alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 208 (Monday, October 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 61165]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL


Appraisal Subcommittee; 60 Day Notice of Intent To Request 
Clearance for Extension of Collection of Information; Opportunity for 
Public Comment

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee, Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of intent to request from the Office of Management and 
Budget (``OMB'') clearance for extension of collections of information 
and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and 5 
CFR Part 1320, Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, the Appraisal 
Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council 
(``ASC'') is soliciting comments on the need for the collection of 
information contained in 12 CFR Part 1102, Subpart A, Temporary Waiver 
Requests. The ASC also requests comments on the practical utility of 
the collection of information; the accuracy of the burden hour 
estimate; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden to 
respondents, including use of automated information collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology.

DATES: Comments on this information collection must be received on or 
before December 28, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Ben Henson, Executive Director, Appraisal 
Subcommittee, 2000 K Street, NW., Suite 310, Washington, DC 20006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marc L. Weinberg, General Counsel, 
Appraisal Subcommittee, at 2000 K Street, NW., Suite 310, Washington, 
DC 20006 or 202-293-6250.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: 12 CFR part 1102, subpart A; Temporary Waiver Requests.
    ASC Form Number: None.
    OMB Number: 3139-0003.
    Expiration Date: Three years from OMB approval date.
    Type of Request: Extension of existing collection of information.
    Description of Need: The information sets out detailed procedures 
governing temporary waiver proceedings under Sec.  1119(b) of the Title 
XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act 
of 1989 (12 U.S.C. 3348(b)).
    Automated Data Collection: None.
    Description of Respondents: State, local or tribal government; 
individuals or households; and business and other for-profit 
institutions.
    Estimated Average Number of Respondents: 1 respondent.
    Estimated Average Number of Responses: Once.
    Estimated Average Burden Hours per Response: 10 hours for each 
proceeding.
    Estimated Annual Reporting Burden: 10 hours.

    Dated: October 24, 2007.

    By the Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial 
Institutions Examination Council.
Ben Henson,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 07-5365 Filed 10-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-M
# C_2009052EN.01002301.xml

| 5.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/23

---

Call for proposals under the work programme of the Artemis Joint Undertaking

(2009/C 52/06)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the work programme of the Artemis Joint Undertaking.

Artemis Joint Undertaking

Proposals are invited for the following call: ARTEMIS-2009-1.

ARTEMIS-2009-1

Call documentation including deadline and budget is given in the call text, which is published on the following website:

http://artemis-ju.eu/call_2009

---
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yakun International Investment & Holding Group (formerly, Rhino Productions, Inc.), a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Fengying Su, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Dated: June 12, 2012








/s/Fengying Su


Fengying Su


Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Yakun International Investment & Holding Group and will be retained by Yakun International Investment & Holding Group and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
# CE2013251EN.01012201.xml

| 31.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 251/122 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 251/122

---

Tuesday 13 March 2012Agreement between the EU, Iceland and Norway on the application of certain provisions of the Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters ***

P7_TA(2012)0066

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 March 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the application of certain provisions of the Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union and the 2001 Protocol thereto (05306/2010 – C7-0030/2010 – 2009/0189(NLE))

2013/C 251 E/27

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (05306/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (05306/2010),

| — | having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the application of certain provisions of the Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union and the 2001 Protocol thereto (14938/2003), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway on the application of certain provisions of the Convention of 29 May 2000 on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters between the Member States of the European Union and the 2001 Protocol thereto (14938/2003),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 82(1), point (d) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0030/2010), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 82(1), point (d) and Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0030/2010),

| — | having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81 and 90(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0020/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A7-0020/2012),

| 1. | Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States, of the Republic of Iceland and of the Kingdom of Norway. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States, of the Republic of Iceland and of the Kingdom of Norway.

---
NO. 07-09-0279-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL D

	AUGUST 26, 2009

	______________________________

	IN RE DAN VERNON WEST, RELATOR

	_________________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.

	ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

	Relator Dan Vernon West, acting pro se, has filed in this court a petition for mandamus asking that we order the Hon. John B. Board, judge of the 181st District Court of Randall County, to recuse himself or request the presiding judge of the administrative judicial district to assign a judge to hear the motion.    

	According to his petition, the relief relator seeks in this original proceeding relates to trial court cause number 19,298-B, pending in the 181st District Court, a criminal case in which relator is the defendant.  Although relator is represented by counsel in that proceeding, his recusal motion also was filed pro se.   

	Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation here or in the trial court.  See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.3d 481, 498 (Tex.Crim.App. 1995); Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding).  Because the issues raised in his pro se petition for writ of mandamus relate directly to a criminal proceeding in which relator is represented by counsel, we find the absence of a right for hybrid representation means his pro se petition presents nothing for our consideration.  Patrick, 906 S.W.2d at 498; see In re Jones, No. 04-06-00026-CV, 2006 WL 286782 (Tex.App.–San Antonio Feb. 8, 2006, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.).  Moreover, a trial court has no legal duty to rule on a pro se motion filed in that proceeding by an accused who is represented by counsel.  See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007) (trial court free to rule on, or disregard, motion filed pro se by defendant represented by counsel).  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed. 

							James T. Campbell

							         Justice
<TABLE>
                                                                                                 EXHIBIT 12

                     KENTUCKY POWER COMPANY
        Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                    Twelve
                                                                                                    Months
                                                              Year Ended December 31,               Ended
                                                  1994       1995       1996       1997      1998   6/30/99
<S>                                             <C>        <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>       <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds . . . . . .  $19,090    $19,090    $14,914   $14,867   $13,936   $13,771
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt . . . . . .     -         2,422      6,446     8,597    12,188    12,755
  Interest on Short-term Debt. . . . . . . . .    1,621      2,242      2,849     3,034     2,455     2,189
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges . . . . . . .      485        510        555       559       634       640
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals.      700        700        800     1,700     1,500     1,500
       Total Fixed Charges . . . . . . . . . .  $21,896    $24,964    $25,564   $28,757   $30,713   $30,855

Earnings:
  Net Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  $25,273    $25,128    $16,973   $20,746   $21,676   $25,450
  Plus Federal Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . .    2,178      3,914      5,119     9,415     9,785    12,624
  Plus State Income Taxes. . . . . . . . . . .    1,154      1,420        598     2,190     2,096     2,327
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above). . . . . . . .   21,896     24,964     25,564    28,757    30,713    30,855
       Total Earnings. . . . . . . . . . . . .  $50,501    $55,426    $48,254   $61,108   $64,270   $71,256

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges . . . . . .     2.30       2.22       1.88      2.12      2.09      2.30
</TABLE>
#### AMERICA CLIPPER CORP. v. HOWERTON

No. 189 PC.

No. 119 (Fall Term).

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 539.

Petition by Finance America for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 31 August 1981.
<PAGE>
 
      [LETTERHEAD OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. APPEARS HERE]

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

EEX Corporation
Suite 1400
2500 CityWest Blvd.
Houston, Texas 77042



           CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

        We hereby consent to the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K, for 
the year ended December 31, 1998, for EEX Corporation in accordance with the 
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. We consent to the inclusion in such 
Annual Report of our reserve report incorporated therein, references to our name
in the form and context in which they appear, and the incorporation by reference
thereof into the company's Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-24595 
and No. 333-41979) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-64427).


                                        NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.



                                       
                                        By: /s/ Frederic D. Sewell
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Frederic D. Sewell
                                           President

Dallas, Texas
March 11, 1999
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SIMEI MOREIRA DA SILVA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-784

[February 6, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Elizabeth Anne Scherer, Judge; L.T. Case No.

99-12606CF10A.

Simei Moreira da Silva, Indiantown, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Paul Patti, III, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

Melanie Leitman of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & 

Sitterson, P.A., Tallahassee, for Amicus Curiae, Brenda D. Forman, 

Broward County Clerk of Court.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 10.2


 





THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS


 


OF


 


CANNABICS PHARMACEUTICALS INC.


 


 


The following is a
true copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors of this Corporation at a special meeting, notice to this meeting
having been waived, held on this 16th day of April, 2020;


 


The Board of Directors which was present
for this meeting & took active part therein was:


 


Eyal Barad


Itamar Borochov


 


Dr. Gil Feiler (as permanent observer on
the Board)


 


WHEREAS,


 


In order to more actively
assist the company in advancing its goals, Director and Board Member Gabriel Yariv has agreed to assume additional responsibilities
in the company;


 


NOW THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the majority of Directors having considered this matter, and having opened the floor to all those who voice a preference
in the issue and pursuant to NRS §78.315, have unanimously decided and RESOLVED that:


 


Gabriel Yariv has been
Nominated and has Accepted the position as President of the Company;


 


Said Motion is hereby passed and the corporate
books, records and the Secretary shall file this Resolution in the corporate records


 


 


DATED: 16th April, 2020





_____________________________


David E. Price, Secretary, Corp Counsel
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 192 (Thursday, October 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 56777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4918]



[[Page 56777]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; Conference Grants.
    Date: November 27, 2007.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy 2, Suite 200 
Large Conference Room, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Prabha L. Atreya, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
496-8633, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2d3c6c0d7cbd3c2c0f2dfd3dbde9cdcdbda9cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c6a7b2b4a3bfa7b6b486aba7afaae8a8afaee8a1a9b0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 28, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4918 Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### WILLIAMS v. BETHANY FIRE DEPT.

No. 327PA82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 114.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 August 1982.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

KEITH H. KRENKLIS, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 18-0712 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2015-135529-001

The Honorable Jose S. Padilla, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix

By Gerald R. Grant

Counsel for Respondent

Keith H. Krenklis, Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge James B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court, in 

which Judge Jon W. Thompson and Vice Chief Judge Peter B. Swann joined.

FILED 2-19-2019
STATE v. KRENKLIS

Decision of the Court

2

M O R S E, Judge:

¶1 Petitioner Keith Krenklis petitions this court for review from 

the dismissal of his of-right petition for post-conviction relief ("PCR") 

pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. For the reasons 

stated, we grant review but deny relief.

¶2 Krenklis pleaded guilty to three offenses, including two 

counts of attempted molestation of a child. In his petition for PCR, he 

claimed his convictions violated the federal constitution because A.R.S. 

§ 13-1407(E) (2017) impermissibly shifted the burden of proof to the 

defendant. The superior court denied this claim. In his petition for review, 

Krenklis raises the same claim.

¶3 We will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for 

post-conviction relief unless the court abused its discretion. State v. 

Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). The petitioner has the burden to 

show the court abused its discretion. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, 

¶ 1 (App. 2011).

¶4 Here, we find no abuse of discretion. Krenklis claims the 

statutes he violated unconstitutionally shifted the burden of proof to the 

defendant by requiring the defendant to prove a lack of sexual motivation 

as an affirmative defense. In support, Krenklis cites May v. Ryan, 245 F.

Supp. 3d 1145, 1164 (D. Ariz. 2017), which found the statutes to be 

unconstitutional. That opinion, however, is not binding on our Court. State 

v. Gates, 118 Ariz. 357, 359 (1978). Our state supreme court has found the 

child molestation statutes constitutional, State v. Holle, 240 Ariz. 300, 308, 

¶ 38 (2016), and we are bound by the decisions of our supreme court, State 

v. Smyers, 207 Ariz. 314, 318, ¶ 15, n.4 (2004). We find no error.

¶5 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review but deny relief.
# C_2011124EN.01001201.xml

| 27.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 124/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 124/12

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

2011/C 124/08

The Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block F9 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).

Mijnbouwregeling

Staatscourant

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block F9 of the Dutch continental shelf.

Mijnbouwwet

Staatsblad

The Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the above mentioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| De minister van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie |
| --- |
| ter attentie van de heer P. Jongerius, directie Energiemarkt |
| ALP A/562 |
| Bezuidenhoutseweg 30 |
| Postbus 20101 |
| 2500 EC Den Haag |
| NEDERLAND |

De minister van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie

ter attentie van de heer P. Jongerius, directie Energiemarkt

ALP A/562

Bezuidenhoutseweg 30

Postbus 20101

2500 EC Den Haag

NEDERLAND

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained by calling Mr P. C. de Regt on the following telephone number: +31 703797382.

---