alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of Neoforma, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003 as filed with the SEC on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew L. Guggenhime, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    March 10, 2004 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    ANDREW L. GUGGENHIME                                               
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Andrew L. Guggenhime Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 230 (Thursday, December 1, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 72121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Agency Meeting; Sunshine Act

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors will meet in open session at 
2:30 p.m. on Monday, December 5, 2005, to consider the following 
matters:
    Summary Agenda: No substantive discussion of the following items is 
anticipated. These matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a 
member of the Board of Directors requests that an item be moved to the 
discussion agenda.
    Summary reports, status reports, and reports of actions taken 
pursuant to authority delegated by the Board of Directors.
    Discussion Agenda:

Memorandum and resolution re: Proposed 2006 Corporate Operating Budget.
Memorandum and resolution re: Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on 
Large-Bank Deposit Insurance Determination Modernization Proposal.
Memorandum and resolution re: Notice and Request for Public Comment 
Pursuant to the Economic Growth and Regulatory Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1996.
    The meeting will be held in the Board Room on the sixth floor of 
the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.
    The FDIC will provide attendees with auxiliary aids (e.g., sign 
language interpretation) required for this meeting. Those attendees 
needing such assistance should call (202) 416-2089 (Voice); or (202) 
416-2007 (TTY), to make necessary arrangements.
    Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be 
directed to Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Executive Secretary of the 
Corporation, at (202) 898-7122.

    Dated: November 28, 2005.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-23560 Filed 11-29-05; 12:03 pm]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-M
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Byron Cox, Chief Financial Officer of Fairchild International Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(i)	the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Byron Cox
________________________________
Byron Cox
Secretary, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
April 15, 2004





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for 18 October 2007, at 10 a.m. in the Commission's offices at the National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include buildings, parks and memorials.

                    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission are available on our Web site:                     *http://www.cfa.gov*. Inquiries regarding the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address, or call 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.                

Dated in Washington DC September 27, 2007.

Frederick J. Lindstrom,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-4879 Filed 10-2-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ALLISON BONANNO,

Plaintiff,

v. 5:10cv25/SPM/MD

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a complaint for judicial review of an adverse administrative

decision of the defendant and has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc.

6). It affirmatively appears that leave to proceed in forma pauperis should be

granted. However, before service can be directed, plaintiff must submit service

copies of her complaint.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 6) is granted and this case

may be filed and the pleadings may be served without the prepayment of costs to the

plaintiff as provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

2. Plaintiff shall submit three services copies of her complaint within 14

days.

3. Upon receipt of the copies of the complaint, the clerk of court is

directed to send three certified copies of this order, the service copies of the

complaint, and the prepared USM 285 forms to the United States Marshal. 

4. The United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the complaint and

summons upon Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, the Attorney
Page 2 of 2

General of the United States, and the office of the United States Attorney for this

District by certified mail. 

5. After a response to the complaint has been filed by the defendant, the

plaintiff shall be required to mail to the attorney for the defendant a copy of every

pleading or other paper, including letters, submitted for consideration by the court. 

The plaintiff shall include with the original paper to be filed with the clerk of court

a certificate stating the date a correct copy of the paper was mailed to each

defendant or to the attorney representing each defendant. Any paper submitted for

filing after a response to the complaint has been filed by the defendants which does

not contain a certificate of service shall be returned by the clerk and disregarded by

the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3 day of March, 2010. rd

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 5:10cv25/SPM/MD
October 27, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

S.L.A. STUDIO LAND, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-10-01129-CV V.

SRC CONSTRUCTION, INC. AND SALVATORE R. CARABETTA, Appellees

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the orders on the special appearances in favor of 

appellees, SRC CONSTRUCTION, INC. AND SALVATORE R. CARABETTA, signed 

August 12, 2010, which was made final by the severance order signed February 21, 2011, 

was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error 

in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, S.L.A. STUDIO LAND, INC., to pay all costs incurred in this 

appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
SHIRE LLC, 

Plaintiff, 

Y. 

Xi UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTFUCT OF NEW YOR 

TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL 

INDUSTRIES LTD. and TEVA : RETURN DATE: 

PHARMACEUTIICALS USA, INC., : Nov. 29,2007 at 9:00 a.m. 

USDC SDNY 

WCUMENT 

~~oNIFILED 

Defendant. 

TEVA USA's VOLUNTARY MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUI' PREJUDICE 

Under Rule 41(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants Teva 

Pharnlaceuticals USA. Inc. ("Teva USA"), through its undersigned attorneys, voluntarily 

moves to dismiss without prejudice Counterclaim 11, which is a claim for Declaration of NonInfringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,192,013 ("the '013 patent"). 'l'eva USA bases this motion 

for voluntary dismissal upon the representations that Plaintiff Shire LLC ("Shire") has made 

to Teva USA, in which Shire coveliarlls not to sue Teva USA on the '013 patent. See 

Attachment A, Covenant-Not-Sue, dated November 6, 2007 

Dated: New York, New York 

November 6, 2007 

345 Park Knue 

New York, NY 101 54 

' 1 MA-, :dJ %& &~t~~~diiornw,ior ~e,iendani, : Tevu Pharmaceuticuls USA. Inc. 

Case 1:07-cv-03526-MGC Document 16 Filed 12/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

IH/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS MATA-ALVARADO, aka

Juan Lopez-Alvarado,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74029

Agency No. A076-709-351

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 16, 2010** 

Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Jose Luis Mata-Alvarado, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

FILED

APR 01 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
IH/Research 2 07-74029

immigration judge’s decision granting the government’s motion to terminate

removal proceedings. We dismiss the petition for review. 

Because an order terminating removal proceedings is not an order of

removal, we lack jurisdiction over Mata-Alvarado’s petition for review. Alcala v.

Holder, 563 F.3d 1009, 1013 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

m 02-30338

_______________

SYLVESTER BLAZE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE

AND

JOHN E. POTTER,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

(m 00-CV-2165)

_________________________

August 28, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, 

and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Sylvester Blaze appeals a summary judgment in this action claiming race discrimination. His brief is almost unintelligible, but he

claims he was treated differently from white

employees when he was fired by the United

StatesPostalService afterstriking another employee. We affirm, essentially for the reasons

given by the district court in its comprehensive

Memorandum Ruling entered on February 28,

2002.

The judgment is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is

not precedent except under the limited circumstances

set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Case 7:07-cv-03509-SCR-LMS Document 4 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03509-SCR-LMS Document 4 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03509-SCR-LMS Document 4 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03509-SCR-LMS Document 4 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 7:07-cv-03509-SCR-LMS Document 4 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 5 of 5
# C_2011306EN.01000901.xml

| 18.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/9

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 306/08

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 13.8.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 13.8.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Belgium |
| Stock or Group of stocks | LEZ/8ABDE. |
| Species | Megrims (Lepidorhombus spp.) |
| Zone | VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | 870462 |

Date and time of closure

13.8.2011

Duration

13.8.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Belgium

Stock or Group of stocks

LEZ/8ABDE.

Species

Megrims (Lepidorhombus spp.)

Lepidorhombus

Zone

VIIIa, VIIIb, VIIId and VIIIe

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

870462

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
Page 1 of 2

 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

THE BARTRAM, LLC,

a Delaware limited liability company,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-28-SPM-GRJ

LANDMARK AMERICAN INSURANCE 

COMPANY, an Oklahoma corporation, 

ROCKHILL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

an Arizona corporation, 

and WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Georgia

corporation,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

The matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion To Compel Documents. 

(Doc. 85.) In their motion Defendants request an order compelling Plaintiff to produce

documents that Plaintiff claims are privileged because Plaintiff’s failed to provide

Defendants with a privilege log as required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(A). In

“Defendants’ Supplemental To Its Motion To Compel Document” Defendants now

advise the Court that the parties have agreed to allow the Plaintiff through May 9, 2011

to serve a privilege log under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(A). (Doc. 86.) 

Because the parties have stipulated to a May 9, 2011 deadline for Plaintiff to

serve a privilege log Defendant’s motion is due to be DENIED as moot.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ Motion To Compel Documents (Doc. 85) is DENIED as
Page 2 of 2

moot.

2. Plaintiff shall provide Defendants with a privilege log in the form provided

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(A) on or before May 9, 2011. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 14 day of April, 2011. th

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case No: 1:10-cv-28-SPM -GRJ
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 of the SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report.
   /s/ James J. AbelJames J. AbelExecutive Vice President, Secretary,Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DEVON MARESCA

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv47/RS-AK

MARELA, LLC, d/b/a

JIM’S BUFFET AND GRILL, Inc.,

and MARIA ANDROMIDAS,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s notice of settlement (Doc. 30). Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 

16.2(D), IT IS ORDERED:

1. This case is dismissed from the active docket of the court.

2. In the event that the settlement between these parties is not consummated, the 

Court reserves jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days 

of the date of this Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and 

reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file for administrative purposes, and upon the 

expiration of 60 days without activity, the clerk is directed to close the case in 

its entirety for all purposes.

ORDERED on October 1, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-1083

LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee, and EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:97-cv-01969-WDQ) Submitted: August 21, 2008 Decided: August 25, 2008 Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael N. Russo, Jr., COUNCIL, BARADEL, KOSMERL & NOLAN, PA, Annapolis, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to reopen a civil action and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wilder v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp. , No. 1:97-cv-01969-WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 4, 2007; Dec. 18, 2007). Wilder’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

**WRITTENSTATEMENT**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350**

 

 

The undersigned,RONALD G. LEE, the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, of LEEPHARMACEUTICALS (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, herebycertifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(i) the FORM 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2004(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | FEBRUARY 11, 2005 |   |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|--------|
|   |              |
|   |              |
|   |              |
|   | RONALD G. LEE     |   |
|   | Ronald G. Lee     |

 

----
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 40 50

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Jo se Barr on ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPeti ti on er

v. Eric H. Hold er, J r., Att or ne y Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lResp on de nt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ardof I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Aug us t 2 8, 2 01 3 Fi le d: Sep te m

be r 3, 2 01 3 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, BOW MAN, an d S HEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Mex ic an ci ti zen Jo s e B a r r o n pe ti ti on s fo r rev ie w o f an or de r of th e Bo ard of Im m ig rat io n App eal s (BIA), whi ch up he ld an imm ig rat io n jud ge ’s de ci si on de nyin g hi m as y lu m an d with ho ld in g of rem ov al

. Afte r car efu l re vi ew, we fin d no ba si s for gr an ti ng th e pe ti ti on , as th e BIA’s de ni al of rel ie f was su pp or te d b y su bs ta nt ia l
ev id en ce on th e reco rd as a who le

. See Cu bi ll os v. Hol de r, 56 5 F.3 d 10 54 , 10 56 -5 8(8 th Ci r. 20 09 ) ( s u b s t an ti al -ev id en ce st an da rd fo r as y lu m cl ai m ; de ni al of as y lu m

di ct at es same ou tc om e o n wi th ho ld in g- of -rem ov al cl ai m ba se d on same un de rlyin g fact ua l al le ga ti on s)

. Acco rd in gl y , w e d e n y t he pe ti ti on fo r rev ie w. See 8t h Ci r. R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
#### FAYNE v. FIELDCREST MILLS, INC.

No. 111 PC.

Case below: 54 N.C. App. 144.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 12 January 1982.
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1
 COMPANYS OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 3) PLC
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the Issuer;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the Issuer; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of Notes for the period between January 1, 2005 and the end of
the Issuers fiscal year on December 31, 2005.
   By:
    
    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName: Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:   Director
 - 29 -