alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_178958.htm


Exhibit 10.1


March 24, 2020


 


James R. Donnelly


350 Linden Oaks


Rochester, NY 14625


 


 


Dear Jim:


 


In connection with the appointment as Chief Executive Officer and President of CurAegis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) your annual compensation will be $175,000 per annum. You will receive an increase to your base salary based on CurAegis’ achievement of net sales goals, as described in more detail in Schedule A hereto.


 


You will receive a grant of 500,000 incentive stock options upon your appointment to this position by the board of directors. The options will be granted at the closing price of the Company common stock on the date of the grant and will reflect vesting as follows: 25% upon grant date and 25% on each anniversary date of the grant with a life of 10 years.


 


Your employment is at-will and continues at the convenience of the Company and your roles and responsibilities can be changed from time to time as deemed necessary by board of directors. You will be eligible to participate in the Company’s benefit programs. If the Company terminates your employment status without cause or removes you as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President without cause, you will receive 6 months’ pay as severance.


 


This agreement supersedes the employment agreement dated January 09, 2017 between you and CurAegis. Please review and sign this offer letter as confirmation of your acceptance of the terms of your employment and return to my attention.


 


Sincerely,


/s/ Gary Siconolfi


 


Gary Siconolfi


Chairman of the Board


CurAegis Technologies, Inc.


 


 


Accepted:                                                                                


 


 


Date:                                                                                        


 





 










 








 


Schedule A
#### BAXTER v. POE

No. 22 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 404.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 25 September 1979.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 1, 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00212

- CV

John Rady, Appellant

v.

GMAC Mortgage Corporation, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONE S, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND FIELD

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

THIS CAUSE having this day come on to be considered, and the Court being of the opinion that

it is without jurisdiction of the cause and that the appeal shoul d therefore be dismissed for want

of jurisdiction: IT IS ACCORDINGLY considered, adjudged and ordered that the appeal is

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. It is FURTHER ordered that, it appearing that the appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication as to costs is made, and that this decision be

certified below for observance.
# C_2011258EN.01000101.xml

| 2.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/1

---

RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 25 August 2011

to the Council of the European Union on the external auditors of the Banco de Portugal

(ECB/2011/11)

2011/C 258/01

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 27.1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national central banks are audited by independent external auditors recommended by the ECB’s Governing Council and approved by the Council of the European Union.

| (2) | The mandate of the Banco de Portugal’s current external auditors ended after the audit for the financial year 2010. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2011. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The mandate of the Banco de Portugal’s current external auditors ended after the audit for the financial year 2010. It is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2011.

| (3) | The Banco de Portugal has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers & Associados — Sociedade de Revisores Oficiais de Contas, Lda. as its external auditors for the financial years 2011 to 2016, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Banco de Portugal has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers & Associados — Sociedade de Revisores Oficiais de Contas, Lda. as its external auditors for the financial years 2011 to 2016,

HAS ADOPTED THIS RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that PricewaterhouseCoopers & Associados — Sociedade de Revisores Oficiais de Contas, Lda. should be appointed as the external auditors of the Banco de Portugal for the financial years 2011 to 2016.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 25 August 2011.

The President of the ECB

Jean-Claude TRICHET

---
eq-ex1021_347.htm



Exhibit 10.21

Equillium, Inc.

FIRST AMENDMENT TO 

OFFER LETTER 

 

This First Amendment to Offer Letter (this “Amendment”), amending that certain Offer Letter (the “Offer Letter”), dated August 1, 2018, by and between Equillium, Inc. (the “Company”) and Krishna Polu, M.D. (the “Executive”), is entered into effective as of January 1, 2020.  Capitalized terms used herein which are not defined herein shall have the definition ascribed to them in the Offer Letter. 

RECITALS

Whereas, the Company and the Executive have previously entered into the Offer Letter; and

Whereas, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Offer Letter as set forth herein. 

AGREEMENT

Now, Therefore, in consideration of the foregoing and the promises and covenants contained herein and in the Offer Letter, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 

1.First Paragraph of the Offer Letter.  The reference to “Chief Medical Officer” contained in first paragraph of the Offer Letter is hereby amended and restated such that it shall be “Executive Vice President Research & Development and Chief Medical Officer.”

2.Fifth Paragraph of the Offer Letter.  The reference to “$375,000” contained in fifth paragraph of the Offer Letter is hereby amended and restated such that it shall be “$450,000.”

3.Sixth Paragraph of the Offer Letter.  The reference to “thirty percent (30%)” contained in sixth paragraph of the Offer Letter is hereby amended and restated such that it shall be “forty percent (40%).”

4.Ninth Paragraph of the Offer Letter.  The reference to “a Deemed Liquidation Event (as defined in the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended from time to time)” contained in ninth paragraph of the Offer Letter is hereby amended and restated such that it shall be “the effective date of a Change in Control (as defined in the Company’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan).”

5.Effect of Amendment.  Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Offer Letter shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.

1

216767100 v2 



6.Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, without regard to any conflicts of law principals thereof that would call for the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.

7.Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed via facsimile or electronic (i.e., PDF) transmission and in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one instrument.

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]

 

2

216767100 v2 



In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Offer Letter as of the date first written above.

 


	
 

COMPANY:

Equillium, Inc.

 

By:/s/ Daniel M. Bradbury

Name: Daniel M. Bradbury

Title: Chief Executive Officer
	
 

 

 




 

 

EXECUTIVE:

 

 


	
/s/ Krishna Polu, M.D.
	
 

	
Krishna Polu, M.D.
	
 




 

216767100 v2
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 18 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determ ined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 3, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 06-30418 Summary Calendar

_____________________ PAULINE RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

__________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Shreveport

USDC No. 5:04-CV-2565

__________________________________________________ Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The judgment of the court is affirmed for these reasons: 1. Dr. Dixon’s conclusions were not accepted by the administrative judge for substantial reasons. No clinical findings are shown in Dr. Dixon’s2 examination records to support his statements of radiating pain and numbness etc. The specialist did not find these symptoms. No other doctor reached the same conclusion as Dr. Dixon. 2. While Ms. Richardson may suffer from disc deterioration and some nerve root compression, the record does not show motor or sensory loss and the impairment listed in § 1.04(A). 3. We are unable to say that the evidence does not support the findings of the administrative law judge. We must therefore affirm the judgment that affirms the Commissioner’s decision. AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 234 (Wednesday, December 7, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 72780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23704]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Tehama County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet 
in Red Bluff, California. Agenda items to be covered include: (1) 
Introductions, (2) Approval of Minutes, (3) Public Comment, (4) 
Discussion of the Modoc Speaker Last Meeting, (5) Subcommittee Reports, 
(6) Chairman's Perspective, (7) General Discussion, (8) County Update, 
(9) Next Agenda.

DATES: The meeting will be held on December 8, 2005 from 9 a.m. and end 
at approximately 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Lincoln Street School, 
Conference Room A, 1135 Lincoln Street, Red Bluff, CA. Individuals 
wishing to speak or propose agenda items must send their names and 
proposals to Jim Giachino, DFO, 825 N. Humboldt Ave., Willows, CA 
95988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bobbin Gaddini, Committee Coordinator, 
USDA, Mendocino National Forest, Grindstone Ranger District, P.O. Box 
164, Elk Creek, CA 95939. (530) 968-5329; E-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2d5d5d3d6d6dbdcdbf2d4c19cd4d7d69cc7c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c3b3b3d38383532351c3a2f723a393872292f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Committee 
discussion is limited to Forest Service staff and Committee members. 
However, persons who wish to bring matters to the attention of the 
Committee may file written statements with the Committee staff before 
or after the meeting. Public input sessions will be provided and 
individuals who made written requests by December 4, 2005 will have the 
opportunity to address the committee at those sessions.

    Dated: November 28, 2005.
James F. Giachino,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 05-23704 Filed 12-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No: 3:01cr8/RV

3:05cv131/RV/MD

WALTER DEVON GRANDISON

_____________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated April 18, 2005. The defendant previously has been furnished

a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 101) is summarily DISMISSED as untimely.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of May, 2005.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:01-cr-00008-RV-EMT Document 104 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011239EN.01000601.xml

| 17.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/6

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 239/04

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 4.7.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 4.7.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | POK/56-14 |
| Species | Saithe (Pollachius virens) |
| Zone | VI; EU and international waters of Vb, XII and XIV |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 771946 |

Date and time of closure

4.7.2011

Duration

4.7.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Spain

Stock or Group of stocks

POK/56-14

Species

Saithe (Pollachius virens)

Pollachius virens

Zone

VI; EU and international waters of Vb, XII and XIV

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

771946

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations or the      Company.   |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |                         | Franchise      Holdings International, Inc.  |
|------------------------|------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      May 1, 2009 | By:                          | /s/ A.      J. Boisdrenghien                 |
|                   | A.      J. Boisdrenghien     |
|                   | Chief      Executive Officer |
|                   | Chief      FinancialOfficer  |
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PHILLIP J. KENNEDY,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv61/MCR/MD

JEAN-PERRIER SAKEY, et al.,

Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff

commenced this action on February 25, 2010 by filing a civil rights complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (doc. 1). Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or file a motion to

proceed in forma pauperis and was given twenty-eight (28) days in which to do so

(doc. 3). After receiving no response or explanation from plaintiff, the court entered

an order requiring plaintiff to show cause, within fourteen (14) days, why this cause

should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with an order of the court (doc. 4).

To date, plaintiff has failed to respond or explain his inability to do so. He has filed

nothing since filing his initial complaint.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this cause be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of May, 2010.

 

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 3:10cv61/MCR/MD

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within fourteen days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that

may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).
- Text145: 
    - Text146: 
    - Text147: 
    - Text148: 
    - Text149: 
    - Text150: 
    - Text151: 
    - Text152: 
    - Text153: 
    - Text154: 
    - Text155: 
    - Text156: 
    - Text158: 
    - Text159: 
    - Text160: 
    - Text162: 
    - Text164: 
    - Text165: 
    - Text166:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LESCARDEN
INC'S FEBRUARY 28, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                           5,756
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    140,847
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,603
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          291,668
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,840
<COMMON>                                        19,509
<OTHER-SE>                                   (163,334)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,683
<SALES>                                         16,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,502
<CGS>                                           12,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  431,433
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (414,931)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (414,931)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (414,931)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
Case 1:06-cr-00518-SHS Document 78 Filed 10/18/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PENSACOLA MOTOR SALES,

a Florida corporation, d/b/a

BOB TYLER TOYOTA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:09cv571/RS-MD

EASTERN SHORE TOYOTA, LLC,

an Alabama Limited Liability Company;

DAPHNE AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, an

Alabama Limited Liability Company;

SHAWN ESFAHANI, Individually;

and DAPHNE ENTERPRISES, INC.,

an Alabama Corporation,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Plaintiff’s motion for clarification (Doc. 149) is denied.

ORDERED on September 24, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### WOOD v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE

No. 141 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 410.

Petitions by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 January 1980. Plaintiffs’ motion to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 8 January 1980.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CARLOS ALMEIDA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv4-SPM/WCS

LAWRENCE REEL, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated April 15, 2010 (doc. 12). Plaintiff has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and

recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should

be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 12) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is transferred to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, for all further proceedings. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of May, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge