alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### SKINNER v. SKINNER

No. 80 PC.

Case below: 28 N.C. App. 412.

Petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 3 May 1976.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Form 10-Q
of The Lamson & Sessions Co. (the "Company") for the period ended October 2,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") on October
28, 2004 (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies that,
to such officer's knowledge:

     (1)      The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
              expressed in the Report.

     A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its
staff upon request. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever.


Date:  October 28, 2004



                                     /s/ James J. Abel
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     James J. Abel
                                     Executive Vice President, Secretary,
                                     Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
                                     (Principal Financial Officer)
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 27, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 04-60753

ELIZABETH GOMEZ,

Petitioner,

VERSUS

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, 

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

(A96-103-766)

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Elizabeth Gomez, a native and citizen of Gambia, petitions

this Court for review of an order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals (“BIA”), dismissing her appeal and affirming an immigration

judge’s (“IJ”) denial of Gomez’s application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against

Torture (“CAT”). 
2

The IJ concluded that although Gomez had been subjected to

beatings and harassment by her uncle, the incidents she relayed

were sporadic in nature over a period of years and resulted from

family relationship, not from her conversion from Islam to the

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Accordingly, the IJ

determined that Gomez failed to demonstrate that she had suffered

past persecution based on her race, religion, or social group and

failed to establish a well-founded fear of future persecution. In

dismissing Gomez’s appeal and affirming the IJ, the BIA concluded

that Gomez failed to show past persecution in Gambia and failed to

demonstrate a well-founded fear of persecution based on a protected

ground under the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1158,

if she were to return to Gambia. The BIA also determined Gomez

failed to establish grounds for withholding of removal or relief

under the CAT. 

We review the BIA’s legal conclusions de novo and findings of

fact for substantial evidence. Lopez-Gomez v. Ashcroft, 263 F.3d

442, 444 (5th Cir. 2001). “The substantial evidence standard

requires only that the BIA’s decision be supported by record

evidence and be substantially reasonable.” Omagah v. Ashcroft, 288

F.3d 254, 258 (5th Cir. 2002). Under this standard, this Court

will reverse the BIA’s decision only if evidence compels the

contrary conclusion. See Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir.

1994). 
3

After a thorough review of the briefs, the parties’ oral

arguments, and the record on appeal, we cannot conclude that the

evidence compels a conclusion contrary to that of the BIA.

Accordingly, we deny Gomez’s petition for review essentially for

the reasons provided by the BIA. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, *v.*Harry Fisher, Respondent.

(Submitted June 3, 1918;

decided June 11, 1918.)

Motion to amend remittitur denied. (See 223 N. Y. 459.)
BETANCOURT, VAN HEMMEN, GRECO & KENYON LLC

Attorneys for Defendant WEEKS MARINE, INC.

46 Trinity Place

New York, NY 10006

(212) 297-0050

Ronald Betancourt (RB-5838)

Todd P. Kenyon (TK-7654)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER DISASTER

SITE LITIGATION

GEORGE PARAMITHIS and JILL PARAMITHIS,

Plaintiffs,

v.

A RUSSO WRECKING, ET. AL.,

SEE ATTACHED RIDER,

Defendants.

x

:

x

:

:

:

:

:

x

21 MC 100 (AKH)

Case No.: 06-cv-14948 (AKH)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of this Court and all parties of record:

The undersigned hereby appear as counsels in this case for defendant Weeks Marine, Inc. The

undersigned certify that they are admitted to practice in this Court.

Dated: February 23, 2008

New York, New York

BETANCOURT, VAN HEMMEN, GRECO & KENYON LLC

Attorneys for Defendant

WEEKS MARINE, INC.

By: /S/ Ronald Betancourt

 /S/ Todd Kenyon 

Ronald Betancourt (RB5838)

Todd Kenyon (TK7654)

46 Trinity Place

Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 9 Filed 02/24/2008 Page 1 of 3
2

New York, New York 10006

(212) 297-0050

Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 9 Filed 02/24/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-14948-AKH Document 9 Filed 02/24/2008 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PENSACOLA MOTOR SALES,

a Florida corporation, d/b/a

BOB TYLER TOYOTA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:09cv571/RS-MD

EASTERN SHORE TOYOTA, LLC,

an Alabama Limited Liability Company;

DAPHNE AUTOMOTIVE, LLC, an

Alabama Limited Liability Company;

SHAWN ESFAHANI, Individually;

and DAPHNE ENTERPRISES, INC.,

an Alabama Corporation,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

AMENDED ORDER

Before me is Plaintiff’s Motion for New Trial (Doc. 180). Plaintiff asserts 

three grounds for a new trial under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59:

1. The jury verdict was inconsistent with the evidence.

2. The jury instructions were improper.

3. The verdict form was improper.
Jury Verdict

The review of a district court’s grant of a new trial is “extremely stringent” 

when the district court discards a verdict on the grounds that it is against the great 

weight of the evidence. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. v. Southeast Floating Docks, 

Inc., 571 F.3d 1143, 1145 (11th Cir. 2009). This rigorous standard of review is 

intended to ensure that a district court does not simply substitute its own credibility 

choices and inferences for the reasonable choices and inferences made by the jury. 

Id. 

In the instant case, a verdict for Defendants was not against the great weight 

of the evidence. Based on the evidence presented at trial, it was reasonable for a 

jury to conclude that Plaintiff failed to meet its burden, and to return a verdict for 

Defendants. The jury spent hours deliberating into the late evening and returned 

the following day for additional deliberation. The verdict form was properly 

completed and based on the jury’s answers, it appears they carefully considered all 

of the evidence and evaluated each “microsite” individually, making a different 

determination for each site. I find no basis to decide that the jury’s verdict was 

against the great weight of the evidence.

Jury Instructions

Plaintiff’s arguments regarding the jury instructions have already been ruled 

on as without merit. The jury instructions precisely tracked the language of the 
statute, 15 U.S.C. § 1125. The statute clearly provides that bad faith intent “shall 

not be found in any case in which the court determines that the person believed and 

had reasonable grounds to believe that the use of the domain name was fair use or 

otherwise lawful.” 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(1)(B)(ii). Plaintiff’s objection is therefore 

with the language of the statute itself, not the jury instructions.

Verdict Form

Similarly, Plaintiff’s argument that the verdict form was improper is also 

without merit. The verdict form also tracked the language of the statute precisely.

Conclusion

Plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 180) is denied. 

ORDERED on November 19, 2010.

/s/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Thomas F. Cooke, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Saratoga Resources, Inc. on Form 10-K/A No. 1 for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K/A No. 1 fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Saratoga Resources, Inc.





| |        |                        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | By:    | /s/ Thomas F. Cooke    
| | Name:  | Thomas F. Cooke        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| | Dated: | May 20, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE>      5
<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                                 AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                   JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                                             3470457
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         2557
<ALLOWANCES>                                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                   3510841
<PP&E>                                                               50427
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       36062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     3525206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                15114
<BONDS>                                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                           1879898
<OTHER-SE>                                                          689945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       3525206
<SALES>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     22844
<CGS>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       173500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    3752
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                    2310585
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        940249
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                1370336
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                       1370336
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       171.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       171.89


</TABLE>
# C_2011241EN.01001101.xml

| 19.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/11

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2011/C 241/07

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

Page 101

Page 101

2403 10 10 and 2403 10 90   Smoking tobacco, whether or not containing tobacco substitutes in any proportion

2403 10 10 and 2403 10 90

Smoking tobacco, whether or not containing tobacco substitutes in any proportion

The third paragraph is replaced by the following text:

‘Mixtures of smoking tobacco with substances other than tobacco are also classified in these subheadings provided that they correspond to the definition given above, the exception being products intended for medicinal use (Chapter 30).

These subheadings also include water pipe tobacco, i.e. tobacco intended for smoking in a water pipe and which consists of a mixture of tobacco and glycerol, whether or not containing aromatic oils and extracts, molasses or sugar, and whether or not flavoured with fruit. However, products that do not contain tobacco are excluded from these subheadings.’

Page 102

Page 102

2403 99 90   other

2403 99 90

other

The following point 5 is added:

| ‘5. | Product for smoking (for example “water pipe tobacco”) consisting wholly of tobacco substitutes and substances other than tobacco.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘5.

Product for smoking (for example “water pipe tobacco”) consisting wholly of tobacco substitutes and substances other than tobacco.’

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
# C_2011085EN.01000901.xml

| 18.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/9

---

Commission information notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 85/06

| Member State | France |
| --- | --- |
| Routes concerned | Clermont-Ferrand–Lille
  Clermont-Ferrand–Marseille
  Clermont-Ferrand–Strasbourg
  Clermont-Ferrand–Toulouse |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | Repeal |
| Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained | Order of 2 February 2011 repealing the Orders of 26 November 2009 imposing public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services from Clermont-Ferrand to Lille, Marseilles, Strasbourg and Toulouse and vice versa
  NOR: DEVA1103124A
  http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
  For further information please contact:





  Direction Générale de l'Aviation Civile |
| DTA/SDT/T2 |
| 50 rue Henry Farman |
| 75720 Paris Cedex 15 |
| FRANCE |
| Tel. +33 158094321 |
| E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr |

Member State

France

Routes concerned

Clermont-Ferrand–Lille

Clermont-Ferrand–Marseille

Clermont-Ferrand–Strasbourg

Clermont-Ferrand–Toulouse

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

Repeal

Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained

Order of 2 February 2011 repealing the Orders of 26 November 2009 imposing public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services from Clermont-Ferrand to Lille, Marseilles, Strasbourg and Toulouse and vice versa

NOR: DEVA1103124A

http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do

For further information please contact:

Direction Générale de l'Aviation Civile

DTA/SDT/T2

50 rue Henry Farman

75720 Paris Cedex 15

FRANCE

Tel. +33 158094321

E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr

---
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 15 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 15 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                        25156000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 44919000<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                   51988000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             153475000
<PP&E>                                        36872000
<DEPRECIATION>                                15570000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               229418000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         52547000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       9822000
<OTHER-SE>                                   130469000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 229418000
<SALES>                                       65193000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              65193000
<CGS>                                         46973000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 63094000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (386000)<F2>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2882000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1009000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1873000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1873000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<FN>
<F1>Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.
<F2>Interest and Other Net are reported on one line item on the Statements of
Condensed Consolidated Income.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S  10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000058526
<NAME>                        First Medical Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 520
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          533
<ALLOWANCES>                                            80
<INVENTORY>                                            103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     1,616
<PP&E>                                               1,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                         911
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       5,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,620
<BONDS>                                                390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                10
<OTHER-SE>                                             625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         5,255
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,697
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        4,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        64
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     (20)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        298
<INCOME-TAX>                                           139
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    159
<DISCONTINUED>                                         450
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           609
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .06



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 187 (Thursday, September 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54968-54969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-4762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management 
Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Government/Industry Air Traffic Management Advisory 
Committee.

DATES: The meeting will be held October 18, 2007, from 9 a.m. to 12 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at FAA Headquarters, 800 
Independence Avenue, SW., Bessie Coleman Conference Center (2nd Floor), 
Washington, DC 20591.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036;

[[Page 54969]]

telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (P.L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice is 
hereby given for the Air Traffic Management Advisory Committee meeting. 
Note: Non-Government attendees to the meeting must go through security 
and be escorted to and from the conference room. Attendees with laptops 
will be required to register them at the security desk upon arrival and 
departure. Agenda items will be posted on www.rtca.org Web site.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FUTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on September 21, 2007.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 07-4762 Filed 9-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M