alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.2
 BARCLAYCARD FUNDING PLC
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F, and all reports on
Form 6-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of
Barclaycard Funding PLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, for inclusion in these
reports is included in these reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
servicer under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement and
based upon my knowledge and the annual compliance review required
under that agreement, and except as disclosed in the reports, the
servicer has fulfilled its obligations under that agreement; and5.
    
    The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
servicers compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement.
 By:
    
    /s/ Jonathon William AlbrightName:
    
    Jonathon William AlbrightTitle:
    
    DirectorDate:
    
    June 27, 2007
 -27-
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

MELISSA BROWN, 

 Plaintiff 

vs. 

CALHOUN-LIBERTY HOSPITAL 

ASSOCIATION, INC., d/b/a CALHOUNLIBERTY HOSPITAL 

 Defendant. 

/

Case Number: _______________________ 

Calhoun County Case No: 2009-CA-00323 

NOTICE OF REMOVAL

 Defendant, CALHOUN-LIBERTY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC., d/b/a 

CALHOUN-LIBERTY HOSPITAL, by and through its undersigned attorneys, files this 

Notice of Removal and, as grounds therefore, states: 

1. Removal of this cause is authorized pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 

1446. 

2. Plaintiff originally filed this action in the Circuit Court of the Fourteenth 

Judicial Circuit in and for Calhoun County, Florida (Case No. 2009-CA-00323). 

3. This action is one in which this Court has original jurisdiction pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 1343, in that it alleges, or attempts to allege, claims that arise under 

federal law, specifically 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq. and 42 U.S.C. §1981a. 

4. Defendant was served with the Summons and Complaint on Defendant on 

December 9, 2009. 

Case 5:09-cv-00403-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 12/23/09 Page 1 of 2
5. This Notice of Removal is filed timely within thirty (30) days after service 

of the Summons and Complaint. 

6. Defendant has provided Plaintiff and the Clerk of the Fourteenth Judicial 

Circuit Court in and for Calhoun County, Florida with written notice of the filing of this 

Notice of Removal. 

 7. True and correct copies of all pleadings filed in the Circuit Court of the 

Fourteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Calhoun County, Florida (Case No. 2009-CA00323) are being filed with the Clerk of Court for the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of Florida simultaneously with this Notice of Removal. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

BROAD AND CASSEL 

s/Ginger Lynne Barry____________ 

Ginger L. Barry 

Florida Bar Number 0294550 

200 Grand Boulevard, Suite 205A 

Destin, Florida 32550 

Telephone: (850) 269-0148 

Telecopier: (850) 521-1472 

gbarry@broadandcassel.com 

Attorneys for Defendant 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been 

provided by via ECF/CM to Marie A. Mattox, P.A., 310 East Bradford Road, 

Tallahassee, Florida 32303, on this 23rd day of December, 2009. 

s/Ginger Lynne Barry____________ 

 Attorney 

Case 5:09-cv-00403-RS-MD Document 1 Filed 12/23/09 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 13.3
 RECEIVABLES TRUSTEES OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
 GRACECHURCH RECEIVABLES TRUSTEE LIMITED
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  1.
    
    I am a duly appointed, qualified and acting Director of the Receivables Trustee;2.
    
    I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate on behalf of the Receivables Trustee; and3.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, the Receivables Trustee has complied with all conditions and covenants under the
Relevant Documents for the issue of the Investor Certificate for the period between January 1, 2005 and
December 31, 2005.
   By:
    
    /s/ Paul Gerard TurnerName:
    
    Paul Gerard TurnerTitle:
    
    Director
 - 31 -
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 

vs. 3:10cr6/MCR

CHRISTINA A. WILLIAMS,

 Defendant.

_____________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11,

Fed.R.Crim.P., and has entered a plea of guilty to the two count indictment against

her. After cautioning and examining the defendant under oath concerning the

subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowledgeable

and voluntary, and that the offense charged is supported by an independent basis

in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offense. I therefore

recommend that the plea of guiltybe accepted and that the defendant be adjudicated

guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: March 4, 2010

 /s/ Miles Davis

MILES DAVIS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed

within 24 hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th
EXHIBIT 11

                      SIENA HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        Quarter Ended  Quarter Ended
                                                                        September 30,  September 30,
                                                                            2000           1999
                                                                        ----------------------------
<S>                                                                       <C>            <C>
BASIC EARNINGS  PER SHARE COMPUTATION:
Net income available to common stockholders .....................         $    9         $    25
                                                                          ======         =======
Weighted average common shares outstanding ......................          6,000 *         6,000 *

BASIC EARNINGS  PER SHARE:
Net income available to common stockholders .....................         $ 0.00 *       $  0.00 *
                                                                          ======         =======
DILUTED EARNINGS  PER SHARE COMPUTATION:
Income available to common stockholders .........................         $    9         $    25
Income effect of assumed conversions ............................             --              --
                                                                          ------         -------
Net income available to common stockholders + assumed conversions         $    9         $    25
                                                                          ======         =======
Weighted average common shares outstanding ......................          6,000           6,000 *
Plus: Dilutive potential common shares under the SHI
              Nonqualified Stock Option Plans ...................            117              60 *
                                                                          ------         -------
Adjusted weighted average shares outstanding ....................          6,117           6,060 *
                                                                          ======         =======
DILUTED EARNINGS  PER SHARE:
Income available to common stockholders .........................         $ 0.00         $  0.00 *
Income effect of assumed conversions ............................             --              --
                                                                          ------         -------
Net income available to common stockholders + assumed conversions         $ 0.00         $  0.00 *
                                                                          ======         =======
</TABLE>

* Average share and per share amounts are based on shares issued or reserved for
issuance to creditors.
# C_2011053EN.01000801.xml

| 19.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/8

---

Commission information notice pursuant to the procedure laid down in the first subparagraph of Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community

Imposition of public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services between Lampedusa and Pantelleria and Trapani, Palermo and Catania

(Text with EEA relevance)

2011/C 53/04

| Member State | Italy |
| --- | --- |
| Concerned routes | Pantelleria–Trapani and vice-versa
  Pantelleria–Palermo and vice-versa
  Lampedusa–Palermo and vice-versa
  Lampedusa–Catania and vice-versa |
| Date of entry into force of the public service obligations | 27 March 2011 |
| Address where information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge | ENAC Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile |
| Direzione centrale regolazione economica |
| Direzione trasporto aereo |
| Viale del Castro Pretorio 118 |
| 00185 Roma RM |
| ITALIA |
| http://www.enac.gov.it |
| E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it |

Member State

Italy

Concerned routes

Pantelleria–Trapani and vice-versa

Pantelleria–Palermo and vice-versa

Lampedusa–Palermo and vice-versa

Lampedusa–Catania and vice-versa

Date of entry into force of the public service obligations

27 March 2011

Address where information and/or documentation related to the public service obligation can be obtained free of charge

ENAC Ente nazionale per l’aviazione civile

Direzione centrale regolazione economica

Direzione trasporto aereo

Viale del Castro Pretorio 118

00185 Roma RM

ITALIA

http://www.enac.gov.it

E-mail: osp@enac.gov.it

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



In connection with the Annual Report of Neoforma, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2004 as filed with the SEC on or about the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Zollars, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    March 16, 2005 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    ROBERT J. ZOLLARS                                                            
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Robert J. Zollars Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

PEGGY PIERCE , Appellant ,

v. JEFF KESTER, ROYALTY SUPPLY, INC., and ROYALTY WELL SERVICE, INC

. , Appellee s
. § § § § § No. 08

- 23

- 00 2 42

- CV Appeal from the

1 43rd Judicial D istrict Court

o f Ward County, Texas (TC# 22

- 04

- 25995

- CVW )

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before this Court is the parties ’ joint motion to dismiss this appea l. The parties state they
have reached a settlement agreement that includes the dismissal of this appeal , with all cost s being taxed against the party incurring the same. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 provides the actions a court may t ake to dispose of an appeal on the motion of the appellant or by agreeme nt of the parties. On the motion of appellant, the court may dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1)

. When parties file an agreement signed by all parties or their attorneys, the court may:

“ (A) render judgme nt effectuating the parties’ agreement; (B) set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in2 accordance with the agreement; or (C) abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement.” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2) (A)

– (C)

. After reviewing the motion and settlement agreement, which we note has been signed by attorneys for both parties , we conclude the substance of the agreement seeks a voluntary dismissal
under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)( 1)

. Therefore, the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. Each party shall bear the costs of this appeal pursuant to their agreement and joint motion

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d)

.

G INA M. PALAFOX , Justice January 3 1 , 202 4
Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, J J.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned, Michael J. Hagan, the Chief Executive Officer of NutriSystem, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that based on the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | The Companys Form 10-K Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 29, 2008

/S/ MICHAEL J. HAGANChairman and Chief Executive Officer
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 3 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 3 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 3 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 3 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 3 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 3 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:07-cv-02262-WHP Document 3 Filed 04/05/2007 Page 7 of 7
- Text147: 
    - Text148: 
    - Text149: 
    - Text150: 
    - Text151: 
    - Text152: 
    - Text153: 
    - Text154: 
    - Text155: 
    - Text156:
January 21, 2015

Ms. Lisa Matz, Clerk

Fifth Court of Appeals

Via Tex File

Re: Sweeney v. State; No. 05-14-00522-CR.

Dear Ms. Matz,

This matter is currently set before Justices Francis, Lang-Meirs, and Whitehill on 

February 11, 2015 at 1 p.m. Appellant hereby gives notice Eddie Cawlfield will be 

conducting oral argument at that time.

Please feel free to contact me about any question or concern you may have at 

(972) 369-0577.

Best regards,

/s/ Jeremy Rosenthal

Attorney for Appellant, 

Craigh Sweeney

cc: Collin County DA’s Office

Lawyer for the State

ROSENTHAL Jeremy F. Rosenthal*

Derk A. Wadas*

Bo Kalabus

Kyle T. Therrian

Ryan Kreck

Eddie Cawlfield

 *Board Certified – Criminal Law

 Texas Board of Legal Specialization

4500 W. Eldorado Parkway, Suite 3000

McKinney, Texas 75070

TEL: 972-369-0577

FAX: 972-369-0532

WEB: www.rosenthalwadas.com

& WADAS A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION

ACCEPTED

05-14-00522-CR

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

1/21/2015 12:05:09 PM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 1/21/2015 12:05:09 PM LISA MATZ Clerk
**EXHIBIT 99.1**ANNUAL SERVICER’S CERTIFICATEBARCLAYS BANK PLCGRACECHURCH CARD FUNDING (NO. 6) PLC     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Barclays Bank PLC (the “Bank”), asServicer, pursuant to the Beneficiaries Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 23, 1999 (the“Agreement”), among the Bank, as Servicer and Barclaycard Funding PLC, as Investor Beneficiary,does hereby certify that:     1. The Bank is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Agreement.Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings asset forth in the Agreement.     2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.     3. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the calendar year ended December 31, 2005 was conducted under my supervision.     4. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge,performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreementthroughout such calendar year and no material default in the performance ofsuch obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in theParagraph 5 below.     5. The following is a description of each material default in the performanceof the Servicer’s obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known tothe undersigned to have been made by the Servicer during the calendar yearended December 31, 2005, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each suchdefault, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each suchdefault and (iii) the current status of each such default:     None.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Annual Servicer’s Certificate this23rd day of June, 2006.         Barclays Bank PLC  as Servicer    By: /s/ Paul Gerard Turner    **Name:** **Paul Gerard Turner**    **Title:** **Finance Director**      **Barclaycard UK Consumer Finance Division**
 - 32 -
Case 1:06-cv-14856-AKH Document 3 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
---

Exhibit 32.1



Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:



(a)

The Form 10-K/A of the Company for the year-ended December 31, 2008, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b)

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                       |  |                        
|                       |  |                        
|Date: November 5, 2009 |  | /s/ William L. Hunter .
|                       |  | William L. Hunter, M.D.
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  |                        
|Date: November 5, 2009 |  | /s/ K. Thomas Bailey.  
|                       |  | K. Thomas Bailey       
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer



---
**13.1****Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), theundersigned, as chief executive officer and chief financialofficers of ENEL S.p.A. (the “Company”), respectively,do hereby certify, to their knowledge, that:The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the“Form 20-F”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, and information contained in theForm 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: June 28, 2006     /s/ Fulvio Conti           Name: Fulvio Conti     Title:  Chief Executive Officer      /s/ Luigi Ferraris           Name: Luigi Ferraris     Title:  Chief Financial Officer      /s/ Claudio Machetti           Name: Claudio Machetti     Title:  Chief Financial OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,United States Code) has been provided to Enel S.p.A. and will beretained by Enel S.p.A. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
11
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

MICHAEL J. LOEBER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 5:09cv402/RS-MD

LARRY CAMPBELL, in his official capacity

as Sheriff of Leon County, Florida; and

PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants.

_______________________________________

LARRY CAMPBELL, in his official capacity

as Sheriff of Leon County, 

Counter-Claimant,

vs.

MICHAEL J. LOEBER,

Counter-Defendant.

______________________________________/

ORDER

Before me is Defendants’ Notice of Conflict (Doc. 67). Consideration of this

notice is deferred until Defendants’ counsel provides an explanation of how and

why the alleged scheduling conflict arose. This case was scheduled for trial by

the Scheduling and Mediation Order (Doc. 63) filed on December 2, 2010. The

parties’ joint report filed on December 1, 2010 (Doc. 60), stated, “Moreover,

counsel for Defendant Sheriff PRESENTLY is likely to have trials scheduled for

March, April, May, June and July 2011.” Three months have passed without
any notice, until now, from Defendants’ attorney that a scheduling conflict existed

for the July 25, 2011, trial date.

Not later than March 8, 2011, Defendants’ attorney shall provide a full

explanation of how and when his state court conflict arose and shall explain why that

schedule conflict was not promptly reported to this court prior to the issuance of the

Scheduling and Mediation Order.

ORDERED on March 1, 2011.

/S/ Richard Smoak 

RICHARD SMOAK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE