alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James F. Deupree *et al.,*executors, plaintiffs in error, *vs.*Lucy Y. Deupree *et al.,*caveators, defendants in error.

(McCay, Justice, did not preside upon the hearing of the following motion.)

1. Where one of the executors of a will to which a caveat has been filed married the sister of the wife of one of the Judges of the Supreme Court, said Judge is not disqualified from presiding by reason of relationship by affinity to said executor, upon the trial of said cause before the Supreme Court. (R.)

2. The executor having renounced in writing as executor of the will to the Ordinary, which renunciation had been entered of record before qualification as executor and during the pendency of a caveat to the probate of said will, such renunciation was binding on the executor, and the Ordinary was the proper officer to determine whether he had any of the assets of the estate in his hands, not accounted for at the time of such renunciation. (R.)

3. The legal, presumption is, that the Ordinary performed his duty in regard to the protection of the assets of the estate before accepting the renunciation of one of the executors nominated in the will. (R.)

Relationship to disqualify Judge. Renunciation by executor. Before the Supreme Court of Georgia. January Term, 1872.

When this case was called in the Supreme Court, counsel for plaintiffs in error objected to Justice McCay’s refusing to preside, on the ground that Thomas B. Moss, executor, one of the plaintiffs in error, had married the sister of his wife, and tendered to the Court the renunciation of said Moss of the trust conferred upon him by his appointment as executor, duly certified to by the Ordinary of Oglethorpe county. The Court, after taking the matter under consideration, rendered the following decision.

Linton Stephens; Peoples & Stewart; Reed *&*Morton, for the objection.

Robert Toombs; J. D. Matthews, *contra.*

*415Warner, Chief Justice.

When it appeared that Moss, one of the executors of Deupree, married the sister of the wife of Judge McCay: *Held,*that the Judge was not related to Moss by affinity, so as to prevent him from presiding in the case, under the provisions of the 193d section of the Code. *Held, also,*that Moss having renounced as executor of the will, to the Ordinary, in writing, which renunciation had been entered on his records, before qualification as executor, and during the pendency of a *caveat*against the probate of the will, that such renunciation was binding on the executor, and that the Ordinary was the proper officer to determine whether he had any of the assets of the estate in his hands not accounted for at the time of his renunciation, it being the legal presumption that the Ordinary performed his duty in regard to that matter, for the protection of the estate, before accepting his renunciation as one of the nominated executors of the will.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.3
 GRACECHURCH RECEIVABLES TRUSTEE LIMITED
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Receivables Trustee Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement.
 By: /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:
    
    Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:
    
    DirectorDate:
    
    June 23, 2006
 - 28 -
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 2) PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 I, Paul Gerard Turner, certify that:  1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 2) PLC;2.

Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.

I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.

The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement. By:
    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:
    Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:
    DirectorDate:
    June 30, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; Pathway to Independence Award.                    

*Date:*                         October 30, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jose F. Ruiz, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 6101 Executive Blvd., Rm. 213, MSC 8401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-451-3086,                         *ruizjf@nida.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 5, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 

[FR Doc. 07-5087 Filed 10-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 206 (Thursday, October 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 60691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5280]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[CA-310-0777-XG]


Notice of Public Meeting: Northwest California Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
of 1976 (FLPMA), and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), 
the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) 
Northwest California Resource Advisory Council will meet as indicated 
below.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday and Thursday, Dec. 5 and 6, 
2007. On December 5, the council members convene at 9 a.m. in the 
Abalone Room at the Little River Inn, 7751 Highway 1, Little River, CA. 
Time for public comment has been set aside for 11 a.m. On May 6, the 
council convenes at 7:30 a.m. at the Little River Inn and departs for a 
tour to discuss management of the California Coastal National Monument 
and the Stornetta Public Lands. Members of the public are welcome on 
the tour, but they must provide their own transportation and lunch.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rich Burns, BLM Ukiah Field Office 
manager, (707) 468-4000; or BLM Public Affairs Officer Joseph J. 
Fontana, (530) 252-5332.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 12-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of planning and 
management issues associated with public land management in Northwest 
California. At this meeting, agenda topics include an update on 
management proposals for the Sacramento River Bend, a discussion of 
funding needs for BLM's northern California projects, status reports on 
management plan development for Lacks Creek and the Cow Mountain 
National Recreation Area and a report on legislation affecting the 
California off highway vehicle recreation program. Members will also 
hear status reports on activities in the Arcata, Redding and Ukiah 
field offices and the California Coastal National Monument. All 
meetings are open to the public. Members of the public may present 
written comments to the council. Each formal council meeting will have 
time allocated for public comments. Depending on the number of persons 
wishing to speak, and the time available, the time for individual 
comments may be limited. Members of the public are welcome on field 
tours, but they must provide their own transportation and lunch. 
Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as 
sign language interpretation and other reasonable accommodations, 
should contact the BLM as provided above.

    Dated: October 19, 2007.
Joseph J. Fontana,
Public Affairs Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-5280 Filed 10-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Liberty Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

|                                                    |  |                                                           
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Hayne Hipp                                      |  | /s/ Howard L. Schrott                                     
|                                                    |  |                                                           
|Hayne Hipp
Chief Executive Officer
November 5, 2003 |  | Howard L. Schrott
Chief Financial Officer
November 5, 2003

17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORP., 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-71/RS-CJK

KARA-O-KING INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are the Show Cause Order (Doc. 60) and Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. 

61). 

Permissive joinder allows multiple defendants to be joined in one action if the 

right to relief arises “out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or 

occurrences” and “any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise in the 

action.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). 

Here, it is clear that common questions of law predominate. Plaintiff represents 

that common questions of fact will also be at issue with only “time and place” 

differences. However, these “time and place” differences make inappropriate the joinder 

of parties who reside throughout the state’s three districts. Permissive joinder is a 

doctrine of discretion, not of plaintiff’s right. Its justification lies in considerations of 

judicial economy, convenience and fairness to litigants. Alexander v. Fulton County, 207

F.3d 1303, 1323 (11th Cir. 2000) (Citing United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715, 

Case 5:10-cv-00071-RS-CJK Document 62 Filed 07/07/11 Page 1 of 2
726 (1966). Quite simply, it is unfair to require defendants who reside in the Southern 

District and the Middle District to be hailed to court in the Northern District. I intend to 

sever those defendants who reside in a different district and/or those defendant where

Plaintiff has alleged that a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred 

in a different district. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 

Plaintiff shall file a particularized report which (1) identifies the district in which 

each defendant resides and (2) identifies the district(s) where a substantial part of the 

events giving rise to the claim occurred for each of the Defendants – i.e., the location(s) 

where the defendants have allegedly used the trademark infringing products. 

This report shall be filed not later than July 21, 2011. 

ORDERED on July 7, 2011.

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:10-cv-00071-RS-CJK Document 62 Filed 07/07/11 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.3
 RECEIVABLES TRUSTEES OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
 GRACECHURCH RECEIVABLES TRUSTEE LIMITED
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the Receivables Trustee;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the Receivables Trustee; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Receivables Trustee has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of the Investor Certificate for the period between January 1, 2005 and
December 31, 2005.
   By:

    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:   Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:     Director
 - 31 -
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 28, 2009

p0420 

# Order

April 28, 2009

138124

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138124 COA: 288963 Lapeer CC: 07-009309-FC BENJAMIN IVAN ANDERSEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 15, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,926
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,435
<ALLOWANCES>                                       419
<INVENTORY>                                     11,325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,815
<PP&E>                                          18,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,356
<BONDS>                                          1,150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,572
<SALES>                                          7,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,540
<CGS>                                            7,252
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    25
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,469)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (477)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (992)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (992)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)
        

</TABLE>
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

REGIONS BANK

vs

MOTOR YACHT ROYAL INDULGENCE,

et al.,

Case No. 3:10cv100/LAC/EMT

ORDER

The “Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures of Danny L. McCray,” received by the clerk of the court on

September 28, 2010, was referred to the undersigned with the following deficiency:

Defendant McCray’s attention is directed to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(d),

which prohibits the filing of discovery materials (including depositions,

interrogatories, requests for documents or tangible things or to permit entry onto

land, and requests for admission) and disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1), unless and

until needed for consideration of pending motions by the court. 

For this reason, it is ORDERED that:

The submitted hard copy of the document shall be returned to Defendant McCray

without electronic filing.

NOTICE TO PRO SE PARTY

Defendant McCray, who proceeds pro se in this case, is advised that, as required by

Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520, 92 S. Ct. 594, 595–96, 30 L. Ed. 2d 652 (1972),

pleadings filed pro se are interpreted more liberally than those filed by counsel. 

Accordingly, pleadings or other papers that are represented as being pro se in nature

but in actuality have been drafted by an attorney can provide the purportedly

unrepresented party an unfair advantage in that his pleadings are construed liberally

while those filed by a party with counsel is held to a higher level of scrutiny. 

Moreover, this sort of “ghost-writing” has been deemed a deliberate evasion of the

responsibilities imposed on counsel by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and, as
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 2 of 2

such, has been widely condemned as unethical. See, e.g., Duran v. Carris, 238 F.3d

1268, 1273 (10th Cir. 2001); Ellis v. Maine, 448 F.2d 1325, 1328 (1st Cir. 1971);

Bush v. Adams, 2010 WL 1253990 (E.D. Va. 2010); Wesley v. Don Stein Buick,

Inc., 987 F. Supp. 884, 886 (D. Kan. 1997); Ricotta v. State, 4 F. Supp. 2d 961, 987

(S.D. Cal.1998); Gold v. Dalkon Shield Claimant’s Trust, 1998 WL 422900 (D.

Conn. 1998). Thus, if Defendant McCray has retained counsel in connection with

proceedings before this court, counsel should conduct him or herself appropriately,

i.e., by entering an appearance.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of October 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 3:10cv100/LAC/EMT