alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David A. Van Vliet, Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                                       
|------------------ |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 9, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ David A. Van Vliet                                                                                
|                   |  |  |  | David A. Van Vliet
Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 24, 2007 / Presidential Documents 60529 

Proclamation 8193 of October 19, 2007 

National Forest Products Week, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

During National Forest Products Week, we celebrate the rich blessings of 

our Nation’s forests, and we recognize the important resources they provide 

to our communities and our economy. 

Our Nation’s forests supply vital products and create important employment 

opportunities. Trees provide wood to make homes, furniture, musical instruments, paper for books and newspapers, and packaging materials. These 

and other products are created by the construction and manufacturing industries and provide economic security for many of our citizens. 

All Americans have an obligation to protect the Earth and a responsibility 

to be good stewards of our land, and my Administration has made forest 

health a high priority. Under the Healthy Forest Initiative, we are helping 

to protect the American people, their communities, and the environment 

from potentially devastating wildfires. Together we can conserve our woodlands and help leave a lasting legacy for future generations. 

Recognizing the importance of our forests in ensuring our Nation’s wellbeing, the Congress, by Public Law 86–753 (36 U.S.C. 123), as amended, 

has designated the week beginning on the third Sunday in October of each 

year as ‘‘National Forest Products Week’’ and has authorized and requested 

the President to issue a proclamation in observance of this week. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 21 through October 27, 2007, as 

National Forest Products Week. I call upon all Americans to observe this 

week with appropriate ceremonies and activities. 


yshivers on PROD1PC62 with MISCELLANEOUS
60530 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 24, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this nineteenth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–5298 

Filed 10–23–07; 8:50 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


yshivers on PROD1PC62 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
#### LILLIAN RUTH McCLAIN v. ALEXANDER HALEY.

(Filed 22 November, 1961.)

Appeal by plaintiff from *Fountain, Special Judge,*February Special Civil Term 1961 of CabaRrus.

This is a civil action instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant, in Iredell County, North Carolina, to recover for personal injuries' and property damages allegedly sustained in a collision between an automobile owned and operated by the plaintiff and an automobile owned and operated by the defendant, in the City of Kannapolis, North Carolina, on 19 December 1958. Summons was issued and served on the defendant on 18 October 1959. Thereafter, counsel for defendant and his insurance carrier moved for a change of venue. Plaintiff’s counsel consented to the change and on 19 December 1959 an order was entered transferring the case to Cabarrus County.

On 27 January 1961 a judgment by default and inquiry was entered by the Clerk of the Superior Court of Cabarrus County and the case was transferred to the Civil Issue Docket and calendared for trial the week of 8 February 1961.

The attorney for defendant, upon receiving a copy of the calendar of the Superior Court of Cabarrus County for the week of 8 February 1961, prepared an answer which was duly verified and filed on 4 February 1961. Defendant’s counsel was notified from the office of plaintiff’s attorney on 6 February 1961 that a default judgment had been taken on 27 January 1961.

Motion was made to set aside said judgment on the ground of inadvertence, oversight, and excusable neglect on the part of the defendant’s counsel. The court heard the motion and found facts to the effect that neither the defendant nor his insurance carrier had been guilty of negligence; that the negligence of the defendant’s attorney *729was excusable; and that the defendant has a meritorius defense to the action. The court set aside the default judgment.

Plaintiff appeals, assigning error.

*Ann Llewellyn McKenzie for plaintiff.*

*John H. Small for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

The negligence of an attorney, although inexcusable, if not imputable to the litigant may still be cause for relief. *Rierson v. York,*227 N.C. 575, 42 S.E. 2d 902.

In the hearing below, the court found that neither the defendant nor his insurance carrier had been guilty of negligence; that the negligence of defendant’s counsel was excusable; and that the defendant has a meritorious defense to the action.

The judgment of the court below is

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Asia4sale.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Montandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

January 25, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LESCARDEN
INC'S FEBRUARY 29, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                           6,790
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    135,745
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               375,188
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 375,188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          466,695
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,840
<COMMON>                                        21,874
<OTHER-SE>                                   (115,222)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   375,188
<SALES>                                        347,707
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               347,707
<CGS>                                          152,815
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  570,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (222,764)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (222,764)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (222,764)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
# C_2011170EN.01000801.xml

| 10.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/8

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

New invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 170/05

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Crotone–Rome Fiumicino and vice versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | One year from 7 December 2011 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 15 September 2011 |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation is made available free of charge | ENAC (Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile) |
| Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo |
| Viale del Castro Pretorio 118 |
| 00185 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |
| http://www.enac.gov.it |
| E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Routes concerned

Crotone–Rome Fiumicino and vice versa

Period of validity of the contract

One year from 7 December 2011

Deadline for submission of tenders

15 September 2011

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation is made available free of charge

ENAC (Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile)

Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo

Viale del Castro Pretorio 118

00185 Roma RM

ITALIA

http://www.enac.gov.it

E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it

---
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

          CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of North
American Galvanizing & Coatings, Inc. (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report
of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of
operations of the Company.


                               NORTH AMERICAN GALVANIZING & COATINGS, INC.
                                  (Registrant)



                                       /s/ Ronald J. Evans
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       President and
                                       Chief Executive Officer




                                       /s/ Beth B. Hood
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)

Date:  October 28, 2005
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-81,202-02

EX P ARTE JOEL RAMIREZ, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR20713-B IN THE 35 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM BROWN COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of tampering with
or fab ri cating phy sical evidenc e and sentenc ed to forty-five year s’ imprisonment. The Eleventh Court of Appea ls aff

irmed his conviction. Ramirez v. State , No. 11-11-00077- CR (Tex. App.—Fe b. 7, 2013)(not designated f or publication). Applicant contends that his a p p e ll a te c o u n s e l re n d e r e d ineffe ctive assistance beca use counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been aff irmed. We rema

nded thi s2

application to the trial c ourt for f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law
. Appellate counsel filed an aff idavit with the trial court. Ba sed on that aff idavit, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fa ct an d co n clus ions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been aff irmed. The trial court rec ommends that relief be g rante d. Ex parte W

ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the Eleventh Court of Appea ls in Cause No. 11-11- 00077-CR that aff

irmed his conviction in Cause No. CR20713 from the 35 District Court of Br own t h County
. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionar y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: J uly

29, 2015 Do not publish
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-8082

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus OTONIEL ALVAREZ MERCADO, a/k/a Otoniel Alvarez, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-97-297-V) Submitted: June 11, 2002 Decided: June 21, 2002 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion. Otoniel Alvarez Mercado, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr., United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: In February 1999, while already serving a related state sentence, Otoniel Alvarez Mercado was sentenced in federal court to eighty-four months imprisonment after he pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine and marijuana. On September 21, 2001, Mercado filed a “Nunc Pro Tunc” motion seeking jail credit on his federal sentence for the time spent in state custody on the related conviction. The district court denied the motion on the merits, and Mercado appealed. We view Mercado’s motion as a request for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) filed in the wrong district court (Mercado is incarcerated in Jesup, Georgia) and without exhausting the Bureau of Prisons’ administrative remedies. We therefore affirm the district court’s dismissal of Mercado’s motion, but we modify the district court’s order to reflect a dismissal without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, rather than a dismissal based on the merits. We expressly decline to address the merit or lack thereof of Mercado’s motion, so that Mercado remains free to file a § 2241 petition in the proper court after exhausting his administrative remedies. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:10cr22-SPM

PALLIS WEAVER, 

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Counts One, Four and Five of this

indictment. The district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing

Defendant's proposed change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a

report and recommendation as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties

consented to this procedure, and the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it

is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.
Page 2 of 3

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.

Case No. 4:10cr22-SPM/WCS
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on July 20, 2010. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.

Case No. 4:10cr22-SPM/WCS