T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. FE RNAN DO HERNAN DEZ GOM EZ , a. k. a. F ernand o H ernand ez , D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 10- 50037 D. C . No . 2 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 8 5 0 - GA F ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G a ryA . F e e s s , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry15, 2011 ** B efo re: C A N B Y , F E RN A N D E Z , an d M . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F ernand o H ernand ez G om ez appeal s f rom the 70 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for bei ng an i l l egal al i en foun d i n the U ni t ed 

# FI LED FEB 23 2 011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50037 2 S t a t e s f ol l ow i ng de port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e a f f irm , b u t r e m a n d to c o rr e c t th e ju d g m e n t. H ernand ez G om ez fi rs tcont ends thatthe di stri ctcourtcom m i tt ed procedural e rr orbyi m pos i ng as e nt e nc e ba s e d on c l e a r l ye rr one ous f a c t s a nd bygi vi ng e xc e s s i ve w e i ghtt o one of the 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) f a c t or s w hi l e gi vi ng in s u f f ic ie n t w e ig h t to th e o th e r s . H ernand ez G om ez has notdem on stra t ed thatany of the al l eged fac tual e rr o r s b yth e d is tr ic t c o u rt a f f e c te d h is s u b s ta n tia l r ig h ts . See U ni ted Stat es v. D al lm an , 53 3 F . 3d 75 5, 76 1-62 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). H i s other c on t ent i on of procedural e rr o ris b e lie d b yth e r e c o r d . H e rn a n d e z G o m e z n e x t c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e ly un re as on abl e. G i ven the age of H ernand ez G om ez ’ s pri or conv i ct i on and the other a s pe c t s of

hi s c r i m i na l hi s t ory , appl i c a t i on of the 16- l e ve l pr i orc onvi c t i on e n h a n c e m e n t d id n o t r e s u lt in a n u n r e a s o n ab le s e n te n c e in th is c a s e . See U ni ted State s v . V

ale nc i a- B arr agan , 60 8 F . 3d 11 03 , 11 08 -09 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). T he re cord r e f l e c t s tha tthe 70- m onth s e nt e nc e i s s ubs t a nt i ve l yr e a s onabl e i n l i ghtof the to ta lityo f

th e c ir c u m s ta n c e s a n d th e 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) f a c to r s . See G al l

v. U ni ted Stat es , 5 5 2 U .S . 3 8 , 5 1 ( 2 0 0 7 ) .10- 50037 3 I n a c c or da nc e w i th U

ni ted Stat es v. R i ve ra-San chez , 222 F . 3d 1057, 1062 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 0 ) , w e r e m a n d th e c a s e to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt w ith in s tru c tio n s th a t it d e le te f r o m th e ju d g m e n t th e r e f e r e n c e to s e c tio n 1 3 2 6 ( b ) ( 2 ) . W e d e c lin e to i nstructthe di stri ctcourtt o con form the w ri tt en j ud gm entt o the oral p r o n o u n c e m e n t o f

s e n te n c e b yd e le tin g th e p h r a s e “o ro r d in a n c e ,” b e c au s e th e r e is n o c o n f lic t b e tw e e n th e m . See U ni ted Stat es v. Hi ck

s , 99 7 F . 2d 59 4, 59 7 (9th C i r. 19 93 ) ( w ri tt en j ud gm entshou l d b e a m ended w here i ti s i ncon si st entw i th o ra l pron ou ncem ent ). A F F IR M E D ; R E M A N D E D to corre ct th e j u d gm en t.