alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2035 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2035

  To require the Transportation Security Administration to develop a 
   strategic plan to expand eligibility for the PreCheck Program to 
 individuals with Transportation Worker Identification Credentials or 
                   Hazardous Materials Endorsements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2019

  Ms. Duckworth (for herself and Mr. Young) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Transportation Security Administration to develop a 
   strategic plan to expand eligibility for the PreCheck Program to 
 individuals with Transportation Worker Identification Credentials or 
                   Hazardous Materials Endorsements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TSA Credential and Endorsement 
Harmonization Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. STRATEGIC PLAN TO EXPAND PRECHECK PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Transportation Security 
Administration shall develop a strategic plan to expand eligibility for 
the PreCheck Program under section 44919 of title 49, United States 
Code, to individuals who have--
            (1) a Transportation Worker Identification Credential 
        issued under section 70105 of title 46, United States Code; or
            (2) a Hazardous Materials Endorsement under the Hazardous 
        Materials Endorsement Threat Assessment Program on the State-
        issued commercial driver's license of the individual.
    (b) Elements.--In developing the strategic plan required by 
subsection (a), the Administrator shall ensure that the plan--
            (1) allows individuals described in subsection (a) to opt 
        in to the PreCheck Program; and
            (2) provides the Transportation Security Administration 
        with the discretion--
                    (A) to determine whether an individual described in 
                subsection (a) meets the eligibility requirements for 
                the Program; and
                    (B) to establish alternative fee structures for the 
                Program.
    (c) Briefing to Congress.--Not later than 30 days after developing 
the strategic plan required by subsection (a), the Administrator shall 
brief the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the 
Senate and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of 
Representatives on the strategic plan.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      329
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,085
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   221
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (152)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     69
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (24)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 45
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        45
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

                   -------------------------------------------


In connection with the Annual Report of Parentech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Landow, Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  October 11, 2004


                                    /s/ Scott Landow
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Scott Landow, Chief Accounting Officer
10244752.1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

JOSEPH STEVENS & COMPANY, INC. 

Plaintiff, 

- against - 

DAVID CIKANEK 

Defendant. 

NOTICE OF 

APPEARANCE

07 Civ. 3385 

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES OF RECORD: 

Enter my appearance as counsel in this case on behalf of plaintiff Joseph Stevens & 

Company, Inc. I certify that I am admitted to practice in the Southern District of New York. 

Dated: New York, New York 

May 8, 2007 

 NIXON PEABODY LLP 

 By: __/s/ Alison B. Cohen____ 

 Alison B. Cohen (AC-7702) 

 437 Madison Avenue 

New York, New York 10022 

(212) 940-3000 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

 Joseph Stevens & Company, Inc. 

Case 1:07-cv-03385-BSJ-KNF Document 8 Filed 05/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               9
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      909
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (171)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,128
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,770
<PP&E>                                           6,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,158)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,442
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,116
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           413
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,383)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,442
<SALES>                                          6,402
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,017
<CGS>                                            2,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,315
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (859)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (859)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (859)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
' 

ELE~'~RONIC~LLY FILED 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT C:O~T 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

ORDER 

IN KE: 

Fosarnax Products Liability Litigation 

This Docirment Rckutes to All Cases 

- 

I'I' IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mike Miller of the firm Solberg, Stewart, Millcr & 

Tjon, located at 1129 5"' Avenue South, Fargo, ND 58103, he, and in the sanic hcrchy is, 

Case No: 1 :Oh-MD-1789 

admitted Pro Hur I,'rr.ta as it pertains to the above-referenced ljtigatiorl of this Courl. 

DATED this .!L ' day of May. 20C)S. 

>, , -, -; .' 

BY: ,:( I< . b, , 77(' (- a c=/. ,i 

- ' JOHN F. KEENAN . 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 31 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 1 of 2
A0 13hA {Kcv.9!98) Certificate of Good Standing 

United States District Court 

District of North Dakota 

CERTIFICATE OF 

GOOD STANDING 

I, Robert Anslcy, Clerk of this Court, certif). thal 

Mike Miller was duly admitted to 

practicc in this Court on March 9, 1970, 

and is in good standing in this Court. 

Dated at Fargo. Nnrth Ihkota on May 1, 2008. 

Robert finslc\: , 

Clcrk 

, , -. ', ,& 

.C , ..-c ( . , ,: ; ; [. r 

! Dq' Deput), C:lcik - 1,cah Riveland-Foster 

Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 31 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03542-LAK Document 4 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

OMNIBUS AMENDMENTS TO THE 

REGULATIONS OF THE 

PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL ETHICS 

ADVISORY BOARD

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 614

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2024, pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of 

the Constitution of Pennsylvania, IT IS ORDERED that:

The Regulations of the Pennsylvania Judicial Ethics Advisory Board are amended 

in the attached form. 

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. 103(b) and shall be 

effective immediately. 

Additions to the rules are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rules are shown in bold and in brackets.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2099 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2099

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2019

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To redesignate the Sullys Hill National Game Preserve in the State of 
      North Dakota as the White Horse Hill National Game Preserve.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``White Horse Hill National Game 
Preserve Designation Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WHITE HORSE HILL NATIONAL GAME PRESERVE, NORTH 
              DAKOTA.

    (a) Redesignation.--The first section of the Act of March 3, 1931 
(46 Stat. 1509, chapter 439; 16 U.S.C. 674a), is amended by striking 
``Sullys Hill National Game Preserve'' and inserting ``White Horse Hill 
National Game Preserve''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 2 of the Act of March 3, 1931 
(46 Stat. 1509, chapter 439; 16 U.S.C. 674b), is amended by striking 
``Sullys Hill National Game Preserve'' and inserting ``White Horse Hill 
National Game Preserve''.
    (c) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Sullys Hill National 
Game Preserve shall be considered to be a reference to the ``White 
Horse Hill National Game Preserve''.

            Passed the Senate November 14, 2019.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 1 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 2 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 3 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 4 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 5 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 6 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 7 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 8 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 9 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 10 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 11 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 12 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 13 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 14 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 15 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 16 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 17 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 18 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 19 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 20 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 21 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 22 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 23 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 24 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 25 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 26 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 27 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 28 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 29 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 30 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 31 of 32
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 9-3 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 32 of 32
# C_2011147EN.01000901.xml

| 18.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/9

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production of agricultural products and amending Regulation (EC) No 70/2001

2011/C 147/05

Aid No: SA.32719 (11/XA)

Member State: Austria

Region: Vorarlberg

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving an individual aid: Richtlinie der Vorarlberger Landesregierung zur Förderung der Tierzucht und Viehwirtschaft

Legal basis: Richtlinie der Vorarlberger Landesregierung zur Förderung der Tierzucht und Viehwirtschaft

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company: Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme: EUR 0,60 million

Maximum aid intensity: 0,80 %

Date of implementation: —

Duration of scheme or individual aid award: 12 May 2011-31 December 2013

Objective of aid: Livestock sector (Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006), Technical support (Article 15 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006)

Sector(s) concerned: Animal production

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Amt der Vorarlberger Landesregierung |
| --- |
| Landhaus |
| 6901 Bregenz |
| ÖSTERREICH |

Amt der Vorarlberger Landesregierung

Landhaus

6901 Bregenz

ÖSTERREICH

Website: http://www.vorarlberg.at/tierzuchtrichtlinie

Other information: —

Aid No: SA.32784 (11/XA)

Member State: Romania

Region: România

Title of aid scheme or name of company receiving an individual aid: Acordarea unui ajutor de stat pentru ameliorarea raselor de animale

Legal basis: Hotărâre de Guvern nr. 207/9 martie 2011 pentru aprobarea normelor metodologice privind modul de acordare a ajutorului de stat pentru ameliorarea raselor de animale, publicată în Monitorul oficial nr. 206/24.3.2011

Ordonanța Guvernului nr. 14/2010 privind măsuri financiare pentru reglementarea ajutoarelor de stat acordate producătorilor agricoli, începând cu anul 2010, aprobată cu modificări și completări prin Legea nr. 74/2010, cu completările ulterioare

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or overall amount of individual aid granted to the company: Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme: RON 61,25 million

Maximum aid intensity: 100 %

Date of implementation: —

Duration of scheme or individual aid award: 12 May 2011-31 December 2013

Objective of aid: Livestock sector (Article 16 of Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006)

Sector(s) concerned: Animal production

Name and address of the granting authority:

| Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării Rurale |
| --- |
| Bd. Carol I nr. 24, sector 3 |
| București |
| ROMÂNIA |

Ministerul Agriculturii și Dezvoltării Rurale

Bd. Carol I nr. 24, sector 3

București

ROMÂNIA

Website: http://www.madr.ro/pages/arhiva_legislativa.php?offset=0&limit=20

Other information: —

---
#### STATE v. WILLIAM JESS REID.

(Filed 3 March, 1965.)

Criminal Law § 142—

The right of the State to appeal in criminal prosecutions is solely statutory, G.S. 15-179, and the State has no right to appeal from a judgment allowing a plea of former jeopardy or acquittal.

Appeal by the State from *Cam-pbell, J.,*October 1964 Criminal.Session of GASTON.

A bill of indictment returned at September 3, 1963 Criminal Session charged that defendant, on August 14, 1963, “did unlawfully, willfully, feloniously and of malice aforethought kill and murder Clarence P. Armstrong,” etc. The trial of defendant on said bill of indictment before Judge Froneberger and a jury at November 4, 1963 Criminal Session resulted in a verdict of not guilty.

A bill of indictment returned at March 31, 1964 Criminal Session charged defendant with the robbery of Clarence P. Armstrong by means of firearms on August 14, 1963, the felony defined in G.S: 14-87. At October 1964 Criminal Session, when called to trial on said robbery indictment, defendant pleaded former jeopardy (acquittal) as a bar to prosecution thereon. Thereupon, before selection of a jury, defendant offered in support of said plea of former jeopardy (acquittal) the Minutes of the court and a complete transcript of the proceedings and trial at said November 4, 1963 Criminal Session on said murder indictment.

Judge Campbell, being of the opinion “the charge of armed robbery is in fact but one transaction within the charge of murder in the first degree,” for which defendant was tried and acquitted at said November 4, 1963 Criminal Session, sustained “defendant's plea in bar of former jeopardy” and directed the entry of a verdict of not guilty as to said robbery indictment. Thereupon, the State, through the Solicitor of the Fourteenth Solicitorial District, gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court.

*Attorney General Bruton and Assistant Attorney General Bullock for the State.*

*Frank Patton Cooke and Joseph B. Roberts, III, for defendant ap-pellee.*

PeR Cueiam.

Our statute provides that an appeal to the Supreme Court or superior court may be taken by the State in the cases specified therein, and no other. G.S. 15-179. And this Court, upon consideration *826of this statute, held directly in *S. v. Wilson,*234 N.C. 552, 67 S.E. 2d 748, and in *S. v. Ferguson,*243 N.C. 766, 92 S.E. 2d 197, that the State has no right to appeal from a judgment allowing a plea of former jeopardy or acquittal. It is noted that the Attorney General states, with commendable frankness, that he is unable to distinguish the present case from those cited above. Hence, the State’s (purported) appeal •must be and is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2060

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY,

Petitioner,

versus

WILLIAM D. SMITH; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’

COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(No. 98-970-BLA)

Submitted: March 28, 2000 Decided: May 19, 2000

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan H. Walker, MASON, COWARDIN & MASON, Newport News, Virginia, for Petitioner. Robert E. Walsh, RUTTER, WALSH, MILLS &

RUTTER, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company seeks review of

the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order reversing the administrative law judge and granting temporary total disability benefits under the Long Shore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act. Our

review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based

upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Newport News

Shipbuilding v. Smith, No. 98-970-BLA (BRB Mar. 18 & June 24,

1999). We deny the motion for summary affirmance as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2011043EN.01000101.xml

| 11.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 43/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 43/1

---

Communication from the Commission upon full use of the ‘abatimento’ quota for 2010 (sorghum, Spain)

2011/C 43/01

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1262/2010 of 22 December 2010 provides for the prolongation of the tenders for the 2010 quota for import from third countries, for release for free circulation in Spain, of 300 000 tonnes of sorghum, until the quota is completely used and at the latest until 31 May 2011. On 18 January 2011, the quantity of the 2010 quota has been completely used.

---