alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the Trust) does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018 (the Form 10-Q) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.



|                                                                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                  
|Ron E. Hooper                                                                                                                      
|Senior Vice President on behalf of Simmons Bank,
not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of
Marine Petroleum Trust

Dated: May 15, 2018

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of
Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Trust, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of IVT Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
period ending October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Martin Schwartz Chairman and
Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 By: /s/
Martin Schwartz
 Martin
Schwartz
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
 (Principal
Accounting Officer)
 
 December
7,  2009
---

Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Energy Quest Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Wilfred J. Ouellette, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |   |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|By: | /s/ Wilfred
      J. Ouellette        | 
|--- | ------------------------------------- | 
|    | Wilfred J. Ouellette                  | 
|    | President and Chief Executive Officer | 
|    | April 13, 2009                        | 

---
#### DOROTHY S. LOOMIS, Administratrix of the Estate of CECIL LeROY LOOMIS v. JOE ELMER TORRENCE.

(Filed 29 April, 1964.)

Appeal by defendant from *Brock, S. J.,*January 1964 Session of Rowan.

Civil action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful death of her intestate, resulting from a collision between two automobiles in a street intersection in the city of Salisbury. The jury answered issues of negligence and contributory negligence in plaintiff's favor, and awarded damages in the amount of $27,000. From a judgment on the verdict, defendant appeals.

*Kesler & Seay for defendant appellant.*

*Clarence Kluttz and Lewis P. Hamlin, Jr., for plaintiff appellee.*

PeR Cueiam.

This is the second trial of this case. In the first trial the jury answered the issues of negligence and contributory negligence in plaintiff’s favor, and awarded her damages. On appeal by defendant, this Court awarded a new trial for error in excluding defendant’s testimony of speed. *Loomis v. Torrence,*259 N.C. 381, 130 S.E. 2d 540. In both trials the plaintiff and the defendant introduced evidence. On the former appeal and on this appeal, defendant assigns as error the denial of his motion for judgment of nonsuit made at the close of all *742the evidence. A careful study of the evidence in the instant case shows' that the court properly submitted the instant case to the jury.

The jury, under application of settled principles of law stated by us in case after case involving actions for damages resulting from automobile collisions in street intersections, resolved the issues of fact in the instant case against defendant. A careful examination of defendant’s assignments of error in the instant case discloses no new question requiring extended discussion. Neither reversible nor prejudicial error in the instant case has been made to appear. The verdict and judgment in the instant case will not be disturbed.

No error.
#### STATE v. SELF

No. 273 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 586.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 193 (Friday, October 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57032-57033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4967]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

Previously Announced Date & Time: Thursday, September 20, 2007, 10 AM 
Meeting closed To the Public. This Meeting Was Cancelled.

DATE and Time: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 at 10 AM.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC.

Status: This meeting will be closed to the public.

Items To Be Discussed:
    Compliance matters pursuant to 2 U.S.C. 437g.
    Audits conducted pursuant to 2 U.S.C. Sec.  437g, 438(b), and Title 
26, U.S.C.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
    Internal personnel rules and procedures or matters affecting a 
particular employee.

DATE and Time: Thursday, October 11, 2007 at 10 AM.

Place: 999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC. (ninth floor)

Status: This meeting will be open to the public.

Items To Be Discussed:
    Correction and Approval of Minutes.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-15: GMAC LLC, by counsel, Jan Witold 
Baran and Caleb P. Burns.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-16: American Kennel Club, Inc., by 
counsel, Timothy W. Jenkins.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-17: Democratic Senatorial Campaign 
Committee, by counsel, Marc E. Elias.
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-18: Rangel for Congress and the 
National Leadership PAC, by counsel, Phu Huynh.
    Report of the Audit Division on Edwards for President.

[[Page 57033]]

    Management and Administrative Matters.

Person To Contact for Information: Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-4967 Filed 10-3-07; 1:16 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
# C_2009083EN.01003101.xml

| 7.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/31

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.5488 — Magna/Cadence Innovation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 83/14

| 1. | On 27 March 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Magna Presstec AG, a subsidiary of Magna International INC (‘Magna’, Austria) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Cadence Innovation s.r.o (‘Cadence’, Czech Republic) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 27 March 2009, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Magna Presstec AG, a subsidiary of Magna International INC (‘Magna’, Austria) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Cadence Innovation s.r.o (‘Cadence’, Czech Republic) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






  — | for Magna: automotive supplier, |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

—

for Magna: automotive supplier,

| — | for Cadence: automotive supplier. |
| --- | --- |

—

for Cadence: automotive supplier.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5488 — Magna/Cadence Innovation, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| J-70 |
| B-1049 Brussels |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax ((32-2) 296 43 01 or 296 72 44) or by post, under reference number COMP/M.5488 — Magna/Cadence Innovation, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

J-70

B-1049 Brussels

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EX-10.2





 Exhibit 10.2 

Schedule A-9 

This Schedule A-9 dated March 20, 2020, is issued pursuant to the Third Amended and Restated Executive
Employment Agreement by and among Company, Parent and Executive, dated March 20, 2019 (the “Agreement”), and shall be incorporated therein and governed by the terms and conditions of such Agreement. This Schedule A-9 is effective April 1, 2020, and is intended to replace any previously issued Schedule A. 
 1.
Position: Chief Financial Officer. Executive shall report in such capacity to Company’s Chief Executive Officer. 
 2. Base Salary:
$385,000 per year. 
 3. Bonus: Executive will be entitled to an annual performance-based cash bonus of $150,000, for the achievement of certain
financial and operational targets. These targets, and the bonus dollars tied to such targets, will be determined and communicated to you by the Chief Executive Officer on an annual basis. For the 2020 calendar year, your bonus will be based on the
following performance measures: 
  

	 	a.	 Consolidated Revenue; 



 

	 	b.	 Non-GAAP Earnings Per Share – Diluted; and 



 

	 	c.	 Consolidated Gross Profit Dollars. 



The target amount for each measure for the 2020 calendar year is set forth on Appendix 1 to this schedule. Should Company fail to achieve the
target amount for the above performance measures, Executive’s annual performance-based bonus, if any, shall be based upon Company’s evaluation of the percentage of the target amount achieved during the year. Conversely, should
Company’s performance exceed the target amount for the above performance measures, Executive’s annual performance-based bonus may exceed the bonus amount stated above, based upon Company’s evaluation of the percentage of the
over-achievement of such target amount(s). All bonuses will be paid by March 15, 2021, following the completion of Company’s year-end audit. If Executive leaves Company voluntarily, or is terminated
with Cause, before December 31, 2020, Executive will not be eligible for a bonus. If Executive is terminated by Company during 2020 without Cause, Executive’s bonus calculation will be based on Company’s annual results (calculated as
though Executive were still an employee) and a prorated bonus will be paid considering the days in 2020 in which Executive was employed by Company divided by 365. 

4. Benefits: Executive is eligible for standard company benefits in the same manner as other executives of Company. 

5. Expenses: Company will reimburse all properly documented expenses reasonably related to Executive’s performance of Executive’s duties
hereunder. 












 6. Stock Options: Executive is granted an award of 100,000
non-qualified stock options pursuant to Company’s Stock Incentive Plan, with the options vesting in four equal installments beginning on the first anniversary of the February 11, 2020, grant date.

  

									
		 		 	
					
	BY:	 	/s/ Vivek Gupta        March 20, 2020	 		 	BY:	 	/s/ John J. Cronin, Jr.        March 20, 2020
		 	Company / Date	 		 		 	Executive / Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                         252,266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,000
<INVENTORY>                                    164,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               508,698
<PP&E>                                          78,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,779
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,624,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          584,424
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,832
<OTHER-SE>                                     972,044
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,624,500
<SALES>                                        891,381
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               891,381
<CGS>                                          448,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,499,646
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,056,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,056,964)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2217 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide that overthe-road bus drivers are covered under the maximum hours requirements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to provide 

that over-the-road bus drivers are covered under the 

maximum hours requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Driver Fatigue Preven5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT 

7 OF 1938. 

8 Section 13(b)(1) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 

9 1938 (29 U.S.C. 213(b)(1)) is amended by inserting be10 fore the semicolon the following: ‘‘, except an employee 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2217 IS

1 employed as a driver of an over-the-road bus, which is a 

2 bus characterized by an elevated passenger deck located 

3 over a baggage compartment’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2009094EN.01000101.xml

| 23.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 April 2009

2009/C 94/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2947 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4486 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,88820 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 11,0375 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5121 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7605 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,073 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,00 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7094 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4140 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2408 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1314 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8370 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6106 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0340 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3269 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9509 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 747,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 11,5940 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,8428 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4245 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 112,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7185 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,033 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 43,9595 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,046 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,8866 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0480 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,1620 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2947

JPY

Japanese yen

126,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4486

GBP

Pound sterling

0,88820

SEK

Swedish krona

11,0375

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5121

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7605

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,073

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,00

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7094

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4140

RON

Romanian leu

4,2408

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1314

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8370

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6106

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0340

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3269

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9509

KRW

South Korean won

1 747,85

ZAR

South African rand

11,5940

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,8428

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4245

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 112,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7185

PHP

Philippine peso

63,033

RUB

Russian rouble

43,9595

THB

Thai baht

46,046

BRL

Brazilian real

2,8866

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0480

INR

Indian rupee

65,1620

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

GARY LEE MOYE,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv89/MCR/EMT

DAVID MORGAN, et al.,

Defendants. 

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 24, 2010 (Doc. 22). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply

with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of July, 2010.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### FOSTER v. POULTRY INDUSTRIES

No. 149 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 671.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 31 July 1972.