alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       UT
<CIK> 0000861388
<NAME> LG&E ENERGY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                    PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                         3,168,046
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         480,133
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                              674,555
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            128,626
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4,451,360
<COMMON>                                            776,357 <F1>
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                               128 <F2>
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                 711,534
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                    1,488,019
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                         135,328
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                              1,210,666
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                  319,061
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                            0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        20,021
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                 0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                               0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                    1,278,265
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                     4,451,360
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                         1,273,123
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                                 89,169
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                          965,487 <F3>
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                        1,054,656
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                             218,467
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   (4,660)<F4>
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                      213,807 <F4>
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             73,167
<NET-INCOME>                                        140,640
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           5,125
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                       135,515
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            107,935
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            56,475
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                              276,741
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          1.05
<FN>
<F1>Includes common stock expense of $1,874.
<F2>Represents unrealized loss on marketable securities,
    net of taxes.
<F3>Includes equity in earnings of affiliates of
    $16,230.
<F4>Includes loss from discontinued operations
    of $15,668, net of income taxes.
<F5>The Company restated this schedule to reflect
    its merger with KU Energy Corporation and to
    reclassify discontinued operations.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

OBANY COELLON ROCA,

ALIEN # A079-423-120,

Petitioner,

vs. Case No. 4:10cv44-MP/WCS

IMMIGRATION AND

CUSTOM ENFORCEMENT (ICE),

Respondent.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, initiated this petition for a writ of habeas corpus

under § 2241 on March 17, 2010, seeking the removal of a detained placed against him. 

Doc. 6.1 Respondents filed an answer to the amended petition on May 24, 2010. Doc.

12. I entered an order reminding Petitioner to file his reply, if desired, doc. 13, and

when that deadline passed without a reply, I entered an order finding the issues in this

case to be troubling, coming within the exception of the "in custody" holding as

1

 The amended petition alleges that Petitioner cannot be removed to his native

country of Cuba because no immigration agreements exists between Cuba and the

United States. Doc. 6, p. 3. Petitioner alleged ICE placed a detainer against him which

harms him because he is prevented from participating in early release programs or

obtaining work release. 
Page 2 of 3

explained in Galaviz-Medina v. Wooten, 27 F.3d 487, 493 (10th Cir. 1994) (because

prisoner had a detainer plus a final order of deportation against him, he was in INS

"custody" for habeas purposes); Zolicoffer v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, 315 F.3d 538, 540

(5th Cir. 2003) (finding that "[f]or a court to have habeas jurisdiction under § 2241, the

prisoner must be 'in custody' at the time he files his petition for the conviction or

sentence he wishes to challenge" and specifically noting that the petitioner did "not

contend that the INS actually ha[d] ordered his deportation . . . ."). Doc. 15. Thus,

Respondents were requested to file a supplemental response, or a motion to dismiss,

which more fully addresses this issue, as the Answer only asserted this case should be

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Doc. 15. 

Respondents have now filed a motion to dismiss this case as moot,

demonstrating that the detainer placed against Petitioner has been removed. Doc. 17. 

Respondents have, thus, granted Petitioner that which he sought and this petition

should, therefore, be dismissed as moot. There is no longer a controversy between

these parties. 

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that Respondents'

motion to dismiss, doc. 17, be GRANTED, and the petition for writ of habeas corpus

under § 2241 filed Obany Coellon Roca, be DISMISSED as moot.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on August 27, 2010.

 s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No. 4:10cv44-MP/WCS
Page 3 of 3

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 14 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days

after being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the

scope of review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case No. 4:10cv44-MP/WCS
EXHIBIT 32.2







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Becky Corigliano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(a)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and will be retained by Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:   November 12, 2004





By   /s/ Becky Corigliano



Becky Corigliano, Chief Financial Officer
# C_2011321EN.01000701.xml

| 4.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 321/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 321/7

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2011/C 321/07

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

1

| Date and time of closure | 28.9.2011 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 28.9.2011-31.12.2011 |
| Member State | Latvia |
| Stock or Group of stocks | PRA/N3L. |
| Species | Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis) |
| Zone | NAFO 3L |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | — |
| Reference number | — |

Date and time of closure

28.9.2011

Duration

28.9.2011-31.12.2011

Member State

Latvia

Stock or Group of stocks

PRA/N3L.

Species

Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis)

Pandalus borealis

Zone

NAFO 3L

Type(s) of fishing vessels

—

Reference number

—

Web link to the decision of the Member State:

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/cfp/fishing_rules/tacs/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

---
PROTECCIÓN CONTRA CAÍDAS: tan simple como 1-2-3

En promedio, todos los años, la Administración de 

Seguridad y Salud en Minas (MSHA) ha emitido 111 

órdenes de retiro de personal debido a peligro inminente 

relacionado con caídas por no usar ningún sistema personal 

de detención de caídas o por usarlo de manera incorrecta.*

* Los datos reportados se basan en un análisis de 1057 órdenes de retiro de personal debido a peligro 

inminente emitidas por la MSHA entre el 2010 y el 2017. Las recomendaciones se basan en la norma 29 

CFR 1910.140 de la OSHA, Sistemas personales de protección contra caídas.

1. S ELECCIONE E INSPECCIONE

Seleccione un anclaje y un conector de anclaje estables, con la 

resistencia requerida, un arnés de cuerpo completo que se 

ajuste a su cuerpo, y un tipo y largo de eslinga según el 

tipo de trabajo y la distancia de caída. Inspeccione 

el arnés y la eslinga para ver si tienen cortes, 

rasgaduras, tierra o suciedad, grasa o marcas 

de quemaduras. Retire de servicio todo lo 

que esté dañado.

2. PÓNGASELO

Póngase el arnés de cuerpo completo y 

haga los ajustes necesarios para que se 

ajuste bien. Para que el sistema funcione, 

es fundamental que las correas alrededor 

de los muslos, la pelvis, la cintura y los 

hombros se ajusten bien.

3. ÁTELO

Primero conecte la eslinga al anillo en D del arnés 

de cuerpo completo y luego conecte el gancho de 

seguridad con cierre automático de la eslinga al conector 

de anclaje o a la línea de vida. 

Asegúrese de que el punto de anclaje tenga una clasificación indicada de 5000 libras por cada persona conectada y que 

toda la capacitación de seguridad necesaria para la prevención de caídas esté al día.

Para obtener más información, visite cdc.gov/niosh/mining

Centers for Disease Control

and Prevention

National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health

!

Descargo de responsabilidad: la mención de cualquier empresa o producto no constituye respaldo alguno del Instituto Nacional para la Seguridad y Salud Ocupacional de los 

Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades. Abril de 2020
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 4 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 5 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 6 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 7 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 8 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 9 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 10 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 11 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 12 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 13 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 14 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 15 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 16 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 17 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 18 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 19 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 20 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 21 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 22 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 23 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 24 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 25 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 26 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 27 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 28 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 29 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 30 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 31 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 32 of 33
Case 1:07-cv-03580-DLC Document 23-2 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 33 of 33
# C_2011228EN.01000901.xml

| 3.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/9

---

Notice concerning a request pursuant to Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC

Request from a contracting entity

2011/C 228/09

On 19 July 2011 the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors. The first working day following receipt of the request is 20 July 2011.

The request, made by RWE Gas Storage, concerns gas storage in the Czech Republic. Article 30 provides that Directive 2004/17/EC does not apply where the activity in question is directly exposed to competition on markets to which access is not restricted. These conditions are evaluated solely for the purposes of Directive 2004/17/EC and are without prejudice to the application of competition rules.

The Commission has a period of three months, as from the working day referred to above, within which to take a decision on this request. The period therefore ends on 20 October 2011.

This period may be extended by three months. Notice of any such extension must be published.

In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 30(6), further requests concerning exploration for and extraction of oil and gas in the Czech Republic submitted before the expiry of the period opened in respect of this request shall not be considered as new procedures and shall be treated in the context of this request.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

SHERRIE RUSSELL-BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:09-cv-257-MP-GRJ

ROBERT H JERRY, II, 

LEVIN COLLEGE OF LAW, 

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, 

THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 

BOARD OF TRUSTEES,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff, Sherrie Russell-Brown’s, Motion to

Dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaim. (Doc. 200). The motion presents complicated legal

issues and requires a resolution without undue delay. In light of this court’s full and

demanding docket and the undersigned’s present courtroom obligations, the undersigned

finds it is appropriate to specially refer this motion to a magistrate judge for the issuance

of a report and recommendation pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) and

Local Rule 72.3.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. The plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Defendants’ Counterclaim (doc. 200), along

with any related responses and replies, is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Gary R.

Jones to conduct any necessary hearings and to enter a report and recommendation

regarding the disposition of the motion.

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-GRJ Document 259 Filed 10/31/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The hearing currently scheduled for November 7, 2011 is cancelled. The

magistrate judge may reschedule it at his discretion.

DONE AND ORDERED this 31st day of October, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No: 1:09-cv-257-MP-GRJ

Case 1:09-cv-00257-MP-GRJ Document 259 Filed 10/31/11 Page 2 of 2
# C_2011241EN.01001201.xml

| 19.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/12

---

Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union

2011/C 241/08

Pursuant to the second indent of Article 9(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (1), the Explanatory Notes to the Combined Nomenclature of the European Union (2) are hereby amended as follows:

1

2

Page 144

Page 144

The second paragraph and the table of point 3 of the Additional Note 1 to Chapter 30 are amended as follows:

Additional Note 1 to Chapter 30

‘As regards the recommended daily allowance (RDA) for certain vitamins and minerals, see, for example, the table in the Annex to Council Directive 90/496/EEC of 24 September 1990 on nutrition labelling foodstuffs (OJ L 276, 6.10.1990, p. 40), amended by Commission Directive 2008/100/EC of 28 October 2008 (OJ L 285, 29.10.2008, p. 9), reproduced below:

| Vitamins and minerals | RDA |
| --- | --- |
| Vitamin A | 800 μg |
| Vitamin D | 5 μg |
| Vitamin E | 12 mg |
| Vitamin K | 75 μg |
| Vitamin C | 80 mg |
| Thiamin | 1,1 mg |
| Riboflavin | 1,4 mg |
| Niacin | 16 mg |
| Vitamin B6 | 1,4 mg |
| Folic acid | 200 μg |
| Vitamin B12 | 2,5 μg |
| Biotin | 50 μg |
| Pantothenic acid | 6 mg |
| Potassium | 2 000 mg |
| Chloride | 800 mg |
| Calcium | 800 mg |
| Phosphorus | 700 mg |
| Magnesium | 375 mg |
| Iron | 14 mg |
| Zinc | 10 mg |
| Copper | 1 mg |
| Manganese | 2 mg |
| Fluoride | 3,5 mg |
| Selenium | 55 μg |
| Chromium | 40 μg |
| Molybdenum | 50 μg |
| Iodine | 150 μg’ |

Vitamins and minerals

RDA

Vitamin A

800 μg

Vitamin D

5 μg

Vitamin E

12 mg

Vitamin K

75 μg

Vitamin C

80 mg

Thiamin

1,1 mg

Riboflavin

1,4 mg

Niacin

16 mg

Vitamin B6

1,4 mg

Folic acid

200 μg

Vitamin B12

2,5 μg

Biotin

50 μg

Pantothenic acid

6 mg

Potassium

2 000 mg

Chloride

800 mg

Calcium

800 mg

Phosphorus

700 mg

Magnesium

375 mg

Iron

14 mg

Zinc

10 mg

Copper

1 mg

Manganese

2 mg

Fluoride

3,5 mg

Selenium

55 μg

Chromium

40 μg

Molybdenum

50 μg

Iodine

150 μg’

---

(1)  OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 137, 6.5.2011, p. 1.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                  ------------

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gerald R. Mitchell, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date: February 7, 2006                        /s/ Gerald R. Mitchell
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                                Gerald R. Mitchell
                                   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial Officer)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 95-11202

(Summary Calendar)

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EJOOR PATRICK EKWEREKWU,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(USDC No. 3:93-CR-270-H)

- - - - - - - - - -

September 16, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Ejoor Patrick Ekwerekwu appeals from his conviction and

sentence for conspiracy to import heroin. Ekwerekwu argues that he

was denied both his constitutional and his statutory right to a

speedy trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Because the district court extended the period for retrial

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(e) and because Ekwerekwu’s retrial

commenced within the 180-day period, Ekwerekwu’s statutory right to
2

a speedy trial was not violated. See United States v. Holley, 986

F.2d 100, 103 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 821 (1993).

Further, the five-month delay was not “presumptively prejudicial”

for purposes of Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 (1972). See

Robinson v. Whitley, 2 F.3d 562, 567 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied,

510 U.S. 1167 (1994). Accordingly, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
# C_2011257EN.01000701.xml

| 1.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/7

---

Notice of the impending expiry of certain anti-dumping measures

2011/C 257/07

1.   As provided for in Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (1), the European Commission gives notice that, unless a review is initiated in accordance with the following procedure, the anti-dumping measures mentioned below will expire on the date mentioned in the table below.

1

2.   Procedure

Procedure

Union producers may lodge a written request for a review. This request must contain sufficient evidence that the expiry of the measures would be likely to result in a continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury.

Should the Commission decide to review the measures concerned, importers, exporters, representatives of the exporting country and Union producers will then be provided with the opportunity to amplify, rebut or comment on the matters set out in the review request.

3.   Time limit

Time limit

Union producers may submit a written request for a review on the above basis, to reach the European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade (Unit H-1), N-105 4/92, 1049 Brussels, Belgium (2) at any time from the date of the publication of the present notice but no later than three months before the date mentioned in the table below.

2

4.   This notice is published in accordance with Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.

| Product | Country(ies) of origin or exportation | Measures | Reference | Date of expiry (3) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Saddles | People's Republic of China | Anti-dumping duty | Council Regulation (EC) No 691/2007 (OJ L 160, 21.6.2007, p. 1) | 22.6.2012 |

Product

Country(ies) of origin or exportation

Measures

Reference

Date of expiry (3)

3

Saddles

People's Republic of China

Anti-dumping duty

Council Regulation (EC) No 691/2007 (OJ L 160, 21.6.2007, p. 1)

22.6.2012

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.

1

(2)  Fax +32 22956505.

2

(3)  The measure expires at midnight of the day mentioned in this column.

3

---