alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TPA 511,457,539v1 7-26-10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SHERRIE RUSSELL-BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-CV-00257-MP-AK

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA

BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA,

LEVIN COLLEGE OF LAW, and

ROBERT H. JERRY, II, in his individual

and official capacities as Dean of the

University of Florida, Levin College of Law,

Defendants.

/

DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting that the Court set a scheduling conference. [Doc.

101]. Defendants do not oppose that request. Defendants believe that a scheduling conference

would be more meaningful and productive after the Court’s rulings on defendants’ dispositive

motion and plaintiff’s motion to amend. The disposition of those motions will clarify the issues and

parties in this action.

/s/ Richard C. McCrea, Jr.

Richard C. McCrea, Jr.

Florida Bar No. 351539

E-mail: mccrear@gtlaw.com

GREENBERG TRAURIG, P.A.

625 E. Twiggs Street, Suite 100

Tampa, Florida 33602

Telephone: (813) 318-5700

Facsimile: (813) 318-5900

Counsel for defendants

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 111 Filed 07/27/10 Page 1 of 2
TPA 511,457,539v1 7-26-10 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 27th, 2010 I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which will send a notice of electronic filing to the

following::

Lennox S. Hinds, Esquire

Stevens, Hinds & White, P.C.

116 W. 111th Street

New York, NY 10026

/s/ Richard C. McCrea, Jr.

Attorney

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-AK Document 111 Filed 07/27/10 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         3,774
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    78,208
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,424
<PP&E>                                         31,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          236,195
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (385,043)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,996
<SALES>                                        255,282
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               255,282
<CGS>                                          142,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,680
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             10,417
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (33,887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (33,887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (33,887)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (33,887)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of Army

# AGENCY:

Department of Army, DOD.

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC) as the Program Manager for DOD's Personal Property Non-Temporary Storage Program is withdrawing the proposed Warehouse Performance Bond Requirement Proposal for Non-Temporary Storage Transportation Service Providers. In light of the information and comments provided and considering the other major on-going initiatives such as implementation of Full Replacement Value liability, Phase III of the Families First initiative, etc. within the DOD Personal Property Program, SDDC has decided to withdraw the proposed Warehouse Performance Bond Requirement Proposal.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         October 1, 2007.                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Requests for additional information may be sent to                         *Centralrsmo@sddc.army.mil;*                         or by courier to: Department of Army, HQ, SDDC Central RSMO, ATTN: SDDC-PPP-PA-C, P.O. Box 19225, Topeka, KS 66619-0225.                    

## Regulation Flexibility Act

This action is not considered rulemaking within the meaning of Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612.

## Paperwork Reduction Act

                    The Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3051*et seq.,*                     does not apply because no information collection or recordkeeping requirements are imposed on contractors, offerors alternatively, members of the public.                

James N. Johnson,

Chief, Operations & Analysis Branch.

[FR Doc. 07-5277 Filed 10-24-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3710-08-M
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANTHONY SIKORA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:10cv165-RH/WCS

LEON COUNTY JAIL et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 6). No objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED. The clerk must enter

judgment stating, “The complaint is dismissed with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B).” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on June 21, 2010.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1
**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. § 1350,****ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO****§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**
       In connection with the annual reporton Form 10-KSB as amended by Amendment No. 1 and Amendment No. 2 on Form10-KSB/A of SulphCo, Inc. (as amended, the "Report")of SulphCo, Inc. (the"Company") for the annual period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Rudolf W.Gunnerman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Pat Lacy, Controller,Treasurer, and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, eachhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge,that: 
       (1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 
       (2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 
/s/ Rudolf W. GunnermanRudolf W. GunnermanChief ExecutiveOfficer
June 29, 2004
/s/ Pat LacyPat LacyController, Treasurer, and PrincipalFinancialand Accounting Officer
June 29, 2004
       This certification accompanies thisReport pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filedby the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended.
II 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2206 

To express the sense of Congress regarding restoration and maintenance 

of the Mardasson Memorial in Bastogne, Belgium. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2019 

Mr. TILLIS (for himself and Mr. DURBIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To express the sense of Congress regarding restoration and 

maintenance of the Mardasson Memorial in Bastogne, 

Belgium. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2206 IS

1 SECTION 1. SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING AGREEMENT 

2 BETWEEN THE AMERICAN BATTLE MONU3 MENTS COMMISSION AND THE GOVERNMENT 

4 OF BELGIUM BY WHICH THE COMMISSION 

5 WOULD ACQUIRE, RESTORE, OPERATE, AND 

6 MAINTAIN THE MARDASSON MEMORIAL IN 

7 BASTOGNE, BELGIUM. 

8 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress make the following find9 ings: 

10 (1) The Battle of the Bulge was one of the 

11 largest land battles fought by the United States dur12 ing World War II, yielded more than 75,000 Amer13 ican casualties over the winter of 1944–1945, and 

14 stopped the last major German offensive on the 

15 Western Front. 

16 (2) The Battle of the Bulge is a legendary bat17 tle in the history of the United States Army. 

18 (3) Following the war, Belgian groups raised 

19 funds to construct the Mardasson Memorial in Bas20 togne, Belgium, to honor Americans killed, wounded, 

21 and missing in action during the Battle of the 

22 Bulge. 

23 (4) The Mardasson Memorial, inaugurated in 

24 1950, is a five-pointed American star with the his25 tory of the battle, the names of the units that 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2206 IS

1 fought, and the names of the States engraved in 

2 gold letters throughout. 

3 (5) The Mardasson Memorial, owned and main4 tained by the Government of Belgium, is in need of 

5 extensive repair to restore it to a condition commen6 surate to the service and sacrifice it honors. 

7 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con8 gress to support an agreement between the American Bat9 tle Monument Commission (hereinafter referred to as 

10 ‘‘ABMC’’) and the Government of Belgium— 

11 (1) under the monument maintenance program 

12 of the ABMC, and subject to the requirements of 

13 such program, by which the ABMC would use its ex14 pertise and presence in Europe to oversee restora15 tion of the Mardasson Memorial in preparation for 

16 the 75th anniversary of the Battle of the Bulge; and 

17 (2) under the monument trust fund program of 

18 the ABMC, and subject to the requirements of such 

19 program, by which the ABMC assumes ownership 

20 and responsibility for the Mardasson Memorial, en21 suring that the Memorial stands for decades to 

22 come, honoring American service and sacrifice, and 

23 inspiring future generations. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ROBERT A LOVEDAY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00014-MP -WCS

MICHAEL J ASTRUE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 28, the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28

U.S.C. § 2412. The parties agree to the amount of fees. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees under EAJA in the amount of $2,666.60, subject to any

offsetting debt owed by the Plaintiff to the United States. If the agreement between

Plaintiff and Plaintiff's Counsel is such that these fees are assigned to Plaintiff Counsel,

any fees or partial fees received by the Plaintiff are to be considered held in trust for, and

payable to, Plaintiff's Counsel.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of April, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:10-cv-00014-MP-WCS Document 31 Filed 04/22/11 Page 1 of 1
ACCEPTED

12-14-00295-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

8/3/2015 4:54:04 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 8/3/2015 4:54:04 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
#### GADDY v. GADDY

No. 89 PC.

Case below: 14 N.C. App. 226.

Petition for writ of certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 13 June 1972.
atel_Ex4_1


		
			Exhibit 4.1
		

		
			 
		

		
			DESCRIPTION OF COMPANY MEMBERSHIP INTEREST (“UNITS”)
		

		
			Fast Act Exhibit 4(vi) “Description of registrant’s securities”
		

		
			 
		

		
			Summary
		

		
			 
		

		
			The following description summarizes certain important terms of ATEL 15, LLC’s (the “Company”) membership interests (the “Units”). This description summarizes the provisions that are included in the Company’s Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement (the “Operating Agreement”).  This summary will not provide all the information relevant to the Units. For a complete description of the Units,  please refer to the applicable provisions of Company’s Operating Agreement and relevant California governing law.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Outstanding Units
		

		
			 
		

		
			6,542,557 Units have been subscribed by the members of the Company as of December 31, 2019.
		

		
			 
		

		
			General
		

		
			 
		

		
			Liquidity. The Units were offered and sold pursuant to registration under the Securities Act of 1933, and subsequently registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  However, the Units are subject to significant restriction on transferability in order to preserve the tax characterization of the Company and tax consequences for Unit holders.  Accordingly, the Units are not traded on any securities exchange and have limited liquidity.  Please review the rights of Unit holders for transfer of shares under the Operating Agreement.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Voting Rights. The holders of Units are entitled to one vote per share on any matter to be voted upon by holders of Units in the Company’s Operating Agreement. Certain rights may only be exercised upon receiving at least a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by Unit holders
		

		
			 
		

		
			Distributions.  The holders of Units are entitled to distributions on a pro rata basis, if, as, and when distributed by the Manager.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Other Rights. No holder of Units has any priority or preemptive right as to the Units.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dissolution and Winding Up.  Upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the Unit holders are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining after payment of creditors.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Transfer Agent and Registrar. The transfer agent and registrar of the Units is Conduent Inc.
#### STATE v. PINYAN

No. 77 PC.

Case below: 35 N.C. App. 577.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 4 April 1978. Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question allowed 4 April 1978.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1
[LITTON LOGO]

                          CERTIFICATION OF RESOLUTION

                          OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

                            LITTON INDUSTRIES, INC.


I, the undersigned, ANA G. RODRIGUEZ, Assistant Secretary of LITTON INDUSTRIES,
INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the following is a true and correct extract of
certain resolutions duly adopted by the Board of Directors of said corporation
on September 24, 1998, in accordance with the laws of Delaware and the By-laws
of this corporation, and that said resolutions are in full force and effect as
of the date hereof:

     RESOLVED, that the Litton Industries, Inc. Restoration Plan (the
     "Restoration Plan") be amended to provide that in the event of a change of
     control of the Corporation the retirement benefits provided thereunder
     become fully vested, that all participants become immediately eligible for
     the commencement of payment of such retirement benefits, that such
     retirement benefits be protected under a newly adopted Litton Industries,
     Inc. Restoration Plan Trust (the "Restoration Plan Trust") and that the
     Compensation and Selection Committee of this Board of Directors be given
     the authority to decide whether any such retirement benefits should be paid
     in the form of a lump sum calculated to be present value equivalent of the
     benefits otherwise payable and that the actuarial assumptions used to
     determine such lump sum yield an amount sufficient for each participant to
     purchase an adequate replacement annuity;

     RESOLVED, that the Restoration Plan Trust be adopted to provide for the
     payment of Restoration Plan retirement benefits in the event of a change of
     control of the Corporation and that the Compensation and Selection
     Committee of this Board of Directors be given the authority to decide
     whether any such retirement benefits should be paid in the form of a lump
     sum; and

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that Carol A. Wiesner or Timothy G. Paulson be
     individually authorized to approve and adopt such Restoration Plan Trust
     and to approve the appropriate lump sum actuarial assumptions on behalf of
     the
<PAGE>   2
     Corporation and to take such other actions as may, in the judgment of
     either such person, be necessary and appropriate to effectuate the purpose
     and intent of the foregoing resolutions.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of
said corporation at Woodland Hills, California, this 8th day of December, 1998.


[SEAL]
                                                 /s/ ANA G. RODRIGUEZ
                                                 --------------------
                                                 Ana G. Rodriguez
                                                 Assistant Secretary
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Asia4sale.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eric Montandon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
- Text95: 
    - Text96: 
    - Text97: 
    - Text98: 
    - Text99: 
    - Text100: 
    - Text101: 
    - Text102: 
    - Text103: 
    - Text104: 
    - Text105: 
    - Text106: 
    - Text107: 
    - Text108: 
    - Text109: 
    - Text110: 
    - Text111: 
    - Text112: 
    - Text113: 
    - Text115: 
    - Text116: 
    - Text117:
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-7 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 19-7 Filed 04/01/2008 Page 2 of 2
Document

Exhibit 10.31


FIRST ADDENDUM TO STANDARD INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL SINGLE-TENANT LEASE – NET DATED AUGUST 15, 2014 BY AND BETWEEN GEIGER COURT, LLC, AS LESSOR AND EXAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC. AS LESSEE, FOR THE PREMISES LOCATED AT 1221 LIBERTY WAY, VISTA, CALIFORNIA.


Lessor and Lessee mutually agree to amend the lease as follows:


Paragraph 1.3 (Term):
The Lease Term will be extended to the new Expiration Date of January 31, 2021


Paragraph 50 (Rent Schedule):
Base Rent shall be as follows:


						
	Dates	Base Rent
	February 1, 2018 - January 31, 2019	$19,308.96 per month
	February 1, 2019 - January 31, 2020	$19,888.23 per month
	February 1, 2020 - January 31, 2021	$20,484.88 per month




Paragraph 58 (Existing Furniture):


Replace “Lessee may use furniture for $0.01/SF per month during the Lease Term” with “Lessee may use furniture for no charge during the Lease Term”.


Building Improvements:


Landlord will replace outdated thermostats in building with new advanced thermostats. Landlord will replace manual rocker light switches in offices, conference rooms, copy room and break room with motion sensing automatic on and off switches. Tenant will coordinate the installation of these improvements remit direct costs to Landlord for reimbursement.
1.Landlord to pay initial $2,500. Tenant to pay next $2,500. Cost to be split 50/50 over $5,000.
2.Landlord cost capped at no higher than $5,000.
3.All work to be completed prior to end of 2017.




Lessee will be responsible for any other work or modifications to HVAC systems as determined by Lessee. Upon execution of this Addendum, Lessee shall be responsible for contracting direct with an HVAC vendor for maintenance and repairs and have full control over the HVAC systems.




All other terms and conditions of the existing Lease shall remain in full force and effect.
















									
	LESSOR:	

	LESSEE:
	Geiger Court, LLC	

	Exagen Diagnostics, Inc.
	

	

	


	

	

	


	By: /s/ Hal Tilbury	

	By: /s/ Ron Rocca
	

	

	


	By:	

	Title: CEO
	

	

	


	Date: 8/2/2017	

	Date: 8/2/2017