alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY



In connection with Amendment No. 2 on Form 40-F/A to the Annual Report of Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dr. William L. Hunter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





­­­­/s/ William L. Hunter



Name: Dr. William L. Hunter

Title: Chief Executive Officer

May 6, 2005





A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies the Form 40-F/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 40-F/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
# C_2012351EN.01008901.xml

| 15.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/89 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/89

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy’

COM(2012) 277 final — 2012/143 (COD)

2012/C 351/20

On 14 June and 15 June 2012, the European Parliament and the Council respectively decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 43 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy

COM(2012) 277 final — 2012/0143 (COD).

Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal, it decided at its 483rd plenary session of 18 and 19 September 2012 (meeting of 18 September 2012), by 148 votes with 8 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 18 September 2012.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

TRUST FINANCIAL, A MORTGAGE

COMPANY, LLC, a Texas Limited

Liability Company,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:10cv49-SPM/AK

FORT ATKINSON PLANTATION, LLC.,

a Florida Limited Liability Company, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND

AND GRANTING LEAVE TO WITHDRAW

This cause comes before the Court on the Motion to Withdraw and for

Extension of Time to Answer (doc. 22) filed by attorney Patrick K. McCarthy and

Matthews & Hawkins, P.A., who are counsel of record for Defendants Sherrod

Campbell and Charles Sherwood. Upon consideration, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The motion (doc. 22) is granted.

2. Attorney Patrick K. McCarthy and Matthews & Hawkins, P.A. are

granted leave to withdraw.

3. Sherrod Campbell and Charles Sherwood shall have up to and 
including July 8, 2010, to respond to the complaint.

4. The clerk shall send a copy of this order by regular mail and

certified mail to Sherrod Campbell, 191 Jamerson Place, Baldwin, GA, 30511

and to Charles Sherwood, 10 Sourwood Drive, Cornelia, GA 30531. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2010.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

CASE NO.: 1:10cv49-SPM/AK
# C_2011085EN.01000201.xml

| 18.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 85/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 85/2

---

Draft amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2011 — Council position

2011/C 85/02

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic and Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (1), as last amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1081/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 (2), and in particular Article 37 thereof,

1

2

Whereas:

| — | the European Union's general budget for the financial year 2011 was definitively adopted on 15 December 2010 (3), |
| --- | --- |

—

the European Union's general budget for the financial year 2011 was definitively adopted on 15 December 2010 (3),

3

| — | on 14 January 2011, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 1 to the general budget for the financial year 2011, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 14 January 2011, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 1 to the general budget for the financial year 2011,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2011 was adopted on 15 March 2011.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 15 March 2011.

For the Council

The President

MATOLCSY Gy.

---

(1)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1, with corrigenda in OJ L 25, 30.1.2003, p. 43 and OJ L 99, 14.4.2007, p. 18.

1

(2)  OJ L 311, 26.11.2010, p. 9.

2

(3)  OJ L 68, 15.3.2011, p. 1.

3

---
Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 1 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 2 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 3 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 4 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 5 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 6 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 7 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 8 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 9 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 10 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 11 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 12 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 13 of 14Case 5:10-cv-00079-RH-GRJ Document 32 Filed 12/20/10 Page 14 of 14
#### STATE v. HARRIS

No. 463P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App. 239.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 21 September 1982.
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 3 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 4 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 5 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 6 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 7 of 8
Case 7:07-cv-03502-CLB Document 1 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 8 of 8
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133337 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133337 COA: 275179 Muskegon CC: 06-053153-FC LIBRADO CERVEN TEZ GARZA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
thm5
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7144** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DAVID MICHAEL BLACKMON, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Concord , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. ( 3:01

- cr - 00184

- GCM

- 5 )

Submitted : November 1, 2012 Decided: November 6, 2012

Before SHEDD, GREGORY, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

David Michael Blackmon , Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Asheville, North Carolina; Gretchen C. F. Shappert, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Washington, D.C. , for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
David Michael Blackmon appeals the district court ’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we a ffirm for the reasons stated by the district court

. See United States v.
Blackmon , No. 3:01

- cr - 00184

- GCM

- 5 (W.D.N.C. June 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Energy Quest Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wilfred J. Ouellette, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  March 30, 2011



/s/ Wilfred J. OuelletteWilfred J. Ouellette
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. JAMES

No. 517P82.

Case below: 58 N.C. App 506.

Petition by defendants for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 5 October 1982.
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 2 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 3 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 4 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 5 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 6 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 7 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 8 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 9 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 10 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 11 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 12 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 13 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 14 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 15 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 16 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 17 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 18 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 19 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 20 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 21 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 22 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 23 of 24
Case 1:07-cv-03545-DAB Document 9 Filed 10/05/2007 Page 24 of 24
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6163

JOHN BACCUS, a/k/a John Baccus Roosevelt,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

EDGAR L. CLEMENTS, III; VON DEAN TURBEVILLE; BARRY PROSSER; 

AMBER MCDANIEL THOMPSON; KEITH LUTCKEN; BRIAN WALLACE; 

PAUL BAKER; MICHELLE DIXON; JOHN BLACK,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (4:17-cv-01851-DCN)

Submitted: June 21, 2018 Decided: June 26, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Roosevelt Baccus, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Roosevelt Baccus seeks to appeal from the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Baccus’s 42 

U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. Finding no error, we affirm on the reasoning of the 

district court.*

 See Baccus v. Clements, No. 4:17-cv-01851-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 23, 2018).

We deny Baccus’s motions for a transcript at Government expense and for appointment 

of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * The grounds of the dismissal make clear that no amendment could cure the 

defects in Baccus’s case. Therefore, the order is final and appealable. See Goode v. Cent. 

Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 625, 629-30 (4th Cir. 2015).
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CHASE JONES

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 21

- 2695

LT Case No. 2018

- CF

- 4471

- A

- X

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Decision filed September 13, 2022

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for Marion County

, Lisa D. Herndon , Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Robert Jackson Pearce, I II

, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alyssa Marie Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER

, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS , JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Income, Balance Sheet and Statement of Cash Flows, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                        2,056,082  
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                         19,199 
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                           1,303,904 
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                            56,100 
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   4,974,688 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,409,973 
<COMMON>                                                 0 
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                                0 
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                                126,491 
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                     126,491 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                             2,934,074 
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                       0 
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                        4,117,600 
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                           0 
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      397,000 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                                0 
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                              0 
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                         0 
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                     834,808 
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                    8,409,973 
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                        1,226,448 
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               (77,862)
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         869,838 
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         791,976 
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            434,472 
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                (142,954)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     291,518 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           202,649 
<NET-INCOME>                                       125,094 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          8,037 
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      117,057 
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                            54,147 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          195,088 
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             511,800 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.00 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.00 
                                                 
                                              

</TABLE>
Case 1:07-cv-03555-BSJ-THK     Document 8      Filed 11/16/2007     Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-14978-AKH Document 4 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
# C_2011369EN.01001601.xml

| 17.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/16

---

Notice for the attention of the persons to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2011/848/CFSP, apply

2011/C 369/04

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

The following information is brought to the attention of the persons that appear in the Annex to Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP, as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2011/848/CFSP (1).

1

The United Nations Security Council has designated the persons that should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to the measures imposed by paragraphs 13 and 15 of Resolution 1596 (2005), as renewed by paragraph 3 of Resolution 1952 (2010).

The persons and entities concerned may submit at any time a request to the UN Committee established pursuant to paragraph 8 of UNSCR 1533 (2004), together with any supporting documentation, for the decisions to include them in the UN list to be reconsidered. Such a request should be sent to the following address:

| United Nations — Focal point for delisting |
| --- |
| Security Council Subsidiary Organs Branch |
| Room S-3055 E |
| New York, NY 10017 |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |

United Nations — Focal point for delisting

Security Council Subsidiary Organs Branch

Room S-3055 E

New York, NY 10017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

See for more information at: http://www.un.org/sc/committees/751/comguide.shtml

Further to the UN decision, the Council of the European Union has determined that the persons that appear in the above-mentioned Annex should be included in the list of persons and entities which are subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision 2010/788/CFSP as implemented by Council Implementing Decision 2011/848/CFSP. The grounds for designation of the persons concerned appear in the relevant entries in Annex to the Council Decision.

The attention of the persons concerned is drawn to the possibility of making an application to the competent authorities of the relevant Member State(s) as indicated in the web-sites in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1183/2005, in order to obtain an authorisation to use frozen funds for basic needs or specific payments (cf. Article 3 of the Regulation).

The persons concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above-mentioned lists should be reconsidered, to the address provided above.

The attention of the persons concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's Decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ L 335, 17.12.2011, p. 83.

1

---
#### STATE v. ANDERSON

No. 296 PC.

Case below: 42 N.C. App. 505.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 10 September 1979.
#### BURROW v. JONES

No. 194 PC.

Case below: 51 N.C. App. 549.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 8 July 1981.
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                 ------------

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of K-V Pharmaceutical Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gerald R. Mitchell, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


Date:  August 8, 2006                     /s/ Gerald R. Mitchell
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                               Gerald R. Mitchell
                                   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03592-DAB Document 14 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 2 of 2