alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2230 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the dollar limitation 

on the exclusion for employer-provided dependent care assistance. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Mr. MURPHY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the dollar limitation on the exclusion for employer-provided dependent care assistance. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Care Flex Spend5 ing Act of 2019’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION ON EXCLUSION 

7 FOR EMPLOYER-PROVIDED DEPENDENT 

8 CARE ASSISTANCE. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

10 129(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amendVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:44 Jul 27, 2019 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2230.IS S2230

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2230 IS

1 ed by striking ‘‘shall not exceed’’ and all that follows and 

2 inserting the following: ‘‘shall not exceed the greater of— 

3 ‘‘(i) $5,000, or 

4 ‘‘(ii) $10,000, reduced (but not below 

5 zero) by 5 cents for each dollar (or fraction 

6 thereof) by which the employee’s earned in7 come for the taxable year exceeds $50,000. 

8 In the case of a separate return by a married 

9 individual, the amount determined under the 

10 preceding sentence shall be reduced by one11 half.’’. 

12 (b) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—Paragraph (2) of sec13 tion 129(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

14 amended by adding at the end the following new subpara15 graph: 

16 ‘‘(D) INFLATION ADJUSTMENT.—In the 

17 case of any taxable year beginning in a calendar 

18 year after 2020, the $5,000 and $10,000 

19 amounts contained in subparagraph (A) shall 

20 each be increased by an amount equal to— 

21 ‘‘(i) such dollar amount, multiplied by 

22 ‘‘(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment de23 termined under section 1(f)(3) for the cal24 endar year in which the taxable year be25 gins, determined by substituting ‘calendar 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2230 IS

1 year 2019’ for ‘calendar year 2016’ in sub2 paragraph (A)(ii) thereof. 

3 Any increase determined under the preceding 

4 sentence shall be rounded to the nearest mul5 tiple of $50.’’. 

6 (c) EMPLOYER SAFE HARBOR FOR REPORTING.— 

7 The Secretary of the Treasury (or the Secretary’s dele8 gate) shall promulgate regulations or other guidance to 

9 assist an employer in determining, for purposes of section 

10 3401(a)(18) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the 

11 amount (if any) in excess of $5,000 which it is reasonable 

12 to believe an employee will be able to exclude under section 

13 129 of such Code. 

14 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

16 December 31, 2019. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       2,185,327
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,727,682
<ALLOWANCES>                                   437,157
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,324,898
<PP&E>                                       1,405,547
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,147,073
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,805,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,933,172
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,448
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,181,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,805,728
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,689,498
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,488,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,069,878)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,418,211)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,418,211)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)
        


</TABLE>
# C_2011303EN.01000901.xml

| 14.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/9

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 303/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 13.8.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 13.8.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | NEP/8ABDE. |
| Species | Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) |
| Zone | VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 870462 |

Date and time of closure

13.8.2011

Duration

13.8.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

NEP/8ABDE.

Species

Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus)

Nephrops norvegicus

Zone

VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

870462

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code), the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust (the “Trust”) does hereby certify, to its knowledge, that: 

TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019 (the “Form 10-Q”) of the Trust fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Trust as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

 
/s/ Ron E. HooperRon E. HooperSenior Vice President on behalf of Simmons Bank, not in its individual capacity but solely as the Trustee of Marine Petroleum Trust
Dated: November 14, 2019 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Trust and will be retained by the Trust and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated byreference into any filing of the Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. 
**
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2273 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to reauthorize the Appalachian 

Regional Commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 25, 2019 

Mrs. CAPITO (for herself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. MCCONNELL, and Mr. WICKER) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 40, United States Code, to reauthorize the 

Appalachian Regional Commission, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Appalachian Regional 

5 Commission Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. APPALACHIAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 14703 of title 40, United 

8 States Code, is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)— 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2273 IS

1 (A) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

2 the end; 

3 (B) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘through 

4 2020.’’ and inserting ‘‘through 2020; and’’; and 

5 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(6) $180,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 

7 through 2025.’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection (c)— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘$20,000,000’’; and 

11 (B) by striking ‘‘2020’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘2025’’. 

13 (b) TERMINATION.—Section 14704 of title 40, 

14 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘2020’’ and 

15 inserting ‘‘2025’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1 COMPANYS OFFICERS CERTIFICATE GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 6) PLC
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE The undersigned officer of Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 6) PLC, a public limited company
incorporated in England and Wales (the Issuer), hereby certifies on behalf of the Issuer and on
his own behalf for purposes of the $675,000,000 Class A Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes, the
$37,500,000 Class B Floating Rate Asset-Backed Notes and the $37,500,000 Class C Floating Rate
Asset-Backed Notes (together, the Notes), as follows: 1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the Issuer;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the Issuer; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of Notes for the period between January 1, 2004 and the end of
the Issuers fiscal year on December 31, 2004.
 Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the
Registration Statement related to the above-referenced issue of Notes. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name this 30th day of June, 2005. By:
    
    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName: Paul Gerard TurnerTitle: Director
The Honorable James Maxwell Moody, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1792

___________

Bobby Davis, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Cheyenne Industries, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: November 20, 1997

 Filed: November 28, 1997

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Bobby Davis brought this Title VII action, alleging that his former employer,

Cheyenne Industries, Inc., discharged him because of his race, African-American.

Following a bench trial, the district court found that Davis had failed to demonstrate 1

that Cheyenne&s proffered reason for terminating him was pretextual or that his

discharge was racially motivated. Davis appeals.
-2-

As Davis has failed to provide a transcript or to request one at government

expense, we cannot review the district court&s factual findings. See Van Treese v.

Blome, 7 F.3d 729, 729 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). We conclude that based on its

factual findings, the district court correctly entered judgment in favor of Cheyenne. See

St. Mary&s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502, 507-08 (1993); Harvey v. AnheuserBusch, Inc., 38 F.3d 968, 973 (8th Cir. 1994). 

The judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

OCT 31 2001

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD L. VAN WINKLE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

STATE OF WYOMING; JIM

GERINGER, individually and in his

official capacity as Governor of

Wyoming; THOMAS C. CAMPBELL,

individually and in his official

capacity as Carbon County Attorney;

JERRY COLSON, individually and in

his official capacity as Carbon County

Sheriff,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-8071

(D.C. No. 98-CV-160-J)

(D. Wyo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before HENRY , PORFILIO , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.
-2-

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff, a prisoner of the State of Washington, brought this civil rights

case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging the deprivation of his constitutional rights

by various officials of the State of Wyoming and Carbon County. The alleged

deprivations stem from plaintiff’s extradition from Washington to Wyoming to

face charges of incest. The district court granted summary judgment to

defendants, and plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

We review the district court’s grant of summary

judgment de novo, applying the same legal standard used

by the district court. Summary judgment is appropriate

“if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories,

and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if

any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any

material fact and that the moving party is entitled to

judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). 

When applying this standard, we view the evidence and

draw reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most

favorable to the nonmoving party. 

Simms v. Oklahoma ex rel Dep’t of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Servs. , 165

F.3d 1321, 1326 (10th Cir. 1999) (citations omitted).
-3-

Upon this review, we affirm the judgment of the district court for

substantially the same reasons as those contained in the order of that court dated

September 22, 2000.

The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of

Wyoming is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Robert H. Henry 

Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of National Bank of Greece S.A. ("National Bank of Greece") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
(the "Report"), Apostolos Tamvakakis, as CEO of National Bank of Greece, and Anthimos Thomopoulos, as CFO and COO, respectively, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



Dated
June 30, 2010

/s/ APOSTOLOS TAMVAKAKIS Apostolos Tamvakakis Chief Executive Officer


/s/ ANTHIMOS THOMOPOULOS Anthimos Thomopoulos Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operating Officer


The
above certificate is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

---



QuickLinks
# C_2011088EN.01000101.xml

| 19.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/1

---

Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

2011/C 88/01

| Document | Part | Date | Title |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| COM(2008) 853 | 1 | 12.12.2008 | Proposal for a Council Decision on the signature on behalf of the European Community and provisional application of certain provisions of a Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement between the European Community and its Member States and the Syrian Arab Republic |
| COM(2008) 853 | 2 | 12.12.2008 | Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of a Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement between the European Community and its Member States of the one part, and the Syrian Arab Republic, of the other part |

Document

Part

Date

Title

COM(2008) 853

1

12.12.2008

Proposal for a Council Decision on the signature on behalf of the European Community and provisional application of certain provisions of a Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement between the European Community and its Member States and the Syrian Arab Republic

COM(2008) 853

2

12.12.2008

Proposal for a Council Decision on the conclusion of a Euro-Mediterranean Association Agreement between the European Community and its Member States of the one part, and the Syrian Arab Republic, of the other part

These texts are available on EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### STATE v. LOYE

No. 199A82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 501.

Motion by defendant to dismiss the appeal allowed 21 September 1982.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000060150
<NAME> JOSEPH DRYER
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      187
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,551
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              565
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           400
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,354
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   259
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   313
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (54)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (54)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (54)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   $(.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   $(.01)
        

</TABLE>
### TEXAS COU RT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 3

- 00 635

- CV

Nance & Duncan, P.L.L.C., Joseph F. Duncan, and Glynn D. Nance , Appellants

v. Cox Newspapers, L.P. d/b/a Austin American

- Statesman

, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. 270452 , HONORABLE ORLINDA L. NARANJO , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Because appellants Nance & Duncan, P.L.L.C., Joseph F. Duncan, and Glynn D. Nance have failed to arrange for the timely filing of a clerk = s record and have failed to submit a status report regarding their appeal, we wi ll dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b),
(c). The Clerk of this Court filed appellants = notice of appeal on October 17, 2003. On December 3, 2003, the Clerk of this Court requested a response from the county clerk = s office of Travis County regarding the status of the clerk = s record. We received no response. By letter dated January 20,
2004, the Clerk of th

is Court requested from appellants a status report regarding this appeal by January 30 and informed the parties that a failure to timely respond to this request would result in dismissal of the appealfor want of prosecution. To date, appellants have fail ed to respond to the request. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution on our own motion. See id.
42.3(b), (c).

__________________________________________ Bea Ann Smith, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: February 20, 2004
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2213 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to repay the credit risk premiums 

paid with respect to certain railroad infrastructure loans after the obligations attached to such loans have been satisfied. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. BENNET) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to repay the 

credit risk premiums paid with respect to certain railroad 

infrastructure loans after the obligations attached to 

such loans have been satisfied. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Railroad Rehabilitation 

5 and Improvement Financing Equity Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2213 IS

1 SEC. 2. CREDIT RISK PREMIUMS. 

2 (a) REFUND.—Section 502(f) of the Railroad Revi3 talization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976 (45 U.S.C. 

4 822(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(5) REFUND OF PREMIUMS.—The Secretary 

6 shall repay the credit risk premium of each loan, 

7 with interest accrued thereon, not later than 60 days 

8 after the date on which all obligations attached to 

9 each such loan have been satisfied. For each loan for 

10 which obligations have already been satisfied, as of 

11 the date of enactment of the Railroad Rehabilitation 

12 and Improvement Financing Equity Act, the Sec13 retary shall repay the credit risk premium of each 

14 such loan, with interest accrued thereon, not later 

15 than 60 days after the date of the enactment of such 

16 Act.’’. 

17 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

18 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

19 necessary to pay the cost of any direct loan modification 

20 (as defined in section 502 of the Federal Credit Reform 

21 Act of 1990) to carry out section 502(f)(5) of the Railroad 

22 Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1976, as 

23 added by subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS