alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-20602 Conference Calendar

RICKIE LYNN GRAVES, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus GEORGE ARANDA, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CV-2975

- - - - - - - - - - April 16, 1997 Before REAVLEY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rickie Lynn Graves, # 645074, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. He has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. The motion for leave to appeal IFP is GRANTED. A partial filing fee of $2.14 is required. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The agency having custody of Graves is directed to forward payment of the partial filing fee from his prisonerNo. 96-20602 - 2 - account to the clerk of the district court. Graves shall also make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of Graves is directed to forward payments from his prisoner account to the clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10 until the filing fee of $105 is paid. See id

. Graves argues that the indigent mail policies of TDCJ-ID limiting the hours of access to indigent postage and allowing recoupment of funds from inmate accounts are unconstitutional limits on inmates’ access to courts. These policies have been previously approved. See Guajardo v. Estelle , 568 F. Supp. 1354, 1363 (S.D. Tex. 1983) and Guajardo v. Estelle , 580 F.2d 748, 762-63 (5th Cir. 1978). Graves’ appeal is without arguable merit and, thus, frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Graves is cautioned that any future frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Graves is cautioned further to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
IFP GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 03, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 03, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A0732. JEROME DAVIS v. CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION .

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors 

and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13.

On January 22, 2021, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than February 01, 2021. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 1:10-cv-00071-MP -GRJ Document 59 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 1:10-cv-00071-MP -GRJ Document 59 Filed 12/02/10 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

Postal Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

 Notice of briefing.

# SUMMARY:

Representatives and associates of the Free Press organization will participate in a briefing with Commissioners and staff on Tuesday, October 30, 2007, beginning at 2:30 p.m., at the Postal Regulatory Commission. The briefing will address issues related to Periodicals rates.

# DATES:

October 30, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

Postal Regulatory Commission, 901 New York Avenue, NW., Suite 200, Washington, DC 20268-0001.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nanci Langley, Director of Public Affairs and Government Relations, Postal Regulatory Commission, 202-789-6887.

Steven W. Williams,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-5445  Filed 11-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-FW-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7426

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICARDO BERNARD SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, District

Judge. (CR-89-372, CA-97-795-AM)

Submitted: January 15, 1998 Decided: January 28, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricardo Bernard Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Clifford Chesnut,

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)

and motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Smith, Nos. CR-89-372; CA-97-795-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 4 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement No. 333-136566 on Form S-3, Post-Effective Amendment No. 6 to Registration Statement No. 333-89179 on Form S-3, and Registration Statement Nos. 333-136570, 333-127113 and 333-103248 on Form S-8 ofour report dated March 20, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Knology, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005 and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005appearing in and incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

March 15, 2007
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 16-0670

Filed February 8, 2017

DONTAYE JERMAINE BURTON,

Applicant-Appellant,

vs.

STATE OF IOWA,

Respondent-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Karen A. Romano, 

Judge.

An applicant appeals the district court’s denial of his postconviction-relief 

application. AFFIRMED.

Erin M. Carr of Carr & Wright, P.L.C., Des Moines, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, and Thomas J. Ogden, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee State.

Considered by Danilson, C.J., and Vogel and Vaitheswaran, JJ.
2

VOGEL, Judge.

Dontaye Burton pled guilty to second-degree robbery and second-degree 

burglary and was sentenced to two, consecutive ten-year terms in prison, with a 

mandatory minimum of seven years. See Iowa Code § 902.12 (2009). At the 

time he committed the offenses, Burton was twenty-one years old. He appealed

his conviction, but that appeal was dismissed as frivolous in 2012. In 2015, 

Burton filed an application for postconviction relief (PCR). He asked that the 

holding of State v. Lyle be extended to offenders who are twenty-five years old or 

younger. 854 N.W.2d 378, 400 (Iowa 2014) (holding all mandatory minimum 

sentences for juvenile offenders are unconstitutional). After a trial, the district

court denied Burton’s claim. 

Like the district court, we are not free to ignore controlling supreme court 

precedent. State v. Beck, 854 N.W.2d 56, 64 (Iowa Ct. App. 2014). The court in 

Lyle specifically stated:

[O]ur holding today has no application to sentencing laws affecting 

adult offenders. Lines are drawn in our law by necessity and are 

incorporated into the jurisprudence we have developed to usher the 

Iowa Constitution through time. This case does not move any of 

the lines that currently exist in the sentencing of adult offenders.

854 N.W.2d at 403. Contrary to Burton’s suggestion on appeal, nothing in the 

supreme court’s recent decision of State v. Sweet undermines this holding. 879 

N.W.2d 811 (Iowa 2016) (concluding a sentence of life without the possibility of 

parole for a juvenile offender violates the Iowa Constitution). We thus summarily 

affirm the district court’s denial of Burton’s PCR application pursuant to Iowa 

Court Rule 21.26(1)(a), (c), and (d).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 202 (Friday, October 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 59258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5180]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date: 11 a.m., Friday, November 16, 2007.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Surveillance Matters.

Contact Person for More Information:  Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-
5084.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-5180 Filed 10-16-07; 4:41 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 29, 2014

s0721

Order 

Clerk

July 29, 2014

148593

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148593

COA: 319146

Wayne CC: 09-013772-FC

LAJUAN DONTE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 4, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 31.2

                           Section 302 Certifications

I, Marc Casavant, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  form  10-KSB  of  Laredo
Investment Corp.

         2. Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any
untrue  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary
to make the  statements  made,  in light of the  circumstances  under which such
statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report.

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4.  I  am  responsible  for  establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and have:

         a) Designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared.

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c)  Presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. I have  disclosed,  based  on our  most  recent  evaluation,  to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) All significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and

Date: April 13, 2004


By: /s/ Marc Casavant
Marc Casavant, CFO, Director
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual Report of Myriad Interactive Media, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2013 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Derek Ivany, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.  By:/s/ Derek IvanyName:Derek IvanyTitle:Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and DirectorDate:October 15, 2012  This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### STATE v. LEE

No. 55 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 155.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1978.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7054

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM WOODREW SMITH, JR., a/k/a Bubba, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-01-16; CA-03-387-2) Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Woodrew Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William Woodrew Smith, Jr., a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Smith has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
#### STATE v. THOMAS

No. 136.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 186.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 May 1982.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection with the Annual report of The Blackhawk Fund (the "Company")
on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  period  ended  December  31,  2004 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brent
Fouch,  Secretary  and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     3.     The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     4.     The  information  contained  in  the  Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or  its  staff  upon  request.

                                                 /s/ Brent  Fouch
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Brent Fouch, Secretary and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 Date: April 15, 2005
U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission


Washington,
D.C. 20549





Form 10-Q
- Quarterly or Transitional Report


(Added by 34-30968, eff. 8/13/93, as
amended)





(Mark
One)


T Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





For the
quarterly period ended August 31,
2008





£ Transition Report Under Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





For the
transition period from _______________________ to





Commission
file number 0-10035




LESCARDEN
INC.


(Exact
name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)




New
      York
                            
                            13-2538207(State
      or other jurisdiction of
                            
                            (I.R.S
      Employerincorporation
      or organization)
                            
                            Identification
      No.)420
      Lexington Ave. Ste 212, New York
                            
                            10170(Address
      of principle executive office)
                            
                            (Zip
      Code)




Issuer’s
telephone number  212-687-1050







(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)





Check
whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.


Yes T No £





State the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity,
as of the latest practicable date.







Class
                  
                  Outstanding
      October 10, 2008Common
      Stock $.001 par value
                  
                  30,943,450












1




EXPLANATORY
NOTE




This abbreviated amendment
to the August 31, 2008 10-Q is being filed to include paragraph 5b of Exhibit 31
Certification pursuant to Item 601(b)(31)(i) of Regulation S-K.




2




Signatures





Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.








LESCARDEN INC.(Registrant)Date:
      March 31, 2009S/William E. LutherWilliam
      E. LutherPresident
      andChief
      Executive
Officer