alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report of Royal Quantum  Group,  Inc. on
Form  10-KSB  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2005,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Ron
Ruskowsky,  President,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  that,  to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/    Ron Ruskowsky
--------------------
Ron Ruskowsky,
President, CEO and Principal Accounting Officer


Dated: April 12, 2006


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### HARRISON ASSOCIATES v. STATE PORTS AUTHORITY

No. 127.

Reported: 280 N.C. 251.

Petition by Harrison Associates to rehear denied 20 April 1972.
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

 

*CertificationPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002*

 

I, Adrian Walton Gower certifythat:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F ofONO Finance PLC (the “Company”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:

 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.             The Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of theCompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Adrian Walton Gower   |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |   |                      |
|   |   | Name: Adrian Walton Gower |
|   |   | Title: *Director*         |
|   |   | Date: June 30, 2005  |

 

1

----
#### STATE v. LILLY

No. 87 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 467.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S* 7A-31 denied 3 May 1977.
#### PARDUE v. PARDUE

No. 206 PC.

No. 100 (Fall Term).

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 164.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 17 August 1981.
Exhibit








AMENDMENT TO
CIENA CORPORATION 2017 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Ciena Corporation 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which increases the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan by twelve million, two hundred thousand (12,200,000) shares, was adopted by the Board of Directors of Ciena Corporation (the “Company”) on December 11, 2019, and is effective as of April 2, 2020, the date upon which the Amendment received approval of the stockholders of the Company.


The Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 4.1 and replacing it in its entirety as follows:


“4.1. Number of Shares Available for Awards.


Subject to such additional shares of Stock as shall be available for issuance under the Plan pursuant to Section 4.2, and subject to adjustment pursuant to Section 15, the maximum number of shares of Stock reserved for issuance under the Plan shall be equal to the sum of (a) twenty-one million, one hundred thousand (21,100,000) shares of Stock, plus (b) the number of shares of Stock available for future awards under the 2008 Plan as of the Effective Date, plus (c) the number of shares of Stock related to awards outstanding under the Prior Plans as of the Effective Date that thereafter terminate by expiration or forfeiture, cancellation, or otherwise without the issuance of such shares of Stock (collectively, and in the aggregate, the “Authorized Share Amount”), all of which may be granted as Incentive Stock Options. Stock issued or to be issued under the Plan shall be authorized but unissued shares, or to the extent permitted by Applicable Law, issued shares that have been reacquired by the Company.”


* * *


To record adoption of the Amendment of the Plan by the Board as of December 11, 2019, and approval of the Amendment by the stockholders on April 2, 2020, the Company has caused its authorized officer to execute this Amendment to the Plan.


	
			
	 
	Ciena Corporation

	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ David M. Rothenstein

	 
	Name:  David M. Rothenstein

	 
	Title:  Sr. VP, General Counsel and Secretary

	 
	Date:  April 2, 2020
#### STATE v. COTTEN

No. 212 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 164.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 August 1981.
# C_2011359EN.01001001.xml

| 9.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 359/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 359/10

---

Draft amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2011 — Council Position

2011/C 359/07

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic and Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (1), as last amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1081/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 (2), and in particular Article 37 thereof,

1

2

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Union's general budget for the financial year 2011 was definitively adopted on 15 December 2010 (3), |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Union's general budget for the financial year 2011 was definitively adopted on 15 December 2010 (3),

3

| (2) | On 21 November 2011, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 7 to the general budget for the financial year 2011, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 21 November 2011, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 7 to the general budget for the financial year 2011,

| (3) | Given the fact that draft amending budget No 7 for 2011 needs to be implemented within the financial year 2011 for reasons of sound financial management, it is justified to shorten the eight-weeks period laid down in Article 4 of the Protocol No 1 for the information of the National Parliaments, as well as the 10-days period for the placing of the item on the Council's provisional agenda, in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Council's Rules of procedure, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Given the fact that draft amending budget No 7 for 2011 needs to be implemented within the financial year 2011 for reasons of sound financial management, it is justified to shorten the eight-weeks period laid down in Article 4 of the Protocol No 1 for the information of the National Parliaments, as well as the 10-days period for the placing of the item on the Council's provisional agenda, in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Council's Rules of procedure,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2011 was adopted on 30 November 2011.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 30 November 2011.

For the Council

The President

J. VINCENT-ROSTOWSKI

---

(1)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1, with corrigenda in OJ L 25, 30.1.2003, p. 43 and OJ L 99, 14.4.2007, p. 18.

1

(2)  OJ L 311, 26.11.2010, p. 9.

2

(3)  OJ L 68, 15.3.2011.

3

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SHERRIE RUSSELL-BROWN,

 Plaintiff, 

CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK

v.

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, 

LEVIN COLLEGE OF LAW, and

ROBERT H. JERRY, II, in his 

individual and official capacities as 

Dean of the University of Florida, 

Levin College of Law,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

SUMMARY OF TIME RECORDS

Plaintiff Sherrie Russell-Brown, by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby files this

summary of time records for work performed in the instant action. A sealed filing of the actual time 

records is being contemporaneously filed with this summary.

Total Attorney Hours this filing: 148.75

Total Non-Attorney Hours this filing: 0

Dated this 15th day of July, 2010.

/s/ Lennox S. Hinds

Lennox S. Hinds

New York Bar No. 8196

Stevens, Hinds & White, PC 

116 West 111th Street 

New York, NY 10026-4206

(212) 864-4445

(212) 222-2680 (fax)

lawfirmshw@yahoo.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 99 Filed 07/15/10 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 1 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 2 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 3 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 4 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 5 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 6 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 7 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 8 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 9 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 10 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 11 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 12 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 13 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 14 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 15 of 16

Case 1:07-cv-03586-AKH     Document 1      Filed 05/04/2007     Page 16 of 16
EXHIBIT 32.2


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Hawksdale  Financial Visions,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for year ended  December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Thomas Stanley  Babcock,  Treasurer and Chief Financial  Officer and Director of
the Company,  certifies for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  (the  "Exchange  Act") and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: August 24, 2004                    By:  /s/ THOMAS STANLEY BABCOCK
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Thomas Stanley Babcock
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                          and Director
**EXHIBIT 10.3**

 

MODIFICATION TOPROMISSORY NOTE

 

 

WHEREAS, on January 1,1995, Lee Pharmaceuticals (“Maker”) and Lee Foundation (“Holder”) entered intoan agreement (“Note”) whereby Lee Pharmaceuticals was to pay to Lee Foundationthe sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars; and

 

WHEREAS, the partiesthereto desire to modify said Note;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, theparties modify said Note as follows:

 

1.       Thematurity date of the Note is extended from January 1, 2005, until January 1,2010.

 

2.       ThisNote may be extended for an additional five years beyond the maturity date atthe option of Lee Pharmaceuticals.

 

3.       Allother terms and conditions of the Note remain the same.

 

 
| **February 24,  2005** | ** **                                     | **RONALD  G. LEE**      |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------|-------------------------|
| Date                        | Lee Pharmaceuticals –  Ronald G. Lee      |
|                        |                                           |
|                        |                                           |
| **February 24,  2005** | ** **                                     | **MICHAEL  L. AGRESTI** |
| Date                        | Lee Pharmaceuticals –  Michael L. Agresti |

 

----
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DEE D. ATKINSON

No. 52

(Filed 12 April 1972)

Criminal Law § 135— life sentence — compliance with Supreme Court order Judgment of life imprisonment imposed by the superior court in compliance with an order of the N. C. Supreme Court is affirmed.

Justice Lake dissenting.

Appeal by defendant from *Clark, J.,*November 1971 Criminal Session, Johnston Superior Court.

*Robert A. Spence, Attorney for defendant appellant.*

*Robert Morgan, Attorney General, Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for the State of North Carolina.*

*152HUSKINS, Justice.

In *State v. Atkinson,*279 N.C. 385, 183 S.E. 2d 105, filed 7 September 1971, for the reasons therein stated, this Court remanded the cause to the Superior Court of Johnston County for the pronouncement of a life sentence pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States. On 29 November 1971, in open court, after due notice and in the presence of defendant and his counsel, Judge Clark pronounced judgment that defendant be imprisoned in the State prison for and during the term of his natural life, said sentence to commence upon the termination of a life sentence imposed at the November Session 1971 of the Superior Court of Wayne County on the charge of murder. Defendant excepted and gave notice of appeal.

The questions defendant attempts to raise on the present appeal heretofore have been decided adversely to him, and we decline to explore them again. Judge Clark’s judgment, having been entered in compliance with our decision of 7 September 1971, is

Affirmed.

Justice Lake

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons previously stated in my dissenting opinions in *State v. Hill,*279 N.C. 371, 378, 183 S.E. 2d 97, and in the present case when heretofore remanded by this Court for the entry of the judgment now affirmed. *State v. Atkinson,*279 N.C. 385, 183 S.E. 2d 105.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T ESTH ER FU CH S, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. UN I VE R S I T Y O F AR I Z ON A, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 15333 D . C. N o . 4 : 1 0 - c v - 0 0 6 0 6 - D CB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona D a vi d C . B ury , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry17, 2012 ** B e f o r e : L E A V Y , T A L L M A N , a n dC A L L A H A N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . E sther F uchs appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ctcourt ’ s orderdenyi ng her m ot i on t o r e c ons i de rthe c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng he ra c t i on unde rthe A m e r i c a ns w i th D i s abi l i t i e s A c t . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 1291. 

# FI LED JAN 24 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 15333 2 W e r e vi e w f

ora n abus e of

di s c r e t i on, Sch. D ist. N o. 1J, Mul tno m ah C ou nt y, O r. v. A Can dS , Inc. , 5 F. 3 d1 2 5 5 , 1 2 6 2 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 3 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd e n y in g F u c h s ’s m o tio n to r e c o n s id e rb e c au s e F u c h s f a ile dto s h o w g r o u n d s w a rr a n tin g r e c o n s id e r a tio n . See id. at 1 2 6 3 ( s ta tin g g r o u n d s f o rr e lie f u n d e rF e d . R . C iv . P . 6 0 ( b ) ) . W e do n otconsi der m att er s notspec i fi ca l l y and di st i nct l y r ai se d and ar gu ed in th e o p e n in g b r ie f

, n o ris s u e s r a is e df

o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. See P ad get t v. W r i ght , 58 7 F . 3d 98 3, 98 5 n . 2 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( per c uri am ) ( decl i ni ng t o con si der m a tt e r s notdi s t i nc t l ya r gue d i n the ope ni ng br i e f ) . W e a l s o do notc ons i de ra ny d o c u m e n ts a tta c h e dto F u c h s ’s b r ie f s th a t w e r e n o t p a rt o f

th e d is tr ic t c o u rt r e c o r d . See B arcam er i ca Int ’l

U SA T rust v. T yf i eld Im ps. , Inc. , 28 9 F . 3d 58 9, 59 5 (9th C i r. 20 02 ). A F F I R M E D .
Case 7:07-cv-03508-MDF Document 5 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### FARMERS BANK v. BROWN DISTRIBUTORS

No. 372PA82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 313.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 August 1982.
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 3 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 4 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 5 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 6 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 7 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 8 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 9 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 10 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 11 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 12 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 13 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 14 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 15 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 16 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 17 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 18 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 19 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 20 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 21 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 22 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 23 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 24 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 25 of 26
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-4 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 26 of 26