alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 10.6**

 

MODIFICATION TOPROMISSORY NOTE

 

 

WHEREAS,on December 23, 1994, Lee Pharmaceuticals (“Maker”) and Henry L. Lee, Jr.(“Holder”) entered into an agreement (“Note”) whereby Lee Pharmaceuticals wasto pay to Henry L. Lee, Jr. the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars;and

 

WHEREAS,on June 30, 1998, the parties thereto modified said Note to extend thematurity date from June 30, 1998, until January 1, 2005, and the Notehad an option to extend the maturity date for an additional five years beyond January 1,2005.  All other terms and conditions ofthe Note remained the same.

 

WHEREAS,the parties thereto now desire to further modify said Note and Modification;

 

NOW,THEREFORE, the parties modify said Note and Modification as follows:

 

1.      The maturitydate of the Note is extended from January 1, 2005, until January 1,2010.

 

2.      All otherterms and conditions of the Note remain the same.

 

 

Dated  this  **24th** day  of  **February,  2005**

 

 
| ** ** | **RONALD  G. LEE**           |
|------------|------------------------------|
|       | Lee Pharmaceuticals          |
|       | By: Ronald G. Lee, President |
|       |                         |
|       |                         |
| ** ** | **HENRY  L. LEE, JR.**       |
|       | Henry L. Lee, Jr.       |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

11 a.m., Friday, November 23, 2007.

# PLACE:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED.

Surveillance Matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-5181  Filed 10-16-07; 4:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001096595
<NAME>                        Cartis, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         293,133
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  311,880
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    320,092
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               953,112
<PP&E>                                         130,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (30,086)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,057,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          227,496
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,105
<OTHER-SE>                                     829,727
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,057,223
<SALES>                                        191,821
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               441,694
<CGS>                                          (232,351)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (232,351)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               495,249
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,958)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (285,906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (298,429)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 19 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03446-AKH Document 19 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011141EN.01000301.xml

| 12.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/3 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | ------- |

---

Winding-up proceedings

Decision to open winding-up proceedings in respect of Novit Assicurazioni SpA and Sequoia Partecipazioni SpA

(Publication in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)

2011/C 141/03

| Insurance undertaking | Novit Assicurazioni SpA Via Pisa 29 10152 Torino TO ITALIA | Novit Assicurazioni SpA | Via Pisa 29 | 10152 Torino TO | ITALIA |
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------- | --------------------- | --------------- | ------ |
| Novit Assicurazioni SpA | | | | | |
| Via Pisa 29 | | | | | |
| 10152 Torino TO | | | | | |
| ITALIA | | | | | |
| Parent company of the insurance group of which the insurance undertaking is part | Sequoia Partecipazioni SpA Piazza Maria Teresa 3 10152 Torino TO ITALIA | Sequoia Partecipazioni SpA | Piazza Maria Teresa 3 | 10152 Torino TO | ITALIA |
| Sequoia Partecipazioni SpA | | | | | |
| Piazza Maria Teresa 3 | | | | | |
| 10152 Torino TO | | | | | |
| ITALIA | | | | | |
| Date, entry into force and nature of the decision | ISVAP measure No 2877 of 9 February 2011: Appointment of a receiver for provisional management within the meaning of Articles 230(1) and 275(1) of Legislative Decree No 209/2005 | | | | |
| Competent authorities | ISVAP Via del Quirinale 21 00187 Roma RM ITALIA | ISVAP | Via del Quirinale 21 | 00187 Roma RM | ITALIA |
| ISVAP | | | | | |
| Via del Quirinale 21 | | | | | |
| 00187 Roma RM | | | | | |
| ITALIA | | | | | |
| Supervisory authority | ISVAP Via del Quirinale 21 00187 Roma RM ITALIA | ISVAP | Via del Quirinale 21 | 00187 Roma RM | ITALIA |
| ISVAP | | | | | |
| Via del Quirinale 21 | | | | | |
| 00187 Roma RM | | | | | |
| ITALIA | | | | | |
| Receiver appointed | Dr Luciano Becchio Via Pisa 29 10152 Torino TO ITALIA | Dr Luciano Becchio | Via Pisa 29 | 10152 Torino TO | ITALIA |
| Dr Luciano Becchio | | | | | |
| Via Pisa 29 | | | | | |
| 10152 Torino TO | | | | | |
| ITALIA | | | | | |
| Applicable law | The law of Italy
Articles 230(1) and 275(1) of Legislative Decree No 209/2005 | | | | |

ISVAP measure No 2877 of 9 February 2011 provides for the appointment, within the meaning of Article 230 of Legislative Decree No 209 of 7 September 2005, of Dr Luciano Becchio as receiver for the provisional management of Novit Assicurazioni SpA, a company having its head office at Via Pisa 29, Turin, Italia, and Sequoia Partecipazioni SpA, a company having its head office at Piazza Maria Teresa 3, Turin, Italia, for a maximum period of two months from the date of adoption of the present measure. Consequently, the powers of the companies’ administrative and supervisory bodies are suspended.

---
#### MARVIN HUSSEY v. BENSON CRAIG YORK and ATTRESS JANET KIDD and ARLENE HUSSEY v. BENSON CRAIG YORK and ATTRESS JANET KIDD.

(Filed 22 November, 1961.)

Appeal by each plaintiff from *Gwyn, J.,*at April Civil Term, 1961, Of RANDOLPH.

Two civil actions instituted in Superior Court of Randolph (1) by plaintiff in No. 529 for recovery for personal injuries growing out of automobile collision allegedly caused by the negligence of defendants, and (2) by plaintiff in No. 580 for recovery of property damage.

Defendants, answering, deny negligence and plead contributory negligence of plaintiffs.

The two cases were consolidated for trial.

Upon the trial in Superior Court, the plaintiff in each case and the several defendants in each case offered evidence, and the cases were submitted to the jury upon identical issues (except as to names) under the charge of the court.

The jury in each case answered the issue as to negligence of defendants, and as to contributory negligence of plaintiff, in the affirmative, and awarded no damages.

From judgment in accordance therewith the respective plaintiffs *730except and appeal to Supreme Court, filing separate appeals, and assign error.

*Ottway Burton, Linwood T. Peoples for each plaintiff appellant.*

*Coltrane & Gavin for defendants appellees.*

PER Curiam.

In Supreme Court the two appeals were heard as one,— plaintiffs assigning many errors based upon exceptions taken in the course of the trial.

However, careful consideration of the evidence offered fails to reveal error of a prejudicial nature sufficient to require disturbing the verdict of the jury as rendered.

As to No. 529— No error.

As to No. 530— No error.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 5, 2012

Order 

October 5, 2012

144144-5(55)(56)

FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 144144

v COA: 298984

Mason CC: 09-000035-NF

MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 144145

v COA: 298985

Mason CC: 09-000172-NF

MICHIGAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, motions by defendants-appellees for extension of 

the time for filing their combined brief are considered and they are granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Income, Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        2,056,812
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         19,025
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             807,079
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            55,862
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     302,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,361,737
<COMMON>                                                 0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 22,509
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                      22,509
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             3,331,074
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                       0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        4,769,052
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                            0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                     239,102
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    8,361,737
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                          532,750
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               (77,862)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         371,950
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         294,088
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            238,668
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (152,869)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      85,793
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           100,906
<NET-INCOME>                                        21,112
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          8,037
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       13,075
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            54,147
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                           96,497
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                            (161,948)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           $0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           $0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               4
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (308)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,137
<PP&E>                                           5,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,943)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           413
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,095
<SALES>                                          4,761
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,263
<CGS>                                            2,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     28
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 28
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        28
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

COREY E. WASHINGTON,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-013-MMP-AK

R.P. TIFFT,

Respondent.

___________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the Court upon a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at Santa Rosa

Correctional Institution and challenges his conviction out of the Circuit Court of Dade

County, Florida. Jurisdiction is therefore appropriate in either this district or in the

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, as the districts of

confinement and conviction, respectively. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 

The district of conviction would appear to be the most convenient for witnesses

should an evidentiary hearing be necessary, and therefore, transfer of this cause to the

Southern District is appropriate. Mitchell v. Henderson, 432 F.2d 435, 436 (5th Cir.

1970) (division of conviction, where witnesses were located, was appropriate venue

over division of confinement in challenge to conviction); Parker v. Singletary, 974 F.2d

1562, 1582, n. 118 (11th Cir. 1992) (courts should give careful consideration to

convenience of witnesses in transferring habeas corpus petitions under § 2241(d)).
Page 2 of 2

It is therefore respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be TRANSFERRED to

the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida for all further

proceedings.

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 28th day of January, 2010.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after

being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of

review of proposed factual findings and recommendations. 

1:10cv13 MP-AK
| 1. | I      have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of      SourceForge, Inc.; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June      10, 2009 | By:   | /s/ Patricia S. Morris                                 |
|-------------------------------------|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |            | Patricia S.    Morris                                  |
|                                |            | Senior Vice President and Chief      Financial Officer |

----
### IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 2, 2016 I N RE 

### TIANNA B. Appeal from the Hamilton County Juvenile Court No. 263525 Robert D. Philyaw, Judge

________________________________ No. E2015 - 0 2189 - COA - R3 - PT FILED - JULY 6, 2016

_________________________________ C HARLES D. S USANO , J R . , J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. I concur completely in the majority’s opinion terminating the parental rights of Myron J. T. based upon the provisions of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36
- 1
- 113(g)(1) and § 36
- 1
- 102(1)(A)(i). I dissent from so much of the majority’s decision as holds that father does not fall within the ambit of Tenn. Code Ann. § 36
- 1
- 113(g)(9)(A) and § 36
- 1
- 117(c). I would hold that father is within the class of persons covered by these latter two statutes . On this point, I adhere to the majority opinion authored by me in the case of In re F.N.M. , No. M2015
- 00519
- COA
- R3
- PT, 20 16 WL 3126077 (Tenn. Ct. App., filed Apr. 11, 2016).

_______________________________ CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2239 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2239

   To codify an Executive order preparing the United States for the 
           impacts of climate change, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2019

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To codify an Executive order preparing the United States for the 
           impacts of climate change, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENACTMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER.

    (a) In General.--The provisions of Executive Order 13653 (78 Fed. 
Reg. 66819; relating to preparing the United States for the impacts of 
climate change (November 1, 2013)) (as in effect on March 27, 2017) are 
enacted into law.
    (b) Publication.--In publishing this Act in slip form and in the 
United States Statutes at Large pursuant to section 112 of title 1, 
United States Code, the Archivist of the United States shall include 
after the date of approval at the end an appendix setting forth the 
text of the Executive order referred to in subsection (a) (as in effect 
on March 27, 2017).
                                 <all>
```
[ DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________ ________________
No. 15

- 15000

________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14

- cv

- 24594

- MGC

In Re: MRS. PATRICIA DOUGHERTY,

BRIAN A. SIDMAN, an individual,

Plaintiff

- Counter Defendant

- Ap pellee,

versus

JOSEPH P. DOUGHERTY, 11106 Crescent Bay Blvd. Clermont, FL 34711 352

- 988

- 3507 an individual,

Defendant

- Third Party Plaintiff

- Counter Claimant

- Appellant, Case: 15-15000 Date Filed: 10/03/2017 Page: 1 of 32 DOMAINS BY PROXY LLC, a Delaware corporation, et al.,

Defendants,

LOUIS ROGERS 10900 Nuckols Road Suite 200 Glen Allen, VA 23060 804

- 290

- 7900, et al.,

Third Party Defendants.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

________________________ (October 3, 2017)

Before HULL, JORDAN, and BOGGS, * Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM :

After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs
, and with the
benefit of oral argument, this Court finds no reversible error in the district court’s
October 6, 2015 order denying Appellant Joseph P. Dougherty’s request for costs
and attorney’s fees or in the district court’s April 19, 2016 order denying Appellant

* Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. Case: 15-15000 Date Filed: 10/03/2017 Page: 2 of 33 Dougherty’s motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, we affirm both of the

district court’s orders.

AFFIRMED

. Case: 15-15000 Date Filed: 10/03/2017 Page: 3 of 3