alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2011090EN.01000301.xml

| 22.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/3

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP, and in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011, concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt apply

2011/C 90/03

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies who appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP (1) and in the Annex to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 (2) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Egypt.

1

2

The Council of the European Union has decided that the persons, entities and bodies that appear in the above mentioned Annexes should be included in the list of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP and in Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011.

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated on the websites in Annex II to Council Regulation (EU) No 270/2011, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 4 of the Regulation).

The persons, entities and bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above mentioned lists should be reconsidered, to the following address:

| Council of the European Union |
| --- |
| General Secretariat |
| TEFS Coordination |
| Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175 |
| 1048 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

Council of the European Union

General Secretariat

TEFS Coordination

Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175

1048 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

The attention of the persons, entities and bodies concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63.

1

(2)  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 4.

2

---
mrin-ex1020_499.htm



 

 

CONFIDENTIAL

Exhibit 10.20

AMENDMENT #1 TO

REVENUE SHARE AGREEMENT

This Amendment #1 (this “Amendment #1”) is entered into by and between Google LLC (“Google”) and Marin Software Incorporated (“Marin”), and amends that certain Revenue Share Agreement, by and between Google and Marin, effective as of October 1, 2018 (the “Agreement”). This Amendment #1 is effective from the date last signed in the signature block below (the “Amendment #1 Effective Date”). 

In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.Definitions.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment #1 will have the meanings given to such terms in the Agreement.

2.Termination by Google. Subsection 10.3.10 of the Agreement is hereby amended to delete such subsection in its entirety and replace it with the following: “Intentionally Omitted.” 

3. General.  Except as modified by the provisions of this Amendment #1, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement (including Subsections 10.3.1 to 10.3.9) will remain in full force and effect.  No agreement hereafter made will change, modify, or discharge this Amendment #1, in whole or in part, unless such agreement is in writing and signed by or on behalf of all parties hereto.  This Amendment #1 may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original and all of which will constitute one and the same instrument.  If the Agreement and this Amendment #1 conflict, this Amendment #1 governs to the extent of the conflict.  The Agreement’s governing law and dispute resolution provisions will also apply to this Amendment #1.

 

[Signature page follows]




Google Confidentialpage 1 of 2



 

 

CONFIDENTIAL

 

Signed by the parties’ duly authorized representatives on the dates below.

 


		
	
MARIN SOFTWARE INCORPORATED

 
	
GOOGLE LLC

 

	
By:              /Mike Coleman/                                              
	
By:              /Philipp Schindler/                                            

	
Name:   Mike Coleman                                              
	
Name:        Philipp Schindler                                       

	
Title:        General Counsel                                                     
	
Title:          Authorized Signatory                                               

	
Date:             March 16, 2020                                               
	
Date:     March 17, 2020                                                




 

Google Confidentialpage 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 8, 2020

izm

Order 

Clerk

June 8, 2020

161349 (36)

DAVID CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 161349

CoA: 350849

CORIZON HEALTH INC., Ingham CC: 19-000446-NZ

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, Appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the May 

26, 2020 order is denied because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. 

Within 21 days of the date of this order, Appellant shall pay the initial partial filing fee of 

$6.00 and submit a copy of the May 26, 2020 order as ordered. Failure to comply with this 

order shall result in the dismissal of this application.
#### STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ROBERT LOUIS ROSEBORO

No. 20

(Filed 15 March 1972)

Criminal Law § 135— imposition of life sentence pursuant to Supreme Court order

Judgment of life imprisonment imposed on defendant by the superior court pursuant to and in accordance with an order of the N. C. Supreme Court is affirmed.

Justice Lake dissenting.

Appeal by defendant from *Jackson,*/., October 18, 1971 Session of Cleveland Superior Court.

*Attorney General Morgan and Assistant Attorney General Mitchell for the State.*

*Chambers, Stein, Ferguson & Lanning, by James E. Ferguson, II, J. LeVonne Chambers and Charles L. Becton for defendant appellant.*

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

In *State v. Roseboro,*279 N.C. 391, 183 S.E. 2d 108, filed September 7, 1971, for the reasons there stated by Justice Branch, this Court remanded the cause to the Superior Court *717of Cleveland County for the pronouncement of judgment imposing a sentence of life imprisonment. On October 18, 1971, in open court, after due notice and in the presence of defendant and his counsel, Judge Jackson pronounced judgment that defendant be imprisoned for life in the State’s prison. Defendant excepted and gave notice of appeal. The questions he attempts to raise by his assignments of error on the present appeal heretofore have been decided adversely to defendant in this cause.

Judge Jackson’s judgment, having been entered in strict compliance with our order of September 7, 1971, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Justice Lake

dissenting.

Following the reversal of our judgment in *State v. Roseboro,*276 N.C. 185, 171 S.E. 2d 886, by the Supreme Court of the United States, “insofar as it imposes the death sentence,” the majority of this Court directed the Superior Court of Cleveland County to bring the defendant again before it and pronounce judgment that the defendant be imprisoned for life in the State’s prison. *State v. Roseboro,*279 N.C. 391, 183 S.E. 2d 108. The superior court has done so. If this be error, as I believe it to be, the responsibility is not that of the superior court. However, neither the direction of this Court nor the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States can authorize any court of North Carolina to enter judgment imposing a sentence not supported by the verdict of the jury. Having dissented from the above mentioned direction by this Court to the superior court for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion, filed that day in *State v. Hill,*279 N.C. 371, 378, 183 S.E. 2d 97, it is my view that the present sentence to imprisonment for life was erroneously imposed and the defendant should be given a new trial.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine Special Emphasis Panel, Developmental Center for Research on Complementary and Alternative Medicine.                    

*Date:*                         November 12-14, 2007.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Courtyard Marriott at Washingtonian Center, 204 Boardwalk Place, Gaithersburg, MD 20878.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Martina Schmidt, PhD., Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Complementary & Alternative Medicine, NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-3456,                         *schmidma@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

Dated: October 22, 2007.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 07-5310 Filed 10-25-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
February 27, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

WILMA REYNOLDS, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00323-CV V.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WELLS FARGO BANK NA, ET AL, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order 

signed by the court below on June 6, 2013. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Wilma Reynolds.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 22, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00622

- CV

IN RE Marissa PETERSON

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

After consideration, we GRANT real part y in interest’s u nopposed third m otion for

e xtension of t ime to f

ile a r esponse to the petition for writ of mandamus. 2 Real party in interest’s

response is due on or before December 2 9 , 2022

. Additional requests for extension of time may

be disfavored absent extenuating circumstances.

It is so ORDERED on December 22, 2022

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO :

______________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017

- CI

- 19610 , styled Marissa Peterson v. HEB Grocery Co., LP.

, pending in the 131st Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa presiding.

2 Real party in interest’s motion is titled “ Unopposed Motion for Additional 7

- Day Extension of Time to File

Response to Mandamus Petition Due to Covid

- 19.”
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 1:10-CR-03-SPM

STEVEN MICHAEL BABIK,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER RECOMMENDING PLACEMENT IN

MINIMUM-SECURITY FACILITY

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the “Defendant’s Motion for Judicial

Sentencing Recommendation and Incorporated Memorandum of Law” (doc. 40) filed

September 20, 2010, requesting that this Court make a recommendation to the Bureau

of Prisons (BOP) for Mr. Babik’s designation to a minimum-security facility.

Under BOP regulations, child pornography offenses are included in the “sex

offender” Public Safety Factor (PSF), which prohibits a designation to a minimumsecurity facility. See BOP Program Statement P5100.08, ch. 2 at 4, 8.

However, if the Court recommends a particular institution or program, that

recommendation, called a “management variable”, enables BOP to waive the PSF and

assign Mr. Babik to a minimum-security institution. See BOP Program Statement

P5100.08, ch. 5 at 3-4. See also 18 U.S.C. § 3621(b)(4)(B) (directing that BOP

consider statements by the sentencing court “recommending a type of penal or

correctional facility as appropriate”). 

Having reviewed the court file, and having heard the sentencing presentation
made by both parties on September 17, 2010, the Court finds that the PSF of “sex

offender” is unnecessary. Mr. Babik has no previous criminal history. His offense

consisted solely of viewing images of child pornography, and did not consist of selling

or purchasing images, posting images to websites, subscribing to websites, entering

chatrooms, or establishing contact with or touching any children. Placement in a

minimum-security institution would better suit Mr. Babik’s needs and his abilities to

contribute. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The “Defendant’s Motion for Judicial Sentencing Recommendation and

Incorporated Memorandum of Law” (doc. 40) is hereby granted.

2. The Court specifically recommends that Mr. Babik be placed in a minimumsecurity facility for the reasons set forth above.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-third day of September, 2010.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
#### STATE v. BLACKMON

No. 164 PC.

Case below: 44 N.C. App. 190.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 January 1980.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF PANAMA

CITY BEACH, INC.,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:10cv10/RS-CJK

BECO, INC., 

Defendant.

____________________________________/

ORDER

Before me are Plaintiff’s Bill Of Costs (Doc. 104), Plaintiff’s Motion For Attorney’s 

Fees And Related Non-Taxable Costs (Doc. 105), and Plaintiff’s Affidavit Of Related 

Non-Taxable Costs (Doc. 106).

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The clerk is directed to process Plaintiff’s Bill of Costs (Doc. 104).

2. Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $76,426.50 and nontaxable costs in the amount of $19,131.19. The clerk is directed to enter

judgment for Plaintiff against Defendant in these amounts.

ORDERED on June 2, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:10-cv-00010-RS-CJK Document 113 Filed 06/02/11 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Goldrich Mining Company, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Goldrich Mining Company.







/s/ Ted R. Sharp                          DATE:  August 14, 2008

Ted R. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Goldrich Mining Company and will be retained by Goldrich Mining Company to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SAFER HEALTHIER 

Technology

 PEOPLE News

No. 503 Milestones in Mining Safety and Health Technology March 2003 

ENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES . U

TRAPED

M

SA

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
 

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
 

HAZCOM HELPER 

COMPLIANCE TOOL FOR MSHA RULE 30 CFR PART 47 

Objective 

Develop tools that mine personnel can use to comply with 30 CFR, 

Part 47. 

Background 

The new MSHA rule, 30 CFR, Part 47 (also known as the HazCom 

rule), requires all mines to develop a written program to track hazardous 

chemicals at their sites. More specifically, the rule requires that mines 

list all chemicals and determine which are hazardous; develop a written 

Hazard Communication Program; label all containers used to store 

hazardous chemicals; obtain or develop Material Safety Data Sheets 

(MSDS) for all chemicals stored or produced; provide miners with 

training in working around hazardous chemicals; and make information 

about hazardous chemicals available to all workers. All mines with 

six or more employees must have complied with the new rule by 

September 23, 2002, and mines with five or fewer employees will have 

to be in compliance by March 21, 2003. 

Approach 

NIOSH personnel met with representatives from several mining 

companies and MSHA to discuss what NIOSH could do to help companies comply with the new rule. A significant problem identified 

was the nonavailability of software to enable writing the required 

HazCom plan and list all hazardous chemicals at a mine. 

HazCom Helper 

This software leads the person responsible for writing the HazCom 

plan step-by-step through its preparation. Prompts and suggestions 

are provided to help the writer fill in the proper information; the Help 

menu is also useful. Appendix A assists with writing a list of all 

Introductory menu to HazCom Helper 

Sample menu for HazCom Helper 
hazardous chemicals at a site. The program can be saved and recalled 

at any time so it can be updated whenever necessary. The program 

can be downloaded from www.cdc.gov/niosh/mining HAZCOM/ 

default.htm. A CD version of the HazCom program can be obtained 

from the address below. 

For More Information 

Doug Scott, NIOSH-Spokane Research Laboratory, E. 315 

Montgomery Ave, Spokane, WA 99207 (509) 354-8056 or e-mail 

dus3@cdc.gov. 

To receive additional information about occupational safety 

and health problems, call 1-800-35-NIOSH (1-800-356-4674), 

or visit the NIOSH Web site at www.cdc.gov/niosh 

Mention of any company name or product does not constitute 

endorsement by the National Institute for Occupational Safety 

and Health.
Presidential Documents

58749 

Federal Register 

Vol. 72, No. 199 

Tuesday, October 16, 2007 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 8190 of October 12, 2007 

National School Lunch Week, 2007 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

The National School Lunch Program provides millions of lunches to our 

Nation’s children each school day. During National School Lunch Week, 

we renew our commitment to the health of our children and to ensuring 

that they receive nutritious meals and develop good eating habits. 

Since it began in 1946, the National School Lunch Program has provided 

nutritious meals in schools across the country. The United States Department 

of Agriculture (USDA) has worked to ensure that these meals include fresh 

fruits, vegetables, and milk and that they meet dietary recommendations 

so children limit fat, sodium, cholesterol, and excess calories in their diet. 

By learning to eat well, children can avoid problems that can lead to serious 

long-term health problems, including heart disease, asthma, and diabetes. 

Team Nutrition, part of the USDA Food and Nutrition Service, is playing 

an important role in promoting good nutrition to children in thousands 

of our Nation’s schools, providing training and resources to food service 

professionals across our country. 

National School Lunch Week is an opportunity to recognize food service 

professionals, school officials, and parents for their dedicated efforts to 

provide healthy foods to America’s children. This week, we recommit ourselves to encouraging children to make nutritious food choices and lead 

healthy lifestyles. 

In recognition of the contributions of the National School Lunch Program 

to the health, education, and well-being of America’s children, the Congress, 

by joint resolution of October 9, 1962 (Public Law 87–780), as amended, 

has designated the week beginning on the second Sunday in October of 

each year as ‘‘National School Lunch Week’’ and has requested the President 

to issue a proclamation in observance of this week. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim the week of October 14 through October 

20, 2007, as National School Lunch Week. I call upon all Americans to 

join the dedicated individuals who administer the National School Lunch 

Program in appropriate activities that support the health and well-being 

of our Nation’s children. 


ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with MISCELLANEOUS
58750 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 16, 2007 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twelfth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand seven, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-second. 

[FR Doc. 07–5139 

Filed 10–15–07; 8:53 am] 

Billing code 3195–01–P 


ebenthall on PROD1PC69 with MISCELLANEOUSGWBOLD.EPS</GPH>