alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1A



KEWAUNEE SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MEETING



MARCH 22, 2005



PENSION PLAN RESOLUTION



RESOLVED, that the Corporations Re-established Retirement Plan for
Salaried Employees of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation be amended to incorporate the Board of Directors February 22, 2005, decision to freeze the Plan. The amendments shall provide for the following:



| |  |  | As of April 30, 2005, no further benefit accruals will be earned under the Plan.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | As of April 30, 2005, participants will become 100% vested under the Plan.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | As of April 30, 2005, no other employees shall become participants in the Plan.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Notwithstanding the freeze, the Plan will continue to comply in form and operation with 401(a) and the applicable provisions of ERISA.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



FURTHER RESOLVED, that said amendments shall be implemented as soon as administratively
feasible after the adoption of the foregoing resolution. (Targeted implementation date is April 30, 2005.)



FURTHER RESOLVED, that the officers of the Corporation are authorized to take such action as they may determine to be necessary or appropriate to implement the foregoing resolutions.
Walter Mortgage s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 23, 2014

No. 04-14-00707-CV

Melissa BROQUET and John Broquet,

Appellants

v.

WALTER MORTGAGE COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-12-60-A

Judge Robert Blackmon, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant filed two notices of appeal seeking to appeal a trial court’s order confirming an 

arbitration award. The order was severed from the original cause number DC-12-60 and 

assigned cause number DC-12-60-A. Appellant filed a notice of appeal in both the original 

cause number, which was assigned appeal number 04-14-00706-CV, and in the severed cause 

number, which was assigned appeal number 04-14-00707-CV. Because the notice of appeal was 

appropriately filed in the severed cause number, it is ORDERED that appeal number 04-14-

00706-CV shall be administratively closed, and the appeal shall proceed in appeal number 04-

14-00707-CV.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of October, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
| /s/  Steven L.      Watson                 |   | /s/  Bobby D.      O’Brien              |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Steven      L. WatsonPresident      and Chief Executive OfficerAugust      6, 2008                                                   |   | Bobby      D. O’BrienVice      President andChief      Financial OfficerAugust      6, 2008                        |
#### STATE v. PETERSON

No. 469P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 240.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S.. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982.
# C_2011264EN.01001901.xml

| 8.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 264/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 264/19

---

Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2012 under certain quotas opened by the Community for products in the poultrymeat sector

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 264/09

Commission Regulation (EC) No 616/2007 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of products in the poultrymeat sector. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of July 2011 for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2011, in respect of quotas 09.4212, 09.4214, 09.4217 and 09.4218, are for quantities lower than those available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 January to 31 March 2012; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.

1

2

---

(1)  OJ L 142, 5.6.2007, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

| Quota order number | Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2012
  (in kg) |
| --- | --- |
| 09.4212 | 55 566 000 |
| 09.4214 | 6 449 200 |
| 09.4217 | 17 003 000 |
| 09.4218 | 6 957 600 |

Quota order number

Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2012

(in kg)

09.4212

55 566 000

09.4214

6 449 200

09.4217

17 003 000

09.4218

6 957 600

---
# C_2011099EN.01003801.xml

| 31.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/38

---

Notice concerning the anti-dumping measures in force in respect of imports into the Union of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in China extended to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in Korea or not: change of address of a company exempted from the extended measures

2011/C 99/07

The anti-dumping duty in force on imports of steel ropes and cables originating, inter alia, in China imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1858/2005 (1) was extended to imports of steel ropes and cables consigned from the Republic of Korea, whether declared as originating in Korea or not, by Implementing Regulation of the Council (EU) No 400/2010 (2) (‘Regulation (EU) No 400/2010’).

1

2

Bosung Wire Rope Co. Ltd, a company located in the Republic of Korea, whose exports to the Union of steel ropes and cables were exempted from the extended anti-dumping duty pursuant to Article 1 of Regulation (EU) No 400/2010, has informed the European Commission (‘the Commission’) that on 3 January 2011 it changed its address.

The company has argued that the change of address does not affect its right to benefit from the individual duty rate applied to it under its previous address of:

| 972-5 Songhyun-Ri |
| --- |
| Jinrae-Myeun |
| Kimhae-Si |
| Gyeungsangnam-Do |
| DAEHANMINGUK/REPUBLIC OF KOREA |

972-5 Songhyun-Ri

Jinrae-Myeun

Kimhae-Si

Gyeungsangnam-Do

DAEHANMINGUK/REPUBLIC OF KOREA

The company submitted sufficient evidence to establish that the change of the address was due to insufficient space in its former location.

The Commission has examined the information provided and has concluded that the change of address in no way affects the findings of Regulation (EU) No 400/2010. Therefore, the reference in Article 1(1) of Regulation (EU) No 400/2010 to:

| Bosung Wire Rope Co. Ltd |
| --- |
| 972-5 Songhyun-Ri |
| Jinrae-Myeun |
| Kimhae-Si |
| Gyeungsangnam-Do |
| DAEHANMINGUK/REPUBLIC OF KOREA |

Bosung Wire Rope Co. Ltd

972-5 Songhyun-Ri

Jinrae-Myeun

Kimhae-Si

Gyeungsangnam-Do

DAEHANMINGUK/REPUBLIC OF KOREA

should be read as:

| Bosung Wire Rope Co. Ltd |
| --- |
| 568 Yongdeok-ri |
| Hallim-myeon |
| Gimhae-si |
| Gyeongsangnam-do |
| 621-872 |
| DAEHANMINGUK/REPUBLIC OF KOREA |

Bosung Wire Rope Co. Ltd

568 Yongdeok-ri

Hallim-myeon

Gimhae-si

Gyeongsangnam-do

621-872

DAEHANMINGUK/REPUBLIC OF KOREA

The TARIC additional code A969 shall apply to:

| Bosung Wire Rope Co. Ltd |
| --- |
| 568 Yongdeok-ri |
| Hallim-myeon |
| Gimhae-si |
| Gyeongsangnam-do |
| 621-872 |
| DAEHANMINGUK/REPUBLIC OF KOREA |

Bosung Wire Rope Co. Ltd

568 Yongdeok-ri

Hallim-myeon

Gimhae-si

Gyeongsangnam-do

621-872

DAEHANMINGUK/REPUBLIC OF KOREA

---

(1)  OJ L 299, 16.11.2005, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 117, 11.5.2010, p. 1.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,578,609
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,835,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                   185,000
<INVENTORY>                                 20,279,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,020,978
<PP&E>                                      14,999,508
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,925,826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,094,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,699,526
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          496,275
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,126,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,094,660
<SALES>                                     27,822,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,836,946
<CGS>                                       16,644,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,049,138
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,777,502
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,111,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,666,502
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,666,502
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of

Infonet Services Corporation

El Segundo, California



We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Infonet Services Corporation and its subsidiaries as of March 31,
2003 and 2004, and for each of the three years in the period ended March 31, 2004, and have issued our report thereon dated June 15, 2004 (included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Our audits also included the financial statement
schedule listed in Item 15. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.



|                         
|-------------------------
|                         
|                         
|/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
|Deloitte & Touche LLP    



Los Angeles, California

June 15, 2004



SCHEDULE II



INFONET
SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



|                                                     |  |                              |        |                             |   |                            |  |            |        |                        |   |        |  |   |       
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | ------ | --------------------------- | - | -------------------------- |  | ---------- | ------ | ---------------------- | - | ------ |  | - | ------
|DESCRIPTION                                          |  | BALANCE ATBEGINNINGOF PERIOD |        | CHARGED TOCOSTS ANDEXPENSES |   | CHARGEDTO OTHERACCOUNTS(1) |  | DEDUCTIONS |        | BALANCE ATEND OFPERIOD
|Allowance for doubtful accounts and customer credits |  |                              |        |                             |   |                            |  |            |        |                        |   |        |  |   |       
|2002                                                 |  | $                            | 13,855 |                             | $ | 759                        |  | $          | 436    |                        | $ | 120    |  | $ | 14,930
|2003                                                 |  |                              | 14,930 |                             |   | 7,059                      |  |            | 3,396  |                        |   | 7,720  |  |   | 17,665
|2004                                                 |  |                              | 17,665 |                             |   | 1,179                      |  |            | 11,219 |                        |   | 10,716 |  |   | 19,347

---

|(1) |  | Represents amounts charged against revenues.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

OBANY COELLON ROCA,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00044-MP-WCS

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 18, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the petition be dismissed as moot. The time for filing

objections has passed, and none have been filed. The Court agrees that since the detainer on

Petitioner has been removed, the petition is now moot. Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. The Petition is dismissed as moot, and the Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of September, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through

Attorney General Pam Bondi, et al.;

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER DIRECTING EXPEDITED FILING

On January 31, 2011, I entered an order granting summary judgment in

favor of the plaintiffs (in part) and declaring unconstitutional the individual mandate

provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Because I determined

that the individual mandate could not be severed from the remainder of the Act, it

was also necessary to declare the entire statute void. The defendants have now,

two and one-half weeks later, filed a motion to “clarify” that order (doc. 156). They

have represented that the plaintiffs oppose their motion.

Under the Local Rules of this court, the plaintiffs would ordinarily have

fourteen (14) days in which to file a response to the defendants’ motion. However,

because time is of the essence in this matter, and because everyone in this country

would obviously benefit from certainty and final resolution of the case sooner

rather than later, I do not think it necessary or appropriate to adhere to the briefing

schedule that would normally apply. 

Accordingly, from the date of this Order, the plaintiffs shall have three (3)

business days in which to file their response in opposition to the defendants’

motion. If the defendants wish to file a reply to that response, they shall also have

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV -EMT Document 157 Filed 02/18/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

three (3) business days from the date the response is filed. I will promptly consider

the motion and their memoranda at that time. 

DONE and ORDERED this 18th day of February, 2011.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case No.: 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV -EMT Document 157 Filed 02/18/11 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.1



I, Richard R. Walters, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's most recent fiscal quarter (Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's auditors and the audit committee of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's board of directors:

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys internal control over financial reporting.



Date: May 12, 2006





By   /s/ Richard R. Walters



Richard R. Walters, President











1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 5730]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-521]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended 5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the pubic in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, NIAID Specimen Repository.
    Date: February 23, 2007.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: Marriott Bethesda North Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 
Marinelli Road, North Bethesda, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: Eugene R. Baizman, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge 
Drive, MSC 7616, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-1464, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f5a5d0d0c085a7f51565711585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e7b7c2c2d297b5e70777630797168">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 30, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-521 Filed 2-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>