alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 - Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Monster
Offers, a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul Gain
-------------------------------
    Paul Gain
    Principal Executive Officer
    Principal Financial Officer


Date  November 23, 2010
      -----------------


<PAGE>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT EARL ROYSTER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv194/MCR/EMT

ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated September 23, 2010 (Doc. 14). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has not objected.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with

an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of October, 2010.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Lawrence Chimerine, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that the Annual Report of First Transaction
Management, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of First Transaction Management, Inc.




/s/
      Lawrence ChimerineLawrence
      ChimerinePrincipal
      Accounting OfficerFirst
      Transaction Management,
Inc.




March 27,
2009
### 430 MISCELLANEOUS SUPREME COURT DISPOSITIONS CERTIFIED QUESTIONS, CERTIFIED APPEALS, MANDAMUS PROCEEDINGS, AND OTHER MATTERS March 28, 2013 Crimson Trace Corporation v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP (S061086). Alternative writ of mandamus issued.
# C_2012161EN.01000101.xml

| 7.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 1 June 2012

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of Banka Slovenije

(ECB/2012/9)

2012/C 161/01

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of Banka Slovenije’s current external auditors will end following the audit for the financial year 2011. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of Banka Slovenije’s current external auditors will end following the audit for the financial year 2011. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2012.

| (3) | Banka Slovenije has selected Deloitte revizija d.o.o. as its external auditors for the financial years 2012 to 2014, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Banka Slovenije has selected Deloitte revizija d.o.o. as its external auditors for the financial years 2012 to 2014,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that Deloitte revizija d.o.o. should be appointed as the external auditors of Banka Slovenije for the financial years 2012 to 2014.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 1 June 2012.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:10cr35-SPM

RALPHY JOSEPH,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY PLEA

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States

Magistrate Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to

the Court’s consideration of any Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P.

11(e)(2), the plea of guilty of the defendant, RALPHY JOSEPH, to Counts One,

Two, and Four of the indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear

before this Court for sentencing as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of July, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 213 (Monday, November 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 62500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5519]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of: BIMS Renewable Energy, Inc. (n/k/a Tung Ding 
Resources, Inc.); Order of Suspension of Trading

November 1, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
BIMS Renewable Energy, Inc. (n/k/a Tung Ding Resources, Inc.), because 
it has not filed a periodic report since the period ended June 30, 
2004.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the 
above-listed company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on 
November 1, 2007 through 11:59 p.m. EST on November 14, 2007.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-5519 Filed 11-1-07; 10:37 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Marc A. Dosmann, certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Liberty Homes, Inc.;

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this quarterlyreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, periods presentedin this quarterly report;

 

4.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a.             designed such disclosure controls andprocedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;

 

b.             evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 daysprior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

 

c.             presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent function):

 

a.             all significant deficiencies in the designor operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and

 

b.             any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6.             The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there weresignificant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our mostrecent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significantdeficiencies and material weakness.

 

 
| May 14, 2004 |   | /s/ MARC A. DOSMANN                                            |
|--------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date         |   | Marc A. Dosmann, Vice President – Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
# C_2009062EN.01001901.xml

| 17.3.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/19

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 March 2009

(2009/C 62/06)

1 euro=

1 euro

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3042 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,51 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4563 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,92055 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9869 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5421 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7650 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,523 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 295,53 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7075 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4330 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2860 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,2067 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9679 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6534 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1109 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,4568 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,9972 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 852,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,9043 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,9183 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4347 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 585,19 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7897 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,050 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,1465 |
| THB | Thai baht | 46,710 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9706 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7348 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,0360 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3042

JPY

Japanese yen

128,51

DKK

Danish krone

7,4563

GBP

Pound sterling

0,92055

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9869

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5421

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7650

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,523

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

295,53

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7075

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4330

RON

Romanian leu

4,2860

TRY

Turkish lira

2,2067

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9679

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6534

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1109

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,4568

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,9972

KRW

South Korean won

1 852,79

ZAR

South African rand

12,9043

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,9183

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4347

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 585,19

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7897

PHP

Philippine peso

63,050

RUB

Russian rouble

45,1465

THB

Thai baht

46,710

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9706

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7348

INR

Indian rupee

67,0360

---

(1)

1

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

Source:

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**JOSEPH DAVID NAYLOR**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 131 DB 2015 (No. 61 RST 2015)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 90215** 

**(Lackawanna County)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 7 th**  **day of October, 2015, the Report and Recommendation of**  **Disciplinary Board Member dated September 25, 2015, i s approved and it is ORDERED**  **that Joseph David Naylor, who has been on Inactive Stat us, has never been suspended**  **or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the mor al qualifications, competency**  **and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be**  **and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this**  **Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and**  **processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitione r.**
# C_2011035EN.01000101.xml

| 4.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/1

---

Communication from the Commission relating to the available quantity for the May 2011 subperiod in the framework of certain quotas opened by the European Union for products in the rice sector

2011/C 35/01

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 opened tariff quotas for the import of rice originating in the overseas countries and territories (OCT) (1). No import licence applications have been submitted during the first seven days of January 2011 for the quotas with order number 09.4189 and 09.4190.

1

In accordance with the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities for which applications are not submitted are to be added to the following subperiod.

2

In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 1(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 quantities available in the following subperiod are communicated by the Commission before the 25th day of the last month of a given subperiod.

As a result, the total available quantity for the May 2011 subperiod under the quotas with order number 09.4189 and 09.4190 as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 are set out in the Annex to this communication.

---

(1)  OJ L 344, 23.12.2009, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

Quantities available for the following subperiod under Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009

| Origin | Order number | Import licence applications introduced for the January 2011 subperiod | Total available quantity for the May 2011 subperiod (in kg) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Netherlands Antilles and Aruba | 09.4189 | (1) | 16 667 000 |
| Least developed OCTs | 09.4190 | (1) | 6 667 000 |

Origin

Order number

Import licence applications introduced for the January 2011 subperiod

Total available quantity for the May 2011 subperiod (in kg)

Netherlands Antilles and Aruba

09.4189

(1)

16 667 000

Least developed OCTs

09.4190

(1)

6 667 000

---

(1)  No allocation coefficient for this subperiod: no licence applications were sent to the Commission.

---
# C_2009150EN.01000102.xml

| 2.7.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5507 — Q-Cells/Good Energies/Norsun/Sunfilm)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 150/02

On 28 May 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5507. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5507. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
Presidential Documents

5593 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 24 

Tuesday, February 6, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of February 5, 2007 

Continuation of the National Emergency Blocking Property of 

Certain Persons Contributing to the Conflict in Cote d’Ivoire 

On February 7, 2006, by Executive Order 13396, I declared a national emergency and ordered related measures blocking the property of certain persons 

contributing to the conflict in Cote d’Ivoire, pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706). I took this action 

to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security 

and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in 

or in relation to Cote d’Ivoire, which has been addressed by the United 

Nations Security Council in Resolution 1572 of November 15, 2004, and 

subsequent resolutions, and has resulted in the massacre of large numbers 

of civilians, widespread human rights abuses, significant political violence 

and unrest, and attacks against international peacekeeping forces leading 

to fatalities. 

Because the situation in or in relation to Cote d’Ivoire continues to pose 

an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign 

policy of the United States, the national emergency declared on February 

7, 2006, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, 

must continue in effect beyond February 7, 2007. Therefore, in accordance 

with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), 

I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive 

Order 13396. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted 

to the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

February 5, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–555 

Filed 2–5–07; 12:44 pm] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES4GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF
KNOLOGY, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. § 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby
certifies in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Knology, Inc. (the Company) that, to his knowledge, this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (this Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: April 27, 2012 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Rodger L. Johnson  
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Rodger L. Johnson      
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

This exhibit shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the
date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.
Exhibit 4.2


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We have issued our
report dated April 14, 2020, with respect to the financial statement of Advisors Disciplined Trust 2008 contained in Amendment
No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-236189) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned
report in the Registration Statement and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Experts”.


 


	 	/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
	 	 
	Chicago, Illinois	 
	April 14, 2020
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00747-CV

Maxwell Ford, Ltd., d/b/a Maxwell Ford, Appellant

v.

Lisa L. Sayer, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. 275507, HONORABLE J. DAVID PHILLIPS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Maxwell Ford, Ltd., d/b/a Maxwell Ford and appellee Lisa L. Sayer have

filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion, set aside the trial court’s

judgment without regard to the merits, and remand the cause to the trial court for rendition of

judgment in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

__________________________________________

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: January 6, 2006