alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000059479
<NAME>                        Lilly Industries, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           6,185
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,793
<INVENTORY>                                     46,504
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               141,136
<PP&E>                                         134,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (52,426)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 495,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          113,922
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     94,312
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   495,882
<SALES>                                        150,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,904
<CGS>                                           93,832
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  132,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (38)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,752
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,963
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,284
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
        



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5



    <S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                         JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                          DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                                    164,455
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           1,275,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                              119,590
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        1,373,648
<PP&E>                                                  1,934,884
<DEPRECIATION>                                            749,467
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          4,210,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   1,542,461
<BONDS>                                                    29,133
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<COMMON>                                                   10,406
<OTHER-SE>                                              3,628,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            4,210,875
<SALES>                                                 4,572,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        4,572,489
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           4,360,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         (22,658)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           234,574
<INCOME-TAX>                                              (16,912)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       217,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                              217,662
<EPS-BASIC>                                                 0.023
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.020





</TABLE>
#### SINK v. EASTER

No. 93.

Reported: 284 N.C. 555.

Petition by Sink to rehear denied 15 March 1974.
# C_2011049EN.01000401.xml

| 16.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/4

---

Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP apply

2011/C 49/03

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP (1).

1

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the abovementioned Annex should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2011/101/CFSP.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 (2), in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 7 of the Regulation).

2

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered. Any such request should be sent to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's Decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 42, 16.2.2011, p. 6.

1

(2)  OJ L 55, 24.2.2004, p. 1.

2

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DONNA ROBINS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 5:10cv53/RS/MD

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This case is before the court upon plaintiff’s complaint filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of

Social Security denying plaintiff’s claim for benefits. Pending is the defendant’s

motion to remand pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) (doc. 22). The plaintiff does

not oppose the motion according to the certification of the defendant.

Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the court may “enter, upon the

pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing

the decision of the [Commissioner], with or without remanding the cause for a

rehearing.” The Commissioner of Social Security states that remand is appropriate

for the ALJ to further consider the severity of plaintiff’s mental impairments. In

doing so, the ALJ will discuss and consider all of the relevant evidence including the

October 30, 2006 psychological evaluation of Dr. Renee Baskin. Good cause has

been shown for remand.

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED as follows:
Page 2 of 2

1. That the defendant’s motion to remand (doc. 22) be GRANTED and the

Commissioner’s decision denying benefits be REVERSED.

2. That this case be remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security

pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

3. That defendant be ordered to direct the Administrative Law Judge to

further consider the severity of plaintiff’s mental impairments. In doing so, the ALJ

will discuss and consider all of the relevant evidence including the October 30, 2006

psychological evaluation of Dr. Renee Baskin.

4. That the clerk be directed to enter judgment for plaintiff and close the

file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9 day of November, 2010. th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within fourteen days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that

may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the magistrate judge and al other

parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No: 5:10cv53/RS/MD
# C_2011303EN.01000701.xml

| 14.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/7

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 303/05

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 13.8.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 13.8.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | SOL/8AB. |
| Species | Common sole (Solea solea) |
| Zone | VIIIa and VIIIb |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 870462 |

Date and time of closure

13.8.2011

Duration

13.8.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

SOL/8AB.

Species

Common sole (Solea solea)

Solea solea

Zone

VIIIa and VIIIb

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

870462

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Dazzling Investments,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gloria Eck, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: May 24, 2005                       By: /s/ GLORIA ECK
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Gloria Eck
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          and Director



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO DAZZLING INVESTMENTS, INC., AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY DAZZLING INVESTMENTS, INC., AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
# CE2014068EN.01008602.xml

| 7.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 68/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 68/86

---

Tuesday 23 October 2012Appointment of a member of the Court of Auditors (Leonard Orban)

P7_TA(2012)0374

European Parliament decision of 23 October 2012 on the appointment of Leonard Orban as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C7-0153/2012 – 2012/0805(NLE))

2014/C 68 E/16

(Consultation)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0153/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0153/2012),

| — | having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0296/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0296/2012),

| A. | whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

A.

whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

| B. | whereas at its meeting of 26 September 2012 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

B.

whereas at its meeting of 26 September 2012 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors;

| 1. | Delivers a negative opinion on the Council’s appointment of Leonard Orban as a Member of the Court of Auditors; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Delivers a negative opinion on the Council’s appointment of Leonard Orban as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GUELINO AMBROISE,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-cv-124-SPM-WCS

ERIC H. HOLDER, et al.,

Respondents.

___________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation (doc. 18). Petitioner has been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No

objections have been filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, it

is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (doc. 18) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Petitioner’s § 2241 petition is dismissed as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this fourth day of August, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
**EXHIBIT 99.4**
ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 4) PLC
     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Barclay Bank PLC (the“Bank”), as Servicer, pursuant to the Beneficiaries Servicing Agreement, datedas of November 23, 1999 ( the “Agreement”), among the Bank, as Servicer andBarclaycard Funding PLC, as Investor Beneficiary, does hereby certify that:
     1. The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement. Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have theirrespective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.
     2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.
     3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2003 was conducted under my supervision.
     4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations under theAgreement throughout such calendar year and no material default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuingexcept as set forth in the Paragraph 5 below.
     5. The following is a description of each material default in the performance of the Servicer’s obligations under the provisions ofthe Agreement known to the undersigned to have been made by the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2003, whichsets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such defaultand (iii) the current status of each such default:
None.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this AnnualServicer’s Certificate this 21st day of June, 2004.   Barclays Bank PLCas ServicerBy: /s/ Richard Francis Sommers Name: Richard Francis Sommers Title: Finance Director
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MICHAEL J. LOEBER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09-cv-402/RS/MD

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Consent Motion to File Response to Motion to 

Dismiss (Doc. 34). Plaintiff shall file his response to Defendant’s Motion to 

Dismiss (Doc. 33) not later than July 12, 2010. 

ORDERED on June 28, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**OF KNOLOGY, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Knology, Inc. (the “Company”) that, to his knowledge, this annual report onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (this “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated:March 14, 2008
UNL'I'LL) S'l'A'l'LS IIISTRICT COUK'I' 

SOUTHERN DISTRIC'S 01: NEW YORK 

IN RE: 

i hl:ZSTER FILE 

FOSAMAX PKOLl1!C'TS LIABILITY L,lTIGA'I'lON 

1 106-M 11- 1 789 (JFK) 

'177i.~ Llocuntent Keicrles To All Ac1ion.c 

ORDER FOR .4DhIISSION PRO HAG VICE 

Considering the Cerlijicate 01' Good Standing and ol l othcr docut~~cnts rcquired by Case 

Management Order No. 5 submitted by counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

..ll-'pl icant's Name: Kathlccn Sullivan Hardway UC-' r;srz,L *--I--- ---- 

Firm N;~mt.: Venable LLP 

Address: -1'tvo I Iopkins Plaza. Suite 1 800 

1 

CityIStatclZip: Haltimore. Maryland 2 1201 . w ,--- -- , ) 

3 -/y-u3 f 

_--..--....-- ii L-.- - .' "---"--urn"- 

-- .AIWI 

.I TelephoneTax: (4 1 0) 244-7400/(4 10) 244-7742 

Email Address: k shard~~-ay51::ve11able.com 

is acimilted to practice pro har \ icc as counsel lbr hIt.1-c.k & Co.. Iric. in the ahoi r. c:iptioned case 

in the I!nited Statcs I)isrric~ C'our~ fill- the Southern District of New York. 

New Yorli. Neu 1'~lrk 

d' 

r - 

(/ Il'nited States District Judge 

Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 23 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Good 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DISTRICT OF MARYLAND 

I, Felicia C. Cannon, Clerk of the United States District Court for the District 

of hlaryland, 

DO HEREBY CERTIFY that, KATHLEEY F. SCLLI17AN, 

ESQUIRE, BAR NUMBER 25406, was duly admitted to practice in the 

United States District Court for the District of Mar?land on September I I, 1998, 

and is currently in good standing as a member of the bar of this Court. 

Dated at Baltimore, Maryland FEI,ICIA C. CANNOY 

Clerk 

Tina Stavrou - Deputy Clerk 

Case 1:07-cv-03466-JFK Document 23 Filed 03/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JEAN FAUSTIN VOLTAIRE,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00126-MP-WCS

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DAVID HARVEY, ERIC H HOLDER,

JANET NAPOLITANO, MICHAEL ROZOS,

Respondents.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 14, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the petition in this case be dismissed. No objections have

been filed, and the Report and Recommendation was returned as undeliverable because

Petitioner has been released and did not provide an updated address. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. The Petition in this case is dismissed as moot and for failure to prosecute.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of March, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 1 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 2 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 3 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 4 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 5 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 6 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 7 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 8 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 9 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 10 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 11 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 12 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 13 of 14
Case 4:10-cv-00039-MP-WCS Document 3-5 Filed 02/05/10 Page 14 of 14