COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judg es Frank, Kelsey an d Senior Judge Willis Argued at Ches apeake, Virginia

TIMMY BROWN MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v. Record No. 1596-02-1 JUDG E JERE M. H. WILLIS, JR. MARCH 18, 2003 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF HAMPTON Louis R. Lerner, Judge Terry N. Grinnalds for appellant. Jennifer R. Frankl in, Assistan t Attorney General (Jerry W. Kilgore, Atto rney General, on brief), for appellee.

Timmy Brown was convicted in a bench trial of possession of marijuana. On appeal, he contends (1) that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress, and (2) that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. The Commonwealth has filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that because Brown has not been sentenced in the trial court, there is no final order upon which to base this appeal. We agree and dismiss the appeal.

BACKGROUND On September 20, 20 01, Brown was convicted in the Hampton Juvenile and Domestic Relations Distri ct Court of possession of

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.marijuana. Beca use he had moved to Newp ort News, hi s case was transferred to the juve nile and domestic rela tions court of that jurisdiction, wh ere final dispos ition occurred on January 10,

2002. He moved ba ck to Hampton an d appealed his co nviction to the trial court, which foun d him guilty and, in its March 14, 2002 conviction order, "t ransferred [the] matt er to the Hampton Juvenile and Domestic Relati ons District Court for final disposition." Brown appe als from that order. Analysis Code § 17.1-406 provides, in pertinent part, that "[a]ny aggrieved party may present a petition for appeal to the Court of Appeals from . . . any final conviction in a circuit court of a traffic infraction or a crime, except where a sentence of death has been imposed." (Emphasis added.) It is well settled that in the absence of statute the pronouncement of sentence is a prerequisite to the finality of a judgment. Consequently, where an appeal is limited to a final judgment, an order wherein the pronouncement of sentence is suspended is ordinarily not appealable. Fuller v. Commonwealth , 189 Va. 327, 330, 53 S.E.2d 26, 27 (1949). The trial court convicted appellant but did not pronounce sentence. Instead, it transferred the case back to the juvenile court. In pertinent part, Code § 16.1-297 provides: Upon the rendition of final judgment upon an appeal from the juvenile and domestic relations district court, the circuit court

- 2 -shall cause a copy of its judgment to be filed with the juvenile court within twenty-one days of entry of its order, which shall thereupon become the judgment of the juvenile court. . . . [T]he circuit court may remand the child or adult to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for its supervision and care, under the terms of its order or judgment, and thereafter such child or adult shall be and remain under the jurisdiction of the juvenile court in the same manner as if such court had rendered the judgment in the first instance. Because the trial court failed to render a final judgment, it transferred the case to the juvenile court prematurely. Likewise, this appeal is premature. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal without prejudice and remand the case to the trial court. Dismissed.

- 3 -