alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SCWC-13-0002125

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

RENE UMBERGER, MIKE NAKACHI, KA # IMI KAUPIKO, WILLIE KAUPIKO,

CONSERVATION COUNCIL FOR HAWAI # I, THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants,

vs.

DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES, STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0002125; CIVIL NO. 12-1-2625-10 JHC)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellants’ Application for

Writ of Certiorari, filed on November 10, 2016, is hereby Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0002125 20-DEC-2016 03:01 PM2 accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties

will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, December 20, 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION


I, Jesus Diaz, CFO, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Abazias, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within the Corporation, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and


<PAGE>


      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.




Date:  March 27, 2006

                              /s/ Jesus Diaz
                              ---------------------------
                              Jesus Diaz
                              CEO and CFO
Exhibit
13.1
  CERTIFICATIONS
 
 
 The
certifications set forth below are being submitted in connection with the Annual
Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.
 
 Chengyu
Fu, the Chief Executive Officer and Hua Yang, the Chief Financial Officer of
CNOOC Limited, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 1.
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Exchange Act; and
 
 2.
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CNOOC
      Limited.
 
 Date: June
26, 2008


By:
            /s/
      Chengyu FuName:
            Chengyu
      FuTitle:
            Chairman
      and Chief
                Executive
      Officer






By:
            /s/
      Hua YangName:
            Hua
      YangTitle:
            Executive
      Director,
                Executive
      Vice President and
                Chief
      Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 9) PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 9) PLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement.
 Name: Jonathon William Albright
Title: Director
Date: June 27, 2007
 - 26 -
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 17, 2022

No. 04-22-00114-CV

Chris SCHAPIRA and Patricia Benitez,

Appellants

v.

Javier SALAZAR,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-CI-08671

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On March 7, 2022, we ordered appellants to provide written proof to this court that 

either: (1) they had paid or made arrangements to pay the district clerk’s fee to prepare the 

clerk’s record; or (2) appellants are entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. On March 8, 

2022, appellant filed a sufficient response to our order. Accordingly, we retain this appeal on our 

docket.

 The clerk’s record was filed on March 10, 2022, and the reporter’s record was filed on 

March 14, 2022. Because this is an accelerated appeal, appellants’ brief is therefore due by April 

4, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(2).

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of March, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

        Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2001.

      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In connection with the Annual Report of Parentech, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott Landow, Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2001, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated:  March 30, 2004

                                    /s/ Scott Landow
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Scott Landow, Chief Accounting Officer
Exhibit 23.1 

 

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the (i) Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-91737, 333-34552, 333-45486, 333-49842, 333-52012,333-65192 and 333-82864) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan, 1999 Director Option Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, 2000 Supplemental Stock Option Plan and Written Compensation Agreements of Blue Coat Systems,Inc.; the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan of Spring Bank Networks, Inc.; and the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan and 2000 Equity Incentive Plan of Entera, Inc. and (ii) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-55744) and related Prospectus of Blue CoatSystems, Inc. of our report dated May 22, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Blue Coat Systems, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended April 30, 2003. 

 

/s/    ERNST &YOUNG LLP 

Walnut Creek, California 

July  23, 2003
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 144 Filed 09/13/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 144 Filed 09/13/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China  Entertainment  Group,  Inc. ("the
Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period  ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof ("the  Report"),  I,
Tang Chien  Chang,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Tang Chien Chang
---------------------------
Tang Chien Chang
Chief Executive Officer

Dated: January 13, 2006
#### STATE v. BERTHA PRUITT.

(Filed 18 March 1964.)

Appeal by defendant from *Clarkson, J.,*October 28, 1963 Regular Criminal Session of Mecklenburg.

Criminal action. The indictment charges defendant with the murder of one Willie James Nelson. The State did not seek a conviction of murder in the first degree. The jury returned a verdict of guilty of murder in the second degree. From judgment thereon imposing a prison sentence, defendant appeals.

*Attorney General Bruton and Deputy Attorney General McGalliard for the State.*

*Bailey & Booe and William L. Stagg for defendant.*

Per Curiam.

Defendant admits that she shot deceased with a pistol, but contends that in so doing she was acting in the proper defense of her person, that deceased was assulting her with a knife while they were in an automobile and she had no means of safe retreat.

Defendant excepts to portions of the judge’s charge, particularly to certain' instructions relating to defendant’s plea of self-defense. The challenged instructions involve no novel or unusual applications of law. When considered in context and in the light of the evidence they do not constitute prejudicial error and could not have misled the jury. The instructions are in substantial accord with the repeated pronouncements of this Court. *State v. Washington,*234 N.C. 531, 67 S.E. 2d 498, and authorities therein cited.

No error.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 3 11

- C V

Style: Brandy Brenay Charles and Ronald Dwayne Whitfield v. Texas

Department of Family and Protective Services

Date motion s filed * : June 2 1 , 201 8 and June 22, 2018

Type of motion s : Emergency Motion s t o Abate for Disqualification of Trial Judge,

Appointment of Counsel, and Hearings on Motions for New Trial and

for Order t o District Clerk to Discipline Deputy Clerks ; Motions to

Remand and for Appropriate Orders

Part y filing motion s : Pro se A ppell ant s Brandy Brenay Charles and Ronald Dwayne

Whitfield

Document to be filed: Response to Appell ant Whitfield’ s Emergency Motion s t o Abate

Ordered that motion i s:

 Granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: After counsel filed a notice of appearance for appellant Brandy Brenay

Charles in this Court on June 6, 2018, she is not entitled to hybrid representation and,

thus, her motions are dismissed as moot

. See, e.g.

, In r e D.W. , 445 S.W.3d 913, 915

n.1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas 2014, pet. denied) (declining to consider pro se brief filed by

mother in termination case after her counsel had filed brief). T he Court requests a

response from the appell ee to the pro se appellant Whitfield’s motion s t o abate and to

remand and for appropriate orders

. T he response , if any, should be filed by July 9, 2018

, the curr e nt deadline for appellee’s response to appellant’s other motion s. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2, 10.3(a)

.

_____________________________________________ ___

Judge’ s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley



Date: June 2 6 , 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

            <S>          <C>
<ARTICLE>   5
<S>                                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE> 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                            AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                              OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                                         299099
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   58665
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               357764
<PP&E>                                                        3292622
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  85356
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                3750536
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          197982
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                      1879898
<OTHER-SE>                                                     789269
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  3750536
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               117174
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  204911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               4609
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                (73567)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    21042
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            (52525)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   (52525)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (6.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (6.59)


</TABLE>
Case 1:05-cv-05251-MBM Document 8 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 1 of 5Case 1:05-cv-05251-MBM Document 8 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 2 of 5Case 1:05-cv-05251-MBM Document 8 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 3 of 5Case 1:05-cv-05251-MBM Document 8 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 4 of 5Case 1:05-cv-05251-MBM Document 8 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 5 of 5
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2331

JOHNNIE BAILEY, Petitioner, versusDIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAM; ROBERT COAL COMPANY; OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (97-1626-BLA) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 23, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnnie Bailey, Petitioner Pro Se. Christian P. Barber, Sarah Marie Hurley, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C.;Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus, ARTER & HADDEN, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Johnnie Bailey seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1998). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Bailey v. DOWCP , No. 97-1626-BLA (B.R.B. June 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JAMES ARTHUR JONES, SR, MARY ANN JONES, OZIAH CARSON JONES, SHANTELL

SHAMEA JONES, KEVIN KENNEDY, MURIELLE KELLY KENNEDY, SANDRA WATTS

KENNEDY, FARINDA OSTEEN, MARIA PARSONS, MICHAEL PARSONS, AARON

JONES STEPHENSON, CARLOS UDAE STEPHENSON,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00071-MP -GRJ

BEAZER EAST INC, KOPPERS INC, et al

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 42, Report of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. 

Defendants have until November 19, 2010 to file their response to the First Amended Complaint

and to the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Class Certification. Upon

consideration, the Court hereby approves of and adopts the report as submitted by the parties. 

Discovery timelines as described in the Report, Doc. 42, shall not begin to run until Defendant

Answers a complaint. As such, there are currently no deadlines to set. 

When an Answer is filed, the Clerk is directed then to set a hearing to determine when

the discovery deadlines will fall. The date of the pre-trial conference will be set at the close of

discovery, and the date of trial will be set at the pre-trial conference. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of November, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00071-MP -GRJ Document 43 Filed 11/09/10 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0336. JOHN TIMOTHY MONS v. THE STATE.

In July 2019, John Timothy Mons pled guilty to two counts of smash and grab

burglary and one count of attempt to commit smash and grab burglary. In August

2019, Monsfiled, through counsel, a motion to withdraw guilty plea. On February 14,

2020, the trial court issued an order stating that Mons, through counsel, withdrew the

motion to withdraw guilty plea. Mons then filed a pro se notice of appeal of that

order. We lack jurisdiction.

“A criminal defendant in Georgia does not have the right to represent himself

and also be represented by an attorney, and pro se filings by represented parties are

therefore unauthorized and without effect.” Tolbert v. Toole, 296 Ga. 357, 363 (3)

(767 SE2d 24) (2014) (punctuation omitted); accord White v. State, 302 Ga. 315, 319

(2) (806 SE2d 489) (2017) (the defendant’s pro se motions to withdraw his guilty

pleas were legal nullities because he was represented by counsel when he made

them). “A formal withdrawal of counsel cannot be accomplished until after the trial

court issues an order permitting the withdrawal. Untilsuch an order properly is made

and entered, no formal withdrawal can occur and counsel remains counsel of record.”

Tolbert, 296 Ga. at 362 (3) (punctuation omitted). 

October 13, 2020
Here, the record contains no indication that the trial court has relieved Mons’s

counsel of hisrepresentation. Consequently, Mons’s pro se notice of appeal is a legal

nullity, and this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Tolbert,

296 Ga. at 362-363 (3). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/13/2020
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Patricia S. Morris, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of VA Software Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of VA Software Corporation.  

| Date:  October 16, 2006 | By:    | /s/ PATRICIA   S. MORRIS                            |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   |                                                     |
|                         | Name:  | Patricia S.   Morris                                |
|                         | Title: | Chief   Financial Officer and Senior Vice President |