alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ANTHONY DALE MCBRIDE,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No.: 3:10cv82/RV/EMT

KENNETH S. TUCKER,

Respondent.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated February 17, 2012 (doc. 40). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 3) is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of March, 2012.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:10-cv-00082-RV-EMT Document 43 Filed 03/16/12 Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. KELLY

No. 28 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 588.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 4 April 1972.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case Nos.: 3:01cr8/RV

 3:13cv451/RV/EMT

WALTER DEVON GRANDISON

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated August 13, 2013 (doc. 208). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely

filed objection (doc. 210) .

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objection thereto,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc.

207) is SUMMARILY DISMISSED. 

3. No certificate of appealability shall be issued.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of August, 2013.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 12

<TABLE>

STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF RATIOS
Aeroquip-Vickers, Inc.
(In thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>

                                 Nine Months
                                    Ended               Year Ended December 31
                                 September 30--------------------------------------------
                                     1997     1996     1995     1994     1993     1992
                                 ------------  ----    ----      ----     ----     ----

<S>                              <C>          <C>      <C>       <C>      <C>       <C>
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
  CHARGES

Income before income taxes and
  cumulative effect of accounting
  change                        $101,228   $153,421 $128,196  $101,255$ 17,111 $ 24,042
Dividends received, net of equity
  in earnings (loss) of 
  unconsolidated affiliates        1,433      9,961   (3,704)    1,213       1   (1,931)
Fixed charges                     33,445     41,712   31,762    30,249  33,370   34,623
                                --------   -------- --------  ---------------- --------

Income before cumulative effect
  of accounting change for
  computation purposes          $136,106   $205,094 $156,254  $132,717$ 50,482 $ 56,734
                                ========   ======== ========  ================ ========

FIXED CHARGES

Interest expense, including
  interest related to corporate
  owned life insurance          $ 28,712   $ 34,963 $ 24,477  $ 22,582$ 25,516 $ 26,313
Portion of rent expense
  representing interest            4,461      6,288    6,903     7,303   7,490    7,987
Amortization of debt expense
  and debt discount                  272        461      382       364     364      323
                                --------   -------- --------  ---------------- --------
Total fixed charges             $ 33,445   $ 41,712 $ 31,762  $ 30,249$ 33,370 $ 34,623
                                ========   ======== ========  ================ ========

Ratio of Earnings to 
  Fixed Charges                     4.1x       4.9x     4.9x      4.4x    1.5x     1.6x
                                ========   ======== ========  ================ ========


<FN>
For the purpose of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges,
"earnings" consist of income before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change, plus fixed charges and dividends received, net of equity in
earnings (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates.  Fixed charges consists of
interest expense, the portion of rent expense representing interest and
amortization of debt discount.  

</FN>
</TABLE>

-20-
# C_2011241EN.01000801.xml

| 19.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/8

---

Communication from the Commission relating to the available quantity for the September 2011 subperiod in the framework of certain quotas opened by the European Union for products in the rice sector

2011/C 241/05

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 (1) opened tariff quotas for the import of rice originating in the overseas countries and territories (OCT). No import licence applications have been submitted during the first seven days of May 2011 for the quotas with order number 09.4189 and 09.4190.

1

In accordance with the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities for which applications are not submitted are to be added to the following subperiod.

2

In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 1(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 quantities available in the following subperiod are communicated by the Commission before the 25th day of the last month of a given subperiod.

As a result, the total available quantity for the September 2011 subperiod under the quotas with order number 09.4189 and 09.4190 as referred to in Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009 are set out in the Annex to this communication.

---

(1)  OJ L 344, 23.12.2009, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

Quantities available for the following subperiod under Regulation (EU) No 1274/2009

| Origin | Order number | Import licence applications introduced for the May 2011 subperiod | Total available quantity for the September 2011 subperiod (in kg) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Netherlands Antilles and Aruba | 09.4189 | (1) | 25 000 000 |
| Least developed OCTs | 09.4190 | (1) | 10 000 000 |

Origin

Order number

Import licence applications introduced for the May 2011 subperiod

Total available quantity for the September 2011 subperiod (in kg)

Netherlands Antilles and Aruba

09.4189

(1)

25 000 000

Least developed OCTs

09.4190

(1)

10 000 000

---

(1)  No allocation coefficient for this subperiod: no licence applications were sent to the Commission.

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gregory J. Divis, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2011 |  | /s/ Gregory J. Divis                 
|                     |  | Gregory J. Divis                     
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as our exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2249 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2249

       To allow the Deputy Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
  Administration on the date of enactment of this Act to continue to 
                  serve as such Deputy Administrator.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2019

    Mr. Wicker introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To allow the Deputy Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
  Administration on the date of enactment of this Act to continue to 
                  serve as such Deputy Administrator.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY FOR CONTINUATION OF SERVICE OF THE DEPUTY 
              ADMINISTRATOR OF THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--An individual serving as Deputy Administrator of 
the Federal Aviation Administration on the date of enactment of this 
Act may continue to serve as such Deputy Administrator, without regard 
to the restrictions specified in the 5th sentence of section 106(d)(1) 
of title 49, United States Code.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
as approval by Congress of any future appointments of military persons 
to the Offices of Administrator and Deputy Administrator of the Federal 
Aviation Administration.
                                 <all>
```
#### ALICE HENKLE RHYNE v. C. DALE CLARK, CHARLES C. CLEGG, LEO FULLER, FRANK L. RANKIN, J. B. THOMPSON, V. A. HOWARD, Trustees of Church Property of THE FIRST METHODIST CHURCH OF MOUNT HOLLY, NORTH CAROLINA.

(Filed 27 September, 1961.)

1. Pleadings §§ 15, 18—

A demurrer will lie only for defect apparent on the face of the complaint, without consideration of facts alleged in the answer, and when it is not apparent on the face of the complaint that there is a defect of parties plaintiff or defendant, or that a necessary party has not been joined, it is error for the court to sustain defendants’ demurrer on the ground that a necessary party had not been joined.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Walker, Special Judge,*August 7, 1961, Term of GastoN.

*419Plaintiff’s action is for injunctive relief and damages.

Plaintiff, in brief summary, alleges: She owns a tract of land in Mount Holly, North Carolina, and an easement or right-of-way over defendants’ adjoining tract for use as a driveway. This driveway has been established and in use by plaintiff and her predecessors in title for more than forty-five years. The driveway was paved and was visible and apparent when defendants acquired title to their property. Defendants, by means of a bulldozer, have “graded away” plaintiff’s said driveway, destroying it to such extent an automobile cannot be driven thereon between the street and plaintiff’s yard and garage.

Defendants answered. They denied the essential allegations of the complaint and alleged four further defenses. In their third further defense, they alleged the plaintiff had conveyed “all her right, title, and interest in the property now owned by the defendants to Henry Henkle Rhyne.”

When the case was called for trial, defendants “demurred ore tenus to the plaintiff’s complaint on the ground that a necessary party had not been joined as plaintiff or defendant.” After hearing, the court “ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the demurrer be and it is sustained and that this action be dismissed.” Plaintiff appealed.

*McDougle, Ervin, Horack & Snepp for plaintiff, appellant.*

*Childers & Fowler and Ernest R. Warren for defendants, appellees.*

Per Cukxam.

“A demurrer lies only when the defect asserted as the ground of demurrer is apparent upon the face of the pleading attacked.” *Construction Co. v. Electrical Workers Union,*246 N.C. 481, 488, 98 S.E. 2d 852; G.S. 1-127; G.S. 1-133. Facts alleged in defendants’ answer may not be considered in passing on the legal sufficiency of the complaint.

Here, the allegations of the complaint do not disclose “a defect of parties plaintiff or defendant.” G.S. 1-127(4). Nor do they disclose “that a necessary party ha(s) not been joined'as plaintiff or defendant.” Hence, the judgment sustaining defendants’ demurrer *ore tenus*and dismissing the action was erroneously entered and is reversed.

Reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              66
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                        76
<INVENTORY>                                      1,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,076
<PP&E>                                           1,218
<DEPRECIATION>                                     732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,131
<BONDS>                                          1,227
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,808
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,638)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,573
<SALES>                                          3,324
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,324
<CGS>                                            2,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  58
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (226)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (226)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
<FN>
<F1>Bad debt expense of 1 is included in the 1,040 reported as Selling and
Administrative expenses.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.6  AMENDMENT NO. 2 TOLUXFER HOLDINGS PLC LONG-TERM UMBRELLA INCENTIVE PLAN  The Luxfer Holdings PLC Long-Term Umbrella Incentive Plan (the Plan) is hereby amended effective as of March 28, 2013 as follows:  1.By deleting Section 2(r) of the Plan in its entirety and replacing it by the following:  (r)Fair Market Value means, with respect to a Share, as of the applicable date of determination (i)  (x) for purposes of Sections 3(c) and 6(a) hereof, the closing price per Share on the trading day immediately preceding such date as reported on theNew York Stock Exchangeand (y) for all other purposes, the closing price per Share on that date as reported on theNew York Stock Exchange(or if not reported,  the closing price per Share on the trading day immediately preceding such date as reported on theNew York Stock Exchange) or(ii) if not so reported, as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion using a reasonable valuation method taking into account, to the extent applicable, the requirements of Section 409A of the Code.  2.This amendment shall not affect any other provisions of the Plan and the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ TRIPLE TEE GOLF, INC ., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

TAYLOR MADE GOLF COM PANY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION , Defendant

- Appellee

______________________

2015

- 1564

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:11 -cv- 02974

- JLS

WVG, Judge Janis L. Sammartino.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

J ACQUELINE T ADROS , Jacqueline Tadros, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, FL, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by M ELVIN K ENNETH S ILVERMAN , Melvin K. Silverman & Associates, P.C., Pompano Beach, FL.

B RIDGETTE A. A GNESS , Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendant

appellee. Also represented by G ARY A. C LARK

.______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and cons idered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (O’M ALLEY , C LEVENGER , and B RYSON , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

May 5, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14-4 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14-4 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14-4 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14-4 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 4 of 4
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.3
 GRACECHURCH RECEIVABLES TRUSTEE LIMITED
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Gracechurch Receivables Trustee Limited;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement.
 Name:   Paul Gerard Turner
Title:     Director
Date:     June 23, 2006
 - 28 -
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



| | 1. |  | Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                   
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |  |                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                         |                     |                                                       
|------------------------ | ------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
|                         |                     |                                                       
|Dated:  February 6, 2004 | /S/CRAIG E. LABARGE
|                         |                     | Craig E. LaBarge
Chief Executive Officer and President













Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                           
| | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |  |                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Company.





|                         |  |                                                                
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  February 6, 2004 | 
|                         |  | /S/DONALD H. NONNENKAMP                                        
|                         |  | Donald H. Nonnenkamp
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
ACCEPTED

12-14-00321-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

2/20/2015 12:31:24 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 2/20/2015 12:31:24 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk