alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 8, 2009 

d0505 

Order 

 

May 8, 2009 

138759 

In re BABY BOY MARZELL GROVESHEALY, SHAMAR TONY GROVEPATRICK, and SHAWNTA ́ COOPERGROVE, Minors. 

_________________________________________/ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 138759 

 COA: 286790 

Wayne CC Family Division: 

JIQUETTA TRINA GROVE, a/k/a, 07-475632 

JIQUETTA TRINI GROVE, 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

SEBASTIAN PATRICK, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 31, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 1, 2021

b0524 

# Order

Clerk June 1, 2021

161995 (68)

BRENDA BRADLEY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 161995

COA: 353627

Kent CC: 20

- 001193

- CH

BETH STRIEGLE and DAVID V. SWANSON,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

SHIRL S. SWANSON,

Defendant,

and

JOSLIN MONAHAN,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 17, 2021

order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that reconsideration

of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MARK ANTHONY FRENCH,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5:10cv162/MCR/GRJ

SECRETARY, DEPT. OF

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 28, 2013. (Doc. 20). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The court has

made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of August, 2013.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
```
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350

For the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certify that, to their
knowledge:

     1.  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eagle Broadband, Inc. for the year
         ended August 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
         Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

     2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         Eagle Broadband, Inc.

Date: November 29, 2005

                                     /s/ DAVID MICEK
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     David Micek
                                     President & Chief Executive Officer

                                     /s/ ERIC BLACHNO
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Eric Blachno
                                     Chief Financial Officer
```
# C_2009148EN.01000802.xml

| 30.6.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5503 — SIBUR/CITCO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 148/04

On 23 June 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5503. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5503. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LESLIE COX.

(Filed 22 September, 1965.)

Constitutional Law § 29; Criminal Law § 189—

Tbe Supreme Court will take notice *ew mero motu*of error in permitting defendant to waive a jury trial in a criminal prosecution in the Superior Court after plea of not guilty.

Appeal by defendant from *Cowper, J.,*May 1965 Mixed Session of Pitt.

Defendant was tried and convicted in the County Court of Pitt County upon a warrant charging him with the unlawful possession, transportation, and possession for the purpose of sale of 39 gallons of nontaxpaid whiskey. From the judgment imposed he appealed to the Superior Court. When the case was called for trial, defendant, through counsel, entered a plea of not guilty; and, with the consent of the solicitor, waived a jury trial. Thereupon Judge Cowper heard the State’s evidence' — the defendant offered none' — and rendered a verdict of “guilty of transporting.” From the prison sentence imposed defendant appeals, assigning as error the admission of certain evidence and the failure of the court to allow his motion for nonsuit.

*345
      *T. W. Bruton, Attorney General, James F. Bullock, Assistant Attorney General for the State.*

*Roberts & Wooten for defendant appellant.*

Pee Ctjbiam.

On the face of the record there appears a fatal error which the Court will notice *ex mero motu. State v. Dunston,*256 N.C. 203, 123 S.E. 2d 480. This case is controlled by *State v. Muse,*219 N.C. 226, 13 S.E. 2d 229, in which the Court said:

> “When a defendant in a criminal prosecution in the Superior Court enters a plea of not guilty he may not, without changing his plea, waive his constitutional right of trial by jury, S. *v. Hill,*209 N.C. 53, 182 S.E. 716, the determinative facts cannot be referred to the decision of the court even by consent-they must be found by the jury. *S. v. Allen,*166 N.C. 265, 80 S.E. 1075.” *Id.*at 227, 13 S.E. 2d 229.

*Accord: State v. Harper,*235 N.C. 62, 69 S.E. 2d 161; *State v. Horne,*234 N.C. 115, 66 S.E. 2d 665; *State v. Holt,*90 N.C. 749.

Since the guilt of defendant has not been established by a verdict, Sitterson *v. Sitterson,*191 N.C. 319, 131 S.E. 641, the sentence imposed by the judge is a nullity. No trial has been had. The case is remanded to the Superior Court for a trial by jury as the law provides.

Error and remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Coronado National Forest, USDA Forest Service, Tucson, AZ.

# ACTION:

Notice of New Fee Site. 

# SUMMARY:

The Coronado National Forest proposes to begin charging a new $150.00 per day fee for rental of the Half Moon Ranch located 9 miles west of Sunsites, Arizona. Rental of the Cabin includes overnight use. Rental of the cabin and other facilities within the Arizona National Forests has shown that the public appreciates and enjoys the availability of historic rental facilities. Funds from the rentals will be used for the continued operation and maintenance of the Half Moon Ranch.

# DATES:

Half Moon Ranch will become available for rent July, 2008.

# ADDRESSES:

Coronado National Forest, 300 West Congress, Tucson, AZ 85701.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Makansi, Archaeologist, Coronado National Forest, (520) 760-2502.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Federal Recreation Lands Enhancement Act (Title VII, Pub. L. 108-447) directed the Secretary of Agriculture to publish a six month advance notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     whenever new recreation fee areas are established. The Coronado National Forest currently has one other rental facility. This facility is booked regularly throughout the rental season. A business analysis for the rental of the Half Moon Ranch shows that people desire having this sort of recreation experience on the Coronado National Forest. A market analysis indicates that the $150.00 daily fee is both reasonable and acceptable for this sort of unique recreation experience. People wanting to rent the Half Moon Ranch will need to do so through the National Recreation Reservation Service, at                     *http://www.recreation.gov*                     or by calling 1-877-444-6777. The National Recreation Reservation Service charges a $9 fee per reservation.                

Dated: November 1, 2007.

Jeanine Derby, 

Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest.

[FR Doc. 07-5549 Filed 11-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                           83186
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    91823
<ALLOWANCES>                                     40332
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                134677
<PP&E>                                         3502355
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2450491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1186541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            33723
<BONDS>                                         444505
<COMMON>                                       1300019
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (591706)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1186541
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                208488
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   229797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               27106
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (48415)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (48415)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (48415)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (12.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (12.15)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21



                            Z-Tel Technologies, Inc.
                              List of Subsidiaries



Z-Tel Communications, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Z-Tel Network Services, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Z-Tel Business Networks, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Z-Tel, Inc., a Nevada Corporation

Z-Tel Communications of Virginia, Inc., a Virginia Corporation

Z-Tel Holdings, Inc., a Florida Corporation

Z-Tel Investments, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

Touch 1 Communications, Inc., an Alabama Corporation,
  d/b/a Z-Tel Consumer Services

direcCONNECT, Inc., an Alabama Corporation

direcTEL, Inc., an Alabama Corporation

direcTEL, Inc., a New Brunswick Corporation

Z-Tel Consumer Services, LLC, an Alabama Limited Liability Corporation
T HE S TATE EX REL
. K RINER , A PPELLANT , v. LTV S TEEL C OMPANY ET AL ., A PPELLEES
. [Cite as State ex rel. Kriner v. LTV Steel Co. (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] Workers’ compensation -- Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 97-1183 – Submitted October 27, 1998 – Decided December 30, 1998.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD05-657.

__________________ Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A. , and Rachel B. Jaffy , for appellant. Manchester, Bennett, Powers & Ullman, L.P.A. , and Joseph R. Young, Jr. , for appellee LTV Steel Co. Betty D. Montgomery , Attorney General, and Michael A. Vanderhorst , Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

__________________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.
M OYER , C.J., D OUGLAS , R ESNICK , P FEIFER , C OOK and L UNDBERG S TRATTON , JJ., concur. F.E. S WEENEY , J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                            471
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                     3,160
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               19,910 
<PP&E>                                         28,168
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 31,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,393
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                        6,550
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   31,661
<SALES>                                        19,624 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19,624
<CGS>                                          15,202         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15,202 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,123
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 1,277
<INCOME-TAX>                                      511
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               766
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      766
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.31
        

</TABLE>
|EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                         OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer
of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (the Company), that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 8, 2009
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By:/s/
Alfred R. Kahn     
Alfred R. Kahn      Chairman of the Board and      Chief Executive
Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: May 8, 2009
|-----------------

| | By:/s/
Bruce R. Foster     
Bruce R. Foster      Executive Vice President and      Chief Financial
Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and will
be retained by 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Delores Maxwell

Appellate case number: 01-14-00681-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-39289

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

The Court requests a response from Real Party in Interest, Sugarberry Place Phase II 

Homeowner’s Association, Inc., to the petition for writ of mandamus. The response, if any, is 

due by 5:00pm on Friday, August 15, 2014. The response should address the specific harm to 

the defendants of answering the interrogatory question at issue by August 19, 2014.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 14, 2014
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

Knology, Inc. Subsidiaries (State of Incorporation):

   Knology of Knoxville, Inc. (Delaware)
   Knology of Lexington, Inc. (Delaware)
   Knology of Louisville, Inc. (Delaware)
   Knology of Nashville, Inc. (Delaware)
   Knology of Kentucky, Inc. (Delaware)
   Interstate Telephone Co., Inc. (Georgia)
   Globe Telecommunications, Inc. (Georgia)
      ITC Globe, Inc. (Delaware)
   Valley Telephone Co., Inc. (Alabama)
      Knology Broadband, Inc. (Delaware)
         Knology of Augusta, Inc. (Delaware)
         Knology of Charleston, Inc. (Delaware)
         Knology of Columbus, Inc. (Delaware)
         Knology of Huntsville, Inc. (Delaware)
         Knology of Montgomery, Inc. (Alabama)
         Knology of Panama City, Inc. (Florida)
         Knology of Alabama, Inc. (Delaware)
         Knology of Florida, Inc. (Delaware)
         Knology of Georgia, Inc. (Delaware)
         Knology of North Carolina, Inc. (Delaware)
         Knology of South Carolina, Inc. (Delaware)
         Knology of Tennessee, Inc. (Delaware)