alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, As Adopted**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

 

**In connection with the Annual Report of Whitney Information Network,Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Russell A. Whitney, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated:  March 29, 2004

 

 
|   |   |   |   |   | /s/Russell  A. Whitney          |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   |   |   | Name:  Russell A. Whitney       |   |
|   |   |   |   |   | Title: Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

----
# C_2011153EN.01000801.xml

| 24.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/8

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/273/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures against Syria apply

2011/C 153/04

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/273/CFSP (1), as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2011/303/CFSP (2), and in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 (3), as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 504/2011 (4), concerning restrictive measures against Syria.

1

2

3

4

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/273/CFSP and in Regulation (EU) No 442/2011.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 442/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 6 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned lists should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, and fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 121, 10.5.2011, p. 11.

1

(2)  OJ L 136, 24.5.2011, p. 95.

2

(3)  OJ L 121, 10.5.2011, p. 1.

3

(4)  OJ L 136, 24.5.2011, p. 45.

4

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ALVIN C. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cv74/MCR/CJK

R. QUINN, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated October 20, 2011 (doc. 82). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have

been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, the court

determines that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 58) is GRANTED.

2. This cause be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for plaintiff’s abuse of the judicial process.

3. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Dismiss Dismissal of Complaint by Defendants’

Undersigned Counsel with Leave of Court to Amend Complaint Disclosing Prior Filings .

. .” (doc. 68) is DENIED.

4. Plaintiff’s “Amended Motion to Dismiss Dismissal of Complaint by

Defendants’ Undersigned Counsel with Leave of Court to Amend Complaint disclosing

Prior Filings to Include Appeals” (doc. 80) is DENIED. 

5. Defendants’ motion to strike (doc. 79) is DENIED.

Case 3:10-cv-00074-MCR-CJK Document 83 Filed 11/23/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

6. All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.

7. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of November, 2011.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 3:10cv74/MCR/CJK

Case 3:10-cv-00074-MCR-CJK Document 83 Filed 11/23/11 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | In connection with the
 accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of First Transaction Management,,
 Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2007, I, Susan Schreter, Chief
 Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | Such amended Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
 year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section
 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                              
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on
 Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of First
 Transaction Management, Inc for such period.

| |                                    
| | -----------------------------------
| | FIRST
 TRANSACTION MANAGEMENT, INC.

|                        |  |     |                                    
|----------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------------------
|Dated: February 4, 2008 |  | By: | /s/ Susan Schreter                 
|                        |  |     |                                    
|                        |  |     | Susan Schreter, Chief Executive and
|                        |  |     | Chief Financial Officer            

---
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DOUGLAS MIHALIK,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv67/LAC/EMT

EXPRESSJET AIRLINES d/b/a 

CONTINENTAL EXPRESS

and GEORGE SEMAK,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated March 4, 2010 (Doc. 3). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the objections filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction and the clerk is directed to close the

file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23 day of March, 2010. rd

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 208 (Monday, October 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 61196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5373]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5964]


Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Subcommittee on IMO Administration and Budgeting of the 
Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) will conduct an open meeting from 
9:30 to noon on Friday, 9 November 2007, in Room 6103, at U.S. Coast 
Guard Headquarters, 2100 Second St., SW., Washington, DC 20593. The 
purpose of the meeting is to finalize preparations for the 24th 
Extraordinary Session of Council, 99th Session of Council and 25th 
Session of the Assembly of the International Maritime Organization 
(IMO), which are scheduled for 15-30 November 2007, in London. 
Discussion will focus on papers received and draft U.S. positions.
    Agenda items of particular interest include: Reports of IMO 
Committees; Reports on Diplomatic Conferences; IMO Work Program and 
Budget for 2008-2009; and Election of Members of IMO Council.
    Members of the public may attend this SHC meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. Interested persons may seek information by 
writing: Director, National and International Standards, U.S. Coast 
Guard Headquarters, Commandant (CG-52), Room 1304, 2100 2nd St., SW., 
Washington, DC 20593 or by contacting LCDR Kevin Ferrie at (202) 372-
1357 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ce85abb8a7a0e08ce088abbcbca7ab8ebbbdada9e0a3a7a2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8f3ddced1d696fa96feddcacad1ddf8cdcbdbdf96d5d1d4">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: October 18, 2007.
Mark W. Skolnicki,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating, Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 07-5373 Filed 10-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
THE STATE EX REL. KRINER, APPELLANT, v. LTV STEEL COMPANY ET AL.,

APPELLEES. 

[Cite as State ex rel. Kriner v. LTV Steel Co. (1998), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 

Workers’ compensation -- Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. 

(No. 97-1183 – Submitted October 27, 1998 – Decided December 30, 1998.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APD05-657. 

__________________ 

 Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Rachel B. Jaffy, for 

appellant. 

 Manchester, Bennett, Powers & Ullman, L.P.A., and Joseph R. Young, Jr., 

for appellee LTV Steel Co. 

 Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Michael A. Vanderhorst, 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. 

__________________ 

 The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion 

of the court of appeals. 

 MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON,

JJ., concur. 

 F.E. SWEENEY,J., dissents.
#### STATE v. POPLIN

No. 215P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 304.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 June 1982.
#### TRUCKING CO. v. PHILLIPS

No. 134 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 85.

Petition by defendants for reconsideration of denial of discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

# AGENCY:

National Park Service, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of committee renewal.

# SUMMARY:

This notice is published in accordance with Section 9(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C. Appendix). Following consultation with the General Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Secretary of the Interior has formally renewed the Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program Advisory Council to provide advice and recommendations on program guidance relating to Route 6 Corridor preservation. Public Law 106-45 (16 U.S.C. 461 note), August 10, 1999, authorizes the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the National Park Service, to provide a program of technical assistance and grants that will set priorities for the preservation of the Route 66 corridor, which passes through Illinois, Missouri, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, New Mexico, Arizona and California. Members of the committee represent states through which Route 66 passes, non-profit Route 66 preservation entities and other interested organizations.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Michael Taylor, National Park Service, Long Distance Trails Group Office—Santa Fe, P.O. Box 728, 1100 Old Santa                               ( print page 59308)                            Fe Trail, Santa Fe, NM 87504-0728; (505) 988-6742.                    

## Certification

I hereby certify that the administrative establishment of the Route 66 Corridor Preservation Program Advisory Council is necessary and in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Department of the Interior by the Route 66 Corridor Preservation Act of 1999 (16 U.S.C. 461 note).

Dated: August 6, 2007.

Dirk Kempthorne,

Secretary of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 07-5164 Filed 10-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-52-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
     INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM 10-Q
     AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  AUG-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    OCT-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1000
<CASH>                          2357
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   6683
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     63613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                72653
<PP&E>                          53763
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  170176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           25650
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        90
<OTHER-SE>                      (25166)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    170176
<SALES>                         93962
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                93962
<CGS>                           60511
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   60511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                26956
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              525
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             3759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 2833
<INCOME-TAX>                    14
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    6053
<EPS-BASIC>                   0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.67


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION  OF  PRINCIPAL  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER  AND  PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


      In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of The
Project Group, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, the undersigned
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

(1)   such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31,
      2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations.


April 12,  2004                    /s/ Craig Crawford
                                  -----------------------------------------
                                  Name:  Craig Crawford
                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                         Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7393** 

DONALD WAYNE BRIGHT , Petitioner

– Appellant ,
v. CYNTHIA THORNTON; FRANK L. PERRY , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:14

- hc

- 02232

- BO )

Submitted : January 26, 2016 Decided: March 8, 2016

Before KING and AGEE , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Donald Wayne Bright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donald Wayne Bright seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 ( 2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constit utional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims i s debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural rul ing is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bright has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Derbyshire Machine & Tool Co. ) ASBCA No. 62671

- ADR

)

Under Contract No. SPE7M3

- 19

- P

- 4007 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Mr. Paul Trenholm

President

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA Chief Trial Attorney

John J. Pritchard, Esq.

Eric C. Selke, Esq.

Trial Attorneys

DLA Land and Maritime

Columbus, OH

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: January 12 , 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62671

- ADR

, Appeal of Derbyshire

Machine & Tool Co. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: January 12, 2022 JAMES R. SWEET

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit
32.2




Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-k for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhong Ya Li, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
April 15, 2010





GFR
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.





/s/Zhong
      Ya LiZhong
      Ya Li, Chief Financial Officer