Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 31, 2007 / Notices 61679 

period, the decree may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/open.html. A copy 

of the decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611, or 

by faxing or a-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

information number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please refer to United 

States of America and the State of 

Tennessee v. Metropolitan Government 

of Nashville and Davidson County, 

(proposed Consent Decree, DOJ Ref. No. 

90–5–1–1–09000), and enclose a check 

in the amount of $68.50 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, 

forward a check in that amount to the 

Consent Decree Library at the stated 

address. 

Henry S. Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 07–5416 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Proposed Consent Decree 

Under the Park System Resource 

Protection Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

September 17, 2007, a proposed consent 

decree in United States v. Nuthen’s 

Purfect, Inc., Civil Action No. 06–cv–

22249, was lodged with the United 

States District Court for the Southern 

District of Florida. 

In this action, filed pursuant to the 

Park System Resource Protection Act 

(‘‘PSRPA’’), 16 U.S.C. 19jj et seq., the 

United States sought response costs and 

damages against Nuthen’s Purfect, Inc. 

(‘‘Nuthen’s Purfect’’) due to a vessel 

grounding that occurred in the 

Everglades National Park on April 18, 

2002. The United States Department of 

Justice, on behalf of the U.S. Department 

of the Interior, National Park Service 

(‘‘DOI’’), has reached a settlement with 

Nuthen’s Purfect regarding these claims. 

Pursuant to the Consent Decree, the 

United States will recover $50,000. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to the 

Consent Decree between the United 

States and Nuthen’s Purfect, DOJ Ref. 

No. 90–5–1–1–08521. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the Everglades National 

Park, 40001 State Road 9336, 

Homestead, FL 33034, and at the 

Department of the Interior, Office of the 

Solicitor, Southeast Regional Office, 

Richard B. Russell Federal Building, 75 

Spring Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 

30303. During the public comment 

period, the Consent Decree may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $3.25 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, 

forward a check in that amount to the 

Consent Decree Library at the stated 

address. 

Henry S. Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 07–5417 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Proposed Consent Decree 

Pursuant to the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation and Liability Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

September 18, 2007, a proposed consent 

decree in United States v. Theochem 

Laboratories, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 

4:06–cv–00214, was lodged with the 

United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Florida. 

In this action, filed pursuant to the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act, the United States sought 

reimbursement of its remaining 

outstanding incurred response costs 

relating to the Davis Refining Superfund 

Site, which is located in Tallahassee, 

Florida. The United States Department 

of Justice, on behalf of the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency, has 

reached a settlement with Theochem 

Laboratories, Inc. (‘‘Theochem’’) 

regarding the filed claim. Pursuant to 

the Consent Decree, the United States 

will recover $175,000 from Theochem. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of thirty (30) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

relating to the Consent Decree. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to the 

Consent Decree between the United 

States and Theochem Laboratories, Inc., 

DOJ Ref. No. 90–11–3–08056/2. 

The proposed Consent Decree may be 

examined at the United States 

Attorney’s Office, Northern District of 

Florida, 111 N. Adams Street, 4th Floor, 

Tallahassee, FL 32301, and at the 

United States Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, 

SW., Atlanta, GA 30303. During the 

public comment period, the Consent 

Decree may also be examined on the 

following Department of Justice Web 

site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax no. (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library please enclose a check in 

the amount of $5.50 (25 cents per page 

reproduction cost) payable to the U.S. 

Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, forward 

a check in that amount to the Consent 

Decree Library at the stated address. 

Henry S. Friedman, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 07–5415 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Proposed Termination of Judgment 

Notice is hereby given that defendant 

Hilton Hotels Corp. (‘‘Hilton’’) and 

Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide 

Inc. (‘‘Starwood’’), a successor in 

interest to both defendant ITT Sheraton 

Corporation of America (‘‘Sheraton’’) 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
61680 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 210 / Wednesday, October 31, 2007 / Notices 

and defendant Western International 

Hotel Corporation (‘‘Westin’’), have filed 

a motion to terminate the Partial Final 

Judgment entered in United States v. 

Greater Portland Convention 

Association, Inc., et al., Civil No. 70–

310, 1971 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶73,731 

(D.Or. 1971) on November 29, 1971 

(‘‘Partial Final Judgment’’) and the Final 

Judgment entered in United States v. 

Greater Portland Convention 

Association, Inc., et al., Civil No. 70–

310, 1973 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶74,614 

(D.Or. 1973) on September 14, 1973 

(‘‘Final Judgment’’). Notice is also 

hereby given that the Antitrust Division 

of the United States Department of 

Justice (‘‘the Department’’), in a 

stipulation also filed with the Court, has 

tentatively consented to termination of 

the Partial Final Judgment and the Final 

Judgment, but has reserved the right to 

withdraw its consent pending receipt of 

public comments. 

On May 12, 1970, the United States 

filed a complaint alleging the 

defendants had conspired to restrain 

trade and commerce in the distribution 

and sale of hotel supplies. Essentially, 

the complaint charged the defendants 

with agreeing (i) to assess an amount of 

money fixed by the hotels to be paid to 

GPCA as contributions by hotel 

suppliers, (ii) to give preference in the 

purchase of hotel supplies to any hotel 

supplier who did so contribute, and (iii) 

to curtail purchases from any hotel 

supplier who failed or refused to 

contribute money to the GPCA. 

Prior to trial, four of the five 

defendants; Hilton, GPCA, ITT 

Sheraton, and Cosmopolitan Investment 

Inc., settled the charges by accepting 

entry of the Partial Final Judgment on 

November 29, 1971. The fifth hotel 

defendant, Westin, was tried by jury 

from November 30–December 4, 1970. 

The jury found that Westin had violated 

§ 1 of the Sherman Act, and Westin 

appealed this decision to the Ninth 

Circuit. United States v. Hilton Hotels 

Corporation., et al. 467 F.2d 1000 (9th 

Cir. 1972) cert. denied, 93 S.Ct. 938 

(1973). On September 26, 1972, the 

Ninth Circuit affirmed. Westin entered 

into the Final Judgment on September 

14, 1973. 

The Department has filed with the 

Court a memorandum setting forth the 

reasons why the United States believes 

that termination of the Partial Final 

Judgment would serve the public 

interest. Copies of the motion to 

terminate, the stipulation containing the 

United States’ tentative consent, the 

United States’ memorandum, and all 

further papers filed with the Court in 

connection with the motion to terminate 

will be available for inspection at the 

Antitrust Documents Group, Antitrust 

Division, Room 215, 325 7th Street, 

NW., Washington, DC 20004, on the 

Web site www.usdoj.gov/atr, and at the 

Office of the Clerk of the United States 

District Court for the District of Oregon. 

Copies of these materials may be 

obtained from the Antitrust Division 

upon request and payment of the 

copying fee set by the Department of 

Justice regulations. 

Interested persons may submit 

comments regarding the proposed 

termination of the Partial Final 

Judgment and the Final Judgment to the 

United States. Such comments must be 

received by the Antitrust Division 

within sixty (60) days and will be filed 

with the Court by the United States. 

Comments should be addressed to John 

R. Read, Chief, Litigation III Section, 

Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of 

Justice, 325 7th Street, NW., Suite 300, 

Washington, DC 20530, (202) 307–0468. 

J. Robert Kramer II, 

Director of Operations. 

[FR Doc. 07–5390 Filed 10–30–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Office of Justice Programs 

[OMB Number 1121–0223] 

National Institute of Justice; Agency 

Information Collection Activities: 

Proposed Collection; Comments 

Requested 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: 

Reinstatement—Crime Mapping Survey. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Office of Justice Programs (OJP), 

National Institute of Justice (NIJ) will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. Comments 

are encouraged and will be accepted for 

‘‘sixty days’’ until December 31, 2007. 

This process is conducted in accordance 

with 5 CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Ronald E. Wilson, 

National Institute of Justice, 810 7th 

Street, NW., Washington, DC 25301. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection: 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Reinstatement with Change. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Crime 

Mapping Survey. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: None. Office of Research and 

Evaluation, National Institute of Justice, 

Office of Justice Programs, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: Law Enforcement 

Agencies. Other: None. This national 

survey is designed to do three things. 

One is to determine the extent to which 

police departments, specifically crime 

analysts, are utilizing computerized 

crime mapping since the first survey. 

Two is to understand to what extent 

crime mapping has been adopted since 

the first survey. Three is to expand the 

survey to understand the new ways that 

computerized crime mapping is being 

utilized, including the technologies 

adopted. Surveys will be mailed to a 

randomly select sample of police 

departments. The questionnaire will 

determine the level of crime mapping 

within those departments, both in terms 

of hardware and software resources as 

well as the data used and types of maps 

that are produced and how they are 

used. The information collected from 

this survey will be used to advise the 

Mapping and Analysis for Public Safety 

(formerly the Crime Mapping Research 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES