alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                            15,735
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                      238,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  29,638
<PP&E>                                                         9,536,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 2,989,146
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 6,919,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          7,211,142
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                      10,927,063
<OTHER-SE>                                                     8,082,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   6,991,618
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       0
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 537,583
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               478,354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (1,008,436)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (1,008,436)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (1,008,436)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.09)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 3.2
 AMENDED AND RESTATED REGULATIONS
OF
LANCASTER COLONY CORPORATION
(the Corporation)
 ARTICLE I
 MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS
 SECTION 1.01 ANNUAL MEETING .
 SECTION 1.02 SPECIAL MEETING .
 SECTION 1.03 NOTICE OF MEETINGS .
 SECTION 1.04 PERSONS BECOMING ENTITLED TO SHARES BY OPERATION OF LAW OR TRANSFER .
 SECTION 1.05 QUORUM AND ADJOURNMENTS .




---



##### 



SECTION 1.06 ORGANIZATION OF MEETINGS .
  SECTION 1.07 CONDUCT OF BUSINESS .




---



##### 



th




---



##### 



SECTION 1.08 PROXIES AND VOTING AT MEETINGS .




---



##### 



SECTION 1.09 SHAREHOLDERS LIST .
   SECTION 1.10 WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS .
 ARTICLE II
 DIRECTORS
 SECTION 2.01 POWERS .
 SECTION 2.02 NUMBER .
 SECTION 2.03 NOMINATION .




---



##### 



th




---



##### 



SECTION 2.04 CLASSIFICATION, TERM OF OFFICE AND ELECTION OF DIRECTORS .




---



##### 



SECTION 2.05 INCREASE OR DECREASE IN THE NUMBER OF DIRECTORS .
  SECTION 2.06 VACANCY .
  SECTION 2.07 REMOVAL OF A DIRECTOR .




---



##### 



SECTION 2.08 QUORUM AND ADJUSTMENTS .
 SECTION 2.09 ORGANIZATION MEETING .
 SECTION 2.10 REGULAR MEETINGS .
 SECTION 2.11 SPECIAL MEETINGS .
 SECTION 2.12 PARTICIPATION IN MEETINGS BY TELEPHONE .
 SECTION 2.13 COMPENSATION .




---



##### 



ARTICLE III
 COMMITTEES
 SECTION 3.01 COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS .
  SECTION 3.02 CONDUCT OF BUSINESS .
 ARTICLE IV
 OFFICERS
 SECTION 4.01 ELECTION .




---



##### 



SECTION 4.02 TERM .
 SECTION 4.03 PRESIDENT .
 SECTION 4.04 CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD .
 SECTION 4.05 VICE PRESIDENT .
 SECTION 4.06 SECRETARY .
 SECTION 4.07 TREASURER .
 SECTION 4.08 DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY .
 SECTION 4.09 ACTION WITH RESPECT TO SECURITIES OF OTHER CORPORATIONS .




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
 INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
 SECTION 5.01 INDEMNIFICATION .
 ARTICLE VI
 CAPITAL STOCK
 SECTION 6.01 STOCK CERTIFICATES .
 SECTION 6.02 TRANSFERS .




---



##### 



SECTION 6.03 REGISTERED HOLDERS .
 SECTION 6.04 NEW CERTIFICATES .
 ARTICLE VII
 MISCELLANEOUS
 SECTION 7.01 PROVISION ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION .
 SECTION 7.02 RECORD DATES .
 SECTION 7.03 AMENDMENTS .




---



##### 



SECTION 7.04 FISCAL YEAR .
EXHIBIT 10.5



IVAX Diagnostics, Inc.



July 29, 2003



Mario Cossi

Via Stesicoro 148

00125 Roma

Italy



Re: Consulting Agreement II



Dear Mr. Cossi:



As you are aware, we are parties to a Consulting Agreement II, dated as of September 1, 1999 (the Agreement),
relating to certain consulting services provided by you to IVAX Diagnostics, Inc. (IVD). Terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.



The initial three-year term of the Agreement expired on August 31, 2002. As previously discussed, both you and IVD desire to
extend the Agreement, on the same terms and conditions stated therein, for another three-year term, commencing effective as of September 1, 2002 and ending on August 31, 2005.



This letter sets forth our mutual understanding and acknowledgement that, notwithstanding any agreements, documents or
discussions, whether written or oral, to the contrary, the Agreement, as hereby extended, continues in full force and effect as of September 1, 2002 and remains the legal, valid and binding agreement of each of you and IVD. You and IVD both hereby
ratify and confirm, as of September 1, 2002, all of our respective obligations under the Agreement, as hereby extended.



If the foregoing correctly sets forth our agreement, please sign this letter in the space indicated below and return a signed copy to my attention.



Sincerely,IVAX Diagnostics, Inc.By:

/s/ Giorgio DUrsoGiorgio DUrso,President and Chief Executive Officer




|                       
|-----------------------
|Accepted and agreed to:
|                       
|/s/ Mario Cossi        
|Mario Cossi
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6400

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. COREY DEWAYNE KERR , Defendant

- Appellant

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 1:11

- cr - 00219

- NCT

- 1; 1:15

- cv - 00005

- NCT

- JLW )

Submitted : June 21, 2018 Decided: June 26, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Corey Dewayne Kerr, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Corey Dewayne Kerr seeks to appeal the district court’s order acceptin g the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Kerr’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificat e of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasona ble jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed t he record and conclude that Kerr has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materi als before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### STATE v. LASSITER

No. 45.

Case below: 13 N.C. App. 292.

Motion to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 7 March 1972.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 9, 2007 / Presidential Documents 57481 

Proclamation 8187 of October 4, 2007 

Leif Erikson Day, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

On Leif Erikson Day, we commemorate the enduring legacy of a brave 

explorer and honor the significant contributions of Nordic Americans who 

continue to enrich our culture and our way of life. 

Leif Erikson, a son of Iceland and grandson of Norway, led a determined 

crew across the Atlantic more than 1,000 years ago and became one of 

the first Europeans known to reach North America. The courage of these 

pioneers helped open the world to new exploration and important discoveries. Today, Nordic Americans help strengthen our country, and their determination and optimism make America a more hopeful land. Our Nation 

continues to benefit from strong ties with Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, 

and Sweden, and we are grateful for their continued friendship. 

To honor Leif Erikson and to celebrate our citizens of Nordic-American 

heritage, the Congress, by joint resolution (Public Law 88–566) approved 

on September 2, 1964, has authorized the President to proclaim October 

9 of each year as ‘‘Leif Erikson Day.’’ 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 9, 2007, as Leif Erikson Day. I 

call upon all Americans to observe this day with appropriate ceremonies, 

activities, and programs to honor our rich Nordic-American heritage. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD2
57482 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 9, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–5008 

Filed 10–5–07; 8:55 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with FRD2GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
#### STATE v. SURLES

No. 27 P 82.

Case below: 55 N.C. App. 179.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 March 1982.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10631 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODRIGO PEREZ-ESPINOZA, also known as Rodrigo Espinoza, also known as Rodrigo Espinoza-Perez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:00-CR-470-ALL-D

-------------------- October 29, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rodrigo Perez-Espinoza appeals the 46-month term of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Perez-Espinoza contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence was an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment.No. 01-10631 -2- Perez-Espinoza notes that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which recited only facts and elements supporting a charge of simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), and argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense. Perez-Espinoza acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). PerezEspinoza’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. In lieu of filing an appellee’s brief, the Government has filed a motion asking this court to dismiss this appeal or, in the alternative, to summarily affirm the district court’s judgment. The Government’s motion to dismiss is DENIED. The motion for a summary affirmance is GRANTED. The Government need not file an appellee’s brief.
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO DISMISS DENIED; MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE GRANTED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

-againstCHEREESE STEVENS, 

Defendant. 1 

P. KEVIN CASTEL, U.S.D.J. 1 

Upon the application of defense counsel, consented to b the government, the Y 

conference previously scheduled for June 25,2007 is adjourned until J ly 27,2007 at " 

10:lS a.m. in Courtroom 12C. I find that the ends ofjustice will be se ed by granting a t 

continuance and that taking such action outweighs the best interest of e public and the 4 

defendant in a speedy trial. My reasons for this finding are that the gr t of the continuance is i 

needed to allow the parties to continue discussion regarding a dispositi n of this case. i 

Accordingly, the time between today and July 27,2007 is excluded. 

SO ORDERED. 

P. Kevi Caste1 

United States District Judge 

Dated: New York, New York 

June 22,2007 

Case 1:07-cr-00363-PKC Document 7 Filed 06/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET (AUDITED) AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1999, AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
(AUDITED)FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BYREFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,747                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,679                  16,889
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    192,539                  83,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               729,563                 189,703
<PP&E>                                          56,628                  27,209
<DEPRECIATION>                                  31,170                  24,375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 785,820                 197,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          241,202                 514,473
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,028,652                (18,839)
<OTHER-SE>                                   (484,034)               (298,212)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   785,820                 197,422
<SALES>                                      1,014,997                 429,914
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,014,997                 429,914
<CGS>                                          584,708                 262,744
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  430,289                 167,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               657,528                 636,136
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,214                   2,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (185,822)               (460,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                (44,171)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (185,822)               (416,771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (185,822)               (416,771)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.00)                   (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)                   (.00)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-579

In Re: JAMES VASSELL, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-95-11-2) Submitted: March 10, 1998 Decided: June 18, 1998 Before WILKINS, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and HALL, Senior Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Vassell, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: By this application for a writ of mandamus, James Vassell seeks an order of this court directing the district court to hear and decide his currently pending 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) motion. The motion has been briefed since December 18, 1995, without resolution. Because of the nature of the action pending before the district court, this court ordered a response to Vassell’s petition. A response was filed, see Fed. R. App. P. 21, and the matter is now ripe for adjudication.While the district court does not explain the delay in resolving Vassell’s petition, the court, in its response, made assurances that the motion would be acted upon before the end of May 1998. Thus, the district court contends that granting the petition for a writ of mandamus is unnecessary. We agree. Mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be granted in extraordinary situations. See In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Vassell must demonstrate that he has no other avenue for relief and that his right to relief is clear and indisputable. See Mallard v. United States Dist. Court , 490 U.S. 296, 309 (1989).In this case, Vassell fails to meet his burden, because the district court has clearly indicated that the motion will be resolved forthwith. The response of the district court demonstrates that Vassell has other avenues of relief available. Therefore, granting the petition for mandamus would be inappropriate, as the district3 court’s assurances accomplish substantially everything that this court would have directed. Accordingly, we grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny Vassell’s petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice. If Vassell encounters additional, significant delay, he may apply again for mandamus relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-19 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 24 of 24
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# Time and Date:

2 p.m., Wednesday, October 24, 2007.

# Place:

1325 G Street, NW., Suite 800, Boardroom, Washington, DC 20005.

# Status:

Open.

# Contact Person for More Information:

                        Erica Hall, Assistant Corporate Secretary, (202) 220-2376;                         *ehall@nw.org.*

# Agenda:

I. Call to Order.

II. Approval of the Minutes.

III. Summary Report of the Finance, Budget and Program Committee.

IV. Summary Report of the Audit Committee.

V. Summary Report of the Audit Committee.

VI. Summary Report of the Corporate Administration Committee.

VII. Financial Report.

VIII. Corporate Scorecard.

IX. Chief Executive Officer's Quarterly Management Report.

X. Field Operations Presentation.

Adjournment.

Erica L. Hall

Assistant Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 07-5225 Filed 10-18-07; 2:12 pm]

BILLING CODE 7570-02-M