alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Asia4sale.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Montandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

February 24, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner

v.

ASHER BROOKS CHANCEY

,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2647 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 153 DB 2019

Attorney Registration No. 205 0 29

(Philadelphia)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25 th day of June, 2020, upon consideration of the

Recommendation of the Three

- Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint Petition

in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted, and Asher Brooks Chancey is suspended

on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of t hree years, retroactive to

September 9, 2019 . Respondent shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217

and pay costs to the Disciplinary Board. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 10, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00812

- CV

CHRISTUS SPOHN HEALTH SYSTEM CORP. d/b/a Christus Spohn Hospi tal Kleberg

, Appellant

v.

Melissa HERNANDEZ

, Appellee

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 03

- 52114

- CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The en banc court has considered Appellee’s motion for en banc reconsideration; the

motion is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.7.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
#### COLLEGE v. THORNE

No. 105 PC.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 27.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 7 March 1972.
# C_2011365EN.01000401.xml

| 15.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 365/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 365/4

---

Notice regarding the adaptation in line with inflation of certain amounts laid down in the Reinsurance Directive

2011/C 365/05

In accordance with Article 41 of Directive 2005/68/EC (1) on reinsurance and amending Council Directives 73/239/EEC, 92/49/EEC as well as Directives 98/78/EC and 2002/83/EC, the amounts laid down in euros in Article 40(2) were reviewed in 2011 in order to take account of changes in the European index of consumer prices comprising all Member States, as published by Eurostat.

1

As a result of the review, the amounts laid down in euros are increased from EUR 3 200 000 to EUR 3 400 000 and from EUR 1 100 000 to EUR 1 200 000.

The Commission Services have informed the European Parliament and the Council of the review and the adapted amounts.

---

(1)  OJ L 323, 9.12.2005, p. 1.

1

---
☒ To modify the conditions of supervision as follows: 

“The defendant shall be required to submit to periodic polygraph testing at the discretion of the probation 

office, as a means to ensure that he or she is in compliance with the requirements of supervision or treatment 

program.”

PROB 12B

FLNP(2/2013)

Northern District of Florida

REQUEST FOR MODIFYING THE CONDITIONS OR TERM OF SUPERVISION

WITH CONSENT OF THE OFFENDER

(Probation Form 49, Waiver of Hearing is Attached)

Name of Offender: Steven Michael Babik Case Number: 1:10CR00003

Name of Sentencing Judicial Officer: Stephan P. Mickle, Chief U.S. District Judge

Date of Original Sentence: September 17, 2010

Original Offense: Receipt or Distribution or Attempted Receipt or Distribution of Child Pornography, 18 

U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2)(A), and 2252A(b)(1).

Original Sentence: 151 months imprisonment, to be followed by Life supervised release.

Type of Supervision: Supervised Release Date Supervision Scheduled to 

Commence:

7/20/2021

PETITIONING THE COURT

☐ To extend the term of supervision for years, for a total of years.

Case 1:10-cr-00003-MW-GRJ Document 54 Filed 08/03/21 Page 1 of 3
Babik, Steven 

Request for Modifying the Conditions or Term of Supervision 

Page 2 

CAUSE

The defendant was convicted of a federal sex offense and is required to register under SORNA as a sexual 

offender. Participation in sex offender counseling is an integral component of the containment approach of 

effectively supervising defendants convicted of sex offenses and in controlling the risk to the community. 

Polygraph exams are an integral part of sex offender counseling to ensure compliance with treatment. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Respectfully submitted,

by Dennis J. Thomson

U.S. Probation Officer

Date: August 3, 2021

Case 1:10-cr-00003-MW-GRJ Document 54 Filed 08/03/21 Page 2 of 3
Babik, Steven 

Request for Modifying the Conditions or Term of Supervision 

Page 3 

☐ No Action

☐ The Extension of Supervision as Noted Above

☐ The Modification of Conditions as Noted Above

☐ Other -

Signature of Judicial Officer

 Date

s/ Mark E. Walker, Chief District Judge, Northern District of Florida

August 3, 2021

Case 1:10-cr-00003-MW-GRJ Document 54 Filed 08/03/21 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 19-8 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 19-8 Filed 10/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2  I, Ted R. Sharp, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB/A of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. 4. Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's most recent fiscal quarter (Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's internal control over financial reporting; and 1. Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys auditors and the audit committee of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Little Squaw Gold Mining Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: June 30, 2006   By   /s/ Ted R. Sharp Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer     1
tme-ex466_392.htm



 

Exhibit 4.66

Spousal Consent

 

The undersigned, Yang Xingzhu, (Identification No.:[          ]), is the lawful spouse of Ji Mingzhong (Identification No.: [          ]). I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree to the execution of the following documents by Ji Mingzhong as of August 28, 2019 (the “Transaction Documents”) and the disposal of the equity interest of Niannian Youyu Culture Media Co., Ltd. (the “Domestic Company”) held by Ji Mingzhong and registered under his name pursuant to the provisions of the following documents:

 


	
 
	
(1)
	
the equity interest pledge agreement by and among Ji Mingzhong, Tencent Music (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (the “WFOE”), the Domestic Company and other parties;





	
 
	
(2)
	
the exclusive option agreement by and among Ji Mingzhong, the WFOE, the Domestic Company and other parties; 





	
 
	
(3)
	
the loan agreement by and between Ji Mingzhong and the WFOE; and





	
 
	
(4)
	
the power of attorney by Ji Mingzhong to the WFOE.




 

I hereby confirm that I do not enjoy any interests or rights in the Domestic Company and hereby undertake not to make any assertions in respect of the equity interest of the Domestic Company. I further confirm that, Ji Mingzhong can perform the Transaction Documents and further amend or terminate the Transaction Documents or execute other agreements to replace the Transaction Documents absent any authorization or consent from me.

 

I hereby undertake to execute all necessary documents, and take all necessary actions, to ensure appropriate performance of the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time).

 

I hereby agree and undertake that, if I acquire any equity interests in the Domestic Company for whatever reasons, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) and shall comply with the obligations of a shareholder of the Domestic Company thereunder. For this purpose, upon the WFOE’s request, I shall execute a series of written documents in substantially the same format and content as the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time).

 


	
Signature:
	
 
	
/s/ Yang Xingzhu

	
Date:
	
 
	
August 28, 2019
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 13, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00750

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF W.M.T.K.,

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10

- 0141

- CV

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due January 7, 2015. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of

time was filed.

We therefore order appellant, Lucas James Knight, to file, by January 23, 2015

, his

appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief.

If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we will dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 3 8.8(a).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have h ereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of January, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
***EXHIBIT 31***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Eric Montandon, certify that:  

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K (“Report”) of Asia8, Inc.;  

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:  

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  

 

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. I have disclosed based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 9, 2008  

 

/s/ Eric Montandon 

Eric Montandon, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

44

 

----
Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 8      Filed 08/08/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03512-JSR     Document 8      Filed 08/08/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03595-JSR     Document 6      Filed 05/14/2007     Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6346
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIE MACK TUCKER, JR., Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-95-339, CA-96-93-20-7) Submitted: September 5, 1996 Decided: September 17, 1996 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Mack Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Beattie B. Ashmore, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Appellant has also filed a motion for production of sentencing transcripts. As these transcripts are already part of the record, we deny his motion as moot. 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104- 132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Tucker , Nos. CR-95-339; CA-96-93-20-7 (D.S.C. Feb. 15, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. *

AFFIRMED
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2233 

To nullify the effect of the recent executive order that requires Federal 

agencies to share citizenship data. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. MURRAY, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. 

REED, Mr. BROWN, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, 

Mr. KAINE, Mr. BENNET, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Ms. HIRONO, and Ms. 

DUCKWORTH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To nullify the effect of the recent executive order that 

requires Federal agencies to share citizenship data. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RECESSION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The provisions of Executive Order 

5 13880 (84 Fed. Reg. 33821; July 11, 2019), entitled 

6 ‘‘Collecting Information About Citizenship Status in Con7 nection With the Decennial Census’’, are rescinded and 

8 shall have no force or effect. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2233 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect as 

2 if enacted on July 11, 2019. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### LEE v. TIRE CO.

No. 102 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 150.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 June 1979.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**WRITTEN STATEMENTPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

The undersigned,RONALD G. LEE, the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, of LEEPHARMACEUTICALS (the “Company”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, herebycertifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(i)  the FORM10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | MAY 17, 2004      |   |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|--------|
|   |              |
|   |              |
|   | /s/ RONALD G. LEE |
|   | Ronald G. Lee     |

 

----
#### STATE v. MOODY

No. 9 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 749.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 7 February 1978.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

LAX ELECTRONICS, INC., DBA AUTOMATIC 

CONNECTOR,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee

______________________ 

2021-2374

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in No. 1:19-cv-01668-EGB, Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JUSTIN HUFFMAN, Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, 

NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. 

 ELIZABETH ANNE SPECK, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also 

represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON, DEBORAH ANN BYNUM,

PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY. 

 ______________________ 

Case: 21-2374 Document: 32 Page: 1 Filed: 06/07/2022
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, TARANTO and 

STARK, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

June 7, 2022 

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-2374 Document: 32 Page: 2 Filed: 06/07/2022