alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RODNEY RUSS, #779516 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cv215-RH/WCS

EARL MORELAND, et al., 

 

Defendants.

___________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an order filed July 28,

2010, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint by August 31, 2010. Plaintiff

was specifically warned that a recommendation would be made that this case be

dismissed if there was a failure to comply with that order. Doc. 9. To date, no response

has been received from the Plaintiff. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for 
Page 2 of 2

failure to obey a court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited

(11th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with

an order or to prosecute this case, this complaint should now be dismissed without

prejudice. 

Plaintiff shall have a 14 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by filing a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on September 13, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:05cv465-RH/WCS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Forever Valuable Collectibles, Inc. (the Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended herein as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Jodi Stevens, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.   Date: May 11, 2011By:/s/ Jodi StevensJodi StevensChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
#### CONSTRUCTION CO. v. HAMLETT

No. 70 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 57.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 July 1972.
DWAYNE A. DEBOSE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-2748

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 13, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Dwayne A. Debose, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BENTON, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of BSV VII, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas A. Dyer,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





1.    The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.    The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Dated:
      June 10, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Douglas A. DyerDouglas
      A. DyerPresident
      and Director(Principal
      Executive Officer)(Principal
      Financial /Accounting
Officer)
# C_2011235EN.01000801.xml

| 11.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/8

---

DECISION TO CLOSE THE FORMAL INVESTIGATION PROCEDURE AFTER WITHDRAWAL BY MEMBER STATE

State aid — Estonia

(Articles 107 to 109 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union)

Commission notice pursuant to Article 108(2) of the TFEU — Withdrawal of notification

State aid C SA.30531 (11/C) (ex N 78/10) — Aid for Capacity Payments for Oil-Shale Fuelled Electricity Production

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 235/09

The Commission has decided to close the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU, initiated on 23 March 2011 in respect of the measure referred to above, recording that Estonia has withdrawn its notification on 23 May 2011.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                     1.000
<CASH>                                            111,154
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  126,358
<PP&E>                                             29,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                      3,940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    151,676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              21,436
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          154,719
<OTHER-SE>                                        (24,479)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      151,676
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                3,935,617
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,935,617)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,935,617)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,935,617)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.27)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

STATE OF FLORIDA, by and )

 through BILL McCOLLUM, et al., )

)

 v. ) Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT )

 OF HEALTH AND HUMAN )

 SERVICES, et. al., )

____________________________________)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record:

Please enter the appearance of Brian G. Kennnedy as counsel in this

case for defendants United States Department of Health and Human Services,

Kathleen Sebelius, United States Department of the Treasury, Timothy F.

Geithner, United States Department of Labor, and Hilda L. Solis.

/s/ Brian G. Kennedy 

Brian G. Kennedy (DC Bar 228726)

United States Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

20 Massachusetts Avenue NW

Washington, D.C. 20530

Telephone: (202) 514-3357

Fax: (202) 616-8470

Email: brian.kennedy@usdoj.gov

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 32 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Notice of Appearance is being

served on all counsel of record as of this 20th day of April, 2010, through the Court’s

Notice of Electronic Filing system.

/s/ Brian G. Kennedy 

Brian G. Kennedy (DC Bar 228726)

United States Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT Document 32 Filed 04/20/10 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

vs. Case No. 3:10cr47/LAC

JOSE GUADALUPE-GUTIERREZ

_____________________________________________________________________

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, to which

there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the Defendant, JOSE GUADALUPEGUTIERREZ, to Counts I and II of the Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear

before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 30 day of June, 2010. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

PROFESSIONAL TITLE, LLC;

MICHAEL HOWELL; MICHAEL AVIS;

and AVEST, LLC,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv72/RS-EMT

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE

CORPORATION,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Joint Motion To Extend Deadline For The Parties To Confer

And File Joint Report Or In The Alternative Issue A Revised Scheduling Order (Doc. 14)

and The Joint Case Management Report (Doc. 19).

IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file a revised joint report not later than

October 29, 2010, which shall provide for a discovery deadline consistent with March

18, 201, and jury trial on May 9 or 23, 2011.

ORDERED on August 23, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of WindTamer Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedJune 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I Molly Hedges, as Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Molly HedgesMolly HedgesActing Chief Financial Officer



Date: August 16, 2010





This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 13



CANALASKA VENTURES LTD.

(the Company)



Request for Financial Statements



National Instrument 51-102 Continuous Disclosure Obligationsrequires the Company send annually a request form to registered holders and beneficial owners of securities to enable the holders and owners to request a copy of the Companys annual financial statements and related MD&A and/or interim financial statements and related MD&A, in accordance with the procedures set out in National Instrument 54-101 Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer.  If you wish to receive either or both of the financial statements, you must complete this form and return it to our offices.



COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS FORM TO:



CANALASKA VENTURES LTD.

2303 West 41st Avenue

Vancouver, BC  V6M 2A3

Facsimile:  604-685-6550





________  I wish to receive Annual Financial Statements and related MD&A



________  I wish to receive Interim Financial Statements and related MD&A



________  I wish to receive both Annual Financial Statements and related MD&As





NAME:

TELEPHONE:





ADDRESS:

FACSIMILE:





EMAIL:





Please note that a request form will be mailed each year.  If you wish to receive such materials, a request form must be returned to the Company each year to receive the Annual and Interim Financial Statements and related MD&As.



I confirm that I am a registered / beneficial shareholder of the Company





SIGNATURE OF SHAREHOLDER:





DATE:
EXHIBIT 31.2
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Byron Cox, Chief Financial Officer of Fairchild International Corporation, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Fairchild International Corporation;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this  report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

1. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
2. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
3. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

1. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2004

/s/ Byron Cox

_____________________________
Byron Cox, Secretary, Treasurer
and Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. RAYMOND HARDING.

(Filed 24 February, 1965.)

Criminal Daw § 92—

The trial court has discretionary power, after the commencement of argument, to permit the State to reopen the case for testimony of a witness who had been tardily located, defendant having and exercising the right of cross-examination.

Appeal by defendant from *Clarkson, J.,*October 30, 1964, Session of BüNCOMBE.

Defendant is charged with criminal offenses in two indictments: (1) Case No. 64-581, assault upon a female, Donna Massey, with intent to commit rape; (2) Case No. 64-582, crime against nature with and upon Donna Massey. It is alleged that the offenses were committed in Buncombe County on 18 July 1964. The cases were consolidated for trial.

Plea: Not guilty. Verdict: Guilty as charged.

Judgment: Imprisonment for a term of 12 years on each count, the terms to run concurrently.

*Attorney General Bruton and Deputy Attorney General McGalliard for the State.*

*W. M. Styles for defendant.*

PER Cueiam.

Defendant’s motions for nonsuit were properly overruled. Evidence of the *corpus delicti*is full and direct. Defendant is identified as the perpetrator of the felonies. The testimony of the pros-ecutrix is corroborated in every detail. No purpose can be served here in recounting the evidence.

After the solicitor had commenced his argument to the jury, the judge, over the objection of defendant, permitted the State to reopen the evidence and take the testimony of a witness, William McElrath, who had been tardily located and brought into the courtroom, and whose name had been frequently mentioned by other witnesses. He was cross-examined by defendant’s counsel, and defendant was permitted to introduce evidence in rebuttal. The judge committed no error in permitting McElrath to testify. “The trial court has discretionary power to permit the introduction of additional evidence after both parties have rested, even after the argument has begun. But the opposing party should be given opportunity to introduce evidence in rebuttal.” 1 Strong: N. C. Index, Criminal Law, § 92, p. 760, and cases cited.

No error.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BENJAMIN N. MOOTS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv98-SPM/WCS

WALTER A. MCNEIL, et al.,

 

Defendant,

________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 14) dated April 20, 2010. Plaintiff has

filed objections (doc.17) pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). Having considered the report and recommendation and the

objections, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 14) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary
Page 2 of 2

restraining order (doc. 5) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of May, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 4:10cv98-SPM/WCS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2484 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2484

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for 
   operation of a Department of Veterans Affairs regional office in 
    Manila, the Republic of the Philippines, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 17, 2019

  Ms. Hirono introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority for 
   operation of a Department of Veterans Affairs regional office in 
    Manila, the Republic of the Philippines, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping Our Commitment to Overseas 
Veterans Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR OPERATION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS REGIONAL OFFICE IN MANILA, THE REPUBLIC OF THE 
              PHILIPPINES, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

    Section 315(b) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``September 30, 2019'' and inserting ``September 30, 2020''.
                                 <all>
```
#### GODWIN v. CLARK, GODWIN, HARRIS & LI

No. 171 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 710.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 30 July 1979. Motion of defendant to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 30 July 1979.