alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. DEE D. ATKINSON

No. 49

(Filed 12 April 1972)

Criminal Law § 135— life sentence — compliance with Supreme Court order Judgment of life imprisonment imposed by the superior court in compliance with an order of the N. C. Supreme Court is affirmed.

Justice Lake dissenting.

Appeal by defendant from *Tillery,*/., November 1971 Criminal Session of Wayne Superior Court.

*153
      *Attorney General Robert Morgan and Deputy Attorney General Andrew A. Vanore, Jr., for the State.*

*Komegay & Bruce by George R. Kornegay, Jr., for defendant appellant.*

MOORE, Justice.

In *State v. Atkinson,*279 N.C. 386, 183 S.E. 2d 106, filed September 7, 1971, for the reasons there stated by Chief Justice Bobbitt, this Court remanded the cause to the Superior Court of Wayne County for the pronouncement of judgment imposing a sentence of life imprisonment. On November 3, 1971, in open court, after due notice and in the presence of defendant and his counsel, Judge Tillery pronounced judgment that defendant be imprisoned for life in the State’s prison. Defendant excepted and gave notice of appeal. The questions he attempts to raise by his assignments of error on the present appeal heretofore have been decided adversely to defendant in this cause.

Judge Tillery’s judgment, having been entered in strict compliance with our order of September 7, 1971, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Justice Lake

dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons previously stated in my dissenting opinions in *State v. Hill,*279 N.C. 371, 378, 183 S.E. 2d 97, and in the present case when heretofore remanded by this Court for the entry of the judgment now affirmed. *State v. Atkinson,*279 N.C. 386, 183 S.E. 2d 106.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DAVID EUGENE TURNER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10-cv-00193-MP-WCS

TRACIE CRAWFORD, MONICA DAVID, FREDERICK B DUNPHY, HOLLY HAMLIN, M

LOCKE, WALTER MCNEIL, F MOCK, TENA M PATE, SHERON WELLS,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 13, Report and Recommendation regarding the

Motion to Dismiss Filed by David Eugene Turner, Doc. 11. The Magistrate Judge recommends

that Mr. Turner’s motion to voluntarily dismiss under Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure be granted. The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation stated clearly that the partial

filing fee paid in this case cannot be put “on hold” in case the matter comes before the Court

again, and neither can the Court put the controversy generally “on hold” while the Plaintiff seeks

more thoroughly to exhaust his administrative remedies. Therefore, while the Recommendation

is that the Motion to Dismiss itself be granted, the additional requested remedies will not be. 

Neither party has objected to the recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. 

Finding no error, it is accordingly

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, Doc. 13, is ADOPTED

and incorporated herein. 

2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss, Doc. 11, is GRANTED. 
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:10-cv-00193-MP-WCS

3. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1 GRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 3) PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 I, Paul Gerard Turner, certify that:  1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Card Funding (No. 3) PLC;2.

Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.

I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.

The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement. By:
    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:
    Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:
    DirectorDate:
    June 30, 2005
|EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                         OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer
of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (the Company), that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2007
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By:/s/
Alfred R. Kahn     
Alfred R. Kahn      Chairman of the Board and      Chief Executive
Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: May 10, 2007
|------------------

| | By:/s/
Bruce R. Foster     
Bruce R. Foster      Executive Vice President and      Chief Financial
Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and will
be retained by 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### SCHOFIELD v. TEA CO.

No. 93 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 508.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 May 1977.
- Button1: 
    - Button2: 
    - Button3: 
    - Button6: 
    - Button7: 
    - Button8: 
    - Button9: 
    - Button10: 
    - Button11: 
    - Button12: 
    - Button13: 
    - Button15: 
    - Button16: 
    - Button17: 
    - Button19: 
    - Button20: 
    - Button21: 
    - Button22: 
    - Button23: 
    - Button24: 
    - Button25: 
    - Button26: 
    - Button27: 
    - Button28: 
    - Button29: 
    - Button30: 
    - Button31:
tme-ex432_404.htm



 

Exhibit 4.32

Spousal Consent

 

The undersigned, Chu Jie, (Identification No.: [          ]), is the lawful spouse of Gu Dejun (Identification No.: [          ]). I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree to the execution of the following documents by Gu Dejun as of 12 September, 2019 (the “Transaction Documents”) and the disposal of the equity interest of Xizang Qiming Music Co., Ltd. (the “Domestic Company”) held by Gu Dejun and registered under his name pursuant to the provisions of the following documents:


	
 
	
(1)
	
the equity interest pledge agreement by and among Tencent Music (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (the “WFOE”), the Domestic Company and other parties;





	
 
	
(2)
	
the exclusive option agreement by and among the WFOE, the Domestic Company and other parties;





	
 
	
(3)
	
the debt assignment and offset agreement by and between Gu Dejun and the WFOE; and





	
 
	
(4)
	
the power of attorney issued by Gu Dejun to the WFOE.




 

I hereby confirm that I do not enjoy any interests or rights in the Domestic Company and hereby undertake not to make any assertions in respect of the equity interest of the Domestic Company. I further confirm that, Gu Dejun can perform the Transaction Documents and further amend or terminate the Transaction Documents or execute other agreements to replace the Transaction Documents absent any authorization or consent from me.

 

I hereby undertake to execute all necessary documents, and take all necessary actions, to ensure appropriate performance of the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time).

 

I hereby agree and undertake that, if I acquire any equity interests in the Domestic Company for whatever reasons, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) and shall comply with the obligations of a shareholder of the Domestic Company thereunder. For this purpose, upon the WFOE’s request, I shall execute a series of written documents in substantially the same format and content as the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time).

 


	
Signature:
	
 
	
/s/Chu Jie

	
Date:
	
 
	
12 September, 2019




 

1
# C_2011373EN.01002301.xml

| 21.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/23

---

Notice of the expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2011/C 373/11

Further to the publication of a notice of impending expiry (1) following which no duly substantiated request for a review was lodged, the Commission gives notice that the anti-dumping measure mentioned below will shortly expire.

1

This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (2).

2

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate | Algeria
  Belarus
  Russia
  Ukraine | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 (OJ L 365, 21.12.2006, p. 26) as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 789/2008 (OJ L 213, 8.8.2008, p. 14) and as last amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1251/2009 (OJ L 338, 19.12.2009, p. 5) | 22.12.2011 |
| Undertaking | Commission Decision 2008/649/EC (OJ L 213, 8.8.2008, p. 39) |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Solutions of urea and ammonium nitrate

Algeria

Belarus

Russia

Ukraine

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1911/2006 (OJ L 365, 21.12.2006, p. 26) as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 789/2008 (OJ L 213, 8.8.2008, p. 14) and as last amended by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1251/2009 (OJ L 338, 19.12.2009, p. 5)

22.12.2011

Undertaking

Commission Decision 2008/649/EC (OJ L 213, 8.8.2008, p. 39)

---

(1)  OJ C 64, 1.3.2011, p. 11.

1

(2)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---
# C_2011365EN.01000501.xml

| 15.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/5

---

Notice regarding the adaptation in line with inflation of certain amounts laid down in the life and non-life insurance directives

2011/C 365/06

In accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2002/83/EC (1) concerning life assurance, the amount laid down in euros in Article 29(2) was reviewed in 2011 in order to take account of changes in the European index of consumer prices comprising all Member States, as published by Eurostat. As a result of the review, the amount laid down in euros is increased from EUR 3 500 000 to EUR 3 700 000. The Commission Services have informed the European Parliament and the Council of the review and the adapted amount.

1

In accordance with Article 17a of Directive 73/239/EEC (2) on the coordination of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the taking-up and pursuit of the business of direct insurance other than life assurance, as amended by Directive 2002/13/EC (3), the amounts laid down in euros in Article 16(a)(3) and (4) and Article 17(2) were reviewed in 2011 in order to take account of changes in the European index of consumer prices comprising all Member States, as published by Eurostat. As a result of the review, the amount laid down in euros in Article 16(a)(3) is increased from EUR 57 500 000 to EUR 61 300 000. The amount laid down in euros in Article 16(a)(4) is increased from EUR 40 300 000 to EUR 42 900 000. The amounts laid down in euros in Article 17(2) are increased from EUR 2 300 000 to EUR 2 500 000 and from EUR 3 500 000 to EUR 3 700 000 respectively. The Commission Services have informed the European Parliament and the Council of the review and the adapted amounts.

2

3

---

(1)  OJ L 345, 19.12.2002, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 228, 16.8.1973, p. 3.

2

(3)  OJ L 77, 20.3.2002, p. 17.

3

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

WENDY MCGHEE,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-20/RS-EMT

SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE of

BONIFAY, LLC d/b/a BONIFAY

NURSING and REHAB CENTER,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

UORDER

Before me is the Notice of Resolution (Doc. 30). Pursuant to N.D. Fla. Loc. 16.2,

it is ordered: 

1. The case is dismissed from the active docket of the court. 

2. In the event that the settlement is not consummated, the court reserves 

jurisdiction, upon motion filed by any party within sixty days of the date of this 

Order, to amend or vacate and set aside this Order and reinstate the case. 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file of this case for administrative purposes, 

and upon the expiration of sixty days without activity, the clerk is direct to 

close the case in its entirety for all purposes. 

ORDERED on December 13, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSEPHINE YVETTE WILLIAMS, EVA R.

WILLIAMS-BROWN F/K/A EVA R. WELTE,

ROSEMARY COX, and DARRELL D. GRIFFIN

and those others that are similarly situated,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv43/RS-AK

ANCHORAGE CHILDREN’S HOME OF BAY

COUNTY, INC. and BIG BEND COMMUNITY 

BASED CARE, INC.

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Defendant Big Bend Community Based Care’s (“Big Bend”) motion to 

dismiss the amended complaint (Doc. 33). 

I. STANDARD OF REVIEW

In order to overcome a motion to dismiss, a plaintiff must allege enough facts to state a 

claim to relief that is plausible on its face. See Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 

127 S. Ct. 1955 (2007). Granting a motion to dismiss is appropriate if it is clear that no relief 

could be granted under any set of facts that could be proven consistent with the allegations of the 

complaint. Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 104 S. Ct. 2229, 2232 (1984). I must 

construe all allegations in the complaint as true and in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. 

Shands Teaching Hosp. and Clinics, Inc. v. Beech Street Corp., 208 F.3d 1308, 1310 (11th Cir. 

2000), citing Lowell v. American Cyanamid Co., 177 F.3d 1228, 1229 (11th Cir. 1999). 
II. ANALYSIS

Big Bend argues it is entitled to dismissal because it was not an employer of Plaintiffs. 

The Eleventh Circuit has adopted the test of the former Fifth Circuit and considers the “total 

employment situation” in evaluating whether an entity qualifies as an employer under the Fair 

Labor Standards Act. Welch v. Laney, 57 F.3d 1004, 1011 (11th Cir. 1995). In particular, the 

Eleventh Circuit considers whether or not the employment took place on the premises of the 

alleged employer; how much control the alleged employer exerted on the employees; and 

whether the alleged employer had the power to “fire, hire, or modify the employment condition 

of the employees.” Id. In the instant case, Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges that Big Bend was their 

employer, supervised them, and had “operational control” over the Plaintiffs as employees. This 

is sufficient to state a plausible claim of relief. Therefore, Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 

33) is denied. 

ORDERED on July 19, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

RONALD DEESE,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:10-CV-25-SPM

FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT

OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES STATE

OF FLORIDA,

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the “Mediation Report” (doc.

59), which represents that the case has been settled. Pursuant to Northern

District of Florida Local Rule 16.2(D), it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. This case is hereby dismissed.

2. The Court shall retain jurisdiction for a period of 60 days, during

which time any party may move to reopen for good cause shown.

3. All pending motions are denied as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-eighth day of January, 2011.

s/Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:10cr43/MCR

JOHNNIE MALLETY, JR.

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there has been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the plea agreement pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(2), the plea of

guiltyof the defendant, JOHNNIE MALLETY, JR., to the two count indictment against

him is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing

as directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
| (1)  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |

| Date:      March 6, 2009                                                  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                      |
| /s/ Larry D. Ryan                                                         |
| Larry      D. RyanChief      Executive Officer                            |
|                                                                      |
|  Date:      March 6, 2009                                            |
|                                                                      |
| /s/ Stanley W. Farmer                                                     |
| Stanley      W. FarmerVice      President andChief      Financial Officer |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2296 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2296

             To reauthorize the Pregnancy Assistance Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2019

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Casey) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To reauthorize the Pregnancy Assistance Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pregnancy Assistance Act of 2019''.

SEC. 2. PREGNANCY ASSISTANCE FUND.

    Section 10214 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (42 
U.S.C. 18204) is amended by striking ``2010 through 2019'' and 
inserting ``2020 through 2024''.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 12, 2014

No. 04

- 13

- 00157

- CV

William McDonald RIDDICK

, Appellant

v.

Cynthia Riddick MARMOLEJO , Warren Pretlow Riddick

, Patricia Riddick Nathan,

and William P. Riddick,

Appellees

From the Probate Court No

. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- PC

- 3942

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. It is ORDERED that Appellees, Cynthia Riddick

M armolejo , Warren Pretlow Riddic k, Patricia Riddick Nathan, and William P. Riddick, recover

their costs of appeal from Appellant William McDonald R iddick

.

It is so ORDERED on March 12, 2014.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the

said court on this 12th day of March, 2014.

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk