amended

Complaint, is GRANTED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of December, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
#### STATE v. PROCTOR

No. 520P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 631.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK .................................................................... 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

LANCELOT PAUL LUTCHMAN. 

Defendant. 1 

07-CR-382 (JFK) 

ORDER 

c i 

Whereas defendant was ordered to home detention with electronic monitoring at his bail 

hearing on October 16, 2006; 

Whereas defendant has made an application to the Court to modify the terms of his home 

confinement in order to allow him to travel mvay from his home to celebrate his mother-in-law's 

60Ih birthday and to travel for the upcoming Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays; 

Whereas the Government takes no position with respect to defendant's application; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the conditions of defendant's bail be modified in order 

to allou him to: 

(1) Travel to Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania from November 16 through November 18. and 

December 21 through December 23. 

(2) Travel to the Bronx on Thanksgiving day, and from December 24 through December 

26. 

DATED: 

SO ORDERED - 

Case 1:07-cr-00382-JFK Document 25 Filed 11/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 11 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 11 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 11 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 11 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 11 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 11 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 11 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 11 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 8 of 8
#### STATE v. LUKE WHITE.

(Filed 2 June, 1965.)

Criminal Law § 136—

The fact that a criminal prosecution for possession of intoxicating liquor results in a verdict of not guilty upon the suppression of evidence obtained without a search warrant does not preclude the court from activating a prior sentence suspended on condition that defendant not have on his premises any quantity of intoxicating beverage and that he permit a search of his premises without a warrant.

Appeal by defendant from *Mallard, J.,*Regular January, 1965 Session, RobesoN Superior Court.

*T. W. Bruton, Attorney General, Harry W. McGalliard, Deputy ' Attorney General for the State.*

*L. J. Britt •& Son, Barrington •& Britt for defendant appellant*

Per Curiam.

At the October, 1963 Criminal Session, Robeson Superior Court, the defendant, Luke White, entered a plea of guilty to a charge of manufacturing liquor — his second offense. The court imposed a prison sentence of two years, suspended upon certain conditions to which the defendant consented, among them: “(3) That he not have on the premises occupied by him any quantity of intoxicating beverages or materials for manufacturing intoxicating beverages; (4) That he permit any lawful officer to search his premises without a search warrant.”

At the January 3, 1965, Session the appellant was charged with the unlawful possession of nontaxpaid whisky and beer. The charge grew out of the discovery of the intoxicants on his premises. The defendant challenged the validity of the search warrant under which the officers *601discovered the whisky and beer. The court held the warrant defective and suppressed the evidence which resulted in a verdict of not guilty.

After the trial, the Solicitor, in the manner provided by G.S. 15-200.1, gave notice of his motion to revoke the suspended sentence. After hearing, Judge Mallard entered judgment finding the defendant had breached the suspension order and he activated the prison sentence. The defendant excepted to the order upon the ground the evidence showing the violation was obtained by an illegal search. The defendant had agreed that he would not possess intoxicants on his premises and that the officer might search without a warrant to determine whether the order was obeyed. The defendant intentionally breached his agreement not to possess intoxicants. The court refused to permit him to welch on the agreement that the officers might search without a warrant. The evidence of the violation was discovered in accordance with the conditions of the judgment to which the defendant had agreed. The court’s order finding a breach of the conditions of the suspended sentence and ordering the suspension revoked and the sentence activated is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Global Clean Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on October 13, 2009 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

October 13, 2009
                                            /s/ Yasser Ahmad
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Yasser Ahmad
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            (Principal Financial Officer)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families
 *Title:*
                     April 2006 Current Population Survey Supplement on Child Support. *OMB No.:*
                     0992-0003. *Description:*
                     Collection of these data will assist legislators and policymakers in determining how effective their policymaking efforts have been over time in applying the various child support legislation to the overall child support enforcement picture. This information will help policymakers determine to what extent individuals on welfare would be removed from the welfare rolls as a result of more stringent child support enforcement efforts. *Respondents:*
                     Individuals and Households. Annual Burden Estimates
Instrument
Number of
                             respondents
Number of
                             responses per respondent
Average
                             burden hours per response
Total burden hoursChild Support Survey
41,300
1
.0241666
998Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours



998
 *Additional Information:*
                     Copies of the proposed collection may be obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of Administration, Office of Information Services, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests should be identified by the title of the information collection. E-mail address: 
                    *infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.* *OMB Comment:*
                     OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                    . Therefore, a comment is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Attn: Desk Officer for ACF, E-mail address: 
                    *Katherine_T._Astrich@omb.eop.gov.* Dated: October 30, 2007. Robert Sargis, Reports Clearance Officer.


[FR Doc. 07-5498  Filed 11-5-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### African Development Foundation

      ( print page 58804)    

# Meeting:

African Development Foundation, Board of Directors Meeting. 

# Time:

Tuesday, October 23, 2007, 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. 

# Place:

African Development Foundation, Conference Room, 1400 I Street, NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005. 

# Date:

Tuesday, October 23, 2007. 

# Status:

1. Closed session, October 23, 2007, 9 a.m. to 10:30 a.m.; and, 

2. Open session, October 23, 2007, 10:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. 

                        Due to security requirements and limited seating, all individuals wishing to attend the open session of the meeting must notify Doris Martin, General Counsel, at (202) 673-3916 or                         *mrivard@usadf.gov*                         of your request to attend by 9 a.m. on Friday, October 19, 2007.                     

Lloyd O. Pierson,

President. 

[FR Doc. 07-5148 Filed 10-15-07; 1:19 pm] 

BILLING CODE 6117-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Edward J. Hussey, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Liberty Homes, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, periods presented in thisquarterly report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a.             designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b.             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c.             presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a.             all significant deficiencies in the designor operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b.             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weakness.

 

 
| May 14, 2004 |   | /s/ EDWARD J. HUSSEY                      |
|--------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
| Date         |   | Edward J. Hussey, Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### HOFLER v. HILL

No. 456PA82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 201.

Petition by defendants Hill for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 October 1982.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

Defense POW/MIA Accounting AgencyFulfilling Our Nation's Promise

Search
Search

Search

              - 
              - 
              - 

-  Home		 
-  Families		 
-  Our Missing    -  Searchable List of the Missing             
  -  Searchable Map of the Missing             
  -  Recently Accounted For             
  -  World War II      -  World War II Summary             
    -  Battle of Tarawa             
    -  Attack on Pearl Harbor 
  -  Korean War      -  Korean War Summary             
    -  Battle of Chosin Reservoir             
    -  Battle of Unsan             
    -  Korean Air Battles             
    -  The Inchon Campaign             
    -  The Pusan Perimeter             
    -  The DMZ Campaigns             
    -  Korean War Disinterments             
    -  Operation Glory             
    -  POW Camps 
  -  Vietnam War      -  Vietnam War Summary             
    -  Vietnam War Identification Project             
    -  Tet Offensive             
    -  Battle of Khe Sanh             
    -  Mayaguez Incident             
    -  Battle of Ia Drang             
    -  Lam Son 
  -  Cold War             
  -  Gulf Wars & Libya             
  -  Unknowns 
-  News & Stories    -  Our Stories             
  -  Press Releases             
  -  DPAA In The News             
  -  Year In Review 
-  Multimedia    -  Livestreams             
  -  Podcast             
  -  Briefing Videos             
  -  Science Videos             
  -  DPAA Laboratory             
  -  Media Gallery 
-  Resources    -  FAQs             
  -  AFMES DNA Laboratory             
  -  Publicly Released Documents             
  -  Family/VSO Update Notes             
  -  Family Member Guide             
  -  POW/MIA Day Toolkit             
  -  USRJC 
-  About    -  Leadership             
  -  Vision-Mission-Values             
  -  DPAA Organizational Chart 
-  Contact    -  Contact Us             
  -  Join Us      -  Careers 
  -  Report a Site             
  -  Donate to the Mission 
-  Volunteer		 

## News Release

# Funeral Announcement For Airman Killed During Vietnam War (Thomas, D.)

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 1 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 2 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 3 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 4 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 5 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 6 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 7 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 8 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 9 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 10 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 11 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 12 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 13 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 14 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 15 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 16 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 17 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 18 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 19 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 20 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 21 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 22 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 23 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 24 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 25 of 26

Case 4:10-cv-00081-RH  -WCS   Document 1-1    Filed 03/04/10   Page 26 of 26
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JON ROBINSON,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv152/MCR/EMT

DAVID MORGAN, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On June 11, 2010, this court

entered an order giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to pay the filing fee or submit a completed

motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 5). Plaintiff failed to respond to the order; therefore, on

July 26, 2010, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty (20) days,

why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc. 6).1

The time for compliance with the show cause order has now elapsed and Plaintiff has not paid the

filing fee or submitted a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 25th day of August 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

 The docket reflects that on July 29, 2010, the order to show cause was returned as undeliverable, with the

notation “no longer at this address” (Doc. 7). Subsequently, other documents sent to Plaintiff by the clerk at his address

of record were likewise returned as undeliverable (see Docs. 9, 10). 
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:10cv152/MCR/EMT