alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6268

ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, a/k/a Eddie Makdessi,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

BRYAN WATSON, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior 

District Judge. (3:09-cv-00214-RLW)

Submitted: January 28, 2011 Decided: March 9, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi, Appellant Pro Se. Leah A. Darron, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Makdessi has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability 

and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Makdessi’s motions for 

transcripts and records at Government expense; to preserve his 

constitutional right to appeal; to compel the prison to grant 
3

access to the law library; and for a protective order. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

RUBEN C. FERNANDEZ-OLIVARES,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv55/RS-MD

PMI EMPLOYEE LEASING, INC., et al,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 17). 

No objections have been filed.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed because of Plaintiff’s failure to timely achieve

service of process.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

ORDERED on November 30, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 17, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 58757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-55513]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 740


License Exceptions

CFR Correction

    In Title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations, revised as of 
January 1, 2007, on page 282, in Supplement No. 1 To Part 740--Country 
Groups, in the table Country Group D, for the entry ``Korea, North,'' 
the table is corrected by adding an X under the second column [D: 1] 
National Security.

[FR Doc. 07-55513 Filed 10-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
#### BOWES v. BOWES

No. 121 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 586.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 January 1980.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00485-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.P., a Child

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-0449-CV-A

Honorable Thomas Nathaniel Stuckey, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is DENIED. 

We order that no costs be assessed against appellant Mother because she is indigent.

SIGNED November 28, 2018.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1029

ARTHUR L. BOWMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARVIN T. RUNYON, JR., Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service Agency, Washington, DC,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-94-3265-6-20AK)

Submitted: August 15, 1996 Decided: August 20, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur L. Bowman, Appellant Pro Se. Janet E. Smith, UNITED STATES

POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C.; Lee Ellis Berlinsky, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant noted this appeal outside the sixty-day appeal

period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an

extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day

period provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to

relief under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established

by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v.

Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting

United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district

court entered its order on October 25, 1995; Appellant's notice of

appeal was filed on January 2, 1996. Appellant's failure to note a

timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives

this court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

............................................................ X 

ALION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CORP. : 

: ECF CASE 

Petitioner, 

: Civil Action No.: 07-cv-3547 (SHS)(FM) 

-againstBOMBARDIER, INC., 

: VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL 

Respondent. ............................................................ X 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(l), Petitioner Alion Science and Technology Corporation hereby voluntarily 

dismisses the petition filed in the above-named matter without prejudice. 

Dated: New York, New York 

June 14,2007 

Venable LLP / 

By: 

Gregory W. Gilliam (GG-2857) 

The Chrysler Building 

405 Lexington Avenue, 56th Floor 

New York, NY 10 174 

Telephone (2 12) 307-5500 

Facsimile (212) 307-5598 

Attorneys for Petitioner 

Alion Science & Technology 

Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 8 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 3
OF COUNSEL: 

J. Scott Hommer 

Kristen E. Burgers 

Venable LLP 

801 0 Towers Crescent Drive 

Suite 300 

Vienna, VA 22 1 82 

Telephone: (703) 76 1 - 1600 

Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 8 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of Petitioner's Voluntary Dismissal was duly served 

via first-class mail on June 14, 2007, addressed as follows, upon: 

Thomas W. Tobin, Esq. 

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP 

150 East 42nd Street 

New York, NY 10017-5639 

,A' L~A[AN 

Gre ory W. Gilliam 

Counsel for 

Alion Science and Technology Corp. 

Case 1:07-cv-03547-SHS Document 8 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TECHSHELL INC., 

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-154/RS-MD

HARDCANDY CASES, LLC, 

ET AL.

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Defendants HardCandy Cases, LLC, and XGear, LLC, shall file a response to 

Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion to Withdraw Consent to the Joint Motion for Voluntary 

Dismissal (Doc. 93) not later than December 22, 2010. 

ORDERED on December 15, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

DARREN RIDDOCK

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE

,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 17 , 202 3

§

§ Court Below: Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No

. 0603012717 (N)

§

§

Submitted: July 18

, 202 3

Decided: July 31 , 202 3

ORDER

On March 17 , 202 3

, the Court issued a briefing schedule in this appeal ; t he

appellant’s opening brief was due by April 18, 2023

. The Court later granted the

appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his brief, ordering that the opening

brief was due by June 20, 2023

. On June 21 , 2023

, Court staff sent a brief

delinquency letter to the appellant. On June 29, 2023

, the C hief Deputy Clerk issued

a notice, sent by certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why t his appeal

should not be dismissed for his failure to fil e an opening brief

. On July 7 , 202 3 , the

Court received the certified mail receipt indicating that the notice to show cause had

been delivered. The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause

within the required ten

- day period, dismissal of this action is deemed to be

unopposed.2

N OW, THEREFORE, IT IS OR DERED that the appeal is DISMISSED under

Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) and 29(b)

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow

Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      228
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,313
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              163
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,406
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   447
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     51
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 33
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        33
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
scvl-ex10c_8.htm



 

Exhibit 10-C

SUMMARY COMPENSATION SHEET

 

The following summarizes certain compensation decisions taken by the Compensation Committee (the "Committee") and/or the Board of Directors ("Board") of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the "Company"), with respect to the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers and directors.

 

1.  2020 Base Salary 

 

The Committee has not approved any adjustment to the base salaries for fiscal 2020 of each of the named executive officers set forth below.  The following base salaries remain effective for the Company’s named executive officers:

 


							
	
        
Name
	
 
	

Title
	
 
	
Base
Salary
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Clifton E. Sifford
	
 
	
Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	
 
	
$
	
716,000
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Mark J. Worden
	
 
	
President and Chief Customer Officer
	
 
	
$
	
600,000
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
W. Kerry Jackson
	
 
	
Senior Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer and Treasurer
	
 
	
$
	
583,500 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Timothy T. Baker
	
 
	
Executive Vice President -
Chief Retail Operations Officer
	
 
	
$
	
562,500
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Carl N. Scibetta
	
 
	
Executive Vice President – Chief Merchandising Officer
	
 
	
$
	
530,500
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 




 

The base salary for J. Wayne Weaver, Chairman of the Board, remained at $300,000 for fiscal 2020.

 

2.   Director's Compensation

 

The Company pays the following to its non-employee Directors:

 


			
	
Annual Cash Retainer
	
 
	
$60,000

	
Annual Committee Chair Cash Retainer
	
 
	
 

	
•   Audit Committee
	
 
	
$15,000

	
•   Compensation Committee
	
 
	
$10,000

	
•   Nominating and Governance Committee
	
 
	
$7,500

	
Annual Committee Member Cash Retainer (including Chairs)
	
 
	
 

	
•   Audit Committee
	
 
	
$10,000

	
•   Compensation Committee
	
 
	
$7,500

	
•   Nominating and Governance Committee
	
 
	
$5,000

	
Annual Lead Director Cash Retainer
	
 
	
$15,000




 

Non-employee Directors will annually receive a stock award valued at $60,000 as of the date of grant under the Company’s equity incentive plan.  The restrictions on the stock award lapse on January 2nd of the year following the year in which the grant was made.      

 

The Company also reimburses all Directors for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with meetings of the Board.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 216 (Thursday, November 8, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5316]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2007-28776; Airspace Docket No. 07-ACE-10]


Modification of Class E Airspace; Lee's Summit, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Direct final rule; confirmation of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document confirms the effective date of the direct final 
rule which revises Class E airspace at Lee's Summit, MO.

DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, December 20, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grant Nichols, System Support, DOT 
Regional Headquarters Building, Federal Aviation Administration, 901 
Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-2522.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published this direct final rule 
with a request for comments in the Federal Register on September 7, 
2007 (72 FR 51358). The FAA uses the direct final rulemaking procedure 
for a non-controversial rule where the FAA believes that there will be 
no adverse public comment. This direct final rule advised the public 
that no adverse comments were anticipated, and that unless a written 
adverse comment, or a written notice of intent to submit such an 
adverse comment, were received within the comment period, the 
regulation would become effective on December 20, 2007.
    Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more above 
the surface of the earth are published on Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 
7400.9R, signed August 1, 2007, and effective September 15, 2007, which 
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace 
designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in 
the Order.
    No adverse comments were received, and thus this notice confirms 
that this direct final rule will become effective on that date.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas on October 19, 2007.
Donald R. Smith,
Manager, System Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 07-5316 Filed 11-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# Time and Date:

8:30 a.m., Tuesday, February 13, 2007.

# Place:

NTSB Conference Center, 429 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20594.

# Status:

The two items are open to the public. 

# Matters to be Considered:

 

                        7862                         *Aviation Aircraft Accident Report*                        —Weather Encounter and Subsequent Collision into Terrain, Bali Hai Helicopter Tours, Inc., Bell 206B, N16849, Kalaheo, Hawaii, September 24, 2004.                    

                        7861                         *Aviation Accident Brief and Safety Recommendation Letter*                        —Weather Encounter and Subsequent Crash into the Pacific Ocean, Heli-USA Airways, Inc., Aerospatiale AS350BA, N355NT, Haena, Hawaii, September 23, 2005.                     

# News Media Contact:

Telephone: (202) 314-6100.

Individuals requesting specific accommodations should contact Chris Bisett at (202) 314-6305 by Friday, February 9, 2007.

                        The public may view the meeting via a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “News & Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

# FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:

Vicky D'Onofrio, (202) 314-6410.

Dated: February 2, 2007.

Vicky D'Onofrio, 

Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 07-541  Filed 2-2-07; 1:16 pm]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       47
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1
<INVENTORY>                                        954
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,442 
<PP&E>                                           1,127 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     656 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,315 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,989 
<BONDS>                                              0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                         2,798
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,515)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,315
<SALES>                                          1,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,855
<CGS>                                            2,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,177
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,067)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (29)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,038)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,038)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.73)
<FN>
<F1> Bad debt expense of 18 is included in the 1,636 reported as Selling and
     Administrative expenses.
<FN>
        

</TABLE>