alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KELVIN FRAZIER,

Petitioner,

v. 3:10cv48-WS

WALTER A. McNEIL, 

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation docketed

February 24, 2010. See Doc. 18. The magistrate judge recommends that the

petitioner's notice of voluntary dismissal, which has been docketed as a motion, be

granted. The petitioner has filed no objections to the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation.

Upon review of the record, the court has determined that the magistrate judge's

report and recommendation must be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 18) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The petitioner's notice of voluntary dismissal, construed as a motion, (doc. 16)

is GRANTED, and the petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:10cv48-WS

3. The clerk shall close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of March , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; NIDA-K CONFLICTS SEP.                    

*Date:*                         November 15, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 9 a.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Doubletree Hotel Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Kristen V. Huntley, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Extramural Affairs, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS, Room 220, MSC 8401, 6101 Executive Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-8401, (301) 435-1433,                         *huntleyk@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 60868)    
Dated: October 24, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5308  Filed 10-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
PROB 22 DOCKET NUMBER (Tran. Court)

(Rev. 2/88)
TRANSFER OF JURISDICTION 1:03-CR-00374-002, WBH
DOCKET NUMBER (Rec. Court)

fF \Ocr 12 mmP

NAME AND ADDRESS OF DISTRICT DIVISION
PROBATIONER/SUPERVISED RELEASEE
Northern District of Georgia [| Marietta
Eric Kimble
NAME OF SENTENCING JUDGE
Honorable Willis B. Hunt, Jr.
DATES OF PROBATION/ FROM TO
SUPERVISED RELEASE: 07/10/2009 07/09/2012
a oe =
OFFENSE

Conspiracy to Possess with Intent to Distribute Heroin
21 USC 846 and 841(b)(a)(c)

PART 1 - ORDER TRANSFERRING JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3605 the jurisdiction of the probationer or supervised
releasce named above be transferred with the records of the Court to the United States District Court for the FLORIDA
District of FLORIDA upon that Court's order of acceptance of jurisdiction. This Court hereby expressly consents that the
period of probation or supervised release may be changed by the District Court to which this transfer is made without
further inquiry of this court.*

3/aftc We bab

Honorable MIDDLE
Date United States District Judge

*This sentence may be deleted at the discretion of the transferring Court.

PART 2 - ORDER ACCEPTING JURISDICTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE FLORIDA DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that jurisdiction over the above-named probationer/supervised releasee be accepted
and assumed by this Court from and after the entry of this order.

L147
Honorable

Effective Date United States District Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [Docket No. CO-200-0777-XZ-241A]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Front Range Resource Advisory Council (RAC), will meet as indicated below.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held November 14, 2007 from 9:15 a.m. to 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

Holy Cross Abbey Community Center, 2951 E. Highway 50, Canon City, Colorado 81212.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ken Smith, (719) 269-8500.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The 15 member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in the the Royal Gorge Field Office and San Luis Valley, Colorado. Planned agenda topics include: Manager updates on current land management issues including: Presentations and discussions on the Colorado BLM Noxious Weed Program, Greater Arkansas Cooperative Weed Management Program and the South Park Land Tenure Adjustment Plan Amendment. All meetings are open to the public. The public is encouraged to make oral comments to the Council at 9:30 a.m. or written statements may be submitted for the Council's consideration. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Summary minutes for the Council Meeting will be maintained in the Royal Gorge Field Office and will be available for public inspection and reproduction during regular business hours within thirty (30) days following the meeting. Meeting Minutes and agenda (10 days prior to each meeting) are also available at:                     *http://www.blm.gov/​rac/​co/​frrac/​co_​fr.htm*.                

Dated: October 10, 2007.

Roy L. Masinton,

Royal Gorge Field Manager.

[FR Doc. 07-5121  Filed 10-16-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-JB-M
#### WILLIAMS v. INSURANCE REPAIR SPECIALISTS

No. 73 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 235.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 June 1977.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
  
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         7,811,522
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,697,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                   464,171
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,774,237
<PP&E>                                         1,567,520
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,347,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 24,223,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,412,125
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       30,309
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,266,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   24,223,176
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,357,997
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,403,287
<INCOME-TAX>                                   603,413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            799,874
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   799,874
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.22
        

</TABLE>
# C_2011151EN.01002201.xml

| 21.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/22

---

Communication from the Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation of the Kingdom of the Netherlands pursuant to Article 3(2) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

2011/C 151/05

The Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation hereby gives notice that an application has been received for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block E1 as indicated on the map appended as Annex 3 to the Mining Regulation (Mijnbouwregeling) (Government Gazette (Staatscourant) 2002, No 245).

Mijnbouwregeling

Staatscourant

With reference to the Directive mentioned in the introduction and Article 15 of the Mining Act (Mijnbouwwet) (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees (Staatsblad) 2002, No 542), the Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation hereby invites interested parties to submit a competing application for authorisation to prospect for hydrocarbons in block E1 of the Dutch continental shelf.

Mijnbouwwet

Staatsblad

The Minister for Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation is the competent authority for the granting of authorisations. The criteria, conditions and requirements referred to in Articles 5(1), 5(2) and 6(2) of the abovementioned Directive are set out in the Mining Act (Bulletin of Acts and Decrees 2002, No 542).

Applications may be submitted during the 13 weeks following the publication of this notice in the Official Journal of the European Union and should be sent to:

Official Journal of the European Union

| De minister van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie |
| --- |
| ter attentie van de heer P. Jongerius, directie Energiemarkt |
| ALP A/562 |
| Bezuidenhoutseweg 30 |
| Postbus 20101 |
| 2500 EC Den Haag |
| NEDERLAND |

De minister van Economische Zaken, Landbouw en Innovatie

ter attentie van de heer P. Jongerius, directie Energiemarkt

ALP A/562

Bezuidenhoutseweg 30

Postbus 20101

2500 EC Den Haag

NEDERLAND

Applications received after the expiry of this period will not be considered.

A decision on the applications will be taken not later than 12 months after this period has expired.

Further information can be obtained by calling Mr E. J. Hoppel on the following telephone number: +31 703797088.

---
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T H O N G H W A G I L , a .k .a . H o n g H u aJ i, a. k. a. H ee Jung L ee , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71901 A ge nc yN o. A 079- 800- 947 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M a r c h 9, 2011 ** B efo re: F A R R IS , O ’ S C A N N L A IN , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H w aG i l , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of C hi na , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f orr e vi e w of

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h e rm o tio n to r e o p e n . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the 

# FI LED MA R 29 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71901 2 d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , N

aj m ab ad iv. H

older , 59 7 F . 3d 98 3, 98 6 (9th C i r. 2 0 1 0 ) , a n dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng G i l ’ s m ot i on t o reopen as un t i m el y bec ause the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov er90 days af t erthe B IA ’ s f

i nal a d m in is tr a tiv e d e c is io n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) , a n db e c au s e G il f a ile dto dem on strat e c hang ed coun trycond i t i on s m at er i alt o h ercl ai m i n o rdert o q ual i fy f o rth e r e g u la to rye x c e p tio n to th e tim e lim it f o rf ilin g m o tio n s to r e o p e n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; A lm araz v. H older , 60 8 F . 3d 63 8, 64 0-41 (9th C i r. 2010) ( de ny i ng pe t i t i on f orr e vi e w w he r e e vi de nc e of c ha nge d c ountryc ondi t i ons w as no tm at er i alt o p et i t i on er ). T o the e xt e ntG i l c ont e nds the B I A f a i l e d t o c ons i de ra l l of

the e vi de nc e s he subm i tt ed w i th the m ot i on t o reopen, she has no tov er com e the pres um pt i on that th e B I A d idr e v ie w th e r e c o r d . See Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 4 3 9 F .3 d5 9 2 , 6 0 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . G il s ub m itte da d d itio n a l e v id e n c e w ith h e ro p e n in g b r ie f to th is C o u rt, w h ic h c a n n o t b e c o n s id e r e do n r e v ie w . See 8 U . S . C . § 1252( b) ( 4) ( A ) ( the c ourtof appe a l s s ha l l de c i de the pe t i t i on onl yon the a dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e c or d on w hi c h the order of re m ov ali s bas ed). PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WILLIE MAE STUART,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-CV-96-SPM/GRJ

CARBONELLY, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes before the Court upon a letter that Plaintiff sent to the

Court (doc. 68), which has been construed as a motion for reconsideration of the

decision denying the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and to appoint

counsel. Additionally, Plaintiff has requested clarification on the status of her case.

On November 3, 2011, the magistrate judge issued a Report and

Recommendation (doc. 47) regarding Defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of

jurisdiction (doc. 45). Because the Plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative

remedies, this Court does not have jurisdiction over this matter, and therefore the

magistrate judge recommended granting the motion to dismiss. This Court agreed

and on January 12, 2012, adopted the Report and Recommendation and granted

the motion to dismiss (doc. 49). Plaintiff subsequently filed a notice of appeal to

have her case heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. 

The notice of appeal included a request for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and

a motion to appoint counsel (docs. 56 and 61). As previously stated, because

Case 4:10-cv-00096-SPM-GRJ Document 71 Filed 04/04/12 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff failed to exhaust her administrative remedies prior to filing an action in the

district court, this Court does not have jurisdiction and cannot hear this case. This

is not optional. Therefore, in accordance with Title 28, Untied States Code, Section

1915(a)(3), the Court certified that Plaintiff’s appeal is not taken in good faith and

denied the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis and the motion to appoint

counsel. The Court finds no reason to change its previous ruling. Accordingly, it

is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s letter to the Court which has

been construed as a motion for reconsideration (doc. 68) is denied. All future

filings regarding Plaintiff’s appeal should be filed with the United States District

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of April, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

-2-

Case 4:10-cv-00096-SPM-GRJ Document 71 Filed 04/04/12 Page 2 of 2
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

In the Interest of G.F., a child.

T.F.,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and

GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellees.

No. 2D23-477

September 1, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Daryl M. 

Manning, Judge.

Constance Daniels, Brandon, for Appellant.

Mary Soorus of Children's Legal Services, Tampa, for Appellee 

Department of Children and Families.

Therese Ann Savona of Defending Best Interests, Rossman Barrett Hurt 

Donahue & McLain, Orlando; and Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide 

Director of Appeals, and Stephanie E. Novenario, Senior Attorney, 

Statewide Guardian Ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Appellee Guardian 

ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
2

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur. 

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Redacted Pursuant to Protective Order
at Request of Defendants

To: “Anthony Zameczkowski" <anthonyz @google.com>

From: “Redic Thomas" <redic @google.com>

om $Figueira Decl. Tab
Received Date: 2007-11-27 02:39:26 CST 130
‘Subject: Re: Sport rights report

Tony,

Ara you in California this week?

We aie working on estimating the potential value of various sports content
to YouTube. This requires us to estimate the number of video views that we
coud potentially experience if the content of certain content providers was.
on the site. For example, if we had UEFA in 2008, what would be the:
potential number of views that we could see.: Your input in helping us come:
up with an estimate would be greatly appreciated. I've attached apage

in
also send you a copy of a email thread where

me know what you think.

we are discussing the assumptions.
Best,

Redic

On Nov 22, 2007 7:16 AM, Anthony Zameczkowski <anthonyz @ google.com> wrote:

> Here it ist

> Sorry for the delay.

> Cheers,

> Tony

>

>

oo

> Amthony Zameczkowski

> Strategic Partner Development Manager, YouTube EMEA
>

> Google

> Belgrave House

> 76 Buckingham Palace Read
> SW1 WSTQ London

> Fax +44 (0) 207 031 3001
> anthonyz @ google.com

>
> This transmission may be privileged and may contain confidential

> information intended only for the person(s) named above. Any other

> distribution, re-transmission, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited.

> If youhave received this transmission in error, please notify me

> immediately by telephone or retum E-Mail, and delete this file/message from
> your system. Nothing in this E-Mail constitutes a contractual offer capable

> of acceptance and any commercial terms it contains or references are

> expressly subject to contract

Attachments:

Highly Confidential @00001- 00716143


sports vid view assumptions.doc

Highly Confidential

130-0002

600002-00716144


Est

130-0003

timate Method

x

Highly Confidential

G00001-00716145
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Boardof Directors 

Intersil Corporation: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-4 (Nos. 333-35052 and 333-46984) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-117890, 333-88208, 333-31094, 333-50718, 333-161906,333-163448, 333-50722, 333-65804, and 333-151374) of Intersil Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 2, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Intersil Corporation and subsidiaries as of January 1, 2010,and January 2, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity comprehensive income (loss) and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended January 1, 2010, and the relatedfinancial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of January 1, 2010, which reports appear in the January 1, 2010, annual report on Form 10-K of Intersil Corporation and subsidiaries.

Our report with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Intersil Corporation and subsidiaries refers to IntersilCorporation and subsidiaries’ adoption of FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments,” (included in FASB ASC Topic 320, *Investments-Debt and EquitySecurities*), as of April 4, 2009. 

KPMG LLP 

March 2, 2010 

Orlando, Florida 

Certified Public Accountants