alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT10.3**

 

 

 

**STRAIGHT NOTE**

 

 

 
| $150,000 |   | South El Monte,  California |   | May 24, 2002 |
|----------|--------|-----------------------------|--------|--------------|

 

 

                For valuereceived, Lee Pharmaceuticals promises to pay Mark DiSalvo or order, at SouthEl Monte, California the sum of ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS, withinterest from May 24, 2002, on unpaid principal at the rate of thirty (30) percent per annum; principal is payable at maturity.  This note has a due date of July 24, 2002.  Interest shall be calculated on the basis ofthe unpaid principal balance daily, based on a 365-day year, actual day monthand payable monthly.  Principal andinterest shall be payable in lawful money of the United States.  If action were instituted on this note, Ipromise to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney’s fees.  This note is not secured.  The balloon payment on this note is to bepaid out of the proceeds from the sale of Astring-o-Sol®.

 

 

 

 

 
| MAY 15,2002  |   | RONALD G. LEE                            |   |
|--------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date         |   | Lee Pharmaceuticals - Ronald G. Lee      |
|         |   |                                     |
| MAY 15, 2002 |   | MICHAEL L. AGRESTI                       |   |
| Date         |   | Lee Pharmaceuticals - Michael L. Agresti |
|              |        |                                          |        |  |

 

 

----
#### STATE v. PECK

No. 145 PC.

Now No. 12 PA 82.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 302.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 12 January 1982.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

IVAN MALD A NADO , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 1 7

- 2661

[ July 25, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.8 5 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Ninet eenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; James W. McCann
, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 2011

- CF

- 002677

- A

.

Ivan Mald a nado , Wewahitchka

, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Matthew Steven Ocksrider, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

. Affirmed

. See Hart v. State
, ––– So. 3d

––– , 43 Fla. L. Weekly D970a, 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018) (en banc). As we did in Hart , we certify conflict with Cuevas v. State
, 241 So. 3d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Blount v. State , 238 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Mosier v. State

, 235 So. 3d 957 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); Alfaro v. State , 233 So. 3d 515, 516 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017); and Burrows v. State , 219 So. 3d 910, 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017).

C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH , JJ.
, concur. W ARNER , J. concurring with opinion.

W ARNER , J. concurring.

Although I adhere to my dissent in Hart v. State
, ––– So. 3d

––– , 43 Fla. L. Weekly D970a, 2018 WL 2049668 (Fla. 4th DCA May 2, 2018) (en banc), I recognize that Hart is now the law of this district until the certified question is answered by our supreme court.2 * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 31 2001 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD L. VAN WINKLE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. STATE OF WYOMING; JIM GERINGER, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of Wyoming; THOMAS C. CAMPBELL, individually and in his official capacity as Carbon County Attorney; JERRY COLSON, individually and in his official capacity as Carbon County Sheriff, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-8071 (D.C. No. 98-CV-160-J) (D. Wyo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before HENRY , PORFILIO , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.-2-

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). T he case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff, a prisoner of the State of Washington, b rought this civil rights case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging the deprivati on of his constitutional rights by various officials of the State of Wyoming and Ca rbon County. The alleged deprivations stem from plaintiff’s extradition fromWashington to Wyoming to face charges of incest. The district court granted summary judgment to defendants, and plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same legal standard used by the district court. Summary judgment is appropr iate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrog atories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavit s, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c ). When applying this standard, we view the evidence and draw reasonable inferences therefrom in the light m ost favorable to the nonmoving party. Simms v. Oklahoma ex rel Dep’t of Mental Health & Substance Abuse Servs. , 165 F.3d 1321, 1326 (10th Cir. 1999) (citations omitted ).-3-

Upon this review, we affirm the judgment of the dis trict court for substantially the same reasons as those contained i n the order of that court dated September 22, 2000. The judgment of the United States District Court fo r the District of Wyoming is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Robert H. Henry Circuit Judge
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, D. Michael Parker, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kewaunee Scientific Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 15, 2005 

 

/s/ D. Michael Parker

D. Michael Parker

Senior Vice President, Finance and

Chief Financial Officer
# C_2011307EN.01000501.xml

| 19.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/5

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 307/04

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 13.8.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 13.8.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SRX/89-C. |
| Species | Skates and rays (Rajidae) |
| Zone | EU waters of VIII and IX |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 870462 |

Date and time of closure

13.8.2011

Duration

13.8.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

SRX/89-C.

Species

Skates and rays (Rajidae)

Rajidae

Zone

EU waters of VIII and IX

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

870462

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2011351EN.01003201.xml

| 2.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/32

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 351/08

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 11.11.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 11.11.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | The Netherlands |
| Stock or Group of stocks | ANF/07. |
| Species | Anglerfish (Lophiidae) |
| Zone | VII |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

11.11.2011

Duration

11.11.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

The Netherlands

Stock or Group of stocks

ANF/07.

Species

Anglerfish (Lophiidae)

Lophiidae

Zone

VII

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
| **EXHIBIT 32** 
 
			     Harry Lee Waterfield II and Raymond L. Carr, being the			President and Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, respectively,			of Kentucky Investors, Inc., hereby certify as of this 10th day of			May, 2007, that the Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 31, 2007			fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of			the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information			contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material			respects, the financial condition and results of operations of			Kentucky Investors, Inc.
 
** **
 
**KENTUCKY INVESTORS, INC.**
 
 
 
BY:  /s/Harry Lee Waterfield II
 
Harry Lee Waterfield II
DATE: May 10, 2007
President
 
 
 
BY:  /s/Raymond L. Carr
 
Raymond L. Carr
DATE: May 10, 2007
Vice President - Chief Financial Officer
  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### STATE v. BROOKS

No. 116 PC

Case below: 49 NC App 14

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 27 January 1981. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 27 January 1981.
. . . . :
-...:..a OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

### county clerkhe8 ~cotrtrel of the pep of &ha County **ACtornay, ha**  **in the**  **urdar the**  **Ala, V&C** **rlrOUl% bald**  **Oat** 

### the amwant 

### tithe vamaativvue&to bhe u6louat

therl#ot,

aa% report it. 

### OS lIolwSB)

mat 

### be msl¶a

EhrQlirdh

tha
Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03479-AKH Document 14 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Training and Career Development Subcommittee, November 14, 2007, 9 a.m. to November 16, 2007, 5 p.m., Double Tree Hotel & Executive Meeting Center, 8120 Wisconsin Ave., Bethesda, MD 20814 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 17, 2007, Volume 72, # 179.                

The date of the meeting was changed to November 13-16, 2007. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: October 22, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5309 Filed 10-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2394

LT Case No. 2016-302546-CFDB

_____________________________

JOHNNIE D. LLOYD,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Johnnie D. Lloyd, Carrabelle, pro se.

No Appearance for Respondent.

October 10, 2023

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

MAKAR, HARRIS, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
Case 7:07-cv-03544-KMK-LMS Document 8 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03544-KMK-LMS Document 8 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03544-KMK-LMS Document 8 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03544-KMK-LMS Document 8 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03544-KMK-LMS Document 8 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 7:07-cv-03544-KMK-LMS Document 8 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 6 of 6
Presidential Documents

60527 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 205 

Wednesday, October 24, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8192 of October 19, 2007 

National Character Counts Week, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

The greatness of a nation is measured not by power or wealth but by 

the character of its people. During National Character Counts Week, we 

underscore our dedication to promoting values for our young people and 

encourage all Americans to demonstrate good character. 

As America’s youth strive to become responsible adults, they carry with 

them the values and traditions they were taught as children. At home, 

parents and families can teach universal values such as respect, tolerance, 

self-restraint, fairness, and compassion. In the community, we all can set 

good examples and demonstrate the virtues of leadership, patriotism, and 

responsible citizenship. The members of our Armed Forces demonstrate 

the strength of America’s character by answering the call of service to 

our Nation. 

Through the Helping America’s Youth initiative, caring adults are connected 

with at-risk youth so that they have a mentor and an example as they 

navigate the challenges young people face. By working together, we can 

give children the skill and habits they need to reach their full potential. 

During National Character Counts Week and throughout the year, I urge 

all citizens to support the character development of our youth and make 

a difference in the lives of others. One way for all Americans to add 

to the character of our country is to volunteer to help a neighbor in need, 

and more information can be found at volunteer.gov. I encourage every 

American to serve a cause greater than themselves and set a positive example 

in their community. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim October 21 through 

October 27, 2007, as National Character Counts Week. I call upon public 

officials, educators, librarians, parents, students, and all Americans to observe 

this week with appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs. 


yshivers on PROD1PC62 with MISCELLANEOUS
60528 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 24, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this nineteenth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–5297 

Filed 10–23–07; 8:50 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


yshivers on PROD1PC62 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-31117 Summary Calendar

DANIEL H. JACKSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

SHIELD COAT, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-1949-T)

May 18, 1998

Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Daniel H. Jackson ("Jackson") sued his former employer, Shield

Coat, Inc., alleging age and disability discrimination in the work

place in violation of the Age Discrimination and Employment Act of

196 7 as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. ("ADEA"), and the2

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.

("ADA"). Jackson also claimed intentional infliction of emotional

distress. After comprehensive discovery, Shield Coat moved for

summary judgment and the district court granted that motion.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the record excerpts and

relevant portions of the summary judgment record itself. For the

reasons stated by the district court in its Order and Reasons filed

under date of September 17, 1997, we are persuaded that the Final

Judgment against Jackson entered under date of September 17, 1997,

should be, and the same is hereby, AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Z-Tel Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ D. Gregory Smith
-------------------------------------
D. Gregory Smith
March 30, 2004

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Z-Tel
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by the Z-Tel Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### LEVITCH v. LEVITCH

No. 47 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 56.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 1 November 1977.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 E0 03 4

. DREW WESTEN v . NANCY LAW LER; LAW LER, GREEN, PRI NZ

. Up o n co ns i derat i o n o f t h e APPELLANT’ S Em erg en cy M o t i o n fo r Req u es t fo r Ex t en s io n fo r Ap p li cat i o n fo r Di s cret i o n ary Ap p eal i n t h e ab o v e-s ty l ed cas e, i t i s

o rd ered t h at t h e m o ti o n i s h ereb y DENIED p u rs u an t t o Co u rt Ru l e 3 1 (i ).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i t n e s s m y s ig n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## March 10, 2020

03/10/2020