IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RYAN COVERT, DARLENE J. COVERT, 

AND ERIK HULICK,

Petitioners

v.

2021 PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATIVE 

REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 4 WM 2022

Appeal from the Legislative 

Reapportionment Commission Plan

dated February 4, 2022

KERRY BENNINGHOFF, INDIVIDUALLY, 

AND AS MAJORITY LEADER OF THE 

PENNSYLVANIA HOUSE OF 

REPRESENTATIVES,

Petitioner

v.

2021 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT 

COMMISSION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 11 MM 2022

Appeal from the Legislative 

Reapportionment Commission Plan 

dated February 4, 2022

LISA M. BOSCOLA, SENATOR 18TH 

DISTRICT,

Petitioner

v.

2021 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT 

COMMISSION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 14 MM 2022

Appeal from the Legislative 

Reapportionment Commission Plan 

dated February 4, 2022
ERIC ROE,

Petitioner

v.

2021 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT 

COMMISSION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 16 MM 2022

Appeal from the Legislative 

Reapportionment Commission Plan 

dated February 4, 2022

RON Y. DONAGI, PHILIP T. GRESSMAN, 

PAMELA GORKIN, DAVID P. MARSH, 

JAMES L. ROSENBERGER, EUGENE 

BOMAN, GARY GORDON, LIZ MCMAHON, 

TIMOTHY FEEMAN, AND GARTH ISAAK,

Petitioners

v.

2021 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT 

COMMISSION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 17 MM 2022

Appeal from the Legislative 

Reapportionment Commission Plan 

dated February 4, 2022

GABRIEL INGRAM, RUTH MOTON, MARK 

KIRCHGASSER AND SUSAN POWELL,

Petitioners

v.

2021 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT 

COMMISSION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 18 MM 2022

Appeal from the Legislative 

Reapportionment Commission Plan 

dated February 4, 2022
TODD ELLIOTT KOGER,

Petitioner

v.

2021 PENNSYLVANIA LEGISLATIVE 

REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 7 WM 2022

Appeal from the Legislative 

Reapportionment Commission Plan 

dated February 4, 2022

JACKIE HUTZ,

Petitioner

v.

2021 PA LEGISLATIVE 

REAPPORTIONMENT COMMISSION,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 11 WM 2022

Appeal from the Legislative 

Reapportionment Commission Plan 

dated February 4, 2022

EDWARD J. KRESS,

Petitioner

v.

2021 LEGISLATIVE REAPPORTIONMENT 

COMMISSION OF THE COMMONWEALTH 

OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 12 WM 2022

Appeal from the Legislative 

Reapportionment Commission Plan 

dated February 4, 2022
ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the abovecaptioned legislative reapportionment appeals filed pursuant to PA. CONST. art. II, § 17(d) 

(indicating that “[a]ny aggrieved person may file an appeal from the final plan [of the 2021 

Pennsylvania Legislative Reapportionment Commission] directly to the Supreme Court”), 

this Court finds that the Final Reapportionment Plan of the Pennsylvania Legislative 

Reapportionment Commission filed on February 4, 2022, is in compliance with the 

mandates of the Pennsylvania Constitution and the United States Constitution and is not 

contrary to law, and, therefore, shall have the force of law. See PA. CONST. art. II, § 17(d) 

& (e) (specifying that “[i]f the appellant establishes that the final plan is contrary to law, 

the Supreme Court shall issue an order remanding the plan to the commission” and that 

“[w]hen the Supreme Court has finally decided an appeal...the reapportionment plan shall 

have the force of law...”). Further, it is hereby ordered that said Plan shall be used in all 

forthcoming elections to the General Assembly until the next constitutionally-mandated 

reapportionment shall be approved. 

All outstanding motions filed in the above-captioned matters are hereby 

DISMISSED.

This Court’s February 23, 2022 Order, at Judicial Administration Docket No. 569, 

which temporarily suspended the General Primary Election calendar relative to elections 

for seats in the General Assembly, is VACATED. Our adjustment to that calendar is 

resolved by separate order at that docket number and entered today.

Jurisdiction relinquished.