alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2009216EN.01000402.xml

| 10.9.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 216/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 216/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.5575 — ORBEO/Parts of Onecarbon)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2009/C 216/03

On 3 September 2009, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5575. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32009M5575. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2098 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2098

  To amend the Revised Statutes to grant State attorneys general the 
ability to issue subpoenas to investigate suspected violations of State 
              laws that are applicable to national banks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2019

 Mr. Schumer (for Ms. Harris (for herself, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Blumenthal, 
    Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Warren, Mrs. Gillibrand, and Mr. Merkley)) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Revised Statutes to grant State attorneys general the 
ability to issue subpoenas to investigate suspected violations of State 
              laws that are applicable to national banks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Accountability for Wall Street 
Executives Act''.

SEC. 2. VISITORIAL POWERS.

    The sixth undesignated paragraph of section 5240 of the Revised 
Statutes (12 U.S.C. 484) is amended by striking subparagraph (B) and 
inserting the following:
            ``(B) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A)--
                    ``(i) lawfully authorized State auditors and 
                examiners may, at reasonable times and upon reasonable 
                notice to a bank, review their records solely to ensure 
                compliance with applicable State unclaimed property or 
                escheat laws upon reasonable cause to believe that the 
                bank has failed to comply with such laws;
                    ``(ii) an attorney general (or other chief law 
                enforcement officer) of a State may issue subpoenas to 
                national banks or officers of national banks based upon 
                reasonable cause to believe that the national bank or 
                an officer of a national bank has failed to comply with 
                applicable State laws; and
                    ``(iii) an attorney general (or other chief law 
                enforcement officer) of a State may require a national 
                bank to provide aggregate data on loans and other 
                financial products and services provided by the 
                national bank in such State.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 6-4 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 6-4 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 6-4 Filed 05/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BRANDON WALKER PROSKE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 3393

[ July 20, 2023 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.

Lucie County ; Lawrence M. Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No.

562020CF002040A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Narine Austin, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C IKLIN

, G ERBER and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Cite as State v. Sanders , 2021-Ohio-2715.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE D ISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, Appellee,

- vs -

WESLEY LEONARDO SANDERS, Appellant. :

:

:

:

:

: CASE NO. CA2021-03-030

D E C I S I O N 8/9/2021

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER C OUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2020-09-1154

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, for appe llee. Engel & Martin, LLC, and Mary K. Martin, for appellant.

Per Curiam. {¶1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal fil ed by appellant, Wesley Leonardo Sanders, the transcript of the docke t and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler C ounty Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel. {¶2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any err ors by the trial courtButler CA2021-03-030 prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists three potential errors "that might arguably support t he appeal," Anders , at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record i ndependently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and wit hout infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to w ithdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellan t. {¶3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no res ponse having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal i s dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

PIPER, P.J., HENDRICKSON and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RALPH WARREN GOLDEN,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-113-MP -GRJ

WALTER MCNEIL,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 34, Respondent’s motion for an

extension of time to respond to the Petition. Upon due consideration, it is ORDERED:

1 That the motion for extension of time, Doc. 34, is GRANTED. Respondent

shall respond to the Petition on or before June 30, 2011.

2. Petitioner shall have until August 1, 2011, to file a reply, if any.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6 day of June 2011.

th

 

s/ Gary R. Jones

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00113-MP-GRJ Document 35 Filed 06/06/11 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [(NM-921-1301-FI-08); (OKNM 113435)]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the Class II provisions of Title IV, Public Law 97-451, and 43 CFR 3108.2-3, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement of Competitive oil and gas lease OKNM 113435 from the lessee, Greenwood Energy, Inc., for lands in Woods County, Oklahoma. The petition was filed on time and it was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bernadine T. Martinez, BLM,  New Mexico State Office, at (505) 438-7530.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    No valid lease has been issued that affect the lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $10.00 per acre or fraction thereof, per year, and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessee paid the required $500.00 administrative fee  for the reinstatement of the lease and $166.00 cost for publishing this Notice in the                     **Federal Register**                    . The lessee met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are proposing the reinstate lease OKNM 113435, effective the date of termination, March 1, 2007, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the increased rental and royalty rates cited above.                

Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that your comment—including your personal identifying information—may be made publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.

Dated: October 15, 2007.

Bernadine T. Martinez, 

Land Law Examiner.

[FR Doc. 07-5075 Filed 11-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-FB-M
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER **

**AND      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED **

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|                                        |                                                                                                                                                                             |                               |
|---------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|  Dated:                August 14, 2008 |                                                                                                                                                                             |
|                                   |                                                                                                                                                                        |                          |
|                                        | By:                                                                                                                                                                    | /s/                DOUGLAS A. DYER |
|                                        | Douglas                  A. Dyer President                    and Director (Principal                      Executive Officer) (Principal                      Financial Officer) |
|                                        |                                                                                                                                                                             |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

IN ADMIRALTY

In the Matter of: 

Capt. A III, Inc., owner of the 

vessel Capt. Anderson III, in 

cause of action for exoneration

from, or limited liability,

CASE NO. 5:10-cv-002/RS-MD

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Before me is the Mediation Settlement Report (Doc. 38). Pursuant to N.D. Fla. 

Loc. 16.2 it is ordered: 

1. The case is dismissed from the active docket of the court. 

2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves 

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this 

Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative purposes, 

and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is direct to 

close the case in its entirety for all purposes. 

ORDERED on October 25, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2009079EN.01000501.xml

| 2.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 79/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 79/5

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

1,50 % on 1 April 2009

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 April 2009

2009/C 79/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3246 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4482 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,92060 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,9303 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5106 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8850 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,151 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,81 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7092 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,5540 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,2282 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1782 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,9081 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6764 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2665 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,3525 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0161 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 817,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,4590 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0527 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4630 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 471,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8315 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,930 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,8790 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,043 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0572 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,5914 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,9850 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3246

JPY

Japanese yen

130,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4482

GBP

Pound sterling

0,92060

SEK

Swedish krona

10,9303

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5106

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8850

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,151

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,81

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7092

PLN

Polish zloty

4,5540

RON

Romanian leu

4,2282

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1782

AUD

Australian dollar

1,9081

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6764

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2665

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,3525

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0161

KRW

South Korean won

1 817,28

ZAR

South African rand

12,4590

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0527

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4630

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 471,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8315

PHP

Philippine peso

63,930

RUB

Russian rouble

44,8790

THB

Thai baht

47,043

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0572

MXN

Mexican peso

18,5914

INR

Indian rupee

66,9850

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source:

---
# C_2009084EN.01000301.xml

| 8.4.2009 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 April 2009

2009/C 84/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3255 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,80 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4486 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,90505 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,8780 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,5169 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8085 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 26,569 |
| EEK | Estonian kroon | 15,6466 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| LVL | Latvian lats | 0,7094 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4963 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,1655 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,1380 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,8715 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,6501 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2738 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 2,2998 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 2,0064 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 747,67 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,1835 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 9,0622 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4310 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 077,56 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7619 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 63,330 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 44,4790 |
| THB | Thai baht | 47,025 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9704 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,2323 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,3020 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3255

JPY

Japanese yen

132,80

DKK

Danish krone

7,4486

GBP

Pound sterling

0,90505

SEK

Swedish krona

10,8780

CHF

Swiss franc

1,5169

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8085

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

26,569

EEK

Estonian kroon

15,6466

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

LVL

Latvian lats

0,7094

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4963

RON

Romanian leu

4,1655

TRY

Turkish lira

2,1380

AUD

Australian dollar

1,8715

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,6501

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2738

NZD

New Zealand dollar

2,2998

SGD

Singapore dollar

2,0064

KRW

South Korean won

1 747,67

ZAR

South African rand

12,1835

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

9,0622

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4310

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 077,56

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7619

PHP

Philippine peso

63,330

RUB

Russian rouble

44,4790

THB

Thai baht

47,025

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9704

MXN

Mexican peso

18,2323

INR

Indian rupee

66,3020

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

EDWARD R. MILLER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-38-SPM/GRJ

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 30), which recommends that the

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 12) and Motion to Dismiss

(doc. 17) be granted. Plaintiff has been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Plaintiff, who is pro

se, filed an objection (doc. 31). Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code,

Section 636(b)(1), I have conducted a de novo review of the sections of the

report to which objections have been made. I find that the Report and

Recommendation is correct and should be adopted.

Plaintiff raised several objections to the Report and Recommendation, all

of which should be denied. First, Plaintiff’s claim against an unidentified United

Case 1:10-cv-00038-SPM-GRJ Document 33 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 2
States Marshal must be dismissed as barred by the Statute of Limitations,

regardless of whether her identity could somehow be determined. Plaintiff was

not prevented from bringing his claim within the statutory period. Additionally, the

breadth of New York’s long arm statute is immaterial, as it is Florida’s long arm

statute, which was properly considered by the Magistrate Judge, that is

applicable. Moreover, Plaintiff’s asserted health problems do not excuse his

failure to serve process on the defendant jails within the 120 days provided in the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Plaintiff did not request an extension of

time to do so until after the Report and Recommendation was issued. Justice

does not require that the Plaintiff be allowed to amend the complaint or that an

extension of time for service of process be granted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 30) is

adopted and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. All claims in this matter are dismissed.

3. The clerk is directed to enter final judgment against Plaintiff on all

claims and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this fourth day of May, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

2

Case 1:10-cv-00038-SPM-GRJ Document 33 Filed 05/05/11 Page 2 of 2