alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LETHERIA A WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00001-MP-WCS

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 37, Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant

to the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the total amount of $4,926.30,

representing 28.1 hours of attorney time from 2009 to 2011. Defendant has no objection to

Plaintiff’s request.

The Court finds Plaintiff’s attorney fees to be reasonable and that the $125.00 statutory

cap should be increased to account for increases in the cost of living, which have occurred since

§ 2412(d)(2)(A) was amended in 1996.1

 The Plaintiff’s counsel expended a reasonable number

of total hours.

Defendant will inquire with the Department of Treasury as to whether or not the Plaintiff

has a debt owed to the United States. If such a debt is owed, the EAJA fee award is subject to

offset for the debt owed. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2524 (2010). Defendant will

1

In 1996, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(2)(A) was amended to provide for attorney's fees at

$125.00 per hour. In 2009, the value of $125.00 in 1996 dollars adjusted for inflation per the

Consumer Price Index was $172.25. In 2001, the value of $125.00 in 1996 dollars adjusted for

inflation per the Consumer Price Index was $175.13. In 2011, the value of $125.00 in 1996

dollars adjusted for inflation per the Consumer Price Index is $179.50.

Case 4:10-cv-00001-MP-CAS Document 39 Filed 09/02/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

request, following that offset, that the Department of Treasury make payable directly to the

Plaintiff any remaining amount beyond what is owed to the United States. If no debt is owed to

the United States, Defendant will request that the Department of Treasury make the EAJA fees

payable to the assignee. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees under EAJA in the amount of $4,926.30, subject to any

offsetting debt owed by the Plaintiff to the United States. If the agreement between

Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel is such that these fees are assigned to Plaintiff Counsel,

any fees or partial fees received by the Plaintiff are to be considered held in trust for, and

payable to, Plaintiff's Counsel.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 4:10-cv-00001-MP-WCS

Case 4:10-cv-00001-MP-CAS Document 39 Filed 09/02/11 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.2 BARCLAYCARD FUNDING PLCS OFFICERS CERTIFICATE GRACECHURCH RECEIVABLES TRUSTEE LIMITED
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE The undersigned officer of Barclaycard Funding PLC, a private limited liability company
incorporated under the laws of Jersey, Channel Islands (the MTN Issuer), hereby certifies on
behalf of the MTN Issuer and on his own behalf for purposes of the Investor Certificate, as
follows: 1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the MTN Issuer;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the MTN Issuer; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the MTN Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of the Investor Certificate for the period between January 1, 2004
and December 31, 2004.
 Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the
Registration Statement related to the above-referenced issue of Investor Certificate. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name this 30th day of June, 2005. By:
    
    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName: Paul Gerard TurnerTitle: Director
# CE2013227EN.01003902.xml

| 6.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 227/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 227/39

---

Thursday 19 January 2012Pedestrian safety and light emitting diodes (LEDs) ***

P7_TA(2012)0006

European Parliament legislative resolution of 19 January 2012 on the draft Council decision on the position of the European Union in relation to the draft Regulation of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on pedestrian safety and to the draft Regulation of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning Light Emitting Diode (LED) light sources (13895/2011 – C7-0302/2011 – 2011/0188(NLE))

(2013/C 227 E/12)

(Consent)

The European Parliament,

The European Parliament

| — | having regard to the draft Council decision (13895/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the draft Council decision (13895/2011),

| — | having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with the second indent of Article 4(2) of Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 with a view to accession by the European Community to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (‘Revised 1958 Agreement.’) (1) (C7-0302/2011), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the request for consent submitted by the Council in accordance with the second indent of Article 4(2) of Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 with a view to accession by the European Community to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (‘Revised 1958 Agreement.’) (1) (C7-0302/2011),

1

| — | having regard to Rule 81 of its Rules of Procedure, |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to Rule 81 of its Rules of Procedure,

| — | having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0004/2012), |
| --- | --- |

—

having regard to the recommendation of the Committee on International Trade (A7-0004/2012),

| 1. | Consents to the draft Council decision; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Consents to the draft Council decision;

| 2. | Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

---

(1)  OJ L 346, 17.12.1997, p. 78.

1

---
#### JOHNSON v. JOHNSON

No. 64 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 505.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 December 1971.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1
                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Global Boulevard International, Inc.
(the  "Company")  on  Form  10-KSB  for the period ending December 31, 2002, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of  the  Company,  certifies,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of
     the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                         /s/ James McCabe
                         ______________________________________
                         By: James McCabe
                         Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer
                         March 26 2003
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                WRITTEN STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350

         Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Z-Tel Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Horace J. Davis III
-------------------------------------
Horace J. Davis III
March 30, 2004

         A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Z-Tel
Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by the Z-Tel Technologies, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### RAYNOR v. FOSTER

No. 34 PC.

Case below: 12 N.C. App. 193.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 5 October 1971.
thg-ex101_7.htm



Exhibit 10.1



 

March 26, 2020

 

 

J. Kendall Huber

Executive Vice President, General Counsel 

 & Assistant Secretary

The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc.

440 Lincoln Street

Worcester, MA 01653

 

Dear Jay:

 

Let me first express, both personally and on behalf of the Board of Directors and the entire organization, our profound gratitude for all you have done for The Hanover.  While we look forward to the future under new leadership in the OGC, we will greatly miss your commitment, passion, sober and thoughtful counsel, professionalism, and strategic insight.  You were a constant and steadying force during our incredible transformation over the past twenty years.  Indeed, you helped to guide us through many challenges faced by our company, including the time period when we were without a CEO, through Hurricane Katrina, the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009, and of course the transformative purchase and sale of Chaucer.

 

We appreciate that you are willing to make your experience and expertise available as we transition to our new General Counsel.  Dennis is very pleased to know that he will be able to consult with you as he assumes his new responsibilities.  

 

As previously agreed, you will continue in your current position as Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Assistant Secretary of The Hanover until Dennis assumes such responsibilities.  This is anticipated to occur on April 1, 2020, at which point your responsibilities in those roles will immediately cease and your employment with The Hanover shall terminate.  Accordingly, your last day of employment will be April 1, 2020.  However, as of such date and through July 31, 2020, you have agreed to remain available to the Company as an independent contractor, on a limited, part-time basis, in an advisory role as needed.  In this capacity, your responsibilities will include providing advice and assistance to the Partner Group, as well as rendering such other services as may be requested from time to time by the Board of Directors.  

 

In consideration of your agreement to provide such services, you will be paid a consulting fee of $37,500 per calendar month, beginning April 1, 2020.



 



 

 



I am glad that we have agreed to a mutually beneficial transition plan.  We look forward to our continuing partnership and wish you a long and healthy retirement.

 

Sincerely,

 


	
	
/s/ John C. Roche

	
John C. Roche

	
President and Chief Executive Officer

	
 

	
 

	
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

	
 

	
/s/ J. Kendall Huber

	
J. Kendall Huber

	
March 26, 2020
#### EFFIE MAE MORRIS, Administratrix of JOSEPH ROBERT COLLIE, Deceased v. ANNIE HAZEL S. COLLIE, Widow, J.R. (Cullen) COLLIE, CHARLES COLLIE, CLAYTON COLLIE, EARL COLLIE, ANTHONY COLLIE, VAN BUREN COLLIE, and JOYCE COLLIE, a Minor, Heirs-at-Law of JOSEPH ROBERT COLLIE, Deceased.

(Filed 4 November, 1964.)

Appeal by Effie Mae Morris from *Hobgood, J.,*in Chambers, FraNK-LiN Superior Court, May 30, 1964.

The plaintiff instituted this adversary proceeding on May 7, 1964, to have the court accept, audit and approve her attached settlement and final account as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Robert Collie. The account showed the plaintiff had advanced $77.00 and had paid out that amount for bond and court costs; and that the estate was due her that amount.

A notation in the account showed that as Administratrix of Joseph Robert Collie and Executrix of John C. Matthews, she had received a check for $11,075.55 from Pilot Life Insurance Co., which had been assigned by Mr. Collie to John C. Matthews as security for a debt due by Collie to Matthews. Further facts in connection with this transaction are disclosed in the opinion filed this day in a companion case entitled, *“In the Matter of Effie Mae Morris, Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Robert Collie, Deceased.”*From an order dismissing this proceeding signed by Judge Hobgood, the plaintiff appealed.

*Gaither M. Beam, Hobart Brantley for plaintiff appellant.*

*W. H. Taylor, E. C. Bulluck for respondent appellees.*

Per Curiam.

The order dismissing the appeal in this case was based on Judge Hobgood’s order entered May 30, 1964, upon the ground that relief is wholly incorporated in and adjudicated by the order in the companion proceeding above referred to, and for that reason the action should be dismissed.

In view of the order in the companion case, we agree that provision is made for the adjudication of the entire controversy. The order is

Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.23


 


Fourth Amendment to


Executive Employment Agreement


 


FOURTH AMENDMENT, dated as of May 8, 2018
and effective as of May 8, 2018 (this “Amendment”), to the Executive Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2014,
and amended on May 13, 2015, February 11, 2017 and March 2, 2017 (as amended, the “Agreement”) by and between Mafco
Worldwide LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), and Lucas Bailey (the “Executive”).


 


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the
Agreement;


 


NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


 


		1.	Amendment to Section 1.1. Section 1.1 of the Agreement entitled “Employment, Duties and Acceptance” is hereby
amended to add the words “President and” before the words “Chief Operating Officer”.



 


		2.	No Other Change. Except as set forth herein, there are no other changes to the Agreement, which, as amended hereby,
remains in full force and effect.



 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment
to the Agreement to be executed and delivered as of the date written first above.


 


	 	MAFCO WORLDWIDE LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Thomas M. Molchan
	 	 	Thomas M. Molchan
	 	 	Sr. VP & General Counsel
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Lucas Bailey
	 	 	Lucas Bailey
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         461,656
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               637,350
<PP&E>                                         271,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,976,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,030,466
<BONDS>                                        120,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       143,688
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,577,626
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,976,780
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               319,443
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,027,715
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (115,735)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,011,585)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,011,585)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,011,585)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MARCUS GLOVER,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-0007-MP-AK

WALTER A. McNEIL,

Respondent.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,

and Doc. 2, Petitioner’s motion to hold the Petition in abeyance pending exhaustion of

state remedies. Petitioner has not paid the $5.00 filing fee or filed a motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis. Therefore, consideration of the petition and the motion will

be deferred until payment is received or IFP is granted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

That the Clerk shall forward to Petitioner an application for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis;

That Petitioner shall have until February 25, 2010, to either file an application for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $5.00 filing fee;

 That failure to respond to this order as instructed will result in a

recommendation of dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute and failure to
Page 2 of 2

comply with an order of this court.1 

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of January, 2010.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 Petitioner should note that if he fails to respond to this Order and this case is dismissed, any subsequentlyfiled habeas petition in this Court challenging the same conviction may be barred by the one-year limitation period

for filing a habeas petition in the federal courts. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). Although the one-year period of

limitation is tolled during the time in which a properly filed application for state post- conviction relief is pending,

see Artuz v. Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 8-9 (2000) (defining when an application is "properly filed" under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2244(d)(2)), the time in which a federal habeas petition is pending does not toll the one-year limitation period. See

Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167 (2001) (holding that an application for federal habeas corpus review does not toll

the one-year limitation period under § 2244(d)(2)).

Case No: 1:10-cv-7-MP-AK
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Goldrich Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrich Mining Company.







/s/ Ted R. Sharp

DATE:  November 16, 2009

Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Goldrich Mining Company and will be retained by Goldrich Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM LESCARDEN
INC'S AUGUST 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                          40,615
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,103
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,183
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,803
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,192
<OTHER-SE>                                    (86,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,183
<SALES>                                             11
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    11
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  146,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (146,178)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (146,178)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (146,178)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>