alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Edmond G. Scruggs, plaintiff in error, *vs.*William Gibson and Cicero Gibson, administrators, defendants in error.

When a set-off had been pleaded to the plaintiffs’ action, it was error to allow the plaintiffs, on their own motion, to dismiss their own action, on the ground of their own default in not having paid all legal taxes on their own debt, as required by the Act of 1870.

Set-off. Tax affidavit. Relief Act of 1870. Dismissal of suit. Before Judge Twiggs. Glasscock Superior Court. September Term, 1871.

William Gibson and Cicero Gibson, as administrators upon the estate of Sterling Gibson, deceased, brought complaint *510against Edmond G. Scruggs, upon a promissory note, dated January 1st, 1862, and due one day after the date thereof. The defendant pleaded as set-off a counter-claim against plaintiffs exceeding the demand sued on, and asked judgment for the surplus. The case being called for trial, the plaintiffs moved to dismiss the action because the affidavit of the payment of taxes had not been filed, as required by the Act of 1870. The defendant objected upon the ground that the plea of set-off filed exceeded in amount the demand of plaintiffs, and that he waived all ad vantage that might be 'taken on account of failure to file the tax affidavit. The Court allowed the action to be dismissed, and defendant excepted.

E. H. Pottle, by brief, for plaintiffs in error.

C. S. Dubose; Carswell *&*Denny, for defendants.

Warner, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs in the Court below brought an action on a promissory note -against the defendant, who filed a plea of set-off. On the trial of the case the plaintiffs made a motion to dismiss their own suit on the ground of their own default in not having filed an affidavit that all legal taxes had been paid on their own debt, as required by the Act of 1870. The defendant resisted the motion, on the ground that he had pleaded a set-off for a larger amount than the plaintiffs’ demand, and expressly waived any and all right to demand that an affidavit of payment of taxes should be made or filed, as required by the Act of 1870. The Court dismissed the plaintiffs’ action, and the defendant excepted.

In our judgment it was error for the Court to dismiss the plaintiffs’ action, on their own motion, against the' consent of the defendant, on the statement of facts disclosed in the record : Code, section 2856. Whatever else may be said of the Act of 1870, it cannot reasonably be claimed that it was intended to allow parties to take advantage of their own wrong.

Let the judgment of the Court below be reversed.
# C_2011348EN.01000801.xml

| 29.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/8

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 18 June 2010 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.092 (2) — Bathroom fittings and fixtures

Rapporteur: France

2011/C 348/07

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that a fine should be imposed on those addressees of the draft decision, for which an imposition of a fine is proposed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that a fine should be imposed on those addressees of the draft decision, for which an imposition of a fine is proposed.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the basic amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the basic amounts of the fines.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that there are no mitigating nor aggravating circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that there are no mitigating nor aggravating circumstances.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the amounts of reduction of the fines based on the 2002 Leniency Notice. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the amounts of reduction of the fines based on the 2002 Leniency Notice.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on inabilities to pay. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on inabilities to pay.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
Order entered February 4, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01613-CV

MIKOB PROPERTIES, INC., ALLAN KLEIN, AND MITCHELL KOBERNICK,

Appellants

V.

DAVID JOACHIM AND INTERNATIONAL REALTY CONCEPTS, INC., Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-01602

ORDER

The Court has before it appellee David Joachim’s letter, received by the Court on this 

date, requesting a continuance of oral argument. We will treat the letter as a motion to postpone 

oral argument and DENY the motion. The appeal will be submitted on this date as scheduled, 

and an opinion will issue in due course.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 207 (Friday, October 26, 2007)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 61033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-5369]



[[Page 61031]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2008-2 of October 11, 2007--Waiver and 
Certification of Statutory Provisions Regarding the Palestine 
Liberation Organization Office



Presidential Determination No. 2008-3 of October 16, 2007--Provision of 
U.S. Drug Interdiction Assistance to the Government of Brazil



Presidential Determination No. 2008-4 of October 18, 2007--Presidential 
Determination With Respect to Foreign Governments' Efforts Regarding 
Trafficking in Human Persons



Presidential Determination No. 2008-5 of October 19, 2007--Presidential 
Determination Relating to Assistance for Saudi Arabia


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 207 / Friday, October 26, 2007 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 61033]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2008-2 of October 11, 
                2007

                
Waiver and Certification of Statutory Provisions 
                Regarding the Palestine Liberation Organization Office

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                Pursuant to the authority and conditions contained in 
                section 534(d) of the Foreign Operations, Export 
                Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 
                2006, Public Law 109-102, as carried forward by the 
                Revised Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2007, 
                Public Law 110-5, and the Continuing Appropriations 
                Resolution, 2008, Public Law 110-92, I hereby determine 
                and certify that it is important to the national 
                security interests of the United States to waive the 
                provisions of section 1003 of the Anti-Terrorism Act of 
                1987, Public Law 100-204.

                This waiver shall be effective for a period of 6 
                months. You are hereby authorized and directed to 
                transmit this determination to the Congress and to 
                publish it in the Federal Register. 
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, October 11, 2007.

[FR Doc. 07-5369
Filed 10-25-07; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. EDW IN HER

N ANDEZ-TREJO, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-50157

D.C . No. 3:14-c r-01032-B TM M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Southe rn Distric t of C a lifornia B arry Te d M oskowitz , C h ie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 14, 2016 ** B e fore : B EA, WATFORD, a nd FR IEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Edwin He rnan de z -Tre

jo a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s his jury -tria l c onvic t ion a nd 66-m onth se nte nc e for im porta tion of m e tha m phe tam ine , in viola

tion of 21 U.S.C . §§ 952 a nd 960. Pursua

nt to Ande rs v . C alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Hernan de z -Tre jo’ s c o unse l ha s file d a

brie f 

# FIL ED JUN 20 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).sta

ting tha t the re are n o grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra wa s c ounse l of re c ord. W e hav e provide d He rnande z -Tre

jo the opportunity

to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Our inde pe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua n t to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l. W e grant He rnan de z -Tre

jo’ s m otion to file

c o rre c te d e xc e rpts of re c ord. The C le rk sha ll file the e xc e rpts of re c ord subm itte d on April 29, 2016. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 5 0 1 5 7 2
#### SASSER v. BECK

No. 179 PC.

Case below: 40 N.C. App. 668.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.
Case 1:07-cv-03578-PKC     Document 8      Filed 06/27/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 1:07-cv-03578-PKC     Document 8      Filed 06/27/2007     Page 2 of 2
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 1 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 2 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 3 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 4 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 5 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 6 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 7 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 8 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 9 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 10 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 11 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 12 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 13 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 14 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 15 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 16 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 17 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 18 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 19 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 20 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 21 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 22 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 23 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 24 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 25 of 26
Case 5:10-cv-00106-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 05/06/10 Page 26 of 26
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of William Lyon Homes (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William Lyon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/    WILLIAM LYON

---

William Lyon

Chief Executive Officer

March 14, 2007



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to William Lyon Homes and will be retained by William Lyon Homes and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION v. RALEIGH FARMERS MARKET, INC., RALEIGH SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, and L. N. WEST and Wife, BETSEY JOHN H. WEST.

(Filed 24 March, 1965.)

1. Appeal and Error § 53—

A petition to rehear may be granted in order to clarify a decision of the court which the parties concerned misconstrue.

2. Appeal and Error § 59; Eminent Domain § 7a—

Decision of the Supreme Court that whether the act of the Highway Commission amounted to a “taking” of a property right by eminent domain presented on the record a question of law and fact for the court, does not purport to impair either party’s right to jury trial on the other issues.

On rehearing.

*Attorney General Bruton, Assistant Attorney General Lewis, Trial Attorney Rosser; Young, Moore & Henderson by Associate Counsel J. Allen Adams for the State.*

*Manning, Fulton •& Skinner and Jack P. Gulley for defendant appellant.*

Rodman, J.

The opinion in this cause, filed January 29, 1965, is reported 263 N.C. 622, 139 S.E. 2d 904.

In apt time, plaintiff and Farmers filed a petition to rehear. Rehearing was requested because, in the opening paragraph of the opinion, it is said: “In substance, the action of the parties amounted to a waiver *140of a jury trial * * The petition was allowed “for clarification of opinion with respect to right of trial by jury.”

An order which does nothing more than settle the issues is interlocutory. An appeal from such an order is premature. *DeBruhl v. Highway Com.,*241 N.C. 616, 86 S.E. 2d 200. The sentence containing the quoted language was inserted merely to show that the appeal should be considered as within the spirit, if not the letter, of G.S. 1-277. It was not intended to limit, nor has either party’s right to jury trial been impaired by what was said.

The conclusion heretofore reached is

Reaffirmed.
# C_2011295EN.01001001.xml

| 7.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/10

---

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2010

2011/C 295/06

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.eda.europa.eu/

---
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 5 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 5 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03496-WHP Document 5 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 3 of 3
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 212 / Friday, November 2, 2007 / Presidential Documents 62401 

Proclamation 8198 of October 31, 2007 

National Hospice Month, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

One of America’s greatest values is compassion, and our country is blessed 

by all those who dedicate themselves to caring for others. During National 

Hospice Month, we recognize the dedicated professionals and volunteers 

who provide love and comfort to those who are terminally ill. 

Across our Nation, hospice physicians, nurses, counselors, and volunteers 

provide invaluable support that enables many of our citizens to spend their 

final days in comfort and dignity. By providing physical, psychological, 

and social assistance, hospice care workers help ensure their patients can 

spend valuable time with loved ones. Hospice caregivers also help by providing guidance and counseling to the families of those who are ill. 

Our Nation is committed to helping ensure that citizens with terminal illness 

and their families receive the assistance they need. We believe in the dignity 

and worth of every person at every stage of life, and hospice care brings 

support and comfort to those in need. 

Hospice care professionals and volunteers are answering a timeless call 

to love their neighbors as themselves. During National Hospice Month, we 

recognize these individuals for their strength and compassion. Their efforts 

make our country a more loving and caring place. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution 

and laws of the United States, do hereby proclaim November 2007 as National 

Hospice Month. I encourage all Americans to observe this month with appropriate programs and activities. I also ask Americans to recognize our health 

care professionals and volunteers for their contributions to helping provide 

comfort and care to those facing terminal illness. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS3
62402 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 212 / Friday, November 2, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this thirty-first day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–5511 

Filed 11–1–07; 9:38 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS3GWBOLD.EPS</GPH>
```

[Congressional Bills 116th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2129 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

116th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2129

 To require the Secretary of Transportation to develop best practices 
 for incorporating resilience into emergency relief projects, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 2019

  Ms. Baldwin (for herself, Mr. Braun, and Mr. Cardin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Transportation to develop best practices 
 for incorporating resilience into emergency relief projects, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EMERGENCY RELIEF PROGRAM.

    (a) Definitions.--In this Act:
            (1) Emergency relief project.--The term ``emergency relief 
        project'' means a project carried out under the emergency 
        relief program under section 125 of title 23, United States 
        Code.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Transportation.
    (b) Improving the Emergency Relief Program.--Not later than 90 days 
after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall--
            (1) revise the emergency relief manual of the Federal 
        Highway Administration--
                    (A) to include and reflect a definition of the term 
                ``resilience'';
                    (B) to identify procedures that States may use to 
                incorporate resilience into emergency relief projects; 
                and
                    (C) to encourage the use of Complete Streets design 
                principles and consideration of access for moderate- 
                and low-income families impacted by a declared 
                disaster;
            (2) develop best practices for improving the use of 
        resilience in--
                    (A) the emergency relief program under section 125 
                of title 23, United States Code; and
                    (B) emergency relief efforts;
            (3) provide to division offices of the Federal Highway 
        Administration and State departments of transportation 
        information on the best practices developed under paragraph 
        (2); and
            (4) develop and implement a process to track--
                    (A) the consideration of resilience as part of the 
                emergency relief program under section 125 of title 23, 
                United States Code; and
                    (B) the costs of emergency relief projects.
                                 <all>
```
#### STATE v. LEDNUM

No. 150 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 387.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 July 1981.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Secretary

In order to comply with the mandate of section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

On the bais of the best information currently available to the Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Republic of.

Iraq is not included in this list, but its status with respect to future lists remains under review by the Department of the Treasury. 

Dated: October 22, 2007.

John L. Harrington, 

International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).

[FR Doc. 07-5302 Filed 10-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-25-M