alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              28
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                        90
<INVENTORY>                                      2,681
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,988
<PP&E>                                           1,513
<DEPRECIATION>                                     938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,798
<BONDS>                                              2
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,296
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,230)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,312
<SALES>                                          8,644
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,775
<CGS>                                            6,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    975
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (19)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                994
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     94
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,088
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
<FN>
<F1>Bad debt expense of (147) is included in the 2,253 reported as Selling and
Administrative expenses.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
      32








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Lescarden Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10
      QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William E. Luther,
      Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.









/s/
                William E. LutherWilliam
                E. LutherChief
                Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerOctober
                3, 2007
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-30175

Conference Calendar

 

JEAN ALLEN ROUX,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, Warden, 

Louisiana State Penitentiary,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-618

- - - - - - - - - -

August 18, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jean Allen Roux, #109227, requests that this court grant him

a certificate of appealability (COA) from the denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Because Roux filed his § 2254 petition

in March 1997, the COA requirement of the Antiterrorism and

Effective Death Penalty Act applies to his case. Green v.

Johnson, 116 F.3d 1115, 1119-20 (5th Cir. 1997). A COA may be
No. 98-30175

-2-

issued only if the prisoner has made a "substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right." § 2253(c)(2).

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on

its own motion, if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660

(5th Cir. 1987). A timely notice of appeal is a prerequisite for

the exercise of jurisdiction by this court. United States v.

Carr, 979 F.2d 51, 55 (5th Cir. 1992). Rule 4(a)(1), FED. R. APP.

P., requires that the notice of appeal in a civil action be filed

within 30 days of entry of the judgment or order from which

appeal is taken. 

A prisoner's pro se notice of appeal is deemed filed when

delivered to the prison authorities for mailing to the court

clerk. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266

(1988). "Timely filing may be shown by a notarized statement or

by a declaration [under penalty of perjury] setting forth the

date of deposit and stating that first-class postage has been

prepaid." Fed. R. App. P. 4(c). Roux’s notice of appeal

contained no notarized statement or declaration under penalty of

perjury setting forth the date it was submitted for mailing and

that first-class postage had been prepaid as required by Fed.

R. App. P. 4(c). Because it cannot be determined from the record

when Roux delivered the notice of appeal to prison authorities,

the case is REMANDED to the district court to make such a

determination. See Thompson v. Montgomery, 853 F.2d 287, 288

(5th Cir. 1988). The court should make the determination
No. 98-30175

-3-

promptly and return the case to this court for dismissal or

further processing, as may be appropriate.

REMANDED.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:01cr50LAC

PAULA WOODS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on February 28, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: REQUEST FOR APPOINTED COUNSEL and REQUEST TO PROCEED

WITH CONSIDERATION (as a result of the Amended Guideline Range effective 11/1/07) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on2/21/08 Doc.# 39

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 1st day of

April, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The defendant was sentenced as a career criminal. The defendant is not

affected by Amendment 706 because of the impact of the Career Offender provision

and the fact she was facing a statutory minimum mandatory term of Life

imprisonment as to Count I. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:01-cr-00050-LC Document 41 Filed 04/01/08 Page 1 of 1
#### BANK v. BAKER

No. 104 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 388.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 January 1980.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

## Agenda

# *Time and Date:*

9:30 a.m., Thursday, November 8, 2007.

# *Place:*

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# Status:

The one item is open to the public.

# **Matter to be Considered:**

5299Z Most Wanted Transportation Safety Improvements—November 2007 Progress Report and Update on Federal Issues.

# News Media Contact:

Telephone: (202) 316-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, November 2, 2007.

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *www.ntsb.gov*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: October 26, 2007.

Vicky D'Onofrio,

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-5411 Filed 10-26-07; 1:33 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
# Fire Prevention Week, 2007

During Fire Prevention Week, we reaffirm our commitment to raising awareness about fire safety and prevention, and we salute our country's firefighters who perform heroic acts to keep their fellow citizens safe. 

Fires injure or kill thousands of people each year. Americans can help reduce the devastating effects of fires with careful planning and by installing smoke alarms and fire extinguishers in their homes and workplaces. This year's theme, “Practice Your Escape Plan,” highlights the importance of creating a fire escape plan and knowing the routes to quickly exit a burning building. By taking these special precautions, lives can be saved. 

America's firefighters demonstrate the true meaning of heroism by taking great risks to safeguard our communities. During Fire Prevention Week, we honor our selfless firefighters and underscore the importance of fire safety. We also pay special tribute to those who have fallen in the line of duty. Our country is grateful for their service and sacrifice, and we pray for God's comfort and strength for their loved ones. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 7 through October 13, 2007, as Fire Prevention Week. On Sunday, October 7, 2007, in accordance with Public Law 107-51, the flag of the United States will be flown at half staff on all Federal office buildings in honor of the National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Service. I call on all Americans to participate in this observance through appropriate programs and activities and by renewing their efforts to prevent fires and their tragic consequences. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07-5020

Billing code 3195-01-P
Exhibit 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Thomas  Cooke,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the Annual
Report of Saratoga  Resources,  Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December
31, 1999 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that  information  contained  in such Form
10-KSB  fairly  presents in all material  respects the  financial  condition and
results of operations of Saratoga Resources, Inc.


                                           By:    /s/ Thomas Cooke
                                                  _____________________________
                                           Name:  Thomas Cooke
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                           Dated: July 8, 2005
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILLIAM JOSEPH WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv119-SPM/WCS

WALTER A. MCNEIL, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated May 6, 2010 (doc. 7). Plaintiff has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). Plaintiff has notified the Court that he has no objections and that he

intends to pursue a habeas corpus claim. Having considered the report and

recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should

be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 7) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief

may be granted. The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff’s opportunity to
Page 2 of 2

pursue a habeas corpus claim.

3. The clerk shall note on the docket that this case was dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of June, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 4:10cv119-SPM/WCS
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

KATRINA HOUSER,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 14-132 (JEB)

SSI,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Plaintiff Katrina Houser filed a one-sentence pro se Complaint in D.C. Superior Court on 

October 29, 2013, which states in full: “Did not get money for Nov-Dec 2012 none pay from 

SSI-IDA- Lawsuit [sic].” ECF No. 1 (Notice of Removal), Attach. 2 (Complaint). After the 

Social Security Administration removed the case to this Court, it filed a Motion to Dismiss. See

ECF No. 6. On March 13, 2014, the Court issued an Order directing Plaintiff to respond to the 

Motion by April 3 or risk the Court’s deeming the matter conceded. See ECF No. 7. As Plaintiff 

has not done so, the Court will treat the Motion as conceded and dismiss the case without 

prejudice. See LCvR 7(b). A contemporaneous Order will so state.

 

 /s/ James E. Boasberg 

 JAMES E. BOASBERG

 United States District Judge

Date: April 9, 2014
Case 1:07-cr-00257-SAS     Document 10      Filed 10/29/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-9 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-9 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-9 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-9 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-9 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-9 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-9 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 7 of 7
# C_2011094EN.01002201.xml

| 26.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/22

---

Publication concerning Irish Nationwide Building Society pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions

2011/C 94/15

IN THE MATTER OF IRISH NATIONWIDE BUILDING SOCIETY (‘INBS’) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CREDIT INSTITUTIONS (STABILISATION) ACT, 2010

IN THE MATTER OF IRISH NATIONWIDE BUILDING SOCIETY (‘INBS’) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CREDIT INSTITUTIONS (STABILISATION) ACT, 2010

The High Court of Ireland did on 24 February 2011 make a transfer order pursuant to Section 34 of the Act in the following terms:

| | Transferring assets and liabilities of INBS as set out in the said order to Irish Life & Permanent plc (‘ILP’), a credit institution licensed in Ireland. |
| --- | --- |

Transferring assets and liabilities of INBS as set out in the said order to Irish Life & Permanent plc (‘ILP’), a credit institution licensed in Ireland.

| | The Court did declare, inter alia, that the transfer order and each part of it is a reorganisation measure for the purposes of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001. |
| --- | --- |

The Court did declare, inter alia, that the transfer order and each part of it is a reorganisation measure for the purposes of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001.

| | Pursuant to Section 36 of the Act, an application may be made for the setting aside of the transfer order on the conditions set out therein, to the High Court of Ireland, at the Four Courts, Inns Quay, Dublin 7, Ireland not later than five working days after the making of the transfer order. Pursuant to Section 64(2) of the Act, no appeal lies from the transfer order to the Supreme Court without leave of the High Court. |
| --- | --- |

Pursuant to Section 36 of the Act, an application may be made for the setting aside of the transfer order on the conditions set out therein, to the High Court of Ireland, at the Four Courts, Inns Quay, Dublin 7, Ireland not later than five working days after the making of the transfer order. Pursuant to Section 64(2) of the Act, no appeal lies from the transfer order to the Supreme Court without leave of the High Court.

| | Full copies of the order are available from the Central Office of the High Court by e-mail to: listroomhighcourt@courts.ie |
| --- | --- |

Full copies of the order are available from the Central Office of the High Court by e-mail to: listroomhighcourt@courts.ie

---
# CE2013353EN.01024702.xml

| 3.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 353/247 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 353/247

---

Thursday 13 September 2012EU-Algeria agreement on scientific and technological cooperation ***

P7_TA(2012)0338

European Parliament legislative resolution of 13 September 2012 on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria on scientific and technological cooperation (08283/2012 – C7-0122/2012 – 2011/0175(NLE))

2013/C 353 E/45

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (08283/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (08283/2012),

| — | having regard to the draft agreement signed on 19 March 2012 (17318/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft agreement signed on 19 March 2012 (17318/2011),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 186, Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0122/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with Article 186, Article 218(6), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 218(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (C7-0122/2012),

| — | having regard to Rules 81, 90(7) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rules 81, 90(7) and 46(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A7-0267/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A7-0267/2012),

| 1. | Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the conclusion of the Agreement;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the People's Democratic Republic of Algeria.

---
#### RETAIL CLERKS LOCAL UNION NO. 381, Affiliated with the Retail Clerks International Associations, AFL-CIO, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. INDUSTRIAL CONFERENCE BOARD and Kitsap County Retail Druggists’ Association, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. INDUSTRIAL CONFERENCE BOARD and Kitsap County Retail Druggists’ Association, et al., Respondents.

Nos. 17741, 17784, 17790.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Dec. 3, 1963.

Filed May 6, 1965.

Mr. Tim L. Bornstein, Washington, D. C., for petitioner in No. 17741. Messrs. Sol Lippman, Washington, D. C., and Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., were on the brief for petitioner in No. 17741.

Mr. James V. Ramsdell, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Washington, pro haec vice, by special leave of court, Tacoma, Wash., for petitioners in No. 17784 and respondents in No. 17790. Mr. Homer S. Carpenter, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for petitioners in No. 17784 and respondents in No. 17790.

Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., with whom Messrs. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Gary Green, Atty., N. L. R. B., were on the brief, for respondent in Nos. 17741 and 17784 and petitioner in No. 17790.

Supplemental Opinion

' Before Bazelon, Chief Judge, and Fahy and McGowan, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Under date of December 19, 1963, we entered judgment 117 U.S.App.D.C. 190, 327 F.2d 888, enforcing the order of the Board in these cases except that insofar as the order was based in No. 17790 upon respondents therein “engaging in a lock-out while continuing to operate their establishments,” we reserved our decision and retained jurisdiction until further order of the court.

In light of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in N. L. R. B. v. Brown et al., 85 S.Ct. 980, the order of the Board insofar as applicable to No. 17790 is modified by deleting therefrom in paragraph 1(a) the requirement that the employers involved cease and desist from “engaging in a lock-out while continuing to operate their establishments.” As so modified the order will be enforced.

It is so ordered.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

897 

KAH 11-02615 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. 

FRANK DUDLEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

SIBATU KHAHAIFA, SUPERINTENDENT, ORLEANS 

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK K. WALSH OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court,

Orleans County (James P. Punch, A.J.), dated August 25, 2011 in a

habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision

at Supreme Court.

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### STATE v. SNEED and STATE v. WEBB

No. 254 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 258.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.
#### NORTHWESTERN BANK v. HAMRICK

No. 401P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 600.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982.