alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.3

                    MODIFICATION OF SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE


WHEREAS this agreement is in reference to a loan which is evidenced by an
instrument entitled Secured Promissory Note, (NOTE), dated October 29, 1999
executed by LEE PHARMACEUTICALS for the original principal sum of Four
Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($400,000.00) and payable to the order
of FINOVA CAPITAL CORPORATION.

Principal balance outstanding on this Note as of this date is THREE HUNDRED
NINETY NINE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND 00/100 DOLLARS ($399,400.00).

NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed by the undersigned parties that the Note shall be
amended in the following respect:


Maturity date of the Note shall be extended to May 21, 2002.


Except as noted above, all the terms, conditions and provisions of said Note
shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

Date:   May 19, 2000                     Loan Number: LEE09
     ----------------                                -------

FINOVA CAPITAL CORPORATION               LEE PHARMACEUTICALS
a Delaware corporation                   a California corporation
--------------------------               ------------------------


BY:      FARHAD MOTIA                    BY:    RONALD G. LEE
    ----------------------------             ------------------------
    Farhad Motia, Vice President             Ronald G. Lee, President
#### RUSSELL v. SAM SOLOMAN CO.

No. 104 PC

Case below: 49 NC App 126

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 January 1981.
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 131 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 131 Filed 08/16/10 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 131 Filed 08/16/10 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 131 Filed 08/16/10 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 131 Filed 08/16/10 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 131 Filed 08/16/10 Page 6 of 6
- Text47: 
    - Text48: 
    - Text49: 
    - Text50: 
    - Text51: 
    - Text52: 
    - Text53: 
    - Text54: 
    - Text55: 
    - Text56:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2011321EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/5 |

---

Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

2011/C 321/05

| | |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Greece |
| Route concerned | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Astipalea | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Ikaria | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Leros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Milos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Samos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Chios | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Limnos–Mitilini–Chios–Samos–Rhodes | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Rhodes–Karpathos–Kasos–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Alexandroupoli–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Aktio–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Kithira | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Naxos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Paros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Karpathos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Sitia | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Skiathos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Corfu | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Rhodes–Kos–Leros–Astipalea | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Corfu–Aktio–Kefalonia–Zakinthos–Kithira | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Kalimnos | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Kalamata | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Athens–Skiros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Thessaloniki–Skiros | | | | | --- | --- | | — | Rhodes–Kastelorizo | |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | From 1 April 2012 |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge | | | | --- | | Hellenic Civil Aviation Authority | | Directorate-General for Air Transport | | Directorate for Air Operations | | Department Β | | Vassileos Georgiou 1 | | 166 04 Elliniko | | GREECE | | Tel. +30 2108916149 / 2108916121 | | Fax +30 2108947132 | | Internet: http://www.hcaa.gr | |

---
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31,
2007 of Abazias, Inc.. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  Date:
      August 4, 2008/s/
      Jesus DiazJesus
      Diaz, Chief Financial Officer
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Abazias, Inc.. and will be
retained by Abazias, Inc.. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BOBBY MELLARD

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 26

[ May 30, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Edward H. Merrigan,

Jr. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 08

- 12247 CF10B

.

Bobby Mellard, Crawfordville, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, T AYLOR and C IKLIN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**Exhibit
      31.1**





**RULE
      13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)** **CERTIFICATIONS**





I,
      Jie
      Su, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of GFR Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
      “Company”).





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
      the periods presented in this report;





4.  The
      Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15d-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:





(a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the Company, including its consolidates subsidiaries,
      is
      made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that has
      materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
      internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The
      Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s
      auditors and the audit committee of Company’s board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and





(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial
      reporting.





Date:
      April 12, 2007




By:  */s/
      Jie Su*


Jie
      Su
#### HAYES CRARY, SR. v. HOYT W. CIVILS and wife, LULA B. CIVILS.

(Filed 26 February 1964.)

Betterments § 1—

During the term of the lease the lessee may not recover for betterments, notwithstanding his contention that the betterments were placed upon the property in reliance upon the landlord’s verbal agreement to include in the lease a provision for renewal for an additional ten-year term.

Appeal by plaintiff from *Bundy, J.,*October, 1963 Session, CeaveN Superior Court.

Plaintiff instituted this civil action to recover $35,000.00 actual, and $10,000.00 punitive damages “for betterments and improvements placed upon and added to the property solely because of a verbal contract and agreement . . . which the said Hoyt W. Civils has wrongfully and fraudulently failed to carry out on behalf of himself and his wife.”

The plaintiff further alleges an agreement by defendants to lease to the plaintiff a described store building in New Bern for 10 years, beginning September, 1959, at $165.00 monthly rental with an option to renew for another ten years at a rental to be determined by business conditions at the beginning of the renewal period. The defendants executed a written lease for 10 years but the option to renew was inadvertently omitted. The plaintiff has requested the defendants to execute a written agreement for the additional term, but this they refuse to do. The plaintiff has made improvements of the value of $35,000.00 to the leased premises.

The defendants filed a demurrer upon the ground the complaint fails to state a cause of action. From the judgment sustaining the demurrer, the plaintiff appealed.

*Charles L. Abemethy, Jr., for plaintiff appellant.*

*Ward and Tucker for defendant appellees.*

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff is in possession under a lease which does not expire for more than five years. He is using the fixtures and improvements for his own benefit. He fails to allege either that the improvements were necessary or that the defendants authorized them or agreed to pay for their installation. Whether his additions to the building are such business fixtures as will permit him to remove them when his lease expires, does not appear. If the defendants are in anywise liable, which is not conceded, the extent of the liability cannot be determined until the time the plaintiff surrenders the leased premises.

The complaint fails to state a cause of action. The demurrer was properly sustained.

Affirmed.
{A0801044.DOC }

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

FIRST CITIZENS BANK AND

TRUST COMPANY, INC., successor

by assignment to GEORGIAN BANK,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5: 10-cv-33 RS EMT 

JOHN WILLIS HOMES OF FLORIDA, INC.,

A Florida Corporation, ROLLING DUNES 

DEVELOPMENT, LLC, JOHN P. WILLIS,

MAGNOLIA BAY CLUB MASTER 

ASSOCIATION INC., 

SANTA ROSA GOLF VILLAS

OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and

MAGNOLIA BAY CLUB NEIGHBORHOOD

ASSOCIATION, INC.

Defendants.

FINAL JUDGMENT OF DEFICIENCY

Before me is the Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Deficiency Judgment (Doc. 45)

It is ORDERED:

1. Final Judgment of Foreclosure (the "Final Judgment") was entered in this case on 

May 18, 2010, and, as of that date, Plaintiff was owed $11,607,572.21.

2. The date of the foreclosure sale in this matter was July 13, 2010 and there were 57 

days between the date the Final Judgment was entered and the date of the sale.

3. The $11,607,572.21 judgment amount, at the statutory rate of 0.38% interest, 

generates a rate per diem of $120.85, and over 57 days results in an additional $6,888.45 in 
{A0801044.DOC }

interest for a total amount owed to Plaintiff as of the date of the foreclosure sale of 

$11,614,460.66.

4. The Court finds the fair market value of the subject properties on the date of the 

foreclosure sale was $2,871,000.00.

5. The difference between the amount owed to Plaintiff, including post-judgment 

interest, as of the date of the foreclosure sale and the fair market value of the property as of that 

same date is a principal deficiency of $8,797,460.66. As such, as of the date of entry of the 

deficiency judgment, Plaintiff is due $8,797,460.66, which shall accrue interest at the rate of 

0.38% from July 13, 2010.

6. Plaintiff, First Citizens Bank and Trust Company, Inc., 1230 Main Street, 

Columbia, South Carolina 29201, shall have a final money judgment of deficiency against 

Defendants, JOHN WILLIS HOMES OF FLORIDA, INC., ROLLING DUNES 

DEVELOPMENT, LLC and JOHN P. WILLIS, for damages in the amount of $8,797,460.66,

which shall accrue interest at the rate of 0.38% per annum from July 13, 2010 until satisfied. 

FOR ALL OF WHICH LET EXECUTION ISSUE.

7. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to close the file.

ORDERED on February 7, 2011.

/s/ Richard Smoak________________________

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JANUARY 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          77,471
<SECURITIES>                                    19,340
<RECEIVABLES>                                  867,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    629,793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,032,190
<PP&E>                                       1,551,739
<DEPRECIATION>                               (944,928)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,148,527
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,788,856
<BONDS>                                        775,410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,053
<COMMON>                                        45,429
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,211,412
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,148,527
<SALES>                                      2,338,460
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,338,460
<CGS>                                        1,829,583
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,829,583
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                79,934
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                152,008
<INCOME-TAX>                                    60,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             91,205
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    91,205
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.95
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lancaster Colony Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
John B. Gerlach, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John L. Boylan,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do each hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial conditions and results of
            operations of the Company.

                                       By: /s/ JOHN B. GERLACH, JR.
                                           ---------------------------
                                               John B. Gerlach, Jr.
                                               Chief Executive Officer

                                       May 10, 2005

                                       By: /s/ JOHN L. BOYLAN
                                           ---------------------------
                                               John L. Boylan
                                               Chief Financial Officer

                                       May 10, 2005

                                       23
#### TREXLER v. TREXLER

No. 51 PC

Case below: 48 NC App 743

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 2 December 1980.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

THE MERCHANTS BANK,

Respondent

v.

EXECUTRIX CHERYL A. FUREY AND THE 

ESTATE OF ANNE M. FUREY, 

DECEASED,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 29 MM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of May, 2021, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
# C_2011111EN.01001201.xml

| 9.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/12

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 16 July 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/38.866 (2) — Animal Feed Phosphates

Rapporteur: Greece

2011/C 111/07

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the basic amounts of the fines for each addressee of the draft decisions. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the basic amounts of the fines for each addressee of the draft decisions.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that there are neither aggravating nor mitigating circumstances applicable in this case for any addressee of the draft decisions. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that there are neither aggravating nor mitigating circumstances applicable in this case for any addressee of the draft decisions.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission as regards the amounts of reductions of the fines based on the 2002 Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission as regards the amounts of reductions of the fines based on the 2002 Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the application of the pertinent reduction, under the Settlement Notice, of the amount of the fine of the settling parties. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the application of the pertinent reduction, under the Settlement Notice, of the amount of the fine of the settling parties.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on inability to pay. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on inability to pay.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 8. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

8.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union.

---
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lescarden Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William E. Luther, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





|                                            | 
|------------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ William E. Luther                       | 
|William E. Luther                           | 
|Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer | 
|January 14, 2009                            |
#### PROPERTIES, INC. v. KO-KO MART, INC.

No. 96 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 532.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 April 1976.