alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2315 

AN ACT 

To amend section 4712 of title 41, United States Code, 

to clarify the inclusion of subcontractors and subgrantees 

for whistleblower protection. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2315 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Whistleblower Act of 

3 2019’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROTECTION AGAINST REPRISAL FOR FEDERAL 

5 SUBGRANTEE EMPLOYEES. 

6 Section 4712 of title 41, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a)(2)(G), by striking ‘‘or 

9 grantee’’ and inserting ‘‘grantee, or subgrantee’’; 

10 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘contractor or 

11 grantee’’ and inserting ‘‘contractor, subcontractor, 

12 grantee, or subgrantee’’; 

13 (3) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘contractor 

14 or grantee’’ each place it appears and inserting 

15 ‘‘contractor, subcontractor, grantee, or subgrantee’’; 

16 and 

17 (4) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘and grant18 ees’’ and inserting ‘‘grantees, and subgrantees’’. 

Passed the Senate December 9, 2020. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

116TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2315 

AN ACT 

To amend section 4712 of title 41, United States 

and subgrantees for whistleblower protection. Code, to clarify the inclusion of subcontractors
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Presidential Documents 56875 

Presidential Determination No. 2007–35 of September 28, 2007 

Waiver of Limitation on Obligation and Expenditure of 

$1,051.6 Million in Fiscal Year 2007 Economic Support 

Funds for Iraq 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution 

and the laws of the United States, including section 1314(c)(2) of the U.S. 

Troop Readiness, Veterans’ Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability 

Appropriations Act, 2007 (Public Law 110–28 ) (the ‘‘Act’’), I hereby waive 

the requirements of section 1314(c)(1) for $1,051.6 million of Fiscal Year 

2007 Economic Support Funds for Iraq and direct you to submit to the 

Congress this determination along with the certification in accordance with 

section 1314(c)(2) of the Act. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULES
56876 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 192 / Thursday, October 4, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

You are authorized and directed to publish this determination in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, September 28, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–4954 

Filed 10–3–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with RULESGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Jose Cortez, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (John T. Hecht, J.), rendered May 17, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders v California</i> (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (<i>see id.</i>; <i>Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.]</i>, 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; <i>People v Paige</i>, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; <i>cf. People v Gonzalez</i>, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).</p><p>Aliotta, J.P., Pesce and Solomon, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: April 07, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 60376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5233]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Interest Rate on Overdue Debts

    Section 30.13 of the Department of Health and Human Services' 
claims collection regulations (45 CFR Part 30) provides that the 
Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest as fixed by the 
Secretary of the Treasury after taking into consideration private 
consumer rates of interest prevailing on the date that HHS becomes 
entitled to recovery. The rate generally cannot be lower than the 
Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable 
rate determined from the ``Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with 
Range of Maturities.'' This rate may be revised quarterly by the 
Secretary of the Treasury and shall be published quarterly by the 
Department of Health and Human Services in the Federal Register.
    The Secretary of the Treasury has certified a rate of 12\1/2\ 
percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. This interest rate 
will remain in effect until such time as the Secretary of the Treasury 
notifies HHS of any change.

    Dated: October 17, 2007.
Molly P. Dawson,
Director, Office of Financial Policy and Reporting.
[FR Doc. 07-5233 Filed 10-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
```
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 14

               CODE OF ETHICS FOR SENIOR OFFICERS OF SULPHCO, INC.


Scope and Applicability

         This Code of Ethics for Senior Officers of SulphCo, Inc. (the
"COMPANY"), referred to herein as the "CODE OF ETHICS," contains ethical
guidelines for its principal executive officer, principal financial officer,
principal accounting officer or controller and persons performing similar
functions (such persons are collectively referred to as "SENIOR OFFICERS") and
is intended to comply with applicable provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and rules promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("SEC"). The provisions contained in this Code of Ethics are intended
to supplement other policies, practices and procedures as are adopted from time
to time by the Company from time to time which are applicable to all employees
or to management level and supervisory employees.

Standards of Conduct

         The honesty and integrity of senior officers is fundamental to the
reputation and success of the Company. Accordingly, each senior officer shall,
in the performance of duties for the Company, to the best of the officer's
knowledge and ability:

     o   Act with honesty and integrity, including the ethical handling of any
         actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and
         professional relationships;

     o   Disclose to the Audit Committee any material transaction or
         relationship that could reasonably be expected to give rise to a
         personal conflict of interest;

     o   Provide, or cause to be provided, full, fair, accurate, timely and
         understandable disclosure in reports and documents that the Company
         files with, or submits to, the SEC and in other public communications
         made by the Company;

     o   Comply with all applicable government laws, rules and regulations; and

     o   Promptly report any violations of this Code of Ethics to the Audit
         Committee, and promote the prompt reporting by others of violations of
         the Company's Code Of Business Conduct to the Audit Committee.

Enforcement of Violations and Waivers

         The Audit Committee shall determine, or designate appropriate persons
to determine, remedial actions to be taken in the event of a violation of the
Code of Ethics. Such actions shall be reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing
and promote accountability for adherence to the Code of Ethics. The Audit
Committee has full and discretionary authority to approve any amendment to or
waiver from this Code of Ethics for senior officers; any such amendment or
waiver shall be promptly disclosed as required by applicable law or regulation.
N0.01-15-00367-CR COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT

REYNALDO ZAMORA, 

### Appellant

VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

### Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT 

### HAYS COUNTY, TEXAS TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. 87-0140
FIRST MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WinCH TO FILE STATE'S BRIEF

Brian Erskine 

### Criminal DistrictAttorney 712 South Stagecoach Trail, Suite 2057 San Marcos, Texas 78666 State Bar No. 24074182 

### Attorney for the State ofTexas 

### brian.erskine@co.hays.tx.us
Page 1 ACCEPTED 01-15-00367-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/28/2015 3:48:44 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKTO THE HONORABLE JUSTICE OFTHE FIRST COURT OFAPPEALS: The State files this First Motion for Extension ofTime in Which to File State's 

### Brief, and in support states: L The State's current deadline for filing its briefis January 6,2016. 2. This is the State's first Motion for Extension ofTime in which to file its brief 

### 3. The State respectfully requests an extension ofapproximately thirty days, until February 5,2016 in which to file its brief 

### 4. This extension is not being sought to cause undue delay, but to seek justice.

Respectfully submitted,

Brian Erskine 

### Asst. Criminal DistrictAttorney P.O. Box 12548 

### Austin, Texas 78711-2548 State BarNo.24074182 

### Attorney for the State ofTexas

Page 2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### I certify that a true copyofthe foregoing brief has beenemail-delivered to: 

### AlexanderL. Calhounviaemail: alcalhoun@earthlink.net on this the 28th day of December, 2015.



### fBrian Erskine Asst. Criminal District Attorney

Page 3
#### STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. 92 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. 233.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 March 1972.
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 20 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ali Jenab, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of SourceForge, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the
fiscal year ended July 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of SourceForge,
Inc.

|Date: October 17,
      2007 | By:    | /s/ ALI JENAB                              
|---------------------------- | ------ | -------------------------------------------
|                             | Name:  | Ali Jenab                                  
|                             | Title: | Chief
      Executive Officer and President

---
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Becky Corigliano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:   May 13, 2005





By   /s/ Becky Corigliano



Becky Corigliano, Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60052-60053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5215]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Fourteenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 207/Airport Security 
Access Control Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 207 Meeting, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 207, Airport Security Access Control 
Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 16, 2007 from 9:30 a.m.-4 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., Conference Rooms, 
1828 L Street, NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 207 meeting. The agenda will 
include:

[[Page 60053]]

    <bullet> November 16:
    <bullet> Opening Plenary Session (Welcome, Introductions, and 
Administrative Remarks).
    <bullet> Review of Meeting Summary.
    <bullet> Review of Workgroup Leaders Meetings.
    <bullet> Workgroup Reports.
    <bullet> Workgroup 2: Introduction.
    <bullet> Workgroup 3: Local Identity Management System.
    <bullet> Workgroup 4: Physical Access Control.
    <bullet> Workgroup 5: Intrusion Detection Systems.
    <bullet> Workgroup 6: Video Systems.
    <bullet> Workgroup 7: Security Operating Center.
    <bullet> Workgroup 8: Communications Infrastructure.
    <bullet> Workgroup 9: General Considerations.
    <bullet> Workgroup 10: Appendices.
    <bullet> Closing Plenary Session (Other Business, Establish Agenda, 
Date and Place of Following Meetings).
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 15, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-5215 Filed 10-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
#### STATE v. BROOKS & MERCER

No. 137P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 256.

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 May 1982.
#### STATE v. BROADNAX

No. 166 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 192.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 July 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03579-LTS-MHD Document 11-2 Filed 08/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011337EN.01000701.xml

| 18.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/7

---

Notice concerning a request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC

Request from a contracting entity

2011/C 337/06

On 26 October 2011, the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1). The first working day following receipt of the request was 27 October 2011.

1

This request, from the Bundesverband der Energie- und Wasserwirtschaft e.V. (Federal Association of the Energy and Water Industry) on behalf of the contracting entities in that sector, concerns electricity production and wholesale in Germany.

Article 30 provides that the Directive does not apply where the activity in question is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not limited. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

The Commission has a period of three months, as from the working day referred to above, within which to take a decision on this request. The period therefore ends on 27 January 2012. This period may be extended by three months. Notice of any such extension must be published.

Pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 30(6), further requests concerning electricity production and wholesale in Germany, submitted before the period opened for this request expires, will not be considered as new procedures and will be dealt with as part of this request.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### RIDDICK v. WHITAKER

No. 14 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 416.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 April 1972.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

REGIONS BANK,

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No. 3:10cv100/LAC/EMT

MOTOR YACHT ROYAL INDULGENCE,

et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

This cause is before the court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Interlocutory Sale of Vessel and

Memorandum in Support (Doc. 35). Defendants David E. Gaudin and Danny L. McCray have

responded in opposition to the motion (Docs. 40, 41). Before the court rules on this matter, Plaintiff

shall be required to file a reply to the Defendants’ responses.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Plaintiff shall file a reply to the Defendant’ responses within TEN (10) DAYS from the

docketing date of this order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of September 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

 ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00100-LC-EMT Document 42 Filed 09/22/10 Page 1 of 1
/••

Court of Criminal Appeals f/V\L"£ /" lvO~'(/b>

Clerk Abel Acosta

P.O.Box 12308

Austen,Texas 78711-2308 April 29,2015

RE: Cover letter |_U

Mr. Acosta Clerk;

Please fined enclosed letter to you and copy of letter.

Please send back copy of letter to you with file mark for my recoreds

I thankyou for your time and help. You can send file mark letter and

your respon in the s.a.s.e. provided by me.

Thank you.

Cx^. 71. >- « JSu' Tun5• Guy B. Muxiseh II SuiJuris.

TDCJ#17620O2

Ferguson Unit

12120 Savage Drive

Midway,Texas 75852

COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS

MAY 041815

^fo@3Acosta,Gtertc
/

Court of Criminal Appeals

Clerk Abel Acosta.

P.O.Box 12308

Austin,Texas April 29,2015

RE: Need to know ware record stands,Cause N0.96-CR-170

Mr.Acost Clerk;

M^ name is Guy B.Munschll ,TDCJ#1762002. And <$: this time. On

the Jim Ferguson Unit. Texas Prison. I am now helping Mr.Ismael Diaz,

cause No.96-CR-170. Wit||ihis case. I Mr.Munsch II who is a layman at law

Am tring to help him. Going over Mr.Diaz file I can see lots of letters

wrote to the County court clerk of Starr County Eloy R. Garcia, with

no responce. And I see he has wate this Court and filed moot letter's

and motions, (moot: to raise or bring forword Lapoint or question]

for discussion). At this time the Brady motion art.40.001. need to be

amend. And Resubmitted. With all new evidance. So we are asking to with

draw, to beable to Resubmit. But in doing this I need to know ware the

record stan! And if there is an open docket.

Thankyou. < . «r • •

Guy B. Munsch II,SuiJuris

TDCJ#1762002

Jim Ferguson Unit Cl-26

12120 Savage Drive

Midway,Texas 75852
Court of Criminal Appeals

Clerk Abel Acosta.

P.O.Box 12308 , „ , Austin,Texas April 29,2015 ^T.*?'jR*«T"itt">J!5»* •^W-V-'^'WPT*'*»'

;»;;'-i. \ .^- rt"> ',

'»Jr "". ••' -"•*l -r^*i>»5^t»rt«"'"nV1*"«*''"'*V«v-'''r">

RE: Need to know ware record stands,Cause N0.96-CR-170

Mr.Acost Clerk}

Wyi name is Guy B.MunschII,TDCJ#1762002.And &£ this time. On

the Jim Ferguson Unit. Texas Prison. I am now helping Mr.Ismael Diaz,

cause No.96-CR-.170. withhhis case. I Mr.Munsch II who is a layman at law

Am tring to;help him. Going over Mr.Diaz file I can see lots of letters

:wrote ^a the County court clerk of Starr Coupty Elpy R. Garcia, with

no responce. And I see he has wate this Court and filed moot letter's

and motions, (moot: to raise or bring forword [apoint or question]

,.-„ for discussion). At this time the Brady motion art.40.001. need to be

amend. And Resubmitted. With all new evidance. So we are askinr a with

draw,, to beable to Resubmit. But in doing this I need to know ware the

record stani And if there is an open docket. *•*-• -••••••"-•*•- ••-•.'• •"•' s-::-:';V • F ••-• ••••< ...•:••.; -,:;.•-:';•. ^ v,^r..v •,-••,..••;.

•••; Thankyou.--' .^r;3

Guy B. Munsch II,SuiJuris

TDCJ#1762002

Jim Ferguson Unit Cl-26

12120 Savage Drive

Midway,Texas 75852

Hk*# -?;. • % ^a.ff^.-v:- ../,. •«•• $;•< ;. ;•;.,;is-:-=r:: ' «iv»;j; .

? ',-.;_ v\
#### William F. Feeck, as Administrator of the Estate of William B. Bartholomew, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*The New York Central Railroad Company, Respondent.

*Feeck*v. *N. Y. Central B. B. Co.,*180 App. Div. 253, affirmed.

(Argued October 4, 1918;

decided October 22, 1918.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered Deqember 3, 1917, unanimously affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term. Plaintiff’s intestate, an employee of the Delaware and Hudson Company, was struck by an engine of the defendant railroad on one of its tracks at the Schenectady station and killed. The said station was used jointly by the two railroads but each owned and maintained its separate tracks. The trial court dismissed the complaint on the ground that the intestate was a trespasser on defendant’s tracks and that it owed him no duty of special care.

. *Walter A. Fullerton, James A. Leary*and *John B. Parker*for appellant.

*William L. Visscher*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Collin, Cuddeback, Hogan, McLaughlin and Crane, JJ.