alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            4,987
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    25,030
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                     120,389
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                158,144
<PP&E>                                          205,524
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                1,038,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           267,233
<BONDS>                                           7,782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (149,356)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  1,038,084
<SALES>                                         418,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                418,625
<CGS>                                           232,539
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   232,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                204,888
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               26,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (71,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (25,207)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (46,231)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (5,462)
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (51,783)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (51,783)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        

</TABLE>
#### STATE v. KNIGHT

No. 477P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 240.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1982.
# C_2011094EN.01001901.xml

| 26.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/19

---

Publication concerning Anglo Irish Bank pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions

2011/C 94/12

The High Court of Ireland

The High Court of Ireland

IN THE MATTER OF ANGLO IRISH BANK CORPORATION LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CREDIT INSTITUTIONS (STABILISATION) ACT 2010 (‘THE ACT’)

IN THE MATTER OF ANGLO IRISH BANK CORPORATION LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CREDIT INSTITUTIONS (STABILISATION) ACT 2010 (‘THE ACT’)

The High Court of Ireland did on 8 day of February 2011 make a direction order, inter alia, directing, pursuant to Section 9 of the Act:

| 1. | Anglo Irish Bank Corporation Limited (‘Anglo’) to take certain steps in connection with an auction process to be operated by the National Treasury Management Agency in respect of the transfer of certain of Anglo’s deposits and assets with immediate effect; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Anglo Irish Bank Corporation Limited (‘Anglo’) to take certain steps in connection with an auction process to be operated by the National Treasury Management Agency in respect of the transfer of certain of Anglo’s deposits and assets with immediate effect;

| 2. | Anglo to take certain procedural steps (and to procure that its affiliated companies do likewise) pursuant to the Joint EC Restructuring and Work-Out Plan for Anglo and Irish Nationwide Building Society submitted on 31 January 2011 to the European Commission including any variations thereof as directed and approved by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Anglo to take certain procedural steps (and to procure that its affiliated companies do likewise) pursuant to the Joint EC Restructuring and Work-Out Plan for Anglo and Irish Nationwide Building Society submitted on 31 January 2011 to the European Commission including any variations thereof as directed and approved by the European Commission.

And the Court did declare the direction order a reorganisation measure for the purposes of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001.

Pursuant to Section 11 of the Act, an application may be made to the High Court of Ireland, at the Four Courts, Inns Quay, Dublin 7, Ireland, by motion on notice grounded on affidavit, not later than five working days after the making of the direction order, for the setting aside of the direction order on the conditions set out therein.

Pursuant to Section 64(2) of the Act, no appeal lies from the direction order to the Supreme Court without leave of the High Court.

Full copies of the order are available from the Central Office of the High Court by e-mail to: listroomhighcourt@courts.ie

---
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                ------------



                 K-V PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gerald R. Mitchell, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
         of the Company.



/s/ Gerald R. Mitchell
-----------------------------------------------------
Gerald R. Mitchell
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
February 13, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Kevin Cook v. Monaghan Medical Corporation

Appellate case number: 01-19-00121-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-68279

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Kevin Cook, has filed a notice of the appeal of the trial court’s final 

judgment, signed on January 18, 2019. Appellant also has filed a motion to extend the 

time to file his appellant’s brief.

A clerk’s record was filed in this appeal on June 4, 2019. However, a reporter’s 

record has not been filed.1 Because the appellate record is not yet complete, appellant’s

brief is not yet due. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1 (providing appellate record consists of 

clerk’s record and, if necessary to appeal, reporter’s record); 38.6 (providing date to file 

appellant’s brief is later of date clerk’s record or reporter’s record is filed). Accordingly, 

appellant’s motion to extend time is dismissed as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __July 9, 2019__

 

1 On June 5, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the court reporter had not 

filed a reporter’s record because appellant had not requested preparation of a reporter’s 

record and had not paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparation of the 

record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). The Clerk also notified appellant that unless he 

provided proof that he had paid, or made arrangements to pay, for the reporter’s record, 

or is entitled to proceed without payment of costs by July 5, 2019, the Court might 

consider the appeal without a reporter’s record.
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

December 05, 2008

Mr. David R. Walker

Royston, Rayzor, Vickery & Williams, L.L.P.

Penzoil Place, Suite 500

711 Louisiana, 

Houston, TX 77002

Honorable Tracy K. Christopher

295th District Court

201 Caroline, 14th Floor

Houston, TX 77002

Mr. John Milton Black

Heard, Robins, Cloud & Lubel L.L.P.

3800 Buffalo Speedway 5th Floor

Houston, TX 77098

RE:Case Number:  07-0040

Court of Appeals Number:  14-06-00625-CV

Trial Court Number:  2003-30221

Style:IN RE  GLOBALSANTAFE CORPORATION

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 07-0040Page 1**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

                    Section 30.13 of the Department of Health and Human Services' claims collection regulations (45 CFR Part 30) provides that the Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest as fixed by the Secretary of the Treasury after taking into consideration private consumer rates of interest prevailing on the date that HHS becomes entitled to recovery. The rate generally cannot be lower than the Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable rate determined from the “Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with Range of Maturities.” This rate may be revised quarterly by the Secretary of the Treasury and shall be published quarterly by the Department of Health and Human Services in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

                    The Secretary of the Treasury has certified a rate of 12                    1/2                     percent for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. This interest rate will remain in effect until such time as the Secretary of the Treasury notifies HHS of any change.                

Dated: October 17, 2007.

Molly P. Dawson,

Director, Office of Financial Policy and Reporting.

[FR Doc. 07-5233 Filed 10-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
#### STATE v. MULWEE

No. 119 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 366.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 17 December 1975.
EXHIBIT
32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Lescarden Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10 Q for the period ended August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William E. Luther,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1.
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934, and





2.
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
      William E. LutherWilliam
      E. LutherChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerOctober
      13, 2008
#### DORSEY v. DORSEY

No. 55 PC.

No. 149 (Fall Term).

Case below: 53 N.C. App. 622.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 November 1981.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CAESAR WHITE, JR. 

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:09cv574/LAC/EMT

SUSAN NELMS, et al.,

 Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

(Doc. 2). 

Upon review of the motion and attached financial affidavit, the court concludes that Plaintiff

has failed to provide sufficient information for the court to grant the motion. For example, in the

affidavit of financial status, Plaintiff reports that he owns a vehicle worth $1000.00 (Doc. 3 at 2). 

Plaintiff also reports that he may have a “little income” in the State of Florida retirement system but

does not identify the amount of this asset (id. at 4). Further, Plaintiff indicates in the affidavit that,

“when [he] can afford to pay,” he makes monthly payments on debts totaling $900 to $1000,

including for rent ($150.00), student loans ($159.00), cell phone service ($46.00), fuel ($100.00),

food ($300.00 to $400.00), legal fees ($25.00 to $100.00+), and storage charges ($95.00) (id. at 3). 

Plaintiff reports having no cash on hand, no credit cards, savings of only $150.00, and no income

or other assets whatsoever, however, to pay the expenses for his nonessential needs, much less the

expenses for his essential needs such as rent and food. 

In order to proceed with this case, Plaintiff must either pay the full filing fee of $350.00 or

file a properly completed in forma pauperis application. If he chooses to submit a new in forma

pauperis application, he should provide his best estimate of his monthly income and expenses,
Page 2 of 2

including the source and amount of all funds on which he depends to meet his monthly expenses,

so the court has sufficient information upon which to consider his eligibility to proceed in forma

pauperis.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The clerk of court is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the forms for non-prisoner

pro se parties to request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. This case number shall be written on

the forms.

2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE. Within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Plaintiff shall

pay the full $350.00 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with a properly

completed affidavit of financial status.

3. Failure to complywith this order may result in a recommendation of dismissal of this

action.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11 day of January 2010. th

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 3:09cv432/RV/EMT
#### LOFLIN v. LOFLIN

No. 44 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 574.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 4 April 1972.
**AUSTIN** '-'overruled b County Attorney Henderson County Athens, 'Texas Dear Sir: 0 ie tnmte ;ownedtg the fice the fc&mi~ ho is also an agent .be perr&ted to sell ict, of which he is

that he could not issue a tire iasurance policy on the courthouse of said county without violating the provisions of Articls 373 of the Penal Code, and cited the case of Rigby **VS. Stat+,**  **27 Civ.**  Rep. **57, to**  **sustain** his **CtOUClUSiOn.** This opfnion has been followed by subsequent Attorneys General.

### Hon. Harry Boyd, Fags #2.
Trusteesof both aonmonand independentsahooldlstriatshave repeatedly been held by our aourtsto be "aounti orflaers.* KeykerV. Widii.on, 291 8. W; 967, and the authorlties there alted.

You are advisedit'iti our opinionthat-ybur-question should~be

answeredin the,negatlv?, and it-la so answered; Yours very truly ATTORhTEPCKNERAI.OFTSKAS BWB:pbp Assisttint
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
TRINOVA CORPORATION
(In thousands, except per share data)
<CAPTION>
                                        Three Months Ended       Nine Months Ended
                                           September 30            September 30     
                                        ------------------      -------------------
                                         1996       1995         1996           1995
                                         ----       ----         ----           ----
<S>                                    <C>         <C>          <C>           <C>
AVERAGE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK 
AND COMMON STOCK EQUIVALENTS 
OUTSTANDING (NOTE A)
Average shares outstanding                28,286      28,909      28,529      28,850
Assumed conversion of the 6%
 convertible debentures                    1,905       1,905       1,905       1,905
Net effect of dilutive stock                    
 options based upon treasury stock
 method using average market price            67         110          67         110
                                       ---------  ----------  ----------  ----------
Average shares of common stock 
 and common stock equivalents
 outstanding                              30,258      30,924      30,501      30,865
                                      ==========  ==========  ==========            
==========

INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCK (NOTE A)
Net income                            $   20,757  $   18,999  $   78,232  $   74,867
After-tax equivalent of interest
  expense on the 6% convertible
  debentures                                 930         930       2,790       2,790
                                      ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
Income attributable to common stock   $   21,687  $   19,929  $   81,022  $   77,657
                                      ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========  


Net Income per Share                  $      .72  $      .64  $     2.66  $     2.52
                                      ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
<FN>
Note A - Net income per share is computed using the average number of common
shares outstanding, including common stock equivalents.  The assumed
conversion of the Company's 6% convertible debentures was included in average
shares outstanding, increasing the average number of shares outstanding by
1,904,762 shares.  For purposes of computing net income per share, net income
was increased for the after-tax equivalent of interest expense on the 6%
convertible debentures.
</FN>
</TABLE>


                                     -23-
Exhibit 32
  The following statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a knowing or willful misrepresentation.
  Securities and Exchange Commission
 450 Fifth Street, NW
 Washington, DC 20549
  Re: Lee Enterprises, Incorporated
  Ladies and Gentlemen:
  In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to our knowledge:
  (i)
                  this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28, 2010 ("Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(ii)
                  the information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lee Enterprises, Incorporated for the periods presented in the Quarterly Report.
  Date: May 12, 2010
 
 /s/ Mary E. Junck
                  
                  /s/ Carl G. SchmidtMary E. Junck
                  
                  Carl G. SchmidtChairman, President and
                  
                  Vice President, Chief Financial OfficerChief Executive Officer
                  
                  and Treasurer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lee Enterprises, Incorporated and will be retained by Lee Enterprises, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Exhibit 23.02 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-88208) pertaining to the ElantecSemiconductor, Inc. 1983 Stock Option Plan, Elantec Semiconductor, Inc. 1994 Equity Incentive Plan, Elantec Semiconductor, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Elantec Semiconductor, Inc. 1995 Equity Incentive Plan and Elantec Semiconductor, Inc.2001 Equity Incentive Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-31094) pertaining to the Intersil Corporation 1999 Equity Compensation Plan and Intersil Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-50718) pertaining to the SiCOM, Inc. 1985 IncentiveStock Option Plan, SiCOM, Inc. 1996 Equity Incentive Plan and Option Issued to Robert W. Putnam, (Form S-8 No. 333-50722) pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan of No Wires Needed B.V., (Form S-8 No. 333-65804) pertaining to the IntersilCorporation 1999 Equity Compensation Plan, (Form S-4 No. 333-35052) and (Form S-4 No. 333-46984) and the related Prospectuses of Intersil Corporation of our report dated January 28, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedule of Intersil Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KA) for the year ended January 2, 2004. 

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 

June 21, 2004
Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 2 of 3Case 1:07-cv-03480-AKH Document 13 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 3 of 3