alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

AMENDMENT OF § 81.505 OF THE 

PENNSYLVANIA INTEREST ON 

LAWYERS TRUST ACCOUNT 

REGULATIONS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 134

DISCIPLINARY RULES

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2015, IT IS ORDERED pursuant to Article V, 

Section 10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Section 81.505 of the Pennsylvania 

Interest on Lawyers Trust Account Regulations is hereby amended as attached hereto. The 

Form for Pro Hac Vice Admission shall be modified to reflect the increase in the admission 

fee.

To the extent that notice of the proposed amendment would be required by 

Pa.R.J.A. No. 103 or otherwise, the immediate amendment of Section 81.505 is required in 

the interest of justice and efficient administration.

This ORDER shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall 

be effective on June 12, 2015.

Additions are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions are shown in bold and brackets.
#### RENT-A-CAR CO. v. LYNCH, SEC. OF REVENUE

No. 97 PC.

No. 55 (Fall Term)

Case below: 39 N.C. App. 709.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 5 June 1979.
#### STATE v. PEVIA

No. 316P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 384.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 13 July 1982.
# C_2011180EN.01002401.xml

| 21.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/24

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 180/14

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 14.1.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 14.1.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Other Member States (AMS quota) (2), at the initiative of Spain |
| Stock or Group of stocks | PRA/N3L. |
| Species | Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis) |
| Zone | NAFO 3L |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 477973 |

Date and time of closure

14.1.2011

Duration

14.1.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Other Member States (AMS quota) (2), at the initiative of Spain

2

Stock or Group of stocks

PRA/N3L.

Species

Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis)

(Pandalus borealis)

Zone

NAFO 3L

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

477973

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

(2)  All Member States except Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and with the exception of Member States which have obtained an individual quota by means of a transfer or an exchange.

2

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gregory J. Divis, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: December 8, 2011 |  | /s/     Gregory J.
Divis             
|                       |  | Gregory J. Divis                     
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.



89
CERTIFICATION OF
                      PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, the undersigned, Derek L. Caldwell, who is
the President and Chief Executive Officer of Lincoln International Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2005, (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Sec.13(a) or Sec.15(d) as applicable, of the Securities
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ DEREK L. CALDWELL
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Derek L. Caldwell
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    Date:  July 22, 2005
#### STATE v. VEGA

No. 106 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 326.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1979. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 5 June 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 19 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03238-AKH Document 19 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 208 (Monday, October 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61117-61118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5343]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket No. DoD-2007-OS-0032]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB for clearance, the 
following proposal for collection of information under the provisions 
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Dates: Consideration will be given to all comments received by 
November 28, 2007.
    Title, Form, and OMB Number: Repatriation Automated Accounting and 
Reporting System: DD Form 2585; OMB Control Number 0704-0334.
    Type of Request: Extension.
    Number of Respondents: 5,000.
    Responses per Respondent: 1.
    Annual Responses: 5,000.
    Average Burden per Response: 20 minutes.
    Annual Burden Hours: 1,667.
    Needs and Uses: This information collection is necessary for 
personnel accountability of all evacuees, regardless of nationality, 
who are processed through designated Repatriation Centers throughout 
the United States. The information obtained from the DD Form 2585 is 
entered into an automated system; a series of reports is accessible to 
DoD Components, Federal and State agencies and Red Cross, as required.
    Affected Public: Individuals or households; Federal government; 
State, local or tribal government.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Respondents Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
    OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Hillary Jaffe.
    Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information 
collection should be sent to Ms. Jaffe at the Office of Management and 
Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503.
    You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and 
title, by the following method:
    <bullet> Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency 
name, docket number and title for the Federal Register document. The 
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the 
public is to make these submissions available for public

[[Page 61118]]

viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are 
received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact 
information.
    DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Patricia Toppings.
    Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal 
should be sent to Ms. Toppings at WHS/ESD/Information Management 
Division, 1777 North Kent Street, RPN, Suite 11000, Arlington, VA 
22209-2133.

    Dated: October 22, 2007.
Patricia L. Toppings,
Alternate OSD Federal Register, Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 07-5343 Filed 10-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KEVIN ANTHONY MOORE,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv38/RH/EMT

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER

Plaintiff, a non-prisoner proceeding pro se, commenced this action by filing a civil rights

complaint, which the court construed as brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and Bivens v. Six

Unknown Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S. Ct. 1999, 29 L. Ed. 2d 619

(1971). This matter is now before the court on Plaintiff’s renewed motion for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis (Doc. 9).1

 Upon review of Plaintiff’s renewed application to proceed in forma pauperis, which Plaintiff

signed under penalty of perjury, the court concludes the application should be denied. Plaintiff

indicates that his monthly income totals approximately $1,680.00, as he receives $210.00 per week

from A.F.D.C.—or approximately $840.00 per month—and, apparently, $840.00 per month in

unemployment benefits. Plaintiff claims debts totaling $1005.00, which leaves approximately

$675.00 per month available in disposable income. Additionally, Plaintiff states that he owns an

unencumbered vehicle worth $1500.00.2

 Therefore, it affirmatively appears that leave to proceed

1

 Plaintiff has also filed an amended complaint (Doc. 8), and a response to the court’s March 31, 2010, order

(Doc. 10). The court will not address either of these filings until Plaintiff has paid the filing fee in this case.

2

 Plaintiff also apparently holds an ownership interest in real property (currently in probate) which is valued

at $100,000.00, with a mortgage of $92,000.00. 
Page 2 of 2

in forma pauperis should be denied. In order to proceed with this case, Plaintiff will be required to

pay the full filing fee of $350.00. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s renewed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 9), is

DENIED. Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee within THIRTY (30) DAYS of the date of docketing

of this order.

2. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this

case for failure to comply with an order of the court. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of May 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 5:10cv38/RH/EMT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                              199,458 
<SECURITIES>                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                    20,529,704
<ALLOWANCES>                        823,818
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 26,592,444
<PP&E>                          119,260,975
<DEPRECIATION>                   59,501,077
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  111,079,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            14,989,563
<BONDS>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<COMMON>                             66,734
<OTHER-SE>                       31,313,928
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    111,079,315
<SALES>                          31,365,152
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 31,365,152
<CGS>                            21,680,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    21,680,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  5,215,129
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  510,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   3,959,035
<INCOME-TAX>                      1,603,398
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               2,355,637
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                      2,355,637
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.41
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS LEGEND  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COYOTE NETWORKS SYSTEMS, INC. AS
OF AND FOR THE  QUARTER  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1999,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 613
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         3462
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (137)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     12110
<PP&E>                                                5900
<DEPRECIATION>                                       (1436)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       28080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                16455
<BONDS>                                               1464
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                           7468
<COMMON>                                             14495
<OTHER-SE>                                          (13817)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         28080
<SALES>                                               2858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      2858
<CGS>                                                 2578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         2578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      1954
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (2070)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (2070)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       (2972)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (5042)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.39)


</TABLE>
#### E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO. v. MOORE

No. 348P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 84.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 13 July 1982.
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 120-2 Filed 08/03/10 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 120-2 Filed 08/03/10 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 120-2 Filed 08/03/10 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 120-2 Filed 08/03/10 Page 4 of 4
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RANDY DEAN SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00061-MP-WCS

KENNETH HOSFORD, EILEEN A HUMPHREY, PETE J, G PEZESHKIAN, KOA SHUN

WU, CUONG Q VU,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Report and Recommendation by the Magistrate Judge,

Doc. 7. In an order filed April 26, 2010, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint by

May 24, 2010. Though Plaintiff was specifically warned that failure to comply could lead to the

dismissal of his case, he did not file the amended complaint. Then, in a June 9, 2010 order, the

Magistrate Judge recommended the case be dismissed, affording Plaintiff another fourteen (14)

days to correct his deficiencies. Plaintiff has not responded, and the time for doing so has now

passed. Finding no plain error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 7, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein. 

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of July, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Exhibit
      32(a)








This
      Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
      subject to the liability of that section. This Certification shall not be
      incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document
      pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in such
      filing.








Certification
      Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of
      Title
      18 of the United States Code








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of the Companies (as defined below) on
      Form
      10-Q (the “Reports”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael G. Morris,
      the chief executive officer of





Kentucky
      Power Company





(the
      “Companies”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i)
      the Reports fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the
      Reports fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Companies.








/s/
      Michael G. Morris


Michael
      G. Morris


Chief
      Executive Officer








May
      4,
      2007








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
      Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 12 Filed 12/10/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 12 Filed 12/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      16,971,920
<SECURITIES>                                13,907,735
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,723,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                   550,000
<INVENTORY>                                    181,140
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,922,946
<PP&E>                                      19,651,675
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,136,693
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              66,380,503
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,498,664
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,091
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,591,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                66,380,503
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            49,612,885
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,321,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,175,767
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                80,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             179,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,952,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,169,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,783,101
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,783,101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LATRELL D. CARROLL,

Movant,

vs. Case No. 4:10mc29-RH/WCS

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT 

OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL,

Respondent.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pending is a Motion to Challenge Government's Access to Financial Records. 

Doc. 1. The motion is filed pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 3410. 

Respondent has filed a limited response arguing that the Motion was not timely

filed as required by § 3410(a). Doc. 4. Movant was provided an opportunity to file a

response, doc. 6, but has not done so. 

Movant has not contested Respondent's assertion that the subpoena was

personally served upon her on March 3, 2010. This motion was not filed until March 17,

2010, beyond the 10 days for filing a motion to quash this subpoena as set forth in §
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:10mc29-RH/WCS

3410(a) when there is personal service. This time limit is to be strictly construed. 

Siegfried v. Inspector General of U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, 163 F.Supp.2d 170, 173

(E.D. N.Y. 2001). 

The court is not to order a response from the Government until it has been

determined that Movant has complied with § 3410(a). 12 U.S.C. § 3410(b). It now is

determined that the motion was not timely filed.

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court DISMISS this motion, doc. 1,

as untimely filed pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 3410(a).

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on April 29, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14

days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections

limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.
#### STATE v. BOYETTE

No. 95 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 252.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 January 1972.