alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# Time and Date:

10 a.m., Thursday, October 11, 2007.

# Place:

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, 9th Floor, 601 New Jersey Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.

# Status:

Open.

# Matters to be Considered:

                        The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session:                         *Secretary of Labor*                         v.                         *The American Coal Company,*                         Docket Nos. LAKE 2005-129 and LAKE 2006-28. (Issues include whether the Administrative Law Judge erred in concluding that the operator violated the escapeway requirements of 30 CFR 75.380(a).)                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# Contact Person for More Info:

Jean Ellen, (202) 434-9950/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Jean H. Ellen,

Chief Docket Clerk.

[FR Doc. 07-5168  Filed 10-16-07; 12:37 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-M
EXHIBIT 31.2  I, Ted R. Sharp, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date: November 14, 2006   By   /s/ Ted R. Sharp Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer       1
#### IN RE ADAMEE

No. 43 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 229.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 2 March 1976.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 4, 2013 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01322-CV 

JOSE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant 

V. 

MILAS FRANKLIN, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-03664-D 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices O’Neill, Francis, and Fillmore 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeal and render judgment. 

The parties inform the Court that they have settled their differences. They ask that we vacate the 

trial court’s judgment and dismiss the appeal. We grant the parties’ motion. We vacate the trial 

court’s judgment signed on June 29, 2012 and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(a)(2). 

121322F.P05 

 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

JOSE RODRIGUEZ, Appellant 

No. 05-12-01322-CV V. 

MILAS FRANKLIN, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 4, Dallas County, Texas. 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-12-03664-D. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis. 

Justices O’Neill and Fillmore, participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court signed 

on June 29, 2012 is VACATED and the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of the appeal. 

Judgment entered June 4, 2013 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE
Case 1:06-cv-15053-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

vs. Case No. 3:10cr25/MCR

PEDRO D. GONZALEZ

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. R. Crim. P.,

and has entered a plea of guilty to Count I of the Indictment. After cautioning and examining the

Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the

guilty plea was knowing and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by an independent

basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore recommend that

the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence

imposed accordingly.

Dated: April 22, 2010 /s/ Elizabeth M. Timothy 

ELIZABETH M. TIMOTHY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

twenty four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not control. A

copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to object may limit the scope

of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d

698, 701 (11th Cir. 1988).

Case No. 3:10cr25/MCR
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)



I, Eskil Anderson, President and Chief Financial Officer of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, certify that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company.



/s/ Eskil Anderson



DATE:  May 13, 2003

Eskil Anderson, President and

Chief Financial Officer
****Exhibit 32.2****
  **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Katy Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Amir Rosenthal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 ****/s/ Amir RosenthalAmir RosenthalChief Financial OfficerNovember 10, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to Katy Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Katy Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 45
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CLENNON B. EVERETT,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:10-cv-42-RS-GRJ

C. HOLLIS, Correctional Officer,

Defendant.

____________________________ /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This case is before the Court on Doc. 35, Defendant’s motion for summary

judgment. A summary judgment notice was issued to Plantiff advising him that a

response to the motion was due on or before December 8, 2011, and that failure to

respond to the motion would indicate that the motion is unopposed. Doc. 37. The

Notice was mailed to Plaintiff at his last address of record at Everglades CI, but the

Notice was returned to the Court as undeliverable. Doc. 39.

A review of the Department of Corrections Inmate Locator reflects that Plaintiff

was released on January 27, 2012. Plaintiff has failed to file a change of address with

the Court. On July 13, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause on or before

July 23, 2012, as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

That Order was returned as undeliverable. It was remailed by the Clerk to Plaintiff’s

address as reflected in the DOC inmate locator. As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff

has failed to respond. 

 In view of Plaintiff’s failure to oppose the summary judgment motion and failure

to prosecute this case by keeping the Court apprised of his current address, it is

Case 5:10-cv-00042-RS-GRJ Document 42 Filed 07/31/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

respectfully RECOMMENDED that Defendants’ unopposed motion for summary

judgment, Doc. 35, be GRANTED and that judgment be entered in Defendants’ favor.

IN CHAMBERS this 31 day of July 2012. 

st

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 14 days after being

served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of review of

proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case 5:10-cv-00042-RS-GRJ Document 42 Filed 07/31/12 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:10-cv-00091-RV-EMT   Document 28    Filed 04/12/10   Page 1 of 1
#### STATE v. BALDWIN

No. 11 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 232.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 March 1972.
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03499-DC Document 3 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MICHAEL J. LOEBER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09cv402/RS-MD

ERIONG OKON ANDEM, M.D.,

Individually; MARY COLLEEN WAHL,

ARNP, Individually; DELIANA GONZALES

TORRES, M.D., Individually; FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

LARRY CAMPBELL, in his official capacity

as Sheriff of Leon County, Florida; and

PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER

The relief requested by Plaintiff’s Consent Motion To File Response To Motion To

Dismiss On Or Before July 15, 2010, is granted.

ORDERED on July 19, 2010.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# C_2011141EN.01000701.xml

| 12.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/7

---

Commission information notice pursuant to the procedure laid down in Article 17(5) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Invitation to tender in respect of the operation of scheduled air services in accordance with public service obligations as detailed in the information notice published in OJ C 141, 12.5.2011

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 141/07

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Route concerned | Reggio Calabria–Pisa San Giusto and vice-versa |
| Period of validity of the contract | 2 years from 27 June 2011 |
| Deadline for submission of tenders | 2 months after the publication of this information notice |
| Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation is made available free of charge | ENAC (Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile) |
| Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo |
| Viale del Castro Pretorio 118 |
| 00185 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |
| http://www.enac.gov.it |
| E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Route concerned

Reggio Calabria–Pisa San Giusto and vice-versa

Period of validity of the contract

2 years from 27 June 2011

Deadline for submission of tenders

2 months after the publication of this information notice

Address where the text of the invitation to tender and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public tender and the public service obligation is made available free of charge

ENAC (Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile)

Direzione sviluppo trasporto aereo

Viale del Castro Pretorio 118

00185 Roma RM

ITALIA

http://www.enac.gov.it

E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it

---
#### STATE v. ELKINS

No. 265 PC.

Case below: 52 N.C. App. 378.

Petition by State for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 17 August 1981.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MICHAEL SHANE TOWNSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv135-SPM/WCS

J. SPEIGHTS, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes before the court on the magistrate judge’s first and

second report and recommendations. Docs. 13 and 17. Plaintiff has been

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States

Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. I have determined that

the report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendations (docs. 13 and

17) are ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for quick relief (doc. 10), motion for temporary

restraining order (doc. 11) and motion immediate action (doc. 15) are denied.
Page 2 of 2

3. This case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further

proceedings. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of August, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

 CASE NO. 4:10cv135-SPM/WCS
# C_2011212EN.01001901.xml

| 19.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/19

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to which measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/145/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 apply

2011/C 212/08

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in Annex I to Council Decision 2010/145/CFSP and in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004.

The Council of the European Union has determined that the persons that appear in the abovementioned Annex continue to fulfil the criterion set out in Council Decision 2010/145/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004 concerning further measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, and they should consequently remain subject to these measures.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the websites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1763/2004, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the abovementioned list should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| DG K Coordination Unit (10 HN 43) |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

DG K Coordination Unit (10 HN 43)

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2


           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                         RULE 13a-14(b) OR 15d-14(b) AND
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Hawksdale  Financial Visions,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for year ended  December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Thomas Stanley  Babcock,  Treasurer and Chief Financial  Officer and Director of
the Company,  certifies for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule
15d-14(b)  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  (the  "Exchange  Act") and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, that:

     1.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

     2.   the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Dated: August 26, 2004                    By:  /s/ THOMAS STANLEY BABCOCK
                                          _____________________________________
                                          Thomas Stanley Babcock
                                          Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                          and Director
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0001091 10-FEB-2015 08:41 AM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7129

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALEJANDRO LONGORIA, a/k/a John, a/k/a Felix Longoria,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cr-00505-CMC-2)

Submitted: January 27, 2022 Decided: February 8, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alejandro Longoria, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alejandro Longoria appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a 

sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 404, 132 

Stat. 5194. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We therefore affirm 

the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JONATHAN THOMAS SCHMIDT,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 4:09cv514-MP/WCS

WARDEN, MILTON HICKS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before me upon referral from the Clerk. In an order filed January 5,

2010, Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint by February 5, 2010. Plaintiff

was specifically warned that a recommendation would be made that this case be

dismissed if there was a failure to comply with that order. Doc. 5. To date, no response

has been received from the Plaintiff. 

A trial court has inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to

prosecute. Link v. Wabash R.R., 370 U.S. 626, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 8 L.Ed.2d 734 (1962). 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failure to obey a

court order. Moon v. Newsome, 863 F.2d 835, 838 and cases cited (11th Cir.), cert.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:09cv514-MP/WCS

denied, 493 U.S. 863 (1989). Since Plaintiff has failed to comply with an order or to

prosecute this case, this complaint should now be dismissed without prejudice. 

Plaintiff shall have a 15 day period after service of this report and

recommendation in which to file objections. This will also afford Plaintiff a final

opportunity to show good cause for this failure to respond. Plaintiff may do so by filing a

motion for reconsideration which will be referred to me by the Clerk.

It is therefore, respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED

without prejudice and the pending motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, doc. 2,

be DENIED as moot.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on February 17, 2010.

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.