alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2011266EN.01001801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 9.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/18 |

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 800/2008 declaring certain categories of aid compatible with the common market in application of Articles 87 and 88 of the Treaty (General Block Exemption Regulation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 266/02

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reference number of the State Aid | SA.28361 (X 430/09) | |
| Member State | Italy | |
| Member State reference number | — | |
| Name of the Region (NUTS) | TRENTO Article 107(3)(c) | |
| Granting authority | | | | --- | | PROVINCIA AUTONOMA DI TRENTO — DIPARTIMENTO AGRICOLTURA E ALIMENTAZIONE | | Via G.B. Trener 3 | | 38100 TRENTO | | ITALY | | www.trentinoagricoltura.it | | www.provincia.tn.it | | |
| Title of the aid measure | Legge provinciale 28 marzo 2003, n. 4 e s.m.i., recante norme per il «Sostegno dell'economia agricola, disciplina dell'agricoltura biologica e della contrassegnazione di prodotti geneticamente non modificati»: approvazione dei criteri e delle moda ... | |
| National legal basis (Reference to the relevant national official publication) | | | | | --- | --- | | — | l.p. 28 marzo 2003, n. 4: articoli 25, 28, 42, 44 e 46, comma 1; | | | | | --- | --- | | — | deliberazione edlla Giunta provinciale n. 609 del 20 marzo 2009. | | |
| Type of measure | Scheme | |
| Amendment of an existing aid measure | — | |
| Duration | 1.1.2008—31.12.2013 | |
| Economic sector(s) concerned | Support activities for crop production, Support activities for animal production | |
| Type of beneficiary | SME | |
| Annual overall amount of the budget planned under the scheme | EUR 15,00 (in millions) | |
| For guarantees | — | |
| Aid Instrument (Article 5) | Direct grant | |
| Reference to the Commission Decision | — | |
| If co-financed by Community funds | — | |
| Objectives | Maximum aid intensity in % or Maximum aid amount in national currency | SME-bonuses in % |
| SME investment and employment aid (Art.15) | 40 % | — |

Web link to the full text of the aid measure:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | http://www.consiglio.provincia.tn.it/banche\_dati.it.asp |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | http://www.delibere.provincia.tn.it/ |

---
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70918-70919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23259]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[STB Ex Parte No. 552 (Sub-No. 9)]


Railroad Revenue Adequacy--2004 Determination

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 23, 2005, the Board served a decision announcing 
the 2004 revenue adequacy determinations for the Nation's Class I 
railroads. One carrier, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, is found to 
be revenue adequate.

DATES: Effective Date: This decision is effective November 23, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leonard J. Blistein, (202) 565-1529. 
(Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: 1 
(800) 877-8339).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board is required to make an annual 
determination of railroad revenue adequacy. A railroad is considered 
revenue adequate under 49 U.S.C. 10704(a) if it achieves a rate of 
return on net investment equal to at least the current cost of capital 
for the railroad industry for 2004, determined to be 10.1% in Railroad 
Cost of Capital--2004, STB Ex Parte No. 558 (Sub-No. 8) (STB served 
June 30, 2005). This revenue adequacy standard was applied to each 
Class I railroad, and one carrier was found to be revenue adequate for 
2004.
    The Board's decision is posted on the Board's Web site, http://www.stb.dot.gov. In addition, copies of the decision may be purchased 
from ASAP Document Solutions by calling 202-306-4004 (assistance for 
the hearing impaired is available through FIRS at 1-800-877-8339), or 
by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eb8a988a9b8f88ab9d8e9982918485c5858e9f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4c5d7c5d4c0c7e4d2c1d6cddecbca8acac1d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

Environmental and Energy Considerations

    This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the 
human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 603(b), we conclude that our action in this 
proceeding will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. The purpose and effect of the action is 
merely to update the annual railroad industry revenue adequacy finding. 
No new reporting or other regulatory requirements are imposed, directly 
or indirectly, on small entities.

    Decided: November 17, 2005.


[[Page 70919]]


    By the Board, Chairman Nober, Vice Chairman Buttrey, and 
Commissioner Mulvey.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-23259 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FLN (Rev. 3/2007) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

3:01cr32LAC - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. STEVEN DUNKLIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs

STEVEN DUNKLIN

Case No.3:01cr32LAC

ORDER

Your document, MOTION TO PROCEED WITH PENDING LITIGATION, TO WIT

SUPERVISED RELEASE VIOLATION, AMEND AND OR TRUST, was referred to the

undersigned with the following deficiencies:

The document does not have a Certificate of Service as required by Rule

5(b) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, showing proper

service.

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall return the document to the

filing party.

DONE and ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2007.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:01-cr-00032-LC-MD Document 332 Filed 09/17/07 Page 1 of 1
FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 2/5/2015 3:22:32 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
# C_2011199EN.01001401.xml

| 7.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/14

---

Corrigendum to Commission opinion concerning a notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 146 of 17 May 2011
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 146 of 17 May 2011

2011/C 199/10

As regards the title of the act,

for:

read:

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00259-CR

Ex parte Rhonda Lee Glover

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 167TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 3041561, HONORABLE MICHAEL LYNCH, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

At a hearing in the district court, appellant and her retained counsel stated that she

did not desire to pursue this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b)(2). The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Patterson and Puryear

Dismissed

Filed: October 18, 2005

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.                                                 Page No.

 3         Articles of Incorporation as amended April 17,   16
           1997

 4.1       Form of Distribution Agreement by and between    Incorporated
           Morgan Stanley & Co., Incorporated, J. P. Morgan by Reference
           Securities, Inc. and Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc.      to Exhibit
           relating to the sale from time to time by        (4)-2(a) to
           Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc. of up to $150,000,000     Form 8-K filed
           aggregate principle amount of medium-term notes  on April 25,
           due nine months or more from date of issue.      1997

 4.2       Form of Fixed Rate Notes                         Incorporated
                                                            by Reference
                                                            to Exhibit 
                                                            (4)-1(a) to 
                                                            Form 8-K filed
                                                            April 25, 1997

 4.3       Form of Floating Rate Notes                      Incorporated
                                                            by Reference
                                                            to Exhibit 
                                                            (4)-1(b) to
                                                            Form 8-K filed
                                                            April 25, 1997

 4.4       First Supplemental Indenture dated as of         Incorporated
           April 17, 1997, between Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc.   by Reference
           (formerly TRINOVA Corporation) and the First     to Exhibit 
           National Bank of Chicago (as successor in        (4)-2(b) to
           interest to NBD Bank), as Trustee                Form 8-K filed
                                                            April 25, 1997

 (11)      Statement re:  Computation of Per Share Earnings 32

 (12)      Statement re:  Computation of Ratios             33

 (27)      Financial Data Schedule                          34


                                   -15-
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 203 (Monday, October 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 59549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5189]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (NCGMP) Advisory 
Committee

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 106-148, the NCGMP Advisory Committee 
will meet in Room 1787 of Building 25 at the Federal Center, Denver, 
CO.
    The advisory Committee, composed of scientists from Federal 
Agencies, State Agencies, academic institutions, and private companies, 
will advise the Director of the U.S. Geological Survey on planning and 
implementation of the geologic mapping program.
    Topics to be reviewed and discussed by the Advisory Committee 
include the:
    <bullet> Progress of the NCGMP towards fulfilling the purposes of 
the National Geological Mapping Act of 1993
    <bullet> Updates on the Federal, State, and educational components 
of the NCGMP
    <bullet> Report from the Subcommittee on an implementation plan for 
the National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program

DATES: November 1-2, 2007 commencing at 8:30 a.m. on November 1 and 
adjourning by 5 p.m. on November 2.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel M. Bybell, U.S. Geological 
Survey, 908 National Center, Reston, Virginia 20192 (703) 648-5281.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings of the National Cooperative 
Geological Mapping Program Advisory Committee are open to the Public.

    Dated: October 16, 2007.
William H. Werkheiser,
Acting Associate Director for Geology, U.S. Geological Survey.
[FR Doc. 07-5189 Filed 10-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311-AM-M
#### STATE v. THOMAS

No. 12 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 594.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 March 1978.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Dean Weber, the Chief Executive Officer of One Voice Technologies,
Inc.,, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of One Voice Technologies,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
         material information relating to the registrant, including its
         consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
         entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
         being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
         designed under our supervision, as of the end of the period covered by
         this report (based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
         registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal
         quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
         or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):


         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.



April 1, 2005

/s/ Dean Weber
--------------
Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TERRANCE ALLEN BARGNARE,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv57/WS/EMT

KATINA M. PATRICK,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court upon referral from the clerk. Plaintiff commenced this action

by filing a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1). On March 12, 2010, this court

entered an order giving Plaintiff thirty (30) days in which to pay the initial partial filing fee in the

amount of $22.50 (Doc. 5). Plaintiff failed to respond to the order; therefore, on April 16, 2010, the

court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty (20) days, why this action

should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court (Doc. 6). The time for

compliance with the show cause order has now elapsed and Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial

filing fee or shown cause for his failure to do so.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with an

order of the court.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 11th day of May 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope of appellate review of

factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11th Cir.

1988).

Case No: 3:10cv57/WS/EMT
|    |                                                                                                                       |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                      |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Dated:   May 5, 2011 | /s/DONALD H. NONNENKAMP |
|   |   | Donald H. Nonnenkamp |
|   |   | Vice President, |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 5:10cr31-RH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 5:10cr31-RH

LEONARD TERRANCE PHILLIPS,

Defendant.

___________________________________/

ORDER DENYING EARLY TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

The defendant Leonard Terrance Phillips has submitted a letter asking for 

early termination of his supervised release. He has not shown that the purposes of 

supervision have been satisfied or that further supervision would serve no purpose. 

He has not shown that early termination is warranted by his conduct and the 

interest of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The defendant’s letter, ECF No. 38, is treated as a motion for early 

termination of supervised release. The motion is DENIED.

SO ORDERED on August 21, 2015.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:10-cr-00031-RH Document 39 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 1
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2147 

To double the existing penalties for the provision of misleading or inaccurate 

caller identification information, and to extend the statute of limitations 

for forfeiture penalties for persons who commit such violations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2019 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. HAWLEY, Mr. PETERS, Ms. 

MCSALLY, and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To double the existing penalties for the provision of misleading or inaccurate caller identification information, 

and to extend the statute of limitations for forfeiture 

penalties for persons who commit such violations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anti-Spoofing Pen5 alties Modernization Act of 2019’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2147 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASING PENALTIES AND EXTENDING STATUTE 

2 OF LIMITATIONS FOR SPOOFERS. 

3 (a) INCREASING PENALTIES.—Section 227(e)(5) of 

4 the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(e)(5)) 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (A)(i)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘$20,000’’; and 

9 (B) by striking ‘‘$1,000,000’’ and insert10 ing ‘‘$2,000,000’’; and 

11 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$10,000’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘$20,000’’. 

13 (b) EXTENDING STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.—Clause 

14 (iv) of section 227(e)(5)(A) of the Communications Act 

15 of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 227(e)(5)(A)) is amended— 

16 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘2-YEAR’’ and 

17 inserting ‘‘3-YEAR’’; and 

18 (2) by striking ‘‘2 years’’ and inserting ‘‘3 

19 years’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

              Information Regarding Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"),
provides that if part of a registration statement at the time it becomes
effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact, or omits a material
fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein
not misleading, any person acquiring a security pursuant to such registration
statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person
knew of such untruth or omission) may assert a claim against, among others, an
accountant who has consented to be named as having certified any part of the
registration statement or as having prepared any report for use in connection
with the registration statement.

IVAX Diagnostics, Inc. dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") as its
independent auditors, effective June 21, 2002. For additional information, see
IVAX Diagnostics' Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 21, 2002. After
reasonable efforts, IVAX Diagnostics has been unable to obtain Andersen's
written consent to the incorporation by reference into IVAX Diagnostics'
previously filed registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-75854 and
333-48316) and the related prospectuses (the "Registration Statements") of
Andersen's audit report with respect to IVAX Diagnostics' consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2001 and for the two years in the period then
ended. Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits
IVAX Diagnostics to file this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated
by reference into the Registration Statements, without a written consent from
Andersen. As a result, with respect to transactions in securities of IVAX
Diagnostics pursuant to the Registration Statements that occur subsequent to the
date this Annual Report on Form 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the
Securities Act for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the
financial statements audited by Andersen or any omissions of a material fact
required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a
claim against Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.