alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011187EN.01001501.xml

| 28.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/15

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2011/C 187/09

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Certain frozen strawberries | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 407/2007 (OJ L 100, 17.4.2007, p. 1) | 18.4.2012 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Certain frozen strawberries

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 407/2007 (OJ L 100, 17.4.2007, p. 1)

18.4.2012

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
#### HOFLER v. HILL

No. 457PA82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 201.

Petition by defendants Hill for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 October 1982.
Exhibit 11

<TABLE>
              COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE




                                                      
                             Three Months Ended       Six Months Ended
                                  June 30,               June 30, 
                            --------------------    --------------------
                              1998        1997        1998        1997   
                            --------    --------    --------    --------
<S>                         <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
EARNINGS
--------

Earnings from
Continuing Operations       $2,682,915  $1,822,687  $5,122,832  $3,133,677
Loss from
Discontinued Operations             --     (16,548)         --    (222,656)
                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
   Net Earnings             $2,682,915  $1,806,139  $5,122,832  $2,911,021
                            ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

SHARES
------

Weighted Average Number of
Common Shares Outstanding    4,860,132   4,806,737   4,848,075   4,797,847
(See Note)
Additional Shares Assuming
Conversion of Stock Options    267,026      75,463     240,385      77,036  
                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
Weighted Average Common
Shares Outstanding
and Equivalents              5,127,158   4,882,200   5,088,460   4,874,883
                            ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

Basic Earnings Per Share:
 Earnings from
 Continuing Operations      $      .55  $      .38  $     1.06  $      .65
 Loss from
 Discontinued Operations            --          --          --        (.04)
                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
   Net Earnings             $      .55  $      .38  $     1.06  $      .61
                            ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
 Earnings from
 Continuing Operations      $      .52  $      .37  $     1.01  $      .64
 Loss from
 Discontinued Operations            --          --          --        (.04)
                            ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
   Net Earnings             $      .52  $      .37  $     1.01  $      .60
                            ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========


Note:  All activity during the year has been adjusted for the number of
days in the year that the shares were outstanding.

</TABLE>
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FERNANDO HERNANDEZ GOMEZ,

a.k.a. Fernando Hernandez,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50037

D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00850-GAF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Fernando Hernandez Gomez appeals from the 70-month sentence imposed

following his guilty-plea conviction for being an illegal alien found in the United

FILED

FEB 23 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50037

States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

Hernandez Gomez first contends that the district court committed procedural

error by imposing a sentence based on clearly erroneous facts and by giving

excessive weight to one of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors while giving

insufficient weight to the others. 

Hernandez Gomez has not demonstrated that any of the alleged factual

errors by the district court affected his substantial rights. See United States v.

Dallman, 533 F.3d 755, 761-62 (9th Cir. 2008). His other contention of procedural

error is belied by the record. 

Hernandez Gomez next contends that his sentence is substantively

unreasonable. Given the age of Hernandez Gomez’s prior conviction and the other

aspects of his criminal history, application of the 16-level prior conviction

enhancement did not result in an unreasonable sentence in this case. See United

States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108-09 (9th Cir. 2010). The record

reflects that the 70-month sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the

totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See Gall v.

United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). 
3 10-50037

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062

(9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it

delete from the judgment the reference to section 1326(b)(2). We decline to

instruct the district court to conform the written judgment to the oral

pronouncement of sentence by deleting the phrase “or ordinance,” because there is

no conflict between them. See United States v. Hicks, 997 F.2d 594, 597 (9th Cir.

1993) (written judgment should be amended where it is inconsistent with oral

pronouncement).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct the judgment.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0454

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

NEIL LYNN NUNES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time to 

produce transcripts on appeal, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Court Reporter Julie Pesanti 

DeLong is granted an extension of time to and including October 14,

2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve the transcripts requested 

on appeal. 

The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order upon the district court 

and the court reporter.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 24 2022

08/24/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0454
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6541
RICKEY R. LLOYD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL WALKER; KEVIN HARRELLSON; ROBERT WHITE; JIMMY EVANS; SERGEANT DICKERSON, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-202-5-F) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rickey R. Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissingas frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the d istrict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lloyd v. Walker , No. CA-96-202-5-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2011330EN.01000901.xml

| 12.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/9

---

Commission communication pursuant to Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations

2011/C 330/06

| Member State | Finland |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Mariehamn (MHQ)–Stockholm Arlanda (ARN) |
| Period of validity of the contract | 1 March 2012-29 February 2016 |
| Deadline for submission of applications and tenders | 63rd calendar day after publishing |
| Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained | Ålands landskapsregering |
| PB 1060 |
| AX-22111 Mariehamn |
| Åland |
| SUOMI/FINLAND |
| E-mail: registrator@regeringen.ax |

Member State

Finland

Route concerned

Mariehamn (MHQ)–Stockholm Arlanda (ARN)

Period of validity of the contract

1 March 2012-29 February 2016

Deadline for submission of applications and tenders

63rd calendar day after publishing

Address from which the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public tender and the public service obligation can be obtained

Ålands landskapsregering

PB 1060

AX-22111 Mariehamn

Åland

SUOMI/FINLAND

E-mail: registrator@regeringen.ax

---
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-43 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-43 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-43 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-43 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 99.2**

**STATEMENT OF THECHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF KNOLOGY, INC.****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. S. 1350**

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity asan officer of Knology, Inc. (the “Company”) that, to his knowledge, this annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:   March 31, 2003

|   |   |   |                                           |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|        |   |   | /s/ ROBERT K. MILLS                            |
|   |   |   |                                                |
|   |   |   | **Robert K. Mills****Chief Financial Officer** |

-1-
<PAGE> 1

                                Exhibit 11

<TABLE>
                             Computation of Net Earnings Per Common Share


                              Three Months Ended         Nine Months Ended
                                 September 30,             September 30,
                           ------------------------   ------------------------
                              1999         1998          1999         1998
                           -----------  -----------   -----------  -----------
  <S>                      <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>
  EARNINGS
  --------

  Net Earnings             $ 1,662,705  $ 2,355,637   $ 6,579,924  $ 7,478,469
                           ===========  ===========   ===========  ===========
  SHARES
  ------

  Weighted Average Number
   of Common Shares
   Outstanding (See Note)    5,908,312    5,512,901     5,898,529    5,072,119

  Additional Shares
   Assuming Conversion
   of Stock Options             86,098      207,186        86,313      227,956
                           -----------  -----------   -----------  -----------
  Weighted Average
   Common Shares
   Outstanding and
   Equivalents               5,994,410    5,720,087     5,984,842    5,300,075
                           ===========  ===========   ===========  ===========

  Basic Net Earnings
   Per Share               $       .28  $       .43   $      1.12  $      1.47
                           ===========  ===========   ===========  ===========

  Diluted Net Earnings
   Per Share               $       .28  $       .41   $      1.10  $      1.41
                           ===========  ===========   ===========  ===========


    Note:  All activity during the year has been adjusted for the number of
           days in the year that the shares were outstanding.
</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


             CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference to the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Number 333-47696) of our report dated March
16, 2001 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of E-xact
Transactions Ltd. as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, which report is included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-Ksb of E-xact Transactions Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2000.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, British Columbia
April 16, 2001
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CARLOS ALMEIDA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv4-SPM/WCS

LAWRENCE REEL, Warden, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation dated February 24, 2010 (doc. 6). Plaintiff has been afforded

an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. Having considered the report and

recommendation, I have determined that the report and recommendation should

be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 6) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and

failure to comply with court orders. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of March, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

897 KAH 11-02615 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. FRANK DUDLEY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

SIBATU KHAHAIFA, SUPERINTENDENT, ORLEANS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK K. WALSH OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Orleans County (James P. Punch, A.J.), dated August 25, 2011 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment denied the petition.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
COURT OF A PPEAL S EI GHTH D I STRI CT OF TEX AS ELPASO, TEXAS

I N THE I NTEREST OF
E.K.S. AND B .P.H., I V, CHI L DREN. § § § § § § No. 08-10-00268- CV

Appea l from 109th District Court of Andre ws County , Texas (TC # 18,037)

MEMORAN DUM OP INION Pending b ef

o re t h e Court is Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appea l pursuant to
T E X .R.A P P .P. 42.1(a) (1) beca use Appellant no longe r desires to prosec ute the appea l. We g rant the motion and dismi ss the appea l with prejudice.

November

30, 2010 ANN CRAWFORD McCL URE, J ustice
Be fore Chew, C.J ., McClure, a nd Rivera, JJ

.
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.3
 RECEIVABLES TRUSTEES OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
 GRACECHURCH RECEIVABLES TRUSTEE LIMITED
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the Receivables Trustee;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the Receivables Trustee; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Receivables Trustee has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of the Investor Certificate for the period between January 1, 2005 and
December 31, 2005.
   By:
    
    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:    Paul Gerard Turner
Title:      Director
 - 31 -
#### JONES v. DEPT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES

No. 150 PC.

No. 105 (Spring Term).

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 116.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 6 February 1980.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

GAINESVILLE DIVISION 

SHERRIE RUSSELL-BROWN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 USCA Case No. 10-14328-D 

v. 

USDC Case No. 1:09-cv-00257-MP-GRJ 

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, 

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, 

LEVIN COLLEGE OF LAW, and 

ROBERT H. JERRY, II, in his 

individual and official capacities as 

Dean of the University of Florida, 

Levin College of Law, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

___________________________________/ 

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT’S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF HER MOTION 

FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. 157) 

 

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff-Appellant Sherrie Russell-Brown 

(“Plaintiff-Appellant” or “Ms. Russell-Brown”) and notifies this Court and all parties hereto: 

1. On October 1, 2010, Plaintiff-Appellant filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis

(Doc. 157), regarding Notice of Appeal (Doc. 147) and Amended Notice of Appeal (Doc. 156). 

2. On November 10, 2010, the appellate filing fees regarding the above-captioned Appeal 

No. 10-14328-D were paid in full and transmitted to the Eleventh Circuit (Docs. 164 and 165). 

3. Consequently, Plaintiff-Appellant’s application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal 

(Doc. 157) as well as this Court’s Order (Doc. 161) requiring Plaintiff-Appellant to provide copies of 

documents by Monday, November 15, 2010, in support thereof, are moot. 

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -GRJ Document 166 Filed 11/12/10 Page 1 of 2
2

DATED this 12th day of November, 2010. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Lennox S. Hinds

Lennox S. Hinds 

New York Bar No. 8196 

Stevens, Hinds & White, PC 

116 West 111th Street 

New York, NY 10026-4206 

(212) 864-4445 

(212) 222-2680 (fax) 

lawfirmshw@yahoo.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellant 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 12, 2010, the foregoing has been filed with the 

Clerk of the Court and served electronically by using the CM/ECF system, upon the following: 

Ian S. Marx, Esq. 

Greenberg Taurig, LLP 

200 Park Avenue 

Florham Park, NJ 07932 

Richard C. McCrea, Jr., Esq. 

Greenberg Taurig, LLP 

Courthouse Plaza, Suite 100 

625 East Twiggs Street 

Tampa, FL 33602 

Attorneys for Defendants-Appellees 

/s/ Lennox S. Hinds

Lennox S. Hinds 

Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellant 

 

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -GRJ Document 166 Filed 11/12/10 Page 2 of 2
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2211 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to authorize the expansion of the 

Appalachian development highway system. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Mr. MANCHIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to authorize the 

expansion of the Appalachian development highway system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fixing Our Country 

5 Roads Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF APPALACHIAN DEVELOPMENT 

7 HIGHWAY SYSTEM. 

8 Section 14501 of title 40, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2211 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a), in the second sentence, by 

2 striking ‘‘three thousand and ninety miles’’ and in3 serting ‘‘the total number of miles established by the 

4 Secretary under subsection (h)’’; and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(h) EXPANSION OF THE APPALACHIAN DEVELOP7 MENT HIGHWAY SYSTEM.—As soon as practicable after 

8 the date of enactment of this subsection, the Secretary 

9 shall establish the total number of miles that is authorized 

10 to be constructed for the Appalachian development high11 way system under subsection (a) based on— 

12 ‘‘(1) a report prepared by the Secretary before 

13 the date of enactment of this subsection in which the 

14 Secretary describes the total number of miles that 

15 should be authorized to be constructed for the Appa16 lachian development highway system under sub17 section (a); or 

18 ‘‘(2) if the Secretary determines that there is 

19 not an existing report that addresses the matters de20 scribed in paragraph (1), a report prepared by the 

21 Secretary, in consultation with the Appalachian Re22 gional Commission and applicable State departments 

23 of transportation, as soon as practicable after the 

24 date of enactment of this subsection, that describes 

25 the total number of miles that should be authorized 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
3 

•S 2211 IS

1 to be constructed for the Appalachian development 

2 highway system under subsection (a).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS