alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 8, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6710-6711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-2363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose

[[Page 6711]]

confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable 
material, and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a 
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group, Subcommittee I--Career Development NCI--I Initial Review of 
Training Grants.
    Date: March 10-11, 2005.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Holiday Inn Select, 480 King Street, Alexandria, VA 
22314.
    Contact Person: Robert Bird, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Resources and Training Review Branch, National Cancer 
Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Blvd., MSC 
8328, Room 8113, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, 301-496-7978, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7012190214301d11191c5e1e19185e171f06"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="44262d36200429252d286a2a2d2c6a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 2, 2005.
LaVerne Y. Stringfield,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-2363 Filed 2-7-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 12.1
 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 9) PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 9) PLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement that is included in these
reports.
 By:
    /s/ Timothy George JungName:
    Timothy George JungTitle:
    DirectorDate:
    July 14, 2008 -26-
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-40077 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. GUADALUPE CRUZ-GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:10-CR-994-1
Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appoint e d to represent Guadalupe Cruz-Garcia has moved for lea v e t o w i t hdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Cruz-Garcia has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Cruz-Garcia’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the a p p e a l p r e sents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRAN T E D , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See5 T H C I R
. R. 42.2. Cruz-Garcia’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 19 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-40077 Document: 00511891147 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/19/2012
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2099 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2099

 To redesignate the Sullys Hill National Game Preserve in the State of 
      North Dakota as the White Horse Hill National Game Preserve.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2019

Mr. Cramer (for himself and Mr. Hoeven) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To redesignate the Sullys Hill National Game Preserve in the State of 
      North Dakota as the White Horse Hill National Game Preserve.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``White Horse Hill National Game 
Preserve Designation Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WHITE HORSE HILL NATIONAL GAME PRESERVE, NORTH 
              DAKOTA.

    (a) Redesignation.--The first section of the Act of March 3, 1931 
(46 Stat. 1509, chapter 439; 16 U.S.C. 674a), is amended by striking 
``Sullys Hill National Game Preserve'' and inserting ``White Horse Hill 
National Game Preserve''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 2 of the Act of March 3, 1931 
(46 Stat. 1509, chapter 439; 16 U.S.C. 674b), is amended by striking 
``Sullys Hill National Game Preserve'' and inserting ``White Horse Hill 
National Game Preserve''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Sullys Hill National 
Game Preserve shall be considered to be a reference to the ``White 
Horse Hill National Game Preserve''.
                                 <all>
```
- Text3: 
    - Text4: 
    - Text5: 
    - Text6: 
    - Text7: 
    - Text8: 
    - Text9:
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. § 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       In connection with the annual reporton Form 10-KSB as amended by Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No.3 on Form 10-KSB/A of SulphCo, Inc. (as amended, the "Report")of SulphCo, Inc.(the "Company") for the annual period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Rudolf W.Gunnerman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Interim Controller andPrincipal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 
       (1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 
       (2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 
/s/ Rudolf W. GunnermanRudolf W. GunnermanChief ExecutiveOfficer
November 12, 2004
/s/ Michael A. AbendMichael A. AbendInterim Controller andPrincipal Financialand Accounting Officer
November 12, 2004
       This certification accompanies thisReport pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filedby the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.
#### STATE v. CHAPMAN

No. 141 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 629.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 July 1979.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 11138 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. JOSE VILLANUEVA

- CARDENAS , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:17

- CR

- 386

- 1

Before SMITH, WIENER, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Jose Villanueva

- Cardenas appeals his eight

- month prison sentence following the revocation of the supervised release term imposed as part of his 2015 sentence for illegal reentry. Villanueva

- Cardenas argues that the district court proceedings violated Federal Rule o f Criminal Proc edure 32.1(a)(1) because he was held in custody for violating his supervised release yet was not promptly taken before a magistrate judge. As the parties agree, because

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 20, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-11138 Document: 00514565073 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/20/2018No. 17

- 11138

2 Villanueva

- Cardenas failed to raise this issue in the district court, it is subject to plain error review. S ee United States v. Peltier , 505 F.3d 389, 391 (5th Cir. 2007). Villanueva

- Cardenas has fa iled to show that it is clear or obvious that he was in custody for violating his su pervised release during the 40 days in question. See P uckett v. United States , 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009)

. In any event, Villanueva

- Cardenas has likewise failed to show that any alleged error , even if plain, affected his substantial rights

. See id. The record shows that the district court reduced his consecutive prison sentence for his new illegal reentry offense to reflect credit for the 40 days at issue

. T he judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 17-11138 Document: 00514565073 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/20/2018
#### STATE v. SUMLER

No. 18 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 751.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 24 January 1978.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 196 (Thursday, October 11, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57918-57919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Sunshine Act Meeting: Missile Defense Advisory Committee (MDAC)

AGENCY: Department of Defense; Missile Defense Agency (MDA).

ACTION: Cancellation of Meeting Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Previously, the Department of Defense announced a closed 
meeting of the Missile Defense Advisory Committee for October 11-12, 
2007 on August 24, 2007 (72 FR 48619).
    Due to the last minute unavailability of a quorum of the committee, 
the Department of Defense hereby announces the cancellation of the 
previously scheduled meeting. At this date, neither the Department of 
Defense nor the committee's Designated Federal Officer has plans to 
reschedule the meeting.
    Since the scheduling changes were subsequent to the committee 
publishing its meeting notice in the Federal Register and fall within 
the 15-day notification period required by 41 CFR 102-3.150(a), the 
Committee Management Officer for the Department of Defense, pursuant to 
41 CFR 102-3.150(b), waives the 15-calendar day notification 
requirement for the cancellation notice.
    Pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.105(j) and 102-3.140, the public or 
interested organizations may be submit written statements to the 
Missile Defense Advisory Committee about the committee's mission and 
functions. Written statements may be submitted at any time or in 
response to the stated agenda of planned meeting of the Missile Defense 
Advisory committee.
    All written statements shall be submitted to the Designated Federal 
Officer for the Missile Defense Advisory Committee, and this individual 
will ensure that the written statements are provided to the membership 
for their consideration. Contact information for the Designated Federal 
Officer can be obtained from the GSA's FACA Database--https://www.fido.gov/facadatabase/pubilc.asp.
    The Designated Federal Officer, pursuant to 41 CFR 102-3.150, will 
announce planned meetings of the

[[Page 57919]]

Missile Defense Advisory Committee. The Designated Federal Officer, at 
that time, may provide additional guidance on the submission of written 
statements that are in response to the stated agenda for the planned 
meeting in question.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: COL Mark Zamberlan, Designated Federal 
Official (DFO) at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#69040d080a2904080d47040005"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aec3cacfcdeec3cfca80c3c7c2">[email protected]</span></a>, phone/voice mail (703) 695-6438, or 
mail at 7100 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7100.

    Dated: October 5, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison, Office, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-5039 Filed 10-9-07; 10:17 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### WILES v. CONSTRUCTION CO.

No. 70 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 157.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 December 1977.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 192 (Thursday, October 4, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 56776]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4925]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; Pediatric Nutrition.
    Date: October 22, 2007.
    Time: 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6116 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Virginia P. Wray, PhD, Deputy Chief, Research 
Programs Review Branch, Research Programs Review Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive 
Blvd., Room 8125, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, 301-496-9236, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8cfbfeedf5facce1ede5e0a2e2e5e4a2ebe3fa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1c6c3d0c8c7f1dcd0d8dd9fdfd8d99fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 27, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-4925 Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2520

ADEBAYO COLE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Tax Court.

(29496-11)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 28, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adebayo Cole, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis Clarence Pett, Francesca 

Ugolini, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Adebayo Cole appeals from the tax court’s order

dismissing his tax court petition for failure to prosecute and 

upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determinations 

with respect to Cole’s income tax liabilities for the 2008 and 

2009 tax years. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the tax court. Cole v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 

29496-11 (U.S.T.C. June 24, 2013). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-19      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 1 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-19      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 2 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-19      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 3 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-19      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 4 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-19      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 5 of 6

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-19      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 6 of 6
# C_2011035EN.01002401.xml

| 4.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/24

---

Notice concerning a request in accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC — Deadline extension

Request made on behalf of a Member State

2011/C 35/09

On 22 November 2010, the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1).

1

This request, which comes from the Czech Republic, concerns exploration for and extraction of coal in that country. The request was published in OJ C 324, 1.12.2010, p. 27. The initial period expires on 23 February 2011.

As the Commission needs to obtain and examine additional information, and in accordance with the second sentence of Article 30(6), the period within which the Commission must reach a decision concerning this request has been extended by three months.

The final period therefore expires on 23 May 2011.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# EUR-Lex - - EN

*|*

#

**Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries **

*
Official Journal C 168 , 08/06/2011 P. 0013 - 0013 *

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 168/04

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy [1], a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

Date and time of closure | 21.4.2011 at 24.00 |

Duration | 21.4.2011- 31.12.2011 |

Member State | Germany |

Stock or Group of stocks | BSF/56712- |

Species | Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) |

Zone | EU and international waters of V, VI, VII and XII |

Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |

Reference number | — |

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

[1] OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

--------------------------------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 28, 2009 

s0921 

Order 

 

September 28, 2009 

138385 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138385 

 COA: 288137 

Muskegon CC: 06-053921-FH 

JIVONNIE RAMONE JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 15, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### LATNEY v. REVIER

No. 46 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 234.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 April 1977.
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE     Document 22-16      Filed 04/28/2008     Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of Berry Plastics Holding Corporation
      (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      James M. Kratochvil, the Executive Vice-President, Chief Financial Officer,
      Treasurer and Secretary of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.







/s/
      James M. Kratochvil


James
      M.
      Kratochvil


Executive
      Vice-President, Chief Financial


Officer,
      Treasurer and Secretary





Date:  August
      14, 2007