alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Rodger L. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer of Knology,Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Knology, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

Date: March 28, 2006
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

04

- 20

- 00404

- CV

IN RE Aaron Michael COOK

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: Augus t 19, 2020

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 12 , 2020, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the

petition and the record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly,

the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019EM501414 , styled In the Interest of B.M.C., a Child , pending in the

438th Judicial District Court, Bexar County , Texas . The Honorable Norma Gonzales signed the order at issue in this

original proceeding.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Goldrich Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard R. Walters, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrich Mining Company.







/s/ Richard R. Walters

DATE:  May 15, 2009

Richard R. Walters, President





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Goldrich Mining Company and will be retained by Goldrich Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Asia4sale.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Montandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerJanuary 26, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-03373-SHS Document 10 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 1 of 2Case 1:07-cv-03373-SHS Document 10 Filed 12/14/2007 Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 12, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 12, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16I0240. SHAWNA DEAN JONES v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

16SU00335
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1
 COMPANYS OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 8) PLC
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the Issuer;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the Issuer; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of Notes for the period between January 1, 2006 and the end of
the Issuers fiscal year on December 31, 2006.
  th
 By:
    
    /s/ Jonathon William AlbrightName: Jonathon William AlbrightTitle: Director
 - 29 -
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

BARBARA H. ENGBERG,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv64/RV/EMT

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated December 22, 2011 (doc. 32). The parties have been furnished a copy of

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s “Application for Attorney Fee Under the Equal Access to Justice Act” 

(doc. 30) is GRANTED as follows:

Plaintiff, Barbara Engberg, shall recover fees in the amount of $5,750.00, for time

expended by her counsel in representing her before the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (EAJA). The

United States forthwith shall issue a check payable directly to Ms. Engberg.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of January, 2012.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00064-RV-EMT Document 33 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS 
Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc.
(In thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>
                                        
                                 Three Months
                                    Ended                Year Ended December 31
                                   March 31,  ----------------------------------------
                                    1997       1996    1995     1994     1993     1992
                                    ----       ----    ----     ----     ----     ----

<S>                              <C>          <C>     <C>      <C>      <C>      <C>
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
  CHARGES                             

Income before income taxes and
  cumulative effect of accounting
  change                          $  6,594 $153,421  $128,196 $101,255 $ 17,111 $ 24,042
Dividends received, net of equity
  in earnings (loss) of               
  unconsolidated affiliates            382    9,961    (3,704)    1,213       1   (1,931)
Fixed charges                       11,800   41,712    31,762   30,249   33,370   34,623
                                  -------- --------  -------- -------- -------- ---------

Income before cumulative effect
  of accounting change for
  computation purposes            $ 18,776 $205,094  $156,254 $132,717 $ 50,482 $ 56,734
                                  ======== ========  ======== ======== ======== =========

FIXED CHARGES

Interest expense, including 
  interest related to corporate 
  owned life insurance            $ 10,066 $ 34,963  $ 24,477 $ 22,582 $ 25,516 $ 26,313
Portion of rent expense 
  representing interest              1,584    6,288     6,903    7,303    7,490    7,987
Amortization of debt expense and
  debt discount                        150      461       382      364      364      323
                                  -------- --------  -------- -------- -------- --------
Total fixed charges               $ 11,800 $ 41,712  $ 31,762 $ 30,249 $ 33,370 $ 34,623
                                  ======== ========  ======== ======== ======== ========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges    1.6x     4.9x      4.9x     4.4x     1.5x     1.6x  
                                  ======== ========  ======== ======== ======== ========

<FN>

For the purpose of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
"earnings" consist of income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change, plus fixed charges and dividends received, net of equity in
earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates.  Fixed charges consists of
interest expense, the portion of rent expense representing interest and
amortization of debt discount.  

</FN>
</TABLE>

                                   -33-
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LEVIETA DOSTER, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

Case No. 5:10cv50-MCR/WCS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner, Social

Security Administration,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Defendant has moved for reversal of the decision of the Commissioner,

entry of judgment pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and remand of this

cause to the Commissioner. Doc. 18. Plaintiff does not oppose a sentence four

remand and the motion should be granted. A sentence four remand is discretionary,

but requires that the court enter "a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the

decision of the Commissioner." The proper option in this case is to reverse the

Commissioner's decision and remand. Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 111 S.Ct.

2157, 115 L.Ed.2d 78 (1991).
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court GRANT Defendant's motion for

entry of judgment and remand, doc. 18, DIRECT the Clerk to enter final judgment

REVERSING the Commissioner's decision to deny benefits, and REMAND the

application to the Commissioner for rehearing pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §

405(g) for the purposes stated in the motion.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on October 7, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10

days after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections

limits the scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 5:10cv50-MCR/WCS
#### C. W. FULTON and GRANITE CITY MOTOR COMPANY v. GEORGE C. WRIGHT.

(Filed 16 June, 1961.)

Appeal by plaintiff Fulton from *Johnston, J.,*February 1961 Term of Sueey.

This is a companion case to *Fulton v. Talbert, ante,*183. Except *186for the name of the defendant, the complaint herein is substantially identical with the complaint in that case. Here as there defendant demurred for failure to state a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained and plaintiff appealed.

*Folger & Folger for plaintiff appellant.*

*Woltz & Faw for defendant appellee.*

Per Cueiam.

For the reasons given in *Fulton v. Talbert, ante,*183, the judgment is

Affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 VS CASE NO. 1:10-CR-19-01 MMP 

 CHRISTOPHER S. CARTER

FINANCIAL REFERRAL AND ORDER

Regarding release of funds for: X Fine, Restitution, Filing Fee, Attorney Admission Fee,

 Copy Fee, Bond, Other (Specify) 

By: Christopher Scott Carter #20674-017 (Payee)

Address: FCI Coleman Low

PO Box 1031

Coleman, FL 33521

Receipt Number B110810DFLN110CR000019 Date of Receipt 12/21/10 

Motion: N/A

Explanation: Christopher Carter’s $100.00 special assessment was paid in full on 08/02/10. The Clerk’s

office received $100.00 on the November 2010 Bureau of Prisons (BOP) reports. According to the court

dockets and financial records, Mr. Carter does not owe any additional money. Requesting authorization

to refund the $100.00 overpayment and any other payments we may receive from the BOP for this case. 

There may be a timing difference on the BOP stopping payments for this account.

SHEILA HURST-RAYBORN, Acting Clerk of Court

Prepared by: ___s/Philip Detweiler___________

 Philip Detweiler, Financial Specialist Date: December 28, 2010

Referred by: ,Deputy Clerk

ORDER OF COURT

It is ORDERED this 29th day of December , 2010, that the Clerk refund the identified funds

to the payee.

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 MAURICE M. PAUL, SENIOR 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Adopted: 12/03/99
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.1
 COMPANYS OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 8) PLC
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the Issuer;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the Issuer; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Issuer has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of Notes for the period between January 1, 2005 and the end of
the Issuers fiscal year on December 31, 2005.
   By:

    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:   Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:     Director
 - 29 -
# C_2011116EN.01001001.xml

| 14.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/10

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain countervailing measures

2011/C 116/05

1.   As provided for in Article 18(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 of 11 June 2009 (1) on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community, the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the countervailing measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of subsidisation and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 18(4) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Polyethyleneterephthalate (PET) | India | Countervailing duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 193/2007 (OJ L 59, 27.2.2007, p. 34) | 28.2.2012 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Polyethyleneterephthalate (PET)

India

Countervailing duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 193/2007 (OJ L 59, 27.2.2007, p. 34)

28.2.2012

---

(1)  OJ L 188, 18.7.2009, p. 93.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

---
Page 1 of 2

1

 Petitioner may be referring to the Mississippi State Penitentiary in Parchman,

Mississippi. There is no Parchmanth or Parchmanth institution in Florida.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANTHONY DALE SIKORA, 

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv184-SPM/WCS

LARRY CAMPBELL, 

Respondent.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS § 2254 PETITION

Petitioner Sikora, proceeding pro se, filed two 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petitions: one in

this case and one in 4:10cv158-MP/WCS. They both challenge his placement in

solitary confinement at the Leon County Jail for 120 days. For relief in this case,

Petitioner asks for a hearing and to be returned to general population, asserting that

"[m]y 2 years as trustee in Parchmanth [sic] Prison show that I can be [afforded] at least

this." Doc. 1, p. 6.1

 The petition was signed and mailed on May 12, 2010. Id. 
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:10cv184-SPM/WCS

In addition to the habeas petitions, Petitioner filed a number of civil rights cases

in this court during his time at the Leon County Jail. In one case the order of dismissal

and copy of the judgment, sent to Petitioner, were returned to the clerk in an envelope

marked "released." Doc. 9 (return of docs. 7 and 8) in 4:10cv165-RH/WCS. It was

discovered by telephone call to the jail that Petitioner was released to "time served" on

June 7, 2010, and left no forwarding address. The jail website confirms this release

date. See http://lcso.leonfl.org/jailinfo/inmate_search.asp. Petitioner has not informed

the court (in this or his other cases) of a new address.

It appears that the request for relief is moot in light of Petitioner's release.

It is therefore respectfully RECOMMENDED that the § 2254 petition (doc. 1) be

DISMISSED as moot.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on July 2, 2010.

 S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after

being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of

review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

MTN ISSUERS OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

BARCLAYCARD FUNDING PLC
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

The undersigned officer of Barclaycard Funding PLC, a public limited company
incorporated in England and Wales (the MTN Issuer), hereby certifies on
behalf of the MTN Issuer and on his own behalf for purposes of the MTN
Certificate, as follows:



|1. |  | I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the MTN Issuer;                                                                                                                                                                                
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on
behalf of the MTN Issuer; and                                                                                                                                                
|  
|3. |  | To the best of my knowledge, the MTN Issuer has complied with all
conditions and covenants under the Relevant Documents for the issue of
MTNs for the period between October 24, 2002 and the end of the MTN
Issuers fiscal year on December 14, 2002.

Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned
to such terms in the Registration Statement related to the above-referenced
issue of the MTN Certificate.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name this 16th day of June, 2003.

|    |  |                                                 | 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------- | 
|By: |  | /s/      Richard Francis Sommers               
|    |  | Name: Richard Francis Sommers
Title:   Director