alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         119,570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,553
<PP&E>                                       2,152,699
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,756,644
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,715,126
<BONDS>                                        842,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       127,188
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,072,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,756,644
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               491,156
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  846,663
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               290,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              93,444
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (697,921)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (697,921)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (697,921)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
Figueira Declaration Tab 132

Filed Under Seal Pursuant to Protective Order at 

Request of Defendants
Case 1:07-cv-03492-RJS Document 8 Filed 11/13/2007 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03492-RJS Document 8 Filed 11/13/2007 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03492-RJS Document 8 Filed 11/13/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ALISON SAPP WHITE,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 3:10cv102/RS-EMT

BREG, INC., a Delaware corporation,

and I-FLOW CORPORATION, a Delaware

corporation,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Joint Report of Parties’ Planning Meeting (Doc. 23). 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The parties shall file an amended joint report not later than October 25,

2010, with dates consistent with a discovery deadline of March 25, 2011,

and jury trial on May 23, 2011, June 6, 2011, or June 20, 2011.

2. Plaintiff’s deposition shall be taken at the earliest practicable time and

prior to her inability to travel because of her pregnancy.

3. Appropriate discovery, such as standard of care, causation, and

damages, shall not be delayed for what counsel describe as “completion

of initial phase of discovery.” Likewise, necessary discovery shall not be

delayed until completion of so-called “paper discovery”.
ORDERED on October 14, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2011286EN.01000101.xml

| 30.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 286/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 28.6.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.31225 (11/N) |
| Member State | Greece |
| Region | Anatoliki Makedonia Thraki; Kentriki Makedonia; Sterea Ellada |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Ενίσχυση υπέρ των εταιρειών παροχής αερίου (ΕΠΑ) στην Ανατολική Μακεδονία — Θράκη, στην Κεντρική Μακεδονία και στη Στερεά Ελλάδα |
| Legal basis | Νόμος 3428/2005 περί απελευθέρωσης αγοράς φυσικού αερίου. Νόμος 2364/1995 Εισαγωγή, μεταφορά, εμπορία και διανομή φυσικού αερίου. Κοινή υπουργική απόφαση που θα εκδοθεί βάσει του άρθρου 7(19) του νόμου 2364/1995 από τους υπουργούς Περιβάλλοντος, Ενέργειας και Κλιματικής Αλλαγής και Περιφερειακής Ανάπτυξης και Ανταγωνιστικότητας |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Regional development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | | Overall budget: EPA Anatoliki Makedonia Thraki: EUR 22,67 million |

Date of adoption of the decision

28.6.2011

Reference number of State Aid

SA.31225 (11/N)

Member State

Greece

Region

Anatoliki Makedonia Thraki; Kentriki Makedonia; Sterea Ellada

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Ενίσχυση υπέρ των εταιρειών παροχής αερίου (ΕΠΑ) στην Ανατολική Μακεδονία — Θράκη, στην Κεντρική Μακεδονία και στη Στερεά Ελλάδα

Legal basis

Νόμος 3428/2005 περί απελευθέρωσης αγοράς φυσικού αερίου. Νόμος 2364/1995 Εισαγωγή, μεταφορά, εμπορία και διανομή φυσικού αερίου. Κοινή υπουργική απόφαση που θα εκδοθεί βάσει του άρθρου 7(19) του νόμου 2364/1995 από τους υπουργούς Περιβάλλοντος, Ενέργειας και Κλιματικής Αλλαγής και Περιφερειακής Ανάπτυξης και Ανταγωνιστικότητας

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Regional development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EPA Anatoliki Makedonia Thraki: EUR 22,67 million

| | EPA Kentriki Makedonia: EUR 11,94 million |
| --- | --- |

EPA Kentriki Makedonia: EUR 11,94 million

| | EPA Sterea Ellada: EUR 8,06 million |
| --- | --- |

EPA Sterea Ellada: EUR 8,06 million

Intensity

| | EPA Anatoliki Makedonia Thraki: 37,19 % |
| --- | --- |

EPA Anatoliki Makedonia Thraki: 37,19 %

| | EPA Kentriki Makedonia: 30 % |
| --- | --- |

EPA Kentriki Makedonia: 30 %

| | EPA Sterea Ellada: 14,58 % |
| --- | --- |

EPA Sterea Ellada: 14,58 %

Duration (period)

Until 31.12.2015

Economic sectors

Electricity, gas and water supply

Name and address of the granting authority

Υπουργείο Περιβάλλοντος, Ενέργειας και Κλιματικής Αλλαγής

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
#### STATE v. ARTHUR

No. 183 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 464.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 8 July 1981.
atel_Ex4_1


		
			Exhibit 4.1
		

		
			DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY MEMBERSHIP INTEREST (“UNITS”)
		

		
			Fast Act Exhibit 4(vi) “Description of registrant’s securities”
		

		
			Summary
		

		
			The following description summarizes certain important terms of ATEL 14, LLC’s (the “Company”) membership interests (the “Units”). This description summarizes the provisions that are included in the Company’s Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”).  This summary will not provide all the information relevant to the Units. For a complete description of the Units,  please refer to the applicable provisions of Company’s  Operating Agreement and relevant California governing law.
		

		
			Outstanding Units
		

		
			8,246,919 Units have been subscribed by the members of the Company as of December 31, 2019.
		

		
			General
		

		
			Liquidity. The Units were offered and sold pursuant to registration under the Securities Act of 1933, and subsequently registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  However, the Units are subject to significant restriction on transferability in order to preserve the tax characterization of the Company and tax consequences for Unit holders.  Accordingly, the Units are not traded on any securities exchange and have limited liquidity.  Please review the rights of Unit holders for transfer of shares under the Operating Agreement.
		

		
			Voting Rights. The holders of Units are entitled to one vote per share on any matter to be voted upon by holders of Units in the Company’s Operating Agreement. Certain rights may only be exercised upon receiving at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by Unit holders
		

		
			Distributions. The holders of Units are entitled to distributions on a pro rata basis, if, as, and when distributed by the Manager.
		

		
			Other Rights. No holder of Units has any priority or preemptive right as to the Units.
		

		
			Dissolution and Winding Up. Upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the Unit holders are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of creditors.
		

		
			Transfer Agent and Registrar. The transfer agent and registrar of the Units is Conduent Inc.
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION   I, Richard R. Walters, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  May 14, 2007  By:   /s/ Richard R. Walters Richard R. Walters, President, Principal Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Presidential Documents

5149 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 23 

Monday, February 5, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of January 25, 2007 

Assignment of Functions Under the Darfur Peace and 

Accountability Act of 2006 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and laws 

of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, 

I hereby assign to you the functions of the President under sections 6(a), 

6(b), and 6(f) of the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act of 2006 (Public 

Law 109–344). In performing such functions, you shall consult with other 

heads of departments and agencies, as appropriate. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, January 25, 2007. 

[FR Doc. 07–512 

Filed 2–2–07; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRE0GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice                           ( print page 59540)                        is hereby given of the following meeting.                

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group Biobehavioral and Behavioral Sciences Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         November 13-14, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         9 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Doubletree Hotel, 1515 Rhode Island NW., Washington, DC 20005.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marita R. Hopmann, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6911,                         *hopmannm@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: October 12, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth, 

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5196  Filed 10-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
#### BANK v. HAMMOND

No. 88 PC.

No. 41 (Fall Term)

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 34.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 1 May 1979.
#### QUIS v. GRIFFIN

No. 20 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 477.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 November 1979.
O pinion filed April 2 , 20 20



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

____ _ ______ 

### No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 2 71

- C R

_____ __ ____


### FRANKLIN DELANO LEE , J R ., Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 35th District Court Brown County, Texas Trial Court Cause No

. CR24668

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant, Franklin Delano Lee, Jr., waived a jury and pleaded not guilty to
the offense of possession of less than one gram of a controlled substance

. T he trial

court convicted Appellant of the offense and asses sed punishment at twenty

- four
months’ confinement

. We affirm

. Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel has filed in this court a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported b y a brief in which counsel concludes that there are no arguable issues to present on appeal. Counsel provided Appellant with a copy of the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, and a copy of a form motion so that Appellant could obtain a copy of the ap pellate record . Counsel advised Appellant2

of his right to review the record and file a response to counsel’s brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of his right to file a petition for discretionary review. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 68. Court

- appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Appellant subsequently filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief. We have reviewed Appellant’s response. In addressing an Anders brief and a pro se response, a court of appeals may only determine (1) that the appeal is wholly frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that it has reviewed the record and finds no reversible error or (2) that arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief the issues. Schulm an , 252 S.W.3d at 409; Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman , we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree with counsel that no arguable grounds for appeal
exis t

. 1 We grant Appellant’s counsel’s motion to the extent that c ounsel requests to
withdraw

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

April 2 , 2020 PER CURIAM Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J. 2
Willson, J., not participating.

1 We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 68.

2 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Ea stland, sitting by assignment.
Opinion issued February 23, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-23-00107-CV

———————————

IN RE AMY ZAVESKY, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Amy Zavesky, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus challenging 

the trial court’s December 9, 2022 “Order Denying [Relator’s] Motion to Strike 

Deemed Admissions,” asserting that the trial court abused its discretion by finding 

that requests for admission, served by real party in interest, Kayla Woodling, were 

deemed admitted based on relator’s failure to timely respond when the requests for 

admission “were never properly served.” In her mandamus petition, relator requests 
2

that the Court grant her petition for writ of mandamus and “reverse the trial court’s 

Order Denying [Relator’s] Motion to Strike Deemed Admissions.”1

In connection with her petition for writ of mandamus, relator also filed a 

“Motion for Temporary Relief,” requesting that this Court “stay the trial of the 

underlying proceeding,” currently set on the trial court’s docket for March 13, 2023, 

“until such time as the issues raised” in her petition for writ of mandamus were 

resolved by the Court.

We deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

Any pending motions, including relator’s “Motion for Temporary Relief,” are 

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Landau, Countiss, and Guerra.

1 The underlying case is Kayla Woodling v. Amy Zavesky, Cause No. 21-CV-0848, in 

the 212th District Court of Galveston County, Texas, the Honorable Patricia Grady

presiding.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 4 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 5 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 6 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 7 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 8 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 9 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 10 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 11 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 12 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 13 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 14 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 15 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 16 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 17 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 18 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 19 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 20 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 21 of 22
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-38 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 22 of 22