alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Jacov Vaisman, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Advanced Medical Institute Inc. for the year ended June
30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Advanced Medical Institute Inc.

         I, Dilip Shrestha, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Advanced Medical Institute Inc. for the year ended June
30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Advanced Medical Institute Inc.


September 26, 2006


By:   /s/ Jacov Vaisman
      -----------------
      Jacov Vaisman
      Chief Executive Officer

By:   /s/ Dilip Shrestha
      ------------------
      Dilip Shrestha
      Chief Financial Officer
#### STATE v. MORRIS

No. 48.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 164.

Defendant’s notice of appeal under G.S. 7A-30 dismissed 12 July 1979. Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 19 July 1979.
PHILLIP BOATMAN
,
Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3218

Opinion filed September 16, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Bruce A. Miller, Public Defender, and David A. Dunkerley, Assistant Public Defender, Pensacola , for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Att orney General, and Charlie McCoy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of prohibition, petitioner seeks review of the lower tribunal’s

order denying his amended motion for disqualification. Upon revie w, we find that the

motion for disqualification was legally sufficient. The petition for writ of prohibition

is therefore granted and the trial judge is directed to enter an order of disqualification

which requests the chief circuit judge to appoint a suc cessor judge.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ.
, CONCUR.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60327

Summary Calendar

MILCIADES FELIZ-CRUZ,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A72 838 042

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Milciades Feliz-Cruz (Feliz) petitions this court for review

of the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings.

Feliz concedes that he has filed two motions to reopen, but he

contends that because his first motion alleged that he was denied

notice before the immigration judge issued an in absentia removal

order, the first motion should not count against the numerical

limitation placed on motions to reopen. Feliz cannot establish

that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his most recent

motion to reopen as exceeding the numerical limitation on such
2

filings. See Altamirano-Lopez v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 547, 549-50

(5th Cir. 2006); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), (3); 8 C.F.R.

§ 1003.23(b)(4)(ii).

Feliz also contends that the BIA abused its discretion by

refusing to reopen the case sua sponte, in light of the exceptional

circumstances he has shown. Because there is “no legal standard

against which to judge an [administrative agency’s] decision not to

invoke its sua sponte authority,” we lack jurisdiction to consider

this claim. See Enrizquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 246, 250

(5th Cir. 2004). Feliz’s petition for review is DENIED.
#### STATE v. LASSITER

No. 9 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 292.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 9 February 1972.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 6 DB 2022 (No. 5 RST 2022)

:

JOSHUA HAMILTON MEYEROFF : Attorney Registration No. 207732

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

 FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Bucks County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of February, 2022, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated February 15, 2022, is approved and it is ORDERED 

that Joshua Hamilton Meyeroff, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that 

he has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to 

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a 

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the 

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
**Exhibit10.1**

 

**STRAIGHT NOTE**

 
| $300,000 | South El Monte,  California | July 17, 2003 |
|----------|-----------------------------|---------------|

 

For value received, Lee Pharmaceuticals promises topay Monticello Drug Company or order, at South El Monte, California the sum ofTHREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS, with interest adjusted to the date funds arereceived, on unpaid principal at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum.  Interest only will be payable on the 20thof each month commencing August 20, 2003. Interest shall be calculated on the basis of the unpaid principalbalance daily, based on a 365-day year, actual day month and payable monthly.Principal and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the UnitedStates.  If action were instituted onthis note, I promise to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney’s fees.This note is secured by the trademark on the product brand Aquafilter®.  The due date of this note is October 12,2005 or later.

 

After two years, from July 17, 2003, either party cangive 90 days written notice to pay off or ask for the funds back.

 

1)  GeneralCorporate Obligation

 

2)  PersonalGuarantee of Ronald G. Lee

 

 
|   | JULY 9, 2003 |   | RONALD G. LEE                             |
|--------|--------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | Date         |   | Lee Pharmaceuticals -  Ronald G. Lee      |
|   |
|   |
|   | JULY 9, 2003 |   | MICHAEL L. AGRESTI                        |
|   | Date         |   | Lee Pharmaceuticals -  Michael L. Agresti |

 

----
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A0 31 0 . VI N CENT CRAW FORD v . THE STATE.

Fo l l owi n g a b en ch t ri al

, t h e t ri al co u rt fo u n d V i n cen t Crawfo rd g u i l t y o f

d ri v i ng un d er t h e i n fl u en ce o f al co h o l (“ DUI”), d ri v i n g wi th an u nl a w f u l al co h ol

c o ncen t rat i o n (wh i ch t h e co u rt m erg ed wi t h t h e DUI co n v i ct i on ), an d s p eed i n g

.

Crawfo rd ap p eal s fro m hi s ju d g m en t o f c o n v i ct i o n

, co n t en d in g t h at th e t ri al co u rt

erred wh en i t den i ed h i s m o t i on t o s u p p res s al l ev id en ce ob t ai n ed fo l l o wi n g t h e t raffi c

s t op t hat l ed t o h i s arr e s t

. In h i s m o t i o n t o su p pres s

, Crawfo rd arg u ed

, i n rel ev an t

p art

, t h at Geo rg i a’ s im p l i ed co n sen t st at ut e, OCGA § 4 0 -5 -6 7

. 1 (b ) (2 ), i s

u n co ns t it u t i o n al o n i t s face an d as ap p l i ed i n t h i s cas e.

Th e Su p rem e Co u rt “ h as ex cl u s i v e j u ri s d i ct i o n o v er al l c a s e s i nv o l v i n g

co n st ru ct i o n of t h e Co n s t i tu t i o n o f t he St at e o f Geo rg i a an d o f t h e Un i ted St at es an d

al l cas es i n wh i ch t h e co n s ti t u t i o n al i t y o f a l aw, o rd i n an ce, o r co n s t i t u t i o nal p ro v i s i o n

h as b een cal l ed in t o qu es t io n .” At l an t a In dep en d en t S ch o o l Sys t em v. La n e

, 2 6 6 Ga.

6 5 7

, 6 57 (1 ) (4 6 9 SE2 d 2 2) (1 99 6 ) (ci t i n g Ga. Co n s t

. of 1 98 3

, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par.

II (1 )). Becau s e t h e tri al co u rt reject ed Crawfo rd ’ s ch al l en g e t o t h e co n s t i t u t i o n al i t y

o f OCGA § 40 -5 -6 7 .1 (b ) (2 ) i n t h i s cas e, i t ap p ears th at ju ri s d i ct io n o v er t h i s ap p eal

m ay li e in t h e Su p rem e Co u rt

. A s t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as t h e u l t i m at e res p on s i b i l i t y

fo r d et erm i n in g ap p el l at e j u ri s d i ct i o n, s ee S a xt on v. Co a s ta l Di a lys i s & Med

. Cl i n i c, September 21, 2018In c.

, 2 6 7 Ga. 1 7 7

, 17 8 (4 76 SE2 d 5 8 7 ) (1 9 9 6), t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y TRANSFERRED

t o t he Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s po s i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 09/21/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,246,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,906,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 17,439,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,817,000
<PP&E>                                      51,873,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,087,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,603,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,189,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,904,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,701,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,603,000
<SALES>                                     36,276,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            36,276,000
<CGS>                                       33,152,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,350,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,040,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (397,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (643,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (643,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)


</TABLE>
# C_2011261EN.01000201.xml

| 3.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 261/02

| Date of adoption of the decision | 26.7.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.32780 (11/N) |
| Member State | Austria |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Änderung der staatlichen Beihilfe N 160/07 — Risikokapital-Regelung „Eigenkapitalgarantie“ |
| Legal basis | Bundesgesetz über besondere Förderungen von kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen (KMU-Förderungsgesetz) — Jungunternehmer- und Innovationsförderung für KMU — Haftungsübernahmen (Richtlinien des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend) — Programmdokument Eigenkapitalgarantie |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Objective | Risk capital |
| Form of aid | Provision of risk capital, Guarantee |
| Budget | | Annual budget: — |

Date of adoption of the decision

26.7.2011

Reference number of State Aid

SA.32780 (11/N)

Member State

Austria

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Änderung der staatlichen Beihilfe N 160/07 — Risikokapital-Regelung „Eigenkapitalgarantie“

Legal basis

Bundesgesetz über besondere Förderungen von kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen (KMU-Förderungsgesetz) — Jungunternehmer- und Innovationsförderung für KMU — Haftungsübernahmen (Richtlinien des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft, Familie und Jugend) — Programmdokument Eigenkapitalgarantie

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Objective

Risk capital

Form of aid

Provision of risk capital, Guarantee

Budget

Annual budget: —

| | Overall budget: EUR 70 million |
| --- | --- |

Overall budget: EUR 70 million

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2013

Economic sectors

All sectors

Name and address of the granting authority

| Austria Wirtschaftsservice GmbH |
| --- |
| Ungargasse 37 |
| 1030 Wien |
| ÖSTERREICH |

Austria Wirtschaftsservice GmbH

Ungargasse 37

1030 Wien

ÖSTERREICH

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

BARCLAYCARD FUNDING PLC

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002

I, Richard Francis Sommers, director of Barclaycard Funding PLC, certify
that to the best of my knowledge (i) the Form 20-F fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Barclaycard Funding PLC.

|    |  |                                                                       | 
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|By: |  | /s/     Richard Francis Sommers                                      
|    |  | Name: Richard Francis Sommers
Title:   Director
Date:   June 16, 2003
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 2 3

- 2394 LT Case No. 2016

- 302546

- CFDB

_____________________________
J OHNNIE D. L LOYD ,
Pe t itioner
,

v.

S TAT E OF F LORIDA ,
R e spondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal

. A Case of Original Jurisdiction

. Johnnie D. Lloyd , C arrabelle
, pro se

. No Appearance for Respondent

.

O c tober 10, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENI ED

.

M AKAR , H ARRIS , and K ILBANE , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 41-5 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 20 of 20
EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS 
Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc.
(In thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>

                                        
                                  Six Months
                                    Ended                Year Ended December 31
                                   June 30,   ----------------------------------------
                                    1997       1996    1995     1994     1993     1992
                                    ----       ----    ----     ----     ----     ----
<S>                              <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
  CHARGES                             

Income before income taxes and
  cumulative effect of accounting
  change                          $ 57,524 $153,421  $128,196 $101,255 $ 17,111 $ 24,042
Dividends received, net of equity
  in earnings (loss) of               
  unconsolidated affiliates          1,305    9,961    (3,704)    1,213       1   (1,931)
Fixed charges                       23,112   41,712    31,762   30,249   33,370   34,623
                                  -------- --------  -------- -------- -------- ---------

Income before cumulative effect
  of accounting change for
  computation purposes            $ 81,941 $205,094  $156,254 $132,717 $ 50,482 $ 56,734
                                  ======== ========  ======== ======== ======== =========

FIXED CHARGES

Interest expense, including 
  interest related to corporate 
  owned life insurance            $ 19,762 $ 34,963  $ 24,477 $ 22,582 $ 25,516 $ 26,313
Portion of rent expense 
  representing interest              3,078    6,288     6,903    7,303    7,490    7,987
Amortization of debt expense and
  debt discount                        272      461       382      364      364      323
                                  -------- --------  -------- -------- -------- --------
Total fixed charges               $ 23,112 $ 41,712  $ 31,762 $ 30,249 $ 33,370 $ 34,623
                                  ======== ========  ======== ======== ======== ========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges    3.5x     4.9x      4.9x     4.4x     1.5x     1.6x  
                                  ======== ========  ======== ======== ======== ========

<FN>
For the purpose of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
"earnings" consist of income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change, plus fixed charges and dividends received, net of equity in
earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates.  Fixed charges consists of
interest expense, the portion of rent expense representing interest and
amortization of debt discount.  
</FN>
</TABLE>

                                   -20-
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   3-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               MAR-31-2000
[CASH]                                       2,724,207
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                             2,724,207
[PP&E]                                         632,755
[DEPRECIATION]                                (34,324)
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               3,250,220
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                           23,047
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                       858,170
[OTHER-SE]                                   2,369,003
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 3,250,220
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                                     0
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                        0
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                               499,775
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                               3,949
[INCOME-PRETAX]                              (441,948)
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                          (441,948)
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                 (441,948)
[EPS-BASIC]                                     (0.03)
[EPS-DILUTED]                                   (0.03)
</TABLE>