alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**12.1** **Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
I, Fulvio Conti, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Enel S.p.A.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. As the company’s certifying officers, I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 5. As company’s certifying officers, I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors andthe audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
June 13, 2005         /s/ Fulvio Conti   Name:  Fulvio Conti   Title:  Chief Executive Officer
#### STATE v. COGDELL

No. 2 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 522.

. Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
*

The Honorable Adrian G. Duplantier, United States District Judge for the Eastern District

of Louisiana, sitting by designation.

NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION

File Name: 05a0237n.06

Filed: March 30, 2005

No. 04-5266

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

Quintin Qualls,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MARK LUTTRELL, Sheriff, in his official

capacity as Sheriff of Shelby County,

Tennessee; CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL

SERVICES; JOSEPH PONTE, in his official

capacity as Director of Shelby County Jail;

GERALD STIPANUCK, in his personal and

official capacity as a,

Defendants-Appellees.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

BEFORE: MERRITT and ROGERS, Circuit Judges; and DUPLANTIER,*

 District Judge.

MERRITT, Circuit Judge. In this prisoner civil rights case for “deliberate indifference to

plaintiff’s safety” brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the District Court dismissed the case because the

prisoner, who is complaining of spiders in his cell, failed to file a proper grievance at any step in the

grievance process. On appeal, the prisoner has dismissed all parties to this case other than Sheriff

Luttrell and Director Ponte, who were sued in their official capacities only, and who the prisoner
No. 04-5266

Qualls v. Luttrell

-2-

claims were deliberately indifferent to his welfare because they knew the Shelby County Jail had

a serious spider problem.

The two remaining defendants, Luttrell and Ponte, are named only in their official capacities

and not in their individual capacities. The suit seeks monetary damages and declaratory relief. As

to the prisoner’s claim for monetary damages, sovereign immunity bars a § 1983 suit for monetary

damages against a prison official in his official capacity. Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491

U.S. 58, 71 (1989); Jarvis v. Marcum, No. 03-5331, 2003 WL 22205080 (6th Cir. Sept. 22, 2003).

That portion of the prisoner’s suit that seeks declaratory relief is now moot because the prisoner has

been moved to another facility. 

Therefore, the District Court did not err in dismissing the complaint. Accordingly, the

judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 16-2      Filed 10/29/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 24 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 24 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 24 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 24 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 24 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 24 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 24 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 7 of 7
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1020
SCOTT C. SCHIRMACHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-95-2672-AW) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott C. Schirmacher, Appellant Pro Se. William Christopher Edgar, Jo Ann Peele, BRYAN, CAVE, MCPHEETERS & MCROBERTS, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissinghis civil diversity action alleging defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Schirmacher v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. , No. CA-95-2672-AW (D. Md. Dec. 1, 1995).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 4 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 4 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 4 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 4 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,950
<SECURITIES>                                        91
<RECEIVABLES>                                      124
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,373
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,616
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              158
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,061
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,616
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,239
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    699
<INCOME-TAX>                                       245
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                454
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       454
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07



</TABLE>
PROSKATJER ROSE LLP

Louis M. Solomon LS-7906

1585 Broadway Figueira Den. Tab

New York NY 10036-8299

Telephone 212.969.3000 137

-andBERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER ROSSMANN LLP __________________ Max W. Berger MB-SO 10

1285 Avenue of the Americas

New York NY 10019

Telephone 212554.1400

Attorneys for Lead and Named Plaintiffs and the Prospective Class

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER

LEAGUE LIMITED BOURNE CO. together 07 Civ. 3582 LLS with its affiliate MURBO MUSIC PUBLISHING

INC. CHERRY LANE MUSIC PUBLISHING AMENDED CLASS ACTION

COMPANY CAL IV ENTERTAINMENT COMPLAINT

LLC ROBERT TUR d/b/a LOS ANGELES

NEWS SERVICE NATIONAL MUSIC JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

PUBLISHERS ASSOCIATION THE

RODGERS HAMMERSTEIN

ORGANIZATION STAGE THREE MUSIC

US EDWARD B. MARKS MUSIC

COMPANY FREDDY BIENSTOCK MUSIC

COMPANY d/b/a BIENSTOCK PUBLISHING

COMPANY ALLEY MUSIC CORPORATION.

X-RAY DOG MUSIC INC. FEDERATION

FRANAISE DE TENNIS THE SCOTTISH

PREMIER LEAGUE LIMITED THE MUSIC

FORCE MEDIA GROUP LLC THE MUSIC

FORCE LLC and SIN-DROME RECORDS

LTD. on behalf of themselves and all others

simiarly situated

Plaintiffs

V.

YOUTUBE YOUTUBE LLC and

GOOGLE

Defendants.
The Scottish Premier League Limited 137-0002

33. Plaintiff The Scottish Premier League Limited SPL is the top division of

Scottish soccer. SPL is incorporated under the UK Companies Acts having registered office at

Flampden Park Glasgow 042 9DB. SPL owns the copyright and/or the relevant exclusive

rights in the following Protected Works consisting of audiovisual footage featuring coverage of

soccer matches among others

A. Aberdeen Rangers May 20 2007.

B. Aberdeen Celtic August 19 2007.

C. Rangers Aberdeen March 17 2007.

34. The SPL Works are not United States works within the meaning of the U.S.

Copyright Act and are therefore not subject to any registration requirements under U.S.

copyright law.

The Music Force

35. Plaintiffs The Music Force Media Group LLC major independent record

company organized under the laws of Tennessee The Music Force LLC highly respected

independent music publisher organized under the laws of Tennessee and Sin-Drome Records

Ltd. an indcpendent record company incorporated in California together with their affiliated

and related companies collectively The Music Force all with principal place of business at

4658 Wortser Ave. Sherman Oaks CA 91423 represent musical compositions embodied in

sound recordings which have sold in excess of 50 million units recorded by Artists such as

Alicia Keyes Neil Diamond Peter Cetera Anita Baker Tupac Shakur and Notorious B.l.G.

have received multiple Grammy nominations including Grammy award and other awards and

19
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 03, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 03, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21A0732. JEROME DAVIS v. CROWLEY MARITIME CORPORATION .
The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this Court and with Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals Rule 13. On January 22, 2021, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors and a brief no later than February 01, 2021. As of the date of this order, the appellant's enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
# C_2011339EN.01001301.xml

| 19.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/13

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 339/08

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 31.10.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 31.10.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Sweden |
| Stock or Group of stocks | POK/2A34. |
| Species | Saithe (Pollachius virens) |
| Zone | IIIa and IV; EU waters of IIa, IIIb, IIIc, and Subdivisions 22-32 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

31.10.2011

Duration

31.10.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Sweden

Stock or Group of stocks

POK/2A34.

Species

Saithe (Pollachius virens)

Pollachius virens

Zone

IIIa and IV; EU waters of IIa, IIIb, IIIc, and Subdivisions 22-32

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 99.1**ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATEBARCLAYS BANK PLCGRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 11) PLC     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Barclays Bank PLC (the “Bank”), asServicer, pursuant to the Beneficiaries Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 23, 1999 (the“Agreement”), among the Bank, as Servicer and Barclaycard Funding PLC, as Investor Beneficiary,does hereby certify that:     1. The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings asset forth in the Agreement.     2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.     3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2005 was conducted under my supervision.     4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreementthroughout such calendar year and no material default in the performance ofsuch obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in theParagraph 5 below.     5. The following is a description of each material default in the performanceof the Servicer’s obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known tothe undersigned to have been made by the Servicer during the calendar yearended December 31, 2005, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each suchdefault, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each suchdefault and (iii) the current status of each such default:None.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Annual Servicer’s Certificate this23rd day of June, 2006.           Barclays Bank PLC
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 2129 Lower Tribunal No. 201 6

- CF

- 0 11551

- A

- O

_____________________________
J AMES V ILSAINT , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County. Patricia L. Strowbridge
, Judge.

J u ne 2 5, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED

. STARGEL and MIZE, JJ., and LAMBERT, B.D., Associate Judge, c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Nicholas Martino, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Al lison Leigh Morris
, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Certification ofChairman and Chief Executive Officer, Deputy Chief Executive Officer, and CFOand COO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 20-F of National Bank of Greece S.A. (“NationalBank of Greece”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”),Takis Arapoglou, as Chairman and CEO of National Bank of Greece, IoannisPechlivanidis, as Deputy CEO, and Anthimos Thomopoulos, as CFO and COO,respectively, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                Theinformation contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of National Bank of Greece.

Dated July2, 2007
| /s/ Efstratios-Georgios (Takis) A. Arapoglou        |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Efstratios-Georgios (Takis) A. Arapoglou            |
| *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*              |
| /s/ Ioannis G.  Pechlivanidis                       |   |
| Ioannis G. Pechlivanidis                            |
| *Vice Chairman—Deputy Chief Executive Officer* |
| /s/ Anthimos Thomopoulos                            |   |
| Anthimos Thomopoulos                                |
| *Chief Financial Officer and*                       |
| *Chief Operations Officer*                          |

 

The above certificate is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure document.

----
#### STATE v. KING

No. 115.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 165.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 15 November 1977.
#### DALE v. LATTIMORE

No. 47 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 348.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 2 November 1971.
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-14 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-14 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-14 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-14 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-14 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-14 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 16-14 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 7 of 7
#### MORAN v. SLUSS

No. 19 PC.

Case below: 37 N.C. App. 232.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 October 1978.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# Date and Time:

Thursday, October 25, 2007, at 10 a.m.

# Place:

999 E Street, NW., Washington, DC (Ninth Floor).

# Status:

 This meeting will be open to the public.

# Items to be Discussed:

Correction and Approval of Minutes.

Draft Advisory Opinion 2007-20: XM Satellite Radio, Inc., by counsel, John C. Keeney, Jr.

Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Bundled Contributions.

Management and Administrative Matters.

      ( print page 59291)    

# Person to Contact for Information:

Mr. Robert Biersack, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Mary W. Dove,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-5209 Filed 10-17-07; 3:21 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-M
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 2 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 3 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 4 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 5 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 6 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 7 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 8 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 9 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 10 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 11 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 12 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 13 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 14 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 15 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 16 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 17 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 18 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 19 of 20
Case 1:07-cv-03450-AKH Document 3 Filed 07/09/2008 Page 20 of 20
#### LOVE v. MOORE

No. 158A81.

Case below: 305 N.C. 575.

Petition by Insurance Company to rehear denied 13 July 1982.