alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011169EN.01001401.xml

| 9.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 169/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 169/14

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2011/C 169/09

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 (1) on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, the Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Tungsten electrodes | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 260/2007 (OJ L 72, 13.3.2007, p. 1) | 14.3.2012 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Tungsten electrodes

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 260/2007 (OJ L 72, 13.3.2007, p. 1)

14.3.2012

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
#### STATE v. CLEMMONS

No. 70 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 192.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1978.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 211 (Thursday, November 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 61873]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5448]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION:  Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Tuesday, November 13, 2007, 10 a.m.-1 p.m.

Place: U.S. Election Assistance Commission, 1225 New York Ave., NW., 
Suite 150, Washington, DC 20005.

Agenda:  Commissioners will discuss and consider adopting a strategic 
plan; Commissioners may consider an internal policy for handling State 
requests to change State-specific instructions to the National Voter 
Registration Form; Commissioners will consider individual State 
requests to change State-specific instructions to the form; 
Commissioners will receive the following presentations: A report on a 
voter registration data base study; an update on recommendations by the 
Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC) for voting systems 
guidelines and timeline leading to adoption of a final version; a 
report on a draft voting systems test laboratory accreditation manual; 
Commissioners will discuss other administrative matters.
    This meeting will be open to the public.

Person to Contact for Information:  Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 07-5448 Filed 10-30-07; 9:30 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-M
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

                         Revision of the Revised Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Smoky Canyon Mine Panels F & G Project, as published in the                         **Federal Register**                         pages 77118 to 77120 on December 29, 2005 (Vol. 70, No. 249). This revision includes a change of the project schedule.                    

# SUMMARY:

                        The USDA, Forest Service, DOI, Bureau of Land Management and Idaho Department of Environmental Quality prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement that documented the analysis and disclosed the environmental impacts of the proposed Smoky Canyon Mine, Panels F and G Project, a phosphate mine expansion. The DEIS was released for comment in December 2005 and a Notice of Availability was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 29, 2005.                    

This revised Notice of Intent is to document a change in the schedule for the release of the FEIS. In the original NOI, dated September 15, 2003, the tentative date for release of the FEIS was September 2005; in the update to the NOI on December 29, 2005 the FEIS was scheduled for release in July, 2006. Due to scheduling changes, the release of the FEIS is now scheduled for October 2007.

# DATES:

A FEIS is expected to be completed by the end of October, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

For further information, mail correspondence to Jeff Jones, Team Leader, Caribou-Targhee National Forest, 4350 Cliff Drive, Pocatello, ID 83204 or telephone (208) 236-7572.

Dated: October 3, 2007.

Lawrence Timchak,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 07-4972 Filed 10-09-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:01cr32LAC

STEVEN DUNKLIN

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on October 11, 2007

Motion/Pleadings: RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER and MOTION TO PROCEED WITH 

PENDING LITIGATION, TO WIT SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION. AMEND AND OR

ADJUST 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 9/28/2007 Doc.# 333

RESPONSES:

BY GOVERNMENT on3/27/08 Doc.# 347

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 31st day of

March, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:01-cr-00032-LC-MD Document 348 Filed 03/31/08 Page 1 of 1
FAIRCHILD INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
595 Hornby Street, Suite 603
Vancouver, British Columbia V6C 1A4 Canada
604-646-5614

January 15, 2002

Praxis Pharmaceuticals Inc.
#100 - 856 Homer Street
Vancouver, BC V6B 2W5

Gentlemen:

This letter outlines our agreement pertaining to the Termination of License And Research & Development Agreement Dated the 28th day of February, 2001 (the "Termination Agreement"). In the Termination Agreement, Fairchild and Praxis had agreed that Praxis would retain those common shares of Fairchild issued to Praxis under the terms of the original license agreement; and that Praxis would pay to Fairchild 30% of Net Revenues from sales of the agents in the arthritis and topical treatment of dermal wrinkles to a maximum of $250,000 over the first three years of sales (the "Royalty Obligation").

Fairchild and Praxis now amend the Termination Agreement as follows:

1. Praxis shall be entitled to retain the common shares of Fairchild; however, the remaining shares (the "Shares") shall be placed in a voluntary pooling arrangement under which an amount shall be released every three months to Praxis. That amount shall be 1% of the total number of Fairchild's outstanding shares.

2. So long as Praxis pays Fairchild 66.6% of the proceeds from the sale of the Shares until US$175,000 has been paid, Fairchild shall deem that payment to be in full and complete satisfaction of the Royalty Obligation described above.

Please sign below to indicate your agreement and acceptance of this amendment to the Termination Agreement.

FAIRCHILD INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

By: /s/ Robert Grace
_______________________________
Robert Grace, President

Agreed to and accepted this 15th day of January, 2002.
PRAXIS PHARMACEUTICALS INC.

By: /s/ Robert Smith
_______________________________
Robert Smith, Secretary
# C_2011307EN.01000101.xml

| 19.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 307/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 307/1

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 307/01

| Date of adoption of the decision | 18.7.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of State Aid | SA.33117 (11/N) |
| Member State | Denmark |
| Region | — |
| Title (and/or name of the beneficiary) | Fionia — modification of commitments |
| Legal basis | Lov nr. 1003 af 10. oktober 2008, rammeaftale mellem afviklingsselskabet og Fionia Bank af 22. februar 2009 |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Aid to remedy serious disturbances in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant, Other forms of equity intervention |
| Budget | Overall budget: DKK 9 300 million |
| Intensity | — |
| Duration (period) | 2009-2014 |
| Economic sectors | Financial intermediation |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Afviklingsselskabet til sikring af finansiel stabilitet A/S Dronningens Tværgade 4,1 |
| 1302 København K |
| DANMARK |

Date of adoption of the decision

18.7.2011

Reference number of State Aid

SA.33117 (11/N)

Member State

Denmark

Region

—

Title (and/or name of the beneficiary)

Fionia — modification of commitments

Legal basis

Lov nr. 1003 af 10. oktober 2008, rammeaftale mellem afviklingsselskabet og Fionia Bank af 22. februar 2009

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Aid to remedy serious disturbances in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant, Other forms of equity intervention

Budget

Overall budget: DKK 9 300 million

Intensity

—

Duration (period)

2009-2014

Economic sectors

Financial intermediation

Name and address of the granting authority

Afviklingsselskabet til sikring af finansiel stabilitet A/S Dronningens Tværgade 4,1

1302 København K

DANMARK

Other information

—

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/state_aids_texts_en.htm

---
# C_2012229EN.01014501.xml

| 31.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/145 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/145

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Council directive laying down requirements for the protection of the health of the general public with regard to radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption’

COM(2012) 147 final — 2012/0074 (NLE)

2012/C 229/30

On 17 April 2012 the Commission decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 31 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Council directive laying down requirements for the protection of the health of the general public with regard to radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption.

Proposal for a

laying down requirements for the protection of the health of the general public with regard to radioactive substances in water intended for human consumption.

COM(2012) 147 final — 2012/0074 (NLE)

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided, at its 481st plenary session of 23 and 24 May 2012 (meeting of 23 May 2012), by 159 votes to 7 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 23 May 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58823-58827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5114]



[[Page 58823]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 08-05]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.
    The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of 
Representatives, Transmittals 08-05 with attached transmittal, policy 
justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

    Dated: October 11, 2007.
L.M. Bynum,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-M

[[Page 58824]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17OC07.020


[[Page 58825]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17OC07.021


[[Page 58826]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17OC07.022


[[Page 58827]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN17OC07.023

[FR Doc. 07-5114 Filed 10-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### STATE v. McAULIFFE

No. 62.

Case below: 22 N.C. App. 601.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 24 September 1974. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 24 September 1974.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 22

- 00258

- CR

MARTIN VEGA GUZMAN

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the 361st District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20

- 02796

- CRF

- 361

ABATEMENT ORDER

Appellant has filed a Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel. As

Appellant ’ s appellate counsel was appointed by the trial court, we abate this case to the

trial court f or resolution of Appellant ’ s motion. The t rial court shall resolve Appellant ’ s

motion within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order. After the trial court has

ruled, the clerk of the court shall file a supplemental clerk ’ s record with this court

wi thin ten (10) days.Guzman v. State Page 2 PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson , and

Justice Smith

Appeal abated

Order delive red and filed Oct ober 28, 2022

Do not publish
# C_2012351EN.01009001.xml

| 15.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/90

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing’

COM(2012) 332 final — 2012/162 (COD)

2012/C 351/21

On 2 and 10 July 2012 respectively, the European Parliament and the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing

COM(2012) 332 final — 2012/162 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 483rd plenary session of 18 and 19 September 2012 (meeting of 18 September), by 141 votes in favour, nem. con. and 7 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 18 September 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard R. Walters, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company.    /s/ Richard R. Walters DATE:  May 14, 2008 Richard R. Walters, President   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14-7 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY

OF WAUSAU,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-56454

D.C. No. 

5:10-cv-00810-VAP-DTB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Virginia A. Phillips, Chief Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 9, 2016 

Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, BEA, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.

Employers Insurance Company of Wausau (Wausau) appeals the district

court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Lexington Insurance Company

FILED

DEC 16 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
(Lexington) in this equitable contribution action. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

The accident report prepared by the California Department of Industrial

Relations Division of Occupational Health is admissible evidence, see Fed. R.

Evid. 803(8); Cal. Labor Code § 6313(a), and therefore the district court did not err

in considering it, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c). 

The district court did not err in concluding that Lexington had no duty to

indemnify the insured. There is no genuine issue of material fact as to whether

“earth movement” at least “contributed to” or “aggravated” the bodily injuries in

issue, and the Lexington policy’s subsidence exclusion therefore applies. See id.

56(c)(1); id. 56(e)(2). The district court did not err in concluding that the

concurrent causation doctrine is inapplicable because Wausau failed to adduce any

evidence of “two negligent acts or omissions of the insured, one of which,

independently of the excluded cause, renders the insured liable for the resulting

injuries.” Daggs v. Foremost Ins. Co., 148 Cal. App. 3d 726, 730 (1983).

The district court did not err in concluding that Lexington had no duty to

defend the insured. The Lexington policy’s excess-only other-insurance provision

was narrowly focused on risks associated with auto accidents, which were

generally outside the scope of Lexington’s CGL policy, and did not conflict with

2
an other-insurance provision in the Wausau policy. Therefore, the provision was

enforceable under California law. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v. Travelers Indem. Co.,

110 Cal. App. 4th 710, 725–27 (2003). In Federal Insurance Co. v. Lexington

Insurance Co., No. 5:11-cv-895 (C.D. Cal. 2011), Lexington argued that a broad

escape-clause other-insurance provision was not enforceable; such an argument is

not clearly inconsistent with the one Lexington raises here, and therefore

Lexington is not judicially estopped from reliance on its other-insurance provision

here. Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. Clinton, 766 F.3d 991, 1001 (9th Cir. 2014). 

Wausau’s pending motion for judicial notice is GRANTED IN PART as to

the memorandum of points and authorities and DENIED IN PART in all other

respects.

AFFIRMED.

3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

=================x

RALPH VANACORE,

AFFIRMATION OF

SERVICE

Plaintiff,

Index # 07 CV 3579 (LTS) (MHD)

-against -

JOHN MATTINGLY, et aI.,

Defendants.

-------========:==:==x

SCOTT B. SCHWARTZ, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the

Federal Court for the Southern District of New York, deposes and says:

On August 28, 2007, I served an Endorsed Letter adjourning the Rule 26 Conference

from September 13, 2007 to September 25, 2007, by electronic mail (lgriffit@law.nyc.gov) and

by facsimile (212) 788-8877, on the following individual:

Lisa Griffith, Esq.

Corporation Counsel for the City of New York

Attorney for Defendants

100 Church Street

New York, New York 10007

(212) 788-0903

Dated: August 28, 2007

New York, New York

~'//~~~#" --,~--- ~

SCOTT B. SCHWARTZ

Case 1:07-cv-03579-LTS-MHD Document 13 Filed 08/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-k for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zhao Yan Ding,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my
knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
April  29, 2009


GFR
      PHARMACEUTICALS, INC./s/Zhao Yan DingZhao
      Yan Ding, Chief Executive
Officer