alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 202 (Friday, October 19, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59334-59335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5162]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Clinical Science Research and Development Service Cooperative 
Studies Scientific Merit Review Board; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Clinical Science Research and Development Service Cooperative Studies 
Scientific Merit Review Board will be held on December 12, 2007, at the 
Saint Gregory Hotel, 2033 M Street, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting is 
scheduled to begin at 8 a.m. and end at 5 p.m.
    The Board advises the Chief Research and Development Officer 
through the Director of the Clinical Science Research and Development 
Service on the relevance and feasibility of proposed projects and the 
scientific validity and propriety of technical details, including 
protection of human subjects.
    The session will be open to the public from 8 a.m. to 8:30 a.m. for 
the discussion of administrative matters and the general status of the 
program. The session will be closed from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. for the 
Board's review of research and development applications.
    During the closed portion of the meeting, discussions and 
recommendations will deal with qualifications of personnel conducting 
the studies, staff and consultant critiques of research proposals and

[[Page 59335]]

similar documents, and the medical records of patients who are study 
subjects, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. As provided by section 10(d) 
of Public Law 92-463, as amended, closing portions of this meeting is 
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and (c)(9)(B).
    Those who plan to attend should contact Dr. Grant Huang, Deputy 
Director, Cooperative Studies Program (125), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, at (202) 254-
0183.

    Dated: October 15, 2007.
    By Direction of the Secretary.
E. Philip Riggin,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 07-5162 Filed 10-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C.  Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Sickle Cell Disease Advisory Committee.

The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the meeting.

*Name of Committee:*                         Sickle Cell Disease Advisory Committee.                    

*Date:*                         October 29, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         Discussion of Programs and Issues.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Conference Room 9112/9116, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Robert B Moor, PhD, Health Scientist Administrator, Blood Diseases Program, Division of Blood Disease and Resources, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 10162, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/435-0050.                    

                        Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home page:                         *www.nhlbi.nih.gov/​meetings/​index.htm,*                         where an agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted when available.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 933.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: October 3, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5084 Filed 10-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00716-CR

Robert Jamison, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-07-301448, HONORABLE BRENDA P. KENNEDY, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted appellant Robert Jamison of felony assault, family violence,

enhanced with a prior conviction for delivery of a controlled substance, and sentenced him to seven

years’ imprisonment. Appellant’s appointed attorney has filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit.

Counsel’s brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 743-44

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988); Anders, 386 U.S. at

743-44; High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978);Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d

684, 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137, 138 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969).

Appellant’s attorney sent appellant a copy of the brief and advised him that he had the right to
No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should appellant wish to seek further review of 1

his case by the court of criminal appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for

discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. See generally Tex. R. App.

P. 68-79 (governing proceedings in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals). Any petition for

discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the date

this Court overrules the last timely motion for rehearing filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. The

petition must be filed with this Court, after which it will be forwarded to the court of criminal

appeals along with the rest of the filings in the cause. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.3, 68.7. Any petition

for discretionary review should comply with rules 68.4 and 68.5 of the rules of appellate procedure.

See Tex. R. App. P. 68.4, 68.5. 

2

examine the record and file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Jackson v. State,

485 S.W.2d 553, 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972). No pro se brief has been filed.

We have considered the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. We have reviewed the evidence presented to the jury and the

procedures that were observed and find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm the judgment of conviction.1

___________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Pemberton

Affirmed

Filed: May 7, 2010

Do Not Publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      17,129,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,696,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 15,169,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            52,749,000
<PP&E>                                      46,972,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,233,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,488,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,777,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,952,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,657,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,488,000
<SALES>                                    138,103,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           138,103,000
<CGS>                                      119,514,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,115,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,007,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,039,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,968,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,468,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .75
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Thomas F. Cooke, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Saratoga Resources, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Saratoga Resources, Inc.





By:  /s/ Thomas F. Cooke

Name: Thomas F. Cooke

Title:   Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 14, 2010
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 2 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 3 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 4 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 5 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 6 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 7 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 8 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 9 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 10 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 11 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 12 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 13 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 14 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 15 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 16 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 17 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 18 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 19 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 20 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 21 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 22 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 23 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 24 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 25 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 26 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 27 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 28 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 29 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 30 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 31 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 32 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 33 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 34 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 35 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 36 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 37 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 38 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 39 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 40 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 41 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 42 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 43 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 44 of 45
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 12-4 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 45 of 45
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 2 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 3 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 4 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 5 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 6 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 7 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 8 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 9 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 10 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 11 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 12 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 13 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 14 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 15 of 16
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 16 of 16
Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 11Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 11/29/10 Page 2 of 11Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 11/29/10 Page 3 of 11Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 11/29/10 Page 4 of 11Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 11/29/10 Page 5 of 11Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 11/29/10 Page 6 of 11Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 11/29/10 Page 7 of 11Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 11/29/10 Page 8 of 11Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 11/29/10 Page 9 of 11Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 11/29/10 Page 10 of 11Case 5:10-cv-00083-RS-GRJ Document 21 Filed 11/29/10 Page 11 of 11
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

LE'VIETA DOSTER, 

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 5:10cv50-MCR/WCS

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, 

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation. (Doc. 25). The Plaintiff has previously been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a de novo

determination of those portions to which an objection has been made.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should

be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s Petition for attorney’s fees (doc. 22) is GRANTED and the

Secretary shall certify and pay to Plaintiff $3,990.00 as a reasonable attorney and

paralegal fee.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of January, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
#### Rita Brooks, Appellant, *v.*Erie County Savings Bank, Respondent.

*Brooks*v. *Erie County Savings Bank,*169 App. Div. 73, affirmed.

(Argued October 10, 1918;

decided October 29, 1918.)

Appeal from a judgment, entered August *1%*1915, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and directing a dismissal of the complaint. This action was brought against the respondent, Erie County Savings Bank, and Charles F. Brooks, husband of plaintiff, to recover the sum of $900, with interest, being one-half of the amount of a check drawn by the defendant Brooks upon an account shown in the pass book issued to the plaintiff and the defendant Brooks as payable to *“*Mrs. Rita Brooks or C. F. Brooks,” and upon the signature book of the defendant bank signed by both plaintiff and defendant Brooks as “ Mrs. Rita Brooks or C. F. Brooks, pay to either.” The payment was made by the respondent to Mr. Brooks without the presentation of the pass book. The defendant Charles F. Brooks made default in pleading and the issues were tried against the respondent alone.

*Irving W. Cole*and *Louis Braunlein*for appellant.

*S. Fay Carr, Henry W. Sprague*and *Adelbert Moot*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Cuddeback, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, David D. Clark, the Chief Financial Officer of NutriSystem, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that based on the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | The Companys Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 6, 2009



/S/ DAVID D. CLARKExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

BOBBY RAY GRADY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv57-RH/WCS

THERESA E. BAKER,

Defendant.

___________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 7) and the objections (document 8). I have reviewed

de novo the issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The complaint is dismissed with

prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 17, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHASITY PERRY,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-52/RS-MD

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

STATE OF FLORIDA

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 33) and 

Memorandum in Support (Doc. 35), and Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. 45) and Statement of 

Disputed Facts (Doc. 46). 

In the light most favorable to the Plaintiff, sufficient facts have been produced to 

raise a triable issue as to both the sexual harassment and retaliation claims. Plaintiff has 

sufficiently refuted Defendant’s contention that she failed to adequately avail herself of 

Defendant’s system for reporting and preventing harassment by alleging that, on multiple 

occasions, she informed her superiors, including Warden Culpepper, of the alleged 

harassment. Likewise, Plaintiff has demonstrated that there is a genuine issue of material 

fact as to the nature of her discharge from employment sufficient to sustain her retaliation 

claim. 

The Motion for Summary Judgment (Docs. 33 and 35) is DENIED. 
ORDERED on November 9, 2010

 /S/ Richard Smoak

 RICHARD SMOAK

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RICHARD ROSS,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00032-MP-AK

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court upon a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. Doc. 1. Petitioner is currently incarcerated at the Florida State Prison in Raiford,

Florida, and challenges his conviction out of the Circuit Court of Miami-Dade County, Florida. 

Jurisdiction is therefore appropriate in either the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Florida or in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, as

the districts of confinement and conviction, respectively. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). 

The district of conviction would appear to be the most convenient forum for witnesses

should an evidentiary hearing be necessary, and therefore, transfer of this case to the Southern

District is appropriate. Mitchell v. Henderson, 432 F.2d 435, 436 (5th Cir. 1970) (division of

conviction, where witnesses were located, was appropriate venue over division of confinement in

challenge to conviction); Parker v. Singletary, 974 F.2d 1562, 1582, n. 118 (11th Cir. 1992)

(courts should give careful consideration to convenience of witnesses in transferring habeas
Page 2 of 2

1:10-cv-00032-MP-AK

corpus petitions under § 2241(d)). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

That this case be TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Florida for all further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of March, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
#### RHOADS v. BRYANT

No. 261P82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 635.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 13 July 1982.