alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011094EN.01002101.xml

| 26.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/21

---

Publication concerning Irish Nationwide Building Society pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions

2011/C 94/14

IN THE MATTER OF IRISH NATIONWIDE BUILDING SOCIETY AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CREDIT INSTITUTIONS (STABILISATION) ACT 2010 (‘THE ACT’)

IN THE MATTER OF IRISH NATIONWIDE BUILDING SOCIETY AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CREDIT INSTITUTIONS (STABILISATION) ACT 2010 (‘THE ACT’)

The High Court of Ireland did on 8 day of February 2011 make a direction order, as amended on 11 February 2011, (‘the direction order’), inter alia, directing, pursuant to Section 9 of the Act:

| 1. | Irish Nationwide Building Society (‘INBS’) to take certain steps in connection with an auction process to be operated by the National Treasury Management Agency in respect of the transfer of certain of INBS’s deposits and assets with immediate effect; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Irish Nationwide Building Society (‘INBS’) to take certain steps in connection with an auction process to be operated by the National Treasury Management Agency in respect of the transfer of certain of INBS’s deposits and assets with immediate effect;

| 2. | INBS to take certain procedural steps (and to procure that its affiliated companies do likewise) pursuant to the Joint EC Restructuring and Work-Out Plan for Anglo and INBS submitted on 31 January 2011 to the European Commission including any variations thereof as directed and approved by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

INBS to take certain procedural steps (and to procure that its affiliated companies do likewise) pursuant to the Joint EC Restructuring and Work-Out Plan for Anglo and INBS submitted on 31 January 2011 to the European Commission including any variations thereof as directed and approved by the European Commission.

And the Court did declare the direction order a reorganisation measure for the purposes of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001.

Pursuant to Section 11 of the Act, an application may be made, on the conditions set out therein, to the High Court of Ireland, at the Four Courts, Inns Quay, Dublin 7, Ireland, by motion on notice grounded on affidavit, not later than five working days after the making of the direction order for the setting aside of the direction order.

Pursuant to Section 64(2) of the Act, no appeal lies from the direction order to the Supreme Court without leave of the High Court.

Full copies of the order are available from the Central Office of the High Court by e-mail to: listroomhighcourt@courts.ie

---
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 15 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 15 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 2 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 15 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 3 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 15 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 4 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 15 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 5 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 15 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 6 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 15 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 7 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 15 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 8 of 9
Case 1:07-cv-03536-GEL Document 15 Filed 07/18/2007 Page 9 of 9
#### PRENTICE v. ROBERTS

No. 102 PC.

Case below: 32 N.C. App. 379.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A.-31 denied 13 June 1977.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 3, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 56396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of ConnectAJet.com, Inc.; Order of Suspension of 
Trading

 October 1, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that the 
market for the securities of ConnectAJet.com, Inc. (``ConnectAJet'') 
may be reacting to manipulative forces or deceptive practices and that 
there is a lack of current and accurate information about ConnectAJet 
upon which an informed investment decision can be made. It also appears 
that there may be inaccurate assertions by ConnectAJet in publicly-
disseminated press releases and on ConnectAJet's Web site about, among 
other things, the existence of the company's partnerships and 
affiliations with aviation companies.
    ConnectAJet was quoted on the Pink Sheet under the ticker symbol 
CAJT. Recently, there have been advertisements in newspapers and on 
television, information mailers, spam e-mails and a blast fax touting 
the company's shares.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of the above-listed company.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the above-listed 
company is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT, October 1, 2007 
through 11:59 p.m. EDT, on October 12, 2007.

    By the Commission.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 07-4916 Filed 10-1-07; 11:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03304-KMK-LMS Document 6 Filed 05/29/2007 Page 4 of 4
#### TRUST CO. v. ELZEY

No. 165 PC.

Case below: 26 N.C. App. 29.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 25 August 1975.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DAVID EUGENE GRAHAM,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-65-RS-GRJ

J T WITALEC, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court on Doc. 41, Defendants’ first motion to dismiss. 

Before the Court rules on this matter, the Plaintiff shall have an opportunity to respond. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

That Plaintiff shall have until June 1, 2011, to respond to the motion to dismiss.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2 day of May 2011. 

nd

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 5:10-cv-00065-RS-GRJ Document 42 Filed 05/02/11 Page 1 of 1
# C_2012143EN.01014701.xml

| 22.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/147 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/147

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Amended Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2001/83/EC, as regards information to the general public on medicinal products subject to medicinal prescription and as regards pharmacovigilance’

COM(2011) 633 final — 2008/0256 (COD)

2012/C 143/31

On 28 November 2011, the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 114 and Article 168(2)(c) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Amended Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2001/83/EC, as regards information to the general public on medicinal products subject to medicinal prescription and as regards pharmacovigilance

Amended Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2001/83/EC, as regards information to the general public on medicinal products subject to medicinal prescription and as regards pharmacovigilance

COM(2011) 633 final – 2008/0256 (COD).

Since the Committee has already set out its views on the subject of the proposal in question in its opinion CESE 1022/2009, adopted on 10 June 2009 (1), it decided, at its 478th plenary session of 22 and 23 February 2012 (meeting of 22 February), by 135 votes in favour with 7 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.

1

Brussels, 22 February 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---

(1)  OJ C 306, 16.12.2009, p. 18.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

STATE OF FLORIDA, by and )

 through PAM BONDI, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

 v. ) Case No. 3:10-cv-91-RV/EMT

)

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT )

 OF HEALTH AND HUMAN )

 SERVICES, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

NOTICE OF APPEAL

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendants, the United States Department of Health and

Human Services; Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human

Services; the United States Department of the Treasury; Timothy F. Geithner, in his official

capacity as Secretary of the Treasury; the United States Department of Labor; and Hilda L. Solis,

in her official capacity as Secretary of Labor, hereby appeal to the United States Court of

Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from the Final Summary Declaratory Judgment (Doc. 151) and

Order Granting Summary Judgment (Doc. 150) granting summary judgment in part to plaintiffs

and denying summary judgment in part to defendants, entered in this action on January 31, 2011,

as clarified by the Order (Doc. 167) entered in this action on March 3, 2011; and from all

previous rulings in this action, including the Order and Memorandum Opinion (Doc. 79) denying

in part defendants’ motion to dismiss, entered in this action on October 14, 2010.

Dated: March 8, 2011 Respectfully submitted,

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV -EMT Document 169 Filed 03/08/11 Page 1 of 3
TONY WEST

Assistant Attorney General

IAN HEATH GERSHENGORN

Deputy Assistant Attorney General

THOMAS F. KIRWIN 

United States Attorney

SHEILA LIEBER

Deputy Director

 /s/ Eric Beckenhauer 

BRIAN KENNEDY

Senior Trial Counsel, D.C. Bar No. 228726

ERIC B. BECKENHAUER, Cal. Bar No. 237526

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch

20 Massachusetts Ave. NW

Washington, DC 20530

Telephone: (202) 514-3338

Facsimile: (202) 616-8470

E-mail: eric.beckenhauer@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for Defendants

2

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV -EMT Document 169 Filed 03/08/11 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on March 8, 2011, the foregoing document was filed with the Clerk

of Court via the CM/ECF system, causing it to be served on Plaintiffs’ counsel of record.

 /s/ Eric B. Beckenhauer 

ERIC B. BECKENHAUER

Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV -EMT Document 169 Filed 03/08/11 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 5722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-536]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Interest Rate on Overdue Debts

    Section 30.13 of the Department of Health and Human Services' 
claims collection regulations (45 CFR Part 30) provides that the 
Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest as fixed by the 
Secretary of the Treasury after taking into consideration private 
consumer rates of interest prevailing on the date that HHS becomes 
entitled to recovery. The rate generally cannot be lower than the 
Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable 
rate determined from the ``Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with 
Range of Maturities.'' This rate may be revised quarterly by the 
Secretary of the Treasury and shall be published quarterly by the 
Department of Health and Human Services in the Federal Register.
    The Secretary of the Treasury has certified a rate of 12\1/2\% for 
the quarter ended December 31, 2006. This interest rate will remain in 
effect until such time as the Secretary of the Treasury notifies HHS of 
any change.

    Dated: January 30, 2007.
Jean Augustine,
Director, Office of Financial Policy and Reporting.
[FR Doc. 07-536 Filed 2-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-M
# C_2012351EN.01009101.xml

| 15.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/91 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/91

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2008/971/EC as regards the inclusion of forest reproductive material of the “qualified” category within the scope of that Decision and the updating of the name of the authorities responsible for the approval and control of the production’

COM(2012) 355 final — 2012/172 (COD)

2012/C 351/22

On 5 June 2012 the Council and, on the same day, the European Parliament decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2008/971/EC as regards the inclusion of forest reproductive material of the ‘qualified’ category within the scope of that Decision and the updating of the name of the authorities responsible for the approval and control of the production

Proposal for a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Decision 2008/971/EC as regards the inclusion of forest reproductive material of the ‘qualified’ category within the scope of that Decision and the updating of the name of the authorities responsible for the approval and control of the production

COM(2012) 355 final — 2012/l72 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the content of the proposal, it decided, at its 483rd plenary session of 18 and 19 September 2012 (meeting of 18 September), by 145 votes to 3 with 5 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 18 September 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”), that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: March 30, 2011








By: /s/Samuel R. Newborn


Samuel R. Newborn


principal executive officer














Date: March 30, 2011





By: /s/Bruce R. Foster


Bruce R. Foster


Executive Vice President and


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and will be retained by 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-13 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-13 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-13 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-13 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-13 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 57-13 Filed 09/21/2007 Page 6 of 6
CERTIFICATION OF
                      TREASURER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, the undersigned, Samir N. Masri, who is
the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Lincoln International Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2005, (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Sec.13(a) or Sec.15(d) as applicable, of the Securities
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                    /s/ SAMIR N. MASRI
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Samir N. Masri
                                    Title: Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                    Date:  August 22, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000057497
<NAME> THE LAMSON & SESSIONS CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                             703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     43,593
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,206
<PP&E>                                         115,565
<DEPRECIATION>                                  64,668
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 171,466
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,422
<BONDS>                                         44,843
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,344
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   171,466
<SALES>                                         67,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,198
<CGS>                                           51,746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,601
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,724
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,724
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Laredo  Investment  Corp. on Form 10-KSB
for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc Casavant,  Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



By: /s/ Marc Casavant
Marc Casavant, CFO, Director
Date: April 13, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LEE EDWARD JONES,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv51/RH/EMT

WALTER A. McNEIL,

Respondent.

_______________________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s Motion For Voluntary Dismissal of his habeas

petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 5). As grounds for dismissal, Petitioner states he

has not exhausted his state court remedies with respect to all of his claims (id.). Petitioner requests

dismissal of this habeas action without prejudice to his refiling at a future time (id.). 

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that an action may be dismissed without an order of the court

by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before the adverse party serves an answer, or files a

motion for summary judgment. Because Respondent has not yet served an answer in the instant

case, it is clear that Petitioner is automatically entitled to a voluntary dismissal at this time. The

dismissal should be without prejudice to Petitioner’s refiling the petition when his all of his claims

have been exhausted. However, Petitioner should be aware of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), which

establishes a one-year period of limitation for applications for writs of habeas corpus challenging

state court judgments. The one-year period normally runs from date upon which the conviction

became final, see § 2244(d)(1), but the time during which a “properly filed” application for state

post-conviction or other collateral review is pending is not counted. See § 2244(d)(2); Artuz v.

Bennett, 531 U.S. 4, 121 S. Ct. 361, 148 L. Ed. 2d 213 (2000). Furthermore, Petitioner is advised

that the pendency of the instant federal habeas action does not toll the one-year limitations period

set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). See Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167, 181, 121 S. Ct. 2120, 150
Page 2 of 2

L. Ed. 2d 251 (2001) (construing 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2)). Additionally, the fact that the petition

is dismissed without prejudice does not preclude a determination that a subsequently filed § 2254

petition is untimely or otherwise procedurally barred.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That Petitioner’s Motion For Voluntary Dismissal (Doc. 5) be GRANTED and this action

dismissed without prejudice.

At Pensacola, Florida, this 12th day of April 2010.

/s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed within

fourteen (14) days after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may appear

on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only. A copy of objections shall be

served upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No.: 5:10cv51/RH/EMT