alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cr27/RS-LB

HECTOR MENDOZA

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Government’s unopposed motion for an order of dismissal 

(Doc. 28). Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 48(a), the indictment is dismissed. The 

Clerk is directed to close the file. 

ORDERED on May 28, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### STATE v. SNYDER

No. 12 PC.

Case below: 31 N.C. App. 745.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 March 1977.
EXHIBIT
4.1


 


DESCRIPTION
OF TABLE TRAC, INC. COMMON STOCK


 


The
following description of the common stock of Table Trac, Inc. (“Company”) is a summary and does not purport to be
complete. It is qualified by the Company’s Articles of Incorporation and Amended and Restated Bylaws, which are incorporated
by reference to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


 


The
authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 25,000,000 shares of capital stock, $0.001 par value per share. All shares
of common stock have equal voting rights and are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted upon by Company stockholders.
Shares of Company common stock have no preemptive, subscription, conversion or redemption rights and may be issued only as fully-paid
and non-assessable shares. Cumulative voting in the election of directors is not permitted. In the event of liquidation, each
holder of common stock is entitled to receive a proportionate share of our assets available for distribution to stockholders after
the payment of liabilities. All shares of common stock presently issued and outstanding are fully-paid and non-assessable.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT LOUIS DEES, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:10cv33-WS

ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF'S

DEP'T, 

Defendant.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 32)

docketed January 25, 2011. The magistrate judge recommends that this case be

dismissed for the plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court. The plaintiff has

filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for the plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court.
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 23th day of February , 2011.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
ex420





  EXHIBIT
4.20







	


Extension of Debenture Maturity Date


 


	

TO


 

	

Intellipharmaceutics
International Inc. (the “Company”)


 


	

RE:


 

	

Debenture
dated May 1, 2019, with an original face amount of US$1,050,000
issued by the Company to Dr. Isa Odidi and Dr. Amina Odidi (the
“Debenture”) and
the Maturity Date (as defined in the Debenture) of such
Debenture


 







 


The
undersigned hereby agree that the Maturity Date of the Debenture
(currently February 1, 2020) is extended to March 31,
2020.

 


DATED
effective January 31, 2020.

 


	/s/
Isa Odidi
	
 /s/ Amina
Odidi



	
Isa Odidi


	Amina Odidi
#### SCALLON v. HOOPER

No. 493P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 551.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982.
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 

William Lyon Homes, Inc. 

State of Incorporation: California

 

Presley Homes 

State of Incorporation: California 

 

California Equity Funding, Inc. 

State of Incorporation:California 

 

PH Ventures — San Jose 

State of Incorporation: California 

 

Presley CMR, Inc. 

State of Incorporation: California

 

HSP Inc. 

State of Incorporation: California 

 

Duxford Financial, Inc. 

State of Incorporation: California

 

William Lyon Southwest, Inc. 

State of Incorporation: Arizona 

 

Mountain Gate Ventures, Inc. 

State of Incorporation: Arizona

 

PH—LP Ventures 

State of Incorporation: California 

 

PH—Rielly Ventures 

State of Incorporation: Arizona

 

Duxford Title Reinsurance Company 

State of Incorporation: Vermont 

 

Sycamore CC, Inc. 

State of Incorporation: California

 

Other names under which William Lyon Homes conducts business: 

 

William Lyon Homes—Southern California Division 

 

William Lyon Homes—Northern California Division 

 

William Lyon Homes—San Diego Division 

 

William Lyon Homes—Arizona Division 

 

William Lyon Homes—Nevada Division 

 

Horsethief Canyon Partners 

Cerro Plata Associates, LLC 

 

CP at Forster Ranch, L.P. 

 

Fairway Farms, LLC 

 

St. Helena WestminsterEstates, LLC 

 

Laurel Creek Associates, LLC 

 

Atlanta & Beach, L.P. 

 

Woodlake, L.P. 

 

Stonebriar L.P. 

 

Reston Associates, LLC 

 

Hampton RoadAssociates, LLC 

 

Henry Ranch, LLC 

 

Otay R-29, LLC 

 

4S Lot 12, LLC 

 

Bayport Mortgage, L.P. 

 

DV I Thousand Oaks, L.P. 

 

Lyon Moorpark, L.P.

 

OX I Oxnard, L.P. 

 

OX II Oxnard, L.P. 

 

4S Lots 2 & 8, LLC 

 

Silver Creek Preserve 

 

California Pacific Mortgage, L.P. 

 

Duxford Escrow, Inc. 

 

Valencia Partners, L.P. 

 

Brentwood Legends, L.P. 

 

Hercules Overlook,L.P. 

 

Valencia II Associates, LLC 

 

Tustin Villas Partners, LLC 

 

Marble Mountain Partners, LLC 

 

Tustin Vistas Partners, LLC 

 

Moffett Meadows Partners, LLC 

 

Lyon MorganCreek, L.P. 

 

Lyon Harada, L.P. 

 

242 Cerro Plata, LLC 

 

Lyon East Garrison Company I, LLC 

 

East Garrison Partners I, LLC 

 

Lyon Waterfront, LLC 

 

PLC/Lyon WaterfrontResidential, LLC 

 

Carmel Mountain Ranch 

 

The Ranch Golf Club Co. 

 

Chino Reserve 89, LLC 

 

Montecito Ranch-Corona, L.P. 

 

Lyon Montecito, LLC 

 

Spectrum 90 Investors,LLC 

 

48 Ranch Planning Area 38, LLC 

 

San Miguel Village, LLC 

 

Lyon Treviso, LLC 

 

Covenant Hills P-30A, LLC 

 

Covenant Hills P-30B, LLC
**Exhibit10.1**

 

 

**STRAIGHT NOTE**

 

 
| $150,000 | South El Monte, California | December 3, 2003 |
|----------|----------------------------|------------------|

 

 

For value received, Lee Pharmaceuticals promises topay Leah DiSalvo or order, at South El Monte, California the sum of ONE HUNDREDFIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS, with interest from December 3, 2003, on unpaidprincipal at the rate of twenty-four (24) percent for a ninety (90) dayperiod.  Principal plus accrued interestwill be due and payable on March 1, 2004. Interest shall be calculated on the basis of the unpaid principal balancedaily, based on a 365-day year, actual day month.  Principal and interest shall be payable in lawful money of theUnited States.  If action wereinstituted on this note, I promise to pay such sum as the Court may fix asattorney’s fees.  This note isunsecured.

 

 
| DECEMBER 1, 2003 |   |                                     | RONALD G. LEE      |   |
|------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
| Date             |   | Lee Pharmaceuticals - Ronald G. Lee      |
|             |   |                                     |
|             |   |                                     |
| DECEMBER 1, 2003 |   |                                     | MICHAEL L. AGRESTI |   |
| Date             |   | Lee Pharmaceuticals - Michael L. Agresti |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF LIBERTY CORPORATION FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         1,590,361
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      81,043
<MORTGAGE>                                     238,362
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   59,436
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,092,349
<CASH>                                          25,064
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             280,208
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         337,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,069,267
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,874,189
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  33,916
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                           29,126
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                210,396
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           45,182
<PREFERRED>                                     20,999
<COMMON>                                       163,303
<OTHER-SE>                                     426,017
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,069,267
<PREMIUMS>                                     175,362
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             78,332
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               6,011
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  70,666
<BENEFITS>                                     116,656
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     21,938
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            73,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,972
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,707
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,265
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.63
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. SIZEMORE

No. 181 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 347.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975. ■ .
#### STATE v. HAYES

No. 220 PC.

Case below: 46 N.C. App. 607.

. Application by defendant for further review denied 8 July 1981.
Exhibit 32.1



Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of IVAX Diagnostics, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Giorgio DUrso, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



|1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 31, 2005



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Giorgio DUrso     
|Giorgio DUrso,        
|Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6321

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. WINCY JOSEPH, a/k/a Joseph Wincey , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville

. Kenneth D. Bell , District Judge. ( 5:13

- cr - 00080

- KDB

- DSC

- 2 ; 5:17

- cv 00212

- KDB )

Submitted : November 30, 2021 Decided: January 10, 2022

Before KING, AGEE, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Wincy Joseph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 20-6321 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/10/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Wincy Joseph seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appealability will not i ssue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling i s debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclud e that Joseph has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cou rt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 20-6321 Doc: 14 Filed: 01/10/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS     Document 7      Filed 10/31/2007     Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LORENZO SANCHEZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D23-616

[July 20, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Susan L. Alspector,

Judge; L.T. Case No. 05-10755CF10A.

Lorenzo Sanchez, Sneads, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., Wednesday, October 23, 2007.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters To Be Considered:

Enforcement Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-4948  Filed 10-2-07; 11:22 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7818** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ENERVA W. TROTMAN, a/k/a Charles Carlos Clark , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville
. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. ( 4:91

- cr - 00092

- H

- 1 ; 4:13

- cv - 00026

- H )

Submitted : March 25, 2014 Decided: March 28, 2014

Before GREGORY, KEENAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Enerva W. Trotman , Appellant Pro Se. John Howarth Bennett , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Greenville, North Carolina; Seth Morgan Wood , OFFICE OF THE UNIT ED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Enerva W. Trotman seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. T he order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
2 8 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wro ng. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutio nal right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Trotman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal3 c ontentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### STATE v. LIVINGSTON

No. 20 PC.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 346.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 September 1974.
Case 3:10-cv-00100-LC -EMT Document 51 Filed 11/08/10 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:10-cv-00100-LC -EMT Document 51 Filed 11/08/10 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:10-cv-00100-LC -EMT Document 51 Filed 11/08/10 Page 3 of 3
#### STATE v. GUY and STATE v. YANDLE

No. 138 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 208.

Petition by defendant Yandle for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 12 January 1982.
EXHIBIT 13.1


                                 Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certification

      The following Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Section 906 Certification is
furnished to (not file with) the Securities and Exchange Commission:

      In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of CNOOC Limited, we,
Chengyu Fu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Hua Yang, Chief
Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, of CNOOC Limited certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    This annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      CNOOC Limited.



Date:  June 26, 2006



                                By:  /s/ Chengyu Fu
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                Name:   Chengyu Fu
                                Title:  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



                                By: /s/ Hua Yang
                                     ---------------------------------------
                                Name:   Hua Yang
                                Title:  Chief Financial Officer
                                        and Executive Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         236,184
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,583,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                    71,800
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,869,295
<PP&E>                                       2,330,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                 689,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,644,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          762,021
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,940
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,512,269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,644,625
<SALES>                                      2,821,599
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,821,599
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,786,780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              59,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,606)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,571
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,606)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (32,177)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PHILLIP J. KENNEDY,

Plaintiff,

v. 3:10cv60-WS

JOHN GLASSMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 6)

docketed July 1, 2010. The magistrate judge recommends that this case be dismissed

without prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the court. 

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The plaintiff's complaint, and this action, are hereby DISMISSED without

prejudice for failure to comply with an order of the court and for failure to prosecute. 

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

 
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of July , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE