Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices 71801 

Expiration Date: April 30, 2006. 

Type of Request: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Abstract: The Child and Adult Care 

Food Program is mandated by section 17 

of the Richard B. Russell National 

School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. § 1766). 

Program implementing regulations are 

contained in 7 CFR part 226. In 

accordance with § 226.7(d), State 

agencies must submit a monthly report 

of program activity in order to receive 

Federal reimbursement for meals served 

to eligible participants. 

Respondents: State agencies that 

administer the Child and Adult Care 

Food Program. 

Number of Respondents: 53. 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: The number of responses 

includes initial, revised, and final 

reports submitted each month. The 

overall average is three submissions per 

State agency per reporting month for a 

total of 36 per year. 

Estimate of Burden: Public reporting 

burden for this collection of information 

is estimated to average three hours per 

respondent for each submission. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 5,724 hours. 

Dated: November 17, 2005. 

Roberto Salazar, 

Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service. 

[FR Doc. E5–6708 Filed 11–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–30–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

White River National Forest; Summit 

County, CO; Arapahoe Basin Ski Area 

and Montezuma Bowl Projects 

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. 

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an 

environmental impact statement. 

SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will 

prepare an Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS) to disclose the 

anticipated environmental effects of the 

Arapahoe Basin Ski Area and 

Montezuma Bowl Projects. The 

Proposed Action would upgrade and 

expand infrastructure within the 

existing Special Use Permit (SUP) area 

to accommodate parking demands and 

improve skiing opportunities for 

existing and proposed visitation, 

thereby enhancing the quality of the 

recreation experience. 

The major aspects of the Proposed 

Action include: 

• Install a new fixed-grip triple of 

quad chairlift in Montezuma Bowl. 

Adding lift-served skiing within 

Montezuma Bowl would increase ABasin’s existing overall skiable acreage 

for approximately 487 to 812 acres. The 

Montezuma Bowl area would add 

approximately 175 acres of intermediate 

terrain and 149 acres of advanced and 

expert terrain, all accessible for roundtrip skiing via one proposed chairlift. 

• Install snowfencing west of the 

proposed lift terminal, below (south) of 

the ridgeline, to aid in snow retention. 

• Install a raised ‘‘avalauncher’’

platform to allow A-Basin ski patrol to 

safely conduct snow safety operations in 

Montezuma Bowl. 

• Replace the existing Exhibition lift 

(fixed-grip triple) with a high speed 

detachable quad chair accommodating 

2,60 people per hour in a slightly 

modified alignment. 

• Create an additional 231 parking 

spaces by widening and re-grading the 

Lower Overflow Lot and the High Noon 

Lot, bringing total parking capacity at ABasin’s five lots to 1,781 vehicles. In 

conjunction with the re-grading of the 

High Noon lot, a series of sediment 

detention basins are proposed along the 

west edge of the parking area, parallel 

with Highway 6. 

DATES: Comments concerning the scope 

of the analysis should be received by 

January 6, 2006. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments 

concerning this notice should be 

addressed to Maribeth Gustafson, Forest 

Supervisor, c/o Peech Keller, Project 

Leader, Dillon Ranger District, PO Box 

620, Dillon, CO 80498; (970) 468–7735 

(fax); or by submitting an e-mail to: 

comments-rocky-mountain-white-rivereastzone@fs.fed.us. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peech Keller, Project Leader, at the 

Dillon Ranger District via telephone at 

(970) 468–5400 or e-mail at 

cpkeller2fs.fed.us. Individuals who use 

telecommunication devices for the deaf 

(TDD) may call the Federal Information 

Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 

between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern 

Standard Time, Monday through Friday. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Proposed Action addresses issues 

related to the recreation experience. 

Presently, alpine skiing/snowboarding 

and other resort activities are provided 

to the public through a SUP issued by 

the Forest Service and administered by 

the White River National Forest. All 

elements of the proposal remain within 

the existing SUP boundary area. 

The proposed improvements are 

consistent with the 2002 Revised White 

River National Forest Land and 

Resource Management Plan (Forest 

Plan). The proposed improvements are 

considered necessary in light of current 

resort deficiencies and projected future 

visitation. 

Purpose and Need for Action 

The Forest Service and A-Basin 

cooperatively identified a purpose for 

this proposal, which is to upgrade and 

expand infrastructure within the 

existing SUP area to accommodate 

parking demands and improve skiing 

opportunities for existing and proposed 

visitation, thereby enhancing the quality 

of the recreation experience. 

Responsible Official 

The responsible official is Maribeth 

Gustafson, Forest Supervisor for the 

White River National Forest, 900 Grand 

Ave., P.O. Box 948, Glenwood Springs 

Colorado 81602. The responsible official 

will document the decision and reasons 

for the decision in a Record of Decision. 

That decision will be subject to appeal 

under 36 CFR part 215 or part 251. 

Nature of Decision To Be Made 

Based on the analysis that will be 

documented in the forthcoming EIS, the 

responsible official for this project, the 

Forest Supervisor of the White River 

National Forest, will decide whether or 

not to implement, in whole or in part, 

the Proposed Action or another 

alternative developed by the Forest 

Service. 

Scoping Process 

Public questions and comments 

regarding this proposal are an integral 

part of this environmental analysis 

process. Comments will be used to 

identify issues and develop alternatives 

to A-Basin’s proposal. To assist the 

Forest Service in identifying and 

considering issues and concerns on the 

proposed action, comments should be as 

specific as possible. 

Input provided by interested and/or 

affected individuals, organizations and 

governmental agencies will be used to 

identify resource issues that will be 

analyzed in the Draft EIS. The Forest 

Service will identify significant issues 

raised during the scoping process, and 

use them to formulate alternatives, 

prescribe mitigation measures, or 

analyze environmental effects. 

Comment Requested 

This notice of intent initiates the 

scoping process which guides the 

development of the draft environmental 

impact statement, including the 

identification of the range of alternatives 

to be considered. While public 

participation is strictly optional at this 

stage, the Forest Service believes that it 

is important to give reviewers notice of 

several court rulings related to public 

71802 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 229 / Wednesday, November 30, 2005 / Notices 

participation in the subsequent 

environmental review process. First, 

reviewers of draft statement must 

structure their participation in the 

environmental review of the proposal so 

that it is meaningful and alerts an 

agency to the reviewer’s position and 

contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear 

Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,553 

(1978). Also, environmental objections 

that could be raised at the draft 

environmental impact statement stage 

but that are not raised until after 

completion of the final environmental 

impact statement may be waived or 

dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon 

v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 

1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. 

Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. 

Wis. 1980). 

Because of these court rulings, it is 

very important that those interested in 

this proposed action participate during 

the scoping period so that substantive 

comments and objections are made 

available to the Forest Service at a time 

when it can meaningfully consider them 

and respond to them in the 

development of the alternatives. To 

assist the Forest Service in identifying 

and considering issues and concerns on 

the proposed action, comments on the 

proposed action should be as specific as 

possible. 

Dated: November 18, 2005. 

Catherine Kahlow, 

Acting Forest Supervisor, White River 

National Forest. 

[FR Doc. 05–23262 Filed 11–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–11–M 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–008] 

Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel 

Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstance Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On April 4, 2005, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published a notice of 

initiation of changed circumstance 

review of the antidumping order on 

certain circular welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes from Taiwan to 

determine whether Yieh Phui 

Enterprise, Ltd. (Yieh Phui) is a 

successor–in-interest to Yieh Hsing 

Enterprise, Ltd. (Yieh Hsing). See 

Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel 

Pipes and Tubes From Taiwan: 

Initiation of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstance Review, 70 FR 17063 

(April 4, 2005) (Initiation Notice). On 

October 17, 2005, the Department 

published a notice of preliminary 

results of this changed circumstance 

review in which we preliminarily 

determined that Yieh Phui is the 

successor–in-interest to Yieh Hsing for 

purposes of determining antidumping 

liability. We gave interested parties the 

opportunity to comment after 

publication of the Preliminary Results. 

See Certain Circular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: 

Prelminary Results of Antidumping duty 

Changed Circumstance Review, 70 FR 

60279 (October 17, 2005) (Preliminary 

Results). No comments were received; 

thus, the Department is adopting its 

preliminary determination for these 

final results. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: November 30, 2005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Angela Strom or Robert James at (202) 

482–2704 or (202) 482–0649, 

respectively; AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 7, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Ave. NW., Washington 

DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 15, 2005, Yieh Phui 

requested the Department to conduct an 

expedited changed circumstance review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

certain circular welded carbon steel 

pipes and tubes from Taiwan. The 

Department determined that the 

information submitted by Yieh Phui was 

sufficient to warrant initiation of 

changed circumstance review and, on 

April 4, 2005, the Department published 

the Initiation Notice for this review. 

Yieh Phui claims to be a successor–ininterest to Yieh Hsing after it acquired 

Yieh Hsing’s pipe production facilities. 

On April 6, 2005, the Department issued 

Yieh Phui a questionnaire requesting 

further details on the acquisition of the 

pipe facilities. Yieh Phui responded on 

April 29, 2005. On May 17, 2005, the 

Department issued a second 

supplemental questionnaire, to which 

Yieh Phui responded on June 13, 2005. 

The evidence on the record shows 

that Yieh Phui operates in essentially 

the same manner in terms of 

production, management and customer 

base as did Yieh Hsing prior to the 

transfer of its pipe facilities. In 

analyzing the totality of the factors on 

the record with respect to the transfer of 

the pipe operations, the Department 

preliminarily concluded that Yieh Phui 

was the successor–in-interest to Yieh 

Hsing and ought to be accorded the 

same antidumping duty treatment as its 

predecessor. See Preliminary Results. 

Scope of the Order 

Imports covered by this order are 

shipments of certain circular welded 

carbon steel pipes and tubes. The 

Department defines such merchandise 

as welded carbon steel pipes and tubes 

of circular cross section, with walls not 

thinner than 0.065 inch and 0.375 inch 

or more but not over 4.5 inches in 

outside diameter. These products are 

commonly referred to in the industry as 

‘‘standard pipe’’ and are produced to 

various American Society for Testing 

Materials specifications, most notably 

A–53, A–120 and A–135. Standard pipe 

is currently classified under 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (HTSUS) item numbers 

7306.30.5025, 7306.30.5032, 

7306.30.5040, and 7306.30.5055. 

Although the HTSUS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

merchandise under the order is 

dispositive. 

Final Results of Changed Circumstance 

Review 

For the reasons stated in the 

Preliminary Results, we determine that 

Yieh Phui is the successor–in-interest to 

Yieh Hsing for antidumping duty 

purposes. The Department did not 

receive any comments or requests for a 

hearing from either party within the 

time frames established in the 

Preliminary Results. As a result, Yieh 

Phui will receive the same antidumping 

duty cash–deposit rate (i.e., 1.61 

percent) that was calculated and applied 

to Yieh Hsing during the most recent 

administrative review under this order. 

See Certain Circular Welded Carbon 

Steel Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 69 FR 58390 

(September 30, 2004). The Department 

will instruct the U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection to collect cash 

deposits at a rate of 1.61 percent for all 

entries made by Yieh Phui of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the date of publication of the final 

results of this changed circumstance 

review. 

Notification Regarding APOs 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APOs) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance