alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.2 BARCLAYCARD FUNDING PLCS OFFICERS CERTIFICATE GRACECHURCH RECEIVABLES TRUSTEE LIMITED
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE The undersigned officer of Barclaycard Funding PLC, a private limited liability company
incorporated under the laws of Jersey, Channel Islands (the MTN Issuer), hereby certifies on
behalf of the MTN Issuer and on his own behalf for purposes of the Investor Certificate, as
follows:  1.

I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the MTN Issuer;2.

I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the MTN Issuer; and3.

To the best of my knowledge, the MTN Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of the Investor Certificate for the period between January 1, 2004
and December 31, 2004. Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the
Registration Statement related to the above-referenced issue of Investor Certificate. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name this 30th day of June, 2005. By:
    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:
    Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:
    Director
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Labberrius Qudon Evans, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00260

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Franklin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F

9330 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Burgess and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cou rt

. We note that the appellant, Labberrius Qudon Evans, has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDER ED FEBRUARY 26, 2020 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# C_2011241EN.01001601.xml

| 19.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/16

---

Notice concerning a request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC — Extension of deadline

Request from a contracting entity

2011/C 241/10

On 24 June 2011, the Commission received a request under Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1).

1

The request, from Magyar Posta, concerns certain financial services (cf. fourth indent of Article 6(2(c)) of Directive 2004/17/EC) in Hungary. It was published on page 15 of OJ C 200 on 8 July 2011. The initial deadline was 27 June 2011.

Given that the Commission needs to obtain and analyse additional information, and in accordance with the second sentence of Article 30(6), the period granted to the Commission for deciding on this request is hereby extended by three months.

The final deadline is now 27 December 2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed  Consolidated  Balance  Sheets at June 30,  1998  (unaudited)  and the
Condensed  Statements  of  Income  for the  Three  Months  Ended  June 30,  1998
(unaudited) and 1997 (restated) and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999       MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998       APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998       JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         22,118,049        6,208,777
<SECURITIES>                                   0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  12,319,228        12,483,612
<ALLOWANCES>                                   333,450           299,210
<INVENTORY>                                    15,956,030        13,571,801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               53,483,363        32,875,743
<PP&E>                                         28,614,399        27,824,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,025,112        14,847,661
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 69,458,312        49,224,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,434,273        8,025,945
<BONDS>                                        4,843,889         5,402,447
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                 0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,410             2,410
<COMMON>                                       182,576           120,985
<OTHER-SE>                                     46,727,394        34,722,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   69,458,312        49,224,795
<SALES>                                        25,669,670        18,109,926
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               25,669,670        18,109,926
<CGS>                                          15,154,887        10,218,168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,481,811         15,276,838
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               42,305            50,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               18,150            38,569
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             113,482           91,814
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,149,917         2,761,367
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,579,500         920,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,570,417         1,840,867
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0                 0
<CHANGES>                                      0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,570,417         1,840,867
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .14               .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .13               .09
        


</TABLE>
!y F{y Y1'Y ': l ELKC;':*'.:: ~:c;,L., 1 *-& !; C'NITEU STATES DIS'I'RICT COIJRT ? i ! ! DOC 2: ;r S(lU'l'1 IERN DISTRICT Ol NEW YORK i _.__._l.r_ _ E, i \\;~gr~;~-{i,i:,-;:): --- 5:3&-cR ..," 7; I. - t 

:,__ .--" .--.- ---. .u.-,rrF---"-' .,'+--., .-. .I <.- ' 

IK RE: 

j MAS-I'EK FlLE 

FOSAhl,AX PRODTJCTS LI;\131LI'l'Y I I I'IG.4TION 

I 1 106-MD- 1789 (Jl'K) 

l'hir. Ur)c./,nrr.n~ Kt~/tr!c.s Tu All Acriotw 

OKI)EK FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC \'1C E 

Considcring thc Ccrtiticate oS Good Sta~ldi~~g and all nthcr documents required by Case 

Managenlent Order No. 3 submitted by counsel. IT IS HFREI31' 0RT)ERE':T) that: 

Applicant's Name: S. Lccnan C';irter 

Firm Name: iVnllcr. Lansden. Dortch & Davis, I .I .P 

Address: 51 1 1 Inion Streil.l. Suite 2700 

is adulirtcd to practice pro hac \.ice as cou~lsel for hlcrck & Co., lnc, in the above captionrd case 

\ in the United States District Court for the Suulhel.n Ilistrict of Ncw Ynrk. 

A 

'" Jlaled: ~a~'.. 7008 

New Yorli. Kt.\v I'rlrh 

. . . . . . .- . LfA, - . 

llnitcd Status Ilist rid Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 32 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 1 of 2
CEItTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING 

; ss, 

.\.lIUULE DISTRICT OF TENNKSSI'II 

1. KEI'I'H 'I'HIIOClihlOII'I'I~.U. Clerk ui' the L'nilcd Slates Ilistrict C:ourt for the Middle 

1)istr.icl of'l'cnncsscc. 

110 I Il-,KIX3Y C'ER'I I1 Y I hat S. KEENAN CARTER lvas duly ndmittcd li! jlrdct~cc in said 

('our1 on ,lutlc 2Sih, 2004, :ind IS in good standing as a rneu~bcr 01' ~hu b;~r 01-said Courr. 

Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 32 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011117EN.01001101.xml

| 15.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/11

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/239/CFSP apply

2011/C 117/08

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in Annex II to Council Decision 2011/239/CFSP (1).

1

Following a review of the list of persons, entities and bodies to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Common Position 2006/318/CFSP on restrictive measures against Burma/Myanmar apply, the Council of the European Union has determined that the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the above-mentioned Annex II fulfil the criteria set out in that Common Position and they should consequently remain subject to the restrictive measures as renewed by Council Decision 2011/239/CFSP. The restrictive measures are suspended until 30 April 2012 insofar as they apply to persons which appear in Annex IV to this Decision.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 13 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| TEFS Coordination |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

TEFS Coordination

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's Decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 101, 15.4.2011, p. 27.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sid Soderholm, Ph.D., NORA Coordinator, (202) 401-0721. 

# ADDRESSES:

                        Comments may also be e-mailed to                         *niocindocket@cdc.gov*, or sent via postal mail to: Docket NIOSH-047, Robert A. Taft Laboratories (C-34), 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226.                     

                        Stakeholders are also invited to submit comments electronically at the NORA Web page:                         *http://www.cdc.gov/​niosh/​nora.*                         Comments submitted to the Web page by others can also be viewed there.                     

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                     

Dated: November 30, 2005. 

Diane Allen, 

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 05-23664 Filed 12-5-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BRAD M SHIPLEY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00032-MP-WCS

SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, STATES ATTORNEYS OFFICE,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 5, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge, recommending that this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The time for filing

objections has passed, and none have been filed. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. This matter is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of February, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT   Document 10    Filed 04/05/10   Page 1 of 5

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT   Document 10    Filed 04/05/10   Page 2 of 5

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT   Document 10    Filed 04/05/10   Page 3 of 5

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT   Document 10    Filed 04/05/10   Page 4 of 5

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT   Document 10    Filed 04/05/10   Page 5 of 5
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

-----------------------------------------------------------------x

CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN,

an individual,

Plaintiff, 07 CV 03273 (RJH)

vs. RULE 7.1 STATEMENT

PAX VENTURES, LLC.

A New York Limited Liability Company,

Defendant.

-----------------------------------------------------------------x

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 [formerly Local General Rule 1.9] and to

enable District Judges and Magistrates Judges of the Court to evaluate possible disqualifications or

recusal, the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER E. BROWN (a private nongovernmental party) certifies that said Plaintiff has no corporate parents, affiliates and/or subsidiaries

which are publicly held..

Dated: December 19, 2007

KU & MUSSMAN, P.A.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

11098 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 301

Miami, FL 33161

Tel: (305) 891-1322

Fax: (305) 891-4512

louis@kumussman.com

By:/s/ J. Justin Griffin 

J. Justin Griffin, Esq.

Of Counsel Bar ID No.: JG4808

64 Oriole Street

Pearl Street, NY 10965

Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 13 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Tel: (845) 653-1172

Fax: (845) 623-8072

jjg10@hotmail.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 19 day of December, 2007, I electronically filed the th

foregoing with the Clerk of Court by using CM/ECF system which will send notice of electronic

filing to the following: Zoe L. Davidson, Esq. and Stacie Bryce Feldman, Esq. 217 Broadway, Ste

401, New York, New York 10007.

By:/s/ J. Justin Griffin 

 J. Justin Griffin, Esq.

Case 1:07-cv-03273-RJH Document 13 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### MARVIN E. MEADOWS v. PERDRIX MACHINERY & SALES COMPANY.

(Filed 28 April, 1965.)

Appeal by defendant from *Hobgood, J.,*November 30, 1964 Session of Lee.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover the sum of $3,737.00, down payment plus incidental charges on the purchase price of a dry-cleaning plant in Sanford, the sale of which, he alleges, defendant refused to consummate according to the agreement.

In its answer, defendant alleged that it was plaintiff who refused to comply with the contract, and it prayed for “a complete accounting” and a monetary judgment against plaintiff based thereon. Each party *373offered evidence tending to sustain the respective allegations. Upon sharply conflicting evidence the jury, answering stipulated issues, found that defendant was indebted to plaintiff in the amount of $3,000.00, and that plaintiff owed defendant nothing. From judgment entered on the verdict defendant appeals.

*Pittman, Staton & Betts for plaintiff appellee.*

*Clawson L. Williams, Jr., for defendant.appellant.*

Peb Curiam.

An examination of the record reveals no error which would warrant a new trial. This case involved only issues of fact. It was fairly submitted to the jury, which seems to have attempted to do equity. If, as defendant stressfully contends,, incompetent evidence was admitted over its objection, the exception taken was worthless because the same testimony had been theretofore or was thereafter given by the witness in other parts of his examination without objection. *Dunes Club v. Insurance Co.,*259 N.C. 293, 130 S.E. 2d 625.

No error.
Helpful Hints for Billing 

♦ Always use Modifiers. For example for the CPT-4 code (chest-x-ray) 71010 use

either modifier -26 or –TC to denote either the professional code or technical

code.

♦ Pharmacy Providers may use Point of Sale

♦ Use website to view status of bill or authorization for services rendered:

https://owcpmed.dol.gov/.

♦ Outpatient Hospital services can be billed on the UB 92 form with appropriate

Revenue Center Codes requiring CPT/HCPCS codes.

♦ All bills must contain the DEEOIC’s 9-digit case number of your patient or

client and your 9-digit provider number.

♦ Laboratory, x-ray, physical therapy, and clinical tests such as EKGs, etc. must

be identified with the correct CPT code.

♦ Facility charges for ambulatory surgical center/outpatient surgery billing must

be billed using the surgical CPT code. Modifier SG should be used.

♦ When billing for inpatient services, your Medicare number must be included.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1455 

KA 13-00721 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GARY CHAPPELL, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (CAITLIN M. CONNELLY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (NICHOLAS T. TEXIDO

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County

(Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered March 26, 2013. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of driving while ability

impaired, aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the

first degree and speeding. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him,

following a nonjury trial, of driving while ability impaired (Vehicle

and Traffic Law § 1192 [1]), aggravated unlicensed operation of a

motor vehicle in the first degree (§ 511 [3] [a] [i]), and speeding (§

1180 [d]). We reject defendant’s contention that the evidence is

legally insufficient to support the conviction. The arresting officer

testified that, after he stopped defendant’s vehicle for speeding,

defendant had glassy eyes and slurred speech, and he smelled of

alcohol. In addition, defendant failed three of four field sobriety

tests and refused to submit to a chemical test. That evidence, viewed

in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60

NY2d 620, 621), is legally sufficient to establish that defendant

operated a motor vehicle while his ability to do so was impaired by

alcohol (see People v McDonald, 27 AD3d 949, 950). The evidence is

also legally sufficient to support the conviction of aggravated

unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (see

People v Jarocha, 66 AD3d 1384, 1384, lv denied 13 NY3d 908). With

respect to the speeding conviction, we conclude that, “even if the

radar evidence standing alone were deemed insufficient to support the

conviction, there is additional evidence here that sufficiently

corroborates the accuracy of the radar reading so as to establish

defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt” (People v Knight, 72 NY2d

481, 488). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the
-2- 1455 

KA 13-00721 

offenses in this bench trial (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342,

349), we further conclude that the verdict is not against the weight

of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). 

Finally, we agree with the People that defendant’s attorney was not

ineffective in failing to make a suppression motion “that ha[d] little

or no chance of success” (People v Stultz, 2 NY3d 277, 287, rearg

denied 3 NY3d 702). 

Entered: January 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### IN RE WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY

No. 213 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 516.

Petition by Forsyth County for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 2 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 3 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 4 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 5 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 6 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 7 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 8 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 9 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 10 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 11 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 12 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 13 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 14 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 15 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 16 of 17
Case 1:07-cv-03439-WHP Document 11 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 17 of 17