alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
712212008 Walker Patrick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

VIACOM INTERNATIONAL INC. COMEDY FigueirdDecl.Tab

PARTNERS COUNTRY MUSIC 123

TELEVISION INC. PAR1OUNT

PICTURES CORPORATION and BLACK

ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION LLC

Plaintiffs

vs. Case No. l07CV02103

YOUTUBE INC. YOUTUBE LLC

and GOOGLE INC.

Defendants.

THE FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION PREMIER

LEAGUE LIMITED BOURNE CO. et al

on behalf of themselves and all

others similarly situated

Plaintiffs

vs. Case No. 07CV3582

YOUTUBE INC. YOUTUBE LLC and

GOOGLE INC.

Defendants.

DEPOSITION OF PATRICK WALKER

SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA

TUESDAY JULY 22 2008

REPORTED BY

YVONNE FENNELLY CRP CSR NO. 5495

JOB NO. 15375
712212008 Walker Patrick

123-0002

proposed deal terms and theyre set forth on the bottom

of the first page.

A. Yes.

Q. Were those deal terms proposed by Youlube

A. No. These were the terms indicated in the RFP.

Q. That you received meaning YouTube received

from the Premier League

A. Correct.

10 Q. And take it that these deal terms were not

11 agreed to

12 A. We decided not to make bid for these rights.

13 Q. Okay.

14 A. Although did explain to Phil that it didnt

15 match the way in which we were operating and did say

16 Id very much like to work with him on the distribution

17 of the archive content.

18 Q. In what way did they not -- were the proposed

19 terms inconsistent with the way YouTube was operated

20 A. The way that these rights were being offered

21 put the one who would win that bid in position where

22 they were responsible for the distribution of that the

23 sublicensing of that.

24 My position was that although it was

25 interesting to consider and very much appreciated that

227
712212008 Walker Patrick

123-0003

we would have an opportunity to potentially participate

our position had been consistently one where we would

work with whoever the end rights holder was and thei

once those rights were established we would work with

those parties to assist them in their exploitation of

their rights in those geographies. And in fact as soon

as those rights were distributed we were contacted by

number of licensees who were very interested in working

10 with us on the revenue generation via Youlube.

11 Q. And have you entered into agreements with aiy

12 of those licensees

13 A. We have not. The Premier League disallowed

14 them from working with us.

15 Q. Who told you that the Premier League disallowed

16 them from working with you

17 A. They did.

18 Q. And who is the they

19 A. Two organizations in particular one Virgin

20 Media who acquired those rights for the UK who were

21 actually quite frustrated that they werent allowed to

22 distribute that content in their geography via YouTube

23 in addition to their own video platform. Another one

24 was Sport EN Sport big big V.

25 William Head is the CEO of that company and he

228
Case 1:07-cv-03583-LBS-RLE Document 4 Filed 05/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
# EUR-Lex - - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

#

**Appointment of a member of the Court of Auditors - Baudilio Tomé Muguruza European Parliament decision of 14 February 2012 on the nomination of Baudilio Tomé Muguruza as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C7-0015/2012 – 2012/0801(NLE)) **

*
Official Journal C 249 E , 30/08/2013 P. 0075 - 0075 *

Appointment of a member of the Court of Auditors - Baudilio Tomé Muguruza

P7_TA(2012)0038

European Parliament decision of 14 February 2012 on the nomination of Baudilio Tomé Muguruza as a Member of the Court of Auditors (C7-0015/2012 – 2012/0801(NLE))

2013/C 249 E/26

(Consultation)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to Article 286(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0015/2012),

- having regard to Rule 108 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A7-0036/2012),

A. whereas Parliament’s Committee on Budgetary Control proceeded to evaluate the credentials of the nominee, in particular in view of the requirements laid down in Article 286(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

B. whereas at its meeting of 9 February 2012 the Committee on Budgetary Control heard the Council’s nominee for membership of the Court of Auditors,

1. Delivers a favourable opinion on the Council’s nomination of Baudilio Tomé Muguruza as a Member of the Court of Auditors;

2. Instructs its President to forward this decision to the Council and, for information, the Court of Auditors, the other institutions of the European Union and the audit institutions of the Member States.

--------------------------------------------------
Case 7:07-cv-03549-SCR Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03549-SCR Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03549-SCR Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 7:07-cv-03549-SCR Document 1 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 4 of 4
IMAN ELSHAAR, WIFE,

Appellant,

v.

YOUSSEF ALSAGHIR, 

HUSBAND,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-5773

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 3, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

David C. Wiggins, Judge.

Carole A. Vogel, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Michael J. Korn and Donald E. Brown, Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Case 1:07-cv-03579-LTS-MHD Document 14 Filed 08/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration 

# AGENCY:

International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that the Department of Commerce is searching for individuals to help advise and assist the Department on manufacturing policies by applying to be members of The Manufacturing Council. The mission of The Manufacturing Council, a Secretarial Board at the Department of Commerce, is to ensure regular communication between the Federal Government and the manufacturing sector. The Council advises the Secretary of Commerce on government policies and programs that affect U.S. manufacturing and provides a forum for proposing solutions to industry-related problems. For information about the Council, please visit the Manufacturing Council Web site at:                         *http://www.manufacturing.gov/​council.htm.*

The Department of Commerce is seeking applicants who are active manufacturing executives (Chairman, President or CEO level) that are leaders within their local manufacturing communities and industries. To the extent possible, the Department would like to ensure a balanced membership of U.S. manufacturing industry sectors, geographic locations, and business sizes. Potential candidates must be U.S. citizens. 

*Deadline:*                         Applications for immediate appointment should be received prior to November 15, 2007. However, applications will accepted throughout FY2008 for consideration in the case of future vacancies.                     

*Interested Applicants:*                         Interested applicants should send a resume and cover letter to: The Manufacturing Council Executive Secretariat, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 4043, Washington, DC 20230.                     

Dated: October 25, 2007. 

Kate Worthington, 

Executive Secretariat, The Manufacturing Council. 

[FR Doc. 07-5427 Filed 10-31-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DR-P
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-42 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:07-cv-03345-RJS Document 32-42 Filed 09/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA caseno. /f 1Ocr 14
v.

CHRISTOPHER SCOTT CARTER

REQUEST FOR SUMMONS
Pursuant to Rule 9(a), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Clerk of the above-styled
Court will please issue a summons in lieu of warrant, directed to the defendant, CHRISTOPHER
SCOTT CARTER, and set said cause for initial appearance/arraignment at the appropriate time
as the Court directs.

DATED this 19th day of April, 2010.

Respectfully submitted,

THOMAS F. KIRWIN

; United States Attorney
Oo
g! .
ful ge” G! Li —
d y ~T. WILLIAMS

Assistant United States Attorney
Florida Bar No. 936219
300 East University Ave, Suite 310

Gainesville, FL 32601
(352) 378-0996

Recta 49-1 0UspeF int pata

ma?
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Richard R. Walters, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Little Squaw Gold Mining Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a  15(f) and 15d  15(f) for Little Squaw Gold Mining Company and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Little Squaw Gold Mining Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

disclosed in this report any change in Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys auditors and the audit committee of Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys  board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Little Squaw Gold Mining Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business owners internal controls over financial reporting;



Date: May 14, 2004



By   /s/ Richard R. Walters



Richard R. Walters

President and  Chief Executive Officer

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

RITCHIE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., 

RITCHIE RISK-LINKED STRATEGIES 

TRADING (IRELAND), LIMITED, RITCHIE 

RISK-LINKED STRATEGIES TRADING 

(IRELAND) II, LIMITED, WALKERS SPV 

LIMITED, as trustee for Ritchie Risk-Linked 

Life Strategies Trust I and Ritchie Life 

Strategies Master Trust, and RITCHIE RISKLINKED STRATEGIES TRADING, LTD., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

COVENTRY FIRST LLC, THE COVENTRY 

GROUP, INC., MONTGOMERY CAPITAL, 

INC., LST I LLC, ALAN BUERGER, 

CONSTANCE BUERGER, REID S. 

BUERGER, ANTONIO MUNIZ, ALEX 

SELDIN, NEAL JACOBS, EILEEN SHOVLIN, 

and JIM DODARO, 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

07 Civ. 3494 (DLC) 

ECF Case 

PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 7.1 

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs submit the 

following statement identifying their parent corporations and any publicly held 

corporation owning 10% or more of their stock. 

1. Plaintiff Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C. has no parent corporation 

and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its membership interests. 

2. The parents of Plaintiff Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies Trading (Ireland), 

Limited are Matsack Trust Limited and Matsack Nominees Limited, and no publicly held 

corporation owns 10% or more of its ordinary shares. 

Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

3. The parents of Plaintiff Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies Trading (Ireland) 

II, Limited are Matsack Trust Limited and Matsack Nominees Limited, and no publicly 

held corporation owns 10% or more of its ordinary shares. 

4. Plaintiff Walkers SPV Limited is trustee for Ritchie Risk-Linked Life 

Strategies Trust I. The sole beneficiary of Ritchie Risk-Linked Life Strategies Trust I is 

Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies, L.L.C., the parent of which is Ritchie Multi-Strategy 

Global, L.L.C., which has no parent corporation and is not publicly traded. 

5. Plaintiff Walkers SPV Limited also is trustee for Ritchie Life Strategies 

Master Trust, the sole beneficiary of which is Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies Trading, 

Ltd., which is described in paragraph 6 below. 

6. The parent of Plaintiff Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies Trading, Ltd. is 

Ritchie Risk-Linked Strategies (Bermuda), Ltd., which has no parent corporation and is 

not publicly traded. 

Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:07-cv-03494-DLC Document 2 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 3 of 3
---

|CERTIFICATION                                
|---------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dominique de la Roche, Chief Financial Officer of Rockwell
Diamonds Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Annual Report on Form 40-F of
the Company for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2008 (the Annual Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| | By:    | /s/ D. de la Roche     
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | Dominique de la Roche  
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | May 28, 2008           

This written statement is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form
40-F. A signed original of this statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Annual Report on Form
40-F pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---
#### STATE v. BROWN

No. 67 PC.

Case below: 34 N.C. App. 165.

Petition by defendant for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 denied 11 November 1977.
MANDATE

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-01105-CV

Isabel Campbell, Appellant

v.

Amanda Duffy Mabry, Individually and 

as Independent Executrix of the Estate 

of Austin R. Duffy, Appellee

Appealed from the Probate Court No. 1 

of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 410,842-

401). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Christopher. Chief Justice Frost and 

Justice Busby also participating (Frost, 

C.J., dissenting).

TO THE PROBATE COURT NO. 1 OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals on January 22, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise 

or reverse your judgment was determined. Our Court of Appeals made its order in these 

words:

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed November 26, 2013 in favor of 

appellee Amanda Duffy Mabry, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate 

of Austin R. Duffy, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the 

record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court 

below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the 

court’s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee Amanda Duffy Mabry, Individually and as Independent Executrix of the Estate 

of Austin R. Duffy.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court 

in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.
WITNESS, the Hon. Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our Fourteenth Court 

of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Houston, April 3, 2015.
#### WEIL’S, INC. v. TRANSPORTATION CO.

No. 106 PC.

Case below: 11 N.C. App. 554.

Petition for writ of *certiorari*to North Carolina Court of Appeals denied 6 September 1971.
#### STATE v. CROUCH

No. 235 PC.

Case below: 41 N.C. App. 612.

Petition by defendant for certiorari to North Carolina Court of Appeals allowed 3 August 1979 and the cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the case on its merits.
# C_2011210EN.01002501.xml

| 16.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/25

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position at its meeting of 22 March 2011 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.168 — PO/Haberdasheries: Fasteners

Rapporteur: Spain

2011/C 210/11

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on inability to pay. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on inability to pay.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fine. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fine.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union but asks the Commission to take account of the extremely confidential nature of the case in deciding on timing and content of publication of this Opinion. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union but asks the Commission to take account of the extremely confidential nature of the case in deciding on timing and content of publication of this Opinion.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
#### RUTLEDGE v. TULTEX CORP.

No. 415PA82.

Case below: 56 N.C. App. 345.

Petition by plaintiff for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 allowed 3 August 1982.
II 

Calendar No. 244 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2159 

[Report No. 116–130] 

To repeal the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to confer jurisdiction on the State 

of North Dakota over offenses committed by or against Indians on 

the Devils Lake Indian Reservation’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 18, 2019 

Mr. HOEVEN (for himself and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

OCTOBER 16, 2019 

Reported by Mr. HOEVEN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To repeal the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to confer jurisdiction 

on the State of North Dakota over offenses committed 

by or against Indians on the Devils Lake Indian Reservation’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 2159 RS

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

2 The Act entitled ‘‘An Act to confer jurisdiction on 

3 the State of North Dakota over offenses committed by or 

4 against Indians on the Devils Lake Indian Reservation’’, 

5 approved May 31, 1946 (60 Stat. 229), is repealed. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Calendar No. 244 

116TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2159 

[Report No. 116–130] 

A BILL 

To repeal the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to confer jurisDevils Lake Indian Reservation’’. fenses committed by or against Indians on the diction on the State of North Dakota over ofOCTOBER 16, 2019 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
# C_2011032EN.01002601.xml

| 1.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/26

---

Notice concerning a request in accordance with Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC — Deadline extension

Request made on behalf of a Member State

2011/C 32/17

On 26 October 2010, the Commission received a request in accordance with Article 30(4) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1).

1

This request, which comes from the Kingdom of Denmark, concerns exploration for and extraction of oil and gas in that country. The request was published in OJ C 300, 6.11.2010, p. 37. The initial period expired on 27 January 2011. In accordance with the provisions of the third sentence of Article 30(6), the period within which the Commission must reach a decision concerning this request was extended by one month, until 27 February 2011. This extension was published in OJ C 332, 9.12.2010, p. 11.

However, in accordance with the first indent of Article 3(4) of Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 1182/71 of 3 June 1971 determining the rules applicable to periods, dates and time limits, the final deadline was extended to midnight on 28 February 2011, since 27 February 2011 is a Sunday.

---

(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

---