IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

GAINESVILLE DIVISION 

SHERRIE RUSSELL-BROWN, 

 Plaintiff, 

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK 

v. 

 

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES, 

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, 

LEVIN COLLEGE OF LAW, and 

ROBERT H. JERRY, II, in his 

individual and official capacities as 

Dean of the University of Florida, 

Levin College of Law, 

Defendants. 

___________________________________/ 

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF HER MOTION FOR LEAVE 

TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 98) AND HER FIRST 

AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 97) 

 

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel for Plaintiff Sherrie Russell-Brown (“Plaintiff’ or 

“Ms. Russell-Brown”) and notifies this Court and all parties hereto: 

1. On July 15, 2010, in accordance with N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 15.1, Ms. Russell-Brown filed a 

First Amended Complaint (Doc. 97). Also on July 15, 2010, in accordance with the Report of the 

Parties’ Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Doc. 65), Ms. Russell-Brown filed a Motion for Leave to File a 

First Amended Complaint (Doc. 98), explaining that she wished to amend her Verified Complaint 

(Doc. 45) to conform it to material obtained in discovery and to add the University of Oxford 

(“Oxford”) as a named Defendant (Doc. 98, ¶ 1). 

2. On July 28, 2010, the Defendants filed their Response in Opposition to Ms. RussellBrown’s Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint (Doc. 113). 

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 126 Filed 08/06/10 Page 1 of 3
2

3. On July 29, 2010, Ms. Russell-Brown sought leave to file a Reply Memorandum to the 

Defendants’ Response (Doc. 116). 

4. On August 3, 2010, this Court granted, in part, Ms. Russell-Brown’s Motion for Leave 

to File a Reply Memorandum, requesting that Ms. Russell-Brown shall file her Reply Memorandum, 

no later than close of business today, Friday, August 6, 2010 (Doc. 119). 

5. Ms. Russell-Brown has reviewed and re-evaluated the discovery upon which the 

amendments to her Verified Complaint are based and has decided to withdraw her Motion for Leave 

to File a First Amended Complaint and her First Amended Complaint, from this Court. 

6. In light of Ms. Russell-Brown’s withdrawal of her Motion for Leave to File a First 

Amended Complaint and her First Amended Complaint, filing a Reply Memorandum in further 

support of her Motion for Leave, has been rendered moot. 

DATED this 6th day of August, 2010. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Lennox S. Hinds

Lennox S. Hinds 

New York Bar No. 8196 

Stevens, Hinds & White, PC 

116 West 111th Street 

New York, NY 10026-4206 

(212) 864-4445 

(212) 222-2680 (fax) 

lawfirmshw@yahoo.com 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 126 Filed 08/06/10 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on August 6, 2010, the foregoing has been filed with the Clerk 

of the Court and served electronically by using the CM/ECF system, upon the following: 

Ian S. Marx, Esq. 

Greenberg Taurig, LLP 

200 Park Avenue 

Florham Park, NJ 07932 

Richard C. McCrea, Jr., Esq. 

Greenberg Taurig, LLP 

Courthouse Plaza, Suite 100 

625 East Twiggs Street 

Tampa, FL 33602 

Attorneys for Defendants 

/s/ Lennox S. Hinds

Lennox S. Hinds 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

 

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 126 Filed 08/06/10 Page 3 of 3