alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 1 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 2 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 3 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 4 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 5 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 6 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 7 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 8 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 9 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 10 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 11 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 12 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 13 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 14 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 15 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 16 of 17
Case 5:10-cv-00101-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/04/10 Page 17 of 17
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KELVIN FRAZIER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:10cv81/MCR/MD

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge filed on May 24, 2010, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and after reviewing

objections to the Recommendation, if any, the Recommendation is adopted as the

opinion of the Court.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal (doc. 13) is granted, this case

is dismissed without prejudice, and the clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of June, 2010.

 s/M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 

### NUMBER 13 - 15 - 00275 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

PATRICIA ANN CACERES , Appellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No 1

of Victoria County , Texas.



## O R D E R
B efore Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Order Per Curia m
Appellant, Patricia Ann Caceres, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from
his conviction in trial court cause number 2

- 103819 . The trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defe ndant does not have the right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of2

appeal is not made a part of the record. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(d); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Within thirty days of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, W.A. 'Bill'
White , is hereby ORDERED to: 1) re view the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a right to a ppeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to app eal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of this notice, identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 44.3, 44.4; see also, e.g., Carroll v. S tate, No. 04

- 03

- 00473

- CR, 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 7317 (San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (designated for publication) (certification form provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not a ddressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case law, and any factual allegations therein must be true and supported by the record. Cf. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appella te rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting appellant’s right to appeal shall be attac hed to the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1,
10.2. PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b). Delivered and filed the 26th day of June 2015

.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 203 (Monday, October 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59539-59540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5196]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice

[[Page 59540]]

is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Initial Review Group Biobehavioral and Behavioral 
Sciences Subcommittee.
    Date: November 13-14, 2007.
    Time: 9 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Doubletree Hotel, 1515 Rhode Island NW., Washington, DC 
20005.
    Contact Person: Marita R. Hopmann, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6001 Executive Boulevard, 
Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-6911, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adc5c2ddc0ccc3c3c0edc0ccc4c183c3c4c583cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="026a6d726f636c6c6f426f636b6e2c6c6b6a2c656d74">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: October 12, 2007.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 07-5196 Filed 10-19-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SHERRIE RUSSELL-BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-00257-MP -GRJ

ROBERT H JERRY, II, LEVIN COLLEGE OF LAW, THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, THE

UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 150, Notice Filing Affidavits of Rodney W.

Smith and Richard C. Mccrea, Jr. by Robert H Jerry, II, Levin College of Law, the University of

Florida, the University of Florida Board of Trustees. In accordance with this Court’s August 19,

2010 order, Defendants have filed an application for attorney fees and costs. Plaintiff has filed a

Notice of Appeal, Doc. 146, seeking review of the order dismissing her claims by the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. 

Normally, the filing of a notice of appeal divests the district court of jurisdiction over all

matters covered in the appeal and transfers jurisdiction over those matters to the court of appeals. 

United States v. Rogers, 788 F.2d 1472 (11th Cir. 1986). However, “[i]t is well settled in this

circuit that costs may be taxed after a notice of appeal has been filed.” Rothernberg v. Security

Management Co., Inc., 677 F.2d 64, 64 (11th Cir. 1982). Our sister court in Georgia stated

“[t]he award of costs [under Rule 41(a)(2)] usually includes all litigation-related expenses

incurred by the defendant, including reasonable attorney fees.” Bishop v. West American Ins.

Co., 95 F.R.D. 494 (D.C. GA., 1982). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) allows the

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -GRJ Document 155 Filed 09/27/10 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:09-cv-00257-MP -GRJ

district court to grant voluntary dismissal under terms it considers proper, including the taxation

of attorney fees. Ortega Trujillo v. Banco Central Del Ecuador, 379 F.3d 1298, 1301 (11th Cir.

2004). Therefore, this Court determines that it is fitting and proper to assess costs and attorney

fees pursuant to order granting voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(b)(2), even if that order has

been appealed. 

Defendants’ motion for attorney fees and supporting affidavits are sufficiently specific. 

Plaintiff, however, will have an opportunity to object to the hours billed and hourly rate. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Clerk is directed to set a hearing on this motion for Wednesday, October 6,

2010 at 10:00 a.m. 

2. Plaintiff must submit objections to hours billed or hourly pay rates, if any, in

writing no later than close of business Friday October 1, 2010. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -GRJ Document 155 Filed 09/27/10 Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 52011XX0228(01) - EN

*|*

# 52011XX0228(01)

**Statement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission **

*
Official Journal L 055 , 28/02/2011 P. 019 - 019 *

Statement by the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission

Article 5(2) of this Regulation requires the Commission to adopt a draft implementing act where the committee delivers a positive opinion. This provision does not preclude that Commission may, as is the current practice, in very exceptional cases, take into consideration new circumstances that have arisen after the vote and decide not to adopt a draft implementing act, after having duly informed the committee and the legislator.

--------------------------------------------------
# C_2011221EN.01000401.xml

| 27.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/4

---

Communication pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 885/2006 concerning the composition of the Conciliation Body instituted in the context of the clearance of accounts of the EAGF and the EAFRD

2011/C 221/03

| 1. | At his request, the Commission has terminated the term of office of Mr PERRIN as chairman of the Conciliation Body with effect from 1 July 2011. |
| --- | --- |

1.

At his request, the Commission has terminated the term of office of Mr PERRIN as chairman of the Conciliation Body with effect from 1 July 2011.

| 2. | The Commission has nominated Mr BAUMANN as chairman of the Conciliation Body for the period 1 July 2011-31 July 2011 as well as for the period 1 August 2011-31 July 2014. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission has nominated Mr BAUMANN as chairman of the Conciliation Body for the period 1 July 2011-31 July 2011 as well as for the period 1 August 2011-31 July 2014.

| 3. | The Commission has nominated Mr KEVVAI as member of the Conciliation Body for the period 1 July 2011-31 July 2011 as well as for the period 1 August 2011-31 July 2014. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Commission has nominated Mr KEVVAI as member of the Conciliation Body for the period 1 July 2011-31 July 2011 as well as for the period 1 August 2011-31 July 2014.

| 4. | The Commission has renewed the term of office as member of the Conciliation Body of Mrs SANCHEZ TRUJILLANO and Mr TREVELYAN for the period 1 August 2011-31 July 2012. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Commission has renewed the term of office as member of the Conciliation Body of Mrs SANCHEZ TRUJILLANO and Mr TREVELYAN for the period 1 August 2011-31 July 2012.

---
#### John BURKE and Margaret M. Burke, Appellants, v. UPLAND TERRACE, INC., and District of Columbia, Appellees.

No. 19176.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued June 10, 1965.

Decided June 30, 1965.

Mr. Robert L. Ellis, Arlington, Va., with whom Messrs. Anthony J. Siciliano and John J. Daly, Arlington, Va., were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Laurence T. Scott, Washington, D. C., for appellee, Upland Terrace, Inc.

Mr. David P. Sutton, Asst. Corporation Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Chester H. Gray, Corporation Counsel, Milton D. Korman, Principal Asst. Corporation Counsel, and Hubert B. Pair, Asst. Corporation Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee, District of Columbia.

Before Bazelon, Chief Judge, and Fahy and Leventhal, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court on a verdict directed in favor of the defendants, appellees, at the conclusion of the case in chief of plaintiffs, appellants. Their suit was for damages attributed to injuries to the female plaintiff suffered in a fall on an icy sidewalk in front of property owned by Upland Terrace, Inc. Within the principles governing the liability of the municipality in such cases,1 and that of *363the property owner,2 we agree with the District Court that the plaintiffs’ evidence failed to make out a case warranting submission to the jury of the issues of liability.

Affirmed.

LEYENTHAL, Circuit Judge, took no part in the consideration and decision in this case.

1

. Smith v. District of Columbia, 89 U.S. App.D.C. 7, 189 F.2d 671; Lyons v. District of Columbia, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 278, 214 F.2d 203; Campbell v. District of Columbia, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 120, 243 F.2d 226; see District of Columbia v. Nordstrom, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 165, 327 F.2d 863; cf. District of Columbia v. McNeill, 120 U.S.App.D.C. -, 344 F.2d 195.

2

. Hecht Co. v. Hohensee, 65 App.D.C. 328. 83 F.2d 585, where it is said:

> In Norville v. Hub Furniture Co., 59 App.D.C. 29, 32 F.2d 420, we held that, in the absence of statutory provision to the contrary, the owner or occupant of property owes no duty to pedestrians to keep the sidewalk in front of it free from ice and snow coming thereon from natural causes * * *.
|EXHIBIT 99.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Each of the undersigned hereby
      certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of
      4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (the Company), that the Quarterly
      Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003,
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of the Company.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: May 15, 2003
|------------------



|By: | /s/ Alfred R. Kahn |                                                                              
|--- | ------------------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                    | Alfred R. Kahn
      Chairman of the Board 
      and Chief Executive Officer



|Date: May 15, 2003
|------------------

|By: | /s/ Joseph P. Garrity |                                                                                   
|--- | --------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                       | Joseph P. Garrity
      Executive Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer





|A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been  provided to 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and will be
retained by 4Kids  Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or  its staff upon request.
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | 
| |  | 



---
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS     Document 4      Filed 07/30/2007     Page 1 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS     Document 4      Filed 07/30/2007     Page 2 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS     Document 4      Filed 07/30/2007     Page 3 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS     Document 4      Filed 07/30/2007     Page 4 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS     Document 4      Filed 07/30/2007     Page 5 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS     Document 4      Filed 07/30/2007     Page 6 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS     Document 4      Filed 07/30/2007     Page 7 of 8

Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS     Document 4      Filed 07/30/2007     Page 8 of 8
No. 1430, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se. Richmond M. Flowers,*Attorney General of Alabama, and *John C. Tyson HI,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

#### Allen *v.*Alabama.

Supreme Court of Alabama. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Oilsands Quest Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended April 30, 2009, the undersigned Garth Wong, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:
  (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  July 29, 2009
   /s/Garth WongGarth Wong, Chief Financial Officer
Dismissed and Opinion Filed January 26, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 00716

- CV

DESTINY BERKLEY , Appellant

V. REGAL CROSSING APART MENTS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 20

- 01469

- C

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Molberg Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. By order d ated October 2 2 , 2020,

the Court informed appellant the reporter’s record had been filed, vacated our

October 8, 2020 order submitting the case without a reporter’s record, and ordered

appellant to file her brief by November 2 0, 2020. By postcard dated Nov ember 24,

2020, we notified appellant the time for filing h er brief had expired. We directed

appellant to file a brief and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned

appellant that failure to file a brief and an extension motion would result in th e
dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not filed a– 2

–

brief, filed an extension motion, nor otherwise corresponded with the Court

regarding the status of this appeal.

A ccordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b),

(c).

200716f.p05 /Ken Molberg// KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE– 3

– 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

DESTINY BERKLEY, Appellant

No. 05

- 20

- 00716

- CV V.

REGAL CROSSING APARTMENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 20

- 01469

- C. Opinion delivered by Justice Molberg. Justices Reichek and Nowell participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of th is date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered this 26 th day of January, 2021.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                           Consolidated Subsidiaries
                             As of March 31, 2001

Infonet N.V./S.A.                                         Belgium
Infonet Belgium S.A.                                      Belgium
Infonet Software Solutions                                Canada
Infonet Services Canada Inc.                              Canada
Infonet China Limited                                     China
ESG Communications Inc.                                   Delaware
IINS, Inc.                                                Delaware
Infonet Broadband Services Corporation                    Delaware
Infonet USA Corporation                                   Delaware
NetWorks Telephony Corporation                            Delaware
Infonet Corporation                                       Delaware
International Information Services, Inc.                  Delaware
Infonet Government Services, Inc.                         Delaware
Infonet France S.A.                                       France
Osiware International, S.A.                               France
Infonet Italia S.p.A.                                     Italy
Infonet Luxembourg S.A.                                   Luxembourg
Infonet Servicios de Communicaciones, S.A. de C.V.        Mexico
Infonet Taiwan Co., Ltd.                                  Taiwan
Infonet Telekomunikasyon Hizmetleir A.S.                  Turkey
Infonet UK, Ltd.                                          UK
IBSC Limited                                              UK
Infonet Software Solutions UK                             UK