alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011222EN.01000401.xml

| 28.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/4

---

Summary information communicated by Member States on State aid granted in conformity with Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of fisheries products

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 222/05

Aid No: XF 35/10

Member State: Ireland

Region/Authority granting the aid: An Bord Iascaigh Mhara

Title of aid scheme/Name of company receiving an ad hoc aid: Seafood Category Management Scheme

Legal basis: Sea Fisheries Act 1952 (No 7 of 1952)

Annual expenditure planned under the scheme or amount of ad hoc aid granted: EUR 400 000

Maximum aid intensity: Up to maximum of 40 % of eligible private sector projects and up to 100 % of public projects carried out in the collective interest by public bodies and/or research institutions

Date of entry into force: Operative date 1 November 2010

Duration of the scheme or individual aid award (not later than 30 June 2014); indicate:

| — | under the scheme: aid will be granted until 30 June 2014 |
| --- | --- |

—

under the scheme: aid will be granted until 30 June 2014

| — | in the case of an ad hoc aid: the expected date of the last installment to be paid: not applicable |
| --- | --- |

—

in the case of an ad hoc aid: the expected date of the last installment to be paid: not applicable

Objective of aid: The objective of the scheme is to support common interest projects which aid the sustainable development of key seafood categories; pelagic, whitefish, shellfish and salmon.

This scheme is being paid under Articles 17, 20, 21 and 23 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 736/2008 of 22 July 2008.

Indicate which of Articles 8 to 24 is used: Articles 17, 20, 21 and 23

Activity concerned: Seafood production and processing sectors

Name and address of the granting authority:

| An Bord Iascaigh Mhara |
| --- |
| PO Box 12 |
| Crofton Road |
| Dún Laoghaire |
| Co. Dublin |
| IRELAND |

An Bord Iascaigh Mhara

PO Box 12

Crofton Road

Dún Laoghaire

Co. Dublin

IRELAND

Web address where the full text of the scheme or the criteria and conditions under which ad hoc aid is granted outside of an aid scheme can be found: http://www.bim.ie/templates/text_content.asp?node_id=1085

Motivation: indicate why a State aid scheme has been established instead of assistance under the European Fisheries Fund: The funding allocated to Ireland from the European Fisheries Fund was prioritised for other measures, in particular, Decommissioning of the fishing fleet, Environmentally friendly systems for fisheries, Inshore management of fisheries and Axis 4 (Development of coastal communities).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Thrift Supervision

Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the authority contained in section 5(d)(2) of the Home Owner's Loan Act, the Office of Thrift Supervision has duly appointed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as sole Receiver for the NetBank, Alpharetta, Georgia (OTS No. 8475), on September 28, 2007.

Dated: October 2, 2007.

By the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Sandra E. Evans,

Legal Information Assistant.

[FR Doc. 07-4957 Filed 10-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6720-01-M
**EXHIBIT 99.1**ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATEBARCLAYS BANK PLCGRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 8) PLC     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Barclays Bank PLC (the “Bank”), asServicer, pursuant to the Beneficiaries Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 23, 1999 (the“Agreement”), among the Bank, as Servicer and Barclaycard Funding PLC, as Investor Beneficiary,does hereby certify that:     1. The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings asset forth in the Agreement.     2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.     3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2006 was conducted under my supervision.     4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreementthroughout such calendar year and no material default in the performance ofsuch obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in theParagraph 5 below.     5. The following is a description of each material default in the performanceof the Servicer’s obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known tothe undersigned to have been made by the Servicer during the calendar yearended December 31, 2005, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each suchdefault, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each suchdefault and (iii) the current status of each such default:     None.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Annual Servicer’s Certificate this27th day of June, 2006.      Barclays Bank PLC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000059593
<NAME> LINDBERG CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                               215,993
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                     19,111,927
<ALLOWANCES>                         658,000
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  23,520,896
<PP&E>                           135,794,061
<DEPRECIATION>                    64,683,701
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   132,231,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             11,835,127
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                              66,734
<OTHER-SE>                        31,326,834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     132,231,964
<SALES>                           30,223,454
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  30,223,454
<CGS>                             21,928,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     21,928,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   4,924,399
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   667,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    2,821,097
<INCOME-TAX>                       1,128,364
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                1,692,733
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                       1,692,733
<EPS-BASIC>                           0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.30


</TABLE>
#### STATE v. HUGHES

No. 22.

Case below: 29 N.C. App. 183.

Motion of Attorney General to dismiss appeal for failure to comply with rules allowed 3 May 1976.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Fish and Wildlife Service

          - 50 CFR Part 32

###  CFR Correction

                    In Title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 18 to 199, revised as of October 1, 2006, in §32.31, on page 247, under the heading “Minidoka National Wildlife Refuge,” paragraph                     *D*                     is revised to read as follows:                

§ 32.31

* * * * *
      ( print page 54603)    

## Minidoka National Wildlife Refuge

* * * * *

*D. Sport Fishing.*                             We allow fishing on the refuge in accordance with State regulations and subject to the following conditions:                        

1. We allow bank fishing year-round. We only allow vehicle access (see § 27.31 of this chapter) to shoreline fishing areas on designated routes.

2. We allow ice fishing in accordance with State regulations. We prohibit motor vehicles (see § 27.31 of this chapter) on the ice.

3. We restrict boat fishing to designated areas as specified below:

i. On Lake Walcott, we allow boats from April 1 through September 30 within the area marked by buoys and posted signs.

ii. On Gifford Springs, we allow boats within the area marked by posted signs during the open sport fishing season.

iii. On Smith Springs, we allow boats within the area marked by posted signs during the open sport fishing season.

4. We allow use of float tubes at all times and locations except south of the southern buoy line on Lake Walcott.

[FR Doc. 07-55512 Filed 9-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 FEBRUARY 3, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 11-12500

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:10-cr-20863-AJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PATRICK RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(February 3, 2012)

Before CARNES, WILSON and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Neal Gary Rosensweig, counsel for Patrick Rivera in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18
L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rivera’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
|EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                                         OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as chief executive officer and chief financial officer, respectively,
of 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. (the Company), that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 9, 2007
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By: /s/
Alfred R. Kahn     
Alfred R. Kahn      Chairman of the Board and      Chief Executive
Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: November 9, 2007
|----------------------

| | By: /s/
Bruce R. Foster     
Bruce R. Foster      Executive Vice President and      Chief Financial
Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and will
be retained by 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2011156EN.01000101.xml

| 26.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 156/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 156/1

---

Draft amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2011 — Council position

2011/C 156/01

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic and Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (1), as last amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1081/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 (2), and in particular Article 37 thereof,

1

2

Whereas:

| — | the European Union's general budget for the financial year 2011 was definitively adopted on 15 December 2010 (3), |
| --- | --- |

—

the European Union's general budget for the financial year 2011 was definitively adopted on 15 December 2010 (3),

3

| — | on 25 March 2011, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 2 to the general budget for the financial year 2011, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 25 March 2011, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 2 to the general budget for the financial year 2011,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2011 was adopted on 23 May 2011.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 23 May 2011.

For the Council

The President

MARTONYI J.

---

(1)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1, with corrigenda in OJ L 25, 30.1.2003, p. 43 and OJ L 99, 14.4.2007, p. 18.

1

(2)  OJ L 311, 26.11.2010, p. 9.

2

(3)  OJ L 68, 15.3.2011.

3

---
#### STATE v. WILSON

No. 402P82.

Case below: 57 N.C. App. 444.

Petition by Attorney General for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 25 August 1982.
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 5 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 5 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 5 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 5 Filed 06/01/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 139 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP -AK Document 139 Filed 08/17/10 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03551-RWS     Document 5      Filed 09/12/2007     Page 1 of 1
#### STANLEY v. BROWN

No. 146 PC.

Case below: 43 N.C. App. 503.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 6 February 1980.
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Monster
Offers, a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2008 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Nate Kaup
------------------
    Nate Kaup
    President/CFO


Date  November 13, 2008
      -----------------


<PAGE>
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

KATRINA HOUSER,

Plaintiff,

v. Civil Action No. 1 4

- 132 (JEB)

SSI

,

Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff Katrina Houser filed a one

- sentence pro se Complaint in D.C. Superior Court on

October 29, 2013, which states in full: “Did not get money for Nov

- Dec 2012 none pay from

SSI

- IDA

- Lawsuit [ sic ].” ECF No. 1 (Notice of Removal), Attach. 2 (Complaint). After the

Social Security Administration removed the case to this Court, it filed a Motion to Dismiss. See

ECF N o. 6 . On March 13, 2014, the Court issued a n Order directing Plaint iff to respond to the

Motion by April 3 or risk the Court’ s deeming the matter c onceded. See ECF No. 7 . As Plaintiff

has not done so, th e Court will treat the Motion as conceded and dismiss the case without

prejudice

. See LCvR 7(b). A contemporaneous Order will so state

.

/s/ **James E. Boasberg**

JAMES E. BOASBERG

United States District Judge

Date: April 9, 2014
KPMG LLPChartered Accountants
Telephone
(403) 691-80002700 205 – 5th Avenue SW
Telefax
(403) 691-8008Calgary AB  T2P 4B9
Internet
www.kpmg.ca




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  The Board of Directors
 Oilsand Quest Inc.
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (no. 333-168461) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (nos. 333-145079 and 333-135366) of Oilsands Quest Inc. of our reports dated July 5, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Oilsands Quest Inc. (a development stage company) as of April 30, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended April 30, 2011 and for the period from inception on April 3, 1998 to April 30, 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of April 30, 2011, which reports appear in Amendment No. 1 to the April 30, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of Oilsands Quest Inc.
  Our report dated July 5, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph that states that theCompany does not presently have adequate cash and cash equivalents to fund activities for the foreseeable future and will require additional funding to maintain operations, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
   /s/ KPMG LLP
  Calgary, Canada
 July 8, 2011
    KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership and a member firm of the KPMG
 network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative
 (“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
 KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 5, 2020

b0129 

# Order

Clerk February 5, 2020

159678

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159678

COA: 342325

Washtenaw CC: 14

- 000322

- FH

ROGAN EDWARD LAMPE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2019

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“W hen denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 1

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

NUMBER 13-08-00479-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

IN RE GILBERTO RODRIGUEZ

____________________________________________________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

1

On August 11, 2008, relator, Gilberto Rodriguez, pro se, filed a petition for writ of

mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to give relator credit on his sentence for the

time that relator served from the time of his arrest and confinement until he was sentenced.

The trial court has the authority to correct the omission of presentence jail credit through

judgment nunc pro tunc. See Ex parte Ybarra, 149 S.W.3d 147, 148 (Tex. Crim. App.

2004). Mandamus is available to compel the trial court to respond to a nunc pro tunc

motion for presentence jail credit. Id. at 149. In this case, however, the petition generally
2

fails to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3. Further, the relator has not

shown that he is entitled to the relief sought or that his motion for a nunc pro tunc judgment

awaited disposition for an unreasonable length of time under the circumstances. See Ex

parte Bates, 65 S.W.3d 133, 134-35 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding).

Moreover, relator failed to demonstrate that the act sought to be compelled is purely

ministerial and the relator has a clear and indisputable right to relief. See State ex rel. Hill

v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this 14th day of August, 2008.