Affirmed and Opinion Filed May 26, 2015 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00490-CR 

No. 05-14-00491-CR 

No. 05-14-00492-CR 

No. 05-14-00493-CR 

JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. F10-33944-M, F10-33945-M, F12-33914-M, F12-34048-M 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck 

Opinion by Justice Bridges 

Jimil Johnte Brown appeals four convictions, after adjudication of his guilt, for two 

offenses of delivery of marijuana in an amount over one-fourth ounce, one theft of property 

offense, and one offense of possession of cocaine in an amount less than one gram. See TEX.

HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. §§ 481.115(a), (b), 481.120(a), (b)(3) (West 2010); TEX. PENAL 

CODE ANN. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(A) (West Supp. 2014). The trial court assessed punishment in 

each case at twenty months’ confinement in a state jail. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a 

brief in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets 
‐2‐ 

the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional 

evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See 

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a 

copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he 

did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases). 

 We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree 

the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably 

support the appeals. 

 We affirm the trial court’s judgments. 

Do Not Publish 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47 

140490F.U05 

/David L. Bridges/ 

DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE 
‐3‐ 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant 

No. 05-14-00490-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the 194th Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F10-33944-M). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, 

Justices Lang and Schenck participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered May 26, 2015 
‐4‐ 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant 

No. 05-14-00491-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the 194th Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F10-33945-M). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, 

Justices Lang and Schenck participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered May 26, 2015. 
‐5‐ 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant 

No. 05-14-00492-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the 194th Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F12-33914-M). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, 

Justices Lang and Schenck participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered May 26, 2015. 
‐6‐ 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JIMIL JOHNTE BROWN, Appellant 

No. 05-14-00493-CR V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

 Appeal from the 194th Judicial District 

Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F12-34048-M). 

Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, 

Justices Lang and Schenck participating. 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Judgment entered May 26, 2015.