alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT OLIVIA VIC KY RIVAS-DE PEREZ; EDWARD ALEXANDER PEREZR IVAS, Pe titione rs, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 10-73165 Age n c y Nos. A098-044-783 A098-044-784 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d April 22, 2015 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, B YB EE, a nd C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. Olivia Vic ky R iva s-De Pe re z and Edwa rd Ale xa nde r Pe re z -R iva s , native s and c itiz e ns of El Sa lva dor, pe t ition for re v ie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing the ir a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) 

# F IL ED APR 27 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).de c ision de ny ing the ir a p p lic ations for a sy lum , withholding of re m ova l, a nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture(“ C AT” ). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge n c y ’ s fa c tua l findings. Silay a v . Muk

ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th C ir. 2008). W e de ny in pa rt a nd gra nt in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w, a nd we re m and. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of C AT re lie f be c a use pe titione rs fa ile d to e sta

b l ish it is m

ore like ly tha

n not tha t the y would betorture d by or with thec onse nt or a c quie sc e nc e of the gove rnm e nt if re turne d to El Sa lva d or. Se e id . at 1073. In de ny ing pe titione rs’ a s y lum and withholding of re

m ova l c la im s , the a ge nc y found pe titione rs fa ile d to e sta blish pa st pe rse c ution or a fe ar of future pe rse c ution on a c c ount of a prote c te d ground. W

he n the IJ a

nd B IA issue d the ir de c isions in this c a se the y did not ha

ve the be ne fit of this c ourt’ s de c isions in He nrique z-Riv as v . Holde r , 707 F.3d 1081 (9th C ir. 2013) (e n ba nc ), C ordoba v
. Holde r , 726 F.3d 1106 (9th C ir. 2013), a n d Pirir-Boc v . Holde r , 750 F.3d 1077 (9th C ir. 2014), or theB IA’ s de c isions in Matte r of M-E-V-G- , 26 I. & N. De c . 227 (B IA 2014), a

nd Matte r of W

-G-R- , 26 I. & N. De c . 208 (B IA 2014). Thus, we re m and pe t itione rs’ a sy lum and withholding of re

m ova l c la i m s to de t e rm i ne the im pa c t, if a ny , of the se de c isions. S

e e IN S v . Ve ntura , 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) 2 1 0 - 7 3 1 6 5(pe r c uriam ). In light of this re m and, we do not re a c h pe titione rs’ re m a i ning c ha lle nge s to thea ge nc y ’ s de nia l of a sy lum an d withholding of re

m ova l. The pa rtie s sha ll be ar the ir own c osts for this petition for re vie w. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; G RANT E D in par t; RE M A NDE D.

3 1 0 - 7 3 1 6 5
<PAGE>

================================================================================
                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-QSB/A

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

    For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2002


                                       OR

[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

    or the transition period from ______________to _______________.

Commission File Number 0-6106

                           UNITED LEISURE CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S>                        <C>                                     <C>
                           Delaware                                              13 - 2652243
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)     (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
</TABLE>


                       1990 Westwood Boulevard, Penthouse
                       Los Angeles, California 90025-4650
          (Address, including zip code, of principal executive offices)

                                 (310) 441-0900
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
           Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act: None

              Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:
                     Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
                                (Title of Class)

Check whether the Issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes [X] No [_]

The number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock outstanding as of
April 30, 2002 was 20,511,375 shares.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (Check one): Yes [_] No [X]
================================================================================


<PAGE>


                                    SIGNATURE

     In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.

                                            UNITED LEISURE CORPORATION


Date        8/19/02                         By          /s/ BRIAN SHUSTER
     -----------------------                   ---------------------------------
                                                           Brian Shuster
                                                Chairman of the Board, President
                                                   and Chief Executive Officer
#### SCOVILL MFG. CO. v. TOWN OF WAKE FOREST

No. 452P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 15.

Petition by plaintiffs for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 25 August 1982.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of
the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Dawn M. Zier, the Chief Executive Officer of Nutrisystem, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that based on the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2018 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: February 28, 2019 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/ DAWN M. ZIER                     
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                      LCS INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE AND
                             COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                     For the Three Months Ended December 31,
                                   (Unaudited)

                                                             Three Months
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                        1997             1996
                                                     ----------       ----------
<S>                                                  <C>              <C>   
Basic earnings per share:

Weighted average shares outstanding ..........        4,746,850        4,533,500
                                                     ==========       ==========


Net income ...................................       $2,587,777       $2,185,575

Basic earnings per share .....................       $      .55       $      .48
                                                     ==========       ==========


Diluted earnings per share:

Weighted average shares outstanding ..........        4,746,850        4,533,500

Weighted average - dilutive stock options ....          376,831          399,271

Shares issuable in connection with the
   acquisition of Catalog Resources, Inc. ....           89,733          160,475
                                                     ----------       ----------
                                                      5,213,414        5,093,246
                                                     ==========       ==========

Net income ...................................       $2,587,777       $2,185,575

Diluted earnings per share and common
   equivalent share ..........................       $      .50       $      .43
                                                     ==========       ==========

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ali Jenab, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
  Annual Report of VA Software Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
  July 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
  Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of VA Software Corporation.

| | By:      /s/ ALI JENAB                                      
| | ------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name: Ali Jenab
Title: Chief Executive Officer and President



72
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60327 Summary Calendar

MILCIADES FELIZ-CRUZ, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A72 838 042

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Milciades Feliz-Cruz (Feliz) petitions this court for review of the BIA’s denial of his motion to reopen removal proceedings. Feliz concedes that he has filed two motions to reopen, but he contends that because his first motion alleged that he was denied notice before the immigration judge issued an in absentia removal order, the first motion should not count against the numerical limitation placed on motions to reopen. Feliz cannot establish that the BIA abused its discretion in denying his most recent motion to reopen as exceeding the numerical limitation on such2

filings. See Altamirano-Lopez v. Gonzales , 435 F.3d 547, 549-50 (5th Cir. 2006); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), (3); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii). Feliz also contends that the BIA abused its discretion by refusing to reopen the case sua sponte, in light of the exceptional circumstances he has shown. Because there is “no legal standard against which to judge an [administrative agency’s] decision not to invoke its sua sponte authority,” we lack jurisdiction to consider this claim. See Enrizquez-Alvarado v. Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 246, 250 (5th Cir. 2004). Feliz’s petition for review is DENIED.
The Chase Manhattan Bank
One Chase Manhattan Plaza, 3rd Floor
New York, NY  10081
                                      January 17, 1997

Mr. Ronald L. Krutzman
Treasurer
Laclede Gas Company
720 Olive Street
St. Louis, MO  63101

Dear Ron:

The Chase Manhattan Bank (the "Bank) is pleased to advise you that it is
prepared to offer a line of credit to Laclede Gas Company (the "Company") up
to the maximum amount of $10,000,000.  The Bank will consider requests for
advances under the line of credit until January 31, 1998.  The purpose of
the line of credit is general corporate purposes.  Accordingly, our officers
may, at their discretion, make short term loans to the Company on such terms
as may be mutually agreed upon from time to time.

Notes issued under this arrangement shall mature not more than ninety days
(90) from date of issuance.  Notes maturing after January 31, 1998, may be
renewed in whole or in part provided no notes mature later than June 30,
1998.  Interest shall be payable at maturity or on the date of any
prepayment.  Notes issued under this arrangement may be prepaid at any time
without penalty.

We ask that you continue to supply us with current financial and other
information, which current information will be furnished to the Bank as it
may from time to time reasonably request.

It is understood that any loans obtained by any subsidiary of the Company
whether or not they are guaranteed by the Company are excluded from this
arrangement and shall not be charged against the credit stated above.

This letter constitutes the entire understanding between the Bank and the
Company, supersedes all prior discussions and  replaces the Bank's letter to
you dated January 16, 1996 regarding a line of credit.

Nothing in this letter is intended to alter the arrangement set forth in the
agreement dated December 23, 1996 or the availability of up to $45,000,000
of advances thereunder from the Bank on the terms set forth in said December
23, 1996 Agreement. 

Please acknowledge your understanding of the above by signing and returning
the attached copy of this letter by February 15, 1997.

                                      The Chase Manhattan Bank
                                      /s/ Michiel V.M. van der Voort
                                      Michiel V.M. van der Voort
                                      Vice President

                                 Page 22<PAGE>
<PAGE>
Acknowledged:
Laclede Gas Company

By:  /s/ Ronald L. Krutzman
Name:  Ronald L. Krutzman
Title: Treasurer



















































                                Page 23
Case 7:07-cv-03541-CLB Document 2 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ROBERT A LOVEDAY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00014-MP-WCS

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 23, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, recommending that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and the

Commissioner be ordered to award benefits. The time for filing objections has passed, and the

Commissioner has not filed objections. 

The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that claimant meets the criteria for

presumptive disability under Listing of Impairments § 12.05(C), based on his low I.Q. test scores

and other impairments. That is, the Court first agrees that no substantial evidence exists to find

that the claimant's I.Q. test results, showing scores of between 60 to 70, were invalid. Second,

as the Magistrate Judge sets out in detail, nothing in the testimony of the claimant or other

evidence shows that the I.Q. score is inconsistent with the claimant's daily activities and

behavior. Finally, the Court agrees that Plaintiff's adjustment disorder, degenerative disc disease

of the cervical region of the spine, left shoulder rotator cuff spring, and idiopathic gastroparesis

represent physical or other mental impairments imposing additional and significant work-related

limitations of function. Accordingly, Plaintiff meets all the requirements of Listing 12.05C,
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:10-cv-00014-MP-WCS

Appendix 1 to Subpart P of Part 404 – Listing of Impairments, 20 C.F.R. and should have been

found disabled at Step 3 by the Administrative Law Judge. It is hereby 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. The decision of the Commissioner, denying benefits, is REVERSED, and the

Commissioner is ordered to award benefits to the Plaintiff.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of November, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 16 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
vir-ex1035_1062.htm



 

 

Exhibit 10.35

 

CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS DOCUMENT, MARKED BY [***], HAS BEEN OMITTED BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM IF PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.

 

 


		
	
AMENDMENT INFORMATION

	
Agreement to be Amended:
	
Grant agreement between the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Vir Biotechnology, Inc. effective March 16, 2018, as amended, and bearing Investment  ID OPP1182112

	
Amendment Purpose:
	
Reporting and Payment Schedule  Change

	
Amendment Date:
	
Date of this email




 

THIS AMENDMENT amends, and is made part of, the above-referenced Agreement and is effective as of the date of this email. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment will have the meaning provided in the Agreement. Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain in full force and effect. In the event    of a conflict between the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment will prevail.

 

 



 

UPDATED REPORTING & PAYMENT SCHEDULE

This Amendment notifies You that the reporting and/or payment schedule for Your grant has changed. Your updated Reporting & Payment Schedule is deleted and replaced with the following:

 


					
	
REPORTING & PAYMENT SCHEDULE

	
Investment Period
	
Target, Milestone, or Reporting Deliverable
	
Due By
	
Payment Date
	
Payment Amount (U.S.$)

	
 
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
 
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
[***]
	
[***]
	
[***]
	
 
	
 

	
Amended Total Grant Amount
	
Up to

$14,882,418.08
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# ACTION:

Announcement of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the 2nd meeting of the American Health Information Community Personalized Healthcare Workgroup in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.).

# DATES:

February 21, 2007, from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Mary C. Switzer Building (330 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20201), Conference Room 4090 (please bring photo ID for entry to a Federal building).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

*http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Workgroup will discuss standards for personalized healthcare and upcoming visioning exercise. For additional information, go to                     *http://www.hhs.gov/​healthit/​ahic/​healthcare/​phc_​instruct.html.*

Dated: January 29, 2007.

Judith Sparrow, 

Director, American Health Information Community, Office of Programs and Coordination, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. 

[FR Doc. 07-515 Filed 2-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-24-M
OAO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

)

v.

WALTER DEVON GRANDISON Case No: 3:01cr8/RV

USM No: 05019-017

Date of Previous Judgment: June 21, 2001 N/A - Pro Se

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of x the defendant 9 the Director of the Bureau of Prisons 9 the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected

the last judgment issued) of 360 months is reduced to 324 months .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 38 Amended Offense Level: 36

Criminal History Category: VI Criminal History Category: VI

Previous Guideline Range: 360 to LIFE Amended Guideline Range: 324 to 405 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

X The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

9 The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time

of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the

amended guideline range.

9 Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

The Eleventh Circuit held, on direct appeal, that the defendant faced a maximum penalty of 30 years (instead of Life), so

his career offender offense level would be 34 (instead of 37), making the recalculated offense level of 36 applicable.

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated 6/21/2001 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: June 18, 2009 /s/ Roger Vinson

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: Roger Vinson, Senior United States District Judge

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

Case 3:01-cr-00008-RV-EMT Document 156 Filed 06/18/09 Page 1 of 1