alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case Nos.: 3:10cr30/MCR/EMT

3:14cv609/MCR/EMT

ROBERT E. BOURLIER

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated November 6, 2014. (Doc. 454). The parties have been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 451) is SUMMARILY DENIED and DISMISSED as untimely.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1 day of December, 2014. st

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 456 Filed 12/01/14 Page 1 of 1
# C_2012143EN.01014901.xml

| 22.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/149 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/149

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Community’

COM(2011) 855 final — 2011/0416 (COD)

2012/C 143/33

On 13 December 2011 the European Parliament and on 2 February 2012 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43, paragraph 2 and Article 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Regulation Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Community

Proposal for a Regulation Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009 setting up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the European Community

COM(2011) 855 final – 2011/0416 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 478th plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2012 (meeting of 22 February 2012), by 130 votes with 9 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 22 February 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 23, 2019 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01521-CV 

IN RE REGINALD ARLEIGH NOBLE, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 4 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. F00-50025-K 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Evans 

Opinion by Justice Evans 

Relator Reginald Arleigh Noble filed a petition for writ of quo warranto in this Court, see

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1, claiming Criminal District Court No. 4 lacked jurisdiction to convict him in 

2000 for aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 years of age and asking this Court to grant 

him a new trial. Noble was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to life 

in prison. His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. See Noble v. State, No. 08-01-00035-

CR, 2002 WL 221886 (Tex. App.—El Paso Feb. 4, 2002, pet. ref'd) (not designated for 

publication). 

A writ of quo warranto is an extraordinary remedy used for raising certain actions against 

private corporations and railroad companies as well as raising questions concerning the proper 

person entitled to hold a public office and exercise its functions. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE 

ANN. § 66.001; see State ex rel. Angelini v. Hardberger, 932 S.W.2d 489, 490 (Tex. 1996); Save 

Our Springs All., Inc. v. Lazy Nine Mun. Util. Dist. ex rel. Bd. of Directors, 198 S.W.3d 300, 310 
 –2– 

(Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006, pet. denied). Quo warranto proceedings are brought in the name of 

the State by the Attorney General or the proper district or county attorney. Robinson v. Neeley, 

192 S.W.3d 904, 909 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2006, no pet.). Noble’s petition complains that the trial 

court lacked jurisdiction to convict him; he does not raise an issue for which a writ of quo warranto 

is available. Therefore, quo warranto is an improper vehicle for obtaining the relief he seeks. 

Furthermore, the writ power of this Court is limited to issuing writs of mandamus and all 

other writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction, which does not include a writ of quo warranto. 

See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a). The Texas Supreme Court, not the courts of appeals, is 

vested with the power to issue writs of quo warranto. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.002(a); see TEX.

CONST. art. V, § 3. We do not have original jurisdiction over proceedings seeking a writ of quo 

warranto. 

Finally, even if we broadly construed Noble’s filing, there is no substance presented in 

support of his often repeated conclusory statement that Criminal District Court No. 4 lacked 

jurisdiction to convict him for aggravated sexual assault of a child under 14 years of age and then 

sentence him to life in prison. 

We dismiss Noble’s petition for lack of jurisdiction. 

191521F.P05 

/David Evans/ 

DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Presidential Documents

64117 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 219 

Wednesday, November 14, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8202 of November 8, 2007 

World Freedom Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On World Freedom Day, we commemorate the fall of the Berlin Wall and 

reaffirm our conviction that freedom is the inalienable right of every man, 

woman, and child. 

On November 9, 1989, the Berlin Wall fell—a triumph of freedom over 

those who denied hope and opportunity to millions. The collapse of this 

barrier signaled the demise of the Soviet empire and ushered in a new 

era of liberty for much of Central and Eastern Europe. In the end, tyranny 

was overpowered by ordinary people who wanted to live their lives freely, 

worship God freely, and speak the truth to their children. With moral 

clarity and courage, brave individuals can change the course of history. 

Our Nation remains committed to the advance of freedom and democracy 

as the great alternatives to repression and radicalism. America calls on 

every country that stifles dissent to end its repression, to trust its people, 

and to grant its citizens the liberty they deserve. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 9, 2007, 

as World Freedom Day. I call upon the people of the United States to 

observe this day with appropriate ceremonies and activities, reaffirming 

our dedication to freedom and democracy. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day 

of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirtysecond. 

[FR Doc. 07–5701 

Filed 11–13–07; 9:52 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES2GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
# C_2009134EN.01000101.xml

| 13.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 June 2009

2009/C 134/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,4004 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,55 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4457 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85380 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,7555 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5099 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8845 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,655 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 277,81 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,6966 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4791 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2001 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1532 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,7255 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5708 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,8543 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,1893 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0338 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 750,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,2452 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,5701 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,2582 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 138,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9091 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 66,418 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,3717 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,768 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,7099 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7584 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,6640 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,4004

JPY

Japanese yen

137,55

DKK

Danish krone

7,4457

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85380

SEK

Swedish krona

10,7555

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5099

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8845

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,655

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

277,81

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,6966

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4791

RON

Romanian leu

4,2001

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1532

AUD

Australian dollar

1,7255

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5708

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,8543

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,1893

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0338

KRW

South Korean won

1 750,32

ZAR

South African rand

11,2452

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,5701

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,2582

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 138,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9091

PHP

Philippine peso

66,418

RUB

Russian rouble

43,3717

THB

Thai baht

47,768

BRL

Brazilian real

2,7099

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7584

INR

Indian rupee

66,6640

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                     UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Statement of Income, Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>               
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS                                    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      3,795,541
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                       49,882
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           907,314
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                          69,281
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 7,085,708
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11,907,726
<COMMON>                                         607,837
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      1,093,498
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                              907,209
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 2,608,544
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            637,450
<PREFERRED>                                       63,562
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           4,395,555
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                     0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                              0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                         0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    101,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                          1,050
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 4,100,565
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                 11,907,726
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      2,296,518
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             167,470
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     1,570,389
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     1,737,859
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          558,659
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 7,912
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   550,747
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         304,446
<NET-INCOME>                                     246,301
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       38,865
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    207,436
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         161,758
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        263,530
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           545,378
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      $1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      $1.71
        


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

TONY CHOY YOUNG and 

SHELLY DAWN CARTER, 

husband and wife,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00266-SPM-GRJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

____________________________ /

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion To Extend Expert

Witness Disclosures. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiffs request the Court to enter an order

extending the deadlines for disclosure of expert witnesses to coincide with the

discovery, mediation and trial dates established in the Scheduling Order For Discovery,

Mediation And Trial. (Doc. 11.) Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(B) Plaintiffs represent that

Defendant does not object to the requested extension.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

(1) Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion To Extend Expert Witness Disclosures (Doc.

12) is GRANTED. 

(2) Plaintiffs’ Rule 26(a)(2) expert witness disclosures shall be due by March

20, 2011 and Defendant’s Rule 26(a)(2) expert witness disclosures shall 
Page 2 of 2

be due by May 5, 2011.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22 day of December, 2010. nd

s/Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:09-cv-00266-SPM-GRJ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ALISON SAPP WHITE, 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-102/RS-EMT

BREG, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53), and 

Motions to Exclude Causation Testimony (Docs. 57, 58, 59, 60, 61) is deferred until 

Defendant complies with N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 7.1 (B). 

ORDERED on April 11, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the “Trust”) does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that: 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2020 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
/s/ Ron E. Hooper
Ron E. Hooper

Senior Vice President onbehalf of Simmons Bank, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust

Dated: November 16, 2020 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 
**
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RAYMOND SCOTT,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00228-MP-AK

DAVID HARVEY,

WAKULLA COUNTY SHERIFF, et al,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in which Petitioner challenges his detention pending removal to the

Bahamas pursuant to an order of an immigration judge. Because Petitioner is proceeding under

§ 2241, the only proper named respondent is his current custodian, the Sheriff of Wakulla

County. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to amend the docket to reflect

the correct respondent. Further, Petitioner failed to either pay the $5.00 habeas corpus filing fee

or file a motion for leave to proceed as a pauper. Petitioner must correct this deficiency within

30 days. Due to the nature of Petitioner’s claims, the Court will not defer service of the Petition

pending receipt of the fee or Petitioner’s IFP motion. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Petitioner shall pay the filing fee or file a motion for leave to proceed as a pauper on

or before July 30, 2010.

2. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1) and this Order by

certified mail to the Respondent: Sheriff David Harvey, at Wakulla County Sheriff’s

Office, 15 Oak Street, Crawfordville, FL 32327, and the United States Attorney for the

Northern District of Florida, Tallahassee (Attn: Civil Process Clerk). Additionally, the
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:10-cv-00228-MP-AK

Clerk shall send a copy of the Petition and this Order by certified mail to the Attorney

General of the United States in Washington, D.C. All costs of service shall be advanced

by the United States. 

3. Respondents shall have until August 30, 2010, to respond and show cause why the

Petition should not be granted.

4. Petitioner shall have until September 20, 2010, to file his reply to Respondent's

response. 

5. Upon receipt and review of the Respondent’s response, the administrative record, and

Petitioner’s reply, the Court will determine whether an evidentiary hearing is warranted. 

See Rule 8, Habeas Rules. If the Court determines that an evidentiary hearing is not

warranted under Rule 8 and the record is sufficient to resolve the petition, then the Court

may dispose of the Petition on the basis of the record presented without further notice to

the Petitioner. See id. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of July, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 226 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian Tribes on Indian lands under 

the National Labor Relations Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24, 2019 

Mr. MORAN (for himself, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. RISCH, Mr. THUNE, Mr. 

LANKFORD, Mr. DAINES, and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To clarify the rights of Indians and Indian Tribes on Indian 

lands under the National Labor Relations Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Labor Sov5 ereignty Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF EMPLOYER. 

7 Section 2 of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

8 U.S.C. 152) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘or any In10 dian Tribe, or any enterprise or institution owned 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 226 IS

1 and operated by an Indian Tribe and located on its 

2 Indian lands,’’ after ‘‘subdivision thereof,’’; and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(15) The term ‘Indian Tribe’ means any Indian 

5 Tribe, band, nation, pueblo, or other organized group or 

6 community which is recognized as eligible for the special 

7 programs and services provided by the United States to 

8 Indians because of their status as Indians. 

9 ‘‘(16) The term ‘Indian’ means any individual who 

10 is a member of an Indian Tribe. 

11 ‘‘(17) The term ‘Indian lands’ means— 

12 ‘‘(A) all lands within the limits of any Indian 

13 reservation; 

14 ‘‘(B) any lands title to which is either held in 

15 trust by the United States for the benefit of any In16 dian Tribe or Indian or held by any Indian Tribe or 

17 Indian subject to restriction by the United States 

18 against alienation; and 

19 ‘‘(C) any lands in the State of Oklahoma that 

20 are within the boundaries of a former reservation (as 

21 defined by the Secretary of the Interior) of a feder22 ally recognized Indian Tribe.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2009075EN.01003301.xml

| 31.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 75/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 75/33

---

Call for proposals under the annual work programme for grants in the field of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) for 2009

(Commission Decision C(2009) 2179

(2009/C 75/10)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy and Transport, is hereby launching a call for proposals in order to award grants to projects in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the annual work programme for grants in the field of the Trans-European Transport Network for 2009.

The maximum amount available under this call for proposals, for 2009, is EUR 80 million.

EUR 80 million

The call is closing on 15 May 2009.

15 May 2009

The complete text of the call for proposals is available on:

http://ec.europa.eu/transport/infrastructure/ten_t_ea/call_for_proposals_2009_en.htm

---