alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
tme-ex453_398.htm



 

Exhibit 4.53

Debt Assignment and Offset Agreement

 

This Debt Assignment and Offset Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into on October 1, 2019 in Beijing, by and among Xie Guomin (Passport No.: [          ]) (the “Transferor”), and Wang Meiqi (PRC Identification number: [          ]) (the “Transferee”), and Yeelion Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.(the “WFOE”).

 

Whereas, Xie Guomin and Wang Meiqi entered into a share transfer Agreement on August 20, 2019 (the “Share Transfer Agreement”), pursuant to which the Transferor shall transfer 23.02% equity interests held by him of  Beijing Kuwo Technology Co., Ltd. (the “VIE Company”) (the “Target Equity”, which equals to RMB 6,000,000 of the registered capital of the VIE Company) to the Transferee.  Pursuant to the Share Transfer Agreement, the consideration of the Target Equity is RMB 6,000,000 (the “Transfer Price”).

 

Whereas, the Transferor and Shi Lixue entered into a Loan Agreement with the WFOE on July 12, 2016 ( the “Loan Agreement”), pursuant to which the WFOE lent RMB 6,000,000 (the “Loan”) to the Transferor.

 

In view of above, the parties agree as follows:

 


	
1.
	
The Transferor agrees to transfer its obligation to pay the Loan (including relevant interests) to the Transferee and the Transferee agrees to inherit the obligation to pay the Loan (including relevant interests).  As the consideration that the Transferee agrees to inherit the obligation to pay the Loan (including relevant interests), the portion of the Transfer Price equal to the Loan (including relevant interests) that the Transferee shall pay to the Transferor, shall be deemed paid.  When this Agreement comes into effect, the Transferee shall replace the Transferor and become the borrower under the Loan Agreement and the Transferee shall pay the Loan (including relevant interests) pursuant to the Loan Agreement and fulfill other obligations thereunder. 




 


	
2.
	
The WFOE, as the creditor of the Loan, agrees the assignment of the debt under Article 1 hereof. 




 


	
3.
	
This agreement shall come into force automatically upon the effective date of the Share Transfer Agreement.




 

 

 

 

[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 

1



 

The Signature Page of the Debt Assignment and Offset Agreement

 


	
Xie Guomin
	
Wang Meiqi

	
Signed: /s/ Xie Guomin
	
Signed: /s/ Wang Meiqi

	
 
	
 

	
Yeelion Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
	
 

	
/s/ Seal of Yeelion Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
#### LEVI v. JUSTICE and SEARCY v. JUSTICE

No. 5 PC.

Case below: 27 N.C. App. 511.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 February 1976.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:10cr30/MCR

ROBERT E. BOURLIER,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL ON JURY VERDICT

Based on the jury’s verdict of not guilty as to this defendant on Counts Five, Eight,

and Fifty-One following a trial on May 24, 2011, the defendant ROBERT E. BOURLIER is

hereby ADJUDGED NOT GUILTY of the charges in Counts Five, Eight and Fifty-One and

these charges are hereby DISMISSED. A mistrial is declared as to Counts Two, ThirtyOne, Thirty-Three, and Sixty-Five.

DONE and ORDERED at Pensacola, Florida, this 25 day of May, 2011. th

 

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cr-00030-MCR-EMT Document 291 Filed 05/25/11 Page 1 of 1
#### Edward S. Rowland, plaintiff in error, *vs.*Isaac Coleman *et al.,*defendant in error.

(By two judges.) An assignment by one, insolvent at the time, to one creditor, to the exclusion of others, and providing for a return of the surplus, after paying the debt to the assessor, is not, since the Act of 1866, in this State, fraudulent upon its face as to other creditors, and a bill alleging no other facts, but merely charging that the said assignment was intended to defraud and delay another creditor, but stating no other facts indicating fraud, is demurrable for want of equity. 5th March, 1872.

Assignment. Equity pleading. Before Judge Johnson. Muscogee Superior Court. May Term, 1871.

Rowland, by bill, sought to set aside an assignment made by Coleman and wife to Ransom *&*Company, averring that said assignment was “made reserving a certain surplus to Coleman, and with the intent to delay and defraud ” Rowland — said Ransom & Company knowing such was the object thereof. He averred that this assignment was made pending his suit against Coleman, in which he subsequently had a judgment which is unpaid. The bill was dismissed upon demurrer, and that is assigned as error.

L. T. Downing, for plaintiff in error.

Chappell & Russell; Farrow & Thomas, for defendants.

*205McCay, Judge.

Our Act of 1865, 1866, authorizes a debtor in failing circumstances to prefer one creditor to another, in an assignment; and so this Court decided in the case of *Embry vs. Fishcheser,*38 Georgia Reports, 245. And if this be done, *bona fide,*it does not make the assignment void, if there be more assigned than will pay the debt. The fact that there may be a surplus in the hands of the assignee, after paying the debt, is not of itself sufficient to make the assignment fraudulent, if the assignment be *bona fide:*27 *Georgia Reports,*385; 18 *Georgia Reports,*668; 7 *Georgia Reports,*275; 1 *Georgia Reports,*176.

This bill sets up no fact inconsistent with these principles, as attendant upon this assignment. True, there is a general charge that the intent was to defraud, but it is well settled that mere general allegations imputing motives of fraud are not sufficient in any case. There must be facts stated which the Court may see are inconsistent with a fair and *bona fide*intent.

Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Time and Date:

11 a.m., Friday, November 9, 2007.

# Place:

1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room.

# Status:

Closed.

# Matters to be Considered:

Surveillance Matters.

# Contact Person for More Information:

Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

David A. Stawick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 07-5179  Filed 10-16-07; 4:41 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-M
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50242

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FERNANDO BARRAZA-REVELES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:13-CR-1106-1

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Fernando BarrazaReveles has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Barraza-Reveles has not filed a response. We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 14, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50242 Document: 00513758729 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/14/2016
No. 16-50242

2

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50242 Document: 00513758729 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/14/2016
Case 7:07-cv-03508-MDF Document 2 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. PARKS

No. 215 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 514.

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under . G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 10



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



The Board of Directors
Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form F-3 (No. 333-56878) and Form S-8 (No. 333-89849) of Chartered Semiconductor
Manufacturing Ltd and subsidiaries of our report dated February 1, 2001,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Chartered Semiconductor
Manufacturing Ltd and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss),
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in the December 31, 2000,
annual report on Form 20-F of Chartered Semiconductor Manufacturing Ltd and
subsidiaries.




/s/ KPMG
--------------------------
KPMG
Singapore


March 21, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 5729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and 
Alcoholism Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: March 2, 2007.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn Bethesda, 7335 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Katrina Foster, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, National Inst. on Alcohol Abuse & Alcoholism, 
National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Rm. 3037, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-443-3037, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c9a2a8bdbba0a7a889a4a8a0a5e7a7a0a1e7aea6bf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="563d3722243f3837163b373f3a78383f3e78313920">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.271, 
Alcohol Research Career Development Awards for Scientists and 
Clinicians; 93.272, Alcohol National Research Service Awards for 
Research Training; 93.273, Alcohol Research Programs; 93.891, 
Alcohol Research Center Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: January 31, 2007.
Anna Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-518 Filed 2-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### STATE v. LITTLE

No. 31.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 228.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 9 February 1972.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      17,569,792
<SECURITIES>                                 8,431,121
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,232,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                   506,000
<INVENTORY>                                    233,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            51,650,470
<PP&E>                                      17,642,919
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,294,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              67,512,679
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       29,167,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,975
<OTHER-SE>                                  33,760,703
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                67,512,679
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,231,216
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,247,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,494,773
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             124,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,701,575
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,516,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,185,575
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,185,575
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                         409,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               418,161
<PP&E>                                           2,708
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,528)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,240
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       205,995
<OTHER-SE>                                     630,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,091
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,318
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,213)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.003)


</TABLE>
# C_2011005EN.01001101.xml

| 8.1.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/11

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2011/C 5/09

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Lever arch mechanisms | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 1136/2006 (OJ L 205, 27.7.2006, p. 1) | 28.7.2011 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry

Lever arch mechanisms

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 1136/2006 (OJ L 205, 27.7.2006, p. 1)

28.7.2011

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

---
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Efstratios-Georgios (Takis) A. Arapoglou, certify that:

Date: July 15, 2009

/s/ Efstratios-Georgios (Takis) A. Arapoglou Efstratios-Georgios (Takis) A. Arapoglou Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


---



CERTIFICATION

I,
Ioannis G. Pechlivanidis, certify that:

Date: July 15, 2009

/s/ Ioannis G. Pechlivanidis Ioannis G. Pechlivanidis Vice-Chairman and
Deputy Chief Executive Officer


---



CERTIFICATION

I,
Anthimos Thomopoulos, certify that:

Date: July 15, 2009

/s/ Anthimos Thomopoulos Anthimos Thomopoulos Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operations Officer


---



QuickLinks
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ALVIN C. THOMPSON,

 Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv74/MCR/MD

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

 Defendant.

O R D E R

This cause is before the court upon plaintiff’s response (doc. 15) to this court’s order

(doc. 10) requiring him to show cause why this civil rights action should not be dismissed

for failure to comply with an order of the court, namely, the court’s March 23, 2010 order

(doc. 9) requiring plaintiff to either pay the filing fee or file a complete application to

proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff indicates in his response that he requires additional

time to comply with the order due to the prison’s delay in processing his request for

required financial documentation. Good cause having been shown, the court will grant

plaintiff an extension of time.

Accordingly it is ORDERED: 

On or before June 14, 2010 plaintiff shall either pay the $350.00 filing fee, or submit

a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis as instructed in this court’s March 23,

2010 order (doc. 9). Failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this case be

dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12 day of May, 2010. th

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

#### as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Koss Corporation (the “Company”)for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael J. Koss,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Michael J. Koss         |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Michael J. Koss             |
|   | Chief Executive Officer and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer     |
|   | Date: May 15, 2008     |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and is not being filed as part of the Report or asa separate disclosure document.

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JOSEPHINE YVETE WILLIAMS;

EVA R. WILLIAMS-BROWN f/k/a EVA R. 

WELTE; ROSEMARY COX; DARRELL

D. GRIFFIN; and those other that are

similarly situated,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv43/RS-GRJ

ANCHORAGE CHILDREN’S HOME OF

BAY COUNTY, INC. and BIG BEND

COMMUNITY BASED CARE, INC.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is the Stipulation Of Dismissal With Prejudice Of Plaintiffs’ Claims

Against Big Bend Community Based Care, Inc. (Doc. 105).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant Big Bend Community Based Care,

Inc. are dismissed with prejudice.

2. Defendant Big Bend Community Based Care, Inc. is dropped as a party to

this case.

ORDERED on January 7, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### STATE v. GRIFFIN

No. 443P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 709.

Petition by defendant for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1982.
Reduce your dust exposure

Tying bulk or mini-bags

Did you know?

Folding bulk or mini-bag loading collars 

away from your breathing zone can

reduce peaks in respirable dust exposure 

up to 92%

When tying, fold bag

collars away from you

Findings based on NIOSH field studies

To learn more, visit go.usa.gov/xRkXu

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational

Safety and Health
Case 7:07-cv-03509-SCR-LMS Document 5 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 1