alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in
his capacity as an officer of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company"), that,
to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2002

                                             By: /s/ Alfred R. Kahn
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Alfred R. Kahn
                                                 Chairman of the Board and Chief
                                                 Executive Officer

Date: November 14, 2002

                                             By: /s/ Joseph P. Garrity
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Joseph P. Garrity
                                                 Executive Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. SPEIGHT and CARTER

No. 57 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 201.

Petition by defendant Carter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 March 1976.
387-/3

ELECTRONIC RECORD

CCA # 14-12-00466-CR

William Tyrone Washington v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

TRIAL COURT:

TRIAL COURT #:

262nd District Court

1345408

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Judge, 262nd DistrictCourt

OFFENSE Aggravated Sexual Assault

COUNTY Harris

FOR REHEARING IS:

DATE: _

MOTION

DISPOSITION: jmttffflSrrfMtifi&l judge:.

DATE:

JUSTICE:.

PUBLISH:

CLK RECORD:

RPT RECORD:

STATE BR; _

APP BR: =

ImL

mm

'ih.

PC i-rC

DNP:

SUPP CLK RECORD

SUPP RPT RECORD

SUPP BR

fji<? PRO SE BR

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

3*7-/3

ELECTRONIC RECORD

S"hArte,S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: '>&,;//" /£• 2CW

£* : JUDGE

CCA IS:

JUDGE:

. MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON

CCA#

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED: _

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR STAYOF MANDATE IS:

. ON

JUDGE: , .. .. ..
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-2933 ) JARVIS D. DUFF, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 28, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; William Fuente, Judge. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cerese Crawford Taylor, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Karen M. Kinney, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, BLACK, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

PROFESSIONAL TITLE, LLC;

MICHAEL HOWELL; MICHAEL AVIS;

and AVEST, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv72/RS-EMT

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Consent Motion For Stay Pursuant To 12 U.S.C. §1821(d)(12)

(Doc. 18).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. §1821(d), this case is stayed for 180 days,

commencing on July 15, 2010.

2. Defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as receiver of The

Bank of Bonifay, shall file status reports with the court every forty-five days,

commencing forty-five days from the date of this Order.

ORDERED on August 23, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Energy Quest Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Vasant K. Jain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 9, 2010

*/s/ Vasant K. Jain*

Vasant K. Jain

Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 28, 2016

NO. 03-15-00530-CR

Jack Bissett, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to the Requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U. S. C. § 1350, as adopted, the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), Ya Kun Song, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  of the Company, hereby certifies that:
 
 (1) The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, to which this Certification is attached (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: November 15, 2010
  /s/ Ya Kun SongYa Kun SongChief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer) and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
  This certification accompanies and is being furnished with this Periodic Report, shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that Section and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filings of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Periodic report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<PAGE>
                                                          EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                          ------------





                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Ronald J. Kanterman, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results
          of operations of the Company.











Date:  March 25, 2008                /s/ Ronald J. Kanterman
       --------------        ------------------------------------------
                                       Ronald J. Kanterman
                             Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT EARL ROYSTER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv195/RV/EMT

ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________________/

ORDER

This cause is before the court on Plaintiff’s amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis

(Doc. 10). 

Upon review of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the court concludes that Plaintiff

failed to provide the requisite supporting documentation for the motion, specifically, a financial

certificate with an attached copy of his trust fund account statement covering the six-month period

preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). If Plaintiff has not been

incarcerated at his current institution for six months, he must obtain an account statement from each

facility at which he has been confined during the relevant six-moth period. Therefore, the motion

will be denied without prejudice to Plaintiff’s refiling a complete motion with the required

supporting documentation. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s amended motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 10) is DENIED

without prejudice.

2. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a prisoner

consent form and financial certificate approved for use in the Northern District. This case number

should be written on the forms.
Page 2 of 2

3. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order Plaintiff shall

(1) pay the $350.00 filing fee, or (2) submit a completed motion to proceed in forma pauperis with

the requisite prisoner consent form and financial certificate, including an attached computer printout

of the transactions in his prison account or accounts during the preceding six-month period.

4. Failure to comply with this order as instructed may result in a recommendation that

this case be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of July 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No.: 3:10cv195/RV/EMT
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 17, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-19-00806-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF SUSAN FEW, DECEASED 

On Appeal from Probate Court No 3 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 406,394 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from an order signed September 26, 2019. The district clerk 

informed this court that on October 18, 2019, the trial court signed an order vacating 

the order on appeal. We lack jurisdiction to consider an appeal where there is no 

appealable order. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(b); Stelly v. Citibank (South Dakota) 

N.A., No. 14-07-00601-CV, 2008 WL 2066571, *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th 

Dist.] May 15, 2008, no pet.). 

On November 8, 2019, notification was transmitted to all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless any party filed a 

response demonstrating grounds for continuing the appeal on or before November 
2

26, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). No response was filed.

The appeal is dismissed. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Poissant.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00213-CV

Mark A. CANTU,

Appellant

v.

GUERRA & MOORE, LLP, Carlos Guerra, J. Michael Moore, and David Lumber,

Appellees

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CVQ0001154-D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

REVERSED and this cause is REMANDED to the trial court. Costs of this appeal are taxed 

against Appellees Guerra & Moore LLP, Carlos Guerra, J. Michael Moore, and David Lumber.

SIGNED June 25, 2014.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-18-00080-CR

John S. Young, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. B-17-0081-SB, HONORABLE MARTIN “BROCK” JONES, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R A N D M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

John S. Young was charged with two counts of forgery, one count of theft, and one

count of money laundering. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 31.03, 32.21, 34.02. During trial, Young

pleaded not guilty to all four charges. At the end of the trial, the jury found Young guilty of all four

charges. Following his convictions, the district court issued a certification of Young’s right of

appeal with checks and other marks next to the boxes certifying the following: this case “is not a

plea-bargain case, and the defendant has the right to appeal”; this case “is a plea-bargain case, and

the defendant has NO right to appeal”; and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.”

Based on the record before this Court, it appears that the district court’s certification

signed May 9, 2018, may be incorrect. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614 (Tex. Crim. App.

2005) (explaining that when determining whether appellant has right to appeal, appellate courts
examine trial court’s certification for defectiveness, defined as certification that is “correct in form

but which, when compared to the record before the court, proves to be inaccurate”). Therefore, we

abate the appeal and remand the case to the district court to issue a new certification. See Tex. R.

App. P. 37.1 (requiring appellate court to notify parties if there appears to be defect in certification);

Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614 (stating that appellate courts have authority under Rules of Appellate

Procedure “to obtain another certification, whenever appropriate”).

The district court clerk is instructed to forward to this Court a supplemental clerk’s

record containing the new certification no later than April 29, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c)

(stating that if appellate court “orders the trial court to prepare . . . certification of the defendant’s

right of appeal as required by these rules, the trial court clerk must prepare, certify, and file in the

appellate court a supplemental clerk’s record”).

It is ordered on March 29, 2019.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Abated and Remanded

Filed: March 29, 2019

Do Not Publish

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          17,090
<SECURITIES>                                    13,068
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,365
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,491
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                92,252
<PP&E>                                          56,013
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,862
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 144,079
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,608
<BONDS>                                          2,661
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,362
<OTHER-SE>                                     101,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   144,079
<SALES>                                        103,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               105,305
<CGS>                                           74,709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   628
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,842
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,060
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,782
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,782
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .76
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 3 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 4 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 5 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 6 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 7 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 8 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 9 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 10 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 11 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 12 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 13 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 14 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 15 of 16Case 1:07-cv-03266-GBD Document 8 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 16 of 16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TECHSHELL, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv154/RS-MD

HARD CANDY CASES, LLC;

SPECK PRODUCT DESIGN, INC.;

IPEARL, INC.; XGEAR, LLC;

CASE-MATE GEORGIA, LLC;

CASE-MATE INTERNATIONAL, LLC;

and CASE-MATE RETAIL, INC.,

Defendants.

___________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are Defendants’ Motion For Continuance Of May 9, 2011, Trial By

Four Months And Motion To Extend Discovery And Mediation Until April 30, 2011, 

(Doc. 135) and Plaintiff’s Motion For Clarification Regarding Expert Disclosures 

(Doc. 110).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Motion To Extend Mediation Until April 30, 2011, is denied as moot.

2. The discovery deadline is extended to April 30, 2011.

3. The parties shall file an amendment to the Joint Planning and Scheduling

Report to provide for disclosure and discovery of expert testimony

consistent with the discovery deadline of April 30, 2011. All other

deadlines dependent upon the discovery deadline are adjusted

accordingly. 
4. Trial is rescheduled for July 11, 2011, in Panama City, Florida.

ORDERED on February 8, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
KOLLMORGEN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES                   EXHIBIT 27
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED
      IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                        <C>        
<PERIOD-TYPE>              3-MOS      
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                         11,949 
<SECURITIES>                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                  40,457 
<ALLOWANCES>                      713 
<INVENTORY>                    21,668 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               79,909 
<PP&E>                         96,721 
<DEPRECIATION>                (72,115)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                135,192 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          54,334 
<BONDS>                             0 
<COMMON>                       26,916 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0 
<PREFERRED>                         0 
<OTHER-SE>                     (3,470)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  135,192 
<SALES>                        43,351 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               50,587 
<CGS>                          30,663 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  35,306 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               12,473 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              1,283 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 2,488 
<INCOME-TAX>                      478 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             2,010 
<DISCONTINUED>                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0 
<CHANGES>                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                    2,010 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    0.20 
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0.20 
        



</TABLE>
# C_2009071EN.01001901.xml

| 25.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 71/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 71/19

---

Special Report No 9/2008 ‘The effectiveness of EU support in the area of freedom, security and justice for Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine’

(2009/C 71/08)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 9/2008 ‘The effectiveness of EU support in the area of freedom, security and justice for Belarus, Moldova and Ukraine’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: www.eca.europa.eu

A hard copy and a CD-ROM version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Communication and Reports Unit |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel: + 352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Communication and Reports Unit

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel: + 352 4398-1

E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Rogue Wave Software, Inc:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-16749, 333-48485 and 333-48525) on Form S-8 of Rogue Wave Software,
Inc. of our reports dated October 26, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance
sheets of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998
and 1999 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 1999, and the related schedule, which reports appear in the
September 30, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K, of Rogue Wave Software, Inc. and
subsidiaries.

                                 KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado
December 9, 1999
#### STATE v. CHINN

No. 62P82.

Case below: 47 N.C. App. 207.

Application by defendant for further review denied 30 March 1982.